alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.339 Exhaustion of administrative remedies. ( a ) A complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Act. Administrative remedies are exhausted if: ( 1 ) 180 days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint and DOI has made no finding with regard to the complaint; or
( 2 ) DOI issues any finding in favor of the recipient.
( b ) If DOI fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a finding in favor of the recipient, DOI will: ( 1 ) Promptly advise the complainant of this fact;
( 2 ) Advise the complainant of his or her right to bring a civil action for injunctive relief; and
( 3 ) Inform the complainant: ( i ) That he or she may bring a civil action only in a United States district court for the district in which the recipient is found or transacts business;
( ii ) That a complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney's fees, but that the complainant must demand these costs in the complaint;
( iii ) That before commencing the action the complainant shall give 30 days notice by registered mail to the Secretary of HHS, the Attorney General of the United States, the Secretary of the Interior, and the recipient;
( iv ) That the notice must state: the alleged violation of the Act; the relief requested; the court in which the complainant is bringing the action; and whether or not attorney's fees are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
( v ) That the complainant may not bring an action if the same alleged violation of the Act by the same recipient is the subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 497.49

 496.75

 495.99

 495.23

 494.47

 493.72

 492.87

 492.00

 491.10

 490.16

 489.23

 488.32

 487.73

 488.41

 489.05

 488.99

 489.50

 488.59

 487.69

 488.17

 489.03

 488.68

 488.95

 489.19

 489.45

 489.71

 489.17

 488.25

 488.64

 489.34

 52,657

 51,894

 51,119

 50,355

 49,600

 48,864

 48,039

 47,206

 46,358

 45,486

 44,638

 43,818

 43,292

 43,899

 44,474

 44,420

 44,884

 44,061

 43,257

 43,684

 44,456

 44,142

 44,384

 44,602

 44,838

 45,074

 44,584

 43,756

 44,106

 44,738

STORAGE

-791

-763

-775

-764

-755

-736

-825

-833

-848

-872

-848

-820

-526

+607

+575

-54

+464

-823

-804

+427

+772

-314

+242

+218

+236

+236

-490

-828

+350

+632

CHANGE

20

45

20

31

35

42

0

-3

-13

-30

-18

-4

141

714

705

386

645

-2

7

630

809

255

538

527

536

536

167

-6

588

730

INFLOW

 416

 418

 410

 414

 412

 411

 412

 415

 413

 410

 408

 407

 405

 407

 413

 412

 410

 411

 410

 412

 417

 412

 414

 415

 416

 416

 413

 410

 411

 411

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 3

 12

 1

 2

 4

 2

 4

 2

 2

 0

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 3

 3

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/14/2000

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -8,710 8,031 12,361 0 0 62

ACRE-FEET -8,710 15,929 24,518 0 0 123

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 24,518

SPILL 0 24,518

 53,448

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 126

 853

 443

 442

 771

 0

 0

 658

 775

 236

 547

 547

 547

 548

 274

 0

 581

 760

 8,108

 16,082

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
#### Beekman T. Burnham et al., Appellants, *v.*Matthew T. Brennan, Respondent.

Declarations by a vendor after sale and delivery of possession are not competent evidence as against the purchaser in an action wherein the sale is attacked as frauduleiit by the creditors of the vendor.

(Argued May 23, 1878;

decided June *4,*1878.)

This was an action of replevin.

Prior to the 10th day of January, 1873, William H. Lane owned the property in controversy, and on that day he sold an undivided half thereof to the plaintiff, Douglass, and on the fifteenth day of January he sold the other undivided half thereof to the plaintiff, Burnham. Thereafter, in April, one Griggs recovered and docketed a judgment against Lane, and on the fifteenth day of that month an execution was issued upon such judgment and delivered to the defendant *598as sheriff, who on the same day levied on and seized the property in question. The property was taken under the execution upon the claim that the transfer thereof by Lane to the plaintiff was fraudulent and void as to the creditors of Lane. On the twenty-ninth day of May, this action, was commenced by the plaintiff against the sheriff to recover the possession of the property thus seized, and the property was therein taken from the defendant and delivered to the plaintiffs. There was some controversy at the trial as to whether there was an actual-change of the possession of the' property at the time of the sale by Lane to the plaintiffs. There was evidence tending to negative such a change. But there was no evidence that Lane continued in possession after the commencement of this suit. On the trial one Pierson was called as a witness by the defendant, and gave evidence that on the 5th day of December, 1873, more than six months after the commencement of this action, he met Lane by appointment at the residence of his son, and there had a conversation with him, in which he stated that he and his son owned the property, that he was not able to take care of it, but that his son took charge of it, that it. was free and clear, and that he wanted to sell it; .and he named a price for which he would sell it. This evidence was objected to by plaintiffs, and the ■ objection was overruled. *Held,*error ; that the evidence was clearly incompetent. *(Guylev*v. McGartney, *40 N.*Y., 221; *Tilson*v. Terwilliger, 56 id., 273) ; also that it could not be said that this evidence was harmless, as, it was well calculated to influence the jury, and the judge in his charge called particular attention to it, and telling the jury that they were bound *to*consider it and give it its due weight, as one of the facts in the case.

*Nelson Smith*for appellants.

*Robert S. Green*for respondent.

Earl, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur, except Allen, J., absent.

Judgment reversed.
#### § 2547.7 Coordination with State and local governments.

At least 60 days prior to offering land for sale, the authorized officer shall notify the Governor of the State within which the lands are located and the head of the governing body of any political subdivision of the State having zoning or other land use regulatory jurisdiction in the geographical area within which the lands are located that the lands are being offered for sale. The authorized officer shall also promptly notify such public officials of the issuance of the patent for such lands.
Exhibit 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-208678) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-165065, 333-165566, 333-169272, 333-171231, 333-172069, 333-178664, 333-188517, 333-192806, 333-201386 and
333-208634) of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV of our report dated 14 March 2016 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 20-F.



PwC Bedrijfsrevisoren bcvba Represented
by/s/ Koen HensKoen Hens Bedrijfsrevisor
Sint-Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium 14 March 2016
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Morris Rothstein and Harry Bilt, Appellants.

Judgements affirmed. No opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
§ 3103.32 Minimum royalties. ( a ) A minimum royalty must be paid at the expiration of each lease year beginning on or after a discovery of oil or gas in paying quantities on the lands leased, except on unitized leases that lack production, the minimum royalty must be paid only on the participating acreage, at the following rates: ( 1 ) On leases issued on or after August 8, 1946, and on those issued prior thereto if the lessee files an election under section 15 of the Act of August 8, 1946, a minimum royalty of $1 per acre or fraction thereof in lieu of rental, except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section; and
( 2 ) On leases issued from offers filed after December 22, 1987, and on competitive leases issued after December 22, 1987, a minimum royalty in lieu of rental of not less than the amount of rental which otherwise would be required for that lease year.
( b ) Minimum royalties will not be prorated for any lands in which the United States owns a fractional interest and must be paid on the full acreage of the lease.
( c ) Minimum royalties and rentals on non-participating acreage must be paid to the ONRR.
( d ) The minimum royalty provisions of this section are applicable to leases reinstated under 43 CFR 3108.23.
( e ) If the royalty paid during any year aggregates to less than the minimum royalty, then the lessee must pay the difference at the end of the lease year.
(No. 1143

Claimant awarded $131.41.)

#### Illinois Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April*29, 1927.

*Service*— when *State liable for telephone service.*Where claimant furnishes telephone service to a department of the State, at the request of an authorized agent of the State, and the rates are the same as those charged to its regular subscribers, the State is liable for the service furnished.

Horace A. Young, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; David J. Kadyk, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration filed by the claimant in this case alleges that it is a corporation duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, and is engaged in a general public utility telephone business in the city of Chicago and elsewhere in the State of Illinois, and is authorized by its charter so to do; that on or about October 11, 1919, the State of Illinois, by its agent, Charles J. Boyd, then general superintendent of the Illinois Free Employment Office, 116 North Dearborn street, Chicago, Illinois, and whose present address is the same (the corporate name of which was the Chicago Telephone Company), in writing requested claimant to furnish telephone service to defendant at its office at 344 East 35th street, Chicago, Illinois; that claimant did furnish such telephone service from time to time as requested by defendant, at 344 East 35th street, Chicago, Illinois, and at 417 East 35th street, Chicago, Illinois; that the rates charged defendant are its lawful rates for its patrons and subscribers in and for its Chicago exchange; that at various times defendant paid various amounts as agreed; that there is a total unpaid balance due claimant of $131.41, and that same has not been paid because the appropriation therefor was exhausted.

A consent to the allowance of said claim, by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, same having been submitted to George B- Arnold, Director of the Department of Labor of the State of Illinois, was filed.

We accordingly award claimant the sum of $131.41.
§ 2561.0-8 Lands subject to allotment. ( a ) A Native may be granted a single allotment of not to exceed 160 acres of land. All the lands in an allotment need not be contiguous but each separate tract of the allotment should be in reasonably compact form.
( b ) In areas where the rectangular survey pattern is appropriate, an allotment may be in terms of 40-acre legal subdivisions and survey lots on the basis that substantially continuous use and occupancy of a significant portion of such smallest legal subdivision shall normally entitle the applicant to the full subdivision, absent conflicting claims.
( c ) Allotments may be made in national forests if founded on occupancy of the land prior to the establishment of the particular forest or if an authorized officer of the Department of Agriculture certifies that the land in the application for allotment is chiefly valuable for agricultural or grazing purposes.
( d ) Lands in applications for allotment and allotments that may be valuable for coal, oil, or gas deposits are subject to the regulations of § 2093.4 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, B. Hagen Saville, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/    B. HAGEN SAVILLEName:B. Hagen SavilleTitle:Chief Executive OfficerDateMarch 5, 2014
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 969

 937

 892

 946

 942

 958

 920

 966

 989

 1,021

 1,051

 1,037

 1,057

 1,065

 1,041

 992

 983

 975

 959

 1,002

 992

 919

 1,007

 987

 870

 919

 960

 885

 833

 784

 745

 798

 808

 751

 757

 801

 796

 740

 754

 778

 791

 817

 871

 894

 924

 835

 816

 782

 783

 780

 801

 775

 768

 801

 763

 724

 737

 728

 709

 681

 666

 623

 859

 856

 820

 863

 885

 864

 800

 866

 911

 934

 968

 956

 975

 992

 953

 912

 901

 872

 861

 916

 873

 841

 891

 837

 785

 812

 830

 770

 755

 710

 672

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 2568.92 [Reserved]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 694 515 588

2 566 495 532

3 595 467 520

4 765 507 616

5 867 551 662

6 948 636 818

7 979 701 885

8 975 627 841

9 978 550 753

10 929 536 698

11 957 605 828

12 1,040 660 911

13 1,050 715 949

14 1,071 819 981

15 958 629 804

16 774 647 699

17 839 658 738

18 966 715 825

19 991 656 822

20 973 627 774

21 953 632 793

22 879 683 757

23 816 626 671

24 818 617 698

25 840 654 723

26 827 648 703

27 808 660 714

28 763 647 697

29 710 630 665

30 691 647 663

31 678 651 667

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Union Island On Old River At Middle River 

Period: August 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
§ 30.223 What is a prehearing conference? Before a hearing, the judge may order the parties to appear for a conference to: ( a ) Simplify or clarify the issues;
( b ) Obtain stipulations, admissions, agreements on documents, understandings on matters already of record, or similar agreements that will avoid unnecessary proof;
( c ) Limit the number of expert or other witnesses to avoid excessively cumulative evidence;
( d ) Facilitate agreements disposing of all or any of the issues in dispute; or
( e ) Resolve such other matters as may simplify and shorten the hearing.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137565) pertaining to the 2006 Employee Restricted StockPlan of MCG Capital Corporation and MCG Capital Corporation 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of our reports dated February 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation andthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MCG Capital Corporation, included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

McLean, Virginia 

February 27, 2008
"richardastrust.com" <richard@astrust.com> 

08/24/2007 10:40 PM To

Margaret Sheppard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Julius Banks/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Dave 

Godwin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, george 

<georgew2@comcast.net>

cc

bcc

Subject

HCR188C

For Follow Up:

Normal Priority

History:

This message has been replied to.

Margaret:

On the recovery machine:

I spoke to a Mr Jerry Wander at Inificon in East Syracuse New York about 

the Vortex Recovery machine. I have just purchased one and was inquiring 

about it being suitable for HCR188C recovery. Mr Wander asked me about 

the pressure on HCR188C and pointed me to the ARI 740 1998. He said that 

HCR188C falls into a medium pressure category and the unit should be 

suitable for the recovery of my refrigerant. Once passed, all his company 

will do is submit to ARI about HCR188C pressure and then the recovery 

machine will be rated. 

This will happen with every other one that is in the market at this time 

which are all EPA approved.

You can verify this by calling him at 315 4341100.

Any appliance which has any refrigerant in the system must be recovered 

before disposal. Any automobile a/c refrigerant must be recovered. This 

is

an EPA ruling. As far as the recovery equipment goes, it will be 

certified 

when HCR188C is approved. This is what Mr Wander told me. He told me all 

recovery machines are made of high quality parts and can be used on many 

applications - the only difference is the pressure rating. Since HCR188C 

falls in medium pressure, he sees no problems even if it is hydrocarbon.

As far as recycling HCR188C, my personal opinion is with the small amount 

that is being used, it is not feasable. The charge rate is so small and 

some of the components are under 1% of the mixture and can be lost in the 

recycling process. When this happens the full effects of HCR188C will not 

be there yet it can still be used but in my opinion it will not be 100% 
effective.

As far as the EU goes, I see no merit in checking on what they do because 

in the US we already have a rule on all refrigerants being recovered even 

HCR188C with its low charge rate is no exception. I don't know if the EU 

has a recovery rule in effect but here in the US the rule applies to all 

refrigerants

Below you will find thew web site for the recovery machine in question 

and 

attached the ARI 740 1988

Richard

http://www.inficonrefrigerantrecovery.com/en/vortexrefrigerantrecovery.ht

ml

Richard Maruya

phone 808 2351890 

fax 808 235 0116

cell 808 5614688

e mail richard@maruya.net or richard@astrust.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged 

information, if you are not the intended recipient, or the person 

responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, then 

please notify us by return e-mail immediately. Should you have received 

this e-mail in error then you should not copy this for any purpose nor 

disclose its contents to any other person.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 810

 939

 911

 832

 812

 829

 755

 759

 718

 686

 659

 628

 646

 649

 629

 618

 612

 606

 521

 429

 390

 360

 342

 333

 342

 327

 322

 324

 320

 299

 709

 742

 769

 743

 762

 726

 710

 676

 648

 638

 612

 592

 601

 627

 580

 581

 582

 531

 425

 383

 352

 346

 291

 292

 286

 304

 283

 296

 295

 281

 766

 816

 846

 772

 779

 771

 732

 741

 696

 661

 630

 611

 619

 638

 608

 608

 597

 585

 467

 410

 371

 353

 328

 308

 329

 315

 310

 312

 308

 290

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 766

 1,582

 2,428

 3,200

 3,979

 4,750

 5,482

 6,223

 6,919

 7,580

 8,210

 8,821

 9,440

 10,078

 10,686

 11,294

 11,891

 12,476

 12,943

 13,353

 13,724

 14,077

 14,405

 14,713

 15,042

 15,357

 15,667

 15,979

 16,287

 16,577

 766

 791

 809

 800

 796

 792

 783

 778

 769

 758

 746

 735

 726

 720

 712

 706

 699

 693

 681

 668

 654

 640

 626

 613

 602

 591

 580

 571

 562

 553

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER