alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2200 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: 214

- 740

- 8000 Fax: 214

- 740

- 8800 www.lockelord.com

Cynthia K. Timmsl Direct Telephone: 214

- 740

- 8635 Direct Fax: 214

- 756

- 8633

ctimms@lockelord.com

Atlanta | Austin | Boston | Chicago | Dallas | Hartford | Hong Kong | Houston | Istanbul | London | Los Angeles | Miami | Mor ristown | New Orleans New York | Orange County | Providence | Sacramento | San Francisco | Stam ford | Tokyo | Washington DC | West Palm Beach 

### December 23, 2015

Via eFile.TXCourts.gov

Mr. Keith E. Hottle Clerk of the Court Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas Cadena

- Reeves Justice Center 300 Dolorosa, Suite 3200 San Antonio, Texas 78205-3037

Re: Court of Appeals Number: 04-15-00487- CV Trial Court Cause: 7,637 ConocoPhillips Company v. Leon O. Ramirez, Jr., et al.

Dear Mr. Hottle:

On behalf of Appellant ConocoPhillips Company, I hereby request an electronic copy of the supplemental clerk’s record filed with the Court of Appeals on December 18, 2015. Please send the record via FedEx Overnight to my attention at Locke Lord LLP, 2200 Ross Avenue, S uite 2800, Dallas, Texas 75201. If you do not already have our law firm’s FedEx account number from a previous request, please call Vicki Martin at 214-740-8212.

Please let me know if you have any questions or need any further information. Thank you.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Cynthia K. Timms Cynthia K. Timms

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY

cc: All Counsel of Record – Via eFile ACCEPTED 04-15-00487-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/23/2015 10:52:01 AM KEITH HOTTLE CLERK
### §9801. Appropriate congressional committees defined

In this chapter:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(B) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

#### (2) Relevant Federal department or agency

The term "relevant Federal department or agency" means the Department of State, the United States Agency for International Development, the Department of Defense, the Department of 1 Treasury, and any other Federal department or agency the President determines is relevant to carry out the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 116–94, div. J, title V, §502, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3060.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 116–94, div. J, title V, §501, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3060, provided that: "This title [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Global Fragility Act of 2019'."

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by "the".
Exhibit 10.7
 3Com Corporation
Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
Plan Document and Summary Plan Description
   I. EFFECTIVE DATE
  II. ELIGIBILITY TO PARTICIPATE
  III. ELIGIBILITY TO RECEIVE BENEFITS
 th
 3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 1




---



##### 



IV. BENEFITS
 th
 Severance Amounts
  th
 nd
 st
  3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 2




---



##### 



1 2 1 2
 Health, Dental & Vision Benefits
 Life Insurance
 Equity Compensation
 th
 3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 3




---



##### 



V. DEFINITIONS
 Cause
 Termination Date
 Voluntary Termination for Good Reason
      3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 4




---



##### 



VI. FUNDING
  VII. CLAIMS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES
  Initial Claim
 Appeals
 3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 5




---



##### 



Exhaustion of Claims Procedures
 VIII. ADMINISTRATION
  IX. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION
   Plan Name
 Plan Sponsor
 3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 6




---



##### 



Plan Administrator
  
 Type of Plan
  Employer Identification Number
  Plan Number
  Service of Legal Process
  X. ENTIRE PLAN; AMENDMENTS
  XI. NO CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT
  XII. NO ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS
  3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 7




---



##### 



XIII. APPLICABLE LAW; VENUE
  XIV. ERISA RIGHTS
  Receive Information About Your Plan and Benefits.
 (1)
    
    Examine, without charge, at the office of the Section 16 Plan Administrator or
its delegate all Section 16 Plan documents, including copies of any documents filed by
the Section 16 Plan with the U.S. Department of Labor, such as Section 16 Plan
descriptions.(2)
    
    Obtain copies of all Section 16 Plan documents and other Section 16 Plan
information upon written request to the Section 16 Plan Administrator. The Section 16
Plan Administrator may impose a reasonable charge for the copies.(3)
    
    Receive a copy of the Section 16 Plans financial report, if any. The Section
16 Plan Administrator may be required by law to furnish each participant with a copy of
the summary annual report.
 Prudent Actions By Fiduciaries.
  Enforce Your Rights.
  3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 8




---



##### 



Assistance With Your Questions.
 3Com Corporation Section 16 Officer Severance Plan
    
    Last updated 1/15/09
 9
(No. 4685

#### Beulah Iola Gruber Reilly, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April*20, 1956.

Beulah Iola Gruber Reilly, Claimant, pro se.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; Bernard Genis, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*309Wham, J.

This cause comes before us upon the petition of claimant, appearing pro se, and upon the motion of respondent to dismiss the petition.

Claimant, a member of the Armed Forces of the United States during World War II,. claims that she is entitled to the payment of a bonus under the Illinois World War II Bonus Law. Her petition alleges that her claim for bonus was previously filed in the year of 1946, and denied by the Service Recognition Board on the ground that claimant made no proof of her voting record. In November of 1954 she obtained a statement, signed by a Precinct Committeeman, named E. J. Conroy of Springfield, Illinois, setting forth the fact that she voted in all elections from 1937 to and including 1943. This statement is attached to her petition.

Claimant relies upon Par. 65, Chap. 1261⁄2, Ill. Rev. Stats., (1955 State Bar Association Edition), as granting jurisdiction to this Court to determine the claim. This sub-paragraph reads as follows:

> “Any peison who had a claim, which would have been compensable by the Seivice Recognition Board except that during the period for filing claims such person was ineligible by reason of a dishonorable discharge from service, who prior to July 1, 1953, has or shall have such discharge reviewed and has obtained or shall obtain an honorable discharge, and any person who had an amended or supplemental claim pending before the Service Recognition Board on May 20, 1953 but had not by that date submitted sufficient evidence upon which the Service Recognition Board could pay the amended or supplemental claim shall be entitled to have such claim considered by the Court of Claims and to have an award on the same basis as if his claim had been fully considered by the Service Recognition Board.”

It is apparent from the petition that claimant was honorably discharged from the United States Navy in *310November of 1945. It does not appear from the petition that claimant had an amended or supplemental claim pending before the Service Recognition Board on May 20, 1953. In the absence of an allegation to that effect, we assume that she did not have such amended or supplemental claim pending.

We must, therefore, conclude that this Court has no jurisdiction over the matter set forth in the petition, since neither of the two conditions to the statute’& applicability are present.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition is well taken in this regard, and should be allowed. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40348

Summary Calendar

CHARLES KENNETH NELSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director,

Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(C-95-163)

January 16, 1997

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

Charles Kenneth Nelson, Texas prisoner # 503292, appeals the

judgment of the district court denying his second petition for

habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Nelson has not

established cause and prejudice for failing to raise his Sixth2

Amendment claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in his first

habeas corpus petition. Duff-Smith v. Collins , 995 F.2d 545, 546

(5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 509 U.S. 933 (1993). Although Nelson

asserts his innocence, he has not supplemented his Sixth Amendment

claim with a colorable showing of factual innocence; therefore, the

miscarriage-of-justice exception does not apply. S ee Callins v.

Johnson

, 89 F.3d 210, 213 (5th Cir.), cert. denied

, 1996 WL 625764

(U.S. Dec. 2, 1996) (No. 96-6391). Nelson has not shown that it is

more likely than not that but for the asserted errors of his

counsel no reasonable juror would have convicted him. S chlup v.

Delo

, 115 S.Ct. 851, 867 (1995). The judgment of the district

court in favor of the respondent is AFFIRMED on grounds that

Nelson’s second habeas corpus petition constitutes an abuse of the

writ. S ee Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Cases.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Young America Films, Inc., Respondent, and Transfilm Incorporated, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 885.]
### §1300d–21. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 105–387, §2, Nov. 13, 1998, 112 Stat. 3471, which set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Mary Schwartz, Respondent, v. Royal Novelty Children’s Dresses Corporation et al., Appellants.

No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 150

 148

 149

 158

 166

 170

 169

 179

 195

 190

 192

 185

 189

 183

 180

 177

 189

 173

 177

 170

 166

 136

 147

 163

 172

 167

 162

 143

 132

 146

 143

 143

 145

 147

 157

 161

 163

 169

 172

 174

 171

 166

 157

 151

 151

 154

 146

 138

 137

 138

 132

 126

 128

 132

 131

 129

 130

 122

 125

 127

 147

 146

 147

 152

 160

 163

 166

 173

 177

 179

 178

 175

 168

 165

 165

 164

 158

 152

 151

 149

 145

 129

 137

 147

 140

 143

 141

 132

 128

 132

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 19, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,274.26

 2,273.83

 2,273.25

 2,272.16

 2,270.74

 2,269.27

 2,267.94

 2,267.08

 2,266.54

 2,265.97

 2,265.44

 2,264.94

 2,264.51

 2,264.19

 2,263.82

 2,263.44

 2,263.08

 2,262.65

 2,262.28

 2,261.96

 2,261.55

 2,261.10

 2,260.67

 2,260.28

 2,259.90

 2,259.51

 2,259.11

 2,258.73

 2,258.45

 2,258.15

 2,257.82

 1,180.8

 1,176.5

 1,170.7

 1,159.9

 1,145.9

 1,131.5

 1,118.6

 1,110.4

 1,105.2

 1,099.8

 1,094.7

 1,090.0

 1,085.9

 1,082.9

 1,079.5

 1,075.9

 1,072.5

 1,068.5

 1,065.1

 1,062.1

 1,058.3

 1,054.1

 1,050.2

 1,046.6

 1,043.1

 1,039.5

 1,035.9

 1,032.4

 1,029.9

 1,027.2

 1,024.2

STORAGE

-3.1

-4.3

-5.8

-10.8

-14.0

-14.4

-12.9

-8.3

-5.2

-5.4

-5.0

-4.7

-4.1

-3.0

-3.5

-3.6

-3.4

-4.0

-3.4

-3.0

-3.8

-4.2

-4.0

-3.6

-3.5

-3.6

-3.7

-3.5

-2.5

-2.7

-3.0

CHANGE

844

836

876

604

835

730

611

883

686

512

476

618

500

583

496

614

555

640

706

888

685

657

664

652

669

582

540

462

608

488

404

INFLOW

 2,309

 2,342

 2,210

 1,889

 1,284

 1,389

 1,338

 1,503

 1,497

 1,471

 1,437

 1,849

 2,030

 2,074

 2,004

 1,877

 1,712

 2,121

 1,899

 1,856

 1,844

 1,803

 1,721

 1,476

 1,451

 1,633

 1,789

 1,805

 1,822

 1,802

 1,832

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 593

 1,501

 4,103

 6,522

 6,508

 5,694

 3,468

 1,712

 1,712

 1,510

 1,093

 461

 0

 190

 499

 499

 499

 499

 498

 712

 911

 911

 910

 910

 667

 515

 324

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 106

 74

 85

 73

 84

 69

 71

 79

 79

 73

 64

 67

 53

 30

 55

 33

 44

 41

 44

 35

 41

 41

 27

 73

 65

 78

 78

 75

 67

 59

 77

C.F.S.

 .36

 .25

 .29

 .25

 .29

 .24

 .25

 .28

 .28

 .26

 .23

 .24

 .19

 .11

 .20

 .12

 .16

 .15

 .16

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .10

 .27

 .24

 .29

 .29

 .28

 .25

 .22

 .29

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .09

 .02

 .04

 .06

 .03

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2015 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 18, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -160.0 19,904 55,069 0 43,421 1,940 6.97 .50

ACRE-FEET -160,000 39,480 109,229 0 86,126 3,848

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 109,229

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 86,126

 195,355

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .50

JULY 1, 2014 26.93

 1,183.9

Table 4

(1) (1)
The manuals were to large to upload to the website. I have included the links for download. However, I am sure you have many copies already floating around and have thoroughly seen these documents with other applicants. Links to Manuals:

DJI Phantom 3 Professional User’s Guide. https://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/phantom_3/pt/ Phantom_3_Professional_Quick_Start_Guide_pt_V1.2_1214.pdf Phantom 3 Professional Quick Start Guide. https://dl.djicdn.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/ Phantom_3_Professional_Quick_Start_Guide_en_V1.2_1214.pdf Thanks, Christopher Parrish 3331167 ATP CFI CFII
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### The geology and geography of the Paunsaugunt region, 
Utah

#### Professional Paper 226

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp226 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:15
Exhibit 99.1
CORPBANCA



Santiago, February 22, 2005
SBIF/144/2005


Mr. Enrique Marshall Rivera
Superintendent of Banks and Financial Institutions

Mr. Superintendent:

It is my pleasure to inform you that at the Ordinary Shareholders' Meeting held
on February 21, 2005, the following decisions were reached:

1.        Approval of the Annual Report, Balance Sheet and Financial Statements,
          including Footnotes and the Report of the Independent Auditors,
          relating to the fiscal year between January 1 and December 31, 2004.

2.        The designation of Deloitte & Touche Sociedad de Auditores Consultores
          Limitada, as independent auditors for fiscal year 2005.

3.        The Board of Directors will not be compensated for their services
          during the upcoming fiscal year.

4.        The immediate distribution of a dividend for fiscal year 2004 in the
          aggregate amount of Ch$25,383,634,798, representing 50% of Corpbanca's
          2004 net income of Ch$50,767,269,596, or a dividend per share of
          Ch$0.111866881842752. The dividend was paid at the end of the
          Shareholders' Meeting to those shareholders of record listed in the
          Shareholders' Registry as of February 15, 2005. The remaining net
          income will be placed in the reserve of net income to be distributed.

5.        The determination that the dividend policy for the upcoming fiscal
          year would be to distribute 50% of net income as a dividend.

6.        The annual budget for the Directors Committee was set at
          Ch$137,000,000, which includes Ch$3,500,000 of monthly compensation
          for each member of the committee and an additional monthly payment of
          Ch$500,000 for the President of the Committee.

Sincerely,



Christian Samsing Stambuk
Chief Executive Officer
### §5873. Report to Congress

Within one year after October 24, 1992, the President shall submit to the designated congressional committees a report describing—

(1) the opportunities for increased space-related trade with the independent states of the former Soviet Union;

(2) a technology procurement plan for identifying and evaluating all unique space hardware, space technology, and space services available to the United States from the independent states;

(3) specific space hardware, space technology, and space services that have been, or could be, the subject of discussions described in section 5871(c) of this title;

(4) the trade missions carried out pursuant to section 5872(a) of this title, including the private participation in and the results of such missions;

(5) any barriers, regulatory or practical, that inhibit space-related trade between the United States and independent states, including any such barriers in either the United States or the independent states; and

(6) any anticompetitive issues raised during the course of negotiations, as observed pursuant to section 5872(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–511, title VI, §603, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3347.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 794.01

 794.08

 794.17

 794.20

 794.27

 794.34

 794.41

 794.49

 794.53

 794.58

 794.67

 794.75

 794.83

 794.89

 794.93

 795.01

 795.08

 795.15

 795.20

 795.25

 795.31

 795.39

 795.46

 795.53

 795.59

 795.67

 795.73

 795.79

 795.84

 795.89

 795.95

 9.24

 9.27

 9.31

 9.33

 9.36

 9.39

 9.43

 9.47

 9.48

 9.51

 9.55

 9.59

 9.63

 9.66

 9.68

 9.72

 9.75

 9.79

 9.81

 9.83

 9.86

 9.90

 9.94

 9.97

 10.00

 10.04

 10.07

 10.10

 10.13

 10.15

 10.18

STORAGE

+0.03

+0.03

+0.04

+0.01

+0.03

+0.03

+0.03

+0.04

+0.02

+0.02

+0.04

+0.04

+0.04

+0.03

+0.02

+0.04

+0.04

+0.03

+0.02

+0.03

+0.03

+0.04

+0.04

+0.03

+0.03

+0.04

+0.03

+0.03

+0.03

+0.03

+0.03

CHANGE

31

32

37

24

35

33

32

35

26

28

35

33

33

28

23

34

31

30

25

26

28

33

32

31

29

33

29

29

26

26

29

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 13

 13

 13

 13

 14

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

OUTLET

 3

 2

 3

 4

 4

 3

 2

 2

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .18

 .15

 .19

 .26

 .25

 .17

 .15

 .16

 .18

 .22

 .13

 .12

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .19

 .13

 .12

 .14

 .11

 .12

 .14

 .11

 .13

 .11

 .08

 .11

 .11

 .08

 .05

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 RUN DATE: 12/19/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.97 936 371 0 68 4.38 .00

ACRE-FEET +970 1,857 736 0 135

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 736

 736

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2013 .07

 9.21

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS