NBSIR 86-3478-4

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Bureau of Standards

Implementation Agreements

Among Participants

of OSINET

Revised July 1987

Research Informafioa Center

iINaiional Bureau of Standards

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899

QclQo

, L7 5 (&

Table of Contents

1. GENERAL INFORMATION .................. 1 1.1 OSINET ................. 1

1 . 2 BENEFITS 1 1.3 ORGANIZATION AND MISSIONS 2 1.4 REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS FOR OSINET MEMBERSHIP 2 1.5 REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS FOR OSINET STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP . 4

1 . 6 VOTING 4

1.7 LIAISON 5

2. PROTOCOLS AND SERVICES 6

2.1 COMMONLY IMPLEMENTED PROTOCOLS AND SERVICES . 6

2.2 SPECIAL INTEREST PROTOCOLS AND SERVICES 6

2.2.1 X. 400 6

2.2.2 FTAM 7

2.3 SOURCES OF IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENTS .... 7

3. X . 25 SERVICES 8

3.1 ACCUNET (sm) PACKET SERVICE 8

3.2 WANGPAC 11

4. SITE CONFIGURATION, LOCATION, PROTOCOLS, AND POINT OF CONTACT 20

4.1 U.S. Army Communications 20

4.2 U. S. Dept, of Agriculture 20

4.3 AT&T Communications 20

4.4 Boeing Computer Services . 20

4.5 Charles River Data Systems 21

4.6 Defense Communications Agency 21

4.7 Defense Logistics . 21

4.8 Digital Equipment Corporation ... 21

4.9 General Motors 22

4.10 Hewlett Packard 22

4.11 Honeywell Bull 22

4.12 IBM 23

4.13 International Computers, Ltd . 24

4.14 The MITRE Corporation 25

4.15 National Bureau of Standards 25

4.16 Department of Navy 26

4.17 NCR 26

4.18 Retix 27

4.19 Sun Microsystems 27

4.20 TASC . 27

4.21 Touch Communications 27

4.22 Unisys. 28

4.23 Wang 28

4.24 The Wollongong Group ...... 29

l
5. PROGRAM OF WORK 30

5.1 INITIAL PROJECTS 30

5.1.1 Initial Connectivity 30

5.1.2 NIC Services 30

5.1.3 DoD Transition to the Use of OSI 31

5.1.4 X.400 Message Handling Systems 31

5.1.5 Directory Services 35

6. POINTS OF CONTACT 36

6.1 POINTS OF CONTACT FOR COMMITTEES 36

6.2 POINTS OF CONTACT FOR X.25 SERVICES 36

REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY 37

APPENDIX A: NETWORK ADDRESSING INFORMATION 40

APPENDIX B: FTAM INTEROPERABILITY TESTS 41

READER RESPONSE FORM 45
1 . GENERAL INFORMATION

This is a standing document that is revised several times a year following

meetings of the OSINET Technical and Steering committees.

1.1 OSINET

The OSINET is an international resource has been established to foster the

development of Open Systems Interconnection. Specifically, it has the

following objectives:

o Provide an open network environment for research and

development by implementors and users of OSI protocols.

o Cooperative participant-to-participant testing.

o Assist in the development of test services.

o Conduct OSI research to provide results to ISO and CCITT.

o Companies shall not be discouraged from demonstrating products.

No positive actions will be taken to demonstrate functionally

enhanced prototype protocols as suggested by the NCC and

AUTOFACT demonstrations.

The OSINET is geographically distributed. Long-haul services are provided by

private and/or public subnetworks offering CCITT Recommendation X.25. Local

environments will include standard LANs and other subnetworks.

1 . 2 BENEFITS

Perhaps the most beneficial aspect of OSINET comes about through collaboration

of the participants so that there is a direct transfer to participating

companies of the testing methods and sample software.

Companies may participate at a level of effort commensurate with corporate

interests, upon satisfying the minimum requirements of participation.

Companies may use the OSINET to demonstrate OSI capabilities from their

corporate location(s).

Companies may access the OSINET from conference exhibitions to reach a rich

set of demonstrable applications.

Companies may participate in a wide variety of network-related experiments

(as they choose) including studies of protocol correctness and performance and

network management.
1.3 ORGANIZATION AND MISSIONS

The embodiment of OSINET consists of three entities.

1. The OSINET network itself, comprised of subnetworks, intermediate

systems, and end systems,

2. An OSINET Steering Committee and,

3. An OSINET Technical Committee.

The mission of OSINET is to facilitate the distributed development and testing

of OSI based products by cooperating vendors and users of OSI.

The mission of the OSINET Steering Committee is to establish and manage

OSINET. The Steering Committee determines and approves all OSINET projects.

The mission of the Technical Committee is to carry out the technical work

assigned by the Steering Committee.

1.4 REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS FOR OSINET MEMBERSHIP

o A participating company may either:

a - provide an end system on OSINET that

supports the common set of protocols specified in

Section 2.1 of this document (This ensures that all

participants can communicate with each other over

OSINET. Other protocols supported are optional and

depend upon the companies' interests.), or

b - provide an intermediate system that supports

the agreements of Section 2.1.

o An organization electing to join OSINET should expect to provide an operational end system or intermediate system on OSINET within six

months of the date of joining.

o To maintain eligibility in OSINET, companies must attend three

of the most recent four meetings of the Implementors' Workshop.

Otherwise, companies may be admitted to OSINET by the Steering

Committee on the basis of other significant participation.

o OSINET participants are expected to maintain a certain level of

participation in OSINET projects.

o Participants shall maintain an implementation level reasonably

current as determined by Steering Committee projects.

2
o Personnel and other in-house resources are determined by the

participating company, after fulfilling obligations implied by

the above items

.

o Initial suppliers of the backbone X.25 service are AT&T and

Wang. Additional suppliers of X.25 service who wish to join

OSINET are required to insure that OSINET connectivity is

maintained. This can be accomplished by means of X.75 links to

existing X.25 suppliers, by providing an intermediate system

that uses the routing and relaying functions of the CLNP to link

to an existing X.25 network, or by arranging for another

participant to provide the necessary intermediate system to

link to an existing X.25 network.

o Costs associated with the installation, monthly charges, and

traffic charges depend upon the X.25 service selected for an end

or intermediate system that is directly attached to an X.25

service, and how that end or intermediate system is used. See

Section 3, X.25 Services.

o Network Information Center (NIC) services, such as directory

services, are being discussed. Should such services be adopted

by the participants, NBS has agreed to serve as a NIC. Costs

for development and operation of NIC services would be shared by

companies using the services.

o A commitment, on company letterhead, to join OSINET must be sent

to Jerry Mulvenna at NBS, Building 225, Room B217, Gaithersburg,

MD, 20899.

3
1.5 REQUIREMENTS AND COSTS FOR PSINET STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP

o A company desiring to participate as a member of the OSINET

Steering Committee must be an OSINET member in good standing as defined in section 1.4 of this document.

o The number of Steering Committee member companies shall be

limited to 25. This number may be revised downward by action of

the Steering Committee, should this be necessary to achieve

optimum function of the Committee.

o Each company may send one representative to meetings. A

management level representative is required. To provide needed

continuity, consistent participation by the same representative

is requested.

o Any company which has missed two out of three consecutive

meetings of the Steering Committee will lose its Steering

Committee membership at the next Steering Committee meeting.

o Any company which is not a member in good standing of OSINET, as described elsewhere in this document, will lose its membership

on the Steering Committee at the next Steering Committee

meeting

.

o Effective 1987, seats will be vacated by action of the Committee

at the last regular meeting of each calendar year. Voluntary

release of company seats will be sought.

o Effective 1987, a nominating committee will be established at

the last regular meeting of each year to propose candidates for

membership at the next regular meeting.

o Effective 1988, applications for membership on the Steering

Committee will be proposed annually by the nominating committee,

for consideration at the first regular meeting of each calendar

year

.

o OSINET members and invited guests are permitted at the Steering

Committee meetings. At its discretion, the Steering Committee

may choose to close its meetings, or limit participation to

members

.

o No additional cost beyond those identified in section 1.4 will

be charged to members of the Steering Committee.

1 . 6 VOTING

There is one vote allowed for each OSINET participating company. In order

for a vote to be valid, the majority voting must vote yes or no. If the

majority abstains, the vote does not count.

4
1.7 LIAISON

The Steering Committee shall liaise with other organizations on matters of

policy and OSINET management. The Technical Committee shall liaise with

other organizations on matters of technical interest.

5
2. PROTOCOLS AND SERVICES

2.1 COMMONLY IMPLEMENTED PROTOCOLS AND SERVICES

Participants have agreed that all end systems on the OSINET shall be able to

communicate with each other for purposes of OSINET administration and for

access to common OSINET services. Having made that agreement, it is therefore

necessary to agree to a common set of protocols to provide that communication

service.

All end systems will support ISO connectionless internetwork protocol, the

ISO transport class 4 protocol, and the ISO session protocol (basic combined

subset with full duplex) . These protocols will be supported from at least

March 1986 through March 1989 by companies that are participating during that

time period. The backbone subnetwork service is CCITT Recommendation X.25

presently provided by ATT's ACCUNET and WANG's WANGPAC. An end system may

attach directly to either of these services. An end system may instead use

the IEEE CSMA/CD or Token Bus or some other subnetwork and communicate through

an intermediate system attached to either X.25 service. Implementation

specifications for the above protocols are as defined in Implementation

Agreements Among Implementors of OSI Protocols, NBSIR 86-3385.

The above protocols shall be used to access OSINET services. Services

presently being studied include a bulletin board, a host name server, an application directory, a site contacts list, and test results from network

management experiments.

The above agreement is not intended to preclude experiments with, and tests

and demonstrations of, implementations of other conforming sets of OSI

protocols within the framework provided by OSINET. However, all OSINET

projects must be approved by the Steering Committee.

2.2 SPECIAL INTEREST PROTOCOLS AND SERVICES

Aside from all participants being able to communicate and access OSINET

services, various subsets of participants are interested in other protocols

and services. Two are identified below.

2.2.1 X.400

Participants wishing to use electronic mail on OSINET shall use MHF and ISO

session (basic activity subset) as defined in NBSIR 86-3385. These protocols

shall operate over the class 4 transport service as defined in NBSIR 86-3385.

2.2. 1.1 Goals of OSINET Message Project

1. To provide a basis for conducting interoperability testing of ISO standard

(X.400) messaging implementations among OSINET participants.

6
2. To verify that the X.400 functional standard defined by the NBS OSI

Implementor's Workshop agreements is a complete and unambiguous specification for interoperation; and to provide appropriate feedback to that SIG.

3. To provide expanded communication among OSINET participants thru the use

of electronic mail over OSINET.

4. To promote and publicize the use of X.400 messaging protocols.

5. To encourage the use of OSINET for communication among OSI Workshop

participants

.

2.2.2 FTAM

Participants have agreed to support ISO FTAM. The version of FTAM that will

be supported is specified in the May 1986 version of NBSIR 86-3385. The FTAM

interoperability tests required to be run by each new system that joins OSINET

are listed in Appendix B.

2.3 SOURCES OF IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENTS

The long-haul services are presently provided by ACCUNET and WANGPAC. Since

OSINET is intended to be international, it is expected that there will be

other X.25 service providers in Europe and North America. It is hoped that

the various X.25 services will evolve to a common version of CCITT

Recommendation X.25, 1984.

The NBS/OSI Workshop for Implementors of OSI Protocols is an open

international forum comprised of computer manufacturers, semiconductor

manufacturers, common carriers, and industry and government users. It was established for the purpose of reaching implementation agreements on evolving

standards from IEEE, ISO, and CCITT.

The OSINET participants have elected to implement protocols for OSINET

according to the implementation specifications developed in that workshop.

See NBSIR 86-3385.

It is expected that other forums and organizations might produce

implementation specifications for standard protocols. The OSINET will make

use of such specifications where its members have a commercial or research

interest in them and when they are reviewed and approved in an international,

open forum, and projects making use of them have been approved by the

Steering Committee.

7
3. X . 25 SERVICES

3.1 ACCUNET (sm) Packet Service

ACCUNET (sm) Packet Service, offered by AT&T Communications, provides low

delay/high throughput packetized data transmission with high reliability and

availability. The service conforms to the DCE procedures set forth in the

1980 version of the CCITT Recommendation X.25. It supports the essential (E)

services and facilities of X.25 as well as some additional (A) features.

Access to the service is provided separately by DATAPHONE (R) Digital Service

(DDS), with the DDS Channel Service Unit (CSU), or a 4 wire analog point-topoint private line type 3002 channel. Digital access is supported at 4.8,

9.6, or 56 kbps; analog access is supported at 4.8 or 9.6 kbps (9.6 kbps

analog access may require conditioning). ACCUNET Packet Service supports

software controlled logical channels that enable multiple simultaneous calls

over a single physical access line: 127 such calls at speeds of 4.8 and 9.6

kbps, and as many as 511 at 56 kbps.

Currently ACCUNET Packet Service is deployed in the following cities:

Akron Greenville Philadelphia

Albany Harrisburg Phoenix

Albuquerque Hartford Pittsburgh

Anaheim Houston Portland, ME

Appleton Huntsville Portland, OR

Atlanta Indianapolis Poughkeepsie

Austin Jackson Providence

Baltimore Jacksonville Raleigh

Birmingham Kalamazoo Reno

Boise Kansas City Richmond, VA

Buffalo Knoxville Roanoke

Cambridge Lansing Rochester

Camden Lexington Sacramento

Cedar Rapids Little Rock St. Louis

Charlotte Los Angeles Salinas

Chattanooga Louisville Salt Lake City

Chicago Madison San Antonio

Cincinnati Manchester San Diego

Cleveland Memphis San Francisco

Colorado Springs Miami (OJUS) Seattle

Columbia Minneapolis Shreveport

Columbus Mobile Spokane

Dallas Nashville Springfield, MA

Davenport New Haven Stockton

Dayton New Orleans Syracuse

Denver New York City Tampa

Des Moines Newark Toledo

Detroit Norfolk Tucson

Eugene Oakland Tulsa

8
Fresno

Ft . Wayne

Grand Rapids

Greensboro

Oklahoma City

Omaha

Orlando

Peoria

Washington, D.C.

West Palm Beach

White Plains, N.Y.

Youngstown

In addition, ACCUNET Packet Service provides international access to other

X.25 packet networks in the following countries:

Australia

Belgium

Bermuda

Canada

France

Hong Kong

Ireland

Italy

Jamaica

Japan

Netherlands

Singapore

Spain

Sweden

Switzerland

United Kingdom

West Germany

ACCUNET Packet Service supports six different options for the assignment of

DTE addresses to access lines. The most common of these is that an access

line will have a single address assigned to it. Another option, which some participants may find useful, allows multiple addresses to be assigned to a single access line. Users may request from 1 to 10 blocks of 100 addresses to

be assigned to their access line. More specific information on all six

addressing options can be found in the AT&T Technical Reference PUB 54010.

Participants in OSINET should let their AT&T Account Executive know which

option meets their particular needs when ordering ACCUNET Packet Service.

ACCUNET Packet Service provides Virtual Call and Permanent Virtual Call

services, both based on the logical channel concept. By means of Virtual Call

Service set-up/clearing procedures, logical channels can be established and

terminated on demand. Permanent Virtual Call Service eliminates the time

required to set-up and clear each call by establishing permanent logical

associations (not available for Virtual Calls) when the service is ordered.

These remain in place until other service arrangements are ordered. For

OSINET, AT&T is recommending that all logical channels be established by

Virtual Calls.

Both Virtual Call and Permanent Virtual Call services offer a wide range of

software functions to increase control over circuit parameters, set-up, and

functional attributes. Packet sizes of 123 and 256 octets as well as window

sizes of 2 and 3 packets are supported.

Logical channels may be established as either two-way or one-way outgoing.

For OSINET, AT&T is recommending that logical channels are established only as two-way and, while it is possible to bar either incoming or outgoing calls on

all logical channels, that these facilities not be provisioned.

Throughput class negotiation permits negotiation on a per call basis of the

throughput classes for each direction of data transmission. Throughput

classes up to and including 9600 bps are supported by ACCUNET Packet Service,

limited only by access line speed. For OSINET, AT&T is recommending that the

throughput class negotiation facility be provisioned.

9
Flow control parameter negotiation permits negotiation on a per call basis of

the flow control parameters, window size and packet size, for each direction

of data transmission. The default window size of 2 packets and packet size of

128 octets can be modified if both DTEs wish to use larger values and

subscribe to this facility. For OSINET, AT&T is recommending that the flow

control parameter negotiation facility be provisioned.

The fast select facility allows DTEs to send up to 128 octets of data in the

Call Request packet and receive up to 128 octets of user data from the called

DTE in a Call Connected or a Clear Indication packet, if issued in direct

response to the Call Request packet. The facility may be requested on a per

call basis. The fast select acceptance facility authorizes the network to

transmit to the DTE Incoming Call packets which request the fast select

facility. For OSINET, AT&T is recommending that the fast select acceptance be

provisioned.

Table 1 lists performance parameters and typical values which may be

encountered by users of ACCUNET Packet Service. These performance parameters

and typical values are published by AT&T Communications as a guide for the

designers, manufacturers, consultants, and suppliers of systems and equipment

which would connect to the X.25 interface. The performance values are based

on design objectives and reflect typical network performance from one X.25

packet switch interface to another X.25 packet switch interface. As such,

these values do not reflect delays associated with access lines to/from the

packet switch. They are typical, but are not meant to imply a guarantee of

quality or grade of service.

Additional information is available in the following AT&T Communications

Technical References:

PUB 54010, "X.25 Interface Specifications and Packet

Switching Capabilities," (May, 1986)

PUB 54012, "X.75 Interface Specifications and Packet

Switching Capabilities," (May, 1986)

They are available from:

AT&T Customer Information Center

Commercial Sales Rep.

P. 0. Box 19901 11202

Indianapolis, IN 46219

1-800-432-6600 (Operator 101)

TABLE 1

ACCUNET Packet Service Network Performance Specifications

THROUGHPUT Virtual Circuit Data Transfer 95% of ThroughRate put Class

10
AVAILABILITY Scheduled Hours of Service 24 hours/day

7 days/week

Loss of Service 3 hours per

interface per

year

Meantime to Restore Service 5 hours

( average

)

BLOCKING Service Blocking Less than 1%

DELAY Call Set-up 480 ms (Average

Busy Hour)

Data Transfer Delay

(40 octets)

135 ms (Average

Busy Hour)

MALFUNCTION Rate of Incorrect Packet 1 per 10 million

packets sent

Restart Rate 5 per interface

per year

3 . 2 WANGPAC

The following information has been provided by WANG.

An Overview To WanqPac

WangPac is a packet switching network service offered by Wang Information

Service Corporation (WISC) a wholly owned subsidiary of Wang Laboratories, of

Lowell, Massachusetts.

Implemented over 18 months ago to serve the internal worldwide data

communications requirements of Wang Laboratories, WangPac is based on the

international packet switching technology standard of X.25. We support the

common set of protocols OSINET requires.

Designed with excess capacity, Wang Laboratories currently uses less than 7%

of the network. It is this excess capacity that we are making available to

OSINET users as well as our commercial customers. The current configuration

of the network has more than 60 locations serving in excess of 200 hosts with

10,000 users. WangPac has increased its users productivity and has provided

a cost effective means of centralized support and controlled growth.

Access Protocols

WangPac currently supports the following non-X.25 access protocols.
3270

2780/3780

ASYNC

SNA

Network Operations Center

The NOC located in Lowell, Massachusetts, is the network's command center.

Operators have the ability to perform remote diagnostics and performance

analysis on lines and nodes in the network. When a problem develops, they

coordinate and dispatch support and maintenance ensuring efficent network

operations

.

We have installed X.25 packet switching nodes in the following locations:

WangPac Domestic/Foreign PSN Locations

Atlanta, Georgia

Bloomfield, Michigan

Boston, Massachusetts

Brussels, Belgium

Burlington, Massachusetts

Culver City, California

Century City, California

Coral Gables, Florida

Chelmsford, Massachusetts

Chesapeake, Virginia

Cincinnati, Ohio

Dallas, Texas

Des Moines, Iowa

Englewood, Colorado

Farmington, Connecticut

Greensboro, North Carolina

Haverhill, Massachusetts

Hong Kong

Honolulu, Hawaii

Houston, Texas

Independence, Ohio

Limerick, Ireland

London, England

Lowell, Massachusetts

Lawrence, Massachusetts

Marina Del Ray, California

Methuen, Massachusetts

Newport Beach, California

New York City, New York

Oakbrook, Illinois

Oakland, California

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Phoenix, Arizona

Portland, Oregon

Princeton, New Jersey

Puerto Rico

Rochester, New York

Rockville, Maryland

Rolling Meadows, Illinois

Rosslyn, Virginia

Rutherford, New Jersey

Salt Lake City, Utah

San Diego, California

San Francisco, California

Seattle, Washington

Shaumberg, Illinois

Singapore

St. Louis, Missouri

Stanford, Connecticut

Sydney, Australia

Tampa, Florida

Tewsbury, Massachusetts

Wayne, Pennsylvania

12
INTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS AND PACKET SWITCHING ATTRIBUTES

This section describes the X.25 interface protocol currently supported by

WISC's WangPac packet switching network.

Recommendation X.25 [1] of the International Telegraph and Telephone

Consultative Committee (CCITT) specifies the interface between Data Terminal

Equipment (DTE) and Data Circuit Terminating Equipment (DCE) for terminals or hosts operating in packet mode on public data networks (PDNs). FIPS

100/Federal Standard 1041 [2] specifies the general use of X.25 for the

United States government. This standard defines some choices left open in

Recommendation X.25. WangPac follows procedures that are in compliance with

FIPS 100/Fed. Std. 1041 in areas where Recommendation X.25 allows a choice.

I NTERFACE SPECIFICATIONS AND PACKET SWITCHING ATTRIBUTES

The interface described in this document is compliant to the DCE procedures

set forth in the 1980 version of CCITT Recommendation X.25 and FIPS 100/Fed.

Std. 1041 dated July 6, 1983.

This document provides information on the specific X.25 features currently

supported including:

o X.25 parameter values

o action taken in areas where Recommendation X.25 offers a choice

o unique features not presently in Recommendation X.25 of FIPS 100/Fed. Std.

1041

This document assumes the reader is familiar with CCITT Recommendation X.25

and FIPS 100/Fed. Std. 1041. Information contained within is meant to be used

with the text of both of these documents.

The WangPac Network

WangPac provides a value added packet switched transport service between user

interfaces. The WangPac network, (figure 2.1), consists of packet switching

nodes (PSNs), packet assembler/disassemblers (PADs), interconnecting trunk

lines, and packet switch access points for user connections. The user packet

switch points can support access at 56kbps, 48kbps, 19.2kbps, 14.4kbps,

9.6kbps, 4.8kbps, 2.4kbps, and 1.2kbps.

WangPac network interface supports Levels 1, 2, and 3 of the DCE side of FIPS

100/Fed. Std. 1041 and 1980 CCITT Recommendation X.25 protocol for Virtual

Call and Permanent Virtual Circuit Services.

Access to Public Data Networks

Within the United States, WangPac supplies Virtual Call and Permanent Virtual

Circuit Services between DTEs.

13
For foreign countries. Virtual Call services are provided to most public

packet networks worldwide.

Outline of WangPac X.25 Packet Switch Interface Protocol

WangPac supports three physical interface standards: RS-232C, RS-449, and

V.35 at clock rates form 1.2 to 56 kilobits per second (kbps).

The link level protocol supports the Link Access Procedure Balanced (LAPB)

procedure

.

WangPac packet level interface supports both Switch Virtual Call (SVC) and

Permanent Virtual Circuit (PVC) services.

WangPac supports the standard default level attributes specified in CCITT

Recommendation X.25 of 128 octets for maximum size of the user data field,

modulo 8 packet sequence numbering, and packet level window size of 2.

Most facilities designated by FIPS 100/Fed. Std. 1041 are supported by

WangPac. In addition, WangPac provides Fast Select and Fast Select Acceptance

support for virtual calls.

Additional facilities and capabilities are under consideration.

At the end of this section, there is a summary of WangPac ' s X.25 packet switch

interface

.

WangPac X.25 Packet Switch Interface Attributes

This section describes switched virtual call (SVC) service and permanent

virtual circuit (PVC) service, network addressing, and self-test capability.

SVC Service

Switch virtual call service procedures and formats are in accordance with

those specified in CCITT Recommendation X.25 and FIPS 100/Fed. Std. 1041. SVC

service provides:

o interface initialization

o call setup and clearing

o flow control

o sequenced data transfer.

14
PVC Service

The capabilities described in section 5.1 hold true for permanent virtual

circuits except for call setup and clearing. PVCs do not require calls.

Facilities for PVCs are set at subscription time.

Network Addressing

Addresses are assigned to the user by the WangPac administration. The address

format utilized is consistent with CCITT Recommendation X.121.

All addresses are 12 or 14 digits in length. The 14 digit length includes 2 digits for subaddressing.

Two types of addressing are supported, physical addressing and logical

addressing

.

Physical addressing allows the indentif ication of the exact endpoint the user

wishes to reach.

Logical addressing allows referencing hosts by either their physical address

or by one or more location-independent logical addresses. It also gives the

host control over which of the logical addresses it can be accessed by (this

is optional for the host machine to implement). The logical address is 7 digits long and is mapped by the network into a physical address. There may

be multiple logical addresses assigned to a single physical address or multiple physical addresses with the same logical address. The network can also translate the logical address into a physical address in the incoming

call packet so the host sees only a physical address.

In the case of multiple physical addresses tied to a single logical address,

there are three selection criteria that can be used:

o Ordered List: this method selects the first active port always

searching from the beginning of the list.

o Shortest Distance: using the list of all active ports, select the

destination physical address with the shortest routing

distance from the source.

o Round Robin: select the first active port starting the search from

the last successfully selected port. The list will be

viewed as a circular list.

Note: only active physical ports can be selected and a logical address can only have one selection criteria associated with it.

15
WangPac X.25 User Facility Support

WangPac supports many of the facilities described in Recommendation X.25 and

FIPS 100/Fed. Std. 1041. Each section below describes a facility and the

WangPac implementation.

Closed User Group

This facility is assigned by WangPac Administration. It allows DTEs to

restrict outgoing and incoming access to a "group” of registered DTEs. A DTE

may belong to a single group or a number of groups.

Each group is assigned a two digit index number in the range of 00-99. DTEs

will use the index number as part of the closed user group facility request

to identify the particular closed user group associated with the call request.

DTEs subscribed to only one CUG are not required to use the facility, WangPac

will insert the facility into the call request packet automatically.

Throughput Class Negotiation

This facility permits negotiation on a per call basis of the throughput

classes for data transmission. The throughput class requested in the call

request packet is validated against the configured line speed. If the value

requested is less than or equal to the line speed, the call is permitted,

else the call is cleared.

The incoming call packet presents the DTE with the lesser of the calling DTE's

requested value or the maximum throughput class for the called DTE. The value

in the call connect packet must be less than or equal to the value requested

in the call request packet.

The negotiated value must be the same for both directions. There is no guarantee of performance with throughput negotiation.

Flow Control Negotiation

This facility permits on a per call basis, negotiation of packet and window

sizes. The values negotiated must be the same in both directions. WangPac

defaults have a packet size of 128 octets and window size of 2 . If no packet

size or window size is requested, these values are in effect.

WangPac allows packets sizes of 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, and 1024 octets to

be negotiated.

Window sizes of 1-7 may be negotiated.

One Way Logical Channel Outgoing

This facility is set by WangPac Administration. It allows a user to set aside

a logical channel or channels to be used exclusively for outgoing calls. The

user must specify the logical channel(s) that will be used for this service.

16
One Way Logical Channel Incoming

This facility is set by WangPac Administration. It allows a user to set

aside a logical channel or channels to be used exclusively for incoming calls.

The user must specify the logical channel(s) that will be used for this

service

.

Outgoing Calls Barred

This facility is set by WangPac Administration. It prevents outgoing calls

to be made for a DTE. This is equivalent to specifying all logical channels

as being One Way Logical Channels Incoming.

Incoming Calls Barred

This facility is set by WangPac Administration. It prevents incoming calls

to be made fo a DTE. This is equivalent to specifying all logical channels

as being One Way Logical Channels Outgoing.

Fast Select

The DTE may request this facility on a per call basis in the call request

packet. The calling DTE is allowed up to 1024 octets of user data to be

included in the call request packet and up to 1024 octets of user data to be

received in the call connected packet or clear indication packet ( if issued

in direct response to the call request) from the called DTE. This facility

must be requested by the subscriber, it is not activated in the standard

conf iguration

.

Fast Select Acceptance

This facility is set by WangPac Administration. It empowers WangPac to

transmit to the DTE incoming call packets which contain the fast select

facility. If a DTE does not subscribe to this facility, WangPac will not pass

on the DTE incoming call packets with the fast select facility. This

facility must be requested by the subscriber, it is not activated in the

standard configuration.

This facility is set by WangPac Administration. It allows a user to make

call request containing the reverse charging facility. If the access port is

not configured for reverse charging and a DTE issues a call request packet

with the reverse charging facility, the call is cleared. This facility must

be requested by the subscriber, it is not activated in the standard

conf iguration

.

Reverse Charging Acceptance

This facility is set by WangPac Administration. It authorizes WangPac to

transmit to the DTE incoming call packets which contain the reverse charging

facility. If a DTE does not subscribe to this facility, WangPac will clear

all calls destined to the DTE that contain the reverse charging facility.

17
This facility must be requested by the subscriber; it is not activated in the

standard configuration.

RPOA Selection

The DTE may request this facility on a per call basis. It allows the calling

DTE, in the call request packet, to specify the particular Recognized Private

Operating Agency (RPOA) transit network through which the call is to be

routed.

Reverse Charging

SUMMARY OF WANGPAC INTERFACE FEATURES

Feature

Level 1 (Physical Level)

transmission access:

interface types:

Level 2 (Link Level)

procedure

parameter K:

parameter Nl:

parameter N2:

timer T1 DCE

:

parameter T2 (DCE):

(worst case)

sequencing

:

Level 3 (Packet Level)

services

:

packet types:

# of logical channels per

DTE (default)

Description

1.2, 2.4, 4.8, 9.6, 14.4, 19.2,

56kbps RS232-C, RS-449, V.35

LAPB

7 default, 1-6 optional

8248 bits

20 default, 1-200 optional

less than or equal to 3 seconds

less than or equal to .5 sec for

speeds less than or equal to

19.2 kbps less than or equal to

.25 sec for speeds greater than

19.2 kbps

modulo 8

virtual call and permanent

virtual circuit

all basic packets plus diagnostic,

interrupt and interrupt confirm

packets

10 (additional logical channels

available at additional cost)

18
LCN range: 0 - 4095

user data field: octet aligned

packet sequencing: modulo 8

address format 14 digits

VC user facilities*

Recommendation X.25 and FIPS 100

Support Provided

Closed User Group (CUG):

CUG with Incoming Access:

CUG with Outgoing Access:

Bilateral CUG:

Bilateral CUG with Outgoing

yes

yes

yes

no

Accessno Throughput Class Negotiation:

Flow Control Negotiation

yes

packet size:

octets

16,32,64,128,256,512,1024

window size: 2-7

One Way Logical Channel

Outgoing:

One Way Logical Channel

yes

Incoming:

Incoming Calls Barred:

Outgoing Calls Barred:

Fast Select:

Fast Select Acceptance:

Reverse Charging:

Reverse Charging Acceptance:

RPOA Selection:

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

* Facilities that apply to both virtual call and permanent virtual circuits

are available to both if supported.

19
4. SITE CONFIGURATION, LOCATION , PROTOCOLS, AND POINT OF CONTACT

INFORMATION FOR PSINET PARTICIPANTS

This section provides the information suggested by the title. Each

participating company is expected to complete its subsection.

4.1 U. S. Army Communications

Point of Contact: Mr. Thomas Pisani

U. S. Army Communications-Electronics Command

Systems Engineering & Integration Directorate

ATTN: AMSEL-SEI-TI

Fort Monmouth, N.J. 07703

(201) 544-2508

Organization ID: 26

4.2 U . S . Department of Agriculture

Point of Contact: Mrs. Elaine Stout

Office of Information Resources Management

Room 447W

14th & Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20250

(202) 475-4795

Organization ID: 23

4.3

AT&T Communications

System Name:

Location:

Conf iouration

:

AT&T Intermediate System

Bellevue, Washington (BOEING Computer Services

)

AT&T Network Controller providing ISC/OSI internetworking

of X. 25/802 . 3/802 .4 over the connectionless network

(DIS 3473) protocol.

Point of Contact: Matthew Gierlacn

AT&T

Ream 3-A254

60 Columoia Turnpike

Morristown, NJ 07960

201-829-7212

Organization ID: 11

4.4

Bceina Commuter Services

Bellevue, Washington

AT&T X.25 router to 802.3 and 802.4 modes

Location

:

Conf iguration

:
Protocols: FTAM (AUTOFACT), BCS Session

(Full Duplex), Transport

(Class 4), Internet Protocol Router

Subnetwork Point

of Attachment: 3134 206 708 1001

Point of Contact: Les Kerr

P.0. Box 24346

Seattle, WA 98124-0346

(206) 763-5868

Organization ID: 12

4.5

Charles River Data Systems

Point of Contact: Eric Spiewak

983 Concord St.

Framingham, MA 01701

(617) 626-1000

Organization ID: 13

4.6

Defense Communications Agency

Point of Contact: Martin Thompson

DCEC

1860 Wiehle Avenue

Reston, VA 22090

Organization ID: 22

4.7 Defense Logistics Agency

Point of Contact: Walter Simonson

Cameron Station

Alexandria, VA 22314

Organization ID: 7

4.8 Digital Equipment Corporation

Subnet

British Telecom's PSS service giving

access to AT&T's Accunet via X.75

Access lines: 1 @ 9.6kb

Configuration: micro-VAX II

Protocols: FTAM, Full Session, CLNP/X. 25-80 , X. 25-80,

VARCRLF, and UNDEF presentation contexts.

21
Point of Contact: Richard Benwell

RE02-G/M9

Digital Park

Imperial WayReading

+44-734-868711

Organization ID: 14

4.9 General Motors

Point of Contact: Gary Workman

APMES A/MD-39

30300 Mound Rd.

Warren, MI 48090

(313) 575-0632

Organzation ID: 15

4.10 Hewlett Packard

Configuration

:

HP 1000

Protocols

:

FTAM, CASE, Session (BCS full duplex). Transport

Class 4 and end-node connectionless IP

Point of Contact: Mary E . Ryan

Rnd R3NF

8000 Foothills Blvd.

Roseville, CA 95678

(916) 786-8000 x4519

Organization ID:

4.11 Honeywell Bull

16

Location: Phoenix, AZ

Equipment

:

Honeywell DPS-6

X.25 Network: AT&T AccuNet (sm)

Link Access: 1 x 9600 bps

Protocol (initially): X.25 (1980), Connectionless Internet

(end-system). Transport Class 4, Session BCS

(full duplex, FTAM

(Planned by 1987): Session BAS, X.400 MHS (PI, P2

)

Organization Name:

System Identifier:

HON01

HON01DS6

22
Application Entities:

Application Entity Title:

PSAP Selector:

SSAP Selector:

TSAP Selector:

NSAP Address:

FTAM

null (N/A)

46 54 41 4D 16

00 0116

47 0004 0011 0001 000000000001 00 16

Subnetwork Points of Attachment:

AccuNet Address: 602 210 1000

Point of Contact: Bruce Carlson

P.0. Box 8000, H32

Phoenix, AZ 85066

(602) 861-4944

System Name:

Organization:

NSAP:

T-Selector

S-Selector

HIS2

Honeywell Bull

47 0004 0011 0002 00 00 00 000001 00

0001

48 49 53 46 54 41 4D

PSS Address:

Location

Contact

Phone

02 3421 89 1010104

Honeywell House

Godfrey Way

Hanworth Road

Hounslow, Middlesex, England TW4-5PW

Martin Hassenberg

44 24 2291

Organization ID:

4.12 IBM

Conf igurat ion

Location:

17

IBM Series 1 processor, IBM 4300

Palo Alto, CA

Gaithersburg, MD (NBS)

La Gaude, France

X . 25 Access: ACCUNET

TRANSPAC ( La Gaude

)

Access Lines: 1 @ 4.8 kbps

1 @ 9.6 kbps (La Gaude)

Protocols Supported: X.25, 802.4, CLNS, Transport Class 4, Session

kernel, ACSE, FTAM

Organization Name: IBMPA

System Identifier: IBMPAMCS

Application Entities:

23
Application Entity Title:

PSAP Selector:

SSAP Selector:

TSAP Selector:

NSAP Selector:

IBMPAFTAM

null

49 42 4D 31 2E 46 54 41 4D

16

0001

16

47 0004 0001 0001 415257106200 00

16

Subnetwork Points of Attachment:

ACCUNET Address: 415 257 1062

IBMLG

I3MLGMCS

Organization Name:

System Identifier:

Application Entities:

Application Entity Title:

PSAP Selector:

SSAP Selector:

TSAP Selector:

IBMLGFTAM

null

49 42 4D 32 2E 46 54 41 4D

0001

16

NSAP Selector:

Subnetwork Points of Attachment:

ACCUNET Address:

16

47 0004 0001 0002 208006041768 00

16

2080 06041798

Point of Contact: Edward C. Strum

1501 California Ave., N.W.

Palo Alto, CA 94303-0828

(415) 855-4697

Henri Chorosz

Oil 33 93 585 772

Organization ID: 1

4.13 International Computers, Ltd.

Subnet

:

British Telecom's Kilostream Service giving access

to AT&T Accunet via X.75

Access Lines: 1 @ 64Kbps

Configuration: Torch Triple X as Sun 3/160 or as DRS 300 (according

to what is connected that day)

Protocols: Internet

Transport classes 0,2, 3,

4

Session BC3 kernal, BAS, BAS', BSS

FTAM ( NBS Phase 1)

NSAP: 4700040102000123427820010300

24
SNPA: 234278200103 (PSS)

Point of Contact: Roy Cadwallaaer

Manager, Network Technology

Technical Directorate

Westfields West Avenue

Kidsgrove Stoke-on-Trent ST7 1TL

United Kingdom

011-44-0782 771000 ext. 3806

Organization ID: 2

4.14 The MITRE Corporation

File Type: Addressing

Organization Name: MITBEDMA

System Identifier: MITBEDMASUN

Application Entity Title: FTAM

PSAP Selector: NULL

SSAP Selector: 4654414D

TSAP Selector: 0001

NSAP Address (or Network Entity Title

For an Intermediate System) : 470004001800010800200166FB00

SNPA Access Address (X.121 Address): 6174301015

Point of Contact: Stan Ames

Burlington Road

Bedford, MA 01730

(617) 271-3182

Organization ID: 24

4.15 National Bureau of Standards

X.25 attachment:

Location:

Network Configuration:

ACCUNET and WANGPAC

Gaithersburg, MD

a) VAX/780 intermediate and end system

b) IBM Series I's as end systems

c) IEEE 802.3 and 802.4 LAN attachments

d) correctness lab, performance lab, LAN

lab, and multi-processing lab attachments

via the LANs

ProtocolsAs specified in NBSIR-86-3385

.

Organization Name: NBSWASHDC

System Identifier: NBSWASHDCNIC

Application Entities:

25
Application Entity Title: NBS1FTAM

PSAP Selector: null

SSAP Selector: 46 54 41 4D

16

TSAP Selector: 0001

16

NSAP Selector: 47 0004 0003 0002 7F0000000000 00

16

Subnetwork Points of Attachment:

ACCUNET Address: 202 301 1007

Point of Contact: Jerry Mulvenna

Systems & Network Architecture Division

Building 225, Room B217

Gaithersburg, MD 20899

301/975-3631

Organization ID:

4 . 16 Department of Navy

3

Point of Contact: Dave Norem

NAVDAC , Code 32

Washington Navy Yard

Bldg. 218-2

Washington, DC 20374-1662

Organization ID:

4.17 NCR

20

Conf igurat ion

:

NCR Tower XP running UNIX System V

(operating as an end system)

Location

:

Minneapoiis/St . Paul, MN

X.25 Access: ACCUNET

Access Lines: 1 (a 9.6 kbps

Protocols Supported: FTAM, Session ( BCS full duplex). Transport

Class 4, Internet Protocol, X.25

Organization Name: NCR

SSAP Selector:

TSAP Selector:

NSAP Address:

ACCUNET SNPA:

NCR. FTAM <==> (4e 43 52 2e 46 54 41 4d)

00 01

4700040004000108001400329700

(3134) 6124501001

Point of Contact: Rick Johnson

NCR Comten, Inc.

26
2700 Snelling Ave . , N.

St. Paul, MN 55113

(612) 638-7767

Organization ID:

4.18 Retix

4

Location: Santa Monica, CA

Conf igurat ion

VAX 11/750 running

Berkeley 4.2 UNIX

Protocols

As specified in SNA 85-1

Point of Contact: John B. Stephensen

Vice President, Engineering

1547 Ninth Street

Santa Monica, CA 90401

Organization ID:

4.19 Sun Microsystems

6

Point of Contact: Michael Cox

2500 Garcia Avenue

Mountain View, CA 94043

(415) 960-1300

Organization Code:

4.20 TASC

21

Point of Contact: Jonathan S. Katz

One Jacob Way

Reading, MA 01867

(617) 944-6850, Ext. 2282

Organization ID: 19

4.21 Touch Communications

Point of Contact: Grant T. Hoshisaki

10 Victor Square, STE #150

Scotts Valley, CA 95066

(408) 438-4800

Organization ID: 25

27
4.22 Unisys

Point of Contact: Anita Skelton

3151 Camino Ruiz

Camarillo, CA 93010

(805) 987-9300

Organization ID: 18

4.23 Wang

Organization: WANG Laboratories, Inc.

Location: Lowell, Massachusettes

Contact: Joe Hielscner

Address: One Industrial Avenue

Mailstop 014-A1B

Lowell, MA 01851

Phone: 617-967-1030

Organization ID:

Organization Name:

System Identifyer:

09 10 “ 09 16

WLILWL

WLILWLVS1

FTAM A£ Title:

PSAP Selector:

SSAP Selector:

TSAP Selector:

NSAP Address:

FTAM

null (n/A)

46 54 41 4D 16

00 oi 16

47 0004 0009 0001 000036070000 00 16 (0SI1)

Network Connection:

SNPA Address:

ACCUNET Gateway

3134 617 430 7800 (OSI1)

Network Connection:

SNPA Address:

WANGPAC

000000 36 07 0000 (0SI1) <-- Main System

Availability: 9-4 Eastern Standard Time

Supported Protocols: FTAM-1 , VARCRLF/ UNDEF , Full Session, TP-4

CLNP/X. 25-80, X. 25-80

Conf iguration

:

VS 85 connected to WangPac Network Operation

Center. WangPac gateways to AccuNet via an X.25

switch located in Lowell, MA.

Organization ID: 9

28
4.24 The Wollongong Group

Point of Contact: Narayan Mohanram

1129 San Antonio Rd.

Palo Alto, CA 94303

Location

Palo Alto, CA

Conf igurat ion

3B15 processor

Protocols

FTAM, BCS Session,

Transport (Class 4), CLNS

Organization ID: 8

29
5. PROGRAM OF WORK

5 . 1 INITIAL PROJECTS

5.1.1 Initial Connectivity

The first project is to provide connectivity among all of the OSINET

companies

.

This is viewed as a two-step process. The first step is for each company to

connect, directly or via a gateway, to ACCUNET or WANGPAC and verify

operation, i.e., connection establishment, data transfer, and connection

termination.

The second step is to exercise the protocol suite described in section 2.1 of

this document. This is to be done by executing a subset of the FTAM tests

used for AUTOFACT '85 testing. The subset is to be determined by the

Technical Committee. Each company will run the FTAM tests with five other

companies

.

"Initial Connection" interoperability testing will be determined- by completing

testing with five (5) partners plus exchanging addressing and news information

with the NIC.

(a) Other testing can be conducted and recorded, but does not pertain to

the "initial connection" interoperability completion criteria.

(b) It may be advantageous for OSINET participants to choose their

partners

.

(c) If participants decide to choose partners, they should inform NBS

before testing begins.

(a) Participants should attempt to test with different hardware/software

systems, if they informally arrange test partners.

(e) All testing progress should continue to be reported to NBS.

(f) NBS will continue to assign test partners, as requested.

To ensure continued interoperability, participants are encouraged to perform

regression testing when changes are made to their OSINET system.

5.1.2 NIC Services

OSINET will provide Network Information Center services.

30
5.1.3 DoD Transition to the Use of OSI

The joint NBS, DCA, Navy, and Industry work on FTAM, MHS, VTP, and directory

services as a step in the DoD transition to the use of OSI has been approved

as an OSINET project.

5.1.4 X.400 Message Handling Systems

OSINET can optionally be used by interested participants for the interoperability testing of electronic messaging protocols using the CCITT X.400

Series of recommendations. It has been provisionally approved, subject to

review of a detailed proposal, that testing will be based on the speciications of the NBS OSI Workshop SIG on X.400 specification, rev 1.0, as contained in NBSIR 86-3385.

5. 1.4.1 Nature of OSINET Messaging Project

Participants in the OSINET Messaging project must provide network connectivity

to the existing OSINET topology. Participation in the messaging project shall

be an optional function for OSINET members.

An OSINET messaging participant may provide either a full end system (PI and

P2) or a message transfer service (PI only) system. Both the PRMD-PRMD and

PRMD-ADMD profiles will be utilized.

Initially, messaging participants will provide full messaging end-systems (Pi

and P2) and will provide one or more PRMDs; the PRMD-PRMD profile will be

utilized. The PRMD-ADMD profile will be added when an OSINET member (or

applicant) administration applies and an appropriate bridge (relay) to other

OSINET messaging systems is provided. Participation as an intermediate PRMD

or ADMD (PI only) will be defined when requested by an OSINET member.

5. 1.4.2 Role of the Technical Committee

The Technical Committee collects and publishes (in the OSINET agreements

standing document) the X.400 messaging addressing information it feels is

necessary to permit inter-member message exchange. This includes the subnetwork point of attachment (i.e., Accunet address), NSAP, T-selector, Sselector, PRMD name, MTA name, MTA password (if used) and the 0/R names of

persons who may be sent mail. Where necessary, the Technical Committee shall

insure that such elements as PRMD and MTA names are unique among members.

The Technical Committee will make the above information available to members

via the NIC. The TC will investigate maintaining NIC files listing the 0/R names of persons who may receive mail via OSINET at each member location.

The Technical Committee will define and publish (as an appendix to the OSINET

agreements standing document) a basic set of confidence tests designed to

verify that mail can be successfully exchanged among OSINET messaging

participants

.

31
The Technical Committee will assign testing partners, such that each

participant may execute the set of tests with at least five (5) other members.

The Technical Committee shall report on testing status to the Steering

Committee

.

The Technical Committee shall provide as liaison with the Workshop's X.400 SIG

any questions, problems, or ambiguities detected in the messaging functional

standard.

5. 1.4.

3

PRMD-PRMD Messaging Agreements

Initially, only PRMD to PRMD messging will be defined. Others will be defined

when a member desires to operate in that mode. This subsection deals

exclusively with this option.

32
5. 1.4.4 Participating Systems

Each participant provides one or more MTAs . Each MTA connected to OSINET

shall represent a PRMD. (If a member wishes, it may relay to other MTAs in

its own PRMD . )

Each PRMD shall support at least one UA.

5. 1.4.5 Protocols Used

o Layers 1-4 are identical to those used for current OSINET FTAM-1

operation. (Addresses may be different.)

o Session protocol is the Basic Application Subset (BAS).

o Presentation is X.409.

o Application Protocols are PI (Message Transfer) and P2 (Inter-Personal

Messaging.

)

33
5. 1.4.6 Addressing Information Required

Two Types of X.400 addressing information are required:

o Addressing information for communicating with, and routing to, an MTA/PRMD

.

o Addressing information for designating a messge recipient (0/R name).

MTA Addressing

MTA Name

Password

ADMD Name

PRMD Name

Country

S-selector: (Is NULL required?)

T-selector

NSAP

DTE Address

0/R Name Addressing

For each Mail User:

Country*

ADMD Name* (a single space)

PRMD Name*

Organization

Personal Name

Surname*

Given Name

Initials

Generation Qualifier

Organizational Units (up to 4)

*Mandatory in Workshop Functional Standard

Are Domain-Defined Attributes important?

5. 1.4.7 NIC Proposal

Purpose: To make X.400 Addressing information available for exchange among

OSINET members.

1. Add MTA Name, MTA password. Country, ADMD name, and PRMD name

to the addressing file (for each system).

2. Add a Message file to define Persons (0/R names) reachable at

each member organization.

See attached proposal for NIC modification in support of X.400 messaging.

34
5. 1.4.8 Specific Agreements

Shall we all agree not to use password on RTS Connect? Shall we all agree to

use Password verification on Connect? Do we care (shall each participant

specify whether it is required or not)?

Shall we use RTS checkpointing, or not, or not care (i.e. , negotiate either

way ) ?

Shall we agree to a maximum size for message that must be accepted e.g.,

10,000 characters?) (The Workshop SIG agreements call for 1 million character

MPDUs . )

5. 1.4.9 Initial Inter-operability Tests

Initial interoperability testing is intended to demonstrate confidence that

reasonable mail items can be exchanged between two systems. (Invalid mail

items are not deliberately generated.)

Initial testing is intended to be conducted between pairs of systems, A and B.

The tests will require system A to send a set of mail items to system B.

System B should then reciprocate by sending the same set of mail items to

system A.

SPAG has produced a Guide to the Testing of Interoperability of X.400 Message

Handling Systems , which includes (chapter 7) vendor to vendor tests. These

tests (six in each direction) vary the following parameters:

A. Copy Recipient

B. Reply IP Message ID

C. Non-Delivery (sending to unknown 0/R name).

D. Conversion Prohibited (all text is IAS)

E. Delivery Notification Requested

F. Grade of Delivery (Normal, Urgent, non-Urgent)

Specific OSINET testing procedures for Messging will be included as an appendix to a future version of this document.

Document Formats

Support of IA5 body part types is required.

5.1.5 Directory Services

Directory Services, based on the joint ISO/CCITT standard and implementation

agreements developed at the NBSOSI Workshop, has been approved as an optional

OSINET project.

35
6. POINTS OF CONTACT

6.1 POINTS OF CONTACT FOR COMMITTEES

Jerry Mulvenna, Chair, OSINET Steering Committee, (301) 975-3622

Edward Strum, Chair, OSINET Technical Committee, (415) 855-4697

Jim Converse, liaison for MAP/TOP Steering Committee, (716) 726-1957

6.2 POINTS OF CONTACT FOR X.25 SERVICES

ACCUNET Steven Lind

AT&T

Room 17-5361C1

295 North Maple Avenue

Basking Ridge, NJ 07920

(201) 221-2834

WANGPAC Joe Hielscher

Wang Laboratories', Inc.

One Industrial Avenue

Lowell, MA 01851

(617) 459-5000/967-1030

36
REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY

NBS

NBSIR 86-3385: Implementation Agreements for Open Systems Interconnection

Protocols, National Bureau of Standards, Bldg. 225, Rm. B217, Gaithersburg, MD

20899.

FIPS 107, Local Area Networks: Baseband Carrier Sense Multiple Accesswith

Collision Detection Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications and Link

Layer Protocol, National Technical Information Service (NTIS), U.S. Department

of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

FIPS 100, Interface Between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data

Circuit-Terminating Equipment (DCE) For Operation With Packet-Switched Data

Communications Networks, NTIS, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal

Road, Springfield, VA 22161.

IEEE

IEEE Project 302, Local Area Network Standards, P802.2 Logical Link Control,

November 1982

.

IEEE Project 802, Local Area Network Standards, IEEE Standard 802.4 Token - Passing Bus Access Method and Physical Layer Specification.

IEEE Project 802, Local Area Network Standards, IEEE Standard 802.3 CSMA/CD

Access Method and Physical Layer Specification.

The above documents may be obtained from IEEE Standards Office, 345 East 47th

Street, New York, N.Y. 10017.

ISO

Addendum to DIS 8473 Covering Provision of the Connectionless-Mode Network

Service, IS0/TC97/SC 6/N3453

.

Network Service Definition, DIS 8348, ISO/TC97/SC6 N2990.

Addendum to the Network Service Definition Covering Connectionless Data

Transmission, DIS 8348 DADl, N3152.

Addendum to the Network Service Definition Covering Network Layer Addressing,

DP 8348 DAD2 , N3134.

Internal Organization of the Network Layer, dp 8648.

Protocol for Providing the Connectionless Network Service, DIS 8473 N3154.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Transport

37
Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Transport

Service Definition, ISO IS8072, 1984.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Transport

Protocol Specification, ISO 138073, 1984.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Session

Service Definition, ISO DIS8326, 1984.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Session

Protocol Specification, ISO DIS8327, 1984.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer

Access and Management Part 1: General Description, ISO DP8571/1, TC97/SC16

N1669, February 1984.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer

Access and Management Part II: The Virtual Filestore, ISO DP8571/2, TC97/SC16

N1670, February 1984.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer

Access and Management Part III: Service Definition, ISDP8571/3, TC97/SC16

N1671, February 1984.

Information Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer

Access and Management Part IV: Protocol Specification, ISODP8571/4, TC97/SC16

N1672, February 1984.

Data Communication - X.25 Packet Layer Specification for Data Terminal

Equipment, ISO/TC 97/SC6 N2641, ISO/DP 8208, 1983.

7-bit Coded Character Set for Information Processing Interchange, ISO-646,

1973.

Information Interchange—Representation of Local Time Differentials ISO-3307,

1975.

The above documents may be obtained from: Frances E. Schrotter, ANSI, ISO

TC97/SC6 Secretariat, 1430 3rcadway, New York, New York 10018

CCITT

X.25, Interface Between Data Terminal Equipment (DTE) and Data CircuitTerminating Equipment (DCE) for Terminals Operating in the Packet Mode on Public Data Networks.

X.400, Message Handling Systems: System Model- Service Elements.

X.401, Message Handling Systems: Basic Service Elements and Optional User

Facilities

38
X. 408 , Message Handling Systems: Encoded Information Type Conversion Rules.

X.409, Message Handling Systems: Presentation Transfer Syntax and Notation.

X.410, Message Handling Systems: Remote Operations and Reliable Transfer

Server.

X.411, Message Handling Systems: Message Transfer Layer.

X.420, Message Handling Systems: Interpersonal Messaging User Agent Layer.

X.430, Message Handling Systems: Access Protocol for Teletex Terminals.

The above documents may be obtained from International Telecommunications

Union, Place aes Nations, CH 1211, Geneve 20 Switzerland.

ATT COMMUNICATIONS

DOC #54010 - X.25 Interface Specification and Packet Switching Capabilities,

January 1984.

DOC #54012 - X.75 Interface Specification and Packet Switching Capabilities,

August 1984.

See Section 3.1 for information on how to obtain these documents.

WANG

C/30 PSN X.25 Interface Specification, Release 3, Report No. 5500, November,

1983.

Packet Switch Node (PSN) 5.0 Release Note.

The above documents may be obtained from Joe Hielscher, Wang, One Industrial

Avenue, Lowell, MA 01851

39
APPENDIX A: NETWORK ADDRESSING INFORMATION

The NSAP address form chosen by OSINET participants follows

AFI OSINET ID

IDI 47 00 04

1 octet 2 octets

ORGID SUBNET ID SNPA

DSP

NSAP SEL

2 octets 2 octets 4-8 octets 1 octet

Routing on the X.25 backbone is based on the ORGID and possibly the subnet ID.

The SNPA is only meaningful to the destination subnetwork.

ISO has assigned OSINET an OSINET ID = 4 . NBS is the administrative authority

for Organization ID's. ORganization ID assignments are specified in decimal

form with company site configuration information in section 4.

40
APPENDIX B: FTAM INTEROPERABILITY TESTS

The OSINET group has agreed that OSINET participants will run a standard set

of tests which are a subset of the AUTOFACT FTAM tests to verify

interoperability when they first join the network. Each OSINET participant

will have a file named DIR. LIS which contains a list of other files which can

be retreived. The presentation context will be VARCRLF. The tests to be run that follow are described in a language developed for the DEC FTAM

implementations. OSINET interoperability testing will be between two FTAM

implementations - the FTAM tester will not be used. Accordingly, the

following information should be used as a guide to the FTAM functions that

must be tested.

********r***********************************************************

! FTAM reference Test Scenario V003 FRI013.C0M

;

1 FTAM Reference software runs as FTAM Initiator.

! Establish FTAM connection regime.

J

! Create, open, write data, close and deselect a file on the remote

system.

t

! The terminate the connection and disconnect the virtual circuit.

! (Assumes that the logical name FREFEMOTE translates to the

! target remote system.

)

JCONNECT/OUTBOUND/REMOTE=FREFEMOTE

FRI013.C0M Create and write file

set log fref $log: fri013 . log

show time

SEND F_INITIATE_REQ

RECEIVE F INITIATE P

! f_initiate request

! Wait for positive f_initiate response

SEND F_CREATE_REQ

! Create remote file

/remote_f ile=fri013 . v

- /local_f ile=fref $ infile : friO 13 .r - /stream

RECEIVE F CREATE P ! Wait for positive f_select response

41
SEND F_OPEN_REQ

RECEIVE F OPEN P

! f_open request

! Wait for open response

SEND F_WRITE_REQ ! f_write request

i SEND F_TRANSER_END_REQ 1 Send f_transfer_end

RECEIVE F_TRANSFER_SND_P ! Wait for f_transfer_end response

SEND F_TRANSFER_END_REQ

RECEIVE F_TRANSER_END_P

i SEND F_DESELECT_REQ

RECEIVE F_DESELECT_P

i DISCONNECT/OUTBOUND

! f_close request

! WAIT for f_transfer_end response

! Deselect remote file

! Wait for deselect response

! *********************************************************************

exit

FRI007.C0M ! Read attributes and read file

set log fref $log: fri007 . log

show time *******************************************************************

FTAM REFERENCE TEST SCENARIO V003 FRI007.CCM

FTAM Reference software runs as FTAM Initiator.

Establish FTAM connection regime.

Select, open, read remote data, close and deselect a file on the remote system

Then terminate the connection and disconnect the virtual circuit.

(Assumes that rhe logical name FREFEMCTE translates to the

target remote system.

)

CONNECT/OUTBOUND/ REMOTE=FREFEMOTE

t SEND F_INITIATE_REQ ! f_initiate request

RECEIVE

t F_INITIATE_P ! Wait for positive f_initiate response

Send F_SELECT_REQ - ! Select remote file

/remote_f ile=fri007.v - /local_file=

/stream

fref $outfile : fri007 .r -

RECEIVE

t F_SELECT_P ! Wait for positive f_select response

SEND F_READ ATTRIB REQ ! f_open request

RECEIVE

! F_READ_ATTRIB_P ! Wait for read attribute response

SEND F_0PEN_REQ ! f open request

42
RECEIVE F_OPEN_P

jSEND F_READ_REQ

RECEIVE F_DATA_REQ/LOOP

! Wait for open response

! f_read request

! Receive f_data as long as available

RECEIVE F_DATA_END_REQ

iSEND F_TRANSFER_END_REQ

RECEIVE F_TRANSFER_END_P

i SEND F_DESELECT_REQ

RECEIVE F_TERMINATE_P

! DISCONNECT/OUTBOUND

! Receive f_data_end

! Send f_transfer_end

! Wait for f_transfer_end response

! Deselect remote file

! Wait for f_terminate response

i a***************************************************************'***

exit

FRIOQ5.COM ! Delete file

set log f ref $log : f ir005 . log

show time

[

! FTAM Reference Test Scenario V003 FRI005.C0M

J

! FTAM Reference software runs as FTAM Initiator.

1 Establish FTAM connection regime.

J

! Select, delete and deselect a file on the remote system.

J

! Then terminate the connection and disconnect the virtual

! circuit.

! (Assumes that the logical name FREFEMOTE translates to

! the target remote system.

)

J

! This test will delete the file fri005.v on the remote system.

CONNECT/OUTBOUND/ REM0TE=FREFEMOTE

1SEND F_INITIATE_REQ ! f_initiate request

RECEIVE

i F_INITIATE_P ! Wait for positive f_initiate response

SEND F_SELECT_REQ - ! Select remote file

/remote_f ile=fri005 . v - /local_f ile=fref $outfile : fri005 . r

- / stream

RECEIVE

i F_SELECT_P ! Wait for positive f_select response

SEND F_DELETE_REQ ! f_delete request

43
RECEIVE F_DELETE_P ! Wait for delete response

I D I S CONNECT/OUTBOUND

I

!

! *******************************************************************

exit

44
READER RESPONSE FORM

You will receive the documents from the next OSINET Technical Committee

meeting either by attending the next meeting or completing and returning the

form below

.

Please retain my name for OSINET Technical Committee mailings. (7/87)

NAME : —

ADDRESS : — — — — —

PHONE : — —

Mail the above form to: Carol Lemnah

National Bureau of Standards

Building 225, Room B217

Gaithersburg, MD 20899

July 1987

45
N8S-114A (rev. 2-80

U.S. DEPT. OF COMM. 1. PUBLICATION OR 2. Performing Organ. Report NoJ 3. Publication Date BIBLIOGRAPHIC OATA

SHEET (See instructions)

REPORT NO.

NBSIR-86-3478-4 July 1987

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

Implementation Agreements Among Participants

of OSINET.

5. AUTHOR(S)

Gerard Mulvenna

6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION (If joint or other than NBS. see instructions

)

7. Contract/Grant No. NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

GAITHERSBURG, MD 20899

8. Type of Report & Period Covered

9. SPONSORING ORGANIZATION NAME AND COMPLETE ADDRESS (Street. City. State. ZIP)

10. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

|

I Document describes a computer program; SF-185, FIPS Software Summary, is attached.

11. ABSTRACT (A 200-word or less factual summary of most significant information. If document includes a significant

bibliography or literature survey, mention it here)

This is a standing document reflecting agreements reached by the member

companies and agencies of OSINET. The OSINET is a research network

established for the purposes of developing prototype tests and test systems

for Open Systems Interconnection network protocols, and other OSI-related

research

12. KEY WORDS (Six to twelve entries; alphabetical oraer; capitalize o my proper names; and separate Key words bv semicolon s) implementation agreements; Open Systems Interconnection; OSINET; protocol

testing; test tools; workshop

13. availability

Unl imited For Official Distribution. Do Not Release to NTIS

Order From Suoermtendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

20 ^02.

Order prom National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, VA. 22161

14. NO. OF

PRINTED PAGES

15. Price

USCOMM-OC 6043-PSC