alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 21**SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES     State or CountryName of Subsidiary of IncorporationTronox LLC Delaware, United StatesTronox Worldwide LLC Delaware, United StatesTronox Pigments (Holland) B.V. The NetherlandsTronox Pigments (Netherlands) B.V. The NetherlandsTronox Pigments International GmbH SwitzerlandTronox Pigments (Savannah), Inc. Georgia, United StatesTronox Western Australia Pty. Ltd Western AustraliaTronox Holdings, Inc. Delaware, United StatesTronox B.V. The NetherlandsTronox Finance B.V. The NetherlandsTronox Pigments GmbH GermanyTronox Pigments Services GmbH GermanyTronox Pigments Ltd. Bahama IslandsTronox GmbH GermanyTronox (Luxembourg) Holding S.a.r.l. LuxembourgTronox Luxembourg S.a.r.l. LuxembourgTronox (Switzerland) Holding GmbH SwitzerlandTronox International ApS DenmarkTronox Pigments N.V. BelgiumA number of additional subsidiaries are omitted since, considered in the aggregate as a singlesubsidiary, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as of December 31, 2006.
#### Frances Kuntz, Respondent, v. Mary Gaimaro et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

No opinion." Present—Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Lewis, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Daniel Cunningham, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
!

!

!

!

!

!

Boise

Lewiston

Pocatello

Twin Falls

Idaho Falls

Coeur d'Alene

Legend

Idaho Roadless area with Surface Water

Idaho Roadless area without Surface water

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Roadless Areas and Surface Water Supply
§ 20.103 Employee responsibilities. It is the responsibility of each employee: ( a ) To be familiar with and to comply with all Federal statutes, Executive Orders, and regulations that govern his or her conduct. Employees are expected to consult with their supervisors and servicing ethics counselors on questions they may have regarding the applicability of any ethics or other conduct provision. Ethics advice may also be obtained from the Solicitor's Office and the Department Ethics Office.
( b ) To report directly or through appropriate channels to the Office of Inspector General or other appropriate authority matters coming to their attention which do or may involve violations of law or regulation by employees, contractors, sub-contractors, grantees, subgrantees, lessees, licensees or other persons having official business with the Department.
**Bank
                of America N.A.**900
                West Trade StreetSuite
                650NC1-026-06-01Charlotte,
                NC 28255www.bankamerica.com





**ANNUAL
      STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**


**OFFICER'S
      CERTIFICATE**




Re:
              Banc
                  of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.Commercial
                  Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries
                  2005-2




In
      connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
      behalf of Bank
      of
      America, N.A., hereby certifies that (i) a review of the activities for the
      period ending December 31, 2005 and of its performance under the Sub-Servicing
      Agreement and
      the
      Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005 have been made under
      my
      supervision; (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Bank of
      America has fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreements in all
      material respects throughout the
      aforementioned period; and (iii) Bank of America has received no notice
      regarding qualification,
      or challenging the status, of any portion of the Trust fund as a REMIC from the
      Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.




Bank
      of
      America, N.A.








/s/
      Sean D. Reilly


Sean
      D.
      Reilly


Principal











/s/
      H.
      Michael Lumadue


H.
      Michael Lumadue


Vice
      President
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4618 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, 

Georgia, as the ‘‘Sidney Oslin Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4618 EH

1 SECTION 1. SIDNEY OSLIN SMITH, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING 

2 AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United 

4 States courthouse located at 121 Spring Street SE in 

5 Gainesville, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Sidney Oslin Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United 

7 States Courthouse’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the Federal building and United States court11 house referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be 

12 a reference to the ‘‘Sidney Oslin Smith, Jr. Federal Build13 ing and United States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4618 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building and United 

Courthouse’’. Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United States SE in Gainesville, Georgia, as the ‘‘Sidney Oslin States courthouse located at 121 Spring Street
<PAGE>   1


                                                                  Exhibit 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated February 19, 1999
included in Cafe Odyssey, Inc.'s (d/b/a PopMail.com) Form 10-KSB for the year
ended January 3, 1999 and to all references to our firm included in this
registration statement.




                                           ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 15, 1999
### §1701. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–395, §2, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 813, which set out congressional findings and declaration of policy, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 95–395, §1, Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 813, provided that Pub. L. 95–395, enacting this subchapter, could be cited as the "Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act".
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 4 (Friday, January 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 776-777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Connecticut Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the

[[Page 777]]

Connecticut Advisory Committee to the Commission will be held at the 
University of Connecticut School of Law, Faculty Lounge, 55 Elizabeth 
Street, Hartford, CT 06105, and will convene at 12:00 noon (EST) 
Friday, January 13, 2012. The purpose of the planning meeting is to 
work to finalize the Committee report on racial profiling.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, February 
13, 2011. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 624 9th Street NW., Suite 740, Washington, 
DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e0f7eac5f0f6e6e6f7abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1a4b3ae81b4b2a2a2b3efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled 
date of the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
email or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC, December 31, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit
[FR Doc. 2012-1 Filed 1-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4477 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require voice mail for certain 

telephone lines paid for by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2016 

Mr. CLAWSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. BLUM, and Mr. ROONEY of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require voice 

mail for certain telephone lines paid for by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Be Responsive to all 

5 Veterans Expeditiously Act of 2016’’ or the ‘‘BRAVE Act 

6 of 2016’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4477 IH

1 SEC. 2. VOICE MAIL FOR CERTAIN TELEPHONE LINES PAID 

2 FOR BY THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF3 FAIRS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 705 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘for medical 

7 officers and facility directors’’; 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

9 the following: 

10 ‘‘(a) TELEPHONE SERVICE FOR MEDICAL OFFICERS

11 AND FACILITY DIRECTORS.—The Secretary’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(b) VOICE MAIL REQUIRED.—(1) The primary tele14 phone line for any facility of the Department shall include 

15 voice mail. 

16 ‘‘(2) The introductory message of any voice mail 

17 under paragraph (1) shall inform the caller of— 

18 ‘‘(A) the name of the relevant facility; 

19 ‘‘(B) when the caller may expect a response; 

20 and 

21 ‘‘(C) another telephone number to call in case 

22 of emergency. 

23 ‘‘(c) PERFORMANCE REVIEWS.—In reviewing the per24 formance of any employee responsible for responding to 

25 messages left on voice mail under subsection (b), the Sec26 retary shall consider the timeliness of such responses.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4477 IH

1 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 for chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is amended 

3 by striking the item relating to section 705 and inserting 

4 the following: 

‘‘705. Telephone service.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Aerial Imaging Technologies LLC

dba Aeritek
Kevin D. Barth VP of Flight Operations & Co

- Owner
2370 Merri Anne Drive Jacksonville, FL 32216
kevin.barth@aeritek.com

April 14 th , 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear Mr. Dan Ngo :

I’m writing this letter to indicate that I submitted proprietary supplemental documentation for Aerial Imaging Technologies LLC, dba, Aeritek , via UPS two day certified delivery to the following address per your instructions that I received in an email on April 1 st , 2015:

ATTN: The Office of Rulemaking FAA Headquarters, Building 10A 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20951

The proprietary s upplemental documentation was shipped to the above address via UPS with tracking

number 1ZAV96433507764458 and includes the following two documents with corresponding appendices described below :

1) Aeritek sUAS, PIC, and Operation of sUAS Document

 Appendix A

- DJI Spreading Wings S900 User Manual

 Appendix B

- DJI A2 Flight Control Station User Manual

 Appendix C

- 3D Robotics Aero

- M Operations Manual

2) Aeritek Operation Manual

 Appendix A

- Flight Release Form

 Appendix B

- Aircraft Flight Log and Maintenance Record

 Ap pendix C

- Permission Acquisition Form

 Appendix D

- Safety Briefing Form

Accordingly , please include the above proprietary supplemental documentation to our application for exemption that has been assigned Federal Docket ID #

- FAA

- 2015

- 0896

- 0001

.

Since rely,

Kevin D. Barth
§ 2.59 How do you file an appeal? ( a ) You must submit the appeal in writing by mail, fax or email to the FOIA Appeals Officer (using the address available at *http://www.doi.gov/foia/appeals ).* Your failure to send an appeal directly to the FOIA Appeals Officer may delay processing.
( b ) The appeal must include: ( 1 ) Copies of all correspondence between you and the bureau concerning the FOIA request, including the request and the bureau's response (if there is one); and
( 2 ) An explanation of why you believe the bureau's response was in error.
( c ) The appeal should include your name, mailing address, daytime telephone number (or the name and telephone number of an appropriate contact), email address, and fax number (if available) in case the Department needs additional information or clarification.
( d ) An appeal concerning a denial of expedited processing or a fee waiver denial should also demonstrate fully how the criteria in § 2.20 or §§ 2.45 and 2.48 of this part are met.
( e ) All communications concerning an appeal should be clearly marked with the words: “FREEDOM OF INFORMATION APPEAL.”
( f ) The Department will reject an appeal that does not attach all correspondence required by paragraph (b)(1) of this section, unless the FOIA Appeals Officer determines, in his or her sole discretion, that good cause exists to accept the defective appeal. The time limits for responding to an appeal will not begin to run until the correspondence is received.
[77 FR 76906, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 11130, Mar. 3, 2016]
##### 



Exhibit 24 POWER OF ATTORNEY Each director and officer of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the
Corporation), whose signature appears below hereby appoints Michael J.
McMennamin and John D. Van Fleet, or any of them, as his or her
attorney-in-fact, to sign, in his or her name and behalf and in any and all
capacities stated below, and to cause to be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Annual
Report) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and likewise to sign and
file any amendments, including post-effective amendments, to the Annual Report,
and the Corporation hereby also appoints such persons as its attorneys-in-fact
and each of them as its attorney-in-fact with like authority to sign and file
the Annual Report and any amendments thereto in its name and behalf, each such
person and the Corporation hereby granting to such attorney-in-fact full power
of substitution and revocation, and hereby ratifying all that such
attorney-in-fact or his substitute may do by virtue hereof. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Power of Attorney,
in counterparts if necessary, effective as of March 30, 2004. DIRECTORS/OFFICERS: Signatures
    
    Title/s/ Michael J. McMennamin
    
    President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)Michael J. McMennamin/s/ John D. Van Fleet
    
    Vice President and Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)John D. Van Fleet/s/ Richard A. Cheap     Richard
A. Cheap
    
    Director/s/ Stephen E. Dutton
     Stephen
E. Dutton
    
    Director/s/ R. Larry Hoover
     R.
Larry Hoover
    
    Director/s/ Edward J. Kane
     Edward
J. Kane
    
    Director/s/ Roger E. Kephart
     Roger
E. Kephart
    
    Director/s/ James D. Robbins
     James
D. Robbins
    
    Director/s/Thomas P. Reed
     Thomas
P. Reed
    
    Director
§ 2.235 Request for notification of existence of records: Submission. ( a ) *Submission of requests.* ( 1 ) ( i ) Individuals desiring to determine under the Privacy Act whether a system of records contains records pertaining to them shall address inquiries to the system manager having responsibility for the system unless the system notice describing the system prescribes or permits submission to some other official or officials.
( ii ) If a system notice describing a system requires individuals to contact more than two officials concerning the existence of records in the system, individuals desiring to determine whether the system contains records pertaining to them may contact the system manager for assistance in determining which official is most likely to be in possession of records pertaining to those individuals.
( 2 ) Individuals desiring to determine whether records pertaining to them are maintained in two or more systems shall make a separate inquiry concerning each system.
( b ) *Form of request.* ( 1 ) An inquiry to determine whether a system of records contains records pertaining to an individual shall be in writing.
( 2 ) To insure expeditious handling, the request shall be prominently marked, both on the envelope and on the face of the request, with the legend “PRIVACY ACT INQUIRY.”
( 3 ) The request shall state that the individual is seeking information concerning records pertaining to him or herself and shall supply such additional identifying information, if any, as is called for in the system notice describing the system.
( 4 ) Individuals who have reason to believe that information pertaining to them may be filed under a name other than the name they are currently using (e.g., maiden name), shall include such information in the request.
[40 FR 44505, Sept. 26, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 56584, Dec. 22, 1983]
#### Maria Luisa ARRIOLA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75798.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Maria Luisa Arriola, Van Nuys, CA, pro se.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, Marion E. Guyton, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

*786MEMORANDUM**

In our May 20, 2004 decision, the court denied Maria Luisa Arriola’s petition for review of the denial of her application for asylum and withholding of removal, but remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) for the limited purpose of addressing Arriola’s motion to remand to allow her to seek protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Arriola now petitions pro se for review of the BIA’s order denying her motion to remand. We review the BIA’s denial of a motion to remand for abuse of discretion. *Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Arriola’s motion to remand to apply for CAT relief because she failed to establish a prima facie case for withholding of removal under CAT. *See 8*C.F.R. § 208.18(b)(2)(ii).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         618,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,968,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   255,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,492,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,268,000
<PP&E>                                       7,486,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,480,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,351,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,285,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,872,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,351,000
<SALES>                                      8,372,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,372,000
<CGS>                                        6,472,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,898,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                388,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   155,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            233,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   233,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
### §1772e. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 100–228, §7, Dec. 31, 1987, 101 Stat. 1560, which related to the compact defining the scope of Seminole water rights and their utilization by the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### Charlotte W. Wilke et al., Appellants, v. Arthur W. Britton et al., Defendants, Harvey D. Gibson et al., Defendants-Respondents, and Distillers Corporation-Seagrams Ltd., Defendant-Respondent, Appearing Specially.

*852No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 136

 135

 136

 151

 134

 144

 135

 144

 141

 141

 153

 140

 135

 133

 144

 139

 141

 140

 139

 137

 146

 189

 149

 149

 151

 164

 163

 158

 157

 161

 157

 131

 132

 129

 131

 129

 132

 130

 129

 131

 129

 127

 127

 128

 127

 129

 130

 129

 135

 129

 129

 134

 135

 134

 140

 141

 145

 144

 147

 147

 151

 147

 133

 133

 133

 138

 132

 134

 132

 132

 134

 137

 132

 133

 131

 130

 133

 136

 135

 137

 136

 134

 139

 144

 143

 145

 147

 150

 149

 153

 153

 154

 153

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 5, 2001

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER