alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 455 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 455

  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a northern 
            border threat analysis, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 21, 2015

Mr. Katko (for himself, Mr. King of New York, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, 
 and Mr. Higgins) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to conduct a northern 
            border threat analysis, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Northern Border Security Review 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NORTHERN BORDER THREAT ANALYSIS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than six months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit 
to the appropriate congressional committees a northern border threat 
analysis. Such analysis, at a minimum, shall include the following:
            (1) An analysis of current and potential terrorism threats 
        posed by individuals seeking to enter the United States through 
        the northern border.
            (2) An analysis of improvements needed at ports of entry 
        along the northern border to prevent terrorists and instruments 
        of terror from entering the United States.
            (3) An analysis of gaps in law, policy, international 
        agreements, or tribal agreements that hinder the border 
        security and counterterrorism efforts along the northern 
        border.
            (4) An analysis of illegal cross border activity between 
        ports of entry, including the maritime borders of the Great 
        Lakes.
    (b) Classified Threat Analysis.--The threat analysis required under 
subsection (a) may be submitted in classified form, if the Secretary of 
Homeland Security determines that such is appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
#### Nancy Adams, Respondent, v. The Missouri Pacific Railway Co., Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

July 6, 1885.

Reversed. — This case is in all respects, like the case between the same parties, *decided at the present term (ante,*p. 373); and for the reasons given in that case the judgment will be reversed.

Appeal from Randolph Circuit Court, Hon. G-eo. H. Burcki-iartt, J.

*Reversed and remanded.*

Adams & Bowles, for the appellant.

No brief on file for the respondent.

Opinion by

Ellison, J.

This case is in all respects like the case between the-same parties decided at the present term *(ante,*p. 373),. *647and for the reasons given in that case the judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded, to be proceeded with as is directed in that case.

All concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Watson & Taylor Ltd.-2
                    and is qualified in its entirety by
                    reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>                           0000737296
<NAME>                          P-B Watson & Taylor Ltd.-2
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          999,776

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   6,815

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,006,591

<PP&E>                          1,518,521

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,525,112

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           338,711

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      2,186,401

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,525,112

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0<F1>

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0<F1>

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0<F1>

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
<FN>
<F1>
Registrant adopted the liquidation basis of accounting 
on October 1, 1996, and, accordingly, does not reflect
Statement of Operations subsequent to 1996. See Note A
to the financial statements for further details.
</FN>

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh Energy Density Regenerative Fuel Cell Systems for Terrestrial ApplicationsRegenerative Fuel Cell System (RFCS) technology for energy storage has been a NASA power system concept for many years. Compared to battery-based energy storage systems, RFCS has received relatively little attention or resources for development because the energy density and electrical efficiency were not sufficiently attractive relative to advanced battery systems. Even today, RFCS remains at a very low technology readiness level (TRL of about 2 indicating feasibility has been demonstrated). Commercial development of the Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) fuel cells for automobiles and other terrestrial applications and improvements in lightweight pressure vessel design to reduce weight and improve performance make possible a high energy density RFCS energy storage system. The results from this study of a lightweight RFCS energy storage system for a remotely piloted, solar-powered, high altitude aircraft indicate an energy density up to 790 w-h/kg with electrical efficiency of 53.4% is attainable. Such an energy storage system would allow a solar-powered aircraft to carry hundreds of kilograms of payload and remain in flight indefinitely for use in atmospheric research, earth observation, resource mapping. and telecommunications. Future developments in the areas of hydrogen and oxygen storage, pressure vessel design, higher temperature and higher- pressure fuel cell operation, unitized regenerative fuel cells, and commercial development of fuel cell technology will improve both the energy density and electrical efficiency of the RFCS.Document ID19990063763Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsBurke, Kenneth A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1999Subject CategoryEnergy Production And ConversionReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1999-209429NAS 1.15:209429SAE-99-01-2600E-11841Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion EngineeringLocation: Vancouver, British ColumbiaCountry: CanadaStart Date: August 1, 1999End Date: August 5, 1999Sponsors:Society of Automotive EngineersFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 529-10-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990063763.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
550
          California Street, 12th Floor
 San Francisco,
          CA  94104
 Tel
          415-835-9200
 Fax
          415-391-2949
  **GMAC
          Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.**
 **Series
          2005-C1**
 **Annual
          Statement as to Compliance**
 **For
          Period of June 01, 2005 through December 31, 2005**
   Pursuant
          to section 3.13 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, I attest
          that;
  (i.)        A
          review of the activities of GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special Servicer
          during
          the period, and of its performance under this Agreement, has been made under
          my supervision.
  (ii.)      
          To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, GMAC Commercial Mortgage
          as Special Servicer, has fulfilled in all material respects its obligations under this Agreement throughout the period. However, during the period of June
          1,
          2005 through December 31, 2005,
          GMAC Commercial Mortgage as Special
          Servicer did not service any Specially Serviced Mortgaged Loans.
  (iii.) GMAC
          Commercial Mortgage as
          Special Servicer has received no notice regarding
          qualifications, or challenging the status, of the Trust Fund as a REMIC or
          of the
          Grantor Trust as a "grantor trust" under the Grantor Trust
          Provisions from the
          Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.
   BY:   
          /s/Michele Heisler   Date: 
          3/15/06
 Michele
          Heisler
 Vice
          President, GMAC
          Commercial Mortgage Corporation
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
to Registration Statement No. 333-42004, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
Registration Statement No. 33-67102, Registration Statement No. 333-16249,
Registration Statement No. 333-37445 and Registration Statement No. 333-82343 of
Herbalife International, Inc. all on Form S-8 of our report dated February 19,
2002, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Herbalife International,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.


March 26, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 97

 93

 90

 91

 89

 97

 95

 90

 96

 94

 92

 88

 87

 81

 80

 77

 77

 79

 79

 79

 75

 76

 75

 75

 74

 77

 78

 77

 77

 77

 78

 83

 76

 81

 79

 77

 79

 77

 79

 82

 77

 79

 76

 69

 71

 66

 68

 67

 65

 61

 65

 66

 56

 62

 61

 59

 51

 61

 61

 57

 64

 61

 89

 86

 85

 86

 85

 87

 85

 86

 86

 85

 86

 82

 80

 78

 77

 75

 75

 74

 75

 75

 73

 72

 71

 71

 71

 71

 73

 72

 71

 73

 73

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 19, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 161

 164

 168

 170

 169

 171

 177

 177

 183

 183

 183

 186

 193

 200

 204

 197

 193

 186

 186

 186

 182

 186

 186

 188

 184

 190

 190

 193

 191

 181

 188

 144

 142

 146

 152

 158

 159

 163

 168

 168

 164

 166

 171

 169

 175

 169

 173

 171

 144

 137

 120

 128

 139

 142

 149

 153

 156

 159

 153

 150

 157

 155

 153

 154

 158

 161

 164

 166

 169

 173

 174

 174

 176

 179

 182

 186

 187

 184

 183

 175

 170

 160

 159

 162

 165

 168

 169

 171

 173

 171

 171

 170

 174

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 15, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 129.21

 128.95

 129.01

 129.30

 129.55

 129.34

 129.14

 128.98

 128.80

 129.06

 129.53

 129.41

 129.22

 129.20

 129.39

 129.54

 129.77

 130.42

 130.20

 129.48

 129.16

 130.37

 129.51

 128.70

 127.91

 128.63

 129.26

 129.32

 129.55

 130.00

 129.92

 504

 481

 486

 512

 536

 516

 498

 483

 467

 490

 534

 523

 505

 503

 521

 535

 557

 625

 601

 529

 499

 620

 532

 458

 394

 452

 508

 514

 536

 581

 572

STORAGE

-23

-23

+5

+26

+24

-20

-18

-15

-16

+23

+44

-11

-18

-2

+18

+14

+22

+68

-24

-72

-30

+121

-88

-74

-64

+58

+56

+6

+22

+45

-9

CHANGE

61

63

78

78

65

57

63

67

67

91

102

69

58

64

74

72

76

94

43

33

67

146

41

48

53

114

113

337

92

351

3,075

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 278

 25

 268

 3,058

PUTAH

 47

 50

 50

 40

 28

 42

 47

 50

 50

 54

 55

 50

 42

 40

 40

 40

 40

 35

 30

 44

 57

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 56

 56

 60

 22

PUTAH

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .31

 .03

 .08

 .13

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .05

 .08

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .04

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .04

 .00

 .06

 .03

 .00

INCHES

 .31

 1.03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 2.30

 1.76

 .01

 .55

 .48

 .47

 .02

 .04

 .65

 .00

 1.34

 .27

 .24

 5.10

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

DECEMBER 2005 RUN DATE: 03/14/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +45 5,812 1,485 4,304 1 1.24 14.58

ACRE-FEET +45 11,528 2,945 8,537 2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 8,537

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,945

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 14.58

JULY 1, 2005 16.23

 527

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 839.70

 839.50

 839.21

 838.90

 838.56

 838.23

 838.59

 839.87

 840.27

 840.07

 839.84

 839.75

 839.63

 839.88

 839.94

 839.93

 839.98

 839.91

 839.80

 839.65

 839.60

 839.46

 839.28

 839.00

 838.70

 838.36

 838.50

 838.70

 838.81

 838.90

 48.71

 48.46

 48.09

 47.70

 47.27

 46.86

 47.31

 48.93

 49.44

 49.18

 48.89

 48.78

 48.62

 48.94

 49.02

 49.00

 49.07

 48.98

 48.83

 48.65

 48.58

 48.41

 48.18

 47.82

 47.45

 47.02

 47.19

 47.45

 47.58

 47.70

STORAGE

-0.28

-0.25

-0.37

-0.39

-0.43

-0.41

+0.45

+1.62

+0.51

-0.26

-0.30

-0.11

-0.15

+0.32

+0.08

-0.01

+0.06

-0.09

-0.15

-0.19

-0.06

-0.18

-0.23

-0.35

-0.38

-0.43

+0.18

+0.25

+0.14

+0.11

CHANGE

499

510

456

442

423

430

877

1,469

1,115

910

821

819

745

804

679

634

668

594

569

546

611

554

535

474

462

436

410

464

409

395

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 236

 418

 350

 257

 200

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 612

 612

 612

 612

 612

 612

 630

 627

 617

 617

 617

 617

 617

 617

 616

 616

 616

 616

 616

 616

 616

 616

 625

 625

 625

 625

 296

 309

 309

 309

OUTLET

 9

 6

 11

 7

 6

 6

 0

 5

 4

 4

 3

 2

 5

 6

 5

 5

 0

 3

 6

 4

 7

 8

 5

 7

 8

 6

 6

 8

 10

 9

C.F.S.

 .22

 .15

 .27

 .17

 .14

 .16

 .00

 .12

 .09

 .11

 .08

 .06

 .13

 .14

 .13

 .12

 .01

 .08

 .15

 .10

 .18

 .20

 .13

 .18

 .19

 .15

 .15

 .20

 .25

 .22

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 1.30

 .03

 .04

 .00

 .05

 .13

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 RUN DATE: 06/14/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.30 18,760 17,282 1,961 171 4.28 1.83

ACRE-FEET -1,300 37,210 34,279 3,890 339

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 3,890

OUTLET

TOTAL

 34,279

 38,169

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.83

JULY 1, 2016 26.42

 48.99

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 26.42
#### Bernard Abrams et al., on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Stockholders of Remington Rand, Inc., Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Theodore F. Allen et al., Defendants, and James G. Blaine et al., Defendants-Respondents.

*836Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Untermyer, J.

(dissenting). Although the complaint is replete with irrelevant allegations it contains, I think, a sufficient statement of facts in the third cause of action to require a trial of the issues. It is alleged that the option price to the defendant Band and others was reduced from twenty-five dollars to fifteen dollars per share without any consideration to the corporation. The circumstance that, at the time of the giving of the options and at the time of the reduction, the value of the stock was less than the option price is not decisive. An option to purchase stock may be of great speculative value, especially if it endures for a long term, even though the option price is greater than the value of the stock at the time the option is given. Surely, an option to purchase such stock at fifteen dollars per share is more valuable than an option at twenty-five dollars per share.

The order [granting motion for summary judgment dismissing second cause of action in the amended complaint] should be affirmed.

The order [granting motion to dismiss third cause of action in the amended complaint] should be reversed and the motion denied.
### §1167. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–117, §7, Oct. 31, 1967, 81 Stat. 338, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Contact Person for More Information:

Jean A. Webb, 202-418-5100.

Jean A. Webb,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 04-21349  Filed 9-20-04; 10:24 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
§ 684.430 What individuals are eligible to receive supplemental youth services? ( a ) Participants in supplemental youth services activities must be: ( 1 ) American Indian, Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian as determined by the INA program grantee according to § 684.300(a);
( 2 ) Between the age of 14 and 24; and
( 3 ) A low-income individual as defined at WIOA sec. 3(36) except up to five percent of the participants during a program year in an INA youth program may not be low-income individuals provided they meet the eligibility requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
( b ) For the purpose of this section, the term “low-income,” used with respect to an individual, also includes a youth living in a high-poverty area.
#### § 366.1 Notification to Internal Revenue Service.

Upon entering into an agreement with the Internal Revenue Service and the Financial Management Service with regard to its participation in the tax refund offset program, the Board may notify the Internal Revenue Service, pursuant to the terms of such agreement, of past-due legally enforceable debts owed to the Board that are to be collected by tax refund offset. The Board's notification to the Internal Revenue Service will be as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service in regard to information included and format, and will be made by such dates as prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Board will provide the Internal Revenue Service with a toll-free or collect telephone number which the Internal Revenue Service may furnish to debtors whose refunds have been offset for use in obtaining information from the Board concerning the offset.

[54 FR 397, Jan. 6, 1989, as amended at 60 FR 66073, Dec. 21, 1995]
Exhibit 99.2

 

**Independent Accountant’sReport**

 

Synthetic Fixed-IncomeSecurities, Inc. (as Depositor) 

One Wells Fargo Center 

301 South CollegeStreet 

Charlotte, NC 28288

 

U.S. Bank Trust NationalAssociation (as Trustee) 

Corporate Trust Department 

100 Wall Street 

New York, NY 10005

 

Re:	STRATS Trust For GoldmanSachs Capital I Securities, Series 2005-1 (the “Trust”)	

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have examined assertions ofSynthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the “Depositor”) and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, (the “Trustee”and together with the Depositor, the “Management”) that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all materialrespects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement dated as of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplementdated as of June 13, 2005 (together, the “Trust Agreement”), in respect of the STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs CapitalI Securities, Series 2005-1 (the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by theDepositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”). Management is responsiblefor compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based onour examination.

 

Our examination was made in accordancewith attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performingsuch other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the Depositor andthe Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report andManagement’s assertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December31, 2014.

 

/s/ Aston Bell, CPA

 

New York, New York 

March 18, 2015