alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4703. Scholarship program authority

#### (a) In general

The President, acting through the United States Information Agency, shall provide scholarships (including partial assistance) for undergraduate study at United States institutions of higher education by citizens and nationals of developing countries who have completed their secondary education and who would not otherwise have an opportunity to study in the United States due to financial limitations.

#### (b) Form of scholarship; forgiveness of loan repayment

To encourage students to use their training in their countries of origin, each scholarship pursuant to this section shall be in the form of a loan with all repayment to be forgiven upon the student's prompt return to his or her country of origin for a period which is at least one year longer than the period spent studying in the United States. If the student is granted asylum in the United States pursuant to section 1158 of title 8 or is admitted to the United States as a refugee pursuant to section 1157 of title 8, half of the repayment shall be forgiven.

#### (c) Consultation

Before allocating any of the funds made available to carry out this chapter, the President shall consult with United States institutions of higher education, educational exchange organizations, United States missions in developing countries, and the governments of participating countries on how to implement the guidelines specified in section 4704 of this title.

#### (d) "Institution of higher education" defined

For purposes of this chapter, the term "institution of higher education" has the same meaning as given to such term by section 1001 of title 20.

(Pub. L. 99–93, title VI, §603, Aug. 16, 1985, 99 Stat. 440; Pub. L. 105–244, title I, §102(a)(7)(D), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1619.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 105–244 substituted "section 1001" for "section 1141(a)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–244 effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as a note under section 1001 of Title 20, Education.

#### Transfer of Functions

United States Information Agency (other than Broadcasting Board of Governors and International Broadcasting Bureau) abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of State, see sections 6531 and 6532 of this title.
### §230. Depositions by agents touching depredations

The superintendents, agents, and subagents within their respective districts are authorized and empowered to take depositions of witnesses touching any depredations, within the purview of sections 227, 228 1 and 229 of this title, and to administer oaths to the deponents.

(R.S. §2157.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 227 and 228 of this title, referred to in text, were repealed by act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, and are covered by section 1160 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

#### Codification

R.S. §2157 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 161, §18, 4 Stat. 732.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with. See note set out under section 64 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §396c. Lessees of restricted lands to furnish bonds for performance

On and after May 11, 1938, lessees of restricted Indian lands, tribal or allotted, for mining purposes, including oil and gas, shall furnish corporate surety bonds, in amounts satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior, guaranteeing compliance with the terms of their leases: Provided, That personal surety bonds may be accepted where the sureties deposit as collateral with the said Secretary of the Interior any public-debt obligations of the United States guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States equal to the full amount of such bonds, or other collateral satisfactory to the Secretary of the Interior, or show ownership to unencumbered real estate of a value equal to twice the amount of the bonds.

(May 11, 1938, ch. 198, §3, 52 Stat. 348.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeal of Inconsistent Acts

For repeal of inconsistent acts, see section 7 of act May 11, 1938, set out as a note under section 396a of this title.
#### § 2568.113 Do I have to prove that I used and occupied the land I've chosen as an alternative allotment?

No. If BLM cannot convey the allotment for which you originally apply, and you are eligible to choose an alternative allotment, you do not have to prove that you used and occupied the land in the alternative location.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,302.96

 2,302.85

 2,302.75

 2,302.58

 2,302.42

 2,302.28

 2,302.16

 2,302.06

 2,301.94

 2,301.82

 2,301.77

 2,301.67

 2,301.62

 2,301.54

 2,301.44

 2,301.44

 2,301.42

 2,301.33

 2,301.29

 2,301.21

 2,301.11

 2,301.03

 2,300.89

 2,300.76

 2,300.76

 2,300.59

 2,300.51

 2,300.47

 2,300.40

 2,300.30

 2,300.20

 1,497.5

 1,496.2

 1,495.0

 1,492.9

 1,491.0

 1,489.3

 1,487.9

 1,486.7

 1,485.3

 1,483.8

 1,483.2

 1,482.0

 1,481.4

 1,480.5

 1,479.3

 1,479.3

 1,479.1

 1,478.0

 1,477.5

 1,476.5

 1,475.4

 1,474.4

 1,472.7

 1,471.2

 1,471.2

 1,469.2

 1,468.2

 1,467.8

 1,466.9

 1,465.7

 1,464.6

STORAGE

-1.8

-1.3

-1.2

-2.0

-1.9

-1.7

-1.4

-1.2

-1.4

-1.4

-0.6

-1.2

-0.6

-1.0

-1.2

+0.0

-0.2

-1.1

-0.5

-1.0

-1.2

-1.0

-1.7

-1.5

+0.0

-2.0

-0.9

-0.5

-0.8

-1.2

-1.2

CHANGE

-42

216

369

-63

6

111

2

215

30

39

146

-103

239

19

29

32

32

34

187

-1

55

87

-89

-92

83

-9

-100

5

-52

4

15

INFLOW

 840

 881

 931

 932

 933

 936

 646

 780

 707

 707

 404

 473

 486

 458

 532

 0

 138

 0

 381

 455

 579

 243

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 571

 610

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 550

 0

 0

 0

 283

 718

 668

 45

 958

 357

 206

 329

 0

 0

OUTLET

 28

 0

 42

 32

 39

 21

 81

 39

 46

 53

 42

 25

 53

 42

 98

 32

 14

 25

 46

 25

 77

 42

 31

 17

 38

 49

 21

 38

 38

 31

 3

C.F.S.

 .08

 .00

 .12

 .09

 .11

 .06

 .23

 .11

 .13

 .15

 .12

 .07

 .15

 .12

 .28

 .09

 .04

 .07

 .13

 .07

 .22

 .12

 .09

 .05

 .11

 .14

 .06

 .11

 .11

 .09

 .01

INCHES

 .03

 .16

 .16

 .33

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 13, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -34.7 1,404 13,623 0 4,114 1,168 3.33 .72

ACRE-FEET -34,700 2,785 27,021 0 8,160 2,317

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 27,021

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 8,160

 35,181

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .72

JULY 1, 2018 .75

 1,499.3

Table 4

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = .72
### SUBCHAPTER III—FLORIDA INDIAN (MICCOSUKEE) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 828.52

 828.37

 828.24

 828.08

 828.20

 828.66

 829.11

 829.68

 830.29

 830.78

 831.26

 831.68

 831.98

 832.43

 832.37

 832.14

 832.00

 831.86

 831.65

 831.65

 832.02

 832.28

 832.42

 832.52

 832.52

 832.48

 832.39

 832.27

 35.60

 35.44

 35.30

 35.13

 35.26

 35.75

 36.24

 36.86

 37.53

 38.07

 38.60

 39.08

 39.41

 39.93

 39.86

 39.60

 39.44

 39.28

 39.04

 39.04

 39.46

 39.76

 39.92

 40.03

 40.03

 39.99

 39.88

 39.75

STORAGE

-0.14

-0.16

-0.14

-0.17

+0.13

+0.49

+0.48

+0.62

+0.67

+0.54

+0.54

+0.47

+0.34

+0.51

-0.07

-0.26

-0.16

-0.16

-0.24

+0.00

+0.42

+0.30

+0.16

+0.12

+0.00

-0.05

-0.10

-0.14

CHANGE

272

259

271

254

236

270

265

335

359

295

294

261

193

281

234

215

266

269

228

346

557

499

431

408

350

328

298

283

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 320

 319

 320

 319

 149

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 245

 326

 326

 326

 326

 326

 326

 326

 327

 327

 327

 327

 327

 326

OUTLET

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 2

 4

 2

 1

 2

 1

 0

 1

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 6

C.F.S.

 .06

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .06

 .07

 .07

 .09

 .06

 .11

 .06

 .03

 .06

 .04

 .00

 .04

 .07

 .08

 .09

 .08

 .11

 .09

 .17

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .00

 .11

 .16

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 RUN DATE: 03/13/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4.00 8,557 5,915 560 62 1.80 .80

ACRE-FEET +4,000 16,973 11,732 1,111 123

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,111

OUTLET

TOTAL

 11,732

 12,843

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .80

JULY 1, 2001 17.20

 35.74

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### Paramjit Singh MANN, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 03-72753, 04-72261, 04-74762.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Jan. 11, 2006.

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

*220Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Offices of Martin Resendez Guajardo A Professional Corporation, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Ernesto H. Molina, Jr., Esq., Alison Marie Igoe, Esq., James E. Grimes, Esq., Mark C. Walters, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: NOONAN, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Petitioner Paramjit Singh Mann (“Mann”) petitions for review of three orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). Mann applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture. The first order under review is the BIA’s affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of relief on the basis of an adverse credibility determination. The second and third orders under review are denials of a motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider based on an alleged denial of a fair hearing.

As to the first order under review, we review the credibility findings of the BIA and IJ for substantial evidence and will only reverse if the evidence compels a contrary result. *Chebchoub v. INS, 257*F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001). Based on the record before us, we hold that substantial evidence supports the IJ’s adverse credibility determination. The IJ cited several inconsistencies in Mann’s testimony. These inconsistences are a legitimate basis upon which to base an adverse credibility determination. *See Singh v. Ashcroft,*367 F.3d 1139, 1142-43 (9th Cir. 2004). In addition, the IJ found Mann’s story to be implausible. *See BerroteranMelendez v. INS,*955 F.2d 1251, 1257 (9th Cir.1992).

The second and third orders under review are the BIA’s denial of Mann’s motion to reopen and motion to reconsider. Mann alleged that he had been denied a fair hearing due to the lack of a competent interpreter. The BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider are reviewed for an abuse of discretion. *See INS v. Doherty,*502 U.S. 314, 324, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992); *see also Cano-Merida v. INS,*311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). Mann had the burden to show that “a better translation would have made a difference in the outcome of the hearing.” *Perez-Lastor v. INS,*208 F.3d 773, 780 (9th Cir.2000) (citation omitted). Mann presented an alternative translation as part of his request. However, he did not put forth any reasons as to how the second translation differed in any substantial way from the first or how he was prejudiced by the first translation. Thus, Mann failed to meet his burden and the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying his motions.

PETITIONS DENIED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §§241 to 250. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862

Section 241, R.S. §2139; acts Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, §1, 19 Stat. 244; July 23, 1892, ch. 234, 27 Stat. 260; June 15, 1938, ch. 435, §1, 52 Stat. 696, related to sale of intoxicating liquor. See sections 1154 and 1156 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.

Section 241a, act Mar. 1, 1895, ch. 145, §8, 28 Stat. 697, related to punishment for sale of intoxicating liquors. See section 1155 of Title 18.

Section 242, acts Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 146, §17, 39 Stat. 983; June 13, 1932, ch. 245, 47 Stat. 302, related to manufacture and sale of alcohol in Osage County, Oklahoma. See section 1154 of Title 18.

Section 243, R.S. §2139, act July 23, 1892, ch. 234, 27 Stat. 261, related to complaints, arrests, and convictions. See section 3041 of Title 18, and rule 5 of Title 18, Appendix.

Section 244, acts May 25, 1918, ch. 86, §1, 40 Stat. 563; June 30, 1919, ch. 4, §1, 41 Stat. 4, related to possession of intoxicating liquor in Indian country. See section 1156 of Title 18.

Section 244a, act Mar. 5, 1934, ch. 43, 48 Stat. 396, related to repeal of certain liquor laws affecting former Indian Territory now a part of Oklahoma. See sections 1154 to 1156 of Title 18.

Section 245, act May 18, 1916, ch. 125, §1, 39 Stat. 124, related to possession of intoxicating liquor as prima facie evidence of unlawful production. See sections 3113 and 3488 of Title 18.

Section 246, R.S. §2140, related to searches and seizures. See section 3113 of Title 18.

Section 247, act Mar. 2, 1917, ch. 146, §1, 39 Stat. 970, related to seizure of vehicles. See section 3618 of Title 18.

Section 248, act Mar. 1, 1907, ch. 2285, 34 Stat. 1017, related to powers of special agents and deputies to suppress liquor traffic. See section 3113 of Title 18.

Section 249, act July 4, 1884, ch. 180, §1, 23 Stat. 94, related to officers and soldiers of Army furnishing liquor to Indians. See section 1154 of Title 18.

Section 250, act Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 388, §1, 37 Stat. 519, related to powers of chief special officer and deputies to suppress liquor traffic. See section 3055 of Title 18.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Sept. 1, 1948, see act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §20, 62 Stat. 862.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         442,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               496,394
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 514,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,279,218
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (764,416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   514,802
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,102
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,857
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Motion granted and Order filed April 26, 2022.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 2 1

- 0 0 740

- CV

____________ IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF THOMAS NEY HUNT, II, AN ALLEGED

INCAPACITATED PERSON

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21

- CPR

- 036072



### O R D E R

Before the court is appellee’s motion for assistance with reporter’s record. Appellee states a record of a hearing the trial court held on August 16, 2021 is necessary for preparation of appellee’s brief. The motion also states that appellee has made several requests to the court reporter to clarify the fee for that transcript, but those requests have been un successful. This court is jointly responsible with the trial court for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). Accordingly, the court GRANTS appellant’s motion . The official court reporter of the County Court at Law No. 3 of Fort Bend County is ordered to inform2

this court within 10 days of the date of this order what payment is required for the
record of the August 16, 2021 hearing and a date by which the record can be filed

. If the court reporter fails to do so this court may abate the appeal for a hearing in the
trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(e)(3)

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
### §1780. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–286, §2, Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1218, which set out definitions of terms and purposes of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 109–286, §1, Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1218, provided that Pub. L. 109–286, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Pueblo de San Ildefonso Claims Settlement Act of 2005".
#### Titus G. Fish et al., Appellants, *v.*George Benedict, Sheriff, etc., Respondent.

(Argued September 20, 1878;

decided October 1, 1878.)

This was an action to recover possession of certain wagons which had been taken by defendant, as sheriff of the county of Oneida, from the firm of J. B. *&*M. H. Norton by virtue of an execution against the members of that firm.

The wagons had been shipped by the plaintiffs, who comprised the firm of Fish Brothers *&*Co., from Racine, Wisconsin, to the Nortons, at Utica, upon receipt of a written instrument signed by them and prepared by plaintiffs’ agent, the material portions of which instrument are as follows:

*614“ Utica, N. Y., *Oct.*5, 1875. FISH BROTHERS *& CO..*RACINE, WIS.

You will please ship as per margin below to Utica-, State of New York,-care of self, -for which agree to pay for as stated below.

*FISH BROTHERS <& Oo. are not responsible for overcharges in freight, injury o>' losses in transit.*

*ii£P“*In case payment of account is not promptly met when due, interest will be added to the amount due at the rate of ten per cent per annum until paid.

SST* The signature of the "party giving this order will be sufficient evidence of a full knowledge and acceptance of all the above conditions.

“We agree to pay for all wagons sold for cash as soon as sold ; if sold on time we will indorse and forward the notes with interest, and will keep wagons under cover and insured.

And do further agree that if any wagons remain unsold twelve months from invoice, to pay for the same and close the consignment. All notes taken for wagons shall become due within said time. The ■ above, wagons to be shipped in one car, and the freight to be not over sixty dollars to Buffalo.

“J. B. *&*M. H. NORTON.”

The court directed a verdict for defendant. *Held,*no error; that the paper was an order for a purchase by the Nortons, and a sale by the plaintiffs, and was not a creation of an agency to sell on commission; that the title to the wagons was transferred to the Nortons, and plaintiffs had no title or right of possession; and that the question as to the interpretation of the instrument was one of law only.

*615*Charles H. Searle*for appellants.

*Edwin H. Ilisley*for respondent.

Folger, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except Milleb and Earl, JJ., absent. Judgment affirmed.
§ 1784.4-2 Notice of meetings. ( a ) Notices of meetings of advisory committees and any subcommittees that may be formed shall be published in the Federal Register and distributed to the media 30 days in advance of a meeting. However, if urgent matters arise, notices of meetings of advisory committees and any subcommittees shall be published in the Federal Register and distributed to the media at least 15 days in advance of a meeting.
( b ) Notices shall set forth meeting locations, topics or issues to be discussed, and times and places for the public to be heard.