alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FAMOUS
DAVE'S OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 4, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-QSB
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1999
<CASH>                                         717,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,517,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,081,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,259,000
<PP&E>                                      44,002,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,071,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,522,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,725,000
<BONDS>                                      5,328,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    42,814,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (10,345,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,522,000
<SALES>                                     23,019,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,019,000
<CGS>                                        7,944,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               23,591,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (37,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (609,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (609,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (609,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 840.13

 840.18

 840.23

 840.26

 840.32

 840.36

 840.40

 840.44

 840.46

 840.48

 840.50

 840.51

 840.50

 840.50

 840.51

 840.52

 840.53

 840.54

 840.55

 840.55

 840.54

 840.56

 840.52

 840.52

 840.52

 840.53

 840.53

 840.53

 840.54

 840.54

 840.55

 49.26

 49.33

 49.39

 49.43

 49.51

 49.56

 49.61

 49.66

 49.69

 49.71

 49.74

 49.75

 49.74

 49.74

 49.75

 49.76

 49.78

 49.79

 49.80

 49.80

 49.79

 49.82

 49.76

 49.76

 49.76

 49.78

 49.78

 49.78

 49.79

 49.79

 49.80

STORAGE

+0.07

+0.06

+0.06

+0.04

+0.08

+0.05

+0.05

+0.05

+0.03

+0.03

+0.03

+0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.01

+0.01

+0.01

+0.01

+0.01

+0.00

-0.01

+0.03

-0.05

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.01

CHANGE

75

73

73

61

82

69

68

70

56

57

59

53

41

44

51

52

52

54

53

47

37

59

58

39

39

47

44

45

54

46

53

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

SPILL

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 54

 11

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 17

 16

 16

 16

 18

 18

 17

 17

 16

 17

 19

 20

 20

 17

 18

 18

 18

 20

 19

 20

 17

 19

 18

 16

 12

 13

 17

 18

 20

 19

 19

C.F.S.

 .41

 .39

 .40

 .39

 .43

 .45

 .42

 .42

 .40

 .42

 .46

 .48

 .48

 .42

 .43

 .45

 .43

 .49

 .46

 .48

 .41

 .47

 .45

 .40

 .30

 .32

 .42

 .45

 .50

 .47

 .46

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 RUN DATE: 03/11/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.60 1,711 500 358 545 13.36 .00

ACRE-FEET +600 3,394 992 710 1,081

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 710

OUTLET

TOTAL

 992

 1,702

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2003 .00

 49.20

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

February-11

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG dat Preliminary Data - Subject to change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-11 5000 5 0 132 26 3 0 0 0 3 0 87 17 6,438 2-Feb-11 8440 12 4 144 30 5 3 3 0 8 3 95 20 5,177 

3-Feb-11 0000 0 0 144 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 20 4,758 4-Feb-11 0000 0 0 144 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 20 4,427 5-Feb-11 0000 0 0 144 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 20 4,392 6-Feb-11 0000 0 0 144 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 20 4,936 7-Feb-11 0030 3 0 147 30 0 0 2 0 2 0 97 20 5,842 8-Feb-11 0040 4 0 151 30 0 0 3 0 3 0 100 20 5,663 9-Feb-11 0000 0 0 151 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 20 6,193 

10-Feb-11 8000 8 0 159 30 5 0 0 0 5 0 105 20 6,310 11-Feb-11 10 4 0 0 10 4 169 34 7 3 0 0 7 3 112 22 7,095 

12-Feb-11 4440 8 4 177 38 3 3 3 0 5 3 117 25 6,691 13-Feb-11 0000 0 0 177 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 25 7,029 14-Feb-11 0400 0 4 177 42 0 3 0 0 0 3 117 28 7,038 15-Feb-11 6800 6 8 183 50 4 5 0 0 4 5 121 33 6,940 16-Feb-11 0 4 16 12 16 16 199 66 0 3 11 8 11 11 131 44 6,437 

17-Feb-11 10 4 0 4 10 8 209 74 7 3 0 3 7 5 138 49 6,347 

18-Feb-11 20 0 0 4 20 4 229 78 13 0 0 3 13 3 151 51 5,882 

19-Feb-11 22 0 4 0 26 0 255 78 15 0 3 0 17 0 168 51 6,662 

20-Feb-11 42 8 4 0 46 8 301 86 28 5 3 0 30 5 199 57 7,038 

21-Feb-11 28 12 8 0 36 12 337 98 18 8 5 0 24 8 222 65 7,241 

22-Feb-11 42 24 4 4 46 28 383 126 28 16 3 3 30 18 253 83 5,985 

23-Feb-11 8843 12 11 395 137 5 5 3 2 8 7 261 90 5,937 

24-Feb-11 4 8 12 0 16 8 411 145 3 5 8 0 11 5 271 96 5,562 

25-Feb-11 8444 12 8 423 153 5 3 3 3 8 5 279 101 4,836 

26-Feb-11 4040 8 0 431 153 3 0 3 0 5 0 284 101 4,836 27-Feb-11 12 4 4 8 16 12 447 165 8 3 3 5 11 8 295 109 4,930 28-Feb-11 18 4 2 0 20 4 467 169 12 3 1 0 13 3 308 112 5,118 

Total 259 104 81 39 340 143 467 169 171 69 53 26 224 94 308 112 165,740 8

Banks Tr
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
Youhave reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection(FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in theFDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suiteof cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).
**Title:****Making the invisible visible : a historyof the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971-2003)
 
PDF | EPUB | Mobi
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.21:2017-4547
Item Number:0830-I (online)
CGP System Number:001026011
 
 
 
** 
**Permanent Public Access
** 
Title 44 of  the United States Code (44 U.S.C. Section 1911) stipulates that public access  to official Government information products disseminated through the Federal  Depository Library Program (FDLP) must be maintained permanently in regional  depository libraries and by depository libraries not served by a regional  library. Since online products are not physically distributed to depository  libraries for retention, GPO has assumed responsibility for the provision of  permanent access to Government information products residing on FDsys  servers.
GPO's  permanent public access commitment is also met by bringing  agency-disseminated Internet resources under the purview of GPO and  incorporating them into a digital archive. GPO captures copies of agency  electronic information products, and creates PURLs so that users will be  automatically redirected to the archived products if the information is no  longer accessible on the agency Web site. Please refer to the report Managing  the FDLP Electronic Collection: A Policy and Planning Document for more  information.
 
August 17, 2017********
**Exhibit
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, James Doss, Chief Financial Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge:




|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
                September 11, 2008
            
            /s/
                James DossJames
                DossChief
                Financial Officer
*

Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by

designation. 

Shari L. LYES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF RIVIERA BEACH, FLORIDA, Cinthia Becton, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-4577.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

March 10, 1999

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 95-8285-CIV-KLR);

Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Judge.

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, and KRAVITCH and WOOD*

, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with the opinion of the en banc court, dated February 11, 1999, reversing in part and

affirming in part, we remand this case to the district court for disposition consistent with that opinion.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
§ 1.6 Disciplinary proceedings. ( a ) Disciplinary proceedings may be instituted against anyone who is practicing or has practiced before the Department on grounds that he is incompetent, unethical, or unprofessional, or that he is practicing without authority under the provisions of this part, or that he has violated any provisions of the laws and regulations governing practice before the Department, or that he has been disbarred or suspended by any court or administrative agency. Individuals practicing before the Department should observe the Canons of Professional Ethics of the American Bar Association and those of the Federal Bar Association, by which the Department will be guided in disciplinary matters.
( b ) Whenever in the discretion of the Solicitor the circumstances warrant consideration of the question whether disciplinary action should be taken against an individual who is practicing or has practiced before the Department, the Solicitor shall appoint a hearing officer to consider and dispose of the case. The hearing officer shall give the individual adequate notice of, and an opportunity for a hearing on, the specific charges against him. The hearing shall afford the individual an opportunity to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses. The hearing officer shall render a decision either ( 1 ) dismissing the charges, or
( 2 ) reprimanding the individual or suspending or excluding him from practice before the Department.
( c ) Within 30 days after receipt of the decision of the hearing officer reprimanding, suspending, or excluding an individual from practice before the Department, an appeal may be filed with the Solicitor, whose decision shall be final.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  May 15, 2006

/s/Ann F. Massey
--------------------------------
Name:    Ann F. Massey
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Ultitek. Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Paul Freed, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                May 14, 2007
            
            /s/ PAUL
                FREEDPaul
                FreedChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




For the month of June 2003

Commission File Number 333-7182-01

                                   CEZ, a. s.
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                   Form 20-F. X              Form 40-F
                             ---                       ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes               No  X
                               ---              ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>
The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s. in the Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:


                   Shareholders with stakes of more than 3 %

According to the extract from the shareholders list of CEZ, a. s., as at June
11, 2003, the only shareholder with a stake of more than 3 % is the National
Property Fund of the Czech Republic. Its stake amounts to 67.612 % of the
company's registered capital.

<PAGE>
                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                               CEZ, a. s.
                                         ------------------------
                                               (Registrant)

Date:  June 13, 2003

                                         By:  /s/ Libuse Latalova
                                            ---------------------
                                              Libuse Latalova
                                        Head of Finance Administration
#### § 703.206 [Reserved]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

FREDERICK UPCHURCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1178

[May 5, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Robert Panse, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502018MM012801A.

Robert S. Gershman of Gershman & Gershman, P.A., Delray Beach, 

for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melynda L. Melear, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §288b. Baggage and effects of officers and employees exempted from customs duties and internal revenue taxes

Pursuant to regulations prescribed by the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection with the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury, the baggage and effects of alien officers and employees of international organizations, or of aliens designated by foreign governments to serve as their representatives in or to such organizations, or of the families, suites, and servants of such officers, employees, or representatives shall be admitted (when imported in connection with the arrival of the owner) free of customs duties and free of internal-revenue taxes imposed upon or by reason of importation.

(Dec. 29, 1945, ch. 652, title I, §3, 59 Stat. 669; Pub. L. 114–125, title VIII, §802(d)(2), Feb. 24, 2016, 130 Stat. 210.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection" substituted for "Commissioner of Customs" in text on authority of section 802(d)(2) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6, Domestic Security.

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of Nov. 25, 2002, see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of the Department of the Treasury, with certain exceptions, to the Secretary of the Treasury, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 26, §§1, 2, eff. July 31, 1950, 15 F.R. 4935, 64 Stat. 1280, 1281, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees. The Commissioner of Customs, referred to in text, was an officer of the Treasury Department.
#### § 702.413 Fees for medical services; prevailing community charges.

All fees charged by medical care providers for persons covered by this Act shall be limited to such charges for the same or similar care (including supplies) as prevails in the community in which the medical care provider is located and shall not exceed the customary charges of the medical care provider for the same or similar services. Where a dispute arises concerning the amount of a medical bill, the Director shall determine the prevailing community rate using the OWCP Medical Fee Schedule (as described in 20 CFR 10.805 *through 10.810*) to the extent appropriate, and where not appropriate, may use other state or federal fee schedules. The opinion of the Director that a charge by a medical care provider disputed under the provisions of section 702.414 exceeds the charge which prevails in the community in which said medical care provider is located shall constitute sufficient evidence to warrant further proceedings pursuant to section 702.414 and to permit the Director to direct the claimant to select another medical provider for care to the claimant.

[60 FR 51348, Oct. 2, 1995, as amended at 77 FR 37286, June 21, 2012]
Fibst Department,

February, 1949.

(February 7, 1949.)

#### Delancey Street Corporation, Respondent, v. Sarah Barocas et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present— Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.