alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1863.5-1 Evidence of title.

Evidence of title, when required by the regulations, must be submitted in such form and by such abstracter or company as may be satisfactory to the Bureau of Land Management. A policy of title insurance, or a certificate of title, may be accepted in lieu of an abstract, in proper cases, when issued by a title company. A policy of title insurance when furnished must be free from conditions and stipulations not acceptable to the Department of the Interior. A certificate of title will be accepted only where the certificate is made to the Government, or expressly for its benefit and where the interests of the Government will be sufficiently protected thereby.

[[35 FR 9533](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/35-FR-9533), June 13, 1970]

Cross Reference:

For evidence of title in mining cases, see [§ 3862.1-3 of this chapter](/on/2024-09-06/title-43/section-3862.1-3).
### §8124. Prohibited acts relating to complementary access

It shall be unlawful for any person willfully to fail or refuse to permit, or to disrupt, delay, or otherwise impede, a complementary access authorized by this subchapter or an entry in connection with such access.

(Pub. L. 109–401, title II, §224, Dec. 18, 2006, 120 Stat. 2747.)
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-73,408-05

EX PARTE WILLIAM MICHAEL MASON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR POST-CONVICTION WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. 0620074-E IN THE 228 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

TH

HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

In March 1992, a jury found Applicant guilty of the offense of capital murder. See

TEX. PENAL CODE § 19.03(a). Based on the jury’s answers to the statutory punishment

questions set out in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 37.071, the trial court

sentenced Applicant to death. This Court affirmed Applicant’s conviction and sentence

1

on direct appeal. Mason v. State, 905 S.W.2d 570 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). On March

 Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this order to Articles refer to the Texas 1

Code of Criminal Procedure.
Mason - 2

20, 2013, this Court granted Applicant habeas relief in the form of a new punishment

trial. Ex parte Mason, No. AP-76,997 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 20, 2013) (not designated

for publication). The trial court held a new punishment trial in 2015. Based on the jury’s

answers to the statutory punishment questions set out in Article 37.0711, the trial court

again sentenced Applicant to death.

On February 10, 2017, the State filed in this Court its brief on Applicant’s direct

appeal of the punishment retrial. Pursuant to Article 11.071 §§ 4(a) and (b), Applicant’s

initial application for a writ of habeas corpus after retrial was due to be filed in the trial

court on or before June 26, 2017, assuming a motion for extension was timely filed and

granted. See Art. 11.071 §§ 4(a) and (b).

It has been three and a half years since the application was due in the trial court.

Further, it has come to this Court’s attention that, although a writ application was filed in

the trial court, it was filed on November 20, 2017–a date apparently outside of the time

allowed by Article 11.071. Accordingly, we order the trial court to determine within 15

days of the date of this order whether the writ application was timely filed. If the court

determines that the application was not timely filed, then the record should be forwarded

to this Court immediately for a determination under Article 11.071 § 4A. If it determines

that it was timely filed, then the court should resolve any remaining issues in the case

within 60 days from the date of this order. The clerk shall then immediately transmit the

complete writ record to this Court. Any extensions of time shall be requested by the trial
Mason - 3

judge, or on his or her behalf, and obtained from this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 13 DAY OF JANUARY, 2021.

TH

Do Not Publish
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.87

 509.41

 509.20

 509.05

 508.79

 508.58

 508.84

 508.92

 508.23

 508.49

 509.05

 508.83

 508.83

 508.82

 508.47

 508.55

 508.89

 509.16

 509.16

 508.75

 508.93

 508.80

 508.68

 508.32

 508.29

 508.74

 509.01

 508.81

 508.51

 508.59

 508.99

 65,560

 66,232

 65,970

 65,782

 65,461

 65,203

 65,523

 65,622

 64,772

 65,092

 65,782

 65,511

 65,511

 65,498

 65,068

 65,166

 65,585

 65,920

 65,920

 65,412

 65,634

 65,474

 65,326

 64,883

 64,846

 65,400

 65,732

 65,486

 65,117

 65,215

 65,708

STORAGE

-597

+672

-262

-188

-321

-258

+320

+99

-850

+320

+690

-271

+0

-13

-430

+98

+419

+335

+0

-508

+222

-160

-148

-443

-37

+554

+332

-246

-369

+98

+493

CHANGE

2,506

3,103

2,667

2,764

2,711

2,696

2,993

2,946

2,427

3,008

3,211

2,761

2,941

2,917

2,799

3,038

3,194

3,198

3,002

2,711

3,108

2,918

2,870

2,747

3,017

3,369

3,284

3,003

2,899

3,146

3,253

INFLOW

 2,485

 2,485

 2,486

 2,487

 2,484

 2,487

 2,485

 2,486

 2,486

 2,481

 2,484

 2,487

 2,483

 2,486

 2,487

 2,481

 2,484

 2,487

 2,487

 2,486

 2,485

 2,484

 2,481

 2,481

 2,478

 2,481

 2,485

 2,482

 2,482

 2,481

 2,480

POWER

 199

 199

 200

 201

 199

 200

 199

 200

 199

 199

 199

 201

 262

 122

 299

 298

 300

 368

 400

 400

 397

 398

 330

 366

 394

 396

 452

 497

 496

 495

 451

SPILL

 109

 64

 98

 153

 174

 123

 130

 190

 153

 149

 160

 192

 180

 300

 213

 197

 179

 153

 99

 65

 100

 103

 117

 107

 147

 200

 162

 130

 89

 95

 56

OUTLET

 14

 16

 15

 18

 16

 16

 18

 20

 18

 18

 20

 18

 16

 16

 17

 13

 20

 21

 16

 16

 14

 14

 17

 16

 17

 13

 18

 18

 18

 26

 17

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2017 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/01/2017

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -449 91,207 77,004 9,516 4,387 530

ACRE-FEET -449 180,909 152,737 18,875 8,702 1,051

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 152,737

SPILL 18,875 180,314

 66,157

OUTLET 8,702

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,507

 3,115

 2,661

 2,761

 2,705

 2,851

 3,002

 2,962

 2,438

 3,009

 3,085

 2,893

 2,795

 2,911

 2,800

 3,045

 3,182

 3,188

 3,037

 2,711

 3,110

 2,919

 2,863

 2,710

 2,983

 3,315

 3,273

 2,979

 2,892

 3,101

 3,222

 91,025

 180,548

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 HCW
BIOLOGICS INC. 
 2019 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and stockholders of HCW Biologics Inc. (the “Company”) have adopted the HCW Biologics 2019 Equity
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 
 WHEREAS, the Company has amended and restated its Certificate of Incorporation effective on or
about June 7, 2019 (the “Restated Certificate”) to provide for the authorization of two classes of Common Stock, “Class A Common Stock” and “Class B Common Stock”; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Restated Certificate, the holders of Class B Common Stock shall have two (2) votes per share on matters
submitted to a vote of stockholders, but otherwise the holders of Class B Common Stock have the same rights and powers of, and rank equally to, share ratably with, and are identical in all respects and as to all matters to Class A Common
Stock; 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to specify that Awards granted under the Plan will be made with respect to
Class A Common Stock; 
 WHEREAS, the Company also desires to amend the plan to increase the number of shares issuable under the Plan
to 3 million shares of Class A Common Stock; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 13 of the Plan permits the Company to amend the Plan
from time to time, subject to certain limitations specified therein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the following amendments and modifications are
hereby made a part of the Plan subject to, and effective as of the date of, the approval of stockholders of the Plan as amended: 
 1.
Amendment to Section 2 (Definitions). 
 The definition of “Common Stock” under Section 2 of the
Plan is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 
 “Common Stock” means, for purposes of the Plan and all Awards made
hereunder, Class A Common Stock of the Company. 
 2. Amendment to Section 4 (Shares Subject to the Plan).

 Section 4.1 is hereby amended in its entirety as follows: 

“4.1 Subject to adjustment in accordance with Section 11, a total of 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock shall be available for
the grant of Awards under the Plan; provided that, no more than 3,000,000 shares of Common Stock may be granted as Incentive Stock Options. During the terms of the Awards, the Company shall keep available at all times the number of shares of Common
Stock required to satisfy such Awards.” 












 3. Continuation of Plan. 

In all other respects, the Plan, as amended, is hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment to the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan as of June 7th, 2019. 

 

			
	HCW BIOLOGICS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Hing C. Wong

	Name:	 	Hing C. Wong
	Title:	 	CEO



  
 2
#### § 2564.0-3 Authority.

The Act of May 25, 1926, (44 Stat. 629; 43 U.S.C. 733-736) provides for the townsite survey and disposition of public lands set apart or reserved for the benefit of Indian or Eskimo occupants in trustee townsites in Alaska and for the survey and disposal of the lands occupied as native towns or villages. The Act of February 26, 1948 (62 Stat. 35; 43 U.S.C. 737), provides for the issuance of an unrestricted deed to any competent native for a tract of land claimed and occupied by him within any such trustee townsite.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Rigoberto AMAYA-MEMBRENO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40906.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Dis*298trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Rigoberto Amaya-Membreno (Amaya) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry by an alien after deportation. He argues that the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Amaya’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Amaya contends that *AlmendarezTorres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Amaya properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *AlmendarezTorres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 2933.14 For what time may BLM issue a Recreation Use Permit?

You may obtain a permit for a day, season of use, year, or any other time period that we deem appropriate for the particular use. We will post this information on site, or make it available at the local BLM office with jurisdiction over the area or site, or both.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549
                             ----------------------

                                    FORM 6-K

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                              Date: April 18, 2003

                             Koninklijke Ahold N.V.
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

                                   Royal Ahold
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                 The Netherlands
                         (Jurisdiction of organization)

       Albert Heijnweg 1, P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam, The Netherlands
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

         Registrant's telephone number, international: + 31-75-659-9111

                                     0-18898
                            (Commission File Number)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X           Form 40-F
                                ---                    ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes              No  X
                                 ---             ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________
<PAGE>

     On April 18, 2003, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. (the "Company") issued a press
release announcing that the Company distances itself from statements made on a
Dutch television program. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as
Exhibit 1.
<PAGE>

     SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                        KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.

Date:    April 18, 2003                 By: /s/ M.P.M de Raad
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   M.P.M. de Raad
                                           Title:  Executive Vice President
<PAGE>

                                LIST OF EXHIBITS

The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:

Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

1.             Ahold press release, dated April 18, 2003, announcing that the
               Company distances itself from statements made on a Dutch
               television program
### §4011. Responsibility of Secretary to account for daily and annual balances of Indian trust funds

#### (a) Requirement to account

The Secretary shall account for the daily and annual balance of all funds held in trust by the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or an individual Indian which are deposited or invested pursuant to section 162a of this title.

#### (b) Periodic statement of performance

Not later than 20 business days after the close of a calendar quarter, the Secretary shall provide a statement of performance to each Indian tribe and individual with respect to whom funds are deposited or invested pursuant to section 162a of this title. The statement, for the period concerned, shall identify—

(1) the source, type, and status of the funds;

(2) the beginning balance;

(3) the gains and losses;

(4) receipts and disbursements; and

(5) the ending balance.

#### (c) Annual audit

The Secretary shall cause to be conducted an annual audit on a fiscal year basis of all funds held in trust by the United States for the benefit of an Indian tribe or an individual Indian which are deposited or invested pursuant to section 162a of this title, and shall include a letter relating to the audit in the first statement of performance provided under subsection (b) after the completion of the audit.

(Pub. L. 103–412, title I, §102, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4240.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Performance and Account Statements for Inactive Accounts

Provisions stating that the Secretary was not required to provide a quarterly statement of performance for any Indian trust account that had not had activity for at least 18 months and had a balance of $1.00 or less but was required to issue an annual account statement and maintain a record of any such accounts and to permit the balance in each such account to be withdrawn upon the express written request of the account holder, were contained in Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2006, Pub. L. 109–54, title I, Aug. 2, 2005, 119 Stat. 519, and were repeated in provisions of subsequent appropriations acts which are not set out in the Code. Similar provisions were also contained in the following prior appropriations acts:

Pub. L. 108–447, div. E, title I, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 3061.

Pub. L. 108–108, title I, Nov. 10, 2003, 117 Stat. 1263.

Pub. L. 108–7, div. F, title I, Feb. 20, 2003, 117 Stat. 236.

Pub. L. 107–63, title I, Nov. 5, 2001, 115 Stat. 435.

Pub. L. 106–291, title I, Oct. 11, 2000, 114 Stat. 939.

Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(3) [title I], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–153.

Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title I], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–251.
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
     I, R. Michael Rouleau, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michaels Stores, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.   Date: June 9, 2005 /s/ R. Michael Rouleau    R. Michael Rouleau President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 2932.44 What bonds does BLM require for a Special Recreation Permit?

BLM may require you to submit a payment bond, a cash or surety deposit, or other financial guarantee in an amount sufficient to cover your fees or defray the costs of restoration and rehabilitation of the lands affected by the permitted use. We will return the bonds and financial guarantees when you have complied with all permit stipulations. BLM may waive the bonding requirement if we find that your activity will not cause appreciable environmental degradation or risk to human health and safety.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                          52,118
<SECURITIES>                                    44,572
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,518
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,714
<INVENTORY>                                     68,266
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,204
<PP&E>                                         214,534
<DEPRECIATION>                                 118,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 416,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,640
<OTHER-SE>                                     298,489
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   416,979
<SALES>                                        198,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               198,657
<CGS>                                          117,575
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,575
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,447)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,897
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,761
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
375 P.2d 336

#### Cecil Alvin PECE, Petitioner, v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 3 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 23, 1962.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, MOISE and NOBLE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason that counsel has been appointed by the District Court for petitioner.