alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 498

 454

 423

 388

 353

 323

 316

 303

 308

 301

 294

 292

 313

 297

 343

 307

 305

 344

 311

 314

 308

 309

 309

 302

 296

 341

 313

 290

 287

 258

 269

 272

 285

 285

 290

 293

 248

 238

 239

 229

 221

 220

 249

 259

 264

 267

 257

 246

 257

 248

 233

 235

 249

 242

 237

 232

 236

 247

 257

 242

 217

 191

 346

 341

 331

 335

 316

 292

 282

 277

 280

 268

 266

 268

 271

 282

 295

 284

 277

 287

 286

 276

 274

 281

 280

 275

 265

 266

 278

 272

 269

 238

 230

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 4, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 2803.12 What happens to my grant or lease if I die? ( a ) If a grant holder dies, any inheritable interest in a grant or lease will be distributed under State law.
( b ) If the receiver of a grant or lease is not qualified to hold a grant or lease under § 2803.10 of this subpart, the BLM will recognize the receiver as grant or leaseholder for up to two years, subject to full compliance with all terms, conditions, and stipulations. During that period, the receiver must either become qualified or divest itself of the interest.
[89 FR 35678, May 1, 2024]
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the quarterly report of Bucyrus International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy W.
Sullivan, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Craig R. Mackus, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ T. W. Sullivan                   
|Timothy W. Sullivan                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 8, 2008                       
|                                     
|/s/ C. R. Mackus                     
|Craig R. Mackus                      
|Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|August 8, 2008                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
377 P.2d 962

#### J. C. WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT et al., Respondents.

No. 17 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 29, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CARMODY, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted, and the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason the petition is premature.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4401

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus KOFIE AKIEM JONES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-03-47) Submitted: January 19, 2005 Decided: February 9, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brian A. Glasser, Leah P. Macia, BAILEY & GLASSER, L.L.P., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas E. Johnston, United States Attorney, Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Michael D. Stein, Assistant United States Attorneys, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).PER CURIAM: Kofie Akiem Jones (“Jones”) appeals the final judgment of the district court sentencing him to six concurrent life sentences. Following a jury trial, the district court concluded that Jones was a “Three Strikes” offender pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3559(c)(1) (2000). This determination was made during Jones’ sentencing hearing, in which the district court conducted a special inquiry and determined that Jones was convicted of at least two prior offenses that qualify as “serious violent felonies” under § 3559(c)(2)(F). On appeal, Jones challenges the use of a 1996 conviction for a 1994 robbery as a “strike” under the statute. Jones argues that his 1994 robbery was a “non-qualifying felony” under § 3559(c)(1) because Jones and his accomplice (1) never brandished a weapon or (2) threatened to use a weapon. Based on our thorough review of the record, we find that statements made by Jones and his accomplice to the victim, combined with the appearance of large, protruding objects under the robbers’ pants, conveyed a threat that the victim might be assaulted with those objects. As a result, we find that Jones has failed to prove, by clear and convincing evidence, that no “threat of use” of a firearm or dangerous weapon was involved in the 1994 robbery. SeeUnited States v. Kaluna , 192 F.3d 1188, 1193-94 (9th Cir. 1999) (stating that if a defendant asserts that a prior offense is a "nonqualifying felony" under § 3559(c)(3)(A), the burden shifts to- 3 - the defendant to prove this affirmative defense by clear and convincing evidence). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jones , 319 F. Supp. 2d 703 (N.D.W. Va. 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EPA R eg . N o

. 8622

- 27
Fourth Department,

March, 1948.

(March 10, 1948.)

#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Katherine Cusick, Deceased, Eugene Manning, Appellant; Bessie Wistner et al., Respondents.

Decree and order affirmed, with costs to all respondents filing briefs payable out of the estate. All concur. (The decree admits a will to probate. The order denies contestant’s motion to deny probate and for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Larkin, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 505.54

 505.45

 503.98

 502.56

 503.14

 503.75

 503.99

 504.32

 504.71

 503.63

 504.33

 503.53

 504.11

 503.46

 502.61

 501.32

 501.71

 502.32

 503.00

 502.59

 502.18

 501.96

 501.35

 501.57

 501.64

 501.40

 500.91

 500.30

 499.97

 499.52

 499.26

 61,542

 61,436

 59,727

 58,117

 58,770

 59,465

 59,739

 60,120

 60,571

 59,328

 60,132

 59,214

 59,877

 59,134

 58,173

 56,740

 57,170

 57,848

 58,610

 58,151

 57,692

 57,446

 56,773

 57,016

 57,093

 56,828

 56,289

 55,628

 55,271

 54,791

 54,513

STORAGE

+797

-106

-1,709

-1,610

+653

+695

+274

+381

+451

-1,243

+804

-918

+663

-743

-961

-1,433

+430

+678

+762

-459

-459

-246

-673

+243

+77

-265

-539

-661

-357

-480

-278

CHANGE

1,287

844

9

29

1,227

1,231

944

919

897

-4

960

28

732

8

12

11

1,177

1,541

1,660

1,041

1,201

1,368

1,152

1,484

1,306

1,130

821

471

383

70

69

INFLOW

 864

 892

 860

 836

 893

 878

 801

 724

 663

 615

 549

 485

 388

 374

 487

 724

 954

 1,196

 1,269

 1,268

 1,427

 1,489

 1,482

 1,355

 1,263

 1,260

 1,091

 799

 560

 308

 207

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 21

 5

 11

 5

 5

 3

 5

 3

 7

 8

 6

 6

 10

 9

 9

 9

 6

 3

 7

 4

 5

 3

 9

 6

 4

 4

 2

 5

 3

 4

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/01/2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -6,232 24,008 26,961 0 0 189

ACRE-FEET -6,232 47,620 53,477 0 0 375

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 53,477

SPILL 0 53,477

 60,745

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,265

 847

 25

 43

 1,202

 1,208

 947

 926

 880

 9

 948

 37

 717

 13

 20

 23

 1,171

 1,524

 1,656

 1,043

 1,207

 1,364

 1,142

 1,409

 1,300

 1,135

 853

 446

 387

 52

 68

 23,867

 47,340

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
§ 30.122 Is the judge required to accept the master's recommended decision? No, the judge is not required to accept the master's recommended decision. ( a ) An interested party may file objections to the report and recommended decision within 30 days of the date of mailing. An objecting party must simultaneously mail or deliver copies of the objections to all other interested parties.
( b ) Any other interested party may file responses to the objections within 15 days of the mailing or delivery of the objections. A responding party must simultaneously mail or deliver a copy of his or her responses to the objecting party.
( c ) The judge will review the record of the proceedings heard by the master, including any objections and responses filed, and determine whether the master's report and recommended decision are supported by the evidence of record. ( 1 ) If the judge finds that the report and recommended decision are supported by the evidence of record and are consistent with applicable law, the judge will enter an order adopting the recommended decision.
( 2 ) If the judge finds that the report and recommended decision are not supported by the evidence of record, the judge may do any of the following: ( i ) Remand the case to the master for further proceedings consistent with instructions in the remand order;
( ii ) Make new findings of fact based on the evidence in the record, make conclusions of law, and enter a decision; or
( iii ) Hear the case de novo, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and enter a decision.
( 3 ) The judge may find that the master's findings of fact are supported by the evidence in the record but the conclusions of law or the recommended decision is not consistent with applicable law. In this case, the judge will issue an order adopting the findings of fact, making conclusions of law, and entering a decision.
### §5353. Fair trade in financial services

#### (a) Discussions

When advantageous the President or his designee shall conduct discussions with the governments of countries that are major financial centers, aimed at:

(1) ensuring that United States banking organizations and securities companies have access to foreign markets and receive national treatment in those markets;

(2) reducing or eliminating barriers to, and other distortions of, international trade in financial services;

(3) achieving reasonable comparability in the types of financial services permissible for financial service companies; and

(4) developing uniform supervisory standards for banking organizations and securities companies, including uniform capital standards.

#### (b) Consultation before discussions

Before entering into those discussions, the President or his designee shall consult with the committees of jurisdiction in the Senate and the House of Representatives.

#### (c) Recommendations

After completing those discussions and after consultation with the committees of jurisdiction, the President shall transmit to the Congress any recommendations that have emerged from those discussions. Any recommendations for changes in United States financial laws or practices shall be accompanied by a description of the changes in foreign financial laws or practices that would accompany action by the Congress, and by an explanation of the benefits that would accrue to the United States from adoption of the recommendations.

#### (d) Construction of section

Nothing in this section may be construed as prior approval of any legislation which may be necessary to implement any recommendations resulting from discussions under this section.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3603, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1387.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under this section delegated to Secretary of the Treasury by section 1 of Ex. Ord. No. 12781, Nov. 20, 1991, 56 F.R. 59203, set out as a note under section 301 of Title 3, The President.
### §482. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 482 was editorially reclassified as section 5133 of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO §906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the period
ended August 2, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: September 11, 2003
    
    /s/ R. Michael RouleauR. Michael Rouleau
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Jeffrey N. BoyerJeffrey N. Boyer
Executive Vice President  Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
### §1300l–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–434, title II, §206, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4535; Pub. L. 104–109, §8(b), Feb. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 765, which provided for governance of the tribe by an Interim Council until adoption of a new tribal constitution and bylaws, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 1871.0-3 Authority.

The Act of September 20, 1922 (42 Stat. 857; 43 U.S.C. 1161-1163), as modified by section 403 of Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1946 (60 Stat. 1100), reads as follows:

Sec. 1161. The Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate, is authorized to decide upon principles of equity and justice, as recognized in courts of equity, and in accordance with regulations to be approved by the Secretary of the Interior, consistently with such principles, all cases of suspended entries of public lands and of suspended preemption land claims, and to adjudge in what cases patents shall issue upon the same.

Sec. 1162. Every such adjudication shall be approved by the Secretary of the Interior and shall operate only to divest the United States of the title to the land embraced thereby, without prejudice to the rights of conflicting claimants.

Sec. 1163. Where patents have been already issued on entries which are approved by the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior, or such officer as he may designate, upon the canceling of the outstanding patent, is authorized to issue a new patent, on such approval, to the person who made the entry, his heirs or assigns.
#### Matthew J. O’Neill, Respondent, v. The City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 155

 154

 159

 146

 140

 138

 141

 140

 147

 145

 142

 135

 139

 141

 141

 147

 143

 139

 145

 145

 139

 148

 139

 140

 143

 145

 148

 140

 138

 142

 143

 142

 141

 138

 134

 132

 132

 131

 131

 129

 130

 130

 128

 128

 129

 131

 131

 132

 132

 131

 131

 134

 132

 132

 132

 134

 133

 136

 133

 134

 136

 137

 146

 145

 144

 139

 136

 135

 135

 134

 134

 134

 135

 132

 131

 132

 134

 135

 136

 135

 134

 135

 136

 136

 135

 136

 137

 138

 139

 137

 135

 138

 139

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 12, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is given of the names of members of a Performance Review Board for the Department of the Army.

# DATES:

September 21, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marilyn Ervin, U.S. Army Senior Executive Service Office, Assistant Secretary of the Army, Manpower & Reserve Affairs, 111 Army, Washington, DC 20310-0111.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations, one or more Senior Executive Service performance review boards. The boards shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of senior executives' performance by supervisors and make recommendations to the appointing authority or rating official relative to the performance of these executives.

The members of the Performance Review Board for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Army element are:

1. Mr. Alfred G. Volkman, Director, International Cooperations, Office of the Under Secretary of Defense, Acquisition, Technology and Logistics.

2. Mr. Barry Pavel, Principal Director for Strategy, Office of the Secretary of Defense.

3. Mr. James J. Townsend, Principal Director for European and North Atlantic Treaty Organization Policy.

Brenda Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-21992 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
§ 10010.57 List of specific compliance responsibilities. ( a ) The Commission staff shall: ( 1 ) As deemed necessary, prepare a NEPA handbook or adapt applicable materials prepared by other agencies, providing guidance on how to implement NEPA in principal program areas.
( 2 ) Prepare program regulations or directives for applicants.
( 3 ) Propose categorical exclusions.
( 4 ) Prepare EAs.
( 5 ) Recommend whether to prepare an EIS.
( 6 ) Prepare NOIs and FONSIs.
( 7 ) Prepare EISs.
( b ) The Executive Director shall: ( 1 ) Approve agency handbooks and other NEPA guidance.
( 2 ) Approve regulations or directives for applicants.
( 3 ) Approve categorical exclusions.
( 4 ) Approve EAs.
( 5 ) Decide whether to prepare an EIS.
( 6 ) Approve NOIs and FONSIs.
( 7 ) Make recommendations regarding the adequacy of EISs.
( c ) The Chairman of the Commission, acting on behalf of the full Commission, shall: ( 1 ) Concur with regulations or directives for applicants.
( 2 ) Concur with EAs.
( 3 ) Approve EISs.
### §479a–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 479a–1 was editorially reclassified as section 5131 of this title.