alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Kehoe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the period
covered by this report, of MS Structured Asset Corp. on behalf of SATURNS Trust
No. 2001-4;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
and

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and
the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based
upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the depositor and trustee
have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: LaSalle Bank National
Association and its officers and agents.

                                         By:      /s/ JOHN KEHOE
                                            ------------------------------------
                                         Name:    John Kehoe
                                         Title:   Vice President
                                         Date:    March 30, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Joel Landrick Ard, Jr., Ardco Construction, Inc., and Ard Foundation

v. Renee Carrington

Appellate case number: 01-13-00067-CV

Trial court case number: 1219985

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

Appellant Joel Landrick Ard, Jr., proceeding pro se, has filed a brief signed by himself only, 

purporting to be on behalf of himself and on behalf of appellants Ardco Construction, Inc. and 

Ard Foundation. Ard attaches documents to his brief indicating that Ardco Construction, Inc. 

and Ard Foundation are corporations. 

Texas courts have consistently held that a non-attorney may not appear pro se on behalf of a 

corporation. Corona v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corp., 245 S.W.3d 75, 79 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2008, 

pet. denied); see Kunstoplast of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA, 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 

(Tex. 1996). A corporation may be represented only by a licensed attorney in the prosecution of 

its appeal. See Moore v. Elektro-Mobil Technik GmbH, 874 S.W.2d 324, 327 (Tex. App.—El 

Paso 1994, writ denied).

Accordingly, if each corporation desires to prosecute its appeal, Ardco Construction, Inc., and 

Ard Foundation must retain licensed counsel to represent them. Any attorney retained to

represent Ardco Construction, Inc. and Ard Foundation in this appeal must make an appearance 

by filing a notice of representation with the Clerk of this Court by October 11, 2013. If such 

notice of representation is not filed, Ardco Construction, Inc.’s and Ard Foundation’s appeal will

be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c); see also MHL Homebuilder LLC v. 

Dabal/Graphic Resource, No. 14–05–00295–CV, 2005 WL 1404475 (Tex. App.—Houston 

[14th Dist.] June 16, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.).
In addition, appellants’ brief filed on August 26, 2013 is stricken. Appellant Joel Landrick 

Ard, Jr. may file an amended appellant’s brief acting pro se on behalf of himself only. An 

amended briefing schedule will be set once it is determined whether Ardco Construction, Inc. 

and Ard Foundation will be retaining counsel to represent them in this Court or whether their

appeals will be dismissed. 

It is so ORDERED.

Justice’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually 

Date: September 9, 2013
### §1952. Rules and regulations

Within one hundred and eighty days after November 8, 1978, the Secretary shall promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 95–608, title III, §302, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3077.)
### §1615. Continuing education allowances

In order to encourage scholarship and stipend recipients under sections 1613a, 1614, and 1616h of this title and health professionals, including community health representatives and emergency medical technicians, to join or continue in an Indian health program and to provide services in the rural and remote areas in which a significant portion of Indians reside, the Secretary, acting through the Service, may—

(1) provide programs or allowances to transition into an Indian health program, including licensing, board or certification examination assistance, and technical assistance in fulfilling service obligations under sections 1613a, 1614, and 1616h of this title; and

(2) provide programs or allowances to health professionals employed in an Indian health program to enable those professionals, for a period of time each year prescribed by regulation of the Secretary, to take leave of the duty stations of the professionals for professional consultation, management, leadership, and refresher training courses.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title I, §106, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1404; Pub. L. 100–713, title I, §105, Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4787; Pub. L. 102–573, title I, §§104(a), 115, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4533, 4543; Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–148 is based on section 134(c) of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.

#### Amendments

2010—Pub. L. 111–148 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to discretionary allowances to health professionals employed in the Service to take leave for professional consultation and refresher training courses and included a limitation on use of appropriations to establish postdoctoral training programs for health professionals.

1992—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–573, §104(a), inserted "nurses," after "physicians, dentists,".

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 102–573, §115, amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this section—

"(1) $500,000 for fiscal year 1989,

"(2) $526,300 for fiscal year 1990,

"(3) $553,800 for fiscal year 1991, and

"(4) $582,500 for fiscal year 1992."

1988—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–713 amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "There are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of this section: $100,000 for fiscal year 1978, $200,000 for fiscal year 1979, and $250,000 for fiscal year 1980. For fiscal years 1981, 1982, 1983, and 1984 there are authorized to be appropriated for the purpose of this section such sums as may be specifically authorized by an Act enacted after this chapter."
### §284. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 13, 1892, ch. 164, §1, 27 Stat. 143, which related to issuance and enforcement of regulations by the Commissioner of Indian Affairs to secure attendance of Indian children at school, was omitted as obsolete in view of the enactment of section 282 of this title, which provides that the Secretary of the Interior now issue and enforce such regulations. See section 282 of this title.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLow-Pressure Gas Effects on the Potency of an Electron Beam Against Ceramic ClothAn 8-kv electron beam with a current in the neighborhood of 100 mA from the Ukrainian space welding "Universal Hand Tool" (UHT) burned holes in Nextel AF-62 ceramic cloth designed to withstand temperatures up to 1,427 C. The burnthrough time was on the order of 8 scc at standoff distances between UHT and cloth ranging from 6-24 in. At both closer (2 in.) and farther (48 in.) standoff distances the potency of the beam against the cloth declined and the burnthrough time went up significantly. Prior to the test it had been expected that the beam would lay down a static charge on the cloth and be deflected without damaging the cloth. The burnthrough is thought to be an effect of partial transmission of beam power by a stream of positive ions generated by the high-voltage electron beam from contaminant gas in the "vacuum" chamber. A rough quantitative theoretical computation appears to substantiate this possibility.Document ID20000010545Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNunes, A. C., Jr.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Russell, C. K.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Zimmerman, F. R.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Fragomeni, J. M.*(Ohio Univ. Athens, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1999Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberM-951NASA/TM-1999-209762NAS 1.15:209762Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000010545.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §4714. Feasibility study of training programs in sizable Hispanic populations

No later than December 15, 1985, the Director of the United States Information Agency and the Administrator of the Agency for International Development shall report jointly, to the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, on the feasibility of greater utilization in those two agencies' scholarship and participant training programs of the United States universities in States bordering Latin American and Caribbean 1 which are located in areas characterized by the presence of sizable Hispanic populations.

(Pub. L. 99–93, title VI, §614, Aug. 16, 1985, 99 Stat. 444.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

United States Information Agency (other than Broadcasting Board of Governors and International Broadcasting Bureau) abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of State, see sections 6531 and 6532 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be "Latin America and the Caribbean".
#### § 2568.114 How do I apply for an alternative allotment if the CSU manager determines my application is inconsistent with a CSU?

You should contact the appropriate CSU manager as quickly as possible to discuss resource concerns, potential constraints, and impacts on existing management plans. After you do this you must file a request for an alternative allotment with the BLM Alaska State Office as stated in section 2568.71 and follow all the requirements of the original allotment application. If the alternative allotment land is also in the CSU, the CSU manager will evaluate it to determine if conveyance of an allotment there would be inconsistent with the CSU as well.
### §6210. Preservation of American jobs

It is the sense of the Congress that the Director of the United States Information Agency and the Chairman of the Board for International Broadcasting should, in developing the plan for consolidation and reorganization of overseas international broadcasting services, limit, to the maximum extent feasible, consistent with the purposes of the consolidation, elimination of any United States-based positions and should affirmatively seek to transfer as many positions as possible to the United States.

(Pub. L. 103–236, title III, §311, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 444.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

United States Information Agency (other than Broadcasting Board of Governors and International Broadcasting Bureau) abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of State, see sections 6531 and 6532 of this title.
§ 2.69 How will a bureau handle a request for federally-funded research data? ( a ) If you request research data that were used by the Federal Government in developing certain kinds of agency actions, and the research data relate to published research findings produced under an award, in accordance with OMB Circular A-110: ( 1 ) If the bureau was the awarding agency, it will request the research data from the recipient;
( 2 ) The recipient must provide the research data within a reasonable time; and
( 3 ) The bureau will review the research data to see if it can be released under the FOIA.
( b ) If the bureau obtains the research data solely in response to your FOIA request, the bureau may charge you a reasonable fee equaling the full incremental cost of obtaining the research data. ( 1 ) This fee should reflect costs incurred by the agency, the recipient, and applicable subrecipients.
( 2 ) This fee is in addition to any fees the agency may assess under the FOIA.
( c ) The bureau will forward a copy of the request to the recipient, who is responsible for searching for and reviewing the requested information in accordance with these FOIA regulations. The recipient will forward a copy of any responsive records that are located, along with any recommendations concerning the releasability of the data, and the total cost incurred in searching for, reviewing, and providing the data.
( d ) The bureau will review and consider the recommendations of the recipient regarding the releasability of the requested research data. However, the bureau, not the recipient, is responsible for deciding whether the research data will be released or withheld.
(No. 719

Claimant awarded $28,041.34.)

#### American Brake Shoe and Foundry Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Franchise *tax*— refund, *for overpayment may he awarded.*Where there is an overpayment, under protest, of a franchise tax and initial fees by a corporation, the court may on grounds of social justice and equity enter an award in favor of claimant for the overpayment. (Iseo *Go.*v. *State,*4, C. C. Rep. 171.) ’ ■ *

Whitman & Miller, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Edward C. Fitch, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case comes before the court on declaration filed by claimant, in which it alleges that in the year 1920 it paid to the State of Illinois the sum of $6302.75, under protest, for franchise tax claimed to be due from it by the State of Illinois on 400,000 no par value shares of common stock; that said sum was unlawfully collected from claimant by the Secretary of State of the State of Illinois; overpayment of franchise tax for the year ending June 30, 1921, $6324.91; overpayment of franchise tax for year ending June 30, 1922, $7438.88; overpayment of initial fee for 1921, $1136.13; overpayment of franchise tax for the year ending June 30, 1923, $6,838.67; making a total overpayment of initial fees and franchise taxes made by claimant to the Secretary of State of Illinois, under protest and duress, of $28,041.34.

The demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is sustained, as a matter of law.

On the grounds of social justice and equity, we award claimant the sum of $28,041.34.
#### § 2568.78 Will my application segregate the land for which I am applying from other applications or land actions?

The filing of an application with a sufficient description to identify the lands will segregate those lands. “Segregation” has the same meaning as in 43 CFR 2091.0-5(b).
### §2209. Trusteeship title of United States for any Indian or Indian tribe

Title to any land acquired under this chapter by any Indian or Indian tribe shall be taken in trust by the United States for that Indian or Indian tribe.

(Pub. L. 97–459, title II, §210, Jan. 12, 1983, 96 Stat. 2519.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 498.47

 498.21

 498.59

 498.80

 498.99

 499.43

 500.01

 500.42

 500.45

 500.51

 500.15

 499.82

 499.47

 499.12

 499.37

 499.28

 499.38

 499.47

 499.19

 499.55

 499.58

 499.63

 499.65

 499.86

 500.21

 500.37

 500.58

 500.44

 500.85

 500.87

 500.63

 53,679

 53,406

 53,805

 54,026

 54,225

 54,695

 55,314

 55,758

 55,791

 55,856

 55,466

 55,111

 54,737

 54,364

 54,631

 54,535

 54,641

 54,737

 54,439

 54,823

 54,855

 54,908

 54,930

 55,154

 55,531

 55,704

 55,932

 55,780

 56,224

 56,246

 55,986

STORAGE

-600

-273

+399

+221

+199

+470

+619

+444

+33

+65

-390

-355

-374

-373

+267

-96

+106

+96

-298

+384

+32

+53

+22

+224

+377

+173

+228

-152

+444

+22

-260

CHANGE

108

84

427

334

319

456

531

443

237

260

23

40

30

30

353

170

272

268

68

415

233

247

227

329

407

303

333

574

577

242

251

INFLOW

 405

 221

 222

 222

 218

 217

 218

 219

 219

 220

 218

 217

 217

 217

 217

 217

 217

 218

 218

 218

 216

 215

 214

 214

 215

 215

 215

 647

 349

 229

 380

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 5

 1

 4

 1

 1

 2

 1

 0

 1

 7

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 0

 3

 1

 5

 2

 2

 2

 1

 3

 4

 4

 2

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2022 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/23/2022

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,707 8,591 7,664 0 0 67

ACRE-FEET +1,707 17,040 15,202 0 0 133

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 15,202

SPILL 0 15,202

 54,279

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 30

 30

 365

 307

 289

 435

 513

 421

 219

 244

 31

 30

 26

 25

 342

 163

 279

 264

 70

 389

 244

 237

 259

 284

 412

 292

 318

 559

 565

 233

 234

 8,109

 16,084

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle travel map. SanIsabel National Forest. Salida Ranger District, Colorado**
 
2017
 
SuDoc:A 13.28:SA 5 I/11/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:001028688
 
November 27, 2017
#### § 20.505 Habitual use of intoxicants.

An employee who habitually uses intoxicants to excess may be subject to removal (5 U.S.C. 7352).
Supplement A: Physical Characteristics of New England Safety Partners, LLC’s, UAS

To whom it may concern:

Please find in this document specifications related to the UAS subject to consideration for Exemption. 

All specifications are given by the manufacturer. It is of note that these specifications in some instances 

constitute the maximal values discovered by the manufacturer and averaged over several test units. 

NESP utilizes these metrics when forming safe and sustainable flight operations and in no way do the 

specification extrema contained herein constitute normal NESP flight patterns.

I. General

Manufacturer Details:

Manufacturer: Horizon Hobby

Model: Blade 350 QX2 AP

Website: www.horizonhobbycorp.com 

Contact: 217-352-1913

II. Physical Characteristics:

a. Frame:

Length: 465mm

Width: 465mm

Height: 203mm

Weight: 1006g

b. Motor

a. 4x Brushless Outrunner Motor, 1100Kv

c. Electronic Speed Controller:

a. Spektrum BLH7801A ASX3 DSMX Compatible Receiver Board

d. Propellers:

a. 4x ABS Propellers

b. Main Rotor Diameter 580mm

e. Flight Parameters:

a. Flight timer enabled Transmitter (Spektrum DX8)

b. Real time telemetry module installed

i. Real time barometric altitude telemetry module 

ii. Real time battery voltage for monitoring battery power monitor

iii. Real time temperature monitor
§ 2741.3 Preapplication consultation. ( a ) Potential applicants should contact the appropriate District Office of the Bureau of Land Management well in advance of the anticipated submission of an application. Early consultation is needed to familiarize a potential applicant with management responsibilities and terms and conditions which may be required in a lease or patent.
( b ) Any information furnished by the applicant in connection with preapplication activity or use, which he/she requests not be disclosed, shall be protected to the extent consistent with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
( c ) Dependent upon the magnitude and/or public interest associated with the proposed use, various investigations, studies, analyses, public meetings and negotiations may be required of the applicant prior to the submission of the application. Where a determination is made that studies and analyses are required, the authorized officer shall inform the potential applicant of these requirements.
( d ) The potential applicant may be permitted to go upon the public lands to perform casual acts related to data collection necessary for development of an acceptable plan of development as required in § 2741.4(b) of this title. These casual acts include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Vehicle use on existing roads;
( 2 ) Sampling;
( 3 ) Surveys required for siting of structures or other improvements; and
( 4 ) Other activities which do not unduly disturb surface resources. If, however, the authorized officer determines that appreciable impacts to surface resources may occur, he/she may require the potential applicant to obtain a land use authorization permit with appropriate terms and conditions under the provision of part 2920 of this title.
[50 FR 50300, Dec. 10, 1985]