alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NEWS RELEASE 

July 29, 2014 

Contact Senna Dodd at 404-256-4050 or benitadodd@georoiapolicy.org 

EPA Carbon Regulations 'Bad for Georgia,' Says Foundation President 

Atlanta - Kelly McCutchen, president and CEO of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, made the following 

remarks at to day's Stop the EPA Power Grab Rally organized by Americans for Prosperfty outside the Sam 

Nunn Federal Building in Atlanta. The Environmental Protection Agency is holding two days of hearings in 

Atlanta on its Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions. 

My name is Kelly McCutchen and I'm president of the Georgia Public Policy Foundation. We are a 

nonpartisan research organization that analyzes public policy. 

We have analyzed this public policy and have concluded that it is bad for Georgia. 

The EPA's stated goal was to reduce carbon emissions to limit the threat of global warming -or 

climate change- or whatever they are calling it today. 

But by the EPA's own admission, these regulations will NOT have a significant impact on global 

carbon emissions. 

One thing we do know -this WILL raise the cost of electricity. 

So we are raising the cost of living for everyone when so many people are struggling to pay their bills, 

and we're reducing our economic competitiveness - at a time when we need more economic growth 

and more jobs 

And we're asked - No, we're being told- to make great sacrifices in order to make a minimal impact 

on global carbon emissions with no assurances that other nations will follow us. 

We now know how this will end. Take a look at Australia, where they just repealed their carbon tax due 

to its negative toll on their economy. 

We don't need these regulations. For decades, American ingenuity has allowed us to keep up with 

growing energy demands and REDUCE pollution at the same time. Sadly now, instead of investing our 

scarce resources into research and development to fund breakthroughs in areas like energy storage, 

we will be wasting millions of dollars on regulatory compliance costs and higher energy prices. 

That is clearly a waste of 1 ,600 pieces of paper. 

Foundation Vice President Benita Dodd, who heads up the Foundation's Environmental Initiative, will testify 

Tuesday at 6:45p.m. at the EPA hearings, which were relocated from the Nunn federal Building to the Omni 

Hotel in Atlanta. 

About the Georgia Public Policy Foundation: Established in 1991, the Foundation is an independent, stalefocused think tank that proposes market-oriented approaches to public policy to improve the lives of Georgians. 

Regular events include Leadership Breakfasts and Policy Briefing Luncheons. Weekly publications are the Friday 

Facts and Friday Idea commentaries. Visit our Web site at georgiapolicy.org. Join The Forum at 

forum.georgiapolicy.orq. Like the Foundation's Facebook page at facebook.com/GeorqiaPolicy and follow us on 

Twitter at twitter.com/gppf. 

3200 Cohh Galleria Parkway • Suite 21-+ • Atlanta. GA 30339 • Phone: -+0-+-256-4050 • www.georgiapolicy.org
(No. 4559

#### Bankers and Shippers Insurance Company of New York, *Claimant,*vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May*11, 1954.

Saul A. Epton, Attorney for Claimant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; Marion G. Tiernan, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Fearer, J.

On July 16, 1953, a complaint was filed in this cause for the recovery of $924.26, representing an overpayment, through a clerical error by the claimant, of tax made to the Department of Insurance in accordance with the Illinois State Fire Marshal Tax Act. Ill. Rev. Stats., Chap. 1271⁄2, Sec. 16.

On November 30, 1953, a stipulation was entered into, which sets forth the facts relative to the overpayment made voluntarily by the claimant.

There is no statute covering overpayments voluntarily made to respondent, and no authorities have been cited, nor can we find any authority authorizing this Court to refund taxes voluntarily paid.

For the reasons assigned, an award to claimant must be, and is hereby denied.
#### § 1865.1-3 Action on application.

The authorized officer, upon review of the factual data and information submitted with the application, and upon a finding that an error was made in the patent or document of conveyance and that the requested relief is warranted and appropriate, shall give written notification to the applicant and make a reasonable effort to give written notification to any others known to have or believed to have or claim an interest in the lands that a corrected patent or document of conveyance shall be issued. The notification shall include a description of how the error is to be corrected or eliminated in the patent or document of conveyance. The notice shall require the applicant to surrender the original patent or other document of conveyance to be corrected. Where such original document is unavailable, a statement setting forth the reasons for its unavailability shall be submitted in lieu of the original document. The notice may include a requirement for quitclaiming to the United States the lands erroneously included, and shall specify any terms and conditions required for the quitclaim.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,743

 19,617

 18,770

 18,538

 17,945

 17,200

 15,708

 16,289

 16,751

 18,580

 18,627

 19,102

 20,082

 20,113

 18,863

 18,698

 19,200

 16,825

 14,390

 13,379

 14,137

 15,265

 15,045

 16,231

 19,087

 20,505

 20,291

 21,603

 20,182

 19,835

 19,678

 8,364

 8,521

 8,839

 8,606

 8,814

 8,258

 8,118

 7,768

 8,227

 9,700

 9,446

 8,883

 8,961

 8,222

 7,806

 7,721

 7,772

 7,736

 6,613

 5,912

 5,782

 6,131

 6,731

 7,308

 10,309

 9,230

 9,786

 9,744

 9,519

 9,297

 9,135

 13,389

 14,032

 13,913

 13,830

 13,898

 13,410

 12,498

 12,787

 12,778

 13,687

 13,591

 13,629

 13,853

 13,857

 13,149

 12,735

 13,377

 12,191

 10,882

 10,220

 10,468

 10,779

 10,725

 11,125

 13,564

 14,775

 14,767

 15,574

 14,787

 14,007

 13,927

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 830.22

 829.70

 829.13

 828.59

 828.08

 827.65

 827.20

 826.72

 826.20

 825.73

 825.20

 824.74

 824.45

 823.91

 823.35

 822.79

 822.22

 821.64

 821.08

 820.57

 819.99

 819.42

 818.89

 818.92

 818.73

 818.56

 818.37

 818.18

 817.92

 817.70

 37.45

 36.88

 36.26

 35.67

 35.13

 34.67

 34.20

 33.70

 33.16

 32.68

 32.14

 31.68

 31.39

 30.86

 30.31

 29.76

 29.21

 28.66

 28.13

 27.66

 27.13

 26.61

 26.13

 26.16

 25.99

 25.83

 25.67

 25.50

 25.27

 25.08

STORAGE

-0.69

-0.57

-0.62

-0.58

-0.55

-0.46

-0.47

-0.50

-0.54

-0.48

-0.54

-0.46

-0.29

-0.54

-0.55

-0.55

-0.55

-0.55

-0.53

-0.48

-0.53

-0.52

-0.48

+0.03

-0.17

-0.15

-0.17

-0.17

-0.23

-0.19

CHANGE

26

84

60

78

91

140

131

115

101

125

99

137

224

101

87

89

86

82

92

98

68

76

100

354

255

262

254

255

224

240

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 340

 340

 341

 340

 340

 340

 339

 339

 339

 339

 339

 338

 337

 337

 336

 336

 335

 334

 333

 333

 332

 332

 332

 331

 331

 331

 331

 331

 330

 330

OUTLET

 7

 7

 6

 6

 1

 4

 5

 4

 8

 4

 6

 7

 8

 9

 8

 8

 7

 6

 5

 4

 5

 6

 9

 9

 10

 7

 8

 9

 9

 7

C.F.S.

 .20

 .20

 .17

 .17

 .03

 .12

 .15

 .13

 .23

 .12

 .18

 .23

 .25

 .27

 .27

 .26

 .22

 .21

 .18

 .15

 .17

 .21

 .31

 .30

 .34

 .24

 .27

 .30

 .33

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

APRIL 2020 RUN DATE: 07/15/2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -13.08 4,134 10,066 450 199 6.46 .33

ACRE-FEET -13,080 8,200 19,966 893 395

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 893

OUTLET

TOTAL

 19,966

 20,859

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .33

JULY 1, 2019 7.64

 38.13

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 7.52
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Bench Corral

LaBarge/Deer Hills

Mesa/South Desert

Miller Mountain

Ryegrass

Webb Draw/Cora Butte

Wind River Front

Map 2-15

Fire Management Zones
§ 2809.10 Competitive process for energy development grants and leases. ( a ) The BLM may conduct a competitive process for solar and wind energy development grants or leases on its own initiative; or
( b ) The BLM may solicit nominations for public lands to be included in a competitive process by publishing a call for nominations under § 2809.11(a); or
( c ) You may request that the BLM conduct a competitive process by submitting a request in writing that complies with § 2809.11(b); or
( d ) The BLM may conduct a competitive process if it receives two or more competing applications.
( e ) Except where an applicant has failed to timely provide information requested by the BLM under § 2804.25(c), the BLM will not offer lands in a competitive process for which the BLM has accepted a complete application, received a Plan of Development, and entered into a cost recovery agreement.
[89 FR 35682, May 1, 2024]
§ 2932.57 Prohibited acts and penalties. ( a ) *Prohibited acts.* You must not— ( 1 ) Fail to obtain a Special Recreation Permit and pay the fees required by this subpart;
( 2 ) Violate the stipulations or conditions of a permit issued under this subpart;
( 3 ) Knowingly participate in an event or activity subject to the permit requirements of this subpart if BLM has not issued a permit;
( 4 ) Fail to post a copy of any commercial or competitive permit where all participants may read it;
( 5 ) Fail to show a copy of your Special Recreation Permit upon request by either a BLM employee or a participant in your activity.
( 6 ) Obstruct or impede pedestrians or vehicles, or harass visitors or other persons with physical contact while engaged in activities covered under a permit or other authorization; or
( 7 ) Refuse to leave or disperse, when directed to do so by a BLM law enforcement officer or State or local law enforcement officer, whether you have a required Special Recreation Permit or not.
( b ) *Penalties.* ( 1 ) If you are convicted of any act prohibited by paragraphs (a)(2) through (a)(7) of this section, or of failing to obtain a Special Recreation Permit under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, you may be subject to a sentence of a fine or imprisonment or both for a Class A misdemeanor in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 *et seq.* under the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1733(a)).
( 2 ) If you are convicted of failing to pay a fee required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section, you may be subject to a sentence of a fine not to exceed $100 for the first offense, or a sentence of a fine and or imprisonment for a Class A or B misdemeanor in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3571 and 3581 *et seq.* for all subsequent offenses.
( 3 ) You may also be subject to civil action for unauthorized use of the public lands or related waters and their resources, for violations of permit terms, conditions, or stipulations, or for uses beyond those allowed by permit.
[67 FR 61740, Oct. 1, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 7836, Feb. 21, 2007]
### §1833. Use of funds

Interest deposited, pursuant to section 1832(b)(2)(C) of this title, in the trust fund of any tribally controlled college or university may be periodically withdrawn and used, at the discretion of such college or university, to defray any expenses associated with the operation of such college or university, including expense of operations and maintenance, administration, academic and support personnel, community and student services programs, and technical assistance.

(Pub. L. 95–471, title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 98–192, §13, Dec. 1, 1983, 97 Stat. 1342; amended Pub. L. 105–244, title IX, §901(b)(5), (7), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1828.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–244 substituted "controlled college or university" for "controlled community college" and substituted "such college or university" for "such college" in two places.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–244 effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as a note under section 1001 of Title 20, Education.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 537

 465

 455

 452

 494

 536

 476

 509

 457

 425

 449

 468

 551

 545

 545

 529

 491

 481

 552

 568

 608

 647

 658

 624

 591

 670

 728

 794

 786

 605

 535

 456

 430

 419

 411

 425

 452

 418

 452

 404

 400

 370

 449

 438

 467

 513

 486

 428

 414

 482

 510

 542

 598

 575

 576

 516

 522

 663

 741

 568

 544

 479

 509

 449

 440

 431

 455

 504

 444

 476

 434

 412

 408

 462

 497

 496

 532

 504

 446

 442

 503

 538

 565

 624

 622

 599

 540

 573

 687

 774

 655

 585

 498

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 8,119

 8,266

 8,412

 8,500

 8,591

 8,896

 9,240

 9,590

 9,871

 10,120

 10,364

 10,658

 11,037

 11,421

 11,817

 12,179

 12,477

 12,737

 13,037

 13,357

 13,677

 14,015

 14,286

 14,480

 14,600

 14,733

 14,975

 15,285

 15,502

 15,606

 15,595

 271

 276

 280

 283

 286

 297

 308

 320

 329

 337

 345

 355

 368

 381

 394

 406

 416

 425

 435

 445

 456

 467

 476

 483

 487

 491

 499

 510

 517

 520

 520

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 489.32

 488.43

 487.51

 488.31

 489.07

 489.61

 489.07

 489.23

 489.57

 489.85

 489.29

 488.36

 487.83

 488.11

 488.39

 488.67

 488.93

 489.17

 489.44

 488.94

 488.03

 487.54

 487.94

 488.29

 488.67

 489.02

 488.57

 487.74

 487.55

 487.82

 488.19

 44,720

 43,917

 43,097

 43,809

 44,493

 44,983

 44,493

 44,638

 44,947

 45,202

 44,693

 43,854

 43,381

 43,630

 43,881

 44,133

 44,366

 44,584

 44,829

 44,375

 43,558

 43,124

 43,478

 43,791

 44,133

 44,447

 44,043

 43,301

 43,133

 43,372

 43,702

STORAGE

-18

-803

-820

+712

+684

+490

-490

+145

+309

+255

-509

-839

-473

+249

+251

+252

+233

+218

+245

-454

-817

-434

+354

+313

+342

+314

-404

-742

-168

+239

+330

CHANGE

407

9

-1

772

760

663

151

488

572

546

160

-10

174

539

540

541

531

524

533

173

-13

177

559

543

554

539

179

-1

276

480

526

INFLOW

 415

 413

 411

 411

 413

 415

 397

 414

 415

 416

 415

 413

 411

 411

 412

 413

 413

 413

 408

 400

 398

 395

 380

 384

 381

 380

 380

 372

 360

 359

 359

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 0

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/19/2001

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -1,036 11,891 12,377 0 0 37

ACRE-FEET -1,036 23,586 24,550 0 0 73

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 24,550

SPILL 0 24,550

 44,738

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 423

 0

 0

 875

 850

 2,110

 672

 344

 464

 528

 153

 0

 507

 521

 521

 521

 521

 521

 521

 157

 0

 511

 522

 522

 522

 508

 167

 0

 312

 543

 529

 14,345

 28,453

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
### SUBCHAPTER XXXVII–A—WYANDOTTE, PEORIA, OTTAWA, AND MODOC TRIBES OF OKLAHOMA: RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
§ 501.5 Oral argument. ( a ) *Oral argument.* Oral argument may be held in the discretion of the Board, on its own determination or on application by Appellant or the Director.
( b ) *Request.* A request for oral argument must be submitted in writing to the Clerk. The application must specify the issue(s) to be argued and provide a statement supporting the need for oral argument. The request must be made no later than 60 days after the filing of an appeal. Any appeal in which a request for oral argument is not granted by the Board will proceed to a decision based on the case record and any pleadings submitted.
( c ) *Notice of argument.* If a request for oral argument is granted, the Clerk will notify the Appellant and the Director at least 30 days prior to the date set for argument. The notice of oral argument will state the issues that the Board has determined will be heard and whether the oral argument will take place in person in Washington, DC or by videoconference.
( d ) *Time allowed.* Appellant and any Representative for the Director shall be allowed no more than 30 minutes to present oral argument. The Board may, in its discretion, extend the time allowed.
( e ) *Appearances.* An Appellant may appear at oral argument before the Board or designate a Representative. Argument shall be presented by the Appellant or a Representative, not both. The Director may be represented by an attorney with the Solicitor of Labor. Argument is limited to the evidence of record on appeal.
( f ) *Location.* Oral argument in person is heard before the Board only in Washington, DC. The Board may, in its discretion, hear oral argument by videoconference. The Board does not reimburse costs associated with an oral argument.
( g ) *Continuance.* Once oral argument has been scheduled by the Board, a continuance will not be granted except on a showing of good cause. Good cause may include extreme hardship or where attendance by an Appellant or Representative is mandated at a previously scheduled judicial proceeding. Any request for continuance must be received by the Board at least 15 days before the date scheduled for oral argument and be served by the requester upon Appellant and the Director. No request for a second continuance will be entertained by the Board. In such case, the appeal will proceed to a decision based on the case record. The Board may reschedule or cancel oral argument on its own motion at any time.
( h ) *Nonappearance.* The absence of an Appellant, his or her Representative, or the Director at the time and place set for oral argument will not delay the Board's resolution of an appeal. In such event, the Board may, in its discretion, reschedule oral argument, or cancel oral argument and treat the case as submitted on the case record.
[73 FR 62193, Oct. 20, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 1771, Jan. 11, 2021]
### §5129. Definitions

The term "Indian" as used in this Act shall include all persons of Indian descent who are members of any recognized Indian tribe now under Federal jurisdiction, and all persons who are descendants of such members who were, on June 1, 1934, residing within the present boundaries of any Indian reservation, and shall further include all other persons of one-half or more Indian blood. For the purposes of this Act, Eskimos and other aboriginal peoples of Alaska shall be considered Indians. The term "tribe" wherever used in this Act shall be construed to refer to any Indian tribe, organized band, pueblo, or the Indians residing on one reservation. The words "adult Indians" wherever used in this Act shall be construed to refer to Indians who have attained the age of twenty-one years.

(June 18, 1934, ch. 576, §19, 48 Stat. 988.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 18, 1934, ch. 576, 48 Stat. 984, popularly known as the Indian Reorganization Act, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5101 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 479 of this title prior to editorial reclassification and renumbering as this section.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Admission of Alaska as State

Admission of Alaska into the Union was accomplished Jan. 3, 1959, on issuance of Proc. No. 3269, Jan. 3, 1959, 24 F.R. 81, 73 Stat. c16, as required by sections 1 and 8(c) of Pub. L. 85–508, July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 339, set out as notes preceding section 21 of Title 48, Territories and Insular Possessions.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Charles Ray Miller, Appellant

No. 06

- 14

- 00124

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 1423721 ). Opinion delivered by J ustice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. W e note that the appellant, Charles Ray Miller, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 1 2, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1



|               |  |                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|EXHIBIT 32.1  |  | CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the
Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (the Issuer).

The
undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010
|                       | 
|By:                    |  | /s/ MARK P. MAYS       
|Name:                  |  | Mark P. Mays           
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer