alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§661 to 672. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 661 to 672, which established the American Mexican Claims Commission in 1942 for the settlement of certain claims, expired pursuant to the provisions of section 661(d), which provided that the authority of the Commission shall terminate at the expiration of four years after the date on which a majority of its members first appointed took office.

Section 661, acts Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §2, 56 Stat. 1058; Apr. 3, 1945, ch. 52, §5, 59 Stat. 50; Oct. 28, 1949, ch. 782, title XI, §1106(a), 63 Stat. 972, established American Mexican Claims Commission, prescribed its composition, provided for compensation of its members, and specified its termination date. Acts Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §2, 56 Stat. 1058; Apr. 3, 1945, ch. 52, §5, 59 Stat. 50, were subsequently repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 651, 652.

Section 662, acts Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §3, 56 Stat. 1058; Mar. 28, 1947, ch. 23, 61 Stat. 24, related to jurisdiction of Commission and to presentation of claims.

Section 663, acts Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §4, 56 Stat. 1059; Apr. 3, 1945, ch. 52, §§4, 7, 59 Stat. 49, 50, related to authority of Commission to examine and render final decisions in those cases where claims were appraised by prior commissions.

Section 664, acts Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §5, 56 Stat. 1060; Apr. 3, 1945, ch. 52, §§1, 2, 59 Stat. 49, related to determination of claims.

Section 665, act Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §6, 56 Stat. 1061, related to determinations made by prior commissions, and to certification by the Secretary of State.

Section 666, act Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §7, 56 Stat. 1061, provided for conversion of appraisals from Mexican to American currency, and for interest on award or appraisal.

Section 667, acts Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §8, 56 Stat. 1061; Apr. 3, 1945, ch. 52, §§3, 6, 59 Stat. 49, 50, created Mexican Claims Fund, provided for appropriations to Fund, and for manner of payments from such Fund.

Section 668, act Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §9, 56 Stat. 1062, provided for payment of awards.

Section 669, act Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §10, 56 Stat. 1062, authorized appropriations for Commission to carry out its functions, and provided for deductions from award or appraisal as reimbursement for expenses incurred by United States.

Section 670, act Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §11(a), 56 Stat. 1063, related to distribution of awards by Special Mexican Claims Commission pursuant to Convention signed Apr. 24, 1943.

Section 671, act Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §12, 56 Stat. 1063, related to claims based on international arbitral awards prior to Convention of 1923.

Section 672, act Dec. 18, 1942, ch. 766, §13, 56 Stat. 1063, defined terms used in sections 661 to 671 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM UNIFORCE'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY  BY ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TYO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         6,555,275
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 46,913,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                     287,917
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              54,081,310
<PP&E>                                         6,944,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,608,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                65,792,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         13,685,124
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             51,228
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                    17,380,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  65,792,009
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             132,953,049
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                125,726,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (9,170)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,829,458
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,406,136
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,126,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,280,136
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,280,136
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.00
        

</TABLE>
§ 625.5 Unemployment caused by a major disaster. ( a ) *Unemployed worker.* The unemployment of an unemployed worker is caused by a major disaster if— ( 1 ) The individual has a “week of unemployment” as defined in § 625.2(w)(1) following the “date the major disaster began” as defined in § 625.2(e), and such unemployment is a direct result of the major disaster; or
( 2 ) The individual is unable to reach the place of employment as a direct result of the major disaster; or
( 3 ) The individual was to commence employment and does not have a job or is unable to reach the job as a direct result of the major disaster; or
( 4 ) The individual has become the breadwinner or major support for a household because the head of the household has died as a direct result of the major disaster; or
( 5 ) The individual cannot work because of an injury caused as a direct result of the major disaster.
( b ) *Unemployed self-employed individual.* The unemployment of an unemployed self-employed individual is caused by a major disaster if— ( 1 ) The individual has a “week of unemployment” as defined in § 625.2(w)(2) following the “date the major disaster began” as defined in § 625.2(e), and such unemployment is a direct result of the major disaster; or
( 2 ) The individual is unable to reach the place where services as a self-employed individual are performed, as a direct result of the major disaster; or
( 3 ) The individual was to commence regular services as a self-employed individual, but does not have a place or is unable to reach the place where the services as a self-employed individual were to be performed, as a direct result of the major disaster; or
( 4 ) The individual cannot perform services as a self-employed individual because of an injury caused as a direct result of the major disaster.
( c ) *Unemployment is a direct result of the major disaster.* For the purposes of paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1) of this section, a worker's or self-employed individual's unemployment is a direct result of the major disaster where the unemployment is an immediate result of the major disaster itself, and not the result of a longer chain of events precipitated or exacerbated by the disaster. Such an individual's unemployment is a direct result of the major disaster if the unemployment resulted from: ( 1 ) The physical damage or destruction of the place of employment;
( 2 ) The physical inaccessibility of the place of employment in the major disaster area due to its closure by or at the request of the federal, state or local government, in immediate response to the disaster; or
( 3 ) Lack of work, or loss of revenues, provided that, prior to the disaster, the employer, or the business in the case of a self-employed individual, received at least a majority of its revenue or income from an entity in the major disaster area that was either damaged or destroyed in the disaster, or an entity in the major disaster area closed by the federal, state or local government in immediate response to the disaster.
[42 FR 46712, Sept. 16, 1977, as amended at 55 FR 555, Jan. 5, 1990; 56 FR 22806, May 16, 1991; 66 FR 56962, Nov. 13, 2001; 68 FR 10937, Mar. 6, 2003]
Exhibit 23




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS





Williamson
Petroleum Consultants, Inc.


303
Veterans Airpark Lane, Suite 1100


Midland,
Texas 79705


432-685-6100





May 14,
2010




Platinum
Energy Resources, Inc.


11490
Westheimer Road, Suite 1000


Houston,
Texas  77077




As oil
and gas consultants, Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc. hereby consents to
the inclusion of information from our report entitled, “Revised Evaluation of
Oil and Gas Reserves to the Interests of Platinum Energy Resources, Inc.
Effective December 31, 2009 for Disclosure to the Securities and Exchange
Commission Williamson Project 0.9395” dated March 30, 2010 and to all references
to our firm in the Registration Statement on Form 10-K of Platinum Energy
Resources, Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about April 15, 2010.




Very
      truly yours,
              
              Williamson
      Petroleum Consultants, Inc./s/
      Williamson Petroleum Consultants, Inc.Midland,
      Texas
§ 802.218 Failure to file papers; order to show cause. ( a ) Failure to file any paper when due pursuant to this part, may, in the discretion of the Board, constitute a waiver of the right to further participation in the proceedings.
( b ) When a petition for review and brief has not been submitted to the Board within the time limitation prescribed by § 802.211, or within an enlarged time limitation granted pursuant to § 802.217, the petitioner shall be ordered to show cause to the Board why his or her appeal should not be dismissed pursuant to § 802.402.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Patrick Kohl, John McDermott and Mary Bangel, Appellants.

*837Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Untermyer, J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the information as to all defendants, and Cohn, J., dissents as to the defendant Rangel, and votes to reverse and dismiss the information as to her on the ground that her guilt was not established beyond a reasonable doubt. Settle order on notice.
#### § 1864.4 Appeals.

An applicant or claimant adversely affected by a written decision of the authorized officer made pursuant to the provisions of this subpart shall have a right of appeal pursuant to 43 CFR part 4.
#### Chase National Bank of the City of New York et al., as Trustees under Six Trusts Made by William E. Kenny, Appellants, v. Raleigh Estates, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Hagarty, Carswell and Lewis, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the following memorandum: The parties treat the matter as one to test the sufficiency of the complaint. I think that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that the matter is *865not a proper subject for a declaratory judgment. The plaintiffs hold a third mortgage upon the real property owned by one of the defendants, and the other defendant holds a second mortgage upon the same premises. The plaintiffs’ mortgage is not in default nor has the security been impaired. The present value of the security and the present equities between the owner of the real estate and the holder of the second mortgage are no concern of the third mortgagee at this time. Hence an action now by the third mortgagee to secure a declaratory judgment fixing and establishing the amount of the principal at present unpaid upon the second mortgage held by the defendant Louray Realty Corporation covering the property owned by the other defendant does not lie. Johnston, J., not voting.
### SUBCHAPTER II—EDUCATION IN AGRICULTURE MANAGEMENT
### SUBCHAPTER I—INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION
4805 E Falcon Drive, Mesa AZ 85215 

Tel: (602) 574-5376 

To: Federal Aviation Administration 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

To: The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 (Ell-310) 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Sent via U.S. Certified Mail, 

Return Receipt Requested, 

And Email to David.F.Shavne(w{a_q,SIQI!., 

And Fax 202-366-7536 

January 4, 2017 

RECEIVED 

JAN 1 0 2017 

HEARING DOCKET 

~o\~ ·· dL\o2 

RE: FAA Case N. 2015WP910053 Classic Air Aviation, LLC 

Dear Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

In pursuant to the fact that each party have signed a settlement agreement, we are now withdrawing 

our appeal of this matter. 

Thank you in advance for your attention in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me with any 

questions at 602-574-5376. 

Jon Marple 

Operations Director 

President
Exhibit 32.1 Broadcast International, Inc. & Subsidiaries Certification Of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002  In connection with the quarterly report of Broadcast International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Rodney M. Tiede, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 5, 2009  /s/ Rodney M. Tiede Rodney M. Tiede Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel 05-21, Review of R13 Grants.
    Date: October 14, 2004.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Specialist, 
National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Res., 45 Center Drive, 
Natcher Bldg., Rm. 4AN44, Bethesda, MD 20892-6402, (301) 594-4809, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f69b97848fa99d939a9a8fb6989f9ed8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c9a4a8bbb096a2aca5a5b089a7a0a1e7aea6bf">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-21435 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-4326

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTONIO EUGENE RANDOLPH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:16-cr-00368-NCT-1)

Submitted: May 23, 2018 Decided: June 6, 2018

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Louis C. Allen, Federal Public Defender, Kathleen A. Gleason, Assistant Federal Public 

Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Greensboro, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Matthew G.T. Martin, United States Attorney, Eric L. Iverson, 

Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Eugene Randolph appeals the district court’s denial of his pretrial motion 

to suppress after entering a conditional guilty plea to receiving child pornography in 

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A), (b)(1) (2012). Randolph challenges the same 

warrant that we addressed in United States v. McLamb, 880 F.3d 685 (4th Cir. 2018), 

contending the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm. 

On appeal, Randolph’s central argument is that the warrant did not authorize the 

Government to search property outside the Eastern District of Virginia. Alternatively, he 

contends the warrant was issued in violation of Fed. R. Crim. P. 41, and the evidence 

should have been suppressed. We conclude these arguments are without merit, and the 

district court did not err in denying his motion to suppress. See McLamb, 880 F.3d at 

689-91; United States v. Werdene, 883 F.3d 204, 208, 214, 218-19 (3d Cir. 2018). The 

warrant authorized deployment of a network investigative technique on any computer 

user who logged into the target website; and even if this violated the 2015 version of Rule 

41, suppression would not produce an appreciable deterrence on law enforcement.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Table 23
                                   U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                           Central Valley Operations Office

                                        Madera Canal and Millerton Lake
                                                   2008
Monthly Deliveries in AF

    Water Users        Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr     May     Jun     Jul     Aug     Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec   Total

MADERA CANAL

Chowchilla WD             0       0       0       0       0   24661   31657    8541       0       0       0       0   64859
Madera ID                 0       0       0   10243   20325   22558   26959   19892     121       0       0       0  100098
Soquel                    0       0       4       4       4    2004    3004     941       4       4       4       0    5973

Total                     0       0       4   10247   20329   49223   61620   29374     125       4       4       0  170930


MILLERTON LAKE

County of Madera          1       1       2       4       4       4       5       6       5       4       2       1      39
Fresno County # 18        5       6       8      12      17      19      20      23      14      15       5       7     151
Gravelly Ford WD          0       0       0    1216    2022    1891    2011     811       0       0       0       0    7951
                                 .
Total                     6       7      10    1232    2043    1914    2036     840      19      19       7       8    8141


*  Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1963

_____________________________
W ILLIAM I SIAH J OHNSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. John L. Miller , Judge

. May 29, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

William Isiah Johnson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.48

 130.55

 130.62

 130.52

 130.46

 130.43

 130.45

 130.55

 130.72

 130.68

 130.76

 130.87

 130.59

 130.46

 130.54

 130.70

 130.82

 130.59

 130.45

 130.52

 130.72

 130.83

 130.85

 130.73

 130.67

 130.48

 130.50

 130.34

 130.43

 130.29

 631

 639

 646

 635

 629

 626

 628

 639

 658

 654

 663

 675

 643

 629

 637

 656

 669

 643

 628

 635

 658

 670

 673

 659

 652

 631

 633

 616

 626

 611

STORAGE

-2

+8

+7

-11

-6

-3

+2

+11

+19

-4

+9

+12

-32

-14

+8

+19

+13

-26

-15

+7

+23

+12

+3

-14

-7

-21

+2

-17

+10

-15

CHANGE

623

622

632

625

599

609

615

594

570

574

625

627

610

660

693

695

697

672

642

677

704

690

666

665

638

653

676

665

634

624

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 580

 574

 584

 586

 557

 566

 570

 544

 515

 531

 574

 576

 581

 622

 645

 641

 646

 640

 605

 628

 648

 639

 619

 628

 598

 620

 631

 630

 585

 588

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .28

 .30

 .40

 .43

 .43

 .43

 .41

 .41

 .43

 .53

 .68

 .56

 .44

 .46

 .33

 .38

 .36

 .47

 .53

 .43

 .35

 .58

 .44

 .30

 .34

 .31

 .20

 .37

 .38

 .37

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JUNE 2008 RUN DATE: 08/08/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -22 19,276 17,951 1,290 45 12.33 .00

ACRE-FEET -22 38,234 35,606 2,559 89

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,559

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 35,606

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2007 25.44

 633

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### **CHAPTER 44A—NATIVE AMERICAN TOURISM AND IMPROVING VISITOR EXPERIENCE**

Sec.
4351.
Purposes.
4352.
Definitions.
4353.
Integrating Federal tourism assets to strengthen Native tourism opportunities.
4354.
Native American tourism and branding enhancement.
4355.
Effect.
#### § 418.2255 What kind of evidence of a major life-changing event will you need to support your request for us to use a more recent tax year?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1255, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.