alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2885.21 How must I make rental payments for a linear grant or TUP? ( a ) *Term grants or TUPs.* For TUPs you must make a one-time nonrefundable payment for the term of the TUP. For grants, except those that have been issued in perpetuity, you must make either nonrefundable annual payments or a nonrefundable payment for more than 1 year, as follows: ( 1 ) *One-time payments.* You may pay in advance the total rent amount for the entire term of the grant or any remaining years.
( 2 ) *Multiple payments.* If you choose not to make a one-time payment, you must pay according to one of the following methods: ( i ) *Payments by individuals.* If your annual rent is $100 or less, you must pay at 10-year intervals not to exceed the term of the grant. If your annual rent is greater than $100, you may pay annually or at 10-year intervals, not to exceed the term of the grant. For example, if you have a grant with a remaining term of 30 years, you may pay in advance for 10 years, 20 years, or 30 years, but not any other multi-year period.
( ii ) *Payments by all others.* If your annual rent is $500 or less, you must pay rent at 10-year intervals, not to exceed the term of the grant. If your annual rent is greater than $500, you may pay annually or at 10-year intervals, not to exceed the term of the grant.
( b ) *Perpetual grants issued prior to November 16, 1973.* Except as provided by § 2885.22(a), you must make either nonrefundable annual payments or a nonrefundable payment for more than 1 year, as follows: ( 1 ) *Payments by individuals.* If your annual rent is $100 or less, you must pay at 10-year intervals, not to exceed 30 years. If your annual rent is greater than $100, you may pay annually or at 10-year intervals, not to exceed 30 years.
( 2 ) *Payments by all others.* If your annual rent is $500 or less, you must pay rent at 10-year intervals, not to exceed 30 years. If your annual rent is greater than $500, you may pay annually or at 10-year intervals, not to exceed 30 years.
( c ) *Proration of payments.* The BLM considers the first partial calendar year in the initial rental payment period (the length of time for which the holder is paying rent) to be the first year of the term. The BLM prorates the first year rental amount based on the number of months left in the calendar year after the effective date of the grant.
[73 FR 65074, Oct. 31, 2008]
### §1673. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–573, title IX, §901(4), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4591

Section, Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §803, formerly title VII, §703, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1413; renumbered title VIII, §803, Pub. L. 102–573, title VII, §701(a), (b), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4572, related to submission by Secretary to Congress of plan to implement provisions of this chapter.
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,  Peter  Sotola,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of  Pacific  Spirit,  Inc.,  for the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all  material  respects  the
financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Spirit, Inc.

Date:  July 7, 2004


                                                  /s/ Peter Sotola
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Peter Sotola
                                                  President, C.E.O. and Director
                                                  (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 2640.0-3 Authority.

Section 516 of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of September 3, 1982 (49 U.S.C. 2215).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 503

 543

 570

 577

 574

 549

 548

 535

 508

 501

 495

 506

 515

 518

 478

 481

 461

 481

 488

 491

 510

 501

 494

 485

 470

 465

 459

 466

 459

 447

 473

 482

 501

 548

 528

 522

 521

 478

 460

 474

 467

 480

 473

 458

 455

 412

 418

 432

 449

 458

 452

 464

 464

 443

 453

 428

 442

 449

 425

 430

 486

 494

 539

 560

 551

 538

 534

 503

 494

 486

 479

 498

 499

 482

 468

 433

 442

 460

 474

 472

 479

 483

 482

 463

 464

 448

 452

 458

 444

 442

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
| Signatures                       |   | Title                                        |
|----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/  Donald R. Kimble  |   | President and Director                       |
| Donald R. Kimble                 |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/  David S. Anderson |   | Vice President and Director                  |
| David S. Anderson                |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/ Timothy R. Barber            |   | Director                                     |
| Timothy R. Barber                |   |                                         |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/ Richard A. Cheap             |   | Director                                     |
| Richard A. Cheap                 |   |                                         |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/ Reginald D. Dickson          |   | Director                                     |
| Reginald D. Dickson              |   |                                         |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/ Edward J. Kane               |   | Director                                     |
| Edward J. Kane                   |   |                                         |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/ Roger E. Kephart             |   | Director                                     |
| Roger E. Kephart                 |   |                                         |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/ Thomas P. Reed               |   | Director                                     |
| Thomas P. Reed                   |   |                                         |
|                             |   |                                         |
| /s/ James D. Robbins             |   | Director                                     |
| James D. Robbins                 |   |                                         |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6706

DONALD JAMES HURLBERT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; GLEN KRAMER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (9:09-cv-01084-HMH)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 9, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald James Hurlbert, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Pendarvis 

McDonald, Sandra Jane Senn, SENN, MCDONALD & LEINBACK, LLC, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donald James Hurlbert appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Hurlbert v. City of North Charleston, No. 9:09-cv-01084-

HMH (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2010). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 01, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 01, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18I0160. TRACY MCCALL GUARINO et al. v. ZELDA ENTERPRISES, LLLP et al..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

1417049
#### § 10010.34 Incomplete or unavailable information.

The references to overall costs in 40 CFR 1502.22 of the CEQ regulations are not limited to market costs, but may also include other costs such as social costs due to delay.
#### § 30.404 How do I initiate a purchase at probate?

Any eligible purchaser may initiate a purchase at probate by submitting a written request to OHA to purchase at probate.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1476 

HIBAQ IBRAHIM MOHAMED,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A78-351-153)

Submitted: January 21, 2004 Decided: March 16, 2004

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hibaq Ibrahim Mohamed, Petitioner Pro Se. Allen Warren Hausman,

Judy L. Forrest, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Hibaq Ibrahim Mohamed, a native and citizen of Somalia,

petitions this court for review of an order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s

denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

Convention Against Torture. Mohamed contends that she provided

detailed, consistent and plausible testimony sufficient to support

her asylum claim. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158 (West 1999 & Supp. 2003);

8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A) (2000). We have reviewed the record, the

immigration judge’s decision, and the Board’s conclusion, and find

that substantial evidence supports the immigration judge’s ruling

that Mohamed failed to establish refugee status. 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252(b)(4) (2000). 

We conclude as well that Mohamed is not entitled to

withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) (2000), or under

the U.N. Convention Against Torture. The immigration judge did not

err in finding that Mohamed failed to show a “clear probability of

persecution.” See Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir.

2002) (“To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must

show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of

his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social

group, or political opinion.”). Nor did Mohamed establish that it

is “more likely than not” that she would face torture if she

returned to Somalia. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(c)(2) (2003) (to qualify
- 3 -

for protection under the Convention Against Torture, an alien must

show “it is more likely than not that he or she would be tortured

if removed to the proposed country of removal”).

We deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
#### § 3150.1 Suspension, revocation or cancellation.

The right to conduct exploration under notices of intent and oil and gas geophysical exploration permits may be revoked or suspended, after notice, by the authorized officer and upon a final administrative finding of a violation of any term or condition of the instrument, including, but not limited to, terms and conditions requiring compliance with regulations issued under Acts applicable to the public lands and applicable State air and water quality standards or implementation plans. The Secretary may order an immediate temporary suspension of activities authorized under a permit or other use authorization prior to a hearing or final administrative finding if he/she determines that such a suspension is necessary to protect health or safety or the environment. Further, where other applicable law contains specific provisions for suspension, revocation, or cancellation of a permit or other authorization to use, occupy, or develop the public lands, the specific provisions of such law shall prevail.
EXHIBIT
      3.1e





CERTIFICATE
      OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION


FOR
      NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATIONS


(Pursuant
      to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After issuance of Stock)





1.
      Name
      of corporation: Hybrid Technologies, Inc.





2.
      The
      articles have been amended as follows: Paragraph (a) Article III of the Articles
      of Incorporation of the corporation is deleted in its entirety and the following
      is substituted therefor:





" Article
      III





(a)
      The
      corporation shall have authority to issue a total of Two Hundred Fifty-Five
      Million (255,000,000) shares, of which Two Hundred Fifty Million (250,000,000)
      shares shall be Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Common Stock"),
      and Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $.001
      per share (the "Preferred Stock").”





3.
      The
      vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling
      them
      to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such greater proportion
      of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or
      series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation
      have voted in favor of the amendment is: a majority of the shares voted in
      favor
      of the amendment out of ________ shares outstanding and entitled to
      vote.





4.
                Officer Signature:
            /s/
                Holly Roseberry
            December
                24, 2007Holly
                Roseberry, President and Chief Executive
                Officer
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Visual Resource

Management Classes

Map 2-14

Alternative 1

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Class I - Preserve the Existing Character of the Landscape

Class II - Retain the Existing Character of the Landscape

Class III - Partially Retain the Existing Character of the Landscape

Class IV - Provide Activities that Require Major Modifications

to the Existing Character of the Landscape
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 4844] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of                               ( print page 58211)                            October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Comic Grotesque: Wit and Mockery in German Art, 1870-1940” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Neue Galerie New York, New York, New York, from on or about October 15, 2004 to on or about February 14, 2005, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr R. Sulzynsky, the Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State (telephone: (202) 619-5078). The address is: 301 4th Street, SW., (SA-44), Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: September 22, 2004. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs,  Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 04-21793 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21615]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES

Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment 
of Actuaries gives notice of a closed meeting of the Advisory Committee 
on Actuarial Examinations.

DATES: The meeting will be held on October 18, 2004, from 8:30 a.m. to 
5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Segal Company, 101 North 
Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, IL.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick W. McDonough, Executive 
Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, 202-622-
8225.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Advisory 
Committee on Actuarial Examinations will meet at the Segal Company, 101 
North Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, IL on Monday, October 18, 2004, 
from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions, 
which may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board 
examinations in actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology 
referred to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B).
    A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that the subject of the 
meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set 
forth in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest 
requires that such meeting be closed to public participation.

    Dated: September 20, 2004.
Patrick W. McDonough,
Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.
[FR Doc. 04-21615 Filed 9-24-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```
§ 2541.5 Publication; protests. ( a ) The applicant will be required to publish once a week for four consecutive weeks in accordance with § 1824.3 of this chapter, at his expense, in a designated newspaper and in a designated form, a notice allowing all persons claiming the land adversely to file in the office specified in § 2541.1-2(a) their objections to the issuance of patent under the application. A protestant must serve on the applicant a copy of the objections and furnish evidence of such service.
( b ) The applicant must file a statement of the publisher, accompanied by a copy of the notice published, showing that publication has been had for the required time.
§ 725.2 Purpose and applicability of this part. ( a ) This part sets forth the procedures to be followed and standards to be applied in filing, processing, adjudicating, and paying claims filed under part C of subchapter IV of the Act.
( b ) This part applies to all claims filed under part C of subchapter IV of the Act on or after June 30, 1982. Publication of certain provisions or parts of certain provisions that apply only to claims filed prior to June 30, 1982, or to claims subject to Section 435 of the Act, has been discontinued because those provisions affect an increasingly smaller number of claims. The version of Part 725 set forth in 20 CFR, parts 500 to end, edition revised as of April 1, 2010, applies to the adjudication of all claims filed prior to June 30, 1982, as appropriate.
( c ) The provisions of this part reflect revisions that became effective on January 19, 2001. This part applies to all claims filed after January 19, 2001 and all benefits payments made on such claims. With the exception of the following sections, this part also applies to the adjudication of claims that were pending on January 19, 2001 and all benefits payments made on such claims: §§ 725.101(a)(31), 725.204, 725.212(b), 725.213(c), 725.214(d), 725.219(d), 725.309, 725.310, 725.351, 725.360, 725.367, 725.406, 725.407, 725.408, 725.409, 725.410, 725.411, 725.412, 725.414, 725.415, 725.416, 725.417, 725.418, 725.421(b), 725.423, 725.454, 725.456, 725.457, 725.458, 725.459, 725.465, 725.491, 725.492, 725.493, 725.494, 725.495, 725.547, 725.701(e). The version of those sections set forth in 20 CFR, parts 500 to end, edition revised as of April 1, 1999, apply to the adjudications of claims that were pending on January 19, 2001. For purposes of construing the provisions of this section, a claim will be considered pending on January 19, 2001 if it was not finally denied more than one year prior to that date.
[78 FR 59117, Sept. 25, 2013]