alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Flight International 

# Academy

Air Direct Airways

125 Perimeter Rd. Nashua NH

www.flightinternationalacademy.com

www.airdirectairways.com

Jan 1 st 2011



### Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12

- 140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption for deviation from FAR 141.35(e) for Mr. Ken n eth Wyman

We r equest for the exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulation rule 141.35(e) to hire M r

. Kenneth

Wyman as Chief Instructor

. We are seek ing for the deviation from the rule due to the following factors:

Mr. Kenneth Wyman has:

1. 14 years of flying experience with an Airline Transport Pilot Certificate ;

2. W orked as pro f essional pilot for Part 91K and 121 air carriers;

3. S pent 4 years in the Navy as AMS 3 rd class and discharged with honors;

4. He has been an Instructor for 13 years;

5. H as been a Chief Instructor for Keyflight Academy under FAR P art 61. Keyflight Academy

followe d the equivalent of 141 curriculum from which Kenneth benefited from the experien ce;

6. H as trained numerous students and initial CFI candidates with an outstanding pass rate of over

90%.

Other factors:

1. The renowned Daniel Webster College has recently annou nced the closure of their part 141

f light training program.

2. W e believe there is an instant need for another school to step in and offer the course due to

lack of a part 141 flying school in the whole state of New Hampshire;

The specific sections of 14 C.F .R. from which an exemption is sought 

### : FAR Part 141.35(e)

– “ To be

eligible for designation as chief instructor for ground school course, a person must have 1

year of experience as a ground school instruc tor at a certified pilot school”

We believe Ken neth has the right credentials as a professional and person ality in our pursuit to obtain

an approval for the part 141 curriculum. I remain hopeful and look for forward to your prompt response

to our request.

Contact information:



### Ghafoor Siddique

CEO

Fli ght Internationl Academy

125 Perimeter Rd.

Nashua NH 03063

Tel: 603

- 882

- 5606 (Off) 978

- 973

- 8885(Cell)
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Imre EszenyiName:
    
    Imre EszenyiTitle:
    
    Acting President and Chairman(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Paul BiberkrautName:
    
    Paul BiberkrautTitle:
    
    Chief Financial and AdministrativeOfficer (Principal Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 24 , 2014 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Gavin Lau , EPA Region 2/CASD - APB SUBJECT: November 21 , 2014 Meeting Regarding the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards and Proposed C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the organization listed below on November 21, 2014, in San Juan, Puerto Rico, to discuss the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards and Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014 . The Clean Power Plan Supplemental Proposal Notice was proposed on October 28, 2014. **ATTENDEES Interamerican Associati**  **on of Sanitary Engineering**
# ~~~~GY

**.** OHIO May 28, 2015 Mr. Christopher Beekman Ohio EPA- DAPC Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town St., Suite 700 Columbus, Ohio 43215 RE: Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., W.C. Beckjord Station Facility ID No.: 1413100008 Emissions Units: B007, B008, B009, and BOlO DearMr. Beekman: Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. 139E. 4th Streel Cincinnati, OH 45202

This letter is to inform you that, as ofDecember 31, 2014, the four oil-fired emissions units at W.C. Beckjord Station (B007, B008, B009, and BOlO) are permanently shut down and removed from service. Itis the understanding ofDuke Energy Ohio, Inc. that authorization to operate the affected units has ceased as ofDecember 31, 2014 and the permittee shall not be required to meet any Title V permit requirements applicable to these emissions units, except for any residual requirements, such as the quarterly deviation reports and annual compliance certification covering the period during which the emissions units last operated. Please call Andrew Roebel at 513-287-2356 ifyou should have any questions regarding this information. Based on information and beliefformed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that all factual statements in this transmittal are true, accurate and complete to the best ofmy knowledge. Very truly yours,



# 'ff/~ **S~** Mark 

### J. Schmidt Manager- Reg PlantDemo & Retirement
§ 687.190 How do statutory and regulatory waivers apply to National Dislocated Worker Grants? ( a ) For DWGs, utilization of statutory or regulatory waivers is limited to waivers already approved by the Department under sec. 189(i) of WIOA, separate from the DWG process. WIOA sec. 189(i) gives the Department the authority to waive provisions under subtitles A, B, and/or E of WIOA; requirements of DWGs in WIOA subtitle D cannot and will not be waived.
( b ) A grant application must include a description of the approved waiver and request that the waiver be applied to the DWG. The Department will consider such requests as part of the overall DWG application review and decision process; however, applicants may not use this process to request new waivers.
( c ) If during the operation of a DWG, the grantee wishes to utilize a statutory or regulatory waiver that the Department has already approved under sec. 189(i), but it was not included in the grantee's original DWG application, the grantee must submit a grant modification that describes the waiver and requests application of the waiver to the DWG. Grantees may not use this process to request new waivers.
Exhibit 99.1

Annual Statement of
ComplianceProtective Life Secured Trust 2005-14 (the "Trust")

I, Joseph A. Lloret, a duly elected and acting officer of The Bank of New York ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on
behalf of the Indenture Trustee, that:

1.     I
have reviewed and examined the performance by the Indenture Trustee of the
collection and distribution of trust money pursuant to
Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the Indenture
pursuant to which the Trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued during the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2005 (the "Relevant
Year"); and

2.     Based
upon my review and examination described in 1 above, and except as provided in the Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated March 31, 2006, prepared by the Trust's
independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with Section 10 of the Expense and Indemnity
Agreement, to the best of my knowledge, the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to noteholders
pursuant to Section 5.02 and, if applicable, Section 6.06 of the
Indenture was performed in a satisfactory manner in all material respects
throughout the Relevant Year.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK, as Indenture Trustee

|By: |  | /s/JOSEPH A. LLORET
      Name:  Joseph A. Lloret
      Title:    Assistant Vice President |  |  |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  | 

Date:  March 31, 2006
#### Sebastian Sipmeier, Respondent, v. Helva Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Judgment, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and" Shientag, JJ. v
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Fingerhut Companies, Inc. for the fiscal
quarter ended March 27, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-27-1998
<CASH>                                         167,494
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  907,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                   181,101
<INVENTORY>                                    121,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,320,922
<PP&E>                                         492,175
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,699,102
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          608,408
<BONDS>                                        345,187
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           465
<OTHER-SE>                                     677,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,699,102
<SALES>                                        272,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               378,887
<CGS>                                          128,651
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  356,286
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                37,530
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,279
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,308
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,505
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,505
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
#### § 686.900 Are damages caused by the acts or omissions of students eligible for payment under the Federal Tort Claims Act?

Yes, students are considered Federal employees for purposes of the FTCA. (28 U.S.C. 2671 *et seq.*) Claims for such damage must be filed pursuant to the procedures found in 29 CFR part 15, subpart D.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the
Companies) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason W. Bixby, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Companies.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jason W. Bixby     
|Jason W. Bixby         
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 25, 2008
#### Catherine O’Connor, an Infant, by Florence O’Connor, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 194

 196

 200

 204

 204

 203

 205

 203

 205

 199

 200

 198

 195

 186

 180

 177

 190

 176

 175

 158

 164

 154

 150

 158

 154

 137

 136

 136

 135

 133

 130

 136

 140

 140

 143

 144

 144

 140

 135

 144

 148

 139

 137

 122

 126

 123

 132

 132

 137

 112

 113

 95

 100

 91

 99

 100

 109

 110

 113

 114

 115

 114

 176

 177

 181

 186

 187

 185

 182

 180

 184

 180

 179

 179

 171

 167

 163

 164

 162

 161

 151

 145

 132

 126

 120

 122

 123

 126

 128

 130

 127

 125

 123

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Coinage Act of 1834

              														Coinage Act of 1834, June 28, 1834.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1093,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Elizabeth A. Kelly v. Rachel J. Kremm and Others.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present •— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
§ 680.110 When must adults and dislocated workers be registered and considered a participant? ( a ) Registration is the process for collecting information to support a determination of eligibility. This information may be collected through methods that include electronic data transfer, personal interview, or an individual's application. Individuals are considered participants when they have received a Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) service other than self-service or information-only activities and have satisfied all applicable programmatic requirements for the provision of services, such as eligibility determination (*see* § 677.150(a) of this chapter).
( b ) Adults and dislocated workers who receive services funded under WIOA title I other than self-service or information-only activities must be registered and must be a participant.
( c ) EO data, as defined in § 675.300 of this chapter, must be collected on every individual who is interested in being considered for WIOA title I financially assisted aid, benefits, services, or training by a recipient, and who has signified that interest by submitting personal information in response to a request from the grant recipient or designated service provider.
496 P.2d 746

#### Em’ly ATTAWAY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JIM MILLER, INC., d/b/a Paul Thorp Health Spas and Nadine Lovelady, d/b/a Lovelady Realty and Construction Company, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 750.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

April 14, 1972.

*687R. E. Richards, Girand & Richards, Hobbs, for appellant Lovelady.

L. George Schubert, Hobbs, for appellant Miller.

William J. Heck, Hobbs, for appellee.

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Defendants appeal from judgment entered on a jury verdict against them for personal injuries awarded Attaway.

We affirm.

Each defendant raises separate grounds for reversal.

A. LOVELADY

Lovelady contends, (1) the trial court erred in requiring her counsel to make peremptory challenges and challenges for good cause which were made in the hearing of the jury; (2) the trial court erred in requiring her counsel to make his motion to dismiss in the hearing of the jury.

The record does not support Lovelady’s contentions. It is void of any proceedings for which error is claimed. To obtain a review, the record on appeal must show such portions of the proceedings below necessary to raise claimed error on appeal. Section 21-2-1(17) (1), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4). Seinsheimer & Co. v. Jacobson, 24 N.M. 84, 172 P. 1042 (1918); State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Sherman, 82 N.M. 316, 481 P.2d 104 (1971). Since the record does not show that challenges were exercised, or that they were exercised in the hearing of the jury, or that the motion to dismiss in the hearing of the jury was actually heard by the jury, the judgment is affirmed.

B. MILLER

Miller contends “all the evidence” shows the relationship between Miller and Attaway to be that of master-servant and the relationship of Lovelady to Miller was that of an independent contractor. Miller claims he is not responsible for Lovelady’s negligence. We do not have to decide this issue. Independent of Lovelady’s negligence, substantial evidence of negligence on the part of Miller supports the determination of Miller’s liability. The judgment against Miller is affirmed.

At oral argument, Attaway asked that damages for delay be assessed in her favor under Supreme Court Rule 17(3) [§ 21-2-1(17) (3), N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4) ]. However, Attaway did not, thereafter, file a motion with brief in support thereof. Nevertheless, Attaway failed to meet the conditions set forth in Anderson v. Jenkins Construction Company, 83 N.M. 47, 487 P.2d 1352 (Ct.App.1971).

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and HENDLEY, J., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Eva Ercanbrack, Respondent, against Imperial Color Works et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Award for death benefits'arising through the death of an employee from lead poisoning. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Deyo, JJ.
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2008-0981 Directorate Identifier: 2008NM073AD
747-53A2427, R4--- 3/6/08 747-53A2427, R5---10/1/09 747-53A24271N 02--- 5/22/08 747-53A2473, R2 --- 8/28/09 747-53A2473, R1 --- 2/20/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained inthe Supplemental AD Docket


### MAY BEVIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. Sw., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221

### DURING THE HOURS OF: 9a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03f0512008
#### Chas. Lindner *&*Marchesi, Inc., Respondent, v. Joseph Gluck, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
### §1466. Land and personal property title

Title to any land purchased by a tribe or by an individual Indian with loans made from the revolving loan fund may be taken in trust unless the land is located outside the boundaries of a reservation or a tribal consolidation area approved by the Secretary. Title to any land purchased by a tribe or an individual Indian which is outside the boundaries of the reservation or approved consolidation area may be taken in trust if the purchaser was the owner of trust or restricted interests in the land before the purchase, otherwise title shall be taken in the name of the purchasers without any restriction on alienation, control, or use. Title to any personal property purchased with a loan from the revolving loan fund shall be taken in the name of the purchaser.

(Pub. L. 93–262, title I, §106, Apr. 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 78.)
Exhibit 13.1

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each undersigned officer of Anheuser-Busch InBev
SA/NV (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended 31 December 2010 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  |        |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: 12 April 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Carlos Brito
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  | Name:  |  | Carlos Brito           
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  |        |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------- |  | ------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: 12 April 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Felipe Dutra
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  | Name:  |  | Felipe Dutra           
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                  |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer