alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Clarence K. McGuire, Respondent, *v.*Henry G. Weiss, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

First Department,

May 31, 1949.

*358
      *Maurice Fixel*of counsel *(Harold G.*Cooper, attorney), for appellant.

*William A. Herrmann*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

On a cause of action accruing in 1929, on which plaintiff did not bring suit until 1935, at which time defendant defaulted in appearance and pleading but plaintiff failed to enter judgment, plaintiff on December 20,1948, has procured an order directing that judgment be entered in twice the original sum sought by reason of the interest accruing during the long delay.

Defendant denied service and the only proof of any service was the proof of the signatures on the affidavit of the process server, who had died five years before the hearing, and of the notary who took the affidavit, who had died a dozen years before. By the extraordinary delay herein involved, twenty years from the claim and thirteen years from the default entitling entry of judgment at that time, defendant has been obviously prejudiced.

The failure to enter a default judgment for so many years is, as the Judicial Council has pointed out, a failure diligently to prosecute, and such excessive delay was prejudicial. Dilatory tactics such as here pursued should not be encouraged. The delay in this case is so excessive that the motion to enter the default judgment should be denied and the complaint dismissed *359for failure to prosecute (Thirteenth Annual Report of N. T. Judicial Council, 1947, pp. 216, 222; Rules Civ. Prac., rule 302).

The judgment and orders appealed from should be reversed and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted, with costs to the appellant.

Dobe, Van Vooehis and Shientag, JJ., concur; Glennon, J. P. and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Judgment and orders reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the motion to dismiss the complaint granted. Settle order on notice.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 3 to
Registration Statement No. 333-81255 of Lear Corporation on Form S-4 of our
report dated August 21, 1998 on the Seating Business, formerly of the Delphi
Interior Systems Division of Delphi Automotive Systems Corporation, appearing in
the Current Report of Lear Corporation on Form 8-K/A dated September 1, 1998,
and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17, 1998, and
to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in the Prospectus, which is
part of this Registration Statement.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Detroit, Michigan

November 5, 1999
### **CHAPTER 45—PROTECTION OF INDIANS AND CONSERVATION OF RESOURCES**

Sec.
5101.
Allotment of land on Indian reservations.
5102.
Existing periods of trust and restrictions on alienation extended.
5103.
Restoration of lands to tribal ownership.
5104.
Exchanges of land.
5105.
Title to lands.
5106.
Use of funds appropriated under section 5108.
5107.
Transfer and exchange of restricted Indian lands and shares of Indian tribes and corporations.
5108.
Acquisition of lands, water rights or surface rights; appropriation; title to lands; tax exemption.
5109.
Indian forestry units; rules and regulations.
5110.
New Indian reservations.
5111.
Allotments or holdings outside of reservations.
5112.
Indian corporations; appropriation for organizing.
5113.
Revolving fund; appropriation for loans.
5114.
Interest charges covered into revolving fund.
5115.
Vocational and trade schools; appropriation for tuition.
5116.
Standards for Indians appointed to Indian Office.
5117.
Indian preference laws applicable to Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service positions.
5118.
Application generally.
5119.
Application to Alaska.
5120.
Continuation of allowances.
5121.
Claims or suits of Indian tribes against United States; rights unimpaired.
5122.
Offsets of gratuities.
5123.
Organization of Indian tribes; constitution and bylaws and amendment thereof; special election.
5124.
Incorporation of Indian tribes; charter; ratification by election.
5125.
Acceptance optional.
5126.
Mandatory application of sections 5102 and 5124.
5127.
Procedure.
5128.
Application of laws and treaties.
5129.
Definitions.
5130.
Definitions.
5131.
Publication of list of recognized tribes.
5132.
Indians eligible for loans.
5133.
Revolving fund; loans; regulations.
5134.
Sale of land by individual Indian owners.
5135.
Mortgages and deeds of trust by individual Indian owners; removal from trust or restricted status; application to Secretary.
5136.
Loans to purchasers of highly fractioned land.
5137.
Removal of duplicative appraisals.
5138.
Title in trust to United States.
5139.
Tribal rights and privileges in connection with loans.
5140.
Mortgaged property governed by State law.
5141.
Interest rates and taxes.
5142.
Reduction of unpaid principal.
5143.
Authorization of appropriations.
5144.
Certification of rental proceeds.
### §1300k–5. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–324, §7, Sept. 21, 1994, 108 Stat. 2159, which required submission of membership rolls to the Secretary of the Interior not later than 18 months after Sept. 21, 1994, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,290.37

 2,290.06

 2,289.73

 2,289.43

 2,289.33

 2,289.17

 2,288.99

 2,288.80

 2,288.62

 2,288.48

 2,288.33

 2,288.20

 2,288.05

 2,287.91

 2,287.81

 2,287.68

 2,287.56

 2,287.45

 2,287.31

 2,287.17

 2,287.03

 2,286.87

 2,286.74

 2,286.62

 2,286.49

 2,286.37

 2,286.25

 2,286.08

 2,285.98

 2,285.89

 2,285.79

 1,351.4

 1,347.9

 1,344.3

 1,340.9

 1,339.8

 1,338.0

 1,336.0

 1,333.9

 1,331.9

 1,330.4

 1,328.7

 1,327.3

 1,325.6

 1,324.1

 1,323.0

 1,321.6

 1,320.3

 1,319.1

 1,317.5

 1,316.0

 1,314.5

 1,312.7

 1,311.3

 1,310.0

 1,308.6

 1,307.3

 1,306.0

 1,304.1

 1,303.0

 1,302.0

 1,301.0

STORAGE

-2.7

-3.5

-3.7

-3.3

-1.1

-1.8

-2.0

-2.1

-2.0

-1.5

-1.7

-1.4

-1.7

-1.5

-1.1

-1.4

-1.3

-1.2

-1.5

-1.5

-1.5

-1.7

-1.4

-1.3

-1.4

-1.3

-1.3

-1.9

-1.1

-1.0

-1.1

CHANGE

40

22

60

-40

89

-61

47

-180

2

-60

-24

96

89

188

270

8

82

44

26

45

-59

-151

-73

50

-55

-70

124

22

84

92

96

INFLOW

 1,358

 1,732

 1,883

 1,560

 624

 823

 1,039

 862

 965

 709

 811

 817

 866

 906

 749

 708

 664

 600

 768

 777

 676

 678

 602

 677

 614

 541

 751

 930

 606

 564

 612

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 36

 39

 29

 82

 26

 13

 16

 16

 39

 10

 0

 3

 58

 58

 74

 19

 81

 52

 32

 42

 39

 51

 39

 32

 45

 48

 32

 26

 26

 19

 29

C.F.S.

 .11

 .12

 .09

 .25

 .08

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .12

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .18

 .18

 .23

 .06

 .25

 .16

 .10

 .13

 .12

 .16

 .12

 .10

 .14

 .15

 .10

 .08

 .08

 .06

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2020 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -53.0 803 26,472 0 0 1,111 3.44 .10

ACRE-FEET -53,000 1,593 52,507 0 0 2,204

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 52,507

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 52,507

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .10

JULY 1, 2020 .93

 1,354.1

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = .10
§ 2091.3-2 Opening. ( a ) If a proposal or an application described in § 2091.3-1 of this part is not denied, modified, or otherwise terminated prior to the end of the segregative periods set out in § 2091.3-1 of this part, the segregative effect of the proposal or application automatically terminates upon the occurrence of either of the following events, whichever occurs first: ( 1 ) Issuance of a patent or other document of conveyance to the affected lands; or
( 2 ) The expiration of the applicable segregation period set out in § 2091.3-1 of this part.
( b ) If the proposal or application described in § 2091.3-1 of this part is denied, modified, or otherwise terminated prior to the end of the segregation periods, the lands shall be opened promptly by publication in the Federal Register of an opening order specifying the date and time of opening.
( c ) Subject to valid existing rights, non-Federal lands acquired through exchange by the United States shall be segregated automatically from appropriation under the public land laws and mineral laws for 90 days after acceptance of title by the United States, and the public land records shall be noted accordingly. Except to the extent otherwise provided by law, the lands shall be open to the operation of the public land laws and mineral laws at midnight 90 days after the day title was accepted unless otherwise segregated pursuant to part 2300 of this title. (See 43 CFR 2201.9(b))
[58 FR 60917, Nov. 18, 1993, as amended at 65 FR 70112, Nov. 21, 2000]
### §1731. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §12, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1796, which provided that this subchapter would constitute a general discharge and release of all obligations of the State of Maine arising from any treaty or agreement with any Indian tribe, except as expressly provided herein, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Russell H. Peck, Appellant, *v.*Charles B. Towns Hospital, Inc., et al., Respondents.

First Department,

May 31, 1949.

*303
      *Charles Kramer*of counsel *{Benjamin R. Siff*with him on the brief; *Saul Grover Wlodaver,*attorney), for appellant.

*William B. Shelton*of counsel *{E. F. W. Wildermuth,*attorney), for respondents.

*304
      *Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff made out a prima facie case by competent testimony to the effect that the defendant hospital failed to provide the usual and customary facilities for the sterilization of hypodermic needles, in that it did not furnish, for the use of its nurses, a closed appliance utilizing steam under pressure *(Volk*v. *City of New York,*284 N. Y. 279).

The plaintiff’s expert testified, or so the jury might have reasonably inferred from his testimony, that sterilization by boiling in water in open air was an inadequate and improper procedure because not all of the germs and spores were killed by that method; and, further, that the boiling method that was actually used was improper even as a boiling method, because such a method required retention of the instruments in boiling water for at least twenty minutes. The expert testified, moreover, that greater care in sterilizing was required in injecting drug addicts because their skin had a tendency to devitalization and hence was more subject to infection.

The plaintiff is entitled to the most favorable inference to be drawn from the testimony given in his behalf. The testimony of his expert, taken in connection with the fact that the plaintiff came to the hospital to obtain treatment advertised by it to cure drug addicts, was sufficient to put the defendant to its proof. It was error, therefore, to dismiss the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case. Judgment dismissing the complaint should be reversed and a new trial should be ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,361.45

 2,361.22

 2,360.99

 2,360.75

 2,360.50

 2,360.24

 2,359.98

 2,359.77

 2,359.59

 2,359.36

 2,359.14

 2,358.97

 2,358.75

 2,358.51

 2,358.28

 2,358.07

 2,357.86

 2,357.67

 2,357.46

 2,357.29

 2,357.10

 2,356.95

 2,356.72

 2,356.49

 2,356.36

 2,356.14

 2,355.90

 2,355.73

 2,355.47

 2,355.23

 2,355.03

 2,309.8

 2,306.2

 2,302.5

 2,298.8

 2,294.9

 2,290.8

 2,286.8

 2,283.5

 2,280.7

 2,277.1

 2,273.7

 2,271.0

 2,267.6

 2,263.9

 2,260.3

 2,257.1

 2,253.8

 2,250.9

 2,247.7

 2,245.0

 2,242.1

 2,239.8

 2,236.2

 2,232.7

 2,230.7

 2,227.3

 2,223.6

 2,221.0

 2,217.0

 2,213.3

 2,210.3

STORAGE

-4.4

-3.6

-3.6

-3.8

-3.9

-4.1

-4.1

-3.3

-2.8

-3.6

-3.4

-2.6

-3.4

-3.7

-3.6

-3.3

-3.2

-2.9

-3.2

-2.6

-2.9

-2.3

-3.5

-3.5

-2.0

-3.4

-3.7

-2.6

-4.0

-3.7

-3.1

CHANGE

596

760

787

975

789

695

632

676

724

752

797

822

654

384

354

464

567

572

560

441

554

533

252

291

473

319

284

353

105

151

529

INFLOW

 1,350

 1,350

 1,352

 1,353

 1,354

 1,353

 1,357

 1,355

 1,356

 1,306

 1,232

 1,300

 1,363

 1,363

 1,337

 1,190

 1,353

 1,361

 1,336

 1,370

 1,369

 1,365

 1,333

 1,372

 1,373

 1,373

 1,374

 1,375

 1,379

 1,514

 752

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,397

 1,068

 1,110

 1,376

 1,282

 1,290

 1,153

 841

 720

 1,113

 1,163

 712

 842

 719

 674

 811

 693

 641

 724

 281

 497

 203

 532

 601

 0

 491

 648

 167

 593

 318

 1,180

OUTLET

 69

 166

 148

 138

 124

 101

 170

 128

 60

 137

 128

 142

 169

 178

 141

 105

 159

 50

 136

 114

 168

 132

 172

 104

 109

 163

 122

 126

 144

 176

 144

C.F.S.

 .15

 .36

 .32

 .30

 .27

 .22

 .37

 .28

 .13

 .30

 .28

 .31

 .37

 .39

 .31

 .23

 .35

 .11

 .30

 .25

 .37

 .29

 .38

 .23

 .24

 .36

 .27

 .28

 .32

 .39

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2019 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 28, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -103.8 16,845 41,270 0 23,840 4,123 9.05 .00

ACRE-FEET -103,800 33,412 81,859 0 47,287 8,178

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 81,859

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 47,287

 129,146

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2019 .00

 2,314.2

Table 4

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 36.87
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Gary C. Huber, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Resources Corporation
(the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31,
2004, (the Form 10-Q/A), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: October 25, 2004
    
    /s/ Gary C. HuberGary C. HuberChief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 191

 185

 185

 184

 181

 178

 185

 186

 203

 189

 189

 183

 178

 175

 173

 175

 179

 176

 175

 203

 178

 175

 172

 170

 169

 171

 173

 184

 175

 173

 165

 167

 167

 165

 166

 168

 164

 166

 169

 167

 169

 162

 159

 160

 160

 158

 157

 151

 152

 150

 148

 147

 153

 153

 150

 152

 159

 159

 154

 154

 150

 151

 175

 174

 174

 173

 174

 171

 176

 176

 178

 178

 175

 169

 168

 167

 167

 164

 158

 160

 159

 162

 159

 162

 161

 159

 159

 163

 165

 167

 162

 160

 159

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 3, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
O’Keefe, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Blast
Energy Services, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Blast Energy Services, Inc.





Date:
April 7, 2008





By:
            /s/
      John O’KeefeJohn
      O’Keefe
              Chief
      Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 187

 180

 179

 175

 178

 175

 180

 188

 189

 193

 186

 194

 187

 177

 180

 182

 181

 177

 174

 175

 180

 182

 179

 177

 177

 175

 173

 182

 178

 179

 173

 165

 164

 163

 160

 161

 163

 164

 163

 159

 158

 158

 157

 151

 151

 159

 161

 160

 156

 159

 160

 160

 158

 156

 155

 158

 157

 156

 157

 157

 161

 158

 174

 170

 169

 166

 166

 169

 172

 175

 170

 167

 170

 171

 168

 163

 167

 170

 170

 167

 168

 166

 167

 169

 167

 166

 168

 167

 165

 168

 167

 167

 165

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER III—TRADERS WITH INDIANS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Eduardo RODRIGUEZ-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51231

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for D efendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Eduardo Rodriguez-Reyes raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 19

- 00263

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.E.G

. , a Child

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 00199

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 19, 2019

DIS MISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 240

 233

 220

 206

 211

 247

 234

 212

 218

 217

 209

 218

 202

 198

 174

 185

 204

 198

 191

 185

 189

 184

 176

 176

 178

 174

 178

 180

 178

 167

 184

 196

 190

 184

 180

 185

 183

 179

 178

 176

 171

 159

 165

 166

 159

 153

 155

 178

 153

 151

 148

 147

 151

 146

 152

 153

 152

 155

 159

 157

 155

 151

 221

 212

 199

 193

 197

 202

 202

 200

 198

 194

 186

 183

 180

 176

 161

 169

 191

 180

 171

 164

 163

 166

 160

 159

 161

 158

 165

 169

 166

 160

 165

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Energy Resources,
Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (“the “Report”), I, Al Rahmani, Interim Chief Executive Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      May 29, 2009
              /s/
      Al RahmaniAl
      RahmaniInterim
      Chief Executive Officer and
Director




This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not
be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.