alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 703.303 Decision on employer's application. ( a ) The Branch will issue a decision granting or denying the employer's application to be an authorized self-insurer. If the Branch grants the application, the decision will fix the amount of security the employer must deposit. The Branch will transmit its decision to the employer in a way it considers appropriate.
( b ) The employer is authorized to self-insure beginning with the date of the Branch's decision. Each grant of authority to self-insure is conditioned, however, upon the employer's execution and filing of an Agreement and Undertaking and deposit of the security fixed in the decision in the form and within the time limits required by § 703.304. In the event the employer fails to comply with the requirements set forth in § 703.304, its authorization to self-insure will be considered never to have been effective, and the employer will be subject to appropriate penalties for failure to secure its LHWCA obligations.
( c ) The Branch will require security in the amount it considers necessary to fully secure the employer's LHWCA obligations. When fixing the amount of security, the Branch may consider a number of factors including, but not limited to, the— ( 1 ) Employer's overall financial standing;
( 2 ) Nature of the employer's work;
( 3 ) Hazard of the work in which the employees are employed;
( 4 ) Employer's payroll amount for employees engaged in employment within the purview of the Act; and
( 5 ) Employer's accident record as shown in the application and the Office's records.
( d ) If an employer believes that the Branch incorrectly denied its application to self-insure, or that a lesser security deposit would fully secure its LHWCA obligations, the employer may request a hearing before the Director of the Division of Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation (Longshore Director) or the Longshore Director's representative. Requests for hearing must be in writing and sent to the Branch within ten days of the date of the Branch's decision. The employer may submit new evidence and/or argument in support of its challenge to the Branch's decision and must provide any additional documentation OWCP requests. The Longshore Director or his representative will notify the employer of the hearing date within 10 days of receiving the request. The Longshore Director or his representative will issue the final agency decision on the application within 60 days of the hearing date, or, where evidence is submitted after the hearing, within 60 days of the receipt of such evidence, but no later than 180 days after receiving the employer's request for a hearing.
### §§802 to 807. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 802, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title I, §121, 60 Stat. 1000; Oct. 7, 1978, Pub. L. 95–426, title I, §116, 92 Stat. 969, set forth definitions applicable to provisions of this chapter.

Section 803, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title X, §1001, 60 Stat. 1030, related to prohibition on wearing of uniforms.

Section 804, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title X, §1002, 60 Stat. 1030; Oct. 15, 1966, Pub. L. 89–673, §8(3), 80 Stat. 953, related to acceptance of gifts by chief of mission or other principal officer.

Section 805, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title X, §1003, 60 Stat. 1030, related to prohibition on engaging in business abroad.

Section 806, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title X, §1004, 60 Stat. 1030, related to prohibition on personal correspondence on affairs of foreign governments.

Section 807, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title X, §1005, 60 Stat. 1030, related to prohibition on political, racial, religious, or color discrimination.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
- housingcommunity_001
- housingcommunity_002
- housingcommunity_003
- housingcommunity_004
- housingcommunity_005
- housingcommunity_006
- housingcommunity_007
- housingcommunity_008
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-16-00306- CR

Luan n Meyer P enny, App ellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B URNET COUNTY , 33RD J UDICIAL DI STRICT NO. 44,2 71, H ONO RAB LE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R P ER CURIAM

I n the above cause , appellant’ s brief was firs t d u e o n J uly 25, 2016. Appellant’s counsel has n o w fi l ed her fourth and “fina l” motion for extension of time to file appellant’ s brief, seeking an ex tension until November 23, 2016, for a t o t al ex tension of 120 day s. We g rant t h e motion and ORDER counsel to file appellant’ s brief no later than the following M o n d ay , November 28, 2016. No further extension s wi ll be g rante d. I f counsel fails to file a brief by the deadline, a

hear ing be fore the district court will be orde red. 1 I t is ordere d on November 3, 2016.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and F ield Do Not Publish

See Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(b). 1
§ 725.513 Accountability; transfer. ( a ) The district director may require a representative payee to submit periodic reports including a full accounting of the use of all benefit payments certified to a representative payee. If a requested report or accounting is not submitted within the time allowed, the district director shall terminate the certification of the representative payee and thereafter payments shall be made directly to the beneficiary. A certification which is terminated under this section may be reinstated for good cause, provided that all required reports are supplied to the district director.
( b ) A representative payee who has conserved or invested funds from payments under this part shall, upon the direction of the district director, transfer any such funds (including interest) to a successor payee appointed by the district director or, at the option of the district director, shall transfer such funds to the Office for recertification to a successor payee or the beneficiary.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter S. Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of MDRNA, Inc. (MDRNA), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of MDRNA on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MDRNA.

Date: July 30, 2009



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    Peter S. Garcia 
|Name:  |  | Peter S. Garcia        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MDRNA and will be
retained by MDRNA and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by MDRNA for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00223-CV

Appellants, Brett Bray, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of

the Texas Department of Transportation; and Gulf States Toyota, Inc.//

Cross-Appellant, Tejas Toyota, Inc. 

v.

Appellee, Tejas Toyota, Inc.//Cross-Appellees, Brett Bray, in his Official Capacity as

Director of the Motor Vehicle Division of the Texas Department of Transportation;

and Gulf States Toyota, Inc.

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-09-002086, HONORABLE GISELA D. TRIANA-DOYAL, JUDGE PRESIDING

C O N C U R R I N G O P I N I O N

I concur in the judgment and reasoning of the majority opinion, with the exception of

the discussion of the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing found in footnote eleven. Because we

need not address the applicability of the statutory duty of good faith and fair dealing to dispose of the

appeal, I decline to join footnote eleven of the majority opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 47. 1 (courts of

appeals must hand down written opinion that is brief as practicable but that addresses every issue raised

and necessary to final disposition of appeal).

__________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson

Filed: February 2, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given a change in the meeting of the National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, May 21, 2012, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Bethesda Marriott Suites, 6711 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, Maryland 20817 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 2, 2012, 77 FR 19675.                

The meeting location has been changed to The Bolger Center, 9600 Newbridge Drive, Stained Glass Hall, Potomac, Maryland 20854. The time remains the same.

Dated: April 24, 2012.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-10329 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### §452. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 452 was editorially reclassified as section 5342 of this title.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A1 70 6

. SHI RLEEN B L U E-BANKS v . BOARD OF REVI EW LABOR BOARD.

Sh i rl een Bl u e-Ban k s fi l ed t hi s d i rect ap p eal fro m t h e s up eri or co u rt ’ s o rd er affi rm in g t h e d eci si o n o f t h e Bo ard o f Rev i ew o f t h e Geo rg i a Dep art m en t o f Lab o r

t h at den i ed h er cl ai m fo r u n em p l o y m en t b en efi ts

. Un der OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 ),
h o wev er, a p art y s eek i n g t o ap p eal a s u p eri o r co u rt deci s i o n rev i ewi n g a s t at e ag en cy

ru l i n g m u s t b e i n i t i at ed b y fi l i n g an ap p l i cat io n fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew. See Du n l a p

v. Ci ty o f At l an t a , 2 7 2 Ga. 5 23
, 5 2 4 (5 3 1 SE2 d 7 02 ) (2 0 00 ). Bl u e-Ban ks ’ s fai l u re to
fo l l o w t he req u i si t e ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f j u ri sd i ct i o n o ver t h i s ap p eal
, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. May 17, 2018

05/17/2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 793.90

 793.90

 793.90

 793.90

 793.90

 793.90

 793.90

 793.56

 793.52

 793.50

 793.46

 793.46

 793.41

 793.44

 793.44

 793.44

 793.44

 793.44

 793.44

 793.44

 793.44

 793.46

 793.44

 793.62

 793.69

 793.73

 793.78

 793.84

 793.90

 793.95

 9.19

 9.19

 9.19

 9.19

 9.19

 9.19

 9.19

 9.03

 9.01

 9.00

 8.98

 8.98

 8.96

 8.97

 8.97

 8.97

 8.97

 8.97

 8.97

 8.97

 8.97

 8.98

 8.97

 9.05

 9.09

 9.11

 9.13

 9.16

 9.19

 9.21

STORAGE

-0.12

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

-0.16

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

+0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

-0.01

+0.08

+0.03

+0.02

+0.02

+0.03

+0.03

+0.02

CHANGE

2

22

22

22

22

21

22

-58

10

16

11

20

6

24

16

17

16

16

16

16

16

19

10

57

33

26

28

31

30

28

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 56

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 16

 16

 16

 16

 14

 14

 13

 13

 13

 13

 12

 12

 12

 12

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

OUTLET

 5

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 5

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 4

 3

 3

 4

 4

 4

 2

 2

 2

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .32

 .29

 .27

 .25

 .25

 .23

 .29

 .29

 .30

 .33

 .30

 .26

 .24

 .23

 .23

 .25

 .22

 .22

 .25

 .24

 .24

 .11

 .14

 .16

 .25

 .20

 .21

 .20

 .23

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2013 RUN DATE: 10/17/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.11 537 478 0 106 7.20 .07

ACRE-FEET -110 1,065 948 0 210

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 948

 948

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .07

JULY 1, 2013 .07

 9.30

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
§ 2569.409 Where do I file my application? You must file your application with the BLM Alaska State Office in Anchorage, Alaska, by one of the following methods: ( a ) Mail or delivery service: Bureau of Land Management, ATTN: Alaska Native Vietnam-era Veterans Land Allotment Section, 222 West 7th Avenue, Mail Stop 13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504; or
( b ) In person: Bureau of Land Management Alaska, Public Information Center, 222 West 7th Avenue, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.
§ 702.272 Informal recommendation by district director. ( a ) If the district director determines that the employee has been discharged or suffered discrimination and is able to resume his or her duties, the district director will recommend that the employer reinstate the employee and/or make such restitution as is indicated by the circumstances of the case, including compensation for any wage loss suffered as the result of the discharge or discrimination. The district director may also assess the employer an appropriate penalty, as determined under authority vested in the district director by the Act. If the district director determines that no violation occurred he must notify the parties of his findings and the reasons for recommending that the complaint be denied. If the employer and employee accept the district director's recommendation, within 10 days it will be incorporated in an order, to be filed and served in accordance with § 702.349.
( b ) If the parties do not agree to the recommendation, the district director must, within 10 days after receipt of the rejection, prepare a memorandum summarizing the disagreement, send a copy to all interested parties, and within 14 days thereafter, refer the case to the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge for hearing pursuant to § 702.317.
[42 FR 45302, Sept. 9, 1977, as amended at 80 FR 12929, Mar. 12, 2015]
#### Conny F. THOMAS, Movant, v. Nettie E. THOMAS, Opposed.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 8, 1943.

Johnson & Feather and C. R. Lúker for movant.

M. A. Gray opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of San Jose International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher Greenwood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
24th day of December, 2002.


/s/ Christopher Greenwood
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
### §287. Taking child to school in another State without written consent

No Indian child shall be taken from any school in any State or Territory to a school in any other State against its will or without the written consent of its parents.

(June 10, 1896, ch. 398, §1, 29 Stat. 348.)
### §458aaa–14. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 458aaa–14 was editorially reclassified as section 5395 of this title.
1 

### Sutton, Lisa

From: Suzuki, Debra

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 6:07 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa Subject: FW: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction SIP Call Final Action

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

From: Suzuki, Debra

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:57 PM

To: denise.koch@alaska.gov

Cc: Kelly, Kate; Dave Bray
Subject: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction SIP Call Final Action



### Hi Denise. This message is a follow-up to Kate ’s recent phone call notifying you about the final

action the EPA Administrator signed today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including when the source is operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are treated in state im plementation plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 states, including Alaska, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Ac t and the EPA’s current SSM Policy. Your state will have 18 months to submit revisions of your st ate plan to EPA. Your state’s revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.

As part of our notification to your state about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from the EPA’s Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe. To inform you of the details on the final action, including the specific SIP provis ions your state needs to address, we have posted a pre-publication vers ion of the action on our website

at: http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ur banair/sipstatus/emissions.html

.

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensur e the SIP revision process is as efficient as possible. If you or your staff have questions, pl ease feel free to contact me at 206-553-0985 or Dave Bray at 206-553-4253.

Thank you,

Debra Suzuki EPA Region 10 Air Planning Unit Manager
#### § 2812.4 Arbitration and agreements.
Exhibit 32.4
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 16, 2011
    /s/ Guy A. PaglincoGuy A. PaglincoVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMirror Material Properties Compiled for Preliminary Design of the Next Generation Space Telescope (30 to 294 Kelvin)This technical memorandum reports on the mirror material properties that were compiled by NASA Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) from April 1996 to June 1997 for preliminary design of the Next Generation Space Telescope (NGST) Study. The NGST study began in February 1996, when the Program Development Directorate at NASA MSFC studied the feasibility of the NGST and developed the pre-phase A program for it. After finishing some initial studies and concepts development work on the NGST, MFSC's Program Development Directorate handed this work to the Observatory Projects Office at MSFC and then to NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). This technical memorandum was written by MSFC's Preliminary Design Office and Materials and Processes Laboratory for the NGST Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA) team, in Support of NASA GSFC. It contains material properties for 9 mirror Substrate materials, using information from at least 6 industrial Suppliers, 16 textbooks, 44 technical papers, and 130 technical abstracts.Document ID19980201336Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLuz, P. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Rice, T.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1998Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208181NASA/TM-1998-208181M-869Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980201336.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024