alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,296.78

 2,296.50

 2,296.17

 2,295.77

 2,295.35

 2,294.85

 2,294.28

 2,293.58

 2,292.90

 2,292.36

 2,291.88

 2,291.41

 2,290.95

 2,290.60

 2,290.32

 2,289.91

 2,289.66

 2,289.50

 2,289.26

 2,288.88

 2,288.48

 2,288.08

 2,287.68

 2,287.32

 2,286.72

 2,286.27

 2,285.82

 2,285.44

 2,285.23

 2,285.22

 2,285.21

 1,424.4

 1,421.2

 1,417.4

 1,412.8

 1,407.9

 1,402.2

 1,395.6

 1,387.6

 1,379.9

 1,373.8

 1,368.4

 1,363.1

 1,357.9

 1,354.0

 1,350.8

 1,346.3

 1,343.5

 1,341.7

 1,339.0

 1,334.8

 1,330.4

 1,326.0

 1,321.6

 1,317.6

 1,311.1

 1,306.2

 1,301.3

 1,297.2

 1,294.9

 1,294.8

 1,294.7

STORAGE

-3.7

-3.2

-3.8

-4.6

-4.8

-5.8

-6.5

-8.0

-7.7

-6.1

-5.4

-5.3

-5.2

-3.9

-3.1

-4.6

-2.8

-1.8

-2.7

-4.2

-4.4

-4.4

-4.4

-3.9

-6.6

-4.9

-4.9

-4.1

-2.3

-0.1

-0.1

CHANGE

52

303

839

160

110

588

3

7

5

327

332

214

231

1

872

0

0

126

918

259

253

370

556

797

0

313

197

108

55

516

732

INFLOW

 1,877

 1,889

 2,710

 2,436

 2,493

 3,441

 3,256

 4,000

 3,850

 3,373

 3,026

 2,846

 2,801

 1,930

 2,416

 2,287

 1,373

 977

 2,228

 2,356

 2,444

 2,565

 2,729

 2,748

 3,285

 2,758

 2,655

 2,174

 1,200

 570

 784

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 48

 51

 58

 54

 58

 47

 40

 37

 57

 37

 43

 36

 40

 46

 36

 23

 29

 46

 36

 29

 36

 32

 42

 39

 22

 26

 6

 6

 0

 0

 3

C.F.S.

 .14

 .15

 .17

 .16

 .17

 .14

 .12

 .11

 .17

 .11

 .13

 .11

 .12

 .14

 .11

 .07

 .09

 .14

 .11

 .09

 .11

 .10

 .13

 .12

 .07

 .08

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .64

 .23

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 28, 2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -133.3 9,244 75,477 0 0 1,063 3.21 .87

ACRE-FEET -133,300 18,335 149,709 0 0 2,108

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 149,709

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 149,709

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .87

JULY 1, 2001 2.30

 1,428.2

(1) (1)
### §1951. Information availability to and disclosure by Secretary

#### (a) Copy of final decree or order; other information; anonymity affidavit; exemption from Freedom of Information Act

Any State court entering a final decree or order in any Indian child adoptive placement after November 8, 1978, shall provide the Secretary with a copy of such decree or order together with such other information as may be necessary to show—

(1) the name and tribal affiliation of the child;

(2) the names and addresses of the biological parents;

(3) the names and addresses of the adoptive parents; and

(4) the identity of any agency having files or information relating to such adoptive placement.

Where the court records contain an affidavit of the biological parent or parents that their identity remain confidential, the court shall include such affidavit with the other information. The Secretary shall insure that the confidentiality of such information is maintained and such information shall not be subject to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), as amended.

#### (b) Disclosure of information for enrollment of Indian child in tribe or for determination of member rights or benefits; certification of entitlement to enrollment

Upon the request of the adopted Indian child over the age of eighteen, the adoptive or foster parents of an Indian child, or an Indian tribe, the Secretary shall disclose such information as may be necessary for the enrollment of an Indian child in the tribe in which the child may be eligible for enrollment or for determining any rights or benefits associated with that membership. Where the documents relating to such child contain an affidavit from the biological parent or parents requesting anonymity, the Secretary shall certify to the Indian child's tribe, where the information warrants, that the child's parentage and other circumstances of birth entitle the child to enrollment under the criteria established by such tribe.

(Pub. L. 95–608, title III, §301, Nov. 8, 1978, 92 Stat. 3077.)
### Part H—National Fund for Excellence in American Indian Education

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This part was comprised of title VIII, formerly title V, of Pub. L. 93–638, which was formerly classified to part F (§458bbb et seq.) of this subchapter prior to redesignation by Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §231(d)(1), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2278, transfer to this part, and editorial redesignation of this part as subchapter VII (§5421 et seq.) of chapter 46 of this title.
Central Valley Operations

Date Posted: 2/26/2024

Tulloch Reservoir Spring Refill Schedule -- Water Year 2024

The Spring refill schedule for Tulloch Reservoir is provided below. This schedule complies with U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers flood control requirements. The reservoir will generally be managed to the 

target elevation range; however, some variation may occur due to large local inflows. 

ELEVATION RANGE (in feet)

 FROM THROUGH LOW (ft) HIGH (ft)

2/28/24 3/05/24 495 498

3/06/24 3/12/24 496 499

3/13/24 3/19/24 497 500

3/20/24 3/26/24 498 501

3/27/24 4/02/24 499 502

4/03/24 4/09/24 500 503

4/10/24 4/16/24 501 504

4/17/24 4/23/24 502 505

4/24/24 4/30/24 503 507

5/01/24 5/07/24 504 507

5/08/24 5/14/24 505 508

5/15/24 5/21/24 506 509

5/22/24 5/28/24 506.5 509.5

5/29/24 9/15/24 506.5 509

Note: Lake Tulloch Spring Refill Schedule
#### Anna Lewis, Respondent, *v.*Hester Stevenson et al., as Executors of George Stevenson, Deceased, Appellants.

*Per Curiam.*

Even if we accept all of the testimony in the case (including that which it is urged should have been rejected under section 347 of the Civil Practice Act) the evidence is legally insufficient to support an implied promise by the decedent to pay the plaintiff the reasonable value of services she rendered to him for seven years prior to his death, as housekeeper, practical nurse, secretary and companion. Indeed, it appears affirmatively in the plaintiff’s own case that she acted as one of the family and that the deceased brought her to his home “to take care of her, because he was her godfather and he didn’t want to see her, you know, traveling around, half sick, and he had taken her in his home to care for her.” (Cf. *Matter of Hughes,*229 App. Div. 614.) The evidence being legally insufficient to sustain an implied promise, the case should not have been submitted to the jury and the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict should have been granted. *(Boyd*v. *Boyd,*252 N. Y. 422, 429; *Bank of United States*v. *Manheim,*264 N. Y. 45, 51; *Blum*v. *Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.,*292 N. Y. 241, 245; *Ruthizer*v. *Bass Dress Corp.,*264 App. Div. 372; *Matter of Whipple,*294 N. Y. 292, 294.)

The judgment should be reversed and the complaint dismissed on the merits, without costs.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and the complaint dismissed upon the merits, without costs.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) of MCG Capital Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Beverly Jane Alley, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                        
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




/s/    BEVERLY JANE ALLEYName:Beverly Jane AlleyTitle:Chief Financial OfficerDateMarch 2, 2015
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 17.502 Application.

This part applies to all programs and activities conducted and/or administered and/or maintained by the agency except for programs or activities conducted outside the United States that do not involve handicapped persons in the United States.
202-226-2356 04:37:03 p.m. 12-13-2013 1 i1

CiarY C. Peter5 COI.'IMITTEE ON FINANCI.ALSERVICE-S

MEN113ER OF CONGRESS SOBCOMMIT'TEE ON CAYITAL 11'IARRETS .ANL7 14Tr1 UISTRICr, MICHIGarI GOVERNhtEN'C-SPONSORED EN'rFR1'R76ES

V c0ngrc^ ^

u q O f E anite^ y* L {. ^ ate $t1BC'.OMM(rrEL- tt1 ON 0N£TARY POLIi'Y ^VWW.^.TE18tS.^30USC.kOV ANDTIiADE ^OU^¢ Of ^¢llr¢g¢iTtAtlbP^ SENIOR t\'HIP

t' ^^ g iaiutgton, OC, 20515 

### December 11, 2013 The Honorable Regina McCarthy, Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Dear Administrator McCarthy: I write to ask that you quickly finalize Tier 3 regulations to reduce sulfur content in gasoline and emissions from Iight-duty cars and trucks. Finalizing these regulations will benefit the economy, public health, and provide automotive industry businesses with certainty. The automotive industry has stepped up to meet the challenge of reducing harmfitl cmissions while improving the performance and reliability of new vehicles. The United States remains a world leader in designing, engineering and manufacturing advanced engine systems that have reduced vehicle emissions by 75% 

### while vehicle miles traveled have tripled. Vehicle and emissions control manufacturers have worked together to come up with solutions to the country's persistent air pollution challenges. Finalizing the Tier 3 regulation will help continue this success and encourage job-creating investment in emissions control equipment manufacturing. A final rule will also provide for harmonization of federal and states' vehicle emissions standards. This can help reduce the costs associated with both engine systems research and development and with vehicle production and after-market maintenance and performance. To meet the Tier 3 and greenhouse gas requirements and achieve maximum benefits for air quality, vehicle effieiency, and long-term vehicle performance, the final rule must quickly reduce sulfur content in gasoline to the lowest levels possible. Many petroleum refiners already produce low sulfur fuel, and some are exporting record quantities to overseas markets. Lower-sulfur fuels will provide more opportunities to introduce new high efficiency engine technologies and increase the performance of emission catalysts. I strongly encourage quick promulgation of the Tier 3 rule to provide ample time for automakers and their suppliers to rneet Model Year 2017 design, engineering and production requirements. Doing so will help create and maintain jobs in this important sector and deliver air quality benefits at the lowest cost for consumers. Thank you for your attention to this important matter. ^.—^.--

Gary C. Peters Member of Congress Co-Chair, Congressional Automotive Caucus I]ISTRICi" OCF10E- wASHINGTON OFFICE 400 Monroe StreeL Suite 290 1609 Longworth Hause Oflice fluilding Dctroit, MI 48216 \Vasitington, DC 20515 (313) 964-9960 (202) 225-58(YL FAX (313) 964-9959 FAh (202) 226-2356
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of J.F., a child, * From the 326th District Court

 of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 08921-CX.

No. 11-19-00189-CV * November 7, 2019

 * Memorandum Opinion by Stretcher, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

 Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 19

- 00 76

_____________________________
F RANCES W ILCOX , Appellant,

v.

P UBLIX and P UBLIX R ISK M ANAGEMENT , Appellee s

.

_____________________________

On appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims

. Jonathan E. Walker , Judge

.
Date of Accident: August 24, 2009.

July 3, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , W ETHERELL , and R OWE , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Nicolette E. Tsambis of Smith, Feddeler, Smith, P.A., Lakeland
, for Appellant.

Thomas P. Vecchio of Vecchio, Carrier, Feldman & Johannessen, P.A., Lakeland
, for Appellee s

.
§ 20.201 Ethics officials. ( a ) *Designated Agency Ethics Official* refers to the official designated under 5 CFR 2638.201 to coordinate and manage the Department's ethics program.
( b ) The head of each bureau is the “Ethics Counselor” for that bureau, except that the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy is the Ethics Counselor for employees in the Office of the Secretary and related offices. The Solicitor is the Ethics Counselor for the Office of the Solicitor and the Inspector General is the Ethics Counselor for the Office of Inspector General.
( c ) The personnel officer for each bureau or other qualified employee who has been delegated responsibility for the operational duties of the Ethics Counselor for the bureau, it the “Deputy Ethics Counselor” for that bureau.
( d ) A bureau, regional, or area personnel officer or other qualified employee may be assigned to serve as an “Associate Ethics Counselor” or “Assistant Ethics Counselor,” with delegated responsibility to perform the operational duties of the Ethics Counselor at the field level. Associate Ethics Counselors or Assistant Ethics Counselors may also be designated within the bureau headquarters.
[62 FR 53720, Oct. 16, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 34259, June 24, 1998]
### §1300b–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–467, §3, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 781, which prohibited the Secretary from approving plans for the use of money specified in former section 1300b–1 of this title until at least thirty days after the plans have been submitted by the Secretary to Congressional committees, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 702.801 Scope and intent of this subpart. ( a ) This subpart implements the Act's provisions that affect the maximum and minimum rates of compensation and death benefits payable to employees and survivors. These statutory provisions include sections 6(b) and (c), and 9(e). 33 U.S.C. 906(b), (c); 909(e). It is intended that these statutory provisions be construed as provided in this subpart.
( b ) These regulations implement section 6(c), 33 U.S.C. 906(c), based on the following concepts: ( 1 ) An employee is “newly awarded compensation” when he or she first becomes disabled due to an injury;
( 2 ) A survivor is “newly awarded compensation” on the date the employee died; and
( 3 ) An employee or survivor is “currently receiving compensation” when compensation for permanent total disability or death benefits is payable, regardless of when payment is actually made.
Table 27

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Tehama-Colusa Canal

Preliminary Data Subject to Change 2024

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water Users Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Colusa County WD 0 197 737 3192 4126

Cortina WD 0 4 7 32 43

Davis WD 0 0 37 113 150

Dunnigan WD 0 0 260 1291 1551

4-M Water District 0 0 0 42 42

Glenn-Colusa ID 0 0 2752 1860 4612

Glenn Valley WD 0 0 0 82 82

Glide WD 0 1 17 31 49

Holthouse WD 0 0 2 23 25

Kanawha WD 0 5 93 326 424

Kirkwood WD 0 0 0 0 0

La Grande WD 0 0 0 0 0

Myers-Marsh MWC 0 0 0 0 0

Orland-Artois WD 0 120 963 1773 2856

Westside WD 0 4 242 993 1239

Total 0 331 5110 9758 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15199

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
### §§171 to 173. Repealed. May 21, 1934, ch. 321, 48 Stat. 787

Section 171, R.S. §2111, related to imposition of a penalty for sending seditious messages intending to contravene a United States treaty or law.

Section 172, R.S. §2112, related to imposition of a penalty for carrying seditious messages intending to contravene a United States treaty or law.

Section 173, R.S. §2113, related to imposition of a penalty for corresponding with foreign nations intending to incite Indians to war.
**EXHIBIT 24.1**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOWALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of NewPage Corporation,a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), hereby constitutes and appointsMatthew L. Jesch, Douglas K. Cooper and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, withfull power to act without the others, the undersigned’s true and lawfulattorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution andre-substitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name, place andstead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005, including any and all amendments andsupplements thereto, and to file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, with allexhibits and schedules thereto and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to doeach and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might orcould do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that suchattorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute orsubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director has caused this Power of Attorney tobe executed this 23rd day of March, 2006.

 

 
|   | /s/ John Sheridan   |   |
|--------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Name: John Sheridan |

 

----
Exhibit 13.1

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each undersigned officer of
Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2013 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |        |  |                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: 24 March 2014 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Carlos Brito                    
|                    |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Carlos Brito                        
|                    |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer             
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: 24 March 2014 |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Felipe Dutra                    
|                    |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Felipe Dutra                        
|                    |  |  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial & Technology Officer
(No. 1107

Claimant awarded $17,350.75.)

#### Richard E. Schmidt and Hugh M. G. Garden, Partners, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 29,*1927.

*Contract*— when *State liable.*Where a contract has been entered into between claimant and the State, for architectural services in the construction of its State building, and the appropriation for the construction of the building lapses before the amount due claimant under the contract is determined: *Held.*The State is liable for the balance due claimant under the contract.

Willard L. King, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Roy D. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Thomas

delivered the opinion of the court:

Claimants are architects and reside in the city of Chicago. On the 19th day of April, 1920, they entered into a contract with the State of Illinois to perform the necessary architectural services in the construction of the Research and Educational Hospital in Cook county. For these services they were to receive 4% of the contract price of the cost of the buildings.

It is agreed between counsel for claimants and the Attorney General that the total contracts for the buildings aggregated the sum of $2,189,303.35, upon which claimants were entitled to a fee of 4% amounting to $87,572.13; that payments have been made to claimants aggregating the sum of $70,221.38, leaving a balance due them of $17,350.75.

The appropriation for the construction of the buildings having lapsed before the total amount due claimants could be determined it became necessary for them to present their claim for the balance due them to this court for adjudication.

The Attorney General admits that claimants have proven their contract and performed the services under it, and there appears to be no reason why the amount due them should not be allowed.

The court therefore awards to claimants the sum of $17,350.75..