alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Press Release

Changes in senior
IT-management
Ahold

Zaandam, The Netherlands, September 15, 2005 - Ahold today announced that
it has appointed Dave McNally as Chief Information Officer, effective
September 2005 to lead the company in the next phase of its information
management strategy.

In his new role, Dave will advise the Ahold Corporate Executive Board and
senior business executives on the strategic role and adoption of
information technology throughout the organization. He was previously
Chief Information Officer for Ahold's U.S. Foodservice business. Dave
succeeds Alex Gibbons who has decided to leave the company for personal
reasons.

Arthur Brouwer, Chief Business Support Officer, commented: "I would like
to welcome Dave to his new role. Since joining U.S. Foodservice, Dave has
proven his ability to partner with the business and to develop practical
solutions which address both short-term issues and long-term needs. I'm
confident he will apply this expertise to help us move towards one Ahold
IT strategy and portfolio of applications. "I would like to thank Alex for
his contribution in our effort to leverage our scale and support the
business better by moving towards one global information management
platform."


                                                                         2005033
Ahold Communications: +31 (0)75 659 5720




Disclaimer
Certain statements in this press release are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. These
forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
Many of these risks and uncertainties relate to factors that are beyond
our ability to control or estimate precisely. Many of these risk factors
are detailed in Ahold's publicly filed reports. Readers are cautioned not
to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date of this press release. We do not undertake any
obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press
release, except as may be required by applicable securities laws. Outside
The Netherlands, Koninklijke Ahold N.V., being its registered name,
presents itself under the name of "Royal Ahold" or simply "Ahold."


Ahold [graphic omitted]

     www.ahold.com
                                   Page 1 of 1
### §1300i–9. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–580, §10, Oct. 31, 1988, 102 Stat. 2934, which related to establishment of a plan for economic development for the Yurok Tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4599 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 12, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to permit certain 

partial fillings of prescriptions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4599 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Unused 

3 Medications Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PARTIAL FILLS OF SCHEDULE II CONTROLLED SUB5 STANCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 309 of the Controlled 

7 Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 829) is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(f) PARTIAL FILLS OF SCHEDULE II CONTROLLED

10 SUBSTANCES.— 

11 ‘‘(1) PARTIAL FILLS.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A prescription for a 

13 controlled substance in schedule II may be par14 tially filled if— 

15 ‘‘(i) it is not prohibited by State law; 

16 ‘‘(ii) the prescription is written and 

17 filled in accordance with the Controlled 

18 Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 

19 regulations prescribed by the Attorney 

20 General, and State law; 

21 ‘‘(iii) the partial fill is requested by 

22 the patient or the practitioner that wrote 

23 the prescription; and 

24 ‘‘(iv) the total quantity dispensed in 

25 all partial fillings does not exceed the total 

26 quantity prescribed. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4599 RFS 

1 ‘‘(B) OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES.—A pre2 scription for a controlled substance in schedule 

3 II may be partially filled in accordance with 

4 section 1306.13 of title 21, Code of Federal 

5 Regulations (as in effect on the date of enact6 ment of the Reducing Unused Medications Act 

7 of 2016). 

8 ‘‘(2) REMAINING PORTIONS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

10 subparagraph (B), remaining portions of a par11 tially filled prescription for a controlled sub12 stance in schedule II— 

13 ‘‘(i) may be filled; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) shall be filled not later than 30 

15 days after the date on which the prescrip16 tion is written. 

17 ‘‘(B) EMERGENCY SITUATIONS.—In emer18 gency situations, as described in subsection (a), 

19 the remaining portions of a partially filled pre20 scription for a controlled substance in schedule 

21 II— 

22 ‘‘(i) may be filled; and 

23 ‘‘(ii) shall be filled not later than 72 

24 hours after the prescription is issued.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 4599 RFS 

1 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec2 tion shall be construed to affect the authority of the Attor3 ney General to allow a prescription for a controlled sub4 stance in schedule III, IV, or V of section 202(c) of the 

5 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) to be par6 tially filled. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
c ,

# t'**&> '** 
F U GMJ.

. AS-j6 N ISLANDS

i'c.':l' c. rd<**c~l '** **,l',~ ,araort**  ACl ' li'T'l llo(" C :"= ('I U.S. Department of Transportation Mr

. Robert Finamore 400 7th Street, S.W., Room 6402 Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Statement of Reciprocity S<.ogarh i a 

### 21**mii 3':14~t;.9** **.:::.. loo**  105**RE-)·kjt~vfk** f ,:u: + 3'i<156.? i6 1 9**anoilcel<~r.d ,•** **•W\1\•' Cil<~.** **.**

Your Ref Dated

Our Ref Date FMS13030194 March 19 2013
Journal Key: 103

The Icelandic Civil Aviation Administration hereby confirms, that it will grant, on the basis of reciprocity
, to any air carrier designated by the United States of America, the right to conduct fifth, sixth and seventh freedom traffic rights on scheduled or non-scheduled basis, which are in conformity to the Air Transport Agreement between the Government of the United States and the Government oflceland, signed at Washington 14 June 1995 and as amended by exchange of diplomatic notes, 1 March 2002, and the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States, signed on April25 and 30, 2007, which Iceland and Norway became parties to on 17th December 2009

.

Reynir Director of Air Navigation & Aerodrome Division
### §285x. Additional subscription to shares

#### (a) United States share

(1) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized to subscribe on behalf of the United States to one hundred twenty-three thousand three hundred and seventy-five additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank.

(2) Any subscription to the capital stock of the Bank shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $1,322,999,476 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (c) Continued membership of Republic of China in Bank

(1) The Congress hereby finds that—

(A) the Republic of China (Taiwan) is a charter member in good standing of the Asian Development Bank;

(B) the Republic of China has grown from a borrower to a lender in the Asian Development Bank; and

(C) the Republic of China provides, through its economic success, a model for other nations in Asia.

(2) It is the sense of the Congress that—

(A) Taiwan, Republic of China, should remain a full member of the Asian Development Bank, and that its status within that body should remain unaltered no matter how the issue of the People's Republic of China's application for membership is disposed of;

(B) the President and the Secretary of State should express support of Taiwan, Republic of China, making it clear that the United States will not countenance attempts to expel Taiwan, Republic of China, from the Asian Development Bank; and

(C) the Secretary of the Senate and Clerk of the House shall transmit a copy of this resolution to the President with the request that he transmit such copy to the Board of Governors of the Asian Development Bank.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §27, as added Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title X, §1002], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1285.)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Accursio La Rocco, Appellant.

Judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, convicting the defendant of the crime of assault in the third degree, and suspending sentence, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Nolan and Wenzel, JJ.
### [§110. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, §1519(b)(1)(A), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 575]

Section, added and amended Pub. L. 105–178, title I, §1105(a), (c), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 130; Pub. L. 105–206, title IX, §9002(e), July 22, 1998, 112 Stat. 835; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(5) [title III, §304], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–306; Pub. L. 106–159, title I, §102(a)(2), Dec. 9, 1999, 113 Stat. 1752; Pub. L. 109–59, title I, §1105(a)–(e), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1165, 1166, related to revenue aligned budget authority.

Another section 110 was renumbered section 126 of this title.

A prior section 110, Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 894, related to project agreements, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 105–178, title I, §1105(a), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 130.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
### §1300g–6. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–89, title I, §107, Aug. 18, 1987, 101 Stat. 668, which prohibited gaming activities prohibited by the laws of the State of Texas on the reservation and on lands of the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 22, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60873

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EVAN DOSS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:98-CR-5-LS

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Evan Doss, Jr., appeals the revocation of his supervised

release from his underlying conviction for conspiracy to commit

bankruptcy fraud and fraudulent transfer of assets. He argues

that the district court erroneously concluded that he failed to

make genuine efforts to obtain employment and make restitution

payments and that he failed to explain adequately his reported

income of a $1,000 consultant fee. After reviewing the record,

we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to show by a

preponderance of the evidence that Doss violated his supervised
No. 04-60783

-2-

release, and the district court did not abuse its discretion. 

See United States v. Grandlund, 71 F.3d 507, 509 (5th Cir. 1995);

United States v. McCormick, 54 F.3d 214, 219 (5th Cir. 1995).

Doss also argues that his right to confrontation was

violated by the admission of hearsay testimony from his probation

officer. Because Doss did not object to the testimony in the

district court, our review is for plain error. See United States

v. Ferguson, 369 F.3d 847, 849 (5th Cir. 2004); see also United

States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993). Due process

affords Doss the right to confront and cross-examine adverse

witnesses unless there is a specific finding of good cause for

not allowing confrontation. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471,

489 (1972); McCormick, 54 F.3d at 221. Because we conclude that

the challenged hearsay testimony was not the only evidence

supporting the revocation of Doss’s supervised release, Doss

cannot show that the confrontation violations, if any, affected

his substantial rights and constituted plain error. See Olano,

507 U.S. at 734; McBride v. Johnson, 118 F.3d 432, 438 (5th Cir.

1997).

Finally, Doss argues that the district court erroneously

prevented him from attacking the underlying restitution order

during the revocation proceeding. The district court did not

err. See United States v. Holland, 850 F.2d 1048, 1050 (5th Cir.

1988); United States v. Irvin, 820 F.2d 110, 111 (5th Cir. 1987).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
### §176. Survey of reservations

Whenever it becomes necessary to survey any Indian or other reservations, or any lands, the same shall be surveyed under the direction and control of the Bureau of Land Management, and as nearly as may be in conformity to the rules and regulations under which other public lands are surveyed.

(R.S. §2115; 1946 Reorg. Plan No. 3, §403, eff. July 16, 1946, 11 F.R. 7876, 60 Stat. 1100.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2115 derived from act Apr. 8, 1864, ch. 48, §6, 13 Stat. 41.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

"Bureau of Land Management" substituted in text for "General Land Office" pursuant to section 403 of Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1946, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, which established the Bureau and transferred thereto the powers and duties of the General Land Office.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 175

 178

 180

 176

 176

 188

 185

 173

 175

 177

 176

 181

 177

 183

 180

 178

 179

 176

 184

 182

 185

 181

 179

 186

 182

 187

 187

 203

 178

 180

 178

 169

 168

 173

 168

 170

 169

 169

 168

 170

 173

 169

 170

 171

 158

 168

 170

 171

 168

 169

 172

 175

 166

 169

 166

 168

 175

 172

 158

 160

 168

 169

 173

 173

 175

 173

 172

 178

 175

 171

 172

 174

 172

 175

 174

 170

 173

 174

 174

 171

 176

 176

 179

 173

 174

 174

 175

 182

 181

 178

 169

 175

 175

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 16, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas P. Reed, Vice President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.         /s/ Thomas P. Reed   Thomas P. Reed   (chief financial officer)
#### Joseph J. Little v. Lucius T. Martin, as Executor.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### § 702.415 Fees for medical services; unresolved disputes on charges; procedure.

After issuance of specific findings of fact and proposed action by the Director as provided in § 702.414 any affected provider employer or other interested party has the right to seek a hearing pursuant to section 556 of title 5, United States Code. Upon written request for such a hearing, the matter shall be referred by the District Director to the OALJ for formal hearing in accordance with the procedures in subpart C of this part. If no such request for a hearing is filed with the district director within thirty (30) days the findings issued pursuant to § 702.414 shall be final.

[51 FR 4286, Feb. 3, 1986]
Exhibit 23.1


               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the use of our report dated April 27, 2001, included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Aphton  Corporation  for the year ended January 31, 2001,
with  respect to the  financial  statements,  as amended,  included in this Form
10-K/A.

                                                     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, FL
December 17, 2001
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 708.75

 708.77

 708.79

 708.87

 708.90

 708.89

 708.91

 708.98

 709.00

 709.01

 709.01

 709.01

 709.01

 709.01

 709.01

 709.01

 709.01

 709.02

 709.02

 709.02

 709.02

 709.02

 709.03

 709.04

 709.06

 709.06

 709.06

 709.07

 709.08

 709.10

 709.13

 826

 827

 827

 829

 830

 830

 830

 832

 833

 833

 833

 833

 833

 833

 833

 833

 833

 834

 834

 834

 834

 834

 834

 834

 835

 835

 835

 835

 835

 836

 837

STORAGE

+1

+1

+0

+2

+1

+0

+0

+2

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+1

+1

CHANGE

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 23, 2002

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +12 10 0 0

ACRE-FEET +12 20 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 825

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
### §1300h–7. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–420, §9, Sept. 8, 1988, 102 Stat. 1579; Pub. L. 101–301, §7, May 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 210, which related to constitutional amendment, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Sediment yield of the Castaic Watershed, western Los Angeles 
County, California -- A quantitative geomorphic approach

#### Professional Paper 422-F

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp422F 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:37
### SUBCHAPTER LXXVI—ASSINIBOINE TRIBES OF MONTANA: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
#### § 1822.14 What if I try to file a required document on the last day of the stated period for filing, but the BLM office where it is to be filed is officially closed all day?

BLM considers the document timely filed if we receive it in the office on the next day it is officially open.