alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.4

                             COMSHARE, INCORPORATED

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
constitutes and appoints Dennis G. Ganster, Kathryn A. Jehle and Michael S.
Khoury, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution, and resubstitution for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign a certain Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to be filed by Comshare, Incorporated relating to the Comshare,
Incorporated 1998 Global Employee Stock Option Plan and any and all amendments
thereto, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that such attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Dated: 12-14, 1999                           /s/ Geoffrey B. Bloom
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Geoffrey B. Bloom, Director
§ 669.220 What is the role of the NFJP grantee in the One-Stop delivery system? ( a ) In those local workforce investment areas where the grantee operates its NFJP, the grantee is a required partner of the local One-Stop delivery system and is subject to the provisions relating to such partners described in 20 CFR part 662. Consistent with those provisions, the grantee and the Local Board must negotiate an MOU which meets the requirements of 20 CFR 662.300 and sets forth their respective responsibilities for making the full range of services available through the One-Stop system available to farmworkers. Where the Local Board is an alternative entity under 20 CFR 661.330, the NFJP grantee must negotiate with the Board on the terms of its MOU and the scope of its on-going role in the local workforce investment system, as specified in 20 CFR 661.310(b)(2). In local areas where the grantee does not operate its NFJP and there is a large concentration of MSFW's, the grantee may consider the availability of electronic connections and other means to participate in the One-stop system in that area, in order to serve those individuals.
( b ) The MOU must provide for appropriate and equitable services to MSFW's, and may include costs of services to MSFW's incurred by the One-Stop that extend beyond Wagner-Peyser funded services and activities.
The Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (CFTC) is the 

federal government agency 

that regulates the commodity 

futures, commodity options, 

and swaps trading markets. 

As part of that responsibility, 

the CFTC has instituted a 

Whistleblower Program.

File a Form tCr

to become a whistleblower, you must complete and submit 

a Form tCr either electronically, by mail or by facsimile.

to submit a Form tCr electronically, visit www.cftc.gov, and 

click on the “File a tip or Complaint” button on the right-hand 

side of the page. use the first link under the description of 

the whistleblower Program.

to submit a Form tCr by mail or facsimile, print a Form tCr 

from the “whistleblower Program” page on www.cftc.gov, and 

send it to the address or fax number below.

whistleblower

Program

Commodity Futures trading Commission

Whistleblower Office

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

Fax: 202.418.5975

866.366.2382 (Consumer Hotline)

Commodity Futures trading Commission
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Payment of Adjusted-Compensation Certificates

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means					 and 	Seventy-Second Congress, 1931-1933. 						*Payment of Adjusted-Compensation Certificates : Hearings Before the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, Seventy-Second Congress, First Session, on House Bills Numbered 1, 27, 94, 4493, 4535, 4539, 5461, 6180, 6584, 6693, 7726, 8016, 9593, 9694, 9929, 10096, 10367, 11117, 11300, 11674, April 11 to 29, and May 2 and 3, 1932*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										April 11 to 29, and May 2 and 3, 1932,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/390,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  August 10, 2010  /s/ Ann F. Massey  Name: Ann F. Massey Title: Chief Financial Officer
§ 725.417 Action at the conclusion of conference. ( a ) At the conclusion of a conference, the district director shall prepare a stipulation of contested and uncontested issues which shall be signed by the parties and the district director. If a hearing is conducted with respect to the claim, this stipulation shall be submitted to the Office of Administrative Law Judges and placed in the claim record.
( b ) In appropriate cases, the district director may permit a reasonable time for the submission of additional evidence following a conference, provided that such evidence does not exceed the limits set forth in § 725.414. The district director may also notify additional operators of their potential liability pursuant to § 725.407, or issue another schedule for the submission of additional evidence pursuant to § 725.410, designating another potentially liable operator as the responsible operator liable for the payment of benefits, in order to allow that operator an opportunity to submit evidence relevant to its liability for benefits as well as the claimant's eligibility for benefits.
( c ) Within 20 days after the termination of all conference proceedings, the district director shall prepare and send to the parties a proposed decision and order pursuant to § 725.418 of this part.
### §5333. IMF-World Bank review

#### (a) IMF review

The United States Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund shall request the management of the International Monetary Fund to prepare a review and analysis of the debt burden of the developing countries, with particular attention to alternatives for dealing with the debt problem including new lending instruments, rescheduling and refinancing of existing debt, securitization and debt conversion techniques, discounted debt repurchases, and the International Debt Management Authority described in section 5331 of this title no later than 1 year after August 23, 1988.

#### (b) World Bank review

The United States Executive Director to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development shall request the management of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development to prepare a review and analysis of the debt burden of the developing countries, with particular attention to alternatives for dealing with the debt problem including new lending instruments, rescheduling and refinancing of existing debt, securitization and debt conversion techniques, discounted debt repurchases, and the International Debt Management Authority described in section 5331 of this title no later than 1 year after August 23, 1988.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3113, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1378.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 1997 for May Drilling Partnership 1984-3 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000739647
<NAME>                        May Drilling Partnership 1984-3
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         283
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  330
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               613
<PP&E>                                         7,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   658
<SALES>                                        1,099
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,123
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                941
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            941
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  92.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  92.89
        


</TABLE>
### §121. Payment of share of tribal funds to helpless Indians

The pro rata share of any Indian who is mentally or physically incapable of managing his or her own affairs may be withdrawn from the Treasury in the discretion of the Secretary of the Interior and expended for the benefit of such Indian under such rules, regulations, and conditions as the said Secretary may prescribe: Provided, That said funds of any Indian shall not be withdrawn from the Treasury until needed by the Indian and upon his application and when approved by the Secretary of the Interior.

(Mar. 2, 1907, ch. 2523, §2, 34 Stat. 1221; May 18, 1916, ch. 125, §1, 39 Stat. 128.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7653

In re: LUCKY IRORERE, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-03-538) Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lucky Irorere, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lucky Irorere petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to rule on his petition. Our review of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the magistrate judge issued a recommendation on November 17, 2003, and that, after seeking and receiving an extension of time, Irorere filed objections on January 14, 2004. Accordingly, because the case is progressing in a timely manner, we deny the mandamus petition. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Figure 3.1. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the upstream vicinity of Blue Parkway. 

94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20"

39°01'40"

39°01'50"

39°02'

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

Blue Parkway Brighton Avenue

 Hardesty Avenue

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

>8 to 10

>10 to 12

EXPLANATION

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 13,930 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 750 feet

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Sure Trace Security Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Leeuwerke, CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: November 19, 2003 | By: /s/ Peter LeeuwerkeName: Peter Leeuwerke
Title: Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Sure Trace Security Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. Caroline Banks, CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: November 19, 2003 | By:/s/ A. Caroline BanksName:	A. Caroline BanksTitle:	Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 2.290 Must I get approval before testifying as an expert witness on a subject outside the scope of my official duties? ( a ) You must comply with 5 CFR 2635.805(c), which details the authorization procedure for an employee to testify as an expert witness, not on behalf of the United States, in any judicial or administrative proceeding in which the United States is a party or has a direct and substantial interest. This procedure means: ( 1 ) You must obtain the written approval of your Deputy Ethics Official;
( 2 ) You must be in an approved leave status if you testify during duty hours; and
( 3 ) You must state for the record that you are appearing as a private individual and that your testimony does not represent the official views of the Department.
( b ) If you testify as an expert witness on a matter outside the scope of your official duties, and which is not covered by paragraph (a) of this section, you must comply with 5 CFR 2635.802 and 5 CFR 3501.105.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.157 Withholding of U.S. workers prohibited. ( a ) *Filing a complaint.* Any employer who has reason to believe that a person or entity has willfully and knowingly withheld U.S. workers prior to the arrival at the place of employment of H-2A workers in order to force the hiring of U.S. workers during the recruitment period, as set forth in § 655.135(d), may submit a written complaint to the CO. The complaint must clearly identify the person or entity who the employer believes has withheld the U.S. workers, and must specify sufficient facts to support the allegation (e.g., dates, places, numbers and names of U.S. workers) which will permit an investigation to be conducted by the CO.
( b ) *Duty to investigate.* Upon receipt, the CO must immediately investigate the complaint. The investigation must include interviews with the employer who has submitted the complaint, the person or entity named as responsible for withholding the U.S. workers, and the individual U.S. workers whose availability has purportedly been withheld.
( c ) *Duty to suspend the recruitment period.* Where the CO determines, after conducting the interviews required by paragraph (b) of this section, that the employer's complaint is valid and justified, the CO will immediately suspend the applicable recruitment period, as set forth in § 655.135(d), to the employer. The CO's determination is the final decision of the Secretary.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4596 

To ensure that small business providers of broadband Internet access service 

can devote resources to broadband deployment rather than compliance 

with cumbersome regulatory requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2016 

Mr. WALDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To ensure that small business providers of broadband Internet access service can devote resources to broadband 

deployment rather than compliance with cumbersome 

regulatory requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business 

5 Broadband Deployment Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4596 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO ENHANCEMENT TO TRANSPARENCY 

2 REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The enhancements to the trans4 parency rule of the Federal Communications Commission 

5 under section 8.3 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, 

6 as described in paragraphs 162 through 184 of the Report 

7 and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order of 

8 the Federal Communications Commission with regard to 

9 protecting and promoting the open Internet (adopted Feb10 ruary 26, 2015) (FCC 15–24), shall not apply to any 

11 small business. 

12 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

13 (1) BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.— 

14 The term ‘‘broadband Internet access service’’ has 

15 the meaning given such term in section 8.2 of title 

16 47, Code of Federal Regulations. 

17 (2) SMALL BUSINESS.—The term ‘‘small busi18 ness’’ means any provider of broadband Internet ac19 cess service that has not more than— 

20 (A) 1,500 employees; or 

21 (B) 500,000 subscribers. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §§162, 163. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 632

Section 162, R.S. §4840; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, §1, 39 Stat. 309, related to appointment of Board of Visitors for St. Elizabeths Hospital.

Section 163, R.S. §4841, related to selection of president of Board of Visitors for St. Elizabeths Hospital.
1

Ogulei, David

From: Garnett, Kim

Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:25 AM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: FW: Question

From: Andrea Geiger [mailto:andreag@cooperenvironmental.com] 

Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:53 PM 

To: Garnett, Kim 

Cc: 'John Cooper' 

Subject: Question 

Hello Kim, 

Please accept my apologies for the delay in our response. I have filled in the blanks below as well as offered a 

little bit of extra information, just in case. It’s always difficult to give a price without a few qualifiers on 

instruments like these... 

The first costs for purchase/installation/certification/training of a MM CEMS are anticipated to be 

approximately $365,000 - $400,000*. The instrument runs about $260,000 of that cost. Annual costs will 

likely be about $25,000.** 

*Factors such as transport length, remote control/polling options, sampling interval (i.e. shorter sampling 

intervals require more tape), and installation complexities will have an impact on the overall initial budget for 

MM CEMS. 

**Annual costs depend largely on sampling interval. For a 30 minute sampling interval, filter tape costs run 

about $19,500/year. 15-minute sampling intervals double that amount annually. In addition, we recommend 

that companies budget for an annual X-ray tube replacement and re-calibration (appx $5-6K). Annual labor 

generally requires one technician approximately 8-10 hours per month for tape changes and general operation 

and maintenance tasks. 

I hope this helps. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have questions. 

Best Regards, 

Andrea Geiger 

Project Manager/Environmental Scientist 

Cooper Environmental Services, LLC 

10180 SW Nimbus Ave, Suite J6 

Portland, OR 97223 

503-670-8127, ext 0 

andreag@cooperenvironmental.com

www.cooperenvironmental.com

Innovation in Monitoring 

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential information intended solely for the use of the 

addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, any distribution, copying, or use of this e-mail or its attachments 

is prohibited. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete this message and any 

copies. Thank you. 
2