alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2720.0-5 Definitions. As used in this subpart, the term: ( a ) *Prospective record owner* means a person who has a contract or other agreement to purchase a tract of land that is in non-Federal ownership with a reservation of minerals in the United States, or a person who is purchasing a tract of land under the provisions of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 or other laws authorizing the conveyance of Federal lands subject to the reservation of a mineral interest.
( b ) *Known mineral values* means mineral rights in lands containing geologic formations that are valuable in the monetary sense for exploring, developing, or producing natural mineral deposits. The presence of such mineral deposits with potential for mineral development may be known because of previous exploration, or may be inferred based on geologic information.
( c ) *Authorized officer* means any employee of the Bureau of Land Management to whom has been delegated the authority to perform the duties described in this part.
( d ) Proof of ownership means evidence of title acceptable in local realty practice by attorneys and title examiners and may include a current title attorney's opinon, based on a current abstract of title prepared by a bonded title insurance or title abstract company doing business in the locale where the lands are located.
[44 FR 1342, Jan. 4, 1979, as amended at 51 FR 9657, Mar. 20, 1986; 60 FR 12711, Mar. 8, 1995]
§ 2569.504 Once I file, can I change my land selection? ( a ) Once your application is received in accordance with § 2569.411, you will only be allowed to amend your selection until 60 days after you receive the Notice of Survey as set forth in § 2569.501(e). Your amended selection will be considered a new application for purposes of preference, as set forth in § 2569.411(c), but you will not need to resubmit any portions of your application other than the land description and map.
( b ) Otherwise, you will not be allowed to change your selection except as set forth in § 2569.502 or § 2569.503.
( c ) If an applicant relinquishes their application more than 60 days after they receive the Notice of Survey as set forth in § 2569.501(e), the applicant will only be able to submit a new application for a new selection if their original selection is no longer available.
### §339. Tribes excepted from certain provisions

The provisions of this act shall not extend to the territory occupied by the Cherokees, Creeks, Choctaws, Chickasaws, Seminoles, and Osage, Miamies and Peorias, and Sacs and Foxes, in Oklahoma, nor to any of the reservations of the Seneca Nation of New York Indians in the State of New York, nor to that strip of territory in the State of Nebraska adjoining the Sioux Nation on the south added by Executive order.

(Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, §8, 24 Stat. 391.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This act, referred to in text, is act Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, 24 Stat. 388, and is popularly known as the Indian General Allotment Act. For classification of this act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 331 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Sacs and Foxes; Missouri Indians

No allotment of lands was to be made or annuities of money to be paid to any of the Sacs and Foxes of the Missouri Indians who were not enrolled as members of the tribe on Jan. 1, 1890, by a proviso annexed to act Feb. 28, 1891, ch. 383, §5, 26 Stat. 796.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 500.47

 500.77

 499.96

 499.87

 501.04

 502.00

 503.40

 503.68

 503.48

 503.18

 502.85

 504.10

 504.97

 503.38

 503.22

 502.63

 501.64

 502.36

 503.30

 504.00

 504.21

 504.33

 503.30

 502.46

 503.12

 504.63

 505.15

 504.00

 503.66

 503.37

 55,812

 56,138

 55,260

 55,164

 56,431

 57,490

 59,066

 59,385

 59,157

 58,815

 58,442

 59,866

 60,872

 59,043

 58,861

 58,196

 57,093

 57,893

 58,952

 59,750

 59,993

 60,132

 58,952

 58,005

 58,747

 60,479

 61,083

 59,750

 59,362

 59,032

STORAGE

-315

+326

-878

-96

+1,267

+1,059

+1,576

+319

-228

-342

-373

+1,424

+1,006

-1,829

-182

-665

-1,103

+800

+1,059

+798

+243

+139

-1,180

-947

+742

+1,732

+604

-1,333

-388

-330

CHANGE

2,407

2,839

2,263

2,649

3,213

2,935

3,103

2,476

1,985

1,845

1,612

2,380

1,878

382

1,237

914

933

1,900

2,043

1,964

1,693

1,599

873

958

1,714

2,074

1,522

709

1,338

1,461

INFLOW

 1,841

 1,841

 1,839

 1,836

 1,840

 1,847

 1,855

 1,865

 1,862

 1,860

 1,741

 1,640

 1,365

 1,301

 1,320

 1,246

 1,484

 1,488

 1,504

 1,561

 1,567

 1,528

 1,466

 1,430

 1,329

 1,193

 1,207

 1,381

 1,534

 1,624

POWER

 0

 72

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 94

 153

 56

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 722

 756

 862

 860

 732

 551

 447

 446

 140

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 3

 6

 5

 1

 2

 3

 6

 4

 4

 4

 3

 22

 6

 3

 9

 3

 5

 9

 5

 1

 3

 1

 2

 5

 11

 8

 10

 0

 0

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2010 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 05/01/2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,905 54,899 47,395 375 5,516 147

ACRE-FEET +2,905 108,892 94,008 744 10,941 292

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 94,008

SPILL 744 105,693

 56,127

OUTLET 10,941

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,231

 2,564

 1,983

 2,355

 2,788

 2,691

 2,864

 2,242

 1,872

 1,845

 1,563

 2,057

 1,641

 326

 1,158

 872

 889

 1,851

 2,033

 1,775

 1,562

 1,619

 698

 903

 1,657

 2,298

 812

 658

 1,310

 1,397

 50,514

 100,195

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**

 

**906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Terra InventionsCorp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Stacey Fling,  Chief  Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

        (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

        (2)The  information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Stacey Fling                               

Stacey Fling

Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer

 

November 14, 2013
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Verdisys, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending
December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John OKeefe, Co-Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John OKeefe                                  
|John OKeefe                                      
|Co-Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial
Officer
|Principal Accounting Officer                      
|                                                  
|March 29, 2005
#### § 2568.112 What do I do if BLM notifies me that I am eligible to choose an alternative allotment?

You must file a request for an alternative allotment in the Alaska State Office as stated in section 2568.71 and follow all the requirements you did for your original allotment application.
(No. 7

Claim denied)

#### Anna Klitzke, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

*Lease*— when *no recovery can he had on*— limitation *statute.*Where it appears upon the face of claimant’s statement that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations an award will be denied. *(Jackson*v. *State,*4 C. C. Rep. 333, followed.)

Tatge & Tatge, for claimant.

Edward J. Brundage, Attorney General; George C. Dixon, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

It appears from the claimant’s statement that a lease was entered into by the said claimant and the Illinois National Guard for the period of one year from May 1,1915, which was a continuance of a former arrangement.

The rental for this particular period was to be $70.00 per month for a period of one year. It further appears by the statement that the guard occupied said premises during said period until August 31, 1915, and paid rent up until that time upon that date or before rent was paid as agreed, but did not pay rent for the balance of period of eight months.

The claimant makes an additional claim for $70.87 for repairs.

The defendant comes in and urges the Statute of Limitations, and this court in this claim in following its language;

In *Jackson*v. *State of*Illinois, 4 Court of Claims, 333, this court said:

> “It is also the duty of this court to do justice to the people of the State and that wherein a claim is hot brought forth within a reasonable time, it should not be allowed.”

It is the opinion of this court at this time that the claim brought should at least be within the rules prescribed by law. In the first place that the people may know their tax burdens and the second place so that evidence would not become stale or lost, and, therefore, for the reasons assigned, the claim is denied.
### §1300b–4. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–467, §5, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 781, which exempted funds distributed per capita under the provisions of this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 2569.405 What are the special provisions that apply to selections that include State or Native corporation selected land? ( a ) If the selection you are applying for includes State or Native corporation selected land, the BLM must receive a valid relinquishment from the State or Native corporation that covers all of the lands in your selection that are State or Native corporation selected lands. If the application does not include a valid relinquishment, the BLM will contact the State or Native corporation to request a relinquishment. This requirement does not apply if all of the State or Native corporation selected land included within your selection consists of land for which the State or Native corporation has issued a blanket conditional relinquishment as shown on the mapping tool available at *https://www.blm.gov/alaska/2019AKNativeVetsLand .*
( b ) No such relinquishment may cause a Native corporation to become underselected. See 43 U.S.C. 1621(j)(2) for a definition of underselection.
( c ) An application for Native corporation or State selected land will segregate the land from any future entries on the land once the BLM receives a valid relinquishment.
( d ) If the State or Native corporation is unable or unwilling to provide a valid relinquishment, the BLM will issue a decision finding that your selection includes lands that are not available Federal lands and then follow the procedures set out at § 2569.503.
§ 688.400 What are the performance indicators for YouthBuild grants? The performance indicators for YouthBuild grants include: ( a ) The percentage of program participants who are in education and training activities, or in unsubsidized employment, during the second quarter after exit from the program;
( b ) The percentage of program participants who are in education or training activities, or in unsubsidized employment, during the fourth quarter after exit from the program;
( c ) The median earnings of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit from the program;
( d ) The percentage of program participants who obtain a recognized postsecondary credential or secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent (and for those achieving the secondary diploma or its recognized equivalent, such participants also have obtained or retained employment or are in an education or training program leading to a recognized postsecondary credential within 1 year after exit from the program);
( e ) The percentage of program participants who, during a program year, are in an education and training program that leads to a recognized postsecondary credential or employment and who are achieving measurable skill gains toward such a credential or employment;
( f ) The percentage of participants in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit from the program who were employed by the same employer in the second and fourth quarters after exit; and
( g ) Other indicators of performance as may be required by the Secretary.
[81 FR 56460, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 13614, Feb. 23, 2024]
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 19
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 19
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 19
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 19
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 19
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 19
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 19
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 19
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 19
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 19
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 3,114

 2,189

 3,069

 2,350

 3,715

 2,858

 2,851

 3,110

 3,043

 3,530

 3,120

 3,412

 3,573

 2,731

 3,729

 3,091

 3,531

 3,614

 3,091

 2,967

 2,653

 3,402

 3,586

 3,306

 3,523

 3,595

 2,642

 2,406

 4,548

 5,880

 4,260

 95,000

 93,208

 90,627

 89,012

 86,794

 85,983

 84,399

 82,888

 81,698

 80,504

 79,832

 78,804

 78,106

 77,595

 76,309

 76,036

 75,171

 74,767

 74,462

 73,675

 72,810

 71,690

 71,337

 71,177

 70,759

 70,568

 70,455

 69,442

 68,256

 69,163

 71,291

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: December 5, 2001

 98,114

 95,397

 93,696

 91,362

 90,509

 88,841

 87,250

 85,998

 84,741

 84,034

 82,952

 82,216

 81,679

 80,326

 80,038

 79,127

 78,702

 78,381

 77,553

 76,642

 75,463

 75,092

 74,923

 74,483

 74,282

 74,163

 73,097

 71,848

 72,804

 75,043

 75,551

 4,531,000

 4,509,000

 4,488,000

 4,467,000

 4,445,000

 4,424,000

 4,403,000

 4,382,000

 4,360,000

 4,339,000

 4,318,000

 4,296,000

 4,275,000

 4,254,000

 4,232,000

 4,211,000

 4,190,000

 4,168,000

 4,147,000

 4,126,000

 4,104,000

 4,083,000

 4,062,000

 4,041,000

 4,019,000

 3,998,000

 3,977,000

 3,955,000

 3,934,000

 3,913,000

 3,891,000

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 100,000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 978

 995

 984

 985

 1,009

 1,006

 1,007

 960

 974

 909

 892

 908

 886

 956

 960

 964

 970

 900

 909

 931

 906

 910

 907

 909

 911

 924

 912

 939

 942

 982

 977

 958

 965

 963

 952

 968

 962

 952

 921

 915

 871

 822

 858

 845

 885

 780

 925

 874

 805

 860

 886

 828

 870

 835

 847

 833

 830

 860

 902

 818

 909

 836

 969

 981

 973

 969

 988

 988

 978

 939

 944

 894

 857

 886

 863

 919

 929

 946

 918

 847

 887

 907

 868

 891

 873

 871

 873

 899

 884

 921

 914

 938

 906

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 10, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 26,764

 26,820

 26,911

 26,978

 27,070

 27,136

 27,190

 27,242

 27,318

 27,396

 27,421

 27,457

 27,448

 27,492

 27,547

 27,617

 27,647

 27,577

 27,552

 27,583

 27,568

 27,574

 27,587

 27,619

 27,623

 27,624

 27,581

 27,570

 27,539

 27,514

 27,451

 892

 894

 897

 899

 902

 905

 906

 908

 911

 913

 914

 915

 915

 916

 918

 921

 922

 919

 918

 919

 919

 919

 920

 921

 921

 921

 919

 919

 918

 917

 915

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0060 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 1 94 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 2012 - 0168/B **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issu e**  (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the c omments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
#### § 2568.10 What Alaska Native allotment benefits are available to certain Alaska Native veterans?

Eligible Alaska Native veterans may receive an allotment of one or two parcels of Federal land in Alaska totaling no more than 160 acres.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 995

 1,017

 1,021

 951

 995

 1,017

 1,018

 966

 997

 997

 947

 880

 897

 904

 924

 933

 928

 922

 931

 970

 992

 1,038

 1,087

 1,178

 1,203

 1,203

 1,163

 1,153

 1,075

 1,032

 1,018

 957

 987

 884

 887

 923

 974

 950

 925

 951

 951

 869

 861

 876

 890

 900

 905

 911

 907

 917

 926

 965

 979

 1,007

 1,064

 1,171

 1,157

 1,119

 1,068

 1,009

 1,014

 983

 984

 1,005

 969

 919

 967

 999

 987

 948

 979

 977

 911

 872

 885

 895

 917

 929

 921

 914

 926

 955

 979

 1,015

 1,056

 1,127

 1,188

 1,183

 1,142

 1,107

 1,040

 1,021

 1,002

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 638

 633

 646

 663

 672

 674

 687

 669

 627

 639

 619

 614

 606

 631

 625

 638

 616

 642

 618

 592

 601

 565

 589

 618

 640

 657

 648

 669

 658

 671

 670

 592

 588

 613

 599

 597

 637

 625

 614

 592

 594

 590

 573

 542

 530

 536

 535

 557

 577

 560

 536

 515

 440

 450

 531

 571

 603

 598

 585

 590

 597

 653

 610

 609

 632

 643

 640

 655

 652

 649

 613

 616

 606

 599

 583

 583

 583

 594

 591

 617

 592

 574

 541

 515

 510

 591

 609

 632

 623

 617

 634

 650

 662

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 1, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### Sidney Smith, Appellant, v. Reich Bros. L. I. Motor Freight, Inc., Respondent.

Present — Holán, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1071.]
#### § 3104.20 Lease bond.

The operator, a lessee, or an owner of operating rights (sublessee) must be covered by a bond in its own name as principal or obligor in an amount of not less than the amount specified in 43 CFR 3104.1 for each lease conditioned upon compliance with all of the terms of the lease. Where two or more lease interest holders have interests in different formations or portions of the lease, separate bonds may be posted. The operator shall be covered by a bond in his/her own name as principal, or a bond in the name of the lessee or sublessee, provided that a consent of the surety, or the obligor in the case of a personal bond, to include the operator under the coverage of the bond is furnished to the BLM office maintaining the bond.