alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.5

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

Perry D. Moore

Executive Vice President and CFO

Education Lending Services, Inc.

6 East Fourth Street, Suite 300

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202

The undersigned hereby certifies
that (i) he or she is an authorized officer of Education Loan Servicing Corporation (ELSC), (ii) a review of the activities of ELSC under:

(1) the Student Loan Origination and Servicing Agreement dated July 26, 2004, among ELSC, Fifth Third Bank as eligible lender trustee for Education Funding Resources, LLC, Education Funding Resources, LLC and
Education Lending Services, Inc.;

(2) the Student Loan Origination and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005, among ELSC, CIT
Education Loan Trust 2005-1 (the Trust), The Bank of New York as Eligible Lender Trustee on behalf of the Trust and Education Lending Services, Inc.; and

(3) the Student Loan Origination and Servicing Agreement dated July 1, 2005, between ELSC and Student Loan Xpress, Inc.

(items 1 through 3 being referred to collectively herein as the Servicing Agreements) for the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 has been made under the supervision of the
undersigned and (iii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, ELSC has fulfilled all its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period.



|              |  |        |  |                    
|------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------
|March 1, 2006 |  | By:    |  | /s/ David H. Harmon
|              |  | Name:  |  | David H. Harmon    
|              |  | Title: |  | President and CEO
#### § 702.341 Formal hearings; depositions; interrogatories.

The testimony of any witness, including any party represented by counsel, may be taken by deposition or interrogatory according to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as supplemented by local rules of practice for the Federal district court for the judicial district in which the case is pending. However, such depositions or interrogatories must be completed within reasonable times to be fixed by the Chief Administrative Law Judge or the administrative law judge assigned to the case.

[42 FR 42552, Aug. 23, 1977]
#### Kate Melbourne et al., Appellants, v. Niagara Falls Bridge Commission *903et al., Respondents.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
#### § 681.450 For how long must a local Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act youth program serve a participant?

Local youth programs must provide service to a participant for the amount of time necessary to ensure successful preparation to enter postsecondary education and/or unsubsidized employment. While there is no minimum or maximum time a youth can participate in the WIOA youth program, programs must link participation to the individual service strategy and not the timing of youth service provider contracts or program years.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 128

 133

 131

 130

 131

 132

 131

 134

 134

 135

 133

 132

 138

 126

 87

 95

 91

 85

 103

 121

 110

 114

 122

 133

 133

 132

 147

 136

 165

 132

 139

 122

 122

 128

 126

 127

 128

 129

 131

 130

 130

 126

 129

 123

 83

 76

 77

 80

 70

 70

 102

 102

 107

 110

 114

 122

 127

 126

 127

 121

 123

 126

 124

 128

 129

 128

 128

 129

 130

 132

 132

 132

 130

 131

 131

 97

 80

 84

 86

 79

 89

 108

 106

 111

 114

 122

 127

 129

 130

 130

 131

 127

 131

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
(April 12, 1948.)

#### In the Matter of Rose Watkins et al., as Tenants in Common, Petitioners, against Henry L. Ughetta, a Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

(No. 324.)

In the course of widening Van Wyck Expressway in the borough of Queens, forty-eight one and two-family houses are required to be removed. Under the authority of sections 381 and 384 of the New York City Charter and section 384-15.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the city proposes to condemn land, of which petitioners’ property is a part, located some distance from the Expressway, and to relocate the forty-eight houses thereon. This is an application by petitioners to this court for an order in the nature of prohibition, restraining the Justice assigned to the condemnation part, the City of New York and its corporation counsel, from making and entering any order and from taking any further proceedings, etc., looking to the acquisition in condemnation of petitioners’ property, on the ground that the property sought to be taken is not for a public use and because the section of the Administrative Code under which petitioners allege the city is proceeding is in violation of the Federal and State Constitutions. Application denied, without costs, on the ground that petitioners’ property is being taken for a public use. *(Brown*v. *United States,*263 U. S. 78.) The city is not proceeding to condemn under the authority of section 384-15.0 of the Administrative Code, added by chapter 898 of the Laws of 1947, but under the authority of sections 381 and 384 of the New York City Charter. The cited section of the Administrative Code is the authority for the relocation. (No. 325.) In view of the decision in *Matter of Watkins*v. *Ughetta*(No. 324, decided herewith) the motion is dismissed, without costs, as academic. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10554

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RODRIGO RAMIRO MENCHACA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:16-CR-35-1

Before REAVLEY, CLEMENT, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodrigo Ramiro 

Menchaca has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Menchaca has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 20, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10554 Document: 00514353956 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
No. 17-10554

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-10554 Document: 00514353956 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/20/2018
#### § 725.475 Termination of hearings.

Hearings are officially terminated when all the evidence has been received, witnesses heard, pleadings and briefs submitted to the administrative law judge, and the transcript of the proceedings has been printed and delivered to the administrative law judge.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 129.93

 129.85

 129.75

 129.69

 129.80

 129.84

 129.50

 129.32

 129.30

 129.29

 129.48

 129.74

 130.25

 130.52

 130.27

 129.99

 129.86

 130.32

 130.43

 130.12

 129.82

 129.76

 130.06

 129.93

 130.33

 130.37

 129.99

 129.71

 129.62

 130.01

 130.14

 573

 565

 556

 550

 560

 564

 531

 514

 512

 511

 529

 555

 607

 635

 609

 580

 566

 614

 626

 593

 562

 556

 587

 573

 615

 620

 580

 552

 543

 582

 595

STORAGE

+2

-8

-9

-6

+10

+4

-33

-17

-2

-1

+18

+26

+52

+28

-26

-29

-14

+48

+12

-33

-31

-6

+31

-14

+42

+5

-40

-28

-9

+39

+13

CHANGE

94

93

92

91

93

88

69

77

89

88

95

99

112

101

77

80

89

120

99

74

75

88

107

87

117

99

75

75

83

111

93

INFLOW

 27

 27

 27

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 28

 28

 28

 28

PUTAH

 66

 70

 70

 68

 62

 60

 60

 60

 64

 63

 60

 60

 60

 60

 64

 69

 70

 70

 67

 65

 65

 65

 65

 68

 70

 70

 68

 61

 60

 63

 58

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .15

 .08

 .06

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .09

 .09

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .18

 .13

 .11

 .06

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .47

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 RUN DATE: 02/04/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +24 2,830 2,001 817 2 1.83 .70

ACRE-FEET +24 5,613 3,969 1,621 4

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,621

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,969

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .70

JULY 1, 2012 15.05

 571

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,005.20

 1,004.93

 1,004.78

 1,004.70

 1,004.75

 1,004.70

 1,004.68

 1,004.64

 1,004.60

 1,004.52

 1,004.35

 1,004.23

 1,004.07

 1,004.02

 1,004.04

 1,004.09

 1,004.00

 1,003.84

 1,003.72

 1,003.69

 1,003.61

 1,003.54

 1,003.31

 1,003.14

 1,003.01

 1,002.83

 1,002.67

 1,002.59

 1,002.64

 1,002.61

 2,943.1

 2,937.1

 2,933.8

 2,932.0

 2,933.1

 2,932.0

 2,931.5

 2,930.7

 2,929.8

 2,928.0

 2,924.2

 2,921.5

 2,918.0

 2,916.9

 2,917.3

 2,918.4

 2,916.4

 2,912.9

 2,910.2

 2,909.5

 2,907.8

 2,906.2

 2,901.1

 2,897.4

 2,894.5

 2,890.5

 2,887.0

 2,885.2

 2,886.3

 2,885.7

STORAGE

+1.8

-6.0

-3.3

-1.8

+1.1

-1.1

-0.4

-0.9

-0.9

-1.8

-3.8

-2.7

-3.6

-1.1

+0.4

+1.1

-2.0

-3.5

-2.7

-0.7

-1.8

-1.5

-5.1

-3.8

-2.9

-4.0

-3.5

-1.8

+1.1

-0.7

CHANGE

 5,656

 2,070

 3,570

 4,158

 5,884

 4,864

 5,226

 5,088

 5,085

 4,889

 3,398

 4,359

 5,092

 5,032

 5,578

 6,430

 4,291

 3,398

 4,680

 4,236

 4,666

 4,592

 3,145

 3,663

 4,077

 2,500

 4,066

 4,553

 6,045

 5,422

INFLOW

 4,708

 5,033

 5,195

 4,971

 5,237

 5,387

 5,352

 5,458

 5,462

 5,754

 5,267

 5,667

 6,849

 5,586

 5,347

 5,848

 5,268

 5,093

 5,974

 4,532

 5,533

 5,366

 5,680

 5,560

 5,489

 4,467

 5,843

 5,441

 5,431

 5,755

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 46

 79

 59

 85

 85

 39

 98

 79

 72

 33

 39

 39

 39

 7

 7

 20

 33

 91

 46

 39

 26

 7

 33

 0

 39

 32

 0

 0

 58

 0

C.F.S.

 .07

 .12

 .09

 .13

 .13

 .06

 .15

 .12

 .11

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .06

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .05

 .14

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .01

 .05

 .00

 .06

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .70

 .06

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 14, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -55.9 135,713 162,553 0 0 1,230 1.88 1.25

ACRE-FEET -55,900 269,187 322,424 0 0 2,440

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 322,424

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 322,424

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.25

JULY 1, 2000 9.14

 2,941.4

Table 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         168,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,182,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                   877,741
<INVENTORY>                                    407,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,540,544
<PP&E>                                       3,440,517
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,376,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,202,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,325,874
<BONDS>                                      5,832,918
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       240,390
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,803,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,202,708
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,202,561
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,009,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               676,220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               266,080
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             356,560
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (111,072)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (332,765)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            221,693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   221,693
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of RF Industries,  Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Terrie A. Gross,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial condition  and results of operations
          of the Company.


   /s/ Terrie A. Gross
------------------------
Terrie A. Gross
Chief Financial Officer
June 12, 2003
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers Center
                                                300 Madison Avenue
                                                New York NY 10017
                                                Telephone (646) 471 3000
                                                Facsimile (813) 286 6000


                    Report of Independent Accountants

To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
GMAC Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying management
assertion (see Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was performed in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 21, 2006


















Exhibit 1

GMAC Mortgage


                  Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                      with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards


March 21, 2006


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers "USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $350,000,000 and $100,000,000
respectively.



/s/ Jim Hillsman
---------------------------------------
Jim Hillsman
Chief Operating Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Dave Bricker
---------------------------------------
Dave Bricker
Chief Financial Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Tony Renzi
---------------------------------------
Tony Renzi
Executive Vice President
GMAC Residential Holding Corp
§ 726.308 Service and computation of time. ( a ) Service of documents under this subpart while the matter is before OWCP shall be made by delivery to the person, an officer of a corporation, or attorney of record, or by mailing the document to the last known address of the person, officer, or attorney. If service is made by mail, it shall be considered complete upon mailing. Unless otherwise provided in this subpart, service need not be made by certified mail. If service is made by delivery, it shall be considered complete upon actual receipt by the person, officer, or attorney; upon leaving it at the person's, officer's, or attorney's office with a clerk or person in charge; upon leaving it at a conspicuous place in the office if no one is in charge; or by leaving it at the person's or attorney's residence.
( b ) Service made after a complaint is filed under § 726.309 must be made in accordance with 29 CFR part 18, as appropriate. When proceedings are initiated for review by the Administrative Review Board under § 726.314, service must be made in accordance with 29 CFR part 26, as appropriate.
( c ) The time allowed a party to file any response under this subpart shall be computed beginning with the day following the action requiring a response, and shall include the last day of the period, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or federally-observed holiday, *see* § 725.311 of Part 725 of this subchapter, in which case the time period shall include the next business day.
[65 FR 80097, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 86 FR 1779, Jan. 11, 2021]
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James S. Quarforth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238: 34-47986 Section III-E.];

(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting and

5. The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2006



/s/ James S. QuarforthJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors