alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard C. Larson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this transition report on Form 10-K for the six-month period ended December 31,2005 of Wauwatosa Holdings, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: March 27, 2006      /s/ Richard C. Larson     Richard C. Larson,  Chief Financial Officer
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Fort Niobrara National WildlifeRefuge hunting regulations**
 
2014_2015 | 2015_2016
 
SuDoc:I 49.44/2:F 77 N/4/
Item Number:0612-C (online)
CGP systemNumber:001011014
 
November 27, 2017
### §6729. United States assistance in inspections at private facilities

#### (a) Assistance in preparation for inspections

At the request of an owner of a facility not owned or operated by the United States Government, or contracted for use by or for the United States Government, the Secretary of Defense may assist the facility to prepare the facility for possible inspections pursuant to the Convention.

#### (b) Reimbursement requirement

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2), the owner of a facility provided assistance under subsection (a) shall reimburse the Secretary for the costs incurred by the Secretary in providing the assistance.

#### (2) Exception

In the case of assistance provided under subsection (a) to a facility owned by a person described in subsection (c), the United States National Authority shall reimburse the Secretary for the costs incurred by the Secretary in providing the assistance.

#### (c) Owners covered by United States National Authority reimbursements

Subsection (b)(2) applies in the case of assistance provided to the following:

#### (1) Small business concerns

A small business concern as defined in section 632 of title 15.

#### (2) Domestic producers of Schedule 3 or unscheduled discrete organic chemicals

Any person located in the United States that—

(A) does not possess, produce, process, consume, import, or export any Schedule 1 or Schedule 2 chemical; and

(B) in the calendar year preceding the year in which the assistance is to be provided, produced—

(i) more than 30 metric tons of Schedule 3 or unscheduled discrete organic chemicals that contain phosphorous, sulfur, or fluorine; or

(ii) more than 200 metric tons of unscheduled discrete organic chemicals.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title III, §310, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–880.)
### §12. Agent to negotiate commutation of annuities

The Commissioner of Indian Affairs is authorized to send a special Indian Agent, or other representative of his office, to visit any Indian tribe for the purpose of negotiating and entering into a written agreement with such tribe for the commutation of the perpetual annuities due under treaty stipulations, to be subject to the approval of Congress; and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs shall transmit to Congress said agreements with such recommendations as he may deem proper.

(Apr. 30, 1908, ch. 153, 35 Stat. 73.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with. See note set out under section 64 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §§291 to 295. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–694, §2, Sept. 2, 1960, 74 Stat. 739

Section 291, act Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 169, §1, 41 Stat. 1440, established a commission to make recommendations for memorials and entombments for Arlington Memorial Amphitheater.

Section 292, act Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 169, §2, 41 Stat. 1440, provided for a chairman and disbursing officer.

Section 293, act Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 169, §3, 41 Stat. 1440, required specific Congressional authorization for erection of memorials and interments.

Section 294, act Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 169, §4, 41 Stat. 1440, related to restrictions on inscriptions and entombments.

Section 295, act Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 169, §5, 41 Stat. 1440, related to character of the inscription.

Sections are covered by section 295a of this title.
### §811a. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §162(a), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 405

Section, act May 26, 1949, ch. 143, §3, 63 Stat. 111, related to administration of Foreign Service by Secretary of State and to delegation of authority to Secretary of State, with respect to such administration. See section 3921 et seq. of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal applicable with respect to officials, offices, and bureaus of Department of State when executive orders, regulations, or departmental directives implementing the amendments by sections 161 and 162 of Pub. L. 103–236 become effective, or 90 days after Apr. 30, 1994, whichever comes earlier, see section 161(b) of Pub. L. 103–236, as amended, set out as an Effective Date of 1994 Amendment note under section 2651a of this title.
#### § 701.503 Did the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 amend the recreational vessel exclusion?

Yes. The amended exclusion was effective February 17, 2009, the effective date of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

[76 FR 82128, Dec. 30, 2011]
(stating that expiration of a defendant's sentence renders any issue 

concerning computation of the sentence moot). 

As a separate and independent ground to deny relief, 

appellant's petition is procedurally barred. This is appellant's third 

challenge to the November 18, 2009, disciplinary hearing. On September 

21, 2011, appellant filed his first petition in district court case number 

C223092. On March 07, 2012, appellant attempted to file a petition 

challenging the same disciplinary hearing in district court case number 

C214506, the instant case, but the district court clerk correctly docketed 

the petition in a separate civil case number, A657750. See NRS 34.730(3). 

Both of those petitions were denied. Appellant only appealed the denial of 

his petition in district court case number C223092 but voluntarily 

withdrew that appeal prior to resolution on appeal. Hughes v. State, 

Docket No. 60457 (Order Dismissing Appeal, December 12, 2012). 

Thereafter, appellant filed the instant petition in case number, C214506. 

We conclude that appellant's petition was successive because 

he had previously filed two post-conviction petitions for a writ of habeas 

corpus challenging the same disciplinary hearing, and it constituted an 

abuse of the writ as he raised claims new and different from those raised 

in his previous petition. See NRS 34.810(2). Appellant's petition was 

procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual 

prejudice. NRS 34.810(3). Appellant failed to demonstrate good cause and 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

11101WIKMMENIMIkiii ' EINEM WNW 
J. 

J. 

3 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

ENIESSNEMEMINIFiE 

prejudice to overcome the procedural bars, and therefore, the district court 

did not err in denying the petition. 2Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' 

Gibbons 

1A-R 

Douglas 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge 

Michael Ray Hughes 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2We note that that the district court erroneously denied the petition 

based on the law-of-the-case doctrine and res judicata; nevertheless, we 

affirm the district court's decision to deny the petition for the reasons 

discussed in this order. Wyatt v. State, 86 Nev. 294, 298, 468 P.2d 338, 

341 (1970). 

'We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnnealing Effects on Creep and Rupture of Polycrystalline Alumina-Based FibersContinuous-length polycrystalline aluminum-oxide-based fibers are being considered as reinforcements for advanced high-temperature composite materials. For these fine-grained fibers, basic issues arise concerning grain growth and microstructural instability during composite fabrication and the resulting effects on the fiber's thermo-mechanical properties. To examine these issues, commercially available Nextel 610 (alumina) and Altex (alumina-silica) fibers were annealed at 1100 and 1300 C for up to 100 hr in air. Changes in fiber microstructure, fiber tensile creep, stress rupture, and bend stress relaxation (BSR) that occurred with annealing were then determined. BSR tests were also used to compare as-received and annealed fibers to other polycrystalline oxide fibers. Annealing was shown to have a significant effect, particularly on the Altex fiber, and caused it to have increased creep resistance.Document ID19990021540Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGoldsby, J. C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Yun, H. M.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Morscher, G. N.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*DiCarlo, J. A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1998Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208841NAS 1.15:208841E-10021Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990021540.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Lyoles Realty Corporation, Appellant, v. John M. Cannella, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §149. Indian Water Rights Settlement Completion Fund

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to be known as the "Indian Water Rights Settlement Completion Fund" (referred to in this section as the "Fund").

#### (b) Deposits

#### (1) In general

On the later of October 1, 2021, and November 15, 2021, out of any funds in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, the Secretary of the Treasury shall deposit in the Fund $2,500,000,000, to remain available until expended.

#### (2) Availability

Amounts deposited in the Fund under paragraph (1) shall be available to the Secretary of the Interior, without further appropriation or fiscal year limitation, for the uses described in subsection (c).

#### (c) Uses

Subject to subsection (d), amounts deposited in the Fund under subsection (b) shall be used by the Secretary of the Interior for transfers to funds or accounts authorized to receive discretionary appropriations, or to satisfy other obligations identified by the Secretary of the Interior, under an Indian water settlement approved and authorized by an Act of Congress before November 15, 2021.

#### (d) Scope of transfers

#### (1) In general

Transfers authorized under subsection (c) shall be made in such amounts as are determined by the Secretary of the Interior to be appropriate to satisfy the obligations of the United States, including appropriate indexing, pursuant to the applicable Indian water settlement.

#### (2) Sequence and timing

The Secretary of the Interior shall have the discretion to determine the sequence and timing of transfers from the Fund under subsection (c) in order to substantially complete the eligible Indian water settlements as expeditiously as practicable.

(Pub. L. 117–58, div. G, title I, §70101, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 1250.)
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      18, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.82

 130.93

 130.94

 130.80

 130.98

 130.74

 130.70

 130.82

 130.95

 130.88

 130.62

 130.91

 130.97

 130.91

 130.87

 130.67

 130.93

 130.75

 130.73

 130.62

 130.57

 130.76

 130.76

 130.59

 130.45

 130.63

 130.71

 130.69

 130.56

 130.76

 130.72

 669

 682

 683

 667

 688

 660

 656

 669

 684

 676

 646

 679

 686

 679

 675

 652

 682

 662

 659

 646

 641

 663

 663

 643

 628

 648

 657

 655

 640

 663

 658

STORAGE

+17

+13

+1

-16

+21

-28

-4

+13

+15

-8

-30

+33

+7

-7

-4

-23

+30

-20

-3

-13

-5

+22

+0

-20

-15

+20

+9

-2

-15

+23

-5

CHANGE

538

537

528

495

459

425

438

506

555

575

555

527

463

441

496

520

544

539

487

432

447

481

484

470

495

474

426

411

422

472

494

INFLOW

 40

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 40

 40

 39

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

PUTAH

 488

 491

 486

 462

 407

 399

 400

 459

 507

 539

 530

 470

 419

 405

 458

 492

 489

 509

 448

 399

 409

 429

 444

 442

 465

 426

 383

 374

 392

 422

 459

PUTAH

 1

 0

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .29

 .11

 .43

 .44

 .45

 .36

 .37

 .41

 .37

 .38

 .39

 .39

 .38

 .37

 .39

 .40

 .42

 .32

 .48

 .38

 .42

 .43

 .37

 .37

 .39

 .30

 .34

 .32

 .35

 .32

 .29

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

AUGUST 2022 RUN DATE: 09/07/2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +6 15,136 13,902 1,196 34 11.43 .00

ACRE-FEET +6 30,022 27,575 2,372 67

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,372

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 27,575

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2022 .00

 652

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 19.91
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.85

 130.78

 130.59

 130.80

 131.01

 130.96

 130.76

 130.74

 130.86

 130.81

 130.81

 130.83

 130.92

 130.87

 130.79

 130.65

 130.72

 130.68

 130.71

 130.83

 130.78

 130.78

 130.81

 130.56

 130.62

 130.72

 130.69

 130.77

 130.74

 130.66

 673

 665

 643

 667

 691

 685

 663

 660

 674

 668

 668

 670

 680

 675

 666

 650

 658

 654

 657

 670

 665

 665

 668

 640

 646

 658

 655

 664

 660

 651

STORAGE

+15

-8

-22

+24

+24

-6

-22

-3

+14

-6

+0

+2

+10

-5

-9

-16

+8

-4

+3

+13

-5

+0

+3

-28

+6

+12

-3

+9

-4

-9

CHANGE

476

457

466

496

512

513

482

452

442

451

485

496

493

456

386

352

371

375

378

368

337

315

327

318

377

396

382

338

282

279

INFLOW

 24

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

PUTAH

 443

 440

 456

 463

 479

 495

 472

 433

 414

 433

 464

 474

 467

 438

 370

 339

 346

 356

 355

 340

 319

 294

 304

 311

 353

 369

 363

 312

 263

 263

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .34

 .35

 .43

 .38

 .38

 .30

 .33

 .26

 .28

 .30

 .35

 .37

 .33

 .29

 .28

 .29

 .30

 .30

 .37

 .34

 .29

 .30

 .29

 .30

 .29

 .29

 .29

 .18

 .19

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 RUN DATE: 10/21/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -7 12,258 11,628 604 30 9.19 .00

ACRE-FEET -7 24,314 23,064 1,198 60

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,198

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 23,064

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2002 .00

 658

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
§ 726.106 Type of security. ( a ) The Office shall determine the type or types of security which an applicant shall or may procure. (See § 726.104(b).)
( b ) In the event the indemnity bond option is selected, the bond shall be in such form and contain such provisions as the Office may prescribe: *Provided,* That only corporations may act as sureties on such indemnity bonds. In each case in which the surety on any such bond is a surety company, such company must be one approved by the U.S. Treasury Department under the laws of the United States and the applicable rules and regulations governing bonding companies (see Department of Treasury's Circular—570).
( c ) An applicant for authorization to self-insure based on a deposit of negotiable securities, in the amount fixed by the Office, shall deposit any negotiable securities acceptable as security for the deposit of public moneys of the United States under regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury. (See 31 CFR part 225.) The approval, valuation, acceptance, and custody of such securities is hereby committed to the several Federal Reserve Banks and the Treasurer of the United States.