Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2012 / Notices 25685 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene retail carrier bags from 

Thailand. See Initiation of Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocations in 

Part, 76 FR 61076 (October 3, 2011). 

Based on a request for review from the 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bag 

Committee and its individual members, 

Hilex Poly Co., LLC and Superbag 

Corporation (collectively, the 

petitioners), we initiated a review of 

Apple Film Company, Ltd., First Pack 

Co. Ltd., Hi-Pak Company, Ltd., K 

International Packaging Co., Ltd., 

Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Multibax 

Public Co., Ltd., Praise Home Industry, 

Co. Ltd., Siam Flexible Industries Co. 

Ltd., Sombatchai Plastic Industry, Ltd., 

Thai Jirun Co., Ltd., Trinity Pac Co. Ltd., 

T.S.T. Plaspack Co., Ltd., and U. Yong 

Industry Co., Ltd. Id. No other party 

requested a review. 

Rescission of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), the Department will 

rescind an administrative review, ‘‘in 

whole or in part, if a party that 

requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of notice of initiation of the 

requested review. The Secretary may 

extend this time limit if the Secretary 

decides that it is reasonable to do so.’’ 

On October 17, 2011, the petitioners 

withdrew their request for a review of 

the order with respect to First Pack Co. 

Ltd., K International Packaging Co., Ltd., 

Landblue (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Praise 

Home Industry, Co. Ltd., Siam Flexible 

Industries Co., Ltd., Thai Jirun Co., Ltd., 

and U. Yong Industry Co., Ltd. On 

December 23, 2011, the petitioners 

requested we extend the 90-day time 

limit for the withdrawal of the request 

for a review. On December 28, 2011, we 

extended the time limit for the 

withdrawal of the request for the review 

until February 29, 2012, based on the 

extraordinary circumstances leading to 

their request. On February 21, 2012, the 

petitioners withdrew their request for a 

review of the order with respect to 

Apple Film Company, Ltd., Hi-Pack 

Company, Ltd., Multibax Public Co., 

Ltd., Sombatchai Plastic Industry, Ltd., 

Trinity Pac Co. Ltd., and T.S.T. Plaspack 

Co., Ltd. Because we received no other 

requests for review of these companies 

and the petitioners withdrew their 

request within the extended time limit 

for the withdrawal of the request for a 

review, we are rescinding the 

administrative review of the order with 

respect to all companies. This rescission 

is in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1). The Department intends 

to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection within 15 days after 

publication of this notice. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305(a)(3). Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 26, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10452 Filed 4–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality 

Award Panel of Judges 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app., 

notice is hereby given that there will be 

a meeting of the Panel of Judges of the 

Malcolm Baldrige National Quality 

Award on Wednesday, June 13, 2012. 

The Panel of Judges is composed of 

twelve members prominent in the fields 

of quality, innovation, and performance 

management and appointed by the 

Secretary of Commerce, assembled to 

ensure the integrity of the Baldrige 

Award selection process. The purpose 

of this meeting is to discuss and review 

information received from the National 

Institute of Standards and Technology 

and from the Chair of the Judges Panel 

of the Malcolm Baldrige National 

Quality Award. The agenda will 

include: Overview of the Role of the 

Judges and Scoring Data Reviewed at 

the September 2011 Meeting, 2012 

Baldrige Award Cycle, Conflict of 

Interest, Judges’ Survey of Applicants, 

Judging Process Improvement 

Discussion and Judges’ Mentoring 

Program, and a Baldrige Program 

Update. 

DATES: The meeting will convene on 

Wednesday, June 13, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. 

Eastern time and adjourn at 4:00 p.m. 

Eastern time. The entire meeting will be 

closed. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 

the National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, Administration Building, 

Lecture Room E, Gaithersburg, 

Maryland 20899. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Harry Hertz, Director, Baldrige 

Performance Excellence Program, 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 

20899, telephone number (301) 975– 

2361. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Assistant Secretary for Administration, 

with the concurrence of the General 

Counsel, formally determined on March 

7, 2011, that the meeting of the Judges 

Panel may be closed in accordance with 

5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) because the meeting 

is likely to disclose trade secrets and 

commercial or financial information 

obtained from a person which is 

privileged or confidential and 5 U.S.C. 

552b(c)(9)(B) because for a government 

agency the meetings are likely to 

disclose information that could 

significantly frustrate implementation of 

a proposed agency action. The meeting, 

which involves examination of Award 

applicant data from U.S. companies and 

other organizations and a discussion of 

these data as compared to the Award 

criteria in order to recommend Award 

recipients, will be closed to the public. 

Dated: April 24, 2012. 

Phillip Singerman, 

Associate Director for Innovation & Industry 

Services. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10438 Filed 4–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES