alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BEFUT International Co.,
Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hongbo
Cao, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      October 9, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Hongbo CaoHongbo
      CaoChief Executive Officer (principal executive
  officer)









This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
July 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. PUTAH 

SOUTH

PUTAH 

CREEK

C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

664

1 130.68 654 -10 453 413 44 1 0.40 0.00

2 130.78 665 11 415 363 44 2 0.48 0.00

3 130.55 639 -26 454 421 44 2 0.58 0.00

4 130.73 659 20 497 441 44 2 0.50 0.00

5 130.68 654 -5 479 437 44 1 0.41 0.00

6 130.44 627 -27 480 449 44 1 0.36 0.00

7 130.48 631 4 477 430 44 1 0.30 0.00

8 130.37 620 -11 462 423 44 1 0.37 0.00

9 130.77 664 44 468 401 44 1 0.34 0.00

10 130.75 662 -2 479 435 44 1 0.32 0.00

11 130.65 650 -12 518 479 44 1 0.32 0.00

12 130.73 659 9 542 492 44 1 0.39 0.00

13 130.63 648 -11 527 488 44 1 0.40 0.00

14 130.65 650 2 501 455 44 1 0.36 0.00

15 130.62 646 -4 492 449 44 1 0.39 0.00

16 130.80 667 21 494 438 44 1 0.42 0.00

17 130.79 666 -1 522 477 44 2 0.44 0.00

18 130.68 654 -12 534 495 44 1 0.40 0.00

19 130.86 674 20 563 508 44 1 0.36 0.00

20 130.62 646 -28 558 527 44 1 0.40 0.00

21 130.88 676 30 565 505 44 1 0.38 0.00

22 130.84 671 -5 563 520 44 2 0.43 0.00

23 130.86 674 3 548 500 44 2 0.51 0.00

24 130.73 659 -15 582 544 44 2 0.45 0.00

25 130.88 676 17 628 574 44 1 0.26 0.00

26 130.80 667 -9 613 573 44 1 0.36 0.00

27 130.82 669 2 605 559 44 1 0.40 0.00

28 130.95 684 15 561 508 44 1 0.39 0.00

29 130.81 668 -16 536 499 44 1 0.36 0.00

30 130.84 671 3 504 456 44 2 0.42 0.00

31 130.81 668 -3 477 433 44 2 0.43 0.00

TOTALS 4 16,097 14,692 1,364 40 12.33 0.00

ACRE-FEET 4 31,928 29,142 2,705 79

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Putah South Canal 29,142

Putah Creek 2,705

Total 31,847

Precipitation

This month = 0.00

October 01, 2022 To date = 38.83

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Solano Daily Operations

Run Date: 8/10/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 708.69

 708.96

 709.22

 709.46

 709.72

 710.01

 710.30

 710.52

 710.71

 710.89

 711.04

 711.22

 711.32

 711.43

 711.58

 711.73

 711.86

 711.97

 712.20

 712.45

 712.66

 712.86

 713.02

 713.23

 713.48

 713.72

 713.98

 714.18

 714.40

 714.59

 711.50

 824

 832

 839

 846

 853

 861

 870

 877

 882

 888

 892

 898

 901

 904

 908

 913

 917

 920

 927

 935

 941

 947

 952

 958

 966

 974

 982

 989

 996

 1,002

 906

STORAGE

+7

+8

+7

+7

+7

+8

+9

+7

+5

+6

+4

+6

+3

+3

+4

+5

+4

+3

+7

+8

+6

+6

+5

+6

+8

+8

+8

+7

+7

+6

-96

CHANGE

5

5

5

5

5

5

6

5

4

4

3

4

3

3

3

4

3

3

5

5

4

4

4

4

5

5

5

5

5

4

-13

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 35

 0940

 1040

 0935

 0920

TIME

 .09

 .09

 .09

 .09

COPPER

 .46

 .51

 .46

 .48

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2009 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 3, 2009

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +89 117 0 65

ACRE-FEET +89 232 0 129

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 129

 129

 817

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Seattle      Bank. |

|   | Federal Home Loan Bank of      Seattle |                                                                     |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                   |                                                                     |   |
|   | By:                                    | /s/ Christina      J. Gehrke                                        |   |
|   |                                   | Christina J.      Gehrke                                                 |   |
|   |                                   | Senior Vice President, Chief      Accounting and Administrative Officer* |   |
|   |                                   |                                                                     |   |

|   | * | The Chief      Accounting and Administrative Officer for purposes of the Seattle Bank’s      disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial      reporting performs similar functions as a principal financial      officer. |
|--------|---|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### Samuel Leviten, Respondent, v. William Sandbank et al., Defendants. Michael Lessin, Appellant.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.
#### Pamela K. SPEER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-16143.

D.C. No. CV-03-00487-DKD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 14, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

Mark Ross Caldwell, Caldwell & Ober, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Michael A. Johns, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, Donna M. Montano, Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel, San Francisco, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Pamela Speer (“Speer”) appeals the district court’s affirmation of the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her claim for Social Security disability benefits.

*501Speer suffers from fibromyalgia. The ALJ found that the “claimant’s fibromyalgia with headaches and mild degenerative joint disease [were] severe impairments,” but that Speer’s allegations regarding her ailments were not entirely credible, and that “the claimant’s medically determinable fibromyalgia [did] not prevent her from performing her past relevant work as a medical claims processor ... and customer service representative.”

Speer’s first claim is that the ALJ erred by relying upon the opinion of a nonexamining physician who did not testify at the hearing. The ALJ, however, relied primarily on the opinion of an examining physician: Dr. Keith Cunningham.

Speer’s second claim is that the ALJ erred by rejecting the opinion of Speer’s treating physician. The ALJ must provide specific, legitimate reasons for rejecting a treating physician’s opinion to favor an examining physician’s opinion. *See Lester v. Chater,*81 F.3d 821, 830-31 (9th Cir.1995). One of the reasons cited by the ALJ for rejecting the opinion of Dr. Phillip Hipps, Speer’s treating physician, was lack of substantiation. Because Dr. Cunningham provided a brief explanation of his findings, where Dr. Hipps provided none, the ALJ’s decision is valid.

Speer’s final claim is that the ALJ erred in finding that Speer was not entirely credible. Credibility findings must be supported with specific, cogent reasons for the disbelief. *See Rashad v. Sullivan,*903 F.2d 1229, 1231 (9th Cir.1990). While not all of the ALJ’s bases for the credibility finding are cogent, evidence such as Speer’s ability to complete forms during the same examination in which she complained that her hands hurt too much to write substantiates the adverse credibility finding. When the record does not compel a contrary finding, we uphold the ALJ’s determination. *See Andrews v. Shalala,*53 F.3d 1035, 1039-40 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 446.51

 446.41

 446.10

 446.00

 446.32

 446.09

 445.96

 445.92

 446.03

 445.47

 445.54

 445.97

 466.02

 446.01

 446.07

 446.39

 445.75

 445.97

 445.70

 445.78

 446.03

 446.10

 446.65

 446.86

 447.17

 448.18

 448.71

 449.27

 449.11

 449.33

 448.96

 937,871

 936,892

 933,857

 932,879

 936,010

 933,760

 932,488

 932,097

 933,173

 927,701

 928,385

 932,586

 933,075

 932,977

 933,564

 936,696

 930,436

 932,586

 929,947

 930,729

 933,173

 933,857

 939,243

 941,302

 944,344

 954,279

 959,506

 965,040

 963,458

 965,633

 961,975

STORAGE

-1,372

-979

-3,035

-978

+3,131

-2,250

-1,272

-391

+1,076

-5,472

+684

+4,201

+489

-98

+587

+3,132

-6,260

+2,150

-2,639

+782

+2,444

+684

+5,386

+2,059

+3,042

+9,935

+5,227

+5,534

-1,582

+2,175

-3,658

CHANGE

2,036

1,406

791

1,407

2,105

787

787

959

1,381

780

972

2,558

1,407

879

1,583

2,190

1,575

1,407

1,579

1,578

1,991

969

3,135

2,192

2,047

5,446

3,048

2,845

1,563

2,434

0

PUMPING

 1,583

 1,812

 2,036

 1,659

 0

 1,977

 1,214

 680

 607

 3,270

 0

 0

 1,124

 603

 825

 0

 4,655

 0

 2,577

 964

 603

 0

 0

 1,206

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,423

 1,376

 1,834

POWER

 110

 183

 176

 214

 195

 153

 176

 208

 237

 264

 278

 273

 266

 276

 278

 249

 266

 260

 245

 234

 250

 231

 206

 207

 214

 217

 226

 63

 0

 0

 116

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-1,035

+96

-108

-27

-332

+208

-39

-268

+6

-5

-348

-167

+229

-49

-184

-362

+190

-63

-87

+15

+94

-393

-214

+260

-299

-220

-187

+7

+63

+39

+106

OR

 121

 123

 95

 92

 95

 111

 120

 126

 126

 126

 130

 95

 95

 95

 95

 120

 82

 63

 117

 76

 82

 95

 105

 80

 73

 83

 80

 74

 96

 112

 48

C.F.S.

 .38

 .39

 .30

 .29

 .30

 .35

 .38

 .40

 .40

 .40

 .41

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .38

 .26

 .20

 .37

 .24

 .26

 .30

 .33

 .25

 .23

 .26

 .25

 .23

 .30

 .35

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR November 24, 2003

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2003 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +22,732 53,837 33,028 6,271 0 -3,074 3,031 9.56 .08

ACRE-FEET +22,732 106,786 65,511 12,439 0 -6,097 6,012

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 65,511

PACHECO TUNNEL 12,439 TOTAL 77,950

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = .43

 939,243

SPILL 0 .08

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,039.36

 1,039.65

 1,039.85

 1,040.25

 1,040.65

 1,041.13

 1,041.58

 1,041.89

 1,042.17

 1,042.40

 1,042.64

 1,042.84

 1,043.03

 1,043.17

 1,043.30

 1,043.37

 1,043.41

 1,043.56

 1,043.43

 1,043.35

 1,043.22

 1,043.13

 1,042.94

 1,042.62

 1,042.28

 1,041.74

 1,041.30

 1,040.86

 1,040.40

 1,039.84

 3,775.6

 3,783.3

 3,788.6

 3,799.2

 3,809.8

 3,822.5

 3,834.5

 3,842.7

 3,850.2

 3,856.4

 3,862.8

 3,868.1

 3,873.2

 3,877.0

 3,880.4

 3,882.3

 3,883.4

 3,887.4

 3,883.9

 3,881.8

 3,878.3

 3,875.9

 3,870.8

 3,862.2

 3,853.1

 3,838.7

 3,827.0

 3,815.4

 3,803.2

 3,788.4

STORAGE

+4.5

+7.7

+5.3

+10.6

+10.6

+12.7

+12.0

+8.2

+7.5

+6.1

+6.4

+5.3

+5.1

+3.8

+3.5

+1.9

+1.1

+4.0

-3.5

-2.1

-3.5

-2.4

-5.1

-8.6

-9.1

-14.4

-11.7

-11.7

-12.2

-14.8

CHANGE

 7,877

 7,974

 7,663

 9,694

 10,042

 11,200

 10,747

 9,593

 9,444

 8,458

 8,136

 7,995

 7,329

 6,535

 6,726

 5,808

 6,412

 6,953

 5,041

 5,079

 4,854

 6,311

 4,676

 4,734

 4,603

 4,162

 4,024

 4,858

 4,304

 3,651

INFLOW

 5,522

 4,008

 4,867

 4,338

 4,688

 4,692

 4,593

 5,301

 5,489

 5,217

 4,744

 5,063

 4,593

 4,441

 4,760

 4,718

 5,704

 4,795

 6,667

 6,004

 6,377

 7,254

 7,000

 8,691

 9,066

 11,226

 9,651

 10,500

 10,170

 10,893

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 85

 93

 125

 16

 16

 94

 118

 134

 189

 142

 158

 237

 174

 198

 206

 142

 166

 127

 134

 158

 237

 276

 245

 355

 118

 196

 274

 250

 273

 233

C.F.S.

 .11

 .12

 .16

 .02

 .02

 .12

 .15

 .17

 .24

 .18

 .20

 .30

 .22

 .25

 .26

 .18

 .21

 .16

 .17

 .20

 .30

 .35

 .31

 .45

 .15

 .25

 .35

 .32

 .35

 .30

INCHES

 .49

 .03

 .00

 .04

 1.24

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2013 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 30, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +17.2 204,883 191,032 0 0 5,169 6.57 1.84

ACRE-FEET +17,200 406,385 378,912 0 0 10,253

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 378,912

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 378,912

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.84

JULY 1, 2012 44.72

 3,771.1

Table 3
§ 663.510 Who is responsible for managing the eligible provider process? ( a ) The State and the Local Boards each have responsibilities for managing the eligible provider process.
( b ) The Governor must establish eligibility criteria for certain providers to become initially eligible and must set minimum levels of performance for all providers to remain subsequently eligible.
( c ) The Governor must designate a State agency (called the “designated State agency”) to assist in carrying out WIA section 122. The designated State agency is responsible for: ( 1 ) Developing and maintaining the State list of eligible providers and programs, which is comprised of lists submitted by Local Boards;
( 2 ) Determining if programs meet performance levels, including verifying the accuracy of the information on the State list in consultation with the Local Boards, removing programs that do not meet program performance levels, and taking appropriate enforcement actions, against providers in the case of the intentional provision of inaccurate information, as described in WIA section 122(f)(1), and in the case of a substantial violation of the requirements of WIA, as described in WIA section 122(f)(2);
( 3 ) Disseminating the State list, accompanied by performance and cost information relating to each provider, to One-Stop operators throughout the State.
( d ) The Local Board must: ( 1 ) Accept applications for initial eligibility from certain postsecondary institutions and entities providing apprenticeship training;
( 2 ) Carry out procedures prescribed by the Governor to assist in determining the initial eligibility of other providers;
( 3 ) Carry out procedures prescribed by the Governor to assist in determining the subsequent eligibility of all providers;
( 4 ) Compile a local list of eligible providers, collect the performance and cost information and any other required information relating to providers;
( 5 ) Submit the local list and information to the designated State agency;
( 6 ) Ensure the dissemination and appropriate use of the State list through the local One-Stop system;
( 7 ) Consult with the designated State agency in cases where termination of an eligible provider is contemplated because inaccurate information has been provided; and
( 8 ) Work with the designated State agency in cases where the termination of an eligible provider is contemplated because of violations of the Act.
( e ) The Local Board may: ( 1 ) Make recommendations to the Governor on the procedures to be used in determining initial eligibility of certain providers;
( 2 ) Increase the levels of performance required by the State for local providers to maintain subsequent eligibility;
( 3 ) Require additional verifiable program-specific information from local providers to maintain subsequent eligibility.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T07:35:05-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 840.43

 840.19

 840.17

 840.15

 840.26

 840.25

 840.10

 839.85

 839.70

 839.66

 839.41

 840.08

 839.98

 839.63

 839.29

 838.98

 839.07

 839.12

 839.12

 839.12

 839.18

 839.08

 838.92

 838.70

 838.43

 838.21

 838.44

 839.40

 839.83

 839.97

 49.65

 49.34

 49.31

 49.29

 49.43

 49.42

 49.22

 48.90

 48.71

 48.66

 48.34

 49.20

 49.07

 48.62

 48.19

 47.80

 47.91

 47.98

 47.98

 47.98

 48.05

 47.93

 47.72

 47.45

 47.11

 46.83

 47.12

 48.33

 48.88

 49.06

STORAGE

-0.18

-0.31

-0.03

-0.03

+0.14

-0.01

-0.19

-0.32

-0.19

-0.05

-0.32

+0.85

-0.13

-0.45

-0.43

-0.39

+0.11

+0.06

+0.00

+0.00

+0.08

-0.13

-0.20

-0.28

-0.34

-0.28

+0.29

+1.21

+0.55

+0.18

CHANGE

533

468

611

612

697

621

529

468

536

519

476

1,060

2,170

1,258

990

821

696

676

655

655

691

585

550

502

470

502

472

1,059

923

727

INFLOW

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 1,622

 866

 589

 402

 20

 25

 34

 34

 40

 36

 25

 20

 20

 20

 20

 38

 28

 20

SPILL

 607

 604

 607

 607

 607

 607

 607

 607

 607

 523

 615

 615

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 613

 299

 403

 611

 611

OUTLET

 2

 5

 2

 3

 3

 6

 4

 7

 10

 7

 6

 0

 0

 3

 6

 5

 6

 6

 8

 8

 0

 0

 14

 8

 7

 8

 8

 8

 8

 6

C.F.S.

 .05

 .12

 .05

 .08

 .08

 .15

 .11

 .17

 .25

 .18

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .15

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .19

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .36

 .19

 .17

 .20

 .20

 .20

 .20

 .15

INCHES

 .17

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .42

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 2.14

 .40

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .40

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2010 RUN DATE: 05/01/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.79 21,532 17,719 4,039 164 4.12 4.01

ACRE-FEET -790 42,709 35,146 8,011 325

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 8,011

OUTLET

TOTAL

 35,146

 43,157

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.01

JULY 1, 2009 24.44

 49.83

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
§ 618.750 Maximum amount of Basic Trade Readjustment Allowances. ( a ) *General rule.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the maximum amount of Basic TRA payable to an AAW is the product of 52 multiplied by the TRA weekly amount for a week of total unemployment, calculated under § 618.745(a) (weekly amounts of TRA), reduced by the total sum of UI (except State-funded additional compensation) that the AAW was entitled or would have been entitled to had the worker applied in such worker's first benefit period.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The maximum amount of TRA determined under paragraph (a) of this section does not include: ( 1 ) The amount of dependents' allowances paid as a supplement to the base weekly amount determined under § 618.745; or
( 2 ) The amount of the difference between the AAW's weekly increased allowances determined under § 618.745(b) and such worker's weekly amount determined under § 618.745(a).
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 79 27 74 57.7 48.6 49.9 11.3 10.1 11.0

2 76 73 74 52.2 49.9 51.1 11.2 10.6 10.9

3 75 72 74 53.3 51.4 52.4 11.0 10.5 10.7

4 76 73 74 53.6 51.6 52.6 10.8 10.4 10.6

5 76 73 74 53.3 51.4 52.3 10.9 10.4 10.6

6 77 73 74 52.7 51.1 52.0 10.8 10.4 10.5

7 79 74 75 52.2 50.3 51.3 10.9 10.4 10.6

8 76 74 75 51.4 49.9 50.6 11.0 10.6 10.8

9 77 74 75 49.6 48.3 49.0 11.3 10.7 11.0

10 76 74 75 48.5 46.8 47.7 11.6 11.1 11.3

11 76 74 75 47.9 45.9 47.0 11.6 11.3 11.4

12 76 73 75 47.8 45.8 46.9 11.6 11.3 11.4

13 77 74 75 47.6 45.7 46.8 11.7 11.3 11.4

14 77 74 75 48.0 45.9 47.0 11.8 11.3 11.5

15 77 74 75 48.4 46.3 47.4 11.7 11.3 11.5

16 78 74 76 48.3 46.2 47.3 11.7 11.3 11.4

17 81 74 76 48.3 46.8 47.6 11.6 11.1 11.3

18 87 75 77 50.5 48.2 49.4 11.1 10.6 10.9

19 81 73 75 53.4 50.4 52.1 10.6 10.0 10.3

20 90 75 77 54.4 53.3 53.8 9.9 9.6 9.8

21 81 78 79 55.0 53.5 54.2 9.7 8.9 9.5

22 90 79 83 55.1 53.1 54.1 9.7 9.3 9.6

23 94 90 92 53.7 52.0 53.0 10.2 9.6 9.9

24 90 86 88 51.7 50.4 51.0 10.8 10.1 10.5

25 87 83 85 51.4 49.3 50.4 11.1 10.5 10.8

26 84 82 83 51.3 49.7 50.6 11.1 10.6 10.8

27 88 81 83 51.5 49.9 50.8 11.0 10.5 10.7

28 86 80 81 52.9 50.9 52.0 11.0 10.4 10.6

29 105 80 82 54.2 51.8 53.0 10.8 10.0 10.4

30 85 79 80 54.9 53.4 54.2 10.3 9.7 10.0

31 89 77 81 54.6 53.6 54.1 10.4 9.4 9.9

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: December 2023 Run Date: 1/16/2024