alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 432 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 to prevent 

duplicative regulation of advisers of small business investment companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 432 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘SBIC Advisers Relief 

3 Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ADVISERS OF SBICS AND VENTURE CAPITAL FUNDS. 

5 Section 203(l) of the Investment Advisers Act of 

6 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–3(l)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘No investment adviser’’ and in8 serting the following: 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No investment adviser’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(2) ADVISERS OF SBICS.—For purposes of this 

13 subsection, a venture capital fund includes an entity 

14 described in subparagraph (A), (B), or (C) of sub15 section (b)(7) (other than an entity that has elected 

16 to be regulated or is regulated as a business develop17 ment company pursuant to section 54 of the Invest18 ment Company Act of 1940).’’. 

19 SEC. 3. ADVISERS OF SBICS AND PRIVATE FUNDS. 

20 Section 203(m) of the Investment Advisers Act of 

21 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–3(m)) is amended by adding at the 

22 end the following: 

23 ‘‘(3) ADVISERS OF SBICS.—For purposes of this 

24 subsection, the assets under management of a pri25 vate fund that is an entity described in subpara26 graph (A), (B), or (C) of subsection (b)(7) (other 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 432 RFS

1 than an entity that has elected to be regulated or is 

2 regulated as a business development company pursu3 ant to section 54 of the Investment Company Act of 

4 1940) shall be excluded from the limit set forth in 

5 paragraph (1).’’. 

6 SEC. 4. RELATIONSHIP TO STATE LAW. 

7 Section 203A(b)(1) of the Investment Advisers Act 

8 of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80b–3a(b)(1)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

10 the end; 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

12 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(C) that is not registered under section 

15 203 because that person is exempt from reg16 istration as provided in subsection (b)(7) of 

17 such section, or is a supervised person of such 

18 person.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard H. De Voto, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Resources
Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)       the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September
         30, 2002, (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)       the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.







Date:  November 13, 2002                        /s/ Richard H. De Voto
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Richard H. De Voto
                                                Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

                    On April 24, 2012, at                     **Federal Register**                    /Vol. 77, No. 79, pages 24515-24516, notice was given that on April 16, 2012 a proposed Consent Decree (“Decree”) in                     *United States of America and the State of Tennessee*                     v.                     *the City of Memphis*                     (“City”), Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-02083-SHM-dkv was lodged with the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The Decree represents a settlement of claims against the City of Memphis under Section 301, 309, and 402 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1319, and 1342; and Tenn. Code Ann. Sections 69-3-108(b)(6), 114 and 115; and Sections 101 through 138 of the Tennessee Water Quality Control Act (“TWQCA”).                

                    The April 24, 2012 Notice did not contain the public comment email address. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 20044-7611, and either mailed to that address or emailed to                     *pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov*                     and should refer to                     *United States of America and State of Tennessee*                     v.                     *City of Memphis,*                     Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-02083-SHM-dkv, D.J. Ref. 90-5-1-1-09720.                

Henry Friedman,

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.

[FR Doc. 2012-10387 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Shirley MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-20451.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Samy K. Khalil, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Shirley Martinez, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396,18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Martinez has not filed a response to the motion. Our independent review of *329the brief and the record discloses no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsModel-Based Diagnosis in a Power Distribution Test-BedThe Rodon model-based diagnosis shell was applied to a breadboard test-bed, modeling an automated power distribution system. The constraint-based modeling paradigm and diagnostic algorithm were found to adequately represent the selected set of test scenarios.Document ID19980237350Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsScarl, E.*(Boeing Aerospace Co. Huntsville, AL United States)*McCall, K.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1998Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberM-898NASA/TM-1998-208804NAS 1.15:208804Funding Number(s)OTHER: EB01-BSDG-001Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980237350.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit
      23.1**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-141532 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 9, 2007, related to the
      consolidated financial statements of Ultitek, Ltd., which appears in this Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Ultitek, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
      2006.







/s/
      Meyler & Company, LLC


Middletown,
      New Jersey


May
      14,
      2007
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MANUEL DONASTORG
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 2750

[ August 15, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Hon. Jack B. Tuter,

Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 16

- 6342CF10A

.

Carla Patricia Lowry of Lowry at Law, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard C. Valuntas,

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

C IKLIN
, G ERBER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Ada Samuels, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See *post,*p. 878.]
§ 703.308 Substitution and withdrawal of indemnity bond, letters of credit or negotiable securities. ( a ) A self-insurer may not substitute other security for any indemnity bond or letters of credit deposited under the regulations in this part except when authorized by the Office. A self-insurer may, however, substitute negotiable securities acceptable under the regulations in this part for previously-deposited negotiable securities without the Office's prior approval.
( b ) A self-insurer discontinuing business, discontinuing operations within the purview of the Act, or securing the payment of compensation by commercial insurance under the provisions of the Act may apply to the Office for the withdrawal of the security it provided under the regulations in this part. The self-insurer must file with its application a sworn statement setting forth— ( 1 ) A list of all cases in each compensation district in which the self-insurer is paying compensation, together with the names of the employees and other beneficiaries, a description of causes of injury or death, and a statement of the amount of compensation paid;
( 2 ) A similar list of all pending cases in which the self-insurer has not yet paid compensation; and
( 3 ) A similar list of all cases in which injury or death has occurred within one year before such application or in which the last payment of compensation was made within one year before such application.
( c ) The Office may authorize withdrawal of previously-deposited indemnity bonds, letters of credit and negotiable securities that, in the opinion of the Office, are not necessary to provide adequate security for the payment of the self-insurer's outstanding and potential LHWCA obligations. No withdrawals will be authorized unless there has been no claim activity involving the self-insurer for a minimum of five years, and the Office is reasonably certain no further claims will arise.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-8466 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-045-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

ALS incorporation 1.0 $ 85.00 0 $ 85.00 8 $ 680.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 680

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
#### Rachele W. Bachi, Respondent, v. Guido Bachi, Appellant.

Ho opinion.— Present, Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Table 23
                                        U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                               Central Valley Operations Office

                                        Madera Canal and Millerton Lake
                                                      2004
Monthly Deliveries in AF

    Water Users       Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct  Nov  Dec   Total

MADERA CANAL

Chowchilla WD            0      0  11774   6688      0  20880  26297   2648      0      0    0    0   68287
Madera ID                0      0      0  22969  27634  26701  24334  17342   6075      0    0    0  125055
Soquel                   0      0      0      0      0      0      0   7963      0      0    0    0    7963

Total                    0      0  11774  29657  27634  47581  50631  27953   6075      0    0    0  201305


MILLERTON LAKE

County of Madera         2      2      3      6      6      7      8      7      6      5    3    2      57
Fresno County # 18       6      6      8     16     19     20     26     22     19     11    6    5     164
Gravelly Ford WD         0      0    996   2419   1556   1495    623   1065   1981      0    0    0   10135
                               .
Total                    8      8   1007   2441   1581   1522    657   1094   2006     16    9    7   10356


*  Data supplied by Fresno Field Division, Contracts Administration Division
§ 725.222 Conditions of entitlement; parent, brother, or sister. ( a ) An individual is eligible for benefits as a surviving parent, brother or sister if all of the following requirements are met: ( 1 ) The individual is the parent, brother, or sister of a deceased miner;
( 2 ) The individual was dependent on the miner at the pertinent time;
( 3 ) Proof of support is filed within 2 years after the miner's death, unless the time is extended for good cause (§ 725.226);
( 4 ) In the case of a brother or sister, such individual also: ( i ) Is under 18 years of age; or
( ii ) Is under a disability as defined in section 223(d) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 423(d), which began before such individual attained age 22, or in the case of a student, before the student ceased to be a student; or
( iii ) Is a student (see § 725.209(b)); or
( iv ) Is under a disability as defined in section 223(d) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 423(d), at the time of the miner's death;
( 5 ) The deceased miner: ( i ) Is determined to have died due to pneumoconiosis; or
( ii ) Filed a claim for benefits on or after January 1, 1982, which results or resulted in a final award of benefits, and the surviving parent, brother or sister filed a claim for benefits after January 1, 2005 which was pending on or after March 23, 2010.
( b ) ( 1 ) A parent is not entitled to benefits if the deceased miner was survived by a spouse or child at the time of such miner's death.
( 2 ) A brother or sister is not entitled to benefits if the deceased miner was survived by a spouse, child, or parent at the time of such miner's death.
[65 FR 80054, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 59117, Sept. 25, 2013]
#### § 10010.21 Purpose.

This subpart provides supplemental instructions for implementing those portions of the CEQ regulations pertaining to environmental impact statements (EIS).
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual Report of J. Allen Greer,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kevin Ericksteen,
Chief Financail Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ Kevin Ericksteen
                                                   --------------------------
Date: March 27, 2006                                   Kevin Ericksteen
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.
                    ( print page 22106) License No.
Name/address
Date reissued015847F
Straightline Logistics, Inc., One Cross Island Plaza, Suite 210, Rosedale, NY 11422
February 13, 2011.017279N
Unicom Trans, Inc., 15500 S. Western Avenue, Gardena, CA 90249
February 23, 2011.018125NF
Echo-Translink Systems (ETS), dba Echo Worldwide, 12356 Northup Way, Suite 112, Bellevue, WA 98006
February 28, 2011.022184N
Santiago Cargo Express, Corp., 9-16 37th Avenue, Long Island City, NY 11101
February 25, 2011.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2011-9596 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Interpretation of resistivity data

#### Professional Paper 499

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp499 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:56