alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §803a. Project grants and contracts

#### (a) Authorization; purposes; application

The Secretary is authorized to make grants to or contracts with institutions of higher education, or combinations of such institutions, to assist them in planning, developing, strengthening, improving, or carrying out programs or projects (1) for the preparation of graduate or professional students in the fields of city and regional planning and management, housing, and urban affairs, or (2) for research into, or development or demonstration of, improved methods of education for these professions. Such grants or contracts may include payment of all or part of the cost of programs or projects.

#### (b) Contents; use of payments

(1) A grant or contract authorized by this section shall be made only upon application to the Secretary at such time or times and containing such information as he may prescribe, except that no such application shall be approved unless it—

(A) sets forth programs, activities, research, or development for which a grant is authorized under this section;

(B) provides for such fiscal control and fund accounting procedures as may be necessary to assure proper disbursement of and accounting for Federal funds paid to the applicant under this subsection; and

(C) provides for making such reports, in such form and containing such information, as the Secretary may require to carry out his functions under this subsection, and for keeping such records and for affording such access thereto as the Secretary may find necessary to assure the correctness and verification of such reports.

(2) Payments under this section may be used, in accordance with regulations of the Secretary, and subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an application approved under paragraph (1), to pay part of the compensation of students employed in professions referred to in subsection (a)(1), except students employed in any branch of the Government of the United States, as part of a program for which a grant has been approved pursuant to this subsection.

(Pub. L. 88–560, title VIII, §804, as added Pub. L. 93–383, title IV, §402(c)(2), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 692.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 93–383, §402, provided for amendments to title VIII of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1964. The amendments of the enumerated sections of such title VIII have been executed to comparable sections of title VIII of the Housing Act of 1964 as the probable intent of Congress.
October 2022

STORAGE COMPUTED* NEW

ACRE-FEET INFLOW MELONES RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAP**

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. RELEASE POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S.

60,629

1 504.56 60,398 -231 596 603 703 0 0 9

2 504.26 60,051 -347 462 484 627 0 0 10

3 504.59 60,433 382 773 789 573 0 0 7

4 504.54 60,375 -58 566 564 588 0 0 7

5 504.59 60,433 58 690 682 653 0 0 8

6 504.34 60,143 -290 511 527 646 0 0 11

7 504.54 60,375 232 756 759 627 0 0 12

8 504.53 60,363 -12 632 642 628 0 0 10

9 504.49 60,317 -46 615 620 627 0 0 11

10 504.11 59,877 -440 330 347 542 0 0 10

11 503.93 59,670 -207 550 555 643 0 0 11

12 503.22 58,861 -809 530 552 927 0 0 11

13 503.11 58,735 -126 1,196 1,187 1,253 0 0 7

14 502.38 57,916 -819 1,234 1,252 1,636 0 0 11

15 502.28 57,804 -112 1,560 1,570 1,609 0 0 7

16 502.20 57,714 -90 1,315 1,337 1,353 0 0 7

17 503.40 59,066 1,352 1,479 1,463 791 0 0 6

18 503.76 59,476 410 942 945 729 0 0 6

19 503.75 59,465 -11 1,005 1,002 1,004 0 0 7

20 503.28 58,929 -536 977 998 1,239 0 0 8

21 502.72 58,296 -633 1,229 1,237 1,539 0 0 9

22 502.46 58,005 -291 1,420 1,441 1,557 0 0 10

23 502.43 57,972 -33 1,212 1,218 1,225 0 0 4

24 502.53 58,084 112 738 759 674 0 0 8

25 502.89 58,487 403 808 811 598 0 0 7

26 503.51 59,191 704 927 926 565 0 0 7

27 502.12 57,624 -1,567 -7 23 777 0 0 6

28 501.40 56,828 -796 750 757 1,145 0 0 6

29 500.90 56,279 -549 706 741 977 0 0 6

30 500.68 56,040 -239 654 658 759 0 0 15

31 500.87 56,246 206 520 522 410 0 0 6

TOTALS -4,383 25,676 25,971 27,624 0 0 260

ACRE-FEET -4,383 50,928 51,513 54,792 0 0 516

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, AND EVAPORATION.

** EVAPORATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM NEW MELONES PAN.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 54,792 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total 54,792

Historical Archive and Report Database

Tulloch Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 12/13/2022
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4677 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4677

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
           provide death benefits for campus police officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 3, 2016

  Mr. Capuano (for himself, Mr. Keating, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Lynch, Mr. 
      McGovern, Mr. Neal, Mr. Moulton, Ms. Tsongas, Ms. Clark of 
  Massachusetts, Mr. Veasey, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mrs. Lawrence, and Ms. 
   Brownley of California) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
           provide death benefits for campus police officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Officer Sean Collier Campus Police 
Recognition Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. DEATH BENEFITS FOR CAMPUS POLICE OFFICERS.

    Section 1204 of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 
1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (9) as 
        paragraphs (2) through (10), respectively;
            (2) by inserting the following before paragraph (2) (as so 
        redesignated):
            ``(1) `campus police officer' means a police officer--
                    ``(A) who is authorized to enforce the criminal 
                laws (including the authorization to make arrests); and
                    ``(B) who is employed by an institution of higher 
                education (as such term is defined in section 101 of 
                the Higher Education Act of 1965), including a police 
                or similar department operated by such institution;''; 
                and
            (3) in paragraph (10) (as so redesignated)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (C)(ii), by striking ``or'' at 
                the end;
                    (B) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; or'' ; and
                    (C) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the 
                following:
                    ``(E) a campus police officer.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to a 
personal injury sustained in the line of duty by a campus police 
officer occurring on or after April 15, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
#### Emma F. Sully, Appellant, *v.*Tiffany & Company, Respondent.

*Pleading—MU of particulars — conversion.*

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the Sew York county clerk’s office on the 24th day of January, 1914, granting the defendant’s motion for a further bill of particulars.

Laughlin, J.:

TMs is an action for the conversion of certain personal property consisting of jewelry. The trial of the issues in the action has been unreasonably delayed by applications to the court for relief in a variety of forms, and by appeals on questions not involving the merits. The amended complaint contained two counts for the same relief. After the defendant interposed an answer, the plaintiff, by order of the court, served a reply to the first defense therein pleaded. The defendant then applied for an order reqmring the plaintiff to file and serve a verified bill of particulars of her claims in both counts in so far as defendant desired such particulars. That motion was granted and the plaintiff fully complied with the order. The defendant then moved for judgment on the pleadings. The motion was denied as to the first cause of action pleaded but granted as to the second. The defendant then moved for leave to serve an amended answer to the first cause of action in the amended complaint. The motion was granted and the amended answer was served and the plaintiff replied thereto. The defendant again made a motion for judgment on the pleadings. That motion was denied and the order was affirmed on appeal to this court (See ante, p. 856), and a motion by defendant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals was denied. Pending that appeal to this court, defendant moved for a further bill of particulars of the plaintiff’s first cause of action, which had undergone no change since the first motion for a bill of particulars of both counts was made and granted. In the main, the particulars *now*desired are of matters relating to immaterial allegations which it will not be necessary for plaintiff to prove; and in *883all other respects the demand for particulars relates to matters of evidence. There is no precedent for granting a bill of particulars in a simple action in conversion calling for particulars with respect to allegations which are plainly surplusage and, therefore, immaterial. It is high time that the dilatory tactics in this action should cease, and that the parties should present the merits of then litigation for decision. It follows that the order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT
#### In the Matter of the Application for the Probate of the Last Will and Testament of Louisa O. Dick, Deceased. Alfred W. Young, Appellant; Fannie M. Parsells, Respondent.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county affirmed, with costs of appeal payable out of the estate. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
### §§28 to 31. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632, 634

Section 28, R.S. §2056; act May 17, 1882, ch. 163, §1, 22 Stat. 87, fixed term of office for Indian Agents.

Section 29, R.S. §2057, provided for a bond by Indian Agents.

Section 30, R.S. §2060, prescribed limits of residence of Indian Agents.

Section 31, R.S. §2058, related to duties of Indian Agents.
### §1777. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–425, §2, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1890, which set out congressional findings and purposes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–425, §1, Nov. 1, 2000, 114 Stat. 1890, provided that Pub. L. 106–425, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Santo Domingo Pueblo Claims Settlement Act of 2000".
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 726.57

 727.74

 728.37

 728.81

 729.16

 729.48

 729.79

 730.10

 730.40

 730.66

 730.89

 731.12

 725.20

 721.22

 721.51

 720.81

 720.86

 721.69

 722.34

 722.90

 723.87

 728.05

 726.98

 725.73

 727.07

 727.99

 728.66

 729.18

 728.41

 725.64

 725.35

 1,435

 1,482

 1,508

 1,526

 1,541

 1,554

 1,567

 1,580

 1,593

 1,604

 1,613

 1,623

 1,381

 1,230

 1,241

 1,215

 1,217

 1,248

 1,272

 1,292

 1,329

 1,495

 1,451

 1,401

 1,455

 1,493

 1,520

 1,542

 1,510

 1,398

 1,387

STORAGE

+184

+47

+26

+18

+15

+13

+13

+13

+13

+11

+9

+10

-242

-151

+11

-26

+2

+31

+24

+20

+37

+166

-44

-50

+54

+38

+27

+22

-32

-112

-11

CHANGE

93

24

13

9

8

7

7

7

7

6

5

5

11

50

28

16

16

16

12

10

19

84

30

25

27

19

14

11

5

-5

5

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 133

 126

 22

 29

 15

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 52

 50

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 51

 11

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2018 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2018

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +136 584 0 510

ACRE-FEET +136 1,158 0 1,012

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,012

 1,012

 1,251

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10402]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No., 13010-002; Project No., 14272-000]


Mississippi 8 Hydro, LLC; FFP Project 98, LLC, ; Notice 
Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit Applications

    On April 23, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine 
priority between competing preliminary permit applications with 
identical filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that 
neither of the applicants' plans is better adapted than the other to 
develop, conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water 
resources of the region at issue, the priority established by this 
drawing will serve as the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order 
of priority is as follows:

1. Mississippi 8 Hydro, LLC--Project No. 13010-002.
2. FFP Project 98, LLC--Project No. 14272-000.

    Dated: April 24, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-10402 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### §1153. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–114, §3, Oct. 24, 1967, 81 Stat. 335, which related to distribution of shares of deceased enrollees and minors or persons under legal disabilities, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             Date: September 8, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510
                                               ---------

                                   ROYAL AHOLD
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
               ---------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                      ---                       -----

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes                       No    X
                                 ---                      ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.

<PAGE>


     On September 8, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold") issued a press
release providing additional information regarding the results of its U.S.
retail operations in the second quarter of 2004. A copy of this press release is
attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                     KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.


                                     -----------------------------------------
Date: September 9, 2004              By:      H.R. Ryopponen
                                     Title:   Executive Vice President and CFO



<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX



The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

99.1           Royal Ahold press release, dated September 8, 2004, providing
               additional information regarding the results of its U.S. retail
               operations in the second quarter of 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 182

 189

 186

 188

 192

 188

 180

 169

 170

 178

 180

 184

 185

 187

 199

 180

 188

 181

 201

 192

 185

 171

 189

 193

 131

 123

 136

 135

 123

 118

 106

 176

 178

 176

 178

 182

 174

 155

 154

 157

 161

 175

 173

 172

 171

 170

 161

 167

 163

 155

 165

 156

 147

 157

 123

 116

 107

 107

 102

 94

 95

 85

 178

 182

 181

 184

 187

 183

 172

 163

 164

 169

 178

 178

 179

 178

 179

 171

 174

 172

 175

 174

 167

 161

 170

 136

 122

 112

 117

 112

 107

 105

 94

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 20, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
                        SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kaydon Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian P. Campbell,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


November 8, 2002                        /s/ Brian P. Campbell
                                        ---------------------
                                        Brian P. Campbell
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
### §1775b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–377, §4, Oct. 19, 1994, 108 Stat. 3502, which related to action by the Secretary of the Interior regarding the compact between the State of Connecticut and the tribe providing for gaming operations and transfers of land to be held in trust and used as the tribe's reservation pursuant to the State Agreement, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Michael A. Fitzsimons, Appellant, *v.*Solomon G. Woodruff, Respondent.

(Argued June 6, 1878;

decided November 12, 1878.)

This action was brought to recover the purchase-price of a marble mantel alleged to have been manufactured for and sold and delivered to defendant. Defendant, among other things, alleged that his contract of purchase being oral was void under the statute of frauds. Plaintiff claimed that the contract was for work, labor and materials, and so not within the statute. The court held that the undisputed evidence showed a delivery and acceptance, and so, that the contract, if one of sale, thus became complete and binding.

*J. C. Cochrane*for appellant.

*A. J. Abbott*for respondent.

*622Miller, J.,

reads for reversal and new trial. All concur on the ground of acceptance.

Judgment reversed.
SISTEMA CATAGUAZES-LEOPOLDINA RECEIVES THE HIGHEST NUMBER
                      OF PRIZES IN THE 2004 ABRADEE AWARDS

Confirming the progress of the company's management, Sistema
Cataguazes-Leopoldina (SCL) recently received awards in four out of the five
categories in which it competed as a finalist in the 2004 Abradee Awards.

Companhia Forca e Luz Cataguazes-Leopoldina (CFLCL) received two awards: Social
Responsibility and Management Quality, both for distributors with up to 400
thousand consumers. Empresa Energetica de Sergipe, Energipe, won a prize for the
Best Distributor in the Northeast region. On the other hand Saelpa, Sociedade
Anonima de Eletrificacao da Paraiba, won the dispute for the best Management
Quality award for distributors with more than 400 thousand consumers.

In the opinion of SCL's Vice President for Regulation and Strategy, Danilo Dias,
the success achieved is a result of the company basing its strategy on
"centuries old values, such as: customer satisfaction, results orientated work,
competence, honesty and ethics, commitment to the community, speed of action,
innovation whilst respecting and valuing employees".

Winning four awards in 2004 reaffirms the excellent performance of SCL, which
had already received three awards in 2003 and two in 2002 through its
subsidiaries. In addition, winning two Quality Management prizes this year,
together with the prize for the Best Management Quality (for distributors with
up to 400 thousand consumers) received last year by Companhia Energetica da
Borborema (Celb), another SCL distributor, highlights the progress made by the
group's business management.

In the closing ceremony, Dilma Rousseff, Minister of Mines and Energy,
highlighted the merits of the Sistema Cataguazes-Leopoldina for having overcome
the difficult period that the sector passed through (post rationing) to return
good results.

Abradee, Associacao Brasileira de Distribuidores de Energia Eletrica (Brazilian
Association of Electric Energy Distributors) awards annual prizes to the
Brazilian electric energy distributors that were most outstanding in the
previous year in terms of business performance from the point of view of the
client, the community, the investor, the environment, the supplier and society
in general. The 2004 awards ceremony was held at the Hotel Kubitschek Plaza in
Brasilia, and was attended by the Minister of Mines and Energy, Dilma Rousseff,
the director of the National Electric Energy Agency (Aneel), Jose Mario Abdo,
and other authorities in the electrical sector.