alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 678.300 What is the one-stop delivery system? ( a ) The one-stop delivery system brings together workforce development, educational, and other human resource services in a seamless customer-focused service delivery network that enhances access to the programs' services and improves long-term employment outcomes for individuals receiving assistance. One-stop partners administer separately funded programs as a set of integrated streamlined services to customers.
( b ) Title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) assigns responsibilities at the local, State, and Federal level to ensure the creation and maintenance of a one-stop delivery system that enhances the range and quality of education and workforce development services that employers and individual customers can access.
( c ) The system must include at least one comprehensive physical center in each local area as described in § 678.305.
( d ) The system may also have additional arrangements to supplement the comprehensive center. These arrangements include: ( 1 ) An affiliated site or a network of affiliated sites, where one or more partners make programs, services, and activities available, as described in § 678.310;
( 2 ) A network of eligible one-stop partners, as described in §§ 678.400 through 678.410, through which each partner provides one or more of the programs, services, and activities that are linked, physically or technologically, to an affiliated site or access point that assures customers are provided information on the availability of career services, as well as other program services and activities, regardless of where they initially enter the public workforce system in the local area; and
( 3 ) Specialized centers that address specific needs, including those of dislocated workers, youth, or key industry sectors, or clusters.
( e ) Required one-stop partner programs must provide access to programs, services, and activities through electronic means if applicable and practicable. This is in addition to providing access to services through the mandatory comprehensive physical one-stop center and any affiliated sites or specialized centers. The provision of programs and services by electronic methods such as Web sites, telephones, or other means must improve the efficiency, coordination, and quality of one-stop partner services. Electronic delivery must not replace access to such services at a comprehensive one-stop center or be a substitute to making services available at an affiliated site if the partner is participating in an affiliated site. Electronic delivery systems must be in compliance with the nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions of WIOA sec. 188 and its implementing regulations at 29 CFR part 38.
( f ) The design of the local area's one-stop delivery system must be described in the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed with the one-stop partners, described in § 678.500.
----

**OFFICER'S      CERTIFICATE**

| 1.   | A                review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period                from                June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, and of its performance under                the                Agreement during such period has been made under our supervision;                and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | To                the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has                fulfilled all of its material obligations under this Agreement in                all                material respects throughout the period May 26, 2005 through December                31,                2005; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | The                Master Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification, or                challenging the status of the Lower-Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier                REMICas a                REMIC from the IRS or any other governmental agency or other                entity. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Timothy Ryan                   |   | /s/                Clyde M. Alexander             |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Timothy                Ryan, Managing Director    |   | Clyde                M. Alexander, Director       |
| Wachovia                Bank National Association |   | Wachovia                Bank National Association |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7472

JODIE L. STEELE, II , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CHRISTOPHER RICH; LARRY DUNSTON , Defendants

- Appellees,
and
KENNETH E. LASSITER ; AMANDA COBBS; TODD E. ISHEE , Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:19

- ct

- 03330

- BO )

Submitted : August 29 , 2023 Decided: August 31, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jodie L. Steele, II, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7472 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Jodie L. Steele, II appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants on Steele’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Steele v. Rich , No. 5:19

- ct

- 03330

- BO (E.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7472 Doc: 12 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
### §167. Trust status of lease payments

#### (a) Definition of Secretary

In this section, the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Interior.

#### (b) Treatment of lease payments

#### (1) In general

Except as provided in paragraph (2) and at the request of the Indian tribe or individual Indian, any advance payments, bid deposits, or other earnest money received by the Secretary in connection with the review and Secretarial approval under any other Federal law (including regulations) of a sale, lease, permit, or any other conveyance of any interest in any trust or restricted land of any Indian tribe or individual Indian shall, upon receipt and prior to Secretarial approval of the contract or conveyance instrument, be held in the trust fund system for the benefit of the Indian tribe and individual Indian from whose land the funds were generated.

#### (2) Restriction

If the advance payment, bid deposit, or other earnest money received by the Secretary results from competitive bidding, upon selection of the successful bidder, only the funds paid by the successful bidder shall be held in the trust fund system.

#### (c) Use of funds

#### (1) In general

On the approval of the Secretary of a contract or other instrument for a sale, lease, permit, or any other conveyance described in subsection (b)(1), the funds held in the trust fund system and described in subsection (b), along with all income generated from the investment of those funds, shall be disbursed to the Indian tribe or individual Indian landowners.

#### (2) Administration

If a contract or other instrument for a sale, lease, permit, or any other conveyance described in subsection (b)(1) is not approved by the Secretary, the funds held in the trust fund system and described in subsection (b), along with all income generated from the investment of those funds, shall be paid to the party identified in, and in such amount and on such terms as set out in, the applicable regulations, advertisement, or other notice governing the proposed conveyance of the interest in the land at issue.

#### (d) Applicability

This section shall apply to any advance payment, bid deposit, or other earnest money received by the Secretary in connection with the review and Secretarial approval under any other Federal law (including regulations) of a sale, lease, permit, or any other conveyance of any interest in any trust or restricted land of any Indian tribe or individual Indian on or after December 18, 2018.

(Pub. L. 115–325, title II, §207, Dec. 18, 2018, 132 Stat. 4464.)
April 21, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JAMES NOAH APPLON, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00092-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 839.73

 839.54

 839.69

 840.03

 840.35

 840.60

 840.82

 840.90

 840.97

 840.95

 840.87

 840.77

 840.64

 840.47

 840.26

 839.96

 839.68

 839.36

 839.00

 839.15

 839.38

 839.60

 839.81

 839.88

 839.90

 839.88

 839.82

 839.75

 839.66

 839.52

 839.38

 48.75

 48.51

 48.70

 49.13

 49.55

 49.87

 50.15

 50.25

 50.34

 50.32

 50.22

 50.09

 49.92

 49.70

 49.43

 49.04

 48.69

 48.28

 47.82

 48.01

 48.31

 48.59

 48.85

 48.94

 48.97

 48.94

 48.87

 48.78

 48.66

 48.48

 48.31

STORAGE

-0.09

-0.24

+0.19

+0.43

+0.41

+0.32

+0.28

+0.10

+0.09

-0.03

-0.10

-0.13

-0.17

-0.22

-0.27

-0.39

-0.36

-0.41

-0.46

+0.19

+0.29

+0.28

+0.27

+0.09

+0.03

-0.03

-0.08

-0.09

-0.11

-0.18

-0.18

CHANGE

1,335

1,176

999

913

830

785

751

670

664

607

565

553

532

508

491

431

449

428

401

422

457

468

467

372

344

320

295

287

272

243

243

INFLOW

 778

 695

 299

 92

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 591

 593

 593

 593

 593

 595

 580

 587

 587

 587

 587

 587

 585

 586

 595

 595

 595

 599

 597

 304

 284

 303

 303

 303

 303

 303

 302

 302

 302

 302

 302

OUTLET

 11

 10

 11

 10

 9

 8

 8

 11

 12

 13

 10

 11

 12

 12

 13

 11

 13

 14

 15

 2

 6

 4

 9

 5

 8

 10

 11

 10

 7

 11

 11

C.F.S.

 .26

 .24

 .27

 .24

 .23

 .20

 .20

 .26

 .28

 .32

 .25

 .26

 .29

 .30

 .33

 .27

 .31

 .34

 .37

 .05

 .14

 .10

 .23

 .12

 .20

 .25

 .28

 .25

 .17

 .27

 .27

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .49

 .47

 .50

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MAY 2006 RUN DATE: 08/10/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.57 17,278 14,838 2,404 308 7.55 1.49

ACRE-FEET -570 34,271 29,431 4,768 611

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 4,768

OUTLET

TOTAL

 29,431

 34,199

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.49

JULY 1, 2005 29.77

 48.84

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### §9672. Additionality and avoidance of market distortion

#### (a) In general

Before the Corporation provides support for a project under subchapter II of this chapter, the Corporation shall ensure that private sector entities are afforded an opportunity to support the project.

#### (b) Safeguards, policies, and guidelines

The Corporation shall develop appropriate safeguards, policies, and guidelines to ensure that support provided by the Corporation under subchapter II of this chapter—

(1) supplements and encourages, but does not compete with, private sector support;

(2) operates according to internationally recognized best practices and standards with respect to ensuring the avoidance of market distorting government subsidies and the crowding out of private sector lending; and

(3) does not have a significant adverse impact on United States employment.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. F, title V, §1452, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3509.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 707.36

 707.23

 707.24

 707.40

 707.64

 707.55

 707.70

 708.01

 707.55

 707.97

 707.36

 707.75

 707.71

 707.36

 708.85

 708.19

 707.89

 707.13

 707.34

 707.86

 708.23

 707.33

 707.48

 708.09

 707.32

 707.34

 707.32

 707.31

 707.34

 707.17

 787

 783

 784

 788

 795

 792

 797

 805

 792

 804

 787

 798

 797

 787

 829

 810

 802

 781

 787

 801

 811

 786

 790

 808

 786

 787

 786

 786

 787

 782

STORAGE

-10

-4

+1

+4

+7

-3

+5

+8

-13

+12

-17

+11

-1

-10

+42

-19

-8

-21

+6

+14

+10

-25

+4

+18

-22

+1

-1

+0

+1

-5

CHANGE

12

15

15

16

15

10

14

17

8

16

5

15

10

8

22

7

15

7

14

15

12

0

9

14

0

8

6

7

8

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 17

 17

 14

 14

 11

 12

 11

 13

 15

 10

 14

 9

 11

 13

 1

 17

 19

 18

 11

 8

 7

 13

 7

 5

 11

 7

 7

 7

 7

 7

 0915

 0945

 0930

 1130

TIME

 .09

 .13

 .13

 .17

COPPER

 .38

 .46

 .51

 .56

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2005 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2005

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -15 324 0 333

ACRE-FEET -15 643 0 661

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 661

 661

 797

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .002

 .002

 .002

 .002

Table 7
### SUBCHAPTER LXVI—PEMBINA BAND OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
#### DETLING, Respondent, v. TESSIER, et al, Appellants.

(240 N. W. 598.)

(File No. 7262.

Opinion filed February 5, 1932.)

*Van Slyke & Agor,*of Aberdeen, for Appellants.

*Max Stokes,*of Aberdeen, for Respondent.

*468•CAMPBELL, P. J.

Respondent Detling appealed to the circuit court of Brown county, S. D., from a certain order of the industrial commissioner in a workmen’s compensation matter. Findings, conclusions, and judgment upon such 'appeal were entered by the learned circuit judge. Appellants thereupon sought to move for new trial in the court below and have now undertaken an appeal to this court from the judgment and from the denial of their motion for new trial.

The matter is now pending here on two motions. Respondent • has moved to dismiss the appeal to this court, and appellants in turn have moved for leave to correct and amend their proceedings for settlement of the record if the same be deemed insufficient.

Upon appeal to the circuit court from a decision of the industrial commissioner in a workmen’s compensation case, that court sits as a reviewing court (Wieber v. England, 52 S. D. 72, 216 N. W. 850) and hears the matter upon the record certified by the industrial commissioner (rule 8, Appeals from 'Commissioner of Insurance, 40 S. P. preliminary page 39) and can receive no additional evidence outside the record so, certified (Wakefield v. Warren-Lamb Lumber Co., 46 S. D. 510, 194 N. W. 835).

The record certified to the circuit court by the industrial commissioner is a paper involving the merits and, necessarily affecting the judgment, and therefore becomes.part of the judgment roll (Section 2568, subd. 2, Rev. Code 1919), of the circuit court if a judgment is entered by that court.

The judgment roll therefore contains all the evidence, and whether such evidence justifies the determination of the circuit court may be determined upon, proper assignment of error upon appeal from the judgment alone without motion fqr new trial and without the necessity for any settlement of a record under section 2546, Rev. Code 1919.

It might be necessary to settle a record, in 'part at least, for the purpose of obtaining review of the rulings of the trial court upon admissibility of evidence (see' rule 13 for Appeals from Commissioner of Insurance) or other matters of that sort occurring during the hearing in circuit court and not appearing either from the certified record of the industrial commissioner, the verdict or finding, or the conclusions or judgment; but appellants here do *469not seek to review any such matters. If the judgment roll contains, as it should everything certified to -the circuit court by the industrial commissioner, then that judgment roll properly completed contains everything requisite for the determination on appeal from judgment of all errors now claimed by appellants.

Both motions are denied, without cost to- either party.

PO-LLEY, ROBERTS, WARREN,' and .RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.4 - Administrative Report of the Trust

                              Administrative Report
                                       for
            Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-064 (the "Trust")


                           Payment Date June 15, 2005
                             CUSIP Number 41659FDG6


(i)    the amount received by the Indenture Trustee from Hartford Life Insurance
       Company ("Hartford Life") as of the payment date in respect of the
       principal, interest and premium, if any, on Funding Agreement No. 405064
       (the "Funding Agreement") issued by Hartford Life Insurance Company
       ("Hartford Life").

                         Interest:         $2,430.81

                         Principal:        $0.00

(ii)   the amount of payment on such Payment Date to holders allocable to
       principal and interest on the notes of the Trust.

                         Interest:         $2,430.81

                         Principal:        $0.00

(iii)  the aggregate stated principal amount of the Funding Agreement, the
       current interest rate or rates thereon at the close of business on such
       Payment Date, and the current rating assigned to the Funding Agreement.

               Aggregate Principal Amount:         $1,035,015.00

               Interest Rate:                      4.81%

                               Ratings:

                                       Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                       Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

(iv)   the aggregate principal balance of the notes of the Trust at the close of
       business on such Payment Date and the current rating assigned to such
       notes.

                               Aggregate Principal Amount: $1,035,000.00

                               Ratings:

                                       Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                       Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

AMACAR Pacific Corp., as administrator of Hartford Life Global Funding
Trust 2005-064

By:    /s/ Evelyn Echevarria
       --------------------------
       Name:  Evelyn Echevarria
       Title: Vice President

                                       1
#### § 725.361 Party amicus curiae.

At the discretion of the Chief Administrative Law Judge or the administrative law judge assigned to the case, a person or entity which is not a party may be allowed to participate amicus curiae in a formal hearing only as to an issue of law. A person may participate amicus curiae in a formal hearing upon written request submitted with supporting arguments prior to the hearing. If the request is granted, the administrative law judge hearing the case will inform the party of the extent to which participation will be permitted. The request may, however, be denied summarily and without explanation.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 2
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 99

 104

 99

 99

 100

 101

 94

 98

 91

 92

 87

 84

 83

 83

 81

 79

 83

 82

 86

 87

 91

 90

 102

 112

 115

 112

 110

 104

 114

 124

 90

 83

 92

 88

 84

 84

 82

 75

 78

 75

 76

 76

 74

 74

 74

 73

 76

 76

 77

 81

 81

 74

 74

 97

 105

 102

 100

 98

 95

 109

 93

 95

 96

 92

 91

 91

 88

 87

 84

 84

 81

 79

 77

 77

 78

 77

 78

 79

 83

 85

 86

 82

 81

 104

 110

 107

 104

 101

 103

 118

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER