alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David B. VOGT, Plaintiff, v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and United States of America, Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 43143.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 26, 1967.

*822David B. Vogt, in pro. per.

Sullivan Cistone, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM

JOHN MORGAN DAVIS, District Judge.

The plaintiff has instituted a suit against the United States on a rather curious cause of action. It is contended that the defendant is negligent for having failed to prosecute the plaintiff for income tax evasion after having been told by Internal Revenue agents in 1962 that a prosecution was forthcoming.

As a result of this impending action by the Government, the plaintiff alleges that he has been unable to keep steady employment and that this fact constitutes deprivation of property under the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.

To redress this wrong, the plaintiff herein seeks damages of ten billion dollars, to be divided equally between the Democratic and Republican parties.

Before this Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss. Although the Government has presented formidable authority in support of lack of consent by the sovereign to be sued, under the circumstances herein presented, it is not necessary to explore this line of reasoning. No citizen possesses a “right” to be either criminally prosecuted, or to be named as defendant in a civil suit, both of which are possible under the Internal Revenue Code. Since no such “right” exists, then there can be no concomitant “duty” on the part of the Government for which damages can be awarded.
##### 



Exhibit 12 Statement Re: Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(amounts in thousands, except ratios) Year Ended December 31,2003
    
    2002
    
    2001
    
    2000
    
    1999Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
    
    $
    51,926
    
    
    $
    39,166
    
    
    $
    45,205
    
    
    $
    63,526
    
    
    $
    86,793Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    6,289
    
    
    $
    1,885
    
    
    $
    4,968
    
    
    $
    1,140
    
    
    $
    Amortized premiums
    
    
    91
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    61
    
    
    
    30Interest component of rental expense(1)
    
    
    554
    
    
    
    479
    
    
    
    692
    
    
    
    648
    
    
    
    572Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    6,934
    
    
    $
    2,425
    
    
    $
    5,721
    
    
    $
    1,849
    
    
    $
    602Pre-tax income from continuing
operations plus fixed charges
    
    $
    58,860
    
    
    $
    41,591
    
    
    $
    50,926
    
    
    $
    65,375
    
    
    $
    87,395Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    8.5
    x
    
    
    17.2
    x
    
    
    8.9
    x
    
    
    35.4
    x
    
    
    145.3
    x
 First ThreeQuarter Ended
    
    Quarters EndedOct. 2, 2004
    
    Oct. 2, 2004Income before income taxes
    
    $
    14,850
    
    
    $
    44,297Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    2,397
    
    
    $
    7,190Interest component of rental expense(1)
    
    
    129
    
    
    
    387Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    2,526
    
    
    $
    7,577Income before income taxes plus fixed charges
    
    $
    17,376
    
    
    $
    51,874Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    6.9
    X
    
    
    6.9
    X
   The Company has adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, effective with the year beginning
January 1, 2002, which resulted in a pre-tax, non-cash goodwill impairment loss
of $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. If the Company had
adopted this accounting change beginning January 1, 1999, and had not amortized
goodwill as under prior accounting policies, the ratio of earnings to fixed
charges would have been 147.0x, 36.2x, and 9.5x for the years ended December
31, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.(1)
    
    Represents appropriate portion (1/3) of rental expense.
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Andrew A. Skarupa, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of RealD Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 11, 2015; and

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Dated: July 29, 2015

/s/ ANDREW A. SKARUPA Andrew A. Skarupa Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 191

 184

 184

 182

 178

 175

 175

 176

 179

 180

 179

 183

 187

 187

 185

 185

 186

 185

 184

 184

 185

 186

 189

 195

 198

 192

 190

 184

 183

 187

 186

 127

 126

 131

 132

 132

 134

 137

 137

 146

 149

 151

 154

 155

 158

 154

 157

 157

 158

 159

 153

 158

 157

 162

 158

 166

 159

 157

 159

 155

 154

 157

 169

 164

 167

 165

 163

 158

 160

 162

 167

 170

 171

 174

 177

 178

 176

 175

 178

 176

 175

 174

 175

 177

 179

 180

 184

 180

 181

 176

 173

 174

 175

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties GrowthFund XXII, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officerof the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chieffinancial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStrain Rate Dependent Modeling of Polymer Matrix CompositesA research program is in progress to develop strain rate dependent deformation and failure models for the analysis of polymer matrix composites subject to high strain rate impact loads. Strain rate dependent inelastic constitutive equations have been developed to model the polymer matrix, and have been incorporated into a micromechanics approach to analyze polymer matrix composites. The Hashin failure criterion has been implemented within the micromechanics results to predict ply failure strengths. The deformation model has been implemented within LS-DYNA, a commercially available transient dynamic finite element code. The deformation response and ply failure stresses for the representative polymer matrix composite AS4/PEEK have been predicted for a variety of fiber orientations and strain rates. The predicted results compare favorably to experimentally obtained values.Document ID19990081117Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsGoldberg, Robert K.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Stouffer, Donald C.*(Cincinnati Univ. OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1999Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-11886NAS 1.15:209433NASA/TM-1999-209433Meeting InformationMeeting: Annual Technical ConferenceLocation: Dayton, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: September 27, 1999End Date: September 29, 1999Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-24-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990081117.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(No. 4660

#### County of Will, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 23,*1955.

Frank H. Masters, Jr., Attorney for Claimant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; Marion G. Tiernan, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Wham, J.

The complaint filed herein on December 28, 1954, by the County of Will, is based .upon Secs. 37, 38 and 39, Chap. 65, Ill. Rev. Stats., which provide that the State of Illinois shall assume and pay to a county, wherein there is located a state penal institution, the necessary expenses incurred by said county and its officers, either by means of service rendered or otherwise, by reason of court proceedings in said county involving a petition for writ of habeas corpus by or on behalf of an inmate of the penal institution located therein, who was not a resident of such county at the time of his commitment, and was not committed by any court located in said county.

*221A portion of the claim set forth in the complaint was barred by Chap. 37, Ill. Rev. Stats., Sec. 439.22, due to the fact that this Court was without jurisdiction with reference to certain items described in the complaint, since they accrued more than two years prior to the filing of the complaint. These items were stricken upon the granting of respondent’s motion, which motion was unopposed by claimant.

The amount prayed remaining for consideration by this Court consists of a claim by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Will County for filing seventy petitions for writs of habeas corpus at the statutory filing fee of $5.00, or a total of $350.00; and a claim by the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Will County for furnishing to the Attorney General of the State of Illinois copies of said petitions at the rate of $0.50 per page, or a total of $231.50.

A stipulation was entered into between claimant and respondent, where, in substance, the facts alleged in the complaint were acknowledged as correct.

We have examined the exhibit attached to the complaint as to the petitions for writs of habeas corpus, and the charges and expenses set forth opposite the names of the petitioners, as well as the law applicable to said claims. It appears to us that claimant is entitled to an award in the sum of $581.50, and the claim in that amount is hereby allowed.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1165 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM002AD

777 - 55A0014 --- 5/8/08 777 - 55A0010 --- 10/26/00

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
----

**Exhibit      21**

|  Name                of                Subsidiary | State                or                Countryof                Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Tronox                LLC                              | Delaware,                United States                                        |
| Tronox                Worldwide LLC                    | Delaware,                United States                                        |
| Tronox                Pigments (Holland) B.V.          | The                Netherlands                                                |
| Tronox                Pigments International GmbH      | Switzerland                                                                   |
| Tronox                Pigments (Savannah), Inc.        | Georgia,                United States                                         |
| Tronox                Western Australia Pty. Ltd       | Western                Australia                                              |
| Tronox                Pigments GmbH                    | Germany                                                                       |
| Tronox                GmbH                             | Germany                                                                       |
| Tronox                Finance (Curacao) N.V.           | Netherlands                Antilles                                           |
| Tronox                Pigments (Holland) N.V.          | Belgium                                                                       |
| Tronox                Pigments Ltd                     | Bahamas                                                                       |
| Tronox                Holdings, Inc.                   | Delaware,                United States                                        |
| Tronox                Luxembourg S.a.r.l.              | Luxembourg                                                                    |
| Tronox                Pigments (Netherlands) B.V.      | The                Netherlands                                                |
| Tronox                (Luxembourg) Holding S.a.r.l.    | Luxembourg                                                                    |
| Tronox                (Switzerland) Holding GmbH       | Switzerland                                                                   |
| Tronox                Denmark International ApS        | Denmark                                                                       |
| Tronox                International ApS                | Denmark                                                                       |
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 2,
2001, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Arnold Industries,
Inc (predecessor to Roadway Next Day Corporation) included as Exhibit 99.3 in
this Annual Report on (Form 10-K) of Roadway Corporation, in the following
Registration Statements:

REGISTRATION                                                          FILING
    NO.                REGISTRATION STATEMENT DESCRIPTION              DATE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 333-58175    Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to      June 30, 1998
              the Roadway Express Deferred Compensation Plan

 333-02562    Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration   July 13, 2001
              Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Roadway
              Corporation (as Successor to Roadway Express, Inc.)
              2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (fka Roadway
              Express, Inc. 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan)

 033-80685    Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration   July 13, 2001
              Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Roadway
              Express, Inc. 401(k) Stock Savings Plan

 333-65202    Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to      July 16, 2001
              the Roadway Corporation Equity Ownership Plan



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 27, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 543.19

 543.17

 543.16

 543.11

 543.10

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 543.00

 542.94

 542.90

 542.89

 542.85

 542.76

 542.76

 542.73

 542.71

 542.70

 542.69

 542.67

 542.64

 542.60

 542.60

 542.50

 542.40

 542.37

 542.37

 542.37

 2,030,250

 2,029,996

 2,029,869

 2,029,233

 2,029,106

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,835

 2,027,073

 2,026,565

 2,026,438

 2,025,930

 2,024,787

 2,024,787

 2,024,406

 2,024,152

 2,024,025

 2,023,898

 2,023,644

 2,023,263

 2,022,755

 2,022,755

 2,021,486

 2,020,216

 2,019,836

 2,019,836

 2,019,836

STORAGE

+0

-254

-127

-636

-127

-1,271

+0

+0

+0

-762

-508

-127

-508

-1,143

+0

-381

-254

-127

-127

-254

-381

-508

+0

-1,269

-1,270

-380

+0

+0

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 604

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 130

 133

 130

 132

 136

 140

 142

 147

 148

 125

 112

 112

 120

 114

 106

 114

 92

 40

 34

 33

 46

 73

 76

 146

 184

 165

 146

 131

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+130

+5

+66

-189

+72

-501

+142

+147

+148

-259

-144

+48

-136

-462

+106

-78

-36

-24

-30

-95

-146

-184

+76

+111

-457

-27

+146

+131

OR

 29

 41

 37

 12

 29

 37

 25

 37

 37

 41

 33

 41

 53

 29

 82

 70

 49

 0

 0

 21

 66

 41

 49

 53

 25

 62

 41

 49

C.F.S.

 .07

 .10

 .09

 .03

 .07

 .09

 .06

 .09

 .09

 .10

 .08

 .10

 .13

 .07

 .20

 .17

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .16

 .10

 .12

 .13

 .06

 .15

 .10

 .12

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .07

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .31

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR July 17, 2006

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2006 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -10,414 0 604 3,207 0 -1,440 1,089 2.65 .76

ACRE-FEET -10,414 0 1,198 6,361 0 -2,856 2,160

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 1,198

PACHECO TUNNEL 6,361 TOTAL 7,559

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2005 TO DATE = 6.15

 2,030,250

SPILL 0 .76

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
### §27. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. 2062; acts July 13, 1892, ch. 164, §1, 27 Stat. 120; July 1, 1898, ch. 545, §1, 30 Stat. 573, authorized the President to require that military officers perform the duties of Indian agents. The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with since 1908. See section 64 of this title and notes thereunder.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000740628
<NAME> INTERFERON SCIENCES RESEARCH PARTNERS LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Gerald B. Schwartz et al., Appellants. Paul Montalvo et al., Respondents.

Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 978.]