alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 829.35

 829.87

 830.94

 831.50

 831.98

 832.04

 832.00

 831.88

 831.60

 831.23

 830.76

 830.26

 830.31

 830.35

 830.35

 830.29

 830.23

 830.15

 830.05

 830.07

 830.07

 830.19

 830.57

 831.00

 831.40

 831.79

 832.28

 834.28

 36.50

 37.06

 38.25

 38.87

 39.41

 39.48

 39.44

 39.30

 38.99

 38.57

 38.05

 37.49

 37.55

 37.59

 37.59

 37.53

 37.46

 37.37

 37.26

 37.28

 37.28

 37.41

 37.84

 38.31

 38.76

 39.20

 39.76

 42.07

STORAGE

+0.15

+0.57

+1.18

+0.63

+0.54

+0.07

-0.05

-0.14

-0.32

-0.42

-0.53

-0.55

+0.06

+0.04

+0.00

-0.07

-0.07

-0.09

-0.11

+0.02

+0.00

+0.13

+0.42

+0.48

+0.45

+0.44

+0.56

+2.32

CHANGE

736

945

1,259

984

943

702

646

602

509

458

400

389

373

365

345

311

310

297

285

280

260

250

296

289

276

254

311

1,796

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 0

SPILL

 638

 640

 643

 645

 648

 646

 648

 648

 646

 645

 643

 646

 321

 321

 321

 321

 321

 321

 320

 248

 238

 160

 60

 26

 26

 11

 11

 628

OUTLET

 1

 0

 0

 2

 3

 2

 1

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 4

 2

 4

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 3

 4

 3

 3

 2

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .05

 .07

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .06

 .08

 .07

 .06

 .11

 .07

 .10

 .08

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .08

 .10

 .09

 .07

 .06

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 .02

 .20

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.06

 1.08

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

FEBRUARY 2006 RUN DATE: 07/17/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +5.71 14,871 11,390 540 55 1.52 2.40

ACRE-FEET +5,710 29,497 22,592 1,071 109

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,071

OUTLET

TOTAL

 22,592

 23,663

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.40

JULY 1, 2005 17.35

 36.34

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                            1,327,454
<SECURITIES>                      2,058,551
<RECEIVABLES>                       721,980
<ALLOWANCES>                         27,210
<INVENTORY>                       2,629,184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  7,040,740
<PP&E>                              714,201
<DEPRECIATION>                      512,887
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    7,362,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               627,270
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             31,486
<OTHER-SE>                        6,704,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      7,362,756
<SALES>                           1,760,526
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  1,760,526
<CGS>                               845,255
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     1,419,462
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (30,559)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     371,623
<INCOME-TAX>                        150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 221,623
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                        221,623
<EPS-BASIC>                           .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .06



</TABLE>
#### § 625.7 Disaster Unemployment Assistance: Duration.

DUA shall be payable to an eligible unemployed worker or eligible unemployed self-employed individual for all weeks of unemployment which begin during a Disaster Assistance Period.
#### Dorothy Harper, Appellant, *v.*Fredonia Seed Company, Inc., Respondent. Blanche Carlson, Appellant, *v.*Fredonia Seed Company, Inc., Respondent. Winifred Droege, Appellant, *v.*Fredonia Seed Company, Inc., Respondent.

Fourth Department,

May 4, 1949.

*245
      *Murle L. Rowe*for appellants.

*Glenn W. Woodin*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, §§ 201-219) did not prohibit contracts between employers and employees as to hours and wages so long as the hourly wage was not less than the minimum therein specified and so long as the employee received compensation ££ at a rate not less than one and one-half times the regular rate at which he is employed ” (§ 207, subd. [a], par. [3]) for overtime work. Such contracts were entered into between the parties here. These contracts reduced the monthly wage to a weekly basis and provided that such wage covered payment for the statutory work week, plus overtime payment for hours in excess of the statutory work week. The record discloses that these contracts were entered into fairly and without misrepresentation, fraud or compulsion. The statute did not require that wages be increased and they were not at any time decreased. In fact, from time to time, they were increased. The statute does not define ££ regular rate ’ ’ *246and the “ regular rate ” was not directly stated in the contracts. The fact that it was not so stated did not render the wage plan invalid where there was a formula providing for the ascertainment of the “ regular rate ”. *(Watkins*v. *Hudson Coal Co.,*54 F. Supp. 953; *149 Madison Ave. Corp.*v. *Asselta,*331 U. S. 199, 204.) Here the weekly wage was stated and the hours of work were definite and invariable. The formula, therefore, consisted in a mathematical computation. It was a mere matter of arithmetic to ascertain the “ regular rate ”. This was arrived at by dividing the weekly wage by the sum of the number of hours of the statutory work week plus one and one-half times the excess hours. The quotient gave the *“*regular rate ”. The record shows that the appellants were paid in full for the statutory hours at the “ regular rate ” and for the excess hours at one and one-half times the “ regular rate ”, There was no violation of the statute and the right of employers and employees to agree upon a formula for ascertainment of the *“*regular rate ” was sustained in *Walling*v. *Belo Corp.*(316 U. S. 624) and in *Walling*v. *Halliburton Co.*(331 U. S. 17).

The judgments should be affirmed, with costs.

All concur. Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ.

In each case: Judgment affirmed, with costs.
### §1331. Approval

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if any application made by an Indian, Indian tribe, Indian council, or any band or group of Indians under any law requiring the approval of the Secretary of the Interior or the Commissioner of Indian Affairs of contracts or agreements relating to the employment of legal counsel (including the choice of counsel and the fixing of fees) by any such Indians, tribe, council, band, or group is neither granted nor denied within ninety days following the making of such application, such approval shall be deemed to have been granted.

(Pub. L. 90–284, title VI, §601, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 80.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernarde COTTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10773.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Vernarde Cotton, Glenville, WV, pro se.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Vernarde Cotton, federal prisoner # 17971-077, appeals the denial of his Fed. R.Crim.P. 35 motion challenging the 30-year probation-revocation sentence imposed pursuant to his bank robbery conviction. He argues pursuant to *Benson v. United States,*332 F.2d 288 (5th Cir.1964), that the district court illegally imposed a “general sentence” in his multi-count conviction.

The record, however, discloses that the 30-year aggregate sentence was not a “general sentence.” As was announced in open court on June 10, 1988, the district court ran the 20-year term imposed on count three consecutively with the 10-year term imposed on count two. The district court’s denial of Rule 35 relief was therefore neither illegal nor a “gross abuse of discretion.” *United States v. Sinclair,*1 F.3d 329, 330 (5th Cir.1993) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Cotton’s appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore dismissed as frivolous. *See Howard v. King,*707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir.1983). Cotton is cautioned that future frivolous challenges to his sentence will result in the imposition of sanctions.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.462 Withdrawal of a CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification. ( a ) The employer may withdraw a *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* after it has been submitted to the NPC for processing, including after the CO grants certification under § 655.450. However, the employer is still obligated to comply with the terms and conditions of employment contained in the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and work contract with respect to all workers recruited and hired in connection with that application.
( b ) To request withdrawal, the employer must submit a request in writing to the NPC identifying the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and stating the reason(s) for the withdrawal.
### §1114. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–659, §4, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 909, which related to membership roll of Miami Indians of Oklahoma, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1244317
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5447430
<ALLOWANCES>                                    175000
<INVENTORY>                                   10626792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              19922085
<PP&E>                                         4724724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1924673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40856739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3514736
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        297285
<OTHER-SE>                                    31635480
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40856739
<SALES>                                       12300307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12985559
<CGS>                                          6512980
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6512980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5865370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              176128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 472728
<INCOME-TAX>                                    307182
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             165546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    165546
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
#### § 801.104 Operational rules.

The Deputy Secretary of Labor may promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary or appropriate for effective operation of the Benefits Review Board as an independent quasi-judicial body in accordance with the provisions of the statute.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 827.64

 827.58

 827.58

 827.56

 827.52

 827.49

 827.45

 827.41

 827.41

 827.43

 827.52

 827.72

 828.53

 829.14

 830.02

 830.73

 831.14

 831.37

 831.52

 831.64

 831.74

 832.13

 831.97

 831.57

 831.08

 830.56

 831.50

 832.00

 832.00

 831.75

 831.40

 34.67

 34.60

 34.60

 34.58

 34.54

 34.51

 34.47

 34.42

 34.42

 34.44

 34.54

 34.75

 35.61

 36.27

 37.23

 38.01

 38.47

 38.73

 38.90

 39.03

 39.14

 39.59

 39.40

 38.95

 38.40

 37.82

 38.87

 39.44

 39.44

 39.16

 38.76

STORAGE

-0.13

-0.06

+0.00

-0.02

-0.04

-0.03

-0.04

-0.04

+0.00

+0.02

+0.10

+0.21

+0.86

+0.66

+0.96

+0.79

+0.46

+0.26

+0.17

+0.14

+0.11

+0.44

-0.18

-0.45

-0.55

-0.58

+1.05

+0.56

+0.00

-0.28

-0.39

CHANGE

-23

10

43

30

20

25

20

20

41

52

88

147

474

368

523

435

270

170

125

108

96

260

236

102

51

37

865

623

340

196

138

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 18

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 310

 309

 309

 308

 316

 317

 317

 317

 316

OUTLET

 1

 2

 3

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 3

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .02

 .05

 .08

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .04

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .07

 .03

 .06

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .07

 .03

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .46

 .16

 .05

 .75

 .20

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .52

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 1.50

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

DECEMBER 2006 RUN DATE: 04/11/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4.00 5,890 3,239 618 35 1.02 3.82

ACRE-FEET +4,000 11,683 6,425 1,226 69

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,226

OUTLET

TOTAL

 6,425

 7,651

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.82

JULY 1, 2006 5.19

 34.79

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.322 Assurance of compliance and recipient assessment of age distinctions. ( a ) Each recipient of Federal financial assistance from DOI shall sign a written assurance as specified by DOI that it will comply with the Act and these regulations.
( b ) *Recipient assessment of age distinctions.* ( 1 ) As part of a compliance review under § 17.330 or complaint investigation under § 17.331, DOI may require a recipient employing the equivalent of 15 or more employees to complete a written self-evaluation, in a manner specified by the responsible Department official, of any age distinction imposed in its program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from DOI to assess the recipient's compliance with the Act.
( 2 ) Whenever an assessment indicates a violation of the Act and the DOI regulations, the recipient shall take corrective action.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RAFAEL BURGOS

- VAZQUEZ and JUAN GOMEZ
,

Appellant s ,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, National Association, as s uccessor to

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK ,

Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 2210

[ March 23, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Lynn Rosenthal , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE08034579 (11)

.

Rafael Burgos

- Vazquez and Juan Gomez , Hollywood, pro se.

W. Aaron Daniel and Elliot B. Kula of Kula & Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Appellants Juan Gomez, the sole defendant in the underlying

foreclosure case , and Rafael Burgos

- Vazquez, who has joined in the appeal despite not having been a party to the underlying action, claim to challenge

an order rendered on May 7, 2015, denying Mr. Gomez’s motion to cancel

the foreclosure sale

. This order itself is non

- final and non

- appealable.

Moreover , t he initial brief on appeal raises issues solely addressed to the final judgment of foreclosure entered on January 5, 2009 . This appeal is untimely from the final judgment. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). We therefore dismiss this appeal.

C IKLIN
, C.J., W ARNER and G ERBER
, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended  September 30, 1996 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                        3,359,834
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                41,259,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                    404,675
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             46,166,403
<PP&E>                                        6,409,803
<DEPRECIATION>                                2,870,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               57,929,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        15,213,319
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         51,078
<OTHER-SE>                                   13,370,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 57,929,417
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            103,393,302
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                97,386,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (18,954)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,563,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               4,461,837
<INCOME-TAX>                                  1,695,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           2,766,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  2,766,837
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.85
        

</TABLE>
Innovators

I.ASKO

in Home Comfort

April 8, 2009

Ms. Brenda Edwards

Office of EERE

Mail Stop EE2J

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

RE: Request for information regarding possible standby and off mode energy use for

un vented heaters

Dear Ms. Edwards:

I would like to thank you for the opportunity to present our response to your letter of March 23,

2009. Respectfully we have submilled our answers through our membership with AHAM. You

should have received a document through Ms. Debra Brunk of AHAM dated 4/8/2009.

Sincerely,

2~cn~ SCOll Mohler

Lasko Products, Inc

Compliance Manager

NSM/ris

820 Lincoln Avenue

West Chesler, Pa 19:180
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                          50,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  246,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    184,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               499,900
<PP&E>                                       1,400,200
<DEPRECIATION>                               (245,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,832,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          610,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           300
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,832,000
<SALES>                                        598,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               598,500
<CGS>                                          493,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  493,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 1,020

 954

 958

 875

 694

 622

 666

 753

 788

 733

 757

 815

 712

 763

 791

 830

 819

 821

 717

 680

 657

 647

 827

 903

 955

 1,001

 1,133

 1,067

 1,047

 1,059

 898

 248

 253

 230

 251

 218

 250

 215

 233

 227

 241

 240

 236

 266

 264

 271

 240

 259

 276

 255

 255

 258

 227

 307

 284

 278

 287

 310

 270

 315

 258

 289

 552

 537

 532

 542

 500

 467

 434

 454

 456

 464

 490

 521

 491

 494

 511

 524

 523

 531

 531

 513

 498

 493

 520

 540

 558

 596

 635

 617

 598

 609

 586

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Water quality in the upperFloridan aquifer and overlying surficial aquifers, Southeastern United States,1993-2010**
 
Report | Appendix 2| Data archive
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.4/2:1355
Item Number:0620-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:
 
October 23, 2017