alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 138

 139

 133

 135

 131

 126

 125

 126

 128

 128

 133

 127

 128

 138

 135

 141

 142

 137

 137

 138

 142

 151

 143

 149

 148

 147

 149

 144

 144

 150

 148

 128

 124

 120

 123

 118

 117

 114

 114

 116

 118

 117

 119

 117

 121

 111

 128

 130

 132

 132

 131

 132

 136

 136

 138

 137

 124

 138

 138

 136

 138

 139

 133

 130

 128

 128

 125

 122

 120

 120

 122

 122

 123

 123

 122

 130

 130

 131

 134

 135

 134

 134

 136

 138

 139

 141

 142

 140

 144

 141

 140

 143

 143

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### § 725.476 Issuance of decision and order.

Within 20 days after the official termination of the hearing (see § 725.475), the administrative law judge shall issue a decision and order with respect to the claim making an award to the claimant, rejecting the claim, or taking such other action as is appropriate.
### §1166. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–117, §6, Oct. 31, 1967, 81 Stat. 338, which provided for costs incident to making the payments authorized by this subchapter to be paid from the judgment fund, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA High Frequency Model of Cascade NoiseClosed form asymptotic expressions for computing high frequency noise generated by an annular cascade in an infinite duct containing a uniform flow are presented. There are two new elements in this work. First, the annular duct mode representation does not rely on the often-used Bessel function expansion resulting in simpler expressions for both the radial eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the duct. In particular, the new representation provides an explicit approximate formula for the radial eigenvalues obviating the need for solutions of the transcendental annular duct eigenvalue equation. Also, the radial eigenfunctions are represented in terms of exponentials eliminating the numerical problems associated with generating the Bessel functions on a computer. The second new element is the construction of an unsteady response model for an annular cascade. The new construction satisfies the boundary conditions on both the cascade and duct walls simultaneously adding a new level of realism to the noise calculations. Preliminary results which demonstrate the effectiveness of the new elements are presented. A discussion of the utility of the asymptotic formulas for calculating cascade discrete tone as well as broadband noise is also included.Document ID19980236870Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsEnvia, Edmane*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1998Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208495E-11289AIAA Paper 98-2318NASA/TM-1998-208495Meeting InformationMeeting: Aeroacoustics ConferenceLocation: ToulouseCountry: FranceStart Date: June 2, 1998End Date: June 4, 1998Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Confederation of European Aerospace SocietiesFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-03-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980236870.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §17. Government of Naval Asylum

The asylum for disabled and decrepit Navy officers, seamen, and marines shall be governed in accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Navy.

(R.S. §4811.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4811 derived from act Feb. 26, 1811, ch. 26, §4, 2 Stat. 650.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 290 (Sub No. 5) (2004-4)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2004 rail cost 
adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2004 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.097. 
The fourth quarter 2003 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.544. The fourth quarter 
2004 RCAF-5 is 0.519.

EFFECTIVE DATE: October 1, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541. [Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1-800-877-
8339.]

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision. To purchase a copy of the full decision, call ASAP 
Document Solutions at (301) 577-2600. [Assistance for the hearing 
impaired is available through FIRS: 1-800-877-8339.]
    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or energy conservation.
    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), we conclude that our action will not 
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    Decided: September 13, 2004.

    By the Board, Chairman Nober, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Buttrey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-21355 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
June 24, 2015

Mr. John Massey

5080 Batavia Road Cincinnati, OH 45244

Dear Mr. Massey:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 5, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2133), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
### §5513. Proposal for consideration by International Civil Aviation Organization

Not later than 60 days after November 16, 1990, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, shall propose to the International Civil Aviation Organization the establishment of a comprehensive aviation security program which shall include (1) training for airport security personnel, (2) grants for security equipment acquisition for certain nations, and (3) expansion of the appropriate utilization of canine teams in the detection of explosive devices in all airport areas, including use in passenger screening areas and nonpublic baggage assembly and processing areas.

(Pub. L. 101–604, title II, §215, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3087.)
§ 225.52 Reasons for recomputing a PIA. There are three major reasons for recomputing a PIA: ( a ) Recomputation to consider additional earnings.
( b ) Recomputation when an employee is eligible for periodic pension payments based on other than railroad or social security earnings.
( c ) Recomputation to use a new or different PIA formula, as provided in section 215(f) of the Social Security Act.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Historicalphysical and chemical data for water in Lake Powell and from Glen Canyon Damreleases, Utah-Arizona, 1964-2013**
 
Report | Metadata | Data
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.121:471
Item Number:0621-K (online)
CGP systemNumber:000943398
 
May 2, 2018
#### STATE, Respondent, v. BECK, Appellant.

(239 N. W. 185.)

(File No. 6772.

Opinion filed November 10, 1931.)

*Robert C. Hayes*and *Clinton G. Richards,*both of Deadwood, for Appellant.

*M. Q. Sharpe,*Attorney General, and *Prank W. Mitchell,*Assistant Attorney General, for the -State.

PER -CURIAM.

 This is an appeal from a judgment pursuant to a verdict of guilty in a criminal case. A majority of the judges think that the appellant did not receive the fair and impartial trial intended to be guaranteed to him by the Constitution *208of this state. The judges are not in agreement, however, as to their reasons for so thinking. An expression of precise reasons not concurred in by a majority of the judges would constitute no binding precedent of this court and would not be helpful to either the trial court or the bar. It seems pointless, therefore, for the several judges to set forth the reasons that influence them individually to concur in the ultimate conclusion which the majority have arrived at.

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore reversed without further opinion, and the cause remanded for new trial.

POLLE'Y, P. J., and CAMPBELL and WARREN, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., disqualified and not sitting.

RUDOLPH, J., dissents.
#### § 418.3401 What are resources?

For purposes of this subpart, resources are cash or other assets that an individual owns and could convert to cash to be used for his or her support and maintenance.
#### Prokop Omelan, as Administrator of the Estate of Anastasia Omelan, Deceased, Respondent, v. Jacob Nahirny, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Exhibit 99(a)



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing
of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003 (the Report) by CompuCom Systems, Inc. (Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ J. Edward
Coleman

J. Edward Coleman,

Chairman of the Board, President,

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEnergy Efficient Engine Low Pressure Subsystem Aerodynamic AnalysisThe objective of this study was to demonstrate the capability to analyze the aerodynamic performance of the complete low pressure subsystem (LPS) of the Energy Efficient Engine (EEE). Detailed analyses were performed using three- dimensional Navier-Stokes numerical models employing advanced clustered processor computing platforms. The analysis evaluates the impact of steady aerodynamic interaction effects between the components of the LPS at design and off- design operating conditions. Mechanical coupling is provided by adjusting the rotational speed of common shaft-mounted components until a power balance is achieved. The Navier-Stokes modeling of the complete low pressure subsystem provides critical knowledge of component acro/mechanical interactions that previously were unknown to the designer until after hardware testing.Document ID19980219339Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsHall, Edward J.*(Allison Engine Co. Indianapolis, IN United States)*Delaney, Robert A.*(Allison Engine Co. Indianapolis, IN United States)*Lynn, Sean R.*(Allison Engine Co. Indianapolis, IN United States)*Veres, Joseph P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1998Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208402NAS 1.15:208402AIAA Paper 98-3119E-11234Meeting InformationMeeting: PropulsionLocation: Cleveland, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 13, 1998End Date: July 15, 1998Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Society for Electrical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-27394PROJECT: RTOP 509-10-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980219339.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### SUBCHAPTER I—HIGHER EDUCATION TRIBAL GRANT AUTHORIZATION
SECOND DIVISION

MILLER, P. J.,

ANDREWS and BRANCH, JJ.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

http://www.gaappeals.us/rules

January 24, 2018

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A15A1858. THE STATE v. WILLIAMS.

BRANCH, Judge.

In State v. Williams, 336 Ga. App. 97 (783 SE2d 700) (2016), this Court

reversed the trial court’s grant of Michael Lloyd Williams’s motion to suppress his

statement to police following arrest. The Supreme Court of Georgia granted certiorari,

vacated the decision of this Court, and directed that the case be remanded to the trial

court for further clarification on the specific findings that form the basis for its legal

conclusions with regard to Williams’s motion to suppress. Williams v. State, 301 Ga.

60 (799 SE2d 779) (2017). We therefore vacate our previous opinion, adopt the

decision of the Supreme Court, and remand this case to the trial court for clarification

of its findings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision.

Case remanded with direction. Miller, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.
January 2024

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

2,173

1 740.92 2,076 -97 27 76 0

2 739.49 2,006 -70 39 74 0

3 738.46 1,956 -50 49 74 0

4 736.62 1,869 -87 30 74 0

5 734.37 1,766 -103 20 72 0

6 731.95 1,659 -107 18 72 0

7 729.13 1,539 -120 12 72 0

8 727.63 1,478 -61 9 40 0

9 728.29 1,505 27 14 0 0

10 729.02 1,535 30 15 0 0

11 729.64 1,561 26 13 0 0

12 730.22 1,585 24 12 0 0

13 732.65 1,690 105 53 0 0

14 734.69 1,780 90 45 0 0

15 736.06 1,843 63 32 0 0

16 737.42 1,906 63 32 0 0

17 736.42 1,859 -47 40 64 0

18 729.31 1,547 -312 23 180 0

19 725.44 1,390 -157 7 86 0

20 738.91 1,978 588 296 0 0

21 754.67 2,842 864 436 0 0

22 756.92 2,980 138 412 342 0

23 747.03 2,397 -583 188 482 0

24 735.46 1,815 -582 165 458 0

25 730.04 1,578 -237 127 246 0

26 734.58 1,775 197 99 0 0

27 737.92 1,930 155 78 0 0

28 740.58 2,059 129 65 0 0

29 734.72 1,781 -278 66 206 0

30 729.00 1,534 -247 43 168 0

31 734.96 1,792 258 130 0 0

TOTALS -381 2,595 2,786 0

ACRE-FEET -381 5,147 5,526 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 5,526

Spill 0

Total 5,526

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 2/10/2024
 Permit Condition 11

– Change Emission Point Characteristics.

The Department has updated this permit condition to reflect the actual stack parameter s.

 Permit Condition 12, Footnote 5

– Compliance Demonstration(s)

. The footnotes and this section have been updated to reflect the current testing requirements and standard permit languag e .

 Permit Condition 1 4.D
– Operating Limits

. Pressure Drop

. The pressure drop has been changed to reflect the averaging period (5

- minute av erage) listed in the Administrative Consent Order (ACO)

. The Department understands that the requested permit modification was submitted prior to the completion of the ACO and the facility understands the requirements as outlined in the ACO

.

 Permit Condi tion 1 4.E
– Operating Limits. Combustion Chamber Temperature

. The minimum temperature (1300 o F) was established as the absolute minimum temperature allowed during normal operations (not to be exceeded). Therefore, the language was not modified to reflect t he minimum temperature as a 3

- hr average

. The permit language was updated to clarify that this temperature applies only during normal operations

.

 Permit Condition 1 4.F
– Operating Limits. Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction (SSM) Plan

. The Department understa nds the facility’s desire to reference 40 CFR Part 63 Subpart A; however, the permit details requirements that must be included in the SSM plan as BACT work practices for the cupola. As such, the current permit language is being retained (i.e., a new BACT analysis would be required to modify the SSM plan)

.

 Permit Condition 1 4.G
– Operating Limits. Scrap Management Plan

. The Scrap Management Plan language has been updated to mimic the language found in the ACO (Section A

- 5.H)

.

 Permit Condition 1 5.A
– Clarify fuel requirements

. The Department is assuming the facility wishes to list natural gas and propane as the allowable fuel s for the combustion chamber

. The facility is required to record the type and amount of cupola fuel used each day. The sulfur content of the cupola fuels used must be recorded as well, and this may be accomplished through sampling or based on vendor’s data provided with each shipment of material. The facility may wish to clarify what it is asking for in the comment provided on N ovember 10, 2014.

 Permit Condition 1 5.D
– Pressure drop across the baghouse

. The Department has updated the permit language to match the requirements in the ACO (5

- minute average)

. The Department understands that the requested permit modification was s ubmitted prior to the completion of the ACO and the facility understands the requirements as outlined in the ACO.

 Permit Condition 15.E
– Combustion Chamber Temperature

. Please see earlier discussion concerning the combustion chamber temperature

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.26

 130.17

 130.13

 130.10

 130.06

 130.02

 129.98

 129.96

 129.94

 129.97

 129.74

 129.66

 129.65

 129.61

 130.15

 129.51

 129.20

 129.70

 129.81

 129.81

 129.39

 129.21

 129.73

 129.59

 129.97

 129.49

 129.62

 129.59

 130.13

 129.76

 129.79

 608

 598

 594

 591

 587

 583

 579

 577

 574

 578

 555

 547

 546

 542

 596

 532

 503

 551

 561

 561

 521

 504

 554

 540

 578

 530

 543

 540

 594

 556

 559

STORAGE

-12

-10

-4

-3

-4

-4

-4

-2

-3

+4

-23

-8

-1

-4

+54

-64

-29

+48

+10

+0

-40

-17

+50

-14

+38

-48

+13

-3

+54

-38

+3

CHANGE

66

66

66

66

66

66

67

67

66

66

56

72

477

223

113

214

75

115

92

90

71

82

244

81

138

67

93

90

121

75

96

INFLOW

 45

 43

 40

 40

 40

 40

 38

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

 455

 206

 36

 196

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

 170

 36

 69

 41

 36

 36

 36

 36

 36

PUTAH

 27

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 31

 32

 32

 28

 32

 40

 23

 19

 50

 50

 54

 55

 51

 54

 55

 55

 49

 52

 50

 50

 50

 56

 58

 58

 58

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .06

 .00

 .01

 .06

 .05

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .07

 .00

 .01

 .08

 .03

 .04

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .16

 1.98

 2.05

 .02

 1.13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .66

 .75

 .06

 .17

 .40

 .08

 .02

 .61

 .09

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

DECEMBER 2021 RUN DATE: 01/20/2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -61 3,347 1,309 2,071 0 .71 8.32

ACRE-FEET -61 6,639 2,596 4,108 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 4,108

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,596

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.32

JULY 1, 2021 17.70

 620

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 17.67
#### Sylvia Hobe, Appellant, v. Charles Zarem, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified by increasing bail to $15,000 and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Mo opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.