alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 446.00

 445.85

 445.81

 445.76

 445.72

 445.55

 445.35

 445.38

 445.25

 444.96

 444.76

 444.59

 444.53

 444.49

 444.61

 444.61

 444.71

 444.98

 445.24

 445.50

 445.70

 445.95

 446.11

 445.78

 445.62

 445.45

 445.30

 445.46

 445.86

 446.05

 932,879

 931,413

 931,022

 930,533

 930,143

 928,482

 926,530

 926,823

 925,555

 922,728

 920,780

 919,125

 918,541

 918,152

 919,320

 919,320

 920,293

 922,923

 925,457

 927,994

 929,947

 932,390

 933,955

 930,729

 929,166

 927,506

 926,042

 927,604

 931,511

 933,368

STORAGE

-489

-1,466

-391

-489

-390

-1,661

-1,952

+293

-1,268

-2,827

-1,948

-1,655

-584

-389

+1,168

+0

+973

+2,630

+2,534

+2,537

+1,953

+2,443

+1,565

-3,226

-1,563

-1,660

-1,464

+1,562

+3,907

+1,857

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

794

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,091

0

992

1,487

1,487

1,587

1,185

1,580

691

0

0

0

0

1,388

2,275

988

PUMPING

 0

 600

 0

 0

 0

 679

 825

 0

 600

 1,275

 750

 596

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,807

 563

 600

 599

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 146

 113

 95

 108

 118

 102

 102

 117

 104

 103

 105

 92

 94

 112

 101

 95

 92

 90

 92

 97

 96

 96

 97

 96

 95

 95

 95

 97

 100

 100

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-100

-26

-102

-138

-79

-56

-57

-529

+65

-47

-127

-146

-200

-84

-401

+95

-409

-72

-117

-210

-104

-253

+195

+276

-131

-142

-44

-504

-205

+48

OR

 52

 47

 73

 70

 47

 79

 85

 50

 41

 38

 32

 32

 41

 38

 13

 41

 35

 79

 41

 47

 47

 41

 16

 32

 51

 47

 41

 35

 73

 19

C.F.S.

 .17

 .15

 .23

 .22

 .15

 .25

 .27

 .16

 .13

 .12

 .10

 .10

 .13

 .12

 .04

 .13

 .11

 .25

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .13

 .05

 .10

 .16

 .15

 .13

 .11

 .23

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .01

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR January 21, 2021

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2020 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +0 15,545 8,894 3,045 0 -3,604 1,383 4.38 .19

ACRE-FEET + 30,834 17,641 6,040 0 -7,149 2,743

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 17,641

PACHECO TUNNEL 6,040 TOTAL 23,681

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE = .19

 933,368

SPILL 0 .19

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = .19
(No. 905

Claimant awarded $250.00.)

#### Frank Brawner, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 1, 1925.*

Respondeat superior — State *not liable.*While the State is not liable for the torts or negligence of its employees, an award may be made to claimant for damages caused by the negligence of an employee of the State.

L. H. Vogel, for claimant.

Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General ; Frank R. Eagleton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Mr. Justice Leech

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is a claim for damages sustained to the automobile of claimant, by reason of collision with an automobile owned by the State of Illinois, in the Highway Department of said State and being driven by one Fred Little, an employee and servant of the said Highway Department and of the State of Illinois, said automobile so driven by Fred Little being driven *195recklessly and in violation of an ordinance of the city of Springfield; damages to claimant’s car amounting to $250.

Statement filed by the Attorney General of the State of Illinois, recites that said claim has been investigated by the Department of Public Works and Buildings and said department reported that it was equitable and just to the extent and for the amount as submitted to this court on behalf of claimant.

We accordingly award claimant the sum of $250.00, on the grounds of social justice and equity.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Estimates of the size andcharacteristics of the resident nonimmigrant population in the United States.
 
2011 | 2012 | 2014
 
SuDoc Number:HS 1.15/2:N 73/
Item Number:0520-B-50 (online)
CGP System Number:001026560
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 22, 2017********
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       17
June 2023

STORAGE 1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION** PRECIP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW

C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

1,268.9

1 2,283.65 1,277.9 9.1 5,954 1,300 0 0 91 0.29 0.00

2 2,284.48 1,286.8 8.9 5,558 957 0 0 120 0.38 0.00

3 2,285.28 1,295.4 8.6 5,403 997 0 0 64 0.20 0.00

4 2,286.21 1,305.5 10.1 5,991 816 0 0 96 0.30 0.00

5 2,287.15 1,315.8 10.2 5,904 636 0 0 100 0.31 0.00

6 2,288.08 1,326.0 10.2 5,903 686 0 0 71 0.22 0.24

7 2,288.92 1,335.2 9.3 5,216 474 0 0 65 0.20 0.00

8 2,290.01 1,347.4 12.1 6,905 748 0 0 49 0.15 0.00

9 2,290.77 1,355.9 8.5 4,904 550 0 0 66 0.20 0.07

10 2,291.47 1,363.7 7.9 4,693 645 0 0 83 0.25 0.00

11 2,292.08 1,370.6 6.9 4,135 584 0 0 86 0.26 0.00

12 2,292.70 1,377.6 7.0 4,145 540 0 2 63 0.19 0.06

13 2,293.28 1,384.2 6.6 3,985 567 0 0 97 0.29 0.00

14 2,293.78 1,389.9 5.7 3,696 700 0 0 124 0.37 0.00

15 2,294.18 1,394.5 4.6 2,888 487 0 0 98 0.29 0.00

16 2,294.55 1,398.7 4.2 2,713 464 0 0 111 0.33 0.00

17 2,294.89 1,402.6 3.9 2,470 405 0 0 101 0.30 0.00

18 2,295.16 1,405.7 3.1 2,115 428 0 0 122 0.36 0.00

19 2,295.35 1,407.9 2.2 1,828 643 0 0 81 0.24 0.00

20 2,295.51 1,409.8 1.8 1,805 800 0 0 75 0.22 0.00

21 2,295.70 1,411.9 2.2 1,656 467 0 0 85 0.25 0.00

22 2,295.79 1,413.0 1.0 1,672 1,027 0 0 122 0.36 0.00

23 2,296.01 1,415.5 2.5 1,941 580 0 0 82 0.24 0.00

24 2,296.20 1,417.7 2.2 1,838 645 0 0 82 0.24 0.00

25 2,296.36 1,419.6 1.9 1,800 797 0 0 68 0.20 0.00

26 2,296.55 1,421.8 2.2 1,867 688 0 0 68 0.20 0.53

27 2,296.68 1,423.3 1.5 1,794 952 0 0 82 0.24 0.06

28 2,296.79 1,424.6 1.3 1,822 1,090 0 0 89 0.26 0.06

29 2,296.91 1,426.0 1.4 1,833 1,032 0 0 99 0.29 0.00

30 2,296.99 1,426.9 0.9 1,753 1,190 0 0 96 0.28 0.00

TOTALS 158.0 104,187 21,895 0 2 2,636 7.91 1.02

ACRE-FEET 158,000 206,655 43,429 0 4 5,229

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

 ** Evaporation and precipitation records taken from station at Trinity River Hatchery.

Precipitation

This month = 1.02

October 01, 2022 To date = 36.99

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 43,429 Outlet 4

Spill 0 Total 43,433

SUMMARY 

Historical Archive and Report Database

Trinity Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 7/18/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,351.15

 2,351.05

 2,350.80

 2,350.67

 2,350.47

 2,350.30

 2,350.06

 2,349.84

 2,349.58

 2,349.38

 2,349.08

 2,348.76

 2,348.54

 2,348.40

 2,348.28

 2,348.15

 2,348.06

 2,347.95

 2,347.92

 2,347.87

 2,347.77

 2,347.66

 2,347.61

 2,347.52

 2,347.46

 2,347.40

 2,347.41

 2,347.40

 2,347.40

 2,347.37

 2,347.28

 2,151.2

 2,149.7

 2,146.0

 2,144.0

 2,141.0

 2,138.4

 2,134.8

 2,131.5

 2,127.6

 2,124.6

 2,120.1

 2,115.3

 2,112.0

 2,109.9

 2,108.1

 2,106.2

 2,104.8

 2,103.2

 2,102.7

 2,102.0

 2,100.5

 2,098.9

 2,098.1

 2,096.8

 2,095.9

 2,095.0

 2,095.1

 2,095.0

 2,095.0

 2,094.5

 2,093.2

STORAGE

+2.3

-1.5

-3.8

-2.0

-3.0

-2.6

-3.6

-3.3

-3.9

-3.0

-4.5

-4.8

-3.3

-2.1

-1.8

-1.9

-1.3

-1.6

-0.4

-0.7

-1.5

-1.6

-0.7

-1.3

-0.9

-0.9

+0.1

-0.1

+0.0

-0.4

-1.3

CHANGE

4,923

4,290

3,363

4,151

3,971

3,843

3,647

3,718

3,293

3,340

3,168

2,649

2,969

2,980

3,187

3,156

3,449

3,330

3,954

3,810

3,426

3,329

3,777

3,465

3,518

3,442

3,734

3,921

3,701

3,591

3,578

INFLOW

 3,495

 3,909

 4,030

 3,996

 4,060

 4,192

 4,158

 4,250

 4,060

 4,053

 4,038

 3,973

 4,026

 4,023

 4,044

 4,083

 4,049

 4,118

 4,118

 4,111

 4,111

 4,102

 4,096

 4,097

 3,898

 3,827

 3,585

 3,930

 3,648

 3,759

 4,175

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 257

 1,131

 1,225

 1,130

 1,431

 939

 1,295

 1,136

 1,193

 792

 1,402

 1,056

 571

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 27

 13

 9

 13

 0

 4

 18

 0

 9

 9

 0

 35

 31

 13

 48

 53

 79

 40

 61

 75

 66

 53

 57

 44

 70

 66

 74

 66

 53

 57

 79

C.F.S.

 .06

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .04

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .08

 .07

 .03

 .11

 .12

 .18

 .09

 .14

 .17

 .15

 .12

 .13

 .10

 .16

 .15

 .17

 .15

 .12

 .13

 .18

INCHES

 .02

 .37

 .02

 .00

 .99

 .17

 .07

 .60

 .15

 .02

 .29

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 24, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -55.4 110,673 124,014 0 13,558 1,222 2.78 2.75

ACRE-FEET -55,400 219,520 245,982 0 26,892 2,424

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 245,982

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 26,892

 272,874

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.75

JULY 1, 1999 24.90

 2,149.0

Table 4

(1) (1)
#### Ezekiel J. M. Hale *v.*The People *ex rel.*Louis C. Huck.

1. Sewerage tax—*limitation as to amount.*Cities under the general incorporation act, prior to the act of 1871, the former act not containing the limitation clause found in the latter as to the amount, to be raised for sewerage purposes, seem not to have been restricted in that regard, and the act of 1873 confers power to tax for such purpose, but contains no limitation clause as to amount.

2. *Taxes—notice of application—appearance.*Any defect in the notice of an application for judgment against lands for taxes, or even the want of any notice, is obviated by the appearance of the tax-payer and contesting the tax on the merits.

Appeal from the County Court of Cook *county;*the Hon. Martin R. M. Wallace, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Kerr & Matthews, for the appellant.

Mr. Francis Adams, Mr. John M. Rountree, and Mr. W. H. Holden, for the appellee.

Per Curiam:

The objection that the “sewerage tax” for which judgment was rendered, is in excess of the amount allowed by law for the extension, laying and maintaining of sewers, does not seem to be well taken. When the taxes con*73tested were imposed, the city was under the general incorporation act, and that does not appear to contain the limitation clause found in the act of 1871. The act of 1873, in the seventh clause of section 1, also confers power upon the city to levy taxes for building, extension and maintenance of sewers, but contains no limitation clause as to the amount that may be raised in any fiscal year.

The judgment for the taxes levied upon a certain tract of land described, is said to be erroneous, because the notice given does not specify the year 1873 as one of the years for which judgment for taxes will be asked. It appears the taxes assessed for that year were forfeited, and then carried forward and added to the taxes of the succeeding year against the property. Our attention has not been directed to any clause of the revenue law that makes it imperative the notice which the law requires to be given shall specify the years for which taxes were forfeited in the subsequent application for judgment; but if it shall be conceded the notice is defective in the respect indicated, it is obviated by the fact the objector appeared in the court below and contested as to the merits of the taxes imposed. According to the decision in *The People*v. *Sherman,*83 Ill. 165, where there is an appearance in such cases, and the defense is made as to the merits of such taxes, it makes no difference whether there was a defective notice or no notice at all.

The other questions made are disposed of by the opinion in *Law*v. *The People, post*p.—385, to which reference is made.

No error is perceived in the record that in any manner affects the justness of the taxes objected to, and the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
§ 688.590 What program income requirements apply under the YouthBuild program? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, program income requirements, as specified in the applicable Uniform Administrative Requirements at 2 CFR parts 200 and 2900, apply to YouthBuild grants.
( b ) Revenue from the sale of buildings rehabilitated or constructed under the YouthBuild program to homeless individuals and families and low-income families is not considered program income. Grantees are encouraged to use that revenue for the long-term sustainability of the YouthBuild program.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 830.32

 829.70

 829.30

 829.23

 829.20

 829.19

 829.19

 829.19

 829.19

 829.19

 829.19

 829.19

 829.19

 829.19

 829.13

 829.11

 829.08

 829.01

 828.98

 828.96

 828.93

 828.90

 828.86

 828.81

 828.78

 828.74

 828.72

 828.70

 828.67

 828.65

 37.56

 36.88

 36.44

 36.37

 36.33

 36.32

 36.32

 36.32

 36.32

 36.32

 36.32

 36.32

 36.32

 36.32

 36.26

 36.24

 36.20

 36.13

 36.09

 36.07

 36.04

 36.01

 35.97

 35.91

 35.88

 35.84

 35.82

 35.79

 35.76

 35.74

STORAGE

-0.71

-0.68

-0.44

-0.08

-0.03

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.07

-0.02

-0.03

-0.08

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.04

-0.05

-0.03

-0.04

-0.02

-0.02

-0.03

-0.02

CHANGE

-23

-11

-36

49

25

31

38

38

39

38

37

37

37

37

8

31

25

6

24

23

23

25

17

14

22

19

29

32

25

29

INFLOW

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 308

 306

 152

 58

 16

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 11

 11

 16

 15

 10

 10

 11

 11

 12

 11

 10

 10

 10

 10

 14

 10

 10

 12

 8

 2

 7

 9

 7

 9

 7

 8

 8

 8

 6

 5

C.F.S.

 .32

 .32

 .45

 .43

 .30

 .30

 .32

 .32

 .35

 .33

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .28

 .41

 .30

 .28

 .34

 .23

 .06

 .20

 .26

 .21

 .27

 .20

 .23

 .22

 .23

 .18

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 RUN DATE: 10/22/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -2.51 688 1,149 525 288 8.39 .04

ACRE-FEET -2,510 1,365 2,279 1,041 571

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,041

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,279

 3,320

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .04

JULY 1, 2004 .04

 38.27

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### §1132. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–660, §2, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 911, which provided for funds remaining after payment of expenses to be distributed in equal shares to members of the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §9253. Repealed. Pub. L. 115–198, §9, July 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 1525

Section, Pub. L. 114–122, title IV, §403, Feb. 18, 2016, 130 Stat. 115, authorized appropriations for fiscal years 2017 through 2021 to carry out provisions in chapter 85 of this title.
#### § 2462.2 Publication of notice of classification.

After having considered the comments received as the result of publication, the authorized officer may classify the lands any time after the expiration of 60 days following the publication of the proposed classification in the Federal Register. The authorized officer shall publicize the classification in the same manner as the proposed classification was publicized, indicating in the notice the differences, if any, between the proposed classification and the classification.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 231

 238

 236

 223

 219

 219

 208

 201

 194

 192

 190

 196

 207

 211

 216

 225

 224

 220

 212

 200

 174

 162

 151

 151

 148

 154

 145

 147

 156

 187

 186

 184

 184

 180

 154

 146

 132

 138

 152

 162

 170

 178

 190

 192

 193

 195

 188

 157

 118

 117

 113

 107

 118

 118

 118

 117

 117

 110

 212

 215

 213

 205

 200

 197

 182

 172

 168

 171

 178

 183

 190

 197

 201

 205

 209

 206

 197

 167

 144

 135

 131

 134

 134

 132

 132

 138

 136

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 10, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
[Cite as State ex rel. Weaver v. Sheehan , 2023

- Ohio

- 3890.]

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

STATE EX REL. , DANIEL WEAVER, :

Relator, No. 11 3194 : v. : JUDGE BRENDAN SHEEHAN ADMINISTRATIVE / PRESIDING JUDGE , :

Respondent. :

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

JUDGMENT: W RIT DENIED DATE D : October 20, 2023

Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 568555 Order No. 568668

Appearances:

D ean n a Robertson , for relator

. Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and James E. Moss , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney , for respondent

.

EMANUELLA D. GROVES , J.:

Daniel Weaver , the relator, has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo

. Weaver seeks an order from this court that compels Judge BrendanSheehan , the respondent, to render a ruling with regard to an application for

expungement/sealing of the criminal conviction, filed November 6, 2020, in State

v. Weaver , Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR

- 20

- 654316

- A . Judge Sheehan has filed a motion for summary judgment that is granted.

Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of judgment entry, journalized October 12, 2023, which demonstrates that Judge Sheehan has granted Weaver’s application for expungement/sealing of the criminal conviction in

CR

- 20

- 654316

- A. Relief is unwarranted because the request for a writ of procedendo is moot. Procedendo will not compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed. State ex rel. Ames v. Pokorny, 164 Ohio St.3d 538, 2021

- Ohio

- 2070, 173 N.E.3d 1208; Thompson v. Donnel ly , 155 Ohio St.3d 184, 2018

- Ohio

- 4073, 119 N.E.3d 1292; State ex rel. S.Y.C. v. Floyd , 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No.
109602, 2020

- Ohio

- 5189. See also State ex rel. Williams v. Croce , 153 Ohio St.3d
348, 2018

- Ohio

- 2703, 106 N.E.3d 55; State ex rel. Hopson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas , 135 Ohio St.3d 456, 2013

- Ohio

- 1911, 989 N.E.2d 49; State ex rel.
Fontanella v. Kontos , 117 Ohio St.3d 514, 2008

- Ohio

- 1431, 885 N.E.2d 220.

Writ denied

.

________________________ EMANUELLA D. GROVES , JUDGE

MARY EILEEN KILBANE , P. J ., and MARY J. BOYLE , J., CONCUR
### §6842. Certification requirement

#### (a) In general

Prior to the initial obligation or expenditure of funds appropriated pursuant to section 6841 of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury shall certify that adequate procedures and standards have been established to ensure accountability for and monitoring of the use of funds contributed to the Trust Fund, including the cost of administering the Trust Fund.

#### (b) Transmittal of certification

The certification required by subsection (a), and the bases for that certification, shall be submitted by the Secretary of the Treasury to Congress.

(Pub. L. 106–264, title I, §142, Aug. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 758.)