alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

August 27, 2003

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not to
be deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, does not
constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, (the "Report")
accompanying this letter and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

I, J. William Holden III, the Chief Financial Officer of Mirant Americas
Generation, LLC (the "Company"), certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ J. William Holden III
-----------------------------------
Name: J. William Holden III,
Sr. Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Henry Lee JACKSON, Jr., Defendant—Appellant.

No. 06-6058.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.

Decided: March 6, 2006.

Henry Lee Jackson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alan Lance Crick, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lee Jackson, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution*799al right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jackson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
§ 30.410 How will the purchase at probate process continue after the decision or reconsideration order is issued? After a decision or reconsideration order is issued: ( a ) If consent is required for the purchase of an interest, and an heir or devisee does not submit written notification that he or she would consider selling the interest by the deadline OHA established, the request to purchase the applicable property interest(s) is denied by operation of law. In such cases, OHA will notify the BIA that it may remove the encumbrance remaining on the applicable property interest(s).
( b ) If the heirs or devisees submit the written notification that they would consider selling the interest by the deadline OHA established, then OHA will notify BIA that it may obtain an appraisal/valuation of the property.
( c ) In any other instances in which a purchase request is denied, BIA may remove any encumbrance remaining on the applicable property interest(s).
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc. (UCI), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
Report of UCI on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to
UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|February 14, 2011 |  | /s/ D. Michael Stout, M.D.           
|                  |  | D. Michael Stout, M.D.               
|                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  | 
|                  |  | /s/ Joseph A. Boyle., CPA            
|                  |  | Joseph A. Boyle., CPA                
|                  |  | Executive Vice President and         
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer              



21
Table 23
                                  U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                        Central Valley Operations Office

                                       Madera Canal and Millerton Lake
                                               2002
Monthly Deliveries in AF

    Water Users     Jan  Feb  Mar   Apr   May   Jun   Jul   Aug   Sep  Oct Nov  Dec   Total

MADERA CANAL

Chowchilla WD          0    0    0     0     0 16584 29774 21755     0    0   0    0   68113
Madera ID              0    0    0  1761 25557 25111 32083 13718 13452    0   0    0  111682
Soquel                 0    0    0     0     0     0     0  8549     0    0   0    0    8549

Total                  0    0    0  1761 25557 41695 61857 44022 13452    0   0    0  188344


MILLERTON LAKE

County of Madera       2    2    3     4     5     6     8     9     7    6   3    2      57
Fresno County # 18     5    5    7    12    18    19     6    24    16   15   8    7     142
Gravelly Ford WD       0    0  584   991  1834   878  1498  1140  1151  741   0    0    8817

Total                  7    7  594  1007  1857   903  1512  1173  1174  762  11    9    9016


*  Data supplied by Fresno Field Division, Contracts Administration Division
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4460 

To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 

regularly review and update policies and manuals related to inspections 

at ports of entry. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2022 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, and Ms. 

HASSAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to regularly review and update policies and 

manuals related to inspections at ports of entry. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Eradicating Narcotic 

5 Drugs and Formulating Effective New Tools to Address 

6 National Yearly Losses of life Act’’ or the ‘‘END 

7 FENTANYL Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4460 IS

1 SEC. 2. ENSURING TIMELY UPDATES TO U.S. CUSTOMS AND 

2 BORDER PROTECTION FIELD MANUALS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not less frequently than tri4 ennially, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 

5 Protection shall review and update, as necessary, the poli6 cies and manuals of the Office of Field Operations related 

7 to inspections at ports of entry to ensure the uniform im8 plementation of inspection practices that will effectively 

9 respond to technological and methodological changes de10 signed to disguise illegal activity, such as the trafficking 

11 of drugs and humans, along the border. 

12 (b) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Shortly after each 

13 update required under subsection (a), the Commissioner 

14 of U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall submit a re15 port to the Committee on Homeland Security and Govern16 mental Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Home17 land Security of the House of Representatives that sum18 marizes the policy and manual changes implemented by 

19 such update. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
### §1616f. Tribal culture and history

#### (a) Program established

The Secretary, acting through the Service, shall establish a program under which appropriate employees of the Service who serve particular Indian tribes shall receive educational instruction in the history and culture of such tribes and in the history of the Service.

#### (b) Tribally controlled institutions

To the extent feasible, the program established under subsection (a) shall—

(1) be carried out through tribally controlled colleges or universities (within the meaning of section 1801(a)(4) of this title) and tribally controlled postsecondary vocational institutions (as defined in section 2397h(2) 1 of title 20),

(2) be developed in consultation with the affected tribal government, and

(3) include instruction in Native American studies.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title I, §113, as added Pub. L. 100–713, title I, §109, Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4796; amended Pub. L. 102–573, title I, §§114(b), 117(b)(5), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4543, 4544; Pub. L. 105–244, title IX, §901(d), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1828; Pub. L. 110–315, title IX, §941(k)(2)(I)(i), Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3467.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2397h of title 20, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), was omitted in the general amendment of chapter 44 (§2301 et seq.) of Title 20, Education, by Pub. L. 105–332, §1(b), Oct. 31, 1998, 112 Stat. 3076.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 110–315 substituted "tribally controlled colleges or universities (within the meaning of section 1801(a)(4) of this title)" for "tribally-controlled community colleges (within the meaning of section 1801(4) of this title)".

1998—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 105–244 made technical amendment to reference in original act which appears in text as reference to section 1801(4) of this title.

1992—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 102–573, §114(b), inserted before comma at end "and tribally controlled postsecondary vocational institutions (as defined in section 2397h(2) of title 20)".

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–573, §117(b)(5), struck out subsec. (c) which authorized appropriations for fiscal years 1990 to 1992.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–244 effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as a note under section 1001 of Title 20, Education.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §48. Right of tribes to direct employment of persons engaged for them

Where any of the tribes are, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Interior, competent to direct the employment of their blacksmiths, mechanics, teachers, farmers, or other persons engaged for them, the direction of such persons may be given to the proper authority of the tribe.

(R.S. §2072.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2072 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 162, §9, 4 Stat. 737.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### Executiv e Orde r 1286 6 an d Congressiona l Review Requirement s Rulemakin g Documen t

Title : \^-t-A { i-^" \'.j>i - ^ ^wU>:.y

j - ^ (^r ^ r y<• -

Wit hrespec t t o th e attache drulemakin g document(s) : 1 . E.O . 12866 : Th e requirement s o f sectio n 6(a)(3)(E ) o f

E.O . 1286 6 hav e bee n me t in accordanc e wit

hth e followin g [initial appropriat e line] :

^ Th e rulemakin g document(s ) wa s no t reviewe db y th e Offic e o f Informatio nan d Regulatory Affair s (OIRA) . N o substantiv e change s wer e mad e t o th e document(s ) after i t wa s submitte dt o OIRA . Th e require dinformatio n i s attached . 2 . Congressiona l Review : Th e requirement s o f th e Smal l Busines s Regulator y Enforcemen t Fairnes s Ac t for th e submissio n o f

fina l rule s t o Congres s andGA O ( § 801 ) hav e bee n me t i n accordanc e withth e followin g [initia l appropriat e line] :

Thi s documen t

i s no t afinal rule . Thi s documen t

i s no t arul e unde r

( § 804) . ^ S Th e documen t

ha s bee n submitte dt o C-5 0 for transmissio n t o Congres s an dGAO . Signatur e Nam e Title/Offic e Dat e
#### Frank Duke v. American Museum of Natural History.

Motion granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Robert G. Barbieri, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lawson Software, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
July 29, 2004

|/s/ ROBERT G. BARBIERIRobert G. Barbieri Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial and Performance Officer |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 5, 2012

y0227 

# Order

March 5, 2012

143806

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143806 COA: 302417 Wayne CC: 06-012922-FC CENACA BRANDON WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 13, 2011 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-4732

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL RAFAEL BERKLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:22-cr-00101-MHL-1)

Submitted: February 10, 2023 Decided: February 28, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Rafael Berkley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United 

States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4732 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Rafael Berkley appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate 

judge’s order directing that Berkley be detained pending resolution of the criminal charges 

against him.*

 We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United 

States v. Clark, 865 F.2d 1433, 1437 (4th Cir. 1989) (citing standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Berkley, No. 3:22-cr-00101-MHL-1 (E.D. Va. 

Dec. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-4732 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 505.82

 505.72

 505.62

 505.38

 504.93

 504.47

 504.00

 503.60

 503.67

 503.17

 502.84

 503.23

 504.06

 503.60

 503.13

 502.67

 502.19

 501.73

 501.19

 501.71

 501.54

 501.32

 501.11

 501.12

 501.11

 501.21

 501.02

 501.07

 500.40

 499.91

 499.99

 61,871

 61,754

 61,636

 61,354

 60,826

 60,294

 59,750

 59,294

 59,374

 58,804

 58,431

 58,872

 59,819

 59,294

 58,758

 58,240

 57,703

 57,192

 56,597

 57,170

 56,983

 56,740

 56,508

 56,519

 56,508

 56,619

 56,409

 56,464

 55,737

 55,207

 55,292

STORAGE

+47

-117

-118

-282

-528

-532

-544

-456

+80

-570

-373

+441

+947

-525

-536

-518

-537

-511

-595

+573

-187

-243

-232

+11

-11

+111

-210

+55

-727

-530

+85

CHANGE

874

794

796

730

596

599

593

624

874

542

612

750

777

38

29

42

26

43

27

1,262

939

906

915

1,035

1,008

1,063

904

951

16

107

421

INFLOW

 837

 842

 838

 861

 853

 861

 861

 848

 828

 821

 792

 520

 293

 295

 291

 286

 290

 293

 320

 966

 1,025

 1,025

 1,025

 1,023

 1,010

 1,002

 1,003

 918

 380

 374

 378

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 13

 11

 17

 11

 9

 6

 6

 6

 6

 8

 8

 8

 7

 8

 8

 11

 7

 8

 7

 7

 8

 4

 7

 6

 4

 5

 7

 5

 3

 0

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/16/2001

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -6,532 18,893 21,959 0 6 221

ACRE-FEET -6,532 37,474 43,556 0 12 438

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 43,556

SPILL 0 43,568

 61,824

OUTLET 12

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 824

 895

 757

 688

 682

 587

 604

 609

 800

 528

 582

 732

 743

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,237

 930

 893

 968

 963

 1,014

 1,023

 901

 917

 0

 0

 0

 17,877

 35,459

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
December 2022

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

1,843

1 736.37 1,857 14 7 0 0

2 736.45 1,861 4 2 0 0

3 736.54 1,865 4 2 0 0

4 733.40 1,723 -142 0 72 0

5 728.62 1,518 -205 -5 98 0

6 727.20 1,460 -58 1 30 0

7 727.32 1,465 5 3 0 0

8 727.68 1,480 15 8 0 0

9 728.02 1,494 14 7 0 0

10 729.71 1,564 70 35 0 0

11 730.18 1,584 20 10 0 0

12 730.45 1,595 11 6 0 0

13 730.63 1,602 7 4 0 0

14 730.79 1,609 7 4 0 0

15 730.93 1,615 6 3 0 0

16 731.05 1,620 5 3 0 0

17 731.17 1,625 5 3 0 0

18 731.28 1,630 5 3 0 0

19 731.37 1,634 4 2 0 0

20 731.48 1,639 5 3 0 0

21 731.59 1,643 4 2 0 0

22 728.70 1,522 -121 -5 56 0

23 728.81 1,526 4 2 0 0

24 728.90 1,530 4 2 0 0

25 728.99 1,534 4 2 0 0

26 729.28 1,546 12 6 0 0

27 732.26 1,672 126 130 66 0

28 730.54 1,599 -73 117 154 0

29 728.41 1,510 -89 157 202 0

30 731.51 1,640 130 200 134 0

31 733.64 1,733 93 47 0 0

TOTALS -110 761 812 0

ACRE-FEET -110 1,509 1,611 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 1,611

Spill 0

Total 1,611

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 3/28/2023
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Penford
Corporation (the "Company") for the three months and six months ended February
28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Steven O. Cordier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: July 10, 2003

/s/ Steven O. Cordier
-----------------------
Steven O. Cordier
Chief Financial Officer