alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 814.47

 816.56

 817.52

 819.96

 822.31

 823.52

 824.76

 825.49

 825.96

 826.39

 827.08

 827.54

 827.79

 827.93

 828.10

 828.40

 828.72

 828.92

 829.16

 829.35

 829.73

 829.80

 829.83

 829.83

 829.85

 829.85

 829.86

 829.90

 830.01

 831.68

 832.47

 22.35

 24.09

 24.92

 27.10

 29.30

 30.47

 31.70

 32.44

 32.92

 33.36

 34.08

 34.56

 34.82

 34.97

 35.15

 35.47

 35.81

 36.03

 36.29

 36.49

 36.91

 36.99

 37.02

 37.02

 37.04

 37.04

 37.05

 37.09

 37.22

 39.07

 39.97

STORAGE

+3.38

+1.74

+0.83

+2.18

+2.20

+1.17

+1.23

+0.74

+0.48

+0.44

+0.72

+0.48

+0.26

+0.15

+0.18

+0.32

+0.34

+0.22

+0.26

+0.21

+0.41

+0.08

+0.03

+0.00

+0.02

+0.00

+0.01

+0.04

+0.12

+1.86

+0.90

CHANGE

1,712

890

428

1,109

1,122

613

642

416

284

264

403

292

178

118

135

208

220

156

178

148

253

329

317

300

310

297

303

320

356

1,232

752

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 266

 275

 275

 275

 275

 275

 275

 275

 275

 275

OUTLET

 0

 1

 1

 0

 2

 2

 2

 4

 2

 1

 2

 8

 5

 3

 4

 7

 7

 7

 7

 4

 4

 4

 5

 5

 4

 2

 3

 3

 0

 0

 4

C.F.S.

 .00

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .11

 .06

 .02

 .07

 .25

 .15

 .10

 .11

 .20

 .20

 .21

 .19

 .12

 .12

 .12

 .15

 .14

 .12

 .06

 .08

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .10

INCHES

 1.53

 .04

 .04

 .95

 .08

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .21

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .49

 .10

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2014 RUN DATE: 05/02/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +21.00 14,285 3,111 480 103 3.02 3.60

ACRE-FEET +21,000 28,334 6,171 952 204

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 952

OUTLET

TOTAL

 6,171

 7,123

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.60

JULY 1, 2013 8.83

 18.97

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### In the Matter of Anna E. Morse et al., Appellants, against Fred W. Ereth, as Purchasing Agent for the City of Rochester, et al., Respondents.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order dismisses a petition on the grounds that the petitioners do not have legal capacity to sue and that the petition does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, in a proceeding to review the action of respondents in the letting of a snow removal contract.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Larkin, Love and Kimball, JJ. [See *post,*p. 944.]
Exhibit 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent  public  accountants,  we hereby consent to the  incorporation by
reference in this  registration  statement of our report dated  January 21, 2000
incorporated by reference in Newmont Mining Corporation's Form 10-K for the year
ended  December  31,  1999 and to all  references  to our Firm  included in this
registration statement.



/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSON LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSON LLP

Denver, Colorado
December 12, 2000
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, John Bennett, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report of Probe Manufacturing, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the Statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with  respect  to  the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our  supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which  this  report  is  being  prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of  the end of the period covered  by  this  report based on such evaluation; and;  c)    disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control  over  financial  reporting;  and;  5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):  d) all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and  e) any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's internal  control  over  financial  reporting.   DATED this 27th day of March 2008.  /s/ John Bennett ------------------------------- John Bennett Chief Financial Officer
§ 686.810 What is the makeup of a workforce council and what are its responsibilities? ( a ) Each Job Corps center must establish a workforce council, according to procedures established by the Secretary. The workforce council must include: ( 1 ) Non-governmental and private sector employers;
( 2 ) Representatives of labor organizations (where present) and of employees;
( 3 ) Job Corps enrollees and graduates; and
( 4 ) In the case of a single-State local area, the workforce council must include a representative of the State WDB constituted under § 679.110 of this chapter.
( b ) A majority of the council members must be business owners, chief executives or chief operating officers of nongovernmental employers or other private sector employers, or their designees, who have substantial management, hiring or policy responsibility and who represent businesses with employment opportunities in the local area and the areas in which students will seek employment.
( c ) The workforce council may include, or otherwise provide for consultation with, employers from outside the local area who are likely to hire a significant number of enrollees from the Job Corps center.
( d ) The workforce council must: ( 1 ) Work with all applicable Local WDBs and review labor market information to determine and provide recommendations to the Secretary regarding the center's career technical training offerings, including identification of emerging occupations suitable for training;
( 2 ) Review all relevant labor market information, including related information in the State Plan or the local plan, to: ( i ) Recommend in-demand industry sectors or occupations in the area in which the center operates;
( ii ) Determine employment opportunities in the areas in which enrollees intend to seek employment;
( iii ) Determine the skills and education necessary to obtain the identified employment; and
( iv ) Recommend to the Secretary the type of career technical training that must be implemented at the center to enable enrollees to obtain the employment opportunities identified; and
( 3 ) Meet at least once every 6 months to reevaluate the labor market information, and other relevant information, to determine and recommend to the Secretary any necessary changes in the career technical training provided at the center.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 2,317.76

 2,317.79

 2,317.83

 2,317.86

 2,317.89

 2,317.92

 2,317.88

 2,317.88

 2,317.89

 2,317.75

 2,317.65

 2,317.51

 2,317.31

 2,317.12

 2,317.19

 2,317.25

 2,317.31

 2,317.40

 2,317.60

 2,317.83

 2,318.14

 2,318.14

 2,319.08

 2,319.29

 2,319.45

 2,319.58

 2,319.67

 2,319.71

 1,682.2

 1,682.6

 1,683.1

 1,683.5

 1,683.9

 1,684.3

 1,683.8

 1,683.8

 1,683.9

 1,682.1

 1,680.8

 1,679.0

 1,676.4

 1,673.9

 1,674.8

 1,675.6

 1,676.4

 1,677.5

 1,680.1

 1,683.1

 1,687.1

 1,687.1

 1,699.4

 1,702.1

 1,704.2

 1,705.9

 1,707.1

 1,707.6

STORAGE

-0.4

+0.4

+0.5

+0.4

+0.4

+0.4

-0.5

+0.0

+0.1

-1.8

-1.3

-1.8

-2.6

-2.5

+0.9

+0.8

+0.8

+1.2

+2.6

+3.0

+4.0

+0.0

+12.2

+2.7

+2.1

+1.7

+1.2

+0.5

CHANGE

208

279

593

566

599

652

376

424

1,306

858

960

659

581

429

817

810

1,043

931

1,676

1,819

2,259

230

6,518

1,773

1,338

1,249

966

943

INFLOW

 389

 75

 328

 366

 395

 437

 637

 424

 1,198

 1,772

 1,583

 1,573

 1,886

 1,646

 330

 407

 643

 340

 370

 318

 231

 215

 335

 380

 271

 383

 338

 644

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 15

 8

 4

 4

 8

 19

 0

 0

 42

 0

 30

 0

 0

 23

 30

 11

 8

 4

 0

 0

 0

 15

 12

 8

 12

 8

 35

 35

C.F.S.

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .08

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .09

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .05

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .52

 .19

 .11

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .51

 .44

 .78

 .56

 .33

 .03

 .10

 .47

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2001 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 26, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +25.0 30,862 17,914 0 0 331 .86 4.48

ACRE-FEET +25,000 61,215 35,532 0 0 657

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 35,532

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 35,532

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.48

JULY 1, 2000 14.82

 1,682.6

Table 4

(1) (1)
### SUBCHAPTER II—AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACTIVITIES
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan RODRIGUEZ-DEL CAMPO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40210.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Rodriguez-Del Campo appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence imposed after remand for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Rodriguez-Del Campo’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Rodriguez-Del Campo contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *AlmendarezTorres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert.*
      *677
      *denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Rodriguez-Del Campo properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
p.1 

OAR Box 1672 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

^5£)ll-C-29 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/30/2008 11:01:00 AM Sheet 58 of 132 
P.2 

Author*; STEVE SHEDD <SHEDD.STEVE@epamail.epa.gov> at Internet 

Date: 5/15/98 4:11 PM 

Priority! Normal A 9 8 1 3 

BCC: JAHEREDO at WC-SANTA_BARBARA 11*0/ ~Z^ 

TO: JAHEREDO@wcc.com at INTERNET 

CC: bhaneke@rtp.pes.com at INTERNET 

CC: glaflam@rtp.pes.com at INTERNET 

Subject: Information Request for OLD -Reply 

Message Contents 

Joan, 

AAPL should restate what you have below in a letter to me or Bruce Jordan (to 

my attention). One clarification is 

the terminology you used below states emissions are based on design capacity. 

The cutoff in our instructions are 

based on 5/12.5 tons of actual HAP emissions. Please confirm and state in the 

letter that the plant site actual 

emissions are below the 5 or 12.5 tons of HAP criteria. 

If you have any questions on the above please contact me again. 

Steve Shedd 

Stephen Shedd 

U.S. EPA 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

voice: (919) 541-5397 

fax: (919) 541-0246 

E-mail: shedd.steve@epa.gov 

> » <JAHEREDO@wcc.com> 05/15/98 01:47pm > » 

Dear Steve, 

On behalf of All American Pipeline (AAPL), I would like to obtain 

clarification on the submittal of information requested for OLD 

sources. AAPL owns and operates a crude oil pipeline that runs from 

California to Texas. They operate six pump stations which are major 

sources of criteria pollutants, however all have HAP emissions below 

2.5 tons per year based on design capacity. These emission estimates 

are documented through submittal of Title V applications to the 

approriate local air agency. The primary source of emissions at these 

facilities are turbines which are used to operate pumps to facilitate 

crude movement through the pipeline. Only one facility has crude oil 

storage capacity. AAP1 also has several smaller pump stations which 

are not major sources of criteria or HAP emissions. 

Based on the estimated emissions and the guidance provided in your 

April 29, 1998 request for information,, it is understood that AAPL 

will not have to submit detailed information on facility operations. 

Specifically, Enclosure 1 page 2 states that facilities which do not 

meet the large source criteria only need to submit this finding in 

writing to the EPA. 

Please specify what information needs to be included in the letter to 

the EPA.
§ 686.505 What types of training must Job Corps centers provide? ( a ) Job Corps centers must provide students with a career technical training program that is: ( 1 ) Aligned with industry-recognized standards and credentials and with program guidance; and
( 2 ) Linked to employment opportunities in in-demand industry sectors and occupations both in the area in which the center is located and, if practicable, in the area the student plans to reside after graduation.
( b ) Each center must provide education programs, including: An English language acquisition program, high school diploma or high school equivalency certification program, and academic skills training necessary for students to master skills in their chosen career technical training programs.
( c ) Each center must provide programs for students to learn and practice employability and independent learning and living skills including: job search and career development, interpersonal relations, driver's education, study and critical thinking skills, financial literacy and other skills specified in program guidance.
( d ) All Job Corps training programs must be based on industry and academic skills standards leading to recognized industry and academic credentials, applying evidence-based instructional approaches, and resulting in: ( 1 ) Students' employment in unsubsidized, in-demand jobs with the potential for advancement opportunities;
( 2 ) Enrollment in advanced education and training programs or apprenticeships, including registered apprenticeship; or
( 3 ) Enlistment in the Armed Services.
( e ) Specific career technical training programs offered by individual centers must be approved by the Regional Director according to policies issued by the Secretary.
( f ) Center workforce councils described in § 686.810 must review appropriate labor market information, identify in-demand industry sectors and employment opportunities in local areas where students will look for employment, determine the skills and education necessary for those jobs, and as appropriate, recommend changes in the center's career technical training program to the Secretary.
( g ) Each center must implement a system to evaluate and track the progress and achievements of each student at regular intervals.
( h ) Each center must develop a training plan that must be available for review and approval by the appropriate Regional Director.
§ 10005.9 Relationship of the plan to congressional appropriations and Commission expenditures. ( a ) The plan itself does not constitute a commitment of resources for any given project. The commitment to expend resources is dependent upon Congressional appropriation, and, following this, Commission approval of specific projects.
( b ) The Commission will rely on the plan as the primary source of information for the development of the agency's annual budget. For each fiscal year, projects identified in the plan will be arranged into a series of programs based on project type or ecological and geographical associations. These programs will serve as the basis for the agency's budget request.
( c ) Once the budget request is formulated and submitted to the Congress, the request may be altered or reformulated by the Congress before the appropriation statute is finally approved. The appropriation statute will then control the implementation of the plan. In light of the controlling nature of the appropriation statute over the implementation of the plan, the plan must maintain sufficient flexibility to allow adjustments to comply with appropriations. The amendment process described in § 10005.21 provides the mechanism for modifying the plan to correspond to changes in Congressional appropriations. Changes to the annual project portfolio will, in most instances, constitute a “substantive” amendment as described in § 10005.21.
( d ) Once appropriations have been approved by the Congress, the plan will serve as the principal guidance to the Commission in entering into agreements and approving the expenditure of funds for specific projects.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

March-05

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Mar-05 12 12 12 12 1,030 303 0 0 8 8 8 8 680 200 3,849 4,367 2-Mar-05 12 12 12 12 1,042 315 0 0 8 8 8 8 688 208 3,929 4,125 3-Mar-05 0 12 0 12 1,042 327 0 0 0 8 0 8 688 216 3,975 4,389 4-Mar-05 0 12 0 12 1,042 339 0 0 0 8 0 8 688 224 4,729 4,374 5-Mar-05 12 24 12 24 1,054 363 0 0 8 16 8 16 696 240 4,722 4,343 6-Mar-05 12 0 12 0 1,066 363 0 0 8 0 8 0 704 240 4,723 4,377 7-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,066 363 0 0 0 0 0 0 704 240 4,851 4,407 8-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,066 363 0 0 0 0 0 0 704 240 4,801 4,381 9-Mar-05 0 12 0 12 1,066 375 0 0 0 8 0 8 704 248 3,023 4,378 

10-Mar-05 12 12 12 12 1,078 387 0 0 8 8 8 8 711 255 1,049 4,382 11-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,078 387 0 0 0 0 0 0 711 255 925 4,382 

12-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,078 387 0 0 0 0 0 0 711 255 926 4,383 

13-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,078 387 0 0 0 0 0 0 711 255 2,526 4,362 

14-Mar-05 12 0 12 0 1,090 387 0 0 8 0 8 0 719 255 1,100 4,370 15-Mar-05 12 0 12 0 1,102 387 0 0 8 0 8 0 727 255 1,079 4,371 

16-Mar-05 12 24 12 24 1,114 411 0 0 8 16 8 16 735 271 1,905 2,668 

17-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,114 411 0 0 0 0 0 0 735 271 4,978 2,002 

18-Mar-05 12 0 12 0 1,126 411 0 0 8 0 8 0 743 271 5,484 2,003 

19-Mar-05 24 0 24 0 1,150 411 0 0 16 0 16 0 759 271 5,421 2,009 20-Mar-05 12 0 12 0 1,162 411 0 0 8 0 8 0 767 271 5,359 3,143 

21-Mar-05 24 0 24 0 1,186 411 0 0 16 0 16 0 783 271 5,085 3,652 22-Mar-05 24 12 24 12 1,210 423 0 0 16 8 16 8 799 279 4,622 3,657 23-Mar-05 48 0 48 0 1,258 423 0 0 32 0 32 0 830 279 4,461 3,118 24-Mar-05 0 12 0 12 1,258 435 0 0 0 8 0 8 830 287 4,385 2,906 

25-Mar-05 0 12 0 12 1,258 447 0 0 0 8 0 8 830 295 3,571 2,274 

26-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,258 447 0 0 0 0 0 0 830 295 3,477 2,011 

27-Mar-05 0 12 0 12 1,258 459 0 0 0 8 0 8 830 303 3,475 2,010 

28-Mar-05 24 12 24 12 1,282 471 0 0 16 8 16 8 846 311 3,452 1,955 29-Mar-05 12 0 12 0 1,294 471 0 0 8 0 8 0 854 311 3,475 1,882 

30-Mar-05 0 12 0 12 1,294 483 0 0 0 8 0 8 854 319 3,474 1,966 

31-Mar-05 0 0 0 0 1,294 483 0 0 0 0 0 0 854 319 3,405 2,006 

Total 0 0 276 192 276 192 1,294 483 0 0 182 127 182 127 854 319 112,235 104,650 

Banks Tracy Co
Exhibit 32.1
           Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries
             Certification Of Chief Executive Officer
    Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
          Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Rodney Tiede, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)   The Form 10-QSB/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Date: November 21, 2005

/s/ Rodney M.Tiede
-------------------------
Rodney M.Tiede
Chief Executive Officer