25684 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2012 / Notices 

1 In comments made on the interim final sunset 

regulations, a number of parties stated that the 

proposed five-day period for rebuttals to 

substantive responses to a notice of initiation was 

insufficient. This requirement was retained in the 

final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As 

provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the 

Department will consider individual requests to 

extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing 

of good cause. 

Review of the following antidumping 

duty order: 

DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Department contact 

A–570–1104 ...... 731–TA–1103 ... China ...................... Activated Cabron (1st Review) ............... Jennifer Moats, (202) 482–5047. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to Sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statue and Department’s 

regulations, the Department schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Internet 

Web site at the following address: 

‘‘http://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’ All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, and service of 

documents. These rules can be found at 

19 CFR 351.303. 

This notice serves as a reminder that 

any party submitting factual information 

in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify 

to the accuracy and completeness of that 

information. See section 782(b) of the 

Act. Parties are hereby reminded that 

revised certification requirements are in 

effect for company/government officials 

as well as their representatives in all 

AD/CVD investigations or proceedings 

initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See 

Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 

7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim Final 

Rule’’) amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) 

and (2) and supplemented by 

Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Supplemental Interim 

Final Rule, 76 FR 54697 (September 2, 

2011). The formats for the revised 

certifications are provided at the end of 

the Interim Final Rule. The Department 

intends to reject factual submissions if 

the submitting party does not comply 

with the revised certification 

requirements. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties to apply for access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately 

following publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The Department’s regulations on 

submission of proprietary information 

and eligibility to receive access to 

business proprietary information under 

APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304– 

306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties defined in 

section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b) wishing 

to participate in a Sunset Review must 

respond not later than 15 days after the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The required contents of the notice of 

intent to participate are set forth at 19 

CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance 

with the Department’s regulations, if we 

do not receive a notice of intent to 

participate from at least one domestic 

interested party by the 15-day deadline, 

the Department will automatically 

revoke the order without further review. 

See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in the Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Please consult the 

Department’s regulations for 

information regarding the Department’s 

conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please 

consult the Department’s regulations at 

19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 

concerning antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings at the 

Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: April 11, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10446 Filed 4–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–821] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

Thailand: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

an interested party, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene retail carrier bags from 

Thailand. The period of review is 

August 1, 2010, through July 31, 2011. 

As a result of the withdrawal of the 

request for review, the Department is 

rescinding this review. 

DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1757 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 3, 2011, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2012 / Notices 25685 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene retail carrier bags from 

Thailand. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocations in 

Part, 76 FR 61076 (October 3, 2011). 

Based on a request for review from the 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag 

Committee and its individual members, 

Hilex Poly Co., LLC and Superbag 

Corporation (collectively, the 

petitioners), we initiated a review of 

Apple Film Company, Ltd., First Pack 

Co. Ltd., Hi-Pak Company, Ltd., K 

International Packaging Co., Ltd., 

Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Multibax 

Public Co., Ltd., Praise Home Industry, 

Co. Ltd., Siam Flexible Industries Co. 

Ltd., Sombatchai Plastic Industry, Ltd., 

Thai Jirun Co., Ltd., Trinity Pac Co. Ltd., 

T.S.T. Plaspack Co., Ltd., and U. Yong 

Industry Co., Ltd. Id. No other party 

requested a review. 

Rescission of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), the Department will 

rescind an administrative review, ‘‘in 

whole or in part, if a party that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of notice of initiation of the 

requested review. The Secretary may 

extend this time limit if the Secretary 

decides that it is reasonable to do so.’’ 

On October 17, 2011, the petitioners 

withdrew their request for a review of 

the order with respect to First Pack Co. 

Ltd., K International Packaging Co., Ltd., 

Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Praise 

Home Industry, Co. Ltd., Siam Flexible 

Industries Co., Ltd., Thai Jirun Co., Ltd., 

and U. Yong Industry Co., Ltd. On 

December 23, 2011, the petitioners 

requested we extend the 90-day time 

limit for the withdrawal of the request 

for a review. On December 28, 2011, we 

extended the time limit for the 

withdrawal of the request for the review 

until February 29, 2012, based on the 

extraordinary circumstances leading to 

their request. On February 21, 2012, the 

petitioners withdrew their request for a 

review of the order with respect to 

Apple Film Company, Ltd., Hi-Pack 

Company, Ltd., Multibax Public Co., 

Ltd., Sombatchai Plastic Industry, Ltd., 

Trinity Pac Co. Ltd., and T.S.T. Plaspack 

Co., Ltd. Because we received no other 

requests for review of these companies 

and the petitioners withdrew their 

request within the extended time limit 

for the withdrawal of the request for a 

review, we are rescinding the 

administrative review of the order with 

respect to all companies. This rescission 

is in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). The Department intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection within 15 days after 

publication of this notice. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3). Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 26, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10452 Filed 4–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality 

Award Panel of Judges 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app., 

notice is hereby given that there will be 

a meeting of the Panel of Judges of the 

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality 

Award on Wednesday, June 13, 2012. 

The Panel of Judges is composed of 

twelve members prominent in the fields 

of quality, innovation, and performance 

management and appointed by the 

Secretary of Commerce, assembled to 

ensure the integrity of the Baldrige 

Award selection process. The purpose 

of this meeting is to discuss and review 

information received from the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology 

and from the Chair of the Judges Panel 

of the Malcolm Baldrige National 

Quality Award. The agenda will 

include: Overview of the Role of the 

Judges and Scoring Data Reviewed at 

the September 2011 Meeting, 2012 

Baldrige Award Cycle, Conflict of 

Interest, Judges’ Survey of Applicants, 

Judging Process Improvement 

Discussion and Judges’ Mentoring 

Program, and a Baldrige Program 

Update. 

DATES: The meeting will convene on 

Wednesday, June 13, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. 

Eastern time and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. 

Eastern time. The entire meeting will be 

closed. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, Administration Building, 

Lecture Room E, Gaithersburg, 

Maryland 20899. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Harry Hertz, Director, Baldrige 

Performance Excellence Program, 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 

20899, telephone number (301) 975– 

2361. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Assistant Secretary for Administration, 

with the concurrence of the General 

Counsel, formally determined on March 

7, 2011, that the meeting of the Judges 

Panel may be closed in accordance with 

5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) because the meeting 

is likely to disclose trade secrets and 

commercial or financial information 

obtained from a person which is 

privileged or confidential and 5 U.S.C. 

552b(c)(9)(B) because for a government 

agency the meetings are likely to 

disclose information that could 

significantly frustrate implementation of 

a proposed agency action. The meeting, 

which involves examination of Award 

applicant data from U.S. companies and 

other organizations and a discussion of 

these data as compared to the Award 

criteria in order to recommend Award 

recipients, will be closed to the public. 

Dated: April 24, 2012. 

Phillip Singerman, 

Associate Director for Innovation & Industry 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10438 Filed 4–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES