alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

                                   EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Hybrid Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Holly
Roseberry, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                            /s/ Holly Roseberry
                                            ----------------------
                                            Holly Roseberry
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Principal Financial Officer

November 13, 2007


                                       44
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Verdisys, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David M. Adams, Co-Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ David M. Adams         
|David M. Adams             
|Co-Chief Executive Officer 
|Principal Executive Officer
|                           
|March 29, 2005
§ 3132.2 Submission of bids. ( a ) A separate sealed bid shall be submitted for each tract in the manner prescribed. A bid shall not be submitted for less than an entire tract.
( b ) Each bidder shall submit with the bid a certified or cashier's check, bank draft, U.S. currency or any other form of payment approved by the Secretary for one-fifth of the amount of the cash bonus, unless stated otherwise in the notice of sale.
( c ) Each bid shall be accompanied by statements of qualifications prepared in accordance with § 3132.4 of this title.
( d ) Bidders are bound by the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 1860 prohibiting unlawful combination or intimidation of bidders.
#### § 2372.2 Report to General Services Administration.

The holding agency will send one copy of its report on unneeded lands to the appropriate regional office of the General Services Administration for its information.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00424-CR

Ex parte Zaccheuas Albro

FROM THE 217TH DISTRICT COURT OF ANGELINA COUNTY

NO. 2022-0590, ROBERT KENNETH INSELMANN JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Zaccheuas Albro, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal regarding the denial of his 

application for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus by the trial court in Angelina County, Texas.

However, the criminal appellate jurisdiction vested in this Court by the Texas Constitution and 

the Code of Criminal Procedure is limited to counties in this Court’s appellate district. See Tex. 

Const., art. V, § 6 (providing that courts of appeals “shall have appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of their respective districts, which shall extend to all cases of which the 

District Courts or County Courts have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such restrictions 

and regulations as may be prescribed by law”); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 4.01 (establishing 

criminal jurisdiction in criminal actions in courts of appeals), .03 (providing that courts of 

appeals “shall have appellate jurisdiction coextensive with the limits of their respective districts 

in all criminal cases except those in which the death penalty has been assessed”). Angelina 

County lies outside this Court’s appellate district. Compare Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.201(d)

(listing twenty-four counties in Third Court’s district), with id. § 22.201(m) (including Angelina 

County in list of counties in Twelfth Court’s district). Because Angelina County is outside the 
2

boundaries of our district, we lack appellate jurisdiction in this matter, and we dismiss this 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); see also Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 

519, 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (listing section 22.201 of Government Code among examples 

of laws that establish jurisdiction of courts of appeals); Rodriguez v. State, 970 S.W.2d 133, 135 

(Tex. App.—Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d) (applying Rule 42.3 in criminal context).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Smith

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: July 20, 2023

Do Not Publish
#### § 2533.0-8 Land subject to allotment.

An allotment under this section may be made for lands containing coal and oil and gas with reservation of the mineral contents to the United States, but not for lands valuable for metalliferous minerals. The rules governing the conduct of fourth-section applications under the Act of February 8, 1887 as amended, apply equally to applications under said section 31.
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T17:09:38-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-13418

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTHFUND XXII, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 349

 342

 349

 334

 329

 313

 309

 311

 286

 289

 283

 274

 264

 262

 277

 284

 285

 286

 287

 300

 297

 305

 304

 312

 313

 296

 295

 301

 302

 305

 311

 313

 309

 304

 298

 292

 286

 279

 273

 267

 265

 260

 256

 251

 250

 249

 250

 255

 259

 261

 265

 269

 273

 276

 279

 281

 284

 286

 288

 290

 291

 291

 325

 318

 313

 309

 305

 297

 291

 284

 274

 272

 267

 262

 257

 254

 256

 260

 264

 267

 269

 274

 276

 282

 283

 285

 288

 288

 289

 292

 294

 297

 297

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 309 257 293

2 251 204 225

3 216 179 201

4 191 174 181

5 189 176 183

6 172 161 166

7 200 171 189

8 196 182 189

9 183 174 179

10 176 172 174

11 195 174 183

12 206 191 198

13 191 183 186

14 188 182 185

15 180 164 172

16 163 159 161

17 163 160 161

18 163 160 161

19 161 155 158

20 155 153 154

21 156 155 156

22 158 154 156

23 156 152 155

24 158 154 156

25 159 156 157

26 157 152 155

27 151 148 150

28 151 145 148

29 145 141 142

30 144 141 142

31 143 140 141

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Union Island On Old River At Middle River 

Period: March 2023 Run Date: 4/7/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,336.08

 2,336.01

 2,335.93

 2,335.92

 2,335.92

 2,335.87

 2,335.86

 2,335.83

 2,335.75

 2,335.67

 2,335.57

 2,335.46

 2,335.34

 2,335.22

 2,335.08

 2,335.00

 2,334.91

 2,334.79

 2,334.64

 2,334.48

 2,334.39

 2,334.26

 2,334.17

 2,334.07

 2,333.93

 2,333.81

 2,333.70

 2,333.58

 2,333.45

 2,333.24

 2,333.07

 1,930.3

 1,929.3

 1,928.2

 1,928.0

 1,928.0

 1,927.3

 1,927.2

 1,926.8

 1,925.6

 1,924.5

 1,923.1

 1,921.6

 1,919.9

 1,918.2

 1,916.2

 1,915.1

 1,913.8

 1,912.1

 1,910.0

 1,907.8

 1,906.5

 1,904.7

 1,903.4

 1,902.0

 1,900.0

 1,898.4

 1,896.8

 1,895.1

 1,893.3

 1,890.4

 1,888.0

STORAGE

+0.0

-1.0

-1.1

-0.1

+0.0

-0.7

-0.1

-0.4

-1.1

-1.1

-1.4

-1.6

-1.7

-1.7

-2.0

-1.1

-1.3

-1.7

-2.1

-2.2

-1.3

-1.8

-1.3

-1.4

-2.0

-1.7

-1.5

-1.7

-1.8

-2.9

-2.4

CHANGE

1,397

1,409

1,530

1,553

1,689

1,637

1,559

1,514

1,470

1,374

1,244

1,176

1,244

1,215

1,191

1,503

1,444

1,162

987

935

1,427

1,195

1,427

1,097

926

1,043

957

1,019

752

327

455

INFLOW

 1,326

 1,831

 1,996

 1,496

 1,618

 1,905

 1,527

 1,627

 1,924

 1,835

 1,877

 1,834

 1,991

 2,019

 2,021

 2,019

 2,023

 1,909

 1,962

 1,965

 1,965

 2,021

 1,965

 1,685

 1,837

 1,876

 1,641

 1,786

 1,561

 1,675

 1,517

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 71

 79

 104

 129

 71

 87

 104

 100

 116

 108

 79

 125

 108

 50

 166

 54

 58

 103

 87

 103

 99

 95

 99

 120

 78

 12

 91

 78

 107

 131

 135

C.F.S.

 .17

 .19

 .25

 .31

 .17

 .21

 .25

 .24

 .28

 .26

 .19

 .30

 .26

 .12

 .40

 .13

 .14

 .25

 .21

 .25

 .24

 .23

 .24

 .29

 .19

 .03

 .22

 .19

 .26

 .32

 .33

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .14

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .09

 .52

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2018 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -42.2 37,858 56,234 0 0 2,947 7.12 .92

ACRE-FEET -42,200 75,091 111,540 0 0 5,845

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 111,540

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 111,540

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .92

JULY 1, 2017 19.99

 1,930.3

Table 4

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 19.56
THE STATE OF TEXAS

MANDATE

TO THE 354TH DISTRICT COURT OF HUNT COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 6th 

day of October, A.D. 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment was 

determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Grayson David Smith, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

No. 06-15-00073-CR

Trial Court No. 29458

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to 

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Grayson David Smith, pay all costs of this appeal.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf, and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Josh R. Morriss, III, Chief Justice of our said Court of Appeals, with 

the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Texarkana, this the 2nd day of December, A.D. 2015.

DEBRA K. AUTREY, Clerk
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1042

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Kenneth Dean Becker lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________ Submitted: December 12, 2022 Filed: December 27, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Kenneth Dean Becker entered a conditional guilty plea for conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. He reserved theright to appeal the denial of a motion to suppress. We affirm the judgment of the

district court. 1 Officers executed a search warrant at Becker’s residence. Becker argues there was a lack of probable cause, officers violated procedural requirements under Nebraska law, and statements he made after the arrest were fruits of a poisonous tree. We review factual findings on the denial of motion to suppress for clear error and legal conclusions de novo. United States v. Thurmond, 782 F.3d 1042, 1044 (8th Cir. 2015). Probable cause for the search warrant existed. A cooperating witness told police that drug activity was occurring at a residence in Omaha. Investigators monitored a controlled buy between the cooperating witness and an individual at the residence. The evidence from the monitoring of the controlled buy demonstrated “a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime” was in the residence. Id. Although the affidavit did not specify the cooperating witness’s background, the buy was recorded with video and audio making the credibility issue largely immaterial. Next, even if a technical violation of Nebraska law occurred when signing the warrant that is not a basis for suppressing the evidence. United States v. Howard, 532 F.3d 755, 760 (8th Cir. 2008) (the Fourth Amendment, not state law, determines the admissibility of a search offered in a federal prosecution). 2 We affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

2 The pro se motion to amend the record is denied on the same grounds.
-2-
EXHIBIT 31

          CERTIFICATION TO BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPOSITOR WITH FORM 10-K

                  Re:    Soundview Home Loan Trust, Series 2005-2
                         Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2
                         ----------------------------------------

            I, Robert McGinnis, certify that:

            l. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports
on Form 8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Soundview Home
Loan Trust, Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2005-2;

            2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

            3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicers under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
these reports;

            4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement
included in the report and required to be delivered to the trustee in accordance
with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except
as disclosed in the reports, the servicers have fulfilled each of its
obligations under the servicing agreement; and

            5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers' compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or
similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

            In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Centex Home
Equity Company, LLC, Saxon Mortgage Services, Inc. and Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company.

                                         FINANCIAL ASSET SECURITIES CORP.

                                         By: /s/ Robert McGinnis
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Robert McGinnis
                                         Title: President
                                         Date:  March 30, 2006
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40858

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LEOCADIO NIETO-ZAPATA,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-80-1

- - - - - - - - - -

June 15, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Leocadio

Nieto-Zapata has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967). Although given notice, Nieto has filed no response to

the motion to dismiss. We have independently reviewed counsel’s

brief and the record and have found no nonfrivolous issues. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 
No. 

-2-

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXI–A—ALABAMA AND COUSHATTA INDIAN TRIBES OF TEXAS: RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 645

 636

 631

 627

 616

 611

 608

 597

 590

 588

 585

 585

 582

 578

 585

 583

 581

 583

 589

 600

 593

 596

 597

 597

 601

 606

 617

 614

 616

 614

 627

 621

 617

 610

 606

 600

 593

 585

 580

 577

 576

 572

 570

 569

 569

 569

 570

 572

 574

 575

 576

 580

 581

 584

 586

 592

 597

 599

 601

 603

 635

 629

 624

 618

 611

 604

 597

 591

 585

 581

 579

 577

 575

 572

 575

 574

 574

 575

 579

 582

 582

 585

 587

 589

 592

 597

 602

 603

 605

 607

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER