alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 706.48

 706.45

 706.40

 706.38

 706.31

 706.24

 706.16

 706.08

 705.99

 705.90

 705.82

 705.73

 705.65

 705.60

 705.53

 705.47

 705.41

 705.48

 705.74

 705.88

 705.92

 705.95

 706.01

 706.02

 706.03

 706.05

 706.14

 706.18

 706.19

 706.20

 763

 762

 761

 760

 758

 756

 754

 752

 750

 747

 745

 743

 741

 740

 738

 736

 735

 736

 743

 747

 748

 749

 750

 751

 751

 751

 754

 755

 755

 755

STORAGE

+1

-1

-1

-1

-2

-2

-2

-2

-2

-3

-2

-2

-2

-1

-2

-2

-1

+1

+7

+4

+1

+1

+1

+1

+0

+0

+3

+1

+0

+0

CHANGE

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

-1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

5

3

2

2

2

2

1

1

3

2

1

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0950

 1020

 1100

 0950

TIME

 .28

 .33

 .42

 .37

COPPER

 .79

 .96

 1.24

 1.14

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 31, 2007

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -7 28 0 30

ACRE-FEET -7 56 0 60

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 60

 60

 762

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

Table 7
§ 418.3230 When will we use your subsidy inquiry as your filing date? If you or your personal representative (as defined in 42 CFR 423.772) make an oral or written inquiry about the subsidy, or partially complete an Internet subsidy application on our Web site, we will use the date of the inquiry or the date the partial Internet application was started as your filing date if the following requirements are met: ( a ) The written or oral inquiry indicates your intent to file for the subsidy, or you submit a partially completed Internet application to us;
( b ) The inquiry, whether in person, by telephone, or in writing, is directed to an office or an official described in § 418.3220, or a partially completed Internet subsidy application is received by us;
( c ) You or your personal representative (as defined in 42 CFR 423.772) file an application (as defined in § 418.3210) within 60 days after the date of the notice we will send in response to the inquiry. The notice will say that we will make an initial determination of your eligibility for a subsidy, if an application is filed within 60 days after the date of the notice. We will send the notice to you. Where you are a minor or adjudged legally incompetent and your personal representative made the inquiry, we will send the notice to your personal representative; and
( d ) You are alive on the first day of the month in which the application is filed.
Exhibit 10.1


 


FOMO ADVISORS
LLC


Public Merchant
Bank 


100% Owned Subsidiary
of FOMO CORP.





	
	
	



 


	Mission:
    	To
    provide merchant banking services to private companies using FOMO securities in a “pass through” transaction. 
	 	 
	Structure:
    	Target
    private companies engage FOMO Advisors with equity/warrants for access to network; 
	 	Investors
    with an appetite for private co. investments fund FOMO; 
	 	FOMO
    invests the funds in private co. keeping an admin fee of TBD%; 
	 	Private
    co. issues securities and other rights to FOMO which holds them in portfolio; 
	 	Private
    co. issues warrants to FOMO which assigns some/all to private investor; 
	 	FOMO
    reserves right to spin-out IPO or spin-off its position and new private co. shares to its shareholders in an “IPO” or
    other; 
	 	FOMO
    obtains rights of participation in future financings of private co.; 
	 	NCNDA
    with private investors prevents direct investment in private co. w/o FOMO CORP. approval; 
	 	Based
    on capital availability, FOMO ADVISORS may direct invest in the target 100% or as a participant. 
	 	 
	>>
    FOMO must be compensated for its network and this hybrid public/private merchant banking model. 
	>>
    FOMO will bring its thousands of shareholders and combined 100 years investment banking experience to bear.
### SUBCHAPTER VII—NATIONAL FUND FOR EXCELLENCE IN AMERICAN INDIAN EDUCATION

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter is comprised of title VIII, formerly title V, of Pub. L. 93–638, which was formerly classified to part F (§458bbb et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 14 of this title prior to redesignation by Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §231(d)(1), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2278, transfer to former part H (§458ddd et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 14 of this title, and editorial reclassification as this subchapter.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 449 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 449

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
certain federally subsidized loan repayments for dental school faculty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2021

Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Wicker) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 
certain federally subsidized loan repayments for dental school faculty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dental Loan Repayment Assistance 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN FEDERALLY SUBSIDIZED LOAN REPAYMENTS FOR 
              DENTAL SCHOOL FACULTY.

    (a) In General.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by inserting ``, under a loan repayment program 
receiving a grant or contract under section 748(a)(2) of such Act'' 
after ``section 338I of such Act''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 108(f)(4) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``National health service 
corps loan repayment program and certain state loan repayment 
programs'' in the heading thereof and inserting ``certain federal and 
state loan repayment programs''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (d) GAO Report.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall 
review and report to the appropriate committees of Congress on the 
participation of dental providers and faculty in areas and schools 
receiving funding from the Dental Faculty Development and Loan 
Repayment Program under section 748(a)(2) of the Public Health Service 
Act (42 U.S.C. 293k-2(a)(2)), including the extent to which they remain 
full-time faculty teaching and practicing in dental clinics located in 
dental schools, hospitals, or community-based affiliated sites after 
receiving funding from the program.
                                 <all>
```
§ 663.710 What conditions govern OJT payments to employers? ( a ) On-the-job training payments to employers are deemed to be compensation for the extraordinary costs associated with training participants and the costs associated with the lower productivity of the participants.
( b ) Employers may be reimbursed up to 50 percent of the wage rate of an OJT participant for the extraordinary costs of providing the training and additional supervision related to the OJT. (WIA sec. 101(31)(B).)
( c ) Employers are not required to document such extraordinary costs.
§ 2932.14 Do I need a Special Recreation Permit to hunt, trap, or fish? ( a ) If you hold a valid State license, you do not need a Special Recreation Permit to hunt, trap, or fish. You must comply with State license requirements for these activities. BLM Special Recreation Permits do not alone authorize you to hunt, trap, or fish. However, you must have a Special Recreation Permit if BLM requires one for recreational use of a special area where you wish to hunt, trap, or fish.
( b ) Outfitters and guides providing services to hunters, trappers, or anglers must obtain Special Recreation Permits from BLM. Competitive event operators and organized groups may also need a Special Recreation Permit for these activities.
### §130. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–317, §2(5), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4419

Section, R.S. §2087, withheld annuities, money, and goods from Indians based on being under the influence of or having access to intoxicating liquor.
§ 2920.2-2 Minimum impact permits. ( a ) The authorized officer may, without publication of a notice of realty action, issue a permit for a land use upon a determination that the proposed use is in conformance with Bureau of Land Management plans, policies and programs, local zoning ordinances and any other requirements and will not cause appreciable damage or disturbance to the public lands, their resources or improvements.
( b ) Permit decisions made under paragraph (a) of this section take effect immediately upon execution, and remain in effect during the period of time specified in the decision to issue the permit. Any person whose interest is adversely affected by a decision to grant or deny a permit under paragraph (a) of this section may appeal to the Board of Land Appeals under part 4 of this title. However, decisions and permits issued under paragraph (a) of this section will remain in effect until stayed.
[46 FR 5777, Jan. 19, 1981, as amended at 61 FR 32354, June 24, 1996]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 254

 257

 385

 440

 440

 473

 496

 549

 547

 554

 562

 546

 558

 582

 587

 587

 591

 596

 597

 588

 554

 563

 590

 600

 615

 619

 651

 658

 658

 668

 242

 242

 258

 390

 415

 444

 452

 498

 534

 538

 548

 533

 539

 558

 561

 570

 577

 573

 583

 545

 512

 523

 562

 576

 591

 603

 599

 639

 636

 642

 248

 251

 315

 423

 426

 464

 464

 528

 539

 545

 555

 541

 546

 568

 575

 580

 585

 585

 591

 573

 530

 541

 576

 592

 606

 611

 624

 647

 647

 653

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 7,022

 7,024

 7,103

 7,298

 7,496

 7,738

 7,986

 8,299

 8,620

 8,953

 9,307

 9,648

 10,006

 10,369

 10,734

 11,086

 11,443

 11,783

 12,117

 12,429

 12,702

 12,982

 13,307

 13,648

 14,015

 14,376

 14,736

 15,127

 15,529

 15,929

 234

 234

 237

 243

 250

 258

 266

 277

 287

 298

 310

 322

 334

 346

 358

 370

 381

 393

 404

 414

 423

 433

 444

 455

 467

 479

 491

 504

 518

 531

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 901.30 Authority to suspend or terminate enrollment. Under section 3042(b) of ERISA the Joint Board may, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, suspend or terminate the enrollment of an enrolled actuary if the Joint Board finds that such enrolled actuary ( a ) Has failed to discharge his/her duties under ERISA, or
( b ) Does not satisfy the requirements for enrollment in effect at the time of his/her enrollment.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 136

 136

 140

 132

 144

 135

 146

 135

 147

 140

 146

 151

 144

 145

 150

 152

 145

 150

 158

 152

 158

 163

 170

 168

 168

 173

 177

 173

 175

 170

 175

 118

 116

 118

 111

 119

 117

 122

 123

 120

 121

 121

 118

 117

 118

 126

 130

 133

 135

 137

 145

 148

 145

 146

 156

 160

 161

 164

 165

 156

 158

 167

 125

 123

 125

 118

 125

 126

 127

 129

 131

 129

 131

 132

 130

 129

 133

 135

 138

 141

 145

 149

 151

 153

 153

 159

 162

 164

 167

 168

 163

 164

 170

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 19, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Norman Richmond, Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
§ 2091.4-2 Segregation and opening: Airport leases and grants. ( a ) The issuance of a lease for airport purposes under the authority of the Act of May 24, 1928 or a patent or document of conveyance for airport and airway purposes under the authority of the Act of September 3, 1982, as amended (49 U.S.C. 2215), continues to segregate the lands. (See part 2640 and subpart 2911)
( b ) If an airport lease is terminated, the lands are opened by publication in the Federal Register of an opening order which specifies the date and time of opening.
( c ) The lands covered by an airport lease or grant remain open to the operation of the mineral leasing laws, the material disposal laws and the Geothermal Steam Act, but are segregated from the operation of the mining laws pending the issuance of such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe (See part 2640 and subpart 2911).
Panel Members for the Meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and 

Rodenticide Act Scientific Advisory Panel

Draft Product Performance Data Needs Assessment for Pesticide Products 

Claiming Efficacy Against Invertebrate Pests

March 19 – 21, 2013

EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0574 OPP Docket Tel: 703-305-5805

FIFRA SAP Chair

Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D.

Professor of Aquatic Ecotoxicology & Environmental Toxicology 

Department of Environmental Sciences 

University of California, Riverside 

Riverside, CA

Designated Federal Official

Joseph E. Bailey 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Science Coordination & Policy 

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel

EPA East Building, (7201M) 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue

NW Washington, DC 20460 

Tel: 202-564-8450; Fax: 202-564-8382; Email: bailey.joseph@epa.gov

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Members

K. Barry Delclos, Ph.D.

Pharmacologist

Division of Biochemical Toxicology

National Center for Toxicological Research

U.S. Food & Drug Administration

Jefferson, AR

Marion Ehrich, Ph.D., DABT., ATS

Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology 

Department of Biomedical Science and Pathobiology 

Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine 

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 

Blacksburg, VA
James McManaman, Ph.D.

Professor and Chief 

Section of Basic Reproductive Sciences 

Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology& Physiology and Biophysics 

University of Colorado-Denver 

Aurora, CO

Martha Sandy, Ph.D.

Senior Toxicologist and Chief

Cancer Toxicology and Epidemiology Section

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

California Environmental Protection Agency

Oakland, CA 

FQPA Science Review Board Members

Charles Smith Apperson, Ph.D. 

William Neal Reynolds Professor Emeritus

Department of Entomology

North Carolina State University

Raleigh, NC 

Awinash P. Bhatkar, Ph.D., BCE 

State Plant Regulatory Office and Coordinator for Biosecurity & Agriculture Resource 

Management

Texas Department of Agriculture

Austin, Texas 

Naresh Duggal, M.Sc., BCE

Integrated Pest Management Manager

County of Santa Clara, California

San Jose, CA 

Kendra L. Lawrence, Ph.D., BCE 

Senior Technical Consultant

US Army Medical Materiel Development Activity

General Dynamics Information Technology

Fort Detrick, MD

Timothy J. Lysyk, Ph.D. 

Medical-Veterinary Entomology

Lethbridge Research Centre

Government of Canada

Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada 
Janet McAllister, Ph.D., BCME 

Entomologist

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Division of Vector-Borne Diseases

Arboviral Disease Branch

Fort Collins, CO 

Weste L. A. Osbrink, Ph.D.

Research Entomologist

US Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service

Knipling-Bushland U.S. Livestock Insects Research Laboratory

Kerrville, TX

Gale E. Ridge, Ph.D. 

Assistant Scientist

Department of Entomology

Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station

New Haven, CT 

Peter Hans Smits, Ph.D.

Scientific Assessor - Efficacy of Biocides

Ctgb - Board for the Authorization of Plant Protection Products and Biocides 

Wageningen, Netherlands
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 172

 159

 130

 129

 122

 118

 132

 139

 140

 157

 144

 138

 156

 160

 175

 178

 173

 187

 176

 150

 146

 151

 150

 157

 161

 171

 176

 148

 146

 181

 160

 141

 113

 101

 98

 95

 93

 103

 119

 108

 103

 105

 108

 119

 120

 124

 130

 130

 129

 128

 129

 129

 134

 131

 128

 128

 126

 135

 125

 121

 124

 126

 150

 140

 114

 112

 110

 104

 118

 129

 126

 127

 123

 124

 132

 134

 139

 142

 142

 147

 144

 140

 136

 138

 139

 140

 138

 144

 145

 137

 133

 141

 139

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
§ 3120.31 Expression of interest process. ( a ) A party submitting an expression of interest in leasing land available for disposition under section 17 of the Mineral Leasing Act must include the submitter's name and address and must submit the expression of interest through the BLM's online leasing system.
( b ) The expression must provide a description of the lands identified by legal land description, as follows: ( 1 ) For lands surveyed under the public land survey system, describe the lands to the nearest aliquot part within the legal subdivision, section, township, range, and meridian;
( 2 ) For unsurveyed lands, describe the lands by metes and bounds, giving courses and distances, and tie this information to an official corner of the public land surveys, or to a prominent topographic feature;
( 3 ) For approved protracted surveys, include an entire section, township, range, and meridian. Do not divide protracted sections into aliquot parts;
( 4 ) For lands that have water boundaries, describe the lands based on the initial survey or deed acquiring ownership;
( 5 ) For fractional interest lands, identify the United States mineral ownership by percentage;
( 6 ) For split estate lands, where the surface rights are in private ownership and the rights to develop the oil and gas are managed by the Federal Government, submit the private surface owner's name and address.
( 7 ) For lands where the acquiring agency has assigned an acquisition or tract number covering the lands applied, submit the number in addition to any description otherwise required by this section. If the authorized officer determines that the acquisition or tract number, together with identification of the State and county, constitutes an adequate description, the authorized officer may allow the description in this manner in lieu of other descriptions required by this section.
( c ) A submitter may submit more than one expression of interest, so long as each expression separately satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) Each expression of interest must include a filing fee, as found in the fee schedule in § 3103.1 of this chapter.
( e ) The BLM may offer for sale all or some of the lands specified in an expression of interest and may offer those lands as part of a parcel that includes lands not specified in the expression of interest.
### **CHAPTER 3—AGREEMENTS WITH INDIANS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—TREATIES

Sec.
71.
Future treaties with Indian tribes.
72.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CONTRACTS WITH INDIANS

81.
Contracts and agreements with Indian tribes.
81a.
Counsel for prosecution of claims against the United States; cancellation; revival.
81b.
Continuation of contracts with attorneys containing limitation of time where suits have been filed.
82.
Payments under contracts; aiding in making prohibited contracts.
82a.
Contracts for payment of money permitted certain tribes; payment for legal services.
83, 84.
Repealed.
85.
Contracts relating to tribal funds or property.
86.
Encumbrances on lands allotted to applicants for enrollment in Five Civilized Tribes; use of interest on tribal funds.
87, 87a.
Repealed.
88.
False vouchers, accounts, or claims.
### §§881, 882. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 881, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §431, 60 Stat. 1004; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §4, 74 Stat. 831; Aug. 17, 1977, Pub. L. 95–105, title IV, §401, 91 Stat. 852, related to eligibility period, etc., for receipt of salary by chiefs of missions.

Section 882, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §432, 60 Stat. 1005; Apr. 5, 1955, ch. 23, §13(1), 69 Stat. 27, related to eligibility period, etc., for receipt of salary by officers and employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

National Collegiate :

Student Loantrust 2006

- 1 :

:

v. : No. 1340 C.D. 2016

:

David Becirovic, :

Appellant :

O R D E R

NOW, November 13, 2017

, having considered appellant’s application

for re consideration , the application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

P resident Judge