alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHYAM K. CHETAL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 19

- 15837

D.C. No. 3:18

- cv

- 03731

- EMC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5 , 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Shyam K. Chetal appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

in his Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action arising out of his requests for

records from the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Animal Legal Def. Fund v. U.S.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15837

Food & Drug Admin. , 836 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for the BLM because

Chetal failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the BLM did

not “conduct[ ] a search reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.”

Hamdan v. U.S. D ep’t of Justice , 797 F.3d 759, 770 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted); id . at 770

- 71 (requirements for demonstrating

adequacy of search for documents in response to a FOIA request) ; see also Hajro

v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigrat ion Servs ., 811 F.3d 1086, 1103 (9th Cir. 2016)

( after an agency produces all non

- exempt documents, a FOIA claim is generally

moot because the injury has been remedied ).

We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s post

- judgment order

denying Chetal’s motion for sanctions because Chetal failed to file a new or

amended notice of appeal from that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)( A) ; TAAG

Linhas Aereas de Angola v. Transamerica Airlines, Inc. , 915 F.2d 1351, 1354 (9th

Cir. 1990)

.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

.

Chetal’s motion for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 18) is denied.

Chetal’s request for sanc tions and judicial notice , set forth in the reply brief,3 19

- 15837

is denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### John D. McGrath, Respondent, v. Russell H. Bagley et al., Doing Business as Bagley Cleaners, et al., Appellants.

Action’ by a broker to recover the sum of $800 as commission earned by him as the procuring cause of the sale of a business owned by defendants Bagley to codefendant Paushter, as purr chaser, in accordance with an express agreement on the part of all defendants to pay plaintiff that amount. Judgment of the City Court of the City of. White Plains in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law, with one joint bill of costs on this appeal to defendants. As to defendant Paushter, the complaint is dismissed on the law, with costs to that defendant. As to defendants Bagley, a new trial is ordered. The provision in the contract of sale between defendants, to which plaintiff was not a party and in which his name was not incorporated as broker, whereby defendant Paushter promised defendants Bagley that he would pay any brokerage fee, was not expressly made for the benefit of plaintiff so as to enable him to bring an action based thereon directly against defendant Paushter. *(Seaver*v. *Bansom,*224 N. Y. 233.) Although the pleadings were conformed to the proof, the charge of the court, constituting the law of the case, made the existence of an express agreement on the part of defendants Bagley to pay at the rate of 10% a prerequisite to any recovery, and the jury was not permitted to render a verdict for the reasonable value of the services performed by plaintiff. No credible evidence of such an express agreement was produced at the trial. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Education

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Donna Nangle, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, SW., room 6030, Potomac Center Plaza, Washington, DC 20202. Telephone: (202) 245-7462 or via Internet:                         *donna.nangle@ed.gov.*

If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the TDD number at (202) 245-7317 or the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339. 

                        Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an alternative format (                        *e.g.*, Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer diskette) on request to the program contact person listed in this section.                     

## VIII. Other Information 

*Electronic Access to This Document:*                         You may view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , in text or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:                         *http://www.ed.gov/​news/​fedregister*

To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at this site. If you have questions about using PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC, area at (202) 512-1530. 

# Note:

                            The official version of this document is the document published in the                             **Federal Register**                            . Free Internet access to the official edition of the                             **Federal Register**                             and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at:                             *http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html*

Dated: September 24, 2004. 

Troy R. Justesen, 

Acting Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 04-21848 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
#### § 2562.0-3 Authority.

Section 10 of the Act of May 14, 1898 (30 Stat. 413, as amended August 23, 1958 (72 Stat. 730; 43 U.S.C. 687a), authorizes the sale at the rate of $2.50 per acre of not exceeding 80 acres of land in Alaska possessed and occupied in good faith as a trade and manufacturing site. The lands must be nonmineral in character, except that lands that may be valuable for coal, oil, or gas deposits are subject to disposition under the Act of March 8, 1922 (42 Stat. 415; 48 U.S.C. 376-377), as amended, and the regulations of § 2093.4 of this chapter.
206-/S

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA #14-13-00337-CR OFFENSE: Aggravated Assault

STYLE: Jamie Alberto Ibarra vThe State of Texas COUNTY: Harris

COA DISPOSITION: Affirmed TRIAL COURT: 174th District Court

DATE: January 22, 2015 Publish: Yes TC CASE #: 1287084

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

STYLE: Jamie Alberto Ibarra vThe State of Texas

CCA#

APP£LLAMT^S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

_204-/5"

DATE: 0"o/?/5, /7 20J6^ PC:

JUDGE: /*C PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

FOR REHEAR

JUDGE:

1INGINCCAIS:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
#### § 725.307 Cancellation of a request for withdrawal.

At any time prior to approval, a request for withdrawal may be canceled by a written request of the claimant or a person authorized to act on the claimant's behalf or on behalf of the claimant's estate.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 507.80

 508.42

 508.84

 508.81

 508.88

 508.92

 509.23

 508.45

 509.02

 508.80

 509.07

 508.94

 509.04

 508.96

 509.00

 508.59

 508.89

 509.16

 508.74

 508.57

 508.88

 508.44

 508.72

 508.08

 508.67

 508.80

 508.86

 509.19

 508.95

 508.89

 508.65

 64,247

 65,006

 65,523

 65,486

 65,572

 65,622

 66,007

 65,043

 65,745

 65,474

 65,807

 65,646

 65,770

 65,671

 65,720

 65,215

 65,585

 65,920

 65,400

 65,191

 65,572

 65,031

 65,375

 64,587

 65,314

 65,474

 65,548

 65,957

 65,658

 65,585

 65,289

STORAGE

-1,141

+759

+517

-37

+86

+50

+385

-964

+702

-271

+333

-161

+124

-99

+49

-505

+370

+335

-520

-209

+381

-541

+344

-788

+727

+160

+74

+409

-299

-73

-296

CHANGE

2,573

3,711

2,906

1,931

1,992

1,987

2,115

2,604

4,199

3,730

4,056

2,968

2,552

2,303

3,586

3,734

4,159

4,207

2,888

2,301

2,456

3,194

4,158

3,631

4,504

3,364

2,611

2,590

3,436

3,985

3,916

INFLOW

 2,475

 2,482

 2,406

 1,935

 1,935

 1,946

 1,904

 2,414

 2,482

 2,483

 2,481

 2,479

 2,416

 2,335

 2,485

 2,483

 2,483

 2,484

 2,488

 2,349

 2,249

 2,480

 2,485

 2,248

 2,484

 2,486

 2,471

 2,365

 2,484

 2,487

 2,485

POWER

 458

 541

 100

 0

 0

 0

 0

 479

 1,130

 1,243

 1,025

 249

 0

 0

 858

 1,384

 1,387

 1,227

 397

 0

 0

 599

 1,242

 1,587

 1,338

 464

 0

 0

 924

 1,399

 1,388

SPILL

 200

 289

 125

 0

 0

 0

 0

 185

 219

 130

 368

 304

 57

 0

 199

 107

 87

 310

 247

 43

 0

 374

 242

 178

 300

 317

 87

 0

 159

 116

 178

OUTLET

 15

 16

 14

 15

 14

 16

 17

 12

 14

 11

 14

 17

 16

 18

 19

 15

 15

 17

 18

 14

 15

 14

 16

 15

 15

 16

 16

 19

 20

 20

 14

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2019 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/01/2019

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -99 98,347 73,669 19,419 4,821 487

ACRE-FEET -99 195,071 146,122 38,518 9,562 966

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 146,122

SPILL 38,518 194,202

 65,388

OUTLET 9,562

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,614

 3,702

 2,912

 1,889

 1,988

 2,002

 2,119

 2,551

 4,231

 3,664

 3,987

 2,958

 2,553

 2,282

 3,580

 3,624

 4,129

 4,184

 2,880

 2,305

 2,455

 3,151

 4,098

 3,595

 4,508

 3,351

 2,612

 2,580

 3,390

 3,957

 3,886

 97,737

 193,861

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 6326

TIMOTHY DONALD DINGLE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Beaufort

. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. ( 9:19

- cv - 02426

- JD )

Submitted : October 14, 2021 Decided: October 18, 2021

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Timothy Donald Dingle , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Timothy Donald Dingle seeks to appeal th e district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Dingle that fai lure to file timely , specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve a ppellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v

. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 846

- 47 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 , 154

- 55 (1985). Although Dingle received proper notice and filed timely objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation, he has waived appellate review because the objections were not specific to the particularized legal

re commendations made by the magistrate judge. See Martin , 858 F.3d at 245 (holding that, “to preserve for appeal an issue in a magistrate judge’s report, a party must object to the finding or recommendation on that issue with sufficient specificity so as re asonably to alert the district court of the true ground for the objection” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.3 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 705

 781

 918

 964

 1,033

 1,077

 1,049

 1,118

 1,123

 1,101

 1,130

 1,082

 1,103

 1,098

 1,067

 1,007

 975

 964

 855

 808

 784

 774

 727

 738

 706

 620

 618

 594

 571

 592

 599

 619

 708

 782

 920

 967

 1,035

 1,009

 1,033

 992

 1,018

 1,048

 1,020

 1,069

 1,055

 1,001

 975

 938

 869

 802

 743

 722

 684

 674

 697

 614

 579

 549

 549

 539

 555

 537

 664

 743

 842

 938

 990

 1,055

 1,030

 1,068

 1,059

 1,069

 1,101

 1,052

 1,085

 1,077

 1,028

 994

 957

 932

 831

 773

 754

 732

 690

 716

 662

 598

 581

 571

 553

 578

 571

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 22,401

 22,680

 22,948

 23,250

 23,604

 24,068

 24,516

 25,128

 25,652

 26,068

 26,436

 26,706

 26,970

 27,201

 27,348

 27,435

 27,448

 27,406

 27,240

 26,988

 26,712

 26,476

 26,219

 25,989

 25,838

 25,700

 25,603

 25,649

 25,697

 25,723

 25,630

 747

 756

 765

 775

 787

 802

 817

 838

 855

 869

 881

 890

 899

 907

 912

 915

 915

 914

 908

 900

 890

 883

 874

 866

 861

 857

 853

 855

 857

 857

 854

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### § 3107.22 Cessation of production.

A lease in its extended term because of production (and lacking a well capable of production in paying quantities) will not expire upon cessation of production, if, within 60 calendar days of cessation of production, reworking or drilling operations on the leasehold are commenced and are thereafter conducted with reasonable diligence during the period of nonproduction. If these reworking or drilling operations fail to result in production in paying quantities, the lease will expire by operation of law, effective as of the date paying production ceased.
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-13418

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTHFUND XXII, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 495.09

 495.09

 494.95

 494.89

 494.76

 494.57

 494.33

 494.07

 493.79

 494.45

 495.77

 495.47

 496.08

 496.61

 496.30

 498.46

 498.14

 498.89

 500.21

 499.97

 499.49

 502.38

 503.86

 505.18

 504.72

 504.15

 503.54

 503.60

 503.14

 502.87

 502.74

 50,214

 50,214

 50,075

 50,015

 49,887

 49,699

 49,462

 49,205

 48,932

 49,581

 50,898

 50,596

 51,211

 51,751

 51,435

 53,668

 53,332

 54,120

 55,531

 55,271

 54,759

 57,916

 59,590

 61,119

 60,583

 59,924

 59,226

 59,294

 58,770

 58,464

 58,319

STORAGE

-141

+0

-139

-60

-128

-188

-237

-257

-273

+649

+1,317

-302

+615

+540

-316

+2,233

-336

+788

+1,411

-260

-512

+3,157

+1,674

+1,529

-536

-659

-698

+68

-524

-306

-145

CHANGE

179

250

177

214

184

155

130

120

111

582

918

103

564

527

97

1,382

86

652

960

117

136

2,047

1,140

1,089

311

248

227

604

302

237

181

INFLOW

 247

 247

 245

 242

 248

 248

 247

 247

 246

 251

 251

 252

 250

 252

 250

 252

 250

 251

 247

 247

 391

 451

 292

 315

 578

 576

 576

 563

 566

 386

 249

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 4

 3

 6

 4

 5

 4

 2

 1

 3

 4

 4

 3

 3

 4

 3

 7

 0

 5

 5

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/01/2005

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +7,964 14,030 9,913 0 0 101

ACRE-FEET +7,964 27,829 19,662 0 0 200

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 19,662

SPILL 0 19,662

 50,355

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 22

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 481

 837

 27

 485

 451

 32

 1,309

 32

 598

 854

 27

 27

 1,102

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 6,574

 13,040

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 2,315.56

 2,315.58

 2,315.68

 2,315.72

 2,315.74

 2,315.90

 2,316.29

 2,316.66

 2,316.90

 2,317.09

 2,317.28

 2,317.45

 2,317.62

 2,317.81

 2,317.99

 2,318.20

 2,318.39

 2,318.62

 2,319.05

 2,319.64

 2,320.20

 2,320.72

 2,321.38

 2,321.89

 2,322.33

 2,322.72

 2,323.10

 2,323.48

 1,653.8

 1,654.1

 1,655.4

 1,655.9

 1,656.2

 1,658.2

 1,663.2

 1,668.0

 1,671.1

 1,673.5

 1,676.0

 1,678.2

 1,680.4

 1,682.9

 1,685.2

 1,687.9

 1,690.4

 1,693.4

 1,699.0

 1,706.7

 1,714.0

 1,720.9

 1,729.6

 1,736.3

 1,742.1

 1,747.3

 1,752.4

 1,757.4

STORAGE

+1.5

+0.3

+1.3

+0.5

+0.3

+2.1

+5.0

+4.8

+3.1

+2.5

+2.5

+2.2

+2.2

+2.5

+2.3

+2.7

+2.5

+3.0

+5.6

+7.7

+7.3

+6.8

+8.7

+6.7

+5.8

+5.2

+5.0

+5.1

CHANGE

1,070

1,039

917

861

786

1,053

2,920

2,782

1,870

1,663

1,631

1,509

1,563

1,685

1,535

1,740

1,684

1,891

3,213

4,100

3,896

3,721

4,766

3,767

3,336

3,043

2,994

3,025

INFLOW

 235

 909

 245

 0

 0

 0

 380

 379

 311

 384

 376

 391

 423

 434

 337

 344

 422

 363

 390

 209

 188

 260

 353

 353

 374

 411

 419

 441

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 594

 638

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 60

 0

 26

 8

 19

 19

 11

 0

 0

 42

 15

 8

 30

 11

 23

 19

 15

 19

 0

 0

 8

 15

 27

 19

 23

 23

 31

 31

C.F.S.

 .16

 .00

 .07

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .04

 .02

 .08

 .03

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .08

 .08

INCHES

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .52

 .53

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .06

 .00

 .66

 1.98

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 13, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +105.2 64,060 9,331 0 1,232 502 1.32 3.88

ACRE-FEET +105,200 127,063 18,508 0 2,444 996

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 18,508

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,444

 20,952

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.88

JULY 1, 2001 28.64

 1,652.3

Table 4

(1) (1)