alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TABLE 38
 
                          UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR - BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
 
                                                 SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY
                                                      STREAMFLOW DATA
                                                              1995
 
MEAN MONTHLY FLOW IN CFS
 
                             JAN    FEB    MAR    APR    MAY    JUN    JUL    AUG    SEP    OCT    NOV    DEC
 
SACRAMENTO RIVER
 
  SHASTA INFLOW (COMPUTED) 34676  15325  38768  20669  17834   8513   5331   4067   3825   4090   3730   8150
  AT KESWICK DAM           14590  17974  35840  17760  17610  13160  14620  14240  11030   5450   5010   4880
  AT BEND BRIDGE           36660  27015  51760  22960  21700  14540  15280  14780  12390   6820   6280   9990
  AT ORD FERRY             66210  35460  72050  27680  26720  13290  12600  11440   9530   5800   5700  11980
  AT COLUSA                33770  27120  31140  26670  25060  13860  12530  11320  10120   6370   5990  11890
  BELOW WILKINS SLOUGH     23430  22380  24950  22380  20560  13800  11900  10670  10260   6480   6010  11630
  AT VERONA                51880  52420  59270  54040  51520  35790  22550  19290  22110  13100  11610  23200
  AT SACRAMENTO "I" ST     60900  57110  70490  59390  61910  38080  31450  21550  25510  16060  14070  24510
 
 
MISCELLANEOUS STATIONS
 
  AMERICAN R. FOLSOM INFLO 13670   6110  18470  10840  14070  11130   5640   2710   2230   1740   1300   2700
  AMERICAN R. AT NIMBUS DA  8550   8550   5580  17830   7830  14220   7310  10900   2880   3710   2860   2500
  KINGS R. AT PINE FLAT DA    50     50    735   6310   9620   8120   9930   6570   3160   2510    200    200
 
 
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
 
  AT FRIANT DAM               50    380   3710   5730   7350   2630   5270    470    200    170    140     90
  NEAR VERNALIS             4550   6740  14530  19950  22120  14216  10350   4780   5060   5740   2680   2520
 
PUTAH CREEK
  MONTICELLO INFLOW (COMP)  7529    882   6140    847    623    108    -12    -63    -29    -30    -45   1030
  PUTAH CREEK-LAKE SOLANO    209     42    354     10     10     11     19     20     20     20     20     46
 
STANISLAUS RIVER
 
  NEW MELONES INFLOW        3022   1922   5145   3968   6420   6697   4290   1371   1155   1070    640    960
  AT TULLOCH DAM             478    285    511   1068   2923   1986   1727   1906   1525   1058    298    296
  AT ORANGE BLOSSOM          611    252    663    894   1385    504    250    264    248    407    339    234
 
 
*  Data supplied by Central Valley Operations Coordinations Office
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-02-15T02:23:29-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
# OHSS | Office of Homeland Security Statistics

# LPR Population Estimates

The reports below present estimates of the lawful permanent resident (LPR) population living in the United States on January 1 of the given year. LPRs, also known as “green card” holders, are immigrants who have been granted lawful permanent residence in the United States but have not yet become U.S. citizens. Estimates of the total LPR population and the LPR population eligible to apply to naturalize are tabulated by country of birth, state of residence, and the year LPR status was obtained. Data for the estimates were obtained primarily from administrative records of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services of the Department of Homeland Security.

Return to main LPR page for more resources.

Return to immigration topic page.

Return to top

                -  Data & Reports by Topic 
                -  About Our Data 
                -  About OHSS 
                -  Glossary 

Email:ohssweb@hq.dhs.gov

OHSS.DHS.gov

								An official website of the								U.S. Department of Homeland Security

                    -  About OHSS 
                    -  Accessibility 
                    -  FOIA Requests 
                    -  Privacy Policy 
                    -  DHS.gov
#### Dorothy Engle, Respondent, v. William H. Ferrier, Appellant, et al., Defendants. Mary C. Bangs, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Isabelle E. Bangs, Respondent, v. William H. Ferrier, Appellant.

These are appeals *1042by the defendant-appellant, William H. Perrier, from judgments of the Supreme Court entered in the office of the Clerk of Chemung County on the 5th and 4th days of November, 1947, in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant, and from orders denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdicts of the jury and for a new trial in the above-entitled actions. These actions arose from an accident in which two cars collided on State Route No. 14 in the county of Yates, nine miles north of Watkins Glen. The accident occurred about 1:00 *pm.*The plaintiffs were passengers in the car being operated by 0. Ernest Bangs, who hired the car from the defendant Standard Operating Service, Inc. The defendant’s car was being operated by Dr. Perrier in whose car were the passengers, Dr. .and Mrs. Allen. The plaintiffs contend that while they were proceeding in a northerly direction on the east side of the road that the Perrier car was proceeding in a southerly direction on his side of the road and collided with their car while on the east side of the highway. Dr. Perrier and his witnesses testified that while he was driving southerly on the west side of the highway, the Bangs car crossed diagonally from the east side to the west side of the highway and struck his car. It was a cold, windy day; the snow was swirling on the road and there were spots of ice on the highway. The conflicting evidence presented by the plaintiffs and the defendant was a clear question of fact for the jury. Judgments and orders appealed from are affirmed, with separate_bills of costs to respondents. Heffernan, Brewster and Russell, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Poster, J., dissent and vote for reversal and a new trial. [See 274 App. Div. 831.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 256

 235

 258

 283

 292

 297

 313

 303

 319

 349

 378

 409

 437

 436

 408

 380

 357

 345

 365

 358

 353

 347

 349

 356

 356

 343

 343

 341

 323

 315

 226

 222

 224

 258

 274

 289

 296

 287

 288

 310

 337

 373

 401

 407

 362

 355

 326

 319

 335

 337

 332

 333

 333

 334

 337

 318

 322

 312

 308

 304

 239

 229

 237

 269

 285

 293

 301

 296

 307

 327

 357

 388

 414

 424

 378

 370

 337

 332

 350

 349

 342

 341

 340

 345

 345

 331

 332

 323

 315

 309

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### In the Matter of Adolph G. Maier, Appellant, against Edward H. Leete et al., Constituting the Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 7, Town of Greenburgh, County of Westchester, Respondents.

Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report) of MCG Capital Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael R. McDonnell, the Chief Financial
Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    MICHAEL R.
MCDONNELLName:

Michael R. McDonnellDate:

February 28, 2007
377 P.2d 962

#### Cletus A. WENDLER, Petitioner, v. The FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, SANTA FE COUNTY, Santa Fe, New Mexico, et al., Respondents.

No. 18 HC.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Jan. 29, 1963.

COMPTON, Chief Justice, and CAR-MOD Y, CHAVEZ, NOBLE and MOISE, Justices, concurring.

Ordered that the request for free process be and the same is hereby granted and the petition for writ of mandamus be and the same is hereby denied for the reason the petition is premature under existing facts and circumstances.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 541

 529

 510

 587

 566

 577

 586

 649

 739

 792

 822

 849

 860

 899

 901

 883

 858

 860

 884

 904

 908

 812

 782

 771

 822

 837

 837

 832

 815

 774

 904

 494

 510

 478

 515

 497

 524

 553

 551

 655

 742

 784

 821

 837

 856

 763

 854

 817

 812

 845

 863

 813

 766

 734

 735

 767

 803

 812

 791

 728

 728

 704

 516

 520

 492

 555

 527

 561

 571

 592

 697

 772

 803

 837

 846

 875

 878

 874

 843

 831

 865

 880

 881

 785

 764

 753

 799

 816

 824

 808

 779

 751

 795

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 22,670

 22,336

 21,938

 21,569

 21,171

 20,854

 20,540

 20,246

 20,029

 19,892

 19,977

 20,130

 20,319

 20,538

 20,813

 21,087

 21,267

 21,383

 21,504

 21,624

 21,737

 21,741

 21,699

 21,648

 21,665

 21,720

 21,844

 22,040

 22,181

 22,295

 22,574

 756

 745

 731

 719

 706

 695

 685

 675

 668

 663

 666

 671

 677

 685

 694

 703

 709

 713

 717

 721

 725

 725

 723

 722

 722

 724

 728

 735

 739

 743

 752

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### Phantom 2 Vision + Specs.

0 °C - 40 °C **SENSOR SIZE** 1/2.3" **EFFECTIVE PIXELS**  14 Megapixels **RESOLUTION** 4384×3288 **HD RECORDING** 1080p30 & 720p **RECORDING FOV**  110° / 85°



## Rem ote Control **OPERATING FREQUENCY**

5.728 GHz - 5.85 GHz **COMMUNICATION DISTAN CE (OPEN AREA)**  CE Com pliance: 400m; FCC Compliance: 800m **RECEIVER SENSITIVITY (1%PER)** 

- 93dBm **TRANSMITTER POWER** CE Compliance: 25mW; FCC Compliance: 100mW **WORKING VOLTAGE** 120 mA@3.7V **BUILT -**  **IN LIPO BATTERY WORK ING CURRENT/CAPACITY**  3.7V, 2000mAh 

## Range Extender **OPERATING FREQUENCY** 

2412 - 2462MHz **COMMUNICATION DISTAN CE (OPEN AREA)**  500 - 700m **TRANSMITTER POWER**20dBm **POWER CONSUMPTION** 2W 

## DJI VISION App **SYSTEM REQUIREMENT O F MOBILE DEVICE** 

iOS version 6.1 or above/ Android system version 4.0 or above **MOBILE DEVICE SUPPOR T** 

 iOS recommended: iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPod touch 5 (available but not recommended: iPad 3, iPad 4, iPad mini)  Android recommended: Samsung Galaxy S3, S4, Note 2, Note 3 or phones of similar configurationCOMPARE PHANTOM 2 S ERIES

Com pare Now DJI OFFICIAL STORE

Buy from the DJI Official Store Buy Now DJI AUTHORIZED DEALE RSBuy from DJI authorized dealers

Find a local dealer HELP AND SUPPORT

 Wiki  Downloads  Support  After - sales Service Policies <img height="1" w idth="1" border="0" alt="" src="http://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/viewthroughconversion/963704061/?frame=0&random=143776483 7695&cv=7&fst=1437764837695&num=1&fmt=1&guid=ON&u_h=900&u_w=1440&u_ah=860&u_aw=1440&u_ cd=24&u_his=7&u_tz= - 240&u_ java=true&u_nplug=0&u_nmime=0&frm=0&url=http%3A//www.dji.com/product/phantom - 2 - vision plus/spec&ref=http%3A//www.dji.com/product/phantom - 2 - vision - plus" />
### §4235. Annual allocation

For each fiscal year, the Secretary shall allocate any amounts made available for assistance under this subchapter for the fiscal year, in accordance with the formula established pursuant to section 4236 of this title to the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands if the Department complies with the requirements under this subchapter for a grant under this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VIII, §816, as added Pub. L. 106–568, title II, §203, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2890, and Pub. L. 106–569, title V, §513, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2984.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 106–568, §203, and Pub. L. 106–569, §513, enacted identical sections 816 of Pub. L. 104–330. This section is based on the text of section 816 of Pub. L. 104–330, as added by Pub. L. 106–569, §513.
### SUBCHAPTER LXXXIII—AUBURN INDIAN RESTORATION
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 508.72

 508.63

 508.66

 508.91

 508.60

 508.84

 508.74

 508.93

 508.97

 508.99

 509.03

 509.06

 508.12

 508.66

 509.02

 508.94

 508.69

 508.63

 508.72

 508.60

 508.32

 507.79

 507.40

 507.36

 506.89

 506.74

 506.44

 506.02

 506.08

 505.99

 65,375

 65,265

 65,301

 65,609

 65,228

 65,523

 65,400

 65,634

 65,683

 65,708

 65,757

 65,795

 64,637

 65,301

 65,745

 65,646

 65,338

 65,265

 65,375

 65,228

 64,883

 64,234

 63,762

 63,713

 63,146

 62,967

 62,608

 62,107

 62,179

 62,071

STORAGE

+307

-110

+36

+308

-381

+295

-123

+234

+49

+25

+49

+38

-1,158

+664

+444

-99

-308

-73

+110

-147

-345

-649

-472

-49

-567

-179

-359

-501

+72

-108

CHANGE

1,981

1,662

1,693

1,909

1,575

1,892

1,690

1,851

1,717

1,684

1,600

1,544

924

1,793

1,681

1,320

1,133

1,218

1,302

1,228

1,137

919

981

1,231

1,026

1,241

1,178

1,081

1,335

1,137

INFLOW

 1,811

 1,699

 1,660

 1,741

 1,752

 1,731

 1,740

 1,719

 1,683

 1,660

 1,567

 1,513

 1,493

 1,442

 1,441

 1,356

 1,287

 1,247

 1,241

 1,292

 1,300

 1,235

 1,207

 1,246

 1,300

 1,318

 1,347

 1,326

 1,292

 1,182

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 15

 18

 15

 13

 15

 12

 12

 14

 9

 11

 8

 12

 15

 16

 16

 14

 1

 8

 6

 10

 11

 11

 12

 10

 12

 13

 12

 8

 7

 9

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2019 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 10/01/2019

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -2,997 42,663 43,828 0 0 345

ACRE-FEET -2,997 84,622 86,933 0 0 684

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 86,933

SPILL 0 86,933

 65,068

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,979

 1,655

 1,688

 1,907

 1,555

 1,893

 1,684

 1,852

 1,713

 1,685

 1,598

 1,549

 1,228

 1,477

 1,667

 1,313

 1,138

 1,214

 1,319

 1,229

 1,138

 925

 976

 1,237

 1,032

 1,237

 1,185

 1,084

 1,334

 1,138

 42,629

 84,555

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
- 65294.001
- 65294.002
- 65294.003
- 65294.005
- 58-561_070
- 58-561_071
- 58-561_080
- 58-561_081
- 58-561_082
- 58-561_083
- 58-561_084
- 58-561_085
- 58-561_194
- 58-561_195
- 58-561_220
- 58-561_221
- 58-561_222
- 58-561_232
- 58-561_238
- 58-561_239
- 58-561_240
- 58-561_241
- 58-561_242
- 58-561_243
- 58-561_244
- 58-561_245
- 58-561_246
- 58-561_282
- 58-561_283
- 58-561_284
- 65294.BC
- BLANK

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-01-28T13:59:06-0500
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
**Exhibit
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      have
      issued our report dated March 30, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial
      statements in the Annual Report of 1 st Constitution Bancorp on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We
      hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
      Registration Statements of 1 st Constitution Bancorp on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-132474, effective March 16,
      2006, and 333-98177, effective August 15, 2002).








**/s/
      GRANT THORNTON LLP**





Philadelphia,
      Pennsylvania


March
      30,
      2007
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Larry Matheson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Acorn Holding Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); andc. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the small business issuer’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financialreporting.6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regardto significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.Date: October 21, 2005       /s/ Larry J. Matheson         The person performing the function of    Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### §§ 17.214-17.215 [Reserved]
#### § 30.201 May I file a claim in a summary probate proceeding?

No. Claims may not be filed in summary probate proceedings.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AMARILLO

MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

To the 13th District Court of Navarro County, Greeting:

BEFORE our Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, on January 29,

2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Michael David Williams v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 07-14-00128-CR Trial Court Number: D34,123-CR

was determined and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated January 29, 2015, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the trial court is modified as set forth in the

opinion and affirmed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have already been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of said Court of

Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things to have it duly

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Honorable Justices of our said Court, with the seal thereof

annexed, at the City of Amarillo on June 3, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
**Exhibit 10.26**

**AMENDMENT TO THE MCG CAPITAL CORPORATION**

**SUPPLEMENTAL NON-QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2005**

**WHEREAS**, MCG Capital Corporation (the “Employer”) established the MCG Capital Corporation Supplemental Non-Qualified Retirement Plan as amended and restated as of January 1, 2005 (the“Plan”) for the exclusive benefit of certain executive employees of the Employer; 

**WHEREAS**, the Employer has reserved theright to amend the Plan pursuant to Section 9.2 of the Plan; and 

**WHEREAS**, the Employer desires to amend the plan to ensurecompliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. 

**NOW THEREFORE**, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as ofDecember 31, 2008: 

1. Article I shall be amended by (i) renumbering Section 1.12 to Section 1.13 and (ii) inserting the followingas Section 1.12: 

“1.12 **SEPARATION FROM SERVICE** means a separation from service, within the meaning ofSection 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder, with the Employer and all entities required to be treated as a single employer with the Employer under Section 409A of the Code and the regulations thereunder.” 

2. Section 5.3 shall be amended to read as follows: 

“5.3 **TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT.** If a Participant has a Separation from Service, the full value of his or her Compensation Deferral Account shall be valued and payable upon such Separation from Service in accordance withthe provisions of Article VI.” 

3. Section 5.5 shall be amended by deleting the phrase “Prop. Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(g) (or thecorresponding provisions of the final regulations under Code Section 409A)” and replacing it with the phrase “Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(i)(5).” 

4. Section 6.2 shall be amended by (i) replacing the phrase “termination of employment” with the phrase “Separation from Service” and (ii) replacing the phrase “Section5.5” with the phrase “Section 5.3.” 

5. Article X shall be amended by deleting the phrase “Prop. Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(h)(2)(viii)(or the corresponding provision of the final regulations under Code Section 409A)” and replacing it with the phrase “Treas. Reg. §1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix).” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer, by its dulyauthorized officer, has caused this amendment to be duly executed effective as of the 30th day of December, 2008. 

 
MCG CAPITAL CORPORATIONBy: /s/    Steven F. Tunney    Title: Chief Executive OfficerDate: 12/30/08
 

2