APPENDIX H 

Status of Minor Route Variations 
 
APPENDIX H-1 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

 

APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-1

APPENDIX H-1 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

PA-SU-002.000 

PA-SU-002.000

0.5 Deviation was developed 

to follow a property 

boundary.

Adopted into the Primary 

Route.

Yes

ALT-T-UA-PA-SU-003.002 

ALT-T-UA-PA-SU-004.001 

ALT-T-PA-SU-005.000

2.3 Deviation was developed 

to avoid a structure.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes. Landowner property 

ALT-T- UA-PA-SU004.000 almost 

completely avoided by 

pipeline and workspace.

ALT-A-PA-SU-013.000 

ALT-A-PA-SU-004.000

4.15 Deviation was developed 

to avoid a barn.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-A-PA-SU-019.000 

ALT-A-UA-PA-SU-021.000 

ALT-A-PA-SU-020.000

5.35 Deviation was developed 

to move closer towards 

western property line.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

ALT-A-PA-SU-024.000 

ALT-A-PA-SU-026.000 

ALT-A-PA-027.000 

ALT-A-PA-SU-028.000

6.1 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

camper.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-A-PA-SU-033.000 7.7 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

home.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

ALT-A-PA-SU-033.000 

ALT-A-PA-SU-036.000

8.3 Deviation was developed 

to move route away from a 

landowner’s property line.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

PA-SU-070.000 

PA-SU-071.000 

PA-SU-072.000 

PA-SU-073.000 

PA-SU-074.000 

UA-PA-SU-075.001 

PA-SU-079.000 

PA-SU-081.000 

PA-SU-082.000 

PA-SU-083.000 

PA-SU-084.000 

PA-SU-085.000 

PA-SU-087.000

12.7 This deviation was 

developed at the request of 

landowners to move the 

pipeline to the “back” 

property line away from 

their homes and to move 

the route away from a 

Bluestone Pipeline well 

pad. This route also 

avoids a high quality 

wetland. 

Adopted in Proposed 

Route. Originally named 

the Brushville Road Minor 

route deviation.

Yes

PA-SU-074.000 

PA-SU-073.000

12.7 This deviation was 

developed to move pipeline 

closer to the Bluestone 

Pipeline.

The route deviation was 

not adopted. This re-route 

was replaced by another 

re-route which was 

approved and adopted to 

avoid power poles at the 

Lewis Corners Road 

crossing.

No

PA-SU-070.000 

PA-SU-071.000 

PA-SU-072.000 

PA-SU-073.000 

PA-SU-074.000 

UA-PA-SU-075.001 

PA-SU-079.000 

PA-SU-081.000 

PA-SU-082.000 

PA-SU-083.000 

PA-SU-084.000 

PA-SU-085.000

12.7 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline closer to a 

property boundary.

Brushville Road Minor 

Route Deviation. 

Investigation has 

determined that an 

existing well pad conflicts 

with this deviation. 

Therefore, it has not been 

incorporated into the 

Proposed Route.

No

   
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-2

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

PA-SU-081.000 

PA-SU-082.000 

PA-SU-083.000

13.5 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

home.

Brushville Road Minor 

route deviation. Replaced 

by a new route deviation.

Yes

PA-SU-082.000 

UA-PA-SU-088.001 

PA-SU-090.000 

PA-SU-091.000

13.9 Avoidance of conservation 

easement.

Brushville Road Minor 

route deviation. This route 

was not adopted. Re-route 

adds approximately 500 

feet of pipe.

No

PA-SU-088.000 

UA-PA-SU-088.001 

PA-SU-089.000 

PA-SU-090.000 

PA-SU-091.000

14.6 This deviation was 

developed to move away 

from a quarry.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

PA-SU-112.000 

PA-SU-107.000 

PA-SU-108.000 

PA-SU-109.000

18.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

quarry.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation. Quarry property 

PA- SU-112.000 

completely avoided.

Yes

PA-SU-121.000 

PA-SU-122.000 

PA-SU-123.000

23.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid homes.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

PA SU 128.000 

PA-SU-127.000

24.8 Landowner requested the 

pipeline abut the existing 

Bluestone Pipeline Rightof-Way.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-003.000 26.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid close 

proximity to a home.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-002.000 

ALT-B-UA-NY-BR-002.001 

ALT-B-NY-BR-004.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-003.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-007.000

27.0 This deviation was 

developed to avoid homes.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-B-UA-NY-BR-012.001 27.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

structure.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-015.001 

ALT-B-NY-BR-016.002 

ALT-B-NY-BR-016.003

28.95 This re-route was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from homes.

The route deviation was 

not adopted. 

(Re-route rejected by 

Constitution due to impacts 

on cultural resources).

No

ALT-B-NY-BR-023.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-020.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-024.000

30.9 This deviation was 

developed to avoid homes.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-024.000 

ALT-B-UA-NY-BR-025.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-026.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-028.000

31.4 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a burial 

site with ash remains.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-028.000 31.6 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

property corner.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Landowner 

completely avoided.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-032.000 32.9 This deviation was 

developed to avoid homes.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-3

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

ALT-B-NY-BR-037.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-039.000

34.0 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

property entirely.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation. 

ALT-B-NY-BR-038.000 is 

now completely avoided.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-040.000 34.5 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a barn 

and relocate the route 

along a tree line.

Information collected by 

Constitution determined 

this route is not feasible 

and was not incorporated. 

ALT-B-NY-BR-040.000 is 

now completely avoided.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-042.000 34.54 No deviation developed. 

Cemetery plot discovered 

at this location.

Determined by 

Constitution’s cultural 

resource consultant that 

there are no conflicts with 

the location of the 

Proposed Route in relation 

to the cemetery plot.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-054.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-055.000

36.9 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

geological features.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-071.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-072.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-073.000 

ALT-B-UA-NY-BR-073.001

40.05 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

structure.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-072.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-073.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-074.000

40.3 This deviation was 

developed to move pipeline 

further away from a cabin.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

ALT-B-UA-NY-BR-077.001 40.95 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

underground structures.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-BR-077.002 41.3 This deviation was 

developed to offset the 

pipeline 300 feet to 400 

feet from a roadway.

The route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that re-route would add 

unacceptable additional 

length.

No

ALT-B-NY-BR-082.003 41.8 A deviation was proposed 

at this location to move the 

pipeline away from a water 

well.

The route deviation 

proposal was not adopted. 

(But see our 

recommendation below)

No

ALT-B-NY-BR-083.005 

ALT-B-NY-BR-083.006 

NY-CH-001.004

42.2 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a future 

proposed home location.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Constitution’s land 

agent confirmed future 

home location.

Yes

NY-CH-005.004 

NY-CH-005.002 

NY-CH-010.002 

NY-CH-010.003

44.0 This deviation was 

developed to minimize 

impacts on subdivided lots.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-CH-032.000 

NY-CH-031.000 

NY-CH-033.000

49.1 This deviation was 

developed to minimize 

impacts on sensitive land 

features.

The route deviation was 

not adopted. This re-route 

was replaced by a 

combination of two other 

re-routes. A combination 

of both re-routes address 

the two landowners 

concerns. 

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-4

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-CH-031.000, NY-CH032.000 

NY-CH-033.000

49.3 This deviation was 

developed as a 

compromise between two 

landowners to route 

pipeline along a shared 

property line.

The route deviation was 

not adopted. This re-route 

was replaced by a 

combination of two reroutes which were 

adopted.

Yes

NY-CH-031.000 

NY-CH-032.000 

NY-CH-033.000

49.3 This deviation was 

developed after an 

agreement between two 

landowners was made. 

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes.

NY-CH-032.000 

NY-CH-033.000

49.3 This deviation was 

developed to minimize 

impact on mature trees.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-CH-033.000 49.4 This deviation was 

developed to collocate 

pipeline with roadway.

This route was not adopted 

due to major pipe length 

increases.

No

NY-CH-031.000 

NY-CH-032.000 

NY-CH-033.000 

NY-CH-034.000 

NY-CH-035.000

49.7 This deviation was 

developed to minimize 

impacts on sensitive land 

features between two 

landowners.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-CH-034.000 

NY-CH-035.000

50.0 This deviation was 

developed to move away 

from a home.

This route was not 

adopted. Constitution 

determined route could not 

be investigated because 

landowner had not granted 

survey permission. 

No

NY-DE-013.000 

NY-DE-016.000

53.8 This route deviation was 

developed to avoid 

socioeconomic factors.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that re-route would go 

through a beaver pond and 

be placed in close 

proximity electric 

transmission guy wires and 

anchors.

 No

NY-DE-024.000 55.9 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

home.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-DE-029.000 56.5 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a home 

and for a better creek 

crossing location.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-DE-030.000 56.7 This deviation was 

developed to potentially 

improve routing.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that re-route would result in 

additional pipeline length 

and pose constructability 

issues.

No

NY-DE-034.000 

UA-NY-DE-035.001 

NY-DE-035.000

58.6 This deviation was 

developed to route around 

a rest area (NYSDOT 

managed land).

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-DE-042.000 

NY-DE-043.000 

NY-DE-044.000

60.5 This deviation was 

developed to route away 

from a water well.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-5

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-DE-045.000 

NY-DE-048.000 

NY-DE-049.000 

NY-DE-050.000

61.8 This deviation was 

developed to route away 

from some fields.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that re-route would 

increase wetland impacts. 

Re-route replaced by 

another re-route. 

Constitution 

representatives met with 

the two landowners 

affected by the re-route 

and received landowner 

approval.

Yes

NY-DE-063.000 

NY-DE-066.000 

NY-DE-067.000 

UA-NY-DE-067.002 

NY-DE-070.000 

NY-DE-071.000 

NY-DE-072.000

64.0 This deviation is one of two 

options developed to move 

pipeline closer to property 

boundary.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-DE-070.000 

NY-DE-071.000 

NY-DE-072.000

64.9 This deviation is one of two 

options developed to avoid 

trees and a tree stand.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. This re-route 

was replaced by another 

re-route which was 

adopted. 

Yes

NY-DE-070.000 

NY-DE-071.000

64.9 This deviation is one of a 

couple of options 

developed to avoid trees 

and a tree stand.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. 

Yes

NY-DE-072.000 

NY-DE-077.000 

NY-DE-074.000 

NY-DE-075.000 

NY-DE-076.000

65.6 This deviation was 

developed to move away 

from a pond and numerous 

trees.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-DE-072.000 

NY-DE-077.000

65.6 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

sensitive land features.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-DE-080.000 67.0 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

sensitive land features.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

at the time of review that 

the re-route adds 420 feet 

and would require the 

relocation of a MLV 

assembly in close proximity 

to a radio tower.

No

NY-DE-092.000 

NY-DE-093.000 

NY-DE-094.000 

NY-DE-095.000 

NY-DE-096.000

69.8 This deviation was 

developed to move away 

from a cabin and 

unfavorable terrain.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Constitution 

representatives met with 

landowner to develop reroute.

Yes

NY-DE-093.000 

NY-DE-094.000 

NY-DE-095.000

69.9 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

route along the wooded 

edge of property.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-DE-098.000 

NY-DE-099.000 

NY-DE-101.000

71.1 This deviation is one of a 

couple of options 

developed to avoid a 

landowner’s trees.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Constitution to 

confirm that workspace will 

not impact trees.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-6

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-DE-098.000 

NY-DE-099.000 

NY-DE-101.000

71.1 This deviation is one of two 

options developed to avoid 

a landowner’s trees.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. This re-route 

was replaced by another 

route deviation which was 

approved and adopted. 

Constitution to confirm that 

workspace will not impact 

trees.

Yes

NY-DE-101.000 

NY-DE-100.000 

NY-DE-103.000

71.5 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

property.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-DE-129.000 

NY-DE-130.000 

NY-DE-131.000

76.6 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

route away from a future 

proposed home.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-DE-139.000 

NY-DE-140.000 

NY-DE-141.000 

UA-NY-DE-141.001 

NY-DE-144.000 

UA-NY-DE-144.001 

NY-DE-145.000 

NY-DE-146.000 

NY-DE-147.000 

NY-DE-148.000

77.4 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

route from sensitive 

properties features.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-DE-153.000 

NY-DE-154.000 

NY-DE-154.002 

NY-DE-155.000 

NY-DE-155.003 

NY-DE-155.007 

NY-DE-155.008 

NY-DE-158.001 

NY-DE-158.002 

NY-DE-165.004 

NY-DE-165.002 

NY-DE-165.006 

NY-DE-165.010 

NY-DE-165.008 

NY-DE-165.011 

NY-DE-165.012 

NY-DE-175.002 

NY-DE-175.004 

NY-DE-179.001 

NY-DE-179.002 

NY-DE-180.000 

NY-DE-181.000 

NY-DE-182.000 

NY-DE-183.000

80.8 Avoid Town of East 

Meredith.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. 

Yes

NY-DE-155.000 

NY-DE-157.000 

NY-DE-156.000 

NY-DE-158.000 

NY-DE-159.000 

NY-DE-160.000

80.8 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

route further from a 

structure.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Re-route 

replaced by another reroute. Land tract is no 

longer affected by the 

proposed pipeline route.

Yes

NY-DE-160.000 81.1 This deviation was 

developed to address 

distance to a home and 

side-slopes.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. This property 

is no longer affected by the 

pipeline route.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-7

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-DE-177.001 82.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid an 

existing block wall and 

water well.

Proposed Route no longer 

impacts property with 

existing block wall and 

water well. Property no 

longer affected.

Yes

NY-DE-207.000 

NY-DE-205.000 

NY-DE-208.000

88.5 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 

home.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

UA-NY-DE-224.001 

UA-NY-DE-224.001 

ALT-C-DE-001.000 

ALT-C-DE-002.000 

ALT-C-DE-003.000 

ALT-C-DE-004.000 

NY-DE-226.000 

NY-DE-226.000 

NY-DE-229.000

90.0 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

forested land.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution 

determined that re-route 

affects several new 

landowners to avoid one 

landowner. The route adds 

several additional turns 

and is not the most 

favorable route. This reroute is also close to a 

cemetery at Titus Lake Rd. 

crossing. It also parallels 

propane line that has had 

issues in the past.

No

NY-DE-224.000 

UA-NY-DE-224.001 

ALT-C-DE-001.000 

ALT-C-DE-002.000 

ALT-C-DE-003.000 

ALT-C-DE-004.000 

ALT-C-DE-005.000 

NY-DE-230.000 

UA-NY-DE-227.003 

NY-DE-231.000 

NY-DE-232.000

90.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

sensitive land features.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that re-route would impact 

26 new landowners if 

implemented.

No

NY-DE-232.000 

NY-DE-231.000

92.7 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

sensitive land features.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-DE-233.000 

NY-DE-231.000 

NY-SC-001.000

93.1 This deviation was 

developed to allow a future 

subdivision.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-SC-001.000 

NY-SC-002.000 

NY-SC-003.000 

UA-NY-SC-004.002 

UA-NY-SC-004.003 

NY-SC-005.000 

NY-SC-006.000 

Y-SC-007.000 

UA-NY-SC-009.002 

NY-SC-010.001 

ALT-F-NY-SC-003.000

93.6 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

sensitive land features.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-SC-004.006 

NY-SC-005.000 

NY-SC-005.001

94.1 This deviation is the 

modification of a previous 

minor route deviation 

developed to avoid 

sensitive land features.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

ALT-F-NY-SC-020.004 

ALT-F-NY-SC-034.002

98.4 This route deviation was 

developed to avoid a log 

cabin and a property with 

sensitive land features.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-8

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-SC-032.000 

NY-SC-033.000 

NY-SC-034.000

98.4 This deviation was 

developed to offset route 

100 feet or more away 

from a home.

Property no longer 

impacted by Proposed 

Route.

Yes

ALT-F-NY-SC-020.004 

ALT-F-NY-SC-034.002

98.4 This deviation was 

developed to move route 

away from a future home 

and water well site.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-SC-049.000 

NY-SC-050.000 

UA-NY-SC-050.002 

NY-SC-051.000 

NY-SC-052.000

100.7 The deviation was 

developed to move pipeline 

route away from a home.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution 

determined that a re-route 

on this property is no 

longer needed. The 

landowner confirmed that 

original route across the 

property was acceptable.

Yes

NY-SC-051.000 

NY-SC-052.000 

NY-SC-050.000 

NY-SC-053.000

100.7 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline away from a 

structure.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-SC-053.000 

NY-SC-054.000 

NY-SC-055.000

101.0 This deviation was 

developed to route away 

from landowner’s home 

and closer to a pond.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-SC-052.000 

NY-SC-053.000 

NY-SC-054.000

101.0 This deviation was 

developed to route away 

from apple trees.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-SC-055.000 

NY-SC-056.000 

NY-SC-057.000

101.5 This deviation was 

developed to route away 

from homes and septic 

leech fields.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-SC-063.000 102.0 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline away from a home 

and oak trees.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-SC-064.000 

NY-SC-065.000

102.3 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline along a road and 

adjacent property line.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-L-NY-SC-007.000 

ALT-L-NY-SC-008.000 

ALT-L-NY-SC-009.000 

ALT-L-NY-SC-010.000

104.9 This deviation was 

developed to reduce 

impacts on farmland.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-L-NY-SC-008.000 

ALT-L-NY-SC-009.000 

ALT-L-NY-SC-010.000 

ALT-L-NY-SC-011.000 

ALT-L-NY-SC-012.000

105.1 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a 300-

year-old tree that has 

historical importance.

The route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

ALT-R-NY-SC-003.000 

ALT-R-NY-SC-005.000

105.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

sensitive land features.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

ALT-R-NY-SC-015.000 

ALT-R-NY-SC-020.000 

ALT-R-NY-SC-021.000

108.6 This minor route deviation 

was developed to move 

pipeline further away from 

home.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H1-9

APPENDIX H-1 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported to Constitution 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

ALT-R-NY-SC-023.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-006.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-007.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-011.000

111.0 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline to the southern 

property line.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-O-NY-SC-013.003 

ALT-O-NY-SC-013.004 

ALT-O-NY-SC-013.005

112.2 This deviation was 

developed to follow a 

private road north of the 

Jeep Club House.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution 

determined after a meeting 

between a land agent and 

landowner that the 

landowner agrees with the 

Proposed Route south of 

the Jeep Club House.

Yes

ALT-O-NY-SC-015.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-015.002 

ALT-O-NY-SC-016.000

114.5 This deviation was 

developed to trade impacts 

between two landowners. 

Routing has been moved 

from a property where the 

landowner is opposed to 

the project and placed on a 

property in which the 

landowner wants the 

pipeline on property.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. 

Yes

ALT-O-NY-SC-017.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-016.000

115.1 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

farmland.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. This re-route 

was replaced by another 

re-route which was 

adopted.

Yes. NYSDAM was on site 

to help develop this reroute.

NY-SC-156.000 116.4 This deviation was 

developed to avoid sugar 

maple trees.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

ALT-Q-NY-SC-001.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-002.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-002.002 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-003.000 

ALT-Q-UA-NY-SC-003.001 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-006.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-007.000

117.3 This deviation was 

developed to follow the 

property line.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. 

Yes

ALT-Q-NY-SC-021.002 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-017.001 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-016.004

119.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a sand 

filtration system.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes. Constitution 

representatives met with 

landowner to confirm 

extents of sand filtration 

system, which helped 

create re-route.

ALT-Q-NY-SC-032.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-033.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-034.000 

ALT-Q-UA-NY-SC-035.000 

NY-SC-205.000

121.35 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a 

structure.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Re-route not 

technically feasible due to 

limited workspace 

associated with the 

location of the TGP 200 

Line 

No

N/A N/A This deviation was 

developed to allow colocation with the proposed 

EmKey gathering line.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution 

determined that this 

landowner is not affected 

by the pipeline route.

No

____________________ 

For parcels noted in bold we are requesting that Constitution provide additional information. 
 
APPENDIX H-2 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders 

 
 
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H2-1

APPENDIX H-2 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported toby Stakeholders 

Land Parcel ID MP 

Requested Minor Route 

Deviation Description

Constitution Minor Route 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

PA-SU-001.001 0 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a 

home.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that landowner is no longer 

affected.

Yes

ALT-A-PA-SU-020.000 5.3 Deviation was developed 

to avoid a structure.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

PA-SU-061.000 10.7 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a 

home.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. It was 

determined that the reroute will cross the 

Bluestone Pipeline three 

times. 

No

PA-SU-074.000 

Brushville Road minor 

route deviation

12.7 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline from features of 

concern.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

PA-SU-095.000 15.1 This deviation was 

developed to address 

environmental concerns.

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

PA-SU-103.000 

PA-SU-104.000 

PA-SU-106.000 

PA-SU-108.000 

PA-SU-109.000 

ALT-S-PA-SU-001.000 

ALT-S-PA-SU-002.000

17.5 This deviation combines 

two re-route requests: to 

deviate away from a rock 

quarry property and to 

increase distance between 

pipeline workspace and a 

home.

Adopted into Proposed 

Route.

Yes

UA-PA-SU-110.001 18.9 This route deviation was 

developed to move pipeline 

away from a home.

This route deviation was 

not adopted, but was 

replaced by another reroute.

Yes

ALT-S-PA-SU-007.002 21.1 Landowner concerned with 

proximity of alignment to 

future house site. 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

ALT-B-NY-BR-039.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-042.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-039.001 

ALT-B-NY-BR-039.002

34.4 This deviation combines 

two requests. One is to 

avoid a wetland, and the 

other is to route off a 

property with subdivided 

lots.

Adopted into Proposed 

Route.

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-041.000 34.9 This deviation was 

developed to address a 

future subdivision.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation. 

Yes

ALT-B-NY-BR-054.000 37.1 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

geological features.

Adopted into Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-BR-077.000 40.6 Landowner concerned 

current alignment would 

prohibit future development 

of the land. 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

ALT-B-NY-BR-082.000 41.4 Landowner was concerned 

about rights to build a 

house, removal of trees 

and berry bushes, and 

ability to cross the pipeline. 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

   
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H2-2

APPENDIX H-2 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders 

Land Parcel ID MP 

Requested Minor Route 

Deviation Description

Constitution Minor Route 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-CH-001.007 42.5 Landowner requested the 

pipeline be moved to the 

back of their property so as 

to not impact a future gas 

well or home site. 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

NY-CH-001.002 42.6 This deviation was 

requested to move the 

pipeline away from a 

home.

This route deviation is no 

longer needed. The 

landowner’s property is no 

longer affected by route.

Yes

UA-NY-CH-034.003 50.05 This route deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a 

home.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution’s 

reason for not adopting this 

re-route is because the 

pipeline centerline is 

approximately 184 feet 

away from the home 

without the consideration of 

the re-route. The 

landowner’s home is 

already more than 100 feet 

away from the Project’s 

workspace.

Yes

NY-DE-006.000 51.6 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline away from a 

home.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. (Proposed 

route is already 

approximately 260 feet 

from landowner’s home).

No

NY-DE-035.000 

NY-DE-036.000

59.0 This deviation was 

developed to increase 

distance between pipeline 

workspace and a home.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Re-route was 

developed to add 50 

additional feet between the 

pipeline and the home; 

from approximately 109 

feet to approximately 157 

feet.

Yes

NY-DE-035.000 59.0 This deviation was 

developed to increase 

distance between the 

pipeline workspace and a 

home.

This route deviation was 

not adopted, but it was 

replaced by another reroute which was adopted.

Yes

NY-DE-061.000 63.48 This deviation was 

developed to move route 

closer to property 

boundary.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation which was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-DE-061.000 63.48 This deviation was 

developed to move route 

closer to property 

boundary.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation which was 

adopted.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H2-3

APPENDIX H-2 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders 

Land Parcel ID MP 

Requested Minor Route 

Deviation Description

Constitution Minor Route 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-DE-052.000 

NY-DE-053.000 

NY-DE-054.000 

NY-DE-055.000 

NY-DE-056.000 

NY-DE-057.000 

NY-DE-058.000 

NY-DE-059.000 

NY-DE-060.000 

NY-DE-061.000 

NY-DE-062.000 

NY-DE-065.000 

NY-DE-066.000 

NY-DE-067.000 

UA-NY-DE-067.002 

NY-DE-070.000 

NY-DE-071.000 

NY-DE-072.000

63.48 The route deviation moves 

the pipeline to the corner of 

one property, closer to the 

property boundary of 

another, avoids an 

environmental area of 

concern, and moves the 

workspace away from the 

Otsego County boundary 

line.

Adopted into Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-DE-061.000 

NY-DE-067.000

63.48 This deviation was 

developed to move route 

closer to property 

boundary.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation which was 

adopted.

Yes

NY-DE-111.000 72.9 Landowner concerned 

about damage to a 

woodlot, wetlands, and 

stream on the property. 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

NY-DE-124.001 75.35 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline along a property 

boundary.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution’s 

land agents checked the 

deeds and confirmed that 

there is no mention of a 

conservation easement or 

conservancy in deed.

No

NY-DE-127.000 

NY-DE-124.001 

UA-NY-DE-127.001 

NY-DE-129.000

75.4 Deviation developed to 

move route away from a 

future home location, an 

existing home location, and 

closer to a property 

boundary.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation. 

Yes

NY-DE-127.000 

NY-DE-124.001 

UA-NY-DE-127.001 

NY-DE-129.000

75.4 Deviation developed to 

move pipeline away from a 

future home location, an 

existing home location, and 

closer to a property 

boundary.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route as replaced by 

another re-route.

Yes

NY-DE-129.000 76.3 This deviation was 

developed to move route 

closer to property 

boundaries.

This route deviation was 

not adopted, but was 

replaced by another reroute.

Yes

NY-DE-130.000 76.6 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a future 

proposed home.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H2-4

APPENDIX H-2 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders 

Land Parcel ID MP 

Requested Minor Route 

Deviation Description

Constitution Minor Route 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-DE-137.000 77.2 Landowner concerned with 

proximity of pipeline to 

home (100 feet) and 

because the alignment cuts 

the property in half. 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

NY-DE-138.000 

UA-NY-DE-138.001

77.3 This deviation was 

developed to move pipeline 

further away from home 

and to minimize impacts on 

trees and a garden.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution 

determined that the Project 

alignment already achieved 

the greatest distance from 

the landowners home by 

not impacting landowner’s 

trees.

No

NY-DE-149.001 

UA-NY-DE-148.002 

NY-DE-144.003

79.4 This deviation is one of a 

couple of options 

developed to increase 

distance between pipeline 

workspace and a home.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-DE-149.001 79.4 This deviation was 

developed to increase 

distance between pipeline 

workspace and a home.

This deviation was not 

adopted, but was replaced 

by another re-route.

Yes

NY-DE-191.000 85.2 This deviation was 

developed to straighten 

and shorten the route.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Constitution will 

conduct further 

investigation to determine 

landowner resolution 

status.

Uncertain

NY-DE-199.000 86.6 Landowner concerned with 

proximity of pipeline to 

home (25-50 feet). 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

NY-DE-204.000 88.1 This deviation was initially 

requested to move the 

pipeline away from a 

home. However, moving 

the route away from a 

home was not possible due 

to another home on the 

opposite side of the route. 

As a result, the adopted 

route does not improve on 

the home proximity issue 

but does improve on the 

adjacent creek crossing.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation.

Yes

NY-DE-208.000 89.0 This deviation was 

developed to further the 

distance from a home and 

to minimize tree removal 

on the property.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H2-5

APPENDIX H-2 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders 

Land Parcel ID MP 

Requested Minor Route 

Deviation Description

Constitution Minor Route 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-DE-226.000 90.8 This deviation was 

developed to avoid 

forested land.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Constitution 

reviewed five proposed reroutes for this property 

submitted through the 

landowner and/or FERC. 

The proposed re-routes 

were not adopted for 

various reasons including: 

1) the re-route followed a 

propane line with 

documented safety issues, 

added too many points of 

inflection to the line, and 

was located too close to a 

cemetery; 2) the re-route 

increased impact area on 

the property and located 

the pipeline through a 

wetland; 3) the re-route 

increased impact area on 

the property and included 

90 degree angles that 

posed constructability 

issues; 4) the re-route 

followed the same propane 

line noted above and 

impacted 13 landowners 

versus 2 landowners; and 

5) the re-route impacted 26 

new landowners versus the 

one landowner of the 

subject property (But see 

our recommendation 

above).

No

UA-NY-SC-004.000 93.9 This deviation was 

developed due to 

landowner request to 

reduce impacts on sugar 

bush and beech-maple 

forest.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

NY-SC-045.000 

NY-SC-047.000 

NY-SC-049.000 

NY-SC-048.000

100.2 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

route along forest lines.

This route deviation was 

not adopted due to 

increased forest and 

wetland impacts. 

Replaced by another reroute.

Yes

NY-SC-046.000 

NY-SC-047.000 

NY-SC-048.000 

NY-SC-049.000 

NY-SC-050.000 

NY-SC-051.000

100.2 This deviation was 

developed to move route 

closer to property 

boundaries.

This route deviation was 

not adopted, but was 

replaced by another reroute.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H2-6

APPENDIX H-2 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders 

Land Parcel ID MP 

Requested Minor Route 

Deviation Description

Constitution Minor Route 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

NY-SC-044.000 

NY-SC-045.000 

NY-SC-046.000 

NY-SC-047.000 

NY-SC-048.000 

NY-SC-049.000 

NY-SC-050.000 

UA-NY-SC-050.004 

NY-SC-051.000

100.3 This deviation was 

developed to avoid a rock 

wall, house foundation, and 

property corner.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Constitution 

representatives met with 

the landowner to discuss 

the landowner’s plans for 

re-route.

Yes

NY-SC-057.000 101.5 This deviation was 

developed to route away 

from homes and septic 

leech fields.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation. 

Yes

NY-SC-061.000 101.8 A deviation was requested 

to address concerns with 

the pipeline route being 

adjacent to an organic 

garlic business and apiary 

(honey bees).

This route deviation was 

not adopted. After 

reviewing this property, 

Constitution determined 

the pipeline is routed 

through the landowner’s 

northwestern property 

corner.

No

NY-SC-063.000 101.8 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline away from a home 

and oak trees.

This route deviation was 

not adopted, but was 

replaced by another reroute.

Yes

NY-SC-061.000 

NY-SC-062.000 

NY-SC-063.000 

NY-SC-064.000

101.9 This deviation was 

developed to route further 

away from a home.

This route deviation was 

replaced by another route.

Yes

NY-SC-064.000 

NY-SC-065.000

102.0 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline along a road and 

adjacent property line. 

This route deviation was 

adopted.

Yes

ALT-O-NY-SC-007.000 111.0 This deviation was 

developed to route the 

pipeline to the southern 

property line.

This route deviation was 

not adopted, but was 

replaced by another 

deviation.

Yes

ALT-R-NY-SC-021.000 

ALT-R-NY-SC-022.000 

ALT-R-NY-SC-023.000 

ALT-R-NY-SC-023.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-006.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-007.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-011.000

111.1 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline along a property 

boundary.

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. Determined at the 

time of review to hold off 

on an evaluation of a reroute until survey 

permission is granted by 

the landowner.

No

ALT-O-NY-SC-013.003 112.1 This deviation request was 

generated so that the route 

would not traverse the 

center of the property.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that Proposed Route does 

not cut the landowners 

property in half.

Yes

ALT-O-NY-SC-013.010 

ALT-O-NY-SC-014.000

113.7 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline along a property 

boundary.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H2-7

APPENDIX H-2 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Reported by Stakeholders 

Land Parcel ID MP 

Requested Minor Route 

Deviation Description

Constitution Minor Route 

Deviation Status

Landowner Resolution? 

(Yes/No)

ALT-O-NY-SC-014.001 113.9 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline along a property 

boundary.

This route deviation was 

not adopted. Determined 

that the Proposed Route 

would not affect a future 

proposed home location.

No

ALT-O-NY-SC-015.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-017.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-022.000

114.1, 

115.0, 

and 

115.6 

The route could disrupt 

farming operations and 

make the landowner out of 

compliance with their 

agricultural permits. 

Pending (But see our 

recommendation above).

No 

ALT-O-UA-NY-SC-018.000 115.1 This deviation was 

developed to move pipeline 

away from a home.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. NYSDAM met 

Constitution field routers to 

help come up with this 

route.

Yes

ALT-Q-NY-SC-010.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-011.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-012.000

117.9 This deviation was 

developed to move the 

pipeline away from a future 

home location.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route. Constitution’s field 

routers confirmed future 

home location with the 

landowner.

Yes

ALT-Q-NY-SC-013.000 118.4 This deviation was 

developed to route further 

away from a pond.

Adopted into the Proposed 

Route.

Yes

____________________ 

For parcels noted in bold we are requesting that Constitution provide additional information. 
 
APPENDIX H-3 

Status of Minor Route Variations Assessed for 

Impacts on Agricultural Lands 

 
 
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H3-1

APPENDIX H-3 

Status of Minor Route Variations Assessed for Impacts on Agricultural Lands 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status

NY Agriculture and 

Markets Resolution 

(Yes/No)

ALT-B-NY-BR-020.000 30.1 Deviation to minimize 

impact on farmland.

Opted into the Proposed 

Route. Constitution field 

router met with NYSDAM 

and landowner to develop 

re-route.

Yes

NY-CH-011.000 

NY-CH-013.000 

NY-CH-012.000 

NY-CH-014.000 

UA-NY-CH-015.001

NY-CH-017.000

45.9 Deviation to minimize 

impact on farmland.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation (But see our 

recommendation 

above).

Yes

NY-CH-011.000 

NY-CH-013.000 

NY-CH-012.000 

NY-CH-014.000 

NY-CH-015.000

UA-NY-CH-015.001

NY-CH-016.000 

NY-CH-017.000

46.5 Deviation to minimize 

impact on farmland.

Replaced by new route 

deviation. Constitution 

field router met with 

NYSDAM to develop reroute on landowners’ 

property (But see our 

recommendation 

above).

Yes

NY-DE-045.000 

NY-DE-048.000 

NY-DE-049.000 

NY-DE-050.000

62.0 Deviation to minimize 

impacts on open fields.

Adopted into the 

Proposed Route. Reroute has been moved out 

of agricultural fields.

Yes

NY-DE-049.000 

NY-DE-050.000 

NY-DE-051.000

62.3.9 Deviation to minimize 

impact on farmland.

Replaced by a new route 

deviation. Constitution 

representatives met with 

landowners and 

NYSDAM on site to 

develop a re-route that 

would address both 

landowner concerns.

Yes

ALT-O-NY-SC-015.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-015.002 

ALT-O-NY-SC-016.000 

ALT-O-NY-SC-017.000 

ALT-O-UA-NY-SC-017.001

115.1 Deviation to minimize 

impact on farmland.

Adopted into the 

Proposed Route. 

Constitution field router 

met with NYSDAM to 

develop re-route on 

landowners’ property. 

However, note condition 

above for route variations 

reported to the FERC.

Yes according to 

Constitution, but note 

condition above for route 

variations reported to the 

FERC.

NY-SC-156.000

NY-SC-152.000

NY-SC-160.000

ALT-Q-NY-SC-001.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-002.000 

ALT-Q-UA-NY-SC-004.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-005.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-006.000

116.4 Deviation to minimize 

impact on farmland; 

a re-route was already 

considered and approved 

for this landowner.

The route deviation was 

not adopted, but a reroute was developed 

already to address 

farmland (maple sugar 

tree operation) impacts 

(But see our 

recommendation 

above). 

Yes

______________________ 

For parcels noted in bold we are requesting that Constitution provide additional information. 
 
APPENDIX H-4 

Status of Minor Route Variations Assessed for Impacts on Water Resources 

 
 
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H4-1

APPENDIX H-4 

Status of Minor Route Variations Assessed for Impacts on Water Resources 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP 

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status 

Agency Resolution 

(Yes/No) 

ALT-B-NY-BR-015.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-020.002 

28.7 Minimize impacts on 

stream BR-1H-S178. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

ALT-B-NY-BR-020.000 30.3 Minimize impacts on 

stream BR-1I-S001. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

ALT-B-NY-BR-031.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-035.000 

33.1 Minimize impacts on 

wetland crossing. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

ALT-B-NY-BR-037.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-039.000 

34.0 Minimize impacts on 

stream BR-1I-S057. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

ALT-B-NY-BR-050.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-051.000 

ALT-B-NY-BR-053.000 

ALT-B-UA-NY-BR-052.000 

36.53 Minimize impacts on 

stream BR-1U-S141. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-CH-004.006 

NY-CH-004.003 

NY-CH-005.002 

43.7 Minimize impacts on 

wetland CH-1H-S016. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-CH-011.000 

NY-CH-012.000 

NY-CH-014.000 

NY-CH-015.000 

45.3 Minimize impacts on 

stream CH-XX-S43.14. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-CH-015.000 

UA-NY-CH-015.001 

NY-CH-016.000 

NY-CH-017.000 

45.8 Minimize impacts on 

wetland CH‐XX‐S43.52. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-009.000 

NY-DE-010.000 

NY-DE-011.000 

NY-DE-010.000 

52.4 Minimize impacts on 

stream DE-1B-S029. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-019.001 

NY-DE-024.000 

NY-DE-025.000 

NY-DE-026.000 

55.7 Minimize impacts on 

stream DE-1F-S078. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-044.000 

NY-DE-045.001 

60.65 Minimize impacts on 

stream DE-1P-S129. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-092.000 

NY-DE-093.000 

69.2 Minimize impacts on 

stream DE-1P-S054. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-149.000 

NY-DE-150.000 

NY-DE-151.000 

NY-DE-153.000 

NY-DE-154.000 

80.2 Minimize impacts on 

wetland DE-1G-S183, 

S183D. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-158.001 

NY-DE-158.002 

81.65 Minimize impacts on 

stream crossing. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-165.004 81.7 Minimize impacts on 

stream DE-1G-S203. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-DE-205.000 88.23 Minimize impacts on 

stream DE-1P-S053. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-SC-006.000 94.3 Minimize impacts on 

stream SC-1F-S002. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

NY-SC-007.002 

NY-SC-009.002 

ALT-F-NY-SC-003.000 

NY-SC-010.001 

94.9 Minimize impacts on 

stream SC-1C-S325, 

S325A, S325B. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

   
APPENDIX H – STATUS OF MINOR ROUTE VARIATIONS 

H4-2

APPENDIX H-4 (continued) 

Status of Minor Route Variations Assessed for Impacts on Water Resources 

Affected Parcel Numbers MP 

Reason for Minor 

Deviation Status 

Agency Resolution 

(Yes/No) 

ALT-F-NY-SC-004.000 

POTENTIAL-ALT-F-004.000 

POTENTIAL-ALT-F-005.000 

ALT-F-NY-SC-004.004 

96.07 Minimize impacts on 

stream SC-1Q-S278. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-022.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-020.000 

ALT-Q-NY-SC-023.000 

120.7 Minimize impacts on 

stream SC-1C-S180. 

Adopted into Proposed 

Route. 

Yes