alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §896. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §451, as added Oct. 7, 1978, Pub. L. 95–426, title IV, §402(a), 92 Stat. 978, related to special allowances to Foreign Service officers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

CORRECTED JUDGMENT RENDERED

AUGUST 22, 2014

NO. 03-12-00582-CR

Candelario Cerda, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgments requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgments that require correction. 

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgments as follows: we modify each judgment 

of conviction to state that the “Statute for Offense” is “22.011(a)(2)(A) Penal Code.” The 

judgments, as modified, are affirmed. The appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and the court below.
Exhibit 99.4 - Administrative Report of the Trust

                              Administrative Report
                                       for
            Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-061 (the "Trust")


                           Payment Date June 15, 2005
                             CUSIP Number 41659FDD3


(i)    the amount received by the Indenture Trustee from Hartford Life Insurance
       Company ("Hartford Life") as of the payment date in respect of the
       principal, interest and premium, if any, on Funding Agreement No. 405061
       (the "Funding Agreement") issued by Hartford Life Insurance Company
       ("Hartford Life").

                         Interest:         $7,472.29

                         Principal:        $0.00

(ii)   the amount of payment on such Payment Date to holders allocable to
       principal and interest on the notes of the Trust.

                         Interest:         $7,472.29

                         Principal:        $0.00

(iii)  the aggregate stated principal amount of the Funding Agreement, the
       current interest rate or rates thereon at the close of business on such
       Payment Date, and the current rating assigned to the Funding Agreement.

               Aggregate Principal Amount:         $2,325,015.00

               Interest Rate:                      4.81%

                               Ratings:

                                       Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                       Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

(iv)   the aggregate principal balance of the notes of the Trust at the close of
       business on such Payment Date and the current rating assigned to such
       notes.

                               Aggregate Principal Amount: $2,325,000.00

                               Ratings:

                                       Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                       Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

AMACAR Pacific Corp., as administrator of Hartford Life Global Funding
Trust 2005-061

By:    /s/  Evelyn Echevarria
       --------------------------
       Name:    Evelyn Echevarria
       Title:   Vice President


                                       1
#### Charles Czeizinger, Appellant, v. Grover A. Winch et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence presents disputed questions of fact which require determination by the trier of the fact. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint as to defendants Winch in an action to rescind a contract.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Larkin, Love and Kimball, JJ.
## Tamara A. l~'ondell,

Owner Goldsmith Gallery Sincerely, . Thank you for yow: 

## consideration and issuance of the Air Carrier Certificate to Harris Air thusly helping communities in SE Alaska that rely on this fine company for flight service. Without the professional, flexible, safe and consistent manner that Harris conducts their business and provides service to 

## SE Alaska, our business simply would not be able to exist. We must be able to transport both staff and freight weekly between Sitka and Hoonah. Harris 

## Air has been our carrier to accomplish that task. We want to encourage the Alaska DOT to issue an Air Carrier Certificate to Harris 

## Air. Our company has worked 

## with Harris for more than three years to 

## fly our staff as well as freight to and from Sitka, Hoonah and Juneau. We have found Harris Air to 

## be invaluable to our business operations. To whom it may concern, Re: Harris Air application for Air Carrier Certificate Alaska 

## DOT September 7, 2014 . "

• ' I ~ '

"l

_~~~ " " 

# ';_", Goldsmith Gallery Bayview Trading Co •• 407 Uncoln St. • Sitka, Alaska 99835. (907}-747-5744. gold@alaskajewelry.com :

- ,

.. .'.. ; . ' . r-------------- ---- --- - - - -- - --- - -- - - - . . . - . . . ------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 826.23

 826.12

 826.04

 825.95

 825.89

 825.81

 825.75

 825.67

 825.59

 825.47

 825.35

 825.27

 825.13

 825.05

 824.88

 824.73

 824.61

 824.49

 824.35

 823.66

 822.78

 821.93

 821.08

 820.25

 819.32

 818.40

 817.51

 816.60

 815.66

 814.72

 33.19

 33.08

 33.00

 32.91

 32.85

 32.76

 32.70

 32.62

 32.54

 32.42

 32.30

 32.21

 32.07

 31.99

 31.82

 31.67

 31.55

 31.43

 31.29

 30.61

 29.75

 28.94

 28.13

 27.36

 26.52

 25.69

 24.91

 24.13

 23.33

 22.55

STORAGE

-0.10

-0.11

-0.08

-0.09

-0.06

-0.08

-0.06

-0.08

-0.08

-0.12

-0.12

-0.08

-0.14

-0.08

-0.17

-0.15

-0.12

-0.12

-0.14

-0.68

-0.86

-0.82

-0.80

-0.77

-0.85

-0.82

-0.78

-0.79

-0.80

-0.78

CHANGE

211

204

221

213

232

222

235

221

222

198

196

222

192

222

175

187

201

202

192

188

151

166

171

186

145

157

173

169

161

166

INFLOW

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 248

 247

 247

 247

 247

 247

 247

 246

 247

 246

 246

 246

 246

 246

 246

 247

 246

 246

 246

 516

 569

 566

 564

 562

 560

 558

 556

 554

 551

 548

OUTLET

 10

 9

 10

 8

 11

 11

 14

 13

 13

 11

 9

 14

 14

 14

 12

 13

 12

 13

 13

 13

 12

 11

 11

 12

 13

 14

 11

 11

 11

 11

C.F.S.

 .29

 .27

 .30

 .24

 .32

 .35

 .43

 .40

 .41

 .34

 .27

 .43

 .44

 .42

 .38

 .39

 .38

 .41

 .42

 .40

 .38

 .36

 .38

 .40

 .45

 .48

 .40

 .39

 .39

 .42

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2015 RUN DATE: 07/24/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -10.73 5,801 10,788 76 354 11.34 .16

ACRE-FEET -10,730 11,506 21,398 151 702

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 151

OUTLET

TOTAL

 21,398

 21,549

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .16

JULY 1, 2014 19.73

 33.30

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### Gregory C. EPPERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Helen F. FAHEY, Chairwoman, Virginia Parole Board; Gene Johnson, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-7652.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.

Decided: March 3, 2006.

Gregory C. Epperson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gregory C. Epperson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Epperson v. Fahey,*No. CA-05-523 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 23 *&*entered Sept. 26, 2005). We deny Epperson’s motion to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *775presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
§ 404.2109 Responsibility for making payment decisions. The Commissioner will decide— ( a ) Whether a continuous period of 9 months of SGA has been completed;
( b ) Whether a disability beneficiary whose disability has ceased should continue to receive benefits under § 404.316(c), 404.337(c), or 404.352(c) for a month after October 1984, based on his or her continued participation in a VR program;
( c ) If and when medical recovery has occurred;
( d ) Whether documentation of VR services and expenditures is adequate;
( e ) If payment is to be based on completion of a continuous 9-month period of SGA, whether the VR services contributed to the continuous period of SGA;
( f ) Whether a VR service is a service described in § 404.2114; and
( g ) What VR costs were reasonable and necessary and will be paid.
[55 FR 8454, Mar. 8, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 11914, Mar. 15, 1994; 68 FR 40123, July 7, 2003]
### §1752. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–134, §3, Oct. 18, 1983, 97 Stat. 852, which set out definitions for this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Iowa First  Bancshares  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kim K.
Bartling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Kim K. Bartling
-----------------------------------
Kim K. Bartling
Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer & Treasurer



May 16, 2005


                                       1
| Date:   August 5, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ Joseph J. MarcAurele                        |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |   | Joseph J. MarcAurele                            |
|                                       |   |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                       |   |   | (principal executive officer)                   |

| Date:   August 5, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ David V. Devault                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                       |   |   | David V. Devault                                                |
|                                       |   |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|                                       |   |   | (principal financial and accounting officer)                    |
#### STATE, Respondent, v. GUFFEY, Appellant.

(216 N. W. 860.)

(File No. 6428.

Opinion filed December 20, 1927.)

*96
      *Robert C. Hayes*and *John T. Heffron,*both of Deadwood, for Appellant.

*Buell P. Jones,*Attorney General, and *H. A. Linstrom,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

CAMPBELL, P. J.

This matter is before us at this time pursuant to order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed.

The brief of appellant was filed in this court on September 2, 1927, and the conclusion thereof reads as follows:

“Since preparing the above brief, and before the printing was completed, information is received by phone from the hospital at Ft. Meade that Joshua A. Guffey had just died from gunshot wounds received at the hands of assailants who had attacked him with rifles in the vicinity of his cattle range.

“The judgment in this action is for some $2,300 costs. We deem it proper to print and submit this statement and brief, for the reason that, if the judgment is reversed, the judgment for costs will fall with it. The estate of Joshua Guffey may be permitted to substitute the administrator in the interests of the estate so far as the costs are concerned. The appeal was from the whole of said judgment,' which would include the costs.”

Thereafter, upon affidavit and certified copy of death certificate, pursuant to order to show cause, the Attorney General moved for the dismissal of the appeal upon the ground of the death of the defendant and appellant.

It is, of course, the general rule that the death of appellant pending appeal or writ of error in a criminal cause is ground for the dismissal, and we are of the opinion that any question as to costs is incidental only, and the fact that costs may be involved should not prevent the dismissal. Blackwell v. State, 185 Ind. 227, 113 N. E. 723; March v. State, 5 Tex. App. 450; O’Sullivan v. People, 144 Ill. 604, 32 N. E. 192, 20 L. R. A. 143; Yota v. State, 10 Okl. Cr. 26, 133 P. 257.

■Whether the estate of Guffey is liable for the costs adjudged below is not before us, and we express no opinion thereon.

An order will be entered dismissing the appeal.

POLLBY, SHERWOOD, BIURCH, and BROWN, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5                          

       

<S>                                <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1996             
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                              10,000          
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                    2,020,827
<ALLOWANCES>                       (50,000)
<INVENTORY>                      3,482,420
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 5,658,611
<PP&E>                           5,395,874
<DEPRECIATION>                  (3,512,914)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   7,747,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,532,807
<BONDS>                                  0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                      2,915,503
<COMMON>                             4,215
<OTHER-SE>                         112,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     7,747,570
<SALES>                          7,705,391
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 7,705,391
<CGS>                            6,175,942
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    7,603,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 141,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    (39,256)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                (39,256)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         (.09)
#### Lew Morris, Appellant, *v.*Gustav A. Mezger, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Dore, J.

(concurring). I concur for affirmance solely on the ground that on this appeal plaintiff has restricted his claim only to recover damages by reason of defendant’s failure to issue and deliver stock to plaintiff in Mastercraft Builders, Inc.

Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan and Yan Yoorhis, JJ., concur in decision; Dore, J., concurs in result, in opinion.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. [See *post,*p. 709.]
#### Ladislaus Farago, Plaintiff, *v.*New York Railways Company, Defendant.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 20th day of December, 1913, denying a motion to confirm the report of a referee to discontinue the action and to cancel an attorney’s lien.

Per Curiam:

We are satisfied that the learned Special Term was right in finding that the attorney had been duly retained. We see no reason why an end should not be put to this controversy. The agreement was that the attorney should receive thirty-three and one-third per cent upon a settlement and fifty per cent upon a judgment. The case was settled for $870. The order appealed from should, therefore, be modified by providing that the defendant’s motion to discontinue be granted upon the payment to plaintiff’s attorney, Sigmund S. Rotter, of $290, one-third of the amount of settlement, $10 costs of the motion below, $10 costs on this appeal and the respondent’s disbursements, and as so modified affirmed. Present—-Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion and as-modified affirmed. Order to be settled on notice.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000420 16-FEB-2018 01:30 PM
### §14a. Annual appropriations for maintenance, operation, and improvement of naval hospitals

Commencing with the fiscal year 1944, annual appropriations in such amounts as may be necessary are authorized from the general fund of the Treasury for the maintenance, operation, and improvement of naval hospitals.

(June 15, 1943, ch. 125, §1(c), 57 Stat. 152.)
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000792

18-MAR-2015

03:09 PM
December 2021

STORAGE ACRE-FEET SAN LUIS RELEASE - C.F.S. GAIN(+) OR EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY

ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING 

C.F.S

POWER PACHECO

TUNNEL

SPILL LOSS(-) C.F.S. C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

480,402

1 394.80 482,175 1,773 973 0 50 0 -29 15 0.06 0.00

2 395.01 483,796 1,621 907 0 51 0 -39 18 0.07 0.00

3 395.01 483,796 0 0 0 50 0 50 13 0.05 0.00

4 395.01 483,796 0 0 0 49 0 49 18 0.07 0.00

5 395.00 483,719 -77 0 0 48 0 9 3 0.01 0.01

6 394.99 483,641 -78 0 0 47 0 8 5 0.02 0.00

7 394.95 483,332 -309 0 0 46 0 -109 5 0.02 0.02

8 394.92 483,101 -231 0 0 47 0 -70 5 0.02 0.00

9 394.95 483,332 231 487 0 43 0 -326 5 0.02 0.16

10 394.95 483,332 0 87 0 39 0 -48 20 0.08 0.00

11 395.04 484,028 696 487 0 39 0 -97 33 0.13 0.00

12 395.04 484,028 0 0 0 39 0 39 10 0.04 0.00

13 395.40 486,812 2,784 1,461 0 6 0 -51 5 0.02 0.07

14 396.89 498,397 11,585 5,090 0 6 0 756 23 0.09 0.93

15 397.04 499,569 1,172 6,494 0 14 0 -5,883 23 0.09 0.02

16 400.10 523,700 24,131 6,976 0 20 0 5,205 10 0.04 0.40

17 401.45 534,480 10,780 6,874 0 17 0 -1,420 5 0.02 0.00

18 403.33 549,628 15,148 6,807 0 41 0 870 0 0.00 0.00

19 404.88 562,236 12,608 6,730 0 62 0 -312 19 0.07 0.00

20 405.91 570,673 8,437 4,460 0 74 0 -132 0 0.00 0.00

21 406.20 573,056 2,383 1,317 0 73 0 -43 5 0.02 0.00

22 406.58 576,186 3,130 1,751 0 70 0 -104 3 0.01 0.05

23 407.01 579,735 3,549 1,760 0 59 0 89 0 0.00 0.14

24 407.39 582,878 3,143 1,739 0 54 0 -100 0 0.00 0.33

25 407.79 586,193 3,315 1,733 0 53 0 -9 19 0.07 0.07

26 408.28 590,263 4,070 2,167 0 51 0 -64 16 0.06 0.33

27 408.77 594,345 4,082 2,116 0 54 0 -4 5 0.02 0.22

28 409.23 598,186 3,841 2,150 0 51 0 -163 0 0.00 0.11

29 409.75 602,539 4,353 2,150 0 65 0 109 11 0.04 0.17

30 410.57 609,427 6,888 3,823 0 57 0 -293 11 0.04 0.07

31 411.39 616,345 6,918 3,760 0 59 0 -213 14 0.05 0.00

TOTALS 135,943 72,299 0 1,434 0 -2,325 319 1.23 3.10

ACRE-FEET 135,943 143,405 0 2,844 0 -4,618 633

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 0 Spill 0

Pacheco Tunnel 2,844

Total 2,844

Precipitation

This month = 3.10

October 01, 2021 To date = 4.33

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 9/26/2023
### §9241b. Sanctions on foreign persons employing North Korean labor

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (c), the President shall designate any person identified under section 9241(b)(3) of this title for the imposition of sanctions under subsection (b).

#### (b) Imposition of sanctions

#### (1) In general

The President shall impose the sanctions described in paragraph (2) with respect to any person designated under subsection (a).

#### (2) Sanctions described

The sanctions described in this paragraph are sanctions pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to block and prohibit all transactions in property and interests in property of a person designated under subsection (a), if such property and interests in property are in the United States, come within the United States, or are or come within the possession or control of a United States person.

#### (c) Exception

#### (1) In general

A person may not be designated under subsection (a) if the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that the President has received reliable assurances from such person that—

(A) the employment of North Korean laborers does not result in the direct or indirect transfer of convertible currency, luxury goods, or other stores of value to the Government of North Korea;

(B) all wages and benefits are provided directly to the laborers, and are held, as applicable, in accounts within the jurisdiction in which they reside in locally denominated currency; and

(C) the laborers are subject to working conditions consistent with international standards.

#### (2) Recertification

Not later than 180 days after the date on which the President transmits to the appropriate congressional committees an initial certification under paragraph (1), and every 180 days thereafter, the President shall—

(A) transmit a recertification stating that the conditions described in such paragraph continue to be met; or

(B) if such recertification cannot be transmitted, impose the sanctions described in subsection (b) beginning on the date on which the President determines that such recertification cannot be transmitted.

(Pub. L. 114–122, title III, §302B, as added Pub. L. 115–44, title III, §321(b)(1), Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 952.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is title II of Pub. L. 95–223, Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1626, which is classified generally to chapter 35 (§1701 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1701 of Title 50 and Tables.