alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                               Date: June 14, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510
                                               ---------

                                  ROYAL AHOLD
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
               ---------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)





     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                      ---                       ---

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes                       No    X
                                ---                       ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.
<PAGE>

     On June 14, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold" or the "Company")
issued a press release announcing Ahold's first quarter 2004 results. A copy of
this press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1.

<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                             KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.


                             /s/ H.R. Ryopponen
                             -------------------------------------------
Date: June 14, 2004          By:    H.R. Ryopponen
                             Title: Executive Vice President and CFO
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit   Description
-------   -----------

99.1      Royal Ahold press release dated June 14, 2004, announcing Ahold's
          first quarter 2004 results
Figure 2.11. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction between 63rd Street and Blue Parkway.

94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

39°01'20"

39°01'30"

39°01'40"

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

Hardesty

Brighton

Avenue

Avenue

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 56,670 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 770 feet

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
### SUBCHAPTER I—TREATIES
### §8516. Authority to implement United Nations Security Council resolutions imposing sanctions with respect to Iran

In addition to any other authority of the President with respect to implementing resolutions of the United Nations Security Council, the President may prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to implement a resolution that is agreed to by the United Nations Security Council and imposes sanctions with respect to Iran.

(Pub. L. 111–195, title I, §108, July 1, 2010, 124 Stat. 1337.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 8551(a) of this title.
128 STAT. 2116 PUBLIC LAW 113–228—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5681: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Nov. 19, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–228 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To provide for the approval of the Amendment to the Agreement Between the 

Government of the United States of America and the Government of the United 

Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for Cooperation on the Uses 

of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT 

BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED 

KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND FOR COOPERATION ON THE USES OF ATOMIC 

ENERGY FOR MUTUAL DEFENSE PURPOSES. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the provisions for congressional consideration of a proposed agreement for cooperation in 

subsection d. of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 

(42 U.S.C. 2153), the amendments to the Agreement Between the 

Government of the United States of America and the Government 

of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 

for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense 

Purposes, done at Washington, July 22, 2014, and transmitted 

to Congress on July 24, 2014, including all portions thereof (hereinafter in this section referred to as the ‘‘Amendment’’), may be 

brought into effect on or after the date of the enactment of this 

Act as if all the requirements in such section 123 for consideration 

of the Amendment had been satisfied, subject to subsection (b) 

of this section. 

(b) APPLICABILITY OF ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954 AND OTHER

PROVISIONS OF LAW.—Upon coming into effect, the Amendment 

shall be subject to the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 

1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and any other applicable United 

States law as if the Amendment had come into effect in accordance 

with the requirements of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act 

of 1954. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 5681] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DAVID JOEL UMPIERRE ,

Appellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2686 LT Case No. 2021

- 101542

- MMDL STAT E O F FLORIDA,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed August 9, 2022 Appeal from the C ounty Court for Vo lusia County, Christo pher Kelly , Judge. Matthe w J

. Metz , P ublic Defender, and Vict oria Ros e Cordero, Assistan t P ublic Defender , Daytona Beach , f or Appellant. Ashle y Moody , Atto rney General, Tallahass ee, and Ric hard A

. Pallas, Jr. , Assista nt Attorn ey General, Dayt ona Beach , f or Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LAMBERT , C.J. , EVANDE R a nd EISNAUGLE , JJ. , concur.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*P. L. Diming, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 57499;

First District (2nd Division) —

September 18, 1973.

Caplan and Golding, of Chicago, (Robert B. Rosen, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, William K. Hedrick and Thomas Passarelli, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

DOWNING, J., took no part.
#### .In the Matter of the Application of Sylvia Rand, Appellant, as Assignee of the Judgment Obtained in Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, for Leave to Issue Execution in an Action Entitled Isaac Ellman, Plaintiff, v. Pauline Diamond, Defendant-Respondent.—

Appeal from an order-denying a motion for leave to issue execution pursuant to sections 651 and 652 of the Civil Practice Act; and from a further order denying a motion denominated as one for “reargument”. Orders reversed on the law and the facts, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the issue of service raised by the affidavits referred to an official referee to hear and report, with his opinion, to Special Term, Part I, of the Supreme Court, Kings County. If, after such hearing, it be found that the judgment was properly obtained and is unpaid and unsatisfied, the motion for leave to issue execution should be granted. *(Matter of Molnar,*253 App. Div. 895.) The motion misnamed by appellant as one for “reargument” was, in fact, an application for leave to renew upon additional papers and as such, an appeal will lie from the order entered thereon. *(Beletsky*v. *Third Are. B. B. Go.,*44 App. Div. 632; *City of New York*v. *Montague,*149 App. Div. 601.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
### SUBCHAPTER X—KLAMATH TRIBE: DISPOSITION OF CERTAIN TRIBAL FUNDS
November 2022

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

1,687

1 732.75 1,694 7 4 0 0

2 732.78 1,695 1 1 0 0

3 732.82 1,697 2 1 0 0

4 732.87 1,699 2 1 0 0

5 733.01 1,705 6 3 0 0

6 733.26 1,716 11 6 0 0

7 733.44 1,724 8 4 0 0

8 734.17 1,757 33 17 0 0

9 734.39 1,767 10 5 0 0

10 734.53 1,773 6 3 0 0

11 734.65 1,778 5 3 0 0

12 734.75 1,783 5 3 0 0

13 734.84 1,787 4 2 0 0

14 734.92 1,790 3 2 0 0

15 735.00 1,794 4 2 0 0

16 735.06 1,797 3 2 0 0

17 735.13 1,800 3 2 0 0

18 735.19 1,803 3 2 0 0

19 735.25 1,806 3 2 0 0

20 735.33 1,809 3 2 0 0

21 735.41 1,813 4 2 0 0

22 735.50 1,817 4 2 0 0

23 735.58 1,821 4 2 0 0

24 735.65 1,824 3 2 0 0

25 735.70 1,826 2 1 0 0

26 735.79 1,830 4 2 0 0

27 735.87 1,834 4 2 0 0

28 735.94 1,837 3 2 0 0

29 735.99 1,840 3 2 0 0

30 736.07 1,843 3 2 0 0

TOTALS 156 86 0 0

ACRE-FEET 156 171 0 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 0

Spill 0

Total 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 12/2/2022
### [§209. Repealed. Pub. L. 97–424, title I, §126(d), Jan. 6, 1983, 96 Stat. 2115]

Section, Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 908; Pub. L. 88–423, §4(b), Aug. 13, 1964, 78 Stat. 397, provided for use of funds for construction and maintenance of public lands highways, cooperation with State agencies, the application of section 112 of this title to public lands highways, and for use of such funds for adjacent ancillary facilities and services.
#### In the Matter of Augustus Studer, as Trustee of New Jersey Midland Railway Company, Appellant, against Frank C. Moore, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Albany County Special Term, denying petitioner’s motion for an order in the nature of mandamus to compel the State Comptroller to accept or reject a claim filed under the Abandoned Property Law. Appellant is a substituted trustee of the New Jersey Midland Railway Company, appointed by the court of Chancery of the State of New Jersey in place of George S. Coe, who died in 1896. At the time of Coe’s death there was on deposit to his credit as trustee in a bank in New York City in two different accounts the sums of $2,079.92 and $3,856.37. In 1938, these sums were transferred, as abandoned funds, to the Comptroller of the State of New York, pursuant to section 127 of the Banking Law then in force. In June, 1944, appellant filed a claim for the funds with the Comptroller. Thjs claim was denied. Subsequently appellant commenced an action in the United States District Court to obtain possession of the funds. His action was dismissed. In August, 1946, appellant filed another claim with the Comptroller, who declined to consider it on the ground that it was substantially the same as the first claim and appellant’s time to apply for a redetermination of the first claim under the Abandoned Property Law (§ 1406) had long since expired. The court below held that the Comptroller did not fail to perform a duty enjoined upon him by law in refusing to consider the second claim. Order affirmed, without costs. Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Deyo, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents, with the following memorandum: The Chancery Court of New Jersey exercised its jurisdiction by appointing a substitute trustee on April 4, 1944. That trustee is entitled to the possession of this fund. The Comptroller of the State of New York is without authority to seize funds in the custody, of the court in a sister State.
### §1221. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–364, §1, July 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 688, which related to membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §1131. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–660, §1, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 910, which related to membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Parametric Study of Accelerations of an Airplane Due to a Wake Vortex SystemA study was conducted using strip theory to systematically investigate the effects of progressively more complete descriptions of the interaction of an airplane with a wake vortex system. The emphasis was in roll-dominant, parallel, vortex encounters. That is, the simulated airplane's longitudinal axis was nearly parallel to the rotation axis of the vortex system for most of the results presented. The study began with a drag-less rectangular wing in the flow field of a single vortex and progressed to a complete airplane with aerodynamic surfaces possessing taper, sweep, dihedral, and stalling and immersed in the flow field of a vortex pair in ground effect. The effects of the pitch, roll, and yaw attitudes of the airplane on the calculated accelerations were also investigated. The airplane had the nominal characteristics of a Boeing 757, and the vortex flow field had the nominal characteristics of the wake of a Boeing 767. The Bumham-Hallock model of a vortex flow field was used throughout the study. The data are presented mainly in terms of contours of equal acceleration in a two-dimensional area centered on the vortex pair and having dimensions of 300 feet by 300 feet.Document ID19990047139Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsStewart, Eric C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1999Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1999-208745NAS 1.15:208745L-17831Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-04-11-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990047139.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, Respondent, v. Gotham Silk Hosiery Company, Inc., Appellant.

No opinion. Present ■— Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [179 Misc. 557.]
### SUBCHAPTER LXXVII—PASCUA YAQUI TRIBE
L. Preston Bryant, Jr. Secretary ofNatural Resources 

# COMMONWEALTHa/VIRGINIA DEPARTMENTOFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219

Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 TDD (804) 698-4021 www.deq.virginia.gov

Ms. Judith M. Katz, Director Air Protection Division (3APOO) 

## MAR 06 '::[YJ9 I t . .. , , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 David K. Paylor Director (804) 698-4000 1-800-592-5482

Reference: SIP Revision for MeadWestvaco Packaging Resource Group Dear Ms. Katz: Pursuant to the requirements of § 110 ofthe Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting approval ofa revision to the Commonwealth ofVirginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) approved onFebruary 23,2009 under the authority of

### § 10.1-1185 ofthe Code ofVirginia and submitted in accordance with the requirements of40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal ofImplementation Plans). The planrevision is effective upon the date ofthis letter. The revision consists ofthe control ofvisibility-impairing emissions from MeadWestvaco Packaging Resource Group located in Alleghany County, Virginia through the application of Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART). Enclosed are the following: 1. SIP Revision, including the following: A. Federally enforceable state operating permit. B. Statement ofbasis, including federal land manager comment.2. 

### Public participation certification. 3. Summary oftestimony and responses thereto. Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please let us know.

DKP\kgs TEMPLATES\SOURCE-SPECIFIC\PLNOO SRCESPEC\MEADWESTVACO\MW-SIP.DOC Enclosures
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 790.53

 790.17

 790.66

 791.03

 791.09

 791.08

 791.22

 791.26

 791.31

 791.35

 791.46

 791.52

 791.57

 791.42

 791.52

 791.63

 791.76

 791.88

 792.01

 792.16

 792.30

 792.46

 792.60

 792.73

 792.85

 792.96

 793.06

 793.18

 793.27

 793.41

 7.70

 7.55

 7.75

 7.91

 7.93

 7.93

 7.99

 8.00

 8.02

 8.04

 8.09

 8.11

 8.14

 8.07

 8.11

 8.16

 8.22

 8.27

 8.33

 8.39

 8.45

 8.53

 8.59

 8.65

 8.70

 8.75

 8.80

 8.85

 8.89

 8.96

STORAGE

-0.21

-0.15

+0.20

+0.16

+0.03

+0.00

+0.06

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.05

+0.03

+0.02

-0.06

+0.04

+0.05

+0.06

+0.05

+0.06

+0.07

+0.06

+0.07

+0.06

+0.06

+0.05

+0.05

+0.05

+0.06

+0.04

+0.07

CHANGE

93

54

144

94

28

14

43

24

26

25

39

28

26

-18

37

39

44

41

46

49

47

52

47

44

41

39

37

44

37

49

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 196

 127

 40

 14

 14

 14

 11

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 14

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 13

 13

 13

 13

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .13

 .12

 .12

 .11

 .10

 .13

 .12

 .08

 .09

 .12

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .12

 .05

 .08

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .06

 .08

 .06

 .06

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

NOVEMBER 2020 RUN DATE: 01/29/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.09 1,313 745 0 34 2.12 .37

ACRE-FEET +1,090 2,604 1,478 0 67

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,478

 1,478

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .37

JULY 1, 2020 .46

 7.91

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = .37
November 2023

STORAGE 

1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED*

RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

35.08

1 827.93 34.97 -0.11 10 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

2 827.83 34.86 -0.11 10 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

3 827.73 34.76 -0.11 10 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

4 827.65 34.67 -0.08 20 0 60 2 0.07 0.00

5 827.56 34.58 -0.10 15 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

6 827.47 34.48 -0.10 15 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

7 827.38 34.39 -0.09 18 0 60 5 0.16 0.06

8 827.28 34.29 -0.11 11 0 60 4 0.12 0.00

9 827.21 34.21 -0.07 25 0 60 2 0.06 0.00

10 827.12 34.12 -0.09 15 0 60 2 0.06 0.00

11 827.04 34.03 -0.08 21 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

12 826.95 33.94 -0.09 15 0 60 2 0.07 0.00

13 826.87 33.86 -0.08 19 0 60 1 0.04 0.00

14 826.79 33.77 -0.08 19 0 60 1 0.04 0.00

15 826.74 33.72 -0.05 34 0 60 0 0.01 0.23

16 826.69 33.67 -0.05 35 0 60 1 0.02 0.07

17 826.62 33.60 -0.07 25 0 60 1 0.04 0.03

18 826.60 33.58 -0.02 50 0 60 1 0.02 0.46

19 826.70 33.68 0.10 116 0 60 4 0.11 0.32

20 826.77 33.75 0.07 98 0 60 2 0.06 0.00

21 826.77 33.75 0.00 63 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

22 826.71 33.69 -0.06 30 0 60 1 0.03 0.00

23 826.66 33.64 -0.05 35 0 60 1 0.04 0.00

24 826.57 33.55 -0.09 17 0 60 4 0.12 0.00

25 826.50 33.47 -0.07 26 0 60 3 0.08 0.00

26 826.45 33.42 -0.05 36 0 60 2 0.05 0.00

27 826.40 33.37 -0.05 35 0 60 1 0.03 0.00

28 826.34 33.31 -0.06 30 0 60 1 0.02 0.00

29 826.25 33.21 -0.09 14 0 60 1 0.03 0.03

30 826.20 33.16 -0.05 34 0 60 0 0.01 0.00

TOTALS -1.89 901 0 1,800 63 1.85 1.20

ACRE-FEET -1,890 1,787 0 3,570 125

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 0

Spill 3,570

Total 3,570

Precipitation

This month = 1.20

October 01, 2023 

To date =

1.76

Historical Archive and Report Database

Stony Gorge Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 12/10/2023
### §2695b. Omitted

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(a) [title IV], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009, 3009–46, which provided that in fiscal year 1998 a system was to be in place that allocated to each department and agency full cost of its presence outside of the United States, was from the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts. Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriation act:

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101[(a)] [title IV], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321, 1321–36; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-3015

KEVIN F. CORADESCHI,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

Respondent.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in NY0752040163-A-1.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Department of Homeland Security's motion for a 21-

day extension of time, until May 28, 2009, to file its response to Kevin F. Coradeschi's

attorney fee request,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

MAY - 7 2009

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Date	

Jan Horbaly

cc:	Thomas G. Roth, Esq.

	

Clerk 

tiotstsitliterin

s8

	Hilary A. Stern, Esq.	

MAY 7 2009

JAN NORNALY

CLERK