alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 685.420 What information is required in the grantee program plan? A grantee's 4-year program plan must describe: ( a ) The service area that the applicant proposes to serve;
( b ) The population to be served and the education and employment needs of the MSFW population to be served;
( c ) The manner in which proposed services to eligible MSFWs will strengthen their ability to obtain or retain unsubsidized employment or stabilize their unsubsidized employment, including upgraded employment in agriculture;
( d ) The related assistance and supportive services to be provided and the manner in which such assistance and services are to be integrated and coordinated with other appropriate services;
( e ) The performance accountability measures that will be used to assess the performance of the entity in carrying out the NFJP program activities, including the expected levels of performance for the primary indicators of performance described in § 685.400;
( f ) The availability and accessibility of local resources, such as supportive services, services provided through one-stop delivery systems, and education and training activities, and how the resources can be made available to the population to be served;
( g ) The plan for providing services including strategies and systems for outreach, career planning, assessment, and delivery through one-stop delivery systems;
( h ) The methods the grantee will use to target its services on specific segments of the eligible population, as appropriate; and
( i ) Such other information as required by the Secretary in instructions issued under § 685.410.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MONTE RUBEN SWANZY,

 Appellant,

v.

RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT

SCHOOL DISTRICT, DALLAS

COUNTY, CITY OF DALLAS,

DALLAS COUNTY COMMUNITY 

COLLEGE DISTRICT, PARKLAND 

HOSPITAL DISTRICT, AND

DALLAS COUNTY SCHOOL 

EQUILIZATION FUNDS, 

 Appellees. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00133-CV

Appeal from

192nd District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC # TX-14-40120)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellee Richardson Independent School 

District=s motion to dismiss and concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order Appellant to pay all costs of this appeal. We further order 

that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
### §1780b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 109–286, §4, Sept. 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 1219, which provided for judgment and dismissal of certain litigation pending on Sept. 27, 2006, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 174

 184

 173

 174

 180

 200

 190

 191

 191

 186

 197

 192

 200

 209

 207

 199

 199

 190

 185

 173

 169

 152

 130

 129

 130

 130

 127

 142

 144

 130

 160

 159

 162

 164

 164

 173

 176

 182

 179

 178

 176

 171

 173

 178

 185

 183

 177

 175

 162

 149

 135

 124

 114

 116

 109

 110

 110

 118

 114

 113

 166

 166

 166

 167

 168

 178

 182

 186

 185

 181

 185

 181

 181

 188

 192

 190

 184

 181

 173

 161

 151

 134

 123

 122

 120

 119

 120

 124

 123

 120

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
Exhibit 13.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
           (pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2004 of Stolt Offshore S.A. (the "Company") as filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date hereof (the
"Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Tom Ehret, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, that:

          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.


Date: June 30, 2005

                                             /s/ Tom Ehret
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Tom Ehret
                                            Chief Executive Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Stolt Offshore S.A. and will be retained by Stolt Offshore S.A.
and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 34,347

 34,290

 34,233

 34,119

 33,948

 34,005

 34,062

 33,552

 33,835

 34,347

 34,347

 34,347

 34,119

 34,119

 33,948

 33,721

 33,665

 33,609

 33,948

 33,665

 33,835

 33,948

 34,290

 33,609

 33,721

 34,119

 34,405

 34,405

 19,312

 19,419

 19,527

 19,563

 19,635

 19,671

 19,853

 20,255

 21,001

 22,463

 25,194

 26,655

 27,448

 27,984

 28,344

 28,526

 28,480

 28,299

 28,119

 27,715

 27,760

 28,435

 28,708

 28,799

 28,708

 28,480

 28,074

 27,670

STORAGE - A.F.

 8,717

 8,615

 8,388

 8,438

 8,768

 8,845

 8,975

 8,975

 9,106

 9,477

 10,246

 10,934

 11,348

 11,712

 11,529

 10,162

 8,691

 7,634

 7,448

 7,564

 8,288

 9,027

 9,237

 8,140

 7,448

 6,522

 5,431

 5,577

 14,204

 14,154

 14,329

 14,405

 14,154

 13,906

 13,832

 14,632

 15,329

 14,811

 14,154

 13,881

 13,685

 13,931

 14,204

 14,480

 13,660

 12,399

 12,749

 12,283

 12,679

 11,986

 11,426

 14,279

 14,940

 13,906

 14,079

 13,466

 106,939

 106,621

 106,577

 106,582

 106,908

 106,056

 106,181

 106,915

 107,766

 113,043

 117,156

 117,942

 119,176

 120,413

 120,920

 119,692

 117,254

 115,248

 115,342

 114,030

 113,708

 115,073

 115,427

 117,630

 117,484

 115,649

 113,666

 84,220

4,636

4,756

4,854

4,405

4,466

5,089

6,497

7,867

9,927

21,986

26,383

15,471

11,434

9,365

8,850

8,907

8,643

8,235

6,825

7,828

13,818

25,584

16,145

14,879

18,738

15,435

14,741

11,914

4,503

4,596

4,832

4,408

4,630

4,659

6,560

8,237

10,356

24,646

28,457

15,867

12,056

9,989

9,106

8,288

7,414

7,224

6,872

6,991

13,656

26,272

16,323

15,990

18,664

14,510

13,741

-2,931

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT SHASTA DAM RUN DATE: May 16, 2007

TOTALS -22,983 305,916

* October 1, 606,784

 30,359

 30,143

 30,100

 30,057

 30,403

 29,629

 29,459

 29,501

 28,495

 31,945

 33,215

 32,125

 32,576

 32,667

 32,895

 32,803

 32,758

 33,307

 33,078

 32,803

 31,146

 31,677

 31,766

 32,803

 32,667

 32,622

 31,677

 3,102

1,341.5

1,350.6

1,360.2

1,368.9

1,378.1

1,387.3

1,400.3

1,416.7

1,437.2

1,486.1

1,542.5

1,574.0

1,597.9

1,617.7

1,635.8

1,652.2

1,667.0

1,681.3

1,694.9

1,708.8

1,735.9

1,788.0

1,820.4

1,852.1

1,889.1

1,917.9

1,945.1

1,939.3

LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV RES

IRON

CANYON

RES

PIT 6 PIT 7

2006 TO DATE

SHASTA

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-264

-318

-44

+5

+326

-852

+125

+734

+851

+5,277

+4,113

+786

+1,234

+1,237

+507

-1,228

-2,438

-2,006

+94

-1,312

-322

+1,365

+354

+2,203

-146

-1,835

-1,983

-29,446

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-133

-160

-22

+3

+164

-430

+63

+370

+429

+2,660

+2,074

+396

+622

+624

+256

-619

-1,229

-1,011

+47

-661

-162

+688

+178

+1,111

-74

-925

-1,000

-14,845
### SUBCHAPTER III—MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 2,364.61

 2,364.97

 2,365.35

 2,365.77

 2,366.13

 2,366.46

 2,366.82

 2,367.16

 2,367.40

 2,367.54

 2,367.60

 2,367.61

 2,367.55

 2,367.47

 2,367.39

 2,367.35

 2,367.31

 2,367.21

 2,367.04

 2,366.84

 2,366.62

 2,366.40

 2,366.14

 2,365.89

 2,365.71

 2,365.57

 2,365.47

 2,365.38

 2,365.23

 2,365.03

 2,359.9

 2,365.7

 2,371.8

 2,378.6

 2,384.4

 2,389.7

 2,395.6

 2,401.1

 2,405.0

 2,407.3

 2,408.3

 2,408.4

 2,407.4

 2,406.1

 2,404.8

 2,404.2

 2,403.5

 2,401.9

 2,399.1

 2,395.9

 2,392.3

 2,388.8

 2,384.6

 2,380.5

 2,377.6

 2,375.4

 2,373.7

 2,372.3

 2,369.9

 2,366.7

STORAGE

+6.1

+5.8

+6.1

+6.8

+5.8

+5.3

+5.8

+5.5

+3.9

+2.3

+1.0

+0.2

-1.0

-1.3

-1.3

-0.7

-0.7

-1.6

-2.8

-3.2

-3.6

-3.6

-4.2

-4.0

-2.9

-2.3

-1.6

-1.4

-2.4

-3.2

CHANGE

7,086

6,889

7,094

7,404

6,931

6,690

6,938

6,781

5,785

5,100

4,444

4,029

3,460

3,287

3,294

3,623

3,612

3,115

2,549

2,340

2,167

2,171

1,858

1,923

2,050

1,977

2,218

2,349

1,808

1,362

INFLOW

 3,868

 3,870

 3,868

 3,861

 3,855

 3,852

 3,855

 3,849

 3,679

 3,811

 3,807

 3,818

 3,833

 3,834

 3,831

 3,823

 3,817

 3,821

 3,826

 3,827

 3,830

 3,829

 3,858

 3,856

 3,388

 2,986

 2,893

 2,933

 2,851

 2,825

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 151

 113

 142

 133

 147

 143

 143

 148

 134

 139

 144

 129

 120

 110

 120

 129

 124

 115

 120

 148

 134

 138

 124

 104

 123

 128

 137

 147

 175

 161

C.F.S.

 .32

 .24

 .30

 .28

 .31

 .30

 .30

 .31

 .28

 .29

 .30

 .27

 .25

 .23

 .25

 .27

 .26

 .24

 .25

 .31

 .28

 .29

 .26

 .22

 .26

 .27

 .29

 .31

 .37

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2003 TRINITY LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +12.8 120,334 109,854 0 0 4,023 8.45 .00

ACRE-FEET +12,800 238,682 217,895 0 0 7,980

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

(1) EVAPORATION AND PRECIPITATION RECORDS TAKEN FROM STATION AT TRINITY RIVER HATCHERY.

SUMMARY RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 217,895

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 217,895

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2002 36.61

 2,353.8

(1) (1)
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Relief for Home Owners

              																	Home Owners' Loan Corporation. 						*Federal Relief for Home Owners*,										August 24, 1933,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/165,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Avis Plumbing & Heating Contractors Corp., Plaintiff-Appellant, *v.*McCormick Theological Seminary *et al.,*Defendants—(Gerhardt F. Meyne Co., Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Third-Party Defendant, Cross-Appellant.)

(No. 56472;

First District (1st Division) —

July 2, 1973.

*Rehearing denied July 30,1973.*

William Henning Rubin, ©f Chicago, *pro se.*

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE BURKE.

*485Timothy J. Riordan, of Burchmore, Good & Bobinette, of Chicago, for Gerhardt Meyne Co.

Edward P. McNeela, of Dent, Hampton & McNeela, of Chicago, for Fidelity & Deposit Co.
### §1231. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 91–417, §1, Sept. 25, 1970, 84 Stat. 868, which provided for judgment funds to be distributed in equal shares to enrolled members of the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

Wicher, Frances

From: Jessi Fierro [Jessica.Fierro@valleyair.org]

Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 9:15 AM

To: Wicher, Frances

Subject: FW: Quantification of Contingency Reductions for SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan

Attachments: ATT00001.txt

The notice itself posted on our website on 5/16, but then we sent this email on 5/21 to coincide with the posting of the document 30 days before the hearing 

From: pm_plans@lists.valleyair.org [mailto:pm_plans@lists.valleyair.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 11:21 AM 

To: Jessi Fierro 

Subject: Quantification of Contingency Reductions for SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan 

The Valley Air District will be presenting its quantification of contingency reductions for the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan at the June 20, 2013 public hearing. The public 

notice is available here: 

http://www.valleyair.org/Workshops/public_workshops_idx.htm#6-20-13R9610

The contingency quantification document will be available on the above webpage by the end of the day today (Tuesday, May 21). Questions and comments can 

be directed to District plan development staff at (559) 230-6100, or at airqualityplans@valleyair.org
§ 802.303 Decision; no oral argument. ( a ) In the event that no oral argument is ordered pursuant to § 802.306, the Board shall proceed to review the record of the case as expeditiously as possible after all briefs, supporting statements, and other pertinent documents have been received.
( b ) Each case shall be considered in the order in which it becomes ready for decision, regardless of docket number, although for good cause shown, upon the filing of a motion to expedite by a party, the Board may advance the order in which a particular case is to be considered.
( c ) The Board may advance an appeal on the docket on its own motion if the interests of justice would be served by so doing.
#### § 686.600 Are students provided with government-paid transportation to and from Job Corps centers?

Yes, Job Corps provides for the transportation of students between their homes and centers as described in policies and procedures issued by the Secretary.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.27

 129.27

 130.06

 129.95

 130.39

 129.81

 130.06

 129.59

 129.74

 129.21

 129.21

 130.11

 130.27

 130.35

 130.38

 130.28

 130.39

 130.44

 130.50

 130.64

 130.64

 130.72

 130.57

 130.64

 130.71

 130.74

 130.71

 130.79

 130.73

 130.52

 130.79

 609

 509

 587

 576

 622

 561

 587

 540

 555

 504

 504

 592

 609

 618

 621

 610

 622

 627

 633

 649

 649

 658

 641

 649

 657

 660

 657

 666

 659

 635

 666

STORAGE

+76

-100

+78

-11

+46

-61

+26

-47

+15

-51

+0

+88

+17

+9

+3

-11

+12

+5

+6

+16

+0

+9

-17

+8

+8

+3

-3

+9

-7

-24

+31

CHANGE

4,731

4,441

4,015

3,697

3,263

2,752

2,341

2,043

1,839

1,671

1,462

1,334

1,291

1,055

1,029

975

935

890

826

787

771

724

723

694

630

679

668

664

653

649

686

INFLOW

 4,633

 4,431

 3,922

 3,653

 3,183

 2,723

 2,267

 2,006

 1,771

 1,636

 1,394

 1,212

 1,196

 964

 941

 894

 818

 745

 672

 621

 600

 537

 521

 465

 395

 458

 451

 441

 441

 438

 438

PUTAH

 60

 60

 53

 50

 57

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 67

 77

 85

 85

 85

 85

 110

 141

 150

 157

 170

 181

 210

 224

 230

 219

 219

 217

 215

 222

 232

PUTAH

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

C.F.S.

 .05

 .08

 .28

 .10

 .11

 .10

 .15

 .24

 .12

 .16

 .42

 .17

 .22

 .19

 .17

 .48

 .34

 .20

 .19

 .21

 .21

 .15

 .20

 .19

 .24

 .02

 .09

 .18

 .18

 .22

 .09

INCHES

 .02

 .38

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .48

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2004 RUN DATE: 04/21/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +133 48,918 3,961 44,867 23 5.75 .88

ACRE-FEET +133 97,029 7,857 88,994 46

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 88,994

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 7,857

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .88

JULY 1, 2003 24.73

 533

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

DECEMBER 21, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 06-14295

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 05-00179-CV-4

RODRIGUEZ SPEAR, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

versus 

WARDEN TONY HOWERTON, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

_________________________

 (December 21, 2007)

Before ANDERSON, BARKETT and HULL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Rodriguez Spear, a Georgia state prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals the
 We do not address the merits of these claims because the district court has not yet had 1

an opportunity to do so first and because a merits analysis is outside the scope of the COA. 

2

dismissal of his federal habeas petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We

granted a certificate of appealability (“COA”) on the following issue:

Whether the district court erred in concluding that appellant’s

following ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims were procedurally

defaulted because he did not raise them in state court: 

(a) counsel pursued an insanity defense against his wishes; 

(b) counsel failed to present witnesses on his behalf;

(c) counsel failed to provide him with an adequate defense; 

(d) counsel failed to present evidence on his behalf; and 

(e) counsel failed to object to the admission of similar transaction

evidence

The district court found these claims to be procedurally defaulted based on

Spear’s purported failure to raise them in state court. However, as Spear correctly

argues, and the state concedes, Spear did adequately raise these claims in state

court, and the district court is therefore in error. Because the district court erred in

finding that Spear procedurally defaulted the five ineffective-assistance-of-counsel

claims specified in the COA, we vacate the decision of the district court as to these

claims and remand the § 2254 petition for further consideration.1

VACATED AND REMANDED.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 2967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings <greek-i>1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER10-879-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: Compliance Refund Report of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Filed Date: 1/10/12.
    Accession Number: 20120110-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/31/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric 
securities filings:
    Docket Numbers: ES12-18-000.
    Applicants: Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation.
    Description: Application of Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation 
for Authorization to Issue Short-Term Debt under section 204 of the 
Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 1/11/12.
    Accession Number: 20120111-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/1/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by 
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: January 11, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1041 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
##### 



Year Ended December 31,2006
    
    2005
    
    2004
    
    2003
    
    2002Pre-tax income from continuing
operations
    
    $
    105,379
    
    
    $
    69,344
    
    
    $
    56,792
    
    
    $
    49,312
    
    
    $
    33,402Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    9,554
    
    
    $
    9,579
    
    
    $
    9,589
    
    
    $
    6,289
    
    
    $
    1,885Amortized premiums
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    91
    
    
    
    61Interest component of rental
expense(1)
    
    
    570
    
    
    
    565
    
    
    
    486
    
    
    
    411
    
    
    
    352Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    10,124
    
    
    $
    10,144
    
    
    $
    10,075
    
    
    $
    6,791
    
    
    $
    2,298Pre-tax income from continuing
operations plus fixed charges
    
    $
    115,503
    
    
    $
    79,488
    
    
    $
    66,867
    
    
    $
    56,103
    
    
    $
    35,700Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges
    
    
    11.4
    x
    
    
    7.8
    x
    
    
    6.6
    x
    
    
    8.3
    x
    
    
    15.5
    x
 Quarter EndedMarch 31, 2007Pre-tax income
    
    $
    28,529Fixed Charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    2,387Interest component of rental
expense(1)
    
    
    130Total Fixed Charges
    
    $
    2,517Pre-tax income plus fixed charges
    
    $
    31,046Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
    
    
    12.3
    x
 
 (1)
    
    Represents appropriate portion (1/3) of rental expense.