alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §3325. General provisions

#### (a) Application of existing procedures

Except as provided in subsection (b), the requirements relating to student eligibility, needs analysis, and determination of eligibility for the program to be attended regularly incorporated by reference into contracts under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act [25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.] for tribal operation of higher education grant programs prior to January 1, 1991, shall apply.

#### (b) Additional, excess, and incremental costs

The tribe or tribal organization may establish in writing, subject to the review of the Secretary, procedures for determining additional, excess, or inducement costs to be associated with grants for critical area service agreements.

(Pub. L. 102–325, title XIII, §1325, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 805.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which is classified principally to chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

          - [STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (2004-4)] 

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board. 

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor. 

# SUMMARY:

The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2004 rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2004 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.097. The fourth quarter 2003 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.544. The fourth quarter 2004 RCAF-5 is 0.519. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

October 1, 2004. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541. [Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-8339.] 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Additional information is contained in the Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, call ASAP Document Solutions at (301) 577-2600. [Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.] 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or energy conservation. 

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Decided: September 13, 2004. 

By the Board, Chairman Nober, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner Buttrey. 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 04-21355 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
### §1542. Agency cooperation; private contracts for management services and technical assistance

For the purpose of providing the assistance required under section 1541 of this title, the Secretary is authorized to cooperate with the Small Business Administration and the Corporation for National and Community Service and other Federal agencies in the use of existing programs of this character in those agencies. In addition, the Secretary is authorized to enter into contracts with private organizations for providing such services and assistance.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title V, §502, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 93–113, title VI, §601(d), Oct. 1, 1973, 87 Stat. 416; Pub. L. 103–82, title IV, §405(f), Sept. 21, 1993, 107 Stat. 921.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1993—Pub. L. 103–82 substituted "the Corporation for National and Community Service" for "ACTION Agency".

1973—Pub. L. 93–113 substituted "ACTION Agency" for "ACTION".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1993 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–82 effective Apr. 4, 1994, see section 406(b) of Pub. L. 103–82, set out as a note under section 8332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §3631. Tribal authority

Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to—

(1) encroach upon or diminish in any way the inherent sovereign authority of each tribal government to determine the role of the tribal justice system within the tribal government or to enact and enforce tribal laws;

(2) diminish in any way the authority of tribal governments to appoint personnel;

(3) impair the rights of each tribal government to determine the nature of its own legal system or the appointment of authority within the tribal government;

(4) alter in any way any tribal traditional dispute resolution forum;

(5) imply that any tribal justice system is an instrumentality of the United States; or

(6) diminish the trust responsibility of the United States to Indian tribal governments and tribal justice systems of such governments.

(Pub. L. 103–176, title III, §301, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2009.)
<PAGE>

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, John Roblin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Registrant"), certify that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 of the
Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ John Roblin
----------------------------------
Name: John Roblin
Date: May 13, 2003











                                       18
###### Editorial Note on Part 1600

#### Editorial Note:

At 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017, as required by the Congressional Review Act and Public Law 115-12, the Bureau of Land Management removed all amendments to part 1600 made effective on Jan. 11, 2017, at 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016.

#### § 1610.4-5 Formulation of alternatives.

At the direction of the Field Manager, in collaboration with any cooperating agencies, BLM will consider all reasonable resource management alternatives and develop several complete alternatives for detailed study. Nonetheless, the decision to designate alternatives for further development and analysis remains the exclusive responsibility of the BLM. The alternatives developed shall reflect the variety of issues and guidance applicable to the resource uses. In order to limit the total number of alternatives analyzed in detail to a manageable number for presentation and analysis, all reasonable variations shall be treated as sub-alternatives. One alternative shall be for no action, which means continuation of present level or systems of resource use. The plan shall note any alternatives identified and eliminated from detailed study and shall briefly discuss the reasons for their elimination.

[48 FR 20368, May 5, 1983, as amended at 70 FR 14567, Mar. 23, 2005; 81 FR 89661, Dec. 12, 2016; 82 FR 60555, Dec. 21, 2017]
§ 11.44 What does the authorized official do after the close of the comment period? ( a ) The authorized official must carefully review all comments received on the Assessment Plan, provide substantive responses to all comments, and modify the Plan as appropriate. [See § 11.32(e)(2) to determine if the authorized official must provide for additional public review.]
( b ) If, after reviewing the public comments, the authorized official decides to continue with the type A procedure, he or she must then perform a final application of the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE, using final data inputs and modifications based on § 11.41 and any reliable information received during the public review and comment period.
( c ) After completing the final application of the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE, the authorized official must prepare a Report of Assessment. The Report of Assessment must include the printed output from the final application as well as the Preassessment Screen Determination and the Assessment Plan.
( d ) If the authorized official is aware of reliable evidence that a private party has recovered damages for commercial harvests lost as a result of the release, the authorized official must eliminate from the claim any damages for such lost harvests that are included in the lost economic rent calculated by the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE.
( e ) If the authorized official is aware of reliable evidence that the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE application covers resources beyond his or her trustee jurisdiction, the authorized official must either: ( 1 ) Have the other authorized official(s) who do have trustee jurisdiction over those resources join in the type A assessment; or
( 2 ) Eliminate any damages for those resources from the claim for damages.
( f ) If the final application of the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE, adjusted as needed under paragraphs (d) and (e), calculates damages in excess of $100,000, then the authorized official must limit the portion of his or her claim calculated with the type A procedure to $100,000.
( g ) After preparing the Report of Assessment, the authorized official must follow the steps described in subpart F.
[61 FR 20612, May 7, 1996]
Press Release




[Graphic Omitted] Ahold

                                                        Royal Ahold
                                                        Corporate Communications

                                                 Date:  January 7, 2004
                                 For more information:  +31 75 659 57 20



Ahold served with summons by VEB

Zaandam, The Netherlands, January 7, 2004 - Ahold today announced that it has
been served by the VEB (Association of Dutch Stockholders) with a summons to
appear before the Enterprise Chamber ("Ondernemingskamer") of the Amsterdam
Court of Appeals in connection with a claim by the VEB that the annual accounts
for fiscal years 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002 be nullified and that Ahold be
ordered to restate its accounts and related annual reports for such periods.

The company deems this claim to be unfounded and intends to vigorously oppose
it.



Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.57.20




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certain statements in this press release are "forward-looking statements" within
the meaning of U.S. federal securities laws. Ahold intends that these
statements be covered by the safe harbors created under these laws. These
forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results
expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. There are important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
information set forth in these forward-looking statements. Many of these factors
are beyond Ahold's ability to control or predict. For additional information on
these forward-looking statements and the factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements, please see Ahold's public filings. Given these
uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the
forward-looking statements, which only speak as of the date of this press
release. Ahold does not undertake any obligation to release publicly any
revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances
after the date of this press release or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities
laws.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                                                  Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                  P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                  The Netherlands
                                                  Phone:   +31 (0)75 659 5720
                                                  Fax:     +31 (0)75 659 8302

http://www.ahold.com
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OFTHE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thethree month period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Ward Paxton, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                                          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 12, 2006 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|-------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|              | G. Ward Paxton          |
|              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and ore deposits of the Summitville district, San 
Juan Mountains, Colorado

#### Professional Paper 343

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (14181 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (2935 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (5604 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (8409 pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                 
    (899 pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                 
    (745 pdf)
- Preceding Publications:
- Geologic 
    map of the Summitville mining district of Colorado (1953)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp343 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:06:03
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HURIAS MACHUCA VALENCIA, AKA

Lazaro Machuca Valencia, AKA Manuel

Machuca Valencia,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 70104

Agency No. A098

- 959

- 174

MEMORANDUM *

HURIAS MACHUCA VALENCIA, AKA

Lazaro Machuca Valencia, AKA Manuel

Machuca Valencia, AKA Lazaro Machucha

Valencia, AKA Manuel Machucha Valencia,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 72718

Agency N o. A098

- 959

- 174

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

JUN 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Submitted June 5, 2020 * *

Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Hurias Machuca Valencia (“Machuca”) , a native and citizen of Mexico,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)

dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his

application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction u nder 8 U.S.C. § 1252

,

and we deny the petition.

1. Machuca made only passing reference to the BIA’s determination that

he could safely relocate within Mexico in his opening brief to this Court and

therefore waives his right to challenge it on appeal

. Aguilar

- Ramos v. Holder , 594

F.3d 701, 703 n.1 (9th Cir 2010) (“Issues raised in a brief that are not supported by

argument are deemed abandoned.” ( quoting Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256,

1259 (9th Cir. 1996)) ). The relocation finding is dispositive as to fear of future

persecution. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(3)(i) (“In cases in which the applicant has not

established past persecution, the applicant shall bear the burden of establishing that

it would not be reasonable for him or her to relocate

. . . . ”). We t herefore will not

consider Machuca’ s separate argument that the BIA erred in failing to find that he

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).3

has a well

- founded fear of future persecution.

2. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Machuca’ s motion to

reopen where Machuca did not include wit h the motion any application for the relief

sought or a supporting declaration

. 1 See Bonilla v. Lynch , 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th

Cir. 2016) (“We review the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of

discretion

. . . . ”) ; 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) ( “ A motion to reopen proceedings for the

purpose of submitting an application for relief must be accompanied by the

appropriate application for relief and all supporting documentation. ” )

.

PETITION DENIED.

1 Machuca’s motion for judicial notice (Dkt. No. 23) and motion to strike (Dkt. No.

34) are DENIED as moot.
§ 2569.506 How will the BLM convey the land? ( a ) The BLM will issue a Certificate of Allotment which includes language similar to the language found in Certificates of Allotment issued under the Act of May 17, 1906 (34 Stat. 197, chapter 2469), providing that the land conveyed will be deemed the homestead of the allottee and his or her heirs in perpetuity, and will be inalienable and nontaxable until otherwise provided by Congress or until the Secretary of the Interior or his or her delegate approves a deed of conveyance vesting in the purchaser a complete title to the land.
( b ) The Certificate of Allotment will be issued subject to valid existing rights.
( c ) The United States will reserve to itself all minerals in the Certificate of Allotment.
( d ) If the Eligible Individual is deceased, the Certificate of Allotment will be issued in the name of the heirs, devisees, and/or assigns of the deceased Eligible Individual.
----

|   | 1.     The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.     The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and   results of      operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      31, 2009 |   | By:    | /s/      John O’Keefe                                                             |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 |   |   | John      O’KeefeChief      Executive Officer andPrincipal      Executive Officer |   |
### §1933. Funds for on and off reservation programs

#### (a) Appropriated funds for similar programs of Department of Health and Human Services; appropriation in advance for payments

In the establishment, operation, and funding of Indian child and family service programs, both on and off reservation, the Secretary may enter into agreements with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and the latter Secretary is hereby authorized for such purposes to use funds appropriated for similar programs of the Department of Health and Human Services: Provided, That authority to make payments pursuant to such agreements shall be effective only to the extent and in such amounts as may be provided in advance by appropriation Acts.

#### (b) Appropriation authorization under section 13 of this title

Funds for the purposes of this chapter may be appropriated pursuant to the provisions of section 13 of this title.

(Pub. L. 95–608, title II, §203, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3076; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Secretary of Health and Human Services" and "Department of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" and "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare", respectively, in subsec. (a) pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88, which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.