alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Certification   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States  Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Statoil ASA, a company incorporated under the laws of Norway (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that: 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2015 of the Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| Date:              | 18 March 2016                                        |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                | /s/ Hans Jakob Hegge                                 |
| Name:              | Hans Jakob Hegge                                     |
| Title:   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 157

 156

 153

 152

 152

 150

 148

 153

 149

 157

 164

 169

 151

 144

 129

 130

 131

 136

 138

 145

 145

 150

 170

 157

 151

 156

 142

 130

 129

 131

 131

 151

 150

 148

 144

 141

 137

 133

 130

 129

 127

 125

 125

 123

 119

 123

 124

 122

 122

 123

 125

 124

 125

 126

 126

 125

 124

 122

 123

 124

 126

 125

 153

 153

 151

 149

 146

 142

 139

 136

 134

 133

 133

 133

 129

 126

 125

 126

 125

 125

 127

 130

 130

 130

 133

 131

 130

 130

 127

 126

 126

 127

 128

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §1300k–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–324, §4, Sept. 21, 1994, 108 Stat. 2157, which reaffirmed Federal recognition of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians and the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians and provided for the bands and their members to be eligible for all services and benefits provided by the Federal Government to Indians because of their federally recognized status, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 718.101 General. ( a ) The Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (hereinafter OWCP or the Office) must develop the medical evidence necessary to determine each claimant's entitlement to benefits. Each miner who files a claim for benefits under the Act must be provided an opportunity to substantiate his or her claim by means of a complete pulmonary evaluation including, but not limited to, a chest radiograph (X-ray), physical examination, pulmonary function tests, and a blood-gas study.
( b ) The standards for the administration of clinical tests and examinations contained in this subpart shall apply to all evidence developed by any party after January 19, 2001 in connection with a claim governed by this part (see §§ 725.406(b), 725.414(a), 725.456(d)). These standards shall also apply to claims governed by part 727 (see 20 CFR 725.4(d)), but only for clinical tests or examinations conducted after January 19, 2001. Any clinical test or examination subject to these standards shall be in substantial compliance with the applicable standard in order to constitute evidence of the fact for which it is proffered. Unless otherwise provided, any evidence which is not in substantial compliance with the applicable standard is insufficient to establish the fact for which it is proffered.
[65 FR 80045, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 35555, June 13, 2013; 79 FR 21611, Apr. 17, 2014]
EXHIBIT 32.1

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                                      2002

      Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc. ("UCI"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly
Report of UCI on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI.
This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement
has been provided to UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

February 14, 2007               /s/ D.  Michael Stout, M.D.
                                ---------------------------
                                D.  Michael Stout, M.D.
                                President and Chief Executive Officer


                                /s/ Jerry F.  Wells, Jr., CPA
                                -----------------------------------
                                Jerry F.  Wells, Jr., CPA
                              Executive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer,
                              and Principal Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-25-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-25-1996
<CASH>                                          11,478
<SECURITIES>                                    11,456
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     18,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,102
<PP&E>                                          45,024
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,553
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,893
<SALES>                                         20,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,577
<CGS>                                           12,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,679)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,679)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,679)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER XXXVI—PEORIA TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA: TERMINATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
Exhibit (e)



                          Certification under Rule 466



The depositary, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, represents and certifies
the following:

     (1)  That it previously had filed a registration statement on Form F-6
          (Infosys Technologies Limited, Registration No. 333-72199), which the
          Commission declared effective, with terms of deposit identical to the
          terms of deposit of this registration statement.

     (2)  That its ability to designate the date and time of effectiveness under
          Rule 466 has not been suspended.



                                      DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY
                                      AMERICAS, Depositary



                                      By:  /s/ Mike R. Hughes
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:   Mike R. Hughes
                                          Title:  Director


                                      By:  /s/ Jeff Margolick
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:   Jeff Margolick
                                          Title:  Vice President
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Managers 

DB Commodity Services LLC: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-158733) of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and Subsidiary of our reports dated February 24, 2010, with respect to theconsolidated statements of financial condition, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements ofincome and expenses, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and Subsidiary. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

New York, New York 

February 24, 2010
### **CHAPTER 35—INDIAN HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—HIGHER EDUCATION TRIBAL GRANT AUTHORIZATION

Sec.
3301.
Short title.
3302.
Findings.
3303.
Program authority.
3304.
Qualification for grants to tribes.
3305.
Allocation of grant funds.
3306.
Limitations on use of funds.
3307.
Administrative provisions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—CRITICAL NEEDS FOR TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT

3321.
Short title.
3322.
Definitions.
3323.
Service conditions permitted.
3324.
Critical area service agreements.
3325.
General provisions.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT STUDENT ASSISTANCE REVOLVING LOAN PROGRAM

3331 to 3338. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—AMERICAN INDIAN POST-SECONDARY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SCHOLARSHIP

3351 to 3355. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—AMERICAN INDIAN TEACHER TRAINING

3371.
Repealed.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24

- 1559

SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II; REV. SAMUEL WHATLEY; PACITA D. WHATLEY , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. CITY OF NORTH CHARLESTON; NORTH CHARLESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; NORTH CHARLESTON CODE ENFORCEMENT; MAYOR KEITH SUMMEY, Mayor at CND , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. ( 2:22

- cv - 04419

- RMG )

Submitted : September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024

Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Samuel T. Whatley, II ; Samuel T. Whatley ; and Pacita D. Whatley , Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1559 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Samuel T. Whatley II, Reverend Samuel T. Whatley, and Pacita D. Whatley appeal
the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for failure to state a claim their amended complaint . On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because the Whatley s ’ s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, they have forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. L ightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”) . Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1559 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 725.530 Operator payments; generally. ( a ) Benefits payable by an operator or carrier pursuant to an effective order issued by a district director, administrative law judge, Benefits Review Board, or court, or by an operator that has agreed that it is liable for the payment of benefits to a claimant, shall be paid by the operator or carrier immediately when they become due (see § 725.502(b)). An operator that fails to pay any benefits that are due, with interest, shall be considered in default with respect to those benefits, and the provisions of § 725.605 of this part shall be applicable. In addition, a claimant who does not receive any benefits within 10 days of the date they become due is entitled to additional compensation equal to twenty percent of those benefits (see § 725.607). Arrangements for the payment of medical costs shall be made by such operator or carrier in accordance with the provisions of subpart J of this part.
( b ) Benefit payments made by an operator or carrier shall be made directly to the person entitled thereto or a representative payee if authorized by the district director. The payment of a claimant's attorney's fee, if any is awarded, shall be made directly to such attorney. Reimbursement of the fund, including interest, shall be paid directly to the Secretary on behalf of the fund.
<TABLE>
Exhibit 11

         FINGERHUT COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
              Computation of Earnings Per Share
      (In thousands of dollars, except per share data)
                          Unaudited



                              Thirteen Weeks Ended      Twenty-six Weeks Ended
                              June 27,     June 28,     June 27,     June 28,
                                1997         1996         1997         1996
Primary

     <S>                     <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
    Net earnings (a)         $    9,909   $    2,145    $  12,470    $       94

    Weighted average shares
     of common stock
     outstanding             46,036,759   46,334,885    46,101,842   46,246,928

    Common stock equivalents  2,852,658    2,485,660     2,653,923    2,456,854

    Weighted average shares of
     common stock and common
     stock equivalents (b)   48,889,417   48,820,545    48,755,765   48,703,782

    Primary earnings per share
     of common stock and common
     stock equivalents (a/b) $      .20   $      .04   $       .26   $      .00
Fully diluted

    Net earnings (c)         $    9,909   $    2,145   $    12,470   $       94
    Weighted average shares
     of common stock
     outstanding             46,036,759   46,334,885    46,101,842   46,246,928
    Common stock
     equivalents              3,288,692    2,810,177     3,240,415    2,705,618

    Weighted average shares of
     common stock and common
     stock equivalents (d)   49,325,451   49,145,062    49,342,257   48,952,546

    Fully diluted earnings per
     share of common stock and
     common stock equivalents
     (c/d)                   $      .20   $      .04   $       .25   $      .00

</TABLE>
Common stock equivalents for primary earnings per
share are computed by the treasury stock method
using the average market price.

Common stock equivalents for quarterly fully diluted
earnings per share are computed by the treasury stock
method using the ending market price, average market
price for the last month or the average of the fully
diluted monthly amounts used in the quarter, whichever
is higher.

Common stock equivalents for year-to-date fully
diluted earnings per share are computed by the
treasury stock method using the ending market price
or the average of the fully diluted monthly amounts
used in the period, which ever is higher.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mauricio Egardo TEJADA-CALDERON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40099.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before SMITH, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*575PER CURIAM: *

Mauricio Egardo Tejada-Calderon (Tejada) his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) *&*(2). He argues that the district court erred in sentencing him under the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764-65, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The sentencing transcript is devoid of evidence that the district court would have imposed the same sentence under an advisory regime, and, therefore, the Government has not borne its burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the district court’s error was harmless. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, Tejada’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. *See id.*at 466.

Because we vacate Tejada’s sentence and remand for resentencing under an advisory guidelines scheme, we do not reach the other claims of sentencing error that Tejada raises. *See United States v. Akpan,*407 F.3d 360, 377 n. 62 (5th Cir.2005). To the extent that Tejada challenges his conviction by asserting that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of § 1326(b) are unconstitutional, the claim is foreclosed, by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Cortez contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Cortez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM Tejada’s conviction, but we VACATE his sentence and REMAND for re-sentencing.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §1032. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–457, §2, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 555, which provided for the advance or expenditure of funds credited to the Absentee and the Eastern Bands for any purpose authorized by the respective tribal governing bodies and approved by the Secretary of the Interior, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Digital Collections
A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates 1774 to 1875
Articles and Essays
Statutes and Documents
**Exhibit 15.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-169514) and Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-165065, 333-165566, 333-169272, 333-171231, 333-172069 and 333-178664) of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV of our report****dated 11 April2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV as of and for the years ended 31 December 2011 and 31 December 2010 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form20-F. 

PwC Bedrijfsrevisoren BCVBA 

Represented by 

/s/ Yves Vandenplas 

Yves Vandenplas 

Bedrijfsrevisor 

Sint-Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium 

12 April 2012
### §13d–3. Tribal authority to change eligibility for, or amount of, general assistance payments

On and after October 21, 1998, notwithstanding any other provision of law, Indian tribal governments may, by appropriate changes in eligibility criteria or by other means, change eligibility for general assistance or change the amount of general assistance payments for individuals within the service area of such tribe who are otherwise deemed eligible for general assistance payments so long as such changes are applied in a consistent manner to individuals similarly situated and, that any savings realized by such changes shall be available for use in meeting other priorities of the tribes and, that any net increase in costs to the Federal Government which result solely from tribally increased payment levels for general assistance shall be met exclusively from funds available to the tribe from within its tribal priority allocation.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(e) [title I], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–231, 2681–246.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the following prior appropriations acts:

Pub. L. 105–83, title I, Nov. 14, 1997, 111 Stat. 1555.

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(d) [title I], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–181, 3009–193.

Pub. L. 104–134, title I, §101(c) [title I], Apr. 26, 1996, 110 Stat. 1321–156, 1321–170; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 104–140, §1(a), May 2, 1996, 110 Stat. 1327.

Pub. L. 103–332, title I, Sept. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 2512.

Pub. L. 103–138, title I, Nov. 11, 1993, 107 Stat. 1392.

Pub. L. 102–381, title I, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1389.
#### § 1824.13 Who pays for publication?

The cost of publication is the responsibility of the claimant or applicant.
also final before Rubio was decided and he does not suggest that Rubio 

applies retroactively. We conclude that the district court did not abuse its 

discretion by denying Leon's motion, see Rubio, 124 Nev. at 1039, 194 P.3d 

at 1228-29, and we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

/itotot j. 

Hardesty 

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge 

Don P. Chairez 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2