I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311 (b) to the extent required for Katherine

Margaret Dickens to be able to use an FAA Approved Chil d Restraint System even though she exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Katherine Margaret Dickens is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121 .311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Katherine Margaret Dickens to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system during use of that child restraint system aboard an aircraft. I believe the pertinent section fro m 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses. My daughter is 9 year’s old, weighs 48 pounds, and is 46 inches tall. My daughter’s ph ysical condition is as follows: severe mitochondrial encephalo pathy which has caused severe developmental delay, loss of vision and hearing, severe hypotonia , inability to sit or stand without restraints/wheelchair, inability to swallow and need for tubefeeding

. As a result of her physical condition, she needs the su pport and security provided by an FAA Approved C hild Restraint, but because of her weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation. **I am also submitting the following contact information: Margaret and Michael Dickens**  **700 Seville Road Denton, TX 762 05**  **(940)382**
**- 2434 home**  **(940)597**
**- 8717 cell**  **maggiedickens@live.com**

I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by ensuring that they are securely res trained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions. I propose that Katherine Margaret Dickens be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though she exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensu res a high level of safety for Katherine Margaret Dickens and a high level of safety for the other passengers and cre w on the airplane. In fact, in Katherine ’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight. Enhancing safety for Katherine Margaret Dickens is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System allows her to use commercial air transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Approved C hild Restra int System, she would be unable to fly commercially.I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be

an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CA RES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds. I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this might cause a hi gher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the p erson using the CARES restraint).
I propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of Katherine’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him or he r. In addition, I propose that Katherine’s parent or caregiver must carry a cop y of this exemption. I also request that the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the Feder al Register. We want to travel August 11, 2013

- August 17, 2013 . If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it wil l delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe. If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following: This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use a n FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. We request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), eve n though she exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for her during the flight.