alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 27
                                          U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                                 Central Valley Operations Office

                                                 Tehama-Colusa Canal
                                                         2010

Monthly Deliveries in AF

     Water Users        Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct    Nov    Dec  Total

Colusa County WD          35    105   1080   1385   6677   9423  10466   8782   4284   2953    494    175  45859
Cortina WD                 0      0     24     20    123    175    192    126     54     33      6      0    753
Davis WD                   0      0     51    131    525    638    701    504    170     76     48      0   2844
Dunnigan WD                3     10    156    125   1446   2422   2690   2086   1089    610    212      0  10849
4-M Water District         0      0     22     10    425    412    520    470    258     62      0      0   2179
GCID                      60      0   3052   2054   4241   4907   7521   1479      0     60      0      0  23374
Glenn Valley WD            0      0      0      6    235    415    320    300    112     24      1      0   1413
Glide WD                  43     55     30     37   2189   2535   3557   2618    758     87      0    103  12012
Holthouse WD               0      0      0      0     48     91    236    268    229      9     10      4    895
Kanawha WD                62     60     92    213   3664   6155   8078   6912   2431    458    161      9  28295
Kirkwood WD                0      0      0      4     31     88    102     71     47     12      0      0    355
La Grande WD               0      0      0      0   1104   1228   1356   1178    242      0      0      0   5108
Myers-Marsh MWC            0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0      0
Orland-Artois WD           0      0    322    446   5171   8521  11141   9604   3998   1632    303     53  41191
Westside WD                0      3    556   1004   5287   7169   7223   4703   1844   1063    242      0  29094

Total                    203    233   5385   5435  31166  44179  54103  39101  15516   7079   1477    344 204221

*  Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
**Exhibit 24.1****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     Each director and officer of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Corporation”), whosesignature appears below hereby appoints Donald R. Kimble and Thomas P. Reed, or any of them, as hisor her attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and in any and all capacitiesstated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, theCorporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) for the fiscal year ended December31, 2006, and likewise to sign and file any amendments, including post-effective amendments, to theAnnual Report, and the Corporation hereby also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact andeach of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file the Annual Report and anyamendments thereto in its name and behalf, each such person and the Corporation hereby granting tosuch attorney-in-fact full power of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that suchattorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney, in counterparts ifnecessary, effective as of March 23, 2007.DIRECTORS/OFFICERS:   Signatures Title   /s/ Donald R. Kimble Donald R. Kimble President and Director(Principal Executive Officer)   /s/ Thomas P. Reed Thomas P. Reed Vice President and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   /s/ Richard A. Cheap Richard A. Cheap Director    /s/ Stephen E. Dutton Stephen E. Dutton Director    /s/ Edward J. Kane Edward J. Kane Director    /s/ Roger E. Kephart Roger E. Kephart Director    /s/ James D. Robbins James D. Robbins Director    /s/ Karen D. Roggenkamp Karen D. Roggenkamp Director    /s/ Richard I. Witherow Richard I. Witherow Director
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,266.60

 2,266.76

 2,266.94

 2,267.06

 2,267.18

 2,267.33

 2,267.45

 2,267.59

 2,267.83

 2,268.76

 2,269.32

 2,269.74

 2,270.16

 2,271.24

 2,275.46

 2,277.16

 2,278.10

 2,278.75

 2,279.28

 2,279.65

 2,279.98

 2,280.22

 2,280.60

 2,280.85

 2,281.12

 2,281.33

 2,281.52

 2,281.65

 2,281.79

 2,281.94

 2,282.10

 1,105.8

 1,107.3

 1,109.0

 1,110.2

 1,111.3

 1,112.8

 1,113.9

 1,115.3

 1,117.6

 1,126.6

 1,132.0

 1,136.1

 1,140.2

 1,150.8

 1,192.9

 1,210.2

 1,219.8

 1,226.5

 1,232.0

 1,235.8

 1,239.2

 1,241.8

 1,245.7

 1,248.3

 1,251.2

 1,253.4

 1,255.4

 1,256.7

 1,258.2

 1,259.8

 1,261.5

STORAGE

+1.6

+1.5

+1.7

+1.2

+1.2

+1.4

+1.2

+1.3

+2.3

+9.0

+5.4

+4.1

+4.1

+10.6

+42.1

+17.3

+9.6

+6.7

+5.5

+3.8

+3.4

+2.5

+4.0

+2.6

+2.8

+2.2

+2.0

+1.4

+1.5

+1.6

+1.7

CHANGE

1,179

997

1,065

1,035

889

953

1,181

1,204

1,690

5,063

3,276

2,364

2,222

5,715

21,616

8,954

5,151

3,670

2,987

2,690

2,293

2,054

2,665

1,898

1,792

1,479

1,461

1,415

1,331

1,375

1,210

INFLOW

 358

 221

 187

 438

 302

 226

 600

 526

 527

 524

 515

 301

 153

 374

 389

 242

 293

 292

 223

 755

 567

 792

 655

 582

 366

 365

 454

 726

 583

 579

 346

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 3

 6

 11

 17

 6

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 20

 3

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 0

 12

C.F.S.

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .07

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .56

 .08

 1.60

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.38

 1.59

 .37

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .70

 .26

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2016 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 11, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +157.3 92,874 13,461 0 0 105 .36 6.60

ACRE-FEET +157,300 184,216 26,700 0 0 208

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 26,700

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 26,700

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.60

JULY 1, 2016 17.83

 1,104.2

Table 4

(1) (1)

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 17.83
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 57032)    
                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo*, or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies.  Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

                    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated.  The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors.  Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.  Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information Center website at                     *www.ffiec.gov/​nic/​*.                

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 8, 2004.

**A.  Federal Reserve Bank of New York**                     (Jay Bernstein, Bank Supervision Officer) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:                

*1.  Community Bank System, Inc.*, Dewitt, New York; to engage                     *de novo*                     through its subsidiary Benefit Plans Administrative Services, Inc., Utica, New York, in employee benefits consulting and incidental activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(9)(ii) of Regulation Y.                 

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 17, 2004.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 04-21363 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
#### John E. Baumrucker, Appellee, v. Fred D. Jones et al., Appellants.

Gen. No. 17,404.

1. Appeal and *error*— reservation *of grounds.*No question is presented for review on an appeal from the finding of a court without a jury where the appellant did not submit propositions of law to be held by the court in accordance with Practice Act, § 61 (former act, § 42).

2. *Corporations*— right *of stockholder to inspect hooks.*Under statutes conferring on a stockholder an unlimited right to inspect the books and' papers of a corporation, it is no ground for a refusal to permit an inspection that the stockholder is influenced by improper motives or purposes in desiring to .procure the information. ¿

3. *Corporations*— right *of stockholder to inspect hooks.*A stockholder is not precluded from having an inspection of corporate books and records by the fact that he had negotiated with an officer of thd corporation for the sale of his shares and that such officer had instituted proceedings in chancery for the specific performance of an alleged contract of sale.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. William N. McSurelv, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 1, 1912.

J. N. Heldman and Simon La Grou, for appellants.

McEwen, Weissenback, Shrimski & Meloan, for appellee; James S. McClellan, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

A writ of *mandamus*was awarded appellee, as petitioner, against appellants, as respondents, commanding that the petitioner he permitted to examine the records and hooks of the Fred D. Jones Co., a corporation. There was a trial before the court without a jury. The appellant did not submit propositions *189of law to be held by the court, in accordance with Section 61 of the Practice Act (Section 42 of the former act). It has uniformly been, held that where-such propositions are not submitted ho question of law is presented to the court on appeal for review, the ultimate facts found by the court from the evidence not having been set forth in the bill of exceptions. Hobbs v. Ferguson’s Estate, 100 Ill. 232. The statute of this state gives an unlimited right to stockholders to inspect the books and papers of the corporation. It is no defense that he is influenced by improper motives or purposes to procure the information. Venner v. Chicago City Ry. Co., 246 Ill. 173. The record shows conclusively that title to 100 shares of stock was in Baumrucker at the time of filing his petition. It is true there- is some evidence tending to show that negotiations had been had between bim and Mr. Jones, an officer of the defendant corporation, under which Jones was to acquire the stock, and that Jones had instituted proceedings in chancery seeking the specific performance of the alleged contract. These facts, however, present no defense to the petition for *mandamus.*

*Affirmed.*
#### § 1815.0-3 Authority.

Disaster Relief Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1744).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. 2004N-0045]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Health and Diet Survey—2004 Supplement”  has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Robbins, Office of Management Programs (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1223.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of May 19, 2004 (69 FR 28928), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.  An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.  OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0545.  The approval expires on September 30, 2007.  A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.fda.gov/​ohrms/​dockets.*

Dated: September 22, 2004.

Jeffrey Shuren,

Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-21674 Filed 9-27-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
### §372–1. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–301, §12(a), May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 211

Section, Pub. L. 90–28, title I, June 24, 1967, 81 Stat. 69, provided that, on and after June 24, 1967, hearing officers appointed for Indian probate work did not have to be appointed pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, as amended. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation acts:

May 31, 1966, Pub. L. 89–435, title I, 80 Stat. 181.

June 28, 1965, Pub. L. 89–52, title I, 79 Stat. 185.

July 7, 1964, Pub. L. 88–356, title I, 78 Stat. 284.

July 26, 1963, Pub. L. 88–79, title I, 77 Stat. 107.

Aug. 9, 1962, Pub. L. 87–578, title I, 76 Stat. 345.

Aug. 3, 1961, Pub. L. 87–122, title I, 75 Stat. 256.

May 13, 1960, Pub. L. 86–455, title I, 74 Stat. 104.

June 23, 1959, Pub. L. 86–60, title I, 73 Stat. 92.

June 4, 1958, Pub. L. 85–439, title I, 72 Stat. 155.

July 1, 1957, Pub. L. 85–77, title I, 71 Stat. 257.

June 13, 1956, ch. 380, title I, 70 Stat. 257.

June 16, 1955, ch. 147, title I, 69 Stat. 141.

Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 935, Ch. VII, 68 Stat. 813.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Savings Provision

Pub. L. 101–301, §12(b), May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 211, provided that: "Hearing officers heretofore appointed to preside over Indian probate proceedings pursuant to the proviso repealed by subsection (a) [25 U.S.C. 372–1], having met the qualifications required for appointment pursuant to section 3105 of title 5, United States Code, shall be deemed to have been appointed pursuant to that section."
§ 2641.3 Publication and payment. ( a ) Prior to issuance of a conveyance document, the authorized officer shall publish a notice of realty action in the Federal Register and in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the lands to be conveyed. The notice shall identify the lands proposed for conveyance and contain the terms, covenants, conditions and reservations to be included in the conveyance document. The notice shall provide public comment period of 45 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register. Comments shall be sent to the Bureau of Land Management office issuing the notice.
( b ) The notice of realty action may segregate the lands or interests in lands to be conveyed to the extent that they will not be subject to appropriation under the public land laws, including the mining laws. The segregative effect of the notice of realty action shall terminate either upon the issuance of a document of conveyance or 1 year after the date of publication, whichever occurs first.
( c ) The determination concerning the granting or denial of an application shall be sent by the authorized officer to the applicant and to any party who commented on the application.
( d ) The authorized officer shall advise the applicant whether any balance is due on the payments required of the applicant and of the time within which payment shall be made. Failure to pay the required amount within the allotted time shall constitute grounds for rejection of the application. If the applicant has deposited with the authorized officer an amount in excess of the payments required, the authorized officer shall so advise the applicant and return the excess payment.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Penford
Corporation (the "Company") for the three months ended November 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas D. Malkoski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: January 14, 2003



/s/ Thomas D. Malkoski
----------------------------------------
Thomas D. Malkoski
Chief Executive Officer
[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]                        Exhibit 99.2d




                         Independent Accountants' Report


The Board of Directors
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Assertion of Management of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. (the Company), that the Company complied with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum  servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
Established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures, as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

                               /s/ KPMG LLP

February 21, 2006


[Letterhead of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage]


Assertion of Management of Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A.


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage,
a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (the Company) has complied in all
material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the
Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers.

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond
along with an errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $100 million
and $20 million, respectively.


/s/ Michael J. Heid                             February 21, 2006
--------------------------
Division President, Capital Markets, Finance, & Administration
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


/s/ Franklin R. Codel                           February 21, 2006
---------------------------
Executive Vice President, Finance and Corporate Real Estate
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


/s/ Mary Coffin                                 February 21, 2006
--------------------------
Executive Vice President, Servicing & Post Closing
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


/s/ Cara K. Heiden
---------------------------
Division President, Nat'l Consumer & Institutional Lending
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.