alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, NCI Review of Program Project Grant Application.
    Date: October 10-11, 2004.
    Time: 6 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: William D. Merritt, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8034, 
MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-9767.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)
    Dated: September 22, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-21711 Filed 9-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Alfonso ESPINOZA-CORTEZ, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-30148.

D.C. No. CR-00-00325-KI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 12, 2006.*

Decided Jan. 20, 2006.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, KLEINFELD, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Alfonso Espinoza-Cortez (“Espinoza”) appeals his 102-month sentence resulting *493from his guilty plea to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We affirm.

Espinoza first argues that the district court committed plain error in using the 2003 version of the Sentencing Guidelines instead of the 1998 version of the Guidelines. The record reflects that the district court considered both versions of the guidelines and that the sentencing range was the same under either. We need not decide whether the district court erred, because Espinoza cannot show that any alleged error affected his substantial rights.1

Espinoza also argues that *United States v. Booket*
      *2*
      **overruled or narrowed *Almendarez -Torres v. United States,*
      *3*
      **and that prior convictions must be proved to a jury. We are bound by *United States v. Weiland*
      *4*
      **to reject this argument.

Espinoza’s argument that he did not have notice that the judge could impose a consecutive sentence is also unpersuasive. Notice was apparent from the plea colloquy, the presentence report, and the United States’s Sentencing Memorandum, and such notice is sufficient.5 The district court was aware of its authority to impose a concurrent sentence but chose to do otherwise. It concluded from the record that Espinoza was a danger to the community based on his escalating path of violence and his long, recidivist criminal career. The district court did not abuse its discretion. For the same reasons, the district court’s sentence was reasonable within the meaning of *Booker.*
      *6*

The sentence is therefore AFFIRMED in all respects.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

. *See United States v. Sanders,*421 F.3d 1044, 1050 (9th Cir.2005).

. *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

. *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998).

. *See United States v. Weiland,*420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005).

. *See United States v. Williams,*291 F.3d 1180, 1193 (9th Cir.2002) (per curiam).

. *Booker,*125 S.Ct. at 765.
MANAGEMENT'S ASSERTION CONCERNING COMPLIANCE
                      WITH USAP MINIMUM SERVICING STANDARDS


March 7, 2003

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2002, BA Mortgage LLC, and the
Mortgage division of Bank of America, N.A. (collectively, the "Company"), which
together comprise an operating division of Bank of America, N.A., has complied
in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for
Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $400,000,000 and $475,000,000
respectively.


----------------------------              ------------------------------
Kevin M. Shannon                          H. Randall Chestnut
President                                 Senior Vice President
Consumer Real Estate                      Bank of America, N.A.
Bank of America, N.A.


-----------------------------             ------------------------------
David H. Rupp                             Gary K. Bettin
Senior Vice President                     Senior Vice President and
Bank of America, N.A.                     National Servicing Executive
                                          Bank of America, N.A.


----------------------------
J. Mark Hanson
Senior Vice President
Bank of America, N.A.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,318.01

 2,317.66

 2,317.31

 2,317.01

 2,316.71

 2,316.26

 2,315.90

 2,315.58

 2,315.23

 2,314.91

 2,314.61

 2,314.28

 2,313.95

 2,313.59

 2,313.18

 2,312.77

 2,312.37

 2,312.00

 2,311.66

 2,311.34

 2,311.02

 2,310.62

 2,310.32

 2,309.98

 2,309.60

 2,309.21

 2,308.73

 2,308.31

 2,308.04

 2,307.88

 2,307.62

 1,685.4

 1,680.9

 1,676.4

 1,672.5

 1,668.6

 1,662.8

 1,658.2

 1,654.1

 1,649.6

 1,645.5

 1,641.7

 1,637.5

 1,633.3

 1,628.7

 1,623.5

 1,618.3

 1,613.3

 1,608.6

 1,604.4

 1,600.3

 1,596.3

 1,591.3

 1,587.6

 1,583.3

 1,578.6

 1,573.8

 1,567.8

 1,562.6

 1,559.3

 1,557.3

 1,554.1

STORAGE

-6.2

-4.5

-4.5

-3.9

-3.9

-5.8

-4.6

-4.1

-4.5

-4.1

-3.8

-4.2

-4.2

-4.6

-5.2

-5.2

-5.0

-4.7

-4.3

-4.0

-4.0

-5.0

-3.7

-4.2

-4.7

-4.8

-5.9

-5.2

-3.3

-2.0

-3.2

CHANGE

-32

301

-127

-130

-85

-193

-56

189

-30

-23

57

-47

57

-17

-114

-146

-213

-84

154

134

95

-53

164

337

-56

-52

11

130

105

227

126

INFLOW

 2,984

 2,460

 2,010

 1,677

 1,746

 2,594

 2,165

 2,151

 2,130

 1,924

 1,861

 1,988

 2,101

 2,158

 2,396

 2,349

 2,227

 2,174

 2,224

 2,089

 1,998

 2,359

 1,931

 2,363

 2,214

 2,271

 2,899

 2,642

 1,685

 1,140

 1,636

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 134

 126

 148

 152

 118

 136

 113

 106

 102

 117

 124

 86

 75

 127

 112

 119

 104

 96

 81

 70

 122

 107

 121

 114

 110

 120

 109

 105

 102

 80

 101

C.F.S.

 .35

 .33

 .39

 .40

 .31

 .36

 .30

 .28

 .27

 .31

 .33

 .23

 .20

 .34

 .30

 .32

 .28

 .26

 .22

 .19

 .33

 .29

 .33

 .31

 .30

 .33

 .30

 .29

 .28

 .22

 .28

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2007 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 17, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -137.3 629 66,546 0 0 3,437 9.23 .04

ACRE-FEET -137,300 1,248 131,994 0 0 6,817

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 131,994

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 131,994

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .04

JULY 1, 2007 .52

 1,691.7

Table 4

(1) (1)
§ 3137.84 What must I submit to BLM to establish a new participating area, or modify an existing participating area? To establish a new participating area or modify an existing participating area, you must submit to BLM a— ( a ) Statement that— ( 1 ) The well meets the productivity criteria (see § 3137.82 of this subpart), necessary to establish a new participating area. You must submit information supporting your statement; or
( 2 ) Explains the reasons for modifying an existing participating area. You must submit information supporting your explanation;
( b ) Map showing the new or revised participating area and acreage; and
( c ) Schedule that establishes the production allocation for each NPR-A lease or tract, and each record title holder and operating rights owner in the participating area. You must submit a separate allocation schedule for each participating area.
#### § 2912.0-7 Cross reference.

The general requirements and procedures under the Recreation and Public Purposes Act are contained in part 2740 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 508.30

 508.47

 508.90

 509.15

 508.86

 508.66

 508.65

 508.64

 508.84

 509.08

 508.63

 508.14

 507.82

 507.79

 507.39

 507.92

 507.34

 506.97

 506.39

 506.00

 505.99

 505.58

 505.27

 504.82

 505.04

 504.94

 504.76

 506.06

 505.66

 505.60

 64,858

 65,068

 65,597

 65,907

 65,548

 65,301

 65,289

 65,277

 65,523

 65,820

 65,265

 64,661

 64,271

 64,234

 63,750

 64,392

 63,689

 63,241

 62,549

 62,083

 62,071

 61,589

 61,225

 60,699

 60,954

 60,838

 60,629

 62,155

 61,683

 61,613

STORAGE

-899

+210

+529

+310

-359

-247

-12

-12

+246

+297

-555

-604

-390

-37

-484

+642

-703

-448

-692

-466

-12

-482

-364

-526

+255

-116

-209

+1,526

-472

-70

CHANGE

1,073

1,619

1,780

1,795

1,449

1,468

1,570

1,595

1,628

1,479

1,261

1,466

1,524

1,671

1,417

1,964

1,337

1,421

1,286

1,385

1,727

1,530

1,531

1,450

1,938

1,777

1,669

2,445

1,352

1,236

INFLOW

 1,510

 1,498

 1,494

 1,623

 1,615

 1,578

 1,564

 1,589

 1,491

 1,315

 1,527

 1,755

 1,712

 1,682

 1,656

 1,631

 1,680

 1,635

 1,623

 1,610

 1,727

 1,760

 1,698

 1,700

 1,798

 1,820

 1,759

 1,661

 1,580

 1,265

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 16

 15

 19

 16

 15

 15

 12

 12

 13

 14

 14

 16

 9

 8

 5

 9

 11

 12

 12

 10

 6

 13

 17

 15

 11

 15

 15

 15

 10

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/01/2009

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4,144 46,843 48,556 0 0 376

ACRE-FEET -4,144 92,913 96,311 0 0 746

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 96,311

SPILL 0 96,311

 65,757

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,085

 1,619

 1,754

 1,801

 1,447

 1,482

 1,551

 1,599

 1,656

 1,462

 1,257

 1,480

 1,522

 1,674

 1,418

 1,928

 1,349

 1,376

 1,296

 1,400

 1,702

 1,533

 1,526

 1,454

 1,932

 1,756

 1,669

 2,406

 1,349

 1,247

 46,730

 92,689

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

OHV Designations

Map 2-21

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Red Dugway

Road

Alternative 2

Open

Limited to Existing Roads

Limited to Designated

Closed

Seasonal Limitations
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 168

 166

 162

 166

 163

 157

 164

 165

 164

 157

 147

 157

 150

 161

 148

 148

 147

 153

 151

 161

 171

 158

 151

 162

 150

 150

 149

 157

 162

 151

 160

 140

 142

 142

 144

 141

 140

 142

 140

 136

 132

 135

 136

 136

 135

 132

 132

 132

 133

 135

 135

 135

 134

 134

 133

 129

 130

 128

 130

 134

 136

 137

 151

 151

 150

 151

 146

 144

 147

 147

 144

 144

 142

 142

 141

 141

 139

 138

 138

 140

 141

 142

 147

 144

 145

 146

 139

 137

 137

 139

 144

 143

 143

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 21, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### Merle E. Jacobs, as Administrator of the Estate of Henry A. Jacobs, Deceased, Appellant, v. Ella L. Jack, Respondent.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Iowa First  Bancshares  Corp.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, D.
Scott Ingstad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ D. Scott Ingstad
----------------------
D. Scott Ingstad
Chairman of the Board,
President and CEO


November 15, 2004


                                       1
§ 2310.1-3 Submission of withdrawal petitions. ( a ) Withdrawal petitions shall be submitted to the Director, Bureau of Land Management, for transmittal to the Secretary.
( b ) No specific form is required, but the petition shall contain at least the following information: ( 1 ) The office originating the petition;
( 2 ) The type and purpose of the proposed withdrawal action (See § 2300.0-5(h) of this title) and whether the petition pertains to the making, extension or modification of a withdrawal;
( 3 ) A legal description of the entire land area that falls within the exterior boundaries affected by the petition, together with the total acreage of such lands, and a map of the area;
( 4 ) The extent to which and the time during which any public lands that may be involved in the petition would be temporarily segregated and the temporary land uses that may be permitted during the segregation period, in accordance with § 2310.2 of this title; and
( 5 ) A preliminary identification of the mineral resources in the area.
( c ) Except in the case of petitions seeking emergency withdrawals, if a petition is submitted simultaneously with a withdrawal application, the information requirements pertaining to withdrawal applications (See § 2310.1-2 of this title), shall supersede the requirements of this section.
( d ) If a petition seeks an emergency withdrawal under the provisions of section 204(e) of the act, the petition shall be filed simultaneously with an application for withdrawal. In such instances, the petition/application shall provide as much of the information required by §§ 2310.1-2(c) and 2310.3-2(b) of this title as is available to the petitioner when the petition is submitted.
( e ) Upon the approval by the Secretary of a petition for withdrawal, the petition shall be considered as a Secretarial proposal for withdrawal, and notice of the withdrawal proposal shall be published immediately in the Federal Register in accordance with § 2310.3-1(a) of this title. If a petition which seeks an emergency withdrawal is approved by the Secretary, the publication and notice provisions pertaining to emergency withdrawals shall be applicable. (See § 2310.5 of this title.)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-7316

GRADY PARKER, JR., Claimant-Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secret ary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

Grady Parker, Jr. , of Highland Park, Michigan, pro se. Steven M. Mager , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Ju stice, of Washington, DC, fo r respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, Harold D. Lester, Jr. , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were Dean E. Gallin , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and F. John Brizzi, Jr. , Attorney, United States Departm ent of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC. Appealed from: United States Cour t of Appeals for Veterans Claims Judge Bruce E. KasoldNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-7316

GRADY PARKER, JR., Claimant-Appellant,

v. JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secret ary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veter ans Claims in 05-3609, Judge Bruce E. Kasold.

__________ ________________ DE CIDED: March 5, 2008

__________________________

Before MAYER, GAJARSA and MOORE, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM. Grady Parker, Jr. appeals the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”), which affirmed the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“board”) decision denying his claim for vocational rehabilitation benefits for the period during which his vocational goal was found to be infeasible, and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction his appeal regarding his cl aim for a compensable rating for serviceconnected hypertensive vascular disease. Parker v. Nicholson , No. 05-3609 (Vet. App. July 31, 2007). Because we lack authority to review either “a challenge to a factual2007-7316 2 determination” or “a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case” absent a constitutional issue, 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2), we dismiss the portion of his appeal regarding the denial of retroactive vocati onal rehabilitatio n benefits.

The board did not reach the substance of his compensable rating claim for service-connected hypertensive vascular dis ease, because it remanded a threshold procedural issue—whether Park er’s notice of disagreement to an April 13, 2000, Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office rating decision was timely filed in

accordance with 38 U.S. C. § 7105 and 38 C.F. R. §§ 19.29, 19.30. Because the Veterans Court has jurisdiction only over fi nal board decisions, it was correct to dismiss Parker’s appeal with respect to his clai m for service connection for hypertensive vascular disease. Accordingly, we affirm that portion of the judgment.
### §1773. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–41, §2, June 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 83, which set out congressional findings and purpose, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 101–41, §1, June 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 83, provided that Pub. L. 101–41, enacting this subchapter and provisions formerly set out as a note under section 1773a of this title, could be cited as the "Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989".
§ 2091.5-6 Congressional withdrawals and opening of lands. ( a ) Congressional withdrawals become effective and are terminated as specified in the statute making the withdrawal. If the statute does not specify the date, duration and extent of segregation, the Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a Public Land Order so specifying.
( b ) If the statute does not specify when and to what extent the lands are to be opened, the Secretary publishes in the Federal Register an opening order so specifying.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the periodic report of American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Nicole S. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company, and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 16, 2005 |  | /S/ NICOLE S. WILLIAMS 
|                     |  | Nicole S. Williams     
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### KUETER, Appellant, v. McFARLAND, County Treasurer of Minnehaha County, Respondent.

(207 N. W. 984.)

(File No. 5815.

Opinion filed March 12, 1926.)

Appeal from Circuit Court, Minnehaha County; Hon. Herbert B. Rudolph, Judge.

*Mundt & Mundt,*of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*Hugh S. Gamble*and *Lucius J. Wall,*both of Sioux Falls, lor Respondent.

CAMPBELL, J.

Petitioner sought mandamus to compel defendant to issue tax receipts, and appeals to this court from an order sustaining the defendant's demurrer to. the petition.

The order appealed from is affirmed on the authority of Scheafer v. McFarland, 49 S. D. 605, 207 N. W. 982, this day decided.
#### In the Matter of Sharon M. Scriven. Marion A. S. Scriven, Respondent; Leroy Woodruff, Appellant.

All concur.