alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Michael Martocci et al., Appellants, v. John Martocci, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 501.80

 502.24

 503.02

 503.57

 504.15

 504.71

 505.46

 506.00

 506.52

 507.17

 507.66

 508.05

 508.36

 508.66

 508.57

 508.54

 508.54

 508.68

 508.89

 508.98

 509.12

 509.03

 508.94

 509.12

 509.36

 509.42

 509.65

 509.96

 510.40

 510.80

 511.20

 1,528,379

 1,533,453

 1,542,463

 1,548,826

 1,555,546

 1,562,044

 1,570,761

 1,577,048

 1,583,109

 1,590,698

 1,596,427

 1,600,991

 1,604,623

 1,608,140

 1,607,084

 1,606,733

 1,606,733

 1,608,374

 1,610,838

 1,611,894

 1,613,537

 1,612,481

 1,611,425

 1,613,537

 1,616,356

 1,617,061

 1,619,764

 1,623,410

 1,628,590

 1,633,304

 1,638,022

STORAGE

+6,219

+5,074

+9,010

+6,363

+6,720

+6,498

+8,717

+6,287

+6,061

+7,589

+5,729

+4,564

+3,632

+3,517

-1,056

-351

+0

+1,641

+2,464

+1,056

+1,643

-1,056

-1,056

+2,112

+2,819

+705

+2,703

+3,646

+5,180

+4,714

+4,718

CHANGE

3,386

2,744

5,033

3,642

3,642

3,641

4,747

3,619

3,319

4,090

3,230

2,550

2,030

2,025

0

0

455

906

1,017

930

926

0

0

1,530

1,590

592

1,438

2,199

2,691

2,677

2,666

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 686

 0

 0

 161

 77

 0

 0

 728

 402

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-251

-186

-490

-434

-254

-365

-352

-450

-263

-264

-342

-249

-199

-252

+154

-177

-455

+82

+301

-398

-98

+195

-130

-465

-169

-236

-75

-361

-80

-300

-288

OR

 26

 19

 49

 45

 49

 38

 30

 19

 28

 38

 30

 27

 30

 27

 23

 57

 91

 38

 34

 30

 38

 38

 19

 57

 8

 30

 30

 23

 19

 23

 38

C.F.S.

 .07

 .05

 .13

 .12

 .13

 .10

 .08

 .05

 .07

 .10

 .08

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .06

 .15

 .24

 .10

 .09

 .08

 .10

 .10

 .05

 .15

 .02

 .08

 .08

 .06

 .05

 .06

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR February 28, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2017 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +115,862 67,315 2,054 0 0 -6,851 1,051 2.77 .08

ACRE-FEET +115,862 133,519 4,074 0 0 -13,589 2,085

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 4,074

PACHECO TUNNEL 0 TOTAL 4,074

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2017 TO DATE = .66

 1,522,160

SPILL 0 .08

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = .55
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

p0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

138147

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138147 COA: 280986 Jackson CC: 06-004562-FH JERRY EDWARD HILL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 23, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-15-00497-CV

Style: Evelyn Wyatt v. Cynthia M. Simon, Jerry L. Schutza, Jaikshin S.

Bhagia, and Nanik S. Bhagia

Date motion filed*: July 7, 2015

Type of motions: Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel

Parties filing motions: Appellant’s Counsel Brett L. Bigham

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: N/A

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Appellant’s counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted because it complies with Rule 

6.5 and was served on appellant over 10 days ago with no response filed in this Court.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a), (b), 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, the Clerk of this 

Court is directed to remove Brett L. Bigham as attorney for appellant. Mr. Bigham is

ordered to comply with his notification obligations, including notifying appellant of

her obligation to timely pay for the clerk’s record and to file an appellant’s brief, when

due, if she proceeds without counsel. See id. at 5, 6.5(c), 38.6(a).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually 

Date: July 28, 2015
#### Joshua L. Smallman. *v.*Mary J. Whilter.

1. *Boat—passenger has no right to sell goods on.*A passenger on a boat, chartered for an excursion, has no right to sell goods on the boat, without permission.

2. *Same—action for being prevented selling articles on boat.*A party can not maintain an action against the captain of a boat for preventing her from selling her goods on his boat on an excursion, she having obtained no permission for that purpose, nor can she recover when the captain put her goods into the baggage room, and could not deliver them to her, owing to the crowd getting off the boat, until it was too late for her to get them conveyed to the grounds of a picnic where she expected to make sales.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Henry Booth, Judge, presiding.

*546This was an action, originating before a justice of the peace, and taken by appeal to the circuit court, wherein the appellee was plaintiff* and the appellant, defendant.

The defendant was captain of a steamboat which gave an excursion trip from Chicago to Highland Park for the Young Men’s Christian Association, where there was to be a picnic. The plaintiff went along for the purpose of selling a quantity of peanuts, pop corn, watermelons and the like, which cost her $33.75. The captain put the articles in the baggage room, and would not allow her to sell on the boat. She recovered judgment for $36.75.

Mr. Homer Cook, for the appellant.

Mr. M. L. Knight, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Craig

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We perceive no ground upon which the judgment in this case can be sustained. Appellee had no right to sell her goods on appellant’s boat without *permission*of the officers in charge of the boat or the Young Men’s Christian Association, who had the boat chartered for the trip, and it is clear, from the testimony, that she did not obtain the permission of either. The fact, therefore, that the goods were placed in the baggage room of the boat, and there kept until the boat landed at Highland Park, did appellee no injury of which she can complain, as she had no right to sell them on the boat, and could not legally do so without permission.

Nor do we perceive any misconduct on the part of appellant, or those in charge of the boat under him, after the boat landed, which would authorize a recovery. The goods were taken from the baggage room, and were subject to the order or disposal of appellee, with as little delay on the part of appellant as possible in view of the crowded condition of the boat, and if appellee failed to get her goods off the boat in time to have them taken 'to the grounds where the excursion *547party assembled, by the conveyance she had provided, in consequence of which she lost a sale of the goods, it was her own fault, for which appellant was in no manner responsible.

The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark T. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of Portal Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 15, 2010





/s/  Mark T. Brown

Mark T. Brown,

Chief Financial Officer













#
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Black Nickel Acquisition Corp. III (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Paul T. Mannion, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Paul
              T.
              Mannion, Jr.Paul
              T. Mannion, Jr.Principal
                Executive Officer
              March
                31, 2008
### [§309. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, §1519(b)(1)(A), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 575]

Section, Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 914; Pub. L. 93–87, title I, §152(5), Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 276, related to cooperation with other American Republics.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
#### § 725.702 Who is considered a physician?

The term “physician” includes only doctors of medicine (MD) and doctors of osteopathy (DO) within the scope of their practices as defined by State law. No treatment or medical services performed by any other practitioner of the healing arts is authorized by this part, unless such treatment or service is authorized and supervised both by a physician as defined in this section and by OWCP.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 466 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 466

  To prohibit the Central Intelligence Agency from using an unmanned 
  aerial vehicle to carry out a weapons strike or other deliberately 
lethal action and to transfer the authority to conduct such strikes or 
              lethal action to the Department of Defense.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2015

Mr. Burgess (for himself and Mr. Amash) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent 
  Select), and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Central Intelligence Agency from using an unmanned 
  aerial vehicle to carry out a weapons strike or other deliberately 
lethal action and to transfer the authority to conduct such strikes or 
              lethal action to the Department of Defense.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY OPERATION OF 
              UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE STRIKES AND TRANSFER OF AUTHORITY 
              TO THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
officer or employee of, or contractor or detailee to, the Central 
Intelligence Agency shall use an unmanned aerial vehicle to carry out a 
weapons strike or other lethal action.
    (b) Transfer to Department of Defense.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the President shall transfer to the Department of 
Defense all authority to use an unmanned aerial vehicle to carry out a 
weapons strike or other lethal action.
                                 <all>
```
Have you checked 

all their vitals?

If you are treating a homeless person who might 

be a Veteran, stop, ask and help.

Make the Call!

Created 09/11

www.va.gov/homeless Working together to eliminate Veteran homelessness.

Call VA’s toll-free hotline:

1-877-424-3838

(1-877-4AID-VET)

or visit www.va.gov/homeless for 

help with housing, jobs, health care, 

education and other Veteran benefits. U.S. Department 

of Veterans Affairs
#### Andrew Troiano and Others v. Charles E. Egan and Others.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 130.24

 130.52

 130.03

 129.95

 130.48

 130.38

 130.18

 130.24

 130.33

 130.17

 129.69

 129.49

 129.39

 129.48

 129.53

 129.82

 130.41

 130.30

 130.31

 130.18

 130.04

 129.93

 130.02

 129.56

 129.46

 129.73

 130.14

 129.99

 605

 635

 584

 576

 631

 621

 599

 605

 615

 598

 550

 530

 521

 529

 534

 562

 624

 612

 613

 599

 585

 573

 583

 537

 527

 554

 595

 580

STORAGE

+26

+30

-51

-8

+55

-10

-22

+6

+10

-17

-48

-20

-9

+8

+5

+28

+62

-12

+1

-14

-14

-12

+10

-46

-10

+27

+41

-15

CHANGE

111

108

77

97

180

73

144

102

85

79

71

88

83

87

86

97

118

80

81

80

79

78

94

131

81

144

172

102

INFLOW

 30

 28

 28

 28

 128

 28

 80

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 28

 29

 30

 92

 28

 73

 92

 48

PUTAH

 68

 65

 75

 73

 24

 50

 75

 71

 52

 60

 67

 70

 60

 55

 55

 55

 59

 58

 52

 59

 58

 55

 59

 62

 58

 57

 59

 62

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .05

 .04

 .01

 .04

 .00

 .03

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .04

 .03

 .10

 .06

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .06

INCHES

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .02

 1.32

 .56

 .05

 .00

 .18

 .13

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 1.50

 .02

 .00

 .99

 .07

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 RUN DATE: 03/04/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1 2,808 1,673 1,134 0 1.36 4.90

ACRE-FEET +1 5,570 3,318 2,249 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,249

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,318

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.90

JULY 1, 2009 23.79

 579

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
<PAGE>   1




                                                                      EXHIBIT 5


                          [DYKEMA GOSSETT LETTERHEAD]






                                December 23, 1999



Comshare, Incorporated
555 Briarwood Circle
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108

                  Re:      Directors' Stock Option Plan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         We have served as counsel to Comshare, Incorporated, a Michigan
corporation (the "Company") in connection with the preparation of the
Registration Statement (Form S-8) to be filed by the Company with the Securities
and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the
"Act"), providing for the sale by the Company in the manner described in the
Registration Statement, of up to 50,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock,
$1.00 par value per share (the "Common Stock"), under the Company's Directors'
Stock Option Plan.

         We have examined and relied upon the originals, or copies certified or
otherwise identified to our satisfaction, of such corporate records, documents,
certificates and other instruments as in our judgment are necessary or
appropriate to enable us to render the opinions expressed below.

         Based upon such examination and our participation in the preparation of
the Registration Statement, it is our opinion that the 50,000 shares of Common
Stock, when sold in the manner described in the Registration Statement, will be
validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

         We consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5 to the
Registration Statement. In giving such consent, we do not concede that we are
experts within the meaning of the Act or the rules or regulations thereunder or
that this consent is required by Section 7 of the Act.



                                     Sincerely,

                                     DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC


                                     /s/ Thomas S. Vaughn
                                     Thomas S. Vaughn
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John F. Stanton, Relator, v. Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Writ dismissed and proceedings affirmed, with fifty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 830.98

 830.50

 830.02

 829.52

 829.22

 829.32

 829.52

 829.68

 829.83

 829.96

 830.08

 830.18

 830.23

 830.30

 830.38

 830.43

 830.48

 830.53

 830.58

 830.63

 830.67

 830.72

 830.76

 830.78

 830.82

 830.84

 830.86

 830.92

 830.93

 830.99

 831.03

 38.29

 37.76

 37.23

 36.68

 36.36

 36.46

 36.68

 36.86

 37.02

 37.16

 37.29

 37.40

 37.46

 37.54

 37.63

 37.68

 37.74

 37.79

 37.85

 37.90

 37.95

 38.00

 38.05

 38.07

 38.11

 38.13

 38.16

 38.22

 38.23

 38.30

 38.35

STORAGE

-0.47

-0.53

-0.53

-0.55

-0.33

+0.11

+0.22

+0.18

+0.16

+0.14

+0.13

+0.11

+0.06

+0.08

+0.09

+0.06

+0.06

+0.06

+0.06

+0.06

+0.05

+0.06

+0.04

+0.02

+0.05

+0.02

+0.02

+0.07

+0.01

+0.07

+0.05

CHANGE

97

67

67

59

172

170

161

129

116

104

99

88

60

71

77

60

60

60

63

61

57

65

54

43

55

44

43

65

39

67

57

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 315

 314

 314

 314

 313

 91

 30

 20

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 12

 12

 12

OUTLET

 0

 1

 1

 0

 3

 5

 1

 1

 2

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 1

 2

 5

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .00

 .09

 .15

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .04

 .07

 .14

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JANUARY 2007 RUN DATE: 03/09/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.37 2,430 1,981 620 39 1.14 .01

ACRE-FEET -370 4,820 3,929 1,230 77

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,230

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,929

 5,159

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2006 5.20

 38.76

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### §§868 to 873. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 868, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §413, 60 Stat. 1003; Aug. 31, 1954, ch. 1177, 68 Stat. 1051; Apr. 5, 1955, ch. 23, §2, 69 Stat. 24, related to appointive salaries.

Section 869, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §414, 60 Stat. 1003; July 28, 1956, ch. 770, §4, 70 Stat. 704, related to classes and rate of salaries of Reserve officers.

Section 870, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §415, 60 Stat. 1003; July 6, 1949, ch. 300, §1(a), 63 Stat. 407; June 20, 1958, Pub. L. 85–462, §6(a)(3), 72 Stat. 212; July 1, 1960, Pub. L. 86–568, title I, §113(c), 74 Stat. 300; Oct. 11, 1962, Pub. L. 87–793, §903, 76 Stat. 862; Aug. 14, 1964, Pub. L. 88–426, title I, §120, 78 Stat. 411; Oct. 29, 1965, Pub. L. 89–301, §8(b), 79 Stat. 1118; July 18, 1966, Pub. L. 89–504, title I, §106(b), 80 Stat. 292; Dec. 16, 1967, Pub. L. 90–206, title II, §209(b), 81 Stat. 632; Ex. Ord. No. 11413, June 11, 1968, 33 F.R. 8641; Ex. Ord. No. 11474, June 16, 1969, 34 F.R. 9605; Ex. Ord. No. 11524, Apr. 15, 1970, 35 F.R. 6247; Ex. Ord. No. 11576, Jan. 8, 1971, 36 F.R. 347; Ex. Ord. No. 11637, Dec. 22, 1971, 36 F.R. 24911; Ex. Ord. No. 11691, Dec. 15, 1972, 37 F.R. 27607; Ex. Ord. No. 11739, Oct. 3, 1973, 38 F.R. 27581; Ex. Ord. No. 11811, Oct. 7, 1974, 39 F.R. 3602; Ex. Ord. No. 11883, Oct. 6, 1975, 40 F.R. 47091; Ex. Ord. No. 11941, Oct. 1, 1976, 41 F.R. 43889; Ex. Ord. No. 12010, Sept. 28, 1977, 42 F.R. 52365; Ex. Ord. No. 12087, Oct. 7, 1978, 43 F.R. 46823; Ex. Ord. No. 12165, Oct. 9, 1979, 44 F.R. 58671; Ex. Ord. No. 12200, Mar. 12, 1980, 45 F.R. 16443; Ex. Ord. No. 12248, Oct. 16, 1980, 45 F.R. 69199, related to classes of staff officers and employees, and employees recruited abroad, and table relating to per annum salaries.

Section 871, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §416, 60 Stat. 1004; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §2, 74 Stat. 831, related to appointive salaries of staff officers.

Section 872, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §417, 60 Stat. 1004; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §3, 74 Stat. 731, related to salary and compensation of alien clerks.

Section 873, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §418, 60 Stat. 1004, related to salary or compensation of consular agents.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.