alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 729.33

 729.87

 730.20

 730.55

 730.93

 731.17

 731.46

 731.74

 732.01

 732.27

 732.58

 733.07

 733.38

 733.21

 733.21

 733.21

 733.21

 733.22

 729.97

 730.52

 731.01

 731.37

 731.73

 732.07

 732.38

 732.71

 732.96

 733.22

 733.47

 734.08

 734.40

 1,548

 1,571

 1,584

 1,599

 1,615

 1,625

 1,638

 1,650

 1,661

 1,673

 1,687

 1,708

 1,722

 1,714

 1,714

 1,714

 1,714

 1,715

 1,575

 1,598

 1,618

 1,634

 1,649

 1,664

 1,678

 1,692

 1,703

 1,715

 1,726

 1,753

 1,767

STORAGE

+14

+23

+13

+15

+16

+10

+13

+12

+11

+12

+14

+21

+14

-8

+0

+0

+0

+1

-140

+23

+20

+16

+15

+15

+14

+14

+11

+12

+11

+27

+14

CHANGE

7

12

7

8

8

5

7

6

6

6

7

11

7

-4

0

0

0

79

33

12

10

8

8

8

7

7

6

6

6

14

7

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 78

 104

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2020

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +233 304 0 182

ACRE-FEET +233 603 0 361

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 361

 361

 1,534

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21522]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket OST-2003-15944]


Office of the Secretary; Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for 
Exemption from 14 CFR 212.3 Permitting Limited Waiver of Advance 
Charter Payment

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2004-9-18).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation is directing all interested 
persons to show cause why it should not issue an order granting to 
Delta Air Lines, Inc. (``Delta'') a one-year exemption from 14 CFR 
212.3(e) with respect to single-entity charters using jet aircraft 
having more than 100 seats provided to Fortune 500 Companies, 
permitting in such cases only, that advance payment of the charter 
price may be waived in whole or in part by the carrier and charter 
customer jointly, as described more fully in Order 2004-9-18. Under the 
order, where such a waiver has been made only in part, the amount of 
any bond required under this exemption, or the amount of a 
corresponding substitute letter of credit (under Order 2003-11-16), 
need not exceed the amount of the charter price actually collected by 
the carrier.

DATES: Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than 
October 4, 2004. Answers to objections should be filed no later than 
October 11, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments, objections, and answers to objections should be 
filed in Docket OST-2003-15944 and addressed to the Department of 
Transportation Dockets (M-30, Room PL-401), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590 and 
should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Robert Foss, Office of Aviation 
Enforcement and Proceedings (C-70, Room 4116), U.S. Department of 
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 
366-9342.

    Dated: September 20, 2004.
Robert S. Goldner,
Special Counsel to Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International 
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 04-21522 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 714.68

 714.94

 715.20

 715.46

 715.70

 715.95

 716.20

 716.47

 716.65

 716.83

 717.13

 717.33

 717.54

 717.97

 718.20

 718.40

 718.59

 718.75

 718.95

 719.15

 719.87

 721.44

 721.94

 722.30

 722.58

 722.83

 723.08

 723.29

 720.46

 716.79

 1,005

 1,013

 1,022

 1,030

 1,038

 1,046

 1,055

 1,064

 1,069

 1,075

 1,085

 1,092

 1,099

 1,114

 1,122

 1,129

 1,136

 1,141

 1,148

 1,155

 1,181

 1,238

 1,257

 1,270

 1,280

 1,290

 1,299

 1,307

 1,203

 1,074

STORAGE

+11

+8

+9

+8

+8

+8

+9

+9

+5

+6

+10

+7

+7

+15

+8

+7

+7

+5

+7

+7

+26

+57

+19

+13

+10

+10

+9

+8

-104

-129

CHANGE

7

5

6

5

5

5

6

6

4

4

6

5

5

9

5

5

5

4

5

5

14

30

11

8

6

6

6

5

-10

-15

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 42

 50

 1030

 1030

 1105

 1005

 1010

TIME

 .16

 .16

 .15

 .14

 .13

COPPER

 .47

 .48

 .48

 .53

 .47

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2007 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 18, 2007

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +80 168 0 120

ACRE-FEET +80 333 0 238

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 238

 238

 994

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .002

 .002

 .002

 .002

 .003

Table 7
TABLE 32
 
                    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR -   BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
 
                                         MADERA CANAL AND MILLERTON LAKE
                                                       1994
Monyhly Deliveries in AF
 
 
       WATER USERS      JAN    FEB    MAR    APR    MAY    JUN    JUL    AUG    SEP    OCT    NOV    DEC    TOTAL
 
 
MADERA CANAL
 
  ADOBE RANCH            0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0        0
  CHOWCHILLA W.D.        0      0      0      0      0   9539  15463  22078   4701      0      0      0    51781
  MADERA I.D.            0      0      0      0  11038  24877  26887  20607   5150      0      0      0    88559
  GRAVELLY FORD          0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0        0
  LA BRANZA W.D.         0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0        0
  SOQUEL WATER           0      0      0      0      0      0      0   4625      0      0      0      0     4625
 
 
     TOTAL               0      0      0      0  11038  34416  42350  47310   9851   9851      0      0   144965
 
 
MILLERTON LAKE
 
  COUNTY OF MADERA       2      1      3      5      7      7      8      7      6      6      3      2       57
  FRESNO CO.  W.D. #     4      4      6      8      9     15     21     17     14     10      6      4      118
 
 
     TOTAL               6      5      9     13     16     22     29     24     20     16      9      6      175
 
 
*  Data supplied by Fresno Field Division, Contracts Administration Division
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60804

Summary Calendar

SAID ACOSTA NEPOMUCENO, also known as Said Acosta,

Petitioner

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A078 135 020

Before JONES, SMITH, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Said Acosta Nepomuceno, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) dismissing his appeal,

regarding the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order pretermitting his application for 

cancellation of removal. He claims the BIA and IJ erred in concluding he could 

not meet the required seven years of continuous residency after finding he was 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 28, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60804 Document: 00514250927 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2017
No. 15-60804

2

paroled into the United States, but not admitted in any status, prior to his 17 

August 2005 adjustment to lawful permanent resident.

Nepomuceno does not dispute the finding he was removable according to 

8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(B)(i) based upon his convictions for offenses involving 

controlled substances and has, therefore, abandoned any challenge on that

basis. Sama v. Hannigan, 669 F.3d 585, 589 (5th Cir. 2012); Soadjede v. 

Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). And, because Nepomuceno is 

removable as a criminal alien, we have jurisdiction to consider only 

constitutional claims or questions of law. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C), (D); BrievaPerez v. Gonzales, 482 F.3d 356, 359 (5th Cir. 2007). 

Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider Nepomuceno’s fact-based 

claims. Escudero-Arciniega v. Holder, 702 F.3d 781, 785 (5th Cir. 2012); 

Nakimbugwe v. Gonzales, 475 F.3d 281, 284 (5th Cir. 2007). Moreover, we lack 

jurisdiction to consider whether the IJ should have made an adverse inference 

regarding the Government’s failure to produce a more substantial immigration 

file because, by failing to raise the issue before the BIA, Nepomuceno did not 

exhaust his administrative remedies. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1); Omari v. Holder, 

562 F.3d 314, 321 (5th Cir. 2009); Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452–53 (5th 

Cir. 2001). 

To the extent Nepomuceno raises a question of law by asserting he was 

admitted in any status when immigration officials allegedly “waved” him 

through inspection, his claim is without merit because the IJ expressly 

concluded he was paroled into the country, not admitted; therefore, because we 

lack jurisdiction for this fact-based claim, the question of his “status” is 

immaterial. Tula-Rubio v. Lynch, 787 F.3d 288, 290–91 (5th Cir. 2015). 

DENIED in part and DISMISSED in part. 

 Case: 15-60804 Document: 00514250927 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2017
# Fourth **Court of**  **Appeals San**  **A ntonio,**  **T exas** 
June 26, 2019
Nos . 04-19-00192- CR

& 04- 19-00193- CR
John Joe AVALOS , Appellant

v.
The STATE of T exas, Appellee
From t he 437t h Judicial D istrict C ourt, Bexar C ounty, Texas Trial Court Nos . 2018CR7068 & 2016C R10374 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### C O NSO L I D A TION O R D E R Appellant ha s f

iled an unopposed motion to consolidate t hese a ppeals. We g rant t he motion and order A ppeal N os. 04-19-00192-CR a nd 04-19-00193-CR c onsolidated.
The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. The cases must be argued together in one brief,
as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is requested and granted, t he entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a single appeal. However, a separate record must be maintained in each appeal. If supplementation of the record becom es necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in each appeal to which it applies. The court will dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of June, 2019.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE , Clerk of Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

LETONI WILSON, § 

§ No. 446, 2016 

 Defendant-Below, § 

 Appellant, § 

§ Court Below − Superior Court 

v. § of the State of Delaware 

 § 

STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1507000321 

 § 

 Plaintiff-Below, § 

 Appellee. § 

Submitted: April 12, 2017 

Decided: April 26, 2017 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices. 

ORDER

 This 26th day of April 2017, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Superior 

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in its July 14, 

2016 opinion. 

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

 Justice
§ 2804.27 What fees must I pay if the BLM denies my application or if I withdraw my application or relinquish my grant? If the BLM denies or you withdraw your application, or you relinquish your grant, you owe the current fees for the applicable cost recovery category as set forth at § 2804.14, unless you have a Category 5 or 6 application, in which case, the following conditions apply: ( a ) If the BLM denies your Category 5 or 6 right-of-way application, you are liable for all reasonable costs that the United States incurred in processing it. The money you have not paid is due within 30 calendar days after receiving a bill for the amount due;
( b ) You may withdraw your Category 5 or 6 application in writing before the BLM issues a grant. If you do so, you are liable for all reasonable processing costs the United States has incurred up to the time you withdraw the application and for the reasonable costs of terminating your application. Any money you have not paid is due within 30 calendar days after receiving a bill for the amount due. Any money you paid that is not used to cover costs the United States incurred as a result of your application will be refunded to you; and
( c ) You may relinquish your grant in writing. If you do so, you are liable for all reasonable costs the United States has incurred up to the time you relinquish the grant and for the reasonable costs of closing your grant. Any cost recovery fees you have not previously paid are due within 30 calendar days after receiving a bill for the amount due. The BLM will refund any cost recovery fees you paid in Categories 5 or 6 that were not used to cover costs the United States incurred as a result of your grant.
[89 FR 25962, Apr. 12, 2024]
#### § 2470.1 Opening of lands to disposal.

After lands have been classified for disposal, the authorized officer shall, at the appropriate time, open the lands to those forms of disposal consistent with the classification.

[35 FR 9565 June 13, 1970]
§ 2.4 Does where you send your request affect its processing? ( a ) A request to a particular bureau or a bureau component (for example, a request addressed to a regional or field office) will be presumed to seek only records from that particular bureau or component. A request will not be forwarded to another bureau or component unless it is clear on the face of your request that it was misdirected. For example, if you address your request to an appropriate FOIA contact in the National Park Service and ask for records concerning a specific park, but your request is delivered to the Fish and Wildlife Service, your request was clearly misdirected. In such a case, a FOIA contact in the receiving bureau or component will route the request to a FOIA contact in the proper bureau or component. If you need assistance determining where to send a request, you may seek assistance from the bureau's designated FOIA contact or FOIA Requester Center (see § 2.66 of this part).
( b ) If you seek records from an entire bureau, submit your request to the bureau FOIA Officer. The bureau FOIA Officer will forward it to the bureau component(s) that he or she believes has or are likely to have responsive records.
( c ) If a request to a bureau states that it seeks records located at another specific component of the same bureau, the appropriate FOIA contact will forward the request to the other component.
( d ) If a request to a bureau states that it seeks records from other unspecified components within the same bureau, the appropriate FOIA contact will send the request to the Bureau FOIA Officer. He or she will forward it to the components that the bureau FOIA Officer believes have or are likely to have responsive records.
[77 FR 76902, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 92694, Dec. 20, 2016; 84 FR 61826, Nov. 14, 2019]
APPENDIX O 

Residential Construction Plans 

for the Constitution Pipeline Project

Date: February 2014

Not to Scale Residential Co

PA-SU-061.0

O-1
Date: February 2014

Not to Scale Residential Co

ALT-B-NY-BR-0

O-2
Date: February 2014

Not to Scale Residential Co

ALT-F-NY-SC-00

O-3
Date: February 2014

Not to Scale Residential Co

ALT-F-NY-SC-0

O-4
Date: February 2014

Not to Scale Residential Co

ALT-Q-UA-NY-SC-

O-5
Date: February 2014

Not to Scale Residential Co

ALT-Q-NY-SC-01

O-6
Date: February 2014

Not to Scale Residential Co

ALT-Q-UA-SC-02

O-7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,306.19

 2,306.38

 2,306.56

 2,306.73

 2,307.04

 2,307.94

 2,308.45

 2,309.06

 2,309.65

 2,310.20

 2,310.72

 2,311.15

 2,311.62

 2,312.65

 2,313.27

 2,313.72

 2,314.08

 2,314.39

 2,314.77

 2,315.13

 2,315.58

 2,316.16

 2,316.58

 2,316.85

 2,317.23

 2,317.69

 2,318.05

 2,318.58

 2,318.97

 2,319.28

 2,319.53

 1,536.6

 1,538.9

 1,541.1

 1,543.2

 1,547.0

 1,558.1

 1,564.4

 1,571.9

 1,579.2

 1,586.1

 1,592.6

 1,598.0

 1,603.9

 1,616.8

 1,624.7

 1,630.4

 1,634.9

 1,638.9

 1,643.7

 1,648.3

 1,654.1

 1,661.5

 1,667.0

 1,670.4

 1,675.3

 1,681.3

 1,686.0

 1,692.9

 1,697.9

 1,702.0

 1,705.3

STORAGE

+1.0

+2.3

+2.2

+2.1

+3.8

+11.1

+6.3

+7.5

+7.3

+6.8

+6.5

+5.4

+5.9

+13.0

+7.8

+5.7

+4.6

+4.0

+4.8

+4.6

+5.8

+7.4

+5.4

+3.5

+4.9

+6.0

+4.7

+6.9

+5.1

+4.1

+3.3

CHANGE

778

1,453

1,354

1,329

2,200

5,861

3,413

4,095

3,968

4,084

3,553

3,030

3,335

6,857

4,271

3,091

2,655

2,382

2,778

2,601

3,086

3,904

2,775

2,132

2,731

3,279

2,582

3,703

2,774

2,362

1,933

INFLOW

 281

 281

 204

 280

 287

 282

 230

 278

 273

 627

 279

 318

 339

 318

 299

 206

 339

 390

 335

 253

 179

 152

 32

 375

 256

 276

 188

 221

 206

 277

 280

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 4

 0

 40

 0

 0

 0

 7

 15

 0

 7

 0

 0

 22

 0

 19

 7

 11

 0

 0

 30

 0

 0

 15

 4

 0

 0

 42

 4

 8

 42

 4

C.F.S.

 .01

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .01

 .02

 .11

 .01

INCHES

 .11

 .37

 .53

 .09

 .11

 .75

 .05

 .21

 .21

 .19

 .10

 .09

 .01

 .65

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .30

 .37

 .14

 .69

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .82

 .38

 .30

 1.64

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 5, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +169.8 94,349 8,541 0 0 281 .75 8.39

ACRE-FEET +169,800 187,141 16,941 0 0 557

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 16,941

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 16,941

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.39

JULY 1, 2010 18.60

 1,535.6

(1) (1)
Exhibit 99.2

                                                                   June 20, 2003

Dear Shareowner:

         I am pleased to inform you that today the Board of Directors of Nam Tai
Electronics,  Inc.  has approved a resolution  to effect a  three-for-one  stock
split of all outstanding Nam Tai common shares on June 30, 2003.

         Holders  of  record  of Nam  Tai's  common  shares  as of the  close of
business  on June 30,  2003,  which will be the record  date,  will  receive two
shares of Nam Tai common  shares  for every one share of Nam Tai  common  shares
held.  No action is  required  on your part to  receive  your new Nam Tai common
shares  and you  need  not  surrender  your  old  certificates  to  receive  new
certificates.  PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR PRESENT CERTIFICATES TO THE COMPANY AND
DO NOT DESTROY THEM.

         The stock  split is tax free to you to the extent  that you receive new
Nam Tai common  shares.  Your trading costs will increase to the extent that you
will be  trading  a  greater  number  of  common  shares  representing  the same
percentage interest in Nam Tai.

         The Board of  Directors  voted to approve  the stock  split in order to
enhance the  liquidity of Nam Tai common  shares.  The stock split will increase
the number of Nam Tai common shares  outstanding  from  12,169,168  shares as of
June 19, 2003 to approximately  36,507,504 shares as of the close of business on
June 30,  2003.  The par  value of each  common  share  will  remain  $0.01.  In
connection with the stock split, the Board of Directors approved an amendment to
Nam Tai's  Memorandum  and Articles of  Association  to increase  the  company's
authorized  share  capital to  $2,000,000  and its  authorized  common shares to
200,000,000.  The number of common  shares  reserved  under Nam Tai's 1993 Stock
Option  Plan  and  2001  Stock  Option  Plan  will  also  be  adjusted  for  the
three-for-one stock split.

         Nam Tai declared an annual dividend of $0.60 per common share for 2003,
payable  quarterly at $0.15 per share, per quarter.  The second quarter dividend
is payable on July 21, 2003 to holders of record as of June 30, 2003.  Quarterly
dividends  for the remainder of 2003 will be adjusted to reflect the stock split
so that commencing with the dividend payable on July 21, 2003, the dividend will
be $0.05 per common share.

         If you have any questions regarding the stock split, please contact Nam
Tai's   transfer    agent,    the   Registrar   and   Transfer    Company,    at
1-800-368-5948/(908)  497-2300 or Nam Tai's investor  relations  representative,
Pan Pacific I. R. Ltd., at 1-800-661-8831/(604) 669-7800.

Sincerely,

/s/Tadao Murakami

Chairman
<PAGE>
Exhibit 21


LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

1.       Roadway Express, Inc., a Delaware corporation
2.       Roadway Express International, Inc., a Delaware corporation
3.       Roadway S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation
4.       Roadway Express, B.V., a Netherlands corporation
5.       Roadway Reverse Logistics, Inc., an Ohio corporation
6.       Transcontinental Lease S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation
7.       Reimer Express Lines Ltd., a Canadian corporation
8.       Roadway Funding, Inc., a Delaware corporation
9.       Roadway Next Day Corporation, a Pennsylvania
10.      New Penn motor Express, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
11.      Arnold Transportation Services, Inc. a Pennsylvania corporation
12.      Maris, Inc., a Delaware Corporation