alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 498.68

 500.58

 500.27

 499.95

 499.60

 499.28

 499.48

 499.26

 498.91

 500.22

 499.95

 499.63

 499.75

 499.42

 499.08

 498.73

 500.17

 499.81

 499.52

 499.23

 500.25

 499.94

 499.77

 499.36

 500.00

 499.55

 499.86

 500.35

 499.71

 499.44

 500.03

 53,900

 55,932

 55,596

 55,250

 54,876

 54,535

 54,748

 54,513

 54,141

 55,541

 55,250

 54,908

 55,036

 54,684

 54,321

 53,952

 55,487

 55,100

 54,791

 54,481

 55,574

 55,239

 55,058

 54,620

 55,303

 54,823

 55,154

 55,682

 54,994

 54,705

 55,336

STORAGE

-252

+2,032

-336

-346

-374

-341

+213

-235

-372

+1,400

-291

-342

+128

-352

-363

-369

+1,535

-387

-309

-310

+1,093

-335

-181

-438

+683

-480

+331

+528

-688

-289

+631

CHANGE

131

1,266

74

68

56

70

354

132

67

953

108

75

307

68

61

57

1,019

57

96

97

806

85

162

55

632

39

963

1,180

113

193

737

INFLOW

 258

 241

 242

 241

 244

 241

 246

 249

 223

 247

 255

 246

 241

 242

 242

 242

 244

 251

 251

 251

 253

 254

 253

 274

 286

 280

 795

 913

 459

 338

 417

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 31

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 0

 0

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/25/2003

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,184 10,081 9,419 0 31 34

ACRE-FEET +1,184 19,996 18,683 0 61 67

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 18,683

SPILL 0 18,744

 54,152

OUTLET 61

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 48

 1,214

 48

 48

 48

 48

 318

 48

 48

 803

 48

 48

 263

 48

 48

 48

 987

 48

 48

 48

 786

 79

 156

 48

 583

 48

 945

 1,155

 116

 149

 729

 9,099

 18,048

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 320

 329

 323

 319

 309

 298

 292

 287

 277

 266

 267

 262

 256

 249

 239

 228

 223

 229

 225

 226

 239

 239

 251

 241

 242

 244

 243

 239

 235

 251

 242

 299

 295

 292

 289

 283

 276

 265

 260

 259

 250

 242

 230

 227

 221

 213

 207

 206

 204

 203

 205

 209

 206

 219

 222

 223

 217

 223

 221

 217

 214

 220

 307

 303

 302

 299

 292

 284

 277

 272

 267

 258

 257

 252

 244

 232

 223

 216

 215

 216

 214

 216

 222

 226

 234

 232

 233

 233

 233

 231

 224

 227

 231

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Exhibit 4.1





		 NUMBER ##### Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.SHARES ##### INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE $0.001 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK CUSIP00510M104 COMMON STOCK THIS CERTIFIES THAT* SPECIMEN * Is The Owner of##### FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF Acurx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Dated: ##/##/#### COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: VSTOCK TRANSFER, LLC Transfer Agent and Registrar By: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary 


 




     


     


    

		The follow ing abbreviation s, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations. Additi ona l abbreviations may also be used thou gh not in the above list. For value received, _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASEINSERT SOCIAL SECUR ITY OR OTl-IER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: (PLEA SE PRINT OR TYPEWRJT E NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZI P CODE, OF ASSIGN EE) of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint ------------------------------------·Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation withfull power of substitution in the premises. THE SIGNATURE TO Tl-llS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND \VITI-I Tl-IE NAME AS WRITfEN UPON Tl-IE FACE OF TlllS CERTIFICATE. Tl-IE SIGNATURE(S) MUST 13E GUA RANTEED 13Y AN ELIGIBLE GUA RANTOR INSTITUTION (13anks, S1ockbroke1<, Savings and Loan Associn1ions and Credi1Unions). SIGNATU R E GUARANTEED: TRANSFER FEE WILL APPLY
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                       

<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          317
<SECURITIES>                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                  6284
<ALLOWANCES>                    330
<INVENTORY>                    1093
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               7863
<PP&E>                        12286
<DEPRECIATION>                 9018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                25750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         10027
<BONDS>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0
<PREFERRED>                       0
<COMMON>                       8690
<OTHER-SE>                     4966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  25750
<SALES>                        7079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               7079
<CGS>                          4640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  6861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  78
<INCOME-TAX>                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               0
<DISCONTINUED>                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0
<CHANGES>                         0
<NET-INCOME>                     78
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0
        


</TABLE>
March 23 , 2015

Ms. Jacqueline C. Iacovelli

Property Manager

Virtual Homes Realty

1 Farraday Court

Palm Coast, FL 32137

Dear M s

. Iacovelli :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your J anuary 2 9 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of Virtual Homes Realty into

the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0256 0 , but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to co nsider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exempti on.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chester W. Carr, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Hill, P. J., Hefliernan, Brewster, Foster and Deyo, JJ. [See *ante.*p. 830.]
§ 30.128 What happens if an error in BIA's estate inventory is alleged? This section applies when, during a probate proceeding, an interested party alleges that the estate inventory prepared by BIA is inaccurate and should be corrected. ( a ) Alleged inaccuracies may include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Trust property should be removed from the inventory because the decedent executed a gift deed or gift deed application during the decedent's lifetime, and BIA had not, as of the time of death, determined whether to approve the gift deed or gift deed application;
( 2 ) Trust property should be removed from the inventory because a deed through which the decedent acquired the property is invalid;
( 3 ) Trust property should be added to the inventory; and
( 4 ) Trust property included in the inventory is described improperly, although an erroneous recitation of acreage alone is not considered an improper description.
( b ) When an error in the estate inventory is alleged, the OHA deciding official will refer the matter to BIA for resolution under 25 CFR parts 150, 151, or 152 and the appeal procedures at 25 CFR part 2. ( 1 ) If BIA makes a final determination resolving the inventory challenge before the judge issues a final decision in the probate proceeding, the probate decision will reflect the inventory determination.
( 2 ) If BIA does not make a final determination resolving the inventory challenge before the judge issues a final decision in the probate proceeding, the final probate decision will: ( i ) Include a reference to the pending inventory challenge; and
( ii ) Note that the probate decision is subject to administrative modification once the inventory dispute has been resolved.
[73 FR 67289, Nov. 13, 2008, as amended at 76 FR 7506, Feb. 10, 2011]
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

In the Matter of: SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FDMS Nos. FAA 2012-0868, 2012-0869, 

2012-0872, 2012-0873,2012-0874, 

2012-0904,2013-0617,2013-0619 

Served: October 16, 2015 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

Complainant served its appeal brief in this case on September 9, 2015, by mail. 

Consequently, under 14 C.P.R. §§ 13.233(e) and 13.211(e), Respondent's reply brief is due on 

October 19, 2015. 

By request dated October 14, 2015, Respondent's counsel is seeking a thirty-day 

extension of time to file its reply brief. Respondent's counsel represents that he has conferred 

with Complainant's counsel and that the parties have agreed to extend the time period for filing 

its reply brief. 

Respondent's request for an extension of time in which to file its reply brief is granted 

under 14 C.P.R. § 13.233(e)(1). Respondent's reply brief is now due to be filed on or before 

November 18,2015. 1 

MICHAEL P. HUERTA 

ADMINISTRATOR 

Federal Aviation Administration 

~-\)'~~ VICKI~~ LEEMON2 

Manager, Adjudication Branch 

1 The "mailing rule" (14 C.P.R. § 13 .211( e)), which provides for 5 additional days after service by mail, 

does not apply to this extension. 

2 Issued under authority delegated to the Chief Counsel and the Assistant Chief Counsel for Litigation by 

Memorandum dated October 27, 1992, under 49 U.S.C. § 322(b) and 14 C.P.R.§ 13.202 (see 57 Fed. 

Reg. 58,280 (1992)).
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2001 of
J. Allen  Greer,  Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2003
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
-------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CFO
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7543

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD WARDRICK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CR95-294, CA-99-3381-PJM) Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Lawrence Gibson, Jr., Riverdale, Maryland; Leonard L. Long, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. David Ira Salem, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Donald Wardrick seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wardrick , Nos. CR-95-294; CA-99-3381-PJM (D. Md. filed Aug. 1, 2001 & entered Aug. 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 725.720 How does a miner request vocational rehabilitation assistance?

Each miner who has been determined entitled to receive benefits under part C of title IV of the Act must be informed by OWCP of the availability and advisability of vocational rehabilitation services. If such miner chooses to avail himself or herself of vocational rehabilitation, his or her request will be processed and referred by OWCP vocational rehabilitation advisors pursuant to the provisions of §§ 702.501 through 702.508 of this chapter as is appropriate.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,322.80

 2,322.74

 2,322.70

 2,322.65

 2,322.61

 2,322.56

 2,322.53

 2,322.49

 2,322.54

 2,322.66

 2,322.90

 2,323.16

 2,323.85

 2,324.58

 2,325.10

 2,325.24

 2,325.31

 2,325.33

 2,325.32

 2,325.28

 2,325.28

 2,325.23

 2,325.20

 2,325.15

 2,325.17

 2,325.43

 2,325.62

 2,325.68

 2,325.67

 2,325.63

 2,325.60

 1,748.4

 1,747.6

 1,747.1

 1,746.4

 1,745.9

 1,745.2

 1,744.8

 1,744.3

 1,744.9

 1,746.5

 1,749.7

 1,753.2

 1,762.4

 1,772.1

 1,779.1

 1,781.0

 1,781.9

 1,782.2

 1,782.0

 1,781.5

 1,781.5

 1,780.8

 1,780.4

 1,779.8

 1,780.0

 1,783.5

 1,786.1

 1,786.9

 1,786.7

 1,786.2

 1,785.8

STORAGE

-0.5

-0.8

-0.5

-0.7

-0.5

-0.7

-0.4

-0.5

+0.7

+1.6

+3.2

+3.5

+9.2

+9.8

+7.0

+1.9

+0.9

+0.3

-0.1

-0.5

+0.0

-0.7

-0.4

-0.7

+0.3

+3.5

+2.6

+0.8

-0.1

-0.5

-0.4

CHANGE

425

300

412

293

375

326

493

383

895

1,457

2,106

2,411

5,128

5,391

4,584

2,185

1,724

1,207

1,185

952

1,186

718

977

958

1,326

2,901

2,385

1,674

1,199

1,074

1,062

INFLOW

 689

 693

 667

 624

 634

 657

 690

 650

 541

 650

 489

 645

 481

 469

 1,060

 1,232

 1,230

 1,051

 1,233

 1,223

 1,186

 1,057

 1,176

 1,293

 1,191

 1,130

 1,089

 1,267

 1,267

 1,329

 1,234

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 4

 8

 12

 4

 8

 4

 4

 0

 20

 4

 12

 23

 12

 0

 12

 4

 20

 20

 20

 0

 0

 0

 4

 4

 0

 8

 8

 0

 0

 16

 32

C.F.S.

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .05

 .01

 .03

 .06

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .41

 .37

 .20

 1.48

 1.44

 .38

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .41

 .12

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .26

 1.12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +37.3 47,692 28,827 0 0 263 .66 6.50

ACRE-FEET +37,300 94,597 57,178 0 0 522

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 57,178

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 57,178

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.50

JULY 1, 2006 12.42

 1,748.9

Table 4

(1) (1)
### §576. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 27, 1939, ch. 387, §6, 53 Stat. 1130, which related to purchase of lands and reimbursement of expenditures, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Earth Energy Reserves, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year end December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James E. Hogue, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/James E. Hogue
-----------------------------
James E. Hogue
Chief Executive Officer

January 10, 2007


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Earth Energy Reserves, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John M. Thompson, III, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

/s/John M. Thompson, III
-----------------------------
John M. Thompson, III
Chief Financial Officer

January 10, 2007
#### § 702.420 Issuance of authorization; binding effect upon insurance carrier.

The issuance of an authorization for treatment by the employer shall bind his insurance carrier to furnish and pay for such care and services.