alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §7433. Assistance to international efforts

#### (a) Assistance

Nothing in this subchapter shall prohibit the United States from rendering assistance to international efforts to bring to justice Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosovic, Osama bin Laden, other members of Al Queda,1 leaders of Islamic Jihad, and other foreign nationals accused of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity, or from rendering assistance to the International Criminal Court to assist with investigations and prosecutions of foreign nationals related to the Situation in Ukraine, including to support victims and witnesses.

#### (b) Authority

Assistance made available pursuant to subsection (a) of this section may be made available notwithstanding section 7401 of this title, except that none of the funds made available pursuant to this subsection may be made available for the purpose of supporting investigations or prosecutions of U.S. servicemembers or other covered United States persons or covered allied persons as such terms are defined in section 7432 of this title.

#### (c) Notification

The Secretary of State shall notify the Committees on Appropriations, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate, and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, of any amounts obligated pursuant to subsection (b) not later than 15 days before such obligation is made.

(Pub. L. 107–206, title II, §2015, Aug. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 909; Pub. L. 117–328, div. K, title VII, §7073(b), Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5092.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–328 substituted subsecs. (a) to (c) for "Nothing in this subchapter shall prohibit the United States from rendering assistance to international efforts to bring to justice Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosovic, Osama bin Laden, other members of Al Queda, leaders of Islamic Jihad, and other foreign nationals accused of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction

Nothing in amendment by Pub. L. 117–328 to be construed to modify the existing roles or authorities of any Federal agency or official, see section 7073(c) of Pub. L. 117–328, set out as a note under section 7423 of this title.

1 So in original.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Morris Bernstein, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### § 702.391 Appeals; where.

Appeals may be taken to the Benefits Review Board, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C. 20210, by filing a notice of appeals with the office of the district director for the compensation district in which the decision or order appealed from was filed and by submitting to the Board a petition for review of such decision or order, in accordance with the provisions of part 802 of this title 20.
```

[Federal Register: October 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 207)]
[Notices]               
[Page 66074]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27oc10-38]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, November 5, 2010.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-27329 Filed 10-25-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
### §8575. Definitions

In this subchapter:

#### (1) Appropriate congressional committees

The term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives; and

(B) the Committee on Foreign Relations, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate.

#### (2) Covered family member

The term "covered family member", with respect to a foreign person who is an individual, means a spouse, adult child, parent, or sibling of the person who engages in the sanctionable activity described under section 8572 of this title or who demonstrably benefits from such activity.

(Pub. L. 118–50, div. J, §6, Apr. 24, 2024, 138 Stat. 969.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Stop Harboring Iranian Petroleum Act, also known as the SHIP Act, and not as part of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 which comprises this chapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 795.83

 795.82

 795.79

 795.78

 795.76

 795.73

 795.70

 795.68

 795.68

 795.68

 795.69

 795.68

 795.66

 795.63

 795.62

 795.62

 795.62

 795.64

 795.65

 795.66

 795.67

 795.65

 795.62

 795.69

 795.72

 795.23

 795.74

 795.72

 795.71

 795.72

 795.79

 10.12

 10.12

 10.10

 10.10

 10.09

 10.07

 10.06

 10.05

 10.05

 10.05

 10.05

 10.05

 10.04

 10.02

 10.02

 10.02

 10.02

 10.03

 10.03

 10.04

 10.04

 10.03

 10.02

 10.05

 10.07

 9.82

 10.08

 10.07

 10.06

 10.07

 10.10

STORAGE

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

+0.01

+0.01

+0.01

-0.01

-0.02

+0.04

+0.02

-0.24

+0.25

-0.01

-0.01

+0.01

+0.04

CHANGE

17

19

13

19

17

13

13

16

21

22

25

18

16

14

19

23

20

23

23

24

20

13

10

37

28

-104

147

16

17

21

36

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

OUTLET

 7

 7

 6

 7

 7

 6

 6

 6

 6

 7

 7

 6

 6

 7

 7

 8

 5

 3

 5

 6

 2

 3

 3

 4

 5

 4

 4

 6

 5

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .42

 .41

 .39

 .43

 .46

 .38

 .35

 .38

 .39

 .44

 .45

 .39

 .39

 .42

 .44

 .50

 .30

 .16

 .34

 .37

 .14

 .18

 .21

 .22

 .30

 .27

 .26

 .35

 .29

 .19

 .18

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

AUGUST 2020 RUN DATE: 11/30/2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.04 616 465 0 167 10.40 .09

ACRE-FEET -40 1,222 922 0 331

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 922

 922

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .09

JULY 1, 2020 .09

 10.13

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 9.18
**Exhibit 32.(a)****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Annual Report of Huntington Preferred Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald R. Kimble, President of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.       /s/ Donald R. Kimble         Donald R. Kimble    (chief executive officer)    March 24, 2006
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
No. 19-1880V

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CATHERINE GRACE BOSS, * Ch ief Special Master Corcoran
* Petitioner, * Filed: January 21, 2020
* v. * Vaccine Rule 21(a); No Judgment; * Order Concluding Proceedings; Motion SECRETARY OF HEALTH * To Voluntarily Dismiss AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
* Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS 1

On January 16, 2020, Petitioner filed a Moti on to Voluntarily Dismiss pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) in the above-captioned case. In support of this Motion, Petitioner states that the petition was f iled in error as a duplicate. The Vaccine Act states that “[o]nly one petition may be filed with respect to each administration of a vaccine.” 42 U.S.C. §300aa-11(b)(2). Thus, Petitioner’s motion is GRANTED.

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a), the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed without prejudice . The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

1 Because this unpublished Order contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Fe deral Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Order will be available to anyone with access to
the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified mate rial fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of December 31, 2007, and for the period then ended.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT                 
|Glade M. Knight Chief Executive Officer
|                                       
|/s/    BRYAN PEERY                     
|Bryan Peery Chief Financial Officer    

March 3, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133042 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133042 

 COA: 274037 

Wayne CC: 05-010496-01

CHRIS ANTHONY WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her dissenting 

statement in People v Conway, 474 Mich 1140 (2006). 

MARKMAN, J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in his 

dissenting statement in People v Wright, 474 Mich 1138 (2006). 

p0613 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 20, 2007 

 Clerk
### §60. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title III, §347(2), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1422

Section, acts Mar. 3, 1883, ch. 130, §2, 22 Stat. 564; Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 35, 62 Stat. 5, related to inspection and report by Inspector General of the Army.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Samuel Levy, Special Guardian for a Decree Vacating for the Benefit of the Wards of the Special Guardian under the Trust Established for the Life of Florence E. Goldstein, Decrees of the Surrogate’s Court, New York County, Settling the Accounts of Motty Eitingon et al., as Trustees and Executors under the Will of Waldemar Eitingon, Deceased. In the Matter of the Petition of Samuel Levy, Special Guardian, for a Decree Vacating for the Benefit of the Wards of the Special Guardian under the Trust Established for the Life of Blanche E. Bereslavsky Decrees of the Surrogate’s Court, New York County, Settling the Accounts of Motty Eitingon et al., as Trustees and Executors, and the Decree of the Surrogate’s Court, New York County, Settling the Accounts and Approving a Settlement Agreement of Motty Eitingon et al., as Surviving Trustees under the Will of Waldemar Eitingon, Deceased. Motty Eitingon, Individually and as Executor and Trustee under the Will of Waldemar Eitingon, Deceased, Appellant; Samuel Levy et al., Respondents.

Orders, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, each with $10 costs and disbursements to the respondents payable out of the fund. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSRB frustrum 'smiley' cracking phenomenon studyThe thermal protection system installed on the SRB frustrums incurs the formation of debonds between the MSA-2 TPS material and the substrate. The debonds can lead to surface penetrating cracks, called 'smileys' near sealed fasteners and other surface discontinuities. The study concluded that the 'smileys' were caused as the result of stress risers caused by excess fastener sealant (PR-1422) and weakly bonded surfaces. Once the debond occurs, 'smileys' form when the debond area is sufficiently large. The loading for the debond and 'smiley' formation is seen to be depressurization at the vacuum conditions near the end of powered boost. The porous nature of the MSA-2 material covered by a vapor barrier paint provides internal pressure loading of the MSA-2 material. Recommendations for eliminating the problem include elimination of excess PR-1422 sealant and improved attention to bonding surface preparation.Document ID19930011723Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsCruse, Thomas A.*(Cruse (Thomas) Nashville, TN, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 8, 2013Publication DateFebruary 26, 1993Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberTAC-93-001NAS 1.26:192522NASA-CR-192522Accession Number93N20912Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASA ORDER H-11992-DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930011723.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 10.1**

 

1101E. Arapaho Road

Richardson,TX  75081

972-234-6400tel

972-234-1467fax

 

November 7,2008

 

***Confidential***

 

TheBoard of Directors

IntrusionInc.

 

Re:  Intrusion Inc.

 

Gentlemen:

 

Asyou are aware, over the past few years, I have provided financial assistance toIntrusion through various private placements. This letter confirms my intention to make available funds in the amountof up to $1,500,000 to cover cash flow shortfalls, if any, which may beexperienced by Intrusion during the period, ended March 2010.  I also confirm that I have access tosufficient financial assets to make these funds available.  In the event of my death, my heirs will bebound by this commitment.

 

Thisletter is in replacement of, and not in addition to, the original commitmentletter dated March 20, 2008 for $1,500,000.  In essence, I am only extending my originalcommitment one year.

 

Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me.

 

Sincerely,

 
| /s/  G. Ward Paxton |   |
|---------------------|--------|
|                |
| G.  Ward Paxton     |
| President  and CEO  |
| Intrusion  Inc.     |

 

----
----

| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| (2)    | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |
|   | Dated: August 14, 2012                                                                                                                                |
|   |

|                                                                       |   |   |                                                                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   /s/Harold Gardner                                                   |   |   |   /s/ Frank Garcia                                                              |   |
| Harold Gardner                                                             |   |   | Frank Garcia                                                                         |   |
| Interim President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |   |   | Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer) |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7995

ROBBIE SHERRON, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. BUTCH JACKSON; MARY A. WILLINGHAM; F. HANS, Nurse; LINDA PADGETT; DONALD V. MICLOS; MICHAEL BELL, Defendants – Appellees,

and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; CURTIS CLIFFORD, Dr.; DAVID M. HINDS; NURSE HAWNS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:06-ct-03089-D)

Submitted: March 31, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robbie Sherron, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2PER CURIAM: Robbie Sherron seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting partial summary judgment for Defendants and denying Sherron’s motion to compel discovery, motion for a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), motions for preliminary injunctions, and motions for temporary restraining orders. Sherron also seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). With the exception of the portion of the order denying Sherron’s motions for preliminary injunctions, the orders Sherron seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral

orders. The order denying a preliminary injunction is, however, an appealable interlocutory order. See 18 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). However, Sherron failed to file a timely notice of appeal of this order. Parties in a civil case in which the United States is not a party have thirty days following entry of

a final order in which to file a notice of appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(a). Upon a finding of excusable neglect or good cause the district court may extend this period up to thirty

34 days beyond the original appeal period, or reopen the appeal period upon a party’s motion. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6). These time periods are mandatory and jurisdictional. Bowles v.

Russell , 557 U.S. 205, ___, 127 S. Ct. 2360, 2365 (2007); Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978). The order denying Sherron’s motions for preliminary injunctions was entered on August 4, 2008, and Sherron did not file his notice of appeal until, at the earliest, September 6, 2008, three days beyond the expiration of the thirty-day appeal period. * Therefore, Sherron’s notice of appeal was untimely. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

* See Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).