alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,368.36

 2,368.48

 2,368.54

 2,368.57

 2,368.63

 2,368.69

 2,368.69

 2,368.63

 2,368.55

 2,368.40

 2,368.26

 2,368.03

 2,367.85

 2,367.69

 2,367.54

 2,367.44

 2,367.33

 2,367.22

 2,367.13

 2,367.05

 2,366.95

 2,366.88

 2,366.81

 2,366.70

 2,366.51

 2,366.33

 2,366.20

 2,366.05

 2,365.92

 2,365.82

 2,365.70

 2,420.7

 2,422.6

 2,423.6

 2,424.1

 2,425.1

 2,426.1

 2,426.1

 2,425.1

 2,423.8

 2,421.3

 2,419.0

 2,415.3

 2,412.3

 2,409.7

 2,407.3

 2,405.7

 2,403.9

 2,402.1

 2,400.6

 2,399.3

 2,397.7

 2,396.5

 2,395.4

 2,393.6

 2,390.5

 2,387.6

 2,385.5

 2,383.1

 2,381.0

 2,379.4

 2,377.5

STORAGE

+1.3

+2.0

+1.0

+0.5

+1.0

+1.0

+0.0

-1.0

-1.3

-2.5

-2.3

-3.8

-2.9

-2.6

-2.4

-1.6

-1.8

-1.8

-1.5

-1.3

-1.6

-1.1

-1.1

-1.8

-3.1

-2.9

-2.1

-2.4

-2.1

-1.6

-1.9

CHANGE

4,335

4,342

4,077

3,885

3,976

3,766

3,380

2,893

2,572

1,977

2,059

1,554

1,684

1,674

1,476

1,721

1,442

1,421

1,514

1,584

1,408

1,546

1,425

1,376

833

956

1,169

1,172

1,268

1,026

867

INFLOW

 3,563

 3,244

 3,436

 3,492

 3,355

 3,111

 3,226

 3,225

 3,112

 3,053

 3,062

 3,316

 3,063

 2,887

 2,580

 2,408

 2,222

 2,204

 1,913

 2,136

 2,112

 1,984

 1,892

 2,107

 2,242

 2,307

 2,117

 2,273

 2,184

 1,700

 1,675

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 288

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 111

 106

 145

 145

 125

 159

 154

 164

 121

 164

 154

 139

 101

 101

 129

 134

 124

 120

 53

 105

 115

 134

 105

 167

 143

 119

 114

 124

 142

 138

 166

C.F.S.

 .23

 .22

 .30

 .30

 .26

 .33

 .32

 .34

 .25

 .34

 .32

 .29

 .21

 .21

 .27

 .28

 .26

 .25

 .11

 .22

 .24

 .28

 .22

 .35

 .30

 .25

 .24

 .26

 .30

 .29

 .35

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -41.7 64,378 81,201 0 288 4,021 8.39 .09

ACRE-FEET -41,700 127,694 161,062 0 571 7,976

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 161,062

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 571

 161,633

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .09

JULY 1, 2011 .09

 2,419.4

(1) (1)
Exhibit 14

                                 Code of Ethics
                                       for
          The Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officers

                                                                  March 11, 2003

This Code of Ethics for the Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Principal  Financial
Officers  (this  "Code of Ethics")  governs  the conduct of the Chief  Executive
Officer,  Chief Financial Officer, and Controller of Kerr-McGee Corporation (the
"Company").  This Code of Ethics  supplements--but does not replace--the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics applicable to all employees, officers, and directors
and is designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote ethical and legal behavior by
the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller.

Each of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller are
responsible for:

          o Acting with honesty and integrity,  and avoiding  actual or apparent
            conflicts   of  interest   involving   personal   and   professional
            relationships, as described in the Company's Code of Conduct;

          o Disclosing  to the  general  counsel  any  material  transaction  or
            relationship  that reasonably could be expected to give rise to such
            a conflict;

          o Ensuring  that the  Company's  disclosure  controls  and  procedures
            function properly and providing officials of the Company information
            that is full,  fair,  accurate,  complete,  objective,  timely,  and
            understandable  for  inclusion in filings the Company makes with the
            Securities   and   Exchange   Commission   and   in   other   public
            communications made by the Company;

          o Complying with laws, rules, and regulations of all U.S. and non-U.S.
            governmental   entities,   as  well  as  other  private  and  public
            regulatory agencies to which the Company is subject; and

          o Reporting  to the  general  counsel any  violations  of this Code of
            Ethics of which each such person is aware.

The waiver of any duty or  responsibility  set forth in this Code of Ethics must
be made by the Board of  Directors  of the  Company  and will be  reported  in a
public filing with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  within two business
days after such waiver is granted.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This is to  acknowledge  receipt of the Code of Ethics  for the Chief  Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officers. I understand that failure to adhere to
the principles and  responsibilities set forth in this Code of Ethics may result
in disciplinary action,  including reprimand,  warnings,  suspension,  demotion,
salary  reduction,  restitution  and/or  discharge,  as well as  possible  legal
penalties.

Name (please print) __________________________

Signature __________________________________

Date ______________________________________
1

This section of the Rules of Criminal Procedure provides for an appeal, after a guilty plea, of a

certified question of law.

FILED

September 10, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

MAY 1997 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) C.C.A. NO. 02C01-9603-CR-00083

Appellee, )

) SHELBY COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. JAMES C. BEASLEY, JR.,

CLEOPHES CARTER, ) JUDGE

)

Appellant. ) (Certified Question of Law)

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur fully in the results reached by the author in his opinion. However,

I concur in results only because of the defendant’s failure to comply with the guidelines

set out in State v. Preston, 759 S.W.2d 647 (Tenn. 1988), and reaffirmed in State v.

Pendergrass, 937 S.W.2d 834 (Tenn. 1996). I note that the defendant was represented

by counsel at the time his plea was entered, and the trial court expressly advised the

defendant “if you decide you want to appeal your matter: you have a right to do so under

the guidelines of 37(b)(i).” This advice by the trial judge was after the defendant had

previously indicated his desire to appeal the search issue and his desire to represent

himself. The transcript also indicates that the defendant had entered, on the guilty plea

form, “37(b)(2)(i).”1

The defendant was represented by counsel at the time he entered his plea

but chose to represent himself on appeal. There is no order in the record indicating that
2

a certified question was reserved at the time of his plea, even though this matter was

discussed and the trial judge advised the defendant it would have to be done timely and

properly. For this reason, I would dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with the

requirements of Preston.

______________________________

JOHN H. PEAY, Judge
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       16
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549
                             ----------------------

                                    FORM 6-K

                        REPORT of Foreign Private Issuer

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of: May 2002

                               Given Imaging Ltd.
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

                    2 Ha'Carmel Street, Yoqneam 20692, Israel
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F X       Form 40-F
                                    ---               ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                               Yes           No X
                                  ---          ---
<PAGE>

                               Given Imaging Ltd.

The following exhibit is filed as part of this Form 6-K:

Exhibit        Description

A.             Press release dated May 16, 2002, entitled "Given Imaging
               Announces Results of 2001 Annual Shareholders Meeting."
<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                              GIVEN IMAGING LTD.

Date:    May 21, 2002                         By:  /s/ Zvi Ben David
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:   Zvi Ben David
                                                 Title:  Vice President and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fidel PAREDES-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41416.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 3, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mitchel Neurock, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Fidel Paredes-Chavez (Paredes) appeals from his sentence imposed pursuant to his guilty plea to illegal reentry after deportation. Paredes contends that his sentence is unconstitutional under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), because he was sen-*853fenced pursuant to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime.

The district court stated, however, that if the Guidelines had not applied, the court would have imposed the same sentence that Paredes received. Therefore, the Government has carried its burden of establishing that the sentencing error in Paredes’s case was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *See United States v. Garza,*429 F.3d 165, 170 (5th Cir.2005); *United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 464-66 (5th Cir.2005).

Paredes also challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Paredes contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Paredes properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4634 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, unique 

ZIP Code for Eastvale, California. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2016 

Mr. CALVERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a 

single, unique ZIP Code for Eastvale, California. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR EASTVALE, 

4 CALIFORNIA. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this section, the United States Postal Service shall 

7 designate a single, unique ZIP Code applicable to the area 

8 encompassing only Eastvale, California. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,307.58

 2,307.25

 2,306.88

 2,306.54

 2,306.25

 2,305.96

 2,305.65

 2,305.33

 2,305.04

 2,304.70

 2,304.39

 2,304.06

 2,303.76

 2,303.45

 2,303.14

 2,302.79

 2,302.47

 2,302.19

 2,301.92

 2,301.61

 2,301.29

 2,301.18

 2,301.26

 2,302.07

 2,302.17

 2,302.11

 2,302.08

 2,302.24

 2,302.43

 2,302.48

 2,302.72

 1,553.6

 1,549.6

 1,545.0

 1,540.9

 1,537.3

 1,533.8

 1,530.0

 1,526.1

 1,522.6

 1,518.5

 1,514.7

 1,510.7

 1,507.1

 1,503.4

 1,499.6

 1,495.4

 1,491.6

 1,488.2

 1,485.0

 1,481.3

 1,477.5

 1,476.2

 1,477.1

 1,486.8

 1,488.0

 1,487.3

 1,486.9

 1,488.8

 1,491.1

 1,491.7

 1,494.6

STORAGE

-4.1

-4.1

-4.5

-4.2

-3.5

-3.5

-3.8

-3.9

-3.5

-4.1

-3.8

-4.0

-3.6

-3.7

-3.7

-4.2

-3.8

-3.4

-3.2

-3.7

-3.8

-1.3

+1.0

+9.7

+1.2

-0.7

-0.4

+1.9

+2.3

+0.6

+2.9

CHANGE

235

250

-55

158

27

106

148

136

254

201

293

73

149

175

143

57

-1

205

222

95

6

132

1,427

5,702

1,396

716

730

1,813

1,994

1,169

1,804

INFLOW

 2,204

 2,213

 2,181

 2,194

 1,762

 1,846

 2,000

 2,071

 1,990

 2,239

 2,110

 2,035

 1,930

 2,012

 2,005

 2,148

 1,918

 1,841

 1,812

 1,919

 1,894

 765

 928

 831

 792

 1,078

 855

 833

 832

 856

 354

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 76

 83

 54

 61

 54

 47

 50

 29

 43

 39

 75

 53

 43

 46

 21

 28

 14

 56

 39

 39

 35

 28

 18

 0

 0

 0

 56

 14

 14

 11

 0

C.F.S.

 .21

 .23

 .15

 .17

 .15

 .13

 .14

 .08

 .12

 .11

 .21

 .15

 .12

 .13

 .06

 .08

 .04

 .16

 .11

 .11

 .10

 .08

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .71

 3.20

 1.16

 .08

 .00

 .65

 .62

 .02

 .12

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 15, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -62.9 19,760 50,448 0 0 1,126 3.16 6.67

ACRE-FEET -62,900 39,194 100,064 0 0 2,233

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 100,064

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 100,064

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.67

JULY 1, 2010 7.62

 1,557.7

(1) (1)
(No. 4161

#### Lucy M. O’Donnell, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 23, 1949.*

Lucy M. O’Donnell, Claimant, pro se.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; William J. Colohan, Assistant Attorney General, for Eespondent.

Lansden, J.

Claimant, Lucy M. 0 ’Donnell, seeks to recover under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for 8-2/7 weeks of temporary total disability as a result of a fall on ice in the performance of her duties as a child welfare worker in the Department of Public Welfare, Division of Child Welfare.

*28
      *On*the day the accident occurred, claimant was investigating at various homes cases assigned to her, and there can be no question from the record but that her injuries to her back resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment. Because of a pre-existing arthritis, claimant during the winter of 1948 did not respond to- the treatment of her attending physician, Dr. William E. Guinea, who recommended to her that she go to Florida to obtain the benefits of warmth and sunshine. This claimant did, and it is for the period of time that she was absent from her employment, on her doctor’s recommendation, that she seeks recovery for temporary total disability.

Claimant was paid her full rate of pay for two weeks ’ vacation and sick leave, and strictly speaking, she might be entitled to a greater allowance for temporary total disability than she claims in her complaint, but she testified directly at the hearing before Commissioner Young that all she was claiming was 8-2/7 weeks of temporary total disability compensation. Under such circumstances, we do not feel free to enlarge her recovery.

The evidence also shows that claimant paid Dr. Guinea the sum of $75.00 for his professional services and expended the further sum of $50.00 for drugs prescribed in the course of her treatment. Such expenditures were reasonable and claimant is entitled to recovery for them.

A. M. Rothbart, 120 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois, was employed to take and transcribe the evidence before Commissioner Young. Charges in the amount of $45.30 were incurred for such services, which charges are fair, reasonable and customary. An award is therefore entered in favor of A. M. Rothbart for such sum.

Claimant’s rate of pay was such as to entitle her to *29the maximum amount per week under the Workmen’s Compensation -Act, and she had no persons dependent upon her for support.

An award is entered in favor of claimant, Lucy M. O’Donnell in the sum of $286.57, all of which is accrued and payable forthwith, and is made up as follows:

> 8 2/7 weeks at $19.50 per week, or $161.57 and a further sum of $125.00 for doctor’s professional services and drugs.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees. ’ ’
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 117

 122

 125

 119

 119

 124

 123

 132

 121

 118

 118

 119

 121

 115

 127

 130

 123

 126

 138

 141

 133

 130

 132

 148

 137

 134

 142

 124

 141

 158

 156

 108

 108

 95

 104

 105

 104

 101

 92

 103

 102

 105

 105

 105

 105

 107

 112

 114

 117

 116

 118

 117

 121

 124

 127

 127

 127

 117

 108

 125

 141

 145

 112

 114

 110

 109

 109

 111

 108

 109

 112

 111

 112

 113

 111

 111

 114

 118

 118

 122

 124

 126

 123

 126

 129

 133

 132

 130

 133

 114

 136

 148

 149

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul G. Laird,
Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer and Treasurer,  of New Frontier Energy,  Inc.
(the "Company") certify that:

1.    
          I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 of New Frontier Energy, Inc.;

2.    
          Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement
          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
          statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
          made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
          and

3.    
          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information
          included in this annual report fairly present in all material respects the
          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of,
          and for, the period presented in this annual report.



|                         |                                                                                                            
|------------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         |                                                                                                            
|Date: September 24, 2009 | /s/ Paul G. Laird                                                                                          
|                         | Paul G. Laird,
Chief Executive Officer, President, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer
|                         |                                                                                                            
|                         |                                                                                                            
|                         |                                                                                                            
|                         |                                                                                                            

---
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### §§ 17.531-17.539 [Reserved]