alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2568.106 In what situations could a CSU manager generally find an allotment to be inconsistent with the purposes of a CSU? An allotment could generally be inconsistent in situations including, but not limited to, the following: ( a ) If, by itself or as part of a group of allotments, it could significantly interfere with biological, physical, cultural, scenic, recreational, natural quiet or subsistence values of the CSU.
( b ) If, by itself or as part of a group of allotments, it obstructs access by the public or managing agency to the resource values of surrounding CSU lands.
( c ) If, by itself or as part of a group of allotments, it could trigger development or future uses in an area that would adversely affect resource values of surrounding CSU lands.
( d ) If it is isolated from existing private properties and opens an area of a CSU to new access and uses that adversely affect resource values of the surrounding CSU lands.
( e ) If it interferes with the implementation of the CSU management plan.
§ 30.186 How do I renounce an inherited interest? To renounce an interest under § 30.180, you must file with the judge a written declaration or Tribal resolution specifying the interest to be renounced. The declaration must be signed by you and acknowledged before a notary or judge. The Tribal resolution must be approved by appropriate Tribal authorities. ( a ) In your declaration, you may retain a life estate in a specified interest in trust or restricted land and renounce the remainder interest, or you may renounce the complete interest.
( b ) If you renounce an interest in trust or restricted land, you may either: ( 1 ) Designate an eligible person or entity meeting the requirements of § 30.183 or § 30.184 as the recipient; or
( 2 ) Renounce without making a designation.
( c ) If a distribution order to add property to the decedent's estate is issued, you may renounce an inherited interest in the property to be added by notifying the judge in writing of your intent to renounce the interest within 30 days of the mailing date of the distribution order.
[86 FR 72084, Dec. 20, 2021, as amended at 88 FR 39769, June 20, 2023]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 750

 759

 775

 809

 822

 842

 878

 790

 793

 847

 884

 875

 851

 832

 789

 757

 730

 708

 735

 724

 728

 730

 718

 720

 760

 769

 766

 771

 767

 756

 738

 681

 718

 733

 763

 779

 779

 763

 721

 733

 778

 814

 827

 782

 733

 742

 675

 681

 681

 696

 709

 705

 702

 685

 694

 708

 731

 739

 746

 734

 725

 718

 721

 747

 753

 786

 792

 799

 796

 756

 762

 816

 865

 855

 817

 757

 757

 700

 694

 698

 712

 715

 718

 718

 695

 709

 734

 752

 748

 760

 751

 742

 730

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### VASSILOS, Appellant, v. ARNOLD, Respondent.

(216 N. W. 951.)

(File No. 6106.

^pinion filed December 13, 1927.)

*Beardsley & Henderson,*of Ipswich, and *Williamson, Williamson & Smith,*of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

/. *M. Berry,*of Ipswich, and *Danforth & Barron,*of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

GATES, J.

Appeal by contestant in a will contest from a judgment in favor of the proponent and from an order denying new trial. This is the second appeal in this case. See 47 S. D. 147, 196 N. W. 545, for the former opinion.

The second trial was had to a jury before the opinion of this court was handed down in State v. Nieuwenhuis, 49 S. D. 181, 207 N. W. 77. That opinion held unconstitutional the portion of section 3564, Rev. Code 1919, which declared that the verdict of a jury in the circuit court, on appeal from the county court, should have the same force and effect as a verdict in an action at law. The situation here is much the same as that in Re Estate of Lansing, 51 S. D. 615, 216 N. W. 353, the opinion in which was handed down on November 30, 1927.

*168For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment and order herein appealed from will be vacated and the cause remanded to the trial court. Unlike the remand) in that case, this case will be remanded with directions to make findings of fact and conclusions of law and to enter judgment in accordance therewith. This is done because the case has been twice tried before the same circuit judge, and we are not convinced that another trial will further enlighten the trial court, nor are we convinced that the trial court, upon the last trial, erred to the prejudice of appellant in excluding evidence.

■CAMPBELL, P. J., and FOLLEY, SHERWOOD, and BURCH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

                             Chase Auto Owner Trust
                              2005-A (the "Trust")

I, Keith Schuck, the President of Chase Bank USA, National Association, the
depositor of assets into the above-referenced Trust, certifies that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
      8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
      periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the Trust;

2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
      does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
      a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
      circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
      the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
      to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale and servicing
      agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in
      this annual report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
      accordance with the terms of the sale and servicing agreement, and except
      as disclosed in this annual report, the servicer has fulfilled its
      obligations under the sale and servicing agreement; and

5.    This annual report discloses all significant deficiencies relating to the
      servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
      report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
      review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
      Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the sale and
      servicing agreement, that is included in this annual report.

Date: March 31, 2006


/s/ Keith Schuck
--------------------------------------
Name:  Keith Schuck
Title: President
Company: Chase Bank USA, National Association
§ 2807.16 Under what conditions may BLM order an immediate temporary suspension of my activities? ( a ) If BLM determines that you have violated one or more of the terms, conditions, or stipulations of your grant, we can order an immediate temporary suspension of activities within the right-of-way area to protect public health or safety or the environment. BLM can require you to stop your activities before holding an administrative proceeding on the matter.
( b ) BLM may issue the immediate temporary suspension order orally or in writing to you, your contractor or subcontractor, or to any representative, agent, or employee representing you or conducting the activity. When you receive the order, you must stop the activity immediately. BLM will, as soon as practical, confirm an oral order by sending or hand delivering to you or your agent at your address a written suspension order explaining the reasons for it.
( c ) You may file a written request for permission to resume activities at any time after BLM issues the order. In the request, give the facts supporting your request and the reasons you believe that BLM should lift the order. BLM must grant or deny your request within 5 business days after receiving it. If BLM does not respond within 5 business days, BLM has denied your request. You may appeal the denial under § 2801.10 of this part.
( d ) The immediate temporary suspension order is effective until you receive BLM's written notice to proceed with your activities.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 827.65

 827.66

 827.63

 827.63

 827.63

 827.62

 827.60

 827.59

 827.59

 827.59

 827.58

 827.57

 827.56

 827.56

 827.56

 827.55

 827.53

 827.53

 827.56

 827.60

 828.14

 829.13

 829.76

 830.88

 831.25

 831.57

 832.01

 832.28

 832.41

 832.46

 832.46

 34.67

 34.69

 34.65

 34.65

 34.65

 34.64

 34.62

 34.61

 34.61

 34.61

 34.60

 34.59

 34.58

 34.58

 34.58

 34.57

 34.55

 34.55

 34.58

 34.62

 35.19

 36.26

 36.94

 38.18

 38.59

 38.95

 39.45

 39.76

 39.90

 39.96

 39.96

STORAGE

+0.00

+0.01

-0.03

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

-0.02

+0.00

+0.03

+0.04

+0.57

+1.06

+0.69

+1.24

+0.41

+0.36

+0.50

+0.31

+0.15

+0.06

+0.00

CHANGE

30

36

14

30

30

24

19

26

31

30

22

23

22

28

30

25

18

30

47

51

317

567

375

653

239

211

281

187

106

59

29

INFLOW

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

SPILL

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 12

 12

 12

 12

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 13

OUTLET

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 1

 0

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 2

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .07

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .04

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .39

 1.47

 .00

 1.50

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 RUN DATE: 02/14/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +5.30 3,590 425 465 36 1.11 3.41

ACRE-FEET +5,300 7,121 843 922 71

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 922

OUTLET

TOTAL

 843

 1,765

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.41

JULY 1, 2011 6.80

 34.67

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 673

 713

 859

 975

 1,056

 1,084

 1,099

 1,097

 1,106

 1,131

 1,184

 1,182

 1,105

 1,037

 978

 953

 892

 867

 868

 873

 865

 876

 687

 764

 868

 900

 907

 976

 612

 665

 718

 866

 976

 1,048

 1,041

 1,078

 1,093

 1,105

 1,126

 1,125

 1,038

 976

 951

 875

 848

 727

 861

 856

 846

 705

 618

 638

 757

 859

 882

 908

 636

 681

 786

 915

 1,019

 1,075

 1,092

 1,092

 1,102

 1,119

 1,162

 1,150

 1,066

 1,004

 963

 917

 868

 851

 864

 863

 857

 793

 635

 723

 828

 883

 899

 943

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
§ 684.440 How is funding for supplemental youth services determined? ( a ) Supplemental youth funding will be allocated to eligible INA program grantees on the basis of the relative number of INA youth between the ages of 14 and 24 living in poverty in the grantee's geographic service area compared to the number of INA youth between the ages of 14 and 24 living in poverty in all eligible geographic service areas. The Department reserves the right to redefine the supplemental youth funding stream in future program years, in consultation with the Native American Employment and Training Council, as program experience warrants and as appropriate data become available.
( b ) The data used to implement this formula are provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
( c ) The hold harmless factor described in § 684.270(c) also applies to supplemental youth services funding. This factor also will be determined in consultation with the grantee community and the Native American Employment and Training Council.
( d ) The reallocation provisions of § 684.270(d) also apply to supplemental youth services funding.
( e ) Any supplemental youth services funds not allotted to a grantee or refused by a grantee may be used for the purposes outlined in § 684.270(e), as described in § 684.260. Any such funds are in addition to, and not subject to the limitations on, amounts reserved under § 684.270(e).
§ 2803.11 Can another person act on my behalf? Another person may act on your behalf if you have authorized that person to do so under the laws of the State where the right-of-way is or will be located. ( a ) If you intend to designate another person or entity to act on your behalf or operate as your third-party agent, you must first: ( 1 ) Notify the BLM office having jurisdiction over your grant in writing of your intention and provide a copy of the Power of Attorney, if one exists; and
( 2 ) Provide and then maintain the current contact information for the intended agent.
( b ) If you designate an agent or third-party to act on your behalf after you have been issued a grant, you are still responsible for ensuring the terms and conditions of the grant are followed.
[89 FR 25959, Apr. 12, 2024]
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 320 296 308

2 318 283 303

3 298 282 290

4 282 247 262

5 252 239 245

6 240 237 239

7 273 241 258

8 281 270 276

9 274 236 255

10 231 209 220

11 214 188 204

12 185 151 167

13 150 138 142

14 167 143 154

15 175 158 167

16 157 138 145

17 155 150 153

18 153 137 145

19 155 136 145

20 183 157 169

21 217 184 206

22 216 179 204

23 178 158 169

24 169 148 162

25 179 162 172

26 188 180 185

27 215 186 201

28 233 210 223

29 239 227 233

30 226 204 213

31 207 194 200

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Union Island On Old River At Middle River 

Period: August 2023 Run Date: 10/11/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 829.15

 828.96

 828.72

 828.42

 828.09

 828.35

 828.61

 828.90

 829.11

 829.29

 829.48

 829.64

 829.80

 829.95

 830.10

 830.22

 830.36

 830.43

 830.53

 830.62

 830.73

 830.81

 830.87

 830.94

 831.00

 831.06

 831.08

 831.12

 831.17

 36.28

 36.07

 35.81

 35.49

 35.14

 35.42

 35.70

 36.01

 36.23

 36.43

 36.64

 36.81

 36.99

 37.15

 37.31

 37.45

 37.60

 37.68

 37.79

 37.89

 38.01

 38.10

 38.17

 38.24

 38.31

 38.38

 38.40

 38.45

 38.50

STORAGE

-0.13

-0.21

-0.26

-0.32

-0.35

+0.28

+0.28

+0.31

+0.23

+0.20

+0.21

+0.17

+0.18

+0.16

+0.17

+0.13

+0.15

+0.08

+0.11

+0.10

+0.12

+0.09

+0.07

+0.08

+0.07

+0.07

+0.02

+0.05

+0.06

CHANGE

301

264

238

205

190

172

172

189

148

133

140

124

121

117

115

99

111

74

88

83

95

78

68

73

68

69

45

57

62

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

SPILL

 341

 341

 341

 340

 340

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

OUTLET

 1

 1

 3

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 3

 4

 5

 5

 2

 3

 1

 1

 2

 4

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .04

 .02

 .08

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .09

 .12

 .15

 .14

 .06

 .08

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .12

 .06

 .07

 .06

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .12

 .09

 .09

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

FEBRUARY 2020 RUN DATE: 11/30/2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +2.12 3,699 1,847 725 72 2.15 .00

ACRE-FEET +2,120 7,337 3,664 1,438 143

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,438

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,664

 5,102

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2019 6.60

 36.41

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 6.48
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 253

 247

 246

 233

 225

 234

 229

 242

 234

 233

 223

 207

 214

 217

 209

 211

 200

 193

 180

 189

 199

 199

 215

 220

 218

 201

 203

 190

 191

 201

 202

 200

 206

 202

 195

 194

 191

 188

 188

 192

 190

 182

 163

 172

 172

 166

 170

 158

 157

 153

 163

 171

 147

 169

 177

 170

 171

 177

 164

 161

 167

 162

 230

 234

 226

 220

 213

 217

 214

 214

 214

 210

 204

 192

 191

 198

 195

 193

 181

 176

 171

 175

 188

 184

 196

 201

 200

 189

 190

 178

 177

 184

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1177
LESTER A.D. ADAMS; MARIBEL F. MURRAY, Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v. CHRISTOPHER A. BROOKS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:05-cv-03332-DKC) Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: June 30, 2008 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lester A.D. Adams and Maribel F. Murray, Appellants Pro Se. Johnathan Azrael, Towson, Maryland, John R. Solter, Jr., AZAREL, GANN & FRANZ, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Appellants Lester A.D. Adams and Maribel F. Murray appeal the district court’s judgment dismissing their civil action filed to quiet title to certain residential real property and for specific performance of a purchase option as to the property. After a bench trial, this court reviews the district court’s conclusions of law de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. Minyard Enter., Inc. v. Southeastern Chem. & Solvent Co. , 184 F.3d 373, 380 (4th Cir. 1999); Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a). A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when, “although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United States v. United States Gypsum Co. , 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948); In re Green , 934 F.2d 568, 570 (4th Cir. 1991). We have reviewed the parties’ informal briefs and the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Adams v. Brooks , No. 8:05-cv-03332-DKC (D. Md. July 25, 2007; Jan. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 3140.32 Action on an application.

The authorized officer will take action on an application for conversion within 15 months of receipt of a proposed plan of operations.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 501.30

 501.62

 501.15

 500.64

 500.14

 499.51

 500.00

 499.73

 499.19

 498.59

 498.75

 500.68

 500.07

 499.79

 499.28

 498.75

 500.03

 499.45

 498.87

 499.83

 499.66

 501.38

 501.01

 500.65

 500.25

 499.79

 499.34

 499.10

 500.41

 500.56

 500.93

 56,718

 57,071

 56,552

 55,997

 55,455

 54,780

 55,303

 55,015

 54,439

 53,805

 53,973

 56,040

 55,379

 55,079

 54,535

 53,973

 55,336

 54,716

 54,099

 55,122

 54,940

 56,806

 56,398

 56,008

 55,574

 55,079

 54,599

 54,343

 55,747

 55,910

 56,311

STORAGE

+2,322

+353

-519

-555

-542

-675

+523

-288

-576

-634

+168

+2,067

-661

-300

-544

-562

+1,363

-620

-617

+1,023

-182

+1,866

-408

-390

-434

-495

-480

-256

+1,404

+163

+401

CHANGE

1,504

509

74

61

90

27

625

227

80

47

451

1,400

43

213

90

81

1,053

54

55

866

218

1,231

85

93

72

43

48

150

980

362

486

INFLOW

 332

 330

 332

 338

 361

 367

 359

 370

 369

 366

 365

 357

 376

 363

 363

 363

 365

 366

 365

 349

 308

 290

 290

 289

 290

 292

 289

 279

 271

 279

 283

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 1

 4

 3

 2

 0

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/24/2002

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,915 11,318 10,316 0 0 36

ACRE-FEET +1,915 22,449 20,462 0 0 71

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 20,462

SPILL 0 20,462

 54,396

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,452

 284

 0

 0

 28

 0

 795

 0

 0

 0

 437

 1,387

 0

 146

 102

 124

 995

 0

 0

 740

 0

 1,173

 0

 0

 0

 24

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,687

 15,247

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, Kevin J. Wiersma, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)                      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)                      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:   May
      4, 2010
            By:   /s/
      Kevin J. WiersmaKevin
      J. Wiersma
              Chief
      Financial
Officer
#### Irwin J. Hesley, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ellen D. Hesley, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-220;

Second District —

August 17, 1973.

Carbary, Carbary & Chapski, of Elgin, for appellant.

Matthews, Jordan, Dean, Eichmeier & Peterson, of Aurora, for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GUILD.