alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1784.0-3 Authority. ( a ) The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 1) requires establishment of a system governing advisory committees in the Executive Branch of the Federal Government and specifies policies, procedures, and responsibilities for committee creation, management and termination.
( b ) The Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701 *et seq.*), as amended by the Public Rangelands Improvement Act of 1978 (43 U.S.C. 1901 *et seq.*), requires establishment of advisory councils representative of major citizen interests concerned with resource management planning or the management of public lands.
( c ) Section 2 of the Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1950 (5 U.S.C. Appendix, as amended; 64 Stat. 1262), authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to make provisions deemed appropriate authorizing the performance by any other officer, or by any agency or employee or the Department of the Interior of any Departmental function. The establishment of advisory committees is deemed an appropriate action.
[45 FR 8177, Feb. 6, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 39529, Oct. 29, 1986]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

p1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147520

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147520

COA: 311319

Kent CC: 11-009155-FC

MIGUEL ANGEL VIDANA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 30.225 Must testimony in a probate proceeding be under oath or affirmation?

Yes. Testimony in a probate proceeding must be under oath or affirmation.
§ 3000.100 Fees in general. ( a ) *Setting fees.* Fees may be statutorily set fees, relatively nominal filing fees, or processing fees intended to reimburse the BLM for its reasonable processing costs. For processing fees, the BLM takes into account the factors in section 304(b) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA) (43 U.S.C. 1734(b)) before deciding a fee. The BLM considers the factors for each type of document when the processing fee is a fixed fee and for each individual document when the fee is decided on a case-by-case basis, as explained in *§ 3000.*110.
( b ) *Conditions for filing.* The BLM will not accept a document that the applicant submits without the proper filing or processing fee amounts except for documents where the BLM sets the fee on a case-by-case basis. Fees are not refundable except as provided for case-by-case fees in *§ 3000.*110. The BLM will keep the fixed filing or processing fee as a service charge even if the BLM does not approve the application or the applicant withdraws it completely or partially.
( c ) *Periodic adjustment.* The BLM will periodically adjust fees established in this subchapter according to changes in the Implicit Price Deflator for Gross Domestic Product, which is published quarterly by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Because the fee recalculations are simply based on a mathematical formula, the BLM will change the fees in final rules without opportunity for notice and comment.
( d ) *Timing of fee applicability.* ( 1 ) For a document that the BLM received before June 22, 2024, the BLM will not charge a fixed fee or a case-by-case fee under this subchapter for processing that document, except for fees applicable under then-existing regulations.
( 2 ) For a document that the BLM receives on or after June 22, 2024, the applicant must include the required fixed fees with the documents filed, as provided in § 3000.120(a) of this chapter, and the applicant is subject to case-by-case processing fees as provided in § 3000.110 and under other provisions of this chapter.
#### § 3105.43 Requirements.

The agreement must disclose the ownership of the lands involved, the parties in interest, the storage fee, rental or royalty offered to be paid for such storage and all information demonstrating such storage would avoid waste and promote the conservation of natural resources.
§ 2562.4 Survey. ( a ) If the land applied for be unsurveyed and no objection to its survey is known to the authorizing officer, he will furnish the applicant with a certificate stating the facts, and, after receiving such certificate, the applicant may make application to the State Director for the survey of the land. Upon receipt of an application, the State Director will, if conditions make such procedure practicable and no objection is shown by his records, furnish the applicant with an estimate of the cost of field and office work, and upon receipt of the deposit required will issue appropriate instructions for the survey of the claim, such survey to be made not later than the next surveying season. The sum so deposited by the applicant for survey will be deemed an appropriation thereof and will be held to be expended in the payment of the cost of the survey, including field and office work, and upon the acceptance of the survey any excess over the cost shall be repaid to the depositor or his legal representative.
( b ) In case it is decided that by reason of the inaccessibility of the locality embraced in an application for the survey, or by reason of other conditions, it will result to the advantage of the Government or claimant to have the survey executed by a deputy surveyor, the State Director will deliver an order to the applicant for such survey, which will be sufficient authority for any deputy surveyor to make a survey of the claim.
( c ) In the latter contingency the survey must be made at the expense of the applicant, and no right will be recognized as initiated by such application unless actual work on the survey is begun and carried to completion without unnecessary delay.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     State Self-Assessment Review and Report. *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0223. *Description:*
                     The information to be collected from states includes statistics on specific criteria. This information is to be provided in the form of a report submitted annually to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services. It is required by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, as a substitute for process audits and will be used to determine if states are complying with specified child support requirements. *Respondents:*
                     State Child Support Enforcement Agencies or the Department/Agency/Bureau responsible for Child Support Enforcement in each state. *Annual Burden Estimates:* Insrument
Number of respondents
Number of responses per respondent
Average burden hours per response
Total burden hoursReport
54
1
3,866
208,764
 *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                     208,764. *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *rsargis@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF, E-mail address: 
                    *katherine_t._astrich@omb.eop.gov.* Dated: January 29, 2004. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 04-2170  Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 828

 848

 883

 866

 884

 861

 852

 876

 868

 855

 848

 867

 886

 878

 834

 815

 806

 720

 642

 703

 612

 608

 637

 681

 737

 802

 840

 853

 871

 904

 902

 806

 816

 842

 843

 852

 821

 814

 842

 843

 822

 831

 846

 868

 798

 805

 788

 689

 526

 605

 592

 552

 577

 603

 632

 683

 745

 802

 824

 841

 848

 863

 817

 830

 861

 854

 867

 844

 826

 859

 854

 838

 840

 857

 877

 842

 819

 805

 722

 594

 625

 665

 584

 594

 621

 655

 706

 773

 822

 844

 859

 873

 875

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 20,703

 21,533

 22,394

 22,625

 22,858

 23,034

 23,178

 23,361

 23,614

 23,840

 24,073

 24,277

 24,450

 24,562

 24,637

 24,698

 24,664

 24,483

 24,336

 24,211

 24,010

 23,809

 23,633

 23,483

 23,395

 23,359

 23,345

 23,356

 23,376

 23,427

 23,485

 690

 718

 746

 754

 762

 768

 773

 779

 787

 795

 802

 809

 815

 819

 821

 823

 822

 816

 811

 807

 800

 794

 788

 783

 780

 779

 778

 779

 779

 781

 783

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 23.1


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated March 20, 2001
included in Newmont Mining Corporation's Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2001, and to
all references to our Firm included in this registration statement.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
-----------------------
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Denver, Colorado,
July 23, 2001
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No . DA 23 - 0500 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. WILLIE VELTKAMP,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 21 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 16 2024

01/16/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0500
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4499 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4499

To prohibit any requirement that a member of the National Guard receive 
                    a vaccination against COVID-19.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2022

Mrs. Blackburn introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit any requirement that a member of the National Guard receive 
                    a vaccination against COVID-19.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITIONS ON REQUIREMENT THAT A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL 
              GUARD RECEIVE A VACCINATION AGAINST COVID-19.

    (a) Prohibition on Funding.--No Federal funds may be used to 
require a member of the National Guard to receive a vaccination against 
COVID-19.
    (b) Prohibition on Adverse Action.--The Secretary of Defense may 
not take any adverse action against a member of the National Guard 
because such member refuses to receive a vaccination against COVID-19.
    (c) Adverse Action Defined.--In this section, the term ``adverse 
action'' includes the following:
            (1) Retaliation.
            (2) Punishment.
            (3) Disparate treatment.
                                 <all>
```
### §1621y. Contract health service administration and disbursement formula

#### (a) Submission of report

As soon as practicable after March 23, 2010, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the Secretary, the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate, and the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives, and make available to each Indian tribe, a report describing the results of the study of the Comptroller General regarding the funding of the contract health service program (including historic funding levels and a recommendation of the funding level needed for the program) and the administration of the contract health service program (including the distribution of funds pursuant to the program), as requested by Congress in March 2009, or pursuant to section 1680t of this title.

#### (b) Consultation with tribes

On receipt of the report under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with Indian tribes regarding the contract health service program, including the distribution of funds pursuant to the program—

(1) to determine whether the current distribution formula would require modification if the contract health service program were funded at the level recommended by the Comptroller General;

(2) to identify any inequities in the current distribution formula under the current funding level or inequitable results for any Indian tribe under the funding level recommended by the Comptroller General;

(3) to identify any areas of program administration that may result in the inefficient or ineffective management of the program; and

(4) to identify any other issues and recommendations to improve the administration of the contract health services program and correct any unfair results or funding disparities identified under paragraph (2).

#### (c) Subsequent action by Secretary

If, after consultation with Indian tribes under subsection (b), the Secretary determines that any issue described in subsection (b)(2) exists, the Secretary may initiate procedures under subchapter III of chapter 5 of title 5 to negotiate or promulgate regulations to establish a disbursement formula for the contract health service program funding.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title II, §226, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 226 of Pub. L. 94–437 is based on section 137 of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.
§ 3264.13 What drilling and operational records must I maintain for each well? You must keep the following information for each well, and make it available for BLM to inspect, upon request: ( a ) A complete and accurate drilling log, in chronological order;
( b ) All other logs;
( c ) Water or steam analyses;
( d ) Hydrologic or heat flow tests;
( e ) Directional surveys;
( f ) A complete log of all subsequent well operations, such as cementing, perforating, acidizing, and well cleanouts; and
( g ) Any other information regarding the well that could affect its status.
§ 30.232 What will the official record of the probate case contain? The official record of the probate case will contain: ( a ) A copy of the posted public notice of hearing showing the posting certifications;
( b ) A copy of each notice served on interested parties with proof of mailing;
( c ) The record of the evidence received at the hearing, including any transcript made of the testimony;
( d ) Claims filed against the estate;
( e ) Any wills, codicils, and revocations;
( f ) Inventories and valuations of the estate;
( g ) Pleadings and briefs filed;
( h ) Interlocutory orders;
( i ) Copies of all proposed or accepted settlement agreements, consolidation agreements, and renunciations and acceptances of renounced property;
( j ) In the case of sale of estate property at probate, copies of notices of sale, appraisals and objections to appraisals, requests for purchases, all bids received, and proof of payment;
( k ) The decision, order, and the notices thereof; and
( l ) Any other documents or items deemed material by the judge.
#### Elizabeth Wahl, Respondent, v. Charles G. Cronin and Others, Appellants.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The verdict of the jury as to the condition of the stairway, and prior notice thereof to the janitor of the building, is supported by testimony the credibility of which was for the jury. In view of plaintiff’s injuries and the reduction of the verdict directed by the trial justice, it cannot be held that the judgment is excessive or unreasonable. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 626

 632

 659

 681

 686

 715

 699

 725

 708

 712

 675

 675

 675

 629

 630

 604

 554

 550

 513

 526

 528

 544

 384

 353

 357

 383

 361

 355

 337

 350

 581

 581

 612

 655

 653

 685

 672

 678

 685

 686

 641

 653

 634

 608

 579

 545

 533

 511

 495

 490

 512

 367

 337

 337

 333

 359

 353

 322

 320

 339

 609

 616

 635

 668

 671

 699

 687

 706

 699

 702

 658

 661

 642

 619

 602

 569

 543

 531

 504

 512

 523

 469

 354

 344

 349

 372

 357

 335

 326

 345

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 5, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 2710.0-1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part implement the sale authority of section 203 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1701, 1713).
### SUBCHAPTER LXIII—TLINGIT AND HAIDA INDIANS OF ALASKA
#### Harry Weil, by Carl Weil, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. F. I. A. T., Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The evidence both as to negligence and the extent and gravity of plaintiff’s injuries was conflicting, and, therefore, the jury were to determine the credibility and weight to be given to this testimony. As there was evidence to sustain their verdict, and appellant’s exceptions to the rulings of the court below present no error, we find no ground to interfere with the verdict and the judgment entered thereon. Present — Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 502

 478

 476

 466

 455

 451

 457

 458

 449

 459

 466

 467

 498

 506

 515

 516

 527

 548

 557

 567

 554

 567

 560

 571

 574

 565

 565

 600

 579

 567

 562

 453

 448

 442

 437

 431

 428

 427

 423

 423

 432

 443

 452

 458

 473

 475

 482

 489

 495

 497

 499

 500

 503

 508

 510

 518

 530

 532

 532

 539

 540

 539

 464

 457

 451

 448

 440

 436

 436

 436

 433

 443

 450

 458

 477

 482

 485

 493

 499

 507

 510

 514

 514

 519

 522

 527

 537

 542

 542

 549

 553

 548

 545

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 5, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### Frances Holmes, Plaintiff, v. City of New York, Appellant. Sylvester Holmes et al., Respondents.

,No opinion. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. [180 Misc. 364.]
### §5491. Suspension of SEED assistance

The President should suspend all assistance to an East European country pursuant to this chapter if the President determines, and reports to the Congress, that—

(1) that country is engaged in international activities directly and fundamentally contrary to United States national security interests;

(2) the president or any other government official of that country initiates martial law or a state of emergency for reasons other than to respond to a natural disaster or a foreign invasion; or

(3) any member who was elected to that country's parliament has been removed from that office or arrested through extraconstitutional processes.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title VIII, §801, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1322.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–179, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1298, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5401 of this title and Tables.
#### § 3170.9 Enforcement.

Noncompliance with any of the requirements of this part or any order issued under this part may result in enforcement actions under 43 CFR subpart 3163 or any other remedy available under applicable law or regulation.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Larry Campbell, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-196;

Second District

July 1, 1974.

Ralph Ruebner and Adam Lutynski, both of the State Appellate Defenders Office, of Elgin, for appellant.

William J. Cowlin, State’s Attorney, of Woodstock (James K. Kilduff, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.