alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 203

 210

 196

 189

 186

 176

 186

 174

 164

 161

 156

 141

 142

 146

 149

 144

 148

 133

 112

 118

 126

 126

 114

 133

 139

 147

 175

 190

 137

 148

 181

 163

 160

 167

 171

 136

 165

 164

 163

 156

 150

 139

 133

 120

 136

 140

 137

 131

 109

 97

 97

 115

 105

 102

 103

 109

 123

 127

 127

 122

 121

 141

 177

 172

 178

 178

 171

 171

 171

 167

 160

 155

 146

 139

 136

 142

 144

 141

 139

 119

 103

 109

 120

 110

 105

 115

 116

 136

 142

 138

 125

 136

 157

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOAQUIN PENA DE LOS SANTOS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71998

Agency No. A077-123-105

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 15, 2013** 

Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Joaquin Pena De Los Santos, a native and citizen of the Dominican

Republic, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We

FILED

JAN 16 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-71998

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and

remand.

Because it is unclear whether the agency applied the modified categorical

approach to Pena De Los Santos’s conviction, we remand the case to the BIA for

further proceedings. See United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020, 1022-23

(9th Cir. 2001) (recognizing that the conduct encompassed by section 12021(a)(1)

of the California Penal Code may not categorically constitute an aggravated

felony); see also 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(E)(ii) (including firearms offenses

described in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in the definition of an aggravated felony);

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (punishing possession of a firearm by any person who has

been convicted of a crime “punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one

year”).

In light of this disposition, we decline to address Pena De Los Santos’s

remaining challenges to the BIA’s order. See Mendez-Alcaraz v. Gonzales,

464 F.3d 842, 844 (9th Cir. 2006) (declining to reach nondispositive challenges to

a BIA order).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Statement of Income and the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          20,076
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  342,495
<ALLOWANCES>                                    15,847
<INVENTORY>                                    122,536
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               586,790
<PP&E>                                       3,835,880
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,685,079
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,044,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          851,374
<BONDS>                                      1,463,756
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          502,232
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           855
<OTHER-SE>                                     885,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,044,638
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,285,370
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,166,525
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (10,374)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,274
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (952)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (2,872)
<NET-INCOME>                                     (697)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------



                                            [GRAPHIC OMITTED] Countrywide(R)
                                            --------------------------------
                                                       HOME LOANS

                                                   400 Countrywide Way
March 10, 2006                              Simi Valley, California 93065-6298






Sidley Austin, LLP
Re: BellaVista 2005-1, BellaVista 2005-2
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
Attn: Rebecca Bonventre


                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE


I, Joseph Candelario, hereby certify that I am the First Vice President, Loan
Administration of Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., fka Countrywide Funding
Corporation. I further certify, with respect to the Servicing Agreements for
Countrywide Mortgage Obligations, Inc., the following:

I have reviewed the activities and performance of the Servicer during the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 under the Agreements and, to the best of
my knowledge, based on my review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
duties, responsibilities or obligations under the Agreements throughout the
fiscal year.


                                      March 10, 2006
-------------------------             --------------------
Joseph Candelario                     Date
First Vice President
Compliance Officer
Loan Administration
#### Raymond Bradley, Respondent, v. Walter Blount et al., Defendants, and Rochester Transit Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

*905Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.
### §1616k. Nursing residency program

#### (a) Establishment

The Secretary, acting through the Service, shall establish a program to enable licensed practical nurses, licensed vocational nurses, and registered nurses who are working in an Indian health program (as defined in section 1616a(a)(2)(A) of this title), and have done so for a period of not less than one year, to pursue advanced training.

#### (b) Program components

Such program shall include a combination of education and work study in an Indian health program (as defined in section 1616a(a)(2)(A) of this title) leading to an associate or bachelor's degree (in the case of a licensed practical nurse or licensed vocational nurse) or a bachelor's degree (in the case of a registered nurse) or a Master's degree.

#### (c) Service obligation of program participant

An individual who participates in a program under subsection (a), where the educational costs are paid by the Service, shall incur an obligation to serve in an Indian health program for a period of obligated service equal to at least three times the period of time during which the individual participates in such program. In the event that the individual fails to complete such obligated service, the United States shall be entitled to recover from such individual an amount determined in accordance with the formula specified in subsection (l) of section 1616a of this title in the manner provided for in such subsection.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title I, §118, as added Pub. L. 102–573, title I, §104(e), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4534; amended Pub. L. 103–435, §16(b), Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4573.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–435 inserted before period at end "or a Master's degree".
**EXHIBIT 99(iii)**

**GULLEDGE REALTY INVESTORS II, L.P. (A Limited Partnership)**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ASDOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Douglas L. Kelly, certify that:

-  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gulledge Realty Investors II, L.P.;    
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make  the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;    
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information  included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant  as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;    
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing    and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange    Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:       - Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material	information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,	is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the	period in which this report is being prepared;    
  - Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and	procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and    
  - Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on  our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee  of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):       - All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,	summarize and report financial information; and    
  - Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees	who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.              Date:  November 13, 2003  
/s/ Douglas L. Kelly
Douglas L. Kelly

President, Secretary, 
Treasurer and Director
### §1750d. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 105–83, title VII, §706, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1626, which identified the Miccosukee Indian Reservation lands, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
(No. 4648

#### Alexander V. Capraro, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June*24, *1955.*

Tooco and Tocco, Attorneys for Claimant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; Marion G. Tiernan, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Wham, J.

The complaint filed herein alleges that claimant, an architect and engineer with offices in Chicago, and licensed to practice in the State of Illinois, entered into a contract with respondent to perform architectural and • engineering services with regard to the construction of an addition to the highway police radio station at Ma-comb, Illinois, which contract is dated February 6, 1952, a true and correct photostatic copy of same being attached to said complaint, and marked exhibit A.

Claimant contends that the services were rendered and accepted by respondent under the terms of the contract, and that there is now due and owing a balance of $910.50.

A stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent waiving the necessity of taking testimony and filing briefs and arguments, and submitting the case to the Court for consideration on the above amount.

Claimant’s exhibit B, a letter directed to claimant, and signed by Louis H. Gerding, Supervising Architect of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, acknowledges that said above named sum is due and owing claimant, as the unpaid balance under the terms of the *202contract. The Departmental Report filed by respondent, and signed by E. A. Rosenstone, Director of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, acknowledges that under the terms of the contract no legal objection can be raised against the payment of the $910.50 balance due. The Supplemental Departmental Report, signed by E. A. Rosenstone, also acknowledges said balance being due and owing.

The only controversy in the case when originally filed related to claimant’s contention that an additional $267.60 was due and owing for additional and extra engineering aid and advice. This was disputed by respondent, and a motion to strike and dismiss that portion of claimant’s complaint referring to said sum was filed.

Subsequent to the filing of said motion, and prior to the submission of this case to the Court for decision, claimant and respondent entered into a stipulation wherein said motion was withdrawn, and claimant amended the prayer of said complaint to pray for judgment against respondent in the amount now claimed, being the amount of $910.50. There being no further dispute in this matter between the parties hereto, and it appearing to the Court that the only balance due and owing claimant under .the terms of and by virtue of thei contract mentioned herein is $910.50; and it further appearing that said amount is a just and correct claim, said claim is, therefore, allowed, and claimant shall have and recover from respondent the sum of $910.50.
### **CHAPTER 27—TRIBALLY CONTROLLED SCHOOL GRANTS**

Sec.
2501.
Declaration of policy.
2502.
Grants authorized.
2502a.
Retrocession or re-assumption of Indian education funds.
2503.
Composition of grants.
2504.
Eligibility for grants.
2505.
Duration of eligibility determination.
2506.
Payment of grants; investment of funds.
2507.
Application with respect to Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act.
2508.
Role of the Director.
2509.
Regulations.
2510.
The tribally controlled grant school endowment program.
2511.
Definitions.
#### § 702.232 Payments without an award; when; how paid.

The first installment of compensation shall become due by the fourteenth (14th) day after the employer has been notified, through the designated official or by any other means described in § 702.211 *et seq.,* or has actual knowledge of the injury or death. All compensation due on that fourteenth (14th) day shall be paid then and appropriate compensation due thereafter must be paid in semi-monthly installments, unless the district director determines otherwise.

[50 FR 399, Jan. 3, 1985]
#### Harry Bard et al., Respondents, v. Milmar Appliance Parts & Service Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant-appellant to answer the complaint herein within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P„ Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mary Regan, Relator, v. Joseph P. Hennessy and Others, Composing the Board of Assessors of the City of New York, and Others, Respondents.*

*

 See Greater ¡N. Y. Charter (Laws of 1901, chap. 466), § 951; since amd. by Laws of 1912, chap. 483.— [Rep.

Writ of certiorari dismissed, with fifty dollar's costs and disbursements, upon the ground that the grade had not been established in Twentieth street, between Tenth avenue and Vanderbilt street, by lawful authority, at the time the relator’s house was built, and that the property has not been improved in conformity with any established grade. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., Concurred.
Exhibit 10.17

June 30, 2007

Chesapeake Capital Corporation
500 Forest Avenue
Richmond, VA 23229

Attention: Mr. John M. Hoade

Re:    Management Agreement Renewals

Dear Mr. Hoade:

We are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the ‘‘Management Agreements’’). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2008 and all other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged.

| |   |                                         
| | - | ----------------------------------------
| | • | Smith Barney Tidewater Futures Fund L.P.

| |   |           
| | - | ----------
| | • | AURORA III

Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Ms. Jennifer Magro at the address above or fax to 212-793-1986. If you have any questions I can be reached at 212-559-5046.

Very truly yours,

CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC

By:/s/ Jennifer Magro
Jennifer Magro
Chief Financial Officer & Director

By:/s/ John M. Hoade

Print Name:John M. Hoade

JM/sr

---
§ 702.285 Report of earnings. ( a ) An employer, carrier or the Director (for those cases being paid from the Special Fund) may require an employee to whom it is paying compensation to submit a report on earnings from employment or self-employment. This report may not be required any more frequently than semi-annually. The report shall be made on a form prescribed by the Director and shall include all earnings from employment and self-employment and the periods for which the earnings apply. The employee must return the complete report on earnings even where he or she has no earnings to report.
( b ) For these purposes the term “earnings” is defined as all monies received from any employment and includes but is not limited to wages, salaries, tips, sales commissions, fees for services provided, piecework and all revenue received from self-employment even if the business or enterprise operated at a loss of if the profits were reinvested.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0160) [50 FR 400, Jan. 3, 1985]
### SUBCHAPTER II—AUTHORITIES
### **CHAPTER 32A—CULTURAL AND HERITAGE COOPERATION AUTHORITY**

Sec.
3051.
Purposes.
3052.
Definitions.
3053.
Reburial of human remains and cultural items.
3054.
Temporary closure for traditional and cultural purposes.
3055.
Forest products for traditional and cultural purposes.
3056.
Prohibition on disclosure.
3057.
Severability and savings provisions.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 526.90

 527.12

 527.44

 527.77

 528.36

 528.63

 528.97

 529.28

 529.56

 529.82

 529.96

 530.16

 530.25

 530.29

 530.29

 530.29

 529.87

 529.17

 529.13

 528.85

 528.47

 528.09

 528.03

 527.95

 527.98

 528.03

 527.71

 527.44

 527.08

 526.74

 1,826,881

 1,829,577

 1,833,502

 1,837,553

 1,844,802

 1,848,123

 1,852,308

 1,856,127

 1,859,578

 1,862,785

 1,864,512

 1,866,981

 1,868,093

 1,868,587

 1,868,587

 1,868,587

 1,863,402

 1,854,771

 1,854,279

 1,850,831

 1,846,155

 1,841,484

 1,840,746

 1,839,763

 1,840,132

 1,840,746

 1,836,816

 1,833,502

 1,829,087

 1,824,920

STORAGE

-3,922

+2,696

+3,925

+4,051

+7,249

+3,321

+4,185

+3,819

+3,451

+3,207

+1,727

+2,469

+1,112

+494

+0

+0

-5,185

-8,631

-492

-3,448

-4,676

-4,671

-738

-983

+369

+614

-3,930

-3,314

-4,415

-4,167

CHANGE

0

2,393

2,330

2,273

4,460

2,320

2,678

2,380

2,324

2,223

1,459

1,823

1,030

258

0

386

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

97

1,136

386

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 1,876

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,439

 4,120

 0

 1,542

 2,050

 2,049

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,974

 1,458

 2,050

 1,870

POWER

 95

 140

 178

 151

 132

 179

 173

 175

 190

 196

 199

 173

 209

 213

 195

 209

 212

 198

 192

 227

 226

 228

 218

 215

 216

 189

 213

 214

 200

 156

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-6

-894

-173

-79

-674

-466

-394

-279

-394

-411

-389

-404

-260

+204

+195

-177

+37

-33

-56

+31

-82

-77

-154

-377

-734

+112

+206

+1

+24

-75

OR

 119

 150

 103

 60

 12

 115

 139

 139

 140

 207

 188

 140

 140

 200

 203

 239

 239

 398

 227

 195

 266

 278

 330

 298

 202

 179

 250

 230

 147

 127

C.F.S.

 .30

 .38

 .26

 .15

 .03

 .29

 .35

 .35

 .35

 .52

 .47

 .35

 .35

 .50

 .52

 .60

 .60

 .40

 .57

 .49

 .00

 .70

 .83

 .75

 .51

 .45

 .63

 .00

 .00

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .17

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR July 1, 2011

DAILY OPERATIONS

JUNE 2011 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -5,883 29,956 21,428 5,711 0 -5,778 5,660 12.02 .33

ACRE-FEET -5,883 59,418 42,502 11,328 0 -11,461 11,227

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 42,502

PACHECO TUNNEL 11,328 TOTAL 53,830

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = 11.15

 1,830,803

SPILL 0 .33

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2208 Requirements for payment. ( a ) The State VR agency must file a claim for payment in each individual case within the time periods specified in § 416.2216;
( b ) The claim for payment must be in a form prescribed by us and contain the following information: ( 1 ) A description of each service provided;
( 2 ) When the service was provided; and
( 3 ) The cost of the service;
( c ) The VR services for which payment is being requested must have been provided during the period specified in § 416.2215;
( d ) The VR services for which payment is being requested must have been provided under a State plan for VR services approved under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and must be services that are described in § 416.2214;
( e ) The individual must meet one of the VR payment provisions specified in § 416.2201;
( f ) The State VR agency must maintain, and provide as we may require, adequate documentation of all services and costs for all disabled or blind recipients with respect to whom a State VR agency could potentially request payment for services and costs under this subpart; and
( g ) The amount to be paid must be reasonable and necessary and be in compliance with the cost guidelines specified in § 416.2217.
[48 FR 6297, Feb. 10, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 8456, Mar. 8, 1990; 59 FR 11918, Mar. 15, 1994; 83 FR 62460, Dec. 4, 2018]