### 50156 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules

Engine model Manufacturer Aircraft model

Nauchang .......................................................................................................................... N5 IO–720–D1C ................... Piper ............................................................................................. ..................................... PA–36–375 Brave

Unsafe Condition

(d) This AD results from Lycoming Engines discovering that the March 1, 1997 start date of affected engine models in Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 569A, is incorrect. Lycoming Engines issued Supplement 1 to MSB No. 569A, dated May 27, 2009, which corrected the date of affected engine models, to January 1, 1997. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the crankshaft, which will result in total engine power loss, in-flight engine failure, and possible loss of the aircraft.
Compliance

(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the actions have already been done.
Engines for Which No Action Is Required

(f) If your engine meets any of the following conditions, and you have not had the crankshaft replaced since meeting the condition, no further action is required:

(1) Engines that are in compliance with Lycoming MSB No. 552 (AD 2002–19–03) or MSB No. 553 (AD 2002–19–03 Table 3 or Table 5); or

(2) Engines that are in compliance with Lycoming MSB No. 566 AD (2005–19–11); or

(3) Engines that are in compliance with Lycoming Supplement No. 1 to MSB No. 566 (AD 2006–06–16); or

(4) Engines that are in compliance with the original issue of Lycoming MSB No. 569, MSB No. 569A, and Supplement 1 to MSB No. 569A.

(5) For engines identified in paragraphs (f), (g), (h), or (i) of this AD, owners or operators may make an entry in the AD status log required by 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v) that this AD required no action for compliance.

(g) If Lycoming Engines manufactured new, rebuilt, overhauled, or repaired your engine, or replaced the crankshaft in your engine before January 1, 1997, and you have not had the crankshaft replaced, no further action is required.

(h) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, lists your engine serial number (S/N), and Table 5 of MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, does not list your crankshaft S/N, no further action is required.

(i) For engine model TIO–540–U2A, S/N L–4641–61A, no action is required.
Engines for Which Action Is Required

(j) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, lists your engine S/N, and Table 5 of MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, lists your crankshaft S/N, replace the affected crankshaft with a crankshaft that is not listed in Table 5 of MSB No. 569A at the earliest of the following:

(1) The time of the next engine overhaul as specified in Lycoming Engines Service Instruction No. 1009AS, dated May 25, 2006;

or (2) The next separation of the crankcase, or

(3) No later than 12 years from the time the crankshaft first entered service or was last overhauled, whichever is later.

(k) If Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, or Table 4 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, does not list your engine S/N, and Table 5 of MSB No. 569A does list your crankshaft S/N (an affected crankshaft was installed as a replacement), replace the affected crankshaft with a crankshaft that is not listed in Table 5 of MSB No. 569A at the earliest of the following:

(1) The time of the next engine overhaul as specified in Lycoming Engines Service Instruction No. 1009AS, dated May 25, 2006;

or (2) The next separation of the crankcase, or

(3) No later than 12 years from the time the crankshaft first entered service or was last overhauled, whichever is later.
Prohibition Against Installing Certain Crankshafts

(l) After the effective date of this AD, do not install any crankshaft that has a S/N listed in Table 5 of Lycoming MSB No. 569A, dated April 11, 2006, into any engine.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)

(m) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. AMOCs approved for AD 2006–20–09 are approved as AMOCs for this AD.

Related Information

(n) For more information about this AD, contact Norm Perenson, Aerospace Engineer, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;phone: 516–228–7337; fax: 516–794–5531; email: norman.perenson@faa.gov.

(o) For service information identified in this AD, contact Lycoming, 652 Oliver Street, Williamsport, PA 17701; telephone (570) 323–6181; fax (570) 327–7101, or on the
Internet at http:// www.Lycoming.Textron.com. You may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call

781–238–7125.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on August 5, 2011. Peter A. White, Acting Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–20519 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION** 

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**14 CFR Part 71**

**[Docket No. FAA–2011–0455; Airspace Docket No. 11–AEA–4]** 

**Proposed Establishment of Class D and E Airspace; Frederick, MD** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

**SUMMARY :**  This action proposes to establish Class D and E airspace at Frederick, MD, to accommodate new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Frederick Municipal Airport. This action would enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations for SIAPs at the airport.

**DATES :**  0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before September 26,
2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments on this rule to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–0001; Telephone: 1–800– 647–5527; Fax: 202–493–2251. You must identify the Docket Number FAA– 2011–0455; Airspace Docket No. 11– AEA–04, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit and review received comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

You may review the public docket containing the rule, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets Office (see

**ADDRESSES** section for address and phone number) between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.

An informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, Room 350, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, Georgia
30337.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Richard Horrocks, Airspace Specialist, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization,


### 50157 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules

Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305–5588.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
Comments Invited

Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in triplicate to the address listed above. Those wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ‘‘Comments to Docket No. FAA–2011–0455; Airspace Docket No. 11–AEA–4.’’ The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter. All communications received before the specified closing date for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of the comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the docket. Availability of NPRMs

An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from and comments submitted through http:// www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking documents can also be accessed through the FAA’s Web page at http://www.faa.gov/ airports

_airtraffic/air

_traffic/ publications/airspace

_amendments/. Additionally, any person may obtain a copy of this notice by submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Office of Air Traffic Airspace Management, ATA– 400, 800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267–8783. Communications must identify both docket numbers for this notice. Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future NPRMs should contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking, (202) 267–9677, to request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application procedure. The Proposal The FAA is considering an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish Class D airspace extending upward from the surface to 2,800 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of Frederick Municipal Airport. Class E surface area airspace, within a 5-mile radius of the airport and Class E airspace designated as an extension to Class D surface area. Controlled airspace is necessary for the new RNAV GPS standard instrument approach procedures developed for the airport and for continued safety and management of IFR operations at Frederick Municipal Airport.

Designations for Class D and E airspace areas are published in Paragraphs 5000, 6002 and 6004 respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9U, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and E airspace designations listed in this document would be published subsequently in the Order.

The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current. It, therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency’s authority.

This proposed rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This proposed regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would establish Class D and E airspace at Frederick Municipal Airport, Frederick, MD. Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air). The Proposed Amendment

In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

**PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR**  **TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS** 

1. The authority citation for part 71 will continue to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 1963 Comp., p. 389.

**§ 71.1 [Amended]**

2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation Administration Order 7400.9U, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 18, 2010, and effective September 15, 2010, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace
* * * * *

AEA MD D Frederick, MD [NEW] Frederick Municipal Airport, MD

(Lat. 39 ° 25 ′03 ′′ N., long. 77 ° 22 ′ 28 ′′ W.) That airspace extending from the surface up to and including 2,800 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of Frederick Municipal Airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6002 Class E airspace designated as surface areas
* * * * *

AEA MD E2 Frederick, MD [NEW] Frederick Municipal Airport, MD

(Lat. 39 ° 25 ′03 ′′ N., long. 77 ° 22 ′ 28 ′′ W.) That airspace extending from the surface up to and including 2,800 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Frederick Municipal Airport. This Class E airspace area is effective during specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.
Paragraph 6004 Class E airspace designated as an extension to a Class D surface area.
* * * * *

AEA MD E4 Frederick, MD [NEW] Frederick Municipal Airport, MD

(Lat. 39 ° 25 ′03 ′′ N., long. 77 ° 22 ′ 28 ′′ W.) That airspace extending from the surface within 3.2 miles either side of the 036 °


### 50158 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 156 / Friday, August 12, 2011 / Proposed Rules

bearing from the airport extending from the 5 mile radius to 7.6 miles northeast of the airport. This Class E airspace area is effective during specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Issued in College Park, Georgia, on August 5, 2011. Mark D. Ward, Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2011–20504 Filed 8–11–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE**

**Bureau of Economic Analysis**

**15 CFR Part 801**

**[Docket No. 110112021–1439–02]**

**RIN 0691–AA76**

**International Services Surveys: Amendments to the BE–120,**  **Benchmark Survey of Transactions in Selected Services and Intangible**  **Assets With Foreign Persons**

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Economic Analysis, Commerce.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking.

**SUMMARY :**  This proposed rule would amend the regulations of the Bureau of Economic Analysis, Department of Commerce (BEA) to set forth the reporting requirements for the BE–120, Benchmark Survey of Transactions in Selected Services and Intellectual Property with Foreign Persons. The proposed BE–120 would include both definition changes and the addition of three schedules to better collect data in accordance with new international standards. In addition, this proposed rule would change the BE–120 survey title from ‘‘Benchmark Survey of Transactions in Selected Services and Intangible Assets with Foreign Persons’’ to ‘‘Benchmark Survey of Transactions in Selected Services and Intellectual Property with Foreign Persons’’ because the term ‘‘intellectual property’’ is better understood by U.S. respondents.

The proposed BE–120 survey is intended to cover transactions in selected services and intellectual property with foreign persons in benchmark years. In non-benchmark years, the universe estimates for these transactions would be derived fromsample data reported on BEA’s followon survey, which is the Quarterly Survey of Transactions in Selected Services and Intangible Assets with Foreign Persons (BE–125). The data will be used by BEA to estimate the trade in services component of the U.S. International Transactions Accounts and other economic accounts compiled by BEA. The data are also needed by the U.S. government to monitor U.S. exports and imports of selected services and intellectual property; analyze their impact on the U.S. and foreign economies; support U.S. international trade policy for selected services and intellectual property; and assess and promote U.S. competitiveness in international trade in services. In addition, the data will improve the ability of U.S. businesses to identify and evaluate market opportunities.

**DATES :**  Comments on this proposed rule will receive consideration if submitted in writing on or before 5 p.m. October 11, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments by any of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. For agency, select ‘‘Commerce Department—all.’’

• E-mail: Christopher.Emond@bea.gov.

• Fax: Chris Emond, Chief, Special Surveys Branch, (202) 606–5318.

• Mail: Chris Emond, Chief, Special Surveys Branch, Balance of Payments Division, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, BE–50, Washington, DC 20230.

• Hand Delivery: Chris Emond, Chief, Special Surveys Branch, Balance of Payments Division, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, BE–50, Shipping and Receiving Section, M100, 1441 L Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

Please include in your comment a reference to RIN 0691–AA76 in the subject line.

Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in the proposed rule should be sent both to BEA, through any of the methods listed above, and to the Office of Management and Budget, O.I.R.A., Paperwork Reduction Project, Attention PRA Desk Officer for BEA, via e-mail at pbugg@omb.eop.gov, or by FAX at 202–
395–7245.

Public Inspection: All comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted to http:// www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (for example, name, address, etc. ) voluntarily submitted by the commentator may be publicly accessible. Do not submit confidential business information or other sensitive or protected information. BEA will accept anonymous comments.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Chris Emond, Chief, Special Surveys Branch, Balance of Payments Division (BE–50), Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC 20230; e-mail Christopher.Emond@bea.gov; or phone (202) 606–9826.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposed rule would amend 15 CFR 801.10 to update certain reporting requirements for the BE–120, Benchmark Survey of Transactions in Selected Services and Intangible Assets with Foreign Persons. The proposed BE–120 would include both definition changes and the addition of three schedules to better collect data in accordance with new international standards. In addition, this proposed rule would change the title of the BE– 120 survey and make other nonsubstantive format changes to the regulations.

The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Description of Changes

The BE–120 survey as proposed in this rule would be conducted by BEA every five years beginning with transactions occurring in fiscal year 2011, under the authority provided by the International Investment and Trade in Services Survey Act (Pub. L. 94–472, 90 Stat. 2059, 22 U.S.C. 3101–3108), hereinafter, ‘‘the Act,’’ and would be mandatory for those U.S. persons that engage in the covered transactions in amounts that exceed the exemption level. The proposed BE–120 survey is intended to cover sales to foreign persons of any of the 36 types of services or intellectual property listed in proposed paragraph 801.10(c) in benchmark years. In non-benchmark years, the universe estimates for these transactions would be derived fromsample data reported on BEA’s followon survey, which is the Quarterly Survey of Transactions in Selected Services and Intangible Assets with Foreign Persons (BE–125). If this proposed rule is implemented, BEA would send the survey to potential respondents in March of 2012; responses would be due by June 30,
2012.