alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 FORM 10-Q FOR IOWA FIRST BANCSHARES CORP AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,852
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                21,980
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     61,893
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        222,592
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 325,931
<DEPOSITS>                                     254,310
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,379
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,976
<LONG-TERM>                                     33,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 325,931
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,425
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  920
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   226
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,571
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,340
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,899
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,672
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       18
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,833
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,237
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         840
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,604
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        6
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,616
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,616
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER III—INDIAN EDUCATION ASSISTANCE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.60

 130.39

 130.22

 130.47

 130.51

 130.03

 129.92

 129.99

 130.11

 130.34

 130.59

 129.68

 130.81

 130.81

 130.44

 130.40

 130.35

 130.11

 130.01

 129.97

 129.99

 130.04

 130.13

 129.98

 129.89

 129.95

 130.10

 130.21

 129.88

 129.82

 644

 622

 603

 630

 634

 584

 572

 580

 592

 616

 643

 549

 668

 668

 627

 623

 618

 592

 582

 578

 580

 585

 594

 579

 569

 576

 591

 602

 568

 562

STORAGE

+2

-22

-19

+27

+4

-50

-12

+8

+12

+24

+27

-94

+119

+0

-41

-4

-5

-26

-10

-4

+2

+5

+9

-15

-10

+7

+15

+11

-34

-6

CHANGE

168

167

171

197

185

163

185

214

235

238

233

132

231

175

155

181

175

166

174

177

184

182

184

183

188

199

194

189

167

197

INFLOW

 64

 59

 61

 63

 63

 64

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 64

 63

 63

 63

 63

 63

 63

 64

 65

 66

 67

 67

 67

 67

 67

PUTAH

 103

 118

 120

 120

 120

 124

 125

 144

 163

 160

 153

 114

 106

 110

 110

 118

 114

 115

 115

 115

 119

 116

 114

 125

 126

 127

 118

 115

 117

 132

PUTAH

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

C.F.S.

 .12

 .15

 .07

 .11

 .00

 .08

 .19

 .22

 .18

 .28

 .14

 .00

 .05

 .09

 .14

 .16

 .20

 .20

 .22

 .26

 .20

 .11

 .18

 .22

 .19

 .23

 .21

 .19

 .13

 .27

INCHES

 .03

 .00

 .09

 .00

 1.01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 2.37

 .67

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .06

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .06

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2010 RUN DATE: 05/07/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -80 5,589 3,676 1,931 20 4.79 4.66

ACRE-FEET -80 11,086 7,291 3,830 40

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,830

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 7,291

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.66

JULY 1, 2009 30.08

 642

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §§907 to 911. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 907, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §512, 60 Stat. 1007, related to commission of Foreign Service officers.

Section 908, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §513, 60 Stat. 1007, authorized Secretary to define limits of consular districts.

Section 909, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §514, 60 Stat. 1008, related to assignment and transfers.

Section 910, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §515, 60 Stat. 1008; Aug. 17, 1977, Pub. L. 95–105, title IV, §404, 91 Stat. 853, related to citizenship requirements of Foreign Service officers.

Section 911, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §516, 60 Stat. 1008; July 28, 1956, ch. 770, §5, 70 Stat. 704; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §8, 74 Stat. 832; Aug. 17, 1977, Pub. L. 95–105, title IV, §405, 91 Stat. 853, related to admissions to class 6, 7, or 8 for Foreign Service officers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 177

 197

 183

 180

 181

 181

 179

 171

 173

 172

 174

 170

 169

 169

 180

 174

 184

 179

 195

 198

 209

 193

 201

 199

 186

 173

 175

 173

 174

 182

 165

 167

 161

 162

 163

 162

 161

 162

 161

 151

 145

 156

 156

 155

 160

 162

 161

 161

 163

 165

 173

 171

 171

 158

 151

 152

 154

 151

 146

 141

 171

 175

 174

 172

 173

 172

 168

 166

 166

 162

 159

 161

 161

 162

 167

 168

 169

 168

 177

 183

 185

 181

 180

 172

 167

 165

 163

 163

 158

 160

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### In the Matter of Elsie Lichtenstein, Respondent, against Myron Lichtenstein, Appellant.

First Department,

April 26, 1949.

*111
      *Paul I. Stern,*attorney *(Seymour Teitelbaum*of counsel), for appellant.

*Moses M. Falk*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The appellant husband appeals from an order of the Domestic Eelations Court of the City of New York, Family Court Division, County of Bronx, directing him to pay $25 per week for the support of his wife. She previously was defeated before another Justice of the same court on the ground that she had refused to live with her husband. The said Justice, however, permitted the proceeding to be reopened on the wife’s assertion that she had changed her mind in that respect and was willing to allow him to return. After the time as of which she stated that she had decided to resume life with her husband, the wife commenced an action for separation in the Supreme Court based upon his alleged refusal to take her back. A motion by her in the Supreme Court for counsel fee and alimony was denied, thus indicating failure to show reasonable probability of success in her separation action.

Thereafter the wife renewed or continued her application in the Domestic Delations Court resulting in the award appealed from.

The evidence indicates that the amount of support granted to the wife must have been arrived at more on the basis of the circumstances of the parties and the husband’s ability to pay, than on the amount required to prevent her from becoming a public charge.

On the former hearing in the Domestic Eelations Court, Justice Polier directed the wife to restore the foster child whom the parties had been supporting but had not adopted, and directed the wife to look for a job. She is a trained hairdresser, twenty-six years of age. She testified on the second hearing in the Domestic Eelations Court (resulting in the order appealed from) that she had neither sent the child back nor *112sought a job. It was her contention that she is physically unfit to work. No physician was called, but she was permitted to testify that she is not a well woman, has been going to a doctor, and that she has periods of illness at regular intervals, in consequence whereof ‘ ‘ I am unable to work. ’ ’

Whether or not the plaintiff has a meritorious cause of action for a separation will be determined in the separation action now pending in the Supreme Court. In the event of her becoming a public charge access to the Domestic Relations Court may yet be open to her.

The record is insufficient to show that she is in danger of becoming a public charge, and no support should have been allowed in view of the denial by Special Term of Supreme Court of any amount for temporary alimony during the pendency of her action for separation *(Matter of Costa*v. *Costa,*247 App. Div. 192; *Matter of Chandler*v. *Chandler,*241 App. Div. 390).

The order appealed from should be reversed and the proceeding in the Domestic Relations Court dismissed.

Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Order. unanimously reversed and the proceeding in the Domestic Relations Court of the City of New York dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 198

 196

 192

 193

 191

 194

 192

 181

 183

 184

 179

 177

 175

 174

 168

 165

 163

 165

 165

 164

 163

 159

 162

 161

 155

 146

 143

 138

 138

 137

 143

 183

 183

 172

 168

 174

 168

 173

 149

 152

 168

 156

 163

 144

 150

 129

 134

 142

 132

 135

 132

 131

 135

 126

 127

 120

 112

 115

 109

 110

 112

 117

 193

 189

 184

 185

 185

 185

 183

 175

 173

 176

 171

 171

 164

 162

 160

 156

 157

 156

 156

 154

 156

 152

 153

 151

 142

 136

 129

 129

 127

 128

 131

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		November 13, 2007
#### Anderson Nat. Bank v. Reeves.

June 15, 1943.

*675Bullitt & Middleton, Chas. W. Milner, and Leo T. Wolford for-appellant.

Hubert Meredith, Attorney General, Earl S. Wilson, and A. E. Funk for appellee.

Opinion op the Court by

Chief Justice Fulton

Affirming.

This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion on the first appeal, reported in 293 Ky. 735, 170 S. W. (2d) 350, upheld the validity of the principal sections of Chap. 79 of the Acts of 1940 as amended by Chap. 156 of the Acts of 1942 (KRS 393.010 et seq.) and affirmed the judgment of the lower court on the appeal but re versed it on the cross-appeal.

On the return of the case to the lower court judgment was entered in conformity with the opinion. This appeal is from that judgment.

We are bound by the opinion on the first appeal, whether it be right or wrong, under our familiar law of the case rule. We have considered the contentions 1) the Act in question conflicts with the National Banking Act and 2) that it is violative of the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution and find the contentions without merit.

Since the judgment is in conformity with the former opinion it is affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 720.39

 709.63

 713.57

 716.55

 718.99

 708.77

 712.17

 714.78

 716.37

 717.58

 718.66

 719.61

 720.50

 721.34

 722.10

 714.79

 707.14

 707.07

 709.50

 708.52

 710.12

 711.25

 712.18

 709.33

 710.67

 711.64

 709.62

 710.65

 710.14

 710.77

 1,200

 851

 969

 1,066

 1,150

 827

 926

 1,008

 1,060

 1,101

 1,138

 1,172

 1,204

 1,235

 1,263

 1,008

 781

 779

 847

 820

 865

 899

 926

 842

 881

 910

 850

 881

 865

 884

STORAGE

-143

-349

+118

+97

+84

-323

+99

+82

+52

+41

+37

+34

+32

+31

+28

-255

-227

-2

+68

-27

+45

+34

+27

-84

+39

+29

-60

+31

-16

+19

CHANGE

27

-7

60

50

43

-15

51

42

27

22

20

18

17

17

15

-7

-37

12

35

2

24

18

15

-11

21

16

-6

17

7

13

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 99

 169

 1

 1

 1

 148

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 122

 77

 13

 1

 16

 1

 1

 1

 31

 1

 1

 24

 1

 15

 3

 0900

 0940

 0950

 0935

 0900

TIME

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .06

 .05

COPPER

 .13

 .18

 .24

 .32

 .30

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 8, 2010

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -459 506 0 736

ACRE-FEET -459 1,004 0 1,460

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,460

 1,460

 1,343

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .004

 .003

 .003

 .002

 .002
#### §§ 701.202-701.203 [Reserved]
Table 29

U. S. Department of the Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley - Streamflow Data

Preliminary-Subject to Change 2018

Mean monthly flow in cfs

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Sacramento River

Shasta computed inflow 5893 4487 10324 8840 4707 3931 3180 2636 2783 2972 3739 4953

At Keswick 3733 3500 3087 3839 8705 10632 13008 10191 8089 7306 4706 4013

At Bend Bridge 5876 4751 6161 7468 9599 11239 12990 11179 8648 7702 5737 6855

At Vina Bridge 7377 5562 8124 9520 9147 9805 11571 9958 7858 7248 5951 7334

At Ord Ferry 6982 4703 8265 9597 6790 7270 8914 8106 7086 6133 4962 6725

At Colusa 7519 5500 8570 10253 6483 6834 8332 8096 7355 5894 4589 7381

Below Wilkins Slough 8067 5759 8937 10069 4868 5276 6599 6899 6964 5630 4447 7710

At Verona 15046 10425 22178 27294 8346 9510 12007 15758 15497 9852 7864 12995

Sacramento at "I" Street 17772 13426 25702 34537 10334 12600 16263 18888 17081 11390 9565 14742

Miscellaneous Stations

Folsom computed inflow 3347 1914 8989 9426 4190 2112 1899 1709 1509 798 923 1668

American R at Nimbus Dam 2694 2782 4206 8678 2359 3391 4791 3280 1802 1510 1860 1813

Kings River at Pine Flat 267 304 252 1185 3902 5924 5884 3548 1517 241 125 113

San Joaquin River

At Friant Dam 396 407 299 376 386 401 436 439 422 388 417 399

Near Vernalis 2270 2136 3459 6873 5234 1614 710 594 927 1838 1565 1389

Putah Creek

Berryessa computed inflow 408 62 942 366 93 23 23 0 0 0 92 121

Putah Creek - Lake Solano 34 32 47 67 49 60 51 36 28 33 53 41

Stanislaus River

New Melones computed inflow 920 478 2259 2704 2024 1333 1203 991 585 522 594 575

At Tulloch Dam 976 1489 606 2045 3618 2038 1609 1597 1202 973 375 235

At Orange Blossom 923 1230 286 1378 2414 776 298 178 278 657 350 275

* Data supplied by Central Valley Operations Office

 Daily mean is derived from 7 am daily reading.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4452 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

825 West 65th Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Charles W. 

Lindberg Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2022 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 825 West 65th Street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Charles W. Lindberg Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHARLES W. LINDBERG POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 825 West 65th Street in Min6 neapolis, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Charles W. Lindberg Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4452 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Charles W. Lindberg 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      31,794,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,723,000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,327,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,174,000
<PP&E>                                      13,992,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,354,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              63,455,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,720,000
<BONDS>                                      1,198,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,642,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,624,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                63,455,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,972,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               67,924,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            (1,845,000)<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              63,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,170,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,034,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,136,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,136,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable are stated at net of allowance for doubtful accounts.
<F2>Comprised of $1,901,000 of interest income and $56,000 of exchange loss.
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 701.504 When does the recreational vessel exclusion in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 apply? ( a ) *Date of injury.* Whether the amended version applies depends on the date of the injury for which compensation is claimed. The following rules apply to determining the date of injury: ( 1 ) *Traumatic injury.* If the individual claims compensation for a traumatic injury, the date of injury is the date the employee suffered harm. For example, if the individual injures an arm or leg in the course of his or her employment, the date of injury is the date on which the individual was hurt.
( 2 ) *Occupational disease or infection.* Occupational illnesses and infections generally involve delayed onset of symptoms following exposure to a harmful workplace substance or condition. If the individual claims compensation for an occupational illness or infection, the date of injury is the date the individual was exposed to the substance or condition.
( 3 ) *Hearing loss.* If the individual claims compensation for hearing loss, the date of injury is the date the individual was exposed to harmful workplace noise or other stimulus that is capable of causing hearing loss.
( 4 ) *Death-benefit claims.* If the individual claims compensation for an employee's death, the date of injury is the date of the workplace event or incident that caused, hastened, or contributed to the death.
( 5 ) *Cumulative trauma.* If the individual claims compensation for cumulative trauma, in which multiple traumas contribute to an overall medical condition, such as a neck condition resulting from repetitive motion, the date of injury is any date on which a workplace trauma worsened the individual's condition. A workplace event will not be deemed a contributing trauma if a corresponding worsening of the condition is due solely to its natural progression, rather than the workplace event.
( b ) If the date of injury is before February 17, 2009, the individual's entitlement is governed by section 2(3)(F) as it existed prior to the 2009 amendment.
( c ) If the date of injury is on or after February 17, 2009, the individual's entitlement is governed by the 2009 amendment to section 2(3)(F).
[76 FR 82128, Dec. 30, 2011]
#### Nettie Wintersteen, as Administratrix, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.