alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1621g. Health services research

Of the amounts appropriated for the Service in any fiscal year, other than amounts made available for the Indian Health Care Improvement Fund, not less than $200,000 shall be available only for research to further the performance of the health service responsibilities of the Service. Indian tribes and tribal organizations contracting with the Service under the authority of the Indian Self-Determination Act [25 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.] shall be given an equal opportunity to compete for, and receive, research funds under this section.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title II, §208, as added Pub. L. 100–713, title II, §204, Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4812.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination Act, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2206, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§5321 et seq.) of chapter 46 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.
### §9002. Definitions

For the purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "applicant" means any person who, pursuant to the Convention, files an application with the United States Central Authority or a Central Authority of any other party to the Convention for the return of a child alleged to have been wrongfully removed or retained or for arrangements for organizing or securing the effective exercise of rights of access pursuant to the Convention;

(2) the term "Convention" means the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, done at The Hague on October 25, 1980;

(3) the term "Parent Locator Service" means the service established by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 653 of title 42;

(4) the term "petitioner" means any person who, in accordance with this chapter, files a petition in court seeking relief under the Convention;

(5) the term "person" includes any individual, institution, or other legal entity or body;

(6) the term "respondent" means any person against whose interests a petition is filed in court, in accordance with this chapter, which seeks relief under the Convention;

(7) the term "rights of access" means visitation rights;

(8) the term "State" means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States; and

(9) the term "United States Central Authority" means the agency of the Federal Government designated by the President under section 9006(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 100–300, §3, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 437.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" meaning Pub. L. 100–300, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 437, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note under section 9001 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 11602 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
#### Tri-Borough Contracting Company, Appellant, Respondent, *v.*R. V. Wechsler Realty Company, Respondent, Appellant, Impleaded with Lillian B. Wechsler, Respondent, and Another, Defendant.

*Lien*— *counterclaim*— *completion of contract by owner.*

Cross-appeals by the plaintiff and the defendant, R. V. Wechsler Realty Company, from such parts of a judgment of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Queens on the 24th day of June, 1913, as dismiss the complaint and the counterclaim respectively.

Per Curiam:

This action is by contractor against owner for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien. The Special Term dismissed the plaintiff and the defendant on its counterclaim. Both parties appeal. We think that the judgment should be affirmed as to the plaintiff, and should be reversed as to the defendant. The opinion of the learned Special Term shows that the disposition of the defendant was made upon the ground that it “took over the job,” but “finished the work * * * more expensively than called for by specifications.” We think that the evidence did not justify this conclusion. The defendant gave proof sufficient to establish a *prima facie*case on the counterclaim, and such ease was not affected by any proof adduced by the plaintiff. There is no.presumption that the contract price was sufficient to meet the cost of completion by the defendant. *(Brainard*v. *County of*Kings, 155 N. Y. 538.) And the proper inquiry is, what was the amount actually expended in the necessary completion of the contract ? *(Martin*v. *Klahive,*112 App. Div. 347; *Zimmermann*v. *Jourgensen,*14 N. Y. Supp. 648.) The court probably checked the defendant in the full development of its case on the counterclaim by a ruling in its favor which was not excepted to. The judgment is affirmed, with costs, as to the plaintiff’s cause of action, and reversed as to the defendant’s counterclaim, and a new trial granted upon that issue, costs to abide the final award of costs. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred. Judgment affirmed, with costs, as to the plaintiff’s cause of action, and reversed as to defendant’s counterclaim, and a new trial granted upon that issue, costs to abide the final award of costs.
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                        Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                          For the month of March 2004

                        Commission File Number: 0-30852

                         GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                          Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456
                         (1038) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X           Form 40-F
                                ---                    ---

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes              No  X
                                 ---             ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

Month Filed                    Event and Summary                     Exhibit No.

March 2004      Financial statements of the Registrant for the          99.1
                fiscal years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002


<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                              GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.
                                              (Registrant)

Date:  March 2, 2004                          By: /s/ Antonio Garces
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:   Antonio Garces
                                                 Title:  Chief Executive Officer
Final EIS Appendix 24 

APPENDIX 24—WILD AND SCENIC RIVER 

DESIGNATION PROCESS 

As part of the planning effort for developing the Pinedale Resource Management Plan (RMP), the Bureau 

of Land Management (BLM) initiated a Wild and Scenic Rivers (WSR) review of all BLM-administered 

public lands along waterways within the Pinedale planning area. This review was to determine whether 

any of these public lands meet the WSR eligibility criteria and suitability factors, as identified in the Wild 

and Scenic Rivers Act (WSRA) of 1968, as amended. 

The BLM WSR review includes a three-step process: 

1. Determining whether public lands along waterways meet the WSR eligibility criteria to be 

tentatively classified as wild, scenic, or recreational 

2. Determining whether any of those public lands that meet the eligibility criteria also meet the 

WSR suitability factors 

3. Determining how public lands, which are determined suitable for designation, will be managed. 

The initial WSR review was conducted separately from the RMP planning process to expedite the review 

process, resulting in a stand-alone WSR review report. Public comments concerning the determinations 

made in this review have been taken into consideration and documented in the RMP planning process. 

This WSR eligibility review may be modified if deemed necessary as a result of public comments. 

The Pinedale Wild and Scenic Rivers Review report may be viewed at www/blm.gov/rmp/wy/pinedale/ 

under “Documents and Bulletins.” 

Pinedale RMP A24-1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 102

 105

 105

 108

 107

 107

 114

 106

 102

 102

 105

 105

 117

 106

 97

 99

 99

 97

 93

 90

 90

 101

 92

 97

 97

 94

 89

 110

 97

 100

 94

 96

 95

 94

 97

 92

 100

 92

 89

 81

 96

 98

 101

 94

 95

 89

 90

 86

 80

 79

 82

 82

 81

 77

 77

 77

 80

 77

 81

 81

 99

 100

 102

 103

 103

 101

 107

 99

 97

 93

 99

 101

 105

 100

 96

 94

 94

 91

 87

 85

 86

 89

 86

 86

 85

 83

 84

 88

 89

 88

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 377 350 367

2 378 372 376

3 386 363 372

4 367 354 360

5 366 344 354

6 361 342 349

7 337 246 297

8 245 190 215

9 218 190 204

10 226 202 218

11 219 193 203

12 310 213 261

13 385 309 352

14 396 292 357

15 289 121 188

16 121 115 118

17 152 121 137

18 205 152 176

19 263 199 234

20 345 263 312

21 377 318 349

22 333 305 318

23 332 197 271

24 191 174 177

25 223 175 196

26 311 219 268

27 403 299 362

28 419 337 390

29 334 196 263

30 193 161 173

31 175 161 167

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Union Island On Old River At Middle River 

Period: October 2023 Run Date: 11/8/2023
#### § 2544.3 Notice to deposit purchase price.

If, upon consideration of the application, it shall be determined that the applicant is entitled to purchase the lands applied for, the applicant will be notified, by registered mail, that he must within 6 months from receipt of notice deposit the appraised price of the land or else forfeit all his rights under his application.
§ 725.404 Development of evidence—general. ( a ) *Employment history.* Each claimant shall furnish the district director with a complete and detailed history of the coal miner's employment and, upon request, supporting documentation.
( b ) *Matters of record.* Where it is necessary to obtain proof of age, marriage or termination of marriage, death, family relationship, dependency (see subpart B of this part), or any other fact which may be proven as a matter of public record, the claimant shall furnish such proof to the district director upon request.
( c ) *Documentary evidence.* If a claimant is required to submit documents to the district director, the claimant shall submit either the original, a certified copy or a clear readable copy thereof. The district director or administrative law judge may require the submission of an original document or certified copy thereof, if necessary.
( d ) *Submission of insufficient evidence.* In the event a claimant submits insufficient evidence regarding any matter, the district director shall inform the claimant of what further evidence is necessary and request that such evidence be submitted within a specified reasonable time which may, upon request, be extended for good cause.
Eddi e Baza Calvo Governor ofGuam 

## /

-- -.r 

## BUREAU OF



# =< **STATISTICS** & PLANS

Ray Tenorio Lieutenant Governor

Mr. Eugene Bromley SAGAN PLANU SIHA VAN EMFOTMAS ION Government of Guam P.O. Box 2950 Hagatffa, Guam 96932 Tel: (671) 472-4201/3 Fax: (671) 477-1812 

## JAN 1 0 2m4

NPDES Permits Office, Water Division USEPA, Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 Hafa Adai Mr. Bromley : Lorilee T. Crisostomo Director

The Bureau ' s Guam Coastal Management Program (GCMP) has reviewed the U.S. Environmental Protecti on Agency's (USEPA) consistency determination for the proposed issuance ofa Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) for storm water discharges from industrial facilities. We understand that when finalized , the proposed 2013 MSGP will replace the 2008 pennit that expired on September 29 , 2013. The proposed permit will include technology-base effluent limitations based upon the Clean Water Act and new requirements by USEPA ' s guidelines to reduce the amount ofsediment and other pollutants discharges from construction and development sites. It ensures that discharges will be in compliance with applicable Guam water quality standards subject tot he Guam Environmental Protection Agency (GEPA) certification and approval require ment. The General Construction Permit requires compliance with effluent limits and other permit requirements , such as the development ofthe Storm WaterPollution Protection Plan, necessary to implement the new Effluent Limitations Guidelines and new Source Performance Standards for Construction and Development. The USEPA has determined that the proposed permit is consistent to the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable policies of the GCMP. The Bureau defers the implementation ofthe new Construction General Permit decision to GEPA, cognizant ofits responsibilities mandated under the CWAcertification and approval requirements , on the basis of their expert and scientific knowledge ofthe issues and concerns in the approval ofthe MSGP/NPDES as proposed

. Therefore, we concur with US EPA ' s determination that the permit is consistent with the policies of the GCMP , in accordance with the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-583) , as amended (P.L. 93- 370). However, this GCMP Federal Consistency determination does not preclude the need to secure other Federal and Government ofGuam permits, clearances, and approvals. Si Yu'os Ma ' ase'.

cc: GEPA DOAg. DPR/HPO 

### DLM Sincerely,



### Director 

# ~

. CRISOSTOMO

Guam Coastal Management Program !.and l h c Planning Socio-l conomic Planning Planning lnlbnnation Business & Economic Statistics
### §4238. Monitoring of compliance

#### (a) Enforceable agreements

#### (1) In general

The Director, through binding contractual agreements with owners or other authorized entities, shall ensure long-term compliance with the provisions of this subchapter.

#### (2) Measures

The measures referred to in paragraph (1) shall provide for—

(A) to the extent allowable by Federal and State law, the enforcement of the provisions of this subchapter by the Department and the Secretary; and

(B) remedies for breach of the provisions referred to in paragraph (1).

#### (b) Periodic monitoring

#### (1) In general

Not less frequently than annually, the Director shall review the activities conducted and housing assisted under this subchapter to assess compliance with the requirements of this subchapter.

#### (2) Review

Each review under paragraph (1) shall include onsite inspection of housing to determine compliance with applicable requirements.

#### (3) Results

The results of each review under paragraph (1) shall be—

(A) included in a performance report of the Director submitted to the Secretary under section 4239 of this title; and

(B) made available to the public.

#### (c) Performance measures

The Secretary shall establish such performance measures as may be necessary to assess compliance with the requirements of this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 104–330, title VIII, §819, as added Pub. L. 106–568, title II, §203, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2893, and Pub. L. 106–569, title V, §513, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2987.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 106–568, §203, and Pub. L. 106–569, §513, enacted identical sections 819 of Pub. L. 104–330. This section is based on the text of section 819 of Pub. L. 104–330, as added by Pub. L. 106–569, §513.
Searched for **https://teens.drugabuse.gov/quiz/national-drug-alcohol-facts-week/take-iq-challenge/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://teens.drugabuse.gov/quiz/national-drug-alcohol-facts-week/take-iq-challenge/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
EXHIBIT 12 - COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                         Nine months ended
                                           September 30,                         Year Ended
                                      ---------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
                                         1998       1997      1997       1996       1995       1994       1993
                                        ------     ------     -----     ------     ------     ------     ------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>
Income before income
  taxes                                  93,756     64,556    104,077     71,240    49,817     36,396     15,696
Dividends and other received from
  nonconsolidated affiliates              1,807      2,236      4,624     10,430     1,432
                                       ---------  --------   -------    -------   --------   --------   --------
Total                                    95,563     66,792    108,701     81,670    51,249     36,396     15,696

            Fixed Charges
Interest expense                         94,555     51,804     75,076     30,080    20,752      7,669      5,390
Amortization of loan fees                 1,571      1,013      1,451        506     1,004         82          5
Interest portion of rentals               8,853      4,590      6,120        424       361        262        188
                                      ---------  --------- ----------  --------- ---------  ---------  ---------
Total fixed charges                     104,979     57,407     82,647     31,010    22,117      8,013      5,583

Preferred stock dividends
Tax effect of preferred dividends             0          0          0          0         0          0          0
After tax preferred dividends                 0          0          0          0         0          0          0
                                      ---------  --------- ----------  --------- ---------  ---------  ---------
Total fixed charges and
  preferred dividends                   104,979     57,407     82,647     31,010    22,117      8,013      5,583
                                      ---------  --------- ----------  --------- ---------  ---------  ---------
Total earnings available for
  payment of fixed charges              200,542    124,199    191,348    112,680    73,366     44,409     21,279
                                         ======      =====      =====      =====     =====      =====      =====
Ratio of earnings to fixed
  Charges                                  1.91       2.16       2.32       3.63      3.32       5.54       3.81
                                         ======      =====      =====      =====     =====      =====      =====

Rental fees and charges                 110,659     57,375     76,500      5,299     4,510      3,273      2,344
Interest rate                                8%         8%         8%         8%        8%         8%         8%



</TABLE>
Table 27
                                               U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                                      Central Valley Operations Office

                                                      Tehama-Colusa Canal
                                                             2001

Monthly Deliveries in AF

       Water Users           Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct  Nov  Dec   Total

Colusa County WD              454    193   1375   5618  10619  12764  12724   8144   3689   3735  220   90   59625
Cortina WD                      6      0     12     95    168    213    203    103     63     78    0    0     941
Davis WD                        0      0     28    212    308    336    564    274      0      0    0    0    1722
Dunnigan WD                    43      5     59    954   3058   2947   3336   2349    829    395    0    4   13979
4-M Water District              0      0     32    285    510    342    497    415    130    158    2    0    2371
Glenn Valley WD                 0      0      0      0    101    103     37    280     30      2    0    0     553
Glide WD                       16      0      1    318   3667   3058   3520   2469    375     66  271   27   13788
Holthouse WD                    0      0      0     95    452    405    344    155    227     51    0    0    1729
Kanawha WD                      0      6    291   2140   8565   8684   7452   4381   1028    277   13    0   32837
Kirkwood WD                     0      0      0     35    188    192    256    138     61     16    0    0     886
La Grande WD                    0      0      4    541   1377   1324   1228    847      0    147    0    0    5468
Myers-Marsh MWC                 0      0      0     21     22     61     47     50      0      0    0    0     201
Orland-Artois WD              226     17    193   2762   8426   8487   9231   7181   3629   1955   19   36   42162
Westside WD                    54      0    499   2671   8159   8839   6529   3563   1173    744    6    0   32237

Total                         799    221   2494  15747  45620  47755  45968  30349  11234   7624  531  157  208499