alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 668.870 What is “program income” and how is it regulated in the INA program? ( a ) Program income is defined and regulated by WIA section 195(7), 20 CFR 667.200(a)(5) and the applicable rules in 29 CFR parts 95 and 97.
( b ) For grants made under this part, program income does not include income generated by the work of a work experience participant in an enterprise, including an enterprise owned by an Indian tribe or Alaska Native entity, whether in the public or private sector.
( c ) Program income does not include income generated by the work of an OJT participant in an establishment under paragraph (b) of this section.
#### Filogonia Rosa Elia NOYOLA RODRIGUEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75760.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

*234Antonio M. Zaldana, Esq., Law Office of Antonio M. Zaldana, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Esq., Song Park, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Filogonia Rosa Elia Noyola Rodriguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order pretermitting her application for cancellation of removal on the ground that she was statutorily precluded from demonstrating good moral character. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *Ramos v. INS,*246 F.3d 1264, 1266 (9th Cir.2001), and we grant the petition for review and remand for further proceedings.

Although substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that petitioner gave false testimony regarding an arrest in 1988, the government failed to meet its burden of offering “clear, unequivocal, and convincing evidence which does not leave the issue in doubt” that petitioner made this misrepresentation with the “subjective intent of obtaining immigration benefits.” *Kungys v. United States,*485 U.S. 759, 780, 781, 108 S.Ct. 1537, 99 L.Ed.2d 839 (1988) (internal quotations omitted). While the BIA stated that it agreed with the IJ’s conclusion, the IJ did not make a finding regarding petitioner’s subjective intent to obtain an immigration benefit. We therefore grant the petition for review and, in accordance with *INS v. Ventura,*537 U.S. 12, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam), remand so that the agency may consider petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal or voluntary departure in the alternative.

Because we grant the petition for the reasons stated above, we do not consider petitioner’s due process contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Address 100 Barr Harbor Drive

PO Box C700

W. Conshohocken, PA

19428-2959 | USA

Phone 610.832.9500

Fax 610.832.9666

Web www.astm.org

COMMITTEE E50 ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, RISK MANAGEMENT AND CORRECTIVE ACTION

CHAIRMAN: JULIE H KILGORE, WASATCH ENVIRONMENTAL INC, 2410 WEST CALIFORNIA AVE, SALT LAKE CITY, UT

84104, UNITED STATES (801) 972-8400, FAX: (801) 972-8459, E-MAIL: JK@WASATCHENVIRONMENTAL.COM 

FIRST VICE CHAIRMAN: DENNIS D ROUNDS, 116 N. MONROE, PIERRE, SD 57501, UNITED STATES (605) 224-5592,

E-MAIL: DENNISDROUNDS@GMAIL.COM 

SECOND VICE CHAIRMAN: HELEN A WALDORF, DEP BWP AND GREEN EPIPHANY, 28 POND ST, JAMAICA PLAIN, MA 02130, UNITED 

STATES (617) 407-2119, FAX: (617) 292-5530, E-MAIL: HAWALDORF@AOL.COM 

RECORDING SECRETARY: DAVID W PARSONAGE, AMERICAN GEOSCIENCES INC, 3925 REED BLVD SUITE 400, MURRYSVILLE, PA

15668, UNITED STATES (724) 733-7003, FAX: (724) 733-1003, E-MAIL: DPARSONAGE@AMERGEO.COM 

MEMBERSHIP SECRETARY: CHRISTOPHER P MCCORMACK, PULLMAN & COMLEY, LLC, PO BOX 7006, 850 MAIN STREET, BRIDGEPORT,

CT 06601, UNITED STATES (203) 330-2016, FAX: (203) 576-8888, E-MAIL: CMCCORMACK@PULLCOM.COM 

STAFF MANAGER: KATHLEEN MCCLUNG, (610) 832-9717, FAX: (610) 834-3638, E-MAIL: KMCCLUNG@ASTM.ORG

March 28, 2013

Mathy Stanislaus

US EPA 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW

WASHINGTON, DC 20460

Re: ASTM E1527

Dear Mr. Stanislaus:

ASTM International has completed a three-year revision process to enhance and strengthen the 

ASTM E1527-05 “Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I 

Environmental Site Assessment Process.” Attached is the recently balloted version of this 

practice, which has completed all technical and editorial reviews of the committee, 

demonstrating industry consensus for the proposed revisions. Since E1527 is currently 

referenced in the All Appropriate Inquiries Final Rule at 40 CFR Part 312, attached is a summary 

of the revisions and a redlined copy of the standard for EPA’s consideration. ASTM 

International Committee E50 requests that EPA update its reference from the 2005 edition to the 

2013 edition that will be available this year.

The agency’s reference to the most updated version of E1527 increases public-private 

collaboration, clarifies legal uncertainty and reduces confusion in the marketplace.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Committee E50 Staff Manager, 

Kate McClung, at kmcclung@astm.org, or by phone at 610-832-9717.
2

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely,

Julie Kilgore

Committee Chairman, ASTM Committee E50 on Environmental Assessment, Risk Management and 

Corrective Action 

Enclosures (2)

Cc: ASTM International Committee E50 Staff Manager
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Energy Resources, Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin Walrath, Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 15, 2011
/s/ Martin WalrathMartin WalrathPrincipal Accounting Officer





This certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated therein by reference.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 130.45

 129.92

 129.28

 129.02

 129.30

 129.49

 129.79

 130.04

 130.25

 130.48

 130.62

 130.18

 129.86

 129.45

 129.18

 129.65

 129.95

 130.18

 130.40

 130.62

 130.59

 130.16

 129.51

 129.15

 129.35

 129.65

 129.97

 130.07

 130.18

 628

 572

 510

 487

 512

 530

 559

 585

 607

 631

 646

 599

 566

 527

 501

 546

 576

 599

 623

 646

 643

 597

 532

 499

 517

 546

 578

 588

 599

STORAGE

+13

-56

-62

-23

+25

+18

+29

+26

+22

+24

+15

-47

-33

-39

-26

+45

+30

+23

+24

+23

-3

-46

-65

-33

+18

+29

+32

+10

+11

CHANGE

99

64

66

85

110

109

115

109

107

106

99

62

66

66

73

112

110

108

108

108

92

65

63

80

110

119

138

134

134

INFLOW

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 29

 33

PUTAH

 65

 65

 69

 70

 70

 74

 73

 70

 70

 68

 65

 60

 57

 60

 60

 62

 69

 70

 70

 70

 68

 62

 70

 70

 74

 77

 96

 100

 95

PUTAH

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .04

 .09

 .20

 .09

 .12

 .09

 .18

 .03

 .08

 .07

 .06

 .08

 .05

 .07

 .15

 .28

 .11

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .10

 .12

 .45

 .24

 .17

 .15

 .10

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .58

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .67

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 RUN DATE: 03/06/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -16 2,817 2,049 769 6 3.59 1.45

ACRE-FEET -16 5,588 4,064 1,525 12

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,525

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 4,064

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.45

JULY 1, 2011 8.92

 615

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
To : Aaron Worstell/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Cc: Bcc: Subject: Re: Can you provide current reagent costs ? From: Hanif Suchwani <HSuchwani@ftek.com> - Friday 03/02/2012 11:38 AM History: This message has been forwarded.

Hi Aaron, I lucked out and got a call back from the supplier today. Here are the prices (delivered) including some revisions to whatI gave you yesterday: Dry Urea= $ 500/ton, 50% Urea solution = $ 350/ton

. Anhydrous NH3 = $ 600/ton, 29% aqueous NH3 = $ 240/ ton and 19% aqueous NH3 = $ 200/ton. Let me know in case of any other questions I can as sist with. Best regards, Hanif Suchwani Director Business Development & Sales Operations Fuel Tech, Inc. 27601 Bella Vista Parkway Warrenville, IL 60555 W: 630-845-4498 C: 630-946-3867 Hsuchwani@ftek.com
**EXHIBIT 24.4**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOWALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned director of NewPage Corporation,a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), hereby constitutes and appointsMatthew L. Jesch, Douglas K. Cooper and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, withfull power to act without the others, the undersigned’s true and lawfulattorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution andre-substitution, for the undersigned and in the undersigned’s name, place andstead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2005, including any and all amendments andsupplements thereto, and to file such Annual Report on Form 10-K, with allexhibits and schedules thereto and other documents in connection therewith,with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto saidattorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to doeach and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might orcould do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that suchattorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute orsubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned director has caused this Power of Attorney tobe executed this 17th day of March, 2006.

 

 
|   | /s/ Lenard B. Tessler   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Lenard B. Tessler |

 

----
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4599 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to permit certain 

partial fillings of prescriptions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4599 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Unused 

3 Medications Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PARTIAL FILLS OF SCHEDULE II CONTROLLED SUB5 STANCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 309 of the Controlled 

7 Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 829) is amended by adding at 

8 the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(f) PARTIAL FILLS OF SCHEDULE II CONTROLLED

10 SUBSTANCES.— 

11 ‘‘(1) PARTIAL FILLS.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—A prescription for a 

13 controlled substance in schedule II may be par14 tially filled if— 

15 ‘‘(i) it is not prohibited by State law; 

16 ‘‘(ii) the prescription is written and 

17 filled in accordance with the Controlled 

18 Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 

19 regulations prescribed by the Attorney 

20 General, and State law; 

21 ‘‘(iii) the partial fill is requested by 

22 the patient or the practitioner that wrote 

23 the prescription; and 

24 ‘‘(iv) the total quantity dispensed in 

25 all partial fillings does not exceed the total 

26 quantity prescribed. 
3 

•HR 4599 EH

1 ‘‘(B) OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES.—A pre2 scription for a controlled substance in schedule 

3 II may be partially filled in accordance with 

4 section 1306.13 of title 21, Code of Federal 

5 Regulations (as in effect on the date of enact6 ment of the Reducing Unused Medications Act 

7 of 2016). 

8 ‘‘(2) REMAINING PORTIONS.— 

9 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

10 subparagraph (B), remaining portions of a par11 tially filled prescription for a controlled sub12 stance in schedule II— 

13 ‘‘(i) may be filled; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) shall be filled not later than 30 

15 days after the date on which the prescrip16 tion is written. 

17 ‘‘(B) EMERGENCY SITUATIONS.—In emer18 gency situations, as described in subsection (a), 

19 the remaining portions of a partially filled pre20 scription for a controlled substance in schedule 

21 II— 

22 ‘‘(i) may be filled; and 

23 ‘‘(ii) shall be filled not later than 72 

24 hours after the prescription is issued.’’. 
4 

•HR 4599 EH

1 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec2 tion shall be construed to affect the authority of the Attor3 ney General to allow a prescription for a controlled sub4 stance in schedule III, IV, or V of section 202(c) of the 

5 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)) to be par6 tially filled. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 11, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4599 

AN ACT 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to permit 

certain partial fillings of prescriptions.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T08:18:38-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: F AA- 2014 - 0193 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM234AD

A320 - 53 - 1251 --- 11/16/12

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSimulating the Impact Response of Three Full-Scale Crash Tests of Cessna 172 AircraftDuring the summer of 2015, a series of three full-scale crash tests were performed at the Landing and Impact Research Facility located at NASA Langley Research Center of Cessna 172 aircraft. The first test (Test 1) represented a flare-to-stall emergency or hard landing onto a rigid surface. The second test (Test 2) represented a controlled-flight- into-terrain (CFIT) with a nose down pitch attitude of the aircraft, which impacted onto soft soil. The third test (Test 3) also represented a CFIT with a nose up pitch attitude of the aircraft, which resulted in a tail strike condition. Test 3 was also conducted onto soft soil. These crash tests were performed for the purpose of evaluating the performance of Emergency Locator Transmitters and to generate impact test data for model calibration. Finite element models were generated and impact analyses were conducted to simulate the three impact conditions using the commercial nonlinear, transient dynamic finite element code, LS-DYNA®. The objective of this paper is to summarize test-analysis results for the three full-scale crash tests.Document ID20170007187Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJackson, Karen E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Fasanella, Edwin L.*(National Inst. of Aerospace Hampton, VA, United States)*Littell, Justin D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Annett, Martin S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Stimson, Chad M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 1, 2017Publication DateJuly 1, 2017Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219599NF1676L-27300L-20829Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 664817.02.07.03.02.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170007187.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 662.200 Who are the required One-Stop partners? ( a ) WIA section 121(b)(1) identifies the entities that are required partners in the local One-Stop systems.
( b ) The required partners are the entities that are responsible for administering the following programs and activities in the local area: ( 1 ) Programs authorized under title I of WIA, serving: ( i ) Adults;
( ii ) Dislocated workers;
( iii ) Youth;
( iv ) Job Corps;
( v ) Native American programs;
( vi ) Migrant and seasonal farmworker programs; and
( vii ) Veterans' workforce programs; (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(i));
( 2 ) Programs authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49 *et seq.*); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(ii));
( 3 ) Adult education and literacy activities authorized under title II of WIA; (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(iii));
( 4 ) Programs authorized under parts A and B of title I of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 720 *et seq.*); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(iv));
( 5 ) [Reserved]
( 6 ) Senior community service employment activities authorized under title V of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3056 *et seq.*); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(vi));
( 7 ) Postsecondary vocational education activities under the Carl D. Perkins Vocational and Applied Technology Education Act (20 U.S.C. 2301 *et seq.*); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(vii));
( 8 ) Trade Adjustment Assistance and NAFTA Transitional Adjustment Assistance activities authorized under chapter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2271 *et seq.*) and Section 123(c)(2) of the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reform Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107-210), respectively; see (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(viii));
( 9 ) Activities authorized under chapter 41 of title 38, U.S.C. (local veterans' employment representatives and disabled veterans outreach programs); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(ix));
( 10 ) Employment and training activities carried out under the Community Services Block Grant (42 U.S.C. 9901 *et seq.*); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(x));
( 11 ) Employment and training activities carried out by the Department of Housing and Urban Development; (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(xi)); and
( 12 ) Programs authorized under State unemployment compensation laws (in accordance with applicable Federal law); (WIA sec. 121(b)(1)(B)(xii).)
[65 FR 49398, Aug. 11, 2000, as amended at 71 FR 35523, June 21, 2006]
Table 25

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Preliminary Data Subject to Change Central Valley Operations Office

 Delta-Mendota Canal

Monthly Deliveries in AF 2018

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Tracy, City of 0 0 0 0 0 559 1,152 1,035 995 677 686 370 5,474

Byron Bethany ID (formerly Plainview WD) 17 194 163 482 893 1,020 1,204 849 452 255 196 40 5,765

West Side ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Banta Carbona ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 80 16 1 19 0 8 124

West Stanislaus ID 8 5 0 0 0 252 396 201 0 0 255 0 1,117

Patterson WD 65 852 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 917

Del Puerto WD 238 3,158 1,092 4,658 8,420 9,045 10,660 7,455 5,007 3,036 2,167 43 54,979

San Luis WD - Ag 8 616 228 590 855 1,252 1,401 1,017 476 223 179 76 6,921

San Luis WD - M&I 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3

Panoche WD - Ag 80 190 657 1,002 1,428 1,391 1,808 1,840 955 475 258 98 10,182

Panoche WD - M&I 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 2 2 2 25

Eagle Field WD 275 0 0 0 205 215 400 400 2 1 1 13 1,512

Oro Loma WD 0 1 0 0 36 42 54 39 7 0 0 2 181

Mercy Springs WD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Newman Wasteway Recirculation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

USBR/DWR Intertie @ MP7.70-R to 

CA Aqueduct 0 0 0 0 0 0 12,837 28,439 24,019 22,278 0 21,443 109,016

Total 693 5,018 2,142 6,734 11,841 13,778 29,994 41,294 31,917 26,966 3,744 22,095 196,216

Exchange Contractors

Central California ID (Abv CK 13) 3 758 118 707 1,809 1,710 2,489 1,819 1,001 711 629 41 11,795

Central California ID (Blw CK 13) 43 5,677 3,244 8,117 15,910 22,946 26,051 18,223 444 206 3,526 196 104,583

Firebaugh Canal Co 0 1,596 1,121 896 1,345 2,994 3,556 2,404 275 335 1,862 1,668 18,052

Total 46 8,031 4,483 9,720 19,064 27,650 32,096 22,446 1,720 1,252 6,017 1,905 134,430

Refuges

China Island Unit (CDFG) (76.05 & CCID) 842 708 354 271 380 286 644 23 197 308 632 313 4,958

Los Banos WMA (CDFG) (76.05 & CCID) 1,293 845 457 377 905 502 850 1,544 1,006 1,088 1,383 0 10,250

Salt Slough Unit (CDFG) (76.05 & CCID) 1,293 1,043 518 856 269 243 0 1,108 989 596 1,118 269 8,302

Volta WMA (CDFG) (Volta Wasteway) 513 952 140 0 0 0 487 1,879 2,211 1,630 1,276 289 9,377

Grasslands WD (76.05 & CCID) 2,712 3,199 1 958 9,370 4,309 1,694 4,882 20,961 13,710 7,301 0 69,097

Grasslands WD (Volta Wasteway) 0 2,104 0 635 1,020 150 0 1,901 16,809 11,099 2,470 0 36,188

Kesterson Unit (USFWS) (76.05 & CCID) 1,001 845 281 188 965 0 0 284 1,194 930 1,190 332 7,210

Kesterson Unit (USFWS) (Volta Wasteway) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Freitas Unit (USFWS) (76.05 & CCID) 1,001 938 284 344 795 29 0 0 548 813 1,336 374 6,462

Total 8,655 10,634 2,035 3,629 13,704 5,519 3,675 11,621 43,915 30,174 16,706 1,577 151,844

Total DMC Deliveries 9,394 23,683 8,660 20,083 44,609 46,947 65,765 75,361 77,552 58,392 26,467 25,577 482,490

O'Neill Net Pumping 173,066 5,871 140,788 67,462 925 3,422 26,006 68,274 78,376 115,636 74,831 201,219 955,876

DMC plus O'Neill Net Pumping 182,460 29,554 149,448 87,545 45,534 50,369 91,771 143,635 155,928 174,028 101,298 226,796 1,438,366

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.