alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 21
                                       U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                              Central Valley Operations Office

                                       Central Valley Project - California
Monthly Diversions in AF                              2001

                            Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct   Nov   Dec    Total

CANALS

Contra Costa                1208   4316  10100  18978  14355  24062  14642   5659   4078   4270  4261  3765   109694
Delta-Mendota             168289 195460 115795 129562  52680 178325 254283 253971 242818 222497223098225712  2262490
Actual Fed Dos Amigos      88549  78408  58584  72298 124318 196448 179449 136449  44783  34062 19758 21039  1054145
Madera                       436      0      0  19807  28072  46650  46055  33440  10782   5230     0     0   190472
Friant-Kern                12498  10830  17663  35830 126212 187010 164460 100673  58519  48499  8152  5915   776261
Corning                       32      0    296    722   3342   3473   4013   3818   2583   1874   393    22    20568
Folsom-South                2247   1327   1521   1404   2025   2255   2725   2719   2424   2432  1734  1742    24555
Sly Park - Camino Conduit    776    926    964   1142   2214   3142   3433   3550   2717   1886  1321  1204    23275
Tehama-Colusa                964    182   4130  17788  46192  68149  61485  41064  20311  10842    50     0   271157

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel             1872   1132   1544   2095   2737   2984  30553   2927   2388   2461  1218  1038    52949

KLAMATH PROJECT

"A" Canal Upper Klamath        0      0      0      0      0    840  11560  37650      0      0     0     0    50050
Klamath Drainage District  18468   1466      0      0      0    588   3887  16991   6219    740     0 12320    60679
Clear Lake Reservoir           0      0      0    170   6590   6890   7310   8340   5560      0     0     0    34860
Gerber Reservoir               0      0      0    330   7820   7890   7750   7710   5100      0     0     0    36600
Klamath River to Lost Riv      0      0      0      0      0      0   4022      0    897      0     0     0     4919

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek                    0      0    477  13112  18928  18893  18689  17590  14850   8669     0     0   111208
South Canal                    0      0    298   8201  13061  13143  12532  11784   9743   5541     0     0    74303
North Canal                    0      0    179   4911   5867   5750   6157   5806   5107   3128     0     0    36905

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal           3354   2733   6167  16767  34677  35231  32908  30471  21503  10374  2271  3418   199874


NA = Not Available at time of printing report.
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.2 Application of this part. ( a ) This part applies to any program for which Federal financial assistance is authorized under a law administered by the Department, including programs and activities that are federally-assisted under the laws listed in appendix A to this subpart. It applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended after the effective date of the regulation pursuant to an application approved prior to such effective date. This part does not apply to ( 1 ) any Federal financial assistance by way of insurance or guaranty contracts,
( 2 ) money paid, property transferred, or other assistance extended before the effective date of this part,
( 3 ) any assistance to any individual who is the ultimate beneficiary, or
( 4 ) except to the extent described in § 17.3, any employment practice, under any such program, of any employer, employment agency, or labor organization. The fact that a statute under which Federal financial assistance is extended to a program or activity is not listed in appendix A to subpart A shall not mean, if title VI is otherwise applicable, that such program or activity is not covered. Other statutes now in force or hereafter enacted may be added to this list by notice published in the Federal Register.
( b ) In any program receiving Federal financial assistance in the form, or for the acquisition, of real property or an interest in real property, to the extent that rights to space on, over, or under any such property are included as part of the program receiving that assistance, the nondiscrimination requirement of that part shall extend to any facility located wholly or in part of the space.
[29 FR 16293, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 38 FR 17975, July 5, 1973; 43 FR 4259, Feb. 1, 1978]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 723.14

 723.28

 723.40

 723.51

 723.62

 723.73

 723.84

 723.94

 724.03

 724.13

 724.24

 724.34

 724.43

 724.53

 724.66

 724.77

 720.56

 720.66

 720.76

 720.85

 720.94

 721.03

 721.12

 721.22

 721.31

 721.41

 721.50

 721.60

 721.68

 721.83

 721.93

 1,301

 1,307

 1,311

 1,315

 1,320

 1,324

 1,328

 1,332

 1,335

 1,339

 1,343

 1,347

 1,351

 1,355

 1,360

 1,364

 1,206

 1,210

 1,213

 1,217

 1,220

 1,223

 1,226

 1,230

 1,233

 1,237

 1,241

 1,244

 1,247

 1,253

 1,256

STORAGE

+4

+6

+4

+4

+5

+4

+4

+4

+3

+4

+4

+4

+4

+4

+5

+4

-158

+4

+3

+4

+3

+3

+3

+4

+3

+4

+4

+3

+3

+6

+3

CHANGE

5

6

5

5

6

5

5

5

5

4

4

4

5

4

5

5

-11

5

5

5

5

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

5

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 3

 69

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2011 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 3, 2012

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -41 129 0 145

ACRE-FEET -41 256 0 288

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 288

 288

 1,297

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. is Awarded Opportunity to Build Chemical Storage Terminal in
Singapore

LONDON, April 24, 2008 - Stolt-Nielsen S.A. (Oslo Bors: SNI) announced today
that its Stolt Tankers & Terminals ("ST&T") division received a formal notice
from the Singapore Economic Development Board ("EDB") that they were awarded the
opportunity to construct a chemical storage terminal on 15 hectares of vacant
land on Jurong Island, Singapore.

"We are pleased to have been chosen as the preferred chemical logistics service
provider, which opens the way for the construction of a new state-of-the-art
terminal to meet the growing needs for bulk-liquid storage of chemical
manufacturers and customers in the South-East Asia region," said Andrew
Pickering, Managing Director Asia Pacific. "Stolt-Nielsen already has a
significant presence in the region with commercial and ship management offices,
tank container depots, bulk-liquid storage terminals, and deep sea and regional
shipping networks. Jurong Island is a vital link in the global supply chain for
bulk-liquid chemicals and we look forward to expanding our relationships and
presence there."

The development of the site is subject to a number of additional agreements
between local authorities and ST&T, as well as Stolt-Nielsen S.A. board
approval. The terminal is planned for completion during the second half of 2010
at which point it will the have a total capacity of 325,000 cubic meters of bulk
liquid storage.

Contacts:

     Jan Chr. Engelhardtsen
     U.K. +44 (0) 20 7611 8972
     j.engelhardtsen@stolt.com

     Jens F. Gruner-Hegge
     U.K. +44 (0) 20 7611 8985
     j.gruner-hegge@stolt.com

About Stolt-Nielsen S.A.
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. (the "Company") is one of the world's leading providers of
transportation services for bulk liquid chemicals, edible oils, acids, and other
specialty liquids. The Company, through the parcel tanker, tank container,
terminal, rail and barge services of its wholly owned subsidiaries Stolt Tankers
& Terminals and Stolt Tank Containers, provides integrated transportation
solutions for its customers. Stolt Sea Farm, wholly owned by the Company,
produces and markets high quality turbot, sole, sturgeon and caviar.
#### § 2523.2 Amounts to be paid.

No fees or commissions are required of persons making entry under the desert land laws except such fees as are paid to the officers for taking the affidavits and proofs. Unless the entry be perfected under the Act of February 14, 1934 (48 Stat. 349; 43 U.S.C. 339), the only payments made to the Government are the original payment of 25 cents an acre at the time of making the application and the final payment of $1 an acre, to be paid at the time of making the final proof. On all final proofs made before the authorizing officer, the claimant must pay to the authorizing officer the costs of reducing the testimony to writing, as determined by the authorizing officer. No proof shall be accepted or approved until all charges have been paid.

[35 FR 9588, June 13, 1970]
#### § 2568.64 Are there different requirements for giving an allotment to the estate of a deceased veteran?

No, the estate of the deceased veteran eligible under § 2568.60 must meet the same requirements for a Native allotment as other living Alaska Native veterans. In addition, a deceased veteran must have been a resident of Alaska at the time of death.
##### 



Exhibit  99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaydon Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brian P.
Campbell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|             |  |                                                                                            
|------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|May 13, 2003 |  | /s/ Brian P. Campbell
Brian P. Campbell
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 11


                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

             For the Nine Month Period Ended September 30,
                             2000 and 1999


(Dollars in Thousands)
                                             2000          1999
<S>                                          <C>           <C>
Primary
  Net Income                                 $          3,844       $           3,878
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                   2,833,727               2,872,718
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                        None                    None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                                 2,833,727               2,872,718

      Primary earnings per common
        share                                $    1.36     $    1.35


Assuming full dilution
  Net Income                                 $          3,844       $           3,878
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                   2,833,727               2,872,718
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                        None                    None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                                 2,833,727               2,872,718

      Earnings per common share
        assuming full dilution               $    1.36     $    1.35


</TABLE>


                                   21
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. 

## FILED United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit JUL 19 2002 Charles R. Fulbruge Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30070 Summary Calendar

RYAN RICHARD, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BARON KAYLO, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-2294-H

- - - - - - - - - - Before DeMOSS, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ryan Richard, Louisiana prisoner # 353246, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas relief. Richard argues that 1) his guilty plea was not knowingly and intelligently made because the trial court failed to inform him of the nature of, and elements comprising, the manslaughter offense, and 2) he received ineffective assistanceNo. 02-30070 -2- of counsel because his attorney failed to advise him of the nature and elements of manslaughter. Richard has filed a letter with this court, which we construe as a motion seeking reconsideration of the clerk’s office’s determination that Richard’s reply brief was untimely filed. Because the Appellee has not filed a response opposing Richard’s request, and in the interest of affording Richard every advantage in this pro se appeal, his motion is GRANTED. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and hold that Richard fails to meet his burden of establishing that the state court’s adjudication of his claims resulted in a decision that was contrary to Federal law, or was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); Boykin v. Alabama , 395 U.S. 238, 244 (1969); Henderson v. Morgan , 426 U.S. 637, 646-47 (1976); Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Bonvillain v. Blackburn , 780 F.2d 1248, 1251 (5th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
#### § 15.6 Markers.

No person shall willfully mark, deface or injure in any way, or displace, remove or tamper with any Preserve signs, notices or placards, whether temporary or permanent, or with any monuments, stakes, posts or other boundary markers.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 811.45

 811.45

 811.48

 811.47

 811.45

 811.48

 811.51

 811.54

 811.55

 811.56

 811.55

 811.55

 811.56

 811.56

 811.57

 811.57

 811.58

 811.60

 811.63

 811.66

 811.70

 811.72

 811.72

 811.73

 811.74

 811.74

 811.76

 811.78

 811.80

 811.82

 811.84

 19.97

 19.97

 19.99

 19.98

 19.97

 19.99

 20.01

 20.04

 20.04

 20.05

 20.04

 20.04

 20.05

 20.05

 20.06

 20.06

 20.07

 20.08

 20.11

 20.13

 20.16

 20.17

 20.17

 20.18

 20.19

 20.19

 20.20

 20.22

 20.24

 20.25

 20.27

STORAGE

-0.01

+0.00

+0.02

-0.01

-0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.01

+0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.01

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.03

+0.02

+0.00

+0.01

+0.01

+0.00

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

CHANGE

9

13

27

11

8

25

27

26

18

18

11

14

18

15

18

15

18

22

25

24

29

21

13

17

17

13

20

19

20

21

20

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

OUTLET

 3

 3

 5

 5

 6

 3

 5

 4

 4

 4

 5

 4

 4

 5

 4

 5

 4

 4

 3

 2

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 1

 2

 3

 2

C.F.S.

 .14

 .13

 .20

 .19

 .25

 .13

 .20

 .15

 .18

 .16

 .20

 .17

 .17

 .20

 .17

 .19

 .17

 .17

 .11

 .09

 .15

 .13

 .14

 .12

 .13

 .12

 .10

 .04

 .07

 .11

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .05

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 RUN DATE: 11/09/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.31 572 310 0 111 4.56 .13

ACRE-FEET +310 1,135 615 0 220

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 615

 615

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .13

JULY 1, 2015 1.00

 19.98

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties Growth Fund XXII;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 13, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters



Vice President of Fox Capital Management Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
#### Benjamin V. Karaban, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Valerie Karaban, Deceased, Appellant, v. Thomas C. Moore, Respondent.

*860No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §1291. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–456, §1, Oct. 3, 1972, 86 Stat. 762, which provided for certain judgment funds, after payment of attorney fees and other expenses, to be distributed as provided in this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
|  | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |                         |                |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------|
| Date:  September      13, 2010 |                         | /s/      James Doss |
|                                     | James      Doss              |
|                                     | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
### §8810. Applicability to certain natural gas projects

Nothing in this subtitle or the amendments made by this subtitle shall apply with respect to any activity relating to a project described in subsection (a) of section 8783 of this title to which the exception under that section applies at the time of the activity.

(Pub. L. 112–239, div. A, title XII, §1254, Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2018.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle D (§§1241–1255) of title XII of div. A of Pub. L. 112–239, Jan. 2, 2013, 126 Stat. 2004, known as the Iran Freedom and Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of subtitle D to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8801 of this title and Tables.
#### Theodore Birke v. Held-Foster Corporation.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Present ■— Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 810.]