alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* NEW

ACRE-FEET INFLOW MELONES RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S.

65,757

1 509.06 65,795 38 2,359 2,384 2,239 0 87 14

2 509.01 65,732 -63 1,626 1,639 1,656 0 0 2

3 509.23 66,007 275 1,803 1,813 1,658 0 0 6

4 509.52 66,369 362 1,883 1,881 1,696 0 0 4

5 509.17 65,932 -437 1,445 1,471 1,657 0 0 8

6 509.29 66,082 150 1,713 1,723 1,626 0 0 11

7 508.69 65,338 -744 1,250 1,265 1,615 0 0 10

8 508.57 65,191 -147 1,548 1,563 1,610 0 0 12

9 507.46 63,835 -1,356 948 951 1,621 0 0 11

10 507.76 64,198 363 1,740 1,696 1,550 0 0 7

11 508.91 65,609 1,411 2,169 2,168 1,446 0 0 12

12 509.08 65,820 211 1,443 1,433 1,325 0 0 12

13 509.38 66,194 374 1,419 1,420 1,219 0 0 11

14 509.17 65,932 -262 1,170 1,187 1,291 0 0 11

15 508.66 65,301 -631 883 910 1,190 0 0 11

16 508.21 64,748 -553 984 994 1,253 0 0 10

17 508.43 65,018 270 1,337 1,351 1,191 0 0 10

18 509.28 66,069 1,051 1,733 1,704 1,193 0 0 10

19 509.26 66,044 -25 1,264 1,300 1,269 0 0 8

20 507.84 64,295 -1,749 439 452 1,314 0 0 7

21 507.70 64,125 -170 1,338 1,373 1,415 0 0 9

22 507.56 63,956 -169 1,344 1,355 1,422 0 0 7

23 507.69 64,113 157 1,443 1,456 1,356 0 0 8

24 507.65 64,065 -48 1,290 1,293 1,304 0 0 10

25 508.03 64,526 461 1,507 1,521 1,265 0 0 10

26 508.22 64,760 234 1,486 1,504 1,360 0 0 8

27 508.12 64,637 -123 1,256 1,241 1,311 0 0 7

28 507.36 63,713 -924 833 852 1,291 0 0 8

29 506.89 63,146 -567 974 1,000 1,250 0 0 10

30 506.97 63,241 95 1,225 1,237 1,172 0 0 5

TOTALS -2,516 41,852 42,137 42,765 0 87 269

ACRE-FEET -2,516 83,013 83,579 84,824 0 173 534

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

** EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 84,824 Outlet 173

Spill 0 Total 84,997

Historical Archive and Report Database

Tulloch Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 10/10/2023
### §3013. Enforcement

The United States district courts shall have jurisdiction over any action brought by any person alleging a violation of this chapter and shall have the authority to issue such orders as may be necessary to enforce the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 101–601, §15, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3058.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–601, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3048, known as the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3001 of this title and Tables.
|EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In
connection with the Quarterly Report of MEDTOX Scientific, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Richard J. Braun, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                     |                           
|-------------------- | --------------------------
|Dated:   May 2, 2005 | By:   /s/ Richard J. Braun
|                     | Richard J. Braun          
|                     | Chief Executive Officer   

|27
|--
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-20421

_____________________

In The Matter of: DEAN RAY EVANS; JANE ELAINE EVANS

Debtors

BAYSHORE NATIONAL BANK OF LA PORTE,

Appellant,

v.

DEAN RAY EVANS; JANE ELAINE EVANS,

Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

_________________________________________________________________

February 7, 1996

Before KING, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bayshore National Bank of La Porte appeals the district

court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's discharge of Dean

Ray Evans and Jane Elaine Evans in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. By
2

focusing on the Evanses' transfer of nonexempt assets into their

exempt homestead, Bayshore sought to bar the Evanses' general

discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2) and to impose an

equitable lien on their homestead pursuant to the Texas

Fraudulent Transfers Act. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code §§ 24.005 and

24.008. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment in favor

of the Evanses on all causes of action regarding the homestead. 

Because we find that Bayshore did not submit sufficient summary

judgment evidence as to the Evanses' intent to conceal the

transfers, or to hinder, delay, or defraud, and because the

transfers did not occur within one year of the Evanses'

bankruptcy filing, we conclude that the district court did not

err in affirming the bankruptcy court's summary judgment.

By focusing on the transfer by Dean Ray Evans of two

cashier's checks to Texas Coastal Bank ("TCB"), Bayshore sought

to bar the Evanses' general discharge pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §

727(a)(2) or, alternatively, to have the debt to Bayshore

declared nondischargeable pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). 

After trial on the merits, the bankruptcy court found that D.

Evans' transfer of the cashier's checks was a preferential

payment and not a transfer made to hinder, delay, or defraud

creditors. The record supports that finding. Additionally, the

bankruptcy court determined that Bayshore had no cause of action

under § 523(a)(6) because Bayshore had no legal claim to the

cashier's checks at the time that D. Evans transferred them to

TCB. We agree with the lower courts that, on the facts
3

presented, the transfer of the two cashier's checks to TCB did

not justify denial of discharge under § 523(a)(6).

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the

district court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 430

 434

 428

 406

 431

 438

 459

 458

 484

 519

 542

 564

 669

 725

 751

 719

 710

 634

 653

 710

 731

 848

 943

 953

 951

 978

 1,004

 1,004

 981

 916

 898

 409

 427

 401

 374

 373

 421

 425

 440

 452

 490

 502

 516

 571

 645

 691

 686

 598

 585

 609

 639

 705

 732

 863

 920

 926

 947

 983

 968

 916

 882

 856

 418

 431

 415

 391

 394

 429

 445

 448

 470

 508

 521

 551

 634

 689

 726

 706

 654

 611

 635

 674

 716

 774

 915

 937

 939

 960

 990

 989

 942

 899

 878

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 16,271

 16,055

 15,831

 15,603

 15,441

 15,429

 15,485

 15,509

 15,507

 15,505

 15,458

 15,432

 15,498

 15,579

 15,646

 15,640

 15,558

 15,416

 15,293

 15,213

 15,233

 15,515

 15,979

 16,503

 17,027

 17,586

 18,196

 18,782

 19,315

 19,811

 20,271

 542

 535

 528

 520

 515

 514

 516

 517

 517

 517

 515

 514

 517

 519

 522

 521

 519

 514

 510

 507

 508

 517

 533

 550

 568

 586

 607

 626

 644

 660

 676

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
SEPTEMBER 23, 2015

**Ms.	Brittan**

**y	Newton** U.S. Department	of	T ransportation Fe deral	A viation	Administration 800	Independence	A

ve .	S.W . Wa shington,	D.C.	20591

RE: **Docket	#	F**

**AA -**  **2015 -**  **2495**

Dear Ms.	Newton , Thank	you	for	your	response	to	my	request	for	exemption	from	P art	21,	Subpart	H	of	Title	14	CFR. I	be lieve	aerial	photography	is	in	the	public	interest	as	it	relates	to	the	following	fields: 1) Real	Estate. Sellers	will	certainly	be	interested	in	providing	a	new ,	interesting	w ay	to	view	properties	for	sale; and	I	believe	buyers	will	appreciate	having	more	i nformation	at	their	disposal,	including	birds’ - eye	views	that clearly	show	conditions	of	roofs,	land,	easements,	and	the	like. 2) Insurance – Homeowners. Current	homeowners	will	benefit	from	having	additional	photographic	records	to submit	to	their	insurance carriers,	showing	the	condition	of	property	before	an y	damage. 3) Insurance – Carriers. Insurance	carriers	and	their	adjustors	will	very	likely	appreciate	having	a	w ay to	inspect roofs,	land,	property	damage	and	the	like	from	a	birds’ - eye	view ,	to	assist	in providing	accurate	claims. 4) Contractors. Contractors	can	use	this	service	to	periodically	monitor	progress	of	commercial	or	residential construction	sites.		Homebuyers	will	likely	appreciate	this	extra	measure	of	scrutin y. I	am	committed	to	flying	in	a	safe	manner ,	with	all	due	respect	to	persons	and	property . I’m	a	life - long	resident	of New	Orleans,	and	w ant	to	bring	this	ex citing	technology	to	its	residents.			Please	let	me	know	if	there	is	an ything	else	I can	or	should provide	to	the	F AA	regarding	this	petition. Wa rm	regards,

**Daniel	Mackin** Starline	Aerial	Photography ,	LLC Starline	Aerial	Photography ,	LLC 330	Jewel	Street Apartment	C New	Orleans,	LA	70124 Te l 504.881.5674 daniel@starline4k.com
Opinion issued October 6 , 2016

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 16 - 00493 - CV

——————————— JULIUS TABE, M.D. , Appella nt

V. TEXAS INPATIENT CONS ULTANTS, LLLP , Appell e e On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2014 - 73381

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , Julius Tabe, filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal an interlocutory order denying his motion for reconsideration of an order granting partial summary judgment. Appellant’s notice of appeal stated that the denial of his2

motion for reconsideration effectively denied his plea to the jurisdiction and motion to compel discovery. Appellee , Texas Inpatient Consultants, subsequently filed a motion requesting that we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and grant sanctions pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 45 for the filing of a frivolous appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 45. Appellee asserts that we lack jurisdiction because (1) denial of a motion for rec onsideration of partial summary judgment is not an appealable interlocutory order, (2) there is no order denying appellant’s plea to the jurisdiction and, even if there was, the denial of a plea to the jurisdiction by a non

- governmental party is not an app ealable interlocutory order, and (3) there is no order denying appellant’s motion to compel discovery and, even if there was, it would not be an appealable interlocutory order. See T EX . C IV . P RAC . & R EM . C ODE 51.014(a). Twelve days after the filing of appe llee’s motion, a ppellant filed a motion for voluntary dismissal of his appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.1(a)(1)

. In response, Texas Inpatients reiterates its request for sanctions. We grant appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX . R. A PP . P

. 42.1(a )(1). We deny the motion for sanctions

. Any other pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Bland, Massengale, and Lloyd.
### §653. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act May 18, 1928, ch. 624, §3, 45 Stat. 602, which related to settlement of claims notwithstanding statutes of limitation, amount of decree, and set-off of payments, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 10.19


 





 


Private & confidential to


 


Tove Nilsen Ljungquist (the
‘Participant’)


 


Stock Options


 


1.000.000 stock options are granted to the Participant on the
terms set out in this allocation letter, in the Stock Option policy and in any resolutions decided upon by either the Board of
Directors or Annual General Assembly.


 


The Options will be subscribed by FREYR AS (the ‘Company’)
and transferred to the Participant immediately after vesting. The Options are granted without consideration from the Participant.


 


The Participant shall pay the Exercise price for each Option
that is exercised. The Exercise Price is determined by the Board of Directors of the Company according to the Stock Option Plan,
however, Management will put the stock options award forward to the Board for approval with an Exercise Price equivalent to the
volume weighted average share price the five days leading up to the date of signing the employment contract.


 


Grant schedule





 


	 	Grant date	Options granted	Exercise price	 
	 	
        On signing employment

        contract
	375 000	NOK 1,73	 
	 	Financial Close Fast track	375 000	NOK 1,73	options earmarked for the Optionee at the relevant Exercise price, granted after 12 months in the job.
	 	Financial Close Phase 1 16GWh	250 000	NOK 1,73	 
	 	TOTAL	1 000 000	 	 
	Vesting date	01.10.2023	 
	Exercise period	01.10.23 - 30.09.25	 


 


Options that have not been exercised by 17:00 hours (CET) on
30.09.25 will lapse without any consideration and may not be exercised by the Participant.


  





	Date: 30th September 2020	 	
        Date: 30th September 2020

         

	Place: Oslo	 	I have read the 2019 Stock Option Plan, and accept the terms of such Plan
	 	 	 
	
        /s/ Tom Jensen
	 	
        /s/ Tove Nilsen Ljungquist

	FREYR AS	 	Participant
	Tom Jensen, CEO	 	Tove Nilsen Ljungquist
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 75441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-29530]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air 
Carrier Permits

    Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) during the Week Ending Novermber 30, 2013. The 
following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B 
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-1996-1530.
    Date Filed: November 26, 2013.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: December 17, 2013.
    Description: Application of Federal Express Corporation (``FedEx 
Express'') requesting renewal of its certificate of public convenience 
and necessity for Route 638, authorizing FedEx Express to provide 
scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between a 
point or points in the United States, via any intermediate points, to a 
point or points in China open to scheduled international operations, 
and beyond to any points outside of China, with full traffic rights.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register 
Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2013-29530 Filed 12-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9x-P
```
#### § 2932.42 How long is my Special Recreation Permit valid?

You may request a permit for a day, season of use, or other time period, up to a maximum of 10 years. BLM will determine the appropriate term on a case-by-case basis.

[69 FR 5706, Feb. 6, 2004]
### §254b. Privileges and immunities of mission of nonparty to Vienna Convention

With respect to a nonparty to the Vienna Convention, the mission, the members of the mission, their families, and diplomatic couriers shall enjoy the privileges and immunities specified in the Vienna Convention.

(Pub. L. 95–393, §3(b), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 808; Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §203(b)(2), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 291.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1982—Pub. L. 97–241 substituted "With respect to a nonparty to the Vienna Convention, the mission, the members of the mission, their families, and diplomatic couriers" for "Members of the mission of a sending state which has not ratified the Vienna Convention, their families, and the diplomatic couriers of such state,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–241 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 204 of Pub. L. 97–241, set out as an Effective Date note under section 4301 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective at end of ninety-day period beginning on Sept. 30, 1978, see section 9 of Pub. L. 95–393, set out as a note under section 254a of this title.
#### § 704.103 Removal of certain minimums when computing or paying compensation.

The minimum limitation on weekly compensation for disability established by section 6 of the LHWCA, 33 U.S.C. 906, and the minimum limit on the average weekly wages on which death benefits are to be computed under section 9 of the LHWCA, 33 U.S.C. 909, shall not apply in computing compensation and death benefits under this Act; section 2(a), 42 U.S.C. 1652(a).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 385

 338

 341

 338

 309

 308

 329

 322

 315

 321

 316

 325

 342

 321

 374

 392

 379

 348

 353

 361

 326

 328

 385

 340

 371

 388

 458

 420

 410

 394

 404

 255

 249

 251

 252

 251

 240

 244

 239

 236

 236

 242

 238

 235

 235

 244

 242

 242

 246

 248

 252

 253

 256

 259

 258

 256

 261

 265

 262

 265

 270

 274

 297

 276

 281

 285

 271

 259

 276

 274

 265

 273

 280

 272

 270

 272

 282

 284

 284

 275

 282

 286

 279

 284

 301

 289

 299

 305

 310

 303

 296

 303

 301

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

VICTORIA CANAL ON THE MIDDLE RIVER
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Ore deposits of the Coeur d'Alene district, Shoshone County, 
Idaho, with a section on the bleached rock in the Coeur d'Alene district

#### Professional Paper 445

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Study Area



#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp445 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: June 26, 2013 
12:29:06