alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### **Exhibit 32.1**

#### ** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.**

**SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. (the “company”) on Form 10-K/A(Amendment #3) for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we,Ricardo A. Salas, President / Chief Executive Officer, and Young J. Ham, ChiefFinancial Officer, of the company, certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the company.

 

 
| Date: July 20,  2006 | By:    | /s/ Ricardo A. Salas |   |
|---------------------------|--------|----------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Ricardo A. Salas     |
|                      |   | President and CEO    |
|                      |   |                 |
|                      |   |                 |
| Date: July 20,  2006 | By:    | /s/ Young J. Ham     |   |
|                      |   | Young J. Ham         |
|                      |   | CFO                  |

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toLiquidmetal Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by LiquidmetalTechnologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 27950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11338]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, May 15, 2013, 4:00 p.m.-4:30 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave. SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT: Notice of meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The meeting will be a continuation 
of the April 11, 2013 meeting, which was adjourned due to lack of a 
quorum. The BBG will receive and consider a report from the Governance 
Committee regarding the compliance progress with the recommendations in 
the Office of Inspector General's inspection report of the BBG, as well 
as a BBG Board staffing plan. The BBG will receive and consider a 
progress report from the Strategy and Budget Committee, including the 
2013 language service review process and the BBG strategic plan update.
    A complete audio recording and a verbatim transcript of the meeting 
will promptly be made available for public observation on the BBG's Web 
site at www.bbg.gov. Information regarding this meeting, including any 
updates or adjustments to its starting time, can also be found on the 
Agency's Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-11338 Filed 5-9-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8160-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 22 (Tuesday, February 3, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 5012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-2185]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2003-16081; Airspace Docket No. 03-ACE-73]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Kingman, KS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Kingman, KS.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 0901 UTC, April 15, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic Division, 
Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal 
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: 
(816) 329-2525.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on December 9, 2003 
(68 FR 68506). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a 
non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no 
adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that 
no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on April 15, 2004. No adverse comments were received, 
and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become 
effective on that date.

    Issued in Kansas City, MO, on January 15, 2004.
Elizabeth S. Wallis,
Acting Manager, Air Traffic Division, Central Region.
[FR Doc. 04-2185 Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
§ 2520.0-7 Cross references. ( a ) For assignment of desert-land entries within Government reclamation projects, see § 2524.5(a).
( b ) For provisions under Appeals and Hearings see parts 1840 and 1850 of this chapter.
( c ) For relinquishments, in general, see subpart 1825 of this chapter.
( d ) For residence and cultivation requirements under the homestead laws, see § 2511.4-2(a).
§ 2310.3-5 Compensation for improvements. ( a ) When an application is allowed, the applicant shall compensate the holder of record of each permit, license or lease lawfully terminated or revoked after the allowance of an application, for all authorized improvements placed on the lands under the terms and conditions of the permit, license or lease, before the lands were segregated or withdrawn. The amount of such compensation shall be determined by an appraisal as of the date of revocation or termination of the permit, license or lease, but shall not exceed fair market value. To the extent such improvements were constructed with Federal funds, they shall not be compensable unless the United States has been reimbursed for such funds prior to the allowance of the application and then only to the extent of the sum that the United States has received.
( b ) When an application is allowed that affects public lands which are subject to permits or leases for the grazing of domestic livestock and that is required to be terminated, the applicant shall comply with the cancellation notice and compensation requirements of section 402(g) of the Act (43 U.S.C. 1752(g)), to the extent applicable.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40312.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Antonio Alvarado appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Alvarado’s constitutional challenge to § 1326 is foreclosed. Although Alvarado *659contends that *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Alvarado properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,282.40

 2,281.93

 2,281.50

 2,281.09

 2,280.66

 2,280.21

 2,279.81

 2,279.38

 2,278.91

 2,278.54

 2,278.25

 2,277.84

 2,277.48

 2,277.11

 2,276.56

 2,275.95

 2,275.54

 2,275.04

 2,274.66

 2,274.31

 2,273.96

 2,273.68

 2,273.43

 2,273.16

 2,272.92

 2,272.65

 2,272.43

 2,272.11

 2,271.83

 2,271.58

 2,271.23

 1,264.7

 1,259.7

 1,255.2

 1,250.8

 1,246.3

 1,241.6

 1,237.5

 1,233.0

 1,228.2

 1,224.3

 1,221.4

 1,217.1

 1,213.4

 1,209.7

 1,204.1

 1,197.8

 1,193.7

 1,188.6

 1,184.8

 1,181.3

 1,177.8

 1,175.0

 1,172.5

 1,169.8

 1,167.4

 1,164.7

 1,162.5

 1,159.4

 1,156.6

 1,154.1

 1,150.7

STORAGE

-5.6

-5.0

-4.5

-4.3

-4.5

-4.7

-4.2

-4.5

-4.9

-3.8

-3.0

-4.2

-3.7

-3.8

-5.6

-6.2

-4.1

-5.1

-3.8

-3.5

-3.5

-2.8

-2.5

-2.7

-2.4

-2.7

-2.2

-3.2

-2.8

-2.5

-3.5

CHANGE

23

246

487

455

495

557

414

242

20

202

463

374

653

690

309

337

193

144

288

387

219

255

430

373

522

387

452

368

332

282

65

INFLOW

 2,785

 2,654

 2,674

 2,521

 2,680

 2,831

 2,421

 2,387

 2,408

 2,010

 1,888

 2,428

 2,425

 2,520

 3,042

 3,353

 2,167

 2,602

 2,147

 2,068

 1,882

 1,580

 1,600

 1,635

 1,634

 1,633

 1,454

 1,873

 1,618

 1,423

 1,711

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 68

 99

 93

 108

 83

 95

 92

 104

 67

 115

 82

 72

 87

 81

 93

 113

 116

 92

 68

 92

 109

 85

 88

 97

 94

 105

 99

 96

 110

 102

 93

C.F.S.

 .22

 .32

 .30

 .35

 .27

 .31

 .30

 .34

 .22

 .38

 .27

 .24

 .29

 .27

 .31

 .38

 .39

 .31

 .23

 .31

 .37

 .29

 .30

 .33

 .32

 .36

 .34

 .33

 .38

 .35

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 25, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -119.8 10,664 68,054 0 0 2,898 9.70 .00

ACRE-FEET -119,800 21,152 134,985 0 0 5,748

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 134,985

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 134,985

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2016 .00

 1,270.3

Table 4

(1) (1)
S1()-1()()316-()2 S

Gnn d Junctio n Are a 

# Ci^tff^e^ — "Your thalnes s ConnecHon " Marc h 8,201 0 Th e Honorable Raymon

d H . LaHood Secretar y U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave . S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Doclce t DOT-OST-20 1 O^^Bl * Dea r Mr . Secretary : Th e Gran d Junction , Colorad

o Are aChambe

r o f Commerce i s supportin g th e applicatio n fo r antitrus t immunit y an d propose d join t

busines s agreemen

t file d b y America n Airline s an

d Japa n Airlines . The proposed allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita

l fo r oneworl d t

o compet e effectivel y wit h th e Sta r an d Sk y Tea malliance . Thi s increase

d interallianc e competition wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o f

the Department' s Ope

n Skie s policy - first

b y solidifying U.S.-Japa

n Ope n Skies , the

n b y servin g a s afoundatio

n fo r furthe r liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Fro mth e loca l busines s communit

y perspectiv e w

e find tha t ou r businesse s ar

e increasingl

y doin g busines s acros s th e glob e wit h customer s worldwide . That , i n turn , result s in the nee

d fo r seamless , accessibl e an

d affordable internationa

l ai r service . W

e thin k approva l o f thi s application woul

d enabl e thos e oneworld allianc e airline s t o delive r highl y competitiv e ai

r transportation service s tha

t wil l benefi t Gran d Junction Chambe

r members . I urg e yo u t o quickl y approv e thi s application .

Dian e Schwenk e Presiden t CE O Gran d Junction Are aChambe

r 360 Gran d Avenue Gran d Junction , C O 8150 1 diane@gjchamber.or

g
Exhibit 32.1 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Rodney M. Tiede, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 13, 2007  /s/ Rodney M. Tiede Rodney M. Tiede Chief Executive Officer
January 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* NEW

ACRE-FEET INFLOW MELONES RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S.

62,620

1 503.69 59,397 -3,223 1,390 49 2,462 0 552 1

2 499.79 55,079 -4,318 326 83 2,231 0 268 4

3 498.54 53,753 -1,326 391 187 1,057 0 0 3

4 498.25 53,448 -305 252 57 406 0 0 0

5 500.76 56,127 2,679 1,758 18 407 0 0 0

6 501.02 56,409 282 550 39 408 0 0 0

7 500.82 56,192 -217 301 84 408 0 0 2

8 501.32 56,740 548 0 297 657 0 0 0

9 500.55 55,899 -841 1,905 246 1,659 447 220 3

10 499.79 55,079 -820 1,778 482 1,556 406 225 4

11 499.97 55,271 192 1,048 419 949 0 2 0

12 502.30 57,826 2,555 1,692 1,348 403 0 0 1

13 502.55 58,106 280 705 392 562 0 0 2

14 502.49 58,039 -67 1,912 291 1,554 0 392 0

15 501.68 57,137 -902 1,481 248 1,553 0 383 0

16 503.76 59,476 2,339 3,009 36 1,512 0 317 1

17 501.71 57,170 -2,306 671 91 1,522 0 308 4

18 501.29 56,707 -463 478 163 710 0 0 1

19 501.27 56,685 -22 394 50 403 0 0 2

20 500.89 56,268 -417 194 31 403 0 0 1

21 500.60 55,953 -315 244 33 402 0 0 1

22 500.15 55,466 -487 157 32 402 0 0 1

23 499.79 55,079 -387 209 90 401 0 0 3

24 499.43 54,695 -384 208 112 234 0 167 1

25 498.99 54,225 -470 168 91 402 0 0 3

26 499.72 55,004 779 691 606 298 0 0 0

27 499.95 55,250 246 345 271 219 0 0 2

28 500.20 55,520 270 359 281 221 0 0 2

29 500.55 55,899 379 414 352 222 0 0 1

30 500.75 56,116 217 332 272 222 0 0 1

31 501.01 56,398 282 365 315 222 0 0 1

TOTALS -6,222 23,727 7,066 24,067 853 2,834 45

ACRE-FEET -6,222 47,063 14,015 47,737 1,692 5,621 89

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

** EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 47,737 Outlet 5,621

Spill 1,692 Total 55,050

Historical Archive and Report Database

Tulloch Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/30/2023
###### Editorial Note on Part 1600

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-12, the Bureau of Land Management removed all amendments to part 1600 made effective on Jan. 11, 2017, at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016.

#### § 1610.4 Resource management planning process.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
#### Germaine Guntzer, Respondent, v. County of Westchester, Appellant.

On the court’s motion, the decision of this court handed down March 8, 1948 *(ante,*p. 902), is amended to read as follows: In an action against the County of Westchester to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff, order of the County Court, Westchester County, granting plaintiff’s motion to extend her time to serve a complaint and denying defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the action affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. An action is deemed commenced as of the date of the service of the summons in respect of a cause of action in a subsequently served original complaint; or an amended complaint served as *of course.*(Civ. Prae. Act, §§ 16, 17, 218; *Liberty Bank of Buffalo*v. *City of Buffalo,*241 App. Div. 323, 324; *Friederichsen*v. *Renard,*247 U. S. 207.) The same rule applies in respect of an amended complaint served as a matter of *grace,*where the amendment relates only to form and retains substantially the same theory of liaíúlity set out in the original complaint. *(Harriss*V. *Tams,*258 N. Y. 229, 241.) An action is deemed .commenced as of *967date o£ the service of an amended complaint when the complaint is amended as a matter of *grace*so as to set out a new cause of action based on an obligation or liability different from that originally pleaded. *(Karriss*V. *Tams,*258 H. Y. 229, 243, *supra.)*Lewis, P”. J., Carswell and Johnston, JJ., concur; Adel and Wenzel, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order, to deny plaintiff’s motion and to grant defendant’s cross motion on the authority of *Harriss*v. *Tams*(258 N. Y. 229) and *Liberty Bank of Buffalo*v. *City of Buffalo*(241 App. Div. 323). [See *post,*p. 3008.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,296.08

 2,296.09

 2,296.09

 2,296.10

 2,296.10

 2,296.10

 2,296.13

 2,296.61

 2,297.29

 2,297.77

 2,298.08

 2,298.32

 2,298.51

 2,298.70

 2,298.88

 2,299.04

 2,299.17

 2,299.30

 2,299.44

 2,299.56

 2,299.66

 2,299.78

 2,299.88

 2,299.95

 2,300.02

 2,300.15

 2,300.46

 2,300.98

 2,301.42

 2,301.85

 2,302.18

 1,416.3

 1,416.4

 1,416.4

 1,416.6

 1,416.6

 1,416.6

 1,416.9

 1,422.5

 1,430.4

 1,436.0

 1,439.6

 1,442.4

 1,444.6

 1,446.9

 1,449.0

 1,450.9

 1,452.4

 1,453.9

 1,455.6

 1,457.0

 1,458.2

 1,459.6

 1,460.8

 1,461.6

 1,462.4

 1,464.0

 1,467.6

 1,473.8

 1,479.1

 1,484.2

 1,488.1

STORAGE

+0.0

+0.1

+0.0

+0.1

+0.0

+0.0

+0.3

+5.6

+7.9

+5.6

+3.6

+2.8

+2.2

+2.2

+2.1

+1.9

+1.5

+1.5

+1.7

+1.4

+1.2

+1.4

+1.2

+0.8

+0.8

+1.5

+3.7

+6.2

+5.2

+5.1

+3.9

CHANGE

397

334

255

322

289

255

404

3,030

4,093

3,070

2,022

1,649

1,356

1,463

1,291

1,161

1,023

1,034

1,102

941

909

965

934

671

693

1,060

2,147

3,124

2,662

2,599

2,226

INFLOW

 387

 269

 255

 264

 289

 211

 229

 224

 109

 245

 194

 223

 229

 333

 219

 207

 247

 254

 267

 227

 305

 251

 337

 255

 273

 262

 293

 14

 14

 14

 226

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 7

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 44

 0

 0

 0

 3

 3

 7

 3

 7

 7

 7

 3

 7

 3

 0

 10

 0

 3

 0

 3

 21

 0

 0

 4

 0

 11

C.F.S.

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 1.14

 2.14

 .10

 .20

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 1.59

 2.87

 .24

 .56

 .09

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 13, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +71.5 43,481 7,126 0 7 156 .46 9.13

ACRE-FEET +71,500 86,245 14,134 0 14 309

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 14,134

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 14

 14,148

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 9.13

JULY 1, 2004 14.06

 1,416.3

Table 4

(1) (1)
Exhibit 99(a)

                          PRESS RELEASE

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FRIDAY
AUGUST 30, 1996





CONTACT PERSON:         STACY DUCKETT, VICE PRESIDENT
                        CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS
                        (501) 688-8229





                 TCBY ANNOUNCES JERRY BUTTERBAUGH
               NEW VICE PRESIDENT, NATIONAL ACCOUNTS



LITTLE  ROCK,  AR   -  FRIDAY,  AUGUST   30,  1996  -   TCBY
ENTERPRISES, INC.  (NYSE:TBY)  today  announced  that  Jerry
Butterbaugh  has  joined  the  Company  as  Vice  President,
National Accounts.  Mr. Butterbaugh will be responsible  for
pursuing strategic partnerships  with foodservice and  major
petroleum  companies  for  the  development  of   co-branded
locations.

Butterbaugh  has  over  20   years  of  experience  in   the
restaurant and convenience store  industries.  He began  his
career  in  the  convenience  store  industry  and  led  the
Development and Marketing departments at Kwik Shop, Inc. and
Stop-N-Go Foods,  Inc.   He then  moved to  the  foodservice
industry, directing  the  development  of  Hardee's  in  the
midwest and  upper plains.   Prior  to coming  to TCBY,  Mr.
Butterbaugh was National Director of Alternative Development
for America's Favorite Chicken Company.

TCBY  Enterprises,  Inc.,   through  subsidiary   companies,
manufactures and sells  soft serve  frozen yogurt,  hardpack
frozen  yogurt,  hardpack  ice  cream,  and  frozen  novelty
products, and markets foodservice equipment.  The Company is
the world's  largest  manufacturer -  franchisor  of  frozen
yogurt.

                                 -30-
#### § 2861.1 What requirements of part 2800 apply to my grant?

Grants issued under this part must comply with the requirements of part 2800, except as otherwise described in this part.
#### § 663.245 What is the individual employment plan?

The individual employment plan is an ongoing strategy jointly developed by the participant and the case manager that identifies the participant's employment goals, the appropriate achievement objectives, and the appropriate combination of services for the participant to achieve the employment goals.