alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99


PRESS RELEASE                                                         ROSTELECOM


       FINANCE MINISTRY'S WRITE-OFF OF ROSTELECOM'S REMAINING LIABILITIES
               WILL PRODUCE APPROX. USD 24 MILLION POSITIVE IMPACT
                         ON FIRST-HALF 2003 IAS RESULTS


Moscow - October 1, 2003 - Rostelecom (NYSE: ROS; RTS: RTKM), Russia's national
long-distance telecommunications operator, today welcomed the decision by
Russia's Ministry of Finance to write off approximately USD 24 million in
penalties and fines remaining on the Yen-denominated debt that Rostelecom
restructured earlier this year.

This development brings Rostelecom's financial restructuring program another
step towards its objective of a transparent balance sheet and high quality debt.
The Ministry of Finance's write-off will result in a profit for Rostelecom of
approximately USD 24 million in the Company's IAS financial statements for the
first six months of 2003.

The Ministry of Finance's resolution of September 16 writes off the fines and
penalties still remaining on the previously-restructured debt. In June 2003,
Rostelecom restructured its overdue Yen-denominated debt (principal and accrued
interest) to the Ministry of Finance totaling an equivalent of approximately USD
100 million by converting it into promissory notes issued to Alfa-Bank. As a
result, Rostelecom's principal debt to the Ministry of Finance and accrued
interest were repaid in full, and the Company ceased to be in technical default.
The transaction also improved the structure of Rostelecom's balance sheet as
previously its obligations to the Ministry of Finance were reported in the
financial statements as short-term debt. The promissory notes, which have a
total nominal value of USD 98.6 million and carry an interest rate of 5.94%, are
repayable to Alfa-Bank within 36 months in six semi-annual installments.



For further details please contact

Anna Kareva
Head of IR
Tel.: + 7 095 973 9920
Fax: + 7 095 787 2850
e-mail: kareva@hq.rt.ru
### §9651. Establishment of risk and audit committees

#### (a) In general

To assist the Board to fulfill its duties and responsibilities under section 9621(a) of this title, the Corporation shall establish a risk committee and an audit committee.

#### (b) Duties and responsibilities of risk committee

Subject to the direction of the Board, the risk committee established under subsection (a) shall have oversight responsibility of—

(1) formulating risk management policies of the operations of the Corporation;

(2) reviewing and providing guidance on operation of the Corporation's global risk management framework;

(3) developing policies for enterprise risk management, monitoring, and management of strategic, reputational, regulatory, operational, developmental, environmental, social, and financial risks;

(4) developing the risk profile of the Corporation, including a risk management and compliance framework and governance structure to support such framework; and

(5) developing policies and procedures for assessing, prior to providing, and for any period during which the Corporation provides, support to any foreign entities, whether such entities have in place sufficient enhanced due diligence policies and practices to prevent money laundering and corruption to ensure the Corporation does not provide support to persons that are—

(A) knowingly engaging in acts of corruption;

(B) knowingly providing material or financial support for terrorism, drug trafficking, or human trafficking; or

(C) responsible for ordering or otherwise directing serious or gross violations of human rights.

#### (c) Duties and responsibilities of audit committee

Subject to the direction of the Board, the audit committee established under subsection (a) shall have the oversight responsibility of—

(1) the integrity of the Corporation's financial reporting and systems of internal controls regarding finance and accounting;

(2) the integrity of the Corporation's financial statements;

(3) the performance of the Corporation's internal audit function; and

(4) compliance with legal and regulatory requirements related to the finances of the Corporation.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. F, title IV, §1441, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3503.)
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 
 Michael
        V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Realty Mortgage I, Inc.
        (the
“Registrant”) , and John Alderfer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
        hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that:
 
 (1)  the
        Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the twelve months ended December 31, 2006,
        as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or
        Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
 
 Date:
        March 13, 2007
 
 
 /s/
                  Michael V. ShustekMichael
                  V. ShustekChief
                  Executive Officerof
                  Vestin Realty Mortgage I, Inc.
 
 
 
 Date:
        March 13 2007
 
 
 /s/John
                  AlderferJohn
                  AlderferChief
                  Financial Officerof
                  Vestin Realty Mortgage I, Inc.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Iowa First  Bancshares  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kim K.
Bartling, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Kim K. Bartling
----------------------------------------
Kim K. Bartling
Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer & Treasurer

August 14, 2003


                                       1
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-08-00517-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE SAN JUANITA SANDOVAL MORENO

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Emergency Motion.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

1

Relator, San Juanita Sandoval Moreno, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an

“Emergency Motion to Stay Court-Ordered Mediation and Real Party’s Motion to Quash

Notices of Deposition by Written Questions Pending Outcome of Mandamus Petition” in

the above cause on August 29, 2008. On September 2, 2008, the real party in interest,

Ismael Moran, misnamed herein as “respondent,” filed a reply. The Court, having

examined and fully considered the emergency motion, the petition for writ of mandamus,
2

and the reply thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion are

DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this 3 day of September, 2008. rd
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


November 21, 2018


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 410 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on November 20, 2018, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-227457) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


		Very truly yours,
		/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
		Gerardo Cipriano
		Vice President
§ 701.501 What is a recreational vessel? ( a ) *Recreational vessel* means a vessel— ( 1 ) Being manufactured or operated primarily for pleasure; or
( 2 ) Leased, rented, or chartered to another for the latter's pleasure.
( b ) In applying the definition in paragraph (a) of this section, the following rules apply: ( 1 ) A vessel being *manufactured* or *built,* or being repaired under warranty by its manufacturer or builder, is a *recreational vessel* if the vessel appears intended, based on its design and construction, to be for ultimate recreational uses. The manufacturer or builder bears the burden of establishing that a vessel is recreational under this standard.
( 2 ) A vessel being *repaired, dismantled for repair,* or *dismantled at the end of its life* is not a *recreational vessel* if the vessel had been operating, around the time of its repair or dismantling, in one or more of the following categories on more than an infrequent basis— ( A ) “Passenger vessel” as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(22);
( B ) “Small passenger vessel” as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(35);
( C ) “Uninspected passenger vessel” as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(42);
( D ) Vessel routinely engaged in “commercial service” as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(5); or
( E ) Vessel that routinely carries “passengers for hire” as defined by 46 U.S.C. 2101(21a).
( 3 ) Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a vessel will be deemed recreational if it is a *public vessel, i.e.,* a vessel owned or bareboat-chartered and operated by the United States, or by a State or political subdivision thereof, at the time of repair, dismantling for repair, or dismantling, provided that such vessel shares elements of design and construction with traditional recreational vessels and is not normally engaged in a military, commercial or traditionally commercial undertaking.
( c ) All subsequent amendments to the statutes referenced in paragraph (b)(2) of this section and the regulations implementing those provisions in Title 46 of the Code of Federal Regulations will apply when determining whether a vessel is recreational.
[76 FR 82128, Dec. 30, 2011]
(No. 6693

#### Honeywell, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1972.*

Honeywell, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
§ 2.248 Petitions for amendments: Time limits for processing. ( a ) *Acknowledgement of receipt.* The acknowledgement of receipt of a petition required by § 2.72(c) shall be dispatched not later than ten (10) working days after receipt of the petition by the system manager responsible for the system containing the challenged record, unless a decision on the petition has been previously dispatched.
( b ) *Decision on petition.* A petition for amendment shall be processed promptly. A determination whether to accept or reject the petition for amendment shall be made within thirty (30) working days after receipt of the petition by the system manager responsible for the system containing the challenged record.
( c ) *Suspension of time limit.* The thirty (30) day time limit for a decision on a petition shall be suspended if it is necessary to notify the petitioner, pursuant to § 2.72(d), that additional information in support of the petition is required. Running of the thirty (30) day time limit shall resume on receipt of the additional information by the system manager responsible for the system containing the challenged record.
( d ) *Extensions of time.* ( 1 ) The thirty (30) day time limit for a decision on a petition may be extended if the official responsible for making a decision on the petition determines that an extension is necessary for one of the following reasons: ( i ) A decision on the petition requires analysis of voluminous record or records;
( ii ) Some or all of the challenged records must be collected from facilities other than the facility at which the official responsible for making the decision is located.
( iii ) Some or all of the challenged records are of concern to another bureau of the Department or another agency of the Federal Government whose assistance and views are being sought in processing the request.
( 2 ) If the official responsible for making a decision on the petition determines that an extension is necessary, the official shall promptly inform the petitioner of the extension and the date on which a decision is expected to be dispatched.
[40 FR 44505, Sept. 26, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 56586, Dec. 22, 1983; 53 FR 3750, Feb. 9, 1988]
### §4155. Conversion of certain positions in Department of Agriculture

#### (a) Designation and classification of positions to be occupied; notice

Not later than 15 days after February 15, 1981, the Secretary of Agriculture shall—

(1) designate and classify under section 3981 of this title those positions in the Foreign Agricultural Service under the General Schedule described in section 5332 of title 5 which the Secretary of Agriculture determines are to be occupied by career members of the Foreign Service, and

(2) provide written notice to individuals holding those positions of such designation and classification of the personnel category under section 3903 of this title which will apply to such individual.

#### (b) Election to convert

Each employee serving in a position at the time it is designated under subsection (a) shall, not later than 120 days after notice of such designation, elect—

(1) to accept conversion to the Foreign Service, in which case such employee shall be converted in accordance with the provisions of subsection (c); or

(2) to decline conversion to the Foreign Service and have the provisions of subsection (d) apply.

#### (c) Recommendations for appointment

(1) The Secretary of Agriculture shall recommend to the President for appointment to the appropriate class (as determined under paragraph (2)), by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, those employees who elect conversion under subsection (a)(1).

(2) The Secretary of Agriculture shall appoint as Foreign Service personnel those employees who elect to accept conversion and who are not eligible for appointment under paragraph (1).

#### (d) Results of declining to convert

Any employee who declines conversion under subsection (b)(2) shall for so long as that employee continues to hold the designated position be deemed to be a member of the Foreign Service for purposes of allowances, differentials, and similar benefits (as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture).

(Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2105, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2150.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

In subsec. (a), "February 15, 1981" substituted for "the effective date of this Act" pursuant to section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
# Designation of the State of Kuwait as a Major Non-NATO Ally

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Consistent with the authority vested in me by section 517 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended (the “Act”), I hereby designate the State of Kuwait as a Major Non-NATO Ally of the United States for the purposes of the Act and the Arms Export Control Act. 

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 04-2151

Billing code 4710-10-P
ACCEPTED 01-15-00076-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/13/2015 9:46:34 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThruster Injector Faceplate Testing in Support of the Aerojet Rocket-Based Combined Cycle (RBCC) ConceptTo satisfy RBCC rocket thruster requirements of high performance and a minimum amount of free hydrogen at plume boundary, a new impinging injector element using gaseous hydrogen and gaseous oxygen as the propellants has been designed. Analysis has shown that this injector design has potential to provide a high specific impulse (Isp) while minimizing the amount of free hydrogen that is available to be burned with incoming secondary flow. Past studies and test programs have shown that gas/gas-impinging elements typically result in high injector face temperatures due to combustion occurring close to the face. Since this design is new, there is no hot fire experience with this element. Objectives of this test program were to gain experience and hot fire test data on this new rocket thruster element design and injector faceplate pattern. Twenty-two hot fire tests were run with maximum mixture ratio (MR) and chamber pressure (Pc) obtained at 7.25 and 1,822 psia, respectively. Post-test scanning microscope (SEM) images show only slight faceplate erosion during testing. This injector element design performed well and can be operated at design conditions: (1) Pc of 2,000 psia and MR of 7.0 and (2) Pc of 1,000 psia and MR of 5.0.Document ID19980201177Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsFazah, M. M.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Cramer, J. M.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1998Subject CategoryLaunch Vehicles And Space VehiclesReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208194NAS 1.15:208194M-871Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980201177.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1750a. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 105–83, title VII, §703, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1624, which set out definitions for this part, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Accessto publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site.(Historical purposes)

**Title:**Religious support andthe operations process 

PDF;EPUB

SuDoc:D 101.20/5:1-05.01
Item Number: 0324-A-08(online)
CGP system Number:001028510
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Richard E. Aniballi, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-187;

Second District —

August 7, 1973.

Brittain, Ketcham, Strass & Terlizzi, of Elgin, for appellant.

William J. Cowlin, State’s Attorney, of Woodstock, for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GUILD.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) announcement is made of the following open meeting:

*Name of Committee:*                             Scientific Advisory Board (SAB).                        

*Dates of Meeting:*                             October 28-29, 2004.                        

*Place:*                             The Cosmos Club, 2121 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC and the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, 14th St. & Alaska Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20306-6000.                        

*Time:*                             8:30 a.m.-4:45 p.m. (October 28, 2004). 8 a.m.-11:30 a.m. (October 29, 2004).                        

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Ridgely Rabold, Office of the Principal Deputy Director (PDD), AFIP, Building 54, Washington, DC 20306-6000, phone (202) 782-2553.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*General function of the board:*                     The SAB provides scientific and professional advice and guidance on programs, policies and procedures of the AFIP.                

*Agenda:*                     The Board will hear status reports from the AFIP Director, Principal Deputy Director, and each of the pathology sub-specialty departments, which the Board members will visit during the meeting.                          ( print page 57678)    

*Open board discussions:*                     Reports will be presented on all visited departments. The reports will consist of findings, recommended areas of further research, improvement, and suggested solutions. New trends and/or technologies will be discussed and goals established. The meeting is open to the public.                

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 04-21574  Filed 9-24-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M