alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 2,326.71

 2,326.69

 2,326.73

 2,326.78

 2,326.81

 2,326.80

 2,326.92

 2,327.22

 2,327.49

 2,328.37

 2,329.26

 2,329.78

 2,330.15

 2,330.41

 2,330.66

 2,330.89

 2,331.11

 2,331.30

 2,331.39

 2,331.55

 2,331.96

 2,332.48

 2,332.77

 2,333.08

 2,333.34

 2,333.55

 2,333.75

 2,333.92

 1,800.8

 1,800.5

 1,801.0

 1,801.7

 1,802.1

 1,802.0

 1,803.6

 1,807.7

 1,811.3

 1,823.3

 1,835.4

 1,842.6

 1,847.6

 1,851.2

 1,854.6

 1,857.8

 1,860.8

 1,863.5

 1,864.7

 1,866.9

 1,872.6

 1,879.8

 1,883.8

 1,888.2

 1,891.8

 1,894.7

 1,897.5

 1,899.9

STORAGE

+0.3

-0.3

+0.5

+0.7

+0.4

-0.1

+1.6

+4.1

+3.7

+12.0

+12.1

+7.1

+5.1

+3.6

+3.4

+3.2

+3.0

+2.6

+1.2

+2.2

+5.7

+7.2

+4.0

+4.3

+3.6

+2.9

+2.8

+2.4

CHANGE

545

449

560

614

681

425

1,190

2,225

2,075

6,266

6,350

3,830

2,768

2,132

1,975

1,983

1,776

1,701

1,489

1,428

3,140

3,885

2,341

2,435

2,149

1,671

1,966

1,500

INFLOW

 392

 570

 275

 246

 461

 481

 353

 176

 228

 237

 228

 210

 210

 313

 230

 372

 222

 332

 862

 313

 274

 243

 309

 252

 310

 191

 545

 303

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 16

 16

 12

 28

 16

 12

 20

 0

 0

 0

 0

 32

 0

 16

 12

 16

 24

 45

 0

 0

 8

 0

 0

 8

 8

 0

 12

 0

C.F.S.

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .06

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .25

 .52

 .40

 .56

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .87

 .08

 .09

 .80

 .14

 .23

 .25

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 9, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +99.3 59,549 9,138 0 0 301 .75 4.62

ACRE-FEET +99,300 118,115 18,125 0 0 597

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 18,125

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 18,125

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.62

JULY 1, 2006 17.83

 1,800.5

(1) (1)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Watson & Taylor Ltd.-2
                    and is qualified in its entirety by
                    reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>                           0000737296
<NAME>                          P-B Watson & Taylor Ltd.-2
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          888,690

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   116,791

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,005,481

<PP&E>                          1,518,521

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,524,002

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           389,222

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      2,134,780

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,524,002

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0<F1>

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0<F1>

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0<F1>

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
<FN>
<F1>
Registrant adopted the liquidation basis of accounting 
on October 1, 1996, and, accordingly, does not reflect
Statement of Operations subsequent to 1996. See Note A
to the financial statements for further details.
</FN>

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               3
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       52
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    55
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      55
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               46
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                         (7)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        55
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    79
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       26
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     53
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 53
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        53
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.003


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 706.21

 706.24

 706.23

 706.33

 706.48

 706.65

 706.83

 707.01

 707.22

 708.34

 708.58

 708.96

 709.18

 709.36

 709.56

 707.63

 707.83

 708.14

 709.99

 710.36

 710.52

 710.63

 710.73

 710.82

 710.89

 710.98

 708.34

 707.22

 707.40

 707.56

 707.71

 756

 756

 756

 759

 763

 768

 772

 777

 783

 815

 821

 832

 838

 843

 849

 795

 800

 809

 861

 872

 877

 880

 883

 886

 888

 890

 815

 783

 788

 793

 797

STORAGE

+1

+0

+0

+3

+4

+5

+4

+5

+6

+32

+6

+11

+6

+5

+6

-54

+5

+9

+52

+11

+5

+3

+3

+3

+2

+2

-75

-32

+5

+5

+4

CHANGE

2

1

1

3

3

4

3

4

4

17

4

7

4

4

4

-14

4

6

27

7

4

3

3

3

2

2

-19

-9

4

4

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 13

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 19

 7

 1

 1

 1

 0950

 1030

 1045

 0955

 1015

TIME

 .34

 .35

 .32

 .28

 .28

COPPER

 1.02

 1.01

 .97

 .92

 .94

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2008

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +42 95 0 67

ACRE-FEET +42 188 0 133

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 133

 133

 755

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

Table 7
Table 29
                                       U. S. Department of the Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                               Central Valley Operations Office

                                       Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley - Streamflow Data
                                                         2001
Mean monthly flow in cfs

                                   Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr     May     Jun     Jul     Aug     Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec
Sacramento River

Shasta computed inflow             5500   10062   10492    7140    5844    4368    4115    3712    3349    3306    6324   13724
At Keswick                         3997    3328    4468    6251    9914   13568   14725   11049    8475    6022    4603    3760
At Bend Bridge                     6912    8223    9597    7545    9965   13473   14857   10996    8583    6584    7148   12925
At Vina Bridge                     7839   10583   12086    7194    8906   12229   13663    9774    7509    5755    6852   15423
At Ord Ferry                       9005   13283   15632    7442    4854    8239   10007    9196    4801    2176    4017   16468
At Colusa                          8068   11914   14020    7551    6931    9162   10510    8100    7334    4316    6232   16678
Below Wilkins Slough               9068   12195   14024    7368    5814    8148    9619    7236    7445    4841    6701   16696
At Verona                         15056   18700   22301   10658    7428   10363   13353   12319   11211    7106   11045   24297
Sacramento at "I" Street          17104   19816   24037   12154    8813   12356   14901   13392   12485    8369   12036   25461


Miscellaneous Stations

Folsom computed inflow             1467    2126    2896    2896    2608    1043     946     950     790     260     709    2734
American R at Nimbus Dam           2064    1508    1499    1635    1812    2509    2086    1529    1501    1345    1004    1466
Kings River at Pine Flat            103     104     352     408    2142    6119    5238    1903     457     142     104     132


San Joaquin River

At Friant Dam                       136      97      89     120     152     269     226     264     338     198     135     118
Near Vernalis                      2414    3281    3694    3399    3967    1932    1754    1667    1706    2256    2334    2310


Putah Creek

Berryessa computed inflow           315    1399     819     121      63     -23     -32      -6     -35    -202     293    1938
Putah Creek - Lake Solano            25      53      63      46      43      43      43      35      26      24      36      69


Stanislaus River

New Melones computed inflow         471     629     914    1270    1454     754     686     601     470     424     433     991
At Tulloch Dam                      326     295     604    1955    2640    2227    2090    1883    1378     709     383     333
At Orange Blossom                   507     498     498     896     960     642     504     408     349     418     293     256

*  Data supplied by Central Valley Operations Coordinations Office
    Daily mean is derived from 7 am daily reading.
~~ NORTH DAKOTA 'IIIIIIII~ DEPARTMENT Of HEALTH

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SECTION

Gold Seal Center, 918 E. Divide Ave.

Bismarck, NO 58501-1947

701.328.5200 (fax)

www.ndhealth.gov

July 15,2009

John Graves, P.E.

Environmental Manager

Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.

1822 Mill Road

P.O. Box 13200

Grand Forks, ND 58208-3200

Re: Milton R. Young Station BACT Detennination

Dear Mr. Graves:

FILE

The Department has considered the additional infonnation Minnkota Power Cooperative, the

Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Justice through their consultant, Mr. Hans

Hartenstem, have submitted regarding the applicability ofselective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology

to the Milton R. Young Station. The Department recognizes the extremely technical nature ofthe issues

regarding SCR feasibility and the differing opinions ofthe technical experts involved with the project.

Based on the infonnation presented to date, we believe that low dust and tail end SCR are technically

feasible and have the potential for successful application at the Milton R. Young Station. Therefore, in

accordance with paragraph 65 of the Consent Decree, the Department asks that Minnkota Power

Cooperative submit an economic analysis· and other infonnation required by Steps 3 and 4 of the top

down BACT process for low dust and tail end SCR application at the Milton R. Young Station. The

additional infonnation should be submitted within 90 days ofreceipt ofthis letter.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.

~6d; Terry L. O'Clair, P.E.

Director

Division of Air Quality

TLO/TB:csc

xc: Dave Glatt

Maggie Olson

Ron Rutherford, EPA

Environmental Health

Section Chiefs Office

701.328.5150

Division of

Air Quality

701.328.5188

Division of

Municipal Facilities

701.328.5211

Printed on recycled paper.

Division of

Waste Management

701.328.5166

Division of

Water Quality

701.328.5210
### §1271. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–295, §1, May 16, 1972, 86 Stat. 139, which authorized the tribal governing body to use the judgment funds, after payment of attorney fees and other litigation expenses, for any purpose approved by the Secretary of the Interior, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 840.48

 840.43

 840.36

 840.36

 840.32

 840.28

 840.22

 840.17

 840.12

 840.08

 840.03

 839.97

 839.90

 839.92

 839.73

 839.64

 839.54

 839.20

 838.88

 838.58

 838.24

 837.76

 837.43

 837.21

 837.17

 837.11

 837.07

 837.00

 836.96

 836.92

 836.84

 49.71

 49.65

 49.56

 49.56

 49.51

 49.46

 49.38

 49.31

 49.25

 49.20

 49.13

 49.06

 48.97

 48.99

 48.75

 48.64

 48.51

 48.08

 47.67

 47.30

 46.87

 46.27

 45.87

 45.60

 45.55

 45.47

 45.42

 45.34

 45.29

 45.24

 45.14

STORAGE

-0.08

-0.07

-0.09

+0.00

-0.05

-0.05

-0.08

-0.07

-0.06

-0.05

-0.06

-0.08

-0.09

+0.03

-0.24

-0.12

-0.13

-0.43

-0.40

-0.38

-0.43

-0.60

-0.41

-0.27

-0.05

-0.07

-0.05

-0.09

-0.05

-0.05

-0.10

CHANGE

79

78

72

109

86

91

81

86

86

92

84

78

70

130

-4

59

52

22

36

50

28

-58

40

105

216

204

217

196

218

218

190

INFLOW

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

SPILL

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 90

 89

 89

 89

 89

 213

 213

 213

 213

 213

 213

 212

 212

 212

 212

 212

 212

 212

 210

OUTLET

 13

 6

 12

 4

 7

 12

 15

 14

 13

 13

 11

 12

 10

 13

 14

 13

 12

 12

 12

 12

 15

 15

 17

 15

 14

 14

 15

 12

 16

 15

 14

C.F.S.

 .32

 .15

 .30

 .11

 .17

 .30

 .37

 .34

 .33

 .32

 .27

 .30

 .24

 .33

 .35

 .33

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .37

 .39

 .44

 .38

 .36

 .35

 .39

 .32

 .40

 .39

 .35

INCHES

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .34

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MAY 2007 RUN DATE: 06/26/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -4.67 3,011 4,498 465 392 9.87 .39

ACRE-FEET -4,670 5,972 8,922 922 778

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 922

OUTLET

TOTAL

 8,922

 9,844

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .39

JULY 1, 2006 10.64

 49.79

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,274.77

 2,274.69

 2,274.58

 2,274.46

 2,274.38

 2,274.27

 2,274.17

 2,274.09

 2,274.01

 2,273.93

 2,273.92

 2,273.87

 2,273.80

 2,273.71

 2,273.65

 2,273.57

 2,273.48

 2,273.41

 2,273.37

 2,273.30

 2,273.21

 2,273.12

 2,272.98

 2,272.84

 2,272.76

 2,272.71

 2,272.61

 2,272.56

 2,272.53

 2,272.46

 2,272.40

 1,185.9

 1,185.1

 1,184.0

 1,182.8

 1,182.0

 1,180.9

 1,179.9

 1,179.1

 1,178.3

 1,177.5

 1,177.4

 1,176.9

 1,176.2

 1,175.3

 1,174.7

 1,173.9

 1,173.0

 1,172.3

 1,171.9

 1,171.2

 1,170.3

 1,169.4

 1,168.0

 1,166.6

 1,165.8

 1,165.3

 1,164.3

 1,163.8

 1,163.5

 1,162.8

 1,162.2

STORAGE

-0.8

-0.8

-1.1

-1.2

-0.8

-1.1

-1.0

-0.8

-0.8

-0.8

-0.1

-0.5

-0.7

-0.9

-0.6

-0.8

-0.9

-0.7

-0.4

-0.7

-0.9

-0.9

-1.4

-1.4

-0.8

-0.5

-1.0

-0.5

-0.3

-0.7

-0.6

CHANGE

101

215

107

191

43

55

179

0

164

111

313

182

187

109

92

163

137

134

109

164

103

126

313

12

12

117

91

193

350

256

124

INFLOW

 506

 617

 662

 793

 445

 609

 662

 396

 566

 511

 357

 422

 527

 556

 391

 560

 581

 486

 298

 507

 550

 564

 1,014

 698

 412

 367

 576

 425

 497

 600

 412

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 3

 3

 6

 3

 3

 24

 9

 3

 3

 6

 12

 12

 6

 3

 6

 9

 0

 12

 9

 6

 15

 3

 15

 0

 0

 15

 18

 3

 6

 12

C.F.S.

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .08

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .01

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .06

 .01

 .02

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .12

 .30

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .31

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2014 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 27, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -24.5 4,453 16,567 0 0 225 .75 .83

ACRE-FEET -24,500 8,833 32,861 0 0 446

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 32,861

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 32,861

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .83

JULY 1, 2013 3.88

 1,186.7

Table 4

(1) (1)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCompute as Fast as the Engineers Can Think! ULTRAFAST COMPUTING TEAM FINAL REPORTThis report documents findings and recommendations by the Ultrafast Computing Team (UCT). In the period 10-12/98, UCT reviewed design case scenarios for a supersonic transport and a reusable launch vehicle to derive computing requirements necessary for support of a design process with efficiency so radically improved that human thought rather than the computer paces the process. Assessment of the present computing capability against the above requirements indicated a need for further improvement in computing speed by several orders of magnitude to reduce time to solution from tens of hours to seconds in major applications. Evaluation of the trends in computer technology revealed a potential to attain the postulated improvement by further increases of single processor performance combined with massively parallel processing in a heterogeneous environment. However, utilization of massively parallel processing to its full capability will require redevelopment of the engineering analysis and optimization methods, including invention of new paradigms. To that end UCT recommends initiation of a new activity at LaRC called Computational Engineering for development of new methods and tools geared to the new computer architectures in disciplines, their coordination, and validation and benefit demonstration through applications.Document ID20000004220Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBiedron, R. T.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Mehrotra, P.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Nelson, M. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Preston, M. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Rehder, J. J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Rogersm J. L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Rudy, D. H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Sobieski, J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Storaasli, O. O.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateSeptember 9, 1999Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1999-209715NAS 1.15:209715L-17891Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 509-10-31-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000004220.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Angela Ravaud v. Jean Ravaud.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J. Dore, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 507.]
#### § 685.540 How are funds allocated to grants funded by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act?

The allocation of funds will be based on the comparative merits of the applications, in accordance with criteria set forth in the FOA.
### SUBCHAPTER I—INDIAN REVOLVING LOAN FUND
#### Sterling Industries, Inc., v. Ball Bearing Pen Corporation et al.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 460.]
#### George J. Goldstein, Respondent, v. S. A. & K. Building, Inc., Appellant.

— Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies defendant’s motion for summary judgment in an action by a real estate broker to recover commissions.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.