alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### AeroUAVs, LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail, Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202 March 24
, 2 0 1 6

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 12153 A , Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1641 under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations.

Dear Sir or Madam:
Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 C.F.R. Par t 11, AeroUAVs, LLC (AeroUAVs), seeks to amend exemption No. 12153 A , Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1641; Submitted by AeroUAVs for review April 20, 2015 and subsequently granted by the FAA on July 27, 2015.
The original exemption made a request to allow operations of 12 different Airframe models for:

 Aerial Photography and Videography for the real estate, construction, and utilities industries

 Agricultural Surveying and Application

 sUAS Operator Training

 Product Demonstrations

 Research and Development There have been no changes in the request for exemption from specific regulations or conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.
This letter requests the addition of additional Air frame models for commercial use in the aforementioned service operations. We are petitioning for exemption to enable AeroUAVs to operate any UAS that has previously been approved by the Secretary of Transportation under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012. UAS that have been previously approved by the Secretary, including the aircraft proposed, are found on the List of Approved Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) under Section 333. The list, which is updated monthly, is posted at www.reg ulations.gov under docket number FAA

– 2007

– 3330.

All those s UAS all weigh less than 55 lbs, have a built

- in capability to limit the height flown above the ground, to limit the radius of the distance it flies from the operator and to exclude it from Class B , C and D airspace including a no fly zone feature. Each system also has the failsafe function of the autopilot system, which means when the communication between the Main Controller and the transmitter is lost, the system will automatically trigger Return to Home and will land safely.

### AeroUAVs, LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail, Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

This submission does not include the Operating Manuals for models requested , as they have been reviewed by the Administrator in granting previous exemptions. Copies of all Operating Manuals for the individual models listed will be submitted on request.
Regards,

Timothy Ford AeroUAVs 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202 (314) 397

- 1110
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 238

 236

 240

 239

 240

 238

 246

 246

 249

 252

 257

 274

 278

 284

 268

 264

 253

 260

 257

 238

 243

 254

 262

 271

 272

 265

 269

 262

 260

 254

 251

 209

 207

 210

 209

 211

 214

 220

 222

 234

 240

 243

 244

 232

 231

 234

 228

 226

 218

 215

 216

 223

 224

 226

 245

 245

 233

 231

 240

 235

 231

 224

 230

 229

 226

 228

 229

 232

 235

 236

 243

 246

 251

 260

 263

 267

 259

 249

 242

 240

 238

 225

 232

 238

 247

 261

 262

 248

 246

 251

 250

 244

 236

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 12, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4617 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require 

that the Buy American purchase requirement for the school lunch program include fish harvested within United States waters, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2016 

Ms. DELBENE (for herself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. 

HERRERA BEUTLER, Mr. HECK of Washington, Mr. KILMER, Mr. SMITH

of Washington, and Mr. LARSEN of Washington) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch 

Act to require that the Buy American purchase requirement for the school lunch program include fish harvested 

within United States waters, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DOMESTIC FISH REQUIRED FOR NATIONAL 

4 SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM. 

5 Section 12(n)(1) of the Richard B. Russell National 

6 School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1760(n)(1)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4617 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

4 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) when used in the context of a fish or 

7 fish product, a fish or fish product that sub8 stantially contains— 

9 ‘‘(i) fish (including tuna) harvested 

10 within— 

11 ‘‘(I) a State; 

12 ‘‘(II) the District of Columbia; or 

13 ‘‘(III) the Exclusive Economic 

14 Zone of the United States, as de15 scribed in Presidential Proclamation 

16 5030 (48 Fed. Reg. 10605; March 10, 

17 1983); or 

18 ‘‘(ii) tuna harvested by a United 

19 States flagged vessel.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT NOVEMBER 30, 1995 (UNAUDITED), THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AT NOVEMBER 30, 1995 (UNAUDITED), AND THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW AT NOVEMBER 30, 1995 (UNAUDITED)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                           5,505
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     15,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,771
<PP&E>                                         111,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,606
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,372
<SALES>                                         45,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,624
<CGS>                                           33,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,547
<INCOME-TAX>                                       799
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,748
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,748
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
#### § 2541.1 Who may apply.

Any individual, group, or corporation authorized to hold title to land in the State and who believes he has a valid claim under color of title may make application.
#### § 3178.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to address the circumstances under which oil or gas produced from Federal and Indian leases may be used royalty-free in operations on the lease, unit, or communitized area. This subpart supersedes those portions of Notice to Lessees and Operators of Onshore Federal and Indian Oil and Gas Leases, Royalty or Compensation for Oil or Gas Lost (NTL-4A), pertaining to oil or gas used for beneficial purposes.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with thequarterly report of Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bruce G. Crain,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | May 12, 2008                        |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                                     |
|   | /s/ Bruce G. Crain                       |
|   |                                     |
|   | Bruce G. Crain                           |
|   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Russ Berrieand Company, Inc. and will be retained by Russ Berrie and Company, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
CVPCP FY18 Projects

Project Proposed Activity Funding

Coyote Ridge Grazing 

Program for Serpentine 

Species

Santa Clara Valley Open 

Space Authority

Habitat restoration across 4,160 acres 

on Coyote Ridge to benefit serpentinedependent and aquatic species through 

enhancement of wetland and riparian 

habitats, and improvement of 

connectivity, via implementation of a 

grazing management plan. Species to 

benefit include California red-legged 

frog, California tiger salamander, bay 

checkerspot butterfly, Santa Clara 

Valley dudleya, Metcalf Canyon 

jewelflower, and Tiburon paintbrush.

$131,124

2016 Allocation $1,492,000

Project Costs Total $131,124

Funds to Prior Year 

Projects 

*$1,029,102

Program Administration & 

Overhead Costs Total

$331,774
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 881

 916

 940

 959

 984

 1,010

 1,008

 1,008

 1,013

 1,017

 1,015

 979

 879

 792

 731

 733

 732

 706

 712

 738

 746

 771

 746

 599

 469

 480

 458

 466

 820

 882

 915

 938

 962

 978

 989

 991

 990

 997

 971

 886

 794

 714

 695

 689

 680

 683

 698

 711

 720

 743

 600

 462

 452

 455

 422

 455

 851

 900

 924

 947

 975

 1,002

 997

 1,001

 1,000

 1,010

 991

 948

 839

 750

 717

 713

 700

 693

 705

 728

 731

 759

 657

 527

 459

 469

 438

 459

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 13, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 3172.4 General. ( a ) If an operator chooses to use higher rated equipment than that authorized in the Application for Permit to Drill (APD), testing procedures shall apply to the approved working pressures, not the upgraded higher working pressures.
( b ) Some situations may exist either on a well-by-well or field-wide basis whereby it is commonly accepted practice to vary a particular minimum standard(s) established in this subpart. This situation may be resolved by requesting a variance (see § 3172.13), by the inclusion of a stipulation to the APD, or by the issuance of a Notice to Lessees and Operators (NTL) by the appropriate BLM office.
( c ) When a violation is discovered, and if it does not cause or threaten immediate substantial and adverse impact on public health and safety, the environment, production accountability or royalty income, it will be classified as minor. The violation may be reissued as a major violation if not corrected during the abatement period and continued drilling has changed the adverse impact of the violation so that it meets the specific definition of a major violation.
( d ) This subpart is not intended to circumvent the reporting requirements or compliance aspects that may be stated elsewhere in existing NTLs, regulations, etc. A lessee's compliance with the requirements of the regulations in this subpart shall not relieve the lessee of the obligation to comply with other applicable laws and regulations in accordance with 43 CFR 3162.5-1(c). Lessees should give special attention to the automatic assessment provisions in 43 CFR 3163.1(b).
( e ) This subpart is based upon the assumption that operations have been approved in accordance with 43 CFR part 3160 and subpart 3171 of this part. Failure to obtain approval prior to commencement of drilling or related operations shall subject the operator to immediate assessment under 43 CFR 3163.1(b)(2).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 385

 375

 388

 370

 366

 374

 394

 377

 373

 363

 356

 358

 359

 360

 361

 372

 414

 402

 415

 397

 373

 417

 403

 399

 411

 374

 359

 363

 362

 371

 352

 354

 352

 347

 348

 344

 344

 341

 340

 339

 336

 331

 329

 337

 338

 334

 331

 335

 337

 332

 336

 340

 344

 342

 335

 326

 325

 324

 328

 317

 359

 360

 361

 358

 356

 354

 354

 349

 347

 347

 343

 339

 338

 342

 344

 345

 348

 346

 349

 348

 345

 354

 353

 356

 351

 343

 336

 332

 336

 333

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 2, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4609 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4609

 To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
                     ecosystem restoration, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2022

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the project for hurricane and storm damage reduction and 
                     ecosystem restoration, Texas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Texas Coastal Spine Authorization 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COASTAL TEXAS PROTECTION AND RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY, 
              TEXAS.

    The Secretary of the Army is authorized to carry out the project 
for hurricane and storm damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, 
Texas, substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the 
conditions, described in the report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
September 16, 2021, at an estimated total cost of $30,906,287,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $19,237,894,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $11,668,393,000.
                                 <all>
```
#### Fred Kettler, Appellant, v. McDermott Dairy Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50654

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERTO MORALES-MARTINEZ, also known as Jorge

Sanchez Flores, also known as Aron Sanchez, also

known as Aaron Sanchez, also known as Jorge Silva,

also known as Jorge S. Landeros, also known as

Jorge Flores Sanchez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-02-CR-660-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Alberto Morales-Martinez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Morales-Martinez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element
No. 03-50654

-2-

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Morales-Martinez maintains that

he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence

exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be

imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Morales-Martinez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 475.81

 476.00

 475.85

 476.35

 476.17

 476.19

 476.21

 476.29

 476.33

 476.37

 476.00

 476.35

 479.13

 481.34

 481.97

 481.28

 481.77

 482.60

 483.09

 483.49

 484.50

 484.75

 485.20

 485.58

 486.45

 488.14

 487.12

 488.36

 33,662

 33,800

 33,691

 34,059

 33,926

 33,941

 33,955

 34,015

 34,044

 34,074

 33,800

 34,059

 36,158

 37,896

 38,402

 37,848

 38,241

 38,917

 39,319

 39,651

 40,496

 40,707

 41,090

 41,416

 42,168

 43,657

 42,752

 43,854

STORAGE

+241

+138

-109

+368

-133

+15

+14

+60

+29

+30

-274

+259

+2,099

+1,738

+506

-554

+393

+676

+402

+332

+845

+211

+383

+326

+752

+1,489

-905

+1,102

CHANGE

1,014

968

842

1,081

838

1,399

1,452

1,483

1,469

1,470

1,317

1,586

2,522

2,351

1,718

1,172

1,652

1,798

1,653

1,600

1,847

1,534

1,619

1,584

1,804

2,180

600

1,531

INFLOW

 892

 895

 894

 893

 903

 1,390

 1,444

 1,452

 1,453

 1,454

 1,454

 1,455

 1,463

 1,474

 1,462

 1,447

 1,450

 1,456

 1,449

 1,430

 1,421

 1,427

 1,423

 1,416

 1,423

 1,427

 1,052

 972

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 3

 3

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 4

 4

 1

 1

 3

 0

 1

 3

 4

 2

 2

 4

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/01/2013

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +10,433 42,084 36,771 0 0 51

ACRE-FEET +10,433 83,474 72,935 0 0 101

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 72,935

SPILL 0 72,935

 33,421

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,001

 949

 833

 1,067

 845

 1,366

 1,445

 1,496

 1,417

 1,453

 1,307

 1,565

 2,462

 2,321

 1,698

 1,171

 1,665

 1,763

 1,584

 1,574

 1,804

 1,536

 1,599

 1,565

 1,785

 2,151

 598

 1,500

 41,520

 82,355

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 246

 249

 249

 250

 251

 251

 253

 256

 254

 252

 248

 248

 240

 253

 246

 257

 253

 286

 258

 256

 256

 256

 258

 262

 264

 266

 273

 274

 294

 287

 280

 227

 227

 226

 231

 234

 236

 236

 238

 235

 233

 229

 222

 228

 226

 228

 228

 234

 237

 238

 239

 238

 239

 241

 242

 238

 246

 253

 256

 260

 267

 266

 237

 239

 239

 242

 245

 245

 245

 245

 245

 243

 237

 234

 235

 236

 239

 240

 243

 251

 250

 249

 249

 248

 249

 250

 254

 257

 260

 265

 273

 274

 273

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER