alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Marwich II, Ltd.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 14, 2006


/s/ Michael Schumacher
-------------------------------------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
§ 2920.2-1 Discussion of proposals. ( a ) *Suggestions by land use proponent.* Any person who seeks to use public lands may contact the Bureau of Land Management office having jurisdiction over the public lands in question and discuss the land use proposal. This contact should be made as early as possible so that administrative requirements and potential conflicts with other land uses can be identified.
( b ) *Response by the authorized officer.* The authorized officer will discuss with the land use proponent whether the requested land use, suitability or non-suitability of the requested land use based on a preliminary examination of existing land use plans, where available, is or is not in conformance with Bureau of Land Management policies and programs for the lands, local zoning ordinances and any other pertinent information. The authorized officer will discuss administrative requirements for the type of land use authorization which may be granted (lease, permit or easement), including, but not limited to: additional information which may be required; qualifications; cost reimbursement requirements; associated clearances, other permits or licenses which may be required; environmental and management considerations; and special requirements such as competitive bidding and identification of on-the-ground investigations which may be required in order to issue a land use authorization.
#### § 2885.18 When must I make estimated rent payments to BLM?

To expedite the processing of your application for a grant or TUP, BLM may estimate rent payments and require you to pay that amount when it issues the grant or TUP. The rent amount may change once BLM determines the actual rent of the grant or TUP. BLM will credit you any rental overpayment, and you are liable for any underpayment. This section does not apply to rent payments made under the rent schedule in this part.
#### Lee Fogel, Appellant, v. Hanwit Building Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and Louis Joseph, Respondent.

Action under section 500 of the Real Property-Law to determine a claim made by defendant Joseph to a right in respect of plaintiff’s property. Judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits unanimously 'affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
§ 2461.5 Segregative effect. Segregative effect of classifications and proposed classifications: ( a ) Publication in the Federal Register of a notice of proposed classification pursuant to § 2461.1(a) or of a notice of classification pursuant to § 2461.2 will segregate the affected land to the extent indicated in the notice.
( b ) The segregative effect of a proposed classification will terminate in one of the following ways: ( 1 ) Classification of the lands within 2 years of publication of the notice of proposed classification in the Federal Register;
( 2 ) Publication in the Federal Register of a notice of termination of the proposed classification;
( 3 ) An Act of Congress;
( 4 ) Expiration of a 2-year period from the date of publication of the notice of proposed classification without continuance as prescribed by the Classification and Multiple Use Act, or expiration of an additional period, not exceeding 2 years, if the required notice of proposed continuance is given.
( c ) The segregative effect of a classification for retention will terminate in one of the following ways: ( 1 ) Reclassification of the lands for some form of disposal;
( 2 ) Publication in the Federal Register of a notice of termination of the classification;
( 3 ) An Act of Congress;
( 4 ) Expiration of the classification.
(Claim denied.)

#### Frank Winters, 811; Bonnie Winters, 812; Frank Joseph Winters, Jr., 813, Claimants, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Respondeat *superior*— when *State not liable. Negligence of its employee.*The State is not liable for the negligence of its employees.

Geo. W. Dowell, for claimants.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court.

These cases will be treated together inasmuch as they refer to the same accident, and the same testimony is applicable to each. Claimants ask for damages sustained by each respectively, arising out of an accident, which occurred under the following circumstances: On March 22, 1924, Frank Winters, together with his wife, Bonnie Winters, and infant child, Frank Joseph Winters, Jr., were driving along a state highway about two miles north of the City of Carbondale, Jackson county, Illinois, in the night time of said date, when he, said Frank Winters, collided with a certain truck owned by the State of Illinois, which had been left standing without an attendant upon, along and crosswise said hard road; that by reason of said collision, the car in which they were driving was injured beyond repair, and each of claimants suffered severe injuries.

Demurrers, filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois are, as a matter of law, sustained.

It appears from the testimony that one Sykes, in the employ of the State of Illinois as highway patrolman from Carbondale to DuQuoin, was driving a State truck north of Carbondale along and upon the pavement upon a State high*156way leading north from Carbondale, and when Sykes had arrived about one mile north of Carbondale he attempted to turn the truck around, and while endeavoring to make the turn backed the truck so that the rear wheels left the pavement and mired down in the mud so that the truck by its own force could not get back upon the pavement. The truck was about at right angles with the pavement so that the front of the truck pointed westward and there was a distance of between four and four and one-half feet between the west edge of the slab and the front part of the truck. After working with the truck and endeavoring to extricate it about an hour, the patrolman went into Carbondale to procure lanterns, and returned with same and placed same on the truck about 7 o ’clock, one on the front bumper and one on the south side of the truck just in front of the rear wheel. We do not find any evidence of negligence on the part of any of the State employes in this instance, and had the driver of the Chevrolet above mentioned, the claimant, Frank Winters, been in the exercise of due care and caution, he could have avoided the accident. It is therefore the judgment of this court that these claims and the same are hereby rejected.
#### § 2543.5 Patent.

Upon submission of satisfactory proof, if no protest or contest is pending, patent will be issued.
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.212 Employment criteria. ( a ) A recipient may not make use of any employment test or other selection criterion that screens out or tends to screen out handicapped persons or any class of handicapped persons unless it can be demonstrated to the Director that ( 1 ) the test score or other selection criterion, as used by the recipient, is shown to be job-related for the position in question, and
( 2 ) alternative job-related tests or criteria that do not screen out or tend to screen out as many handicapped persons are not shown by the Director to be available.
( b ) A recipient shall select and administer tests concerning employment so as best to ensure that, when administered to an applicant or employee who has a handicap that impairs sensory, manual, or speaking skills the test results accurately reflect the applicant's or employee's job skills, aptitude, or whatever other factor the test purports to measure, rather than reflecting the applicant's or employee's impaired sensory, manual, or speaking skills (except where those skills are the factors that the test purports to measure).
( c ) All job qualifications must be shown to be directly related to the job in question.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 652

 654

 656

 641

 616

 490

 385

 437

 478

 535

 587

 595

 588

 632

 673

 726

 755

 769

 778

 783

 782

 753

 483

 429

 418

 406

 383

 412

 414

 629

 652

 641

 618

 498

 388

 369

 391

 439

 473

 534

 585

 583

 585

 634

 662

 665

 745

 770

 758

 725

 478

 429

 408

 405

 384

 378

 382

 409

 642

 652

 650

 629

 561

 424

 377

 419

 464

 505

 567

 590

 586

 602

 656

 701

 741

 762

 776

 775

 768

 559

 460

 415

 412

 399

 380

 403

 411

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 5, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 2812.5-1 Payment required for O. and C. timber.

An applicant will be required to pay to the Bureau of Land Management, in advance of the issuance of the permit, the full stumpage value as determined by the authorized officer of the estimated volume of all timber to be cut, removed, or destroyed, on O. and C. lands in the construction or operation of the road.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 499.85

 499.91

 499.97

 500.34

 500.44

 500.54

 500.14

 500.21

 500.33

 500.58

 501.49

 501.87

 501.66

 501.34

 501.01

 501.15

 501.63

 501.53

 501.24

 501.04

 500.83

 500.88

 500.61

 500.48

 500.17

 499.75

 500.19

 500.29

 500.55

 500.99

 500.70

 55,143

 55,207

 55,271

 55,672

 55,780

 55,888

 55,455

 55,531

 55,661

 55,932

 56,927

 57,347

 57,115

 56,762

 56,398

 56,552

 57,082

 56,972

 56,652

 56,431

 56,203

 56,257

 55,964

 55,823

 55,487

 55,036

 55,509

 55,617

 55,899

 56,376

 56,062

STORAGE

-149

+64

+64

+401

+108

+108

-433

+76

+130

+271

+995

+420

-232

-353

-364

+154

+530

-110

-320

-221

-228

+54

-293

-141

-336

-451

+473

+108

+282

+477

-314

CHANGE

168

293

279

443

294

297

24

287

320

401

764

454

87

27

19

283

475

150

45

90

98

234

58

151

79

31

472

281

620

479

82

INFLOW

 242

 258

 247

 241

 237

 242

 240

 246

 252

 260

 260

 223

 203

 204

 202

 204

 205

 204

 205

 200

 201

 203

 205

 221

 247

 256

 233

 226

 239

 238

 238

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 236

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 3

 0

 0

 3

 1

 2

 3

 2

 4

 2

 19

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 1

 1

 12

 4

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 3

 1

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/01/2015

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +770 7,785 7,082 0 236 79

ACRE-FEET +770 15,442 14,047 0 468 157

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 14,047

SPILL 0 14,515

 55,292

OUTLET 468

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 172

 275

 222

 419

 278

 298

 25

 275

 324

 406

 646

 33

 43

 21

 8

 261

 381

 126

 10

 10

 58

 207

 46

 142

 70

 21

 463

 291

 344

 488

 78

 6,441

 12,776

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
§ 20.509 Penalty mail and official stationery. ( a ) An employee is prohibited from using any official envelope, label, or indorsement authorized by law, to avoid the payment of postage or registry fee on his or her private letter, packet, package, or other matter in the mail (18 U.S.C. 1719).
( b ) Official Government envelopes and official letterhead stationery are Government property that may only be used for authorized purposes. Employees' use of Government envelopes to mail their own personal job applications is not authorized.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.58

 130.79

 130.81

 130.80

 130.72

 130.68

 130.60

 130.67

 130.71

 130.84

 130.81

 130.60

 130.75

 130.81

 130.80

 130.76

 130.70

 130.75

 130.77

 130.73

 130.66

 130.67

 130.87

 130.90

 130.84

 130.67

 130.63

 130.69

 130.81

 130.78

 642

 666

 668

 667

 658

 654

 644

 652

 657

 671

 668

 644

 662

 668

 667

 663

 656

 662

 664

 659

 651

 652

 675

 678

 671

 652

 648

 655

 668

 665

STORAGE

+5

+24

+2

-1

-9

-4

-10

+8

+5

+14

-3

-24

+18

+6

-1

-4

-7

+6

+2

-5

-8

+1

+23

+3

-7

-19

-4

+7

+13

-3

CHANGE

449

452

465

459

440

465

490

505

485

485

460

426

405

376

375

371

390

416

453

485

536

537

552

559

557

581

581

572

599

549

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 402

 396

 420

 416

 401

 423

 450

 457

 439

 434

 418

 394

 352

 329

 331

 328

 349

 368

 407

 443

 495

 491

 494

 512

 516

 546

 539

 524

 548

 506

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

 .28

 .36

 .40

 .33

 .38

 .38

 .44

 .31

 .12

 .34

 .34

 .21

 .23

 .33

 .45

 .49

 .50

 .53

 .59

 .51

 .44

 .50

 .68

 .44

 .42

 .42

 .37

 .39

 .36

 .44

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 RUN DATE: 07/05/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +28 14,475 13,128 1,290 44 11.98 .29

ACRE-FEET +28 28,711 26,039 2,559 87

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,559

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 26,039

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .29

JULY 1, 2016 45.82

 637

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 45.82
December 17, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOSHUA DWAYNE BLEDSOE, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00380-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
§ 11.15 What damages may a trustee recover? ( a ) In an action filed pursuant to section 107(f) or 126(d) of CERCLA, or sections 311(f) (4) and (5) of the CWA, a natural resource trustee who has performed an assessment in accordance with this rule may recover: ( 1 ) Damages as determined in accordance with this part and calculated based on injuries occurring from the onset of the release through the recovery period, less any mitigation of those injuries by response actions taken or anticipated, plus any increase in injuries that are reasonably unavoidable as a result of response actions taken or anticipated;
( 2 ) The costs of emergency restoration efforts under § 11.21 of this part;
( 3 ) The reasonable and necessary costs of the assessment, to include: ( i ) The cost of performing the preassessment and Assessment Plan phases and the methodologies provided in subpart D or E of this part; and
( ii ) Administrative costs and expenses necessary for, and incidental to, the assessment, assessment planning, and restoration, rehabilitation, replacement, and/or acquisition of equivalent resources planning, and any restoration, rehabilitation, replacement, and/or acquisition of equivalent resources undertaken; and
( 4 ) Interest on the amounts recoverable as set forth in section 107(a) of CERCLA. The rate of interest on the outstanding amount of the claim shall be the same rate as is specified for interest on investments of the Hazardous Substance Superfund established under subchapter A of chapter 98 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. Such interest shall accrue from the later of: The date payment of a specified amount is demanded in writing, or the date of the expenditure concerned;
( b ) The determination of the damage amount shall consider any applicable limitations provided for in section 107(c) of CERCLA.
( c ) Where an assessment determines that there is, in fact, no injury, as defined in § 11.62 of this part, the natural resource trustee may not recover assessment costs.
( d ) There shall be no double recovery under this rule for damages or for assessment costs, that is, damages or assessment costs may only be recovered once, for the same discharge or release and natural resource, as set forth in section 107(f)(1) of CERCLA.
( e ) Actions for damages and assessment costs shall comply with the statute of limitations set forth in section 113(g), or, where applicable, section 126(d) of CERCLA.
[51 FR 27725, Aug. 1, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 9095, Mar. 20, 1987; 53 FR 5172, Feb. 22, 1988; 59 FR 14281, Mar. 25, 1994; 61 FR 20609, May 7, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 29, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 58217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21866]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of the Posting of Draft Technical Analyses Data and Other 
Documentation for the O'Hare Modernization Environmental Impact 
Statement, Chicago O'Hare International Airport, Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) gives notice of the 
availability of draft Technical Analyses Data and other documentation 
being used as part of the O'Hare Modernization Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for Chicago O'Hare International Airport, Chicago, 
Illinois. In support of the planning and environmental analyses of the 
O'Hare Modernization EIS, the FAA is using computer simulation 
modeling. The computer modeling includes Delay and Travel Time 
Analysis, Noise Analysis, Air Quality Analysis, and Surface 
Transportation Analysis. As this data becomes available in draft final 
form, the FAA will post the various components of each analysis such as 
the assumptions, project files, and supporting material used in the 
modeling efforts. This information can be found at http://www.agl.faa.gov/OMP/EISTechSim/TechSim.htm.
    This information is being provided to facilitate early involvement 
of the public in the EIS process. The FAA plans to post over five 
million pages of data, and other EIS related documentation prior to the 
release of the Draft EIS. Other EIS related documentation is also 
available on the following Web sites: http://www.agl.faa.gov/omp and 
http://www.ompeis.net.

DATES: Effective Date: July 27, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Cooper, Manager, Chicago Area 
Modernization Program Office, Great Lakes Region, 2300 East Devon 
Avenue, Des Plaines, IL 60018; Telephone: (847) 294-7369, fax: (847) 
294-8157, Internet: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741b1904111d07341215155a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9af5f7eafff3e9dafcfbfbb4fdf5ec">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Des Plaines, Illinois on September 13, 2004.
Barry Cooper,
Manager, Chicago Area Modernization Program Office, Great Lakes Region.
[FR Doc. 04-21866 Filed 9-28-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>