alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4538 

To amend section 248 of title 18, United States Code, to provide adequate 

penalties and remedies for attacks on facilities providing counseling about 

abortion alternatives and attacks on places of religious worship. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2022 

Mr. HAWLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 248 of title 18, United States Code, to 

provide adequate penalties and remedies for attacks on 

facilities providing counseling about abortion alternatives 

and attacks on places of religious worship. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pregnancy Resource 

5 Center Defense Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4538 IS

1 SEC. 2. ATTACKS ON FACILITIES PROVIDING COUNSELING 

2 ABOUT ABORTION ALTERNATIVES AND 

3 PLACES OF RELIGIOUS WORSHIP. 

4 (a) CRIMINAL PENALTIES.—Section 248(b)(1) of 

5 title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘, 

6 except that for a first offense, if the conduct involved a 

7 facility described in subsection (a)(3) that exclusively pro8 vides abortion-alternative services or involved a place of 

9 religious worship and did not involve exclusively a non10 violent physical obstruction, the length of imprisonment 

11 shall be not more than 3 years’’ after ‘‘or both’’. 

12 (b) CIVIL REMEDIES.—Section 248(c) of title 18, 

13 United States Code, is amended— 

14 (1) in paragraph (1)(B), in the second sentence, 

15 by inserting ‘‘, or $20,000 per violation for conduct 

16 involving a facility described in subsection (a)(3) 

17 that exclusively provides abortion-alternative services 

18 or involving a place of religious worship’’ after ‘‘per 

19 violation’’; and 

20 (2) in paragraph (2)(B)(i), by inserting ‘‘, 

21 $25,000 for a first violation, if the violation involved 

22 a facility described in subsection (a)(3) that exclu23 sively provides abortion-alternative services or in24 volved a place of religious worship and did not in25 volve exclusively a nonviolent physical obstruction,’’ 

26 after ‘‘physical obstruction’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4538 IS

1 SEC. 3. DESTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, AND 

2 PROPERTY. 

3 Section 844(i) of title 18, United States Code, is 

4 amended by inserting ‘‘or if the building is a facility de5 scribed in section 248(a)(3) that exclusively provides abor6 tion-alternative services or is a place of religious worship,’’ 

7 before ‘‘shall be imprisoned for not less than 7 years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

OMANDO DESHAW WESBY , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 2 3

- 446

[ April 20, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 0 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Michael Ian Rothschild , Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 11

- 000366CF10A, 11

- 012563CF10A,
11

- 014029CF10A, and 13

- 015181CF10A

.
Omando Deshaw Wesby

, Fort Lauderdale , pro se

.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

W ARNER , C ONNER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 3120.33 Agency inventory of leasing.

Until August 16, 2032, the BLM will from time to time calculate, for the preceding 1-year period before it issues a wind or solar energy right-of-way, the acreage for which expressions of interest have been submitted to the BLM and the sum total of acres offered for lease.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 574

 579

 581

 651

 666

 642

 654

 676

 673

 702

 720

 741

 745

 756

 759

 752

 759

 753

 754

 770

 775

 762

 742

 761

 786

 776

 757

 732

 723

 720

 558

 562

 563

 580

 641

 620

 630

 647

 655

 664

 689

 715

 729

 735

 751

 738

 748

 736

 737

 748

 764

 732

 729

 735

 765

 753

 722

 722

 699

 635

 565

 569

 572

 609

 656

 631

 642

 660

 663

 682

 704

 727

 737

 747

 756

 745

 754

 745

 743

 757

 771

 745

 735

 747

 778

 762

 740

 727

 711

 697

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 6, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 15,389

 15,437

 15,421

 15,412

 15,436

 15,443

 15,464

 15,538

 15,643

 15,770

 15,911

 16,077

 16,311

 16,583

 16,888

 17,152

 17,427

 17,706

 17,993

 18,331

 18,691

 19,026

 19,320

 19,630

 19,979

 20,285

 20,536

 20,753

 20,937

 21,077

 513

 515

 514

 514

 515

 515

 515

 518

 521

 526

 530

 536

 544

 553

 563

 572

 581

 590

 600

 611

 623

 634

 644

 654

 666

 676

 685

 692

 698

 703

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 2806.22 When and how does the Per Acre Rent Schedule change? ( a ) Each calendar year the BLM will adjust the per acre rent values in § 2806.20 for all types of linear right-of-way facilities in each zone based on the average annual change in the IPD-GDP for the 10-year period immediately preceding the year that the NASS Census data becomes available. For example, the average annual change in the IPD-GDP from 1994 to 2003 (the 10-year period immediately preceding the year (2004) that the 2002 National Agricultural Statistics Service Census data became available) was 1.9 percent. This annual adjustment factor is applied to years 2006 through 2015 of the Per Acre Rent Schedule. Likewise, the average annual change in the IPD-GDP from 2004 to 2013 (the 10-year period immediately preceding the year (2014) when the 2012 NASS Census data will become available) will be applied to years 2016 through 2025 of the Per Acre Rent Schedule.
( b ) The BLM will review the NASS Census data from the 2012 NASS Census, and each subsequent 10-year period, and as appropriate, revise the number of county zones and the per acre zone values. Any revision must include 100 percent of the number of counties and listed geographical areas for all states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and must reasonably reflect the increases or decreases in the average per acre land and building values contained in the NASS Census.
[73 FR 65072, Oct. 31, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 92216, Dec. 19, 2016]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 558

 534

 552

 563

 582

 618

 645

 727

 716

 693

 780

 777

 755

 737

 709

 673

 665

 658

 656

 677

 684

 700

 696

 675

 702

 717

 690

 682

 672

 700

 513

 491

 512

 518

 531

 531

 554

 571

 597

 615

 603

 727

 690

 656

 632

 614

 595

 586

 609

 615

 621

 551

 652

 598

 634

 683

 660

 654

 646

 640

 536

 513

 529

 540

 558

 567

 598

 651

 665

 652

 734

 756

 731

 714

 679

 644

 645

 631

 636

 650

 659

 659

 680

 643

 669

 698

 671

 669

 657

 651

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AU GUST 28, 2018

NO. 03

- 18

- 00262

- CR

Marques E ugene Guntz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 277TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PUR YEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudicati on of costs

is made.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of J.F

. , a child, * From the 3 2 6 th District Court

o f Taylor County

Trial Court No. 08921

- CX

.

No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 1 8 9

- C V * November 7 , 2019

* Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey

, C. J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cau se and concludes that there

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 501.53

 501.43

 501.88

 500.66

 502.00

 503.20

 503.74

 503.91

 503.15

 503.93

 503.02

 502.81

 503.64

 505.00

 503.29

 503.27

 504.03

 503.55

 503.34

 504.92

 505.62

 505.63

 505.46

 505.51

 505.00

 505.35

 505.59

 505.62

 505.67

 504.99

 56,972

 56,861

 57,358

 56,018

 57,490

 58,838

 59,454

 59,647

 58,781

 59,670

 58,633

 58,397

 59,340

 60,907

 58,941

 58,918

 59,785

 59,237

 58,998

 60,814

 61,636

 61,648

 61,448

 61,507

 60,907

 61,319

 61,601

 61,636

 61,695

 60,895

STORAGE

+585

-111

+497

-1,340

+1,472

+1,348

+616

+193

-866

+889

-1,037

-236

+943

+1,567

-1,966

-23

+867

-548

-239

+1,816

+822

+12

-200

+59

-600

+412

+282

+35

+59

-800

CHANGE

1,941

1,703

2,011

1,109

2,592

2,481

1,963

1,735

1,315

2,161

1,160

1,665

2,316

2,697

956

1,979

2,723

2,067

2,096

2,956

2,451

2,059

2,009

2,095

1,700

2,256

2,159

2,159

2,419

2,064

INFLOW

 1,641

 1,753

 1,754

 1,778

 1,822

 1,791

 1,644

 1,634

 1,752

 1,706

 1,679

 1,778

 1,837

 1,864

 1,870

 1,859

 1,862

 1,494

 1,856

 1,860

 1,872

 1,876

 1,875

 1,874

 1,873

 1,873

 1,876

 1,881

 1,876

 1,876

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 20

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 37

 71

 127

 420

 840

 351

 173

 154

 166

 220

 185

 124

 168

 135

 250

 503

 585

OUTLET

 5

 6

 6

 7

 8

 8

 8

 4

 0

 7

 4

 6

 4

 6

 6

 5

 4

 9

 9

 7

 11

 11

 15

 6

 5

 7

 6

 10

 10

 6

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 05/04/2009

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +4,508 60,997 53,986 0 4,531 206

ACRE-FEET +4,508 120,988 107,081 0 8,987 409

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 107,081

SPILL 0 116,068

 56,387

OUTLET 8,987

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,005

 1,602

 1,958

 1,114

 2,591

 2,455

 1,930

 1,692

 1,326

 2,121

 1,173

 1,643

 2,290

 2,701

 969

 1,968

 2,647

 1,955

 2,058

 2,940

 2,407

 2,074

 1,974

 2,060

 1,683

 2,324

 2,159

 2,136

 2,317

 1,944

 60,216

 119,438

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND 

EVAPORATION.
Exhibit 10.2


 


CUSTOM TRUCK ONE SOURCE, INC.


 


May 21, 2021


 


Robert Blackadar


 


Dear Rob:


 


You and Custom Truck One Source,
Inc. (f/k/a NESCO Holdings, Inc., the “Company”) are parties to that certain employment agreement, dated as of May
13, 2019 (the “Employment Agreement”), which sets forth the terms of your employment with the Company. As we have discussed,
there may be some changes in roles and responsibilities at the Company as we progress and grow. In light of this, the Company would like
to offer you the opportunity to amend your Employment Agreement to provide you more time to consider any changes that may be made to your
role with the Company by extending the period within which you claim Good Reason (within the meaning of the Employment Agreement) resulting
from any such changes.


 


By your signature to this
letter, the Employment Agreement will be deemed amended to delete the second proviso of the definition of “Good Reason” in
Section 4(e) of the Employment Agreement and replace it in its entirety with the following: “and provided, further,
that “Good Reason” shall cease to exist for an event on the 120th day following the later of its occurrence or
Executive’s actual knowledge thereof, unless Executive has delivered a Notice of Good Reason prior to such date”.


 


All terms and provisions of
the Employment Agreement not amended hereby, either expressly or by necessary implication, will remain in full force and effect. This
letter and the Employment Agreement represent the entire understanding of the parties hereto and thereto with respect to the subject matter
hereof and thereof and supersede all prior arrangements and understandings regarding same.


 


Please sign and date this
letter and return it to me to indicate your acceptance of the amendment to your Employment Agreement.


 


 


		Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 CUSTOM TRUCK ONE SOURCE, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Adam Haubenreich
	 	Name: 	Adam Haubenreich
	 	Title:	Vice President – General Counsel, Secretary


 






     


     


    

 


	Accepted and Agreed by:	 
	 	 
	/s/ Robert Blackadar	 
	Robert Blackadar	 


 


[Signature Page to Good Reason Extension Letter]
§ 684.200 What are the requirements to apply for a Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act grant? ( a ) To be eligible to apply for a WIOA, sec. 166 grant, an entity must have legal status as a government or as an agency of a government, private non-profit corporation, or a consortium whose members all qualify as one of these entities.
( b ) A new entity (which is not an incumbent grantee) must have a population within the designated geographic service area which would receive at least $100,000 under the funding formula found at § 684.270(b), including any amounts received for supplemental youth services under the funding formula at § 684.440(a).
( c ) Incumbent grantees which do not meet this dollar threshold and were receiving INA funding of less than $100,000 as of October 18, 2016 will be grandfathered into the program and are eligible to be awarded less than $100,000 so long as the grantees have continuously received less than $100,000 since October 18, 2016.
( d ) The Department will make an exception to the $100,000 minimum for applicants that apply for WIOA funding through Public Law 102-477, the Indian, Employment, Training, and Related Services demonstration program, if all resources to be consolidated under the Public Law 102-477 plan total at least $100,000, with at least $20,000 derived from sec. 166 funds. However, incumbent Public Law 102-477 grantees that were receiving INA funding of less than $20,000 as of October 18, 2016 will be grandfathered into the program and are eligible to be awarded less than $20,000 so long as the grantees have continuously received less than $20,000 since October 18, 2016.
( e ) To be eligible to apply as a consortium, each member of the consortium must meet the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section and must: ( 1 ) Be in close proximity to one another, but may operate in more than one State;
( 2 ) Have an administrative unit legally authorized to run the program and to commit the other members to contracts, grants, and other legally-binding agreements; and
( 3 ) Be jointly and individually responsible for the actions and obligations of the consortium, including debts.
( f ) Entities eligible under paragraph (a)(1) of this section are: ( 1 ) Federally recognized Indian tribes;
( 2 ) Tribal organizations, as defined in 25 U.S.C. 450b;
( 3 ) Alaska Native-controlled organizations;
( 4 ) Native Hawaiian-controlled organizations;
( 5 ) Indian-controlled organizations serving INAs; and
( 6 ) A consortium of eligible entities which meets the legal requirements for a consortium described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( g ) State-recognized tribal organizations that meet the definition of an Indian-controlled organization are eligible to apply for WIOA sec. 166 grant funds. State-recognized tribes that do not meet this definition but were grantees under WIA as of July 1, 2015 will be grandfathered into WIOA as Indian-controlled organizations provided they meet the definition of Indian-controlled organization in § 684.130.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 285

 264

 246

 269

 348

 428

 449

 317

 249

 215

 214

 280

 310

 313

 250

 213

 206

 192

 177

 188

 194

 194

 187

 183

 189

 183

 192

 185

 193

 186

 187

 233

 228

 224

 227

 273

 361

 335

 235

 216

 188

 192

 216

 284

 253

 210

 200

 192

 151

 159

 169

 166

 163

 158

 172

 173

 172

 174

 178

 177

 176

 177

 251

 239

 235

 247

 312

 410

 416

 257

 239

 201

 201

 250

 301

 297

 226

 205

 201

 163

 167

 177

 179

 176

 176

 179

 177

 175

 178

 182

 182

 182

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 10, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 725.705 Is prior authorization for medical services required? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, medical services from an authorized provider which are payable under § 725.701 do not require prior approval of OWCP or the responsible operator.
( b ) Except where emergency treatment is required, prior approval of OWCP or the responsible operator must be obtained before any hospitalization or surgery, or before ordering medical equipment where the purchase price exceeds $300. A request for approval of non-emergency hospitalization or surgery must be acted upon expeditiously, and approval or disapproval will be given by telephone if a written response cannot be given within 7 days following the request. No employee of the Department of Labor, other than a district director or the Chief, Medical Audit and Operations Section, DCMWC, is authorized to approve a request for hospitalization or surgery by telephone.
§ 30.208 What happens after I file a request for review? ( a ) Within 30 days of receiving a request for review, OHA will notify the agency that prepared the probate file, all other affected agencies, and all interested parties of the request.
( b ) A judge will review the merits of the case, consider any allegations of errors in the summary probate decision, conduct a hearing if necessary or appropriate to address the issues raised in the request, and issue an order affirming, modifying, or vacating the summary probate decision.
( c ) The judge must distribute the final order on the request to review to each affected agency and to each interested party. The order must include a notice stating that interested parties who are adversely affected, or BIA, have a right to appeal the final order to the Board within 30 days of the date on which the final order was mailed, and giving the Board's address.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 548

 557

 549

 510

 518

 516

 513

 498

 470

 503

 515

 553

 542

 548

 532

 542

 532

 515

 525

 512

 471

 454

 458

 472

 514

 516

 528

 546

 519

 566

 682

 531

 531

 502

 489

 502

 493

 486

 455

 444

 456

 472

 507

 519

 525

 523

 522

 511

 504

 506

 470

 433

 427

 436

 445

 478

 505

 496

 514

 500

 497

 584

 542

 537

 527

 497

 508

 501

 501

 474

 459

 477

 494

 536

 533

 538

 526

 536

 523

 511

 515

 490

 453

 436

 447

 459

 499

 511

 517

 532

 511

 525

 658

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Imre EszenyiName:
    Imre EszenyiTitle:
    Acting President and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Paul BiberkrautName:
    Paul BiberkrautTitle:
    Chief Financial and
Administrative Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual report of Gammacan International Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dan
J. Gelvan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  January 13, 2005                             By: /s/ DAN J. GELVAN
                                                        ------------------
                                                        Dan J. Gelvan
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
§ 3105.41 Where filed. ( a ) Applications for subsurface storage or designations of successor operator must be filed in the proper BLM office.
( b ) The final gas storage agreement signed by all the parties in interest must be submitted to the BLM.
( c ) Applications for subsurface storage agreements or designations of successor operator must include the processing fee found in the fee schedule in § 3000.120 of this chapter.
### §1772c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–228, §5, Dec. 31, 1987, 101 Stat. 1558, which related to approval of prior transfers and extinguishment of claims and aboriginal title involving Florida Indians, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.