m

46th NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1961

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION 239
SELECTED WEIGHTS AND MEASURES

PUBLICATIONS OF THE

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

NBS Handbook 44-2d Edition—1955 Specifications, Tolerances, and Regulations for Commercial Weighing and

Measuring Devices:

Loose Leaf (does not include binder) $1. 00

NBS Handbook 67 Checking Prepackaged Commodities . 35

NBS Circular 501 Federal and State Weights and Measures

Laws 6. 50

NBS Circular 540 Weights and Measures Case Reference

Book . l.2£

NBS Circular 547 Precision Laboratory Standards of Mass

and Laboratory Weights

NBS Circular 593 The Federal Basis for Weights and Measures '. . 3C

NBS Monograph 15 Calibration of Line Standards of Length

and Measuring Tapes at the National Bureau of Standards

NBS Miscellaneous Publication 233 Units of Weight and

Measure—Definitions and Tables of Equivalents . 4(

AVAILABLE REPORTS OF THE

NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASUR

1947 Miscellaneous Publication 189 40(£

1953 Miscellaneous Publication 209 40f£

1954 Miscellaneous Publication 212 50ff

1955 Miscellaneous Publicahon 216 70^

1956 Miscellaneous Publication 219 70£

1957 Miscellaneous Publication 222 55ff

1958 Miscellaneous Publication 225 65f$

1959 Miscellaneous Publication 228 65ff

1960 Miscellaneous Publication 235 75j£

Index to the Reports of the National

Conference on Weights and Measures

from the First to the Thirty-sixth,

1905 to 1951, Miscellaneous Publication 203 20^

ORDER ALL PUBLICATIONS, WITH REMITTANCE, FROM TH

SUPERINTENDENT OP DOCUMENTS, GOVERNMENT PRINTIN

OFFICE, WASHINGTON 25, D.C.
Report of the

46th National Conference on

Weights and Measures 1961

Sponsored by the National Bureau of Standards

Attended by Officials From the Various

States, Counties, and Cities, and

Representatives From U.S. Government,

Industry, and Consumer Organizations.

Washington, D.C., June 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 1961.

National Bureau of Standards Miscellaneous Publication 239

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. - Price 65 cents

United States Department of Commerce

Luther H. Hodges, SecretaryNational Bureau of Standards

A. V. Astin, Director

Issued January 18, 1962
OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES

OFFICERS

(As elected by the Forty-fifth National Conference to serve during the Fortysixth National Conference)

President: A. V. Astin, Director, National Bureau of Standards.

Secretary: W. S. Bussey, Chief, Office of Weights and Measures, >Ex officio National Bureau of Standards. J Chairman: R. E. Meek, Director, Division of Weights and Measures, State

Board of Health, State of Indiana.

Vice Chairmen:

J. W. D. Harvey, State Oil Chemist, State Oil Laboratory, Department

of Revenue, State of Georgia.

H. D. Robinson, Deputy State Sealer, Department of Agriculture, State

of Maine.

A. D. Rose, County Sealer of Weights and Measures, Kern County, California.

J. D. Walton, Supervisor, Weights, Measures and Markets, Dallas, Texas.

Treasurer: C. C. Morgan, City Sealer of Weights and Measures, Gary, Indiana.

Chaplain: R. W. Searles, Deputy County Sealer of Weights and Measures,

Medina County, Ohio.

(As elected by the Forty-sixth National Conference to serve during the Fortyseventh National Conference)

President: A. V. Astin, Director, National Bureau of Standards. \ p ffi Executive Secretary: W. S.IBussey, National Bureau of Standards./

^ 0JJlc, ° Chairman: Robert Williams, County Sealer of Weights and Measures, Nassau

County, New York.

Vice Chairmen:

Paul DeVries, Municipal Superintendent'of Weights and Measures, Passaic,

New Jersey.

H. H. Houston, Director, Oil Inspection Department, State of Colorado.

F. F. Thompson, Chief Chemist, Petroleum Products Tax Division, Department of Revenue, State of Louisiana.

D. M. Turnbull, Director, Division of Licenses and Standards, Seattle,

Washington.

Treasurer: C. C. Morgan, City Sealer of Weights and Measures, Gary, Indiana.

Chaplain: R. W. Searles, Deputy County Sealer of Weights and Measures,

Medina County, Ohio.

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

(As elected by the Forty-sixth National Conference)

A. V. Astin

W. S. Bussey

R. Williams

P. DeVries

H. H. Houston }Ex officio F. F. Thompson

D. M. Turnbull

C. C. Morgan

R. W. Searles

W. H. Cramer, of New Jersey.

H. E. Crawford, of Jacksonville, Florida.

R. I. Cummings, of Altoona, Pennsylvania.

A. H. Dittrich, of New Hampshire.

G. L. Johnson, of Kentucky.

R. E. Meek, of Indiana.

D. R. Pratt, of Santa Clara County, California.

R. Rebufpo, of Nevada.

C. H. Wrenn, of Danville, Virginia.

R. Zierten, of Racine, Wisconsin.

rv
STANDING COMMITTEES

(As constituted at the conclusion of the Forty-sixth National Conference,

the personnel and organization of each of the standing committees of the Conference are as listed. As reported, the membership of each committee reflects the appointments made by the President of the Conference to fill vacancies that

have occurred from expiration of term, and the elections by the several committees of chairmen for the ensuing year. The remaining term of office for each committee member, in years, is shown by the figure in parentheses following each entry.)

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION *

J. F. True, of Kansas, Chairman (2). \Y. A. Kerlin, of California (1).

J. E. Bowen, of Newton, Massachusetts (3). C. H. Stender, of South Carolina (4).

J. T. Daniell, of Detroit, Michigan (5). COMMITTEE ON LAWS AND REGULATIONS*

J. H. Lewis, of Washington, Chairman (4). Robert Williams, of Nassau County, New York (1).

J. G. Gustafson, of Minneapolis, Minnesota (2).

ft. M. Turrell, of Pennsylvania (3). A. E. Diaz, of Puerto Rico (5). COMMITTEE ON SPECIFICATIONS AND TOLERANCES*

C. L. Jackson, of Wisconsin, Chairman (1). R. W. Searles, of Medina County, Ohio (2). A. H. Dittrich, of New Hampshire (3). T. C. Harris, Jr., of Virginia (4). H. J. McDade, of San Diego County, California (5).

' W. S. Bvssey, Executive Secretary of the Conference, is ex officio nonvoting secretary to each committee. COMMITTEES ACTING ONLY DURING THE FORTY-SIXTH

NATIONAL CONFERENCE

Committee on Noyninations: C. H. Stender, of South Carolina, Chairman; R. M.

Bodenweiser, of Mercer County, New Jersey; H. N. Duff, of Colorado;

H. E. Howard, of Miami, Florida; G. L. Johnson, of Kentucky; H. J. McDade,

of San Diego County, California; J. I. Moore, of North Carolina.

Committee on Resolutions: Raymond Rebuffo, of Nevada, Chairman; G. W. Bay,

of Missouri; J. T. Daniell, of Detroit, Michigan; W. C. Hughes, of Massachusetts; W. H. Jennings, of the District of Columbia; J. F. Madden, of New

York; N. P. Tilleman, of Green Bay, Wisconsin.

Committee on Auditing: C. W. Van Schoik, of Ohio, Chairman; W. E. Czaia, of

Minnesota; W. I. Thompson, of Monmouth County, New Jersey.

IN CHARGE OF LADIES' PROGRAM

Mrs. W. S. Bussey, Mrs. M. W. Jensen, Mrs. H. F. Wollin.

IN CHARGE OF REGISTRATION

Mrs. F. C. Bell, Mrs. E. L. Brueckner, Mrs. M. M. Brodmerkel, Mrs.

Claire Patterson.

PRESS REPRESENTATIVES

J. F. Reilly, Mrs. C. C. Atwood.

V
COMMITTEE MEETINGS, MONDAY, JUNE 12, AND TUESDAY

MORNING, JUNE 13, 1961

All day Monday and the morning of Tuesday were set aside for

meetings, both open and executive, of the Conference committees.

Announcements of these meetings were carried in the National Conference Announcement sent out April 1, 1961, and in the printed

program.

A large number of delegates took advantage of the committee

meetings and, as a result, attendance and participation were ex- ceptionally good.

The Conference committees that met on Monday were the Committee on Laws and Kegulations and the Committee on Specifications and Tolerances. The committees that met on Tuesday morning were the Executive Committee and the Committee on Education.

VI
REPORT OF THE FORTY-SIXTH NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1

FIRST SESSION—AFTERNOON OF TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 1961

(R. E. Meek, Chairman, Presiding)

The invocation was delivered and the memorial service for departed members was conducted by the Conference Chaplain, Eev.

R. W. Searles, Deputy County Sealer of Weights and Measures,

Medina County, Ohio.

Mr. John P. McBride, Past Chairman of the Conference, led the

delegates in the Pledge of Allegiance.

ADDRESS BY HON. LUTHER H. HODGES, SECRETARY OF COMMERCE

It is a great peasure to be with you today and be able to bid you

welcome personally and on behalf of the Department of Commerce.

More than a half century ago the annual report of the Director

of the National Bureau of Standards for the year 1905 contained

the following sentence : "During the year, a meeting of State sealers

of weights and measures was held at the Bureau." Eleven people

came to Washington to participate in that meeting, and the Director's report noted that "the results of the meeting were eminently

satisfactory."

From that modest beginning has come this annual Conference.

The participants now number many, many times 11. But I hope

at the conclusion of this 46th National Conference on Weights and

Measures you will feel that the results of your meeting have also

been "eminently satisfactory."

This Conference and the National Bureau of Standards have

grown up together. The Bureau was created in 1901 from the original Office of Standard Weights and Measures in the Treasury Department. Thus it was only 4 years old when it sponsored the first

of these annual Conferences.

The Bureau set out from the beginning to help the States improve their weights and measures. Among its earliest research was

work on meters for gas and electricity.

Today, we tend to take weights and measures for granted. The

average citizen does not realize how heavily he depends upon measurement. He takes it for granted when he buys canned and packaged goods even as he checks the weight on the label to compare

1 With the exception of formal papers and committee reports, the record of the 46th

National Conference on Weights and Measures has been rearranged, consolidated, con- densed, and, in some cases, comments have been eliminated wherever necessary to re- duce the printed report to essentials for future reference.

1
prices. He takes it for granted that his butcher's scales are accurate and that he is getting the gallons of gasoline indicated by the

numbers on the pump.

We can afford to take these things for granted today because of

the kind of job you and your predecessors have done at the State

and local level. You have built, through education and diligent

enforcement, the kind of atmosphere in which businessmen and their

customers alike can assume that the things they buy and sell—and

the things their business competitors buy and sell—are accurately

weighed and measured according to universally accepted standards.

I commend you for the vital work you are doing, and doing so

well.

Our job, in the Department of Commerce, is to promote and en- courage the growth of the Nation's business, trade and industry.

We seek to accomplish this through our technical agencies, such as the National Bureau of Standards, the Weather Bureau, the Patent

Office, and the Coast and Geodetic Survey; through our factfinding

and information agencies, such as the Census Bureau and the Office

of Business Economics; through our transportation agencies, the

Maritime Administration and the Bureau of Public Roads; and

through the direct business promotion activities of the Bureau of

Foreign Commerce and the Business and Defense Services Administration.

We have now added the new Area Redevelopment Administration

to this array of business development agencies, and we expect soon

to have an aggressive program to promote foreign travel to the

United States.

The scope of the Department's activities is very broad—as broad

as the connotations of the word "commerce," which range from a simple transaction in the corner grocery store to the complexities of

an international trade agreement. Through the fabric of commerce

there runs, however, a clearly identifiable thread—the need for equity

in commercial transactions, for confidence between buyer and seller

that where goods are exchanged for money there is a single, just

balance for both buyer and seller.

This trust is the very foundation of commerce, and the atmosphere of confidence is made possible by the work you do—to assure,

in the words of the motto of National Weights and Measures Week,

''That equity may prevail."

Weights and measures are as old as recorded history. Yet the

field is as dynamic as the newest frontiers of science. New developments in science and technology move rapidly into the production

and distribution of goods and services. New products, new techniques of packaging and distribution, more public and private buying of more sophisticated products, place greater responsibilities

upon weights and measures officials.

The National Bureau of Standards' programs of scientific research

provide the broad base for its technological competence. This competence enables the Bureau to help you in meeting the specialized

technical problems of weights and measures. The Bureau must continually refine the national standards of

measurement. Temperatures as low as 459 degrees below zero Fahrenheit and as high as millions of degrees must be accurately meas2
mod for scientific experiments. Length measurements must be made

with an accuracy of one-millionth of an inch for certain rocket

components. Time interval measurements to one hundred billionth

of a second are needed for satellite tracking.

Increasingly more accurate measurements are necessary for our

military and space program, for our economic progress, and for the

advancement of science itself.

A manufacturer in California must know that his parts will fit with those of a manufacturer in Florida. A merchant in New England must know his products will be weighed against the same

standards when they are sold in Alaska. In a similar manner,

through our measurement system, scientists can be sure that the

results of their experiments will be valid and meaningful to other

scientists.

We intend to support a strong, dynamic program for the National

Bureau of Standards. Tomorrow morning, it will be our pleasure

to break the ground for the Bureau's new laboratories at Gaithersburg, Maryland. The chairman of your Conference, Mr. Meek, will

be among the invited guests, and I am certain he will share our

feeling that this ceremony will symbolize a significant step forward

in meeting the measurement requirements of our country.

These new laboratories will cost more than 100 million. But the

Bureau of Standards should have the finest possible equipment and

facilities if we are to be first on the moon and continue to be the

leading technological nation on the surface of the earth.

The first of the new laboratories will permit long overdue development of accurate means of measuring forces up to 1 million

pounds. The inability to measure precisely the thrusts of great

rockets has been a major bottleneck in our rocket and space programs. And we have probably spent more than $100 million to

test rocket thrusts by the crude method of actually having to shoot

expensive rockets into the air.

The Bureau of Standards has been lagging behind the rapidly

advancing demands of modern weaponry and industrial technology.

The quality of its work, under Dr. Astin's leadership, has continued

to be above reproach, but it has lacked the financial support to

enable it to meet the demands our economy and our national security

have placed upon it. Fortunately, there is growing appreciation of the importance of

the Bureau's function in a rapidly changing, technological society.

The new laboratories will be concrete evidence of this new appreciation and new support.

The National Bureau of Standards is the cornerstone upon which

a large number of important technical agencies and activities have

.

j been built in our Federal Government. There is increasing need

I for greater coordination, communication, and planning in this vital

li I area of technological development.

Only in the last few years has there been a central agency de-

(11 voted to making available to the business and scientific communiIties the vast amount of scientific literature developed in federally

i i supported research projects and in federally financed translation of

I foreign scientific publications.
This function is now performed by the Office of Technical Services in the Department of Commerce. And already the Office has

the country's largest collection of publicly available scientific and

technical reports.

Recently our Office of Technical Services received a letter from a midwestern military command post asking for a copy of a technical

report one of its scientists had read about in a technical journal.

Providing information to technical publications on the research

reports available is, of course, part of the Office of Technical Services' task.

The revealing thing about this request was that the research re- port these military scientists wanted to see had been prepared by

scientists at the same military base—working on the other side of

the post under a different military command.

We have asked the Congress to authorize a new Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Science and Technology to help us make the

most intelligent use of Commerce's various technical agencies, and

to work with other Government agencies and private industry to

achieve more fully the benefits that can be derived from an estimated $14 billion now being spent annually for research and development. We believe Congress will grant our request.

The new Assistant Secretary would be a person of scientific and

administrative competence who could concern himself to a greater

degree than is now possible in the Department with the kind of

job we are doing to help local and State officials carry out their

duties in a highly technical society. He could provide leadership

and long-range planning within the Department, and in the fulfillment of the Department's many technical responsibilities to business, industry, and local governments.

There is no important area of science and technology today which

does not derive some measure of its support from activities within

the Department of Commerce. It is important that the scientific

and technical activities of the Department be represented by a professionally trained scientist-administrator at the highest levels of

policy deliberation.

Science and technology will have increasingly greater impact upon

our economy and our society in the years ahead. We want the

splendid scientists and engineers of the Department of Commerce to

be in the vanguard of these developments.

Science, measurement, and technology go hand in hand, and our

future prosperity will depend upon how well we all work together

to create the best standards, devise the best methods of making an

ever-increasing number of measurements, and guarantee accuracy

and equity wherever things are measured and weighed.

No job of measurement is too small to be important, and there

is no more fundamental task than to help create and maintain the

standards by which all men are Avilling to measure. Thank you for coming and taking part in this National Conference on Weights and Measures.

1
ADDRESS OF THE CONFERENCE PRESIDENT AND APPOINTMENTS TO

STANDING COMMITTEES

By A. V". Astist, Director, National Bureau of Standards

I am very pleased to be with you again today. This meeting

marks the tenth time I have appeared before you as Conference

Chairman. Looking back over the 9 years since I first had this

opportunity, I am very pleased with the progress that has been

made in matters of interest to the members and delegates to this

Conference.

One of the most important achievements was the formalization

for the first time of operating rules and procedures for the Conference, including the introduction of a new post, that of Conference

Chairman, a position which is filled by election from the Conference.

I believe this has been a very important step forward in strengthening the Conference, and I am pleased to have been able to participate in bringing it about.

Another important step was the establishment of a Weights and

Measures Advisory Committee to the Office of the Director of the

National Bureau of Standards. We have found this advisory committee most helpful and your present Conference Chairman has been

a very valuable member.

Probably the most important step taken by the NBS to improve

its services to weights and measures officials is the introduction of

specialized training courses for such officials. This activity appears

to have been very well received. It is one of the things that I hope

to see strengthened and extended in the years ahead.

The NBS publications have also continued to play an important

role for the Conference itself and for the day-to-day work of the

Conference members.

In the publication area I must report that Handbook 26 has not

yet gone to press. I think I assured you last year that it would be

in your hands by this time, but we lost the man that we were depending on to do the job. He went to Tokyo last summer on a

special assignment for the National Science Foundation, and the

job has lapsed. I have recently developed, in consultation with our

Office of Weights and Measures and, in turn, in discussions with

your Conference Chairman, a procedure which I think will get this

handbook moving, so that, if all goes well, you will have it at the

47th National Conference.

It has always been my custom in my appearances before you to

give a brief report on major occurrences during the preceding year

involving NBS and of interest to the Conference delegates. Perhaps the most significant event since we met last year was the 11th

General Conference on Weights and Measures held in Paris in October 1960. Present at this conference were delegates from approximately 30 of the 36 nations that adhere to the Treaty of the Meter.

As you know, the Treaty of the Meter is the means by which the

nations of the world cooperate to assure uniformity of measurement

throughout the world and thus provide a common basis for the

exchange of goods and scientific data.

This 11th Conference was, I believe, one of the most important

in the series of such conferences that have taken place since the

5
signing of the Treaty of the Meter in 1875. It is without question

the most significant of these conferences to be held in this century.

Perhaps the outstanding single accomplishment of the 11th Conference was the redefinition of the meter. After many years of

negotiation and research a new basis was formally adopted for defining our standard of length. This new definition in terms of a wavelength of light replaced the old definition which had been in

existence since 1889. The old definition was based on the distance

between two rulings on a bar of platinum-iridium, which was maintained in the vaults of the International Bureau of Weights and

Measures at Paris. Now, through use of advanced interferometric

techniques and our knowledge of the properties of atoms as determined by spectroscopic analysis of the light they emit, we have a more precise, a more durable, and a more universally available

standard of length. Thus, the meter is now defined as 1,650,763.73

wavelengths of the orange-red radiation from the krypton 86 atom.

In the United States, as in the other English-speaking countries,

the common units of length, such as the inch, foot, and mile, are based

on the meter. Thus the action with respect to the meter means that

the inch is now defined as 41,929.398742 wavelengths of this particular radiation of krypton 86.

This new definition made no significant change in the length of

the inch. Actually we cannot say whether its length was changed

or not. We can only say that it was not changed by more than one

part in ten million since this is approximately the uncertainty with

which we can make length measurements. We are certain that the

new definition will make no difference in your operations. It is,

however, of major importance to some branches of our advancing

technology which will require ever-increasing accuracies for length

measurement.

Another important achievement of the 11th General Conference

on Weights and Measures was the initiation of a program for international collaboration in the standardization of techniques for meas- uring ionizing radiations. These are the radiations associated with

atomic energy development X-rays, and with the use of radioactive isotopes in a variety of scientific and industrial applications.

Through this new program in the International Bureau, we shall

have a means of assuring that measurements in this field will be

properly compatible throughout the world.

Another achievement of this international meeting was a redefinition of the second—or rather a ratification of an earlier tentative

definition of the second. The second had been defined as 1/86,400

part of a mean solar day. Since the mean solar day is a somewhat

indefinite quantity, and since the days are known to vary in length,

it was necessary to provide a more stable basis for time measurement. So the second was formally defined in October of I960' as a fraction of the tropical year 1900. The specific fraction is 1/31,556,-

925.9747, approximately 1/31 millionth of the year.

The General Conference recognized that this definition of our

unit of time was an interim one and urged the national laboratories

to pursue their researches on new techniques in order to arrive at an

atomic definition for time that would be analogous in some respects

to the atomic definition for our unit of length.

6
The General Conference also authorized an increase in the annual

operating budget for the International Bureau of Weights and

Measures. This change was long overdue since the International

Bureau had been operating on a more or less static budget since

(he l!)20*s in spite of the tremendous growth in its responsibilities

for international coordination of measurements within the past few

decades.

Important but minor compared with the things I have just mentioned were actions taken in improving the definition of temperature, and decisions on some of the terminology relative to weights

and measures activities.

The Conference also made an attempt to revise the Treaty of the

Meter. However, the attempt was unsuccessful, largely because of

political differences between some of the member nations, and so

this needed action was deferred.

We were, however, successful in accomplishing all of the technical or scientific objectives which lay before the Conference at its

beginning.

Turning now to the National Bureau of Standards, I am pleased

to report that we have made significant progress in many parts of our technical program, and in addition have brought about a number of administrative improvements.

I shall mention only a few of the developments in our technical

program. In our laboratories we ai*e working to improve even

further our ability to make accurate length measurements. Using

radiations from mercury atoms, we have already devised methods

pointing to an even better standard of length than the one that was

adopted last October. Such a standard would have at least 10 times

the accuracy of the krypton definition of the meter.

We have also been working very actively toward an atomic definition of time. Recently, at our laboratories in Boulder, Colorado,

we achieved some of the most accurate measurements that have been

made anywhere in the world on a potential time-interval and frequency standard. Some of our measurements there have been consistently reproducible to a part or two in one hundred billion.

We have also made substantial improvements in our ability to measure temperature throughout the entire range from near absolute zero up to many thousands of degrees. In this work we have

been attempting to extend both the range over which we can measure temperature and the accuracy with which we can make measure- ments throughout the range.

Our sound laboratory has developed an electronic detection system for studying sound, waves that are propagated through the at- mosphere at frequencies too low for the human ear to perceive.

These inaudible sounds, which we call infrasonic waves, are caused

by earthquakes, tornaclic storms, and geomagnetic disturbances. Our

detection method promises to be of value not only in following the

path of tornadic disturbances but also in learning more about the

physics of the upper atmosphere.

In connection with the work of our Central Radio Propagation

Laboratory in Boulder, we are now installing an elaborate observation facility in Peru, at an expected cost of about $1 million. This

installation will be on the magnetic equator and will thus give us a

7
powerful new means of exploring the electrical characteristics of

the earth's atmosphere.

Turning now to the administrative side of our program, I think

one of the significant achievements was the formulation of a mission

statement for the National Bureau of Standards. We believe this

statement will provide focus for our work; it will help us to choose

among various jobs we might do and to assign priorities to the jobs

we have undertaken.

We consider that our mission at NBS is to provide national leadership in the development and utilization of uniform, accurate techniques for physical measurements.

This mission has three major parts. The first is to provide the

central basis within the United States for a complete, consistent

system of physical measurement, adequate in all areas of science and

technology. The second part is to provide essential services leading

to accurate and uniform physical measurement throughout the Nation's science, industry, and commerce. Included in these services are the calibration of instruments, the provision of standard samples, and the assistance we render to the weights and measures offi- cials in the States. The third part of our mission is to use our measurement competence to provide data on the properties of matter and materials which are of importance to science, industry, and

commerce, and which are not available of sufficient accuracy elsewhere.

To help us carry out this mission, we have been exploring the

adequacy of our present measurement services. We have found that

many of the services we furnish in the calibration of instruments

and apparatus are inadequate to the needs of modern technology,

particularly the needs of major national programs involving atomic

energy, high-speed aircraft, missiles, and space exploration. With

the aid of the military agencies and industrial groups, such as the

Aerospace Industries Association, a number of problem areas in

measurement have been identified. As we cannot hope to work si- multaneously in all these areas, we have attempted to devise methods of assigning priorities to the many new measurement services

we are being asked to furnish. We have also encouraged the establishment of military and industrial standards laboratories which

serve as intermediaries between NBS and the plant or shop. To

aid these new laboratories in their work, we issued during the past

year NBS Handbook 77, Precision Measurement and Calibration.

This three-volume handbook is a selective compilation of our previous publications, many of which are now out of print, in the

important areas of measurement and calibration.

To strengthen NBS-inclustry cooperation in this general field, we

have established a new advisory committee on Calibration and

Measurement Services. This action was taken in cooperation with

a number of the major industrial trade associations of the country,

such as the Aerospace Industries Association and the American

Ordnance Association.

We have also been cooperating with the George Washington University in establishing a new curriculum dealing specifically with

the science of precision measurement. The new course of study, an- nounced this past winter by the university, will lead to degrees in

8
this field. The importance of this program lias brought support

from a number of industrial organizations.

During the formative stages of the program, the Bureau has been

supplying some teaching and faculty assistance to the university.

If the new curriculum is successful and is adopted in other universities, it will do much toward improving the measurement competence of the Nation in the years ahead.

March 3, 1961, was the National Biireau of Standards' 60th anniversary. We had a little celebration on this occasion, a sort of

family-type party at which the Secretary of Commerce and his

associates were present as well as other Government officials who

are concerned with NBS.

At our birthday celebration we featured the fact that we were

in the midst of planning to relocate the Bureau to our new site at

Gaithersburg, Maryland, about 16 miles northwest of here. I have

mentioned our relocation plans to you before, but this past year

has seen a very important transition in the program : the planning

stage has come to a head and we are now embarking on the building

stage. The Congress gave us $23.5 million for fiscal year 1961 to

start the construction of new laboratories. The first contract was

let a few weeks ago and ground will be broken tomorrow morning

for this important acquisition of facilities.

We are having a simple ground-breaking ceremony and have invited your Chairman to be present to represent you at this important event. If our facilities at Gaithersburg are completed reason- ably well on schedule, we shall be able to invite you to our new

laboratories by the time of the 50th National Conference on Weights

and Measures.

Finally, I should like to bring to your attention certain administrative actions and decisions within the National Bureau of Standards concerning our weights and measures program. I think many

of you are aware that for several years I haAre felt that the National

Conference on Weights and Measures should receive stronger assist- ance from the Bureau toward increased accomplishments and influ- ence. We have explored many of the possibilities and have finally

arrived at certain conclusions that I wish to report to you now.

Effective July 1, 1961, two organizational changes will be made

in the weights and measures area at the Bureau. This action is

being taken in order to maintain and strengthen our contribution

to State and local weights and measures agencies and related busi- ness and industry, to place Bureau sponsorship of and contribution

to the National Conference on a higher and more independent level,

to give specific direction to the more technical aspects of the Bureau's weights and measures activity, and to bring our weights and

measures program into organizational conformance with other technical programs.

First, there will be created the position of Assistant to the Director for Weights and Measures Administration. The incumbent

will report directly to me and will be designated to serve as Executive Secretary of the National Conference on Weights and Measures,

and as Chairman of the Weights and Measures Advisory Committee.

The Assistant to the Director will also be responsible for the

deA-elopment of recommendations dealing with model laws and

9
regulations and for maintaining a program of personal contact with

weights and measures officials and their associations. He will serve

as the channel for the dissemination of appropriate advice on administrative matters.

Secondly, we are attempting to strengthen the technical activities

of the Office of Weights and Measures itself. The Office will con- tinue to administer its present program, but organizationally it will

be removed from the Office of the Director, where it is now located,

and will take its place among the other technical operating units of

the Bureau. The relocated Office of Weights and Measures will be

responsible for technical measurement activities in weights and measures areas, specifically matters dealing with testing equipment; test- ing procedures; specifications and tolerances for commercial weighing devices ; the design, construction, and use of standards of weights

and measures, including new State standards and instruments; and

the program for the training of State and local weights and measures officials in the technical aspects of their work.

As you can see from what I haA^e said, the Assistant to the Director will carry out those activities associated with the Office of

the Director that have preAdously been performed in the Office of

Weights and Measures. The Office of Weights and Measures is much

smaller than the other technical operating divisions of the Bureau;

for that reason Ave will continue to call it an office rather than a

diAasion, but in all other respects it will be treated as one of the

Bureau's technical operating evasions.

W. S. Bussey is to be appointed as the Assistant to the Director

for Weights and Measures Administration and M. W. Jensen is to

be appointed Chief of the Office of Weights and Measures, effective

July 1. I recognize that what is being done Avill require certain modifications in the organization and procedures of the National Conference

as presently constituted. I am confident, however, that the Conference will cooperate with us in this matter. The Conference Secretary Avill haA^e the specific amendments to propose to you later in

this meeting, and I trust that you Avill give your unanimous consent to the support of Mr. Bussey's proposal.

Noav, before turning the meeting back to your Chairman, I should

like to announce certain appointments which it is my responsibility

to make as ex officio President of the Conference. These are as

foIIoavs : To the Committee on Education to succeed HoAvard E. Crawford

of Jacksonville, Florida, I appoint John T. Daniell of Detroit,

Michigan.

Next, to the Committee on Laws and Regulations to succeed

George L. Johnson of Kentucky, I appoint Agustin E. Diaz of Puerto

Rico.

To the Committee on Specifications and Tolerances, to succeed

Donald M. Turnbull of Seattle, Washington, I appoint H. J. McDade

of San Diego County, California.

All three of these appointments are for 5-year terms.

This concludes the matters that I have to report to you at this

time. I appreciate very much your attention. I appreciate even

10
more the opportunity I have had, and shall continue to have, of

working with you toward the important objectives of this Conference.

PRESENTATION OF HONOR AWARDS

Dr. Astin presented "Honor Awards" to 18 members of the Conference who, by attending the 45th Conference in 1960, reached one

of the four attendance categories for which recognition is made—that

is, attendance at 10, 15, 20, and 25 meetings.

HONOR AWARD RECIPIENTS

20-Year Certificates W. S. Bussey, D. W. Kingsley, R. E. Meek, C. C. Morgan.

15-Year Certificates

S. H. Christie, Jr., L. G. Close, H. E. Howard, W. E. Louthan,

R. D. Thompson.

10-Year Certificates Mrs. F. C. Bell, J. A. Bernard, R. K. Bodenwieser, A. H. Dittrich,

J. E. Mahoney, Joseph Shaw, C. H. Stender, C. E. Wagner, O. H.

Watson.

ADDRESS

By P. C. Beinkley, Commissioner, Department of Agriculture and

Immigration., State of Yvrgimia; representing also the National

Association of State Departments of Agriculture

I am happy to have this chance to speak before this great Conference again.

I had that pleasure at your 1958 National Conference, and I told

you then that weights and measures was one of my favorite subjects. I can tell you now that it is still one of my favorites.

And I can also tell you that the National Association of State

Departments of Agriculture is still vitally interested in weights and

measures, because once again I am representing that organization,

and bring greetings from them.

If I had time, I could tell you that since I talked to you last

time, we in Virginia have increased our weights and measures force

by about half and increased our appropriations by about threefourths.

I could also tell you that we have increased our checking of largecapacity scales by one-third and our small scales by one-fifth, and

that we have increased our checkweighing of prepackaged foods until last fiscal year we passed the half million mark, and this year

we will pass 2y2 million packages.

I could give you the latest report on our checkweighing of lime,

fertilizer, and feed and tell you that there has been a really splendid improvement in the picture for these commodities, and I could

tell you that the seed industry in Virginia is also moving along

toward a true net for net method of selling.

I could tell you that we have moved into a new field of checking

on the fill of milk cartons from the dairy plant and an old field of

checking bulk tanks on the dairy farm.

But these are points of progress that any good weights and measures man can bring about, if he has the men and the money, and

613254—61 2 11
the laws and regulations, and the backing of top management that

he ought to have.

What I really wanted to talk to you about is this item of management, because if we have good management we do not have as much trouble getting the other ingredients of a good Aveights and

measures program.

The first ingredient of course is the law itself.

If we are only interested in testing scales and do not bother much

with other parts of the weights and measures job, this business of

law is not so hard to handle. All we would really need is a law

saying that scales must be accurate.

But we do not have to get very far into weights and measures work before we find out that the business of buying and selling will

not stand still for any law. So if we are to do our job and our whole job, we must see that our laws and our regulations attempt

to keep pace with modern merchandising.

This past year in Virginia, we have completely rewritten our

weights and measures law so that we can submit it to the 1962

General Assembly.

First, we prepared a version based on the model law and our

experience in the field. Then we went over this version sentence by

sentence with our Weights and Measures Advisory Committee from

industry. Then we mailed out over 800 copies to interested persons,

including about 40 trade associations of one sort or another, and of course including each member of our House and Senate.

I suspect that most Aveights and measures men AA7 ould feel that

this was pretty risky business, submitting a whole new Aveights and

measures law for eA'erybody to shoot at in the legislature.

But our experience with other la ays has been that Avhen most of

the people directly concerned knoAv what you are planning to do,

and have each detail explained to them, a good deal of the anticipated opposition is pretty well spiked in adA^ance.

This is particularly true if you have taken pains to build up a reputation for being fair and for getting the job clone. In Virginia

Ave have always figured that in the regulatory field, Ave had two

jobs to do, and that they had to be done together.

One was to protect the consumer where he could not protect himself. The other was to create an atmosphere in which industry could

thrive and prosper.

I believe that success in any phase of Aveights and measures depends on how well you can balance these two objectives.

To sum up the essentials of providing enough authority, both in

the law and in its regulations, let me say that the people subject to

laws must know what you propose and must have confidence in the

man Avho proposes it. This is true all the way up the line with a State department of

agriculture or within a weights and measures section. If you make

sure that the man at the top knows what you are trying to do and

that he has confidence in you, most of your troubles with management are over. But both of these requirements add up to one thing, and that is,

meticulous attention to detail.

12
Attention to detail is a basic necessity in the second ingredient of a good weights and measures program, and that is financing.

No weights and measures program is going to operate without

money, and money is harder to get all the time. But if we understand the process of getting it, sometimes it comes a little easier.

The job of any legislature is to divide up the total number of

dollars they have among the people and agencies and programs that

ask for some. In most cases, there is not enough money to meet all

requests.

In the process of budget cutting, the legislature is going to be

guided pretty much by what its members are persuaded the need is. This same procedure follows on down the line of budget approval. First, the head of the division in which weights and measures is located must be persuaded of the need. Then the Commissioner himself must be persuaded. Then the legislature must be

persuaded.

This is a lot of persuading, and it takes a lot of facts and details

to get it done. In Virginia, Tom Harris begins preparing his budget

18 months before the General Assembly meets, and he builds his

case like a lawyer building a brief for the Supreme Court.

When he gets through, it is kind of hard to argue that he does

not need that much money. After talking the budget over with

him, I am pretty well armed to go to the legislature.

Of course, what this really means is that Tom has been out there

getting the job done. This is the only Avay he can determine the

needs and justify them in terms of dollars.

But we are in the process of setting up IBM equipment that will

tell us even more about the needs in weights and measures work and

in many of our other regulatory and marketing functions. This

equipment will analyze our inspection reports and pinpoint the

places we need to concentrate on and give us even more complete and

detailed information on needs.

Using this equipment for program analysis in our fertilizer inspection program, we have already found that we can increase our

overall effectiveness many times by concentrating our time and men

and money where the problems are. There is another whole area where we can all increase our effectiveness, and that is the field of communications. I mean just tell- ing the other folks who are concerned what we are doing and what

we plan to do.

The most obvious kind of communications, and the kind we seem

to forget most often, is internal communications. We forget sometimes that nearly every other section of a department is affected by

what weights and measures people do.

For instance, we found in Virginia that we could make our program of checkweighing fertilizer much more effective by first making a survey. When we showed the industry the survey results, it was much easier for us to get the industry into compliance.

That was an example of good communications. We do not always do that well. Our dairy inspection folks went to a convention recently and found themselves besieged by milk processors wanting to know what we were doing changing our regulations on the

size of milk containers. The dairy inspection force did not know.

13
They did not find out until later that Tom Harris was also at the

convention with copies of our proposed new weights and measures

law.

I do not believe there is anything that makes a public agency

look quite as bad in the public eye as to be in the position where

the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing.

You can get in pretty bad too if you have a breakdown in ex- ternal communications. Most of the public relations fires we have

to try to put out got started because we did not explain what we

were trying to do, or what we were going to do, or what we had

already done, to somebody.

In Virginia, we have found that a most effective method of doing

this is through industry advisory committees. These are committees

from industry that we pick out to meet with us on a regular basis

to hear us explain our problems and to keep us informed about the

workings of that industry.

We have had some pretty warm sessions in some of our advisory

committees, but as soon as the members saw that we wanted to be

reasonable and were genuinely interested in getting a good job done,

they were more than willing to meet us halfway.

I have already told you how far we go in trying to keep everybody informed when I listed all the people who got advance copies

of our revised weights and measures law.

This business of building good communications is like building a marriage. You have to keep working at it all the time. If you do,

it pays tremendous dividends. If you do not, it can make your life

pretty miserable.

Another tool we put to use in our weights and measures work is information. It should go without saying that if a man knows what

he is supposed to do under the law and if he knows who is enforcing the law and how it is being enforced, he is much more likely to

comply voluntarily.

We all know for sure that there will never be enough men or enough money to keep every single soul honest in the field of weights

and measures. Our law enforcement is going to be effective in direct proportion to the voluntary compliance we can encourage.

So it is up to us to put out all the information we can about our work and keep as many organizations and key people as we can informed about what we are doing in the field.

These are some of the techniques we can use to help ourselves do a

better job in weights and measures, and I know of no area where

we need more to use every technique we can to constantly do a

better job.

We all know that weights and measures is an area in which the

responsibility is largely on the State and the locality to get the job

done, and by and large it will always be that way, because so much

of weights and measures work must be done at the point where the

goods are turned over to the consumer.

If we neglect our responsibilties, however, we are in a poor position to complain if the people demand that somebody fill this need

that is so vital.

We get wonderful help and cooperation from Federal agencies,

particularly the National Bureau of Standards, but ours is the legal

14
responsibility for weights and measures in our respective States and

localities. Ours is also the moral responsibility to be true to our

jobs, true to the people we are duty bound to protect, and most

important of all, true to ourselves.

There are really only two ways to go at any job, including weights

and measures. One is to do as little as possible and stir up as little

trouble as possible. The other is to do the job as well as we know

how.

The second way is much more difficult. The path is straight and

narrow and usually studded with stones. It requires a bigger and

a better man to walk that path, because there are always those who

watch and wait for the slightest slip.

But if this path be harder, the rewards inevitably are greater.

This is the great truth of life.

There is no greater reward for a man than the satisfaction of a job well clone and no greater peace than the sleep of the man whose

conscience is clear.

PACKAGE STANDARDIZATION—A MORAL OBLIGATION

By R. TV. Coyne, President, Distilled Spirits Institute, Inc.,

Washington, D.G.

Your invitation for me to appear here today is felt by the membership of my organization to be a singular honor. Obviously, there

is great personal satisfaction in addressing you.

As I appear before you to discuss the moral obligations of manufacturers in their commercial dealings, I respect the fact that I am

speaking to the Nation's chief protectors of honorable commercial

transactions. While you are not the Federal Trade Commission,

you are primary monitors of honest transactions between the oftforgotten consumer and the seller.

The Distilled Spirits Institute, which I represent here, is a trade

association of domestic distilling companies that account for more

than 70 percent of the distilled spirits sold in the United States.

The Institute last year made an appearance before the Alcohol and

Tobacco Tax Division of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service at which

it vigorously opposed a proposal of a small but powerful group in

the industry to permit the use and sale of nonstandardized bottles.

When national prohibition was repealed in 1933, the Federal

Government established eight standard sizes of liquor bottles. The

standard sizes have been in use for the past 27 years. The proposal

for change made by this small group would permit packaging in

any size bottle or, in lieu of that, allow bottling in a number of

additional sizes.

The Institute membership felt that approval of either of these

proposals would lead to the perpetration of a gigantic fraud upon

the public. It felt that the packaging standards that had been laid

down -by the Federal Government had become known over the years

to the consuming public; that these sizes were not conceived in fraud;

that they generally emulated the common law with respect to standards; and that they should be continued unchanged both as being

sufficient for the needs of the public and as being necessary to preserve the integrity of a very large industry.

15
I take it, ladies and gentlemen, that the position of our organization for maintenance of standard bottle sizes has some relationship

with my appearance here today. To be frank, if this intraindustry

battle had not occurred last year—and, incidentally, the Federal

Government has not yet resolved the issue—I believe that I and my

associates would not have come to know the work and the value of

the work of the National Conference on Weights and Measures, of

the weights and measures officials throughout the country, and of

this particular function of the National Bureau of Standards and

its splendid personnel.

Most people have no real comprehension of the work of Federal,

State, county, and municipal weights and measures officers. Too

often we take it for granted that in ordinary commercial transactions the parties on both sides will for the most part be fair and

square. We tend to forget that the majority of such transactions are on the up and up only because people before us had the sense

to write into law standards for fair and square dealing and to

provide for efficient enforcement of such laws through weights and

measures officers. These predecessors recognized the need for standards in commercial dealings and for the enforcement of such standards as they had also recognized the need for policing authorities

to curb crime and of the judiciary to administer justice.

I feel that the greater part of the public needs better understanding of and education in your vital work. Like my associates and

myself, we just never give your work the attention it should compel.

We do think of the judiciary—because of the frequent appearance

in news stories of spectacular court cases. But I find it difficult to

remember public recognition of your work both in establishing and

in enforcing standards in our commercial life, and I doubt that I

would be here today if the firms I represent did not get into a

bitter struggle about standard-size bottles. I know, of course, I

would not be here if my team did not represent the ideals which

you are dedicated to uphold.

The industry I represent is acutely aware of its social responsibilities. When it sought and received the assistance you gave it, as a matter of principle, it was and is truly overwhelmed with gratitude. As a matter of information, you and we were joined in opposition to the odd-size bottle proposal by the Liquor Control Commissioners of practically all States, as well as by the Tax and

Revenue Commissioners of many States.

I mention, merely in passing, that Institute members imposed on

themselves self-discipline of an unusual nature. This discipline is embodied in a series of resolutions passed by the board of directors

of the Institute which collectively we call the DSI volunteer code.

It is noteworthy, too, that some industry members, not presently

DSI members and therefore not responsible to the Institute, adhere strictly to the Institutes rules. I trust they share our pride in

their adherence to the self-imposed code.

Federal regulations presently hold that standards of fill, the ab- sence of which connotes deceptive packaging, are necessary to prevent consumer deception. The Federal Alcohol Administration Act

of 1935 spells out some of the details of packaging in a section designed to prevent "Unfair Competition and Unlawful Practices."

16
We and your spokesmen held at the ATTD hearings last year

i hat destandardization of bottle sizes would be an invitation for a consumable industry to indulge in rank consumer confusion and

deception.

The hearings brought forth testimony from both public officials

and a fourth or fifth estate of citizens, such as The Consumers

Union, that deceptive packaging today is a monstrous fraud on the

public, is widespread and wasteful, and endangers our free enterprise system.

The hearings brought forth evidence that there are two types of

deception involved in packaging. One is the matter of fill—an

8-inch-wide package may contain only 5 inches in width of consumable contents, the remaining width containing nonconsumable filler

material such as paper or cotton, or what-have-you. I understand

the Federal Food and Ding Administration is presently conducting

a drive to stamp out this type of fraud.

The second type of fraud—and that which our organization is trying to prevent—pertains to container sizes. The hearings brought

out that consumer deception in this field is widespread. One witness pointed out something that you officials are acutely aware of,

but of which the unsuspecting public is largely unaware.

He said that in any number of instances he found that the large

"economy" size or "family" size package of a number of products

found in the ordinary supermarket, where our wives shop, costs more

per ounce than the smaller size package of the same product. In

other words, the consumer was being misled into thinking that the

"economy size" was truly economical.

Without elaborating on details of our last year's case with the

Federal Government, let me point out that one proposal would have

permitted the bottling of the % quart, or 21.333 ounces. While

the popular fifth bottle is not a multiple or binary submultiple of

the standard quart, it was adopted along with the standard multiples and submultiples of the gallon measure by the Federal Government because the size had, in effect, achieved its own standardization both in our country before prohibition and even before then

in Europe.

I realize the fifth size has been opposed by this group. I might

well oppose it if it were first proposed today. Its historical existence

and its widespread use in World War II, when conservation was a

purpose, give warrant for its present acceptance. Its acceptance,

however, does not justify compounding of a clanger of deception by

abandonment of the multiple and binary submultiple principle.

We contended that proponents of the change aimed at selling the

lesser size at the same amount as now charged for the larger size.

Further, we held that competition would inevitably force the whole

industry to do the same thing—use odd-size bottles—thereby giving

the public less for more. Weights and measures standards and the integration of the distilling industry's issue into the context of this important subject

warrant great care and respect. For centuries, weights and measures problems have commanded the attention of philosophers, theologians, lawmakers, and merchants. Their roots in antiquity are not easy to find. They are there, however, for those who look.

17
They compel one to regard with awe and even reverence their consideration through the ages as a vital implementation to human

relationships.

In ancient writings we find not complete answers, but bench cuttings and trail marks that guided them and should guide us. The

division of the fruits of the earth and the product of man's toil was

the seed of contention leading to strife and murder, war between the

tribes of old, and between the obscure groupings that preceded the

tribes. The terms of dealing in man's substance were evolved through

bitter experience and at great price. These standards were hard

come by. Deviations, however plausible and whatever the surface

attraction, warrant consummate caution.

"Let the buyer be present when the wine is drawn" began an

English royal pronouncement of fair measure. One hundred forty years ago, as so many of you know, John

Quincy Adams wrote: "When weights and measures present themselves to the contemplation of the legislator, and call for the interposition of law, the first and most prominent idea that occurs to

him is uniformity. . . . His purposes are uniformity, permanence,

universality, one standard to be the same for all men and for all

purposes, and to continue to be the same forever."

As far as providing the public with adequate information about a product, distilled liquor, probably more than any other commodity,

has been of never-ending public concern throughout the history of our country. This is understandable because of the fact that there are so many elements involved in appraising the product—the quantity, the strength, the quality, the age, the class and type, and even

the place where produced, just to mention a few. It is not surprising, therefore, that we find standards of fill and measure for alcoholic beverages to have been a subject which occupied the attention

of the earliest American colonial lawmaking bodies. The Grand

Assembly of the Virginia Colony at its session of 1661-62, held at

James City, enacted Act XCVII reading as follows:

Whereas, continual complaints are made of the exactyon of ordinary keepers and others in the rates and measures of strong drinke by them retayled

and sold, Be it enacted that noe person after the first of March 1663, shall

sell or vend by retayle any wine, beere or other strong drinks of what sort soever by any measure but English sealed measures of pints, quarts, pottles

[half-gallons] or gallons, and that every one that now doth or hereafter shall

keep any ordinary shall by the said first of March 1663 provide such measures to sell by in his house ; and in case he fails, to be put down from keeping any ordinary, and fined five thousand pounds of tobacco to the use of the

publique. Provided alwayes that it shall be lawful for them to sell strong

waters comeing over in cases by the bottle in the same bottles they bought

them.

A historian 1 tells us in the following words the reason for the

passage of this act:

Notwithstanding the additional restraints before mentioned (licenses, bonds,

etc.), violations of the act fixing the prices of drinks continued to harass the

assembly. Ordinary keepers who were too conscientious to sell above the fixed

rates, did not hesitate, it seems, to establish their own standard of measures,

by the use of which they practically evaded the law, without exposing themselves to punishment.

i G. Alius Thomann, "Colonial Liquor Laws, Part 2, Liquor Laws of the United States, Their Spirit and Effect," p. 52.

18
So, while it is unquestionably true that the distilled spirits industry, due to mounting- costs and over-heavy taxation, faces a dilemma

of sizable proportions, we do not, like the tavern-keepers of 1660,

I seek a solution of the problem by establishing our own misleading

standard of measures. The purpose of standards of weights and measures is to vnform,

but not to confuse and deceive. Quality, quantity, and price seem

| to be the basis for the ordinary shopper. Through appropriate

standards, we emphasize quality and cost, and deemphasize quantity, an opposite of quality. With your grace, I repeat that our common task is to emphasize quality and cost, and to deemphasize

quantity.

Proponements of more bottle sizes support their request for adoption of odd-size bottles on the ground that it will permit the industry to "package to price." The term itself connotes deception

in that it suggests giving the consumer less for his money, accompanied by a juggling of package sizes. With surprising candor,

proponents, in their brief requesting the change, admit this objective in the following statement:

Industry, generally, has found it necessary to package to price so as to avoid increasing prices by reducing the size of the packages on foods. The

distilled spirits industry faces similar problems due to the squeeze between

rising production costs and unit prices. . . . In a related field, razor blades, packaged 21 to a container, are now being

sold IS to a container, but at the former price. . . . It would appear therefore that the food industry, generally, is up against

the same inflationary problem and that they have had to increase their con- sumer unit prices but have done it in part by increasing the dollars and cents

price and in part by decreasing the package quantity.

In short, the "packaging to price" philosophy, stripped of its verbiage, is merely a price-raising device to be accomplished, not by

the conventional method of raising the price of an existing bottle

size, but by a more subtle method of reducing the size of the container.

Proponents of odd-size bottles, in support of their position, point

1 to the reduction in sizes of packages of certain other commodities,

giving examples of items ranging from cereals to soap pads, and

caption the list "Packing to Popular Price Consumer Wants To

Spend." Among the items which proponents cite as an example

y i of "Packing to Popular Price Consumer Wants To Spend" are

t found the following:

Instant Nonfat Dry Milk 9% oz 25 cents. Instant Nonfat Dry Milk 2 lb. 6% oz 83 cents. With the aid of our slide rule and expert mathematicians, we

have arrived at the following computations in relation to these two

size packages of the same product : the smaller package is priced at

the rate of 2.6041+ cents per ounce, and the larger package at the

d

\ rate of 2.1614+ cents per ounce. Thus, if the housewife had taken

her slide rule and an expert mathematician with her to the super1 market, she would have been able to determine that, by buying the

larger package of dried milk, she would have saved 0.4427 cent per

ounce. Had the smaller package of dried milk been packaged in an

8-ounce package (that is, one-half pound), the price at the same rate

would have been 21 cents. Why a 9%-ounce package at 25 cents is

19
a more "'popular'' price than a package of 8 ounces at 21 cents we

are not informed. Nor do we know why the larger package of 2

pounds 6% ounces is better than if it had been packed in a 21/2-pound

package at 87 cents. We do say that the consumer could compare

the relative values of a i/

2 -pound package at a cost of 21 cents and

a 2!/2-pound package at a cost of 87 cents, but that the consumer

could not possibly make a value comparison between a 9%-ounce

package at 25 cents and a 2 pound 6% ounce package at 83 cents.

Resultant consumer confusion is the inevitable result, if indeed not

the basic motive of packaging in containers of a capacity which

leaves the consumer utterly helpless in comparing values. We and

you asked the ATTD, in view of the responsibility which the law

places upon the Treasury Department, to prevent consumer deception as to container sizes of distilled spirits so as not to open the

door to utter confusion in the packaging of distilled spirits.

While, as we have emphasized, there is consumer deception and

confusion involved in the ill-intended odd ounce and fractional ounce packages of some commodities, we should point out that there

is no Federal Dried Milk Administration Act, but there is a Federal Alcohol Administration Act requiring distilled spirits to be

packaged in containers which will not deceive the consumer. Secondhy, consumers have not been accustomed to ordering dried milk

or soap pads by the quart, or by the pint, but that is the traditional

way of buying distilled spirits. Thirdly, grocery and household

items are sold primarily in self-service markets where the purchaser

at least has the opportunity of inspecting the package before dropping it into a shopping cart. But spirits are still sold generally over the counter, and if a purchaser orders a "fifth" of liquor he

will ordinarily accept without inspection a bottle of relative size

which is passed to him, even though through design or unawareness

the clerk might pass him a 21.33-ounce bottle instead of 25.6 ounces. In listing commodities which are packaged in irrationally sized

packages, proponents of odd sizes fail to mention that there are a large number of products which under State laws, as you know,

are required to be packaged in containers of a specified capacity.

In most every State, fresh fluid milk may be sold at retail in containers of 1 gallon, y2 gallon, 3 pints, 1 quart, 1 pint, i/2 pint, and

1 gill only. Similarly, butter may be sold at retail only in packages

of 14 pound, 1 pound, or multiples of 1 pound. Many other products, if prepackaged, are required by the States to be sold only in packages of a specified weight or capacity, such as bread, flour, oleomargarine, and in some States even a bunch of carrots must contain

a specified number of carrots.

State, county, and municipal governments have a vital interest in

the subject matter of liquor bottle sizes, and the Federal Government consequently has a grave responsibility to the States in con- sidering the establishment of new standards of fill for distilled spirits.

From the beginning, administrators of the FAA Act have sought

to encourage the States to adopt the FAA regulations relating to

labeling and advertising. In response to this encouragement, many

of the States have adopted in whole or in part FAA regulations

relating to labeling, advertising, standards of identity, and even

standards of fill. As to standards of fill, there has been little pur20
pose in a State adopting the Federal standards, since such Federal

standards applied whether or not adopted by the States. The FAA

standards of till have governed container sizes in interstate commerce, and Internal Revenue container regulations have made these

standards between \2 Pmt and a gallon applicable to intrastate

transactions. In the main, therefore, the States have confined their

regulation of container sizes to prescribing minimum and maximum

size containers and have accepted the Federal standards between

such minimums and maximums. Only six States 2 have prescribed

specific standards of fill for distilled spirits, and three more 3 have

made a blanket adoption of FAA standards. Thus, the vast majority of States which either have not adopted standards of fill in

reliance upon the protection afforded by FAA and Internal Revenue regulations or which have made a blanket adoption of FAA

standards would have imposed upon them, in effect without their

consent, the odd-size containers advocated by proponents in the

event, of amendment of FAA regulations to authorize the same. The

States which have relied upon Federal controls are justly entitled

to protection of regulations they have adopted—regulations which

1 were patterned at the Federal level.

In addition, 11 States 4 would levy a tax penalty on the consumer

by the use of one or more of the proponents' suggested odd-size containers either because the State tax is levied on the basis of a specii fied quantity (such as a pint) or fraction thereof, or because tax

stamps are provided only in specified denominations, any intermediate size container being required to bear a stamp of the next higher

denomination.

It is interesting to note that the y20 gallon advocated by proponents of new sizes would, under existing State laws and regulations, be an illegal package in 18 of the 32 license States 5 and would

undoubtedly be refused listing by most all, if not all, of the 17

monopoly States. This would leave only a potential market for the

V20 gallon in 11 States, and we have not the slightest doubt that

this potential market would be promptly and substantially curtailed

by State action.

Internal Revenue container regulations have from the very beginning 6 complemented the FAA standards of fill by adopting these

standards as applied to containers of a capacity of y2 Pmt or more. These container regulations are promulgated under the sole authority of the provision of the Internal Revenue Code authorizing such

1 regulations when the Secretary or his delegate deems such necessary

to protect the revenue. Thus, it must be presumed that the proposed

Vs-gallon, %-gallon, and y12

- gallon-size containers must have been

prohibited for protection of the revenue. The U.S. Supreme Court has said that: "Laws are made to protect the trusting as well as the suspicious." 7 And a Federal District

2 Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Texas.

3 California, Delaware, Massachusetts.

4 Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota,

South Dakota, Tennessee, Wisconsin.

5 Arizona, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky,

Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South

Carolina, Tennessee, Texas.

6 Internal Revenue Regulations No. 13, issued August 1934 in Art. 1(e) stated in

I part, ". . . the regulations in that regard (bottle sizes) heretofore promulgated by the Federal Alcohol Administration being hereby adopted as a part of these regulations."

i Federal Trade Com. v. Standard Educational Soc, 302 U.S. 112.

21
Court, in holding that marking of net contents on the package is not

sufficient to prevent misleading the consumer as to standard of fill under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, has said that the

standard is not whether experts or men of peculiar training, experience, shrewdness, or sophistication would be misled, but that the

standard is whether the container would be likely to mislead the

ordinary purchaser, not one who is particularly attentive or prudent.8 Thus, the courts have recognized the fact that statements on

the label of a consumer package are not always adequate to prevent

consumer deception.

It has been alleged that no foreign country places limitations on

the size containers in which distilled spirits may be packaged.

While Ave do not consider this in any way material to the issues

involved in this hearing, we do challenge the accuracy of the state- ment.

We do know, for instance, that by law in Italy acquaviti (distilled

spirits) must be bottled only in containers of a capacity of 0.1 liter,

0.25 liter, 0.5 liter, 0.75 liter, 1.0 liter, 1.5 liters, and 2.0 liters. Under

the weights and measures law of the Federal Republic of Germany,

hard liquors may be bottled only in containers of the following

capacities: less than 0.125 liter, 0.2 liter, 0.25 liter, 0.35 liter, 0.5 liter,

0.7 liter, 1.0 liter, 1.5 liters, 2.0 liters, 3.0 liters, and 5.0 liters. Canada,

of course, controls the size containers of distilled spirits offered for

sale in that country through its provincial liquor store setup, and

an examination of the listings in the several Provinces discloses that

Canadian whiskey is offered only in 12-ounce and 25-ounce bottles

in the Provinces of New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland, Ontario, Manitoba, Alberta, British Columbia, and Yukon

Territory. Some of the remaining four Provinces also offer Canadian whiskey in 10- and •AO-ounce containers.

While Great Britain has not yet standardized containers for distilled spirits, at least it has made a move in that direction. For instance, in 1919 the British Board of Trade appointed a committee to

review existing weights and measures and their administration "and

to make recommendations for bringing them into line with presentday requirements." After exhaustive study, this committee, in a voluminous report presented to Parliament at the command of King

George VI in May 1951, said:

We are, moreover, of the opinion that the interests of the puhlic would be more adequately safeguarded, and that the recognized practices of the trade

would not be disturbed by a further requirement that certain drinks of widespread consumption should be sold when in bottle, in specified and well-differentiated quantities only.

While, as stated in the beginning, we do not consider economic

considerations as basic issues in last year's hearings, we think it un- ; necessary to state that the Distilled Spirits Institute is vitally con- cerned with the economic welfare of its members. However, we

believe the adoption of the odd sizes advocated by the proponents,

or any of them, would result in economic detriment to the industry

rather than in economic betterment. The consumer would ultimately

have to bear the additional costs represented by the costs of additional bottling equipment to the bottler, and the costs of additional

8 U.S. v. 116 Boxes, etc., 80 F. Supp. 911.

22
inventories, space, and handling by (he bottler, the wholesaler, and

the retailer. The cost in loss of consumer goodwill would be incapable of measurement until the damage had been done.

While proponents allege that the suggested off-sizes might replace

certain standard sizes, the facts of economic life would preclude any

such total substitution. So long as one producer markets any specific,

container, competition will force other producers to supply that size

container.

"We need standards in our society because our way of life compels

us to be individualistic. We demand free competition. We demand

the right to adjudge our laws in the way in which we view them.

But, being civilized, we acknowledge our own shortcomings of intellect and judgment and we accept the fact that there are moral

standards over and above our own view of looking at them. We

actually give away part of ourselves when we conform to the dictates

of a democratic society. We do not necessarily agree with all the

rules laid down by a majority of our political representatives, but

we nonetheless conform to them because we know that that sacrifice

is made to perfect a nobler good, a better society ; and thereby we

improve our mode and manner of living. While we give a little of

ourselves, we do not subject ourselves to the tyranny found behind

the Iron Curtain.

The United States of America was created out of the torment of

tyranny. It subsequently became composed of heterogeneous peoples

with a common purpose : Freedom.

While it aimed for liberty in the structure of its society, it did not

seek license. Its peoples agreed upon common rules of social and

commercial intercourse. They agreed to standards in terminology,

to methods of doing business, and they also agreed to disagree in

many cases in philosophical, religious, and business concepts. But

they agreed—agree today—to disagree in harmony, but to agree also

to basic verities recognized by all. They set forth the highest standards of civilization ever before Avitnessed.

In World War I, our Government recognized the need to preserve

essential raw materials such as iron, coal, steel, and glass. It immediately issued orders for standardization of packages in order to conserve these materials.

After World War I and the seeming decline of the necessity of

preserving critical and strategic materials, we went back to free

enterprise and heterogeneous packaging.

Meanwhile, producers of consumer goods, always in tough competition, recognized the values of prepackaging, and more and more of our commodities began to appear in prepackaged form. To mention

but a few, milk, butter, lard, and sugar, and whisky too. The packaged commodity is now the staple of the supermarket. So packaging

became the commercial art of the thirties.

Then once again came another world war—the second. And again

the Government became concerned with raw materials and imposed

hundreds, if not thousands, of standards, both in manufactured and

packaged materials.

When the necessities of calamity, siich as war, dictate, we become

prudent and economical with o\ir resources. When Ave become in23
dolent with largesse, our competitive system forces a spendthrift way

of life which wastes our resources. The distilling- industry was fortunate in being re-created. It compelled the attention and scrupulous thinking of government officials as to what would be the rules governing the industry.

These officials laid down standards of packaging which still hold

after 27 years. They were devised for the protection of the public.

They were agreed to by the industry. And the major part of the

industry today wants them continued. This is admittedly selfinterest, but self-interest is vital to a sensitive industry. And I am

grateful that our member firms recognize that fact.

If these remarks seem a little critical of our free enterprise system, they are not so designed. They are meant only to deal with the

facts of our economic life. Our industry is dedicated to the competitive system and completely opposed to monopoly, which is the

forerunner of socialism—merely a term for communism.

In concluding this paper, I have two general comments

1. Honest packaging is a moral obligation on the part of

manufacturers.

2. Packaging in well-defined standard sizes is essential to

the preservation of our free society.

In connection with paragraph 1, packaging that gets away from

multiples or binary submultiples of a unit is frequently a designed

deception of the public.

As to paragraph 2, standardization of sizes in all consumer items

is necessary for two reasons.

First, nonstandardized consumer packages will fool the people for

only so long, and will in time generate a distrust for packaged commodities. This will, in turn, generate a distaste for American busi- ness practices and lead to ever more governmental intervention and

ultimately the deep sleep and torpidity that comes from socialism.

The torpor of the subjects of socialist states is worse than honorable

death.

Secondly, mass consumer packaging practices that eventuate in

consumer disdain will, like prohibition laws, lead to a scornful public

disrespect so as to jeopardize confidence in American business itself.

And so they should.

We have been fortunate in our industry in having standards in

packages fixed by the Federal Government. But we recognize the

dangers that beset our industry by lack of standards in so many

commodities.

We know that you are truly dedicated to preserving American

business, often in spite of itself. Please accept from us our cordial

goodwill in the furtherance of your vital work.

ADDRESS OF CONFERENCE CHAIRMAN

By K. E. Meek, Director, Division of Weights and Measures, Board

of Health, State of Indiana

As the Chairman of the National Conference on Weights and

Measiu'es, it is my privilege to extend to each of you a cordial greet24
bag and, at the same time, to express the hope that this, the 46th

meeting of our organization, will prove to be one of the most outstanding and worthwhile in its nearly half a century of service in

the public interest.

It is not to be considered remarkable that the National Conference, an unofficial organization with no legal status and no authority to

enforce its recommendations, has been able to accomplish so much

in the entire held of commercial quantity determinations. The Conference is dedicated to the promotion of the principles of fairness,

impartiality, uniformity, and equity in all matters pertaining to

weights and measures administration; however, factors other than

dedication to worthwhile principles should be recognized in any discussion having to do with the success of the National Conference.

I believe that a number of these factors are of sufficient importance

that they should be named and briefly discussed.

To me, the greatest asset the National Conference can claim is the

fact that it was created and has been continually sponsored by the

National Bureau of Standards. The Bureau uses this means of discharging part of the responsibility under that portion of its organic

act which authorizes "Cooperation with the States in securing uniformity in weights and measures laws and methods of inspection."

Without the benefit of this sponsorship by the Bureau and its many

contributions in the way of administrative and technical guidance,

publication, and research, all of which we hope will be continued

and strengthened, there probably would not be a National Conference or, at best, a very weak and. ineffective one. Next to the contributions of the National Bureau of Standards to

the success of the Conference, I would rate the splendid cooperation

received from those engaged in the manufacture, servicing, and

operation of weighing and measuring devices, business organizations,

trade associations, governmental agencies, consumer groups, and

others interested in the objectives and activities of the Conference.

The participation of these interested individuals and groups is of

invaluable assistance to the Conference in arriving at sound, reasonable, and workable conclusions. It is to be recognized that differ- ences of opinion, seriously presented, may arise in seeking the proper

solution to any problem. These differences of opinion are respected,

and in no sense discouraged, by the Conference, as they present possibilities that, after careful study and consideration, are often

accepted.

The Conference could not be a success without the attendance and

active participation of a good representation of State and local

weights and measures officials. Conference officers and members of

committees have definite responsibilities that, in their proper discharge, require long hours of work over and above the individuals'

routine activities. The opportunities for weights and measures offi- cials to serve the Conference are many and, I might add, not limited

solely to attendance together with the voicing of approval or disapproval of the work done by others.

The National Bureau of Standards and the various organizations

and groups mentioned are "cogs in the machinery" of the Conference

that have proper places and responsibilities, that have worked tor gether objectively, and that, through mutual respect and cooperative

25
effort, have accomplished the greatest good for our entire citizenry.

However, as an organization, we must not "rest on our oars" on

the basis of past accomplishments, but instead should be ready to

meet, intelligently and successfully, the challenges that will confront

us in the future.

The observations I have made are based on my 28 years' experience

as a weights and measures official, my attendance during 20 National

Conferences, and the service I have been privileged to render as an

officer and as a member of various committees of the Conference. I

am pleased to have played a small part in the affairs of the Conference, particularly during the past year, to which I now will turn

my attention.

During the closing session of the 45th Conference, your Chairman

was directed to designate a special committee to study feasibility of

the Conference being held in locations other than the District of

Columbia. This committee, consisting of the five principal officers

elected from the active membership, developed a consensus of those

weights and measures officials who normally attend National Conferences. The report of this special committee will be presented to

the Conference later in this meeting.

During the past summer, the attention of the Conference was

called to an attempt that was being made to break down the established system of standard units for the sale of distilled spirits. The

first proposal made by a small segment of the distilling industry to

the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division, Internal Revenue Service,

was to eliminate all specific bottle sizes for distilled spirits. If

favorable action was not taken on this proposal, it was requested

as an alternative that the regulations be amended to add four additional sizes : namely, Vs gallon, % gallon, y12 gallon, and %0 gallon.

The Director of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax Division, Hon.

Dwight E. Avis, scheduled a hearing on this petition in Washington,

D.C., for July 27, 1961. In the meantime, a memorandum callingattention to the hearing and its purpose was sent to selected weights

and measures officials by your Chairman. As a result of this memorandum, approximately 100 officials sent letters to the Alcohol and

Tobacco Tax Division protesting the petition. In addition, several

Slate and regional weights and measures associations adopted reso- lutions pointing out that the granting of the petition would not be

in the best interests of the public.

Your Chairman was one of a group of four present and former

officials who attended the hearing and presented strong statements

opposing the granting of the petition. Others in this group were

T. C. Harris of Virginia, J. P. McBride of Massachusetts, and C. M.

Fuller of Los Angeles, California. We called attention to the position taken by the National Conference in the past on standardization

of package sizes and, in particular, on containers for alcoholic beverages. Our arguments were in the interest of standardization of

package sizes wherever this was feasible, and the continuation of

those standardization programs currently in effect. The point was

made and reflected the belief that the real need was for fewer rather

than more sizes.

It should be mentioned that, in addition to many other organizations, the Distilled Spirits Institute strongly opposed the granting

26
of the petition on the grounds that standardization of package sizes as currently in effect was in the best interests of all parties con- cerned—the distiller, distributor, retailer, and consumer. Robert W.

Coyne, President, Distilled Spirits Institute, was so favorably impressed with the position taken by weights and measures officials on

the importance of package standardization that he kindly accepted an invitation to discuss the subject during this Conference.

Your Chairman was privileged to attend a number of State and

regional weights and measures conferences during the year and, upon

four occasions, spoke on the topic "The National Conference on Weights and Measures—Its Purposes and Policies." These conferences were sponsored by the following weights and measures asso- ciations: Western, Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan. Many present at

these meetings had never attended a National Conference and, therefore, had only a limited knowledge of the working arrangements of our organization.

Interim meetings of the National Conference Committees on

Specifications and Tolerances and on Laws and Regulations were

held at the National Bureau of Standards and the Sheraton-Park

Hotel during the week of January 30. These committees held both

public hearings and executive sessions. The Committee on Specifications and Tolerances held its meetings on Monday and Tuesday,

and the Committee on Laws and Regulations met on Thursday and

Friday. A joint meeting of the two committees was held on Wednesday. The public hearings were arranged for the purpose of giving all interested parties an opportunity to express their views prior

to drafting, during the executive sessions, the tentative reports of

the two committees.

It was my privilege as Conference Chairman to be invited to at- tend all meetings of the two committees and to offer any suggestions

that I thought might prove helpful. I am, accordingly, better informed on the many recommendations of the two committees con- tained in the two tentative reports. As a result of this experience

and what I believe to be its value to the presiding officer of the

Conference, I recommend that similar invitations be extended to

future Conference Chairmen.

I feel that it is in order to compliment all members of the two

committees for their serious and untiring efforts to arrive at sound

and reasonable tentative reports. To the other weights and measures

officials and industry representatives attending the public hearings,

I would like to voice the appreciation of the Conference for the

helpful and considered expressions of their views. Even though it was not always possible to arrive at a unanimity on all matters discussed, it must be remembered that it is better to have any divergent

or conflicting views expressed and to have these carefully studied

and considered before arriving at either tentative or final recommendations.

Now that weights and measures officials, with the helpful assistance

of the National Conference, industrial organizations, and various

associations, have sponsored three "National Weights and Measures

Weeks," I suggest that the results achieved be given careful study

to determine whether or not the celebration of the "Week" should

be continued as a permanent Conference sponsored educational effort.

613254—61^—3 27
Much can be said in favor of the "Week," but there are those who

question the advisability of concentrating our major educational

efforts during one week of each year. Some are of the opinion that

the advantages of celebrating "Weeks" are being dissipated due to

the large number of organizations, apparently on the increase, that

sponsor them. In one major city it was found that 12 different

organizations were celebrating the same week and, for this reason,

it was impossible to obtain official proclamations. Many have ex- pressed the view that more favorable results would be obtained by

periodically providing weights and measures officials with copies of

prepared addresses, newspaper articles, and scripts for radio and

television presentations. Regardless of our individual thinking on

this question, I am of the opinion that it is one that merits careful

consideration by the Conference.

This year, for the first time, the Conference is sponsoring a lunch- eon instead of the usual evening party. We have been fortunate in

securing Hon. Philip A. Hart, U.S. Senator from the State of Michigan, to address us on this occasion. We hope that everyone registerino- for the Conference will attend this social affair scheduled

on Wednesday.

In conclusion, I want to voice my sincere appreciation for the

splendid cooperation I have received from the officers and members

of the National Conference while serving as your Chairman during

the past year. In particular, I want to acknowledge the untiring

efforts expended by your Secretary, Mr. Bussey, and members of his

staff in looking after the interests of the Conference throughout the

year as well as in handling the countless details in connection with

the arrangements for and the program of this meeting. I am sure

their efforts will result in making this, the 46th National Conference on Weights and Measures, a most informative and outstanding

meeting. As an expression of our appreciation of this courageous

and effective leadership and to exemplify our sincerity of purpose

toward national uniformity and efficiency in weights and measures

administration, let us, in our respective jurisdictions, rededicate our

lives and actions to the moral support, legal adoption, and effective

enforcement of the various Conference recommendations.

SECOND SESSION—MORNING OF WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1961

(J. W. D. Hakvey, Vice Chairman, Presiding)

REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION

Presented by J. F. True, Chairman, State Sealer, Division of

Weights and Measures, State Board of Agriculture, State of Kansas

1. Publication of Conference Recommendations.-—-As the result of

a suggestion of the Conference Committee on Specifications and

Tolerances, the Committee on Education presents for Conference consideration a plan whereby certain recommendations of the

Conference may be formalized and published for general distribution.

The first area in which the plan is proposed is in device selection,

installation, and maintenance.

28
Ii is suggested that such Conference recommendations be reproduced on paper of Handbook 44 size and punched for looseleaf

binder use. If the plan is accepted, the Conference will request the

National Bureau of Standards to undertake the mechanical operation

of preparation for and publication of the recommendations in number sufficient to provide each interested jurisdiction with a few

copies. Freedom to republish is explicit in the plan.

The committee recommends the adoption of the plan of official

recommendtaions and the first such recommendation covering the

selection, installation, and maintenance of vehicle scales, as follows

SELECTION. INSTALLATION, AND MAINTENANCE OF VEHICLE SCALES

A Recommendation of the National Conference on Weights and Measures

I. Selection

1. A basic consideration in the selection of a scale is compliance with an

adequate specification. Scales in commercial service are subject to inspection

and test by constituted weights and measures regulatory authorities. In the

majority of jurisdictions in the United States, the codes of specifications, tol- erances, and regulations adopted by the National Conference on Weights and

Measures have been promulgated.1 It follows that the purchaser of a scale

intended for commercial service should do no less than to specify compliance

with the National Conference codes, and that the purchase contract should

include a warranty by the seller that the scale furnished will conform fully

to all applicable weights and measures requirements of the jurisdiction where

it is to be installed. In the case of a scale to be purchased for noncommercial

service (and so not subject to official controls), the same minimum requirement is recommended as for commercial scales, to the end that a satisfactory

weighing machine may be obtained. If a scale is to be operated under unusually rigorous service conditions, or if other special or unusual demands will

be made upon it, a competent scale engineer should be consulted ; if it is found necessary to prescribe special requirements beyond the minimum re- quirements encompassed by the National Conference codes, these should be

carefully worked out and explicitly set forth in the purchase contract for the

scale.

2. When selecting a particular scale, careful consideration should be given

to (a) weighing capacity, (b) platform dimensions, and (c) the character of

the indicating elements. In this relation, thought should be given not only to current needs, but also to needs anticipated for the succeeding 10 years or so. (a) With respect to weighing capacity, it will probably be found to be eco- nomical in the long view to choose a scale with a nominal capacity of 20 per- cent or more in excess of the actual anticipated weighing requirements. This

will promote longer life of scale parts, will be conducive to uninterrupted

weighing service and reduction of maintenance expense, and will tend to avoid

early obsolescence of the scale because of inadequacy of capacity to meet unanticipated weighing demands.

(b) It is contrary to good commercial weighing practice, as well as to a

regulation of the National Conference Scale Code, to attempt to determine the

total weight of a highway vehicle by weighing it one end or one axle at a time and adding the results. A value so derived may be seriously inaccurate.

The same is true in the case of coupled vehicle combinations—for example,

tractor-trailer units—when the several elements of the combination are indi- vidually weighed without first being disconnected from other elements of the

1 These codes are currently published In looseleaf form in National Bureau of Standards

Handbook 44, 2d Edition, and are kept up to date—that is, in conformity with the decisions

of the National Conference—through the medium of replacement sheets Issued annually.

Copies of the handbook (including replacement sheets) may be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents. U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington 25, D.C. Upon his request, a purchaser of Handbook 44 will be supplied, without cost, with subsequent re- placement sheets as these are issued.

29
combination. The length of a vehicle scale should be adequate to accommodate in its entirety the longest vehicle or vehicle combination that it is pro- posed to weigh on the scale. Since it is usually expensive and may prove to be unsatisfactory to undertake modification of an installed scale to increase

its length, it is urged that, when deciding upon the length of a new scale, a

liberal allowance be made over immediate needs to care for future developments. For vehicle scales, a platform length of at least 50 feet is recom- mended unless it is known that needs will be restricted to the weighing of

relatively short-wheelbase vehicles. Scales of 60 feet, 100 feet, or even more

in length are practical and are to be recommended when warranted by the

character of the loads to be weighed. A minimum platform width of 10 feet

is also recommended.

(c) The relative advantages and limitations of manual (weighbeam) and

automatic means for indication of weight values, and the desirability or need

for weight registration on tickets, tapes, and the like, should be carefully

evaluated.

Purchasers of scales intended for either commercial or noncommercial service will be well advised to avoid the false economy of sacrificing quality fol- low initial cost. A good scale, well installed and carefully maintained, will more than justify its cost by its long life and accurate weighing performance.

II. Installation (Whenever, in what follows, reference is made to specific elements—as, for example, lever systems, load cells, weighbeams—the comment re- fers only to those scales that incorporate such elements.)

The vigilance of the purchaser may not safely be relaxed even when an

excellent scale has been selected, since, if the scale is not properly installed,

it may fail to produce the results of which it is susceptible—its weighing

performance may be seriously inaccurate or may shortly become so, and it may deteriorate rapidly in service. Installations poorly planned or unskillfully executed too often result in new scales being turned over to their owners in improper or inaccurate condition. The purchaser will, therefore, do

well to see to it that the following basic requirements are adhered to:

1. Site: The location of the scale should be such that smooth, straight, hardsurface approaches, level with the scale platform, may be provided for a reasonable distance (at least as long as the platform, if practicable) at each

end of the scale, that surface water will drain away from the scale pit, and

that nonweighing traffic need not go over the scale platform.

2. Installation Supervision: The entire installation should be made under

the supervision of a competent scale erector, preferably an employee of the

scale manufacturer, so that responsibility for the final accuracy of the scale

and the suitability of the entire installation may be centered in a single agency.

3. Scale Pit: For proper scale maintenance—that is, protection against damage and deterioration of the scale parts and assurance of a continuance of

accurate weighing performance—it is imperative that there be periodic cleaning and inspection of the understructure of the scale and, on occasion, that

servicing operations and repairs be made to scale parts. For these reasons

it is necessary that adequate room be provided so that an inspector or a repairman may move about the pit freely. Accordingly, the pit should be

deep enough and access thereto should be such as to facilitate inspection,

cleaning, and maintenance of scale parts.

Pit walls and floor, and piers for lever stands, should be of good quality concrete and should be poured as a unit. Adequate means should be provided for pit drainage and ventilation.

4. Scale Elements in the Pit: All stands should be set directly on concrete without intervening supports, and should be securely anchored in correct

position.

All parts of the scale should be so positioned as to bring them into proper

relation with each other, with adequate working clearances around all live

parts.

All levers or load cells should be installed accurately level and in proper

alinement.

All bearing assemblies, connections between levers, the steelyard rod, the

beam rod, and all other parts designed to be plumb, should be installed in accurate vertical alinement.

30
The pivots and bearings of the main levers and extension levers should be

well packed with grease, to protect these parts against corrosion. Pivots and

bearings of shelf levers, weighbeams, and of any extension or reversing levers

installed between the transverse extension lever and the weighbeain or dial

should be protected only by the film of oil remaining after these parts have

been wiped with an oily (but unsaturated) cloth. Grease or an excessive

amount of oil on these parts will affect the sensitiveness of the scale—that is, its response to small changes in platform load.

5. Weighbridge: The weighbridge should be of steel, adequately strong, and

suitably braced for rigidity, and should include steel members providing adequate support for the platform. Adequate working clearances should be pro- vided around the weighbridge.

Checking means should be provided and should be designed, installed, and

adjusted to prevent excessive weighbridge movement without interfering with

necessary weighbridge freedom during weighing operations. Ball or roller checks should be well packed with grease.

All structural steel should be painted to protect the metal against corrosion.

15. Platform: The platform should be of adequate strength and should be

weathertight. The surface should be reasonably smooth and in surface alinement with the pit coping.

The opening between platform and coping should be established at approximately one-half inch at traffic level, and the edges of the platform should be

undercut slightly to prevent lodgment of foreign matter between platform and

pit wall.

7. Indicating Elements: The indicating elements should be adequately protected from the weather.

The weighbeam or automatic-indicating elements should, if practicable, be

so positioned as to avoid the use of added extension levers between indicatingelements and the normal lever system, and the installation should be so ar- ranged as to afford the weighmaster an unobstructed view of the entire platform.

Indicating elements should be installed level and plumb, and should be rigidly mounted upon firm foundations, preferably a part of the walls of the pit

neck, but in any event independent of the scale house, weighing room, or other

similar structure. A weighbeam should be horizontal when its tip is at the

midpoint of its travel in the trig loop.

Adequate clearances should be provided around the indicating elements and

the connections thereto.

8. Inspection and Test: During the progress of the installation, inspections

should be made to insure compliance with specification and installation re- quirements.

When the installation is completed, final inspection should be made and the

scale should be tested for accuracy and sensitiveness, "acceptance" requirements being applied. The test should, if practicable, be carried up to the

nominal capacity of the scale, and in any event should be carried to that point

in the weighing range corresponding to the largest gross load expected to be

weighed on the scale. The testweight load utilized should be as large as

practicable up to the nominal capacity of the scale. Observations should be

made at not less than three different test-weight loads. One or more strain

loads should be utilized in combination with the available test weights when

the amount of the test weights is less than the nominal scale capacity or the

maximum anticipated gross lading.

III.. Maintenance

In order to prevent rapid deterioration of parts, to keep the scale in good

mechanical condition, and to promote the continuance of accurate weighingresults, the following instructions should be observed.

1. Regularly clean the following: The scale pit. This should be maintained

in clean and dry condition.

The scale parts in the pit. When the protective grease around the pivots

and bearings of the lever system become hard and dirty, clear the old grease

away and repack the parts with fresh grease. All structural steel in the pit. Keep this well painted to protect the metal.

If rusting should start, thoroughly clean the metal before repainting.

The scale platform. Prevent all accumulations of dirt or foreign matter on

or around the platform.

31
2. Scale Platform: Keep the surface in good repair.

Maintain an opening of approximately one-half inch between the coping and

the edges of the platform.

Maintain surface alinement between the coping and the traffic surface of the

platform.

3. Scale Approaches : Maintain in hard and smooth condition and in surface

alinement with the scale coping.

4. Indicating Elements: Keep weighbeam notches and poises clean, and maintain weighbeam bars and face plates in clean and legible condition.

Keep automatic-indicating elements clean.

Keep dash pots properly filled and adjusted in strict conformance with the I instructions of the manufacturer of the automatic-indicating device or attachment.

Handle all indicating elements with care, to avoid breakage of or damage

to parts.

5. General: Keep the scale in correct zero-load balance, with any loose bal- ancing material securely enclosed.

Do not overload the scale. A vehicle scale is not well suited for precision weighing of gross loads of

less than 1,000 pounds.

Keep indicating elements locked except when in actual use. To prevent in- ordinate wear of zero notch of weighbeam, the main poise should be positioned I indiscriminately near the tip of the weighbeam when the scale is not in use. Arrange for periodic inspection of the scale by a competent scale mechanic.

If scale parts become damaged or broken, arrange for prompt renewal or suitable repair by a competent scale mechanic.

Do not authorize or permit the grinding of pivots in the field ; such work

should only be performed in a scale shop furnished with the necessary spe- cialized tools and equipment.

Contact the State or local weights and measures agency for additional in- formation regarding the selection, installation, and maintenance of vehicle

scales.

2. National Techni-cal Training Sclwols for Instructors in Weigh fx and Measures Supervision.—Early in February the Office of Weights

and Measures of the National Bureau of Standards announced that

it would conduct a special technical training school for instructors , in weights and measures supervision. The announcement noted that

the size of the class would be severely limited and that, the considerations being equal, students would be accepted in the order that

their applications were submitted.

Thirteen weights and measures supervisors from as many States,

11 representing State jurisdictions and 2 from large city jurisdictions, assembled on Monday, March 20, in the new training laboratory of the Office of Weights and Measures. Your Education Committee Chairman was one of those students.

Those in attendance were offered a full week of intensive training

in subjects embracing the broad field of Aveights and measures supervision, with special emphasis on the training aspects. There were

lectures, demonstrations, discussions, practice teaching, and examinations—both oral and written. Even the evening hours were occu- pied with study assignments and lively discussions among the

students.

Although the majority of the presentations were by staff members

of the Office of Weights and Measures, excellent lectures were delivered by especially qualified individuals from the universities in

Washington.

Every man who attended the course and earned the coveted certificate was more than enthusiastic about the content, the presentations, and the fellowship.

32
The Committee on Education commends the Office of Weights and

Measures and the National Bureau of Standards on this most worthwhile project. It is the firm opinion of this committee that every

State and every large local jurisdiction should have on its staff at

least one man who has undergone this intensive training. This will

lead not only to greater efficiency within the jurisdiction, but also to

greater conformity nationally.

It is the understanding of the committee that the Bureau will

schedule additional courses of this type as the demand is indicated.

The committee, therefore, urges weights and measures administrators

from throughout the Nation to write to the Bureau and arrange for

participation of key personnel in a technical training course of this

nature.

3. Resolutions on Term "Consumers' Protection.''1—During the 44th

National Conference two resolutions concerning the use of the term

"Consumers' Protection" were introduced by delegates from Connecticut. These were referred to the Committee on Education. During the open hearing on Tuesday both resolutions were withdrawn

by the delegates who originally introduced them.

4. Household Weights and Measures Card.—The committee has ex- plored the use by weights and measures officials of the National Bureau of Standards publication identified as "Household Weights and

Measures." Under the plan offered by the Bureau, it is practicable

for individual weights and measures agencies to reproduce and distribute this as a publication of their own agency. Identification of

the distributing agency is accomplished in a simple manner by inserting in the space provided the appropriate information. The

committee has viewed several examples of such reproductions and is

impressed with their value as an educational and public relations

tool.

Weights and measures officials are urged to take advantage of this

offer and obtain from the National Bureau of Standards at no cost

master copies designed for photo-offset reproduction and the insertion

of whatever material it is desired be inserted for agency identification.

5. Appreciation to Subcommittee Chairmen.—For each of the past 2

years the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Public Education and

National Weights and Measures Week has devoted his time and his

talents, unselfishly, to the promotion and coordination of activities

associated with National Weights and Measures Week. As everyone

connected with weights and measures is aware, the results were outstanding.

As Chairman of the Committee on Education, I feel that the Conference should show its appreciation to Mr. J. E. Bowen of Newton,

Massachusetts, and Mr. Carl H. Stender of South Carolina, for the

fine service they have rendered by extending to them a rising vote of

thanks, and I so move.

(A standing ovation was given to Mr. Bowen and Mr. Stender.)

33
During the year the committee has profited by the suggestions

made and the cooperation rendered by weights and measures offi- cials from throughout the United States, and of representatives of

the trade, and takes this opportunity to register its appreciation

therefor.

J. F. True, Chairman

J. E. Bowen"

H. E. Crawford

W. A. Kerlin

C. H. Stender

W. S. Bussey, Secretary

(The report of the Committee on Education was adopted by voice vote.)

REPORT OF SUBCOMMITTEE ON PUBLIC EDUCATION AND NATIONAL

WEIGHTS AND MEASURES WEEK

Presented by C. H. Stender, Chainnan, Assistant to Commissioner,

Department, of Agriculture, State of South Carolina

I am sure I experienced the same reaction to National Weights

and Measures Week as the chairmen who preceded me. When the

preliminaries are closed, you wonder if any steps were overlooked.

If your immediate area lacked expected publicity, you wonder if

that is the picture nationwide. I am quite sure this is the experience

of all State chairmen and area coordinators.

I must admit the experience as chairman was rewarding. Frankly,

it is too broad a program for any one person to explore all the

potentials that can make the campaign much more successful. This

is the point that I decided to discuss with you, rather than enumerate

a great number of figures as to stickers, seals, resolutions, proclamations, newspaper, and other forms of publicity.

However, I feel I should mention that all 50 States and the District of Columbia were contacted and supplied promotional material.

Forty-three States reported from average to exceptional success with

their programs. Twenty-five city and county jurisdictions also re- ported. I know there were many, many more than these 25, but

these reported through their State headquarters. These reports

graded from the "same experience in past years'' to "decided increase

in public interest."

Personally, I was impressed with several new additions to the

program—the small 1-inch pressure seals, the resolutions by General

Assemblies, the increased use of the emblem in newspapers, and the use of the emblem by one dairy company on milk cartons that cov- ered parts of Montana, Idaho, Oregon, and the State of Washington.

I was disappointed by some failures at the national level which

appeared sure-fire possibilities up to the last minute. Could I have

concentrated on these projects, I believe one or more would have

participated in the Week's observance.

I am sure the next national chairman will face the same problems

that are still fresh in my memory. Recently I read what is known

as a "snapshot sermon." It said, "A lot of good could be done in the

Avorld if nobody cared who got the credit." National Weights and

Measures Week is certainly a tremendous job, and frankly I found

34
every cooperator more llian willing' to contribute his or her part

without any thought other than the "good of all."

We have completed four of these annual programs. The momentum has been generated, and it is my belief that general publicity

guide material is known to all State chairmen and their cooperators

throughout the individual States. Maybe we can relieve that next

chairman of devoting so much time to furnishing guide material

which every one of us should have in our permanent files. If the

national chairman can be relieved of a great deal of detail, he can

concentrate on developing national publicity.

This year the national chairman had the help of four area co- chairmen. These chairmen averaged about 13 States, and I am sure

t hey added links in the chain to bring the State's 51 chairmen closer

to national headquarters. It is a pleasure to pay respect and thanks

to committee members Bill Kerlin, Fred True, Howard Crawford,

and 1960 national subcommittee chairman, Ellis Bowen, for a fine

ball-carrying job in the backfield.

This was a modest attempt to overcome the time element involved

in distributing mail on a nationwide basis. It is my belief we could

increase the effectiveness of our program with a larger numer of area

coordinators. I would recommend this as a consideration for the

1962 chairman.

Many observance weeks, and let me say there are many, have more

active promoters in one State than we have throughout the 50 States.

This is not sour grapes, but rather a wish that we could be equally

fortunate. We have, in my estimation, a far-reaching activity which

touches every man, woman, and child in this nation and throughout

the entire world. Our publicity program is 4 years old, it is purely

voluntary, and it has no paid publicity employees. With only a

4-year history, it is my opinion we have clone a remarkable job.

According to general information, we have approximately 3,500

weights and measures officials. I have flirted with the idea that, if

each of these officials would contribute $1 to the National Conference

Committee on Education, we could publish a pamphlet of wellplanned suggestions to help each official plan his promotion of the

Week. Charlie Tooker of Rochester has given this matter quite some

study and has come up with the information that such a pamphlet

could be published for about 50 cents a copy. This project would

require some professional preparation, and the other 50 cents would

cover this cost. I offer this as some future thinking for the Committee on Education and the National Conference.

I would also suggest that all of us give more attention to the yearround publicity and not depend entirely on a "once-a-year shot in the

arm." Certainly we now have the entree to local news media, and,

if my State is an example, radio, TV, and newspapers welcome news

from all public services. Their franchise requires that they devote a

definite number of hours or space to such services.

I want to express my sincere appreciation to all who contributed

to the 1961 Week. I believe many gave unstintingly of their time

and efforts, though their activities never came to my personal attention. Besides self-satisfaction, I hope you are materially rewarded

by the public's appreciation of your importance to equity in trade

practices.

35
I also want to thank industry for its continued and increasing help

toward observance of the Week—the Scale Manufacturers Association and the many individual member companies, the Gasoline Pump

Manufacturers Association, the American Petroleum Institute, the

National Association of Dairy Equipment Manufacturers, the Consumer Councils, and the chain and independent stores; also the National Scale Men's Association, and, right here in our own family,

the Honorable L. H. Hodges, Secretary of Commerce; Dr. A. V.

Astin, Director of the National Bureau of Standards; Dr. A. T. McPherson, Associate Director of the National Bureau of Standards;

W. S. Bussey, our Secretary; and Bollin Meek, our National Conference Chairman.

I want to mention one more. I deeply regret he is not here to

receive our thanks. The passing of Mark Pickell of the Scale Journal lessened our ranks by one who deeply appreciated weights and

measures. He gave the initial impetus to our 1961 Week with the

January issue of the Scale Journal devoted to the importance of

weights and measures in our daily life. It was my privilege to Avork

with Mark Pickell on this issue, and his enthusiasm, although he was

not a well man at the time, is one of the fond memories I have of

an all-too-short friendship.

The program of observing Weights and Measures Week has 52

competitive weeks with a great number of overlapping competitors

vying for top billing each week. Personally, I would welcome more

national recognition to give added import to the local publicity.

However, we should not concentrate all our efforts toward national

recognition, because our local programs are the opportunities to introduce local officials to the public they serve. I am convinced that the more spotlight we put on the services of

weights and measures, the more diligent and intelligent we will become to perform our services. The more important our duties become to the public, the more important they become to the governments which the public select to administer their welfare. In gaining public appreciation, we gain government recognition. To gain

both is to upgrade ourselves from the status of a jobholder to members of a recognized profession. It is equally important that our

industrial associates, both in the field of providing weights and

measures equipment and in consumer marketing, share our problems

with each other, in order that we may move forward with mutual

recognition of our allied responsibilities to the society we serve. On behalf of the Committee on Education, I earnestly request that

all of us extend to the 1962 chairman and his coordinators full co- operation in their endeavors next year toward a bigger and better

observance of Weights and Measures Week in these United States.

In closing, I am grateful for the experiences of the 1961 Week.

To each one of you here and to many others throughout the United

States, I ofFer my sincere thanks. To have been associated with you

in promoting 1961 National Weights and Measures Week was a

privilege I shall hold dear in my memory of the tremendous impact

that the National Bureau of Standards, the National Conference,

and you and I contribute in serving the public.

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor, the report

of the Committee on Education as a whole, including the tentative report, as

36
amended by the final report, and the report of the subcommittee chairman for

National Weights and Measures Week, was adopted.)

PACKAGE LABELING

By J. L. Litti.f.fteld, Chief. Foods and Standards Division,

Department of Agriculture, State of Michigan

It is certainly a pleasure for me to attend this Conference and to

appear on the program. It certainly affords all of us from across

the Nation an opportunity- to promote uniformity in commercial

t ransactions.

Problems in prepackaging, as far as weights and measures are concerned, are always with us. With the progress being made in

marketing and the trends toward prepackaging of just about every

item we consume, Ave will very likely be continually faced with neAv

problems in weights and measures in connection with prepackaged

commodities.

One of the major problems at the present time is misleading terms

in connection with the quantity declaration. The Model Law adopted

by this National Conference provides:

Any commodity in package form introduced or delivered into or received in

intrastate commerce shall bear on the outside of the package a definite, plain,

and conspicuous declaration of (1) the identity of the commodity; (2) the net quantity of the contents in terms of weight, measure, or count; and (3) the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor : Provided, That in connection with the declaration under clause 2, neither the

qualifying term "when packaged" nor any words of similar import, nor any

term qualifying a unit of weight, measure, or count (for example, "jumbo,"

"giant." "full," and the like) that tends to exaggerate the amount of com- modity in the package, shall be used.

Furthermore, section 28 provides that no commodity in package

form shall be so wrapped, nor shall it be in a container so made,

formed, or filled, as to mislead the purchaser as to the quantity of

the contents of the package, and the contents of the container shall

not fall below such reasonable standard of fill as may have been

prescribed for the commodity in question.

For quite some time the Foods and Standards Division in Michigan has been vitally concerned about the labeling and advertising

which attempt to mislead the public, especially as to the quantity of

contents. Furthermore, the conspicuousness of the labeling can be

criticized. On many containers the declaration of contents can be

found on the back of the cartons, in folds of wrappers, or almost any

place where it will not be found with ease. The consumer must

actually hunt for the declaration on many packages.

The old saying "Caveat Emptor" (let the buyer beware) is indeed

prevalent. Y\

Te find that some manufacturers reduce the product content without cutting the price or container size. Others apparently

give less product than specified on the package because of misleading

terms which are not representative of the quantity. As a graphic

example of this, consider the cartoon which appeared in various

publications recently about the bewildered husband who walked into

a drugstore and asked for a small tube of toothpaste. The druggist

handed him a package marked "Large."

"Wait a moment," he said, "I asked for 'small'—this is 'large.' "

37
"That's right sir," was the answer. "They come in three sizes

large, super, and giant. Large is the smallest we have!"

This problem has developed overwhelmingly since the tobacco

people came out with a king-size cigarette. This gimmick in advertising has caught on by leaps and bounds in other industries. We

went from the "king-size" cigarette to the "long gallon" to the "long

mile," and now to the "big gallon" in gasoline. Power became extra

power, and extra power became super extra power. "King size"

was getting small, so it became "SUPER king size." As time wore

on, even "super king size" got small and became a "giant size." The

quart became a full quart, a jumbo quart, and finally a giant imperial quart.

The pound is no longer an ordinary pound as we knew it years

ago. It is now a full pound. It appears that all these past years

the consumer has not been getting 16 ounces to the pound. In some

instances we will agree with this. And we can say the same thing

about the full quart.

Small, medium, and large are becoming a thing of the past. The

standard units of weights and measures are being warped beyond

recognition. They are being camouflaged by descriptive terms which

tend to deceive, mislead, and distort the actual meaning of true net

weight or measure. They want the consumer to believe that my

pound is bigger than your pound, and that my quart is a full quart

and the other manufacturer's is not.

The dictionary says that to deceive is to make a person believe as true something that is false. And it further says that to mislead

is to lead a person to think what is not so. It appears that manufacturers have wanted more money for their merchandise, but they

want the consumers to think they are getting more for their money.

Therefore, they are both misleading and deceiving.

Advertising agencies will admit that they found it necessary to

try to outgimmick one another, but that there are still just 16 ounces

to a pound. Recently we took one day's local newspapers and

clipped advertisements with such misleading terms and statements.

Following are examples of those taken from just one day's newspapers (one morning and one afternoon edition) : Giant size quart Queen size

Jumbo quart Giant imperial quart

Starter size Giant size full pound

Full quart Full 12 ounces

Full pound Full 14 ounces Big 2-ounce Sixteen full glasses

Giant package Home laundry size

Vz bigger than king size Extra large

King-size franks Longfellow

Large 52-ounce family size 96 ounces—that's 18 glasses

Large 21-ounce Huge

Jumbo 24-ounce can Large 22-ounce size

Giant chocolate bars Gigantic

Extra long Colossal

Tall 24-inch Big 13-oz. vacuum can Not regular 10-oz. but big Two big glasses

_ 12-oz. Giant economy size

Hi-boy King-size TV cookies

38
A law on our statute hooks prohibits any false weights or measures, stating that it is illegal to deliver less than (he quantity represented in any commodity. Further, our weights are based on net

weight, excluding wrappers and other material packed with an

article. The packing referred to includes not only wrappers that

may be included with the product, but also the weight of the container itself and any other outside package. For example, tea bags

packed in a carton—the statement of contents should deal with only

the net weight of the tea in the package exclusive of the tare weight

of the bags themselves and the box container.

Another problem is the matter of drained weight in place of the

total weight. An accurate method of computing such content must

he utilized. A number of methods have been suggested and some

USDA ami FDA standards provide for fill of container, but in some

instances the nature of the product itself may make modification of

methods essential.

The object of any quantity requirement is to convey accurate information of the quantity in the package. If this purpose is accomplished, the contents may be expressed in even a combination of terms.

In the exercise of this description, however, the manufacturer must

satisfy one comprehensive requirement and that is that the statement

be set forth in terms generally used and understood by consumers

to express quantity for that particular product.

However, such combination declarations on labels may get manufacturers into difficulty. We recently had occasion to investigate cans of pear halves. The label, in addition to declaring the contents

at one pound, said the container held four servings, but the con- sumer found only two halves. A statement that certainly would not

give an accurate expression of the quantity is "Four servings" or "Serves four." The question immediately comes to mind, "What is an average serving?" If the can contains only four halves, then you

know upon opening such a can that each consumer was to have one

half. However, before opening the can, what would you consider a "serving"? If the container said "four halves" and "four servings,''

and then contained only two halves, each serving would only be a quarter of one pear. I would still be hungry

!

Statements of numerical count should merely supplement the

recognized method of designating contents; however, it would cer- tainly be false when it is so misleading as to indicate four servings

and contain only two halves.

The ordinary buyer is guided to a considerable degree by a visual

appraisal of size by the comparative dimensions of a package. Few

take the trouble to read and compare quantity declarations. Manufacturers appear to be capitalizing on this knowledge of consumers'

purchasing habits by utilizing containers which apparently enhance

the size and hence the value of the commodity. Take soap and detergent packages as an example. Some may have a large container, but

within that container there may be a gift which doubtless has been

figured in the cost, and although the consumer is buying this product

and perhaps paying a higher price, she feels she is getting the largest size.

We recently made a survey on the weights and prices of soaps and

detergents. Fifteen brands were compared—the declared weight

39
against the net weight, the unit price, and the price per pound.

Note was made as to whether any gifts were included and the location of the weight declaration. All the packages were labeled "giant"

except two. All were labeled in various ways, and had identical

height and width, but varying depths. None had the contents declaration on the front panel. Nine of fifteen had fractional ounces in

the net weight. The highest cost per pound was 87.3 percent more

than the lowest.

At the 1955 National Conference, the Committee on Methods of

Sale of Commodities reported that such terms as jumbo, king size,

Texas pint, and others were subtle in their intent for what psychological effect they may have. Designations of this kind are quite in

the same category as the use of such terms as "full pound," which

often appears in advertisements of certain types of vendors merchandising such items as cakes, candy, and potato chips. Webster's dictionary defines the adjective word "jumbo" as "huge of its kind."

Obviously you cannot have a huge standard measure container. Such

containers either hold their declared rated capacity within the toler- ances permitted or they are not correctly marked.

While on the subject of potato chips and the subject of the con- fused housewife, it might be well to bring up the subject of the full

pound as encountered by our State in the metropolitan area of Detroit. On a project in conjunction with the city weights and measures division, we ran head on into the use of "full pound" on potato

chips. To begin, it would be well to relate the source of the problem

to further understand the manner in which this problem grew.

The potato chip industry in Michigan is dependent upon our local

potatoes to furnish the bulk of the raw material. However, as this

supply vanishes, the industry must seek other sources. They begin

by buying southern potatoes and follow the crops up as the warmer

weather comes north. They have also begun to purchase potatoes in

the West. From an economical standpoint, the price of potato chips

is lower when they use Michigan potatoes at about $2 a hundred

pounds. However, when they are using southern potatoes at $8 or $9 a hundred, including shipping, they must alter the size of packages and prices of their products.

They have solved this problem by leaving the bag without a weight

declaration. They use what is termed a saddle similar to an overlabel. On these saddles they mark the weights and prices and staple

them to the top of the packages. The saddles are printed locally or can be obtained very easily on short notice. Therefore, when some

of the competition comes up with an adjective to describe the contents, such as "full pound," the remaining companies fall in line to

maintain their sales, or they might even go the competition one

better, as one company did, and have saddles printed stating "Giant

Size Full Pound, 59^ Pound," "Giant Size Full Pound, 69^ Pound,"

and "Giant Size Full Pound, 79^ Pound." He was ready for any

and all challengers.

This problem is not confined to the potato chip industry, however,

as the use of the term "full pound" is now to be found in the sausage

industry. The term "full pound" was found on packages manufactured by various sausage dealers in the area. Their point was that

so many of their competitors had begun packaging a 12- and 14-

40
ounce package of the various luncheon meats and sausage products,

they should get their point across to the shopper that theirs conlained one pound of product rather than the smaller amount of 12

or 14 ounces. Therefore, they felt the term "full pound" was justified. The next logical step in this type labeling would be for the

competition to label theirs as "full 12 ounces" or "full 14 ounces."

Other items include cookies. We now have a "king-size TV

cookie." The question is whether it is a "king-size cookie" or a

cookie to eat while watching a "king-size TV program."

The products mentioned are not necessarily the only ones that are described with such misleading and deceptive terms, nor will they

be the last. The problem now is, Where can the line be drawn and

what is the solution?

Almost six years have passed and we have not been successful in

stamping out these misleading terms in promoting the sale of various

commodities. This type of misrepresentation is not confined to

Michigan, as I stated before—this is a nationwide problem. I think

we should all support the action of previous National Conferences

and take immediate action to prevent the continuance of such misleading labeling and advertising. We should voice our objections to

the misuse of such terms wherever possible. As a purposeful or- ganization meeting here this week, I urge that we unify ourselves

and leave this Conference with the full intent and purpose of stamping out the use of such misleading terms on a national scale. The

time for action is now. There is deceptive packaging, we know, and

too much of it. This evil will not depart automatically. Someone

has to dispel it, as Food and Drug Packaging stated early this year.

This magazine is to be complimented for the statements on the vital

problem of deception in its January 5, 1961, edition, which read

Packagers must police themselves as well as they can or risk Government

control, which would lean heavily toward packaging standardization. What

is needed is a bold approach to the problem—organization of a dynamic, fearless packaging association willing to stand up to outside interference, unafraid to slap its own members down when they breach business ethics or

propriety. This must be done in 1961 to preserve the independence, growth,

individuality, and full marketing value of packaging.

It is not only deception in the advertising gimmicks which at- tempts to whitewash consumers, but other means such as slack-filled

packages. The recent Federal case on "slack-filled" packages of

mints has been in the news for some time. The reopening of this case has brought about the question again as to what the term "slack

package" means under the FDC Act. The case involved the FDA

charge that the manufacturer was using cushioning material and

headspace to produce an elongated container which misled consumers into the belief that they were purchasing more mints than the

package actually contained. The manufacturer contended this was

necessary to protect the product.

The labeling must be honest. Some relatively unimportant factor

cannot be played up in big type, while more vital factors are relegated. Magnificent product illustration, commendable graphic design, brand and product name, instructions for use, and opening

directions seem to place the net contents declaration into obscurity.

A Michigan firm recently packaged "individual martinis." Each

drink was carefully mixed, embellished with an olive, covered with a

41
special plastic wrap, sealed to be spillproof, and then placed in a printed box with a styrofoam form to fit the shape of the cocktail

glass. It will become a bartender's nightmare if this idea gains

popularity. I wonder about the weights and measures official's task

in checking the contents of such a commodity without opening the

inside package ! There was no contents declared except one martini, and how are we to tell if the glass holds 3 or 4 ounces?

In September 1960 I forwarded to all weights and measures offi- cials in the United States copies of my correspondence with the

Federal Alcohol Tax Division regarding the use of such terms as "king size," "giant," and "big" in connection with the contents and

asked each jurisdiction to notify me if any action had been taken to

prevent such misleading labeling and advertising. Replies were

received from 10 States, 1 county, and 2 city jurisdictions. The

replies would indicate that the nationwide sentiment is toward elimination of such advertising and labeling practices. Following are

brief extracts from the replies:

. . . only plagued with "full pound" on baked goods. Prompt action eliminated this condition and prevented spread of such terms. In recent years have

attained enough notoriety to attract attention of printers and lithographers.

With their interest in protecting accounts, they have also disseminated proper

information to their clients.

. . . We, too, are quite interested in deceptive marking of prepackaged products. Our laws skirt the subject as to infer we may have the powers now

hut legal minds advise that we spell out these laws, if and when both per- sonnel and travel appropriations are provided.

. . . We are also interested in finding some way to attempt to stop labeling

and advertising which is misleading to the public, but so far we have not

made much progress.

. . . We certainly agree with you that labeling commodities in terms of

"king size," "big," "giant," and similar statements is in violation of the in- tention of State laws and action taken by the National Conference . . . We

have done some work ... to discourage this practice ; however, at the present

time we do not have sufficient law to correct it entirely. We will continue to discourage qualifying statements of weight contents so far as we are permitted

under our present law.

... I agree with the statements. I shall be very glad to assist you in this

endeavox*.

. . . Wholeheartedly approve and congratulate you on your action and ac- complishments in the instances where you have stopped these practices.

... As a result of your letter ... I made a field trip to survey the labeling

which you mentioned ... As a result of my findings, I have written to the

offenders ... I feel a concerted effort by a number of States will bring re- sults. Be assured we are willing to cooperate to the extent that our personnel and man hours will permit.

. . . We have recently established a package-control division and are very

active in the control of all our packages. ... I do not know of any problem that faces weights and measures that

would be more destructive than this one. I am wholeheartedly in agreement

with you that there should be unified action in regard to this subject on all commodities sold by weight and measure, particularly in the food field.

... I fully agree that the use of such terms is an attempt to mislead the

buying public into believing it is receiving more than it does. For this reason, some definite action should be taken to bring about a discontinuance of

the practice.

42
. . . Our department is new; therefore, we have not as yet delved too much

into the misrepresentations and malpractices of advertising. I am sure the

points brought out in your letter have merit, but I would refrain from making comments at the present time.

. . . The use of such terms . . . has been considered, to some extent, by

our department. Our attorney feels that the use of these terms is not a

direct violation of our weights and measures law. We all feel that, to some

extent, it is deceptive and that the terms should not be used, but our attorney

feels we would have a nearly hopeless case under our laws to stop the use

of them. We have been so busy stopping direct and unmistakable violations

of the law that we have not thought it worthwhile to go into such a matter

as this unless we had a law that directly prohibited such terms. We sympathize with what you ai- e trying to do and hope you are successful.

. . . We are statewide in operation and would like to say that over 60 per- cent of our time is devoted to keeping down violations of labeling and short

weight to a very low minimum.

To accomplish the objectives of the action officially adopted by

this National Conference in previous years, I feel weights and measures officials throughout the Nation should do whatever they can

within their respective jurisdictions to promote uniformity by bringing about the successful conclusion of any action adopted by members of the Conference. Of course, I realize that there is the

problem of some local ordinances, regulations, or laws preventing

action in a particular jurisdiction, but I definitely feel that Conference action should be given full consideration by all persons in

permissive jurisdictions.

If necessary, I would urge that the Conference restate the position taken in previous years as a means of emphasizing the intent

to eliminate misleading terms in advertising and labeling which

practically result in deceptive packaging.

There is room for great improvement in package labeling. The

significance of the words "conspicuously labeled" seems to have been

lost in the maze of product promotion to a point the consumers can

no longer easily determine how much of a given commodity they are

purchasing.

We sincerely appreciate the continued cooperation we receive from

officials in other States and assure you that we "will continue to do

our utmost to serve the people of our State and to protect the interests of all persons or firms doing business within our boundaries.

I close with this thought. There is not a job in the world that

cannot be done better than it is being done. A man is not doing the

best he can for the agency that employs him, the people he serves, or for the world if he goes through life without looking for that

better way.

DISCUSSION ON FOREGOING PAPER

Mr. Bowex: I would like to commend Mr. Littlefielcl for what I

consider a very able presentation of this troublesome problem that

we face today. I was particularly interested in his suggestion that

we as individuals can do something about it, and I think that we

can. Public opinion is quite a powerful force. We are in a very

advantageous position to nudge public opinion. In Massachusetts

we have done a little along this line.

Several months ago I wrote a letter to the local editors about this

problem. One of the local editors was impressed enough that he

said, instead of using it as a letter to the editor, he would like to

613254—61 4 43
make a special feature out of the letter and he played it up on the

front page of the newspaper.

We have been hearing about the pumping of hams. So I got busy

again and wrote more letters to editors about this matter, suggesting

that anyone could oppose this proposition by writing to the U.S.

Department of Agriculture. I was very fortunate, I think, in that

one of the newspapers that used this material was the Christian

Science Monitor, which has a national circulation, and I was pleased

to receive a comment from a lady in Pasadena, California, 3,000

miles away.

Mr. Baucom : You mentioned in your statement the matter of

reasonable fill. That word "reasonable" is very difficult to define.

Just before I left home, I received several complaints about reasonable fill. I would like to see more specific terms used in legal

documents.

Mr. Matt Jennings : For quite a number of years I have observed

and have been very much impressed by the efficient regulatory control you have in Michigan. I was interested in one particular state- ment and that was that, after 6 years of effort, you are still unsuccessful in your dealings with misleading terms.

In your experience in dealing with this problem, what would you

consider to be the major handicap—ineffective legislation, insufficient

coordination of enforcement among city, county, and State officials, or possibly the merchandising gimmicks and practices that may be

outside the realm of present legislation?

Mr. Littlefield : I think, Mr. Jennings, you have answered your

own questions in the order of their importance in our problem.

Mr. Christie: I would like to ask you to answer two questions.

In your research have you come across any State that has standards

other than those furnished or recognized by the United States? And

what kind of cooperation has been received by your organization

in doing away with such labeling when you bring it to the attention

of the packer?

Mr. Littlefield : The answer to your first question is no, I have

not. The answer to your second question is, basically we have had

very excellent cooperation, with the exception of the alcoholic beverage industry, particularly malt beverages. Our problem is that so many of the packages are in interstate commerce. They may originate clear across the country from us, and when we attempt to bring

about corrective actions the packers wonder why their own State or

local jurisdiction did not say something about it. This was the case of the corn which I mentioned in my formal comments.

Mr. Stender: In the last several weeks we have had some manufacturers bring in their packages and ask whether or not we would

approve them. They were slack-filled, and in our discussions we

asked the question if this was the desire of the manufacturer or whether that was the idea of the advertising concern that handles

their advertising. My question is, do you think that these slackfilled packages and deceptive packages are actually a real desire on

the part of the manufacturer or do you think or have you found that

the advertising companies are probably promoting the idea rather

than the manufacturer himself?

Mr. LiTTLEFiELn : First, Mr. Stender, I did not go into this in

great detail. I think there is a combination of factors here on the

44
part of both manufacturer and packager. It has been said that you

do not sell commodities, you sell packages. This bothers us some. But 1 think there is a combination of factors involving both the

packager and the advertiser.

PROGRESS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF MOISTURE IN GRAIN

By W. W. Walton, Chief, and W. C. Wolfe, Chemist, Organic Building

Materials Section, Building Research Division, National Bureau of

Standards

The amount of moisture in grain is important for two reasons.

First, the price of grain of a given quality is directly related to the

moisture content, and second, the deterioration of grain in storage

is dependent, principally, upon the moisture content, although other

factors are important. The major interest of this group is the first reason, the moisture-price relationship.

TVTiy is the determination of moisture in grain such a difficult

problem? One important reason is simply that only a few people

are willing to spend the time necessary to obtain an accurate result.

There is a more basic reason, however, and it can be illustrated by a simple example. Calcium sulfate may exist in the anhydrous state or with two molecules of calcium sulfate combined with one molecule

of water or with one molecule of calcium sulfate combined with two

molecules of water. TVe commonly refer to the latter two as Plasterof-Paris and gypsum, respectively. We cannot properly speak of

the gypsum as being diluted with water, because the material is not

gypsum unless it has the two molecules of water present. This is a simple case, because we have a single substance, calcium sulfate,

combined with water.

Grain, on the other hand, is not a single substance, but a complex

mixture of proteins, carbohydrates, oils, mineral matter, and other

substances. Each of these materials, such as proteins or carbohydrates, are in themselves mixtures and not single substances. And

finally, even a single pure protein has a very complicated structure

compared to calcium sulfate. The colloidal nature of these materials

makes it very difficult, if not impossible, to differentiate between true

moisture and water that is actually a part of the structure of the

grain.

Mother Nature adds one more artistic touch to this complex picture—some of these materials are unstable and yield water as one

of the products of decomposition.

The ideal solution of the problem would be to determine the

amount of water that is part of the structure of the grain and correct the determination of total water for it. Unfortunately, the

possibility of doing this is far off in the future. It is an extremely

difficult problem to solve.

Another method of solving the problem is to obtain general agreement on what shall be considered moisture. The Department of

Agriculture has done outstanding work in this field and their oven

methods for grain are specified in the Official Grain Standards of

the United States. These oven methods have been reinforced by

more recent work of the Department of Agriculture and others. The

moisture in the grain is extracted with solvent and the amount of

45
water in the solvent determined by titration with Karl Fischer re- agent. These results are used to confirm those obtained by oven

methods or may provide a basis for changing the oven methods.

Oven methods yield reproducible results when the standard procedures are followed precisely, but they are not too satisfactory for

field use. A great many workers have been trying to develop more rapid

methods that would be satisfactory for field use. It would probably

require several days to discuss all of these methods, and it is doubtful that such discussion would be very profitable.

Methods for the determination of moisture vary in principle from

something as old-fashioned as the acetylene lamp to something as modern as radar. Calcium carbide reacts with moisture to yield a

gas, acetylene, and the moisture content may be determined by

measuring the amount of acetylene formed. Loss in weight or the

pressure developed in a closed system may be used to obtain the

amount of acetylene. With respect to radar, it was noted in early

work with radar that signal strength was greatly reduced at times.

The cause was traced to high humidity of the atmosphere. If microwaves (radar) are allowed to pass through a material such as grain,

the energy loss is related to the amount of moisture in the grain.

Measurement of the loss of energy with dry grain and with grain

containing varying known amounts of water establishes a relationship which can be used to determine the moisture content of un- known samples.

With this background information in mind, a discussion of the

work at the National Bureau of Standards should be more meaningful. The development of an instrument that will sell for $50 that can be operated by a kindergarten student and give accurate results

on all types of grain does not appear to be imminent. It is hoped,

however, that a method can be developed that will yield accurate

results in the field with a reasonable consumption of time and re- quiring only a moderate amount of practice to become expert in its use.One of the methods investigated at the Bureau is nuclear magnetic

resonance. This is a rather complicated concept, but it is based

essentially on the fact that the hydrogen nucleus, the proton, as well

as many other atomic nuclei, possess an intrinsic angular momentum

or spin. If the material is placed in a magnetic field, the energyexchange properties related to this angular spin may be investigated.

These properties depend upon the other atoms with which the

proton is associated; that is, hydrogen present in paraffin can be

distinguished from hydrogen present in water. In fact, hydrogen

present in free water can be distinguished from hydrogen present in

strongly adsorbed water.

This method offers more promise as a research tool than as a practical field method. It is being investigated because the information

obtained may be helpful in the evaluation of other methods. Preliminary studies with wheat enabled samples of known moisture

contents to be arranged in the order of their moisture content and

duplicate samples to be identified as duplicates. More detailed studies are being planned for future work.

The cost of equipment for measuring nuclear magnetic resonance

4G
is high. A bargain instrument has recently been placed on the

market at $'2;),9f>0. However, an instrument designed for measuring

moisture in starch is priced at approximately $15,000. The instruments are also very heavy and large, and their use requires considerable training.

An example of the importance of this technique in research is some recent work done in London. The amount of water present in

the hydration shell of proteins was measured in a water solution.

The two types of water could be distinguished.

Another technique that has been considered by the Bureau is the

use of tritium, the radioactive isotope of hydrogen. If a known

amount of tritiated water were shaken with a known weight of grain,

the tritiated water would be diluted by the moisture in the grain.

The measurement of the concentration of tritium is a simple matter,

and hence the amount of dilution could be determined. The amount

of moisture in the grain could be readily calculated.

Unfortunately, calculations have shown that present methods for

the determination of tritium do not have the accuracy that would be

required to make this method applicable to the main problem. It

does seem possible that the method may have some research use in

studying the nature of moisture in grain. A definite time would be

required for free water in grain to come to equilibrium with the

tritiated water, and it seems plausible to reason that more tightly

bound water would require a longer time. A study of the rate of

dilution under controlled conditions should yield valuable information about the physical state of the water in the grain.

There is presently available a simple automatic device for the

determination of chloride, so the substitution of a sodium chloride

solution for the tritiated water suggested itself. A known amount

of a solution of sodium chloride when shaken with a known weight

of grain would be diluted by the moisture in the grain. Titration

with the automatic titrator would indicate the amount of dilution

and the percentage of moisture in the grain could be calculated.

Preliminary calculations indicated that the accuracy of the chloride

titrator was high enough to make the method feasible.

A few experiments were tried with samples of wheat, but equilibrium could not be established. The salt solution became more

saturated instead of more dilute. Apparently the grain was adsorbing water from the solution. The chloride ion present in the grain

itself was too low to have any measurable effect with the salt

concentrations that were used in these experiments.

Another method that was considered by the Bureau is based on bombardment of the grain with fast neutrons. These fast or highenergy neutrons have their energy reduced by collision with atomic

nuclei and become slow or thermal neutrons. Hydrogen nuclei are

so much more effective than other nuclei that this conversion of

fast to slow neutrons can be used to determine the number of

hydrogen nuclei that are present. In practice, a fast neutron source and a detector sensitive only to slow neutrons are placed in the

material. The distance between the source and detector and the

geometry of the container holding the material are both important.

The method has been used not only to measure the amount of

water in foundry sand, but to control it through auxiliary equip47
ment. An intriguing aspect of the method is that it would be

applicable to large volumes of material such as contained in a car- load or a grain elevator.

There is one major difficulty. As mentioned earlier, the effect

depends upon hydrogen nuclei, and it is the same regardless of

whether the hydrogen nuclei are present in the form of water or any compound of hydrogen. There is no problem with sand, because

practically all of the hydrogen is usually present, in the form of

water. This is not true for grain. Large amounts of hydrogen are present in the form of proteins, carbohydrates, and oils. No practical solution to this difficulty has been found.

As mentioned earlier, the Department of Agriculture has determined moisture in grain by extracting the water with a solvent and

measuring the amount of water in the solvent by titration with Kai-1

Fischer reagent. The chief difficulty arises from the titration. A

person with considerable training and technique is required to perform the titration accurately.

The Bureau is giving considerable attention to an extraction

method. The presence of water in a solvent changes the physical

properties of the solvent and the amount of change may be used to

measure the amount of water present. Refractive index, density,

dielectric constant, and conductivity are some of the properties that

vary with the concentration of water. Measurement of one of these

properties would eliminate the necessity for titration.

The method can be divided into three parts, comminution of the

sample, the choice of solvent, and the technique for determination

of the water in the extract. With respect to the first part, comminution of the sample, a Stein mill is being used to grind the material

in the presence of the solvent. This apparatus was found to be

satisfactory in the work of the Department of Agriculture. A few

experiments have been carried out with the Waring blendor and the

results warrant additional work.

The choice of solvent depends upon a number of factors, but the

most important ones are the ability to extract moisture from the

grain and the physical property that is being used for the determination of the water content of the solvent. For example, if refractive

index is to be used, the solvent should have a refractive index that

differs from that of water sufficiently to make the determination of

water as accurate as required. Methanol, dioxane, dimethyl formamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, and acetone are some of the solvents that are being considered. Dioxane is particularly suited for a dielectric

method of determining water content, because it has a dielectric

constant of less than 3 compared to a value of 80 for water.

The third part of the extraction method is the determination of

the water content of the extract. A few measurements of refractive index of water-dioxane mixtures were made on two differential

refractometers that were built at the Bureau. Creeping of the

liquid produced erratic results with one of the instruments, but

satisfactory values were obtained by the second instrument.

Both refractive index and density methods for determining the

water content of the extract require very close temperature control

of the liquid and it was decided to investigate the measurement of

dielectric constant of the extract.

48
Inasmuch as equipment suitable for this particular use is not

available, it was necessary to design such equipment. The first

problem was the construction of a cell that would hold the liquid.

.V twin cell was designed to permit rapid comparison of the dielectric constant of the solvent and the extract. The cells are sur- rounded with a common jacket to permit circulation of water when

temperature control is required. Special coaxial switches were built

to avoid changes in capacitance as the switches are used.

Careful measurements with this cell disclosed that air bubbles were

being retained under the base of the inner core of the cell. To

avoid this difficulty, the base was enclosed with an epoxy resin. The

epoxy resin eliminated the air bubbles, but it is causing the cell to

show a small drift in capacitance. The cell is being modified by

using cyinders with a conical base for the inner core, and this will

eliminate the bubbles and the need for the epoxy resin.

Measurements with this cell have been made using a transformer

bridge and a Q meter, but both of these instruments are complicated

and difficult to use. A simpler commercial instrument was found to

be too unstable for this use. Recently, a sensitive and stable capacitance meter circuit has been

developed in Japan. The circuit is comparatively simple and can

be adapted to the cell described above. An instrument is now under

construction for the Bureau.

When this equipment is available, a thorough study will be made

of the factors affecting the results, such as grinding, solvent, temperature, etc., and how closely these factors must be controlled to yield

results of the desired accuracy.

Although a large amount of work remains to be done, it is hoped

that this research will lead to a method that you will find helpful

in your work.

INTRODUCTION OF MR. J. R. ROBERTS BY W. S. BUSSEY, SECRETARY

The opportunity of introducing the next speaker is a personal

privilege for me. I had the pleasure of attending the annual con- ference of the British Institute of Weights and Measures Administration in 1956 and again in 1960. In 1959 I was elected a vice

president of the Institute, which I understand is the first and only

time that this honor has been bestowed upon any person outside

Great Britain. I appreciate that honor and I know that all weights

and measures officials in this country appreciate it, also.

Our speaker has spent several weeks in this country prior to this

Conference. He has visited with many of you and you have gotten

well acquainted with him and with his charming wife. Therefore,

to many of you he needs no introduction, and I am sure that before

he finishes his assignment and leaves the confines of the United

States, the remainder of this group will need no future introduction.

Our speaker is a career weights and measures official. He actually

entered weights and measures service in the City of Chester, England, at the age of 16 years, as a pupil-assistant. In 1928 he passed

the Board of Trade examination, which is required for all weights

and measures inspectors in Great Britain. In 1929 he became an

inspector in the city of Chester after having received this appointment. In 1930 he was appointed inspector in Cheshire County by

49
the Cheshire County Council. He next served as district inspector,

deputy chief inspector, and chief inspector of Northumberland

County from 1935 until 1946.

He became Chief Inspector for the City of Manchester, England,

in 1946, which position he holds at this time. He was elected to the

Council of the Institute of Weights and Measures Administration in

1917. He was elected as Assistant Secretary of the Institute in 1951,

and was elevated to the office of Secretary of the Institute in 1953,

and he continues to fill that important position.

Our speaker received a diploma in public administration from the

University of Durham. He is a Fellow of the Institute of Weights

and Measures Administration in England. As I stated in the beginning, he is a career weights and measures official, if there ever was

one. He is one of the most devoted persons to the weights and

measures cause that it has ever been my privilege to meet and to

know.

This is the first time that the British Institute has authorized one

of its members or officers to attend a weights and measures confer- ence outside Great Britain, as the official delegate of the Institute.

I consider that we are signally honored by being chosen as the

weights and measures organization that would receive this official

delegate for the first time.

It is with a great personal pleasure, that I would introduce to you

at this time, my personal friend, Mr. J. R. Roberts of Great Britain,

Chief Inspector of Weights and Measures for the city of Manchester

and Secretary of the Institute of Weights and Measures Administration, Mr. Roberts.

TRAINING OF THE WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL IN

GREAT BRITAIN

By J. R. Roberts, Honorary Secretary of the Institute of Weights

and Measures Administration, and Chief Inspector of Weights

and Measures, Manchester, England.

Introductory

The inspector of weights and measures in the United Kingdom is

a local government officer, employed in England and Wales either

by a county council or a municipal borough; in Scotland by a city, a county, a burgh, or a joint authority. Under whatever type of

authority he works, the inspector is unique in the local government

service in that he holds a certificate of qualification issued by the

Central Government and also that he is privileged to use as part of

his official stamp of verification the Royal cypher bearing the initials of the reigning Sovereign. Moreover, he enforces Acts of

Parliament and Regulations which are uniform throughout the

country and he works in close association with the Board of Trade,

the department of State responsible for the general coordination of an effective weights and measures service.

Since 1889 the law has decreed that no person may act as an

inspector of weights and measures unless he has passed an examination conducted by the Board of Trade and has been granted a

certificate by that department of Government. The provisions were

50
varied slightly in 1004, and the existing procedure, whereby a per- son cannot sit the Board of Trade Examination unless nominated to

do so by a local authority, and the terms of the qualification of an

inspector are as set ont in Section 8 of the Weights and Measures

Act, 1904, the full text of which is as follows:

1. The Board of Trade shall provide for the holding of examinations for

the purpose of ascertaining- whether applicants for the post of inspector under

a local authority nominated by that authority possess sufficient practical knowledge for the proper performance of the duties of inspectors of weights and

measures, and for the grant of certificates to persons who satisfactorily pass

such examinations.

2. A person shall not be appointed to act as an inspector of weights and

measures unless he has obtained such a certificate as aforesaid.

3. If any person not being an inspector duly appointed under the Weights

and Measures Acts, acts as such inspector he shall be liable to a fine not

exceeding 10 pounds, or in the case of a second or subsequent offence, twenty

pounds.

In the Weights and Measures Bill now before Parliament, the

maximum penalties proposed for anyone acting as an inspector who

is not qualified and duly appointed are £100 for a first offence,

£250 for a second or subsequent offence, or to a term of imprisonment not exceeding three months, or both.

In the 72 years' existence of the Board of Trade Examination,

7,171 candidates have sat, of whom 2,864 or 38 percent passed. At

present there are in the region of 850 practising inspectors, or roughly one to every 60,000 of the population of the United Kingdom.

The system of appointment being contingent upon success in a

specialist and competitive examination has evolved a well-trained

and efficient service. There are approximately 250 weights and measures authorities of widely varying sizes and densities of population,

but in every one there are employed full-time officials with the same

basic qualification and with the same statutory responsibilities and

duties. Within the long established tradition of enforcement at local

level, there is therefore the underlying effect of uniformity of purpose and action, and despite occasional suggestions that the service

should be fully centralised, it is evident that weights and measures

administration will remain a function of the local authorities. The

new Weights and Measures Bill suggests that there will be some

changes in the actual units of administration, dependent upon the

status and population of an area, but the general effect will be an

increase in the number of local authorities empowered to appoint

inspectors of weights and measures.

Prestige and Remuneration of the Weights and Measures Service

The weights and measures department of a local authority is a comparatively small one, but nevertheless it is recognised as-being

extremely important to the well being of the community, and it is

likely that its prestige will increase with added duties and responsibilities envisaged by the legislation now before Parliament. Apart

from purely weights and measures duties, many local authorities

call upon their inspectors to administer other statutes of a public

protective nature, such as those relating to food and drugs, petroleum

and explosives, merchandise marks and fertilisers and animal feecl51
ing stuffs. With the ever-widening interest in all aspects of con- sumer protection, it seems likely that still more duties will devolve

upon the weights and measures departments, which indeed provide

a ready-made service of trained personnel fully equipped technically

and legally to undertake this class of protective legislation.

In common with all branches of the local government service in

Great Britain today, the weights and measures departments are experiencing a period of difficulty in attracting a sufficient number

of junior entrants of the right type. This is particularly noticeable

in the urban areas and is perhaps symptomatic of the period of full

employment when the civil and local government services have to

compete with the better pay and prospects offered by commerce and

industry. Certainly remuneration in the weights and measures service is not large by modern standards, although much progress lias

been made in the postwar years, and efforts are continually being

made by the staff associations to ensure that salaries do not lag too

far behind those merited by the importance of the service and those

paid in other professions.

The Institute of Weights and Measures Administration is a professional body and by its constitution is debarred from engaging in

salaries and service conditions activities. Nevertheless its aims and

objects are directed towards enhancing the dignity and prestige of

its members and must have some bearing on the standing of the

inspector of weights and measures in his community.

Most inspectors and their assistants belong to the National and

Local Government Officers Association, which, with its membership

of 274,000, exerts a powerful influence in its trade union, but nonpolitical, activities. There are also two other bodies, the Association

of Inspectors of Weights and Measures and the Society of Chief

Inspectors of Weights and Meastires, which look after the material

interests of the qualified personnel.

Salaries in the local government service in Britain are negotiated

and fixed on a national basis, and there exists elaborate machinery

whereby employers and employees get together to arrive at grading

schemes which are generally applicable throughout the country.

Separate Joint Councils exist at the present time for England and

Wales and for Scotland. Apart from salary scales, these bodies

determine conditions of service such as leave entitlement, sickness

payments, financial assistance for post-entry training, and many

other matters affecting the welfare of the officer. All posts are, of

course, superannuate on a contributary basis.

At the time of writing, a junior entrant to the local government

service in England and Wales has a salary scale in the General Division of £220 at age 16, rising to £455 at age 22, with extended increments up to a maximum of £690 per annum. There are other Divisions, such as Clerical or Miscellaneous, appropriate for the

unqualified officer according to his duties and responsibilities, with

salaries ranging from £450 to £915. So far as inspectors of weights

and measures are concerned, there is a special basic scale for a newly

qualified officer commencing at £745 and rising by annual increments

in five years to £960. Salaries for the higher posts, such as district,

divisional, deputy chief, and chief inspectors, are at the discretion

of the local authority, and there is inevitably some lack of uni52
formity throughout the country dependent somewhat upon the size

f and, may one say. the generosity of the local authority.

Needless to say, the various staff associations have as their goal

r the establishment not only of generally improved rates of pay, but

of national scales applicable to all grades of inspectorship.

It is of interest to note that in the Weights and Measures Bill

e currently before the House of Commons the designations "chief int spector of weights and measures" and "deputy chief inspector of

c weights and measures" are given official recognition for the first time.

[[ In the existing legislation all references are only to "inspector" and

0 the titles of the senior posts have only become common by adminis-

(1 trative convenience and long usage. Under the Bill every Aveights

.

i and measures authority must appoint a chief inspector and may appoint a deputy who can carry out the duties of his chief whenever

„ necessary. This new statutory recognition is of course accompanied

by many additional responsibilities and must lead to added prestige

i( in our profession.

So far the weights and measures service in Britain is an all-male

y preserve, except for clerical posts, but there is nothing either in

ii present or prospective legislation to prevent a woman becoming an

inspector of weights and measures. There are certain aspects of the

t j work which would be suitable for the opposite sex, particularly if

ie we extend further into the consumer protection field, and the day

may not be far distant when our departments may be the brighter

l(

|

I for some feminine influence.

Recruitment

Methods of recruitment to the weights and measures service vary

to some degree between the different local authorities, but they all

1 have the same end—to secure, or to endeavour to secure, the entrant

who will fulfill the qualities needed to make a good inspector. There

are many inspectors practising today who have come from different

walks of life, but none who have not had to devote a period of

intense and fairly lengthy study for the Board of Trade Examination and to practical training in a weights and measures office. It

is impossible nowadays for anyone to obtain qualification without

having spent some time beforehand actually on the job under the

e '

j guidance of experienced inspectors.

The most favoured method of recruitment today, and the one most

;j

i likely to produce the best results, is to engage the embryo inspector

h straight from school at age 16, 17, or 18 years. This is effected in

different ways. The larger authorities have a junior entrants ex111 animation open to all who favour a career in local government. The

successful candidates form a pool from which the different depart

e

i ments of the local authority can make their selection. Often ex- planatory talks are given to school leavers to help them to choose

Jf the work for which they feel they have interest and aptitude. It is

unlikely that many boys while still at school have any ideas about

I making a career in weights and measures, and this is one of the

ly services that has to be sold to them. A useful way of doing this is

t- to encourage group visits of youngsters nearing school-leaving age

it, to the weights and measures department when the attractions of a

in ! job which does not involve being tied to a desk all one's life can

ii- be explained.

53
Selection boards operate in some areas, juniors being- interviewed,

their capabilities and school records being assessed, and the work of

the authority explained so that they can themselves give some indication of preference. There has also been established a Local Government Entrance Examination which is conducted on a regional basis.

This obviates the need for local authorities to conduct their own

examinations and opens the door to employment in any one of the

several authorities in the same area. Yet another method of recruiting the junior entrant is solely on

the results of his school-leaving examination. The General Certificate of Education with passes in at least four subjects is usually

acceptable. Obviously some leaning towards the technical subjects

is desirable, and passes in Mathematics and English essential.

Although recruitment direct from school is probably the best, this

is not by any means the only method of entry to the weights and

measures service. Officers can transfer from one department to

another within a local authority, and there is recruitment from outside local government by means of public advertisement. The latter

method is probably more favoured when the officer required is not

one who is primarily intended to become an inspector, but rather

needed for the mechanical or clerical work of the department.

At one time the weights and measures department frequently had

some connection with the police force, but this is now almost entirely

extinct. To the writer's knowledge there is only one local authority

in the country where there is now any direct connection between the

two branches of enforcement. Even here the inspectors and assistants have for several years been recruited from civilian sources and

a process of change is well on the way to completion. Men who had

some early police training have proved to be excellent inspectors of

weights and measures, but it is recognised that weights and measures

administration today is a highly specialised field for which extensive

training in other than enforcement activities is required. The police

authorities are relieved of the extraneous duties and, although there

is close and friendly liaison whenever found necessary, the weights

and measures department is today an entirely separate civilian or- ganisation, usually headed by a, chief inspector directly responsible

to the local authority.

Another source of recruitment in the past has been from the scale

industry, but this is of comparatively rare occurrence nowadays.

Men with specialised knowledge of weighing instruments are cer- tainly an asset, but more than this is required of an inspector, and

the mechanic seldom feels inclined to go back to school and start

studying for the theoretical subjects of the examination. Again

there is the friendliest cooperation between the industry and the

inspectorate accompanied by a mutual recognition that in most re- spects their interests are entirely distinct.

Whichever method of recruitment is followed, (here is no doubt

that the most important stage, is the personal interview before en- gagement. This is carried out by a senior officer of the department,

the chief inspector or his deputy. On the selection of the new entrant, the future of the service depends, and the most careful enquiry

needs to be made not only into the candidate's educational background but into his character, mental and physical alertness, appear54
ance and general aptitude for the job. At this interview the prospects in the way of pay, promotion, and service conditions are explained, and the candidate left in no doubt that hard work and

intensive study are his lot if he wants to make any headway. Qualification as an inspector is the goal at which he must aim. If he does

not succeed in this, he will have no future in weights and measures

other than acting as an assistant in the routine mechanical or clerical

duties. He must also be told that, even after he has qualified, he

will only be starting to learn and that continuing application will

be necessary to keep abreast of changes in the administrative, technical, and legislative aspects of his chosen career.

Training of the New Entrant

There is at the moment no age limit for entry to the Board of

Trade Examination, but it is proposed by the Weights and Measures

Rill that no certificate will be granted before age 21 years. Cases

are known where there have been successes before this age, but in

general an assistant is usually turned 21 before he sits, and for the

junior entrant this enables a period of three to five years to be spent

in preparation for the examination. As long a period as possible

should be allowed for any student to obtain a thorough grasp of the

work and to complete the various studies in good time. Five years

preparatory work is not too long to cover the scope of the present

syllabus.

On first entry the student will probably spend most of his time

on clerical duties, thereby familiarising himself with the routine of

the office, the records which have to be kept, and generally obtaining

knowledge of the functions of the department. He will be encour- aged to get to know the various types of standard and traders'

equipment handled in the department. Later he will take part in

the various processes of testing weighing and measuring equipment.

In many offices the adjustment of traders' weights and measures is

carried out, and in this he will participate under the supervision and

guidance of senior officers. Although the duties of verification and

inspection can only be carried out by a qualified inspector, the inspector who has the training and future of his assistant at heart

will gradually allow him, under close personal supervision, to carry

out more and more of the prescribed tests. It is this practical assist- ance and experience that is invaluable to the budding inspector.

In due course the junior will act as an assistant in the outdoor

duties of the department. It is the invariable practice for an inspector to be accompanied by at least one assistant in his visits to trading

premises, usually one for routine inspection at retail establishments,

but two or more on industrial or weighbridge inspection. Whenever motor transport is used, the assistant may be required to act as driver of the van or car. Apart from assistance in the mechanical

processes on inspection the assistant will be taught to keep his eyes

and ears open, as he will frequently be called upon for corroborative

evidence in court proceedings arising from reports of infringements.

He will be a most important witness in many cases, particularly

where he has been responsible for making test purchases to check

complaints of short Aveight or measure. Altogether by constant participation in the supervisional work he will be acquiring knowledge

55
and. of great importance, learning how to deal with the varying

types of persons with whom an inspector is brought into contact.

By precept and example from his superiors, he will learn the tactful

yet firm approach and be taught to carry out his duties with the

courtesy, impartiality, and consideration expected from a public

official. Concurrent with all this practical work, the student will be following- a set course of theoretical training. This might take the form of a correspondence course, attendance at part-time courses, lectures

within or outside the office, or purely private study. Generally it is a combination of all these. Correspondence courses are available for

the weights and measures examinations from a few commercial

schools, but probably the most popular and certainly the most suc- cessful is the long-established course run by the National and Local

Government Officers Association. This course provides a programme

of carefully planned study spread over a suitable period for the

Testamur Examination of the Institute of Weights and Measures

Administration and for the Board of Trade Examination. The

tutors for the specialised subjects are qualified inspectors of weights

and measures of long experience who' we find are also active in their

own localities in matters relating to the training of weights and

measures personnel. Each year, immediately before the Board of

Trade Examination, the NALGO Correspondence Institute arranges

a three-day training course to enable candidates to obtain a final

brushing-up by talks and discussions, mock oral and practical ex- aminations, and demonstrations of weighing and measuring equipment provided by various manufacturers of scales, petrol pumps, etc. The principal objects of the Institute of "Weights and Measures

Administration include the following:

d. To provide facilities for the training and education of candidates for the

statutory qualification as an Inspector of Weights and Measures, or for any

or all of the Testamurs of the Society.

e. To appoint Examiners and to arrange and administer such examinations

as may he necessary to test the knowledge and competence of persons engaged

in. or seeking to be engaged in the administration of the Weights and Measures Acts or in any other branch of administration, or in any part thereof,

in which any of its members are engaged, and, in proper cases, to issue a Testamur to such persons as may be recommended by such Examiners as aforesaid as being worthy thereof and/or, to do all or any of such things as aforesaid jointly or in consultation or combination with any person or body

(including a Government department).

The Institute has been extremely active during the postwar years

in pursuance of these aims. The Council has a standing committee

for Educational Service, with its own Secretary and at present under

the chairmanship of a graduate inspector. The Controller of Standard Weights and Measures Department of the Board of Trade is a co-opted member of the committee. An examination, known as the

Weights and Measures Testamur, has been established and is widely

recognised as an important preliminary to the final statutory qualifying examination. Since its inauguration in 1951 there have been

18 examinations at which 674 candidates have sat, of whom 151 or

22.4 percent have been successful in obtaining Testamur certificates.

The proportion of passes to the number who sit indicates the high

standard demanded.

The Committee on Weights and Measures Legislation (The Hodg56
son Committee) in its monumental report to the Government in 1951

warmly commended the Institute for its "activity in promoting ever higher standards in the weights and measures service" and recom- mended, as a recognition of the value of the Institute's examination,

that "its successful candidates should be exempted from the English

and Arithmetic papers (and such other papers as might from time

to time he determined) in the Board of Trade Examination."

The Institute is proud of the fact that this was the first of the

Hodgson Committee's recommendations to be implemented, for in

1!>«">4. after useful and most cooperative discussion with the Controller of Standard AVeights and Measures Department, the Board

of Trade granted official recognition of the examination by allowing

exemption from the English, Arithmetic, and Mechanics and Physics

papers in their own examination to holders of the Institute's Weights

and Measures Testamur Certificate. Since then, 116 holders of the

Institute's Testamur have availed themselves of the exemption and

90 have subsequently secured the Board of Trade Certificate.

A training programme for the Testamur and the Board of Trade

Certificate has been sponsored by the Institute's Educational Services Committee. A student for the Testamur must be a bona fide

assistant in a weights and measures office. He must be at least

17 years of age before he can sit for the examination and must have

been registered with the Institute for at least twelve months beforehand. A set of study notes is supplied to him covering the subjects

other than English, Mathematics, Mechanics and Physics and General Knowledge. These valuable notes have been compiled by expert

members of the Institute and deal with Legal (separate sets for

English and Scottish students owing to existing differences in procedure in the two countries) , Weighing and Measuring Practice

and Care and Custody of Standards.

Series of lectures, regular classes, one-day and week-end schools are organised by the branches of the Institute and by individual inspectors particularly interested in educational activities. In at least

three areas where there are reasonable numbers of students with

fairly easy access to convenient centres, courses have been established

in conjunction with the local education authorities. Typical of such

courses is one, now in its eleventh year, which provides tuition on

three evenings a week during the winter months, with first and sec- ond year classes for Legal topics and Weighing and Measuring

Practice and a joint class for Mechanics and Physics. For the

specialised subjects, inspectors act as lecturers. Homework is set and terminal examinations held. In several districts, apart from

lectures, special demonstrations of particular types of equipment are

given, usually with the enthusiastic cooperation of manufacturers

of weighing and measuring instruments, who are always ready to

loan items of equipment, to provide members of their technical staffs as lecturers, and to welcome group visits to their factories. One firm

has for several years, in cooperation with the local Chief Inspector,

organised a short course for weights and measures students at their

works shortly before each Board of Trade Examination.

There are many other directions in which the Institute seeks to

promote the interests of the future inspectorate. Registered students

may obtain its journal, The Monthly Review, at a nominal subscrip57
lion rate, they are free to use the Institute's library facilities, en- couraged to attend branch meetings and to avail themselves of all the advice and assistance the Institute can give through its enthusiastic Education Secretary. Copies of past examination papers for the

Testamur and Board of Trade examinations are supplied at a very

cheap rate. A special feature at the Institute's Annual Conference is the presentation of the prize given to the most successful candidate

in the previous year's Testamur examination.

In common with other local government officers, weights and measures students obtain financial assistance from their employers for

post-entry training. This includes 75 percent or 100 percent payment for expenses attending recognised courses and at examinations,

tuition and entry fees, etc. Time off for study is granted, and

altogether every encouragement is given to those avIio intend to get

ahead in the service.

The Examinations

The Testamur Examination of the Institute of Weights and Measures is held once a year, usually in October, at various centres

selected for convenience of traveling. It is spread over three days

and the syllabus is summarised as follows:

1. English

Essay: The ability to express and develop an idea to a logical conclusipM

A knowledge and understanding of the use of the English language with special reference to fundamentals and clarity of expression.

Precis: The ability to grasp the essence of a passage or subject and to state these essentials clearly and concisely, without loss of meaning.

2. General Kno wledge

An appreciation of the nature and significance of the common objects of

daily life. Acquaintance with current events.

3. Arithmetic

The rules of arithmetic, fractions, decimals, ratio, proportions, square root, tables of weights and measures, metric system, simple and compound practice.

Percentages, profit and loss, simple and compound interest. Mensuration.

4. Legal

Scope and functions of the various types of courts of law. Elements of

legal procedure. Knowledge of the contents of the Weights and Measures Acts

and Regulations. Investigational procedure, statements, cautions, preparation

and consideration of reports. Court procedure, rules of evidence, examination

of witnesses, and general conduct of a case. Appeal cases of outstanding significance.

5. Mechanics and Physics

Hydrostatics : Density and specific gravity. Pressure in liquids and gases. Barometers, pressure-measuring devices, air pumps.

Statics and Dynamics: Units, velocity, acceleration, momentum. Forces,

machines and their characteristics. Gravity. Weight and mass. Work, energy, power, friction and elasticity.

Heat: Specific heat. The thermometer. Expansion of solids, liquids, and

gases. Conduction, convection, and radiation.

0. Weighing and Measuring Practice

Fundamental theory and principles of construction of weighing and measuring appliances. Properties of materials used in their construction. Weighing and measuring equipment used for scientific purposes (balance, vernier,

micrometer, spherometer, etc.). Standards and Equipment. Materials of construction, methods of use, maintenance, and reverification.

58
7. Practical

Examination, verification and stamping of weights, measures, weighing

and measuring instruments. Adjusting of weights and measures. (Candidates

are expected to he familiar only with appliances commonly in use. Speed and

accuracy are needed in this 1% hour test.)

Although covering some of the same ground, the examination is

by no moans a pale reflection of the Board of Trade Examination.

In some respects the syllabus is wider, in others the knowledge re- quired is not so advanced. The overall purposes of the examination

have been worked out carefully and they are, in short, to enable

assistants to judge at an early age their suitability for a weights and

measures career, to help their employers to assess capabilities, to give

examination experience, and to produce a higher standard of performance at the Board of Trade Examination. The examiners in

English, Arithmetic, Mechanics and Physics and Legal (English and

Scottish) are university graduates and nonmembers of the Institute.

For the specialised subjects such as Weighing and Measuring Practice and Practical and for General Knowledge, the examiners are highly experienced inspectors who hold extra academic qualifications.

The markings go to a Chairman of Examiners, who coordinates the

results, prepares the pass list, and reports on each examination to

the Council of the Institute.

Results are published within six weeks of the completion of the

examination. A candidate referred by the examiners in one subject

(other than Practical) may take that subject alone at a subsequent

special examination. Successful candidates receive a certificate bearing the seal of the Institute, whilst the unsuccessful ones can derive

a great deal of cold comfort by noting carefully the remarks of the

Chairman of Examiners in his comprehensive report.

The Testamur Examination is a worthwhile qualification in itself

and has been recognised as such in a material respect by several local

authorities who award improvements in salary gradings to holders

of the certificate. Increasingly, it is being regarded as the best

method of progression towards the final statutory qualification, and

it is undoubtedly succeeding in producing a higher standard of

candidate for the Board of Trade Examination. Possession of the

Testamur Certificate is acceptable as a qualification for admission to

associate membership of, and to the accompanying closer participation in the activities of, the Institute of Weights and Measures

Administration.

The Board of Trade Examination for Inspectorship of Weights

and Measures is also held once a year, in London, usually in April,

and is generally spread over three days. Written parts are taken at

various centres in the Capital, practical tests and the oral examination at the Standard Weights and Measures Department. At present,

nomination for the examination is required from a local authority.

This, in effect, virtually restricts the examination to candidates actually employed in weights and measures offices. Candidates must

supply a certificate of good character from a nominating local authority, a Justice of the Peace, or their last employer. Regrettably

the nomination requirement is not mentioned in the new Weights and

Measures Bill, but it is unlikely that any but bona fide assistants

will ever stand any chance of success.

613254—61 5 59
The wording of the syllabus of the examination has changed very

little in 70 years, although there has been tremendous change in the

scope and variety of the legal and technical items which it covers. A summary of the syllabus is as follows

1. English Composition

Short essay on some subject of general knowledge. Observance of the

rules of grammar, punctuation, spelling, clearness of handwriting, avoidance

of ambiguity.

2. Arithmetic and Mensuration

As in the Testamur Syllabus.

3. Mechanics and Physics

Generally as in the Testamur Syllabus.

4. Weighing and Measuring Practice

Properties of metals and alloys and of the common protective treatments. Fabrication of metals. Construction and principles of recognised types of

weighing and measuring appliances, including automatic weighing machines

and self-indicating devices, measuring pumps, leather-measuring machines, etc. Criticism of special types and patterns. General knowledge of patterns ap- proved by the Board of Trade. Ability to interpret mechanical drawings.

Construction and use of vernier, micrometer, comparator, etc., methods of

weighing ; intercomparison of a set of weights ; care and use of fine balances

and standard equipment generally.

5. Acts of Parliament and Regulations

Knowledge of the provisions of the Weights and Measures Acts, 1878 to 1936 ; the Weights and Measures Regulations, 1907 to 1949 ; and other Acts

of Parliament and Statutory Instruments affecting the duties of an inspector

of weights and measures.

6. Practical and Oral

Testing of weights, measures, weighing and measuring instruments. Adjusting and stamping of weights and measures. (The practical verification

tests extend over three hours and again speed and accuracy are the requisites.)

The practical and oral parts are regarded as of particular importance. Practical tests are conducted under the surveillance of officers

of the Board of Trade who can observe whether a candidate is

familiar with the purpose and usage of items of equipment and

whether he possesses a degree of manipulative skill. The oral ex- amination takes the form of a personal interview by two examiners

of the Department who can make an assessment of the candidate's

potentialities as an inspector.

All candidates are notified personally how they have fared and

their local authorities are also informed whether their nominees have

succeeded or not. In due course, a certificate is issued to each of the

successful candidates, signed on behalf of the Board of Trade, and

this treasured piece of parchment is the passport to a career as an

inspector of weights and measures.

Progress Within the Weights and Measures Serviee

The proud possessor of the Board of Trade Certificate is now

eligible for appointment as an inspector either by filling a vacancy

on the staff of his employing authority or by applying for a post

elsewhere. Voluntary movement between local authorities is very

common, superannuation rights being preserved and service conditions generally being the same throughout the country. As mentioned earlier, there is a nationally agreed salary scale for the newly

qualified officer so that there is some degree of uniformity in respect

60
of the basic pay of the younger inspectors. The additional responsibilities of higher posts merit improved gradings and a man may

make reasonably steady financial progress either by promotion within

his own authority or by moving around from place to place. Providing it is not too frequent, a change of employment is all to the

good in weights and measures work as a means of gaining wider

experience.

Vacancies are notified by public advertisement in the press, particularly the local government journals and The Monthly Review.

Written applications are required giving details of age, experience,

and qualifications, and accompanied either by copies of testimonials or by the names of persons to whom reference can be made. Canvassing is strictly forbidden. A short list of the candidates is drawn

up and personal interviews arranged. These may be by a full committee or by a subcommittee of the Authority, or occasionally by

senior officials only. The candidates are interviewed in turn and the

selection made on the spot. At present the demand for inspectors

slightly exceeds the supply, and some authorities experience difficulty

in filling vacant posts. The obvious answer in such cases is an improvement in the financial attraction.

Departments vary in size and scope according to the geographical

limits of the administrative area, population to be served, number of

trading premises, and other factors such as a concentration of industrial establishments. The smallest type of authority may only employ one inspector of weights and measures, perhaps with one unqualified assistant. The largest county departments may have from

25 to 30 inspectors with the requisite number of clerical and technical assistants.

"Where the establishment is large, there is a reasonable chance of

promotion within the department through the various stages of district or divisional inspector, deputy chief, and chief inspector. For

inspectors with the smaller authorities, there is little opportunity of

progression except by movement elsewhere. In general, county work

is more attractive than in boroughs, and salaries tend to be higher.

There is some restriction of movement as from one type of authority

to another, say, from a borough to a county, due mainly to variation

in the ancillary duties performed. In counties, inspectors of weights

and measures often administer the Food and Drugs Acts. On the

other hand, the borough inspector will frequently be an officer under

the Petroleum and Explosives Acts, which are not generally administered by his county colleagues.

In some of the larger departments there may be a degree of

specialisation, certain inspectors spending most of their time on

such duties as coal inspection, checking petrol pumps, or testing and

stamping at a scale factory. While this may be an administrative

convenience, it is not too good for the personnel involved to be kept on the same job too long. All-round experience in every aspect of

weights and measures work is necessary if a man is to maintain his

interest and enthusiasm and not to be at a disadvantage when applying for another post.

Many ambitious inspectors have not been content just to possess the

Board of Trade Certificate, but they have by part-time study obtained further academic qualifications. There are in the profession

61
today several barristers-at-law and many holders of degrees or diplomas in the sciences, the arts, law, and public administration. It

is, of course, noticeable that these men are frequently in the top jobs or in line for them.

The Board of Trade Certificate has become of importance in Commonwealth countries, particularly Africa. British inspectors hold

appointments with the Governments of Kenya, Tanganyika, Uganda,

Rhodesia, and Nigeria at the present time and they are playing an

important role in introducing weights and measures administration

to these deAT eloping states and in the training of local personnel.

The weights and measures service in the Sudan was pioneered by

inspectors from Britain, and there should be other openings forthcoming to those inspectors who are willing to exchange the certainty

of long-term security at home for a more interesting life abroad.

Further Training of The Inspector

An inspector really starts to learn his job after he has qualified

and he goes on learning for the rest of his professional life. Weights

and measures administration and techniques must endeavour to keep

abreast of the ever-changing pattern of trade practices and industrial developments. Unfortunately, in the United Kingdom the law

has lagged far behind, and for a long period we have been working

under out-dated statutes totally unrelated to modern conditions. Our

principal code of technical regulations is 54 years old, and it is a tribute to the foresight of those who framed them that they can still be made to apply to present-day weighing and measuring equipment.

However, the long-promised revision of the Acts and Regulations is now in sight, and soon we hope to have legislation that will be more

in line with present-day practice.

The Board of Trade does not have statutory powers to initiate or operate any set programme of training for inspectors, but nevertheless, by the very nature of its legal functions, it does give a great

deal of assistance to those local officials whose job it is to carry out

enforcement in the field. For example, under the provisions of Section 6 of the Weights and Measures Act, 1904, every commercial

device for weighing and measuring possessing novel features must

be of a pattern approved by the Board of Trade before it can be

accepted for verification and stamping for use in trade. For each

pattern approved, a notice is issued and copies are distributed to

every weights and measures authority in the country. These notices,

and there are nearly 1,300 of them, contain photographs, drawings,

and descriptions of the approved patterns, and they form an invaluable reference library for the inspector. In the same way descriptions of many thousands of minor modifications to approved patterns

are made available to the inspectorate by appearance in the bulletins issued periodically by the Board of Trade. These bulletins also

contain other items of value to the inspector, imparting as they do

the opinions and decisions of the Board when they have been consulted on certain aspects of the regulations. Officers of Standard

Weights and Measures Department are always willing, within the

limits of their statutory powers, to give advice and assistance on the

many legal and technical problems posed to them.

It was suggested in the Report of the Committee on Weights and

Measures Legislation that there should be organised refresher courses

62
for inspectors of weights and measures, and one cannot help but

feel somewhat disappointed thai nothing appears in this connection

in the new Weights and Measures Bill. It is, of course, debatable

whether this is a proper function for the Board of Trade or whether

such courses should not be organised by the local authorities themselves. There are difficulties such as the question of financing out of

local funds, granting of special leave for the participating inspectors,

and obtaining the services of suitable lecturers. None of these are insuperable and, if there were some form of sponsoring by the Government, it is likely that professional courses w^ould be readily or- ganised and well supported by the local authorities throughout the

country.

The Institute of Weights and Measures Administration plays an

important role in the post-qualification education of the inspector.

The first three of its principal objects, declared in the Memorandum

of Association, are

a. To advance the legal, technical, scientific, practical, and general knowledge of persons engaged in the administration of the Weights and Measures

Arts and any other legislation or duties which can or may be administered or undertaken by its members.

b. To promote the interchange of ideas, opinions, and experiences between

its members.

c. To provide facilities for and to promote and encourage research and learning in all subjects and matters relating to or affecting the administration of

the Weights and Measures Acts and any other legislation or duties which are, or may be, administered or undertaken by its members, and to record and

preserve and make available the results of such research and learning for

the benefit of students and all such persons as may be interested therein.

In pursuance of these and other objects, the Institute maintains a constant policy of disseminating information in as many ways as

possible. Its journal The Monthly Revieio is supplied to all members, who constitute practically 100 percent of the inspectors in the

country, and of course to many subscribers other than inspectors,

both at home and overseas. It publishes news and views on every

topic of interest in the sphere of weights and measures, including

technical and legal articles, reports the activities of the Institute and

its members, and the unbroken series of volumes for the past 68 years on anything connected with weights and measures. Other means for the interchange of ideas and experiences are through the medium of the Annual Conference and branch meetings.

Before World War II the Annual Conference was invariably held

in London, but since 1946 the venue has changed each year. A pattern has been established so that the Conference visits each of the

Institute's branch areas in turn. This, we believe, has the effect of

"selling"' weights and measures in different parts of the country and

also gives the opportunity to many inspectors of visiting the Conference when it is near to their locality, which perhaps they could

not do when it wr as always held in London. The Conference sessions are devoted to the presentation of papers, open forums, sectional

meetings, and the transaction of Institute business. An exhibition of

weighing and measuring equipment, both commercial and standard,

is held in conjunction with the Conference and is well supported by

the manufacturers who welcome the opportunity of meeting in this

way the delegates and visitors.

63
The 11 branches of the Institute in England, Wales, and Scotland

hold regular meetings (as do those in Northern Ireland and East

Africa), usually twice a year. These are very well attended and

provide lively sources of discussion of matters of common interest.

Again, papers are read, question and answer sessions held, mock

trials arranged, and group visits made to places of interest such as large industrial plants. It is considered that the strength of the

Institute is derived from its branch organisation, which stimulates

and maintains the interest of the inspectorate in the various localities.

The facilities of the Institute's library are available to all members of the Institute. Established only 6 years ago, it has been built

up into a repository of several hundreds of volumes on weights and

measures and kindred subjects. Legislative codes from all parts of

the world are on file, as are many periodicals, press cuttings, and

papers. The publications of the National Bureau of Standards

feature prominently among those donated from abroad.

There are two standing committees of the Council of the Institute

which are of particular use to the inspector seeking guidance in his

work and further studies. The Reference Committee deals with

queries from members on points of legal and administrative difficulty, while the Publications Committee, apart from supervision of

the business side of The Monthly Revieio is responsible for various

other publications such as the Weights and Measures Handbook,

memoranda, and treatises on many different subjects. Work is well

in hand on what we believe will be a major contribution to weights

and measures knowledge in the form of technical books on weighing

and measuring instruments, while there is also prospect of a legal

textbook once the new Act is settled.

In September 1961 there will be held at a College of Cambridge

University the first advanced professional course of its kind in Great

Britain. This will take the form of a weekend school for about

70 inspectors on such subjects as:

1. Law of contract and sale of goods.

2. Law of evidence and Court procedure.

3. Statistical analysis of errors on prepacked goods.

4. Economics of production as applied to weight and quality of goods, and

types of containers.

5. Electronics as applied to weighing and measuring instruments.

6. Psychology in Public Administration.

The school has been organised by the South East Midland Branch

with the wholehearted support of the Council of the Institute. Local

authorities have responded well in authorising the attendance of

their inspectors. The outcome of this project will be watched with

interest, for it is regarded as a pilot scheme and, if successful, it will

no doubt be followed by similar schemes in other university centres.

Interest in the use of visual aids for training purposes has been

fostered by widespread showings of the films "A True Standard,"

"Testing Mass Standards by Substitution," and "Assignment

Weights and Measures" kindly donated by the National Bureau of

Standards to the Institute. These have been exhibited to many

gatherings of inspectors and their assistants, and it is hoped that it may be possible to undertake the production of similar films in

Britain when the financial obstacles can be overcome. Whatever help the weights and measures official may get in his

64
vocational training from outside sources will only be complementary

to the facilities available in his own office. The younger inspector in

particular should be encouraged to discuss problems with his colleagues, and he should have ready access to the office library and

to those periodicals to which the department subscribes. In the

larger departments there should be regular meetings of the chief

inspector and all the qualified staff. An inspector should not be

kept on a specialised job too long, and an interchange of district

from time to time will be beneficial to him and perhaps also to some

of the traders. JMovel items or special installations of weighing or measuring equipment should quickly be made known to all the inspectors. An interesting job can be made still more interesting by

variety, and there is certainly plenty of that in weights and measures administration.

What of the Future?

That there is need for expansion of training facilities both for the

unqualified and qualified weights and measures official is beyond

question. Technical progress will continue, trading practices will

change, and our service must be kept up-to-date by placing all possible sources of information at the disposal of the officer who will be

called upon to deal with the new problems which inevitably arise

in the course of his duties.

So far as the United Kingdom is concerned, it is evident that the

syllabus of the Board of Trade Examination will shortly have to

be revised in the light of forthcoming legislative changes. A single

Act of Parliament will replace about a dozen statutes dating back to

1878, and it will be followed by an array of new regulations dealing

not only with the weighing and measuring equipment at present

under control, but other devices with which hitherto the inspector

has not been directly concerned. The new Act will apply to a wider

range of commodities than do the present laws, and there will be

power to bring still more under control from time to time.

There is a significant difference between the wording of Section 8

of the Weights and Measures Act 1904 and that of the corresponding

clause of the Weights and Measures Bill in the reference to the

inspector's examination. The former refers to the holding of ex- aminations for the purpose of ascertaining whether candidates possess "sufficient practical knowledge for the proper performance of the

duties of inspectors of weights and measures." Clause 43 of the Bill

says the examinations are to test whether candidates possess "sufficient skill and knowledge." This seems to have wider implication,

and the students for the examination in the future will need to

possess even more qualities than are needed today.

As remarked earlier, the scope of weights and measures administration is too wide to be covered by one examination. Already there

is the Weights and Measures Testamur as a staging point on the way

to full qualification, and it could well be that in the future there will

perforce have to be a preliminary, intermediate, and final stage. At

present there is nothing in the examinations relating to electricity

and magnetism—a deficiency which will have to be remedied in view

of the increasing application of electronic principles and techniques

to weighing and measuring equipment. Also, whilst a candidate is

examined as to his knowledge of the content of the weights and

65
measures laws, there is no reference in the Board of Trade syllabus

to the constitution of the judicial system, court procedure, rules of

evidence, and the various legal processes. The spread of prepackaging and increased activity in the supervision of commodities have

indicated a need for at least an elementary knowledge of statistical

method and sampling procedure.

Clearly the whole system of examination for weights and measures personnel needs to be kept under constant review. The Institute

of Weights and Measures Administration is prepared to play an

increasing part in the training and examination programmes, but it must be emphasised that it has no wish to assume the function of

issuing the final certificate of qualification. It is envisaged that this

should always remain with the central Government. There is dignity

and prestige in the fact that alone in the local government service

the inspector of Aveights and measures possesses a qualification

granted by one of H. M. Departments of State.

On the training side, one would wish to see further extension of

the activities at present in operation. More classes and lecture courses for students and inspectors should be provided, increased use made of visual aids such as films, film-strips, and slides, and the

dearth of up-to-date literature on weights and measures subjects

made good. Some system of interchange of students between the

different types of jurisdictions would be useful, whilst for the inspectorate there should be facilities for international exchange such

as exist for certain other professions. Many overseas students, particularly from the newer countries of the Commonwealth, have

visited Britain for weights and measures training. There already

exists a regular exchange of publications, etc., between the British

Institute and official organisations in such countries as Australia,

Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, India, South Africa, United

States of America, and U. S. S. R. Even more useful would be a periodic exchange of the weights and measures officials themselves.

Apart from being a contribution towards international understanding, such an exchange would provide unique opportunities of acquiring new ideas and experiences in the sphere of weights and measures

administration.

Conclusion

In reviewing the training and educational activities in the British

weights and measures service, no claim is made either that they are unique, original, or by any means perfect. Similar projects will be

in operation elsewhere, and in this resjDect we are anxious to benefit

from the experience of our colleagues in other lands who will have

developed other methods of selecting and training their officials. The

system of dual control operatrve in the United Kingdom, with different aspects of responsibility resting between the central government and many local authorities, makes coordination of training

activities rather difficult. Nevertheless, we feel that sound progress

is being made, although there is no complacency about the future.

If stress has been laid upon the part played by the Institute of

Weights and Measures Administration, it is because of familiarity

with its policy and ideals. As the sole professional representative

body of the inspectorate, it is conscious of its responsibility to

present and future members in particular and to the community in

66
general. No effort will be spared to do all that is possible towards

elevating the dignity and standing of all engaged in weights and

measures administration. In these endeavours the Institute looks

with confidence towards increasing cooperation and support from the

central and local government authorities in Great Britain.

DISCUSSION ON FOREGOING PAPER

Mr. Crawford : Mr. Roberts, your talk this morning created in our minds a very high opinion of the administration of weights and

measures in England. We are very happy to have had you here, and

at the same time all of us would like to express our feelings of good

cheer and happiness because of the accord and reception that you

gave Mr. Bussey over there and the honors that you accorded him.

We hold him in high esteem.

I have met a number of inspectors from Great Britain and Europe.

It has been interesting to talk to them about their procedure in

testing weighing and measuring devices. I understand, Mr. Roberts,

that many devices are brought into your laboratories or your offices

for testing. Would you please tell us about this?

Mr. Roberts: Our work is roughly divided into two categories.

The first is broadly equivalent to what I think you call the mechanical, and the second, supervisional. With us it is verification and

inspection. Inspection, as the name implies, is the visiting of all

types of trading premises to see that the equipment is up to standard. Verification is the work of testing new or repaired equipment,

because our law says that nothing can be put into use until it has

first been tested and stamped by an inspector. This work of verification does entail the bringing into our offices of quite a number of

different types of equipment. The smaller scales, for example, will

be brought to us for test, although it is also quite common for

inspectors to visit the premises of scale makers and there carry out

the tests. In fact, in those center's where there are scale manufacturers, inspectors are engaged almost full time at these factories verifying

and stamping the smaller types of equipment. This does not apply

to dormant scales and weighbridges. These have to be verified where

they are installed, in situ. The same thing applies to petrol pumps

or, as you know them, gasoline pumps.

It is the fundamental feature of our work that nothing can be put

into use until it has been stamped. We charge fees for that work,

very nominal fees which do not by any means make the department

a paying proposition. Verification is a valuable service not only to

the public, but to the owner or operator of a piece of equipment,

who it is felt should pay a little towards the cost of that service.

A device will be examined at least once a year by the inspector on

his rounds, and no charge is made while it remains correct. If it is

found incorrect, it has to be repaired and resubmitted to an inspector, who stamps it and charges a fee.

The only adjustment carried out by inspectors is that of weights

used with equal-armed scales. This limited authority to adjust is

granted by the Board of Trade, who have to be satisfied that an

office is properly equipped for doing the work and that the work of

adjustment will not interfere with the primary duties of verification

67
and inspection. It has, in many areas, been found a great con- venience to traders and saves them having to send their weights

long distances to be adjusted and subsequently to be submitted to

an inspector. We do not adjust scales or measuring devices of any

kind. Our job is simply to test them.

Mr. Fernsten : I have two questions to ask you. You mentioned

that some 38 percent of the candidates had passed the Board of

Trade examination. Do you have a percentage figure on the

Testamur examination ? Mr. Roberts : It is much lower than that and runs to about 23 percent over the 10 years in which the Testamur has been established.

Mr. Fernsten : Then your examinations are rather severe, as you

stated.

Mr. Roberts : Both examinations are, we consider, very severe indeed. The Testamur examination may be considered as a sort of

screening examination. It is designed mainly to determine the aptitude of a youngster for this particular work, to give examination

experience, and to produce a better standard of candidate for the

Board of Trade examination.

Mr. Fernsten : I gathered from your talk that you have probably

three types of people who work in the field. You have the trainee,

the assistant, and the inspector. Could you give us any idea of the

relationship of the number of personnel? Presume you have twelve

inspectors. How many assistants would you have in an operation of

that type and how many trainees would you have?

Mr. Roberts: Perhaps I can best illustrate this by quoting the

figures for my own department. The City of Manchester has a population of about 670,000 at the moment. The total personnel in

my department is 30, of whom 12 are qualified inspectors. There

are 14 men who are engaged as assistants, one as a handyman, and

we have a small clerical section of three. Of the 14 assistants I mentioned, there are perhaps half a dozen youngish men who are con- templating carrying on to become inspectors. It is largely up to

themselves.

The examinations are open and competitive and no bars are put

in the way of anyone in the department who wishes to proceed to

qualifying as an inspector and is prepared to devote the necessary

time to study. I think this gives a fair picture of the position

throughout the country.

Mr. Bowen : First, I would like to say that I found Mr. Roberts'

address thoroughly interesting, and I am quite impressed with the

apprenticeship that the inspector must first serve. This should lend

considerable prestige to the office. My question is this: I noted in your address, Mr. Roberts, that

your stated there is a proposal to increase the penalty for impersonation of inspectors by a factor of ten, that is, from $30 to $300, for a

first offense. The thought has crossed my mind, is this because you

are troubled with an increasing number of impersonators, an increasing number of repeating offenders, or what is the reasoning behind

this proposal to increase the penalty?

Mr. Roberts: To my knowledge, sir, there has never been a case before the Courts of an impersonation of an inspector of weights

and measures. The provision is there to emphasize the extreme im68
portance of this certificate and to fix a penalty for anybody who

violates by acting as an inspector without being qualified. The

penalty 1 mentioned, the 100 pounds or roughly $300 for a first offense, is the general penalty being proposed in our new bill. Mr. Turnbull: Do you have a weights and measures law that

is common to all Great Britain or do you also have your local

legislation ? Mr. Roberts: The Weights and Measures Acts 1878 to 1926 are applicable throughout the whole length and breadth of the United

Kingdom. There are, however, certain local provisions. Many local

authorities have become impatient with the deficiencies of our outof-date national legislation and have promoted their own bills

through the full process of Parliament. The weights and measures

provisions of these bills are usually included with other powers being

sought by the local authority. A local bill must go through all the

stages in the House of Lords and the House of Commons, and

when it has finally received royal assent it has the same effect as a national act, although it only applies in a particular locality.

If I may again quote Manchester as an example, our national law

does not apply at present to the sale of coke and other manufactured

solid fuels. So, many years ago my authority obtained powers to

bring these fuels within the ambit of the weights and measures

department. After the last war we went a stage further and

included wood fuel and we also obtained local powers to deal with

person-weighing scales.

In the bill now before Parliament, it is proposed to repeal all

local weights and measures legislation so that we shall all be working

under the one unified code. If it is going to take another century

to get round to another national act I have no doubt the local

authorities will again be promoting their own legislation.

Mr. Morton : I think this question will be of interest to a lot of

people in the room, Mr. Roberts. What monthly salary do your

inspectors receive?

Mr. Roberts : You, sir, have touched upon a very delicate subject.

I can answer your question very briefly by saying "not nearly

enough."' I expected there would be some interest in the matter, so I have touched upon it briefly in the paper which you will read in

due course with the report of the Conference. The impression I

have been able to gather during my travels is that our inspectors

are getting about half of what your inspectors are getting. This is a

very, very general statement, and you must bear in mind the considerable difference in the cost of living in the two countries. The

general rate of pay over here is, of course, considerably higher than

it is in Europe, although with our welfare state in Britain we do

have certain "hidden assets."

The negotiating machinery for the local government service has

fixed a basic salary for the newly qualified inspector of weights and

measures. The starting figure is roughly $2,200 a year, rising by

annual increments to $2,880. Salaries for the higher posts are at the

discretion of the local authorities. As a professional body, the Institute of Weights and Measures is not concerned with salary matters,

but there are other organizations of a trade union but nonpolitical

nature who look after our material interests.

69
Mr. Fahy: Mr. Roberts, first I would like to commend you on

your paper. I thought it was very well presented. My question is:

Why are not your examinations open to the public, all people who

are interested in weights and measures work? Why is it necessary

for a person to be nominated by the local authorities?

Mr. Roberts : The existing nomination procedure has been effective since 1904. It does not necessarly mean a man has to be employed in a weights and measures department, but he must have

a nomination from a local authority. There have been cases in the

past where men from outside have secured these nominations, but,

believe me, unless there is the practical training in the department

there is not an earthly chance of passing the examination. The

examination is essentially a specialist one, designed to test the person's practical knowledge of the weights and measures regulations

and weighing and measuring techniques, and his general educational standards.

I suppose it is theoretically an open examination, providing the

nomination can be secured, but nominations are not given lightly by

the local authorities, and they invariably give them only to the

men whom they employ as their future inspectors.

We have perhaps what you might regard as a closed shop with our Institute Testamur examination. Again we did that deliberately, because we know from wide experience that, unless a man

is actually employed in a weights and measures office and has had

this prime training, he is just wasting his time to try these

examinations.

Mr. Blackburn : We were pleased with the emphasis on local

authority. What information do you have concerning traders that

have infringements in one jurisdiction and yet, on the other hand,

go along and operate throughout Great Britain and even Scotland

and Ireland ? Mr. Roberts: We have extremely good liaison between our departments. The word is very quickly passed around. We have not a vast continent like you have. Ours is a comparatively small country,

and it is quite easy to get information from one end of it to the

other very quickly. There are, of course, police records available.

The Institute's Journal, The Monthly tievieio, carries reports of

prosecutions, and an inspector who follows those closely can usually

remember whether the trader he is concerned with has been con- victed previously. If he is a local trader perhaps operating from

a nearby jurisdiction, it is just a moment's job to get on the telephone and ring up your opposite number and say, "Have you

had any trouble with so-and-so?" And we can usually get the

information straight away. We have had no great problem in

tracing previous infringements.

Mr. Christie: There is no doubt in my mind as to the professional qualit}- of your inspectors of weights and measures, and, in

view of your exjDerience in that regard and the trip that you have

made in the United States and the accentuation of the positive

that is now taking place on education of weights and measures men

here, I would like to impose upon your friendship for an answer

in that regard, and the question is this: Would you mind giving a suggestion as to what point we should pay attention to in our meth70
ods of training, in view of the method of acquisition of inspectors

in our United States?

Mr. Roberts: It is most difficult to give an answer to that, Mr.

Christie, because your methods of recruitment and training seem to

vary so differently from ours. But I would say the most important

thing, of course, is to lay the greatest emphasis possible on the

quality of the men you recruit. Make sure that they have the

educational background necessary to study and apply laws and regulations, make sure that they have some mechanical knowledge and

aptitude, and also that they are men of good standing dignity who will

give added prestige to your department. I hesitate to suggest it,

but we are here among friends, and I do think if you had a national

qualifying examination it would be helpful. I hope you will not

take that amiss, gentlemen. We have found that it has been an

extremely good thing, and I think we do stand fairly high in the

public regard and in the regard of our employers and of the central

government in Britain.

Mr. Richardson: Mr. Roberts, there are in industry many applications for weighing which do not directly affect the public. For

example, apportioning the ingredients that go into an end product,

recording the total amount of material produced, perhaps for inventory purposes, weighing coal for boilers within a plant, and

other weighing applications in the whole field of process control

do your weights and measures inspectors follow through on that

type of weighing equipment, maintenance, and so forth?

Mr. Rorerts: No, sir. We are concerned solely with weighing

and measuring devices used for trade—that is, for buying and sell- ing, prepackaging, checking-in, computation of wages, and the like.

Any devices such as those you mentioned are definitely outside the

scope of our weights and measures acts and would not be tested

by inspectors except upon request. If we were requested to test such devices, we should as far as possible apply the weights and

measures regulations, although the device would not be stamped

as legal for use in trade.

Mr. G. L. Johnson : Have you had a labeling problem such as misleading advertisement, as was discussed this morning?

Mr. Roberts : Indeed we have. Prejmckaging, of course, is not

so highly developed as it is in the United States, but nevertheless it

is increasing constantly, and we are getting the same problems as were so ably demonstrated to us this morning. We have not quite

the huge variety of fantastic claims, but even so we do have "giant,"

we have "large," we have "handy household" sizes, and all sorts of

meaningless descriptions of that nature. We are working very

hard at this problem, as are two extremely active consumer organizations, the Consumer Advisory Council of the British Standards

Institution and Consumers Association, Limited. They have interested themselves very much in this question and have given wide publicity to it. There is a Government committee sitting at the moment

inquiring into all aspects of consumer protection, including the

Merchandise Marks Act, which deals with the mislabeling of products. Evidence has been submitted by my Institute and the two

other bodies I have mentioned, and we are hoping that, when the

committee issues its report, it will make certain suggestions for

legislation to deal with this problem.

71
Mr. Grassi: What is the legal status of your Institute and how

can membership in that Institute be acquired?

Mr. Roberts: We have legal standing in that we are approved

by the Board of Trade. We are recognized as a professional body

of public officials. Corporate membership is restricted to qualified

inspectors of weights and measures holding appointments in the

United Kingdom or with similar qualifications and appointments

in other parts of the British Commonwealth.

We have other categories of membership. An associate member

must be a bona fide weights and measures assistant, holding either

the Board of Trade Certificate or the Institute's Testamur. We

have a category of honorary membership which is available to a person who is not an inspector of weights and measures, but who

is associated with weights and measures administration otherwise

than in the manufacture, sale, or maintenance of weighing and

measuring appliances. Other categories are those of Fellow, Life

Member, Retired Member, and, of course, we have a President and

Vice Presidents.

At present, membership is in general confined to Aveights and

measures personnel in the British Commonwealth, but that does not

prevent anyone getting in touch with us at any time and subscribing

to our journal, The Monthly Revieio. We firmly believe the more

interchange with our opposite numbers abroad, the better.

Mr. Grassi: Who publishes the magazine?

Mr. Roberts: It is obtainable from J. R. Roberts, Weights and

Measures Office, Manchester, England, who is responsible for the

circulation.

Mr. Sanders: You say your law is nearly 100 years old. There

has been, I would judge, a lot of improvement in weighing devices

and measuring devices, of course, in that period of time. You can

see the work of this Conference is changing the tolerances and

specifications all along every year. I think in 47 years it has been

changed every year. How do your tolerances and requirements for

scales and weighing compare with ours over here?

And the second question is that you did not mention, I believe,

that scale manufacturers and measuring equipment manufacturers,

as associate members of your Institute, have the freedom of the

floor, and so forth, in discussions.

Mr. Roberts: I will answer that one first, Mr. Sanders. They

are not eligible to become members of the Institute. As I say, it is purely a professional association and nobody can be a member

if he is engaged in the manufacture or selling or repairing of scales.

But do not for one moment think that we have anything but the

most happy relationships with our friends from the industry. They

attend our annual conference. Most of the firms are represented

there, just as they are here at your Conference. The freedom of the

floor at the public sessions is theirs. We hold an exhibition of

weighing and measuring equipment at our conference in which our manufacturers participate. As I say, we have the most friendly

relationships with them, but each side recognizes the division between

our respective interests and responsibilities. Here I would like to

say that the British manufacturers are extremely helpful in our

training program. They have no hesitation whatsoever in sup72
plying lecturers to our classes of students, to inviting them to visit

their works, and to do all they possibly can to assist us. In fact our largest manufacturer in Birmingham, prior to each

Board of Trade examination, runs a full week's course for students

who are going up for the Board of Trade examination. This is

done in conjunction with the local chief inspector, and it is indeed

highly successful. I mentioned earlier on the National Association

of Local and Government Officers and their correspondence course. They, too, hold a mock examination and short practical course the

weekend before each Board of Trade exam. I had the privilege of

visiting that course shortly before I came here, and I was agreeably

surprised at the display oi material they had. I think every manufacturer who had been approached had donated items of equipment.

They are most cooperative, but nevertheless they are not eligible to

be members of the Institute.

As to your question on old legislation, when I said there had been

no major revision for a century, I did not, of course, mean there had

not been amendments from time to time. The oldest act we have

is not quite a hundred years old, 1878. It has been amended in

1889, 1897, 1904, and so on, right up to 1936, with requirements

with regard to the labeling of packages as recently as 1957. But

the principal code of technical regulations under which we work

was issued in 1907. Again these have been amended from time to

time, but it is most difficult on occasion to make the testing of some

of the modern devices fit into the wording of the regulations. It

really is amazing how well they have worked, and I think it is a

great tribute to the foresight of the people who framed them that even in these days of such advanced technological progress we can make these regulations apply to our weighing and measuring devices

or the manufacturers can make their devices conform to the

regulations.

When we have the new weights and measures act, it will be followed, we expect, by brand new regulations. It is intended to modify and modernize all the existing ones and to provide new regulations to cover the devices which at present are not under control.

I hope eventually before I retire to see a full up-to-date code.

Things move rather slowly in Great Britain.

Mr. Wildrick: I was interested in your opening remarks. You

said there were 850 qualified inspectors, excluding Ireland. I wonder about the situation in Ireland.

In Europe we hear they are tough on offenders. Could you explain

the policy in Great Britain ? Mr. Roberts: So far as Ireland is concerned, in the part that is connected with the United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, the inspectors are state employees. They work for the Government of Northern Ireland, and their Ministry of Commerce does have an examination which is very much the same as our Board of Trade

examination. In fact, I understand that at one time the Board of

Trade conducted the examination for them in Belfast.

With regard to the Republic, I am not on safe ground here because, of course, it is an independent country entirely. But I do

know that in certain cities they employ civilian inspectors, and they

too pass examinations conducted, I think, by the Ministry of Commerce of the Republic of Ireland. In the rural districts of Ire73
land the job is still being done by the police. But here again they

do insist, I gather, that their men go to Dublin and take an examination held by the Ministry.

With regard to your question as to the policies toward offenders,

here, of course, we are suffering very much from our antiquated

law, because by our Weights and Measures Acts of 1878, 1889, and

so on, the maximum penalty for a first offender is only 5 pounds.

That is roughly $15, with 20 pounds or $60 for a second offense, but

with liability to imprisonment if willful fraud can be proved.

Under the bill now before Parliament, those penalties will be considerably increased. It will be 100 pounds or $300 for a first offense,

$750 for a second or subsequent offense, with the additional liability

to 3 months' imprisonment with no mention at all of willful fraud.

So if there is a serious violation, even though it may not have been

possible to prove willful fraud, the magistrate can send the offender

to prison.

We have had a lot of trouble in my city with the delivery of solid

fuel, the bulk of the prosecutions being against carters in respect

of short weight. The magistrates have realized that the monetary

penalties are hopelessly inadequate, and when we can prove fraud,

as we can on many occasions, they have no hesitation to send the

offenders to prison, 14 days to 2 months being quite common. We

have had them sent to pirson for 6 months and more where they have

had previous convictions.

Mr. Wrenn : To what extent do you act when you go into a retail

establishment and find slight irregularities, or do you offer educational assistance to try to help the people, assuming that you are not entirely satisfied that there is a deliberate intent to defraud?

If so, to what extent do you help these people comply with your

requirements ? Mr. Roberts: We do that to a very considerable extent. We are not there to take people into court for the slightest violation. We

often given verbal cautions on the spot and send written cautions

when appropriate. All the time we give all the advice and assist- ance we possibly can. Manufacturers and packers are encouraged

to cooperate Avith us, and they do. They are welcome to come

to us when they launch a new product to see if their labels are in

order, or they request us to go to their premises to see that their

packing methods are in line. In general, we do as much as we possibly can by advice and assistance, and only resort to the courts

when there has been a serious Anolation or disregard of previous

warnings.

Mr. Harvey: Thank you, Mr. Roberts. It has been a most inspiring and well presented bit of information. I think we are in a

position now to better exchange our own field of endeavor, and I am

sure that, as a result of what we heard this morning, we will be able

to make considerable improvements.

I would like to suggest that the Conference give Mr. Roberts a rising vote of thanks for the presentation.

(The audience stood and applauded.)

74
AFTERNOON OF W EDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1961 —No Business Session—

OFFICIAL LUNCHEON—WEDNESDAY, JUNE 14, 1961

(R. E. Meek, Chairman, Presiding)

ADDRESS

By Hon. Philip A. Hart, U.S. Senator, Michigan

The story of weights and measures is the story of civilization it- self. The ancient cultures of China, Egypt, Rome, and Greece had

highly developed systems of weights and measures. Such great

names in history as Charlemagne, William the Conquerer, Henry the

Eighth and Talleyrand instituted far-reaching reforms reflecting

their awareness that civilization could not prosper and advance without precise weights and measures. The French Revolutionists began

their reform of weights and measures while the guillotines were still doing their work.

In our own country, George Washington in his first inaugural

message urged Congress to exercise the power given it by the Constitution and promptly fix weights and measures. It is interesting,

indeed, that the founding fathers, although reserving most powers

to the States, specifically set forth that this particular power should

be exercised by the Congress.

The Bible makes numerous references to weights and measures of

which Proverbs 11:1 is typical: "A false balance is an abomination

to the Lord, but a just weight is His delight."

It is important to appreciate fully the historical significance of

your work for two reasons : First, because you are, in fact, custodians

of the tools from which the vigor of our present society has been

shaped. Second, because in our society where easy credit is a current phenomenon and the credit card has in many cases replaced

the dollar as a medium of exchange, the importance of honest weight

and measurement is often lost from sight. I suspect you find this

to be a continual source of dismay and discouragement as you pursue your daily tasks. You often deal with fractions of ounces and

pounds. And when you insist that a designation be accurate, you

are likely to hear the expression, "so what" instead of "thank you."

It is necessary to understand the historical significance of weights

and measures and their importance to every branch of industry,

commerce and science if we are to proceed with vigor and directness

to answer those who would "so what" this society into a state of

complacency and decay.

Your heritage is the most refined, advanced system of standards in

the history of man. Your duty is to guarantee that these standards

are followed and adhered to in the market place. Your privilege is to plan, build and improve for future generations.

This task faces a greater threat today than at any time in the

history of this country. This threat results from the general tone

of morality existing in today's world as reflected in the market place.

Too often "what can I get away with" has replaced "is it right or

613254—61 6 75
wrong, honest or dishonest." Too often we see a producer, for instance, penalized for a forthright declaration of package content,

while his competitor gains a trade advantage by not being so forthright.

Morality in this regard, I should point out, means not only the

condition of our own souls. It means the preservation of this free

enterprise economy as we practice it in America today.

However, I'm convinced that people are not any different now

than they have ever been. We have always had the knaves among

us, those who would not hesitate to extract an additional penny from

their fellow man by over-reaching or deceit, But conditions have

changed. It's easier today.

When the butcher was caught with his finger on the scale, the

housewife was outraged. This was cheating. Once detected, it was

easily understood. But the techniques for misleading the consuming public are today subtle and refined. They are not so easily

detected and even when detected, their effect is not easily understood.

Which brings us to the point of why I happen to be here today.

If some of you have not asked this before, I'm sure you are wondering it now.

Recently the Senate Antitrust and Monopoly Subcommittee was

authorized as follows:

Under the direction of Senator Hart to examine, investigate and make a complete study of the nature and extent of trade practices affecting consumers in a manner which tends or may tend to restrain competition . . . with particular

reference to deceptive, misleading, fraudulent or unfair practices in the production, processing, packaging, labeling, branding, advertising, statement of

prices and other conditions of sale, marketing and furnishing of goods and

service to consumers. Now this is a rather broad grant of authority. My staff and I considered this problem carefully and the answer clearly pointed to

the field of packaging and labeling. Frankly, this would not have

occurred to me before we started the study. On the other hand,

after cursory inquiries, the great need for illumination in this broad

field became obvious.

Pre-packaging as we understand it today is a relatively recent

phenomena, having mushroomed only in the past 10 or 15 years

with the demise of the neighborhood grocery and the rapid take- over by the giant supermarket, stocking as it does approximately

6,000 items, including various sizes in the same product.

It is estimated that today's consumer may spend up to $850 million dollars a day for such products. It is further estimated that

packaging of such items has become a $10 billion a year industry.

This represents a large share of our gross national product.

Yet our economic system still demands that the consumer make a rational choice in the market place among the 6,000 items vying for

her attention and money. This is the decision which in our econ- omy determines what goods shall be produced and in what amounts.

Can she make such a decision in today's market place? Are the

packages and labels designed to aid her in performing this vital

economic function by giving her useful information to guide her, or do they give a false and misleading image of the quantity and price

of the product inside? As she walks through the supermarket aisles

" J
at 60 feet per minute, is the shopper ahle to read and understand

labels and packages, to compare prices?

And how is the producer affected whose package is designed to

give clearly stated information in competition with one who does

not ? I'm frank to say that as yet we don't know the answers but we

certainly hope to find out. Meanwhile, the complaints pile up.

From Chicago:

As a pensioner, who must subsist on $84 per month, (and there is an army

of us) my interest is a little more than academic in, let's say, the conventional

1-pound can of hash, which supplies me with two meals, when to my dismay

I find it to contain only 15 oz. or less. From Detroit :

. . . My head is in a whirl when I get home from a day of computing relative values on vast numbers of grocery items . . . For example, I have to stop

and figure out whether it's cheaper to buy 6/99$ small cans of frozen juice

(orange) or 2/43$ large cans.

It is my opinion those responsible should be satisfied that I spend my money

in the store and keep the children quiet and orderly while there without the

added hardship of these little math tests. From California:

We have run into a problem in our ru athematic book. We cannot figure out the

sizes of canned food cans. Can you explain ? Thank you. From Pennsylvania

. . . Another question which bothers me would be why the smallest size is called

large ; the next smallest is called giant ; and the next called king size?

And a personal observation : I am curious to know why the jumbo

half quart now seems to have replaced the traditional pint.

Another long list of complaints concerns products on which it is

next to impossible to find the net weight designation, because, for

instance, it is on the bottom panel blended into the background.

Such placing and size of the net weight content or package count

often corresponds with a drop of the contents in the package. Maybe

the practice is not as prevalent as the complaints indicate. Perhaps

there are good reasons for such changes. Maybe these practices do

not really confound the purchaser. I hope that by the time your

next annual convention rolls around we may have some of the

answers. If you will permit me one last reflection: This afternoon you will

hear an address by J. H. Chaloud, Associate Director, Product Development Division, The Procter and Gamble Company on the

subject of Quantity Control at Procter and Gamble. I'm sure you

will be very much impressed by the very commendably complex and

thorough procedures used to guarantee that the housewife gets the

amount set forth on the package.

Yet, what is the effect of these complicated controls by the production personnel when the housewife is not able easily to tell from

the package or label exactly what amount she is getting and what

price she is paying for it compared to other brands and sizes? My

only point is that to get full value from this type of production

control, it is equally important that this type of care and research

be carried over into the design of packages and labels to the end

that the consumer can be properly informed.

77
You have years of experience in your job and know far better

than I the problems involved. That's why we appreciate so much

the cooperation we have received from State and Federal weight

and measure officials and why we look forward to your continued

help.

The job you do is so essential to the vitality of our economic system that anything less than your finest effort would be highly damaging. Based on your accomplishments to date and your plans for

the future, I have the greatest confidence in your ability, competence

and dedication in getting done this too often unsung job.

Now that I have an opportunity to assist with these compelling

problems, I hope I can measure up to the standards you gentlemen

have set. THIRD SESSION—MORNING OF THURSDAY, JUNE 15, 1961

(H. D. Robinson, Vice Chairman, Presiding)

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON NOMINATIONS AND ELECTION OF

OFFICERS

Presented by C. H. Stender, Chairman, Assistant to Commissioner,

Department of Agriculture, State oj South Carolina

Under the rules of general procedure of the Conference, the

Director of the National Bureau of Standards, Dr. A. V. Astin, is the President of the Conference and W. S. Bussey, Chief, Office of

Weights and Measures, is the Executive Secretary of the Conference.

In selecting the men for offices, as presented in this report, consideration was given by the committee to several factors, such as attendance

records, geographical distribution, Conference participation, and

interest in promoting weights and measures. The Nominating Committee submits the following report, nominating for office for the 47th National Conference on Weights and

Measures and to serve during the ensuing year or until such time as their successors may be elected

Chairman: Robert Williams (Nassau County, New York).

Vice Chairmen: Paul DeVries (Passaic, New Jersey); H. H. Houston

(Colorado); F. F. Thompson (Louisiana); D. M. Turnbull (Seattle, Washington). Treasurer: C. C. Morgan (Gary, Indiana).

Chaplain: R. W. Searles (Medina County, Ohio).

Executive Committee: All of the officers and, in addition, the following: W. H.

Cramer (New Jersey); H. E. Crawford (Jacksonville, Florida); R. I. Cummings (Altoona, Pennsylvania); A. H. Dittrich (New Hampshire); G. L. Johnson (Kentucky); R. E. Meek (Indiana); D. R. Pratt (Santa Clara

County, California); Raymond Rebuffo (Nevada); C. H. Wrenn (Danville,

Virginia); Robert Zierten (Racine, Wisconsin).

C. H. Stender, Chairman

R. M. Bodenweiser

H. N. Duff

H. E. Howard

G. L. Johnson

H. J. McDade

J. I. Moore

(There being no further nominations from the floor, nominations were de- clared closed and the officers nominated by the committee were elected unanimously by voice vote.)

78
WEIGHTS OF FROZEN TURKEYS

By .1. II. Lewis, Chief, Weights and Measures Section,

Department of Agriculture, State of Washington

A preholiday survey of checkweighings made of turkeys at the

retail level in Washington State stores made it evident that there

was much to be desired to assure that the consumer was getting a

fair deal in the purchase of turkeys. At the request of the Director

of Agriculture, five teams of two men each took a comprehensive

look at the net weight of turkeys exposed for sale during the preThanksgiving week in 1958. The conditions we found warranted a

similar action prior to the Christmas-New Year season of that year.

Our checkweighing included both fresh and frozen turkeys. The

checkweighing of fresh birds presented no particular problem. The

checkweighing of the frozen birds was another matter. This brought

up such questions as: How do you determine the tare on frozen turkeys? Is it fair to require the same tare for frozen birds as you

find in the fresh birds? Should a large bird demand more tare

than a smaller bird? "Where is the reasonable dividing point between a small bird and a large bird? What are reasonable tares?

How do we arrive at them?

After some deliberation we decided the best way to get the an- swer was to go to the processors. After several contacts we were

pleased with an invitation to make a survey in one of the intrastate

processing plants. After a preliminary survey by Mr. Fred Mills,

State Field Supervisor, and myself, we decided to make check

weights at various points along the processing line. We were fortunate to be making our survey in a U.S. Department of Agriculture

inspected plant. We received, complete cooperation from the Federal inspector, who readily answered our questions concerning the

process being used by this plant. We asked specifically whether

they were using the usual and accepted method of processing frozen

turkeys. Upon being assured that the plant was one of the best

in the State, we felt we were on firm ground for our survey. After

taking the necessary steps to attire ourselves in the required apparel

to meet the sanitation requirements, Ave were ready to begin.

Our first step was the identification of the birds, so we could follow them through the complete process. This was done by tying a

piece of white bias binding tape 94 inch wide and 10 inches long to one leg of the eviscerated bird. This was long enough to allow the

ends to dangle so the birds could be spotted as they were processed and

passed along the drain chains and work tables. Each of the dangling tapes was numbered with a laundry pencil for individual identification. We positioned ourselves so we could pick birds at ran- dom from the line, make our markings and checkweighings, and

place them back in the processing line for normal handling. The

marked birds were placed in a separate chilling tank, but in all other

respects were handled as the other birds.

Our first checkweight was made at the end of the drain line, where

the birds passed from the eviscerating room to the chilling room.

After marking and weighing the birds, they were placed in slush

ice water to be chilled over night. I will have more to say about

this 24-hour soaking later in this paper.

79
Our next checkweight was made the following morning as the

birds were removed from the slush ice and after the water had been

drained from the tanks for some 15 to 20 minutes. Our purpose

here was to check the effectiveness of the drain line prior to packaging. We made no special effort to remove the clinging ice ; nevertheless, by the time the birds were handled in weighing, there

was very little evidence of ice on the birds.

We then moved quickly to the other end of the drain chain to

check the weight after drainage.

The particular birds that were being processed were scheduled to

be frozen and held for a later shipment to the firms' canning plant

in Seattle. Arrangements were made for 10 of the 20 market birds

to be placed in cartons and labeled so that they would not be opened

until one of our inspectors could be present to weigh the birds as they came from the freezer to check the effects of cold storage. To

better check the effect of freezing with respect to tissue breakdown,

we permitted the processor to wipe the birds inside and out with

paper towels to eliminate the excess moisture.

Thirty-six days later Mr. Mills opened the cartons in Seattle after

they had been transported some 175 miles and held in storage.

The results of our survey, in pounds and ounces, are shown in

tables 1 and 2. As a result of our various contacts and this survey, it was decided

that a conference should be held with representatives of the turkey

processing industry. An invitation was extended to all the known

processors in the State, as well as to certain of the nationwide firms

who were shipping into our State. In the early spring of 1959 the

conference was convened in Olympia to discuss the prepackage tare

problem. Information disclosed that most processors would nor- mally process either hen or torn turkeys at any one time, but not

both in the same run. It was agreed that there was a normal weight

break at 18 pounds. In other words, there would seldom be a hen

turkey that would run over 18 pounds, and most of the torn turkeys

would exceed 18 pounds. As the result of our discussion we arrived

at an agreed upon tare to be allowed on frozen turkeys. On hen

turkeys or birds weighing up to and including 18 pounds, a 2-ounce

tare would be allowed, and on torn turkeys or those running over

18 pounds a 3-ounce tare was to be allowed. On the basis of what

our survey teams had found in the field, the department felt this

was a step in the right direction. I would like to add here that

seasonal surveys conducted since this meeting have shown that in

most instances our processors have been living up to the established

tares wonderfully well.

The fresh turkey situation was another matter. This did not present the problem to the weights and measures inspector that the

frozen turkey did in that it was possible to determine the tare on the

fresh bird. In hopes that further study of processing would disclose a reasonable tare for fresh turkeys, we continued our plant

survey.

Due to the various factors such as drain time, transportation time

and distance, shelf life, and normal weepage, it was found that in

the fresh turkey field it was best to treat this commodity as we

80
>—

1

iary

6

p.m.

—drained

. . . . n

NJ N N) ' NJ O

O O O g

rpi irj rH rH t** rH

csj O

r*

CO 12

oz.

IS)

csj °

O \w

rfN, lO lO

rH rH > Co X o

g«

CU

si

tc to to in co in x x x x x x

CO XrH

CO XCO CO X X

H

O -H CO w5 rH CM

CM CM CM rH CM CM 00

rH CM

CM O O CM CM

> February

5

2:00

p.m.

Bagged

—

frozen

1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 I 1

,

1 1 NJ 1 1 n 5 3 o S S

g o o voo o o

rH rKtr\LO t^N-nx rH CO 00 i-H CO 00

[A CO CO CO CO (fi

1 N

0

r£

CO

CO X

CO X

si si O O

XPOXPO

l>-

CO CO XX

O —i CO CT> rH CM

CM CM CM rH CM CM 00

iH CO

CM

T—1 T-H CM CM

ecember

31

9:50

a.m.

gged

weight

l 1 1 1 1 1

1 ' 1 N 1

1

nj 5 i ° 3 S

rH CO OC3 <-H l>» 00

CO CO CO CO CO CO X! X! X X! X X!

NJo

r<\ CO

T—

1

CO X

CO X

i t SI SI O O

xwxco

-# tCO CO £5

Q

03 pq O rH CO (35 —i CM

CM CM CM H CM CM 00T—

1

CO

CM

rH rH CM CM

rH -r? CO . X! * .SP s CD C. '53 X 03 is Socp r« o • ied

CD Oi Q Q

SI NJ

si si o si si O O x^ O O

©rf^^r^ hiONhCO[>

co co co co co co XXXXXX

O iH CO © i-H CM

CM CM CM rH CM CM

oz oz « :

rix CM

rH

r£

rH

O sio

cot^

lbs. lbs.

CO CO XX

00

.—1 CM

CM

t—i rH CM CM

CP X 03 B oCP i-l o • • CP ©

Q

.SP

'53

T3

CPE

"o3-H Q

SJ I I NJ 1 I t I ONSONNNN ... o c-> „ o o o o

rH CO 00 CO N CO h.

NJ NJ I NJ O O NJ O NJ NJ «S« °sx ° O

ri\ri\v^ t^v\Tl. Xl* CM rH r-\lO «Xr\CN

rH rH CO rH rH CO rH

SJO

NJo NJ

v.00 NJ CO m\

rH rcH l>- cocococococococococococococococococococo XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

O-"M«HNMOC000-H-*c>JWMrtr<NHr(

cMcMcMrHCMCMCMcMCMrHcMCMCMCMCNcMCMcMCMCM

E lo

CP "HH

CP 00

CPpi

cu

!3O

N ° N O vj" O

SJ NJ o o

NJO SJ NJ N) XT? Xff* O sj sj O

-*0"0 -Vx© rH O o o

O O o„ SI O

LO CO <^Xf3\ m\ O , m e-S^

, SJ I

i O si six- O

O c^vj O HHHTfHrlHliJHlHHNmOCH n\Tf 00 rH ©

cococococococococococococococwcococococo XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

OHMOHcMMrlcOOOriTliMtOMcNHMHH

CMCMCMCMCMCMCMCMcMrHcMIMcMcMCMcMCMcMCMCM

O

uV r* X 03

CP ° Q

(P CP

-r5 C

03 .S PH

X

.SP

"53

is T3

<p

CO

CO

CP

In Q

o

I I n i . . i eg ftq n . i i ; i i i i n . i i i^is O^wNOOOKiSlNjsNNNONiSlNO

° O °^xN^ o o o g o o o o o o XN

TH CCXLO ^\0 rH O CM H\ri\T)< MXr.\rH\rHXTH «fX^XrH\0 HOCHlOHHrtHNHiHlONOlCSHCOcMOOH

cocococococococococococococococo'cocococo XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

CSOCNOlOrfOJacNOOOCOCKNCMOOCMOO

rHCMCMrHCMCMCMrHCMrHCMCMCMCMCMCMCMcMCMCM

rHCMMT«L0CC0l^00CC»OrHcMC>0THL0COI>-00c35O

rHrH-HrHrHrHrHrHrHrHCM

81
So

J2 0

T3

T3

43is

o3 H

43

03

03-0^

b.n o3 (N

J.S-2

^5t3

03 S 4>

03 XI

ao

o

as .s g M «3 £

o.£ . §or

01

£ o3 CD T3 O

> 03 ® H

r-. i i (u a r5 gi! S

2 >-> 'd

o3 a

2o

JO O

0

o>

XI

o>bD

b.0 o3 PQ

o>bO

03 03

4> N .+= O

S-H

i T3 bfl o3 2, a -a w

u o —

2 IH

CO .

>- £ 43 . X 03 SoOi lO

0> 03 q

X3

_bO

'53

0>bD

bO

03 m

o3 to uis0} 43 0) 2 -a n wj^-S to i- o o3 o> £ -h O <n ji

rH rH <!

o>

S 2

CD c3

CO . n £ 43 . X 03 £o43

43 Oi q

_bC

'53

T3

o> q

'3 2

N

0>

bfi

43 O) 2

h -g 7J, M O Cj S ^.S

O rH

o>

is

CO . £

X o3 £ io

43 rH q

_b.o '53

Es

o>aq

to

.3 , 03 2

4) 0) o> 2

° I § 3 £

(NH<!

o> H. X o3 £ to

0> H< °

0) ~00 q

+=

,x3 _bO

'53

T3

03 o

to

2'3 2

4> Oi 0) 2

h- - S3 £

o p ON 5

<M rH •<

O

_Q 03

4) °. q

0) 43

X3

.SP

'S3 N to O'C

to (M 03 43 h

-Htoofg^

©f-Hj*

(N (M <

O

r^

82
would any other prepackaged commodity on which a tare could be

established at the time of inspection. (See tables 3, 4, 5.)

I am sure my first reaction of incredibility to the results of the

24-hour soaking: process was one that has been experienced by a great number of weights and measures people. The first conclusion

was that it must be a local method with the solution to the problem being the responsibility of our own jurisdiction. Upon learning

the slush-ice-water tank bath was an accepted method, we then tried

to determine why. It did not take much research to learn that the

U.S. Department of Agriculture, in their "Regulations Governing

the Inspection of Poultry and Poultry Products" (Title 7, chapter 1,

subchapter D, Part 81, sec. 81.50), set up certain requirements and

standards for chilling poultry of various weights. Birds under 4

pounds must be chilled to 40 °F. or lower within 4 hours; birds 4 to

8 pounds to the same temperature or below within 6 hours; and

those over 8 pounds within 8 hours.

This section also provides that such poultry shall be maintained

at 40 °F. or below until removed from vats or tanks for immediate

packaging. It further provides that "Poultry which is to be held

in chilling tanks in excess of 24 hours shall at the end of the 24-hour

chilling period be removed from the tanks and repacked in clean

ice in clean tanks which are continually drained, or as an alternative,

the tanks shall be drained and re-iced and placed in a cooler which

will maintain all of the poultry in the tank at a temperature of

40 °F. or below."

Still suffering from our first reaction, we felt there must be some

reason why this method, which induced moisture, was acceptable by

the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Federal Food and Drug

officials who are concerned with adulteration. Sanitation requires

the use of only potable water in the chilling process which possibly

precludes any inference of adulteration.

We appealed to our Washington State University for assistance

in this matter, and they furnished us with reports of studies made

by a team made up of Spencer, Matson and Stadelman of the University and M. C. Ahrens of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

These three reports were entitled

1. The Effect of Cooling and Freezing Procedures on Consumer Acceptability

Factors of Turkey Meats.

2. Cooling and Freezing Pan-ready Turkeys.

3. Poultry Meat Cooling and Freezing Study.

There was an additional report on "Cooling and Freezing Characteristics of Eviscerated Turkeys" made by a team consisting of

Spencer, Matson, Eklund and Sauter.

These reports compared the relative end results of such chilling

methods as:

1. Ice water.

2. Drained snow.

3. Air-cooled birds wrapped in wet canvas shrouds (chilled in walk-in forcedair cooler at 34 °F.).

4. Air-cooled birds in polyethylene bags (chilled in walk-in forced-air cooler

at 34 °F.).

5. Quick freezing treatments in a walk-in freezer with unit blower and

evaporator. These were checked at three different temperatures : 0 °F., —20 °F.,

and —40 °F.

83
S3

s

a.

t5S

6Q

«

J

H

OSOS

00

CM>

o

£o

o

03 H

o

.3

^1oj

S3 TJ

CP .3

.SP '3

C5 OS

>

O

a

os

OSoCM>

o

in *3

CB -3 co O

-a

cp ,3

bp "3

•a

CP

co

via>o

O(-1 Ph

as

2 Coo

cp cp -os

T3 0>

CP co J;

r; 81 3

so o to "cp tt"3

bD

_gco"~

Is • »o O > OS OH

o

CP

•a co

cu cm os

bp .us

bp > os 5 o >-i «S5

T3 —1 0J CM OS

bC . to

be > os ^ ° ^

-a r-T £<^Os

.3 iO

03 > OS

tn O i-H

T3 ,_i CP CM OS

33 . •3 >as

03 (M OS o > OS O '

cp

6

3

+++7 I 17 11

1—1 1—1 tN <—

X-* x^l* V.OJ vJJO \oo (NHNHf)

o

CO 00 O 1> O CO O

~ r*- co as 00 as

•H. 1-H T—I T—I 1—t 1—

CSOONH

£ t~- CD OS 00 OS

1—I 1—I 1—

1—1

co i-< CO 1—1 "4* l>- N 1—1 1—1 1—

o

; t- CO OS 00 OS

ss: ^ lO CM OS Tfl i-H

OSrtOt^CN

o HHH ^

co as as os

I- TjH 00 lO CO

OS —1 o t- CM

-JlO~HiO00 CMCOi-ilOcM

t^- CD OS 00 OS OS-hONCM

1-1 (N CM 1-1 (N

Q 1—1 1—1 rH

S f~- r- os as os

•~ 1—1 i-H 1—1 i-H rH

lO CM 00

as 1—1 o 00 cm

i-H CM CM H CM

CO OS O CO CM

2 CD CD 00 00 00

1—I 1—1 1—I 1—

M

' lO CM tJ< CO

00 O 00 1^ 1-1

1—1 CM 1—1 1—1 CM

HNMThio cot^ooaso

84
vso voo \jr voo x.-r x ti - x j: xp-i \ao \oc W\l--\ At-\l-\N\ rt'.rtSrtSnN CO CN CM —• ND-h tH ri „ r+ (N

O oo -f in * co o o co m oiooco

o o o —c in »—• co cn co co o m

o o m m -* coo?rio cd in o o „ „ _ „ rt _ _ „ _ __ —

n co co Ci ^ oo tt< m m <n <n cm

JVJ ~- o-H in

rH in—I -* ot-H oi-H o coi-H oi-H ooon rH — r-H

-CiOifl't O O ^t< O O O O t~-

^ 3i lO CD ^ O O O O O'vOcON

CM I ^ ~H ~H ^^-(^h^^h ^H^nr-H^H

m O CM O WcNON^ ,-1 in t»

'HQi^iO't CDI^CD^cD O O 1^ MHrHrHrt ^ ,_, ^

l> —< CM * OOOtMO-* O CN 00

o 00 m co oomcom mmoo NrtHHrt ^ ^ 1—H HHHr-

<

—< cm co m ohooao *-h cm co * ^^H^Hr-ii-H 1—< t-H i-H t-H Ol CM CM CM CM

a

§•3

So

a a

a"<u a

£ 3

3 —

S33"

S3 0

03 o ac3 a>

a £

0

be *

Eh

03

!<§

<D 03 a2

DS «

.-< C vi C=3

03 Cj a £

O v,

03

b fe

^ a >,

CS 03^3

5 ^ 3

o o o

H fl) fl

tm o t£ 5/1 be a) &

85
Table 4.

State of Washington—Department of Agriculture—Weights and

Measures Section—Fresh Turkey Survey

The birds listed below were killed on November 18, 1959, processed and shipped November 19. These birds were transported 380 miles and were checked at a warehouse in Spokane on November 23.

Number Marked

weight

Weight out

of bag

Tare

weight *

Lbs. Ozs. Lbs. Ozs. Ozs.

1.2.

3.

4.

5.

6.7.

8.

9.

L0

17

1717

16

17

16

14

14

1717

5

13

9

4

11

15

10

17

17

1716

17

16

14

14

1717

4/

11/

9/2

5

10%

5/

4

12%

8/

6

4%

6/2 5%

4

4%

3%

7%

5

6/

6%

* The tare weight was established by actually weighing the wet bag, soakers and inserts.

Table 5.

State of Washington—Department of Agriculture—Weights and

Measures Section—Fresh Turkey Survey

Survey made in Seattle, Washington, December 16, 1959 at a processing plant

Number

December

16, 1959

Eviscerated

Chilled Drained With

giblets

Bagged Marked

12

3

4

5

6

78

9

10

1112

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25-1

20- 12%...

23-4

21-5%—

23-11

20-12%...

21-14%...

24-2

25-2

15-3/2-.--

20-1/--..

19-12%...

12-2

11- 12/..

12-9/....

12-6%....

12-3%.---

12- 12%...

13-4 11-7

11-3%—.

11- 13/...

13-6/....

12- 14/...

25-15%.

21- 12%.

24-2%..

22-2/..

24-12%.

21- 13%.

22- 13%.

25-5%.-

26- 1 ... 16-/...

20-12%.

20-9 /_.

12-10/.

12-3%_.

13-1%..

12-13_

_

12- 12%.

13-5%..

13-12%.

11-15%.

11-10%.

12-4%..

13- 15/.

13-6%..

25-12%.

21-8%-

23-10%.

21-15%.

24-6%-

22-10%.

24-13%.

25-12—

15-13/.

20-10/.

20-7%._

12-7%-

12-2%-

12-14%.

12-10..

12- 10%.

13- 1%..

13-10%.

11-11%.

11-9%..

12-3%-

13- 13%.

13-4-

26-12%.

22-7/-

24-9%..

22-13%.

25-4/..

22-6%... 23-7/-.

25- 10%.

26-10/.

16-11 —

21-7/-

21-6%..

13-4%..

12- 14%.

13-9%..

1 3-6/-.

13-6..-

13- 13/-

14-7%-

12-7%-

12-4%-

13-% — 14- 12%.

13-15%.

26-12%.

22-8- —

24- 10%.

22-14/-

25-5._.

22-7%_.

23-8%..

25-11%.

26-10%.

16-9%-

21-8%..

21-7%..

13-6%-

12- 15-.

13- 10%.

13-7%..

13-7%-

13- 14%.

14-8%..

12-7%..

12-5%..

13- 1%..

14- 13%.

14-%...

26-7

22-3

24-6 22-9

25

22-2 23-3 25-6

26-5 16-7

21-4

21-2

13-2

12- 11 13-6

13-4

13-3

13- 10

14-4

12-5

12-1

12- 14

14-10

13- 12

86
Charts wort' made to show the comparison of the different methods with relation to (1) cooling and freezing rates, (2) rating of

general appearance. (3) tenderness, (I) percentage change in weight

from fresh bird to cooked bird, and (5) percentage of weight lost

during thawing and cooking.

Based on these studies, the final analysis would indicate the con- sumer is better served by receiving a palatable, tender, nice-looking

bird even when a weight change is involved. The trend to accepting

reasonable variations when caused by ordinary and customary exposure to conditions that normally occur in good distribution practice

and unavoidably result in change of weight or measure points to

the fact that practicability sometimes supersedes holding fast to a

net weight concept. I am sure the processors anywhere will admit

that there is an induction of moisture when the tank chill method

is used; but they will fight to the bitter end for their right to use an accepted procedure which will produce the best marketable

product.

I am as concerned as anyone that the added water costs the housewife the same price as the turkey, and I am convinced that, until a

better method of chilling and preparing frozen poultry is developed,

my responsibility is to see that she is forced to buy as little water

as possible. This demands continued eheckweighing on a spot-check

basis at processing plants that are freezing poultry, as Avell as an

inspection of the effectiveness of their drain lines. I believe it is

part of weights and measures responsibility to work with accepted

procedures to the end that "equity may prevail."

We have concluded that, until a more desirable method of chilling

poultry is developed, we wall live with the slush-ice-water bath

method. From a weights and measures standpoint, the only re- deeming feature that we find in the added weight taken up by the

birds is the fact that in our State most of the producers are paid on the basis of "packed out" weight. From a merchandising standpoint, we can understand that it produces a better marketable bird.

The most valuable product of the effort we spent in our surveys

was the mutual respect gained between the processor and the weights

and measures officials. We learned a great deal about their problems, and I am sure we earned a deeper respect from them for the

job Ave were trying to do. This is another area where modern processing methods point out the fact that demands on weights and

measures personnel are more exacting. The modern trend in merchandizing is removing the black and white decisions farther and

farther into the background. It is no wonder the oldtimers cling

tenaciously to the "net-weight" concept. Sometimes these decisions

without clear-cut lines are difficult indeed.

As weights and measures officials we must be willing to grow in

stature to meet the demands of modern merchandising. This will

require a certain amount of flexibility and still not lose sight of the

prime purpose of our service to our fellow man.

DISCUSSION ON FOREGOING PAPER

Mr. Robinson: Are there any questions?

Mr. Rebtjffo: Mr. Lewis, your studies indicate that you find 3.6

percent of the moisture increase is reasonable. In view of that fact,

87
what is your thinking of the proposal of USDA to consider a 10

percent moisture allowance in packed poultry?

Mr. Lewis : It is true that in a 21-pound 23/^-ounce turkey we

found that the average takeup of 12 ounces indicates an increase of

some 3V2 percent. We also must recognize that there are other processes being used at the present time which induce considerably more

moisture than the ice-slush bath.

It would seem to me, however, that when we get into the area of

permitting 6 percent on a 5-pound chicken, unless there is a biological reason why chickens will absorb more water than turkeys, it

possibly is excessive, even in view of the other types of chilling.

Mr. Fernsten : Mr. Lewis, that was an excellent paper and it bears out some of the things we have discovered in Alameda County,

California. In your paper you referred to allowing the packer to

wipe the bird inside and out. I was curious about that. Your

explanation and the chart helped to develop what difference oc- curred and it appears to me that we must then add 0.7 ounce to

your final tare. That will give you your normal tare for normal

packaging practice. You mentioned this was done to determine the

tissue breakdown and I did not hear any other reference to the re- sult of that.

Mr. Lewis : Mr. Fernsten, there had been some indication to us

that birds held in a frozen state have some tendency to lose moisture, even though they may be packed in polyethylene bags. Possibly you may recall that we found that in birds that were held some

36 days in a frozen state, the gross change, the total change in the

gross weight for all ten birds, was only five-eighths of an ounce. That was one of the things we were trying to determine, whether

there was actually any change due to evaporation or tissue breakdown in a frozen state which was negligible.

Mr. Kennett: With your permission, I would like to make a statement regarding the Department's moisture tolerances for poultry. We have done considerable study on the moisture problem, with

particular emphasis on these new continuous chilling devices which

Mr. Lewis mentioned. We want to compliment him on the paper

that he has just presented. We have similar problems and have

conducted the same type of testing that he reported.

With respect to the different tolerances which are allowed for the

various sizes and classes of birds, we have found that frying chick- ens absorb more moisture than do heavy turkeys when chilled by

the same system. Fryers weighing from 2 to 2y2 pounds will absorb about 8 percent, heavy turkeys about 4i/

2 percent, 4 to 6-pound

turkeys about 8 percent, and 10 to 12-pound turkeys about 6 percent.

We are not sure why this occurs. Maybe the smaller birds are not as well fleshed or covered with fat, but nevertheless this is what

happens when different types of poultry are chilled in the same

manner.

We use as our standard the amount of moisture which is absorbed when chilling is done by the conventional chill tank system,

and our tests are conducted exactly as Mr. Lewis explained, with

the exception that we weigh birds prior to the first washer and the

moisture absorbed as a result of the washer is included in the tol- erances. Therefore, our tolerance of 4i/2 percent on heavy turkeys

88
is in line with the 3i

2 percent which Mr. Lewis reported on, since

the washing process, which is not included in the 33/2 percent, would

raise the moisture figure to 4A/2 percent.

The Department's policy is to allow plants to use an}' chilling

system they desire, so long as the system does not result in the absorption of moisture in excess of the permitted tolerances which are based on standard chill-tank chilling.

Mr. Lyles : Mr. Lewis, have you issued specific instructions to your

inspectors as to what tolerances to allow in the checkweighing of

frozen turkeys in supermarkets at retail and at the wholesale level?

Mr. Lewis : With reference to tolerances, no, we leave that up to

the inspector; however, with respect to tare

Mr. Lyles : That is what I meant.

Mr. Lewis : You might be interested to know that our initial sur- veys, which actually sparked our field survey and in turn sparked

the plant survey, showed there were a number of instances where no

tare was allowed. There were a number of instances where probably a half ounce was allowed. Actually, at the present time, as our men go into the field to checkweigh frozen birds, their instructions are to follow the tares that they establish with the processors, which

were 2 ounces on birds up to and including 18 pounds and 3 ounces on birds 18 pounds or over. And we used those right down the

line, and we found that the processors comply very readily with

these tares that were established.

Mr. Blackburn : Mr. Lewis, the point has been raised on this

21-hour soaking period—within the last 10 days we made a tour of our turkey processors, not in the chicken field but in the turkey

processors, which did the freezing of these same birds.

Incidentally, their line processors are using the brine freeze process after the draining period. We were wondering if all of the

processors are using a 21-hour soak. These processors report to us on a full day's production that they start their killing in the morning and are starting their actual packing operation after the soaking

period after about a 5-hour period. On their half-day operations

they are killing in the afternoon, packing the next morning, which

is resulting in about an 18-hour soaking.

Incidentally, the tare weights which Mr. Lewis has mentioned a

couple of times seem to be pretty well in line with those which we

have found within our jurisdiction.

Mr. Lewis : Would you restate your question please ? Mr. Blackburn : We were wondering if the plants are tending in

your areas to operate on a 21-hour soaking basis in their tank-slush

process for the coming year.

Mr. Lewis: I think we have to recognize the fact that a great

number of plants are going to the new type of processing, which is

the tumbling or spinning type, and actually it is to cut down over- head, and so forth. There are a number of plants in our State that

are still using the slush-ice-water bath tank method.

But naturally they are cutting down overhead. They are going

into these spin-chilled, tumble-type chills. They are inducing more

moisture, and it is becoming more and more of a problem, plus the

fact that there are some instances where smaller birds are in the

chicken processors. We find they are prone to place these spin89
chilled chickens right into the freezer. They are freezing quite a

lot of excess moisture, we feel, in the bird, so we are far from out

of the woods on the problem. It is something we have to keep under

constant surveillance.

Mr. Kaymund: Mr. Lewis, why do they use such a drain line?

Why could not the drain line be extended and drain the turkey better before it is packed? I notice that some of the packing plants

that we have been in have the turkey on the drain line a very few

minutes before it is put on a scale and weighed. Why not have a longer drain line? Would not that affect it?

Mr. Lewis : We feel in Washington that very definitely it will

affect it. We feel it would be well in all instances to be sure that

the drain line is of adequate length, and I might say here that in

the surveys we ran we found that there was quite a difference in the

length of the drain line. As indicated in my final chart, when- there

was a mechanical failure in the Seattle plant and the birds were

on the line probably twice as long as they normally would be, they

found quite a definite difference in the amount of moisture or the

actual uptake, indicating that there is an additional drainage.

Of course, they have their problems, naturally. There is a point

there somewhere they feel they haA^e reached the maximum drainage, but we definitely feel that longer drain lines are quite desirable

and probably might be worth consideration of the Federal people

in their regulations to establish a minimum drain period.

BREAD TOLERANCES

By W. M. Schieb, Maintenance Instructor, American Institute of

Baking, Chicago, Illinois

Bread has been, and is today, an important part of man's daily

diet. Through the centuries the mysteries of wheat flour have

challenged man's quest for an answer to its endless variables and

nutritional abundance. The ancient baker and his modern counterpart have learned that bread's basic and principal ingredient, wheat

flour, is as variable as are the four seasons and is as impossible to

predict. Yet, the baker, in order to achieve the distinct character,

quality, and uniformity of his product, must continually face the

challenge of flour variables by adjusting flour blends, bread formulas,

and machine settings. This requires the skill of a craftsman and

the talents of the scientist and laboratory technician which when

combined is frequently referred to as the "art of baking." My mission is to tell you something of these variables and some of the

complexities and limitations in controlling them.

At the outset, let me define the baker's position clearly in regard

to his attitude on the proper and uniform weight of his bakery

products. No one recognizes more than does the baker that accurate

weighing and measuring devices are essential to producing quality

products at efficient levels. Weight inaccuracies represent waste and

lack of production control that eat into profits and may even lead

to financial ruin. However, the answer to uniformity, quality, and

weight control is not solved by accurate scaling and measuring

devices alone. Every machine and process in the baking production

90
line can contribute to variables which will affeci the total character

of his product.

By no means will I attempt to cover the entire scope of baking

variables, and how they contribute to varying the end products and

their weights. Instead, I will confine my discussion to the principal

i areas that affect uniformity and weight control.

First, let us acquaint ourselves with the process of baking bread.

Basically, there are two commonly used systems for baking bread.

One is called the Straight Dough Method and the other is called

the Sponge Dough Method.

The Straight Dough Method is a one-step system in which all of

the ingredients are mixed together in one single operation.

The Sponge Dough Method requires two distinct steps which involve, first, the mixing of a part of a dough consisting of 50 percent

: to 75 percent of the total flour, the yeast, malt, and enough wT ater to

result in a stiff spongy dough. The sponge is then allowed to

ferment from 2 to 5 hours (depending upon the fonnula and product

requirements) . After fermentation has begun, the sponge or dough

remains live and continues to ferment through each process and

machining stage until it reaches the second chamber in the baking

oven. It is this live, action of fermentation that must be closely

controlled by precision control of time and temperature if the product is to be desirable and uniform. From the fermentation room

the sponge is returned to the mixer, where the shortening, milk,

sugars, salt, and other ingredients are added and mixed into a final

dough stage.

This paper will not concern itself with other systems of breadmaking, but will confine its discussion to the Straight-Dough and

Sponge-Dough Systems, since these are the most commonly used.

The area of greatest concern for the machinability of a dough to

accomplish a uniform product of standard quality and weight is the

"makeup" area. The names and functions of the machines in this area are, in their order, as follows: The Dough Divider cuts the

dough into defined sizes ; the Rounder kneads and rounds the dough

pieces; the Intermediate Proofer provides a short resting period for

further fermentation and development to prepare the dough pieces

for final machining through the molder, where they are sheeted,

rolled, formed, and put into pans. This is a completely mechanized

operation that consistently demands a dough of uniform mass,

texture, grain, gas distribution, and structure. Almost every variation of a dough's character will effect a change in the settings and

the products of these machines. The most sensitive to these variations, as it affects final dough weights, is the Dough Divider. It is this machine upon which the baker depends for minimum variations

of final loaf weights.

In order to appreciate and understand something of the conditions

factoring the weight variables in the finished loaf, and the limitations for their control, we must know something of the complexity

of dough development and the principle of operation of the Dough

Divider.

To obtain a properly mixed dough, it is necessary that complete

attention and control be given to correct formula balance, weighing

of all ingredients, blending, temperatures, and time cycles. Proper

mixing of a dough cannot be obtained if the fermentation and the

613254—Gl 7 91
absorption of the dough are allowed to vary. Doughs properly

fermented and mixed will have a balance of gas production and

gas retention. The uniform dispersion of these "bubbles of gas"

throughout the dough structure is vital to the proper machining

of the dough piece and the appearance and uniformity of the finished product. Gas production affects quality, flavor, volume, and

weight uniformity. Gas retention is the ability of the dough piece

to retain the gas produced in fermentation. It must be remembered

that, once the highly complex system of fermentation has begun,

the dough becomes a living mass undergoing continual expansion.

The rate of expansion of a dough is dependent on the rate of gas

formation due to fermentation and the permeability of the dough

which jDermits some of the gas to escape. Fermentation rate itself

is dependent upon many factors, including temperature, the amount

of moisture in the dough, the concentration of water soluble materials such as salt and sugar, the supply of nutrients which is controlled by enzyme systems outside the yeast cell, and finally the

elaborate series of enzymatic reactions within the yeast cell required

to convert a simple sugar into carbon dioxide and alcohol.

Since the yeast produces heat by its action, the temperature of the

dough is dependent not only upon the external temperature, but

also on yeast activity. The retention of gases by the dough is dependent upon factors not yet understood which seem to influence

the permeability of the cell walls.

A dough in which the gluten has attained a state of maximum

gas retention, elasticity, and springiness is considered mature, but as previously stated this is not a static condition and, if the time and

temperature factors are not closely controlled and adhered to, this

changing mass of dough will continue to change markedly. The

closer the time and temperature factors are controlled, the narrower

will be the margin of variation of dough character and density.

The Dough Divider is designed to "scale" dough pieces by volume.

In order to do this, the dough must be fed to it at a constant rate. If the dough had uniform density and elasticity from the beginning

of the batch to the end of the batch, precision at the divider could

be obtained. However, because of the variable elements of dough

development and the factors of fermentation, we must accept an

ever changing condition of dough character, density, and elasticity.

This requires continuous checking of dough weights on a scale and

continuous correction of the volume control of the divider pockets

and pistons by the ojierator.

Figure 1 shows a Dough Divider of a type used in the production

of breads for wholesale distribution. This is a 5-pocket divider with

a variable speed capacity up to 20 strokes per minute. For each

stroke the 5 pockets and pistons will measure and cut 5 pieces of

dough of a set volume as determined by the dough weight required

and the dough density. Thus the operating speed of this divider

may be as high as 100 pieces per minute and may be as little as 50 pieces per minute. Dividers are constructed in sizes of from

one pocket to as many as 8 pockets per machine, with speeds as high

as 25 to possibly 30 strokes per minute, or 200 to 240 pieces of dough

per minute. In this illustration the Dough Divider is shown

equipped with an automatic Dough Hopper Gate Control. A batch

of dough delivered to this hopper would weigh perhaps 1,600 pounds,

92
Figure 1. Dough divider.

and the gate is designed to modulate up and down so as to keep the

dough feeding into the Divider Hopper flowing at a constant rate

and pressure. The divider scale for spot-checking the actual weights

of the dough pieces is conveniently located at the discharge side

of the machine.

In Figure 2 the Divider Pistons are clearly shown. This is an

8-pocket divider with a capacity of 200 dough pieces per minute.

The range of dough-piece sizes may be as small as 8 ounces to as large as 36 ounces of dough of average density. Each of the divider

pistons may be individually adjusted so that all pockets will scale

equally within the design and operating limits of the machine.

Figure 3 is a drawing of a side view of a basic Dough Divider

whose primary function is to divide equally a dough into pre-set

volumes or weights per pieces. Keep in mind that the density of the

dough will determine the volume of the individual dough piece.

93
Figure 2. Divider pistons.

The density of a dough is at its greatest at the start of each dough

batch, and therefore the volume of each piece is smaller than the

dough pieces cut at the end of each batch, when the density is less as a result of the continued fermentation of the live dough. Thus,

throughout the batch, dough pieces must be checked and adjustments for volume and weight made.

The uniform volume of each dough piece from each of the divider

pockets is dependent also upon the uniform flow and pressure into

the dough chamber and the proper lubrication and slip of the dough

into the chamber. This flow of the dough through the divider

depends upon gravity and vacuum. The vacuum is derived from

the action of the ram and the seal supplied by the lubricant, the

dough, and the closely fitted parts of the machine. The dough

94
Figuee 3. Divider—side view.

(1) Divider dough hopper

(2) Knife

(3) Ram

(4) Dough chamber

(5) Rotary head

(6) Piston

(7) Piston stop adjustment lever

(8) Pocket

(9) Conveyer

enters the divider hopper through the gate of the dough hopper and

slides into the dough chamber when the knife and ram are at the

open position. When the dough chamber is filled, the knife comes

forward and cuts the dough and at the same time isolates the dough

in the dough chamber from the dough in the divider hopper above

it. Then the ram, with uniform pressure on the dough, moves forward to push the dough into the divider pockets to the pre-set

volume prescribed by the operator. For these pockets to be completely and uniformly filled, the dough must be uniformly distributed ahead of the ram. The gassy and spongy nature of the dough

95
makes this difficult to accomplish because the filling of the dough

chamber is dependent upon vacuum produced by the movement of

the mass. After the pockets are filled, the dough is then sheared by

the movement of the divider head. When the pistons are in a discharge position, the pistons will move forward into the pocket pushing the dough out onto the belt conveyor below.

The accuracy of the weight of each of the dough pieces so "scaled"

is also limited by the mechanical condition of the divider parts and

the uniform distribution in proper quantities of the divider oil

lubricant. Loss of vacuum, or dough leakage due to poor lubrication or worn parts, will affect the accuracy and uniformity of the dough

pieces. Higher speeds, necessitated by requirements for volume production and lower manufacturing costs, also have an effect upon the

"scaling" efficiency of the machine. At the higher speeds it becomes

increasingly difficult for the operator to spot-check weights of the

dough pieces and make machine corrections at the same frequencies

that he could at the lower production speed levels.

To demonstrate the difficulty of accurate control of dough-piece

weights as a result of these conditions native to the production of

bread, one of our industry's large bakery operators made a study of

finished and packaged bread weights as compared with the scaling

weight settings at the Divider.

Table A shows the results of a check on the final bread weights

after packaging of 100 loaves produced at Plant "A." The label

weight on the package was 24 ounces; the scaling weight at the divider was set for 27% ounces. The dividers and bread formulas in

the studies made for each plant were the same. In this record we

see a finished weight range from a high of 25 ounces to a low of

23% ounces, with an average net of 24% ounces for the 100 loaves.

Table B illustrates the results obtained in Plant "B" for the

same product. The high net weight recorded here was 24% ounces and the low 23!/8 ounces, with an average net weight for the 100

loaves checked of 23.9 ounces. Table C shows the results of the check made at this company's

Gulf Coast Plant "C." The net high for the finished packaged loaf

recorded was 2514 ounces and the low was 23% ounces, and the

average net weight for the 100 loaves checked recorded as 24.67 ounces. Table D records the findings of the tests made at their North

Central Plant "D." The high net here was 25y2 ounces and the

low 23% ounces, with a net average of 24%6 ounces for the 100

loaves checked.

It should be mentioned here that the baker must allow for further

losses of weight in his product after dividing. These losses in the

weight of a loaf of bread are caused by the losses of vapors and

gases due to additional fermentation occurring in the process of

proofing. This is the process of the dough raising in the pan. Additional losses will occur in the "oven spring" or continued fermentation during the first stage of the baking process. Added to this is the moisture loss due to the baking of the loaf, which the baker

refers to as the "bakeout loss." This is followed by the requirement

for cooling the loaf from internal temperatures of 210 °F. down to

95 °F. for slicing and wrapping, which causes an additional loss of

moisture and aromatic vapors. These losses are variables too

96
Table A

Weights In ounces of 100 loaves selected at random

from packaging room. Scaling weight 27H oz., label weight 24 oz., baking time 24 minutes in tray oven. Loaves weighed after wrapping.

24$ 24 1

, 24% 24 23%

24 >; 24 24% 24 24%

23% 25 23% 24% 24

24 24 24% 24% 23%

23% 24% 24 24% 23%

24 24% 23% 24%

24' •> 24% 23% 24 24

25 2-1 1

• 24'

s

23% 24

24 24' i 24 23% 24%

24% 24% 23% 23% 23%

24 24 24 24% 24%

23% 24 24 24% 24%

24 24% 24% 24 24%

24 24% 24% 24% 24%

243% 24% 24% 24% 23%

24% 24% 24 24 23%

25 24 24% 24% 24%

24 24% 24% 23% 24

24% 24% 24% 24% 24%

24 23% 24 24% 23%

Weight of 100 loaves: 2415H ounces. Average net weight per loaf: 2i\i ounces.

Table B

W'eights Id ounces of 100 loaves selected at random

from packaging room. Scaling weight 27 oz., label weight 1 lb. 8 oz., baking time 24 minutes in 110' tunnel -traveling oven. Loaves weighed after wrapping.

24%

24%

24%

24

23%

24

24%

24

23%

23%

23%

24

24%

23%

24%

23%

23%

24%

23%

23%

Weight of 100 loaves: 2390J6 ozs. fl49 lbs. 6J6 ozs.) Average net weight per loaf: 23.90875 ozs.

Table C

Weights in ounces of 100 loaves selected at random

from packaging room. Scaling weight 27J.4 ozs., label weight 1 lb. 8 ozs., baking time 23VS minutes in converted diathermetic oven to direct fire 34 tray. Loaves weighed after wrapping.

24%

24%

24%

24%

24%

25%

25

23%

24%

24%

24

24

24%

24

25%

24%

25 25 24% 24%

aO 9^U

24% 25 24% 24%

24% 25% 24% 24%

25 25 24% 24%

25% 24% 24% 25%

24% 24% 24% 24%

24% 24% 24% 24%

24% 25 25 25%

24% 24% 24% 24%

24% 24% 24% 25

25 24% 24% 24%

25 25 25 24%

25 24% 24% 24%

25% 25% 24% 25%

25% 24% 24% 23%

25% 24% 24% 24%

25% 23% 25 25

25% 24% 23% 25%

25

24%

Weight of 100 loaves: 2,467 oz. Average net weight per loaf: 24.67 oz.

Table D

Weights in ounces of 100 loaves selected at random

from packaging room. Scaling weight 28J^ oz., label weight 24 oz., baking time 27 minutes in tunnel

oven. Loaves weighed after wrapping.

23% 23% 24% 24% 25 24% 24% 24% 24%

24% 24% 23% 24% 24% 24% 25% 24% 24%

24 23% 24% 24% 24% 23% 24% 25% 24%

23% 23% 24 23% 25 24% 25 24% 24

24 23% 23% 24% 24% 24% 25 25 25

23% 23% 24% 24 24% 24 25% 25 25

24% 24 23% 24% 24% 24% 25% 24 24

23% 23% 24 23% 24% 24% 24% 25 24%

24% 24% 24% 23% 24% 24% 25% 24 24%

23% 23% 23% 23% 23% 25 25 24% 24

24% 24 23% 23% 25 24% 24% 24% 25

24% 23% 23% 23% 24% 25 24% 24% 24%

23% 24% 23% 23% 24% 24% 24% 23% 25

24% 24% 23% 23% 24% 24% 24% 24% 25

24% 24% 23% 23% 24% 25 24 24% 23%

23% 23% 23% 23% 25 24% 24% 24% 24

24% 23% 23% 24% 25% 25 24% 24% 25

23% 23% 23% 24% 24% 25 25 25 24%

24% 24 23% 23% 25 24 24% 24% 24%

23% 23% 24% 23% 24% 25 24% 24% 24%

Weight of 100 loaves: 245654 oz. Average net weight per loaf: 24Mo oz.

97
and they contribute to the necessity for broader weight tolerances

than the baker cares to have. He determines in advance through

test baking what these "bakeout losses" will amount to and endeavors

to allow for them in setting the scaling weights at the divider. Such

losses may range from iy2 ounces to 2% ounces or more per one- pound loaf, depending upon the basic formula, equipment used, and

the inherent variables in baking the loaf. Cooling losses may range

from 0.4 ounce to 1 ounce, depending upon types of doughs and

cooling conditions.

A recent study made by an independent baker's service laboratory

recorded the results of variations in absorption and variations in

baking time as they would affect the crumb softness and moisture

loss of the bread.

The first series investigated consisted of six control doughs baked

in a 475 ° oven with variations in baking time ranging from 13 to

25 minutes. Observations were made periodically to determine the

weight loss of the doughs at each variable and the relative crumb

compressibility was determined on the resultant bread.

The results of this test are shown in table 1. The second series investigated was an absorption series with variations in total dough absorption varying from 7y2 percent above

normal to 4 percent below the normal requirements. Weight losses

during the baking process and the final moisture contents of the

bread were recorded as indicated in table 2. The third series investigated a series of doughs baked at 425°

having varied absorptions. The weight losses during baking and

after cooling were recorded. Table 3 records the results of this

series of tests. A study of weight deviation and comparisons using two different

piston designs was investigated in still another study. The weight

variables and inconsistencies are recorded in table 4.

Conclusions

The bakeout losses and cooling losses additively were found to

vary directly with baking time at a given oven temperature. It was

noted that this weight loss increased at the rate of one-half percent

per minute of extended baking time at 475 °F.

The bread moisture was observed as varying directly with dough

absorption within the limits of 58.5 percent and 70 percent absorption and under set baking conditions. The bread baked at 475° for

21 minutes lost an average of 1.7 percent more weight than bread

baked at 425° for 23 minutes.

It sbould be noted that these data were taken under the precise

control of laboratory facilities. The controls in actual commercial

bakery production would vary considerably from that of the laboratory and it can be concluded that these variables and their effect on

the final bread weight could be much greater than those recorded

by these tables.

In each of the first four tables shown the baker found it necessary

to play it safe by scaling his weights with enough overweight to

insure a safe margin in the overall average weights of his product.

To do this, he gave as much as 0.9 ounce of his product away with

each loaf. In dollars and cents per 1,000 loaves sold, it would mean

that his loss would be $10.40 if calculated at a wholesale selling

98
Table I. Variations in baking time.

Effect on aright loss and crumb softness.

Absorption 62.5 percent—baking temperature 475 °F.

Percentage weight loss in oven and in cooling.

Cooling periods

Faking time Average comminit ten In oven 15 min. 50 min. 45 min. 60 min. pressibility 13 6. 9 7. 8 8. 0 8. 5 8. 7 155

15 7. 3 8. 5 8. 7 9. 3 9. 7 154

17 8. 5 9. 4 9. 7 10. 1 10. 4 139

19 10. 0 10. 8 11. 1 11. 5 11. 8 137

21 11. 2 12. 0 12. 2 12. 5 12. 7 325

23 11. 6 12. 5 13. 3 13. 4 13. 5 126

25 12. 9 15. 3 124

Table 2. Variations in absorption.

Effect on weight loss and moisture content.

Bake time—21 minutes at 475 °F.

Absorption Pake out loss Total loss after 1 hr. (%) (%) cooling (%)

70. 0 12. 3 14. 6

66. 5 12. 0 14. 5

62. 5 11. 7 13. 8

60. 0 11. 7 13. 7 58.5 11.6 13.6

Table 3. Effect of variations in dough absorption on moisture content of bread.

Bake time 23 minutes—bake temperature 425 °F.

Pecent Percent bake Total weight loss absorption out loss after 1 hr. cooling 70 8.6 11.5

64 8. 3 10. 8

58 7. 7 9. 7

Table 4. Distribution of individual deviations in weight on 20-ounce bread.

Conventional Piercing rod

Deviations Less than ±0.25 oz ±0.25 to ±0.45 oz ±0.45 to ±0.65 oz ±0.65 to ±0.85 oz More than ±0.85 oz

price of 18y2 cents per pound loaf. At a manufacturing rate of

7.000 loaves per hour, this amounts to a substantial loss of $72.83

per hour. Thus, the baker certainly is interested in any reasonable

means for improving his control over the variable factors of baking

and narrowing down the tolerance latitudes of weight control of his

products. However, until more is known of the basic variables of

his main ingredient, flour, and the practical control of them, he will

have to set broad limits of tolerances for his finished weight.

DISCUSSION ON FOREGOING PAPER

Mr. Rebtxffo: In the surveys described, what type of bread was

used?

Mr. Schieb: This was the common and popular white bread.

99

pistons pistons 1958 1958 27. 3% 30. 6%

25. 8% 22. 6%

9. 1% 22. 6%

13. 6% 19. 4%

24. 2% 4.8%
Mr. Meek : With respect to your statement about bread tolerances,

Mr. Schieb, I would like to call your attention to a discovery made

in Indiana a year or so ago, where a large bakery was baking certain

loaves for interstate shipment and others for intrastate shipment.

The interstate shipment was found to comply with the Federal

Food and Drug tolerance requirements, and the ones baked for the

State of Indiana met with our State requirements, which permit

1 ounce per pound as a tolerance. We brought this to the attention

of the Indiana Bakers Association and they backed a bill in the

Indiana State Legislature which was enacted. It abolished the tol- erances provided in the Indiana law and adopted verbatim the

variations provided under the Federal as well as our State Food

and Drug and Cosmetic Act. Do you not believe that this is a

better approach to this variation or tolerance problem you mentioned than to have stated specific tolerances in the law, such as we formerly had in Indiana?

Mr. Schieb: Yes, this meets the broader conditions of baking

manufacturers. In other words, if we set our tolerances too close

and to too-defined limits in our products, we penalize more than

likely the smaller operator rather than the larger operator, and I

believe that the requirements should be to meet the flexibility reason- ably within the manufacturing capabilities of our entire industry.

Mr. Meek : We found in discussing this problem with the Indiana

Bakers Association that they were very desirous of giving correct

weight. The larger bakers were doing that. We found they wanted

also to comply with our law by baking loaves a little lighter. The

approach now will give us the same protection for our citizens in

Indiana as was heretofore given to people who bought this product

out of the State.

Mr. Jensen: I should like to preface my question with a brief

explanation. Under the Model Law and Model Package Regulation adopted by this Conference, packages of any commodity—food,

drugs, cosmetics, and anything else—are required to average in net

content the quantity stated on the outside of the package. The aver- age quantity must at least equal the stated quantity. Then variations

are permitted both above and below, except that no unreasonable

shortages are permitted, even though these are balanced by overages

in the other packages in the same lot. The question I should like to ask is this: Would the American

Bakers Association favor this type of permitted variation for

loaves of bread?

Mr. Schieb: Yes, in my opinion, I think we would. We would,

of course, want to define what the "reasonable" is. Definitions are

in order. I think it is an aid to the enforcing officers as well as to

the bakers or producers, and these definitions, of course, should be

realistic.

Mr. Matt Johnson : Were these tests run on the old dough process or on the continuous-mixing process?

Mr. Schieb: These tests were run on the conventional dough

process, which is the sponge and dough method. Mr. Johnson is referring to a newer system that is coming into the industry, called

continuous mixing. This is quite an automated system. Its use is

rather spotty throughout the country. One trade name for this

100
kind of bread is called "batter-whip," and the accuracies, incidentally, of weight control here are excellent.

Mr. Johnson : I find that, with the newer process, the bread will

hold the moisture longer.

Mr. Schieb: This' is true, inasmuch as with the batter-whip

method or continuous-mix method, the shelf life of a loaf of bread,

it is said, can be extended from 21 to 48 hours. The retention of

the moisture is a part of that solution.

Mr. Eatmuxd: I recently found that one of our large bakeries

was exercising no quantity control whatsoever at the end of the line.

Should not a large baker have control at the end of the line to

determine whether the bread is correct?

Mr. Schieb : Not knowing the particular baker to whom you refer,

I would say he probably did have a control whereby random pieces

were taken' from the package line back to the laboratory within the

plant or into the production manager's office, and there you would

have seen scales and volume devices for measuring volume, because

to the baker the volume of the bread is important too. Many good bakery operators have installed in the packaging line an alarm system comprised simply of electronic eyes which will

set off an alarm when the volume of the loaf is too small, which

might indicate underweight too, but not necessarily be so. Or when

the volume is too great, it would also indicate the oversized loaf.

Also frequently used on the same line is a scale in which the package

operator would spot check the package at that point. More often

it is done by simply removing the loaf from the line at random

and checking it at the laboratory or the office.

QUANTITY CONTROL AT PROCTER & GAMBLE

By J. H. Chalotjd, Associate Director, Product Development

Division, The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio

We welcome this opportunity to talk to your Conference on the

subject of "Quantity Control at Procter & Gamble." This desire

to describe our quantity control procedures is based on a recognition

of our mutual interest, which is to insure that the consumer obtains

the full measure of service when she buys our product. In a con- sumer-oriented company such as Procter & Gamble, we recognize

the ultimate purchaser and user of our product is our true "boss"

and to serve her well is the basic creed of our company.

In its 124 years, Procter & Gamble has been consistently building

its business on the development and sale of service products. We

are convinced that housewives continue to buy our products because

of the service they perform for her. To build that service into a product, we must do three things. First, we must develop a formulation which will perform the intended service. Second, we must

maintain precise chemical quality control to maintain this formulation. And third, we must be sure that she obtains within the package the correct amount of product so that she will obtain the full

amount of service for which she has purchased this product.

Our interest in supplying to the consumer the proper weight of

products goes beyond what we consider the legal responsibility of

having the average of a lot, shipment, or delivery at the stated net

101
weight or above. We recognize the National Bureau of Standards

Handbook 67 on Checking Prepackaged Commodities has this aver- age concept as its basic philosophy. As I said, however, we feel our

responsibilities go beyond this, for we know that a housewife uses many of our products on a volume basis; for example, a cup and

a half of detergent to do the laundry, or a cup of pancake mix for i making her Sunday breakfast. If our product density is off, then

her performance will be off. If our weights within the package

are off, then she will not obtain the normal number of uses or the

optimum performance, and if this happens often she will quit | buying the product. We respect the housewife's ability to discern

such differences.

We have a written policy within our company which is quoted

directly from the Manufacturing Standards which are given to every

plant as its basic standard and instruction for controlling the fall of a package.

It is the company's policy to fill every package so that the net weight, vol- ume, or count equals the target weight, volume, or count specified in Packing

Standards. Unreasonable shortage in any individual package is not acceptable

and overages and shortages cannot be considered compensatory.

As you can see, it is our purpose to attempt to fill every package

to the target packing weight. It should be explained here that we

do not consider the packing target weight to be the net weight; in

fact, in most cases it is not. As seen later in the development of

our packing control procedure, our packing targets are set so that

we can say with complete conviction our packing target weights are always at or above the net weight.

Even with strict Manufacturing Standards and the best of intentions to fill each package at the target weight, variation nevertheless

does exist and some variation will always exist. It is a fact of life

that no repetitive operation can be clone exactly the same way. For

example, we know the cardboard used in detergent cartons will vary

as much as 14 percent in weight. Even with careful control of the

gluing machines, we know the weight of glue required to seal car- tons will normally vary about 8 percent. The making and packing

of our products are no exception to this problem of variation.

To illustrate this point I would like to mention certain aspects of

making and packing detergent powders which are directly related

to the problem of weight control. Even though consumer packages

are small, the starting ingredients are received in very large quantities. Such commodities as sodium phosphates, fatty alcohols, and

alky] benzenes, all of which are starting materials for the presentday detergents, are received in hopper cars and tank cars from several suppliers in 100,000-pound lots. There are slight chemical

variations and also some density variations in the materials we

receive. Additional density variations result from the process of

making a spray-dried product such as the present-day detergents.

Even though we know of the variations in raw materials and in

the spray-drying process, it becomes our job to control the product

density as close as possible to a predetermined fixed value that will

give the proper packed weights in the package with a minimum

of outage or free space.

We have obtained from equipment manufacturers the best instruments and equipment available for control of product density, and

I 102
have found it necessary to develop other tools of our own, such aa

a continuous density meter and recorder and specially devised

product blenders that will achieve the optimum flow of constant

density product to the packing room. In addition to the automatic

density records, many checks are made of the density of material

as it flows to the packing room. The product bins into which it goes

are segregated with regard to the actual density readings taken, so

that we would be able with proper selection to maintain the most

uniform density of product going to the rilling machine.

The final control of product weight must be achieved in the packing room. Whatever density variations have occurred in our product

through raw materials, process, and filling machines must be recognized here and corrected. The girls who operate the packing line are responsible for achieving the basic aim of the company's policy

in attempting to get the packing target weight into each box. Quite

literally, hundreds of weighings are made each day from each packing line, and corrective action is taken based on these weights.

I believe the best way to demonstrate the practical means of

weight control is to develop a histogram. As the packing girl continues to make many successive weighings, the actual weights of the

product above and below the packing target can be plotted in terms

of units of Vieth of an ounce as is done with this histogram (fig. 1).

As thousands of samples are weighed, our histogram continues to

grow; the top of each of the bars begins to form the typical bellshaped curve or what statisticians refer to as the normal distribution curve. Every product and every package size will result in

just such a distribution around a packing target. We have never

seen any product in our industry or others in which there is not

this same normal distribution form, although the exact shape of the curve may vary. We must first find out through experience with

each product and each type of filling machine what is the shape of

this curve. Knowing this, we can then set the packing target weight

at some value above the marked weight. If the curve is broad and

flat, we must have a large spread between the marked and packed

weights. If the curve is narrow and steep, the spread can be considerably less. As an example, you can see from a typical normal distribution curve for a granular detergent product, we would assign a packing

target at a point above the marked weight so that the number of

individual packages that would be made below the marked weight is kept to a reasonable minimum (fig. 2). We would like to emphasize

from just this curve that the number of packages made below the

marked weight is small when compared to the number of packages

that are above the marked weight. As we gain more experience and

obtain better control of product and product packaging, the shape of

the normal distribution curve might improve. In some cases Aye have

been able to improve our operation so that these curves become more

steep and the concentration of the product weights is closer to the

packing target.

Returning to the packing room, where most of the machines measure the fill by volume, the operators in charge of the line do have

certain machine controls designed to keep this variation to a minimum.

In addition, it is their responsibility to be certain the average of the

packing weight does indeed fall on the packing target. We use an

103
XXX

xxxxx

xxxxxx

xxxxxx

xxxxxxx

xxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxx

X xxxxxxxxxxxx

XXXXXXX XXX XX XX

XX XX xxxxxxxxxxx

XX XX XX XX xxxxxxx

XXX xxxxxxx xxxxxxx

x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

XX xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx XX

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx

-15 -10 -5 0 +5 +10 +15

DEVIATION FROM STANDARD WEIGHT 1/16 02 UNITS Figure 1.

"X-bar" or range control chart which serves to tell the operator when

to make a correction and how much, and, even more importantly, its

proper use will prevent unnecessary variations through overcontrol

(fig. 3). As an operator takes her samples from the packing line,

the weights are recorded on a graph in terms of the sum of three I weighings. The sum of these three weighings is then plotted on the

range chart, which has an upper and lower control limit placed on

either side of the packing target weight. The placement of the range

limits is established on the basis of the normal distribution curve which experience has shown that packing line and product will produce. Whenever an instance occurs in which the sum of the three I weighings crosses either the upper or lower range line, then an immediate correction is made by the operator by turning the hand wheel

on the filling machine head. If the sum of the three weighings falls

between the packing target and the upper range line and a series of

four successive groups plot in this same area, the operator is required

to make another slight adjustment to the filling head so that she would

bring the average of her weighings closer to the packing target. The

range chart is not a mathematical device to compensate overages with

shortages or vice versa, but rather the range chart is a procedure for

bringing the actual packing weights closer to the packing target.

There may be some tendency to believe the variation we find is

due to our desire to operate volumetric fillers at high speed. Quite

obivously, we are eager to use such high speed equipment, for its

cost per package is low. However, we have some products which

are still being packed on slow, net weight fillers. We have the

same information with regard to weight variation and range control chart data on a machine such as this, and we know from experience on dozens of machines of this type that our percent of varia104
HARKED

WEIGHT

PACKING TARGET

WEIGHT Figure 2.

tion in weight is no lower than we obtain from a high speed volumetric

filler. In fact, we even have some operations in which our weighings of

product are made manually for each individual package. Quite

obviously one might feel this should be the most accurate of all, but

packing room data prove that this is not true. Human and fatigue

factors lead to error, and when all of the data are gathered we

find that this is no more accurate in terms of percent of variation

than the volumetric filler. We are convinced that, when all things

are considered, the most efficient machines for each size will lead to

the best control.

Our quantity control in Procter & Gamble does not stop at this

point, for we must be certain the actual packing-room data are

accurate. This is done by the quality control manager in each plant

being responsible for taking frequent but random samples of production as it goes into the warehouse. These samples are carefully

weighed for net weight and serve as the weight record samples for

the plant and its production. Such samples, we believe, are free of

bias and give an accurate picture of the weight control we achieve.

A final step in being certain the customer attains her full measure of product is that each month we go out to a number of stores

within each plant area and buy hundreds of our products and product sizes, so that we can then examine them and weigh them. Our

experience is that the variation increases somewhat through the

exposure of product to different environmental conditions, but we

have data to show that, whatever the circumstances might be, the

average weight of the product purchased in the trade still falls at or above the marked weight that appears on the package.

An audit of our control is made by having an independent purchasing organization buy our products throughout the Nation every

105
>_ I— <

< < cc QQ CD

ZO

H

S

o

X

X

X

X

X

5*

1

< Q-

_1 Ld

CL Q

co csj ^j- co ^a- ao c^J co 70 91/1 S31dWVS

- N0I1VIHVA 1H9IM "IV101

, -4-

11

^1

>

>-

rsY

5 tT

ST

*\

CO

106
6 months. All of these samples are returned to Cincinnati and ex- amined carefully for quality as well as quantity control. Once

more the pattern is as before in that we find the variation has increased just slightly but that the average of the weights has held

remarkably constant, still being always at or above the marked

weight.

We want to reduce weight variation ; in order to do so, we maintain a continuing program of development work on packing equipment. For example, we have a test unit now under study in which

a gamma-ray density detector is used to sense the powder density

prior to going into the filling head of a packing machine and automatically correcting the filling machine head for these variations in

density. Another device is designed to sense the weight of every

package and compute the average or trend and feed back to the

filling machine a control signal to correct for whatever error the

automatic sensing device has found. Obviously such devices are new and experimental, and they Avill have to prove their effective- ness and value before we could justify using them broadly.

No discussion on weight-control procedures would be complete

without mentioning our method of standardizing packing room

weights and calibration of packing room scales. The responsibility

for this function rests with our Cincinnati Standards Laboratory,

which is the central standardizing agency of Procter & Gamble.

This laboratory is responsible for standardizing, certifying, and

checking the instruments and apparatus used to measure the fundamental physical and chemical factors involved in our business.

Just as an item of interest, this laboratory is responsible for the

standardization and maintenance procedures of 2,775 scales and bal- ances throughout the company.

We believe the laboratory is well equipped for this job. It has

four precision balances, ranging from a micro balance with a total

capacity of 1 gram to a bullion balance with a capacity of 66 pounds.

As a primary mass standard, it has a set of Class "M" precision

laboratory weights, certified by the National Bureau of Standards,

ranging from 0.001 gram to 100 grams. As a primary avoirdupois

standard, it has a set of Class "S-l" weights, from 0.1 ounce to

50 pounds, also certified by the Bureau. Our Standards Laboratory,

among its other activities, standardizes, adjusts, seals, and certifies

the various classes and sets of secondary reference weights used in

the different plants and laboratories of the company.

Each plant of the company in the United States has two different

sets of secondary reference weights. Each plant laboratory has a

set of Class "S-l" metric weights, certified at the time of purchase

by the Bureau. These weights are checked and recertified every 3

years by our Standards Laboratory against the primary Class "M"

weights. Each plant also has a set of stainless steel Class "C"

weights, ranging from y32 ounce to 25 or 50 pounds. These are standardized, sealed, and certified by the Standards Laboratory

against their primary Class "S-l" weights. Each plant also has a

small set of stainless steel "Sealer's Weights," Class "C." These

sets of secondary reference weights are used to check and adjust the

various weights, including tares, counterweights, and check weights,

used at the many scales throughout the plant.

613254^61 8 107
Each, plant has an Instrument and Scale Shop equipped and

staffed to maintain, repair, and adjust the instruments, gages, and

scales necessary to our operations. Each shop has a 25-pound

capacity shadowgraph scale, accurate to 14 0 ounce, for testing and

adjusting the packing room weights.

Each automatic filling and packing machine has a scale, generally of 5-pound capacity, used only for checkweighing the packages

of finished product made on that line. These scales are inspected

and tested on a daily, weekly, and monthly schedule, the details of

which were developed with the assistance of Mr. Jensen and Mr.

Wollin of the National Bureau of Standards. In addition, the

scales are maintained in strict accordance to the specifications and r tolerances of Handbook 44. The exact details of the daily, weekly, a and monthly scale checking and testing are included in the appen- s

[ dix titled "Scale Inspection and Test."

In summary, quantity control at Procter & Gamble has been, is,

and will continue to be a matter of continuous responsible concern. We recognize that variation in our product weights does exist, but

we take the position that it is our responsibility to hold this varia8 tion at the lowest possible level. To be sure this responsibility is

always met, each month some 900,000 weighings are made in the

packing rooms for filling machine control, an additional 31,000 [( samples are taken randomly from cases in the warehouse to have ,'; an independent quality check of the accuracy of the packing room

data, and finally some 3,600 packages are purchased from the retail

trade and each one weighed and inspected carefully to be certain

the housewife is receiving the full measure of service she has learned

to expect from these products. It might be of interest to know

this deliberate level of overpack is equal to 3,000,000 pounds of

product each month, or the equivalent of 81 boxcars of extra product

which, incidentally, is a long freight train load each month.

We consider your prepackaged commodity weights inspections as a further and final quality test of the proficiency of the packing

operation. Incidentally, we are grateful to several States who have

sent to our attention the results of all inspections, almost all of which

found the products above the marked weight. Our company believes in working with all weights and measures regulatory groups

as the surest way of obtaining our mutual ultimate aim of giving a

full measure of service to the consumers.

APPENDIX. SCALE INSPECTION AND TEST

For scales used in production checkwei^liinK and quality control. Equal-arm, over-and-under

indicator types

A. Daily inspection and tests.

1. Clean scale and iveights.

Wipe off pans, pan supports, exposed mechanism, beam, poise, and weights.

Remove all dust and dirt. If necessary, wash off pans and dry thoroughly. Do

not get any water on knife edges, pivots, or bearings.

2. Check zero balance.

a. Remove all weights from both pans. Set poises at zero. Stroke one a pan sufficiently to cause indicator needle to swing to one side of zero mark le at least half the scale length. Indicator should return to rest at zero mark.

Repeat to other side by stroking opposite pan.

If indicator does not come to rest at the zero mark, turn the "zero adjust"

108
screw as required. Then repeat the above tests. The scale is in proper

adjustment only when the indicator stops at zero after being displaced. If scale cannot be so adjusted, do not use until it has been repaired.

b. If the tares or poises are fastened in such a manner that they cannot be

removed or set to zero, place a test weight on the load pan exactly equal

to the fixed mass. Displace the indicator and test for return to zero as

above. If necessary, turn the zero-adjust screw as required.

It is essential that the test weight be exactly equal in mass to the fixed

weight, without the use of any tare such as an empty carton. This load- zero balance is not as sensitive nor as reliable as the zero load test, and is to be avoided if possible.

3. Dash-pot adjustment.

With the scale in proper zero balance, depress one pan to the limit of its travel. Release the pan. The indicator should make two complete oscillations past zero and then come to rest at zero in less than one second. If it comes to rest with

fewer oscillations and/or takes longer than one second, the scale is overdamped

and insensitive. If it oscillates back and forth more than twice, the scale is underdamped and unstable. Adjust the dash-pot screw as required.

Note: Sluggishness may be due to other factors than the dash pot. If re- leasing the dash-pot adjustment does not speed up the action, remove the

scale from service for repair.

B. Weekly inspection and tests.

1. General conditions.

Check scale for cleanliness, level, freedom of moving parts, and absence of

foreign objects on pans or mechanism. Check weights for cleanliness and signs

of misuse. Clean if necessary.

2. Check zero balance in same manner as daily test. Adjust if necessary.

3. Check dash-pot adjustment as in daily test.

4. Sensitivity test.

a. Remove all weights and tares from balance, and set poises to zero. Be

sure scale is in proper zero balance.

Using only standardized test weights, place a %6-ounce weight on the load

pan. The indicator should move to the corresponding graduation, or equivalent position on the dial. Move the weight to the opposite pan. The indi- cator should move to the correct position on the opposite side of zero. Place

another %6-ounce weight on the load pan. The indicator must register zero. Remove both test weights.

Place a 2-pound test weight on each pan. The indicator must register zero. Add a i^Q-ounce weight to the load pan. The indicator must move to the

corresponding graduation, or equivalent position, on the dial. Add a %6-ounce weight to the opposite pan. The indicator must register zero. Remove the

%6-ounce weight from the load pan. The indicator should indicate the

proper weight on the opposite side of the dial.

b. If the net weight tares or poises are fastened in such a manner that

they cannot be removed or set to zero, place test weights on the load pan

until the indicator reads zero. The stated weight of the net weight tare must equal the sum of the test weights within -f-%6 ounce. Place %6-ounce weights on each pan and test as given above.

If the dial graduation units are greater than %6 ounce, the sensitivity test weight should be equal to one such unit. If a scale does not meet the requirements of this sensitivity test, it must

be removed from the job for a complete overhaul and readjustment. Sensitivity cannot be restored on the job.

If an incorrect tare is found, it must be adjusted before further use.~-

5. Check net weight tare.

If the net weight tare or counterpoise is out of the above tolerances, it must

store it to the weight pan. Place test weights on the load pan until the indi- cator reads zero. The stated weight of the tare must equal the sum of the

test weights within ±Yig ounce.

If the net weight tare or counterpoise is out of the above tolerances, it must

be adjusted before further use.

109
C. Monthly inspection and tests.

1. Check zero balance in same manner as daily test. Adjust if necessary.

2. Check dash-pot adjustment as in daily test.

3. Sensitivity test. Same as for weekly test.

4. Ratio test, increasing load.

a. With scale in correct zero balance, place the proper counterweights and

poises for the filling target weight in place. Do not use or include any tare equivalent to the empty package. Place standardized test weights on the

load pan until the indicator reads zero. The total of the test weights must equal the target weight within the Ratio

Test Tolerance listed in table 1, and should equal it exactly.

b. Remove the test weights, but not the target tare weight. Bring the

scale zero balance by means of any convenient mass, such as a filled package of the correct net or gross weight. A tare equivalent to the empty package may be used in this test. Place all of the ounce and fractional ounce weights, totalling one pound, on the load pan. Place a 1-pound weight on the opposite pan. Note the

indicator reading. Place a 2-pound weight on each pan. Note the indica- tor reading. In both cases, the indicator must read zero, within the Ratio

Test Tolerances listed in table 1.

5. Ratio test, decreasing load.

With all the weights used in the previous test in place, bring the scale to zero balance, if necessary, by adding any convenient mass as necessary.

Remove the 2-pound weights from both pans. Note the indicator reading. Re- move the 1-pound weight from the weight pan and transfer the 8-ounce weight

from the load pan to the weight pan. Note the indicator reading. Remove

the 8-ounce weight, and transfer the 4-ounce weight from the load pan to the

weight pan. Note the indicator reading. Remove all the check weights and

note the indicator reading.

In all the above tests, the indicator must read zero within twice the Ratio Test

Tolerances listed in table 1. A good scale, however, will be within half the

tolerance on the increasing load test, and within the tolerance on the decreasing load test. If any scale is found in either of the Ratio Tests that equals or exceeds the

allowable tolerances, it must be removed from the job for overhaul and adjustment.

If any incorrect tare or target counterpoise weights are found, they must be

corrected before further use.

6. Shift test.

a. Remove all weights from both pans. Set all poises at zero. Place a standardized test weight, or weights, equal to 50 percent ±10 percent of the

rated capacity of the scale at the center of the weight pan. Stack multiple

weights so that the load is centered on the pan.

Place an equal standardized weight on the center of the load pan. Note the

indicator reading. Successively move the weight on the load pan to not

less than four equidistant points halfway between the center and the edge

of the load pan. Note the indicator reading at each position. Note also

any indications of sluggishness or decreased sensitivity.

Re-center the weight pan in the same manner. Note the indicator reading at each position.

b. If the tares or poises are fastened in such a manner that they cannot

be readily removed or set to zero, the Shift Test may have to be limited

to the load pan. The test weight should be approximately half the scale

capacity. In all positions, on either pan, the indicator must read zero within the Ratio

Test Tolerances listed in table 1. In a good scale, any error will not ex- ceed one-half the tolerance. Any scale with an error greater than one-half,

but less than the whole tolerance should be repaired at the first opportunity.

Any scale in which the error at any position is equal to or greater than the

tolerance must be removed from service for repair.

110
7. Indicator test. With the scale in zero balance, place a test weight on the load pan equal to half the marked capacity of the indicator scale. Note the indiactor reading.

Transfer the weight to the weight pan and note the indicator reading.

Repeat the test on both pans, using a weight equal to the full marked capacity

of the indicator scale. In both tests, the indicator must agree with the test weight within the Indi- cator Tolerances listed in table 1.

S. Beam test. This test is made only on scales where the beam and poise reading is used in determining the mass on the load pan. Place a test weight on the load pan equal to half the marked capacity of the

beam. Move the poise to bring the indicator to zero. Note the beam reading.

Repeat the test at the full marked capacity of the beam.

In both tests, the beam reading must equal the test weights within the Weighbeam Tolerances listed in table 1.

9. Net weight tares or counterpoises. Check as for Weekly Test.

10. Reeheck zero balance.

Table 1. Basic maintenance tolerances for checkweigh scales

Ratio test Weighbeam and Known test load tolerance indicator tolerances

pounds ounce ounce up to 1 1/16 1/16

2 and 3 1/16 1/8

4 to 7, inclusive 1/8 3/16

8 to 14, inclusive 1/4 3/8

15 to 23, inclusive 5/16 1/2

24 to 29, inclusive 3/8 1/2

DISCUSSION ON FOREGOING PAPER

Mr. Cichowicz: You stated that you fill packages with a target

package weight and that this target is above the net weight.

Throughout your whole talk you emphasized the fact that only a small amount of the finished product was found on the grocery

shelves to equal the marked weight and the rest of them equaled

over the marked weight. With the great volume of product that

Procter and Gamble puts out, I am wondering why you are giving

away all this commodity.

Mr. Chaloxtd : Let me say quite seriously that we feel that we

must be sure that the consumer gets what we think is a reasonable

performance in her product regardless of what kind of errors we

may make in the packing room. To be sure that this happens, we

have consistently (and this goes back really to the first Mr. Procter

in 1837, who wrote on his invoices that these products were full

measure), established a history of overpacking. If that is an an- swer to your question, we believe in overpacking.

Why do we not try to make a bit more profit by reducing this

overpack? We know there are agencies that are going to be sure we do not get on the wrong side of the fence, and even if we were

always well intentioned, but started to play it too close, we would

get into trouble. In fact, we have been in trouble. We have, as the movie shows, some of our products below the marked weight.

We do not deny it. Sometimes it will be found in the trade below

the marked weight, because a sample that is found in a store comes

from only several seconds on one filling machine. During that period of time the product could average below the marked weight,

111
and this has been found on some inspections. The point we try to

make is to keep this to a reasonable minimum, and to do this we

must maintain an overpack on our product.

Mr. Cichowicz: I still am not convinced that overpacking is a good idea for such a large-volume company.

Me. Chaloud: The consumer pays for whatever any packer does,

and our main purpose is to be sure that she gets the right kind of

product. The real key is to do the best job you can. The key I

tried to point out is that we work hard to improve the steepness of

the distribution curve. That is the goal for anybody in the packing

industry. It is not to make an arbitrary overpack.

These figures are not big in terms of percentage. We are not

overpacking in terms of many ounces, but only fractions of ounces per box. It is our way to insure (and this we consider necessary

and the only legally defensible position) that we will always have

data to show we average at or above the marked weight. We do

not see how we could operate otherwise.

Mr. Ttjrrell: I certainly want to comment very favorably on your

presentation here today, but I am wondering just how long it has

been since you were as particular as you are now.

Mr. Chaloud: My presentation is intended to describe our two

aims—what we do in the packing room and what we do to be sure we know what we do in the packing room. What we do in the

packing room is covered by the X-bar range control data and the

difference between packed and marked weights. This has been going on, as far as I know, since before I joined the company in 1946.

We have always made studies to determine the average of our package weights and the range of data we will get from our packing

machines. We then make necessary adjustments to be sure that we

average at or above the marked weight.

In more recent years we decided, as a result of the growth of

interest in the weights and measures field, that our level of rea- sonable overpack probably was not enough. We had an inspection

by the State of West Virginia and decided, as a result of data they

supplied to us, that we were not as generous in the difference between the marked and packed weights as we could be. We felt we

would gain by making a more general program of deliberate over- packing.

The second part of your question concerns our program of knowing what we do in the packing room through weights standardization and scale checking. This actually has just recently occurred

and is still going on, by the way. Some of these weights are not

yet in the plant's hands. We learned with the help of the National Bureau of Standards that we were quite derelict in our knowledge of precisely what our weights really were in the plants,

since we did not have standard weights. We were not in possession of the Class S-l certified NBS weights. This is now going on. We operated with weights that we had purchased and thought were

accurate, but they were not certified.

Mr. Howard : My investigation discloses that the indicated weights

on the packages of soap are very much in order; however, I am

concerned with the representation of the quantity where premiums

are included in the package, and that is the reason for my particu112
lar investigation. As the result of a TV advertising, we made a soap survey to determine whether a package containing a premium

was so tilled as to mislead the purchaser as to the quantity of contents. I am not speaking of any particular product. This item is a package marked "2 pounds I0y2 ounces. The price is $1.09, which

is 39 cents a pound. With the packaged premium, the package was

36 percent empty. The premium took up 30 percent of the capacity

of the carton, and this 30 percent would have permitted 20 ounces,

or 47 percent, more product in the package. On the container of

the premium was the legend: "Please accept, with the compliments

of (name brand), the following (which is the premium inside each

package) and know it is yours at no extra cost."

Surveys show that the price per pound of the subject product

with the premium is over 75 percent higher price-per-pound than

before the premium was included. I am wondering if it would not

suit the purchaser to have the premium on the outside of the package, perhaps, with the package itself having the normal fill of

product.

Mr. Chaloud: Our company was the last in the soap industry to

go to premium packages. They are costly and a burden to manufacturing. The quality control of the premium itself becomes one

of the most taxing jobs in the plant. But we find that consumers

want it, because we were losing business to the people who were

selling premiums.

In answer to your question, first it is obvious that, if we are going

to put the premium inside the box, some space must be available for

it; so in the design of the package for premium packaged products,

space was set aside for it. We have only one product in the entire

P and G line that has a regular premium, and for that we made

oversized packages. They cannot be packed on any of our highspeed equipment. We have to operate at slow speeds. It is a more

costly product because of the labor that goes into it. Our Premium Duz product has gone to great pains to be certain

that the copy on the box and the TV commercials do not convey

the impression that the chinaware is free. To my knowledge, this

position is not abused, for we feel that it would be wrong to convey

the thought that the chinaware was a gift when, in fact, we and

the consumers both know they are paying for it. There are times when our regular products such as Tide or Cheer

will contain a premium such as plastic juice cups. When this is

done, these premiums are free, and it is so stated. The weight control procedures discussed in my talk are applied to the packages

before the insertion of premiums of this type, and it is necessary

for the product to meet the packing target weight just as if the

premium were not there. In addition, the premiums must be so

sized that they will not greatly affect the outage of the package

after the removal of the premium, because we know the housewife

uses the product on a volume basis, and if the product were to be

made more dense she would over-use the product but not get as many uses from the package, and this we know will lead to complaints from the consumer. Mr. G. L. Johnson: You use the words "giant," "family size,"

and other qualifiers. Then you put the net contents statement on

113
the package in a size so small the consumer must use a magnifying

glass to find it. Mr. Chalottd: I made a point of looking in the morning paper

here in Washington where there were soap products being advertised with the distinctions for sizes being by these same words you

are talking about. We have giant, and we have king size, but these are words that now have meaning to people other than you and me. To the consumer, these words convey a meaning of size relationship

so that she knows a "giant size" will last her family for a certain

length of time regardless of which product she buys. We believe,

however, that her results may vary as a result of brand selection.

We believe sincerely that a housewife who wishes to should have

the right to know what the net weight in a box is. We think we

have done this for her in all our soap products which have the

weight marking on the top of the package or on the top back side.

Both of these positions put it as close as practical to the price patch.

You know on soap packages all the pricing is done on a white spoton the top of the package. Eight now we are looking at and having

our art department reconsider the design of every one of our boxes,

so the price patch and the marked weight will be immediately

adjacent.

If you do not mind my going one step beyond your question, I

would like to speak openly to the group on a subject which several

people have asked me about during the meeting. Some people have

heard that soap products change their weight frequently, and there

will be different weights of products in the same size of package

on the shelf. Nothing could be further from the truth. Tide has

been in business for 15 years. We have only changed the weight

in the product once. That was 3 years ago, when we advanced the

weight slightly.

Another product, Cheer, has never had its weight changed.

Crisco started in 1911 packed in 1-pound and 3-pound units. In

50 years of selling, it is still in 1-pound and 3-pound cans. We

have never changed the weight.

The most serious thing we can do in our company is to consider a weight change of a product. It cannot be done by anyone other

than the Executive Committee of the company.

Mr. Howard : My survey in 1952 showed that you could buy soap

cheaper by the pound by buying the quantity in smaller packages than in giant packages.

Mr. Chaloud: We have a general policy. We consider a 20-ounce

box as the regular or basic size package. Each increasing size box

must have a slight reduction in cost or a slight increase in value

when we sell it to the retailer. We do not deny that these differentials are very small. Going from the regular to the giant is about

2 to 4 percent better value to the retailer.

We do not produce the bigger boxes because we want to. Take

the home laundry size which you saw in the film packed by manual

procedures; that is the most expensive Tide we have. That costs us more per pound than other sizes of Tide, yet we have to sell it

for a little bit less on a per-pound basis than any other size. We

have letters right now asking for Tide in 100-pound boxes. We

hope we have to do no further; otherwise we will get into operations

114
iii which we are not skilled. We are skilled in packaging things

fast on high-speed equipment. We do not like hand operations,

and they cost us money. That is part of the reason that you will never find these bargains to be big.

Mr. Faht: First, I would like to compliment you and your

company for what you people are trying to do to see that the cus- tomers are receiving in product what they are paying for. My

question is this: Does your company have humidity controls in their

hopper sections and filling rooms?

Mr. Chaloud: Not as a general practice. There are a few products where unusual humidity or temperature conditions would be

detrimental. They are very new and very recent, and we find that

normal air conditioning is the right answer. The real key to this is to try to determine what will be the loss or gain in weight after

packaging as a function of humidity, and this, of course, becomes

very important to us. Some of the packages, you may know, are very moisture proof and have moisture proof barriers built into the

box. Because we know there is usually a tendency for detergent

products to gain weight in terms of moisture pickup, we are not

worried about the marked weight violation. We are worried that

the consumer might not get the product out of the box. If it gets

too moist, it cakes. That is a real problem in the material we send

overseas. The product that goes into the Latin American countries

must have moistureproof barriers on the package. The very few

hours that a product sits in a packing room will cause no gain or

loss in weight.

Mr. J. H. Lewis : In order to evaluate the reasonableness of our

requiring net weight, it is quite evident from your report that your

company spends a great deal of money on this quality control program. Have you determined what this control program costs the

housewife in cost per unitMr. Chaloud : No, quality control is a manufacturing expense.

In other words, we do not charge it anywhere other than right in

the cost of manufacture. Just a sheer "guesstimate" is that it is

probably in the neighborhood of 0.1 cent per unit at the maximum.

The reason for that is that we do not have a great deal of destructive

sampling. If we went into destructive sampling, that would begin

to run our costs up. We do pack out a lot of products in the course

of a day, so the quality control procedures distributed across a large

number of units is reasonably small.

Mr. W. I. Thompson : You mentioned that there are some 935,000

samples taken each month, and I believe you mentioned that you

gave away some 3 million pounds of your product. I wonder if you

care to reveal what percentage 935,000 would be of the total number

of packages that you produce in a month and what the percentage of

weight would be on the weight production.

Mr. Chaloud: I cannot do that very precisely. I think the an- swer has to be that we are never in a position to say we do a complete statistical sample. This is not the key. The key, as I tried to

convey it, is the feedback of information to the packing machine.

We are not sampling ammunition, or anything like that, where you

would have to know the precise character of every unit.

115
Mr. J. P. Leonard : In your opening remarks you brought out the

point that the cardboard has a variation and the consistency of the

glue has a variation. What is the total weight variation you did

find in these boxes?

Mr. Chalotjd: A variation of 14 percent is encountered in the

total weight of cartons, that is between the extremes. Carton board

made by high-speed, continuous operation in a paper mill does not

vary greatly between successive cartons, but may vary more from

hour to hour. For this reason we keep feeding back new tares to

the packing line scale, to be sure that our weight of powder put into

the box is as close to the packing target as we know how to make it. Mr. Leonard: Does a carton absorb moisture from the product?

Mr. Chaloud: Not very often. You have to go into a bit of

chemistry. One of the major ingredients in all detergent products

is a phosphate. This phosphate has a very great affinity for water

and wants to hydrate. It will hydrate water away from the cardboard if any is available. If the board comes with the actual vapor

pressure above 35 percent relative humidity, the detergent will tend

to take any excess moisture away from the board. In most cases, however, this is not a problem.

FOURTH SESSION—AFTERNOON OF THURSDAY,

JUNE 15, 1961

(A. D. Rose, Vice Chairman, Presiding)

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON RESOLUTIONS

Presented by Raymond Rebuffo, Chairman, Assistant Director, Division of Plant Industry, Department of Agriculture, State of

Nevada

Resolutions of appreciation were adopted as follows:

1. To Honorable Luther H. Hodges for his constructive contribution to the

program of the 46th National Conference on Weights and Measures.

2. To the Institute of Weights and Measures Administration and to Mr.

J. R. Roberts for his excellent address on the Training of the Weights and

Measures Official in Great Britain.

3. To governing agencies for their cooperation in facilitating attendance at the Conference.

4. To business and industry for cooperating with the Conference, for attending and participating in its activities, and for hospitality extended.

5. To program speakers.

6. To the Director and staff of the National Bureau of Standards for assist- ance in planning and administering the program and other details of the

meeting.

RESOLUTION FOR REPUBLICATION OF HANDBOOK 26

Whereas, there has been prepared by Ralph W. Smith of the Office

of Weights and Measures, National Bureau of Standards, the manuscript of a revision to NBS Handbook 26, "Weights and Measures

Administration" ; and

Whereas, the original version of Handbook 26 has become a standard text in this field; and

Whereas, the Chairman of the 46th National Conference on

Weights and Measures has carefully read and studied the manuscript

116
e and lias formally recommended both its contents and its publication

e Therefore, be it

i Resolved^ That this 46th National Conference on Weights and

Measures urge the publication of the Handbook by the National

t Bureau of Standards and authorize the printing on the title page

d of the legend "Recommended b}^ the National Conference on Weights

>t and Measures" : and be it further

Resolved, That the principles set forth in the revision to Hando book 26 are recommended by the Conference to all weights and measo ures officials and legislative bodies of States, counties, and cities,

t. RESOLUTION FOR TRADING IN GRAINS BY WEIGHT

Whereas, the National Conference on Weights and Measures has

s for many years urged the official adoption of the hundredweight unit

t as the basis for trading in grains; and

Whereas, studies have demonstrated that a weight-derived volu-

>r metric bushel unit in the grain trade cannot be justified technologid cally or economically and that there are no major legal institutional or psychological barriers to the transition to a strictly weight basis

that cannot be overcome in an orderly manner; and

Whereas, the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture, having had this matter referred to it by the National Conference on Weights and Measures, has pursued the proposal vigorously through an action committee under the chairmanship of D. N.

McDowell, Director of Agriculture, State of Wisconsin: Therefore,

be it

Resolved, That the National Conference on Weights and Measures

respectfully request at this time that the National Association of

'; State Departments of Agriculture propose to the U.S. Department of

'/ Agriculture that it establish a target date not later than July 1, 1962,

for the conversion of their feed-grain, price-support-loan, and storage

programs from the bushel basis to the hundredweight basis : and be

it further

Resolved, That this Conference urge that each weights and measi sures official pursue in his State action and education programs with

,

r

j interested and affected groups.

at CONSUMER PROTECTION

Whereas, consumer protection and consumer education are constantly increasing in importance to the Nation's economic well being

;

and

Whereas, equitable comparisons and intelligent decisions by the

k consumer in the market place are growing more and more difficult;

and

Whereas, the President of the United States has recognized the

*e importance of consumer interests in the public announcement of his

i- intention to appoint a consumer counsel in the office of the President

s i Therefore, be it

Resolved, That this the 46th National Conference on Weights and

1- Measures, assembled in Washington, D.C., on the 15th of June, 1961,

does officially commend the President on this decision and offer the

in full cooperation of this organization to the person appointed to that

it important post : and be it further

117
Resolved, That a copy of this resolution be sent to the President

and that additional copies be furnished the Nation's press.

LABELING AND ADVERTISING

Whereas, the labeling and advertising of quantities of commodities offered for sale is becoming less straightforward, more confusing, and increasingly deceptive ; and

Whereas, plain and honest representation of quantity, whether it

be in advertising, labeling, or in other form of communication, is of

vital concern to all consumers and to weights and measures officials

throughout the Nation : Therefore, be it Resolved, That the 46th National Conference on Weights and

Measures does hereby respectfully urge that all manufacturers, packers, advertising agencies, and others with interest carefully survey

and study this area of their own operations, with the aim of seeing

that all laws, regulations, and moral obligations are fully complied

with : and be it further

Resolved, That this resolution be included in the minutes of this

meeting and that it also be given the widest practicable distribution

among those interested.

Raymond Rebuffo, Chairman

G. W. Bay

J. T. Daniell

W. C. Hughes

W. H. Jennings

J. F. Madden

N. P. Tilleman

(On motion of the Conference Chairman, seconded from the floor,

the report of the Committee on Resolutions was adopted by voice vote.)

REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Presented by R. E. Meek, Chairman., Director, Division of Weights

and Measures, Board of Health, State of Indiana

The committee, fully aware that its actions can be only reflections

of Conference consensus, appreciates the excellent reports, both written and oral, to its several inquiries and appreciates also the many

constructive comments made during its open hearing on Tuesday.

The Executive Committee presents now, for consideration by the

Conference, the following items

Organization and Procedure of the National Conference

1. The following proposed amendments were presented formally

to the 45th National Conference, in accordance with the procedure

covering amendments. The Executive Committee now recommends

final adoption of these amendments by this Conference.

(a) Section 3. Constituent Membership.—Amend the final paragraph of Section 3, Constituent Membership, which now reads,

"Members of all classes have the privilege of the floor at meetings of

the Conference" to read

Members of all classes have the privilege of the floor at all meetings of the

Conference except executive sessions. Attendance at an executive session is

118
limited to the active and advisory membership, members of both classes having the privilege of the floor.

(b) Section 6. Duties of Officers.—Amend the second paragraph

of Section 6, Duties of Officers, by adding at the end of the present

paragraph a sentence reading:

The Conference Chairman is authorized to order an executive session of the

Conference at any time such a session is deemed by him to be in the best

interests of the Conference.

DISCUSSION OF ITEM 1 Mr. Allen : I do not understand the purpose of this amendment.

From the viewpoint of an associate member, it looks like it may be

some means to get us out of the room so there can be a discussion

that we know nothing about. I am curious to know what is the

purpose of what is anticipated in an executive session. I felt we

were welcome here to at least get our voice in the affairs of the Conference, as I am getting mine in now. We recognize that we have

no vote. What are the circumstances under which, in the future,

we will not even have a voice?

Mr. Meek : Mr. Allen, there will be no circumstances under which

you "will not even have a voice." It is not at the present contemplated and we do not presently know of a need for holding executive

sessions. You are aware of the fact that practically all organizations

do provide for executive sessions. We want to make that provision now. That was brought up and discussed last year. It is not con- templated that we will ever call an executive session to preclude

discussion by the full membership of the National Conference, including associate members.

There can be occasions, however, when the active weights and

measures officials will want to get together to discuss a problem

peculiar to their own responsibilities as public officials. We feel that

under Robert's Rules of Order we now have that authority. But,

before the situation might arise, Ave think it would be well to provide

in our organizational procedure the necessary language to prevent

any possible misunderstanding, should the occasion arise.

Mr. Allen : I appreciate what may be the intent of the present

committee and the present officers, and so forth, but, in effect, you

are writing rules for posterity, for the future of the organization.

What your intent may be today may not be the intent of future committees or future executives.

Somebody in the future may say, "There it is in the bylaws; we

have the privilege of doing this." As I get it, there is nothing in

your present wording that says that, for example, this session this

afternoon, where you are going to vote on changes in Handbook 44,

which are very vital to your associate members, could be an executive

session. As I understand the wording here, there is nothing that

says that some future committee, with perhaps not the same ideals

and motives that you have, could not say, "We know these fellows

don't want it, we are tired of hearing them talk, let's have an executive session and we will pass this and everything will be O, K."

Would it not be wise to have some provision that says at least

certain types of business that are of vital concern to your associate

119
members, which perhaps is the main reason why the associate members attend your Conference, cannot be taken up in executive session ? Mr. Meek : As you know, Mr. Allen, this has been brought up

before and laid over for adoption this year. I would like to make

this remark. There is no organiaztion stronger than the confidence

that the members have in it. I think that, because of the reputation

and history of the National Conference on Weights and Measures

established over the last 56 years, you can rest assured there will be

no action taken that will preclude full debate on the part of all

concerned.

You talk about circumscribing and setting out certain limits. We

cannot foresee all the limitations that you have in mind and that

might develop later. This is simple language. It is in order. It is recognized by other organizations. We are not going beyond the

bounds of propriety. We overlooked the matter at the time we

drafted this organizational procedure. If I had thought of it, I

would have certainly suggested that we should provide for executive

sessions.

( Item 1 was adopted by voice vote.

)

2. The Director of the National Bureau of Standards, ex officio

President of the National Conference, has suggested to the Executive

Committee that it give serious consideration to the matter of its ex officio Secretary- The Organization and Procedure of the Conference now provides that the Chief, Office of Weights and Measures,

of the Bureau is ex officio the Conference Secretary. As is known

to the delegates, the Bureau is preparing for a move of its entire

staff and program to the planned new Bureau facilities near

Gaithersburg, Maryland. Involved in this move are many major

and minor Bureau organizational changes. The Director thus feels

that it would be most appropriate for the Conference to change its

Organization and Procedure to provide simply that a senior and

qualified weights and measures authority on the Bureau staff be

designated by the Director to serve as the Conference Executive

Secretary.

Since this matter is of immediate importance, the Executive Committee has directed its Chairman to seek the unanimous consent of

the Conference to depart from the 1-year layover for such amendments that is provided in Section 10 of the Conference Organization

and Procedure. Accordingly, I now formally request unanimous

consent of the members of this Conference to consider at this time

an amendment in this relation. (Those who favor such consent will

respond by saying "Aye." If anyone is opposed, let him announce

his "No.")

Unanimous consent having been granted, I now present for Conference action the language of this proposed amendment to Section

4. Officers.

The Director of the National Bureau of Standards is, ex officio, the President.

The Director of the National Bureau of Standards shall designate a senior

member of the Bureau staff, who is thoroughly conversant with weights and

measures administration nationally, to serve the Conference as its Executive

Secretary.

120
Authority is granted to remove from the Organization and Procedure any inconsistencies that arise from this action.

( Item 2 was adopted by voice vote.

)

3. There are a number of other provisions covered in the Conference Organization and Procedure that appear to the Executive Committee to require consideration. These are proposed to this 46th

Conference in accordance with Section 10 for action by the 47th

Conference in 1962.

(a) Section 3. Constituent Membership.—In order that due rec- ognition may be afforded those weights and measures authorities who

have served the Conference in high elected positions or for many years

and who later have retired from their positions in Federal, State,

comity, or city government, it is recommended that the advisory membership be extended by amending the third paragraph of Section 3,

Constituent Membership, to read as follows

Advisory membership comprises (1) representatives of agencies of the Federal Government who are concerned in any way with regulatory weights and

measures officers or their official activities or who are interested in the objectives

and activities of the Conference, and (2) each person who has retired from

his Federal, State, county, or city weights and measures position and who, in

addition, prior to his retirement, either has served the Conference as its President, Chairman, or Executive Secretary, or has attended as an active or advisory member 15 or more meetings of the Conference.

(b) In order that the duties and field of operation of the Executive

Committee be more specifically set forth, and to avoid any questions

as to its authority to act in certain areas, it is recommended that the

fourth paragraph under Section 7, Duties and Fields of Operation of

Committees, be amended as follows:

Executive Committee.—Subject to the overriding authority of the Conference

itself, the committee selects the place, dates, and headquarters, and fixes the

registration fee, for each meeting of the Conference, may at its option fill any

vacancy in an elective office of the Conference caused by death, resignation, or retirement from active official regulatory service, advises with the Executive Secretary with respect to the programs for the meetings of the Conference, reviews the general activities of the Conference and its committees and

makes such recommendations to the Conference, the Conference officers, and

the committee chairmen as it deems appropriate, and, in the interval between

successive meetings of the Conference, authorizes interim meetings of Conference committees as the need therefor may develop, authorizes committee and

other contingent expenditures (including travel and subsistence expenses of

committee members and the Conference Chairman), and acts for the Conference in all routine or emergency situations that may arise. Each new Executive Committee joins with the new chairmen of standing Conference committees in a breakfast meeting (as guests of the Conference) on the last day of

the Conference, for general discussion and for transaction of business by the

Executive Committee. Questions before the Executive Committee are decided, whether by voice vote or ballot, on the basis of the majority of votes

cast.

(c) As has been explained in the Report of the Conference Committee on Laws and Regulations, it now considers its duties and re- sponsibilities inadequately defined in the Organization and Procedure.

To clarify this situation, the Executive Committee recommends that

the sixth paragraph of Section 7, Duties and Fields of Operation of

Committees, be amended to read as follows

Committee on Laws and Regulations.—The committee annually presents a

report for Conference action. Its field of operation embraces all matters

121
within the area of weights and measures supervision that deal with the de- velopment and interpretation of model laws and model regulations, the study

and analysis of bills introduced for legislative enactment, and the recommendations of general and administrative procedures, but exclusive of such matters as are within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Specifications and

Tolerances.

(Item 3 was adopted by voice vote.)

Meeting Place for the National Conference

As recommended by the Executive Committee of the National Conference on Weights and Measures during its session held on the

morning of June 10, 1960, the Conference Chairman appointed a

special committee to explore the advisability of scheduling meetings

of the Conference in localities other than Washington, D.C.

In considering the membership of such a special committee, it appeared that the entire membership of the National Conference would

be best represented by the five principal officers elected from the

active membership, namely, the Chairman and the four Vice Chairmen. These officers are not only elected by the Conference, but are well located geographically to represent the entire membership. The

Chairman of the National Conference (and of the Executive Committee) assumed the chairmanship of this special committee. The

Chairman and four Vice Chairmen are as follows

B. E. Meek, Indianapolis, Indiana

J. W. D. Harvey, Atlanta, Georgia

H. D. Robinson, Augusta, Maine

A. D. Eose, Bakersfield, California

J. D. Walton, Dallas, Texas

The last previous study of the question at issue was made in 1956

and 1957 by the Study Committee on Conference Organization and

Procedure, and resulted in the following committee conclusion, which

was included in the committee's report to the 42d National Conference :

It is the feeling of the Committee that the place for the meetings of the

Conference should be fixed by the Conference. However, the Committee wishes

to report its thought that, for the present, these meetings should be held in Washington, D.C. It may be noted in relation to the meeting place that the

Committee thinking is in agreement with opinions expressed by the large majority of those who commented on this point in letters to the Committee.

The National Conference, by its adoption of the committee report,

approved the quoted conclusion. Notwithstanding this comparatively recent action, the current committee decided that it would be

helpful to develop a new consensus of those weights and measures

officials who normally attend National Conferences. Accordingly, a

questionnaire was sent to the head of each State weights and measures division and to the head of each city and county department

that has been represented at the Conference in the last several years.

Eecipients of the questionnaire were asked to vote "yes" or "no"

on the following question

Is it your opinion that the National Conference on Weights and Measures

sbould be held annually in Washington, D.C?

Those voting "no" were asked to give their suggestions "as to

means of covering the many large and small arrangements and the

122
costs of the trieetings thai are now borne by the National Bureau

of Si andards."

A total of 122 persons replied to the first question. Of this number, 102 voted "yes," 17 voted "no," and 3 expressed themselves in

favor of occasionally holding tbe meetings elsewhere than in Washington, in the event suitable arrangements could be made. The 20

members who did not vote "yes" are to be commended for the suggestions submitted with regard to arranging and financing meetings

if held elsewhere than in Washington.

In view of the preponderance of the "yes" vote and the total lack

of any unanimity of thinking relative to arrangements and financing

in the event of National Conferences being held elsewhere, the committee unanimously recommended that the Executive Committee

continue to schedule all National Conferences in Washington until

such time as the question is again studied and the wishes of the

active members of the Conference are again determined by an appropriate committee.

The subcommittee was of the opinion that this matter, including

its recommendation, is one that is appropriate for the Conference

to review from time to time—particularly in the event circumstances

arise that cannot be foreseen at the present.

In view of the comprehensive study and the obvious soundness of

the conclusions of the subcommittee, the Executive Committee con- curred in the report of its subcommittee and now recommends to

the Conference that its annual meeting continue to be held in

Washington, D.C., until such conclusive evidence is submitted that

would lead to further consideration.

( This item was adopted by voice vote.

)

NBS Handbook 26, Weights and Measures Administration

In order that the National Conference on Weights and Measures

might be permitted to go on record formally with respect to the

publication of and the principles set forth in the proposed revision

of NBS Handbook 26, Weights and Measures Administration, the

Conference Chairman accepted the responsibility of reading and

studying the manuscript. As the result of this study and the

Chairman's report to the Executive Committee, the following reso- lution is recommended by that committee for adoption by the

Conference

Whereas, there has been prepared by Ralph W. Smith of the Office of

Weights and Measures, National Bureau of Standards, the manuscript of a

revision to NBS Handbook 26, "Weights and Measures Administration" ; and

Whereas, the original version of Handbook 26 has become a standard text

in this field; and

Whereas, the Chairman of the 46th National Conference on Weights and

Measures has carefully read and studied the manuscript and has formally

recommended both its contents and its publication : Therefore, be it

Resolved, That this 46th National Conference on Weights and Measures urge

the publication of the Handbook by the National Bureau of Standards and

authorize the printing on the title page of the legend "Recommended by the

National Conference on Weights and Measures" : and be it further

Resolved, That the principles set forth in the revision to Handbook 26 are recommended by the Conference to all weights and measures officials and legislative bodies of States, counties, and cities.

(This item was adopted by voice vote.)

613254—61——9 123
Conclusion

The Executive Committee has been acutely aware of its responsibility to act for the Conference in the interim between regular

meetings and is grateful for the opportunity thus afforded to serve. The National Conference on Weights and Measures is strengthened,

and its influence is extended through the active interest, support,

and participation of every weights and measures official and all

representatives of affected industry and business. The committee

commends to the thoughtful attention of all officials both the deliberations and the formal actions of the Conference and the implementation of Conference conclusions and recommendations through

official action in their several jurisdictions.

R. E. Meek. Chairman H. H. Houston

J. W. D. Harvey Nathan Kalechman

H. D. Robinson H. R. Kennell

A. D. Rose J. H. Lewis

J. D. Walton J. F. McCarthy

C. C. Morgan William Miller

R. W. Searles John Seres

W. S. Bussey, Secretary Delbert Walrath

E. W. Bucklin

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor, the report

of the Executive Committee was adopted by voice vote.)

REPORT OF THE SECRETARY OF THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE

W. S. Bussey, National Bureau of Standards

During the early years of the National Conference on Weights

and Measures, it was the established custom for the Conference Secretary to make a report to the delegates annually. This custom

ended with the 13th Conference in 1920, except for intermittent

reports thereafter. It is believed that a renewal of the regular

series of reports, covering items that are within the particular cognizance of the Secretary and that should be of general interest to

the delegates, will be desirable to the end that the membership of

the Conference may be kept informed.

Accordingly, this report is presented. It will be divided into two

principal parts. The first will be a discussion of certain matters

arising from the weights and measures operations of the States,

counties, and cities. The second part will be a brief summary of

the weights and measures activities of the National Bureau of

Standards.

Activities of the States, Counties, and Cities

During the past year, weights and measures supervision seems

to have made steady and continuing progress. Generally, there is being directed greater and more effective attention to the supervisory aspects of the work, especially in connection with the control of packaged commodities. This control, in a large majority of

instances, has been based on the procedures set forth in NBS Handbook 67.

124
Interstate, and in certain instances intrastate, communication

among weights and measures officials remains a serious problem.

Some attempts are being made toward a solution. A group of offi- cials in certain southern jurisdictions haA'e been experimenting with

a weekly reporting system designed to keep each other advised as

to commodities in package form that have been found improperly

labeled or containing less than the quantity represented. In other

parts of the country certain neighboring jurisdictions also have

been informing each other, but on a less frequent and less formal

basis. It has been suggested that it behooves the Conference to

seek a scheme of convenient exchange of information, countrywide, on noncompliance of interstate packages and on other faulty conditions in connection with which interstate cooperation may better

bring about corrective measures. Only thus can the effect of individual enforcement effort accumulate to a national program. It is my hope that the Committee on Education and the Executive Committee will give this possibility their careful and continued attention.

Another phase of package control that demands attention is the

variations in weight of a group of presumably uniform containers.

Since the only reasonable control system for packages, it seems, is

the gravimetric system, whether the product is being sold by weight

or by liquid measure, the range of weights of the tares of a given

lot of packages is highly significant. This is an area of activity

that is being considered presently by the National Bureau of

Standards.

The basis for the weights and measures program is, of course,

the statute. During the past year several States have amended their

laws, and the States of Tennessee and Alaska have enacted entirely

new weights and measures laws, faithfully following, in all important respects, the Model Law adopted by this Conference.

Efforts of most States toward uniformity of specifications and

tolerances have been outstanding. The provisions of the Conference codes, as published in NBS Handbook 44, now have been

promulgated officially by 39 of the States plus the District of

Columbia and the Commonwealth of Puerto Eico. Most of the

remaining States advise that their enforcement activities are being

guided by the codes, but, for one reason or another, they have not

seen fit to take official action.

The situation in package regulation also is commendable, but the

degree of uniformity is somewhat less. The language of the Model

Regulation has been adopted recently in Tennessee, Washington,

and perhaps elsewhere. Several other States have had the Model

Regulation in effect for several years. The principles spelled out

in the Model Regulation are in effect in many States in the form

of food and drug regulations. These same principles have interstate

status with respect to packages of foods, drugs, and cosmetics

through the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Significant purchases of testing equipment by States, counties,

and cities have been too numerous to permit listing here. There

is increasing evidence of uniformity in this area also. The 30-pound

"cube" weight kit, the small kit of cylindrical decimal weights, the

small equal-arm scale for package checking, the Stabilene tape for

testing fabric-measuring devices, the glass flasks for milk-bottle

125
control, the graduated glass flasks for checking packages of liquids,

the gage-glass 5 -gallon test measure, and certain other items well

known to those present have become quite standard among the many

jurisdictions. This surely is a move in the right direction.

Testing procedures too are becoming more nearly standard. The

States that conduct formal technical training schools have been

guided in this connection by the NBS handbooks and the Test

Procedure Outlines.

Although, as can be seen, there has been definite progress, there

is room for much more. Many laws, both State and local, are obsolete and should be revised; many jurisdictions have provided insufficient manpower to do an effective job; the adequacy of testing

equipment available for field inspectors is far from ideal; and the

training of new and experienced officials has not, as a rule, kept up

with the advances in the technology of weighing and measuring.

Weights and Measures Activities of the National Bureau of Standards

Immediately following the close of the 45th National Conference,

I was privileged to travel to England, Scotland, Northern Ireland,

and nine European countries. The principal purpose of the trip

was to attend and address the 1960 Annual General Meeting of the

British Institute of Weights and Measures Administration on the

subject of the Development of Weights and Measures Control of

Packaged Goods in the United States. The chief weights and

measures official in each of the countries visited was contacted.

Numerous local officials also were visited in several of the countries.

Studies were made of the office and laboratory facilities and procedures. Many field trips were made for the purpose of observing

actual enforcement techniques. This trip afforded an excellent opportunity to compare our activities and facilities with those of these

other countries.

Technical training has been a principal project of the Office of

Weights and Measures. Since the last National Conference, staff

members have conducted or have been major contributors in formal

schools in the States of Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri,

New Hampshire, Obio, and Tennessee. In other States, field training involving special equipment or directed to the solution of special technical problems has been undertaken.

The genesis of a training effort of a very special character has

been reported on by the Chairman of the Conference Committee on

Education. This, of course, was the first technical training course

for instructors in weights and measures supervision. It is sufficient

here to comment that, from the standpoint of the National Bureau

of Standards, this school was quite successful. The 13 students

were able, apt, and enthusiastic. Additional courses of this type

will be offered if and when there appears to be sufficient demand

for them.

Another project of the Office of Weights and Measures that has

received major attention during the past 12 months is the development of new State Standards. This has required research on

materials, experiments on designs, composition of purchase and

performance specifications, and comprehensive testing.

Undoubtedly the most startling, and at the same time the most

satisfying, result has been design and fabrication of high precision

126
balances of the one-pan, semiautomatic type for weighing loads up

to 50 pounds.

Progress on the new State standards has been satisfactory, and

the establishment of a time schedule now is feasible. Depending

entirely upon the acceptability of the program to the Administration and the willingness of the Congress to appropriate necessary

funds, it now appears that it will be practicable to have the first

complete sets of standards and instruments tested and ready for

delivery by mid-1963.

These standards and instruments will be such that, if adequate

space and properly trained personnel are provided, the State weights

and measures laboratory can become, in reality, the measurement

center for the State—for business, industry, education, and technology.

The staff of the Office of Weights and Measures has continued

its policy of participating in each State and regional weights and

measures meeting. Correspondence and other requests for consultation have occupied considerable staff time, and the aim has been

to give prompt attention to each request.

The new stainless-steel prover for liquid meters dispensing liquid

fertilizers has been designed, fabricated, and delivered, and now is awaiting test. The power-operated dolly for moving 500- and

1000-pound test weights has been completed, and drawings for production are available on request. A special weight study for the

tobacco industry has been planned and will be pursued shortly.

The Weights and Measm-es Library is progressing nicely. Organization of the shelves and accessions of valuable documents have

been most satisfactory. The detailed subject and author index of

all archival volumes except periodicals is complete, and the index of

the periodicals is now under way and should be completed by the

end of this calendar year.

Another indexing operation of significant proportions that re- cently has been completed is that involving the Reports of the National Conference. The last previous index covered Reports through

the 36th Conference (1951). The one now in press will include all

Reports through the 45th Conference.

In the future, as in the past, the policy of the National Bureau

of Standards will be to make its services available on a "request"

basis, and it will be the aim of the staff to fulfill requests falling

within its authorized area of activity to the full extent of the personnel, facilities, and funds available.

Looking to future facilities, there is anticipated serious crowding

for the next few years and then an ideal situation. In the planning

for the new Bureau facilities at Gaithersburg, all possibilities in the

foreseeable future have been considered. The weights and measures

activity will occupy excellent quarters on the seventh floor of the

Administration Building, with an efficient office layout, a combination

library and conference room, an engineering area, a modern training laboratory, and a model State laboratory.

Speaking generally, the weights and measures officials of the

United States and affected industry and business can look forward

to increasing technical assistance from the National Bureau of

Standards,

127
WEIGHTS AND MEASURES IN CENTRAL AMERICA

By A. E. Diaz, Head, Weights and Measures Division, Economic

Stabilization Administration, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

This paper, for which I could use the title "A long way from

standards,"' is a short story about the weights and measures situation in a group of countries that are working hard to rebuild their

economy by means of an integration program. In planning that

program, the importance of the standardization of weights and

measures was recognized.

For our purpose, Central America is the geographical name applied to the strip of land connecting North America and South

America, but excluding British Honduras and Panama. Thus modified, Central America consists of an area of 190,761 square miles

and had a population of over nine million, estimated as of 1955.

This population is racially diverse, and the proportion of each racial element varies from country to coimtry. For the whole area the

Indian and mestizo (mixed Indian and European) elements are each far superior in members to any of the other groups.

Agriculture dominates the life of the greater part of the population in Central America. On the commercial scale, coffee and

bananas outweigh all other crops. As far as foreign trade is concerned, the role of the United States is the dominant one. Up to the first half of the 19th century the Spanish system of

weights and measures was predominant in the five Central American

countries. From the beginning, these countries have lacked uniformity in the units of weights and measures, especially the units of

length. Apparently, the absence of reference standards is responsible for the introduction and use of units whose values differ among

the countries and sometimes even within a country. For example,

the Spanish unit "cuerda" used for land measurements has six different values in Guatemala depending upon the section of the country where the measurement is made. In addition to the Spanish

system, the population still uses native units which also lack uniformity.

The units of weights and measures used in England and in the

United States were also introduced into Central America.

As a result of the international conventions for the adoption of

the metric system, the Central American countries enacted laws for

the mandatory use of metric units of weights and measures. Costa

Rica was the first one to adopt this system in 1881 and Guatemala

the last one in 1910. In spite of those promulgations, which recognized the metric system as the only legal system of weights and

measures, the situation today is far from standardization. Metricunits account for only 12 percent of the total units in use, while

native units represent 50 percent, and Spanish and English 19 percent each. The metric system is almost exclusively used by the

Customs Service, mail, and railroads.

For commercial weighing the Spanish "libra" is used, and textiles

and land are sold by the "vara." The "vara" is equivalent to 36

Spanish inches; its values in Costa Rica and El Salvador are the

same, but this value differs from the accepted equivalent in the other

three republics.

128
A coffee grower in Central America pays for picking the harvest

by the Spanish "libra," his export duties on it are paid by the kilogram, and he sells it abroad by the avoirdupois pound. While in

Costa Rica a bushel of corn is equivalent to 768 Spanish "libras," in

El Salvador it is equal to 200 "libras'" and in Nicaragua to 310

"libras." Complicated, is it not?

What about inspection and testing for weighing and measuring

devices '. There is practically no control at all. Although a Central

American Convention, ratified by the five republics, provides for

the establishment of national services for weights and measures

administration, nothing has been done yet. There are some areas where weights and measures registration offices are established at

the municipal level. But these offices, which work on a fee system,

exist mainly as a source of income rather than in the interest of

accuracy. For instance, in Guatemala City a home-made smallcapacity scale that costs approximately 75 cents pays an annual

registration fee of $1.00. In the case of a gasoline dispenser, the

fee amounts to $36.00. How much importance is given to accuracy

is evidenced by the inadequacy of the testing equipment used and

the specifications applied, which are practically none. Worried about this situation that so seriously affects the international trade and the possibilities of the Economic Integration Programme, the Central Banks requested the Committee on Economic

Cooperation to take action on the matter of the standardization of

weights and measures. This request initiated the train of events

that eventually put the Technical Assistance Programme of the

United Nations to work.

From that point on, the standardization of weights and measures

in Central America has been considered of paramount importance

as part of the preparations for the Common Market, under theEconomic Integration Programme.

I was asked by United Nations to go to Central America in an

advisory capacity. In each republic a counterpart was appointed to

cooperate in the drafting of a weights and measures bill and regulations. With their assistance, a series of interviews were held with

leaders in commerce, industry, and government to explore their

reactions to the exclusive use of the metric system and the creation

of national bureaus for the enforcement of the weights and measures

law and regulations.

The idea of standardization based on the metric system was ac- cepted. With respect to the weights and measures bureaus, some

government officers appear to endorse a municipal program instead

of the proposed national bureaus. The reason for this seemed to

be that in these countries weights and measures administration has

existed at the municipal level only and also because that service constitutes a source of income to the municipal treasury. It was also

claimed that a national program would be too expensive and that

the present situation would not permit the development of such a program. These expressions did not represent the points of view of

the majority; however, the economic significance of the weights

and measures control program was underestimated by most of the

officers.

After consultation and discussion with my official counterparts, a proposed uniform bill of weights and measures was drafted. This

129
bill establishes the mandatory use of the metric system, appoints

the Central American Research Institute for Industry as custodian

of the internationally certified standards, and provides a weights

and measures control program at the national level.

Proposed uniform regulations dealing with units of weights and

measures and specifications and tolerances for weighing and meas- uring devices were also drafted.

Another proposal Avas prepared regarding the establishment of a regional office of weights and measures, that is, a Section at the

Central American Research Institute for Industry, located in Guatemala City, that would supply standards and technical assistance to

the national bureaus. This Institute is sponsored by the United

Nations and operated by a board of directors composed of the Ministers of Economy. As it is contemplated to establish the national

weights and measures bureaus in the ministries of economy, the

Weights and Measures Section at the Institute would play an important role in helping these bureaus to attain efficiency, and at the

same time it would be less costly than operating separate national

laboratories.

In regard to the establishment of the standards laboratory at the

Institute, arrangements were made with the U. S. National Bureau

of Standards for the formulation of specific recommendations. To

that end, the Bureau sent Dr. L. V. Judson to Guatemala City for a survey. Later, a comprehensive report was rendered.

Another phase of the proposals was the preparation of a working

plan for accomplishing the change to the metric system. It was

suggested that the execution of the plan be assigned to a special

committee composed of members representing consumers, industry,

commerce, and government. This committee would establish important policies such as a schedule of priorities for the changeover and

duration of the transition period.

These are, in general, the ways and means for the standardization

of weights and measures in Central America that were submitted

to the consideration of the Economic Commission for Latin America.

The final action depends now on the governments, through their

Committee of Economic Cooperation.

With respect to this final action I would like to point out the

following:

The execution of the program herein described contemplates the standardization based on the exclusive use of the metric system. As stated before, this

program was accepted as an urgent necessity, but opinions about the possibilities of success of such a program are divided. Among the pessimists there

arc some win. ailirni thai ilii- could no1 be done unless the United Slates and

England change their systems too. Another group argues that the Indian

population presents a serious problem of education if the proposed change is adopted. Expenditures for new weighing and measuring devices and reconditioning of the ones in use are factors also mentioned.

The consideration of these arguments reminds me of India. In

my opinion, the situation in India is even worse, and yet the changeover to the metric system is making continuous progress. And next

to the South Border of the United States there is Mexico, a country

with more or less the same conditions as Central America, but

Mexico succeeded and is now a metric country.

It seems to us that the changeover in Central America would be

less expensive than what is normally expected because there are no

130
requirements for specifications and tolerances.. This allows for the

use of a considerable amount of inexpensive weighing and measuring

devices, so their rejection or seizure would not result in a serious

economic loss.

The assignment for standardization on weights and measures came

to an end. At this point you might ask, "What is finally going to happen in Central America in regard to weights and measures

administration?" Central America will go metric, all the way. I

do not know exactly when, but it will happen. Progress in that

activity will be in direct relation with the developments for the

Common Market and the Integration Programme. The change to

the metric system will require the establishment of the national

bureaus. And those enforcement agencies will establish certain re- quirements applicable to weighing and measuring devices. United

States manufacturers would probably receive most of the orders to

satisfy the new needs for nine million inhabitants. Or it might be

that some manufacturers will decide to open plants somewhere in

the region to take advantage of the fax incentive programs for

new industries.

In the meantime the Central American Research Institute for

Industry is trying to get full control for the continuation of the

weights and measures standardization program. The Institute is in a position to contract the services of a weights and measures expert

on short notice and with flexibility as to the duration of the

assignment.

But the important thing is that all this activity will bring Central

America to a meeting point with us, in our goal—to see that equity

prevails.

In closing this paper, I wish to express my appreciation to the

Office of Weights and Measures of the National Bureau of Standards

for its splendid cooperation in the fulfillment of my assignment

with the United Nations.

DISCUSSION ON FOREGOING PAPER

Mr. Rose : Does anyone have any questions he would like to ask

Mr. Diaz?

Mr. Rheix : How great a problem is there going to be to reeducate

for the metric system? And secondly, how much resistance do you

expect from industry?

Mr. Diaz : As to the first question, any well coordinated program

of education that is established must stimulate the public and private schools so that they will teach and apply the metric system,

so that the younger segment of the population would be educated for

the changeover. The program for the older population will require

a lot more effort. In general, the education program is a tremendous job.

As to how much resistance, I would say that there would be as much resistance and to the same extent that human nature usually

resists change. But in this case the necessity for the changeover has

been accepted, and this will help to overcome the resistance.

Mr. Turnbull : Mr. Diaz, do you think that, if the United States

and Great Britain were to adopt the metric system officially, this

would aid the adoption of the metric system in Central America?

Mr. Diaz : Yes, I believe so.

131
Mr. J. G. Lewis : You indicated that there have been several sur- veys and reports made. Has there been any estimation of the cost

and the length of time for the transition to the metric system?

Mr. Diaz: Nothing has been estimated that I know of. It is

known that this is going to be a costly program.

Mr. Schieb : I thought I would like to make the report that every

baker who goes through the baking school is well aware of the

metric system and well schooled in it.

A NEW APPROACH TO WEIGHTS AND MEASURES CONTROL

By G. P. Larrick, Commissioner of Food and Drugs,

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare

It is a pleasure to be with you again and to have the opportunity

of considering matters of mutual interest with you.

Mr. Bussey has told me of your interest in what is being done,

and what more can be done, working in cooperation with you to

correct violations of the law involving incorrect and inconspicuous

declarations of the quantity of contents of packages of foods, drugs,

and cosmetics. At your meeting last year we reported on a nationwide survey made specifically to obtain information on this subject

and we supplied to all who were interested a tabulation of our

findings. This involved 106,695 food packages in 35 different commodity groupings.

This special survey differed from our normal and usual approach

which involves the routine checking on quantity of contents on

samples collected for examination for any other violation plus follow-up on any specific complaint received from the trade, consumers,

or cooperating law enforcement officials. For the purj)ose of giving

you up-to-date facts on the results of such routine activities, we

reviewed our file for a 12-month period from April 1960 to April

1961. During this period our laboratories routinely examined all

samples for quantity of contents. We found serious shortages that

required seizure of 14 shipments of foods, such as.' coffee, bakery

products, honey, confectionery and seafood.

In addition, we have under consideration several other samples

where there were shortages. A criminal prosecution case filed some- what earlier and based on spices adulterated with buckwheat hulls

and packaged short weight was terminated late in 1960 with a fine

of $1,000.

In our routine enforcement actions (as well as in some flagrant

cases which are handled separately), we are on the alert for violations of the provisions of the law calling for conspicuous declaration of required information including quantity of contents statements. Canada recently amended its regulations to require such

declarations to appear in boldface type of specified size for each of

four different defined total label areas and the statement is to appear

on the main panel of the label "Or any panel other than the bottom

of the package." This will, of course, affect many firms in this

country shipping their products to Canada. Our regulations do not

carry this specific requirement, but as you know, we have continued

to advise inquirers that to insure compliance with our law mandatory

information should appear conspicuously on the principal display

132
panel of the label. Firms that elect not to follow such advice do so mi their own responsibility and under such circumstances it is nec- essary to make a determination on the basis of the facts in each

particular instance as to whether we believe we can establish that

the law has been violated.

Frequently we uncover serious economic cheats that do not fall

in the weight shortage area but rather in the weight or volume

increase area—for example, due to the addition of water—one of the

oldest and most profitable forms of adulteration. After a two-week

trial in Texas last month the Court found a Houston firm and those

responsible for its operation guilty of shipping watered and sweetened orange juice labeled as fresh orange juice as nature made it,

with nothing added. The product was actually only about one-half

orange juice. The convictions resulted from long and painstaking

work by our inspectors, who used field glasses and cameras to get

evidence on the surreptitious operation after laboratory tests indicated that the product was being adulterated. Whenever inspectors

made regular inspections the hidden sugar could not be located and

the plant always promptly started packing pure orange juice. From

a nearby rented apartment they later observed an unmarked truck

delivering sugar to a shed toward the back of the firm's premises

from which it was carried by bucket brigade into the plant. Still

later evidence was uncovered showing cash purchases of over 750,000

pounds of sugar by employees who were permitted to carry no

identification. Total fines assessed by the court amounted to $20,000

and in addition the firm's officials received prison sentences which

were suspended except for one official who must serve six months.

These officials also have yet to stand trial for perjury during testimony in their own behalf and an injunction order was signed in

May to stop further violations.

At your June meeting last year, Mr. Hubble of our Bureau of

Enforcement related some of the difficulties we have been having in

enforcing the prohibitions of the law against deceptively packaged

foods, drugs, and cosmetics, and described the Delson Candy Company

chocolate covered thin mints case that had been contested by the

owner of the goods. You may recall that it involved a rectangular

package with hollow ends and hollow dividers on which there was

an accurate net weight statement, but in which the candy occupied

only 34% of the cubic content. It contained only 30 mints whereas

the package could have held 41 except for the hollow ends and

dividers.

The lower court decision, which was unfavorable to the Government, was appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. The

unanimous ruling of the three-judge court in effect states that food

cartons may not be larger than reasonably necessary to protect the

contents from damage, taking into account the alternative methods

of protection available. Three principal concepts are developed in

its opinion.

(1) That the consumer has a right to expect that a non-transparent con- tainer of food is reasonably full; (2) That the size of the container is a reliable index to the amount of food

in the package ; and

(3) That the package is not filled with excessive padding.

133
The case has been remanded to the district court judge for reconsideration and findings consistent with the law and the facts. We

propose to step up our regulatory activity against deceptive packaging if the matter is finally adjudicated favorably to the Government. This, of course, will be a long step forward in consumer

protection.

All of us are anxious to see both the Federal and the State or

local laws with respect to weights and measures enforced as effectively as possible.

From the facts in our possession, despite the number of legal

actions we have taken since 1959, there are indications that there are still too many occasions in which a manufacturer produces and

markets foods that are short of the declared weight or volume. We

note that a number of you have also reached the conclusion that

something more needs to be done to give adequate consumer

protection.

I wish I were in a position to tell you that the Food and Drag

Administration is prepared to increase many-fold the effort it will

put in to investigation of short-weight practices during the coming

year. I cannot give you this assurance. We still have many health

problems that require attention. The funds under which we are operating this year and the funds that we have requested for the

following year do not provide for sufficient increase in weights and

measures work to give any degree of assurance that we will begin

to control the problem adequately with resources available to the

Federal Government.

We know that you also are limited in the amount of attention that

you gh*e to the problem.

So the question now is: "What can we do with our limited re- sources to increase significantly the protection that the consumer gets

in (lie weights and measures field?" We have a suggestion for your

consideration which may yield real benefit. And it is based upon

experience that we have had in another field—the animal feed area. Over a period of years we have had insufficient manpower to do

as much work in checking the accuracy of label claims for protein,

fat, and other components of animal feeds as might be desired.

Many States had good programs.

But a State, acting under its laws, often was unable to force a manufacturer in another State to make fundamental correction of

bad practices. So we commissioned many State feed control officials as agents of the Food and Drug Administration for the purpose of

collecting and examining samples of foods originating outside their

States. When such examinations have shown significant shortages

in feed nutrients, the States have forwarded the facts to us and we

have been able to bring action, either seizure or prosecution, under

the Federal law for the violations detected. We have been unable to reimburse the States for their time and expense in this endeavor

but I believe they are satisfied that the benefit to their citizens far

outweighs the relatively minor expense of the cooperative effort in

which they have engaged.

In several States the principal officials responsible for weights and

measures enforcement work already hold similar commissions from

us. We would welcome requests for such commissions from other

officials responsible for this type of work in other States. We would

134
like to see a concerted nationwide effort by the State officials and

the Food and Drug Administration to stamp out the shipment of

short-weighl merchandise. If you can help us by detecting the

cheats that are being perpetrated within your State borders by firms

who escape your jurisdiction because they are located in another

State, we can help you by bringing legal actions where indicated.

We should add one precaxitionary note: Under the Federal law we

may take action against products that are short weight when shipped.

In many instances simple net weight determinations at point of

sale will not be enough to establish a violation.

If you think well of the idea, perhaps you will wish to name representatives to help work out the details of a joint program. We

hope you will look with favor upon our proposal and that our co- ordinated efforts will result in a substantial reduction in short-weight

and short-volume foods in the American market place.

DISCUSSION ON FOREGOING PAPER

Mr. Bowex : Mr. Larrick, this is purely hearsay, so I will mention no names, but it seems a case rather akin to the package of

thin mints. This is an instance of a 5-cent candy bar which is in

a wrapper that apj^ears to be the old-style package, but the candy

bar itself is about as big as one little finger.

I have been told (and this is where the hearsay part comes in)

that that particular candy company has installed an air-blowing

machine which blows up the envelope surrounding the candy bar.

"Whether or not this is so, I do not know. It appears likely from

the appearance of it. Have you come across anything of that sort?

Mr. Larrick : I have not, personally. Bear in mind that we have

had three cases on deceptive packages where the defendant vigorously opposed the prosecution. We have brought many, many cases where the firms did not fight, but in three cases they did fight, and

in all three cases in the lower court the Government lost, and that

is quite unusual for the Food and Drug Administration. "We usually

win about 96 percent of our cases. I strongly suspect that one reason that we have not impressed

the Federal judges is that most of our cases have been on candy, and

if we win this Delson case I hope that our next cases will be on

items that are quite important in the staple food items of the

American diet. But I would say, if we win the Delson case and

you were able to take the hearsay out of the facts that you talked

about and let us know what firm is suspected, we will send an

inspector there and, if they are blowing it up, we will bring a case. Mr. Rheix : Mr. Larrick, in the last several weeks we are getting

bananas in boxes from the Dominican Republic and Honduras with

absolutely no designation of who is responsible, what are the contents, or anything else. I did refer this matter to your Cincinnati

office. I was wondering whether anybody else has come across these.

They are bringing them in by boat all the way to Cincinnati.

Mr. Larrick : I am particularly glad to get a question from you,

sir, because I started my food and drug career in Cincinnati in

1923, and in the days when I really knew something about food and

drug inspection I worked closely with your people.

I have no personal knowledge of this matter. If you referred it to the Chief of the Cincinnati District, I feel confident that the

135
matter will be taken care of, and if it is not I will look into it personally if you will let me have a note.

Mk. Meek : Commissioner Larrick, I want to compliment you for

the splendid suggestion that you have made. I think it will be

workable. I think we could participate in it. I think we have been

following that procedure to a considerable extent over a period of

a long number of years in Indiana. As an illustration, when one of

our local or State inspectors reports to us his findings with regard

to short weight or measure on a product manufactured in another

State and shipped into Indiana, we report that to the Food and

Drug Division. Fortunately, we are located close together in Indiana

in the State Board of Health, and if the director of that division

is unable to work it out he brings it to the attention of the Federal

Food and Drug Administration. I expect you will recall it has

been done on a number of occasions. I am wondering whether you

have the close working arrangements between the weights and

measures and food and drug administration in other States. Would

there be any advantage that I be commissioned by you, when I have

the very close relationship with the Indiana Food and Drug

Division ? Mr. Larrick : I would think that the answer to your question

would be that we would be bound by whatever decision you made

about how you wanted the relationship to work out. If you prefer

to channel it through some other officer who is already commissioned,

I think that would be all right, but if you would like to have the

State weights and measures people commissioned we would be happy

to do that.

We do not want to dominate the States or the cities. We just

want to offer an opportunity to join in this program of commissioning that we think is highly desirable. This all fits into a comment

from your able friend here, Mr. Bussey, that he wants to build a strong relationship among all of the agencies—Federal and Statethat have the position of leadership in this important field of con- sumer protection.

I think we all ought to take advantage of the current philosophy

of the Congress and the pendulum swing in the direction of protection of the American consumer. I have been in this work 38 years

and I have seen the pendulum swing only twice in the direction

where economic violations were really importantly considered by

the Congress and by the public, and I think that we all ought to

cash in on this opportunity to strengthen our laws, to get more

appropriations, to upgrade the caliber of people whom we have at

the Federal, State, and city levels and to really build for the future

in consumer protection.

Mr. Lyles : I was wondering, Mr. Larrick, are the requirements of

the Food and Drug Administration as to solid versus liquid canned

goods such as canned corn and peas, where you have a considerable

amount of liquid in the commodity itself, set forth?

Mr. Larrick: In general, the rule we have followed is that we

will, in the first place, establish for important staple foods a standard-of-fill of container that prescribes a relationship between the

packing media and the food product, but again, in general, if the

packing media is nutritious and consumed it can be declared as

136
part of the net weight or volume. If you want more details on

that, I will call on my expert here, Mr. Beacham.

Me. Kerlix : I would like to have Mr. Beacham elaborate just

a little on this added liquid.

Mr. Beacham: : We have two problems. First, an accurate state- ment of the quantity of contents is required, and for practically all

foods the statement of contents includes both the liquid and the

solid portion. Then we have a question of the relationship of the

solid material, being the more valuable portion of the food, to the

least valuable portion, usually the liquid portion. That is usually

taken care of by a means of standard-of-fill of the container, and

we have established such standards for some foods. But there are

a great many foods for which we have not established any such

standard, and here is an area where abuse can exist and does exist,

in that food, which is accurately labeled as regards the total quantity

of contents, is really not properly packed if there is an excess of

packing medium present. That matter must be taken care of by a standard of fill of container.

Mr. Kerlin : Has a standard of fill been established for potatoes ? Mr. Beacham : No. If my recollection serves me right, we do not

have a standard of fill of container for canned white potatoes.

Mr. Kerlin: Can we do something about that?

Mr. Beacham: We can establish such a standard if we have the

technical facts to support it. Mr. Kerlin : Frankly, 7 ounces of potatoes in a 1-pound can, especially when very few people use the juice of the potatoes, is a little

ridiculous.

Mr. Beacham : I am inclined to agree with you. In canned food, a rough rule of thumb is that the solid portion of the pack will be

two-thirds of the total content of the can, with one-third liquid

medium. In the case of 7 ounces of potatoes and 9 ounces of liquid,

we do not have that ratio. That would indicate it contains excess

liquid.

Mr. Kerlin : What would be your recommended procedure, so we

can get something done?

Mr. Beacham: An examination of what should be the proper

relationship between the solid portion and the liquid portion would

involve putting up experimental packs and a study of the relationship of the effect of the size of the potatoes. I am guessing that

perhaps you could get more small potatoes in than you could large

ones. You would have to investigate this carefully and see whether

a single standard fill of container would cover all sizes or whether

there would have to be variations in the requirements to meet the

changes that size would impose.

Mr. Kerlin: One other question: Under your rules and regulations, if a package is labeled "Net Weight 1 pound," and then an

added statement "includes added water" or some such statement

appears on the label, would this be legal?

Mr. Beacham: On unstandardized food, the statement of water

added would be unnecessary, because there must be a statement

of all of the ingredients. If they put in an accurate statement of

quantity of contents, that would take care of that obligation of

the law.

137
If Ave had a standard of fill of container, establishing the relationship between the solid and liquid portion, then a statement

that there was excess water would not excuse that failure to meet

the standard. Where standards of fill of container are established,

there usually is a provision for labeling substandard products that

do not meet the standards, and in that case there might be a prescribed statement such as "substandard in fill" or "contains excess

liquid," but that would be dependent upon the terms of the

standard.

Mr. Larrick: I would like to point out that we have to make a choice very often as to what areas we will work in. We have had

at the beginning one man to work on food standards, and there are thousands of them to be dealt with. We increased that to three, and

unfortunately one of them no longer is with us. We have the task

of deciding where we will denote our limited resources. For example, today there came OArer my desk a case that involves

a large firm in Chicago that buys physicians' samples of drugs in

the thousands of dollars' worth, and we discovered by sampling

their material that they have gotten mixed up and, in place of a simple A'itamin pill that the label says is in the package, they have

substituted a drug which is extremely dangerous.

We have the whole field of health and filth and economic cheats,

and I am sorry to say that Ave haA*e not been able to moAr e as fast

in this economic cheat field as we would like to, but, as we increase our facilities (and AA*e are). Ave are going to step it up. I suspect

that the example that you have giAT en, if the facts are as you have

stated them, is an example of an area that Ave should get busy on. REPORT OF COMMITTEE ON SPECIFICATIONS AND TOLERANCES

Presented by C. L. Jackson, Chairman, Chief, Division of Economic

Practices, Department of Agriculture, State of Wisconsin

l Prior to the presentation of the formal report of the committee, Mr. Jackson

made the following informal statement.)

It is the purpose of this report to bring about a full understanding

of the A

r arious items before the committee and of the several issues

involved in each of them and, in addition, to present the recommendations of the committee for action by the Conference. I Avant to

emphasize that free and open discussion is Avelcome. I must caution, hoAveA^er, that care must be exercised in the consideration of

each item. Individuals should be deliberate and should not be too

hasty in attempting to make final judgment, under pressure, without

considering all factors that are involved.

It is the feeling of the committee that any matter that merits the

committee's attention should be thoroughly studied both by the committee and by the members of the Conference, who Avill make the

final decision. There will be a reluctance on the part of the committee members to agree readily to a change in the final report, since

any such change obviously will not have been given a careful

analysis.

(The formal report of the committee follows.)

138
In order to afford the opportunity for oral presentations to the

committee and in order that the committee might discuss in detail

the matters on its agenda, an interim meeting of the committee was

held in Washington, D.C., January 30 and 31, 1961. During the open

sessions of this meeting, representatives of business and industry

and weights and measures officials presented themselves before the

committee and made known their recommendations. In addition to

this meeting, consultation among committee members and between

the committee and weights and measures officials, industry representatives, and others has been earned on by correspondence.

A tentative report was prepared by the committee and this was

distributed widely. At an open hearing held on the afternoon of

Monday, June 12, at the headquarters hotel, the tentative report

was ottered for discussion, item by item. The hearing was well

attended and numerous comments were made and suggestions were

ottered reltaive to the tentative proposals of the committee. These

matters were further considered at an executive session of the committee following the open hearing.

Presented below are the final recommendations of the committee,

together with appropriate comments, grouped under the code headings as found in Handbook 44, 2d Edition, as amended through the

45th National Conference.

GENERAL

The 45th National Conference, in 1960, adopted a recommendation of the Committee on Laws and Regulations that the Model

State Weights and Measures Law be so written as to exclude from

the "commercial" category those devices that have been considered

commercial only because a charge is made for their use and over which no commodity, thing, or service is bought or sold (for example, penny person weighers). The Conference then directed the

Specifications and Tolerances Committee to include in its tentative

report the amendments to the Handbook 44 codes that would be

necessary to make these codes compatible with the Model Law. Such

amendments are listed below.

General Code

Application paragraph G-A.l. COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT.—Delete the

clause starting with the comma in the next-to-the-last line.

Scale Code

1. Application paragraph A.2. COMMERCIAL PERSON WEIGHERS.

Delete entire paragraph.

2. Definition paragraph D.1T. PERSON WEIGHER—Delete entire paragraph.

3. Specification paragraph S.l.7.3. ADJUSTMENT.—Delete, in lines 2 and 3, "a person-weigher or".

4. Specification paragraph S.l.7.4. LEVEL-INDICATING MEANS.—Delete,

in line 2, "a person weigher, or off". Also delete the comma in line 3.

5. Delete the center head that follows paragraph S.22. on page 56a.

6. Specification paragraphs S.30. through S.36.—Delete these seven paragraphs.

7. Regulation paragraph R.13. READABILITY OF RECORDED REPRESENTATIONS OF PERSON WEIGHERS.—Delete entire paragraph.

8. Regulation paragraph R.14. OWNERSHIP IDENTIFICATION ON PERSON WEIGHERS.—Delete entire paragraph.

DISCUSSION OF FOREGOING ITEM

Mr. J. T. Kennedy : In the District of Columbia we must consider

a person-weighing scale as a commercial scale. Although only one

613254—61 10 139
cent is charged for service, there is involved a payment for the weighing service. Accordingly, as far as the District of Columbia is con- cerned, we cannot adopt these amendments.

(At this point Mr. Meek, the Conference Chairman, assumed the chair.)

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor,

this item was adopted by the Conference by voice vote.

)

GENERAL CODE

The committee has noted that general application paragraph

G-A.l. COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT, the paragraph that sets forth the general area in which the codes are to be applied, makes

no mention of either devices for use in law enforcement activities or noncommercial devices being tested upon request, whereas, with re- spect to certain specific classes of scales, both of these categories are mentioned in the Scale Code in application paragraph A.3. WHEELLOAD WEIGHERS, WHEEL-LOAD SCALES, AND AXLELOAD SCALES. To clarify this situation and to simplify the

language of the paragraph, the committee recommends that the general application paragraph G-A.l. COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT

be amended to read as follows

G-A.1. COMMERCIAL AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT.—These

specifications, tolerances, and regulations apply (1) to commercial weighing

and measuring equipment, that is, to weights and measures and weighing and

measuring devices commercially used or employed in establishing the size,

quantity, extent, area, or measurement of quantities, things, produce, or arti- cles for distribution or consumption, purchased, offered or submitted for sale,

hire, or award, or in computing any basic charge or payment for services ren- dered on the basis of weight or measure; and (2) to weighing and measuring

equipment in official use for the enforcement of law. (These requirements

should be used as a guide by the weights and measures official when courtesy

examinations are made, upon request, of noncommercial equipment.)

(The General Code amendment was adopted by voice vote.)

SCALE CODE

1. Application paragraph A.3. WHEEL-LOAD WEIGHERS,

WHEEL-LOAD SCALES, AND AXLE-LOAD SCALES.—For

reasons explained above, delete the last clause of this paragraph,

making the paragraph read as follows:

A.3. WHEEL-LOAD WEIGHERS, WHEEL-LOAD SCALES, AND AXLELOAD SCALES.—The requirements for wheel-load weighers, wheel-load scales,

and axle-load scales apply to such scales in official use for the enforcement of

traffic and 'highway laws.

(Item 1 of the Scale Code was adopted by voice vote.)

2. Definition paragraph D.12. PREPACKAGING SCALE.—The

Southern Weights and Measures Association recommended that the

committee consider a new and more extensive definition of "prepackaging scale." The committee has given this recommendation its very

careful study and has consulted weights and measures officials and

representatives of industry. No instances of misunderstanding or confusion have been found. While it is frequently possible to make

minor improvements in language, the committee feels that no appreciable benefits would accrue from any rewording of this definition

140
paragraph that has been proposed or that the committee has been able

to develop. The committee, accordingly, recommends no action.

(Item 2 of the Scale Code was adopted by voice vote.)

3. Definition paragraph D.37. TELL-TALE ATTACHMENT;

regulation paragraphs R.4.2. ON LIVESTOCK SCALES and R.4.4.

ON VEHICLE, WHEEL-LOAD, AND AXLE-LOAD SCALES

The committee believes that the "tell-tale attachment" defined in

definition paragraph D.37. and in regulation paragraphs R.4.2. and

R.4.4. has very little, if any, national significance in commercial

weighing. The very limited use of these devices appears to be quite

localized. Since the definition and the references in the two regulations have been and are causing confusion and lack of understanding

among weights and measures officials, and since it is obvious that this

special attachment for a large-capacity scale does not play an important nationwide role in commercial weighing, the committee recom- mends that all references to it be deleted from the Scale Code, as follows

Definition paragraph D.37. TELL-TALE ATTACHMENT.—Delete entire

paragraph.

Regulation paragraph R.4.2. ON LIVESTOCK SCALES.—Delete last sentence. Regulation paragraph R.4.4. ON VEHICLE, WHEEL-LOAD, AND AXLELOAD SCALES.—Delete last sentence.

(Item 3 of the Scale Code was adopted by voice vote.)

4. Specification paragraph S.13.3. LABEL RECORDER.—The

Southern Weights and Measures Association has recommended that

specification paragraph S.13.3. be rescinded in order to permit

"analog" weight representation of weights on labels issued by a prepackaging scale. This recommendation was endorsed by the Scale

Manufacturers Association.

This matter was thoroughly explored prior to and during the 45th

National Conference. The Conference then adopted the amendment

represented by specification paragraph S.13.3., and presented as part

of its reason : "It should be kept in mind that, when a prepackaging

scale prints weight values and money values directly on a package

label, such printing must be so as to meet all legal requirements for

package marking."

Nothing has been presented to the committee that would alter this

viewpoint and, in reference to the recommendation, the committee

reiterates the obligation of Handbook 44 to prohibit devices the use

of which might be construed as being in violation of other phases of

weights and measures law.

The committee has been reliably informed by the scale manufacturers most affected that necessary engineering and production alterations cannot be completed by the effective date presently stipulated

in the code ; accordingly, the committee recommends that specification

paragraph S.13.3. LABEL RECORDER (Scale Code, page 56,

Handbook 44) be amended by changing the date "July 1, 1961"

appearing in the first line of the paragraph to read "March 1, 1962."

(Item 4 of the Scale Code was adopted by voice vote.)

141
5. Tolerance paragraph T.2.1.2. TO SHIFT TESTS.—For many

years the code has provided a special tolerance applicable to shift

tests on vehicle scales which reads as follows: "On a vehicle scale

the tolerances on corner tests shall be twice the basic tolerances, but

on a corner test at a particular load, the algebraic mean of the errors on the two corners at each end of the scale shall be not greater than

the basic tolerance for the load in question." The committee is of

the opinion that practically all weights and measures officials are applying section rather than corner tests on vehicle scales and that,

accordingly, this special shift-test tolerance is neither required nor

used. It should be pointed out that this special tolerance does not

apply to any class of scales other than vehicle scales. The committee recommends that tolerance paragraph T.2.1.2. TO SHIFT

TESTS be amended to read as follows:

T.2.1.2. TO SHIFT TESTS.—Basic tolerances shall be applied.

(Item 5 of the Scale Code was adopted by voice vote.)

6. Tolerance paragraph T.2.34. FOE RAILWAY TRACK

SCALES.—As indicated in the footnote on page 67 of Handbook 44,

the tolerances set forth for railway track scales, together with asso- ciated text, are set forth in the form in which they have been published by the National Bureau of Standards. Paragraph B on page 69 reads: "The maintenance tolerance (applicable to scales in

use) for scales in grain-weighing service is ±0.10 percent of the test load being utilized, applied as follows : . . ." The committee has

received a written communication from Mr. A. S. Krefting, Chairman, American Railway Engineering Association Committee No. 14.

in which it is pointed out that Committee 14 will recommend to the

AREA that this special tolerance for railway track scales in grainweighing service be deleted, thus making such scales subject to the

basic tolerance of =t0.20 percent of the test load. Mr. Krefting has

suggested that the National Conference similarly modify the language in tolerance paragraph T.2.3.4. FOR RAILWAY TRACK

SCALES.

The committee has not had an opportunity to explore this matter

I Ik troughly, nor would it be disposed to make a recommendation to the Conference until it has been apprised of the final action of the

AREA. The committee feels that this matter requires further study;

therefore, it is proposed that this item be retained on the agenda of

the committee.

7. Tolerances for large-capacity scales.—The Southern Weights

and Measures Association has recommended that the National Conference "review the tolerances for large-capacity scales." During

the interim meeting of this committee, the structure of tolerances

for large-capacity scales was discussed at some length with representatives of the manufacturers of such scales. The scale manufacturers and the Scale Manufacturers Association have A

r olunteered

to study this matter thoroughly and to be in further communication

with the committee. The committee, in the meantime, plans to con- duct its own study. The committee desires to express its sincere

appreciation to the Southern Weights and Measures Association for

bringing this matter officially before the National Conference.

142
8. Ri gulatwn paragraph #4. VALUE OF MINIMUM GRADUATED INTERVAL.—

(a) R.4.1. ON RETAIL FOOD SCALES—It has been pointed

out to the committee that certain complications arise from the

stipulation that "The value of the minimum graduated interval on a scale used for the retail sale of foodstuffs shall be not greater than

1 ounce." because the word "retail" is not defined. A specific example

is the sale of meats in locker plants, where there frequently are individual retail sales of 50 to 100 pounds, and even more. Dial

scales with at least 125-pound capacities have been used in this service, and to require such scales to have 1-ounce graduated intervals

and thus i/g-ounce minimum acceptance tolerances seems impractical.

One suggestion being considered is that regulation paragraph R.4.1.

be rewritten along the following lines

R.4.1. ON RETAIL FOOD SCALES.—The value of the minimum graduated interval on a scale used for the retail sale of foodstuffs weighing 30

pounds or less shall be uot greater than 1 ounce. (For retail sale of foodstuffs weighing more than 30 pounds, see G-R.3.)

The reasoning behind this suggestion is that computing scales with

1-ounce graduations are generally available up to 30 pounds capacity,

and are not available at capacities of greater than 30 pounds.

The committee feels that this matter requires further stndy ; therefore, it is proposed that this item be retained on the agenda of the

committee.

(b) R.4.4. ON VEHICLE, WHEEL-LOAD, AND AXLE-LOAD

SCALES.—The "Weights and Measures Division of the Ohio Department of Agriculture and the Scale Manufacturers Association

have recommended to the committee that wheel-load and axle-load

scales be removed from this paragraph, which requires a minimum

graduated interval of 20 pounds, and that such scales then be permitted to be covered by regulation paragraph R.4.7., which requires

minimum graduated intervals not greater than 0.1 percent of the

nominal capacity of the scale or 50 pounds, whichever is less. The

committee understands that these recommendations were made principally to cover (1) wheel-load and axle-load scales considered to

be noncommercial and tested only on request, and (2) wheel-load

and axle-load scales that were considered to be commercial only be- cause a charge was made for the weighing operation. Since the committee is recommending that the General Code and the Scale Code

be amended to eliminate the latter, and since the first category is not

included under weights and measures law, it is deemed by the committee that this would not be an appropriate change in the requirements.

The wheel-load and axle-load scales that will now be specifically

covered by the code are those official scales that are nsed by law en- forcement officers to enforce highway load-limit laws. Not a single

Request has been received by the committee from such officials that

this requirement be liberalized to permit 50-pound graduations on

these scales. It must be conceded that, where enforcement of law is pased on weighing, both accuracy and precision are critical. It is the judgment of the committee that any such liberalization in minimum graduated intervals as has been suggested would unnecessarily

143
detract from good weighing practice; accordingly, the committee

recommends no action.

DISCUSSION OF FOREGOING ITEM

Mr. Sanders : During our presentation to the committee we stated

that we had made a limited survey of the opinion of the State highway enforcement officers. Six of the seven States that responded to

our questionnaire were in favor of a 50-pound graduation on axleload scales. We have strongly recommended, and Ave do so now, that

the Conference permit 50-pound graduations for these scales. The

State highway departments are going to continue to purchase scales

with 50-pound graduations, and we think the National Conference

should go along with this proposition.

Mr. Kendall : I would like to take this opportunity to clarify the

position of Toledo Scale with respect to item 8(b) of the report

regarding the maximum value of the minimum graduated interval on

wheel-load and axle-load scales. Discussions with various weights

and measures officials since the open meeting on Monday reveal there

may be some misunderstanding.

1. Toledo Scale has no intention of proposing a cheaper grade of

scale. We use this same scale with 10,000 X 10 pounds or even

5,000 X 5 pounds dial for industrial application, such as cupola

charging or weighing heavy ladles of molten metal, where a rugged

lever system is required. Toledo has no problem meeting the re- quired tolerances for the 20,000 X 20 pound dial with unit weights

for the axle-load scale when tested Avith test weights.

2. Toledo has no direct interest. We do not operate any truck

lines, so are not directly concerned with any delays in the weighing

operation. You might say our interest should be in the opposite

direction, because we would realize a greater sales volume with the

appropriate $150 or $200 extra selling price for the unit weight scale.

We originally made the proposal with the idea of promoting the

public interest. The primary consideration Avas the simpler, and less

time-consuming weighing operation which Avould result. This additional selling price is but a small percentage of the installed cost

of such a scale.

The basis for the proposal was that tests made by ourselves and

others shoAv that, when the same axle of the same truck is repeatedly

AA'eighed on the same scale, weight indications will vary by as much

as seA7 eral hundred pounds. By inference, this condition is recognized in H-44, regulation B.19, which, effective July 1, 1957, prohibits adding the weight of individual axles to arrive at the commercial aveight of a \

rehicle.

We still feel that specifying 20 pounds as the minimum graduation for a Avheel- or axle-load scale is requiring a scale much more

sensitive than is practical for this application, and a number of

States feel the same AA? ay. Revising paragraphs R.4.4. and R.4.7. as suggested aa-ou1c1 permit those States Avhich prefer 50-pound

graduations to purchase such scales Avithout taking exception to

H--44. Any States which prefer 20-pound graduations can specify

them when purchasing. We understand California prefers 20 pounds

because they frequently install both a vehicle and an axle scale and

desire uniformity. NeAv Jersey also could specify 20-pound gradua144
Hon, particularly -when three axle-load scales are installed, but I

would not want to express an opinion as to whether that combination

constitutes a vehicle scale.

We are making these comments for information only, with no re- quest for specific action by this Conference.

(Item S(b) of the Scale Code was adopted by voice vote.)

(c) R.4.7. ON LARGE-CAPACITY SCALES OTHER THAN

LIVESTOCK, ANIMAL, VEHICLE, WHEEL-LOAD, AXLELOAD, HAND-OPERATED GRAIN HOPPER, CRANE, AND

RAILWAY TRACK SCALES.—The Scale Manufacturers Association renewed the recommendation submitted by it on April 14, 1960,

with respect to the code requirements in the area of maximum value

of minimum graduated interval on large-capacity scales covered in

regulation paragraph R.4.7. That recommendation was in three

parts: (1) that the nominal capacity (see definition paragraph D.l.)

of an automatic-indicating scale be limited to the largest weight that can be indicated on the reading face; (2) that the maximum value

of the minimum graduated interval on large-capacity, automaticindicating scales be not greater than 0.1 percent of the nominal

capacity of the scale, or 14 pound, whichever is greater, and in any

case not greater than 50 pounds; and (3) that the maximum value

of the minimum graduated interval on a weighbeam scale be not

greater than 0.05 percent of the nominal capacity of the scale, or

Y± pound, whichever is greater, and in any case not greater than

50 pounds.

The Scale Manufacturers Association submits that these stipulations would require scales with smaller minimum graduated intervals than presently are required in regulation paragraph R.4.7., and

further that scale manufacturers presently are offering devices that

conform to this proposed requirement.

The committee has studied this matter for several years and is of

the firm opinion that the Conference must continue diligently to

avoid discrimination between two designs of similar equipment operating in the same field of commerce (for example, a weighbeamtype scale and a dial scale of relatively the same capacity). The

present requirements are nondiscriminatory, entirely defensible, and

enforceable.

It always has been the policy of the National Conference to specify

only such requirements as are necessary to provide equity in commercial transactions for both buyers and sellers. The committee is con- vinced that the present requirement provides this safeguard. Accordingly, the committee recommends no action.

^

9. Regulation paragraph B.9. APPROACHES TO VEHICLE

SCALES.—This paragraph provides that "At each end of a vehicle

scale there should be a straight approach in the same plane as the

platform for a distance equal to at least the length of the scale

platform or 40 feet, whichever is less." It will be noted that this is a "should" paragraph, whereas practically all other paragraphs in

the codes are "shall" paragraphs, as they properly should be, since,

upon promulgation, they are given the force and effect of law. It

has been and is conceded that in many cases, because of real estate

limitations, terrain, and the like, it is not practical to provide straight

145
and level approaches such as are recommended in regulation paragraph E.9.

With the adoption of regulation paragraph R.19. SINGLEDRAFT VEHICLE WEIGHING, which prohibits multiple-draft

weighing of highway vehicles, the significance of the approach to a vehicle scale was minimized; moreover, confusion is introduced

through the interpretation by manufacturers' representatives, weights

and measures officials, and others that this is a mandatory requirement.

To eliminate confusion and to clear the code of a paragraph of

doubtful value, the committee recommends that regulation paragraph B.9. be deleted.

(Item 9 of the Scale Code was adopted by voice vote.)

10. Installation and other recommendations.—In its report to the

45th National Conference, the committee noted that it was retaining

on its agenda a suo-o-estion of a State weights and measures official

that there be included in Handbook 44 certain recommendations con- cerning the installation of pit-type scales. The committee also noted

that the Scale Manufacturers Association had agreed to study and

make recommendation on this matter.

A specific recommendation has been received from the Scale Manuacturers Association that takes the form of a rather lengthy series

of requirements pertaining to the installation of vehicle and livestock scales. After diligent study and thorough consideration, the

committee now believes that it would be inappropriate to include

provisions of this type in the Handbook 44 codes.

The Conference, in the development of its device codes, has at- tempted to avoid the inclusion of design and engineering specifications, and thus to limit the code, insofar as practicable, to performance requirements. Design and engineering specifications have been

included only when such specifications were considered necessary to

insure dependable and continued accuracy. The inclusion of design

specifications with respect to pit construction and installation would,

it seems, be contrary to this principle.

It is obvious, and the committee emphasizes, that the installation

of any weighing or measuring device is vitally important with re- spect to performance of that device. It follows that, if installation

stipulations are to be set forth for one or two classes of devices, they

likewise should be set forth for all other classes. The preparation

of such material would be a major project, which would be highly

complicated by widely varying conditions and circumstances, in different locations, throughout the country.

The committee is sincerely grateful to the Scale Manufacturers

Association for the obvious effort that has gone into the submitted

proposal. The committee nonetheless feels that installation recom- mendations are more nearly education than law and that they should

be handled informally by representatives of scale manufacturers, by

weights and measures officials, and by others who are brought into a discussion concerning the installation of any commercial weighing

or measuring device.

As an alternative, the committee explored a plan whereby there

was developed by the National Conference, through its Committee on

146
Education, certain informal Conference recommendations on selec-

: tion. installation, and maintenance of devices. The committee submitted to the Committee on Education for its consideration as the

firsl of such formal recommendations, one pertaining- to vehicle

scales. The Committee on Education submitted this first recom- mendation for action by the 46th National Conference on Weights

and Measures on Wednesday, June 14.

DISCUSSION OF FOREGOING ITEM

Mr. Sanders: The Scale Manufacturers Association prepared certain formal recommendations with respect to this matter. We

referred them to this committee, and we very strongly urge that the

Conference consider in the future some sort of firm recommendations

Covering the installation of large-capacity scales. We hope that this

committee will consider adding such recommendations to Handbook 44 to cover the installation of these scales.

11. Prepackaging scale.—The committee has been studiously and

thoroughly exploring the prepackaging scale as a commercial weighing device. When the Scale Code was first amended to include special provisions for such scales, some doubts were expressed by ex- perienced officials as to the appropriateness of such action. It was

pointed out then that the true role of the prepackaging scale in

commerce is that of a tool or accessory in the process of preparing

packaged food; and since there are very special provisions in weights

and measures law regarding the accuracy of the quantity declaration on packages, the propriety and appropriateness of "sealing" prepackaging scales were questioned.

Two points seem to be at issue. First, the packaging equipment

used in the determination of the quantities of the thousands of different factory-packed items has not, as a rule, been controlled by

the weights and measures official. Here there is permitted (or re- quired) to prevail the philosophy "the package speaks for itself."

Just how the quantity is determined in such instances is considered

to be of no official consequence, so long as the law has established

specific control over such quantity. (It is an interesting fact that

many factory-packed packages are filled volumetrically, even though

the quantity of the contents of such packages is declared in terms of

net weight.) It is probable that the establishment of official control over the prepackaging scale was the result of the physical movement

of the computing scale from the meat counter of the service-type

market to the back room of the prepack market. The official control

simply followed this movement.

The second point has to do with the relationship of scale approval

to official action on packages. The contention has been made that an

inconsistency is established when the official approves, under law,

the use of a prepackaging scale that is within the legally established

tolerances, yet has an error of OA^er-registration, and then disapproves

packages carefully weighed over the scale when the net quantity of

the contents of these packages averages less than the quantity declared, this latter action being entirely in accord with the provisions

of the "package" law.

The problem grows as prepackaging increases.

147
The committee is not yet prepared to submit a definite recommendation with respect to prepackaging scales. In its deliberations,,

the committee would find most helpful constructive comments from;

qualified weights and measures officials and from others having am

interest in this matter.

A possible approach might be to follow, in the case of prepackaging scales, the quoted principle "The package speaks for itself" byremoving from the Scale Code all references to prepackaging scales

and by considering the Model Law as to its coverage of such devices.

LIQUID-MEASURING DEVICE CODE

1. Return to zero.—The committee received from the Southern!

Weights and Measures Association a recommendation that was en- dorsed by the Gasoline Pump Manufacturers Association, the effect

of which would be to amend the Code for Liquid-Measuring Devices

to permit on retail liquid-fuel dispensers (gasoline pumps) recording

elements that are cumulative in nature—that is, recording elements

that would not return to zero before each delivery, but rather would 1 print a totalized figure representing gallons at the start of a delivery

and another totalized figure representing the gallons at the end of

the delivery. After a study of this recommendation, the committee

has concluded that, while such a change in the code might serve as a convenience to some users of retail liquid-fuel devices, it definitely

would be a distinct loss to consumers.

Since mechanical devices for measuring liquid fuels for automobiles were first placed into service, weights and measures officials have

insisted that there be means by which such devices could be returned

to zero prior to each delivery, and that the indicating or recording

elements be so returned. Progress in the design of such devices,

the expiration of patents, and consumer interests have brought about

the present nonretroactive requirement that provides specifically that

a retail liquid-fuel device must be equipped with a "zero-setback

interlock" (see S.ll.l of the Liquid Measuring Device Code) and

thus be returned to zero prior to each delivery. On this point the

committee feels quite strongly that the Conference must stand firm;

accordingly, the committee recommends no action.

DISCUSSION OF FOREGOING ITEM

Mr. G. T. Weight: In the tentative report the reasons given for

the committee recommendation of no action are based upon the:

assumption that the recommendation had to do with the elimination

of the present requirements for primary indicating elements. The

code is very clear in differentiating between indicating and recording

elements, and, in the recommendation of the Southern Weights and

Measures Association, upon which the Gasoline Pump Manufacturers

Association based its endorsement, there was no reference whatsoever

to any change in the requirements for primary indicating elements.

The committee notes that, since mechanical devices for measuring

liquids first were placed in service, weights and measures officials

have insisted that there be means by which the indicating elements

of such devices could be returned to zero after each delivery and that

the indicating or recording elements be so returned. However, as a] matter of fact, there is no mention in the Liquid-Measuring Device

148
Code of the return of recording elements to zero. I make that point

because I feel that the committee may have misinterpreted the

original proposal.

There are two types of retail fuel dispensers for large deliveries

to trucks, and each of these types sometimes is equipped with an

auxiliary ticket-printing device. These ticket printers are not in any

way a substitute for, nor do they eliminate, the necessity of the

primary indicating element to which is connected the zero-set-back

interlock. We never have suggested any change in the requirements

covering indicating elements.

Since it appears that the committee's recommendation is based on

a misinterpretation, I strongly urge that the committee either rescind

its recommendation or retain this item on its agenda for action next

year. We feel that our suggestion has considerable merit, and we

feel further that our suggestion was not considered by the committee,

whose decision was based on something we did not suggest.

(At this point Mr. J. T. Kennedy spoke in opposition to the committee recom- mendation and. on his motion, seconded from the floor, the Conference directed

by voice vote that this item be retained by the committee for further study.)

2. Specification paragraph 8.11.3. VISIBILITY.—The Gasoline

Pump Manufacturers Association made an urgent plea to the committee for relief from the requirements stipulated in specification

paragraph S.11.3. that "The bottom of the lowest indicating element of a retail motor-fuel device shall be at least 36 inches above the

normal level upon which the receiving vehicle or vessel stands. The

indications of a retail motor-fuel device shall be readable from any

position within a field of 120°, defined by two vertical planes each

passing through the center of the face of the device at an angle

of 30°." The industry submitted that engineering advances in the

design of retail gasoline dispensers were being restricted by this

special requirement relating to visibility. No specific example was

pointed out, however, where such restriction had occurred in the

past, or was occurring at the present. The further contention was

made that these special requirements are not necessary for the proper

protection of the consumer. Industry representatives also pointed

out that, with respect to all other weighing and measuring devices

used in retail trade, officials were relying on the language of General

Code regulation paragraph G-R.l. POSITION OF EQUIPMENT.

In the industry's brief, the recommendation included an amendment to specification paragraph S.3.1. READABILITY according

to the words that are in italics: "Quantity and money-value indications shall be readable from any reasonable customer position within

the limits of the device." It was pointed out to representatives of the

industry that the language of specification paragraph S.3.1. as it now

stands is almost identical with and certainly would be interpreted

the same as the language in general regulation paragraph G-R.l.,

and that the suggested addition would weaken the requirement and

introduce confusion in interpretation.

The special requirements contained in specification paragraph

S.11.3. are of many years' standing. They were inserted originally

because of the special problems of visibility brought about by the

fact that the retail purchaser of gasoline is usually seated in his car when the purchase is made. While the committee feels that this

149
industry recommendation deserves careful study and consideration, J

it feels also that this study should extend to all weights and measures

officials and others who are interested. The manufacturers of retail

gasoline dispensers have presented no specific evidence or examples

that would require specification paragraph S.11.3. to be modified or J deleted. Pending such demonstrated need, the committee recom- mends no change in the code at this time.

DISCUSSION OF FOREGOING ITEM

Mr. G. T. Wright : The committee states that the manufacturers

of retail gasoline dispensers have presented no specific evidence or examples that would require the modification or deletion of specification paragraph S.11.3. This is correct and is of importance to us. It presents the view that a manufacturer would be required to invest

design, engineering, and fabrication costs in a device that might not

meet code requirements and then submit the device to the committee

in the hope that conflicting requirements would be reconciled. TVe

contend that a manufacturer should be able to explore the merits of a requirement and receive such relief as would clear the way for new I

design. We contend the 36-inch height requirement of this specifica- I

tion is arbitrary. It was based on a condition that existed many I

years ago and that no longer exists. We should hope that the industry would be free to manufacture devices and locate them anywhere

as long as General Code requirements on visibility or retail devices are met.

(Mr. Anderson, Mr. Christie, and Mr. J. T. Kennedy also spoke in opposition to the committee recommendation.)

(Mr. Kennedy moved that the first sentence of specification paragraph

S.11.3. be deleted. This motion was seconded from the floor, and Mr. Leithanser and Mr. W. C. Hughes spoke in favor of the amendment. Mr. Harris

spoke against the amendment. On motion of Mr. F. F. Thompson, seconded

from the floor, this item of the committee report was laid on the table for one year by voice vote of the Conference.

)

3. During the open hearing on Monday afternoon there was presented for the consideration of the committee, by Mr. Greene of

Connecticut, a type of construction of certain remote-pumping

gasoline dispensers such that the hose nozzle can ostensibly be hung

up in normal manner but without actuating the set-back interlock.

Thus a particular delivery may be begun without resetting the indicating elements to zero. The committee, after exploring various

methods of meeting this situation, is convinced that the problem can adequately be met by vigorous enforcement under G-S.2. FACILITATION OF FRAUD and G-R.5. METHOD OF OPERATION,

and that this approach is to be preferred to the drafting of new

specification language.

(Item 3 of the Liquid-Measuring Device Code was adopted by voice vote.)

VEHICLE TANK CODE

1. Specification paragraph 810.10. MANIFOLD.—The Southern

Weights and Measures Association recommended that the National

Conference amend specification paragraph S.10.10. to specifically permit "bottom loading/' The committee is of the opinion that nothing } in the General Code or in the Vehicle Tank Code prohibits bottom

150
loading so long as other code requirements are complied with. It is

a general legal principle that what is not prohibited is permitted;

therefore, the committee sees no advantage in making special mention

of this method. Accordingly, the committee recommends no action.

(Item 1 of the Vehicle Tank Code was adopted by voice vote.)

2. Specification paragraph S.10.1. COMPARTMENT DISTORTION.—Just prior to the loth National Conference on Weights and

Measures, the National Truck Tank and Trailer Tank Institute, supported by the National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc., requested that the

committee reconsider the requirements set forth in the then specification paragraph S.l. (now S.10.1) that the bulkhead distortion of a

vehicle-tank compartment (caused by the filling of the compartment

or compartments adjoining) be limited to y2 pint per 200 gallons or

fraction thereof, or 1 pint, whichever is greater.

The committee considered this matter prior to the 45th Conference

and recommended several amendments, the principal of which was to

move the questioned requirements to the sections of the code applicable only to vehicle tanks used as measures. (See item 10, page 98,

NHS Miscellaneous Publication 235, Report of the 45th National

Conference on Weights and Measures, 1960.) The committee did not

feel justified in recommending to the Conference for adoption, based on the information and evidence presented, the rather liberal modification of the distortion requirement. The National Truck Tank and

Trailer Tank Institute has renewed its request and recommendation of

this amendment, and the committee since has been attempting to get all

possible information on this request, including an official expression

of opinion from the North American Gasoline Tax Conference, an

organization of State tax officials, many of whom are concerned with

the accuracy of vehicle-tank compartments when these are used to measure petroleum products for tax purposes, the American Petroleum Institute Committee on Weights and Measures, weights and

measures officials, and others. The study of the North American

Gasoline Tax Conference has not yet been completed. The Committee on Specifications and Tolerances also has certain other matters in

this area to be explored.

The recommendation of the National Truck Tank and Trailer

Tank Institute is that the distortion formula in specification paragraph S.10.1. be amended to allow "a tolerance of .4 of 1 percent of

the net vehicle-tank or tank-compartment capacity, expressed in gallons up to 625 gallons, and tolerance of vehicle tank or tank compartments of capacities 625 gallons and up limited to maximum of

2.5 gallons."

Neither an exhaustive study by the committee nor a survey by

the North American Gasoline Tax Conference has disclosed evidence

of any hardship resulting from specification paragraph S.10.1. Accordingly, the committee recommends no action.

(Item 2 of the Vehicle Tank Code was adopted by voice vote.)

FARM MILK TANK CODE

Tolerances.—The committee's final report to the 45th National

Conference indicated the retention on its agenda of the matter relat151
ing to a recommendation from a State weights and measures official

that the tolerances on farm milk tanks in the smaller sizes be re- duced. During the year the committee has been in consultation with

the National Association of Dairy Equipment Manufacturers, the

Dairy Industry Supply Association, and other weights and measures

officials, and now recommends the following amendments to the Farm

Milk Tank Code, amendments that have the endorsement of both

organizations listed here.

Amend specification paragraphs S.3. SENSITIVENESS and S.4.

GALLONAGE CHART, and TABLE 1 of tolerance paragraph T.2.

BASIC TOLERANCE VALUES, to read as follows:

5.3. SENSITIVENESS.—The value of a graduated interval on a gage rod

or surface gage (exclusive of the interval from the bottom of the tank to the

lowest graduation) shall not exceed (a) % gallon for a tank having a nominal capacity of 250 gallons or less, (b) 1 gallon for a tank of a nominal capacity of 251 to 500 gallons, inclusive, and (c) 2 gallons for a tank of a nominal

capacity of more than 500 gallons.

5.4. GALLONAGE CHART.—A gallonage chart shall show gallonage values

only, and shall show such values at least to the nearest % gallon for a tank

of a nominal capacity of 250 gallons or less, at least to the nearest % gallon

for a tank of a nominal capacity of 251 to 500 gallons, inclusive, and at least

to the nearest 1 gallon for a tank of a nominal capacity of more than 500

gallons. All letters and figures on the chart shall be distinct and easily readable, the chart shall be substantially constructed, and the face of the chart

shall be so protected that its lettering and figures will not tend easily to be- come obliterated or illegible.

Table 1. Basic maintenance and acceptance tolerances, on underregistration and on

overregistration for farm milk tanks

Indicated gallonage Tolerance

250 or less 251 to 500, inclusive

501 to 1,000, inclusive-.

1,001 to 1,500, inclusive

1,501 to 2,000, inclusive

Over 2,000

Gallons

1/2

12

34

5

(The amendments to the Farm Milk Tank Code were adopted by voice vote.)

PAINT CONTAINERS

From the Southern Weights and Measures Association has come

the recommendation "That a standard fill-point be established for

paint in containers for nominal sizes of the gallon and binary submultiples thereof, and providing for reasonable expansion space in

same." With respect to this recommendation, the committee points

out that the containers used in the paint industry are not "measure

containers" but are merely carrying containers similar to paper

cartons for milk, cans for vegetables, and wrappers for prepackaged

meat products. Paint in containers must be considered as packages

and thus are subject to the provisions of the Model Law that relate

to packages and to the Model Package Regulations. Since paint

152
containers are not measure containers, the}' do not come within the

jurisdiction of the Specifications and Tolerances Committee. Accordingly, the committee recommends no action.

(This item was adopted by voice vote.)

The Specifications and Tolerances Committee desires to record

formally its appreciation to all who have participated in its deliberations, either in writing or in person during the interim meeting.

The committee can fulfill its responsibility only with full cooperation from weights and measures officials and business and commercial interests.

C. L. Jackson, Chairman

A. H. DlTTRICH

T. C. Harris, Jr.

R. W. Searles

D. M. Turnbull

W. S. Bussey, Secretary

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor, the Conference by voice vote authorized the National Bureau of Standards to make

any appropriate editorial changes in the language adopted by the Conference,

so long as the principles thus adopted are strictly adhered to.)

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor, the Conference by voice vote adopted the report of the Committee on Specifications

and Tolerances, comprising the tentative report as amended by the final re- port and as amended from the floor.)

FIFTH SESSION—MORNING OF FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 1961

(R. E. Meek, Chairman, Presiding.)

REPORT OF THE AUDITING COMMITTEE

Presented by C. W. Van Schoik, Chairman, Chief, Division of

Weights and Measures, Department of Agriculture, State of Ohio

On behalf of the Auditing Committee, I deem it a pleasure to

report evidence of a job well done. I want to commend the Treasurer for the condition of his books and the ease with which they

were audited. So in behalf of the Auditing Committee, I move that

the report of the Auditing Committee be accepted.

C. W. Van Schoik, Chairman

W. E. Czaia

W. I. Thompson

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor,

the report of the Auditing Committee was adopted by the Conference.)

153
REPORT OF THE TREASURER

Presented by C. C. Morgan, Treasurer, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Gary, Indiana

Balance on hand June 1, 1960 $2, 639. 35 > Receipts:

Registration fees— 1960 Conference, 313 at $10 $3, 130. 00

Bank interest accrued 105. 44

Miscellaneous 23. 47

3, 258. 91

Subtotal $3, 258. 91

Total - $5, 898. 26

Disbursements:

Expenses of 45th National Conference:

Hotel expenses for Conference party (Sheraton

Hall, reception and dance, refreshments,

and waiters) and other miscellaneous

hotel and Conference expenses 1, 116. 21

Music (Sabin Productions) for Conference

party 160. 00

Ladies' entertainment:

Blair Mansion 162.50

Ladies' Fashion Show, Phyllis Boddies 50. 00

AB&W Transit Co 160. 20

Bus transportation of delegates to Department of Commerce 160. 00

Other Conference expenses:

Flowers, Sheraton-Park Hotel 15. 24

C. & P. Telephone Company 12. 95

Expenses of Conference subsequent to June 10,

1960:

National Weights and Measures Week:

G. W. Allen Co. for letterheads 32. 59

American Electrotype Co. for mats 76. 50

C. H. Stender 52. 30

J. E. Bowen, postage 3. 45

Travel expenses for interim meetings:

Committee on Laws and Regulations 754. 10

Committee on Specifications and Tol- erances 978. 07

Attendance Certificates, R. D. Ewin 13. 60

Flowers:

Blackistone, Inc., for Mr. A. J. Mayer 9. 72

Sheraton-East Hotel, for Mr. and Mrs.

J. R. Roberts 10. 30

Postage stamps:

R. E. Meek, Chairman, 46th Confer- ence 4. 00

W. S. Bussey, Secretary 6. 00

Bank charges 5. 40

Subtotal $3, 783. 13

3, 783. 13

Total balance on hand June 1, 1961 $2, 115. 13

Depository:

Gary Trust and Savings Bank, Gary, Indiana.

First Federal Savings and Loan Association, Gary, Indiana.

(Signed) C. C. Morgan,

Treasurer (On motion of the Treasurer, seconded from the floor, the report of the Treasurer was adopted by the Conference.)

154
KEPOKT OF THF INCOMING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

On Friday morning, June 16, the newly elected Executive Committee, the chairmen of the standing committees, and the weights and

measures members of the Advisory Committee were invited to meet

to study and reach decisions regarding the 47th Conference. The

meeting was presided over by the newly elected Conference Chairman, Robert Williams of Nassau County, New York. The following decisions were reached regarding the 47th National Conference

on Weights and Measures, 1962:

1. Place: Sheraton-Park Hotel, Washington, D.C.

l'. Date: June 4r-8, 1962.

3. Duration: Open committee meetings on Monday all day and on Tuesday morning. Opening session Tuesday afternoon. Wednesday afternoon

free of any scheduled business sessions. Business sessions Thursday and

Friday according to program plans.

4. Official Conference Luncheon: To be held again in 1962.

5. Ladies' Entertainment: Left to the discretion of the Executive Secre- tary and the Ladies' Committee.

6. (Mr. Robert Williams of Nassau County, New York, the newly elected

Conference Chairman, reported as follows:)

Among the decisions made was one to record for action next year

a proposed amendment to the Conference Organization and Procedure. This amendment is designed to include in the membership

of the Executive Committee in a nonvoting status all past chairmen

who are still active as regulatory weights and measures officials.

Accordingly, Mr. Chairman, I wish to place on the record the following proposed amendment to Section 5 of the Organization and

Procedure, which is entitled Committees:

In line 6 of the first paragraph, following the comma, amend to read

"and an Executive Committee consisting of all the officers, ex officio, past

chairmen of the Conference still active as regulatory weights and measures

officials, and ten members elected from the active membership. Provided, That

the Executive Secretary and the past chairmen shall not have votes on matters before the Executive Committee."

This is for a matter of recording this year to be voted on next year.

REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON LAWS AND REGULATIONS

Presented by Robert Williams, Chairman, County Sealer of

Weights and Measures, Nassau \County, New York

The Committee on Laws and Regulations of the 46th National

Conference on Weights and Measures submits its report—a tentative

report as amended by the final report. The committee is grateful

for the many constructive suggestions received by mail, during its

interim meeting in February and during its open meeting on Monday, June 12. [The report as presented here comprises the two

reports, tentative and final, combined.]

1 . National Pattern (type) Approval

Prior to the 45th National Conference on Weights and Measures,

the Southern Weights and Measures Association referred to the committee for study the subject of national pattern approval of commercial weighing and measuring devices. This being a broad and

definitely an important topic, the committee continued it on its

613254—61 11 155
agenda for further study. The committee proposed to direct its study along two basic lines: (1) the development of suitable Federal

legislation to establish a national system of pattern approval applicable throughout the country and (2) the extension of the plan

of State pattern approval to all States not presently having adequate legislation for this purpose. The committee has pursued this

study.

During the discussion of this topic on the floor of the 45th National Conference, a rather fundamental question was raised by a representative of the Gasoline Pump Manufacturers Association

That question was: "Is type [pattern] approval itself a good thing?"

In order that the committee might haA^e the benefit of the thinking

of competent weights and measures officials in this regard, the committee chairman, under date of October 5, 1960, directed the following questions to more than 125 State, county, and city weights and

measures officials located in all 50 States, the District of Columbia,

and Puerto Eico.

In your opinion, is State or National type [pattern] approval prior to sale of commercial weighing and measuring devices advisable? In your opinion, would State or National type [pattern] approval facili- tate your enforcement program?

Out of 58 replies to these two questions, 57 replies to both questions

were in the affirmative. Only one official who responded expressed

the opinion that neither State nor National pattern approval was

advisable and that it would not facilitate his enforcement program.

The following question was also asked in the letter of October 5

Which, in your opinion, would be most effective and appropriate, State

or National type [pattern] approval?

Twenty-eight State officials replied to this question, 22 of whom

expressed a preference for National pattern approval, and 6 favored

State pattern approval. Of the 6 favoring State pattern approval,

4 presently have State laws or regulations providing for State pattern approval in their jurisdictions.

Twenty-eight local officials from 12 different States answered this

question. Eleven officials from 8 different States expressed a prefer- ence in favor of National pattern approval. Sixteen officials from

6 States expressed a preference for State pattern approval. One

official favored both National and State pattern approval. Three

of the 6 States represented in this group have laws or regulations

providing for State pattern approval, and 11 of the 16 replies came

from these 3 States.

The committee is convinced that it is the overwhelming consensus

of the weights and measures officials throughout the United States

that pattern approval is "a good thing'" and that it does facilitate

the implementation of an enforcement program. This same opinion

also exists in most other countries of the world supporting comprehensive weights and measures enforcement programs, according

to available information. Based on this conclusion, the principal

question left unanswered is: Which is the more desirable, (1) National or (2) State pattern approval? From the expression of a

sizable majority of the weights and measures officials responding to

the committee's letter, National pattern approval would be preferred.

During the interim meeting of the committee in January, rather

156
strong and forceful opposition to both State and National pattern

approval was offered by the Scale Manufacturers Association.

Although the official position of the Gasoline Pump Manufacturers

Association was not identical with that of the Scale Manufacturers

Association, the Gasoline Pump Manufacturers Association did not

indicate any favor for National pattern approval. The committee

is convinced that it can be safety assumed that a large majority of

the manufacturers of weighing and measuring devices are opposed

to National pattern approval.

Based on its study, including the open discussions at its interim

meeting in January, the committee would summarize as follows:

(a) Pattern approval of commercial weighing and measuring devices prior

to sale is desirable and is beneficial to a weights and measures enforcement

pi-ograrn.

(b) Nearly all weights and measures officials in the United States favor some form of pattern approval.

(c) A sizable majority of weights and measures officials in the United

States (State, county, and city) consider National pattern approval to be preferable to State pattern approval.

(d) A sizable majority of representatives of manufacturers of commercial

weighing and measuring devices oppose National pattern approval, and the

Scale Manufacturers Association has also gone on record as opposing State

pattern approval.

(e) Eepresentatives of users of commercial weighing and measuring de- vices and representatives of consumer groups have not been contacted by the

committee.

(f) Some form of "central" pattern approval wherein the technical ex- aminations would be performed in a properly equipped laboratory by qualified

and unbiased technicians, either governmental or private, at the specific re- quest of State officials under State law, and not under a mandatory Federal

law, would appear to be less objectionable to manufacturers' representatives

than would outright National pattern approval.

(g) It is generally conceded that no State now exercising pattern ap- proval has adequate laboratory and shop facilities and sufficient technically

trained personnel to carry on a State pattern approval program properly and

effectively.

(h) Numerous instances are known where State pattern approval has

been granted even though the device failed to comply with all requirements

of the H44 codes and with the regulations officially and legally adopted by

the State.

(i) It is conceded that the Model State Law on Weights and Measures

in its present form, and most State laws now in effect, provide ample authority to a State to establish State pattern approval and that no further amendments are necessary to provide such authority.

(j) If all 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico were to individually establish their own pattern approval operations, the resulting

situation would be most unsatisfactory.

(k) The committee is convinced that some form of central pattern ap- proval is not only desirable, but greatly needed.

(1) The committee does not feel that there is sufficient knowledge of and

interest in this subject, at the present time, on the part of weights and measures officials, manufacturers' representatives, device users, and the general

public to assure the success of Federal legislation establishing mandatory

National pattern approval.

(m) The committee does feel that this subject is of such importance to the future of weights and measures administration in this country that weights

and measures officials and others shoidd continue to give it their attention

and study, and should continue to discuss and explain its merits to all per- sons having an interest in efficient and effective weights and measures administration. The committee concludes that, if at any future time a person or group of persons feels that the National Confer^ .ce should give

further formal attention to and study of the problem, such fact

157
should be brought to the attention of the officers and appropriate

committee or committees of the Conference. In the meantime, if any

State is interested in establishing pattern approval at the State

level, this should be undertaken by the adoption of a proper State

regulation, or by legislative action if the latter is deemed necessary.

With the adoption of this report by the Conference, the committee

proposes to remove this subject from its agenda.

Mr. Stender: The principles of type approval have been on our program for the last two years because of action in the Southern

Association back in 1959. I had the privilege of delivering a paper

on this subject last year. I have had nothing presented to me in

either written form or letter form, nor have I heard any statement

that has been made that makes me feel that national type approval

should be placed away in the files forever. With all the equipment

that we are getting today, we are doing too much testing in the

field, testing that the consumer pays for. I hope that the National

Conference will give this matter further study, and I firmly believe

that national type approval would prove to be an advantage to

industry instead of the detriment it now thinks it would be.

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor, item 1 was adopted by the Conference by voice vote)

2. Methods of Sale of Commodities

The committee has studied various ways and means of effectuating

its recommendations as adopted by the Conference in the area of

methods of sale of commodities. Over a considerable number of

years, the Conference has adopted stipulations and recommendations

as to how individual commodities should be sold. Certain of these

recommendations have conflicted with others, and some definitely

cannot be harmonized with the most recent Model Law and Model

Package Regulation.

It now appears to the committee that its mission in this particular area should not be one of bringing forth firm recommendations,

but rather should be one of determining whether a merchandising

situation is of special character and, if so, developing either a Model

Law amendment, a Model Regulation amendment, a special law or

regulation, or an official interpretation of existing law or regulation.

The committee has reviewed the multitude of recommendations

as to methods of sale that have been adopted by the Conference in

the past and is of the opinion that, with few exceptions, all commodities previously acted upon are either appropriately covered

in current Model Laws and Regulations or the recommendations are

obsolete. Accordingly, the committee recommends that all previous

actions be rescinded and offers for Conference consideration the

items in this report.

In the future, the committee will analyze particular commodities

brought to its attention to determine the advisability of Conference

action. It appears that, if the past is typical, many requests for

interpretation are local in character or are clearly covered in the

Model Law or Regulation. These will be answered by direct

correspondence.

Commodities that, because of their very special character, are deemed of sufficient importance for Conference action will be studied

very carefully prior to any recommendation to the Conference.

158
The committee recommends the adoption of the following two

regulations as models for State action.

MODEL REGULATION FOR PAPER PRODUCTS

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as sot forth in section (Sections 9

and 25 of the Model Law) of chapter of the

statutes of the State of [cite sections authorizing pro- mulgation of general regulation and special commodity sections], I,

, State Director of Weights and Measures, hereby adopt

and promulgate the following regulation:

1. Paper Napkins and Paper Towels.—The declaration of quantity on a package of paper napkins or paper towels shall indicate the numerical count

and the dimensions of the individual napkins or towels contained in the package.

2. Writing Paper, Notebook Paper, Envelopes.—The declaration of quantity on a package of writing paper, notebook paper, or envelopes shall indi- cate the number of sheets or envelopes, as the case may be, in the package.

When envelopes are included in a package of writing paper, the declaration

shall indicate both the number of sheets of paper and the number of envelopes.

3. Tablets and Books of Writing Paper.—The declaration of quantity on

a package of tablets or books of writing paper shall indicate the number of

tablets or books in the package.

4. Wrapping Paper.—The declaration of quantity on a package of wrapping paper in sheet form may be in terms of either numerical count or of net weight. If the declaration is in terms of numerical count, it shall indicate

both the dimensions of an individual sheet and the number of sheets in the

package.

5. Facial Tissues.—The declaration of quantity on a package of facial

tissues shall indicate the numerical count of usable units (a sheet of two or

three ply shall be considered a single usable unit) and the dimensions of the

individual unit.

6. Toilet Tissues.—The declaration of quantity on a package of toilet tis- sues in roll or sheet form shall indicate the numerical count of usable units

(a sheet of two or three ply shall be considered a single usable unit) and the

dimensions of the individual unit.

7. Supplementary Quantity Declarations.—Any declaration or statement

relating to the quantity of contents of a package of paper product that is in addition to or supplementary to the declaration required by law or regulation shall be in juxtaposition with and shall be subordinated to the required

declaration.

8. Exemption.—Rolls or packages of paper products for industrial use only

and not for resale need not be marked individually so long as the container

in which such rolls or packages are packed is properly marked to show the

quantity of the contents of such container.

9. This regulation is additive to valid laws and other regulations per- taining to packages and shall not be construed as superseding any such law

or regulation.

MODEL REGULATION FOR ROOFING AND ROOFING MATERIALS

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as set forth in section ( Sections 9

and 25 of the Model Law) of chapter of the

statutes of the State of [cite sections authorizing pro- mulgation of general regulation and special commodity sections], I,

, State Director of Weights and Measures, hereby adopt

and promulgate the following regulation : 1. Roofing and roofing materials shall be sold either by the "square" or by the "square foot." The term "square" shall mean the quantity of roofing

or roofing material that, when applied according to directions or instructions

of the manufacturer, will cover an area of 100 square feet exclusive of side

laps or side joints : Provided, That, in the case of roofing or roofing material

of corrugated design, the side lap or side joint shall be one full corrugation.

The term "square foot" shall mean the quantity of roofing or roofing

material that, when applied according to the directions or instructions of the

159
manufacturer, will cover 1 square foot (144 square inches) exclusive of side

laps or side joints.

2. This regulation is additive to valid laws and N other regulations per- taining to packages and shall uot be construed as superseding any such law

or regulation.

( Item 2 was adopted by voice vote.

)

3. Standardization of Package Sizes

At the suggestion of the Conference Chairman, the committee

has been giving attention to the important matter of standardization

of package sizes. This is an area that has received the attention of

the National Conference in the past and that presently is of serious concern to consumer organizations. There are a number of commodities that presently are offered in more or less standard size

consumer packages (flour, butter, paint, distilled spirits, for example), but there are literally thousands of commodities packed in

many and odd sizes.

The control of package sizes, through either voluntary agreement

or legislative action, is a very large undertaking, but its importance

seems great enough to warrant Conference action at this time—at least with the beginning of what surely will be a long term project.

Accordingly, a subcommittee of the Committee on Laws and Regulations has been established as follows: Harry M. Turrell, Director,

Pennsylvania Bureau of Standard Weights and Measures, chairman;

John G. Gustafson, Chief Inspector, Minneapolis Department of

Licenses, Weights, and Measures; and George L. Johnson, Director,

Kentucky Division of Weights and Measures.

This entire matter should become a major topic of discussion

among weights and measures officials, packers, wholesalers, retailers,

and consumers. The subcommittee solicits comments and suggestions. Correspondence should be directed to the Conference Secretary, who will serve as secretary to the subcommittee.

(Item 3 was adopted by voice vote.)

I. Model State Lata

Representatives of the Tissue Association, Inc., made a written

request to the committee, which was supported by oral testimony at the committee's interim meeting, that the committee consider a proposed amendment to Section 29 of the Model Law. The reason given for the proposed amendment was that members of the Tissue

Association believed the present Avording of Section 29 of the

Model Law could and possibly would be interpreted to require an

exact duplication of the quantity statement on the label in the

advertisement. It was the feeling of the committee that such exact

duplication was not intended. Therefore, the committee was impressed with the merits of the suggestion and now recommends for

consideration and adoption the following: That Section 29 of the

Model Law be amended to read as follows:

SEC. 29. SAME: ADVERTISING PACKAGES FOR SALE—Whenever

a commodity in package form is advertised in any manner and the retail price

of the package is stated in the advertisement, there shall be closely and con- spicuously associated with such statement of price a declaration of the basic

quantity of contents of the package as is required by law or regulation to appear on the package.

(Item 4 was adopted by voice vote.)

160
5. Model State Regulation Pertain I in/ to Packages

5.1. Promim nee and Placemen!—Representatives of the Tissue

Association, Inc., made a similar request for an amendment of Section

6 of the Model State Regulation Pertaining to Packages. It was

submitted that the present wording of this section could logically be

construed to require a quantity statement on as many as five panels

of cartons containing certain paper products. Similar situations

would be encountered in other commodities. Being impressed with

the merits of this suggestion, the committee offers for consideration

and adoption the following: Amend Section G of the Model State

Regulation Pertaining to Packages to read as foflows:

6. PROMINENCE AND PLACEMENT.—All information required to appear

on a package shall be prominent, definite, and plain, and shall be conspicuous

as to size and style of letters and numbers and as to color of letters and

numbers in contrast to color of background. Such information shall appear

on the principal display panel of the package. Any required information that

is either in hand lettering or hand script shall be entirely clear and equal to printing in legibility.

5.2. Aerosol Containers—At the time the committee made its final

report to the 45th National Conference on Weights and Measures,

Mr. H. E. Peterson, President, Peterson Filling and Packing Company, Danville, Illinois, representing the Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Association, had not delivered his very comprehensive paper

on this subject. Therefore, no final recommendation was made by the

committee in this area. During the months which have ensued, the

committee members and personnel of the National Bureau of Standards have continued to study this problem, giving particular attention

to Mr. Peterson's paper.

The conclusion reached from Mr. Peterson's paper is that all commodities packaged in aerosol containers should be labeled and sold

by net weight. Mr. Peterson explained why sale by weight is con- sidered to be the only known method that is practical and can be

used successfully in both the filling of the containers by the packer

and the checking of the quantity of contents by the weights and

measures official. It is readily acknowledged that this will mean, in

many instances, that a specific product will be sold by "weight" in an aerosol container and universally sold by "liquid measure" in

conventional containers. (A specific example is paint.)

While the committee does not particularly like the idea of a given

commodity being sold by liquid measure in one type of container

and by weight in another type container, the committee does feel

that the Conference must be both realistic and objective in its approach to any problem. In this particular instance, it is the opinion

of the committee that sale by weight is the only practical method that can be utilized for products in aerosol containers. It is, therefore,

the recommendation of the committee that all commodities packaged

in aerosol containers should be sold by weight and that the net quantity of contents, including the propellant, be so labeled on the package. The test of the accuracy of the quantity declaration is accomplished in four steps: (1) Establish the gross weight of the package.

(2) Expel the entire contents of the package with the propellant,

following the instructions furnished by the packer. (3) Determine

the tare weight, of the container. (4) Subtract the tare weight from

the gross weight to determine the net weight of the contents.

161
Iii order to make the Model State Regulation Pertaining to Packages perfectly clear in relation to aerosol containers, the committed

recommends that Section 3.2. of this regulation be amended by inserting in line 12, after the comma following the word "That" : "if

the commodity is packaged in an aerosol container, the declaration

shall be in terms of weight (including the propellant) : And provided further That,". This will make the section read as follows

3.2. TERMS—WEIGHT, MEASURE, OR COUNT.—The declaration of the

quantity of a particular commodity shall be expressed in such terms of weight,

measure, or count, or a combination of count and weight, measure, or size, as have been firmly established in general consumer usage and trade custom and

as give accurate information as to the quantity of the commodity. But if there

exists no firmly established general consumer usage and trade custom with re- spect to the terms used in expressing such declaration of quantity, the declaration shall be in terms of liquid measure if the commodity is liquid, or in terms

of weight if the commodity is solid, semisolid, viscous, or a mixture of solid and

liquid : Provided, That, if the commodity is packaged in an aerosol container, the

declaration shall be in terms of weight (including the propellant) : And provided

further That, if the commodity is a textile material, the declaration shall be in terms of linear measure unless the material is one in which there exists a firmly

established general consumer usage and trade custom to declare the quantity in terms of weight, in which case the declaration may be in terms of weight.

(Item 5 was adopted by voice vote.)

The committee is appreciative of the assistance rendered to it in

its deliberations by all those who have made oral or written comment on any of the natters on the committee agenda, and records its

thanks to weights and measures officials, representatives of equipment manufacturers, and others for this cooperation.

Robert Williams, Chairman

J. G. Gustafson

G. L. Johnson

J. H. Lewis

H. M. Turrell

W. S. Bussey, Secretary

(On motion of the committee chairman, seconded from the floor, the report of the

Conference Committee on Laws and Regulations was adopted by voice vote.)

(The benediction was delivered by Mr. John H. Lewis of the State of Washington. Thereupon at 10:45 a.m. the 46th National Conference on Weights and

Measures adjourned tine die.)

162
PERSONS ATTENDING THE CONFERENCE

Delegates—Slate, City, and County Officials

ARIZONA

State C. 0. Smith, Deputy Inspector, State Department of Weights and Measures, Room 139

Capitol Bldg., Phoenix.

CALIFORNIA

State W. A. Kerlin, Chief, Bureau of Weights and

Measures, Department of Agriculture, 1220

"N" St., Sacramento.

Mrs. H. E. Nelson, Consumer Counsel, Governor's Office, State Capitol, Sacramento.

County:

Alameda R. H. Fernsten, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 333 Fifth Street, Oakland.

Kern A. D. Rose, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 1116 E. California Avenue, Bakersfield. Los Angeles F. M. Raymund, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 3200 N. Main Street, Los Angeles.

San Diego H. J. McDade, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 1480 "F" St., San Diego.

Santa Clara D. R. Pratt, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 142 N. Market St., San Jose. Ventura E. H. Black, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, P.O. Box 1610, Ventura.

COLORADO

State H. N. Duff, State Supervisor, Weights and

Measures Section, Department of Agriculture,

State Services Bldg., 1525 Sherman St., Denver.

H. H. Houston, Director, Oil Inspection Department, 1024 Speer Bldv., Denver.

CONNECTICUT

State F. M. Greene, Chief, Division of Weights and

Measures, Department of Consumer Protection, State Office Building, Hartford.

pty:

Hartford Nathan Kalechman, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

Middletown Peter Grassi, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Post Office Box 223.

New Britain A. J. Albanese, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Weights, Measures, and Markets Branch, Department of Licenses and Inspection,

Room 227 Esso Bldg., 261 Constitution Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C.

District J. T. Kennedy, Chief.

J. M. Boucher, Supervisor.

J. T. Bennick, Inspector and Investigator.

R. E. Bradley, Inspector and Investigator.

W. R. Cornelius, Inspector and Investigator.

D. K. Forbes, Inspector and Investigator.

Kenneth Hayden, Inspector and Investigator.

H. P. Hutchinson, Inspector and Investigator.

W. H. Jennings, Inspector and Investigator.

G. P. Kosmos, Inspector and Investigator.

I. L. Wagner, Jr., Inspector and Investigator.

W. W. Wells, Inspector and Investigator.

613254—61 12 163
FLORIDA

State Nalls Berryman, Director, Division of Standards, Department of Agriculture, Room 107

Nathan Mayo Bldg., Tallahassee.

Nat Mayo, Director, Inspection Division.

W. R. Dixon, Field Supervisor.

City:

Jacksonville H. E. Crawford, Inspector, Department of Weights and Measures, Room 203 City Hall.

Miami H. E. Howard, Supervisor, Division of Trade

Standards, Coconut Grove Station, P.O. Box

708.

GEORGIA

State P. I. Morris, Jr., Director, Weights and Measures Division, Department of Agriculture, 19

Hunter St., S.W., Atlanta.

J. W. D. Harvey, State Oil Chemist, State Oil

Laboratory, Department of Revenue, 264

Capitol PL, Atlanta.

ILLINOIS

State H. L. Goforth, Superintendent, Division of

Feeds, Fertilizers, and Standards, State Fairgrounds, 531 E. Sangamon Avenue, Springfield.

City:

Chicago R. J. Fahy, Chief Deputy Inspector, Department

of Weights and Measures, Room 302 Central

Office Building, 320 N. Clark St. Robert Scanlon, Supervising Deputy Inspector.

INDIANA

State R. E. Meek, Director, Division of Weights and

Measures, State Board of Health, 1330 W.

Michigan St., Indianapolis.

County:

Gibson W. R. Sevier, County Inspector of Weights and

Measures, 112 E. Emerson St., Princeton.

Grant R. C. Parks, County Inspector of Weights and

Measures, Court House, Marion.

Howard . L R. Frazer, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 113 N. Washington St., Kokomo.

Knox W. D. Liddil, County Inspector of Weights and

Measures, 840 State St., Vincennes.

St. Joseph S. C. Grzeskowiak, County Inspector, Division

of Weights and Measures, Room 11 Court

House, South Bend.

Vigo R. J. Silcock, County Inspector of Weights and

Measures, Room 5 Court House, Terre Haute.

City:

Evansville J. M. Brite, City Inspector of Weights and

Measures, 10 S. Lafayette St. Gary C. C. Morgan, City Sealer of Weights and Measures, City Hall.

Indianapolis W. R. Copeland, Supervising Inspector, Department of Weights and Measures, 202 N. Alabama St. New Albany M. A. Steinert, City Inspector of Weights and

Measures, 37 W. Fifth St. South Bend B. S. Cichowicz, City Inspector of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

KANSAS

State J. F. True, State Sealer, Division of Weights and

Measures, State Board of Agriculture, State

Office Building, Topeka.

J. L. O'Neill, State Inspector, Division of

Weights and Measures, Williamsburg.

1G4
J. O. Slaughter, .Jr., City Inspector of Weights

and Measures, Department of Finance and

Revenue, City Hall.

KENTUCKY

G. L. Johnson, Director, Division of Weights and

Measures, Department of Agriculture, Capitol

Annex, Frankfort.

J. A. Haley, State Inspector, 1829 James David

Ct., Owensboro.

LOUISIANA

F. F. Thompson, Chief Chemist, P.O. Box 8374

University Station, Baton Rouge.

MAINE

H. D. Robinson, Deputy Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Department of Agriculture, State

House, Augusta.

C. J. Wills, Jr., City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Room 16, 389 Congress Street. MARYLAND

P. E. Nystrom, Director, Agriculture Extension

Service, State Board of Agriculture, University

of Maryland, College Park.

J. E. Mahoney, State Superintendent of Weights

and Measures, Department of Markets, State

Board of Agriculture, University of Maryland,

College Park.

R. N. Smith, Assistant Superintendent.

Lacy DeGrange, State Inspector. R. W. Glendenning, State Inspector, Post

Office Box 356, Chestertown.

E. W. Bucklin, Director, Department of In- spections and Licenses, County Office Building,

Rockville.

L. B. Morton, County Inspector of Weights and

Measures.

J. P. Soltysiak, County Inspector of Weights

and Measures.

R. J. Cord, Chief Inspector of Weights and

Measures, Court House, Upper Marlboro.

G. H. Leithauser, Chief Inspector, Division of

Weights and Measures, Room 1106 Municipal

Building.

MASSACHUSETTS

W. C. Hughes, Head Administrative Assistant,

Division of Standards and Necessaries of Life,

Department of Labor and Industries, State

House, Boston.

A. E. Jenest, State Inspector, 210 Elm St. Greenfield.

J. F. McCarthy, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Room 105 City Hall Annex.

N. A. Sacknoff, Deputy Sealer of Weights and

Measures, c/o Health Department, 11 Prospect

St., Town Hall. A. T. Anderson, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Room 202 City Hall.

L. L. Elliott, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 48 E. Elm St.

it;:.
Fitchburg W. T. Deloge, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall, 42 Elm St. Newton J. E. Bowen, City Sealer of Weights and Measures, City Hall, Newton Centre.

Quincy H. H. Hughes, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall Annex, 63 Saville Row.

Somerville J. F. Casey, City Sealer of Weights and Measures, Public Works Building.

MICHIGAN

State J. L. Littlefield, Chief, Foods and Standards

Division, Department of Agriculture, Lewis

Cass Building, Lansing.

Robert Blackburn, State Sealer of Weights and

Measures (Michigan Association of Weights

and Measures Officials), 4152 Omaha, Grandville. County:

Washtenaw G. P. Smith, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, County Building, Ann Arbor.

City:

Dearborn J. A. Hughes, Superintendent, Department of

Licenses, Weights, and Measures, 13030 Hemlock Ave.

Detroit J. T. Daniell, Deputy Sealer, Bureau of Weights

and Measures, 2693 Eighteenth St. Royal Oak G. E. Rutledge, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures (Michigan Association of Weights

and Measures Officials), 211 William St. MINNESOTA

State W. E. Czaia, Supervisor, Department of Weights

and Measures, Railroad and Warehouse Commission, One Flour Exchange, Minneapolis.

0. K. Warnlof, State Inspector, 325 S. Third St., Minneapolis.

City:

Minneapolis J. G. Gustafson, Chief Inspector, Department of

Licenses, Weights, and Measures, Room 101-A

City Hall.

W. K. Leonard, Inspector.

MISSOURI

State G.W. Bay, Chief Inspector, Weights and Measures

Division, Department of Agriculture, Jefferson

City.

City

St. Louis J. A. Bernard, Commissioner of Weights and

Measures, Room 12 City Hall.

NEVADA

State Raymond Rebuffo, Assistant Director, Division

of Plant Industry, Department of Agriculture,

350 Capitol Hill Avenue, P.O. Box 1209, Reno.

NEW HAMPSHIRE

State A. H. Dittrich, Chief Inspector, Bureau of Weights and Measures, Division of Markets and

Standards, Department of Agriculture, State

Office Building, Concord.

A. R. Roy, State Inspector, 16 Monroe St., Concord.

Frederick Young, State Inspector, 204 Gilford

St., Manchester.

City:

Manchester F. A. Genest, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 180 Franklin St.

166
NEW JERSEY

State W. H. Cramer, State Superintendent, Division

of Weights and Measures, Department of Law

and Public Safety, 187 W.Hanover St., Trenton.

S. H. Christie, Jr., Deputy State Superintendent. R. K. Bodenwieser, Supervisor of Enforcement.

A. T. Smith, Supervisor of Technical Services.

J. R. Bird, Senior Technician.

County

Atlantic J. E. Myers, County Superintendent of Weights

and Measures, 350 S. Egg Harbor Rd.,

Hammonton.

Bergen M. J. Santimauro, County Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, 66 Zabriskie St., Hackensack.

E. E. Dawson, Assistant County Superintendent.

Burlington D. F. Hummel, Superintendent of Weights and

Measures, Countv Office Building, 49 Water

St., Mt. Holly.

Camden A. C. Becker, County Superintendent of Weights

and Measures, City Hall, Camden.

Cumberland G. S. Franks, County Superintendent of Weights

and Measures, County Court House, Bridgeton. Essex W. H. Schneidewind, County Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, 278 New St., Newark.

Mercer R. M. Bodenweiser, County Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, Court House, Trenton.

Monmouth W. I. Thompson, County Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, P. 0. Box 74, Allenhurst.

J. A. J. Bovie, Assistant County Superintendent.

W. G. Dox, Assistant County Superintendent,

12 Campview PI., Keansburg.

J. J. Elker, Inspector, 1219 First Ave., Asbury

Park.

Passaic William Miller, County Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, 317 Pennsylvania Ave., Paterson. Warren G. E. Connolly, County Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, Court House, Belvidere. City:

Bayonne J. G. Vayda, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, Municipal Building,

26th St. and Ave. C. Camden Alfred DiPiero, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, City Hall.

Fair Lawn Oscar Haug, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, Plaza Building.

Garfield Charles Benanti, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, 147 Frederick St. Jersey City H. J. Myers, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, City Hall.

Kearny James Pollock, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, Town Hall, 402

Kearny Ave.

Linden L. T. Reagan, Municipal Superintendent of Weights and Measures, Room 206, City Hall.

Nutley Roy Gundersdorff, Director, Public Affairs

Department.

W. L. Callanan, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, Town Hall, Chestnut

St.

167
Passaic Paul DeVries, Municipal Superintendent of Weights and Measures, City Hall.

Joseph Shaw, Assistant Municipal Superintendent.

Paterson J. P. Leonard, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, 115 Van Houten St. W. J. Kehoe, Jr., Assistant Municipal Superintendent.

Trenton R. J. Boney, Municipal Superintendent of

Weights and Measures, 324 East State, City

Hall Annex.

Union City A. O. Oslund, Municipal Superintendent of Weights and Measures, City Hall, 3715

Palisade Avenue.

NEW MEXICO

State C. B. Whigham, Chief, Division of Markets,

Weights and Measures, Department of Agriculture, Box 457, University Park.

NEW YORK

State J. F. Madden, Director, Bureau of Weights

and Measures, Department of Agriculture

and Markets, State Office Building, Albany.

County

Dutchess J. E. Dean, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 47 Fuller Ave., Hyde Park.

Genesee G. A. Pullman, County Sealer of Weights

and Measures, 19 Buffalo St., Bergen.

Monroe E. D. Hubble, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 1400 South Ave., Rochester.

R. J. Veness, Deputy County Sealer. Nassau Robert Williams, County Sealer of Weights

and Measures, 58 Third Ave., Mineola.

A. W. Weidner, Jr., Assistant County Sealer. Wayne H. H. Wright, County Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 30 Catherine St., Lyons.

City:

Binghamton E. N. Volkay, Sealer of Weights and Measures,

54 Hawley St. Glen Cove E. T. Hunter, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

Ithaca E. P. Nedrow, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

Lackawanna J. J. Seres, City Sealer of Weights and Measures,

84 Rosary Ave.

Rochester A. C. Samenfink, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Rochester Public Market.

Svracuse J. M. Byrne, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, 101 Pine St. Yonkers John Dimase, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

NORTH CAROLINA

State C. D. Baucom, Superintendent, Weights and

Measures Division, Department of Agriculture,

Agriculture Building, Raleigh.

J. I. Moore, Field Supervisor.

M. L. Kinlaw, State Inspector, 315 Cross St., Hope Mills.

OHIO

State C. W. Van Schoik, Chief, Division of Weights

and Measures, Department of Agriculture,

Reynoldsburg.

168
County:

Ashland J. H. Nigh, Deputy County Sealer of Weights

and Measures, c/o County Auditor, Ashland.

Chirk D. W. Lawson, Deputy County Sealer of Weights

and Measures, e/o County Auditor, Springfield.

Medina R. W. Searles, Deputy County Sealer of

Weights and Measures, County Board of

Education Building, Medina.

Ottawa Rudolph Starkloff, Deputy County Sealer of

Weights and Measures, Box 208, Port Clinton.

Warren J. D. Templeton, County Auditor, Court

House, Lebanon.

City:

Cincinnati W. E. G. Rhein, Superintendent, Division of

Markets, Weights and Measures, 316

George St. Youngstown F. B. Jones, City Sealer of Weights and Measures, City Hall. OKLAHOMA

State R. W. Powell, Director, Marketing Division,

State Board of Agriculture, 122 Capitol Bldg.,

Oklahoma City.

City:

Oklahoma City W. U. Lindsay, Chief, Inspector, Weights and

Measures, City Hall. Tulsa J. L. Smith, City Inspector of Weights and

Measures, City Hall, Fourth and Cincinnati.

OREGON

State W. B. Steele, Deputy State Sealer of Weights

and Measures, Department of Agriculture,

Agriculture Bldg., Salem.

PENNSYLVANIA

State Miss Genevieve Blatt, Secretary, Department

of Internal Affairs, Capitol Bldg., Harrisburg.

W. C. Seyler, Deputy Secretary.

H. M. Turrell, Director, Bureau of Standard

Weights and Measures.

E. A. Vadelund, Assistant Director. A. A. Florio, State Inspector of Weights and

Measures, 84 Hudson St., Slovan.

Marion Grashion, State Inspector, R.D. #1,

Grindstone.

J. W. Schimmel, State Inspector, Box 17, Analomink.

W. J. Shotwell, State Inspector, 404 East 9th

St., Berwick.

City:

Altoona R. I. CuMMiNns, City Inspector of Weights and

Measures, City Hall. PUERTO RICO

Commonwealth A. E. Diaz, Head, Weights and Measures Division, Economic Stabilization Administration,

P.O. Box 4183, San Juan.

RHODE ISLAND

State E. R. Fisher, State Sealer of Weights and Measures, Department of Labor, Veterans Memorial

Building, 83 Park St., Providence.

City:

Cranston J. J. Adams, City Sealer of Weights and Measures,

89 Bartlett Ave.

Providence William D' Abate, Superintendent of Weights

and Measures, 173 Sisson St.

169
SOUTH CAROLINA

State C. H. Stender, Assistant to Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 1080,

Columbia.

E. W. Ballentine, Supervisor, Weights and

Measures.

TENNESSEE

State Matt Jennings, Director, Division of Marketing, Department of Agriculture, Melrose Station, Box 9039, Nashville.

County:

Davidson County G. R. Langham, County Sealer, 1417 Ordway

PL, Nashville.

TEXAS

State P. H. Koontz, Assistant Commissioner, Department of Agriculture, Capitol Station, Austin.

Bob Boyd, Deputy Commissioner.

City:

Dallas F. G. Yarbeough, Chief Deputy of Weights and

Measures, 303 City Hall.

VIRGINIA

State P. C. Brinkley, Commissioner, Department of

Agriculture and Immigration, 302 Governor

St., Richmond.

T. C. Harris Jr., Supervisor, Weights and

Measures Section, Department of Agriculture

and Immigration, 1200 East Main St., Richmond.

J. F. Lyles, Field Supervisor.

G. P. Latimer, State Inspector, 107 Tazewell

Ave., Cape Charles.

J. W. Rogers, State Inspector, R #1, Box 645,

Suffolk. C. E. Whitman, Field Supervisor, Scale Maintenance, Department of Highways, 1221 E. Broad St., Richmond.

City:

Alexandria . L. W. Vezina, Sealer of Weights and Measures,

405 Cameron St. Danville __ _ C. H. Wrenn, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Curb Market Bldg., Spring St. Norfolk W. F. Bradley, Chief, Bureau of Weights and

Measures, Department of Public Safety, City

Hall. Petersburg _ C. R. Branch, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

Richmond J. G. Williams Jr., Chief, Bureau of Weights

and Measures, Room 112 The Mosque, Laurel

and Main Sts. A. B. Moody Jr., Inspector.

Roanoke J. M. Hudgins, Chief. Department of Weights

and Measures, City Market Bldg.

WASHINGTON

State J. H. Lewis, Chief, Weights and Measures Section, Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box

120, Olvmpia.

City:

Seattle D. M. Turnbull, Director, Division of Licenses

and Standards, Office of the Comptroller, Room

100, County-City Building.

170
WEST VIRGINIA

State Lawrence Barker, Commissioner, Department

of Labor, State Capitol, Charleston.

Matt Johnson, State Inspector, 1786 Arlington

Blvd., Huntington.

WISCONSIN

State C. L. Jackson, Chief, Division of Economic

Practices, Department of Agriculture, State

Capitol, Madison.

T. E. Wildrick, Field Supervisor.

City:

Beloit L. W. Raymond, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Municipal Center.

Green Bay N. P. Tilleman, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall.

Kenosha J. P. Kuchera, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, Room 15, City Hall.

Milwaukee P. J. Dwyer, Deputv City Sealer of Weights

and Measures, 133rNorth 5th St. Racine Robert Zierten, City Sealer of Weights and

Measures, City Hall." West Allis J. J. Persak, Deputy City Sealer of Weights

and Measures, City Hall.

Advisory Members

Jay J. Jacobson, Legislative Assistant to Senator Maurine Neuberger.

U.S. Department of Commerce:

Luther H. Hodges, Secretary of Commerce.

National Bureau of Standards:

Director's Office: A. V. Astin, Director. A. T. McPherson, Associate Director for Engineering.

Office of Weights and Measures:

W. S. Bussey, Chief.

M. W. Jensen, Assistant Chief. L. V. Judson, Physicist.

R. W. Smith, Consultant (Honorary Life Member).

H. F. Wollin, Engineer.

G. H. Borders, Library Assistant.

Mrs. F. C. Bell, Administrative Assistant.

Mrs. E. L. Brueckner, Secretary.

Mrs. M. M. Brodmerkel, Secretary.

Office of Technical Information:

W. R. Tilley, Chief.

J. F. Reilly, Publications Editor, Information Section. C. C. Atwood, Information Officer. Mrs. Claire Patterson, Administrative Assistant.

Metrology Division:

L. B. Macurdy, Chief, Mass Unit, Mass and Scale Section.

H. E. Almer, Physical Science Technician, Mass Unit, Mass and

Scale Section.

H. A. Bowman, Physicist, Mass Unit, Mass and Scale Section.

P. S. Shoenfeld, Physicist, Mass Unit, Mass and Scale Section. A. M. Garfield, Physical Science Aid, Mass Unit, Mass and Scale

Section. E. M. Brody, Student Assistant, Mass Unit, Mass and Scale Section.

H. H. Russell, Chief, Scale Unit, Mass and Scale Section.

H. L. Badger, Physicist, Scale Unit, Mass and Scale Section.

R. W. Crouch, Jr., Technologist, Photometry and Colorimetry

Section.

J. C. Hughes, Acting Chief, Volumetry and Densimetry Section.

Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry Division:

H. S. Peiser, Consultant in Weighing.

171
U.S. Department of Agriculture:

D. R. Stokes, Agricultural Economist, U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Washington, D.C.

D. R. Mackay, Agricultural Engineer, Agricultural Engineering Research

Division, Agricultural Engineering Laboratory, Agricultural Research

Center, Beltsville, Maryland.

Fred Stein, Dairy Marketing Specialist, U.S. Department of Agriculture,

14th and C St., S.W., Washington, D.C.

Milton Johnson, Marketing Specialist, Regulatory Branch Fruit and

Vegetable Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, D.C.

R. D. Thompson, Chief, Scales and Weighing Branch, Packers and Stockyards Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, Washington, D.C.

M. W. Stephens, Scales and Weighing Specialist, 3507 Department of

Agriculture Bldg., Washington, D.C.

J. L. Alcorn, Scales and Weighing Specialist, Room 225 Livestock Exchange

Bldg., Sioux City, Iowa.

H. C. Kennett, Jr., Marketing Specialist, Poultry Division, Agricultural

Marketing Service, Washington, D.C.

Federal Trade Commission:

D. J. Murphy, Assistant Director, Bureau of Litigation, Washington, D.C.

W. B. Snow, Jr., Chief, Division of Stipulations, Federal Trade Commission

Bldg., Washington, D.C.

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare:

G. P. Larrick, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, Washington,

D.C.

L. M. Beacham, Deputy Director, Division of Food, Bureau of Biological

and Physical Sciences, Food and Drug Administration, Washington, D.C.

U.S. Department of the Treasury:

E. W. Teagarden, Engineer, Division of Technical Services, Bureau of

Customs, Washington, D.C.

Associate Members—Manufacturers of Weighing and Measuring Devices

Ace Glass, Inc.: T. A. Lilly, Sales Representative, 43 So. Early St., Alexandria,

Va.

Ainsworth, Wm., & Sons, Inc.: Nicholas Volpe, Eastern District Manager,

3 Lakeview Ave., Boonton, N. J. Badger Meter Manufacturing Co.: M. E. Hartz, Director of Research and

Engineering, 4545 West Brown Deer Rd., Milwaukee, Wis.

Bowser, Inc.: E. J. Reinhart, Manager, Customer Service, 1302 East Creighton Ave., Fort

Wayne, Ind.

W. F. Gerdom, Assistant Manager.

Brodie, Ralph N., Co.:

C. J. McCaffrey, Vice President, 550 South Columbus Ave., Mount Vernon,

N.Y.

D. W. Kinosley, Special Salesman.

H. E. Siebold, Sales Engineer, 3314 Chrysler Building, New York, N.Y.

Cardinal Scale Manufacturing Co.: W. H. Perry, 203 E. Daugherty, Webb

City, Mo.

Chatillon, John, & Sons: G. C. Reiley, Vice President, Sales, 85-93 Cliff St., New York, N.Y.

Continental Can Co., Inc.: T. P. McGlynn, Manager, Product and Market Development, P.O. Box 1159,

349 Oraton Street, Newark, N.J. Seymour Kurtz.

Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.: L. T. Gustafson, General Sales Engineer,

1243 West Washington Blvd., Chicago, 111. Crow Scales, Inc.: C. Crow, President, P.O. Box 3092, Waco, Tex.

Dairy Equipment Co.: K. S. Hart, Vice President, 1444 E. Washington Ave.,

Madison, Wis.

Detecto Scales, Inc.: Mack Rapp, Vice President, 540 Park Ave., Brooklyn, N.Y.

Dixie Cup Division of American Can Co.: J. G. Rogers, Consultant, Weights

and Measures, 4730 Stevens Drive, Sarasota, Fla. Dover Corp. Division of OPW: R. H. Schildman, Manager, Government Sales,

2735 Colerain Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio.

172
Exact Weight Scale Co.: W. A. Scheurer, President, 53S East Town St., Columbus, Ohio.

\V. J. Schieser, Vice President.

Bruce Taylor, General Manager.

Ex-Cell-0 Corp.:

J. F. Flynn, Service Manager, 1200 Oakman Blvd., Detroit, Mich.

Arnold Dorbeck.

Factory Equipment Co.: J. F. Feind, President, 190 State St., Bloomfield, N.J. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.: C. G. Gehringer, Director of Marketing, Scale Division, 19-01 Route 208,

Fair Lawn, N.J. R. E. Hess, Sales Manager, Fairlawn Ind. Park, Fair Lawn, N.J.

J. M. Linnehan, Field Engineer, 659 E. 25th St., Baltimore, Md.

T. S. Peders, Supervisor, Service Department.

Richard Wasniak, National Manager, Service, 600 South Michigan Ave.,

Chicago, 111. Gilbert & Barker Manufacturing Co.: William Keay, Manager, Sales Service, West Springfield, Mass.

F. L. Shephard, Manager, Sales Engineering.

Granberg Corp.: W. M. Milligan, Sales Manager, Eastern Division, 489 5th

Ave., New York, N.Y.

Gurley, W. & L. E.: F. G. Williams, Washington Representative, 5514 Nevada

Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C.

Hobart Manufacturing Co.: K. C. Allen, Vice President, Scale Operations, 448 Huffman Ave., Dayton,

Ohio.

M. E. Bone, Weights and Measures Representative.

E. A. Reussenzehn, Chief Scale Engineer, Dayton Scale Division.

Howe Scale Co.: R. F. Straw, Vice President, 685 Stewart Ave., S.W., Atlanta, Ga.

Pat Pratico, Quality Control Manager, 2941 Scale Ave., Rutland, Vt. G. D. Wilkinson, National Service Manager.

Kanawha Valley Scale Service Co.: P. E. Bradbury, Owner, P.O. Box 221,

r Dunbar, W. Va.

Knox Glass, Inc.: H. K. Knight, Knox, Pa.

Lily-Tulip Cup Corp.: M. W. Wilder, 122 E. 42nd St., New York, N.Y.

Liquid Controls Corp.: G. B. Richards, Commonwealth Ave., North Chicago, 111. Lockheed Electronics Co:

Michael Pappas, Design Mechanical Engineer, Information Technology

Division, Metuchen, N.J. Donato Sammarco, Sales Representative.

Daniel Semels, Assistant Division Manager.

Richard Weinberg, Director of Operations.

Mclntyre, John J., Sons, Inc.: F. L. McIntyre, President, 514-16 Knorr St., Philadelphia, Pa. Measuregraph Co.: F. L. Wall, Representative, 6603 Arlington Blvd., Falls

Church, Va.

Miller, Byron, & Associates: B. D. Miller, Owner, 7712 Georgia Ave., N.W.,

Washington, D.C.

Murphy, L. R., Scale Co.:

L. R. Murphy, President, 1610-12 N. "C" St., Sacramento, Calif. Kenneth Murphy.

Neptune Meter Co.: Fred Kutch, Sales Manager, Petroleum and Industrial Meters, 34th St. & 47th

Ave., Long Island City, N.Y.

W. A. Medford, Engineer.

E. F. Wehmann, Assistant Chief Engineer.

Nicol Scales, Inc.: W. F. Nicol, President, 1315 S. Akard St., Dallas, Tex.

Owens-Illinois Glass Co.: F. B. Busch, Specifications Engineer, P.O. Box 1035,

Toledo, Ohio.

Penn Scale Manufacturing Co., Inc.: Sydney Black, President, 150 W. Berks St., Philadelphia, Pa. Pottermeter Corp.: M. Bayer, Industrial Sales Manager, U.S. Route #22, Union,

N.J. Revere Corp. of America:

C. W. Silver, Sales Manager, Wallingford, Conn.

H. L. Zupp, Sales Engineer.

173
Richardson Scale Co.: I. H. Richardson, President, Clifton, N.J. Rockwell Manufacturing Co.: A. J. Komich, Product Manager, Liquid Meters,

Box 450, Statesboro, Ga.

Sanitary Scale Co.: E. C. Karp, Vice President, Manufacturing and Engineering, 910 E. Lincoln

Ave., Belvidere, 111. Sven Berglund, Plant Engineer.

Sauter, August, of New York, Inc.: H. G. Shimp, Jr., Manager, 866 Willis Ave.,

Albertson, Long Island, N.Y.

Seraphin Test Measure Co.: T. A. Seraphin, General Manager, 1314 N. 7th St., Philadelphia, Pa. Smith, A. O., Corp.: L. G. Blumenberg, Manager, Field Service, Smith-Erie

Division, 1602 Wagner Ave., Erie, Pa. Stimpson Computing Scale Co.: J. J. Waage, President, 829 Logan St., Louisville,

Ky.

Streeter-Amet Co.: R. T. Isham, President, Grayslake, 111. C. L. Richard, Consultant, 703 S. Ola Vista, San Clemente, Calif. Suburban Rulane Gas Co., John MacIntosh, Chief Engineer, 2317 Thrift Rd.,

Charlotte, N.C.

Symington Wayne Corp.:

W. J. Dubsky, Manager of Engineering, Wayne Pump Co. Division, Salisbury,

Md.

F. W. Love, Engineering Department.

Thatcher Glass Manufacturing Co.: R. E. Chapman, Elmira, N.Y.

A. C. Thomas, Service Department.

L. E. Young, Manager, Customer Service.

Thurman Scale Co.: J. R. Schaeffer, Vice President, 1939 Refugee Rd., Columbus, Ohio.

Tokheim Corp.: William Louthan, Manager, Field Service, 1600 Wabash Ave.,

Fort Wayne, Ind.

Toledo Scale Co.:

F. D. Instone, Vice President, Toledo, Ohio.

D. B. Kendall, Manager, Product Engineering.

J. G. Lewis, Manager, Marketing Research.

R. V. Miller, National Manager of Weights and Measures and Sanitary StandR. E. Lenox, District Manager, 3329 8th St., N.E., Washington, D.C.

Torsion Balance Co.: J. P. Slane, Eastern Sales Representative, 35 Monhegan

St., Clifton, N.J. Troemner, Henry, Inc.: C. F. Rosica, Sales Manager, 22nd and Master Sts., Philadelphia, Pa. Veeder-Root, Inc.:

J. J. Brannick, Sales Manager, Computer Division, 70 Sargeant St., Hartford,

Conn.

A. E. McKeever, Sales Manager, Master Meter Duplicator Division.

Voland Corp.: Bernard Wasko, Chief Engineer, 27 Centre Ave., New Rochelle,

N.Y.

Wood, John, Co.:

L. G. Close, Manager, Mid-Atlantic States, Bennett Pump Division, 2127 N.

Charles St., Baltimore, Md.

M. S. Godsman, Service Manager, Bennett Pump Division, Broadway and

Wood Sts., Muskegon, Mich.

W. M. Hoxie, Service Department.

Associate Members—Associations, Business and Industry, and Railroads

American Institute of Baking: W. M. Schieb, Maintenance Inspector, 400 E. Ontario St., Chicago, 111. American Petroleum Institute, J. E. Moss, Consultant, Division of Transportation, 1625 K St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

American Standards Association: A. C. Hutton, Staff Engineer, c/o National

Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C.

Association of American Soap and Glycerine Producers, Inc.: R. W. Peet,

Manager, 295 Madison Ave., New York, N.Y.

174
Cook Chemical Co.: Don Gholson, Chief Chemist, 2500 Summit, Kansas City,

Mo.

Cooperative League of the U.S.A.: J. T. Jennings, Associate Director, Washington Office, 1025 Vermont Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C.

Corn Products Co: Virginia McCarthy, Statistician, 99 Ave. A, Bayonne, N.J. Dairv Industries Supply Association: D. H. Williams, Technical Director,

1145-19th St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

Distilled Spirits Institute, Inc.: R. W. Coyne, President, 1132 Pennsylvania Bldg., Washington, D.C.

B. J. O'Callaghan, Director, Press and Public Relations Division, 425 13th

St., X.W., Washington, D.C.

Esso Standard: L. L. Kennedy, Manager, Construction and Maintenance, 500 N.

Broad St., Elizabeth, N.J. Gasoline Pump Manufacturers Association: G. T. Wright, Managing Director,

551 Fifth Ave., New York, N.Y.

General Foods Corp.:

C. A. Clark, Fire-Safety and Sanitation Coordinator, 250 North St., White

Plains, N.Y.

J. J. Halsey, Consultant, Quality Services.

General Mills, Inc.: O. A. Oudal, Assistant Director, Products Control, 9200

Wayzata Blvd., Minneapolis, Minn.

I Glass' Container Manufacturers Institute, Inc.: C. E. Wagner, Development

Engineer, 99 Park Aye., New York, N.Y.

Grand Union Co.: M. R. Socolof, General Manager and Executive Vice President, Washington

Division, 7000 Sheriff Rd., Landover, Md.

Earl Redner, Superintendent of Stores. Greenbelt Consumer Services, Inc.: E. D. Jones, 2706 Harris Ave., Wheaton, Md.

Aileen Newman, 10703 Clermont Ave., Garrett Park, Md.

Liquefied Petroleum Gas Association: W. H. Johnson, Staff Engineer, 11 S. LaSalle St., Chicago, 111. Mayer, Oscar, & Co.:

J. C. Bard, Director of Product Research, 910 Mayer Ave., Madison, Wis.

D. L. Paul, General Product Controller.

Milk Industry Foundation: E. B. Kellogg, Director of Technical Services,

1145 19th St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

National Association of Dairy Equipment Manufacturers: John Marshall,

Executive Vice President, 1012 14th St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

National Canners Association: G. E. Steele, Assistant to the Executive Vice

President, 1133 20th St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

I National Fisheries Institute: H. W. Magnusson, Technology Director, 1614

20th St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc.: Louis Reznek, Director of Engineering and

Safety, 1616 P St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

Paper Cup and Container Institute, Inc.: R. W. Foster, Assistant to Executive

Director, 250 Park Ave., New York, N.Y.

Paper, Stationery, and Tablet Manufacturing Association, Inc.: E. P. Eaton, "Executive Secretary, 444 Madison Ave., Suite 2102, New York,

N.Y.

R. L. Bullington.

F. M. McIntosh, Southern Central Co., 7365 Dudly, Memphis, Tenn.

Phillips Petroleum Co.: A. F. Dyer, Technical Representative, Bartlesville,

Okla.

Pillsbury Co.: C. E. Joyce, General Claim Manager, 608 Second Ave., S., Minneapolis, Minn.

Procter & Gamble Co.:

J. H. Chaloud, Associate Director, Product Development Division, Ivorydale

Technical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

D. R. Byerly, Assistant Director, Research and Development.

H. B. Stevenson.

J. C. Ervin.

Pyrofax Gas Corporation: W. H. Scott, Service Manager, 295 Madison Ave.,

"New York, N.Y.

Quaker Oats Co.: F. A. Dobbins, Quality Control Manager, Chicago, 111.

; Republic Steel Corp.: D. R. Smith, Corporation Weighing Supervisor, 410

Oberlin Rd., S.W., Massillon, Ohio.

175
Saybolt, J. W., Business Counselor on Weights and Measures Laws, 9209

Carlyle Ave., Surfside, Miami Beach, Fla. Scale Journal Publishing Co.: J. K. Pickell, Editor, 176 W. Adams Street,

Chicago 3, 111. Scale Manufacturers Association: Arthur Sanders, Secretary, One Thomas

Circle, Washington, D.C.

Sun Oil Co.: E. W. Hess, Manager, General Marketing Operations, 1608 Walnut St., Philadelphia, Pa. W. A. Pierson, Special Assistant.

Swift & Co.: E. G. Spiker, Head, Washington, D.C. Law Department, 711

14th St., N.W., Washington, D.C.

Thread Institute, Inc.: W. F. Operer, Executive Director, 15 E. 40th St., New York, N.Y.

Tissue Association: C. J. Carey, Executive Secretary, 122 E. 42nd St., New

York, N.Y.

Visking Co., Division of Union Carbide Corp.: W. M. Sawers, Manager, Special

Services, 800 Wyatt Bldg., Washington, D.C.

Western Weighing and Inspection Bureau: C. G. Johnson, Supervisor, Weight

Agreements and Weighing, Room 460 Union Station, 517 W. Adams St., Chicago, 111. Guests

Blickley, J. F., 4538 North Carlisle St., Philadelphia, Pa. Caulfield, M. J., Westville Rd., Almonesson, N.J.

Lirio, Alfred, P.O. Box 369, Vineland, N.J. McBride, J. P., 3 Livermore Rd., Belmont, Mass.

Phillips, C. S., Chief, Weights and Measures Division, Standards Branch,

Department of Trade and Commerce, Ottawa, Canada.

Powers, J. J., 1347 Jerome St., Philadelphia, Pa. Roberts, J. R., Chief Inspector of Weights and Measures and Secretary, The

Institute of YVeights and Measures Administration England, 57a Newton St., Piccadilly, Manchester, England.

176

THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

The scope of activities of the National Bureau of Standards at its major

laboratories in Washington, D.C., and Boulder, Colo., is suggested in the fol- lowing listing of the divisions and sections engaged in technical work. In

general, each section carries out specialized research, development, and engineering in the field indicated by its title. A brief description of the activities,

and of the resultant publications, appears on the inside of the front cover. WASHINGTON, D.C.

Electricity. Resistance and Reactance. Electrochemistry. Electrical Instru- ments. Magnetic Measurements. Dielectrics.

Metrology. Photometry and Colorimetry. Refractometry. Photographic Research. Length. Engineering Metrology. Mass and Scale. Volume-try and

Densimetry.

Heat. Temperature Physics. Heat Measurements. Cryogenic Physics. Equation of State. Statistical Physics.

Radiation Physics. X-ray. Radioactivity. Radiation Theory. High Energy

Radiation. Radiological Equipment. Nucleonic Instrumentation. Neutron

Physics.

Analytical and Inorganic Chemistry. Pure Substances. Spectrochemistry.

Solution Chemistry. Standard Reference Materials. Applied Analytical Research.

Mechanics. Sound. Pressure and Vacuum. Fluid Mechanics. Engineering

Mechanics. Rheology. Combustion Controls.

Organic and Fibrous Materials. Rubber. Textiles. Paper. Leather. Testing

and Specifications. Polymer Structure. Plastics. Dental Research.

Metallurgy. Thermal Metallurgy. Chemical Metallurgy. Mechanical

Metallurgy. Corrosion. Metal Physics. Electrolysis and Metal Deposition.

Mineral Products. Engineering Ceramics. Glass. Refractories. Enameled

Metals. Crystal Growth. Physical Properties. Constitution and Microstructure.

Building Research. Structural Engineering. Fire Research. Mechanical Systems. Organic Building Materials. Codes and Safety Standards. Heat Transfer.

Inorganic Building Materials.

Applied Mathematics. Numerical Analysis. Computation. Statistical Engineering. Mathematical Physics. Operations Research.

Data Processing Systems. Components and Techniques. Digital Circuitry.

Digital Systems. Analog Systems. Applications Engineering.

Atomic Physics. Spectroscopy. Infrared Spectroscopy. Solid State Physics.

Electron Physics. Atomic Physics.

Instrumentation. Engineering Electronics. Electron Devices. Electronic In- strumentation. Mechanical Instruments. Basic Instrumentation.

Physical Chemistry. Thermochemistry. Surface Chemistry. Organic Chemistry. Molecular Spectroscopy. Molecular Kinetics. Mass Spectrometry.

Office of Weighls and Measures

U.S. GOVERNMENT PPINTING OFFICE: 1961
BOULDER, COLORADO

Cryogenic Engineering. Cryogenic Equipment. Cryogenic Processes. Properties of Materials. Gas Liquefaction.

Radio Propagation Physics. Low Frequency and Very Low Frequency Research. Ionosphere Research. Prediction Services. Sun-Earth Relationships.

Field Engineering. Radio Warning Services.

Radio Propagation Engineering. Data Reduction Instrumentation. Radio

Noise. Tropospheric Measurements. Tropospheric Analysis. Propagation-Terrain Effects. Radio-Meteorology. Lower Atmospheric Physics.

Radio Standards. High-Frequency Electrical Standards. Radio Broadcast

Service. Radio and Microwave Materials. Electronic Calibration Center. Millimeter—Wave Research. Microwave Circuit Standards.

Radio Communication and Systems. High Frequency and Very High Fre- quency Research. Modulation Research. Antenna Research. Navigation

Systems. Space Telecommunications.

Upper Atmosphere and Space Physics. Upper Atmosphere and Plasma Physics.

Ionosphere and Exosphere Scatter. Airglow and Aurora. Ionospheric Radio

Astronomy.
I