alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of Solar Array Shadowing on the Power Capability of the Interim Control ModuleThe Interim Control Module (ICM) is being built by the US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) for NASA as a propulsion module for the International Space Station (ISS). Originally developed as a spinning spacecraft used to move payloads to their final orbit, for ISS, the ICM will be in a fixed orientation and location for long periods resulting in substantial solar panel shadowing. This paper describes the methods used to determine the incident energy incident energy on the ICM solar panels and the power capability of the electric power system (EPS). Applying this methodology has resulted in analyses and assessments used to identify ICM early design changes/options, placement and orientations that enable successful operation of the EPS under a wide variety of anticipated conditions.Document ID19990063832Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsFincannon, James*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Hojnicki, Jeffrey S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Garner, James Christopher*(Naval Research Lab. Washington, DC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1999Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209378E-11792SAE-99-01-2432NASA/TM-1999-209378Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion EngineeringLocation: Vancouver, British ColumbiaCountry: CanadaStart Date: August 1, 1999End Date: August 5, 1999Sponsors:Society of Automotive EngineersFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 575-15-69Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990063832.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §295. Supervision of expenditure of appropriations for school purposes

All expenditure of money herein or after April 30, 1908, appropriated for school purposes among the Indians, shall be at all times under the supervision and direction of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, and in all respects in conformity with such conditions, rules, and regulations as to the conduct and methods of instruction and expenditure of money as may be from time to time prescribed by him, subject to the supervision of the Secretary of the Interior.

(Apr. 30, 1908, ch. 153, 35 Stat. 72.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Act Apr. 30, 1908, embodied restrictions as to the amount which might be expended for the annual support and education of any one pupil and specified the method for determining the number of pupils in any school entitled to the per capita allowance provided for by the act.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### School and Employment Transportation

Separate appropriations for collection and transportation of pupils to and from Indian schools, etc., with a proviso that a specified part of the amount so appropriated may be used in placing Indian youths in employment in industrial pursuits were made by the following appropriation acts:

Mar. 3, 1925, ch. 462, 43 Stat. 1155.

May 24, 1922, ch. 199, 42 Stat. 562.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL B. SPARLIN; SHARON J.

SPARLIN,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS

INCORPORATED; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 11-17259

D.C. No. 4:11-cv-00371-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 19, 2013** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges. 

Michael B. and Sharon J. Sparlin appeal pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing their action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal based on

FILED

DEC 10 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
preclusion principles. Wolfson v. Brammer, 616 F.3d 1045, 1064 (9th Cir. 2010)

(collateral estoppel); Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp, 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir. 2002)

(res judicata). We may affirm on any ground supported by the record, Thompson

v. Paul, 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

Dismissal of the Sparlins’ action as barred by the doctrines of collateral

estoppel and res judicata was proper because the Sparlins had a full and fair

opportunity to litigate the issues and claims arising out of the foreclosure

proceedings at issue in their prior action against nearly identical defendants, and

that action was dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim. See Wolfson,

616 F.3d at 1064 (discussing elements of collateral estoppel); Stewart, 297 F.3d at

956-57 (discussing elements of res judicata, and noting that “dismissal for failure

to state a claim” constitutes a final judgment on the merits to which res judicata

applies).

The Sparlins’ contentions regarding the denial of discovery and alleged

violations of their civil rights are unpersuasive.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009)

(per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

2 11-17259
§ 664.830 How are performance measures for Youth Opportunity Grants determined? ( a ) The Secretary negotiates performance measures, including appropriate performance levels for each indicator, with each selected grantee, based on information contained in the application.
( b ) Performance indicators for the measures negotiated under Youth Opportunity Grants are the indicators of performance provided in WIA sections 136(b)(2)(A) and (B). (WIA sec. 169(f).).
§ 2521.1 Who may make desert-land entry. ( a ) *Citizenship.* ( 1 ) Any citizen of the United States 21 years of age, or any person of that age who has declared his intention of becoming a citizen of the United States, and who can truthfully make the statements specified in §§ 2520.0-8(c) and 2521.2(a) can make a desert-land entry. Thus, a woman, whether married or single, who possesses the necessary qualifications, can make a desert-land entry, and, if married, without taking into consideration any entries her husband may have made.
( 2 ) At the time of making final proof claimants of alien birth must have been admitted to citizenship, but evidence of naturalization need not be furnished if it has already been filed in connection with the original declaration or with the proof of an assignment of the entry.
( b ) *Second and additional entries.* A person's right of entry under the desert-land law is exhausted either by filing an allowable application and withdrawing it prior to its allowance or by making an entry or by taking an assignment of an entry, in whole or in part, except under the conditions described in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section. ( 1 ) Under the Act of September 5, 1914 (38 Stat. 712; 43 U.S.C. 182), if a person, otherwise duly qualified to make a desert-land entry, has previously filed an allowable application, or made such entry or entries and through no fault of his own has lost, forfeited, or abandoned the same, such person may make another entry. In such case, however, it must be shown that the prior application, entry, or entries were made in good faith, and were lost, forfeited, or abandoned because of matters beyond the applicant's control, and that the applicant has not speculated in his right, nor committed a fraud or attempted fraud in connection with such prior entry or entries. As the assignment of an entry involves no loss, forfeiture, or abandonment thereof, but carries a benefit to the assignor, it is held to exhaust his right of entry under the desert-land law. Hence, no person who has assigned such entry, in whole or in part, will be permitted to make another entry or to take one or any part thereof by assignment except where paragraph (b)(2) of this section applies.
( 2 ) The Act of June 16, 1955 (69 Stat. 138) authorizes any person who prior to June 16, 1955, made a valid desert-land entry on lands subject to the Acts of June 22, 1910 (36 Stat. 583; 30 U.S.C. 33-85), or of July 17, 1914 (38 Stat. 509; 30 U.S.C. 121-123), if otherwise qualified to enter as a personal privilege not assignable, an additional tract of desert land, providing such additional tract shall not, together with the original entry, exceed 320 acres. Applicants and entrymen under the Act of June 16, 1955, are subject to, and must comply with, all the regulations of this part, including the acreage limitations of § 2520.0-8(b).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,192.42

 2,192.02

 2,191.67

 2,191.27

 2,190.83

 2,190.42

 2,190.00

 2,189.57

 2,189.19

 2,188.70

 2,188.37

 2,188.10

 2,187.83

 2,187.56

 2,187.36

 2,187.16

 2,187.01

 2,186.89

 2,186.75

 2,186.65

 2,186.54

 2,186.49

 2,186.40

 2,186.24

 2,186.06

 2,185.97

 2,185.84

 2,185.61

 2,185.41

 2,185.37

 2,185.29

 543.4

 541.1

 539.1

 536.8

 534.3

 532.0

 529.6

 527.2

 525.0

 522.3

 520.4

 518.9

 517.4

 515.9

 514.8

 513.7

 512.9

 512.2

 511.4

 510.9

 510.3

 510.0

 509.5

 508.6

 507.6

 507.1

 506.4

 505.1

 504.0

 503.8

 503.4

STORAGE

-2.5

-2.3

-2.0

-2.3

-2.5

-2.3

-2.4

-2.4

-2.1

-2.8

-1.8

-1.5

-1.5

-1.5

-1.1

-1.1

-0.8

-0.7

-0.8

-0.6

-0.6

-0.3

-0.5

-0.9

-1.0

-0.5

-0.7

-1.3

-1.1

-0.2

-0.4

CHANGE

-169

-10

-95

-57

-41

-102

-69

-172

37

-331

-128

183

55

-225

122

-220

39

-54

224

62

-52

180

22

170

-96

10

189

268

-290

208

52

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 1,049

 1,134

 889

 1,052

 1,195

 1,048

 1,105

 1,035

 1,094

 1,029

 769

 924

 789

 508

 643

 318

 439

 281

 520

 331

 235

 303

 254

 614

 383

 243

 539

 906

 246

 311

 266

OUTLET

 31

 19

 25

 45

 28

 23

 27

 15

 22

 26

 35

 21

 26

 25

 41

 23

 21

 0

 95

 10

 20

 16

 20

 2

 24

 18

 10

 0

 19

 8

 8

C.F.S.

 .18

 .11

 .15

 .27

 .17

 .14

 .16

 .09

 .13

 .16

 .21

 .13

 .16

 .15

 .25

 .14

 .13

 .00

 .58

 .06

 .12

 .10

 .12

 .01

 .15

 .11

 .06

 .00

 .12

 .05

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 .02

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 18, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -42.5 -290 0 0 20,452 703 4.26 .48

ACRE-FEET -42,500 -575 0 0 40,567 1,394

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 40,567

 40,567

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .48

JULY 1, 2015 3.15

 545.9

Table 4

(1) (1)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF 1RANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Brendan Airways, LLC, Respondent 

Docket No. F AA-20 12-0020 

Case No. 2011EA170024 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan 

AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

COMES NOW the Agency, by and through his designated representative, the Regional 

Counsel for the Eastern Region and her duly designated representative, and hereby 

withdraws its Complaint in this matter pursuant to 14 CFR Section 13.215. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. · 

Regional Counsel . 

By: ··~ 

Zach~nnan Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL:718 553-3258 

FAX: 718 995-5699 

Date: November 29,2012 

RECEIVED 

DEC 1. 8 1.012 

HEARING DOCKET 

1 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent via 

first class mail and facsimile addressed as follows: 

Jason Dickstein, Esq. 

Washington Aviation Group 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, #503. 

Washington, DC 20007 

Telefax: (202)628-6776 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Telefax: (202)366-7536 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent via first 

class mail addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 1 Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014 

IJEC () 2012 

Date: ______ _ ~~~r;;_ Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Regional Counsel 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of City Network, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tiao
Tsan Lai, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                  as amended; and

                  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

 By:          /s/ Tiao Tsan Lai
         ---------------------------
 Name:   Tiao Tsan Lai
         President and Chief Executive Officer

June 13, 2003




                                     E-2
# C_2012057EN.01001001.xml

| 25.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/10

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2012/C 57/06

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) | Republic of Korea | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 (OJ L 59, 27.2.2007, p. 1) corrected by OJ L 215, 18.8.2007, p. 27 | 28.2.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Polyethylene terephthalate (PET)

Republic of Korea

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 192/2007 (OJ L 59, 27.2.2007, p. 1) corrected by OJ L 215, 18.8.2007, p. 27

28.2.2012

---

(1)  OJ C 122, 20.4.2011, p. 10.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 177

 175

 172

 168

 169

 173

 180

 175

 177

 171

 166

 161

 167

 171

 167

 167

 171

 166

 173

 173

 169

 177

 168

 165

 160

 152

 117

 111

 107

 106

 160

 162

 158

 159

 160

 163

 167

 168

 165

 159

 157

 157

 158

 160

 161

 160

 159

 161

 164

 165

 163

 161

 157

 153

 150

 109

 108

 103

 101

 100

 166

 167

 164

 163

 164

 166

 170

 170

 170

 165

 160

 159

 162

 163

 164

 163

 163

 164

 167

 169

 165

 165

 163

 160

 155

 126

 112

 108

 105

 103

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### §1660e. Expanded program authority for urban Indian organizations

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Secretary, acting through the Service, is authorized to establish programs, including programs for awarding grants, for urban Indian organizations that are identical to any programs established pursuant to sections 1621q, 1665a, and 1665g(g) of this title.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title V, §515, as added Pub. L. 111–148, title X, §10221(a), Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 94–437, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1400, known as the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section 515 of Pub. L. 94–437 is based on section 164 of title I of S. 1790, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, as reported by the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate in Dec. 2009, which was enacted into law by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148.
### §8181. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

(Pub. L. 109–401, title II, §281, Dec. 18, 2006, 120 Stat. 2753.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 17.252 Education of institutionalized persons.

A recipient that operates or supervises a program or activity that provides aid, benefits, or services for persons who are institutionalized because of handicap shall ensure that each qualified handicapped person, as defined in § 17.202(d)(2), in its program or activity is provided an appropriate education, as defined in the regulation set forth by the Department of Education at 34 CFR 104.33(b). Nothing in this section shall be interpreted as altering in any way the obligations of recipients under § 17.216.
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.452 Approved certification.

If the TLC is granted, the CO will send a Final Determination notice and a copy of the certified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* to the employer and a copy, if applicable, to the employer's agent or attorney using an electronic method(s) designated by the OFLC Administrator. For employers permitted to file by mail as set forth in § 655.420(c), the CO will send the Final Determination notice and a copy of the certified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* by first class mail. The CO will send the certified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* including approved modifications, on behalf of the employer, directly to USCIS using an electronic method(s) designated by the OFLC Administrator. The employer must retain a copy of the certified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* including the original signed Appendix C, as required by § 655.456.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Zachary M. Graves, the Chief Financial Officer of Bronco
Drilling Company, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 10-K) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 7, 2006



/S/ ZACHARY M. GRAVESZachary M. GravesChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.