alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §356. Allowance of undisputed claims of restricted allottees of Five Civilized Tribes

No undisputed claims to be paid from individual moneys of restricted allottees, or their heirs, or uncontested agricultural and mineral leases (excluding oil and gas leases) made by individual restricted Indian allottees, or their heirs, shall be forwarded to the Secretary of the Interior for approval, but all such undisputed claims or uncontested leases (except oil and gas leases) shall be paid, approved, rejected, or disapproved by the Superintendent for the Five Civilized Tribes of Oklahoma: Provided, however, That any party aggrieved by any decision or order of the Superintendent for the Five Civilized Tribes of Oklahoma may appeal from the same to the Secretary of the Interior within thirty days from the date of said decision or order.

(Feb. 14, 1920, ch. 75, §18, 41 Stat. 426.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

The clause "heretofore required to be approved under existing law by the Secretary of the Interior" after the words "but all such undisputed claims or uncontested leases (except oil and gas leases)" omitted from text as superfluous.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

mmm 

Martin, Michael (OST^ ^:(pj OPERATIONS 

Friday, January 07, 2011 4:42 PM 

'Dave French (kaadave@frontier.com)'; 'rajentzsch@mail.cityofpage.org'-

'dimbatt@cabieone.net'; 'Vardiman,Ben'; 'Kenny Patterson (jolea2y^sliiM*/l8\tez..^vf^ UM 

'jsaiem @ cityofkingman.gov' 

'Gulfstream, Mickey Bowman'; 'Great Lakes, Chuck Howell'; 'lenglish@seaportair.com'; 

'brad.rawson@skywest.com'; 'mmatthews@flygreatlakes.com'; Devany, Dennis (OST) 

EAS air carrier proposals at Kingman, Page, Prescott, and Show Low, AZ 

Great Lakes PGA PRC SOW IGM Bid as of 1-6-2011 .pdf; Gulfstream EAS Bid PGA PRC 

SOW IGM - Jan 2011 .pdf; SeaPort ShowLowFinal2011 .pdf; SkyWest PGA DOT Submission 

2011 .pdf 

Everyone: 

I would like to update you on the essential air service (EAS) situation at Kingman, Page, Prescott, and Show Low, and give 

you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary 

for Aviation and International Affairs. The current EAS contract at your community expires April 30, 2011, and in 

anticipation of that, we issued Order 2010-11-17, November 17, 2010, soliciting proposals from carriers interested in 

providing subsidized EAS for a new, two-year period, beginning May 1, 2011. In response to our request, four airlines 

submitted proposals: Great Lakes Aviation (the incumbent), Gulfstream International Airlines, SeaPort Airlines, and 

SkyWest Airlines. I have attached each carrier's proposal for your review. 

We request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have soon as possible, but no later than 

Thursday. February 3. Please send your comments via e-mail to EAS@dot.eov. If you have any questions, feel free to 

contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 502.07

 502.37

 503.21

 502.89

 501.90

 502.23

 503.46

 502.84

 502.98

 502.90

 502.89

 502.62

 502.13

 504.15

 503.93

 504.35

 504.33

 504.09

 504.24

 504.33

 504.30

 504.58

 504.16

 504.55

 504.88

 505.23

 505.00

 505.30

 505.08

 505.34

 57,568

 57,904

 58,849

 58,487

 57,380

 57,748

 59,134

 58,431

 58,588

 58,498

 58,487

 58,184

 57,636

 59,924

 59,670

 60,155

 60,132

 59,854

 60,028

 60,132

 60,097

 60,421

 59,935

 60,386

 60,768

 61,177

 60,907

 61,260

 61,001

 61,307

STORAGE

-650

+336

+945

-362

-1,107

+368

+1,386

-703

+157

-90

-11

-303

-548

+2,288

-254

+485

-23

-278

+174

+104

-35

+324

-486

+451

+382

+409

-270

+353

-259

+306

CHANGE

760

1,244

1,545

800

426

1,180

1,610

661

1,360

1,364

1,503

1,621

1,663

4,206

3,751

4,002

3,750

3,566

3,786

3,681

3,562

3,715

3,364

4,009

3,954

3,954

3,621

4,001

3,747

3,766

INFLOW

 1,084

 1,071

 1,064

 977

 984

 987

 905

 1,006

 1,272

 1,401

 1,498

 1,767

 1,931

 2,397

 2,494

 2,482

 2,495

 2,475

 2,494

 2,494

 2,494

 2,500

 2,504

 2,475

 2,504

 2,507

 2,505

 2,503

 2,500

 2,501

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 647

 1,375

 1,219

 1,167

 1,158

 1,111

 1,086

 1,044

 1,009

 1,023

 1,217

 1,099

 1,096

 1,133

 1,191

 1,267

 1,049

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 47

 90

 64

 83

 40

 32

 34

 75

 82

 142

 143

 113

 122

 101

 51

OUTLET

 4

 4

 5

 6

 0

 7

 6

 9

 9

 8

 11

 7

 8

 8

 10

 9

 10

 9

 10

 9

 10

 9

 7

 8

 16

 2

 6

 7

 10

 11

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 05/01/2014

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3,089 80,172 58,271 18,891 1,219 235

ACRE-FEET +3,089 159,021 115,581 37,470 2,418 466

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 115,581

SPILL 37,470 155,469

 58,218

OUTLET 2,418

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 720

 1,228

 1,504

 827

 429

 1,156

 1,604

 632

 1,283

 1,367

 1,516

 1,553

 1,676

 4,139

 3,640

 3,981

 3,694

 3,517

 3,782

 3,582

 3,506

 3,666

 3,312

 3,884

 3,858

 3,952

 3,538

 3,945

 3,714

 3,728

 78,933

 156,564

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
Exhibit 12.1
 Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
 Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc
 Year Ended December 31,(in thousands)
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Earnings:(Loss) income before taxes
    
    $
    (11,988
    )
    
    $
    260,779
    
    
    $
    317,876
    
    
    $
    345,550
    
    
    $
    314,865Add: Fixed charges, excluding
interest on deposits
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Earnings available for fixed charges,
excluding interest on deposits
    
    
    (11,988
    )
    
    
    260,779
    
    
    
    317,876
    
    
    
    345,550
    
    
    
    314,865Add: Interest on deposits
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Earnings available for fixed charges,
including interest on deposits
    
    $
    (11,988
    )
    
    $
    260,779
    
    
    $
    317,876
    
    
    $
    345,550
    
    
    $
    314,865Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends:Interest expense, excluding
interest on deposits
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Interest factor in net rental expense
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges, excluding
interest on deposits
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Add: Interest on deposits
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges, including
interest on deposits
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Preferred stock dividends
    
    
    16,195
    
    
    
    36,521
    
    
    
    49,643
    
    
    
    47,944
    
    
    
    34,634Combined fixed charges and
preferred stock dividends
    
    $
    16,195
    
    
    $
    36,521
    
    
    $
    49,643
    
    
    $
    47,944
    
    
    $
    34,634Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
and Preferred Stock Dividends
    
    
    (0.74
    )x
    
    
    7.14
    x
    
    
    6.40
    x
    
    
    7.21
    x
    
    
    9.09
    x
Personal communication with Andy McNeer, May 2009.

Aquapoint Sales Representative

Aquapoint manufactures the Bioclere onsite wastewater treatment system. The Bioclere system

uses a fixed film biological trickling filter and clarifier to remove organics and nutrients from

domestic wastewater. Installing the system to a new or existing conventional septic system on a

single family home will cost about $6,500. This cost doesn’t include the cost for the septic tank

and drain field that are already present with the existing system.
#### § 2806.56 Rent for support facilities authorized under separate grant(s).

If a solar energy development project includes separate right-of-way authorizations issued for support facilities only (administration building, groundwater wells, construction lay down and staging areas, surface water management and control structures, etc.) or linear right-of-way facilities (pipelines, roads, power lines, etc.), rent is determined using the Per Acre Rent Schedule for linear facilities (see § 2806.20(c)).

[81 FR 92217, Dec. 19, 2016]
#### § 100.304 Is the Department liable if it approves a transaction for Indian property based on an appraisal or valuation prepared by a qualified appraiser?

The Department is not liable for any deficient or inaccurate appraisal or valuation provided by the tribe or individual Indian that it did not review or approve, even if the Department approved a transaction for Indian property (including but not limited to a lease, grant, sale, or purchase) based on the appraisal or valuation.
### §39. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632

Section, R.S. §2063, related to compensation for extra services rendered by Indian Agents.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 667

 683

 725

 737

 730

 735

 731

 724

 733

 732

 698

 700

 688

 670

 711

 722

 702

 652

 683

 711

 714

 729

 753

 743

 738

 755

 729

 658

 595

 650

 676

 711

 708

 717

 694

 697

 655

 653

 613

 630

 647

 650

 666

 686

 640

 565

 637

 682

 675

 688

 724

 728

 682

 732

 630

 618

 651

 669

 698

 724

 718

 725

 720

 714

 718

 712

 671

 663

 675

 661

 693

 701

 663

 623

 665

 696

 695

 710

 743

 738

 727

 748

 689

 649

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
# C_2020189EN.01000601.xml

| 5.6.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/6

---

Information from the Commission concerning the non-application of certain provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698 by Austria

COVID-19 outbreak

(Regulation (EU) 2020/698 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 2020 laying down specific and temporary measures in view of the COVID-19 outbreak concerning the renewal or extension of certain certificates, licences and authorisations and the postponement of certain periodic checks and periodic training in certain areas of transport legislation (OJ L 165, 27.5.2020, p. 10))

(2020/C 189/06)

Notification by: Austria

In conformity with the relevant provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698, Austria informed the Commission on 3 June 2020 that it has decided not to apply certain provisions of the Regulation (EU) 2020/698.

Provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/698 that Austria has decided not to apply:

| — | Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(1) concerning the regular inspections of tachographs in road transport under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1);

| — | Article 4(2) concerning the renewal of driver cards under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(2) concerning the renewal of driver cards under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;

| — | Article 4(3) concerning the replacement of driver cards under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014; |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 4(3) concerning the replacement of driver cards under Regulation (EU) No 165/2014;

| — | Article 11(1) concerning the renewal of licences of train drivers under Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 11(1) concerning the renewal of licences of train drivers under Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (2);

| — | Article 11(2) concerning the completion of periodic checks of train drivers under Directive 2007/59/EC. |
| --- | --- |

—

Article 11(2) concerning the completion of periodic checks of train drivers under Directive 2007/59/EC.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 February 2014 on tachographs in road transport, repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 on recording equipment in road transport and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport (OJ L 60, 28.2.2014, p. 1).

(2)  Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the certification of train drivers operating locomotives and trains on the railway system in the Community (OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 51).

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 282

 268

 249

 244

 271

 268

 265

 246

 236

 233

 217

 219

 206

 201

 200

 220

 210

 209

 201

 153

 129

 121

 142

 154

 124

 103

 113

 118

 115

 112

 112

 263

 250

 238

 236

 245

 261

 246

 230

 225

 211

 209

 207

 196

 194

 196

 195

 196

 199

 153

 128

 119

 115

 121

 126

 103

 99

 102

 112

 109

 109

 109

 273

 263

 242

 240

 255

 265

 257

 236

 230

 221

 212

 213

 202

 196

 199

 206

 203

 204

 175

 139

 122

 117

 130

 143

 112

 101

 108

 115

 113

 110

 110

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
Exhibit 12

                              Greyhound Funding LLC
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Dollars in thousands)

<TABLE>
                                                                                                             Period from
                                                                                                             June 24, 1999
                                                                                                              (inception)
                                                   Three Months Ended                 Year ended                through
                                                        March 31,                    December 31,             December 31
                                                   2002           2001           2001            2000            1999

<S>                                           <C>             <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>
Earnings available to cover fixed charges:
Income before income taxes                    $      24,133   $      23,208  $      97,793  $      82,130   $      36,412
Plus: Fixed charges                                  12,262          42,122        115,722        172,764          71,776
Earnings available to cover fixed charges     $      36,395   $      65,330  $     213,515  $     254,894   $     108,188


Fixed charges:
Interest expense                              $      12,262   $      42,122  $     115,722  $     172,764   $      71,776
Total fixed charges                           $      12,262   $      42,122  $     115,722  $     172,764   $      71,776

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     2.97x          1.55x          1.85x           1.48x           1.51x
</TABLE>
§ 2610.0-8 Lands subject to application. ( a ) The lands shall be unreclaimed desert lands capable of producing ordinary agricultural crops by irrigation.
( b ) The lands shall be nonmineral, except that lands withdrawn, classified or valuable for coal, phosphate, nitrate, potash, sodium, sulphur, oil, gas or asphaltic minerals may be applied for subject to a reservation of such deposit, as explained in subpart 2093 of this title.
( c ) Lands embraced in mineral permits of leases, or in applications for such permits or leases, or classified, withdrawn or reported as valuable for any leasable mineral, or lying within the geologic structure of a field are subject to the provisions of §§ 2093.0-3 through 2093.0-7 of this title.
( d ) A project or individual entry may consist of 2 or more noncontiguous parcels. However, noncontiguous lands should be in a pattern compact enough to be managed as an efficient, economic unit.
### §1726. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §7, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1795, which related to the tribal organization of the Passamaquoddy Tribe, the Penobscot Nation, and the Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                        ANNUAL CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Greenwood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of San Jose International
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this annual report the conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on the most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of the most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of December 2003.

/s/ Christopher Greenwood
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
### §21. Repealed. June 12, 1948, ch. 450, §4, 62 Stat. 380

Section, act May 12, 1917, ch. 12, 40 Stat. 58, related to limitation on cost of Army hospital buildings.
Filed 1/8/15 Kwak v. Golden Crown Dental Lab CA2/5 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS 

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT 

DIVISION FIVE 

JOHN J. KWAK, 

 Plaintiff and Appellant, 

 v. 

GOLDEN CROWN DENTAL LAB, INC. 

et al., 

 Defendants and Respondents. 

 B253558 

 (Los Angeles County 

 Super. Ct. No. BC465932) 

 APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. 

Barbara A. Meiers, Judge. Dismissed. 

 Baird A. Brown for Plaintiff and Appellant. 

 Law Offices of Chanho C. Joo, Frank E. Marchetti and Chanho C. Joo for 

Defendants and Respondents. 

* * * * * * 
 Plaintiff and appellant John J. Kwak appeals from a trial court order sustaining the 

demurrer of defendants Glen Kim and Golden Crown Dental Lab, Inc. without leave to 

amend. It is elementary that “[a]n order sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend is 

not an appealable order; only a judgment entered on such an order can be appealed.” (I.J. 

Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. Jackson (1985) 40 Cal.3d 327, 331; Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1.) 

We recognize that appellate courts do frequently “save” such erroneous appeals by 

treating them as being from a subsequently entered judgment of dismissal. (See, e.g., 

Bame v. City of Del Mar (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 1346, 1353, fn. 5.) However, in the 

present case no judgment of dismissal has yet been entered. “[T]he ultimate 

responsibility rests with the appealing party; plaintiff could have requested the trial court 

to compel defendant to prepare the judgment or requested permission to prepare and file 

the judgment himself to perfect his appeal rights.” (Jordan v. Malone (1992) 5 

Cal.App.4th 18, 21.) 

 Because no appealable order or judgment has been entered in this case, the appeal 

is premature and, on this court’s own motion, the appeal is dismissed. 

DISPOSITION 

 The appeal is dismissed. 

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED 

 GOODMAN, J.

We concur: 

 MOSK, Acting P.J. 

 KRIEGLER, J. 

 



 Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to 

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.