alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11 – COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE*(In thousands, except per share data)*                   Six Months Ended June 30,  Three Months Ended June 30,   2006  2005  2006  2005 Basic Numerator:                Income before discontinued operations $294,302  $280,353  $197,489  $213,235 Income (loss) from discontinued operations,net  —   (11,739)  —   7,497              Net income  294,302   268,614   197,489   220,732 Diluted Numerator:                                 Effect of dilutive securities — none  —   —   —   — Numerator for income before discontinuedoperations — diluted $294,302  $280,353  $197,489  $213,235 Numerator for discontinued operations, net -diluted  —   (11,739)  —   7,497              Net income — diluted  294,302   268,614   197,489   220,732 Denominator:                                 Weighted average common shares — basic  509,591   551,673   501,136   543,904                  Effect of dilutive securities:                Stock options and restricted stock  801   1,307   924   1,186              Denominator for net income per common share -diluted  510,392   552,980   502,060   545,090                  Net income (loss) per common share:                Income before discontinued operations — basic $.58  $.51  $.39  $.39 Loss from discontinued operations, net — basic  —   (.02)  —   .02              Basic $.58  $.49  $.39  $.41                               Income before discontinued operations -diluted $.58  $.51  $.39  $.39 Loss from discontinued operations, net -diluted  —   (.02)  —   .01              Diluted $.58  $.49  $.39  $.40
#### Michael Furio, Respondent, v. B. Hawley Smith et al., a Partnership Doing Business as Hawley Smith Machinery Company, Appellants.

In an action to recover rent, judgment in favor of the respondent landlord and against appellant tenants unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, *1018Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Johnston, J., concurs on authority of *Malbone Garage, Inc.,*v. *Minkin*(272 App. Div. 109, affd. 297 N. Y. 677).
§ 702.217 Penalty for false statement, misrepresentation. ( a ) Any claimant or representative of a claimant who knowingly and willfully makes a false statement or representation for the purpose of obtaining a benefit or payment under this Act shall be guilty of a felony, and on conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000, by imprisonment not to exceed five years, or by both.
( b ) Any person including, but not limited to, an employer, its duly authorized agent or an employee of an insurance carrier, who knowingly and willingly makes a false statement or representation for the purpose of reducing, denying or terminating benefits to an injured employee, or his dependents pursuant to section 9, 33 U.S.C. 909, if the injury results in death, shall be punished by a fine not to exceed $10,000, by imprisonment not to exceed five years, or both.
[50 FR 398, Jan. 3, 1985]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6088

JOSEPH RIDDICK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; US GOVERNMENT, Western District of Virginia; UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-96-8-R)

Submitted: July 25, 1996 Decided: August 7, 1996

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Because

Appellant could have amended his complaint to assert some claim,

the district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable.

See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d

1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,345.27

 2,344.98

 2,344.71

 2,344.45

 2,344.25

 2,344.03

 2,343.77

 2,343.54

 2,343.31

 2,343.08

 2,342.81

 2,342.58

 2,342.35

 2,342.18

 2,341.99

 2,341.81

 2,341.59

 2,341.35

 2,341.15

 2,340.95

 2,340.79

 2,340.71

 2,340.61

 2,340.47

 2,340.28

 2,340.09

 2,339.88

 2,339.67

 2,339.44

 2,339.20

 2,063.4

 2,059.1

 2,055.1

 2,051.3

 2,048.4

 2,045.1

 2,041.3

 2,037.9

 2,034.6

 2,031.2

 2,027.2

 2,023.9

 2,020.5

 2,018.1

 2,015.3

 2,012.7

 2,009.5

 2,006.0

 2,003.1

 2,000.2

 1,997.8

 1,996.7

 1,995.2

 1,993.2

 1,990.5

 1,987.7

 1,984.7

 1,981.6

 1,978.3

 1,974.9

STORAGE

-1.9

-4.3

-4.0

-3.8

-2.9

-3.2

-3.8

-3.4

-3.4

-3.4

-3.9

-3.4

-3.4

-2.5

-2.8

-2.6

-3.2

-3.5

-2.9

-2.9

-2.3

-1.2

-1.4

-2.0

-2.8

-2.8

-3.0

-3.0

-3.3

-3.5

CHANGE

-10

-39

-11

102

493

203

158

222

347

225

72

281

312

66

135

248

88

169

430

313

717

1,354

1,260

940

611

522

467

422

240

245

INFLOW

 928

 2,078

 1,958

 2,018

 1,968

 1,826

 2,077

 1,909

 2,043

 1,925

 2,058

 1,927

 1,975

 1,300

 1,520

 1,551

 1,701

 1,925

 1,880

 1,752

 1,886

 1,938

 1,987

 1,962

 1,989

 1,892

 1,972

 1,948

 1,904

 1,976

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 30

 43

 35

 13

 9

 9

 4

 13

 4

 0

 4

 47

 30

 17

 13

 17

 0

 4

 17

 26

 0

 0

 4

 0

 9

 17

 25

 0

 8

 13

C.F.S.

 .07

 .10

 .08

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .11

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .04

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .06

 .00

 .02

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .07

 .41

 .00

 .63

 .10

 .70

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -90.5 10,582 55,773 0 0 411 .96 2.35

ACRE-FEET -90,500 20,989 110,626 0 0 815

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 110,626

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 110,626

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.35

JULY 1, 2011 6.23

 2,065.3

Table 4

(1) (1)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4416 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4416

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12715, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to three consecutive 2-year periods 
from the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by 
the Commission. Any obligation of the licensee for the payment of 
annual charges under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
803(e)) shall commence upon conclusion of the time period to commence 
construction of the project, as extended by the Commission under this 
subsection.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 
expiration and the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
shall take effect on the date of such expiration.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4416

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Northern Explorations Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 25, 2008


By: /s/ Ralph Claussner
   ----------------------------------
   Ralph Claussner
   President/Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ David Naylor
   ----------------------------------
   David Naylor
   Chief Financial Officer
### §139. Appropriations for subsistence

The Secretary of the Interior, under the direction of the President, may use any surplus that may remain in any of the appropriations for the purchase of subsistence for the several Indian tribes, to an amount not exceeding $25,000 in the aggregate, to supply any subsistence deficiency that may occur: Provided, That any diversions which shall be made under authority of this section shall be reported in detail, and the reason therefor, to Congress, at the session of Congress next succeeding such diversion.

(Mar. 1, 1907, ch. 2285, 34 Stat. 1016.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, David P. Suleski, the Chief Financial Officer of Canyon Resources Corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007, (the “Form 10-Q”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: August 13, 2007 /s/ David P. Suleski   David P. Suleski   Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Consumer-operatedservices**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.427:C 76/2/
ItemNumber:0497-D-01(online)
CGPsystem Number:000943813
 
 
 
How to Use the EBP KIT (PDF)
Getting Started with EBPs (PDF)
Building Your Program (PDF)
Training Frontline Staff (PDF)
Evaluating Your Program (PDF)
The Evidence (PDF)
Using Multimedia (PDF)
Brochure (English) (PDF)
FACIT (XLS)
PowerPoint Presentation (PPT)
Video (Video)
 **
ck0001641601-ex101_9.htm



Exhibit 10.1

Amendment

to

River Financial Corporation

2015 Incentive Stock Compensation Plan

 

Section 1.03 of the Plan is hereby amended to increase the authorized number of shares under such plan from 600,000 shares of Common Stock to 900,000 shares of Common Stock.

 

Dated:May 17, 2021.
Table 29

U. S. Department of the Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley - Streamflow Data

Preliminary-Subject to Change 2022

Mean monthly flow in cfs

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Sacramento River

Shasta computed inflow 7589 4179 3771 4239 3411 2967 2437 2339 2521 2015 2968 4671

At Keswick 3294 3281 3246 3259 3504 4072 4528 4565 4181 4002 3557 3315

At Bend Bridge 5759 4446 4324 4586 4415 4636 4784 4725 4410 4348 4132 6075

At Vina Bridge 6538 4766 4633 5177 4636 4544 4554 4519 4356 4351 4416 8482

At Ord Ferry 7319 4495 4088 4700 4044 3752 3695 3656 3489 3439 3777 7530

At Colusa 7834 4768 4136 4821 3917 3477 3292 3262 3361 3251 3669 6082

Below Wilkins Slough 8651 5031 4207 4858 3878 3497 3298 3221 3320 3263 3379 5765

At Verona 13207 10640 9457 7420 6067 6998 8112 7449 7166 6298 6272 9702

Sacramento at "I" Street 17325 12620 11043 8337 7056 8911 12081 10436 9613 7337 7597 11156

Miscellaneous Stations

Folsom computed inflow 3122 1894 2629 4307 3297 1874 1447 1420 1324 726 729 6823

American R at Nimbus Dam 3787 2047 1620 1037 1404 2516 4472 3451 2641 1462 1352 1928

Kings River at Pine Flat 364 111 152 176 471 3730 4981 2272 313 228 112 98

San Joaquin River

At Friant Dam 629 457 642 1068 1493 1513 316 259 250 468 531 586

Near Vernalis 1055 1316 952 949 724 715 275 184 302 854 719 1135

Putah Creek

Berryessa computed inflow 355 75 75 77 17 0 -67 -20 0 -20 -30 582

Putah Creek - Lake Solano 36 36 58 77 61 59 54 39 35 47 44 47

Stanislaus River

New Melones computed inflow 1119 967 687 1242 998 768 279 302 698 301 256 2067

At Tulloch Dam 247 1104 1444 1356 1817 1997 1606 1447 1052 891 218 319

At Orange Blossom 217 1069 443 469 672 817 299 257 266 621 154 355

* Data supplied by Central Valley Operations Office

 Daily mean is derived from 7 am daily reading.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER ON MOTION TO RECUSE

Appellate case name: Latrice Williams v. Dana Lee

Appellate case number: 01-10-00296-CV

Trial court case number: 2008-27802

Trial court: 309th District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: March 19, 2013

Party filing motion: Appellant Latrice Williams

It is ordered that the motion to recuse is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting for the Court

The Court consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Higley, Bland, Sharp, 

Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

Date: April 25, 2013
### §37. Manufacture of products by patients at naval hospitals; ownership of products

The Secretary of the Navy is authorized to furnish materials for the manufacture or production by patients of products incident to the convalescence and rehabilitation of such patients in naval hospitals and other naval medical facilities, and ownership thereof shall be vested in the patients manufacturing or producing such products, except that the ownership of items manufactured or produced specifically for the use of a naval hospital or other naval medical facility shall be vested in the Government and such items shall be accounted for and disposed of accordingly.

(Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 756, §27, 60 Stat. 856.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Delegation of Powers and Authority

Act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 756, §39, 60 Stat. 858, authorized Secretary of the Navy to delegate to such persons in Naval Establishment and to such extent as he may deem proper, with or without authority to make successive redelegations, authority conferred upon Secretary by this section, except authority to prescribe regulations. Such section 39 was repealed by act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, §53, 70A Stat. 641, less its applicability to this section and section 21a of this title.
#### Barnes v. Groves.

June 25, 1943.

*825R. J. Wade for appellant.

William 6. Reed for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Fulton

Reversing.

In the year 1935 the appellant, Richard Barnes, obtained a judgment for $25 in the Carroll Quarterly Court against the appellee, Howard Groves, as damages for personal injuries as a result of being run over by the appellant’s automobile. The judgment provided that capias ad satisfaciendum might issue. No appeal was taken from the judgment. In July, 1942 capias ad satisfaciendum was issued on the judgment and placed in the hands of the sheriff for execution.

Alleging the foregoing facts and further alleging that the judgment was void to the extent that capias ad satisfaciendum was awarded, the petition in this action, filed in the circuit court, sought an injunction against appellant and the sheriff to prevent the appellee’s arrest under the capias. From a judgment granting the injunction this appeal is prosecuted.

This court has jurisdiction of the appeal although the amount of the judgment sought to be collected by use of the capias is only $25 since the appeal is from a judgment granting an injunction and is not merely an effort to circumvent the statute limiting our right to review a monetary judgment. Commonwealth v. Burnett, 274 Ky. 231, 118 S. W. (2d) 558; Newton v. Citizen’s Bank of Shelbyville, 251 Ky. 790, 66 S. W. (2d) 7; Charos v. Jent et al., 293 Ky. 50, 168 S. W. (2d) 334.

While the quarterly court judgment may have been erroneous in awarding capias ad satisfaciendum (a question not necessary to be decided), it was not void in this particular since it was the province and duty of the court to determine whether execution of this nature might issue and to make provision with reference thereto in the judgment. Kennedy v. Brink, 293 Ky. 447, 169 S. W. (2d) 292.

*826And, since the judgment awarding the capias was not void, the circuit court was without authority to grant an injunction staying proceedings thereon. Section 285 of the Civil Code of Practice provides that “An injunction to stay proceedings on a judgment shall not he granted, in an action brought by the party seeking the injunction, in any other court than that in which the judgment was rendered.” Construing this section, we have held that collection of a void judgment may be enjoined in a court other than the one rendering it. Viall et al. v. Walker, Sheriff, 248 Ky. 197, 58 S. W. (2d) 415; Ewing v. Union Central Bank, 254 Ky. 623, 72 S. W. (2d) 4; Commonwealth v. West, 261 Ky. 204, 87 S. W. (2d) 385. But unless the judgment is void a suit to enjoin execution issued under a judgment in a justice’s court or in a quarterly court must be brought in the ■court rendering it. Ky. River Hardwood Co. v. Noble, 168 Ky. 773, 182 S. W. 941; McConnell v. Rowe, 1 S. W. 582, 8 Ky. Law Rep. 343; Stahl v. Brown, 84 Ky. 325, 1 S. W. 540. Under the authorities cited the circuit court was in error in enjoining proceedings under the quarterly court judgment which was not void.

Reversed with directions to enter a judgment in conformity with this Opinion.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 500.92

 501.31

 501.53

 501.69

 500.44

 502.27

 503.24

 503.11

 502.53

 502.43

 501.01

 501.63

 503.74

 505.00

 504.55

 504.49

 504.46

 505.60

 505.00

 505.16

 504.31

 503.37

 503.84

 503.20

 503.44

 504.34

 504.42

 504.34

 503.85

 504.07

 56,300

 56,729

 56,972

 57,148

 55,780

 57,792

 58,884

 58,735

 58,084

 57,972

 56,398

 57,082

 59,454

 60,907

 60,386

 60,317

 60,282

 61,613

 60,907

 61,095

 60,109

 59,032

 59,568

 58,838

 59,112

 60,143

 60,236

 60,143

 59,579

 59,831

STORAGE

+1,765

+429

+243

+176

-1,368

+2,012

+1,092

-149

-651

-112

-1,574

+684

+2,372

+1,453

-521

-69

-35

+1,331

-706

+188

-986

-1,077

+536

-730

+274

+1,031

+93

-93

-564

+252

CHANGE

2,578

1,885

1,809

1,768

1,568

3,565

3,099

2,499

2,211

2,480

1,740

3,108

3,956

3,313

2,245

2,480

2,507

3,152

2,106

2,748

2,337

2,303

3,163

2,771

3,332

4,498

4,620

4,558

4,318

4,776

INFLOW

 1,682

 1,663

 1,680

 1,674

 2,193

 2,424

 2,453

 2,485

 2,476

 2,472

 2,468

 2,467

 2,467

 2,480

 2,486

 2,485

 2,491

 2,459

 2,460

 2,441

 2,460

 2,449

 2,450

 2,446

 2,339

 2,447

 2,457

 2,450

 2,446

 2,450

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 57

 51

 0

 0

 0

 0

 147

 178

 34

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 172

 280

 271

 314

 633

 798

 1,441

 2,039

 2,066

 2,048

 2,071

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 58

 67

 41

 86

 60

 60

 62

 141

 110

 61

 15

 25

 15

 22

 0

 33

 88

 117

 124

 53

 55

 82

 76

 83

 92

 120

OUTLET

 6

 6

 6

 5

 7

 3

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 8

 5

 5

 7

 5

 19

 0

 2

 7

 6

 9

 5

 7

 2

 8

 1

 6

 16

 8

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 05/01/2017

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +5,296 87,493 70,300 12,600 1,746 176

ACRE-FEET +5,296 173,542 139,440 24,992 3,463 349

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 139,440

SPILL 24,992 167,895

 54,535

OUTLET 3,463

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 2,287

 1,583

 1,577

 1,518

 1,480

 3,408

 3,009

 2,244

 2,088

 2,418

 1,700

 3,066

 3,660

 3,157

 2,173

 2,412

 2,348

 2,786

 1,880

 2,652

 2,231

 2,219

 3,166

 2,702

 3,363

 4,392

 4,478

 4,513

 4,171

 4,688

 83,369

 165,362

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.