alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3203.10 How are lands included in a competitive sale? ( a ) A qualified company or individual may nominate lands for competitive sale by submitting an applicable BLM nomination form.
( b ) A nomination is a description of lands that you seek to be included in one lease. Each nomination may not exceed 5,120 acres, unless the area to be leased includes an irregular subdivision. Your nomination must provide a description of the lands nominated by legal land description. ( 1 ) For lands surveyed under the public land rectangular survey system, describe the lands to the nearest aliquot part within the legal subdivision, section, township, and range;
( 2 ) For unsurveyed lands, describe the lands by metes and bounds, giving courses and distances, and tie this information to an official corner of the public land surveys, or to a prominent topographic feature;
( 3 ) For approved protracted surveys, include an entire section, township, and range. Do not divide protracted sections into aliquot parts;
( 4 ) For unsurveyed lands in Louisiana and Alaska that have water boundaries, discuss the description with BLM before submission; and
( 5 ) For fractional interest lands, identify the United States mineral ownership by percentage.
( c ) You may submit more than one nomination, as long as each nomination separately satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section and includes the filing fee specified in § 3203.12.
( d ) BLM may reconfigure lands to be included in each parcel offered for sale.
( e ) BLM may include land in a lease sale on its own initiative.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 834

 835

 911

 943

 899

 912

 914

 905

 857

 881

 892

 822

 799

 725

 771

 792

 814

 854

 868

 880

 916

 922

 950

 946

 958

 966

 975

 946

 875

 887

 826

 785

 789

 807

 866

 840

 836

 895

 868

 797

 826

 832

 787

 729

 679

 695

 764

 774

 828

 822

 846

 843

 881

 885

 929

 913

 926

 929

 862

 816

 840

 639

 802

 804

 841

 911

 864

 879

 903

 885

 831

 847

 862

 806

 771

 695

 741

 778

 792

 841

 851

 864

 871

 904

 916

 937

 940

 957

 961

 917

 842

 865

 748

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 21,930

 22,150

 22,366

 22,629

 22,816

 22,978

 23,159

 23,306

 23,408

 23,511

 23,624

 23,698

 23,731

 23,670

 23,674

 23,726

 23,797

 23,915

 24,045

 24,192

 24,346

 24,500

 24,661

 24,822

 24,996

 25,201

 25,391

 25,544

 25,599

 25,678

 25,624

 731

 738

 746

 754

 761

 766

 772

 777

 780

 784

 787

 790

 791

 789

 789

 791

 793

 797

 802

 806

 812

 817

 822

 827

 833

 840

 846

 851

 853

 856

 854

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
|EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Kevin J. Wiersma, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |                           
|-------------------- | --------------------------
|Dated:   May 5, 2004 | By:   /s/ Kevin J. Wiersma
|                     | Kevin J. Wiersma          
|                     | Chief Financial Officer   

|26
|--
§ 726.305 Contents of notice. The notice required by § 726.304 shall: ( a ) Identify the operator against whom the penalty is assessed, as well as the name of any other person severally liable for such penalty;
( b ) Set forth the determination of the Director as to the amount of the penalty and the reason or reasons therefor;
( c ) Set forth the right of each person identified in paragraph (a) of this section to contest the notice and request a hearing before the Office of Administrative Law Judges;
( d ) Set forth the method for each person identified in paragraph (a) to contest the notice and request a hearing before the Office of Administrative Law Judges; and
( e ) Inform any affected person that in the absence of a timely contest and request for hearing received within 30 days of the date of receipt of the notice, the Director's assessment will become final and unappealable as to that person.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 233]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2127]]

Public Law 113-233
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To expand the program of priority review to encourage treatments for 
        tropical diseases. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2014 -  [S. 2917]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Adding Ebola to 
the FDA Priority Review Voucher Program Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 21 USC 301 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority 
Review Voucher Program Act''.
SEC. 2. PRIORITY REVIEW TO ENCOURAGE TREATMENTS FOR TROPICAL 
                    DISEASES.

    Section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360n) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(3)--
                    (A) by redesignating subparagraph (Q) as 
                subparagraph (R);
                    (B) by inserting after subparagraph (P) the 
                following:
                    ``(Q) Filoviruses.''; and
                    (C) in subparagraph (R), as so redesignated, by 
                striking ``regulation by'' and inserting ``order of''; 
                and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by adding ``There is no limit 
                on the number of times a priority review voucher may be 
                transferred before such voucher is used.'' after the 
                period at the end; and

[[Page 128 STAT. 2128]]

                    (B) in paragraph (4), by striking ``365 days'' and 
                inserting ``90 days''.

    Approved December 16, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2917:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Dec. 2, considered and passed Senate.
            Dec. 3, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-Speed Stability-and-Control and Ground-Effects Measurements on the Industry Reference High Speed Civil TransportAs a part of a national effort to develop an economically feasible High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT), a single configuration has been accepted as the testing baseline by the organizations working in the High Speed Research (HSR) program. The configuration is based on a design developed by the Boeing Company and is referred to as the Reference H (Ref H). The data contained in this report are low-speed stability-and-control and ground-effect measurements obtained on a 0.06 scale model of the Ref H in a subsonic tunnel.Document ID20000025329Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKemmerly, Guy T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Campbell, Bryan A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Banks, Daniel W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Yaros, Steven F.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1999Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209702L-17920NASA/TM-1999-209702Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-03-22-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000025329.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 2802.10 What lands are available for grants? ( a ) In its discretion, BLM may grant rights-of-way on any lands under its jurisdiction except when: ( 1 ) A statute, regulation, or public land order specifically excludes rights-of-way;
( 2 ) The lands are specifically segregated or withdrawn from right-of-way uses; or
( 3 ) BLM identifies areas in its land use plans or in the analysis of an application as inappropriate for right-of-way uses.
( b ) BLM may require common use of a right-of-way and may require, to the extent practical, location of new rights-of-way within existing or designated right-of-way corridors (*see* § 2802.11 of this subpart). Safety and other considerations may limit the extent to which you may share a right-of-way. BLM will designate right-of-way corridors through land use plan decisions.
( c ) You should contact the BLM to: ( 1 ) Determine the appropriate BLM office with which to coordinate;
( 2 ) Determine whether or not the land you want to use is available for that use; and
( 3 ) Begin discussions about any application(s) you may need to file.
[70 FR 21058, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 89 FR 25959, Apr. 12, 2024]
### R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n

­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 6 8 3

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T u e s d a y

, S e p t e m b e r 1 5

, 2 0 1 5 4 : 0 1 P M

T o : F u g a t i l l c @ g m a i l

. c o m

D e a r M r

. F u g a t e :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f

o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f r o m y o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k e t N o

. F A

A

− 2 0 1 5

− 2 6 8 3 )

. T h i s i n f

o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n

A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A

A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.

P r o v i d e a c o p y o f t h e M o t i o n P i c t u r e a n d T e l e v i s i o n O p e r a t i o n s M a n u a l ( M P T O M ) w h i c h

i s r e q u i r e d b y O r d e r 8 9 0 0

. 1

, V o l u m e 3

, C h a p t e r 8

, S e c t i o n 1

. I f y o u w i s h f o r u s t o

p r o c e e d w i t h o u t t h i s m a n u a l a n d r e m o v e c l o s e d

‐ s e t f i l m i n g f r o m y o u r p r o p o s e d o p e r a t i o n

p l e a s e i n f o r m o f u s o f y o u r i n t e n t i o n b y t h e r e q u e s t e d r e s p o n s e d a t e l i s t e d b e l o w

.

P l e a s e s u b m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

‐ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t

a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v a n d s u b m i t a n y p r o p r i e t a r y i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e F A

A H e a d q u a r t e r s o r

e l e c t r o n i c a l l y v i a e m a i l t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y o u w a n t u s t o p r o c e s s y o u r r e q u e s t a n y

f u r t h e r

, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v e b y 9 / 2 9 / 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t r e c e i v e t h e

i n f o r m a t i o n

, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

R e g a r d s

,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g

2 0 2

­ 2 6 7

­ 4 2 6 4
§ 3135.4 When is a suspension of operations and production effective? A suspension of operations and production is effective— ( a ) The first day of the month in which you file the application for suspension or BLM requires the suspension; or
( b ) Any other date BLM specifies in the decision document.
[67 FR 17886, Apr. 11, 2002]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 350

 351

 350

 357

 356

 360

 370

 371

 356

 363

 347

 361

 362

 379

 377

 375

 373

 381

 383

 377

 389

 385

 389

 392

 386

 392

 383

 387

 383

 384

 380

 323

 324

 326

 330

 340

 324

 346

 329

 299

 286

 291

 275

 304

 327

 350

 355

 322

 333

 356

 363

 360

 359

 357

 356

 354

 354

 355

 354

 353

 355

 355

 331

 334

 337

 341

 347

 347

 357

 354

 334

 325

 311

 319

 338

 352

 363

 367

 363

 368

 371

 369

 371

 370

 370

 369

 366

 368

 365

 365

 362

 360

 363

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15-14(a)Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of Playlogic Entertainment, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Willem M. Smit, certify,pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-14(a) and 15-14(a), that1. I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Playlogic Entertainment, Inc.; 2 Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this Report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Companyas of, and for, the periods presented in this Report; 4. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this Report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release 33-8238;  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this Reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this Report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this Report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (theCompany’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Company’sinternal controls over financial reporting.        Date: December 21, 2006 /s/ Willem M. Smit   Willem M. Smit   Chief Executive Officer
### §1779g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 107–331, title VI, §609, Dec. 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 2855, which related to the effect of this subchapter on claims, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §46. Preference to Indians in employment of clerical, mechanical, and other help

Preference shall at all times, as far as practicable, be given to Indians in the employment of clerical, mechanical, and other help on reservations and about agencies.

(May 17, 1882, ch. 163, §6, 22 Stat. 88; July 4, 1884, ch. 180, §6, 23 Stat. 97.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 3174.7 LACT system—general requirements. ( a ) A LACT system must meet the construction and operation requirements and minimum standards of this section, § 3174.8, and § 3174.4.
( b ) A LACT system must be proven as prescribed in § 3174.11 of this subpart.
( c ) Measurement tickets must be completed under § 3174.12(b) of this subpart.
( d ) All components of a LACT system must be accessible for inspection by the AO.
( e ) ( 1 ) The operator must notify the AO, within 72 hours after discovery, of any LACT system failures or equipment malfunctions that may have resulted in measurement error.
( 2 ) Such system failures or equipment malfunctions include, but are not limited to, electrical, meter, and other failures that affect oil measurement.
( f ) Any tests conducted on oil samples extracted from LACT system samplers for determination of temperature, oil gravity, and S&W content must meet the requirements and minimum standards in § 3174.6(b)(2), (4), and (6) of this subpart.
( g ) Automatic temperature compensators and automatic temperature and gravity compensators are prohibited.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6902** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHAUN EUGENE REED , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling
. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:05

- cr - 00003

- GMG

- JES

- 1 )

Submitted : October 25, 2016 Decided: November 4, 2016

Before KING , SHEDD , and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Shaun Eugene Reed , Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg , West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shaun Eu gene Reed appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition for a writ of error coram nobis and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d) motion to vacate judgment . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. As the district court correctly determined, t he Federal Rules of Civil Procedure do not provide a vehicle by which Reed may cha llenge his criminal judgment. See United States v. O’Keefe , 169 F.3d 281, 289 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Mosavi , 138 F.3d 1365, 1366 (11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). Additionally, Reed did not satisfy the “ four essential prerequisites ” needed to obtain coram nobis relief. See Bereano v. United States , 706 F.3d 568 , 576 (4th Cir. 2013). We therefore affirm the district court ’s order. United States v. Reed , No. 3:05

- cr - 00003

- GMG

- JES

- 1 (N.D.
W. Va. June 28, 2016)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the de cisional process.
AFFIRMED
### §§332, 333. Repealed. Pub. L. 106–462, title I, §106(a)(1), Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 2007

Section 332, act Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, §2, 24 Stat. 388, related to selection of allotments.

Section 333, acts Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, §3, 24 Stat. 389; June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §9, 36 Stat. 858; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100, related to making of allotments by agents.
#### § 2568.111 What if BLM decides that I qualify for land that is in the category of Federal land that BLM cannot convey?

BLM will notify you in writing that you are eligible to choose an alternative allotment from lands described in section 2568.110.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 220

 224

 228

 234

 256

 252

 266

 270

 265

 265

 252

 257

 260

 308

 277

 262

 251

 243

 239

 243

 315

 340

 279

 245

 265

 280

 361

 310

 292

 254

 255

 197

 204

 210

 217

 224

 230

 232

 232

 236

 230

 225

 228

 227

 228

 227

 227

 227

 226

 225

 222

 227

 229

 226

 228

 227

 224

 223

 225

 229

 231

 229

 208

 216

 219

 225

 235

 242

 253

 252

 251

 244

 237

 238

 235

 243

 237

 235

 234

 231

 233

 231

 240

 250

 240

 237

 237

 237

 243

 245

 239

 236

 237

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER