alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40946 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CARLOS FRANCO-SOLANO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:05-CR-1077-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos FrancoSolano raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
### §1911. Indian tribe jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings

#### (a) Exclusive jurisdiction

An Indian tribe shall have jurisdiction exclusive as to any State over any child custody proceeding involving an Indian child who resides or is domiciled within the reservation of such tribe, except where such jurisdiction is otherwise vested in the State by existing Federal law. Where an Indian child is a ward of a tribal court, the Indian tribe shall retain exclusive jurisdiction, notwithstanding the residence or domicile of the child.

#### (b) Transfer of proceedings; declination by tribal court

In any State court proceeding for the foster care placement of, or termination of parental rights to, an Indian child not domiciled or residing within the reservation of the Indian child's tribe, the court, in the absence of good cause to the contrary, shall transfer such proceeding to the jurisdiction of the tribe, absent objection by either parent, upon the petition of either parent or the Indian custodian or the Indian child's tribe: Provided, That such transfer shall be subject to declination by the tribal court of such tribe.

#### (c) State court proceedings; intervention

In any State court proceeding for the foster care placement of, or termination of parental rights to, an Indian child, the Indian custodian of the child and the Indian child's tribe shall have a right to intervene at any point in the proceeding.

#### (d) Full faith and credit to public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of Indian tribes

The United States, every State, every territory or possession of the United States, and every Indian tribe shall give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of any Indian tribe applicable to Indian child custody proceedings to the same extent that such entities give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of any other entity.

(Pub. L. 95–608, title I, §101, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3071.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.33

 509.05

 509.07

 508.52

 508.49

 509.28

 509.92

 508.52

 509.11

 508.85

 508.35

 508.34

 509.22

 508.70

 508.18

 508.59

 508.99

 508.78

 509.34

 508.97

 508.44

 507.94

 508.38

 507.96

 508.58

 508.16

 508.98

 508.52

 508.51

 509.07

 508.99

 64,895

 65,782

 65,807

 65,129

 65,092

 66,069

 66,868

 65,129

 65,857

 65,535

 64,920

 64,908

 65,995

 65,351

 64,711

 65,215

 65,708

 65,449

 66,144

 65,683

 65,031

 64,416

 64,957

 64,441

 65,203

 64,686

 65,695

 65,129

 65,117

 65,807

 65,708

STORAGE

+221

+887

+25

-678

-37

+977

+799

-1,739

+728

-322

-615

-12

+1,087

-644

-640

+504

+493

-259

+695

-461

-652

-615

+541

-516

+762

-517

+1,009

-566

-12

+690

-99

CHANGE

2,115

2,428

1,977

1,623

1,879

2,343

2,263

885

2,120

1,604

1,489

1,794

2,345

1,506

1,517

2,095

2,084

1,731

2,202

1,611

1,532

1,552

2,136

1,624

2,202

1,541

2,318

1,502

1,765

2,029

1,576

INFLOW

 1,891

 1,897

 1,898

 1,898

 1,866

 1,840

 1,843

 1,748

 1,740

 1,753

 1,786

 1,788

 1,788

 1,815

 1,826

 1,829

 1,820

 1,850

 1,838

 1,829

 1,845

 1,850

 1,850

 1,871

 1,804

 1,783

 1,793

 1,771

 1,758

 1,668

 1,616

POWER

 98

 69

 50

 50

 17

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 15

 15

 16

 17

 15

 10

 17

 14

 13

 13

 13

 12

 9

 16

 14

 12

 15

 12

 14

 14

 16

 12

 13

 13

 14

 19

 16

 16

 13

 13

 10

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2010 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/08/2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,034 57,388 56,152 284 0 431

ACRE-FEET +1,034 113,829 111,377 563 0 855

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 111,377

SPILL 563 111,940

 64,674

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,180

 2,406

 2,004

 1,640

 1,887

 2,378

 1,616

 1,518

 2,140

 1,572

 1,486

 1,824

 2,329

 1,525

 1,535

 2,078

 2,080

 1,745

 2,209

 1,597

 1,558

 1,567

 2,118

 1,638

 2,204

 1,561

 2,294

 1,523

 1,763

 2,039

 1,572

 57,586

 114,222

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND 

EVAPORATION.
#### § 704.102 Commutation of payments to aliens and nonresidents.

Authority to commute payments to aliens and nonnationals who are not residents of the United States and Canada, section 2(b) of the Defense Base Act, 42 U.S.C. 1652(b), though separately stated in this Act, is identical in language to section 9(g) of the Longshoremen's Act. Thus, except for the different statutory citation, the LHWCA regulation at § 702.142 of this subchapter shall apply.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board ofDirectors

Landmark Bancorp, Inc.:

Weconsent to incorporation by reference in the Registration StatementNo. 333-103091 on Form S-8 of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. ofour report dated March 29, 2007, relating to the consolidated balance sheets ofLandmark Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the relatedconsolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensiveincome, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annualreport on Form 10-K of Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
| /s/ KPMG LLP          |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |
|                  |
| Kansas City, Missouri |
| March 29, 2007   |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 534

 591

 582

 555

 501

 687

 623

 786

 636

 349

 277

 341

 362

 360

 339

 329

 330

 359

 320

 316

 233

 274

 380

 348

 328

 333

 345

 358

 357

 345

 346

 367

 394

 390

 415

 426

 433

 472

 560

 233

 218

 241

 255

 246

 226

 227

 243

 261

 263

 246

 207

 189

 237

 234

 215

 258

 292

 293

 326

 304

 303

 315

 452

 451

 467

 488

 471

 535

 555

 697

 456

 276

 261

 307

 329

 297

 277

 284

 298

 310

 290

 267

 208

 257

 305

 289

 302

 309

 323

 343

 326

 322

 334

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
#### § 3160.0-4 Objectives.

The objective of these regulations is to promote the orderly and efficient exploration, development and production of oil and gas.

[48 FR 36583, Aug. 12, 1983]
#

#

#

# #

#

#

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

APPROVED PINEDALE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC)

Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)

Wild and Scenic River Unit (WSR)

Sensitive Cultural Site

# Known Locations of Special Status Plants

Land Withdrawals

Map 2-34

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

New Fork

Potholes ACEC

CCC

Ponds

SRMA

Trapper's

Point

ACEC

East Fork

Unit WSR
### §4192. Security and repayment

#### (a) Requirements on issuer

To assure the repayment of notes or other obligations and charges incurred under this subchapter and as a condition for receiving such guarantees, the Secretary shall require the Indian tribe or housing entity issuing such notes or obligations to—

(1) enter into a contract, in a form acceptable to the Secretary, for repayment of notes or other obligations guaranteed under this subchapter;

(2) pledge any grant for which the issuer may become eligible under this chapter;

(3) demonstrate that the extent of such issuance and guarantee under this subchapter is within the financial capacity of the tribe and is not likely to impair the ability to use grant amounts under subchapter I, taking into consideration the requirements under section 4133(b) of this title; and

(4) furnish, at the discretion of the Secretary, such other security as may be deemed appropriate by the Secretary in making such guarantees, including increments in local tax receipts generated by the activities assisted under this chapter or disposition proceeds from the sale of land or rehabilitated property.

#### (b) Repayment from grant amounts

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter—

(1) the Secretary may apply grants pledged pursuant to subsection (a)(2) to any repayments due the United States as a result of such guarantees; and

(2) grants allocated under this chapter for an Indian tribe or housing entity (including program income derived therefrom) may be used to pay principal and interest due (including such servicing, underwriting, and other costs as may be specified in regulations issued by the Secretary) on notes or other obligations guaranteed pursuant to this subchapter.

#### (c) Full faith and credit

The full faith and credit of the United States is pledged to the payment of all guarantees made under this subchapter. Any such guarantee made by the Secretary shall be conclusive evidence of the eligibility of the obligations for such guarantee with respect to principal and interest, and the validity of any such guarantee so made shall be incontestable in the hands of a holder of the guaranteed obligations.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VI, §602, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4046.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 26, 1996, see section 606 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4191 of this title.
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

Audacy, Inc. 
 Non-employee Director Compensation Policy 
 Cash Compensation: 

Annual Board Retainer: $80,000 per year. 

Committee Non-chair / Membership Fee: 

 

	 	•	 	 Audit Committee - $20,000 per year 



 

	 	•	 	 Compensation Committee - $15,000 per year; and 



 

	 	•	 	 Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee - $10,000 per year. 



Committee Chair / Membership Fee: 
  

	 	•	 	 Audit Committee Chair - $35,000 per year; 



 

	 	•	 	 Compensation Committee Chair - $25,000 per year; and 



 

	 	•	 	 Nominating/Corporate Governance Chair - $15,000 per year. 



Independent Lead Director (if applicable): $25,000 per year 

Payment: The Board Retainer, Committee Membership Fees and Committee Chair Fees shall be paid in equal quarterly installments on
May 31, August 31, November 30 and February 28 following election to the board, committee or chair position, as applicable. 

Equity Compensation: An annual grant of $120,000 in shares of restricted stock to be granted promptly following the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders in the form previously approved by the Compensation Committee and vest after one year. The number of shares will be computed based on the closing price of the Company’s stock at the end of the last trading day immediately preceding
the grant date. 
 Partial Terms. For any director elected or appointed to the Board other than by the shareholders at an annual meeting of
shareholders, the amount of cash and equity compensation shall be prorated (assuming that the next annual meeting of shareholders will occur on the anniversary of the preceding Annual Meeting of Shareholders). Similarly all compensation changes
resulting from Committee and or Chair reassignments shall be equitably prorated.
#### § 2568.100 What is a CSU?

A CSU is an Alaska unit of the National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, National Trails System, National Wilderness Preservation System, or a National Forest Monument.
### Regulatory Evaluation

# ~·~ntllolS Docket No. FAA- 

### ')..0 \

# S

-**~~** l.'-l Directorate Identifier:

### ~ 

# ., • ..,,_ ? /(.I I t_.c 1 

# s- {(vou mak e cfumg e s to th e values in the table bd ow. y o u mu st t!n:mre the totals upda1 e a cc ordingly. {f They do n o t , clic k (o r Tah ; into an d ihen out ojThe c hange d ce ll. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft, engine, (e
. g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work

- hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost ( labor + 

## u.s. for U.S
. Fleet Do not include o n condition costs h e re access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close

- u_p) our) Prod ucts 

### Inspection 2.0 

### 31 Replacement

- 4.0 $5 00 

### 31 Bell crank Replacement

- 4.0 500 

### 31 Drive Funnel Adjust Airbrake Control System as 2.0 

### 31 needed

I

n

' I(,

I 

# '"

II 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U
. S. fleet: $62,620 

### Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $ On

- Condition Costs : Act ion Work-hours L abor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g ., Inspection, (inclu de access , (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) up) 

### ' 

## ,, 

# .

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): The two Parts Cost estimates include the shipping estimate to the United States. 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • YES* 

# D N0[8J *Explanation: 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? 

# G YES* 

# D NO [8J *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer.

# ~ YES 

## D N0[8J Explanation: This AD only affects 31 US registered gliders. 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska : This AD could affect intrasta te aviation in Alaska. 

### Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation?

## ~ YES* 

## D NO 

### [8J *Explanation:
Faulk , Scot t (OST ) r\ r From : Sent : To : Subject : Davi d Grind e <Dave.Grinde@nmsusa.com > Wednesday , Apri l 04 , 201 2 2:2 8 P M Faulk , Scott(OST

) V: : FW : CZ N essentia l servic e 

## ^-i'OPFRATION S

From : Davi d Grind e Sent : Wednesday , Apri l 04 , 201 2 10:2 8 A M To : 'scott.falk@dot.gov ' Subject : CZ N essentia l servic e Scot t I recentl ylearne d tha t4 0 mil e air' s contrac tfo rmai l servic e t o Chisan a i s soo n u p fo rreview

. Justwante d t o expres s m y suppor tfo rkeepin g tha tservic e intact

. I ow n propert yan d a recreationa l cabi n i n Chisan a an d rel yo n thi s servic e fo r acces s & mail

. Los

s o fthi s essentia l servic e woul d hav e a significan timpac to n m e an d m yfamily

. Appreciat e you rconsideration , Dave Grind e 

### (907 ) 688-808 8 akgrinde(5)aol.co m
§ 3102.20 Non-U.S. Citizens. ( a ) Leases or interests therein may be acquired and held by non-U.S. Citizens only through stock ownership, holding or control in a present or potential lessee that is incorporated under the laws of the United States or of any State or territory thereof, and only if the laws, customs or regulations of their country do not deny similar or like privileges to citizens or corporations of the United States. If it is determined that a country has denied similar or like privileges to citizens or corporations of the United States, it would be placed on a list available from any BLM State office.
( b ) The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States is authorized to review covered real estate transactions and to mitigate any risk to the national security of the United States that arises as a result of such transactions. Covered real estate transactions may include certain transactions involving the Federal mineral estate (see 31 CFR part 802).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,207.04

 1,207.21

 1,207.35

 1,207.46

 1,207.55

 1,207.68

 1,207.77

 1,207.86

 1,207.46

 1,207.54

 1,207.01

 1,207.16

 1,207.44

 1,207.51

 1,207.58

 1,207.64

 1,207.69

 1,207.76

 1,207.80

 1,207.87

 1,207.91

 1,208.27

 1,208.44

 1,208.47

 1,208.50

 1,208.53

 1,208.63

 1,208.68

 1,208.68

 1,208.68

 231.7

 232.2

 232.7

 233.0

 233.3

 233.7

 234.0

 234.3

 233.0

 233.3

 231.6

 232.1

 233.0

 233.2

 233.4

 233.6

 233.7

 234.0

 234.1

 234.3

 234.4

 235.6

 236.1

 236.2

 236.3

 236.4

 236.7

 236.9

 236.9

 236.9

STORAGE

+0.4

+0.5

+0.4

+0.3

+0.3

+0.4

+0.3

+0.3

-1.3

+0.3

-1.7

+0.5

+0.9

+0.2

+0.2

+0.2

+0.2

+0.2

+0.1

+0.2

+0.1

+1.1

+0.5

+0.1

+0.1

+0.1

+0.3

+0.2

+0.0

+0.0

CHANGE

462

492

450

403

371

454

377

370

474

345

481

460

658

327

330

320

307

343

273

340

294

796

485

268

273

277

387

295

227

230

INFLOW

 28

 14

 19

 15

 15

 27

 18

 14

 893

 18

 1,124

 18

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

PP

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 200

 199

 200

 199

 200

 200

 199

 199

 200

 199

 200

 200

 199

 200

 199

 200

 199

 200

 179

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 199

 198

 198

 198

OUTLETS

 13

 8

 9

 14

 13

 20

 17

 14

 17

 0

 0

 4

 0

 2

 6

 11

 14

 18

 16

 16

 17

 7

 0

 7

 12

 16

 14

 3

 15

 18

C.F.S.

 .14

 .09

 .10

 .15

 .14

 .22

 .18

 .15

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .02

 .06

 .12

 .15

 .19

 .17

 .17

 .18

 .08

 .00

 .07

 .13

 .17

 .15

 .03

 .16

 .19

INCHES

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WHISKEYTOWN LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 2, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAP.

C.F.S. * FRANCIS

COMPUTED

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +5.4 11,569 5,957 0 2,455 321 3.43

ACRE-FEET +5.4 22,947 11,816 0 4,869 637

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) WATER TO CLEAR CREEK BEING DISCHARGED THROUGH 972.00-1110.00 ELEVATION OUTLET.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 4,869

SPILL 0 16,685

 231.2

OUTLET 11,816

TOTAL

JUDGE

CARR PP

(1)

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 71

 10

 17

 80

 19

 98

 18

 325

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 16

 62

 34

 312

 218

 26

 33

 25

 10

 48

 10

 10

 1,542

 3,059

FROM

TO

SPRING CR.

TO CLEAR CR.

CLEAR

CR.

NATURAL

FLOW

 452

 482

 440

 393

 361

 383

 367

 353

 394

 326

 383

 442

 333

 317

 320

 310

 297

 333

 257

 278

 260

 484

 267

 242

 240

 252

 377

 247

 217

 220

 10,027

 19,889

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .07

 .45

 .04

 .12

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .33

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .00

 .00

 1.85

PRECIP

INCHES

PRECIPITATION

 1.85

 58.04

THIS MONTH

JULY 1, 2015 TO DATE
§ 3175.141 General requirements for flow-computer software testing. ( a ) *Test facility.* All testing must be performed by a qualified test facility not affiliated with the flow-computer manufacturer.
( b ) *Selection of flow-computer software to be tested.* ( 1 ) Each software version tested must be identical to the software version installed at FMPs for normal field operations.
( 2 ) Each software version must have a unique identifier.
( c ) *Testing method.* Input variables may be either: ( 1 ) Applied directly to the hardware registers; or
( 2 ) Applied physically to a transducer. If input variables are applied physically to a transducer, the values received by the hardware registers from the transducer must be recorded.
( d ) *Pass-fail criteria.* ( 1 ) For each test listed in §§ 3175.142 and 3175.143, the value(s) required to be calculated by the software version under test must be compared to the value(s) calculated by BLM-approved reference software, using the same digital input for both.
( 2 ) The software under test may be used at an FMP only if the difference between all values calculated by the software version under test and the reference software is less than 50 parts per million (0.005 percent) and the results of the tests required in §§ 3175.142 and 3175.143 are satisfactory to the PMT. If the test results are satisfactory, the BLM will identify the software version tested as acceptable for use on its website at *www.blm.gov*.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 247

 243

 219

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 299

 297

 299

 287

 283

 273

 275

 278

 270

 280

 270

 265

 271

 252

 260

 223

 208

 114

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 253

 252

 250

 243

 238

 233

 229

 233

 236

 235

 235

 230

 230

 236

 233

 233

 222

 158

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 267

 263

 261

 254

 249

 245

 242

 245

 247

 247

 245

 243

 241

 243

 246

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 3000.70 Multiple development.

The granting of a permit or lease for the prospecting, development or production of deposits of any one mineral does not preclude the issuance of other permits or leases for the same lands for deposits of other minerals with suitable stipulations for simultaneous operation, nor the allowance of applicable entries, locations or selections of leased lands with a reservation of the mineral deposits to the United States.