alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          94,217
<SECURITIES>                                    91,098
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,162
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,245
<INVENTORY>                                     49,030
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               331,252
<PP&E>                                          48,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,122
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,489
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,122
<SALES>                                        208,080
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               208,080
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,820
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,300
<DISCONTINUED>                                  45,376
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    72,676
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.30
        

</TABLE>
Table 21

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary-Subject to Change Central Valley Project - California

Monthly Diversions in AF 2024

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

CANALS

Contra Costa 5749 5277 5571 13527 30124

Delta-Mendota 200131 229888 164350 64766 659135

Actual Fed Dos Amigos 92685 98331 47514 NA 238530

Madera 0 0 0 31720 31720

Friant-Kern 10588 24748 33448 88254 157038

Corning 0 107 545 4431 5083

Folsom-South 377 0 912 1234 2523

Tehama-Colusa 0 212 6686 4651 11549

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel 917 674 1034 870 3495

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek 0 0 0 1577 1577

North Canal 0 0 0 411 411

South Canal 0 0 0 1166 1166

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal 3378 3356 4834 8634 20202

NA = Not Available at time report was produced.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio ZUNIGA-ZUNIGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41722.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 6, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Julio Zuniga-Zuniga appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien present in the United States following a prior deportation for an aggravated felony. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) *&*(b). Zuniga’s waiver-of-appeal provision does not bar this appeal because the record reflects that the magistrate judge who administered Zuniga’s plea erroneously described the waiver-of-appeal provision. *See*Fed. R.CrimP. ll(b)(l)(N).

Zuniga argues that the district court erred in assigning a 16-level increase to his offense level based upon a prior conviction for second degree assault that occurred in Kentucky. This issue is reviewed de novo as Zuniga raised it in the district court. *See United States v. Villegas,*404 F.3d 355, 359 (5th Cir.2005).

The Government concedes that the district court erred in assigning the 16-level increase because the record does not conclusively establish that the prior conviction qualifies as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) (Nov.2004). Accordingly, Zuniga’s sentence is vacated and remanded.

Zuniga also argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in sentencing him using and unconstitutional mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime in violation of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Zuniga’s argument will not be ad*863dressed in light of this court’s remand for resentencing. *See United States v. South*erland, 405 F.3d 263, 270 (5th Cir.2005).

VACATE and REMAND.

CHARLES H. SPURGEON SAID, CARVE YOUR NAME ON HEARTS AND NOT ON MARBLE. YOU HAVE CARVED YOUR NAME UPON OUR HEARTS BY COMING TO SHARE WITH U.S. ON THE DAY OF OUR MARRIAGE.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 173

 171

 212

 226

 232

 241

 241

 255

 278

 312

 346

 356

 372

 365

 326

 316

 294

 310

 309

 297

 283

 287

 297

 295

 285

 276

 274

 254

 256

 259

 165

 164

 171

 213

 227

 229

 236

 237

 251

 278

 313

 346

 356

 311

 311

 282

 268

 292

 290

 277

 275

 276

 278

 278

 266

 263

 249

 246

 250

 251

 168

 167

 193

 219

 230

 236

 238

 244

 261

 294

 324

 352

 366

 328

 318

 293

 283

 299

 298

 289

 278

 282

 286

 284

 276

 267

 259

 249

 254

 257

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 168

 335

 528

 747

 977

 1,213

 1,451

 1,695

 1,956

 2,250

 2,574

 2,926

 3,292

 3,620

 3,938

 4,231

 4,514

 4,813

 5,111

 5,400

 5,678

 5,960

 6,246

 6,530

 6,806

 7,073

 7,332

 7,581

 7,835

 8,092

 168

 168

 176

 187

 195

 202

 207

 212

 217

 225

 234

 244

 253

 259

 263

 264

 266

 267

 269

 270

 270

 271

 272

 272

 272

 272

 272

 271

 270

 270

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.17

 508.15

 508.20

 508.67

 508.64

 509.11

 508.52

 508.51

 508.70

 509.09

 509.09

 509.21

 509.22

 508.89

 508.86

 508.58

 508.55

 509.13

 509.10

 508.79

 508.56

 509.07

 508.82

 509.34

 509.25

 508.74

 508.67

 508.25

 508.23

 508.44

 508.85

 64,698

 64,674

 64,735

 65,314

 65,277

 65,857

 65,129

 65,117

 65,351

 65,832

 65,832

 65,982

 65,995

 65,585

 65,548

 65,203

 65,166

 65,882

 65,845

 65,461

 65,178

 65,807

 65,498

 66,144

 66,032

 65,400

 65,314

 64,797

 64,772

 65,031

 65,535

STORAGE

-665

-24

+61

+579

-37

+580

-728

-12

+234

+481

+0

+150

+13

-410

-37

-345

-37

+716

-37

-384

-283

+629

-309

+646

-112

-632

-86

-517

-25

+259

+504

CHANGE

1,189

1,575

1,564

1,822

1,531

1,852

1,130

1,493

1,589

1,655

1,335

1,472

1,478

1,270

1,366

1,217

1,415

1,877

1,453

1,364

1,439

1,941

1,472

1,865

1,494

1,317

1,614

1,498

1,767

1,850

1,980

INFLOW

 1,504

 1,566

 1,520

 1,512

 1,534

 1,544

 1,480

 1,477

 1,453

 1,396

 1,321

 1,380

 1,456

 1,459

 1,367

 1,370

 1,417

 1,498

 1,455

 1,545

 1,566

 1,608

 1,610

 1,520

 1,529

 1,618

 1,636

 1,740

 1,762

 1,700

 1,707

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 20

 21

 13

 18

 16

 16

 17

 22

 18

 16

 14

 16

 15

 18

 18

 21

 17

 18

 17

 13

 16

 16

 18

 19

 21

 18

 21

 19

 18

 19

 19

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/01/2016

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +172 47,884 47,250 0 0 548

ACRE-FEET +172 94,978 93,720 0 0 1,087

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 93,720

SPILL 0 93,720

 65,363

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,190

 1,570

 1,559

 1,824

 1,519

 1,842

 1,149

 1,480

 1,571

 1,656

 1,329

 1,458

 1,478

 1,258

 1,391

 1,214

 1,420

 1,862

 1,441

 1,389

 1,429

 1,930

 1,470

 1,854

 1,488

 1,324

 1,605

 1,528

 1,750

 1,843

 1,978

 47,799

 94,809

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
#### § 703.306 Kinds of negotiable securities that may be deposited; conditions of deposit; acceptance of deposits.

A self-insurer or a self-insurer applicant electing to deposit negotiable securities to secure its obligations under the Act in the amount fixed by the Office under the regulations in this part shall deposit any negotiable securities acceptable as security for the deposit of public monies of the United States under regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury. (*See* 31 CFR part 225.) The approval, valuation, acceptance, and custody of such securities is hereby committed to the several Federal Reserve Banks and the Treasurer of the United States.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6116
ROBERT LEE BROCK, a/k/a Two Souls Walker, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-1194-2) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: May 21, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion. Both orders are properly before the court. Dove v. CODESCO , 569 F.2d 807, 810 (4th Cir. 1978). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district co urt. Brock v. Angelone , No. CA-95-1194-2 (E.D. Va.Dec. 28, 1995; Jan. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.80

 508.36

 508.04

 506.91

 506.82

 506.18

 505.08

 504.42

 503.51

 502.85

 502.34

 501.57

 500.74

 499.30

 499.22

 497.74

 497.01

 496.78

 497.31

 496.60

 497.05

 496.58

 495.35

 494.42

 494.43

 494.95

 495.21

 495.18

 494.87

 494.53

 493.88

 65,474

 64,932

 64,538

 63,170

 63,062

 62,298

 61,001

 60,236

 59,191

 58,442

 57,871

 57,016

 56,105

 54,556

 54,471

 52,916

 52,159

 51,925

 52,470

 51,741

 52,201

 51,721

 50,476

 49,551

 49,561

 50,075

 50,335

 50,305

 49,996

 49,660

 49,019

STORAGE

+74

-542

-394

-1,368

-108

-764

-1,297

-765

-1,045

-749

-571

-855

-911

-1,549

-85

-1,555

-757

-234

+545

-729

+460

-480

-1,245

-925

+10

+514

+260

-30

-309

-336

-641

CHANGE

842

590

632

135

691

337

19

221

36

204

344

258

304

243

1,194

1,018

1,243

1,176

1,046

321

1,030

837

1,060

1,161

1,280

919

522

1,225

1,058

843

450

INFLOW

 792

 849

 817

 813

 717

 707

 661

 598

 554

 575

 626

 689

 759

 1,014

 1,227

 1,794

 1,616

 1,276

 761

 679

 790

 1,071

 1,681

 1,621

 1,270

 653

 385

 1,234

 1,207

 1,005

 765

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 13

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 13

 14

 14

 12

 15

 15

 12

 9

 9

 7

 6

 0

 4

 10

 10

 8

 9

 18

 10

 10

 8

 8

 7

 6

 5

 7

 6

 6

 7

 7

 8

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/01/2020

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -16,381 21,239 29,206 0 13 280

ACRE-FEET -16,381 42,128 57,930 0 26 555

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 57,930

SPILL 0 57,956

 65,400

OUTLET 26

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 841

 607

 635

 153

 689

 348

 36

 223

 52

 211

 351

 273

 323

 258

 1,186

 1,033

 1,258

 1,181

 1,069

 329

 1,030

 849

 1,078

 1,176

 1,294

 931

 556

 1,235

 1,083

 864

 462

 21,614

 42,871

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.
#### § 10010.14 Time limits.

When time limits are established to prepare an environmental document they should reflect the availability of personnel and funds.
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 17.312 Burden of proof.

The burden of proving that an age distinction or other action falls within the exceptions outlined in §§ 17.311(b) and 17.311(c), is on the recipient of Federal financial assistance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 334

 335

 327

 313

 320

 321

 324

 310

 276

 258

 242

 150

 145

 138

 139

 137

 144

 147

 138

 139

 139

 139

 139

 138

 127

 123

 132

 138

 139

 148

 327

 328

 313

 308

 314

 317

 313

 279

 251

 243

 150

 142

 136

 134

 131

 132

 134

 135

 132

 132

 133

 130

 135

 124

 116

 116

 123

 128

 134

 138

 330

 332

 321

 310

 318

 319

 321

 293

 262

 251

 208

 146

 141

 136

 135

 135

 137

 141

 135

 137

 136

 134

 137

 130

 120

 118

 128

 133

 136

 141

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 2866.31 How will the BLM calculate rent for Communications Uses in the schedule? ( a ) *Basic rule.* The BLM calculates rents for: ( 1 ) Single-use facilities by applying the rent from the communications uses rent schedule (see § 2866.30) for the type of use and the population strata served; and
( 2 ) Multiple-use facilities, whose authorizations provide for subleasing, by setting the rent of the highest value use in the facility or facilities as the base rent (taken from the rent schedule) and adding to the base rent 25 percent of the rent from the rent schedule for all tenant uses in the facility or facilities that are not already being used as the base rent (rent = base rent + 25 percent of all rent due to additional tenant uses in the facility or facilities) (see also §§ 2866.32 and 2866.34).
( b ) *Exclusions.* When calculating rent, the BLM will exclude customer uses, except as provided for at §§ 2866.34(b)(4) and 2866.42. The BLM will also exclude those uses exempted from rent by § 2866.14 of this subpart, and any uses for which rent has been waived or reduced to zero as described in § 2866.15.
( c ) *Annual statement.* By October 15 of each year, you, as a grant holder, must submit to the BLM a certified statement listing any tenants and customers in your facility or facilities and the category of use for each tenant or customer as of September 30 of the same year. The BLM may require you to submit additional information to calculate your rent. The BLM will determine the rent based on the annual inventory certification statement provided. The BLM requires only facility owners or facility managers to hold a grant (unless you are an occupant in a federally owned facility as described in § 2866.42) and will charge you rent for your grant based on the total number of communications uses within the right-of-way and the type of uses and population strata the facility or site serves. If you fail to submit your annual inventory certification by October 15 (by electronic correspondence or postmarked), you may not receive any discounts, reductions, exemptions, or waivers (see §§ 2866.14, 2866.15, and 2866.34), to which you may have been entitled.
Express 

August 21,2015 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

l.ega' Department 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

B,;ilding B. 3rd F-loor 

Memphis, TN 38125 US 

~.lJG 2 4 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

RE: Request for Formal Hearing- FAA Case Number: 201SNM720020 

Dear Sir: 

In response to the Final Notice of Proposed Civil Penalty that was issued in FAA case number 

2015NM720020 and received by my office on August 11, 2015, Federal Express, in accordance 

with 14 CPR 13 .16(g)(2)(ii), respectfully requests a hearing in this matter. 

A copy of this request is being sent to David F. Shayne, Federal Aviation Administration, Office 

of the Chief Counsel, Enforcement Division, Western Team, 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, 

WA98057. 

All correspondence regarding this matter should be sent to my attention at 1700 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, N.W., Suite 950, Washington, DC 20006. 

If there are any questions, please call me at (202) 393-9285 or email greg.stofko@fedex.com. 

Sincerely, 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

Greg G. Stofko 

Senior Attorney 

Regulatory Affairs 

Office: (202) 393-9285 

greg.stofko@fedex.com 

cc: David F. Shayne
§ 2623.3 States not permitted to dispose of lands except with reservation of minerals. ( a ) Subsection (b) of section 1 of the Act of January 25, 1927, provides: That the additional grant made by this Act is upon the express condition that all sales, grants, deeds, or patents for any of the lands so granted shall be subject to and contain a reservation to the State of all the coal and other minerals in the lands so sold, granted, deeded, or patented, together with the right to prospect for, mine, and remove the same. The coal and other mineral deposits in such lands shall be subject to lease by the State as the State legislature may direct, the proceeds of rentals and royalties therefrom to be utilized for the support or in aid of the common or public schools: *Provided,* That any lands or minerals disposed of contrary to the provisions of this Act shall be forfeited to the United States by appropriate proceedings instituted by the Attorney General for that purpose in the United States district court for the district in which the property or some part thereof is located.
( b ) The lands granted to the States by the Act of January 25, 1927, and the mineral deposits therein are to be disposed of by the States in the manner prescribed in subsection (b) thereof, provision being made for judicial forfeiture in case of disposal of any of the lands or minerals contrary to the provisions of the act.
### §352a. Cancellation of patents in fee simple for allotments held in trust

The Secretary of the Interior is authorized, in his discretion, to cancel any patent in fee simple issued to an Indian allottee or to his heirs before the end of the period of trust described in the original or trust patent issued to such allottee, or before the expiration of any extension of such period of trust by the President, where such patent in fee simple was issued without the consent or an application therefor by the allottee or by his heirs: Provided, That the patentee has not mortgaged or sold any part of the land described in such patent: Provided also, That upon cancellation of such patent in fee simple the land shall have the same status as though such fee patent had never been issued.

(Feb. 26, 1927, ch. 215, §1, 44 Stat. 1247.)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen J. Bacica, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Stephen J. BacicaName:

Stephen J. BacicaTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 6, 2009
#### § 2650.0-8 Waiver.

The Secretary may, in his discretion, waive any nonstatutory requirement of these regulations. When the rights of third parties will not be impaired, and when rapid, certain settlement of the claims of Natives will be assisted, minor procedural and technical errors should be waived.
#### Joseph Seidl, Respondent, v. Ann H. Seidl, Appellant.

Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### § 2911.2-1 Preapplication activity.

Persons seeking to lease public lands under this subpart shall first consult with the authorized officer in the District or Resource Area Office in which the lands are located. Such consultation is necessary to determine land availability and conformity of proposed use with approved land use plans, explain associated statutory and regulatory requirements, familiarize the potential applicant with respective management responsibilities, set forth the application processing procedures for the proposed action, and identify potential conflicts. Upon completion of the consultation, persons seeking to lease public lands for a public airport may submit an application for consideration by the authorized officer.