alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Donald C. BACHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J KUHN; et al., Defendants — Appellees.

No. 04-17499.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*246Donald Bachman, Corcoran, CA, pro se.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

California state prisoner Donald C. Bachman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he was assaulted by a correctional officer and that the prison disciplinary proceeding related to the incident was unfair. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo dismissal for failure to state a claim under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

Bachman’s due process claim challenged the propriety of a disciplinary proceeding that resulted in the loss of 360 days of good-time credit. The district court properly dismissed this claim because Bachman did not allege that this punishment had been invalidated. *See Edwards v. Balisok,*520 U.S. 641, 644, 646-48, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997) (holding that a due process claim challenging disciplinary proceeding that necessarily implies the invalidity of the deprivation of good-time credits is not cognizable under section 1983).

The district court erred by dismissing, on screening, Bachman’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claim as barred under *Heck v. Humphrey,*512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). *See Smith v. City of Hemet,*394 F.3d 689, 695-99 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc) (recognizing that a plaintiffs excessive force claim may not be barred by *Heck*where plaintiff has been convicted of resisting an officer). Accordingly, we vacate the order dismissing Bachman’s Eighth Amendment claim and remand for further proceedings on this claim.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appointment of counsel. *See Rand v. Rowland,*113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir.1997).

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
October 2021

STORAGE ACRE-FEET SAN LUIS RELEASE - C.F.S. GAIN(+) OR EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY

ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING 

C.F.S

POWER PACHECO

TUNNEL

SPILL LOSS(-) C.F.S. C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

251,184

1 360.57 246,750 -4,434 0 2,046 129 0 -60 62 0.32 0.00

2 359.84 242,407 -4,343 0 2,076 132 0 19 69 0.36 0.00

3 359.14 238,271 -4,136 0 2,056 123 0 94 59 0.31 0.00

4 358.85 236,566 -1,705 448 1,118 125 0 -64 53 0.28 0.00

5 358.64 235,334 -1,232 0 416 133 0 -72 82 0.43 0.00

6 358.47 234,339 -995 0 263 124 0 -115 79 0.42 0.00

7 357.86 230,782 -3,557 0 1,649 127 0 -17 47 0.25 0.00

8 357.22 227,073 -3,709 0 1,658 114 0 -98 56 0.30 0.03

9 356.73 224,250 -2,823 0 1,257 116 0 -49 60 0.32 0.00

10 356.62 223,618 -632 0 102 118 0 -98 50 0.27 0.00

11 356.22 221,327 -2,291 0 909 129 0 -117 33 0.18 0.00

12 355.97 219,900 -1,427 0 504 131 0 -84 92 0.50 0.00

13 355.50 217,227 -2,673 0 1,207 127 0 -14 92 0.50 0.00

14 355.28 215,980 -1,247 0 403 124 0 -101 27 0.15 0.00

15 354.94 214,059 -1,921 0 805 137 0 -26 47 0.26 0.00

16 354.34 210,687 -3,372 0 1,596 127 0 23 47 0.26 0.00

17 353.85 207,949 -2,738 0 1,188 127 0 -65 68 0.38 0.00

18 353.39 205,392 -2,557 0 1,219 121 0 50 45 0.25 0.00

19 352.93 202,848 -2,544 0 1,170 111 0 -1 34 0.19 0.00

20 352.23 199,002 -3,846 0 1,912 125 0 98 32 0.18 0.00

21 351.74 196,329 -2,673 0 1,271 109 0 33 37 0.21 0.00

22 351.04 192,536 -3,793 0 1,879 101 0 67 35 0.20 0.00

23 350.95 192,050 -486 0 0 88 0 -157 30 0.17 0.02

24 351.29 193,887 1,837 1,244 0 89 0 -229 31 0.18 0.00

25 351.96 197,527 3,640 1,822 0 101 0 115 26 0.15 0.81

26 353.68 207,002 9,475 5,010 0 79 0 -154 23 0.13 0.01

27 356.32 221,899 14,897 7,710 0 84 0 -115 17 0.09 0.00

28 359.17 238,448 16,549 8,820 0 93 0 -383 17 0.09 0.00

29 361.94 254,982 16,534 8,751 0 78 0 -337 20 0.10 0.00

30 364.57 271,078 16,096 8,670 0 76 0 -478 24 0.12 0.00

31 367.08 286,786 15,708 8,609 0 83 0 -606 31 0.15 0.00

TOTALS 35,602 51,084 26,704 3,481 0 -2,941 1,425 7.70 0.87

ACRE-FEET 35,602 101,321 52,974 6,902 0 -5,843 2,826

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 52,974 Spill 0

Pacheco Tunnel 6,902

Total 59,876

Precipitation

This month = 0.87

October 01, 2021 To date = 0.87

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 9/26/2023
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10546 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Josue Sanchez Garcia,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 10

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *

The attorney appointed to represent Josue Sanchez Garcia has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Sanchez Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 17, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10546 Document: 00516018013 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/17/2021No. 21

- 10546

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
wit hdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-10546 Document: 00516018013 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/17/2021
#### § 726.300 Purpose and scope.

Any operator which is required to secure the payment of benefits under section 423 of the Act and § 726.4 and which fails to secure such benefits, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $1,000, as adjusted by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended, for each day during which such failure occurs. If the operator is a corporation, the president, secretary, and treasurer of the operator shall also be severally liable for the penalty based on the operator's failure to secure the payment of benefits. This subpart defines those terms necessary for administration of the civil money penalty provisions, describes the criteria for determining the amount of penalty to be assessed, and sets forth applicable procedures for the assessment and contest of penalties.

[81 FR 43449, July 1, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      14,621,200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,117,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,719,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,366,000
<PP&E>                                      78,079,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,472,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              97,653,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,001,900
<BONDS>                                     29,940,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       410,300
<OTHER-SE>                                  90,756,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                97,653,100
<SALES>                                     13,108,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,108,400
<CGS>                                        8,395,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,395,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,510,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             540,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                294,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            294,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   294,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
#### Maurice Slater Trucking Company, Inc., Respondent, v. William Maus, Appellant.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Hefliernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 139.]
### §1780n. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–286, §16, Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1229, which provided that this subchapter would take effect on Sept. 27, 2006, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities
                    Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

                     -------------------------------------

In connection with the amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of ELECTRONIC
SENSOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Report"), I, Francis Chang, Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President of Finance
and Administration, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: September  26, 2006
                                         /s/ Francis Chang
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Francis Chang
                                         Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President
                                         of Finance and Administration
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERREQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Russ Berrieand Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Gatto, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | November 9, 2007                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                                     |
|   | /s/ Andrew Gatto                         |
|   | Andrew Gatto                             |
|   | *President  and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. andwill be retained by Russ Berrie and Company, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

----
#### Helen Veivia, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Iowa First  Bancshares  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, D.
Scott Ingstad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ D. Scott Ingstad
----------------------
D. Scott Ingstad
Chairman of the Board,
President and CEO


May 16, 2005

                                       1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 834.10

 834.30

 834.47

 834.74

 835.08

 835.35

 836.03

 836.30

 836.23

 836.06

 835.88

 836.23

 836.48

 836.86

 837.47

 838.49

 838.78

 837.98

 837.98

 839.00

 837.20

 836.26

 836.53

 837.16

 837.30

 836.70

 837.02

 837.36

 837.46

 837.76

 838.16

 41.86

 42.10

 42.30

 42.61

 43.02

 43.34

 44.16

 44.49

 44.40

 44.19

 43.98

 44.40

 44.70

 45.17

 45.92

 47.18

 47.55

 46.55

 46.55

 47.82

 45.58

 44.44

 44.76

 45.53

 45.70

 44.97

 45.36

 45.78

 45.90

 46.27

 46.77

STORAGE

+0.22

+0.24

+0.20

+0.32

+0.40

+0.32

+0.82

+0.33

-0.09

-0.21

-0.22

+0.42

+0.30

+0.46

+0.75

+1.27

+0.36

-1.00

+0.00

+1.28

-2.24

-1.15

+0.33

+0.77

+0.17

-0.74

+0.39

+0.42

+0.12

+0.37

+0.50

CHANGE

305

316

709

636

568

528

776

808

637

576

574

574

513

594

736

1,153

1,511

1,221

1,555

2,766

3,348

1,564

1,343

2,936

3,476

2,119

1,777

1,459

1,260

1,124

1,244

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 618

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 39

 695

 1,098

 920

 1,440

 3,849

 1,511

 548

 1,916

 2,745

 1,847

 937

 607

 554

 294

 348

SPILL

 171

 171

 586

 452

 342

 342

 342

 20

 657

 657

 657

 337

 337

 337

 335

 472

 626

 626

 628

 682

 628

 628

 628

 628

 639

 639

 639

 639

 639

 639

 639

OUTLET

 2

 6

 2

 4

 3

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 6

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 7

 2

 7

 0

 0

 3

 2

 5

 5

 4

 4

 2

 4

 4

 6

C.F.S.

 .06

 .17

 .06

 .10

 .08

 .07

 .08

 .10

 .08

 .09

 .15

 .09

 .09

 .10

 .07

 .07

 .18

 .06

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .06

 .12

 .12

 .11

 .11

 .05

 .09

 .11

 .16

INCHES

 .00

 .51

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .21

 .00

 .10

 .35

 1.88

 .16

 .00

 1.08

 .21

 1.10

 .04

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 RUN DATE: 04/01/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +5.11 38,706 15,762 20,246 110 2.89 6.09

ACRE-FEET +5,110 76,773 31,264 40,158 218

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 40,158

OUTLET

TOTAL

 31,264

 71,422

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.09

JULY 1, 2010 20.15

 41.64

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Keith Kennedy, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/    KEITH KENNEDYName:Keith KennedyTitle:Chief Financial OfficerDateMarch 5, 2013
**Exhibit      32.2**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                            |                                                                                                    |                                |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Date:                        September 14, 2007 |                                                                                                    | /s/                      James Doss |
|                                            | James                      DossActing                      Chief Financial                      Officer |

----
### §132. Mode of distribution of goods

Whenever goods and merchandise are delivered to the chiefs of a tribe, for the tribe, such goods and merchandise shall be turned over by the agent or superintendent of such tribe to the chiefs in bulk, and in the original package, as nearly as practicable, and in the presence of the headmen of the tribe, if practicable, to be distributed to the tribe by the chiefs in such manner as the chiefs may deem best, in the presence of the agent or superintendent.

(R.S. §2090.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2090 derived from act Apr. 10, 1869, ch. 16, §2, 16 Stat. 39.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with. See note set out under section 64 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 826.80

 826.82

 826.83

 826.85

 826.86

 826.87

 827.03

 828.05

 831.00

 830.07

 830.11

 829.76

 829.43

 829.04

 828.59

 828.76

 828.90

 829.03

 829.14

 829.24

 829.34

 829.43

 829.51

 829.57

 829.64

 829.70

 830.00

 832.64

 831.98

 831.62

 831.12

 33.79

 33.81

 33.82

 33.84

 33.85

 33.86

 34.02

 35.10

 38.31

 37.28

 37.33

 36.94

 36.58

 36.16

 35.68

 35.86

 36.01

 36.15

 36.27

 36.38

 36.49

 36.58

 36.67

 36.74

 36.81

 36.88

 37.20

 40.17

 39.41

 39.01

 38.45

STORAGE

+0.02

+0.02

+0.01

+0.02

+0.01

+0.01

+0.17

+1.07

+3.21

-1.03

+0.05

-0.38

-0.36

-0.42

-0.48

+0.18

+0.15

+0.14

+0.12

+0.11

+0.11

+0.10

+0.09

+0.07

+0.08

+0.07

+0.33

+2.96

-0.75

-0.41

-0.56

CHANGE

31

33

28

32

27

27

114

565

2,193

150

692

196

163

128

99

124

97

92

80

76

77

72

67

55

59

53

185

3,519

3,220

2,003

1,579

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 1,417

 2,945

 1,547

 1,210

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 552

 648

 648

 369

 323

 322

 322

 11

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 608

 655

 654

 652

OUTLET

 1

 2

 3

 1

 1

 1

 10

 4

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 3

 3

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 1

C.F.S.

 .03

 .06

 .08

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .29

 .13

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .05

 .09

 .10

 .07

 .04

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.09

 .79

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.40

 2.28

 .78

 .85

 .10

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

DECEMBER 2004 RUN DATE: 07/21/2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4.71 15,836 5,765 7,659 50 1.46 7.54

ACRE-FEET +4,710 31,411 11,435 15,192 99

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 15,192

OUTLET

TOTAL

 11,435

 26,627

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 7.54

JULY 1, 2004 13.28

 33.77

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### §1300i–6. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–580, §7, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2931, which related to division of remaining funds after Settlement Fund payments have been made, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.