alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 501.30

 501.09

 500.69

 500.35

 499.95

 499.54

 499.13

 498.73

 500.26

 500.62

 500.55

 502.28

 505.09

 505.58

 503.51

 501.47

 500.85

 499.79

 500.64

 501.54

 501.35

 500.54

 501.05

 501.01

 501.04

 500.70

 500.36

 501.51

 500.51

 56,718

 56,486

 56,051

 55,682

 55,250

 54,812

 54,375

 53,952

 55,585

 55,975

 55,899

 57,804

 61,013

 61,589

 59,191

 56,905

 56,224

 55,079

 55,997

 56,983

 56,773

 55,888

 56,442

 56,398

 56,431

 56,062

 55,693

 56,950

 55,856

STORAGE

-221

-232

-435

-369

-432

-438

-437

-423

+1,633

+390

-76

+1,905

+3,209

+576

-2,398

-2,286

-681

-1,145

+918

+986

-210

-885

+554

-44

+33

-369

-369

+1,257

-1,094

CHANGE

194

206

101

118

83

79

82

386

1,125

497

249

1,339

2,066

1,371

371

544

1,358

722

3,261

3,323

2,722

2,364

3,042

2,573

2,507

2,288

2,294

3,618

2,921

INFLOW

 305

 320

 318

 301

 300

 300

 299

 296

 296

 297

 286

 372

 448

 1,081

 1,578

 1,692

 1,699

 694

 1,695

 1,701

 1,711

 1,711

 1,703

 1,703

 1,705

 1,700

 1,701

 1,698

 1,700

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 546

 1,022

 1,044

 1,070

 1,055

 1,015

 822

 718

 705

 711

 1,238

 1,699

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 300

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 57

 79

 78

 46

 41

 44

 68

 65

 67

 62

 47

 68

OUTLET

 0

 3

 2

 3

 1

 0

 3

 3

 6

 3

 1

 7

 0

 0

 2

 5

 2

 2

 2

 3

 1

 3

 1

 2

 2

 2

 6

 1

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/14/2000

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,083 41,804 29,610 11,645 1,022 72

ACRE-FEET -1,083 82,918 58,731 23,098 2,027 143

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 58,731

SPILL 23,098 83,856

 56,939

OUTLET 2,027

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 6

 13

 13

 100

 0

 14

 0

 2

 1,269

 481

 1

 2

 1

 0

 0

 13

 1,072

 1,812

 3,433

 3,494

 2,508

 1,607

 2,171

 2,566

 2,576

 1,500

 1,050

 3,282

 2,185

 31,171

 61,828

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
EXHIBIT 99.1


KERR-McGEE CORPORATION
Kerr-McGee Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING
                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


I, Luke R. Corbett,  the Chief Executive Officer of Kerr-McGee  Corporation (the
"Issuer"),  in compliance  with 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify in connection with
the Issuer's  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period that ended  December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") that:

     o    the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o    information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
          respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
          Issuer.


/s/ Luke R. Corbett
______________________

Luke R. Corbett
Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003
### §305c. Appropriation

There is authorized to be appropriated out of any sums in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated such sums as may be necessary to defray the expenses of the Board and carry out the purposes and provisions of this Act. All income derived by the Board from any source shall be covered into the Treasury of the United States and shall constitute a special fund which is appropriated and made available until expended for carrying out the purposes and provisions of this Act. Out of the funds available to it at any time the Board may authorize such expenditures, consistent with the provisions of this Act, as it may determine to be necessary for the accomplishment of the purposes and objectives of this Act.

(Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 748, §4, 49 Stat. 892.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 27, 1935, ch. 748, 49 Stat. 891, which is classified generally to section 305 et seq. of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT NO. 11

CANYON RESOURCES CORPORATION
CALCULATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY-DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      THREE MONTHS ENDED                  NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                         SEPTEMBER 30,                      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                     1997             1996             1997              1996
                                                 ------------      ----------      ------------      ------------

<S>                                              <C>               <C>             <C>               <C>          
Computation for Statement of Operations
--------------------------------------------

Adjustment to net income (loss) per
  statements of operations to amount used in
  earnings (loss) per share computation:

  Net income (loss)                              $   (961,500)     $ (838,000)     $   (666,600)     $ (2,665,900)

  Add interest on convertible
     debentures, net of tax effect                       --               (A)                --               (A)
                                                 ------------      ----------      ------------      ------------

  Net income (loss), as adjusted                 $   (961,500)     $ (838,000)     $   (666,600)     $ (2,665,900)
                                                 ============      ==========      ============      ============


Adjustment to weighted average shares
  outstanding to amount used in earnings
  (loss) per share computation:

  Weighted average shares outstanding              41,048,700      37,453,600        39,114,600        31,866,100

  Additional shares issuable from
      assumed exercise of options and
      warrants                                            (A)             (A)               (A)               (A)
                                                 ------------      ----------      ------------      ------------
  Average shares outstanding,
      as adjusted                                  41,048,700      37,453,600        39,114,600        31,866,100
                                                 ============      ==========      ============      ============

  Net income (loss) per share                    $      (0.02)     $    (0.02)     $      (0.02)     $      (0.08)
                                                 ============      ==========      ============      ============
</TABLE>


A. Effect is antidilutive, so amounts are not included in the earnings (loss)
   per share calculation.
#### James J. Skelly, Respondent, v. Alpha Tank Company, Inc., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered on a jury verdict in his favor, in the sum of $48,000. Judgment reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs *to*abide the event, unless within ten days *after*the entry of the order hereon respondent stipulates to reduce the amount of the verdict to $35,000, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is unanimously affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
#### § 2653.8-3 Appeals.

Appeals from decisions made by the Bureau of Land Management on applications filed pursuant to section 14(h)(5) of the Act shall be made to the Board of Land Appeals in accordance with 43 CFR part 4, subpart E.

[41 FR 14740, Apr. 7, 1976]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Sectored-One-Dimensional Model for Simulating Combustion Instabilities in Premix CombustorsA one-dimensional, CFD based combustor simulation has been developed that exhibits self-excited, thermoacoustic oscillations in premixed combustor geometries that typically have large, abrupt changes in cross sectional area. The combustor geometry is approximated by dividing it into a finite number of one-dimensional sectors. Within each sector, the equations of motion are integrated numerically, along with a species transport and a reaction equation. Across the sectors, mass and energy are conserved, and momentum loss is prescribed using appropriately compatible boundary conditions that account for the area change. The resulting simulation and associated boundary conditions essentially represent a one-dimensional, multi-block technique. Details of the simulation code are presented herein. Results are then shown comparing experimentally observed and simulated operation of a particular combustor rig that exhibited different instabilities at different operating points. It will be shown that the simulation closely matched the rig data in oscillation amplitudes, frequencies, and operating points at which the instabilities occurred. Finally, advantages and limitations of the simulation technique are discussed.Document ID20000021217Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPaxson, Daniel E.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1999Subject CategoryInorganic, Organic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1999-209771E-12051NAS 1.15:209771AIAA Paper 2000-0313Meeting InformationMeeting: 38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and ExhibitLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 10, 2000End Date: January 13, 2000Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-26-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000021217.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 2563.1 Purchase of tracts not exceeding 5 acres, on showing as to employment or business (Act of March 3, 1927). ( a ) *Notice of initiation of claim.* A notice of the initiation of a claim under the Act of March 3, 1927, must designate the kind of trade, manufacture, or other productive industry in connection with which the claim is maintained or desired, and identify its ownership. The procedure as to notices will be governed in other respects by the provisions of § 2563.2-1(a) to (d).
( b ) [Reserved]
### §233. Jurisdiction of New York State courts in civil actions

The courts of the State of New York under the laws of such State shall have jurisdiction in civil actions and proceedings between Indians or between one or more Indians and any other person or persons to the same extent as the courts of the State shall have jurisdiction in other civil actions and proceedings, as now or hereafter defined by the laws of such State: Provided, That the governing body of any recognized tribe of Indians in the State of New York shall have the right to declare, by appropriate enactment prior to September 13, 1952, those tribal laws and customs which they desire to preserve, which, on certification to the Secretary of the Interior by the governing body of such tribe shall be published in the Federal Register and thereafter shall govern in all civil cases involving reservation Indians when the subject matter of such tribal laws and customs is involved or at issue, but nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent such courts from recognizing and giving effect to any tribal law or custom which may be proven to the satisfaction of such courts: Provided further, That nothing in this section shall be construed to require any such tribe or the members thereof to obtain fish and game licenses from the State of New York for the exercise of any hunting and fishing rights provided for such Indians under any agreement, treaty, or custom: Provided further, That nothing herein contained shall be construed as subjecting the lands within any Indian reservation in the State of New York to taxation for State or local purposes, nor as subjecting any such lands, or any Federal or State annuity in favor of Indians or Indian tribes, to execution on any judgment rendered in the State courts, except in the enforcement of a judgment in a suit by one tribal member against another in the matter of the use or possession of land: And provided further, That nothing herein contained shall be construed as authorizing the alienation from any Indian nation, tribe, or band of Indians of any lands within any Indian reservation in the State of New York: Provided further, That nothing herein contained shall be construed as conferring jurisdiction on the courts of the State of New York or making applicable the laws of the State of New York in civil actions involving Indian lands or claims with respect thereto which relate to transactions or events transpiring prior to September 13, 1952.

(Sept. 13, 1950, ch. 947, §1, 64 Stat. 845.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Act Sept. 13, 1950, ch. 947, §2, 64 Stat. 846, provided: "This Act [this section] shall take effect two years after the date of its passage [Sept. 13, 1950]."
## .J0 0S0! V VING 

# ry

~ / /~~- 

# _ `

~ 

## pR TN ~ 

# WEikfi

. 

# esviii

.e Missouri
m

— 11 ~ — 1. ---- . ......... 

### September 5, 2014 Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief of the Essential Air Service Division Mr. Albert Muldoon 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Schlemmer and Mr. Muldoon: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Essential Air Services proposals submitted for air service at the Waynesville/St. Robert Regional Airport at Forney Field on Fort Leonard Wood. Our commitment to air service for our communities led to a unique partnership between the Cities of Waynesville, St. Robert and Fort Leonard Wood. As the civilian sponsors of the existing joint use Agreement on Fort Leonard Wood, the continuance of viable air service from the Fort Leonard Wood 

### Region is of prime importance to the Cities of St. Robert and Waynesville and our regional neighbors. Although, we were pleased with the submitted proposals, based on our review of the EAS proposals, the Cities of Waynesville and St. Robert recommend accepting the proposal submitted by Cape Air. The cities are pleased with the proposal of Cape Air and recommend Cape Air as the best balance between value and service for our community. The Cities of Waynesville and St. Robert would also like to recommend a four (4) year contract. On behalf of the Cities of Waynesville and St. Robert, thank you for your continued support of the EAS program. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you need further input. Sincerely,



### ~ GMayor Luge Hardman City of Waynesville

Mayor Luge Hardman 601 Historic 66 West City Administrator Bruce 1
- Iarrill Waynesville, MO 65583 City Clerk Carol Welch Phone: (573) 774-6171 Fax: (573) 774-5647
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 155

 154

 151

 146

 145

 144

 146

 147

 144

 137

 134

 134

 133

 130

 132

 131

 126

 126

 127

 128

 130

 130

 130

 132

 135

 134

 133

 136

 134

 136

 140

 152

 151

 145

 144

 143

 141

 144

 144

 137

 133

 132

 132

 128

 127

 130

 126

 125

 122

 122

 127

 127

 129

 127

 129

 132

 133

 130

 132

 131

 133

 136

 154

 153

 148

 145

 144

 142

 145

 146

 140

 135

 133

 133

 131

 129

 131

 129

 126

 125

 124

 127

 128

 130

 128

 130

 133

 133

 132

 134

 133

 134

 138

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 4,825

 4,863

 4,853

 4,821

 4,803

 4,791

 4,774

 4,743

 4,697

 4,645

 4,597

 4,545

 4,489

 4,439

 4,410

 4,391

 4,365

 4,339

 4,314

 4,293

 4,268

 4,244

 4,217

 4,186

 4,155

 4,123

 4,097

 4,081

 4,068

 4,055

 4,039

 161

 162

 162

 161

 160

 160

 159

 158

 157

 155

 153

 152

 150

 148

 147

 146

 146

 145

 144

 143

 142

 141

 141

 140

 139

 137

 137

 136

 136

 135

 135

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 2566.0-7 Cross references. ( a ) Sales of railroad townsites in Alaska, provided for by Executive Order 3489 of June 10, 1921, §§ 2566.1(a) to (f) and 2566.0-3(a), will be made by the authorized officer in Alaska, as superintendent of sales of railroad townsites in accordance with townsite regulations contained in §§ 2760.0-3 to 2761.2(e) so far as those regulations are applicable.
( b ) For surveys, Alaska, see part 9180 of this chapter. For townsites, Alaska, see § 2565.0-7.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 450

 415

 398

 410

 398

 455

 445

 570

 652

 697

 741

 800

 828

 860

 920

 934

 998

 999

 1,023

 1,174

 1,053

 1,062

 1,091

 1,092

 1,101

 1,099

 1,226

 1,071

 1,050

 1,081

 1,047

 345

 373

 324

 329

 312

 376

 382

 434

 573

 621

 666

 688

 786

 818

 853

 896

 928

 918

 994

 900

 883

 926

 916

 991

 1,011

 904

 959

 868

 920

 914

 844

 400

 397

 360

 380

 358

 413

 410

 506

 612

 666

 703

 757

 814

 848

 887

 920

 946

 970

 1,007

 980

 975

 1,000

 1,040

 1,033

 1,080

 1,029

 1,034

 947

 992

 994

 939

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Suzuki, Debra

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 6:07 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Subject: FW: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction SIP Call Final Action

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

From: Suzuki, Debra  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:57 PM

To: denise.koch@alaska.gov

Cc: Kelly, Kate; Dave Bray

Subject: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction SIP Call Final Action

Hi Denise. This message is a follow-up to Kate’s recent phone call notifying you about the final 

action the EPA Administrator signed today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that 

apply to sources at all times, including when the source is operating during periods of startup, 

shutdown, or malfunction (SSM). 

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians 

concerning the treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, 

specifically how those emissions are treated in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the 

EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, EPA has revised and clarified its policy 

concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act. 

The EPA is calling for 36 states, including Alaska, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public 

health and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy. Your state 

will have 18 months to submit revisions of your state plan to EPA. Your state’s revised SIP is due to 

EPA by November 22, 2016. 

As part of our notification to your state about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter 

from the EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe. To inform you 

of the details on the final action, including the specific SIP provisions your state needs to address, 

we have posted a pre-publication version of the action on our website 

at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html. 

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as 

possible. If you or your staff have questions, please feel free to contact me at 206-553-0985 or 

Dave Bray at 206-553-4253. 

Thank you, 

Debra Suzuki 

EPA Region 10 

Air Planning Unit Manager
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Assessment of SeaWiFS and MODIS Ocean CoverageOcean coverages of SeaWiFS and MODIS were assessed for three seasons by considering monthly mean values of surface winds speeds and cloud cover. Mean and maximum coverages combined SeaWiFS and MODIS by considering combined coverages for ten-degree increments of the MODIS orbital mean anomaly. From this analysis the mean and maximum combined coverages for SeaWiFS and MODIS were determined for one and four-day periods for spring, summer, and winter seasons. Loss of coverage due to Sun glint and cloud cover were identified for both the individual and combined cases. Our analyses indicate that MODIS will enhance ocean coverage for all three seasons examined. ne combined SeaWiFS/MODIS show an increase of coverage of 42.2% to 48.7% over SeaWiFS alone for the three seasons studied; the increase in maximum one day coverage ranges from 47.5% to 52.0%. The increase in four-day coverage for the combined case ranged from 31.0% to 35.8% for mean coverage and 33.1 % to 39.2% for maximum coverage. We computed meridional distributions of coverages by binning the data into five-degree latitude bands. Our analysis shows a strong seasonal dependence of coverage. In general the meridional analysis indicates that increase in coverages for SeaWiFS/MODIS over SeaWiFS alone are greatest near the solar declination.Document ID19980237904Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWoodward, Robert  H.*(General Sciences Corp. Laurel, MD United States)*Gregg, Watson W.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1998Subject CategoryOceanographyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208607Rept-99B00002NASA/TM-1998-208607Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980237904.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024