24880 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

upon information furnished by the 

individual concerning his/her own 

activities since it may result in 

inaccurate information and compromise 

ongoing criminal investigations or 

correctional management decisions. 

(6) From subsections (e)(3) because in 

view of BOP’s operational 

responsibilities, the application of this 

provision would provide the subject of 

an investigation or correctional matter 

with substantial information which may 

in fact impede the information gathering 

process or compromise ongoing 

criminal investigations or correctional 

management decisions. 

(7) From subsections (e)(4)(G) and (H) 

because this system is exempt from the 

access provisions of subsection (d) 

pursuant to subsections (j) and (k) of the 

Privacy Act. 

(8) From subsection (e)(4)(I) because 

publishing further details regarding 

categories of sources of records in the 

system would compromise ongoing 

investigations, reveal investigatory 

techniques and descriptions of 

confidential informants, or constitute a 

potential danger to the health or safety 

of law enforcement personnel. 

(9) From subsection (e)(5) because in 

the collection and maintenance of 

information for law enforcement 

purposes, it is impossible to determine 

in advance what information is 

accurate, relevant, timely, and complete. 

Data which may seem unrelated, 

irrelevant or incomplete when collected 

may take on added meaning or 

significance during the course of an 

investigation or with the passage of 

time, and could be relevant to future 

law enforcement decisions. In addition, 

because many of these records come 

from the courts and other state and local 

criminal justice agencies, it is 

administratively impossible for them 

and the Bureau to ensure compliance 

with this provision. The restrictions of 

subsection (e)(5) would restrict and 

delay trained correctional managers 

from timely exercising their judgment in 

managing the inmate population and 

providing for the safety and security of 

the prisons and the public. 

(10) From subsection (e)(8), because to 

require individual notice of disclosure 

of information due to a compulsory 

legal process would pose an impossible 

administrative burden on BOP and may 

alert subjects of investigations, who 

might otherwise be unaware, to the fact 

of those investigations. 

(11) From subsection (f) to the extent 

that this system is exempt from the 

provisions of subsection (d). 

(12) From subsection (g) to the extent 

that this system is exempted from other 

provisions of the Act. 

Dated: April 18, 2012. 

Nancy C. Libin, 

Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer, 

United States Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9774 Filed 4–25–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2012–0072] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Jet Express Triathlon, 

Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie, Lakeside, 

OH 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a temporary safety zone on the 

waters of Lake Erie in the vicinity of 

East Harbor State Park, OH, from 8 a.m. 

until 10 a.m. on September 9, 2012. This 

proposed safety zone is intended to 

restrict vessels from portions of Lake 

Erie during the Jet Express Triathlon. 

This proposed safety zone is necessary 

to protect participants, spectators and 

vessels from the hazards associated with 

triathlon event. 

DATES: Comments and related materials 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before May 29, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2012–0072 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 

5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email ENS Benjamin Nessia, 

Response Department, Marine Safety 

Unit Toledo, Coast Guard; telephone 

(419) 418–6040, email 

Benjamin.B.Nessia@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Renee V. 

Wright, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http:// 

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking (USCG–2012–0072), 

indicate the specific section of this 

document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (via http:// 

www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment submitted online via 

www.regulations.gov, it will be 

considered received by the Coast Guard 

when you successfully transmit the 

comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or 

mail your comment, it will be 

considered as having been received by 

the Coast Guard when it is received at 

the Docket Management Facility. We 

recommend that you include your name 

and a mailing address, an email address, 

or a telephone number in the body of 

your document so that we can contact 

you if we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Proposed Rule’’ and insert 

‘‘USCG–2012–0072’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ 

box. If you submit your comments by 

mail or hand delivery, submit them in 

an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2

by 11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules 24881 

Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2012– 

0072’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. You may also visit the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008 issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

Public Meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting, but you may submit a request 

for one using one of the four methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

Background and Purpose 

The organization Endurance Sports 

Productions is sponsoring a triathlon: A 

bike, swim and run event. The swim 

portion of the event will take place in 

Lake Erie. The participants will begin by 

jumping off the ferry boat JET EXPRESS 

II at the designated position, then swim 

to the dedicated position on shore. This 

swim portion will take place on 

September 9, 2012 at approximately 

8 a.m. and will last about an hour. The 

Captain of the Port Detroit has 

determined that the swim portion of the 

event will pose certain public hazards. 

Such hazards include obstructions to 

the waterway that may cause marine 

casualties and vessels colliding with 

swimmers that may cause death or 

serious bodily harm. 

Discussion of Proposed Rule 

With aforementioned hazards in 

mind, the Captain of the Port Detroit 

believes that a temporary safety zone is 

necessary to ensure the safety of 

participants and vessels during the 

practice, the half triathlon, and the 

triathlon events. This proposed 

temporary safety zone would be 

effective and enforced from 8 a.m. until 

10 a.m. on September 9, 2012. The 

safety zone would encompass all waters 

of Lake Erie within a direct line from 

41–33′–49′′ N, 082–47–8′′ W to 41–33′– 

25′′ N, 82–48′–8′′ W and 15 yards on 

either side of direct line. All geographic 

coordinates are North American Datum 

of 1983 (NAD 83). 

All persons and vessels would have to 

comply with the instructions of the 

Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the 

designated on scene patrol personnel. 

Entry into, transiting, or anchoring 

within the safety zone would be 

prohibited unless authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Detroit or his 

designated on scene representative. The 

Captain of the Port or his designated on 

scene representative may be contacted 

via VHF Channel 16. 

Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on 13 of these statutes or 

executive orders. 

Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, and does not 

require an assessment of potential costs 

and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that 

Order. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under that 

Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the 

regulatory policies and procedures of 

the Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS). We conclude that this proposed 

rule is not a significant regulatory action 

because we anticipate that it will have 

minimal impact on the economy, will 

not interfere with other agencies, will 

not adversely alter the budget of any 

grant or loan recipients, and will not 

raise any novel legal or policy issues. 

The safety zone created by this 

proposed rule will be relatively small 

and enforced for a relatively short time. 

Also, the safety zone is designed to 

minimize its impact on navigable 

waters. Furthermore, the safety zone has 

been designed to allow vessels to transit 

around it. Thus, restrictions on vessel 

movement within that particular area 

are expected to be minimal. Under 

certain conditions, moreover, vessels 

may still transit through the safety zone 

when permitted by the Captain of the 

Port. 

Small Entities 

Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered 

whether this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises 

small businesses, not-for-profit 

organizations that are independently 

owned and operated and are not 

dominant in their fields, and 

governmental jurisdictions with 

populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 

U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule 

would not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities. 

This proposed rule would affect the 

following entities, some of which may 

be small entities: The owners or 

operators of vessels intending to transit 

or anchor in the above portion of the 

Sandusky Bay of Lake Erie near 

Lakeside, OH between 8 a.m. and 10 

a.m. on September 9, 2012. 

This proposed safety zone will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities 

for the following reasons: This proposed 

rule will be in effect for only 

approximately two hours. Also, in the 

event that this temporary safety zone 

affects shipping, commercial vessels 

may request permission from the 

Captain of the Port Detroit to transit 

through the safety zone. Additionally, 

the Coast Guard will give advanced 

notice to the public via a local Broadcast 

Notice to Mariners that the regulation is 

in effect. Moreover, the COTP will 

suspend enforcement of the safety zone 

if the event for which the zone is 

established ends earlier than the 

expected time. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this proposed rule would have 

a significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule so that 

they can better evaluate its effects on 

them and participate in the rulemaking. 

If this proposed rule would affect your 

small business, organization, or 

governmental jurisdiction and you have 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
24882 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules 

questions concerning its provisions or 

options for compliance, please contact 

ENS Benjamin Nessia, Response 

Department, Marine Safety Unit Toledo, 

Coast Guard; telephone (419) 418–6040, 

email Benjamin.B.Nessia@uscg.mil. The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this proposed rule or any policy 

or action of the Coast Guard. 

Collection of Information 

This proposed rule would call for no 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on State or local governments and 

would either preempt State law or 

impose a substantial direct cost of 

compliance on them. We have analyzed 

this proposed rule under that Order and 

have determined that it does not have 

implications for federalism. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this proposed rule elsewhere 

in this preamble. 

Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not affect a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

Protection of Children 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it does not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

Energy Effects 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. We have 

determined that it is not a ‘‘significant 

energy action’’ under that order because 

it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 

likely to have a significant adverse effect 

on the supply, distribution, or use of 

energy. The Administrator of the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs 

has not designated it as a significant 

energy action. Therefore, it does not 

require a Statement of Energy Effects 

under Executive Order 13211. 

Technical Standards 

The National Technology Transfer 

and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 

U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use 

voluntary consensus standards in their 

regulatory activities unless the agency 

provides Congress, through the Office of 

Management and Budget, with an 

explanation of why using these 

standards would be inconsistent with 

applicable law or otherwise impractical. 

Voluntary consensus standards are 

technical standards (e.g., specifications 

of materials, performance, design, or 

operation; test methods; sampling 

procedures; and related management 

systems practices) that are developed or 

adopted by voluntary consensus 

standards bodies. 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination is 

available in the docket where indicated 

under ADDRESSES. This proposed rule 

involves the establishment of a safety 

zone, and thus, paragraph (34)(g) of the 

Instruction applies. We seek any 

comments or information that may lead 

to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapters 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department 

of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

2. Add § 165.T09–0072 as follows: 

§ 165.T09–0072 Safety Zone; Jet Express 

Triathlon, Sandusky Bay, Lake Erie, 

Lakeside, OH. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

temporary safety zone: All waters of 

Lake Erie within a direct line from 41– 

33′–49′′ N 082–47′–8′′ W to 41–33′–25′′ 

N 82–48′–8′′ W and 15 yards on either 

side of direct line. All geographic 

coordinates are North American Datum 

of 1983 (NAD 83). 

(b) Effective and Enforcement Period. 

This regulation will be enforced from 

8 a.m. until 10 a.m. on September 9, 

2012. 

(c) Regulations. 

(1) In accordance with the general 

regulations in section 165.23 of this 

part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring 

within this safety zone is prohibited 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port Detroit, or his designated on-scene 

representative. 

(2) This safety zone is closed to all 

vessel traffic, except as may be 

permitted by the Captain of the Port 

Detroit or his designated on-scene 

representative. 

(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of 

the Captain of the Port Detroit is any 

Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 81 / Thursday, April 26, 2012 / Proposed Rules 24883 

petty officer who has been designated 

by the Captain of the Port to act on his 

behalf. The on-scene representative of 

the Captain of the Port Detroit will be 

aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast 

Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of 

the Port Detroit or his designated on 

scene representative may be contacted 

via VHF Channel 16. 

(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter 

or operate within the safety zone shall 

contact the Captain of the Port Detroit 

or his on-scene representative to obtain 

permission to do so. Vessel operators 

given permission to enter or operate in 

the safety zone must comply with all 

directions given to them by the Captain 

of the Port Detroit or his on-scene 

representative. 

Dated: March 29, 2012. 

J.E. Ogden, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Detroit. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10021 Filed 4–25–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0024; FRL–9664–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; 

Removal of Transcontinental Gas Pipe 

Line Corporation Permit From State 

Implementation Plan 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA proposes to approve the 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the 

Commonwealth of Virginia removing 

the operating permit for the 

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 

Corporation (Transco) Station 175 from 

the Virginia SIP. In the Final Rules 

section of this Federal Register, EPA is 

approving the State’s SIP submittal as a 

direct final rule without prior proposal 

because the Agency views this as a 

noncontroversial submittal and 

anticipates no adverse comments. A 

detailed rationale for the approval is set 

forth in the direct final rule. If no 

adverse comments are received in 

response to this action, no further 

activity is contemplated. If EPA receives 

adverse comments, the direct final rule 

will be withdrawn and all public 

comments received will be addressed in 

a subsequent final rule based on this 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Any parties 

interested in commenting on this action 

should do so at this time. 

DATES: Comments must be received in 

writing by May 29, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2012–0024 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2012–0024, 

Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, 

Office of Air Quality Planning, Mailcode 

3AP30, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2012– 

0024. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through ww.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main 

Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Marilyn Powers, (215) 814–2308, or by 

email at powers.marilyn@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For 

further information, please see the 

information provided in the direct final 

action, with the same title, that is 

located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ 

section of this Federal Register. 

publication. 

Dated: April 12, 2012. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2012–9974 Filed 4–25–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2012–0266; FRL–9665–4] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, San Joaquin 

Valley Unified Air Pollution Control 

District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

revisions to the San Joaquin Valley 

Unified Air Pollution Control District 

(SJVUAPCD) portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern oxides of nitrogen 

(NOX) from solid fuel fired boilers, 

steam generators and process heaters. 

We are approving a local rule that 

regulates these emission sources under 

the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 

(CAA or the Act). We are taking 

comments on this proposal and plan to 

follow with a final action. 

DATES: Any comments must arrive by 

May 29, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 


emcdonald on DSK29S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS