U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave ., SE Washington DC 20590 Soaring Photography, Inc. 1105 Dalton Road ' ' Honeoye Falls , New York 14472

November 3 , 2015

Re: Exemption Petition Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 (the " Reform Act" ) and 14 CFR Part 11, Soaring Photography , Inc ., operator of an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) , hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (" FARs " ) to allow commercial operation of its UAS, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by Section 333. Commercial Purposes: Commercial operation of an UAS, as described herein, which are equipped with camera(s) and sensors , would operate in the following manner: I
. Aerial photography and/or video for public and/or private use including real estate, architecture , land surveying, agriculture , engineering and other related professional activities. 2. Aerial video and/or photography for public and/or private use including television, public events , cinematography and news gathering. 3. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial structures under contract with the owners or local government authority. 4. Aerial video/photography of sporting events.. '--

As described fully below, the requested exemption would permit the operation of a UAS under controlled conditions in the NAS that would be a) limited b) controlled c) predetermined and d) will provide safety enhancements to the already safe operations in the industry presently using conventional aircraft. Approval ofthis exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation's (the FAA Administrator's) responsibilities to "
....establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system." Contact Information: The name and address of the applicant is: Soaring Photography, Inc. Attn: Scott J. Koch 1105 Dalton Road Honeoye Falls , New York 14472 Ph: 585-704-8329 Email: scottjkoch @gmail.com
Regulations from which the exemption is requested : 14 CFR Part 21 subpart H 14 CFR 45.23 (b) 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 14 CFR 91.103 14 CFR 91.109 14 CFR 91.119 (c) 14 CFR 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 91.409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 91.417 (a) & (b)UAS Specifications: Soaring Photography will operate the DJI Inspire 1, Model T600, with a total weight of 2935g or 6.47lbs
. The dimensions are 438mm x 451mm x 301mm or 17
.24 inch x 17
.75 inch x 11
.85 inch
. Under still air the maximum speed is no more than 22m/s or 49mph with a cruising speed of 11rn/s or 25mph
. The DJI Inspire 1 has the ability to hover and move along a vertical and horizontal plane simultaneously. The DJI Inspire 1 has four motors, Motor Model DJI 3510 , powered by a 6-cell 4500mAh or 5700mAh Lithium Polymer battery
. There are four propellers, Propeller Model DJI 1345 , in use. The DJI Inspire 1 will be controlled with the C 1 remote controller with an operating frequency of 2.400GHz2.483GHz
. The live video feed will have an operating frequency of 5.728GHz- 5
.850GHz
. The applicant will operate the UAS in line of sight within a closed off and predetermined area owned and/operated by the property representative
. Given the small size ofthe UAS and the controlled environment provided the proposed operations will adhere to the Reform Act' s safety requirements. The approval ofthis application presents no national security issues. Regarding the level of safety surrounding the proposed operations and the public benefit, reduction in environmental impacts , including but not limited to reduced emissions and noise , the grant ofthe requested exemption is in the public interest. Accordingly the applicant requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption with minimum delay
. Equivalent Level of Safety : The operation limitations proposed for an equivalent or higher level of safety because operations will further enhance the safety of the persons and/or property using conventional aircraft. These limitations and conditions to which the applicant agrees to adhere to when conducting commercial operations under the FAA issued exemption as set f orth in the Flight Operations Manual (FOM) include: 1. The UAS wi.U weigh less than 55 lbs. 2. The UAS will have a maximum operating speed of no more than 50mph. 3
. Flights will be operated within line of sight ofthe Pilot in Command (PIC) and/or Visual Observer (VO). 4
. Maximum flight time for each operational flight will be 30 minutes. Flights will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve or 30 minutes of flight time whichever occurs first. 5. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) and not more than 200 feet above an elevated platform from which filming is planned.6. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the UAS Pilot, the Visual Observer (VO) and may include but not limited to a Camera Operator. 7. The UAS pilot will be a designated Pilot in Command (PIC) and hold a Commercial Pilot's License along with a Second or higher Class Medical Certificate
. Ifthe PIC feels another operator to be qualified with the necessary skills to be PIC & possess a Commercial Pilot's License along with a Second or higher Class Medical Certificate, that person may be designated PIC provided they have a minimum of 20 hours of flight time with the UAS. 8. A briefing will be performed regarding the planned UAS operations prior to each day ' s flight consisting of all the days' production activities. 9. All flights will occur under Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC) only. 10. The flights will occur no closer than a 5 mile radius ofthe geographic center/Airport Reference Point (ARP) of a tower controlled or uncontrolled airport. 11. Ifoperations will be within a 5 mile radius ofthe geographic center/Airport Reference Point (ARP) of a tower controll d or uncontrolled airport the respective airports will be contacted advising them ofthe estimated flight time, flig t duration , elevation of flight and other pertinent information. 12
. The operator will file FAA Form 7711-1, or its equivalent, as modified in light ofthe requested exemption, with the appropriate local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) no more than 72 hours but no less than 48 hours from planned operation. 13. The operator will obtain verbal/written consent of all persons involved with the planned operation and ensure that only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet ofthe flight operation, and the radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety determination, as required under the FOM. With the advanced permission ofthe FSDO, operations at closer range may be approved. 14. The PIC and VO will have been trained in operation ofUAS and receive up-to-date information for the particular UAS to be operated
. 15. The PIC and VO will be able to communicate by voice, radio, and/or text at all times. 16
. Written and/or verbal permission and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including law enforcement, fire or other appropriate governmental agencies. 17. If the UAS loses communications with the remote controller or loses GPS signal, the UAS will have the capability to return to a pre-determined location within a designated location and land autonomously. 18
. The UAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles, weather, or emergencies
.Exemption Requests: 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1) Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by the Applicant, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 ofthe Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 ofthe Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration ofthe size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas ofthe particular UAS. In all cases , an analysis ofthese criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed. The UAS to be operated hereunder is less than 55 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a secured and designated area. Unlike other civil aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirements. The FAA will have advance notice of all operations
. These safety enhancements provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21 , Subpart H. Lastly , application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security posed by the UAS , due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels , and inability to carry a substantial external load. 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b). Marking of the Aircraft The regulation requires: When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited , restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the opera tor must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted, " "light-sport, " "experimental, " or "provisional," as applicable
. Even though the UAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word"Experimental" can be placed. Given the size ofthe UAS, two-inch lettering will be impossible. The word "Experimental" will be placed on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29 (f). The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the UAS marked on its fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the UAS will see the identification ofthe UAS as "Experimental. " 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b) : Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations : Pilot in Command. Pursuant to 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b), no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire. Soaring Photography, Inc . may achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by current Regulations because the applicant's UAS do not carry any pilots or passengers nor property. The risks attendant to the operation of UAS is far less than the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 CFR 61. The PIC of the UAS will have a Commercial Pilot' s License along with a current Second Class or higher Medical exceeding the current safety levels in relation to 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b). I feel the operation and limitations set forth in the FOM will equate to the safe operation ofthe UAS. 14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness. The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft for maintenance and use of safety check lists prior to each flight an equivalent level of safety will be provided. 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft. Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides: No person may operate a U.S.

-registered civil aircraft
... (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 ofthis chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual , approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof. The UAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to it.

# . .

14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight Action. This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions bef ore flight to insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will n t be provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. The PIC will take all actions as stated in the FOM in Section 4 under Normal Procedures including but not limited to reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight. 14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight Instruction. Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully f unctioning ual controls. UAS and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully f unctional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training without fully f unctional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. The equivalent level of safety provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the size and speed ofthe aircraft. 14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes . Section 91
. 119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91
. 119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a UAS that is a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, or not more than 200 above an elevated platform from which filming is planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations
. As set forth herein, the UAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL with the exception that in circumstances where the UAS is used to survey or photograph a structure whose height exceeds 400 feet AGL, the UAS will not be operated more than 200 feet above the hi ghest point on the structure. It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre-obtained consent. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed ofthe UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission ofthe property owner or local officials
. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55lbs
. proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated withthese operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL. In addition, the low-altitude operations ofthe UAS will ensure separation between these UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119
. 14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings. This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set "
...to the elevation ofthe departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure." As the UAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the safety check list and live flight data monitoring, confirming the altitude ofthe launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions Section 9 1. 151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning "a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed

- (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes ." The battery powering the UAS provides approximately 30 minutes ofpowered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, UAS flights would be limited to approximately 10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS 's proposed flight area and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or twilight VFR conditions is reasonable. Applicant beli eve s that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope ofprior exemptions. Operating the UAS , in a tightly controlled area where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed, with less than 30 minutes ofreserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed ofthe small UAS. Additionally, limiting UAS fli ghts to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for which the exemption will be granted. Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 30 minutes or 25% of battery power- whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area.14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration The regulation provides in pertinent part : (a) Except as prov "ded in§ 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate
.... (b) No person may operate a ci vii aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by paragraph (a) ofthis section or a special flight authorization is sued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew. The UAS fully loaded weighs no more than 55 lbs. and is operated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents o to display them on the UAS. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to them, o the extent they are applicable to the UAS. 14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections. These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner " shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E ofthis part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) ofthis section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 ofthis chapter.
.. ," and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the UAS is very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restri cted areas for a limited period oftime. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. The operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will be performed in accordance with the UAS Manufacturer's User Manual. As provided in theFOM , the operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight and perform required maintenance needed
. Additional Information: The applicant, Scott J. Koch, is an experienced pilot with commercial instrument training on multi-engine rotor craft and is qualified on UH-60 and UH-1 aircraft. Scott J. Koch will serve as the primary pilot. Satisfaction of criteria provided in Section 333 ofthe Reform Act of 2012 provide more than adequate justification for the grant ofthe requested exemptions allowing the commercial operation ofthe applicant' s UAS.
For the foregoing reasons , an exemption is respectfully requested from the within cited regul ati ons .

Very truly yours,

# ~!:'- Soaring Photography, Inc. , Pres.