alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.N E S ® 

iVIarch 23, 2015 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Otlice of Aviation Analysis 

US Department ofTransportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

SkyWest Airlines' Essential Air Service Hold-In Rate for Pueblo, CO 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

Attached is SkyWest Airlines' proposal for a hold-in rate for direct air service from 

Pueblo, CO to Denver, CO. 

On November 18, 2014 SkyWest gave a 90 day notice that it would discontinue service 

from Pueblo, CO to Denver. CO under the EAS program. As SkyWest is currently heldin beyond the 90 day notice period and is awaiting a replacement carrier, we have 

requested a new hold-in rate tor service. This rate increase is due to tleet changes at 

SkyWest. SkyWest is retiring the 30 passenger EMB-120 Brasilia and is replacing them 

with 50 passenger CRJ-200's. Pueblo, CO service moved to CRJ-200 service on 

February I, 2015, where service continues at 12 scheduled weekly round-trips. Sky West 

requests the new hold-in rate to be effective beginning March I, 2015. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Greg Atkin 

iVIanaging Director, Market Development 

SkyWest Airlines 
SkyWest Airlines 

Essential Air Service Hold-In Rate 

3/23/2015 

PUB 

DEN 

Number of round-trips per week 12 

Aircraft type CRJ200 

Passenger Revenue 

Passengers 11,400 

Average fare $ 55.00 

Revenue $ 627,000 

Block Time 

Trip block time (minutes) 48 

Total scheduled block time 998 

Total completed block time 98% 978 

RPMS 

Passengers 11,400 

Stage length 109 

1,242,600 

ASMs 

Scheduled departures 1,248 

Competed departures 98% 1,223 

Stage length 109 

Available Seats so 

6,801,600 

Revenue $ 627,000 

Direct operating expenses $ 2,641, 766 

RPM related $ 4,237 

Departure related $ 868,517 

ASM related $ 63,391 

Total expenses $ 3,577,912 

Operating income (loss) $ (2,950,912) 

5% profit margin $ 178,896 

Annual subsidy requirement s 3,129,808 

SkyWest effective rates per unit 

Cost per trip s 2,925 

Cost per passenger $ 314 

SkyWest cost per block hour $ 3,657 

Effective Subsidy rate per unit 

Subsidy per trip $ 2,559 

Subsidy per passenger $ 275 

Load factor 18%
### SUBCHAPTER IX—MOHEGAN NATION (CONNECTICUT) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT
#### Isaac J. Cohn, Appellant, *v.*Tanner Motor Car Company, Respondent.

*Sale—false representations—inconsistent verdict.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 23d day of October, 1913, upon a verdict, and from an order entered on the 1st day of Hovember, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

*884Scott, J.:

This action is for damages for false representations in the sale of a motor car. The defendant counterclaims for damages for plaintiff’s failure to do certain advertising for defendant. Plaintiff, who had already owned cars sold by defendant, purchased on April 4, 1912, a six-cylinder five-passenger car for the price of $1,850, paying $600 in cash, $650 by turning in his old car, and as to the remaining $600 agreed to place advertisements at certain stations of the Long Island Railroad Company. By agreement one-half of this advertising was to be done for another company. The plaintiff alleges that defendant represented and warranted that the car sold was a new one and was in first-class condition. The principal question litigated was whether or not this representation had been made, defendant claiming that plaintiff had purchased the car well knowing that it had been used to a considerable extent. Upon this issue the jury found in plaintiff’s favor, but for some reason, not apparent, awarded only nominal damages, although it was clearly shown that the car was not a new one and was far from being in first-class condition. To find that the representations were made as claimed by plaintiff, and yet to award only nominal damages, was so inconsistent as to compel the conclusion that the verdict was against the evidence. The court directed a verdict in favor of defendant upon the counterclaim. This was error. The plaintiff had never refused to display defendant’s advertisements. He could not do so until the matter to be displayed had been furnished him and this was never done. The judgment and order appealed from must be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
### §1300n. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–568, title XIV, §1402, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2939, which set out congressional findings, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 106–568, title XIV, §1401, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2939, provided that title XIV of Pub. L. 106–568, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Graton Rancheria Restoration Act".
#### § 686.525 Are students permitted to hold jobs other than work-based learning opportunities?

Yes, a center operator may authorize a student to participate in gainful leisure time employment, as long as the employment does not interfere with required scheduled activities.
(No. 74-CC-568

#### Ray O’herron Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

Ray O’herron Co., Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §7426. Repealed. Pub. L. 110–181, div. A, title XII, §1212(a), Jan. 28, 2008, 122 Stat. 371

Section, Pub. L. 107–206, title II, §2007, Aug. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 905, prohibited United States military assistance to parties to the International Criminal Court.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 30, 2011, Cambrex Charles City, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleHydrocodone (9193)
IIMethadone (9250)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for sale to its customers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than June 25, 2012. Dated: April 17, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-10057 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
July 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET SAN LUIS RELEASE - C.F.S. GAIN(+) OR EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY

ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING 

C.F.S

POWER PACHECO

TUNNEL

SPILL LOSS(-) C.F.S. C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

1,961,256

1 536.92 1,951,092 -10,164 0 4,998 209 0 83 223 0.55 0.00

2 536.98 1,951,844 752 1,178 0 187 0 -611 325 0.80 0.00

3 537.02 1,952,346 502 1,324 1,048 209 0 186 305 0.75 0.00

4 536.93 1,951,217 -1,129 1,030 1,221 207 0 -171 345 0.85 0.00

5 536.98 1,951,844 627 2,212 1,225 198 0 -473 244 0.60 0.00

6 536.68 1,948,084 -3,760 0 1,656 215 0 -25 244 0.60 0.00

7 536.47 1,945,453 -2,631 0 1,038 189 0 -100 162 0.40 0.00

8 536.27 1,942,948 -2,505 0 604 174 0 -484 162 0.40 0.00

9 536.47 1,945,453 2,505 1,777 0 151 0 -363 243 0.60 0.00

10 536.56 1,946,580 1,127 1,187 610 183 0 173 215 0.53 0.00

11 536.44 1,945,077 -1,503 0 436 172 0 -150 223 0.55 0.00

12 536.28 1,943,074 -2,003 0 690 190 0 -130 243 0.60 0.00

13 536.04 1,940,070 -3,004 596 1,805 191 0 -114 304 0.75 0.00

14 535.89 1,938,193 -1,877 601 1,214 192 0 -143 243 0.60 0.00

15 535.75 1,936,442 -1,751 594 1,214 44 0 -219 243 0.60 0.00

16 535.75 1,936,442 0 1,114 609 180 0 -324 203 0.50 0.00

17 535.58 1,934,317 -2,125 1,112 1,805 189 0 -189 344 0.85 0.00

18 535.24 1,930,069 -4,248 595 2,410 205 0 -121 303 0.75 0.00

19 534.84 1,925,075 -4,994 596 2,944 57 0 -112 351 0.87 0.00

20 534.35 1,918,963 -6,112 0 2,838 204 0 -39 242 0.60 0.00

21 533.84 1,912,610 -6,353 0 3,099 203 0 99 286 0.71 0.00

22 533.37 1,906,761 -5,849 0 2,738 207 0 -4 181 0.45 0.00

23 533.16 1,904,150 -2,611 0 1,028 197 0 -91 289 0.72 0.00

24 532.95 1,901,539 -2,611 106 1,030 212 0 -180 302 0.75 0.00

25 532.58 1,896,944 -4,595 0 2,037 236 0 -43 269 0.67 0.00

26 532.05 1,890,368 -6,576 0 2,998 244 0 -74 241 0.60 0.00

27 531.55 1,884,171 -6,197 0 2,756 243 0 -125 293 0.73 0.00

28 530.75 1,874,271 -9,900 0 4,783 256 0 48 276 0.69 0.00

29 530.16 1,866,981 -7,290 0 3,426 244 0 -6 251 0.63 0.00

30 530.06 1,865,747 -1,234 1,468 1,886 216 0 12 267 0.67 0.00

31 529.69 1,861,181 -4,566 0 1,881 541 0 120 299 0.75 0.00

TOTALS -100,075 15,490 56,027 6,345 0 -3,570 8,121 20.12 0.00

ACRE-FEET -100,075 30,726 111,127 12,585 0 -7,089 16,108

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 111,127 Spill 0

Pacheco Tunnel 12,585

Total 123,712

Precipitation

This month = 0.00

October 01, 2022 To date = 17.08

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/30/2024
#### In the Matter of Alex A. Fabricant et al., Respondents, against City of New York, Appellant.

On August 14, 1947, there was a collision between a *976trolley car operated by the City of New York and a taxicab owned by respondent Fabricant and operated by respondent Bernstein. Respondents did not serve a notice of claim within the time required by section 50-e of the General Municipal Law. Two days after the expiration of such period respondents moved for an order granting leave to serve a proposed notice of claim within a reasonable time. The order appealed from grants permission to serve the notices of claim within three days after the entry and service of the order. Pursuant to the permission granted, respondents served notices of claim. Thereafter the comptroller served notices on respondents to appear for examination with respect to the claim, which examination was duly. held. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion denied, without costs. Renewed motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. There is no showing that claimants were so incapacitated within the sixty-day period following the accident that they were unable to serve a notice of claim sworn to by them or by someone on their behalf. The examination of the claimants by the comptroller after the service of the notices of claim, pursuant to the permission granted by the order appealed from, did not bar the city from prosecuting its appeal. *(Matter of Aurieehio*v. *City of New York,.*272 App. Div. 1067.) Lewis, P. J., "Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur. [See *post,*p. 1016.]
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

     Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-068:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of InferX Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  April 14, 2011


By:
/s/ Vijay SuriVijay SuriChief Executive Officer





Dated:  April 14, 2011


By:
/s/ Raimondo PilusoRaimondo PilusoPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer





The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BANK OF NEW YORK f/k/a THE BANK

OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR

THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF THE

CWABS, INC. ASSET BACKED

CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005

- 9,

Appellant,

v.

CHESAPEAKE 34771 LAND TRUST,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00252

- CV

Appeal from the

367th Judicial District Court

of Denton County, Texas

(TC# 2012

- 50971

- 367)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the judgment of the court below and remand the cause for

further proceedings, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We further order that Appellant

recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, Senior Judge

Larsen, Senior Judge, Sitting by Assignment
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAtomic Oxygen Treatment as a Method of Recovering Smoke Damaged PaintingsSmoke damage, as a result of a fire, can be difficult to remove from some types of painting media without causing swelling, leaching or pigment movement or removal. A non-contact technique has been developed which can remove soot from the surface of a painting by use of a gently flowing gas containing atomic oxygen. The atomic oxygen chemically reacts with the soot on the surface creating gasses such as carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide which can be removed through the use of an exhaust system. The reaction is limited to the surface so that the process can be timed to stop when the paint layer is reached. Atomic oxygen is a primary component of the low Earth orbital environment, but can be generated on Earth through various methods. This paper will discuss the results of atomic oxygen treatment of soot exposed acrylic gesso, ink on paper, and a varnished oil painting. Reflectance measurements were used to characterize the surfaces before and after treatment.Document ID19980235569Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsRutledge, Sharon K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Banks, Bruce A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Forkapa, Mark*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Stueber, Thomas*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Sechkar, Edward*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Malinowski, Kevin*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1998Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberE-11355NASA/TM-1998-208507NAS 1.15:208507Meeting InformationMeeting: American Institute for Conservation of Historic ArtworkLocation: Washington, DCCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 3, 1998End Date: June 7, 1998Sponsors:American Inst. for ConservationFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-23-2CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980235569.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Luigi Di Laura et al., Respondents, *v.*State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 28459.)

Fourth Department,

November 2, 1949.

*640
      *Nathaniel L. Goldstein, Attorney-General (Wendell P. Brown, Solicitor-General,*and *Wortley B. Paul*of counsel), for appellant.

*Charles G. Signor*and *Mark Heath*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

The order for examination and production was granted pursuant to the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 17 of the Court of Claims Act and section 296 of the Civil Practice Act. While section 296 of the Civil Practice Act may be held to implement section 17 of the Court of Claims Act *(Buchalter*v. *State of New York,*172 Misc. 420; *Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co.*v. *State of New York,*174 Misc. 743), there is no statutory authority by which the claimant may avail himself of the provisions of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act. In this case it is sought to examine certain State officers and employees in reference to borings, photographs and map which were made more than a year after the claim was filed and which were made by the State in preparation for trial. The order of examination requires production of the stone acquired by the borings, together with the map and photographs. It is apparent that the claimant is seeking to ascertain in advance of trial, the results of the State’s investigation through its experts made in preparation for trial. There is no authority for such examination. Moreover, it does not appear that the examination is necessary to enable the claimant to properly prepare for trial or present his claim to the court.

All concur. Present — -Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Piper, JJ.

Order reversed on the law, without costs of this appeal to either party, and motion denied, without costs.
### §115. Payment of annuities in goods

The President may, at the request of any Indian tribe, to which an annuity is payable in money, cause the same to be paid in goods, purchased as provided in section 91 of this title.

(R.S. §2082.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 91 of this title, referred to in text, was omitted from the Code.

#### Codification

R.S. §2082 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 162, §12, 4 Stat. 737.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of BEFUT International Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hongbo Cao, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: September 27, 2011
By:
/s/ Hongbo CaoHongbo CaoChief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)











This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 20.403 Certificates of disclaimer. ( a ) Each employee of the U.S. Geological Survey, Bureau of Land Management, Minerals Management Service, and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement shall sign a certificate of disclaimer upon entrance to or upon transfer to a position within any of these bureaus. The employee's signature will indicate that he or she: ( 1 ) Is aware of the specific restrictions pertinent to his or her employment; and
( 2 ) Is in compliance with such restrictions.
( b ) If an employee is unable to sign the certificate, he or she must submit a statement of facts to the appropriate ethics counselor for review and appropriate action.
( c ) Signed certificates of disclaimer shall be filed and maintained by the employee's deputy ethics counselor.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 147

 143

 145

 141

 137

 135

 134

 137

 131

 138

 137

 139

 138

 139

 140

 139

 139

 139

 140

 144

 141

 139

 136

 138

 138

 136

 139

 135

 157

 152

 136

 133

 137

 134

 132

 127

 128

 128

 127

 129

 131

 134

 129

 132

 134

 132

 133

 133

 133

 137

 135

 135

 131

 129

 133

 128

 130

 129

 125

 140

 140

 138

 140

 138

 134

 133

 132

 133

 130

 134

 136

 136

 135

 136

 138

 135

 135

 136

 136

 138

 138

 137

 135

 134

 136

 133

 135

 132

 141

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### § 900.3 Composition.

Pursuant to the Bylaws, the Joint Board consists of three members appointed by the Secretary of the Treasury and two members appointed by the Secretary of Labor. The Board elects a Chairman and a Secretary from among the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Labor members. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation may designate a non-voting representative to sit with, and participate in, the discussions of the Board. All decisions of the Board are made by simple majority vote.

[81 FR 8833, Feb. 23, 2016]