alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 686.1040 What information will be collected for use in the Annual Report? The Secretary will collect and submit in the Annual Report described in sec. 159(c)(4) of WIOA, which will include the following information on each Job Corps center, and the Job Corps program as a whole: ( a ) Information on the performance, based on the performance indicators described § 686.1010, as compared to the expected level of performance established under § 686.1050 for each performance indicator;
( b ) Information on the performance of outreach service providers and career transition service providers on the performance indicators established under §§ 686.1020 and 686.1030, as compared to the expected levels of performance established under § 686.1050 for each of those indicators;
( c ) The number of enrollees served;
( d ) Demographic information on the enrollees served, including age, race, gender, and education and income level;
( e ) The number of graduates of a Job Corps center;
( f ) The number of graduates who entered the Armed Forces;
( g ) The number of graduates who entered registered apprenticeship programs;
( h ) The number of graduates who received a regular secondary school diploma;
( i ) The number of graduates who received a State recognized equivalent of a secondary school diploma;
( j ) The number of graduates who entered unsubsidized employment related to the career technical training received through the Job Corps program and the number who entered unsubsidized employment not related to the education and training received;
( k ) The percentage and number of former enrollees, including the number dismissed under the zero tolerance policy described in § 686.545;
( l ) The percentage and number of graduates who enter postsecondary education;
( m ) The average wage of graduates who enter unsubsidized employment: ( 1 ) On the first day of such employment; and
( 2 ) On the day that is 6 months after such first day;
( n ) The maximum attainable percent of enrollees at a Job Corps center that reside in the State in which the center is located, and the maximum attainable percentage of enrollees at a Job Corps center that reside in the State in which the center is located and in surrounding regions, as compared to the percentage targets established by the Secretary for the center for each of those measures;
( o ) The cost per enrollee, which is calculated by comparing the number of enrollees at the center in a program year to the total budget for such center in the same program year;
( p ) The cost per graduate, which is calculated by comparing the number of graduates of the center in a program year compared to the total budget for such center in the same program year;
( q ) Information regarding the state of Job Corps buildings and facilities, including a review of requested construction, rehabilitation, and acquisition projects, by each Job Corps center, and a review of new facilities under construction;
( r ) Available information regarding the national and community service activities of enrollees, particularly those enrollees at Civilian Conservation Centers; and
( s ) Any additional information required by the Secretary.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 423 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the care provided by 

the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to newborn children. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 21, 2015 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and Mr. 

VALADAO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

care provided by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to 

newborn children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Newborn Care Im5 provement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF CARE PROVIDED TO NEWBORN 

7 CHILDREN. 

8 Section 1786 of title 38, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 423 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘seven days’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘14 days’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 section: 

5 ‘‘(c) ANNUAL REPORT.—Not later than October 31 

6 of each year, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees 

7 on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representatives and 

8 the Senate a report on the health care services provided 

9 under subsection (a) during the fiscal year preceding the 

10 date of the report, including the number of newborn chil11 dren who received such services during such fiscal year.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 16.2 Applications for helium disposition agreements.

The application for a helium disposition agreement need not be in any particular form, but must contain information sufficient to enable the Secretary to determine that the proposal will conserve helium that will otherwise be wasted, drained, or lost to Federal ownership or use, and to evaluate the suitability of the proposal.

[30 FR 9219, July 23, 1965]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0352

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

GARREN DOUGLAS SEAL,

 Defendant and Appellant,

 

 ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an 

extension of time to and including December 11, 2023, within 

which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on 

appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 13 2023

11/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0352
### §1202. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–283, §2, June 19, 1970, 84 Stat. 313, which related to determination of per capita shares, reversion of denied shares to the tribe, and use of reverted funds, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §808. Repealed. Pub. L. 92–310, title II, §227(c), June 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 207

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title X, §1011, 60 Stat. 1030, related to bonds of officers and employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Impairment of Existing Bonds

Act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1121, 60 Stat. 1035, which related to impairment of existing bonds by enactment of this chapter, was repealed by Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159.
Court of Appeals for the

First District of Texas at Houston

**Order Reinstating Appeal and**

**Establishing Briefing Schedule**

Appellate case name:  Dinesh Kumar Shah v. The State of Texas 

Appellate case number:  01-10-01138-CR

Trial court case number: 1040406

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County, Texas

On March 8, 2012, the Court abated this appeal and remanded the case to the trial court for a determination of whether retained attorney, Dennis Hester, should be permitted to substitute for court-appointed attorney, Ted Doebbler, as counsel for appellant. The trial court conducted a hearing on April 18, 2012, at which the trial court (1) determined Dennis Hester should be permitted to substitute as counsel for appellant and (2) relieved Ted Doebbler of his duties as court-appointed counsel. 

This case is **reinstated**. The Clerk of this Court is instructed to update this Court’s records to reflect that Dennis Hester is appellant’s counsel of record on appeal. 

Appellant’s “Motion to Withdraw *Anders* Brief and for Court to Instate Briefing Deadlines” is **granted**. Appellant’s brief is due **Monday, July 30, 2012**. Absent a showing of good cause, no extension of this deadline will be granted. Appellee’s brief is due **Wednesday, August 29, 2012.**

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: **/s/ Justice Harvey G. Brown**

acting individually

Date: June 28, 2012

�
#### Francisca Lopez LEMUS, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76768.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Frank P. Sprouls, Esq., Law Office of Ricci and Sprouls, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, Mina Rhee, United States Attorney’s Office, Atlanta, GA, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Francisca Lopez-Lemus, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We review for substantial evidence, *Molina-Morales v. INS,*237 F.3d 1048, 1050 (9th Cir.2001), and we *245deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Lopez-Lemus was not eligible for asylum because she failed to show that her assault, the continued threats, and the abduction of her children, constituted persecution “on account of’ a political opinion imputed to her by the guerillas. *See Ochave v. INS,*254 F.3d 859, 865 (9th Cir.2001). Although LopezLemus’s fear of continued retribution by the guerillas may be genuine, she failed to offer any evidence that supports, much less compels, a conclusion that her assailants pursued her for any other reason than to silence a witness to their crime. *See Molina-Morales,*237 F.3d at 1052 (stating that personal retribution is not persecution on account of political opinion).

Even if Lopez-Lemus had been able to show that she was persecuted on account of a protected ground, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that changed country conditions in Guatemala undermine the petitioner’s fear of future persecution. *See Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 995, 998-99 (9th Cir. 2003) (holding that the State Department Country Report constituted substantial evidence to support the BIA’s finding of changed country conditions in Guatemala).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Lopez-Lemus’s contention that she is eligible for a special humanitarian grant of asylum based on the severity of her past persecution because Lopez-Lemus failed to exhaust that claim before the BIA. *See Barron v. Ashcroft,*358 F.3d 674, 676 (9th Cir .2004).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuanee of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
§ 688.370 What are the requirements for exit from the YouthBuild program? At a minimum, to be a successful exit, the Department of Labor requires that: ( a ) Participants receive hands-on construction training or hands-on training in another industry or occupation, in the case of Construction Plus grantees; and
( b ) Participants meet the exit policies established by the grantee. ( 1 ) Such policies must describe the program outcomes and/or individual goals that must be met by each participant in order to successfully complete the program; and
( 2 ) Grantees must apply the policies consistently to determine when a successful exit has occurred.
Exhibit 99.1



                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-24
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-24


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                        Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                        Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
§ 670.500 What services must Job Corps centers provide? ( a ) Job Corps centers must provide: ( 1 ) Academic, vocational, employability and social skills training;
( 2 ) Work-based learning; and
( 3 ) Recreation, counseling and other residential support services.
( b ) In addition, centers must provide students with access to the core services described in WIA section 134(d)(2) and the intensive services described in WIA section 134(d)(3).
### §8174. Report on efforts to promote the implementation of additional protocols

Not later than 180 days after the entry into force of the Additional Protocol, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on—

(1) measures that have been or should be taken to achieve the adoption of additional protocols to existing safeguards agreements signed by non-nuclear-weapon State Parties; and

(2) assistance that has been or should be provided by the United States to the IAEA in order to promote the effective implementation of additional protocols to existing safeguards agreements signed by non-nuclear-weapon State Parties and the verification of the compliance of such parties with IAEA obligations, with a plan for providing any needed additional funding.

(Pub. L. 109–401, title II, §274, Dec. 18, 2006, 120 Stat. 2752.)
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPrediction of Turbulent Temperature Fluctuations in Hot JetsLarge-eddy simulations were used to investigate turbulent temperature fluctuations and turbulent heat flux in hot jets. A high-resolution finite-difference Navier-Stokes solver, WRLES, was used to compute the flow from a 2-inch round nozzle. Several different flow conditions, consisting of different jet Mach numbers and temperature ratios, were examined. Predictions of mean and fluctuating velocities were compared to previously obtained particle image velocimetry data. Predictions of mean and fluctuating temperature were compared to new data obtained using Raman spectroscopy. Based on the good agreement with experimental data for the individual quantities, the combined quantity turbulent heat flux was examined.Document ID20170007295Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsDebonis, James R.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredAugust 3, 2017Publication DateJuly 1, 2017Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN44180AIAA Paper 2017-3610NASA/TM-2017-219531E-19388Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.01.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordslarge-eddy simulationsturbulent heat fluxhot jetsAvailable DownloadsNameType20170007295.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170008104See AlsoPrediction of Turbulent Temperature Fluctuations in Hot Jets20170007700See AlsoPrediction of Turbulent Temperature Fluctuations in Hot Jetsvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 173

 136

 134

 135

 145

 122

 114

 114

 114

 128

 110

 133

 120

 127

 121

 120

 121

 125

 119

 118

 117

 122

 111

 118

 101

 102

 110

 105

 109

 115

 135

 128

 121

 118

 110

 109

 98

 104

 102

 105

 100

 103

 107

 111

 107

 110

 114

 111

 111

 110

 99

 101

 102

 93

 84

 83

 82

 88

 91

 89

 146

 132

 126

 123

 120

 112

 108

 109

 107

 111

 105

 113

 113

 117

 114

 117

 118

 116

 115

 113

 112

 113

 107

 105

 91

 91

 93

 96

 99

 99

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 726.36

 727.12

 727.83

 728.48

 729.03

 729.53

 730.00

 730.42

 730.86

 731.28

 731.92

 732.50

 732.97

 733.42

 733.88

 734.34

 734.73

 735.07

 735.43

 735.72

 736.00

 736.37

 736.66

 736.93

 737.17

 737.44

 737.82

 738.04

 738.33

 738.64

 738.81

 1,426

 1,457

 1,486

 1,513

 1,535

 1,556

 1,576

 1,594

 1,612

 1,630

 1,658

 1,683

 1,704

 1,723

 1,744

 1,764

 1,782

 1,797

 1,814

 1,827

 1,840

 1,857

 1,870

 1,883

 1,894

 1,907

 1,925

 1,936

 1,950

 1,965

 1,973

STORAGE

+32

+31

+29

+27

+22

+21

+20

+18

+18

+18

+28

+25

+21

+19

+21

+20

+18

+15

+17

+13

+13

+17

+13

+13

+11

+13

+18

+11

+14

+15

+8

CHANGE

16

16

15

14

11

11

10

9

9

9

14

13

11

10

11

10

9

8

9

7

7

9

7

7

6

7

9

6

7

8

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +579 299 0 0

ACRE-FEET +579 593 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 1,394

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
### §9902. Report from each mission on matters of commercial relations

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after December 20, 2019, and annually thereafter, the chief of mission at each bilateral diplomatic mission of the United States and the Director of the American Institute in Taiwan shall submit to the Secretary of State mission plans that include the following:

(1) Data and other information regarding actions taken by each such mission or Institute during the previous year to foster commercial relations and safeguard United States economic and business interests in the country or region in which each such chief of mission and the Director serves.

(2) Each such mission's and Institute's anticipated economic and commercial priorities for the coming year.

#### (b) Report to Congress

The Secretary of State, after receiving the information required under subsection (a), shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate a report, disaggregated by country or region, on activities and initiatives, including with appropriate examples, to create an enabling environment and otherwise promote United States economic and business interests in each such country or region, as well as information about significant foreign competition to United States businesses in the relevant country or region, including state-directed investments by foreign governments and United States strategic competitors in such country or region.

(Pub. L. 116–94, div. J, title VII, §706, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3071.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 707.51

 708.65

 707.17

 708.32

 709.14

 707.15

 707.88

 707.41

 708.12

 708.64

 709.09

 707.17

 707.67

 708.14

 708.51

 707.31

 707.14

 710.13

 717.14

 717.30

 719.32

 721.89

 719.98

 716.04

 713.34

 718.38

 723.20

 731.46

 726.80

 737.52

 741.99

 791

 823

 782

 814

 837

 781

 802

 788

 808

 823

 836

 782

 796

 809

 819

 786

 781

 865

 1,086

 1,091

 1,162

 1,255

 1,185

 1,049

 962

 1,128

 1,304

 1,638

 1,444

 1,911

 2,130

STORAGE

-67

+32

-41

+32

+23

-56

+21

-14

+20

+15

+13

-54

+14

+13

+10

-33

-5

+84

+221

+5

+71

+93

-70

-136

-87

+166

+176

+334

-194

+467

+219

CHANGE

64

31

-6

17

13

-13

12

0

11

9

8

-14

8

7

5

-8

0

42

160

64

92

105

44

8

35

167

249

318

72

389

300

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 98

 15

 15

 1

 1

 15

 1

 7

 1

 1

 1

 13

 1

 0

 0

 9

 3

 0

 49

 61

 56

 58

 79

 77

 79

 83

 160

 150

 170

 154

 190

 1020

 1045

 1050

 1015

TIME

 .24

 .18

 .16

 .07

COPPER

 .79

 .64

 .57

 .23

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2005 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,272 2,189 0 1,548

ACRE-FEET +1,272 4,342 0 3,070

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,070

 3,070

 858

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .005

 .001

 .001

 .002

Table 7
#### Samuel Posner and Others, Copartners, etc., Respondents, v. Rudolph Lederer and Another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.