alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,  Peter  Sotola,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of  Pacific  Spirit,  Inc.,  for the  fiscal  year  ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all  material  respects  the
financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Spirit, Inc.

Date:  March 27, 2006


                                           /s/ Peter Sotola
                                           --------------------------------
                                            Peter Sotola
                                            President, C.E.O. and Director
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 681.620 How are summer employment opportunities administered?

Summer employment opportunities are a component of the work experience program element. If youth service providers administer the work experience program element, they must be selected by the Local WDB according to the requirements of WIOA sec. 123 and § 681.400, based on criteria contained in the State Plan. However, the summer employment administrator does not need to select the employers who are providing the employment opportunities through a competitive process.
##### 



Exhibit 12 Statement Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(amounts in thousands, except ratios) Year Ended December 31,2003
    
    2002
    
    2001
    
    2000
    
    1999Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
    
    $
    51,926
    
    
    $
    39,166
    
    
    $
    45,205
    
    
    $
    63,526
    
    
    $
    86,793Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    6,289
    
    
    $
    1,885
    
    
    $
    4,968
    
    
    $
    1,140
    
    
    $
    Amortized premiums
    
    
    91
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    30Interest
component of rental expense(1)
    
    
    554
    
    
    
    479
    
    
    
    692
    
    
    
    648
    
    
    
    572Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    6,934
    
    
    $
    2,425
    
    
    $
    5,721
    
    
    $
    1,849
    
    
    $
    602Pre-tax income from continuing
operations plus fixed charges
    
    $
    58,860
    
    
    $
    41,591
    
    
    $
    50,926
    
    
    $
    65,375
    
    
    $
    87,395Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    8.5
    x
    
    
    17.2
    x
    
    
    8.9
    x
    
    
    35.4
    x
    
    
    145.3x
 Quarter EndedApril 3,2004Income before income taxes
    
    $
    13,910Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    2,420Amortized premiums
    
    
    Interest
component of rental expense(1)
    
    
    129Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    2,549Income before income taxes plus fixed charges
    
    $
    16,459Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    6.5
    x
    (1) Represents appropriate portion (1/3) of rental expense.
### §286e–1. Increase in quota of United States and in capital stock of Bank; subscription to additional shares

(a) The United States Governor of the Fund is authorized to request and consent to an increase of $1,375,000,000 in the quota of the United States under article III, section 2, of the articles of agreement of the Fund, as proposed in the resolution of the Board of Governors of the Fund dated February 2, 1959.

(b) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized (1) to vote for increases in the capital stock of the Bank under article II, section 2, of the articles of agreement of the Bank, as recommended in the resolution of the Board of Governors of the Bank dated February 2, 1959, and (2) if such increases become effective, to subscribe on behalf of the United States to thirty-one thousand seven hundred and fifty additional shares of stock under article II, section 3, of the articles of agreement of the Bank.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §16, as added Pub. L. 86–48, §1, June 17, 1959, 73 Stat. 80.)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4510 

To insure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts Ditch headgate 

and ditch segment within the Holy Cross Wilderness in Eagle County, 

Colorado, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2016 

Mr. POLIS (for himself, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. TIPTON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To insure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts 

Ditch headgate and ditch segment within the Holy Cross 

Wilderness in Eagle County, Colorado, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bolts Ditch Access 

5 and Use Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds as follows: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4510 IH

1 (1) Since about 1882, the existing Bolts Ditch 

2 headgate and ditch have been used to fill Bolts Lake 

3 near Minturn, Colorado, by gravitational means, 

4 without the need for pumping and the attendant 

5 cost and energy use of pumping. 

6 (2) When the Holy Cross Wilderness was des7 ignated by Congress in 1980, the Bolts Ditch 

8 headgate, and an approximate 450-foot segment of 

9 the Bolts Ditch, were inadvertently included inside 

10 the Wilderness boundary. 

11 (3) The town of Minturn seeks to use its mu12 nicipal water rights to store water in Bolts Lake. 

13 (4) Questions have arisen with respect to con14 tinued use, maintenance, and repair of the headgate 

15 and ditch segment within the Wilderness. 

16 (5) Legislation is warranted to correct this situ17 ation and authorize the continued use, access to, and 

18 maintenance and repair of the Bolts Ditch headgate 

19 and small portion of the Bolts Ditch that lie within 

20 the Wilderness boundary. 

21 SEC. 3. BOLTS DITCH ACCESS. 

22 (a) ACCESS GRANTED.—The Secretary of Agriculture 

23 shall permit by special use authorization nonmotorized ac24 cess and use, in accordance with section 293.6 of title 36, 

25 Code of Federal Regulations, of the Bolts Ditch headgate 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4510 IH

1 and the Bolts Ditch within the Holy Cross Wilderness, 

2 Colorado, as designated by Public Law 96–560, for the 

3 purposes of the diversion of water and use, maintenance, 

4 and repair of such ditch and headgate by the Town of 

5 Minturn, Colorado, a Colorado Home Rule Municipality. 

6 (b) LOCATION OF FACILITIES.—The Bolts Ditch 

7 headgate and ditch segment referenced in subsection (a) 

8 are as generally depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Bolts Ditch 

9 headgate and Ditch Segment’’, dated November 2015. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
National UAS Solutions, LLC.

104 Raphael Drive

Lafayette, LA 70508

September 2, 2015

Exemption Number 11570

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0347

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request to amend Exemption No. 11570 to allow National UAS Solutions, LLC to add the 

SenseFly eXom, the SenseFly eBee, the SenseFly swinglet CAM, the PrecisionHawk Lancaster, 

and the Roboflight RF70 sUAS platforms under the same directions and limitations as provided 

within Exemption No. 11570, docket Number FAA-2015-0347, approved on May 13. 2015.

Dear Sir or Madam,

National UAS Solutions, LLC was issued an exemption under Section 333 of the “FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012” numbered 11570 for the purpose of gathering aerial data using small Unmanned Aerial 

Systems. Since the exemption was granted, National UAS Solutions, LLC has determined the need to add the 

SenseFly eXom, the SenseFly eBee, the SenseFly swinglet CAM, the PrecisionHawk Lancaster and the 

Roboflight RF70 sUAS’s to our exemption to meet our expanding customer base needs to remain competitive 

and enhance services afforded our customers.

All of these small UAS’s have been approved in other exemptions, all weigh under 55 pounds and all have 

forward speeds of 50 knots or less. They will all operate with an altitude restriction of 400 feet or less. Further, 

the sUAS’s will be operated in accordance with the limitations and restrictions enumerated in Exemption No. 

11570 already granted National UAS Solutions, LLC.

Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any novel issue, and because 

the addition of these sUAS platforms to our fleet will not materially affect our already granted petition No. 

11570 in any way, and because National UAS Solutions, LLC seeks to begin operations immediately, National 

UAS Solutions, LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense with 
publication of the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested ammendment 

expeditiously by summary means.

Thank you for your kind consideration in the granting of this amendment.

Best regards,

Charles R. O’Neal, Jr.

President/CEO

National UAS Solutions, LLC

Lafayette, LA 70508

(337) 288-1793

coneal@nationaluassolutions.com
#### § 2932.13 How will I know if individual use of a special area requires a Special Recreation Permit?

BLM will publish notification of the requirement to obtain a Special Recreation Permit to enter a special area in the Federal Register and local and regional news media. We will post permit requirements at major access points for the special area and provide information at the local BLM office.
May 10,2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Reference; DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, 2000-7856 

Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals, AL EAS 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Sleep Outfitters of Alabama dba Mattress King in Florence Alabama wishes to lend its support to the 

proposal of Silver Airways to provide essential air service at Muscle Shoals as replacement for current 

Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air 

transportation system is critical to the economic well being of Florence, AL and to Mattress King in 

Florence, AL. 1/we Mattress King rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. 

The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is 

not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination 

from the entire 'Shoals area in its own right. 

We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service 

long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced or eliminated. 

1/we urge the Department of Transportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide the 

Shoals Area essential air service. 

;p;s, tJWtJA?(_ 

StacyO'Ha/ 

Store Manager 

Mattress King of Florence Alabama
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     Guidance for the Tribal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Program. *OMB No.:*
                     0970-0157. *Description:*42 U.S.C. 612 (Section 412 of the Social Security Act) requires each Indian tribe that elects to administer and operate a TANF program to submit a TANF Tribal Plan. The TANF Tribal Plan is a mandatory statement submitted to the Secretary by the Indian tribe, which consists of an outline of how the Indian tribe's TANF program will be administered and operated. It is used by the Secretary to determine whether the plan is approvable and to determine that the Indian tribe is eligible to receive a TANF assistance grant. It is also made available to the public. *Respondents:*
                     Indian Tribes applying to operate a TANF program. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of 
                             respondents
Number of 
                             responses per respondent
Average burden hours per response
Total burden hoursRequest for State Data Needed to Determine the Amount of a Tribal Family Assistance Grant
20
1
60
1200
 *Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*
                     1200 *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *grjohnson@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF, E-mail address: 
                    *Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.* Dated: September 22, 2004. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 04-21788  Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Charles Ray Miller, Appellant

No. 06-14-00124-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1423721). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Charles Ray Miller, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 12, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


           Consent of Registered Independent Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors
Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc.


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm dated October 22, 2004 on the consolidated
balance sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss, shareholders' equity
(deficiency), and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2003 included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously
filed Registration Statement (File No. 333-101447).


/s/ STONEFIELD JOSEPHSON , INC.

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Irvine, California
October 22, 2004
### §500c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Sept. 1, 1937, ch. 897, §4, 50 Stat. 900, which authorized Secretary to accept gifts for purposes of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 30.401 Who may purchase at probate? An eligible purchaser at probate is any of the following: ( a ) Any devisee or eligible heir who is receiving an interest in the same parcel of land by devise or descent in the probate proceeding;
( b ) Any co-owner;
( c ) The Indian Tribe with jurisdiction over the parcel containing the interest; or
( d ) The Secretary on behalf of the Tribe.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4517 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4517

To expand the eligible uses of firefighter assistance grant funds, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2022

Mr. Ossoff (for himself and Mr. Hawley) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand the eligible uses of firefighter assistance grant funds, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fire Station Improvement Act of 
2022''.

SEC. 2. USE OF FIREFIGHTER ASSISTANCE GRANT FUNDS.

    Section 33(c)(3)(J) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act 
of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229(c)(3)(J)) is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(J) To repair, modify, or improve fire stations, 
                fire training facilities, and other similar 
                facilities--
                            ``(i) to improve the functionality of those 
                        facilities; or
                            ``(ii) to protect the health and safety of 
                        firefighting personnel.''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2885.19 What is the rent for a linear right-of-way grant? ( a ) The BLM will use the Per Acre Rent Schedule (see paragraph (b) of this section) to calculate the rent. Counties (or other geographical areas) are assigned to a County Zone Number and Per Acre Zone Value based upon 80 percent of their average per acre land and building value published in the NASS Census. The initial assignment of counties to the zones in the Per Acre Rent Schedule for the 5-year period from 2006 to 2010 is based upon data contained in the most recent NASS Census (2002). Subsequent assignments of counties will occur every 5 years following the publication of the NASS Census. The Per Acre Rent Schedule is also adjusted periodically as follows: ( 1 ) Each calendar year the BLM will adjust the per acre rent values in §§ 2806.20 and 2885.19(b) for all types of linear right-of-way facilities in each zone based on the average annual change in the IPD-GDP for the 10-year period immediately preceding the year that the NASS Census data becomes available. For example, the average annual change in the IPD-GDP from 1994 to 2003 (the 10-year period immediately preceding the year (2004) that the 2002 NASS Census data became available) is 1.9 percent. This annual adjustment factor is applied to years 2006 through 2015 of the Per Acre Rent Schedule. Likewise, the average annual change in the IPD-GDP from 2004 to 2013 (the 10-year period immediately preceding the year (2014) when the 2012 NASS Census data will become available) will be applied to years 2016 through 2025 of the Per Acre Rent Schedule.
( 2 ) The BLM will review the NASS Census data from the 2012 NASS Census, and each subsequent 10-year period, and as appropriate, revise the number of county zones and the per acre zone values. Any revision must include 100 percent of the number of counties and listed geographical areas for all states and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and must reasonably reflect the increases or decreases in the average per acre land and building values contained in the NASS Census.
( b ) You may obtain a copy of the current Per Acre Rent Schedule at *https://www.blm.gov ,* by contacting your local BLM state, district, or field office, or by writing: Attention to the Division of Lands, Realty and Cadastral Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C Street NW, Mail Stop 2134LM, Washington, DC 20240.
[73 FR 65073, Oct. 31, 2008, as amended at 81 FR 92228, Dec. 19, 2016; 89 FR 25975, Apr. 12, 2024]
#### § 1824.15 What does it mean to post a notice?

Posting a notice is similar to publishing a notice except that the notice is displayed at the appropriate BLM office, local courthouse or similar prominent local government building or on a prominent fixture such as a building, tree or post located on the particular public lands involved.
§ 30.125 May a judge order that a property interest be partitioned as a result of a devise? ( a ) A judge may order a property interest to be partitioned if: ( 1 ) A will attempts to divide an allotment into two or more distinct portions and devises at least one of those portions;
( 2 ) The decedent was the sole owner of the allotment;
( 3 ) The allotment is held entirely in trust or restricted status; and
( 4 ) The devise describes the portions of the allotment in a manner that allows the judge to readily ascertain which portion of the allotment descends to each intended devisee.
( b ) If the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section are not met, the judge may find that a devise of a portion of an undivided allotment fails.
[86 FR 72084, Dec. 20, 2021]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Stanford W. Jones, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58032;

First District (1st Division) —

July 23, 1973.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (H. A. Cowen, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (James Veldman, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

BURKE, J., took no part.