alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 11

- 00036

- CR
DAMOND JAVAR CASTLE , Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 08

- 05436

- CRF

- 85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Damond Javar Castle file d a notice of appeal regarding his April 15, 2010
conviction for aggravated kidnapping. T EX

. P ENAL C ODE A NN . 20.04 (Vernon 2003). By
letter dated February 15, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Castle that the appeal
was subject to dismissal because it appeared that the notice of appeal was untimely. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.2(a)(1). The Clerk also warned Castle that the appeal would be
dismissed unless, within 21 days of the date of this letter, a response was filed showing
grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 44.3.Castle v. State Page 2

This Court received notice that Castle timely filed a notice of appeal on May 10,
2010. At that time, this Court assigned Cause No. 10

- 10

- 00234

- CR to the appeal. That
appeal was transferred to the Eleventh Court of App eals in Eastland, Texas. Therefore,

the record from that cause number i s no longer before this Court.
On February 8, 2011, Castle filed a pro se notice of appeal in this Court for his
conviction that is pending on appeal in the Eleventh Court of Appeals. This Court does
not have jurisdiction to consider the appeal.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

AL SCOGGINS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed March 2 , 2011 Do not publish [CRPM]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 246

 244

 231

 219

 220

 224

 222

 219

 213

 214

 212

 210

 218

 218

 217

 226

 243

 251

 265

 249

 254

 257

 253

 243

 244

 248

 258

 245

 260

 257

 220

 225

 212

 194

 178

 182

 182

 187

 189

 175

 193

 196

 198

 200

 205

 210

 208

 210

 214

 216

 214

 215

 211

 210

 211

 210

 203

 202

 201

 197

 235

 232

 221

 204

 195

 195

 196

 197

 197

 196

 199

 201

 205

 208

 211

 216

 219

 225

 228

 224

 224

 228

 221

 219

 221

 221

 218

 216

 213

 214

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §454. Unlawful use of the American flag by vessel of foreign state

(a) It shall be unlawful for any vessel belonging to or operating under the jurisdiction of any foreign state to use the flag of the United States thereon, or to make use of any distinctive signs or markings, indicating that the same is an American vessel.

(b) Any vessel violating the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be denied for a period of three months the right to enter the ports or territorial waters of the United States except in cases of force majeure.

(Nov. 4, 1939, ch. 2, §14, 54 Stat. 11.)
================================================================================

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Theodore Tsagkaris,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of Tari Inc.,  for the fiscal  year ended  March 31, 2007
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tari Inc.

Date:  June 29, 2007

/s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

--------------------------------
Theodore Tsagkaris
President, C.E.O. and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-52;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports; 3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and 4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006   By: /s/ Ellen Z. LamaleName: Ellen Z. LamaleTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary
### §8725. Liability of parent companies for violations of sanctions by foreign subsidiaries

#### (a) Definitions

In this section:

#### (1) Entity

The term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, or other organization.

#### (2) Own or control

The term "own or control" means, with respect to an entity—

(A) to hold more than 50 percent of the equity interest by vote or value in the entity;

(B) to hold a majority of seats on the board of directors of the entity; or

(C) to otherwise control the actions, policies, or personnel decisions of the entity.

#### (b) Prohibition

Not later than 60 days after August 10, 2012, the President shall prohibit an entity owned or controlled by a United States person and established or maintained outside the United States from knowingly engaging in any transaction directly or indirectly with the Government of Iran or any person subject to the jurisdiction of the Government of Iran that would be prohibited by an order or regulation issued pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) if the transaction were engaged in by a United States person or in the United States.

#### (c) Civil penalty

The civil penalties provided for in section 206(b) of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1705(b)) shall apply to a United States person to the same extent that such penalties apply to a person that commits an unlawful act described in section 206(a) of that Act if an entity owned or controlled by the United States person and established or maintained outside the United States violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of any order or regulation issued to implement subsection (b).

#### (d) Applicability

Subsection (c) shall not apply with respect to a transaction described in subsection (b) by an entity owned or controlled by a United States person and established or maintained outside the United States if the United States person divests or terminates its business with the entity not later than the date that is 180 days after August 10, 2012.

(Pub. L. 112–158, title II, §218, Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1234.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 8785(a) of this title.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act, referred to in subsec. (b), is title II of Pub. L. 95–223, Dec. 28, 1977, 91 Stat. 1626, which is classified generally to chapter 35 (§1701 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1701 of Title 50 and Tables.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

In connection with the annual report of Celator Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending
December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                        
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 1, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Scott T. Jackson                                                                                   
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Scott T. Jackson,                                                                                      
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)                                                  
|                    |  |  | 
|Date: April 1, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Fred M. Powell                                                                                     
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Fred M. Powell, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)
### SUBCHAPTER V—MASSACHUSETTS INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT
§ 2.246 Petitions for amendment: Submission and form. ( a ) *Submission of petitions for amendment.* ( 1 ) A request for amendment of a record shall be submitted to the system manager for the system of records containing the record unless the system notice describing the system prescribes or permits submission to a different official or officials. If an individual wishes to request amendment of records located in more than one system, a separate petition must be submitted to each system manager.
( 2 ) A petition for amendment of a record may be submitted only if the individual submitting the petition has previously requested and been granted access to the record and has inspected or been given a copy of the record.
( b ) *Form of petition.* ( 1 ) A petition for amendment shall be in writing and shall specifically identify the record for which amendment is sought.
( 2 ) The petition shall state, in detail, the reasons why the petitioner believes the record, or the objectionable portion thereof, is not accurate, relevant, timely or complete. Copies of documents or evidence relied upon in support of these reasons shall be submitted with the petition.
( 3 ) The petition shall state, specifically and in detail, the changes sought in the record. If the changes involve rewriting the record or portions thereof or involve adding new language to the record, the petition shall propose specific language to implement the changes.
[48 FR 56585, Dec. 22, 1983]
Table 26

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary Data Subject to Change San Luis and Cross Valley Canals

2017

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

SAN LUIS CANAL

City of Avenal 133 105 145 147 187 211 237 231 199 175 148 151 2,069

City of Coalinga 229 162 222 259 520 670 1,177 1,416 795 751 453 603 7,257

City of Dos Palos 60 60 61 88 142 157 179 167 141 122 83 78 1,338

City of Huron 40 36 57 65 71 77 97 96 84 68 58 52 801

Pacheco WD 0 0 20 19 614 1,106 2,205 1,522 857 576 295 219 7,433

Pacheco CCID Non-project (Hamburg) 0 85 585 111 61 563 0 0 0 140 11 0 1,556

Panoche WD 254 662 2,649 2,636 4,923 5,423 4,937 3,545 1,430 1,545 885 550 29,439

San Luis WD 131 822 3,512 5,614 9,220 11,365 11,113 6,097 5,031 5,330 2,504 760 61,499

Westlands WD 5,186 27,158 39,712 72,860 131,812 162,522 161,852 121,795 69,318 56,008 37,470 39,720 925,413

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 4) 0 0 0 0 0 60 32 0 0 0 0 0 92

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kern National Wildlife Refuge (USFWS) 2,395 1,443 0 0 2,559 0 0 2,766 5,754 6,042 4,829 3,233 29,021

0

Total 8,428 30,533 46,963 81,799 150,109 182,154 181,829 137,635 83,609 70,757 46,736 45,366 1,065,918

O'NEILL FOREBAY DELIVERIES

O'Neill Forebay Wildlife 7 0 8 5 69 98 97 97 84 91 50 60 666

San Luis WD Ag 8 12 372 506 716 842 730 375 639 384 72 78 4,734

San Luis M&I 17 13 20 26 47 52 67 55 58 52 44 39 490

VA Cemetery 1 1 10 23 71 80 94 80 59 37 7 9 472

Total 33 26 410 560 903 1,072 988 607 840 564 173 186 6,362

CROSS VALLEY CANAL (See Notes 1 below)

County of Fresno 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

County of Tulare (See Note 2 below) 0 0 0 0 0 445 0 0 0 0 0 0 445

Lower Tule River ID (See Note 4 below) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 1,449 0 1,555

Pixley ID (See Note 4 below) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 1,449 0 1,555

Kern-Tulare WD (See Note 3 below) 0 0 0 0 0 3,425 12,575 0 0 179 4,557 13,014 33,750

Hills-Valley ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tri-Valley ID (See Note 2 below) 0 0 0 0 32 172 96 0 0 0 0 0 300

Total 0 0 0 0 32 4,042 12,671 0 0 391 7,455 13,014 37,605

SAN FELIPE DIVISION

Santa Clara (including Casa De Fruta) 5,837 5,163 6,211 7,876 5,237 12,159 10,759 10,131 6,441 1,130 0 0 70,944

San Benito 1,566 2,017 1,760 7 848 12,085 3,470 5,837 4,528 147 0 0 32,265

Total 7,403 7,180 7,971 7,883 6,085 24,244 14,229 15,968 10,969 1,277 0 0 103,209

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.

Note 1: Cross Valley Canal section represents delivereis on behalf of the contractors listed, not necessarily what flows went into the Cross Valley Canal.

Note 2: May, Jun & Jul 2017 deliveries provided out of Millerton Lake.

Note 3: Jun, Jul, Oct, Nov & Dec delivery of water transferred in from another CVP Contractor.

Note 4: Oct & Nov delivery of 2016 CVC Carryover (forfited like amount of 2017 CVC Supply)
### §2521. Foreign language proficiency

No person shall be assigned to duty as a volunteer under this chapter in any foreign country or area unless at the time of such assignment he possesses such reasonable proficiency as his assignment requires in speaking the language of the country or area to which he is assigned.

(Pub. L. 87–293, title I, §24, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 624.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 87–293, Sept. 22, 1961, 75 Stat. 612, known as the Peace Corps Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2501 of this title and Tables.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

December-10

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Pumpin

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 5,507 4,088 9,595 

2-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 5,686 4,108 9,794 3-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,231 4,095 10,326 4-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,060 4,109 10,170 5-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 5,969 4,102 10,072 6-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 5,981 4,105 10,086 7-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,088 4,118 10,207 8-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,369 4,120 10,489 9-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,369 4,135 10,504 

10-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,369 4,103 10,472 11-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,334 4,136 10,470 12-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,369 4,139 10,508 13-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,363 4,134 10,497 14-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,369 4,092 10,460 15-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,293 4,103 10,396 

16-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,369 4,124 10,492 

17-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 6,336 4,102 10,438 

18-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 4000 00003 5,762 4,072 9,834 

19-Dec-10 0200 0 2 0 6010 00104 6,369 4,069 10,437 20-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 6,243 4,141 10,384 

21-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 6,369 4,003 10,372 

22-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 6,965 3,797 10,762 23-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 7,433 3,788 11,222 

24-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 7,973 3,777 11,749 

25-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 8,571 3,775 12,346 

26-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 8,571 3,775 12,346 

27-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 8,527 4,131 12,658 28-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 8,571 4,153 12,723 

29-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 8,571 407 8,978 

30-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 8,571 4,050 12,621 31-Dec-10 0000 0 0 0 6000 00004 8,571 4,055 12,626 

Total 0200 0 2 0 6010 00104 212,124 121,908 334,032 4

Banks Tracy Combined B
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7142** 

JUAN CARLOS OCON

- PARADA, a/k/a Juan Carlos Ocan

- Parada , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. S. K. YOUNG, Warden , Respondent

– Appellee
.

Appeal from the United State s District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate Judge. ( 3:09

- cv - 00087

- MHL )

Submitted : October 18, 2010 Decided: October 2 5 , 2010

Before WILKINSON and DAVIS , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Cir cuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Juan Carlos Ocon

- Parada, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Theresa Armstrong, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding preced ent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Juan Car los Ocon

- Parada seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appeal ability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ocon

- Parada has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the fact s and legal contentions are adequately presented in the3 materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, LORILLARDTOBACCO COMPANY, COMMONWEALTHBRANDS, INC., LIGGETT GROUP LLC, and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., Plaintiffs,



### v. UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### ) Civil Case No. 11-1482 (RJL) ) ) ) ) 

### MARGARET HAMBURG, Commissioner of ) the United States Food and ) DrugAdministration, and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary ofthe United States DepartmentofHealth and Human Services, Defendants. 

# -tLORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )



### November!1-, 2011 [Dkt. #11]**~** 

### Forthe reasons set forth in the accompanying Opinion, it is this

# t day of November, 2011 hereby

### ORDERED that Plaintiffs' MotionFor Preliminary Injunction [Dkt. #11] is GRANTED; and it is further 

### ORDERED that implementation ofthe graphic image and textual warning requirements published at 76 Fed. Reg. 36,628 (June 22, 2011) and mandated by Section 201(a) ofthe Tobacco Control Act, and all related requirements, see Act §§ 101(b), 301,

are stayed until 15 months after a final ruling from this Court on the merits ofthe parties' claims; and it is further 

### ORDERED that the FDA, as a consequence ofthis Order, shall be enjoined from enforcing any ofthe new requirements contained in its Final Rule until 15 months after a final ruling by this Court. 

### SO ORDERED.

United States DistrictJudge



### 2