alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.14

AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

EMPLOYMENT LETTER AGREEMENT

This Amendment No. 1 is made effective as of January 28, 2007, and modifies and amends the Employment Letter Agreement dated May 2, 2005 (Agreement) between NewPage Corporation
(Company) and James C. Tyrone (Executive). Terms defined in the Agreement have the same meaning when used in this Amendment unless otherwise indicated. For good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, Company and Executive agree as follows:



|1. | Section 2(c) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Annual Bonus. For performance periods during the Term, Executive will be entitled to participate in the NewPage Corporation management incentive or bonus plan or plans approved annually by the Board
of Directors of the Company (the Annual Incentive Plan). Executives target bonus will be 65% of Base Salary for achieving targets set annually pursuant to the terms the Annual Incentive Plan. Each annual bonus (Annual
Bonus) will be paid on or before March 15th of the year following the tax year in which the relevant services required for payment have been performed. There will be no cap on the amount of any Annual Bonus.



|2. | Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                   |  |                    
|------------------- |  | ----------------- |  | -------------------
|Company:            |  | Executive:       
|NewPage Corporation |  |                  
|                    |  |                  
|By:                 |  | /s/ Mark A. Suwyn |  | /s/ James C. Tyrone
|                    |  |                   |  | James C. Tyrone    
|Title:              |  | Chairman and CEO  |  |
§ 670.760 How will Job Corps coordinate with other agencies? ( a ) The Secretary issues guidelines for the National Office, Regional Offices, Job Corps centers and operational support providers to use in developing and maintaining cooperative relationships with other agencies and institutions, including law enforcement, educational institutions, communities, and other employment and training programs and agencies.
( b ) The Secretary develops polices and requirements to ensure linkages with the One-Stop delivery system to the greatest extent practicable, as well as with other Federal, State, and local programs, and youth programs funded under this title. These linkages enhance services to youth who face multiple barriers to employment and must include, where appropriate: ( 1 ) Referrals of applicants and students;
( 2 ) Participant assessment;
( 3 ) Pre-employment and work maturity skills training;
( 4 ) Work-based learning;
( 5 ) Job search, occupational, and basic skills training; and
( 6 ) Provision of continued services for graduates.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 13-2127 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v. COREY RIDOLFI, Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on October 6, 2014 is amended as follows: On page 2, line 4, replace "of stolen property" with "with stolen property" On page 13, line 10, replace "material evidence for" with "material evidence of" On page 13, line 13, replace "material evidence for" with "material evidence of" On page 14, line 7, replace "material evidence to" with "material evidence of" On page 14, line 10, replace "material evidence for" with "material evidence of"
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4416 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4416

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 17, 2016

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12715, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to three consecutive 2-year periods 
from the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by 
the Commission. Any obligation of the licensee for the payment of 
annual charges under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
803(e)) shall commence upon conclusion of the time period to commence 
construction of the project, as extended by the Commission under this 
subsection.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 
expiration and the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
shall take effect on the date of such expiration.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0562

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT EARL STAUDENMAYER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 26, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 19 2021

10/19/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0562
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2001 of
DAKOTA DISTRIBUTION INC.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2003
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CEO
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





In connection with the Annual Report of Zoro Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Andrew Brodkey, President/Chief Executive Officer and Jas Butalia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated: July 5, 2010                                                                                                                                  
|   





|                                                 |  |  |                                     | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  |  | ----------------------------------- | 
|"Andrew Brodkey"                                 |  |  | "Jas Butalia"                       | 
|Andrew Brodkey
President/Chief Executive Officer |  |  | Jas Butalia
Chief Financial Officer | 
|                                                 |  |
#### § 11.19 [Reserved]
### §1482. Premium charges; deposits in Indian Loan Guaranty and Insurance Fund

The Secretary shall fix such premium charges for the insurance and guarantee of loans as are in his judgment adequate to cover expenses and probable losses, and deposit receipts from such charges in the Indian Loan Guaranty and Insurance Fund established pursuant to section 1497(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title II, §202, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 79.)
#### Nicholas Marmaluk, Respondent, v. New York Dock Company, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Victor MONTES-FLORES, also known as Simon Blanco-Carriyo, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40792.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

*228James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Sarah Beth Landau, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Victor Montes-Flores (Montes) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being illegally present in the United States following removal subsequent to a conviction for an aggravated felony. Montes argues that the district court erred by requiring him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample from him as a condition of his supervised release. In *United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1101-02 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662), this court considered an indistinguishable challenge and held that it was not ripe for review because the possibility that the defendant’s DNA sample would be collected by the Bureau of Prisons rendered the possibility that his DNA sample would be collected while on supervised release conjecture. Accordingly, this portion of Montes’s appeal is dismissed.

Montes’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Montes contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Montes properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he *229raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §195. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(f)(2), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3380

Section, acts Aug. 7, 1882, ch. 433, 22 Stat. 330; Feb. 20, 1905, ch. 593, 33 Stat. 731; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309; July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §2, 46 Stat. 1016, related to admission to Saint Elizabeths Hospital of insane inmates of the National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
### §8565. Exceptions; waivers; implementation

#### (a) Exceptions

#### (1) Exception for intelligence, law enforcement, and national security activities

Sanctions under sections 8563 and 8564 of this title shall not apply to any authorized intelligence, law enforcement, or national security activities of the United States.

#### (2) Exception to comply with United Nations Headquarters agreement

Sanctions under section 8563(c)(2) of this title shall not apply with respect to the admission of an individual to the United States if the admission of the individual is necessary to permit the United States to comply with the Agreement regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, between the United Nations and the United States, the Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963, and entered into force March 19, 1967, or other applicable international obligations.

#### (b) National interests waiver

The President may waive the application of sanctions under section 8563 of this title with respect to a person if the President—

(1) determines that the waiver is in the national interests of the United States; and

(2) submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report on the waiver and the reasons for the waiver.

#### (c) Implementation; penalties

#### (1) Implementation

The President may exercise all authorities provided to the President under sections 1702 and 1704 of title 50 to carry out this subchapter.

#### (2) Penalties

A person that violates, attempts to violate, conspires to violate, or causes a violation of section 8563(c)(1) or 8564(b) of this title or any regulation, license, or order issued to carry out either such section shall be subject to the penalties set forth in subsections (b) and (c) of section 1705 of title 50 to the same extent as a person that commits an unlawful act described in subsection (a) of that section.

(Pub. L. 117–328, div. AA, title II, §206, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Masih Alinejad Harassment and Unlawful Targeting Act of 2022, also known as the Masih Alinejad HUNT Act of 2022, and not as part of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 which comprises this chapter.
### §1451. Congressional declaration of policy

It is hereby declared to be the policy of Congress to provide capital on a reimbursable basis to help develop and utilize Indian resources, both physical and human, to a point where the Indians will fully exercise responsibility for the utilization and management of their own resources and where they will enjoy a standard of living from their own productive efforts comparable to that enjoyed by non-Indians in neighboring communities.

(Pub. L. 93–262, §2, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 77.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2006 Amendment

Pub. L. 109–221, §1(a), May 12, 2006, 120 Stat. 336, provided that: "This Act [enacting section 494a of this title and section 1613a of Title 43, Public Lands, amending sections 348, 415, 464, 1481, 1485, 1486, 1497, 2206, 2706, and 2717 of this title and sections 1629b and 1629e of Title 43, enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 348 and 415 of this title and section 1629b of Title 43, and amending provisions set out as a note under section 2201 of this title] may be cited as the 'Native American Technical Corrections Act of 2006'."

#### Short Title of 2002 Amendment

Pub. L. 107–331, title I, §101, Dec. 13, 2002, 116 Stat. 2835, provided that: "This Act [enacting subchapter XIII of chapter 19 of this title, amending sections 415, 1484, and 1485 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 415 and 1485 of this title] may be cited as the 'Indian Financing Amendments Act of 2002'."

#### Short Title of 1984 Amendment

Pub. L. 98–449, §1, Oct. 4, 1984, 98 Stat. 1725, provided: "That this Act [enacting section 47a of this title and amending sections 1461, 1465, 1481, 1484, 1491, 1497, 1512, 1522, 1523, 1541, and 1543 of this title] may be cited as the 'Indian Financing Act Amendments of 1984'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 93–262, §1, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 77, provided: "That this Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Indian Financing Act of 1974'."
#### Aiman MUSLEH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75450.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

J. Jack Artz, Esq., Norwalk, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Attorney, Anthony C. Payne, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Aiman Musleh, a Palestinian and a citizen of Israel, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen to apply for adjustment of status based on his marriage to a United States citizen. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a). We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Musleh’s contentions regarding the BIA’s May 25, 2004 order because the instant petition *237for review is not timely as to that order. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1).

Musleh filed a timely petition for review of the BIA’s September 30, 2004 decision, denying his motion to reopen, but his brief failed to address the denial of reopening. He therefore waived that issue. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWALT, Inc.,
Alternative Loan Trust 2005-26CB;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 27, 2006


                                            /s/ Steve Bailey
                                            ----------------
                                            Steve Bailey
                                            Senior Managing Director
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Fred Weiss, Respondent, against William Hunt, as Warden of Attica State Prison. The People of the State of New York, Appellant.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.