alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNon-Classical Stress Concentration Behavior in a Radically Stretched Hyperelastic Sheet Containing a Circular HoleNon-classical stress concentration behavior in a stretched circular hyperelastic sheet (outer radius b = 10 in., thickness t = 0.0625 in.) containing a central hole (radius a = 0.5 in.) was analyzed. The hyperelastic sheet was subjected to different levels of remote radial stretchings. Nastran large-strain large-deformation analysis and the Blatz-Ko large deformation theory were used to calculate the equal-biaxial stress concentration factors K. The results show that the values of K calculated from the Blatz-Ko theory and Nastran are extremely close. Unlike the classical linear elasticity theory, which gives the constant K = 2 for the equal-biaxial stress field, the hyperelastic K values were found to increase with increased stretching and can exceed the value K = 6 at a remote radial extension ratio of 2.35. The present K-values compare fairly well with the K-values obtained by previous works. The effect of the hole-size on K-values was investigated. The values of K start to decrease from a hole radius a = 0.125 in. down to K = 1 (no stress concentration) as a shrinks to a = 0 in. (no hole). Also, the newly introduced stretch and strain magnification factors {K(sub λ),K(sub ε) } are also material- and deformation-dependent, and can increase from linear levels of {1.0, 4.0} and reaching {3.07, 4.61}, respectively at a remote radial extension ratio of 2.35.Document ID20170008001Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKo, William L.*(NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Lung, Shun-Fat*(Jacobs Technology, Inc. Edwards AFB, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 28, 2017Publication DateAugust 1, 2017Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Structural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberAFRC-E-DAA-TN40409NASA/TM-2017-219527Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NND08RR01BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordsstress concentrationdisplacement theoryAvailable DownloadsNameType20170008001.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### *In re*Estate of Artie E. Wood, Deceased.

(No. 73-111;

Fifth District —

August 2, 1973.

James F. Thebeau, Jr., of Granite City, for appellants.

Gary R. Coffey, of Reed, Armstrong, Gorman & Coffey, of Edwardsville, for appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinion of the court:

AppeUant filed a petition to construe the wiU of Artie E. Wood, deceased. The Circuit Court of Madison County entered a judgment finding against the petitioners. The case is here on direct appeal.

The sole issue is whether the trial court ruled correctly in holding that the anti-lapse statute (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 3, sec. 49) applied to the wiU of Artie E. Wood.

In her will executed July 15, 1937, Artie E. Wood provided: “Second, —I give, devise and bequeath unto Pearl A. Knecht and Nora E. Wetzel, two of my sisters, aU of my property, real, personal and mixed that I may own at the time of my death.”

Nora E. Wetzel died on April 3, 1955 leaving two children, Inez Schumacher and Frank Wetzel, the petitioners herein. Pearl A. Knecht survived Artie E. Wood who died November 5, 1971.

The so called anti-lapse statute by its terms applies to this will and we find nothing in the will to indicate an intention of the testatrix that it should not apply. *O’Connell v. Gaffney,*23 Ill.2d 611, 179 N.E.2d 647. *Ingalsbe v. Gouch,*109 Ill.App.2d 232, 248 N.E.2d 522.

Judgment affirmed.

G. MORAN, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
§ 2450.5 Administrative review. ( a ) For a period of 30 days after service thereof upon all parties in interest, the initial classification decision of the State Director shall be subject to the exercise of supervisory authority by the Secretary of the Interior for the purpose of administrative review.
( b ) If, 30 days from receipt by parties in interest of the initial decision of the State Director, the Secretary has not either on his own motion, or motion of any protestant, petitioner-applicant, or the State Director, exercised supervisory authority for review, the initial classification decision shall become the final order of the Secretary.
( c ) The exercise of supervisory authority by the Secretary shall automatically vacate the initial classification decision and the final Departmental decision shall be issued by the Secretary of the Interior and served upon all parties in interest.
( d ) No petitioner-applicant or protestant to a proposed classification decision of a State Director to whom the provisions of this section are applicable shall be entitled to any administrative review other than that provided by this section or to appeal under provisions of parts 1840 and 1850 of this chapter.
### **CHAPTER 38A—INDIAN TRIBAL JUSTICE TECHNICAL AND LEGAL ASSISTANCE**

Sec.
3651.
Findings.
3652.
Purposes.
3653.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE GRANTS

3661.
Tribal justice training and technical assistance grants.
3662.
Tribal civil legal assistance grants.
3663.
Tribal criminal assistance grants.
3664.
No offset.
3665.
Tribal authority.
3665a.
Office of Tribal Justice.
3666.
Authorization of appropriations.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—INDIAN TRIBAL COURTS

3681.
Grants.
3682.
Assistant probation officers.
### §285ee. Fifth capital increase

#### (a) Subscription authorized

(1) The United States Governor of the Bank may subscribe on behalf of the United States to 1,104,420 additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank.

(2) Any subscription by the United States to capital stock of the Bank shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

(1) In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $13,323,173,083, for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(2) Of the amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1)—

(A) $532,929,240 is authorized to be appropriated for paid-in shares of the Bank; and

(B) $12,790,243,843 is authorized to be appropriated for callable shares of the Bank, for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §34, as added Pub. L. 112–10, div. B, title XI, §2126(e), Apr. 15, 2011, 125 Stat. 191.)
### §1151. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–114, §1, Oct. 24, 1967, 81 Stat. 335, which related to membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000740628
<NAME> INTERFERON SCIENCES RESEARCH PARTNERS, LTD.
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
§ 2623.0-3 Authority. ( a ) The first paragraph of section 1 of the Act approved January 25, 1927 (44 Stat. 1026; 43 U.S.C. 870), reads as follows: That, subject to the provisions of paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section, the several grants to the States of numbered sections in place for the support or in aid of common or public schools be, and they are hereby, extended to embrace numbered school sections mineral in character, unless land has been granted to and/or selected by and certified or approved, to any such State or States as indemnity or in lieu of any land so granted by numbered sections.
( b ) The beneficiaries of this grant are the States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. The grant also extends to the unsurveyed school sections reserved, granted, and confirmed to the State of Florida by the Act of Congress approved September 22, 1922 (42 Stat. 1017; 16 U.S.C. 483, 484).
( c ) The additional grant thus made, subject to all the conditions in the statute making same, applies to school-section lands known to be of mineral character at the effective date thereof as hereinafter defined. It does not include school-section lands nonmineral in character, those not known to be mineral in character at time of grant, but afterwards found to contain mineral deposits, such lands not being excepted from the grants theretofore made (Wyoming et al. v. United States, 255 U.S. 489-500, 501, 65 L. ed. 742-748), nor does it include lands in numbered school sections in lieu of or as indemnity for which lands were conveyed to the States first above named, or to the State of Florida with respect to school-section lands coming within the purview of the Act of September 22, 1922, prior to January 25, 1927.
( d ) Determinations made prior to January 25, 1927, by the Secretary of the Interior or the Commissioner of the General Land Office to the effect that lands in school sections were excepted from school-land grants because of their known mineral character do not, of themselves, prevent or affect in any way the vesting of title in the States pursuant to the provisions of the statute making the additional grant.
( e ) Subsection (a) of section 1 of the Act provides:
That the grant of numbered mineral sections under this Act shall be of the same effect as prior grants for the numbered nonmineral sections, and title to such numbered mineral sections shall vest in the States at the time and in the manner and be subject to all the rights of adverse parties recognized by existing law in the grants of numbered nonmineral sections.
§ 2200.0-9 Information collection. ( a ) The collection of information contained in part 2200 of Group 2200 has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.* and assigned clearance number 1004-0056. The information will be used to initiate and complete land exchanges with the Bureau of Land Management. Responses are required to obtain benefits in accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended.
( b ) Public reporting burden for this information is estimated to average 4 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, should be sent to the Division of Information Resources Management (870), Bureau of Land Management, 1849 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20240; and the Paperwork Reduction Project (1004-0056), Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00376-CR

NO. 03-00-00377-CR

NO. 03-00-00378-CR

Jose Antonio Rivera, Appellant

&

Martin Hernandez, Appellant

&

Marcos Antonio Hernandez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NOS. 00-1410-1, 00-1402-1 & 00-1409-1

HONORABLE KEVIN HENDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellants Jose Antonio Rivera, Martin Hernandez, and Marcos Antonio Hernandez

pleaded guilty to evading arrest. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 38.04 (West Supp. 2001). The court

adjudged them guilty and sentenced each to incarceration for thirty days.

Appellants’ retained attorney did not file a brief on appeal. Neither counsel nor

appellants appeared at the hearing ordered by this Court pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 38.8(b)(2). Under the circumstances, we conclude that appellants either no longer desire

to prosecute the appeals or have failed to make the necessary arrangements for filing a brief. See Tex.

R. App. P. 38.8(b)(4).
2

We have reviewed the appellate record and find no fundamental error that should be

considered in the interest of justice. The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

__________________________________________

Mack Kidd, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: June 29, 2001

Do Not Publish
### §7105b. Improving domestic victim screening procedures

#### (a) Victim screening tools

Not later than October 1, 2018, the Attorney General shall compile and disseminate, to all grantees who are awarded grants to provide victims' services under subsection (b) or (f) of section 7105 of this title, information about reliable and effective tools for the identification of victims of human trafficking.

#### (b) Use of screening procedures

Beginning not later than October 1, 2018, the Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall identify recommended practices for the screening of human trafficking victims and shall encourage the use of such practices by grantees receiving a grant to provide victim services to youth under subsection (b) or (f) of section 7105 of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–386, div. A, §107B, as added Pub. L. 115–393, title III, §303(a), Dec. 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5273.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Subsection (f) of section 7105 of this title, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to subsec. (f) of section 107 of Pub. L. 106–386 and was translated as referring to section 7105(f) of this title, which relates to assistance for trafficking victims who are United States citizens and lawful permanent residents. Another subsec. (f) of section 107 of Pub. L. 106–386 amended section 1255 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Duden Duden, Inc., Respondent, v. Frank C. Bowers et al., Constituting the Board of Review of the Town of Eastchester, et al., Appellants. (Proceeding 1.)

Settle order on notice within ten days from the date of this decision. Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.
### §1512. Authorization of appropriations for interest payments

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1985, and for each fiscal year thereafter, an amount which does not exceed $5,500,000 for purposes of making interest payments authorized under this subchapter. Sums appropriated under this section, shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title III, §302, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 82; Pub. L. 98–449, §8, Oct. 4, 1984, 98 Stat. 1725.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–449 amended section generally, substituting provisions authorizing appropriations for payment of interest under this subchapter for provisions authorizing appropriations for the Indian Loan Guarantee and Insurance Fund, interest subsidies and administrative expenses.
Exhibit 4.17


**Supplementary  Agreement**


Agreement" PRC" 23rd





eFuture (Beijing) Information Technology Inc. Party A"





and





Beijing Changshengtiandi Ecommerce Co., Ltd. Party B"





Parties Party





Whereas:





A.
      Party A and Party B entered into    an Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement on January 18, 2011 ("**Cooperation    Agreement"**), pursuant to which Party A agreed to provide Party B with    technical and consulting services according to the terms and conditions    listed in the Cooperation Agreement. Party B agreed to retain Party A's    services and pay service fees ("**Service Fees"**) accordingly.





B.
      According to Clause 2 of the    Cooperation Agreement, the calculation and payment of the Service Fess will    be determined and paid based on the methods set forth in the separate    agreements to be entered into between Party and Party B.





NOW,  THEREFORE,





1.
        Party B is entitled to be exempted    from paying the Service Fees until Party B is profitable;





2.
        Subject to Clause 1 above, during    the term of the Cooperation Agreement, the service fee payable by Party B to    Party A for services rendered according to Clause 1 of the Cooperation    Agreement shall be a fee in RMB determined by the following formula:
            Service Fee Payable = Party B's    Revenue — Turnover Taxes — Party B's Total Costs — Profit to be Retained by    Party B;
          Where:


Party      B's Revenue is revenue received by Party B from third parties in the course      of its ordinary business;


Turnover      Taxes include, but are not limited to, business tax, value-added tax, urban      maintenance and construction tax and education surcharges;


Party      B's Total Costs include all costs and expenses, such as costs of goods sold      and operating costs incurred by Party B for carrying out the business; and


Profit      to be Retained by Party B shall be determined by a reputable certified      public accountant designated by Party A.


During the term of the Cooperation    Agreement, Party A shall have the right to adjust the above Fees at its sole    discretion without the consent of Party B.





3.
      This Agreement shall be considered    an integral part of the Cooperation Agreement, and this Agreement shall have    the same effectiveness as the Cooperation Agreement. Where there is a    conflict between this Agreement and the Cooperation Agreement, this Agreement    shall prevail.





4.
      This Agreement is written in both    Chinese and English language in two copies, each Party having one copy with    equal legal validity; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese    version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail.





IN  WITNESS WHEREOF





Party A: eFuture (Beijing) Information Technology Inc.











Party B:
### SUBCHAPTER XXIX—RED LAKE BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF MINNESOTA
Hardesty

Parraguirre the evening prior to the incident. We conclude that the evidence supporting this conviction, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is sufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as determined by a rational trier of fact. See NRS 200.366(1); Jackson v. Virginia,443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); McNair v. State, 108 Nev. 53, 56, 825 P.2d 571, 573 (1992).

Appellant also claims that his verdicts of guilty as to the sexual assault charge and not guilty as to the burglary charge are inconsistent and are not rationally reconcilable, and therefore they cannot stand. We have held that inconsistent verdicts are permitted when supported by sufficient evidence. See Greene v. State, 113 Nev. 157, 173- 74, 931 P.2d 54, 64 (1997), receded from on other grounds by Byford v. State, 116 Nev. 215, 235, 994 P.2d 700, 713 (2000). As we have resolved appellant's sufficiency challenge against him, we conclude his claim of inconsistent verdicts is without merit. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

,J.

cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Scott W. Edwards Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
(May 14, 1943.)

#### In the Matter of the Estate of Henrietta F. Griggs, Deceased.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
!

!

!

!

!

!

Boise

Lewiston

Pocatello

Twin Falls

Idaho Falls

Coeur d'Alene

Terrestrial Species Divirsity

by Inventoried Roadless Area

13 - 21

22 - 32
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 827.90

 828.00

 830.86

 830.28

 829.95

 829.67

 829.77

 829.56

 829.50

 829.49

 829.40

 829.10

 829.50

 832.68

 830.13

 829.05

 828.62

 828.69

 829.55

 830.00

 830.26

 830.24

 830.08

 829.86

 829.62

 832.04

 835.00

 830.44

 34.94

 35.04

 38.16

 37.51

 37.15

 36.84

 36.95

 36.72

 36.66

 36.65

 36.55

 36.22

 36.66

 40.21

 37.35

 36.17

 35.71

 35.78

 36.71

 37.20

 37.49

 37.47

 37.29

 37.05

 36.79

 39.48

 42.92

 37.69

STORAGE

-0.64

+0.11

+3.11

-0.64

-0.36

-0.31

+0.11

-0.23

-0.07

-0.01

-0.10

-0.33

+0.43

+3.56

-2.87

-1.18

-0.46

+0.08

+0.93

+0.49

+0.29

-0.02

-0.18

-0.24

-0.26

+2.69

+3.44

-5.23

CHANGE

333

707

4,285

2,885

2,310

1,330

958

740

667

689

651

535

917

8,172

6,543

4,595

1,907

1,412

1,217

910

836

719

645

592

579

4,540

11,717

9,967

INFLOW

 20

 20

 2,079

 2,530

 1,814

 804

 223

 177

 20

 15

 20

 20

 20

 5,700

 7,309

 4,550

 1,500

 735

 108

 20

 50

 61

 50

 30

 30

 2,500

 9,300

 11,920

SPILL

 634

 634

 638

 679

 678

 679

 679

 678

 679

 679

 679

 678

 678

 679

 677

 638

 637

 638

 638

 640

 640

 665

 682

 682

 680

 682

 683

 681

OUTLET

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 3

 1

 2

 2

 2

 4

 2

 2

 1

 0

 0

 4

C.F.S.

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .09

 .03

 .06

 .07

 .05

 .12

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 1.89

 1.03

 .74

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .02

 .00

 .02

 1.88

 2.26

 .06

 .02

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 1.39

 1.99

 .05

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

FEBRUARY 2019 RUN DATE: 06/06/2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +2.11 71,358 18,634 51,625 34 .95 11.59

ACRE-FEET +2,110 141,539 36,961 102,398 67

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 102,398

OUTLET

TOTAL

 36,961

 139,359

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 11.59

JULY 1, 2018 24.01

 35.58

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 24.01