alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.N E S ®
iVIarch 23, 2015
Kevin Schlemmer OtliceofAviation Analysis US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave SE Washington, D.C. 20590 SkyWest Airlines' Essential AirService Hold-In Rate for Pueblo, CO
DearMr. Schlemmer: Attached is SkyWest Airlines' proposal for a hold-in rate for direct air service from Pueblo, CO to Denver, CO. On November 18, 2014 SkyWestgavea 90 day notice that it would discontinue service from Pueblo, CO to Denver. CO underthe EAS program. As SkyWestis currentlyheldin beyond the 90 day notice period and is awaitinga replacement carrier, we have requested a new hold-in rate tor service. This rate increase is dueto tleet changes at SkyWest. SkyWest is retiring the 30 passenger EMB-120 Brasilia and is replacing them with 50 passengerCRJ-200's. Pueblo, CO service moved to CRJ-200 serviceon February I, 2015, where service continues at 12 scheduled weeklyround-trips. SkyWest requests the new hold-in rate to be effectivebeginningMarch I, 2015.
Thank you for yourconsideration.

Greg Atkin iVIanaging Director, Market Development SkyWestAirlinesSkyWestAirlines Essential Air Service Hold-In Rate 3/23/2015 PUB DEN Numberofround-trips per week 12 Aircraft type CRJ200 Passenger Revenue Passengers 11,400 Average fare $ 55.00 Revenue $ 627,000 Block Time Trip block time (minutes) 48 Total scheduled block time 998 Total completed block time 98% 978 RPMS Passengers 11,400 Stage length 109 1,242,600 ASMs Scheduled departures 1,248 Competeddepartures 98% 1,223 Stage length 109 Available Seats 

### so 6,801,600
Revenue $ 627,000 Direct operating expenses $ 2,641,766 RPM related $ 4,237 Departure related $ 868,517 ASM related $ 63,391 Total expenses $ 3,577,912 Operating income (loss) $ (2,950,912) 5% profit margin $ 178,896 Annual subsidy requirement 

## s 3,129,808 SkyWest effective rates per unit Cost per trip 

## s 2,925 Cost per passenger $ 314 SkyWest cost per block hour $ 3,657 Effective Subsidy rate per unit Subsidy pertrip $ 2,559 Subsidy per passenger $ 275
Load factor 18%
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51263 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LUIS ANGEL MURILLO-PAYAN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:01-CR-319-2-AML

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Luis Angel Murillo-Payan, federal prisoner # 18272-180, appeals the district court’s denial of his request for mandamus relief. Specifically, Murillo-Payan argues that by failing to designate the State Prison System in Oklahoma as the place of confinement for service of his federal sentence, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has essentially rendered his federal and state sentences consecutive rather than concurrent, in violation of hisNo. 04-51263 -2- plea agreement, the district court’s judgment, and the Fifth Amendment. Murillo-Payan has failed to establish a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief. The extraordinary remedy of mandamus is not available to review the discretionary acts of officials. Giddings v. Chandler , 979 F.2d 1104, 1108 (5th Cir. 1992)
. Although the Attorney General, through the BOP, has discretion to designate a state facility as the place in which a federal prisoner serves his sentence, the prisoner has no constitutional right to placement in a particular facility. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b); Moore v. United States Att’y Gen. , 473 F.2d 1375, 1376 (5th Cir. 1973). Although the district court may recommend the place of imprisonment, the district court’s recommendation is not binding on the BOP. See 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b)(4); United States v. Voda , 994 F.2d 149, 151-52 (5th Cir. 1993). Moreover, contrary to Murillo-Payan’s contention, the plea agreement contained no promise that his federal sentence would be ordered to run concurrently with his previously imposed
state sentence. Finally, Murillo-Payan may seek administrative relief from the BOP and, if denied, pursue habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Rourke v. Thompson , 11 F.3d 47, 49 (5th Cir. 1993). Therefore, Murillo-Payan has a remedy available to him and the district court did not err by denying his request forNo. 04-51263 -3- mandamus relief. See In re Willy , 831 F.2d 545, 549 (5th Cir. 1987), aff’d , 503 U.S. 131 (1992). Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
### §1776k. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–444, §13, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4643, which authorized appropriations, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1/4/13 page of 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-13-0063 Reviewer: Tobias/SS 

 

 

Results Table: Dose, Concentration, and Days Exceeded Results Summary 

Exposure Scenario1 Water Landfill Stack Air Fugitive Air 

Drinking Water Fish Ingestion 

ADR LADD ADR LADD 7Q104 

CC = 1 

PDM 

Days 

Exceede

d 

LADD ADR LADD ADR LADD 

Release 

activity(ies)2; 

exposure 

calculation(s)3 

mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day μg/l # Days mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day mg/kg/day 

 max acute eco --- --- --- --- 1.60E+00 --- --- --- --- --- --- 

1 Exposure scenario titles consist of release activity followed by exposure calculation abbreviation. 

2 Release activities are from engineering report's Manufacturing (Mfg), Processing (Proc) and Use release 

activity labels.Multiple release activities are combined in one exposure scenario if their releases occur at 

same location. 

3 Exposure calculations are Acute Dose Rate (ADR), Lifetime Average Daily Dose (LADD), and 

Probabilistic Dilution Model (PDM). There may be one, two, or all three exposure calculations per exposure 

scenario.CC is the aquatic concentration of concern. 

4 This column displays concentration values for the 7Q10 streamflow, which is defined as the average daily 

streamflow of the seven consecutive days of lowest flow within a ten year period. 

Remarks: 
1/4/13 page of 

 POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P-13-0063 Assessor: Tobias/SS 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES 

 Scenario#:1 Number of Release Sites: 

 Release Activity: : Max ADR 

 Release Description: WATER LANDFILL 

Non-sludge/Sludge 

STACK FUGITIVE 

Total Releases: 

 (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) (kg/yr) 

 

 Non-sludge/Sludge 

Release Days/yr: 

Per Site Release: 

 (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) (kg/site/day) 

Remarks: 
1/4/13 page of 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P-13-0063 

SIC-CODE BASED HUMAN AND AQUATIC EXPOSURES TO SURFACE WATER RELEASES 

SCENARIO #: 1 Number of Sites: RELEASE ACTIVITY: Max 

ADR 

SIC-CODE DESCRIPTION: POTW's (All facilities) 

SIC-CODE (S): 4952 EXPOSED POPULATION: Adult 

WWT 

REMOVAL 

(%) 

RELEASE 

DAYS 

PRETREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(kg/site/day) 

POSTTREATMENT 

RELEASE 

(kg/site/day) 

DWT 

(%) BCF 

(L/kg) 

 0.00 0.00 

AQUATIC EXPOSURE ESTIMATES - SURFACE WATER 

PLANT 

TYPE 

% ILE 

FACILITY 

STREAM FLOW (MLD) STREAM CONC. (μg/l) 

Harmonic 

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 

Harmonic 

Mean 30Q5 7Q10 1Q10 

ALL 50 125.56 44.02 26.80 22.53 1.35E-02 3.86E-02 6.34E-02 7.55E-02

ALL 10 11.11 1.94 1.06 0.96 0.15 0.88 1.60 1.77 

DRINKING WATER AND FISH INGESTION EXPOSURE ESTIMATES 

Exposure Units 

Drinking Water Results Drinking 

Water Units Fish Ingestion Results 

Fish 

Ingestion 

Units 

50% 10% 50% 10% 

Cancer 

LADDpot 2.89E-10 3.27E-09 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day 

LADCpot 1.48E-08 1.68E-07 mg/L 0.00 0.00 mg/kg 

Acute 

ADRpot 3.23E-06 7.32E-05 mg/kg/day 0.00 0.00 mg/kg/day 

SIC Code Comments:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q/A



(Mark One)

/X/  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
     ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
                               -------------------------------------------------

                                       OR

/ /  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                        to
                               ----------------------    -----------------------


                        Commission file number 000-22281

                                 24HOLDINGS INC.
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

            DELAWARE                                     33-0726608
(State or other jurisdiction of             (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 incorporation or organization)

                                  Cyberia House
                           Church Street, Basingstoke
                               Hampshire RG21 7QN
                                 United Kingdom
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                                +44 1256 867 800
                               (Telephone number)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) had been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  X      No
                                               ---        ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes       No  X
                                                 ---      ---
<PAGE>
              APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
                  PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan
confirmed by a court.  Yes  X      No
                           ---        ---

                      APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

     Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding at November 10, 2004:
96,147,395.


                                EXPLANATORY NOTE
                                ----------------

This amendment on Form 10-Q/A is being filed with respect to the registrant's
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2004, solely to
correct a clerical error in the EDGAR period tag contained in the original
filing.
#### James Warren THOMPSON, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12004.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Dec. 16, 1954.

Decided April 19, 1955.

Petition for Rehearing Denied May 9, 1955.

Mr. James J. Laughlin, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Albert J. Ahern, Jr., Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Victor W. Caputy, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before BAZELON, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find no prejudicial error in this appeal from a conviction for armed robbery. D.C.Code § 22-2901 (1951).

Affirmed.
### §128. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–317, §2(3), Dec. 27, 2022, 136 Stat. 4419

Section, act Mar. 3, 1875, ch. 132, §2, 18 Stat. 449, prohibited payment of appropriations made for the Indian Service to Indians at war with the United States.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 783.19

 783.19

 789.20

 789.12

 789.08

 789.01

 788.92

 788.87

 788.65

 788.50

 788.44

 788.46

 788.41

 788.33

 788.28

 788.18

 788.12

 788.07

 787.97

 787.94

 787.90

 787.83

 787.86

 787.70

 787.65

 787.55

 787.53

 787.45

 787.38

 787.35

 787.28

 5.00

 5.00

 7.16

 7.13

 7.11

 7.08

 7.05

 7.03

 6.94

 6.89

 6.86

 6.87

 6.85

 6.82

 6.80

 6.76

 6.74

 6.72

 6.68

 6.67

 6.66

 6.63

 6.64

 6.58

 6.56

 6.52

 6.52

 6.49

 6.46

 6.45

 6.42

STORAGE

-2.24

+0.00

+2.16

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.04

-0.02

-0.09

-0.06

-0.02

+0.01

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.04

-0.01

-0.02

-0.03

+0.01

-0.06

-0.02

-0.04

-0.01

-0.03

-0.03

-0.01

-0.03

CHANGE

-1,117

11

1,098

-5

3

-2

-4

2

-31

-17

0

17

2

-4

1

-9

-1

1

-8

5

3

-3

17

-19

0

-9

6

-7

-3

5

-2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 4

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

OUTLET

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 7

 6

 7

 7

 7

 7

 8

 7

 6

 6

 5

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 5

 6

 6

 5

 5

 5

 3

 6

 6

 6

C.F.S.

 .54

 .54

 .49

 .49

 .50

 .53

 .51

 .57

 .53

 .54

 .56

 .64

 .53

 .50

 .49

 .44

 .47

 .50

 .47

 .45

 .45

 .44

 .49

 .50

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .29

 .47

 .52

 .47

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JULY 2021 RUN DATE: 09/02/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.85 -70 154 3 186 15.27 .00

ACRE-FEET -850 -139 305 6 369

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 6

OUTLET

TOTAL

 305

 311

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2021 .00

 7.24

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 5.64
Exhibit 32
                            ----------


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laser Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Rodney M. Tiede and  Randy L. Turner, Chief Executive Officer, President  and
Chief Financial Officer , respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and
       15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
       the Company.


November 19, 2003


/s/ Rodney M. Tiede
----------------------------------
Rodney M. Tiede
Chief Executive Officer, President


/s/ Randy L. Turner
-----------------------------------
Randy L. Turner
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4672 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4672

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
  exception for marginal production from the taxable income limit on 
          percentage depletion for oil and natural gas wells.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2016

Ms. Jenkins of Kansas introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
  exception for marginal production from the taxable income limit on 
          percentage depletion for oil and natural gas wells.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FOR MARGINAL PRODUCTION FROM TAXABLE INCOME LIMIT 
              ON PERCENTAGE DEPLETION FOR OIL AND NATURAL GAS WELLS 
              MADE PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 613A(c)(6)(H) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                    ``(H) Taxable income limit not applicable to 
                marginal production.--The second sentence of subsection 
                (a) of section 613 shall not apply to so much of the 
                allowance for depletion as is determined under 
                subparagraph (A).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Figure 1.9. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the downstream vicinity of 63rd Street.

94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

0

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

50 100 150 200 METERS

39°00'50"

39°01'10"

39°01'

Hardesty

Avenue

63rd Street

EXPLANATION

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 41,920 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 766 feet

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA

|                        |  |             
|----------------------- |  | ------------
|To Whom It May Concern: |  | May 22, 2002

The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC consents to the inclusion of his report of
May 22, 2002 accompanying the audited financial statements of Investment
Agents, Inc., as at February 28, 2002, in the Form 10KSB with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Kyle L. Tingle

Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC

P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452,
Fax: (702) 436-4218, e-mail: Ktingle@worldnet.att.net
### SUBCHAPTER LXXX—HOOPA-YUROK SETTLEMENT
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, (the Form 10-Q),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 5, 2005
    /s/ James K. B. HeskethJames K. B. HeskethChief Executive Officer
### §225a. Definitions

For the purpose of this subchapter:

(1) The term "Hospital" means the institution in the District of Columbia known as Saint Elizabeths Hospital operated on November 8, 1984, by the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(2) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(3) The term "Mayor" means the Mayor of the District of Columbia.

(4) The term "District" means the District of Columbia.

(5) The term "Federal court consent decree" means the consent decree in Dixon v. Heckler, Civil Action No. 74–285.

(6) The term "service coordination period" means a period beginning on October 1, 1985, and terminating on October 1, 1987.

(7) The term "financial transition period" means a period beginning on October 1, 1985, and terminating on October 1, 1991.

(8) The term "system implementation plan" means the plan for a comprehensive mental health system for the District of Columbia to be developed pursuant to this subchapter.

(9) The term "Council" means the Council of the District of Columbia.

(Pub. L. 98–621, §3, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3371.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57336-57337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21527]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2004-19167]


Statutory Monetary Civil Penalty Increase for Bridge Violations

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to inform the public that on August 9, 2004, 
President Bush signed the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act 
of 2004 which, in part, increases the monetary civil penalty amount the 
Coast Guard can levy for a violation of bridge regulations and 
statutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice, 
call Chris Jaufmann, Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-0368.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 33 U.S.C 495(b), 499(c), 502(c), and 533(b), 
authorizes assessing penalties for violations of bridge regulations 
found in 33 CFR parts 115, 116, 117, and 118. The maximum penalty 
amount that could be levied per bridge violation per day was $1,000. In 
1997, the maximum penalty amount was raised to $1,100 to adjust for 
inflation.
    On August 9, 2004 President Bush signed the Coast Guard and 
Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 into law. (Pub. L. 108-293) section 
601 of this act, raises the maximum civil penalty amount that the Coast 
Guard can levy per bridge violation per day from $1,100 to $5000 for 
the remainder of 2004. The Act then raises that amount by $5000 
increments at the start of each calendar year until 2008 when the 
maximum amount allowed per violation per day will be $25,000. Thus, the 
penalty is $5,000 for a violation occurring in 2004; $10,000 for a 
violation occurring in 2005; $15,000 for a violation occurring in 2006; 
$20,000 for a violation occurring in 2007; and $25,000 for a violation 
occurring in 2008 and every year after that. This increase took effect 
immediately upon signature.


[[Page 57337]]


    Dated: September 20, 2004.
N.E. Mpras,
Chief, Office of Bridge Administration.
[FR Doc. 04-21527 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P