See response to comment FA1-1.

INDIVIDUALSIND707 – Robert Rutkowski

IND707-1

Sensitive resources, as well as potential imare discussed in the EIS for interior forest waterbodies (section 4.3.3), steep slopes (

4.1.3; appendix G), shallow bedrock (sectappendix I), wetlands (section 4.4 and app(section 4.6.2.3), endangered species (sect(section 4.11.1), and farmland/agriculture 4.8.4 and appendix J). See the response to regarding safety.

IND707-2

S-2264
See the response to comment LA5-5 regar

the existing compressor station. See the rSA6-1 regarding climate change. See the regarding water well testing.

INDIVIDUALSIND707 – Robert Rutkowski (cont’d)

IND707-3

Impacts from construction and operation omodifications to the existing Wright Comdiscussed in section 4.11.1 of the EIS. Secomment CO38-5.

IND707-5

IND707-4 See the response to comment LA7-5 rega

response to comment CO41-23 regarding Section 3.1.2.3 of the EIS provides a discenergy.

IND707-6 See the response to comment IND474-1 r

S-2265
See response to comment FA1-1 regardin

comment period. See the response to FAConstitution’s Preliminary Migratory BirPlan

INDIVIDUALSIND708 – Brendan Guastella

IND708-1

S-2266
The commentor’s request to delay the pro

See the response to comment LA1-4 and hydraulic fracturing. 

INDIVIDUALSIND709 – Charlie Silberman

IND709-1

S-2267
The commentor’s opposition to the propo

See the response to comments CO1-1 and impacts. 

INDIVIDUALSIND710 – Gloria Foster

IND710-1

S-2268
The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

INDIVIDUALSIND711 – John Lawrence

IND711-1

S-2269
INDIVIDUALS

IND711 – John Lawrence (cont’d)

S-2270
The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

INDIVIDUALSIND712 – Edward A. Bordinger

IND712-1

S-2271
INDIVIDUALS

IND712 – Edward A. Bordinger (cont’d)

S-2272
Our assessment of this parcel can be foun

the EIS where we recommended that Conroute variation. 

INDIVIDUALSIND713 – Angelo Santoro

IND713-1

IND713-2 See the response to comment FA8-3 rega

negotiations and eminent domain. The coregarding Constitution’s land agents are n

IND713-3 Our assessment of this parcel can be foun

the EIS. 

IND713-4 See the response to comment LA1-1 regaIND713-5 See the response to comment LA5-3 rega

mortgages, and insurance. See the responregarding eminent domain.

S-2273
INDIVIDUALS

IND713 – Angelo Santoro (cont’d)

S-2274
See the response to comment IND515-3.

INDIVIDUALSIND714 – Robert Ashley

IND714-1IND714-2 See the response to comment FA8-3 regar

See the response to comment LA7-5 rega

S-2275
INDIVIDUALS

IND714 – Robert Ashley (cont’d)

S-2276
INDIVIDUALS

IND714 – Robert Ashley (cont’d)

S-2277
INDIVIDUALS

IND714 – Robert Ashley (cont’d)

S-2278
INDIVIDUALS

IND714 – Robert Ashley (cont’d)

S-2279
See the response to comment LA10-26 reg

equipment crossings. See the response to regarding liability during an incident.

INDIVIDUALSIND715 – Jean D Bizot

IND715-1

S-2280
See the response to comment IND505-9 r

for hunting. 

INDIVIDUALSIND715 – Jean D Bizot (cont’d)

IND715-2IND715-3 See the response to comment IND292-2 r

cover.

IND715-4 See the response to comment LA4-2 rega

the response to comment LA5-3 regarding 

IND715-5 See the response to comment IND297-3 r

lands.

IND715-6 See the response to comment LA10-26 re

equipment crossings. 

S-2281
See the response to comment LA1-4 regar

fracturing.

INDIVIDUALSIND715 – Jean D Bizot (cont’d)

IND715-7IND715-8 See the response to comment IND13-3 re

response to comment CO47-1 regarding WSee the response to comment LA1-6 regaservices.

IND715-9 See the response to comment CO39-3.

S-2282
Landowners may negotiate with Constitu

on current or future quarries.

INDIVIDUALSIND715 – Jean D Bizot (cont’d)

IND715-10IND715-11 See the response to comment LA5-3 rega

insurance.

IND715-13 The commentor’s opposition to the propoIND715-12 The commentor’s statements regarding ea

eminent domain are noted.

S-2283
INDIVIDUALS

IND715 – Jean D Bizot (cont’d)

S-2284
See the response to comment LA1-4 and F

hydraulic fracturing.

INDIVIDUALSIND716 – Sean Glennon

IND716-1IND716-2 The EIS discusses impacts on recreation iIND716-3 See the response to comment CO1-2

IND716-4 Constitution would implement measures t

mitigate any anticipated adverse effects oaboveground resources as part of the ongowith section 106 of the National Historic 

IND716-5 See the response to comments LA1-4 and 

hydraulic fracturing. See the response to regarding jobs. See the response to the coregarding traffic. See the response to comroad repairs.

S-2285
INDIVIDUALS

IND716 – Sean Glennon (cont’d)

S-2286
INDIVIDUALS

IND716 – Sean Glennon (cont’d)

S-2287
See the response to comment CO16-22 re

the response to comment LA4-2 regarding 

INDIVIDUALSIND717 – Michelle Fiore

IND717-1

S-2288
See the response to comment IND13-3 re

INDIVIDUALSIND717 – Michelle Fiore (cont’d)

IND717-2

S-2289
The commentor’s statements regarding C

representatives and the FERC are noted. 

INDIVIDUALSIND717 – Michelle Fiore (cont’d)

IND717-3

IND717-4 The commentor’s statements regarding C

Community Grant program are noted. Secomment CO50-108 regarding the commcommentor’s statement regarding an ease

S-2290
INDIVIDUALS

IND717 – Michelle Fiore (cont’d)

S-2291
See response to comment FA1-1.

INDIVIDUALSIND718 – Nick Albaugh

IND718-1

IND718-2

IND718-3

IND718-4

See the response to comment LA7-5 regar

See the response to comment FA8-3 regar

The commentor’s statements regarding bothe response to comment CO50-108 regarmeetings.

S-2292
INDIVIDUALS

IND718 – Nick Albaugh (cont’d)

S-2293
INDIVIDUALS

IND718 – Nick Albaugh (cont’d)

S-2294
The commentor’s request to route the pro

of Schoharie County is noted. See the resLA1-4 and FA4-45 regarding hydraulic fr

INDIVIDUALSIND719 – Mary T. Townsend

IND719-1

S-2295
See the response to comment IND11-1 re

See the response to comment CO50-98 re

INDIVIDUALSIND719 – Mary T. Townsend (cont’d)

IND719-2

S-2296
INDIVIDUALS

IND720 – Matthew Stetter

IND720-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2297
The commentor’s opposition is noted. Se

comment CO1-2 regarding impacts. See comment CO16-3 regarding spills. 

INDIVIDUALSIND721 – Luis Calleja

IND721-1

S-2298
The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

INDIVIDUALSIND722 – Claude B. Holbrook

IND722-1

IND722-2 Compensation for easements is discussed 

EIS.

S-2299
INDIVIDUALS

IND722 – Claude B. Holbrook (cont’d)

S-2300
The commentor’s statements in opposition 

projects are noted.

INDIVIDUALSIND723 – Margaret D. Davis

IND723-1

S-2301
Section 3.1.2.3 of the EIS provides a disc

energy.

INDIVIDUALSIND723 – Margaret D. Davis (cont’d)

IND723-2

S-2302
The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

INDIVIDUALSIND724 – Christine Amos

IND724-1

S-2303
The commentor’s support of the proposed 

Compensation for easements is discussed EIS. See the response to comment LA5-3 values. See the response to comment FAdomain.

INDIVIDUALSIND725 – Hilda Holbrook

IND725-1

S-2304
INDIVIDUALS

IND725 – Hilda Holbrook (cont’d)

S-2305
See the response to comment LA5-3 rega

mortgages, and insurance.

INDIVIDUALSIND726 – Howard Hannum

IND726-1

S-2306
INDIVIDUALS

IND726 – Howard Hannum (cont’d)

S-2307
The commentor’s statements regarding th

INDIVIDUALSIND727 – Glenn Sanders

IND727-1

IND727-2 Section 3.1.2.3 of the EIS has been revise

of small scale solar projects as an alternat

S-2308
INDIVIDUALS

IND727 – Glenn Sanders (cont’d)

S-2309
Air quality is discussed in section 4.11.1 

INDIVIDUALSIND728 – Individual

IND728-1

S-2310
See the response to comments CO1-1 and 

environmental impacts.

INDIVIDUALSIND729 – Marcus Villagran

IND729-1IND729-2 Section 3.1.2.3 of the EIS provides a disc

energy.

S-2311
The commentor’s statements regarding th

The page numbers can be found centered page. We did not have the same trouble windicated by the commentor.

INDIVIDUALSIND730 – Mary Flinneran

IND730-1

The proposed projects would transport naSusquehanna County, Pennsylvania to W

IND730-2

IND730-3

IND730-4

See the response to comment SA6-1 regaand comment SA6-1 and SA6-4 regardin

See the response to comment LA1-4 regafracturing. Sensitive resources, as well as mitigation, are discussed in the EIS for so

S-2312
See the response to comment SA6-1 rega

and comment SA6-1 and SA6-4 regardin

INDIVIDUALSIND730 – Mary Flinneran (cont’d)

IND730-5IND730-6

IND730-7

The Constitution pipeline project has not construction (or welding) on the project hConstitution stated in its Application (Re1.3.1.7 that “Only welders qualified accoANSI, ASME, and American Petroleum will be permitted to perform the welding. approved welding inspector will conduct testing and document all test results. A wacceptance criteria of the Williams CompQualification Test will be disqualified. Bcoating in the field will comply with USDCFR Part 192).”As stated in section 4.12 of the EIS, 100 pwould be inspected using a non-destructiradiographic or ultrasonic inspections to structural integrity and compliance with tregulations. Those welds that do not meespecifications would be repaired or replacapproved, the welded joints would be coacoating to prevent corrosion and the entirvisually inspected for any faults, scratchedefects. Any damage would be repaired installed. After welding and lowering-in would be inspected with pigs (inspection 

filled with water under pressure and hydrensure the integrity of the welds. Typicajoints would be accomplished on-site follthereby preventing the need for truck transections. Some prefabrication of mainlin

components could occur, but these composubjected to the same examination and temain pipeline. The number of tie-ins thanot known, but typically is associated wit

waterbodies, roads, and other special feat

Iroquois has successfully used a mixture ofor hydrostatic testing on their Market Ac002) and 08/09 Expansion project (CP07-to comment IND622-1. 

S-2313
See the response to comment IND622-1 r

Iroquois’ pipeline. The commentor’s statdraft EIS are noted.

INDIVIDUALSIND731 – Dianne Sefcik

IND731-1

IND731-2 See the response to comment LA7-5 rega

S-2314
INDIVIDUALS

IND731 – Dianne Sefcik (cont’d)

See the response to comment IND248-6 aSee also the response to comment IND13

IND731-3

S-2315
INDIVIDUALS

IND731 – Dianne Sefcik (cont’d)

See the response to comment LA1-4 and Fhydraulic fracturing.

IND731-4

S-2316
INDIVIDUALS

IND732 – Devon Smida

IND732-1 See the response to comment IND13-3 regIND732-2 See the responses to comment CO21 rega

school.

S-2317
INDIVIDUALS

IND732 – Devon Smida (cont’d)

S-2318
INDIVIDUALS

IND732 – Devon Smida (cont’d)

S-2319
INDIVIDUALS

IND733 – Don Airey

See the response to comment LA1-4 and Fhydraulic fracturing. The commentor’s stintimidation are noted.

IND733-1

S-2320
INDIVIDUALS

IND733 – Don Airey (cont’d)

The commentor’s statements regarding thprogram are noted. See the response to coregarding eminent domain.

IND733-2IND733-3 The commentor’s statements of oppositio

staff conducts an impartial, independent rdocumentation provided by both Applicanprojects. 

S-2321
INDIVIDUALS

IND733 – Don Airey (cont’d)

S-2322
INDIVIDUALS

IND734 – Jennifer Colon

IND734-1 The commentor’s statements in support of 

are noted.

S-2323
INDIVIDUALS

IND735 – Earl W. Collay

IND735-1 The commentor’s statements in support of 

are noted.

S-2324
INDIVIDUALS

IND735 – Earl W. Collay (cont’d) 

S-2325
INDIVIDUALS

IND735 – Earl W. Collay (cont’d) 

S-2326
INDIVIDUALS

IND735 – Earl W. Collay (cont’d)

S-2327
INDIVIDUALS

IND735 – Earl W. Collay (cont’d)

S-2328
INDIVIDUALS

IND735 – Earl W. Collay (cont’d)

S-2329
INDIVIDUALS

IND735 – Earl W. Collay (cont’d)

S-2330
INDIVIDUALS

IND736 – Steven Edward Connors

IND736-1 See response to comment IND13-3 and co

regarding safety.

S-2331
INDIVIDUALS

IND736 – Steven Edward Connors (cont’d)

IND736-2 See the response to comment LA5-3 rega

commentor’s opposition is noted.

S-2332
INDIVIDUALS

IND737 – Claude Crispell

IND737-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2333
INDIVIDUALS

IND737 – Claude Crispell (cont’d)

S-2334
INDIVIDUALS

IND737 – Claude Crispell (cont’d)

S-2335
INDIVIDUALS

IND737 – Claude Crispell (cont’d)

S-2336
INDIVIDUALS

IND737 – Claude Crispell (cont’d)

S-2337
INDIVIDUALS

IND737 – Claude Crispell (cont’d)

S-2338
INDIVIDUALS

IND737 – Claude Crispell (cont’d)

S-2339
INDIVIDUALS

IND738 – Bruce and Michele Stacey

IND738-1 Section 4.2.4 of the EIS provides a discus

mitigation measures which would minimimitigation measures include replacement stone removal, and compliance with re-serecommendations.

IND738-2IND738-3IND738-4

See the response to comment IND113-1 rImpacts from blasting would be localizedcomments CO30-1 and IND110-6 regardiSee the response to comment IND163-1 rheaving. See the response to comment FAand slope breakers. 

S-2340
INDIVIDUALS

IND738 – Bruce and Michele Stacey (cont’d)

IND738-5 The commentor’s statements regarding aq

the response to comment CO41-15.

IND738-6

IND738-7IND738-8

See the response to comment FA4-24 regtesting. The hydrostatic test water would chemicals.

HDD crossings would be used in both PeYork. The appropriate agencies for each of any inadvertent releases of drilling mu

See the response to comment LA1-6 regaservices. The commentor’s statements reinsurance are noted.

S-2341
INDIVIDUALS

IND738 – Bruce and Michele Stacey (cont’d)

IND738-9 See the response to comment LA1-6 rega

services. See the response to comment L

wells.

IND738-10

IND738-11IND738-13

Section 4.9.6 of the EIS has been revised insurance.

See the response to comment LA5-3 regarinsurance, and mortgages.As stated in section 4.9.6 of the EIS, we ccompanies. Most were not able to commetherefore we were unable to report our con

IND738-12

The commentor’s request for safety inspecnoted. As stated in section 4.12 of the EISPart 192.911 require inspection of the pipe

IND738-14 Section 4.12 and table 4.12.1-2 are provid

pipeline incidents which are defined as thinjury requiring hospitalization or involve more than $110,660 dollars. The commennoted. 

S-2342
INDIVIDUALS

IND739 – Michael Dundon

IND739-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2343
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas

IND740-1 The commentor’s statements regarding un

noted.

S-2344
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas (cont’d)

S-2345
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas (cont’d)

S-2346
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas (cont’d)

S-2347
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas (cont’d)

S-2348
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas (cont’d)

S-2349
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas (cont’d)

S-2350
INDIVIDUALS

IND740 – J. Alghauskas (cont’d)

S-2351
INDIVIDUALS

IND741 – Anthony Baroni

IND741-1 The commentor’s statements regarding ne

Constitution are noted.

S-2352
INDIVIDUALS

IND741 – Anthony Baroni (cont’d)

IND741-2 The EIS is prepared by the FERC staff an

contractor. See the response to comment third-party contractors.

IND741-3

IND741-4

See the response to comment IND733-3. 

Our assessment of this parcel can be founthe EIS. Based on our analysis, we could route crossing for this parcel that was preroute. See the response to comment PM2to comment FA4-3 regarding source inforwere denied survey permission. 

S-2353
INDIVIDUALS

IND741 – Anthony Baroni (cont’d)

IND741-5 It is against the FERC policy to release th

landowners. See section 3.4.3.2 of the EIlandowners that requested changes to the See the response to comment FA8-3 regar

IND741-6IND741-7

See the response to comment LA7-5 rega

The commentor’s opposition to the propo

S-2354
INDIVIDUALS

IND742 – Ronald H. Bailey

IND742-1 See the responses to comment letter LA1.

IND742-2 See the response to comment LA1-1 rega

S-2355
INDIVIDUALS

IND742 – Ronald H. Bailey (cont’d)

S-2356
INDIVIDUALS

IND743 – Lisa Barr

IND743-1 See the response to comment LA1-1 rega

stated in section 2.2.4 of the EIS, modificroads could include installation of culvertnew access roads would be constructed.

See the response to comment FA1-1 regarcomment period.

IND743-3

See the response to comment LA1-4 and hydraulic fracturing.

IND743-2

S-2357
INDIVIDUALS

IND743 – Lisa Barr (cont’d)

IND743-4 See the response to comment IND743-1 a

culverts and erosion. See the response to regarding flooding.

See the response to comment CO50-108 rmeetings.

IND743-5

S-2358
INDIVIDUALS

IND743 – Lisa Barr (cont’d)

S-2359
INDIVIDUALS

IND744 – Stephen E. Barton

IND744-1 The commentor’s statement regarding the 

pipeline is noted. 

S-2360
INDIVIDUALS

IND745 – Walter H. Bray

IND745-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2361
INDIVIDUALS

IND746 – Lois Chernin

IND746-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2362
INDIVIDUALS

IND746 – Lois Chernin (cont’d)

S-2363
INDIVIDUALS

IND746 – Lois Chernin (cont’d)

S-2364
INDIVIDUALS

IND747 – Francis J. Coney

IND747-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2365
INDIVIDUALS

IND748 – Rhonda Coullet

IND748-1 See the response to comment LA1-4 and F

hydraulic fracturing. See the response to regarding road repairs.

S-2366
INDIVIDUALS

IND749 – Matt Walker

IND749-1 See the response to comment CO41-29 re

Central Compressor Station.

S-2367
INDIVIDUALS

IND749 – Matt Walker (cont’d)

IND749-2 See the response to comment LA1-4 and F

hydraulic fracturing. See the response to regarding climate change and greenhouse 

S-2368
INDIVIDUALS

IND749 – Matt Walker (cont’d)

S-2369
INDIVIDUALS

IND750 – Blane Pixley

IND750-1 See the response to comment CO43-8 reg

corridors. 

IND750-2 See the response to comment LA7-5 rega

commentor’s opposition to the proposed pthe response to comments CO1-1 and COenvironmental impacts.

S-2370
INDIVIDUALS

IND750 – Blane Pixley (cont’d)

S-2371
INDIVIDUALS

IND751 – Keith Schue

IND751-4

See the response to comment SA6-9 regaremissions.

IND751-2IND751-3

IND751-1 See the response to comment LA1-4 and F

hydraulic fracturing.See the response to comment LA7-5 regarand export.

See the response to comment CO43-8 rega

S-2372
INDIVIDUALS

IND752 – Kris Stafford

IND752-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2373
INDIVIDUALS

IND752 – Kris Stafford (cont’d)

S-2374
INDIVIDUALS

IND753 – Glenn Sanders

IND753-1 See the response to comment IND727-2 r

S-2375
INDIVIDUALS

IND753 – Glenn Sanders (cont’d)

IND753-2 See the response to comment IND21-17 r

emissions.

S-2376
INDIVIDUALS

IND754 – Sharon Corey

IND754-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2377
INDIVIDUALS

IND755 – Chris Lange

IND755-1 See the response to comment IND55-1.

S-2378
INDIVIDUALS

IND756 – Christina Frye

IND756-1 See the response to comment CO50-108 r

meetings.

S-2379
INDIVIDUALS

IND757 – Hoyt Emmons

IND757-1 The commentor’s statements in support o

are noted.

S-2380
INDIVIDUALS

IND758 – Mike Grossman

IND758-1

IND758-2 See the response to comment LA1-1 regaIND758-3IND758-4

See the response to comment IND53-1 reSee the response to comment LA5-3 regaSee the response to comment CO45-1 regBluestone Pipeline.

S-2381
INDIVIDUALS

IND758 – Mike Grossman (cont’d)

S-2382
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley

IND759-1 See the response to comment CO41-53.

S-2383
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

S-2384
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

IND759-2 See the response to comment CO41-54.

S-2385
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

IND759-3 See the response to comment CO41-56.

S-2386
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

IND759-4 See the response to comment CO41-57 an

S-2387
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

IND759-5 See the response to comment CO41-60.

S-2388
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

IND759-6 See the response to comment CO41-63, c

comment CO41-65.

S-2389
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

S-2390
INDIVIDUALS

IND759 – Kevin Heatley (cont’d)

IND759-7 See the response to comment FA1-1.

S-2391
INDIVIDUALS

IND760 – Justin Hughes

IND760-1 Section 3.2.1 of the EIS provides a discus

transport the gas. Transportation by railrosimilar number of daily and annual rail tri

S-2392
INDIVIDUALS

IND761 – Julie Huntsman

IND761-1 See response to comment FA1-1.

IND761-2

IND761-3IND761-4

See the response to comment LA7-5 regarSee the response to comment LA1-4 and Fhydraulic fracturing. See the response to regarding radon.

The commentor’s statements regarding jo

S-2393
INDIVIDUALS

IND761 – Julie Huntsman (cont’d)

IND761-5 See the response to comment LA9-4 rega

reserves. See the response to comment INprices.

S-2394
INDIVIDUALS

IND762 – Susan Jacques

IND762-1 The commentor’s statements are noted. S

comment CO50-108 regarding the comme

S-2395
INDIVIDUALS

IND763 – Marion J. Karl

IND763-1 See the response to comment SA6-1 regar

See the responses to comments CO26-19 

See the response to comment LA5-3 regainsurance, and mortgages. See the responregarding property taxes.

IND763-2IND763-3

S-2396
INDIVIDUALS

IND763 – Marion J. Karl (cont’d)

IND763-4 See the response to comment FA4-45 reg

fracturing.

See the response to comment IND54-1 regpipe. The commentor’s opposition to the propo

IND763-5

IND763-6

S-2397
INDIVIDUALS

IND764 – Jennie Kerwood

IND764-1 See the responses to comment CO21 rega

school.

S-2398
INDIVIDUALS

IND765 – Gabriella Leach

IND765-1 The commentor’s statements regarding th

noted. Our assessment of this parcel can b3.4.3.2 of the EIS.

S-2399
INDIVIDUALS

IND766 – Robert Grajewski

IND766-1 The commentor’s statements regarding fo

responses to comments FA4-29 and FA4-forest mitigation plan. The discussion of 4.5.3 of the EIS has been revised. 

S-2400
See the response to comment LA5-3 rega

INDIVIDUALSIND767 – Philip Hulbert

IND767-1

S-2401
INDIVIDUALS

IND767 – Philip Hulbert (cont’d)

S-2402
The commentor’s statements requesting in

noted. The Commission will make a detegrant a party’s intervention status. The coadded to the distribution list as an interve

INDIVIDUALSIND768 – Kenneth Stanton

IND768-1

S-2403
The information filed regarding additiona

and purpose, and global warming is notedwe have updated sections 1.1 and 4.13 wi

INDIVIDUALSIND769 – Anne Marie Garti

IND769-1

S-2404
The commentor’s opposition and vascular 

Our assessment of this parcel can be founthe EIS. 

INDIVIDUALSIND770 – Richard Friedberg

IND770-1

S-2405
The commentor’s statements regarding no

alternative routes are noted.

INDIVIDUALSIND770 – Richard Friedberg (cont’d)

IND770-2

S-2406
INDIVIDUALS

IND770 – Richard Friedberg (cont’d)

S-2407
The commentor’s objection to the route v

assessment of this alternative route can b3.4.3.2 of the EIS where we recommendeadopt a minor route variation.

INDIVIDUALSIND771 – Kenneth Stanton

IND771-1

S-2408
The commentor’s opposition to the propo

See the response to comment IND13-3 anEIS regarding safety. See the response to regarding the propane line incidents. 

INDIVIDUALSIND772 – Tracy l. Briggs

IND772-1IND772-2 Sensitive resources as well as potential im

are discussed in the EIS for wildlife in secBald eagles are discussed in section 4.7.3 Constitution has indicated that it is consulthe NYSDEC to determine if blasting witheagle nests would present a significant imaddition, Constitution is developing a mitipotential blasting in the vicinity of bald eaprovided to the FWS for review and concurecommended that prior to construction Cbald eagle mitigation plan, developed in cresource agencies including the FWS. 

S-2409
INDIVIDUALS

IND772 – Tracy l. Briggs (cont’d)

IND772-3 See the response to comment FA4-45 reg

fracturing.

S-2410
INDIVIDUALS

IND772 – Tracy l. Briggs (cont’d)

IND772-4 Potential visual impacts on the region are 

4.8.6 of the EIS. Sensitive resources, as w

and mitigation, are discussed in the EIS fo(section 4.5.3), waterbodies (section 4.3.3

2.3.2, and 4.1.3; appendix G), wetlands (sL), and farmland/agriculture (sections 2.3appendix J). Constitution would be requirtopographic contours following constructierosion controls would be installed as desto comment CO1-4. See the response to cregarding blasting. 

IND772-5 See the response to comment FA8-3 regar

See the response to comment LA7-5 regaenergy sources, including renewable soursection 3.1 of the EIS. 

S-2411
INDIVIDUALS

IND772 – Tracy l. Briggs (cont’d)

S-2412
INDIVIDUALS

IND773 – Vincent Montone

IND773-1 The commentor’s statements in support of 

are noted.

S-2413
INDIVIDUALS

IND774 – Dennis and Deborah McNamee

IND774-1 See section 3.4.3 of the EIS for an assessm

Based on our analysis, we could not identcrossing for this parcel that was preferabl

IND774-6

IND774-8

IND774-7IND774-9

IND774-3

IND774-2

IND774-4

IND774-5

See the response to CO17-2 regarding no

and landowners. We note that the landowincluded in the landowner list provided to by Constitution.

The commentor’s statements regarding Wconduct are noted.

See section 3.4.3 of the EIS for an assessmSafety of the proposed projects is discusseEIS. See the response to CO47-1 regarding our safety record.

See the response to FA8-3 regarding eminSee the response to CO26-18 regarding thcomment regarding the existing Bluestone The commentor’s statements are noted.

S-2414