alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2001 of
Foresight Specialists, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2003
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
-------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CFO
#### In the Matter of Village of Lawrence, Respondent, against New York State Employees’ Retirement System et al., Appellants.

*894All concur. [178 Misc. 962.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 509.24

 508.89

 509.08

 508.99

 508.77

 508.62

 508.41

 508.40

 508.84

 508.15

 508.34

 508.59

 508.39

 508.92

 508.69

 508.40

 508.44

 508.21

 508.75

 509.09

 509.02

 508.96

 508.08

 508.65

 507.99

 508.43

 508.79

 509.00

 508.49

 508.44

 509.26

 66,020

 65,585

 65,820

 65,708

 65,437

 65,252

 64,994

 64,981

 65,523

 64,674

 64,908

 65,215

 64,969

 65,622

 65,338

 64,981

 65,031

 64,748

 65,412

 65,832

 65,745

 65,671

 64,587

 65,289

 64,477

 65,018

 65,461

 65,720

 65,092

 65,031

 66,044

STORAGE

+448

-435

+235

-112

-271

-185

-258

-13

+542

-849

+234

+307

-246

+653

-284

-357

+50

-283

+664

+420

-87

-74

-1,084

+702

-812

+541

+443

+259

-628

-61

+1,013

CHANGE

2,222

1,768

2,147

2,011

1,958

2,025

2,013

1,971

2,176

1,535

2,090

2,190

1,847

2,289

1,851

1,877

2,141

1,991

2,416

2,253

1,971

1,961

1,501

2,398

1,603

2,280

2,226

2,140

1,667

1,831

2,258

INFLOW

 1,913

 1,911

 1,898

 1,897

 1,896

 1,895

 1,895

 1,893

 1,881

 1,908

 1,907

 1,965

 1,909

 1,909

 1,910

 1,910

 1,893

 1,892

 1,892

 1,898

 1,900

 1,897

 1,895

 1,909

 1,907

 1,909

 1,912

 1,913

 1,912

 1,825

 1,728

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 99

 99

 53

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 71

 60

 115

 154

 187

 207

 233

 68

 4

 34

 48

 60

 46

 31

 68

 85

 106

 126

 120

 127

 103

 87

 138

 119

 87

 80

 75

 80

 60

 22

 0

OUTLET

 12

 16

 16

 16

 12

 16

 15

 17

 18

 21

 17

 10

 16

 20

 16

 12

 18

 17

 16

 16

 12

 14

 15

 16

 18

 18

 16

 16

 12

 15

 19

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 09/04/2008

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +472 62,607 58,779 301 2,801 488

ACRE-FEET +472 124,181 116,588 597 5,556 968

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 116,588

SPILL 597 122,741

 65,572

OUTLET 5,556

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,240

 1,766

 2,124

 1,990

 1,950

 2,012

 1,978

 1,967

 2,145

 1,542

 2,042

 2,125

 1,830

 2,285

 1,839

 1,876

 2,158

 2,023

 2,415

 2,277

 2,002

 1,960

 1,515

 2,386

 1,629

 2,505

 1,960

 2,168

 1,666

 1,823

 2,258

 62,456

 123,881

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
Regulatory Evaluation 

~·~ntllolS 

Docket No. FAA- ')..0 \ S -~~ l.'-l Directorate Identifier: ~ ., • ..,,_ ? /(.I I t_.c

1

s-

{(vou make cfumges to the values in the table bd ow. you must t!n:mre the totals upda1e accordingly. {f 

They do not, click (or Tah; into and ihen out ojThe changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-u_p) our) Products 

Inspection 2.0 31 

Replacement - 4.0 $500 31 Bell crank 

Replacement - 4.0 500 31 Drive Funnel 

Adjust Airbrake 

Control System as 2.0 31 

needed 

I 

n 

' I(, 

I 

'" 

II 

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $62,620 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

' ,, . 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): The two Parts 

Cost estimates include the shipping estimate to the United States. 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • 

YES* D N0[8J 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? G 

YES* D NO [8J 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. ~ 

YES D N0[8J 

Explanation: This AD only affects 31 US registered gliders. 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? ~ 

YES* D NO [8J 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF ALTERRA CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED

I, W. Marston Becker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1
to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 of Alterra Capital Holdings Limited (the Amendment No. 1);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Amendment No. 1 does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Date: April 30, 2013



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ W. Marston Becker                
|Name:  |  | W. Marston Becker                    
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             ----------------------

                                    FORM 6-K

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                               Date: June 18, 2003

                               Given Imaging Ltd.
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

                   13 Ha'Yetzira Street, Yoqneam 20692, Israel
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X           Form 40-F
                                ---                    ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes              No  X
                                 ---             ---
<PAGE>

                                EXPLANATORY NOTE

     On June 18, 2003, Given Imaging Ltd. held its 2003 Annual General Meeting
of Shareholders in Yoqneam, Israel. At the meeting, the shareholders approved
all four proposed resolutions. A copy of the press release announcing results of
the meeting is attached to this report as Exhibit 1.

                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                        GIVEN IMAGING LTD.

Date:  June 19, 2003                    By: /s/Zvi Ben David
                                           -------------------------------------
                                            Name:   Zvi Ben David
                                            Title:  Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibit is filed as part of this Form 6-K:

Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

1.             Press release dated June 18, 2003, announcing the results of
               Given Imaging Ltd.'s 2003 Annual Shareholders Meeting.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 418

 349

 356

 264

 261

 243

 290

 295

 352

 371

 299

 297

 281

 261

 249

 303

 325

 316

 309

 311

 306

 324

 336

 296

 270

 318

 302

 321

 325

 369

 357

 252

 275

 270

 257

 240

 223

 240

 250

 286

 298

 268

 268

 253

 237

 236

 253

 297

 303

 289

 287

 283

 287

 289

 253

 254

 249

 254

 252

 311

 311

 319

 324

 312

 329

 261

 250

 232

 258

 268

 316

 348

 286

 281

 262

 248

 244

 279

 311

 309

 300

 296

 292

 307

 316

 278

 261

 284

 275

 285

 320

 347

 339

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 10, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 18,356

 17,592

 16,825

 16,011

 15,377

 14,773

 14,183

 13,572

 12,969

 12,520

 12,161

 11,775

 11,305

 10,774

 10,206

 9,711

 9,342

 9,264

 9,186

 9,062

 8,962

 8,946

 8,908

 8,865

 8,804

 8,728

 8,694

 8,677

 8,683

 8,679

 8,694

 612

 586

 561

 534

 513

 492

 473

 452

 432

 417

 405

 393

 377

 359

 340

 324

 311

 309

 306

 302

 299

 298

 297

 296

 293

 291

 290

 289

 289

 289

 290

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §3120. Trust responsibility

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to diminish or expand the trust responsibility of the United States toward Indian forest lands, or any legal obligation or remedy resulting therefrom.

(Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §321, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4544.)
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report ofRuss Berrie and Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Wille, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 9, 2004 | /s/  JOHN D.  WILLE                  |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                           |
|                       | John D. Wille                                  |
|                       | *Vice  President and**Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Russ Berrie andCompany, Inc. and will be retained by Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Skip Navigation

#         Archive-It      

Login

      - HOME
      - EXPLORE
      - LEARN MORE
      - CONTACT US

### The leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing cultural heritage on the web 

Built at the Internet Archive

        - Explore
        - Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive
        - National Endowment for the Arts

#  National Endowment for the Arts 

**Collected by:** Federal Depository Library Program Web Archive 

**Archived since:**Mar, 2017

**Description:**
Established by Congress in 1965, the NEA is the independent federal agency whose funding and support gives Americans the opportunity to participate in the arts, exercise their imaginations, and develop their creative capacities. Through partnerships with state arts agencies, local leaders, other federal agencies, and the philanthropic sector, the NEA supports arts learning, affirms and celebrates America’s rich and diverse cultural heritage, and extends its work to promote equal access to the arts in every community across America.

**Subject:**    	    Government - US Federal,     	    Arts & Humanities

**Creator:**    	    National Endowment for the Arts

**Collector:**    	    U.S. Government Publishing Office

## Narrow Your Results

### 

            There are no further ways to narrow your results.           

Sites for this collection are listed below. Narrow your results at left, or enter a search query below to		      find a site, specific URL or to search the text of archived webpages.
Clear

              - Sites
              - Search Page Text

Page 1 of 1  (9 Total Results)

**Sort By:**
                - Title (A-Z)
                - Title (Z-A)
                - URL (A-Z)
                - URL (Z-A)

### URL:     http://scua.library.umass.edu/ead/mums686.html

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://linkedin.com/company/national-endowment-for-the-arts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/art-works-podcast/id1058911829?mt=2/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://twitter.com/NEAarts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.arts.gov/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.facebook.com/NationalEndowmentfortheArts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.instagram.com/neaarts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://www.youtube.com/user/NEAarts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

### URL:     https://x.com/NEAarts/

	  	Loading Wayback Capture Info...	  

Loading video data...

Page 1 of 1  (9 Total Results)

Archive It

#### Archive-It 

*Built at the Internet Archive*
2014 Archive-ItThe leading web archiving service for collecting and accessing  cultural heritage on the web 

      - Home
      - Learn More         - About Archive-It
        - News/Press
        - Meet the Team
        - Publications
      - Contact Us
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 125

 122

 130

 132

 128

 128

 129

 131

 127

 126

 130

 130

 132

 136

 135

 135

 137

 132

 133

 130

 130

 130

 128

 132

 138

 139

 138

 137

 136

 135

 136

 119

 113

 117

 124

 121

 123

 125

 121

 113

 119

 124

 124

 122

 128

 129

 127

 128

 128

 125

 125

 125

 122

 118

 128

 131

 132

 132

 134

 130

 124

 128

 121

 118

 124

 129

 126

 125

 127

 125

 119

 122

 126

 126

 127

 130

 132

 132

 132

 130

 128

 127

 128

 125

 124

 129

 134

 136

 135

 135

 134

 129

 132

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 10, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
§ 2611.1-4 Approval of plan and contract. ( a ) After making a determination that the proposed project is economically feasible, that sufficient water can be furnished to thoroughly irrigate and reclaim the lands, that measures to avoid or mitigate adverse environmental impacts and to rehabilitate the lands if the project fails are adequate, and that State laws and regulations concerning the disposal of the lands to actual settlers are not contrary to the provisions and restrictions of the Act, the authorized officer may approve the plan. Before making this determination and approving the plan, the authorized officer may, in agreement with the State, modify the plan.
( b ) Upon approval of the plan, the grant contract may be signed by the Secretary of the Interior, or an officer in the Office of the Secretary who has been appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. A notice that the contract has been signed and the lands are segregated shall be published in the Federal Register. As a condition to entering into the contract, the Secretary or his delegate may require additional terms and conditions. If such is done, the new contract form shall be returned to the State for signing.
( c ) The contract is not final and binding until approved by the President.
( d ) After the plan has been approved, and the contract signed and approved, the lands may be entered by the State and its agents for reclamation and for residency, if appropriate.
August 31, 2011 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

Subject: Updated Reregistration Labeling Requirements for Propiconazole Products Used as 

Paints and/or Stains 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I am writing to inform you of the updated reregistration labeling requirements for 

propiconazole products used as paints and stains. Since the completion of the reregistration 

eligibility decision (RED) for propiconazole in July 2006, the Agency has updated the paints and 

stains portion of the propiconazole risk assessment based on a dermal penetration study 

submitted in April 2009. The updated risk assessment is attached. 

Based on the updated risk assessment, the Agency is making the following changes to the 

RED mitigation measures. 

1. Based on a dermal absorption rate of 1 %, the maximum percentage of propiconazole in 

paint products may remain at 0.35% and does not need to be reduced to 0.125%, as 

specified in the RED. 

2. Based on a dermal absorption rate of26.6%, the MOEs for stains were below the target 

MOE; therefore, the percentage of propiconazole in stain products must be reduced to 

0.15%. This percentage is increased from the reduction to 0.125% specified in the RED. 

The label changes in Table 1 supersede those listed in the propiconazole RED and the label 

table included in the post-RED Data Call-In notice. 

Table 1: Updated Label Changes for Paint and Stain Uses ofPropiconazole 

Description Amended Labeling Language Placement on Label 

Manufacturing Use Products 

For all Manufacturing Use "This product may not be fonnulated into stains unless the 

Products maximum concentration ofpropiconazole is less than or equal to 

0.15% by weight." 

End-Use Products Intended for Occupational Use (WPS and Non-WPS) 

Application Restrictions For "Do not apply more than [Registrant, insert amount equal to Directions for Use 

products labeled for use as 0.15% by weight] per gallon as a preservative for stains." 

material preservatives 
Please contact Rebecca von dem Hagen with any questions regarding this letter. She may 

be reached at vondem-hagen.rebecca@epa.gov or (703) 305-6785. 

lYfjly, ~ 

7 liaJ ~y 1(tJ\AIvM1'\ 

Mark Hartman, Chief 

Regulatory Management Branch II 

Antimicrobials Division 

cc: Michael Goodis, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

Kevin Costello, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division 

Lance Wormell, Antimicrobials Division 

Rebecca von dem Hagen, Antimicrobials Division