alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table of Contents

Exhibit13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-Fof StealthGas Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) for thefiscal year ending December  31,  2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), the undersigned officer of theCompany hereby certifies to the undersigned’s knowledge,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.  Section  1350), that:

|  |          |                                                                                                                     |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1.  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2.  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Dated: April 19, 2006

|                                                     |  |  |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--|--|
| /s/ Harry N.Vafias                                  |
| Harry N. VafiasPresident and ChiefExecutive Officer |
|                                                     |

----
### **CHAPTER 49—SAVANNA'S ACT**

Sec.
5701.
Purposes.
5702.
Definitions.
5703.
Improving Tribal access to databases.
5704.
Guidelines for responding to cases of missing or murdered Indians.
5705.
Annual reporting requirements.
#### William J. Blacklock, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 129.16

 129.48

 129.71

 129.63

 129.55

 129.76

 129.83

 129.70

 129.52

 129.66

 129.88

 130.21

 130.25

 130.35

 130.39

 130.38

 130.06

 130.00

 129.96

 130.18

 130.37

 130.19

 129.96

 129.99

 130.15

 130.38

 130.75

 130.35

 130.11

 130.24

 130.44

 499

 529

 552

 544

 536

 556

 563

 551

 533

 547

 568

 602

 607

 618

 622

 621

 587

 581

 577

 599

 620

 600

 577

 580

 596

 621

 662

 618

 592

 605

 627

STORAGE

+6

+30

+23

-8

-8

+20

+7

-12

-18

+14

+21

+34

+5

+11

+4

-1

-34

-6

-4

+22

+21

-20

-23

+3

+16

+25

+41

-44

-26

+13

+22

CHANGE

64

75

72

56

62

76

76

75

81

93

93

94

95

107

106

105

112

133

172

215

212

212

226

258

269

270

265

288

358

386

396

INFLOW

 23

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 113

 146

 99

 60

PUTAH

 38

 35

 35

 35

 41

 41

 47

 56

 65

 61

 56

 51

 66

 75

 78

 80

 103

 110

 148

 179

 176

 196

 212

 230

 235

 231

 219

 196

 224

 279

 324

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .07

 .09

 .09

 .14

 .10

 .14

 .11

 .12

 .05

 .07

 .15

 .15

 .14

 .14

 .15

 .19

 .17

 .19

 .24

 .08

 .12

 .37

 .18

 .19

 .24

 .17

 .10

 .23

 .31

 .23

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MARCH 2007 RUN DATE: 04/02/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +134 5,102 3,922 1,091 18 4.87 .07

ACRE-FEET +134 10,120 7,779 2,164 36

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,164

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 7,779

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .07

JULY 1, 2006 12.30

 493

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              MARWICH II, LTD.
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Porath,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 230

 239

 225

 223

 225

 220

 219

 228

 215

 215

 208

 210

 218

 220

 227

 229

 223

 217

 223

 214

 218

 227

 235

 193

 209

 183

 181

 187

 194

 196

 196

 183

 185

 176

 176

 173

 172

 178

 176

 175

 174

 176

 177

 175

 177

 177

 177

 175

 173

 176

 178

 166

 177

 167

 166

 162

 152

 144

 149

 157

 158

 158

 210

 208

 197

 199

 195

 197

 193

 197

 191

 193

 194

 196

 199

 203

 203

 202

 196

 190

 194

 195

 195

 198

 192

 176

 177

 166

 160

 168

 175

 176

 176

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### § 901.32 Receipt of information concerning enrolled actuaries.

If an officer or employee of the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Labor, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or a member of the Joint Board has reason to believe that an enrolled actuary has violated any provision of this part, or if any such officer, employee or member receives information to that effect, he/she may make a written report thereof, which report or a copy thereof shall be forwarded to the Executive Director. If any other person has information of any such violation, he/she may make a report thereof to the Executive Director.

[43 FR 39757, Sept. 7, 1978, as amended at 76 FR 17776, Mar. 31, 2011]
Exhibit 24.8

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Douglas K. Cooper, David J. Prystash, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of
them, with full power to act without the others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other
documents in connection with the Form 10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 12th day of
February, 2010.



/s/ George J. Zahringer,
IIISignaturePrintName:

George J. Zahringer,
III
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Black Nickel Acquisition Corp. III (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Pruitt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





February 25, 2011

/s/ Michael D. PruittMichael d. Pruitt, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
### §16. Allowance of rations to Navy hospitals

For every Navy officer, seaman, or marine admitted into a Navy hospital, the institution shall be allowed one ration per day during his continuance therein, to be deducted from the account of the United States with such officer, seaman, or marine.

(R.S. §4812.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4812 derived from act Feb. 26, 1811, ch. 26, §5, 2 Stat. 650.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, (the Form 10-Q),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 9, 2006
    /s/ David P. SuleskiDavid P. SuleskiChief Financial Officer
# - -. Bryan W , Shaw, Ph.D., Chairman Buddy Garcia, Commissioner Carlos Rubinstein, Commissioner Mark H, Vickery, P.C . , Executil'e Director 

# Rt:"CEIVED

" -

.....

### --'" 

## 11JUN - 6 

## P H 2: 20 TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL 

### QCALISF.)f- :. R F

JNO D IV

. 

## DIRECTOR'S OF C. Protecting Texas by Reducing and Pr el'f!11ting P ol/

ution 

### May 25.2011 

### ::k 

### r •.

I' r Mr. Samuel Coleman, P.E.. Director Superfund Division CJ"'> 

### nU.S. Environmental Pwtection Agency, Region 6 

### 1445 Ross Avenue --T) <' '-.;'

- , 

## r:- 

## . . Dallas, Texas 75202 Re: State Marine of Port Arthur Superfund Site, Jefferson County, Texas Direct Final Action to Delete 

### from the National Priorities 

### List (NPL) Dear Mr. Coleman: .**~..,:;;; '**  "\, \

The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) has reviewed the Draft Notice of Direct Final Action for the referenced site. We concur 'vvith the conclusion 

### that "all appropriate response actions under CERCLA at 

### the State 

### Marine of Port Arthur Superfund Site have been completed. " 

# _.**~"**

Because the selected remedy resulted in hazardous substances remaining onsite at concentrations that do not allow unlimited use, reviews will be required at least as often as every five years 

### from the initiation of the remedial action. The TCEQ also notes that the EPA has obtained Restrictive Covenants from the lando'wner, which have been filed among the appropriate property records for 

### the site, indicating that the future use of the property is restricted 

### to commercial/industrial purposes. The TCEQ understands that 

### this Direcl Final Action 

### will be effective 

### 60 days from the date 

### of**pu~Jication in~he_**  

### Federal Register**~nl~ss th~** **E~~ ~ece~~~s_~gl}ifica.nt** **?~vers~ ~r** **e~iti~al** . . comments within 30 days of publication in the 

### Federal Register, in ,"vhich case the EPA 

### will publish a document that withdraws this action. 

### In summary, the TCEQ concurs \Nith the EPA proposal to delete the State Marine of Port Arthur Superfund Site from the NPL by Direct Final Action.

Mark R. Vickery, P
.G
. Executive Director MVjJPjc'vV


### p.o . Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711 · 3087 512 · 239 · 1 000 Ioternet address: \\'ww .tceq .state , Lx, us
Table 24

U.S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Preliminary Data Subject to Change Central Valley Operations Office

San Joaquin and Mendota Pool

Monthly Deliveries in AF 2015

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Fresno Slough WD 0 0 34 0 135 168 226 131 6000 700

Tranquility Public Utilities District 

(TPUD) (formerly Hughes, Melvin) 0 28 0 0 12 23 26 16 0 0 0 0 105

James ID 0 34 0 1,512 2,138 5,947 1,641 179 119 0 0 0 11,570

Meyers (SLWD) 235 27 24 25 62 86 102 101 54 0 976 1,322 3,014

Dudley & Indart (formerly Coelho-GardnerHanson) 15 117 552 378 393 611 510 391 239 269 38 0 3,513

Mid-Valley WD (no contract) 000000000000 0

Reclamation District #1606 0 1 86 52 125 130 30 00000 424

Terra Linda Farms (Coelho Family Trust) 334 365 483 505 835 1,177 1,038 505 465 534 48 4 6,293

Tranquility ID 214 2,175 1,314 1,308 3,123 5,507 4,672 3,030 1,314 299 293 0 23,249

Westlands WD (Lateral 6 & 7) 0 663 0 0 0 0 1,867 2,515 1,772 166 101 31 7,115

Lempesis V.L. (Wilson, JW) 0 35 25 75 90 112 47 24 16 13 5 0 442

Laguna WD (via CCID) 000000000000 0

San Luis WD (via CCID) 0 0 2 7 3 12 11 9 13 5 0 1 63

Total 798 3,445 2,520 3,862 6,916 13,773 10,170 6,901 3,998 1,286 1,461 1,358 56,488

Exchange Contractors

Central California ID (CCID) 0 12,978 29,585 19,582 23,657 39,984 40,661 31,784 12,170 6,427 7,073 3,374 227,275

Columbia Canal Co 8 1,973 2,101 3,721 5,143 5,719 6,087 3,562 2,524 646 0 65 31,549

Firebaugh Canal WD 0 491 1,537 428 1,670 4,591 5,228 2,507 1,775 1,217 1,209 573 21,226

San Luis Canal Co (SLCC) 0 1,322 2,988 2,201 6,006 17,348 20,549 11,529 5,289 4,346 1,703 0 73,281

Total 8 16,764 36,211 25,932 36,476 67,642 72,525 49,382 21,758 12,636 9,985 4,012 353,331

Refuges

Grasslands WD (via CCID & SLCC ) 173 0 0 0 0 0 0 89 6,881 21,789 7,868 3,233 40,033

China Island Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 469 289 8 0 0 72 32 77 28 0 368 122 1,465

Los Banos WMA (CDFG) (via CCID & SLCC 941 1,379 0 195 52 154 235 514 2,461 1,687 1,654 1,882 11,154

Mendota Wildlife Area (CDFG) 1,570 1,919 597 797 123 56 298 1,515 2,508 3,741 1,632 4,396 19,152

Salt Slough Unit (CDFG) (via CCID) 655 578 0 0 0 0 35 121 932 859 498 224 3,902

Freitas Unit (USFWS) (via CCID) 601 396 157 117 80 0 0 0 443 816 565 193 3,368

Kesterson (USFWS) (via CCID) 0 228 169 0 0 0 0 0 953 1,105 583 258 3,296

San Luis NWR (USFWS) (via SLCC) 0 10,072 2,060 447 381 0 0 261 0 0 1,761 1,686 16,668

0

Total 4,409 14,861 2,991 1,556 636 282 600 2,577 14,206 29,997 14,929 11,994 99,038

Total Deliveries 5,215 35,070 41,722 31,350 44,028 81,697 83,295 58,860 39,962 43,919 26,375 17,364 508,857

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
No. 11,702.

#### Zuver *v.*Industrial Commission, et al.

Decided January 10, 1927.

Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Judgment of dismissal.

*Affirmed.*

1. Workmen's *Compensation*— Award—Petition *for Beview.*Where on petition for review of award of a referee denying compensation, the referee sends the case to the commission which also denies compensation, no court action lies, in the absence of a petition to review the final award.

2. *Petition for Beview.*Withdrawal of attorney, and claimant's ignorance of necessity for a petition for review, do not excuse a noncompliance with the statute.

*Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. George F. DunMee, Judge.*

Mr. Harry C. Green, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William L. Boatright, Attorney General, Mr. Jean S. Breitenstein, Assistant, Messrs. Smith & Brock, Mr. Milton Smith, Jr., for defendants in error.

*En banc.*

*430Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff in error brought suit to review the action of the Industrial Commission which denied him compensation. His case was dismissed and he brings error. The judgment was right.

Zuver’s claim was disallowed by the referee, and, on motion for review, the referee sent the whole case to the commission which also denied compensation. No petition for review was then made to the commission. Under these facts no action lies in the district court to review the commission’s award. *Carlson v. Industrial Com.,*79 Colo. 124, 244 Pac. 68. See also *Brady v. Industrial Com.,*80 Colo. 62, 249 Pac. 6.

Plaintiff in error argues that his attorney withdrew after the commission’s award, and that he did not know that the application for review was necessary, but we cannot ignore the statute.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chiee Justice Allen not participating.
#### § 418.1145 How do we determine your income-related monthly adjustment amount if IRS does not provide information about your modified adjusted gross income?

In general, if we do not receive any information for you from IRS showing that you had modified adjusted gross income above the threshold in the tax year we request, we will not make an income-related monthly adjustment amount determination.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         102,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    276,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               568,000
<PP&E>                                       3,953,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,834,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,465,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,693,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,462,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,465,000
<SALES>                                     11,267,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,267,000
<CGS>                                        9,596,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,451,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               496,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (701,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (708,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (708,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
### **CHAPTER 41—INDIAN LANDS OPEN DUMP CLEANUP**

Sec.
3901.
Findings and purposes.
3902.
Definitions.
3903.
Inventory of open dumps.
3904.
Authority of Director of Indian Health Service.
3905.
Contract authority.
3906.
Tribal demonstration project.
3907.
Authorization of appropriations.
3908.
Disclaimers.
Exhibit 4.1


 


		 This Certifies That BY INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AUTHORIZED: 50,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value of IDEAL POWER INC. CUSIP 451622 20 3 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: EQUINITI TRUST COMPANY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signature of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE . . AMERICAN FINANCIAL PRINTING, INC. 







    


     


    

		 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in commonUTMA – Custodian (Cust)(Minor) TEN ENT– as tenants by entiretiesunder Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN– as joint tenants with right of survivorshipAct and not as tenants in common(State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For value receivedhereby sell, assign, and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated X X NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
### §1246. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–59, §6, July 29, 1971, 85 Stat. 159, which exempted funds distributed per capita under the provisions of this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.