alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL BASHKIN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

MICHAEL J. HICKMAN, an individual;

et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-55455

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-00995-LABCAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Paul Bashkin appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 action challenging a state court decision declaring

him a vexatious litigant. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

FILED

JAN 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-55455

de novo. Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003) (jurisdictional

dismissal under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine); Shanks v. Dressel, 540 F.3d 1082,

1086 (9th Cir. 2008) (dismissal for failure to state a claim). We affirm. 

The district court properly concluded that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine

barred Bashkin’s action to the extent that he challenged the vexatious litigant order

and any other state court orders and judgments, because the action is a “forbidden

de facto appeal” of state court judgments, and raises constitutional claims that are

“inextricably intertwined” with those prior state court judgments. Noel, 341 F.3d

at 1158. Contrary to Bashkin’s argument, “Rooker-Feldman applies where the

plaintiff in federal court claims that the state court did not have jurisdiction to

render a judgment.” Doe v. Mann, 415 F.3d 1038, 1043 n.6 (9th Cir. 2005). 

The district court properly dismissed the due process claims because the

record shows that Bashkin received due process prior to the state court’s entry of

the vexatious litigant order. See Shanks, 540 F.3d at 1090 (elements of procedural

due process claim).

Bashkin’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Hans B. Lewinsky for Admission to the Bar.

Present — Peek, P. J., G-lennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
#### Agnes C. Anderson, Appellant, v. William H. Hinrichs et al., Respondents.

*864Present— Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1
           Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries
            Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a - 14(a) OF THE
          SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rodney M. Tiede, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadcast
International, Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    b.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c.  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a.  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: August 11, 2006

/s/ Rodney M. Tiede
-----------------------------
Rodney M. Tiede
Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 649

 650

 639

 649

 656

 654

 663

 709

 687

 684

 700

 665

 688

 681

 703

 737

 716

 669

 652

 617

 656

 691

 715

 731

 732

 683

 658

 657

 662

 638

 549

 604

 555

 571

 601

 590

 595

 644

 590

 584

 610

 596

 615

 602

 614

 601

 648

 590

 578

 524

 550

 618

 647

 662

 656

 600

 571

 555

 561

 563

 615

 632

 603

 614

 624

 622

 628

 675

 630

 631

 641

 633

 653

 643

 655

 671

 676

 630

 625

 591

 605

 659

 692

 704

 694

 643

 624

 616

 598

 593

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 18, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 508.59

 508.35

 508.64

 507.64

 508.89

 508.85

 508.52

 508.42

 508.15

 508.38

 508.47

 509.06

 508.00

 508.56

 508.60

 509.01

 508.56

 508.33

 507.84

 507.42

 508.79

 508.76

 509.07

 508.82

 508.68

 509.06

 508.78

 509.04

 509.07

 508.73

 65,215

 64,920

 65,277

 64,053

 65,585

 65,535

 65,129

 65,006

 64,674

 64,957

 65,068

 65,795

 64,489

 65,178

 65,228

 65,732

 65,178

 64,895

 64,295

 63,786

 65,461

 65,425

 65,807

 65,498

 65,326

 65,795

 65,449

 65,770

 65,807

 65,388

STORAGE

+1,138

-295

+357

-1,224

+1,532

-50

-406

-123

-332

+283

+111

+727

-1,306

+689

+50

+504

-554

-283

-600

-509

+1,675

-36

+382

-309

-172

+469

-346

+321

+37

-419

CHANGE

2,650

1,415

2,526

1,907

3,169

2,252

2,082

2,215

1,997

2,733

2,601

2,868

1,792

2,682

2,230

2,292

2,038

2,216

3,292

3,657

3,765

2,200

2,340

3,214

3,804

4,191

3,759

3,163

2,300

2,018

INFLOW

 2,059

 1,552

 2,291

 2,483

 2,382

 2,262

 2,271

 2,263

 2,150

 2,462

 2,485

 2,479

 2,433

 2,319

 2,191

 2,024

 2,301

 2,342

 2,480

 2,479

 2,471

 2,202

 2,130

 2,471

 2,484

 2,484

 2,487

 2,489

 2,271

 2,215

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 911

 1,065

 245

 0

 0

 737

 1,225

 1,294

 1,102

 417

 0

 0

SPILL

 5

 0

 43

 26

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 113

 44

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 188

 355

 192

 0

 0

 146

 165

 161

 331

 78

 0

 0

OUTLET

 12

 12

 12

 15

 15

 15

 16

 14

 14

 15

 16

 22

 17

 16

 14

 14

 16

 17

 15

 15

 13

 16

 17

 16

 17

 16

 13

 17

 10

 14

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/01/2019

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,311 79,368 69,412 6,996 1,847 451

ACRE-FEET +1,311 157,426 137,679 13,877 3,664 895

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 137,679

SPILL 13,877 155,220

 64,077

OUTLET 3,664

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,630

 1,392

 2,489

 1,928

 3,140

 2,219

 2,066

 2,221

 2,020

 2,698

 2,602

 2,822

 1,793

 2,665

 2,238

 2,304

 2,015

 2,194

 3,270

 3,667

 3,723

 2,188

 2,367

 3,236

 3,789

 4,123

 3,775

 3,110

 2,273

 2,032

 78,989

 156,675

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
#### § 2806.70 How will the BLM determine the payment for a grant or lease when the linear, communication use, solar energy, or wind energy payment schedules do not apply?

When we determine that the linear, communication use, solar, or wind energy payment schedules do not apply, we may determine your payment through a process based on comparable commercial practices, appraisals, competitive bids, or other reasonable methods. We will notify you in writing of the payment determination. If you disagree with the payment determination, you may appeal our final determination under § 2801.10.

[81 FR 92222, Dec. 19, 2016]
### Geography, geology, and mineral resources of the Ammon and Paradise Valley quadrangles, Idaho

By: George R. Mansfield

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp238

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
§ 2886.12 When must I contact BLM during operations? You must contact BLM: ( a ) At the times specified in your grant or TUP;
( b ) When your use requires a substantial deviation from the grant or TUP. You must seek an amendment to your grant or TUP under § 2887.10 and obtain our approval before you begin any activity that is a substantial deviation;
( c ) When there is a change affecting your application, grant, or TUP including, but not limited to changes in: ( 1 ) Mailing address;
( 2 ) Partners;
( 3 ) Financial conditions; or
( 4 ) Business or corporate status; and
( d ) Whenever site-specific circumstances or conditions arise that result in the need for changes to an approved right-of-way grant or TUP, POD, site plan, mitigation measures, or construction, operation, or termination procedures that are not substantial deviations in location or use authorized by a right-of-way grant or TUP. Changes for authorized actions, project materials, or adopted mitigation measures within the existing, approved right-of-way or TUP area must be submitted to the BLM for review and approval;
( e ) To identify and correct discrepancies or inconsistencies;
( f ) When you submit a certification of construction, if the terms of your grant require it. A certification of construction is a document you submit to the BLM after you have finished constructing a facility, but before you begin operating it, verifying that you have constructed and tested the facility to ensure that it complies with the terms of the grant and with applicable Federal and State laws and regulations; and
( g ) When BLM requests it, such as to update information or confirm that information you submitted before is accurate.
[70 FR 21078, Apr. 22, 2005, as amended at 81 FR 92229, Dec. 19, 2016]
EXHIBIT
10.34




AMENDMENT
TO PROMISSORY NOTE




AMENDMENT, DATED OCTOBER 11, 2010, TO
PROMISSORY NOTE, dated as of February 26, 2010, made by and between Li-ion
Motors Corp., a Nevada corporation, with its principal offices located at 4894
Lone Mountain Road #168 (the “Borrower”) and Frontline Asset Management Inc., a
Nevada corporation, having an office at 4933 West Craig Rd. #126, Las Vegas, NV
89130 (the “Holder”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Original
Note.




WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder
are parties to that certain Promissory Note, dated February 26, 2010 (the
“Original Note”) pursuant to which the Borrower has borrowed the amount of
$2,000,000 from the Holder;




WHEREAS, the Original Note provides
that the Maturity Date shall be March 1, 2011; and




WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holder
have agreed to extend the Maturity Date and to amend Section 4 of the Original
Note in order to provide the Borrower with additional time to secure financing;
and




WHEREAS, in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the Original Note, the Borrower and the Holder hereby approve
the amendment of the Original Note as set forth herein.




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:




1.
            By
      their respective execution of this Agreement, the Borrower and the Holder
      agree that the term “Maturity Date” shall mean March 1,
    2012.




2.            By
their respective execution of this Agreement, the Borrower and the Holder agree
that Section 4 of the Original Note is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:




3.           By
their respective execution of this Agreement, the Borrower and the Holder agree
that Section 4 of the Original Note is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:




Section
4.  Maturity
Date.




The
entire principal balance of this note, together with all accrued and unpaid
interest, shall be due and payable on March 1, 2012 ("maturity date"), unless
otherwise prepaid in accordance with the terms of this note.




4.       
    Except as expressly provided herein, the Original Note
shall continue in full force and effect.







LI-ION
      MOTORS CORP./s/
      Stacey FlingBy:Name:Title:




FRONTLINE
      ASSET MANAGEMENT INC.By:Name:Title:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 926

 934

 915

 891

 899

 887

 828

 830

 586

 628

 624

 745

 771

 655

 600

 384

 424

 550

 626

 654

 680

 704

 745

 774

 806

 839

 837

 935

 994

 1,000

 1,035

 893

 911

 885

 832

 831

 794

 749

 565

 515

 555

 588

 609

 604

 599

 326

 329

 384

 428

 553

 614

 657

 681

 709

 745

 777

 796

 780

 839

 943

 992

 1,002

 918

 923

 906

 861

 875

 830

 785

 634

 550

 600

 599

 680

 703

 627

 401

 365

 402

 489

 588

 629

 665

 686

 730

 759

 787

 814

 802

 890

 971

 994

 1,018

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 27,215

 27,357

 27,505

 27,598

 27,675

 27,749

 27,698

 27,459

 27,117

 26,773

 26,405

 26,118

 25,875

 25,558

 24,994

 24,377

 23,792

 23,312

 22,988

 22,753

 22,521

 22,295

 22,121

 21,975

 21,840

 21,690

 21,514

 21,402

 21,407

 21,463

 21,563

 907

 912

 917

 920

 923

 925

 923

 915

 904

 892

 880

 871

 863

 852

 833

 813

 793

 777

 766

 758

 751

 743

 737

 733

 728

 723

 717

 713

 714

 715

 719

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  annual  Report  of  Unitech  Energy  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin Ericksteen,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: March 15, 2004                                   Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
#### STOCK GROWERS’ BANK, Respondent, v. NEFSY, et al, Appellants.

(218 N. W. 18.)

(File No. 5605.

Opinion filed February 28, 1928.)

*Henry Frawley,*of Deadwood, and *Fiiller & Robinson,*of Pierre, for Appellants.

*Stephens, McNamee, O’Keeffe & Stephens,*of Pierre, for Respondent.

CAMíPBEEE, J.

This is a companion case to Giddings v. Nefsy, 52 S. D. 436, 218 N. W. 18, this day decided, and is likewise before us on rehearing. For the former opinion see 51 S. D. 72, 212 N. W. 512. In this case also the former opinion is adhered to.

SHERWOOD and BROWN, JJ., concur.

BURCH, P. J., and POLLEY, J, dissent.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21487]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Hy-Gene 
Biomedical Corporation of Columbus, Ohio, an exclusive license to U.S. 
Patent No. 5,676,994, ``Non-Separable Starch-Oil Compositions,'' issued 
on October 14, 1997, and to U.S. Patent No. 5,882,713, ``Non-Separable 
Compositions of Starch and Water-Immiscible Organic Materials,'' issued 
on March 16, 1999, for all uses in the field of skin care and skin 
treatment products, including but not limited to drugs, devices, 
cosmetics and products for sanitizing surfaces. U.S. Patent No. 
5,676,994 is a continuation of U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/
233,173, and U.S. Patent No. 5,882,713 is a continuation-in-part of 
U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/233,173. Notice of Availability 
for U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 08/233,173 was published in the 
Federal Register on October 24, 1994.

DATES: Comments must be received within thirty (30) calendar days of 
the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Room 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
(301) 504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal government's patent rights to 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Hy-Gene Biomedical Corporation 
has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The 
prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply 
with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The 
prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) 
days from the date of this published notice, the Agricultural Research 
Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that 
the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Michael D. Ruff,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 04-21487 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P