alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 684.420 What are the planning requirements for receiving supplemental youth services funding?

Applicants eligible to apply for supplemental youth funding must describe the supplemental youth services they intend to provide in the 4-year plan that they will submit as part of the competitive application process. The information on youth services will be incorporated into the overall 4-year plan, which is more fully described in §§ 684.700 and 684.710, and is required for both adult and youth funds. As indicated in § 684.710(c), additional planning information required for applicants requesting supplemental youth funding will be provided in the FOA. The Department envisions that the strategy for youth funds will not be extensive; however, grantees will be required to provide the number of youth it plans to serve and projected performance outcomes. The Department also supports youth activities that preserve INA culture and will support strategies that promote INA values.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 128

 119

 126

 119

 134

 132

 114

 129

 121

 117

 119

 115

 119

 123

 117

 116

 121

 120

 117

 118

 123

 128

 119

 125

 113

 121

 112

 111

 116

 127

 122

 112

 109

 112

 112

 108

 108

 105

 105

 105

 105

 104

 105

 106

 110

 111

 109

 113

 111

 106

 104

 107

 104

 103

 103

 107

 108

 101

 104

 109

 107

 91

 116

 113

 119

 115

 112

 115

 110

 112

 112

 111

 112

 111

 111

 114

 114

 112

 116

 116

 112

 108

 116

 110

 112

 109

 111

 112

 108

 108

 112

 112

 110

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 11, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 17.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to the end that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of the Interior.

[29 FR 16293, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 43 FR 4259, Feb. 1, 1978]
### §1205. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–283, §5, June 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 313, which provided for certain moneys withheld from per capita distribution to be credited to a joint account for expenditure for official salaries and expenses of Fort Peck Tribes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Thin Oil Film EquationA thin film of oil on a surface responds primarily to the wall shear stress generated on that surface by a three-dimensional flow. The oil film is also subject to wall pressure gradients, surface tension effects and gravity. The partial differential equation governing the oil film flow is shown to be related to Burgers' equation. Analytical and numerical methods for solving the thin oil film equation are presented. A direct numerical solver is developed where the wall shear stress variation on the surface is known and which solves for the oil film thickness spatial and time variation on the surface. An inverse numerical solver is also developed where the oil film thickness spatial variation over the surface at two discrete times is known and which solves for the wall shear stress variation over the test surface. A One-Time-Level inverse solver is also demonstrated. The inverse numerical solver provides a mathematically rigorous basis for an improved form of a wall shear stress instrument suitable for application to complex three-dimensional flows. To demonstrate the complexity of flows for which these oil film methods are now suitable, extensive examination is accomplished for these analytical and numerical methods as applied to a thin oil film in the vicinity of a three-dimensional saddle of separation.Document ID19990047906Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBrown, James L.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Naughton, Jonathan W.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1999Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208767Rept-A-99V0007NASA/TM-1999-208767Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 519-20-22Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990047906.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(No. 4703

#### Ernest Bruzzichesi, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 8, 1957.*

S. W. Narusis, Attorney for Claimant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; Bernard Genis, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Fearer, J.

A claim has been filed for damages in the amount of $402.85 against the State of Illinois growing out of an accident, which occurred on September 19, 1955.

A hearing was had before Commissioner Immenhausen on September 19, 1956.

*475A motion to dismiss was filed on November 29, 1956, and a notice was served upon counsel for claimant. No other pleading having been filed by claimant, this matter comes on before the Court on the motion, supported by affidavit of Bernard Genis, asking for dismissal of this cause, with prejudice.

The basis for the motion is that, upon conclusion of the hearing before the Commissioner, claimant failed to file a transcript of the testimony, abstract, brief and argument, which are provided for by the rules of this Court. Furthermore, there has been no motion filed by claimant for an extension of time for the filing of the transcript of the evidence, exhibits, abstract, brief and argument.

Because of the failure of claimant to follow the rules of the Court in this reg’ard, and, because of the failure of claimant to come into Court after serving notice upon respondent asking for an extension of time to file the transcript and obtain a waiver for filing of abstract, brief and argument; and because of the failure of claimant to take any positive action upon being served with notice of the filing of the foregoing motion, it is the ruling of this Court that the motion to dismiss with prejudice be, and the same is hereby sustained.
#### Maria D’Inzillo, Appellant, v. Joseph Basile, Respondent.

*876No opinion. Present—Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ. [180 Misc. 237.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 509.37

 509.24

 508.29

 508.80

 508.66

 508.44

 508.81

 508.46

 507.31

 508.57

 509.29

 508.21

 508.99

 509.12

 508.37

 508.96

 509.11

 508.99

 508.44

 508.11

 508.24

 508.17

 508.27

 508.09

 508.40

 507.74

 508.52

 508.91

 508.99

 508.14

 66,182

 66,020

 64,846

 65,474

 65,301

 65,031

 65,486

 65,055

 63,653

 65,191

 66,082

 64,748

 65,708

 65,870

 64,944

 65,671

 65,857

 65,708

 65,031

 64,624

 64,784

 64,698

 64,821

 64,600

 64,981

 64,174

 65,129

 65,609

 65,708

 64,661

STORAGE

+622

-162

-1,174

+628

-173

-270

+455

-431

-1,402

+1,538

+891

-1,334

+960

+162

-926

+727

+186

-149

-677

-407

+160

-86

+123

-221

+381

-807

+955

+480

+99

-1,047

CHANGE

1,822

1,428

861

1,748

1,323

1,276

1,704

1,344

898

2,453

2,100

935

2,032

1,803

1,401

2,252

1,931

1,768

1,517

1,631

1,856

1,628

1,628

1,598

2,110

1,556

2,435

2,106

1,835

1,352

INFLOW

 1,497

 1,500

 1,447

 1,420

 1,400

 1,402

 1,461

 1,551

 1,593

 1,671

 1,639

 1,592

 1,534

 1,707

 1,856

 1,871

 1,823

 1,833

 1,844

 1,824

 1,763

 1,659

 1,554

 1,698

 1,844

 1,892

 1,892

 1,817

 1,770

 1,868

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 62

 64

 50

 29

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 11

 10

 6

 11

 10

 10

 14

 10

 12

 7

 12

 16

 14

 14

 12

 14

 14

 10

 14

 12

 12

 12

 12

 11

 12

 7

 12

 18

 15

 12

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 TULLOCH RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: 07/01/2010

RES.

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -899 50,331 50,222 205 0 356

ACRE-FEET -899 99,832 99,615 407 0 706

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 99,615

SPILL 407 100,022

 65,560

OUTLET 0

TOTAL 

NEW

MELONES

RELEASE (1)

 1,900

 1,431

 857

 1,723

 1,312

 1,266

 1,688

 1,355

 916

 2,430

 2,081

 953

 1,840

 1,979

 1,403

 2,234

 1,941

 1,771

 1,530

 1,639

 1,877

 1,610

 1,647

 1,589

 2,054

 1,578

 2,460

 2,088

 1,616

 1,568

 50,336

 99,841

*COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND

EVAPORATION.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 25, 2010

William Wiley, Director

Maricopa County Air Quality Department

1001 N Central Ave, Suite 400

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

Dear Mr. Wiley:

Thank you for your timely submission of the 2009 Air Monitoring Network Review. We 

have reviewed the submitted document and have found that it is complete, informative, very 

detailed and meets all of the requirements for annual network plans as required by our 

regulations set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (415) 

972-3851 or Michael Flagg at (415) 972-3372.

Sincerely,

/s/

Matthew Lakin, Manager

Air Quality Analysis Office

Air Division

cc: Ben Davis, MCAQD
§ 2.43 What review fees will you have to pay? ( a ) The bureau will charge review fees if you make a commercial-use request, subject to the restrictions of §§ 2.37(f), 2.39, and 2.40(a) of this subpart.
( b ) The bureau will assess review fees in connection with the initial review of the record (the review conducted by the bureau to determine whether an exemption applies to a particular record or portion of a record).
( c ) The Department will not charge for reviews at the administrative appeal stage of exemptions applied at the initial review stage. However, if the appellate authority determines that an exemption no longer applies, any costs associated with the bureau's re-review of the records to consider the use of other exemptions may be assessed as review fees.
( d ) The bureau will charge review fees at the same rates as those charged for a search under § 2.41(b) of this subpart.
( e ) The bureau can charge review fees even if the record(s) reviewed ultimately is not disclosed.
§ 2530.0-8 Land subject to allotment. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The law provides that allotments may include not to exceed 40 acres of irrigable land, 80 acres of nonirrigable agricultural land, or 160 acres of nonirrigable grazing land.
( 2 ) Irrigable lands are those susceptible of successful irrigation at a reasonable cost from any known source of water supply; nonirrigable agricultural lands are those upon which agricultural crops can be profitably raised without irrigation; grazing lands are those which can not be profitably devoted to any agricultural use other than grazing.
( 3 ) An allotment may be allowed for coal and oil and gas lands, with reservation of the mineral contents to the United States.
[35 FR 9589, June 13, 1970]
EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.






By: /s/ Walter Davis

Name:   Walter Davis
Title:  President of Demeter Management Corporation,
		   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 14, 2006
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Novis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Northern Explorations Ltd., for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Northern Explorations Ltd.

Date: July 1, 2007

                                       /s/ Richard Novis
                                       --------------------------------
                                       Richard Novis
                                       President, C.E.O. and Director
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)
### §1680a. Contract health facilities

The Service shall provide funds for health care programs and facilities operated by tribes and tribal organizations under contracts with the Service entered into under the Indian Self-Determination Act [25 U.S.C. 5321 et seq.]—

(1) for the maintenance and repair of clinics owned or leased by such tribes or tribal organizations,

(2) for employee training,

(3) for cost-of-living increases for employees, and

(4) for any other expenses relating to the provision of health services,

on the same basis as such funds are provided to programs and facilities operated directly by the Service.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §811, formerly title VII, §711, as added Pub. L. 100–713, title VII, §705, Nov. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 4828; renumbered title VIII, §811, Pub. L. 102–573, title VII, §701(a), (b), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4572.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Indian Self-Determination Act, referred to in text, is title I of Pub. L. 93–638, Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2206, which is classified principally to subchapter I (§5321 et seq.) of chapter 46 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of this title and Tables.
§ 418.1201 When will we determine your income-related monthly adjustment amount based on the modified adjusted gross income information that you provide for a more recent tax year? We will use a more recent tax year than the years described in § 418.1135(a) or (b) to reduce or eliminate your income-related monthly adjustment amount when all of the following occur: ( a ) You experience a major life-changing event as defined in § 418.1205; and
( b ) That major life-changing event results in a significant reduction in your modified adjusted gross income for the year which you request we use and the next year, if applicable. For purposes of this section, a significant reduction in your modified adjusted gross income is one that results in the decrease or elimination of your income-related monthly adjustment amount; and
( c ) You request that we use a more recent tax year's modified adjusted gross income; and
( d ) You provide evidence as described in §§ 418.1255 and 418.1265.
### §275. Leaves of absence to employees

On and after August 24, 1912 teachers in schools operated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs may be allowed, in addition to annual leave, educational leave not to exceed thirty workdays per calendar year, or sixty workdays in every alternate year, for attendance at educational gatherings, conventions, institutions, or training schools, if the interest of the Government requires, under such regulations as the Secretary of the Interior may prescribe; and no additional salary or expense on account of such leave of absence shall be incurred.

(Aug. 24, 1912, ch. 388, §1, 37 Stat. 519; Aug. 24, 1922, ch. 286, 42 Stat. 829; May 8, 1928, ch. 510, 45 Stat. 493; Pub. L. 85–89, July 10, 1957, 71 Stat. 282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1957—Pub. L. 85–89 substituted "Teachers in schools operated by the Bureau of Indian Affairs" for "Teachers of the Indian schools and physicians of the Indian Service".

1928—Act May 8, 1928, made section applicable to physicians of the Indian Service.

1922—Act Aug. 24, 1922, increased educational leave allowance from 15 to 30 days.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### **CHAPTER 26—INDIAN ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec.
2401.
Congressional findings.
2402.
Purpose.
2403.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—COORDINATION OF RESOURCES AND PROGRAMS

2411.
Inter-departmental Memorandum of Agreement.
2412.
Tribal Action Plans.
2413.
Departmental responsibility.
2414.
Congressional intent in construction of laws.
2414a.
Review of programs.
2415.
Federal facilities, property, and equipment; leasing of tribal property.
2416.
Newsletter.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—INDIAN YOUTH PROGRAMS

2431.
Review of programs.
2432.
Indian education programs.
2433.
Emergency shelters.
2434.
Social services reports.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—LAW ENFORCEMENT AND JUDICIAL SERVICES

2441.
Review of programs.
2442.
Illegal narcotics traffic on Tohono O'odham and St. Regis Reservations; source eradication.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS LAW ENFORCEMENT

2451.
Bureau of Indian Affairs law enforcement and judicial training.
2452.
Medical assessment and treatment of juvenile offenders.
2453.
Juvenile detention centers.
2454.
Model Indian Juvenile Code.
2455.
Law enforcement and judicial report.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—INDIAN ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION

2471 to 2478. Transferred or Repealed.
November 2022

STORAGE 1000 ACREFEET COMPUTED*

RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

7.67

1 790.51 7.69 0.02 22 10 0 1 0.06 0.00

2 790.59 7.72 0.03 28 10 0 1 0.09 0.05

3 790.65 7.75 0.03 25 11 0 1 0.06 0.02

4 790.68 7.76 0.01 18 11 0 1 0.10 0.00

5 790.78 7.80 0.04 32 10 0 1 0.08 0.00

6 790.89 7.85 0.05 33 10 0 0 0.01 0.00

7 791.01 7.90 0.05 37 10 0 1 0.09 0.10

8 791.22 7.99 0.09 54 10 0 0 0.00 0.55

9 791.49 8.10 0.12 68 10 0 0 0.01 0.29

10 791.73 8.20 0.10 62 10 0 0 0.00 0.00

11 792.00 8.32 0.12 69 10 0 0 0.02 0.00

12 792.17 8.40 0.08 49 10 0 1 0.07 0.00

13 792.34 8.47 0.08 48 10 0 0 0.00 0.00

14 792.48 8.53 0.06 41 10 0 0 0.02 0.00

15 792.64 8.61 0.07 46 10 0 0 0.03 0.00

16 792.96 8.75 0.15 84 10 0 1 0.05 0.00

17 792.88 8.71 -0.04 -8 10 0 1 0.08 0.00

18 793.03 8.78 0.07 45 10 0 1 0.04 0.00

19 793.13 8.83 0.05 35 10 0 2 0.16 0.00

20 793.26 8.89 0.06 40 10 0 0 0.01 0.00

21 793.38 8.94 0.06 38 10 0 0 0.03 0.00

22 793.50 9.00 0.06 38 10 0 0 0.03 0.00

23 793.64 9.06 0.07 43 10 0 0 0.03 0.00

24 793.74 9.11 0.05 35 10 0 1 0.08 0.00

25 793.88 9.18 0.07 44 10 0 1 0.06 0.00

26 794.02 9.24 0.07 44 10 0 1 0.08 0.00

27 794.13 9.29 0.05 37 10 0 1 0.06 0.00

28 794.26 9.36 0.06 42 10 0 1 0.05 0.00

29 794.36 9.40 0.05 35 10 0 1 0.06 0.00

30 794.45 9.45 0.04 33 10 0 1 0.04 0.00

TOTALS 1.78 1,217 302 0 19 1.50 1.01

ACRE-FEET 1,780 2,414 599 0 38

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 599

Spill 0

Total 599

Precipitation

This month = 1.01

July 01, 2022 To 

date =

3.57

October 01, 2022 

To date =

1.01

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Stony Gorge Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 12/1/2022
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350)

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Penford Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Thomas D.
Malkoski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Steven O. Cordier, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that
to his knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Thomas D. Malkoski
---------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Malkoski
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  January 14, 2004





/s/ Steven O. Cordier
---------------------------------------------
Steven O. Cordier
Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  January 14, 2004
EXHIBIT 11 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

In thousands of dollars, except per share data

                                                    Six months ended
                                                         June 30,
                                                1999                1998
Numerator:
  Net income (loss)                        $   93,764         $   33,488

  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Eller put/call option agreement            (2,334)            (2,229)
    Convertible debt                            5,687              2,453

Numerator for net income per
  common share - diluted                   $   97,117         $   33,712


Denominator:
  Weighted average common shares              287,012            222,708

  Effect of dilutive securities:
    Employee stock options                      5,129              4,316
    Eller put/call option agreement             1,693              2,042
    Convertible debt                            9,282              4,666

Denominator for net income
  per common share - diluted                  303,116            233,732

Net income (loss) per common share:
  Basic                                 $         .33      $         .15

  Diluted                               $         .32      $         .14