alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Zoro Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Andrew Brodkey, President/Chief Executive Officer and Frank Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated: August 15, 2011                                                                                                                               
|   





|                                                 |  |  |                                      | 
|------------------------------------------------ |  |  | ------------------------------------ | 
|"Andrew Brodkey"                                 |  |  | "Frank Garcia"                       | 
|Andrew Brodkey
President/Chief Executive Officer |  |  | Frank Garcia
Chief Financial Officer | 
|                                                 |  |  |                                      |
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4549 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to conduct security 

screening at certain airports, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2016 

Mr. WALDEN (for himself, Mr. HURD of Texas, Mrs. LUMMIS, Mr. DEFAZIO, 

and Mr. KILMER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 

conduct security screening at certain airports, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treating Small Air5 ports with Fairness Act of 2016’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4549 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONDUCT OF SECURITY SCREENING BY THE TRANS2 PORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AT 

3 CERTAIN AIRPORTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Trans5 portation Security Administration shall provide for secu6 rity screening to be conducted by the Transportation Secu7 rity Administration at, and provide all necessary staff and 

8 equipment to, any airport— 

9 (1) that lost commercial air service on or after 

10 January 1, 2013; and 

11 (2) the operator of which, following the loss de12 scribed in paragraph (1), submits to the Adminis13 trator— 

14 (A) a request for security screening to be 

15 conducted at such airport by the Transpor16 tation Security Administration; and 

17 (B) written confirmation of a commitment 

18 from a commercial air carrier— 

19 (i) that such air carrier intends to re20 sume commercial air service at such air21 port; and 

22 (ii) to resume such service not later 

23 than the date that is one year after the 

24 date of the submission of the request 

25 under subparagraph (A). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4549 IH

1 (b) DEADLINE.—Subject to the one-year limitation 

2 described in subsection (a)(2)(B)(ii), the Administrator of 

3 the Transportation Security Administration shall ensure 

4 that the process of implementing security screening by the 

5 Transportation Security Administration at an airport de6 scribed in subsection (a) is complete not later than the 

7 later of— 

8 (1) the date that is 90 days after the date on 

9 which the operator of such airport submits to the 

10 Administrator a request for such screening under 

11 paragraph (2)(A) of such subsection; or 

12 (2) the date on which the commercial air car13 rier that is the subject of such a request intends to 

14 resume commercial air service at such airport. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 198

 196

 203

 197

 199

 201

 248

 241

 209

 155

 139

 141

 154

 196

 209

 219

 150

 155

 140

 149

 156

 145

 149

 145

 151

 144

 140

 143

 141

 149

 147

 172

 171

 172

 173

 176

 180

 196

 200

 151

 114

 114

 129

 131

 134

 154

 130

 117

 117

 119

 123

 127

 137

 133

 132

 132

 135

 133

 127

 128

 131

 133

 183

 181

 184

 182

 188

 192

 211

 216

 175

 131

 126

 136

 140

 151

 174

 156

 129

 127

 126

 132

 137

 141

 140

 137

 138

 139

 136

 133

 133

 136

 136

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.89

 130.92

 130.97

 130.99

 130.80

 130.40

 130.18

 129.99

 129.79

 130.27

 130.66

 130.92

 130.42

 129.60

 129.70

 129.87

 130.26

 130.60

 130.71

 129.76

 129.50

 129.90

 129.85

 129.86

 130.08

 129.99

 130.03

 130.07

 130.18

 130.47

 677

 680

 686

 689

 667

 623

 599

 580

 559

 609

 651

 680

 625

 541

 551

 567

 608

 644

 657

 556

 531

 570

 565

 566

 589

 580

 584

 588

 599

 630

STORAGE

-3

+3

+6

+3

-22

-44

-24

-19

-21

+50

+42

+29

-55

-84

+10

+16

+41

+36

+13

-101

-25

+39

-5

+1

+23

-9

+4

+4

+11

+31

CHANGE

139

130

128

127

93

65

63

65

64

50

46

44

38

48

62

48

46

43

41

49

87

102

65

66

63

40

47

47

51

104

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 29

 30

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 68

PUTAH

 116

 103

 100

 100

 79

 62

 50

 50

 50

 0

 0

 0

 36

 65

 32

 15

 0

 0

 9

 75

 75

 57

 43

 40

 26

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .07

 .10

 .11

 .02

 .01

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .08

 .01

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .07

 .05

 .10

 .14

 .05

 .04

 .06

 .08

 .04

 .02

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .36

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .17

 .03

 1.11

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .04

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 RUN DATE: 12/23/2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -50 2,061 1,283 802 0 1.56 1.92

ACRE-FEET -50 4,088 2,545 1,591 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,591

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,545

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.92

JULY 1, 2003 2.20

 680

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 17.10 Judicial review.

Action taken pursuant to section 602 of the act is subject to judicial review as provided in section 603 of the act.

[29 FR 16293, Dec. 4, 1964]
§ 686.520 What responsibilities do the center operators have in managing work-based learning? ( a ) The center operator must emphasize and implement work-based learning programs for students through center program activities, including career and technical skills training, and through arrangements with employers. Work-based learning must be under actual working conditions and must be designed to enhance the employability, responsibility, and confidence of the students. Work-based learning usually occurs in tandem with students' career technical training.
( b ) The center operator must ensure that students are assigned only to workplaces that meet the safety standards described in § 686.920.
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of the Trust during the 2009 calendar year; |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge, except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Trustee’s compliance with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement, that is included in these reports. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 500.61

 500.92

 501.10

 501.27

 501.66

 501.99

 502.45

 503.14

 503.33

 503.82

 504.12

 504.41

 504.58

 504.58

 504.45

 504.10

 503.87

 503.74

 503.49

 503.26

 503.26

 503.26

 502.95

 502.59

 502.35

 502.13

 501.78

 501.43

 501.04

 500.34

 1,514,685

 1,518,248

 1,520,318

 1,522,275

 1,526,766

 1,530,570

 1,535,877

 1,543,850

 1,546,048

 1,551,721

 1,555,198

 1,558,562

 1,560,535

 1,560,535

 1,559,026

 1,554,966

 1,552,301

 1,550,795

 1,547,900

 1,545,238

 1,545,238

 1,545,238

 1,541,653

 1,537,494

 1,534,723

 1,532,184

 1,528,149

 1,524,117

 1,519,628

 1,511,583

STORAGE

+3,331

+3,563

+2,070

+1,957

+4,491

+3,804

+5,307

+7,973

+2,198

+5,673

+3,477

+3,364

+1,973

+0

-1,509

-4,060

-2,665

-1,506

-2,895

-2,662

+0

+0

-3,585

-4,159

-2,771

-2,539

-4,035

-4,032

-4,489

-8,045

CHANGE

2,191

2,498

1,247

1,247

2,513

1,874

3,115

4,351

1,240

3,118

1,848

1,839

1,226

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

780

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 633

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 642

 1,924

 1,200

 647

 1,376

 1,280

 0

 0

 1,940

 1,934

 1,287

 891

 1,930

 1,927

 2,091

 3,860

POWER

 110

 114

 113

 110

 79

 76

 72

 75

 73

 87

 95

 101

 102

 127

 117

 116

 118

 115

 121

 135

 126

 123

 131

 140

 146

 140

 146

 162

 175

 196

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+231

-588

-90

-150

-170

+120

-368

-256

-59

-171

+0

-42

-129

+127

-2

-7

-26

+3

+37

+73

-654

+123

+264

-23

+36

-250

+42

+56

+3

-1

OR

 93

 112

 119

 123

 71

 0

 45

 94

 71

 26

 109

 113

 71

 109

 143

 169

 120

 120

 97

 116

 94

 120

 153

 187

 216

 205

 209

 179

 179

 160

C.F.S.

 .25

 .30

 .32

 .33

 .19

 .00

 .12

 .25

 .19

 .07

 .29

 .30

 .19

 .29

 .38

 .45

 .32

 .32

 .26

 .31

 .25

 .32

 .41

 .50

 .58

 .55

 .56

 .48

 .48

 .43

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .40

 .00

 .13

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR June 12, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2020 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +229 29,087 23,562 3,541 0 -1,871 3,623 9.69 .80

ACRE-FEET +229 57,694 46,735 7,024 0 -3,711 7,186

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 46,735

PACHECO TUNNEL 7,024 TOTAL 53,759

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE = 8.15

 1,511,354

SPILL 0 .80

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 8.15
§ 670.320 What are the requirements for award of contracts and payments to Federal agencies? ( a ) The requirements of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended; the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977; the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 1); and the DOL Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR Chapter 29) apply to the award of contracts and to payments to Federal agencies.
( b ) Job Corps funding of Federal agencies that operate CCC's are made by a transfer of obligational authority from DOL to the respective operating agency.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 832.67

 832.60

 832.96

 833.34

 833.15

 833.25

 833.20

 833.02

 832.80

 832.56

 832.40

 832.29

 832.29

 832.31

 832.77

 833.11

 833.37

 833.63

 833.90

 833.56

 833.16

 832.82

 832.47

 834.15

 834.10

 834.19

 834.92

 835.42

 835.71

 40.20

 40.12

 40.53

 40.98

 40.75

 40.87

 40.81

 40.60

 40.35

 40.08

 39.89

 39.77

 39.77

 39.79

 40.32

 40.71

 41.01

 41.31

 41.63

 41.23

 40.77

 40.37

 39.97

 41.92

 41.86

 41.97

 42.83

 43.43

 43.77

STORAGE

+1.79

-0.08

+0.41

+0.44

-0.22

+0.12

-0.06

-0.21

-0.25

-0.27

-0.18

-0.13

+0.00

+0.02

+0.53

+0.39

+0.30

+0.30

+0.31

-0.40

-0.47

-0.39

-0.40

+1.95

-0.06

+0.11

+0.86

+0.60

+0.35

CHANGE

1,593

1,299

1,552

2,004

1,107

776

645

571

547

533

582

609

673

688

628

547

501

502

507

476

441

475

470

1,344

4,855

2,075

1,252

983

844

INFLOW

 45

 692

 646

 1,131

 567

 63

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 25

 4,229

 1,364

 159

 20

 20

SPILL

 644

 646

 698

 650

 650

 652

 654

 655

 652

 650

 652

 651

 651

 651

 340

 327

 327

 328

 327

 654

 654

 652

 651

 338

 656

 656

 657

 659

 644

OUTLET

 2

 1

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 5

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 2

 2

 3

 5

C.F.S.

 .06

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .15

 .09

 .09

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .06

 .07

 .12

INCHES

 .53

 .00

 .43

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .05

 .45

 .00

 1.66

 .84

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

FEBRUARY 2008 RUN DATE: 05/08/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +5.36 29,079 17,026 9,301 51 1.44 3.97

ACRE-FEET +5,360 57,678 33,771 18,449 101

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 18,449

OUTLET

TOTAL

 33,771

 52,220

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.97

JULY 1, 2007 19.01

 38.41

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
Exhibit 5.1

                  [Headed Paper of Zellermayer, Pelossof & Co.]



November 20, 2001

Given Imaging Ltd.
2 Ha'Carmel Street
Yoqneam 20692
Israel

RE: REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

          We have acted as counsel to Given Imaging Ltd., an Israeli company
(the "Company") in connection with the registration of 3,456,183 Ordinary
Shares, par value NIS 0.05 per shares (the "Shares"), issuable pursuant to the
Company's 1998 and 2000 Stock Option Plans (together, the "Plans") as described
in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") to be
filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

          We have examined originals or copies, certified or otherwise
identified to our satisfaction, of all such agreements, certificates, and other
statements of corporate officers and other representatives of the Company, and
other documents provided to us by the Company as we have deemed necessary as a
basis for this opinion. In our examination we have assumed the legal capacity of
all natural persons, the existence of and authorization by all non-natural
persons (other than the Company), the genuineness of all signatures, the
authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals and the conformity
with the originals of all documents submitted to us as copies. As to relevant
facts material to our opinion, we have relied, without any independent
investigation or verification, upon written or oral statements of officers and
other representatives of the Company and certificates of public officials.

          In giving the opinion expressed herein, no opinion is expressed as to
the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of Israel. Based upon and
subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that insofar as Israeli law is
concerned:

1.   The Company is a corporation duly organized and validly existing under the
     laws of the State of Israel.

2.   The Shares have been duly authorized and reserved for issuance by the
     Company and, when issued and sold against payment therefor of the exercise
     price as described in the Registration Statement, will be legally issued,
     fully paid and non-assessable.

                                                 Very truly yours,

                                                 /s/ Zellermayer, Pelossof & Co.

                                                 Zellermayer, Pelossof & Co.
<PAGE>
#### Anna Klipack et al., Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Atlas Fringing & Sportswear Co., Appellants, v. Raymar Novelties, Inc., Respondent.

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
## OoT-o5T-3co3 ^ \\^4 G Dor-o5r-acD3. - [l-\s \ L;::picFP^"'3mRW!0 N _ CLEVELAN D

•. • i _. _ CLEVELAN D HOPKIN S MTERriATIOHAl . AlffPOit T AIRPOR T SYSTE M CLE, . 

### B l / I CLEVELAN D BURK E Apri l 7 , 201 0 Mr . Denni s J . DeVan

y Chief , EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysis , X-5 3 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Wcishington , D.C . 2059 0 Mr . DeVanjr. I woul dlik

e t o expres s m

y support an dtha t o f th e Cit y o f Cleveland , Ohi o fo

r th e Gulfstrea mInternationa l Airline s Essential Ai r Servic e filing fo

r Altoon aan d Johnstown , P

A servic e t o Qevelan dHopMn s Internationa l Airport . Th e Cit y o f Qevelan ddesire s t o gro w ai r service s at

ClevelandHopkin s Internationa l Airpor t fo r Northeas t

Ohi o traveler s a s well a s offe r additiona l convenien t

connection s t o traveler s wh o migh t

otherwis e suffe

r delay s a t busie r competin g airports . Altoon a an dJohnstow n traveler s woul denjoy th e benefit s o f connectin g throug h th e Continenta l Airline' s CL

E hub , a n eas y t o navigate facilit y wit h asignificant

variet y o f connectin g marke t

destination s unlike some othe r airport s tha t

ma y b e similarl y free o f congestio n bu t

no t offe r near s o man y connectin g marke t destinations . Lastly , thi s servic e will als o offe

r nonsto p flight s t o Pennsylvani aresident s seekin g critical medical care provide db y Geveland' s world-clas s hospitals . I appreciat e you r

consideratio n o

f ou r support fo r EA S servic e fromAltoon aan d Johnstow n t o CLE . Sincerely , Rick y L> . Smit h Directo r o f Airport s CC : Tod dPayne , ClevelandHopkin s Internationa l Airpor t Micke y Bowman , Gulfstrea

mInternationa

l Airline s

'^!.- - -i.mi l l[i'pl-in > fiH-.rii.!h.'.i,i | "iiy^! ! < I ••--I^MR I I'MI!.. : I .li . ;l':-!i ! jro ' [ • I 1 [;.r ' :;|-H^' ' I ••. . | ^. . nl i .l,'.r_;in.i l !<.•. >
#### Martin Kallmann, Respondent, v. Daniel Wolf, Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present ■— Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
#### § 681.710 Do Local Workforce Development Boards have the flexibility to offer services to area youth who are not eligible under the youth program through the one-stop centers?

Yes. However, Local WDBs must ensure one-stop centers fund services for non-eligible youth through programs authorized to provide services to such youth. For example, one-stop centers may provide basic labor exchange services under the Wagner-Peyser Act to any youth.