alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Decarlos D. COLEMAN, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-7527.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 23, 2006.

Decided: March 2, 2006.

DeCarlos D. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

DeCarlos D. Coleman, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order * denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a *769constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the magistrate judge’s assessment of his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the magistrate judge are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Coleman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Coleman’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*

*

 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
p. 1



# OAR Box 1672 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# ^5£)ll-C-2 9 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/30/200811:01:00AM Sheet 58of 132P. 2 Author* ; STEV

E SHED D <SHEDD.STEVE@epamail.epa.gov > a t Interne t Date : 5/15/9 8 4:1 1 PM Priority ! Norma l A9 8 1 3 BCC : JAHEREDO a t WC-SANTA_BARBAR A11*0 / ~Z^ TO : JAHEREDO@wcc.coma t INTERNE T CC : bhaneke@rtp.pes.coma t INTERNE T CC : glaflam@rtp.pes.coma t INTERNE T Subject : Informatio nReques t fo r OL D -Repl y Messag e Content s Joan , AAP L shoul d restat e wha t yo u hav e belo wi na lette r t o m e o r Bruc e Jorda n(t o m yattention) . On e clarificatio ni s th e terminolog

yyo u use d belo wstate s emission s ar e base d o ndesig ncapacity . Th e cutof f i nou r instruction s ar e base d on5/12. 5 ton s o f actua l HAP emissions . Pleas e confirmand stat e i nth e lette r tha t th e plan t sit e actua l emission s ar e belo wth e 5 o r 12. 5 ton s o f HA P criteria . I f yo u hav e an

yquestion s o nthe abov e pleas e contac t m e again . Stev e Shed

d

Stephe nShed

d U.S . EP A Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning and Standard s Researc hTriangl e Park , N C 2771 1 voice : (919 ) 541-539 7 fax : (919 ) 541-024 6 E-mail : shedd.steve@epa.go v > » <JAHEREDO@wcc.com > 05/15/9 8 01:47p m> » Dea r Steve , Onbehal f o f Al l America nPipelin e (AAPL) , I woul d lik e t o obtai n clarificatio no nth e submitta l o f informatio nrequeste d fo r OL D sources . AAP L own s and operate s a crud e oi l pipelin e tha t run s from Californi a t o Texas . The yoperat e si xpum p station s whic har e majo r source s o f criteri a pollutants , howeve r al l hav e HA P emission s belo w 2. 5 ton s pe r yea r base d o ndesig ncapacity . Thes e emissio nestimate s ar e documente d throughsubmitta l o f Titl e V application s t o th e approriat e loca l ai r agency . Th e primarysourc e o f emission s a t thes e facilitie s ar e turbine s whic har e use d t o operat e pump s t o facilitat e crud e movemen t throughth e pipeline . Onl yon e facilit yha s crud e oi l storag e capacity . AAP 1 als o ha s severa l smalle r pum p station s whic h ar e no t majo r source s o f criteri a o r HAP emissions . Based o nthe estimate d emission s an d the guidanc e provide d i nyou r Apri l 29 , 199 8 reques t fo r information, , i t i s understoo d tha t AAP L wil l no t hav e t o submi t detaile d informatio no nfacilit yoperations . Specifically , Enclosur e 1 pag e 2 state s tha t facilitie s whic hd o no t mee t the larg e sourc e criteri a onl ynee d t o submi t thi s finding i n writing t o th e EPA . Pleas e specif ywha t informatio nneed s t o b e include d i nth e lette r t o the EPA .
Exhibit 13.1

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each undersigned officer of Anheuser-Busch InBev
SA/NV (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended 31 December 2011 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                               
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------
|Date: 12 April 2012 |  | By: |  | /s/ Carlos Brito              
|                    |  |     |  | Name: Carlos Brito            
|                    |  |     |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |    
|Date: 12 April 2012 |  | By: |  | /s/ Felipe Dutra              
|                    |  |     |  | Name: Felipe Dutra            
|                    |  |     |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
### §4138. Access to records

#### (a) Review by Foreign Service Grievance Board of decision denying access

If a grievant is denied access to any agency record prior to or during the consideration of the grievance by the Department, the grievant may raise such denial before the Board in connection with the grievance.

#### (b) Access by Foreign Service Grievance Board; relevant and material records; adverse effect on national security or foreign policy

In considering a grievance, the Board shall have access to any agency record as follows:

(1)(A) The Board shall request access to any agency record which the grievant requests to substantiate the grievance if the Board determines that such record may be relevant and material to the grievance.

(B) The Board may request access to any other agency record which the Board determines may be relevant and material to the grievance.

(2) Any agency shall make available to the Board any agency record requested under paragraph (1) unless the head or deputy head of such agency personally certifies in writing to the Board that disclosure of the record to the Board and the grievant would adversely affect the foreign policy or national security of the United States or that such disclosure is prohibited by law. If such a certification is made with respect to any record, the agency shall supply to the Board a summary or extract of such record unless the reasons specified in the preceding sentence preclude such a summary or extract.

#### (c) Access by grievant

If the Board determines that an agency record, or a summary or extract of a record, made available to the Board under subsection (b) is relevant and material to the grievance, the agency concerned shall make such record, summary, or extract, as the case may be, available to the grievant.

#### (d) Denial of access as factor in determination of grievance

In considering a grievance, the Board may take into account the fact that the grievant or the Board was denied access to an agency record which the Board determines is or may be relevant and material to the grievance.

#### (e) Proceedings and decisions of Foreign Service Grievance Board

The grievant in any case decided by the Board shall have access to the record of the proceedings and the decision of the Board.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §1108, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2147.)
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-40802

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

KEVIN DEAN EVANS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:10-CR-153-1

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Kevin Dean Evans

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Evans has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-40802 Document: 00511571577 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/15/2011
No. 10-40802

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-40802 Document: 00511571577 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/15/2011
#### Emma F. Sully v. Tiffany and Company.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present —Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1171504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7855183
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (447644)
<INVENTORY>                                   12955118
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              22668336
<PP&E>                                        14102860
<DEPRECIATION>                                12233262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                25721696
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1683177
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         27111
<OTHER-SE>                                    21153824
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  25721696
<SALES>                                       33188174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              33188174
<CGS>                                         20332280
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 20332280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               67932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                6999189
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2681000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4318189
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39


</TABLE>
#### Frances Glebocki, as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Glebocki, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 27793.)

) Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing a claim against the State for the alleged wrongful death of claimant’s intestate. The body of the intestate was found during the early morning hours of February 14, 1944, on a bridge maintained by the State which spans the Mohawk River from the city of Cohoes to Waterford. There is strong proof to the effect that the intestate was struck by a motorist who was negligently driving a car that was without adequate lights and in a generally defective condition. The court below found that no act or omission on the part of the State in the construction and maintenance of the bridge contributed to the happening of the accident. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffeman, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.
Table 29

U. S. Department of the Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley - Streamflow Data

Preliminary-Subject to Change 2019

Mean monthly flow in cfs

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Sacramento River

Shasta computed inflow 12830 20837 23167

At Keswick 3587 3391 24949

At Bend Bridge 12281 17055 37157

At Vina Bridge 16131 25681 44005

At Ord Ferry 18034 31078 50144

At Colusa 17921 26350 40267

Below Wilkins Slough 15603 20772 26220

At Verona 29003 44772 55671

Sacramento at "I" Street 30824 52988 67030

Miscellaneous Stations

Folsom computed inflow 5272 11572 11325

American R at Nimbus Dam 1762 10924 9680

Kings River at Pine Flat 93 74 4206

San Joaquin River

At Friant Dam 409 530 1582

Near Vernalis 1538 8539 15684

Putah Creek

Berryessa computed inflow 1707 5834 2346

Putah Creek - Lake Solano 113 857 3434

Stanislaus River

New Melones computed inflow 1423 3244 4074

At Tulloch Dam 229 1173 4434

At Orange Blossom 184 1278 4207

* Data supplied by Central Valley Operations Office

 Daily mean is derived from 7 am daily reading.
### §2431. Review of programs

#### (a) Review

In the development of the Memorandum of Agreement required by section 2411 of this title, the Secretary of the Interior, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in cooperation with the Secretary of Education shall review and consider—

(1) Federal programs providing education services or benefits to Indian children,

(2) tribal, State, local, and private educational resources and programs,

(3) Federal programs providing family and social services and benefits for Indian families and children,

(4) Federal programs relating to youth employment, recreation, cultural, and community activities, and

(5) tribal, State, local, and private resources for programs similar to those cited in paragraphs (3) and (4),

to determine their applicability and relevance in carrying out the purposes of this chapter.

#### (b) Publication

The results of the review conducted under subsection (a) shall be provided to each Indian tribe as soon as possible for their consideration and use in the development or modification of a Tribal Action Plan under section 2412 of this title.

(Pub. L. 99–570, title IV, §4211, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–143; Pub. L. 111–211, title II, §241(a)(6), July 29, 2010, 124 Stat. 2289.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–211 inserted ", the Attorney General," after "the Secretary of the Interior" in introductory provisions.
##### 



Exhibit 32a LNB Bancorp, Inc. Exhibit to Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 (For the three months ended March 31, 2004) Exhibit Number (32(a)) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
James F. Kidd, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ James F. Kidd James F. Kidd
President and
Chief Executive Officer
May 11, 2004
### §1300j–7. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–323, §8, Sept. 21, 1994, 108 Stat. 2154, which related to jurisdiction over lands taken into trust by the Secretary of the Interior for the benefit of the band, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.38

 130.15

 130.03

 129.61

 129.23

 129.49

 129.48

 129.46

 129.62

 129.87

 128.95

 129.38

 129.40

 129.43

 129.27

 129.13

 129.37

 129.50

 129.73

 129.78

 130.02

 130.11

 129.97

 130.14

 130.09

 130.00

 130.00

 130.15

 130.04

 129.99

 621

 596

 584

 542

 506

 530

 529

 527

 543

 567

 481

 520

 522

 525

 509

 497

 519

 531

 554

 558

 583

 592

 578

 595

 590

 581

 581

 596

 585

 580

STORAGE

+55

-25

-12

-42

-36

+24

-1

-2

+16

+24

-86

+39

+2

+3

-16

-12

+22

+12

+23

+4

+25

+9

-14

+17

-5

-9

+0

+15

-11

-5

CHANGE

2,934

3,000

3,912

4,618

4,791

4,560

4,226

4,010

3,751

3,241

3,279

5,445

6,363

6,063

5,512

5,443

5,348

4,887

4,823

4,169

3,442

2,815

2,593

2,414

2,248

2,114

1,963

1,830

1,735

1,585

INFLOW

 2,846

 2,953

 3,858

 4,585

 4,759

 4,494

 4,168

 3,951

 3,683

 3,172

 3,270

 5,373

 6,312

 6,011

 5,469

 5,399

 5,287

 4,831

 4,749

 4,101

 3,363

 2,741

 2,530

 2,319

 2,152

 2,014

 1,857

 1,695

 1,594

 1,432

PUTAH

 60

 60

 60

 54

 50

 54

 59

 60

 60

 57

 52

 52

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 62

 65

 65

 69

 70

 85

 99

 105

 105

 126

 146

 155

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .07

 .11

 .00

 .06

 .02

 .09

 .12

 .10

 .13

 .09

 .06

 .00

 .03

 .15

 .19

 .06

 .11

 .10

 .12

 .45

 .22

 .07

 .13

 .15

 .11

 .09

 .21

 .34

 .24

 .24

INCHES

 .25

 .06

 1.37

 .15

 .48

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .01

 .00

 .31

 1.61

 .50

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

APRIL 2006 RUN DATE: 08/09/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +14 113,114 2,130 110,968 8 3.86 5.33

ACRE-FEET +14 224,362 4,225 220,105 16

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 220,105

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 4,225

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.33

JULY 1, 2005 36.08

 566

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Coinage Act of 1873

              														Coinage Act of 1873, February 12, 1873.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1095,			accessed on September 4, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
§ 2521.4 When lands may be sold, taxed, or mortgaged. ( a ) After final proof and payment have been made the land may be sold and conveyed to another person without the approval of the Bureau of Land Management, but all such conveyances are nevertheless subject to the superior rights of the United States, and the title so contained would fall if it should be finally determined that the entry was illegal or that the entryman had failed to comply with the law.
( b ) Lands embraced in unperfected desert-land entries are not subject to taxation by the State authorities, nor to levy and sale under execution to satisfy judgments against the entrymen, except as hereinafter set forth in this section.
( c ) Lands embraced in desert-land entries within an irrigation district which the Secretary of the Interior has approved under the Act of August 11, 1916 (39 Stat. 506; 43 U.S.C. 621-630), may be taxed and otherwise dealt with as provided by said act, and lands in desert-land entries within irrigation projects constructed under the Reclamation Act may be taxed as provided for by the Act of June 13, 1930 (46 Stat. 581; 43 U.S.C. 455, 455a-455c).
( d ) A desert-land entryman may, however, mortgage his interest in the entered land if, by the laws of the State in which the land is situated, a mortgage of land is regarded as merely creating a lien thereon and not as a conveyance thereof. The purchaser at a sale had for the foreclosure of such mortgage may be recognized as assignee upon furnishing proof of his qualifications to take a desert-land entry by assignment. Transferees, after final proof, mortgagees, or other encumbrancers may file in the proper office written notice stating the nature of their claims, and they will there upon become entitled to receive notice of any action taken by the Bureau of Land Management with reference to the entry.
( e ) The filing of all notices of recordation of claim by transferees, mortgagees or other encumbrancer under this section must be accompanied by a service charge of $10 which will not be returnable.
action when parole has been denied. See NRS 213.10705; Niergarth v.

State, 105 Nev. 26, 28, 768 P.2d 882, 883 (1989). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

J. Douglas

cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge Phillip Bryon Ashdown Attorney General/Carson City Carson City District Attorney Carson City Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Charles N. Pinkney and Another, Appellants.

Judgments affirmed. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §1780k. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–286, §13, Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1228, which provided for boundaries between the Pueblo of Santa Clara and the Pueblo de San Ildefonso, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.