alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)**

**OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

I, Samir Brikho, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Amec Foster Wheeler plc;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:   14 April 2015 | /s/   SAMIR BRIKHO |
|----------------------------|--------------------|
|                       | Samir   Brikho     |
|                       | Chief Executive    |

 

----
#### William M. Ruyn, appellant, v. John W. McDonald, Sheriff, appellee.

Filed October 22, 1908.

No. 15,561.

Habeas Corpus: Misdemeanor: Defective Complaint. After trial and conviction for an alleged misdemeanor, a prisoner will not be liberated on a writ of habeas corpus because of the insufficiency of the complaint in said criminal proceedings, if by any possible construction of the language employed therein an offense against the law is thereby even defectively stated.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Alexander. C. Troup, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*Frank T. Ransom,*for appellant.

*H. S. Daniel, contra.*

*L. D. Holmes, amions curiae.*

Root, C.

This case presents much the same questions as were discussed in *In re Caldwell, ante,*p. 544. Relator was convicted of an alleged violation of section 241 of the criminal code, and the statement in the complaint is that relator did, in Douglas county, Nebraska, on the 15th day of December, 1907, being the first day of the week, commonly called Sunday, unlawfully engage in common labor, to wit, did sell and offer for sale cigars and newspapers, and negativing the exceptions in said statute. After a trial and conviction, application was made for a writ of habeas corpus, and upon return of the sheriff the writ was denied. In the application for the writ it was alleged that relator was deprived of his liberty contrary to law, and contrary to the constitution of the state of Nebraska, but in none of the assignments of error or in the brief in this court is the claim made that section 241, *supra,*is unconstitutional.

*553Relator’s counsel has filed, an elaborate argument to demonstrate that the acts charged in the complaint do not constitute common labor, and hence defendant was not tried for any offense against the laws of the state. Respondent’s counsel has likewise presented a well-considered brief demonstrating that the aforesaid acts do amount to common labor within the meaning of said section 241. Friends of the court have also volunteered their assistance, and, upon the identical point presented to the police magistrate, and necessarily decided by him, we have been fully advised. We do not think it necessary for us to decide, and we do not determine, whether the decision of the magistrate was erroneous or not, but we do hold, for the reasons set forth in *In re Caldwell,*supra, that said judgment was not absolutely void, but that it is sufficient to repel this collateral attack thereon.

We therefore recommend that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Epperson, Good and Calkins, GO., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Theodore Tsagkaris.,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of Tari Inc.,  for the fiscal  year ended  March 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tari Inc.

Date:  October 12, 2006


                                      /s/  Theodore Tsagkaris
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Theodore Tsagkaris
                                      Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
                                      (Principal Financial Officer and
                                      Principal Accounting Officer)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4548 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to clarify that employees of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe and 

the Congressional–Executive Commission on the People’s Republic of 

China are to be treated as covered employees for purposes of such 

Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 11, 2016 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to 

clarify that employees of the Commission on Security 

and Cooperation in Europe and the Congressional–Executive Commission on the People’s Republic of China are 

to be treated as covered employees for purposes of such 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4548 IH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE OF EMPLOYEES 

2 OF HELSINKI AND CHINA COMMISSIONS 

3 UNDER CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY 

4 ACT OF 1995. 

5 (a) CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE.—Section 101 of 

6 the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 

7 1301) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘Except as otherwise’’ and in9 serting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as otherwise’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section: 

13 ‘‘(b) CLARIFICATION OF COVERAGE OF EMPLOYEES

14 OF CERTAIN COMMISSIONS.— 

15 ‘‘(1) COVERAGE.—With respect to the China 

16 Commission and the Helsinki Commission— 

17 ‘‘(A) any individual who is an employee of 

18 such Commission shall be considered a covered 

19 employee for purposes of this Act; and 

20 ‘‘(B) the Commission shall be considered 

21 an employing office for purposes of this Act. 

22 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—In paragraph (1)— 

23 ‘‘(A) the term ‘China Commission’ means 

24 the Congressional–Executive Commission on the 

25 People’s Republic of China established under 

26 title III of the U.S.–China Relations Act of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4548 IH

1 2000 (Public Law 106–286; 22 U.S.C. 6911 et 

2 seq.); and 

3 ‘‘(B) the term ‘Helsinki Commission’ 

4 means the Commission on Security and Co5 operation in Europe established under the Act 

6 entitled ‘An Act to establish a Commission on 

7 Security and Cooperation in Europe’ (Public 

8 Law 94–304; 22 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.).’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this Act shall take effect as if included in the enactment 

11 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §6561. Abolition of United States International Development Cooperation Agency

#### (a) In general

Except for the components specified in subsection (b), the United States International Development Cooperation Agency (including the Institute for Scientific and Technological Cooperation) is abolished.

#### (b) AID and OPIC exempted

Subsection (a) does not apply to the Agency for International Development or the Overseas Private Investment Corporation.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIV, §1411, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–790.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIV, §1401, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–790, provided that: "This title [see Tables for classification], and the amendments made by this title, shall take effect on the earlier of—

"(1) April 1, 1999; or

"(2) the date of abolition [Apr. 1, 1999] of the United States International Development Cooperation Agency pursuant to the reorganization plan described in section 1601 [22 U.S.C. 6601]."

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation to the United States International Development Finance Corporation and treatment of related references, see sections 9683 and 9686(d) of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,003.64

 1,003.57

 1,003.57

 1,003.62

 1,003.68

 1,003.66

 1,003.50

 1,003.68

 1,003.84

 1,004.39

 1,004.93

 1,005.26

 1,005.42

 1,005.50

 1,005.62

 1,005.75

 1,005.86

 1,005.95

 1,006.18

 1,006.18

 1,006.12

 1,006.15

 1,006.36

 1,006.73

 1,007.28

 1,007.78

 1,008.09

 1,008.31

 1,008.66

 1,009.06

 1,009.28

 2,908.4

 2,906.9

 2,906.9

 2,908.0

 2,909.3

 2,908.9

 2,905.3

 2,909.3

 2,912.9

 2,925.1

 2,937.1

 2,944.5

 2,948.1

 2,949.9

 2,952.5

 2,955.5

 2,957.9

 2,959.9

 2,965.1

 2,965.1

 2,963.7

 2,964.4

 2,969.1

 2,977.5

 2,989.9

 3,001.2

 3,008.2

 3,013.2

 3,021.2

 3,030.3

 3,035.3

STORAGE

-2.4

-1.6

+0.0

+1.1

+1.3

-0.4

-3.5

+4.0

+3.5

+12.2

+12.0

+7.4

+3.6

+1.8

+2.7

+2.9

+2.5

+2.0

+5.2

+0.0

-1.4

+0.7

+4.7

+8.3

+12.4

+11.3

+7.0

+5.0

+8.0

+9.1

+5.0

CHANGE

 3,682

 3,991

 4,553

 4,655

 4,729

 3,804

 2,337

 6,448

 6,110

 9,758

 9,313

 6,797

 4,930

 5,539

 5,153

 5,146

 5,533

 4,892

 5,636

 4,425

 3,314

 4,320

 5,675

 6,814

 8,179

 7,917

 5,130

 4,137

 6,299

 6,186

 5,096

INFLOW

 4,832

 4,674

 4,494

 4,058

 4,007

 3,975

 4,064

 4,354

 4,233

 3,464

 3,127

 3,039

 3,086

 4,629

 3,766

 3,620

 4,246

 3,798

 2,984

 4,385

 3,988

 3,967

 3,240

 2,498

 1,917

 2,189

 1,583

 1,556

 2,287

 1,551

 2,487

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 78

 98

 59

 39

 52

 52

 59

 85

 91

 131

 125

 39

 39

 7

 33

 59

 46

 79

 46

 40

 7

 13

 53

 119

 7

 27

 7

 60

 0

 47

 74

C.F.S.

 .12

 .15

 .09

 .06

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .13

 .14

 .20

 .19

 .06

 .06

 .01

 .05

 .09

 .07

 .12

 .07

 .06

 .01

 .02

 .08

 .18

 .01

 .04

 .01

 .09

 .00

 .07

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.04

 .14

 .85

 2.05

 .02

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 2.53

 .15

 1.91

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 9, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +124.4 170,498 106,098 0 0 1,671 2.54 8.79

ACRE-FEET +124,400 338,183 210,445 0 0 3,314

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 210,445

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 210,445

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.79

JULY 1, 2000 21.32

 2,910.9

Table 3
SCWC-18-0000290

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

STATE OF HAWAII,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

LEE Y. MYERS,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-18-0000290; CASE NO. 1DTC-17-055308)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Lee Y. Myers’

application for writ of certiorari filed on July 19, 2019, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, August 27, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-18-0000290

27-AUG-2019

10:48 AM
§ 10010.62 Exceptions to categorical exclusions. The following exceptions apply to individual actions within categorical exclusions (CX). Environmental documents must be prepared for actions which may: ( a ) Have significant adverse effects on public health or safety.
( b ) Have adverse effects on such unique geographic characteristics as historic or cultural resources, parks, recreation or refuge lands, wilderness areas, wild or scenic rivers, sole or principal drinking water aquifers, prime farmlands, wetlands, floodplains, or ecologically significant or critical areas, including those listed on the Department of the Interior's National Register of Natural Landmarks.
( c ) Have highly controversial environmental effects.
( d ) Have highly uncertain and potentially significant environmental effects or involve unique or unknown environmental risks.
( e ) Establish a precedent for future action or represent a decision in principle about future actions with potentially significant environmental effects.
( f ) Be directly related to other actions with individually insignificant but cumulatively significant environmental effects.
( g ) Have adverse effects on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.
( h ) Have adverse effects on species listed or proposed to be listed on the List of Endangered or Threatened Species, or have adverse effects on designated Critical Habitat for these species.
( i ) Require compliance with Executive Order 12988 (Floodplain Management), Executive Order 11990 (Protection of Wetlands), or the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. However, an action may be categorically excluded following applicable reviews if the action is found to be in conformance with the applicable law or executive order.
( j ) Threaten to violate a Federal, State, local or tribal law or requirement imposed for the protection of the environment.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4420 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4420

  To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide that certain 
convicted felons shall be ineligible to participate in the supplemental 
                     nutrition assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2016

  Mr. Poliquin (for himself and Mr. Jordan) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to provide that certain 
convicted felons shall be ineligible to participate in the supplemental 
                     nutrition assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Welfare for Terrorists Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION OF CERTAIN CONVICTED FELONS.

    Section 6(r)(1)(A) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
2015(r)(1)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (iv) by striking ``or'' at the end,
            (2) in clause (v) by striking ``and'' at the end and 
        inserting ``or'', and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(vi) an offense under chapter 113B of 
                        title 18 of the United States Code; and''.
                                 <all>
```
**OFFICE OF**  **THE AlTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

**“““ =z** 

Dear slrr

1040, raqalertr a legal l rtion oi whether laae lr authorized to raon prior to the lxCivil **Statute8** of Tou8, 8ot.s **dare** rhoreby an emplopmnt Neither thlr **rtatut8** nor any itle 83, of the statutes of r or sala of the llc8nm ,atter

Various requlremants and 0r veriricatisn
Ut8S, provides:

‘.-AII~’ gsrson who aball snesge in the business 3f an e&dopent agent, or rho shall conduct bn crmployment **crrlce,** rlthout tire procuring a llcensa se re**uired and**  **roridrd ror**  **in** this e!mpter my be ‘sined #ziixdny 2ursulns suoh businam or ooouion.

. . . * (Eznhasis curs)fjonorable Joe Zunschik, Faga 2

Artlolr 1566 of thr 9onal Coda likewise9rcvIdes in part8 -Whoerer engages in the business of an anploymoat sgsnt or oonducts anl mploymat offloewithcut first proowIng 8 lIoans~ theretor, 88 rswired bz &I, shall br flnrd. . . ." (Em9has18ours) As a 6,meral rule, in ths l bsenoo oi sgrolfio statutory authorltatloa,a liornsr 18 a **mare** personalprlvIle~gr whloh uy not **bo** assigned. 27 **Tex,** Jur. 9. 905, 6 59; 17 Bullag 12880 Law, 9. **475;** if0118 V. Stat., 1E CrIm. A99. 417.

The Zmaployment

Agenoy Law of Texas **does** act authoriza the **transfer** or ea.10 or tha license issued In acoordanos with its prorlslons; there I# oiery reason to bOll8Ve from **a study**  of this law that thr La6islaturr intrndod, and so proridsd, that a parson oould raoeltr an employments$ono~ ll**oense oalr**  **In** the **mannor sot**  **out in**  Artlols 5210.

It is, theroiore,the 09laion of this Lmpartxmztt that an emplopasata6moy **lloenss, aitsr**  **bslng issued**  to a spsolfisdlndlridual, mar not **bs** transferrodor sold by suoh lndlridusl**to** anotherperson prior to the ex9lratlOn **date** oi the liornss; in other words, the llosnse Is non-trsnsrerable. Yours rrry truly **ATTORNEY**

QENERAL CF TEXA::
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C.ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of RF Industries,  Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2002, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Howard F. Hill,  Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Howard F. Hill
   -----------------------
    Howard F. Hill
    Chief Executive Officer
    September 16, 2002
### §312. Detail of Army, Navy, and Air Force officers

The Secretary of Defense, upon request of the Secretary, is authorized to make temporary details to the Federal Highway Administration of officers of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force, without additional compensation, for technical advice and for consultation regarding highway needs for the national defense. Travel and subsistence expenses of officers so detailed shall be paid from appropriations available to the Department of Transportation on the same basis as authorized by law and by regulations of the Department of Defense for such officers.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 915; Pub. L. 93–87, title I, §152(5), (6), Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 276.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Pub. L. 93–87 substituted "Federal Highway Administration" for "Bureau of Public Roads" and "Department of Transportation" for "Department of Commerce".
### http://www.ebio.org/statistics.php?id=4

EU Member State 20082007200620052004



### Austria 89 15 Belgium 51 

### Czech Republic 76 33 15

Finland 50 13 3 

### France 950 539293 144 101 Germany 581 394 431 165 25 

### Hungary 150 30 34 35 Ireland 10 7 

### Italy 60 60 128 8 Latvia 15 18 12 12 12 

### Lithuania 21 20 18 8 Netherland
s 9 14 15 8 14



### Poland 200 155 120 64 48 Slovakia 94 30 

### Spain 346 348402 303254 Sweden 78 120 140 153 71 

### UK 75 20 Total 2855 1803 1608 913 528



### 2227 0.780035
### **CHAPTER 33—NATIONAL INDIAN FOREST RESOURCES MANAGEMENT**

Sec.
3101.
Findings.
3102.
Purposes.
3103.
Definitions.
3104.
Management of Indian forest land.
3105.
Forest management deduction.
3106.
Forest trespass.
3107.
Direct payment of forest products receipts.
3108.
Secretarial recognition of tribal laws.
3109.
Indian forest land assistance account.
3110.
Tribal forestry programs.
3111.
Assessment of Indian forest land and management programs.
3112.
Alaska Native technical assistance program.
3113.
Establishment of Indian and Alaska Native forestry education assistance.
3114.
Postgraduation recruitment, education and training programs.
3115.
Cooperative agreement between Department of the Interior and Indian tribes.
3115a.
Tribal forest assets protection.
3115b.
Tribal forest management demonstration project.
3116.
Obligated service; breach of contract.
3117.
Authorization of appropriations.
3118.
Regulations.
3119.
Severability.
3120.
Trust responsibility.
(No. 6276

#### United Travel Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Various Agencies, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 10, 1972.*

United Travel Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.