A11107 365633

<* PJV

TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE

PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY

COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM

FOR PAPER

REPORT NO. 65S

STRENGTH TESTS

-GC

100

. 1)56

80-1840

1980

D.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Bureau of Standards
NBS COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAMS

TAPPI Paper and Board (6 times per year)

Bursting strength

Tearing strength

Tensile breaking strength

Elongation to break

Tensile energy absorption

Folding endurance

Stiffness

Air resistance

Grammage

Smoothness

Surface pick strength

K S N ink absorption

Moisture content

Opacity

Blue reflectance (brightness)

Specular gloss, 75°

Thickness

Concora (flat crush)

Ring crush

FKBG-APl Containerboard (48 times per year)

Mullen burst of linerboard

Concora test of medium

MCCA Color and Appearance (4 times per year)

Gloss at 60°

Color and color difference

CTS Rubber (4 times per year)

Tensile strength, ultimate elongation and tensile stress

Hardness

Mooney viscosity

Vulcanization properties

ASTM Cement (2 times per year)

Chemical (11 chemical components)

Physical (15 characteristics)

AASHTO Bituminous

Asphalt cement (2 times per year)

Cutbacks (once a year)

NBS Collaborative Reference Programs

A05' Technology Building

National Bureau of Standards

Washington, DC 20234

Rev. 10/79
TECHNICAL ASSOCIATION OF THE

PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY

Kattonal Bureau of Standard;

library, E-01 Afimin. BWp

DEC 4 1980

Obi glcc -Qjd

/ i /

8b- !2<4o

/4gC)

COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM

FOR PAPER

Report No. 65S

STRENGTH TESTS

R. G. Powell

CTS-NBS Research Associate

Collaborative Testing Services, Inc.

J. Horlick

Office of Testing Laboratory Evaluation Technology

Office of Engineering Standards

National Engineering Laboratory

NBSIR 80-1840 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Bureau of Standards

INTRODUCTION

Imports 65S and 65G comprise the fifth set of re

for the 79-80 program year. Participants in tes

which involve strength properties of paper will

only the S report; those in teets which measure

properties sill receive only the G report.

ports

ts

receive

other

Notes and comments to individual laboratories

Values” applicable to a particular method are

following Table i for each method. See page

report for an explanation of "lest Values",

not confuse these Best Values with provisiona

included with the sanples to detect serious d

at the time of test.

and "Best

given

1 of this

Please do

1 values

i screpancie

If there are any questions on the notes, the analyses,

or the reports in general, contact Robert G. Powell or

Jeffrey Horlick on 301/921-2946.

Jeffrey Horlick, Administrator

NBS-TAPPI Collaborative Vefererce Program

Office of Testing laboratory E\aluation technology

September 3, l
TAPPI-NBS COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In 1969, the National Bureau of Standards and the Technical Association of the Pulp and

Paper Industry established a collaborative reference program to provide a participating

laboratory with a means to check periodically the level and uniformity of its testing in

comparison with that of other laboratories.

The interchange of paper and board products and of the raw materials for these products

requires agreement among raw material suppliers, paper and board producers, converters,

distributors, retailers, commercial testing laboratories, user organizations and the

ultimate consumer as to the meaning of test results, an agreement that cannot be achieved

without accurate and precise testing. This program is designed to help assure agreement.

HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS

Participants Select the Tests in which they wish to participate. This choice is made on

joining the program, but additional tests may be added at any time. Also new participants

may enter the program at any time.

Test Samples are Distributed Bimonthly; i.e. every 2 months.

Provisional Values are Provided with the Samples for one or both of the test levels, depend

ing on method. The provisional values permit serious discrepancies to be detected without

delay. (It is left to the discretion of the laboratory supervisor as to whether these

values should be known to the operator.)

Each Participant Tests the Samples , following instructions provided for each test method.

The full check on a single instrument should normally take no more than 30 minutes. The

test results are then sent to NBS for analysis. The participant is also asked to report

other information relevant to an accurate analysis, such as test conditions and the instruments used.

Industry Means, Best Values and Other Statistics are developed from the data by NBS. The

best values are estimates based on a careful examination of all data, both current and past

with special attention to results obtained by the National Bureau of Standards and other

recognized reference laboratories in this and other countries.

A Quick Report is Prepared for each participating laboratory reporting data on time. This

report shows the industry mean values, and the deviations of the laboratory's results from

these values for each test method.

A Longer Summary Report, Showing the Data from all Participants, is also prepared. In

the summary report, of which this report is an example, each laboratory is identified by

a code number so that the information is maintained on a confidential basis. However,

instruments are identified by type so participants can compare their results with

those obtained on similar instruments of different manufacture. This report includes

test averages, best values and standard deviations for individual participants and for

the group as a whole. A participant should be able to readily determine the level and

variability of his results in comparison with those of the other laboratories.

Repeatability and Reproducibility Statements such as Contained In ASTM, TAPP I and ISO

Standards are included at the end of the report. Participants can check their performance level against the precision statement given in the test method or specification.

ii
TABLE 6F CONTENTS

Analyses In This Report

PAGE

i 11

Iv

13

e9

11

12

17

19

20

22

23

28an23

26

28

40

43

45

se

32

Introduce ion

Dtacrlo+lon of Program

Metric Conversion Table

Key to Tables and Graphs

40-1 Air Resistance, Gurley 3il type

40-

2 Air Resistance, Sheffield type

41-

1 Air Resistance, Gurley Mercury type

44-

1 Smoothness, Parker Printsurf

45-

1 Smoothness, Sheffield type

45-2 Smoothness, Bekk type

47-1 Smoothness, Bendtsen type

53-1 Moisture

56-1 KAN Ink Absorption

60-1 Opacity, White (89%) Backing* Fine papers

60-

2 Opacity, Paper Sacking, Elrepho type. Fine papers

61-

1 Opacity, White (89%) Backing, Ness Paper

65-1 Blue Reflectance (Brightness), Directional

65-2 Blue Reflectance, Diffuse, Elrepho (Gloss Trap)

65-3 Blue Reflectance, Diffuse, Elrepho (No Gloss Trap)

75-

1 Specular Gloss, 75 degree. High Range

76-

1 Specular Gloss, 75 degree. Lot range

90-1 Thickness (Caliper)

95-1 Grammage (Basis Weight)

Summary

Analyses In The S Report

10-1

10-2

1 1-1

15-

1

16-

1

19-

1 20

-

1 20-2

25-

1

26-

1 28-1

29-

1

30-

1 30-2

35-

1

36-

1

49-

1

50-

1 91-1

96-1

Printing Papers,

Printing Papers,

Packaging Papers

Printing Papers

Bursting Strength - Up to 45 psi

Bursting Strength - Up to 45 psi. Air Clamps

Bursting Strength - Up to 100 psi

Tearing Strength - Printing Papers

Tearing Strength - Packaging Papers

Tensile Breaking Strength - Packaging Papers

Tensile Breaking Strength

Tensile Breaking Strength

Tensile Energy Absorption

Tensile Energy Absorption

Elongation to Break - Packaging Papers

Elongation to Ereak - Printing Papers

Folding Endurance, MIT type

Folding Endurance, MIT type, log (base 10)

Stiffness, Gurley

Stilfness, Taber

Surface Pick Strength, IGT

Surface Pick Strength, Warn Concora (Flat Crush)

Ping Crush

CPE

Pendulum

lii
TABLE OF CONVERSION FACTORS TO METRIC (SI) UNITS

Physical

Quantity

To Convert

From To

Multiply

by

Bursting strength psi kPa 6.895

kg/cm2 kPa 98.07

bar kPa 100.00

Tearing strength g mN 9.807

Tensile strength lb/ in. kN/m .1751

lb/ 0.5 in. kN/m .3502

lb/15 mm kN/m .2965

kg/15 mm kN/m .6538

kg/ 25 mm kN/m .3923

kg/mm kN/m 9.807

Tensile energy absorption ft-lb/ft

2 J/m2 14.59

in. -lb/ in.

2 J/m2 175.1

kg-m/m2J/m2 9.807

Bending stiffness g. cm yN*m 98.07

Flat-crush strength (Concora) lb N 4.448

Ring-crush (TAPPI) lb N 4.448

(ISO) lb/6.00 in. kN/m 0.0292

Thickness mil ym 25.40

iv
KEY T* TABLES AND GRAPH

MEAN -

GRAND MEAN -

( gr. MEAN )

HD «F NEARS -

( SD MEANS ) DEV -

K. DEV -

SDR -

AVERAGE SE° -

®. SD? -

VAR -

F -

X -

M - S -

Best values -

CflflRD’NATES -

95% ELLIPSE -

AVG 5. ?D? -

The average of Individual TEST DETERMINATIONS. Ths number of TEST DETERMINATIONS In

the assn Is given in ths upper right ecrnir of -ths first tsbls (TEST D. ) and again at the Pottos of this tafils. Ths average of ths Individual laboratory MEAN9, excluding laboratorias flagged (sea

eoluan F) with an X, 0 , or . The GRAND MEAN is ° * in US custoaary units and.

where applicable, in SI metric units.

The standard deviation of the laboratory MEANS about the GSAND MEAN; an index of the

amcng-laboratory precision.

The deviation or difference of the laboratory MEAN froa the GRAND MEAN.

The normal deviate or ratio of the DEV to the SD OF MEANS; an Indication of the degree of divergence of the laboratory MEAN froa the GRAND MEAN. AN. DEV of sore than

2 or less than -2 may indicate that the participant la not following the procedure

considered standard tor this analysis.

The standard deviation of repeated measurements; that is, of Individual test determieations about their MEAN.

The average of the Individual laboratory SDK's; an Index of the elthi n-laboratory

precision of repeated measurements.

The relative standard deviation of repeated measurements; that is, the ratio of the SDR to the AVERAGE SDR: an indication of the ability of a participant to repeat his or har xeaeurements relativa to the average ability. The greater the number of TEST

DETERMINATIONS the closer the R. SDR should be to unity. If R. SDR la outside the

Halts given below, the participant may not be following the procedure considered

standard lor this analysis:

No. of test Determinations

3

4

5

a 10

is2025

Code for Instrument

Flag, with following mean

Lower limit

for B. SDR

9. OS

o . x e 0.26

e .40

0 .40 0.56

0 .61 0.65

r variation in condlti

og :

Upper limit

for R. SDR 2.59

2.25

2.06

1.T7

1 .67 1.53

1.45

1.39

n. see second table.

Included in grand mean and inside 95% error alliose.

Included in grand means but plotted point falls outside of the 95% error ellipse.

The participant should take this as a warning to reexamine his or her testing procedure.

Excluded because plotted point eould fall outside of the 99% error ellipse. ( e<« oege

2 for explanation of Graph).

Excluded because data were not understood or because of a non— coded variation reported by the laboratory. (See the notes following Table 1 for each method).

Excluded from grand means because VAR wae non-standard for tha analysis.

Excluded because data for one sample are sissing.

Included In grand mean but only after omission of one or more 'wild'* values; that is test daters ina t ions mors than 3 times AVERAGE SDR from the laboratory's MEAN. Not mere than 20% of the teat determination may ba excluded in this manner without rejecting the laboratory.

Given at the end of Table 1 for each method for which sufficient Information is available. These best values are eatlmatss based on a careful examination of all data. both current and past, with special attention to results obtained by the National

Bureau of Standards and other recognized reference laboratorias in this and other

countries. All participants using equipment that Is standard for the analysis should

be able to achieve results within the plus-minus ( •/- ) lieits, when these are shown

along with the best values.

Distances along major and minor axes of error ellipse. If special additive or con- current modal of the measuring process applies to this method, the distance along the

minor axis represents the random error within a laboratory while that along the major

axis also Includes a systematic laboratory component of error. Lengths of the major and minor axes of the ellipse and the angle that the major axis

makes with the horizontal axle.

Average of the P. 3DR for the two samples; an Indication of the laboratory's precision of repeated measurements.

1
Graph -

SUMMARY - (At end of report)

SEPT- CEP -

PE PL TAFPI -

®EPEA'r -

FEPFOD -

For each laboratory the MEAN for the second sample Is plotted

the first sample, with each point reoresentlnt a laboratory,

tical lines are the GRAND MEANS. The dashed line is drain at sloping line, ehich may or may not lie close to the 45 degree

Jor axis of the error ellipse. The ellipse is drawn so that,

include S5K of the points representing the laboratories.

Plotted symbols are as explained above (under F ), except that

fl 1 , A participant whose plotted point falls outside of the ellipse should carefully

reexamine the testing procedure he or she is following.

The graph la plotted with an ellipse when there are 20 or more laboratories in the analysis. then there are 10 through 1° laboratories in tbe analysis, the graph is plotted but tbe ellipse is omitted. then there are fewer than 10 laboratories re- tained in the analysis, the graph is not plotted.

The Internet ional System of Units (ST) Is used on the plots whsrever possible to aid

participants in f ami l i ari zing themselves aitb SI. Grand means in SI units ars given

at the top of the plot, and supplementary scales in SI units are drawn along the axes allowing the reader to compare means and variability in common units and SI units for

the same data.

In addition to several quantities already defined above, the summary shows the following values for each teat method:

The number of replicate test determinations used in this Collaborative Reference Program.

The number of replicate test determinations in a test result required by the applicable TAPPI Official Test Method or assumed here if tbere is no TAPFI Official Test Method. This quantity is needed in the computation of TAPPI repeatability and reproducibility from the SD OF MEANS and the AVERAGE SD5. See TAPPI Official Test Method T1206 for definitions and computations.

TAFPI repea tabi lity i a measure of the with! n-laboratory precision of a test rssult. TAFPI reproducibility; a measure of the between-lahoratory precision of a test re- sult.

against the MEAN for The horizontal and ver45 degrees. The solid

line, is along the maon the average, it will

an *S I is plotted as an

2
rRO«T va. oSS TAPPT C0LLAB0RATI VB REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980

ANALYSTS T10-1 TABLE t BURSTING STRENGTH, P9I TAPPI OFFICIAL TE9T METHOD T403 0S-?6. PERKINS M0DEL C PAMPLE C GATED 8PPSBT BOOK SAMPLE NEWSPRINT TEST D. • 15

T AU 034 75 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER G45 66 GRAMS1 PER SQUARE METER

''PDE MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

11 21 19.03 i .re .81 1.27 1.C9 49.20 36.71 68.39 2.88 3.95 IOC * L 121

LI 34 1 7 .

** 3 -.30 -.24 .56 .51 12.47 -.03 -.05 .44 .60 IOC 4 L 134

L 1 50 1 = .30 1.27 1.02 1.03 .94 13.00 .51 .94 1.07 1 .46 ioc 6 IIS'* ’153 IS. 73 1.70 1.37 1 .39 1.26 12.59 .09 .17 .86 1.18 IOC 4 1. 153

'

l 5fe 20.20 2. IT 1.75 1.37 1.25 12.14 -.35 -.66 .35 .48 IOC 4 I 15?

I 1 6’ l 7 ,66 -.35 -.28 .64 .58 47.34 34.85 64.92 .98 1 .34 IOC » 1 16T

T 1 53 18.27 .23 .19 1.05 .95 12.21 -.28 -.52 .51 .70 ioc 8 L183

'191 l*7 . O'7 -.97 -.78 1.18 1.07 12.59 .10 .19 1.02 1 .40 IOC 0 t 191

T 20** 18. 8Y .83 .67 .83 .76 13.44 .95 1.76 .68 .93 ioc 4 L 2C t

7212 18.00 -.03 -.03 1.04 .94 12.67 .17 .32 .75 1 .02 IOC 0 L 2 1 2

T 223A 1 T .51 -.52 -.42 1.35 1.23 12.22 -.27 -.51 .70 .95 IOC a L 223 A

* 225 19 .6' 1.5? 1.26 1.65 1.50 12.83 .34 .63 .99 1 .35 ioc a 1 225

L232 17.63 -.40 -.32 .81 .74 13.29 .79 1.48 1 .36 1 .87 IOC 4 L232

! 2 3" A 18.93 .90 .73 .80 .73 12.93 .44 .82 .59 .81 ioc 0 L 23T A

T 23TB 18.6? .63 .51 .72 .66 12.60 .11 .20 .51 .69 ioc 0 L23TB

•.2»? 15. S*7 -2. *6 -1.66 .91 .33 12.39 -.11 -.20 .58 .80 IOC 0 L 249

’.26 1 18.24 .21 . 17 • 30 .72 12.58 • C 9 .16 .63 .86 1„C 0 126 1 1.264 13.4T .43 .35 .74 .63 13.05 .56 1.04 .77 l .05 KC 0 1264

L 2* 4 IT. 63 -.40 -.32 .6* .58 12.31 -.19 -.35 .55 .76 IOC 0 L2T4

12"? 15.43 -2.60 -2.10 1 .45 1.32 1 1 .43 -1.0? - 1.99 .62 .85 IOC a L 27 c

* 305 1-.3T -.6? -.54 .83 .76 13.66 1.16 2.17 .41 .56 IOC 0 ^3^5

'312 iT.e? -.16 -.13 .82 .75 12.38 -.1 1 -.21 .37 .50 IOC a L 31 2

'.315 1 9 . 0 T 1.03 .33 1.67 1.52 12.60 .1 1 .20 1 .05 1 .44 IOC 0 L 3 1 5 '321 1S.T3 1 . T 0 1 .3’ 1 .03 .94 10.00 -2.49 -4.65 .65 .90 ioc X 1321

1326 19.37 1 .33 1.08 1.23 1.12 1 1 .S3 -.97 -1.80 1 .02 1 .40 IOC a 1326

'330 17.97 — • o? -.05 1.39 1.26 12. 09 -.41 -.76 1 .23 1 .69 IOC a L 330

’ 323 I’. 73 -.30 -.24 1.62 1.48 1 1 .8? -.63 -1.17 • 64 .88 rc 0 1333

' 339 12. 6<* -5.43 -4.38 .74 .63 9.11 -4.33 -8.16 .75 1 .02 IOC * 1339

'.3 44 16.59 -1.45 -1. IT 1,18 1.C8 12.83 .34 .63 1.25 1 . t 1 IOC 0 1344

T 3 56 18.TC- .67 .54 1 .06 .96 12.09 -.40 -.75 .49 .67 ICC a 1 356

T 358 18.67 .63 .51 .94 .85 12.60 .11 .20 .56 .7? IOC 0 1358

T 36' 18.67 .63 .51 .92 . 84 12.69 .2" .37 .52 .72 IOC 0 L36C

T 366 17. OT -.07 -.05 1.11 1.01 11.61 -.38 -1.64 .59 .80 IOC 0 1366

L3 66 18. T6 .73 .59 1 .83 1.67 13.49 1.00 1.86 .94 1 .29 IOC 0 L3?6

1568 15. I’ -2.87 -2.31 1.49 1.35 1 1 .34 -1.15 -2.15 .5? .77 l^C » 156?

t 5' 3 12.68 -5.35 -4.32 .93 . 84 46.71 24.21 63.74 1 .85 2.53 IOC * L57 3 15 8 2 15.27 -2.83 -2.28 1 .33 1.21 12.56 .07 .12 .84 1.15 IOC 0 L582

159? 13.2T .24 . 19 .70 .64 12.73 .23 .43 .90 1.23 IOC 0 159?

1625 18, 7T .’3 .59 l.C-2 .92 12.79 • 30 .55 .58 .79 IOC 0 1625

7.6 8 4 19.60 1.57 1.26 .91 .83 12.21 -.29 -.53 .44 .61 IOC 0 1684

' 6? 6 19.31 1.28 1 . 33 1 ."2 . 93 53.00 40.5 1 75.4? 3.68 5.04 IOC * L 696

T. "36 16.66 -1 .3T -1.11 1 .45 1.31 12.29 -.20 -.37 .71 .98 IOC 0 1’36

T "44 13. 3T .33 .27 1.04 .95 43.23 30.74 57.27 2.81 3.85 IOC * rs’ 16.83 -1.20 -.9? .82 .74 12.10 -.39 -.73 .69 .94 IOC 4 17ST

1759 18.7? .73 .59 1 .54 1 .40 12.57 .07 .14 . 8C 1 .10 IOC 0 L?59

GP. MEAN • 18.03 PSI GRAND MEAN * 12.49 PSI TEST DETERMINATIONS - 15 ?D MEAV S • 1.24 PST SD OF MEANS - .54 PSI 38 LABS IN GPAND MEANS

AVERAGE SDR * 1.10 PSI AVEPAGE SDR • .73 PST

r,". we ay *124.33 XIL0PASCAL GRAND MEAN • 96.14 5IL0PASCAL

1128 18.60 .57 .46 1.30 1.18 50.40 37.9 1 70.62 2.23 3.05 10B 1128

121? 21.51 3.4a 2.81 1.41 1.28 13.99 1 .49 2.78 .57 .78 10T 12 1 0

T 242 19. T3 1 .70 1.37 1 .01 .92 12.58 .08 .15 .62 .85 10*r L 24 2 12 SOL 16.29 - 1 .T4 -1.41 .90 .82 l l .53 -.96 -1.79 .67 .92 ION L2SPL

1260 16.95 -1.08 -.87 .98 .89 11.91 - .58 -1.08 .49 .67 10A * L 260

' 26 = 22.13 4.10 3.31 .83 .76 26.20 13.71 25.54 1.42 1.95 1CA 1269

L46 4 10.66 — 7. 37 -5.95 .15 . 1 4 10.11 -2.39 -4.45 .03 .04 10M 1484

17 0 2 16.43 -1.60 -1 . 29 1.51 1.37 12.95 .46 .36 .64 .88 10X 170 2

T " 0 4 18.33 .30 .24 3.56 3.23 12.21 -.28 -.53 1 .57 2.16 10L L7C4

T.**C6 13.03 -5.00 -4.03 .89 .90 1 i .0“ -.43 -.80 .63 .86 10X L706

TOTAL NUMBE? 0F IAB0RAT4RIES REPORTING • 55

Best values: C34 18.2 ± 2.1 psi G45 12.5 ± 0.9 psi

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: ]?l

167, 339, 573, 696, 744.
-? EP<*o- vf). 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 198'’ ANALYST 51 T10-1 ABLE 2 BURSTING STRENGTH . PSI ’APPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T403 OS-76. PERKINS MODEL C

’ AB MFANS COORDINATES

'-'*DF F C34 G45 MAJ6 P MINOR

T

. 48 4 10.66 10.11 -7.64 -1.27

13 39 ¥ 12.60 8.11 -6.02 -3.53

T 5*’3 ¥ 12.63 46 .71 -.25 34.63

L7C6 13.03 12.07 -5.01 .31 L56P * 15.17 1 1 .34 -3.00 -.72

1582 e» 15.20 12.56 -2.79 .48

12 "9 ft 15.43 11.43 -2.73 -.67

12 49 ft 15.87 12 .39 -2.05 .20

12 501 16.29 11.53 -1.87 -.69

1" 02 16.43 12.95 -1.51 .69

I 344 ft 16.59 12.83 -1.38 .55

1 ? 36 fi 16.66 12.29 -1.39 .00

T 75“ ft 16.33 12.10 -1.24 -.21

12 60 16.95 11.91 -1.15 -.41

T 191 ft 17. 07 12.59 -.94 .24

130 5 ft 17 .37 13.66 -.49 1.25 122 3A ft 1- .51 12.22 -.55 -.19

12" 4 ft 17.63 12.31 -.42 -,13

T 23 2 ft 17.63 13.29 -.28 .34 1167 ¥ 17. &e 47.34 4.7C 34.52

r l 34 ft 17 . 73 12.47 -.30 .02

T 333 ft 17.73 11 . 8 ’ -.39 -.59

1312 17.67 12.39 -.17 -.09

13 66 1** .97 11.61 -.20 -.86

r 330 <* 17. go- 12.00 -.13 -.39

T 2 1 2 ft 18. 00 12.67 -.71 .18

126 1

ft 18.24 12.58 .22 .06 1163 18.27 12.21 .19 -.31

' 599 18.2’ 12.73 .27 .20

17 04 18 .33 12.21 .26 -.33

T "44 ¥ 18.37 43.23 4.86 30.35

T 264 ft 18. 47 13.05 .51 . 49 1128 18.60 50.40 6.15 37.41

T 360 18.67 12.69 .66 .10

T 358 1 8 .67 12.60 .64 .01

T 23" 3 A 18.6’ 12.6C .64 .01 1356 18 .’0 12.09 .60 -.49

T 386 18 .'6 13.49 .37 .83

1" 58 <1 18. 77 12.57 .74 -.04

’ 6 25 18.77 12.79 .77 .18 *2 0

- 18.37 13.44 .96 .81

12 3* A

ex 18 .83 12.93 .96 .30 1121 ¥ 19.03 49.20 6.40 36.16

13 15 ft 18.07 12.60 1 .04 -.05

1150 ft 19 .30 13.00 1.33 .31 1696 ¥ 19 .31 53.00 ’.24 39.88

13 26 ft 19.37 11.53 1.18 -1.15

16 5 4 ft 19.60 12.21 1.51 -.51 L225 ft 18.60 12.83 1 .60 .10

T 242 19.73 12.58 1 .69 -.17

1153 ft 19.73 12.59 1.70 -. 16 13 21 X 19.73 10.00 1 .3 1 -2.72

11 58 20.20 12.14 2.09 -.67

12 1 9 21.51 13.09 3.66 .96

I 269 * 22.13 26.20 6.08 12.95

ovrr A" c* . 18.03 12.49

95% ELLIPSE: 3.24 1.32

AVO S.SDK VAR PROPERTY—-TEST INS!TRT

.09 10M BUP.9TTVG STRENGTH 10 TO

.85 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .69 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.83 10X BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1.06 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1.18 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .08 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.31 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.87 ION BURSTING strength 10 -0

1 .13 10X BURSTING STRENGTH 10 70

l .40 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH to TO 1.15 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.84 1 oc BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.78 10A BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .24 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.66 IOC BUP STING STRENGTH 10 TO

1.09 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.67 IOC BURSTING strength 10 TO

t .30 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.96 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.56 ICC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1.19 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.63 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 7fl .91 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 -o

1 .*7 10c bursting strength 10 TO

.98 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.79 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 70

.83 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.93 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO 2.70 10L BURSTING strength 10 TO

2.40 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.86 1 oc BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO 2.12 1 03 BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.78 IOC BURSTI NG STRENGTH 10 TO

.81 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 1 0 70

.68 ICC BUPSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.81 IOC BURSTING STRENGTH 1 0 TO

1 .48 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 70

1 .25 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 70

.86 1 oc BUR-STING STRENGTH to TO

.84 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.77 10c BURSTI NG STRENGTH 10 TO 2.52 1 oc BURSTING strength 1 0 70

1 .48 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 70

1 .20 1 oc BURSTING STRENGTH 10 T0

2.98 10c BUPSTING strength 1 0 -o

1 .26 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.72 1 oc BURSTING STRENGTH 1 0 70

1 .43 1 oc BURSTING STRENGTH 10 70

.88 10T BUPSTING STRENGTH 1 0 TO

1 .22 10c BURSTI NG STRENGTH 10 TO

.92 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.86 10c BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .03 10T BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .35 1 0 A BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .00 WITH GAMMA • 8 DEGREES

1 CONDITIONS

40 PSI.EEGMED MT/MOT, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI . PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI

:

GIVE INSTP. MAKE, MODEL , CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI. PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI .LH6 MAPGY,, MAN.CLAMP, 20C , 65%RH

40 PSI

:

GIVE IVSTR. MAKE, MODEL, CLAMP

40 PSI. PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI. PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI , PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS A, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI. PERKINS MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS n MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PST, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 P9I

,

PERKT NS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI , PEPSINS C, MANUAL CLAM®

40 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAM"

40 PSI , PERKINS LC, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PST, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI , PERKTNS C, MANUAL '"LAM P 40 PSI, PERKINS 3. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKTNS MANUAL CLAMP

40 ®3I , PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKTNS c. manual CLAMP

40 PSI , PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKTNS <1 MANUAL CLAM®

40 PST, PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI. PERKXNS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI , PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI , PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS 0 . MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI . PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI. L*W, MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI , PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI , PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS c. MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI, L* W , MANUAL CLAMP

40 PSI. PERKINS A. MANUAL CLAMP

4
KIL0P

ASCRL

BURSTING STRENGTH » MODEL C

SAMPLE G34 = 18-0 PS I SAMPLE G34 = 124.3 K I L0PASCAL

SAMPLE G4S

SAMPLE G45

12.5 PSI

86.1 K I LOPASCAL

90 95 105 1 15 125 135 145 155

KIL0PRSCAL

5
FEPORT N8. 65 S TAPPI C8LLAB8RATI VE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL ISPS' ANALYSIS TIO-2 TABLE 1 BURSTING STRENGTH, PSI -APPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD '"403 OS-76, PERKINS MODEL C-A OR C WITH AIR OR HYDRAULIC CLAMPS

SAMPLE C9ATED OFFSET BOOK SAMPLE NEWSPRINT TEST D.- 15

I AB G34 75 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER G45 66 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

<~P0E MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

LI OS 18, T2 .41 .27 1.52 1.4S 1 1 .22 -1.14 -2.01 .72 1.11 1CD • L 105

f 1

’ 6C 17.93 -.37 -.24 1.10 1.05 48.57 36.20 63.65 3.12 4.78 10D * L106C

LI 15 18.67 .36 .23 1.C3 1.04 12.51 .15 .26 .57 .88 10D 0 L 1 1 5 MIS 19.95 1.64 1.07 .78 .75 12.43 .37 .12 .53 .81 10D 8 L 1 1 8 LI 25 16.57 -1.74 -1.13 2.04 1.95 12.79 .43 .76 1.01 1 .35 10D 0 L 1 25

1141 18.80 .49 .22 1.10 1.0S 12.64 .28 .49 .61 .94 10D 8 L 14

1

l 1 4P 19.47 1.16 .76 .83 .80 13.20 .84 1.47 .68 1 .03 10D 8 L 1 48

T

1 55 21.40 3.09 2.02 .89 .as 12.54 .16 .31 .74 1.14 10D 8 L 1 55 LIST 19.47 1.16 .76 .83 .80 12.83 .46 .82 .48 .73 10D 8 LIS’

LI 5 C 16.00 -2.3 1 -1.50 1 .38 1.32 12.02 -.34 -.60 .66 l .02 10 D 8 L 1 59

LI 62 17 .00 -1.31 -.85 1 .00 .96 11.20 -1.16 -2.05 .56 .86 10 D 9 L 162

1.1 63 17.37 -.94 -.61 .72 .69 12.47 .11 .19 .60 .92 10D 8 L 163

LI 66 19.97 1 .66 1 .08 1.23 1.18 12.91 .55 .97 .43 .65 10D 8 L 166 Ll"6 18.33 . 03 .02 1.11 1.06 12.20 -.16 -.29 .54 .83 10D 8 L 176

L l c 5 19.53 1.23 .80 .93 .89 12.39 .03 .05 .63 .97 1 OD 8 T 135

: i = 4 1~.47 -.84 -.55 .97 .93 46.43 34.07 59.90 2.18 3.33 10D • L 1 94

12 1“ " 18.73 .43 .28 1.16 1.11 12.19 -.18 -.31 .82 1 .26 10F 8 L2 1

7

r 226F 18.52 .21 . 14 1 .18 1.13 47.02 34.66 60.93 2.58 3.95 10D • L226B

T 226C 18.46 .15 . 10 1 .43 1.37 12.47 .10 .18 .62 .95 10D 8 L 2260

1223 17.-3 -.57 -.37 1.28 1.23 12.03 -.34 -.59 .78 1.19 10D 8 L233

T 241 19.27 .96 .63 1.24 1.19 13.45 1 .08 1.90 .81 1.23 10D 8 124 1 L2 48 17.80 -.51 -.33 .95 .91 12.34 -.02 -.03 .46 .71 10G 8 1248

12 55 15.67 -2.64 -1.72 1 .23 1.18 46.33 33.97 59.72 2.66 4 .0 8 10D * 1255

T.2 5TA 1-.20 -1 .1 l -.72 .94 .90 12.60 .24 .42 .5 1 .78 10D 8 L257A

T 25TB 19.40 1.09 .71 1 .35 1.29 12.80 .44 .77 .94 1 .44 10D 8 L2S7B

t 25-r 19.07 .76 .49 1.28 1.22 12.13 -.23 -.40 1.13 1 .72 10D 0 L257C

T 26 2 19.17 . e6 .56 .94 .90 12.71 .35 .62 .37 .57 1*D 0 L262

L2* 5 16. C5 -2.25 -1.47 1 .06 1.02 13.25 .83 1.55 1.13 1.81 10D * 1275

L29' 19.69 1.39 .90 .90 .86 12.73 .37 .65 .70 1 .08 10 D 8 L2SO

128 5 19.33 1.03 .67 .98 .93 12.55 .18 .32 .56 .85 1C D 8 L 235 L301A 19.13 . 83 .54 .72 .69 12.31 -.05 -.09 .29 .45 1CD 8 L301A

13" IB 19.90 1.59 1.04 1.09 1.04 12.90 .54 .94 .66 1 .00 10D 8 L301B

13 0° 17.57 -.74 -.48 1 .00 .96 11.98 -.38 -.67 .74 1.12 1CD 8 L3C9

L31 3 15.93' -2.3e -1.55 1.31 1.25 11 .74 -.62 -1.10 .6 8 1 .04 101 8 131 3

T 341 17.93 -.37 -.24 .46 .44 12.34 -.02 -.04 .45 .69 10D 0 L34 1 L352 16.94 -1.37 -.89 .96 .92 1 1.87 -.49 -.86 .69 1 .05 1 0 D 8 L352

139C 14. 9“ -3.4 1 -2.22 .91 .87 11.57 - .80 -1.40 .73 1.12 10D 8 L390

1563 18.27 -.04 -.02 1.48 1.42 1 1 .97 -,4C -.70 .67 1 .03 10U 8 1563

1567 19.60 1.29 .84 .74 .70 12.80 .44 .77 .65 .99 10D 8 L 567

L5” 5 18.27 -.04 -.03 .80 .76 12.24 -.12 -.22 .64 .99 10J 8 L575

15 91 19.83 1.53 .99 .90 .86 12.41 .05 .09 .35 .53 10D 8 1531

1652 16.40 -1.91 -1.24 1 .68 1.61 46.67 34.30 60.31 3.47 5.31 1 OD * 1652

I68f 16.47 -1.84 -1.20 .92 .88 11.17 -1.20 -2.10 .60 .92 10D 8 L68 0

t 6 98 18.59 .29 .19 1.15 1.10 50.60 38.24 67.23 2.92 4.47 1 OD • L698

L7 34 14.50 -3.81 -2.43 .89 .85 1 1 .30 -1.06 -1.87 .53 .80 1 OD 8 L734

LT 43 19.93 1.62 1 . 06 1.16 1.11 13.33 .96 1.69 1.42 2.13 1 OD 8 L7*3

GR. MEAN * 13.31 PSI GRAND MEAN • 12.36 PSI TEST DETERMINATIONS - 15

e D MEA'JS * 1.53 PSI 3D OP MEANS * .57 PSI 40 LABS IN GRAND MEANS

AVERAGE SDR • 1 .OS PSI AVERAGE SDR • .65 PSI

G°. MEAN 126.23 KILOPASCAL GRAND MEAN - 85.24 KILOPASCAL

Tp TAI NUMBER OF LABORATORIES PET8RTING * 46

Best values: G34 18.5 t 2.6 psi G45 12.4 ± 1.0 psi

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 106C,

194, 226B, 255, 652, 698.

6
pEPOOt MO. 6 S'* TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980

ANALYSIS Tl 0-2 TABLE 2 BURSTING STRENGTH. PSI taFPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T403 OS-76, PBRKINS MODEL C-A OR C WITH AIR OR HYDRAULIC CLAMPS

T AB MEANS COORDINATES

Co DE F G34 G45 MAJOR MINOR

1.~ 34 a 14.50 1 1 .30 -3.95 -.19

r.3 90 a 14.90 11.57 -3.50 -.02

1255 * 15.67 46 .33 4.96 33.71

T.31? a 15.93 11 .74 -2.46 -.08

iso a 16.00 12.02 -2.33 .18

’.Z' 5 * 16.05 13.25 -2.00 1.36

1652 * 16.40 46.67 5.75 33.87

T650 a 16.47 11.17 -2.06 -.76

L 1 25 a 16 .S"' 12.79 -1.60 .81

T. 352 a 16 .<=4 11 .87 -1.44 -.17

<.162 a I

-* .00 11.20 -1.53 -.84

T 25'A a 17.20 12.60 -1.03 .48

LI 63 ft 17.

7 12.47 -.89 .32 L194 a 17.47 46.43 6.73 33.41

T 3 O c a 1" .5T 11.98 -.31 -.21

T 233 fit IT. ’3 12.03 -.63 -.20

'2»fl a IT. 80 12.34 -.50 .09

LI 06C 0 17.93 48.57 7.66 35.39

L341 a 17. S3 12.34 -.37 .06

t 575 a 18.27 12.24 -.07 -.11

L56 3 a 18.27 11.97 -.12 -.38

L 1 76

a 18.33 12.20 -.01 -.17

IZZtT 0 18.46 12.47 .17 .07

L2 26B 0 18 .52 47.02 7.89 33.75

L698 0 18.59 50.60 8.76 37.22

1115 a 18.67 12.51 .38 .07

T 1 05 * 19.72 11.22 .15 -1.21

L2 1 ” m 18.73 12.19 .38 -.27

T 141 0 18.80 12.64 .54 .16

L2 57«- a 19 .07 12.13 .69 -.39

L3 0 1

a 19 . 13 12.31 .79 -.23

T 262 a 19.17 12.71 .92 .15

L24 1 a 19.27 13.45 1.18 .84

L2SS fit 19 .33 12.55 1.04 -.05

T. 2 5~B a 19.40 12.80 1.16 .18

L 1 44 a 19. 4T 13.20 1. 32 .S6

I 1 S'7 fit 19. 47 12. e3 1.23 .20

T 165 fit 19.53 12.39 1.20 -.24

*.5 6^ a 19.60 12.30 1 .36 .14

L230 a 19.69 12.73 1.43 .05

T.5 31 a 19.83 12.4 1 1.5C -.29

L3 013 a 19.90 12.90 1.67 .17

T T43 a 1® .93 13.33 1.79 .58

T 1 1 8 a 19.95 12.43 1.61 -.30

T 1 66 a 19 .97 12.91 1.74 .17 H 55 a 21 .40 12.54 3.05 -.51

GMFAM«5 : ie.3i 12.36

95% ELLIPSE: 4.05 1.19

AVO

R. SDR VAR PROPERT-- -TEST INS^Rl

.83 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 13 TO

.99 10D BURSTING STRBNGTH 10 TO 2.63 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .15 101 BUR9TING STRENGTH 10 TO

1.17 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1.41 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

3.46 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.90 10D BUPSTTNG STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .75 10D BUP9TIMG STRBNGTH 10 TO

.99 10D BUR9TING STRENGTH 10 TO

.91 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.84 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.30 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 T%

2.13 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 -O

1.04 10D BUPSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1.21 10 D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.81 10G BURSTI NG STRENGTH 10 70

2.91 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.56 10D BURSTING STRBNGTH 10 TO

.87 10J BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO 1.22 10U BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.95 10D BURSTING STRBNGTH 10 TO

1 .16 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO 2.54 10D BUPSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

2.78 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.96 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .28 10D BUR9TI NO STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .19 l OF BUP9TINO STRENGTH 10 TO

.99 10D BURSTING STPENGTH 10 TO

1 .47 10D BUR9TING STRENGTH 10 TO

.57 1 OD BURSTING strength 1 0 TO

.73 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .21 10D BUR9TING STRENGTH 10 TO

.89 1 0 D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .37 1 OD BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.92 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.76 1 OD BURSTING STRENGTH 1 0 TO

.93 1 OD BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.85 l OD BURSTING STRBNGTH 10 TO

.97 1 OD BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

• 7C 10D BURSTING STPENGTH 10 TO

1.02 1 OD BUR9TING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .64 1 OD BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.78 10D BURSTING STRENGTH 10 TO

.91 100 BUP9TING STRENGTH 10 TO

.99 10 D BUR9TING STRENGTH 10 TO

1 .00 WITH GAMMA • 12 DEGREES

---CONDITIONS

40 PSI, PBRKIN9 CA OR c. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR c. A T R CLAMP

40 PSI

,

PERKIN9 CA OP e. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PEPKIN9 CA OR c. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C-. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C, AIP CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OP C, AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C, AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C, AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR 0. AIR CLAM®

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR c. AIR CLAM®

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OP C, AIP CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C, AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C:, A. CLAMP, TRANSDUCER

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C, AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS C A. CI AMP, TRANSDUCER

40 PSI, PBRKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKTN9 CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 P9I

,

PBRKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIP CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PBRKINS CA OR AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKIN9 CI, H. CLAMP, TRANSDUCER

40 PSI

,

PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI

,

PERKINS CA OR C. AIP CLAMP

40 PSI, PBRKIN9 CA OR c. AIP CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OP C. AIR CLAM®

40 PSI

,

PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIP CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR r. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C, AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIP CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA *P C, AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C. AIR CLAMP

40 PSI, PERKINS CA OR C, AIR CLAMP

7
KIL0PRSCRL

BURSTING STRENGTH » MODEL C-fl

o

C\J -1

o

o

o -

o

CD

O

CD

O

o

CD

o

LD

SAMPLE G34 = 18-3 PS I SAMPLE G45 = 12.4 PS I SAMPLE G34 = 126 KILOPASCAL SAMPLE G45 = 85 K ILGPASCAL

90 100 1 10 120 130 140 150 160

KIL0PRSCRL
»EP"R* no. oS s TAPPI C8LLABaRATIVB REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 198"

ANALYSIS Til -I TABLE 1 BURSTING 9TRENGTB, PSI - HIGH RANGE

TAPP! OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T403 0S-T6. PERKINS MODEL C OH C-A

SAMPLE INDEX SAMPLE CORRUGATING MEDIUM TEST D. “ 15

’ aB A7T 205 GRAMS PER SQUARE METES B89 127 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

Cf*DE MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DBV SDR R.SDR VAR F 1AB

LI 03 56.* -3.3 -1.14 2.3 . 5C 49.5 -l.l -.45 2.4 • 59 l 1C O L 103

T

1

• - 59.5 -.5 -.16 5.9 1.28 52.1 t.S .59 4.5 1 .09 11C 0 L 107

1 1 1 e 62.1 2. 1 .70 4.4 .96 51.0 .4 .16 3.3 .81 1 ID a LI 1

T 122 60.6 .6 .20 6.3 1.39 52.7 2.1 .86 5.7 1 .37 1 IF a 1122

’ 1 26 58.0 -2.0 -.63 3.8 .83 47.5 -3.1 -1.22 3.8 .93 1 ID a L 1 28

T

. 141 58.5 -l .5 -.52 4.S .98 50.

-.4 -.17 4.4 1 .07 1 ID a L 1 4

1. 1 4 e 61.* 1.7 .57 4.9 1.07 51.2 .6 .24 3.7 .91 1 ID 0 L 1 48

Lift 60.9 .9 .29 3.9 .86 49.2 -1.4 -.55 4.9 t .19 11D a L IS 1

’ 1 59 58.1 -1.9 -.63 4.1 .91 49.4 -1.2 -.46 3.0 .74 1 ID 0 L 1 59

LI "0 59.9 - . 1 — . C5 2.5 .54 49.1 -1.5 -.58 l .8 .44 1 1C a L 17"

: 1 *6 58.3 -1.7 -.57 3.8 .83 49.1 -1.5 -.58 4.5 1 .09 1 ID 0 L 176 ’182 59.0 -1.0 -.34 5.7 1.25 51.2 .6 .24 3.9 .95 1 ID 0 1182

L2 1 8 60.3 .3 . 10 3.1 .69 53.9 3.3 1.31 3.2 .78 1 ID a T 21 e 12 1° 66.5 8.5 2.88 5.8 1.2* 56.1 5.5 2.19 5.5 1 .33 11C • L21 e L232 59.3 -.7 -.25 2.6 .57 52.9 2.3 .94 2.5 .6 1 1 1C a L 232

L2 3*A 64.1 4.1 1.40 2.8 .61 54. S 4.2 1.68 3.6 .88 lie a L237A

T 2 3*5 63.4 3.4 1 . 15 2.9 .63 55.0 4.4 1.76 3.7 .89 1 1C a L237B

L2 3SA 62.2 2.2 .74 4.4 .98 52.1 1.5 .61 6.4 1 .55 1 IT a 1 238A

T 2 48 54.7 -5.3 -1.81 4.1 .90 50.1 -.5 -.19 4.4 1 .06 1 11 0 L 248

L2"8 53.0 -7 .0 -2.39 4.2 .92 46.0 -4.6 -1.83 s.e 1 .22 1 1C 0 1278

L2*9 57.* -2.3 -.77 5.6 1.22 47.6 -3.0 -1.19 5.3 1.28 lie 0 L 279

’280 64.3 4.3 1.46 7.8 1.72 51.9 1.3 .53 4.1 1 .00 1 ID 0 L28C

’294 59.9 -.1 -.02 3.8 .84 46.4 -4.2 -1.67 5.0 1 .22 UC a L 294

L302 58.7 -1 .3 -.44 3.4 .75 48.2 -2.4 -.97 2.8 .68 1 1C a L30 3 L3 1 1 60.3 .3 • C9 3.9 .85 51.3 .7 .27 3.6 .67 1 1C 0 L31

T 330 61 .* 1.7 .59 5.1 1.11 48.4 -2. 1 -.85 4.7 1.13 1 1C 0 L330

! 333 58 .3 -1.7 -.57 5.0 1.09 51.3 .7 .27 5.9 1 .43 1 1C a 1333

L3 34 63 .C 3 . C 1.03 4.7 1.04 53.2 2.6 1.06 3.5 .86 1 1 D 0 1334

L339 58.0 -2.0 -.68 6.6 1.44 44.8 -5.8 -2.31 4.9 1.13 1 1C a L 339

L344 61.0 1 .0 .34 6.0 1.31 52.1 1.5 .60 4.6 1.11 1 1C a L344

L356 59.8 -. 2 -.08 5.4 1.19 49.3 -.3 -.31 4.9 1.19 lie a 1356

L56 3 67.6 7.6 2.57 6.7 1.47 5".

. 1 .03 5.5 1 .35 1 IT • LS63

L565 58.

-2.C -.63 2.9 .64 49.8 -.8 -.33 1.7 .42 1 ID a L565

156* 59. 1 -.9 -.30 4.7 1.03 52.2 1.6 .64 4.3 1 .04 1 ID a L 567

L5”5 6C .6 .6 .21 4.9 I.C7 51.3 . 7 .27 3.7 .91 111 a l 575

15” 6 60.7 .7 .23 4.8 1.05 •

in in 4.8 1.92 2.7 .65 1 IP a 1576

’.5 31 60.8 .e .27 4.9 1.08 51.1 .5 .22 4.

.99 1 ID a 1581

15 9? 60.1 . l .03 5.3 1.15 50.8 .2 .09 4.4 1 .07 1 1C a I 599

’ 604 57.6 -2.4 -.80 5.7 1.26 46.9 -3.7 -1.46 3.6 .87 1 1C a L 604

1622 54.7 -5.3 -1.80 6.4 1.40 47.0 -3.5 -1.41 5.8 1 .40 1 IF • 1622

L650 59.8 -.2 -. 0* 3.2 .70 48. 1 -2.5 -1.01 4.4 1 .03 1 ID a 1650

16 5 1 60 .

• e .27 6.7 1.47 52.4 1.8 .72 4. a 1 .17 1 ID a 1651

L6 8 0 58.0 -2.0 -.68 4.9 1 .08 48.5 -2. 1 -.82 4.5 1.10 1 ID a L680

L? 3 0 60.6 .6 .20 4.3 .94 48.7 -1.9 -.74 4.5 1.10 1 ID a L73C

L*36 53.5 -6.5 -2.22 4.4 . 9* 50.3 -.3 -.12 4.9 1 .19 UC * L736

L* 4 3 61.5 1.5 .52 5.8 1.28 52. 1 1.5 .62 6.1 l .47 1 ID a 1743

GP . ME A” * 60.0 PSI GRAND MEAV • 50.6 PSI TEST DETERMINATIONS * 15 3D MEANS 2.9 “SI SD OF MEANS • 2.5 PSI 45 LABS IN GRAND MEANS

AVEPAGE SDR - 4.6 PSI AVERAGE SDR • 4.1 PSI GP. MEAN 413.7 KIL8PASCAL GRAND MEAN • 348.8 XIIS»ASCAL

1242 61.7 1 .7 .59 5.6 1 .22 51.1 .5 .20 5.3 1 .28 1 IT 1242

+ 2 501 57.6 -2.4 -.81 5.4 1.19 48. 1 -2.4 -.98 2.6 .62 1 IN 12501

12*4 59. 1 -.9 -.32 4.5 .99 50.8 .2 .08 4.0 .98 1 IN L 27 4 L29 0 59.9 -.1 -.05 3.9 .86 53.5 2.9 l .15 3.0 .72 1 1A L290

1393 61.9 l .9 .66 4.4 .97 55.9 5.3 2.11 3.1 .76 1 IB L 393

1394 64.7 4.7 1.61 4.5 .98 55.7 5. 1 2.03 5. 1 1 .23 1 1H 1394

T 5*0 60.2 .2 . 07 3.3 .72 52.8 2.2 .88 4.6 1 .12 1 IH LS7C

15 « 3 70.3 10.3 3.51 7.5 1.64 52.6 2.0 .80 6.4 1 .56 1 1J L 593

T. 59 P 72.9 12.9 4.39 5.3 1.16 56.0 5. 4 2.16 4.5 1 .09 1 IB L59S

1625 55.8 -4.2 -1.44 4.4 .96 53.0 2.4 .98 6.5 1 .58 1 1A 1625

173* 65 .6 5.6 1 .90 6.4 1.41 *4.5 23.9 9.53 4.9 1.19 l 1H L737

’ *16 65.3 5.3 1.81 7.3 1.59 47.1 -3.5 - 1 .38 6.9 1 .68 1 1A 1733

1*54 65.7 5.7 1 .94 4 .

1. 06 55.7 5. 1 2.04 3.5 .36 1 IN L754

"""AT *'I'S1BER "F LABORATORIES REPORTING • 59

3est values: A77 60+5 psi

E89 51 i 4 psi 9
REP^R" M3. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATI VE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL l 98C

ANALYSIS Tll-l ’’"ABLE 2 BURSTING STRENGTB, P3I - H T GH PANGE

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T403 OS-76, PERKINS MODEL C OR C-A

’ AB MEANS COORDINATES AVG

-‘'DE F A7" E89 MAJOR MINOR 8. SDR VAR PROPERTY test INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS

I2~8 * 53.0 46.0 -a .4 .6 1 .07 11C BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 P9I. PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

LT 36 * 53.5 50.3 -5.4 3.7 1 .08 lie BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 8S PSI. PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

’.2 48 54.7 50.1 -4.5 2.8 .98 HI BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C1, A. CLAMP, TRANSDUCER

T 6 22 54.7 47.0 -6 .4 .4 1 .40 HE BURSTING STRENGTH 40 "0 85 PSI. PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

T

fc 25 55.8 53.0 -1.9 4.5 1 .27 11A BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO as PSI. PERKINS A, MANUAL CLAMP

L I 0 3 56 .7 49 .5 -3.3 1.1 .55 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI. PEPKTNS C, MANUAL CLAMP

T 2 SOT 57 .6 48.1 -3.4 -.5 .91 11N BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 psi,;LHOMAPGY, MAN. CLAMP, 20C.65MRH

t 604 * 5".

6

46.9 -4.1 -1.5 1 .07 11C BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI. PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

’ 2’9 ST.

7

47.6 -3.6 -1 .0 1 .25 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

T 5t 5 rt 58.0 49.8 -2.1 .6 .53 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI. PERKINS CA, Al P CLAMP

T.339 ) 58.0 44. a -5.

1

-3.4 1 .31 lie BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

LI 28 a 58.0 47.5 -3.4 -1.2 .88 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI . PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

T 690 58.0 48.5 -2.8 -.4 1 .09 HD BURSTING strength 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKIN3 '"A, AIR CLAMF

LI 59 56.1 49.4 -2.2 .2 .82 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

LI “t se .3 49.1 -2.2 -.2 .96 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L333 5 8.3 51.3 -.9 1.5 1 .26 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

LI 41 58.5 50.2 -1 .5 .6 1 .02 HD BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI. PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L3C3 58.7 43.2 -2.5 -l. 1 .71 lie BUPSTING STRENGTH 40 TO as PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAI CLAMP

LI 82 <4 59.0 51.2 -.4 1.1 1 .10 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L2”4 59.1 50.8 -.6 .7 .98 119 BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS AH, HYDRAULIC CLAMP

t56T 59 .

1

52.2 .3 1.8 1 .04 HD BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI , PERKINS CA. AIR CLAMP

L232 59.3 52.9 .8 2.3 .59 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

LI C 7 H 59.5 52.1 .5 1 .5 1 .19 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PST, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

T 356 fl 59.8 49.8 -.7 -.5 1 .19 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C. MANUAL CLAMP

L650 A 59.8 43.1 -1.7 -1 .9 .89 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO as PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

T 290 59.9 53.5 1.6 2.4 .79 1 1 A BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 35 PSI. PERKINS A, MANUAL CLAMP

iro * 59.9 49.1 -1.0 -1.1 .49 11C BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

L2 9 4 59.9 46.4 -2.6 -3.3 1 .03 lie BURSTING strength 40 TO as PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

15 99 60.1 50.8 .2 .1 1 . 1 1 11C BURSTING S~RENG7H 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C„ MANUAL CLAMP

T 570 60.2 52.8 1 .5 1 .6 .92 11 H BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI . PERKINS AH, HYDRAULIC CLAMP

L 3 l 1 60 .3 51.3 .6 .4 .86 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

1218 60.3 53.9 2.2 2.4 .73 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 P9I , PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L"3 0 * 6C.6 48.7 -.6 -1.8 1 .02 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

1122 * 6 C.6 52.7 1 .8 1.3 1 .33 1 1 F BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C!, H. CLAMP. TRANSDUCER

L5"S a 60.6 51.3 .9 .2 .99 11L BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C!, A. CLAMP, TRANSDUCER

T 5"6 60.7 55.4 3.4 3.4 .85 IIP BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 35 PSI , PERKINS LC, MANUAL CLAMP

’ 651 A 60.8 52.4 1 .7 1.0 1 .32 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 "0 as PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L5 31 * 60.8 51.1 1 .0 -.0 1 .04 HD BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L15 1 A 60.9 49.2 - .2 -1.6 1 .03 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI. PERKINS CA, AIP CLAMP

L34 4 * 6 1 .0 52.1 1.7 .6 1 .21 lie BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

T "43 *4 6 1.5 52. 1 2.2 .3 1 .38 HD BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIP CLAMP

LI 48 6 1 .7 51.2 1.7 -.5 .99 11D BURSTING 9TRENG~H 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS CA. AIP CLAMP

L2 4 2 61 .7 51.1 1.7 -.6 1 .25 11T BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO as PSI , L*W, MANUAL CLAMP

L 3 30 6 1 .7 48.4 . 1 -2.3 1 .12 lie BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI , PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

L393 61.9 55.9 4.7 3.0 .86 11 B BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI , MESSMER. MANUAL CLAMP

Li ie e 62.1 5 1 .5 1.9 -.9 .89 11D BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI . PERKINS CA, AIP CLAMP

T 238A * 62.2 52.1 2.7 -. 1 1 .26 11T BURSTING STRENGTH 40 to 35 P9I, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L334 63.0 53,2 4.0 .3 .95 1 1 D BURSTING 3TRENGTH 40 TO 35 PSI , PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L2 3"B 6 63.4 55.0 5.4 1.5 .76 HC BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

L2 3"A 64.1 54.

a

5.8 .9 .75 HC BURSTING STRBNGTB 40 TO 35 PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

L 2 ° 0 64.3 51.9 4.2 -1.5 1 .36 HD BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 35 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L3 f 4 * 64.7 55.7 6.e 1 .2 1 .10 111 BUR9TING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI. PERKINS AH, HYDRAULIC CLAMP

I "38 65.3 47.1 2.2 -6.0 1 .64 11A BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 85 PSI, PERKINS A, MANUAL CLAMP

L7 3? 65.6 74 .5 18.9 15.6 1 .30 1

1

a BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO as PSI, PERKINS AH, HYDRAULIC CLAMP

L75 4 65.7 55." 7.6 .6 .96 UN BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 35 PSI, LBOMARGY, MAN. CLAMP, 20C.6SMRH

L563 * 67 .6 50.7 6.1 -4.5 1 .41 nr BUR9TING STRENGTH 40 TO 35 PSI, PERKINS CA, AIR CLAMP

L219 * 68.5 56.

1

10.

1

-.3 1 .30 nc BURSTING 3TRENGTH 40 TO as PSI, PERKINS C, MANUAL CLAMP

L 5 9 3 .3 52.6 9.4 -4.6 1 .60 H J BURSTING STRENGTB 40 TO 35 PSI , PERKINS JUMBO, HAND DRIVEN

L5 C 8 72.9 56.9 13.6 -3.5 1 . 12 11B BURSTING STRENGTH 40 TO 35 PSI. MESSMER, MANUAL CLAMP

GMEANS: 6C .C 57.6

95* ELLIPSE:

1 .00

a. 8 4.5 WITH GAMMA • 37 DEGREES

10
KILOPASCAL

280

300

320

340

360

380

400

420

BURSTING STRENGTH, HIGH RANGE

SAMPLE 877 = 60.0 PS I SAMPLE E89 = 50-6 PS I SAMPLE A77 = 414 KILOPASCAL SAMPLE E89 = 349 KILOPASCAL

I 1 T

1

i

1 1 1 340 360 36J 400 420 440 460 480

KILOPASCAL

11
FFP’’7" Nfl. 65S TAPPI CflLLABORATI VE REFEPENCE PROGRAM APRIL I960 ANALYSIS T15-1 TABLE 1 TEARING STRENGTH. GRANS - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

TAPPI TENTATIVE TEST METBflD TO 1 4 TS-65, INTERNAL TEARING RESISTANCE AF PAPER

T AB SAMPLE

G36 74 GRAMS ENVELOPE

PER SQUARE METER

SAMPLE

G47 59 GRAMS WRITINGPER SQUARE METER

TEST D.' IS "3DE MEAN DEV M.DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV M.DEV SDK R .SDR VAR F LAB

lies 60.60 - 1.86 -.60 1.24 .57 38.03 -.37 -.18 1.01 .85 15T fi I 103

I- 1 5 6 1 .’3 -.73 -.23 1.49 .68 37.13 -1.27 -.61 1 .63 1 .42 15T 0 L 105

LI I 59.93 -2. S3 -.81 2.15 .99 39.07 .67 .32 4.71 3.97 1ST a MOT

r i is 5e.20 -4.26 -1.37 2.11 .97 36.10 -2 .30 -1.11 1 .57 1 .32 15C a L 1 1 5 LI 16 59.40 -3.06 -.98 1.59 .73 36.03 -2.37 -1.15 .48 .41 1ST a me

’ 121 63.73 1.27 .41 2.25 1.03 40.00 1 .60 .78 .82 .69 15T a I 121

• 122 63.12 .66 .21 1 .28 .59 38.86 .46 .22 .99 .33 1 SC a I 122

LI 24 61 .07 -1.40 -.45 1 .98 .91 38.73 .33 .16 .80 .67 1ST a L 124

’ 1 26 63.07 .60 . 19 1.58 .72 39.33 .93 .45 .72 .6 1 1ST a L 128

’ 1 31 65.60 3. 1 4 1.01 2.50 1.15 40.20 1 .80 .37 1.21 1.02 15A a I 131

I 1 34 65.07 2.60 .84 .80 .37 39.93 1 .53 .74 .96 .8 1 15C a I 134

T

1 3R 64.20 l. T 4 .56 1 .70 .78 39 .67 1 .27 .61 .72 .6 1 1ST a I 139

’.141 57.93 -4.53 -1.45 2.09 .96 37.47 -.93 -.45 .53 .49 1ST a L 141

’ 1 43 57.87 -4.60 -1.48 2.75 1.26 36.07 -2.33 -1.13 1.10 .93 1ST a I 143

LI 46 62.93 .47 .15 1 .98 .91 39.00 .60 .29 1 .25 1 .06 1 5 T a L 148

t 1 50 59.4" -3.06 -.98 2.75 1.26 36.80 -1 .60 -.77 1.37 1.16 1ST a LI 50

1.153 6v .6" -1.86 -.60 3.42 1.57 37.20 -1 .26 -.58 .86 .73 15C a L 153

LI 55 61 -1.4" -.45 8.71 3. 99 36.7 1 -1 .69 -.82 .87 .73 15T 0 L 1 55

1 IS -* cl .33 -2. 13 -.68 2.47 1.13 36.76 -1.70 -.82 1 .33 1.12 1ST a L IS"

1 1 58 6 1 .’3 -.73 -.23 2.25 1.03 35.80 -2 .60 -1.26 2.27 1.92 15R a L 158

LI 59 63. 2C .74 .24 2.14 .9e 37.27 -1.13 -.55 2.46 2.03 1 SL a L 150

’ 162 57.87 -4.60 -1.48 2.77 1.27 34.33 -4.07 -1.97 2.35 1 .93 1ST a L 162

Llf 3 61 .80 -.66 -.21 2.93 1 .34 38.37 -.03 -.02 .67 .56 1ST a L 163

: i 66 61.60 -.36 -.28 2.41 1.11 37.47 -.93 -.45 .93 .79 1ST L 1 66

1 16’ 64.30 2.34 .75 1 .47 .67 39.73 1 .33 .65 .80 .6’ ISC a L16T

LI" * 6 1.80 -.66 -.21 .86 .39 38 .O’ -.33 -.16 .96 .8 1 15" a I 1 t 0

’ 1 ' 3B 66. 0’ 3.60 1 . 16 2.49 1.14 41 .27 2.97 1.39 1 .67 1 .41 1 5T L1T3B

LI "6 64.93 2.47 .79 l .49 .68 39.67 1 .27 .61 2.02 1 .71 15T I 176 L182A 61.73 - .’3 -.23 3.24 1.48 33 .e7 -4.53 -2.20 2.61 2 .20 1 5A * L132A

’ 1 °2T 61 .60 -.86 -.28 2.69 1.23 38.40 .00 .00 .91 .77 1 5T a L 182"

LI 63 62.33 -.13 -.04 1 .84 .84 38.50 .10 .05 .80 .63 1 5T a L 183

’.165 64.07 1.60 .51 2.71 1.24 39.10 .70 .34 .39 .75 15T a L 185

11 55 63.00 .54 . 17 1 .81 . 83 34.80 -3.60 -1.74 1 .42 1 .20 1 5" * 113?

LI 5 1 65.47 3.00 . 96 1 .92 .ee 39.07 .67 .32 .70 .59 15T a L 191

r l « 4 65.63 3.17 1 .02 1.46 .67 39.80 1 .40 .68 .53 .44 15T * L 194

120 6 64.27 1 . 80 .58 2.12 . 97 39.8 3 1.43 .69 .86 .’2 1ST a 1206

12 OT e5.44 22.58 7.38 2.28 l. 04 57.74 19.34 9.37 1 .62 1 .37 15R * L 207 '211 50.53 -2.93 -.54 1 .46 .67 36.40 -2.00 -.97 .63 .53 15R a L21 1 12 12 61.00 -1.46 -.47 2.39 1.09 37.83 -.57 -.27 1 .14 .96 15T a 1212

1213 63 .93 1.47 .47 1 .94 .39 37.80 -.60 -.29 .68 .57 1ST a L 213

? 2 1" 63.62 1.16 .37 2. 18 1.00 38.17 -.23 -.11 1.42 1 .20 15Q « L 2 1 t

12 1? 63.33 .37 .23 2.09 .96 38.60 .20 .10 .74 .62 15L a L21 = ’223 63 .97 1.51 .48 1 .”3 .32 38.55 .15 .07 1 .08 .9 1 15P a I 223 12268 63.93 1 .47 .47 1 .37 .86 39.33 .93 .45 .82 .69 15T a I 2260

12 2 60 61 .73 -.73 -.23 1.30 .60 38.27 -.13 -.06 .75 .63 1ST a L 2260 L228 6 1 .33 -1.13 -.36 1.40 .64 38.93 .53 .26 .38 .74 15T a 122?

1232 ”1.07 8.60 2.76 1 .33 .84 41 .87 3.47 1.68 1 .30 1 .10 15T • 1232

1233 57.60 -4.86 -1.56 1.59 .73 34.33 -4.07 -1.97 1 .54 1 .30 1ST a L233

L23-A 60 .20 -2.26 -.73 1.86 .85 36.87 -1.53 -.74 .74 .63 1 5T a 1 2 37

A

L2 3T3 62.67 .20 .07 1.50 .68 38.93 .53 .26 .80 .67 15T a L23TB

L238A ’4.47 1 2.00 3.85 14.73 6.74 37.47 -.93 -.45 2.10 1 .77 15T « L238A

124 1 64.87 2.40 .77 .92 .42 40.20 1 .80 .87 .41 .35 1 5T a L 24 1 12 42 64.20 1.73 .56 2.70 1.24 40 .06 1 .66 .80 1 .00 .85 l 5U a L 242

’ 244 64.87 2. 40 .77 1.55 .71 40.00 1 .60 .78 .60 .50 ISC a 1244

1248 65.42 2.95 .95 1.53 .72 39.09 .69 .34 .88 .74 15J a 1248

L249 61 .47 -1.00 -.32 2.20 1.01 37.60 -.80 -.39 .60 .51 15T a L249

1254 61.60 -.86 -.28 2.85 1.30 38.27 -.13 -.06 .38 .74 15T a L 254 1255 6C .00 -2. 46 -.79 2.10 .96 37.20 -1.20 -.58 .86 .73 1ST a 1255

’ 257 A 63.47 1.00 . 32 3.34 1.53 36.00 -2.40 -1.16 3.38 2.85 i 5C a L257A

L257I) 63.57 1.40 . 45 2.56 1. 17 4 1.13 2.73 1 .32 1 .46 1.23 15C a L 25"B

12 570 60.40 -2.06 -.66 3.31 1. 52 37.20 -1.20 -.58 l .01 .85 15C a L25TC

1259 62.33 -.13 -.04 2.50 1 . 14 33.20 -.20 -.10 .94 .79 1 5T a 1.259 126 1 59.37 -3.10 -.99 2.51 1.15 35.90 -2.50 -1.21 .95 .80 1 5T a 1261 L262 60 .6 7 -1.80 -.58 1.18 .54 37.27 -1.13 -.55 .59 .50 15T a L262

126 4 62.93 .47 . 15 l .0 3 .47 4 1 .8" 3.40 1.65 1 . 15 .97 1 5T a 1 264 12
*rPP*9 Nfl, 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFEPENCE PROGRAM APRIL I960 ANAL Yf 1 9 TJ3-I 9ABLB > TEARING STRENGTH, GUAM* - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPBBS

TAPPI TENTATIVE TEST METHOD TAIA TS-6S, INTERNAL TEARING RESISTANCE *P PAPER

’ AB

samp*

C.36 -4 <15048 ENVELOPEPBS square meter

SAMPLE

047 39 GRAMS VRITING

1 PER SQUARE METEP TEST D.« 13

'-DC IRAN DBV v.dev SOR R, SOP MEAN DBV M.DBV SOR P.SDP VAP F LAB

’2* 3 59,73 -2,73 - , 36 2,37 1.09

1.01 38,77 .37 .18 1.22 1.03 1ST a t. 2»3

12* « 63,47 1,90 ,32 2*20 39,73 1.33 .65 2.12 1.79 159 0 L2*4

T8-S 63,13 67 ,21 2.36 1,00 38,97 .37 ,27 .64 .34 139 0 1290

L?-e -1,33 3.37 2,85

-’75

1,80 .02 43.53 3.13 2.49 1.19 1.00 1ST • l 278

60. »V • 2.33 1,41 .64 37,07 • 1 .33 -.65 1.10 .93 13T a L27®

6*,29 -2,24 2.76 1,27 73,73 36.33 17.11 1,16 .90 1SL • L 290

* aej 54,67 •2,(0 -.90 3,81 1.74 30,00 .10 .03 1.22 1 .03 151 a L 28

* *»£ 6 64 ,20 6,74 2,10 3,30 1.60 4,33 5.93 2.07 1 .91 1 .61 1ST • 1285

r 3«? 62,93 .47 .15 2,94 1.30

.88 80,93 42,03 20.60 2.02 1 .90 IS’ • L289

r t.c* 1,47 ?*7 »,79 36,60 •1.00 -.07 1 .84 1.35 1ST a T. 29 0

12® | <1,27 • 1.20 -.38 2,03 .94 38,37 .17 .08 1.13 .90 ISA a L291

’3*^ 59,47 • 3.00 • .90 t.st .69 37,40 • 1 ,00 -.40 1.02 .66 1SQ m L30 1

? 3 C 2 M3 -.’3 • .23 3,17 1,45 37.83 -.57 -.27 .39 .30 1SL m L393

* 3 9' 3 6 4^3 2,67 .66 flu, 1.17 43.07 4,09 2.26 1 .49 1 .23 IS’ • 1305

’ 3 0«- 4, »0 2,34 .75 2.96 1,36 39,93 1.33 .74 .78 .59 1ST a L 309

’.311 (4,43 2,47 .'e 2,34 l .07 30.63 ,23 .11 .07 .36 1ST 0 T.311

•-3»a 66,00 3,84 l.»4 2.« l,u 39,00 1*20 .50 1 .36 1.14 1ST * L 31

’.313 ’1 ,3V 9,00 3,92 2,00 .91 02,20 3.60 1.04 .80 .74 1SL • L313

’.3 t 5 fiior •1,40 -.40 2,30 1,16 38,13 •.27 -.13 .92 .79 1ST 0 L3»5

’ 3£ l *-,33 -1,93 • ,02 3,20 M

49 32,93 •8,4 7 •2.66 1.20 1 .08 1ST • L321

’ 328 63,03 l.<7 .00 ,3« 40,77 2,37 1.15 2.06 1 .73 1ST a I 326

'.333 39,30 • 2,66 .,80 2.70 1.27 30,97 -1,43 -.09 1 .38 1.16 IS’ m T 333

’ 33

60,67 f 1,80 -.00 2,10 .99 30.93 ,53 .26 3.26 2.75 1ST 0 ! 334

’ 336 (0,13 • 2,33 * • 70 2.39 1.09 30.97 •1.43 -.00 ,86 .72 1ST a T 336

’ 344 ti

? r 3,00 1.01 2,33 1.06 2,03 3.63 1.70 1 .34 1.13 1 SC m l 344

’ 348 66, 6V 4,20 1.30 3.02 1,30 39,07 .32 .80 .74 1ST 0 L 346

T 382 13,43 •46.82 • 14,43 .03 ,24 39.01 1.41 .60 .93 .70 ISC • L352

:.3 8 A 34,04 •7,02 *2, A0 1,30 .7) 30.29 • 6,1 1 • 3.93 .90 .83 189 X 1304

’3 60 61,90 *,36 T* 10 ,83 .30 36,47 •2.93 -1.42 .40 .41 187 r I 36*

13“fc 61 ,60 T* 86 • »2S 2.90 1.3« 39;00 •60 .29 1 ,00 .04 1ST 0 L 390

1.3*2 63,2' 2,74 ,00 1.02 .63 30. 73 .33 .16 .96 .81 1 97 0 I 302

13 80 « 1,09 T(60 Tf«« 2,40 1.13 37,13 •1.27 -.01 .63 .70 18T 0 L 386 nee -4,93 ii;4<» 4.00 1,71 .76 34,40 16,00 7.70 .03 .7? 10T § L309

* 3f e 61.32 •1,13 -.30 2,07 1.31 36.93 .03 .26 1.10 .93 IS* 0 L390

’ 3* 6M 82,40 f 4,00 •3.10 6.40 2| 96 33*73 •4,07 • 2.26 l .49 1.20 1ST • J. 390M

1 442 00.0< 3,94 ».26 2,36 1.06

2.01 39,07 1,27 .61 1.03 .06 13S a I 442 14(4 90,67 28,20 6.00 4.38 43,47 0.07 2.46 7.27 6.13 1ST 1 I 464 15ST *2,29 -.20 -,C0 1 .97 .40 39,27 .07 .42 1 .31 1 .27 1ST 0 L 309 1362 62, a- .40 .13 2.03 ,93 30,67 .27 .13 1.23 1.04 1ST m LS62

1366 62,47 .00 .09 1.04 .75 38,07 .27 .13 1 .13 .99 13T a 1566

’ 366 34,83 •8.93 •.46 2.4.7 1.13 30,17 •2.23 • 1.06 .92 .77 1ST a LS66

IS 6 T 63.-3

64,30

>.27 .*> 1.83 .84 40*13 1.73 .84 .64 .54 ISC a L509

T 57 4 2.34 .75 5.00 2.29 39.13 .73 .36 1 .19 t .80 1ST 0 L094

15-3 62,31 f.l* Y , 05 t .33 .61 38,16 • ,24 -.12 1.41 1.19 13L 0 L 875 13-6 68,0 64 00 1.25 .57 1 ,07 3. 27 1.36 4.03 3.41 tOT m L070

13*0 63.40 .94 .30 1,30 ,69 40. « 2 ,00 .97 .74 .62 1ST e L308

13 41 63,20 .7# .2* 3.13 1,44 39,22 .02 .40 .98 .02 13Q a L38

’344 61,67 -.80 -.20 2,13 .9- 38.57 .17 .08 .80 .67 139 a I 399

16 0 4 60,93 •1.33 * .49 2.37 1.09 30,73 ,1.67 -.81 1 .22 1 .03 1ST a L634

16 06 ’2,40 9,94 3,19 2.50 > . 1 7 1,93 3.33 1.71 1 .23 1 .08 139 4 L0<*6

’6 1* 65,27 2,80 ,90 3.17 1.45 30,87 •1,53 -.74 1.41 1.19 1ST a L 6 1

16 22 39,53 -22,93 -7.36 1.46 ,67 20.70 -11.70 -3.07 1 .07 .90 1SL « L022

’623 68, 90 5.34 1.70 3,90 2,78 46,80 8.44 4.07 2.31 2.37 1ST X 1623

1626 62,33 ,07 ,02 1.64 .75 39.22 .82 .40 .61 .3 1 13L a I 626

166 1 36,80 •3,60 -1.02 1.66 .70 38.13 -.27 -.13 1 .60 1 ,33 1ST » L 63

16 54 36.93 .3.33 ii.va 1,16 .53 36,7 3 -1 ,67 -.81 .70 .59 1ST a I 634

I6-C 6", 47 •2.00 -.64 2.39 1.04 34.33 *3,37 • 1.07 1.73 1 .46 1ST a L670

16 Tt i»,-3 -.73 -,23 2,12 .97 30.13 -.27 -.13 1.13 .95 1ST a L676

16 8? 32,33 •39,13 •9,07 .62 .28 40,40

41.13

2.00 .97 1.18 l .00 15T # L680

16 04 6 3,26 .7* ,26 1 ,66 .76 2,73 1.32 1 .36 1.14 13L a L 684

L6 0 5 64,27 ?.ao ,58 2,49

2,20

1,14 76,93 38,33 18.66 1.49 1 . 25 1 ST • L68S

1.642 62,00 7*46 .,13 1.08 37,10 -1.30 -.63 .89 .73 1ST a I 692

1696 63.73 1.27 2.99

1 .52 1.37 39 .87 l .47 .71 1 .06 .89 139 a L696

169- £3,00 1.34 .43 ,70 33.43 -2.97 - 1.44 1.08 .9 1 15T • L699

169 0 64433 1.37 .60 1.54 .71 41.13

X3

2.73 1.32 3.14 2 .64 15L a L6«»
v*. 653 TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS 115-1 TABLE 1 TEARING STRENGTH. G PAMS - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

"APPI TENTATIVE TEST NETHOD T4 1 4 T3-65, INTERNAL TEARING RESISTANCE <"F PAPER SAMPLE ENVELOPE SAMPLE WRITING TEST D.- 15

T AB G36 74 GRANSi PER 300 ARE METER G47 59 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

MEAN DEV N.DEV 9DR R. SDR MEAN DBV N .DEV SDR R.SDR . VAR F LAB

T * 04 50.27 -6.20 -1.99 2.25 1.03 36.13 -2.27 -1.10 1 .47 1.24 1ST 0 L794

1' ' 5 52.20 -10.26 -3.30 12.52 5.73 54.47 16.07 7.78 13.79 1 1 .63 1ST * L?"5

L*>3« 5° .13 -3.33 -1.07 3.25 1.4« 37.47 -.93 -.45 3.04 2.57 . 15T 0 L738

T ’ 43 6 1 .=>3 -.53 -.17 1.87 .86 39.40 1 .00 .48 1 .39 1.17 15L 0 L743

'-'46? 6<* .67 -1. 90 -.58 2.47 1.13 38.07 -.33 -.16 .70 .59 15T O L746S

'~Z8 69.49 6. 32 1 .93 4.46 2. 04 44.18 5,78 2.80 1.53 1 .29 1ST * L758

i'59 71.33 8.87 2 .es 11.18 5.12 38.13 -.27 -.13 1.13 ,9S 1ST X L7SC

r " tOK 5~ .53 -4.93 -1.58 2.03 .93 36.07 -2.33 -1.13 .75 .63 15P 0 I TfeOA L“ 6 OB 59.73 -3.73 -1.20 1.87 .86 37.53 -.87 -.42 .92 .77 15L 0 I760B

‘ *6 0C 58.37 -3.60 -1.16 2.03 .93 36.53 -1 .87 -.90 .79 .67 15fi o L76 r ''

T.'6Cn 59.27 -3.20 -1.03 1.79 .82 37.03 -1.37 -.66 .74 .63 15T o L760i>

«*•. mean • 62.40 GRAMS GRAND MEAN » 38.40 GPAMS TEST DETERM I NATIONS - 15

“

D

* 3.11 GRAMS SD OF MEANS • 2.06 GRAMS 127 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDR * 2.18 GRAMS AVERAGE SDR * 1.19 GRAMS

MF,Axt • 612.6 MILLINERTON GRANS MEAN • 376.6 MILLTNEWTGN

’ 2 5P* 69 .5" 7. 10 2. 28 2.55 1.17 41.98 3.58 1.73 l .00 .85 1SH I 25 rL

T 3’fe C2.07 -.40 -.13 2.19 1.00 39.60 1 .20 .58 1 .33 1.12 15N L 326

T 33C 61 .60 -.96 - .29 2.29 1.05 38.40 .00 .00 ;.24 1 .05 15N L339

f_3 4 l 60.13 -2.33 -.-’5 1.55 .71 36.73 -1.67 -.81 .30 .67 15N I 341

f 3 56 60.13 -2.33 -.’5 2.85 1.30 37.37 -i .03 -.50 1 .42 1.20 15N L 356

T 5f 5 79.60 17.14 5. SO 1.35 .62 52.80 14.40 6.97 .94 .~9 15E L585

’-'06 16.93 -45.53 - 14.62 .80 .37 41.53 3.13 1.52 2.67 2.25 15T L 706

t *34 ’2.11 9.64 3.10 1 1 .27 5.16 34.99 -3.41 -1.65 1 .02 .86 15N L734

’.'46° 62.27 -.20 -.06 2.79 1.28 39.97 1 .57 .76 ' .97 .82 15N L”46P

l” £4 67.73 5.27 1 .69 1 .05 .48 42.11 3.71 1.80 1.18 1 .00 ' 15H I 754

’-O-A’ v- 7mBER «F LABORATORIES REPORTING • 151

Best values: G36 62.3 ± 5.2 grama

G47 38.4 ± 3.4 grams

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 238A,

280, 288, 352, 388, 484, 680, 685, 705.

Data from Che following laboratories were not understood: 207, 622.

14
REPOPT NO. 65S TAPPI COIXABORATI VB REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 19*0

ANALYSIS T15-1 TABLE 2 TEARING STRENGTH, GRAMS - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

TAPPI TENTATIVE JB8T METHOD T414 TS-6S, INTERNAL TEARING RESISTANCE OF PAPBR

*-AB f*1DE F MEANS «36 G47

C90RP1 NATES

SAJfl * M INOR AVG

R. SDR VAR PROPERT TEST INSTRUMENT-—CONDITIONS

1352 # 15.95 39. St -39.4* 24.65 .51 15C TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWI NG-ELMENDORF (7. AIR CLAMP)

T" 6 16.93 4} ,53 *37,7* 25.84 1.31 1SX TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G: GIVE INSTRUMENT MAZE, MODEL

T t>8* • 32.33

39.53

40.40 -25.02 16,94

lUt

.64 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 16* ) 16 22 • 26,70 -25.7* .78 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, LORENTZ-HETTRES

L"'5 f 52,2* 54.47 -,’6 19,05 8.68 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ir*

)

:3?ew * 52, as 33.73 -I0.7C .83 2.10 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100 ) 13 53 X 5*. af 30,29 •10.67 *3.17 .77 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG, THWING- ELMENDORF( SCALE TO 100 )

r “04 4 56,27 36,13 -6.50 1,16 1.13 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG. THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 106 ) T 61 1 » 56.30 38,13 •5.03 2.62 1 .05 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 11 OG, THWING- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ICO ) T 654 56,93 36,73 • 5.62 1.35 .56 1ST TEASING STRENGTH 35 TO 11 OG , THWING- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10* ) L"6 0A fl 57,53 36. CT •3.44 .47 .73 15R TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWI NG- ELMBNDORF , DIGITAL READOtT

1233 fl 57.68 34,35 •6.25 -

1 ,06 1 .02 1ST TEA3ING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100 ) ' 162 fl 57,87 34,33 *6.02 • 1.29 1.63 X5T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO tec

)

1143 fl 36,07 •8,15 .30 1 .09 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF< SCALE TO 106 ) T 1-*} fl 57,93 37,4? •4,30 1. 48 .72 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1100, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 1C« ) *115 fl se,2f 36.}«

37 i53

74 . e4 .16 1.15 15Q TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWI NG-ELMENDORF (W.AIW CLAMP)

T”6CB fl 56.73 •3.66 1.13 .81 1SL TEARING STRENGTH 35 T9 HOG, LOHENTZ-WB^THES

T “bCT fl 58.87

59,13

36,53 • 4,05 .20 .80 15R TEARING STRENGTH 35 T* 11 00 , •HWING- El MBNDO RP , DI G ITAL REA Dotf- IT’S fl 37.47 -3.36 ,87 2.03 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 11 OG , THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO IOC ) IT 6 OP • 59,27 37,03 •3.45 ,43 .72 1ST “EARING strength 35 TO 11 OG, THWING- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 106 )

* 2c l fl 59,37 35,95 •3.94 •.60 .97 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1160, THWING- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ICO ) 11 IS fl 59,40 36,03 -3.54 *.50 .57 1ST TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10* ) 115' fl 59,40 36.80 •3.45 .18 1.21 15T TEAR INO STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWI NG-ELMENDflRF( SCALE TO 16* )

1 3' 1 A fl 59,47 37,40 •3,09 .65 .77 150 TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING-ELMENDORF , AIP CLAMP, DIGIT

7 566 r 59 .53 36. I’ -3.66 -,45 .95 15T TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110O , THWING-HT MEND6RF! SCALE TO IOC )

*.211 fl 59.53 36,48 *3.54 • « 25 .60 1 SR TEARING STPENGTH 35 TO 11 00, THWI NG-ELMENDORF, DIGITAL READOUT

’ 231 fl 59.67 33.60 •2,37 1,50 1.39 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWINO-BLMENDORF< SCALE TO IOC ) 12* 3 fl 59,73 38.77 -2,17 1.69 1 .06 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10* ) T 333 a 59.89 36.97 •3.62 .19 1.22 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORP( SCALE TO 16* ) LI ' a 59,93 39,0 7 •1.85 1.85 2.48 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWI NG-ELWENDORF( SCALE TO ICC- )

7 255 fl 6«.<56 37.20 -2.7? .20 .84 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO nOG.THWING-ELNEHDORF< SCAT E TO 1 00 ) 1356 • 60,13 37,37 • 2.53 .28 1 .25 15M TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

1341 60,13 36.73 • 2,65 •.27 ,69 ISN TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO COT OUT

1336 a 60.13 36,97 -2.74 -.06 .91 1 5 T TEARING strength 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10O ) 7.2* ? fl 60,13 37,07 •2.69 .02 .79 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO IOC )

L2 3*A r. 6 C, 20 36.0" *2.73 -.18 .74 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWI NG-ELMBNDORF( SCALE TO 10* > 12 S' 4 6? ,27 73,73 » 5. 89 3*. 63 1.12 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, LORENTZ-WETTRES

1157 a .33 ?6.7J -2.76 *.40 1.13 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG. THWING-ELMENDORF( SCALE TO 10* » L2S”C fl 60 ,40 37,25 -2.39 ,c» 1.19 15C TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF (W.AIR CLAMP)

16”' 6' ,47 34.53 -3.67 •2.33 1.27 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG. THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100 )

* 321 « 66.53 32,93 •4.42 -3.75 1 .28 1ST TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 1 00 )

1 1 53 a 60.60 37.2 0 -2.21 -.10 1.15 15C TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF (W.AIP CLAMP

)

*.l 03 <t 60,60 38.0 3 •1 .80 .62 .71 1ST •EARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 16* ) 7.’46« a 60.67 38.07 -1.72 .62 .86 1ST •EARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10* ) t 334 fl 60.67 38,93 • 1 .28 1.37 1 .87 15T TEARING STRENO’H 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100 1

126 2 A 60.67 37 ,27 • 2.12 -.07 ,52 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 106 ) 16' 4 fl 6C.93 36.73 • 2. 16 *»67 1 .06 15T TEAR INO STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 160 > 7 212 fl 61.00 37. P 3 -1.55 .23 l .03 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ICO ) 1155 fl 61.-57 36,71 -2.0b -.75 2.36 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10* ) 1124 a 61. 38.73 •l ,C 4 .99 .79 1ST TEARING STPENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 16* )

13 15 fl 6 1/’ 35,13 -1.34 ,*r ,98 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG. THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100 ) r 2«1 a 61.37 38.57 •.95 .75 ,95 15A TEASING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, APPITA

1.3S0 a 61.33 38,93 -.71 1 .03 1.12 1ST TEARINO STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWINO-ELMENDOPF! SCALE TO ICO ) 1228 a 6 1,33 38.93 -.71 1,03 .69 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ICO ) 12 4? a 61.47 37,60 -1,26 -.19 .76 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG , THWING-EI MENDORF! SCALE TO 1C* ) 133? 6 1 .60 38.40 -.76 .44 1.05 15N TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G. THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

1 1 82TM a 6 l ,60 38,40 *.”5 .44 1 .00 15T TEASING STRENGTH 36 TO 1 10G, THWI NG-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10* ) 1254 a 6 1.60 38.2* -.81 .32 1 .02 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 16* ) 13* 6 a 61.60 39.00 -.84 .95 1 .10 1ST TEARINO STRENGTH 35 TO 110G. THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 1C* ) 1166 a 61.60 37.47 • 1.22 *,37 .95 15T TEARINO STRENGTH 35 TO 11 00, THWI NG-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO IOC ) 1595 a 6 1.67 38.57 -.61 ,55 .82 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1100, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ICO ) 11'

a 61 ,73 37.13 • 1.27 -.73 1 .05 15T TEARING STPENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ICO ) 1158 a 6 1.73 35.80 -1.94 •1.68 1.47 15R TEARINO STPENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG , THWI NG- ELMENDOSF .DIGITAL READOUT

7.676 M <M«"3 38.13 -.77 .14 .96 15T TEARING STPENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ie*

)

L226C f 61,73 38.27 -,76 .25 .61 15T TEARING STPENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100 )

15
REPORT NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE PEFERENCB PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSTS T15-1 TABLE 2 TEARING STRENGTH. GRANS - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

TAPPI TENTATIVE TEST METHOD T4 1 4 TS- 6S. INTERNAL TEARING RESISTANCE OF PAPER

•AB MEANS COORDINATES AVG C«DE F G36 G47 MAJOR MINOR P. SDR VAR PROPERTY TEST INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS

T. 1 8 2 A o 6 1.33 33.87 ”2.91 -3.55 1 .84 15 A TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, APPITA

T 303 a 6 1.73 37.83 -.92 -.12 .97 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, LORENTZ-WETTRES M?P a 61.80 38.07 -.74 .05 .60 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDOEFt SCALE TO. ICC )

' 1 £3 a 6 1 .80 38.37 -.59 .31 .95 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TX 11 OG.THWING- ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICC ) t 3 PC a 61.87 37.13 -1.15 -.79 .91 1 ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG. THWING- ELMENDORFt SCALE TO. 1C" )

r

. 36C 6 1 .90 35.47 -1.96 -2.25 .39 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 1C" )

T "43 61.93 39.40 .04 1.13 1 .0 1 151 TEAR ING STRENGTH 35 TO hog, lorentz-wettpes

L692 a 62.30 37.10 -1.06 -.89 .88 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICO )

I 326 « 62.C7 39.60 .26 1.24 1 .06 15N TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 leO.THWING-ELMENDORF. NO CUT OUT LS57 a 62.20 39.27 .21 .88 1 .09 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G. THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE T0 ICC )

L"4 6P 62.27 39.97 .62 1.45 1 .05 15N TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

LE"5 62.31 38.16 -.26 -.13 .90 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G, LORENTZ-WETTRES

I 25 = a 62.33 38. 2C -.21 -. 1 1 .97 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 1C" ) L 1 « 3 a 6 2.33 38.50 -.06 .15 .76 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G,THWING-ELMENDORF( SCALE TO 1C- ) L 565 a 62.43 38.67 . 1 * .23 .87 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING-EI MENDORFt SCALE TO IOC J

T.626 a 62.53 39.22 .47 .67 .63 1SL TEARING STRENGTH 35 T0 110G, LORENTZ-WETTRES

L23"3 a 62.67 38.9 3 .44 .36 .68 15T TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G , THWING-EL MENDORFt SCALE TO ICO ) LS62 a 62.87 38.67 .48 .03 .99 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 10 c

)

T 268 0 62. °3 80.93 21.82 36.51 1 .52 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG , THWI NG- ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICO ) L 1 46 a 62.93 39. CC .71 .28 .98 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING- ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICO )

1 264 a 62.93 41 . 8C 2.12 2.70 .72 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 100 ) 1139 « 63.00 34.80 -1.35 -3.38 1 .02 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG , THWI NG“ELUENDORF( SCALE TO ICC ) 1128 a 63. "7 39.33 .99 .50 .67 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICC ) T 122 5 63. 12 38.86 .80 .07 .71 15C TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF (W.jME CLAMP

)

f 2 " 5 a 63.13 38.97 . 36 . 15 .81 1ST TEAR ING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCAIE TO . ICO )

T 531 a 63. 20 39.22 1.C5 .34 1.13 150 TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF. AIR CLAMP, DIGIT

I 1 53 a 63.20 37.27 .06 -1.35 1 .53 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, LORENTZ-WETTRES

1664 a 63. 20 41.13 2.01 1.99 .95 1 SL TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G, LORENTZ-WETTRES

32 1 ? a 63 .33 38.60 .85 -.26 .79 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, LORENTZ-WETTRES

LS 8 - a 63.40 40.40 1.82 1 . 26 .65 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G , THWING-ELMEN DO RF( SCALE T 0 ICC )

T 2' 4 a 63 .47 39.73 1.54 .65 1.40 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCAIE Tfl 100 ) T 25T A H 63.47 36. CO -.34 -2.58 2.19 1 SC TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF (W.AIR CLAMP

)

T 32 P a 63.53 40.77 2.12 1.51 1 .06 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICO ) T 2 1 " a 63.62 38.17 . 38 -.78 1 .10 150 TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G. THWI NG-ELNENDO RF, AIR CLAMP, DIGIT

T 696 a 63.73 39.87 1.84 .63 1.13 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 1 "" ) M2 1 a 63.73 40 .00 1 .30 .74 .86 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE Tfl 100 ) 3567 a 63. "3 40.13 1.97 .86 .69 1 5C TEARING STPENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF *t W .AIR CLAMP

)

L69’ * 63. ao 35.4 3 -.34 -3.24 .80 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1OG.THWING-ELMEND0R.FI SCALE TO ICC ) f 2 5*3 a 63.87 41.13 2. 59 1.66 1 .20 1 50 TEAR ING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF (W.jMR CLAMP

)

t 22 60 a 63.93 39.33 1.74 .07 .77 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALB TO ICC )

I 29C a 63.93 36.60 .36 -2.29 1.19 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G , THWI NG- ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 100 ) 1213 a 6 3.93 37.80 .97 -1.26 .73 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICC ) 3 22 3 a 63.97 38.55 1.38 -.63 .87 1 5 R TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING-ELMENDORF, DIGITAL READOUT

31 85 a 64.07 39.10 1.74 -.20 1 .00 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G.THWI NG-EL MEN DO RFt SCALE TO 1 C? ) L242 a 64.20 40 .C 6 2.33 .56 1 .04 150 TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G, AUSTRALIAN OPT. CO.

3 1 3? a 64 .20 39 .67 2.14 .22 .69 1ST TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO IOC ) 32 C 6 a 64 .27 39.83 2 . 28 .33 .85 1 ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG , THWI NO- ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICC ) 3685 • 64.27 76.9 3 20.96 32.38 1.20 1ST TEAR ING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 10 " ) 36 8 8 a 64.33 41.13 2.99 1.42 1 .67 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, LORENTZ-WETTRES

T 3' 5 # 64.53 43. C7 4. 14 2.99 1.21 1ST TEA? ING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICC ) 35" 4 a 64 .80 39.13 2.39 -.54 1 .65 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO H OG, T3WING- ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 100 ) 33 08 a 64.80 39.93 2.79 .15 .97 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO 1 00 ) 3167 a 64.80 39.73 2.69 -.02 .67 1 SC TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF (W.AIR CLAMP

)

324 1 a 64.87 40.20 2.38 .35 .33 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICC ) 3 244 a 64.37 40.00 2.38 . 17 .61 1 SC TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF (W.AIR CLAMP

)

3311 a 64.93 38 .63 2.25 -1.04 .82 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG, THWI NG-ELMENDOPFt SCALE TO IOC ) U’6 a 64.93 39.67 2.77 -.15 1.19 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO ICC ) 3134 a 65.07 39 .03 3.02 .01 .59 15C TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1100, THWING-ELMENDORF tW.AIR CLAMP

)

I 382 a 65. 20 38.73 2.53 - 1 .09 .82 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE T 0 ICC ) 361* a 65. 27 36.87 1.65 -2.74 1 .32 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE TO IOC ) 3248 a 65.42 39.09 2.9C -.89 .73 15 J TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G. LORENTZ-WETTRES

3191 a 65.47 39.07 2.93 -.94 .74 15T TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt SCALE 100 ) 3131 a 65.60 40 .20 3.62 -.02 l .08 15A TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G, APPITA

3 1 = 4 65.63 39 .80 3.44 -.39 .56 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-ELMENDORFt «CALE TO 10 c ) 3312 - 66.00 39.60 3.66 -.74 1.12 15T TEARING STRENGTH 3S TO 1 1 OG , T SWING- ET- MENDORFt SCALE T0 1C" )

16
PCPOP- NO. 65S TAPP! COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM appil tsec ANALYSI 9 TJS-1 ‘‘ABIE 2 TEARING STRENGTH, GRANS - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

•APPI TENTATIVE TEST METHOD T414 TS-65, INTERNAL TEARING RESISTANCE OF PAPER

T AB

<'-DE F NEAK« C36 G^T

COORDINATES

4AJOS MINOR

AVG

R, SDR VAR PROPBHTY TEST INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS

M“3B 0 66 . 0’ 41,27 4.56 ,66 1,27

,98

1ST TEAR ING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG. THWINO-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100)

T-44 2

m 6* ,4<* 39. $7 4.** *, 89 1SR TEARING STRENGTB 35 TO 1 1 OG . TBWI NO- ELMENDORF , DIGITAL READOUT

T. 34 5 <9 M> .67

61 .4*

39 ,f 7 3.97 •».64 1.06 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 38 TO 1 10G.THWI NO- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO ICO)

L344 * 42,0 3 6.16 ,62 ». >0 JSC TEARING STRENGTB 38 TO 110O, THWING-BLMENDOWF (W.AIR CLAMP)

t"54 67,73 42,11 6.42 .53 15R TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 ICG. LBOMARGT. 20 C. 63* RH

>6 25 X 6 *,?C 46,80

4li67

9."1 4,^7 2.83 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO llOG.THWING-BLMBNDORF! SCALE TO ICO)

». 5’6 * 6,83 -.20 1,99 15T TEARING STRENGTH 33 TO 11 OO, TBWI NG- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10*

)

f»56 * 68,49 44 . *8 9.11 1,96 1 .67 » 8 T TBARING STRENGTH 38 TO 1 10O, THWINO-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10*

)

T 2F5 • 69 ,26 44,33 9.81 »,73 1,58 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 100, THWINO-ELMENDORF! 3CALB TO 100)

t 2 5' ’ 69,5- 41,98 »,94 *,48 i.9» 15H TEARING STRENGTH 3? TO 1 10G, LBOMARGT, 20 C, 65* PP

* 232 * T!/» 41.87 9,18 *1,34 .97 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 11 OG, THWINO-ELMENDORF! SCALE T0 100)

T

. 2’8 # ’1.33 43,53 10.25 ->03 ,91 1ST 7BA.RING STRENGTH 35 TO HOG, THWINO-ELMENDORF! SCALE Te 100)

X ’1.33 38.13 7.83 •4,70 3.03 15T TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110G.THWING- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100)

T 3 l 3 * 7ji97 42,20

34,90

*0.04 rU*» .83 15L TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1100, L0RENT7- WBTTRES

!”34 • 72.11 8.61 • 7,80 3.01 1 SN TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 1 OG .THWING- ELMENDORF , NO CUT OPT 604 * ’2.40 41,93 \ a. 36 7 1 . 98 ».»2 15T TEARING STRENGTH 35 •0 1 1 OG, TBWING- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100)

T238A f 74,4’

74,93

3T,4T 9.90 • 6.68 4.26 i8T •EARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 IOO, TEWING- ELMBNDORP! SCALE TO 160)

*.3f 9 • S4.40 (8,63 7.84 4*t 1ST TEARING strength 35 TO HOG, THWING-ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 100)

» 565 ’9.60 52.60 22,06 3.61 *» ISB TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 110O, THWINO-ELMENDORF, AMBIENT C-VD.

L2C- t 96,44 51.74 29.59 8,14 1 . 2 * »5* TBARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1

OG , THW I NO- ELMENDORF .DIGITAL PEA DOPL4f 4 • 90,67 43,47 26,92 49,82 4.07 1ST TEARING STRENGTH 35 TO 1 10G, THWING- ELMENDORF! SCALE TO 10*) GMFANN ! 62,46

954 1 38,40BLLIPSEj 9.79 3,01 1.60 WITH GAMMA • 30 DEGREES

17
MILLINEHT0N

260

280

300

320

340

360

380

400

420

440

460

480

TEARING STRENGTH, PRINTING PAPERS

SAMPLE G36 = 62. 5 GRAMS SAMPLE G47 = 38.4 GR8MS

SAMPLE G36 = 613 M I LL I NEWTON SAMPLE G47 = 377 M I LL I NEWT0N

i

1 1 1 1 1 i

1 1 1

1 i 500 520 540 560 580 600 620 640 660 680 700 720

MILLINEWTGN

18
7RF"** M«, 6#4 nm C0LLAB0RATX VI IimiNCI PN0QNAM

ANALYSIS X16-I *ABLS 1 “SA SI MO STYBNOTS, 0NAM9 - PNJVANXLY PACEAOXNO SAFINS

TAPPI TSNTATXVI IIST METHOD 7414 TS-68, INTBNNAL TBANINQ 1SSXITANCI OF SAFIN

Aim i*so

SAMPLE EL SAC BED SAMPLE INAPT COATING EASE TEST • IB AH *80 EDI

ITBN 949 96 ONANN FEN SQUARE MB^BN

CODE MEAN DEV N.DIT 8. SDN KEAN DET M.DBT IDE a, SDR VAN F LAB

1.1 22<* IIP.* 0.2 I.1T 6,1 1.27 93,4 2,9 .72 2.3 .86 16C 6 L122C

: tti 102,5 Tw .» • 1,33 6,7 .96 78.7 »4,e • 1.20 4.1 1.58 16C 6 L 181

T 230 li*.i S.4 1,01 S.3 1,09 98,3 ' •2,6 V 1.21 2.7 1 .08 16N <4 L23«

’-231 108.6 74.

.,74 2.9 .61 77.9 • •AS 2.4 .91 16T 0 L231

1,244 H6t 3 6.4 1,23 4*3 .89 86.6 6,1 1 .56 2.1 .79 16J 0 L248

L265 lit.

1.** ,3» 6*1 1.26 79.

•1,1 • .26 3.2 1.21 167 s I 268

13 IP 1*4,1 •8.6 • 1.94 4.4 .91 75,9 -4.7 41.17 2.2 .88 160 6 L301B

’ 324 1*6,2 1*3,3 • «65 3,9 .73 8*f 1 fs* •.10 1.2 .49 16T 0 1324

l 366 N0 DATA REfflBTBO FOB SAMPLE *50 38^1 •48,4 - 11.49 1.0 .36 16T M L366

'3 = 3 10T.S • 2 r 2 -.41 4.2 ,88 76.9 • 1,6 -.4® 1.8 .57 16T 0 L353

VT 3“ 160.2 50,5 9.43 3,6

5*1 .74 l 29.3 46.9 11,76 2.2 .66 16R • L730

T"35 116.4 4.7 1.24 1.D5 #4,4 3,9 .98 3.4 1 .30 167 0 L73S

V*37 103,6 •6,1 71.13 4.7 ,9’ 75.2

9342

• S. 3 -1.34 2.6 .99 16C 0 1737

l 736 Ml.1.9 ,36 6,6 1.36 2.7 .67 3.7 1 .42 16T PI L738

G-> t MEAN f 109,7 a NAM* GRAND MEAN • 60,8 07019 TEST DETERMINATIONS • 15

• 5,4 «»A*W SO «T MEANS • 4.0 GRAMS 12 LABS !M GRAND MBA*3

AVBNACB SOB » «,0 CRASS ATENAGE TOR • 2.6 GRAMM

no, WE AM •1075.6 MTLI7MBMT0N GRAND MEAN 7 789,6 MHLTNEWT4N

’ 166 1 *7,6 Nf* 1.48 8.4 1.12 84.0 67’s

3,5 .87 2.8 .96 16N Ll<*6 L ! 22V 120.1 19,8 1.93 6,0

i2

1,24 ? T® 1,76 2.4 .91 16N L122N

LI 44 105.4 7*1 7,01 .87 79,1 • .36 1.7 .64 16N L 1 48

' 228 119,2 9.5 1,78 3*» .64 86.5 6,0 1.81 2.4 .93 16N L 225

’.2 34 117,4 7.9 »,4« 6,6 1 .36 99,7 8.1 2.08 3.6 1 .39 I6N * L 234

t-26 -* 122,4 }2.T

a*« 2,38 6,9 1.44 94,5 13.9 3.90 3.9 1 .32 16N L 267

’..264 112,5 ,93 6.5 1,34 96,9 8,3 1,33 2.4 .92 16* L 269

1.7 0 2 103.2 •6,9 71.21 6,3 1.30 2.5 • 6,0 • 2.01 5.C 1 .90 16* • L702

TOTAL VTNBSS OF LABORATORIES REPORTING

Beat values; K50 110 t 10 grams

G49 30 t 7 gram

22

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results t 730.
REPORT NO. 65S TAFPI COLLABORATI VE REFERENCE PROGRAM | APRIL 1 9e0 ANALYSIS 116-1 "ABLE 2 I TEARING STRENGTH. GRAMS - PRIMARILY PACKAGING PAPERS ' TAPPI TENTATIVE TEST METHOD T414 TS-65, INTERNAL "EARING RESISTANCE OF PAPEP

LAB MEANS COORDINATES AVG C*DE F K50 G49 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PRCPEPTY TEST INSTROMENT- --CONDITIONS

t 366 M 35.1 .36 16T TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G , THWI NQ-ELMENDORF( SCALE TO 100 ) MSI • 162.5 75.7 -3.6 .4 1.28 16C TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G, . TEWING- ELMENDORF (W.AIR CLAMP

)

L* ‘ 2 1C3.2 72.5 -9.9 -2.6. 1 .60 16X TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G : GIVE INSTRUMENT MAIE, MODEL

I "3" If 3.6 75.2 -3.C -.7 .98 160 TEAR ING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G.. THWING-ELMENDORF (W.AIR CLAMP

)

T 3MB 1C 4 .

1

75.9 -7.2 -.5 .88 160 TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G, THWING-ELMENDORF, AIR CLAMP. DIGIT

1231 1C5.6 77.9 -4.8 .3 .76 16T TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 1 50G , THWING- ET.MENDORF( SCALE TO 100 ) L324 106.2 80.1 -3.0 1.7 .60 16T TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 1 50G, THWING— ELM£NDORF( SCALE 10 100 ) L393 * 10". 5 78. 9 -2.7 .0 .72 16T "EARING STRENGTH 60 TO 1 50G.THWING-ELMEN DO RF( SCALE TO ice )

T 146 109.6 79. 1 -.9 -1.1 .76 16N TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G, THWING- ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

r 26 5 111.3 79.5 .7 -1.8 1 .23 16 T "EARING STRENGTH 60 TO 1 50G.TBW INC- ELMEN DO RF( SCALE TO ICO )

t,— t a 1 1 1 .6 83. 2 3.1 1.0 1 .39 16T TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 1500, THWING-ELMENDORF< SCALE TO 10O ) l 26 = 112.5 85.3 5.4 2.6 1.13 16N TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

r 23" <=» 115.1 85.3 7.2 .7 1 .0 7 16R TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G.THWI MG- ELMENDORF. DIGITAL READOUT M2 2 r 1 15.9 93. 4 6.7 -1.4 1.C7 16C TEARING STRENGTH 6. TO 150G. , THWING-ELMENDORF (W.AIR CLAMP

)

t 24 6 1 16.3 86.6 8.9 1.0 .84 16 J TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 1SOG. ' LORENTZ-WETTRES

T " 35 * 116.4 84.4 7.7 -.8 1.18 16T TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G. THWING- EL MENDORF( SCALE TO 100 ) M fe 1 17.6 34.0 8.5 -1.9 1.C4 16N TEARING. STRENGTH 60 TO 150G. THWING-ELMENDORF. NO CUT OUT

I 234 117.6 38. 7 11.2 1.9 1.37 16N TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO, 150G, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

r 225 119.2 36.5 11.2 -.9 .79 16N TEARING STRENGTH 60 Tfl” 150G, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT L122N 12*.

1

37.5 12.6 -.S 1 .07 16N TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO ISOG, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

r .26" 122.4 94.5 18.5 3. a 1 .38 16N TEARING STRENGTH 60 TO 150G, THWING-ELMENDORF, NO CUT OUT

T "30 * 160.2 127.3 68.4 8.0. .80 16R TEARING S"RENGTH 60 "0 1500, THWING- ELMENDORF .DIGITAL READflf- OVEAK*

:

109.7 80.5 1 .00 95* ELLIPSE: 19.8 3.2 WITH GAMMA - 36 DEGREES

20
MILLINE

WT

0N

600

650

700

750

800

850

900

950

TEARING STRENGTH, PACKAGING PAPERS

LO

CD

O

cn

LO

OD

“ CO

7Z O

CC CO

Cd

CD

LOO

o

LO

CO

90 95 100 105 1 10 1 15 120 125 130

GRAMS

900 950

T 1050 '

1 150

T 1250

MILLINEWT0N

SAMPLE K50 = 110.

SAMPLE KS0 ^ 1076

X X

GRAMS

M ILL I NEWTON

l

SAMPLE G49 = 81

.

SAMPLE G49 = 790

4 * L

GRAMS

M I LL I NEWTON

I

05 NQT IN GRAN0 MEANS

•*3- CD ANALYSIS T16-1

LU

_JcuCE

CO

"E o + o

o

o 0

o

Q

O

©

0 ©

0

SnriPLE K50

21
RFpnOT N0. 65 S TAPPI CGLLABflRATT VB REFERENCE PRflGRAM ANALYSIS T19-1 TABLE 1 TENSILE BREAKING STRENGTH, KIL0NEWTONS PER METES - PRIMARILY PACKAGING PAPERS

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHODS T404 8S-76 AND T494 03-70, PENDULUM AND CPE TYPES

APRIL 1*380

* AB SAMPLE

G38 KRAFT ENVELOPE123 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

SAMPLE

G49 KRAFT COATING BASE

96 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

TEST D. - 20 conn MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

1 1 06 1 1 .64 . 1 1 .25 .52 1.00 10.62 .18 .46 .47 1.16 19A 0 L 106

LI 0" 12.63 1.10 2.58 .43 .82 11.01 .56 1 .45 1.31 3.26 19A * LIU’

1122 1 1 .28 -.25 -.58 .31 .6 1 10.11 -.34 -.88 .36 .88 19A (

1

L 122 MS 1 12.21 .68 1.58 .42 .82 10.69 .25 .65 .62 1 .54 19A 0 L 15 1

T

1 57A 11.41 -.12 -.28 .52 1.01 10.37 -.08 -.20 .31 .76 19P a L1S7A

I 157- 11.24 -.29 -.67 .62 1.19 8.85 -1 .60 -4.16 .51 1 .26 1 9A X LIST! L16T 73.39 61.86 144.46 2.55 4.93 64. C3 53.59 139.43 1.88 4.66 190 « L 167

T 182- 11.53 .00 .00 .51 .98 10.46 .01 .03 .28 .70 19D a L 132!

: i °2L 11.21 -.32 -.75 .43 .82 10.10 -.34 -.89 .34 .84 19T a L182L

L21TA 12.19 .66 1 . 54 .43 .82 10.65 .20 .52 .33 .82 19A 0 L217A

'21-° 1 1 .4C -.13 -.30 .61 1.18 10.09 -.35 -.92 .45 1.11 1 SP a L217P

12 19 12.37 .84 1.96 .39 .74 11.13 .6*= 1.79 .32 .79 1 9E 0 L 2 1

9

122 5 1 1 .95 .42 .97 .50 .97 10.79 .34 .90 .48 1.20 19P L 225

L231 1 1.40 -.13 -. 31 .61 1.17 10.44 -.01 -.02 .34 .83 19P a L 23 1 12 3-

A

11.21 -.32 -.74 .74 1.43 10.72 .27 .70 .54 1 .35 19Q 0 L237A

123-3 1 1 .82 .29 .69 .64 1.25 10.32 -.13 -.34 .56 1 .40 19A 0 L23TB

T 238A 11.14 -.39 -.90 .41 .79 9.92 -.53 -1.37 .52 1 .28 19T 0 L238A

125" A 11.22 -.31 -.72 .44 .85 10.13 -.31 -.82 .75 1 .85 19P 0 L25TA

1 26 4 A 11.26 -.27 -.63 .74 1.43 9.73 -.72 -1.86 .52 1 .28 19A 0 L264A

1 264P 11.59 .-6 . 14 .51 .98 10.79 .34 .89 .28 .69 19P a L264P

1 265 12.-5 .52 1.21 .63 1.22 10.75 .31 .79 .36 .89 1 9 A 6 L 265

r 2t -T 1 1 .39 -.14 -.32 .40 .77 10.53 .08 .22 .33 .82 1 9 A a L267

* 2* 3 1 1 .30 -.23 -.54 .59 1.13 10.60 .15 .40 .60 1 .49 1 9 A a 1273

12*4 11.40 -.13 -.31 .31 .60 10.32 -.12 -.32 .36 .90 1 9P a L274

L2"8 10.70 -.83 -1.94 .43 .84 1 0.0T -.37 -.97 .26 .65 19A a L278

T 280 10.91 -.62 -1.45 .67 1.20 9.99 -.46 -1.19 .49 1 .21 1 9G a L280

12 81 1 1 .’8 .25 .58 .56 1 . 08 10.69 .25 .64 .42 1 .04 19G a L281 1305 11.19 -.34 -.81 .41 .80 9.73 -.7 1 -1.85 .37 .92 19P a L305

’312 1 1 .36 -.17 -.39 .76 1.47 10.59 . 1 4 .37 .46 1 .IS 19D a L 3 1 2 13 1 8 1 1.02 -.51 -1.19 .23 .45 9.96 -.49 -1.27 .27 .68 19G a 1219

1 324 1 1 .60 .07 . 17 .77 1.49 10.69 .25 .64 .34 .84. 19A a L 324 1334 1 1 .60 .07 . 16 .50 .96 10.58 .14 .36 .31 .76 19P a L334

1336 1 1 .88 .35 .83 .58 1.12 10.85 .4 1 1.06 .40 l .00 19G a L 336

13 56 1 1 .to .17 .39 .62 1.20 10.83 .38 .99 .98 1.19 19P a L 356 1565 1 1.23 -.30 -.70 .34 .66 10.29 -.15 -.40 .26 .65 19T a L 565

15 6 8 11.19 -.34 -.79 .50 .97 10. 2T -.18 -.47 .48 1 .20 19P a L 56 0 15-5 11.76 .17 .39 .46 .89 10.47 .02 .06 .29 .72 19G a L575

T 5-6 11.46 -.07 -.15 .47 .9 1 10.45 .01 .02 .21 .51 19A a 1576

1.5 8 0 12.31 .78 1.82 .32 .61 10.92 .47 1 .23 .28 .70 19G a L580

1581 1 1 .67 .14 .32 .76 1.48 1 0.67 .23 .59 .40 1.00 1 9A a ise 1 ’604 12.02 .49 1 . 14 .65 1.25 9.74 -.71 -1.35 1.08 2 .67 1 9 A X L6C 4 L6 * 6 1" .88 -.65 -1.52 .38 .74 9.94 -.SI - 1.32 .25 .63 19P a L606

16 16 1 1.33 -.20 -.47 .44 . 86 10.10 -.34 -.89 .27 .66 1 9 A a L61 0 L622 1 1.34 -. 19 -. 45 .59 1.15 10.89 .45 1.16 .51 1 .27 19fl a L622

L6 50 11.41 -.12 -.28 .83 1.6 1 10.31 -.14 -.36 .58 1 .45 19G a L 65 0 1652 1 1 .78 .25 .57 .59 1.14 10 .72 .27 .TO .47 1.18 19A a 1652

1676 1 l.=>3 .40 .93 .66 1.28 10.55 .10 .27 .51 1 .27 1 9 A a L676

16 8 4 1 1.30 -.23 -.53 .27 .53 10.20 -.25 -.64 .29 .72 19W a L 684 L689 11.13 -.40 -.94 .46 .90 10.21 -.24 -.62 .49 1 .21 19A a 1689

1-- 2 11.34 .31 .73 .71 1.37 10.63 .19 .49 .65 1 .62 19P a L702

L"3C 10.34 -.69 - 1 .62 .45 .88 9.34 -1.11 -2.89 .27 .66 19A • L73C

1" 3 5 10.89 -.64 -1.49 .46 . 89 10.09 -.36 -.93 .39 .96 19A 0 L735

* — 3 7 A 12.07 .54 1 .26 .44 .85 10.87 .42 1.09 .27 • 66 1 9 A a LT37A

1-37B 12.04 .51 1.20 .45 .88 1.64 -8.81 -22.91 .14 .35 1 9 A * L7373

T ”60A 12.19 .66 1 .53 .42 .81 10.99 .55 1.42 .35 .88 19A a L 76 ** A 1-6 OB 1 1 .74 .21 .49 .55 1 • C 7 1 1 .03 .58 1.51 .27 .67 19P a L76C3

op. . 11.53 KTLeNERTfl*j/M ?D MEANS - .43 KIL0NEWT3N/M

AVERAGE SDR - OR. MEAN * 65.85 LB/INCB

GRAND MEAN - 10.45 KIL«NERTON/M

SD OF MEANS - .38 KILONEWTON/M

.52 K I L ONE WT ON/M AVERAGE SDR GRAND MEAN * 59.66 LB/INCH

TEST DETERMINATIONS - 2* 52 LABS IN GRAND MEANS

.40 KILONEWTON/M

1250"

Xfl'TJlT 10.38 •1.15 •2.69 .36 TMBER OF LABORATORIES REPORTING

Best values: G38 11.5 G49 10.5

0.7 kllonewton per meter

0.6 kllonewton per meter

The followin'* laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 737B.

Data from the following laboratories appear Co be off by a multiplicative factor: 167.

.70

57

9 .40

22

-1.05 •2.73 .21 .51
FEPf'R” NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM april i sec ANALYST 3 119-1 TABLE 2 TEN9TLE BREAKING STRENGTH, KILONEWTONS PEP METES - PRIMARILY PACKAGING PAPERS

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHODS T404 03-76 AND T494 03-70, PENDULUM AND CPE TYPES

MEANS COORDINATES AVG

DE F G3B G49 MAJOR MINOR S. SDR VAR PROPERTY-- -TEST INSTRUMENT- —COND I TION S

T P5C’ 10.38 9.40 -1 .56 -.04 .61 19L TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, CRE. 20 C . 65* 1 T.2 7 8 A 10.70 10.07 -.87 .27 .75 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE )

T -30 * 1C. 64 9.34 -1.25 -.38 .77 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) L 6C ft A 10.88 9.94 -.83 .OS .68 19P ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/ IN

,

PENDULUM TESTER

1.7 3 5 A 10.89 10.09 -.72 .15 .93 1 9 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN, LOAD CEIL ( CPE )

L2“0 A 10.51 9.99 -.77 .06 1 .25 19G TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL (CPE ) *316 A 11.02 5.96 -.70 -.03 .57 19G TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 9 74 LB/ IN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) T ft 39 A 11.13 10.21 -.46 .09 1 .05 19A ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) T 2 36 A A 11.14 9.92 -.64 -.14 1.04 19T TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. PENDULUM TESTER

L3C5 A 11.19 = .73 -.73 -.31 .86 19P TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 5 74 Lfl/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

I 566 e 11 . 1 = 10 .27 -.37 .09 l .08 19P TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LH/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

T.1P2 T

. A 11.21 10.10 -.47 -.05 .83 19T TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

7.2 3-

it 1 1.21 10.72 -.06 .41 1 .39 1 9Q ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

7.2 S’* A A 1 1 .22 10.13 -.44 -.04 1 .35 19P TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

T 565 A 1 1 .23 10.29 -.32 .08 .66 19T TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. PENDULUM TESTER

7 lbT’’ X 11.24 8.85 -1.27 -1.02 1 .23 1 9A TENSILE 9TRENGTH, 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE 1 7 26 4

A 11.26 9.73 -.67 -.36 1 .35 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE ) LI 22 A l 1 .28 10.11 -.41 -.09 .74 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 0 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) t 2- 3 A 1 1 .30 10.60 -.07 .27 1 .31 19A TENS!LB STRENGTH, 31 0 74 Lfl/IN

,

LOAD CELL (CRE ) Lt P4 A 11.30 10.20 -.33 -.04 .63 19W TEN9ILB STRENGTH. 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) ’610 A l 1 .33 10 .10 -.38 -.13 .76 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 7 6 22 A 11.34 10.89 .15 .46 1 .21 196 TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

T 312 A 11.36 10.59 -.03 .21 1 .31 1 9D ENSILB STRENGTH. 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LeAD CELL (CRE ) 7.2 6 t A 1 1 .39 10.53 -. 05 .15 .80 1 9 A TENSILE STRENGTH. 31 TO 74 ta/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 7 231 A 11.40 10.44 -.10 .08 1.00 19P TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 4 LB/IN. PENDULUM ESTER

' 2" 4 A 11.40 10 .32 -. 18 -.01 .75 19P TENSILE STPENGTH, 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN, PENDULUM TE3TER

T 21"P A 11.40 10.09 -.33 -.18 1.14 19P TENSILE STRENGTH. 31 TO 74 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

76 5 0 A 11.41 10.31 -. 1 8 -.02 1 .53 19G ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 7 1 5-A a 11.41 10.37 -.14 .02 .89 19P TENSILE STRENGTH. 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN

,

PENDULUM -ESTER

7.5-6 A 11.46 10.45 -.04 .05 .71’ 19A ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 0 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL < CRE )

7. 1 “27 A 11.53 10 .46 .01 .01 .84 1 9D TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 7.2 64P A 1 1 .59 10.79 .27 .22 .83 1 9 P ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 lb/in. PENDULUM TESTER

L334 A 1 1 .60 10.58 .14 .06 .86 19P TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, PENDULUM TBSTEH

73 2 4 A 11.60 10.69 .22 . 14 1 .17 1 9 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 0 4 LB/IN, L 6 AD CELL ( C=E ) ' 1C 6 A 1 1 .64 10.62 .20 .06 1 .08 1 9 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/ IN, LOAD CELL ( CEE )

7.5 “ 1 A l 1 .67 10.67 .25 .08 1 .24 19 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 4 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) ’356 A 1 1 .TO 10.83 .38 . 18 1.19 19P TENSILE STRENGTH. 31 TO T4 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTEP

7 5-5 A 1 1 .70 10.47 .14 -.09 .81 190 TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 -fl 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 7-6 03 A 11.74 11.03 .54 .30 .87 19P ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. PENDULUM TESTER

7.6f 2 A 1 1.78 10.72 .36 .04 1 . 16 1 9 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE )

7.2 61 A 1 1 .-8 1C .69 .35 .02 1 .06 19G TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE )

7. 2 3 — B 11.32 10.32 . 14 -.29 1 .32 19A ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) L" 0 2 A 11.84 10.63 .36 -.06 1 .49 1 9R TENSILE STPENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, PENDULUM ESTER

L336 6 11.88 10.85 .54 .07 1 .06 19G ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) L6-6 A 11.93 10.55 .37 -.18 1 .27 1 9 A TENSILE STRENGTH. 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE )

7.2 2 5 e 11.95 10.79 . 54 -.01 1 .09 19P TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 4 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L6C4 X 12.02 9.74 -.10 -.85 1 .96 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) L-3-B * 12.04 1 .6* -5.40 -6.97 .61 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 7 26 5 A 12.05 10.75 .59 -.11 l .05 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE ) P3’A A 12.07 1 o.e7 .68 • O .76 1 9 A ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) L-6 0A A 12.19 10.99 . 85 -.02 .84 19A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 4 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( C”E ) 72 17A A 12.19 10.65 .63 -.28 .82 19A ENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 7.15 1 A 12.21 10.69 .67 -.26 1.13 19A TENSILE STPENGTH. 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) T.5 3 0 A 12.31 10.92 .90 -.16 .66 190 TEN3ILB STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 Lfl/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 12 15 A 12.37 11.13 1.09 -.03 .77 l 9E TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRB )

1 1 0- * 12.63 1 1 .C 1 1.20 -.30 2.04 1 9 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE )

T 167 « 73.35 64.03 81.34 -.29 4.79 19G TENSILE STRENGTH, 31 TO 74 LB/IN

,

LOAD CELL ( CRE ) GMLAVS

11.53 10.45 1 .00 55* ELITPSE: 1 .39 .47 WITH GAMMA - 41 DEGREES

23
K1L0NEUT0N/M

TENSILE STRENGTH PACKAGING PAPERS

SAMPLE G38 = 11.5 KIL0NEWT0N/M SAMPLE G49 = 10-4 K I L0NEWT0N/M

SAMPLE G38 = 65.8 LB/INCH SAMPLE G49 = 59-7 LB/INCH

58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74

LB/INCH

24
°EPORT Nf. 653 TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS T20-1 TABLE 1 TENSILE BRBAKING STRENGTH, KILONEWTONS PER METER - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T494 "3-70, CONSTANT RATE OF ELONGATION APPARATUS

SAMPLE ENVELOPB SAMPLE COATED OFFSET BOOK TEST D.* 20 LAB G40 88 GRAMS PER SQUARE METEP G33 75 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

CODE MEAN DBV N.DEV SDR P. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

1105 4.66 .06 .20 .24 . 85 3.98 .09 .44 .18 .98 20 A a L 105

T

.l 15 4.60 -.20 -.70 .29 1.03 3.79 -.10 -.52 .22 1.18 20D 0 LI 15

T. 1 IP 4.90 . 1 0 .36 .25 .89 4.05 .16 .83 .11 .60 20 A a L 1 1 8

T 122 4.60 -.20 -.72 .27 .94 3.85 -.04 -.19 .13 .70 20A a L 1 22

t 1 24C 4.34 .04 . 14 .24 . 83 3.96 .07 .37 .14 .74 20 A a L124C

I 1 25 4.95 .15 .53 .28 .98 3.79 -.10 -.52 .24 1.31 20C a L 1 25

LI 31 4.9C .19 .67 .40 1.37 3.92 .03 .15 .19 1 .00 20E a L 13 1 L14 1” 5.05 .25 .87 • 24- .85 3.99 .10 .52 .17 .91 20A a L 14 IT

l 1 43 5.59 .79 2.77 .33 1.17 4.10 .21 1.10 .23 1 .26 2CE * L 143

LI 46 4.38 ,oe . 28 .26 .93 3.99 .10 .52 .14 .76 20 A a L 1 48

1155 5.19 .39 1 .39 .31 1.09 4.25 .35 1.32 .16 .83 20B a L 1S5

T 1 5e 4. SI .01 .05 .15 .54 3.93 .04 .19 .08 .46 20 A a L 1 5°

’ 163 4.95 .19 .69 .29 1.01 4.14 .25 1.26 .13 .71 20D a L 163

T 1 6? 5.42 .62 2.21 .32 1.13 4.36 .47 2.43 .13 .70 290 a L 1 6 T

LI "6 4.30 -.50 -1.77 .32 1.11 3.55 -.34 -1.73 .23 1 .25 20E a L 176 MFE 4.86 .03 .29 .25 .89 3.80 -.09 -.48 .19 1.01 20C a L 1 95

Ll e 4 4 .67 -.13 -.44 .3* 1.19 3.83 -.06 -.32 .15 .80 2C A a L 1 94

L 21 1 4.53 -.27 -.96 .34 1.21 3.14 -.75 -3.83 .40 2.17 20C X L21

r.223B 4 .73 -.07 -.23 .28 1.00 3.31 -.08 -.40 .14 .77 20A a L223B

L226C 4.43 -.37 -1.32 .25 .89 3.48 -.4 1 -2.09 .21 1.13 20C a I226C

T 23" 4.59 -.21 -.75 .18 .64 3.81 -.08 -.40 .11 .6 1 200 a I 230

T

. 25 5 4.75 -.05 -.19 .30 1.05 3.54 -.35 -1.79 .33 1 .76 20A a I 25S

L26' 4.72 -,oe -.29 .13 .47 3.70 -.19 -.96 .13 .71 20 A + L 26 0

T 2t 1 4.72 -.08 -.27 .19 .68 3.74 -.15 -.76 .24 1 .28 2 OA a I 261

1.241 4.61 -.15 -.68 .28 1 .00 3.75 -.14 -.73 .21 1.13 20A a L 29 1

L3 09 4.86 .06 .20 .23 .99 3.96 .07 .37 .20 1 .07 20E a L 309

T 315 4.45 -.35 -1.23 .29 1 . 02 3.83 - .06 -.31 .16 .84 20 A a L 3 1

L3 1 6 4.49 -.31 -1.11 .29 1.01 3.75 -.14 -.72 .09 .46 20G a L313

L3 2 5 4.52 -. 2 e -1.00 .47 1.65 3.84 -.05 -.25 .14 .75 20E a L225

*228 .31 - 3.99 1 • 00 .05 . 13 .66 -3.23 - 16.54 .03 . 17 2CA « I 320

T 323 4.73 -.57 -.26 .23 .82 3.65 -.24 -1.21 .29 1 .54 2CA a L 333 L344 4.31 .01 .0 4 .23 . 83 3.80 -.09 -.48 .22 1.17 20 A a L344

L356 4.31 .01 .04 .23 .82 3.89 -.00 -.00 .14 .74 20 A a L356

r 36<* 4.69 1 1 -.41 .26 .52 3.99 .10 .49 .14 .75 2<*B a L 360

L37 6 4. = 2 . 1

.42 .78 2.7 3 3.97 .0 8 .41 .19 1 .05 20A a L376

L3?6 4.83 .03 . 1 1 .34 1.18 3.98 .09 .48 .17 .94 29E a L386

L3=0 5.13 .33 1.13 .35 1.2S 4.12 .23 1.16 .30 1 .62 2CA a L39C

1442 4.38 -.42 -1.48 .20 .71 3.75 -.14 -.70 .11 .56 2PG a L442

T 557 4.72 -.oe -.28 .29 1 . 04 3.89 -.00 -.02 .11 .62 20A ,* L 557 L563 5.41 .6 1 2.17 .32 1.14 3.80 -.10 -.49 .33 1 .79 20 A X L563

l 567 4.73 -.07 -.24 .23 .81 3.61 -.28 -1.46 .34 1 .8 1 2CA a L567

15*4 4.96 .16 .55 .25 .85 3.99 .10 .50 .25 1.35 20A a L 57 4 1.575 4.70 -.10 -.34 .23 .80 4.00 . 1 1 .56 .13 .70 20 G a 1575

1592 4.7C -.0 1 -.04 .26 .90 3.99 .10 .49 .18 .96 20A a 1592

16 16 4.33 .03 . 10 .07 .23 4.12 .22 1.15 .03 .15 20 D a L616

7 6 92 4.86 .06 .20 .20 .97 3.90 .0 1 .05 .21 1.11 20A a L 692

16 = ? 4.35 .05 .13 .22 .79 3.30 -.09 -.46 .24 1 .31 20E a L 698

1.705 3.09 -1.71 -6.04 .23 .97 2 .40 -1.49 -7.65 .29 l .55 20A * L705

7706 5.19 .35 1.39 .33 1.15 3.89 -.00 -.03 .33 1.75 20E a L 70 6 L~32 1.00 -3.80 - 13.42 .10 .37 .73 -3.16 - 16.20 .08 .45 20A * L732

L734 5.06 .26 .53 .28 1.00 4.0 1 .12 .63 .20 1 .08 20E a L734

7736 4.42 -.35 -1.36 .22 .78 3.78 -.11 -.58 .10 .54 20A a L736

7738 4.33 -.47 -1.65 .37 1.29 3.89 -.00 -.01 .19 1 .02 20 A a L738

t.743 5.09 .29 1 . 04 .33 1.16 4.20 .31 1.57 .10 .55 29E a L743

1*44 4.97 .17 .60 .56 1.97 3.74 -.15 -.79 .70 3.74 20A a L744 L~57 4.10 -.70 -2.49 .25 . 86 3.49 -.40 -2.06 .14 .77 20A a L757

L760A 5.32 .52 i.e4 .29 1.0 1 4.37 .48 2.46 .13 .69 20 A a L76CA

O'?. MEAN • 4.30 KILONEPTflN/M GRAND MEAN - 3.89 KTLSNEWTflN/M TEST DETERMINATIONS • 20 SD MEANS .28 KIL9NEPT9N/M SD OF MEANS - .20 KIL0NEPTON/M 52 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDR • .28 KILONEWTON/M AVERAGE SDR - .19 KILONEPTON/M

OP . ME AN •16.190 LB/15 MM GRAND MEAN -13.122 LB/15 MM

I 139 4.73 -.f*7 -.25 .26 . 90 3.77 -.12 -.60 .15 .32 20H LI 39

T 257*7 4 .20 -.60 -2. 13 .20 .70 3.50 -.39 -2.00 .12 .64 20L L 2507 TMTAT N'JMBER OF LABORATORIES REPORTING • 5*

Best values : GAO 4 .8 ± 0.5 kilonewton per meter

G33 3 .9 ± 0.3 kilonewton per meter 25

Data from the following laboratories appear to be otf by a multiplicative factor: 328, 705, 732.
P£P^9-r vfl. 65.3 TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALTST3 T20-1 TABLE 2 TENSILE BREAKING STRENGTH. KIL0NEW"8NS PER METER - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T494 OS-TO. CONSTANT RATB OF ELONGATION APPARATUS

LAB

c«PE F MEAV9040 G33 COORDINATESMAJOR MINOR

AVG

R. SDR VAR PROPERTY TEST INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS

L328 * .81 .66 -5.09 -.68 .17 20 A TENSILE STRENG1H, 1* TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) L73 2 * 1.00 .73 -4.89 -.73 .41 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 lb/in. LOAD CELL (CPE ) L7 0S « 3 .09 2.40 -2.24 -.39 1 .26 20 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) '.75’ a 4. 10 3.49 -.81 .02 .82 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN

,

LOAD CELL ( CRE ) r 250’ 4.20 3.50 -.72 -.02 .67 20 L TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, CRE, 20 C, 65% RH

I J 76 <* 4.30 3.55 -.60 -.03 1.18 20 E TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 IB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) L738 a 4.33 3.85 — • 4G .24 1.15 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) ’.44 2 a 4.38 3.75 -.43 . 10 .64 20G TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) L736 ft 4 .42 3.78 -.39 . 10 .66 20 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) I 2 26C Q 4.43 3.48 -.53 -. 15 1 .01 20C TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 1315 A 4 .45 3.83 -.33 .13 .93 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRE 1 13 1° A 4.49 3.75 -.34 .04 .73 20G TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) L32 5 a 4.52 3.84 -.27 .10 1 .20 20E TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) L2 1 1 X 4.53 3. 1 4 -.62 -.50 1 .69 20C "ENSILE S"PENGTH. 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) I 2 3C a 4.59 3.81 -.22 .04 .63 208 TENSILE S"RENGTH, 14 "0 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 1122 ft 4 .60 3.85 -. 19 .07 .82 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) 1115 a 4.60 3.79 -.22 .02 1.11 20D TENSILE S"RENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE ) I 2° l d 4.61 3.75 -.24 -.02 1 .06 20 A "ENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 1194 4.67 3.83 -.14 .01 1.00 20A TEN9ILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE ) 1360 a 4.69 3.99 -.05 .14 .84 20B TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 "0 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 1575 A 4.70 4.00 -.03 . 14 .75 20G TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/TN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) 12 6 0 5 4. 72 3.70 -.17 -.12 .59 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 1557 Ck 4.72 3.89 -.07 .04 .83 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE ) 1261 A 4. ’2 3.74 -.14 -.09 .58 20 A TENSILE STRENGTH. 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CRE ) 1323 4.73 3.65 -.19 -.16 1.18 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE )

11 39 4.73 3.77 -.12 -.06 .86 20H TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, CRE, SHOP" "EST SPAN 1567 A 4.73 3.61 -.21 -.21 1 .31 20 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 "0 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 1223B A 4.73 3.81 -.10 -.03 .89 20 A TENSILB STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE ) 1255 A 4.75 3.54 -.23 -.27 1 .40 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 1592 A 4.75 3.99 .04 .09 .93 20A "ENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE )

13 56 A 4.81 3.89 .Cl -.Cl .78 20A TENSILE STPENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 134 4 ft 4.51 3.P0 -.04 -.09 1 .00 20 A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) LI 59 4.81 3.93 .03 .02 .50 20A "ENSILE 3"RENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE > 16 1

1

A 4.83 4.12 .14 .18 .19 20D TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 "O 40 LB/IN

,

LOAD CELL (CPE ) i3ee A 4.83 3.58 .08 .06 1.06 20 E "ENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, L"AD CELL ( CPE )

11 24<- fit 4 .84 3.56 .07 .04 .79 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) T 698 4.95 3.80 -.00 -.10 1 .05 20E TENSILE STRENG"H, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 13 05 A 4.86 3.56 .09 .03 1.03 20E TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 T" 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE ) 1692 a 4.86 3.90 .05 -.02 1.04 20 A TENSILE S"RENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CRE ) 1105 a 4.86 3.9e .09 .04 .92 20 A "ENSILE STRENGTH, 14 "8 40 LB/IN

,

LOAD CELL ( CRE )

11 4e A 4.88 3.59 . 12 .05 .84 2CA TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) : 1 es A 4.88 3.80 .02 -.12 .95 20C TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 "0 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE } Ll 18 A 4.90 4.05 .17 .08 .74 20A TENSILE STRENG"H, 14 "0 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL (CPE ) 13* 6 A 4.52 3.97 .14 .01 1.39 20A TENSILE S"PENGTH. 1 4 TO 40 LB/TN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 1125 A 4.55 3.79 .08 -.17 1.15 20C TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/ IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 1574 A 4.56 3.95 .18 .00 1.12 20 A TENSILE STRENGTH. 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) L744 <9 4. 97 3.74 .07 -.22 2.85 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 "0 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) ! 131 A 4.59 3.92 .18 -.07 1 .20 20E TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 116 3 A 4.99 4. 14 .29 .11 .86 20D TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 11 4 1*7 A 5.0S 3.99 .26 -.04 .88 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 lb/in. LOAD CELL (CPE ) 1*3 4

a 5.06 4.0 1 .29 -.03 1 .04 20 E TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 1743 A 5.09 4.20 .41 .11 .86 20E "ENSILE STRENGTH, 14 "0 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 1350 A 5.13 4.12 .40 .02 1 .44 20A TENSILE STPENGTH, 14 "0 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 17 C6 A 5.19 3.89 .33 -.21 1 .45 20E TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/ IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE ) Ll 55 A 5.19 4.25 .32 .10 .99 20B TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE )

17 6 CA A 5.32 4.37 .69 . 14 .35 20A TENSILE STPENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CRE ) L563 X 5.41 3.80 .47 -.40 1 .47 20A TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN. LOAD CELL ( CPE ) 1167 A 5.42 4.36 .78 .08 .92 20G TBNSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) Ll 43 5.59 4.10 .73 -.23 1.21 20E TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, LOAD CELL ( CPE ) GMEANS

:

4.80 3.89

95% BLLTPSE: .83 .29

1 .00 WITH GAMMA • 31 DEGREES

26
TENSILE STR . , CRE . PRINTING PAPERS

SAMPLE G40 = 4.80 KIL0NEWT0N/M SAMPLE G33 = 3-89 K [ L0NEWT0N/M

SAMPLE G40 = 16-19 LB/15 MM SAMPLE G33 = 13-12 LB/15 MM

LD

i ~~ <

CD

O

CD

O

LD

'

O

O

CO

o

CxJ

o

o

KIL0NENTQN/N

i r i r

1 1 1 13-5 14.5 15-5 16-5 17-5 18-5 19-5

LB/15 MM

27
NO. fc5S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS T20-2 TABLE 1 TENSILE BREAKING STRENGTH. KILONEWTONS PER METER - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T404 0S-T6, PENDULUM-TYPE TESTER

SAMPLE ENVELOPE SAMPLE COATED OFFSET B00K TEST D.* 2C

t AB 040 88 GRAMSi PER SQUARE METER G33 75 GRAMS PER SQUAPE ME^ER

r.*D E MEAN DEV N.DEV 9DR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

LI 03 4.65 -.24 -.87 .16 .59 4.08 .16 .62 .10 .54 20R a L 103 Lice 4.95 .06 .22 .19 .70 3.82 -.09 -.35 .26 1 .40 20 P a I 1C8

Ll 21 4.64 -.25 -.90 .29 1 . 06 3.79 -.12 -.45 .18 .95 20P 6 1121 1124° 4.06 - .03 -.09 .29 1 . 07 3.50 -.41 -1.57 .26 1 .40 20 P a L124P

Ll 2 6 4.83 -.05 -.20 .26 .94 3.81 -.10 -.39 .18 .95 20T a L12e

’ 1 4? 4 .64 -.25 -.92 .21 .77 3.71 -.21 -.78 .17 .90 20 P a L 148

1 1 53 5.18 .29 1.35 .24 .87 4.14 .23 .89 .20 1 .09 20P a L 1 S3

' • t 2 4.61 -.28 -1.00 .23 1 . 04 3.72 -.19 -.73 .23 1 .22 20V a L 162 ?2L 4.92 . 03 . 12 .33 1.19 4.05 .14 .52 .16 .85 20T a L182L

L 1 *3 5.08 . I 9 .70 .40 1.48 4.07 .16 .61 .21 1.13 20P a L 1 83

I 1 89 5 . OC . 1 1 .39 .25 .90 4.13 .21 .82 .15 .78 20 R a L 189 11°1P 4.90 .01 . 04 .22 .82 4.01 .10 .38 .14 .78 20 P a L 19 1 P L21 2 4.81 -.08 -.30 .39 1.44 3.92 .01 .05 .08 .45 20 R a L 21 2

1.21 3 4.87 -.02 -.07 .39 1.41 3.74 -.17 -.64 .29 1 .53 20T a L213

t 218 4.85 -.04 -.16 .23 .85 4.04 .12 .47 .10 .55 20 P a L 21 8

L223 5.10 .21 .78 .30 1.08 4.26 .35 1.33 .17 .90 2 00 a L233

L234 5.13 .24 .87 .21 .77 3.55 -.36 -1.36 .19 1 .00 20P * L 234 L241 4.21 -.6e -2.49 .22 .80 3.25 -.66 -2.51 .15 .83 20 R * I 24 1 L24 2 4.53 -.36 -1.31 .14 .SI 3.68 -.23 -.37 .23 1 .25 20Y a L242

T24C 4.94 .05 . 18 .32 1.19 4.02 .1 1 .42 .19 1 .0 1 20 P a I 249

f.25C 5. 38 .50 1.80 .33 1.21 4.29 .38 1.44 .14 .75 20 P a L 259

T Zt 2 4.95 .06 .22 .31 1.13 4.20 .29 1.11 .13 .69 20R a L262

T

. 2" 4 4.92 .03 .12 .13 .48 3.89 -.03 -.10 .07 .37 20P a I 274 1275 4.52 -.37 -1 .34 .32 1.17 3.46 -.46 -1.73 .18 .95 20 R a L275

L2'? P 5.43 .54 l .98 .34 1.25 4.19 .28 1.06 .16 .85 20 P a L2T<?P

T 28 5 4 .

3

A -.59 -2. 15 .23 1.02 3.77 -.14 -.54 .13 .M 20P * L285

! 29C 4 .69 -.20 -.72 .24 .83 3.68 -.23 -.87 .25 1 .36 20P a L290

T 31

1

4 .7 1 -.18 -.65 .28 1.03 3.90 -.01 -.02 . 16 .85 20V L31

1

1313 3.68 - 1.21 1 *0 .20 .72 3.03 -.88 -3.35 .14 .74 20T « L313

L321 4.63 -.26 -.93 .21 .78 3. 50 -.41 -1.57 .16 .87 2PQ a L321

L3 3" 5.17 .28 1 .02 .34 1.25 4.21 .30 1.13 .20 1 .07 20P a 1330

1-337 24.95 20.07 73. OS 1.77 6.46 20 .29 16.38 62.22 1 .20 6 .44 20V * L 337

! 356 5.24 .35 1.28 .34 1.23 4.09 .17 .66 .20 1 .10 20P a L356

L36 6 5.1 8 .29 1.05 .24 .88 3.7S -.16 -.60 .44 2 .38 20P a L366

I 393 4.85 -.03 -. 13 .24 .89 4.00 .09 .35 .13 .72 20P a L393

T.48 4 3.78 -1.11 -4.04 .17 .63 4 .48 .56 2.14 .20 1 .09 20U « L4e4

L556 5.30 .4 1 1.48 .46 1 .68 4.1 1 .19 .74 .43 2.32 2CP a L 556

L59 9 4.73 -.16 -.58 .39 1.44 3.61 -.30 -1.13 .30 1 .59 20 V a L599

T 625 4.75 -.14 -.51 .31 1.12 3.56 -.35 -1.32 .22 1.18 20P a L625

L6 26 5.03 .14 .51 .23 .85 4.27 .36 1.38 .11 .59 20T a L626

T 6»0 5.16 .27 .99 .19 .7 1 4.16 .25 .94 .15 .82 20R a L680

7 6 85 4.75 -.14 -.51 .18 .6’ 3.97 .06 .22 .17 .91 20 Y a L685

77 14 4.87 -.02 -.08 .19 .69 4.08 .17 .63 .15 .79 20 P a L714

1754 4.59 -.30 -1.10 .18 .66 3.71 -.20 -.76 .11 .61 207 a L754

L75° 5.17 .28 1.01 .27 1.01 4.20 .29 1.09 .15 .82 20P a L759

L -6 0B 5.22 .33 1.22 .29 • o CD 4.29 .38 1.44 .14 .73 20 P a L7COB

G». MEAN 4.89 KTL0NEMT3N/M GRAND MEAN - 3.91 KIIONEWTON/M TEST DETERMINATIONS • 20

<?D MFANS • .27 KILONER'T'Jjj/k SD OF MEANS • .26 SILONEWTON/M 43 LABS IN GRAND MEANS

AVERAGE SDR • .27 KILONEWTON/M AVERAGE SDR • .19 KILONENTflN/M

r-? . WEAN •16.490 LB/ 15 MM GRAND MEAN •13.191 LB/15 MM

T^TAI NUMBER OF LABORATORIES REPORTING • 46

Bps; .’elues: G40 4.9 ± 0.5 kilonewton per meter

G33 3.9 ± 0.4 kilonewton per meter

The followin'’ j. boratoriea were omitted from the grand means be.au;e of extreme test results: 313, 484.

Data from the following laboratories appear to be off by a multiplicative factor: 337.

28
RFPAR” NO. 65.S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS 120-2 TABLE 2

’’’ENSILE BREAKING STRENGTH, KIL0NEW”ONS PER METER - PRIMARILY PRINTING PAPERS

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T404 OS-76, PBNDULUM-TYPE TESTER

’ AB CODE F MEANS

040 033

COORDINATES

MAJOR MINOR

AVO

R. SDR VAR PROPERTY-- -TEST TNST20MENT CONDI”! ONS

’.3 13 3.6S 3.03 •1.48 .19 .73 20 T TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PEND0L0M TESTER

T 464 * 3.78 4.48 -.42 1.17 .86 200 TENSILE STPENGIH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDUL0M TESTER

1.24

« 4.21 3.25 -.98 -.01 .81 20R TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L265 • 4.30 3.77 -.53 .30 .86 20P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 ”0 40 LB/IN

,

PENDULUM TE9TER

L2” 5 (3 4.52 3.46 -.58 -.08 1 .06 20R TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/ IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L2 42 A 4.53 3.68 -.42 .08 .88 20 Y TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER VS4 4 4. 53 3.71 -.36 .06 .63 20T ’’ENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

’.162 A 4.61 3.72 -.33 .05 1.13 20V TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM ”E9TER

’.3 21 9 4.63 3.50 -.47 -.13 .82 200 TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

LI 48 A 4.64 3.71 -.33 .02 .83 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH

,

14 ”0 40 LB/IN, “ENDULUM TESTER

’121 4 4 .64 3.’9 -. 26 .08 1 .0 1 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

’.1 03 4 4.65 4.08 -.06 .28 .57 20R TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

7 2? 0 a 4.69 3.68 -.30 -.03 1.12 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 ”0 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L31 1 4 4.-M 3.90 -.13 .12 .94 20 V TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN

,

PENDULUM TESTER

L5 99 4 4.73 3 .61 -.32 -.1 1 1.51 20V TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 "0 40 LB/IN

,

PENDULUM TESTER

L685 A 4.75 3.97 - . 06 . 14 .79 20 Y TENSILE STRENGTH. 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

’.6 25 4 4,75 3.56 -.34 -.16 1 .15 20P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/ IN, PBNDULUM TESTER

T.2 12 A 4.81 3.92 -.05 .07 .94 20R ’’ENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

LI 25 4 4.83 3.81 -.11 -.04 .95 20T TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 IB/IN, PENDULUM TBSTER

’.215 *4 4.65 4. 04 .05 .12 .70 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/ IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L39 3 A 4.85 4 .0 C .04 .09 .30 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

T 1 24P A 4.36 3. SO -.30 -.28 1 .24 20P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TE9TER

’.’H 4 4.37 4.08 .10 .14 .74 20P ’’ENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN. PENDULUM TESTER

'212 A 4.3T 3.74 -.13 -.11 1 .47 20T TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 ”0 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

1151° A 4.90 4.01 .08 .07 .80 20P IENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TS 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM tester

12" 4 A 4.92 3.89 .01 - . C 4 .42 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 L3/TN

,

PENDULUM TESTER

’152’. n 4.92 4.05 .12 .08 1 .02 20T TENSILE S’-RENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN. PENDULUM TESTER

’ ?4« A 4.94 4.02 . 1 1 .05 1.10 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN

,

PENDULUM TESTES

L2£ 2 A 4.95 4.20 .24 .17 .91 20R TEN9ILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

LI 03 A 4.95 3.82 -.02 -.1 1 1 .05 20P TEN9ILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

LI 5

A 5.00 4.13 .22 .08 .84 20 R TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L 6 26 A 5.03 4.27 .35 .17 .72 20T TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 L3/IN. PENDULUM TESTER M *3 A 5.08 4.07 .25 -.02 1 .31 20P TENSILE STRENGTH. 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM ’ESTEP

’.233 4 5.10 4.26 .39 .11 • 99 20Q TENSILE strength. 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN. PENDULUM TESTER

’ 234 * 5.13 3.55 -.07 -.43 .89 20 P TENSILE strength. 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

X £ 80 4 5.16 4.16 .37 -.00 .76 20R TENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L^SP 4 5.17 4.20 .40 .02 .91 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 T5 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

1.33 0 4 5.17 4.21 .41 .02 1.16 20 P TBN9ILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

T 1 53 4 5.18 4.14 .37 -.03 .98 20P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L3t 6 4 S.18 3.75 .10 -.31 1 .63 20 P ’ENSILE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TBSTER

’."6 03 4 5.22 4.29 .50 .05 .91 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/TN, PENDULUM TESTER

’ 356 4 5.24 4.09 .38 -.1 1 1 .17 20P TENSILE strength. 1 4 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

L556 - 5.30 4.11 .43 -.14 2.00 20P TENS’LE STRENGTH, 1 4 TO 40 LB/’N. PENDULUM TESTE R

L 2 55 A 5. 33 4.29 .62 -.06 .98 20 P TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM ”ESTER

X2’?P 4 5.43 4.1 9 .59 -.17 1 .05 20 P TENSILE STPENGTH, 1 4 ”0 40 LB/IN, FENDNLUM TESTEF L337 n 24.95 20.29 25.84 - 1.84 6.45 20 V TENSILE STRENGTH, 14 TO 40 LB/IN, PENDULUM TESTER

0MEAN9

4.39

9S*

3.91 ELLIPSE: .90 .37

1 .00 WITH GAMMA • 43 DEGPEES

29
KIL0NENT0N/M

TENSILE STR., PENDULUM, PRINTING P.

SAMPLE G40 = 4.89 K [ L0NEWT0N/M SAMPLE G33 = 3-91 KIL0NEWT0N/M

SAMPLE G40 = 16.49 LB/15 MM SAMPLE G33 = 13.19 LB/15 MM

KIL0NENT0N/M

i i i i i i i i i i i i i 13.5 14.5 15-5 16-5 17.5 18-5 19-5

LB/15 MM

30
REPORT NO. 658 TAPPI COLL ABORATI TB REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1 980 ANALYSIS 125-1 TABLE 1 TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION, JOULES PER SOUAPE VIEWER - PACKAGING PAPER TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T494 09-70, CONSTANT 2ATE OF ELONGATION APPARATUS

SAMPLE SHAFT ENVELOPE 9AMPLE KRAFT COATINGl BASE TEST D •

1 20 LAB G38 123 GIAMS PER SQUARE METER G49 96 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

fODE mean DEV N.DEV SDR P.. SDR MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

1.1 06 112.9 11.3 1.00 9.4 .78 139.1 18.2 1.58 16.3 1 .25 25F Q L 106

T

1 22 109.1 7.6 .67 8.1 .67 124.9 4.0 .34 13.3 1 .06 25P (3 L 1 22

T 151 101.5 .0 .CO 13.9 1.14 115.6 -5.3 -.46 18,9 1.45 25F <9 L 1 5

1 1*2 100.6 -.9 -. C8 11.7 .96 126.2 5.3 .46 11.

.89 25B fit L 1 82

L21 = 117.6 16. 1 1.42 10.6 .87 136.2 15.3 1 .33 8.0 .61 25J <9 L 21 9

T-234 69.4 -32. 1 -2.83 10.6 .87 113.3 -7. 1 -.62 9.4 .72 25F * L234

L23T3 105.1 3.6 .32 12.3 1.01 104.2 -16.7 1 .45 9.3 .72 25H 0 L237B

L26 4 127.4 5.9 .52 IS.1.25 102.3 -13.6 1.62 13.8 1 .06 25F a L 264

L2 67 176.6 5.1 .45 11.7 .96 134.3 1 3.3 1 .16 9.8 .75 25F fit L 267 L2'3 99.6 -1 .9 -.17 15.5 1.27 120.0 -.9 -.08 17.7 1 .36 25F fit L273

L2 _e 97.9 -3.6 -.31 ie.5 .66 133.5 12.5 1.09 8.8 .67 25E fit L278

T 2P0 104.1 2.6 .23 17.8 1.46 116.9 -4.0 -.35 17.6 1 .35 25B a L 280

T .3 1 2 99.1 -2.5 -.22 20. 1 1 .65 125. 0 4. 1 .36 15.2 1.17 25J a L 3 1 2

T 31 ? 100.4 -1 . 1 -. 10 8.3 .68 129.7 8.8 .77 11.5 .88 2SA a L 3 1 8 1580 102. 1 .6 .05 7.7 .63 115.0 — 5.9 -.52 7.8 .60 25C a I 580 L604 90.6 -10.9 -.96 15.2 1.25 105.7 -15.2 1.32 15.1 1.16 2SA a L6*4

95.5 -O." -.53 12.3 1.01 103.

-17.2 1.49 13.5 1.42 25F a L676

L6 89 86.7 -14.8 -1.31 9.5 .78 1 12.9 -8.0 -.69 14.3 1.10 2SP a L689

I* 35 94.4 -7.1 -.63 10.2 .63 118.7 -2.2 -.19 12.9 .99 2SF a L735 V^A 106.3 4.8 .42 8.7 .71 124.6 3.7 .32 8.0 .61 25E a L737\

TT3-7U 124.7 23.2 2* OS 14.9 1.23 136.7 15.8 1 .37 11.6 .39 25E a L737B

OR . MEAN • 101.5 JOULES/SQ M GRAND MEAN • 120.9 JOULES/SQ M TEST DETERMINATIONS • 2*

e D MEATS 11.3 JOULES/9Q M SD OF MEANS * 11.5 JOULES/SQ M 21 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDR - 12.2 JOULES/SQ M AVERAGE SDR * 13.0 JOULES/90 M G* . MEA” * 6.95 FT.LB/SQ FT GRAND MEAN - 8.28 FT.LB/SQ FT L250 c 8 .

-3.5 -.31 7.9 .64 127.7 -.2 -.02 6.9 .53 25N L250

Tfl-AL NUMBER OF LA BOPATOPIES REPORTING - 22

Best values : G38 102 ± 20 joules per square meter

G49 121 ± 20 Joules per square meter

31
^epo^t no. 6ss TAPPI COLLABORATI VE REFERENCE PROGRAM ANALYSIS 125-1 TABLE 2 TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION, JOULES PEE SQUARE METER - PACKAGING PAPER TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T494 0S-70, CONSTANT RATE OF ELONGATION APPARATUS

APRIL 1980

I AB COORDINATES AVG

•?*DE F G38 G49 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAS PROPERTY-- -TE3T INSTRUMENT- —CONDITIONS

T 234 * 69 .4 113.8 -27 .4 18. 1 .80 25 F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION < RITB TEST T19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

I 6 05 86.7 112.9 -16.1 5.1 .94 25F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T19 ), LINE/FLA’ JARS

Lt 04 0 90 .6 105.7 -18.5 -2.8 1 .20 25A TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION < RITH TEST T19 ), FLAT/FLAT JAWS

L* 3 5 e* 94.4 118.7 -6.5 3.6 .91 25F ’ENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TE«T T19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

I 6

** 6 0 95.5 103.8 -16.5 -7.6 1 .21 2SF TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST ’19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

L2~’8 * 97 .9 133. 5 6.6 11.3 .76 25 E TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION (RITH TEST T19 ), FLAT/FI AT JAWS

r 250 98.0 120.7 -2.6 2.4 .59 25N TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION (RITB TEST ’19 ). LINE/FLAT JAWS. 2-c

T 31 2 * 99.1 125.0 1 .3 4.6 1 .41 25J TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST T19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

1 3 0 99 .6 120.0 -2.0 .8 1 .32 25F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST ’19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

'318 0 IOC. 4 129.7 5.6 6.9 .78 25 A TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST ’19 ). FLAT/FLAT JARS

T

1 82 0 IOC.

6

126.2 3.2 4.3 .92 25B TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST T 1

9

), LINE/FLAT JAWS

1.15 1 10 1.5 115.6 -3.8 -3.7 1 .30 25F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST T19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

L58 0 r- 102. 1 115.0 -3.9 -4.5 .61 25C TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST ’19 ), LINE/LINE JAWS

12 8 0 * 104.1 116.9 -1.1 -4.6 1 .41 25B TENSILE ENERGY ABSORP’I ON (RITB IE ST T19 l.LINE/FLAT JARS

I 2 3“"B * 105. 1 104.2 -9.5 -14.2 .86 25H TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION (RITH TEST ’19 ), 2-PIN «TRAIN GACE

I* 3-

A

M 106.3 124.6 6.0 -.8 .66 25E TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST T19 ), FLAT/FLAT JARS

L267 106.6 134.3 13.1 5.6 .86 25F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T19 ). LINE/FLAT JARS 1264 107.4 102.3 -9 .3 -17.2 1 .16 25F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST T19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

1122 CM 109.1 124.9 8.1 -2.7 .86 2SP TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T19 ), PATTERNED FLA’ JAW

1.1 C 6 0 112.9 139.1 21.0 4 . S 1 .01 25F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST T19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

T 215 * 1 IT.

6

136.2 22.2 -1.0 .74 25J TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( RITH TEST T19 ), LINE/FLAT JARS

: * 373 0 124.’ 136.

27.5 -5.7 1 .06 2SE TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T19 ), FLA’/FLA’ JARS

ovr AVS

:

10 1 ,S 120.9 1 .00 '5» ELLIPSE: 38.1 21.9 WITH GAMMA - 45 DEGREES

32
T . E . R . . PACKAGING PAPERS

o

o

o

CD

I—

Ll- CU

in\ CD

CD • - —1 CD

I—

L_

O

O

o

CD

SAMPLE G38 =102. J0ULES/SQ M SAMPLE G38 = S-95 FT. L8/SQ FT

SAMPLE G49 = 121. JOULES/SQ M

SAMPLE G49 = 8.28 FT.LB/SQ FT

J0ULES/SQ M —7

1 1 1 1 1 i

1 1 1 1 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10-0

FT.LB/SQ FT

33
ppp-^i>T NO. 659 TAPPI COLLABORATIVE PEFEPENCE PROGRAM APRIL 19eO ANALYSIS 126-1 TABLE 1 TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION, JOULES PER SQUARE METER - PRINTING PAPER

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T494 OS-70, CONSTANT RATE OF ELONGATION APPARATUS

SAMPLE ENVELOPE SAMPLE COATED OFFSET BOOK TEST D. • 20 TAB H40 89 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER G33 75 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SOP VAR F LAB

T.l 1 5 41 -4.2 -1.00 6.0 .97 32.6 -5.7 -1.36 5.0 1 .08 26C o LI 15

T . 1 1 8 44.6 -1.4 -.34 5.8 .93 39.9 1.4 .34 3.3 .72 26E 0 LI 18

LI 22 43.6 -2.4 -.56 7.4 1. 19 40.0 1.6 .39 4.2 .92 26L 0 L 122

T 1 3<= 4 1.4 -4.6 -1.09 7. 1 1.14 33.0 -5.4 -1.27 4. 1 .90 26H 0 LI 39

LI 5 C 49.2 3.2 .76 3.9 .63 42.0 3.7 .87 2.0 .44 26F 0 L 1 59

t \t 3 44.8 -l . 1 -.27 6. 1 .98 39.8 1.4 .34 3.8 .83 26 J 0 L 16 3 LI 54.2 9.3 1.96 3.2 .52 43.6 5.3 1.25 1.3 .28 26D 0 L 1 67 LV T; 46.3 .3 .13 7.3 1. 17 32. 1 -6.2 -1.47 5.2 1.13 26C 0 L 1 85

i; i i 477830 . 4477784. 4**« *****106583.4 17506.23 314357.03 14318.77431 1 .33 100642.0 21 817 .8

1

26Z * L 2 1 1 i

- 52.0 6.0 1.42 8.2 1.32 35.6 -2.8 -.65 9.0 1 .94 26P 0 L 255

L3 ~ c 53.9 7.e l.SS 11.9 1. 92 42.2 3.9 .92 6.0 l .30 26 J fl I 309 L3 1 « 44 .

1

-1.9 -.45 5.2 .83 40.0 1.7 .40 3.7 .80 26A 0 L318

T

. 3 56 49.6 3.6 .86 7.0 1.14 39.9 1.6 .37 3.9 .95 26A o L 356

L

3“" 6 46.7 .7 . 17 8.1 1.30 47.1 8.8 2.08 5.3 1.15 26E 0 L376

* 3^3 42.0 -3.9 -.94 2.5 .40 35.5 -2.8 -.67 3.3 .71 26V 8 L39 3 L44 2 42. 1 -3.9 -.92 4.9 .78 40.3 2.0 .46 4.2 .90 26B 0 L442

’ 563 61.9 15.9 3.77 7.8 1.25 33.

e

-4.5 -1.07 10.6 2.30 26C « L563

Tf 6 ? 45.4 - .6 -.14 6.2 1.00 32.7 -5.6 -1.33 9.1 1 .97 26A 0 L 567 L5?5 40.5 -5.5 -1.30 4.4 .72 38.0 -.3 -.07 4.3 .92 26A 8 L575

T.5?2 45.5 -.4 -.10 6.5 1 .05 35.8 -2.5 -.60 5.3 1.14 26H 8 L 592

44 30.7 -15.2 -3.61 8.5 1.37 23.0 -15.4 -3.63 6.7 1 .45 26E * L7»4

C r . WEAN • 46.0 JOULES/SQ M GRAND MEAN • 38.3 JOULES/SQ M TEST DETERMINATIONS * 20

C D MEAN*; • 4.2 J80LES/SQ M SD OF MEANS • 4.2 JOULES/SQ M 18 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDP - 6.2 JOULES/SQ M AVERAGE SDR - 4.6 JOULES/SQ M

r-* . WEAN * 3 . 1 49 FT. LB/SO FT GRAND MEAN • 2.627 FT.LB/SQ P

I 25

C

43.4 -2.6 -.62 4.4 .70 37.9 -.4 -. 10 3.6 .79 26N L 250

r, r 3 o 6 1.3 15.3 3.63 5.8 .94 53.4 15.1 3.56 5.4 1.16 26 X L738

’•"-AL NUMBER "F LABORATORIES FEF 6 RTING - 23

Best values: GAO 46 ± 7 joules per 3quare meter

G33 33 ± 7 joules per square meter

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 563,

744.

Data from the following laboratories were not understood: 211.

34
REPORT NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1 960

ANALYSIS T26-1 TABLB 2 TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION, JOULES PER 3QUARB METER - PRINTING PAPER

TAPPI OFFICIAL TBST METHOD T494 OS-70, CONSTANT RATE OP ELONGATION APPARATUS

I AB MEANS C00PDINATE9 AVO CODE F <340 033 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PROPERTY TEST INSTRUMENT-—CONDITIONS

I.’ 4 4 * 30.7 23.0 -at .6 -.0 1 .41 26 E TENSILE ENBRGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ), PLAT/FLAT JAWS

L5^5 *1 40.5 38.0 -4.1 3.7 .82 26 A TEN9ILE ENERGY ABSORPTION (WITH TEST 20 ), FLAT/FLAT JAWS

t 13? <* 41.4 33.0 -7.1 -.5 1 .02 26H TENSILE energy ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST 20 ), 2-PIN STRAIN GAGE

LI IS A 41 32.6 -7.0 -1.0 1.02 26C TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION < WITH TEST T20 ), LINE/LINE JAWS

T 393 A 42.0 35.5 -4.8 .3 .55 26 V TENSILE ENEPGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ). LINE/FLAT JAWS

T 442 A 42.1 40.3 -1 .4 4.2 .84 26 B TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ). LINE/FLAT JAWS

L250 43.4 37.9 -2.1 1.5 .74 26N TEN9ILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST 20 ), LINE/FLA

JAWS,2I-C

L122 A 43.6 40.0 -.5 2.8 1 .05 26L TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ), PATTERNED FLAT JAW L318 A 44. 1 40.0 -.1 2.5 .82 26 A TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ), FLAT/FLAT JAWS 1113 A 44.6 39.8 .0 2.0 .83 26 E TENSILE ENEPGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST } , FLAT/FLAT JAWS

Lit 3 A 44.3 39.3 .2 1.8 .91 26 J TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 >, LINE/FLAT JAWS L567 A 45.4 32.7 -4.4 -3.5 1 .48 26A TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ), FLAT/FLAT JAWS

1592 A 45.5 35.3 -2.1 -1.5 1 .10 26H TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION < WITH TEST 20 ), 2-PIN STRAIN GAGE

T.l 6 5 A 46.3 32.1 -4.2 -4.6 1.15 26C TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST 20 ), LIVE/LTNE JAWS

L37 6 n 46.7 47.1 6.7 5.7 1 .23 26 E TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ). FLAT/FLAT JAWS

LI SS A 49.2 42.0 4.9 .3 .53 26F TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 )» LINE/FLAT JAWS 1356 a 49.6 39.9 3.7 -1.5 .99 26A ENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ), FLAT/FLAT JAWS

L2E5 A 52.0 35.6 2.3 -6.2 1 .63 26 P TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST 20 )» PATTERNED FLAT JAW

T 3 09 A 53.3 42.2 8.3 -2.8 1 .61 26J tensiLE ENEPGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ), LINE/FLAT JAWS 1167 a 54.2 43.6 9.6 -2.1 .40 26D ENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T23 ), 2-PIN STRAIN GAGE

L7 30 61.3 53.4 21. S -.2 1.05 26 X TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TBST T20 )! GIVE JAW TYPE

1563 61.9 33.8 8.0 -14.5 1 .78 26C TENSILE ENERGY ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST T20 ). LINE/LINE JAWS

C-MF AN’S ; 46.0 38.3

=5% ELLIPSE: 14.0 8.9

1 .00 WITH

26 Z TENSILE ENERGY

GAMMA • 45 DEGREES

ABSORPTION ( WITH TEST 20 ). LINE/LINE JAWS

35
T . E . A . » PRINTING PAPERS

CD

CO

^-1

CSJ ro

SAMPLE G40 = 46. J0ULES/SQ M SAMPLE G33 = 38-

SAMPLE G40 =3-15 FT.LB/SQ FT SAMPLE G33 = 2-63

J0ULES/SQ M FT.LB/SQ FT

O

CO

h- X CSJ _“ Li_ CD CD

CZ> CO

CSJ CO\

CO

o.

'3'

CO

_l

CD

CSJ

LU

_JX

38 J— h— CD

Ll_ X CDCO'

CSJ 34 1

CS1

CSJ

CSJ co"

o_

o

CSJ GO,

CSJ

CD- 26 1

CD CSJ

0-) + . X . « NOT [N GRAND MEANS

CO

CG ANALYSIS T26-1

LU

Cl_ CC

CQ

O 00,0D

O +

o

Q0

O

O

O

0

0 0

0

0

o

SAMPLE G40

30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50

J0ULES/SQ M

52 54 56 58 60 62

2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3-0 3.2 3.4

FT.LB/SQ FT

3.6 3-8 4 .0 4.2

36
PEpaR-r NO. 65 3 TAPPI C3LLAB0R ATI VE REFERENCE PROGRAM

ANALYSIS T28-1 TABLE t ELONGATION TO BREAK, PERCENT - PACKAGING PAPEH TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHODS T404 OS-76 AND T494 03-70, PENDULUM AND CPB TYPES

APRIL 1<380

SAMPLE KRAFT ENVELOPE SAMPLE KRAFT COATING> BASE TEST D.' 20 LAB G39 123 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER 049 96 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

CADE MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N • DEV SDR R.SDR VAP F LAB

LI C 6 1 .830 .309 1.82 .098 .71 2.270 .376 2.16 .172 1.19 28B 0 L1C6

1122 1.58? .06e .40 .071 .31 1.951 .05 8 .33 .134 .85 28P 0 L 1 22

1.151 1.640 .118 .70 .123 .88 1.800 -.094 -.54 .243 l .55 28B 0 L1S1

t. i e ?. 1.430 -.091 -.54 .080 .58 1.875 -.019 -.11 .116 .74 28B 0 L 182

L2 34 1 .095 - .426 -2.52 . 173 1.25 1 .780 -.114 -.65 .095 .61 28B » L 234

T 264 1 .76C .239 1.41 .164 1.18 1.890 -.004 -.02 .238 1.52 26B 0 L264

L26 5 1.427 -.094 -.56 .097 • 7C 1.739 -.154 -.38 .091 .58 28A 0 L 265

T.267 1 .460 - .C 6 1 -.36 .121 .87 1.914 .021 .12 .089 .57 2 8B 0 L 267

L2”’ 8 1.655 .134 .79 .100 .72 2. 175 .281 1.61 .091 .58 2 8A 0 L27P

L280 1 .71 1 .190 1.12 .122 .88 2.026 . 133 .76 .180 1.15 2 SB a L 280

L31 2 1 .635 .114 .67 . 166 1.20 2.120 .226 1.30 .379 2.42 28B a L 3 1 2 '31S 1.662 .141 .83 .077 .56 2.118 .224 1.29 .096 .61 2 8A 0 L318

L324 1.385 - .136 -.80 .123 .38 1 .760 -.134 -.77 .123 .79 2SP a L324

T 336 1.451 - .070 -.41 .130 .84 1.863 -.031 -.18 .129 .82 28A a L 336 1590 1.390 -.131 -.77 .102 -.74 1 .700 -.194 1.11 .103 .66 28C a 15 80

Lsei 1.38 1 -.140 -.82 . 160 1.15 1 .760 -.133 -.76 .097 .62 28A 0 L 58

L6'6 1.475 -.046 -.27 .636 4.59 1.530 -.364 2.09 .384 2.45 28B 0 L676

•.689 1.270 -.251 -1.48 .126 .91 1.795 -.099 -.57 .16 l 1.03 28B 0 T 689 I“3C 1.587 .066 .39 . 103 .73 1.894 .ooc .00 .127 .81 2 8 A 0 L730

L7 35 1.625 .104 .61 .129 .93 2.045 .151 .87 .147 .94 28B 0 L735

L73-A 1.518 - .00 3 -.02 .071 .51 1 .818 -.075 -.43 .070 .45 28A 0 L737A

I”3TE 1.487 -.034 -.20 .113 .81 1.832 -.96 1 -.35 .117 .75 28A a L‘T 37B

CR. MEAN • 1.521 PERCENT GRAND MEAN • 1.894 PERCENT TEST DETERMINATIONS * 20

«D MEAV 3 .16? PERCENT SB OF MEANS • . l-»4 PERCENT 22 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDR • .139 PERCENT AVERAGE SDR • .156 PERCENT

-OTAl VUNBEP OP LABORATORIES REPORTING * 22

Best values: G38 1.52 G49 1.88 0.29 percent 0.30 percent

37
APRIL 1980

1

REP«®T NO. 659 TAPPT COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM ANALYSIS T2S-1 TABLE 2 ELONGATION TO BREAK , PERCENT - PACKAGING PAPER

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METFODS T404 03-76 AND T494 0S-70, PENDULUM AND CRE TTPE3

COORDINATES AVG

r* DE F G33 049 MAJOR MINOS R. SDR VAR PROPERTY TEST INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS

T 234 * 1 .095 1.780 -.377 .229 .93 28B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ),LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS

16 99 a 1.2-’0 1 .79S — .245 .1 13 .97 28B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ), LOAD CELL , LTNE/FLAT JAWS

1.5 31 a 1.381 1 .760 -.193 .009 .89 28 A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 > . LOAD CELL, FLAT/PL AT JAWS

T.324 a 1 . 385 1 . 760 -.191 .006 .84 28P ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ),LOAD CELL, PATTERNED FLAT

1580 a 1 .390 1.700 -.231 - .039 .70 28C ELONGATI ON ( WITH TEST T 19 ) .LOAD CELL, LINE/LTNB JAWS

I 265 a 1 .427 1 .739 -.176 -.039 .64 28A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T 19 J.LflAD CELL, PLAT/FLAT JAWS

I 1 32 a 1.430 1 . 87 S -.076 .053 .66 28B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ),LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS

L3 3 6 a 1.451 1 . 863 -,0T 0 .029 .88 28A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ) , LOAD CELL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

I 2 67 a 1 .460 1.914 -.027 .059 .72 28 B ELONGATION < WITH TEST T19 ) . LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS

T .t T 6 a l.4''5 1.530 -.294 -.218 3 • 52 2 SB ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ) , LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS

17 3^Q a 1 .487 1.332 -.068 -.0 18 .78 28A ELONGATION < WITH TEST T 19 ) , LOAD CELL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS ^37 A a 1.518 1.818 -.056 -.050 .48 28A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ), LOAD CELL. FLAT/FLAT JAWS

T

. r' 3 0 a 1 .587 1.894 .046 -.048 .78 28 A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T 19 ) . LOAD CELL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

LI 2 2 a 1.589 1.951 .089 -.009 .68 23P ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T 19 ),LOAD CELL. PATTERNED FLAT

V*3 5 a 1.625 2.045 .181 .030 .94 28B ELONGATI eN < WITH TEST T19 l.LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS

1712 a 1 .635 2.129 .242 .074 1 .81 28B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T 19 ),LOAD CELL.LINB/PLAT JAWS

Li 51 1.640 1 . 300 .015 -.151 1 .22 28B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ). LOAD CELL. LINE/FLAT JAWS

L2~ 8 a 1.655 2. 175 .296 .098 • 65 28A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ) . LOAD CELL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

L3 1 8 a 1 .662 2.118 .259 .054 .59 28A ELONGATION ( WTTH TEST T 1 9 ), LOAD CELL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

L230 a 1.711 2.026 .227 -.045 1 .01 26B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T19 ), LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS L264 a 1.760 l .89C .163 -.175 1 .35 28B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T 19 ) . LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS

Li 06 a i .e30 2.270 .485 .037 .90 28B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T 1 9 ), LOAD CELL , LTNE/FLAT JAWS

9MFAVS

:

1.521 1.894 1 .00 95* ELLIPSE: .602 .267 WITH GAMMA • 46 DEGREES

sa
PERCENT

EL0NGAT I QN T0 BREAK, PACKAGING PAPER

SAMPLE G38 = 1 .52 PERCENT SAMPLE G49 = 1 .89 PERCENT

PERCENT

39
rcp*iqT NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS T29-1 TABLE t ELONGATION TO BREAK, PERCENT - PRINTING PAPER

TAPRI OFFICIAL TEST METHODS T404 fls-76 AND T494 03-70, PENDULUM AND CRE TYPES

SAMPI

E

ENVELOPE SAMPLE COATED OFFSET1 BOOK TEST D. • 20

T-AB G40 88 GRAMS PER SQUARE METBP G33 75 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

CPDE MEAN DEV N.DEV SOP R. SD R MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R. SDR VAR F LAB

L1C5 .or' -1 .390 -8.38 .014 .10 .110 -t .399 -9.69 .013 .09 29A • L 105 1118 1.345 -.142 -.86 .135 .99 1.420 -.089 -.61 .079 .57 29A 0 me

1122 1.471 -.017 -. 10 . 144 1.0S 1 .608 .099 .68 . 106 .77 29P 0 L 122

1 1 3 C 1.185 -.303 -1.83 . 163 1.19 1 .230 -.279 -1.93 . 108 .78 29D fl L 1 39

1 1 A l T 1 .298 -.190 -1. 14 .182 1.33 1.355 -. 154 -1.07 .138 1.00 29D o L 141T 1163 1.478 -.009 -.06 .129 .94 1.542 .033 .23 .101 .73 29B 0 L 163 n^e 1.422 -.065 -.39 .217 1.58 1.523 .014 .10 .213 1 .54 29B 0 L 176 L1P5 1 .405 -.083 -.50 .147 1.07 1 .305 -.204 -1.41 .136 .98 29C 0 L 185

T 255 1 .80 6 ,319 1.92 .172 1.26 1 .679 . 170 1.18 .251 1 .82 29P 0 L255

13' 1.788 .301 1.81 .244 1.78 1.731 .222 1.53 . 161 1.17 29A 0 L309

L3 18 1.553 .065 .39 . 094 .6<» 1.71

1

.202 1.40 .103 .75 29 A 0 L 3 1

8

T 344 1 .665 • l^T 1.07 .055 .40 1.532 .023 .16 .104 .75 29A 0 L344

1356 1.547 .06 0 .36 .141 1.03 1 .545 .036 .25 .098 .71 29A 0 L356

T 386 1 .290 -. i9e -1.19 .129 .94 1.335 -. 174 -1.21 .131 .95 29A o L386

1442 1 .520 .032 .19 .070 .51 1 .655 . 146 1.01 .115 .83 29B fl L442

15 67 1.459 -.029 -. 17 .125 .91 1.389 -.120 -.83 .219 1.59 29A o L567

15 ^ 5 1.352 -.136 -.82 .088 .64 1.491 -.018 -.12 .152 1.10 29A o L575

15^2 1.52 9 .C 42 .25 . 122 .89 1 .417 -.092 -.64 .139 1.91 29D 0 LS92

16 1.695 .207 1.25 . 136 .99 1.610 .101 .70 .162 1.17 29C 0 L6°e

t

1 .460 -. 02 e -.17 .110 .80 1.595 .086 .59 .110 .80 29A 0 l-»36

Ct'. MEAN • 1.488 PERCENT GRAND MEAN - 1.509 PERCENT TEST DETERMINATIONS - 29 SD * .166 PERCENT SD OF MEANS * .144 PERCENT 19 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDR • .137 PERCENT AVERAGE SDR • .138 PBPCENT

1153 1 .685 .197 1.19 .118 .86 1.745 .236 1 .63 .139 1 .01 29R - L 153

12 4 2 1 .685 .197 1 . 19 .160 1.17 1 .905 .396 2.74 .20 1 1 .46 29 R 1 242

I 46 4 1.641 .153 .92 .153 1.11 1. 516 .007 .05 . 143 1.03 29R L484

1626 1 .335 -.152 -.92 . 138 1.01 1 .352 -. 1S7 -1.09 .092 .67 29R L626

16 85 1 .930 .442 2.66 .181 1.32 2.100 .591 4.09 .117 .85 29H L685

L^5<? 1 . 16C -.328 -1.98 . 196 1.43 1.225 -.284 -1.97 .283 2.04 29X L759

T0~AL NUMBER OF LABORATORIES REPORTING • 26

Best values: G40 1.48 ± 0.29 percent

G33 1.52 ± 0.25 percent

Data from Che following laboratories appear to be

off by a multiplicative factor: 105.

40
REPORT NO. 60S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE RBFBPENCB PROGRAM APRIL 1900

ANALYSIS 129*1 TABLE 2 ELONGATION TO BREAK, PERCENT - PRINTING PAPER

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHODS T404 OS-76 AND T494 OS-70, PENDULUM AND CRB TYPES

I AB MEANS COORDINATES AVG

("ODE F G40 033 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PROPERTY TEST INSTRUMENT- --CONDITION

L1C3 « .097 .110 -1.965 -.175 .19 29A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ),L0AD CELL. PLAT/FLAT JAW8

X ”50 1.160 1.225 -.434 -.007 1 .74 29X EL0NGA7ICN ( WITH TEST T20): GIVE INSTRUMENT A JAW TTPES

LI 35 1.185 1 .239 -.412 -.019 .99 29 D ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ) .LOAD CELL, 2-PIN STRAIN GAGE

L3S6 1.290 1.335 -.264 -.006 .95 29A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T2O.L0AD CELL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

t 14 IT 1.298 1.355 -.245 .004 1,16 29D ELONGATION ( WITH TE9T T29 ) .LOAD CELL, 2-PIN STRAIN GAGE

'626 1.335 1.352 -.218 -.022 .84 29 R ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ), PENDULUM, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

I UP 1.345 1.420 -. 166 .024 .78 29 A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ),L0AD CELL, FLAT/PLAT JAWS

LS^S * 1.352 1.491 -.116 .074 .87 29A EL0NGA7I0N ( PITH TEST T20 ), LOAD CELL, FLAT/PLAT JAWS

T 165 f4 1.405 1.305 -.195 -.103 1.03 29C ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20),L0AD CELL, LINE/LINE JAWS

1176 A 1.422 1.523 -.041 .053 1 .56 29B ELONGATION ( WITH TEST 720), LOAD CELL. LINE/FLAT JAWS

1.567 M 1.459 1.389 -.100 -.074 1.25 29 A elongation ( WITH TEST T20 ) , LOAD CELL, FLAT/PLAT JAWS

L’36 M 1.460 1.595 .034 .084 .80 29A ELONGATI ON ( PITH TE ST T20J.L0AD CELL, FLA7/FLAT JAWS M22 A 1.471 1.608 .050 .087 .91 29 P EL0NGA7T8N < PITH TEST T20 ) , LOAD CELL, PATTERNED FLAT JAWS

LI 6 3

(* 1.478 1.542 .014 .032 .84 29B EL0N0A7I8N (PITH TEST T20 ),LOAD CELL , LINE/FLAT JAWP

L442 1.520 1.655 .118 .091 .67 29 B ELONGATION ( PITH TEST T20 ) , LOAD CELL, LINE/FLAT JAWS

L592 1 .529 1.417 -.027 -.097 .95 29D elongation ( PITH TEST T2O.L0A0 CELL, 2-PIN STRAIN GAGE

1356 1 .547 1. 545 .069 -.011 .87 29A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T 20), LOAD CELL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

1314 1.553 1.711 .179 .113 .72 29A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ) , LOAD CBLL, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

L4e4 1.641 1.516 .122 -.093 1 .07 29R BLONGATI ON ( PITH TEST 720 ), PENDULUM, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

L3 44 1.665 1.532 .151 -.096 .58 29 A ELONGATI «N ( PITH TEST T20 ) , LOAD CBLL. FLAT/FLAT JAWS

L242 1.685 1 .905 .405 .176 1.31 29R ELONGATION ( PITH TEST T20 ) , PENDULUM , FLAT/PLAT JAWS

L153 1 .695 1.743 .302 .054 .94 29R ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ),FENDULUM, FLAT/FT AT JAWS

1.64 3 e 1.695 1.610 .223 -.056 1 .08 29C ELONGATION ( PITH TEST T20 ) .LOAD CELL, LINE/LINE JAWS

13 09 <« 1 .788 1 .731 .373 -.023 1 .47 29A ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ), LOAD CELL, PLAT/PLAT JAWS

1.255 A 1.806 1.679 .353 -.074 1 .54 29 P ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ) , LOAD CELL.PAT7ERNED FLAT JAWS i6es 1 .930 2.100 .718 .168 1.C3 29 R ELONGATION ( WITH TEST T20 ), PENDULUM, FLAT/FLAT JAWS

G MEANS : 1.499 1.509 1.00 95S ELLIPSE! .575 .195 WITH GAMMA • 40 DEGREES

41
PERCENT

EL0NGAT 1 0N TO BREAK , PRINTING PAPER

SAMPLE G40 = 1.49 PERCENT SAMPLE G33 = 1.51 PERCENT

o

CvJ

CD

CD

O

CD

LD

CD + , X . * NOT IN GRAND MEANS

m& ANALYSIS T29-1

LU

Q_

CE

CO

o

cP

0

o

0

0

0

o

0

_±_

0

CD

CM

o

+ 0

0

0 o

0

O + 0

O

SAMPLE G40

0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2-0 2.1

PERCENT

42
KEP*°T NO. 653 TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PSflOHAM ANALYSIS 130-1 TABLE 1 FOLDING ENDURANCE (MIT), DOUBLE POLOS

TAPPI SUGGESTED VIE TROD T5U 3U-69

APRIL 1980

SAMPLE REPSOCOPY SAMPLE OFPSBT PRINTING TEST D.- 15

T AB B69 70 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER 028 94 GRAMS PER SQUARE METBR

CODE MEAN DEV M .DEV SDP R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DBV SDR R.SDR VAP F LAB

T K S 25.7 -174.9 -2.40 10.2 .17 8.6 -18.2 •3.03 2.1 .27 30M # L 10 5 ilia 194.= -5.7 -.08 26.6 .45 24.0 -2.8 -.47 4.5 .57 30D 0 L 1 1 8 LI 21 2*4.9 4.3 .06 67.5 1.15 25.8 3.0 .49 8.7 1.12 30M 0 L 121

LI 22 244.9 44.3 .61 76.8 1.31 32.8 6.C .99 12.8 1 .64 30M 0 L 1 22

T 1 24 241 .3 40.7 .56 41.4 .•M 25.2 -1.6 -.27 3.4 1.07 30N 0 L 124

L 1 50 267.7 67.1 .92 40.6 .69 27.8 1.0 .16 8.2 1 .05 30M 0 L 150

LI 5? 58.2 -142.4 -1.95 29.0 .49 12.5 -14.4 -2.39 2.8 .36 30N 0 L 153

7 1 59 460.7 260.1 3.57 55.9 .95 53.3 26.5 4.40 10.3 1.38 39N X L1S9

T 162 132.7 -67.9 -.93 49.5 .84 24.6 -2.2 -.37 7.4 .95 30M 0 L 162 M £3 125.7 -74.9 -1.C3 37.6 .64 21.6 -5.2 -.87 6.1 .78 30 N (5 L 1 63

L 1 " 6 212.6 12.0 . 16 92.3 1.58 31.6 4.8 .79 12.6 1 .62 3 ON 0 I 176

1 1 a2« 2 30.0 79.4 1 . 09 55.3 .94 36.1 9.3 1.54 9.0 1.15 30M 0 L182M

T

1 '5 307.9 107.3 1.47 1 04.5 1.78 28.8 2.0 .33 5.6 .72 30N 0 Lies

1212 170.1 -30.5 -.42 51.7 .88 26.2 -.6 -.11 6.6 .85 30M 0 I 212

T 223F 240.2 39.6 .54 49.7 .85 35.1 9.2 1.37 12.5 1 .6 1 30M 0 T 223F

T 230 163.9 -31.7 -.44 55.0 .94 32.3 5.5 .91 6.6 .34 30N 0 L 230 L232 166.2 -34. 4 -.47 25.0 .43 47.0 20.2 3.35 5.8 .74 30N X L232

’ 23SA 164. 7 -35.9 -.49 103.1 1 .76 22.4 -4. 4 -.74 3.3 1 .06 30N 0 L238A

I 2 3SB 207.9 7.3 .10 92.3 1.57 26.9 .0 . 00 9.2 1.19 30 D 0 L238B

T.2f 4 235.7 35.1 .48 64.0 1.09 24.7 -2. 1 -.35 9.2 1.18 3CM 0 L 254

T 262 132.7 -17.9 -.24 22.2 .38 25.

-1.0 -.16 9.4 1 .21 30N 0 L262

L2‘ 4 200.9 .3 .00 87.5 1.49 33. 1 6.2 1.03 14.5 1 .87 30N 0 L2*4

L2? 5 115.6 -35.0 -1.17 47.5 .81 22.6 -4.2 -.71 4.0 .52 30N 0 L275

L2'8 32.2 -118.4 - 1.62 55.3 .94 21.9 -4.5 -.82 8.7 1.12 3CC 0 L2T 8 L2*t 195.5 -5.1 -.07 27.0 .46 25.9 -.9 -.15 5.1 .65 30N 0 I.2-»o

T 2 P 5A 344.8 144.2 1.98 75.7 1.29 35.7 8.8 1.47 9.4 1 .20 30N 0 L285A

L2P5B 330.7 130.1 1 .79 91 .8 1.57 37.5 1 0.6 1.77 11.4 1.47 30N 0 L28S3

* 320 212.1 11 .5 . 16 77.9 1.33 28.0 1.2 .19 13.0 1 .6** 30N 0 L32C

7.32 1 328.3 127.7 1.75 93.7 1.60 33.7 6.3 1.13 9.3 1 .20 30M 0 L321 L326N 100.0 -1 00.

-1.38 30.9 .53 16.6 -10.2 -1.70 4.7 .60 30 N 0 L326N

L33 c 105.

-95. 1 - 1 • 30 29.2 .50 15.1 -11.7 -1.95 3.5 .45 30M 0 I 339

T

. 366A 123.3 -77.3 -1.C6 53.2 .91 18.-8.2 -1.36 4.2 .54 30N 0 L366A

L3’6 133.3 -67.3 -.92 73.4 1 . 25 2C. 1 -6.7 -1.12 8.8 1.14 30N 0 l 376

l 3F3 254.4 53. e .74 65.7 1.12 30.

3.7 .61 6.9 .89 3«N 0 1388

T 3=0 157.3 -42.8 -.59 46.8 .80 21.3 -5.6 -.93 4.6 .59 30N 0 L390

T 3=3 1’8.C -22.6 -.31 17.3 .30 27.0 1.0 .16 4.4 .56 3 0M 0 L393

L396M 287.5 86.9 1 . 19 103.6 1.77 38.6 11.

1.95 10.7 1.38 30N 0 L396M

L565 174. 1 -26.5 -.36 29.6 .5 1 24.7 -2.2 -.36 5.1 .66 39N 0 I 565

T 567 338. 1 137.5 1 .39 149.7 2.55 26.0 -.8 -.14 9.7 1 .24 30N • L56-* ’5»S 109.5 -91.1 -1.25 13.5 .23 23.2 -3.6 -.61 4.3 .6 1 30N 0 LS89

I5 = => 170.5 -3C. 1 -.41 ICO.

1.72 26.4 -. 4 -.07 e.4 1 .08 30C 0 L59=

L6 70 175.1 -2S.5 -.35 30.4 .52 26.7 -. 1 -.02 7.0 .90 30N 0 L6t 0 LT"5 147.9 -52.7 -.72 29.4 .50 35.3 9.0 1.49 5.0 .65 30N » L*05

L734 231.9 31 .3 .43 70.5 1.20 32.9 6. 1 1.01 7.5 .96 30C 0 LT34

L73-' 234.2 33.6 .46 64.8 1.11 25.3 -1.6 -.26 7.3 .94 3CN 0 L 737

GP. WEAN - 2CO .6 DOUBLE FOLDS GRAND MEAN * 26.8 DOUBLE FOLDS TEST DETERM TNATIONS • 15 3D MEANS • 72.9 DOUBLE FOLDS SD OF MEANS * 6.0 DOUBLE FOLDS 41 LABS IN grand MEANS AVERAGE SDR • 58.6 DOUBLE FOLDS AVERAGE SDR * 7.8 DOUBLE FOLDS

11625 135.4 -65 .2 -.89 48.9 .83 28.3 1.4 .24 10.6 1 .36 30S L182S

L3 269 37.5 - 163. 1 -2.24 11.2 . 19 15.6 -11.2 -1.37 5.4 .69 30 9 L 3269

L706 117.2 -e3.4 -1.14 47.9 .82 22.5 -4. 4 -.73 9.3 1.19 301 L706

L7 43 138.7 -61.9 -.85 52.2 .89 18.9 -7.5 -1.31 4.6 .59 30X L743 TOTAL NUMBER OF :LABORATORIES REPORTING • 49

Best values: B69 200 double folds G28 27 double folds Tha ISO ( Intarnat ional Standards Organization ) is proposing that HIT folding tndurtnca be

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 105. reported as tha logarithm (to ttia baa* 10) of

the double fold instead of tbe double fold

as in tbe past.

Data from the following laboratories were not understood: 705. Flaosa ace page 46 of this report for demonstration of this proposal.
OEW’T NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS T30-1 TABLE 2 POLDING ENDURANCE (MIT), DOUBLE FOLDS

TAPPI SUGGESTED METHOD T511 SU-69

T AB MEANS COORDINATES AVO CODE F E69 G28 MAJOR MINOR P. SDR VAH PROPERTY- --TEST INSTRUMENT-—CONDITIONS

f 1 OS * 25.7 8.6 -175 .7 -6.9 .22 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L326S 3*3 • 5 15.6 -163.4 -.7 .44 303 FOLDING ENDURANCE, SCHOPPER, LEIPZIG

LI 58 a 58 .2 12.5 - 1 43 .

0

-5.1 .43 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN L2^8 82.2 21.9 -118.5 2.8 1.03 30C FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, CIRCULATING FAN IN CEILING

L3 26N a 1 00.0 16.6 -101 .0 -3.7 .56 3 ON FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L3 39 a 1 05.5 15.1 -95.6 -5.5 .48 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T. 58*? A 109.5 23.2 -81.2 2.3 .42 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T.2"5 <*» 115.6 22.6 -85.1 1.3 .67 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T * 06 113.2 22.5 -83.5 1.0 1 .00 30 X FOLDING ENDURANCE: GIVE INSTRUMENT MAKE AND MODEL

I 36 6A 123.3 18.7 -77.7 -3.2 .73 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

LI 63 125.7 21.6 -75 .

1

-.4 .71 3CN FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L 1 62 f\ 132.7 24.6 -67.8 2.2 .90 30M FOLDING ENDUPANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

» 3* 6 133.3 20.

1

-67.6 -2.3 1 .19 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

LI a 28 135.4 28.3 -65 .

0

5.6 1.10 303 FOLDING ENDUPANCE, SCHflNPER, LEIPZIG

LT 4 3 138.3 18.9 -62.2 -3.9 .74 30 X FOLDING ENDUPANCE: GIVE INSTRUMENT MAKE AND MODEL

T ~C5 1 A’ .0 35. 8 -52.

C

12.3 .58 3CN FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L3 C 0 a 153.8 21.3 -43.1 -2.8 .69 30 N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN L238A « 164.3 22.4 -36.

1

-2.1 1 .41 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

12 32 X 166.2 47.0 -33.0 22.3 .59 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN L230 a 168.9 32.3 -31.3 7.5 .89 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L2 1 2 a 130.1 26. 2 -30.

5

1.3 . 86 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L5< 8 a 170.5 26.4 -30.0 1.5 1 .40 30C FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, CIRCULATING FAN IN CEILING

T 565 * 174. 1 24.7 -26.6 -.5 .58 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T 6T0 a 175.1 26.3 -25.4 1.5 .71 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

I 393 -4 138.0 27.8 -22.5 2.4 .43 30W FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L262 182.7 25.8 -17.8 .2 .79 30 N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

LI 1 ? a 184.9 24. 0 -5.8 -2.5 .51 30D FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, MODIFIED DRIVE TO REDUCE HEATING

L2 T 9 a 185.5 25.8 -5.2 -.6 .56 3 ON FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T 2-T 4 200 .9 33. 1 .7 6.2 1 .68 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN 1121 204.9 29.8 4.5 2.7 1.14 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

! 238B 2Q3 .9 26.9 7.3 -.4 1 .38 30 D FOLDING ENDUPANCE, MIT, MODIFIED DRIVE TO REDUCE HEATING 1320 a 212.1 28. 0 1 1 .6 .4 l .50 30N POLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

LI "6 212.6 31 .6 12.3 4.0 1 .60 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

231 .9 32.9 31 .6 4.1 1 . 08 30C FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, CIRCULATING FAN IN CEILING

L7 3T a 234.2 25.3 33 .4 -3.7 1.02 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1254 a 235.7 24.7 34.8 -4.4 1. 14 30 W FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L2 23F a 240.2 35. 1 40.

1

5.6 1 .23 30M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1124 a 241 .3 25.2 40.5 -4.3 .89 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

11 22 a 244.9 32.8 44.6 3.1 1 .48 30M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

136 8 a 254.4 30.5 53.9 .2 1 .00 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1 150 a 263.7 27.8 67.0 -3.4 .87 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

11 82M a 260.0 36. 1 79.8 4.1 1 .05 30M FOLDING ENDURANCB. MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN I396M a 283.5 38.6 97.5 6.1 1 .57 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN 1165 * 303.8 28.6 107.2 -5.0 1 .25 30K FOLDING ENDURANCB, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1321 a 228.3 33.7 127.9 -1.5 1 .40 30M FOLDING ENDURANCB. MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L2 6 5B a 33 C.

3

37.5 130.6 2.2 1.52 30N FOLOING ENDURANCE. MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN 1567 « 338 .

1

26. 0 137.1 -9.7 1 .80 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, NO CENTFIFUGAL FAN

1 285A a 344. e 35.7 1 44.5 -.S 1 .25 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTFIFUGAL FAN 1159 X 46 0.7 53.3 261.2 9.6 1 .17 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

r,MFA^3

:

200.6 26.8 1 .00 95 * :ELLIPSE

:

198.3 9.6 WITH GAMMA - 3 DEGREES

44
DOUBLE

FOLDS

100

ISO

200

250

300

350

400

450

FOLDING ENDURANCE (NIT)

SAMPLE 869 = 201- DOUBLE FOLDS SAMPLE G28 = 27. OOUBLE FOLDS

DOUBLE FOLDS

45
PEP«R7 NO. 6SS TAPPI COLLABORATIVB REFERENCE PROGRAM ANALYSIS 130-2 TABLE 1 FOLDING ENDURANCE (NIT) DATA IS LOG( BASE 1 0 ) OF TBE DOUBLE FOLD MEASUREMENT

APRIL I960

T A B SAMPLE

069 REPB0COPY

70 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

SAMPLE

G28 OFFSET PRINTING

94 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

TEST D* 1• 15 CODE MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SD® MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R. SDR VAR F LAB

LI r 5 1 .39 -.87 -4.48 .14 .98 .92 -.48 -4.22 .10 .78 30M * L105

LI 1 8 2.29 .03 . 16 .06 .44 1 .37 -.03 -.29 .08 .63 30D 3 L 1 1 8

L 1 2 1 2.28 .03 . 15 .17 1.22 1.46 .05 .44 .13 1.01 30M 3 L 1 2

1

LI 22 2.3T .12 .60 .13 .92 1 .48 .08 .67 .18 1 .39 30M a L 122

I 1 24 2.38 .12 .64 .07 .48 1 .38 -.03 -.24 .13 1.14 30N * L 1 24 1150 2.42 .17 .87 .07 .46 1 .43 .02 .19 .12 .94 30M g L15*

I 1 5P i.-n -.54 -2. ’9 .22 1.55 1 .09 -.32 -2.80 .09 .73 30N » L 158

LI 5? 2.66 .4 1 2. 10 .05 .37 1.72 .3 1 2.74 .09 .67 30N « L 159

t It 2 2.09 -.16 -.84 .18 1.25 1 .37 -•C3 -.29 .13 1.00 30M 3 L 162

Lie 3 2.C 8 -.1 e -.91 .15 1.03 1 .32 -.09 -.78 .13 1 .00 30N 3 L 163

LI '6 2.28 .02 . 12 .23 1.61 1 .46 .05 .47 .21 1 .59 3 ON 3 LI 76

T 1 82M 2.44 . i e .95 .09 .64 1 .54 .14 1.21 .12 .89 30M 0 L182M

Life 5 2.47 .22 1.11 .13 .88 1 .45 .05 .40 .09 .68 30N 3 L 1 85

T 212 2.21 -.04 -.22 .14 .95 1 .41 .00 .01 .10 .78 30M a L212

T 223F 2.37 .12 .61 .09 .62 1 .52 .1 1 .99 .15 1.19 30M 3 L223N

r 2 3“ 2 ,2f -.05 -.26 .15 1.07 1 .50 .10 .S3 .09 .'o 3 ON 3 L230

t. 22 2 2.22 -.04 -.20 .07 .47 l .67 .26 2.30 .05 .41 30N X L232

T 2 38A 2.12 -.14 -.71 .34 2.34 1 .32 -.09 -.78 .19 1 .44 3CN 3 L23eA

T 2 3 8 B 2.27 . 02 .09 .22 1.52 1 .40 -.00 -.02 .16 1 .22 30D 3 L238B

t 254 2.36 .10 .S3 .12 .87 1 .37 -.04 -.36 .16 1 .26 30M 3 L254

L26 2 2.26 • TO .02 .05 . 38 1.39 -.02 -.13 .14 1 .05 30N 3 L262

L2~ 4 2.27 .01 .08 .17 1.21 1 .4-r .07 .60 .21 1 .66 30 N 3 ir4

T 2~5 2.03 -.22 -1.15 .17 1.19 l .35 -.06 -.51 .08 .60 30N 3 L 275 L2~8 1 .83 -.42 -2. 17 .26 1.85 1 .32 -.09 -.78 .14 l .1 1 30<" • L27e

r 2 -g 2.29 .03 . 17 «C6 .44 1.41 -.00 -.00 .09 .70 30N 3 L279

r ze 5A 2.53 .27 1.42 .59 .65 1 .54 .13 1.16 .11 .87 3 ON 3 L285A

T 2

C 5B 2.50 .25 1.29 .13 .88 1.55 .15 1.29 .14 1 .07 30N 3 L285B

L32 ' 2.30 .04 .23 .16 1.15 l .41 .00 .03 .18 1 .42 3 ON 3 L320

t 32 1 2.50 .25 1.27 .13 .88 1.51 . 1 1 .94 .11 .84 30M 3 L321 L326N 1 .98 -.27 -1.42 .14 1.01 1 .21 -.20 -1.75 . 1

1

.99 30N 3 I 326N

L 33? 2.01 -.25 -1.27 .12 .82 1.17 -.24 -2.07 .10 .78 30M 3 L33°

I 3 66A 2.05 -.21 -1.06 .21 1.43 l .26 -.15 -1.27 .10 .77 30N 3 L366A

t 3^6 2.03 -.23 -1.18 .37 2.59 l .26 -.15 -1.29 .21 1 .65 30N 3 L376

T 388 2.39 . 1 4 ."'l .12 .83 1.47 .07 .59 .10 .79 30N 3 L3es

L3 C 0 2.18 -.08 -.40 .15 1 . 04 l .32 -.09 -.77 .10 .75 30 N 3 L39<“

• 3 C ? 2.25 -.<* 1 -.03 .04 .29 1 .44 .03 .29 .07 .53 30M 3 L393

13? 6M 2.43 .18 .91 .16 1.13 1 .57 .16 l .43 .13 .99 30 N 3 L396M

T 565 2.23 -.02 -.10 .08 .57 1 .38 - .02 -.20 .09 .72 30N 3 L56S

L3 6^ 2.48 .22 1. 14 .25 1.74 l .38 -.02 -.18 .17 l .32 3^N 3 L567

T 5 0? 2.04 -.22 -1.12 .06 .38 1 .36 -.05 -.43 .09 .71 30N 3 L58C

L5?? 2.17 -.09 -.44 .24 1.66 1 .40 -.01 -.07 .16 1 .21 30C 3 L599

ie^r 2.24 -•C 2 -.09 .08 .57 1.41 .01 .06 .12 .92 30 N 3 L67C

T L 5 2. 16 -.09 -.48 .09 .62 1 .55 .14 1.26 .06 .46 30N « L705

L734 2.34 . C 9 .47 .14 1.01 1 .51 .10 .87 .11 .85 30C 3 L734

1737 2.35 .10 .52 .12 .82 1 .38 -.02 -.19 .13 1 .03 30N 3 L737

G*>. HE AN

?D MEAN?

* 2.25

* .19

LflG( 10 ) FOLD

L0G( 1 0 ) FOLD AVERAGE SDR • .14

GRAND MEAN • SD OF MEANS • LOO( 1 0 ) FOLD

1.41

.1 1 L0C( 10 ) FOLD

L0G( 10 ) FOLD AVERAGE SDR

TEST DETERMINATIONS • 15 42 LABS IN GRAND MEANS

• .13 L0G( 10 ) F«LD

L 1 82S 2.11 -.15 -.75 . 14 1.01 1 .42 .02 .15 .16 1 .24 30S L182S

L326« 1.56 -.70 -3.60 .13 .89 1.17 -.24 -2.08 .16 1 .2 1 30S L326S

L^Ot 2.03 -.22 -1.14 .19 1.31 1 .32 -.09 -.79 .19 1 .44 301 L-'Oe

L7 43 2.1 1 -.15 -.75 .18 1.28 1 .26 -.14 -1.24 .11 .37 301 L743

T0 TAT NUMBER OF LA3OPAT0RIE® REPORTING * 49 Ihe ISO (International Standards Organization) is pro*

posing that MIT folding endurance ba reported as tbe logarithm (to the base 10) of the doutle fold instead

of the double fold as in the past.

Analysis T30-1 in this report is the same as in the

past slth no changes. Tbe analysis, T30-2, shoes the data as the ISO proposes. This analysis uses tbs roe data reported for T3Q-1. Tbs rae data are converted

to tbe logarithm (base 10) as ahosn in ti. . . nuple to the right, and then the seen of the c <>r-eii irta is calculated and reported as IS* foldi„. .uJunucu.

46

Ran data

(Folding number

in doubts folds)

207

166

1S1 232

260

137

199 230

210 nean of rae data

log ( base 10 1 of rae data

2.32

2.22

2 .ie 2.52

2.41 2.14 2.30

2,36

2.31 mean of logs

’Folding endurance"
REPORT NO. 658 TAPP! COLLABOR ATI VB REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980

ANALYSIS T30-2 TABLE 2 FOLDING ENDURANCE (MIT) DATA IS L0G( CASE 10) OF THE DOUBLE FOLD MEASUREMENT

' AB MEANS COORDINATES AVG

Cm DE F B6 9 G28 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PROPERTY-- -TEST INSTRUMENT—-CONDITIONS

L 1 0 5 a 1 .39 .92 -.95 -.0 1 .88 30M folding ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

I 326S 1 .56 1 .17 -.*3 .12 1 .05 30 3 FOLDING ENDURANCE, SCHOPFER, LEIPZIG

I 1 58 * 1 .*1 1 .09 -.63 -.02 1.14 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

I 2*8 * 1 .83 1 .32 -.41 .12 1 .48 30C FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, CIRCULATING FAN IN CEILING

T. 3 2 6N * 1 .98 1 .21 -.34 -.05 .95 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

r 339 * 2.01 1.17 -.33 -.09 .80 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L3“ 6 * 2.03 1.26 -.27 -.02 2.12 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T 2*5 A 2.03 1.35 -.22 .06 .69 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T *C6 * 2.03 1.32 -.24 .03 1 .39 30X FOLDING ENDURANCE: GIVE INSTRUMENT MAKE AND MODEL

T 585 2.04 1.36 -.22 .06 .54 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T 3t6A <1 2.05 1 .26 -.25 -.03 1 . 10 3CN FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1163 * 2.09 1 .32 -.20 .01 1.01 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT# NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

Ilf ? <* 2.09 1 .3* -.16 .05 1 .13 30M FOLDING ENDUP ANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1. 1 82® 2.1 1 1.42 -.12 .08 1.13 303 FOLDING ENDURANCE, SCHOPPER, LEIPZIG

T." 43 2.11 1.26 -.20 -.06 1.08 30X FOLDING ENDURANCE: GIVE INSTRUMENT MAKE AND MODEL L239A PK 2.12 1 .32 - . 16 -.01 1.89 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L* 05 # 2.16 1.55 -.01 . 17 .54 3 ON FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1555 K 2.17 1.40 -.oe .03 1 .43 30C FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, CIRCULATING FAN IN CEILING

L3 C 0 A 2.18 1.32 -.11 -.04 .89 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

12 3 0 A 2.20 1.50 .00 . 1 1 .89 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN L212 ft 2.21 t .41 -.04 .02 .87 30 M FOI DING ENDUPANCE. MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L232 X 2.22 1.67 .05 .25 .44 30 N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T 565 <* 2.23 1.38 -.03 -.01 .64 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, NIT , NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T.6 *0 * 2.24 1.41 -.01 .01 .74 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN 1303 2.25 1.44 .01 .03 .41 30M FOI DING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN 1262 <o 2.26 1 .35 -.00 -.02 .72 30 N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T 2' 4 2.27 1.47 .05 .05 1 .44 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T 23eB 2.2* 1 .40 .01 -.01 l .37 30 D FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. MODIFIED DRIVE TO REDUCE HEATING

LI 06 * 2.28 1 .46 .05 .04 1 .60 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

' 121 2.28 1 . 46 .05 .03 1.11 30M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

r. i i s 2.29 1.37 .01 -.04 .54 30D FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. MODIFIED DRIVE TO REDUCE HEATING

L2 * 5 2.29 1.41 .03 -.02 .57 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T. 32 0 2.30 1.41 .04 -.02 1 .28 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L* 3 4 2.34 1.51 .13 .04 .93 30C FOI DING ENDURANCE, MIT, CIRCULATING FAN IN CEILING

T 73* 2.35 1.38 .08 -.07 .93 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

T.2 54 2.36 1 .37 .07 -.08 1 .07 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

1 122 2.37 1 .4e .14 .01 1.15 30M FOLDING ENDUPANCE, MI*. WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN L223F 2.37 1.52 .16 .04 .90 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

LI 2 4 1? 2.38 1 .38 . 1 0 -.08 .81 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN '386 * 2.35 1.47 .15 -.01 .81 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

LI 5 0 2.42 1 .43 .16 -.06 .70 30 M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L3 5 6* 2.43 l .57 .23 .06 1 .06 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

! 1 92M a 2.44 1.54 .23 .03 .77 30M FOLDING endurance. MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN Lies (0* 2.47 1 .45 .21 -.06 .78 30 N FOLDING ENDURANCE. MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

I 567 2.49 1.38 .18 -.12 1 .53 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT. NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

£.321 f* 2 .50 1.51 .27 -.02 .86 30M FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, WITH CENTRIFUGAL FAN

L2F5H 2.50 1.55 .29 .01 .98 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

126 5A <? 2.53 1 .54 .30 -.01 .76 30N FOLDING ENDUPANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN

LI 59 * 2.66 1.72 .51 .08 .52 30N FOLDING ENDURANCE, MIT, NO CENTRIFUGAL FAN GMEAN^

2.25 l .41 1 .00 55% ELLIPSE: .56 .14 WITH GAMMA • 28 DEGREES

47
G10J

(Ot

)00!

FOLDING ENDURANCE ( MIT )

SAMPLE BS9 = 2-25 L0GC10) F0LD SAMPLE G28 = 1-41 L0GC1O) FOLD

48
»EPS?T Nfl. 65S TAPPI COLLABflRATIVB PEFEPENCE PPOGRAM APRIL 1981* ANALYSIS T35-1 TABLE l GURLEY STIFFNESS RESULTS EXPRESSED IN STANDARD SUBLET UNITS: MILLIGRAMS F«R A 1X3 INCH SPECIMEN (ACTUAL LENGTH 3.S INCHES)

LAB SAMPLED69 HEPROCOPY

70 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

SAMPLE

H72 PRINTING92 GRAMS PER SQUARE HBTBR

test D.’• 10

-ODE MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR S. SDR MEAN DEV N.DBV SDR B.3DB vab F LAB

LI 1 ® 90.1 3.0 .38 2.9 .59 176.9 6.7 .52 8.0 .82 35G © Liie

T. 1 21 78.0 .8 .10 10.1 2.05 162.0 -8.2 -.64 5.9 .61 35G © L121

T 122 66.2 -11.0 -1.39 6.3 1.29 162. 1 -8.1 -.63 8.5 .87 35G © L 122

T 1 32 96.5 9.3 1 . 18 6.3 1.27 195.5 25.3 1.95 16.1 1 .66 35G <9 L132

L13<= 91.8 4.6 .59 5.0 1.02 90.0 -80.2 -6.20 4.3 .44 35G * L 1 39

r 1 AS 81.6 3.e .48 4.8 .98 156.1 -14. 1 -1.09 6.0 .62 35G (9 L 1 48

LI 5 3 77..7 .39 3.4 .70 184.9 14. y 1.13 6.7 .69 35G © L 1 53

I 1 59 69.5 -7.6 -.97 2.9 .59 157.3 -12.8 -.99 7.9 .81 350 <5 L 1 59

Lit 2 56.6 -18.5 -2.35 7.S 1.53 150.2 -20.0 - 1 .54 11.4 1.18 35G © I 162

Lie 3 ’4.0 -3.2 -.40 11.3 2. 29 167.5 -2.7 -.21 11.1 1.15 35G © L163

’1 = 3 80.1 2.9 .37 8.8 1.79 191.2 21.0 1.62 11.0 1.14 35G © L 1 83 L212 90.4 3.2 .41 6.1 1.25 188.2 13.0 1.39 40.2 4.15 35G © L 2 1 2 L223 78.1 1 .0 . 12 3.0 .62 161 .4 -3.8 -.68 5.5 .57 3SG L223

’224 296 .C 218.8 27.74 38.6 7.87 552. 0 331.8 29.49 25.3 2.61 35G « L 224

T 232 66.1 -11.0 -1.40 3.9 .79 173.3 3. t .24 14.7 1 .52 350 © L232

L2 A

42.1 -35. 1 -4.45 1.7 .34 93.3 -76.9 -5.94 5.6 .57 35G L 24 1

1 254 91.5 4.3 .55 2.1 .43 169.3 -.9 -.07 7.6 .79 35G © L254

T 26t 31.0 3.8 .49 2.3 .4’ 165.2 -5.0 -.39 10.1 1.05 35G © L26C

L2£ 5 95. 9 3.7 1.11 3.7 .76 165.3 -4.9 -.38 11.7 1.21 35G © L 285

L291 79.2 2.0 .26 2.5 .51 163.4 -6.8 -.53 8.3 .85 35G © L 29 1

7 3 21 79.2 2.0 .26 2.8 .57 151.0 -19.2 -1.48 .1 .01 350 © L321

’356 ’S.o -1.2 -. 16 2.0 .41 156.3 -13.9 -1.08 3.5 .36 35G © L 356 L3’6 92.8 5.6 .71 6.3 1.28 173.2 2.9 .23 7.8 .81 35G © L376

T 3 = 2 78.3 1 .2 . 15 5.0 1 .0 1 176.0 5.8 .45 6.3 .65 35G © L382

’390 91.7 4.5 .57 12.3 2.50 173.3 3. 1 .24 15.2 1.57 35G © L 390

L562 30.6 2.9 .36 .0 .00 170.0 -.2 -.02 .0 .00 35G © L562

’567 53. C -24.2 -3.66 8.2 1.68 164.6 -6.2 -.48 7.0 .72 35G * L567

L5" 1 80.9 3.7 .47 3.8 .77 192.8 22.6 1.74 e.7 .90 35G © L57

L 650 91.2 4.0 .51 4.1 . 83 180.0 9.8 .76 12.5 1.29 350 © L6S0

L6 = 3 97. 1 9.9 1.26 3.7 .76 185.8 15.6 1.20 6.2 .64 350 © L69 3

’ 7 29 •’6.4 -.7 -.69 4.6 .94 153.7 -16.5 -1.28 10.4 1 .08 3SG © L’29

L* 32 1.5 -75.6 -9.59 . 1 .91 3.2 -167.0 - 12.90 .1 .0 1 35G « L732

np . MEAN

90 WEANS

• ’7. 2

* 7.5 GURLEY UNITS GURLEY UNITS AVERAGE SDP • 4.9

GRAND MBAN

9D OF MEANS

GURLEY UNIT

* 1’0.2

• 12.9

3

GURLEY UNITS

GURLBY UNITS AVERAOB SDR • 9.7

TEST DETERMINATIONS - 10 28 LABS IN GRAND MEANS

GURLEY UNITS

L21 3 81.0 3.8 .48 5.8 1.19 174.3 4.1 .32 s.a .60 35H L213

''•(’’’•AL NUMBER BP LABORATORIES BBPORTINO • 33

Beat valuaa: B69 79 ± 13 Gurley units

H72 169 t 22 Gurley units

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 139.

Data from the following laboratories appear to be off by a multiplicative factor: 224, 241, 732.

49
r E p<=.i>T «J0. 65 S TAPPI COLLABORATI VB REFERENCB PROGRAM APRIL 1 98" ANALYSIS T35-1 T A BLE 2 GURLEY STIFFNESS

PE SDLTS EXFRESSED IN STANDARD GURLEY UNITS: MILLIGRAMS FOR A 1X3 INCH SPECIMEN (ACTUAL LENGTH 3.5 INCHES)

J AB MEANS COORDINATES AVG CODE F B69 H7 2 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PROPERTY- --TE3T INSTRUMENT-—CONDITIONS

f 32 « 1 .5 3.2 -182.9 12.9 .01 35 G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE)

! 24 1 * 42.1 93.3 -84.3 6.1 .46 35 G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

1567 • 53.0 164.0 -14.2 20.5 1 .20 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) 1162 58.6 15C.2 -2S.2 10.4 1 .35 3SG STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) 1232 9 66.

1

173.3 -.9 11.4 1 . 16 3SG STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/IX3 -actually 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

1122 9 66 .2 162. 1 -11.4 7.5 1 .08 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

1 1 59 + fc« .5 157.5 -14.6 2.7 .70 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

I 1 63 •'4.0 167.5 -3.7 2.0 1 .72 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) 13 56 * 75.

S

156.3 -13.5 -3.7 .38 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE) TTJC <* 76.4 153.7 -15.7 -5.1 1 .01 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- test PIECE

)

1.1 53 <?» 77 .9 184.9 14.0 4.4 .70 35G STIFFNESS, GURLBY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE)

1 1 21 78.0 162.

C

-7.4 -3.6 1 .33 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) 1223 f* 78.1 161.4 -7.9 -4.0 .59 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE > 1342 9 *'8.3 176.0 5 .9 .9 .83 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

T 2?1 78.2 163. 4 -5.7 -4.3 .68 350 STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE )

1321 a 78.2 151.0 -17.3 -a.

6

.29 35 G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -AC-UALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) 1562 80.0 l’O.O .8 -2.7 .00 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

I 1 “3 eo. 1 191.2 20.7 4.6 1 .47 3SG STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE)

1118 9 eo. i 176.9 7.3 -.5 .71 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE )

T 212 ** 80.4 188. 2 18.0 3.2 2 .70 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

T 571 m 80.9 192.8 22.5 4.4 .83 35 G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) 1213 81.0 174.3 5.2 -2.2 .89 3SH STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 TEST PIECE). 29 C. 65% «H 1148 81 .0 156. 1 -11 .8 -8.5 .80 35 G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

r 26<- 9 8 1 .0 165.2 -3.4 -5.4 .76 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

T 6 5* 9 51.2 18".

0

1C .6 -.3 1 .06 350 STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

12 54 e* a i .5 169.3 .6 -4.4 .61 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) L380 a 81.7 173.3 4.5 -3.2 2 .04 3SG STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

I 1 39 * 8 1.8 9C .0 -73.6 -32.2 .73 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) 1 376 82.8 173.2 4.7 -4.3 1 .04 35G STIFFNESS, GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE ) I 285 fl 85.9 165.3 -1 .6 -9.9 .98 35 G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE )

1 132 fl 86.5 195.5 26.9 .C 1 .47 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/ 1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

16 9 3 87.1 1 85. 8 18 .

1

-3.9 .70 35G STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE

)

1224 « 296.0 552.0 434.0 -72.4 5 .24 350 STIFFNESS. GURLEY (UNITS: MG/1X3 -ACTUALLY 3.5- TEST PIECE )

9 MEANS

:

7~. 2 170.2 1 .00 95% El I 7P3E

:

35.9 17.8 WITH GAMMA • 69 DEGREES

50
GURLEY

UNITS

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

200

STIFFNESS, GURLEY

30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 10 120 130

GURLEY UNITS

51
REPORT NO. 65 S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1 9e<? ANALYST S T36-1 TABLE 1 TABER STIFFNESS

TAPPT OFFICIAL TEST METHOD TA89 OS-76. RESULTS EXPRESSED IN SRAM CENTIMETERS

' AB SAMPLE

G29 OFFSET PRINTING

94 GRAMS PER SQUARE METEP

SAMPLE

B56 BRORN 1 76 GRAMS PER :IRAFT SQUARE MBTER TEST D# 1 10 COPE MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

LI C7A 86 .60 79.73 98.99 3.44 8.75 65.20 60.73 82.24 6.17 16.98 36T • H07A

T 123 7.93 1.06 1.32 .39 .99 S.34 .87 1.18 .30 .82 36D 0 L 1 22

LI 23 7 .40 .53 .66 .52 1.31 5.10 .63 .86 .57 1 .56 36T 0 L 123

: 1 26 5.63 -1.24 -1.53 .28 .70 3.73 -.74 -1.00 .22 .62 36T 0 L 126

7 150 5.92 -.95 -l . 18 .23 .72 3.84 -.63 -.85 .22 .61 36T 0 LI 50 1158 6.31 -.56 -.69 .17 .42 3.33 -1.14 -1.54 .14 .39 36T 0 L 158

Lie 3 6.52 -.35 -.43 .23 .60 4.34 -.12 -. 16 .16 .44 36T 0 L 163 L1-3B 7.35 .4e .66 .41 1.C5 4.80 .33 .45 .26 .71 36T 0 L173B

1.182 9 .92 1 . 14 .46 1.18 4.90 .43 .59 .35 .96 36T <3 L 182

1.207 3.19 1.32 1.64 .52 1.33 6.20 1 .73 2.35 .77 2.12 36T 0 L207

12 1 2 7.18 .31 .39 .33 .97 4.42 -.05 -.06 .21 .58 36T 0 L212

T 2 1 9 7.40 .53 .66 .52 1.31 4.80 .33 .45 .42 1.16 36T 0 L219

I 223 6.1 4 -.73 -.90 .27 .69 3.75 -.71 -.96 .19 .52 36T 0 L228

T 242 1 .6 1 -5.25 -6.52 .12 .31 1.07 -3.39 -4.59 .09 .24 36T * L242

L2t 2 9.00 1 .13 1.40 .47 1 .20 6.00 1.53 2.08 .47 1 .30 36- 0 L262

T 2' 4 7.00 . 13 . 16 .33 .85 4.10 -.37 -.50 .46 1 .26 36T 0 L274

L2S1 6.21 -.66 -.82 .30 .76 4.08 -.38 -.52 .38 1 .04 36T 0 L281

L2 C '' 6.33 -.74 - .C 5 .61 1.55 4.44 -.03 -.03 .39 1.07 36T 0 L290

1315 7. 1C .23 .29 .88 2.23 4.60 .13 .18 .97 2.66 36T 0 L315

L31° 6.77 -.09 -.12 .28 .70 4.42 -.04 -.06 .17 .46 36T 0 L319

L221 -.5C .63 .78 .59 1.50 5.65 1.18 1.60 1.08 2.98 36T 0 L321

T 324 5.9C -.96 -1.20 .38 . 98 3.89 -.57 -.77 .33 .91 36T 0 L 324 L339 5.72 -1.15 -1.43 .21 .55 3.38 -1.09 -1.47 .25 .68 36T 0 L339

T 38 6 13. 90 7.73 8.73 1.81 4.60 10.70 6.23 8.44 .95 2.61 36T « L3ee

L442 7.36 .99 1.23 .38 .96 5.C2 .55 .75 .21 .59 36T 0 L442

14 P 4 4 .99 -1.88 -2.33 .23 .72 3.40 -1.07 -1.44 .29 .79 36T 0 L484

157* i : . 2? 3.33 4. 14 .92 2.34 6 .60 2.13 2.89 .84 2.32 36T • L57«

1580 7.20 .33 .41 .42 1.07 5.00 .53 .72 .47 1 .30 36T 0 L58C

16 0 4 6.44 -.42 -.53 .32 .81 4.26 -.21 -.28 .36 .99 36 T 0 L6C4

1616 '.15 .28 • 35 .24 .6 1 4.05 -.42 -.56 .16 .44 36T 0 L616

t 651 7.7C .33 1.03 .48 1.23 5.50 1 .03 1.40 .53 1 .45 36T 0 L651

T 692 7.05 . i e .23 .44 1.11 4.40 -.07 -.09 .29 .31 36- 0 L692

17 03 7.45 .58 .'2 .37 .94 4.05 -.42 -.56 .16 .44 36T 0 L703

T -29 7.20 .33 .41 .48 1.23 4.40 -.07 -.09 .46 1.26 36T 0 L-29

L'37 5.93 -.93 -1.16 .28 .72 3.69 -.78 -1.05 .13 .35 36T 0 L — 37 7*56 6.01 -.86 -1.07 .39 1.0C 4. CO -.47 -.63 .27 .73 36T 0 L756

OR. MEAN • 6.87 TABER ONITS GRAND MEAN • 4.47 TABER UNITS TEST DETERMINATIONS • 1« FD MEANS * .31 TABE® DNITS AVERAGE SDR • .39

3D OF MEANS

TABER UNITS

• .74 TABER UNITS AVERAGE SDR - .36 32 LABS IN TABER UNITSGRAND MEANS

1260 7.30 .43 .54 .42 1.07 3.72 -•75 -1.01 .09 .26 36U L250

7. -’5 2 5.94 -.93 -1.15 .33 . 83 3.87 -.60 -.81 .33 .91 36L L 753 TOTAL NUMBER OF LABORATORIES REPORTING - 33

Best values: G29 7.0 ± 1.4 Taber units

B56 4.4 ± 1.3 Taber units

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 570.

Data from the following laboratories appear to be

off by a multiplicative factor: 107A, 242, 388.

52
RFPORT NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1 980

ANALYSIS 736— 1 TABLE 2 TABER STIFFNES9

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T489 OS-76, RESULTS EXPRESSED IN GRAM CENTIMETERS

’ A3 COORDINATES AVG

r,fl DE F G29 B56 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PROPERTY— -TEST ’242 * 1 .61 1.07 -6 . 17 1.01 .28 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

L484 a 4.99 3.40 -2. 1 1 .47 .76 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

LI 26 a 5.63 3.73 -1.41 .28 .66 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

L335 a 5.72 3.38 -1.58 -.03 .62 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

T.3 24 5.90 3.85 -1.10 .22 .94 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

I 1 50 a 5.92 3.34 -1.12 .17 .66 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

V»3T a 5.93 3.65 -1.21 .05 .54 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

’"53 5.94 3.87 -1.09 .18 .87 36 L STIFFNESS, lorent:

’ "56 a 6.01 4.00 -.55 .23 .87 36T STIFFNESS, "•ABER

’ 22

a 6.14 3.76 -1.01 -.03 .61 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

T 2P 1 & 6.21 4.08 -.75 .16 .90 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

Lise a 6.31 3.33 -i.ie -.47 .41 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

L6 0 4 6.44 4.26 -.45 .13 .90 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

’163 -a 6.52 4.34 -.34 .14 .52 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

L31 9

a 6."T 4.42 -. 1 0 .03 .58 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER 1200 i* 6 .83 4.44 -.rs .01 1.31 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

’ 2* 4

« 7.00 4. 1 0 -.15 -.36 1 .06 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

16 <=2 a '.05 4.40 .09 -.17 .56 36T STIFFNE9S, TABER

1315 a 7.10 4.60 .26 -.06 2 .44 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

’616 a 7.15 4. 05 -.07 -.50 .52 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

’212 a " . 13 4.42 . 20 -.24 .78 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

1" 29 4 7.20 4.40 .20 -.27 1 .25 36 T STIFFNESS, T ABER

15 5 0 0 7.20 5.00 .60 .17 1.19 36T STIFFNESS, "•ABER 12 5 0 7.30 3.72 -.18 -.84 .67 36 U STIFFNESS, TABER,

I1"3B * t .35 4.8C .58 -.07 .88 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

1219 a 7.40 4.80 .62 -.11 1 .24 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

1123 a 7.40 5.10 .82 .11 1.44 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

I "03 a 7.45 4.05 .15 -.70 .69 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

12 21 a 7.50 5.65 1.26 .45 2.24 36 T S TIFFNESS, TABER

7 65 1 7.70 5.50 1 .31 .21 1 .34 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

1152 a 7.76 4 ,5C .57 -.30 1.07 36T STIFFNESS, TAEER

T 442 a 7.36 5.02 1.11 -.25 .78 36T STIFFNESS, TABEP

11 22 a 7.93 5.34 1.37 -.06 .91 36 D STIFFNESS, "ABER,

126 2 a 8.00 6.00 1.87 .38 1 .25 36 T STIFFNESS, TABEP

12 0" a 3.15 6.20 2.14 .40 1 .72 36 T STIFFNESS, TABEP

15 "0 * 10.20 6.60 3.9f -.65 2.33 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

1383 * 13.50 10.70 9.40 -.09 3.60 36 T STIFFNESS, TABER

T 1 0" A 86.60 65.20 99.87 -8.44 12.86 36T STIFFNESS, TABER

6.87 4 .47 1 .00

5 5 A ELLIPSE: 2.76 .75 WITH GAMMA • 42 DEGREES

53
TABER

UNITS

STIFFNESS, TABER

SAMPLE G29 = 6.9 TABER UNITS SAMPLE B56 = 4.5 TABER UNITS

54
WEROR7 NO. 65 s TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS T49-1 TABLE l 9 EFFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT - VISCOSITY VELOCITY PRODUCT ( VVP ) IN KILOPOISE CENTEMETER3/SEC0ND

TAPPI SUGGESTED METHODS T514 3U-69 AND T499 9U-64 FAMPLE HEAI SET OFFSET BOOK SAMPLE CHEMICAL WOOD BOND TEST D.* 4 LAB B88 88 GRAMS PER :SQUARE METER 044 73 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

c«<r>E MEAN DEV N .DEV SDP R. SDR MEAN DEV N .DBV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

1122 20.2 -11.3 -.86 1.1 .36 87. 1 -32.0 -.46 1.6 .32 49Q 0 L 1 22

LI 49 27.2 -4.3 -.33 1.4 .47 142.0 22.9 .33 .0 .00 49N 0 L 1 49

7.1 e 2

’ 27.8 -3.7 -.28 .9 . 28 112.6 -6.5 -.09 4.9 .98 49Q 0 L 1 821

12* 7 34.2 2 .e .21 6.9 2.31 39.0 -80.1 1.16 2.2 .43 491 0 L207

L242 62.5 31.0 2.36 14.4 4.84 NO DATA REPORTED FOR SAMPLE G44 49Q M L 242

L2"4 36.9 5.4 .41 6.6 2.20 72.8 -46.3 -.67 .0 .00 491 0 I 274

t 28** 21.9 -9.6 -.73 1.4 .46 104.

-15. 1 -.22 26.6 5.28 49Q 0 L280

7.2=1 37.1 5.6 .43 3.1 1.03 NO DATA REPORTED FOE SAMPLE G44 491 M L291

L313 25.

-5.7 -.44 2.3 .77 169.

49.9 .72 .0 .00 49Q 0 L313

L3 88 64.7 33.3 2.53 6.1 2.06 191.2 72.2 1.05 10.5 2.09 49Q o L388

1564 27.2 . -9.2 -. 32 .5 . 17 NO DATA REPORTED FOR SAMPLE G44 49D M L 564

15 9 8 20.7 -it. e -.82 1.2 .40 27.1 -92.

1.34 4,6 .50 49W 0 L598

7,6 4 3 35.5 4.0 .30 2.0 .69 246. 1 127.0 1.84 .0 .00 491 0 I 643

7,6 65 43.5 12.0 .91 3.3 1.11 137.0 17.9 .26 .C .00 49Q 0 L685

7. "46 34.3 2 .e .22 7.6 2.56 111.7 -7.3 -.11 .1 .01 49F 0 L746

GT. MEAN * 31 .KP CM/SEC GRAND MEAN • 119.1 KP1 CM/SEC TEST DETERMINATIONS • 4 SD MEANS 13.2 KP CM/SEC SD OF MEANS * 68.9 KP1 CM/SEC 10 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDR • 3.0 KP CM/ SEC AVERAGE: SDR - 5.0 KP CM/SEC -OTAL NUMBER OF LABORATORIES REPORTING * 15

Data from Che following laboratories were omlcted

from the grand means because no viscosity values were reported: 746. The data from these labs were converted to the common unit, cm/sec.

Data from the following laboratories were omitted

from the grand means because the values obcained

were outside the range of the laboratory's normal

testing procedure: 685.

PEFO°T NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1580 ANALYSIS T49-1 TABLE 2 U=FACE PICK ST PENGTE, IGT - VISCOSITY VELOCITY PRODUCT (VVP) IN KILOPOISE CENTEMETEP9/PEC0ND

TAPPI SUGGESTED MET HOD9 T514 SU-69 AND T499 SU-64

MEANS COORDINATES AVO

CODE F B88 G44 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PROPERTY--- TEST INSTRUMENT ---CONDITIONS

T, 1 22 <3 20.2 87.1 -32.8 8.5 .34 49Q SUPFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, IGT OIL

T 5? 8 20.7 27.1 -52.6 2.9 .65 49 W SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, OIL

7.280 21.9 104.0 -IS .S 8.2 2.87 49Q SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, IGT OIL

L313 3 25.7 165.0 49.2 10.0 .38 49 Q SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, IGT OIL

L 1 4 C a 27.2 142.0 22.4 6.3 .24 49N SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, PIB FLUID

I 564 M 27.2 .17 49D SURF ACE PICK STRENGTH. IGT, INK

LI £2" e 27.8 112.6 -6.8 3.1 .63 49Q SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, IGT OIL 1207 34.2 39.0 -79.6 -9.6 l .37 491 SUPFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, PIB FLUID

L- 46 * 34.3 111.7 -7.1 -3.5 1 .29 49 F SURFACE PICK STRENGTH. IGT, INK 1643 * 35.5 246.1 126.9 7.0 .34 491 SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, PIB FLUID

t.2*4 f* 36.9 72. 8 -45.7 -9.3 1 . 10 491 PURF ACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, PIB FLUID

1291 M 37.1 1.03 491 SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, PIB FLUID

L665 ft 43.5 137.0 18.5 - 10.4 .56 49Q SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT. IGT OIL 1242 U 62 .5 4.84 49 Q SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, IGT, IGT OIL

1388 M 64.7 191.2 74.8 -26.9 2.07 490 SURFACE PI CK STRENGTH, IGT, IGT OIL 31.5 119.1 1 .00 55* ELLIPSE: 218.9 37.3 WITH GAMMA • as ;DEGREES

55
KP

CM/SEC

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, I GT

SAMPLE 888 = 31

.

I I KP CM/SEC SAMPLE G44 = 119. KP CM/SEC

i i i i i_

C

0

LlJ

I a_

21

CL

CO

0

0

+.X.« NOT rN GRAND MEANS

ANALYSIS T49-1

0

0

C

o

LO

0

0

O

0

SAMPLE B88

50 100 150 200 250 300

KP CM/SEC

350 400 450 500

56
SRPOOT N8. 633 TAPPI C0LLAB8RATI VE REFERENCE PReORAM APRIL 198C ANALYSIS T30-1 T ABLB l SURFACE PICK STRENGTH. WAX NUMBER

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T459 03-75, SURFACE STRENGTH OF PAPER (WAX PIC* TBST

)

SAMPLE HEAT SET OFFSET BOOK SAMPLE CHEMICAL WOOD BOND TBST D. 5 LAB BBS 88 GRAMS PER :SQUARE METER G44 73 GRAMS PER SQUARE METER

oflOE MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N . DEV SDR R.SDR VAR F LAB

LI T 5 7.80 .52 1.01 .84 1.71 18.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 SOW fl L1CS

7.1 1 S 6.60 -.66 -1.32 .39 1.82 18.60 1.18 1.03 .55 2.83 SOW 3 L 1 1

T 122 7.40 .12 .23 .55 1.12 18.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 sow fl L 122

LI 59 ’.20 -.08 -. 16 .45 .91 16.00 -1.42 1.24 .00 .00 sow 0 LI 58

L 1 6 2 7. AO .12 .23 .55 1.12 1 8.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 sow 3 I 162

LI" 3A 7.20 -.08 -.16 .45 .91 1 1 .00 -6.4 2 5.61 .00 .00 sow * H73A

LI 82W ’.OC -. 28 -.55 .00 .00 18.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 50W a L 182W

LI 33 8. CC .72 1.39 1.00 2.04 18.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 5CW a L 1 83 L213 7.00 - .28 -.55 .00 .00 18.00 .53 .50 .00 .00 50W a L213

L22 5 8.20 .92 1.78 .84 1.71 18.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 50W a L 225

L2 29 6.20 -1.03 -2. 10 .45 .91 14.80 -2.62 2.29 1.10 5.67 50W a L22B

L 237 "’.20 -.08 -. 16 .45 .91 1 8.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 50W a L230

T 2* 4 "’.20 -.03 -. 16 .45 . 9 1 1 8.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 sow a L274

T 2f 5 7.4C .12 .23 .55 1.12 16.00 -1.42 1.24 .00 .00 50W a L285

1339 3.6C 1.32 - 2.56 .55 1.12 NO DATA REPORTED FOR SAMPLE G44 50W M L 339

I 36 6 ’.20 -.08 -. 16 .45 .91 15.20 -2.22 1.94 1.10 5.67 50W a L 366 1567 9.0G .72 1.39 .00 .00 18.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 SOW a L56’

L6 1 6 6.80 -.4e -.94 .45 .91 17.60 .18 .15 .55 2.83 50W a L616

I 69’ 7.20 -.oe -.16 .45 .91 18.00 .58 .50 .00 .00 50 W a L 69’

LT 4o 7.00 -. 2 e -.55 .00 .00 20.00 2.58 2.25 .00 .00 50* « L’46

r-VMEAN * 7.26 WAX NUMBER GRAND MEAN - 17.42 WAX NUMBER TEST DETERMINATIONS * 5

ST> MFANS * .52 WAX NUMBER SD OF MEANS - 1.14 WAX NUMBER 17 LABS IN GRAND MEANS

AVERAGE SDR - .49 WAX NUMBEF AVERAGE SDR • .19 WAX: NUMBER

-OTAI VCMBEP OF LABORATORIES REPORTING • 20

Best values: B88 7.2 t 0.9 wax number

G44 17.7 ± 2.0 wax number

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand means because of extreme test results: 173A.

Data from the following laboratories were omitted

from the grand means because the values obtained

were outside the range of the laboratory's normal

testing procedure: 746.

REPORT NO. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATI MB REFERENCE PROGRAM ANALYSIS T50- 1 TABLE 2 SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX NUMBER

TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T459 OS-75, SURFACE STRENGTH OF PAPER (WAX PICX TBST)

APRIL I960

LAB MEANS COORDINATES AVG

7PDE F BP3 G44 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR L229 6.20 14.80 -2.78 .56 3.29 SOW

LI 15 9 6.60 13.60 1 . 02 .90 2 .33 50 W L616 6.80 17.60 .08 .51 1 .87 SOW

17*6 * 7.00 20.00 2.47 .77 .00 SOW

L21 3 9 7.00 13.00 .51 .39 .00 SOW L182W 9 7.00 18.00 .51 .39 .00 50 W

LI 56 9 "’.20 16.00 -1.41 -.19 .46 50W

l 1" 3A * 7.20 11.00 -6.32 -1.16 .46 SOW

L69’ 9 7.20 18.00 .55 .19 .46 50W

T.366 * 7.20 15.20 -2.20 -.35 3.29 50 W

L2* 4 9 7.20 13.00 .55 .19 .46 50W

I 230 9 "’.20 18.00 .55 .19 .46 SOW

LI 6 2 9 7.40 18.00 .59 -.00 .56 sow

LI 22 f 7.40 18.00 .59 -.00 .56 sow L26S 7.40 16.00 -1.37 -.39 .56 sow

LI 05 9 7 .80 18. CO .67 -.40 .85 sow

LI 83 9 8.00 18.00 .70 -.59 1 .02 50W

LS67 9 3.00 18.00 .70 -.59 .00 sow L225 9 3.20 13.00 .74 -.79 .85 sow

L339 M 8 .60 1.12 sow ouFANS

7.28 17.42 1 .00 95* ELLIPSE: 3.26 l .33 WITH GAM

PROPERTY—-TEST INSTRUMENT CONDITIONS

SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 as7s

)

SURFACE PICX STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T4S9 GS7S ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T4S9 as75 ) SURFACE PICX STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 as75 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH. WAX ( TAPPI T4S9 a 375 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 aS75 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T4S9 as7s

)

SURFACE PICX STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 5975 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 8975 ) 3URFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 5S75 ) SURFACE PICX STRENGTH. WAX (TAPPI T4S9 6S75 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 as75 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH. WAX ( TAPPI T4S9 3S75 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 3975 ) SURFACE PICX STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 3375 ) SURFACE PICX STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 3S75 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAT ( TAPPI T459 8S75 ) SUPFACE PICX STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 3375 ) SURFACE PICX STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 8S75 ) SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX ( TAPPI T459 3375 )

- 73 DEGREES

57
WAX

NUMBER

SURFACE PICK STRENGTH, WAX

SAMPLE 888 =7-3 WAX NUMBER SAMPLE G44 = 17.4 WAX NUMBER

j i i i i i

i

(XI

o

C\J

CD

00

rCD

LD

+ .X.« NOT [N GRAND MEANS

o ANALYSIS T50-1

CL. n

CL

CO

o

© © © ooo

o

©o

©

©

SAMPLE B88

6 7 8

WAX NUMBER

10 11 12

58
PEB-N* N 0, fega TAPBf QflLLAflflBATI VB 1EFB8EM6E PBOQRAM APBXL 1 88P ANALYSIS T91-1 TAELS 1 OflNeaBA MBBIUM TEST, NB»T8N8< CMT ) TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T6Q8 08-71, PLAT CB08H OF dflaaDGATIMG MBBIUM

SAMPLE 26 LB !LINES SAMPLE TUBE WINDING TEST B.'• 10 UB Z26 196 0 SAMS PBS SQUARE METES 062 133 OS AMS PBS SQUABS MB"29

e* oe MEAN DEV N .DEV BOB B.SDB MEAN DEV M.DBV 80S B.SQ9 VA8 P - lab

T 1 «2 319. -11 . -.S3 20. 1.09 360. l . .03 9. .88 SIN 0 L188

!.US 340 . ia. .88 16. .81 368. 19. 1.11 9. .8? 91A 0 Lias

L2 1 “ 361 . 21 . 1 .08 14. .18 337. - ta. -.10 18. 1 .07 91A s Lata

’ 242 304. -26. -i .as 30. 1.66 382. 2. .13 24. 1 .44 9 10 4 L 24 2

' 240 346 . 16. .90 21. 1.16 384. 4. .28 30. 1 .82 9 1

a L 24 8

T 264 302. -26. -1.39 2«. 1.33 336. -13. -.18 16. .97 91P 8 L 269

7.2“ 4 332. 2. .09 20. 1.12 382. 3. .18 20. 1.22 9 IP 0 L274

T 2 00 35". 67. 3.30 30. 1.66 393. 44. 2.31 19. 1 .16 9 IN • L28C

T 3 1 3 252. -78. -3. as 14. .79 290. -60. -3.46 12. .11 91L • L3 1 3

’.32? 341 . 1 1 . .S3 16. .89 369. 19. 1.13 12. .75 9 1 P 0 L32®

T.3 C 4 2 = 6. -34 . -1.65 11. .62 324. -25. - 1.48 10. .62 9 IP 0 L39*

T 444 3Co. -23. - 1 . 15 13. .70 311. -38. -2.20 16. 1 .00 91N a L484

Lfc 2 1 352. 22. 1 . 10 13. .71 362. 13. .14 21 . 1.2" 9 1 P 0 L621

L.6 2 2 335 . 5. .24 15. .84 364 . 14 . .84 15. .93 9 IN o L622

T 666 335. 5 . .25 20. 1.13 366. 17. .97 11 . .67 9 1 P 0 L666

L" 3 3 34? . 1®. .52 21. 1. 14 346. -3. -.19 18. 1 .09 9 1

a L733

rjr . MEAN • 33' . N( CMT ) GRAND MEAN * 349. N< CMT) TEST DETERMINATIONS • 10 SD MFANS 20. y< cvt ) SD OF MEANS • 17. N(CMT) 14 LABS ZN GRAND MEANS

AVERAGE SDR * 18. N( CMT ) AVERAGE SDR • 16. N< CMT ) GP. MEAN * "4.17 POUNDS GRAND MEAN - 78.52 POUNDS NUMBER OF LABORATORIES REPORTING • 16

Best values: Z25 330 ± 36 newtons

G52 350 i 30 newtons

The following laboratories were omitted from the grand

means because of extreme test results: 280, 313.

"E PORT NO. 65S TAPP! OOLLABORA"! VE REFEPENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSI 9 191-1 "ABLE 2 CONCORA MEDIUM TEST, NEWTCNSl CMT

)

TAPPT OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T809 OS-H, FLA" CRUSH OF CORRUGATING MEDIUM

T AB MEANS COORDINATES AVG

'-ODE F 725 G52 MAJ6R MINOR R.3DS VAR PROPERTY- --TEST INSTRUMENT- --CONDITIONS

L313 * 252. 290 . -98. 0. .75 91 L FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH. CONCORA, LIBERTY

! 3« 4 * 296 . 324. -42. 0. .62 9 1 P FLAT CRUSH 9TRENGTH. CONCORA, TMI/HINDE l DAUCH

L26 9 a 30 2. 336. -31 . 7. 1 . 15 91 P FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA, TMI/HINDE DAUCH

L2»2 ft 3' 4. 352. -19. 17. 1 .55 91 G FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA, GAYDON FLAT CPUSH UP4 0 3C6. 311. -42. -16. .85 9 1 N FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA. TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L 1 32 <* 3 19. 350 . -8. 7. .83 91 N FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA. TMI/HINDB A DAUCH

T 2” 4 332. 352. 3. 1 . 1 .17 91 P FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA. TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

t 622 * 33 5 • 364. 13. 8. .89 91 N FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA. TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L666 * 335. 366 . 14. 10. .90 9 1 P FLAT CPUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

T 3P5 34 1 . 365 . 20. 9. .82 91 P FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH. CONCORA, TMI/HINDB A DAUCH

L 1 «5 rA 348. 368. 26. 4. .69 91 A FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH, CONCORA. INSTRON

!. 24 8 348. 354. 17. -8. 1 .49 9 1 B FLAT CRUSP STRENGTH. CONCORA, INSTRON

I" 33 r 349. 346 . 13. -14. 1.11 9 1 P FLAT CRUSH =TSENOTH. CONCORA, TMI/HINDB A DAUCH

L 2 1 8 A 351. 337. 10. -23. .92 91 A FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH. CONCORA, INSTRON

1621 A 352 . 36 2. 26. -3. .99 91 P FLAT CRUSH s r l-NOTH, CONCORA, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L2 6<~ 39". 39 3. 80. -6. 1 .41 91 N FLAT CRUSH STRENGTH. CONCORA. TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

jMF a>’ sj; 3:- . 349. 1 .00

? 5 * EH IPSE: 70. 33. WITH GAMMA - 37 DEGREES

59
280

290

300

310

320

330

340

350

360

370

380

390

400

410

420

CONC0RA ( CMT )

SAMPLE Z25 = 330. N(CMT)

SAMPLE Z25 = 74.2 P0UNOS

SAMPLE G52 = 349-

SAMPLE GS2 = 78-5

N( CMT ) POUNDS

_l LCvj + .X.« NOT IN GRANO MEANS

LD

C2) ANALYSIS T9 1 - 1 LJ

Q_

CL

CO

00

0 0

0

0

-QO

0

O

0

0

0

0

SAMPLE Z25

250 260 270 280 290 300 310 320 330 340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410

N(CMT)

60

I 65 70 75

POUNDS

80

I 85

F 90
REP*P~ N«. 65S TAPPI COLLABORATIVE REFEPENCB PROGRAM APBII 1980 ANALYSIS 196-1 TABLE 1 BINQ CRUSH (COMPRESSION RESISTANCE OF PAPEBBOABD ) TAPPI OFFICIAL TEST METHOD T818 OS-76

SAMPLE 69 LB LINEP. SAMPLE 42 LB LINER TEST D.' 10

I AB Z20 354 GRAMS PER !SQUARE METER Z3 1 211 GRAMS PEB SQUARE METER

''POE MEAN DEV N .DEV SDR R. SDR MEAN DEV N.DEV SDR R. SDR VAR F LAB

LI C7 621 . -63 . -.60 67. 1.90 496. -44 . -.80 49. 1 .81 96P 0 L 107

LI 14 719. 35. .33 38. l.oe 594. 54. .99 13. .49 96P 0 L114

LI 22 569 . -116. -1.11 33. 2.37 458. -82. -1.50 58. 2.14 96P 0 L 1 22

L 1 2 4 337 . 153 . 1.46 29. .82 580. 40. .73 38. 1 .43 96P 0 LI 24 L14 1 713. 34. .32 53. 1.52 559. 20. .36 27. 1 .00 96P 0 L 141

LIS" 567 . -117. -1.12 49. 1.39 528. -12. -.22 39. 1 .44 96P 0 LI 57

T 1' 1 610. -74. -.71 106. 3.08 510. -30 . -.55 47. 1 .73 96N 0 L171

LI P2 ’96

112. 1.07 34. .96 553. 13. .24 22. .80 96N 0 L 1 82

’ 1°1 -’34. 50. .48 24. .69 597 . 58. 1.06 15. .55 96P 0 L 191

T 21 S 531 . -154. -1.47 31 . .88 415. -125. -2.28 36. 1 .33 961 0 L21 8 1234 433. -196. -1.88 21. .6 1 492. -47. -.86 23. .86 96P 0 1234

12 3’ ''20. 36. .34 25. .71 6 07. 68. 1.24 15. .55 96P 0 L 237 L242 ’82. 98 . .S3 25. .70 550. 11 . .20 21 . .80 96G 0 L242

L2 57 674 . -11 . -.10 27. .76 548. 8. . 15 39. 1 .46 96P 0 L 257

T 303 740. 56. .53 34. .96 571. 32. .53 25. .93 96N 0 L3Q3

L305 792. 107. 1.33 36. 1.02 494 . -45. -.83 57. 2.13 96P * L305

L32 = 687 . -4. -.04 12. .34 537. -3. -.05 31. 1.14 96P 0 L329

L333 434. -25C . -2.40 29. .83 440. -99 . -1.81 32. 1 .21 96P 0 L333

1336 563 . -121. -1.16 36. 1.04 447. -92. -1.69 19. .71 96P 0 L336

1.3S" 649. -35. -.34 13. .37 548. 8. . 15 23. .87 96P 0 L350

13«>3 772 • 88. .84 29. .83 585. 45. .83 29. 1 .07 96P 0 L393

14«4 544. -140. -1.34 22. .63 458. -82 . -1.49 17. .63 96R 0 L 484 L553 662. -23. -.22 20. .58 542. 3. . 05 12. .46 96P 0 L 553

T 562 800. US. 1.10 52. 1 .43 622. 83 . 1.51 28. 1 .05 96P 0 L562

L5 - * 743. 59 . .56 60. 1.70 551 . 1 1 . .20 29. 1 .09 96P 0 L 570 T500 727. 43. .41 17. .49 560. 20 . .37 21 . .79 96P 0 L560

L6 03 310 . 125. 1 .20 30. .86 630. 90. 1.65 23. .87 96 P 0 160 3 16 l 0 331 . 146. 1.40 19. .53 591 . 52. .94 20. .75 96P 0 L6 1

Lfc 1’ 723. 38 . .37 27. .76 528. -12. -.22 25. .92 96P 0 L 6 1

L621 842 . 158. 1 .51 35. 1.01 645. 105. 1.93 18. .68 96P 0 L 62

’ 623 687 . 2. .02 18. .50 544 . 4 . .07 11 . .42 96P 0 I 623

L650 ’54. 70 . .67 25. .70 552. 13 . .24 33. 1 .23 96N m L 650

L6 63 540 . -144. -1.38 25. .71 4 99. -50. -.92 34 . 1 .25 96P 0 L663

167 6 676. -9. -.08 43. 1.24 539. -0. -.01 25 . .94 96P 0 I 676

L6 86 657. -27 . -.26 34. .96 561 . 21. .39 18. .6 7 96P 0 L686

L’03 645 . -40 . -.38 36. 1.02 503. -37. -.67 25. .92 96J 0 L703

OR. MEAN • 684

NEWTONS GRAND MEAN * 540

NEWT INS TEST DETERMINATIONS * 10 ED MEANS * 104. NEWTONS SD OF MEANS • 55

NEWTONS 36 LABS IN GRAND MEANS AVERAGE SDR • 35. NEWTONS AVERAGE SDR - 27. NEWTONS

OR. ME A" • 153.9 POUNDS GRAND MEAN - 121.3 POUNDS

“•’"al ntjmbef «f laboratories reporting • 36

Besc values: Z28 690 ± 180 newtons

Z31 540 ± 90 newtons

£1
pp;p«7->- Nfl. 659 TAPPI COLLABORATI VB REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980 ANALYSIS 196-1 "ABLE 2 RING CRUSH (C0MPPES3I0N RESISTANCE OF PAPERBOARD ) TAPPI OFFICIAL TE9T METHOD T818 OS-76

r ab means coordinates avq

C* DE F 228 23 1 MAJOR MINOR R. SDR VAR PROPERTY— -TEST INSTRUMENT— -CONDITIONS

1 333 (A 434. 440 . -269. IS. 1.02 96 P RING CRUSH. TMI/HINDE t DAUCB

L234 489. 492. -198 . 40. .73 96 P PING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE & DAUCH

L218 531 . 415. -192. -48. 1.10 961 PING CRUSH. INSTRON

T tt 3fl 54". 489. -152. 1 5. .98 96 P RING CRUSH. TMI/HINDE & DAUCH

L48 4 M 544. 45e. -162. -15. .63 96R PING CRUSH. REGMED

L2 36 * 563 . 447 . -149 . -33. .87 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINOE A DAUCH

’Ll 5^ * 567. 528. -111. 39. 1 .4 1 96 P RING CRUSH. TMI/HTNDE A DAUCH

T

1 22 •a 56 9. 458. -139. -26. 2.26 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

T 1' 1 6 1". 5 1C • -80. 4. 2.41 96N SING CRUSH. TMI/HTNDE A DAUCH

11 ’ M 621 . 496. -76. -13. 1 .86 96P RING CRUSH. TMI/HINDB A DAUCH

ir 3 * 645. 5«3. -51. -16. .97 96 J RING CRUSH, INSTRON

T- 35^ fl 649 . 548. -28. 22. .62 96 P °ING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L6 8c 6 657. 561 . -IS. 31. .82 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L55 3 a 662. 542. -19. 12. .52 96 P RING CRUSH. TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

T 25^ a 674. 548. -6. 12. 1.11 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

T 6 76 a 6"6. 539. -8. 3. 1 .09 96 P RING CRUSH, TMT/HINDE A DAUCH

L32« 680. 537. -5. -1. .74 96P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

1623 a 697. 544. 4. 3. .46 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

T 141 4 719. 559. 39. 4. 1 .26 96 P RING CRUSH, "MI/HINDE A DAUCH

LI 1 4 a 719. 594. 54. 35. .78 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L237 3 *20. 607 . 6 1. 46. .63 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L6 1 7 a 723. 528. 30. -27. .84 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

T 5 50 a 7 27. 560 . 47. 0. .64 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

LI 9 1 4 734. 597. 70. 31. .62 96 P RING CRUSH. TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

: 3^3 74". 571 . 64. 5. .95 96 N RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

I 5“rr a ”43. 551 . 58. -15. 1.40 96 P RING CRUSH, TMT/HINDE A DAUCH

L6 5'- a "54. 552. 69. -18. .96 96 N PING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

T 393 * 772. 585. 90. 4. .95 96 P PING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L2 4 2 a 782. 55C . 93. -31. .75 96G RING CRUSH, GAYDSN FLAT CRUSB TESTER

L3 r 5 * 792. 4 94. 78. -86. 1.58 96 P PING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

LI 82 a 796 . 553. 107. -35. .83 96 N RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCB

L562 a 800. 622. 139. 26. 1 .26 96 P RING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCH

L6 0 3 8 10. 630. 152. 29. .87 S6P PING CRUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCB

L6 1 0 * 831 . 591 . 155. -15. .64 96 P PING CRU CH

,

"MI/HINDE A DAUCH

LI 24 a 8 3". 580. 1 55. -28. 1.13 96 P RING CRUSH. TMI/HINDE & DAUCH

L6 21 * 842. 64 5. 187. 29. .85 96 P PING CPUSH, TMI/HINDE A DAUCB

'NFA»'T: 684. S4C . 1.C0 9S« ELLIPSE: 29". 74. WITH GAMMA • 24 DEGREES

62
RING CRUSH

SAMPLE Z28 = 684. NEWTONS SAMPLE Z31 = 540- NEWTONS

SAMPLE Z28 = 154 POUNDS SAMPLE Z31 = 121 POUNOS

NEWTONS

i 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 30 100 120 140 160 180 200 220

POUNDS

63
REFCR" NO. 693 TAPPT COLLABORATIVE REFERENCE PROGRAM APRIL 1980

SUMMARY TABLE

SAMPLE GRAND SD OP AVER «EPL LABS LABS REPL "EST METHOD CODE MEAN MEAN SDR cap INCL PARTIC TAPP! REPEAT REPROD

BtTOc-^T MG stpeNQ'^H, MODEL C G34 18.03 1.24 1.10 15 38 55 10 .96 3.4e

"10-1 PSI GAS 12.49 . 54 .73 .64 1.53

BU °S"~ VT G STRENGTH, MODEL C-A G34 18.31 1.53 1.05 15 40 46 10 .92 CD * • "10-? PSI GAS 12.36 .57 .65 .57 1.61

B V5 C TT NG «TRENG"H, HIGH RANGE A77 60.0 2.9 4.6 15 45 59 10 4.0 3.5

-11-1 RSI E89 50 .6 2.5 4. 1 3.6 7.2

-EA’'VG STFENGTK. PRINTING PAPERS G36 62.46 3.11 2.18 15 127 151 10 l .91 8.70

-19-1 G P AMS G47 38.40 2.06 1.19 1 .04 5.75 “EASING STFENGTH, PACKAGING PAPERS K50 109 .7 5.4 4.8 IS 12 22 10 4.2 15.0

"16-1 GRAMS G49 80.5 4.0 2.6 2.3 11.1 TVS’lE £

"T'ENG't*H . PACKAGING PAPERS G33 11.53 .43 .52 20 52 57 19 .45 1.23

"15-1 KILONEWTeN/M G49 10.45 .38 .40 .35 1.09

"Fv c~ LE STR . , CPE, PPINTING PAPERS G40 4.80 .28 .28 20 52 59 10 .25 .80

-EC-1 KTL0NEWT8N/M G33 3.89 .20 .19 .16 .55

"EM CT LE STB., PENDULUM, PRINTING P, G4 0 4.89 .27 .27 20 43 46 10 .24 .78 -20-? KILONERTON/M G33 3.91 .26 .19 . 16 .74 ".Z.A., PACKAGING “APERS G38 101 .5 11.3 12.2 20 21 22 10 10.7 32.3

"25-1 JOULES/SQ M G49 120.9 11.5 12.0 1 1 .4 32.9

".F..A., MINTING PAPERS G40 46.0 4.2 6.2 20 18 23 10 5.4 12.3 "26-1 JOUIES/SQ M G33 38.3 4.2 4.6 4.0 12. 1 FLOVCATIov "0 BPEAK, PACKAGING PAPER G3 8 1.521 .169 .139 20 22 22 10 .121 .477

"2 ? - l PERCENT G49 1 .894 .174 . 156 . 137 .492

E* “VGA"! ON T9 BREAK, PRINTING PAPER G4 0 1.488 .166 . 137 20 1 9 26 10 .120 .467

"26-1 PERCENT G33 1.509 .144 . 138 . 121 .409

F9LDI V'G ENDURANCE (MIT) B69 200.6 72.9 se.6 IS 4 1 49 1C 51.4 204.

1

"20-1 DOUBLE FOLDS G2 8 26.8 6.0 7.8 6.8 17.1 feeding endurance (mtt) B69 2.25 .19 . 14 15 42 49 10 .13 .54 "3 0-2 LOGC 10 ) F 31

D

02 8 1 .41 . 1 1 .13 . 1 1 .32

"T7 FFNES S , GURLEY B69 77.2 T.S 4.9 10 2 e 33 10 4.3 21.9

"35-1 GURLEY UNITS H72 170.2 12.9 9.7 8.5 35. 9

RT~FFNF.se, "ABER 02 9 6.87 .81 .39 10 32 38 5 .49 2.26

"26-1 TABER UNITS BS6 4.47 .74 .36 .45 2.C 7

SUPFACF PICK STRENGTH, IGT 98 8 31.5 13.2 3.0 4 1 0 15 4 4. 1 36.5

" 40-1 KP CM/3EC G44 119.1 68.9 5.0 7.0 190.7 SURFACE PICK STPENGTH, * AX B8S 7.28 .52 .49 5 17 20 5 .61 1.43

"50-1 RAX NUMBER G44 17.42 1.14 .19 .24 3. 17 C0NCO®A ( GMT ) Z2S 330. 20. 18. 10 14 16 10 16. 56.

"9 l-l N< CMT

)

GS2 349. 17. 16. 14. 48 . o*VG CRUSH Z28 684. 104. 35. 10 36 36 10 31. 289 . "96-1 NERtqvS Z3 1 54 0. 55. 27. 24. 152 .

64
NBS-1 14A iMKV. v 7b'

U.S. DEPT. OF COMM.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA

SHEET

1. PUBLICATION OR REPORT NO. TAPPI CRP 65S

2* Gov't AccomIoti No.

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

Technical Association of the Pulp and Paper Industry

Collaborative Reference Program for Paper

Report // 65S

5. Publication Date Sept. 3, 1980

'

7. AUTHOR(S) R. G. Powell, J. Horlick

8. Performing Organ. Report No. NBSIR 80-1840

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

WASHINGTON, DC 20234

16. Project/Task/Work doit No.

2

: y

' : "

11. Contract/Grant No.

12. SPONSORING ORGANIZATION NAME AND COMPLETE ADDRESS (Street, City, state, ZIP)

Collaborative Testing Services, Inc., 8343-A Greensboro

Drive, McLean, VA 22102 and Technical Association of the

Pulp and Paper Industry

13. Type of Report & Period Covered

FINAL

15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

|_1 Document describes a computer program; SF-185, FIPS Software Summary, is attached.

16. ABSTRACT (A 100-word or leas factual summary of moat significant information. If document includes a significant bibliography or

literature survey, mention it here.)

Collaborative Reference Programs provide participating, laboratories

with the means for checking periodically the level and uniformity of

their testing in comparison with that of other participating laboratories. An important by-product of the programs is the provision of

realistic pictures of the state of the testing art. This is one of the

periodic reports showing averages for each participant, within and

between laboratory variability, and other information for participants

and standards committees.

17. KEY WORDS ( six to twelve entries; alphabetical order; capitalize only the first letter of the first key word unless a proper name

;

separated by semi colons) Collaborative reference program; Laboratory evaluation; Paper;

Precision; Reference samples; Testing calibration

18. AVAILABILITY Unlimited

For Official Distribution. Do Not Release to NTIS

1 ; Order From Sup. of Doc., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

20402, SD Stock No. SN003-003-

I I Order From National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA. 22161

19. SECURITY CLASS 21. NO. OF

(THIS REPORT) PRINTED PAGES

UNCLASSIFIED 71

20. SECURITY CLASS 22. Price (THIS PAGE)

UNCLASSIFIED

USCOMM-DC