alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen J. Bacica, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ STEPHEN J. BACICAName:
Stephen J. BacicaTitle:
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
March 4, 2010
Editorial Note on Part 1600
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-12, the Bureau of Land Management removed all amendments to part 1600 made effective on Jan. 11, 2017, at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016.

§ 1610.7-1 Designation of areas unsuitable for surface mining. ( a ) ( 1 ) The planning process is the chief process by which public land is reviewed to assess whether there are areas unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations under section 522(b) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. The unsuitability criteria to be applied during the planning process are found in § 3461.1 of this title.
( 2 ) When petitions to designate land unsuitable under section 522(c) of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act are referred to the Bureau of Land Management for comment, the resource management plan, or plan amendment if available, shall be the basis for review.
( 3 ) After a resource management plan or plan amendment is approved in which lands are assessed as unsuitable, the Field Manager shall take all necessary steps to implement the results of the unsuitability review as it applies to all or certain types of coal mining.
( b ) ( 1 ) The resource management planning process is the chief process by which public lands are reviewed for designation as unsuitable for entry or leasing for mining operations for minerals and materials other than coal under section 601 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act.
( 2 ) When petitions to designate lands unsuitable under section 601 of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act are received by the Bureau of Land Management, the resource management plan, if available, shall be the basis for determinations for designation.
( 3 ) After a resource management plan or plan amendment in which lands are designated unsuitable is approved, the Field Manager shall take all necessary steps to implement the results of the unsuitability review as it applies to minerals or materials other than coal.
[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 70 FR 14567, Mar. 23, 2005; 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
§ 3140.42 Issuance of the combined hydrocarbon lease. ( a ) After a plan of operations is found acceptable, and is approved, the authorized officer will prepare and submit to the owner, for execution, a combined hydrocarbon lease containing all appropriate terms and conditions, including any necessary stipulations that were part of the oil and gas lease being converted, as well as any additional stipulations, such as those required to ensure compliance with the plan of operations.
( b ) The authorized officer will not sign the combined hydrocarbon lease until it has been executed by the conversion applicant and the lease or claim to be converted has been formally relinquished to the United States.
( c ) The effective date of the combined hydrocarbon lease will be the first day of the month following the date that the authorized officer signs the lease.
( d ) The authorized officer will issue one combined hydrocarbon lease to cover the existing contiguous oil and gas leases or valid claims based on mineral locations which have been approved for conversion within the special tar sand area.
§ 683.630 What additional appeal processes or systems must a State have for the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act program? ( a ) Non-designation of local areas: ( 1 ) The State must establish, and include in its State Plan, due process procedures which provide expeditious appeal to the State WDB for a unit of general local government (including a combination of such units) or grant recipient that requests, but is not granted, initial or subsequent designation of an area as a local area under WIOA sec. 106(b)(2) or 106(b)(3) and § 679.250 of this chapter.
( 2 ) These procedures must provide an opportunity for a hearing and prescribe appropriate time limits to ensure prompt resolution of the appeal.
( 3 ) If the appeal to the State WDB does not result in designation, the appellant may request review by the Secretary under § 683.640.
( b ) Denial or termination of eligibility as a training provider: ( 1 ) A State must establish procedures which allow providers of training services the opportunity to appeal: ( i ) Denial of eligibility by a Local WDB or the designated State agency under WIOA sec. 122(b), 122(c), or 122(d).
( ii ) Termination of eligibility or other action by a Local WDB or State agency under WIOA sec. 122(f); or
( iii ) Denial of eligibility as a provider of on-the-job training (OJT) or customized training by a one-stop operator under WIOA sec. 122(h).
( 2 ) Such procedures must provide an opportunity for a hearing and prescribe appropriate time limits to ensure prompt resolution of the appeal.
( 3 ) A decision under this State appeal process may not be appealed to the Secretary.
( c ) Testing and sanctioning for use of controlled substances. ( 1 ) A State must establish due process procedures, in accordance with WIOA sec. 181(f), which provide expeditious appeal for: ( i ) Participants in programs under title I, subtitle B of WIOA subject to testing for use of controlled substances, imposed under a State policy established under WIOA sec. 181(f)(1); and
( ii ) Participants in programs under title I, subtitle B of WIOA who are sanctioned, in accordance with WIOA sec. 181(f)(2), after testing positive for the use of controlled substances, under the policy described in paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) A decision under this State appeal process may not be appealed to the Secretary.
#### § 3162.2 Drilling, producing, and drainage obligations.
#### § 702.502 Vocational rehabilitation; action by district directors.

All injury cases which are likely to result in, or have resulted in, permanent disability, and which are of a character likely to require review by a vocational rehabilitation adviser on the staff of the Director, shall promptly be referred to such adviser by the district director or his designee having charge of the case. A form has been prescribed for such purpose and shall be used. Medical data and other pertinent information shall accompany the referral.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0051)

(Pub. L. No. 96-511)

[38 FR 26861, Sept. 26, 1973, as amended at 49 FR 18294, Apr. 30, 1984]
§ 3162.2-1 Drilling and producing obligations. ( a ) The operator, at its election, may drill and produce other wells in conformity with any system of well spacing or production allotments affecting the field or area in which the leased lands are situated, and which is authorized and sanctioned by applicable law or by the authorized officer.
( b ) After notice in writing, the lessee(s) and operating rights owner(s) shall promptly drill and produce such other wells as the authorized officer may reasonably require in order that the lease may be properly and timely developed and produced in accordance with good economic operating practices.
[66 FR 1892, Jan. 10, 2001. Redesignated at 66 FR 1892, Jan. 10, 2001; 66 FR 24073, May 11, 2001]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Alaska fisheries & habitat.
 
Issue 1
Issue 2
Issue 3
 
 
SuDoc Number:I 49.136:
Item Number:0612-Q-18 (online)
CGP System Number:001030454
 
October 4, 2017
 
 **
DOCUMENTS REVIEWED TO DEVELOP THE RECORD OF DECISION

DOCUMENT DATE: August 30, 1982

NUMBER OF PAGES: 66

AUTHOR: Black &Veatch Engineers-Architects

RECIPIENT: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

DOCUMENT TYPE: Draft Report

DOCUMENT TITLE: Description of Current Situation

SEMS DOCUMENT ID: 200550

DOCUMENT DATE: September 21, 1983

NUMBER OF PAGES: 333

AUTHOR: Black &Veatch Engineers-Architects

RECIPIENT: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

DOCUMENT TYPE: Report

DOCUMENT TITLE: Remedial Investigation, Volume I: Summary Report and Volume II: Appendices

SEMS DOCUMENT ID: 200731

DOCUMENT DATE: September 28, 1983

NUMBER OF PAGES: 91

AUTHOR: Black &Veatch Engineers-Architects

RECIPIENT: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

DOCUMENT TYPE: Report

DOCUMENT TITLE: Remedial Feasibility Study, Ellisville Hazardous Waste Disposal Site

SEMS DOCUMENT ID: 200731

DOCUMENT DATE:

NUMBER OF PAGES: 15

AUTHOR: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

RECIPIENT: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

DOCUMENT TYPE: Report

DOCUMENT TITLE: Summary of Remedial Alternative Selection Ellisville Area Site, Rosalie and 

Callahan Properties

SEMS DOCUMENT ID: 30244814
### §1300j–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–323, §5, Sept. 21, 1994, 108 Stat. 2154, which related to adoption of a constitution and bylaws and election of a governing body for the band, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small Business Administration by the Final Order of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, dated July 21, 2004, in Case No. oocv10652 RGS, the United States Small Business Administration hereby revokes the license of The Argonauts MESBIC Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation, to function as a small business investment company under the Small Business Investment Company License No. 01/01-5343 issued to The Argonauts MESBIC Corporation on June 17, 1988 and said license is hereby declared null and void as of September 21, 2004.

Dated: September 24, 2004.
      ( print page 58573)    
United States Small Business Administration.

Jeffrey D. Pierson, 

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 04-21998 Filed 9-29-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
### §1773f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–41, §8, June 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 87, which related to funds for economic development and land acquisition, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**FORM 10-Q**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

 

**(Mark One)**

|   | (X) | **QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934               ** |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007**

 

**OR**

 

|   | (  ) | **TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934               ** |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | **For the transition period** | **to** |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|

 

**Commission file number****1-11394**

 

**MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.**

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

| **Delaware**                    | **95-3863205**      |
|---------------------------------|---------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer    |
| incorporation or organization)  | Identification No.) |

 

| **402 West County Road D, St. Paul, Minnesota** | **55112**  |
|-------------------------------------------------|------------|
| (Address of principal executive offices)        | (Zip Code) |

 

Registrant's telephone number including area code:**(651) 636-7466**

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

|   | Yes [ X ] | No [ | ] |
|--------|-----------|------|---|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

| Large accelerated filer [ | ] | Accelerated filer [ | ] | Non-accelerated filer  [ X ] |
|---------------------------|---|---------------------|---|------------------------------|

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). 

|   | Yes [ | ] | No [ X ] |
|--------|-------|---|----------|

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

 

| Class                                   |   | Outstanding at April 16, 2007 |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Common Stock, $0.15 par value per share |   | 8,216,077                     |

 

 

----
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN MEDINA BUENO

,

Appellant,

v.

T HE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 211

- CR

Appeal from the

292 nd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC# F

- 1160087

- V )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter ’ s request for an extension of time within

which to file the Reporter ’ s Record until January 1 5 , 201 6

. NO FURTHER REQUESTS

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER ’ S RECORD WILL BE

CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Kelly Simmons , Court Reporter for the 292 nd District Court

,

for Dallas County, Texas, prepare the Reporter ’ s Record for the above styled and numbered

cause, and forward the same to this Court on or before Janua ry 1 5

, 201 6

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2 9 th day of December , 2015

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
#### § 27.4 Assurances.

Every application for a permit, right-of-way, public land order, or other Federal authorization to which this part applies, filed after the effective date of these regulations, and every contract covered hereunder to provide goods, services or facilities in the amount of $10,000 or more to the recipient of any Federal authorization to which this part applies, must contain an assurance that the recipient, contractor, or subcontractor does not and will not maintain any facilities in a segregated manner, and that all requirements imposed by or pursuant to section 403 of PubLic Law 93-153 shall be met, and that it will require a similar assurance in every subcontract over $10,000. The assurances shall be in a form specified by the Department Compliance Officer.
§ 1864.0-5 Definitions. As used in this subpart, the term: ( a ) *Authorized officer* means any employee of the Bureau of Land Management who has been delegated the authority to perform the duties described in this subpart.
( b ) *Accreted lands* have the meaning imparted to them by applicable law. In general, they are lands that have been gradually and imperceptibly formed along the banks of a body of water by deposition of water-borne soil.
( c ) *Avulsed lands* have the meaning imparted to them by applicable law. In general, they are lands that have been uncovered by a relatively sudden change in alignment of the channel of a river, or by a comparable change in some other body of water, or that remain as uplands following such a change, or that are located in the bed of the new channel.
( d ) *Actual shoreline* means the line which is washed by the water wherever it covers the bed of a body of water at its mean high water level.
( e ) *Lands* means lands and interests in lands now or formerly forming a part of the reserved or unreserved public lands of the contiguous 48 States and Alaska and as to any coastal State, includes submerged lands inside of the seaward boundary of the State.
( f ) *Meander line* means a survey line established for the purpose of representing the location of the actual shoreline of a permanent natural body of water, without showing all the details of its windings and irregularities. A meander line rarely runs straight for any substantial distance. It is established not as a boundary line but in order to permit calculation of the quantity of lands in the fractional sections remaining after segregation of the water area.
( g ) *Relicted lands* have the meaning imparted that term by applicable law. In general, they are lands gradually uncovered when water recedes permanently.
( h ) *State* means “the state and any of its creations including any governmental instrumentality within a state, including cities, counties, or other official local governmental entities.”
[49 FR 35299, Sept. 6, 1984, as amended at 68 FR 502, Jan. 6, 2003]
Exhibit 31.1SERVICER CERTIFICATIONI, Mike L. Wilhelms, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Triad Automobile Receivables Trust2006-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer and based on myknowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the Servicer compliance statementrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Requlation AB, and except as disclosed in the ExchangeAct periodic reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Sale and ServicingAgreement in all material respects; and5. All the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item1122 of Requlation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.Date: March 30, 2007Triad Financial Corporation   /s/ Mike L. Wilhelms   Mike L. Wilhelms  Senior Vice President and CFO
### §450e–1. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 450e–1 was editorially reclassified as section 5308 of this title.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20251

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL SOSA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-486-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Samuel Sosa-Hernandez

has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sosa-Hernandez

received a copy of counsel’s motion but filed no response. 

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 231

 233

 237

 245

 250

 251

 251

 257

 246

 247

 242

 239

 236

 233

 232

 237

 232

 219

 215

 212

 236

 223

 212

 215

 205

 199

 195

 196

 197

 0

 0

 216

 220

 231

 233

 242

 241

 234

 224

 220

 217

 218

 219

 206

 204

 210

 201

 189

 186

 180

 181

 177

 176

 176

 175

 176

 168

 177

 180

 179

 0

 0

 224

 228

 233

 238

 244

 247

 243

 239

 236

 235

 232

 230

 224

 224

 221

 220

 209

 202

 197

 193

 200

 194

 191

 191

 188

 185

 185

 188

 188

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### § 2866.38 Can I combine multiple grants for facilities located at one site into a single grant?

If you hold grants for two or more facilities on the same communications site, you may submit an SF-299 application and be subject to cost recovery for the BLM to authorize those facilities under a single grant. The highest value use in all the combined facilities determines the base rent. The BLM then charges for each remaining use in the combined facilities at 25 percent of the rent from the rent schedule. These uses include those uses the BLM previously calculated as base rents when the BLM authorized each of the facilities on an individual basis.