alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies,  for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, in his capacity as an officer of the BFA Liquidation  Trust (the "TRUST"),
that, to his knowledge:

    (a)  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Trust for the fiscal  year ended
         December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission
         (the "REPORT"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (b)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Trust.

Date: March 29, 2005              By:      /s/ Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                           --------------------------
                                  Name:    Clifton R. Jessup, Jr.
                                  Title:   Liquidating Trustee

Date: March 29, 2005              By:      /s/ Mark A. Roberts
                                           -------------------
                                  Name:    Mark A. Roberts
                                  Title:    Assistant to the Liquidating Trustee

This certification is not deemed to be "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This  certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.


                                     - 35 -
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 499.35

 499.41

 499.68

 499.30

 498.89

 498.51

 498.79

 499.05

 499.30

 498.92

 499.16

 499.32

 498.96

 498.57

 498.95

 499.46

 499.74

 499.89

 500.13

 499.76

 499.74

 502.62

 502.48

 502.33

 502.07

 501.76

 501.43

 501.11

 500.94

 500.57

 500.47

 54,609

 54,673

 54,962

 54,556

 54,120

 53,721

 54,015

 54,289

 54,556

 54,152

 54,407

 54,577

 54,194

 53,784

 54,183

 54,727

 55,026

 55,186

 55,444

 55,047

 55,026

 58,184

 58,028

 57,860

 57,568

 57,225

 56,861

 56,508

 56,322

 55,921

 55,812

STORAGE

+320

+64

+289

-406

-436

-399

+294

+274

+267

-404

+255

+170

-383

-410

+399

+544

+299

+160

+258

-397

-21

+3,158

-156

-168

-292

-343

-364

-353

-186

-401

-109

CHANGE

363

256

367

17

0

20

367

359

357

17

349

311

30

12

419

492

370

299

346

17

207

1,811

144

135

71

45

35

39

126

19

161

INFLOW

 201

 222

 220

 219

 218

 219

 217

 219

 220

 220

 220

 221

 222

 218

 217

 217

 218

 216

 214

 216

 217

 219

 222

 217

 217

 217

 217

 216

 218

 220

 215

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 2

 1

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 0

 4

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 0

 1

 3

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 01/01/2016

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,523 7,561 6,749 0 0 46

ACRE-FEET +1,523 14,997 13,387 0 0 91

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 13,387

SPILL 0 13,387

 54,289

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 367

 256

 361

 21

 9

 25

 368

 366

 354

 9

 305

 304

 11

 12

 418

 486

 364

 310

 310

 10

 11

 25

 15

 11

 10

 10

 11

 12

 111

 10

 146

 5,038

 9,993

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,285.13

 2,285.32

 2,285.47

 2,285.60

 2,285.78

 2,285.98

 2,286.21

 2,286.38

 2,286.39

 2,286.52

 2,286.62

 2,286.64

 2,286.62

 2,286.60

 2,286.57

 2,286.41

 2,286.29

 2,286.29

 2,286.36

 2,286.55

 2,286.80

 2,286.76

 2,286.72

 2,286.82

 2,286.96

 2,286.90

 2,286.81

 2,286.42

 2,286.26

 2,286.26

 1,293.8

 1,295.9

 1,297.5

 1,298.9

 1,300.8

 1,303.0

 1,305.5

 1,307.4

 1,307.5

 1,308.9

 1,310.0

 1,310.2

 1,310.0

 1,309.8

 1,309.4

 1,307.7

 1,306.4

 1,306.4

 1,307.2

 1,309.2

 1,311.9

 1,311.5

 1,311.1

 1,312.2

 1,313.7

 1,313.0

 1,312.1

 1,307.8

 1,306.1

 1,306.1

STORAGE

+1.4

+2.1

+1.6

+1.4

+1.9

+2.2

+2.5

+1.9

+0.1

+1.4

+1.1

+0.2

-0.2

-0.2

-0.3

-1.7

-1.3

+0.0

+0.8

+2.1

+2.7

-0.4

-0.4

+1.1

+1.5

-0.7

-1.0

-4.2

-1.7

+0.0

CHANGE

1,106

1,463

1,512

1,467

1,630

1,643

1,815

1,806

1,774

1,748

1,865

1,658

1,630

1,541

1,446

1,394

1,563

1,622

1,889

2,006

1,941

1,881

1,719

1,865

1,899

1,293

1,218

1,146

1,711

1,857

INFLOW

 346

 373

 640

 675

 592

 501

 495

 808

 1,661

 970

 1,245

 1,481

 1,676

 1,580

 1,544

 1,535

 1,673

 1,370

 554

 0

 0

 0

 529

 1,252

 1,056

 1,587

 1,683

 1,695

 1,774

 1,790

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 689

 488

 169

 884

 866

 504

 2,014

 1,336

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,535

 742

 0

OUTLET

 51

 54

 54

 83

 57

 51

 58

 64

 58

 64

 71

 67

 64

 71

 67

 48

 61

 83

 67

 96

 64

 87

 74

 64

 74

 35

 29

 58

 74

 67

C.F.S.

 .16

 .17

 .17

 .26

 .18

 .16

 .18

 .20

 .18

 .20

 .22

 .21

 .20

 .22

 .21

 .15

 .19

 .26

 .21

 .30

 .20

 .27

 .23

 .20

 .23

 .11

 .09

 .18

 .23

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .09

 .33

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2021 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 12, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +13.9 49,108 31,085 0 9,227 1,915 5.98 .59

ACRE-FEET +13,900 97,406 61,657 0 18,302 3,798

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 61,657

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 18,302

 79,959

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .59

JULY 1, 2020 17.04

 1,292.4

Table 4

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 16.21
### §92. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–56, title XXII, §2202(66), June 17, 1957, 71 Stat. 162

Section, act June 28, 1902, ch. 1301, §1, 32 Stat. 472, prescribed qualifications of officers of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, and officers under Board of Managers thereof.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1958, see section 2301 of Pub. L. 85–56, title XXIII, June 17, 1957, 71 Stat. 172.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1
 RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
  Grantee:
    
    
    
    
    Grant Date:Address:
    
    
    
    
    Number of Shares:
 
    Grant of Restricted Stock
 Conditions
 Restrictions on Restricted Stock




---



##### 



Transferability
 Rights as a Shareholder
 Substitute Shares
 Registration
 Termination of Employee Status
 Termination Due to Disability or Death
 Retirement
 2




---



##### 



Termination for Reason Other Than Retirement, Disability or Death
  Employment by the Company
 Tax Withholding.
 Withhold
 Remit
 Acknowledgment
 Representation
 Taxes
 Limitation of Rights
 Employment
 3




---



##### 



Duties
 Commitments of Grantee
 Compete
 Customers
 Assist
 Employee Solicitation
 Confidentiality
  4




---



##### 



Cooperation
 Non-Disparagement
   Change in Control
 Purchase
 5




---



##### 



Adjust
 Change in Control Compensation Agreement or Employment Agreement
 Arbitration
 Rules
 Arbitrator
 Location
 Procedure
 Decision
 6




---



##### 



Power
  Governing Law
 Binding Effect and Amendment
 Remedies
 Agreement Controls
 
 KAYDON CORPORATION
    
    
    
    GRANTEEBy:Its:
    
    
    
    
    
    DATE:
 7
#### § 1864.0-1 Purpose.

The Secretary of the Interior has been granted discretionary authority by section 315 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1745) to issue recordable disclaimers of interests in lands. In general, a disclaimer may be issued if the disclaimer will help remove a cloud on the title to lands and there is a determination that such lands are not lands of the United States or that the United States does not hold a valid interest in the lands. These regulations implement this statutory authority of the Secretary.
Table 26

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary Data Subject to Change San Luis and Cross Valley Canals

2018

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

SAN LUIS CANAL

City of Avenal 144 145 147 176 221 242 254 237 244 217 192 156 2,375

City of Coalinga 748 647 554 439 450 585 1,529 1,509 855 634 431 735 9,116

City of Dos Palos 59 74 71 101 147 166 167 157 147 127 92 68 1,376

City of Huron 42 46 51 64 77 94 97 96 84 73 61 42 827

Pacheco WD 20 86 0 0 0 793 2,734 1,574 689 669 544 178 7,287

Pacheco CCID Non-project (Hamburg) 92 248 82 373 745 329 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,869

Panoche WD 1,206 3,290 777 2,828 4,416 4,288 4,926 3,480 1,718 2,055 697 106 29,787

San Luis WD 1,438 4,140 1,871 5,508 8,830 10,688 11,584 6,954 4,678 4,943 2,790 85 63,509

Westlands WD 46,418 91,311 16,279 41,838 81,230 114,322 126,765 91,049 53,179 41,456 25,533 7,955 737,335

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 4) 0 1 0 0 0 55 35 0 0 0 0 0 91

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kern National Wildlife Refuge (USFWS) 4,438 2,823 0 62 193 0 0 1,660 5,419 5,723 4,404 2,956 27,678

0

Total 54,605 102,811 19,832 51,389 96,309 131,562 148,091 106,716 67,013 55,897 34,744 12,281 881,250

O'NEILL FOREBAY DELIVERIES

O'Neill Forebay Wildlife 91 85 188 0 69 60 124 105 7 26 120 29 904

San Luis WD Ag 56 378 251 357 700 878 848 463 294 388 106 65 4,784

San Luis M&I 29 34 31 35 54 59 68 71 59 51 43 29 563

VA Cemetery 2 13 5 37 74 73 109 84 75 41 15 3 531

Total 178 510 475 429 897 1,070 1,149 723 435 506 284 126 6,782

CROSS VALLEY CANAL (See Notes 1 & 2 below)

County of Fresno 1,330 13,378 0 0 0 0 4,328 3,981 748 635 4,942 0 29,342

County of Tulare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 1,277 1,149 168 0 2,654

Lower Tule River ID 6,755 5,745 0 0 0 0 0 351 8,947 6,253 1,834 6,006 35,891

Pixley ID 8,043 5,559 0 0 0 0 0 351 7,657 6,552 991 0 29,153

Kern-Tulare WD 10,770 13,576 0 0 0 3,842 1,158 618 10,613 14,233 6,624 5,544 66,978

Hills-Valley ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 834 725 75 0 1,673

Tri-Valley ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 286 263 10 0 571

Total 26,898 38,258 0 0 0 3,842 5,486 5,412 30,362 29,810 14,644 11,550 166,262

SAN FELIPE DIVISION

Santa Clara (including Casa De Fruta) 489 3,184 9,959 16,914 18,395 10,746 9,871 9,094 5,748 11,273 7,226 4,789 107,688

San Benito 1,456 4,377 347 27 584 1,639 3,146 3,469 3,733 2,384 1,295 2,323 24,780

Total 1,945 7,561 10,306 16,941 18,979 12,385 13,017 12,563 9,481 13,657 8,521 7,112 132,468

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.

Note 1: Cross Valley Canal section represents delivereis on behalf of the contractors listed, not necessarily flows into the Cross Valley Canal.

Note 2: Cross Valley Canal section may include delivery of SJRRP Recapture water and/or water acquired from other CVP Contractor(s).
### §285f. Jurisdiction and venue of actions

For the purpose of any civil action which may be brought within the United States, its territories or possessions, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, by or against the Bank in accordance with the agreement, the Bank shall be deemed to be an inhabitant of the Federal judicial district in which its principal office or agency in the United States is located, and any such action to which the Bank shall be a party shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States, and the district courts of the United States, including the courts enumerated in section 460 of title 28, shall have original jurisdiction of any such action. When the Bank is a defendant in any action in a State court, it may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such action into the district court of the United States for the proper district by following the procedure for removal of causes otherwise provided by law.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §8, Mar. 16, 1966, 80 Stat. 72.)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHYAM K. CHETAL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR; 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-15837 

D.C. No. 3:18-cv-03731-EMC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Shyam K. Chetal appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment 

in his Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) action arising out of his requests for 

records from the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”). We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Animal Legal Def. Fund v. U.S. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-15837 

Food & Drug Admin., 836 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for the BLM because 

Chetal failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the BLM did 

not “conduct[ ] a search reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.” 

Hamdan v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 797 F.3d 759, 770 (9th Cir. 2015) (citation and 

internal quotation marks omitted); id. at 770-71 (requirements for demonstrating 

adequacy of search for documents in response to a FOIA request); see also Hajro 

v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Servs., 811 F.3d 1086, 1103 (9th Cir. 2016)

(after an agency produces all non-exempt documents, a FOIA claim is generally 

moot because the injury has been remedied).

We lack jurisdiction to consider the district court’s post-judgment order 

denying Chetal’s motion for sanctions because Chetal failed to file a new or 

amended notice of appeal from that order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(A); TAAG 

Linhas Aereas de Angola v. Transamerica Airlines, Inc., 915 F.2d 1351, 1354 (9th 

Cir. 1990).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Chetal’s motion for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 18) is denied.

Chetal’s request for sanctions and judicial notice, set forth in the reply brief,
3 19-15837 

is denied.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 23.3

1043 DP Amsterdam
P.O. box 58110
1040 HC Amsterdam
Telephone +31 (20) 5824000
Telefax +31 (20) 5824024

                                                                        Deloitte
                                                                        & Touche

Date                                                          Reference
December 29, 2000                                             L.J. van den Dries

Independent auditors' consent

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this  Registration  Statement of
Koninklijke  Ahold N.V.  on Form F-3 and Form S-3 of our report  dated  March 7,
2000 appearing in the annual report on Form 20-F of  Koninklijke  Ahold N.V. for
the year ended January 2, 2000.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts".


Amsterdam, The Netherlands

/s/  Deloitte & Touche, accountants














                 Deloitte & Touche Accountants is a Partnership
                      of private (professional) companies.

---------
Deloitte
Touche
Tohmatsu
---------
EXHIBIT 11  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE





In thousands of dollars, except per share data





Nine Months Ended September 30,


Three Months Ended September 30,2002


2001


2002


2001Numerator:Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
540,879


$
(778,427
)

$
212,514


$
(232,198
)Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle


(16,778,526
)










Net loss


(16,237,647
)


(778,427
)


212,514



(232,198
)Effect of dilutive securities:Convertible debt  2.625% issued in 1998


6,825



7,019
*


2,145



2,340
*Convertible debt  1.5% issued in 1999


6,525



6,975
*


1,875



2,325
*LYONS  1996 issue






(225
)*







*LYONS  1998 issue


3,591
*


3,426
*


1,212
*


1,156
*Less: Anti-dilutive items


(3,591
)


(17,195
)


(1,212
)


(5,821
)Numerator for net income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle per common share 
diluted

$
554,229


$
(778,427
)

$
216,534


$
(232,198
)Numerator for cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle per common share  diluted


(16,778,526
)










Numerator for net loss per common share  diluted


(16,224,297
)


(778,427
)


216,534



(232,198
)Denominator:Weighted average common shares


604,827



590,015



612,520



593,991Effect of dilutive securities:Stock options and common stock warrants


4,054



14,063
*  **


2,183



12,037
*  **Convertible debt  2.625% issued in 1998


9,023



9,282
*


8,515



9,282
*Convertible debt  1.5% issued in 1999


8,838



9,454
*


7,628



9,454
*LYONS  1996 issue






2,324
*  **







*  **LYONS  1998 issue


3,085
*


3,085
*


3,085
*


3,085
*Less: Anti-dilutive items


(3,085
)


(38,208
)


(3,085
)


(33,858
)Denominator for net income (loss) per common share  diluted


626,742



590,015



630,846



593,991Net income (loss) per common share:Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle  Basic

$
.89


$
(1.32
)

$
.35


$
(.39
)Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle  Basic

$
(27.74
)

$



$



$
Net income (loss)  Basic

$
(26.85
)

$
(1.32
)

$
.35


$
(.39
)Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle  Diluted

$
.88


$
(1.32
)

$
.34


$
(.39
)Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle  Diluted

$
(26.77
)

$



$



$
Net income (loss)  Diluted

$
(25.89
)

$
(1.32
)

$
.34


$
(.39
)


|* |  | Denotes items that are anti-dilutive to the calculation of earnings per share.
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|** |  | Denotes items that are dilutive to the calculation of the September 30, 2001 restatement of earnings per share required upon the adoption of FAS 142.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### SUBCHAPTER V—BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS LAW ENFORCEMENT
(No. 5865

#### Licata Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 3, 1972.*

Licata Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, *32Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Berlin, C.J.
(No. 907

Claimant awarded $2,500.00.)

#### Leslie Owens, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Respondeat *superior*— no *liability. Social justice and equity.*Although the State is not liable for injuries sustained by its employees in the discharge of their duty, yet an award may be made to such employee on the ground of social justice and equity.

W. St. John Wines, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; S. S. DuHamel, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Phillips

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a suit brought by Leslie Owens, claimaiit, for personal injuries received while in employment of the State and while in discharge of his duties as game warden of the State. The facts in the case are about as follows:

On October 31, 1924, claimant as fish and game warden of Illinois was ordered by W. J. Stratton, chief game and fish warden, to go to a cabin boat on the Illinois river near Glasto rd in Peoria county to investigate a violation of the fish and game laws of Illinois and in pursuance of said orders went to said boat and to the lodging place of one Mike Vegetta, whom he informed as to his business, stating who he, claimant was.

Then and there the said Vegetta made an assault upon claimant with a knife, and claimant was compelled to shoot him twice before he checked the attack.

Claimant threw up his arm to ward off the attack of Vegetta with the knife and shot himself through the left forearm; and a desperate struggle ensued and claimant shot a second time so that he discontinued the struggle, and was taken into custody, and claimant was forced to seek medical aid at once, at the hospital at Peoria for a good while and then removed to the Presbyterian Hospital at Chicago where his arm was operated upon again' and treated for a bad arm and wrist, all of which services cost him $500.00.

The court ordered that claimant be brought before the court for oral and physical examination. Mr. Owens and Mr. Stratton both came before the court and gave oral testimony to the above effect. They both state that claimant has practically lost use of left arm; and on demonstration it is shown *197to the court that he has little use of the arm. Mr. Stratton confirms all this in his oral evidence before the court. It is evident to the court that claimant, at time he received the injury, was in line of duty, in the employment of the State, acted in necessary self defense and accidentally without fault on his part, wounded himself. The Attorney General was present in court at the time of taking this evidence, and makes no objection to allowance of claim, although a demurrer is filed. Upon such hearing the court hereby awards claimant the sum of $2,500.00.