alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.21 Emergency restorations. ( a ) *Reporting requirements and definition.* ( 1 ) In the event of a natural resource emergency, the natural resource trustee shall contact the National Response Center (800/424-8802) to report the actual or threatened discharge or release and to request that an immediate response action be taken.
( 2 ) An emergency is any situation related to a discharge or release requiring immediate action to avoid an irreversible loss of natural resources or to prevent or reduce any continuing danger to natural resources, or a situation in which there is a similar need for emergency action.
( b ) *Emergency actions.* If no immediate response actions are taken at the site of the discharge or release by the EPA or the U.S. Coast Guard within the time that the natural resource trustee determines is reasonably necessary, or if such actions are insufficient, the natural resource trustee should exercise any existing authority he may have to take on-site response actions. The natural resource trustee shall determine whether the potentially responsible party, if his identity is known, is taking or will take any response action. If no on-site response actions are taken, the natural resource trustee may undertake limited off-site restoration action consistent with its existing authority to the extent necessary to prevent or reduce the immediate migration of the oil or hazardous substance onto or into the resource for which the Federal or State agency or Indian tribe may assert trusteeship.
( c ) *Limitations on emergency actions.* The natural resource trustee may undertake only those actions necessary to abate the emergency situation, consistent with its existing authority. The normal procedures provided in this part must be followed before any additional restoration actions other than those necessary to abate the emergency situation are undertaken. The burden of proving that emergency restoration was required and that restoration costs were reasonable and necessary based on information available at the time rests with the natural resource trustee.
[51 FR 27725, Aug. 1, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 5173, Feb. 22, 1988]
§ 725.225 Determination of dependency; parent, brother, or sister. An individual who is the miner's parent, brother, or sister will be determined to have been dependent on the miner if, during the 1-year period immediately prior to the miner's death: ( a ) The individual and the miner were living in the same household (see § 725.232); and
( b ) The individual was totally dependent on the miner for support (see § 725.233(h)).
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 28, 2007, the Form 20-F/A filed on July 6, 2007 and this Form 20-F/A of
e-Future Information Technology Inc. (the Company) (the Report), I, Yu Ping, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                        
|----------------- |  | -----------------------
|November 21, 2007 |  | /s/ Yu Ping            
|                  |  | Yu Ping                
|                  |  | Chief Financial Officer
### §1300e–6. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–557, §7, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1172, which related to exemption of funds distributed per capita under the provisions of this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes and payments to minors and persons under legal disability, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report  of  Liberator BDC, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,  2007  as  filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I,  Edward J. Wegel,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ Edward J. Wegel
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Edward J. Wegel
                                           Principal Financial Officer
                                           March 28, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4634 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4634

   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP Code for Eastvale, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2016

 Mr. Calvert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the United States Postal Service to designate a single, 
               unique ZIP Code for Eastvale, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE, UNIQUE ZIP CODE FOR EASTVALE, CALIFORNIA.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
section, the United States Postal Service shall designate a single, 
unique ZIP Code applicable to the area encompassing only Eastvale, 
California.
                                 <all>
```
#### Lillian B. Bragg, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Central New England Railway Company, Appellant.

Motion dismissed. Under the provisions of the Judiciary Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 30 [Laws of 1909, chap. SB], § 3, subd. 3) the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is constituted a court of record, as is also the Supreme Court by subdivision 4. The justice who granted the order to show cause in this case is not a member of this court, and had no power to grant the same. Present— Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### SUBCHAPTER V—BATTLE MOUNTAIN SANITARIUM RESERVE
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Christine West, Chief Financial Officer of Portal Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 3, 2007



/s/  Christine West

Christine West,

Chief Financial Officer













#
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.99

 130.89

 130.93

 130.94

 130.96

 131.03

 130.94

 130.95

 131.00

 130.95

 130.95

 130.93

 130.92

 130.88

 131.03

 130.93

 130.85

 130.93

 130.91

 130.84

 130.92

 130.92

 130.86

 130.87

 130.89

 130.89

 130.92

 130.90

 130.76

 130.83

 130.99

 689

 677

 682

 683

 685

 694

 683

 684

 690

 684

 684

 682

 680

 676

 694

 682

 673

 682

 679

 671

 680

 680

 674

 675

 677

 677

 680

 678

 663

 670

 689

STORAGE

+4

-12

+5

+1

+2

+9

-11

+1

+6

-6

+0

-2

-2

-4

+18

-12

-9

+9

-3

-8

+9

+0

-6

+1

+2

+0

+3

-2

-15

+7

+19

CHANGE

837

849

775

754

757

763

738

752

757

738

767

777

783

778

798

784

755

758

743

713

688

655

643

618

616

639

632

610

634

661

655

INFLOW

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 62

 54

 52

 50

 49

 49

 48

 47

 47

 46

 45

 45

 46

 47

 47

 47

 47

PUTAH

 764

 784

 701

 682

 684

 686

 673

 680

 683

 670

 695

 707

 713

 709

 725

 734

 707

 702

 695

 667

 634

 607

 598

 570

 569

 593

 582

 563

 594

 609

 597

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .34

 .38

 .30

 .33

 .42

 .41

 .38

 .28

 .33

 .41

 .42

 .40

 .39

 .31

 .45

 .46

 .38

 .40

 .35

 .39

 .27

 .34

 .33

 .32

 .36

 .37

 .44

 .39

 .34

 .35

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 RUN DATE: 08/06/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4 22,427 20,577 1,808 37 11.45 .00

ACRE-FEET +4 44,484 40,814 3,586 73

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,586

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 40,814

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2014 .00

 685

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
press release                                                                UPC

UNITED PAN EUROPE COMMUNICATIONS N.V. ANNOUNCES SIX MONTH WAIVER EXTENSION FROM
SENIOR LENDERS

Amsterdam, The Netherlands - April 9, 2003: United Pan-Europe Communications
N.V. ("UPC") (EURONEXT Amsterdam: UPC), one of the leading broadband
communications companies in Europe, today announces that, as expected, bank
lenders have extended until September 30, 2003 the waivers of the defaults
arising as a result of UPC's decision not to make interest payments under its
outstanding Senior Notes. This will allow UPC sufficient time to complete its
restructuring process and to deal with the appeal procedure that has been filed
by InterComm Holdings L.L.C. in relation to the decision of the Amsterdam court
of March 13, 2003, ratifying the Akkoord.

The terms of the waivers remain broadly unchanged from those announced on
September 30, 2002. UPC has completed the transfer of certain head office
activities into the bank group (entities within UPC Distribution that are
borrowers under the bank facility) as contemplated in the bank waiver that was
given on September 30, 2002. In addition, as highlighted on March 5, 2003
following the confirmation order signed by the US court, UPC confirms that 6
million shares of SBS Broadcasting S.A have today been sold to UGC for EUR 100
million.

United  Pan-Europe   Communications   N.V.  is  one  of  the  leading  broadband
communications  and  entertainment  companies in Europe.  Through its  broadband
networks,  UPC provides television,  Internet access,  telephony and programming
services.  UPC's shares are traded on Euronext  Amsterdam  Exchange (UPC) and in
the  United  States  on the Over The  Counter  Bulletin  Board  (UPCOY).  UPC is
majority owned by UnitedGlobalCom, Inc. (NASDAQ: UCOMA).


For further information, please contact:

Claire Appleby                                 Bert Holtkamp
UPC Investor Relations                         UPC Corporate Communications
+ 44 (0) 207 647 8233                          + 31 (0) 20 778 9447
Email: ir@upccorp.com                          Email: corpcomms@upccorp.com

Lazard                                         Citigate First Financial
Daniel Bordessa                                Martha van Dijk
+ 44 (0) 20 7588 2721                          + 31 (0) 20 575 4010
                                               Citigate Dewe Rogerson

                                               Toby Moore
                                               + 44 (0) 20 7638 9571


Also, please visit www.upccorp.com for further information about UPC.
#### In the Matter of Holmes Jones, an Attorney.

*Attorney disbarred.*

Charges of professional misconduct against the respondent, an attorney and counselor at law, presented by the Association of the Bar of the City of Hew York.

*881Ingraham, P. J.:

The charges against this respondent involve his misappropriation of property and money of his clients, which he converted to his own use and failed to pay over until proceedings had been commenced by his clients against him, orders had been made that he restore to his clients the money he had misappropriated, and commitments had been ordered for contempt for refusing to obey the orders of the court. When the charges were presented the respondent interposed an answer, and they were referred to the official referee. Instead of appearing before the official referee, the respondent attempted to avoid the investigation by charging that the official referee, being a member of the Association of the Bar of the City of Hew York, was disqualified from acting. That objection having been overruled (See 159 App. Div. 782), the respondent failed to appear before the official referee. The official referee took the evidence of the charges and they were proved by uncontradicted evidence. The order of the court requiring the respondent to restore to his clients property that he had misappropriated, and the commitments for contempt for refusing to obey its orders, were proved before the official referee, and he has reported that the charges were all proved. When the proceedings came on for final order upon the report of the official referee, the respondent again charged that four members of this court, having been members of the Association of the Bar of the City of Hew York before their election to the bench, were disqualified from hearing the charges against the respondent. That objection having been overruled, and the respondent having been given time to file briefs in opposition to the report of the official referee, of which he has failed to avail himself, the proceeding is now presented for final disposition. The official referee in his report has fully set out the charges and the evidence to sustain them. They are all conclusively proved. We adopt the report of the official referee. The conduct of the respondent, both in his treatment of his clients, which is detailed in the report of the official referee, and in this proceeding, when called to account, has demonstrated his unfitness to remain a member of the profession and he is, therefore, disbarred. Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred. Respondent disbarred. Order to be settled on notice.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**I, Stanislas Vilgrain, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 26, 2006      /s/ Stanislas Vilgrain Stanislas Vilgrain  Chief Executive Officer  
24
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Unitech Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB,  as amended,  for the period ended  October 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
James  Durward,  in my capacity as Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 30, 2005                            /s/ James Durward
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    James Durward
                                                    Principal Executive Officer
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                June 14, 2006 | /s/                Howard F.                Hill                                                             Howard                F. HillChief                Executive Officer |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 422.822 Notification of intent to collect by administrative offset. ( a ) Prior to initiation of collection by Administrative Offset, we will: ( 1 ) Send the debtor a notice by mail or hand-delivery. The notice will include the type and amount of the debt, the intention of the agency using internal offset or non-centralized Administrative Offset to collect the debt 30 days after the date of the notice, and the name of the Federal agency from which the creditor agency wishes to collect in the case of a non-centralized Administrative Offset. Additionally, if the debt is not satisfied by offset within the Social Security Administration or by agreement with another Federal agency, the notice will include the intent to refer the debt to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) for collection through centralized Administrative Offset, including offset of tax refunds 60 days after the date of the notice as well as an explanation of the debtor's rights under 31 U.S.C. 3716.
( 2 ) Give the debtor the opportunity: ( i ) To make a voluntary payment;
( ii ) To review and copy agency records related to the debt;
( iii ) For a review within the agency of the determination of indebtedness;
( iv ) To make a written agreement to repay the debt.
( b ) The procedures set forth in paragraph (a) of this section are not required when: ( 1 ) The offset is in the nature of a recoupment;
( 2 ) The debt arises under a contract subject to the Contracts Disputes Act or Federal Acquisition Regulations;
( 3 ) In the case of a non-centralized Administrative Offset (see § 422.824), the agency first learns of the existence of the amount owed by the debtor when there is insufficient time before payment would be made to the debtor/payee to allow for prior notice and an opportunity for review. When prior notice and an opportunity for review are omitted, we will give the debtor such notice and an opportunity for review as soon as practicable and will promptly refund any money ultimately found not to have been owed to the agency; or
( 4 ) The agency previously has given a debtor any of the notice and review opportunities required under this part, with respect to a particular debt. Subsequently, any interest accrued or any installments coming due after we initiate an offset would not require a new notice and opportunity to review.
( c ) The notice will be included as part of a demand letter issued under § 422.805 to advise the debtor of all debt collection possibilities that the agency will seek to employ.