alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,184.08

 2,184.03

 2,184.00

 2,183.97

 2,184.23

 2,184.62

 2,184.92

 2,185.14

 2,185.23

 2,185.37

 2,185.40

 2,185.59

 2,186.71

 2,187.50

 2,187.96

 2,188.61

 2,191.90

 2,194.87

 2,197.98

 2,200.03

 2,201.21

 2,203.46

 2,205.97

 2,207.48

 2,208.50

 2,209.15

 2,209.82

 2,210.69

 2,213.20

 2,215.17

 2,216.39

 496.7

 496.5

 496.3

 496.1

 497.6

 499.7

 501.3

 502.5

 503.0

 503.8

 504.0

 505.0

 511.2

 515.6

 518.2

 521.8

 540.4

 557.7

 576.2

 588.6

 595.8

 609.8

 625.6

 635.3

 641.9

 646.1

 650.4

 656.1

 672.8

 686.1

 694.5

STORAGE

-0.7

-0.3

-0.2

-0.2

+1.4

+2.1

+1.6

+1.2

+0.5

+0.8

+0.2

+1.0

+6.2

+4.4

+2.6

+3.6

+18.6

+17.2

+18.5

+12.4

+7.2

+14.0

+15.8

+9.7

+6.6

+4.2

+4.4

+5.7

+16.7

+13.3

+8.4

CHANGE

300

382

417

461

1,207

1,688

1,215

1,022

1,085

876

838

891

3,648

2,693

1,744

2,002

9,396

8,859

9,421

6,270

3,686

7,412

8,155

5,177

3,655

2,566

2,456

2,984

8,791

6,955

4,473

INFLOW

 658

 520

 476

 543

 475

 610

 388

 411

 829

 480

 750

 364

 527

 473

 453

 167

 0

 167

 100

 0

 0

 357

 172

 304

 336

 443

 254

 113

 383

 213

 227

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 28

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 0

 24

 0

 16

 2

 0

 2

 6

 8

 5

 0

 2

 7

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 4

 11

 4

 6

 6

 2

 4

 0

 4

 12

 18

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .00

 .10

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .06

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .06

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .63

 .34

 .23

 .00

 .31

 .06

 .02

 .05

 .88

 .19

 .79

 .68

 .67

 1.56

 .84

 .09

 .01

 .37

 .25

 .06

 .51

 .00

 .00

 .05

 1.83

 .47

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2016 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 18, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +196.9 110,725 11,193 0 28 143 .80 10.95

ACRE-FEET +196,900 219,623 22,201 0 56 284

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 22,201

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 56

 22,257

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 10.95

JULY 1, 2015 25.55

 497.4

Table 4

(1) (1)
§ 10010.17 Public involvement. ( a ) The public may be involved in the EA process when appropriate. Public notification will be made of the availability of an EA document (40 CFR 1506.6).
( b ) The scoping process may be applied to an EA (40 CFR 1501.7).
EXHIBIT 32.1 — CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andaccompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended September 30,2006 of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (the “Issuer”).The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and thatthe information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Issuer.Date: November 9, 2006      By:                      /s/ MARK P. MAYS  Name:  Mark P. Mays  Title:  Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuerand will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
### §396f. Lands excepted from leasing provisions

Sections 396a, 396b, 396c, and 396d of this title shall not apply to the Crow Reservation in Montana, the ceded lands of the Shoshone Reservation in Wyoming, the Osage Reservation in Oklahoma, nor to the coal and asphalt lands of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Tribes in Oklahoma.

(May 11, 1938, ch. 198, §6, 52 Stat. 348; May 27, 1955, ch. 106, §2, 69 Stat. 68.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1955—Act May 27, 1955, struck out "the Papago Indian Reservation in Arizona," after "shall not apply to".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Inconsistent Acts

For repeal of inconsistent acts, see section 7 of act May 11, 1938, set out as a note under section 396a of this title.

#### Papago Indian Reservation

Section 1 of act May 27, 1955, authorized the leasing of minerals for mining purposes. See note under section 5103 of this title.
### §1729. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §10, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1796; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095, which related to capital gains on transfers of land, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute 

controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance 

with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure.

NO. COA14-401

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS

Filed: 5 August 2014

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. Durham County

No. 04 CRS 50087

JERRY LAMONT DUNSTON

Appeal by defendant from order entered 9 January 2014 by 

Judge Michael J. O’Foghludha in Durham County Superior Court. 

Heard in the Court of Appeals 21 July 2014.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney 

General Joseph Finarelli, for the State. 

Winifred H. Dillon for defendant-appellant.

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge.

On 25 October 2011, Jerry Lamont Dunston (“defendant”) was 

convicted of second degree rape, second degree sex offense, 

communicating threats, felony possession of cocaine, and 

possession with intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver 

marijuana. The trial court sentenced defendant to a term of 

sixty to eighty-one months imprisonment. 
-2-

On 28 August 2013, the State notified defendant that it had 

determined that he had been convicted of an aggravated offense 

as defined by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.40(a)(1), which required 

defendant to enroll in the sex offender satellite-based 

monitoring (“SBM”) program. On 9 January 2014, the trial court 

entered an order requiring that defendant be enrolled in the SBM

program for the remainder of his natural life. Defendant 

appeals.

Defendant’s sole argument on appeal is that the retroactive 

application of SBM violates guarantees against ex post facto

laws contained in the federal and state constitutions. We are 

not persuaded.

The Supreme Court has held that “subjecting defendants to 

the SBM program does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clauses of 

the state or federal constitution.” State v. Bowditch, 364 N.C. 

335, 352, 700 S.E.2d 1, 13 (2010). We are bound by Bowditch.

See Cannon v. Miller, 313 N.C. 324, 327 S.E.2d 888 (1985) 

(holding that this Court has a “responsibility to follow” 

decisions issued by our Supreme Court). Accordingly, the trial 

court’s order is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges BRYANT and STROUD concur.
-3-

Report per Rule 30(e).
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137565) pertaining to the Amended and Restated 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation and 2006 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Plan of MCG Capital Corporation of our reports
dated March 5, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules of MCG Capital Corporation and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of MCG Capital Corporation, included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young LLP         
|McLean, Virginia March 5, 2009
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExcitation of Continuous and Discrete Modes in Incompressible Boundary LayersThis report documents the full details of the condensed journal article by Ashpis & Reshotko (JFM, 1990) entitled "The Vibrating Ribbon Problem Revisited." A revised formal solution of the vibrating ribbon problem of hydrodynamic stability is presented. The initial formulation of Gaster (JFM, 1965) is modified by application of the Briggs method and a careful treatment of the complex double Fourier transform inversions. Expressions are obtained in a natural way for the discrete spectrum as well as for the four branches of the continuous spectra. These correspond to discrete and branch-cut singularities in the complex wave-number plane. The solutions from the continuous spectra decay both upstream and downstream of the ribbon, with the decay in the upstream direction being much more rapid than that in the downstream direction. Comments and clarification of related prior work are made.Document ID19980232606Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAshpis, David E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Reshotko, Eli*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1998Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208490NASA/TM-1998-208490E-11271Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-31-23Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980232606.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 683.235 May Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act title I funds be spent for construction?

WIOA title I funds must not be spent on construction, purchase of facilities or buildings, or other capital expenditures for improvements to land or buildings, except with the prior written approval of the Secretary.
§ 2650.2 Application procedures for land selections. ( a ) Applications for land selections must be filed on forms approved by the Director, Bureau of Land Management. Applications must be filed in accordance with subpart 1821 of this chapter.
( b ) Each regional corporation shall submit with its initial application under this section a copy of the resolution authorizing the individual filing the application to do so.
( c ) Each village corporation under subpart 2651 of this chapter must submit with its initial application under this section a certificate of incorporation, evidence of approval of its articles of incorporation by the regional corporation for that region, and a copy of the authorization of the individual filing the application to do so.
( d ) ( 1 ) Regional and village corporations authorized by the act subsequently filing additional or amendatory applications need only refer to the serial number of the initial filing.
( 2 ) Any change of the officer authorized to act for any corporation in the matter of land selections should be promptly submitted to the appropriate office of the Bureau of Land Management.
( e ) ( 1 ) If the lands applied for are surveyed, the legal description of the lands in accordance with the official plats of survey shall be used.
( 2 ) If the lands applied for are unsurveyed, they shall be described by protraction diagrams.
( 3 ) If the lands applied for are not surveyed and are not covered by protraction diagrams, they must be described by metes and bounds commencing at a readily identifiable topographic feature, such as a mountain peak, mouth of a stream, etc., or a monumented point of known position, such as a triangulation station, and the description must be accompanied by a topographic map delineating the boundary of the area applied for.
( 4 ) Where 1:63,360 U.S.G.S. quadrangle maps with the protraction diagram plotted thereon have been published, these maps shall be used to portray and describe the lands applied for. Where 1:63,360 U.S.G.S. quadrangle maps with the protraction diagram plotted thereon have not been published, then the 1:250,000 U.S.G.S. quadrangle maps with the protraction diagrams plotted thereon shall be used.
( 5 ) If the written description shown on the application and the map portrayal accompanying the application do not agree the delineation shown on the map shall be controlling.
( f ) The selected areas may be adjusted by the Secretary with the consent of the applicant and amendment of the application by the applicant, provided that the adjustment will not create an excess over the selection entitlement.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 473.50

 474.20

 474.38

 474.38

 474.38

 474.38

 474.38

 474.36

 474.36

 474.36

 474.35

 474.35

 474.34

 474.34

 474.33

 474.09

 473.76

 473.44

 473.09

 472.73

 472.38

 472.33

 472.30

 472.80

 473.11

 473.43

 473.72

 474.15

 1,214,232

 1,221,702

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,626

 1,223,412

 1,223,412

 1,223,412

 1,223,305

 1,223,305

 1,223,198

 1,223,198

 1,223,091

 1,220,527

 1,217,005

 1,213,592

 1,209,863

 1,206,031

 1,202,309

 1,201,778

 1,201,459

 1,206,776

 1,210,076

 1,213,485

 1,216,578

 1,221,168

STORAGE

+2,452

+7,470

+1,924

+0

+0

+0

+0

-214

+0

+0

-107

+0

-107

+0

-107

-2,564

-3,522

-3,413

-3,729

-3,832

-3,722

-531

-319

+5,317

+3,300

+3,409

+3,093

+4,590

CHANGE

1,934

3,815

945

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

650

3,006

1,940

1,939

1,930

2,635

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,283

 1,810

 1,804

 1,794

 1,785

 1,775

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 34

 13

 10

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 1

 1

 11

 114

 151

 156

 163

 174

 188

 183

 188

 140

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-664

-36

+35

+1

+1

+1

+1

-107

+1

+1

-53

+1

-53

+1

-51

-9

+35

+85

-75

-32

+49

-111

-647

-151

-89

-38

-183

-181

OR

 24

 17

 0

 0

 59

 35

 35

 38

 21

 52

 42

 31

 35

 35

 31

 35

 52

 41

 52

 31

 34

 52

 41

 52

 59

 69

 59

 59

C.F.S.

 .07

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .10

 .10

 .11

 .06

 .15

 .12

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .09

 .10

 .15

 .12

 .15

 .09

 .10

 .15

 .12

 .15

 .17

 .20

 .17

 .17

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR March 13, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2013 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +9,388 18,794 10,251 1,542 0 -2,268 1,091 3.15 .16

ACRE-FEET +9,388 37,278 20,333 3,059 0 -4,499 2,164

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 20,333

PACHECO TUNNEL 3,059 TOTAL 23,392

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE = 5.58

 1,211,780

SPILL 0 .16

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaydon Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian P.
Campbell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. May 11, 2004
    
    /s/ Brian P. CampbellBrian P. CampbellChief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
### §1193. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–259, §3, May 21, 1970, 84 Stat. 254, which provided that judgment funds would remain tribal funds until distributed, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §2219. Application to Alaska

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) numerous academic and governmental organizations have studied the nature and extent of fractionated ownership of Indian land outside of Alaska and have proposed solutions to this problem; and

(2) despite these studies, there has not been a comparable effort to analyze the problem, if any, of fractionated ownership in Alaska.

#### (b) Application of chapter to Alaska

Except as provided in this section, this chapter shall not apply to land located within Alaska.

#### (c) Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to constitute a ratification of any determination by any agency, instrumentality, or court of the United States that may support the assertion of tribal jurisdiction over allotment lands or interests in such land in Alaska.

(Pub. L. 97–459, title II, §220, as added Pub. L. 106–462, title I, §103(6), Nov. 7, 2000, 114 Stat. 2006.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "this Act", which was translated as reading "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 97–459, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:** Annual report of the CFPB student loanombudsman

2012;2013;2014;2015;2016

SuDoc:
Item Number:
CGP system Number:
# Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01

- 12

- 00229

- CV

Jonathan Levine and Samantha Levine

v

.

Steve Scharn Custom Homes, Inc., Steve Scharn, and NewFirst National Bank

NO. 08DCV162201 IN THE 268TH DISTRICT COURT OF FORT BEND C OUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

E

- TXGOV FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
MT FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
SUPP CLK RECORD
MT FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
MT FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
MT FEE
MT FEE
MT FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $200.00 $10.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 $5.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $5.00 09/26/2013
09/25/2013
09/12/2013
09/12/2013
06/28/2013
05/10/2013
05/06/2013
05/02/2013
05/02/2013
05/02/2013
04/12/2013
04/12/2013
03/21/2013
03/21/2013
03/20/2013
03/20/2013
01/22/2013
01/22/2013
01/22/2013 E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID

PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID APE
APE
APE
APE
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
APE
APE
APE
APE
APE
APE
APE
APE
APEE

- TXGO V FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
MT FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
MT FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
MT FEE
E

- TXGOV FEE
RPT RECORD
CLK RECORD
FILING $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 $5.00 $10.0 0 $5.00 $10.00 $5.00
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN

$175.00 01/22/ 2013
12/28/2012
10/26/2012
10/26/2012
10/02/2012
10/02/2012
09/24/2012
09/24/2012
08/29/2012
05/18/2012
03/14/2012 E

- PAID
E

- P AID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID
E

- PAID

PAID
PAID
E

- PAID APE
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT
ANT



### The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are $550.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine , Clerk o f the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this ca se.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, this September 2 5 , 2015

.