alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Max Aronson et al. v. Bronx County Trust Company, Individually and as Successor Trustee of 1161 Shakespeare Avenue Apartment Building [New York City], under a Mortgage Trust Made between R. G. & F. Construction Corporation and Colonial Bank, as Trustee.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss Pumping

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total Daily Total

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS In Acre Feet

Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss (4.33) Loss (4.33) Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3,136 807 3,943 6,220 1,600 7,820

2-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,935 808 2,744 3,839 1,603 5,442

3-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 125 841 966 248 1,669 1,917

4-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,829 2,763 4,591 3,627 5,480 9,107

5-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,076 2,777 3,853 2,135 5,508 7,643

6-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,734 881 2,616 3,440 1,748 5,188

7-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2,533 876 3,410 5,025 1,738 6,763

8-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,913 876 2,789 3,795 1,737 5,532

9-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,476 876 2,352 2,928 1,738 4,666

10-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,797 876 2,673 3,565 1,737 5,302

11-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,926 876 2,802 3,820 1,738 5,558

12-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2,135 876 3,011 4,235 1,738 5,973

13-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2,605 877 3,482 5,168 1,739 6,907

14-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5,620 877 6,497 11,147 1,740 12,887

15-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5,120 876 5,996 10,156 1,737 11,893

16-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5,411 876 6,287 10,733 1,737 12,470

17-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3,553 874 4,427 7,048 1,733 8,781

18-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2,660 2,660 0 5,276 5,276

19-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1,280 1,280 0 2,539 2,539

20-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 844 844 0 1,674 1,674

21-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1,177 3,469 4,646 2,334 6,881 9,215

22-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4,289 3,476 7,765 8,507 6,894 15,401

23-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5,030 938 5,968 9,977 1,860 11,837

24-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4,862 925 5,787 9,644 1,835 11,479

25-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4,854 928 5,781 9,627 1,840 11,467

26-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4,859 1,832 6,691 9,637 3,634 13,271

27-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5,579 1,812 7,391 11,066 3,595 14,661

28-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6,053 1,853 7,906 12,006 3,675 15,681

29-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 6,481 1,828 8,309 12,856 3,625 16,481

30-Nov-19 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 7,074 1,828 8,902 14,032 3,626 17,658

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 94,185 42,185 136,370 186,815 83,674 270,489

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

NOVEMBER 2019

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

STEPHANIE ANN BUDIHAS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 838 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### § 11.10 Scope and applicability.

The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9601 *et seq.,* and the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376, provide that natural resource trustees may assess damages to natural resources resulting from a discharge of oil or a release of a hazardous substance covered under CERCLA or the CWA and may seek to recover those damages. This part supplements the procedures established under the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP), 40 CFR part 300, for the identification, investigation, study, and response to a discharge of oil or release of a hazardous substance, and it provides a procedure by which a natural resource trustee can determine compensation for injuries to natural resources that have not been nor are expected to be addressed by response actions conducted pursuant to the NCP. The assessment procedures set forth in this part are not mandatory. However, they must be used by Federal or State natural resource trustees in order to obtain the rebuttable presumption contained in section 107(f)(2)(C) of CERCLA. This part applies to assessments initiated after the effective date of this final rule.

[53 FR 5171, Feb. 22, 1988]
### §8571. Statement of policy

It is the policy of the United States—

(1) to deny Iran the ability to engage in destabilizing activities, support international terrorism, fund the development and acquisition of weapons of mass destruction and the means to deliver such weapons by limiting export of petroleum and petroleum products by Iran;

(2) to deny Iran funds to oppress and commit human rights violations against the Iranian people assembling to peacefully redress the Iranian regime;

(3) to fully enforce sanctions against those entities which provide support to the Iranian energy sector; and

(4) to counter Iran's actions to finance and facilitate the participation of foreign terrorist organizations in ongoing conflicts and illicit activities due to the threat such actions pose to the vital national interests of the United States.

(Pub. L. 118–50, div. J, §2, Apr. 24, 2024, 138 Stat. 963.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act, also known as the SHIP Act, and not as part of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

For short title of this subchapter as the "Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act", also known as the "SHIP Act", see section 1 of div. J of Pub. L. 118–50, set out as a Short Title of 2024 Amendment note under section 8501 of this title.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 22, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00689

- CR

Antoinette MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR12772B

Honorable Cath erine Torres

- Stahl, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellee’s first motion for extension of time is GRANTED. The appellee’s brief is

due on May 4, 2018

.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 22nd day of March, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Herman Barmore, Appellant, against William Hunt, as Warden of Attica State Prison, Respondent.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ. [See *post,*p. 921.]
#### § 702.223 Claims; time limitations; time to object.

Notwithstanding the requirements of § 702.221, failure to file a claim within the period prescribed in such section shall not be a bar to such right unless objection to such failure is made at the first hearing of such claim in which all parties in interest are given reasonable notice and opportunity to be heard.

[38 FR 26861, Sept. 26, 1973. Redesignated and amended at 50 FR 397, Jan. 3, 1985]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 825.52

 825.53

 825.55

 825.54

 825.53

 825.53

 825.53

 825.53

 825.54

 825.58

 825.67

 825.99

 826.27

 826.40

 826.48

 826.55

 826.58

 826.61

 826.64

 826.64

 826.64

 826.61

 826.61

 826.62

 826.62

 826.63

 826.71

 826.76

 826.78

 826.78

 32.47

 32.48

 32.50

 32.49

 32.48

 32.48

 32.48

 32.48

 32.49

 32.53

 32.62

 32.95

 33.24

 33.37

 33.45

 33.53

 33.56

 33.59

 33.62

 33.62

 33.62

 33.59

 33.59

 33.60

 33.60

 33.61

 33.69

 33.74

 33.77

 33.77

STORAGE

+0.02

+0.01

+0.02

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

+0.04

+0.09

+0.33

+0.29

+0.14

+0.08

+0.07

+0.03

+0.03

+0.03

+0.00

+0.00

-0.03

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.01

+0.08

+0.05

+0.02

+0.00

CHANGE

44

40

43

29

29

34

34

34

38

54

78

197

179

102

74

69

49

49

49

36

35

21

33

38

33

37

74

60

44

33

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

OUTLET

 2

 3

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 4

 3

 5

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 2

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .05

 .09

 .04

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .05

 .04

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .13

 .10

 .15

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .06

 .04

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .07

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .38

 .58

 .36

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .67

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 RUN DATE: 12/07/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.31 1,669 360 600 45 1.36 2.31

ACRE-FEET +1,310 3,310 714 1,190 89

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,190

OUTLET

TOTAL

 714

 1,904

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.31

JULY 1, 2004 5.74

 32.45

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### Frank Lohman *v.*The Cass County Bank.

Party *plaintiff—in suit on indorsed note.*Where a promissory note shows an indorsement of the same to the plaintiff by the payee, the suit is properly brought in the plaintiff’s name, as the party holding the legal title, and the action can not be defeated by showing that another person is entitled to the proceeds, or a portion thereof. The rights of such other person are not prejudiced by the recovery, but he may look to the plaintiff.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cass county; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Judge, presiding.

This was a suit brought by the Cass County Bank against Frank Lohman, upon a promissory note. The note and indorsement were as follows:

“ $65.00. *Ashland, Ill., May*4, 1875.

Three months after date, I promise to pay Charles Clark, or order, sixty-five dollars, for value received.

Frank Lohman.”

*“*I assign the within note to Cass County Bank.

Charles Clark.”

“James M. North.”

The defendant proved, by William Jones, that the note had been simply assigned to the bank for collection ; that he knew J. M. North, the second indorsee, presented the same to the bank, and indorsed it to the bank for collection as his, North’s, agent. He knew this because he was interested with North in a portion of the proceeds of the note. The point was made i n this court that the record did not show the fact of assignment or indorsement of the note being in evidence.

Mr. Oscar A. DeLeuw, for the appellant.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This action was originally brought before a justice of the peace of Cass county, by the Cass County Bank, as plaintiff, *617and against Frank Lehman, defendant, on a promissory note executed by Lohman to one Charles Clark, who indorsed it to plaintiff. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appealed to the circuit court, where the cause was tried by the court, by consent, without a jury, which resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff, to reverse which the defendant appeals to this court.

We see no force in the objection made by appellant. By the indorsement of Clark, the payee of the note, to the bank, the bank became possessed of the legal title, and could bring the action. The note, with the indorsement of Clark thereon, was before the court, and furnished evidence that the legal title was in the bank. If James M. North, whose name also appears on the back of the note, has any interest in the proceeds of this recovery by the bank, he can sue the bank, and recover the same. His rights are not at all prejudiced by this recovery.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### The People of the State of New York v. Rudolph Zilbert.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 821.56

 821.55

 821.55

 821.53

 821.52

 821.06

 820.56

 819.85

 819.24

 818.63

 818.01

 817.32

 816.67

 816.01

 815.36

 814.67

 813.98

 813.25

 812.55

 811.80

 811.10

 810.34

 809.58

 808.80

 808.00

 807.35

 806.46

 806.00

 805.66

 805.66

 805.78

 28.59

 28.58

 28.58

 28.56

 28.55

 28.12

 27.65

 27.00

 26.45

 25.90

 25.35

 24.75

 24.19

 23.63

 23.08

 22.51

 21.95

 21.37

 20.82

 20.24

 19.70

 19.14

 18.58

 18.02

 17.45

 17.00

 16.39

 16.08

 15.85

 15.85

 15.93

STORAGE

+0.00

-0.01

+0.00

-0.02

-0.01

-0.43

-0.46

-0.65

-0.55

-0.55

-0.55

-0.60

-0.56

-0.56

-0.54

-0.57

-0.56

-0.58

-0.55

-0.58

-0.53

-0.57

-0.56

-0.56

-0.57

-0.45

-0.61

-0.31

-0.22

+0.00

+0.08

CHANGE

34

28

34

23

27

-10

19

-77

-26

-23

-21

-45

-24

-26

-19

-37

-27

-38

-26

-41

-16

-33

-29

-32

-37

27

-55

-15

-11

69

62

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 203

 249

 249

 248

 246

 252

 250

 250

 249

 248

 245

 252

 250

 248

 249

 250

 249

 248

 247

 245

 250

 249

 140

 101

 67

 20

OUTLET

 9

 8

 9

 8

 7

 5

 4

 4

 5

 7

 5

 8

 8

 8

 7

 5

 4

 5

 4

 3

 3

 3

 4

 5

 4

 4

 3

 2

 1

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .29

 .25

 .29

 .26

 .22

 .16

 .15

 .12

 .18

 .24

 .19

 .27

 .29

 .29

 .27

 .17

 .15

 .19

 .16

 .14

 .13

 .13

 .15

 .23

 .16

 .18

 .14

 .09

 .05

 .09

 .09

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .57

 .14

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 RUN DATE: 11/16/2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -12.63 -345 5,879 0 156 5.72 .71

ACRE-FEET -12,630 -684 11,661 0 309

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 11,661

 11,661

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .71

JULY 1, 2001 .71

 28.59

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### Clifton Earl HUDSPETH v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 15424.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 28, 1955.

Jack Love, A. L. Wardlaw, Fort Worth, Tex., for appellant.

Lonny F. Zwiener, Asst. U. S. Atty., Austin, Tex., Russell B. Wine, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, JONES, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Convicted" of violating Section 661, Title 18, denouncing as an offender “whoever, within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United .States,1, takes and carries away, with intent to steal or purloin, any personal property of another”, defendant has appealed, assigning as his sole ground of error that the United States failed to .prove that the place where the taking ocr ■curred was within the.-“Special; Terrir .torial Jurisdiction of the United States”.

We think it quite clear that the assignment is without merit. Putting to one side the decision of this court in Brown v. United States, 5 Cir., 257 F.46, that if, as was the case here, the .place where the offense was committed was sufficiently described, the court will take judicial notice of facts which vest the United States with jurisdiction,2 the record overwhelmingly, indeed conclusively, establishes, the jurisdictional .facts.

The judgment is affirmed. •

1

. Section 7, Title 18 U.S.C. provides in part.

> “The term ‘special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States’, as used in this title, includes:

> “ * * * (3) ■ any lands reserved or acquired for the use of the United States, and under the exclusive or concurrent jurisdiction thereof, or any place purchased or otherwise acquired by the United States by the consent of the legislature of the State in which the same shall be, for the erection of a fort, magazine, arsenal, dock yard, or other needful building * *

2

. Cf. Holt v. United States, 218 U.S. 245, 31 S.Ct. 2, 54 L.Ed. 1021; and Jones v. United States, 137 U.S. 202, 11 S.Ct. 80, 34 L.Ed. 691.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4496 

To provide that amounts collected by the Federal Government through legal 

settlements, fines, or financial penalties shall be deposited in the general 

fund of the Treasury for purposes of deficit reduction, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2016 

Mr. SCHWEIKERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide that amounts collected by the Federal Government through legal settlements, fines, or financial penalties shall be deposited in the general fund of the Treasury for purposes of deficit reduction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Funding Unpaid Na5 tional Debt with Settlements Act’’ or the ‘‘FUNDS Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4496 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF LEGAL SETTLEMENT, FINES, OR FINANCIAL 

2 PENALTIES COLLECTED BY THE FEDERAL 

3 GOVERNMENT TO REDUCE THE DEBT. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, any covered funds shall be deposited in the 

6 general fund of the Treasury for purposes of deficit reduc7 tion. 

8 (b) DEFINITION OF COVERED FUNDS.—In this sec9 tion, the term ‘‘covered funds’’ means any civil penalty 

10 collected in a civil action brought by any Federal agency, 

11 any amounts received by a Federal agency in a settlement 

12 or consent decree entered in such an action, any fine levied 

13 in an administrative proceeding or pursuant to an agency 

14 rule, and any fine collected for any Federal criminal of15 fense, but does not include any penalty or interest col16 lected by the Internal Revenue Service under the Internal 

17 Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 703.213 Failure to comply.

The Office may suspend or revoke a carrier's certificate of authority to write LHWCA insurance under § 703.106 when the carrier fails to comply with any of the requirements of this part.
#### § 903.6 Fees.

Charges for copies of records made pursuant to part 903 of this chapter will be at the rate of $0.10 per copy. For records not susceptible to photocopying, e.g., over-size materials, photographs, etc., the amount charged will be the actual cost of copying. Only one copy of each record requested will be provided. No charge will be made unless the charge as computed above would exceed $3 for each request or related series of requests. If a fee in excess of $25 is required, the requester will be notified that the fee must be tendered before the records will be copied.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Elzie Jones, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-231;

Second District —

July 18, 1973.

*Rehearing denied September 6,1973.*

Ralph Ruebner, of Defender Project, of Elgin, for appellant.

Gerry L. Dondanville, State’s Attorney, of Geneva, (Clarence Wittenstrom, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE SEIDENFELD.
§ 725.360 Parties to proceedings. ( a ) Except as provided in § 725.361, no person other than the Secretary of Labor and authorized personnel of the Department of Labor shall participate at any stage in the adjudication of a claim for benefits under this part, unless such person is determined by the appropriate adjudication officer to qualify under the provisions of this section as a party to the claim. The following persons shall be parties: ( 1 ) The claimant;
( 2 ) A person other than a claimant, authorized to execute a claim on such claimant's behalf under § 725.301;
( 3 ) Any coal mine operator notified under § 725.407 of its possible liability for the claim;
( 4 ) Any insurance carrier of such operator; and
( 5 ) The Director in all proceedings relating to a claim for benefits under this part.
( b ) A widow, child, parent, brother, or sister, or the representative of a decedent's estate, who makes a showing in writing that his or her rights with respect to benefits may be prejudiced by a decision of an adjudication officer, may be made a party.
( c ) Any coal mine operator or prior operator or insurance carrier which has not been notified under § 725.407 and which makes a showing in writing that its rights may be prejudiced by a decision of an adjudication officer may be made a party.
( d ) Any other individual may be made a party if that individual's rights with respect to benefits may be prejudiced by a decision to be made.