alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1323. Retrocession of jurisdiction by State

#### (a) Acceptance by United States

The United States is authorized to accept a retrocession by any State of all or any measure of the criminal or civil jurisdiction, or both, acquired by such State pursuant to the provisions of section 1162 of title 18, section 1360 of title 28, or section 7 of the Act of August 15, 1953 (67 Stat. 588), as it was in effect prior to its repeal by subsection (b) of this section.

#### (b) Repeal of statutory provisions

Section 7 of the Act of August 15, 1953 (67 Stat. 588), is hereby repealed, but such repeal shall not affect any cession of jurisdiction made pursuant to such section prior to its repeal.

(Pub. L. 90–284, title IV, §403, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 79.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 7 of the Act of August 15, 1953, referred to in text, is section 7 of act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 505, 67 Stat. 588, which is set out as a note under section 1360 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 11435. Designating Secretary of the Interior To Accept Retrocession of Jurisdiction by State

Ex. Ord. No. 11435, Nov. 21, 1968, 33 F.R. 17339, provided:

By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 465 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 9) and as President of the United States, the Secretary of the Interior is hereby designated and empowered to exercise, without the approval, ratification, or other action of the President or of any other officer of the United States, any and all authority conferred upon the United States by Section 403(a) of the Act of April 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 79 (25 U.S.C. 1323(a)): Provided, That acceptance of retrocession of all or any measure of civil or criminal jurisdiction, or both, by the Secretary hereunder shall be effected by publication in the Federal Register of a notice which shall specify the jurisdiction retroceded and the effective date of the retrocession: Provided further, That acceptance of such retrocession of criminal jurisdiction shall be effected only after consultation by the Secretary with the Attorney General.

Lyndon B. Johnson.
378 P.2d 137

#### Gene MALLEY, Petitioner, v. Harold A. COX, Warden, Penitentiary of New Mexico, Respondent.

No. 22 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 7, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Order that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus be and the same is hereby denied for failure of petitioner to exhaust District Court remedy.
§ 2450.6 Effect of final order. ( a ) A final order of the Secretary shall continue in full force and effect so long as the lands remain subject to classification under the authorities cited in subpart 2400 until an authorized officer revokes or modifies it. Until it is so revoked or modified, all applications and petition-applications for the lands not consistent with the classification of the lands will not be allowed. Any payments submitted therewith will be returned. If the order is revoked or modified, the land will be opened to entry on an equal-opportunity basis after public notice in accordance with applicable regulations for the purpose for which it may be classified.
( b ) Nothing in this section, however, shall prevent the Secretary of the Interior, personally and not through a delegate, from vacating or modifying a final order of the Secretary. In the event that the Secretary vacates or modifies a final order within sixty days of the date it became final, any preference right of a petitioner-applicant will be restored.
### §17. Use of Bureau facilities

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of the Interior may permit tribal governments and organizations and student organizations to use Bureau of Indian Affairs equipment, land, buildings, and other structures if such use does not interfere with the purpose for which they are administered by the Bureau and when such use benefits Indians or Federal or federally funded programs. The Secretary may charge the user for the cost of the utilities and other expenses incurred for the use. The amounts collected shall be credited to the appropriation or fund from which the expenses are paid and shall be available until the end of the fiscal year following the fiscal year in which collected. The Secretary's decision to not permit a use under this section is final and shall not be subject to judicial review.

#### (b) Scope of authority

The authority provided by this section is in addition to, and not in derogation of, any other authority available to the Secretary of the Interior.

#### (c) Limitation of liability

The payment of any fee, or agreement to pay costs, to the Secretary shall not in any way or to any extent limit the right of the United States to rely upon sovereign immunity or any State or Federal statute limiting liability or damages from injuries sustained in connection with use under this section.

(Pub. L. 100–297, title V, §5405, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 417; Pub. L. 100–427, §25, Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1613.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1988—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–427, §25(a), amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: "The Secretary of the Interior may permit tribal, student, and other non-Federal organizations to use facilities, lands, and equipment administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs if such use does not interfere with the purpose for which the facilities, land, and equipment are administered by the Bureau. The Secretary of the Interior may charge the user for the actual or estimated additional cost of utilities or other expenses incurred because of the use and the amounts collected shall be credited to the appropriation or fund from which the expenses are paid."

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–427, §25(b), added subsec. (c).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

For effective date and applicability of section, see section 6303 of Pub. L. 100–297, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 1071 of Title 20, Education.
#### Helen M. Horton, as Administratrix of the Estate of Louis Horton, Deceased, Appellant, v. New York Life Insurance Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [189 Misc. 395.] [See *post,*p. 877.]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL J. WOLFE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-3932

December 6, 2023

Appeal from the County Court for Pasco County; Dustin T. Anderson, 

Judge.

Michael J. Wolfe, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Jessica L. Rodriguez, 

Assistant County Attorney, New Port Richey, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, VILLANTI, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 390.58

 389.73

 389.43

 388.63

 387.71

 386.99

 386.66

 386.17

 385.65

 385.48

 385.10

 384.50

 384.31

 384.48

 384.54

 384.33

 384.62

 384.59

 384.24

 383.43

 382.72

 382.06

 381.64

 381.59

 381.55

 381.34

 380.98

 380.70

 380.67

 380.63

 380.98

 450,030

 443,655

 441,413

 435,454

 428,639

 423,333

 420,909

 417,320

 413,523

 412,284

 409,521

 405,171

 403,797

 405,026

 405,460

 403,942

 406,040

 405,822

 403,291

 397,456

 392,367

 387,658

 384,672

 384,317

 384,033

 382,544

 379,996

 378,019

 377,807

 377,525

 379,996

STORAGE

-6,484

-6,375

-2,242

-5,959

-6,815

-5,306

-2,424

-3,589

-3,797

-1,239

-2,763

-4,350

-1,374

+1,229

+434

-1,518

+2,098

-218

-2,531

-5,835

-5,089

-4,709

-2,986

-355

-284

-1,489

-2,548

-1,977

-212

-282

+2,471

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

596

1,981

1,605

596

1,577

458

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,633

PUMPING

 3,196

 3,186

 993

 2,915

 3,449

 2,649

 1,095

 1,794

 1,797

 544

 1,325

 1,316

 1,190

 1,200

 1,200

 1,200

 0

 1,217

 1,217

 2,911

 2,563

 2,352

 1,286

 0

 0

 714

 1,173

 947

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 59

 57

 55

 52

 61

 58

 45

 14

 16

 18

 16

 12

 12

 14

 19

 18

 17

 14

 16

 16

 17

 18

 23

 12

 18

 19

 17

 18

 20

 18

 51

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-14

+29

-82

-37

+75

+32

-82

-2

-101

-63

-52

-866

-87

-148

-168

-144

-502

+663

-44

-15

+14

-4

-197

-167

-125

-18

-94

-32

-87

-124

-336

OR

 166

 203

 229

 36

 72

 95

 107

 146

 168

 141

 99

 122

 119

 105

 110

 133

 141

 134

 133

 84

 116

 133

 106

 127

 99

 103

 80

 92

 115

 137

 128

C.F.S.

 .68

 .84

 .95

 .15

 .30

 .40

 .45

 .62

 .71

 .60

 .42

 .52

 .51

 .45

 .47

 .57

 .60

 .57

 .57

 .36

 .50

 .58

 .46

 .55

 .43

 .45

 .35

 .40

 .50

 .60

 .56

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR September 29, 2014

DAILY OPERATIONS

AUGUST 2014 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -76,518 8,446 43,429 820 0 -2,778 3,779 16.12 .00

ACRE-FEET -76,518 16,753 86,141 1,626 0 -5,510 7,496

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 86,141

PACHECO TUNNEL 1,626 TOTAL 87,767

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = .00

 456,514

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
11-1 11.0 Comprehensive Periodic Implementation Plan Revisions

40 CFR Section 51.308(f) r equires states to revise their regional haze implementation plan and submit a plan revi sion to the EPA by July 31, 2018 and every ten years thereafter. In accordanc e with the requirements listed in Section 51.308(f) of the federal rule for regional haze, New York commits to revising and submitting this regional haze implementat ion plan by July 31, 2018 and every ten years thereafter as required.

In addition, 40 CFR Section 51.308(g) r equires periodic reports on progress being made toward the reasonable progress goals established for each mandatory Class I area. These reports will be based on reasonable progress
evaluations from states with Class I areas to which New York sources are contributory.

In accordance with the requirements listed in Section 51.308(g) of the federal rule for regional haze, New York commits to submitting this report to the EPA every five years following the initial submitta l of this SIP. This report will be in the
form of a SIP revision.

All requirements listed in Se ction 40 CFR 51.308(g) that apply to states that do
not contain a Class I area shall be addresse d in the SIP revision for reasonable progress. The requirement s listed in Section 51.308( g) include the following:

$ A description of the implementation status;
$ Summary of emission reductions achieved thus far;

$ Class I state assessments of changes in visibility conditions at each Class I area affected by sources in New York (current vs. baseline) based on five year averages of annual values for 20 percent best and worst days;
$ An analysis of emission changes over the five-year period;
$ Analysis of any significant ant hropogenic emissions changes that have impeded progress within New York State;

$ An assessment of the sufficiency of this implementation plan to meet RPGs;

New York commits to continue consulting with the FLMs on the implementation of Section 51.308 and this SIP, incl uding development and review of SIP revisions and five-year progress repor ts, and on the implem entation of other programs affecting the impairment of visibi lity in Class I areas. Finally, New York commits to meet the requi red periodic updates of t he emission inventory as required under 51.308(d)(4)(v).
Exhibit 24.4

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Douglas K. Cooper, David J. Prystash, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of
them, with full power to act without the others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other
documents in connection with the Form 10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 12th day of
February, 2010.



/s/ John W. SheridanSignaturePrintName:

John W. Sheridan
#### § 1825.12 When does relinquished land become available again for other application or appropriation?

Relinquished land may not again become available until BLM notes the filed relinquishment of an interest on the land records maintained by the BLM office having jurisdiction over the lands involved. If you have any questions regarding the availability of a particular tract of land, you should contact the BLM office having jurisdiction over the lands or records.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 189 (Thursday, September 30, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58257-58258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. 2003-NE-57-AD; Amendment 39-13798; AD 2004-19-04]
RIN 2120-AA64


Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc RB211-22B, RB211-524, 
and RB211-535 Series Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 58258]]

SUMMARY: This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive 
(AD) 2004-19-04. That AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211-22B, 
RB211-524, and RB211-535 series turbofan engines. That AD was published 
in the Federal Register on September 22, 2004 (69 FR 56683). In the 
amendatory language, under Sec.  39.13 [Amended], the amendment number 
for the AD was inadvertently omitted. This document corrects that 
omission. In all other respects, the original document remains the 
same.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Effective September 30, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Spinney, Aerospace 
Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller 
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; 
telephone (781) 238-7175, fax (781) 238-7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A final rule AD, FR Doc. 04-21173 that 
applies to RR RB211-22B, RB211-524, and RB211-535 series turbofan 
engines, was published in the Federal Register on September 22, 2004 
(69 FR 56683). The following correction is needed:


Sec.  39.13  [Corrected]

0
On page 56684, in the second column, under Sec.  39.13 [Amended], in 
the fifth line, ``2004-19-04 Rolls-Royce plc: Docket No.'' is corrected 
to read ``2004-19-04 Rolls-Royce plc: Amendment 39-13798. Docket No.''.

    Issued in Burlington, MA, on September 23, 2004.
Francis A. Favara,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 04-21912 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 272

 251

 233

 220

 202

 191

 180

 172

 175

 169

 172

 173

 179

 175

 192

 179

 186

 193

 199

 209

 220

 224

 225

 226

 233

 239

 254

 253

 264

 280

 296

 242

 233

 220

 202

 187

 167

 164

 159

 160

 159

 159

 155

 168

 166

 166

 168

 170

 175

 184

 194

 198

 208

 210

 210

 222

 226

 233

 244

 251

 264

 274

 254

 239

 228

 207

 192

 180

 174

 165

 165

 165

 167

 168

 172

 172

 175

 175

 178

 184

 191

 201

 209

 215

 218

 221

 226

 233

 240

 248

 256

 268

 282

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 25, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 718.72

 733.47

 729.83

 724.88

 718.50

 712.81

 712.72

 713.30

 715.04

 718.59

 717.76

 715.91

 714.09

 711.51

 711.62

 713.18

 713.23

 712.94

 712.44

 711.71

 710.63

 710.44

 712.37

 713.93

 715.20

 716.36

 717.98

 717.26

 716.40

 715.64

 714.73

 1,140

 1,726

 1,569

 1,368

 1,133

 945

 943

 961

 1,016

 1,136

 1,107

 1,045

 986

 906

 910

 957

 958

 949

 934

 912

 880

 874

 932

 981

 1,022

 1,060

 1,114

 1,090

 1,061

 1,036

 1,006

STORAGE

+99

+586

-157

-201

-235

-188

-2

+18

+55

+120

-29

-62

-59

-80

+4

+47

+1

-9

-15

-22

-32

-6

+58

+49

+41

+38

+54

-24

-29

-25

-30

CHANGE

100

378

51

29

9

-4

34

62

105

115

70

51

45

35

45

44

31

25

22

19

14

17

29

25

21

19

27

17

14

16

14

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 50

 83

 130

 130

 127

 91

 35

 53

 77

 55

 85

 82

 75

 75

 43

 20

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 20

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 29

 29

 29

 29

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 12, 2004

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -35 1,479 0 1,497

ACRE-FEET -35 2,934 0 2,969

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,969

 2,969

 1,041

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 7 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk March 7 , 2018

15 3 829 ( 53 )

DAVID J. MC QUEER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 153829

v COA: 325619

Grand Traverse CC: 2014

- 030287

- NO

PERFECT FENCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice

, the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental bri ef submitted on

February 2 8 , 2018, is accepted for filing.
# C_2012242EN.01000801.xml

| 11.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/8

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2012 under certain quotas opened by the Union for pigmeat products

2012/C 242/07

Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The import licence applications lodged during the first seven days of June 2012 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2012 do not, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2012; they are set out in the Annex to this communication.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2012
  (kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4038 | 8 338 458 |
| 09.4170 | 1 180 500 |
| 09.4204 | 1 156 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2012

(kg)

09.4038

8 338 458

09.4170

1 180 500

09.4204

1 156 000

---