alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of RF Industries, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Howard F. Hill, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:   March 17, 2006                           /s/ Howard F. Hill
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Howard F. Hill
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to RF Industries, Ltd. and will be
retained by RF Industries, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



                                       22
#### Ada Samuels, Appellant, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals or for reargument denied, with $10 costs. Motion for a stay granted pending the granting, or final refusal, by the Court of Appeals of leave to appeal, upon appellant’s filing the undertaking prescribed by section 593 of the Civil Practice Act. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Callahan and Van Yoorhis, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 844.]
# C_2016468EN.01028401.xml

| 15.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 468/284 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 468/284

---

P7_TA(2013)0563

Appointment of a member of the Court of Auditors (Danièle Lamarque — FR)

European Parliament decision of 11 December 2013 on the nomination of Danièle Lamarque as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0311/2013 — 2013/0809(NLE))

(Consultation)

(2016/C 468/64)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0311/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0311/2013),

| — | having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0437/2013), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0437/2013),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 7 November 2013 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 7 November 2013 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Danièle Lamarque as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Danièle Lamarque as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
#### § 726.213 Reports by carriers concerning the payment of benefits.

Pursuant to 33 U.S.C. 914(c) as incorporated by section 422(a) of part C of title IV of the Act and § 726.207 each carrier issuing a policy or contract of insurance under the Act shall upon making the first payment of benefits and upon the suspension of any payment in any case, immediately notify the Office in accordance with a form prescribed by the Office that payment of benefit has begun or has been suspended as the case may be. In addition, each such carrier shall at the request of the Office submit to the Office such additional information concerning policies or contracts of insurance issued to guarantee the payment of benefits under the Act and any benefits paid thereunder, as the Office may from time to time require to carry out its responsibilities under the Act.
#### § 15.5 Wrecks.

No person shall willfully destroy molest, remove, deface, displace, or tamper with any wrecks, parts of wrecks or any cargo pertaining to such wrecks within the Preserve in such manner as to injure or destroy any coral formation.
Motion Granted; Order filed February 2, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-11-00149-CR

____________

MARVIN DWAYNE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1147188

ORDER

On November 29, 2011, this court abated the appeal on appellant’s motion because 

appellant argued he was denied counsel during the thirty-day time period for filing a 

motion for new trial. Appellant has now filed a motion to supplement the record with his 

motion for new trial, the record of the hearing on the motion, and the court’s ruling. 

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on 

or before February 21, 2012, containing appellant’s motion for new trial, the trial court’s 

ruling, and any other supporting documents regarding appellant’s motion for new trial.
2

Janet Ragan, the official court reporter of the 230th District Court, is ordered to file 

a reporter’s record of the hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial. If no record was 

taken, the court reporter should file a document with this court notifying the court that no 

record was taken.

PER CURIAM
(No. 73-CC-443

#### Pfizer, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 2, 1973.*

Pfizer, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
GEORGIA CHAMBER 

CELEB RATING A CENTURY OF LEADERSH IP 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: 

April 20, 2015 

On behalf of businesses of all sizes and across all industry sectors throughout our state, the Georgia 

Chamber oft6mmerce'respectfully urges the U.S. government to take action to remedy unfair 

competitive practices that are hurting our state's economy and threatening jobs here and across the 

country. 

Our focus~ _!o ·enhance Georgia'~ competitiveness by encouraging innovation and maintaining a positive · 

business climate for all our members. The massive subsidies and other unfair benefits being provided by 

the governments of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) fly in the face of our values. Delta Air 

Lines is the largest private employer in Georgia, and the Georgia Chamber of Commerce stands with 

E>elta and other members of the Partnership for Open and Fair Skies on this issue. 

Weweloome the news that'the departmeilts of State-; Commerce and Transportation have opened a 

com~enr peridd to r~v e\N the subsidization of Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline. We 

urge you to formally request consultations with the governments of Qatar and the UAE on this matter, 

and seek a freeze on new capacity from the Gulf carriers to the U.S. while the consultations go forward. 

Fa iF, lnarkeNlfiQen tbmp'etltion is the f0undation of our economy. it's time to take a stand against 

governments that don't play by tM rules' at' the expense of ttiose who do . 

Sincerely, J •••• • I .• \. 

·. ,. It• 

: . 

I } I 

Chris Clark 

Presfdent "and CEO · · · ,. 

Georgia Chamber of Commerce 

s 10-150427-005 . ' 

. . . \ 1.~ I 

'· I' ~' 

(· r 

~ ,. I ,: I 

. ;.,. 

I 

W. Paul Bowus 

2015 Chair 

QuisClark 

President and CEO 

270 Peachtree Street NW. Suite 2200 

Atbnta. ~otgia 30303- 1240 

Phone: 404.223.2264 

Fax: 40'1.223.2290 

www.gachambcr.com
#### Ding Jian ZHENG, Petitioner, v. BUREAU OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, Respondent.

No. 04-4772-AGNAC.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

March 1, 2006.

Theodore Cox, New York, New York, for Petitioner.

John C. Richter, United States Attorney for the Western District of Oklahoma, Kay Sewell, Assistant United States Attorney, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, for Respondent.

PRESENT: Hon. JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Hon. ROBERT D. SACK, and Hon. ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED.

Petitioner Ding Jian Zheng (“Zheng”), through counsel, petitions for review of an order of the BIA affirming the decision of an immigration judge (“IJ”) ordering his removal to China and denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case.

This Court reviews the agency’s factual findings, including adverse credibility determinations, under the substantial evidence standard. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B); *Jin Hui Gao v. United States Att’y Gen.,*400 F.3d 963, 964 (2d Cir.2005); *Zhou Yun Zhang v. INS,*386 *624F.3d 66, 73-79; *Ramsameachire v. Ashcroft,*357 F.3d 169, 178-83 (2d Cir.2004); *Secaida-Rosales v. INS,*331 F.3d 297, 306-13 (2d Cir.2003); *Diallo v. INS,*232 F.3d 279, 286-88 (2d Cir.2000).

In the present case, there was substantial evidence to support the IJ’s credibility determination, including: (1) Zheng’s failure to mention his wife’s alleged forced sterilization, the basis of his persecution claim, in his asylum application; (2) Zheng’s inability to provide specific dates surrounding the sterilization; (3) the absence of any mention of the sterilization or alleged detention in Zheng’s wife’s statement, which Zheng had submitted as corroborative evidence; and (4) Zheng’s demonstrated lack of urgency with respect to his departure from China, given that Zheng claimed that his wife had been forcibly sterilized in 1984, yet Zheng did not come to the United States until, at the earliest, 1992. Taken together, the above points cited by the IJ provide specific, cogent reasons that bear a legitimate nexus to the adverse credibility finding. *See Secaida-Rosales,*331 F.3d at 307. Additionally, the IJ properly denied Zheng’s claim for withholding of removal because he had not met the lower burden required for asylum. *See Zhang v. U.S. INS,*386 F.3d 66, 71 (2d Cir.2004).

For these reasons, the petition for review is DENIED. Having completed our review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay of removal in this petition is DENIED as moot. Any pending request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), and Second Circuit Local Rule 34(d)(1).
D E P AR T M E N T O F T H E AI R F O R C E

HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY (AFFSA)

14 June 2016

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/ARM-100

FROM: HQ AFFSA/XOF

 6500 South MacArthur Blvd

 Building 4, Room 117

 Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 4633 (Regulatory Docket FAA-2002-12189)

1. Title 14 CFR Exemption 4633 was granted to the United States Air Force on 6 Jun 86 and 

was renewed as 4633O on 18 Apr 2014. The exemption expires 30 Sep 2016. Exemption 

4633O relieves USAF aircraft from the provisions of Section 91.215 (b) and (c). 

2. Under this exemption, the USAF conducts military training flight operations in designated 

airspace above 10,000 feet MSL without operating aircraft transponders, subject to provisions 

established by the FAA. The provisions of 4633, as amended in 4633O, will remain a part of 

this renewal, if approved. The requirement for the USAF to conduct these operations remains 

unchanged. Extension of the exemption is essential for USAF aircrews to accomplish 

transponder-off operations and training. These procedures are critical to continuation training 

for wartime scenarios and training operations. The procedures, affected areas, and operations 

constraints outlined in Exemption 4633 (as amended in 2006) have provided invaluable training 

to USAF aircrews. We hereby request an extension IAW Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, 

Part 11. 

2. As operations under this exemption have been safely conducted for the past thirty years, the 

Air Force requests your consideration in approving the renewal of this exemption through 30 Sep 

2019. Please contact me with any questions at (405) 734-6950 or e-mail: hqaffsa.xof@us.af.mil.

MATTHEW J. NIENDORF, Major, USAF

Chief, Flight Standards Division
Exhibit 33.1


                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Jimmy Whang, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            STRATS(SM) Trust For Goldman Sachs Capital I Securities, Series
            2005-1 (the "Trust") and all reports on Form 8-K containing
            distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
            included in the year covered by this annual report of the
            Trust;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
            required to be provided to the Depositor by the Trustee under the
            trust agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in
            these reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Depositor and the Trustee under the trust agreement and based upon
            my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that
            agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Depositor
            and Trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that
            agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
            compliance by the Trustee and the Depositor with the minimum
            servicing or similar standards based upon the report provided by
            an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in
            compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
            Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the trust
            agreement that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank Trust National
Association, as Trustee.

Date: March 30, 2007

/s/ Jimmy Whang
---------------------
Name:   Jimmy Whang
Title:  Director
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.4

                             COMSHARE, INCORPORATED

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
constitutes and appoints Dennis G. Ganster, Kathryn A. Jehle and Michael S.
Khoury, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution, and resubstitution for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign a certain Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to be filed by Comshare, Incorporated relating to the Comshare,
Incorporated Directors' Stock Option Plan and any and all amendments thereto,
and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Dated: 12-14, 1999               /s/ Geoffrey B. Bloom
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Geoffrey B. Bloom, Director
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Roger Stone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 that:



|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  |     |                                                               
|--------------------- |  | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | By: | /s/ROGER STONERoger Stone
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


       CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, John W. Roblin, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    August 13, 2004

/s/ John W. Roblin
--------------------------------------------
Name:    John W. Roblin
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### General geology of Santa Rita quadrangle, Grant County, New 
Mexico

#### Professional Paper 555

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp555 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:54
#### § 1882.0-1 Purpose.

The purpose of this subpart is to establish procedures to be followed in the implementation of a program under section 317 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act to make loans to qualified States and their political subdivisions.