alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection and Control Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, of the Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period, extending through September 12, 2006. 

*For further information, contact:*                     Debra M. Younginer, Executive Secretary, Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection and Control Advisory Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, of the Department of Health and Human Services, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., M/S K-57, Atlanta, Georgia 30341-3724, telephone 770/488-1073 or fax 770/488-3230.                 

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for both CDC and ATSDR.                 

Dated: September 20, 2004. 

Alvin Hall, 

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 04-21567 Filed 9-24-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
#### Nassau Hotel Company v. Barnett & Barse Corporation, Impleaded.

Motion granted; questions certified. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
[No. 8446.

Department One.

November 16, 1909.]

#### Hallidie Machinery Company, *Respondent,*v. Hayden Coeur d’Alene Irrigation Company *et al., Appellants.**1*

Appeal — Dismissal—Damases on Dismissal. Damages will not be granted because of the taking of an appeal for delay only, under Bal. Code, § 6522, upon confession of a motion to dismiss and failure to prosecute tbe appeal, where the record is not brought up and there is nothing further to show that the appeal was taken only for delay; it not being the practice to allow other than statutory costs or any special allowance for attendance.

Motion to dismiss an appeal, filed in the supreme court October 28, 1909.

Granted.

*B. B. Adams,*for appellants,

cited: 13 Cyc. 37; *Walter v. Maresch,*3 Wash. 624, 29 Pac. 205; *State ex rel. Maltbie v. Will,*54 Wash. 453, 103 Pac. 479, 104 Pac. 797; *Wheeler v. Commercial Inv. Co.,*22 Wash. 546, 61 Pac. 715.

*Post, Avery*<§- *Higgms,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 105 Pac. 140.

Per Curiam.

Motion to dismiss the appeal, for affirmance of the judgment, and for damages upon the ground that the appeal has not been diligently prosecuted and was taken merely for delay.

The appellants confess the motion to dismiss and affirm, but resist the motion for damages. The only record before us is the motion and an affidavit showing the.appeal was perfected June 12, 1909, and that no subsequent steps have been taken by appellants. The affidavit, also sets forth that respondent has obligated itself to pay an attorney fee of $100 on this appeal; that $40 must necessarily be expended in attendance upon the court for the purpose of this motion, and that appellant has been damaged in the sum of $200 by the annoyance, inconvenience, and delay of the appeal.

*12Doubtless every appeal is a matter of annoyance, inconvenience and delay to the prevailing party. The provision of the statute, Bal. Code, § 6522 (P. C. § 1070), authorizing this court to award damages when satisfied by the record that the appeal was taken for delay only, presupposes by its terms that the delay will be manifested by the record itself. We have here no record except the motion and affidavit. We cannot assume, the only present fact being no steps subsequent to the giving of notice of appeal and filing bond, that the appeal was taken for delay merely. Many reasons might exist why further proceedings were not had. We think, therefore, the record must disclose something other than lapse of time and the annoyance incident to every appeal. It has not been the practice in this court, upon dismissal of appeals, to allow other than the statutory costs, which include an attorney’s fee. We are not disposed to increase the fee so provided in the statute. Neither do we care to adopt a practice of granting a special allowance for attendance upon the court.

The motion to dismiss and affirm is granted; that for damages is denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSBIR Success Stories at NASA Glenn Research CenterThis booklet of success stories summarizes the NASA Glenn Research Center's accomplishments and successes by the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs. These success stories are the results of selecting projects that best support NASA missions and also have commercialization potential. Each success story describes the innovation accomplished, commercialization of the technology, and further applications and usages. The company name and the NASA contact person are identified to encourage further interest and communication to occur.Document ID20000018018Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKim, Walter S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Bitler, Dean W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Prok, George M.*(OMNI Corp. Cleveland, OH United States)*Metzger, Marie E.*(OMNI Corp. Cleveland, OH United States)*Dreibelbis, Cindy L.*(OMNI Corp. Cleveland, OH United States)*Howe, Meghan R.*(OMNI Corp. Cleveland, OH United States)*Novak, George D.*(OMNI Corp. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1999Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209649NASA/TM-1999-209649E-11997Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 295-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000018018.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 698.98

 699.41

 700.00

 700.56

 701.04

 701.38

 701.77

 702.10

 702.42

 702.77

 703.07

 703.33

 703.55

 703.77

 703.98

 704.20

 704.38

 704.57

 704.77

 704.95

 705.14

 705.34

 705.52

 705.71

 705.94

 706.08

 706.29

 706.48

 706.67

 706.84

 579

 588

 602

 615

 626

 634

 643

 651

 659

 667

 675

 681

 687

 692

 698

 703

 708

 713

 718

 723

 728

 733

 738

 742

 748

 752

 758

 763

 768

 773

STORAGE

+12

+9

+14

+13

+11

+8

+9

+8

+8

+8

+8

+6

+6

+5

+6

+5

+5

+5

+5

+5

+5

+5

+5

+4

+6

+4

+6

+5

+5

+5

CHANGE

6

5

7

7

6

4

5

4

4

4

4

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

2

3

2

3

3

3

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2003 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 3, 2003

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +206 111 0 0

ACRE-FEET +206 220 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 567

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Steven O. Cordier, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penford Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: July 11, 2005 /s/ Steven O. Cordier     Steven O. Cordier  *Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,273.98

 2,274.55

 2,275.18

 2,275.68

 2,276.13

 2,276.51

 2,276.87

 2,277.20

 2,277.53

 2,277.80

 2,278.05

 2,278.39

 2,278.66

 2,278.91

 2,279.16

 2,279.43

 2,279.71

 2,280.04

 2,280.38

 2,280.75

 2,281.17

 2,281.59

 2,281.99

 2,282.46

 2,282.93

 2,283.35

 2,283.70

 2,284.07

 2,284.68

 2,285.45

 2,285.97

 1,178.0

 1,183.7

 1,190.1

 1,195.1

 1,199.7

 1,203.5

 1,207.2

 1,210.6

 1,214.0

 1,216.7

 1,219.3

 1,222.8

 1,225.6

 1,228.2

 1,230.7

 1,233.5

 1,236.4

 1,239.9

 1,243.4

 1,247.3

 1,251.7

 1,256.1

 1,260.3

 1,265.3

 1,270.3

 1,274.7

 1,278.5

 1,282.4

 1,289.0

 1,297.3

 1,302.9

STORAGE

+4.9

+5.7

+6.3

+5.1

+4.6

+3.9

+3.7

+3.4

+3.4

+2.8

+2.6

+3.5

+2.8

+2.6

+2.6

+2.8

+2.9

+3.4

+3.6

+3.9

+4.4

+4.4

+4.2

+5.0

+5.0

+4.5

+3.7

+4.0

+6.6

+8.3

+5.6

CHANGE

2,779

3,179

3,413

2,864

2,556

2,210

2,092

2,033

2,032

1,743

1,646

2,201

1,692

1,585

1,660

1,716

1,757

2,026

2,127

2,311

2,559

2,629

2,549

2,912

2,885

2,640

2,185

2,295

3,579

4,589

3,118

INFLOW

 283

 273

 194

 290

 234

 248

 244

 300

 301

 348

 302

 416

 283

 286

 309

 267

 274

 271

 294

 329

 310

 331

 385

 369

 334

 325

 265

 265

 263

 389

 263

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 37

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 29

 18

 21

 24

 24

 12

 0

 33

 27

 0

 51

 18

 6

 0

 46

 37

 18

 28

 43

 34

 31

 71

 43

 34

 41

 22

 38

 38

 13

 13

 19

C.F.S.

 .10

 .06

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .04

 .00

 .11

 .09

 .00

 .17

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .15

 .12

 .06

 .09

 .14

 .11

 .10

 .23

 .14

 .11

 .13

 .07

 .12

 .12

 .04

 .04

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .05

 .54

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .38

 .00

 .02

 .54

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .34

 .19

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +130.2 75,562 9,245 37 0 832 2.71 2.55

ACRE-FEET +130,200 149,877 18,337 73 0 1,650

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 18,337

SPILL 73

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 18,410

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.55

JULY 1, 2009 26.51

 1,173.1

(1) (1)
### §389b. Elimination to permanently nonirrigable lands

Where the Secretary finds that any such lands are permanently nonirrigable he may, with the consent of the landowner, eliminate such lands from the project.

(June 22, 1936, ch. 692, §3, 49 Stat. 1804.)
Exhibit 32.1
           Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries
             Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
    Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
          Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Rodney Tiede, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    (1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2005


/s/ Rodney Tiede
__________________________
Rodney Tiede
Chief Executive Officer
### §1292. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–456, §2, Oct. 3, 1972, 86 Stat. 762, which set out requirements for inclusion on membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 771

 747

 755

 771

 754

 803

 785

 740

 706

 699

 731

 723

 717

 673

 672

 699

 730

 729

 662

 633

 627

 613

 499

 417

 370

 388

 399

 404

 394

 379

 409

 673

 672

 670

 653

 644

 686

 675

 620

 636

 614

 634

 644

 649

 544

 612

 671

 688

 638

 615

 601

 607

 473

 412

 355

 346

 364

 385

 395

 368

 363

 376

 724

 709

 703

 707

 713

 750

 736

 695

 679

 669

 686

 704

 678

 622

 644

 687

 716

 676

 636

 623

 618

 561

 449

 381

 357

 376

 394

 400

 380

 371

 391

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 222

 220

 226

 228

 197

 192

 193

 199

 201

 207

 214

 220

 226

 224

 228

 226

 210

 197

 190

 187

 173

 162

 169

 173

 177

 165

 165

 155

 179

 189

 159

 162

 167

 164

 166

 154

 163

 159

 160

 167

 165

 167

 166

 168

 167

 175

 159

 163

 167

 157

 147

 145

 153

 152

 147

 144

 143

 141

 142

 139

 190

 190

 193

 187

 182

 176

 177

 176

 178

 185

 184

 191

 184

 191

 196

 202

 189

 179

 177

 173

 156

 153

 161

 161

 158

 151

 150

 146

 152

 164

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
(No. 1162

Claimant awarded $400.00.)

#### Moller and Vandenboom Lumber Co., a Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 26, 1927.*

*Contract*— when *State liable for supplies and material.*The State is liable for material and equipment furnished for repairs on its property, at the request of an authorized department of the State.

Paul G. Weisenhorn, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Roy D. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration filed by claimant alleges that it is a corporation, located at Quincy, Illinois, organized, existing and doing business under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois; that on September 26th, 1925, at Quincy,' Illinois, the State of Illinois became and was indebted to claimant in the sum of $400.00; that on June 9th, 1925, the Illinois Soldiers ’ and Sailors’ Home, situated in Quincy, Illinois, issued a repair and equipment requisition, 265, which was authorized June 27, 1925; that on journal voucher No. 548 from the Department of Public Welfare to said Illinois Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Home of Quincy, Illinois, appeared entry of special item for repair and equipment listed corncrib, $600.00; that *427under said requisition is listed an item of $400.00 for lumber to apply on said corncrib listed on above mentioned journal voucher 548, from the Department of Public Welfare, State of Illinois; that under said requisition certain lumber and roofing, an itemized statement of which is attached and made part of said declaration, was sold and delivered by said Holler and Vandenboom Lumber Company of Quincy, Illinois, to said Illinois Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Home; that no part of this account has been paid and that there is now due and owing to claimant said sum of $400.00.

A demurrer filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, is sustained, as a matter of law.

An affidavit of Daniel P. Wild, Chief Clerk of the Illinois Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Home, furnished to .Hon. Leslie Small, Director of the Department of Purchases and Construction, states that this is a good and valid claim and the Illinois Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Home will not contest the claim.

We accordingly award claimant the sum of $400.00.
§ 2.252 Statements of disagreement. ( a ) *Filing of statement.* If the determination of the Assistant Secretary—Policy, Budget and Administration under § 2.75 rejects in whole or part, a petition for amendment, the individual submitting the petition may file with the system manager for the system containing the challenged record a concise written statement setting forth the reasons for disagreement with the determination of the Department.
( b ) *Disclosure of statements.* In any disclosure of a record containing information about which an individual has filed a statement of disagreement under this section which occurs after the filing of the statement, the disputed portion of the record will be clearly noted and the recipient shall be provided copies of the statement of disagreement. If appropriate, a concise statement of the reasons of the Department for not making the requested amendments may also be provided to the recipient.
( c ) *Maintenance of statements.* System managers shall develop procedures to assure that statements of disagreement filed with them shall be maintained in such a way as to assure dissemination of the statements to recipients of the records to which the statements pertain.
[48 FR 56586, Dec. 22, 1983]