Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules 17363 

hearing, but DOE will conduct it in 

accordance with section 336 of EPCA. 

(42 U.S.C. 6306) A court reporter will be 

present to record the proceedings and 

prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the 

right to schedule the order of 

presentations and to establish the 

procedures governing the conduct of the 

public meeting. After the public 

meeting, interested parties may submit 

further comments on the proceedings as 

well as on any aspect of the rulemaking 

until the end of the comment period. 

The public meeting will be conducted 

in an informal, conference style. DOE 

will present summaries of comments 

received before the public meeting, 

allow time for prepared general 

statements by participants, and 

encourage all interested parties to share 

their views on issues affecting this 

rulemaking. Each participant will be 

allowed to make a general statement 

(within time limits determined by DOE), 

before the discussion of specific topics. 

DOE will allow, as time permits, other 

participants to comment briefly on any 

general statements. 

VI. Approval of the Office of the 

Secretary 

The Secretary of Energy has approved 

publication of today’s notice of 

proposed rulemaking. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 26, 

2015. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07470 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

10 CFR Part 431 

[EERE–2013–BT–STD–0007; EERE–2013– 

BT–STD–0021] 

Appliance Standards and Rulemaking 

Federal Advisory Committee: Notice of 

Intent To Establish the Commercial 

Package Air Conditioners and Heat 

Pumps and Commercial Warm Air 

Furnaces Working Group To Negotiate 

Potential Energy Conservation 

Standards 

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of 

Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of intent and 

announcement of a public meeting. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE or the Department) is 

giving notice that it intends to establish 

a negotiated rulemaking working group 

under the Appliance Standards and 

Rulemaking Federal Advisory 

Committee (ASRAC) in accordance with 

the Federal Advisory Committee Act 

(FACA) and the Negotiated Rulemaking 

Act (NRA) to negotiate regarding energy 

conservation standards for small, large, 

and very large, air-cooled commercial 

package air conditioners and heat 

pumps as well as commercial warm air 

furnaces. The purpose of the working 

group will be to discuss and, if possible, 

reach consensus regarding the 

development of energy conservation 

standards for small, large, and very 

large, air-cooled commercial package air 

conditioners and heat pumps as well as 

commercial warm air furnaces, as 

authorized by the Energy Policy and 

Conservation Act (EPCA) of 1975, as 

amended. The working group will 

consist of representatives of parties 

having a defined stake in the outcome 

of the energy conservation standards, 

and will consult as appropriate with a 

range of experts on technical issues. 

The working group is expected to 

negotiate a final term sheet regarding 

energy conservation standards for the 

aforementioned equipment by Monday, 

June 15, 2015. The final term sheet will 

be presented to ASRAC at an open 

meeting for their deliberation and 

decision on whether to pass it on as a 

formal recommendation to DOE. 

DATES: Written comments and request to 

be appointed as members of the CUAC 

and CWAF Working Group, including 

an application package, are welcome 

and should be submitted by April 15, 

2015. 

DOE will hold the first meeting for the 

CUAC and CWAF Working Group on 

Tuesday, April, 28, 2015, from 9 a.m. to 

5 p.m., in Washington, DC. The meeting 

will also be broadcast as a webinar. See 

section V Public Participation for 

webinar registration information, 

participant instructions, and 

information about the capabilities 

available to webinar participants. 

ADDRESSES: The first CUAC and CWAF 

Working Group meeting, which is also 

open to the public, will be held at the 

U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal 

Building, Room 8E–089, 1000 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585. To attend, 

please notify asrac@ee.doe.gov. Please 

note that foreign nationals participating 

in the public meeting are subject to 

advance security screening procedures 

which require advance notice prior to 

attendance at the public meeting. If a 

foreign national wishes to participate in 

the public meeting, please inform DOE 

as soon as possible by contacting 

regina.washington@ee.doe.gov so that 

the necessary procedures can be 

completed. Please also note that those 

wishing to bring laptops into the 

Forrestal Building will be required to 

obtain a property pass. Visitors should 

avoid bringing laptops, or allow an extra 

45 minutes. Persons can attend the 

public meeting via webinar. For more 

information, refer to section V of this 

document (Public Participation). 

Interested person may submit 

comments, identified by docket number 

EERE–2013–BT–STD–0007; EERE– 

2013–BT–STD–0021 by any of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

2. Email: ASRAC@ee.doe.gov. Include 

docket number EERE–2013–BT–STD– 

0007; EERE–2013–BT–STD–0021 in the 

subject line of the message. 

3. Mail: Ms. Brenda Edwards, U.S. 

Department of Energy, Building 

Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B, 

1000 Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20585–0121. If 

possible, please submit all items on a 

compact disc (CD), in which case it is 

not necessary to include printed copies. 

4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Ms. Brenda 

Edwards, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Building Technologies Program, 950 

L’Enfant Plaza SW., Suite 600, 

Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: 

(202) 586–2945. If possible, please 

submit all items on a CD, in which case 

it is not necessary to include printed 

copies. 

No telefacsimilies (faxes) will be 

accepted. 

Docket: The docket is available for 

review at www.regulations.gov, 

including Federal Register notices, 

public meeting attendee lists and 

transcripts, comments, and other 

supporting documents/materials. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov index. 

However, not all documents listed in 

the index may be publicly available, 

such as information that is exempt from 

public disclosure. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Cymbalsky, U.S. Department of Energy, 

Office of Building Technologies (EE–2J), 

950 L’Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, 

DC 20024. Phone: 202–287–1692. Email: 

asrac@ee.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Preamble 

I. Authority 

II. Background 

III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures 

IV. Comments Requested 

V. Public Participation 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

17364 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

I. Authority 

This notice of intent, announcing 

DOE’s intent to negotiate regarding 

energy conservation standards for small 

(greater than or equal to 65,000 Btu/h 

and under 135,000 Btu/h cooling 

capacity), large, (greater than or equal to 

135,000 Btu/h and under 240,000 Btu/ 

h cooling capacity) and very large 

(greater than or equal to 240,000 Btu/h 

and under 760,000 Btu/h cooling 

capacity), air-cooled commercial 

package air conditioners and heat 

pumps (CUACs) as well as commercial 

warm air furnaces (CWAFs), was 

developed under the authority of 

sections 563 and 564 of the NRA (5 

U.S.C. 561–570, Pub. L. 104–320). The 

establishment of energy conservation 

standards for CUACs and CWAFs by 

DOE is pursuant to authority in EPCA, 

as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6311(1)(A) and 

42 U.S.C. 6291, et seq. 

II. Background 

As required by the NRA, DOE is 

giving notice that it is establishing a 

working group under ASRAC to 

negotiate regarding energy conservation 

standards CUACs and CWAFs. EPCA, as 

amended, directs DOE to adopt energy 

conservation standards for CUACs and 

CWAFs for which standards would be 

technologically feasible and 

economically justified, and would result 

in significant energy savings. The 

current Federal for CUACs are found in 

10 CFR part 431.97(b). 

A. Negotiated Rulemaking 

DOE has decided to use the negotiated 

rulemaking process to discuss the 

development of energy conservation 

standards for CUACs and CWAFs. 

Under EPCA, Congress mandated that 

DOE develop regulations establishing 

energy conservation standards for 

covered consumer and commercial 

products that are designed to achieve 

the maximum improvement in energy 

efficiency that are technologically 

feasible and economically justified. 42 

U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A). The primary 

reason for using the negotiated 

rulemaking process for considering 

amended energy conservation standards 

is that stakeholders strongly support a 

consensual rulemaking effort. DOE 

believes such a regulatory negotiation 

process will be less adversarial and 

better suited to resolving complex 

technical issues. An important virtue of 

negotiated rulemaking is that it allows 

expert dialog that is much better than 

traditional techniques at getting the 

facts and issues right and will result in 

a rulemaking that will effectively reflect 

Congressional intent. 

A regulatory negotiation will enable 

DOE to engage in direct and sustained 

dialog with informed, interested, and 

affected parties when considering 

potential revisions to the publically 

available analysis. Because a negotiating 

working group includes representatives 

from the major stakeholder groups 

affected by or interested in the rule, the 

number of changes in the analysis 

resulting from responses to public 

comments on the proposed rule may be 

decreased as DOE and the major 

stakeholder groups affected by the rule 

have the opportunity to have a 

discussions about the data, 

methodology, and analyses. 

B. Rulemaking for CUAC and CWAF 

Energy Conservation Standards 

The NRA enables DOE to establish an 

advisory committee or working group if 

it is determined that the use of the 

negotiated rulemaking process is in the 

public interest. DOE intends to develop 

Federal regulations that build on the 

depth of experience accrued in both the 

public and private sectors in 

implementing standards and programs. 

DOE has determined that the 

regulatory negotiation process will 

provide for obtaining a diverse array of 

in-depth input, as well as an 

opportunity for increased collaborative 

discussion from both private-sector 

stakeholders and government officials 

who are familiar with energy use and 

efficiency of CUACs and CWAFs. 

D. Department Commitment 

In initiating this regulatory 

negotiation process regarding energy 

conservation standards for CUACs and 

CWAFs, DOE is making a commitment 

to provide adequate resources to 

facilitate timely and successful 

completion of the process. This 

commitment includes making the 

process a priority activity for all 

representatives, components, officials, 

and personnel of the Department who 

need to be involved in the rulemaking, 

from the time of initiation until such 

time as a final rule is issued or the 

process is expressly terminated. DOE 

will provide administrative support for 

the process and will take steps to ensure 

that the advisory committee or working 

group has the dedicated resources it 

requires to complete its work in a timely 

fashion. Specifically, DOE will make 

available the following support services: 

properly equipped space adequate for 

public meetings and caucuses; logistical 

support; word processing and 

distribution of background information; 

the service of a facilitator; and such 

additional research and other technical 

assistance as may be necessary. 

To the maximum extent possible 

consistent with the legal obligations of 

the Department, DOE will consider the 

consensus of the advisory committee or 

working group as the basis for the 

rulemaking moving forward. 

E. Negotiating Consensus 

As discussed above, the negotiated 

rulemaking process differs 

fundamentally from the usual process 

for developing and revising a typical 

rulemaking. Negotiation enables 

interested and affected parties to discuss 

various approaches to issues rather than 

asking them only to respond to a 

proposal developed by the Department. 

The negotiation process involves a 

mutual education of the various parties 

on the practical concerns about the 

impact of standards. Each advisory 

committee or working group member 

participates in resolving the interests 

and concerns of other members, rather 

than leaving it up to DOE to evaluate 

and incorporate different points of view. 

A key principle of negotiated 

rulemaking is that agreement is by 

consensus of all the interests. Thus, no 

one interest or group of interests is able 

to control the process. The NRA defines 

consensus as the unanimous 

concurrence among interests 

represented on a negotiated rulemaking 

committee or working group, unless the 

committee or working group itself 

unanimously agrees to use a different 

definition. 5 U.S.C. 562. In addition, 

experience has demonstrated that using 

a trained mediator to facilitate this 

process will assist all parties, including 

DOE, in identifying their real interests 

in the rule, and thus will enable parties 

to focus on and resolve the important 

issues. 

III. Proposed Negotiating Procedures 

A. Key Issues for Negotiation 

The following issues and concerns 

will underlie the work of the Negotiated 

Rulemaking Committee on CUAC and 

CWAF Energy Conservation Standards: 

• Additional data that could be 

considered by the Working Group in 

potentially revising the analytical tools 

that DOE used for the proposed rules; 

• Additional methodology 

assumptions that could be considered 

by the Working Group in potentially 

revising the analytical tools that DOE 

used for the proposed rules; 

• Synergies gained by combining the 

rulemaking and potential compliance 

dates for two covered products; and 

• Consideration of energy 

conservation standards. 

To examine the underlying issues 

outlined above, and others not yet 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules 17365 

articulated, all parties in the negotiation 

will need DOE to provide data and an 

analytic framework complete and 

accurate enough to support their 

deliberations. DOE’s analyses must be 

adequate to inform a prospective 

negotiation—for example, the notice of 

proposed rulemakings for CUACs and 

CWAFs or equivalent must be available 

and timely. 

B. Formation of Working Group 

A working group will be formed and 

operated in full compliance with the 

requirements of FACA and in a manner 

consistent with the requirements of the 

NRA. DOE has determined that the 

working group shall not exceed 25 

members. The Department believes that 

more than 25 members would make it 

difficult to conduct effective 

negotiations. DOE is aware that there are 

many more potential participants than 

there are membership slots on the 

working group. The Department does 

not believe, nor does the NRA 

contemplate, that each potentially 

affected group must participate directly 

in the negotiations; nevertheless, each 

affected interest can be adequately 

represented. To have a successful 

negotiation, it is important for interested 

parties to identify and form coalitions 

that adequately represent significantly 

affected interests. To provide adequate 

representation, those coalitions must 

agree to support, both financially and 

technically, a member of the working 

group whom they choose to represent 

their interests. 

DOE recognizes that when it 

establishes energy conservation 

standards for consumer products and 

commercial equipment, various 

segments of society may be affected in 

different ways, in some cases producing 

unique ‘‘interests’’ in a rulemaking 

based on income, gender, or other 

factors. The Department will pay 

attention to providing that any unique 

interests that have been identified, and 

that may be significantly affected by the 

rulemaking, are represented. 

FACA also requires that members of 

the public have the opportunity to 

attend meetings of the full committee 

and speak or otherwise address the 

committee during the public comment 

period. In addition, any member of the 

public is permitted to file a written 

statement with the advisory committee. 

DOE plans to follow these same 

procedures in conducting meetings of 

the working group. 

C. Interests Involved/Working Group 

Membership 

DOE anticipates that the working 

group will comprise no more than 25 

members who represent affected and 

interested stakeholder groups, at least 

one of whom must be a member of the 

ASRAC. As required by FACA, the 

Department will conduct the negotiated 

rulemaking with particular attention to 

ensuring full and balanced 

representation of those interests that 

may be significantly affected by the 

rulemaking for energy conservation 

standards regarding CUACs and 

CWAFs. Section 562 of the NRA defines 

the term interest as ‘‘with respect to an 

issue or matter, multiple parties which 

have a similar point of view or which 

are likely to be affected in a similar 

manner.’’ Listed below are parties the 

Department to date has identified as 

being ‘‘significantly affected’’ by a 

rulemaking regarding the energy 

conservation standards regarding 

CUACs and CWAFs. 

• The U.S. Department of Energy 

• Trade Associations representing 

manufacturers of CUACs and CWAF; 

• Utilities 

• Energy Efficiency/Environmental 

Advocacy Groups 

• Consumers 

One purpose of this notice of intent is 

to determine whether Federal 

regulations regarding CUACs and 

CWAFs energy conservation standards 

will significantly affect interests that are 

not listed above. DOE invites comment 

and suggestions on its initial list of 

significantly affected interests. 

Members may be individuals or 

organizations. If the effort is to be 

fruitful, participants on the working 

group should be able to fully and 

adequately represent the viewpoints of 

their respective interests. This 

document gives notice of DOE’s process 

to other potential participants and 

affords them the opportunity to request 

representation in the negotiations. 

Those who wish to be appointed as 

members of the CUACs and CWAFs 

Working Group, should submit a request 

to DOE, in accordance with the public 

participation procedures outlined in the 

DATES and ADDRESSES sections of this 

notice of intent. Membership of the 

working group is likely to involve: 

• Attendance at approximately six, 

one (1) to two (2) day meetings; 

• Travel costs to those meetings; and 

• Preparation time for those meetings. 

Members serving on the working 

group will not receive compensation for 

their services. Interested parties who are 

not selected for membership on the 

working group may make valuable 

contributions to this negotiated 

rulemaking effort in any of the following 

ways: 

• The person may request to be 

placed on the working group mailing 

list and submit written comments as 

appropriate. 

• The person may attend working 

group meetings, which are open to the 

public; caucus with his or her interest’s 

member on the working group; or even 

address the working group during the 

public comment portion of the working 

group meeting. 

• The person could assist the efforts 

of a workgroup that the working group 

might establish. 

A working group may establish 

informal workgroups, which usually are 

asked to facilitate committee 

deliberations by assisting with various 

technical matters (e.g., researching or 

preparing summaries of the technical 

literature or comments on specific 

matters such as economic issues). 

Workgroups also might assist in 

estimating costs or drafting regulatory 

text on issues associated with the 

analysis of the costs and benefits 

addressed, or formulating drafts of the 

various provisions and their 

justifications as previously developed 

by the working group. Given their 

support function, workgroups usually 

consist of participants who have 

expertise or particular interest in the 

technical matter(s) being studied. 

Because it recognizes the importance of 

this support work for the working 

group, DOE will provide appropriate 

technical expertise for such workgroups. 

D. Good Faith Negotiation 

Every working group member must be 

willing to negotiate in good faith and 

have the authority, granted by his or her 

constituency, to do so. The first step is 

to ensure that each member has good 

communications with his or her 

constituencies. An intra-interest 

network of communication should be 

established to bring information from 

the support organization to the member 

at the table, and to take information 

from the table back to the support 

organization. Second, each organization 

or coalition should designate as its 

representative a person having the 

credibility and authority to ensure that 

needed information is provided and 

decisions are made in a timely fashion. 

Negotiated rulemaking can require the 

appointed members to give a significant 

sustained time commitment for as long 

as the duration of the negotiated 

rulemaking. Other qualities of members 

that can be helpful are negotiating 

experience and skills, and sufficient 

technical knowledge to participate in 

substantive negotiations. 

Certain concepts are central to 

negotiating in good faith. One is the 

willingness to bring all issues to the 

bargaining table in an attempt to reach 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

17366 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 62 / Wednesday, April 1, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

a consensus, as opposed to keeping key 

issues in reserve. The second is a 

willingness to keep the issues at the 

table and not take them to other forums. 

Finally, good faith includes a 

willingness to move away from some of 

the positions often taken in a more 

traditional rulemaking process, and 

instead explore openly with other 

parties all ideas that may emerge from 

the working group’s discussions. 

E. Facilitator 

The facilitator will act as a neutral in 

the substantive development of the 

proposed standard. Rather, the 

facilitator’s role generally includes: 

• Impartially assisting the members of 

the working group in conducting 

discussions and negotiations; and 

• Impartially assisting in performing 

the duties of the Designated Federal 

Official under FACA. 

F. Department Representative 

The DOE representative will be a full 

and active participant in the consensus 

building negotiations. The Department’s 

representative will meet regularly with 

senior Department officials, briefing 

them on the negotiations and receiving 

their suggestions and advice so that he 

or she can effectively represent the 

Department’s views regarding the issues 

before the working group. DOE’s 

representative also will ensure that the 

entire spectrum of governmental 

interests affected by the standards 

rulemaking, including the Office of 

Management and Budget, the Attorney 

General, and other Departmental offices, 

are kept informed of the negotiations 

and encouraged to make their concerns 

known in a timely fashion. 

G. Working Group and Schedule 

After evaluating the comments 

submitted in response to this notice of 

intent and the requests for nominations, 

DOE will either inform the members of 

the working group that they have been 

selected or determine that conducting a 

negotiated rulemaking is inappropriate. 

The working group is expected to 

negotiate a final term sheet by Monday, 

June 15, 2015. The final term sheet will 

be presented to ASRAC at an open 

meeting for their deliberation and 

decision on whether or not to pass it on 

as a formal recommendation to DOE. 

DOE will advise working group 

members of administrative matters 

related to the functions of the working 

group before beginning. DOE will 

establish a meeting schedule based on 

the settlement agreement and produce 

the necessary documents so as to adhere 

to that schedule. While the negotiated 

rulemaking process is underway, DOE is 

committed to performing much of the 

same analysis as it would during a 

normal standards rulemaking process 

and to providing information and 

technical support to the working group. 

IV. Comments Requested 

DOE requests comments on which 

parties should be included in a 

negotiated rulemaking to consider 

energy conservation standards for 

CUACs and CWAFs and suggestions of 

additional interests and/or stakeholders 

that should be represented on the 

working group. All who wish to 

participate as members of the working 

group should submit a request for 

nomination to DOE. 

V. Public Participation 

Attendance at the Public Meeting 

The time, date, and location of the 

public meeting are listed in the DATES

and ADDRESSES sections. If you plan to 

attend the public meeting, please notify 

asrac@ee.doe.gov. 

In addition, you can attend the public 

meeting via webinar. Webinar 

registration information, participant 

instructions, and information about the 

capabilities available to webinar 

participants will be published on DOE’s 

Web site at: http://www1.eere.energy.

gov/buildings/appliance_standards/

rulemaking.aspx?ruleid=106. 

Participants are responsible for ensuring 

their systems are compatible with the 

webinar software. 

Conduct of the Public Meeting 

DOE will designate a DOE official to 

preside at the public meeting and may 

also use a professional facilitator to aid 

discussion. The meeting will not be a 

judicial or evidentiary-type public 

hearing, but DOE will conduct it in 

accordance with section 336 of EPCA. 

(42 U.S.C. 6306) A court reporter will be 

present to record the proceedings and 

prepare a transcript. DOE reserves the 

right to schedule the order of 

presentations and to establish the 

procedures governing the conduct of the 

public meeting. After the public 

meeting, interested parties may submit 

further comments on the proceedings as 

well as on any aspect of the rulemaking 

until the end of the comment period. 

The public meeting will be conducted 

in an informal, conference style. DOE 

will present summaries of comments 

received before the public meeting, 

allow time for prepared general 

statements by participants, and 

encourage all interested parties to share 

their views on issues affecting this 

rulemaking. Each participant will be 

allowed to make a general statement 

(within time limits determined by DOE), 

before the discussion of specific topics. 

DOE will allow, as time permits, other 

participants to comment briefly on any 

general statements. 

VI. Approval of the Office of the 

Secretary 

The Secretary of Energy has approved 

publication of this notice of intent. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on March 24, 

2015. 

Kathleen B. Hogan, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy 

Efficiency and Renewable Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07377 Filed 3–31–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–0680; Directorate 

Identifier 2014–NM–165–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, 

Inc. Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC–8–400, 

–401, and –402 airplanes. This proposed 

AD was prompted by a report of a main 

landing gear (MLG) parking brake 

becoming dislodged from its mounting 

bracket due to an improperly installed 

quick release pin of the hand pump 

lever. This proposed AD would require 

removing the hand pump lever of the 

parking brake from the right-hand side 

nacelle. We are proposing this AD to 

prevent an unsecured lever from 

migrating from its stowed position, 

fouling against the MLG, and 

subsequently puncturing the nacelle 

structure, which could adversely affect 

the safe landing of the airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by May 18, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS