alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A2.1

Principles of Medical Ethics, UN General Assembly

Appendix 2

Glasgow Coma Scale

GLASGOW COMA SCALE

Component Response Score

Motor Response Obeys verbal command 6

(best extremity) Localizes pain 5

Flexion-withdrawal 4

Flexion (decortication) 3

Extension (decerebration) 2

No response (flaccid) 1

Subtotal (1–6)

Eye Opening Spontaneously 4

To verbal command 3

To pain 2

None 1

Subtotal (1–4)

Best Verbal Response Oriented and converses 5

Disoriented and converses 4

Inappropriate words 3

Incomprehensible sounds 2

No verbal response 1

Subtotal (1–5)

Total (3–15)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      13,155,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       2,412,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 50,526,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      19,664,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        19,413,000
<LOANS>                                    191,158,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,966,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             295,462,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 230,754,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                20,676,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          3,457,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 16,937,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,565,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             295,462,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,741,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,735,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               489,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            14,965,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,772,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,869,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,096,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  369,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              69,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,435,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,428,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,428,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   900,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                    670,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   546,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,497,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,915,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  354,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    36,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,966,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,966,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,965,000


</TABLE>
# C_2012199EN.01000301.xml

| 7.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/3

---

Communication pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 concerning the composition of the Conciliation Body instituted in the context of the clearance of accounts of the EAGF and the EAFRD

2012/C 199/05

The Commission has renewed the term of office as member of the Conciliation Body of Mrs SANCHEZ TRUJILLANO and Mr TREVELYAN for the period 1 August 2012-31 July 2013.

---
#### § 725.450 Right to a hearing.

Any party to a claim (see § 725.360) shall have a right to a hearing concerning any contested issue of fact or law unresolved by the district director. There shall be no right to a hearing until the processing and adjudication of the claim by the district director has been completed. There shall be no right to a hearing in a claim with respect to which a determination of the claim made by the district director has become final and effective in accordance with this part.
Table 26

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Preliminary Data Subject to Change San Luis and Cross Valley Canals

2024

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water User Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

SAN LUIS CANAL

City of Avenal 150 153 180 171 654

City of Coalinga 808 1,359 1,061 932 4,160

City of Dos Palos 27 74 119 88 308

City of Huron 65 44 51 56 216

Pacheco WD 0 0 0 0 0

Pacheco CCID Non-project (Hamburg) 80 31 293 637 1,041

Panoche WD 1,259 1,486 1,342 2,557 6,644

San Luis WD 183 418 1,668 3,879 6,148

Westlands WD 85,042 92,184 39,486 45,499 262,211

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 4) 0 0 0 26 26

Mendota WMA (CDFG) (via WWD Lateral 6) 0 0 0 0 0

Kern National Wildlife Refuge (USFWS) 4,177 927 0 0 5,104

0

Total 91,791 96,676 44,200 53,845 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 286,512

O'NEILL FOREBAY DELIVERIES

O'Neill Forebay Wildlife 28 0 81 0 109

San Luis WD Ag 169 140 127 176 612

San Luis M&I 15 11 7 16 49

VA Cemetery 2 1 9 16 28

Santa Nella County WD 17 12 18 20 67

Total 231 164 242 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 865

CROSS VALLEY CANAL (See Notes 1 & 2 below)

County of Fresno 6,021 8,172 1,525 0 15,718

County of Tulare 0 0 0 0 0

Lower Tule River ID 2,846 1,497 4,474 290 9,107

Pixley ID 2,845 1,497 0 0 4,342

Kern-Tulare WD 0 0 0 0 0

Hills-Valley ID 0 0 0 0 0

Tri-Valley ID 0 0 0 0 0

Total 11,712 11,166 5,999 290 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29,167

SAN FELIPE DIVISION

Santa Clara (including Casa De Fruta) 0 0 0 1,008 1,008

San Benito 607 2,679 268 0 3,554

Total 607 2,679 268 1,008 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,562

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.

Note 1: Cross Valley Canal section represents delivereis on behalf of the contractors, not necessarily flows into the Cross Valley Canal.

Note 2: Cross Valley Canal section may include delivery of SJRRP Recapture water and/or water acquired.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Lena Bobrowsky, Appellant, for the Removal of the Body of Louis Bobrowsky, Deceased, from Mt. Zion Cemetery to Mount Judah Cemetery. Independent Zoleszczyker Kranken Unterstustzungs Verein, Respondent.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur.
### §1680m. Results of demonstration projects

The Secretary shall provide for the dissemination to Indian tribes of the findings and results of demonstration projects conducted under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 94–437, title VIII, §823, as added Pub. L. 102–573, title VIII, §811, Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4589.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 94–437, Sept. 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 1400, known as the Indian Health Care Improvement Act, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1601 of this title and Tables.
### SUBCHAPTER LXXIV—YANKTON SIOUX TRIBE: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 25, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00447

- CR

Raul Daniel NORRIS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9017 Honorable R aymond Angelini, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due January 10, 2019, but neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. Accordingly, this court sent a notice to appellant on January 1 4

, 2019, advising that the brief was past due. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8 (b)(2)

. On January 17, 2019, i n response to our notice, appellant filed a letter asking that this court grant him a sixty

- day extension of time in which to file his brief.

First, we advise appellant that future requests for extensio n of time must be filed in accordance with Rule 10 .5(b) (1) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, which governs motions for extension of time

— except motion s to extend time to file a notice of appeal

— in the appellate courts. See id. R. 10.5(b)(1) ; see also id. 38.6(d)

. Second, we will construe appellant’s letter as a motion to extend time to file appellant’s brief. Finally, after review, we GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART appellant’s motion for extension of time. More specifically, we DENY appella nt’s request for a sixty

- day extension, but GRANT appellant a thirty

- day extension of time in which to file appellant’s brief. We ORDER appellant to file his brief in this court on or before February 11, 2019.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

__ _______________________________ Beth Watkins , JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my han d and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 148

 152

 156

 165

 177

 169

 168

 171

 170

 164

 169

 174

 173

 182

 175

 160

 165

 165

 173

 165

 167

 168

 166

 160

 172

 167

 162

 181

 176

 175

 141

 143

 145

 151

 159

 162

 160

 161

 161

 148

 149

 164

 170

 170

 153

 157

 158

 162

 162

 153

 157

 162

 159

 152

 153

 159

 160

 161

 166

 165

 144

 146

 151

 158

 163

 164

 163

 166

 164

 154

 161

 171

 171

 174

 166

 158

 161

 163

 166

 160

 161

 164

 161

 154

 162

 163

 161

 171

 170

 170

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2021

No. 04-20-00606-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.D.C., II, ET AL CHILDREN

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019-PA-00280

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating Appellant’s parental rights, 

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed an Anders brief. In the brief, counsel states that after 

a professional evaluation of the record, counsel finds no reversible error, concludes the appeal is 

without merit and frivolous, and counsel attached a motion to withdraw. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at 

*4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in a parental 

rights termination appeal).

Counsel informed Appellant of his right to file a pro se brief and to request a free copy of 

the appellate record. Counsel provided Appellant with a form request for a free copy of the 

appellate record, and the form lacks only Appellant’s contact information, date, and signature.

The State filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless Appellant files a 

pro se brief.

If Appellant desires to file a pro se brief, we ORDER Appellant to do so within

TWENTY DAYS of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

If Appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than 

TWENTY DAYS after Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).

The motion to withdraw is HELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of January, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
#### Charles S. Furst, Appellant, v. Morris Moskowitz and Another, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
### §1215. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–454, title II, §205, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4793; Pub. L. 104–109, §10, Feb. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 765, which related to prohibition against duplicative services, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-2856

_____________________________

GERALD L. BROWN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Borello, Judge.

September 9, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and M.K. THOMAS and NORDBY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Gerald L. Brown, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.87

 130.91

 130.95

 130.74

 130.83

 130.84

 130.72

 130.80

 130.92

 130.74

 130.93

 130.69

 130.73

 130.80

 130.70

 130.92

 130.97

 130.90

 130.87

 131.00

 130.95

 130.86

 130.95

 130.85

 130.85

 130.78

 130.84

 130.89

 130.93

 130.93

 131.01

 675

 679

 684

 660

 670

 671

 658

 667

 680

 660

 682

 655

 659

 667

 656

 680

 686

 678

 675

 690

 684

 674

 684

 673

 673

 665

 671

 677

 682

 682

 691

STORAGE

-14

+4

+5

-24

+10

+1

-13

+9

+13

-20

+22

-27

+4

+8

-11

+24

+6

-8

-3

+15

-6

-10

+10

-11

+0

-8

+6

+6

+5

+0

+9

CHANGE

515

494

472

470

491

456

457

465

451

457

490

476

470

476

484

482

467

470

493

480

442

410

381

356

393

413

418

418

401

383

384

INFLOW

 42

 41

 41

 41

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 45

 47

 50

 51

 51

 51

 51

 51

 51

 51

 51

 51

 52

 53

 53

 53

 51

 49

 49

 49

 45

PUTAH

 479

 450

 427

 440

 445

 414

 423

 419

 403

 426

 433

 442

 417

 420

 438

 418

 412

 422

 443

 420

 393

 363

 323

 308

 339

 363

 363

 365

 348

 333

 333

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .35

 .41

 .34

 .38

 .23

 .27

 .28

 .31

 .36

 .39

 .33

 .38

 .36

 .34

 .39

 .41

 .39

 .40

 .35

 .34

 .36

 .33

 .28

 .29

 .34

 .40

 .35

 .39

 .36

 .30

 .30

INCHES

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 RUN DATE: 09/02/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +2 13,915 12,422 1,460 31 10.71 .02

ACRE-FEET +2 27,600 24,639 2,896 61

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,896

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 24,639

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .02

JULY 1, 2015 .02

 689

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §1104. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 89–656, §4, Oct. 14, 1966, 80 Stat. 906, which exempted funds distributed under the provisions of this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6833
WILLIAM HENRY FIELDS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN OF THE STAUNTON CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-94-825-R) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Henry Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Fields v. Warden, Staunton Correctional Ctr. , No. CA-94-825-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 28, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. (Nastech), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nastech on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Nastech.

Date: May 8, 2008



|    |  |                                         
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Steven C. Quay                      
|    |  | Name: Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D.       
|    |  | Title:   Chairman of the Board and Chief
|    |  | Executive Officer                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Nastech and will be
retained by Nastech and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Nastech for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
# C_2015440EN.01019201.xml

| 30.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/192 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/192

---

P7_TA(2013)0010

Conclusion of the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety ***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 16 January 2013 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion on behalf of the European Union of the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (13582/2012 — C7-0323/2012 — 2012/0120(NLE))

(Consent)

(2015/C 440/25)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (13582/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (13582/2012),

| — | having regard to the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety adopted on 15 October 2010 at the final plenary of the fifth Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties (COP/MOP 5) in Nagoya and signed by the Union on 11 May 2011 (13583/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Nagoya-Kuala Lumpur Supplementary Protocol on Liability and Redress to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety adopted on 15 October 2010 at the final plenary of the fifth Conference of the Parties serving as the Meeting of the Parties (COP/MOP 5) in Nagoya and signed by the Union on 11 May 2011 (13583/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0323/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 192 and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0323/2012),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0429/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A7-0429/2012),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Protocol; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Protocol;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001085707
<NAME> NEXTEL PARTNERS INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         214,173
<SECURITIES>                                   193,173
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                       839
<INVENTORY>                                      1,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               593,208
<PP&E>                                         179,804
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 934,634
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,469
<BONDS>                                        770,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         36
<COMMON>                                         7,474
<OTHER-SE>                                     131,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   934,634
<SALES>                                         20,594
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,594
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,741
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   748
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              44,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (59,103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (59,103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (59,103)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>