alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

      Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities
                              Exchange Act of 1934

                                   ----------

I, Francis Chang, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ELECTRONIC SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company");

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period for which this quarterly report is being
prepared; and

b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of
Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.


Dated: May 11, 2006                             /s/ Francis Chang
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Francis Chang
                                                Secretary and Vice President of
                                                Finance and Administration
#### In the Matter of Arbitration between Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, Local 39, C.I.O., Respondent, and Todd Shipyards Corporation, Appellant.

Present • — • Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See post, pp. 668, 697.]
Caterpillar Work Tools & Services 

<100 VVotk Tool Drive, POQon 6 

Wafncgr] Kmia^ 66547-0006 USA 

CATERPILLAR ,,,,„,,,,„,„ 

^^A'K~T OPERATION; 

^0;l ilAY 3] A I!: 3U 

September 20, 2010 

Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

US Department of Transportation / W86-334 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Small Community Air Service Development Program Application 

DOCKET DOT-OST- 2010-0124, City of Manhattan, KS 

Dear Secretary Kurland: 

I would like to express my support for the Small Community Air Service Development 

Program Grant for the Manhattan Regional Airport In Manhattan, Kansas. Caterpillar Work 

Tools is located in Wamego, Kansas, not far from Manhattan, and many of our employees 

live in the Manhattan area. We manufacture work tools for Caterpillar and the majority of 

factory production is for the Caterpillar plant in Aurora, Illinois, just outside of Chicago. Our 

General Manager is located there, along with both our product managers and a number of 

engineers. The Chicago flight will greatly reduce our commuting time between these two 

locations for the employees in both locations, as well as when we meet with other Caterpillar 

employees in the area. We look forward to utilizing the new service at every opportunity. 

We have two other Caterpillar Work Tool plants in the United States. One is in Waco, Texas, 

south of Dallas, and the other is in Jacksonville, Florida. The flight to Dallas has already 

been a benefit to our employees by providing access to DFW Airport, and has also allowed 

our employees to make connections in DFW in the past. I am sure the Chicago flight will add 

to our ability to make connections, especially when flying overseas from O'Hare Airport. 

We are pleased to see the expanded service out of the Manhattan Regional Airport. 

This will help support the growth we expect in the coming years both in the 

community and in our own company. We appreciate your support on this worthwhile 

program. 

Sincerely, 

Robert A. Astolfj ^ 

Business Manager 

Caterpillar Work Tools, Inc.
§ 22.5 Payment of claims. ( a ) When an award of $2,500 or less is made, the voucher signed by the claimant shall be transmitted for payment to the appropriate Bureau or Office of the Department. When an award over $2,500 is made, transmittal for payment will be made as prescribed by § 14.10 of the regulations (28 CFR part 14).
( b ) Prior to payment appropriate releases shall be obtained as provided in said section.
§ 20.202 Ethics program responsibilities. ( a ) The Designated Agency Ethics Official (or the alternate agency ethics official in his or her absence) shall coordinate and manage the department's ethics program in accordance with 5 CFR 2638.203.
( b ) Each Ethics Counselor shall, for his or her bureau: ( 1 ) Order disciplinary or remedial action in accordance with the provisions of subpart F of this part. This authority may not be redelegated.
( 2 ) Designate: ( i ) The Bureau Personnel Officer (or other qualified headquarters employee) as Deputy Ethics Counselor to carry out operational duties of the Ethics Counselor within their bureaus under the general direction of the Ethics Counselor; and
( ii ) Headquarters bureau, regional, or area personnel officers (or other qualified employees) as Associate Ethics Counselors or Assistant Ethics Counselors to perform ethics counseling and the collection and review of financial disclosure reports.
( 3 ) Ensure that vacancy announcements for positions which require a public or confidential financial disclosure report alert applicants to the filing requirement.
( 4 ) Establish and maintain internal procedures and guidelines to adequately and systematically inform employees of the content, meaning, and importance of ethical conduct and other conduct regulations.
( c ) All supervisors may make decisions as to whether conduct by employees under their supervision would result in the appearance that the employee would violate or is violating the ethical standards set forth in 5 CFR 2635; all supervisors are expected, therefore, to be familiar with those standards. In addition, any supervisor who grants prior approval of an employee's outside employment under 5 CFR 3501.105(b) is expected, at a minimum, to provide information to the employee about the prohibitions in 18 U.S.C. 203, 205 and 208 at the time such approval is granted.
Exhibit 32.2

     Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities
                     Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. 1350

                                   ----------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ELECTRONIC SENSOR
TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company") for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Report"), I, Francis Chang, Secretary and Vice President of Finance and
Administration, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May 11, 2006                             /s/ Francis Chang
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Francis Chang
                                                Secretary and Vice President of
                                                Finance and Administration
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 505.23

 505.39

 505.42

 506.61

 507.37

 506.22

 505.67

 507.00

 507.00

 506.51

 505.77

 505.53

 506.11

 506.39

 506.83

 507.34

 506.79

 506.10

 506.93

 507.53

 507.82

 507.97

 507.99

 507.95

 508.50

 508.88

 508.57

 508.56

 508.50

 507.76

 508.23

 61,177

 61,366

 61,401

 62,811

 63,725

 62,346

 61,695

 63,277

 63,277

 62,692

 61,813

 61,530

 62,214

 62,549

 63,074

 63,689

 63,026

 62,202

 63,193

 63,919

 64,271

 64,453

 64,477

 64,428

 65,105

 65,572

 65,191

 65,178

 65,105

 64,198

 64,772

STORAGE

+282

+189

+35

+1,410

+914

-1,379

-651

+1,582

+0

-585

-879

-283

+684

+335

+525

+615

-663

-824

+991

+726

+352

+182

+24

-49

+677

+467

-381

-13

-73

-907

+574

CHANGE

2,900

2,934

2,614

2,827

2,501

1,174

1,415

2,506

1,786

1,579

1,499

1,891

2,454

2,414

2,554

2,635

1,843

1,707

2,632

2,537

2,348

2,287

2,198

2,012

2,291

2,196

1,728

1,995

2,043

1,640

2,376

INFLOW

 1,874

 1,875

 1,873

 1,880

 1,881

 1,815

 1,732

 1,701

 1,776

 1,867

 1,874

 1,874

 1,875

 1,879

 1,879

 1,883

 1,884

 1,879

 1,878

 1,885

 1,887

 1,896

 1,889

 1,891

 1,892

 1,896

 1,893

 1,899

 1,902

 1,894

 1,891

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 114

 194

 196

 197

 196

 70

 0

 0

 0

 0

 46

 98

 98

SPILL

 878

 961

 721

 230

 153

 47

 0

 0

 0

 0

 56

 150

 223

 357

 401

 433

 293

 226

 128

 92

 76

 92

 88

 65

 47

 53

 13

 87

 118

 94

 85

OUTLET

 6

 3

 2

 6

 6

 7

 11

 7

 10

 7

 12

 10

 11

 9

 9

 9

 0

 17

 12

 0

 12

 10

 13

 11

 11

 12

 14

 16

 14

 11

 13

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 06/01/2009

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +3,877 67,516 57,894 1,209 6,167 291

ACRE-FEET +3,877 133,918 114,833 2,398 12,232 577

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 114,833

SPILL 2,398 129,463

 60,895

OUTLET 12,232

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,548

 2,541

 2,367

 2,715

 2,508

 1,187

 1,394

 2,482

 1,791

 1,579

 1,493

 1,905

 2,418

 2,331

 2,486

 2,587

 1,790

 1,718

 2,630

 2,472

 2,338

 2,327

 2,217

 2,037

 2,336

 2,422

 2,054

 2,139

 1,588

 1,467

 2,059

 65,926

 130,764

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
Exhibit
23.1





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm







The Board
of Directors


Waterstone
Financial, Inc





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 of Waterstone Financial, Inc. of our reports dated March 11, 2009 with
respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Waterstone
Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Waterstone Financial,
Inc.





/s/ KPMG
LLP


Milwaukee,
Wisconsin


March 11,
2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 111

 131

 131

 109

 108

 200

 130

 107

 132

 122

 109

 128

 152

 124

 121

 118

 124

 106

 108

 141

 135

 108

 145

 146

 148

 129

 115

 117

 104

 126

 153

 101

 101

 107

 105

 103

 107

 101

 100

 102

 97

 99

 99

 101

 88

 91

 92

 94

 90

 90

 109

 106

 104

 103

 114

 105

 103

 103

 99

 100

 101

 112

 104

 113

 112

 107

 105

 131

 114

 102

 112

 104

 103

 107

 115

 100

 97

 99

 103

 98

 97

 120

 119

 105

 111

 124

 115

 112

 109

 104

 101

 106

 125

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 18, 2012

HIGH LOW MEAN

 53.2

 54.1

 55.6

 57.4

 59.0

 58.0

 55.8

 56.1

 57.8

 58.3

 58.6

 58.0

 57.7

 57.5

 59.3

 58.9

 58.2

 54.9

 54.9

 58.0

 58.1

 61.7

 61.8

 60.5

 59.6

 60.4

 59.1

 60.4

 60.9

 63.4

 62.7

 51.4

 50.3

 51.1

 53.1

 54.6

 55.3

 52.3

 51.9

 53.3

 54.5

 55.5

 55.2

 56.2

 55.8

 56.0

 58.1

 55.1

 52.8

 51.2

 53.7

 55.8

 59.1

 57.4

 58.5

 57.0

 56.9

 57.7

 57.1

 57.9

 59.3

 60.0

 52.3

 52.3

 53.4

 55.2

 56.7

 56.8

 54.2

 54.1

 55.5

 56.5

 57.0

 56.8

 56.9

 56.5

 57.5

 58.5

 56.5

 53.9

 53.0

 55.6

 56.6

 60.4

 59.6

 59.5

 58.4

 58.6

 58.1

 58.6

 59.4

 61.3

 61.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.2

 10.4

 10.3

 9.9

 9.7

 9.4

 9.9

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 9.4

 9.3

 9.5

 9.1

 9.0

 9.6

 9.9

 9.6

 9.4

 9.0

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.2

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 8.5

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.5

 9.2

 9.0

 9.3

 9.7

 9.5

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.1

 9.0

 9.0

 8.6

 8.6

 9.0

 9.5

 9.2

 9.1

 8.6

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 8.8

 8.5

 8.2

 10.0

 10.1

 10.0

 9.7

 9.4

 9.2

 9.6

 9.9

 9.8

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.2

 9.1

 9.2

 8.9

 8.8

 9.3

 9.7

 9.4

 9.2

 8.8

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 8.8

 8.4

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4454 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4454

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 236 Concord Exchange North in South Saint Paul, Minnesota, as the 
              ``Officer Leo Pavlak Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2022

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Ms. Smith) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 236 Concord Exchange North in South Saint Paul, Minnesota, as the 
              ``Officer Leo Pavlak Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OFFICER LEO PAVLAK POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 236 Concord Exchange North in South Saint Paul, Minnesota, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Officer Leo Pavlak Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Officer 
Leo Pavlak Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 2741.9 Patent provisions. ( a ) All patents under the act shall provide that title shall revert upon a finding, after notice and opportunity for a hearing, that, without the approval of the authorized officer: ( 1 ) The patentee or its approved successor attempts to transfer title to or control over the lands to another;
( 2 ) The lands have been devoted to a use other than that for which the lands were conveyed;
( 3 ) The lands have not been used for the purpose for which they were conveyed for a 5-year period; or
( 4 ) The patentee has failed to follow the approved development plan or management plan.
( b ) Patents shall also provide that the Secretary of the Interior may take action to revest title in the United States if the patentee directly or indirectly permits his agents, employees, contractors, or subcontractors (including without limitation lessees, sublessees, and permittees) to prohibit or restrict the use of any part of the patented lands or any of the facilities thereon by any person because of such person's race, creed, color, sex or national origin.
[44 FR 43472, July 25, 1979. Redesignated at 50 FR 50300, Dec. 10, 1985]
#### § 2563.1-2 Approval.

Care will be taken in all cases before patent issues to see that the lands applied for are used for the purposes contemplated by the said Act of March 3, 1927, and that they are not used for any purpose inconsistent therewith.
§ 10005.4 Planning rule authority. ( a ) The Commission is required to adopt administrative rules pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act. The Commission adopts the rule in this part pursuant to that authority and to Section 301(g)(3)(A) and (C) of the Act, which provide for establishment of a rule to guide applicants in making recommendations to the Commission, and to ensure appropriate public involvement.
( b ) Adoption of the planning rule constitutes a policy decision on the part of the Commission and, as such, requires formal public notification and approval by the Commission according to established procedures. The planning rule is a component of the administrative rules of the Commission and has the authority accorded to such administrative rules, as described in the Administrative Procedures Act.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Lucious Gregg (Impleaded), Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 56467;

First District (3rd Division) —

July 5, 1973.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Stanley Sacks, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Sharon Grossman, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

SCHWARTZ, J., took no part.
§ 2470.2 Allowance and entry. ( a ) After lands are classified pursuant to the regulations of this part, and opened for entry or other disposal, all the laws and regulations governing the particular kind of entry, location, selection, or other disposal must be complied with in order for title to vest or other interests to pass.
( b ) After lands are classified for disposal under the regulations of this subpart, the lands shall be offered for sale or other disposal consistent with the classification. If a petitioner-applicant does not have a preference right under § 2450.8, the lands shall be opened on an equal-opportunity basis.
[35 FR 9565 June 13, 1970]
Group 2500—Disposition; Occupancy and Use

Note:
The information collection requirements contained in parts 2520, 2530, 2540 and 2560 of Group 2500 have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3507 and assigned clearance numbers 1004-0004, 1004-1010, 1004-0011, 1004-0023, 1004-0026, 1004-0028, 1004-0029 and 1004-0069. The information is being collected to permit the authorized officer to determine whether certain petitions or applications for use and occupancy of the public lands should be granted. The information will be used to make that determination. A response is required to obtain a benefit.
[48 FR 40889, Sept. 12, 1983]
J.

J. his plea canvass, noted that McGee stated that he felt "clear-headed" and was properly medicated at the time, and recalled that "we proceeded to talk about your case and your constitutional rights." The district court stated that it accepted McGee's guilty plea after he answered in the affirmative to the question of whether he was pleading guilty because he was, in fact, guilty of the charged offense. At that point, the district court announced, "And so today is the date and time set for sentencing in this matter, And I'm prepared to go forward with the sentencing."

We conclude that the district court's announcement amounts to a denial of the oral motion. McGee offers no relevant authority to support his claim that the district court was obligated to explore his request "more fully." Our review of the record reveals that McGee failed to either provide a substantial, fair, and just reason which required the withdrawal of his plea, see Crawford, 117 Nev. at 721, 30 P.3d at 1125, or satisfy his burden and prove that his plea was invalid, see Molina v. State, 120 Nev. 185, 190, 87 P.3d 533,537 (2004). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying McGee's motion, see Johnson v. State, 123 Nev. 139, 144, 159 P.3d 1096, 1098 (2007), and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Pickering

\ jt.A. GL—C , J

. Parraguirre

Saitta

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

### e

### cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 3
(0) I947A
#### Leo C. Dessar, as Executor, etc., Respondent, *v.*Charles S. Hirsch and Others, as Executors, etc., Appellants.

Appeal from a determination of the Appellate Term reversing an order of the City Court which denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside a verdict and for a new trial, and ordering judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Per Curiam:

We think there was a question of fact as to whether the person writing the letter was an agent of the decedent and authorized to make a lease of the property for her, which was fairly submitted to the jury, and its verdict should not be disturbed. It follows that the determination of the Appellate Term reversing the order denying a motion for a new trial and dismissing the complaint should be reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term, and the order of the City Court affirmed. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Determination reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term, and order of City Court affirmed. Order to be settled on notice.