alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Distribution of some shallow-water Foraminifera in the Gulf 
of Mexico

#### Professional Paper 254-F

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 27**                                 (697 
  pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp254F 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:09:55
§ 3152.6 Collection and submission of data. ( a ) The permittee shall submit to the authorized officer all data and information obtained in carrying out the exploration plan.
( b ) All information submitted under this section is subject to part 2 of this title, which sets forth the rules of the Department of the Interior relating to public availability of information contained in Departmental records, as provided at § 3100.4 of this chapter.
[53 FR 17359, May 16, 1988, as amended at 63 FR 52952, Oct. 1, 1998]
§ 22.1 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to establish procedures for the filing and settlement of claims accruing on and after January 18, 1967, under the Federal Tort Claims Act (in part, 28 U.S.C. 2401(b), 2671-2680, as amended by Pub. L. 89-506, 80 Stat. 306).
( b ) [Reserved]
[32 FR 6683, May 2, 1967, as amended at 47 FR 38329, Aug. 31, 1982]
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                            For the month of May 2004

                        Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                          Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456
                       (C1038AAJ) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.


                        Form 20-F X      Form 40-F
                                 ---              ---


Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes         No X
                                ---        ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):  82-
                                    ---------------.
<PAGE>


                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

Month Filed                 Event and Summary                        Exhibit No.

 May 2004      Press release, dated May 6, 2004, announcing              99.1
               the results of Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires
               S.A.'s concurrent bank debt restructuring and
               exchange offer to holders of its 9% Notes due
               2003 and Step Up Floating Rate Notes due 2002.




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                         GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.
                                         (Registrant)



    Date:  May 10, 2004                   By:/s/ Antonio Garces
                                           ------------------------------------
                                            Name:   Antonio Garces
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer
§ 30.123 Will the judge determine matters of status and nationality? ( a ) The judge in a probate proceeding will determine: ( 1 ) If relevant, the status of eligible heirs or devisees as Indians;
( 2 ) If relevant, the nationality or citizenship of eligible heirs or devisees; and
( 3 ) Whether any of the Indian heirs or devisees with U.S. citizenship are individuals for whom the supervision and trusteeship of the United States has been terminated.
( b ) A judge may make determinations under this section in a current probate proceeding or in a completed probate case after a reopening without regard to a time limit.
[73 FR 67289, Nov. 13, 2008, as amended at 86 FR 72084, Dec. 20, 2021]
§ 30.151 May the devisees or eligible heirs in a probate proceeding consolidate their interests? The devisees or eligible heirs may consolidate interests in trust property already owned by the devisees or heirs or in property from the inventory of the decedent's estate, or both. ( a ) A judge may approve a written agreement among devisees or eligible heirs in a probate case to consolidate the interests of a decedent's devisees or eligible heirs. ( 1 ) To accomplish a consolidation, the agreement may include conveyances among decedent's devisees or eligible heirs of: ( i ) Interests in trust or restricted land in the decedent's trust inventory;
( ii ) Interests of the devisees or eligible heirs in trust or restricted land which are not part of the decedent's trust inventory; and
( iii ) Interests of the decedent, the devisees, or eligible heirs in any covered permanent improvements attached to a parcel of trust or restricted land in the decedent's trust inventory.
( 2 ) The parties must offer evidence sufficient to satisfy the judge of the percentage of ownership held and offered by a party.
( 3 ) If the decedent's devisees or eligible heirs enter into an agreement, the parties to the agreement are not required to comply with the Secretary's rules and requirements otherwise applicable to conveyances by deed.
( b ) If the judge approves an agreement, the judge will issue an order distributing the estate in accordance with the agreement.
( c ) In order to approve an agreement, the judge must find that: ( 1 ) The agreement to consolidate is voluntary;
( 2 ) All parties to the agreement know the material facts;
( 3 ) All parties to the agreement understand the effect of the agreement on their rights; and
( 4 ) The agreement accomplishes consolidation.
( d ) An interest included in an approved agreement may not be purchased at probate without consent of the owner of the consolidated interest.
[73 FR 67289, Nov. 13, 2008, as amended at 76 FR 7507, Feb. 10, 2011]
#### § 2568.61 What are the requirements for a personal representative?

The person filing the application must present proof of a current appointment as personal representative of the estate of the deceased veteran by the proper court, or proof that this appointment process has begun.
§ 11.91 How does the authorized official seek recovery of the assessed damages from the potentially responsible party? ( a ) At the conclusion of the assessment, the authorized official must present to the potentially responsible party a demand in writing for the damages determined in accordance with this part and the reasonable cost of the assessment. [See § 11.92(b) to determine how the authorized official must adjust damages if he or she plans to place recovered funds in a non-interest-bearing account.] The authorized official must deliver the demand in a manner that establishes the date of receipt. The demand shall adequately identify the Federal or State agency or Indian tribe asserting the claim, the general location and description of the injured resource, the type of discharge or release determined to have resulted in the injuries, and the damages sought from that party.
( b ) *Report of assessment.* The demand letter shall include the Report of Assessment as an attachment.
( c ) *Rebuttable presumption.* When performed by a Federal or State official in accordance with this part, the natural resource damage assessment and the resulting Damage Determination supported by a complete administrative record of the assessment including the Report of Assessment as described in § 11.90 of this part shall have the force and effect of a rebuttable presumption on behalf of any Federal or State claimant in any judicial or adjudicatory administrative proceeding under CERCLA, or section 311 of the CWA.
( d ) *Potentially responsible party response.* The authorized official should allow at least 60 days from receipt of the demand by the potentially responsible party, with reasonable extensions granted as appropriate, for the potentially responsible party to acknowledge and respond to the demand, prior to filing suit. In cases governed by section 113(g) of CERCLA, the authorized official may include a notice of intent to file suit and must allow at least 60 days from receipt of the demand by the potentially responsible party, with reasonable extensions granted as appropriate, for the potentially responsible party to acknowledge and respond to the demand, prior to filing suit.
[53 FR 5176, Feb. 22, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 14287, Mar. 25, 1994; 61 FR 20612, May 7, 1996; 73 FR 57268, Oct. 2, 2008]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,233.62

 2,233.11

 2,232.55

 2,232.06

 2,231.53

 2,231.06

 2,230.53

 2,229.97

 2,229.41

 2,228.88

 2,228.39

 2,227.88

 2,227.33

 2,226.81

 2,226.28

 2,225.76

 2,224.87

 2,223.94

 2,223.20

 2,222.58

 2,221.84

 2,221.12

 2,220.40

 2,219.66

 2,218.91

 2,218.14

 2,217.38

 2,216.63

 2,215.82

 2,215.03

 2,214.25

 821.2

 817.2

 812.9

 809.1

 805.1

 801.5

 797.4

 793.2

 788.9

 784.9

 781.3

 777.4

 773.3

 769.5

 765.5

 761.7

 755.1

 748.3

 742.9

 738.4

 733.1

 727.9

 722.7

 717.5

 712.1

 706.7

 701.4

 696.2

 690.6

 685.2

 679.9

STORAGE

-3.8

-4.0

-4.3

-3.8

-4.1

-3.6

-4.0

-4.3

-4.2

-4.0

-3.7

-3.8

-4.1

-3.9

-3.9

-3.8

-6.6

-6.8

-5.4

-4.5

-5.4

-5.2

-5.2

-5.3

-5.3

-5.4

-5.3

-5.2

-5.6

-5.4

-5.3

CHANGE

121

146

38

25

44

121

230

31

984

11

143

94

36

95

111

256

229

641

188

224

-67

86

119

90

88

24

34

132

-108

54

136

INFLOW

 1,769

 1,752

 1,693

 1,567

 1,758

 1,588

 1,765

 1,755

 1,766

 1,672

 1,663

 1,671

 1,736

 1,689

 1,756

 1,553

 1,622

 1,527

 1,548

 1,610

 1,673

 1,653

 1,649

 1,692

 1,644

 1,587

 1,554

 1,602

 1,573

 1,610

 1,667

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 203

 305

 486

 293

 280

 301

 447

 375

 1,311

 324

 300

 300

 300

 296

 298

 595

 1,853

 2,498

 1,309

 859

 923

 1,000

 1,000

 998

 1,052

 1,104

 1,103

 1,102

 1,100

 1,099

 1,098

OUTLET

 66

 82

 36

 68

 52

 45

 51

 47

 40

 31

 35

 51

 70

 63

 39

 48

 61

 52

 49

 23

 36

 46

 69

 59

 75

 66

 55

 55

 38

 76

 44

C.F.S.

 .29

 .36

 .16

 .30

 .23

 .20

 .23

 .21

 .18

 .14

 .16

 .23

 .32

 .29

 .18

 .22

 .28

 .24

 .23

 .11

 .17

 .22

 .33

 .28

 .36

 .32

 .27

 .27

 .19

 .38

 .22

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 18, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -145.2 4,356 51,364 0 24,512 1,628 7.57 .07

ACRE-FEET -145,200 8,640 101,880 0 48,620 3,229

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 101,880

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 48,620

 150,500

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .07

JULY 1, 2015 2.10

 825.0

Table 4

(1) (1)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

GARY MEHARG, a South Carolina

Individual; PAMELA MEHARG, a

South Carolina Individual,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. No. 96-1074

FREDDY POZNICK, a South Carolina

Individual; SUSAN POZNICK, a South

Carolina Individual,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Greenwood.

G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge.

(CA-95-1387-8-3)

Submitted: March 31, 1997

Decided: April 11, 1997

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Symmes Watkins Culbertson, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellants. J. Stephen Welch, WELCH & CRAIN, L.L.C., Greenwood,

South Carolina, for Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, Susan and Freddy Poznick, appeal the jury's verdicts

finding them liable for violating the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511(1)(c) (1994), and the trial court's order

denying their FED. R. CIV. P. 59 motion and granting the Appellees'

motion for attorney's fees. After the jury was dismissed, the Poznicks

moved for a new trial asserting that the jury's verdicts were fatally

inconsistent, and that the trial court had erroneously instructed the

jury concerning damages. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

The Poznicks failed to raise the issue of consistent verdicts before

the jury was discharged; thus, they waived their right to raise this

issue on appeal. See White v. Celotex Corp., 878 F.2d 144, 146 (4th

Cir. 1989). Moveover, the Poznicks waived their right to challenge

the trial court's supplemental instruction in response to the jury's

question, "[d]o we have to award ten thousand dollars?" When asked

by the court whether they had any objections to the court's answer,

"[y]ou may award zero damages or you may award ten thousand dollars damages," counsel replied, "[n]one from the defense, your

honor." Additionally, our review of the instructions given by the court

reveals that they, "construed as a whole, and in light of the whole

record, adequately informed the jury of the controlling legal principles without misleading or confusing the jury." Spell v. McDaniel,

824 F.2d 1380, 1395 (4th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, the jury's verdicts and the district court's order denying the Poznicks' Rule 59 motion for a new trial and granting the

Mehargs' motion for attorney's fees are affirmed. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
§ 2932.31 How does BLM establish fees for Special Recreation Permits? ( a ) The BLM Director establishes fees, including minimum annual fees, for Special Recreation Permits for commercial activities, organized group activities or events, and competitive events.
( b ) The BLM Director may adjust the fees as necessary to reflect changes in costs and the market, using the following types of data: ( 1 ) The direct and indirect cost to the government;
( 2 ) The types of services or facilities provided; and
( 3 ) The comparable recreation fees charged by other Federal agencies, non-Federal public agencies, and the private sector located within the service area.
( c ) The BLM Director will publish fees and adjusted fees in the Federal Register.
( d ) The State Director with jurisdiction— ( 1 ) Will set fees for other Special Recreation Permits (including any use of Special Areas, such as per capita special area fees applicable to all users, including private noncommercial visitors, commercial clients, and spectators),
( 2 ) May adjust the fees when he or she finds it necessary,
( 3 ) Will provide fee information in field offices, and
( 4 ) Will provide newspaper or other appropriate public notice.
( e ) ( 1 ) *Commercial use.* In addition to the fees set by the Director, BLM, if BLM needs more than 50 hours of staff time to process a Special Recreation Permit for commercial use in any one year, we may charge a fee for recovery of the processing costs.
( 2 ) *Competitive or organized group/event use.* BLM may charge a fee for recovery of costs to the agency of analyses and permit processing instead of the Special Recreation Permit fee, if— ( i ) BLM needs more than 50 hours of staff time to process a Special Recreation Permit for competitive or organized group/event use in any one year, and
( ii ) We anticipate that permit fees on the fee schedule for that year will be less than the costs of processing the permit.
( 3 ) *Limitations on cost recovery.* Cost recovery charges will be limited to BLM's costs of issuing the permit, including necessary environmental documentation, on-site monitoring, and permit enforcement. Programmatic or general land use plan NEPA documentation are not subject to cost recovery charges, except if the documentation work done was done for or provides special benefits or services to an identifiable individual applicant.
( f ) We will notify you in writing if you need to pay actual costs before processing your application.
§ 1823.12 When and how may I obtain a refund? ( a ) In making a payment to BLM, if the funds or fees you submitted to BLM exceed the amount required or if the regulations provide that fees submitted to BLM must be returned in certain situations, you may be entitled to a full or partial refund.
( b ) If you believe you are due a refund, you may request it from the BLM office where you previously submitted your payment. You should state the reasons you believe you are entitled to a refund and include a copy of the appropriate receipt, canceled check, or other relevant documents.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Lake Clark National Park**
 
Map | Text
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.6:L 14 C/2006
Item Number:0651 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001032332
 
August 26, 2019
Exhibit 10.29


 


 


 


MAD7 Research and Development License


Effective January 1, 2019


	TERMS
	License Type	Non-exclusive, non-transferable license in the Licensed Fields of Use from Inscripta, Inc. for research and development using 1) the MAD7 nuclease (as defined by SEQ ID NO:7 in U.S.  Pat.  No. 9,982,279); or 2) native and codon optimized nucleic acids encoding a MAD7 nuclease. 1) and 2) collectively are referred to as “MAD7”.  This license in the Licensed Fields of Use is irrevocable, subject to licensee not using MAD7 in the Excluded Fields of Use below without reaching further agreement with Inscripta.
	Inscripta, Inc. Contact	General Counsel, Inscripta, Inc. (dianna.devore@inscripta.com)
	Licensed Patent(s)	U.S.  Patent No. 9,982,279, U.S.  Patent No. 10,337,028, and applications claiming priority therefrom, including continuations, continuations-in part, divisionals, and foreign counterparts.
	Licensed Fields of Use	1) Use of MAD7 to perform research and development in both academic and commercial settings with no restrictions on plant or animal species and varieties; 2) use of MAD7 to perform commercial services, subject to the Excluded Fields of Use.
	Excluded Fields of use	1) Sale or re-sale of MAD7, including as part of a therapeutic product; or 2) continued use of MAD7 in a commercial manufacturing process; and 3) use of MAD7 in the editing of human embryos.  For clarity, the use of MAD7 to create a commercial product that does not physically contain MAD7 at the time of sale and does not require continued use of MAD7 for manufacture is not considered an Excluded Field of Use.
	Licensed Territory	Worldwide
	Duration	The duration of the last valid claim of the Licensed Patent(s)
	ROYALTIES & PAYMENTS	 
	Initial License Fee	None
	Earned Royalties	None
	CHOICE OF LAW	
    This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
    Delaware, without reference to conflict of laws principles

	SUBLICENSING	 
	Sublicensing	Not permitted; collaborators and/or distribution partners can acquire an individual license on the same terms as provided herein.


 


	INSCRIPTA, INC.	 	CENTURY THERAPEUTICS, INC.
	 
	By:	  /s/ Dianne L. DeVore	 	By:	  /s/ Janelle Anderson
	Printed Name:  Dianne L.
    DeVore	 	Printed Name:  Janelle Anderson
	Title:  General Counsel	 	Title:  Chief Strategy Officer
	Date:  January 1, 2019	 	Date 1 Jan 2019





 


	5500 Central Avenue	*	Suite 220	*	Boulder, CO 80301