alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            6205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       42
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6247
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    6247
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               88
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      6247
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14449
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1470
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   520
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  11687
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              11687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (922)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     10765
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   122.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   122.19
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,238.35

 2,238.90

 2,239.91

 2,240.86

 2,244.26

 2,249.77

 2,251.93

 2,253.36

 2,254.60

 2,257.71

 2,261.00

 2,263.60

 2,265.97

 2,268.12

 2,269.51

 2,270.64

 2,271.60

 2,272.42

 2,273.33

 2,274.95

 2,276.64

 2,277.83

 2,278.77

 2,279.60

 2,280.35

 2,281.04

 2,281.69

 2,282.29

 2,282.81

 2,283.32

 2,283.80

 858.4

 862.8

 870.9

 878.6

 906.6

 953.2

 971.9

 984.4

 995.4

 1,023.2

 1,053.2

 1,077.4

 1,099.8

 1,120.4

 1,133.9

 1,144.9

 1,154.3

 1,162.4

 1,171.5

 1,187.7

 1,204.9

 1,217.0

 1,226.7

 1,235.3

 1,243.1

 1,250.3

 1,257.2

 1,263.5

 1,269.0

 1,274.4

 1,279.5

STORAGE

+4.2

+4.4

+8.1

+7.7

+27.9

+46.6

+18.7

+12.5

+11.0

+27.8

+30.0

+24.2

+22.4

+20.6

+13.5

+11.0

+9.4

+8.1

+9.1

+16.2

+17.1

+12.2

+9.7

+8.6

+7.8

+7.2

+6.8

+6.3

+5.5

+5.4

+5.1

CHANGE

2,396

2,445

4,514

4,271

14,332

23,713

9,795

6,678

5,744

14,263

15,267

12,193

11,301

10,398

7,126

5,687

5,083

4,352

4,821

8,465

8,942

6,460

5,138

4,589

4,222

3,915

3,738

3,476

3,115

3,061

2,983

INFLOW

 297

 224

 402

 366

 234

 214

 348

 355

 204

 219

 126

 0

 0

 0

 315

 96

 294

 230

 217

 228

 293

 311

 235

 232

 238

 238

 242

 240

 338

 241

 361

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 5

 2

 14

 26

 15

 10

 13

 5

 18

 11

 8

 3

 17

 9

 17

 26

 29

 32

 41

 50

 12

 15

 24

 24

 49

 43

 50

 44

 0

 85

 41

C.F.S.

 .02

 .01

 .06

 .11

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .02

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .06

 .03

 .06

 .09

 .10

 .11

 .14

 .17

 .04

 .05

 .08

 .08

 .16

 .14

 .16

 .14

 .00

 .27

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .04

 .25

 .00

 .14

 1.13

 .76

 .00

 .59

 .65

 .35

 .37

 .72

 .76

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .32

 .41

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 5, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +425.1 222,483 7,338 0 0 738 2.53 6.61

ACRE-FEET +425,100 441,295 14,555 0 0 1,464

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 14,555

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 14,555

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.61

JULY 1, 2015 33.37

 854.3

Table 4

(1) (1)
### §1680u. Traditional health care practices

Although the Secretary may promote traditional health care practices, consistent with the Service standards for the provision of health care, health promotion, and disease prevention under this chapter, the United States is not liable for any provision of traditional health care practices pursuant to this chapter that results in damage, injury, or death to a patient. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to alter any liability or other obligation that the United States may otherwise have under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) 1 or this chapter.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §831, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 94–437, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1400, known as the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title and Tables.

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.), referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which was classified principally to subchapter II (§450 et seq.) of chapter 14 of this title prior to editorial reclassification as chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section 831 of Pub. L. 94–437 is based on section 199A of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §263. Prohibition of trade by President

The President is authorized, whenever in his opinion the public interest may require the same, to prohibit the introduction of goods, or of any particular article, into the country belonging to any Indian tribe, and to direct all licenses to trade with such tribe to be revoked, and all applications therefor to be rejected. No trader to any other tribe shall, so long as such prohibition may continue, trade with any Indians of or for the tribe against which such prohibition is issued.

(R.S. §2132.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2132 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 161, §3, 4 Stat. 729.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 230

 306

 258

 285

 259

 231

 265

 212

 206

 220

 209

 244

 218

 198

 202

 195

 194

 204

 193

 181

 180

 174

 172

 172

 167

 149

 136

 159

 164

 158

 164

 199

 209

 199

 211

 199

 204

 190

 194

 196

 197

 200

 200

 196

 164

 188

 166

 148

 150

 177

 157

 169

 146

 146

 134

 125

 121

 118

 134

 139

 135

 139

 209

 223

 218

 234

 234

 215

 209

 201

 200

 204

 203

 205

 204

 191

 196

 188

 176

 181

 184

 174

 175

 163

 161

 164

 148

 136

 125

 141

 145

 147

 152

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 26, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 148

 143

 137

 141

 141

 143

 147

 153

 156

 156

 153

 154

 157

 158

 162

 169

 166

 166

 169

 171

 171

 178

 181

 186

 182

 179

 180

 180

 184

 195

 136

 136

 132

 133

 138

 138

 141

 145

 147

 147

 148

 151

 152

 154

 156

 160

 162

 164

 165

 167

 167

 167

 173

 177

 177

 174

 174

 173

 172

 170

 139

 139

 135

 135

 139

 140

 143

 149

 151

 150

 151

 152

 154

 156

 159

 162

 164

 165

 166

 169

 168

 170

 176

 181

 180

 176

 176

 176

 178

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### §1253. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–253, §3, Mar. 17, 1972, 86 Stat. 64, which related to payments to minors and persons under a legal disability, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 654.417 Fire, safety, and first aid. ( a ) All buildings in which people sleep or eat must be constructed and maintained in accordance with applicable State or local fire and safety laws.
( b ) In family housing and housing units for less than 10 persons, of one story construction, two means of escape must be provided. One of the two required means of escape may be a readily accessible window with an openable space of not less than 24 × 24 inches.
( c ) All sleeping quarters intended for use by 10 or more persons, central dining facilities, and common assembly rooms must have at least two doors remotely separated so as to provide alternate means of escape to the outside or to an interior hall.
( d ) Sleeping quarters and common assembly rooms on the second story must have a stairway, and a permanent, affixed exterior ladder or a second stairway.
( e ) Sleeping and common assembly rooms located above the second story must comply with the State and local fire and building codes relative to multiple story dwellings.
( f ) Fire extinguishing equipment must be provided in a readily accessible place located not more than 100 feet from each housing unit. Such equipment must provide protection equal to a 21 ⁄ 2 gallon stored pressure or 5-gallon pump-type water extinguisher.
( g ) First aid facilities must be provided and readily accessible for use at all time. Such facilities must be equivalent to the 16 unit first aid kit recommended by the American Red Cross, and provided in a ratio of 1 per 50 persons.
( h ) No flammable or volatile liquids or materials must be stored in or adjacent to rooms used for living purposes, except for those needed for current household use.
( i ) Agricultural pesticides and toxic chemicals may not be stored in the housing area.
#### § 100.202 Will the Secretary verify the appraiser's qualifications?

The Secretary will verify the appraiser's qualifications to determine whether the appraiser meets the requirements of § 100.200.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank Carrano, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
### §315. Time for completion of road; forfeiture

If any such company shall fail to construct and put in operation one-tenth of its entire line in one year, or to complete its road within three years after the approval of its map of location by the Secretary of the Interior, the right of way granted shall be deemed forfeited and abandoned ipso facto as to that portion of the road not then constructed and in operation: Provided, That the Secretary may, when he deems proper, extend, for a period not exceeding two years, the time for the completion of any road for which right of way has been granted and a part of which shall have been built.

(Mar. 2, 1899, ch. 374, §4, 30 Stat. 991.)
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                        SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaydon Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian P. Campbell,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



September 4, 2003                     /s/Brian P. Campbell
                                      -------------------------------
                                      Brian P. Campbell
                                      Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                      Financial Officer
#### § 10000.2 Authority.

This part is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552 and section 301(g)(3)(A) of the Central Utah Project Completion Act (Public Law 102-575, 106 Stat. 4600, 4625, October 30, 1992).
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Artemio PENA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-1854.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Feb. 27, 2006.

Michelle L. Jacobs, Office of the United States Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Victor E. Plantinga, Rose *&*Dejong, Brookfield, WI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, and Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judges.

Artemio Pena challenged his 135-month sentence for conspiracy to distribute five or more kilograms of cocaine. This court ordered a limited remand under the terms set forth in *United States v. Paladino,*401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir.2005), for a determination whether the district court would have imposed the same sentence had it understood that the guidelines were advisory. *See United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

The district court has replied that it would have imposed the original sentence applying advisory guidelines. The parties were offered the opportunity to respond before we finally resolved the appeal, but only the government has responded.

Pena’s sentence is within the properly calculated guideline range and therefore presumptively reasonable. *See United States v. Mykytiuk,*415 F.3d 606, 608 (7th Cir.2005). We note that, although the district court invited written submissions from the parties and indicated that it had read these submissions, the court did not provide any analysis. The provision of reasons, however, is not a strict requirement when the sentence imposed is within the sentencing range recommended by the guidelines. *United States v. Dean,*414 F.3d 725, 730 (7th Cir.2005). The better practice, of course, is for the district court to provide some form of analysis, which provides us with a clearer basis for review. But, particularly in light of the fact that Pena has offered nothing to rebut the presumption of reasonableness that attaches to his accurately calculated sentence, to require a remand for the district court to provide explicit reasons here would be a fruitless exercise. We conclude that Pena’s sentence was not the result of plain error, and therefore AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Richard H. De Voto, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Resources
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004, (the Form 10-Q/A), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: October 25, 2004
    
    /s/ Richard H. De VotoRichard H. De VotoChief Executive Officer
### §1776f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–444, §8, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4640, which related to exchanges of land or minerals, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

728 KA 11-01163 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, PERADOTTO, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HARRY WILSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LEANNE LAPP, PUBLIC DEFENDER, CANANDAIGUA (MARY P. DAVISON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

R. MICHAEL TANTILLO, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, CANANDAIGUA (BRIAN D. DENNIS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (William F. Kocher, J.), rendered September 30, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the third degree and petit larceny (four counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and four counts of petit larceny (§ 155.25). Contrary to defendant’s contention, he was not denied a fair trial based on cumulative errors made by County Court. The court properly denied his request to charge trespass as a lesser included offense of burglary in the third degree inasmuch as “there was no reasonable view of the evidence, viewed most favorably to defendant, that he entered [the mall in question] without criminal intent and only subsequently formed an intent to steal” ( People v Zokari , 68 AD3d 578, lv denied 15 NY3d 758; see People v Smalls , 92 AD3d 420, 421; People v Mercado , 294 AD2d 805, 805, lv denied 98 NY2d 731).

Contrary to defendant’s further contention, the court properly admitted evidence concerning the barring notice issued to defendant prohibiting him from entering onto the mall property because it was relevant to establish that defendant knowingly entered the mall unlawfully ( see Penal Law § 140.20; see generally People v Alvino , 71 NY2d 233, 241-242). In addition, the court properly admitted evidence with respect to the circumstances surrounding the issuance of that barring order as necessary background and narrative information ( see generally People v Resek , 3 NY3d 385, 390). The probative value of that evidence exceeded its potential for prejudice ( see People v Comfort , 60 AD3d 1298, 1301, lv denied 12 NY3d 924). Defendant failed-2- 728 KA 11-01163

to request a limiting instruction concerning evidence of the barring order and thus did not preserve for our review his contention that the court should have issued such an instruction after that evidence was admitted ( see People v Moore [appeal No. 2], 78 AD3d 1658, 1659). In any event, the court issued such an instruction at the People’s request following the close of evidence and during the jury charge. We have considered the remaining instances of alleged cumulative error and conclude that they are without merit. The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Entered: June 8, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57945-57946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, NCI Review of Program Project Grant Application.
    Date: October 12, 2004.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: William D. Merritt, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Grants Review Branch, National Cancer Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8034, 
MSC 8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-9767.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer

[[Page 57946]]

Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 22, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy,
[FR Doc. 04-21712 Filed 9-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M