alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 839.61

 839.50

 839.37

 839.22

 839.12

 839.23

 838.85

 838.44

 838.04

 837.79

 837.72

 837.64

 837.53

 837.41

 837.25

 837.12

 836.93

 836.79

 836.62

 836.45

 836.33

 836.09

 835.93

 835.76

 835.58

 835.41

 835.25

 835.08

 834.94

 834.76

 834.64

 48.60

 48.46

 48.29

 48.10

 47.98

 48.11

 47.63

 47.12

 46.62

 46.31

 46.22

 46.12

 45.99

 45.84

 45.64

 45.48

 45.25

 45.08

 44.87

 44.67

 44.52

 44.23

 44.04

 43.83

 43.61

 43.41

 43.22

 43.02

 42.85

 42.64

 42.50

STORAGE

-0.20

-0.14

-0.17

-0.19

-0.13

+0.14

-0.48

-0.52

-0.50

-0.31

-0.09

-0.10

-0.14

-0.15

-0.20

-0.16

-0.23

-0.17

-0.21

-0.21

-0.15

-0.29

-0.19

-0.21

-0.22

-0.20

-0.19

-0.20

-0.17

-0.21

-0.14

CHANGE

46

76

58

49

83

208

72

56

66

167

280

274

270

263

241

257

217

250

234

235

264

198

239

234

227

236

240

229

252

231

266

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

SPILL

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 288

 288

 288

 288

 288

 288

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

 301

OUTLET

 18

 15

 11

 14

 16

 7

 1

 3

 5

 10

 11

 11

 13

 12

 14

 12

 8

 10

 12

 13

 12

 19

 10

 11

 10

 12

 11

 5

 10

 12

 12

C.F.S.

 .45

 .37

 .28

 .35

 .41

 .17

 .02

 .08

 .13

 .25

 .28

 .29

 .33

 .30

 .37

 .30

 .20

 .27

 .31

 .33

 .30

 .49

 .27

 .29

 .27

 .31

 .29

 .13

 .27

 .32

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 RUN DATE: 08/29/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -6.33 6,018 8,083 775 340 8.75 .23

ACRE-FEET -6,330 11,937 16,033 1,537 674

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,537

OUTLET

TOTAL

 16,033

 17,570

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .23

JULY 1, 2012 16.54

 48.80

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,346.76

 2,347.13

 2,347.48

 2,348.06

 2,348.71

 2,349.24

 2,349.73

 2,349.96

 2,350.11

 2,350.24

 2,350.40

 2,350.51

 2,350.60

 2,350.70

 2,350.76

 2,350.82

 2,350.85

 2,350.88

 2,350.88

 2,350.90

 2,350.96

 2,350.94

 2,350.96

 2,350.94

 2,350.93

 2,350.80

 2,350.68

 2,350.72

 2,350.66

 2,350.55

 2,085.5

 2,091.0

 2,096.2

 2,104.8

 2,114.5

 2,122.5

 2,129.8

 2,133.3

 2,135.6

 2,137.5

 2,139.9

 2,141.6

 2,142.9

 2,144.5

 2,145.4

 2,146.3

 2,146.7

 2,147.2

 2,147.2

 2,147.5

 2,148.4

 2,148.1

 2,148.4

 2,148.1

 2,147.9

 2,146.0

 2,144.1

 2,144.8

 2,143.8

 2,142.2

STORAGE

+8.0

+5.5

+5.2

+8.6

+9.7

+7.9

+7.4

+3.5

+2.3

+2.0

+2.4

+1.7

+1.4

+1.5

+0.9

+0.9

+0.5

+0.5

+0.0

+0.3

+0.9

-0.3

+0.3

-0.3

-0.2

-2.0

-1.8

+0.6

-0.9

-1.7

CHANGE

4,297

3,536

3,355

5,055

5,255

4,373

3,811

3,471

2,905

2,745

2,980

2,568

2,464

2,257

2,023

1,872

1,789

1,646

1,713

1,887

2,086

1,935

1,999

1,846

1,865

2,173

2,246

2,474

2,252

1,942

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 348

 351

 4

 1,681

 1,686

 1,682

 1,680

 1,674

 1,678

 1,395

 1,514

 1,349

 1,494

 1,351

 1,673

 1,646

 1,492

 1,680

 1,692

 1,874

 1,830

 3,077

 3,038

 2,050

 2,588

 2,685

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 244

 711

 643

 614

 5

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 314

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 13

 53

 83

 83

 0

 18

 97

 49

 80

 75

 84

 58

 102

 102

 53

 67

 67

 67

 40

 89

 138

 93

 155

 124

 111

 84

 120

 120

 120

 93

C.F.S.

 .03

 .12

 .19

 .19

 .00

 .04

 .22

 .11

 .18

 .17

 .19

 .13

 .23

 .23

 .12

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .09

 .20

 .31

 .21

 .35

 .28

 .25

 .19

 .27

 .27

 .27

 .21

INCHES

 .20

 .01

 .00

 .25

 .44

 .06

 .02

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2013 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 25, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +64.8 80,820 43,212 0 2,531 2,438 5.50 1.07

ACRE-FEET +64,800 160,306 85,711 0 5,020 4,836

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 85,711

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 5,020

 90,731

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.07

JULY 1, 2012 22.64

 2,077.4

Table 4

(1) (1)
#### TIEDEMAN, Appellant, v. RANNEY, Respondent.

(213 N. W. 2.)

(File No. 5888.

Opinion filed April 11, 1927.)

Dismissal and Nonsuit — Court Cannot Dismiss On Merits Without Notice, After Granting Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice.

Court cannot enter judgment dismissing action on merits -without notice to plaintiff, after granting latter’s motion to dismiss it without prejudice.

Note. — See, Headnote, American Key-Numbered Digest, Dismissal and nonsuit, Key-No. 79, 18 O. J. Sec. 131.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County; Hon. Robert D. Gardner, Judge.

Action by Ruth E. Tiedeman against Thomas P. Ranney. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiff appeals.

Judgment vacated' and cause remanded, with directions.

*Ed. L. Grantham*and *H. O. Hepperle,*both of Aberdeen, for Appellant.

*Corrigan & Walton*and *Van Slyke &*Agor, all of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

GATES-, J.

' This is an action for damages for malpractice against a physician and surgeon. During the course of the trial, plaintiff moved the court to dismiss the action without prejudice. Such motion was granted. Some two months later the trial court, without notice to plaintiff, entered a formal judgment dismissing *245the action upon its merits, based upon a recital therein that the court, while having granted the motion to dismiss, had reserved the question as to whether it should be with or without prejudice. Therefrom plaintiff appeals.

The record shows the following written motion and the written ruling of the court thereon:

“Now comes the plaintiff, Ruth E. Tiedeman, and moves the court to dismiss the above-entitled action without prejudice to the bringing of a new action upon the same cause of action.

“Ed. R. Grantham,

“H. O. Hepperle,

“Attorneys for plaintiff.

“The above and foregoing motion is hereby granted, and the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed without prejudice tO' the bringing of a new action upon the same cause of action.

“Done this 27th day of October, 1924.

‘‘By the Court: Robert D. Gardner, Judge.”

“State of South Dakota, County of Brown.

“Filed in my office, Oct. 27, 1924. N. E. Nelson, Clerk of Circuit Court, by C. G. Nelson, Deputy.”

The record also shows the following written minutes of the court:

October 27, 1924.

“Court opened as per recess.

“Ruth E. Tiedeman v. Thomas P. Ranney.

“Plaintiff presents motion for dismissal of case without prejudice. Motion allowed.”

It is therefore clearly apparent that the court was without authority to enter a judgment dismissing the action upon its merits.

The judgment appealed from is hereby vacated, and the cause is remanded, with directions to enter a judgment dismissing the action without prejudice to the 'bringing of another action.

CAMDBERR, P. J., and FODREY, SHERWOOD, and BURCH, JJ., concurring.
### §1679. Eligibility of California Indians

#### (a) In general

The following California Indians shall be eligible for health services provided by the Service:

(1) Any member of a federally recognized Indian tribe.

(2) Any descendant of an Indian who was residing in California on June 1, 1852, if such descendant—

(A) is a member of the Indian community served by a local program of the Service; and

(B) is regarded as an Indian by the community in which such descendant lives.

(3) Any Indian who holds trust interests in public domain, national forest, or reservation allotments in California.

(4) Any Indian of California who is listed on the plans for distribution of the assets of rancherias and reservations located within the State of California under the Act of August 18, 1958 (72 Stat. 619), and any descendant of such an Indian.

#### (b) Clarification

Nothing in this section may be construed as expanding the eligibility of California Indians for health services provided by the Service beyond the scope of eligibility for such health services that applied on May 1, 1986.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §809, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of August 18, 1958, referred to in subsec. (a)(4), is Pub. L. 85–671, Aug. 18, 1958, 72 Stat. 619, which is not classified to the Code.

#### Codification

Section 809 of Pub. L. 94–437 is based on section 192(3) of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1679, Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §809, formerly title VII, §709, as added Pub. L. 96–537, §8(b), Dec. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 3181; amended Pub. L. 100–713, title VII, §703, Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4827; renumbered title VIII, §809, Pub. L. 102–573, title VII, §701(a), (b), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4572, related to report to Congress containing sufficient data to determine eligibility of California Indians for health services provided by the Service and preliminary eligibility criteria, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935. The repeal is based on section 192(3) of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.
### §9230. Codification of sanctions with respect to North Korean activities undermining cybersecurity

#### (a) In general

United States sanctions with respect to activities of the Government of North Korea, persons acting for or on behalf of that Government, or persons located in North Korea that undermine cybersecurity provided for in Executive Order 13687 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to imposing additional sanctions with respect to North Korea) or Executive Order 13694 (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to blocking the property of certain persons engaging in significant malicious cyber-enabled activities), as such Executive Orders are in effect on the day before February 18, 2016, shall remain in effect until the date that is 30 days after the date on which the President submits to Congress a certification that the Government of North Korea, persons acting for or on behalf of that Government, and persons owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by that Government or persons acting for or on behalf of that Government, are no longer engaged in the illicit activities described in such Executive Orders, including actions in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1718 (2006), 1874 (2009), 2087 (2013), and 2094 (2013).

#### (b) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the President pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.).

(Pub. L. 114–122, title II, §210, Feb. 18, 2016, 130 Stat. 111.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is title II of Pub. L. 95–223, Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1626, which is classified generally to chapter 35 (§1701 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1701 of Title 50 and Tables.
Order entered March 5, 2021

In t he 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00962
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.W., C.W., AND C.W., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 304th Judicial Distri ct Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC
- 19
- 01219

O RDER Before the Court is the March 3, 2021 request of Martha Grant, Official Court Reporter for the 304th Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. Du e to working remotely, Ms. Grant states she was “just seeing” this Court’s February 2, 2021 email notifying her that the reporter’ s record

was past due and instructing her to file it within thirty days. She further states that she is unsure how long it wil l take her to complete the record and that “[a]ny time granted would be appreciated.” We GRANT the request and extend the time to March 25, 2021

.We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to add the following email and cell

phone number to Ms. Grant’s contact info rmation: marthagrant@att.net 903

- 746

- 3343. /s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
§ 2862.11 How does the BLM designate communications sites and establish communications site management plans? ( a ) The BLM may determine the location and boundaries of communications sites. When establishing a communications site, the BLM coordinates with other Federal agencies, State, local, and Tribal governments, and the public to identify resource-related issues, concerns, and needs.
( b ) When determining which lands may be suitable for communications sites, the BLM will consider all factors described in § 2802.11(b). Additional factors the BLM will consider include, but are not limited to, access to the site, existing infrastructure, signal coverage, available space, and industry demand.
( c ) The BLM may establish a communications site management plan to guide the development of communications uses at the site. The plans describe the types of communications uses that are permitted to operate at a communications site.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T35N

T34N

T33N

T32N

T31N

T30N

T29N

T28N

T27N

T26N

T25N

R114W R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

T36N

T

26

N

SU B LET TE

LIN CO L N

T

33

N

R107W

R10 6W

T

29

N

R114 W

T

28

N

R113 W

T

36

N

R111E R110E

T

37

N

T

34

N

R110 W

T

33

N

R111W

R 115W

T

27

N

Pinedale

T

34

N

R109W

T

33

N

R108W

R108W T

33

N

T

32

N

T

33

N

R10 7W

Cora

Daniel

T

28

N

R115W R114W R113W

T

26

N

T

25

N

T

27

N

R 114W

T

36

N

R111W R110 W

T

35

N

R10 7W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

APPROVED PINEDALE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Oil and Gas

Management Areas

Map 2-9

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Intensively Developed Fields

1/2 mile NSO Buffer

Traditional Leasing Areas

Unavailable Areas

Leased Federal Minerals
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James Doss, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
       September 14 , 2009
            /s/ James DossJames
      DossChief
      Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,309.87

 2,309.27

 2,308.68

 2,308.09

 2,307.49

 2,306.94

 2,306.39

 2,305.76

 2,305.15

 2,304.61

 2,304.07

 2,303.50

 2,303.04

 2,302.64

 2,302.16

 2,301.75

 2,301.34

 2,300.95

 2,300.54

 2,300.15

 2,299.69

 2,299.24

 2,298.78

 2,298.33

 2,297.89

 2,297.47

 2,296.96

 2,296.53

 2,296.10

 2,295.69

 2,295.26

 1,582.0

 1,574.5

 1,567.2

 1,559.9

 1,552.5

 1,545.8

 1,539.0

 1,531.4

 1,523.9

 1,517.4

 1,510.8

 1,504.0

 1,498.4

 1,493.6

 1,487.9

 1,483.0

 1,478.1

 1,473.5

 1,468.6

 1,464.0

 1,458.5

 1,453.2

 1,447.8

 1,442.5

 1,437.4

 1,432.5

 1,426.5

 1,421.5

 1,416.6

 1,411.8

 1,406.9

STORAGE

-8.4

-7.5

-7.3

-7.3

-7.4

-6.8

-6.7

-7.7

-7.4

-6.5

-6.5

-6.9

-5.5

-4.8

-5.8

-4.9

-4.9

-4.6

-4.9

-4.6

-5.4

-5.3

-5.4

-5.3

-5.2

-4.9

-5.9

-5.0

-5.0

-4.7

-5.0

CHANGE

-360

165

143

268

155

51

-35

42

172

615

-119

-233

144

193

205

139

184

301

212

120

-33

-20

-147

-24

99

38

65

162

143

177

131

INFLOW

 3,761

 3,780

 3,784

 3,784

 3,765

 3,347

 3,289

 3,812

 3,815

 3,835

 3,117

 3,125

 2,874

 2,502

 2,968

 2,535

 2,546

 2,539

 2,580

 2,323

 2,691

 2,531

 2,505

 2,554

 2,625

 2,486

 2,990

 2,552

 2,571

 2,458

 2,545

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 92

 142

 44

 160

 112

 112

 68

 108

 100

 82

 60

 106

 64

 109

 137

 74

 102

 105

 84

 129

 17

 125

 76

 83

 72

 21

 72

 123

 85

 105

 85

C.F.S.

 .25

 .39

 .12

 .44

 .31

 .31

 .19

 .30

 .28

 .23

 .17

 .30

 .18

 .31

 .39

 .21

 .29

 .30

 .24

 .37

 .05

 .36

 .22

 .24

 .21

 .06

 .21

 .36

 .25

 .31

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 11, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -183.5 2,953 92,589 0 0 2,854 8.10 .07

ACRE-FEET -183,500 5,857 183,650 0 0 5,661

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 183,650

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 183,650

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .07

JULY 1, 2013 .11

 1,590.3

Table 4

(1) (1)
**Exhibit 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of Michaels Stores, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the    “Company”), for the period ended April 29, 2006,    as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date    hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned    officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer’s    knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the    periods expressed in the Report. /s/  Jeffrey    N. Boyer    Jeffrey N. Boyer    President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 2623.4 Grant of mineral school sections effective upon restoration of land from reservation. ( a ) By the Act of January 25, 1927 (44 Stat. 1026; 43 U.S.C. 870, 871), which grants to the States certain school-section lands that are mineral in character, it is provided by subsection (c) of section 1 that where such lands are embraced within an existing reservation at the date of said Act of 1927, they are thereby excluded from the grant made by said act.
( b ) Under the amendatory Act of May 2, 1932 (47 Stat. 140; 43 U.S.C. 870), it is provided that in the event of the restoration of the lands from such reservation, the grant to the State of such mineral school-section lands will thereupon become effective.
( c ) Adjudications in connection with the State's title to school sections will be governed by the provisions of this amendatory Act of May 2, 1932.