alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.33



February 13, 1997


Mr. Viren Sheth
Tristar Corporation
12500 San Pedro, Suite 500
San Antonio, Texas 78216

RE:    Employment Agreement dated April 19, 1996 by and between Tristar
       Corporation and Joseph DeKama

Dear Viren:

Notice is hereby given that effective immediately I resign my position as an
employee and as Executive Vice President and Director of Sales of Tristar
Corporation for the United States and Canada. Thank you for the opportunity to
serve.

As per our agreement in connection with this resignation, we are executing a
Independent Contractor Agreement and a Transition Agreement for transfer of the
New York Tristar Office and assets, which are attached hereto as Exhibit A & B
and incorporated herein by reference, and I agree that my future business
activity will be restricted in accordance with the terms and provisions of the
Independent Contractor relationship.

I hereby acknowledge that as of March 1, 1997, I owe the sum of $133,818.44 to
Tristar Corporation, which sum is represented by Promissory Notes dated October
16, 1996 in the original principal amounts of $45,000.00 and $100,000.00,
respectively, copies of such Promissory Notes are attached hereto and marked
Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference (the "Promissory Notes"). I
agree such Promissory Notes will be paid in accordance with their terms. If
such Promissory Notes are not paid in accordance with their terms (i.e. in
monthly principal payments of $1,875.00 and $2,777.78, respectively, plus
accumulated interest on such notes), Tristar is hereby authorized to offset the
payments to be made under the Independent Contractor Agreement to use as
payment of the monthly sums due under the Promissory Notes. Upon any such event
of offset, I will continue to be bound by the terms, conditions and
restrictions set forth in the Independent Contractor Agreement.

With the acceptance of both parties of this resignation, it is agreed by both
parties each will be held harmless as to all matters occurring prior to the
date hereof, whether known or unknown, including all aspects of the prior
contractual agreement.

Sincerely,


Joseph Dekama


This resignation is hereby approved and accepted:



TRISTAR CORPORATION


BY:                                         Date:
   ------------------------------------           -------------------------
      Viren S. Sheth, President
### §334. Allotments to Indians not residing on reservations

Where any Indian not residing upon a reservation, or for whose tribe no reservation has been provided by treaty, act of Congress, or executive order, shall make settlement upon any surveyed or unsurveyed lands of the United States not otherwise appropriated, he or she shall be entitled, upon application to the local land office for the district in which the lands are located, to have the same allotted to him or her, and to his or her children, in quantities and manner as provided in this act for Indians residing upon reservations; and when such settlement is made upon unsurveyed lands the grant to such Indians shall be adjusted upon the survey of the lands so as to conform thereto; and patents shall be issued to them for such lands in the manner and with the restrictions as provided in sections 348 and 349 of this title. And the fees to which the officers of such local land office would have been entitled had such lands been entered under the general laws for the disposition of the public lands shall be paid to them, from any moneys in the Treasury of the United States not otherwise appropriated, upon a statement of an account in their behalf for such fees by the Secretary of the Interior or such officer as he may designate, and a certification of such account to the Secretary of the Treasury by the Secretary of the Interior.

(Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, §4, 24 Stat. 389; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This act, referred to in text, is act Feb. 8, 1887, ch. 119, 24 Stat. 388, and is popularly known as the Indian General Allotment Act. For classification of this act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 331 of this title and Tables.

The words "provided in sections 348 and 349 of this title", referred to in text, were in the original "as herein provided".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Permanent Appropriation; Repeals

Effective July 1, 1935, the permanent appropriation provided for in the last sentence of this section was repealed by act June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §1, 48 Stat. 1225.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

"Secretary of the Interior or such officer as he may designate" substituted in text for "Commissioner of the General Land Office" on authority of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out in the Appendix to Title 5.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings.

# SUMMARY:

                        Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure  Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393) the Lolo and Kootenai National Forests' Sanders County Resource Advisory Committee will meet on November 10, 2004 at 6:30 p.m. in                               ( print page 57901)                            Thompson Falls, Montana for business meetings. The meetings are open to the public.                    

# DATES:

November 10, 2004.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Thompson Falls Courthouse, 1111 Main Street, Thompson Falls, MT 59873.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Hojem, Designated Forest Official (DFO), District Ranger Plains/Thompson Falls District, Lolo National Forest at  (406) 826-3821, or Shana Neesvig, Committee Coordinator, Cabinet Ranger District, Koorenai National Forest at (406) 827-3533.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda topics include approving project proposals for funding and receiving public comment. If the meeting location is changed, notice will be posted in the local newspapers, including the Clark Fork Valley Press, Sanders County Ledger, Missoulian, and River Journal.

Dated: September 20, 2004.

Randy Hojen,

Designated Federal Official, District Ranger, Plains/Thompson Falls Ranger District.

[FR Doc. 04-21697  Filed 9-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual report of Gammacan International Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tovi Ben Zeev, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  January 13, 2005                            By: /s/ TOVI BEN ZEEV
                                                       ------------------
                                                       Tovi Ben Zeev
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 371

 347

 349

 344

 357

 346

 354

 357

 345

 297

 290

 289

 291

 299

 302

 300

 288

 299

 307

 304

 291

 307

 307

 305

 312

 315

 314

 314

 309

 332

 349

 336

 334

 334

 332

 346

 337

 340

 349

 294

 285

 266

 270

 286

 292

 294

 282

 282

 284

 300

 277

 281

 282

 300

 298

 302

 308

 310

 295

 297

 311

 333

 359

 343

 342

 339

 352

 340

 347

 352

 323

 291

 278

 278

 288

 295

 298

 291

 286

 289

 304

 288

 286

 293

 304

 301

 307

 312

 312

 303

 303

 320

 343

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John W. LaCasse, Appellant.

All concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 162

 153

 159

 156

 157

 169

 161

 158

 163

 161

 165

 170

 176

 173

 175

 172

 174

 181

 176

 178

 174

 171

 168

 161

 156

 152

 150

 144

 133

 127

 147

 147

 151

 149

 150

 155

 156

 150

 151

 153

 159

 163

 168

 170

 168

 167

 166

 169

 167

 166

 164

 161

 160

 153

 148

 148

 142

 130

 123

 122

 151

 150

 154

 152

 153

 159

 158

 156

 155

 157

 161

 166

 171

 171

 171

 169

 169

 173

 172

 171

 168

 166

 163

 158

 152

 150

 147

 136

 127

 124

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Miguel RODRIGUEZ-MERCADO, also known as Miguel Villafranco-Ponce, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40372.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern Dis*203trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Miguel Rodriguez-Mercado appeals his guilty-plea conviction for being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after deportation, having previously been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b).

Rodriguez-Mercado challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Rodriguez-Mercado contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Rodriguez-Mercado properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
### §340. Extension of certain provisions

The provisions of the Act of February 8, 1887, are declared to extend to and are made applicable to the Confederated Wea, Peoria, Kaskaskia, and Piankeshaw tribes of Indians, and the Western Miami tribe of Indians, located in the northeastern part of the former Indian Territory and to their reservation, in the same manner and to the same extent as if said tribes had not been excepted from the provisions of said act, except as to section 349 of this title, and as otherwise hereinafter provided.

(Mar. 2, 1889, ch. 422, §1, 25 Stat. 1013.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of February 8, 1887, referred to in text, was in the original "chapter One hundred and Nineteen of the acts of eighteen hundred and eighty seven, entitled 'An act to provide for the allotment of lands in severalty to Indians on the various reservations, and to extend the protection of the laws of the United States and the Territories over the Indians, and for other purposes,' ". The Act appears in 24 Stat. 388, and is popularly known as the Indian General Allotment Act. For classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 331 of this title and Tables.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, James K. B. Hesketh, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Resources Corporation (the“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, (the “Form 10-Q”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: August 13, 2007 /s/ James K. B. Hesketh   James K. B. Hesketh   Chief Executive Officer
#### § 685.530 What planning documents are required for grants funded by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act?

The required planning documents will be described in the FOA.
### **CHAPTER 24—INDIAN LAND CONSOLIDATION**

Sec.
2201.
Definitions.
2202.
Other applicable provisions.
2203.
Adoption of land consolidation plan with approval of Secretary.
2204.
Purchase of trust or restricted or controlled lands at no less than fair market value; requisite conditions.
2205.
Tribal probate codes; acquisitions of fractional interests by tribes.
2206.
Descent and distribution.
2207.
Full faith and credit to tribal actions under tribal ordinances limiting descent and distribution of trust or restricted or controlled lands.
2208.
Conveyancing authority upon sale or exchange of tribal lands; removal of trust status of individually owned lands.
2209.
Trusteeship title of United States for any Indian or Indian tribe.
2210.
Tax exemption.
2211.
Governing body of tribe; construction of chapter as not vesting with authority not authorized by tribal constitution or by-laws.
2212.
Fractional interest acquisition program.
2213.
Administration of acquired fractional interests; disposition of proceeds.
2214.
Establishing fair market value.
2215.
Acquisition Fund.
2216.
Trust and restricted land transactions.
2217.
Reports to Congress.
2218.
Approval of leases, rights-of-way, and sales of natural resources.
2219.
Application to Alaska.
2220.
Owner-managed interests.
2221.
Annual notice and filing; current whereabouts of interest owners.
#### § 2.10 May you ask for the processing of your request to be expedited?

You may ask for the processing of your request to be expedited. If you are seeking expedited processing, your request must include a justification that addresses and meets the criteria in § 2.20 of this part and includes the certification required at § 2.20(b)(2) of this part. Failure to provide sufficient justification or the required certification will result in a denial of the expedited processing request.

[81 FR 11128, Mar. 3, 2016]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLife of Pennzane and 815Z-Lubricated Instrument Bearings Cleaned with Non-CFC SolventsLife tests were conducted on instrument scanner ball bearings cleaned with 3 types of non-ozone depleting solvents and compared with those cleaned with a conventional CFC-113 (Freon) solvent. The test bearings were lubricated with the standard space oil (Bray 815Z, Fomblin Z25) and a more recent synthetic space oil (Pennzane 2001). Lives with replacement solvents equaled or exceeded those obtained with CFC-113 baseline, indicating that alternate cleaning solvents were acceptable. Pennzane lubricated bearings enjoyed a significant life advantage (>5X) over those lubricated with Bray 815Z oil in these oscillatory gimbal bearing tests. Many of the Pennzane bearings are still exhibiting acceptable torque traces after more than 25,000 hr of test.Document ID19990095611Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsLoewenthal, Stuart H.*(Lockheed Martin Missiles and Space Sunnyvale, CA United States)*Jones, William R., Jr.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Predmore, Roamer E.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1999Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-11821NASA/TM-1999-209392NAS 1.15:209392Meeting InformationMeeting: European Space Mechanisms and TribologyLocation: ToulouseCountry: FranceStart Date: September 29, 1999End Date: October 1, 1999Sponsors:European Space AgencyFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 226-11-15Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990095611.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 688.560 What participant costs are allowable under the YouthBuild program? Allowable participant costs include: ( a ) The costs of payments to participants engaged in eligible work-related YouthBuild activities;
( b ) The costs of payments provided to participants engaged in non-work-related YouthBuild activities;
( c ) The costs of needs-based payments;
( d ) The costs of supportive services; and
( e ) The costs of providing additional benefits to participants or individuals who have exited the program and are receiving follow-up services, which may include: ( 1 ) Tuition assistance for obtaining college education credits;
( 2 ) Scholarships to a registered apprenticeship or technical education program; and
( 3 ) Employer- or Government-sponsored health programs.
#### Jasper Lynch & Fishel, Inc., et al., Respondents, v. Frieda Fingerhood et al., Appellants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 500.30

 500.02

 501.09

 501.01

 501.23

 501.45

 501.22

 501.32

 501.33

 501.41

 501.41

 501.58

 501.20

 500.73

 500.22

 500.46

 499.98

 499.50

 500.09

 500.75

 501.01

 500.56

 500.29

 499.92

 499.48

 500.14

 501.00

 500.61

 502.08

 502.02

 55,628

 55,325

 56,486

 56,398

 56,641

 56,883

 56,630

 56,740

 56,751

 56,839

 56,839

 57,027

 56,608

 56,094

 55,541

 55,802

 55,282

 54,770

 55,401

 56,116

 56,398

 55,910

 55,617

 55,218

 54,748

 55,455

 56,387

 55,964

 57,580

 57,512

STORAGE

+400

-303

+1,161

-88

+243

+242

-253

+110

+11

+88

+0

+188

-419

-514

-553

+261

-520

-512

+631

+715

+282

-488

-293

-399

-470

+707

+932

-423

+1,616

-68

CHANGE

1,028

1,226

1,511

640

597

542

286

451

382

396

322

384

60

-5

-9

397

-1

4

579

620

408

2

95

36

0

593

709

28

1,057

203

INFLOW

 820

 1,372

 920

 678

 468

 413

 408

 390

 369

 346

 317

 283

 264

 248

 264

 257

 255

 255

 255

 260

 260

 246

 239

 237

 235

 235

 237

 239

 239

 234

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 6

 7

 6

 6

 6

 7

 6

 6

 7

 6

 5

 6

 7

 6

 6

 8

 6

 7

 6

 0

 6

 2

 4

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 12/01/2018

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +2,284 12,541 11,243 0 0 146

ACRE-FEET +2,284 24,875 22,300 0 0 290

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 22,300

SPILL 0 22,300

 55,228

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,024

 1,220

 1,502

 649

 598

 544

 287

 461

 396

 401

 330

 393

 40

 7

 5

 503

 5

 5

 606

 734

 322

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 614

 14

 456

 14

 11,200

 22,215

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of LiquidmetalTechnologies Incorporated (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), I, John Thorne, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to  18 U. S. C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15  (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 

 

2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date: March 28, 2005   | By:    | /s/   John Thorne           |   |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                             |
|   |                             |   | John Thorne                           |
|   |                             |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                                  |        |                                       |        |  |

 

----