alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1600

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-12, the Bureau of Land Management removed all amendments to part 1600 made effective on Jan. 11, 2017, at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016.

#### § 1601.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to establish in regulations a process for the development, approval, maintenance, amendment and revision of resource management plans, and the use of existing plans for public lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
EXHIBIT 31.2

                        ANNUAL CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Greenwood, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB A (1) of San Jose
International Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this annual report the conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on the most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of the most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
24th day of December 2003.

/s/ Christopher Greenwood
-------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 508.69

 508.99

 509.16

 509.33

 509.02

 509.52

 509.13

 509.62

 509.52

 509.29

 508.99

 508.91

 508.54

 508.14

 508.86

 508.99

 509.33

 509.04

 509.21

 509.21

 508.86

 509.04

 509.25

 509.27

 508.76

 508.91

 509.02

 507.80

 507.98

 508.43

 508.88

 65,338

 65,708

 65,920

 66,132

 65,745

 66,369

 65,882

 66,494

 66,369

 66,082

 65,708

 65,609

 65,154

 64,661

 65,548

 65,708

 66,132

 65,770

 65,982

 65,982

 65,548

 65,770

 66,032

 66,057

 65,425

 65,609

 65,745

 64,247

 64,465

 65,018

 65,572

STORAGE

+1,225

+370

+212

+212

-387

+624

-487

+612

-125

-287

-374

-99

-455

-493

+887

+160

+424

-362

+212

+0

-434

+222

+262

+25

-632

+184

+136

-1,498

+218

+553

+554

CHANGE

2,638

2,226

2,225

2,255

1,973

2,370

1,828

2,353

1,964

1,836

1,763

1,932

1,788

1,816

2,542

2,136

2,230

1,673

1,857

1,766

1,571

1,955

1,999

1,852

1,516

1,985

1,951

1,063

1,895

2,043

1,981

INFLOW

 1,998

 2,018

 2,099

 2,130

 2,148

 2,034

 2,053

 2,026

 2,010

 1,957

 1,933

 1,963

 1,999

 2,045

 2,076

 2,010

 1,999

 1,842

 1,734

 1,746

 1,769

 1,823

 1,851

 1,830

 1,818

 1,878

 1,859

 1,801

 1,767

 1,748

 1,686

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 26

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 22

 21

 19

 18

 20

 21

 21

 18

 17

 24

 19

 19

 18

 20

 19

 19

 17

 14

 16

 20

 21

 20

 16

 9

 17

 14

 23

 17

 18

 16

 16

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2013 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 08/01/2013

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,459 60,982 59,650 26 0 569

ACRE-FEET +1,459 120,958 118,316 52 0 1,129

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 118,316

SPILL 52 118,368

 64,113

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,616

 2,144

 2,187

 2,215

 1,955

 2,324

 1,802

 2,304

 1,939

 1,802

 1,752

 1,890

 1,773

 1,791

 2,498

 2,104

 2,176

 1,640

 1,846

 1,775

 1,544

 1,956

 1,983

 1,865

 1,508

 1,996

 1,938

 1,087

 1,887

 2,115

 1,967

 60,379

 119,762

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 07-3809

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Lynda J. Craig, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 6, 2009

Filed: January 16, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Lynda Craig appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after she pleaded

guilty to conspiring to distribute methamphetamine and possessing a firearm in

furtherance of the conspiracy. Craig’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a

brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Craig pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement containing a waiver of any

right to appeal unless her sentence exceeded the statutory maximum or was an illegal
-2-

sentence. We now enforce the appeal waiver because the record establishes Craig

knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and waiver; the appeal falls

within the scope of the waiver; and no miscarriage of justice would result from

enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.

2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); United States v. EstradaBahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver

in Anders case).

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal beyond the scope of the waiver.

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2 — CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andaccompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended March 31,2007 of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (the “Issuer”).The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and thatthe information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Issuer.Date: May 9, 2007     By: /s/ RANDALL T. MAYS  Name:  Randall T. Mays  Title: President and Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuerand will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
April 2024

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

1,966

1 740.61 2,061 95 48 0 0

2 742.31 2,146 85 43 0 0

3 743.89 2,227 81 41 0 0

4 745.34 2,304 77 39 0 0

5 746.76 2,382 78 39 0 0

6 748.03 2,452 70 35 0 0

7 749.27 2,523 71 36 0 0

8 748.82 2,497 -26 41 54 0

9 746.45 2,365 -132 47 114 0

10 744.00 2,233 -132 45 112 0

11 741.46 2,103 -130 44 110 0

12 738.86 1,975 -128 45 110 0

13 736.30 1,854 -121 47 108 0

14 734.25 1,760 -94 59 106 0

15 731.76 1,651 -109 51 106 0

16 728.95 1,532 -119 44 104 0

17 729.23 1,544 12 64 58 0

18 730.88 1,613 69 35 0 0

19 732.39 1,678 65 33 0 0

20 733.76 1,738 60 30 0 0

21 735.02 1,795 57 29 0 0

22 736.21 1,850 55 28 0 0

23 737.31 1,901 51 26 0 0

24 738.35 1,951 50 25 0 0

25 739.36 1,999 48 24 0 0

26 740.17 2,039 40 20 0 0

27 740.86 2,073 34 17 0 0

28 741.53 2,107 34 17 0 0

29 739.95 2,028 -79 12 52 0

30 736.17 1,848 -180 7 98 0

TOTALS -118 1,071 1,132 0

ACRE-FEET -118 2,124 2,245 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 2,245

Spill 0

Total 2,245

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 5/10/2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 163

 153

 162

 166

 170

 171

 159

 159

 156

 148

 143

 150

 134

 140

 116

 118

 118

 107

 109

 119

 114

 106

 106

 105

 100

 100

 116

 109

 96

 105

 100

 127

 133

 141

 147

 148

 148

 147

 143

 135

 131

 126

 121

 114

 111

 106

 105

 101

 97

 96

 97

 94

 98

 99

 91

 88

 87

 91

 89

 84

 77

 79

 136

 141

 148

 153

 153

 153

 152

 149

 144

 137

 133

 131

 124

 118

 111

 109

 108

 102

 101

 101

 102

 102

 102

 99

 96

 94

 97

 95

 90

 89

 89

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
================================================================================

                                  EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Hybrid  Technologies,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB for the year  ended July 31,  2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Holly
Roseberry,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)         The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of  operations
            of the Company.

            /s/ Holly Roseberry
            ----------------------
            Holly Roseberry
            Chief Executive Officer and
            Principal Financial Officer

November  8, 2006
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOptical Analysis of Impact Features in Aerogel From the Orbital Debris Collection Experiment on the MIR StationThe Mir Environmental Effects Package (MEEP) was deployed on the Mir station and retrieved after 18 months in space. The payload included the orbital debris collector (ODC), designed and built at the Johnson Space Center to capture and return analyzable residues of the man-made and natural particulate environment in low-Earth orbit for a detailed assessment of its compositional makeup and potential origins. The ODC exposed 2 identical trays, with highly porous, low-density SiO2 aerogel as the basic collector medium, pointed in opposite directions. The aerogel was expected to gently decelerate and capture hypervelocity particles, as opposed to other media that resulted in melting or vaporization of many impactors. Even cursory examination of the returned ODC collectors revealed a surprising variety of impact features. The compositional analyses using scanning electron "miccroscope-energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy concentrated on a survey-type inventory of diverse particle types and associated impact features. Detections, in the form of carrot-shaped tracks and shallow pits, included metallic Al, stainless steel, soldering compounds, human waste, and paint flakes. Many pits contained no detectable impactor residue (it was assumed to have vaporized), but most of the tracks contained analyzable residue. The study showed that aerogel would be useful for future low-velocity impact analysis.Document ID19990116769Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHoerz, Friedrich*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Cress, Glen*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Zolensky, Mike*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*See, Thomas H.*(Lockheed Martin Corp. Houston, TX United States)*Bernhard, Ronald P.*(Lockheed Martin Corp. Houston, TX United States)*Warren, Jack L.*(Lockheed Martin Corp. Houston, TX United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1999Subject CategorySpace Sciences (General)Report/Patent NumberS-849NAS 1.15:209372NASA/TM-1999-209372Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990116769.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-93,060-01; WR-93,060-02; WR-93,060-03; WR-93,060-04; WR-93,060-05

EX PARTE JONATHAN REYES, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W18-30384-X(A); W18-30784-X(A); W18-24882-X(A); W16-60459-X(A) & 

W16-60460-X(A) 

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 6 FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated robbery, two counts of evading arrest,

and one count of theft. He was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment on the two evading

convictions,twentyand twenty-five years’ imprisonment on the aggravated robberies, and two years’

imprisonment on the theft. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Reyes v. State,

Nos. 05-18-01486-CR; 05-18-01487-CR; 05-18-01488-CR; 05-18-01489-CR; 05-18-01490-CR

(Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 4, 2020). Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in

the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that his pleas were involuntary because counsel told him he would get
2

sentenced to a substance abuse facility, not prison. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might

entitle him to relief. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970). Accordingly, the record should

be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC.

art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In

developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial

court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him

at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial

court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

pleas were involuntary. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems 

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 22, 2021

Do not publish
### §1251. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–253, §1, Mar. 17, 1972, 86 Stat. 64, which related to distribution of judgment funds and payment of attorney fees and expenses, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### **CHAPTER 29—INDIAN GAMING REGULATION**

Sec.
2701.
Findings.
2702.
Declaration of policy.
2703.
Definitions.
2704.
National Indian Gaming Commission.
2705.
Powers of Chairman.
2706.
Powers of Commission.
2707.
Commission staffing.
2708.
Commission; access to information.
2709.
Interim authority to regulate gaming.
2710.
Tribal gaming ordinances.
2711.
Management contracts.
2712.
Review of existing ordinances and contracts.
2713.
Civil penalties.
2714.
Judicial review.
2715.
Subpoena and deposition authority.
2716.
Investigative powers.
2717.
Commission funding.
2717a.
Availability of class II gaming activity fees to carry out duties of Commission.
2718.
Authorization of appropriations.
2719.
Gaming on lands acquired after October 17, 1988.
2720.
Dissemination of information.
2721.
Severability.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Frank S. Lyle.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
### §1681. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title II], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–190; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327, which provided that the Indian Health Service was to neither bill nor charge those Indians who may have economic means to pay unless and until Congress directs Service to implement policy to do so, was from the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1996, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriations acts. Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

Pub. L. 103–332, title II, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2529.

Pub. L. 103–138, title II, Nov. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 1409.

Pub. L. 102–381, title II, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1409.

Pub. L. 102–154, title II, Nov. 13, 1991, 105 Stat. 1027.

Pub. L. 101–512, title II, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1952.

Pub. L. 101–121, title II, Oct. 23, 1989, 103 Stat. 734.

Pub. L. 100–446, title II, Sept. 27, 1988, 102 Stat. 1816.

Pub. L. 100–202, §101(g) [title II], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–213, 1329–245.

Pub. L. 99–500, §101(h) [title II], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–277, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(h) [title II], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–277.

Pub. L. 99–190, §101(d) [title II], Dec. 19, 1985, 99 Stat. 1224, 1256.

Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(c) [title II], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1837, 1865.
### §1201. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–283, §1, June 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 313, which related to per capita distributions of judgment funds, eligibility of tribal members for distributions, and payment of attorney's fees, expenses, and other deductions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §1779c. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 107–331, title VI, §605, Dec. 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 2848, which related to settlement of claims, appropriations, and allocation of funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21466]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time:  Tuesday, September 28, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C. Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings 
or arbitration. Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters 
affecting a particular employee.
* * * * *

Date and Time:  Wednesday, September 29, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  Oral hearing will be open to the public.

Matter Before the Commission: Rev. Alfred C. Sharpton and Sharpton 
2004.
* * * * *

Date and Time:  Thursday, September 30, 2004 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

Items To be Discussed:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2004-29: Representative Todd Akin and Todd Akin 
for Congress, by counsel Cleta Mitchell.
    Advisory Opinion 2004-32: Spirit Airlines, Inc., by Yvonne L. 
Ramos, Assistant General Counsel and Director Governmental & Community 
Affairs.
    Advisory Opinion 2004-35: Kerry-Edwards 2004, by counsel Marc 
Elias.
    Final Rules and Explanation and Justification on Inaugural 
Committees.
    Candidate Debates--Notice of Disposition of Petition for 
Rulemaking.
    Routine Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:  Mr. Robert Biersack, Acting Press 
Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 04-21466 Filed 9-21-04; 11:06 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M