alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

February 2013

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW dat Preliminary Data - Subject to change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss (4.33) Loss (4.33) Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-13 0000 0 0 46 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 114 1,504 

2-Feb-13 0830 3 8 49 59 0 35 2 0 2 35 91 149 1,508 

3-Feb-13 0 4 12 0 12 4 61 63 0 17 8 0 8 17 99 166 1,499 4-Feb-13 4030 7 0 68 63 17 0 2 0 19 0 118 166 1,504 

5-Feb-13 0024 2 4 70 67 0 0 1 3 1 3 120 169 1,504 

6-Feb-13 0400 0 4 70 71 0 17 0 0 0 17 120 186 1,499 

7-Feb-13 0 0 12 4 12 4 82 75 0 0 8 3 8 3 128 189 1,499 8-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 189 1,525 

9-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 189 1,512 

10-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 189 1,511 

11-Feb-13 0004 0 4 82 79 0 0 0 3 0 3 128 192 1,013 

12-Feb-13 0003 0 3 82 82 0 0 0 2 0 2 128 194 1,013 

13-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 194 1,338 

14-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 194 1,499 

15-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 194 1,499 

16-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 194 1,500 

17-Feb-13 0000 0 0 82 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 128 194 1,499 

18-Feb-13 0400 0 4 82 86 0 17 0 0 0 17 128 211 1,499 

19-Feb-13 4000 4 0 86 86 17 0 0 0 17 0 145 211 1,499 

20-Feb-13 8040 12 0 98 86 35 0 3 0 37 0 182 211 1,512 

21-Feb-13 4200 4 2 102 88 17 9 0 0 17 9 199 220 2,549 

22-Feb-13 4000 4 0 106 88 17 0 0 0 17 0 217 220 1,184 

23-Feb-13 0000 0 0 106 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 217 220 2,967 

24-Feb-13 6080 14 0 120 88 26 0 5 0 31 0 248 220 2,883 

25-Feb-13 2043 6 3 126 91 9 0 3 2 11 2 259 222 2,965 

26-Feb-13 2000 2 0 128 91 9 0 0 0 9 0 268 222 1,738 

27-Feb-13 0 0 16 0 16 0 144 91 0 0 11 0 11 0 279 222 2,889 

28-Feb-13 0 0 11 0 11 0 155 91 0 0 7 0 7 0 286 222 2,541 

Total 34 22 75 18 109 40 0 0 147 95 50 12 197 107 286 222 48,655 7

Preliminary

Banks Tr
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,349.72

 2,349.27

 2,348.80

 2,348.30

 2,347.80

 2,347.30

 2,346.80

 2,346.28

 2,345.74

 2,345.21

 2,344.70

 2,344.18

 2,343.65

 2,343.13

 2,342.61

 2,342.10

 2,341.53

 2,340.98

 2,340.52

 2,340.09

 2,339.67

 2,339.26

 2,338.74

 2,338.21

 2,337.70

 2,337.18

 2,336.67

 2,336.15

 2,335.62

 2,335.07

 2,334.53

 2,129.7

 2,122.9

 2,115.9

 2,108.4

 2,100.9

 2,093.5

 2,086.1

 2,078.3

 2,070.3

 2,062.5

 2,055.0

 2,047.3

 2,039.6

 2,031.9

 2,024.3

 2,016.9

 2,008.6

 2,000.6

 1,993.9

 1,987.7

 1,981.6

 1,975.7

 1,968.3

 1,960.7

 1,953.4

 1,945.9

 1,938.7

 1,931.3

 1,923.8

 1,916.0

 1,908.5

STORAGE

-6.8

-6.8

-7.0

-7.5

-7.5

-7.4

-7.4

-7.7

-8.0

-7.8

-7.5

-7.7

-7.8

-7.6

-7.6

-7.4

-8.3

-8.0

-6.7

-6.2

-6.1

-5.9

-7.5

-7.6

-7.3

-7.4

-7.3

-7.4

-7.5

-7.8

-7.6

CHANGE

436

418

264

106

33

74

59

54

12

108

222

110

62

79

164

303

103

33

23

172

359

371

261

88

196

147

199

204

100

2

46

INFLOW

 3,707

 3,679

 3,672

 3,728

 3,658

 3,689

 3,669

 3,804

 3,905

 3,909

 3,883

 3,870

 3,873

 3,794

 3,846

 3,907

 4,161

 3,916

 3,382

 3,193

 3,317

 3,228

 3,913

 3,802

 3,750

 3,775

 3,746

 3,812

 3,770

 3,851

 3,803

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 141

 146

 145

 149

 140

 140

 140

 140

 139

 148

 130

 99

 112

 129

 150

 150

 124

 149

 0

 119

 98

 123

 118

 118

 122

 113

 109

 113

 108

 66

 70

C.F.S.

 .32

 .33

 .33

 .34

 .32

 .32

 .32

 .32

 .32

 .34

 .30

 .23

 .26

 .30

 .35

 .35

 .29

 .35

 .00

 .28

 .23

 .29

 .28

 .28

 .29

 .27

 .26

 .27

 .26

 .16

 .17

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -228.1 4,808 116,012 0 0 3,748 8.73 .00

ACRE-FEET -228,100 9,537 230,110 0 0 7,434

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 230,110

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 230,110

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2000 .06

 2,136.5

(1) (1)
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT ADR IANA FIERR O M AR IN, AKA Adria na Fie nno M arin a

nd JOSE M AR INM EDINA, Pe titione rs, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 13-72781 Age n c y Nos. A098-410-333

A098-410-334 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . Adria na Fie rro M arin a

nd Jose M arin-M e dina , nat ive s a nd c itiz e ns of M e x ic o, pe tition for re vie wof the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing the i r a p pe a l from

an im m igrat ion judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing the ir re q ue st for a 

# FIL ED JUN 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).c ontinua

nc e and e nte ring a

n orde r of re m ova l. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for a buse of disc re tion thede nia l of a m otion for a c ontinua nc e . Sandov al-Luna v . Muk ase y , 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th C ir. 2008) (pe r c uriam ). W e grant the pe tition for re vie w a nd re m and. The B IA dism isse d pe titione rs’ a ppe a l of the de nia l of a

c ontinua nc e on the sole ground tha

t pe t itione rs we re not prim a fa c ie e ligiblefor a djustm e n t of sta tus be c a use no visa

wa s “ im m e diate ly av a ila b le .” To the c ontra

ry , pe titione rs we re

“ not re quire d to show prima fa c ie e ligibility

for a d justm e nt of sta

tus to de m onstra

te ‘ good c a

use ’ for a c ontinua nc e .” Ahme d v . Holde r , 569 F.3d 1009, 1015 (9th C ir. 2009). Give n the B IA’ s sole re lia n c e on this ground for affirm ing the d e nia l of the c o ntinua nc e , we re m and to a l low the a ge nc y to c onside r the fa c t ors outline d in our c a se la wand its prior de c isions re lating to c ontinua nc e m otions. Se e id. at 1012-15; se e also Matte r of Rajah , 25 I. & N. De c . 127, 135-36 (B IA 2009). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WG RANT E D; RE M ANDE D .

1 3 - 7 2 7 8 1 2
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**     I, David P. Suleski, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canyon Resources Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and,     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.             /s/ David P. Suleski   Date: August 13, 2007 David P. Suleski, Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 634

 600

 549

 568

 605

 617

 627

 644

 648

 645

 652

 664

 660

 646

 647

 582

 560

 587

 588

 627

 650

 664

 658

 651

 643

 637

 681

 705

 700

 700

 573

 547

 526

 544

 569

 606

 618

 603

 638

 639

 637

 646

 647

 608

 572

 548

 547

 552

 584

 588

 630

 649

 648

 642

 630

 623

 638

 678

 694

 684

 600

 579

 535

 551

 583

 611

 621

 632

 642

 642

 643

 656

 656

 635

 612

 559

 553

 565

 586

 610

 642

 656

 653

 647

 638

 628

 654

 697

 697

 690

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

May-08

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG. Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Pumpin

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-May-08 0200 0 2 2,797 895 0 1 0 0 0 1 1,846 591 924 537 1,461 2-May-08 0004 0 4 2,797 899 0 0 0 3 0 3 1,846 593 517 835 1,353 3-May-08 4000 4 0 2,801 899 3 0 0 0 3 0 1,849 593 645 837 1,482 4-May-08 0 12 0 0 0 12 2,801 911 0 8 0 0 0 8 1,849 601 596 838 1,434 5-May-08 0600 0 6 2,801 917 0 4 0 0 0 4 1,849 605 550 842 1,391 6-May-08 0200 0 2 2,801 919 0 1 0 0 0 1 1,849 607 550 844 1,394 7-May-08 0400 0 4 2,801 923 0 3 0 0 0 3 1,849 609 663 843 1,506 8-May-08 0000 0 0 2,801 923 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,849 609 507 842 1,349 9-May-08 0000 0 0 2,801 923 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,849 609 647 843 1,491 

10-May-08 0000 0 0 2,801 923 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,849 609 719 843 1,563 

11-May-08 0404 0 8 2,801 931 0 3 0 3 0 5 1,849 614 688 842 1,530 

12-May-08 0000 0 0 2,801 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,849 614 633 840 1,473 

13-May-08 4000 4 0 2,805 931 3 0 0 0 3 0 1,851 614 677 838 1,516 

14-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 614 839 1,453 

15-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 618 843 1,461 

16-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 497 835 1,332 

17-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 92 840 932 

18-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 1,050 843 1,894 

19-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 801 847 1,648 

20-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 548 846 1,395 21-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 712 847 1,559 

22-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 614 377 847 1,224 

23-May-08 0200 0 2 2,805 933 0 1 0 0 0 1 1,851 616 975 976 1,950 24-May-08 0800 0 8 2,805 941 0 5 0 0 0 5 1,851 621 1,334 1,052 2,385 

25-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 941 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 621 1,570 1,045 2,616 

26-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 941 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 621 1,478 1,048 2,526 

27-May-08 0004 0 4 2,805 945 0 0 0 3 0 3 1,851 624 541 1,044 1,585 

28-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 945 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 624 1,182 1,045 2,227 29-May-08 0000 0 0 2,805 945 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,851 624 1,187 1,040 2,227 

30-May-08 4000 4 0 2,809 945 3 0 0 0 3 0 1,854 624 1,370 1,047 2,417 

31-May-08 0000 0 0 2,809 945 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,854 624 586 1,043 1,629 

Total 12 40 0 12 12 52 2,809 945 8 26 08 8 34 1,854 624 23,845 27,556 51,401 

Season Total 1,258 661 1,579 310

Banks Tracy Combined B
**EXHIBIT 10.7**

 

**2005 EXECUTIVE BONUSES**

 
| **Employee**   | ** ** | **Corporate Title**               | ** ** | **2005  Bonuses** |
|----------------|------------|----------------------------------------|------------|-------------------|
|           |       |                                   |       |              |
| Jack Wauchope  |       | President  and Chief Executive Officer |       | $                 | 25,000 |
| Davina Palazzo |       | EVP/Small  Business Lender             |       | $                 | 15,000 |
| Leah Pauly     |       | EVP/  Chief Credit Officer             |       | $                 | 20,000 |
| Karan Pohl     |       | SVP/Chief  Financial Officer           |       | $                 | 3,000 |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 506.05

 505.99

 505.67

 505.30

 505.09

 504.52

 503.88

 504.09

 504.05

 504.12

 504.10

 504.13

 504.40

 504.97

 504.76

 504.52

 504.33

 504.15

 504.00

 504.56

 503.67

 502.51

 502.14

 500.96

 501.73

 502.78

 502.56

 501.94

 501.27

 500.70

 500.11

 62,143

 62,071

 61,695

 61,260

 61,013

 60,352

 59,613

 59,854

 59,808

 59,889

 59,866

 59,900

 60,213

 60,872

 60,629

 60,352

 60,132

 59,924

 59,750

 60,398

 59,374

 58,061

 57,647

 56,344

 57,192

 58,364

 58,117

 57,424

 56,685

 56,062

 55,422

STORAGE

-59

-72

-376

-435

-247

-661

-739

+241

-46

+81

-23

+34

+313

+659

-243

-277

-220

-208

-174

+648

-1,024

-1,313

-414

-1,303

+848

+1,172

-247

-693

-739

-623

-640

CHANGE

876

873

695

630

694

498

523

1,037

880

934

849

822

881

673

173

158

180

184

190

663

44

32

484

31

1,122

1,289

563

198

-11

-7

-7

INFLOW

 898

 899

 875

 841

 809

 824

 886

 904

 892

 884

 855

 800

 717

 332

 288

 290

 285

 283

 277

 331

 553

 688

 688

 684

 691

 694

 685

 542

 355

 302

 302

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 8

 10

 10

 8

 10

 7

 10

 11

 11

 9

 6

 5

 6

 9

 8

 8

 6

 6

 1

 5

 7

 6

 5

 4

 3

 4

 3

 5

 7

 5

 14

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/14/2002

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -6,780 16,151 19,354 0 0 217

ACRE-FEET -6,780 32,036 38,389 0 0 430

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 38,389

SPILL 0 38,389

 62,202

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 877

 850

 672

 618

 673

 474

 508

 1,018

 850

 902

 830

 799

 848

 630

 14

 113

 24

 85

 98

 644

 20

 14

 469

 14

 1,102

 1,262

 737

 14

 14

 14

 51

 15,238

 30,225

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
#### § 10010.39 Elimination of duplication with state and local procedures.

The Commission will incorporate in its appropriate program regulations provisions for the preparation of an EIS by a State agency to the extent authorized in section 102(2)(D) of NEPA.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. RAYMUNDO PALERMO

- HERNANDEZ, AKA Adan Baez

- Cruz,

Defendant

- Appellant. Nos. 20

- 10035 20

- 10036
D.C. Nos. 4:16

- cr - 02372

- CKJ

- EJM

- 1 4:19

- cr - 01192

- CKJ

- EJM

- 1

MEMORANDUM *
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted January 20, 2021 * *
Before: McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judg es
. In these consolidated appeals, Raymundo Palermo

- Hernandez appeals from
the 41

- month sentence imposed for re entry of a removed alien , in violation of 8
U.S.C. § 1326 , and th e 21

- month sentence imposed u pon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argum ent. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 27 2021 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 10035 & 20

- 10036

Palermo

- Hernandez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to consider his arguments and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors ,

an d by failing to explain adequately the sentence. We review for plain error , see United States v. Valencia

- Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103 , 1108 (9th Cir. 20 10 ) , and
conclude that there is none. The record reflects that the district court considered
Palermo

- Hernandez’s arguments for a shorter and fully concurrent sentence , considered the relevant § 3553(a) sentencing factors, and adequately explained its
determination that the aggregate , partially consecutive sentence was warranted.
See Un ited States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc) ; see also
United States v. Perez

- Perez , 512 F.3d 514, 516 (9th Cir. 2008) ( a s entencing judge need not expressly address every sentencing argument).
Palermo

- Hernandez next contends that the revocation sentence is substantively unreasonable because it does not run fully concurrent to the sentence for his new criminal conviction . The aggregate sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) fact ors and the totality of the
circumstances , including , as the district court noted, Palermo

- Hernandez’s significant immigration and criminal history

. See United States v. Gall , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) ; see also U.S.S.G. § 7 B 1.3(f)

. AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 12
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                 KERR-McGEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



(Millions of dollars)                                     2002         2001         2000         1999          1998
---------------------                                    -----         ----        ------        ----         -----
<S>                                                      <C>           <C>         <C>           <C>          <C>
Income (loss) from
     continuing operations                               $(611)        $476        $  817        $138         $(339)

Add -
     Provision (benefit) for
         income taxes                                      (46)         276           437         105          (173)
     Interest expense                                      275          195           208         191           159
     Rental expense representative
         of interest factor                                 20           13            11          12            12
                                                         -----         ----        ------        ----         -----
     Earnings (loss)                                     $(362)        $960        $1,473        $446         $(341)
                                                         =====         ====        ======        ====         =====

Fixed Charges -
     Interest expense                                    $ 275         $195        $  208        $191         $ 159
     Rental expense representative
         of interest factor                                 20           13            11          12            12
      Interest capitalized                                   8           31             5           8            28
                                                         -----         ----        ------        ----         -----
         Total fixed charges                             $ 303         $239        $  224        $211         $ 199
                                                         =====         ====        ======        ====         =====

Ratio of earnings (loss) to
     fixed charges                                           -(1)       4.0           6.6         2.1             -(1)
                                                         =====         ====        ======        ====         =====

</TABLE>


(1)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $665 million in 2002 and
     $540 million in 1998.