alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1784.5-3 Records. ( a ) Detailed records shall be kept of each meeting of an advisory committee and any subcommittees that may be formed. These records shall include as a minimum— ( 1 ) The time and place of the meeting;
( 2 ) Copies of the Federal Register and other public notices announcing the meeting;
( 3 ) A list of advisors and Department or Bureau employees present;
( 4 ) A list of members of the public present and who each represented;
( 5 ) The meeting agenda;
( 6 ) A complete and accurate summary description of matters discussed and conclusions reached;
( 7 ) A list of recommendations made by the advisory committee;
( 8 ) Copies of all reports received, issued, or approved by the Committee or subcommittee; and
( 9 ) A description of the nature of public participation. The Chairperson of the advisory committee shall certify to the accuracy of meeting records.
( b ) All records, reports, transcripts, minutes, recommendations, studies, working papers, and other documents prepared by or submitted to an advisory committee shall be available for public inspection and copying in the Bureau of Land Management office responsible for support of that committee. Upon request, copies shall be provided at the cost of duplication as established by the regulations in 43 CFR part 2 (Appendix A).
### §176. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(c), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3379

Section, acts Mar. 6, 1920, ch. 94, 41 Stat. 513; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §11(a), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2422, 54 Stat. 1236; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §5, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Oct. 17, 1979, Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), 93 Stat. 695, related to disposition of articles made by patients of Saint Elizabeths Hospital.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geomorphology of the Shenandoah Valley, Virginia and West 
Virginia, and origin of the residual ore deposits

#### Professional Paper 484

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (12965 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (5064 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (4262 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (1131 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp484 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:56
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the
purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc. (UCI), that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of UCI on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has
been provided to UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|               |  |  |  |  |  |                            |  |                                                                           
|-------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|               |  |  | 
|March 12, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ D. Michael Stout, M.D.
|               |  |  |  |  |  |                            |  | D. Michael Stout, M.D. President and Chief Executive Officer              
|               |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph A. Boyle., CPA 
|               |  |  |  |  |  |                            |  | Joseph A. Boyle., CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1

ADMINISTRATOR COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



|                                                                                                                                      |  |                                                                                                                                             
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|CIT Education Loan Trust 2005-1 c/o Chase Bank USA,
National Association 500 Stanton Christiana Road, FL3/OPS4 Newark, Delaware 19713 |  | The Bank of New York, as Eligible Lender Trustee c/o
The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. 10161 Centurion Parkway Jacksonville, FL 32256

The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee

c/o BNY Midwest Trust Company

2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020

|Chicago, | IL 60602
|-------- | --------

Pursuant to Section 16 of the
Administration Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005 (the Administration Agreement) between CIT Education Loan Trust 2005-1 and Education Lending Services, Inc. (the Administrator), the undersigned hereby certifies that
(i) a review of the activities of the Administrator for the period from June 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 has been made under the supervision of the undersigned and (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Administration Agreement throughout such period.



|               |  |                                 
|-------------- |  | --------------------------------
|March 28, 2006 |  | /s/ Perry D. Moore              
|               |  | Perry D. Moore                  
|               |  | Executive V.P. and CFO          
|               |  | Education Lending Services, Inc.
#### Tillie Horenstein, Respondent, v. Max Schein and Others, Defendants, Impleaded with David Zibuloff, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgement and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Charlie Warlick, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58143;

First District (2nd Division) —

July 10, 1973.

Lawrence S. Bloom, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Mariana Twist, and Nicholas P. Iavarone, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

DOWNING, J., took no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  9
<CIK> 0000737210
<NAME> LNB BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          20,842
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             161
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,383
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         100,677
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           101,402
<LOANS>                                        331,844
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 496,779
<DEPOSITS>                                     422,103
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,930
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,226
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,095
<COMMON>                                         4,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 496,779
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,762
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,925
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    63
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,750
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,480
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,458
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           16,292 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      375
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,288
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,780
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,780
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.08
<LOANS-NON>                                        882
<LOANS-PAST>                                       919
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,019
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,116
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      312
<RECOVERIES>                                       126
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,305
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,120
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,185



</TABLE>
TS-ASLT40/50 

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a 

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites 

Controlled by Others 
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Manufacture and Processing
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ACORN HOLDING CORP. FOR THE SECOND QUARTER ENDED JUNE 
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000737243
<NAME>                    ACORN HOLDING CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         421,856
<SECURITIES>                                   1,260,884
<RECEIVABLES>                                  469,703
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,360,814
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,918,904
<PP&E>                                         2,063,706
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,241,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,843,615
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,583,511
<BONDS>                                        0      
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0      
<PREFERRED>                                    0      
<COMMON>                                       55,389
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,023,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,843,615
<SALES>                                        4,197,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,197,009
<CGS>                                          2,945,601
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,874,977
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (18,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,919 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                338,113
<INCOME-TAX>                                   63,110
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            275,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0      
<NET-INCOME>                                   275,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.063  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.063      
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4187

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MITCHELL GATEWOOD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-96-177) Submitted: November 21, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2004 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard A. Culler, CULLER & CULLER, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jennifer Marie Hoefling, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mitchell Gatewood appeals from the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing an eleven-month prison term. Gatewood’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there were no meritorious grounds for appeal but raising two issues: (1) whether the district judge failed to consider the availability of substance abuse treatment programs before revoking Gatewood’s supervised release; and (2) whether the imposition of an eleven-month sentence was unreasonable. Gatewood was advised of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has declined to do so. We have reviewed the record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Gatewood’s supervised release and imposing an eleven-month sentence. SeeUnited States v. Davis , 53 F.3d 638, 642 (4th Cir. 1995) (providing standard of review). In accordance with the requirements of Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Gatewood’s supervised release and eleven-month sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be- 3 - frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Abraham Hoch, Respondent, v. Samuel Chester, Appellant.

Order modified by inserting therein a recital that the grounds of the injunction are that it appears by affidavits that defendant during the pendency of *908the action is doing or procuring, or suffering to be done, or threatens or is about to do or procure or suffer to be done, an act in violation of plaintiff’s rights respecting the subject of the action, and tending to render the judgment ineffectual; and as so modified the said order is affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 825.43

 825.43

 825.42

 825.43

 825.44

 825.43

 825.43

 825.49

 825.73

 826.00

 826.15

 826.21

 826.25

 826.28

 826.29

 826.36

 826.44

 826.54

 826.54

 826.60

 826.64

 826.66

 826.68

 826.69

 826.72

 826.75

 826.75

 826.77

 826.80

 826.94

 32.38

 32.38

 32.37

 32.38

 32.39

 32.38

 32.38

 32.44

 32.68

 32.96

 33.11

 33.18

 33.22

 33.25

 33.26

 33.33

 33.41

 33.52

 33.52

 33.58

 33.62

 33.64

 33.66

 33.67

 33.70

 33.73

 33.73

 33.75

 33.79

 33.93

STORAGE

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

+0.01

+0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.06

+0.24

+0.28

+0.16

+0.06

+0.04

+0.03

+0.01

+0.07

+0.08

+0.10

+0.00

+0.06

+0.04

+0.02

+0.02

+0.01

+0.03

+0.03

+0.00

+0.02

+0.03

+0.15

CHANGE

21

27

22

32

31

21

31

57

148

164

105

58

48

42

30

62

68

78

26

57

48

36

38

31

42

42

26

36

41

98

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 6

 1

 0

 0

 2

 2

 2

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .17

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .02

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .01

 .00

INCHES

 .06

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .42

 .88

 .24

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .80

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 RUN DATE: 03/11/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.53 1,566 0 750 38 1.07 2.86

ACRE-FEET +1,530 3,106 0 1,488 75

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,488

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 1,488

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.86

JULY 1, 2003 3.54

 32.39

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### International Patent Co., Limited, v. Eric W. Eweson.

Present—Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 169

 174

 177

 185

 188

 191

 194

 202

 202

 205

 211

 217

 218

 220

 220

 219

 218

 218

 221

 221

 222

 220

 224

 222

 223

 225

 223

 223

 223

 224

 223

 134

 140

 149

 158

 168

 169

 178

 177

 184

 186

 187

 188

 191

 189

 189

 188

 192

 190

 189

 188

 190

 188

 190

 190

 188

 188

 181

 178

 179

 178

 186

 152

 159

 165

 173

 179

 181

 187

 192

 196

 199

 202

 208

 210

 210

 207

 208

 208

 206

 206

 207

 208

 209

 211

 210

 211

 213

 208

 208

 208

 210

 212

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 15, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 669.310 What are the basic components of an NFJP service delivery strategy? The NFJP service delivery strategy must include: ( a ) A customer-centered case management approach;
( b ) The provision of workforce investment activities, which include core services, intensive services, and training services, as described in WIA section 134, as appropriate;
( c ) The arrangements under the MOU's with the applicable Local Workforce Investment Boards for the delivery of the services available through the One-Stop system to MSFW's; and
( d ) Related assistance services.