alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  May 13, 2005

/s/ Ann F. Massey
------------------------------------
Name:    Ann F. Massey
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER VII—REINDEER INDUSTRY
### §3653. Employment standards

The Commission shall establish written standards for—

(1) determining the qualifications and fitness of employees and of candidates for employment in positions; and

(2) selecting individuals for appointment, promotion, or transfer to positions.

The standards shall conform to the provisions of this subpart, any regulations prescribed thereunder, and the Panama Canal Employment System.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1213, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 464; Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3531, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2863.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–201 substituted "The Commission" for "The head of each agency" in introductory provisions.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Coordination of Pay and Employment Practices

For provisions requiring consultations with the Secretary of Defense for agencies under this subpart with respect to the establishment of rates of pay and other matters deemed appropriate by the Secretary in order to develop compatible or unified systems of basic pay and employment practices, see section 1–201 of Ex. Ord. No. 12215, May 27, 1980, 45 F.R. 36043, set out as a note under section 3601 of this title.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
       OF CANYON RESOURCES CORPORATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I, Gary C. Huber, certify that:

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Canyon
Resources Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary C. Huber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, to the best
of my knowledge, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1)       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




                                        /s/ Gary C. Huber
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:    Gary C. Huber
                                        Title:   Chief Financial Officer
                                        Date:    August 14, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Fingerhut Companies, Inc. for the quarter
ended September 26, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-26-1997
<CASH>                                          77,943
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  823,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                   160,397
<INVENTORY>                                    173,179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,179,954
<PP&E>                                         481,290
<DEPRECIATION>                                 208,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,560,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          628,233
<BONDS>                                        246,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           462
<OTHER-SE>                                     626,420
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,560,175
<SALES>                                        954,037
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,149,270
<CGS>                                          482,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,074,270
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,857
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                90,691
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,842
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 44,301
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,838
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,463
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,463
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
        

</TABLE>
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 228 181 214

2 235 177 206

3 232 165 202

4 230 158 191

5 215 150 182

6 212 152 177

7 223 158 188

8 214 162 188

9 219 163 187

10 216 168 188

11 193 144 163

12 170 117 140

13 147 103 123

14 144 104 120

15 145 105 121

16 147 98 122

17 143 106 121

18 141 107 122

19 149 111 129

20 146 118 136

21 151 118 136

22 152 120 135

23 153 117 136

24 161 124 141

25 159 126 140

26 156 128 140

27 160 130 139

28 162 133 144

29 159 135 146

30 153 142 148

31 159 142 153

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Andreas On The San Joaquin River 

Period: March 2023 Run Date: 4/7/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         449,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,272,937
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,411,756
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,092,136
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,544,878
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,392,607
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               352,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                331,756
<INCOME-TAX>                                   331,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   331,756
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .041
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .041
        

</TABLE>
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0355 Directorate ID : 2011 - SW - 013 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. Model AB412 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 0 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent loss of the blade tip weight, loss of a blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : There are currently no costs of compliance because no helicopters of this ty pe design are on th e U.S. Registry . Parts per Helicopter $ Labor per Helicopter (X x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the inspection) $ Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ Total US Fleet Cost $ Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory a ction?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Sharon Miles
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Financial Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  February 12, 2008


By:  /s/ EDWARD C. HALL
   --------------------------------
         Edward C. Hall
         Chief Financial Officer
### §290i–12. Seventh capital increase

#### (a) Subscription authorized

#### (1) In general

The United States Governor of the Bank may subscribe on behalf of the United States to 532,023 additional shares of the capital stock of the Bank.

#### (2) Limitation

Any subscription by the United States to the capital stock of the Bank shall be effective only to such extent and in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank under subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $7,286,587,008 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (2) Share types

Of the amount authorized to be appropriated under paragraph (1)—

(A) $437,190,016 shall be for paid in shares of the Bank; and

(B) $6,849,396,992 shall be for callable shares of the Bank.

(Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1345, as added Pub. L. 116–136, div. B, title XI, §21012(b)(3), Mar. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 594.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         389,580
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,766
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               451,346
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 474,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,203,915
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (729,564)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   474,351
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,554
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               124,570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (84,016)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (84,016)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (84,016)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 33.2**Management’s Assertion of Compliance**Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (the “Company”) is responsible forproviding this platform-level assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified inItem 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.Management has determined that the following servicing criteria are applicable in regards to theplatform for the following period:Platform: publicly-issued (*i.e*., transaction-level reporting initially requiredunder the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backedsecurities, automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed securitiesissued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides the following servicingfunctions (the “Platform”): **•** paying agent, securities administration and trustee; or  **•** securities administration and paying agent; or  **•** paying agent and trustee; or  **•** paying agent.Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122( d),to the extent required by the Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activitiesperformed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, excluding thefollowing servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(1)(iii) 1122(d)(1)(iv),1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i), 1122(d)(4)(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(iv) through 1122(d)(4)(xiv)(the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2006 (the “Period”).With respect to the Platform, the Company’s management provides the following assessment ofcompliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria: **•** The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance withthe Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.  **•** The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of and for the Period. In making this assessment, management used thecriteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item1122 of Regulation AB.  **•** Based on such assessment, as of and for the Period, the Company has complied, in allmaterial respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect tomanagement’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for thePeriod.         **CITIBANK, N.A.**           By: /s/ Jeffrey Volk             Jeffrey Volk           Its: Managing Director                  Date: February 28, 2007
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2344** 

RANDOLPH S. KOCH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD; SUSAN TSUI GRUNDMANN, In her Official Capacity as Chairman, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. ( 8:12

- cv
- 01590

- DKC )

Submitted : June 24, 2014 Decided: July 3, 2014

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Randolph S. Koch , Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opin ions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Randolph S. Koch appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing this employment discrimination action pursuant to
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible err or. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Koch v. U

. S

. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

No. 8:12

- cv
- 01590

- DKC (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2013). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1043. TAURUS TYRONE ACKEY v. THE STATE.

On September 19, 2014, the trial court entered an order dismissing Taurus

Tyrone Ackey’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. On October 27, 2014, Ackey

filed a notice of appeal to this Court. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed

within 30 days after entry of the appealable order. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The

proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer

jurisdiction on this Court. Jaheni v. State, 281 Ga. App. 213, 214 (635 SE2d 821)

(2006). Because Ackey filed his notice of appeal 38 days after entry of the trial

court’s order, this appeal is untimely. Accordingly, this appeal is herebyDISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/24/2015

February 24, 2015
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the annual Report of Foresight Specialists, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
Ericksteen, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
April 30, 2008





/s/ Kevin Ericksteen


Kevin
Ericksteen


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Waterstone Financial, Inc





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 of Waterstone Financial, Inc. of our reports dated March 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Waterstone Financial, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Waterstone Financial, Inc.





/s/ KPMG LLP





Milwaukee, Wisconsin


March 16, 2010
----

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

| (1)       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |
| (2)       | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                     |
|                     | Dated: August 12, 2009.                                                                                                                               |
|                     |

|                              |   |   |                    |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| /s/  ANDREW BRODKEY          |   |   | /s/  JAS BUTALIA   |   |
| Andrew Brodkey                    |   |   | Jas Butalia             |   |
| President/Chief Executive Officer |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |