alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 23.9 Performance bond. ( a ) ( 1 ) Upon approval of an exploration plan or mining plan, the operator shall be required to file a suitable performance bond of not less than $2,000 with satisfactory surety, payable to the Secretary of the Interior, and the bond shall be conditioned upon the faithful compliance with applicable regulations, the terms and conditions of the permit, lease, or contract, and the exploration or mining plan as approved, amended or supplemented. The bond shall be in an amount sufficient to satisfy the reclamation requirements of an approved exploration or mining plan, or an approved partial or supplemental plan. In determining the amount of the bond consideration shall be given to the character and nature of the reclamation requirements and the estimated costs of reclamation in the event that the operator forfeits his performance bond.
( 2 ) In lieu of a performance bond an operator may elect to deposit cash or negotiable bonds of the U.S. Government. The cash deposit or the market value of such securities shall be equal at least to the required sum of the bond.
( b ) A bond may be a nationwide or statewide bond which the operator has filed with the Department under the provisions of the applicable leasing regulations in subchapter C of chapter II of this title, if the terms and conditions thereof are sufficient to comply with the regulations in this part.
( c ) The district manager shall set the amount of a bond and take the necessary action for an increase or for a complete or partial release of a bond. He shall take action with respect to bonds for leases or permits only after consultation with the mining supervisor.
( d ) Performance bonds will not be required of Federal, State, or other governmental agencies. Where the exploration or mining is actually performed for such Federal, State, or governmental agencies by a contractor who would have to post a bond under the terms of paragraph (a) of this section if he were the operator, such agencies shall require the contractor to furnish a bond payable to the United States which meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. If, for some other purpose, the contractor furnishes a performance bond, an amendment to that bond which meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section will be acceptable in lieu of an additional or separate bond.
[34 FR 852, Jan. 18, 1969, as amended at 35 FR 11237, July 14, 1970]
#### § 2562.2 Qualifications of applicant.

An application must show that the applicant is a citizen of the United States and 21 years of age, and that he has not theretofore applied for land as a trade and manufacturing site. If such site has been applied for and the application not completed, the facts must be shown. If the application is made for an association of citizens or a corporation, the qualifications of each member of the organization must be shown. In the case of a corporation, proof of incorporation must be established by the certificate of the officer having custody of the records of incorporation at the place of its formation and it must be shown that the corporation is authorized to hold land in Alaska.
#### Murray Rosenblum, Respondent, v. Family Finance Corporation, Appellant.

No opinion. Hagarty, Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Coast Guard 

          - [USCG-2004-19167] 

# AGENCY:

Coast Guard, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice is to inform the public that on August 9, 2004, President Bush signed the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 which, in part, increases the monetary civil penalty amount the Coast Guard can levy for a violation of bridge regulations and statutes. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

If you have questions on this notice, call Chris Jaufmann, Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-0368. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

33 U.S.C 495(b), 499(c), 502(c), and 533(b), authorizes assessing penalties for violations of bridge regulations found in 33 CFR parts 115, 116, 117, and 118. The maximum penalty amount that could be levied per bridge violation per day was $1,000. In 1997, the maximum penalty amount was raised to $1,100 to adjust for inflation. 

On August 9, 2004 President Bush signed the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004 into law. (Pub. L. 108-293) section 601 of this act, raises the maximum civil penalty amount that the Coast Guard can levy per bridge violation per day from $1,100 to $5000 for the remainder of 2004. The Act then raises that amount by $5000 increments at the start of each calendar year until 2008 when the maximum amount allowed per violation per day will be $25,000. Thus, the penalty is $5,000 for a violation occurring in 2004; $10,000 for a violation occurring in 2005; $15,000 for a violation occurring in 2006; $20,000 for a violation occurring in 2007; and $25,000 for a violation occurring in 2008 and every year after that. This increase took effect immediately upon signature. 

      ( print page 57337)    
Dated: September 20, 2004. 

N.E. Mpras, 

Chief, Office of Bridge Administration. 

[FR Doc. 04-21527 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
### §3712. Indian participation in land management activities

#### (a) Tribal recognition

The Secretary shall conduct all land management activities on Indian agricultural land in accordance with goals and objectives set forth in the approved agricultural resource management plan, in an integrated resource management plan, and in accordance with all tribal laws and ordinances, except in specific instances where such compliance would be contrary to the trust responsibility of the United States.

#### (b) Tribal laws

Unless otherwise prohibited by Federal law, the Secretary shall comply with tribal laws and ordinances pertaining to Indian agricultural lands, including laws regulating the environment and historic or cultural preservation, and laws or ordinances adopted by the tribal government to regulate land use or other activities under tribal jurisdiction. The Secretary shall—

(1) provide assistance in the enforcement of such tribal laws;

(2) provide notice of such laws to persons or entities undertaking activities on Indian agricultural lands; and

(3) upon the request of an Indian tribe, require appropriate Federal officials to appear in tribal forums.

#### (c) Waiver of regulations

In any case in which a regulation or administrative policy of the Department of the Interior conflicts with the objectives of the agricultural resource management plan provided for in section 3711 of this title, or with a tribal law, the Secretary may waive the application of such regulation or administrative policy unless such waiver would constitute a violation of a Federal statute or judicial decision or would conflict with his general trust responsibility under Federal law.

#### (d) Sovereign immunity

This section does not constitute a waiver of the sovereign immunity of the United States, nor does it authorize tribal justice systems to review actions of the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 103–177, title I, §102, Dec. 3, 1993, 107 Stat. 2015.)
----

|   | 1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and   results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 12, 2011 |   | By:    | /s/ Michael L. Peterson                                                     |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   |   | Michael L. PetersonInterim President and CEO andPrincipal Executive Officer |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         194,182
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,772
<INVENTORY>                                     35,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               474,050
<PP&E>                                         805,291
<DEPRECIATION>                                 690,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 767,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,069,642
<BONDS>                                         15,398
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       162,396
<OTHER-SE>                                   (480,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   767,351
<SALES>                                         12,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,930
<CGS>                                           21,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,289,421
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,955,363)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,955,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,955,363)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
### §1134. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–660, §4, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 911, which exempted funds distributed under the provisions of this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 23

                       [LETTERHEAD OF ARMANDO C. IBARRA]


January  9, 2001


TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

The firm of Armando C. Ibarra, Certified Public Accountant,  APC consents to the
inclusion of my report of November 29, 2001, on the financial  statements of San
Jose  International,  Inc.,  as of September  30, 2001,  in any filings that are
necessary  now or in the  near  future  with the U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


Very truly yours,

/s/ ARMANDO IBARRA, C.P.A.
----------------------------
ARMANDO IBARRA, C.P.A.
§ 2520.0-1 Purpose. ( a ) It is the purpose of the statutes governing desert-land entries to encourage and promote the reclamation, by irrigation, of the arid and semiarid public lands of the Western States through individual effort and private capital, it being assumed that settlement and occupation will naturally follow when the lands have thus been rendered more productive and habitable.
#### John Cahill, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.; Clarke, J., dissented.
(No. 4645

#### James E. Husband, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June*24, 1955.

James E. Husband, Claimant, pro se.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Fearer, J.

A complaint, consisting of Two Counts, was filed herein by claimant, James E. Husband, on September 24, 1954. On January 28, 1955, a motion was filed by claimant for summary judgment, and, on February 25, 1955, an order was entered by this Court denying said motion. *200On March 25, 1955, respondent filed a motion to strike and dismiss claimant’s complaint, and, on April 11, 1955, a motion to disallow the suggestion of respondent was filed by claimant.

Count I of the complaint was predicated upon allegations of malpractice of nurses employed by respondent at the State Hospital, Chester, Illinois. However, in said Count no allegations are set forth of negligence of respondent’s agents, or of any injury received by claimant, while an inmate at Chester, Illinois. Had there been sufficient facts set forth to constitute a malpractice case, Count I would have to be denied for the reason that claimant alleges in paragraph 3 the tortious acts were committed prior to August of 1952, which was more than two years prior to the filing of claimant’s complaint.

Rule 31 of the Court of Claims, at the time this claim was filed, provided for a two year limitation of claims of this nature, which conforms to the limitations statute of the State of Illinois for the filing of claims within a period of two years from the date the action accrued, 1953 Ill. Rev. Stats., Chap. 83, Sec. 15; Chap. 37, Sec. 439.22.

Count I of the complaint is also indefinite, uncertain and vague.

As to Count II, the allegations set forth therein do not constitute a cause of action against respondent, and, if there was a claim, it would be barred by the statute of limitations, Chap. 37, Sec. 439.22, Ill. Rev. Stats.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that the complaint filed herein be dismissed.
§ 666.200 Under what circumstances is a State eligible for an Incentive Grant? A State is eligible to apply for an Incentive Grant if its performance for the immediately preceding year exceeds: ( a ) The State's negotiated levels of performance for the required core indicators for the adult, dislocated worker and youth programs under title I of WIA as well as the customer satisfaction indicators for WIA title I programs;
( b ) The adjusted levels of performance for title II Adult Education and Family Literacy programs; and
( c ) The adjusted levels of performance under section 113 of the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Technical Education Act (20 U.S.C. 2301 *et seq.*). (WIA sec. 503.)
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Clarence Roberts, *a/k/a*William Roberts, Defendant-Appellant.

(Nos. 58122-27 cons.;

First District (2nd Division) —

July 10, 1973.

No brief filed for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Assistant State’s Attorney, of Counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

LEIGHTON, J., took no part.
```

[House Document 115-64]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

115th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - House Document 115-64
 
 AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR MONTHLY BASIC PAY INCREASES FOR THE UNIFORMED 
                                SERVICES

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                     THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

AN ALTERNATIVE PLAN FOR MONTHLY BASIC PAY INCREASES FOR MEMBERS OF THE 
 UNIFORMED SERVICES FOR 2018, PURSUANT TO 37 U.S.C. 1009(e)(1); PUBLIC 
                 LAW 96-342, SEC. 803; (94 STAT. 1091)

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

  September 1, 2017.--Referred to the Committee on Armed Services and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                   ______

                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

69-011                         WASHINGTON : 2017 
                          
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                         
                                           The White House,
                                       Washington, August 31, 2017.
Hon. Paul D. Ryan,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: I am transmitting an alternative plan for 
monthly basic pay increases for members of the uniformed 
services for 2018.
    I strongly support our men and women in uniform, who are 
the greatest fighting force in the world and the guardians of 
American freedom. As our country continues to recover from 
serious economic conditions affecting the general welfare, we 
must work to rebuild our military's readiness and capabilities.
    Accordingly, I have determined it is appropriate to 
exercise my authority under section 1009(e) of title 37, United 
States Code, to set the 2018 monthly basic pay increase at 2.1 
percent. This decision is consistent with my fiscal year 2018 
Budget and it will not materially affect the Federal 
Government's ability to attract and retain well-qualified 
members for the uniformed services.
    The adjustments described above shall take effect on 
January 1, 2018.
            Sincerely,
                                                   Donald J. Trump.

                                  [all]
```
§ 2563.0-3 Authority. ( a ) The Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1364; 43 U.S.C. 687a), as amended, authorizes the sale as a homestead or headquarters of not to exceed five acres of unreserved public lands in Alaska at the rate of $2.50 per acre, to any citizen of the United States 21 years of age employed by citizens of the United States, association of such citizens, or by corporations organized under the laws of the United States, or of any State or Territory, whose employer is engaged in trade, manufacture, or other productive industry in Alaska, and to any such person who is himself engaged in trade, manufacture or other productive industry in Alaska. The lands must be nonmineral in character except that lands that may be valuable for coal, oil, or gas deposits are subject to disposition under the provisions of the Act of March 8, 1922 (42 Stat. 415, 43 U.S.C. 270-11, 270-12), as amended.
( b ) The Act of May 26, 1934 (48 Stat. 809; 43 U.S.C. 687a) amended section 10 of the Act of May 14, 1898 (30 Stat. 413), as amended by the Act of March 3, 1927 (44 Stat. 1364), so as to provide that any citizen, after occupying land of the character described in said section of a homestead or headquarters, in a habitable house not less than 5 months each year for 3 years, may purchase such tract, not exceeding 5 acres, in a reasonably compact form, without a showing as to his employment or business, upon the payment of $2.50 per acre, the minimum payment for any one tract to be $10.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 243

 253

 249

 250

 230

 214

 204

 201

 198

 193

 204

 198

 204

 215

 206

 220

 220

 214

 218

 221

 218

 219

 211

 211

 241

 210

 216

 221

 223

 227

 223

 222

 224

 200

 180

 170

 168

 167

 170

 176

 179

 182

 187

 189

 195

 196

 197

 197

 195

 197

 198

 195

 188

 193

 172

 192

 194

 194

 191

 187

 232

 231

 235

 224

 204

 190

 184

 182

 183

 185

 187

 188

 193

 197

 200

 205

 206

 206

 204

 208

 208

 204

 203

 202

 205

 203

 205

 209

 211

 210

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 721.42

 721.62

 721.81

 722.01

 722.18

 722.35

 722.54

 722.67

 722.80

 722.95

 723.09

 723.23

 723.33

 723.44

 723.64

 723.90

 724.00

 724.09

 724.16

 724.24

 724.32

 724.39

 724.46

 721.38

 719.53

 716.26

 712.02

 707.00

 707.81

 708.12

 708.42

 1,238

 1,245

 1,252

 1,259

 1,266

 1,272

 1,279

 1,284

 1,289

 1,294

 1,299

 1,305

 1,309

 1,313

 1,320

 1,330

 1,334

 1,338

 1,340

 1,343

 1,346

 1,349

 1,352

 1,236

 1,169

 1,057

 922

 777

 800

 808

 817

STORAGE

+8

+7

+7

+7

+7

+6

+7

+5

+5

+5

+5

+6

+4

+4

+7

+10

+4

+4

+2

+3

+3

+3

+3

-116

-67

-112

-135

-145

+23

+8

+9

CHANGE

5

5

5

5

5

4

5

4

4

4

4

4

3

3

5

6

3

3

2

3

3

3

3

-9

-5

-11

-18

-34

13

5

6

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 49

 29

 45

 50

 39

 1

 1

 1

 0850

 0935

 0905

TIME

 .03

 .05

 .05

COPPER

 .31

 .34

 .35

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2009 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 19, 2009

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -413 38 0 238

ACRE-FEET -413 75 0 472

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 472

 472

 1,230

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .002

 .002

 .002
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of 24Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Neame,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            /s/ Michael Neame
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Michael Neame
                                            President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  April 15, 2003