alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2

                      BANCO DE GALICIA Y BUENOS AIRES S.A.

                                                Buenos Aires, September 12, 2007

Comision Nacional de Valores (National Securities Commission)

BY HAND

                                  Ref.: Program for the issuance and re-issuance
                                  of Ordinary Negotiable Obligations for up to
                                  US$2,000,000,000 -Partial Cancellation.

Dear Sirs,

     In my capacity as attorney in fact for Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires
     Sociedad Anonima (the "Bank"), I am writing in order to inform you that, on
     the date hereof, the Bank has decided to repay the Negotiable Obligations
     detailed below and to cancel the public offering thereof, these Negotiable
     Obligations were acquired through purchases which were made under market
     conditions:

     * Negotiable Obligations due in 2014 (Class "A"): for a face value of US$
     40,292,605 (forty million two hundred and ninety two thousand six hundred
     and five US Dollars).

     After effecting this repayment, the principal amount of the outstanding
     Negotiable Obligations due in 2014 (Class "A") will have a face value of
     US$ 322,309,177 (three hundred and twenty two million three hundred and
     nine thousand one hundred and seventy seven US Dollars).

     Consequently, we request that you give effect to the partial cancellation
     of the public offering for US$ 40,292,605 of Negotiable Obligations due in
     2014 (Class "A").

                    Yours faithfully,

                             PATRICIA MABEL LASTIRY
                                Attorney in fact
(February 9, 1949.)

#### Martin Licht et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Seymour Nebenzal, Respondent-Appellant.

Present — 'Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 1037.]
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Mathews Luis, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58470;

First District (3rd Division) —

July 5, 1973.

S. M. Del Principe, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis and John M. Cutrone, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

SCHWARTZ, J., took no part.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4238 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 1, 2016 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act and 

the Local Public Works Capital Development and Investment Act of 1976 to modernize terms relating to minorities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4238 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. MODERNIZATION OF TERMS RELATING TO MI2 NORITIES. 

3 (a) OFFICE OF MINORITY ECONOMIC IMPACT.—Sec4 tion 211(f)(1) of the Department of Energy Organization 

5 Act (42 U.S.C. 7141(f)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘a 

6 Negro, Puerto Rican, American Indian, Eskimo, Oriental, 

7 or Aleut or is a Spanish speaking individual of Spanish 

8 descent’’ and inserting ‘‘Asian American, Native Hawai9 ian, a Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puer10 to Rican, Native American, or an Alaska Native’’. 

11 (b) MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISES.—Section 

12 106(f)(2) of the Local Public Works Capital Development 

13 and Investment Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6705(f)(2)) is 

14 amended by striking ‘‘Negroes, Spanish-speaking, Ori15 entals, Indians, Eskimos, and Aleuts’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islanders, Af17 rican American, Hispanic, Native American, or Alaska 

18 Natives’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 29, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 837.49

 837.43

 837.39

 836.84

 836.25

 835.59

 835.07

 834.47

 833.83

 833.12

 832.43

 831.74

 831.28

 831.12

 831.00

 830.84

 830.71

 830.61

 830.51

 830.41

 830.33

 830.25

 830.15

 830.05

 829.92

 829.87

 829.80

 829.70

 829.60

 829.54

 45.94

 45.87

 45.82

 45.14

 44.42

 43.63

 43.01

 42.29

 41.54

 40.72

 39.93

 39.14

 38.62

 38.45

 38.31

 38.13

 37.99

 37.88

 37.77

 37.66

 37.57

 37.48

 37.37

 37.26

 37.12

 37.06

 36.99

 36.88

 36.77

 36.70

STORAGE

-0.04

-0.07

-0.05

-0.68

-0.72

-0.80

-0.62

-0.71

-0.75

-0.83

-0.79

-0.78

-0.52

-0.18

-0.13

-0.18

-0.15

-0.11

-0.11

-0.11

-0.09

-0.09

-0.11

-0.11

-0.14

-0.06

-0.08

-0.11

-0.11

-0.07

CHANGE

32

16

27

27

3

-49

34

-1

-22

-60

-43

-38

-49

11

3

-41

-28

-9

-9

-8

3

4

-8

-5

-22

25

10

-10

-7

10

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

SPILL

 15

 15

 15

 332

 332

 315

 313

 323

 323

 323

 323

 323

 177

 66

 36

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 11

 13

 12

 10

 8

 12

 9

 9

 9

 8

 8

 9

 10

 10

 10

 9

 5

 7

 7

 7

 8

 8

 7

 10

 10

 13

 8

 5

 8

 3

C.F.S.

 .29

 .33

 .30

 .27

 .22

 .32

 .24

 .23

 .23

 .21

 .22

 .25

 .27

 .28

 .28

 .26

 .15

 .19

 .19

 .19

 .23

 .24

 .19

 .28

 .28

 .38

 .24

 .14

 .23

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2019 RUN DATE: 01/07/2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -9.30 -204 3,456 750 263 7.22 .10

ACRE-FEET -9,300 -405 6,855 1,488 522

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,488

OUTLET

TOTAL

 6,855

 8,343

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .10

JULY 1, 2019 .12

 45.98

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 32.18
Exhibit 10.4


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE WARRANT


 


This AMENDMENT NO. 1 
to the Warrant (as defined below) (the “Amendment”), dated as of May 22, 2021, by and between GROM SOCIAL ENTERPRISES,
INC., a Florida corporation (the “Company”), and LABRYS FUND, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Investor”).
Each of the Company and the Investor shall be referred to collectively as the “Parties” and individually as a “Party.”


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS,
the Company issued a common stock purchase warrant to Investor on April 16, 2021, for the purchase of up to 3,750,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock (the “Warrant”); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties desire to amend certain terms of the Warrant as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
are hereby acknowledged, each of the Parties agrees with the other as follows:


 


1.        
Section 2(b) of the Warrant shall be deleted in its entirety.


 


2.        
This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


3.        
The substantive laws of the applicable state, as well as terms regarding forum and jurisdiction, as originally provided in the
Warrant, shall govern the construction of this Amendment and the rights and remedies of the parties hereto.


 


4.        
Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the Warrant, which are not in conflict with the terms of this
Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.


 


 


 


[REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT
BLANK INTENTIONALLY]


 


 






    	 	1	 



     

    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have caused this Amendment No. 1 to Warrant to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


 








	 	GROM SOCIAL ENTERPRISES, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Darren Marks                         
	 	Name: Darren Marks
	 	Title: Chairman & CEO
	 	 
	 	 
	 	LABRYS FUND, LP
	 	 
	 	By: /s/ Thomas Silverman                 
	 	Name: Thomas Silverman
	 	Title: Managing Member
#### Lida T. Thomas, as Administratrix of the Estate of Charles N. Thomas, Deceased, Respondent, v. Lowell Birrell et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glen-non, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §32. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act July 1, 1898, ch. 545, §1, 30 Stat. 595, required Indian agents to account for funds received and to be responsible for such funds under their official bonds. The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with since 1908. See section 64 of this title and note set out thereunder.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 948

 946

 694

 569

 521

 488

 490

 463

 452

 437

 442

 438

 449

 425

 389

 359

 342

 339

 348

 353

 330

 319

 311

 301

 263

 265

 264

 264

 287

 297

 878

 707

 571

 516

 486

 467

 458

 439

 438

 426

 422

 420

 419

 379

 348

 343

 330

 325

 334

 323

 300

 299

 298

 263

 256

 257

 246

 259

 260

 286

 905

 853

 618

 546

 503

 476

 471

 446

 446

 431

 436

 432

 434

 393

 374

 353

 335

 330

 338

 341

 312

 311

 303

 281

 260

 260

 260

 261

 270

 291

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 6, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

30 DAY

ACCUM

MEAN

30 DAY

AVG 

MEAN

 905

 1,758

 2,376

 2,922

 3,425

 3,901

 4,372

 4,818

 5,264

 5,695

 6,131

 6,563

 6,997

 7,390

 7,764

 8,117

 8,452

 8,782

 9,120

 9,461

 9,773

 10,084

 10,387

 10,668

 10,928

 11,188

 11,448

 11,709

 11,979

 12,270

 905

 879

 792

 731

 685

 650

 625

 602

 585

 570

 557

 547

 538

 528

 518

 507

 497

 488

 480

 473

 465

 458

 452

 445

 437

 430

 424

 418

 413

 409

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

30 DAY ACCUM MEAN and 30 DAY AVG MEAN columns are 30 day runnings, except for April 1 and September 1, 

 where they do not go back 30 days.

VERNALIS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50371

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOE CLINTON SEGLER,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-88-CR-128

- - - - - - - - - -

March 6, 1996

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Clinton Segler appeals from the district court's order

denying his motion to reduce his prison term, filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). He argues that his 1989 sentence for

manufacturing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§ 841(a)(1), would have been lower under a retroactive 1993

amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, under which “mixtures or

substances” is given a different meaning. He contends that the
No. 95-50371

-2-

district court abused its discretion by applying the 1994 edition

of the Sentencing Guidelines to his 1989 sentence, thus violating

his rights under the Ex Post Facto Clause. Although Segler is

correct that the district court erred, the court’s error is

harmless because, even if the correct guidelines were applied,

Segler’s guideline sentencing range would be above the statutory

maximum sentence. See United States v. Montoya-Ortiz, 7 F.3d

1171, 1182 (5th Cir. 1993). On that basis, the district court's

denial of the motion is 

AFFIRMED.
### §1728. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 96–420, §9, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1795, which provided that payments to a tribe under this subchapter would not affect eligibility of the State for participation in Federal financial aid programs and that receipt of payments from the State would not affect eligibility of a tribe for Federal benefits, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
##### 



Exhibit 10.18
 AMENDMENT TO  REDEMPTION AND STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 T. Belville R. Belville Seller Sellers E-Rail Buyer BMC
 RECITALS
     Common Stock Shares
  Bank One Obligation
 1




---



##### 



Section 4.1
  2. REDEMPTION AND SALE OF CORPORATE STOCK
 Section 5 Redemption Shares Section 3 Sale Shares Section 3
   Mortgage 1 Exhibit C Mortgage 2 Exhibit D Notes Article 10
 2




---



##### 



Article 10 Rollyson Mortgage Section 4.6(a) Exhibit G
  Reclamation Obligations
  Closing Closing Date
  3




---



##### 



Section 3.3
  Capitalization. Securities Act
   Schedule 5.2 Pay At Closing Obligations
 4




---



##### 



SELLERS:THOMAS J. BELVILLEROBERT E. BELVILLEBMC:
BELVILLE MINING COMPANY, INC.By: THOMAS J. BELVILLETitle: PresidentBUYER:
E-RAIL LOGISTICS, INC.By: ANDREW H. KAUFMANTitle: President
 5
Page 1 of 2

Deny and Opinion filed August 2, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00745

- CV

IN RE VENKY VENKATRAMAN , Relator

Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial Distric t Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 21

- 03588

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices M yers, Nowell, and Goldstein

Opinion by Justice Myers

Before the Court is relator ’ s August 1

, 2022 petit ion for writ of ma ndamus

challenging the trial court ’ s order s entered on or about July 8, 2022 and dated July

7, 2022, denying several of relator ’ s motions

. 1 Relator cont ends the trial court

denied relator due process by ent ering the orders without conducting a hearing on

1 Relator challenges the trial court ’ s orders denying relator ’ s Amended Motion to Compel Depositions; Motion for R e consideration of Order on Plaintiff ’s Motion to Confirm that Stephen D. Ski nner formed an Atto r ney

- Client Relationship with Witnesses Sakshi Venkatraman and Smrithi Venkatraman, Motion for R econsideration of O rder on Plaintiff ’ s M otion to C ompel D eposition of Defendant Sergio Flores and M otion for S anctions; Motion for R econsider ation of O r der on P laintiff ’ s A mended E mergency M otion to C ompel D eposition and M otion for S anctions for A buse of D iscovery; and A mended M otion for C ontinuance

.Page 2 of 2

the merits , and the orders were ent ered after relator had given notice of and filed a

motion to recuse.

Entitlement to man damus reli ef requires rela tor to show that the trial court

clearly abused its discretion and that he lack s an adequate appellate remedy. In re

Prudential Ins. Co ., 14 8 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding).

Based on our review of the petit ion and re cord , we conclud e relator ha s
failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, w e deny

the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8 (a).

220745f.p05 /s/ Lana Myers LANA MYERS JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

March 16, 2007

U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N. W. Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being submittedto the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for the purpose of complyingwith Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode. This certification is not to be deemed to be filed pursuant to theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part of the AnnualReport on Form 10-K (the “Report”) accompanying this letter and isnot to be incorporated by reference into any filing, whether made before orafter the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in suchfiling.

I, J. WilliamHolden, III, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofMirant Americas Generation, LLC (the “Company”), certify that, subject to thequalifications noted below, to the best of my knowledge:

1.                the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Mirant Americas Generation,LLC.
| Name:    |     | /s/ J. WILLIAM  HOLDEN, III                    |
|----------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| * * | * * | *Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Mirant Americas Generation, LLC andwill be retained by Mirant Americas Generation, LLC and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Table 21
                                       U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                              Central Valley Operations Office

                                       Central Valley Project - California
Monthly Diversions in AF                              2002

                            Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct    Nov    Dec  Total

CANALS

Contra Costa               13049   9404   9967  14486   6768  24424  20276   5951   4683   4259   4197   3461 120925
Delta-Mendota             254400 199820 256707 127398  52580 150595 267309 266195 254147 250896 218052 2046042502703
Actual Fed Dos Amigos      40075  84854  72021  88937 110301 180906 198922 113099  37304  45702  30044  300681032233
Madera                         0      0      0   3783  27261  11145  63589  42905  12647      0      0      0 161330
Friant-Kern                11328  30796  29060  48191  87351 167312 169986 122791  67017  47465   5472   3025 789794
Corning                        0      0    422   1745   2588   3632   3917   3578   2900   1827    315      0  20924
Folsom-South                1553   1553   1805   2289   2307  36181   2656   2594   2626   2684   2442   1892  60582
Sly Park - Camino Conduit   1097    908    774   1359   2204   2856   3685   3858   3598   2602   1386   1174  25501
Tehama-Colusa                  0   1636  13446  19095  36871  59013  55502  37425  18078  10868   1283      0 253217

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel             1872   2225   2761   2875   3681   3397   3685   3597   2827   2467   2164   1715  33266

KLAMATH PROJECT

"A" Canal Upper Klamath        0      0    320  28420  27150  50840  55800  52190  17470  11860      0      0 244050
Klamath Drainage District  25120   7580    604  11250  10002  11680  14700  15130   8820   7560  13220  18798 144464
Clear Lake Reservoir           0      0      0    140   5730   7340  21110   9470   6300      0      0      0  50090
Gerber Reservoir               0      0      0    800   6400   8060   9180   8170   6990      0      0      0  39600
Klamath River to Lost Riv      0      0      0   6300   5000  21900  10450   3790      0      0      0      0  47440

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek                    0      0   2432  15731  14641  18250  20608  18240  14529   9489    333      0 114253
South Canal                    0      0   1682  10122   9526  12121  13892  12298   9388   6278    206      0  75513
North Canal                    0      0    750   5609   5115   6129   6716   5942   5141   3211    127      0  38740

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal           3319   2906   3669  17629  28007  36181  37450  31387  23078  11879   2571   3219 201295


NA = Not Available at time of printing report.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFROMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 10-Q FOR IOWA FIRST BANCSHARES CORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          14,235
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     68,763
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        178,632
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 275,028
<DEPOSITS>                                     236,292
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,923
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,041
<LONG-TERM>                                      2,474
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,098
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 275,028
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,372
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,904
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   711
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,987
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,772
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,214
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,773
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      100
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,018
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,978
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,650
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,650
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        902
<LOANS-PAST>                                       205
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                       428
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,737
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,737
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00263-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.E.G., a Child

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-00199

Honorable Norma Gonzales, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 19, 2019

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of 

service to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM