alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4492 

To provide for the approval authority for National Guard flyovers, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2016 

Mr. DUFFY (for himself and Mr. WALZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the approval authority for National Guard 

flyovers, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sound of Freedom 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD FLYOVERS OF PUBLIC EVENTS. 

7 (a) STATEMENT OF POLICY.—It shall be the policy 

8 of the Department of Defense that flyovers of public 

9 events in support of community relations activities may 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4492 IH

1 only be flown as part of an approved training mission at 

2 no additional expense to the Federal Government. 

3 (b) NATIONAL GUARD FLYOVER APPROVAL PROC4 ESS.—The Adjutant General of a State in which an Army 

5 National Guard or Air National Guard unit is based will 

6 be the approval authority for all Air National Guard and 

7 Army National Guard flyovers in that State, including any 

8 request for a flyover in any civilian domain at a nonavia9 tion related event. 

10 (c) FLYOVER RECORD MAINTENANCE; REPORT.— 

11 (1) RECORD MAINTENANCE.—The Secretary of 

12 Defense shall keep and maintain records of flyover 

13 requests and approvals in a publicly accessible data14 base that is updated annually. 

15 (2) GAO REPORT.—Not later than one year 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

17 Comptroller General of the United States shall sub18 mit to the Committee on Armed Services of the 

19 House of Representatives and the Committee on 

20 Armed Services of the Senate a report on flyovers 

21 and the process whereby flyover requests are made 

22 and evaluated, including— 

23 (A) whether there is any cost to taxpayers 

24 associated with flyovers; 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4492 IH

1 (B) whether there is any appreciable public 

2 relations or recruitment value that comes from 

3 flyovers; and 

4 (C) the impact flyovers have to aviator 

5 training and readiness. 

6 (d) FLYOVER DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

7 ‘‘flyover’’ means aviation support— 

8 (1) in which a straight and level flight limited 

9 to one pass by a single military aircraft, or by a sin10 gle formation of four or fewer military aircraft of 

11 the same type, from the same military department 

12 over a predetermined point on the ground at a spe13 cific time; 

14 (2) that does not involve aerobatics or dem15 onstrations; and 

16 (3) uses bank angles of up to 90 degrees if re17 quired to improve the spectator visibility of the air18 craft. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 726.317 Discretionary review. ( a ) Following receipt of a timely petition for review, the Administrative Review Board (Board) shall determine whether the decision warrants review, and shall send a notice of such determination to the parties and the Chief Administrative Law Judge. If the Board declines to review the decision, the Administrative Law Judge's decision shall be considered the final decision of the agency. The Board's determination to review a decision by an Administrative Law Judge under this subpart is solely within the discretion of the Board.
( b ) The Board's notice shall specify: ( 1 ) The issue or issues to be reviewed; and
( 2 ) The schedule for submitting arguments, in the form of briefs or such other pleadings as the Board deems appropriate.
( c ) Upon receipt of the Board notice, the Director shall forward the record to the Board.
[86 FR 1779, Jan. 11, 2021]
Exhibit 32.1







Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Roblin, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 14, 2009

/s/ John W. Roblin
Name:    John W. Roblin
Title:     Chief Executive Officer




---
Table 27
                                    U.S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                           Central Valley Operations Office
 
                                           TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL
 
                                                     1999
Monthly Deliveries in AF
 
     Water Users        Jan    Feb    Mar    Apr    May    Jun    Jul    Aug    Sep    Oct    Nov    Dec    Total
 
 
Colusa County WD           0      0    737   3604  11454  13083  14865   8364   3807   3803    441   1103    61261
Cortina WD                 0      0      0     20    136    172    170     90     84     56      1     14      743
Davis WD                   0      0     51     22    499    569    327    253      0      0      0      0     1721
Dunnigan WD                0      0     51    362   3422   3123   3914   2532    777    347     29    166    14723
4-M Water District         0      0      9    122    694    499    367    354    137     75     24      0     2281
Glenn Valley WD            0      0      0     28    158     81    317    104      9      0      0      0      697
Glide WD                   0      0      0    378   4007   1940   4127   2751    829     30     24     28    14114
Holthouse WD               0      0     21    102    373    274    332    234    194     88      0     36     1654
Kanawha WD                 0      0     21   1515   7722   5691   8181   4290   1530    368     15      9    29342
Kirkwood WD                0      0      0     17    141    112    167    140     90     37      1      0      705
La Grande WD               0      0      0    335   1300    953   1330   1039    164     25      0      0     5146
Myers-Marsh MWC            0      0      0     48     56      3      0      0      0      0      0      0      107
Orland-Artois WD           0      0     84   3020  11525  10453  13907   9039   6101   2932    435    501    57997
Westside WD                0      0    446   2057   8483   8650   8943   4223   2091    875     53     81    35902
 
Total                      0      0   1420  11630  49970  45603  56947  33413  15813   8636   1023   1938   226393
 
Data supplied by Willows Field Division, Water and Lands Division
### NUMBER 13 - 15 - 00314 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE STATE FARM LLOYDS AND DAVID R. CABE

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 1
Relator s , State Farm Lloyds and David R. Cabe, filed a petit ion for writ of
mandamus in the above cause on July 10, 2015

. Relators have now filed an unopposed
motion to dismiss th e petition for writ of mandamus on grounds that the real parties in interest, Horacio Salinas and Maria Salinas, have nonsuited their claims in the underlying cause. Relators thus contend that this petition for writ of mandamus has been rendered
moot and r equest that we dismiss this ori ginal proceeding

. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

and the unopposed motion to dismiss, i s of the opinion that this matter has been rendered
moot. See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc. , 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 ( Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) ( “ A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings . . . ” ); State Bar of Tex. v. Gomez , 891 S.W.2d 243, 245 (Tex. 1994) (stating that, for a controversy to be justi ciable, there must be a real controversy between the parties that will be actually resolved by the judicial relief sought). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the unopposed motion to dismiss and DISMISSES the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 24th day of July, 2015

.
[Graphic omitted] Ahold



                                                        Press Release

                                                        Royal Ahold
                                                        Corporate Communications



                                                 Date:  August 31, 2004
                                 For more information:  +31 75 659 57 20



Ahold appoints Bart Karis as Senior
Vice President General Merchandising



Zaandam, The Netherlands, August 31, 2004 -- Ahold today announced the
appointment of Bart Karis as Senior Vice President General Merchandising,
effective December 1, 2004. Karis, 45, will report directly to Ahold President &
CEO Anders Moberg.

This new position underlines Ahold's commitment to its "Road to Recovery"
program and the re-engineering of its food retail operations. Based at the Group
Support Office in Zaandam, Karis will be responsible for developing and
implementing a general merchandising strategy for the company, from product
development and sourcing to supply chain management.

Bart Karis is a Dutch national who has worked for home furnishings retailer IKEA
for the last 15 years, most recently as Vice President Retail Europe.


Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.5720






                                                 Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                 P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                 The Netherlands
                                                 Phone:  +31 (0)75 659 5720
                                                 Fax:    +31 (0)75 659 8302
http://www.ahold.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 511.50

 511.87

 512.21

 512.60

 512.82

 513.03

 513.38

 513.62

 514.01

 514.29

 514.59

 514.74

 515.19

 515.60

 515.88

 516.21

 516.46

 516.66

 516.86

 517.05

 517.34

 517.63

 517.90

 518.30

 518.56

 518.89

 518.89

 519.13

 519.35

 519.35

 519.40

 1,641,564

 1,645,936

 1,649,957

 1,654,574

 1,657,180

 1,659,669

 1,663,820

 1,666,669

 1,671,301

 1,674,630

 1,678,199

 1,679,984

 1,685,344

 1,690,233

 1,693,575

 1,697,516

 1,700,503

 1,702,895

 1,705,288

 1,707,562

 1,711,035

 1,714,510

 1,717,748

 1,722,549

 1,725,672

 1,729,639

 1,729,639

 1,732,526

 1,735,174

 1,735,174

 1,735,776

STORAGE

+3,542

+4,372

+4,021

+4,617

+2,606

+2,489

+4,151

+2,849

+4,632

+3,329

+3,569

+1,785

+5,360

+4,889

+3,342

+3,941

+2,987

+2,392

+2,393

+2,274

+3,473

+3,475

+3,238

+4,801

+3,123

+3,967

+0

+2,887

+2,648

+0

+602

CHANGE

1,826

2,508

2,020

2,656

1,320

1,233

2,471

976

1,960

1,960

1,964

1,062

2,957

2,936

1,820

2,187

1,780

1,295

1,377

1,381

1,949

1,941

1,940

2,574

1,954

2,424

0

1,930

1,608

161

561

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 26

 41

 104

 114

 117

 112

 110

 109

 115

 130

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-40

-304

+8

-329

-6

+22

-379

+460

+375

-282

-164

-162

-255

-471

-135

-200

-274

-89

-171

-234

-197

-163

-267

-50

-265

-307

+112

-364

-163

-46

-128

OR

 4

 31

 11

 35

 15

 15

 38

 15

 0

 8

 23

 19

 15

 12

 4

 0

 19

 12

 31

 23

 89

 35

 8

 8

 19

 35

 35

 12

 39

 16

 27

C.F.S.

 .01

 .08

 .03

 .09

 .04

 .04

 .10

 .04

 .00

 .02

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .00

 .05

 .03

 .08

 .06

 .23

 .09

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .09

 .09

 .03

 .10

 .04

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .01

 .15

 .03

 .28

 1.12

 .41

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR March 21, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2018 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +97,754 54,731 0 980 0 -4,468 653 1.69 2.50

ACRE-FEET +97,754 108,559 0 1,944 0 -8,862 1,295

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 1,944 TOTAL 1,944

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2017 TO DATE = 3.16

 1,638,022

SPILL 0 2.50

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 3.05
#### § 679.200 What is the purpose of requiring States to identify regions?

The purpose of identifying regions is to align workforce development activities and resources with larger regional economic development areas and available resources to provide coordinated and efficient services to both job seekers and employers.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 794.85

 794.90

 794.95

 794.90

 794.83

 794.85

 794.90

 794.91

 794.94

 794.94

 794.92

 794.92

 794.92

 794.89

 794.85

 794.88

 794.88

 794.87

 794.83

 794.81

 794.78

 794.75

 794.71

 794.67

 794.67

 794.59

 794.57

 794.50

 794.48

 794.45

 9.64

 9.66

 9.69

 9.66

 9.63

 9.64

 9.66

 9.67

 9.68

 9.68

 9.67

 9.67

 9.67

 9.66

 9.64

 9.65

 9.65

 9.65

 9.63

 9.62

 9.61

 9.59

 9.57

 9.55

 9.55

 9.51

 9.50

 9.47

 9.46

 9.45

STORAGE

-1.49

+0.03

+0.02

-0.02

-0.03

+0.01

+0.03

+0.01

+0.01

+0.00

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.02

-0.02

+0.02

+0.00

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

+0.00

-0.04

-0.01

-0.03

-0.01

-0.01

CHANGE

-739

25

24

0

-4

22

31

22

26

18

14

17

17

9

6

27

18

15

8

13

12

10

8

9

19

-1

12

1

13

12

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 11

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

 12

OUTLET

 6

 6

 6

 6

 7

 6

 7

 8

 8

 7

 8

 6

 6

 6

 5

 7

 6

 6

 6

 6

 7

 6

 6

 7

 7

 6

 5

 6

 6

 7

C.F.S.

 .36

 .37

 .40

 .35

 .42

 .41

 .42

 .49

 .51

 .45

 .49

 .41

 .38

 .35

 .33

 .44

 .35

 .40

 .38

 .40

 .44

 .40

 .41

 .47

 .42

 .40

 .34

 .40

 .38

 .44

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 RUN DATE: 08/08/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.67 -336 320 0 192 12.21 .00

ACRE-FEET -1,670 -666 635 0 381

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 635

 635

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2013 10.98

 11.13

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 221.88

 221.36

 221.63

 221.71

 221.48

 221.80

 221.79

 221.82

 221.66

 222.42

 221.53

 221.34

 221.36

 221.49

 222.01

 221.03

 220.88

 220.45

 222.01

 221.61

 222.36

 221.91

 221.64

 221.93

 222.63

 221.55

 221.91

 221.83

 222.75

 223.41

 224.22

 48,071

 46,705

 47,414

 47,625

 47,020

 47,861

 47,835

 47,914

 47,493

 49,501

 47,152

 46,653

 46,705

 47,046

 48,411

 45,839

 45,446

 44,322

 48,411

 47,362

 49,341

 48,150

 47,441

 48,203

 50,060

 47,204

 48,150

 47,940

 50,379

 52,142

 54,320

STORAGE

+1,576

-1,366

+709

+211

-605

+841

-26

+79

-421

+2,008

-2,349

-499

+52

+341

+1,365

-2,572

-393

-1,124

+4,089

-1,049

+1,979

-1,191

-709

+762

+1,857

-2,856

+946

-210

+2,439

+1,763

+2,178

CHANGE

3,223

3,234

3,286

3,323

3,333

2,557

2,371

2,374

2,479

2,446

2,452

3,227

3,305

3,326

3,375

3,390

3,364

3,108

3,348

3,282

3,288

3,302

3,333

3,344

3,284

3,306

3,230

3,363

3,348

3,308

3,266

PUMPING

 507

 1,298

 943

 1,138

 1,347

 1,345

 1,430

 1,545

 1,355

 1,292

 1,312

 988

 938

 1,403

 764

 833

 576

 654

 833

 1,880

 2,826

 2,280

 2,172

 1,648

 1,939

 2,030

 2,012

 1,793

 2,138

 2,007

 1,795

PUMPING

 8,983

 8,963

 8,953

 8,931

 8,901

 7,245

 6,566

 6,488

 6,460

 6,446

 8,715

 8,682

 8,668

 8,612

 8,643

 8,610

 7,113

 6,621

 4,637

 6,542

 3,052

 4,270

 4,407

 4,722

 4,250

 6,100

 4,581

 5,408

 4,130

 4,130

 4,287

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

-197

-415

-209

-225

-271

-167

-258

-180

-151

-87

-286

-249

-134

+34

+245

-152

+136

+103

+191

-150

-31

-136

-94

-22

+98

-218

-34

-209

+68

-37

+137

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY January 31, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2016 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +7,825 97,175 0 204,116 45,021 -2,900

ACRE-FEET +7,825 192,747 0 404,864 89,299

SUMMARY

 124

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 404,864 124

 46,495

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 89,299

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

7,258

6,754

7,178

7,077

6,881

6,625

5,870

5,878

5,274

6,391

6,677

6,440

6,461

6,826

6,476

4,908

3,990

3,497

3,993

4,761

3,618

2,784

2,983

3,433

3,743

3,602

3,874

3,941

4,082

3,755

3,840

 158,870

 315,119

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 494,287

-5,752

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7481
HENRY L. KING, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EARL D. BESHEARS; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-1766-S) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Henry L. King, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. King v. Beshears , No. CA-95-1766-S (D. Md. Aug. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### SUBCHAPTER LII—QUILEUTE AND HOH TRIBES OF WASHINGTON: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
Exhibit
31.1


CERTIFICATIONS





I, Vijay
Suri, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify that:





1.           I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of InferX
Corporation;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)          [this
paragraph has been omitted]





(c)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(d)          Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  May  24,
      2010By:
              /s/ Vijay SuriVijay
      SuriChief
      Executive Officer