alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George Ungar and Max Zwiebel, Trading as Ungar & Zwiebel, Defendants in Error, v. Ignatz Feuer, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 17,202.

*Judgment*— default *as admission of amount of damages.*Under Practice Act, § 57, a defendant who, on entering his appearance, filed a written demand for a trial by jury and paid the fees, became entitled to have his damages assessed by a jury, even though he was in default. A default does not admit the amount of damages.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. •Gemmill, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed October 1, 1912.

Charles Wolff, for plaintiff in error.

Elbert C. Ferguson, for defendants in error.

*205Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error was sued for the price of goods sold and delivered. His amended affidavit of merits or defense having been stricken from the files, default was taken for want of an affidavit of merits, and the court, without a jury, assessed the damages upon the plaintiff’s affidavit of clainr..

At the time of entering his appearance plaintiff in error filed a demand in writing for a trial by jury, and paid the necessary fees therefor. The default did not-admit the amount of damages. Wanack v. People, 187 Ill. 116; C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Holbrook, 72 Ill. 419; Cook v. Skelton, 20 Ill. 107. Under Section 57 of the Practice Act he was entitled, after such demand and payment of fees, to have the damages assessed by a jury. Pinkel v. Domestic Sewing Machine Co., 89 Ill. 277; Electric Co. v. Manf. Co., 111 Ill. 309; Loellke v. Grant, 120 Ill. App. 74.

Whether or not we may take judicial notice that such section is made a part of the rules of the Municipal Court, we may so regard it inasmuch as it is assumed and treated as such by both parties in their briefs. Therefore, for failure to comply with the imperative requirements of the statute as aforesaid, the judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
### §47. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title III, §347(3), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1422

Section, acts Jan. 16, 1891, ch. 74, 26 Stat. 718; May 29, 1920, ch. 214, 41 Stat. 655, related to custodian of funds and transfer of funds for outdoor relief.
### §290l–1. Governor and alternate Governor

#### (a) Appointment

The President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint a Governor of the Bank, an alternate for the Governor, and a Director of the Bank.

#### (b) Compensation

Any person who serves as a Governor of the Bank or as an alternate for the Governor may not receive any salary or other compensation from the United States by reason of such service.

(Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(c)(3), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2034.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subsecs. (a) and (b) were in the original (A) and (B), respectively, and were editorially redesignated for purposes of codification.

Another section 562(c)(3) of Pub. L. 101–513 is set out as a note under section 2293 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 511.09

 510.38

 509.70

 509.01

 508.34

 507.64

 506.75

 505.76

 504.64

 503.33

 502.00

 500.66

 499.62

 498.60

 497.59

 496.90

 496.17

 495.47

 494.79

 494.09

 493.37

 492.53

 491.81

 490.59

 489.02

 487.38

 486.11

 485.10

 484.10

 483.06

 482.06

 1,636,724

 1,628,355

 1,620,352

 1,612,246

 1,604,388

 1,596,193

 1,585,793

 1,574,253

 1,561,231

 1,546,048

 1,530,685

 1,515,259

 1,503,324

 1,491,649

 1,480,119

 1,472,260

 1,463,960

 1,456,017

 1,448,314

 1,440,399

 1,432,274

 1,422,814

 1,414,722

 1,401,047

 1,383,514

 1,365,279

 1,351,214

 1,340,064

 1,329,054

 1,317,636

 1,306,689

STORAGE

-10,040

-8,369

-8,003

-8,106

-7,858

-8,195

-10,400

-11,540

-13,022

-15,183

-15,363

-15,426

-11,935

-11,675

-11,530

-7,859

-8,300

-7,943

-7,703

-7,915

-8,125

-9,460

-8,092

-13,675

-17,533

-18,235

-14,065

-11,150

-11,010

-11,418

-10,947

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 4,702

 3,910

 3,910

 3,910

 3,932

 3,940

 5,099

 5,783

 6,420

 7,705

 7,677

 7,655

 5,760

 5,725

 5,682

 3,769

 3,770

 3,770

 3,763

 3,753

 3,747

 3,740

 3,740

 6,530

 8,786

 9,169

 7,025

 5,501

 5,482

 5,459

 5,450

POWER

 215

 214

 210

 211

 227

 212

 265

 265

 288

 249

 278

 280

 253

 274

 267

 283

 266

 295

 287

 257

 297

 132

 303

 302

 288

 270

 235

 262

 258

 255

 407

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-145

-96

+85

+34

+198

+20

+120

+230

+143

+299

+210

+158

-5

+112

+137

+90

-149

+61

+166

+20

-52

-897

-37

-62

+235

+246

+169

+141

+189

-43

+338

OR

 191

 171

 168

 125

 144

 178

 178

 196

 180

 217

 194

 167

 186

 152

 166

 166

 176

 201

 165

 193

 200

 197

 200

 199

 187

 115

 111

 125

 214

 178

 188

C.F.S.

 .50

 .45

 .44

 .33

 .38

 .47

 .47

 .52

 .48

 .58

 .52

 .45

 .50

 .41

 .45

 .45

 .48

 .55

 .45

 .53

 .55

 .54

 .55

 .55

 .52

 .32

 .31

 .35

 .60

 .50

 .53

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR July 20, 2012

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2012 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -340,075 0 165,264 8,105 0 +1,915 5,428 14.73 .00

ACRE-FEET -340,075 0 327,801 16,076 0 +3,798 10,766

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 327,801

PACHECO TUNNEL 16,076 TOTAL 343,877

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2011 TO DATE = 6.82

 1,646,764

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
### SUBCHAPTER II—CONGRESSIONAL-EXECUTIVE COMMISSION ON THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
§ 664.810 How does a Local Board or other entity become eligible to receive a Youth Opportunity Grant? ( a ) A Local Board is eligible to receive a Youth Opportunity Grant if it serves a community that: ( 1 ) Has been designated as an empowerment zone (EZ) or enterprise community (EC) under section 1391 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986;
( 2 ) Is located in a State that does not have an EZ or an EC and that has been designated by its Governor as a high poverty area; or
( 3 ) Is one of two areas in a State that has been designated by the Governor as an area for which a local board may apply for a Youth Opportunity Grant, and that meets the poverty rate criteria in section 1392 (a)(4), (b), and (d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( b ) An entity other than a Local Board is eligible to receive a grant if that entity: ( 1 ) Is a WIA Indian and Native American grant recipient under WIA section 166; and
( 2 ) Serves a community that: ( i ) Meets the poverty rate criteria in section 1392(a)(4), (b), and (d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and
( ii ) Is located on an Indian reservation or serves Oklahoma Indians or Alaska Native villages or Native groups, as provided in WIA section 169 (d)(2)(B). (WIA sec. 169(c) and (d).)
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, James K. B. Hesketh, the Chief Executive Officer of Canyon Resources Corporation (the“Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, (the “Form10-Q”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date: November 13, 2006 /s/ James K. B. Hesketh James K. B. Hesketh
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V EN T H C IR C U IT NOVEMB ER 15, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ N o. 07- 1275 2 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ D. C. Docket N o. 06-00339 -CV -H -S GREGORY HAYES,
Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t,
ve rs us THE HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, d.b .a. Ben efi t M an ag em en t Se rv ic es , Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ Appeal f rom the United State s District Court f o r th e N o rth e rn D i s tr i c to f

A l ab a ma

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ (N ove m be r 15, 200 7) Be fo re CA RN E S, BA RKE T T and W IL SO N , Ci rc uit Jud ge s. PE R CU RIA M:2

G re gor y H ay es ( “ H ay es ”) , appe al s f ro m the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s gr an t of
sum m ar y j udgm en t i n f

av or of T he H ar tf or d L if e In sur an ce Co m

pany (“ Hartford”). W e re view the district court’ s rulings on m otion for sum m ary j udgm en t de nov o , apply ing th e sam e legal standards that governed the dis trict
co ur t. W illiams v. B ellSout h Telecom ms. Inc. , 373 F. 3d 11 32, 1134 (11t h Cir. 2004 ). This is an E RISAcase. H artford, the insurer and plan adm inistrator, denied Hay es long-term

disabilit y

benefits because H artford c onclud ed that Hay es wa s capable of w orking in a “ light to sedentary range” occ upation
. The district court fo und, and the part ie s a gr ee , that the f ram ew ork f

or r ev ie w ing H ar

tf or d’ s de ci sio n is th e h ei gh te ne d a rb it rary andcap ric io us st an da rd
. W il li ams , 373 F
. 3d at 11 37- 38. T he f ir st p ro ng o f thi s st an dard is to c ondu ct

de nov o r ev ie w“ to d et er m ine whether the claim

adm inistrator’ s benefits-denial decision is ‘ wr ong’ ( i.e., the court disagrees with the adm inistrator’ s decision); if it is no t, then end the inquiry and affir m the decision.” Id

. at 1138 (footno te om itted). H er e, w e do n ot p ro ce ed

pa st the f ir st p ro ng. H ay es , w ho w as a
com m ercia lly -licensed truck driver f or ten y ears, concedes that he has the phy sical ability to perform

sedentary

to ligh t occupations , but only contends th at he does not have the int ellectual ability for anyoc cu

pa tio n w ith in the se de ntary to lig ht3

oc cu pa tio n r an ge . H ar

tf or d pr oduc ed

e vid en ce that H ay es ha d th e ed uc at ion , tr ai nin g, or

e xpe ri en ce to pe rf

orm vari ous oc cu

pa tio ns w ith in the se de ntary to lig ht o cc upatio na l r an ge , suc h a s aloa din g in spe ct or , tr uc k sa fe ty

ins pe ct or , or pe ris habl e-fr ei gh t i ns pe ct or . Upo n ath or ou gh co ns id erat io n o f th e rec or d, we agree with the district court; the evidence indicates that Hay es has the intellectual capacity to perform

work in the sedentary

to ligh t occupational range. A c c o r d i n g l y, w e a f

f i rm. AFFIRMED.
§ 2.249 Petitions for amendment: Appeals. ( a ) *Right of appeal.* Except for appeals pertaining to Office of Personnel Management records, where a petition for amendment has been rejected in whole or in part, the individual submitting the petition may appeal the denial to the Assistant Secretary—Policy, Budget and Administration.
( b ) *Time for appeal.* ( 1 ) An appeal must be received no later than twenty (20) working days after the date of the decision on a petition.
( 2 ) The Assistant Secretary—Policy, Budget and Administration may, for good cause shown, extend the time for submission of an appeal if a written request for additional time is received within twenty (20) working days of the date of the decision on a petition.
( c ) *Form of appeal.* ( 1 ) An appeal shall be in writing and shall attach copies of the initial petition and the decision on that petition.
( 2 ) The appeal shall contain a brief statement of the reasons why the appellant believes the decision on the petition to have been in error.
( 3 ) The appeal shall be addressed to Privacy Act Officer, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Policy, Budget and Administration, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC 20240.
[40 FR 44505, Sept. 26, 1975, as amended at 47 FR 38328, Aug. 31, 1982; 53 FR 3750, Feb. 9, 1988]
Table 26

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary Data Subject to Change San Luis and Cross Valley Canals

2016

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

SAN LUIS CANAL

City of Avenal 129 114 130 151 169 192 221 224 175 177 153 144 1,979

City of Coalinga 237 222 316 283 321 456 414 485 388 357 329 172 3,980

City of Dos Palos 80 71 74 74 138 182 75 178 107 109 59 81 1,228

City of Huron 46 42 50 58 69 81 86 84 77 68 54 51 766

Pacheco WD 0 0 0 0 0 0 219 39 40 301 165 0 764

Pacheco CCID Non-project (Hamburg) 0 136 161 456 724 702 0 0 0 0 45 0 2,224

Panoche WD 23 662 859 1,445 2,613 4,289 3,548 2,800 1,814 1,308 387 61 19,809

San Luis WD 149 1,973 3,375 5,109 7,627 10,751 10,860 6,099 4,849 4,446 1,971 9 57,218

Westlands WD 2,262 3,868 8,320 19,356 31,794 53,478 51,258 29,110 21,265 14,981 4,155 3,050 242,897

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 4) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 6) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kern National Wildlife Refuge (USFWS) 2,493 1,850 0 385 490 0 0 1,570 4,232 3,813 4,820 2,440 22,093

0

Total 5,419 8,938 13,285 27,317 43,945 70,131 66,681 40,590 32,947 25,560 12,138 6,008 352,959

O'NEILL FOREBAY DELIVERIES

O'Neill Forebay Wildlife 0 15 0 31 2 69 90 113 95 63 53 87 618

San Luis WD Ag 6 17 57 168 344 979 543 198 555 316 190 18 3,391

San Luis M&I 6 39 18 21 31 51 52 51 42 33 21 19 384

VA Cemetery 2 16 10 35 49 63 78 64 48 22 5 2 394

Total 14 87 85 255 426 1,162 763 426 740 434 269 126 4,787

CROSS VALLEY CANAL (See Notes 1 & 2 below)

County of Fresno (See Note 2 below) 90 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 270

County of Tulare 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lower Tule River ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Pixley ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Kern-Tulare WD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,665 0 0 2,665

Hills-Valley ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Tri-Valley ID 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 90 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,815 0 0 2,935

SAN FELIPE DIVISION

Santa Clara (including Casa De Fruta) 2,637 2,153 1,399 2,191 10,239 18,558 4,913 8,984 14,036 17,525 13,594 8,373 104,602

San Benito 172 77 40 252 450 1,030 3,677 3,094 788 312 167 4 10,063

Total 2,809 2,230 1,439 2,443 10,689 19,588 8,590 12,078 14,824 17,837 13,761 8,377 114,665

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.

Note 1: Cross Valley Canal section represents delivereis on behalf of the contractors listed, not necessarily what flows went into the Cross Valley Canal.

Note 2: Allocation of 120 AF for Health & Safety to County of Fresno. Deliveries for January and February 2016 provided out of Millerton Lake.
### §7682. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to the President such sums as may be necessary for the fiscal year 2004 and each fiscal year thereafter to carry out section 262p–8 of this title.

#### (b) Availability of funds

Amounts appropriated pursuant to subsection (a) are authorized to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 108–25, title V, §503, May 27, 2003, 117 Stat. 749.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1928
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              111
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1928
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    57
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    87
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (30)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (30)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (30)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)


</TABLE>
Figure 3.6. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the upstream vicinity of Blue Parkway. 

94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20"

39°01'40"

39°01'50"

39°02'

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

Blue Parkway Brighton Avenue

 Hardesty Avenue

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 29,970 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 760 feet

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

>8 to 10

>10 to 12

>12 to 14

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                   UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             Date: February 17, 2006

                        Commission File Number: 001-32305


                                   CORPBANCA
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)


                         Huerfanos 1072, Santiago, Chile
                     ---------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)



     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                        Form 20-F [X]    Form 40-F [ ]

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                        Yes [ ]          No [X]

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.
<PAGE>
     On February 17, 2006, Corpbanca published a notice announcing the proposed
payment of a dividend to those shareholders' of record listed in the
shareholders' registry as of the record date of February 22, 2006, at its
upcoming Ordinary Shareholders' Meeting scheduled for February 28, 2006, in the
Chilean newspaper Diario La Tercera.

     An unofficial English language translation of the notice is attached hereto
as Exhibit 99.1.
<PAGE>
                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


  Date:  February 17, 2006


                                     CORPBANCA



                                     By:     /s/ Claudio Chamorro Carrizo
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name:    Claudio Chamorro Carrizo
                                        Title:   Division Manager - Planning and
                                                 Development Control
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

99.1           Unofficial English language translation of the announcement
               published February 17, 2006, in the Chilean newspaper Diario La
               Tercera regarding Corpbanca's proposed payment of a dividend to
               its shareholders of record.
Exhibit
13.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of eFuture Information Technology
Inc. (the “Company”) (the “Report”), I, Adam Yan, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




June
      29, 2010
              
              /s/
      Adam YanAdam
      YanChief
      Executive Officer