alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                           CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC.
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Fiscal Year                                        Six-Months Ended
                      -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          1994           1995           1996             1997            1998          1998          1999
                      ------------- -------------- ---------------  --------------  -------------- ------------  ------------
<S>                   <C>           <C>            <C>              <C>             <C>            <C>           <C>
Pretax income
from continuing
operations            $      66,908 $       91,975 $        91,925  $      117,371  $      156,798 $     72,347  $     82,579
                      ============= ============== ===============  ==============  ============== ============  ============
Fixed charges:
Interest expense      $       1,285 $        2,668 $         2,174  $        1,198  $       15,833 $      5,477  $     13,314

Interest portion
(1/3) of rentals                800            967           1,100             100           2,100          633         2,148
                      ------------- -------------- ---------------  --------------  -------------- ------------  ------------
Total fixed
charges               $       2,085 $        3,635 $         3,274  $        1,298  $       17,933 $      6,110  $     15,462
                      ============= ============== ===============  ==============  ============== ============  ============
Pretax income
from continuing
operations plus
fixed charges         $      68,993 $       95,610 $        95,199  $      118,669  $      174,731 $     78,457  $     98,041
                      ============= ============== ===============  ==============  ============== ============  ============
Ratio of earnings
to fixed charges               33.1           26.3            29.1            91.4             9.7         12.8           6.3
                      ============= ============== ===============  ==============  ============== ============  ============
</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 727.62

 727.63

 727.63

 727.63

 727.63

 727.63

 727.63

 727.64

 727.64

 727.65

 727.65

 727.64

 727.63

 727.62

 727.61

 727.61

 727.61

 727.60

 727.59

 727.58

 727.58

 727.58

 727.58

 727.58

 727.60

 727.60

 727.61

 727.62

 727.64

 727.64

 727.64

 1,477

 1,478

 1,478

 1,478

 1,478

 1,478

 1,478

 1,478

 1,478

 1,479

 1,479

 1,478

 1,478

 1,477

 1,477

 1,477

 1,477

 1,477

 1,476

 1,476

 1,476

 1,476

 1,476

 1,476

 1,477

 1,477

 1,477

 1,477

 1,478

 1,478

 1,478

STORAGE

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

-1

+0

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

CHANGE

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

-1

0

-1

0

0

0

0

-1

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

0

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2021

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1 1 0 0

ACRE-FEET +1 2 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 1,477

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
#### Albert Burke, Respondent, v. Pittsburg Contracting Company, Appellant.

Judgement and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105

- 2498

OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

May 7, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Toyota M eeting with EPA R egarding Proposal for 2017

- 2025 Light

- Duty (LD)

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Robin Moran, Senior Policy Advisor

TO: EPA Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0799

This memo documents meeting s held on January 6 and 12 , 2012 between representatives of

Toyot a, EPA , and NHTSA to discuss Toyota’s comments on the LD GHG proposed rule

. The

meeting attendees included the following:

Toyota : Rick Gezelle and Matt Kevnick

EPA : Bill Charmley , Robin Moran, Arvon Mitcham, Christopher Lieske, Brian Nelson

NHTSA : Jim Tamm, Rebecca Yoon

The topics discussed included off

- cycle credits, upstream emissions from electric vehicles,

relative stringency between the EPA

- NHTSA programs, mid

- term review, air conditioning

credits, and pickup truck hybrid credits.
#### § 702.234 Report by employer of commencement and suspension of payments.

Immediately upon making the first payment of compensation, and upon the suspension of payments once begun, the employer must notify the district director who is administering the claim of the commencement or suspension of payments, as the case may be.

[80 FR 12929, Mar. 12, 2015]
* Pursuant to 5th CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20139

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES of AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DELANO R. MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

 (H-96-CR-219-1) 

November 4, 1997

Before JOHNSON, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Delano Martin appeals his sentence contending that the

district court erred in departing upward. Specifically, Martin

argues that no basis exists for the district court’s departure and

that the district court’s asserted justification for its departure

is encompassed by U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1(b)(4). 

Since Martin failed to raise these issues below, we review for

plain error only. United States v. McDowell, 109 F.3d 214, 216
2

(5th Cir. 1997). Under Federal Criminal Rule of Procedure 52(b),

this court may correct forfeited errors only when an appellant

shows that there is an error, the error is clear or obvious, and

the error affects his substantial rights. Id.; United States v.

Calverly, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), cert.

denied, 513 U.S. 1196 (1995). Even if these factors are

established, this court may decline to exercise its discretion and

correct the error unless the error “seriously affects the fairness,

integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”

McDowell, 109 F.3d at 216. After carefully reviewing the record in

the present case, we hold that the district court’s decision to

depart upward does not present plain error requiring correction.

The district court gave acceptable reasons for its departure, and

the extent of the departure was not unreasonable in light of

Martin’s conduct.

Martin also contends that defense counsel rendered ineffective

assistance at sentencing by failing to object to the upward

departure. Since Martin’s claim refers to matters outside the

record, we decline to address this issue. See United States v.

Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 313-14 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 484

U.S. 1075 (1988).

Therefore, for the foregoing reasons, the district court’s

judgment is 

AFFIRMED.
#### John Alvin Young, Respondent, v. Archibald S. White, Appellant.

(No. 2)

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
**Bank
                of America N.A.**
              900
                West Trade Street
              Suite
                650
              NC1-026-06-01Charlotte,
                NC 28255www.bankamerica.com













**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**


**OFFICER’S
      CERTIFICATE** ****


**(Fashion
      Show Mall Whole Loan)**





Re:
            Banc
                of America Commercial Mortgage Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
                Certificates, Series 2005-2 (the “Trust”), created pursuant to that
                certain pooling and servicing agreement, dated as of June 1, 2005
                (the
                “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), among Banc of America Commercial
                Mortgage Inc., as depositor, Bank of America, N.A., as master servicer,
                Midland Loan Services, Inc., as special servicer, LaSalle Bank National
                Association, as trustee and REMIC administrator and ABN Amro Bank
                N.V., as
                fiscal agent




In
      connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
      behalf of Bank of America, N.A. as master servicer (the “Lead Servicer”), with
      respect to the Fashion Show Mall Whole Loan, (as defined in the Pooling and
      Servicing Agreement) a part of which is included in the Trust, under that
      certain pooling and servicing agreement (the “ Lead
      Servicing Agreement ”)
      dated
      as of April 1, 2005, among Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc., as
      depositor, the Lead Servicer, J.E. Robert Company, Inc., as special servicer,
      and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee and REMIC administrator, hereby certifies
      that (i) with respect to the Fashion Show Mall Whole Loan, a review of the
      activities for the period ending December 31, 2005 and of the Lead Servicer’s
      performance under the Lead Servicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2005, have
      been made under my supervision; (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on
      such
      review, the Lead Servicer, with respect to the Fashion Show Mall Whole Loan,
      has
      fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreements in all material respects
      throughout the aforementioned period; and (iii) the Lead Servicer, with respect
      to the Fashion Show Mall Whole Loan, has received no notice regarding
      qualification, or challenging the status, of any portion of the Trust fund
      as a
      REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or
      body.











Bank
      of
      America, N.A.








/s/
      Sean D. Reilly


Sean
      D.
      Reilly


Principal








/s/
      H.
      Michael Lumadue


H.
      Michael Lumadue


Vice
      President
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.11 Effect on other regulations; forms and instructions. ( a ) *Effect on other regulations.* All regulations, orders, or like directions heretofore issued by any officer of the Department which impose requirements designed to prohibit any discrimination against individuals on the grounds of race, color, or national origin under any program to which this regulation applies and which authorize the suspension or termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance to any applicant for or recipient of such assistance for failure to comply with such requirements are hereby superseded to the extent that such discrimination is prohibited by this part, except that nothing in this part shall be deemed to relieve any person of any obligation assumed or imposed under any such superseded regulation, order, instruction, or like direction prior to the effective date of this regulation. Nothing in this regulation, however, shall be deemed to supersede any of the following (including future amendments thereof): ( 1 ) Executive Orders 10925, 11114 and 11246, as amended and regulations issued thereunder,
( 2 ) Executive Order 11063 and regulations issued thereunder, or any other regulations or instructions insofar as such order, regulations, or instructions prohibit discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in any program or situation to which this part is inapplicable, or prohibit discrimination on any other ground.
( b ) *Forms and instructions.* The Secretary or his designee shall issue and promptly make available to interested persons instructions and procedures for effectuating this part as applied to programs to which this part applies and for which he is responsible.
( c ) *Supervision and coordination.* The Secretary may from time to time assign to such officials of the Department as he deems appropriate, or to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government with the consent of such departments or agencies, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI of the act and this part (other than responsibility for final decision as provided in § 17.9), including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the Department and within the Executive Branch of the Government in the application of title VI of the act and this part to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this paragraph shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the Secretary of the Interior.
[29 FR 16293, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 43 FR 4259, Feb. 1, 1978]
**Exhibit 24.4**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

As a director of NewPage Holding Corporation, aDelaware corporation, and of NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the “***Company***”), I hereby constitute and appoint Douglas K. Cooper, David J. Prystash, and George F. Martin, and each of them, with fullpower to act without the others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (“***Form 10-K***”), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents inconnection with the Form 10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and aboutthe premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue of this Power of Attorney. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 15th day ofFebruary, 2011.
SUMMARY OF PRINCIPAL TERMS OF ORAL AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN 
RICHARD OWEN AND FREZER INC. Dated December 1, 2005





1.

Richard Owen shall create for and submit to Frezer, Inc. four graphic designs for use in company brochures.

2.

Richard Owen shall create for and submit to Frezer, Inc. four graphic designs, five html documents and four graphic files (jpeg or GIF) for use in company website(s).

3.

Richard Owen shall assist  Frezer Inc. in trade show planning, specifically designing and printing exhibit material, identify appropriate industry trade shows and coordinate exhibit space.

4.

All graphic designs, html documents and graphic files created by Richard Owen pursuant to this agreement shall become the property of Frezer, Inc.

5.

As consideration to Richard Owen for entering into this agreement, Frezer Inc. Richard Owen shall receive 57,916 shares of common stock valued at $11,187.

6.

A legend shall be placed on the certificate that evidences the shares of common stock issued to Richard Owen pursuant to this agreement stating that the shares of common stock have not been registered under the Act and setting forth or referring to the restrictions on transferability and sale of the shares of common stock.

7.

There is no risk of forfeiture of the shares by Mr. Owen in the event that any or none of the work created by Richard Owen is not utilized by Frezer, Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 829.77

 829.20

 828.62

 828.02

 827.79

 828.31

 828.75

 829.01

 829.19

 829.34

 829.47

 829.51

 829.51

 829.41

 829.30

 829.15

 828.97

 828.80

 828.61

 828.40

 828.18

 827.96

 828.28

 828.84

 829.78

 830.04

 830.13

 830.15

 830.06

 829.94

 829.78

 36.95

 36.33

 35.71

 35.07

 34.82

 35.37

 35.85

 36.13

 36.32

 36.48

 36.63

 36.67

 36.67

 36.56

 36.40

 36.28

 36.08

 35.90

 35.70

 35.47

 35.24

 35.00

 35.34

 35.94

 36.96

 37.43

 37.35

 37.37

 37.27

 37.14

 36.96

STORAGE

-0.45

-0.62

-0.63

-0.64

-0.24

+0.55

+0.47

+0.28

+0.20

+0.16

+0.14

+0.04

+0.00

-0.11

-0.16

-0.12

-0.19

-0.18

-0.21

-0.23

-0.23

-0.23

+0.34

+0.60

+1.02

+0.47

-0.08

+0.02

-0.10

-0.13

-0.18

CHANGE

463

377

375

367

334

638

599

501

458

442

433

382

360

305

280

298

262

269

257

247

242

242

246

357

568

582

321

372

311

294

273

INFLOW

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

SPILL

 660

 660

 660

 660

 426

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

 44

 24

 24

 317

 330

 330

 330

 330

 330

OUTLET

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .06

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .78

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .69

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 RUN DATE: 03/29/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.44 11,455 10,735 930 12 .42 1.51

ACRE-FEET -440 22,721 21,293 1,845 24

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,845

OUTLET

TOTAL

 21,293

 23,138

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.51

JULY 1, 2012 13.69

 37.40

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                              66
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,716
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,116
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            9,213
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (65,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,716
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000
        

</TABLE>
#### Clara Kaplan, Respondent, v. Roux Laboratories, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, alleged to have been caused by the application of appellants’ hair dye, order directing examination before trial further modified by granting the motion to strike out item 2 of the notice of examination before trial, and by changing the language of item 1 to read as follows: “As to whether or not a product described in the complaint as Roux Hair Dye was manufactured by appellants and distributed by them to the defendant Jeanie Terranova.” As thus modified the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs, the examination to proceed on five days’ notice. The plaintiff has made no showing of necessity for an examination that may reveal trade secrets, nor that the information cannot be obtained otherwise. *(Drake*v. *Eerrman,*261 N. Y. 414.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary-Subject to Change Central Valley Project - California

Monthly Diversions in AF 2023

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 

CANALS

Contra Costa 8628 4283 13661 16780 17675 16062 11367 17809 10306 14Delta-Mendota 233060 204326 251791 128763 222645 210372 249907 254815 233647 138Actual Fed Dos Amigos -1047 5145 5108 82774 139453 159891 197198 143268 90646 90Madera 44845 21571 31986 56538 67542 68722 73243 59483 41096 33Friant-Kern 45503 207786 89297 92028 145402 215735 283258 259930 223043 143Corning 0 0 91 230 964 1615 2033 1742 1327 Folsom-South 0 0 0 635 1708 1918 2690 2237 1789 1Tehama-Colusa 0 4268 668 11161 30925 46184 53687 35261 20458 11

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel 771 1325 1301 1614 1826 1869 1877 1688 1636 1

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek 0 0 0 2271 9065 10754 11977 11720 8494 5North Canal 0 0 0 639 2573 2945 3424 3582 2339 1South Canal 0 0 0 1632 6492 7809 8553 8138 6155 4

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal 3201 2906 3358 6934 18437 24677 29142 25686 17403 10NA = Not Available at time report was produced.