alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4222. Block grants for affordable housing activities

#### (a) Grant authority

For each fiscal year, the Secretary shall (to the extent amounts are made available to carry out this subchapter) make a grant under this subchapter to the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands to carry out affordable housing activities for Native Hawaiian families who are eligible to reside on the Hawaiian Home Lands.

#### (b) Plan requirement

#### (1) In general

The Secretary may make a grant under this subchapter to the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands for a fiscal year only if—

(A) the Director has submitted to the Secretary a housing plan for that fiscal year; and

(B) the Secretary has determined under section 4224 of this title that the housing plan complies with the requirements of section 4223 of this title.

#### (2) Waiver

The Secretary may waive the applicability of the requirements under paragraph (1), in part, if the Secretary finds that the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands has not complied or cannot comply with those requirements due to circumstances beyond the control of the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands.

#### (c) Use of funds for affordable housing activities under plan

Except as provided in subsection (e), amounts provided under a grant under this section may be used only for affordable housing activities under this subchapter that are consistent with a housing plan approved under section 4224 of this title.

#### (d) Administrative expenses

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall, by regulation, authorize the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands to use a percentage of any grant amounts received under this subchapter for any reasonable administrative and planning expenses of the Department relating to carrying out this subchapter and activities assisted with those amounts.

#### (2) Administrative and planning expenses

The administrative and planning expenses referred to in paragraph (1) include—

(A) costs for salaries of individuals engaged in administering and managing affordable housing activities assisted with grant amounts provided under this subchapter; and

(B) expenses incurred in preparing a housing plan under section 4223 of this title.

#### (e) Public-private partnerships

The Director shall make all reasonable efforts, consistent with the purposes of this subchapter, to maximize participation by the private sector, including nonprofit organizations and for-profit entities, in implementing a housing plan that has been approved by the Secretary under section 4223 of this title.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VIII, §802, as added Pub. L. 106–568, title II, §203, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2877, and Pub. L. 106–569, title V, §513, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2971.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 106–568, §203, and Pub. L. 106–569, §513, enacted identical sections 802 of Pub. L. 104–330. This section is based on the text of section 802 of Pub. L. 104–330, as added by Pub. L. 106–569, §513.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security U.S. Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: Reinstatement of Licenses.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, (19 U.S.C. 1641) and Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations at section 111.30(d), the following Customs broker licenses were inadvertently revoked without prejudice on November 18, 2011. 
                        *See*
                         Notice of Revocation of Customs Broker License, dated November 18, 2011 (76 FR 71584). The below identified licenses are active. Name
License
Port nameAldo Neyra, Jr
17367
Los Angeles.Samantha Woo
17389
New York.Gloria S. Oh
04973
New York.Kenneth Carlstedt
13049
New York.Michael Bonvissuto
04793
New York.John G. Duffield
05829
New York.Michael Russell
22702
New York.Anthony J. Raffin
24103
Detroit.Jeramy Caudill
23068
St. Louis.Susan K. Richards
10847
Philadelphia.Catherine Finn
12339
New Orleans.
 Dated: April 23, 2012. Richard DiNucci, Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. 2012-10445 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 839.46

 839.65

 839.85

 839.98

 840.15

 840.28

 840.40

 840.50

 840.60

 840.70

 840.82

 840.89

 840.57

 840.06

 839.65

 839.23

 838.82

 838.41

 838.16

 838.17

 838.23

 838.27

 838.33

 838.36

 838.41

 838.46

 838.50

 838.53

 838.56

 838.57

 838.59

 48.41

 48.65

 48.90

 49.07

 49.29

 49.45

 49.61

 49.74

 49.87

 49.99

 50.15

 50.24

 49.83

 49.17

 48.65

 48.11

 47.60

 47.08

 46.77

 46.78

 46.86

 46.91

 46.98

 47.02

 47.08

 47.14

 47.19

 47.23

 47.27

 47.28

 47.31

STORAGE

+0.24

+0.24

+0.26

+0.17

+0.22

+0.17

+0.15

+0.13

+0.13

+0.13

+0.16

+0.09

-0.41

-0.66

-0.52

-0.53

-0.52

-0.51

-0.31

+0.01

+0.08

+0.05

+0.08

+0.04

+0.06

+0.06

+0.05

+0.04

+0.04

+0.01

+0.03

CHANGE

179

173

180

136

162

137

131

117

118

117

130

95

127

-1

70

66

72

74

57

91

93

81

94

77

89

83

77

72

72

59

65

INFLOW

 20

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

SPILL

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 311

 311

 311

 311

 311

 311

 194

 62

 31

 31

 31

 31

 31

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

OUTLET

 12

 16

 16

 17

 17

 18

 18

 17

 18

 17

 16

 15

 14

 9

 13

 14

 12

 12

 10

 13

 14

 15

 15

 17

 16

 15

 15

 16

 16

 16

 15

C.F.S.

 .29

 .39

 .39

 .43

 .43

 .44

 .43

 .41

 .44

 .41

 .40

 .36

 .35

 .21

 .32

 .35

 .29

 .29

 .25

 .32

 .36

 .39

 .39

 .43

 .41

 .37

 .38

 .40

 .41

 .40

 .38

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 RUN DATE: 02/14/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.82 3,093 2,739 320 464 11.52 .00

ACRE-FEET -820 6,135 5,433 635 920

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 635

OUTLET

TOTAL

 5,433

 6,068

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2011 .00

 48.16

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual Report of J. Allen Greer,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: May 11, 2006                                    Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
§ 2450.3 Proposed classification decision. ( a ) The State Director shall make and issue a proposed classification decision which shall contain a statement of reasons in support thereof. Such decisions shall be served upon ( 1 ) each petitioner-applicant for the land,
( 2 ) any grazing permittee, licensee, or lessee on the land, or his representative,
( 3 ) the District Advisory Board,
( 4 ) the local governing board, planning commission, State coordinating committee, or other official or quasi-official body having jurisdiction over zoning in the geographic area within which the lands are located, and
( 5 ) any governmental officials or agencies from whom the record discloses comments on the classification have been received. If the decision affects more than 2,560 acres and would lead to the disposal of the lands, the decision will also be published in accordance with the provisions of subpart 2462.
( b ) When there are multiple petition-applications for the same land, the proposed classification decision shall state which petition-application, if any, will be entitled to preference under applicable law; or where no petition-application has been filed for the purpose for which the land is proposed to be classified, the decision shall so state. ( 1 ) When multiple petition-applications have been filed for the same land, the one first filed for the purpose for which the land is classified will be entitled to preference under applicable law.
( 2 ) When two or more petition-applications have been simultaneously filed for the purpose for which the land is classified, the petition-application entitled to preference will be the first to be selected by drawing.
( 3 ) If no petition-application has been filed for the purpose for which it is proposed to classify the land, the proposed decision shall state that the land will be opened to application by all qualified individuals on an equal-opportunity basis after public notice.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.51

 130.75

 130.69

 130.65

 130.74

 130.79

 130.83

 130.78

 130.48

 130.61

 130.60

 130.62

 130.77

 130.86

 130.76

 130.64

 130.72

 130.72

 130.61

 130.47

 130.61

 130.65

 130.45

 130.50

 130.63

 130.69

 130.62

 130.73

 130.60

 130.61

 634

 662

 655

 650

 660

 666

 670

 665

 631

 645

 644

 646

 664

 674

 663

 649

 658

 658

 645

 630

 645

 650

 628

 633

 648

 655

 646

 659

 644

 645

STORAGE

-10

+28

-7

-5

+10

+6

+4

-5

-34

+14

-1

+2

+18

+10

-11

-14

+9

+0

-13

-15

+15

+5

-22

+5

+15

+7

-9

+13

-15

+1

CHANGE

434

434

419

425

410

413

432

445

458

473

449

429

430

441

417

399

410

383

337

339

356

346

301

325

357

331

317

322

296

292

INFLOW

 32

 31

 32

 33

 33

 33

 33

 34

 35

 34

 33

 32

 31

 31

 31

 30

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 30

 31

 32

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

PUTAH

 406

 388

 390

 394

 371

 376

 396

 413

 439

 431

 416

 395

 389

 404

 391

 375

 375

 353

 314

 317

 318

 313

 281

 290

 316

 293

 288

 281

 270

 257

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .25

 .31

 .28

 .30

 .29

 .39

 .32

 .30

 .21

 .17

 .20

 .24

 .26

 .23

 .18

 .26

 .27

 .22

 .26

 .15

 .25

 .22

 .15

 .19

 .28

 .19

 .26

 .22

 .30

 .22

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2010 RUN DATE: 10/18/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1 11,620 10,640 950 30 7.37 .00

ACRE-FEET +1 23,048 21,104 1,884 60

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,884

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 21,104

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2010 .00

 644

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
§ 2809.17 Will the BLM ever reject bids or re-conduct a competitive offer? ( a ) The BLM may reject bids regardless of the amount offered. If the BLM rejects your bid under this provision, you will be notified in writing and such notice will include the reason(s) for the rejection and what refunds to which you are entitled. If the BLM rejects a bid, the bidder may appeal that decision under § 2801.10.
( b ) We may make the next highest bidder the successful bidder if the first successful bidder does not satisfy the requirements of § 2809.15, does not execute the lease, or is for any reason disqualified from holding the lease.
( c ) If we are unable to determine the successful bidder, such as in the case of a tie, we may re-offer the lands competitively (under § 2809.13) to the tied bidders or to all prospective bidders.
[81 FR 92224, Dec. 19, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 35684, May 1, 2024]
### §379. Sale of allotted lands by heirs

The adult heirs of any deceased Indian to whom a trust or other patent containing restrictions upon alienation has been or shall be issued for lands allotted to him may sell and convey the lands inherited from such decedent, but in case of minor heirs their interests shall be sold only by a guardian duly appointed by the proper court upon the order of such court, made upon petition filed by the guardian, but all such conveyances shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary of the Interior, and when so approved shall convey a full title to the purchaser, the same as if a final patent without restriction upon the alienation had been issued to the allottee. All allotted land so alienated by the heirs of an Indian allottee and all land so patented to a white allottee shall thereupon be subject to taxation under the laws of the State or Territory where the same is situate: Provided, That the sale herein provided for shall not apply to the homestead during the life of the father, mother or the minority of any child or children.

(May 27, 1902, ch. 888, §7, 32 Stat. 275.)
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-137565 and Form S-8 No. 333-167494) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our reports dated March 5, 2014 , with respect to the consolidated financial statements and Schedule 12-14 of MCG Capital Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MCG Capital Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2013 .


/s/  Ernst & Young LLP


McLean, Virginia


March 5, 2014
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 506.03

 504.69

 505.39

 505.89

 505.38

 505.80

 505.81

 506.01

 505.98

 506.33

 506.27

 506.87

 507.22

 507.10

 507.58

 507.82

 507.63

 507.69

 507.89

 508.13

 508.73

 508.63

 508.62

 508.40

 508.69

 508.97

 508.29

 507.91

 508.21

 508.26

 508.54

 62,119

 60,548

 61,366

 61,954

 61,354

 61,848

 61,860

 62,095

 62,059

 62,477

 62,405

 63,122

 63,544

 63,398

 63,980

 64,271

 64,041

 64,113

 64,356

 64,649

 65,388

 65,265

 65,252

 64,981

 65,338

 65,683

 64,846

 64,380

 64,748

 64,809

 65,154

STORAGE

+71

-1,571

+818

+588

-600

+494

+12

+235

-36

+418

-72

+717

+422

-146

+582

+291

-230

+72

+243

+293

+739

-123

-13

-271

+357

+345

-837

-466

+368

+61

+345

CHANGE

1,863

1,090

2,278

2,183

1,587

2,137

1,908

2,106

2,450

2,684

2,394

2,718

2,647

2,432

2,812

2,709

2,475

2,645

2,723

2,715

2,665

2,187

2,308

2,194

2,536

2,524

1,979

2,083

2,418

2,088

2,152

INFLOW

 1,754

 1,746

 1,748

 1,754

 1,747

 1,751

 1,754

 1,751

 1,750

 1,700

 1,752

 1,755

 1,759

 1,761

 1,764

 1,763

 1,764

 1,764

 1,764

 1,763

 1,773

 1,771

 1,771

 1,773

 1,775

 1,774

 1,776

 1,770

 1,771

 1,773

 1,772

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 87

 389

 510

 471

 435

 386

 485

 581

 584

 584

 586

 586

 477

 399

 345

 299

 299

 300

 300

 302

 352

 325

 161

 99

SPILL

 66

 129

 110

 123

 133

 125

 138

 139

 318

 252

 195

 156

 280

 245

 161

 204

 229

 247

 237

 321

 118

 123

 236

 248

 265

 267

 311

 183

 123

 110

 93

OUTLET

 7

 7

 8

 10

 9

 12

 10

 11

 11

 11

 12

 11

 9

 15

 13

 11

 14

 12

 13

 6

 2

 10

 9

 11

 16

 9

 12

 13

 13

 13

 14

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/18/2002

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3,106 71,690 54,563 9,342 5,885 334

ACRE-FEET +3,106 142,197 108,226 18,530 11,673 662

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 108,226

SPILL 18,530 138,429

 62,048

OUTLET 11,673

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,875

 1,069

 2,319

 2,187

 1,679

 2,134

 1,948

 2,120

 2,353

 2,551

 2,400

 2,549

 2,488

 2,302

 2,653

 2,612

 2,363

 2,476

 2,582

 2,527

 2,489

 2,098

 2,091

 1,989

 2,536

 2,122

 2,027

 2,026

 2,352

 2,137

 2,241

 69,295

 137,447

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1600

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-12, the Bureau of Land Management removed all amendments to part 1600 made effective on Jan. 11, 2017, at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016.

#### § 1610.5-6 Revision.

A resource management plan shall be revised as necessary, based on monitoring and evaluation findings (§ 1610.4-9), new data, new or revised policy and changes in circumstances affecting the entire plan or major portions of the plan. Revisions shall comply with all of the requirements of these regulations for preparing and approving an original resource management plan.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
§ 2561.2 Proof of use and occupancy. ( a ) An allotment will not be made until the lands are surveyed by the Bureau of Land Management, and until the applicant or the authorized officer of the Bureau of Indian Affairs has made satisfactory proof of substantially continuous use and occupancy of the land for a period of five years by the applicant. Such proof shall be made on a form approved by the Director, Bureau of Land Management, and filed in the proper land office. If made by the applicant, it must be signed by him, but if he is unable to write his name, his mark or thumb print shall be impressed on the statement and witnessed by two persons. This proof may be submitted with the application for allotment if the applicant has then used and occupied the land for five years, or may be made at any time within six years after the filing of the application when the requirements have been met.
( b ) [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 521

 479

 463

 468

 492

 521

 524

 506

 513

 520

 603

 602

 563

 569

 429

 480

 517

 515

 496

 490

 511

 541

 581

 681

 727

 745

 747

 781

 787

 775

 478

 457

 452

 456

 468

 487

 477

 438

 497

 474

 482

 529

 514

 440

 407

 412

 449

 487

 481

 482

 487

 509

 538

 572

 675

 713

 735

 734

 771

 723

 488

 470

 456

 462

 482

 504

 495

 484

 503

 491

 573

 547

 527

 504

 417

 455

 500

 498

 489

 486

 501

 530

 569

 653

 711

 736

 738

 769

 780

 746

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2602

NELDA A. PERKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY GOVERNMENT; PRINCE

GEORGE'S COUNTY COUNCIL; ANIMAL CONTROL

COMMISSION; RONALD SIMONS; JAN MARKS; SHELLIE

MOORE; NANCY R. REAMS, Dr.; MICHAEL ALTERI,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA93-1305-DKC)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nelda A. Perkins, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Daniel Wallace, COUNTY

ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Perkins v. Prince George's County Gov't, No. CA-93-1305-DKC

(D. Md. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

Board of Directors

LiquidmetalTechnologies, Inc.

 

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference of our report of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm dated February 23, 2006 on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2005, and therelated consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss,shareholders’ equity (deficiency), and cash flows for the year ended December31, 2005 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company’s previously filedRegistration Statement (File No. 333-101447).

 

  
| /s/  Choi, Kim & Park, LLP. |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
| CERTIFIED  PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS   |
|                            |
| Los  Angeles, California        |
| March  15, 2006                 |

 

 

----
### Part A—General Programs