alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.71

 130.77

 130.80

 130.78

 130.73

 130.70

 130.84

 130.87

 130.99

 130.85

 130.87

 130.70

 130.82

 130.80

 130.77

 130.93

 130.80

 130.94

 130.80

 130.69

 130.79

 130.69

 130.93

 130.82

 130.63

 130.60

 130.59

 130.78

 130.85

 130.81

 130.80

 657

 664

 667

 665

 659

 656

 671

 675

 689

 673

 675

 656

 669

 667

 664

 682

 667

 683

 667

 655

 666

 655

 682

 669

 648

 644

 643

 665

 673

 668

 667

STORAGE

+0

+7

+3

-2

-6

-3

+15

+4

+14

-16

+2

-19

+13

-2

-3

+18

-15

+16

-16

-12

+11

-11

+27

-13

-21

-4

-1

+22

+8

-5

-1

CHANGE

665

612

585

556

622

688

751

779

700

643

592

641

670

663

661

606

562

527

571

612

636

628

571

551

556

592

629

671

651

608

593

INFLOW

 56

 57

 57

 57

 62

 65

 65

 65

 65

 67

 68

 68

 68

 68

 62

 54

 54

 48

 42

 40

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 37

 36

 36

PUTAH

 607

 550

 525

 499

 561

 624

 677

 711

 626

 582

 521

 581

 594

 595

 599

 542

 515

 470

 535

 577

 590

 595

 517

 518

 527

 554

 591

 621

 608

 573

 556

PUTAH

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .43

 .41

 .39

 .40

 .47

 .42

 .41

 .38

 .45

 .56

 .53

 .52

 .42

 .37

 .44

 .37

 .34

 .40

 .44

 .39

 .49

 .41

 .44

 .48

 .44

 .51

 .32

 .36

 .44

 .54

 .54

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JULY 2021 RUN DATE: 08/02/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +10 19,392 17,741 1,601 47 13.51 .00

ACRE-FEET +10 38,464 35,189 3,176 93

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,176

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 35,189

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2021 .00

 657

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 8.13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 824.59

 824.12

 823.69

 823.53

 823.16

 822.80

 822.31

 821.89

 821.43

 820.97

 820.50

 820.08

 819.66

 819.21

 818.78

 818.30

 817.72

 817.25

 816.78

 816.39

 815.83

 815.32

 814.82

 814.31

 813.78

 813.27

 812.78

 812.25

 811.70

 811.47

 811.45

 31.53

 31.06

 30.64

 30.48

 30.12

 29.77

 29.30

 28.90

 28.46

 28.03

 27.60

 27.21

 26.83

 26.42

 26.03

 25.61

 25.09

 24.69

 24.28

 23.95

 23.47

 23.05

 22.63

 22.22

 21.79

 21.38

 21.00

 20.58

 20.16

 19.99

 19.97

STORAGE

-0.45

-0.47

-0.42

-0.16

-0.36

-0.35

-0.47

-0.40

-0.43

-0.43

-0.43

-0.39

-0.38

-0.41

-0.39

-0.43

-0.51

-0.41

-0.41

-0.33

-0.47

-0.43

-0.41

-0.42

-0.43

-0.41

-0.39

-0.41

-0.42

-0.18

-0.02

CHANGE

-2

-11

-14

24

52

57

-6

24

13

6

7

29

32

18

28

8

-37

16

-183

54

-20

7

14

12

4

16

25

11

6

22

35

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 5

 10

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 208

 208

 185

 92

 220

 220

 218

 218

 218

 217

 220

 219

 220

 219

 219

 219

 217

 218

 17

 218

 216

 216

 218

 218

 217

 217

 217

 216

 216

 107

 41

OUTLET

 7

 7

 5

 1

 5

 3

 4

 4

 4

 7

 6

 6

 5

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 6

 5

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

C.F.S.

 .23

 .21

 .16

 .02

 .17

 .10

 .12

 .13

 .14

 .23

 .20

 .19

 .18

 .18

 .15

 .14

 .14

 .15

 .13

 .15

 .11

 .22

 .18

 .13

 .10

 .16

 .12

 .10

 .12

 .11

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

OCTOBER 2008 RUN DATE: 11/01/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -12.02 247 6,089 85 131 4.56 .43

ACRE-FEET -12,020 490 12,078 169 260

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 169

OUTLET

TOTAL

 12,078

 12,247

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .43

JULY 1, 2008 .43

 31.98

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
EXHIBIT 11 — COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE                 (In thousands of dollars, except per share data) Six Months Ended June 30, Three Months Ended June 30,  2005 2004 2005 2004Numerator:                Net income $268,614  $370,230  $220,732  $253,770 Effect of dilutive securities — none                                 Numerator for net income per common share — diluted $268,614  $370,230  $220,732  $253,770                  Denominator:                Weighted average common shares  551,673   613,517   543,904   610,478                  Effect of dilutive securities:                Stock options and common stock warrants  1,307   2,775   1,186   2,482                  Denominator for net income per common share — diluted  552,980   616,292   545,090   612,960                  Net income (loss) per common share:                                 Basic $.49  $.60  $.41  $.42                                                    Diluted $.49  $.60  $.40  $.41
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 312

 260

 249

 240

 243

 245

 227

 217

 206

 204

 190

 203

 211

 203

 195

 184

 179

 176

 181

 180

 181

 206

 216

 207

 202

 201

 208

 205

 210

 197

 194

 201

 203

 186

 185

 169

 151

 133

 137

 121

 124

 121

 120

 131

 139

 139

 136

 125

 140

 144

 144

 149

 150

 158

 166

 166

 165

 169

 169

 173

 230

 229

 224

 214

 211

 207

 199

 180

 164

 157

 151

 152

 154

 161

 162

 158

 155

 153

 156

 156

 156

 163

 174

 176

 178

 178

 179

 179

 183

 181

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 1600
Editorial Note: At 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-12, the Bureau of Land Management removed all amendments to part 1600 made effective on Jan. 11, 2017, at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016.

§ 1610.5-1 Resource management plan approval and administrative review. ( a ) The proposed resource management plan or revision shall be submitted by the Field Manager to the State Director for supervisory review and approval. When the review is completed the State Director shall either publish the proposed plan and file the related environmental impact statement or return the plan to the Field Manager with a written statement of the problems to be resolved before the proposed plan can be published.
( b ) No earlier than 30 days after the Environmental Protection Agency publishes a notice of the filing of the final environmental impact statement in the Federal Register, and pending final action on any protest that may be filed, the State Director shall approve the plan. Approval shall be withheld on any portion of a plan or amendment being protested until final action has been completed on such protest. Before such approval is given, there shall be public notice and opportunity for public comment on any significant change made to the proposed plan. The approval shall be documented in a concise public record of the decision, meeting the requirements of regulations for the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (40 CFR 1505.2).
[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 70 FR 14567, Mar. 23, 2005; 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
§ 686.970 How does Job Corps ensure that centers or other service providers comply with the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act and the WIOA regulations? ( a ) If the Department receives a complaint or has reason to believe that a center or other service provider is failing to comply with the requirements of WIOA or WIOA regulations, the Regional Director must investigate the allegation and determine within 90 days after receiving the complaint or otherwise learning of the alleged violation, whether such allegation or complaint is true.
( b ) As a result of such a determination, the Regional Director may: ( 1 ) Direct the center operator or service provider to handle a complaint through the grievance procedures established under § 686.960; or
( 2 ) Investigate and determine whether the center operator or service provider is in compliance with WIOA and WIOA regulations. If the Regional Director determines that the center or service provider is not in compliance with WIOA or WIOA regulations, the Regional Director may take action to resolve the complaint under § 686.965(b), or will report the incident to the Department of Labor Office of the Inspector General, as described in § 683.620 of this chapter.
```

[115th Congress Public Law 53]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 131 STAT. 1091]]

Public Law 115-53
115th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To amend Public Law 94-241 with respect to the Northern Mariana 
             Islands. <<NOTE: Aug. 22, 2017 -  [H.R. 339]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Northern Mariana 
Islands Economic Expansion Act.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 48 USC 1801 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Mariana Islands Economic 
Expansion Act''.
SEC. 2. COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS: TRANSITIONAL 
                    WORKERS.

    Section 6 of Public Law 94-241 (48 U.S.C. 1806) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(6), by striking ``$150'' and inserting 
        ``$200''; and
            (2) <<NOTE: Permits.>> in subsection (d)(2)--
                    (A) by striking the period at the end of the first 
                sentence and inserting ``, except a permit for 
                construction occupations (as that term is defined by the 
                Department of Labor as Standard Occupational 
                Classification Group 47-0000 or any successor provision) 
                shall only be issued to extend a permit first issued 
                before October 1, 2015.''; and
                    (B) by striking `` `ending on December 31, 2019'.'' 
                and inserting ``ending on December 31, 2019, except that 
                for fiscal year 2017 an additional 350 permits shall be 
                made available for extension of existing permits, 
                expiring after the date of enactment of the Northern 
                Mariana Islands Economic Expansion Act through September 
                30, 2017, of which no fewer than 60 shall be reserved 
                for healthcare practitioners and technical operations 
                (as that term is defined by the Department of Labor as 
                Standard Occupational Classification Group 29-0000 or 
                any successor provision), and no fewer than 10 shall be 
                reserved for plant and system operators (as that term is 
                defined by the

[[Page 131 STAT. 1092]]

                Department of Labor as Standard Occupational 
                Classification Group 51-8000 or any successor 
                provision).''.

    Approved August 22, 2017.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 339:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 163 (2017):
            Jan. 30, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 1, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Aug. 11, House concurred in Senate amendment.

                                  <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amador ZAMBRANO-DUENEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40292.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern Dis*235trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Amador Zambrano-Duenez (Zambrano) appeals his sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326 for illegal reentry into the United States after having been deported. Zambrano asserts that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should therefore be vacated. He contends that the collection of his DNA violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.

In *United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005) *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662), which was decided after Zambrano filed his brief, this court declined to address such an argument on the ground that the claim was not ripe for review. In accordance with *Riascos-Cuenu,*this court lacks jurisdiction over this argument.

Zambrano also argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. This challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Athough Zambrano contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Zambrano properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 146

 145

 148

 130

 130

 122

 127

 136

 115

 138

 150

 114

 108

 102

 119

 106

 100

 101

 100

 96

 97

 89

 92

 99

 101

 94

 99

 105

 107

 97

 110

 105

 113

 116

 109

 109

 102

 104

 93

 96

 104

 97

 96

 85

 80

 93

 88

 90

 83

 79

 86

 76

 76

 80

 78

 80

 83

 85

 86

 76

 124

 129

 130

 121

 117

 115

 112

 121

 108

 110

 121

 102

 101

 98

 102

 100

 95

 97

 94

 90

 90

 85

 84

 92

 87

 88

 92

 96

 94

 87

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 2, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Christopher MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-20442.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Tony Christopher Mejia raises arguments that are foreclosed by *United States v. Daugherty,*264 F.3d 513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001), which rejected a Commerce Clause challenge to the felon-in-possession-of-afírearm statute, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 144

 146

 145

 135

 136

 141

 139

 140

 147

 141

 136

 144

 145

 152

 151

 148

 148

 148

 141

 140

 142

 146

 147

 141

 153

 152

 152

 155

 152

 139

 129

 136

 123

 121

 126

 124

 124

 126

 127

 111

 130

 137

 140

 139

 138

 139

 121

 118

 126

 128

 128

 127

 128

 123

 132

 134

 130

 122

 120

 120

 132

 141

 139

 125

 130

 130

 128

 130

 133

 128

 133

 141

 142

 142

 142

 141

 139

 126

 130

 131

 134

 135

 134

 130

 139

 140

 138

 132

 130

 128

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 16, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Veterans� healthy living /
 
2008: Winter | Spring| Summer | Fall
2009: Winter | Spring| Summer | Fall
2010:Winter | Spring | Summer | Fall
2011:Winter | Spring | Summer | Fall
2012:Winter | Spring | Summer | Fall
2013:Winter | Spring | Summer | Fall
2014: Winter | Spring| Summer | Fall
2015: Winter | Spring| Summer | Fall
2016:Winter | Spring | Summer | Fall
2017: Winter | Spring| Summer | Fall
2018: Spring
2019: Winter | Spring | Summer | Fall
 
SuDoc Number:VA 1.124:VISN 1/L 76/
Item Number: 0983-E-12 (online)
CGP System Number: 001003852
 
 
 
September 19, 2017**
### §1300d–27. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 105–387, §8, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3475, which related to challenges to the constitutionality or validity of distributions under this part, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
<TABLE>

EXHIBIT 11  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

In thousands of dollars, except per share data

                                                       Six months ended
                                                            June 30,
                                                    2000                1999
Numerator:

<S>                                                <C>                 <C>
  Net income (loss)                                $  (8,167)          $93,764

  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Eller put/call option agreement                       --            (2,334)
    Convertible debt -- 2.625% issued in 1998          4,905  *           5,687
    Convertible debt -- 1.5% issued in 1999            4,875  *              --
    LYONS -- 1996 issue                                (241)*               --
    LYONS -- 1998 issue                                2,271  *              --
    Less: Anti-dilutive items                        (11,810)                 -

Numerator for net income (loss) per
  common share - diluted                           $  (8,167)          $ 97,117

Denominator:
  Weighted average common shares                     338,871            287,012

  Effect of dilutive securities:
     Stock options and common stock warrants          10,280  *           5,129
    Eller put/call option agreement                       --              1,693
    Convertible debt -- 2.625% issued in 1998          9,282  *           9,282
    Convertible debt -- 1.5% issued in 1999            9,454  *              --
    LYONS -- 1996 issue                                3,872  *              --
    LYONS -- 1998 issue                                3,085  *              --
    Less: Anti-dilutive items                        (25,693)                 -

Denominator for net income (loss)
  per common share - diluted                         338,871            303,116

Net income (loss) per common share:
  Basic                                            $    (.02)          $    .33

  Diluted                                          $    (.02)          $    .32

* Denotes items that are anti-dilutive to the calculation of earnings per share.


</TABLE>
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T07:50:03-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
May 27, 2015

Mr. Matt Sersion

835 Maine Ave. Long Beach, CA 90813

Dear Mr. Sersion:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 16, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1049), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure