alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:****Estimates of the legal permanent residentpopulation and population eligible to naturalize in ...
**2002; 2003; 2004**

 
SuDoc:HS 1.15/2:L 52//
Item Number:0520-B-50 (online)
CGP system Number:001024767
 
 **
### §1081. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–655, §1, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 905, which related to division of judgment funds on the basis of tribal membership rolls and advances or expenditures from tribal funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §1300c–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–468, §3, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 782, which related to preparation of tribal membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 900.7 Delegations of authority.

As occasion warrants, the Joint Board may delegate functions to the Chairman or the Executive Director, including the authority to receive applications and to give notice of actions. Any such delegation of authority is conferred by resolution of the Board.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3969 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3969

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
  outpatient clinic in Laughlin, Nevada, as the ``Master Chief Petty 
                    Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER JESSE DEAN VA CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The Department of Veterans Affairs community-
based outpatient clinic in Laughlin, Nevada, shall after the date of 
the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Master Chief 
Petty Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the community-based 
outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the ``Master Chief Petty Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3969

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based 
  outpatient clinic in Laughlin, Nevada, as the ``Master Chief Petty 
                    Officer Jesse Dean VA Clinic''.
```
### §283z–2. Contribution to Inter-American Development Bank; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized on behalf of the United States to contribute to the Fund for Special Operations $70,000,000: Provided, however, That any commitment to make such contribution shall be made subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

(b) In order to pay for a portion of the increase in the United States subscription to the capital stock of the Bank provided for in section 283z–1(a) of this title and for the United States contribution to the Fund for Special Operations provided for in this section, there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury, (1) $274,920,799 for the United States subscription, and (2) $70,000,000 for the United States contribution to the Fund for Special Operations: Provided, however, That no funds may be made available for such contribution to the Fund for Special Operations for the fiscal year 1982.

(Pub. L. 86–147, §30, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1351(a), Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 744.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 13, 1981, except that any funds authorized to be appropriated shall not be available for use or obligation prior to Oct. 1, 1981, see section 1372 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 290i of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        3,062
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2,747
<ALLOWANCES>                                  714
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3,125
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         25
<BONDS>                                       2,410
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    7,661
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10,616
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              617
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            131
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               106
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           106
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  106
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 2.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 2.74
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 129.62

 130.23

 130.40

 129.86

 129.29

 129.24

 129.71

 130.10

 129.88

 129.54

 129.62

 129.67

 129.73

 129.82

 129.75

 129.71

 129.75

 130.65

 130.01

 130.36

 130.44

 130.39

 130.33

 130.29

 130.64

 130.67

 130.14

 130.19

 543

 604

 623

 566

 511

 507

 552

 591

 568

 535

 543

 548

 554

 562

 556

 552

 556

 650

 582

 619

 627

 622

 615

 611

 649

 652

 595

 600

STORAGE

+10

+61

+19

-57

-55

-4

+45

+39

-23

-33

+8

+5

+6

+8

-6

-4

+4

+94

-68

+37

+8

-5

-7

-4

+38

+3

-57

+5

CHANGE

94

121

99

64

66

93

122

118

83

78

97

96

96

96

88

168

330

171

154

105

94

85

80

75

342

110

46

79

INFLOW

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 28

 28

 28

 27

 26

 102

 278

 73

 119

 26

 26

 23

 21

 21

 300

 53

 29

 25

PUTAH

 60

 60

 60

 64

 65

 65

 69

 68

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 68

 50

 51

 69

 60

 64

 65

 63

 56

 23

 55

 46

 51

PUTAH

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .04

 .25

 .14

 .06

 .07

 .27

 .23

 .23

 .28

 .20

 .08

 .09

 .09

 .08

 .04

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .07

 .13

 .00

 .12

 .09

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .58

 .83

 1.31

 1.02

 .90

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.33

 .07

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 RUN DATE: 04/04/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +67 3,250 1,687 1,523 6 2.86 6.19

ACRE-FEET +67 6,446 3,346 3,021 12

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,021

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,346

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.19

JULY 1, 2010 19.52

 533

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §1300. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–461, §1, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 768, which related to distribution of judgment funds and payment of attorney fees and expenses, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      James
      G. Reindl, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2007,
      of Techprecision Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated: September 20, 2007
            
            /s/ James G. ReindlJames
              G. ReindlChief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 715.99

 717.57

 718.96

 720.19

 719.94

 720.98

 721.94

 722.76

 723.56

 724.30

 724.98

 725.61

 726.17

 723.68

 724.23

 724.82

 725.34

 725.95

 726.45

 726.90

 727.33

 727.74

 728.11

 728.44

 728.74

 729.04

 729.34

 729.70

 730.06

 730.38

 730.68

 1,048

 1,100

 1,149

 1,193

 1,184

 1,221

 1,257

 1,287

 1,317

 1,346

 1,372

 1,397

 1,419

 1,322

 1,343

 1,366

 1,386

 1,410

 1,430

 1,448

 1,466

 1,482

 1,498

 1,511

 1,523

 1,536

 1,548

 1,563

 1,579

 1,592

 1,605

STORAGE

+62

+52

+49

+44

-9

+37

+36

+30

+30

+29

+26

+25

+22

-97

+21

+23

+20

+24

+20

+18

+18

+16

+16

+13

+12

+13

+12

+15

+16

+13

+13

CHANGE

31

26

25

22

14

19

18

15

15

15

13

13

11

3

11

12

10

12

10

9

9

8

8

7

6

7

6

8

8

7

7

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 19

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 52

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2015 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 1, 2015

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +619 385 0 71

ACRE-FEET +619 764 0 141

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 141

 141

 986

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
### §318. Highway relocation due to airport

Federal highway funds shall not be used for the reconstruction or relocation of any highway giving access to an airport constructed or extended after December 20, 1944, or for the reconstruction or relocation of any highway which has been or may be closed or the usefulness of which has been may be impaired by the location or construction of any airport constructed or extended after December 20, 1944, unless, prior to such construction or extension, as the case may be, the State transportation department and the Secretary have concurred with the officials in charge of the airport that the location of such airport or extension thereof and the consequent reconstruction or relocation of the highway are in the public interest.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 916; Pub. L. 105–178, title I, §1212(a)(2)(A)(i), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 193.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–178 substituted "State transportation department" for "State highway department".
#### Morris J. Solomon, Appellant, v. The Bank of New York, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to serve amended complaint on payment of costs in this court and in the court below. Ho opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Manuel HERNANDEZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40169.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

*208James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, US Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Manuel Hernandez-Gonzalez (Hernandez) pleaded guilty without the benefit of a plea agreement to reentry into the United States following deportation. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b).

Hernandez argues for the first time on appeal that the district court erred in ordering him to cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample as a condition of supervised release and that this condition should therefore be vacated. Hernandez’s claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it is not ripe for review. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

Hernandez also challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b). His constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Hernandez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Hernandez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *AlmendarezTorres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 680.150 What career services must be provided to adults and dislocated workers? ( a ) At a minimum, all of the basic career services described in WIOA secs. 134(c)(2)(A)(i)-(xi) and § 678.430(a) of this chapter must be provided in each local area through the one-stop delivery system.
( b ) Individualized career services described in WIOA sec. 134(c)(2)(A)(xii) and § 678.430(b) of this chapter must be made available, if determined appropriate in order for an individual to obtain or retain employment.
( c ) Follow-up services, as described in WIOA sec. 134(c)(2)(A)(xiii) and § 678.430(c) of this chapter, must be made available, as determined appropriate by the Local WDB, for a minimum of 12 months following the first day of employment, to participants who are placed in unsubsidized employment.
### §8006. MTCR adherent status

Congress finds that India is not an MTCR adherent for the purposes of section 2797b of this title.

(Pub. L. 109–401, title I, §107, Dec. 18, 2006, 120 Stat. 2738.)
#### In the Matter of Bond and Mortgage Guarantee Company (Boardwalk, between West 11th St. and West 12th St., Coney Island, New York.— Guarantee No. 171,050). John G. Ward et al., as Executors and Trustees of William J. Ward, Deceased, Appellants; Lafayette National Bank of Brooklyn in New York, as Trustee for Certificate Holders, et al., Respon*877dents.

Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs on the authority of *Brighton Operating Corp.*v. *Morrison*(262 App. Div. 895) and *Hammond*v. *Lawrence Investing Co., Inc.*(262 App. Div. 900), adhering, however, to his opinion expressed in the dissents in those cases. [See *post,*pp. 922, 978.]
§ 11.42 How does the authorized official apply the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE? ( a ) The authorized official must perform a preliminary application of the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE with the data inputs and modifications developed under § 11.41. Volume II of the NRDAM/CME technical document (incorporated by reference, see § 11.18) describes how to apply the NRDAM/CME. Volume II of the NRDAM/GLE technical document (incorporated by reference, see § 11.18) describes how to apply the NRDAM/GLE. For cases involving releases of two or more substances or a release of a mixture of substances, the authorized official may only apply the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE once using only one of the substances.
( b ) If the preliminary application of the NRDAM/CME or NRDAM/GLE indicates damages in excess of $100,000, then the authorized official must decide whether to: ( 1 ) Limit the portion of his or her claim calculated with the type A procedure to $100,000; or
( 2 ) Compute all damages using type B procedures.
[61 FR 20611, May 7, 1996]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Role of Multiphysics Simulation in Multidisciplinary AnalysisThis article describes the applications of the Spectrum(Tm) Solver in Multidisciplinary Analysis (MDA). Spectrum, a multiphysics simulation software based on the finite element method, addresses compressible and incompressible fluid flow, structural, and thermal modeling as well as the interaction between these disciplines. Multiphysics simulation is based on a single computational framework for the modeling of multiple interacting physical phenomena. Interaction constraints are enforced in a fully-coupled manner using the augmented-Lagrangian method. Within the multiphysics framework, the finite element treatment of fluids is based on Galerkin-Least-Squares (GLS) method with discontinuity capturing operators. The arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian method is utilized to account for deformable fluid domains. The finite element treatment of solids and structures is based on the Hu-Washizu variational principle. The multiphysics architecture lends itself naturally to high-performance parallel computing. Aeroelastic, propulsion, thermal management and manufacturing applications are presented.Document ID19980236869Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsRifai, Steven M.*(Centric Engineering Systems, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA United States)*Ferencz, Robert M.*(Centric Engineering Systems, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA United States)*Wang, Wen-Ping*(Centric Engineering Systems, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA United States)*Spyropoulos, Evangelos T.*(Centric Engineering Systems, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA United States)*Lawrence, Charles*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Melis, Matthew E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1998Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberE-11373AIAA Paper 98-4863NASA/TM-1998-208653NAS 1.15:208653Meeting InformationMeeting: Multidisciplinary Analysis and OptimizationLocation: Saint Louis, MOCountry: United StatesStart Date: September 2, 1998End Date: September 4, 1998Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 509-10-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980236869.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024