See the response to comment CO36-1 reg

interest.

COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONSCO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities

Companies and Or

CO65-1

S-873
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-874
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-875
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-876
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-877
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-878
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-879
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-880
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-881
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-882
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-883
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-884
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-885
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-886
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-887
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-888
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-889
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-890
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-891
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-892
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-893
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-894
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-895
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-896
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-897
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-898
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-899
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-900
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-901
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-902
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-903
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-904
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-905
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-906
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-907
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-908
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-909
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-910
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-911
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-912
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-913
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-914
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-915
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-916
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-917
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-918
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-919
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-920
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-921
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-922
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-923
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-924
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-925
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-926
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-927
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-928
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-929
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-930
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-931
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-932
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-933
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-934
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-935
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-936
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-937
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-938
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-939
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO65 – Center for Sustainable Rural Communities (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-940
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO66 – Binghamton-Oneonta Building and Construction Trades Council

Companies and Or

The commentor’s statements in support oare noted.

CO66-1

S-941
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO66 – Binghamton-Oneonta Building and Construction Trades Council (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-942
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO67 – NYS Economic Development Council

Companies and Or

The commentor’s statements in support oare noted.

CO67-1

S-943
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO68 – Delaware-Otsego Audubon Society

Companies and Or

The commentor’s reference to their previ(CO13 and CO41) and the comment that Migratory Bird and Upland Forest Plan is the response to comment FA4-29.

CO68-1

We recognize that many bird species, incbirds of conservation concern or those thaforest habitats, may be impacted by the prThe intent of the Preliminary Migratory BPlan is to define impact avoidance and mand to propose mitigation to account for uThese mitigation measures would also mithat are not listed as birds of conservation interior forest habitats. See also the respo2 and section 4.6.1 of the EIS. 

CO68-2

S-944
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO68 – Delaware-Otsego Audubon Society (cont’d)

Companies and Or

Loss of habitat and potential increases in parasitism are discussed in section 4 of thBird and Upland Forest Plan and in sectioalso the response to comment CO26-14. that “Based on these studies, Constitution minimum interior forest block size of 35 adequately support interior forest species based on 350-acre minimum forest block)forest block would encompass at least 350 at least 35 acres would be comprised of inaccurate to say that the Plan arbitrarily deacre forested parcel” as being adequate to species; rather, the forested block would bsize. The agency coordination regarding blocks to be considered is ongoing, and fomodified in the final version of the Plan. Plan is provided in sections 4.5 and 4.6.1 

CO68-3

Minimum habitat block sizes for forest inspecies based on literature are discussed iPreliminary Migratory Bird and Upland Fresponse to comment CO68-3. 

CO68-4

S-945
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO68 – Delaware-Otsego Audubon Society (cont’d)

Companies and Or

Reforestation of the temporary right-of-whowever, the permanent right-of-way (50 maintained in a grassy or shrubby conditiproject. Disturbed areas outside the permwould be allowed to revert to forested covprocess would take decades to re-grow to construction right-of-way typically would feet wide in upland forested areas, so abothe disturbed area (plus extra workspacesre-grow with tree cover. Constitution proposed to deposit funds to conservation of migratory bird habitat incas acquisition or long-term conservation omigratory bird conservation, implementatmeasures on such lands or on federal / staterm management of such lands, public oresearch grants for species of concern. Thto be deposited is yet to be determined anvalue of the habitats lost, the requirementconservation actions, and other factors. Tdetermined through Constitution’s coordithe PGC, the PADCNR, and the NYSDEdisbursed by a selected, third-party, non-porganization. Our assessment of the Plan 4.5 and 4.6.1 of the final EIS. See the responses to comments SA4-1 analternative M.

CO68-5

S-946
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO68 – Delaware-Otsego Audubon Society (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-947
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice

Companies and Or

The commentor’s opposition to the Prelimand Upland Forest Plan is noted. The plaforests and migratory birds as recommendhowever, Constitution did acknowledge in mitigation funds could be used to support species, such as the northern long-eared ballow companies to fund research as a forimpacts on listed species. The northern loproposed for listing by the FWS. See the CO41-53 through CO41-80 (Heatley Rep

CO69-1

The commentor’s reference to their previo(CO11 and CO41) is noted. See the resporegarding the public ability to review and See the response to comment CO68-3 regWe have evaluated reduced right-of-way of trees in areas outside the permanent rigsection 4.5.3 of the EIS. We have also upthe EIS in regard to migratory birds, incluConstitution’s proposal to clear trees outsrecommended tree clearing window and Cto not perform nesting surveys or to implecommentor’s opposition to the Plan is not

CO69-2

S-948
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

Our assessment of the Plan is provided in of the final EIS. See the response to comthe public’s ability to review and commenmaterials filed after the end of the comme

CO69-3

S-949
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

The commentor’s statement regarding theforward for environmental review is notedcomment FA1-1 regarding adequacy of thEIS has been updated with new informatioappropriate and in response to comments 

CO69-4

S-950
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

The commentor’s opposition to the Prelimand Upland Forest Plan is noted. 

CO69-5

See the response to comment CO69-2 regwidth.

CO69-6

Based on our experience with restoration, replanting of trees in formerly disturbed asignificantly enhance or expedite the returTypically, in areas with adequate rainfall would occur with establishment of herbacrestoration), tree saplings readily colonize 2 or 3 growing seasons. Constitution wouand local conservation agencies to finalize mixes to be used to revegetate the right-ofwould be required to monitor the right-of-growing seasons following construction to revegetation and we recommended in sectmonitor for at least 3 years following succdetermined by the FERC) for invasive spe

CO69-7

See the response to comment CO68-3 regblock sizes. 

CO69-8

S-951
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

Constitution provided the following citatienvironmental information request. HarrFragmented Forest – Island Biogeography Preservation of Biotic Diversity. Univers230p.

CO69-9

The comment regarding remaining blocks project region is noted. Based on our revphotography for the project vicinity and rmultiple, well-distributed blocks of forestforest, would remain in the area if the Cocertificated and built. 

CO69-10CO69-11 See the response to comment CO69-2.

Constitution’s proposed habitat quality clquantitative assessment are being developthe FWS, the PGC, the PADCNR, and thUltimately, these parameters will be assigand input. It is reasonable to assume that would have relatively greater habitat valucharacteristics, such as designation as an value of interior forest relative to edge fodisturbance resulting in the total area of rbeing reduced to below a threshold quantcurrent version of the Plan addresses indiinterior (300-foot-wide buffer zone on bocorridors within forest interior) only for dhabitats. The agency coordination regardand mitigation for forest interiors is ongomodified in future versions of the Plan. OPlan is provided in sections 4.5 and 4.6.1 

CO69-12

The agency coordination regarding tempoimpacts on and mitigation for forest interi(including permanent) access roads is ongmodified in future versions of the Plan. OPlan is provided in sections 4.5 and 4.6.1 

CO69-13

S-952
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

See the response to comments CO69-7 (vand FA6-10 (invasive species monitoring)

CO69-14

See the response to comment CO69-7 regrestoration. We recognize that existing laspecies could be replaced by early-succesoutside of the maintained permanent rightconstruction. We also recognize that earlymay be best adapted to colonize and stabiconditions. 

CO69-15

Section 5 of the preliminary Plan includes proposed impact avoidance and minimizatcompensatory mitigation for unavoidable established process for impacts on federalfor example such as for impacts on waterbunder Section 404 of the Clean Water Actpreliminary Plan is following a similar mialthough impacts on upland forests are noSee the response to comments CO1-4 (runCO41-54 (stream chemistry), and CO41-5soil moisture) regarding forest cutting and Compensation for landowners that would project is discussed in section 4.8.2 of the to comment FA6-10 regarding invasive spproposed level of funding for conservation determined in coordination with the particthe response to comment CO69-12 regardof the clearing of forest interiors.

CO69-16

S-953
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

See the responses to comments CO69-2 (CO69-7 (re-planting of trees), and FA6-1Constitution is currently proposing to mit1,549 acres of upland forest habitat distribcategories (high and moderate value, plus high value habitat). The proposed mitigafor actual, total direct project impact of apacres during construction and approximatoperation. These overall forest impacts wapproximately 440 acres of interior forest and 218 acres of interior forest permanenoperations. Our assessment of the Plan is 4.5 and 4.6.1 of the final EIS. See also thCO13-1.

CO69-17

The commentor’s opposition to the Prelimand Upland Forest Plan is noted. The finahabitat categories, and compensation procin coordination with the FWS, the PGC, thNYSDEC and will be reviewed and assesthe responses to comments CO69-13 (acc(invasive species), CO69-7 (re-planting of (right-of-way width), The process for more-vegetation is prescribed in section V.D Upland Erosion Control, Re-vegetation, awhich is based on the FERC’s standard.

CO69-18

S-954
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO69 – Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-955
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO70 –Hudson Highlands Environmental

Companies and Or

The comment regarding Constitution’s anvariations, initially including some that wrequested by the FERC, is noted.

CO70-1

S-956
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO70 –Hudson Highlands Environmental (cont’d)

Companies and Or

We concur that there are some differencedepicted by the Kernan Land Trust and itdepicted by the FERC in its May 29, 201and the routes depicted by Constitution in June 3 and June 19, 2014. However, thesrelatively minor, there is no evidence that adjusted by Constitution to affect the outcand we recognize that it is very likely thavariations would have to be adjusted and specific resources if they were selected foor for adoption. 

CO70-2

The comment about Constitution’s analysdata in the tables, as well as the maps depiphotography and topography, the FERC stanalyses. The mapping provided allows idfeatures along the routes, which can be sumapping tools. The relative quality of habmay be previously disturbed due to an adjeasement, can also be assessed using the d

CO70-3

S-957
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO70 –Hudson Highlands Environmental (cont’d)

Companies and Or

Typically, the FERC does not require field evaluations of alternatives. Additionally, compare equivalent source types of data in analysis, such as all desktop data, as oppotypes. The use of two different data sourcinaccurate, inappropriate, or unfair comparoutes or scenarios. As of the date of Conthey did not have access to the property foowner provided data from a field wetland response to comment CO5-6.

CO70-4

The commentor’s statement regarding a rdelineation, the claim regarding wetlands and a future submittal to the FERC regardnoted.

CO70-5

S-958
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO70 –Hudson Highlands Environmental (cont’d)

Companies and Or

See the responses to comments FA6-10 a3.4.3 of the EIS has been revised with new the Kernan Land Trust property and our aimpact avoidance, minimization, and miti

CO70-6

S-959
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO70 –Hudson Highlands Environmental (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-960
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO71 –Earthjustice

Companies and Or

See the response to comment CO26-18 reNortheast Energy Direct project. We havthe EIS to address the possibility of collocand Northeast Energy Direct and also of a projects. See the response to comment LAneed. As stated in section 3.2.2 of the EIScapacity on existing pipeline systems in thprojects’ need. 

CO71-1

S-961
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO71 –Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-962
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO71 –Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-963
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO71 –Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-964
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO72 –Pace Environmental

Companies and Or

CO72-1 See the response to comment CO71-1.

S-965
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO72 –Pace Environmental (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-966
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO73 –Earthjustice

Companies and Or

CO73-1 The mailing list has been updated accordi

S-967
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO73 –Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-968
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO73 –Earthjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-969
The information regarding the recent deci

Court for the District of Colorado in High Advocates, et al. v. United States Forest Scv-01723-RBJ, 2014 WL 2922751 (D. Cothe social cost of carbon protocol is notedthe EIS for a discussion of the social cost 

COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONSCO74 – Eathjustice

Companies and Or

CO74-1

S-970
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-971
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-972
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-973
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-974
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-975
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-976
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-977
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-978
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-979
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-980
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-981
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-982
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-983
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-984
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-985
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-986
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-987
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-988
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-989
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-990
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-991
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-992
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-993
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-994
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-995
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-996
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-997
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-998
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-999
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1000
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1001
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1002
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1003
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1004
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1005
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1006
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1007
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO74 – Eathjustice (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1008
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO75 – HydroQuest

Companies and Or

See the response to comment FA8-3 regaSee the response to comment LA7-5 regacomment CO50-55 regarding benefit. Secomment LA4-2 regarding water well testo comment IND285-2 regarding chemicacomment CO45-1 regarding compensatio

CO75-1

S-1009
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO75 – HydroQuest (cont’d)

Companies and Or

The commentor’ statements regarding cothe response to comment CO43-8 regardi

CO75-2

S-1010
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO75 – HydroQuest (cont’d)

Companies and Or

CO75-3 See the response to comment FA4-54 reg

S-1011
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO75 – HydroQuest (cont’d)

Companies and Or

The commentor’s figures were not locatefiled on e-Library.

CO75-4

S-1012
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO75 – HydroQuest (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1013
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP

Companies and Or

The commentor’s request for intervention assessment of a reroute designed to avoid contained within section 3.4.3 of the EIS.

CO76-1

S-1014
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1015
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1016
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1017
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1018
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1019
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1020
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1021
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1022
COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS

CO76 – Nolan and Heller, LLP (cont’d)

Companies and Or

S-1023