alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  DAKOTA  DISTRIBUTION,  INC.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2001, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Kevin Ericksteen,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: October 31, 2003                                Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Gary C. Huber, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Resources Corporation
(the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2004, (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: October 25, 2004
    /s/ Gary C. HuberGary C. HuberChief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 720.07

 720.18

 720.22

 720.20

 720.12

 720.13

 721.70

 723.08

 724.32

 725.41

 726.46

 720.17

 721.95

 723.44

 724.72

 720.05

 720.11

 721.29

 720.38

 721.42

 722.39

 723.27

 724.09

 724.87

 725.60

 726.30

 726.98

 720.23

 721.02

 721.76

 722.46

 1,189

 1,192

 1,194

 1,193

 1,190

 1,191

 1,248

 1,299

 1,346

 1,389

 1,430

 1,192

 1,257

 1,313

 1,362

 1,188

 1,190

 1,233

 1,200

 1,238

 1,273

 1,306

 1,338

 1,368

 1,396

 1,424

 1,451

 1,194

 1,223

 1,250

 1,276

STORAGE

+0

+3

+2

-1

-3

+1

+57

+51

+47

+43

+41

-238

+65

+56

+49

-174

+2

+43

-33

+38

+35

+33

+32

+30

+28

+28

+27

-257

+29

+27

+26

CHANGE

53

44

36

30

29

29

31

28

26

24

23

5

35

30

28

9

21

25

17

22

21

20

19

18

17

17

17

-2

18

17

16

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 53

 42

 35

 31

 31

 28

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 125

 2

 2

 3

 97

 20

 3

 34

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 128

 3

 3

 3

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2011 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2011

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +87 723 0 677

ACRE-FEET +87 1,434 0 1,343

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,343

 1,343

 1,189

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
EXHIBIT I

Assertion of Management of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (a wholly -owned subsidiary of Prudential Mortuage Capital Company, LLC


April 12, 2002


As of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended, Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. and its affiliate sub-servicers (the "Servicer") have complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in its minimum servicing policy (see Schedule A), which were derived from the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP"), relating to mortgage loans held by LaSalle Bank N.A., as Trustee for ROCK Commercial Mortgage Trust 2001-Cl.

As of and for this same period, Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy each in the amount of $35,000,000.
Prudential Mortgage Capital Company 100 Mulberry Street, Gateway Center 4 Newark, NY NYNYNewJersey 07102
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          79,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,009
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,603,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,240
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,922
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,588,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,603,590
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,656
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,701
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,379)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.001)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.001)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         453,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,619
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               468,801
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 988,148
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,286,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,994,627)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   988,148
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,596
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,957
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,252
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (118,613)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (118,613)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (118,613)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §1778. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–568, title VI, §602, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2906, which set out congressional findings and purpose, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–568, title VI, §601, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2906, provided that title VI of Pub. L. 106–568, enacting this subchapter and provisions formerly set out as a note under this section, could be cited as the "Torres-Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians Claims Settlement Act".
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                         100,302
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,975
<INVENTORY>                                     69,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,850
<PP&E>                                         224,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 418,286
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           72,767
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,648
<OTHER-SE>                                     310,551
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   418,286
<SALES>                                         88,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,120
<CGS>                                           53,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (1,050)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,124
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
### §225c. Congressional review of system implementation plan

(a) The Committee on the District of Columbia of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate shall review the preliminary system implementation plan transmitted by the Mayor pursuant to section 225b of this title to determine the extent of its compliance with the provisions of section 225(b) of this title and section 225b of this title, and transmit written recommendations regarding any revisions to the preliminary plan to the Mayor not later than 60 days after receipt of such plan.

(b) The Committee on the District of Columbia of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Labor and Human Resources and the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate shall, within 90 days of submission of the final system implementation plan by the Mayor pursuant to section 225b of this title, review such plan to determine the extent to which it is in compliance with the provisions of section 225(b) of this title and section 225b of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–621, §5, Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3374.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Governmental Affairs of Senate changed to Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of Senate, effective Jan. 4, 2005, by Senate Resolution No. 445, One Hundred Eighth Congress, Oct. 9, 2004.

Committee on Labor and Human Resources of Senate changed to Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of Senate by Senate Resolution No. 20, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 19, 1999.

#### Abolition of House Committee on the District of Columbia

Committee on the District of Columbia of House of Representatives abolished by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Fourth Congress, Jan. 4, 1995. References to Committee on the District of Columbia treated as referring to Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of House of Representatives, see section 1(b) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress. Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Government Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Sixth Congress, Jan. 6, 1999. Committee on Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Tenth Congress, Jan. 5, 2007. Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 6, One Hundred Sixteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2019. Committee on Oversight and Reform of House of Representatives changed to Committee on Oversight and Accountability of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Eighteenth Congress, Jan. 9, 2023.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 


 


This Amendment, dated
as of November 14, 2018 (the “Amendment”), to the Employment Agreement, dated June 19, 2017 (the “Agreement”),
is entered into between Douglas Krafte, Ph.D. (“Executive”) and Icagen, Inc. (“Corporation”).


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, Executive was retained under
the Employment Agreement by the Corporation to serve as its Chief Scientific Officer; and


 


WHEREAS, in recognition of the hard
work and performance by Executive, the Corporation desires to amend the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for the mutual promises
contained herein and for ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is
hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1. Amendment.
Sections 3(a)(i) and 3(a)(ii) are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following:


 


(i) Base
Salary. Executive shall receive an annual base salary of Two Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand Dollars ($295,000) for the Term (the
“Base Salary”), payable semi-monthly subject to annual increases following customary policies of the Company.


 


(ii) Bonus.
The Executive shall be eligible for an annual discretionary bonus of up to fifty percent (50%) of his base salary payable in cash.
Any bonus awarded will be in the sole and absolute discretion of both the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors of
the Corporation. The amount of any such bonus shall depend on the achievement by the Executive and/or the Corporation of certain
objectives to be established by the Chief Executive Officer in consultation with the Executive, along with such other factors the
Board and Compensation Committee deems relevant. Any such bonus for a given fiscal year shall be payable in one lump sum upon approval
by the Board of Directors of the Corporation or the Compensation Committee, which shall be obtained at the same time as the bonuses
paid to other Executive Officers.


 


2. Severability.
If any of the provisions of this Amendment are held to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will
nevertheless continue to be valid and enforceable


 


3. No
Other Amendments; Confirmation. All other terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The Agreement,
as amended by this Amendment, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter thereof.





 


4. Counterparts.
 This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but both of which
together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


5. Governing
Law. This Amendment is made and shall be construed and performed under the laws of the remaining provisions will
nevertheless continue to be valid and enforceable. State of North Carolina without regard to its choice or conflict of law
principles and the parties agree to North Carolina as the exclusive venue for any disputes arising hereunder.


 


	ICAGEN, INC.	 	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Mark Korb	 	/s/ Douglas Krafte
	Name:	Mark Korb	 	DOUGLAS KRAFTE
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer
MEMORANDUM

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meetings

From: Martha Keating

To: Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2008

- 0699

Date: January 29 , 2015

On January 29 , 2015

, Karen Wesson of the Health and Environmental Impacts Division,

Ambient Standards Group, presented an overview, by teleconference, of the Agency’s November

25 , 2015 , proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone to the

Central S tates Air Resource Agencies (Cen SARA).

The presentation used in the teleconference is available here:

http://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/2014decwebinar.pdf

The following is a list of attendees on the teleconference.

C enSARA Region Advance Program Organizations

January 29, 2015 Conference Call

Org Contact

Organization

1. Louisiana

2. Wes Wyche, Env. Services Mgr. City of Shreveport

3. Leo Marretta South Central Planning & Development

Commission

4. Missouri and Kansas

5. Ashley Jurgensmeyer Missouri Dept. of Natural Resources

6. Kathleen Waters, Environmental Scientist Kansas Dept. of Health and Env.

7. David Grimes, Dep. Dir. Southeast Missouri Regional Planning

Commission

8. Shawn Maloney, Interim Environmental

Health Manager City of Wichita, Kansas

9. Laura Quick City of Wichita, Kansas

10. Tonya Bronleewe City of Wichita, Kansas11. Nebraska and Iowa

12. Matthew Johnson Iowa Dept. of Natural Resources

13. Dan May, Omaha Air Quality Control Omaha Metro Area

14. Oklahoma

15. Scott Thomas ODEQ

16. Nancy Marshment ODEQ

17. Texas

18. Shana Norton Capital Area MPO

19. Fred Blood Capital Area Council of Governments

(CAPCOG)

20. Pharr Andrews/Cari Buetow City of Austin

21. Adele Noel Travis County, Trans. & Nat. Res. Dept.

22. Jim Mathews Northeast East Clean Air Coalition

23. Others

24. Karen Wesson EPA OAQPS

25. Theresa Pella CenSARA
1 of 1

EPA’s Potential Reinterpretation of the Clean Water Act TAS Provision–Meeting with the 

National Tribal Water Council (NTWC)

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

2:00 – 3:30 p.m. EDT

Meeting Summary

EPA Moderator: Felicia Wright, EPA Office of Water Tribal Coordinator

EPA Presenter: Fred Leutner, EPA Office of Science and Technology

Participants: Approximately 10 tribal members of the Council

The potential reinterpretation of the tribal authority provision of the Clean Water Act was one of 

several on the agenda. Two documents that were provided to invitees in advance of the meeting 

are available in the docket for this rulemaking:

 Clean Water Act Tribal Provision: Overview, prepared by the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency Office of Water and Office of General Counsel, May 2015.

 Clean Water Act Tribal Provision: Discussion Paper, prepared by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water and Office of General Counsel, May 

2015.

Fred Leutner provided a brief overview of the potential action. 

Several participants expressed their support for the action. Participants raised no questions or 

issues.
#### Bernard Schorr, Respondent, *v.*Frank Weisfeld and Others, etc., Appellants.

*Appeal —practice.*

Motion to dismiss appeal.

Per Curiam:

On October 4, 1910, this court adopted a special rule to the effect that a party desiring to oppose a motion to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution, “in addition to affidavits stating facts excusing the delay, *900must also submit affidavits stating concisely the facts out of which the controversy arose and the questions of law and fact involved in the said appeal, and showing that the appeal is a meritorious one.” Although this rule has been printed as a part of every calendar of this court issued since that date, until very recently, when it was printed and published with all other rules relating to appeals in a separate pamphlet, it is frequently disregarded. When this motion was originally submitted the appellants made not the slightest attempt to comply with the same. By direction of the court the clerk called the attention of counsel to the rule and gave him an opportunity to submit additional affidavits. In response thereto he has submitted an affidavit in which he states that in his opinion “ error was committed by the learned trial justice in the exclusion of evidence offered by defendant, and in the charge to the jury.” The affidavit contains no facts from which the court can determine what questions, either of law or fact, are involved, or whether the appeal is a meritorious one. Failure to comply with the rule after counsel’s attention has been specially called to the same warrants but one conclusion, which is that the appeal is without merit. The motion to dismiss is, therefore, granted, with costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with costs.
### §1014. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–464, §4, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 563, which provided for costs incurred by the Secretary of the Interior in the preparation of the membership rolls and in the payment of pro rata shares to be paid by appropriate withdrawals from the judgment fund, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.