alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

                                    FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                           For the month of March 2006

                         Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                          Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456
                       (C1038AAJ) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                    Form 20-F [X]       Form 40-F [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                    Yes [ ]             No [X]

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

================================================================================

<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

MONTH FILED              EVENT AND SUMMARY                   EXHIBIT NO.
------------   ------------------------------------------   -------------
March 2006     Financial  statements of the Registrant           99.1
               for the fiscal year ended December 31,
               2005 presented in comparative format

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                      GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A. (Registrant)


Date: March 1, 2006                   By: /s/ Antonio Garces
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Name: Antonio Garces
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of J. Allen Greer,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                  ---------------------------
Date: October 31, 2003                                Kevin Ericksteen
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
#### John A. Holloway, Respondent, v. The City of Moberly, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

July 6, 1885.

Affirmance. — The only errors complained of are as to matter of evidence and instructions given by the court. These are matters -which can only be brought to the attention of this court by being preserved in the bill of exceptions." Here, there is no bill of exceptions in contemplation of law. Neither is any abstract of the record filed. There are no errors in the record proper.

Appeal from Audrain Circuit Court, Hon. Elijah Robinson, J.

*Affirmed.*

W. B. Sanford, for the appellant.

Hollis & Wiley, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Philips, P. J.

This is an action to recover damages against the city *554of Moberly, a municipal corporation, for the injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff, on account of defendant’s neglect to keep its streets in repair.

The plaintiff recovered judgment for five hundred dollars, from which the defendant appealed.

The only errors complained of here are as to matters of evidence and instructions given by the court. These are matters which can only be brought to the attention of this court by being preserved in the bill of exceptions. The record shows that the defendant, instead of filing its bill of exceptions in term time, took leave to file it in vacation, and within thirty days from the tenth day of July, 1888. The record shows that the bill of exceptions was not filed until the tenth day of August, 1883. The statute (section 3126, Revised Statutes), prescribes, that “the time within which an act is to be done shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last — if the last be Sunday it shall be excluded.”

It is, therefore, apparent that the defendant did not file its bill of exceptions within the thirty days prescribed ; and it being in vacation, it stands as no bill of exceptions, in contemplation of law. *Ellis*v. *Andrews,*25 Mo. 327; *Hoffman v.*Frank, 52 Mo. 542: *The Eau Claire Co. v. Howard,*76 Mo. 517.

In addition to this, the appellant has failed to comply with the rules of this court in filing an abstract of the record. Its whole complaint, as just stated, goes to matters of evidence and the instructions, and yet, in what purports to be an abstract, not a word of evidence or a single instruction is given.

Perceiving no errors in the record proper before us, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

All concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,351.05

 2,351.01

 2,350.97

 2,350.92

 2,350.85

 2,350.75

 2,350.66

 2,350.55

 2,350.42

 2,350.30

 2,350.20

 2,350.12

 2,350.04

 2,349.98

 2,349.92

 2,349.85

 2,349.78

 2,349.72

 2,349.65

 2,349.45

 2,349.25

 2,349.05

 2,348.84

 2,348.65

 2,348.51

 2,348.38

 2,348.20

 2,348.03

 2,347.87

 2,347.72

 2,347.57

 2,149.7

 2,149.1

 2,148.5

 2,147.8

 2,146.7

 2,145.2

 2,143.8

 2,142.2

 2,140.2

 2,138.4

 2,136.9

 2,135.7

 2,134.5

 2,133.6

 2,132.7

 2,131.6

 2,130.6

 2,129.7

 2,128.6

 2,125.6

 2,122.6

 2,119.6

 2,116.5

 2,113.6

 2,111.6

 2,109.6

 2,106.9

 2,104.4

 2,102.0

 2,099.8

 2,097.5

STORAGE

+0.0

-0.6

-0.6

-0.8

-1.1

-1.5

-1.4

-1.7

-2.0

-1.8

-1.5

-1.2

-1.2

-0.9

-0.9

-1.1

-1.1

-0.9

-1.1

-3.0

-3.0

-3.0

-3.1

-2.8

-2.1

-1.9

-2.7

-2.5

-2.4

-2.2

-2.2

CHANGE

2,628

2,341

2,314

2,329

2,186

1,954

1,830

1,863

1,624

1,769

1,229

1,474

1,398

1,441

1,172

1,096

1,089

1,521

1,345

471

385

154

353

242

727

827

478

471

523

549

668

INFLOW

 2,499

 2,491

 2,476

 2,562

 2,603

 2,576

 2,363

 2,584

 2,483

 2,548

 1,847

 1,954

 1,873

 1,772

 1,476

 1,484

 1,486

 1,838

 1,742

 1,835

 1,758

 1,584

 1,801

 1,521

 1,633

 1,658

 1,703

 1,604

 1,590

 1,544

 1,664

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 129

 155

 142

 147

 115

 138

 151

 115

 129

 133

 142

 128

 133

 124

 150

 142

 133

 137

 133

 150

 141

 84

 137

 154

 150

 150

 132

 149

 136

 132

 131

C.F.S.

 .29

 .35

 .32

 .33

 .26

 .31

 .34

 .26

 .29

 .30

 .32

 .29

 .30

 .28

 .34

 .32

 .30

 .31

 .30

 .34

 .32

 .19

 .31

 .35

 .34

 .34

 .30

 .34

 .31

 .30

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 6, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -52.3 38,451 60,552 0 0 4,222 9.55 .00

ACRE-FEET -52,300 76,268 120,105 0 0 8,374

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 120,105

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 120,105

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2005 .00

 2,149.7

Table 4

(1) (1)
### **CHAPTER 34—INDIAN CHILD PROTECTION AND FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION**

Sec.
3201.
Findings and purpose.
3202.
Definitions.
3203.
Reporting procedures.
3204.
Central registry.
3205.
Confidentiality.
3206.
Waiver of parental consent.
3207.
Character investigations.
3208.
Indian Child Abuse Treatment Grant Program.
3209.
Indian Child Resource and Family Services Centers.
3210.
Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Program.
3211.
Repealed.
================================================================================

                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             Date: February 9, 2007

                        Commission File Number: 001-32305

                                    CORPBANCA
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                         Huerfanos 1072, Santiago, Chile
                     ---------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                    Form 20-F [X]              Form 40-F [ ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                    Yes [ ]                    No [X]

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.

================================================================================
<PAGE>

     On February 8, 2007, Corpbanca published a notice in the Chilean newspaper
Diario Financiero containing Corpbanca's summary audited consolidated financial
statements for fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.

     A copy of the unofficial English language translation of the notice is
attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 9, 2007

                                                  CORPBANCA


                                                  By: /s/ Mario Chamorro Carrizo
                                                      --------------------------
                                                  Name:  Mario Chamorro Carrizo
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit   Description
-------   ----------------------------------------------------------------------

99.1      Unofficial English language translation of Corpbanca's notice of
          February 8, 2007, published in the Chilean newspaper Diario Financiero
          containing Corpbanca's summary audited consolidated financial
          statements for fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
#### § 2631.1 Applications.

Application, and supporting evidence, must be filed by the carrier in the proper office, accompanied by a nonrefundable application service charge of $10. The lands listed in any one application must be limited to those embraced in a single sale upon which the claim for patent is based. The application should state that it is filed under the railroad land grant act involved, properly cited, and subsection (b) of section 321, Part II, Title III of the Transportation Act of 1940 (54 Stat. 954). The application must be supported by a showing that the land is of the character which would pass under the grant involved, and was not by some superior or prior claim, withdrawal, reservation, or other reason, excluded from the operation of the grant. Full details of the alleged sale must be furnished, such as dates, the terms thereof, the estate involved, consideration, parties, amounts and dates of payments, made, and amounts due, if any, description of the land, and transfers of title. The use, occupancy, and cultivation of the land and the improvements placed thereon by the alleged purchaser should be described. All statements should be duly corroborated. Available documentary evidence, including the contract or deed, should be filed, which may be authenticated copies of the originals. An abstract of title may be necessary, dependent upon the circumstances of the particular case. No application for a patent under this act will be favorably considered unless it be shown that the alleged purchaser is entitled forthwith to the estate and interest transferred by such patent. Evidence of a recorded deed of conveyance from the carrier to the purchaser may be required. Where the company has on file an application in which the sold lands embraced, it need not file a new application, but may file a request for amendment of the pending application to come under the Transportation Act of 1940, together with the showing, supra, required as to the *bona fide* sale.
#### In the Matter of William Norris, as Committee of the Estate of Mabel B. Norris, an Incompetent Person, Respondent. Leo W. Huegle et al., Constituting The Christian Science Trustees for Gifts and Endowments, Appellants, Appearing Specially, and G. Ida Crawford, as Co-Committee of the Person of Mabel B. Norris, Appellant.

*883Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur. [180 Misc. 361.]
<PAGE>

                                LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                             Exhibit to Form 10 - Q

                    (For the six months ended June 30, 2004)

                             Exhibit Number (32(b))

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Corporation")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Terry M. White,
Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Terry M. White

Terry M. White
Chief Financial Officer
August 9, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Armkel, LLC (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maureen K. Usifer,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Armkel, LLC and will be retained by Armkel, LLC and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                     By:      /s/ Maureen K. Usifer
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:   Maureen K. Usifer
                                              Title:  Chief Financial Officer

                                     Dated:   March 27, 2003
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of Fiber Coating Composition on Mechanical Behavior of Silicon Carbide Fiber-Reinforced Celsian CompositesCelsian matrix composites reinforced with Hi-Nicalon fibers, precoated with a dual layer of BN/SiC by chemical vapor deposition in two separate batches, were fabricated. Mechanical properties of the composites were measured in three-point flexure. Despite supposedly identical processing, the composite panels fabricated with fibers coated in two batches exhibited substantially different mechanical behavior. The first matrix cracking stresses (sigma(sub mc)) of the composites reinforced with fibers coated in batch 1 and batch 2 were 436 and 122 MPa, respectively. This large difference in sigma(sub mc) was attributed to differences in fiber sliding stresses(tau(sub friction)), 121.2+/-48.7 and 10.4+/-3.1 MPa, respectively, for the two composites as determined by the fiber push-in method. Such a large difference in values of tau(sub friction) for the two composites was found to be due to the difference in the compositions of the interface coatings. Scanning Auger microprobe analysis revealed the presence of carbon layers between the fiber and BN, and also between the BN and SiC coatings in the composite showing lower tau(sub friction). This resulted in lower sigma(sub mc) in agreement with the ACK theory. The ultimate strengths of the two composites, 904 and 759 MPa, depended mainly on the fiber volume fraction and were not significantly effected by tau(sub friction) values, as expected. The poor reproducibility of the fiber coating composition between the two batches was judged to be the primary source of the large differences in performance of the two composites.Document ID19990017992Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBansal, Narottam P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Elderidge, Jeffrey I.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1998Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208832NASA/TM-1998-208832E-11443Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-21-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990017992.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 901.2 Eligibility to perform actuarial services. ( a ) *Enrolled actuary.* Subject to the standards of performance set forth in subpart C of this part, any individual who is an enrolled actuary as defined in § 901.1(g) may perform actuarial services required under ERISA or regulations thereunder. Where a corporation, partnership, or other entity is engaged to provide actuarial services, such services may be provided on its behalf only by an enrolled actuary who is an employee, partner or consultant.
( b ) *Government officers and employees.* No officer or employee of the United States in the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government, or in any agency of the United States, including the District of Columbia, may perform actuarial services required under ERISA or regulations thereunder if such services would be in violation of 18 U.S.C. 205. No Member of Congress or Resident Commissioner (elect or serving) may perform such actuarial services if such services would be in violation of 18 U.S.C. 203 or 205.
( c ) *Former government officers and employees* — ( 1 ) *Personal and substantial participation in the performance of actuarial services.* No former officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States Government, of any independent agency of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, shall perform actuarial services required under ERISA or regulations thereunder or aid or assist in the performance of such actuarial services, in regard to particular matters, involving a specific party or parties, in which the individual participated personally and substantially as such officer or employee.
( 2 ) *Official responsibility.* No former officer or employee of the executive branch of the United States Government, of any independent agency of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, shall, within 1 year after his employment has ceased, perform actuarial services required under ERISA or regulations thereunder in regard to any particular matter involving a specific party or parties which was under the individual's official responsibility as an officer or employee of the Government at any time within a period of 1 year prior to the termination of such responsibility.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Daniel

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Elk Migration Corridor

Pronghorn Migration Corridor

Mule Deer Migration Corridor

Big Game Migration Corridors

Map 3-16

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Source: Wyoming Game & Fish