alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Manuel TAVERA-TERAN, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40731.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*668Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Juan Manuel Tavera-Teran (Tavera) is appealing his guilty-plea conviction of being found in the United States after previous deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional.

Tavera’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Tavera contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*■ — ■ U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Tavera properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### LawrenceWilder, Sr., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

# FILED DEC 302009 Clerk, U.S. Districtand Bankruptcy Courts



### v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### CivilAction No. 

# O!} 2446 HendersenWebb, Inc., et al., Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before the Court is the plaintiffspro se complaint and applicationto proceed informa pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be dismissed. The plaintiff, a self-described "psychiatrically disabled 44-year-old African American male," Compl. at 1-2 (punctuation and spelling altered), purports to bring claims under several federal statutes and the common law, and demands $200,789,113.00 in damages. The sevenpage complaint is rambling and incoherent. Itmakes mention ofnumerous public personalities, including John Gotti, Congressman Elijah Cummings, see id. at 3, "Baltimore City Mayor Sheila Dixon," id. at 4, and several Maryland state and federaljudges, id. at 5. In addition to alleging that the plaintiffwas falsely accused "forthe purpose ofviolating my due process, disrespecting my Janet Reno DOJ pardon, suppressing evidence to prove my innocence, and stopping my intervention ofthe NewHaven Firefighters Supreme Court case," the complaint alleges that "U.S. Court ofAppeals for the 4th Circuitjudge Williams stalked the plaintiffin Bedford, Pennsylvania at the Pennsylvania Turnpike tollbooth." Id. at 6. A complaint such as this one that describes fantastic ordelusional scenarios is subject to immediate dismissal. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989); Bestv. Kelly, 39 F.3d

### 328, 330-31 (D.C. Cir. 1994). Moreover, a complaint may be dismissed as frivolous when it 

### lacks "an arguable basis in law and fact." Brandon v. District a/ColumbiaBd. a/Parole, 734 F.2d 56,59 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Accordingly, this compl'**wr~~ismissed.** ) 

### A separate appropriate order accompanies hi morandum opinion.

# //I~ Date: 

# /1-/:t/

# ! 0 

# '1**~'** Unitdd States DistrictJudge
### §290h. Congressional findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) social and economic development ultimately depends on the active participation of individuals within a society and on the enhancement of opportunities for those individuals;

(2) the development of individuals and institutions in African countries can benefit by the provision of support for community-based self-help activities;

(3) by enacting title IX of chapter 2 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2218], and recent amendments to that Act, the Congress has sought to enable the poor to participate in the process of development;

(4) the Inter-American Foundation, established by Congress in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1969 [22 U.S.C. 290f], to support the efforts of the people of Latin America and the Caribbean to solve their development problems, has demonstrated a successful approach to development; and

(5) an African Development Foundation similar in structure to the Inter-American Foundation, but adapted to the specific needs of Africa, can complement current United States development programs in Africa.

(Pub. L. 96–533, title V, §502, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3151; Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(2) [title V, §586(h)(1)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–119.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in par. (3), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Title IX of chapter 2 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is classified generally to subpart IX of part II of subchapter I (§2218) of chapter 32 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1969, referred to in par. (4), is Pub. L. 91–175, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 805. The Inter-American Foundation was established by section 401 of that Act, which is classified to section 290f of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Amendment by Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(2) [title V, §586(h)(1)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–119, directing the repeal of pars. (4) and (5) of this section did not become effective pursuant to section 1000(a)(2) [title V, §586] of div. B of Pub. L. 106–113, formerly set out as an Abolition of the Inter-American Foundation note under section 290f of this title.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

African Development Foundation changed to United States African Development Foundation by Pub. L. 113–76, div. K, title III, Jan. 17, 2014, 128 Stat. 482. See section 290h–1 of this title.

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 96–533, title V, §501, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3151, provided: "This title [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'African Development Foundation Act'."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 145

 144

 143

 141

 139

 137

 134

 132

 135

 133

 132

 132

 129

 131

 131

 128

 129

 128

 127

 127

 125

 124

 123

 123

 123

 123

 125

 128

 125

 127

 128

 135

 133

 132

 132

 130

 127

 126

 125

 124

 124

 124

 120

 121

 120

 118

 117

 116

 117

 116

 116

 118

 120

 115

 115

 115

 115

 116

 118

 119

 119

 121

 139

 137

 135

 135

 134

 130

 129

 127

 128

 128

 127

 126

 125

 124

 123

 121

 120

 121

 121

 122

 122

 122

 120

 120

 118

 119

 119

 121

 121

 122

 123

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 7, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
    Signatures
    
    Title/s/ Donald R. Kimble

Donald R. Kimble
    
    President and Director 
(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Thomas P. Reed

Thomas P. Reed
    
    Vice President and Director 
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)/s/ Richard A. Cheap

Richard A. Cheap
    
    Director/s/ Reginald D. Dickson

Reginald D. Dickson
    
    Director/s/ Edward J. Kane

Edward J. Kane
    
    Director/s/ Roger E. Kephart

Roger E. Kephart
    
    Director/s/ James D. Robbins

James D. Robbins
    
    Director/s/ Karen D. Roggenkamp

Karen D. Roggenkamp
    
    Director
|                                                                 |   | Year Ended December 31, |    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|---------|
| (dollar amounts in thousands)                         |   | 2010                                   |    |   | 2009 |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007 |   |   | 2006 |   |
|                                                                 |   |                                   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings:                                                            |   |                                   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income (loss) before taxes                                           |   | $                                      | 190,355 |   |   | $ | (11,988 | ) |   | $ | 260,779 |   |   | $ | 317,876 |   |   | $ | 345,550 |   |
| Earnings available for fixed charges, excluding interest on deposits |   |                                   | 190,355 |   |   |   | (11,988 | ) |   |   | 260,779 |   |   |   | 317,876 |   |   |   | 345,550 |   |
|                                                                 |   |                                   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings available for fixed charges, including interest on deposits |   | $                                      | 190,355 |   |   | $ | (11,988 | ) |   | $ | 260,779 |   |   | $ | 317,876 |   |   | $ | 345,550 |   |
|                                                                 |   |                                   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends:                |   |                                   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Preferred stock dividends                                            |   |                                   | 12,273  |   |   |   | 16,195 |   |   |   | 36,521 |   |   |   | 49,643 |   |   |   | 47,944 |   |
| Combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends                 |   | $                                      | 12,273  |   |   | $ | 16,195 |   |   | $ | 36,521 |   |   | $ | 49,643 |   |   | $ | 47,944 |   |
|                                                                 |   |                                   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends     |   |                                   | 15.51   | x  |   |   | (0.74 | )x |   |   | 7.14 | x  |   |   | 6.40 | x  |   |   | 7.21 | x  |

----
#### Slaven v. Commonwealth.

June 15, 1943.

Will H. Caylor for appellant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, and W. Owen Keller, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Rees

Affirming.

This is an appeal from a judgment sentencing Dink Slaven to imprisonment for a term of three years for maliciously shooting at Obie Winchester without wounding him. The principal ground urged for reversal of the judgment is alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

The parties live in a remote section of McCreary county. On the day the difficulty occurred, in Septem*697her, 1941, appellant, accompanied by his wife and other members of his family, walked from his home across a mountain, a distance of 6 miles, to the home of Loss Hall, a relative. Appellant carried a 22-caliber rifle. Just before the Slavens reached the Hall home they met Obie Winchester, his 12-year-old son, Bill Winchester, and Mr. and Mrs. George Troxell. The two Winchesters and Mrs. Troxell testified for the Commonwealth and stated that appellant cursed Obie Winchester as soon as they met, threatened to kill him, and raised the rifle to his shoulder. Bill Winchester, who was carrying a one-year old child of the Troxell’s, jumped in front of his father and asked appellant not to shoot. Appellant fired the rifle twice according to some of the witnesses for the Commonwealth and three times according to others, aiming at Obie Winchester who ran after the first shot. Mrs. Troxell grabbed her child from Bill Winchester and ran behind a building nearby. After appellant had fired two or three shots Bill Winchester drew his pistol and shot several times in the direction of appellant. No one was wounded. Appellant testified that Obie Winchester had whipped appellant’s boy about two years before the difficulty, in September, 1941; that he disliked Winchester, and cursed him when they met in the road. He admitted that he fired one shot, but claimed that he shot at the pistol in Bill Winchester’s hand after the latter had fired several shots. George Troxell, introduced as a witness by the appellant, testified that he and his wife and the Winchesters were walking along the road when they met Dink Slaven. He said that Slaven fired the first shot, and when asked to repeat the first words spoken after the meeting answered:

> “Dink Slaven said: ‘If you are not ready to die, get ready to die. ’ He throwed his 22-caliber up and went to shooting.”

Appellant’s contention that the evidence was not sufficient to take the case to the jury and to sustain its verdict obviously is without merit.

Some complaint is made of instruction 1-A which qualified the instruction on self-defense, but the evidence fully warranted the qualification. Harris v. Commonwealth, 140 Ky. 41, 130 S. W. 801; Toncray v. Commonwealth, 291 Ky. 471, 165 S. W. (2d) 8; Roberson’s Criminal Law and Procedure, sec. 327.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### John S. Pedersin, Respondent, v. The Leonhard Michel Brewing Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed and ■ new trial granted, *866costs to abide the event, unless within twenty days plaintiff stipulate to reduce the amount of the verdict to $9,000, in which case the judgment as so reduced, and the order, are unanimously affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge, the annual report on Form 20-F of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and that the information contained in the such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation.

Date: May 12, 2008



/s/ WALLACE C. KOUWallace C. Kou,Chief Executive Officer/s/ RIYADH LAIRiyadh Lai,Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY HIGH

 192

 220

 192

 183

 207

 231

 172

 213

 178

 187

 217

 191

 219

 165

 201

 191

 191

 199

 164

 232

 176

 164

 220

 191

 188

 156

 166

 170

 193

 156

 167

 156

 150

 154

 152

 139

 144

 148

 150

 143

 150

 156

 126

 124

 115

 104

 118

 117

 128

 132

 128

 140

 151

 133

 125

 134

 140

 125

 172

 180

 174

 165

 171

 169

 156

 160

 159

 159

 161

 172

 178

 142

 147

 146

 135

 158

 135

 165

 154

 146

 166

 169

 165

 139

 150

 155

 145

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 23, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T07:49:19-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Raul Collazo, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 59015;

First District (1st Division)

June 17, 1974.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago (William D. Trade and Richard D. Kharas, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel), for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago (Patrick T. Driscoll, Jr., and Ellis B. Levin, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel), for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE GOLDBERG.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Larry White, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58315;

First District (2nd Division) —

July 5, 1973.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Ira Chur gin and Lee T. Hettinger, Assistant Public Defenders, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Mariann Twist, and Nicholas P. Iavarone, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

STAMOS, P. J., took no part.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Francesco STRATI.

No. 11528.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 7, 1955.

Decided June 17, 1955.

Robert W. Lees, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa. (W. Wilson White, U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

Filindo B. Masino, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We find no error. The order of the court below will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Grim, D.C.1954, 131 F.Supp. 786. Its correctness is attested to by United States v. Menasche, 348 U.S. 528, 75 S.Ct. 513, and Shomberg v. United States, 348 U.S. 540, 75 S.Ct. 509, subsequent to the lower court’s disposition.
AFS-11-046-E 

Dec 10 2010 

 Exemption No. 6612G 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-8525 

Mr. Juan de Mesa 

United Airlines Flight Training Center 

United Air Lines, Inc. 

7401 Martin Luther King Boulevard 

Denver, CO 80207 

Dear Mr. de Mesa: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 6612, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated November 10, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of United Air Lines, Inc. (United), for an extension of Exemption No. 6612, 

as amended. That exemption from § 121.135(a)(3) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

allows United to use electronic digital technology to document the revision level in lieu of 

printing the last revision date on each page of each manual required under § 121.133. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to United. 

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6612, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 
 2

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and 

limitations listed below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The page numbers may be omitted from any data output; however, the organizational 

format of the technical data must be retained.

2. The data output must employ appropriate references to the organizational format used

(e.g., chapters, sections, paragraphs).

3. The data output system must include a means to allow a user to determine the revision 

status of the data output.

4. All printed data output must contain at least the following information:

a. The date the data output was printed;

b. The revision date of the data output; and

c. The title of the manual and the aircraft, component, or item to which the 

manual applies (e.g., Boeing 767, GE CF6-6, Sunstrand Constant Speed 

Drive).

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 6612, as amended, to 

April 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
January 2022

STORAGE ACRE-FEET SAN LUIS RELEASE - C.F.S. GAIN(+) OR EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY

ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING 

C.F.S

POWER PACHECO

TUNNEL

SPILL LOSS(-) C.F.S. C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

616,345

1 412.23 623,461 7,116 3,679 0 66 0 -26 8 0.03 0.00

2 413.04 630,353 6,892 3,605 0 73 0 -58 36 0.13 0.00

3 414.07 639,157 8,804 4,700 0 76 0 -185 0 0.00 0.00

4 414.75 644,994 5,837 3,183 0 70 0 -170 22 0.08 0.00

5 416.02 655,949 10,955 5,737 0 71 0 -144 17 0.06 0.00

6 417.15 665,755 9,806 5,120 0 70 0 -106 17 0.06 0.00

7 418.01 673,254 7,499 4,050 0 68 0 -201 14 0.05 0.00

8 419.24 684,034 10,780 5,663 0 68 0 -161 31 0.11 0.01

9 420.54 695,497 11,463 6,050 0 67 0 -203 9 0.03 0.00

10 421.56 704,541 9,044 4,840 0 75 0 -205 3 0.01 0.01

11 422.56 713,450 8,909 4,840 0 63 0 -285 3 0.01 0.00

12 423.50 721,863 8,413 4,143 0 67 0 165 15 0.05 0.00

13 424.49 730,763 8,900 4,608 0 64 0 -57 15 0.05 0.00

14 425.70 741,695 10,932 5,604 0 76 0 -17 9 0.03 0.00

15 426.88 752,390 10,695 5,559 0 72 0 -96 9 0.03 0.00

16 428.05 763,051 10,661 5,638 0 76 0 -187 0 0.00 0.00

17 429.24 773,947 10,896 5,607 0 79 0 -34 15 0.05 0.00

18 430.36 784,251 10,304 5,429 0 76 0 -158 18 0.06 0.00

19 431.31 793,027 8,776 4,570 0 85 0 -60 21 0.07 0.00

20 432.28 802,022 8,995 4,570 0 78 0 42 12 0.04 0.00

21 433.22 810,772 8,750 4,570 0 67 0 -92 12 0.04 0.00

22 433.97 817,776 7,004 3,847 0 75 0 -240 72 0.24 0.00

23 435.06 827,992 10,216 5,366 0 73 0 -142 0 0.00 0.00

24 435.98 836,649 8,657 4,555 0 77 0 -113 15 0.05 0.00

25 436.88 845,147 8,498 4,490 0 75 0 -131 18 0.06 0.00

26 437.81 853,958 8,811 4,490 0 81 0 33 28 0.09 0.00

27 438.81 863,468 9,510 5,127 0 81 0 -252 12 0.04 0.00

28 439.87 873,587 10,119 5,367 0 82 0 -184 12 0.04 0.00

29 440.79 882,401 8,814 4,765 0 87 0 -234 12 0.04 0.00

30 441.88 892,884 10,483 5,553 0 88 0 -180 16 0.05 0.00

31 442.86 902,344 9,460 4,958 0 50 0 -139 44 0.14 0.00

TOTALS 285,999 150,283 0 2,276 0 -3,820 515 1.74 0.02

ACRE-FEET 285,999 298,089 0 4,506 0 -7,584 1,022

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 0 Spill 0

Pacheco Tunnel 4,506

Total 4,506

Precipitation

This month = 0.02

October 01, 2021 To date = 4.35

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/3/2024