alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	Amount: $50,000	Dated: May 10, 2021


 


For value received, for the acquisition of Strategic
Asset Holdings, LLC, the undersigned Maker promises to pay to the order of Jason Tucker or his successors in interest, the sum of Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), with interest accruing annually for one year, payable on May 10, 2022 as follows:


 


(a)      
Interest shall be payable on the due date at the rate of Seven Point Five Percent (7.5%), per annum.


 


(b)      
All principal and accrued interest shall be due and payable on May 10, 2022 This Note shall be subject to the following terms and
conditions:


 


1.    
Holidays. If the due date of any payment under this Note falls on a Saturday, a Sunday, or a date that is a legal holiday
under the laws of the United States, the payment for that date shall be due on the next succeeding business day.


 


2.    
“Timely Payment” Defined. Payment is timely made if it is actually received by Lender or his legal representatives
on or before the date on which it is due, or if it is mailed by the United States Postal Service and is postmarked on or before the date
on which it is due.


 


3.    
Medium of Payment. Payment may be made by cash, personal check, certified check, cashier’s check, money order, marketable
securities, or any other additional means acceptable to Lender.


 


4.    
Where Payment Made. Payment may be made to Lender, or his/her legal representative, at (insert address) or at such other
place as he/she may designate in writing from time to time.


 


5.    
Prepayment. Maker may prepay all or any portion of the principal balance of this Note and any interest payments thereunder
at any time, without penalty or premium.


 


6.    
“Default” Defined. The Maker will be in default if timely payment of any payment of principal or interest is
not made when due and Maker does not cure the deficiency within (30) calendar days after written notice delivered to Maker.


 


7.    
Acceleration. Whenever Maker is in default, Lender shall have the option to declare the entire principal balance and all
interest accrued thereon in default, and immediately due and payable.


 


8.     Lender’s
Remedies. In the event of any default in payment of any installment and in addition to all other
rights and obligations set forth herein, the Maker shall be responsible for reasonable attorneys’ fees, and legal and other
expenses for the collection thereof. In addition, the undersigned hereby waives presentment, demand for payment, notice of dishonor,
and all other notices or demands in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or endorsement of this
Note.


 


9. Governing Law. This Note shall be construed
under the laws of the State of Wyoming.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this 10th day of May, 2021.


 


MAKER:


 


/s/ Jason Tucker


Jason Tucker – CEO/Director


General Entertainment Ventures, Inc.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of StealthGas Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), the undersigned officer of the Company hereby certifies to the undersigned’s knowledge, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

|  |          |                                                                                                                       |
|--|----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Dated: June 5, 2007

/s/ Harry N. Vafias                                        

Harry N. VafiasPresident and Chief Executive Officer

----
### §2508. Role of the Director

Applications for grants under this chapter, and all application modifications, shall be reviewed and approved by personnel under the direction and control of the Director of the Office of Indian Education Programs. Required reports shall be submitted to education personnel under the direction and control of the Director of such Office.

(Pub. L. 100–297, title V, §5209, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1043, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2077.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2508, Pub. L. 100–297, title V, §5209, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 394; Pub. L. 100–427, §14, Sept. 9, 1988, 102 Stat. 1609; Pub. L. 101–301, §5(b), May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 207; Pub. L. 103–382, title III, §382(d), (e), Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 4017, 4018, related to application with respect to Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1043, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 2063. See section 2507 of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Jan. 8, 2002, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of Pub. L. 107–110, set out as a note under section 6301 of Title 20, Education.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 15, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00338

- CV

Travis CROW, Britt A. Crow, Laurian Crow Edison, and Karen A. Kraft

, Appellant

v.

Heddie Knappick LOOKADOO, Lisa Knappick Lucas, Mary Brown, Margaret Brown Nugent, Charles Brown, Joseph Gallagher, Josephine Brown Noll, Pamela Gallagher Palmer, and Irene B. Zoeller, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 10

- 00188

- CVL Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellant ’ s unopposed second motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby

GRANTED. Time is extended to September 13, 2017.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of August, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada Chief Deputy Clerk
### §3107. Direct payment of forest products receipts

#### (a) Regulations

Notwithstanding any other law, the Secretary shall, within 1 year from November 28, 1990, promulgate regulations providing for the payment of the receipts from the sale of Indian forest products as provided in this section.

#### (b) Payment into a bank depository

Upon the request of an Indian tribe, the Secretary shall provide that the purchaser of the forest products of such tribe, which are harvested under a timber sale contract, permit or other harvest sale document which has been approved by the Secretary, shall make prompt direct payments of the gross proceeds of sales of such forest products, less any amounts segregated as forest management deductions pursuant to section 3105 of this title, into a bank depository account designated by such Indian tribe.

(Pub. L. 101–630, title III, §308, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 4537.)
### §183. Marriage of white men to Indian women; evidence

Whenever the marriage of any white man with any Indian woman, a member of any such tribe of Indians, is required or offered to be proved in any judicial proceeding, evidence of the admission of such fact by the party against whom the proceeding is had, or evidence of general repute, or of cohabitation as married persons, or any other circumstantial or presumptive evidence from which the fact may be inferred, shall be competent.

(Aug. 9, 1888, ch. 818, §3, 25 Stat. 392.)
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |      /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009                              |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### §1300g–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–89, title I, §103, Aug. 18, 1987, 101 Stat. 667, which provided for restoration of Federal trust relationship between the United States and the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §2304. Identification of right to payment and expedited claim payment

#### (a) Search of records

The Secretary shall conduct a search of the records of the Department of the Interior to identify individuals who are entitled to any portion of the unauthorized disbursements which were made and to ascertain the amount of such unauthorized disbursements to which each of such individuals is entitled.

#### (b) Payment without filing of claim

In any case in which the Secretary ascertains the name and location of any individual who is entitled to any portion of an unauthorized disbursement and determines the amount of such unauthorized disbursement to which such individual is entitled, the Secretary shall pay such amount, including interest thereon as provided in section 2302 of this title, to such individual immediately without requiring such individual to file a formal claim for payment.

#### (c) Notification

The Secretary shall use the best available means of notifying each individual who is identified in the search conducted under subsection (a) of the right of such individual to receive payment under this chapter. The means of notification available to the Secretary shall include—

(1) notice provided directly to such individual;

(2) notification of the next of kin of such individual;

(3) notification of the chairman or chief executive officer of the tribe of which such individual is a member or of which the deceased Indian was a member; and

(4) publication of notice in newspapers of general circulation in the appropriate area.

(Pub. L. 98–500, §5, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2318.)
### §1773g. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–41, §9, June 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 88, which related to exercise of jurisdiction as provided in the Settlement Agreement and as otherwise provided by Federal law, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 of Clear Channel Communications, Inc. (the Issuer). The undersigned hereby certifies that the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Issuer. Date: May 6, 2005 By:
    /s/ RANDALL T. MAYSName:
    Randall T. MaysTitle:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Issuer
and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, or its staff, upon request.
Table 24

U.S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Preliminary Data Subject to Change Central Valley Operations Office

San Joaquin and Mendota Pool

Monthly Deliveries in AF 2019

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Fresno Slough WD 69 222 219 224 181 282 278 76 27 0 24 0 1,602

Tranquility Public Utilities District 

(TPUD) (formerly Hughes, Melvin)

0 0 24 0 0 15 25 25 0 0 0 0 89

James ID 0 1,105 0 5,666 5,083 3,045 7,307 10,989 3,138 342 812 0 37,487

Meyers (SLWD) 777 1,280 812 1,073 889 897 543 218 70 46 25 0 6,630

Dudley & Indart (formerly Coelho-GardnerHanson)

11 26 79 172 170 426 828 423 233 216 110 0 2,694

Mid-Valley WD (no contract)(Kings River) 0 0 0 0 369 952 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,321

Reclamation District #1606 0 0 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62

Terra Linda Farms (Coelho Family Trust) 33 79 348 699 629 1,128 1,340 608 438 426 121 12 5,861

Tranquility ID 293 1,885 1,415 2,257 2,558 4,862 5,660 3,626 1,597 1,286 702 0 26,141

Westlands WD (Lateral 6 & 7) 0 0 0 579 1,319 3,979 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,877

Carvalho (Lempesis, Wilson, JW) 9 9 36 94 102 144 95 32 29 32 22 0 604

Laguna WD (via CCID) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

San Luis WD (via CCID) 0 0 81 48 7 81 25 62 45 10 6 0 365

Del Puerto WD (via CCID) 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 14 0 29

0

Total 1,192 4,606 3,014 10,874 11,307 15,826 16,101 16,059 5,577 2,358 1,836 12 88,762

Exchange Contractors

Central California ID (CCID) 3,507 7,474 16,601 30,256 40,326 64,449 74,715 69,657 41,228 16,341 18,519 1,755 384,828

Columbia Canal Co 0 852 6,177 5,335 4,361 6,720 8,208 5,841 6,676 8,302 6,004 161 58,637

Firebaugh Canal WD 0 482 569 1,589 2,037 6,170 7,404 5,061 2,456 1,212 1,744 1,279 30,003

San Luis Canal Co (SLCC) 3,735 0 7,271 10,764 10,644 22,459 31,630 23,002 2,037 3,147 4,996 3,364 123,049

Total 7,242 8,808 30,618 47,944 57,368 99,798 121,957 103,561 52,397 29,002 31,263 6,559 596,517

Refuges

Grasslands WD (via CCID & SLCC ) 1,067 1,434 1,205 793 3,643 1,592 424 2,132 11,450 14,403 4,260 2,459 44,862

China Island Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 562 130 79 78 92 30 166 122 38 2 41 918 2,258

Los Banos WMA (CDFG) (via CCID & SLCC) 875 2,089 1,660 629 382 192 375 430 3,655 3,266 931 556 15,040

Mendota Wildlife Area (CDFG) 2,296 1,170 1,093 875 1,441 1,283 2,731 3,003 4,698 5,301 2,619 2,771 29,281

Salt Slough Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 729 712 805 276 78 200 300 174 640 646 265 888 5,713

Freitas Unit (USFWS) (via CCID) 506 854 723 163 158 67 0 0 239 774 247 770 4,501

Kesterson (USFWS) (via CCID) 524 289 257 76 193 19 0 44 500 898 240 852 3,892

San Luis NWR (USFWS) (via SLCC) 0 6,557 0 0 2,500 2,500 0 2,986 3,850 5,187 4,947 0 28,527

0

Total 6,559 13,235 5,822 2,890 8,487 5,883 3,996 8,891 25,070 30,477 13,550 9,214 134,074

Total Deliveries 14,993 26,649 39,454 61,708 77,162 121,507 142,054 128,511 83,044 61,837 46,649 15,785 819,353

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
#### Cranford Company, Inc., Respondent, v. L. Leopold & Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and United States of America, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [189 Mise. 388.] [See *post,*p. 846.]
#### § 725.462 Withdrawal of controversion of issues set for formal hearing; effect.

A party may, on the record, withdraw his or her controversion of any or all issues set for hearing. If a party withdraws his or her controversion of all issues, the administrative law judge shall remand the case to the district director for the issuance of an appropriate order.
January 2023

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION** PRECIP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

551.5

1 2,194.45 555.2 3.7 2,203 313 0 0 5 0.03 0.00

2 2,194.86 557.6 2.4 1,522 309 0 0 3 0.02 0.00

3 2,195.19 559.6 1.9 1,292 313 0 0 0 0.00 0.12

4 2,195.92 563.9 4.3 2,485 311 0 0 2 0.01 0.18

5 2,198.33 578.3 14.4 7,577 312 0 0 0 0.00 1.93

6 2,199.61 586.0 7.8 3,921 0 0 0 7 0.04 0.19

7 2,201.58 598.1 12.1 6,430 334 0 0 0 0.00 0.95

8 2,204.00 613.2 15.1 7,685 90 0 0 0 0.00 2.02

9 2,206.97 632.0 18.8 9,491 0 0 0 0 0.00 1.20

10 2,208.65 642.8 10.8 5,712 239 0 0 21 0.11 0.50

11 2,210.23 653.1 10.3 5,304 117 0 0 6 0.03 0.67

12 2,211.82 663.6 10.5 5,398 112 0 0 6 0.03 1.12

13 2,214.39 680.8 17.2 8,759 58 0 0 4 0.02 0.36

14 2,217.72 703.8 22.9 11,574 0 0 0 8 0.04 1.15

15 2,219.77 718.2 14.5 7,295 0 0 0 4 0.02 0.33

16 2,220.93 726.5 8.3 4,394 217 0 0 0 0.00 0.04

17 2,221.72 732.2 5.7 3,097 223 0 0 8 0.04 0.00

18 2,222.39 737.0 4.8 2,607 165 0 0 2 0.01 0.00

19 2,222.92 740.9 3.8 2,100 165 0 0 0 0.00 0.49

20 2,223.28 743.5 2.6 1,660 340 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

21 2,223.61 745.9 2.4 1,548 332 0 0 4 0.02 0.00

22 2,223.91 748.1 2.2 1,327 216 0 0 9 0.04 0.00

23 2,224.21 750.3 2.2 1,357 244 0 0 6 0.03 0.00

24 2,224.50 752.4 2.1 1,300 219 0 0 9 0.04 0.00

25 2,224.72 754.0 1.6 1,210 393 0 0 4 0.02 0.00

26 2,224.96 755.8 1.8 1,163 274 0 0 2 0.01 0.00

27 2,225.19 757.5 1.7 1,159 299 0 0 6 0.03 0.00

28 2,225.47 759.5 2.1 1,343 294 0 0 7 0.03 0.00

29 2,225.70 761.2 1.7 1,186 320 0 0 11 0.05 0.00

30 2,225.90 762.7 1.5 1,059 315 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

31 2,226.10 764.2 1.5 1,072 326 0 0 0 0.00 0.00

TOTALS 212.7 114,230 6,850 0 0 134 0.67 11.25

ACRE-FEET 212,700 226,575 13,587 0 0 266

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 ** Evaporation and precipitation records taken from station at Trinity River Hatchery.

Precipitation

This month = 11.25

October 01, 2022 To date = 22.55

SUMMARY 

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 13,587 Outlet 0

Spill 0

Total 13586.975

Historical Archive and Report Database

Trinity Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/28/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-50764

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FLORENCE MONROE LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:11-CR-104-3

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Florence Monroe Lopez, federal prisoner # 79440-280, was convicted in 

2011 of a drug conspiracy and sentenced to 168 months of imprisonment. He 

filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a sentence reduction based 

on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines; the district 

court denied the motion, and this court dismissed Lopez’s appeal as frivolous. 

Lopez then filed a second Section 3582(c)(2) motion based on Amendment 782, 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 31, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 18-50764 Document: 00515181897 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2019
No. 18-50764

2

which the district court also denied. He now appeals the denial of that second 

motion. We affirm.

We review the denial of Lopez’s Section 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of 

discretion. United States v. Henderson, 636 F.3d 713, 717 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Because we can determine from the record that the district court implicitly 

considered Lopez’s Section 3582(c)(2) motion and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors, his challenge to the sufficiency of the district court’s 

explanation is unpersuasive. See id. at 718. His argument that a reduction 

was warranted in light of the Section 3553(a) factors, which include his 

postsentencing conduct, is insufficient to demonstrate an abuse of discretion. 

See id. at 717; United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 673 & nn.9–10 (5th Cir.

2009). Finally, Lopez cites no authority in support of his argument that the 

district court was required to prepare a new presentence report.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 18-50764 Document: 00515181897 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2019
### §4071g. Cost-of-living adjustments

Cost-of-living adjustments for annuitants under this System shall be granted under procedures in section 8462 of title 5 in the same manner as such adjustments are made for annuitants referred to in subsection (c)(3)(B)(ii) of such section.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §858, as added Pub. L. 99–335, title IV, §415, June 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 619.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Delay in Cost-of-Living Adjustments During Fiscal Years 1994, 1995, and 1996

Any cost-of-living increase scheduled to take effect during fiscal year 1994, 1995, or 1996 under this section delayed until first day of third calendar month after date such increase would otherwise take effect, see section 11001 of Pub. L. 103–66, set out as a note under section 8340 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.