alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# pennsylvania
**DEPARTMENT OF**  **ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **SECRETARY September**  **24, 2012** 

**Mr. Shawn**  **M. Garvin**  **R e** **gi o** **n al**  **Administrator U.S.**  **Environmental Protection**  **Agency, Region**  **III 1650**  

## A **r c**  

### h **Street** 

### (

**M a**  **i l**  **Code:** 

### 3RAOO) **Philadelphia, PA**  **19103-2029 Dear**  

# �

**I am**  **pleased to**  **submit a**  **State Implementation**  **Plan (SIP)**  **revision addressing**  **compliance with**  **Section 110(a)(2)**  **of t**  **h e**  **Clean Air**  

## Act **(CAA) for t**  

### h **e 2008**  **N a** 

**ti o**  **n a**  **l Ambient**  

### Air **Quality Standard**  **(NAAQS) for**  **lead. Section**  **110(a)(1) of**  **t h**  **e CAA,**  **42 U.**  **S** 

### . 

## C **. §**  **7410(a)(1» provides**  **that states**  **m u**  **s t**  **adopt and**  **submit SIP**  **revisions to**  **the U.S.**  **Environmental Protection**  **Agency within**  **three years**  **after the**  **p r**  **o m**  **ulg a**  **ti on**  **of a**  **new or**  **revised NAAQS.**  **Enclosed are**  **two .hard**  **c o**  **p i** **e s**  

### and **a compact**  **disk containing**  **the Lead**  **Infrastructure SIP**  **submittal�** 

### which **includes documentation**  **for the**  **Department of**  **En vi**  **r o**  **nme n** **ta l**  **Protection's**

**. (Department)**  **public participation**  **a cti**  **v iti**  **e s**  

### . **The public**  **part i**  **c i** **p ati**  **o n**  **process for**  **this SIP**  **. .**  **revision included**  **a 30-day**  **written comment**  **period and**  **a p** **u bl**  **i c**  **hearing.** 

### ( **S e**  **e 42**  

### Pa.B. **3342, June**  **9, 2012).**  **The Department's**  **comment/response document**  **is also**  **included. Thank**  **you in**  **advance for**  

### the **e x.** **pe d**  **i ti**  **o**

**u s**  **consideration of**  **this SIP**  **submittal. If**  **you have**  **questions or**  **need additional**  **information, please**  **contact Joyce**  **E. Epps,**  **Director of**  

### the **Bureau of**  

## Air **Quality, by**  **e-mail atjeepps@state.p��**  **t e** **l eph**  **o n**  **e at**  **717.787.9702. S·**  

### ,. **'** 

# ....

**/�**

# �**z**

# �g;r **1. Krancer**  **- �---** **--- -.**  **Secretary**

**Rachel Carson**  **State Office**  **BuildIng I P.O.**  **Box 2063**  **I Harrisburg,**  **PA 17105-2063**  **717.787.2814 PJ'inted**  **on RecyCled**  **Paper** 

# @ **www.depweb.state.pa.�s**
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-13418

 

CENTURY PROPERTIES GROWTHFUND XXII, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
# South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-41 78 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov

May 1,2012 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld, Region Administrator U.S. EPA REGION 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA94105 DearMr. Blumenfeld: The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is responsible for submitting National Air Monitoring Station (NAMS), State and Local Air Monitoring Station (SLAMS), Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Station (PAMS), National Air Toxics Trends Stations (NAITS) and air quality data to the Air Quality System (AQS) for those AQS monitors underthe control ofSCAQMD. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, this letter certifies that the following ambient concentrationdata and the quality assurance data are completely submitted to AQS:

• 2011 FRM

### PMZ5 • 2011 FRMPMIO • 2011 Pb • 2010 Pb • 2011 FRM 03, NO

### z ,CO and S02 • 2011 Continuous 

### PM Z5 and PM10 • 2010 NAITS (Metals) • 2008, 2009, 2010

### PMZ .5Speciation Data

The above ambient data are accurate to the best of my knowledge, taking into considerationthe quality assurance findings. This letter ofcertification fulfills in part the certification objectives ofthe Section 105 Grant for Fiscal Year 2012. A separate letter to certify the remaining 2011 ambient concentration data will be submitted shortly to completethe certification objectives. The required summary reports for 2011 have been sent electronically to Dr. Meredith Kurpius at U.S. EPARegion 9. 

# IIfyou have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 396-2105, or Dr. Jason Low, Quality Assurance Manager, Science and Technology Advancement, at (909) 396-2269. Sincerely,

# c~0 Deputy Executive Officer Science and Technology Advancement CSL: JL

cc: M. Leonard R. Eden P. Fine R. Bermudez
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of Huntington Preferred Capital,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael J. McMennamin, President of the Company (principal executive
officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
        of the Company.


                                      /s/ Michael J. McMennamin
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                      Michael J. McMennamin
                                      President
                                      (principal executive officer)
                                      March 28, 2003
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Instructional Staff Salary and BenefitsSpending: 1991-2011

Report ; Data Table

SuDoc:ED 1.162:SA 3
Item Number:0461-A-41(online)
CGP system Number:001028582
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4549 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 14, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 

conduct security screening at certain airports, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4549 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treating Small Air3 ports with Fairness Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONDUCT OF SECURITY SCREENING BY THE TRANS5 PORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AT 

6 CERTAIN AIRPORTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Trans8 portation Security Administration shall provide for secu9 rity screening to be conducted by the Transportation Secu10 rity Administration at, and provide all necessary staff and 

11 equipment to, any airport— 

12 (1) that lost commercial air service on or after 

13 January 1, 2013; and 

14 (2) the operator of which, following the loss de15 scribed in paragraph (1), submits to the Adminis16 trator— 

17 (A) a request for security screening to be 

18 conducted at such airport by the Transpor19 tation Security Administration; and 

20 (B) written confirmation of a commitment 

21 from a commercial air carrier— 

22 (i) that such air carrier intends to re23 sume commercial air service at such air24 port; and 

25 (ii) to resume such service not later 

26 than the date that is one year after the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4549 RFS

1 date of the submission of the request 

2 under subparagraph (A). 

3 (b) DEADLINE.—Subject to the one-year limitation 

4 described in subsection (a)(2)(B)(ii), the Administrator of 

5 the Transportation Security Administration shall ensure 

6 that the process of implementing security screening by the 

7 Transportation Security Administration at an airport de8 scribed in subsection (a) is complete not later than the 

9 later of— 

10 (1) the date that is 90 days after the date on 

11 which the operator of such airport submits to the 

12 Administrator a request for such screening under 

13 paragraph (2)(A) of such subsection; or 

14 (2) the date on which the commercial air car15 rier that is the subject of such a request intends to 

16 resume commercial air service at such airport. 

17 (c) EFFECTS ON OTHER AIRPORTS.—The Adminis18 trator of the Transportation Security Administration shall 

19 carry out this section in a manner that does not negatively 

20 affect operations at airports not described in this section 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 4549 RFS

1 that are otherwise provided security screening conducted 

2 by the Transportation Security Administration. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000739710
<NAME> WELLESLEY II-B FDS 9/30/96
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         134,381
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,502
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               145,881
<PP&E>                                         817,877
<DEPRECIATION>                                 812,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 150,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    11,299,475
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                (11,186,975)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   150,803
<SALES>                                        113,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,142
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,033
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,245
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                117,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            117,699
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   117,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Johanna Olsen v. Mary Jacobson et al.

Filed February 2, 1898.

No. 7806.

Affirmance where all the questions presented are based on an unauthenticated bill of exceptions.

Error from the district court of Washington county. ■ Tried below before Keysor, J.

*Affirmed.*

*W. S. Cook, D. Z. Mummert,*and *Frick é Dolezal,*for plaintiff in error.

*Davis & Howell*and *F. R. Duffie, contra. ■*

Ryan, C.

All the questions presented by the petition in error in this case depend upon the contents of an alleged bill of exceptions, and as it is not authenticated, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Frezer, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Kevin R. KeatingKevin
                R. Keating
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              March
                26, 2008
### §2108. Tribal right to develop mineral resources

Nothing in this chapter shall impair any right of an Indian tribe organized under section 16 or 17 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 987), as amended [25 U.S.C. 5123, 5124], to develop their mineral resources as may be provided in any constitution or charter adopted by such tribe pursuant to that Act [25 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 97–382, §9, Dec. 22, 1982, 96 Stat. 1940.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of June 18, 1934, referred to in text, popularly known as the Indian Reorganization Act, is classified generally to chapter 45 (§5101 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5101 of this title and Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 161

 154

 147

 157

 158

 163

 152

 158

 151

 144

 148

 149

 151

 155

 167

 159

 145

 143

 136

 139

 137

 143

 159

 145

 144

 139

 141

 141

 132

 123

 146

 131

 133

 141

 150

 138

 139

 139

 137

 131

 133

 137

 142

 143

 151

 137

 127

 130

 125

 129

 130

 133

 140

 129

 128

 133

 130

 126

 111

 112

 154

 145

 142

 149

 153

 150

 145

 148

 142

 139

 143

 145

 147

 149

 158

 144

 134

 135

 131

 133

 135

 139

 149

 136

 137

 136

 137

 130

 126

 115

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### §1300j–6. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–323, §7, Sept. 21, 1994, 108 Stat. 2154, which listed counties in Michigan comprising the band's service area, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §171. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(e), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3379

Section, acts Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 355, 37 Stat. 461; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309, related to determining per capita costs of patients at Saint Elizabeths Hospital.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
#### § 15.1 Scope.

The State of Florida has established a similar coral reef preserve on an area situated shoreward of a line three geographic miles from Key Largo and contiguous to the Key Largo Coral Reef Preserve. It is the policy of the Department of the Interior to cooperate with the State of Florida and its conservation agencies in the preservation of the reef.
### **CHAPTER 44—NATIVE AMERICAN BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, TRADE PROMOTION, AND TOURISM**

Sec.
4301.
Findings; purposes.
4302.
Definitions.
4303.
Office of Native American Business Development.
4304.
Native American trade and export promotion.
4305.
Intertribal tourism demonstration projects.
4306.
Report to Congress.
4306a.
Indian community development initiatives.
4307.
Authorization of appropriations.
#*

#*

#*

#*

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

#* Flannelmouth sucker

Water

Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Conservation Populations

Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Current Populations

Colorado River Cutthroat Trout Historic Populations

BLM Sensitive Fish Species

Map 3-23

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Cottonwood Creek

New

Fork River

La Barge Creek

Middle Piney Creek Green River

Gree n River

H o rse Creek

B eaver Cre e k

Muddy C reek

Fontenelle River

East Fork River

Boulder Creek

Pole

Creek

Fontenelle

Reservoir

*Although recent survey data have not included bluehead

sucker or roundtail chub locations within the planning area,

they could still potentially occur within the area.
#### Catharine Fleming as Administratrix, etc., Appellant, *v.*The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Respondent.

(Argued September 26, 1878;

decided October 4, 1878.)

*F. P. Wilder*for appellant.

*Winchester Britton*for respondent.

Agree to affirm. No opinion.

All concur, except Miller and Earl, JJ., absent. Judgment affirmed.
### §1778b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–568, title VI, §604, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2908, which ratified the Settlement Agreement, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.206 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* A recipient that employs fifteen or more people shall designate at least one person to coordinate efforts to comply with this subpart.
( b ) *Adoption of grievance procedures.* A recipient that employs fifteen or more people shall adopt grievance procedures that incorporate appropriate due process standards and that provide for the prompt and equitable resolution of complaints alleging any action prohibited by this subpart. Such procedures need not be established with respect to complaints from applicants for employment or from applicants for admission to postsecondary educational institutions.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13(a)-14(a)/15d-14(a) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Richard H. De Voto, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Canyon Resources
Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the period presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and, b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. /s/ Richard H. De Voto
    
    Date: October 25, 2004Richard H. De Voto, Chief Executive Officer