alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of 24Holdings  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger Woodward,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                     /s/ Roger Woodward
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Roger Woodward
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May 15, 2003
01/25/2011 15:14 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS §1001/002 

BEFORE THE U.S. DErARTMRNT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OTHCE-. OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

rN THE MATTER OF 

MESA AJRI-INES, INC. 

FAA DOCKF.r NO. CP09AL0011 

(Civil Penalty case) 

DMS FAA-2009-097? 

STATUS REPOHT 

J--^ 

D 

Vf* 

UJ 

J 2 

rn-^Jm 

5^,>;^ 

jrrj " ^ ^ ^ 

CyO 

In accordance with Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Cioodwn's Order served 

January 3, 2011. the sutus of the above-refercncrtl case is sec forth iimnedifllcly hrlow. 

Mesa Airlines, Inc. has submined a plan to \\\<r. United Stales Bankruptcy Courl for 

the iJoucbem Di&lrict of N<^w York, which has undergone amcndineiits. The setllenicnt 

process is moving forward. The parties have had infomnal settlement Hl.^cu.'i.sions and the 

UnittaJ States is optimistic that settlement will be reached. 

Respectfully .^iubmitted. 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement, AGC-300 

Allan H. Horowitz 

Manager, Special Proftran*'" 

Enforccmmt Division AGC-30 0 

Oflficc tjf the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue. SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

(202) 267-8323 

Dated: January ?5, 2011 
+ DMS 0002/00 2 

01/25/2011 15:14 FAX 2024935142 ^1^ ^ 

CKRTTl'ICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this date I delivered in person the original and one copy of tbr. 

Complainani's Status Fepori regarding [n TIK Matter ofMexa Airlims, Inc., I'AA Dtx^ket 

No. CP09AL0011 (Civil Penally case), DMS FAA-20d9-0072 addressed to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independcnrc Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wri£ht Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clrrfc, AGC-43 0 

In addition. 1 hereby Certify that tm, this date T have sent by facsimile a copy of the" 

Complainant's Status Repnrt regarding In The Matter of Me.\n Airlinea, Inc., FAA Docket 

No. CP09AL0011 (Civil Penalty rase), DMS FAA-2009-0972 addrcs.sed lo 

Christopher Pappaioannu 

Vice President, Legal Affair.'; 

Me.sa Air Group 

410 N. 44"' Street, Suite 100 

Phoenix, AZ 8500g 

Facsitnrie-602-225-1462 

Honorable Rirhard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

Ollice of Hearings, M-20 

Department of Tranaportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Fast BuildinR Ground Floor, Room El 2-320 

W-.i5hingion, DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

Dated: January 25^011
#### § 2310.3 Action on withdrawal applications and withdrawal proposals, except for emergency withdrawals.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED 9/30/99 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          35,960
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,937)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,593
<PP&E>                                          29,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                (10,875)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,830
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           103
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,830
<SALES>                                         37,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,584
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,102
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   480
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,646)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,638)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,008)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,008)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)


</TABLE>
### §324. Prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex

No person shall on the ground of sex be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal assistance under this title or carried on under this title. This provision will be enforced through agency provisions and rules similar to those already established, with respect to racial and other discrimination, under title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, this remedy is not exclusive and will not prejudice or cut off any other legal remedies available to a discriminatee.

(Added Pub. L. 93–87, title I, §162(a), Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 280.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Civil Rights Act of 1964, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 88–352, July 2, 1964, 78 Stat. 241. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is classified generally to subchapter V (§2000d et seq.) of chapter 21 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2000d of Title 42 and Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.49

 130.29

 130.09

 130.28

 130.34

 130.32

 130.43

 130.45

 130.48

 130.57

 130.63

 130.53

 130.43

 130.53

 130.68

 130.71

 130.86

 130.79

 130.68

 130.52

 130.51

 130.61

 130.75

 130.69

 130.76

 130.67

 130.68

 130.76

 130.89

 130.81

 632

 611

 590

 610

 616

 614

 626

 628

 631

 641

 648

 636

 626

 636

 654

 657

 674

 666

 654

 635

 634

 645

 662

 655

 663

 652

 654

 663

 677

 668

STORAGE

-19

-21

-21

+20

+6

-2

+12

+2

+3

+10

+7

-12

-10

+10

+18

+3

+17

-8

-12

-19

-1

+11

+17

-7

+8

-11

+2

+9

+14

-9

CHANGE

121

108

105

128

131

131

131

134

146

164

169

167

171

196

232

248

266

308

335

334

338

351

366

370

377

349

336

307

291

292

INFLOW

 76

 76

 76

 76

 76

 76

 76

 76

 76

 76

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 78

 82

 82

 82

 82

 82

 74

PUTAH

 55

 43

 40

 42

 52

 55

 48

 56

 67

 82

 89

 97

 100

 115

 147

 170

 181

 236

 265

 268

 263

 269

 281

 295

 290

 273

 252

 219

 201

 222

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .05

 .12

 .09

 .14

 .06

 .18

 .24

 .22

 .19

 .22

 .20

 .19

 .26

 .24

 .25

 .18

 .28

 .30

 .34

 .27

 .25

 .29

 .31

 .28

 .19

 .05

 .21

 .18

 .28

 .24

INCHES

 .80

 1.08

 .00

 .11

 .66

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 RUN DATE: 05/05/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +17 7,102 4,773 2,297 24 6.30 2.96

ACRE-FEET +17 14,087 9,467 4,556 48

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 4,556

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 9,467

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.96

JULY 1, 2013 13.76

 651

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
§ 661.420 Under what conditions may a Governor request, and the Secretary approve, a general waiver of statutory or regulatory requirements under WIA section 189(i)(4)? ( a ) A Governor may request a general waiver in consultation with appropriate chief elected officials: ( 1 ) By submitting a waiver plan which may accompany the State's WIA 5-year strategic Plan; or
( 2 ) After a State's WIA Plan is approved, by directly submitting a waiver plan.
( b ) A Governor's waiver request may seek waivers for the entire State or for one or more local areas.
( c ) A Governor requesting a general waiver must submit to the Secretary a plan to improve the Statewide workforce investment system that: ( 1 ) Identifies the statutory or regulatory requirements for which a waiver is requested and the goals that the State or local area, as appropriate, intends to achieve as a result of the waiver and how those goals relate to the Strategic Plan goals;
( 2 ) Describes the actions that the State or local area, as appropriate, has undertaken to remove State or local statutory or regulatory barriers;
( 3 ) Describes the goals of the waiver and the expected programmatic outcomes if the request is granted;
( 4 ) Describes the individuals affected by the waiver; and
( 5 ) Describes the processes used to: ( i ) Monitor the progress in implementing the waiver;
( ii ) Provide notice to any Local Board affected by the waiver;
( iii ) Provide any Local Board affected by the waiver an opportunity to comment on the request; and
( iv ) Ensure meaningful public comment, including comment by business and organized labor, on the waiver.
( d ) The Secretary issues a decision on a waiver request within 90 days after the receipt of the original waiver request.
( e ) The Secretary will approve a waiver request if and only to the extent that: ( 1 ) The Secretary determines that the requirements for which a waiver is requested impede the ability of either the State or local area to implement the State's plan to improve the Statewide workforce investment system;
( 2 ) The Secretary determines that the waiver plan meets all of the requirements of WIA section 189(i)(4) and §§ 661.400 through 661.420; and
( 3 ) The State has executed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Secretary requiring the State to meet, or ensure that the local area meets, agreed-upon outcomes and to implement other appropriate measures to ensure accountability.
( f ) The Secretary will issue guidelines under which the States may request general waivers of WIA and Wagner-Peyser requirements. (WIA sec. 189(i).)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DOD-2012-OS-0001]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Strategic Command, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice to add a system of records; correction.

# SUMMARY:

On January 13, 2012 (77 FR 2052-2053), DoD published a notice announcing its intent to add a new Privacy Act System of Records. The Categories of Records in the System paragraph was written incorrectly. This notice corrects that error.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

USSTRATCOM/J060, 901 SAC Blvd., Ste 2A9, Offutt AFB, NE 68113-6000 or call by phone at (402) 294-4461.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On January 13, 2012, DoD published a notice announcing its intent to add a new system in its inventory of Privacy Act System of Records: FSTRATCOM 01, Command Data Records. Subsequent to the publication of that notice, DoD discovered that the Categories of Records in the System paragraph on pages 2052-2053 was written incorrectly.

## Correction

                    In the notice (FR Doc. 2012-573) published on January 13, 2012 (77 FR 2052-2053), make the following                           ( print page 2711)                        correction. On page 2052, in the third column, replace the Categories of Records in the System paragraph with “Individuals name, address, status (DoD or Non-DoD), type (military or civilian), service, rank, date of rank, duty title, work address, phone number and email address, food preference/dietary comments, group affiliation (within same database), spouse information, home address (if work address not available), home phone (if work phone not available), home email (if work email not available).”                

Dated: January 13, 2012.

Aaron Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2012-1000 Filed 1-18-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
### §1755. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 98–134, §6, Oct. 18, 1983, 97 Stat. 855, which related to State jurisdiction over the reservation, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Rudolph Marwede, Appellant, v. Commercial Hotel, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In an action for specific performance of a contract described as one of employment, for salary, damages, and other relief, judgment, rendered after trial by the court without a jury, declaring that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law, and dismissing the complaint and counterclaim without prejudice, reversed on.the law and the facts; with costs to appellant, and the action remitted to Hr. Justice Hill, who tried the action at Special Term, to decide the case on the merits. The proof establishes that the shares of stock, the delivery of which plaintiff seeks to compel, are of such nature as to warrant the court, on proper findings, to order their delivery, rather than to hol'd that a recovery of their value would provide an adequate remedy. Hence, the proof established a case for equitable jurisdiction. In such situation the court of equity should retain control of the cause generally and award complete relief, even though the rights of the parties are legal and the remedy that of a. court of law. *(Jamaica Sav. Bank,*v. *M. S. Investing Co.,*274 N. Y. 215, 220.) Inasmuch as the merits of the case have not been passed upon by the trial court, this court does not pass upon the merits and render final judgment, as if acting under subdivision 2 of section 584 of the Civil Practice Act. *(Skinner*v. *Paramount Pictures,*294 N. Y. 474.) Lewis, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 729.56

 730.03

 730.40

 730.75

 731.13

 731.53

 731.80

 732.17

 732.53

 732.75

 733.07

 733.30

 733.58

 733.74

 734.00

 734.23

 734.70

 734.26

 733.06

 731.66

 730.03

 728.23

 727.58

 724.61

 720.14

 714.86

 711.77

 712.18

 712.57

 712.82

 1,558

 1,577

 1,593

 1,608

 1,624

 1,641

 1,652

 1,668

 1,684

 1,694

 1,708

 1,718

 1,731

 1,738

 1,749

 1,759

 1,781

 1,761

 1,708

 1,646

 1,577

 1,502

 1,476

 1,358

 1,191

 1,011

 914

 926

 938

 946

STORAGE

+20

+19

+16

+15

+16

+17

+11

+16

+16

+10

+14

+10

+13

+7

+11

+10

+22

-20

-53

-62

-69

-75

-26

-118

-167

-180

-97

+12

+12

+8

CHANGE

10

10

8

8

8

9

6

8

8

5

7

5

10

9

11

10

16

13

13

9

5

2

27

1

-14

-21

-14

6

6

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 5

 5

 5

 5

 23

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 60

 70

 70

 35

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 17, 2003

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -592 185 0 481

ACRE-FEET -592 367 0 954

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 954

 954

 1,538

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
#### § 684.520 Must Indian and Native American program grantees give preference to Indian and Native American entities in the selection of contractors or service providers?

Yes, INA program grantees must give as much preference as possible to Indian organizations and to Indian-owned economic enterprises, as defined in sec. 3 of the Indian Financing Act of 1974 (25 U.S.C. 1452), when awarding any contract or subgrant.
### §1465. Modification of amount of loan and document securing loan in collection of loan or in best interests of the United States

The Secretary may cancel, adjust, compromise, or reduce the amount of any loan or any portion thereof heretofore or hereafter made from the revolving loan fund established by this subchapter and its predecessor constituent funds which he determines to be uncollectable in whole or in part, or which is collectable only at an unreasonable cost, or when such action would, in his judgment, be in the best interests of the United States. He may also adjust, compromise, subordinate, or modify the terms of any mortgage, lease, assignment, contract, agreement, or other document taken to secure such loans.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title I, §105, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 78; Pub. L. 98–449, §3, Oct. 4, 1984, 98 Stat. 1725.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1984—Pub. L. 98–449 struck out proviso at end of first sentence which provided that proceedings pursuant to this section would be effective only after following the procedure set out in section 386a of this title.
Exhibit 21
  ARRIS Group Inc., 58-2588724 (Delaware), stock is publicly tradedARRIS Solutions, Inc., 26-1522408 (Delaware)C-COR Incorporated, 36-3977107 (Delaware)Broadband Management Solutions LLC, 25-1891946C-COR Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (India, dormant)ARRIS Group Canada, IncWorldbridge Broadband Services S. de R.L. e C.V. (Mexico, dormant)ARRIS Group de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)ARRIS Group Europe Holding B.V. (Netherlands)ARRIS Group B.V. (Netherlands)ARRIS Group B.V. France BranchARRIS Group B.V. U.K. BranchARRIS Germany GmbH (Germany)ARRIS International Iberica S.L. (Spain)ARRIS International Iberica S.L. Portugal BranchC-COR Argentina S.R.L.Texscan Corporation, 74-2678034 (Nevada)   dormantANTEC International Corporation (Barbados)   dormantElectronic Connector Corp. of Illinois, 36-3542005 (Illinois)Power Guard, Inc., 63-1139816 (Illinois)  dormantARRIS Korea, Inc., 51-0559046 (Delaware)ARRIS Korea, Inc. Korea BranchCommunicaciones Broadband S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)   dormantANTEC Latin
America, Inc., Sucursal Argentina (Argentina)  BranchANTEC Do Brasil LTDA (Brasil)Arris Group Japan K.K. (Tokyo, Japan)ARRIS Group Telecommunicaciones Compania Limited (Chile)Arris Communications Ireland Limited (Ireland)ARRIS Technology (Shenzen) Co., Ltd. (China)ARRIS Beijing Branch (China)ARRIS Shanghai Branch (China)ARRIS Hong Kong Rep Office (Hong Kong)
 112
### §153. Perfecting bona fide claims to lands; exchange of private lands

In all cases of unperfected bona fide claims lying within the said boundaries of said reserve, which claims have been properly initiated prior to September 2, 1902, said claims may be perfected upon compliance with the requirements of the laws respecting settlement, residence, improvements, and so forth, in the same manner in all respects as claims are perfected to other Government lands: Provided, That to the extent that the lands within said reserve are held in private ownership the Secretary of the Interior is authorized in his discretion to exchange therefor public lands of like area and value, which are surveyed, vacant, unappropriated, not mineral, not timbered, and not required for reservoir sites or other public uses or purposes. The private owners must, at their expense and by appropriate instruments of conveyance, surrender to the Government a full and unencumbered right and title to the private lands included in any exchange before patents are issued for or any rights attached to the public lands included therein, and no charge of any kind shall be made for issuing such patents. Upon completion of any exchange the lands surrendered to the Government shall become a part of said reserve in a like manner as if they had been public lands at the time of the establishment of said reserve. Nothing contained in this section shall be construed to authorize the issuance of any land scrip, and the State of South Dakota is granted the privilege of selecting from the public lands in said State an equal quantity of land in lieu of such portions of section sixteen included within said reserve as have not been sold or disposed of by said State and are not covered by an unperfected bona fide claim as above mentioned.

(Mar. 22, 1906, ch. 1127, §3, 34 Stat. 83.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 465

 458

 400

 418

 433

 504

 544

 568

 485

 752

 880

 701

 739

 704

 706

 663

 618

 487

 479

 496

 525

 561

 505

 552

 561

 516

 512

 456

 490

 496

 204

 202

 196

 284

 260

 231

 229

 214

 237

 273

 289

 259

 272

 261

 242

 202

 262

 269

 226

 237

 221

 199

 195

 181

 185

 174

 173

 201

 184

 210

 340

 314

 337

 341

 368

 376

 363

 377

 384

 455

 514

 477

 494

 489

 471

 451

 424

 399

 384

 373

 373

 360

 355

 367

 364

 349

 345

 337

 341

 352

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 31, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER