alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
****
 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Registrant on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 and as amended on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officers certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 
(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
       financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.      
GULLEDGE REALTY INVESTORS II, L.P.   
     By:     GULL-AGE Properties, Inc. 
                Managing General Partner        
Date:     August 16, 2002   
     By:     /s/ Douglas L. Kelly         _______ 
                Douglas L. Kelly 
                President, Secretary, Treasurer, 
                and Director     
     By:     /s/ Joseph G. Porter         _______ 
                Joseph G. Porter 
                Vice President and  
                Assistant Treasurer  
 ****
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 256

 254

 264

 272

 265

 273

 283

 295

 283

 286

 267

 263

 267

 264

 254

 245

 244

 245

 245

 248

 273

 277

 288

 293

 294

 294

 310

 323

 313

 311

 332

 237

 235

 241

 250

 249

 255

 252

 264

 245

 242

 238

 242

 234

 228

 228

 217

 219

 221

 221

 223

 236

 241

 234

 249

 236

 246

 253

 252

 255

 265

 272

 244

 243

 255

 262

 259

 261

 275

 285

 266

 263

 252

 254

 257

 253

 243

 238

 235

 240

 238

 236

 248

 265

 277

 276

 268

 278

 289

 284

 280

 284

 288

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
Exhibit 99.2

                                                 Banco Galicia [Graphic omitted]

BUENOS AIRES, Argentina, July 13, 2005, Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A.
(Buenos Aires Stock Exchange: GALI) (the "Bank") announced today that, as part
of the exchange of liabilities for Boden 2012 bonds and cash carried out by
Banco Galicia Uruguay S.A. ("Galicia Uruguay"), that closed on May 27, 2005, the
Argentine Central Bank has authorized the Bank to transfer to Galicia Uruguay, a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, US$ 196 million of face value of Boden
2012. These bonds were used by Galicia Uruguay to settle the exchange offer,
pursuant to the expressions of interest received from its creditors. Galicia
Uruguay has accepted expressions of interest from its creditors for US$ 243
million.

In addition, Grupo Financiero Galicia S.A. (Buenos Aires Stock Exchange/Nasdaq:
GGAL) ("Grupo Galicia"), the Bank's controlling company, announced today that it
has forgiven US$ 43 million of subordinated negotiable obligations issued by
Galicia Uruguay.

Galicia Uruguay's exchange offer together with the debt forgiveness by Grupo
Galicia, are of direct benefit to the Bank, not only because of the significant
reduction in its consolidated liabilities, but also because of the US$ 43
million increase in its shareholders' equity resulting from Grupo Galicia's debt
forgiveness. In addition, the Bank's regulatory capital will increase by US$
64.5 million, given that the increase in shareholders' equity allows for a
greater amount of subordinated debt (issued as part of the restructuring of the
Bank's foreign debt) to be computed as supplementary capital.

Founded in 1905, Banco Galicia is one of the largest private-sector banks in the
Argentine financial system and a leading financial services provider in the
country. As a universal bank, through affiliated companies and a variety of
distribution channels, Banco Galicia offers a full spectrum of financial
services to over 2.6 million customers, both individual and corporate.
§ 30.229 When will testimony be required for approval of a will, codicil, or revocation? ( a ) The judge will require testimony if someone contests the approval of a self-proved will, codicil, or revocation, or submits a non-self-proved will for approval. In any of these cases, the attesting witnesses who are in the reasonable vicinity of the place of hearing must appear and be examined, unless they are unable to appear and testify because of physical or mental infirmity.
( b ) If an attesting witness is not in the reasonable vicinity of the place of hearing or is unable to appear and testify because of physical or mental infirmity, the judge may: ( 1 ) Order the deposition of the attesting witness at a location reasonably near the residence of the witness;
( 2 ) Admit the testimony of other witnesses to prove the testamentary capacity of the testator and the execution of the will; and
( 3 ) As evidence of the execution, admit proof of the handwriting of the testator and of the attesting witnesses, or of any of them.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4631 

To amend the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000 to eliminate the 

authority of the Secretary of Agriculture to make value-added agricultural product market development grants to support the development, 

production, or marketing of alcoholic beverages and to rescind a portion 

of the Commodity Credit Corporation funds made available for such 

grants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2016 

Mr. RUSSELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000 

to eliminate the authority of the Secretary of Agriculture 

to make value-added agricultural product market development grants to support the development, production, 

or marketing of alcoholic beverages and to rescind a 

portion of the Commodity Credit Corporation funds made 

available for such grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4631 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Taxpayer-Funded 

3 Alcohol Marketing Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. VALUE-ADDED AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT MARKET 

5 DEVELOPMENT GRANTS. 

6 (a) EXCLUSION OF ALCOHOL PRODUCTS FROM DEF7 INITION.—Section 231(a)(5) of the Agricultural Risk Pro8 tection Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 1632a(a)(5)) is amended 

9 by adding below subparagraph (B) the following: 

10 ‘‘The term ‘value-added agricultural product’ does 

11 not include beer, wine, distilled spirits, hard cider, or 

12 other alcohol product.’’. 

13 (b) RESCISSION.—Of the funds made available under 

14 section 231(b)(7)(A) of the Agricultural Risk Protection 

15 Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 1632a(b)(7)(A)) to the Secretary 

16 of Agriculture to make value-added agricultural product 

17 market development grants and unobligated as of the date 

18 of the enactment of this Act, $8,000,000 is hereby re19 scinded. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §375. Determination of heirship of deceased members of Five Civilized Tribes

A determination of the question of fact as to who are the heirs of any deceased citizen allottee of the Five Civilized Tribes of Indians who may die or may have heretofore died, leaving restricted heirs, by the probate court of the State of Oklahoma having jurisdiction to settle the estate of said deceased, conducted in the manner provided by the laws of said State for the determination of heirship in closing up the estates of deceased persons, shall be conclusive of said question: Provided, That an appeal may be taken in the manner and to the court provided by law, in cases of appeal in probate matters generally: Provided further, That where the time limited by the laws of said State for the institution of administration proceedings has elapsed without their institution, as well as in cases where there exists no lawful ground for the institution of administration proceedings in said courts, a petition may be filed therein having for its object a determination of such heirship and the case shall proceed in all respects as if administration proceedings upon other proper grounds had been regularly begun, but this proviso shall not be construed to reopen the question of the determination of an heirship already ascertained by competent legal authority under existing laws: Provided further, That said petition shall be verified, and in all cases arising hereunder service by publication may be had on all unknown heirs, the service to be in accordance with the method of serving nonresident defendants in civil suits in the district courts of said State; and if any person so served by publication does not appear and move to be heard within six months from the date of the final order, he shall be concluded equally with parties personally served or voluntarily appearing.

(June 14, 1918, ch. 101, §1, 40 Stat. 606.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Administration Expenses; Compensation; Restriction on Use of Funds; Appeal

Act June 30, 1919, ch. 4, §18, 41 Stat. 21, appropriated $205,000 for expenses of administration of the affairs of the Five Civilized Tribes, Oklahoma, and the compensation of employees, prohibited any part of the appropriation from being used in forwarding the undisputed claims to be paid from individual moneys of restricted allottees, or their heirs, or in forwarding uncontested agricultural and mineral leases (excluding oil and gas leases) made by individual restricted Indian allottees, or their heirs, to the Secretary of the Interior for approval, provided that all such undisputed claims or uncontested leases (except oil and gas leases) required to be approved under existing law by the Secretary of the Interior shall be paid, approved, rejected or disapproved by the Superintendent for the Five Civilized Tribes of Oklahoma and authorized an appeal within thirty days by party aggrieved by any decision or order of the Superintendent for the Five Civilized Tribes of Oklahoma to the Secretary of the Interior.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00305-CR

Cameron Bernard Bennett

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1282362D)

September 12, 2013

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
#### § 901.39 Reply to answer.

No reply to the respondent's answer shall be required, but the Executive Director may file a reply at his/her discretion or at the request of the Administrative Law Judge.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arnulfo QUINTERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40673.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

*637James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Pursuant to a written agreement, Arnulfo Quintero pleaded guilty to possession of more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute and unlawful use of a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime. Quintero argues for the first time on appeal that the district court abused its discretion when it imposed a condition of supervised release that requires him to cooperate in the collection of his DNA. This claim is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1100-01 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction to review this claim, and this portion of the appeal is dismissed.

Quintero argues for the first time on appeal that his conviction for possession of more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute should be reversed because 21 U.S.C. § 841 is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This issue is foreclosed, as Quintero concedes, by *United States v. Slaughter,*238 F.3d 580, 582 (5th Cir.2000). Quintero’s conviction is affirmed.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 352

 354

 354

 349

 354

 329

 334

 322

 331

 334

 353

 352

 370

 367

 345

 327

 315

 310

 315

 296

 286

 284

 282

 287

 286

 278

 290

 291

 280

 278

 336

 334

 328

 319

 309

 304

 286

 298

 300

 297

 298

 309

 311

 288

 298

 285

 282

 259

 244

 271

 269

 270

 273

 272

 270

 267

 268

 267

 263

 256

 343

 342

 337

 330

 322

 311

 307

 306

 307

 306

 314

 324

 325

 318

 309

 298

 291

 288

 286

 278

 275

 275

 276

 277

 277

 271

 278

 278

 271

 265

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 12, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
#### William W. Farley, as State Commissioner of Excise, v. Liquors Seized at No. 195 Hester Street. Francesco Bernardoni, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present'—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 147

 155

 149

 160

 170

 178

 172

 169

 169

 173

 167

 168

 170

 172

 180

 165

 162

 166

 169

 182

 193

 177

 177

 177

 184

 170

 166

 148

 172

 176

 184

 132

 137

 136

 136

 139

 140

 135

 135

 140

 146

 151

 157

 157

 159

 146

 144

 143

 145

 151

 157

 160

 161

 160

 157

 154

 153

 137

 126

 145

 167

 161

 140

 144

 143

 146

 152

 156

 154

 152

 153

 156

 159

 163

 163

 166

 160

 154

 153

 156

 161

 165

 168

 169

 170

 167

 164

 160

 157

 140

 161

 172

 168

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe quarterly report of Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JamesJ. O’Reardon, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        |     | August 9, 2007                                |
|--------|----------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |     |                                          |
|   |     | /s/ James J. O’Reardon, Jr.              |   |
|   |     | James J. O’Reardon, Jr.,                 |
|   | * * | *Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toRuss Berrie and Company, Inc. and will be retained by Russ Berrie andCompany, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

----
P.,.ve'M.4n i Enf).r,eer,n g r^ier,hor,f - 90 1 2.' ^ "^- i i 31") ! De'nor.ra THod. I Fa . 90'.>:' J 362 0 Memi)h,r . r/j ^hii R lf.1 6

"••T'.^ M Expres s Februar y10 , 201 0 Docke t Managemen t Facility U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 NewJerse yAvenue , SE . Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D

C 20590-00 1 Subject : Docke t No . FAA-2009-0883 ; Directorat e Identifie r97-ANE-0 8 FedE xExpres s Powerplan t Engineerin g ha s reviewe d th e FAA' s Notic e o fPropose d Rul e Makin g addressin g th e revisio n o fAirworthines s Directiv e 97-17-0 4 whic h concern s th e cleanin g an d non-destructiv e inspectio n o flo wpressur e compresso rfron t hubs , P/ N 5000501-01 . I n response , w e offe rth e followin g comments . FedE xExpres s Powerplan t Engineerin g ha s n o objection s t o th e technica l conten t o fth e propose d revisio n t o A D 97-17-04 . FedE xExpres s ha s bee n an d continue s t o b e i n ful l complianc e wit h th e requirement s o fthi s Airworthines s Directive . Operationa l impac t o fth e propose d A D revisio n t o FedE xExpres s woul d b e negligibl e presumin g th e presen t re-inspectio n threshold s remai n i n effec t an d n o additiona l Par t Numbe rand/o rSeria l Numbe rLP C fron t hub s ar e Introduce d vi a th e revision . Eliminatio n o fth e monthl yreportin g requiremen t woul d prov e economicall yfavorabl e t o FedE xExpres s as i t reduce s th e manhour s incurre d i n complyin g wit h thi s AD . FedE xExpres s anticipate s n o regulatoryimpac t stemmin g fro m th e propose d A D revision , no rd o w e forese e an yEnvironmenta l o rEnerg yimpac t du e t o th e propose d chang e i n reportin g requirement s fo rA D 97-17-04 . Respectfully , FedE xExpres s 

# A<4^/? ^ Willia m R . Hart Project Enginee r- 3T8 D Powerplan t Engineerin g
### §4026. Return of withdrawn funds

Subject to such conditions as the Secretary may prescribe, any Indian tribe which has withdrawn trust funds may choose to return any or all of the trust funds such tribe has withdrawn by notifying the Secretary in writing of its intention to return the funds to the control and management of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 103–412, title II, §206, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4243.)
69–008 

115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 115–299 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE 

HOUSE AMENDMENT TO THE SENATE AMENDMENT TO THE BILL (H.R. 

601) TO ENHANCE THE TRANSPARENCY AND ACCELERATE THE IMPACT 

OF ASSISTANCE PROVIDED UNDER THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 

1961 TO PROMOTE QUALITY BASIC EDUCATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, TO BETTER ENABLE SUCH COUNTRIES TO ACHIEVE UNIVERSAL 

ACCESS TO QUALITY BASIC EDUCATION AND IMPROVED LEARNING 

OUTCOMES, TO ELIMINATE DUPLICATION AND WASTE, AND FOR OTHER 

PURPOSES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2017.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 509] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 509, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of the Senate 

amendment to H.R. 601. The resolution makes in order a motion 

offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment to H.R. 601. 

The resolution waives all points of order against consideration of 

the motion. The resolution provides that the Senate amendment 

and the motion shall be considered as read. The resolution provides 

one hour of debate on the motion equally divided and controlled by 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the motion includes waivers of the following: 

• Section 306 of the Congressional Budget Act, which prohibits consideration of legislation within the jurisdiction of the 

Committee on the Budget unless referred to or reported by the 

Budget Committee; and 

2 

• Section 314(f) of the Congressional Budget Act, which prohibits the consideration of legislation that provides budget authority for a fiscal year that exceeds either of the discretionary 

statutory spending limits. 

Æ
#### Anna S. Gwydir, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. Albert Cowdell, Jr., Respondent.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
§ 2650.3-2 Mining claims. ( a ) *Possessory rights.* Pursuant to section 22(c) of the Act, on any lands to be conveyed to village or regional corporations, any person who prior to August 31, 1971, initiated a valid mining claim or location, including millsites, under the general mining laws and recorded notice thereof with the appropriate State or local office, shall not be challenged by the United States as to his possessory rights, if all requirements of the general mining laws are met. However, the validity of any unpatented mining claim may be contested by the United States, the grantee of the United States or its successor in interest, or by any person who may initiate a private contest. Contest proceedings and appeals therefrom shall be to the Interior Board of Land Appeals.
( b ) *Patent requirements met.* An acceptable mineral patent application must be filed with the appropriate Bureau of Land Management office not later than December 18, 1976, on lands conveyed to village or regional corporations. ( 1 ) Upon a showing that a mineral survey cannot be completed by December 18, 1976, the filing of an application for a mineral survey, which states on its face that it was filed for the purpose of proceeding to patent, will constitute an acceptable mineral patent application, provided all applicable requirements under the general mining laws have been met.
( 2 ) The failure of an applicant to prosecute diligently his application for mineral patent to completion will result in the loss of benefits afforded by section 22(c) of the Act.
( 3 ) The appropriate office of the Bureau of Land Management shall give notice of the filing of an application under this section to the village or regional corporation which has selection rights in the land covered by the application.
( c ) *Patent requirements not met.* Any mineral patent application filed after December 18, 1976, on land conveyed to any village or regional corporation pursuant to this Act, will be rejected for lack of departmental jurisdiction. After that date, patent applications may continue to be filed on land not conveyed to village or regional corporations until such land is conveyed.
(43 U.S.C. 1601-1624)
[38 FR 14218, May 30, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 33174, Aug. 6, 1975]