alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,281.86

 2,281.43

 2,281.05

 2,280.67

 2,280.31

 2,279.94

 2,279.54

 2,279.11

 2,278.68

 2,278.28

 2,277.87

 2,277.44

 2,277.04

 2,276.63

 2,276.21

 2,275.77

 2,275.36

 2,274.90

 2,274.40

 2,273.98

 2,273.54

 2,273.12

 2,272.70

 2,272.27

 2,271.86

 2,271.45

 2,271.06

 2,270.66

 2,270.26

 2,269.83

 1,258.9

 1,254.4

 1,250.4

 1,246.5

 1,242.7

 1,238.8

 1,234.7

 1,230.2

 1,225.8

 1,221.7

 1,217.4

 1,213.0

 1,208.9

 1,204.8

 1,200.5

 1,196.0

 1,191.9

 1,187.2

 1,182.2

 1,178.0

 1,173.6

 1,169.4

 1,165.2

 1,161.0

 1,156.9

 1,152.9

 1,149.0

 1,145.1

 1,141.2

 1,137.0

STORAGE

-5.5

-4.5

-4.0

-4.0

-3.8

-3.9

-4.2

-4.5

-4.4

-4.1

-4.2

-4.4

-4.1

-4.2

-4.3

-4.5

-4.1

-4.6

-5.0

-4.2

-4.4

-4.2

-4.2

-4.3

-4.1

-4.0

-3.8

-3.9

-3.9

-4.2

CHANGE

-26

109

286

298

138

166

101

41

-84

39

41

80

79

73

65

7

29

-131

-175

-67

-39

37

167

30

138

49

92

105

140

59

INFLOW

 2,711

 2,312

 2,227

 2,227

 1,951

 2,060

 2,120

 2,199

 2,069

 2,045

 2,111

 2,223

 2,061

 2,106

 2,139

 2,181

 2,046

 2,131

 2,290

 2,058

 2,135

 2,098

 2,222

 2,123

 2,117

 2,026

 1,987

 2,039

 2,046

 2,105

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 34

 77

 74

 74

 83

 52

 73

 91

 85

 73

 57

 78

 84

 72

 81

 77

 74

 80

 68

 3

 41

 53

 50

 58

 67

 61

 43

 43

 69

 72

C.F.S.

 .11

 .25

 .24

 .24

 .27

 .17

 .24

 .30

 .28

 .24

 .19

 .26

 .28

 .24

 .27

 .26

 .25

 .27

 .23

 .01

 .14

 .18

 .17

 .20

 .23

 .21

 .15

 .15

 .24

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -127.5 1,847 64,165 0 0 1,947 6.52 .00

ACRE-FEET -127,500 3,664 127,271 0 0 3,862

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 127,271

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 127,271

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2008 .05

 1,264.4

(1) (1)
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Steve Lipman, Chief Executive Officer and John T. Conroy, Chief
Financial Officer of Y-Tel International, Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

             (1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Y-Tel International, Inc.
                 for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully
                 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

             (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of Y-Tel International, Inc.

Dated: April 14, 2005

                                              /s/ Steve Lipman
                                              ----------------------
                                              Steve Lipman
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              (Principal Executive Officer)

                                              /s/ John T. Conroy
                                              ----------------------
                                              John T. Conroy
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              (Principal Financial Officer
                                              and Principal Accounting Officer)






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Y-Tel International, Inc. and will
be retained by Y-Tel International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









                                   32.1 - 1
§ 30.227 What evidence is admissible at a probate hearing? ( a ) A judge conducting probate proceedings under this part may admit any written, oral, documentary, or demonstrative evidence that is: ( 1 ) Relevant, reliable, and probative;
( 2 ) Not privileged under Federal law; and
( 3 ) Not unduly repetitious or cumulative.
( b ) The judge may exclude evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the risk of undue confusion of the issues or delay.
( c ) Hearsay evidence is admissible. The judge may consider the fact that evidence is hearsay when determining its probative value.
( d ) A judge may admit a copy of a document into evidence or may require the admission of the original document. After examining the original document, the judge may substitute a copy of the original document and return the original.
( e ) The Federal Rules of Evidence do not directly apply to the hearing, but may be used as guidance by the judge and the parties in interpreting and applying the provisions of this section.
( f ) The judge may take official notice of any public record of the Department and of any matter of which federal courts may take judicial notice.
( g ) The judge will determine the weight given to any evidence admitted.
( h ) Any party objecting to the admission or exclusion of evidence must concisely state the grounds. A ruling on every objection must appear in the record.
( i ) There is no privilege under this part for any communication that: ( 1 ) Occurred between a decedent and any attorney advising a decedent; and
( 2 ) Pertained to a matter relevant to an issue between parties, all of whom claim through the decedent.
§ 2.13 How do consultations and referrals work? ( a ) When a bureau (other than the Office of Inspector General) locates responsive records that primarily concern another bureau or Federal Government agency that is subject to FOIA, the bureau will determine whether that bureau or agency would be better able to determine whether the record is exempt from disclosure.
( b ) If the bureau processing the request believes that another bureau or agency would be better able to determine whether the record is exempt from disclosure, the bureau will contact that bureau or agency to determine whether it should refer the record to that bureau or agency or consult with that bureau or agency. ( 1 ) If the bureau processing the request refers a record to another bureau or agency, that other bureau or agency will respond to you directly about that record. If the bureau processing the request consults with another bureau or agency, the bureau processing the request will respond to you directly.
( 2 ) If the bureau receives a request for records that another agency has classified under any applicable executive order concerning record classification, or that the bureau believes may be appropriate for classification by another agency, it will refer the request for those records to that agency for response.
( 3 ) Whenever a bureau refers any part of the responsibility for responding to a request to another bureau or agency, it will: ( i ) Document the referral;
( ii ) Maintain a copy of the referred record; and
( iii ) Notify you in writing of the referral, including whether all or part of your request has been referred, the name of the bureau or agency to which the record was referred, and that bureau or agency's FOIA contact information.
( 4 ) If disclosure of the identity of the agency to which the referral would be made could harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption, such as the exemption that protects ongoing law enforcement investigations, a referral would be inappropriate and the bureau will coordinate with the agency instead.
( c ) When a bureau receives a referral, the bureau will assign the referral to the appropriate processing track as described in § 2.15 of this part and process it according to the date that the consulting or referring bureau or agency received your request as described in § 2.14 of this part.
( d ) Bureaus may establish written agreements with other bureaus or agencies to eliminate the need for consultations or referrals for particular types of records.
[84 FR 61826, Nov. 14, 2019]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE COMMITMENT OF

LARRY JOHNSON

,

Appellant

. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00 222

- C V

Appeal from the

427th Judicial District Court

o f Travis County, Texas

(TC# D

- 1

- GN

- 20

- 007812 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. It appearing to this Court that

Appellant is indigent for purpose of appeal, this Court makes no further order with respect to costs.

This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023.

Y VONNE T. RODRIGUEZ

, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
§ 667.840 Is there an alternative dispute resolution process that may be used in place of an OALJ hearing? ( a ) Parties to a complaint which has been filed according to the requirements of § 667.800 may choose to waive their rights to an administrative hearing before the OALJ. Instead, they may choose to transfer the settlement of their dispute to an individual acceptable to all parties who will conduct an informal review of the stipulated facts and render a decision in accordance with applicable law. A written decision must be issued within 60 days after submission of the matter for informal review.
( b ) The waiver of the right to request a hearing before the OALJ will automatically be revoked if a settlement has not been reached or a decision has not been issued within the 60 days provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The decision rendered under this informal review process will be treated as a final decision of an Administrative Law Judge under section 186(b) of the Act.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25150]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10226]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

Notification of an Open Meeting of the National Defense 
University Board of Visitors (BOV); Correction

AGENCY: National Defense University, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 30, 2012 (77 FR 19265-19266), the National Defense 
University Board of Visitors gave notice of a meeting to be held on May 
2 and 3, 2012, from 11:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on May 2 and continuing on May 
3 from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. The Department of Defense announces that the 
meeting date and time have been changed. All other information in the 
notice remains the same.

DATES: The new meeting date and time is May 2, 2012 from 10 a.m. to 5 
p.m. The meeting originally scheduled for May 3, 2012 has been 
cancelled.

ADDRESSES: The Board of Visitors meeting will be held at Marshall Hall, 
Building 62, Room 155, the National Defense University, 300 5th Avenue 
SW., Fort McNair, Washington, DC 20319-5066.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The point of contact for this notice 
is Ms. Dolores Hodge at (202) 685-0082, Fax (202) 685-3748 or 
[email protected].

    Dated: April 24, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-10226 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
```
#### § 2568.63 Under what circumstances does BLM reject the appointment of a personal representative?

If the appointment process is incomplete at the time of allotment application filing, the prospective personal representative must file the proof of appointment with BLM within 18 months after the application filing deadline or BLM will reject the application.
### §2306. Authorization of appropriations

(a) There are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this chapter $2,500,000 for each of the fiscal years 1986 and 1987, and such sums as may be necessary for any subsequent fiscal year. The amounts appropriated under the authority of this subsection shall remain available without fiscal year limitation for purposes of carrying out the provisions of this chapter until all claims filed under this chapter have been resolved.

(b) Funds necessary to pay the expenses of administering this chapter shall be appropriated and expended under the authority of section 13 of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–500, §7, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2318.)
§ 2543.1 Applications. ( a ) Applications to purchase under the Act of September 21, 1922, must be signed by the applicant in the State of Arkansas. Such applications had to be filed within 90 days from the date of the passage of this Act, if the lands had been surveyed and plats filed, otherwise they must be filed within 90 days from the filing of such plats. The applicant must show that he is either a native-born or naturalized citizen of the United States, and, if naturalized, file record evidence thereof; must describe the land which he desires to purchase, together with the land claimed as the basis of his preference right to the lands applied for if he applies as a riparian owner, or if claiming otherwise, under what color of title his claim is based, and that the applied-for lands are not lawfully appropriated by a qualified settler or entryman under the public land laws, nor in the legal possession of any adverse applicant; the kind, character, and value of the improvements on the land covered by the application; when they were placed thereon; the extent of the cultivation had, if any, and how long continued. This application must be supported by the statements of two persons having personal knowledge of the facts alleged in the application.
( b ) All applications to purchase under the act must be accompanied by an application service fee of $10 which will not be returnable.
§ 2621.2 Publication and protests. ( a ) The State will be required to publish once a week for five consecutive weeks in accordance with § 1824.3 of this chapter, at its own expense, in a designated newspaper and in a designated form, a notice allowing all persons claiming the land adversely to file in the appropriate office their objections to the issuance of a certification to the State for lands selected under the law. A protestant must serve on the State a copy of the objections and furnish evidence of service to the appropriate land office.
( b ) The State must file a statement of the publisher, accompanied by a copy of the notice published, showing that publication has been had for the required time.
[35 FR 9607, June 13, 1970. Redesignated at 46 FR 24135, Apr. 29, 1981]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 166

 167

 163

 168

 171

 175

 181

 188

 194

 191

 195

 177

 191

 177

 182

 192

 185

 188

 173

 160

 154

 147

 140

 150

 169

 181

 176

 172

 169

 166

 160

 149

 150

 147

 154

 158

 166

 158

 161

 176

 166

 163

 159

 160

 163

 164

 174

 174

 166

 149

 118

 124

 124

 134

 134

 141

 153

 149

 152

 151

 152

 148

 157

 159

 155

 161

 166

 170

 166

 172

 185

 175

 178

 167

 172

 170

 174

 181

 180

 177

 163

 135

 134

 132

 137

 140

 161

 165

 163

 164

 160

 159

 153

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 15, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

## IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-60288

VARRY EDWARDS ANDERSON; MARTHA RUSH; LILLIE EDWARDS; CALVIN BEASLEY; BOBBY BANKS, JR; EDGAR DOUGLAS; ROSIETTA GROWDY; LYNDELL HENDERSON; DANNY HENDERSON; GEORGIA JENKINS; MARGARET ANDERSON; DAVID ANDERSON Plaintiffs - Appellants v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION; GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; YAZOO MOTOR COMPANY; HERRIN-GEAR CHEVROLET COMPANY INC; ALL STAR MOTORS; GREENVILLE AUTO MALL INC; YAZOO MOTORS; ROGERS USURY CHEVROLET; ROBERT OLSON; CLAUDE POTTER; RICHARD VOSS; DEREK WRIGHT; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, "A", "B", and "C", whether singular or plural, those other persons, corporations, firms or other entities whose wrongful conduct caused the injuries and damages to the plaintiff, all of whose true and correct names, are unknown; BLACKWELL CHEVROLET CO Defendants - Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, AND BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### AFFIRMED. See 5 TH 

### C IR


### . R. 47.6. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D March 11, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 564

 539

 540

 526

 506

 516

 555

 530

 556

 555

 651

 757

 820

 929

 1,002

 1,044

 1,086

 1,126

 1,142

 1,143

 488

 481

 510

 631

 665

 666

 679

 711

 719

 811

 529

 514

 496

 485

 482

 472

 511

 490

 497

 520

 544

 658

 761

 828

 934

 1,007

 1,047

 1,090

 1,127

 426

 442

 427

 452

 510

 570

 581

 642

 663

 686

 727

 539

 523

 512

 502

 494

 491

 532

 516

 527

 541

 593

 709

 795

 872

 970

 1,026

 1,064

 1,109

 1,135

 853

 456

 450

 485

 586

 618

 602

 659

 678

 700

 770

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 2564.2 No payment, publication or proof required on entry for native towns.

In connection with the entry of lands as a native town or village under section 3 of the said Act of May 25, 1926, no payment need be made as purchase money or as fees, and the publication and proof which are ordinarily required in connection with trustee townsites will not be required.
#### Albert M. Stadler, Respondent, v. James Everard’s Breweries, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,299.72

 2,299.58

 2,299.37

 2,299.15

 2,298.95

 2,298.77

 2,298.60

 2,298.39

 2,298.23

 2,298.12

 2,297.98

 2,297.95

 2,297.88

 2,297.83

 2,297.67

 2,297.57

 2,297.43

 2,297.46

 2,297.97

 2,298.07

 2,298.11

 2,298.06

 2,297.97

 2,297.91

 2,297.82

 2,297.75

 2,297.68

 2,297.56

 2,297.35

 2,297.17

 2,297.01

 1,458.9

 1,457.2

 1,454.8

 1,452.2

 1,449.8

 1,447.7

 1,445.7

 1,443.2

 1,441.4

 1,440.1

 1,438.4

 1,438.1

 1,437.3

 1,436.7

 1,434.8

 1,433.6

 1,432.0

 1,432.4

 1,438.3

 1,439.5

 1,439.9

 1,439.4

 1,438.3

 1,437.6

 1,436.6

 1,435.7

 1,434.9

 1,433.5

 1,431.1

 1,429.0

 1,427.1

STORAGE

-2.2

-1.7

-2.5

-2.6

-2.4

-2.1

-2.0

-2.5

-1.9

-1.3

-1.6

-0.4

-0.8

-0.6

-1.9

-1.2

-1.6

+0.4

+5.9

+1.2

+0.5

-0.6

-1.1

-0.7

-1.1

-0.8

-0.8

-1.4

-2.4

-2.1

-1.9

CHANGE

83

79

-106

-108

-47

20

310

248

99

370

285

286

226

183

161

197

215

948

3,325

955

513

511

269

302

272

137

202

206

176

292

159

INFLOW

 1,157

 859

 1,098

 1,135

 1,102

 1,054

 1,261

 1,487

 983

 990

 1,095

 445

 616

 436

 1,054

 768

 1,028

 762

 317

 326

 270

 789

 797

 637

 798

 538

 583

 904

 1,377

 1,350

 1,096

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 25

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 3

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 56

 52

 45

 66

 38

 31

 48

 3

 62

 31

 17

 17

 21

 41

 45

 17

 10

 10

 10

 14

 7

 17

 3

 17

 3

 10

 27

 7

 34

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .16

 .15

 .13

 .19

 .11

 .09

 .14

 .01

 .18

 .09

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .12

 .13

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .05

 .01

 .05

 .01

 .03

 .08

 .02

 .10

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .41

 .04

 .37

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .27

 .27

 .18

 .93

 .70

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .18

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -34.2 10,768 27,112 40 0 759 2.21 3.84

ACRE-FEET -34,200 21,358 53,777 79 0 1,505

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 53,777

SPILL 79

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 53,856

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.84

JULY 1, 2007 4.42

 1,461.1

Table 4

(1) (1)
### §468. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 468 was editorially reclassified as section 5111 of this title.
#### § 2462.1 Publication of notice of, and public hearings on, proposed classification.

The authorized officer shall publish a notice of his proposed classification in the Federal Register and an announcement in a newspaper having general circulation in the area or areas in the vicinity of the affected land. The notice shall include the legal description of the affected land, the law or laws under which the lands would be disposed of together with such other information as the authorized officer deems pertinent. Copies of the notice will be sent to the head of the governing body of the political subdivision of the State, if any, having jurisdiction over zoning in the geographic area within which the affected lands are located, the governor of that State and the BLM multiple use advisory board in that State, the land-use planning officer and land-use planning committees, if any, of the county, in which the affected lands are located, the authorized user or users of the lands or their selected representatives, all petitioner-applicants involved, and any other party the authorized officer determines to have an interest in the proper use of the lands. The authorized officer will hold a public hearing on the proposal if (a) the proposed classification will affect more than 25,000 acres or (b) he determines that sufficient public interest exists to warrant the time and expense of a hearing.