alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     I, James K. B. Hesketh, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canyon Resources Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and,     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.              /s/ James K. B. Hesketh   Date: August 13, 2007 James K. B. Hesketh, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4617 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4617

 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require 
that the Buy American purchase requirement for the school lunch program 
   include fish harvested within United States waters, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2016

   Ms. DelBene (for herself, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. McDermott, Ms. 
   Herrera Beutler, Mr. Heck of Washington, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Smith of 
  Washington, and Mr. Larsen of Washington) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 
                               Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require 
that the Buy American purchase requirement for the school lunch program 
   include fish harvested within United States waters, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DOMESTIC FISH REQUIRED FOR NATIONAL SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM.

    Section 12(n)(1) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(n)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) when used in the context of a fish or fish 
                product, a fish or fish product that substantially 
                contains--
                            ``(i) fish (including tuna) harvested 
                        within--
                                    ``(I) a State;
                                    ``(II) the District of Columbia; or
                                    ``(III) the Exclusive Economic Zone 
                                of the United States, as described in 
                                Presidential Proclamation 5030 (48 Fed. 
                                Reg. 10605; March 10, 1983); or
                            ``(ii) tuna harvested by a United States 
                        flagged vessel.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 2711.5-3 Notice of conveyance.

The authorized officer shall immediately notify the Governor and the heads of local government of the issuance of conveyance documents for public lands within their respective jurisdiction.

[45 FR 39418, June 10, 1980, as amended at 49 FR 29016, July 17, 1984]
§ 2091.2-2 Opening. ( a ) The segregative effect of a Notice of Realty Action automatically terminates either: ( 1 ) At the end of the periods set out in § 2091.2-1 of this title (See part 2740); or
( 2 ) As of the date specified in an opening order published in the Federal Register; or
( 3 ) Upon issuance of a patent or other document of conveyance; whichever occurs first.
( b ) [Reserved]
[52 FR 12175, Apr. 15, 1987, as amended at 58 FR 60917, Nov. 18, 1993; 65 FR 70112, Nov. 21, 2000]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-1430
CAROLYN WELLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BAE SYSTEMS NORFOLK SHIP REPAIR, formerly known as Norfolk Shipbuilding & Drydock Corporation; JOHN DOES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:05-cv-00573-RBS) Submitted: October 11, 2007 Decided: October 15, 2007 Before MICHAEL and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carolyn Wells, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Michael Lucas, Kristina Helen Vaquera, TROUTMAN & SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Carolyn Wells appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her disability discrimination claims brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000), and the Virginia Human Rights Act, Va. Code Ann. §§ 2.2-3900-2.2-3902 (2005). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wells v. BAE Sys. Norfolk Ship Repair , No. 2:05-cv00573-RBS (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4681 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide greater support 

to students with dependents, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 3, 2016 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 

greater support to students with dependents, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Access 

5 Means Parents in School Reauthorization Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘CCAMPIS Reauthorization Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO CCAMPIS. 

8 Section 419N of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

9 (20 U.S.C. 1070e) is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4681 IH

1 (1) in subsection (e)— 

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by amending sub3 paragraph (B) to read as follows: 

4 ‘‘(B) CONTENTS.—To ensure that the re5 ports submitted under paragraph (1) collect rel6 evant data on the program under this section 

7 and its impact, the Secretary shall determine 

8 the contents of such reports after consultation 

9 with relevant stakeholders.’’; and 

10 (B) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(3) PUBLICATION OF REPORTS.—Not later 

12 than 1 year after the first report is submitted under 

13 paragraph (1), as amended by the CCAMPIS Reau14 thorization Act, and annually thereafter, the Sec15 retary shall publish the reports submitted under 

16 paragraph (1) for the preceding year on the public 

17 website of the Department.’’; and 

18 (2) by amending subsection (g) to read as fol19 lows: 

20 ‘‘(g) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

21 are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section 

22 $67,000,000 for fiscal year 2017 and each succeeding fis23 cal year.’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4681 IH

1 SEC. 3. REPORT BY OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDU2 CATION. 

3 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

4 of this Act, the Secretary of Education (acting through 

5 the Office of Postsecondary Education) shall report to 

6 Congress on the plans of the Department of Education 

7 to better serve postsecondary students with dependents. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 686.410 Are there additional factors which are considered in selecting an eligible applicant for enrollment? Yes, in accordance with procedures issued by the Secretary, an eligible applicant may be selected for enrollment only if: ( a ) A determination is made, based on information relating to the background, needs, and interests of the applicant, that the applicant's educational and career and technical needs can best be met through the Job Corps program;
( b ) A determination is made that there is a reasonable expectation the applicant can participate successfully in group situations and activities, and is not likely to engage in actions that would potentially: ( 1 ) Prevent other students from receiving the benefit of the program;
( 2 ) Be incompatible with the maintenance of sound discipline; or
( 3 ) Impede satisfactory relationships between the center to which the student is assigned and surrounding local communities;
( c ) The applicant is made aware of the center's rules, what the consequences are for failure to observe the rules, and agrees to comply with such rules, as described in procedures issued by the Secretary;
( d ) The applicant has not been convicted of a felony consisting of murder, child abuse, or a crime involving rape or sexual assault. Other than these felony convictions, no one will be denied enrollment in Job Corps solely on the basis of contact with the criminal justice system. All applicants must submit to a background check conducted according to procedures established by the Secretary and in accordance with applicable State and local laws. If the background check finds that the applicant is on probation, parole, under a suspended sentence, or under the supervision of any agency as a result of court action or institutionalization, the court or appropriate supervising agency may certify in writing that it will approve of the applicant's participation in Job Corps, and provide full release from its supervision, and that the applicant's participation and release does not violate applicable laws and regulations; and
( e ) Suitable arrangements are made for the care of any dependent children for the proposed period of enrollment.
#### Alexander Jay Bruen, Respondent, v. Thomas L. Reynolds, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. -Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scotland Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### George B. Hayes, Appellant, v. Andrew B. McGinnis and Another, as Executors, etc., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
**Exhibit 10.3****CHANGE IN CONTROL RETENTION BONUS PLAN**April 27, 2006To:      [Executive Officer Name & Title]As previously reported, Michaels Stores, Inc. (the “Company”) is currently exploringstrategic alternatives, including the sale of the Company, to enhance the value to itsstakeholders. In your role as a key employee of the Company and to motivate your continuedemployment with the Company in good standing, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved aone-time Change in Control bonus to you in the amount of $125,000 (“Bonus”) in connection with yourcontinued dedication to the Company during its ongoing review of strategic alternatives. Toreceive your Bonus, you must be actively employed by the Company at the time of the Change inControl (as defined in the Michaels Stores, Inc. 2005 Incentive Compensation Plan). Payment of theBonus will be made by the Company on the one year anniversary of the Change in Control. If you areterminated as a result of the Change in Control prior to the one year anniversary, you will be paida lump sum payment in the amount of your Bonus within 10 business days of your termination date,provided that you were employed by the Company on the date of the Change in Control.This Bonus shouldbe viewed as an indication of the Company’s confidence in andappreciation of yourabilities, and as an additional form of compensation to meet a special need. The Bonus is not aguarantee of continued employment or a permanent or recurring element of your compensation, norwill it impact any other element of your compensation for which you may otherwise be eligible.The terms of this Bonus are to be kept strictly confidential, until such time as these terms aremade public by the Company when required by applicable law. Nothing shall prevent the Company fromdisclosing the terms of this Bonus to a potential purchaser of the Company or otherwise.Your rights under this Bonus shall be personal and are not subject to any additional conditions orrequirements. You may rely on the terms set forth in this Bonus Plan, and the Company may notadversely amend or modify your rights, or terminate your Bonus, without your prior written consent.Upon a Change in Control, the Company shall administer the terms of your Bonus in the ordinarycourse of its business, and any successor to the business or the assets of the Company shall bebound by the terms of this Bonus Plan to the same extent that the Company would have otherwise beenobligated to you. In the event that any successor would not be required to be bound by the termsof this Bonus Plan under applicable law, the Company shall use its best efforts to require suchsuccessor to expressly and unconditionally assume and agree to perform the Company’s obligationsunder this Bonus Plan, in the same manner and to the same extent that the Company would have beenrequired to perform such obligations if no such succession would have taken place.Sincerely,
EXHIBIT
31.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Daniel
R. Furth, certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this
annual report on Form 10-KSB of Health Discovery Corporation (the
“Registrant”);





2.  Based on my knowledge,
this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.  Based on my knowledge,
the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this annual report;





4.  The Registrant’s other
certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e))
for the Registrant and have:





a)  designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;





b)  evaluated the
effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;





5.  The Registrant’s other
certifying officers and I have disclosed, base on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the
audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





a)  all significant
deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and





b)  any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  March
      31, 2008
            /s/ Daniel R.
      FurthDaniel
      R. FurthPrincipal
      Financial Officer
---

logo 1


FAX (303) 623-4258621 SEVENTEENTH STREET
SUITE 1550
DENVER, COLORADO 80293
TELEPHONE (303) 623-9147








Exhibit No. 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





As independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the reference of our name in the Report on Form 10-K for the years ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 of PDC 2005A (the "Partnership"). We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in the Partnership, or in any affiliate. We have not been employed on a contingent basis, and we are not connected with the Partnership, or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, employee or affiliate.








signature 1RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP








Denver, Colorado


March 26, 2010








1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218
TEL (713)651-9191
FAX (713)651-08491200, 530-8TH AVENUE, S.W.
CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 3S8
TEL (403) 262-2799
FAX (403) 262-2790
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4010 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4010

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, as the ``Ed Pastor Post 
                                Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ED PASTOR POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 522 North Central Avenue in Phoenix, Arizona, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Ed Pastor Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ed Pastor 
Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### §1635. Repealed. Pub. L. 100–713, title III, §303(b), Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4817

Section, Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(c) [title II, §201], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1837, 1865, related to renovation and modernization of facilities.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Everyone: 

···:·· . ., ryf! AC~ r~·· (\f"' · · · i '/!.\'\ il<iCI\i )!' Martm, M1chael (OST) . .

1 .. ;t;D('1Crf~\TION 

Wednesday, July 11, 2012 6:25 PM · . /d/nBt:rl~TlC\~\1':; 

'Jim Lynaugh Olynaugh@kearneygov.org)'; 'Stanley Clm:Jsttrriay~r@l<ea~·~eygov.org)'; 

'Mike Sharkey (msharkey@hamilton.n~t):; 'Western. ~-~?fas kiT R1~0fl5~~PG:f2 

(wnra@flyscottsbluff.com)'; 'Randy Me1nmger (rmemu'igrer@scotf~biJff.org)'­

'mmatthews@flygreatlakes.com'; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Essential Air Service at Kearney, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, NE 

Great Lakes BFF EAR LBF Bid 07-10-12.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Kearney, North Platte, and Scottsbluff, and give 

you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secret'ary 

for Aviation and International Affai'rs. We issued Order 2012-6-2, June 5, 2012, requesting proposals from airlines 

interested in providing EAS for a new term at the above-mentioned communities. In 'response to our request, Great 

Lakes, the incumbent, was the only air carrier to submit a proposal. 

I have attached Great Lakes' proposal for your review. I expect the airline:s proposal to be uploaded on 

www.regulations.gov by tomorrow. I request that you review the proposal and submit any comments you may have as 

soon as possible, but no later than Wednesday, July 25. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at 

michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all rel.evant parties. 

t' I 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1
#### Anna S. Gwydir, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Albert Cowdell, Jr., Respondent.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ. [See *post,*p. 974.]