alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
32.1**
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C.
§ 1350,
  AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Howard F. Hill, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:
  (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 Date:
      June 14, 2005
    /s/
      Howard F. Hill
      Howard
      F. Hill
      Chief
      Executive Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to RF Industries, Ltd. and will be retained by RF
Industries, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### William S. Everts, Respondent, v. George Everts, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

All concur.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Archibald C. W. Cooper, Deceased. Raymond Herke, as Executor of Archibald C. W. Cooper, Deceased, Appellant; Ann A. Cooper, Respondent.

Decree of the Richmond County Surrogate’s Court, dismissing appellant’s petition and denying probate to a propounded will, reversed on the law and the facts and the matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court with directions to admit the will to probate in accordance herewith, with costs to appellant, payable out of the estate. In our opinion the will offered for probate, carrying out the same general testamentary scheme as the will executed by testator eight years earlier, together with the testimony of the three attesting witnesses, established testator’s testamentary capacity, which was not overcome by the proof adduced by contestant. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
§ 1810.3 Effect of laches; authority to bind government. ( a ) The authority of the United States to enforce a public right or protect a public interest is not vitiated or lost by acquiescence of its officers or agents, or by their laches, neglect of duty, failure to act, or delays in the performance of their duties.
( b ) The United States is not bound or estopped by the acts of its officers or agents when they enter into an arrangement or agreement to do or cause to be done what the law does not sanction or permit.
( c ) Reliance upon information or opinion of any officer, agent or employee or on records maintained by land offices cannot operate to vest any right not authorized by law.
§ 666.120 What are the procedures for negotiating annual levels of performance? ( a ) We issue instructions on the specific information that must accompany the State Plan and that is used to review the State's expected levels of performance. The instructions may require that levels of performance for years two and three be expressed as a percentage improvement over the immediately preceding year's performance, consistent with the objective of continuous improvement.
( b ) States must submit expected levels of performance for the required indicators for each of the first three program years covered by the Plan.
( c ) The Secretary and the Governor must reach agreement on levels of performance for each core indicator and the customer satisfaction indicators. In negotiating these levels, the following must be taken into account: ( 1 ) The expected levels of performance identified in the State Plan;
( 2 ) The extent to which the levels of performance for each core indicator assist in achieving high customer satisfaction;
( 3 ) The extent to which the levels of performance promote continuous improvement and ensure optimal return on the investment of Federal funds; and
( 4 ) How the levels compare with those of other States, taking into account factors including differences in economic conditions, participant characteristics, and the proposed service mix and strategies.
( d ) The levels of performance agreed to under paragraph (c) of this section will be the State's negotiated levels of performance for the first three years of the State Plan. These levels will be used to determine whether sanctions will be applied or incentive grant funds will be awarded.
( e ) Before the fourth year of the State Plan, the Secretary and the Governor must reach agreement on levels of performance for each core indicator and the customer satisfaction indicators for the fourth and fifth years covered by the plan. In negotiating these levels, the factors listed in paragraph (c) of this section must be taken into account.
( f ) The levels of performance agreed to under paragraph (e) of this section will be the State negotiated levels of performance for the fourth and fifth years of the plan and must be incorporated into the State Plan.
( g ) Levels of performance for the additional indicators developed by the Governor, including additional indicators to demonstrate and measure continuous improvement toward goals identified by the State, are not part of the negotiations described in paragraphs (c) and (e) of this section. (WIA sec. 136(b)(3).)
( h ) State negotiated levels of performance may be revised in accordance with § 666.130.
**1400 Independence A venue, SW.**  **Room 1510**  **- S**  **Washington, DC 20250 -**  **0242** Subject: Phone and mail exchanges between the Organic Trade Association and the

Agricultural Marketing Service Date: January

14, 2015 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is posting the following supplementary information for the record. In connection with the Federal Register Notice published December 16, 2014 (79 FR 75006), Mrs. Michelle Sh arrow, Rulemaking Branch Chief, of the Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, received a phone call on December 18 from Ms. Marni Karlin , Vice P resident of Government Affairs, General Counsel , of the Organic Trade Association (OTA). Ms. Karlin asked Mrs. Sharrow clarifying questions regarding the Civil Justice Reform analysis in this Federal Register Notice

. Following this phone conversation an email exchange ensued. AMS is plac ing the incoming question s and re sponse s on the record. The email exchanges between AMS and the OTA, dated December 18 and 22 , contain clarifying questions from the OTA and AMS’s response thereto. These emails are submitted to the record as an attachment to this memo.
### §1682. Subrogation of claims by Indian Health Service

On and after October 18, 1986, the Indian Health Service may seek subrogation of claims including but not limited to auto accident claims, including no-fault claims, personal injury, disease, or disability claims, and worker's compensation claims, the proceeds of which shall be credited to the funds established by sections 401 and 402 1 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act.

(Pub. L. 99–500, §101(h) [title II], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783–242, 1783–277, and Pub. L. 99–591, §101(h) [title II], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341–242, 3341–277.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 401 and 402 of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, referred to in text, probably means former sections 401 and 402 of Pub. L. 94–437, title IV, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1408, 1409, which enacted sections 1395qq and 1396j of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, amended sections 1395f, 1395n, and 1396d of Title 42, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 1395qq and 1396j of Title 42. Sections 401 and 402 of the Act were amended generally by section 401(a), (b)(1) of Pub. L. 102–573, title IV, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4565, and by section 10221(a) of Pub. L. 111–148, title X, Mar. 23, 2010, 124 Stat. 935, and are classified to sections 1641 and 1642 of this title, respectively.

#### Codification

Pub. L. 99–591 is a corrected version of Pub. L. 99–500.

Section was enacted as part of the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1987, as enacted by Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591, and not as part of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act which comprises this chapter.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 1682, Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(c) [title II], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1837, 1865, which related to subrogation of claims by Indian Health Service, was omitted as superseded by section 101(h) [title II] of Pub. L. 99–500 and Pub. L. 99–591.

1 See References in Text note below.
§ 1864.0-2 Objectives. ( a ) The objective of the disclaimer is to eliminate the necessity for court action or private legislation in those instances where the United States asserts no ownership or record interest, based upon a determination by the Secretary of the Interior that there is a cloud on the title to the lands, attributable to the United States, and that: ( 1 ) A record interest of the United States in lands has terminated by operation of law or is otherwise invalid; or
( 2 ) The lands lying between the meander line shown on a plat of survey approved by the Bureau of Land Management or its predecessors and the actual shoreline of a body of water are not lands of the United States; or
( 3 ) Accreted, relicted, or avulsed lands are not lands of the United States.
( b ) A disclaimer has the same effect as a quitclaim deed in that it operates to estop the United States from asserting a claim to an interest in or the ownership of lands that are being disclaimed. However, a disclaimer does not grant, convey, transfer, remise, quitclaim, release or renounce any title or interest in lands, nor does it operate to release or discharge any tax, judgement or other lien, or any other mortgage, deed or trust or other security interest in lands that are held by or for the benefit of the United States or any instrumentality of the United States.
( c ) The regulations in this subpart do not apply to any disclaimer, release, quitclaim or other similar instrument or declaration, that may be issued pursuant to any provision of law other than section 315 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1745).
### Part B—Self-Determined Housing Activities for Tribal Communities
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.7

                             COMSHARE, INCORPORATED

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
constitutes and appoints Dennis G. Ganster, Kathryn A. Jehle and Michael S.
Khoury, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution, and resubstitution for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign a certain Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to be filed by Comshare, Incorporated relating to the Comshare,
Incorporated Directors' Stock Option Plan and any and all amendments thereto,
and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Dated: 12/14, 1999             /s/ John F. Rockart
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John F. Rockart, Director
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of NewPage Holding Corporation



|                                    |  |                                                             
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                    | 
|NewPage Corporation                 |  | Delaware                                                    
|                                    | 
|Subsidiaries of NewPage Corporation |  |                                                             
|                                    | 
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                    | 
|Chillicothe Paper Inc.              |  | Delaware                                                    
|Consolidated Water Power Company    |  | Wisconsin                                                   
|Escanaba Paper Company              |  | Michigan                                                    
|Luke Paper Company                  |  | Delaware                                                    
|NewPage Canadian Sales, LLC         |  | Delaware                                                    
|NewPage Consolidated Papers Inc.    |  | Delaware                                                    
|NewPage Energy Services LLC         |  | Delaware                                                    
|NewPage Port Hawkesbury Corp.       |  | Nova Scotia, Canada                                         
|NewPage Port Hawkesbury Holding LLC |  | Delaware                                                    
|NewPage Wisconsin System Inc.       |  | Wisconsin                                                   
|Rumford Cogeneration, Inc.          |  | Delaware                                                    
|Rumford Falls Power Company         |  | Maine                                                       
|Rumford Paper Company               |  | Delaware                                                    
|Upland Resources, Inc.              |  | West Virginia                                               
|Wickliffe Paper Company LLC         |  | Delaware
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Inocencio HERRERA-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40645.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Inocencio Herrera-Perez (Herrera) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found unlawfully in the United States after previously being deported. Herrera argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional.

*294Herrera’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Herrera contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Herrera properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.91

 130.72

 130.63

 130.48

 130.65

 130.71

 130.76

 130.59

 130.66

 130.65

 130.78

 130.92

 130.72

 130.50

 130.48

 130.51

 130.14

 130.48

 130.88

 130.55

 130.43

 130.61

 130.78

 130.81

 130.96

 131.02

 131.07

 131.13

 130.74

 130.69

 679

 658

 648

 631

 650

 657

 663

 643

 651

 650

 665

 680

 658

 633

 631

 634

 595

 631

 676

 639

 626

 645

 665

 668

 685

 692

 698

 706

 660

 655

STORAGE

+3

-21

-10

-17

+19

+7

+6

-20

+8

-1

+15

+15

-22

-25

-2

+3

-39

+36

+45

-37

-13

+19

+20

+3

+17

+7

+6

+8

-46

-5

CHANGE

289

275

287

293

317

274

209

186

189

199

242

280

310

337

361

367

363

412

431

381

318

288

288

330

377

406

454

462

440

490

INFLOW

 57

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

PUTAH

 229

 239

 245

 256

 260

 223

 160

 150

 139

 153

 187

 225

 274

 304

 315

 319

 336

 347

 361

 354

 279

 232

 232

 281

 321

 355

 404

 411

 416

 446

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .20

 .22

 .17

 .13

 .14

 .23

 .04

 .13

 .04

 .23

 .22

 .16

 .20

 .08

 .14

 .13

 .18

 .14

 .18

 .12

 .03

 .13

 .13

 .14

 .20

 .24

 .26

 .26

 .17

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .12

 .03

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .36

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 RUN DATE: 05/16/2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -21 9,855 8,453 1,391 20 4.85 .62

ACRE-FEET -21 19,547 16,767 2,759 40

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,759

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 16,767

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .62

JULY 1, 2000 19.23

 676

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 99


          PARRIN PROMOTED TO C.F.O. OF DAIN RAUSCHER, SUCCEEDING APPEL


MINNEAPOLIS (Nov. 18, 1999) - Dain Rauscher Corporation (NYSE: DRC), a
full-service brokerage and investment banking firm, has promoted DAVID J. PARRIN
to executive vice president and chief financial officer, effective on Jan. 1,
2000. Formerly senior vice president and controller, Parrin is to succeed JOHN
C. APPEL, vice chairman, who becomes president of the company's fixed income
capital markets group on Jan. 1, as previously announced.

     As CFO, Parrin will be responsible for treasury, accounting,
regulatory/credit, audit, corporate services and other finance and
administrative functions. The company will conduct a search for a controller to
succeed Parrin.

     "Dave is a strong leader, decision maker and developer of other people,"
said Appel. "His strong financial background and general business knowledge have
been invaluable these past 18 months as we have reshaped our business for the
future."

     Parrin, 44, joined Dain Rauscher in 1998 from U.S. Bancorp, where he had
served for four years as controller, responsible for its financial accounting,
tax and financial reporting functions. Before that he was an audit partner at
Ernst & Young, having worked with the firm's financial services industry team
for 17 years. A certified public accountant, Parrin has a bachelor's degree in
accountancy from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is a member
of the Minnesota Society of CPAs and the American Institute of CPAs. In the
community, Parrin serves on the executive committee of the Children's Theatre
Company board of governors.

     Dain Rauscher Corporation, one of the nation's largest full-service
securities firms, has 1,200 investment executives and 3,700 employees. The
company's broker-dealer, Dain Rauscher Incorporated, is now celebrating its 90th
year. It serves individual investors and small business owners predominantly in
the





<PAGE>   2


western half of the United States, and capital markets and correspondent clients
in select markets throughout the nation. Dain Rauscher Incorporated is a member
of the New York Stock Exchange and other major securities exchanges, as well as
the Securities Investor Protection Corp. The company's common stock trades on
the NYSE under the symbol DRC. Its headquarters are at Dain Rauscher Plaza, 60
S. Sixth St., Minneapolis, MN 55402-4422.

                                       ###


CONTACT:  Jennifer Driscoll, (612) 373-1647, or jdriscoll@dainrauscher.com

For biographies of the company's top executives and board of directors or for a
copy of the news release about John Appel's new role in fixed income, visit
www.dainrauscher.com/ir.

                                      # # #


CONTACT: Jennifer Driscoll, (612) 373-1647, or jdriscoll@dainrauscher.com
[Graphic Omitted] Ahold

                                                                   Press Release


                                                                     Royal Ahold
                                                       Corporate Communications




                                                        Date:  February 20, 2004
                                        For more information:  +31 75 659 57 20







Jan Andreae takes initiative to step down

Zaandam, The Netherlands, February 20, 2004 - Jan Andreae, member of the
Executive Board of Royal Ahold, has decided on his own initiative to withdraw
from the Executive Board.

Jan Andreae will take charge of special projects for the benefit of the Ahold
group, including the divestment of the Spanish operations.


Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.57.20






















                                                  Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                  P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                  The Netherlands
                                                  Phone: +31 (0)75 659 5720
http://www.ahold.com                              Fax:   +31 (0)75 659 8302
Exhibit 9.3



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                          -----------------------------


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-85168, 333-09292, 333-74321, 333-124983 and 333-124997)
and on Form F-3 and Form F-3/A (File No. 333-86288) of Stolt Offshore S.A. (a
Luxembourg company) and its subsidiaries ("Stolt") of our report dated June 10,
2005, with respect to the financial statements of NKT Flexibles I/S as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2004, prepared in accordance with the Danish
Financial Statements Act, as presented on pages 8-22 of NKT Flexibles I/Ss
Annual Report and note 14 to the financial statements of NKT Flexibles I/S,
which report appears in Amendment No.1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of
Stolt for the year ended November 30, 2004.




Copenhagen, June 29, 2005
KPMG C.Jespersen
Statsautoriseret Revisionsinteressentskab


/s/ Lars Andersen
Lars Andersen
State Authorised Public Accountant