alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4. Defective record of deeds and papers legalized

The recording of all deeds and papers prior to July 26, 1892, in the office of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs is confirmed, approved, and legalized; and said record theretofore made shall be deemed, taken, and held to be good and valid and shall have all the force and effect and be entitled to the same credit as if it had been made in pursuance of and in conformity to law. But shall have no effect whatever upon the validity or invalidity of the deed or paper so recorded, and shall be no evidence of constructive notice to any persons not actually knowing the contents.

(July 26, 1892, ch. 256, §1, 27 Stat. 272.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 14

- 00329

- CV

FARIHA ASHFAQ , Appellant

V.

MOHAMMAD ASHFAQ , Appellee

Appeal from the 246th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- 60365).

TO THE 246TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 28th day of April 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on September 27, 2013. After submitting

the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the

Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered April 28, 2015.Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale. Opinion delivered by Justice Bland.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 13, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
§ 2.24 How will the bureau deny requests? ( a ) The bureau must notify you in writing of any denial of your request.
( b ) The denial notification must include: ( 1 ) The name and title or position of the person responsible for the denial, along with an office phone number or email address;
( 2 ) A statement of the reasons for the denial;
( 3 ) A reference to any FOIA exemption applied by the bureau to withhold records in full or in part, along with a statement that the bureau reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by the applied exemption(s) or disclosure is prohibited by law;
( 4 ) An estimate of the volume of any records withheld in full or in part (for example, by providing the number of pages or some other reasonable form of estimation), unless the bureau notes that it does not have or could not locate responsive records or that including an estimate would harm an interest protected by an exemption used to withhold the records and the bureau explains this harm to you;
( 5 ) The name and title of the Office of the Solicitor or Office of General Counsel attorney consulted (if the bureau is denying a fee waiver request or withholding all or part of a requested record); and
( 6 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under subpart H of this part and a description of the procedures in subpart H of this part.
[77 FR 76902, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 11129, Mar. 3, 2016; 81 FR 92694, Dec. 20, 2016; 84 FR 61828, Nov. 14, 2019]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation of the Tone Fan Noise Design/Prediction System (TFaNS) at the NASA Glenn Research CenterVersion 1.4 of TFaNS, the Tone Fan Noise Design/Prediction System. has recently been evaluated at the NASA Glenn Research Center. Data from tests of the Allison Ultra High Bypass Fan (UHBF) were used to compare to predicted farfield directivities for the radial stator configuration. There was good agreement between measured and predicted directivities at low fan speeds when rotor effects were neglected in the TFaNS calculations. At higher fan speeds, TFaNS is shown to be useful in predicting overall trends rather than absolute sound pressure levels.Document ID20000014308Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeOtherAuthorsKoch, L. Danielle*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1999Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberE-12011Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-81-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000014308.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Domenic L. AMATO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent.

No. 06-3096.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2006.

Domenic L. Amato, pro se.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            1990
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1999
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               90
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1909
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1999
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    25
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    50
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (25)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (25)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (25)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4434 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2016 

Mr. GIBSON (for himself, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. TONKO, and Mr. COLLINS of New 

York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 13287, the 

8 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

9 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

10 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requireVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:02 Feb 03, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4434.IH H4434

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4434 IH

1 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

2 under that section, extend the time period during which 

3 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

4 the project for up to 4 consecutive 2-year periods from 

5 the date of the expiration of the time period required for 

6 commencement of construction prescribed in the license. 

7 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

8 period required for commencement of construction of the 

9 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

11 reinstate the license effective as of the date of its expira12 tion and the first extension authorized under subsection 

13 (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 170

 194

 219

 197

 200

 271

 265

 263

 284

 259

 247

 266

 263

 256

 232

 225

 227

 224

 235

 258

 263

 247

 255

 263

 263

 256

 245

 265

 261

 240

 246

 141

 151

 157

 165

 175

 180

 188

 196

 194

 192

 201

 206

 201

 195

 196

 194

 194

 194

 192

 175

 200

 203

 204

 204

 204

 203

 200

 200

 199

 192

 189

 152

 160

 179

 176

 188

 203

 216

 222

 217

 212

 216

 228

 222

 217

 209

 208

 206

 208

 212

 220

 218

 224

 228

 229

 230

 222

 217

 223

 225

 217

 212

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 440.94

 442.71

 444.46

 446.18

 447.89

 449.15

 450.40

 451.64

 452.85

 454.05

 455.68

 457.28

 458.87

 460.44

 462.05

 463.60

 464.87

 466.04

 466.84

 467.98

 468.76

 469.50

 470.33

 471.14

 471.86

 472.92

 473.72

 474.66

 475.36

 476.07

 476.77

 883,841

 900,893

 917,860

 934,640

 951,423

 963,853

 976,238

 988,576

 1,000,664

 1,012,701

 1,029,128

 1,045,336

 1,061,526

 1,077,592

 1,094,150

 1,110,168

 1,123,348

 1,135,536

 1,143,894

 1,155,838

 1,164,033

 1,171,825

 1,180,585

 1,189,153

 1,196,787

 1,208,053

 1,216,578

 1,226,619

 1,234,114

 1,241,752

 1,249,284

STORAGE

+17,037

+17,052

+16,967

+16,780

+16,783

+12,430

+12,385

+12,338

+12,088

+12,037

+16,427

+16,208

+16,190

+16,066

+16,558

+16,018

+13,180

+12,188

+8,358

+11,944

+8,195

+7,792

+8,760

+8,568

+7,634

+11,266

+8,525

+10,041

+7,495

+7,638

+7,532

CHANGE

8,983

8,963

8,953

8,931

8,901

7,245

6,566

6,488

6,460

6,446

8,715

8,682

8,668

8,612

8,643

8,610

7,113

6,621

4,637

6,542

3,052

4,270

4,407

4,722

4,250

6,100

4,581

5,408

4,130

4,130

4,287

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 165

 164

 161

 152

 158

 147

 143

 158

 149

 152

 144

 144

 140

 134

 129

 127

 132

 126

 124

 114

 127

 131

 119

 123

 130

 116

 116

 118

 119

 127

 136

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-228

-202

-238

-319

-282

-832

-179

-109

-217

-225

-289

-366

-366

-378

-167

-408

-336

-350

-300

-406

+1,207

-211

+129

-280

-272

-304

-167

-227

-232

-153

-354

OR

 22

 31

 44

 28

 10

 16

 22

 23

 0

 13

 10

 23

 17

 17

 10

 13

 47

 30

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 0

 28

 14

 17

 21

 17

 17

 10

C.F.S.

 .07

 .10

 .14

 .09

 .03

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .14

 .09

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .00

 .08

 .04

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .27

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .25

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .51

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR January 31, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2016 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +382,480 204,116 0 4,225 0 -7,061 585 1.77 1.23

ACRE-FEET +382,480 404,864 0 8,380 0 -14,005 1,160

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 8,380 TOTAL 8,380

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2016 TO DATE = 3.86

 866,804

SPILL 0 1.23

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 3.86
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 20, 2013

NO. 03-13-00688-CV

Rodgy Lee Nesby, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 33RD DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

The Court being of the opinion that it is without jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal 

should therefore be dismissed for want of jurisdiction: Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication 

of costs is made.
### §4102. Administration through Office of Native American Programs

The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall carry out this chapter through the Office of Native American Programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.

(Pub. L. 104–330, §3, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4018.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 104–330, Oct. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 4016, known as the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4101 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1997, except as otherwise expressly provided, see section 107 of Pub. L. 104–330, set out as a note under section 4101 of this title.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Unemployment in the United States

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Education and Labor, 1870-1946					 and 	Seventieth Congress, 1927-1929. 						*Unemployment in the United States : Hearings Before the Committee on Education and Labor, United States Senate, Seventieth Congress, Second Session, Pursuant to S. Res. 219, December 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, and 19, 1928, January 9 and 14, February 7, 8, and 9, 1929*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										December 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, and 19, 1928, January 9 and 14, February 7, 8, and 9, 1929,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/98,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 14, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133154 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133154 

 COA: 274819 

Wayne CC: 05-001492-01 

ERNEST GRAY JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 14, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The denial is 

without prejudice to the defendant’s right to file a motion for relief from judgment 

pursuant to MCR 6.500 et seq. Moreover, if defendant chooses to file such a motion, the 

trial court, and not the Attorney Grievance Commission, would be the appropriate forum 

to conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding defendant’s claim that his counsel had a 

conflict of interest, should it determine that an evidentiary hearing is required. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would remand this case to the trial court for treatment 

of the defendant's motions as a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to MCR 6.500 

et seq. and, if necessary, for an evidentiary hearing regarding the defendant’s claim that 

his counsel had a conflict of interest. 

p0911 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 14, 2007 

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 2,363.54

 2,363.79

 2,363.92

 2,364.01

 2,363.94

 2,363.72

 2,363.49

 2,363.43

 2,363.36

 2,363.36

 2,363.36

 2,363.41

 2,363.51

 2,363.62

 2,363.85

 2,363.95

 2,363.98

 2,363.93

 2,363.85

 2,363.85

 2,363.86

 2,363.74

 2,363.59

 2,363.40

 2,363.19

 2,363.00

 2,362.86

 2,362.72

 2,362.60

 2,362.47

 2,362.37

 2,342.8

 2,346.8

 2,348.9

 2,350.3

 2,349.2

 2,345.7

 2,342.1

 2,341.1

 2,340.0

 2,340.0

 2,340.0

 2,340.8

 2,342.4

 2,344.1

 2,347.8

 2,349.4

 2,349.8

 2,349.1

 2,347.8

 2,347.8

 2,347.9

 2,346.0

 2,343.6

 2,340.6

 2,337.3

 2,334.3

 2,332.0

 2,329.8

 2,327.9

 2,325.9

 2,324.3

STORAGE

+4.6

+4.0

+2.1

+1.4

-1.1

-3.5

-3.7

-1.0

-1.1

+0.0

+0.0

+0.8

+1.6

+1.8

+3.7

+1.6

+0.5

-0.8

-1.3

+0.0

+0.2

-1.9

-2.4

-3.0

-3.3

-3.0

-2.2

-2.2

-1.9

-2.1

-1.6

CHANGE

5,783

4,615

4,511

4,110

3,732

3,642

3,894

5,299

5,253

5,014

4,379

4,553

5,075

5,266

6,178

5,521

4,419

3,585

3,477

3,893

3,572

3,024

2,775

2,225

2,279

1,996

2,098

2,054

2,296

2,378

2,766

INFLOW

 3,325

 2,501

 3,421

 3,388

 3,453

 3,517

 3,623

 3,633

 3,687

 3,601

 3,511

 3,406

 3,406

 3,448

 3,377

 3,474

 3,393

 3,363

 3,347

 3,412

 3,375

 3,472

 3,255

 3,277

 3,283

 3,451

 3,126

 3,082

 3,160

 3,327

 3,401

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 738

 1,777

 2,037

 2,011

 2,011

 1,282

 737

 624

 730

 833

 833

 1,128

 644

 539

 678

 336

 0

 402

 582

 356

 560

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 131

 108

 47

 0

 103

 113

 80

 136

 117

 131

 131

 122

 136

 103

 122

 117

 141

 84

 94

 145

 117

 113

 141

 117

 121

 70

 89

 89

 93

 88

 163

C.F.S.

 .28

 .23

 .10

 .00

 .22

 .24

 .17

 .29

 .25

 .28

 .28

 .26

 .29

 .22

 .26

 .25

 .30

 .18

 .20

 .31

 .25

 .24

 .30

 .25

 .26

 .15

 .19

 .19

 .20

 .19

 .35

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 15, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -13.8 119,662 104,495 0 18,838 3,362 7.18 .08

ACRE-FEET -13,800 237,350 207,266 0 37,365 6,669

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 207,266

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 37,365

 244,631

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .08

JULY 1, 2011 25.51

 2,338.2

Table 4

(1) (1)