alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 724.06

 724.18

 724.32

 724.44

 724.48

 724.55

 720.51

 720.60

 720.70

 720.80

 720.88

 720.97

 721.03

 721.09

 721.14

 721.17

 721.23

 721.31

 721.37

 721.42

 721.47

 721.52

 721.55

 721.56

 721.57

 721.64

 721.75

 721.89

 722.03

 722.15

 722.22

 1,336

 1,341

 1,346

 1,351

 1,353

 1,355

 1,204

 1,208

 1,211

 1,215

 1,218

 1,221

 1,223

 1,225

 1,227

 1,228

 1,231

 1,233

 1,236

 1,238

 1,239

 1,241

 1,242

 1,243

 1,243

 1,246

 1,250

 1,255

 1,260

 1,265

 1,267

STORAGE

+4

+5

+5

+5

+2

+2

-151

+4

+3

+4

+3

+3

+2

+2

+2

+1

+3

+2

+3

+2

+1

+2

+1

+1

+0

+3

+4

+5

+5

+5

+2

CHANGE

2

3

3

3

1

1

-8

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

2

2

3

3

3

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 68

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2013 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2013

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -65 43 0 68

ACRE-FEET -65 85 0 135

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 135

 135

 1,332

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
#### James H. B. McFerran et al., Respondents, v. Patrick S. Kinney, Appellant.

Kansas City Court of Appeals,

July 6, 1885.

Affirmance. — There being no statement, brief, or assignment of error in the *cause before us*(but of a “ se.eond suit ” not in the record), we affirm the judgment..

Appeal from Caldwell Circuit Court, Hon. James M. Davis, J.

*650
      *Affirmed.*

The facts are sufficiently referred to in the opinion of the court.

Crosby Johnson, for the appellant.

Wm. M. Rush, Jr., for the respondent.

Opinion by

Ellison, J.

The record before ns is for a different action from that of the statement, brief and assignment of errors. We are told by the statement of the appellant, that on August 28,1882, plaintiffs began suit against defendant for the possession of certain lands in the complaint described; that after a trial before the justice of the peace, the case was appealed to the circuit court of Caldwell county and tried at the October term, 1882, thereof, the plaintiffs obtaining judgment. That defendant filed a motion for new trial and in arrest, which were each continued to the February term, 1883. That “onFebruary 3,1883, the petition in this cause was filed before H. W. Markham, J. P., of Caldwell county.” Said “petition” being a complaint of unlawful detainer. That after a change of venue “in this cause ” it was taken to the circuit court by *certiorari ;*that on March 2, 1883, after motions for “new trial and in arrest in the other suit were overruled, the defendant filed in this cause a plea in abatement,” and that a trial was had “in this cause” on the complaint for unlawful detainer; that a judgment was rendered for plaintiffs, and motions for new trial and in arrest being overruled, defendant appeals..

From this statement it appears plaintiffs, after judgment in October for possession and a continuance of the motions for new trial and in arrest, instituted a suit for unlawful detainer, which being taken to the circuit court on certiorari, defendant pleaded the first suit in abate-rent.

From the record before us, all this in regard to a second *651suit and -which, is styled “this cause,” is a myth. There is nothing in regard to a second suit in the record. The record simply shows a trial in October of the suit for possession for non-payment of rent, a judgment for plaintiffs, a continnance of tke motions for new trial and in arrest to the February term, when they were overruled, defendant appealing.

Appellant’s statement, brief and assignment of errors, all pertain to a suit, he says took place in March for unlawful detainer; while the record is in the cause tried in October for possession for non-payment of rent. There being, then, no statement’ brief or assignment of errors in the cause before us, we affirm the judgment, riections 3764, 3773, Revised Statutes, 1879.

All concur.
### §1300b–16. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–429, §7, Jan. 8, 1983, 96 Stat. 2270, which related to provision of Federal Indian services, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**




**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AE Biofuels, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report " ),
      I,
      William J. Maender, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/
                William J. MaenderWilliam
                J. Maender
              Chief
                Financial Officer


Date:
      August 13, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 499.85

 499.37

 499.00

 498.54

 498.08

 497.52

 496.75

 496.24

 495.74

 495.25

 494.75

 494.31

 493.73

 493.17

 492.68

 492.20

 491.86

 491.28

 490.70

 490.13

 489.54

 488.82

 488.14

 487.66

 486.88

 486.13

 485.23

 484.14

 483.13

 482.14

 481.47

 1,505,960

 1,500,459

 1,496,223

 1,490,963

 1,485,709

 1,479,321

 1,470,553

 1,464,755

 1,459,079

 1,453,523

 1,447,861

 1,442,885

 1,436,335

 1,430,020

 1,424,502

 1,419,103

 1,415,284

 1,408,776

 1,402,278

 1,395,902

 1,389,313

 1,381,286

 1,373,720

 1,368,387

 1,359,736

 1,351,436

 1,341,497

 1,329,494

 1,318,404

 1,307,563

 1,300,244

STORAGE

-5,623

-5,501

-4,236

-5,260

-5,254

-6,388

-8,768

-5,798

-5,676

-5,556

-5,662

-4,976

-6,550

-6,315

-5,518

-5,399

-3,819

-6,508

-6,498

-6,376

-6,589

-8,027

-7,566

-5,333

-8,651

-8,300

-9,939

-12,003

-11,090

-10,841

-7,319

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 2,573

 2,571

 1,920

 2,560

 2,373

 3,162

 4,412

 2,824

 2,688

 2,515

 2,511

 2,508

 3,074

 3,140

 2,510

 2,507

 1,883

 3,133

 3,099

 3,086

 3,100

 3,861

 3,700

 2,453

 2,233

 4,069

 4,900

 6,088

 5,468

 5,455

 3,670

POWER

 186

 187

 160

 186

 167

 147

 151

 118

 116

 109

 115

 93

 118

 144

 157

 165

 148

 173

 189

 182

 190

 184

 195

 184

 203

 156

 152

 161

 183

 153

 174

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-76

-16

-55

+94

-109

+88

+142

+20

-58

-176

-229

+92

-109

+100

-115

-49

+105

+25

+12

+54

-32

-2

+81

-51

-1,926

+40

+41

+197

+60

+142

+154

OR

 234

 174

 122

 178

 173

 166

 191

 176

 275

 220

 183

 157

 142

 120

 106

 185

 152

 91

 123

 97

 152

 194

 162

 197

 172

 196

 224

 249

 266

 177

 74

C.F.S.

 .63

 .47

 .33

 .48

 .47

 .45

 .52

 .48

 .75

 .60

 .50

 .43

 .39

 .33

 .29

 .51

 .42

 .25

 .34

 .27

 .42

 .54

 .45

 .55

 .48

 .55

 .63

 .70

 .75

 .50

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR July 2, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2020 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -211,339 0 100,046 4,946 0 -1,556 5,328 14.69 .14

ACRE-FEET -211,339 0 198,441 9,810 0 -3,086 10,568

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 198,441

PACHECO TUNNEL 9,810 TOTAL 208,251

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE = 8.29

 1,511,583

SPILL 0 .14

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 8.29
#### George Swan ARLOW, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants—Appellees.

No. 04-15814.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*250George Swan Arlow, Richmond, CA, pro se.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Former California state prisoner George Swan Arlow appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that he was denied medical care and retaliated against for filing grievances. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim under the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), and we review for abuse of discretion the denial of leave to amend, *Lopez v. Smith,*203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). We affirm.

The district court dismissed Arlow’s original complaint with leave to amend. The court instructed Arlow to set forth his claims concisely and explained what was required to state a claim under the Eighth Amendment.

Arlow then filed an amended complaint that was both lengthy and conclusory. The district court properly dismissed the amended complaint because Arlow failed to allege sufficient facts to demonstrate that any defendants acted with deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs or retaliated against him for filing grievances. Arlow’s conclusory allegations were insufficient. *See Pena v. Gardner,*976 F.2d 469, 471 (9th Cir.1992).

Because the district court had already allowed Arlow an opportunity to cure the deficiencies in his original complaint and had provided specific instructions on appropriate pleading, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion by dismissing Arlow’s amended complaint without granting leave to amend.

Arlow’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 142 124 136

24 144 136 139

25 138 128 134

26 130 119 125

27 125 113 121

28 119 111 116

29 125 107 116

30 114 108 111

COMMENT(S): 0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Staten Island On The South Fork 

Mokelumne River 

Run Date: 5/2/2024
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Tectonic and igneous geology of the northern Shoshone Range, 
Nevada, with sections on gravity in Crescent Valley and economic geology

#### Professional Paper 465

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Study Area



#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp465 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: August 01, 2013 
15:08:05
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

LETONI WILSON, § § No. 446, 2016 Defendant-Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below − Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1507000321 § Plaintiff-Below, § Appellee. §

Submitted: April 12, 2017 Decided: April 26, 2017

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VAUGHN , and SEITZ , Justices.

ORDER

This 26 th day of April 2017, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs

and the record on appeal, we find it evident that t he final judgment of the Superior

Court should be affirmed on the basis of and for th e reasons stated in its July 14,

2016 opinion.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the final judgm ent of the

Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.
Justice
#### James Woods et al., appellants, v. Thomas Garvey, appellee.

Filed December 5, 1908.

No. 15,825.

Intoxicating Liquors: License: Character oe Applicant. One who is frequently under the influence of intoxicating liquors, and who during the preceding year permitted gambling in his place of business, is not a man *o2*respectable character and standing within the meaning of section 7150, Ann. St. 1907, and therefore not entitled to a license permitting him to sell intoxicating liquors.

Appeal from the district court for Colfax county: George H. Thomas, Judge.

*Reversed with, directions.*

*O. J. Phelps,*for appellants.

*W. M. Gain, contra.*

Epperson, C.

The appellee made application to the city board of Schuyler for a liquor license for the municipal year ending May 5, 1909. A remonstrance was filed by the appellants, in which, among other things, it was denied that the applicant was a man of respectable character, and alleged that he is an habitual drunkard, and that he had during the preceding year allowed gambling at his place of business. One witness testified that he had been acquainted with the applicant three or four years, and during that time had seen him under the influence of liquor “a considerable number of times.” This was corroborated by a witness who testified that within the last year he saw the applicant at one time under the influence of liquor, and at another time considered him drunk. This evidence is not sufficient to characterize the applicant as an habitual drunkard, but is sufficient to show that he is uot a man of respectable character and standing, which (lie statute provides that a licensee should be. And one *777of his own witnesses testified upon cross-examination as follows: “Q. You have been in there more or less during the last year? A. Yes, sir; I have. Q. What for? A. I have played cards for cigars, beer or chips. Q. And used the chips to pay for cigars, beer or whiskey? A. Yes, sir. Q. And that has been in the last year? A. Yes, sir.” None of the evidence above quoted or referred to was contradicted or explained by the applicant, and we presume that he knew of the gambling and permitted it. With such evidence remaining unexplained the city council should have denied his application.

We recommend that the judgment of the district court affirming the order of the city council be reversed and this cause be remanded, with instructions to the district court to enter judgment canceling the license.

Duffie and Good,CC., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, this cause is remanded, with instructions to the district court to enter judgment canceling the license.

Reversed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10326]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m., Friday, May 18, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters and a Rule 
Enforcement Review. In the event that the times or dates of these or 
any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with 
the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-10326 Filed 4-25-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2014-0464

Docket Number

2014-SW-002-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

Eurocopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 67A007, Revision 1, dated February 

25, 2009.

Eurocopter ASB No. 67.00.10, Revision 1, dated February 25, 2009.

Eurocopter ASB No. 67.05, Revision 1, dated February 25, 2009.

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and artesian water supply of the Grand Junction 
area, Colorado

#### Professional Paper 451

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp451 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:56
#### Emanuel Bloomfield, by Charles Bloomfield, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Resp*867ondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Rich and Stapleton, JJ.