alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Children’s Food Security and USDA Child Nutrition Programs

Economic Information Bulletin No. (EIB-174) 33 pp, June 2017

by Katherine  Ralston, Katie  Treen, Alisha  Coleman-Jensen, and Joanne  Guthrie

This report presents updated statistics on food insecurity among households with school-age children from the Food Security Supplement to the Current Population Survey for 2014 and 2015.  It summarizes recent research on the effects of child nutrition programs on children’s food security and diets and discusses recent developments in nutrition assistance for school-age children.

**Keywords:** Children, food security, food insecurity, child nutrition, school meals, National School Lunch Program, School Breakfast Program, Summer Food Service Program, Child and Adult Care Food Program

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Report summary 
-  Download Zip file for EIB-174 

-  Food & Nutrition Assistance 
-  Child Nutrition Programs 
-  Food & Nutrition Assistance Research 
-  Food Security in the U.S. 
-  Food Choices & Health 
-  Diet Quality & Nutrition 
-  Food Access 

-  Data Visualizations 
-  Food and Nutrition Assistance Research Reports Database 
-  Food Security in the United States 

**Last updated:** Tuesday, June 20, 2017

**For more information contact:**Katherine  Ralston, Katie  Treen, Alisha  Coleman-Jensen, and Joanne  Guthrie
### §100. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(48), 65 Stat. 703

Section, acts Mar. 3, 1877, ch. 101, §1, 19 Stat. 291; July 7, 1898, ch. 571, §1, 30 Stat. 676, related to transportation of Indian goods and supplies under contract or in open market.
SERVED: JANUARY 5, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC n n •.,.. , 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FLYING HIGH, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMSNO. FAA-2011-1292 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2011 WP070116) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

>nnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative LaW^Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMSNo. FAA-201 M29 2 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington. DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Sean Benjamin Cooke, Manager 

Flying High, LLC, Respondent' 

3309 E. Milky Way 

Gilbert, AZ 85295 

TEL: 480-252-0021 

FAX: 877-849-0021 

Adam Runkel, Complainant '.v Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacifie Region, AWP-7.12 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angelej;, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7142 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

OfHce of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000, Washington, 

be 20591; Anention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
Exhibit 13.1

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each undersigned officer of
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2012 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the
Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |        |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: 25 March 2013 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Carlos Brito       
|                    |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Carlos Brito           
|                    |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: 25 March 2013 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Felipe Dutra       
|                    |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Felipe Dutra           
|                    |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 149

 143

 146

 144

 142

 140

 144

 147

 144

 144

 145

 146

 148

 153

 151

 147

 145

 148

 152

 156

 152

 154

 150

 138

 153

 153

 147

 150

 160

 164

 161

 129

 131

 128

 128

 127

 127

 128

 133

 134

 136

 140

 142

 139

 139

 133

 129

 131

 134

 144

 145

 138

 132

 131

 114

 122

 146

 141

 145

 145

 147

 148

 136

 136

 136

 135

 133

 134

 136

 139

 139

 139

 143

 144

 143

 144

 141

 136

 137

 142

 146

 148

 145

 139

 139

 121

 134

 149

 145

 147

 150

 153

 153

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
§ 703.205 Filing of Agreement and Undertaking; deposit of security. Within 45 days of the date on which the insurance carrier receives the Branch's decision (or, if the carrier requests a hearing, a period set by the Longshore Director or the Longshore Director's representative) determining the extent of its unsecured LHWCA obligations and fixing the required security deposit amount (*see* § 703.204), the carrier must: ( a ) Execute and file with the Branch an Agreement and Undertaking, in a form prescribed and provided by OWCP, in which the carrier shall agree to— ( 1 ) Deposit with the Branch indemnity bonds or letters of credit in the amount fixed by the Office, or deposit negotiable securities under §§ 703.207 and 703.208 in that amount;
( 2 ) Authorize the Branch, at its discretion, to bring suit under any deposited indemnity bond or to draw upon any deposited letters of credit, as appropriate under the terms of the security instrument, or to collect the interest and principal as they become due on any deposited negotiable securities and to sell or otherwise liquidate such negotiable securities or any part thereof when— ( i ) The carrier defaults on any of its LHWCA obligations;
( ii ) The carrier fails to renew any deposited letter of credit or substitute a new letter of credit, indemnity bond or acceptable negotiable securities in its place;
( iii ) The carrier fails to renew any deposited negotiable securities at maturity or substitute a letter of credit, indemnity bond or acceptable negotiable securities in their place;
( iv ) State insolvency proceedings are initiated against the carrier; or
( v ) The carrier fails to comply with any of the terms of the Agreement and Undertaking; and
( 3 ) Authorize the Branch, at its discretion, to pay such ongoing claims of the carrier as it may find to be due and payable from the proceeds of the deposited security;
( b ) Give security in the amount fixed in the Office's decision: ( 1 ) In the form of an indemnity bond with sureties satisfactory to the Branch and in such form, and containing such provisions, as the Branch may prescribe: *Provided*, That only surety companies approved by the United States Treasury Department under the laws of the United States and the rules and regulations governing bonding companies may act as sureties on such indemnity bonds (*see* Department of Treasury's Circular-570), and that a surety company that is a corporate subsidiary of an insurance carrier may not act as surety on such carrier's indemnity bond;
( 2 ) In the form of letters of credit issued by a financial institution satisfactory to the Branch and upon which the Branch may draw; or
( 3 ) By a deposit of negotiable securities with a Federal Reserve Bank or the Treasurer of the United States in compliance with §§ 703.207 and 703.208.
### §141. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §2110, which related to issuance of army rations to Indians, was omitted on recommendation of Secretary of the Interior that this section be repealed because the practice of issuing army rations to Indians is no longer in use.
August 2022

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION** PRECIP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

663.7

1 2,211.57 661.9 -1.8 56 898 0 0 58 0.30 0.02

2 2,211.32 660.3 -1.7 138 956 0 0 16 0.08 0.02

3 2,211.12 659.0 -1.3 243 858 0 0 52 0.27 0.00

4 2,210.86 657.2 -1.7 101 912 0 0 52 0.27 0.00

5 2,210.60 655.5 -1.7 149 942 0 0 66 0.34 0.00

6 2,210.34 653.8 -1.7 81 871 0 0 69 0.36 0.00

7 2,210.06 652.0 -1.8 96 941 0 0 81 0.42 0.00

8 2,209.82 650.4 -1.6 67 810 0 0 46 0.24 0.00

9 2,209.49 648.3 -2.1 44 1,036 0 0 90 0.47 0.00

10 2,209.28 646.9 -1.4 91 719 0 0 61 0.32 0.00

11 2,209.02 645.2 -1.7 69 861 0 0 61 0.32 0.00

12 2,208.75 643.5 -1.7 76 899 0 0 57 0.30 0.00

13 2,208.43 641.4 -2.1 78 1,062 0 0 59 0.31 0.00

14 2,208.19 639.9 -1.6 120 839 0 0 63 0.33 0.00

15 2,207.93 638.2 -1.7 86 885 0 0 47 0.25 0.00

16 2,207.72 636.8 -1.3 204 829 0 0 55 0.29 0.00

17 2,207.53 635.6 -1.2 123 680 0 0 59 0.31 0.00

18 2,207.27 633.9 -1.7 95 757 0 127 53 0.28 0.00

19 2,206.91 631.6 -2.3 38 1,136 0 0 66 0.35 0.00

20 2,206.66 630.0 -1.6 141 892 0 0 53 0.28 0.00

21 2,206.37 628.2 -1.8 38 903 0 0 68 0.36 0.00

22 2,206.09 626.4 -1.8 101 936 0 0 66 0.35 0.00

23 2,205.79 624.5 -1.9 116 1,024 0 0 52 0.28 0.00

24 2,205.52 622.8 -1.7 138 945 0 0 56 0.30 0.00

25 2,205.18 620.6 -2.2 108 1,140 0 0 54 0.29 0.00

26 2,204.84 618.5 -2.1 23 1,047 0 0 59 0.32 0.00

27 2,204.39 615.7 -2.8 94 1,464 0 0 59 0.32 0.00

28 2,203.91 612.6 -3.0 75 1,525 0 0 72 0.39 0.00

29 2,203.47 609.9 -2.8 121 1,459 0 0 50 0.27 0.00

30 2,203.12 607.7 -2.2 138 1,183 0 0 59 0.32 0.00

31 2,202.76 605.4 -2.2 81 1,157 0 0 55 0.30 0.00

TOTALS -58.2 3,129 30,566 0 127 1,814 9.59 0.04

ACRE-FEET -58,200 6,206 60,628 0 252 3,598

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 ** Evaporation and precipitation records taken from station at Trinity River Hatchery.

Precipitation

This month = 0.04

October 01, 2021 To date = 18.86

SUMMARY 

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 60,628 Outlet 252

Spill 0

Total 60879.5655

Historical Archive and Report Database

Trinity Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/25/2023
#### Green Point Savings Bank, Respondent, v. 393 Stone Ave. Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.)

Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
§ 21.3 Definitions. ( a ) Public recreation area or recreation area means any land, title to which is in the United States and under the administration or jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior that is suitable for recreational purposes, including all such areas of the National Park System not excepted by § 21.2, Bureau of Reclamation Reservoir areas, and any other areas dedicated to or administered by the Department for public recreational use.
( b ) *Conservation area* means any land, title to which is in the United States and under the administration or jurisdiction of the Department of the Interior that is designated for fish, wildlife, or other conservation purposes, including all such areas of the National Wildlife Refuge Systems, National Fish Hatchery Systems, and any other such areas administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; also, land administered by the Bureau of Land Management and suitable for conservation or protection of fish or wildlife.
( c ) *Permit* means any lease, license, or other contract whereby a public recreation or conservation area is made available, in whole or part, to an individual or group for recreational purposes for a stipulated period of time, but does not include leases or transfers to other Federal or non-Federal public agencies.
( d ) *Cabin site* means any area within a public recreation or conservation area whose occupancy and use is granted to an individual or group for a period of time by permit.
( e ) *Substantial improvement* means any building, structure, or other relatively permanent facility or improvement affixed to a cabin site, utilized for human occupancy or related purposes, and costing or worth $1,000 or more. It does not include trailers or similar removable facilities.
( f ) *Investment* in a substantial improvement refers to the basic expenditure of moneys or property in kind in connection with a particular improvement. Thus, for example, where property is conveyed by testamentary or inter vivos gift, the donee will be seen only as occupying the position of the donor with respect to the time and amount of the investment since it was the donor who made the investment.
( g ) *Amortization* is the process whereby the investor in a substantial improvement derives sufficient use and/or economic benefit from the improvement over a period of time as to reasonably compensate for his investment.
( h ) *Trespasser* means any person who is occupying land in a public recreation or conservation area without a valid permit.
( i ) *Authorized Officer* means any person or persons designated by the head of any bureau or office of the Department with administrative jurisdiction over a particular conservation or recreation area, to make determinations and take other actions, consistent with the regulations in this part with respect to such area.
(No. 1089

Claimant awarded $300.00.)

#### Archie Brown, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 12,*1927.

Military *service*— when *award may he made.*Claimant a private in Co. I, 8th Inf., Illinois National Guard was injured, while obeying orders from his superior Batallion Commander, in riding a horse he was directed to bring to his commander: *Held.*That while the State is not liable for the injury sustained compensation may be awarded according to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Clarence B. Davis, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration filed by claimant alleges that on August 1, 1926, he was a regularly enlisted member of the military force of the State of Illinois, as a private in Company I, Eighth Infantry, Illinois National Guard, and was on duty on the first day of August, 1926, at Camp Grant, Illinois, in pursuance to orders from his company commander; that on said date, while in the discharge of his regular military duties, the plaintiff was commanded by his battalion commander, Major Robert A. Byrd, to go to a certain corral and then and there take possession of a certain horse and bring the horse to the quarters of said battalion commander; that plaintiff, in discharge of his orders and duties, proceeded to the corral and was then and there given a certain horse by the officer in charge, and that *367he mounted the horse, as he was ordered to do, and attempted to ride said horse to the quarters of said battalion commander; that the horse became frightened and fell to the ground while plaintiff was still on the back of the horse, and the horse in so falling fell upon plaintiff and broke his left leg; that many bones in plaintiff’s foot and leg were broken and he became ill, sore, lame and disabled and so remained for a long time, and that he is permanently incapacitated.

A demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois is sustained, as a matter of law.

It appears from the testimony that so far as the union of the bone is concerned, that the leg is healed. One physician testifies that there is a 60% disability in the use of the member. The respondent’s doctor stated that there was no permanent partial disability. Claimant is now employed by the State, as a janitor, and is receiving $100.00 per month. He is 53 years of age, and if he were compelled to go to work for an individual, he would be considerably handicapped on account of the injury sustained, and his earning power has been decreased by this disability.

While we do not concede any legal liability on the part of the State of Illinois, if he were employed under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, he would probably be allowed a reasonable sum, and, figuring a disability of 50% to the use of his left leg, he is entitled to receive, and we accordingly award to him, the sum of $300.00, figured according to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of the State of Illinois.
### §2003. Codification of regulations

#### (a) Part 32 of Title 25, Code of Federal Regulations

The provisions of part 32 of title 25, Code of Federal Regulations, as in effect on January 1, 1987, are incorporated into this Act and shall be treated as though such provisions are set forth in this subsection. Such provisions may be altered only by means of an Act of Congress. To the extent that such provisions of part 32 do not conform with this Act or any statutory provision of law enacted before November 1, 1978, the provisions of this Act and the provisions of such other statutory law shall govern.

#### (b) Definition of regulation

In this section, the term "regulation" means any rule, regulation, guideline, interpretation, order, or requirement of general applicability prescribed by any officer or employee of the executive branch.

(Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, §1123, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1042, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2019.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), means Pub. L. 95–561, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2143, known as the Education Amendments of 1978. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1978 Amendment note set out under section 6301 of Title 20, Education, and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2003, Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, §1123, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §381, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3985, related to the incorporation of regulations into, or the application of regulations to, Pub. L. 95–561, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 107–110.

Another prior section 2003, Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, §1123, Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2319; Pub. L. 100–297, title V, §5106, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 367, related to the incorporation of regulations into, or the application of regulations to, Pub. L. 95–561, prior to the general amendment of this chapter by Pub. L. 103–382.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 8, 2002, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 107–110, set out as a note under section 6301 of Title 20, Education.
### SUBCHAPTER LXVIII—BLACKFEET AND GROS VENTRE TRIBES: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,323.43

 2,323.42

 2,323.46

 2,323.43

 2,323.39

 2,323.32

 2,323.24

 2,323.15

 2,323.06

 2,322.99

 2,322.95

 2,322.95

 2,322.97

 2,322.82

 2,322.75

 2,322.91

 2,322.95

 2,322.91

 2,322.89

 2,322.98

 2,323.01

 2,323.03

 2,323.01

 2,322.99

 2,322.94

 2,323.00

 2,322.97

 2,322.93

 2,322.88

 2,322.84

 1,756.8

 1,756.6

 1,757.2

 1,756.8

 1,756.2

 1,755.3

 1,754.2

 1,753.0

 1,751.8

 1,750.9

 1,750.4

 1,750.4

 1,750.6

 1,748.6

 1,747.7

 1,749.8

 1,750.4

 1,749.8

 1,749.6

 1,750.8

 1,751.2

 1,751.4

 1,751.2

 1,750.9

 1,750.2

 1,751.0

 1,750.6

 1,750.1

 1,749.4

 1,748.9

STORAGE

-1.1

-0.1

+0.5

-0.4

-0.5

-0.9

-1.1

-1.2

-1.2

-0.9

-0.5

+0.0

+0.3

-2.0

-0.9

+2.1

+0.5

-0.5

-0.3

+1.2

+0.4

+0.3

-0.3

-0.3

-0.7

+0.8

-0.4

-0.5

-0.7

-0.5

CHANGE

46

594

881

460

494

309

183

134

110

206

389

844

1,203

760

830

1,612

964

438

547

1,266

873

815

519

512

314

1,114

470

376

308

411

INFLOW

 559

 661

 596

 662

 739

 775

 700

 711

 688

 656

 644

 836

 1,061

 1,763

 1,278

 538

 692

 694

 669

 659

 660

 668

 654

 630

 640

 705

 659

 624

 634

 662

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 24

 0

 16

 0

 24

 4

 20

 27

 27

 20

 12

 8

 8

 0

 20

 4

 4

 12

 12

 4

 12

 12

 0

 16

 8

 8

 12

 20

 8

 16

C.F.S.

 .06

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .06

 .01

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .05

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .05

 .02

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .24

 .25

 .45

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .06

 .01

 .00

 .44

 .00

 1.43

 .51

 .01

 .67

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .01

 .31

 .27

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .63

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -8.9 17,982 22,117 0 1 358 .90 5.54

ACRE-FEET -8,900 35,667 43,869 0 2 710

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 43,869

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2

 43,871

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.54

JULY 1, 2006 5.92

 1,757.8

Table 4

(1) (1)
#### Stanley A. Nelson & Company, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Modular Interiors *et al.,*Defendants-Appellants.

(No. 58350;

First District (3rd Division) —

July 19, 1973.

Ronald Butler, Robert G. Foster, and Paul H. Hensel, of Winston & Strawn, of Chicago, for appellants.

Theodore S. Pabst, of Pabst and Coakley, of Evergreen Park, for appellee.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE McGLOON.