alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 833.33

 835.68

 837.98

 837.76

 837.80

 837.87

 837.71

 837.70

 837.80

 837.85

 837.95

 838.17

 838.50

 838.84

 839.18

 839.53

 840.22

 841.00

 840.73

 840.36

 840.43

 840.47

 840.48

 840.43

 840.33

 840.23

 840.14

 840.03

 839.95

 839.81

 839.66

 40.96

 43.74

 46.55

 46.27

 46.32

 46.41

 46.21

 46.20

 46.32

 46.39

 46.51

 46.78

 47.20

 47.62

 48.05

 48.50

 49.38

 50.38

 50.04

 49.56

 49.65

 49.70

 49.71

 49.65

 49.52

 49.39

 49.27

 49.13

 49.03

 48.85

 48.66

STORAGE

+0.37

+2.77

+2.81

-0.27

+0.05

+0.09

-0.20

-0.01

+0.12

+0.06

+0.12

+0.28

+0.41

+0.43

+0.43

+0.45

+0.88

+1.01

-0.35

-0.48

+0.09

+0.05

+0.01

-0.07

-0.13

-0.13

-0.12

-0.14

-0.10

-0.18

-0.19

CHANGE

215

1,427

2,139

1,506

893

716

573

452

411

379

302

326

278

256

254

253

473

535

428

386

377

356

341

299

266

268

275

264

286

247

239

INFLOW

 20

 20

 140

 989

 215

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 6

 6

 581

 650

 650

 650

 650

 433

 325

 325

 217

 163

 44

 16

 16

 6

 6

 6

 579

 601

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

OUTLET

 2

 3

 2

 4

 3

 2

 3

 5

 4

 3

 3

 4

 5

 5

 2

 3

 3

 2

 4

 5

 5

 3

 7

 5

 4

 6

 6

 8

 11

 9

 8

C.F.S.

 .05

 .08

 .05

 .11

 .08

 .06

 .07

 .13

 .10

 .07

 .08

 .09

 .12

 .12

 .05

 .08

 .08

 .06

 .10

 .13

 .12

 .08

 .17

 .12

 .11

 .15

 .15

 .20

 .27

 .23

 .20

INCHES

 .35

 1.23

 .10

 .09

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 RUN DATE: 04/01/2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +8.06 15,420 9,307 1,904 139 3.51 1.85

ACRE-FEET +8,060 30,586 18,460 3,777 276

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 3,777

OUTLET

TOTAL

 18,460

 22,237

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.85

JULY 1, 2008 11.88

 40.59

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
Exhibit 99.1



RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) CERTIFICATION



I, Gary Borglund, President, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of NVCN Corporation;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period] for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)  [omitted pursuant to extended compliance period]



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Dated  April__, 2008

By: /s/  Gary Borglund





Gary Borglund, Principal Executive Officer and



Principal Financial Officer

#
§ 679.340 What is meant by the terms “optimum policy-making authority” and “demonstrated experience and expertise”? For purposes of selecting representatives to Local WDBs: ( a ) A representative with “optimum policy-making authority” is an individual who can reasonably be expected to speak affirmatively on behalf of the entity he or she represents and to commit that entity to a chosen course of action.
( b ) A representative with “demonstrated experience and expertise” means an individual who: ( 1 ) Is a workplace learning advisor as defined in WIOA sec. 3(70);
( 2 ) Contributes to the field of workforce development, human resources, training and development, or a core program function; or
( 3 ) The Local WDB recognizes for valuable contributions in education or workforce development related fields.
Second Department,

April, 1948.

(April 1, 1948.)

#### Louis Appelbaum, Appellant, v. Frieda Appelbaum, Respondent.

The motion is referred to the court that rendered the decision. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ. Motion for reargument granted and on reargument the decision of this court handed down March 22, 1948 *(ante,*p. 911), is amended to read as follows: In an action for divorce, order awarding alimony *pendente lite*and counsel fees modified on the facts by reducing the amount awarded as counsel fee from $1,500 to $1,000, and by striking from said order the following provision at folio 16: *“*with leave to defendant to apply to the Justice before whom this, case comes on for trial for such other and additional counsel fees as may then appear to be or have been warranted.” As thus modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. The reduced counsel fee shall be paid as follows: $500 within five days from the entry of the order hereon, and the remainder when the case is reached for trial. On this record the allowance for counsel fee was excessive. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Armkel, LLC (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert A. Davies,
III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Armkel, LLC and will be retained by Armkel, LLC and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                     By:    /s/ Robert A. Davies, III
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:   Robert A. Davies, III
                                            Title:  Chief Executive Officer

                                     Dated: March 27, 2003
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

Marbleton

Big Piney

Merna Cora

Daniel

Pinedale

Boulder

LaBarge

T25N

R114W

T26N

T27N

T28N

T29N

T30N

T31N

T32N

T33N

T34N

T35N

T36N

R113W R112W R111W R110W R109W R108W R107W R106W

UV352

UV354

UV353

UV350

UV351

£¤191

£¤189

UV235

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BLM FOR USE OF THE DATA FOR PURPOSES NOT INTENDED BY BLM.

o

0 2.5 5 10 15 20 25 30

Miles

Big Game Crucial Winter Range

SUBLETTE Map 3-20

LINCOLN

0 5 10 20 30 40 50

Kilometers

Elk

Mule Deer

Pronghorn

Moose
### §172. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(f)(1), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3380

Section, act Aug. 7, 1882, ch. 433, 22 Stat. 330, related to sale of surplus products and waste materials of Saint Elizabeths Hospital.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER XLIII—CATAWBA TRIBE OF SOUTH CAROLINA: DIVISION OF ASSETS
#### Mollie Roth et al., Respondents, v. Prudential Life Insurance Company of America, Defendant, and Gustave Kase, Defendant-Appellant.

*873Hagarty, Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report of InferX Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of
the Company, hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:  April
      15, 2009By:
                /s/ B.K. GogiaB.K.
      GogiaChief
      Executive OfficerDated:  April
      15, 2009By:
                /s/ B.K. GogiaB.K.
      GogiaPrincipal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
  The above
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or
as a separate disclosure document.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 4326

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTONIO EUGENE RANDOLPH , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1:16

- cr - 00368

- NCT

- 1 )

Submitted : May 23, 2018 Decided: June 6, 2018

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Kathleen A. Gleason, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney , Eric L. Iverson, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Eugene Randolph appeals the district court’s denial of his pretrial motion to suppress after entering a conditional guilty plea to receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A), (b)(1) (2012). Randolph challenges the same warrant that we addressed in United States v . McLamb , 880 F.3d 685 (4th Cir. 2018), contending the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm. On appeal, Randolph’s central argument is that the warrant did not authorize the Government to search property outside the Eastern District of Virginia. Alternatively, he contends the warrant was issued in violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 41, and the evidence should have been suppressed. We conclude these arguments are without merit, and the district court did not err in denying his mo tion to suppress. See McLamb , 880 F.3d at 689

- 91; United States v. Werdene , 883 F.3d 204, 208, 214, 218

- 19 (3d Cir. 2018). The warrant authorized deployment of a network investigative technique on any computer user who logged into the target website; and even if this violated the 2015 version of Rule 41, suppression would not produce an appreciable deterrence on law enforcement. Accordingly, we affi rm the district court’s judgment

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions ar e adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Mission Statement 

It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, 

diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of 

present and future generations. 

BLM/WY/PL-09/014+1610
#### BARBOUR, Appellant, v. FINKE, et al, Respondents.

(217 N. W. 678.)

(File No. 6410.

Opinion filed February 4, 1928.)

*392For former opinion, see 216 N. W. 592.

*Parliman & Parliman,*of Sioux Falls, for Appellant.

*Lewis Benson*and *Rice & Rice,*all of Flandreau, for Respondents.

MISER, C.

This is ah appeal from the clerk’s taxation of costs and disbursements, in the case of the same title reported in 216 N. W. 592. Respondent contends that the amount allowed for printing appellant’s abstract is excessive. Inasmuch as no application had been made for an order eliminating unnecessary matter, it was the duty of the clerk to overrule respondent’s objection. It is, however, the duty of the court, upon this appeal, to determine what, if any, portions of the abstract are unnecessary. McVay v. Tousley, 20 S. D. 487, 107 N. W. 828. At the trial in circuit court, the facts were stipulated. Respondent contends that pages 18 to 70 of appellant’s abstract are consumed in setting forth verbatim copies of the files in the foreclosure proceedings wherein appellant herein was plaintiff and Bertha Finke et al, none of whom were parties herein, were defendants, to which *393foreclosure reference is made in the former opinion. In appellant’s abstract, on the pages complained of, appellant sets forth the summons, complaint, answer of Bertha Finke, separate answer of Eli Finke, findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment of the court, sheriff’s certificate of sale issued on such foreclosure proceeding, and the sheriff’s deed thereafter issued to appellant. The only attempt apparently made by appellant to condense the contents of these voluminous files in the foreclosure proceedings was to omit the title of the action. Even the verifications were given in hsec verba. Yet these were the files in a case which had been affirmed by this court in 47 S. D. 644, 201 N. W. 711, 40 A. L. R. 829, and no one contended in the present case that such proceedings were not effective for the purpose of foreclosing the rights of the defendants named therein. The printing of these files in the brief in haec verba, in addition to being confusing when referring to the pleadings, findings, and decree in the case properly before us, placed an unnecessary burden upon the court in its work of review and increased the expense of litigation. It violated rule 5 of this court, which requires appellant to set out a “concise and condensed” abstract of the settled record and “to epitomize” the evidence carefully. The penalty for such violation is found within rule 10 as follows:

“Nor shall any party be allowed for any portion of a brief which is clearly unnecessary to a proper presentation of the cause in this court.”

This does not require the objecting party to have the unnecessary portion stricken before being entitled to- object to the allowance of such unnecessary cost. McVay v. Tousley, supra. The clerk is directed to deduct from appellant’s costs the sum of $33.75, and, as thus modified, the taxation is affirmed.

B'URCH, P. J., and POLREY, SHERWOOD, CAMPBELL, and BROWN, JJ., concur.
§ 10010.11 Lead agencies. ( a ) The Commission will serve as lead, or, as appropriate, joint-lead agency for any NEPA procedure that is sponsored by or otherwise significantly involves the Commission.
( b ) The Commission will inform the Office of the Solicitor of any agreements to assume lead or joint-lead agency status.
( c ) A non-Federal agency may be designated as a joint lead agency if it has a duty to comply with a local or State environmental review requirement. Any non-Federal agency may be a cooperating agency by agreement. The Commission will consult with the Office of the Solicitor in cases where such non-Federal agencies are also applicants before the Commission to determine joint-lead agency responsibilities.
### §1544. Additional compensation to contractors of Federal agency

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a contractor of a Federal agency under any Act of Congress may be allowed an additional amount of compensation equal to 5 percent of the amount paid, or to be paid, to a subcontractor or supplier, in carrying out the contract if such subcontractor or supplier is an Indian organization or Indian-owned economic enterprise as defined in this chapter.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title V, §504, added Pub. L. 100–442, §7, Sept. 22, 1988, 102 Stat. 1765.)
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Theodore Tsagkaris.,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of Tari Inc.,  for the fiscal  year ended  March 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tari Inc.

Date:  June 29, 2007


/s/  Theodore Tsagkaris

------------------------------
Theodore Tsagkaris
Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Growth Fund XXII, LP (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |       /s/Steven D. Cordes  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                              |
|   | Date: August 12, 2011                               |
|   |                                                |
|   |       /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                             |
|   | Date: August 12, 2011                               |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### SUBCHAPTER I—RANGELAND AND FARMLAND ENHANCEMENT
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AE Biofuels, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric McAfee, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|By: | /s/ Eric McAfee        
|    | Eric McAfee            
|    | Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 15, 2009
### §1773j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 101–41, §12, June 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 89, which set out definitions for this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Howard F. Hill, Acting
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:   September 14, 2005                             /s/Howard F. Hill
                                                       -----------------
                                                       Howard F. Hill
                                                       Acting Chief Financial
                                                       Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to RF Industries, Ltd. and will be
retained by RF Industries, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.