alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo Manuel ALVARADO-DE HOYOS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41578.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 2, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Julia Bowen Stern, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s *844Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ricardo Manuel Alvarado-De Hoyos (“Alvarado”) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. Alvarado challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) & (2) and, additionally, the district court’s application of the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines.

Alvarado’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Edüd 350 (1998). Although Alvarado contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Alvarado properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Alvarado also contends that the district court erred in sentencing him pursuant to the mandatory Guidelines regime held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764-65, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The Government concedes the error and admits that it cannot carry its burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir.2005). Thus, Alvarado’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. *See id.*at 466.

AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### William Theile v. United Gas and Electric Corporation.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 507.40

 506.12

 504.85

 504.80

 505.17

 503.97

 502.72

 503.72

 504.11

 504.18

 504.05

 504.21

 504.17

 504.29

 504.50

 505.26

 504.16

 503.63

 503.94

 503.53

 502.68

 503.05

 503.19

 502.31

 501.90

 501.70

 500.94

 500.28

 501.50

 502.65

 502.06

 63,762

 62,226

 60,733

 60,676

 61,107

 59,716

 58,296

 59,431

 59,877

 59,958

 59,808

 59,993

 59,947

 60,086

 60,329

 61,213

 59,935

 59,328

 59,682

 59,214

 58,252

 58,667

 58,827

 57,837

 57,380

 57,159

 56,322

 55,607

 56,939

 58,218

 57,557

STORAGE

+1,452

-1,536

-1,493

-57

+431

-1,391

-1,420

+1,135

+446

+81

-150

+185

-46

+139

+243

+884

-1,278

-607

+354

-468

-962

+415

+160

-990

-457

-221

-837

-715

+1,332

+1,279

-661

CHANGE

1,520

-7

20

739

982

21

3

1,303

968

781

637

758

546

532

525

895

16

406

889

463

245

959

845

267

545

664

336

304

1,331

1,192

13

INFLOW

 780

 761

 764

 760

 757

 722

 717

 721

 732

 734

 708

 660

 567

 458

 398

 445

 656

 709

 706

 694

 725

 746

 758

 762

 763

 769

 753

 659

 656

 543

 345

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 8

 6

 9

 8

 8

 0

 2

 10

 11

 6

 5

 5

 2

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 5

 5

 5

 4

 6

 4

 12

 6

 5

 5

 3

 4

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 02/07/2008

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4,753 18,698 20,928 0 0 164

ACRE-FEET -4,753 37,087 41,511 0 0 325

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 41,511

SPILL 0 41,511

 62,310

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,498

 22

 22

 796

 928

 14

 14

 1,267

 952

 759

 633

 726

 512

 521

 801

 892

 21

 403

 881

 470

 249

 968

 826

 262

 528

 608

 328

 305

 1,283

 1,193

 28

 18,710

 37,111

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
(No. 1201

Claimant awarded $1,575.00.)

#### Bessie Gilbert Smith and Robert E. Smith, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion, filed May 26, 1927.*

Illinois & Michigan canal— *when award may' be made.*This case is controlled by the decision of the court, in *Illinois Traction Go.*v. *State, supra.*

Lee O’Neil Browne, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney general, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

The declaration in this case shows that the claimants were the owners of property situated in Section 13, Township 33 North, Range 1, East of the Third Principal Meridian, LaSalle county, Illinois, located one hundred feet south of the Illinois-Michigan canal, approximately three miles due east of the city of LaSalle.

On or about the 8th day of August, 1924, the south bank of the Illinois & Michigan canal broke at a point about two hundred feet from the residence of this affiant and the property above described and that the water therefrom gushed from the break in the bank covering all property belonging to the affiant’s wife above stated and continued to flow over said property for four days in a depth of approximately four feet *434-and that the influx of water from the canal caused damage to said property.

William F. Mulvihill, Superintendent of Waterways, 'made the following statement:

> I have examined the foregoing claim and believing the same to be just and true, the Division of Waterways, Department of Purchases and Construction will not oppose the allowance of the same for the amount claimed,

which is $1,575.00.

The Attorney General submits this claim to the court and recommends that an award be made in said cause.

We therefore allow said claim in the amount of $1,575.00.
March 2024

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. PUTAH 

SOUTH

PUTAH 

CREEK

C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

522

1 130.08 589 67 125 66 25 0 0.03 0.21

2 129.88 568 -21 224 66 169 0 0.04 0.97

3 129.65 546 -22 144 66 89 0 0.08 0.20

4 130.45 628 82 132 66 25 0 0.11 0.12

5 130.78 665 37 110 66 25 0 0.02 0.00

6 130.93 682 17 100 66 25 0 0.04 0.00

7 130.93 682 0 91 66 25 0 0.05 0.00

8 130.83 670 -12 86 66 25 1 0.15 0.00

9 130.69 655 -15 84 66 25 1 0.22 0.00

10 130.56 640 -15 83 66 25 0 0.09 0.00

11 130.35 618 -22 80 66 25 0 0.09 0.05

12 130.42 625 7 96 66 25 1 0.14 0.12

13 130.38 621 -4 89 66 25 0 0.11 0.06

14 130.01 582 -39 108 73 54 1 0.41 0.00

15 130.23 604 22 162 75 75 1 0.27 0.00

16 130.19 600 -4 149 75 75 1 0.26 0.00

17 130.67 652 52 177 75 75 1 0.21 0.00

18 130.85 673 21 162 75 75 1 0.15 0.00

19 130.49 632 -41 141 86 75 1 0.14 0.00

20 130.31 613 -19 156 90 75 1 0.21 0.00

21 130.16 597 -16 299 94 212 1 0.16 0.00

22 130.31 613 16 400 91 300 1 0.15 0.00

23 130.28 610 -3 522 86 437 1 0.15 0.11

24 130.19 600 -10 604 82 527 0 0.11 0.06

25 130.14 595 -5 595 92 505 1 0.17 0.00

26 129.97 578 -17 560 98 470 1 0.18 0.00

27 129.95 576 -2 478 98 381 0 0.14 0.00

28 130.12 593 17 534 101 424 0 0.03 0.18

29 130.03 584 -9 602 102 505 0 0.09 0.02

30 130.30 612 28 615 96 505 0 0.09 0.49

31 130.36 619 7 604 90 510 0 0.08 0.16

TOTALS 97 8,312 2,437 5,813 15 4.17 2.75

ACRE-FEET 97 16,487 4,834 11,530 30

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Putah South Canal 4,834

Putah Creek 11,530

Total 16,364

Precipitation

This month = 2.75

October 01, 2023 To date = 22.39

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Solano Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/23/2024
### §146. Report of Indians present and receiving food

Whenever the issue of food, clothing, or supplies of any kind to Indians is provided for, it shall be the duty of the agent or commissioner issuing the same, at such issue thereof, whether it be both of food and clothing, or either of them, or of any kind of supplies, to report to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs the number of Indians present and actually receiving the same.

(R.S. §2109.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2109 derived from act Feb. 14, 1873, ch. 138, §7, 17 Stat. 463, 464.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with. See note set out under section 64 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! Blue Rim

Pasture

Big Mesa Pasture

Sand Draw

Pasture

South Desert Pasture

Alkali Draw Pasture

Calpet

Pasture

Reardon

Canyon

Pasture

East

Chimney

West Pasture

Chimney

Pasture

Pine Grove

Ridge

Pasture

Gentle

Annie

Pasture

Hogsback

Pasture

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Pastures

LaBarge Wild Horse Herd Areas

Desert Wild Horse Herd Areas

Water

Wild Horse Herd Areas

Map 2-05

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Cottonwood Creek

New

Fork River

La Barge Creek

Middle Piney Creek

Green River

Gree n River

H o rse Creek

B eaver Cre e k

Muddy C reek

Fontenelle River

East Fork River

Boulder Creek

Pole

Creek

Fontenelle

Reservoir
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors ofAnheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV : 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-169514) andon Form S-8 (Nos. 333-172069, 333-171231, 333-169272, 333-165566, 333-165065 and 333-178664) of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV of our report dated April 14, 2010, with respect to the consolidated statement of financial position of Anheuser-Busch InBevSA/NV and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which reportappears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV for the year ended December 31, 2011. 

KPMG Bedrijfsrevisoren –Réviseurs d’Entreprises 

Statutory auditor 

represented by 

/s/ Jos Briers 

*Réviseur d’Entreprises/Bedrijfsrevisor*

Brussels, BELGIUM 

April 12, 2012
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of   December, 2002

Commission File Number 333-7182-01

                                   CEZ, a. s.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                        Form 20-F  X       Form 40-F
                                  ---                ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                               Yes          No  X
                                   ---         ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________
<PAGE>

The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s. in Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:

CEZ, a. s. signed coal supply agreements for year 2003 with Sokolovska uhelna,
a.s. and Severoceske doly, a.s.
<PAGE>

                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                       CEZ, a. s.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                                      (Registrant)
Date: January 6, 2003

                                        By:
                                           -------------------------------------
                                                     Libuse Latalova
                                              Head of Finance Administration
Lydia Wegman to: Laity, James A., Mancini, Dominic J. 06/01/2010 06:04 PM

Cc: Scott Mathias, Richard Wayland, James Hemby, Sara Schneeberg, 

Kevin McLean, Mike Thrift, Larry Wallace, Tricia Crabtree

Jim and Dom, 

Below is an edited version of the paragraph Jim sent us on the use of monitoring and modeling. Based on 

our discussion, we believe it addresses your concerns. If you agree with this language, we would plan to 

place it at the end of the Section III. Let us know what you think. 

For the reasons discussed above, EPA has determined that it is appropriate and efficient to 

principally use modeling to assess compliance for medium to larger sources, and to rely more on 

monitoring for groups of smaller sources and sources not as conducive to modeling. EPA’s 

revised monitoring network requirements have been developed to be consistent with this 

approach. However, EPA is still considering how monitoring and modeling data would be used 

together in specific situations to define attainment and nonattainment boundaries and under what 

circumstances it may be appropriate to rely on monitoring data alone to make attainment 

determinations. EPA intends to address these issues as it develops in implementation guidance.
#### Walter C. Burr and Others v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company.

Application denied, with ten dollars costs. Order signed. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.443 Contact with former U.S. workers.

The employer must contact (by mail or other effective means) its former U.S. workers, including those who have been laid off within 270 calendar days before the date of need, employed by the employer in the occupation at the place(s) of employment during the previous year (except those who were dismissed for cause or who abandoned the place(s) of employment), provide a copy of the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* and solicit their return to the job. This contact must occur during the period of time that the job offer is being advertised on the CNMI Department of Labor's job listing system under § 655.442. The employer must retain documentation sufficient to prove such contact in accordance with § 655.456. An employer has no obligation to contact U.S. workers it terminated for cause or who abandoned employment at any time during the previous year, if the employer provided timely notice to the NPC of the termination or abandonment in the manner described in § 655.423(v).
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                               KAYDON CORPORATION
          CALCULATION OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
       THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPT 27, 1997 AND SEPT 28, 1996

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED                         NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                          Sept 27, 1997        Sept 28, 1996       Sept 27, 1997     Sept 28, 1996
                                          -------------        -------------       -------------     -------------
<S>                                           <C>                <C>                  <C>                <C>
Primary Earnings Per Share:

Net income                                    $15,770,000        $12,366,000          $45,555,000        $37,727,000
                                              -----------        -----------          -----------        -----------


Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                           32,992,000         32,868,000           32,992,000         32,868,000

Net common shares issuable in respect
  to common stock equivalents, with
  a dilutive effect                               202,000            284,000              148,000            212,000
                                              -----------        -----------          -----------        -----------

Total weighted average common and
  common share equivalents                     33,194,000         33,152,000           33,140,000         33,080,000

Primary earnings per common share             $      0.47        $      0.37          $      1.37        $      1.14



Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share:

Net income                                    $15,770,000        $12,366,000          $45,555,000        $37,727,000
                                              -----------        -----------          -----------        -----------


Weighted average common
  shares outstanding                           32,992,000         32,868,000           32,992,000         32,868,000

Net common shares issuable in respect
  to common stock equivalents, with
  a dilutive effect                               214,000            290,000              154,000            232,000
                                              -----------        -----------          -----------        -----------

Total weighted average common and
  common share equivalents                     33,206,000         33,158,000           33,146,000         33,100,000

Fully diluted earnings per common share       $      0.47        $      0.37          $      1.37        $      1.14

</TABLE>
NOTE:   Weighted average common shares and all per share amounts reflect a
        two-for-one stock split effective October 7, 1997.


                                     E-1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 499.86

 499.53

 499.10

 501.46

 501.00

 500.56

 500.00

 499.32

 499.72

 499.88

 500.72

 502.38

 501.07

 500.88

 500.05

 503.61

 501.18

 499.03

 499.69

 499.76

 501.81

 501.10

 499.90

 499.37

 501.63

 501.77

 501.74

 501.83

 501.84

 501.00

 500.90

 55,154

 54,802

 54,343

 56,894

 56,387

 55,910

 55,303

 54,577

 55,004

 55,175

 56,083

 57,916

 56,464

 56,257

 55,357

 59,305

 56,586

 54,268

 54,972

 55,047

 57,280

 56,497

 55,196

 54,631

 57,082

 57,236

 57,203

 57,302

 57,314

 56,387

 56,279

STORAGE

-322

-352

-459

+2,551

-507

-477

-607

-726

+427

+171

+908

+1,833

-1,452

-207

-900

+3,948

-2,719

-2,318

+704

+75

+2,233

-783

-1,301

-565

+2,451

+154

-33

+99

+12

-927

-108

CHANGE

53

38

34

1,464

30

43

21

30

612

789

1,378

1,945

329

1,177

909

3,362

375

827

2,352

2,311

3,478

2,057

1,873

2,367

3,948

2,791

2,701

2,749

2,671

2,177

2,464

INFLOW

 210

 212

 262

 173

 281

 279

 324

 392

 391

 633

 915

 1,017

 1,057

 1,279

 1,359

 1,369

 1,665

 1,834

 1,831

 1,835

 1,847

 1,852

 1,848

 1,838

 1,844

 1,851

 1,838

 1,839

 1,837

 1,834

 1,835

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 62

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 47

 82

 82

 20

 447

 525

 618

 720

 738

 816

 849

 793

 764

 756

 602

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 28

 76

 79

 413

 53

 69

 57

 87

 123

 42

 25

 63

 59

 51

 76

OUTLET

 5

 3

 3

 5

 5

 4

 3

 4

 6

 6

 5

 4

 4

 2

 4

 3

 6

 4

 5

 5

 5

 6

 6

 7

 7

 4

 6

 4

 5

 3

 5

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/25/2008

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +803 47,355 37,581 7,921 1,303 144

ACRE-FEET +803 93,929 74,542 15,711 2,585 286

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 74,542

SPILL 15,711 92,838

 55,476

OUTLET 2,585

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 14

 14

 18

 1,519

 14

 14

 15

 13

 603

 770

 1,327

 1,925

 294

 1,131

 910

 3,305

 344

 848

 2,288

 2,248

 3,430

 2,101

 1,918

 2,425

 3,987

 2,890

 2,861

 2,914

 2,859

 2,370

 2,548

 47,917

 95,043

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Iowa First  Bancshares  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, D.
Scott Ingstad, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ D. Scott Ingstad
----------------------
D. Scott Ingstad
Chairman of the Board,
President and CEO

August 13, 2004


                                       1