alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,011.55

 1,010.84

 1,010.08

 1,009.38

 1,008.67

 1,007.94

 1,007.29

 1,006.66

 1,006.10

 1,005.52

 1,004.91

 1,004.28

 1,003.67

 1,003.03

 1,002.45

 1,001.92

 1,001.41

 1,000.84

 1,000.29

 999.77

 999.33

 998.96

 998.73

 998.54

 998.35

 998.16

 997.83

 997.54

 997.25

 997.04

 996.75

 3,087.4

 3,071.0

 3,053.6

 3,037.6

 3,021.4

 3,004.8

 2,990.1

 2,975.9

 2,963.3

 2,950.3

 2,936.7

 2,922.6

 2,909.1

 2,894.9

 2,882.2

 2,870.5

 2,859.3

 2,846.8

 2,834.9

 2,823.6

 2,814.0

 2,806.0

 2,801.0

 2,796.9

 2,792.8

 2,788.7

 2,781.6

 2,775.4

 2,769.1

 2,764.6

 2,758.4

STORAGE

-15.5

-16.4

-17.5

-16.0

-16.2

-16.6

-14.7

-14.2

-12.6

-13.0

-13.6

-14.0

-13.5

-14.2

-12.8

-11.7

-11.2

-12.5

-12.0

-11.3

-9.6

-8.0

-5.0

-4.1

-4.1

-4.1

-7.1

-6.2

-6.2

-4.5

-6.2

CHANGE

 3,512

 2,951

 3,129

 3,575

 3,589

 3,282

 3,942

 3,795

 3,927

 3,842

 3,451

 3,503

 3,427

 3,338

 3,616

 4,265

 3,608

 2,808

 3,142

 3,072

 3,293

 3,101

 2,987

 3,663

 3,535

 3,401

 3,347

 4,300

 3,317

 3,473

 2,172

INFLOW

 11,020

 10,951

 11,668

 11,444

 11,335

 11,458

 11,187

 10,746

 9,988

 10,129

 9,934

 10,410

 9,986

 10,189

 9,760

 9,946

 8,944

 8,915

 8,992

 8,597

 7,911

 7,041

 5,294

 5,522

 5,223

 5,407

 6,772

 7,156

 6,451

 5,470

 5,297

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 306

 257

 263

 202

 415

 187

 166

 212

 291

 263

 394

 164

 267

 293

 298

 200

 297

 180

 192

 179

 198

 108

 197

 210

 381

 63

 158

 284

 6

 277

 0

C.F.S.

 .45

 .38

 .39

 .30

 .62

 .28

 .25

 .32

 .44

 .40

 .60

 .25

 .41

 .45

 .46

 .31

 .46

 .28

 .30

 .28

 .31

 .17

 .31

 .33

 .60

 .10

 .25

 .45

 .01

 .44

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2002 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 23, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -344.6 106,363 273,143 0 0 6,908 10.60 .00

ACRE-FEET -344,600 210,971 541,779 0 0 13,702

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 541,779

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 541,779

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2002 .00

 3,102.9

Table 3
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF WEBB COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on June 3, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or

reverse your judgment between

In the Interest of J.A.E. Jr., Appellant

V.

No. 04-14-00660-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2011CVQ002377-C3

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the

trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees recover their costs of

this appeal from appellant.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on August 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00660-CV

In the Interest of J.A.E. Jr.

v.

(NO. 2011CVQ002377-C3 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF WEBB COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

REPORTER'S RECORD

CLERK'S RECORD

INDIGENT

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

$241.50

$232.00

$25.00

$50.00

$100.00

$20.00

PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

JORGE GARCIA

JOSE ARCE

JOSE ARCE

JOSE ARCE

JOSE ARCE

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this August 13, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 196 167 184

2 184 164 178

3 187 167 178

4 197 169 181

5 199 168 183

6 206 171 186

7 206 175 190

8 206 176 187

9 212 171 188

10 220 181 202

11 217 170 186

12 226 179 201

13 225 182 196

14 212 183 191

15 204 171 181

16 185 164 173

17 187 158 172

18 193 157 175

19 194 155 175

20 204 156 177

21 203 161 185

22 213 167 189

23 220 172 198

24 218 183 204

25 228 185 206

26 231 185 205

27 240 195 222

28 252 192 213

29 233 189 204

30 205 183 193

31 211 175 187

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Staten Island On The South Fork 

Mokelumne River 

Period: December 2022 Run Date: 1/4/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 3,049

 3,386

 3,722

 2,455

 3,173

 2,980

 3,391

 3,175

 3,649

 3,537

 3,703

 3,446

 2,601

 2,626

 1,617

 2,331

 2,677

 2,544

 3,975

 3,183

 2,792

 2,236

 3,623

 3,268

 3,057

 3,003

 2,863

 2,465

 2,781

 3,108

 3,874

 83,191

 81,928

 81,048

 80,532

 78,837

 77,910

 76,845

 76,224

 75,429

 75,125

 74,728

 74,510

 74,058

 72,826

 71,680

 69,632

 68,365

 67,489

 66,532

 66,981

 66,656

 65,976

 64,801

 65,003

 64,857

 64,519

 64,146

 63,658

 62,817

 62,318

 62,155

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2012 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: August 23, 2012

 86,240

 85,314

 84,770

 82,987

 82,010

 80,890

 80,236

 79,399

 79,078

 78,662

 78,431

 77,956

 76,659

 75,452

 73,297

 71,963

 71,042

 70,033

 70,507

 70,164

 69,448

 68,212

 68,424

 68,271

 67,914

 67,522

 67,009

 66,123

 65,598

 65,426

 66,029

 6,491,000

 6,470,000

 6,449,000

 6,427,000

 6,406,000

 6,385,000

 6,363,000

 6,342,000

 6,321,000

 6,300,000

 6,278,000

 6,257,000

 6,236,000

 6,214,000

 6,193,000

 6,172,000

 6,150,000

 6,129,000

 6,108,000

 6,086,000

 6,065,000

 6,044,000

 6,022,000

 6,001,000

 5,980,000

 5,959,000

 5,937,000

 5,916,000

 5,895,000

 5,873,000

 5,852,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 87,569
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
 COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,148,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    278,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,778,000
<PP&E>                                       3,654,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,376,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,773,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,612,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,415,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,773,000
<SALES>                                      7,832,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,832,000
<CGS>                                        6,189,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,931,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               316,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                584,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            572,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   572,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Julius Lobel, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Kings County, convicting the defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, on numerous counts, and imposing sentences thereon, and order, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1
                                                                  ------------



-----------
Wells Fargo                                             Corporate Trust Services
-----------                                             9062 Old Annapolis Road
                                                        Columbia, MD 21045-1951
                                                        410 8842000
                                                        410 715-2380 Fax

                                                        Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


March 15, 2006


CWABS, Inc.
4500 Park Granada
Calabasas, California 91302

RE: Annual Statement As To Compliance for AAMES 2005-2

Per Section 5.24a of the Transfer and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 1,
2005 (the "Agreement") the undersigned Servicing Officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. (the "Master Servicer") hereby certifies the following for the 2005
calendar year or portion thereof:

(i)    That such Servicing Officer has reviewed the activities of the Master
       Servicer during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof and its
       performance under the Agreement;

(ii)   That to the best of such Servicing Officer's knowledge, based on such
       review, the Master Servicer has performed and fulfilled its duties,
       responsibilities and obligations under the Agreement in all material
       respects throughout such year.

(iii) That nothing has come to the attention of such Servicing Officer to lead
      such Servicing Officer to believe that Aames Capital Corporation (the
      "Servicer") has failed to perform any of its duties, responsibilities,
      and obligations set forth in Article IV of the Agreement in all material
      respects throughout such year.

      And

(iv)  That the Master Servicer has received from the Servicer an annual
      certificate of compliance and a copy of the Servicer's annual audit
      report.


Certified By:                               Certified By:
/s/ Barry Akers                             /s/ Kristen Cronin
---------------------------                 ---------------------------
Barry Akers, Vice President                 Kristen Cronin, Assistant Secretary
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of City Network, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hsin
Nan Lin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
                           Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

                  (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

 By:          /s/ Hsin Nan Lin
         ---------------------------
 Name:   Hsin Nan Lin
         Chief Financial Officer

June 13, 2003




                                     E-3
### §5411. Multilateral support for structural adjustment in Poland and Hungary

#### (a) Multilateral assistance for Poland and Hungary

#### (1) In general

To the extent that Poland and Hungary continue to evolve toward pluralism and democracy and to develop and implement comprehensive economic reform programs, the United States Government shall take the leadership in mobilizing international financial institutions, in particular the International Monetary Fund and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and its affiliated institutions in the World Bank group, to provide timely and appropriate resources to help Poland and Hungary.

#### (2) World Bank structural adjustment loan for Poland

In furtherance of paragraph (1), the Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Director of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development to urge expeditious approval and disbursement by the Bank of a structural adjustment loan to Poland in an appropriate amount in time to facilitate the implementation of major economic reforms scheduled for early 1990, including the termination of energy, export, and agricultural subsidies and wage indexation.

#### (b) Stabilization assistance, debt relief, and agricultural assistance for Poland

To the extent that Poland continues to evolve toward pluralism and democracy and to develop and implement comprehensive economic reform programs, the United States Government shall do the following:

#### (1) Stabilization assistance

The United States Government, in conjunction with other member governments of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and international financial institutions (including the International Monetary Fund), shall support the implementation of a plan of the Government of Poland to attack hyperinflation and other structural economic problems, address pressing social problems, carry out comprehensive economic reform, and relieve immediate and urgent balance of payments requirements in Poland, through the use of mechanisms such as—

(A) the Exchange Stabilization Fund pursuant to section 5302 of title 31 and in accordance with established Department of the Treasury policies and procedures; and

(B) the authority provided in section 5412(c) of this title.

#### (2) Debt relief

The United States Government—

(A) shall urge all members of the "Paris Club" of creditor governments and other creditor governments to adopt, and participate in, a generous and early rescheduling program for debts owed by the Government of Poland; and

(B) in coordination with other creditor governments, shall seek to expedite consultations between the Government of Poland and its major private creditors in order to facilitate a rescheduling and reduction of payments due on debt owed to such creditors in a manner consistent with the international debt policy announced by the Secretary of the Treasury on March 10, 1989.

#### (3) Agricultural assistance

The United States Government shall provide agricultural assistance for Poland in accordance with section 5413 of this title.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title I, §101, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1302.)
#### In the Matter of Margaret FRATILA, c/o Margaret’s Greenhouse & European Floral Design, M.G. & E.D., L.L.C., Debtor, Margaret Fratila, c/o Margaret’s Greenhouse & European Floral Design, M.G. & E.D., L.L.C., Appellant, v. Mike Boudloche, Trustee, Appellee.

No. 05-40474.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 28, 2006.

Margaret Fratila, Corpus Christi, TX, pro se.

Michael B. Schmidt, Law Offices of Michael B. Schmidt, Corpus Christi, TX, for Appellee.

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Margaret Fratila is a Bankruptcy Chapter 7 debtor who appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s refusal to remove the bankruptcy trustee, based on Fratila’s dissatisfaction with various specified acts of the trustee. On appeal to the district court, the ruling of the Bankruptcy Court was affirmed. We too affirm.

Our careful review of the record on appeal, including the briefs of the parties, and our analysis of the full and legally correct opinion of the district court on appeal of the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, convinces us beyond cavil that the acts of the trustee complained of by Fratila were consistent with or required by law or were taken pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court’s orders. Inasmuch as the district court correctly disposed of the debtor’s complaints against the trustee, and well and fully explained the reasons for so doing, no useful purpose would be served by our reiterating the facts and applicable law. Rather, for the reasons set forth in the careful and complete opinion of the district court, the rulings of the Bankruptcy Court from which the debtor appeals are AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 725.704 How are arrangements for medical care made? ( a ) *Operator liability.* If an operator has been determined liable for the payment of benefits to a miner, OWCP will notify the operator or its insurance carrier of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of the authorized providers of medical benefits chosen by an entitled miner, and require the operator or carrier to: ( 1 ) Notify the miner and the providers chosen that the operator or carrier will be responsible for the cost of medical services provided to the miner on account of the miner's total disability due to pneumoconiosis;
( 2 ) Designate a person or persons with decision-making authority with whom OWCP, the miner and authorized providers may communicate on matters involving medical benefits provided under this subpart and notify OWCP, the miner and providers of this designation;
( 3 ) Make arrangements for the direct reimbursement of providers for their services.
( b ) *Fund liability.* If there is no operator found liable for the payment of benefits, OWCP will make necessary arrangements to provide medical care to the miner, notify the miner and providers selected of the liability of the fund, designate a person or persons with whom the miner or provider may communicate on matters relating to medical care, and make arrangements for the direct reimbursement of the medical provider.
Exhibit 31.2

            Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                     -------------------------------------

I, Francis Chang, certify that:

1.        I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of
ELECTRONIC SENSOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. (the "Company");

2.        Based on my knowledge, this amended quarterly report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this amended quarterly report;

3.        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this amended quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended quarterly
report;

4.        The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period for which this amended quarterly report is being
prepared; and

b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

5.        The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee
of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.


Date: September 26, 2006
                                      /s/ Francis Chang
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Francis Chang
                                      Secretary, Treasurer and Vice President
                                      of Finance and Administration