alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 726.114 Period of authorization as self-insurer; reauthorization. ( a ) No initial authorization to self-insure shall be granted for a period in excess of 18 months. A self-insurer who has made an adequate deposit of negotiable securities in compliance with §§ 726.106(c) and 726.107 will be reauthorized for the ensuing fiscal year without additional security if the Office finds that his experience as a self-insurer warrants such action. If the Office determines that such self-insurer's experience indicates a need for the deposit of additional security, no reauthorization shall be issued for the ensuing fiscal year until the Office receives satisfactory proof that the requisite amount of additional securities has been deposited. A self-insurer who currently has on file an indemnity bond will receive from the Office each year a bond form for execution in contemplation of reauthorization, and the submission of such bond duly executed in the amount indicated by the Office will be deemed and treated as such self-insurer's application for reauthorization for the ensuing fiscal year.
( b ) In each case for which there is an approved change in the amount of security provided, a new agreement and undertaking shall be executed.
( c ) Each operator authorized to self-insure under this part shall apply for reauthorization for any period during which it engages in the operation of a coal mine and for additional periods after it ceases operating a coal mine. Upon application by the operator, accompanied by proof that the security it has posted is sufficient to secure all benefits potentially payable to miners formerly employed by the operator, the Office shall issue a certification that the operator is exempt from the requirements of this part based on its prior operation of a coal mine. The provisions of subpart D of this part shall be applicable to any operator that fails to apply for reauthorization in accordance with the provisions of this section.
### §6084. Limitation of actions

An action under section 6082 of this title may not be brought more than 2 years after the trafficking giving rise to the action has ceased to occur.

(Pub. L. 104–114, title III, §305, Mar. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 821.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 448.39

 448.60

 448.81

 449.06

 448.82

 449.04

 449.39

 449.94

 450.39

 450.86

 451.25

 452.17

 452.41

 452.63

 452.97

 453.16

 453.32

 453.56

 453.46

 453.68

 453.77

 454.02

 454.12

 454.37

 454.59

 455.29

 456.07

 456.60

 457.38

 458.17

 458.71

 956,349

 958,421

 960,494

 962,964

 960,593

 962,766

 966,227

 971,674

 976,139

 980,809

 984,690

 993,865

 996,263

 998,463

 1,001,866

 1,003,769

 1,005,373

 1,007,780

 1,006,777

 1,008,985

 1,009,888

 1,012,400

 1,013,405

 1,015,919

 1,018,133

 1,025,189

 1,033,071

 1,038,437

 1,046,352

 1,054,388

 1,059,893

STORAGE

+986

+2,072

+2,073

+2,470

-2,371

+2,173

+3,461

+5,447

+4,465

+4,670

+3,881

+9,175

+2,398

+2,200

+3,403

+1,903

+1,604

+2,407

-1,003

+2,208

+903

+2,512

+1,005

+2,514

+2,214

+7,056

+7,882

+5,366

+7,915

+8,036

+5,505

CHANGE

877

1,225

1,400

1,400

1,063

1,382

2,283

2,888

2,608

2,816

2,047

2,747

1,573

1,377

2,070

1,180

1,180

1,190

2,263

1,567

786

1,496

786

1,573

1,432

1,967

2,942

2,719

4,295

4,478

3,139

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 206

 192

 172

 180

 178

 179

 175

 185

 184

 185

 193

 189

 184

 191

 173

 199

 199

 205

 206

 168

 155

 144

 149

 142

 145

 165

 143

 113

 109

 97

 307

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-173

+12

-183

+26

-2,080

-108

-363

+43

-172

-277

+102

+2,068

-180

-77

-181

-22

-172

+229

-2,562

-286

-176

-86

-131

-164

-171

+1,755

+1,175

+99

-196

-330

-57

OR

 6

 48

 0

 19

 32

 19

 16

 3

 6

 26

 23

 23

 13

 16

 26

 49

 23

 49

 81

 59

 72

 59

 42

 36

 16

 49

 69

 92

 7

 26

 30

C.F.S.

 .02

 .15

 .00

 .06

 .10

 .06

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .08

 .07

 .07

 .04

 .05

 .08

 .15

 .07

 .15

 .25

 .18

 .22

 .18

 .13

 .11

 .05

 .15

 .21

 .28

 .02

 .08

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .11

 .00

 .08

 .01

 .91

 2.38

 .24

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR March 11, 2021

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2021 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +104,530 60,749 0 5,412 0 -2,638 1,035 3.18 3.77

ACRE-FEET +104,530 120,496 0 10,735 0 -5,232 2,053

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 10,735 TOTAL 10,735

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2020 TO DATE = 4.59

 955,363

SPILL 0 3.77

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 4.59
#### Morris Landa, Respondent, v. Lazarus Tarushkin et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ.
Exhibit
      31.2




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Mary
      Desmond, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2007,
      of
      Techprecision Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated:
              June 28, 2007
            
            /s/
              Mary
              DesmondMary
              DesmondChief
              Financial Officer
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 

August 22, 2013 

The Honorable Cedric B. Glover 

~ayorofShreveport 

P.O. Box 31109 

Shreveport, LA 71130 

Dear ~ayor Glover: 

-- :2 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted by the Shreveport Airport 

Autho_rity for a grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air 

Service Development Program. 

The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, althot1gh no more than four awards may be to communities in the same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. 

On June 24, the Department issued an order setting a deadline of July 26 for applications. As 

these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any 

particular proposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all 

proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sincerely, 

Anthony R. Foxx 
C£0RIC ~- Gt.OV£R 

~·\'OR 

July24, 2013 

OFFICE OF THE MA'(OR SHREVEPORT. LOUISIANA. 

The Honorable Anthony Foxx 

Secre\(\ry; U.S.Depanment ofTransponation 

1200 New Jersey Ave,, SE 

Washington, District of Columbia 20590 

Deat Secretary Pol\'X, 

I'OST Oftl<:S I!OX 31 f .09 $l!!lt;VO'Qll'f, IJ\ 7 u ~0 

13\ &) lfi~®!SO Ita\!>) 67:}-'il099 If loll) 

Thank you for your consideration of the Shreveport Ail:port Authority's request to expand 

airline service through a new route 10 the Midwest or Atlantic region. 

The creation of this r()utc is essential for the region served by Shreveport Regional 

Ail)1ort. The growing economy of Northwest Louisiana, Ees~ Texas and Southwest 

Arkansas depends upon Shreveport Regional Ail}1orl to provide airline connections to the 

United States and to the world. 

We fully support the Shreveport Airport Authority's eiforts to crea~ additional airline 

~rvice on a new route. The approval of Shreveport's Small CQmmunity Ait Service 

Development grant request wilt help U1e region meel its emerging needs for inereas(ld 

airline service. 

Thank. you again for your cousideratioo. 

~1! f:z_ 

MAYOR ~-

22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 831.05

 828.71

 829.60

 830.07

 830.30

 830.70

 831.15

 831.62

 831.93

 832.00

 832.00

 832.04

 831.98

 831.92

 831.85

 831.58

 831.23

 831.14

 831.67

 831.78

 831.77

 831.65

 831.46

 831.18

 830.84

 830.52

 830.08

 829.62

 829.30

 829.08

 829.21

 38.37

 35.80

 36.77

 37.28

 37.54

 37.98

 38.48

 39.01

 39.36

 39.44

 39.44

 39.48

 39.41

 39.35

 39.27

 38.96

 38.57

 38.47

 39.07

 39.19

 39.18

 39.04

 38.83

 38.51

 38.13

 37.78

 37.29

 36.79

 36.44

 36.20

 36.34

STORAGE

-4.61

-2.56

+0.96

+0.51

+0.26

+0.44

+0.50

+0.53

+0.35

+0.08

+0.00

+0.05

-0.07

-0.07

-0.08

-0.30

-0.39

-0.10

+0.60

+0.12

-0.01

-0.14

-0.21

-0.32

-0.38

-0.35

-0.49

-0.50

-0.35

-0.24

+0.14

CHANGE

14,511

6,442

3,855

2,473

2,057

1,581

1,248

1,070

837

707

667

692

632

632

625

512

463

610

965

728

658

597

559

505

469

470

415

407

484

538

731

INFLOW

 16,200

 7,101

 2,732

 1,576

 1,289

 718

 355

 159

 17

 20

 20

 23

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 637

 633

 636

 637

 638

 640

 640

 643

 644

 646

 646

 646

 645

 645

 644

 644

 641

 641

 644

 644

 644

 644

 644

 642

 640

 627

 640

 640

 639

 638

 638

OUTLET

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .06

 .06

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .03

INCHES

 .17

 .73

 .00

 .38

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .31

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .02

 .00

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .17

 .00

 .10

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JANUARY 2006 RUN DATE: 05/17/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -6.63 47,140 19,870 30,590 25 .70 2.61

ACRE-FEET -6,630 93,502 39,412 60,675 50

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 60,675

OUTLET

TOTAL

 39,412

 100,087

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.61

JULY 1, 2005 14.95

 42.98

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### John Sloan et al., Copartners under the Name of Sloan & Robertson, Appellants-Respondents, v. State of New York, Respondent-Appellant.

(Claim No. 25816.)

Crapser, Heffernan and Sehenek, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Bliss, J., dissent, upon the same grounds mentioned in *Dusenbury v. State of New York [ante,*p. 889], decided herewith.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 28, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58010-58011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21623]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Financial Management Service; Senior Executive Service; Combined 
Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Treasury Department.

ACTION: Notice of members of Combined Performance Review Board (PRB).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), this notice announces the 
appointment of members of the Combined PRB for the Financial

[[Page 58011]]

Management Service, the Bureau of the Public Debt, the U.S. Mint, the 
Bureau of Engraving and Printing and the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and 
Trade Bureau. The Board reviews the performance appraisals of career 
senior executives below the level of bureau head and principal deputy 
in the five bureaus, except for executives below the Assistant 
Commissioner level in the Financial Management Service. The Board makes 
recommendations regarding proposed performance appraisals, ratings, 
bonuses and other appropriate personnel actions.
    Composition of Combined PRB: The Board shall consist of at least 
three voting members. In case of an appraisal of a career appointee, 
more than half of the members shall consist of career appointees. The 
names and titles of the Combined PRB members are as follows:

Primary Members

    Scott H. Johnson, Assistant Commissioner (Management), CFO, FMS.
    Jerry Horton, Associate Director, CIO, U.S. Mint.
    Joel C. Taub, Associate Director (Management), BEP.
    Cynthia Z. Springer, Assistant Commissioner (Office of Information 
Technology), BPD.

Alternate Members

    Judy Tillman, Assistant Commissioner (Regional Operations), FMS.
    Marcia Coates, Senior Advisor, Mint.
    Gregory D. Carper, Associate Director, CFO, BEP.
    John W. Swales, Assistant Commissioner (Office of Securities 
Operations), BPD.

DATES: This notice of the appointment of individuals to serve on the 
Combined PRB is effective September 28, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott H. Johnson, Assistant 
Commissioner (Management), CFO, Financial Management Service, 401 14th 
Street, SW., Room 259, Washington, DC 20227. Telephone number: 202 874-
7100.
    This notice does not meet the Department's criteria for significant 
regulations.

    Dated: September 21, 2004.
Gavin E. Jackson,
Acting Director of the Human Resources Division, Financial Management 
Service.
[FR Doc. 04-21623 Filed 9-27-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
§ 725.461 Waiver of right to appear and present evidence. ( a ) If all parties waive their right to appear before the administrative law judge, it shall not be necessary for the administrative law judge to give notice of, or conduct, an oral hearing. A waiver of the right to appear shall be made in writing and filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge or the administrative law judge assigned to hear the case. Such waiver may be withdrawn by a party for good cause shown at any time prior to the mailing of the decision in the claim. Even though all of the parties have filed a waiver of the right to appear, the administrative law judge may, nevertheless, after giving notice of the time and place, conduct a hearing if he or she believes that the personal appearance and testimony of the party or parties would assist in ascertaining the facts in issue in the claim. Where a waiver has been filed by all parties, and they do not appear before the administrative law judge personally or by representative, the administrative law judge shall make a record of the relevant documentary evidence submitted in accordance with this part and any further written stipulations of the parties. Such documents and stipulations shall be considered the evidence of record in the case and the decision shall be based upon such evidence.
( b ) Except as provided in § 725.456(a), the unexcused failure of any party to attend a hearing shall constitute a waiver of such party's right to present evidence at the hearing, and may result in a dismissal of the claim (see § 725.465).
### §180. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(i), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3380

Section, acts May 9, 1941, ch. 101, 55 Stat. 186; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §5, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Oct. 17, 1979, Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), 93 Stat. 695, related to American Red Cross buildings on Saint Elizabeths Hospital reservation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
#### Irving Horowitz, Doing Business as Honest Value Merchandise Co., Appellant, v. Louis Levy, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §1054. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–506, §4, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 639, which provided for payment of costs incurred in preparation of rolls and distribution of payment of pro rata shares, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit 99.1

[Graphic omitted]

2:29AM 2005.02.28 (GMT)
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. Announces Intention to Redeem Senior Notes

London, England - February 28, 2005 - Stolt-Nielsen S.A. (NasdaqNM: SNSA; Oslo
Stock Exchange: SNI) today announced that it has determined to exercise its
right pursuant to the note agreements governing the Company's senior notes to
redeem all $295.4 million aggregate outstanding principal amount of senior
notes. The Company's senior notes will be redeemed at the respective redemption
prices set forth in each of the note agreements. The Company expects to complete
the redemption within its second fiscal quarter. Following completion of this
redemption, the Company will seek to refinance other debt which it anticipates
will further lower its financing costs.

About Stolt-Nielsen S.A.
Stolt-Nielsen S.A. (NASDAQNM: SNSA; Oslo Stock Exchange: SNI) is one of the
world's leading providers of transportation services for bulk liquid chemicals,
edible oils, acids, and other specialty liquids. Stolt-Nielsen S.A., through its
parcel tanker, tank container, terminal, rail and barge services, provides
integrated transportation for its customers. Stolt Sea Farm, wholly-owned by
Stolt-Nielsen S.A., produces and markets high quality Atlantic salmon, salmon
trout, turbot, halibut, sturgeon, caviar, bluefin tuna, and tilapia.
(www.stolt-nielsen.com).

Contact:
Richard M. Lemanski
U.S. 1 203 625 3604
rlemanski@stolt.com

Valerie Lyon
UK 44 20 7611 8904
vlyon@stolt.com
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

JASON ROBERT PAUL AND JOAN PAUL 

 v. 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES 

OF THE COMMONWEALTH; SOMERSET 

COUNTY CHILD PROTECTIVE 

SERVICES; EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA; OFFICE OF 

ATTORNEY GENERAL; AND 

SOMERSET BOROUGH POLICE 

DEPARTMENT 

PETITION OF: JASON ROBERT PAUL 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 255 WAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 1st day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
August 6, 2015

Mr. Melvin Dickinson

803 West 27th Avenue

Kennewick, WA 99337

Dear Mr. Dickinson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−0727 on 

March 24, 2015, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
### §1300n–5. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–568, title XIV, §1407, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2941, which provided for governance of the tribe by an Interim Tribal Council until ratification of a final tribal constitution, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.