alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §358. Repeal of statutory provisions relating to survey, classification, and allotments which provide for repayment out of Indian moneys

Any and all provisions contained in any Act passed prior to March 7, 1928, for the survey, resurvey, classification, and allotment of lands in severalty under the provisions of the Act of February 8, 1887 (24 Stat. 388), which provide for the repayment of funds appropriated proportionately out of any Indian moneys held in trust or otherwise by the United States and available by law for such reimbursable purposes, are repealed: Provided further, That the repeal shall not affect any funds authorized to be reimbursed by any special Act of Congress wherein a particular or special fund is mentioned from which reimbursement shall be made.

(Mar. 7, 1928, ch. 137, §1, 45 Stat. 206.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of February 7, 1887, referred to in text, is popularly known as the Indian General Allotment Act. For classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 331 of this title and Tables.
Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation 

21871 Aviation Ave 

Georgetown, DE 19947 

443-458-8926 Phone 

410-749-2588 Fax 

www.delawareaviationmuseum.org 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Attn: Rules Docket, AGC -10 

Office of Chief Counsel 

800 Independence Avenue 

Washington, DC 20591 

cc: U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

400 th Street SW, Room PL 401 

Washington, DC 20591-0001 

Dear Sirs: 

Re: Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation, petitioner for extension of 

Exemption 8702C, Docket Number FAA-2005-20788. 

The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation requests an extension of 

Exemption 8702C terminate November 30, 2015. 

In consideration of the public interest and safety in which the original petition 

was granted, the Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation submits the following 

information to support this request: 

• The conditions and terms that were detailed in the original petition 

remain unchanged. 

• The exemption has been in effect since March 2006 without incident, 

accident, or injury. 

• The Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation has established and 

adhered to all of the limitations, maintenance and training 

requirements detailed in Exemption 8702C. 
Delaware Aviation Museum Foundation 

21871 Aviation Ave 

Georgetown, DE 19947 

443-458-8926 Phone 

410-749-2588 Fax 

www.delawareaviationmuseum.org 

If I can be of further assistance to you in your review of this 

request, please do not hesitate to contact me at (410) 991-2356, or 

larrydkelley@aol.com. 

/;J, 17&!~ ~4 kcU~ Larry D. Kelley RPh 

Director
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Richard Belleville, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-223;

Fifth District

July 1, 1974.

*1089Robert E. Farrell and Michael J. Rosborough, both of the State Appellate Defender’s Office, of Mt. Vernon, for appellant.

Robert H. Rice, State’s Attorney, of Belleville (Donald J. Dahlmann, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel), for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinión of the court:

Defendant was convicted of burglary upon his plea of guilty in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County. He was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of not less than 2 years or more than 6 years.

On this appeal defendant claims that the trial court failed to comply with Supreme Court Rule 402 (Ill. Rev. Stat, ch. 110A, par. 402.); that the trial court improperly denied his request for probation; and that his sentence was excessive.

A review of the entire proceeding shows that defendant as to all of the points he has questioned under Supreme Court Rule 402 (Ill. Rev. Stat, ch. 110A, par. 402) was properly admonished. While it would be preferable if a method of separate questions and answers had been used, we find the procedure here used sufficient where no question arises as to defendant’s ability to understand.

 Defendant next claims that he should have been granted probation for the purpose of treatment as a drug addict. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 911⁄2, par. 120.10.) In this regard defendant cites *People v.*Robinson, 12 Ill.App.3d 291, 297 N.E.2d 621. We adhere to our holding in *Robinson*but find that the facts here require a different result. The only evidence in this record of defendant’s use of drugs is his own statement and he states that he has not used such drugs for 3 months. Under all the circumstances of this case we find that denying probation for the purpose of treatment was not error.

 While there is evidence in the record to sustain the trial court’s denial of probation, there is nothing in addition to justify a sentence in excess of the minimum provided by law. In other words, to justify more than a minimum sentence, it takes evidence in addition to what is necessary to justify a denial of probation. Since such additional evidence does not appear in this record, we reduce to a minimum of 1 year and a maximum of 3 years.

Judgment affirmed as modified.

G. MORAN, P. J., and CARTER, J., concur.
§ 24.1 Introduction. ( a ) In 1970, the Secretary of the Interior developed a policy statement on intergovernmental cooperation in the preservation, use and management of fish and wildlife resources. The purpose of the policy (36 FR 21034, Nov. 3, 1971) was to strengthen and support the missions of the several States and the Department of the Interior respecting fish and wildlife. Since development of the policy, a number of Congressional enactments and court decisions have addressed State and Federal responsibilities for fish and wildlife with the general effect of expanding Federal jurisdiction over certain species and uses of fish and wildlife traditionally managed by the States. In some cases, this expansion of jurisdiction has established overlapping authorities, clouded agency jurisdictions and, due to differing agency interpretations and accountabilities, has contributed to confusion and delays in the implementation of management programs. Nevertheless, Federal authority exists for specified purposes while State authority regarding fish and resident wildlife remains the comprehensive backdrop applicable in the absence of specific, overriding Federal law.
( b ) The Secretary of the Interior reaffirms that fish and wildlife must be maintained for their ecological, cultural, educational, historical, aesthetic, scientific, recreational, economic, and social values to the people of the United States, and that these resources are held in public trust by the Federal and State governments for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans. Because fish and wildlife are fundamentally dependent upon habitats on private and public lands managed or subject to administration by many Federal and State agencies, and because provisions for the protection, maintenance and enhancement of fish and wildlife and the regulation for their use are established in many laws and regulations involving a multitude of Federal and State administrative structures, the effective stewardship of fish and wildlife requires the cooperation of the several States and the Federal Government.
( c ) It is the intent of the Secretary to strengthen and support, to the maximum legal extent possible, the missions of the States[1] and the Department of the Interior to conserve and manage effectively the nation's fish and wildlife. It is, therefore, important that a Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Policy be implemented to coordinate and facilitate the efforts of Federal and State agencies in the attainment of this objective.
Footnotes -
24.1
[1]“States” refers to all of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands and other territorial possessions, and the constituent units of government upon which these entities may have conferred authorities related to fish and wildlife matters.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC.

 v.

JOAN LICHTMAN

 v.

MARVIN LEVIN, MARY DUDEN,

STANTON OSWALD, WILLIAM

LEDERER, E. GERALD RIESENBACH,

JON SIRLIN, DANA PLON AND PETER

LESSER

PETITION OF: JOAN LICHTMAN

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 313 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Leave to Supplement

and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are DENIED.
### §3306. Limitations on use of funds

#### (a) Use for religious purposes

None of the funds made available under this subchapter may be used for study at any school or department of divinity or for any religious worship or sectarian activity.

#### (b) Interest on funds

No interest or other income on any funds made available under this subchapter shall be used for any purpose other than those for which such funds may be used.

#### (c) Payments

#### (1) In general

Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the Secretary shall make payments to grantees under this subchapter in two payments—

(A) one payment to be made no later than October 1 of each fiscal year in an amount equal to one-half the amount paid during the preceding fiscal year to the grantee or a contractor that has elected to have the provisions of this subchapter apply, and

(B) the second payment consisting of the remainder to which the grantee or contractor is entitled for the fiscal year to be made by no later than January 1 of the fiscal year.

#### (2) New grantees

For any tribe for which no payment was made under this subchapter in the preceding fiscal year, full payment of the amount computed for each fiscal year shall be made by January 1 of the fiscal year.

#### (d) Investment of funds

#### (1) Treatment as tribal property

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any interest or investment income that accrues on any funds provided under this subchapter after such funds are paid to the Indian tribe or tribal organization and before such funds are expended for the purpose for which such funds were provided under this subchapter shall be the property of the Indian tribe or tribal organization and shall not be taken into account by any officer or employee of the Federal Government in determining whether to provide assistance, or the amount of assistance, under any provision of Federal law.

#### (2) Investment requirements

Funds provided under this subchapter may be—

(A) invested by the Indian tribe or tribal organization only in obligations of the United States or in obligations or securities that are guaranteed or insured by the United States, or

(B) deposited only into accounts that are insured by an agency or instrumentality of the United States.

#### (e) Recoveries

For the purposes of under recovery and over recovery determinations by any Federal agency for any other funds, from whatever source derived, funds received under this subchapter shall not be taken into consideration.

(Pub. L. 102–325, title XIII, §1316, July 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 801.)
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                               AGREEMENT FOR RENT

Tenee : Dong Myung Seo

Tenant : Liquidmetal Korea Ltd.
         President Sung Taek Hong

This Lease Agreement for Rent ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and
between Mr. Dong Myung Seo ("Lessor") and Liquidmetal Korea, Ltd. a company duly
organized and existing under the laws of Republic of Korea ("Lessee").

NOW, THEREFORE the parties hereby agree as follows;

ARTICLE 1 (PURPOSE)

The purpose of this Agreement is for Lessee to rent the Factory and Land from
Lessor for its operation.

Location : 1Block 2Lot, JuMul Industrial Complex,KyungSeo-Dong, Incheon-Si,
            Kyunggi-Do, Korea

Space : 2,083.87 Square meter (22,430.78 Square foot, 631.47Pyung)
        Lease for only 630Pyung after negotiation

ARTICLE 2 ( KEY MONEY DEPOSIT )

         Lessee shall make payment Key money deposit of 120,000,000won upon the
agreement.

ARTICLE 3 (RENT)

         Lessee shall make payment at the end of every month for 12,000,000won.

ARTICLE 4 (PERIOD OF RENT)

         Lease term shall be commenced March 1st 2003 to the End of Feb 2005 and
also if there is any no conflict between both parties regarding lease term, then
lease shall extend 1 year automatically.

         If Lessee does not want to extend to rent for Land and Building, Lessee
must
<PAGE>

inform to Lesser before 6 month from the lease final termination date.

ARTICLE 5 (TERMINATION)

In the case where any of the parties hereto breaches this Agreement, the
non-defaulting party shall notify the defaulting party to remedy the breach
within a reasonable period. If the defaulting party does not remedy within the
period, the non-defaulting party may terminate this Agreement.

           .
ARTICLE 6 (APPLICATION OF LAW AND JURISDICTION)

6.1      Any matters not specifically stipulated herein shall be determined in
         accordance with the general commercial practices and relevant laws and
         regulations.

6.2      The court having jurisdiction over the place where the principal office
         of Lessee is located shall be the competent court for matters related
         to this Agreement.

                                  February 2003

Tenee : Dong Myung Seo(411224-1046913)
        Address : 1337-160, GreenTown, Jung2-Dong, WonMi-Gu,BuCheon-Si,
Gyunggi-Do, Korea

Tenant : Liquidmetal Korea Ltd.
         President Sung Taek Hong

                                 --------------

                             TRANSLATION CERTIFICATE

The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing is a fair and accurate
English translation of the original Agreement for Rent, which is in the Korean
language.



By:    /s/ YM Lee
   ---------------------------------------
       YM Lee, Chief Financial Officer of
       Liquidmetal Korea Co., Ltd.
SERVED : FEBRUAR Y 28 , 201 2 ;['R^RTMLNTC F U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N --.r^^cj \^p^\]:\]\Q[\'> ^ OFFIC E O FHEARING S '''"'" " " "' ' WASHINGTON , D C ;[1I 7 IT R-^ qp j

- I H I N THE MATTERO F GREENWOO D CHEVROLE T FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . FAA-201 I -048 2 

### NOTIC E O FHEARIN GDATE S Paragrap h#2 o f

th e Procedural Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , the partie s b e andar e hereb y ORDERE D to adher e t o th e followin g procedural schedule :

.. . On o r before Jun e I , 20/2 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery incluJing , hu t no t limite dlo , depositions , document production, response s to productio n request s and/o r

interrogatories . I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e (he y shal l submi t

th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i n atimel y manner.. . NOTIC E I S HEREB Y GIVE N tha t testimon y andevidenc e will b e heardan dconsidere d o n Jun e 1 1 an d12 , 2012 , inclusive, i n th e U.S . Ta x Court : Roo m2-1350 , Federa l Buildin g an dU.S . Courthouse , 45 0 Golde n Gat e Avenue , Sa n Francisco , C A 94102 . Hearing s wil l commenc e a t 9:0 0 a.m . an

dconclud e a

t 4:3 0 p.m . eac hday . Th e partie s shoul dvacate th e courthous e o n o r before 5:0 0 p.m . eachday . Settle dcase s wil l no t

b e remove dfro mth e docke t unti l th e Judg e receive s th e prope r pleading(s) . Pleading s ma y b e forwarde db y fax , expres s mail , courie r o r posta l service . S O ORDERED .

RichardC . Goodwi n ^ ^ U.S . Administrativ e La

w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e ListFDMSNo . FAA-2011-048 2 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention ; Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Housto n N . Tuel , Jr. , Respondent' s Counse l La w Office s o f

Housto n Tue l 155 0 Harbo r

Blvd. , Suit e 20 6 Wes t Sacramento , C A 9569 1 TEL : 916-376-010 0 FAX : 916-376-029 9 Lis aJ . Toscano , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AWP- 7 Western-Pacifi c Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL ; 310-725-711 0 FAX ; 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Staf

f Assistant/Paralega l FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Scrx'ic c wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedconrier , us e Ui

c followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Adnunistralion . 600 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suile 2W1000 . Wasliingion , D

C 20591 , Allcnlion : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
Exhibit 31.2

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Stephen B. Waters,certify that:

1.    I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Growth FundXXII, LP;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
#### Joseph A. Didier, Appellant, v. Frank C. Clark, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. So opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Neame,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                    /s/ Michael Neame
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Michael Neame
                                    President and
                                    Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  November 14, 2003
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: April 23, 2015 518998

________________________________ In the Matter of JAHMEL CLARK, Appellant, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: February 24, 2015 Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Jahmel Clark, Wallkill, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from that part of a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough, J.), entered May 6, 2014 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule. Judgment affirmed. No opinion.-2- 518998

Peters, P.J., Garry, Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court