alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of UCI
Medical Affiliates, Inc. ("UCI"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report
of UCI on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI. This written
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided
to UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


February 13, 2008           /s/ D. Michael Stout, M.D.
                            ----------------------------
                            D. Michael Stout, M.D.
                            President and Chief Executive Officer


                            /s/ Jerry F. Wells, Jr., CPA
                            Jerry F. Wells, Jr., CPA
                            Executive Vice President and
                            Chief Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRare Earth Doped High Temperature Ceramic Selective EmittersAs a result of their electron structure, rare earth ions in crystals at high temperature emit radiation in several narrow bands rather than in a continuous blackbody manner. This study develops a spectral emittance model for films of rare earth containing materials. Although there are several possible rare earth doped high temperature materials, this study was confined to rare earth aluminum garnets. Good agreement between experimental and theoretical spectral emittances was found for erbium, thulium and erbium-holmium aluminum garnets. Spectral emittances of these films are sensitive to temperature differences across the film. Emitter efficiency is also a sensitive function of temperature. For thulium aluminum garnet the efficiency is 0.38 at 1700 K but only 0.19 at 1262 K.Document ID19990021239Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsChubb, Donald L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Pal, AnnaMarie*(Essential Research, Inc. Cleveland, OH United States)*Patton, Martin O.*(Essential Research, Inc. Cleveland, OH United States)*Jenkins, Phillip P.*(Essential Research, Inc. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1999Subject CategorySolid-State PhysicsReport/Patent NumberE-11275NASA/TM-1999-208491NAS 1.15:208491Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 910-30-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990021239.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1760. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–134, §11, Oct. 18, 1983, 97 Stat. 856, which provided for severability of provisions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro ANAYA-GOMEZ, also known as Enrique Nava-Vasquez, also known as Jose Hernandez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40917.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Pedro Anaya-Gomez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States. He argues that the provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Anaya-Gomez’s *300constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Anaya-Gomez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Anaya-Gomez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 2522.3 Act of March 28, 1908.

Under the provisions of the Act of March 28, 1908 (35 Stat. 52; 43 U.S.C. 333), the period of 4 years may be extended, in the discretion of the authorized officer, for an additional period not exceeding 3 years, if, by reason of some unavoidable delay in the construction of the irrigating works intended to convey water to the land, the entryman is unable to make proof of reclamation and cultivation required within the 4 years. This does not mean that the period within which proof may be made will be extended as a matter of course for 3 years. Applications for extension under said act will not be granted unless it be clearly shown that the failure to reclaim and cultivate the land within the regular period of 4 years was due to no fault on the part of the entryman but to some unavoidable delay in the construction of the irrigation works for which he was not responsible and could not have readily foreseen (37 L.D. 332). It must also appear that he has complied with the law as to annual expenditures and proof thereof.
§ 670.555 What are the center's responsibilities in ensuring that students' religious rights are respected? ( a ) Centers must ensure that a student has the right to worship or not worship as he or she chooses.
( b ) Students who believe their religious rights have been violated may file complaints under the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 37.
( c ) Requirements related to equal treatment of religious organizations in Department of Labor programs, and to protection of religious liberty of Department of Labor social service providers and beneficiaries, are found at subpart D of 29 CFR part 2. *See also* §§ 667.266 and 667.275 of 20 CFR; 29 CFR part 37.
[65 FR 49450, Aug. 11, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 41891, July 12, 2004]
#### Mary E. Schiffer, as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, v. New York Yacht, Launch and Engine Company, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. So opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard H. De Voto, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Resources
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,
         2003, (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Date: May 14, 2003                           /s/ Richard H. De Voto
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Richard H. De Voto
                                             Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 4.16**

**Summary of Translation**

**of**

**Agreement by and between**

**e-Future (Beijing) Tornado Information TechnologyInc.**

**and**

**Limen(China) Group**

On March 19, 2006 Limen (China) Group, Walt Disney China’s exclusive franchisee, manufacturer and strategicpartner in China, signed an exclusive strategic partnership agreement with e-Future Beijing in the aggregate amount of 10.47 million Chinese yuan. Pursuant to this agreement, e-Future will provide Limen with the enterprise software solutionsfor Limen’s retail information system (integrated with e-Future ONE POS-ERP R2003, e-Future ONE Blue SCM R2005, e-Future ONE e-Card R2005, e-Future ONE BI V3) and with four years of outsourcing services. 

Limen’s business plan is to open 100 Mickey’s Space chain stores in China by 2007 and 500 Mickey’s Space chain stores by 2010.Mickey’s Space retail stores are expected to sell 20,000 different kinds of Walt Disney authorized products, covering furniture, electronic appliances, food, clothes, etc.
(No. 871

Claimant awarded $5,808.10 with interest.).

#### Adele V. Harris Whiting, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1925.*

Inheritance *tax*— when *claimant entitled to refund. Sec. 25. Appeal.*Where an appeal has been taken'from an order of court assessing the tax under Sec. 25, Inheritance Tax Law, and upon a re-hearing of the appeal the court finds that the tax should he reduced by reason of the termination of the trust provided for in the will, claimant is entitled to a refund of the difference between the tax paid under the order of court on appeal and the amount found due upon the re-hearing of the appeal.

Continental and Commercial Trust and Savings Bank, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

The claimant, Adele V. Harris Whiting, files this claim for refund of inheritance tax under Section 25 of the Inheritance Tax laws of Illinois.

Elinor S. Harris, a resident of Cook County, Illinois, died in Chicago September 25, 1916, leaving a last will and testament, which was duly probated in said county, and Graham H. Harris and Bradford Whiting were appointed and qualified as executors.

January 2, 1917, the county judge entered an order fixing the inheritance tax at $43,530.89, from which order an appeal was taken to the county court, and on hearing the court found that the report of appraisers and the order entered thereon were erroneous in the deductions allowed to the appellant, the sum of $40,811.30 had been paid under the original assessment and order so erroneously made and entered March 20, 1917. On the re-hearing the court found that by reason of the termination of the trust provided' for in said will, that the correct amount of inheritance tax as shown by the re-assessment was $35,003.20, leaving the sum of $5808.10, with inter-' est thereon at the rate of *3%*per annum.from March 20,1917, to which the claimant is entitled to have refunded.

The Attorney General consents, in writing, to a claim for claimant in the said sum of $5808.10, and the court accordingly, from the evidence and such consent, awards to claimant the said sum of $5808.10, with *3%*interest from March 20, 1917.
Document

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF 
ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.
ENPHASE ENERGY, INC., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies that: 
FIRST: The name of the Corporation is ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. (the "Corporation").
SECOND: The Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation was originally filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on March 20, 2006 under the name “PVI Solutions, Inc.”
THIRD: The Board of Directors of the Corporation, acting in accordance with the provisions of Sections 141 and 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, adopted resolutions to amend its Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as follows: 
1. Article IV, Section A shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 
“(A) This Corporation is authorized to issue two classes of stock to be designated, respectively, “Common Stock” and “Preferred Stock.” The total number of shares that this Corporation is authorized to issue is Three Hundred and Ten Million (310,000,000) shares, each with a par value of $0.00001 per share. Three Hundred Million (300,000,000) shares of which shall be Common Stock and Ten Million (10,000,000) shares of which shall be Preferred Stock.” 
FOURTH: Thereafter pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Directors, this Certificate of Amendment was submitted to the stockholders of the Corporation for their approval, and was duly adopted at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 19, 2021 in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Enphase Energy, Inc. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by its Chief Executive Officer this 19th day of May, 2021. 
 
												
				
			ENPHASE ENERGY, INC.

			
			By:
	 /s/ Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman

				Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman
President and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.24

 508.03

 508.14

 508.15

 508.35

 508.98

 507.98

 508.60

 508.41

 508.55

 508.34

 508.55

 508.06

 508.06

 508.19

 508.35

 509.00

 508.84

 508.97

 508.88

 508.60

 508.23

 508.20

 508.85

 508.85

 508.64

 509.06

 509.67

 509.10

 507.48

 508.52

 64,784

 64,526

 64,661

 64,674

 64,920

 65,695

 64,465

 65,228

 64,994

 65,166

 64,908

 65,166

 64,563

 64,563

 64,723

 64,920

 65,720

 65,523

 65,683

 65,572

 65,228

 64,772

 64,735

 65,535

 65,535

 65,277

 65,795

 66,556

 65,845

 63,859

 65,129

STORAGE

-751

-258

+135

+13

+246

+775

-1,230

+763

-234

+172

-258

+258

-603

+0

+160

+197

+800

-197

+160

-111

-344

-456

-37

+800

+0

-258

+518

+761

-711

-1,986

+1,270

CHANGE

1,715

1,988

2,184

2,140

2,212

2,496

1,488

2,477

1,960

2,158

1,943

2,097

1,655

1,999

2,036

2,032

2,323

1,837

2,020

1,859

1,828

1,816

2,056

2,495

2,092

1,973

2,350

2,470

1,742

1,103

2,743

INFLOW

 1,675

 1,686

 1,679

 1,679

 1,679

 1,682

 1,675

 1,678

 1,681

 1,681

 1,681

 1,680

 1,684

 1,678

 1,677

 1,678

 1,680

 1,566

 1,677

 1,678

 1,675

 1,672

 1,682

 1,679

 1,684

 1,674

 1,669

 1,666

 1,666

 1,662

 1,678

POWER

 100

 165

 184

 198

 198

 200

 199

 198

 199

 199

 200

 132

 100

 99

 99

 99

 100

 199

 101

 101

 168

 199

 199

 200

 201

 200

 201

 203

 203

 198

 197

SPILL

 303

 252

 239

 244

 198

 209

 220

 202

 184

 179

 175

 137

 158

 205

 164

 139

 125

 159

 147

 120

 142

 159

 179

 195

 189

 211

 203

 202

 215

 229

 211

OUTLET

 16

 15

 14

 12

 13

 14

 14

 14

 14

 12

 17

 18

 17

 17

 15

 17

 15

 12

 14

 16

 16

 16

 15

 18

 18

 18

 16

 15

 16

 15

 17

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/21/2000

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -406 63,287 51,881 5,239 5,894 476

ACRE-FEET -406 125,530 102,906 10,392 11,691 944

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 102,906

SPILL 10,392 124,989

 65,535

OUTLET 11,691

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,668

 1,920

 2,087

 2,064

 2,149

 2,400

 1,331

 2,377

 1,882

 2,048

 1,853

 2,016

 1,560

 1,870

 1,899

 1,959

 2,213

 1,758

 1,930

 1,786

 1,765

 1,726

 1,956

 2,250

 2,000

 1,844

 2,245

 2,358

 1,595

 987

 2,659

 60,155

 119,317

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDeflections of a Uniformly Loaded Circular Plate with Multiple Support PointsThis technical memorandum describes a method for determining the transverse deflections of a uniformly loaded, thin circular plate of constant thickness supported by single or multiple rings of equally spaced discreet points. The rotations are assumed free at each point. This could have application in the design of telescope mirror supports that must minimize structural gravitational deformations. It could also be of general use to the structural analyst.Document ID19990107327Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCraig, L. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Boulet, J. A. M.*(Tennessee Univ. Knoxville, TN United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1999Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberM-942NASA/TM-1999-209631NAS 1.15:209631Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990107327.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 502.04

 501.93

 501.78

 501.58

 501.36

 501.25

 501.64

 501.54

 501.38

 500.81

 500.68

 500.99

 500.27

 500.41

 500.53

 500.78

 500.92

 500.33

 500.42

 504.31

 505.07

 504.36

 503.36

 503.83

 503.07

 503.34

 502.91

 502.19

 501.32

 501.46

 501.56

 57,535

 57,413

 57,247

 57,027

 56,784

 56,663

 57,093

 56,983

 56,806

 56,181

 56,040

 56,376

 55,596

 55,747

 55,878

 56,149

 56,300

 55,661

 55,758

 60,109

 60,989

 60,167

 59,020

 59,556

 58,690

 58,998

 58,509

 57,703

 56,740

 56,894

 57,005

STORAGE

-190

-122

-166

-220

-243

-121

+430

-110

-177

-625

-141

+336

-780

+151

+131

+271

+151

-639

+97

+4,351

+880

-822

-1,147

+536

-866

+308

-489

-806

-963

+154

+111

CHANGE

130

163

139

110

96

161

423

151

124

445

790

1,103

539

1,010

1,007

1,075

1,011

618

986

3,139

1,492

1,054

886

1,673

944

1,462

1,092

921

844

1,408

1,313

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 113

 201

 211

 756

 825

 834

 928

 930

 937

 936

 933

 935

 937

 933

 1,040

 1,466

 1,460

 1,116

 1,373

 1,305

 1,336

 1,325

 1,325

 1,325

 1,253

POWER

 221

 220

 219

 218

 217

 216

 92

 0

 0

 0

 33

 97

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 286

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 5

 5

 4

 3

 2

 6

 1

 5

 2

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 2

 2

 5

 0

 12

 8

 2

 4

 1

 8

 2

 3

 2

 5

 5

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 04/01/2011

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -720 26,309 24,733 1,819 0 120

ACRE-FEET -720 52,184 49,058 3,608 0 238

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 49,058

SPILL 3,608 52,666

 57,725

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 14

 14

 15

 17

 17

 17

 21

 10

 21

 30

 713

 990

 438

 945

 944

 938

 934

 439

 731

 604

 293

 603

 522

 469

 111

 455

 461

 543

 542

 1,154

 1,144

 14,149

 28,065

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penford Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), Thomas D. Malkoski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven
O. Cordier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Thomas D. MalkoskiThomas D. MalkoskiChief Executive OfficerDated: April 8, 2005/s/ Steven O. CordierSteven O. CordierSenior Vice President and ChiefFinancial OfficerDated: April 8, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Penford Corporation and will be retained by Penford Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- Parsons Government Services, Inc. Under Contract Nos. F41624-03-D-8613 etal. APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ) ) ) ASBCA No. 60221 ) ) Kevin J. Slattum, Esq. James Matthew Carter, Esq.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Los Angeles, CA E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 21 December2017

hairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 60221, Appeal ofParsons Government Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals