alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 814.22

 813.49

 812.76

 811.98

 811.18

 810.40

 810.34

 810.36

 810.43

 810.50

 810.55

 810.60

 810.65

 810.71

 810.76

 810.81

 810.96

 811.14

 811.26

 811.50

 811.98

 812.74

 813.09

 813.31

 813.46

 813.58

 813.69

 813.79

 814.46

 816.96

 22.14

 21.56

 20.98

 20.37

 19.76

 19.18

 19.14

 19.15

 19.20

 19.25

 19.29

 19.33

 19.37

 19.41

 19.45

 19.49

 19.60

 19.73

 19.82

 20.01

 20.37

 20.96

 21.24

 21.41

 21.53

 21.63

 21.72

 21.80

 22.34

 24.43

STORAGE

-0.61

-0.59

-0.58

-0.61

-0.61

-0.58

-0.04

+0.01

+0.05

+0.05

+0.04

+0.04

+0.04

+0.05

+0.04

+0.04

+0.11

+0.14

+0.09

+0.18

+0.37

+0.59

+0.28

+0.17

+0.12

+0.10

+0.09

+0.08

+0.54

+2.09

CHANGE

0

10

15

1

-1

13

33

35

54

55

47

47

47

52

47

47

84

96

72

120

216

326

167

116

88

76

72

68

301

1,084

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 305

 305

 305

 305

 305

 305

 53

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

OUTLET

 0

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 3

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

C.F.S.

 .00

 .05

 .03

 .07

 .09

 .07

 .07

 .06

 .06

 .08

 .03

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .11

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .02

INCHES

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .80

 .27

 .00

 .00

 .68

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 1.48

 1.87

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 RUN DATE: 01/18/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.69 3,388 2,504 0 35 1.31 5.19

ACRE-FEET +1,690 6,720 4,967 0 69

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 4,967

 4,967

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.19

JULY 1, 2012 5.62

 22.75

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57174]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD05-04-166]
RIN 1625-AA-09


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Delaware River, NJ

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District, has approved a 
temporary deviation from the regulations governing the operation of the 
Delair Railroad Bridge across the Delaware River mile 104.5, between 
Philadelphia, PA, and Delair, NJ. This deviation allows the drawbridge 
to remain in the closed-to-navigation position from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., 
on nine consecutive Mondays on September 27 through November 22, 2004, 
to facilitate replacement of bridge timbers.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 8 a.m. on September 27, 2004, 
to 4 p.m. on November 22, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bill Brazier, Bridge Management 
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at (757) 398-6422.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: New Jersey Transit, who operates their 
trains and controls the signaling system at the Delair Railroad Bridge, 
has requested a temporary deviation from the operating regulation to 
facilitate needed replacement of bridge timbers.
    To facilitate this replacement, the vertical lift-span will be 
locked in the closed-to-navigation position from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. on 
nine consecutive Mondays: on September 27; on October 4, 11, 18, and 
25; and on November 1, 8, 15, and 22, 2004. During these stages, the 
work requires completely immobilizing the operation of the vertical-
lift span in the closed-to-navigation position. At all other times, the 
bridge will operate in accordance with the current operating 
regulations outlined in 33 CFR 117.716.
    The Coast Guard has informed the known users of the waterway of the 
closure periods for the bridge so that these vessels can arrange their 
transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    The District Commander has granted temporary deviation from the 
operating requirements listed in 33 CFR 117.35 for the purpose of 
repair completion of the drawbridge. The temporary deviation allows the 
Delair Railroad Bridge across the Delaware River mile 104.5, between 
Philadelphia, PA and Delair, NJ, to remain closed to navigation from 8 
a.m. to 4 p.m. on nine consecutive Mondays: on September 27; on October 
4, 11, 18, and 25; and on November 1, 8, 15, and 22, 2004.

    Dated: September 20, 2004.
Waverly W. Gregory, Jr.,
Chief, Bridge Administration Branch, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 04-21526 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
#### § 725.403 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 101

 93

 80

 101

 101

 88

 103

 79

 76

 95

 74

 90

 93

 82

 73

 89

 86

 75

 67

 66

 61

 60

 64

 64

 63

 67

 60

 69

 67

 65

 70

 70

 71

 71

 70

 70

 70

 68

 70

 69

 68

 67

 66

 64

 61

 59

 59

 57

 56

 55

 56

 55

 55

 56

 55

 54

 58

 57

 57

 61

 77

 74

 73

 75

 75

 74

 74

 71

 71

 71

 71

 69

 69

 67

 66

 62

 61

 60

 58

 56

 57

 57

 57

 57

 56

 59

 58

 59

 59

 62

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 6, 2004

HIGH LOW MEAN

 71.9

 73.0

 72.8

 73.2

 72.9

 73.8

 73.0

 71.0

 70.8

 71.8

 71.6

 71.3

 72.2

 77.5

 80.6

 70.8

 69.5

 67.7

 66.2

 66.0

 66.1

 65.9

 65.5

 65.3

 65.7

 66.8

 66.7

 66.9

 67.6

 68.3

 66.8

 67.9

 68.0

 67.8

 67.9

 68.4

 68.3

 67.1

 66.1

 65.9

 66.6

 66.4

 67.1

 68.2

 69.6

 66.8

 66.3

 64.5

 63.3

 62.4

 62.4

 62.5

 62.3

 62.0

 61.9

 63.0

 63.2

 63.7

 63.4

 64.6

 69.3

 70.4

 70.4

 70.5

 70.5

 71.0

 70.5

 69.1

 68.3

 68.7

 69.0

 68.9

 69.6

 71.0

 75.2

 68.9

 67.9

 66.3

 64.9

 64.2

 64.3

 64.3

 64.1

 63.7

 63.8

 64.8

 65.1

 65.4

 65.5

 66.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.0

 8.8

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 8.8

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 8.9

 8.7

 9.0

 8.7

 8.3

 0.0

 9.3

 9.3

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 9.1

 9.0

 8.4

 8.2

 8.2

 8.4

 8.4

 8.2

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 7.9

 0.0

 8.7

 8.7

 9.0

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 8.7

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.5

 8.4

 8.5

 8.6

 8.5

 8.4

 8.5

 8.3

 8.0

 0.0

 8.9

 9.0

 9.2

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.2

 9.1

 9.0

 8.9

 8.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
Exhibit 3.4




                                FIRST AMENDMENT


     FIRST  AMENDMENT  (this  "Amendment"),  dated as of April 25, 2002,  to the
Amended and Restated Limited  Liability  Company  Agreement of Greyhound Funding
LLC,  dated as of October 28,  1999 (the "LLC  Agreement"),  is entered  into by
Raven  Funding LLC, a Delaware  limited  liability  company,  as the sole common
member (the "Common Member").



                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                               - - - - - - - - - -


I.   Amendment.

     WHEREAS,  pursuant to Section 15.1 of the LLC  Agreement and subject to the
terms and  conditions of this  Amendment,  the Common Member wishes to amend the
LLC Agreement as herein provided.

     NOW, THEREFORE:

          1. The LLC  Agreement is hereby  amended by deleting the  reference to
     "Greyhound  Funding LLC" in each place it appears in the LLC  Agreement and
     inserting "Chesapeake Funding LLC" in lieu thereof.

II.  Miscellaneous Provisions.

          1. This  Amendment is limited as specified and shall not  constitute a
     modification,  acceptance  or  waiver  of any  other  provision  of the LLC
     Agreement.

          2. THIS AMENDMENT  SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE  WITH AND GOVERNED
     BY THE LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EXCLUDING ANY CONFLICT-OF-LAWS  RULE OR
     PRINCIPLE THAT MIGHT REFER THE GOVERNANCE OR CONSTRUCTION OF THIS AMENDMENT
     TO THE LAW OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION.

          3. From and after the date of the  execution  of this  Amendment,  all
     references  to the  "Agreement"  in the LLC Agreement and the LLC Agreement
     shall be deemed to be references to the LLC Agreement as modified hereby.

                                      * * *


<PAGE>


     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Common  Member  has  caused its duly  authorized
officer  to execute  and  deliver  this  Amendment  as of the date  first  above
written.



                                           SOLE COMMON MEMBER:



                                           RAVEN FUNDING LLC



                                           By:  /s/ Joseph W. Weikel
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Name:   Joseph W. Weikel
                                               Title:  Manager
(No. 73-CC-363

#### Lake Forest College, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 15, 1973.*

Milton I. Shadur, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 201

 202

 198

 195

 191

 189

 192

 191

 182

 188

 190

 192

 196

 187

 186

 189

 178

 166

 147

 130

 133

 148

 144

 160

 150

 154

 165

 157

 159

 156

 166

 148

 147

 148

 151

 148

 153

 145

 136

 137

 131

 122

 125

 133

 137

 136

 129

 100

 89

 90

 94

 97

 93

 89

 92

 100

 103

 99

 100

 103

 110

 113

 178

 181

 177

 171

 168

 171

 171

 159

 157

 159

 158

 163

 171

 171

 170

 165

 148

 125

 115

 112

 115

 114

 110

 111

 116

 115

 121

 115

 123

 126

 131

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 25, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elias GOMEZ-ROMERO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41598

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Renata Ann Gowie, Assistant U.S.

*604Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, GARWOOD, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Having pleaded guilty, Elias Gomez-Romero (Gomez) appeals his conviction and 63-month sentence for being illegally present in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Gomez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United, States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Gomez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in hght of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Gomez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in fight of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review. Accordingly, Gomez’s conviction is affirmed.

Gomez contends that his sentence must be vacated because he was sentenced pursuant to mandatory Sentencing Guidelines that were held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Although Gomez asserts that the error in his case is structural and not susceptible of harmless error analysis, we have previously rejected this specific argument. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463 (5th Cir. 2005).

In the alternative, Gomez contends that the Government cannot show that the sentencing error was harmless. We review Gomez’s preserved challenge to his sentence for harmless error under Fed. R.Crim.P. 52(a). *See Walters,*418 F.3d at 463.

The district court sentenced Gomez to the lowest sentence in the relevant guidelines sentencing range. The record does not indicate, and the Government has not shown, that the district court would have imposed the same sentence under an advisory guidelines regime. *See United States v. Garza,*429 F.3d 165, 170-71 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we vacate Gomez’s sentence and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED IN PART; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Parraguirre SCR 114(4) provides that this court shall impose identical

reciprocal discipline unless the attorney demonstrates, or this court finds, that one of four exceptions applies. None of the exceptions is present in this case. Accordingly, we grant the petition for reciprocal discipline. Attorney Treva J. Hearne is hereby suspended from the practice of law for one year, with that suspension stayed, and placed on probation for two years. Hearne shall provide to the State Bar proof that she has passed the MPRE and proof of compliance with the conditions of probation imposed upon her by California. Hearne and the State Bar shall comply with SCR 115 and SCR 121.1.

It is so ORDERED. 2
, C.J.

Hardesty

2 The Honorable Nancy M. Saitta, Justice, did not participate in the resolution of this matter.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947Acc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Treva J. Hearne Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 3
DEPARTMENT OF AIR QUALITY 8 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

March 12,2010
Leo Drozdoff, P.E., Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection 901 South Stewart St. Suite4001 Carson City, Nevada 89701-5249 500 S Grand Central Parkway 1st Floor . Box 5552 10
. Las Vegas, NV89155-52 10 (702) 455-5942 . FOX(702) 383-9994 Lewis Wallenrneyer Director .Tina Gingras ksislant Oirdor 

# RECEIVED MAR 

### 1 

## 6 2010 ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION



### RE: Supplemental Data to the

### Clark County Carbon Monoxide Redesignation Requestand Maintenance Plan (September

### 2008) On September 10, 2008, the Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management (DAQEM) submitted the 

### Clark County Carbon Monoxide Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan to the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP). On September 18, 2008, NDEP forwarded the plan to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and requested that EPA approve it as part of the Nevada State Implementation Plan. NDEP also asked that EPA redesignate the Las Vegas Valley nonattainment area to attainment status for the carbon monoxide (CO) National Ambient Air Quality Standards. For approval, EPA requires additional evidence of adoption, appropriate public notice, and stakeholder participation in changes to the CO maintenance plan's control measures-in this case, the suspension of Section 54 (Cleaner BurningGasoline) of the Clark County Air Quality Regulations and the amendmentof Nevada Administrative Code § 590.065 to change the Reid Vapor Pressure for wintertime fuels sold in Clark County from 9 to 13.5pounds per squareinch. Enclosed are three hard copies and one electronic copy of the supporting documentation suspending Section 54 and amending 

### 5 590.065. Please retain one hard copy for your records and forward the remaining two hard copies with the electroniccopy to EPA. If you have any questionsregarding this revision, please contact RobertTekniepe at (702) 455-4063. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely,

Lewis Wallenmeyer Director Enclosures BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Rory Reid Choirmon . Susan Brager Vice.Chairman Larry Brown,Tom Collins, Chris Giunchiglioni, Steve Sisolak, Lawrence Weekly Virginia Valentine, PE, County Manager
### §197. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(o), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3380

Section, acts Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 853, 31 Stat. 1163; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309; Sept. 2, 1958, Pub. L. 85–857, §13(b), 72 Stat. 1264, related to contracts for care, maintenance, and treatment of insane members of Army.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
§ 902.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Records of the Joint Board.* For purposes of this part, the term “records of the Joint Board” means rules, statements, opinions, orders, memoranda, letters, reports, accounts, and other papers containing information in the possession of the Joint Board that constitute part of the Joint Board's official files.
( b ) *Unusual Circumstances.* For purposes of this part, “unusual circumstances” means, but only to the extent reasonably necessary for the proper processing of the particular request: ( 1 ) The need to search for and collect the requested records from other establishments that are separate from the Joint Board's office processing the request;
( 2 ) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records which are demanded in a single request; or
( 3 ) The need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, with another agency having a substantial interest in the determination of the request.
Table 21

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

 Central Valley Project - California

Monthly Diversions in AF 2012

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

CANALS

Contra Costa 6672 10959 10792 787 11993 20589 24787 25240 17525 8821 6736 5755 150656

Delta-Mendota 140204 109191 115509 54873 89283 122074 251069 267602 244451 241156 233849 179955 2049216

Actual Fed Dos Amigos 0

Madera 0 0 956 0 20470 47189 40606 21838 4255 0 0 0 135314

Friant-Kern 35447 37925 11738 8519 37522 87470 112524 89561 47245 34642 3925 0 506518

Corning 557 171 133 452 3051 4796 4548 4600 2995 1492 60 0 22855

Folsom-South 1541 1414 1561 1638 1845 2225 3023 2815 2380 2146 1589 1299 23476

Tehama-Colusa 8993 8938 4558 5298 43183 48481 62016 50068 22777 15487 2892 0 272691

CACHUMA PROJECT

Tecolete Tunnel 2193 2057 2251 1261 2321 2883 3079 3463 3341 3178 1919 994 28940

ORLAND PROJECT

Stony Creek 3190 0 0 310 14120 16689 18510 18141 15046 8043 500 0 94549

North Canal 974 0 0 20 4268 5500 6508 6813 5806 2912 197 0 32998

South Canal 2216 0 0 290 9852 11189 12002 11328 9240 5131 303 0 61551

SOLANO PROJECT

Putah South Canal 3289 4064 6958 7547 30290 34882 37552 34023 21029 10788 1329 3725 195476
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.205 Remedial action, voluntary action, and self-evaluation. ( a ) *Remedial action.* ( 1 ) If the Director finds that a recipient has discriminated against persons on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 or this subpart, the recipient shall take such remedial action as the Director deems necessary to overcome the effects of the discrimination.
( 2 ) Where a recipient is found to have discriminated against persons on the basis of handicap in violation of section 504 or this subpart and where another recipient exercises control over the recipient that has discriminated, the Director, where appropriate, may require either or both recipients to take remedial action.
( 3 ) The Director may, where necessary to overcome the effects of discrimination in violation of section 504 or this subpart, require a recipient to take remedial action ( i ) with respect to handicapped persons who are no longer participants in the recipient's program or activity but who were participants in the program when such discrimination occurred or
( ii ) with respect to handicapped persons who would have been participants in the program or activity had the discrimination not occurred.
( b ) *Voluntary action.* A recipient may take steps, in addition to any action that is required by this subpart, to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in the recipient's program or activity by qualified handicapped persons.
( c ) *Self-evaluation.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall, within one year of the effective date of this subpart: ( i ) Evaluate, with the assistance of interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, its current policies and practices and the effects thereof that do not or may not meet the requirements of this subpart;
( ii ) Modify, after consultation with interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, any policies and practices that do not meet the requirements of this subpart; and
( iii ) Take, after consultation with interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, appropriate remedial steps to eliminate the effects of any discrimination that resulted from adherence to these policies and practices.
( 2 ) A recipient that employs fifteen or more persons shall, for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section, maintain on file, make available for public inspection, and provide to the Director upon request: ( i ) A list of the interested persons consulted,
( ii ) a description of areas examined and any problems identified, and
( iii ) a description of any modifications made and of any remedial steps taken.
( 3 ) A recipient, whose application is approved after the effective date of this regulation, shall within one year of receipt of the Federal financial assistance, be required to comply with the provisions of this section.