alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21432]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Molecular Basis of Teratospermia 
in Feline Models.
    Date: October 5, 2004.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone conference call).
    Contact Person: Jon M. Ranhand, PhD, Scientist Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6884; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a3d1c2cdcbc2cdc7c9e3cec2cacf8dcdcacb8dc4ccd5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cdbfaca3a5aca3a9a78da0aca4a1e3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-21432 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              WASHINGTON, DC 20549

                                   ----------

                                    Form 8-K

                                 Current Report
                         Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                                  April 5, 2000
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

                                   ----------

                              eVentures Group, Inc.
               (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

                                   ----------


   Delaware                         33-19435                        75-2233445
---------------                    -----------                   ---------------
(State or Other                    (Commission                   (IRS Employer
Juris. of                          File Number)                  Identification
Incorporation)                                                   No.)


                         300 Crescent Court, Suite 800
                              Dallas, Texas 75201
                          -----------------------------
                              (Address of Principal
                               Executive Offices)


                                  214-777-4100
                                 ---------------
                         (Registrant's telephone number
                              including area code)

                               One Evertrust Plaza
                                    8th Floor
                          Jersey City, New Jersey 07302
                      -------------------------------------
                         (Former Name or Former Address,
                          if Changed Since Last Report)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>
Item 7  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits

         (c)   Exhibits

               99.1   Press Release dated April 5, 2000.

<PAGE>
                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended,  the  registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


Date:  April 6, 2000                        eVentures Group, Inc.


                                            By: /s/ Stuart Chasanoff
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Name:   Stuart Chasanoff
                                               Title:  Senior Vice President,
                                                       Corporate Development and
                                                       Legal Affairs
**EXHIBIT32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AdvancedBioEnergy, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Revis L. Stephenson III, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|          |   | /s/ Revis L. Stephenson III |
|----------|--------|-----------------------------|
|     |   | Revis L. Stephenson III     |
| * * |   | *Chief Executive Officer*   |
|     |   | December 29, 2006           |

 

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eduardo SAENZ, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-40573.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Eduardo Saenz pleaded guilty to transporting an undocumented alien for purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain within the United States by means of a motor vehicle. Saenz was sentenced to a 44-month term of imprisonment and to a three-year period of supervised release. Saenz gave timely notice of his appeal.

Saenz’s offense occurred prior to the decision in *United States v. Booker,*543 *291U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and he was sentenced after *Booker*was decided. Saenz argues that, although he is entitled *to*retroactive application of *Booker’s*Sixth Amendment holding, the remedial portion of *Booker’s*holding, which made the Sentencing Guidelines advisory, may not be applied in his case without violating the Due Process and Ex Post Facto Clauses of the Constitution. Saenz thus argues that the district court should have applied the sentencing guidelines as mandatory in his case but should not have enhanced his sentence based on facts that were not charged in the indictment and were neither admitted by him nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. As Saenz concedes, this question is foreclosed. *See United States v. Austin,*432 F.3d 598, 599-600 (5th Cir.2005); *United States v. Scroggins,*411 F.3d 572, 575-76 (5th Cir.2005). He has raised the issue to preserve it for further review. The judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 828.56

 827.92

 827.28

 826.63

 826.02

 825.34

 824.68

 824.04

 823.33

 822.78

 822.39

 821.90

 821.65

 821.32

 820.98

 820.63

 820.00

 819.64

 819.43

 819.02

 818.60

 818.15

 818.13

 818.29

 818.56

 818.86

 819.15

 819.43

 819.72

 820.22

 820.28

 35.64

 34.96

 34.29

 33.61

 32.98

 32.29

 31.62

 30.98

 30.29

 29.75

 29.38

 28.91

 28.67

 28.36

 28.04

 27.72

 27.13

 26.81

 26.62

 26.25

 25.87

 25.47

 25.45

 25.60

 25.84

 26.10

 26.36

 26.62

 26.88

 27.34

 27.39

STORAGE

-0.65

-0.68

-0.67

-0.68

-0.63

-0.69

-0.67

-0.64

-0.70

-0.54

-0.38

-0.47

-0.24

-0.31

-0.32

-0.32

-0.58

-0.33

-0.19

-0.37

-0.37

-0.40

-0.02

+0.14

+0.24

+0.27

+0.26

+0.25

+0.26

+0.46

+0.06

CHANGE

15

-5

-3

-9

14

-19

-7

10

-22

57

137

89

202

162

157

150

19

148

128

129

129

114

152

164

183

172

159

157

161

258

54

INFLOW

 5

 5

 5

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 320

 318

 315

 316

 315

 313

 311

 311

 311

 308

 307

 306

 305

 305

 303

 300

 300

 300

 213

 304

 303

 302

 150

 80

 50

 25

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 15

 17

 16

 14

 14

 14

 14

 18

 15

 16

 16

 16

 13

 14

 15

 13

 13

 13

 11

 13

 15

 14

 11

 12

 12

 12

 13

 14

 13

 12

 11

C.F.S.

 .45

 .51

 .47

 .43

 .43

 .44

 .45

 .55

 .49

 .51

 .53

 .53

 .41

 .47

 .50

 .42

 .45

 .45

 .39

 .44

 .51

 .48

 .40

 .42

 .41

 .42

 .44

 .48

 .45

 .40

 .38

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2002 RUN DATE: 08/20/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -8.91 3,055 7,066 45 429 14.11 .00

ACRE-FEET -8,910 6,060 14,015 89 851

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 89

OUTLET

TOTAL

 14,015

 14,104

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2002 .00

 36.29

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### North American Instrument Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Monarch Sales Co., Inc., Appellant.

On the facts disclosed in this record we hold that the check was given and received in part payment of the purchase price of the merchandise at the time the check was delivered by defendant’s president and the finding of the trial court to the contrary is reversed (see *Ablett Go. V. Sencer,*130 Mise. 416, 418). Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 996.]
Document

Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT 1 TO EMPLOYMENT


This first amendment (“Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement with the effective date of January 2, 2020 (“Agreement”) by and between Aviat Networks, Inc. (“Aviat”) and Peter Smith ("Smith") is entered into effective May 17, 2021 (the “Effective Date”).


For valuable consideration, including the promises and covenants provided in this Amendment, Aviat and Smith agree as follows:


1.     Section 3(a), “Salary”, is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence of that section and replacing it with the following: 


    “Effective on January 4, 2021, you will be paid a base salary of $500,000 per year (“Base Salary”), less applicable taxes and withholdings, in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll procedures and applicable law.”  
  


2.     Section 4(c), “Relocation”, is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the section 4(c): 


    “The Company will also reimburse you for storage of your household goods due to the relocation to Austin for up to six months.”  


3.     Section 5(g), “Termination or Resignation For Good Reason Following a Change of Control”, is here by amended by deleting the following sentence from the section: 


    “The total cash compensation pursuant to this section shall not exceed $750,000.” 


Except as specifically provided for in this Amendment, all terms of the Agreement shall otherwise remain in full force and effect as they were prior to execution of this Amendment, and this Amendment shall be read as if it were part of the Agreement. 






Aviat Networks, Inc.                Peter Smith


By: _/s/ Eric Chang ________        By:  _/s/ Peter A. Smith_________


Name:  Eric Chang                Name: Peter Smith
Title: Chief Financial Officer            Title: President & Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 17, 2021                Date: May 17, 2021
Page 1 of 1
### §1643. Amount and use of funds reimbursed through medicare and medicaid available to Indian Health Service

The Secretary shall submit to the President, for inclusion in the report required to be transmitted to the Congress under section 1671 of this title, an accounting on the amount and use of funds made available to the Service pursuant to this subchapter as a result of reimbursements through titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act, as amended [42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq., 1396 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 94–437, title IV, §403, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1410; Pub. L. 102–573, title IV, §402, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4566.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Social Security Act, referred to in text, is act Aug. 14, 1935, ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620. Titles XVIII and XIX of the Act are classified generally to subchapters XVIII (§1395 et seq.) and XIX (§1396 et seq.) of chapter 7 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1305 of Title 42 and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly set out as a note under section 1671 of this title.

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–573 substituted "The Secretary shall submit to the President, for inclusion in the report required to be transmitted to the Congress under section 1671 of this title," for "The Secretary shall include in his annual report required by section 1671 of this title".
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Uniwell Electronic Corporation., on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and July 31, 2011 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Uniwell Electronic Corporation.





|                  |     |                                                               | 
|----------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|September 5, 2013 | By: | /s/ Luiz Brasil                                               | 
|                  |     | Luiz Brasil                                                   | 
|                  |     | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer               | 
|                  |     | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 2, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00460

- CR

Victor RIGGAN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR171328

Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On July 27, 2018, appellant filed a response to our order dated July 20, 2018, stating

payment has been made for the reporter’s record. The reporter’s r ecord is due on or before

September 4, 2018

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
OMB No. 2060

- 0336, Approval Expires 0 6 /30/201 5



### Federal Operating Permit Progra m (40 CFR Part 71)

FEE CALCULATION WORKSHEET (FEE)

Fees will be submitted after consultation with EPA Region 4.

A. General Information

Type of fee (Check one): _ X __Initial ___Annual

Deadline for submitting fee calculation worksheet __ NA __/__ __/_______

For initial fees, emissions are based on (Check one):

___ Actual emissions for the preceding calendar year

. (Required in most c ircumstances

. )

___ Estimates of actual emissions for the current calendar year

. (Required whe n operations c ommenced during the preceding calendar year .)

D ate commenced operations ____/____/______

___ Estimates of actual emissions for the preceding calendar year

. (Optional after a part

71 permit was issued to replace a part 70 permit

, but only if i nitial fee payment is

due b etween J a nuary 1 and March 31 ; otherwise use actual emissions for the

preceding calendar year

. )

F or annual fee payment, you are required to us e actual emissions for the preceding calendar year

.
§ 11.93 Post-assessment phase—restoration plan. ( a ) Upon determination of the amount of the award of a natural resource damage claim as authorized by section 107(a)(4)(C) of CERCLA, or sections 311(f)(4) and 311(f)(5) of the CWA, the authorized official shall prepare a Restoration Plan as provided in section 111(i) of CERCLA. The plan shall be based upon the Restoration and Compensation Determination Plan described in §§ 11.81 of this part. The Plan shall describe how the monies will be used to address natural resources, specifically what restoration, rehabilitation, replacement, or acquisition of the equivalent resources will occur. When damages for compensable value have been awarded, the Plan shall also describe how monies will be used to address the services that are lost to the public until restoration, rehabilitation, replacement, and/or acquisition of equivalent resources is completed. The Restoration Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the guidance set forth in § 11.81 of this part.
( b ) No restoration activities shall be conducted by Federal agencies that would incur ongoing expenses in excess of those that would have been incurred under baseline conditions and that cannot be funded by the amount included in the separate account established pursuant to § 11.92(a) of this part unless such additional monies are appropriated through the normal appropriations process.
( c ) Modifications may be made to the Restoration Plan as become necessary as the restoration proceeds. Significant modifications shall be made available for review by any responsible party, any affected natural resource trustees, other affected Federal or State agencies or Indian tribes, and any other interested members of the public for a period of at least 30 days, with reasonable extensions granted as appropriate, before tasks called for in the modified plan are begun.
( d ) If the measure of damages was determined in accordance with subpart D, the restoration plan may describe actions to be taken that are to be financed from more than one damage award, so long as the actions are intended to address the same or similar resource injuries as those identified in each of the subpart D assessment procedures that were the basis of the awards.
[51 FR 27725, Aug. 1, 1986, as amended at 52 FR 9100, Mar. 20, 1987; 53 FR 5176, Feb. 22, 1988; 59 FR 14287, Mar. 25, 1994]
#### David Gross, Respondent, v, Ida Gross, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Ida Gross, Appellant, v. David Gross, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

—Action No. 1, by plaintiff husband, seeking an absolute divorce, was consolidated and tried with Action No. 2, wherein his wife sued for separation. Interlocutory judgment awarding plaintiff in Action No. 1 a judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties, and dismissing the complaint of plaintiff in Action No. 2, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
### §14a. Deposit of grant funds received by Bureau from other Federal agencies

On and after October 12, 1984, moneys received by grant to the Bureau of Indian Affairs from other Federal agencies to carry out various programs for elementary and secondary education, handicapped programs, bilingual education, and other specific programs shall be deposited into the appropriation account available for the operation of Bureau schools during the period covered by the grant and shall remain available as otherwise provided by law.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(c) [title I, §100], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1837, 1848.)
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57364]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Bureau of Prisons


Annual Determination of Average Cost of Incarceration

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal 
inmates in 2003 was $23,181.

Dates: Effective September 24, 2004.

ADDRESSES: Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 
First St., NW., Washington, DC 20534.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Qureshi, (202) 307-2105.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 28 CFR part 505 allows for assessment and 
collection of a fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for 
Federal inmates. We calculate this fee by dividing the number 
representing Bureau facilities' monetary obligation (excluding 
activation costs) by the number of inmate-days incurred for the 
preceding fiscal year, and then by multiplying the quotient by 365.
    Under Sec.  505.2, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons determined 
that, based upon fiscal year 2003 data, the fee to cover the average 
cost of incarceration for Federal inmates in 2003 was $23,181.

Harley G. Lappin,
Director, Bureau of Prisons.
[FR Doc. 04-21423 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-05-P