alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries**

**Certification Of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Rodney M. Tiede, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)

The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 13, 2010

 

 

/s/ Rodney M. Tiede

Rodney M. Tiede

Chief Executive Officer
### §458gg. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458gg was editorially reclassified as section 5367 of this title.
#### § 2720.4 Issuance of document of conveyance.

Upon receipt of the payment required by § 2720.3 of this subpart, if any is required, the authorized officer shall issue the necessary document conveying to the applicant the mineral interests of the United States in the land covered by the application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         168,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,332,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   289,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,813,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,571,000
<PP&E>                                       5,368,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,766,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,382,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,908,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,031,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,064,000
<SALES>                                     15,129,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,129,000
<CGS>                                       11,020,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,115,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,000,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   400,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            600,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   600,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Fossil Energy


National Petroleum Council

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 15, 2004, the Department of Energy published a notice 
of open meeting announcing a September 30, 2004, meeting of the 
National Petroleum Council 69 FR 55629.
    Today's notice is announcing the cancellation of that meeting.

    Issued in Washington, DC on September 24, 2004.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-21860 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
#### § 30.204 May I request that a formal probate proceeding be conducted instead of a summary probate proceeding?

No. Formal probate proceedings are available only for estates that contain trust or restricted land or contain trust personalty in an amount greater than $300.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 501.08

 501.28

 501.30

 501.02

 500.80

 500.69

 500.90

 500.83

 500.97

 501.37

 501.28

 501.32

 500.96

 501.46

 500.50

 500.38

 500.63

 501.06

 500.12

 499.17

 499.44

 499.59

 499.98

 500.44

 500.83

 500.44

 499.62

 500.05

 500.59

 500.48

 56,475

 56,696

 56,718

 56,409

 56,170

 56,051

 56,279

 56,203

 56,354

 56,795

 56,696

 56,740

 56,344

 56,894

 55,845

 55,715

 55,986

 56,453

 55,433

 54,417

 54,705

 54,866

 55,282

 55,780

 56,203

 55,780

 54,898

 55,357

 55,943

 55,823

STORAGE

+77

+221

+22

-309

-239

-119

+228

-76

+151

+441

-99

+44

-396

+550

-1,049

-130

+271

+467

-1,020

-1,016

+288

+161

+416

+498

+423

-423

-882

+459

+586

-120

CHANGE

1,930

1,136

761

450

432

487

659

499

605

751

481

567

360

832

13

468

676

772

23

30

676

625

717

711

675

249

16

712

826

476

INFLOW

 1,585

 1,020

 746

 605

 546

 545

 540

 536

 526

 525

 525

 542

 556

 550

 539

 534

 533

 535

 535

 534

 531

 542

 505

 460

 461

 461

 460

 478

 526

 533

POWER

 299

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 7

 5

 4

 1

 6

 2

 4

 1

 3

 4

 6

 3

 4

 5

 3

 0

 6

 2

 2

 8

 0

 2

 2

 0

 1

 1

 1

 3

 5

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/01/2011

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -575 17,615 17,514 299 0 94

ACRE-FEET -575 34,939 34,739 593 0 186

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 34,739

SPILL 593 35,332

 56,398

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,936

 1,161

 731

 470

 416

 488

 654

 488

 611

 743

 476

 558

 359

 822

 16

 466

 668

 762

 33

 16

 670

 619

 708

 700

 677

 246

 13

 712

 808

 468

 17,495

 34,701

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
#### Alma Siedentopf et al., as Executors of Hermine Guidez, Deceased, Respondents, v. Paul V. Braune et al., Appellants.

In this action based upon a guarantee in writing given by defendants to induce one Hermine Guidez, now deceased, represented in this action by the executors of the estate of the deceased, to purchase a $6,000 junior interest in a first mortgage of $28,000, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint and for judgment upon the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, pursuant to subdivision 5 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and pursuant to subdivision 6 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground that it appears upon the face of the complaint that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations, reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. The guarantee consists of two separate and independent guarantees, the first of which was to pay at the times and in the manner according to the instrument, and the second, a guarantee to pay any deficiency resulting after a foreclosure of the mortgage guaranteed. We are of opinion that the extension of the mortgage at its maturity, without the consent of the guarantors, discharged their obligation under the guarantee and, further, that in any event the surrender of the security by the deceased to the Bank of New York in lieu of foreclosure carried with it an assignment of the guarantee to the bank. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      10.4


**AMENDMENT
      NO. 1**


**TO
      THE**


**KERR-McGEE
      CORPORATION**


**EXECUTIVE
      DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN**


**Amended
      and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2003**








**WHEREAS,** the
      Kerr-McGee Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) was
      amended and restated in its entirety as of January 1, 2003;





**WHEREAS,** by
      the terms of Section 7.1 of the Plan, Kerr-McGee Corporation (the “Company”)
      reserves the right to amend the Plan at any time; and





**WHEREAS,** the
      Company desires to amend the Plan to remove the option gain deferral feature
      in
      order to comply with Internal Revenue Code section 409A and applicable guidance
      thereto.





**NOW,
      THEREFORE,** the Plan is amended as follows, effective January 1, 2005:





1.
            Section
                4.1 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence to the
                end
                thereto:





“Notwithstanding
      anything herein to the contrary, no deferral election on a Deferral Form may
      defer the receipt of all or any portion of the gain attributable to a stock
      option or stock appreciation right award that vests after 2004.”





2.
            The
                first sentence of Section 4.1(a) of the Plan is amended and restated
                in
                its entirety to read as follows:





“An
      Eligible Employee may elect to defer receipt of all or any portion of the gain
      attributable to a stock option or stock appreciation right award that vests
      before 2005.”








**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, KERR-MCGEE CORPORATION** has,
      on its behalf and on behalf of its participating affiliates, caused this
      amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 14 th day of December, 2005.





**ATTEST:**
            **KERR-McGEE
                CORPORATION**/s/
                John F. Reichenberger
            /s/
                Frances G. HeartwellJohn
                F.
                Reichenberger
            Frances
                G. HeartwellAssistant
                Secretary
            Vice
                President, Human Resources
#### Bessie W. Fairchild v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott, and Dowling, JJ.
§ 2885.12 What rights does a grant or TUP provide? The grant or TUP conveys to you only those rights which it expressly contains. BLM issues it subject to the valid existing rights of others, including the United States. Rights which the grant or TUP conveys to you include the right to: ( a ) Use the described lands to construct, operate, maintain, and terminate facilities within the right-of-way or TUP area for authorized purposes under the terms and conditions of the grant or TUP;
( b ) Allow others to use the land as your agent in the exercise of the rights that the grant or TUP specifies;
( c ) Do minor trimming, pruning, and removing of vegetation to maintain the right-of-way or TUP area or facility;
( d ) Use common varieties of stone and soil which are necessarily removed during construction of the pipeline, without additional BLM authorization or payment, in constructing the pipeline within the authorized right-of-way or TUP area; and
( e ) Assign the grant or TUP to another, provided that you obtain the BLM's prior written approval, unless your grant or TUP specifically states that such approval is unnecessary.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 73 FR 65073, Oct. 31, 2008]
§ 2462.4 Segregative effect of publication. ( a ) Publication in the Federal Register of a notice of proposed classification pursuant to § 2462.1 or of a notice of classification pursuant to § 2462.2 will segregate the affected land from all forms of disposal under the public land laws, including the mining laws except the form or forms of disposal for which it is proposed to classify the lands. However, publication will not alter the applicability of the public land laws governing the use of the lands under lease, license, or permit, or governing the disposal of their mineral and vegetative resources, other than under the mining laws.
( b ) The segregative effect of a proposed classification will terminate in one of the following ways: ( 1 ) Classification of the lands within 2 years of publication of the notice of proposed classification in the Federal Register;
( 2 ) Publication in the Federal Register of a notice of termination of the proposed classification;
( 3 ) An Act of Congress;
( 4 ) Expiration of a 2-year period from the date of publication of the notice of proposed classification without continuance as prescribed by the Classification and Multiple Use Act of September 19, 1964 (78 Stat. 986, 43 U.S.C. 1411-18), or expiration of an additional period, not exceeding 2 years, if the required notice of proposed continuance is given.
( c ) The segregative effect of a classification for sale or other disposal will terminate in one of the following ways: ( 1 ) Disposal of the lands;
( 2 ) Publication in the Federal Register of a notice of termination of the classification;
( 3 ) An Act of Congress;
( 4 ) Expiration of 2 years from the date of publication of the proposed classification without disposal of the land and without the notice of proposed continuance as prescribed by the Classification and Multiple Use Act; or
( 5 ) Expiration of an additional period, not exceeding 2 years, if the required notice of proposed continuance is given.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce R. York, Chief Financial Officer of MDRNA, Inc. (MDRNA), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of MDRNA on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MDRNA.



|                        |  |                               
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2008
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Bruce R. York             
|                        |  | Name: Bruce R. York           
|                        |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MDRNA and will be
retained by MDRNA and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by MDRNA for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
§ 18.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
## NUMBER 13

- 21

- 00 3 11

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE GEORGE ANDREW DAY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

.



## ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This Court issued its opinion in this case on October 29, 2021. See In re Day

, No.

13

- 21

- 00311

- CV, 2021 WL 5039735, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi Oct. 29, 2021, orig.

proceeding ) (mem. op.). Relator, George Andrew Day, has now filed a motion for

rehearing asserting that he met his burden to show that the trial court abused its discretion

in failing to timely rule on relator’s motion for an accounting.

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Jack R. Day, file a response to

relator’s mo tion for rehearing that directly addresses the issues raised in that motion.2

Such response is due within ten ( 10) days from the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

23 r d day of November , 202 1

.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

R115 W R114 W T

27

E

T

26

E

R3 3N

R3 2N

T

107

W

T

106

W

T

106

W

T

108

W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

APPROVED PINEDALE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

OHV Inventory Priority Areas

Map A17-1

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

1- Special Management Areas

2- Mesa/ South Colorado Desert

3- Upper Green/ Merna

4- Ryegrass/ Bench Corral/ Upper LaBarge

5- South LaBarge

Industrialized- constantly inventoried
#### In the Matter of Abraham Tauber, Appellant, against Board of Examiners of the Board of Education of the City of New York et al., Respondents.

Proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act for an order requiring the respondents to certify appellant as a first assistant in speech, to require them *815to proceed with, an examination for a first assistant in academic subjects in the high schools of the City of New York, and to annul determinations of respondents that appellant’s record was “ unsatisfactory ” in respect of one of these positions and “insufficiently meritorious” in respect of the other. Order *denying*appellant’s application unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
### §1961. Locally convenient day schools

#### (a) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that the absence of locally convenient day schools may contribute to the breakup of Indian families.

#### (b) Report to Congress; contents, etc.

The Secretary is authorized and directed to prepare, in consultation with appropriate agencies in the Department of Health and Human Services, a report on the feasibility of providing Indian children with schools located near their homes, and to submit such report to the Select Committee on Indian Affairs of the United States Senate and the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the United States House of Representatives within two years from November 8, 1978. In developing this report the Secretary shall give particular consideration to the provision of educational facilities for children in the elementary grades.

(Pub. L. 95–608, title IV, §401, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3078; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsec. (b), pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88 which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

Select Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate redesignated Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate by section 25 of Senate Resolution No. 71, Feb. 25, 1993, One Hundred Third Congress.

Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs of the House of Representatives changed to Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives on Jan. 5, 1993, by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Third Congress.
#### Ralph Beak, Appellant, v. John M. Walts et al., Respondents.

*901Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.