alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

UV352

UV353

£¤189

UV351

UV350

UV235

£¤191

0

UV354

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Oil and Gas Leasing Categories

Map 2-3

Alternative 3

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Unavailable for Leasing

No Surface Occupancy

Controlled Surface Use

Open with Standard Stipulations

Seasonal Limitations
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 199

 212

 209

 215

 201

 191

 187

 189

 203

 198

 202

 200

 199

 211

 203

 205

 206

 209

 207

 213

 208

 209

 203

 211

 206

 207

 210

 210

 203

 191

 178

 175

 172

 172

 172

 176

 173

 173

 173

 175

 178

 182

 186

 187

 189

 188

 190

 193

 196

 193

 193

 191

 191

 192

 192

 192

 192

 189

 186

 180

 185

 184

 182

 182

 180

 181

 179

 179

 180

 183

 184

 187

 191

 194

 194

 194

 196

 198

 200

 201

 198

 196

 195

 197

 196

 197

 198

 199

 196

 187

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 2569.412 Where can I go for help with filling out an application? You can receive help with your application at: ( a ) The BIA or a Realty Service Provider for your home area or where you plan to apply. To find the list of the Realty Service Providers, go to *https://www.bia.gov/regional-offices/alaska/real-estate-services/tribal-service-providers* or call 907-271-4104 or 1-800-645-8465.
( b ) The BLM Public Rooms: ( 1 ) The Anchorage Public Room located at 222 West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504, by email at *AK_AKSO_Public_Room@blm.gov ,* by telephone at 907-271-5960, Monday through Friday from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. excluding Federal Holidays.
( 2 ) The Fairbanks Public Room located at 222 University Ave, Fairbanks, Alaska 99709, by email at *BLM_AK_FDO_generaldelivery@blm.gov* or by telephone at 907-474-2252 or 2200, Monday through Friday from 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal Holidays.
( c ) The following BLM Field Offices: ( 1 ) Anchorage Field Office located at 4700 BLM Road, Anchorage, Alaska, by email at *blm_ak_afo_general_delivery@blm.gov ,* by phone 907-267-1246, Monday through Friday from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. excluding Federal Holidays.
( 2 ) Glennallen Field Office located at Mile Post 186.5 Glenn Highway, by email at *blm_ak_gfo_general_delivery@blm.gov ,* by phone 907-822-3217, Monday through Friday 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal Holidays.
( 3 ) Nome Field Station located at the U.S. Post Office Building, by phone 907-443-2177, Monday through Friday excluding Federal holidays.
( d ) (d) Online at the BLM website which gives answers to frequently asked questions and a mapping tool which will show the available Federal lands and provide online tools for identifying and printing your selection: *https://www.blm.gov/alaska/2019AKNativeVetsLand .*
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRUZ VILLA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner

of Social Security,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-56480

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-08992-OP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Oswald Parada, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted July 12, 2013*** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Cruz Villa appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for Social Security

FILED

SEP 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

 *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under

Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

We review de novo the district court’s decision upholding the denial of

benefits. Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir. 2012). We must affirm

the denial of benefits unless it is based on legal error or the findings of fact are not

supported by substantial evidence. Id. 

 Substantial evidence supports the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”)

determination that Villa had the residual functional capacity to perform her past

relevant work as a bus driver. The ALJ properly relied on the testimony of

vocational expert Trost because Trost provided a reasonable explanation for her

conclusion that, even though the Dictionary of Occupational Titles lists the

occupation of bus driver as generally performed at the medium exertional level, 

Villa performed her past job at a light exertional level. See Massachi v. Astrue,

486 F.3d 1149, 1153 (9th Cir. 2007). Because Trost provided sufficient support

for her conclusion, the ALJ did not err in failing to discuss vocational expert

Schneider’s earlier testimony. See id. at 1154 n.19.

2
Finally, Villa’s statement that, as a bus driver, she sat for nine hours in a

twelve-hour workday is consistent with the ALJ’s finding that Villa could sit for

six hours in an eight-hour workday.

AFFIRMED.

3
EXHIBIT
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board
of Directors


Landmark
Bancorp, Inc.:





We consent to incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-103091 on Form S-8 of
Landmark Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2010, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Landmark Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appears in
the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Landmark Bancorp,
Inc.  Our report refers to a change in accounting for
other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities.





/s/ KPMG
LLP





Kansas
City, Missouri


March 26,
2010
#### § 3162.2-5 Must I take protective action when a protective well would be uneconomic?

You are not required to take any of the actions listed in § 3162.2-4 if you can prove to BLM that when you first knew or had constructive notice of drainage you could not produce a sufficient quantity of oil or gas from a protective well on your lease for a reasonable profit above the cost of drilling, completing, and operating the protective well.

[66 FR 1893, Jan. 10, 2001]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FOR 2ND QUARTER 10Q
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000740622
<NAME> MICROENERGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,450,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (50,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,033,235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,593,986
<PP&E>                                       4,639,195
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,891,554)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,612,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,225,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       149,451
<OTHER-SE>                                          75
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,612,062
<SALES>                                      6,721,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,721,421
<CGS>                                        5,429,931
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,458,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             160,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102,270
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .001
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 12
 
 Year Ended December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Pre-tax income from continuing operations
    
    $
    56,792
    
    
    $
    49,312
    
    
    $
    33,401
    
    
    $
    40,277
    
    
    $
    58,915Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    9,589
    
    
    $
    6,289
    
    
    $
    1,885
    
    
    $
    4,968
    
    
    $
    1,140Amortized premiums
    
    
    
    
    
    
    91
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    61Interest
component of rental expense(1)
    
    
    488
    
    
    
    411
    
    
    
    352
    
    
    
    586
    
    
    
    546Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    10,077
    
    
    
    6,791
    
    
    $
    2,298
    
    
    $
    5,615
    
    
    $
    1,747Pre-tax income from continuing
operations plus fixed charges
    
    $
    66,869
    
    
    
    56,103
    
    
    $
    35,699
    
    
    $
    45,892
    
    
    $
    60,662Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    6.6x
    
    
    
    8.3x
    
    
    
    15.5x
    
    
    
    8.2x
    
    
    
    34.7x
 First ThreeQuarter Ended
    
    
    Quarters EndedOctober 1, 2005
    
    
    October 1, 2005Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
    
    $
    17,470
    
    
    $
    49,142Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    2,389
    
    
    $
    7,203Interest component of rental expense (1)
    
    
    122
    
    
    
    366Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    2,511
    
    
    $
    7,569Pre-tax income from continuing
operations plus fixed charges
    
    $
    19,981
    
    
    $
    56,711Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    8.0x
    
    
    
    7.5x
 
 The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets, effective with the year beginning January 1, 2002. If the Company had
adopted this accounting change beginning January 1, 2000, and had not amortized goodwill as under
prior accounting policies, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges would have been 36.2x and 9.5x
for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001.(1)
    
    Represents appropriate portion (1/3) of rental expense.
#### Alfredo ALVAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NFN ORTEGA, Detective, Forth Worth Police Department; Robert Rangel, Drug Enforcement Administration Agent; Terri Moore, Assistant United States Attorney; Neil Durrance, Public Defender; Kevin Fitchett, Detective, Fort Worth Police Department; Paul Gartner, C.D. Deputy Chief; Lieutenant Unknown, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 05-10405.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Alfredo Avarez, Pine Knot, KY, pro se.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Alfredo Avarez, federal prisoner # 30170-077, appeals the dismissal of his *Bivens*
      ****
      **complaint and moves for appointment of counsel. The district court held in pertinent part that Avarez’s claims were barred by *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 486, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). Avarez has failed to brief this issue and therefore has waived its review. *See Yohey v. Collins,*985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir.1993).

Avarez’s appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore dismissed as frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. His motion for appointment of counsel is denied. *See Ulmer v. Chancellor,*691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir.1982). The dismissal of his appeal as frivolous and the district court’s dismissal of his complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim consti*277tute two strikes for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). *See Adepegba v. Hammons,*103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir.1996). Alvarez is cautioned that if he obtains three strikes, he will not be able to proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. *See*§ 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43338

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

JOSE ANTONIO MARTINEZ, JR.

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 644

Filed: August 18, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Samuel A. Hoagland , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of six years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for felony domestic violence, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy

, Deputy Appellate Public Defender , Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Jose Antonio Martinez, Jr., was found guilty of felony domestic violence

. Idaho Code

§ § 18

- 903(a), 18

- 918

. The district court sentenced Martinez to a unified term of six years with

two years determinate , suspended the sentence, and pla ced Martinez on probation for six years

.

Martinez appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive

sentence

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 1 14, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Martinez ’s ju dgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. ROGERS, Appellant.

(212 N. W. 864.)

(File No. 6207.

Opinion filed April 1, 1927.)

1. Criminal Law — Jury—Weight of Testimony is for Jury. Weight of testimony is peculiarly within province of jury.

2. Criminal Law — Credibility of Witnesses is for Jury. Credibility of witnesses is peculiarly within province of jury.

Note. — See, Headnote (1.), American Key-Numbered Digest, Criminal law, Key-No. 741(1), 16 C. J. Sec. 2290; (2) Criminal law, Key-No. 742(1), 16 C. J. Sec. 2291.

Appeal from Municipal Court of Sioux Ealls; Hon. Ransom L. Gibbs, Judge.

Richard Rogers was convicted of assault, and he appeals.

Affirmed.

*Parliman & Parlimcm,*of -Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*Buell F. Jones,*Attorney General, and *Bernard A. Brown,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

'CAMPBELL, P. J.

Defendant was tried in the municipal court of the city of Sioux Ealls for- the crime of assault. He was *180found guilty by a jury, and upon such verdict judgment was duly entered that he pay a fine of $100, from which judgment, and from the order denying his motion for new trial, defendant appeals.

[1, 2] Appellant’s sole contention in this court is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict.

The stories of the various witnesses were considerably in conflict. We have examined the record with care, and think no useful purpose would be served by setting out the testimony. It is sufficient to say that there is in the record testimony introduced by the state which, if believed by the jury, is ample to support the verdict. True, much of this testimony is disputed by defendant and his witnesses. But, the weight of testimony and credibility of the witnesses being peculiarly within the province of the jury, this court will not under such circumstances interfere with the verdict.

The judgment and order appealed from must be, and they are, affirmed.

POEUEY and BfUfRCH, JJ„ concur.

GATES and SHERWOOD, JJ., not sitting.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In  connection  with the form 10-KSB of Health  Discovery  Corporation  formerly
Direct  Wireless  Communications  Inc. for the Year ended  December 31, 2004, I,
Stephen  D.  Barnhill,   M.D.,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Health  Discovery
Corporation,  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of my knowledge  and
belief, that;

such Form 10-KSB for the year ended,  December 31, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934;
and

the  information  contained  in such  Form  10-KSB  for the year  ended,  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operation of Health Discovery Corporation.

/s/ Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.
----------------------------
Stephen D. Barnhill, M.D.
Chief Administrative Officer


                                     E-100
#### Isabelle Berwick, Respondent, v. Katherine Martin and William Martin, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. There is no excep*871tion that presents a question for review. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Staple-ton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 912

 941

 949

 897

 891

 897

 954

 956

 800

 740

 663

 664

 636

 632

 694

 738

 755

 768

 773

 798

 820

 826

 788

 792

 728

 714

 655

 697

 872

 909

 897

 868

 871

 872

 881

 831

 696

 637

 645

 638

 583

 582

 631

 693

 734

 728

 762

 773

 797

 776

 775

 709

 673

 567

 623

 531

 890

 924

 925

 878

 885

 886

 914

 909

 718

 684

 657

 656

 603

 600

 663

 715

 744

 760

 768

 781

 806

 804

 782

 761

 700

 612

 638

 637

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 24,219

 24,218

 24,209

 24,128

 24,045

 23,974

 23,920

 23,867

 23,629

 23,319

 23,022

 22,704

 22,373

 22,084

 21,862

 21,714

 21,565

 21,508

 21,492

 21,675

 21,992

 22,325

 22,665

 22,949

 23,121

 23,116

 23,067

 22,954

 807

 807

 807

 804

 802

 799

 797

 796

 788

 777

 767

 757

 746

 736

 729

 724

 719

 717

 716

 723

 733

 744

 756

 765

 771

 771

 769

 765

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Morgan
Products Form 10-Q as of September 28, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such Form 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                           1,717
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,463
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,341
<INVENTORY>                                     67,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,577
<PP&E>                                          51,538
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,367
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,787
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,805
<BONDS>                                         55,023
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,392
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,787
<SALES>                                         97,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,377
<CGS>                                           82,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (80)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 778
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    529
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (406)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                935
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
#### Hyman Goldman, Respondent, v. Nu-Boro Park Cleaners, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
#### White-Way Arcade, Inc., v. Broadway Turtle King, Inc.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted on condition that the tenant furnish a surety company undertaking in the sum of $20,000 to secure payment for the use and occupation of the premises from January 1, 1947, until the determination of the appeal by the Court of Appeals. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 281; *post,*p. 964.]