alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent *v.*Patrick Flynn and John Sullivan, Appellants.

First Department,

May 31, 1949.

*351
      *John P. Sweeny*for appellants.

*Edwin C. Hoyt, Jr.*of counsel *(Whitman Knapp*with him on the brief; *Frank S. Hogan, District Attorney),*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The case before us is one in which it cannot be said that the evidence points overwhelmingly to defendants’ guilt of the only crime of which the jury found them guilty, viz., robbery in the first degree. Accordingly, errors made are proportionately more grave and serious and may well have improperly influenced the jury’s verdict.

As defendant Sullivan took the stand, it was proper to ask him concerning any specific acts in his career that would tend to discredit him or impeach his moral character. But such military offenses as A.W.O.L. were not per se proof of such and the military court-martial convictions admitted by Sullivan for fighting or *“*assaults ” were not within contemplation of the law “ crimes ”. The reference in the charge to such court-martial offenses of defendant Sullivan as “ crimes ” was improper and prejudicial. Properly speaking, conviction for crime is ordinarily such as is found after a trial in a court of law *(People*v. *Sullivan,*34 App. Div. 544, 548; *People*v. *Dorthy,*20 App. Div. 308, 320, affd. 156 N. Y. 237). We think also the court erred in charging that other witnesses had no motive to testify falsely but defendants did as “ Their liberty is at stake.” The reference also to the absence of the witness Grimes —1 £ Where is Grimes?” — was clearly prejudicial, especially in view of the fact that defendants’ counsel at the close of the case had stated that he might call Grimes. There was no showing that Grimes knew at first hand anything about the alleged crime, and he was equally available to the People.

Defendant Flynn’s torn shirt was properly admitted into evidence as an exhibit; but under the circumstances it was improper to shut off defendants’ counsel from any comment and the trial court’s remark that the claimed bloodstains “ speak for themselves ’ ’ was in the context another prejudicial suggestion from the bench.

*352The testimony of the witness McClain was crucial. The affidavits submitted on the motion for a new trial, not met by any denying affidavits by the District Attorney, indicated the falsity of some of his testimony at the trial. While the affidavits were not in themselves sufficient to justify granting a new trial, yet considered with the above errors in a case such as the one before us, we think in the interest of substantial justice that a new trial should be ordered (cf. Code Crim. Pro., § 527).

The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

Peck, P. J., Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur; Glennon and Callahan, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 505.52

 505.14

 504.80

 504.48

 504.04

 503.70

 503.71

 503.76

 503.62

 503.71

 503.61

 503.42

 503.39

 503.98

 504.49

 503.81

 504.06

 503.80

 504.06

 504.34

 503.64

 502.97

 502.13

 501.62

 501.80

 501.90

 501.67

 500.78

 501.20

 500.44

 500.70

 61,519

 61,072

 60,676

 60,305

 59,796

 59,408

 59,419

 59,476

 59,317

 59,419

 59,305

 59,089

 59,055

 59,727

 60,317

 59,533

 59,819

 59,522

 59,819

 60,143

 59,340

 58,576

 57,636

 57,071

 57,269

 57,380

 57,126

 56,149

 56,608

 55,780

 56,062

STORAGE

+247

-447

-396

-371

-509

-388

+11

+57

-159

+102

-114

-216

-34

+672

+590

-784

+286

-297

+297

+324

-803

-764

-940

-565

+198

+111

-254

-977

+459

-828

+282

CHANGE

1,048

659

667

724

652

702

899

924

789

906

794

663

666

744

692

-4

534

431

1,089

1,106

527

544

459

648

1,044

816

396

-12

634

-18

543

INFLOW

 911

 876

 861

 904

 902

 891

 884

 886

 863

 846

 843

 764

 676

 396

 385

 387

 386

 575

 933

 938

 928

 924

 928

 904

 939

 756

 519

 481

 401

 395

 399

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 23

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 12

 8

 6

 7

 7

 7

 9

 9

 6

 9

 8

 8

 7

 9

 10

 4

 4

 6

 6

 5

 4

 5

 5

 6

 5

 4

 5

 0

 2

 4

 2

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 03/14/2006

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -5,210 20,266 22,681 0 23 189

ACRE-FEET -5,210 40,198 44,988 0 46 375

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 44,988

SPILL 0 45,034

 61,272

OUTLET 46

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,118

 740

 743

 789

 720

 728

 930

 932

 862

 902

 848

 689

 711

 763

 724

 0

 579

 479

 1,148

 1,134

 568

 587

 518

 672

 1,076

 847

 446

 35

 688

 32

 577

 21,585

 42,814

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Alberto LOPEZ-PINEDA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50773.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis Alberto Lopez-Pineda raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and *309the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### County of Lewis, Appellant, v. Town of Diana, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in an action for property damage to a bridge owned and maintained by plaintiff, claimed to have resulted by reason of the negligent operation of a heavy snowplow by an agent of defendant.) Present — Taylor, P. J., MeCum, Love and Vaughan, JJ. [188 Mise. 376.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,348.85

 2,349.55

 2,350.13

 2,350.66

 2,351.22

 2,351.78

 2,352.27

 2,352.75

 2,353.09

 2,353.43

 2,353.76

 2,354.09

 2,354.34

 2,354.65

 2,355.02

 2,355.43

 2,356.00

 2,356.72

 2,357.39

 2,358.02

 2,358.49

 2,358.90

 2,359.32

 2,359.78

 2,360.27

 2,360.71

 2,361.10

 2,361.39

 2,361.67

 2,361.75

 2,116.6

 2,127.1

 2,135.9

 2,143.8

 2,152.3

 2,160.8

 2,168.2

 2,175.5

 2,180.7

 2,185.8

 2,190.9

 2,195.9

 2,199.7

 2,204.5

 2,210.1

 2,216.4

 2,225.2

 2,236.2

 2,246.6

 2,256.3

 2,263.6

 2,270.0

 2,276.5

 2,283.6

 2,291.3

 2,298.2

 2,304.3

 2,308.8

 2,313.2

 2,314.5

STORAGE

+8.7

+10.5

+8.7

+8.0

+8.5

+8.5

+7.4

+7.3

+5.2

+5.2

+5.0

+5.0

+3.8

+4.7

+5.7

+6.3

+8.7

+11.1

+10.3

+9.7

+7.3

+6.4

+6.5

+7.2

+7.6

+6.9

+6.1

+4.6

+4.4

+1.3

CHANGE

4,872

5,577

4,803

4,418

4,513

4,608

4,281

4,095

3,153

2,907

2,930

2,990

3,085

2,828

3,171

3,449

4,786

5,952

5,605

5,270

4,681

3,927

4,199

4,129

4,275

4,042

3,943

3,848

3,557

3,331

INFLOW

 445

 228

 306

 315

 202

 260

 470

 385

 495

 232

 341

 386

 1,082

 357

 282

 277

 341

 308

 317

 298

 984

 685

 875

 506

 418

 487

 790

 1,461

 1,235

 2,006

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 635

OUTLET

 53

 53

 102

 75

 49

 76

 67

 36

 54

 63

 54

 67

 76

 81

 36

 0

 36

 54

 77

 64

 23

 37

 32

 14

 0

 87

 74

 88

 102

 56

C.F.S.

 .12

 .12

 .23

 .17

 .11

 .17

 .15

 .08

 .12

 .14

 .12

 .15

 .17

 .18

 .08

 .00

 .08

 .12

 .17

 .14

 .05

 .08

 .07

 .03

 .00

 .19

 .16

 .19

 .22

 .12

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .32

 .23

 .00

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .63

 .00

 .07

 .28

 .09

 .02

 .00

 1.87

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 9, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +206.6 123,225 16,774 0 638 1,686 3.73 3.75

ACRE-FEET +206,600 244,417 33,271 0 1,265 3,344

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 33,271

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,265

 34,536

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.75

JULY 1, 2010 36.15

 2,108.0

(1) (1)
#### Mark J. MEYER, Petitioner—Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-74459.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*779Mark J. Meyer, Honolulu, HI, Pro Se.

Lynne L. Glasser, Donald L. Korb, Acting Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service, Robert L. Baker, Esq., Eileen J. O’Connor, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Mark J. Meyer appeals pro se from the Tax Court’s decision dismissing for failure to state a claim his petition challenging the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s (“Commissioner”) notice of deficiency for tax year 2003. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482. We review de novo a Tax Court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, *Grimes v. Comm’r,*806 F.2d 1451, 1453 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam), and we affirm.

The Tax Court properly dismissed Meyer’s amended petition for failure to state a claim because he did not set forth a clear and concise assignment of error or any facts demonstrating error in the Commissioner’s determinations. *See*Tax Ct. R. 34(b)(4); *Grimes,*806 F.2d at 1453-54. Meyer also failed to appear at the hearing on the government’s motion to dismiss.

Meyer’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

We grant the Commissioner’s December 6, 2005, motion requesting sanctions in the amount of $6,000, because the arguments raised in Meyer’s appeal are frivolous. *See Grimes,*806 F.2d at 1454. Meyer’s December 22, 2005 motion to deny and strike the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions is accordingly denied.

AFFIRMED WITH SANCTIONS

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §4044. Reconciliation report

The Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Indian Affairs of the Senate, by May 31, 1996, a report identifying for each tribal trust fund account for which the Secretary is responsible a balance reconciled as of September 30, 1995. In carrying out this section, the Secretary shall consult with the Special Trustee. The report shall include—

(1) a description of the Secretary's methodology in reconciling trust fund accounts;

(2) attestations by each account holder that—

(A) the Secretary has provided the account holder with as full and complete accounting as possible of the account holder's funds to the earliest possible date, and that the account holder accepts the balance as reconciled by the Secretary; or

(B) the account holder disputes the balance of the account holder's account as reconciled by the Secretary and statement explaining why the account holder disputes the Secretary's reconciled balance; and

(3) a statement by the Secretary with regard to each account balance disputed by the account holder outlining efforts the Secretary will undertake to resolve the dispute.

(Pub. L. 103–412, title III, §304, Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4248.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Settlement of Tribal Claims

Pub. L. 107–153, §1, Mar. 19, 2002, 116 Stat. 79, as amended by Pub. L. 109–158, §1, Dec. 30, 2005, 119 Stat. 2954, provided that:

"(a) In General.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of determining the date on which an Indian tribe received a reconciliation report for purposes of applying a statute of limitations, any such report provided to or received by an Indian tribe in response to section 304 of the American Indian Trust Fund Management Reform Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. 4044) shall be deemed to have been received by the Indian tribe on December 31, 2000.

"(b) Statement of Purpose.—Subsection (a) is solely intended to provide recipients of reconciliation reports with the opportunity to postpone the filing of claims, or to facilitate the voluntary dismissal of claims, to encourage settlement negotiations with the United States."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 505.69

 505.29

 505.22

 505.73

 504.49

 504.77

 503.39

 504.11

 504.22

 502.96

 503.77

 502.42

 504.40

 503.32

 505.06

 504.71

 504.36

 504.00

 503.63

 502.14

 503.03

 503.11

 501.57

 501.77

 502.04

 502.10

 500.41

 499.67

 499.59

 500.21

 500.70

 61,718

 61,248

 61,166

 61,765

 60,317

 60,641

 59,055

 59,877

 60,005

 58,565

 59,488

 57,960

 60,213

 58,975

 60,978

 60,571

 60,167

 59,750

 59,328

 57,647

 58,644

 58,735

 57,016

 57,236

 57,535

 57,602

 55,747

 54,951

 54,866

 55,531

 56,062

STORAGE

-401

-470

-82

+599

-1,448

+324

-1,586

+822

+128

-1,440

+923

-1,528

+2,253

-1,238

+2,003

-407

-404

-417

-422

-1,681

+997

+91

-1,719

+220

+299

+67

-1,855

-796

-85

+665

+531

CHANGE

642

601

784

1,095

31

922

-39

1,166

823

29

1,250

24

1,916

33

1,285

48

49

35

146

27

1,431

977

58

1,055

1,110

992

28

583

856

880

596

INFLOW

 834

 832

 818

 785

 754

 752

 751

 743

 749

 747

 778

 786

 771

 649

 263

 247

 245

 237

 352

 866

 918

 921

 919

 937

 954

 949

 955

 975

 891

 538

 324

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 10

 6

 7

 8

 7

 7

 10

 9

 9

 8

 7

 8

 9

 8

 12

 6

 8

 8

 7

 8

 10

 10

 6

 7

 5

 9

 8

 9

 8

 7

 4

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 11/24/2003

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -6,057 19,433 22,240 0 0 245

ACRE-FEET -6,057 38,545 44,113 0 0 486

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 44,113

SPILL 0 44,113

 62,119

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 562

 466

 703

 969

 0

 772

 0

 1,061

 722

 0

 1,144

 0

 1,772

 0

 1,157

 14

 3

 2

 9

 0

 1,318

 889

 22

 909

 1,017

 945

 0

 613

 962

 962

 668

 17,661

 35,031

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
ANTONELLI 

·--LAW·~.-~~ 

'' Drone/VAS Practice Group ..._ ',;,. ·,; ... 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

<·~~',~.c.: 

Re: Amendment to Frontier Geospatial, LLC 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-7057-0001 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I -, I _:; 

35 E Wacker Drive 

Suite 1875 

Chicago, IL 60601 

Tel. 312201.8310 

Jeffrey@Antonelli-Law .com 

March 31,2016 

We are writing regarding the address of our client, Frontier Geospatial, LLC. The new full 

address of our client is now: 

841 E Olmstead Ave 

Evansville, IN 4 7711 

We request that you update this Petition for Exemption, under Docket No. FAA-2015-

7057-0001, to reflect the new location. 

If we can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us at 312-

201-8310 or via email at Jeffrev@Antonelli-Law.com. 

1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 699

 631

 771

 853

 884

 880

 888

 887

 862

 847

 833

 840

 800

 753

 782

 776

 757

 805

 799

 554

 527

 576

 622

 637

 686

 722

 735

 732

 718

 705

 712

 565

 558

 640

 779

 856

 860

 878

 864

 843

 827

 824

 805

 758

 739

 744

 725

 733

 767

 552

 529

 502

 512

 559

 591

 613

 659

 696

 706

 692

 675

 680

 631

 587

 716

 827

 873

 870

 883

 880

 848

 837

 829

 828

 785

 745

 766

 756

 743

 790

 643

 541

 515

 552

 598

 614

 648

 683

 714

 717

 704

 687

 697

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

UNION ISLAND ON OLD RIVER AT MIDDLE RIVER
#### § 802.216 [Reserved]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 43369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18287]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7530]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Kyrgyzstan

    Pursuant to Section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, 
Pub. L. 111-117) as carried forward under the Department of Defense and 
Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, 2011 (Pub. L. 112-10) (``the 
Act''), and Department of State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I 
hereby determine that it is important to the national interest of the 
United States to waive the requirements of Section 7086(c)(1) of the 
Act with respect Kyrgyzstan and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 6, 2011.
 Thomas Nides,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2011-18287 Filed 7-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.86

 130.88

 130.78

 130.80

 130.76

 130.63

 130.61

 130.56

 130.66

 130.78

 130.64

 130.77

 130.70

 130.67

 130.68

 130.60

 130.76

 130.85

 130.85

 130.73

 130.75

 130.71

 130.81

 130.71

 130.60

 130.92

 130.77

 130.84

 130.78

 130.85

 130.85

 674

 676

 665

 667

 663

 648

 645

 640

 651

 665

 649

 664

 656

 652

 654

 644

 663

 673

 673

 659

 662

 657

 668

 657

 644

 680

 664

 671

 665

 673

 673

STORAGE

-4

+2

-11

+2

-4

-15

-3

-5

+11

+14

-16

+15

-8

-4

+2

-10

+19

+10

+0

-14

+3

-5

+11

-11

-13

+36

-16

+7

-6

+8

+0

CHANGE

494

503

509

508

492

474

484

505

514

508

499

497

491

490

502

516

518

525

529

501

462

469

501

538

564

572

548

537

536

545

517

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 452

 458

 471

 463

 450

 437

 442

 464

 464

 457

 463

 445

 451

 447

 456

 476

 464

 476

 485

 464

 416

 428

 451

 499

 527

 509

 512

 488

 494

 496

 473

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

C.F.S.

 .40

 .36

 .42

 .31

 .39

 .46

 .34

 .38

 .33

 .32

 .37

 .39

 .38

 .49

 .45

 .45

 .40

 .39

 .40

 .42

 .37

 .27

 .42

 .51

 .39

 .44

 .42

 .42

 .44

 .43

 .39

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JULY 2019 RUN DATE: 08/01/2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -5 15,848 14,478 1,333 40 12.35 .00

ACRE-FEET -5 31,435 28,717 2,644 79

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,644

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 28,717

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2019 .00

 678

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 40.68
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 183

 181

 185

 190

 193

 190

 192

 200

 204

 216

 214

 226

 210

 194

 186

 189

 177

 160

 164

 173

 163

 156

 149

 158

 165

 160

 162

 155

 153

 158

 171

 170

 173

 179

 181

 183

 184

 189

 189

 196

 200

 196

 195

 175

 177

 162

 146

 140

 138

 137

 139

 133

 137

 138

 142

 141

 142

 139

 140

 144

 177

 174

 179

 184

 187

 187

 188

 194

 196

 205

 208

 208

 203

 187

 181

 177

 160

 150

 145

 145

 147

 145

 142

 144

 150

 152

 153

 146

 145

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
S1()-1()()316-()2S 

Gnnd Junction Area 

Ci^tff^e^— 

"Your thalness ConnecHon" 

March 8,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Doclcet DOT-OST-201 O^^Bl* 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

The Grand Junction, Colorado Area Chamber of Commerce is supporting the application for 

antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to compete 

effectively with the Star and Sky Team alliance. This increased interalliance competition will in 

turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy - first by solidifying U.S.-Japan 

Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further liberalization across Asia. 

From the local business community perspective we find that our businesses are increasingly 

doing business across the globe with customers worldwide. That, in turn, results in the need for 

seamless, accessible and affordable international air service. We think approval of this 

application would enable those oneworld alliance airlines to deliver highly competitive air 

transportation services that will benefit Grand Junction Chamber members. 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Diane Schwenke 

President CEO 

Grand Junction Area Chamber 

360 Grand Avenue 

Grand Junction, CO 81501 

diane@gjchamber.org