alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2.220 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains the regulations of the Department of the Interior implementing section 3 of the Privacy Act. Sections 2.47 through 2.57 describe the procedures and policies of the Department concerning maintenance of records which are subject to the Act. Sections 2.60 through 2.66 describe the procedure under which individuals may determine whether systems of records subject to the Act contain records relating to them and the procedure under which they may seek access to existing records. Sections 2.70 through 2.77 describe the procedure under which individuals may petition for amendment of records subject to the Act relating to them. Section 2.79 lists records systems that have been exempted from certain requirements of the Act.

[48 FR 56583, Dec. 22, 1983]
Exhibit 32**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of InferX Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), each of the undersignedofficers of the Company, hereby certify that to such officer’s knowledge:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       Dated:April 16, 2007               By:      /s/ B.K. Gogia                  B.K. Gogia           Chief Executive Officer         Dated:April 16, 2007               By:      /s/ Scott B. Parliament                  Scott B. Parliament           Chief Financial Officer       The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separatedisclosure document.
### SUBCHAPTER I—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL EDUCATIONAL AGENCIES FOR THE EDUCATION OF INDIAN CHILDREN
### [§§506, 507. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. E, title II, §§52006(a), 52007(a), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 882]

Section 506, added Pub. L. 105–178, title V, §5106, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 433; amended Pub. L. 109–59, title V, §5206(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1795, related to international highway transportation outreach program.

A prior section 506, added Pub. L. 90–495, §30, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 832; amended Pub. L. 91–605, title I, §137, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1735, related to replacement housing, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 91–646, title II, §220(a)(10), Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1903.

Section 507, added Pub. L. 105–178, title V, §5107, June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 434; amended Pub. L. 109–59, title V, §5207(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1797, related to surface transportation-environmental cooperative research program.

A prior section 507, added Pub. L. 90–495, §30, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 832, related to expenses incidental to transfer of property, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 91–646, title II, §220(a)(10), Jan. 2, 1971, 84 Stat. 1903.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
#### In the Matter of Plessdore Realty Corp., Appellant. Nicholas M. Fasano et al., Respondents.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Lewis, P. J., Cars-well, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 820.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 829.70

 829.10

 828.40

 827.82

 827.23

 826.63

 826.07

 825.48

 824.83

 824.23

 823.88

 823.82

 823.77

 823.74

 823.72

 823.69

 823.66

 823.63

 823.59

 823.56

 823.54

 823.51

 823.45

 823.39

 823.34

 823.30

 823.26

 823.23

 823.20

 823.16

 823.14

 36.88

 36.22

 35.47

 34.85

 34.23

 33.61

 33.03

 32.43

 31.77

 31.17

 30.83

 30.78

 30.72

 30.69

 30.67

 30.64

 30.61

 30.58

 30.54

 30.51

 30.49

 30.46

 30.40

 30.34

 30.30

 30.26

 30.22

 30.19

 30.16

 30.12

 30.10

STORAGE

-0.52

-0.65

-0.75

-0.62

-0.62

-0.63

-0.58

-0.60

-0.66

-0.60

-0.35

-0.05

-0.06

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.03

-0.06

-0.06

-0.05

-0.04

-0.04

-0.03

-0.03

-0.04

-0.02

CHANGE

59

-10

-64

5

-4

-8

11

2

-25

4

0

38

20

18

30

25

20

20

15

20

25

19

3

5

12

15

15

15

16

11

21

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

SPILL

 281

 281

 281

 281

 280

 280

 279

 278

 277

 276

 147

 39

 26

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

OUTLET

 18

 18

 15

 15

 10

 12

 8

 13

 14

 15

 13

 14

 14

 7

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 13

 11

 14

 16

 14

 14

 9

 10

 10

 10

C.F.S.

 .52

 .52

 .45

 .45

 .30

 .35

 .23

 .40

 .42

 .47

 .42

 .45

 .43

 .21

 .43

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .42

 .35

 .45

 .51

 .45

 .45

 .30

 .31

 .32

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JULY 2018 RUN DATE: 08/08/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -7.32 333 3,294 315 405 12.63 .00

ACRE-FEET -7,320 661 6,534 625 803

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 625

OUTLET

TOTAL

 6,534

 7,159

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2018 .00

 37.39

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 9.71
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John Bennett, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this annual report of Probe Manufacturing, Inc.;



2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of

a  material  fact  or  omit  to state a material fact necessary to make the

statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements

were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to  the period covered by this

report;



3.   Based on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial

information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in  all material

respects  the  financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of

the  registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods presented in this report;



4.   The registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for

establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined

in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such

disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our

supervision,  to  ensure  that  material  information  relating to the

registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to

us  by others within those entities, particularly during the period in

which  this  report  is  being  prepared;



b)   evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's  disclosure

controls  and  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions

about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as

of  the  end  of  the  period  covered  by  this  report based on such

evaluation;  and



c)   disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal

control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's

most  recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in

the  case  of  an  annual  report) that has materially affected, or is

reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the registrant's internal

control  over  financial  reporting;  and



5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on

our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to

the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board

of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent  functions):



a)   all significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in  the

design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which

are  reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to

record,  process,  summarize  and  report  financial  information; and



b)   any fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves  management or

other  employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in the registrant's

internal  control  over  financial  reporting.







DATED  this  26th  day  of  March 2007.





/s/  John Bennett

-------------------------------

John Bennett

Chief Financial Officer
Order entered December 16 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00212 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00213 - CR JOE POLANCO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 401 - 81063 - 2011 , 401 - 80435 - 2012



### O RDER T he Court DENIES appellant’s December 15, 2015 pro se motion to stay mandate

. /s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 827.75

 827.75

 827.69

 827.69

 827.68

 827.67

 827.67

 827.67

 827.65

 827.65

 827.63

 827.62

 827.58

 827.56

 827.56

 827.54

 827.51

 827.48

 827.45

 827.40

 827.36

 827.33

 827.31

 827.25

 827.22

 827.18

 827.15

 827.13

 827.09

 827.05

 827.00

 34.78

 34.78

 34.72

 34.72

 34.71

 34.70

 34.70

 34.70

 34.68

 34.68

 34.66

 34.64

 34.60

 34.58

 34.58

 34.56

 34.53

 34.50

 34.47

 34.41

 34.37

 34.34

 34.32

 34.26

 34.22

 34.18

 34.15

 34.13

 34.09

 34.05

 33.99

STORAGE

+0.01

+0.00

-0.06

+0.00

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.01

-0.04

-0.02

+0.00

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.06

-0.03

-0.04

-0.03

-0.02

-0.04

-0.04

-0.05

CHANGE

49

43

10

41

35

37

40

40

29

41

28

35

21

31

43

32

27

27

26

18

22

25

26

8

23

18

23

31

21

19

13

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

SPILL

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 17

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 12

 16

 15

 15

 15

 16

 16

 16

 16

OUTLET

 16

 16

 15

 14

 14

 15

 13

 13

 13

 14

 12

 14

 15

 15

 17

 17

 17

 17

 16

 18

 17

 15

 15

 14

 14

 14

 14

 16

 16

 14

 14

C.F.S.

 .47

 .46

 .44

 .42

 .42

 .44

 .37

 .39

 .39

 .40

 .37

 .41

 .43

 .45

 .51

 .50

 .49

 .49

 .47

 .53

 .51

 .45

 .45

 .42

 .42

 .43

 .42

 .47

 .49

 .43

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2009 RUN DATE: 08/05/2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.74 882 503 310 464 13.75 .00

ACRE-FEET -740 1,749 998 615 920

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 615

OUTLET

TOTAL

 998

 1,613

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2009 .00

 34.77

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### § 725.480 Modification of decisions and orders.

A party who is dissatisfied with a decision and order which has become final in accordance with § 725.479 may request a modification of the decision and order if the conditions set forth in § 725.310 are met.
### §7671. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out this chapter and the amendments made by this chapter $48,000,000,000 for the 5-year period beginning on October 1, 2008.

#### (b) Availability

Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations in subsection (a) are authorized to remain available until expended.

#### (c) Availability of authorizations

Authorizations of appropriations under subsection (a) shall remain available until the appropriations are made.

(Pub. L. 108–25, title IV, §401, May 27, 2003, 117 Stat. 745; Pub. L. 110–293, title IV, §401(a), July 30, 2008, 122 Stat. 2966.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (a), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 108–25, May 27, 2003, 117 Stat. 711, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 7601 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–293 substituted "$48,000,000,000 for the 5-year period beginning on October 1, 2008" for "$3,000,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2004 through 2008".
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4500 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to permit certain depository 

institutions to use a short form call report, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2016 

Mr. HULTGREN (for himself, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, and Mr. LUETKEMEYER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to permit certain depository institutions to use a short form call report, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Bank Re5 porting Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHORT FORM CALL REPORT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7(a) of the Federal De8 posit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(a)) is amended by 

9 adding at the end the following: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4500 IH

1 ‘‘(12) SHORT FORM REPORTING.— 

2 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The appropriate Fed3 eral banking agencies shall issue regulations al4 lowing for a reduced reporting requirement for 

5 covered depository institutions when making the 

6 first and third report of condition for a year, as 

7 required pursuant to paragraph (3). 

8 ‘‘(B) COVERED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTION

9 DEFINED.—For purposes of this paragraph, the 

10 term ‘covered depository institution’ means an 

11 insured depository institution that— 

12 ‘‘(i) is highly rated and well capital13 ized (as defined under section 38(b)); and 

14 ‘‘(ii) satisfies such other criteria as 

15 the appropriate Federal banking agencies 

16 determine appropriate.’’. 

17 (b) REPORT TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 180 days 

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 365 

19 days thereafter until the appropriate Federal banking 

20 agencies (as defined under section 3 of the Federal De21 posit Insurance Act) have issued the regulations required 

22 under section 7(a)(12)(A) of the Federal Deposit Insur23 ance Act, such agencies shall submit to the Committee on 

24 Financial Services of the House of Representatives and 

25 the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4500 IH

1 of the Senate a report describing the progress made in 

2 issuing such regulations. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0207 SAT Date: 1/18/2013 Print Date: 4/1/2013

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR/CORROSION, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS-DERMAL/RESPIRATORY, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0200-09 FATE: Estimations for MW 441 Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 5.01 (E) S = Disp. / 1.38 mg /L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.86 (E)log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.82 (E) POTW removal (%) = 75-90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strong PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

Health : Health Summary: : Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. There is concern for irritation and p ossible corrosion based on the and concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and the surfactant properties of the PMN material. There is also uncertain concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization based on smaller . Moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.51 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.088 green algal 96-h EC50 0.035 fish

_ chronic value 0.010 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.010

algal

_ chronic value 0.015
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for with molecular weight adjustment; SAR chemical class = ; MW 335 (major component); liquid; log Kow = 5.20 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs iincludes molecualr weight adjustment SAR Class Ecotox CategoryEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
§ 718.202 Determining the existence of pneumoconiosis. ( a ) A finding of the existence of pneumoconiosis may be made as follows in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section: ( 1 ) A chest X-ray conducted and classified in accordance with § 718.102 may form the basis for a finding of the existence of pneumoconiosis. Except as otherwise provided in this section, where two or more X-ray reports are in conflict, in evaluating such X-ray reports consideration must be given to the radiological qualifications of the physicians interpreting such X-rays (*see* § 718.102(d)).
( 2 ) A biopsy or autopsy conducted and reported in compliance with § 718.106 may be the basis for a finding of the existence of pneumoconiosis. A finding in an autopsy or biopsy of anthracotic pigmentation, however, must not be considered sufficient, by itself, to establish the existence of pneumoconiosis. A report of autopsy must be accepted unless there is evidence that the report is not accurate or that the claim has been fraudulently represented.
( 3 ) If the presumptions described in § 718.304 or § 718.305 are applicable, it must be presumed that the miner is or was suffering from pneumoconiosis.
( 4 ) A determination of the existence of pneumoconiosis may also be made if a physician, exercising sound medical judgment, notwithstanding a negative X-ray, finds that the miner suffers or suffered from pneumoconiosis as defined in § 718.201. Any such finding must be based on objective medical evidence such as blood-gas studies, electrocardiograms, pulmonary function studies, physical performance tests, physical examination, and medical and work histories. Such a finding must be supported by a reasoned medical opinion.
( b ) A claim for benefits must not be denied solely on the basis of a negative chest X-ray.
( c ) A determination of the existence of pneumoconiosis must not be made— ( 1 ) Solely on the basis of a living miner's statements or testimony; or
( 2 ) In a claim involving a deceased miner, solely on the basis of the affidavit(s) (or equivalent testimony) of the claimant and/or his or her dependents who would be eligible for augmentation of the claimant's benefits if the claim were approved.
[79 FR 21612, Apr. 17, 2014]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Richard H. De Voto, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Resources
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  1)
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2004, (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2)
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. Date: November 15, 2004
    /s/ Richard H. De VotoRichard H. De VotoChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              MARWICH II, LTD.
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2000, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Porath,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6422
KEVIN M. BALLANCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus B. KISER, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-00-116) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin M. Ballance, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kevin M. Ballance, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Ballance v. Kiser , No. CA-00-116 (W.D. Va. Feb. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §441. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title XIV, §1410(b)(3), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1266

Section, Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XV, §1542, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1736, related to authorization of appropriations for United States Soldiers' and Airmen's Home.