alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1822.13 May I file electronically?

For certain types of applications, BLM will accept your electronic filing if an original signature is not required. If BLM requires your signature, you must file your application or document by delivery or by mailing. If you have any questions regarding which types of applications can be electronically filed, you should check with the BLM office where you intend to file your application. When you file an application electronically, it will not be considered filed until BLM receives it.
(No. 1064

Claim denied.)

#### Frank J. Heinl, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 19, 1927.*

Statute of *limitations*— when claim barred *by.*Where the declaration shows on its face that the cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations it will not be allowed.

John J. Reeve, for claimant

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

This claim is for $554.53 paid to the Peoria State Hospital for the support of William Cox while an insane patient at said hospital. Claimant was appointed conservator of Cox August, 24, 1903, by the county court of Morgan county, Cox having been adjudged insane prior to that time. The money was paid by claimant March 23, 1914. In April, 1917, the law under which this payment is alleged to have been made was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. This claim was filed July 2, 1926, more than nine years after that decision. The claim is not filed on behalf of Cox, nor by claimant in his official capacity as conservator, but on the theory that claimant will lose the money so. paid to the hospital unless he is reimbursed by the State.

The above facts all appear from the declaration. To this declaration the Attorney General has filed a demurrer. Section 10 of the act creating the Court of Claims provides that every claim against the State cognizable by the court shall be forever barred unless it is filed with the secretary of the court within five years after it first accrues. It appearing on the face of the declaration that this claim was not filed within the time required by the statute, the demurrer is sustained and the case dismissed.
§ 2569.413 How will I receive Notices and Decisions? ( a ) The BLM will provide all Notices and Decisions by Certified Mail with Return Receipt to your address of record.
( b ) Where these regulations specify that you must take a certain action within a certain number of days of receiving a notice or decision, the BLM will determine the date on which you received the notice or decision as follows: ( 1 ) If you sign the Return Receipt, the date on which you received the notice or decision will be the date on which you signed the Return Receipt.
( 2 ) If the notice or decision is returned as undelivered, or if you refuse to sign the Return Receipt, the BLM will make a second attempt by an alternative method. If the second attempt succeeds in delivering the notice or decision, the BLM will deem the notice or decision to have been received on the date when the notice or decision was delivered according to the mail tracking system.
( 3 ) If the notice or decision is returned as undelivered following the second attempt, the BLM may issue a decision rejecting your application.
( c ) You have a duty to keep your address up to date. If your mailing address or other contact information changes during the application process, please notify the BLM by mail at the address provided in § 2569.409(a), or by telephone at 907-271-5960, by fax at 907-271-3334, or by the email address provided in the received notice or decision. If you notify the BLM by mail, fax, or email, please prominently include the words “Change of Contact Information” in your correspondence.
( d ) Any responses to Notices or Decisions will be deemed received when it is physically received at the BLM Alaska State Office; if the response is mailed, on the date it was post-marked; or, if emailed, the date the email was sent.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of
December 31, 2009, and for the period then ended.

/s/ GLADE M. KNIGHT Glade M. Knight
Chief Executive Officer/s/ BRYAN PEERY Bryan Peery
Chief Financial OfficerMarch 5, 2010


---



QuickLinks
Order filed June 3, 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00100

- CR

____________ REGINA ROMERO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13

- 16232



### ORDER
Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant ’s counsel also has made known appellant’s desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Ande rs v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).
The record was made available to appellant on or about April 28, 2014. Accordingly, if appellant desires to file a pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief, a ny response is due on or before July 28, 2014.

PER CURIAM
### §5615. Effect of subchapter

#### (a) Liability

Subject to section 5614 of this title and this section, nothing in this subchapter or an Indian trust asset management plan approved under section 5613 of this title shall independently diminish, increase, create, or otherwise affect the liability of the United States or an Indian tribe participating in the project for any loss resulting from the management of an Indian trust asset under an Indian trust asset management plan.

#### (b) Deviation from standard practices

The United States shall not be liable to any party (including any Indian tribe) for any term of, or any loss resulting from the terms of, an Indian trust asset management plan that provides for management of a trust asset at a less-stringent standard than the Secretary would otherwise require or adhere to in absence of an Indian trust asset management plan.

#### (c) Effect of termination of plan

Subsection (b) applies to losses resulting from a transaction or activity described in that subsection even if the Indian trust asset management plan is terminated under section 5613(d) of this title or rescinded under section 5614(h) of this title.

#### (d) Effect on other laws

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in sections 5613 and 5614 of this title and subsection (e), nothing in this subchapter amends or otherwise affects the application of any treaty, statute, regulation, or Executive order that is applicable to Indian trust assets or the management or administration of Indian trust assets.

#### (2) Indian Self-Determination Act

Nothing in this subchapter limits or otherwise affects the authority of an Indian tribe, including an Indian tribe participating in the project, to enter into and carry out a contract, compact, or other agreement under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) 1 (including regulations).

#### (e) Separate approval

An Indian tribe may submit to the Secretary tribal regulations described in section 5614(b) of this title governing forest land management activities for review and approval under this subchapter if the Indian tribe does not submit or intend to submit an Indian trust asset management plan.

#### (f) Trust responsibility

Nothing in this subchapter enhances, diminishes, or otherwise affects the trust responsibility of the United States to Indian tribes or individual Indians.

(Pub. L. 114–178, title II, §206, June 22, 2016, 130 Stat. 439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (d)(2), is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which was classified principally to subchapter II (§450 et seq.) of chapter 14 of this title prior to editorial reclassification as chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

1 See References in Text note below.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 287

 256

 237

 279

 307

 334

 362

 411

 465

 541

 596

 602

 566

 529

 540

 549

 572

 574

 579

 584

 595

 603

 610

 619

 630

 648

 662

 670

 659

 677

 257

 237

 224

 235

 278

 306

 329

 354

 410

 452

 523

 571

 536

 520

 527

 539

 551

 568

 569

 574

 579

 586

 597

 606

 615

 629

 645

 651

 647

 657

 272

 248

 229

 255

 300

 314

 348

 390

 448

 495

 556

 595

 553

 524

 533

 545

 563

 572

 573

 578

 588

 597

 605

 613

 624

 639

 656

 663

 656

 667

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 3104.80 Termination of period of liability.

The authorized officer will not give consent to termination of the period of liability of any bond unless an acceptable replacement bond has been filed or until all the terms and conditions of the lease have been met.
§ 3192.10 What costs will BLM pay? ( a ) BLM will pay expenses allowed under part 12, subpart A, Administrative and Audit Requirements and Cost Principles for Assistance Programs, of this title.
( b ) BLM will fund the agreements up to 100 percent of allowable costs.
( c ) Funding is subject to the availability of BLM funds.
( d ) Funding for cooperative agreements is subject to the shared civil penalties requirement of § 3192.11.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.





This 31st
day of March, 2008.











/s/ Stephen D.
      Barnhill, M.D.Stephen
      D. Barnhill, M.D.Chief
      Executive Officer and Chairman
### §416f. Dedication of land for public purposes

Individual or tribal owners of trust or restricted Indian land on the San Xavier and Salt River Pima-Maricopa Reservations may, with the approval of the Secretary, dedicate land to the public for streets, alleys, or other public purposes under those laws of the State of Arizona that are applicable to the dedication of land for public purposes.

(Pub. L. 89–715, §7, Nov. 2, 1966, 80 Stat. 1113.)
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103894) pertaining to the Savings and Retirement Plan of American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. of our reports dated March 6, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of American
Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc., American Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of American
Pharmaceutical Partners, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLPChicago, IllinoisMarch 6, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,334.76

 2,334.48

 2,334.19

 2,333.87

 2,333.51

 2,333.11

 2,332.69

 2,332.32

 2,331.92

 2,331.52

 2,331.13

 2,330.75

 2,330.34

 2,329.95

 2,329.55

 2,329.09

 2,328.68

 2,328.30

 2,327.94

 2,327.44

 2,326.94

 2,326.46

 2,326.02

 2,325.54

 2,325.06

 2,324.57

 2,324.06

 2,323.56

 2,323.04

 2,322.58

 2,322.16

 1,911.7

 1,907.8

 1,903.7

 1,899.2

 1,894.2

 1,888.6

 1,882.7

 1,877.6

 1,872.0

 1,866.5

 1,861.1

 1,855.9

 1,850.2

 1,844.9

 1,839.4

 1,833.1

 1,827.5

 1,822.3

 1,817.4

 1,810.7

 1,803.9

 1,797.4

 1,791.5

 1,785.0

 1,778.5

 1,772.0

 1,765.2

 1,758.5

 1,751.6

 1,745.5

 1,739.9

STORAGE

-3.7

-3.9

-4.1

-4.5

-5.0

-5.6

-5.8

-5.1

-5.6

-5.5

-5.4

-5.2

-5.6

-5.4

-5.5

-6.3

-5.6

-5.2

-4.9

-6.8

-6.8

-6.5

-5.9

-6.5

-6.5

-6.6

-6.8

-6.7

-6.9

-6.1

-5.6

CHANGE

944

781

865

862

663

398

400

612

689

386

197

583

469

214

464

323

160

290

655

376

544

391

665

462

525

556

138

308

8

237

422

INFLOW

 2,662

 2,652

 2,803

 3,053

 3,080

 3,089

 3,216

 3,070

 3,379

 3,060

 2,801

 3,133

 3,223

 2,771

 3,123

 3,368

 2,859

 2,780

 3,010

 3,675

 3,847

 3,544

 3,558

 3,578

 3,652

 3,711

 3,445

 3,516

 3,364

 3,185

 3,122

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 124

 112

 115

 70

 119

 127

 131

 135

 110

 114

 114

 89

 89

 145

 101

 129

 120

 120

 116

 120

 115

 115

 103

 138

 126

 154

 134

 153

 137

 129

 109

C.F.S.

 .30

 .27

 .28

 .17

 .29

 .31

 .32

 .33

 .27

 .28

 .28

 .22

 .22

 .36

 .25

 .32

 .30

 .30

 .29

 .30

 .29

 .29

 .26

 .35

 .32

 .39

 .34

 .39

 .35

 .33

 .28

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 17, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -175.6 14,587 99,329 0 0 3,713 9.25 .00

ACRE-FEET -175,600 28,933 197,019 0 0 7,365

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 197,019

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 197,019

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2001 .00

 1,915.3

Table 4

(1) (1)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Petrocelli, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction unanimously modified by striking out the additional sentence imposed on defendant of fifteen days commitment to the city prison or workhouse, and as so modified affirmed. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 4732

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
MICHAEL RAFAEL BERKLEY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. M. Hannah Lauck , District Judge. ( 3:22

- cr - 00101

- MHL

- 1 )

Submitted : February 10, 2023 Decided: February 28, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Michael Rafael Berkley, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Arthur Garnett, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-4732 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Michael Raf ae l Berkley appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s order directing that Berkley be detained pending resolution of the crimi nal charges against him. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United
States v. Clark , 865 F.2d 1433, 1437 (4th Cir. 1989) (citing standard of review)

. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Berkley , No. 3:22

- cr - 00101

- MHL

- 1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 9, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* We have jurisdiction to review the district court’s order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See 18 U.S.C. § 3145(c). USCA4 Appeal: 22-4732 Doc: 10 Filed: 02/28/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,283.74

 2,283.57

 2,283.40

 2,283.14

 2,283.00

 2,282.69

 2,282.48

 2,282.41

 2,282.35

 2,282.16

 2,281.99

 2,281.84

 2,281.55

 2,281.38

 2,281.01

 2,280.75

 2,280.50

 2,280.24

 2,279.88

 2,279.63

 2,279.14

 2,278.63

 2,278.38

 2,278.10

 2,277.82

 2,277.54

 2,277.19

 2,276.94

 2,276.59

 2,276.16

 2,275.78

 1,278.9

 1,277.1

 1,275.3

 1,272.5

 1,271.0

 1,267.7

 1,265.5

 1,264.8

 1,264.1

 1,262.1

 1,260.3

 1,258.7

 1,255.7

 1,253.9

 1,250.0

 1,247.3

 1,244.7

 1,242.0

 1,238.2

 1,235.6

 1,230.5

 1,225.3

 1,222.7

 1,219.8

 1,216.9

 1,214.1

 1,210.5

 1,207.9

 1,204.4

 1,200.0

 1,196.1

STORAGE

-1.8

-1.8

-1.8

-2.8

-1.5

-3.3

-2.2

-0.7

-0.6

-2.0

-1.8

-1.6

-3.1

-1.8

-3.9

-2.7

-2.6

-2.7

-3.8

-2.6

-5.1

-5.3

-2.6

-2.9

-2.9

-2.9

-3.6

-2.6

-3.6

-4.4

-3.9

CHANGE

572

577

833

281

1,171

506

981

1,751

1,464

693

551

1,054

296

909

410

563

481

170

496

516

-936

-703

579

594

560

160

-93

462

287

408

345

INFLOW

 1,401

 1,425

 1,673

 1,591

 1,849

 2,092

 2,033

 2,060

 1,740

 1,639

 1,393

 1,791

 1,781

 1,699

 2,273

 1,861

 1,708

 1,441

 2,317

 1,777

 1,566

 1,885

 1,790

 1,976

 1,915

 1,497

 1,625

 1,652

 2,023

 2,525

 2,199

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 85

 66

 75

 88

 75

 69

 69

 65

 44

 68

 65

 59

 53

 111

 99

 71

 89

 98

 70

 46

 61

 67

 88

 73

 94

 109

 90

 99

 60

 90

 89

C.F.S.

 .27

 .21

 .24

 .28

 .24

 .22

 .22

 .21

 .14

 .22

 .21

 .19

 .17

 .36

 .32

 .23

 .29

 .32

 .23

 .15

 .20

 .22

 .29

 .24

 .31

 .36

 .30

 .33

 .20

 .30

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2014 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -84.9 15,938 56,197 0 0 2,385 7.77 .23

ACRE-FEET -84,900 31,613 111,467 0 0 4,731

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 111,467

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 111,467

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .23

JULY 1, 2013 17.59

 1,280.7

Table 4

(1) (1)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - [Policy Statement No. ANE-2002-33.15-R0]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability; policy statement. 

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces the availability of policy for 14 CFR 33.15, Materials.

# DATES:

The FAA issued policy statement number ANE-2002-33.15-R0 on January 21, 2004.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Tim Mouzakis, FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Staff, ANE-110, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:                         *timoleon.mouzakis@faa.gov*; telephone: (781) 238-7114; fax: (781) 238-7199. The policy statement is available on the Internet at the following address:                         *http://www.airweb.faa.gov/​rgl.*                         If you do not have access to the Internet, you may request a copy of the policy by contacting the individual listed in this section.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 16, 2003 (68 FR 35770) to announce the availability of the proposed policy and invite interested parties to comment.                

## Background

The FAA, in cooperation with industry, has developed a multi-faceted strategy to improve the safety of high-energy rotors. This strategy includes improving the ultrasonic (UT) billet inspection of titanium (Ti) alloys used in fan disks and other critical rotating engine hardware. This policy establishes minimum safety standards for the UT billet inspection of Ti material used in the manufacturing of engine rotating components. This policy does not create any new requirements.

Authority:49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44702, 44704.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 21, 2004.

Francis A. Favara,

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 04-2200 Filed 2-2-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M