alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 4605 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 615 6th 

Avenue SE in Cedar Rapids, Iowa as the ‘‘Sgt. 1st Class Terryl L. Pasker Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SGT. 1ST CLASS TERRYL L. PASKER POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 615 6th Avenue SE in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. 1st Class Terryl L. 

Pasker Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sgt. 1st Class Terryl L. Pasker Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 802.105 Stay of payment pending appeal. ( a ) As provided in section 14(f) of the LHWCA and sections 415 and 422 of the Black Lung Benefits Act, the payment of the amounts required by an award of compensation or benefits shall not be stayed or in any way delayed beyond ten days after it becomes due pending final decision in any proceeding before the Board unless so ordered by the Board. No stay shall be issued unless irreparable injury would otherwise ensue to the employer, coal mine operator or insurance carrier. Any order of the Board permitting any stay shall contain a specific finding, based upon evidence submitted to the Board and identified by reference thereto, that irreparable injury would result to such employer, operator or insurance carrier, and specify the nature and extent of the injury.
( b ) When circumstances require, the Board, in its discretion, may issue a temporary order not to exceed 30 days granting a motion for stay of payment prior to the expiration of the ten-day period allowed for filing responses to motions pursuant to § 802.219(e). Following receipt of a response to the motion or expiration of the response time provided in § 802.219(e), the Board will issue a subsequent order ruling on the motion for stay of payment.
[52 FR 27292, July 20, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 16519, May 9, 1988]
### SERVED : JANUAR Y 5 , 201 2 U.S . DEPARTMEN T OFTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C n n •.,. . , I N TH E MATTERO F FLYIN GHIGH , LLC FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-2011-129 2 NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofore designate da s Cas e No . 201 1 WP070116 ) ha s bee n assigne d to Administrativ e La

w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . All futur e pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l be serve don th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , andth e othe r

person s on th e attache dServic e List .

>nni e A . Yoder Chie f Administrativ e LaW^Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDMSNo . FAA-20 1 M29 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington . D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Sea n Benjami n Cooke , Manage r Flyin g High , LLC , Respondent ' 330 9 E . Milk y Wa y Gilbert , A Z 8529 5 TEL : 480-252-002 1 FAX : 877-849-002 1 Ada mRunkel , Complainan t '. v Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi e Region , AWP-7.1 2 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O
. Box9200 7 Lo s Angelej; , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-714 2 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e OfHc e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier, use th

e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2WI000 , Washington , b e 20591 ; Anention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .

- 2 -
#### § 30.202 What will happen when OHA receives the summary probate file?

When OHA receives a summary probate file from BIA under 25 CFR 15.202(b), OHA will determine the distribution of the estate based on the information included in the probate file and issue a summary probate decision directing distribution of the estate.
§ 725.363 Qualification of representative. ( a ) *Attorney.* Any attorney in good standing who is admitted to practice before a court of a State, territory, district, or insular possession, or before the Supreme Court of the United States or other Federal court and is not, pursuant to any provision of law, prohibited from acting as a representative, may be appointed as a representative.
( b ) *Other person.* With the approval of the adjudication officer, any other person may be appointed as a representative so long as that person is not, pursuant to any provision of law, prohibited from acting as a representative.
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.**§ **1350)**     The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of ARRIS Group, Inc., certifies that to thebest of his knowledge the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, whichaccompanies this certification, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the annual report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ARRIS Group, Inc. atthe dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any otherpurpose.     Dated this 28th day of February, 2007.                                                                 /s/ DAVID B. POTTS   David B. Potts   Executive Vice President,
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 488.57

 488.96

 489.33

 489.35

 488.54

 488.10

 488.47

 488.64

 487.91

 487.57

 487.85

 488.40

 488.13

 487.47

 488.37

 488.84

 488.14

 487.35

 488.74

 490.16

 492.78

 494.09

 495.23

 496.83

 496.67

 497.53

 498.12

 498.42

 499.23

 500.76

 500.21

 44,043

 44,393

 44,729

 44,747

 44,016

 43,621

 43,953

 44,106

 43,451

 43,150

 43,398

 43,890

 43,648

 43,062

 43,863

 44,285

 43,657

 42,956

 44,196

 45,486

 47,952

 49,225

 50,355

 51,976

 51,812

 52,698

 53,311

 53,626

 54,481

 56,127

 55,531

STORAGE

+341

+350

+336

+18

-731

-395

+332

+153

-655

-301

+248

+492

-242

-586

+801

+422

-628

-701

+1,240

+1,290

+2,466

+1,273

+1,130

+1,621

-164

+886

+613

+315

+855

+1,646

-596

CHANGE

535

536

526

366

-7

161

528

428

22

168

445

560

186

11

710

518

16

-9

958

971

1,570

970

902

1,139

235

746

597

474

736

1,138

-8

INFLOW

 362

 358

 356

 355

 361

 359

 360

 350

 351

 320

 316

 312

 306

 305

 305

 304

 332

 344

 332

 320

 326

 327

 329

 319

 315

 297

 287

 314

 304

 306

 290

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 4

 0

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 3

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/13/2001

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +11,829 16,128 10,122 0 0 43

ACRE-FEET +11,829 31,990 20,077 0 0 85

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 20,077

SPILL 0 20,077

 43,702

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 543

 529

 523

 339

 128

 172

 505

 340

 0

 97

 370

 522

 180

 0

 687

 502

 0

 0

 970

 1,568

 895

 939

 863

 809

 57

 582

 547

 385

 1,051

 708

 0

 14,811

 29,378

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
#### § 2462.3 Administrative review.

For a period of 30 days after publication in the Federal Register of a notice of classification for disposal, the classification shall be subject to the exercise of supervisory authority by the Secretary of the Interior for the purpose of administrative review. If, 30 days from date of publication, the Secretary has neither on his own motion, on motion of any protestant or the State Director exercised supervisory authority for review, the classification shall become the final order of the Secretary. The exercise of supervisory authority by the Secretary shall automatically vacate the classification and reinstate the proposed classification together with its segregative effect. In this event the final departmental decision shall be issued by the Secretary and published in the Federal Register.
§ 2201.1-3 Assumption of costs. ( a ) Generally, parties to an exchange will bear their own costs of the exchange. However, if the authorized officer finds it is in the public interest, subject to the conditions and limitations specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, an agreement to initiate an exchange may provide that: ( 1 ) One or more of the parties may assume, without compensation, all or part of the costs or other responsibilities or requirements that the authorized officer determines would ordinarily be borne by the other parties; or
( 2 ) The parties may agree to make adjustments to the relative values involved in an exchange transaction in order to compensate parties for assuming costs or other responsibilities or requirements that the authorized officer determines would ordinarily be borne by the other parties. These costs or services may include but are not limited to: Land surveys, appraisals, mineral examinations, timber cruises, title searches, title curative actions, cultural resource surveys and mitigation, hazardous substance surveys and controls, removal of encumbrances, arbitration including all fees, bargaining, cure of deficiencies preventing highest and best use of the land, conduct of public hearings, assemblage of non-Federal parcels from multiple ownerships, expenses of complying with laws, regulations, and policies applicable to exchange transactions, and expenses that are necessary to bring the Federal and non-Federal lands involved in the exchange to their highest and best use for appraisal and exchange purposes.
( b ) The authorized officer may agree to assume without compensation costs ordinarily borne under local custom or practice by the non-Federal party or to compensate the non-Federal party for costs ordinarily borne under local custom or practice by the United States but incurred by the non-Federal party, but only when it is clearly in the public interest and the authorized officer determines and documents that each of the following circumstances exist: ( 1 ) The amount of the cost assumed or compensation is reasonable and accurately reflects the value of the goods and services received;
( 2 ) The proposed exchange is a high priority of the agency;
( 3 ) The land exchange must be expedited to protect important Federal resource values, such as congressionally designated areas or endangered species habitat;
( 4 ) Cash equalization funds are available for compensating the non-Federal party; and
( 5 ) There are no other practicable means available to the authorized officer of meeting Federal exchange processing costs, responsibilities, or requirements.
( c ) The total amount of adjustment agreed to as compensation for costs incurred pursuant to this section shall not exceed the limitations set forth in § 2201.6 of this part.
Table 21
                                         U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                                 Central Valley Operations Office

                                                 Central Valley Project - California
Monthly Diversions in AF                                   2010

                             Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr     May     Jun     Jul     Aug     Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec    Total

CANALS
Contra Costa                 3050    7718    9405       0    7635   14876   14647    5515     743    2957    4530     947    72023
Delta-Mendota               98598  208206  204367   48320   76184  184535  253706  254404  242517  253158  244352  249077  2317424
Actual Fed Dos Amigos        7298   12050   27296   40012   92627  162098  165115  108609   63470   50274   36777   25967   791593
Madera                          0       0    3112   31478   56680   59505   58668   50385   23620   15281       0    4864   303593
Friant-Kern                 17681   34862   35372  146571  261388  185281  197211  191582  102222   71251   21868       0  1265289
Corning                         0     105      99     244    1426    3118    4151    3683    2499    1371       0       0    16696
Folsom-South                 1525    1674    2009    2218    2279    2668    2672    2224    2787    2686    1948    1299    25989
Tehama-Colusa                   0       0    5931    6171   31500   39019   58370   38829   15955    6986       0       0   202761

CACHUMA PROJECT
Tecolete Tunnel              1549    1192    1686    1845    2593    2840    2961    3133    2977    2086    2018    1537    26417

ORLAND PROJECT
Stony Creek                     0       0       0       0   11485   15516   17643   16645   13629    7678     276       0    82872
North Canal                     0       0       0       0    3406    4750    5230    5149    3773    2160      36       0    24504
South Canal                     0       0       0       0    8079   10766   12407   11496    9856    5518     240       0    58362

SOLANO PROJECT
Putah South Canal            3687    3318    4288    7291   21007   32708   39345   31155   21104    9305    1712    2938   177858


NA = Not Available at time of printing report.
#### § 2611.1-1 Applications for determination of suitability and availability of lands.

The first step in obtaining segregation of lands for Carey Act development shall be the filing of an application in the appropriate State office of the Bureau of Land Management requesting that the authorized officer make a determination regarding the suitability and availability of lands for a Carey Act Project. The application shall consist of a map of lands proposed to be reclaimed, containing sufficient detail to clearly show which lands are included in the Project, the mode of irrigation and the source of water. The map shall bear a certification by the State official authorized to file the application that the lands are applied for subject to the provisions of subpart 2093 of this title.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12** 
**- 7056** 

HELMAR CHRISTOPHER OLSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BOBBY TAYLOR, Correctional Officer, Mountain View Correctional Institution; MARL FOSTER, Correctional Officer, Mountain View Correctional Institution; JAY MOODY, Correctional Captain, Mountain View Correctional Institution; MIKE SLAGLE, Asst. Superintendent for Programs, Mountain View Correctional Institution; MARGIE LAWLER, Asst. Superintendent for Custody and Op erations, Mountain View Correctional Institution; SUSAN WHITE, Superintendent/ Mountain View Correctional Institution ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. R obert J. Conrad, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv
- 00160

- RJC )

Submitted : September 11 , 2012 Decided: September 14, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Helmar Christopher Olson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Helmar Christopher Olson appeals the district court ’ s
order s denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint , denying his motion to reconsider, and denying his motion to

transfer venue . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Olson v. Taylor , No. 1:11

- cv
- 00160

- RJC
(W.D.N.C. May 24 & June 7, 2012) . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 687.150 What are the requirements for submitting applications for National Dislocated Worker Grants?

The Department will publish guidance on the requirements for submitting applications for DWGs. Requirements may vary depending on the DWG. A project implementation plan must be submitted after receiving the DWG award, unless otherwise specified.
#### § 2533.1 Application.

An Indian who desires to apply for an allotment within a national forest under this act must submit the application to the supervisor of the particular forest affected, by whom it will be forwarded with appropriate report, through the district forester and Chief, Forest Service, to the Secretary of Agriculture, in order that he may determine whether the land applied for is more valuable for agriculture or grazing than for the timber found thereon.
§ 663.630 How does a displaced homemaker qualify for services under title I? Displaced homemakers may be eligible to receive assistance under title I in a variety of ways, including: ( a ) Core services provided by the One-Stop partners through the One-Stop delivery system;
( b ) Intensive or training services for which an individual qualifies as a dislocated worker/displaced homemaker if the requirements of this part are met;
( c ) Intensive or training services for which an individual is eligible if the requirements of this part are met;
( d ) Statewide employment and training projects conducted with reserve funds for innovative programs for displaced homemakers, as described in 20 CFR 665.210(f).
§ 2627.1 Grant for community purposes. ( a ) *Authority.* The Act of July 7, 1958 (72 Stat. 339, 340), grants to the State of Alaska the right to select, within 25 years after January 3, 1959, not to exceed 400,000 acres of national forest lands in Alaska which are vacant and unappropriated at the time of their selection and not to exceed 400,000 acres of other public lands in Alaska which are vacant, unappropriated, and unreserved at the time of their selection. The act provides that the selected lands must be adjacent to the established communities or suitable for prospective community centers and recreational areas. The act further provides that such lands shall be selected with the approval of the Secretary of Agriculture as to national forest lands and with the approval of the Secretary of the Interior as to other lands, and that no selection shall be made north and west of the line described in section 10 of the act without approval of the President or his designated representative.
( b ) *Applicable regulations.* Unless otherwise indicated therein, the regulations in § 2627.3 (a) to (d) apply to the grant and selection of lands for community purposes. In addition to the requirements of § 2627.3(c), where the selected lands are national forest, the application for selection must be accompanied by a statement of the Secretary of Agriculture or his delegate showing that he approves the selection.
( c ) *Approval of selections outside of national forests.* Selection of lands outside of national forests will be approved by the authorized officer of the Bureau of Land Management if, all else being regular, he finds that approval of a selection of lands adjacent to an established community will further expansion of an established community, or if the lands are suitable for prospective community centers and recreational areas.
Exhibit 32.2
           Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries
            Certification Of Chief Financial  Officer
    Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
          Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Randy Turner, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Form 10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Date: November 21, 2005

/s/ Randy Turner
--------------------------
Randy Turner
Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00401

- CV

IN RE ILLINOIS UNION

INSURANCE COMPANY RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MCCOY, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: January 17, 2012

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
§ 683.500 What is a Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Pay-for-Performance contract strategy? ( a ) A WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract strategy is a specific type of performance-based contract strategy that has four distinct characteristics: ( 1 ) It is a strategy to use WIOA Pay-for-Performance contracts as they are described in § 683.510;
( 2 ) It must include the identification of the workforce development problem and target populations for which a local area will pursue a WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract strategy; the outcomes the local area would hope to achieve through a Pay-for-Performance contract relative to baseline performance; and the acceptable cost to government associated with achieving these outcomes;
( 3 ) It must include a strategy for independently validating the performance outcomes achieved under each contract within the strategy prior to payment occurring; and
( 4 ) It must include a description of how the State or local area will reallocate funds to other activities under the contract strategy in the event a service provider does not achieve performance benchmarks under a WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract.
( b ) Prior to the implementation of a WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract strategy, a local area must conduct a feasibility study to determine whether the intervention is suitable for a WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract strategy.
( c ) The WIOA Pay-for-Performance contract strategy must be developed in accordance with guidance issued by the Secretary.