SUPPORTING STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, 

Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal)

1. Identification of the Information Collection

1(a) Title of the Information Collection

NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart 

CCCCC) (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 1995.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0521.

1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for NESHAP 

for Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCC) were 

proposed on July 3, 2001 (66 FR 35325), promulgated on April 14, 2003 (68 FR18007), and 

amended on August 2, 2005 (70 FR 44285). These regulations apply to owners or operators of 

both existing and new coke plants that are major sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) 

emissions. The NESHAP applies to emissions from pushing, soaking, quenching, and battery

stacks on both new and existing coke oven batteries. New facilities include those that 

commenced construction, modification or reconstruction after the date of proposal. This 

information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCC.

In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications, performance tests, and 

periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. They are also required to 

maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in 

the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system is 

inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, 

and are required of all affected facilities subject to NESHAP. 

Any owner/operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these 

measurements, and retain the file for at least five years following the date of such measurements, 

maintenance reports, and records. All reports are sent to the delegated state or local authority. 

In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are sent directly to the U. S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office.

 Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an average of 

2.8 affected battery stacks at each plant site and that each plant site has only one respondent 

(i.e. the owner/operator of the plant site).

Over the next three years, an average of 19 respondents per year (operating 58 

by-product batteries and 10 non-recovery batteries) will be subject to the standard, and 

no additional respondent per year will become subject to the standard. 

The active (previous) ICR had the following Terms of Clearance (TOC):
2

This request is approved for three years. Prior to resubmission of

this information collection request for renewal, the agency should

reassess estimates of burden taking into account recent experience

with the program.

EPA has addressed each item of concern in the TOC by consulting with industry trade 

associations, and other interested parties.

The burden to the “Affected Public” may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent 

Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR 

Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal). The burden to the “Federal Government” is attributed 

entirely to work performed by either Federal employees or government contractors and may be 

found below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coke Oven 

Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal). 

2. Need for and Use of the Collection

2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection

The EPA is charged under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, to establish 

standards of performance for each category or subcategory of major sources and area sources of 

hazardous air pollutants. These standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous 

air pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction. In addition, section 

114(a) states that the Administrator may require any owner/operator subject to any requirement 

of this Act to: 

(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; 

(C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use 

such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in 

accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at 

such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the 

Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control 

equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data 

when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit 

compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); 

and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may

reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from coke 

plants either cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger 

public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP was promulgated for this source category at 

40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCC.
3

2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard ensure compliance 

with the applicable regulations which where promulgated in accordance with the Clean Air 

Act. The collected information is also used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal 

proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected facility’s initial 

capability to comply with the emission standard. Continuous emission monitors are used to 

ensure compliance with the standard at all times. During the performance test a record of the 

operating parameters under which compliance was achieved may be recorded and used to 

determine compliance in place of a continuous emission monitor. 

The notifications required in the standard are used to inform the Agency or delegated 

authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing 

authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properly 

installed and operated, leaks are being detected and repaired and the standard is being met. 

The performance test may also be observed.

The required quarterly and semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess 

emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify operation/maintenance procedures, and for 

compliance determinations.

3. Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR part 63, subpart 

CCCCC.

3(a) Non-duplication

If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is sent directly to the 

appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is sent directly to the delegated 

state or local agency. If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to 

implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency can 

be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, 

duplication does not exist.

3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR was published 

in the Federal Register (76 FR 26900) on May 9, 2011. No comments were received on the 

burden published in the Federal Register.
4

3(c) Consultations

The Agency has consulted industry experts and internal data sources to project the 

number of affected facilities and industry growth over the next three years. The primary source 

of information as reported by industry, in compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting 

provisions in the standard, is the Online Tracking Information System (OTIS) which is operated 

and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, 

maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data. The growth rate for the industry is based on 

our consultations with the Agency’s internal industry experts. 

Industry trade associations and other interested parties were provided an opportunity to 

comment on the burden associated with the standard as it was being developed and the standard 

has been previously reviewed to determine the minimum information needed for compliance 

purposes. In developing this ICR, we contacted: 1) the American Coke and Coal Chemicals 

Institute, at (202) 452-7198; and 2) the Association for Iron & Steel Technology, at (724) 814-

3062. 

It is our policy to respond after a thorough review of comments received since the last 

ICR renewal as well as those submitted in response to the first Federal Register notice. 

3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that 

facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and 

recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are 

applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was 

collected less frequently, the proper operation and maintenance of control equipment and the 

possibility of detecting violations would be less likely.

3(e) General Guidelines

These reporting or recordkeeping requirements do not violate any of the regulations 

promulgated by OMB under 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and 

notifications for at least five years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to 

the standards. EPA believes that the five year records retention requirement is consistent the 

Part 70 permit program and the five year statute of limitations on which the permit program is 

based. The retention of records for five years allows EPA to establish the compliance history of 

a source, any pattern of non-compliance and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement 

action. EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond five 

years. In addition, EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to either the 

destruction or nonexistence of essential records.
5

3(f) Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made 

will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, 

subpart B - Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, 

September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 

1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g) Sensitive Questions

The reporting or recordkeeping requirements in the standard do not include sensitive 

questions.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes

The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners or operators 

of existing and new coke plants. The United States Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 

codes for the respondents affected by the standard and the corresponding North American 

Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes for owners or operators of existing and new coke 

plants are listed in the following table.

Standard (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) SIC Codes NAICS Codes

Iron and Steel Mills 3312 331111

All Other Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing 3312 324199

4(b) Information Requested

(i) Data Items

In this ICR, all the data that is recorded or reported is required by the NESHAP for Coke 

Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCC). 

A source must make the following reports:

Notifications

Initial notification requirements 63.9(b)(1)

Notification of compliance status when a source becomes subject to 

the standard

63.9(h), 63.7340(a)

Notification that source is subject to special compliance requirements, 63.9(d)
6

Notifications

if applicable

Notification of performance test 63.7(b), 63.9(e), 

63.5755(a)

Rescheduled of performance test 63.7(b)(2)

Demonstration of continuous monitoring system 63.9(g), 63.7340(a)

Change in information already provided 63.9(j)

Request for an extension of compliance with relevant standard 63.9(c)

Reports

Application for approval of the construction or reconstruction of a 

new major affected source, or reconstruction of a major affected 

source

63.5(6)(d)

Performance test results 63.10(d)(2), 63.5755

Startup, shutdown and malfunction plan 63.6(e)(3),63.7310(c)

Operation and maintenance plan for capture systems, control devices 

applied to pushing emissions, and by-product coke oven batteries

63.7300(b-c)

Immediate startup, shutdown and malfunction reports 63.6(e)(3), 63.734(d) 

63.10(d)(5)

Plan for soaking emissions 63.7294

Plan to prevent green pushes from by-product coke oven batteries 

with horizontal flues 63.7292

Progress reports for compliance extension (if applicable) 63.6(i)

Quarterly and semiannual compliance reports 63.7341(b-c)

A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping

Startup, shutdown and malfunction plan 63.6(e)(3), 

63.7342(a)(2)

All reports and notifications 63.10(b)(1), 

63.7342(a)(1)

Records of startup, shutdown, and malfunction of process equipment 63.10(b)(2)(i), (iv), 

(v), 63.7342(a)(2)

Records of malfunctions of air pollution control equipment 63.10(b)(2)(ii)
7

Recordkeeping

Any applicability determination that demonstrates why owner or 

operator believes source is unaffected

63.10(b)(3)

Records of maintenance of air pollution control equipment 63.10(b)(2)(iii)

Records of performance tests, performance evaluations, and opacity

and visible emissions observations

63.10(b)(2)(viii), 

63.7342(a)(3)

Five-year retention of records 63.10(b)(1), 

63.7342(d)

Electronic Reporting

Some of the respondents are using monitoring equipment that automatically records 

parameter data. Although personnel at the affected facility must still evaluate the data, internal 

automation has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping at 

a plant site. 

Also, regulatory agencies in cooperation with the respondents continue to create reporting 

systems to transmit data electronically. However, electronic reporting systems are still not 

widely used. At this time, it is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the respondents use 

electronic reporting.

(ii) Respondent Activities

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and utilizing technology and 

systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of processing and 

maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of disclosing and 

providing information.

Adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and 

requirements.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.
8

Currently sources are using monitoring and reporting equipment that provide parameter 

data in an automated way e.g., continuous parameter monitoring system. Although personnel at 

the source still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly

reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping

5. The Information Collected: Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and 

Information Management

5(a) Agency Activities 

EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, 

storage, and distribution of the required information.

Agency Activities

Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports, and excess emissions 

reports, required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the Online Tracking Information System (OTIS). 

5(b) Collection Methodology and Management

Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to 

determine whether the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated. 

Performance test reports are used by the Agency to discern a source’s initial capability to comply 

with the emission standard, and note the operating conditions under which compliance was 

achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in 

compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem 

identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance 

determinations.

Information contained in the reports is entered into OTIS which is operated and 

maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance. OTIS is EPA’s database for the collection, 

maintenance, and retrieval of compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and 

government-owned facilities. EPA uses the OTIS for tracking air pollution compliance and 

enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. 

EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for five

years.

5(c) Small Entity Flexibility
9

A majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the 

impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the 

development of the regulation. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations 

and the types of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are 

the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these to be the minimum 

requirements needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further for small 

entities. To the extent that larger businesses can use economies of scale to reduce their burden, 

the overall burden will be reduced.

5(d) Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is 

shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coke Oven 

Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal).

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and 

reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR. The 

individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the 

concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Wherever appropriate, specific tasks and 

major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.

6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden

The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from these recordkeeping 

and reporting requirements is estimated to be 25,879 hours (Total Labor Hours from Table 1

below). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the 

development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, 

the previously approved ICR, and any comments received.

6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs

(i) Estimating Labor Costs

This ICR uses the following labor rates: 

Managerial $121.42 ($57.82 + 110%) 

Technical $99.14 ($47.21 + 110%)

Clerical $49.81 ($23.72 + 110%)
10

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 

September 2011, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, by occupational and industry group.” The rates are 

from column 1, “Total compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account 

for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

(ii) Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance Costs

The type of industry costs associated with the information collection activities in the 

subject standard are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR and the costs 

associated with continuous monitoring. The capital/startup costs are one time costs when a 

facility becomes subject to the regulation. The annual operation and maintenance costs are the 

ongoing costs to maintain the monitors and other costs such as photocopying and postage.

(iii) Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

(A)

Continuous 

Monitoring 

Device

(B)

Capital/Startup 

Cost for One 

Respondent

(C)

Number of 

New

Respondents

(D)

Total 

Capital/Startup 

Cost, (B X C)

(E)

Annual O&M 

Costs for One 

Respondent

(F)

Number of 

Respondents 

with O&M

(G)

Total O&M,

(E X F)

Leak 

detectors $9,000 0 $0 $500 19 $9,500

Continuous 

Opacity 

Monitors

$37,000 0 $0 $8,421 19 $159,999

Total 

$0 $169,499

The total capital/startup costs for this ICR are $0. This is the total of column D in the 

above table. 

The total operation and maintenance (O&M) costs for this ICR are $169,500 (rounded). 

This is the total of column G. 

The average annual cost for capital/startup and operation and maintenance costs to 

industry over the next three years of the ICR is estimated to be $169,500 combined. These are

the recordkeeping costs. 

6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of the reported 

information. EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program includes activities such as the 
11

examination of records maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of 

emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected information. 

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is estimated to be 

$9,536. 

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

Managerial $62.27 (GS-13, Step 5, $38.92 + 60%) 

Technical $46.21 (GS-12, Step 1, $28.88 + 60%)

Clerical $25.01 (GS-6, Step 3, $15.63 + 60%)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2011 General Schedule,

which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for 

the benefit packages available to government employees. Details upon which this estimate is 

based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coke 

Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal).

6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

Based on our research for this ICR, on average over the next three years, approximately

19 existing respondents will be subject to the standard. It is estimated that no additional

respondents per year will become subject. The overall average number of respondents, as shown 

in the table below is 19 per year. 

The number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the three 

years covered by this ICR. 

Number of Respondents

Year

(A)

Number 

of New

Respondents 1

(B)

Number of 

Existing 

Respondents

(C)

Number of Existing 

Respondents that keep 

records but do not 

submit reports

(D)

Number of 

Existing 

Respondents That 

Are Also New

Respondents

(E)

Number of 

Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)

1 0 19 0 0 19

2 0 19 0 0 19

3 0 19 0 0 19

Average 0 19 0 0 19

1

New respondent include sources with constructed, reconstructed and modified affected facilities

Column D is subtracted to avoid double-counting respondents. As shown above, the 
12

average Number of Respondents over the three year period of this ICR is 19. 

The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the following table: 

Total Annual Responses

(A)

Information Collection Activity

(B)

Number of 

Respondents 

(C)

Number of 

Responses

(D)

Number of Existing 

Respondents That 

Keep Records But Do 

Not Submit Reports

(E)

Total Annual 

Responses 

E=(BxC)+D

Notification of compliance status 0 1 0 0

Notification/application of construction 0

1

0 0

Notification of actual startup 0 1 0 0

Notification of performance test and test 

plan 0 1 0 0

Report of performance test results 6.4 1 0 6.4

Report of semiannual compliance reports 19 2 0 38

Report of quarterly compliance reports 17 4 0 68

Report of startup, shutdown, malfunction 1 1 0 1

Total 113.4

The number of Total Annual Responses is 113 (rounded).

The total annual labor costs are $2,479,750. Details regarding these estimates may be 

found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coke Oven 

Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal).

6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the 

Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, and summarized below. 

(i) Respondent Tally

The total annual labor hours are 25,879 at a cost of $2,479,750. Details regarding these 

estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for 

Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) 

(Renewal). 

Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of 

information is estimated to average 229 hours per response.

The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $169,500
13

combined. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation 

and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

(ii) The Agency Tally

The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is estimated to be 212

labor hours at a cost of $9,536. See below Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost –

NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart 

CCCCC) (Renewal).

6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden

There is an increase in costs for both the respondents and the Agency from the most 

recently approved ICR. The increase in burden cost is due to adjustments in labor rates. 

This ICR uses updated labor rates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to calculate burden costs. 

There is an increase of 33 hours in labor hours for the Agency related to a mathematical 

error in calculating the number of compliance reports per plant per year in the previous ICR. 

There is no change in the estimation methodology for labor hours to the respondents in this ICR 

compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two considerations: 1) the regulations have not 

changed over the past three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three years; and 

2) the growth rate for respondents is very low, negative, or non-existent.

6(g) Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average 229 hours per response. “Burden” means the total time, effort, or 

financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide 

information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; 

develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, 

validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing 

and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable 

instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of 

information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and 

transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control 

Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided 

burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the 

use of automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under 

Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OECA–2011–0269. An electronic version of the public docket is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a copy of the draft 
14

collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the 

contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available 

electronically. When in the system, select “search,” then key in the docket ID number identified 

in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and 

Compliance Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone 

number for the docket center is (202) 566-1927. Also, you can send comments to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, 

Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA Docket ID 

Number EPA–HQ–OECA–2011–0269 and OMB Control Number 2060-0521 in any

correspondence. 

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this 

information.
15

Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR 

Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal)

Burden item

(A) 

Person 

hours per 

occurrence

(B) 

No. of 

occurrences 

per 

respondent 

per year

(C) 

Person 

hours per 

respondent 

per year 

(AxB)

(D) 

Respondents 

per year a

(E) 

Technical 

personhours per 

year 

(CxD)

(F)

Management 

person hours 

per year 

(Ex0.05)

(G) 

Clerical 

person hours 

per year 

(Ex0.1)

(H) 

Total Cost 

Per year b

1. Applications N/A

2. Survey and Studies N/A

3. Acquisition, Installation, and Utilization of 

Technology and Systems 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0

4. Reporting Requirements

A. Read instructions 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0

B. Required activities c, d

 Method 5 performance test e, c 40 1.5 60 6.4 384 19.2 38.4 $42,313.73

 Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0

 Operation and maintenance plans for by-product

 coke oven batteries and capture systems and control

 devices applied to pushing emissions 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0

 Work practice plan for batteries with horizontal 

 flues (one plant) 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 $4,407.68

 Method 9 daily observations for fugitive pushing

 emissions f 2.8 365 1,022 17 17,374 868.7 1,737.4 $1,914,475.81

 Weekly sampling for total dissolved solids (TSD) g

2.3 52 119.6 19 2,272.4 113.62 227.24 $250,400.30

 Monthly inspections and maintenance of affected 

 sources, control devices, and continuous parameter

 monitoring systems e

2 12 24 19 456 22.8 45.6 $50,247.55

C. Create information See 4B

D. Gather existing information See 4B
16

E. Write report

 Notification of applicability

2120

000 $0

 Notification of construction/reconstruction

2120

000 $0

 Notification of anticipated startup

2120

000 $0

 Notification of actual startup

2120

000 $0

 Notification of special compliance

2120

000 $0

 Requirements

 Compliance extension request

2120

000 $0

 Notification of performance test

c

2 1.530

000 $0

 Site-specific test plan 40

1 400

000 $0

 Notification of compliance status

8180

000 $0

 NESHAP waiver application N/A

 Report of performance test 

h

See 4B

 Semiannual compliance reports

h

402 802 1608 16 $17,630.72

 Quarterly compliance reports for battery stacks 

f

124 48 17 816 40.8 81.6 $89,916.67

 Emergency startup, shutdown, or malfunction 

 reports

i

41414 0.2 0.4 $440.77

SUBTOTAL for Reporting Requirements 24,732.36

5. Recordkeeping Requirements

A. Read instructions See 4A

B. Plan activities

3130000 $0

C. Implement activities 12

1 120000 $0

D. Develop record system

3130000 $0

E. Time to enter information

1 52 52 19 988 49.4 98.8 $108,869.70

F. Time to train personnel

3130000 $0

G. Time to adjust existing ways to comply with

 previously applicable requirements3130000 $0

H. Time to transmit or disclose information

j

0.252 0.50 19 9.50 0.48 0.95 $1,046.82
17

I. Time for audits N/A

SUBTOTAL for Recordkeeping Requirements 1,147.13

TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST (Rounded) 25,879 $2,479,750

Assumptions:

a

 There is an average of 19 respondents (i.e., coke plants operating 58 by-product batteries and 10 non-recovery batteries). We have assumed that there will be no 

new sources subject to this regulation. 

b

 This ICR uses the following labor rates: $121.42 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor; $99.14 per hour for Technical labor, and $49.81 

per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2011, “Table 2. Civilian Workers, 

by Occupational and Industry group.” The rates are from column 1, “Total Compensation.” The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit 

packages available to those employed by private industry.

c

 We have assumed that existing respondents have already comply with initial rule requirements and are in full compliance with periodic requirements including 

quarterly and semiannual reports. New respondents would have to comply with the initial rule requirements including notifications and performance tests for addon control devices. 

d Monitoring and recordkeeping of operations for respondents include: monthly inspection of capture and control systems; daily Method 9 observations; weekly 

sampling for dissolved solids for quenching operations; work practices for batteries with horizontal flues (one plant); and Method 5 testing for particulate matter.

e

 The rule requires that every 2.5 years (or 0.4 times per year over the 3 years of the ICR), each control device applied to pushing emissions must be sampled by 

Method 5 for particulate matter. We have determined that there is an average of 1.5 emission points (24 control devices for 16 respondents = 24/16 = 1.5 per 

respondent) that need to be tested. There is an average of 6.4 respondents per year (16*0.4) submitting Method 5 performance test reports. 

f

 Daily Method 9 observations of 4 pushes per battery stacks one hour per day per battery. We have assumed that 38 of the 53 battery stacks at 17 plants will 

have burden that can be attributed to the rule since the other plants were doing this type of monitoring. before the rule. There is an average of 2.8 battery stacks 

per plant required to be tested for Method 9 for the burden calculation although we know that a few plants have a pair of batteries served by one stack. 

g

 The measuring of the total dissolved solids (TDS) in the make-up water used for quenching is a requirement. Since there are about 43 quenching towers 

(average over the 19 respondents is about 2.3 quenching towers per facility).

h The rules requires the submittal of quarterly compliance reports for all battery stacks. If no deviation occurred and no continuous monitoring systems were out 

of control, only a summary report is required. There is an average of 6.4 respondents per year (16*0.4) submitting Method 5 performance test reports. For other 

affected sources, semiannual reports are required for any deviation from an emission limitation (including an operating limit), work practice standard, or O&M 

requirement.

i

 It assumes that one respondent per year will have a startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) occurrence that is not managed according to the SSM plan.

j

 It assumes 15 minutes to transmit recorded information
18

Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost – NESHAP for Coke Oven Pushing, Quenching, and Battery Stacks (40 CFR 

Part 63, Subpart CCCCC) (Renewal)

Burden item

(A)

Person 

hours per 

occurrence

(B) 

No. of 

occurrences 

per plant 

per year

(C) 

Hours per 

plant per 

year (AxB)

(D) 

Plants 

per year 

a

(E) 

Technical 

person- hours 

per year 

(CxD)

(F) 

Management 

person hours 

per year 

(Ex0.05)

(G) 

Clerical 

person hours 

per year 

(Ex0.1)

(H) 

Total Cost 

Per year b

Initial performance test 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0

Repeat performance test-Retesting preparation 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0

Repeat performance- Retesting 40 1 40 0 0 0 0 $0

Report Review

 Notification of construction/reconstruction N/A

 Notification of anticipated startup N/A

 Notification of actual startup N/A

 Notification of special compliance 

requirements N/A

 Notification of initial performance test 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0

 Notification of compliance status d

2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0

 Review of repeat Method 5 performance test 

report f

8 1 8 6.4 51.2 2.56 5.12 $2,653.41 

 Review of semi-annual compliance report d

8 0.4 3.2 19 60.8 3.04 6.08 $3,150.93 

 Review of NESHAP waiver application 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 $0

 Review of quarterly compliance report for

battery stacks f 4 1 4 17 68 3.4 6.8 $3,524.07

 Review of emergency startup, shutdown, and

malfunction report

g

4 1 4 1 4 0.2 0.4 $207.30 

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST 212 $9,536 
19

Assumptions:

b This cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: Managerial 

rate of $62.27 (GS-13, Step 5, $38.92 + 60%), Technical rate of $46.21 (GS-12, Step 1, $28.88 + 60%), and Clerical rate of $25.01 (GS-6, Step 3, $15.63 + 60%). 

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2011 General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay. 

c We have assumed that existing sources have comply with the initial rule requirements. New respondents are required to conduct performance test for add-on 

control equipments, submit initial notifications and prepare startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) plans. 

d Every 2.5 years (or about 0.4 times per year, if average over the three year period of ICR), respondents must sample each emission point using Method 5 for 

particulate matter, and submit a report of results. 

e

 Sources are required to submit semiannual compliance reports and startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) reports if there is an occurrence that is not 

managed according to the SSM plan. 

f The rules requires the submittal of quarterly compliance reports for battery stacks. There is an average of 6.4 respondents per year (16*0.4) submitting Method 5 

performance test reports. 

g It assumes that one respondent will have a startup, shutdown and malfunction (SSM) occurrence that is not managed according to the SSM plan.