alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Press Release

[Graphic omitted] Ahold

                                                        Royal Ahold
                                                        Corporate Communications

                                                 Date:  August 13, 2003
                                 For more information:  +31 75 659 57 20


Ahold divests Dutch restaurant 'De Walvis'

Zaandam, The Netherlands, August 13, 2003 - Ahold today announced the divestment
of its Dutch restaurant 'De Hoop op d'Swarte Walvis' (De Walvis) located in
Zaandam. The Nedstede Group has acquired the restaurant through an asset sale
and purchase agreement that includes inventory and real estate. The agreement
will take effect on September 8, 2003.  The transaction sum was not disclosed.

The Nedstede Group is an Amsterdam-based Dutch real estate and investment
company.

All 26 associates currently working at the restaurant will transfer to the new
owner. De Walvis has been part of Ahold for several decades. The divestment of
the restaurant is part of Ahold's strategic plan to restructure its portfolio to
focus on core activities and to concentrate on its mature and most stable
markets.


Ahold Corporate Communications +31 75 659 57 20


                                                  Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                  P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                  The Netherlands
                                                  Phone:  +31 (0)75 659 5720
http://www.ahold.com                              Fax:    +31 (0)75 659 8302
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A, Amendment No. 1, for the period ending April 30,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Timothy Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By:  /s/ Timothy Morris
     ---------------------------------------------
         Timothy Morris
         Chief Executive Officer


August 22, 2006
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*James E. Williams, Defendant-Appellee.

(No. 57267;

First District (5th Division)

June 7, 1974.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Kenneth L. Gillis and Barry Rand Elden, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

David Lincoln Ader, of Chicago, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                            1,197,509
<SECURITIES>                      1,111,221
<RECEIVABLES>                       775,188
<ALLOWANCES>                         22,227
<INVENTORY>                       2,409,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  5,818,975
<PP&E>                              629,579
<DEPRECIATION>                      457,993
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    6,084,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               606,516
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             30,786
<OTHER-SE>                        5,447,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      6,084,461
<SALES>                           4,901,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  4,901,897
<CGS>                             2,404,007
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     3,862,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (81,864)       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,120,860         
<INCOME-TAX>                        450,000       
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 670,860    
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        670,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .20
        


</TABLE>
# Tracts (B)

# Reference Cited (B)

# Mineral Potential Definitions

# Abbreviations
Exhibit 32.3


Certification of Chief Accounting
  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Linda A. Nimmons, the Chief Accounting Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350 that:
  (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  /s/ LINDA A. NIMMONSName:
Linda A. NimmonsTitle:
Chief Accounting OfficerDate:
March 4, 2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6090

JOSEPH P. SMITH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

ED BANKS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-95-560-5-H)

Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: March 19, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph P. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Kendrick Cleveland,

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v.

Banks, No. CA-95-560-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 22, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM S32525

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Romel A. ALBERSON Senior Airman (E

- 4) , U.S . Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United Stat es Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 22 January 2019

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Christina M. Jimenez

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct di scharge, confinement for 15 days , and

r eduction to E

- 1. Sentence adjudged 23 April 2018 by SpCM convened at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevad a. For Appellant: Major Meghan R. Glines

- Barney , USAF. For Appellee: Lieutenant Joseph J. Kubler , USAF; Mary Ellen Payne , Esquire

. Before JOHNSON , DENNI S , and LEW IS , Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________ PE R CURIAM : The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Arti clesUnited States v. Alberson , No. ACM S32525

2 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
October 23, 1996


Via Facsimile (847) 317-4662            Via Facsimile (312) 992-1061
The Balcor Company                      Katten Muchin & Zavis
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza           525 West Monroe Street
2355 Waukegan Road                      Suite 1600
Suite A-200                             Chicago, Illinois  60661-3693
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015            Attention:  Daniel J. Perlman
Attention:  Alan Lieberman and
            Ilona Adama

     Re:  Agreement of Sale dated August 29, 1996, by and between Alliance 
          Holdings, L.L.C. and West Villagewood Limited Partnership for 
          Westwood Village Apartments, Irvine, Texas ("Agreement")

     Notice is hereby tendered that Purchaser has elected to extend the Closing
Date under the above-referenced Agreement to December 30, 1996, in accordance
with the terms of Section 8 of the Agreement (as modified by that certain
Second Modification Agreement dated October 2, 1996).

     The Seventy Five Thousand Dollar ($75,000.00) payment required by the
Modification Agreement will be wired to the Escrow Agent on or before October
25, 1996.

                              Alliance Holdings, L.L.C.

                              By: /s/  David O'Keefe
                                   -----------------------------------
                              Its:     Attorney in Fact
<PAGE>
Table 21

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary-Subject to Change Central Valley Project - California

Monthly Diversions in AF 2018

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

CANALS

Contra Costa 5922 5442 1861 14728 13133 10542 12346 11352 10810 10110 7488 6204 109938

Delta-Mendota 204834 101839 168187 113549 102118 161056 237298 260962 240769 250116 150041 240151 2230920

Actual Fed Dos Amigos 54398 102472 18888 49859 97920 134687 148979 107296 67770 57538 35075 12964 887846

Madera 0 280 0 35432 48761 44862 47519 20418 643 0 0 0 197915

Friant-Kern 12532 43413 11070 162611 133401 92973 164968 114674 57272 46251 21509 12303 872977

Corning 0 752 135 311 1153 1989 2312 1888 2572 1468 518 0 13098

Folsom-South 446 720 316 232 1112 1553 1652 1466 1549 1090 995 759 11890

Tehama-Colusa 434 14389 4491 14075 40599 49355 49966 27902 34975 26870 14792 0 277848

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel 863 949 365 1003 1306 1853 2470 2321 1878 1715 1447 322 16492

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek 0 2072 0 3233 12482 13228 14579 13453 10727 6052 2360 0 78186

North Canal 0 1023 0 1170 4558 4836 5409 4959 3921 2537 839 0 29252

South Canal 0 1049 0 2063 7924 8392 9170 8494 6806 3515 1521 0 48934

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal 2594 1869 3682 7490 21551 27730 30623 25740 17650 10988 1928 2180 154025
### §1295. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–456, §5, Oct. 3, 1972, 86 Stat. 763, which related to payments to heirs or legatees of deceased enrollees and minors or persons under legal disability, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


                    ACCELIO CORPORATION ADDRESSES UNSOLICITED
                                 OPEN TEXT OFFER

Ottawa, ON, December 17, 2001 - Accelio Corporation, (NASDAQ: ACLO, TSE: LIO), a
leading global provider of Web-enabled business process solutions, today took
initial steps to address an unsolicited offer by Open Text Corporation (NASDAQ:
OTEX - news; TSE: OTC - news) to acquire all of the outstanding common shares of
Accelio Corporation for a cash price of Cdn. $2.75 per share, or Cdn. $68.5
million on a fully-diluted basis.

In response to Open Text Corporation's offer, the Accelio board of directors
will create an independent committee of the board to evaluate all potential
options for maximizing shareholder value. The board will also engage the
services of an investment banking firm to act as financial adviser.

"We are evaluating all strategic options for Accelio and we will assess all
opportunities including this unsolicited bid," said A. Kevin Francis, president
and chief executive officer, Accelio Corporation. "Ultimately, we are looking to
maximize shareholder value and meet the needs of our customers over the long
term. Once the board has completed a thorough review of this offer with its
professional and financial advisers, we will communicate our recommendation to
our shareholders. In the interim, we urge all shareholders to defer making a
decision until that time."

About Accelio

Accelio Corporation (formerly JetForm Corporation) is a leading global provider
of Web-enabled business process solutions, headquartered in Canada. Accelio
helps organizations to gain sustainable advantage by extending and accelerating
their core business processes. The Accelio family of integrated software
solutions empower organizations to capture, integrate and present strategically
relevant information for employees, partners and customers -- enabling them to
work smarter and more productively.

With fiscal 2000 revenues of over $100 million, and in business since 1982, the
Accelio global distribution network spans every continent, with more than 8.5
million users worldwide. Accelio customers are Global 2000 organizations in the
financial services, banking, manufacturing, utilities and public sectors. For
more information on Accelio, visit: www.accelio.com.

Accelio and the Accelio logo are trademarks of Accelio Corporation. Other
product and company names herein may be trademarks of registered trademarks of
their respective owners.


For more information:
<TABLE>
<S>                                 <C>                              <C>
Susanne Gossage                     Eileen Foley                     Nicola Clarke McIsaac
BenchMark Porter Novelli            Accelio Public Relations         Accelio Investor Relations
416-422-7196                        613-751-4800 ext. 5273           905-947-8485 ext. 3218
sgossage@bmporternovelli.com        efoley@accelio.com               nclarke@accelio.com
</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.6


                                   TARI, INC.
                                1102 Wolfe Avenue
                          Vancouver, British Columbia
                                     Canada



July 24, 2006

Mr. Kim Drossulis,
1632 Sprucemont Street
Sparks, Nevada 89434

Dear Sir:

Re: SP Project, Storey County - Mineral Claims Lease

We hereby confirm our agreement to amend our Lease Agreement dated effective May
15, 2001, as amended,  by replacing  paragraph G of the original  agreement with
the following:

"G.  Schedule of Minimum  Payments  The Lessee  shall pay to the Lessor  minimum
payments,  which shall be advance  payments  of the  Royalty,  of US$2,000  upon
execution  of this lease.  The Lessee may extend this lease upon  payment of the
following:

I       Pay Lessor an additional US$20,000 immediately upon execution of this
        amendment and

2.      Each  annual  payment  thereafter  shall  be  US$50,000  plus an  annual
        increase or decrease  equivalent to the rate of inflation  designated by
        the  Consumer's  Price Index for that year with  execution  year as base
        year.  Each such payment  shall be made by January 9 of each  successive
        year of the lease."

If the foregoing  accurately  sets forth your  understanding  of our  agreement,
kindly sign this Agreement where indicated below, which will then form a binding
agreement between us, subject only to the terms and conditions aforesaid.


Yours truly, TARI, INC.


PER:                               Agreed and accepted on July 24, 2006

                                   /s/ Kim Drossulis
                                   --------------------------------
THEODORE TSAGKARIS                 Kim Drossulis
C.E.O.
#### § 2.224 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 245

 242

 243

 243

 239

 251

 265

 269

 248

 268

 275

 280

 281

 277

 276

 273

 273

 277

 281

 291

 287

 286

 289

 298

 282

 345

 372

 354

 305

 284

 277

 214

 211

 209

 204

 204

 210

 212

 210

 215

 233

 246

 245

 242

 246

 243

 236

 231

 233

 234

 234

 233

 233

 234

 236

 245

 243

 247

 235

 223

 218

 215

 232

 226

 229

 226

 221

 230

 233

 236

 234

 248

 260

 263

 263

 264

 263

 260

 259

 258

 257

 259

 258

 261

 265

 262

 259

 286

 302

 294

 270

 258

 250

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 3, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### SUBCHAPTER XXXIII—INDIAN TRIBES OF OREGON
### §353. Sections inapplicable to certain tribes

The provisions of this Act shall not apply to the Osage Indians, nor to the Five Civilized Tribes, in Oklahoma. Where deeds to tribal lands in the Five Civilized Tribes have been or may be issued, in pursuance of any tribal agreement or Act of Congress, to a person who had died, or who dies before the approval of such deed, the title to the land designated therein shall inure to and become vested in the heirs, devisees, or assigns of such deceased grantee as if the deed had issued to the deceased grantee during life.

(June 25, 1910, ch. 431, §§32, 33, 36 Stat. 863.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is act June 25, 1910, ch. 431, 36 Stat. 855, which enacted sections 47, 93, 151, 202, 337, 344a, 351, 352, 353, 372, 403, 406, 407, and 408 of this title, section 6a–1 of former Title 41, Public Contracts, and section 148 of Title 43, Public Lands, and amended sections 191, 312, 331, 333, and 336 of this title and sections 104 and 107 of former Title 18, Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure. Sections 104 and 107 of former Title 18 were repealed and restated as sections 1853 and 1856 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure, by act June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 683. Section 6a–1 of former Title 41 was repealed and restated as section 6102(e) of Title 41, Public Contracts, by Pub. L. 111–350, §§3, 7(b), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3677, 3855. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

The first and second sentences are from sections 33 and 32, respectively of act June 25, 1910.
### §309a. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated for the purposes of sections 309 and 309a of this title the sum of $25,000,000 for each fiscal year, and not to exceed $1,500,000 of such sum shall be available for administrative purposes.

(Aug. 3, 1956, ch. 930, §2, 70 Stat. 986; Pub. L. 87–273, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 571; Pub. L. 88–230, §1(b), Dec. 23, 1963, 77 Stat. 471; Pub. L. 89–14, Apr. 22, 1965, 79 Stat. 74; Pub. L. 90–252, Feb. 3, 1968, 82 Stat. 4.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1968—Pub. L. 90–252 increased appropriation from $15,000,000 to $25,000,000.

1965—Pub. L. 89–14 increased appropriation from $12,000,000 to $15,000,000.

1963—Pub. L. 88–230 increased appropriation from $7,500,000 to $12,000,000 and amount available for administrative purposes from $1,000,000 to $1,500,000.

1961—Pub. L. 87–273 increased appropriation to $7,500,000 and amount available for administrative purposes to $1,000,000.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00188-CV

__________________

MARIA LUISA MIRELES-POULAT, Appellant

V.

AXA SEGUROS, S.A. DE C.V., Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 457th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-07-09268-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellant, Maria Luisa Mireles-Poulat, filed an unopposed motion to 

dismiss this accelerated appeal. The appellant filed the motion before this Court 

issued a decision in the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). The appellee did not 

file a cross-notice of appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. 

R. App. P. 43.2(f).
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on February 8, 2022

Opinion Delivered April 14, 2022

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
§ 801.2 Definitions and use of terms. ( a ) For purposes of this chapter, except where the content clearly indicates otherwise, the following definitions apply: ( 1 ) *Acts* means the several Acts listed in §§ 801.102 and 802.101 of this chapter, as amended and extended, unless otherwise specified.
( 2 ) *Board* means the Benefits Review Board established by section 21 of the LHWCA (33 U.S.C. 921) as described in § 801.101, and as provided in this part and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 38-72 (38 FR 90). Mention in these regulations of the “permanent Board” refers to the five permanent Board members only.
( 3 ) Chairman or Chairman of the Board means Chairman of the Benefits Review Board. The Chairman of the Board is officially entitled Chief Administrative Appeals Judge.
( 4 ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Labor.
( 5 ) *Department* means the Department of Labor.
( 6 ) *Judge* means an administrative law judge appointed as provided in 5 U.S.C. 3105 and subpart B of 5 CFR part 930, who is qualified to preside at hearings under 5 U.S.C. 557 and is empowered by the Secretary to conduct formal hearings whenever necessary in respect of any claim for benefits or compensation arising under the Acts.
( 7 ) *Chief Administrative Law Judge* means the Chief Administrative Law Judge of the Department of Labor.
( 8 ) *Director* means the Director of the Office of Workers' Compensation Programs of the Department of Labor (hereinafter OWCP).
( 9 ) *Deputy commissioner* means a person appointed as provided in sections 39 and 40 of the LHWCA or his designee, authorized by the Director to make decisions and orders in respect to claims arising under the Acts.
( 10 ) Party or Party in Interest means the Secretary or his designee and any person or business entity directly affected by the decision or order from which an appeal to the Board is taken.
( 11 ) *Day* means calendar day.
( 12 ) *Member* means a member of the Benefits Review Board. Unless specifically stated otherwise, the word “member” shall apply to permanent, temporary and interim members. Permanent Board members are officially entitled Administrative Appeals Judges. Temporary and interim Board members are designated as Acting Administrative Appeals Judges.
( b ) The definitions contained in this part shall not be considered to derogate from the definitions of terms in the respective Acts.
( c ) The definitions pertaining to the Acts contained in the several parts of chapter VI of this title 20 shall be applicable to this chapter as is appropriate.
[52 FR 27290, July 20, 1987, as amended at 52 FR 28640, July 31, 1987]