alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 970

Claimant awarded $1,000.00.)

#### William A. Crookston, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 10,*1927.

Military *service*— when *award may*be *made.*Where claimant an officer of the Illinois National Guard under orders from his superior officer, is injured while obeying said orders, the court may as a matter of social justice and equity allow an award to him for the injuries sustained.

Clarence B. Davis, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Chief Justice Clarity

delivered the opinion of the court:

Claimant is in the employ of the State Auditor’s office. He is also an officer of the Illinois National Guard; that in the summer of 1925, while as such officer he attended the guard encampment at Camp Grant. On Sunday afternoon, August 23, 1925, claimant was ordered by a superior officer at Camp Grant to place-entries for the Roman race. The entries were placed, and while claimant was obeying his orders he was struck by an unmanageable horse ridden by another superior officer. The claimant was knocked down, sustaining injuries to his face and jaw. His upper jaw bone was broken and five teeth were knocked out at the time. His lower lip was cut and his entire face was bruised. He was taken to a hospital at Rockford, Illinois, where his injuries were dressed and treated, and as a result of the accident fourteen of the upper teeth and a portion of his jawbone were removed. In fact, it was shown by the testimony that he suffered a considerable length of time on account of this injury and that he is now using artificial teeth, although it is shown that his teeth were in fair condition before the accident occurred. There is no contradiction of hearing as to the extent of the injury or the manner of the accident, and it appearing to the court that this claimant suffered this accident while in a line of patriotic duty therefore, as a matter of equity and good conscience, an allowance is recommended.

Therefore it is considered by the court that claimant be allowed $1000.00.
### §3715a. Operation of Fund

#### (a) Deposits to Fund

The Panama Canal Commission shall make deposits on a regular basis to the Fund, beginning on October 1, 1988, to accumulate an amount sufficient to defray the estimated total cost of liability for the workers' compensation benefits and other payments payable under chapter 81 of title 5 for the disability or death of employees of the Panama Canal Commission or any of its predecessor agencies on account of injuries sustained on or before December 31, 1999, except for those claims arising before, on, or after October 1, 1988, for which the Secretary of Labor has assumed fiscal responsibility.

#### (b) Calculation of amounts to be deposited

The amounts deposited under subsection (a) shall be based upon periodic actuarial studies conducted by experts or consultants whose services are procured by the Panama Canal Commission by contract. The amounts of such deposits shall take into consideration interest earnings in accordance with subsection (c) of this section and expected cost of living adjustments as provided in section 8146a of title 5, but not amounts payable by the Commission for continuation of pay pursuant to section 8118 of such title.

#### (c) Investment of amounts in Fund

The Secretary of the Treasury, upon the request of the Secretary of Labor, shall invest moneys in the Fund in public debt securities which shall bear interest at rates determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, taking into consideration the current average market yield on outstanding marketable obligations of the United States of comparable maturity. Such interest shall be credited to and form a part of the Fund.

(Pub. L. 100–705, §3, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4685.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Panama Canal Commission Compensation Fund Act of 1988, and not as part of the Panama Canal Act of 1979 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1988, see section 10 of Pub. L. 100–705, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 3612 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 2,310.64

 2,310.92

 2,311.14

 2,311.41

 2,311.66

 2,311.86

 2,312.08

 2,312.26

 2,312.45

 2,312.61

 2,312.74

 2,312.88

 2,313.06

 2,313.27

 2,313.46

 2,313.66

 2,313.84

 2,314.02

 2,314.21

 2,314.54

 2,314.93

 2,315.28

 2,315.61

 2,315.90

 2,316.16

 2,316.40

 2,316.67

 2,317.12

 1,591.6

 1,595.1

 1,597.8

 1,601.2

 1,604.4

 1,606.9

 1,609.6

 1,611.9

 1,614.3

 1,616.3

 1,618.0

 1,619.7

 1,622.0

 1,624.7

 1,627.1

 1,629.6

 1,631.9

 1,634.2

 1,636.6

 1,640.8

 1,645.8

 1,650.3

 1,654.5

 1,658.2

 1,661.5

 1,664.6

 1,668.1

 1,673.9

STORAGE

+4.0

+3.5

+2.8

+3.4

+3.1

+2.5

+2.8

+2.3

+2.4

+2.0

+1.6

+1.8

+2.3

+2.7

+2.4

+2.5

+2.3

+2.3

+2.4

+4.2

+5.0

+4.5

+4.2

+3.7

+3.3

+3.1

+3.5

+5.8

CHANGE

2,040

2,490

1,749

1,919

2,046

1,703

1,733

1,607

1,581

1,580

1,179

1,232

1,463

1,733

1,585

1,651

1,470

1,602

1,479

2,518

2,859

2,660

2,474

2,256

1,994

1,865

2,131

3,223

INFLOW

 19

 716

 338

 188

 460

 423

 323

 443

 362

 540

 326

 326

 309

 390

 366

 365

 312

 432

 247

 393

 341

 363

 312

 344

 279

 295

 348

 296

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 7

 11

 22

 22

 4

 15

 15

 19

 11

 22

 26

 15

 7

 0

 4

 7

 7

 19

 11

 4

 11

 38

 30

 38

 30

 11

 30

 0

C.F.S.

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .06

 .01

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .06

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .10

 .08

 .10

 .08

 .03

 .08

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .29

 .45

 .00

 .03

 .07

 .00

 .41

 .68

 .09

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .90

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2005 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 12, 2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +86.4 53,822 9,856 0 0 436 1.17 3.04

ACRE-FEET +86,400 106,756 19,549 0 0 865

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 19,549

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 19,549

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.04

JULY 1, 2004 20.64

 1,587.6

Table 4

(1) (1)
§ 681.560 What is entrepreneurial skills training and how is it taught? Entrepreneurial skills training provides the basics of starting and operating a small business. ( a ) Such training must develop the skills associated with entrepreneurship. Such skills may include, but are not limited to, the ability to: ( 1 ) Take initiative;
( 2 ) Creatively seek out and identify business opportunities;
( 3 ) Develop budgets and forecast resource needs;
( 4 ) Understand various options for acquiring capital and the trade-offs associated with each option; and
( 5 ) Communicate effectively and market oneself and one's ideas.
( b ) Approaches to teaching youth entrepreneurial skills include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Entrepreneurship education that provides an introduction to the values and basics of starting and running a business. Entrepreneurship education programs often guide youth through the development of a business plan and also may include simulations of business start-up and operation.
( 2 ) Enterprise development which provides supports and services that incubate and help youth develop their own businesses. Enterprise development programs go beyond entrepreneurship education by helping youth access small loans or grants that are needed to begin business operation and by providing more individualized attention to the development of viable business ideas.
( 3 ) Experiential programs that provide youth with experience in the day-to-day operation of a business. These programs may involve the development of a youth-run business that young people participating in the program work in and manage. Or, they may facilitate placement in apprentice or internship positions with adult entrepreneurs in the community.
### NUMBER S 13 - 14 - 00 169 - CR & 13 - 14 - 00170 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ MARKUS A. GREEN , A ppellant , v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 24 th District Court of DeWitt County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Mar kus A. Green, proceeding pro se , filed notices of appeals on March 17, 2014 from trial court cause numbers 90 - 1 - 7951 & 90 - 1 - 7951 - A , docketed in our appellate cause num ber 13 - 14 - 00169 - CR, and trial court cause numbers 90 - 1 - 7952 & 90 - 1 - 7952 - A , docketed in our appellate cause number 13 - 14 - 00170 - CR . He has now filed a motion to dismiss these appeals because he no longer desires to prosecute them

.2

See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.2( a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss also erroneously references an appellate cause number that does not exist , 13 - 14 - 00168 - CR, and an appellate cause number that belongs to a different appellant, 13 - 14 - 00171 - CR, Michael David Ramirez aka Michael Ramirez aka David Michael Ramirez v. State of Texas

. The Court, having examined and fully considered appellant’s pro se motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeals, is of the opinion that the motion should be dismissed as moot, in part, and granted, in part. To the extent that appellant’s motion to dismiss concerns inapplicable cause numbers, we DISMISS the motion as moot. To the extent that appellant’s motion addresses his appellate cause numbers 13 - 14 - 00169 - CR and 13 - 14 - 00170 - CR , w ithout passing on the merits of the se case s , we GRANT the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and DISMISS the appeal s . Having dismissed the appeal s at appellant's request, no motion s for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate s will issue forth with. PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 47.2(b). D elivered and filed the 17th day of April, 2014

.
Table 24

U.S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Preliminary Data Subject to Change Central Valley Operations Office

San Joaquin and Mendota Pool

Monthly Deliveries in AF 2017

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Fresno Slough WD 14 16 38 48 200 219 126 192 67 62 112 112 1,206

Tranquility Public Utilities District 

(TPUD) (formerly Hughes, Melvin)

0 0 0 0 24 21 10 0 0 0 0 0 55

James ID 2,170 410 310 594 6,009 4,643 6,207 7,878 7,438 4,720 2,033 0 42,412

Meyers (SLWD) 715 1,525 1,417 1,201 1,039 809 354 987 875 36 1,032 941 10,931

Dudley & Indart (formerly Coelho-GardnerHanson)

0 25 291 204 563 747 802 644 272 357 93 30 4,028

Mid-Valley WD (no contract)(Kings River) 0 72 1,169 1,149 954 883 436 0 0 0 0 0 4,663

Reclamation District #1606 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 23 36

Terra Linda Farms (Coelho Family Trust) 0 36 445 682 1,040 811 1,220 699 492 421 58 12 5,916

Tranquility ID 0 1,158 1,544 1,681 4,285 4,965 4,419 2,669 1,335 1,205 470 546 24,277

Westlands WD (Lateral 6 & 7) 1,021 2,960 4,465 5,735 4,647 3,895 861 21 0 0 0 0 23,605

Lempesis V.L. (Wilson, JW) 0 0 20 54 98 114 81 21 36 26 29 48 527

Laguna WD (via CCID) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

San Luis WD (via CCID) 0 0 0 7 10 66 67 56 58 9 0 2 275

Total 3,920 6,202 9,699 11,355 18,869 17,173 14,583 13,167 10,573 6,836 3,840 1,714 117,931

Exchange Contractors

Central California ID (CCID) 0 3,123 24,146 27,329 69,440 68,619 79,406 69,854 33,660 16,617 15,067 8,393 415,654

Columbia Canal Co 0 0 2,322 5,458 8,025 9,082 9,101 7,487 7,937 9,095 1,850 58 60,415

Firebaugh Canal WD 0 155 899 1,414 4,326 6,627 7,210 5,565 2,035 1,016 1,857 589 31,693

San Luis Canal Co (SLCC) 0 3,149 5,389 6,321 14,818 24,161 30,332 23,517 8,562 4,128 3,947 5,400 129,724

Total 0 6,427 32,756 40,522 96,609 108,489 126,049 106,423 52,194 30,856 22,721 14,440 637,486

Refuges

Grasslands WD (via CCID & SLCC ) 117 1,850 3,201 354 7,400 6,494 1,643 3,344 16,489 15,336 4,640 4,102 64,970

China Island Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 286 0 0 0 0 0 208 64 0 0 171 380 1,109

Los Banos WMA (CDFG) (via CCID & SLCC) 269 395 421 954 312 879 683 787 3,652 4,120 2,321 2,474 17,267

Mendota Wildlife Area (CDFG) 1,302 1,637 462 586 1,400 1,592 2,070 3,460 2,940 5,227 2,238 3,167 26,081

Salt Slough Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 240 351 909 599 225 954 1,699 490 773 755 336 424 7,755

Freitas Unit (USFWS) (via CCID) 236 310 735 494 338 472 212 0 239 637 286 354 4,313

Kesterson (USFWS) (via CCID) 235 181 473 305 408 383 0 93 595 888 279 313 4,153

San Luis NWR (USFWS) (via SLCC) 6,817 0 1,917 1,720 2,164 3,024 715 0 2,000 4,505 2,000 1,363 26,225

0

Total 9,502 4,724 8,118 5,012 12,247 13,798 7,230 8,238 26,688 31,468 12,271 12,577 151,873

Total Deliveries 13,422 17,353 50,573 56,889 127,725 139,460 147,862 127,828 89,455 69,160 38,832 28,731 907,290

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
**Exhibit 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements and in the relatedprospectuses of ARRIS Group, Inc. listed below of our reports dated February 28, 2007, with respectto the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ARRIS Group, Inc., ARRIS Group, Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of ARRIS Group, Inc., included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006:Registration Statement No. 333-67934 on Form S-8 (Broadband Parent Corporation2001 Stock Incentive Plan)Registration Statement No. 333-68018 on Form S-8 (ARRIS Group, Inc. EmployeeSavings Plan)Registration Statement No. 333-85544 on Form S-8 (ANTEC Corporation 2000 StockIncentive Plan; ANTEC Corporation 2000 Mid-Level Stock Option Plan; ANTECCorporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan; ANTEC Corporation Amended and RestatedEmployee Stock Incentive Plan (1993); ANTEC Corporation Directors Stock OptionPlan (1993); TSX Corporation 1996 Second Amended and Restated Long-Term IncentiveCompensation Plan; TSX Corporation 1993 Amended and Restated Directors StockOption Plan; and the TSX Corporation 1994 W.H. Lambert Stock Option Agreement)Registration Statement No. 333-105908 on Form S-8 (ARRIS Group, Inc. 2002 StockIncentive Plan)Registration Statement No. 333-105909 on Form S-8 (ARRIS Group, Inc. EmployeeStock Purchase Plan)Registration Statement No. 333-133009 on Form S-8 (ARRIS Group, Inc. 2004 StockIncentive Plan)Registration Statement No. 333-138445 on Form S-3ASR (automatic shelf registrationstatement)/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPAtlanta, Georgia
### §1303. Habeas corpus

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall be available to any person, in a court of the United States, to test the legality of his detention by order of an Indian tribe.

(Pub. L. 90–284, title II, §203, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 78.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 104

 94

 108

 97

 96

 97

 96

 95

 98

 91

 87

 84

 96

 99

 98

 90

 102

 118

 120

 127

 131

 133

 137

 141

 142

 147

 145

 147

 143

 144

 142

 80

 79

 77

 80

 80

 80

 78

 75

 74

 73

 73

 75

 78

 80

 81

 80

 79

 98

 112

 119

 124

 123

 128

 131

 126

 133

 134

 136

 135

 133

 137

 88

 86

 90

 86

 87

 88

 88

 85

 85

 81

 79

 80

 87

 88

 88

 86

 86

 105

 115

 122

 127

 127

 132

 136

 135

 137

 137

 138

 137

 138

 139

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 24, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### Alice Gorta, Respondent, v. Albert P. Gorta, Appellant.

In an action for separation, judgment in favor of plaintiff modified on the facts by striking from the second and third ordering paragraphs the figures *“*$60 ” and inserting *814in said paragraphs in place thereof the figures *“*$40 ”; and by striking from the third ordering paragraph the figures “ $805.65 ” and inserting in place thereof the figures *“*537.13 ”. As thus modified, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, without costs. The second conclusion of law is amended by striking out the figures *“*$60 ” and inserting in place thereof the figures *“*$40 ”. The third conclusion of law is amended by striking out the figures “ $60 ” and *“*$805.65 ” and inserting in place thereof,' respectively, the figures *“*$40 ” and “ $537.13 ”. In our opinion the allowance of $60 weekly for the support and maintenance of plaintiff was excessive. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. Settle order on notice.
#### Eve Nemours, Appellant-Respondent, v. Charles Nemours, Respondent-Appellant, and Leon Densen, Impleaded Defendant-Appellant-Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 709.]
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



April 29, 2003


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

         The certification set forth below is being submitted to the Securities
and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complying with Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This certification is not
to be deemed to be filed pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
does not constitute a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Report")
accompanying this letter.

         Richard J. Pershing, the Chief Executive Officer and J. William
Holden, the Chief Financial Officer of Mirant Americas Generation, LLC (the
"Company"), each certifies that, subject to the qualification noted below, to
the best of my knowledge:

         1.       such Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.

         This certificate is qualified by the fact that the Report was not
filed within 90 days after the end of the Company's fiscal year as required by
General Instruction A to Form 10-K.


                                             /s/ Richard J. Pershing
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Name: Richard J. Pershing
                                             Chief Executive Officer

                                             /s/ J. William Holden III
                                             ---------------------------
                                             Name: J. William Holden III
                                             Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §3056. Prohibition on disclosure

#### (a) Nondisclosure of information

#### (1) In general

The Secretary shall not disclose under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the "Freedom of Information Act"), information relating to—

(A) subject to subsection (b)(l),1 human remains or cultural items reburied on National Forest System land under section 3053 of this title; or

(B) subject to subsection (b)(2), resources, cultural items, uses, or activities that—

(i) have a traditional and cultural purpose; and

(ii) are provided to the Secretary by an Indian or Indian tribe under an express expectation of confidentiality in the context of forest and rangeland research activities carried out under the authority of the Forest Service.

#### (2) Limitations on disclosure

Subject to subsection (b)(2), the Secretary shall not be required to disclose information under section 552 of title 5 (commonly known as the "Freedom of Information Act"), concerning the identity, use, or specific location in the National Forest System of—

(A) a site or resource used for traditional and cultural purposes by an Indian tribe; or

(B) any cultural items not covered under section 3053 of this title.

#### (b) Limited release of information

#### (1) Reburial

The Secretary may disclose information described in subsection (a)(l)(A) 2 if, before the disclosure, the Secretary—

(A) consults with an affected Indian tribe or lineal descendent;

(B) determines that disclosure of the information—

(i) would advance the purposes of this chapter; and

(ii) is necessary to protect the human remains or cultural items from harm, theft, or destruction; and

(C) attempts to mitigate any adverse impacts identified by an Indian tribe or lineal descendant that reasonably could be expected to result from disclosure of the information.

#### (2) Other information

The Secretary, in consultation with appropriate Indian tribes, may disclose information described under paragraph (1)(B) or (2) of subsection (a) if the Secretary determines that disclosure of the information to the public—

(A) would advance the purposes of this chapter;

(B) would not create an unreasonable risk of harm, theft, or destruction of the resource, site, or object, including individual organic or inorganic specimens; and

(C) would be consistent with other applicable laws.

(Pub. L. 110–234, title VIII, §8106, May 22, 2008, 122 Stat. 1288; Pub. L. 110–246, §4(a), title VIII, §8106, June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1664, 2050.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 enacted identical sections. Pub. L. 110–234 was repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.

#### Definition of "Secretary"

"Secretary" as meaning the Secretary of Agriculture, see section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.

1 So in original. Probably should be "(b)(1),".

2 So in original. Probably should be "(a)(1)(A)".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0562 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT EARL STAUDENMAYER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 26 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2021

10/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0562