alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 797.64

 797.66

 797.64

 797.65

 797.67

 797.67

 797.67

 797.68

 797.68

 797.68

 797.70

 797.70

 796.51

 795.20

 793.91

 792.52

 791.15

 790.83

 790.91

 791.00

 791.06

 791.26

 791.43

 791.95

 792.87

 793.25

 793.47

 793.73

 794.27

 796.95

 11.06

 11.07

 11.06

 11.06

 11.07

 11.07

 11.07

 11.08

 11.08

 11.08

 11.09

 11.09

 10.47

 9.81

 9.19

 8.55

 7.96

 7.82

 7.85

 7.89

 7.92

 8.00

 8.08

 8.30

 8.71

 8.88

 8.98

 9.11

 9.36

 10.70

STORAGE

+0.02

+0.01

-0.01

+0.01

+0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

-0.62

-0.66

-0.62

-0.64

-0.60

-0.14

+0.03

+0.04

+0.03

+0.08

+0.07

+0.23

+0.41

+0.17

+0.10

+0.12

+0.26

+1.34

CHANGE

40

37

27

35

38

32

32

36

33

32

37

33

-15

-39

-49

-34

-29

7

35

37

30

58

53

129

223

102

65

76

144

688

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 298

 292

 263

 287

 270

 74

 17

 17

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 14

 14

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 1

 3

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .13

 .10

 .10

 .14

 .14

 .12

 .12

 .15

 .15

 .09

 .08

 .15

 .08

 .05

 .07

 .02

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .05

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .40

 .13

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 1.16

 1.02

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 RUN DATE: 12/07/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.34 1,893 2,031 0 35 2.11 3.10

ACRE-FEET -340 3,755 4,028 0 69

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 4,028

 4,028

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.10

JULY 1, 2018 4.18

 11.04

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 4.18
### §288k. Extension of certain privileges, exemptions, and immunities to Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices

#### (a) Application of International Organizations Immunities Act

The provisions of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288 et seq.) may be extended to the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices in the same manner, to the same extent, and subject to the same conditions as such provisions may be extended to a public international organization in which the United States participates pursuant to any treaty or under the authority of any Act of Congress authorizing such participation or making an appropriation for such participation.

#### (b) Application of international agreement on certain State and local taxation

The President is authorized to apply the provisions of Article I of the Agreement on State and Local Taxation of Foreign Employees of Public International Organizations, done at Washington on April 21, 1994, to the Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices.

#### (c) "Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices" defined

The term "Hong Kong Economic and Trade Offices" refers to Hong Kong's official economic and trade missions in the United States.

(Pub. L. 105–22, §1, June 27, 1997, 111 Stat. 236.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The International Organizations Immunities Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is title I of act Dec. 29, 1945, ch. 652, 59 Stat. 669, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 288 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the International Organizations Immunities Act which comprises this subchapter.
#### In the Matter of Bernard K. Karliner, an Attorney.

*Attorney censured.*

Charges of professional misconduct against the respondent, an attorney and counselor at law, by the Association of the Bar of the City of Hew York.

Ingraham, P. J.:

The respondent was charged by the Association of the Bar with having received various small sums of money in settlement of claims placed in his hands and having appropriated the money to his own uses. In one case he gave to his client a check for the amount due, which check was returned by the bank upon which it was drawn on the ground that the drawer’s account was not good for the amount. In other *882cases it appeared, that the respondent had failed for a considerable time to account to his clients for money which he had received for them. The official referee has reported that these accounts had been made good by the attorney before this proceeding was commenced and that the misconduct which was proved was caused by the youth and inexperience of the respondent. The evidence seems to justify a finding that the money belonging to Ms clients was appropriated to his own uses and, while he subsequently made it good, that is really no excuse for the appropriation of his clients’ money by the respondent. The respondent should be censured for this breach of trust. The money was not his but belonged to his clients and it was a breach of trust for the respondent to use it. It was his duty to hold it as a strictly trust fund as Ms clients’ money, and for that the court must hold him guilty of professional misconduct for which he is censured. But in view of the finding of the official referee, the court will impose no further discipline. McLaughlin, LaugMin, Clarke and Scott, JJ., concurred. Respondent censured. Order to be settled on notice.
EXHIBIT 27.1 - FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE


FISCAL-YEAR-END                                    DEC-31-2000
PERIOD-END                                        JUNE-30-2000
CASH                                                  56893373
SECURITIES                                                   0
RECEIVABLES                                          881097208
ALLOWANCES                                            36731242
INVENTORY                                                    0
CURRENT-ASSETS                                      1044572020
PP&E                                                3339066318
DEPRECEATION                                         602176566
TOTAL-ASSETS                                       17648060533
CURRENT-LIABILITIES                                  691564293
BONDS                                               3176233000
PREFERRED-MANDATORY                                          0
PREFERRED                                                    0
COMMON                                                33897441
OTHER-SE                                           10066411598
TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY                         17648060533
SALES                                                        0
TOTAL-REVENUES                                      1750017386
CGS                                                          0
TOTAL-COSTS                                         1082689923
OTHER-EXPENSES                                       499561819
LOSS-PROVISION                                               0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                                     125459904
INCOME-PRETAX                                         40702383
INCOME-TAX                                            58472494
INCOME-CONTINUING                                     -8167285
DISCONTINUED                                                 0
EXTRAORDINARY                                                0
CHANGES                                                      0
NET-INCOME                                            -8167285
EPS-BASIC                                                  .09
EPS-DILUTED                                                .09
#### Elsie Woebse, Respondent, v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, Appellant.

Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Callahan, J., dissents and votes to affirm.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 662

 621

 634

 642

 633

 647

 646

 641

 683

 679

 659

 640

 647

 645

 668

 666

 667

 616

 619

 624

 649

 636

 681

 690

 726

 705

 682

 695

 738

 748

 586

 592

 597

 588

 577

 618

 601

 601

 612

 613

 620

 578

 609

 605

 627

 648

 602

 592

 589

 543

 620

 584

 625

 646

 647

 652

 648

 676

 675

 700

 627

 608

 617

 618

 603

 631

 632

 626

 642

 655

 642

 599

 637

 627

 654

 661

 637

 605

 607

 591

 632

 615

 660

 676

 681

 670

 663

 685

 719

 734

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
### §2502a. Retrocession or re-assumption of Indian education funds

Beginning July 1, 2008, and thereafter, any funds (including investments and interest earned, except for construction funds) held by a Public Law 100–297 grant or a Public Law 93–638 contract school shall, upon retrocession to or re-assumption by the Bureau of Indian Education, remain available to the Bureau of Indian Education for a period of 5 years from the date of retrocession or re-assumption for the benefit of the programs approved for the school on October 1, 1995.

(Pub. L. 113–76, div. G, title I, §110, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 312.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Public Law 100–297, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 100–297, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 130. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1988 Amendments note set out under section 6301 of Title 20, Education, and Tables.

Public Law 93–638, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2203, which is classified principally to chapter 46 (§5301 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2014, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014, and not as part of the Tribally Controlled Schools Act of 1988 which comprises this chapter.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. SCHUSTER, Appellant.

(216 N. W. 948.)

(File No. 6512.

Opinion filed December 31, 1927.)

*Otto L. Kaais,*of Britton, for Appellant.

*Buell P. Jones,*Attorney General, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

In the above-entitled cause, appeal is sought to be taken from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. Certified copy of notice of appeal was filed in this court on ■May 9, 1927, and the original notice of appeal on June 4, 1927. 'There has been no extension of time, and no brief has been filed by appellant. Therefore, pursuant to rule 5 of this court, the appeal will be deemed abandoned, and the order appealed from is affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 647

 681

 696

 715

 727

 745

 746

 765

 773

 791

 777

 782

 801

 798

 787

 766

 755

 720

 716

 715

 727

 721

 716

 709

 720

 735

 760

 788

 787

 781

 559

 609

 630

 685

 694

 697

 737

 728

 711

 699

 736

 734

 695

 735

 699

 720

 698

 671

 685

 706

 668

 703

 675

 643

 685

 710

 721

 733

 740

 745

 617

 662

 685

 705

 714

 726

 742

 751

 757

 768

 766

 775

 783

 772

 759

 755

 734

 707

 708

 711

 714

 716

 705

 699

 712

 727

 750

 774

 777

 770

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 2640.0-7 Cross reference.

The regulations of the Federal Aviation Administration under the Act are found in 14 CFR part 153.
**Exhibit 10.2.1**
**APPENDIX D**
**Section 6.7(a)(i) — List of Investment Funds Available Under the Plan**
D.1  The following Investment Funds are presently available under the Plan: 1. Balanced I Fund — Wellington 2. Guaranteed Income Fund 3. Invesco Dynamics Account 4. Janus Advisor Balanced Account 5. Janus Worldwide Account 6. Kaydon Corporation Stock (the “Stock Account”) 7. Large Cap Growth/Goldman Sachs Fund 8. Large Cap Value/John A. Levin & Co. Fund 9. Mid Cap Growth/Artisan Partners 10. Mid Cap Value Fund — Wellington 11. Retirement 2010 Fund 12. Retirement 2020 Fund 13. Retirement 2030 Fund 14. Retirement 2040 Fund 15. Retirement Goal Income Fund 16. Small Cap Growth/TimesSquare Fund 17. Small Cap Value/TCW Fund 18. Templeton Foreign Account 19. TimesSquare High Grade Bond Fund
 

 

     Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, no funds may betransferred from any other Fund into the CIGNA Guaranteed Short Term Accountand no funds may be transferred from to CIGNA Guaranteed Short Term Account inthe CIGNA Actively Managed Fixed Fund without first having been transferredinto one or more other Funds for at least ninety (90 days.
D.2 The Parkstone Intermediate Government Obligations Fund (the “GovernmentObligations Fund”) was previously available, but was not available foradditional allocations after December 31, 1993. That Investment Fund wasavailable for additional allocations until December 31, 1993 and continuedto be available for existing allocations to the Option on December 31,1993 until March 31, 1994.
§ 672.525 How are the costs associated with real property treated in the YouthBuild program? ( a ) As provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the costs of the following activities associated with real property are allowable solely for the purpose of training YouthBuild participants: ( 1 ) Rehabilitation of existing structures for use by homeless individuals and families or low-income families or for use as transitional housing.
( 2 ) Construction of buildings for use by homeless individuals and families or low-income families or for use as transitional housing.
( 3 ) Construction or rehabilitation of community or other public facilities, except, as provided in § 672.510(b), only 10 percent of the grant award is allowable for such construction and rehabilitation.
( b ) The costs for acquisition of buildings that are used for activities described in paragraph (a) of this section are allowable with prior grant officer approval and only under the following conditions: ( 1 ) The purchase cost of buildings used solely for training purposes is allowable; and
( 2 ) For buildings used for training and other purposes, the allowable amount is determined based on the proportionate share of the purchase cost related to direct training.
( c ) The following costs are allowable to the extent allocable to training YouthBuild participants in the construction and rehabilitation activities specified in paragraph (a) of this section: ( 1 ) Trainees' tools and clothing including personal protective equipment (PPE);
( 2 ) On-site trainee supervisors;
( 3 ) Construction management;
( 4 ) Relocation of buildings; and
( 5 ) Clearance and demolition.
( d ) Architectural fees, or a proportionate share thereof, are allowable when such fees can be related to items such as architectural plans or blueprints on which participants will be trained.
( e ) The following costs are unallowable: ( 1 ) The costs of acquisition of land.
( 2 ) Brokerage fees.
February 2024

STORAGE COMPUTED* NEW

ACRE-FEET INFLOW MELONES RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S.

34,333

1 477.87 35,194 861 1,925 1,781 1,490 0 0 1

2 477.88 35,202 8 1,495 1,324 1,491 0 0 0

3 477.79 35,134 -68 1,457 1,349 1,491 0 0 0

4 479.52 36,461 1,327 2,161 1,870 1,056 0 436 0

5 477.79 35,134 -1,327 816 657 388 0 1,097 0

6 477.00 34,540 -594 1,192 1,123 1,491 0 0 0

7 480.26 37,038 2,498 2,751 2,255 1,492 0 0 0

8 485.08 40,987 3,949 3,483 3,140 1,492 0 0 0

9 485.58 41,416 429 1,709 1,536 1,492 0 0 1

10 485.68 41,501 85 1,537 1,444 1,493 0 0 1

11 485.54 41,381 -120 1,434 1,362 1,492 0 0 2

12 485.51 41,356 -25 1,510 1,425 436 1,085 0 2

13 486.07 41,837 481 1,817 1,741 0 1,572 0 2

14 486.89 42,550 713 1,891 1,771 435 1,064 31 2

15 489.14 44,556 2,006 2,502 2,297 1,491 0 0 0

16 489.59 44,965 409 1,698 1,600 1,492 0 0 0

17 489.51 44,893 -72 1,457 1,383 1,492 0 0 1

18 489.49 44,874 -19 1,485 1,387 1,494 0 0 1

19 491.54 46,773 1,899 2,453 1,383 1,494 0 0 2

20 492.38 47,570 797 1,893 1,392 1,489 0 0 2

21 492.21 47,407 -163 1,409 1,030 1,490 0 0 1

22 493.38 48,533 1,126 2,059 1,906 1,489 0 0 2

23 493.75 48,893 360 1,667 1,533 1,484 0 0 2

24 493.23 48,387 -506 1,228 1,115 1,480 0 0 3

25 493.45 48,601 214 1,180 1,093 1,066 0 0 6

26 492.89 48,058 -543 1,594 1,561 1,827 0 38 3

27 494.25 49,383 1,325 2,329 2,299 1,655 0 4 2

28 496.11 51,241 1,858 1,905 1,857 966 0 0 2

29 497.12 52,273 1,032 1,491 1,402 967 0 0 4

TOTALS 17,940 51,528 46,016 37,115 3,721 1,606 42

ACRE-FEET 17,940 102,206 91,273 73,618 7,381 3,186 83

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

** EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 73,618 Outlet 3,186

Spill 7,381 Total 84,184

Historical Archive and Report Database

Tulloch Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/10/2024
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jaime Sequeda MORTERA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40364.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

*204James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jaime Sequeda Mortera pleaded guilty to being illegally present in the United States after deportation following an aggravated felony conviction. He was sentenced to a 21-month term of imprisonment and to a three-year period of supervised release. Sequeda Mortera appeals his conviction and his sentence.

Sequeda Mortera’s guideline offense level was increased by eight levels because he was convicted in state court of felony possession of a controlled substance prior to his deportation. He contends that his prior conviction involved simple possession and should not have been regarded as an aggravated felony for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(C) (2004). This argument is foreclosed. *See United States v. Rivera,*265 F.3d 310, 312-13 (5th Cir. 2001); *United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez,*130 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir.1997).

Sequeda Mortera contends that the district court abused its discretion in imposing as a condition of supervised release the requirement that he cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample. Because this issue is not ripe for review, this court does *205not have jurisdiction and this portion of the appeal must be dismissed. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed,*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Sequeda Mortera challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Sequeda Mortera contends that *Almendarez-Torres*has been “impliedly overruled” by subsequent Supreme Court decisions, including *Apprendi,*“[tjhis court has repeatedly rejected arguments like the one made by [Sequeda Mortera] and has held that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding despite *Apprendi.” United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Sequeda Mortera concedes that the issue is foreclosed. He has raised the issue to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §457. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 457 was editorially reclassified as section 5347 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,160

 1,153

 1,144

 1,131

 1,199

 1,090

 1,097

 1,113

 1,083

 1,068

 1,179

 1,014

 993

 992

 987

 981

 966

 904

 888

 885

 885

 886

 876

 872

 864

 910

 940

 975

 1,023

 1,022

 1,014

 1,143

 999

 1,124

 1,111

 1,073

 1,071

 1,082

 1,078

 1,062

 1,050

 1,000

 987

 976

 979

 966

 958

 860

 853

 879

 792

 794

 870

 867

 845

 847

 851

 842

 877

 952

 982

 944

 1,154

 1,125

 1,133

 1,118

 1,087

 1,079

 1,089

 1,084

 1,068

 1,056

 1,032

 995

 981

 984

 981

 968

 904

 870

 883

 868

 865

 877

 871

 857

 852

 881

 910

 939

 990

 1,004

 985

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER