alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2812.3-7 Permittee's agreement with United States respecting compensation and adjustment of road use. ( a ) Where the United States receives rights over any road, right-of-way, or lands, controlled directly or indirectly by a permittee, the authorized officer will seek to arrive at an advance agreement with the permittee respecting any or all of such matters as the time, route, and specifications for the development of the road system in the area; the total volume of timber to be moved over such road system, and the proportion of such timber which belongs to the United States or is embraced in a cooperative agreement for coordinated management with timber of the United States managed by the Bureau; the consequent proportion of the capital costs of the road system to be borne by such timber of the United States or embraced in such cooperative agreement; the period of time over, or rate at which, the United States or its licensees shall be required to amortise such capital cost; provisions for road maintenance; the use in addition to the uses set forth in § 2812.3-5 which the United States and its licensees may make of the road system involved, a formula for determining the proportionate capacity of the road system or portions thereof which shall be available to the United States and its licensees for the transportation of forest products; the amount and type of insurance to be carried, and the type of security to be furnished by licensees of the United States who use such road; and such other similar matters as the authorized officer may deem appropriate. To the extent necessary to fulfill the obligations of the United States under any such advance agreement, subsequent contracts for the sale of timber managed by the Bureau and tapped by such road system, and subsequent cooperative agreements for the coordinated management of such timber with other timber, will contain such provisions as may be necessary or appropriate to require such licensees to comply with the terms of the advance agreement. Where such an advance agreement between the United States and the permittee includes provisions relating to the route and specifications for extensions of the road system involved, the authorized officer may agree that upon the filing of proper applications in the future the applicant or his successor in interest shall receive the necessary permits for such road extensions as may cross lands managed by the Bureau: *Provided, however,* That the applicant shall have substantially complied with the terms of such advance agreement and of the outstanding permits theretofore issued to him.
( b ) The provisions of § 2812.4 shall not be applicable to any matters embraced in an agreement made pursuant to this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 753

 706

 732

 738

 795

 803

 799

 771

 774

 779

 741

 703

 714

 710

 685

 682

 685

 655

 698

 697

 668

 623

 599

 623

 649

 650

 698

 694

 730

 746

 699

 680

 686

 704

 714

 768

 716

 732

 707

 718

 699

 637

 648

 655

 651

 650

 638

 615

 594

 630

 619

 568

 534

 565

 575

 560

 536

 633

 633

 650

 728

 697

 700

 729

 731

 784

 770

 754

 739

 732

 720

 675

 692

 685

 668

 668

 668

 638

 637

 679

 647

 590

 564

 595

 612

 609

 645

 667

 681

 693

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 13, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40641 

Conference Calendar

__________________

CLEMMIE R. WICKWARE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES A. COLLINS ET AL.,

Defendants,

K. KUYKENDALL,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:92-CV-73

- - - - - - - - - -

February 29, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Clemmie R. Wickware filed an appeal from the magistrate

judge's denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction;

nevertheless, he has failed to brief this issue. Issues which

are not briefed are waived. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Wickware argues that the magistrate judge erred in

dismissing his claims against the defendants other than Dr.

Kuykendall. As these issues do not concern the denial of the
No. 95-40641

-2-

preliminary injunction, we lack jurisdiction to consider them. 

Lakedreams v. Taylor, 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991); 28

U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). This appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED

as such. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Wickware previously has been warned by this court that he

may be sanctioned for filing further frivolous pleadings. 

Accordingly, Wickware is barred from filing any pro se, in forma

pauperis, civil appeal in this court, or any pro se, in forma

pauperis, initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to

this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission

of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this

court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this

Circuit are directed to return to Wickware, unfiled, any

attempted submission inconsistent with this bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
(No. 74-CC-488

#### Ivan L. Ford, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 8, 1974.*

Ivan L. Ford, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 128

 168

 122

 129

 111

 125

 125

 127

 131

 168

 182

 124

 129

 128

 124

 126

 124

 183

 126

 127

 126

 137

 127

 115

 126

 101

 99

 102

 99

 95

 92

 121

 109

 116

 99

 95

 112

 120

 124

 128

 127

 123

 118

 122

 123

 122

 120

 118

 124

 122

 115

 110

 105

 111

 105

 101

 98

 97

 96

 95

 90

 89

 123

 138

 118

 111

 103

 117

 123

 125

 130

 130

 142

 120

 125

 125

 123

 122

 120

 141

 124

 122

 112

 121

 114

 111

 104

 100

 98

 98

 96

 92

 90

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

HIGH LOW MEAN

 56.7

 58.6

 56.4

 56.8

 56.0

 56.3

 57.6

 58.5

 57.8

 56.9

 56.8

 58.2

 60.0

 59.8

 61.3

 62.7

 63.9

 64.8

 66.4

 66.2

 63.5

 61.5

 59.5

 59.1

 59.7

 61.6

 62.9

 63.9

 62.6

 60.3

 60.3

 55.6

 55.3

 55.0

 54.3

 52.8

 53.4

 53.2

 53.5

 53.7

 52.2

 52.1

 52.7

 54.2

 55.5

 56.1

 58.1

 59.3

 59.5

 60.3

 60.8

 60.7

 59.3

 55.1

 54.4

 55.5

 57.2

 58.7

 59.5

 59.8

 56.6

 56.3

 56.2

 56.5

 55.5

 55.4

 54.5

 54.8

 55.2

 55.8

 55.7

 54.6

 54.5

 55.2

 56.9

 57.5

 58.4

 60.4

 61.3

 61.8

 63.0

 63.4

 62.0

 60.4

 57.6

 56.9

 57.7

 59.3

 60.7

 61.7

 61.4

 58.8

 58.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.9

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 8.8

 9.0

 9.2

 9.2

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.2

 9.0

 9.0

 8.9

 8.6

 8.6

 8.8

 8.6

 9.4

 9.6

 9.4

 9.0

 8.8

 8.9

 8.8

 9.2

 9.3

 8.8

 8.7

 8.8

 8.9

 8.6

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 9.0

 9.1

 9.1

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.0

 7.9

 8.1

 8.0

 8.5

 8.9

 9.1

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.5

 8.9

 8.8

 8.8

 8.9

 9.1

 9.0

 8.6

 8.8

 8.9

 8.9

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.1

 9.0

 9.0

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.3

 8.9

 9.2

 9.2

 8.8

 8.6

 8.6

 8.5

 8.9

 9.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-137565 and Form S-8 No. 333-167494) pertaining to the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and the Third Amended and Restated 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our reports dated March 2, 2015 , with respect to the consolidated financial statements and Schedule 12-14 of MCG Capital Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MCG Capital Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2014 .


/s/  Ernst & Young LLP


McLean, Virginia


March 2, 2015
#### § 3137.131 What happens if the unit terminated before the unit operator met the initial development obligations?

If the unit terminated before the unit operator met the initial development obligations, BLM's approval of the unit agreement is revoked. You, as lessee, forfeit all further benefits, including extensions and suspensions, granted any NPR-A lease because of having been committed to the unit. Any lease that the BLM extended because of being committed to the unit would expire unless it had been granted an extension or renewal under § 3135.1-5 or § 3135.1-6.

[67 FR 17886, Apr. 11, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 6444, Feb. 4, 2008]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 365

 351

 349

 341

 332

 337

 327

 319

 322

 320

 314

 317

 307

 291

 298

 306

 302

 292

 287

 281

 289

 292

 289

 292

 291

 294

 289

 292

 283

 273

 327

 326

 315

 309

 298

 304

 292

 272

 285

 269

 282

 279

 273

 255

 268

 260

 274

 273

 272

 274

 265

 266

 260

 260

 267

 264

 265

 260

 256

 255

 345

 339

 327

 322

 317

 318

 307

 296

 300

 296

 297

 294

 288

 277

 279

 280

 282

 278

 278

 277

 278

 275

 273

 273

 273

 276

 271

 267

 264

 263

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 18, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 2091.7 Segregation and opening of lands classified for a specific use.
### §4181. Termination of Indian housing assistance under United States Housing Act of 1937

#### (a) Termination of assistance

After September 30, 1997, financial assistance may not be provided under the United States Housing Act of 1937 [42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.] or pursuant to any commitment entered into under such Act, for Indian housing developed or operated pursuant to a contract between the Secretary and an Indian housing authority, unless such assistance is provided from amounts made available for fiscal year 1997 and pursuant to a commitment entered into before September 30, 1997. Any housing that is the subject of a contract for tenant-based assistance between the Secretary and an Indian housing authority that is terminated under this section shall, for the following fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, be considered to be a dwelling unit under section 4152(b)(1) of this title.

#### (b) Termination of restrictions on use of Indian housing

After September 30, 1997, any housing developed or operated pursuant to a contract between the Secretary and an Indian housing authority pursuant to the United States Housing Act of 1937 [42 U.S.C. 1437 et seq.] shall not be subject to any provision of such Act or any annual contributions contract or other agreement pursuant to such Act, but shall be considered and maintained as affordable housing for purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title V, §502, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4043; Pub. L. 106–568, title X, §1003(k)(3), Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2930; Pub. L. 106–569, title V, §503(j)(3), Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2966.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The United States Housing Act of 1937, referred to in text, is act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 896, as revised generally by Pub. L. 93–383, title II, §201(a), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 653, which is classified generally to chapter 8 (§1437 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1437 of Title 42 and Tables.

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–568 and Pub. L. 106–569 amended subsec. (a) identically, inserting at end "Any housing that is the subject of a contract for tenant-based assistance between the Secretary and an Indian housing authority that is terminated under this section shall, for the following fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, be considered to be a dwelling unit under section 4152(b)(1) of this title."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 104–330, title V, §508, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4045, provided that: "Sections 502, 503, and 507 [25 U.S.C. 4181, 4182, 4183] shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this Act [Oct. 26, 1996]."
§ 3100.40 Public availability of information. ( a ) All data and information concerning Federal and Indian minerals submitted under this part 3100 and parts 3120 through 3190 of this chapter are subject to 43 CFR part 2, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section. 43 CFR part 2 includes the regulations of the Department of the Interior covering the public disclosure of data and information contained in Department of the Interior records. Certain mineral information not protected from public disclosure under 43 CFR part 2 may be made available for inspection without a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552) request.
( b ) When you submit data and information under this part 3100 and parts 3120 through 3190 of this chapter that you believe to be exempt from disclosure to the public, you must clearly mark each page that you believe includes confidential information. The BLM will keep all such data and information confidential to the extent allowed by 43 CFR 2.26.
( c ) Under the Indian Mineral Development Act of 1982 (IMDA) (25 U.S.C. 2101 *et seq.*), the Department of the Interior will hold as privileged proprietary information of the affected Indian or Indian Tribe— ( 1 ) All findings forming the basis of the Secretary's intent to approve or disapprove any Minerals Agreement under IMDA; and
( 2 ) All projections, studies, data, or other information concerning a Minerals Agreement under IMDA, regardless of the date received, related to: ( i ) The terms, conditions, or financial return to the Indian parties;
( ii ) The extent, nature, value, or disposition of the Indian mineral resources; or
( iii ) The production, products, or proceeds thereof.
( d ) For information concerning Indian minerals not covered by paragraph (c) of this section: ( 1 ) The BLM will withhold such records as may be withheld under an exemption to FOIA when it receives a request for information related to tribal or Indian minerals held in trust or subject to restrictions on alienation;
( 2 ) The BLM will notify the Indian mineral owner(s) identified in the records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and give them a reasonable period of time to state objections to disclosure, using the standards and procedures of 43 CFR 2.28, before making a decision about the applicability of FOIA exemption 4 to: ( i ) Information obtained from a person outside the United States Government; when
( ii ) Following consultation with a submitter under 43 CFR 2.28, the BLM determines that the submitter does not have an interest in withholding the records that can be protected under FOIA; but
( iii ) The BLM has reason to believe that disclosure of the information may result in commercial or financial injury to the Indian mineral owner(s) but is uncertain that such is the case.
#### William McDonald, Respondent, v. John F. Softy, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and complaint dismissed, with costs of the action and of this appeal. The only actionable negligence alleged in the complaint is defendant’s failure “to provide and install scaffolding, aprons or other appliances or devices to catch and prevent mortar or other articles from falling upon persons working below.” The evidence introduced on the part of plaintiff fails to establish either that it was customary to have such appliances under the circumstances here disclosed, or that it was practicable to do so. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ., concurred.
§ 667.810 What rules of procedure apply to hearings conducted under this subpart? ( a ) *Rules of practice and procedure.* The rules of practice and procedure promulgated by the OALJ at subpart A of 29 CFR part 18, govern the conduct of hearings under this subpart. However, a request for hearing under this subpart is not considered a complaint to which the filing of an answer by DOL or a DOL agency or official is required. Technical rules of evidence will not apply to hearings conducted pursuant to this part. However, rules or principles designed to assure production of the most credible evidence available and to subject testimony to cross-examination will apply.
( b ) *Prehearing procedures.* In all cases, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) should encourage the use of prehearing procedures to simplify and clarify facts and issues.
( c ) *Subpoenas.* Subpoenas necessary to secure the attendance of witnesses and the production of documents or other items at hearings must be obtained from the ALJ and must be issued under the authority contained in section 183(c) of the Act, incorporating 15 U.S.C. 49.
( d ) *Timely submission of evidence.* The ALJ must not permit the introduction at the hearing of any documentation if it has not been made available for review by the other parties to the proceeding either at the time ordered for any prehearing conference, or, in the absence of such an order, at least 3 weeks prior to the hearing date.
( e ) *Burden of production.* The Grant Officer has the burden of production to support her or his decision. To this end, the Grant Officer prepares and files an administrative file in support of the decision which must be made part of the record. Thereafter, the party or parties seeking to overturn the Grant Officer's decision has the burden of persuasion.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4547 

To require a report on efforts by Venezuelan state actors and transnational 

criminal organizations to capture and detain United States citizens as 

hostages. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2022 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require a report on efforts by Venezuelan state actors 

and transnational criminal organizations to capture and 

detain United States citizens as hostages. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON EFFORTS TO CAPTURE AND DE4 TAIN UNITED STATES CITIZENS AS HOS5 TAGES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State 

8 shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4547 IS

1 a report on efforts by the Government of Venezuela to de2 tain United States citizens and permanent residents. 

3 (b) ELEMENTS.—The report required under sub4 section (a) shall include, regarding the seizure and detain5 ment of United States citizens or permanent resident 

6 aliens— 

7 (1) the names and positions of Venezuelan per8 sons or those acting on their behalf who have en9 gaged in those activities; 

10 (2) a description of any roles played by 

11 transnational criminal organizations, and an identi12 fication of those organizations; and 

13 (3) where relevant, an assessment of whether 

14 and how United States citizens and permanent resi15 dent aliens have been lured to Venezuela. 

16 (c) FORM.—The report required under subsection (a) 

17 shall be submitted in unclassified form, but shall include 

18 a classified annex listing the total number of United 

19 States citizens and permanent resident aliens presently in 

20 custody of Venezuelan state actors operating in the hemi21 sphere. 

22 (d) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DE23 FINED.—In this Act, the term ‘‘appropriate committees of 

24 Congress’’ means— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4547 IS

1 (1) the Committee on Foreign Relations and 

2 the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate; and 

3 (2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the 

4 Committee on Armed Services of the House of Rep5 resentatives. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 299

 299

 295

 285

 289

 281

 263

 292

 292

 291

 282

 284

 260

 270

 300

 287

 270

 258

 265

 254

 261

 269

 292

 275

 246

 248

 252

 234

 237

 227

 229

 233

 246

 244

 238

 233

 230

 223

 223

 222

 223

 219

 213

 213

 216

 220

 215

 212

 211

 213

 215

 213

 210

 201

 199

 195

 192

 190

 191

 192

 254

 255

 262

 261

 255

 250

 244

 249

 250

 256

 246

 240

 232

 237

 242

 243

 240

 231

 230

 228

 230

 229

 228

 223

 213

 212

 209

 205

 205

 208

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER