alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 333-42858

Prudential Securities Secured Financing Corporation,  Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2001-C1
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

13-3411414
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

One New York Plaza, New York, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)

10292
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (212) 214-1000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]

This Amenment No. 1 on form 10-K/A amend Item 14 of the original Form 10-K
which was filed on March XX, 2002.


      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)	Report of Management on Compliance with Minimum Servicing
			Standards

		(99.3)	Annual Statement of Compliance

	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in
		order to provide statements for the monthly distributions to
		investors on September 12, 2001, October 23, 2001, November 21, 2001
		and December 20, 2001.






				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of Prudential
Securities Financing Corporation, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2001-C1
(Registrant)


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	June 19, 2002
#### § 2651.5 Conveyance reservations.

In addition to the conveyance reservations in § 2650.4 of this chapter, conveyances issued to village corporations shall provide for the transfer of the surface estates specified in section 14(c) of the Act, and shall be subject to valid existing rights under section 14(g) of the Act.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 284 280 282

2 285 264 279

3 263 227 249

4 224 187 207

5 197 164 187

6 165 162 163

7 172 162 165

8 215 173 192

9 262 217 237

10 0 0 0

11 321 298 306

12 344 321 336

13 378 346 362

14 396 382 389

15 408 394 399

16 416 403 411

17 411 385 401

18 384 362 371

19 367 356 363

20 356 346 351

21 350 344 347

22 350 341 345

23 350 338 344

24 352 325 337

25 335 324 330

26 331 303 319

27 329 301 313

28 315 301 308

29 327 308 316

30 323 287 313

31 358 325 343

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Union Island On Old River At Middle River 

Run Date: 4/14/2024

March 2024
Order entered May 29, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00658-CV

BARBARA WARD, ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS, Appellant

V.

PC VILLAGE APTS DALLAS LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-02044-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s emergency motion for stay. We DENY the motion.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 540.62

 541.12

 541.61

 541.90

 542.15

 542.37

 542.58

 542.80

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 542.98

 542.94

 542.90

 542.87

 542.83

 542.79

 542.76

 542.73

 542.40

 542.07

 541.69

 541.69

 541.66

 541.62

 541.59

 541.74

 541.97

 541.97

 1,997,672

 2,003,996

 2,010,200

 2,013,875

 2,017,045

 2,019,836

 2,022,501

 2,025,295

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,581

 2,027,073

 2,026,565

 2,026,184

 2,025,676

 2,025,168

 2,024,787

 2,024,406

 2,020,216

 2,016,030

 2,011,213

 2,011,213

 2,010,833

 2,010,326

 2,009,946

 2,011,847

 2,014,762

 2,014,762

STORAGE

+6,191

+6,324

+6,204

+3,675

+3,170

+2,791

+2,665

+2,794

+2,540

+0

+0

+0

+0

-254

-508

-508

-381

-508

-508

-381

-381

-4,190

-4,186

-4,817

+0

-380

-507

-380

+1,901

+2,915

+0

CHANGE

3,515

3,500

3,485

2,175

1,730

1,730

1,725

1,719

1,567

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,742

1,732

0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 355

 2,127

 2,120

 2,118

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 115

 105

 105

 115

 116

 145

 151

 149

 146

 117

 57

 5

 5

 103

 172

 164

 171

 158

 152

 158

 0

 323

 143

 147

 127

 129

 141

 135

 140

 280

 41

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-279

-207

-252

-207

-15

-177

-230

-161

-141

+117

+57

+5

+5

-25

-84

-92

-21

-98

-104

-34

+163

+337

+153

-163

+127

-63

-115

-57

-643

+18

+41

OR

 61

 53

 45

 49

 70

 53

 41

 41

 53

 62

 58

 65

 82

 62

 86

 107

 41

 53

 103

 62

 41

 53

 45

 74

 16

 45

 94

 103

 119

 78

 185

C.F.S.

 .15

 .13

 .11

 .12

 .17

 .13

 .10

 .10

 .13

 .15

 .14

 .15

 .20

 .15

 .21

 .26

 .10

 .13

 .25

 .15

 .10

 .13

 .11

 .18

 .04

 .11

 .23

 .25

 .29

 .19

 .45

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .25

 .22

 .00

 .25

 .01

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR June 16, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2017 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +23,281 24,620 6,720 4,015 0 -2,145 2,100 5.11 1.26

ACRE-FEET +23,281 48,834 13,329 7,964 0 -4,255 4,165

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 13,329

PACHECO TUNNEL 7,964 TOTAL 21,293

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2016 TO DATE = 15.22

 1,991,481

SPILL 0 1.26

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 15.22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 932

 892

 899

 822

 940

 930

 904

 840

 744

 768

 772

 759

 741

 732

 735

 751

 729

 754

 774

 798

 595

 433

 393

 377

 390

 383

 368

 371

 368

 375

 851

 848

 797

 756

 759

 903

 837

 736

 704

 710

 728

 727

 707

 699

 690

 698

 691

 725

 748

 633

 413

 388

 365

 356

 377

 354

 352

 358

 356

 359

 910

 872

 853

 793

 822

 914

 874

 799

 722

 732

 749

 741

 721

 707

 708

 722

 710

 734

 762

 760

 461

 406

 379

 367

 382

 368

 357

 366

 362

 368

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 10, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPrediction of Heat and Mass Transfer in a Rotating Ribbed Coolant Passage With a 180 Degree TurnNumerical results are presented for flow in a rotating internal passage with a 180 degree turn and ribbed walls. Reynolds numbers ranging from 5200 to 7900, and Rotation numbers of 0.0 and 0.24 were considered. The straight sections of the channel have a square cross section, with square ribs spaced one hydraulic diameter (D) apart on two opposite sides. The ribs have a height of 0.1D and are not staggered from one side to the other. The full three dimensional Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes equations are solved combined with the Wilcox k-omega turbulence model. By solving an additional equation for mass transfer, it is possible to isolate the effect of buoyancy in the presence of rotation. That is, heat transfer induced buoyancy effects can be eliminated as in naphthalene sublimation experiments. Heat transfer, mass transfer and flow field results are presented with favorable agreement with available experimental data. It is shown that numerically predicting the reattachment between ribs is essential to achieving an accurate prediction of heat/mass transfer. For the low Reynolds numbers considered, the standard turbulence model did not produce reattachment between ribs. By modifying the wall boundary condition on omega, the turbulent specific dissipation rate, much better agreement with the flow structure and heat/ mass transfer was achieved. It is beyond the scope of the present work to make a general recommendation on the omega wall boundary condition. However, the present results suggest that the omega boundary condition should take into account the proximity to abrupt changes in geometry.Document ID19990019396Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRigby, David L.*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1999Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberE-11300NAS 1.15:208501NASA/TM-1999-208501Meeting InformationMeeting: Gas Turbine and Aeroengine CongressLocation: StockholmCountry: SwedenStart Date: June 2, 1998End Date: June 5, 1998Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-26-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990019396.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 347

 351

 359

 346

 346

 359

 357

 348

 343

 327

 322

 325

 306

 320

 309

 323

 316

 305

 311

 307

 304

 295

 301

 307

 305

 323

 318

 319

 320

 332

 325

 325

 322

 318

 315

 312

 309

 306

 303

 300

 297

 295

 291

 290

 290

 287

 283

 279

 277

 278

 278

 277

 277

 277

 281

 286

 291

 298

 302

 309

 335

 334

 335

 328

 327

 328

 323

 319

 314

 309

 305

 302

 297

 299

 299

 298

 294

 288

 287

 288

 286

 285

 284

 286

 288

 296

 300

 305

 310

 319

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 19, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
§ 702.142 Commutation of payments; aliens not residents or about to become nonresidents. ( a ) Pursuant to section 9(g) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 909(g), compensation paid to aliens not residents, or about to become nonresidents, of the United States or Canada shall be in the same amount as provided for residents except that dependents in any foreign country shall be limited to surviving spouse and child or children, or if there be no surviving spouse or child or children, to surviving father or mother whom the employee has supported, either wholly or in part, for the period of 1 year prior to the date of injury, and except that the Director, OWCP, may, at his option, or upon the application of the insurance carrier he shall, commute all future installments of compensation to be paid to such aliens by paying or causing to be paid to them one-half of the commuted amount of such future installments of compensation as determined by the Director.
( b ) Applications for commutation under this section shall be made in writing to the district director having jurisdiction, and forwarded by the district director to the Director, for final action.
( c ) Applications for commutations shall be made effective, if approved by the Director, on the date received by the district director, or on a later date if shown to be appropriate on the application.
( d ) Commutations shall not be made with respect to a person journeying abroad for a visit who has previously declared an intention to return and has stated a time for returning, nor shall any commutation be made except upon the basis of a compensation order fixing the right of the beneficiary to compensation.
[50 FR 394, Jan. 3, 1985]
### §1772a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–228, §3, Dec. 31, 1987, 101 Stat. 1557, which set out definitions for this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
* Pursuant to 5TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 24, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20067 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus NOE MONDRAGON-JIMENEZ, also known as Noe Jiminez Mondragon, also known as Noe Jimenez Mondragon, also known as Noe Mondragon, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-325-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Noe Mondragon-Jimenez (Mondragon) appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being unlawfully present in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Mondragon argues for the first time on appeal that the district court misapplied the Sentencing Guidelines by characterizing his state felony convictions for possession of a controlled substance as aggravated felonies for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C). Mondragon’s argument is unavailing inNo. 06-20067 -2- light of circuit precedent. See United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 1997). Mondragon argues that this circuit’s precedent is inconsistent with Jerome v. United States , 318 U.S. 101 (1943). Having preceded Hinojosa-Lopez , Jerome is not “an intervening Supreme Court case explicitly or implicitly overruling that prior precedent.” See United States v. Short , 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999). For the first time on appeal, Mondragon also challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b) in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). The Government argues that Mondragon lacks standing to bring a facial challenge to the constitutionality of § 1326(b). Because Mondragon may be entitled to a lesser sentence if his constitutional challenge were successful, he has standing.
See Henderson v. Stalder , 287 F.3d 374, 380 (5th Cir. 2002). Mondragon cannot succeed on his constitutional challenge, however, because his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Mondragon contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Mondragon properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres andNo. 06-20067 -3- circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1600

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-12, the Bureau of Land Management removed all amendments to part 1600 made effective on Jan. 11, 2017, at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016.

#### § 1610.4-8 Selection of resource management plan.

After publication of the draft resource management plan and draft environmental impact statement, the Field Manager shall evaluate the comments received and select and recommend to the State Director, for supervisory review and publication, a proposed resource management plan and final environmental impact statement. After supervisory review of the proposed resource management plan, the State Director shall publish the plan and file the related environmental impact statement.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 70 FR 14567, Mar. 23, 2005; 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
#### § 2866.41 How will the BLM calculate rent for communications facilities ancillary to a linear grant or other use authorization?

When a communications facility is authorized as ancillary to (*i.e.,* used for the sole purpose of internal communications) a grant or some other type of use authorization (*e.g.,* a mineral lease or sundry notice), the BLM will determine the rent using the linear rent schedule (see § 2866.20) or rent scheme associated with the other authorization, and not the communications uses rent schedule.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4426 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify rules relating to 

beneficiaries of charitable remainder trusts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2022 

Mr. YOUNG (for himself and Ms. HASSAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

rules relating to beneficiaries of charitable remainder trusts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Needs Trust 

5 Improvement Act of 2022’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4426 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CHARITABLE REMAINDER BENE2 FICIARIES IN APPLICABLE MULTI-BENE3 FICIARY TRUSTS UNDER DEFINED CON4 TRIBUTION PLAN DISTRIBUTION RULES 

5 AFTER DEATH OF EMPLOYEE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 401(a)(9)(H)(iv)(II) of 

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

8 ‘‘no individual’’ and inserting ‘‘no beneficiary’’. 

9 (b) APPLICABLE MULTI-BENEFICIARY TRUST DEFI10 NITION.—Section 401(a)(9)(H)(v) of the Internal Rev11 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

12 following flush text: 

13 ‘‘For purposes of the preceding sentence, 

14 in the case of a trust the terms of which 

15 are described in clause (iv)(II), any bene16 ficiary which is an organization described 

17 in section 408(d)(8)(B)(i) shall be treated 

18 as a designated beneficiary described in 

19 subclause (II).’’. 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

21 this section shall take effect as if included in section 401 

22 of the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement En23 hancement Act of 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 183

 183

 184

 183

 169

 158

 173

 179

 173

 159

 145

 158

 158

 157

 161

 164

 166

 163

 159

 150

 146

 144

 137

 131

 129

 131

 129

 127

 125

 126

 162

 161

 178

 169

 158

 136

 136

 172

 158

 138

 135

 144

 153

 152

 154

 159

 162

 158

 149

 141

 141

 136

 130

 127

 126

 123

 125

 121

 120

 122

 173

 175

 181

 177

 164

 147

 151

 175

 165

 150

 138

 152

 156

 154

 158

 162

 164

 161

 153

 144

 144

 140

 134

 129

 128

 126

 127

 123

 122

 124

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6952

RICHARD CLAUDE NODINE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden ACI; D.R. FREDERICK,

Director of the South Carolina Department of

Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, South Carolina

Attorney General,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-01-1962-9-23)

Submitted: August 15, 2002 Decided: August 26, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard Claude Nodine, Appellant Pro Se. Derrick K. McFarland,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Richard Claude Nodine seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See Nodine v. Miro, No. CR-01-1962-9-23 (D.S.C. May

24, 2002). We also deny Nodine’s motion for authorization to file

a second or successive application for post-conviction relief in

South Carolina courts. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED