alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HURIAS MACHUCA VALENCIA, AKA 

Lazaro Machuca Valencia, AKA Manuel 

Machuca Valencia, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-70104 

Agency No. A098-959-174 

MEMORANDUM*

HURIAS MACHUCA VALENCIA, AKA 

Lazaro Machuca Valencia, AKA Manuel 

Machuca Valencia, AKA Lazaro Machucha 

Valencia, AKA Manuel Machucha Valencia, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-72718 

Agency No. A098-959-174 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

FILED

JUN 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Submitted June 5, 2020**

Seattle, Washington

Before: GOULD, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Hurias Machuca Valencia (“Machuca”), a native and citizen of Mexico, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) 

dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his 

application for withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252,

and we deny the petition. 

1. Machuca made only passing reference to the BIA’s determination that 

he could safely relocate within Mexico in his opening brief to this Court and 

therefore waives his right to challenge it on appeal. Aguilar-Ramos v. Holder, 594 

F.3d 701, 703 n.1 (9th Cir 2010) (“Issues raised in a brief that are not supported by 

argument are deemed abandoned.” (quoting Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 

1259 (9th Cir. 1996))). The relocation finding is dispositive as to fear of future 

persecution. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.16(b)(3)(i) (“In cases in which the applicant has not 

established past persecution, the applicant shall bear the burden of establishing that 

it would not be reasonable for him or her to relocate . . . .”). We therefore will not 

consider Machuca’s separate argument that the BIA erred in failing to find that he 

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
3 

has a well-founded fear of future persecution.

2. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Machuca’s motion to 

reopen where Machuca did not include with the motion any application for the relief 

sought or a supporting declaration.

1

 See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 581 (9th 

Cir. 2016) (“We review the Board’s denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of 

discretion . . . .”); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (“A motion to reopen proceedings for the 

purpose of submitting an application for relief must be accompanied by the 

appropriate application for relief and all supporting documentation.”).

PETITION DENIED. 

1 Machuca’s motion for judicial notice (Dkt. No. 23) and motion to strike (Dkt. No. 

34) are DENIED as moot.
### §13–1. Authorization of appropriations for funds for basic educational support through parent committees

Such sums as are needed under section 13 of this title are authorized to be appropriated to provide funds for basic educational support through parent committees under the Act of April 16, 1934 [25 U.S.C. 5342 et seq.], to those public schools educating Indian students and whose total sum of Federal, State, and local funds is insufficient to bring the education of the enrolled Indian students to a level equal to the level of education provided non-Indian students in the public schools in which they are enrolled where the absence of such support would result in the closing of schools or the reduction in quality of the education program afforded Indian students attending public schools.

(Pub. L. 95–561, title XI, §1103(b), Nov. 1, 1978, 92 Stat. 2316.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of April 16, 1934, referred to in text, is act Apr. 16, 1934, ch. 147, 48 Stat. 596, popularly known as the Johnson-O'Malley Act, which is classified generally to section 5342 et seq. of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 1530(a) of Pub. L. 95–561, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 1221e–3 of Title 20, Education.
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

Cora

Merna

Daniel

Boulder

Pinedale

LaBarge

Marbleton

Big Piney

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

APPROVED PINEDALE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Transportation Routes

Map A17-2

SUBLETTE

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

U.S. Highway

State Highway

County Road

BLM Road
EXHIBIT 31.1

                        ANNUAL CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Greenwood , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of San Jose International,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. As the certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c.   presented in this annual report the conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have disclosed, based on the most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6. As the registrant's certifying officer, I have indicated in this annual
report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of the most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of December 2003.

/s/ Christopher Greenwood
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 263

 224

 220

 227

 235

 235

 229

 235

 256

 222

 217

 227

 235

 243

 252

 253

 254

 237

 229

 232

 216

 224

 250

 245

 227

 213

 212

 207

 204

 204

 196

 218

 198

 190

 195

 211

 208

 205

 213

 193

 187

 193

 208

 214

 222

 232

 233

 221

 214

 210

 208

 202

 203

 207

 201

 202

 201

 194

 185

 188

 185

 185

 245

 206

 202

 207

 222

 221

 216

 220

 213

 203

 208

 217

 226

 233

 243

 247

 241

 223

 220

 220

 210

 215

 222

 215

 211

 207

 205

 198

 196

 194

 191

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 2, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### Mary Murphy, Respondent, v. Colonial Life Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Term, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 3d day of January, 1914, affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court.

*876Per Curiam:

The policy contains the express provision that “if the insured shall die within six calendar months from the date hereof the company will pay only one-half of this sum. After six months from its date the policy will be in force for the full amount.” The policy was dated the 28th of October, 1912, and the deceased died in January, 1913. Under this policy, therefore, but one-half of the amount insured was payable. We agree with the Appellate Term in the construction of section 68 of the Insurance Law.* (Reported in 83 Misc. Rep. 475.) The determination and judgment are, therefore, modified by reducing the judgment accordingly, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Determination and judgment modified as directed in opinion, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.

*

 Consol. Laws, chap. 28 (Laws of 1909, chap. 33), § 58.—[Rep.
### §1300d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–555, §1, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1168, which related to distribution of judgment funds and payment of attorney fees and expenses, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 105–387, §1, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3471, provided that Pub. L. 105–387, enacting part B of this subchapter (former section 1300d–21 et seq. of this title) and amending former sections 1300d–3 and 1300d–4 of this title, could be cited as the "Mississippi Sioux Tribes Judgment Fund Distribution Act of 1998".
### §§219 to 226. Repealed. May 21, 1934, ch. 321, 48 Stat. 787

Section 219, R.S. §2134, related to foreigners entering Indian country without passports, penalty for such entry and contents of passports.

Section 220, R.S. §2147, related to authority to remove person from Indian country and to use of military force.

Section 221, R.S. §2148, related to person returning after removal from Indian country.

Section 222, R.S. §2149, related to authority to remove person from Indian reservation and use of necessary force.

Section 223, R.S. §2150, related to employment of military.

Section 224, R.S. §2151, related to detention and treatment of persons apprehended by military.

Section 225, R.S. §2152, related to arrest of absconding Indians, use of military force to apprehend such Indians and to prevent tribal hostilities.

Section 226, R.S. §2153, related to posse comitatus in executing process.
### §185. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(d)(1), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3379

Section, acts Aug. 4, 1947, ch. 478, §5, 61 Stat. 751; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §5, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Oct. 17, 1979, Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), 93 Stat. 695, related to availability for various expenditures of appropriations for care of persons in Saint Elizabeths Hospital.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
# C_2012246EN.01001101.xml

| 15.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/11

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2012/C 246/04

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 9.7.2012 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 9.7.2012-31.12.2012 |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Stock or group of stocks | SAL/3BCD-F |
| Species | Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) |
| Zone | EU waters of subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea excl. Gulf of Finland) |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

9.7.2012

Duration

9.7.2012-31.12.2012

Member State

Sweden

Stock or group of stocks

SAL/3BCD-F

Species

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

Salmo salar

Zone

EU waters of subdivisions 22-31 (Baltic Sea excl. Gulf of Finland)

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-127681) on Form S-8 of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 26, 2004 and December 25, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of theyears in the three-year period ended December 25, 2005, which report appears in the December 25, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Orlando, Florida 

March 27, 2006 

Certified Public Accountants
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             166,219
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      131,667
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         12,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   318,897
<PP&E>                                           2,352,673
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,221,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     482,361
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               91,478
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            83,500
<OTHER-SE>                                         219,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       482,361
<SALES>                                          1,037,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,037,371
<CGS>                                              609,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      407,559
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     20,216
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        20,216
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .001
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .001



</TABLE>
### §1103. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–656, §3, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 906, which related to distribution of shares of deceased enrollees and minors or persons under legal disability, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 182

 182

 181

 181

 181

 187

 183

 185

 182

 176

 176

 176

 175

 173

 175

 179

 182

 180

 181

 173

 169

 162

 163

 163

 166

 171

 167

 171

 168

 165

 168

 173

 173

 171

 171

 167

 162

 164

 172

 170

 169

 167

 165

 165

 165

 172

 173

 174

 162

 163

 158

 153

 139

 142

 158

 156

 158

 155

 156

 153

 173

 176

 176

 177

 177

 174

 174

 173

 175

 173

 171

 171

 169

 168

 170

 174

 177

 177

 170

 167

 164

 157

 154

 151

 161

 162

 162

 162

 160

 160

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 20, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             Date: February 23, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510

                                  ROYAL AHOLD
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
                     (Address of principal executive office)





     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                     Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                ---                       -----

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                          Yes                       No   X
                                ---                     ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.

<PAGE>


         On February 20, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold") issued a
press release announcing that Jan Andreae, a member of the Executive Board of
Royal Ahold, has decided on his own initiative to withdraw from the Executive
Board. A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                        KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.


                                       /s/ H.R. Ryopponen
                                       -----------------------------------------
Date:  February 23, 2004               By:      H.R. Ryopponen
                                       Title:   Executive Vice President and CFO





<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

99.1           Royal Ahold press release, dated February 20, 2004, announcing
               that Jan Andreae, a member of the Executive Board of Royal Ahold,
               has decided on his own initiative to withdraw from the Executive
               Board
### Mica deposits of the southeastern Piedmont, Part 9, Thomaston-Barnesville district, Georgia; Part 10, Outlying deposits in Georgia

By: E. W. HeinrichM. R. KlepperR. H. Jahns

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp248F

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 27**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 28**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 29**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 30**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 31**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 32**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 33**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 34**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 35**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 36**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 37**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 38**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 39**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 40**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 41**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 42**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Georgia mica mines(1944)                                    

                                        Map of the Mitchell Creek mine, Upson County, Georgia(1944)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.