alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 118

 117

 118

 117

 122

 124

 118

 123

 121

 120

 121

 122

 123

 124

 122

 120

 130

 129

 129

 125

 124

 127

 127

 130

 131

 131

 131

 133

 134

 134

 134

 109

 111

 110

 110

 112

 112

 112

 112

 109

 111

 112

 114

 116

 116

 114

 114

 115

 115

 116

 118

 118

 120

 121

 122

 122

 122

 123

 126

 125

 126

 130

 113

 113

 113

 113

 116

 117

 114

 116

 115

 114

 115

 117

 119

 119

 118

 117

 121

 121

 121

 121

 121

 123

 124

 124

 125

 125

 127

 130

 129

 130

 132

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 28, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### §277d–30. Lower Rio Grande drainage conveyance canal projects; agreements with Mexico for construction, operation, and maintenance; division of costs; non-Federal assurances of one-half of Federal costs

The Secretary of State, acting through the United States Commissioner, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, is authorized, notwithstanding any other provision of law and subject to the conditions provided in this section and section 277d–31 of this title to conclude an agreement or agreements with the appropriate official or officials of the Government of the United Mexican States for the construction, operation, and maintenance by the United Mexican States under the supervision of the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, of a drainage conveyance canal through Mexican territory for the discharge of waters of El Morillo and other drains in the United Mexican States into the Gulf of Mexico in the manner, and having substantially the characteristics, described in said Commission's minute numbered 223, dated November 30, 1965. The agreement or agreements shall provide that the cost of construction including costs of design and right-of-way and the costs of operation and maintenance, shall be equally divided between the United Mexican States and the United States. Before concluding the agreement or agreements, the Secretary of State shall receive satisfactory assurances from private citizens or a responsible local group that they or it will pay to the United States Treasury one-half of the actual United States costs of such construction, including costs of design and right-of-way, and one-half of the actual costs of operation and maintenance allocated under such agreement or agreements to the United States. Payments to the United States Treasury under this section shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Pub. L. 89–584, §1, Sept. 19, 1966, 80 Stat. 808.)
### §1053. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–506, §3, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 639, which exempted funds distributed in accordance with this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
Second Department,

May, 1914.

#### In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Joseph J. Hearns and Charles Martin Camp, as Executors, etc., Appellants. Beatrix H. Barr and Another, Appellants, Respondents; Mabel V. Barr and Another, Respondents.

*Surrogate —jurisdiction*— *accounting —partnership property.*

Appeals by Joseph J. Hearns and another, individually and as executors, etc., of Stewart Barr, deceased, and by Beatrix H. Barr, by Fannie B. Barr, her guardian ad litem, from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Kings, entered in said court on the 30th day of June, 1913.

Per Curiam:

The decree of the surrogate of Kings county should be reversed in so far as it purports to deal with the membership in the New York Stock Exchange, with costs to appellants payable out of the estate. Though standing in the testator’s name, this membership having been purchased with firm funds, and so carried on the firm books, was copartnership property. The testamentary provision to sell and dispose of this seat was merely a direction to facilitate liquidation by the surviving partner and did not change the equitable title. Hence the disposition of the seat, and the value to be realized therefrom, are part of the general liquidation of *898the firm assets and liabilities, which are not within the jurisdiction of the surrogate. The reference by the executors in this proceeding to unliquidated assets of the copartnership contained in Schedule F, wherein this membership is enumerated, did not submit to the surrogate the firm liquidation. This modification, however, is without prejudice to any suit against the surviving partner for a firm accounting or otherwise. Jenks, P. J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county reversed in so far as it purports to deal with the membership in the New York Stock Exchange, with costs to appellants payable out of the estate, and as so modified affirmed.
#### Michael D. Lester et al., Doing Business as Copartners under the Name of Lester & Co., Appellants, v. Kurt Offenberger et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 846.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 782.04

 769.57

 755.18

 738.71

 729.77

 746.44

 745.11

 739.79

 733.13

 728.81

 734.81

 734.37

 732.36

 730.52

 726.36

 724.17

 721.62

 723.62

 721.51

 726.72

 732.55

 736.72

 741.30

 744.95

 742.11

 734.50

 731.56

 732.37

 733.68

 730.84

 725.97

 4,762

 3,819

 2,873

 1,968

 1,566

 2,364

 2,292

 2,020

 1,711

 1,526

 1,785

 1,766

 1,677

 1,598

 1,426

 1,341

 1,245

 1,320

 1,241

 1,441

 1,685

 1,873

 2,095

 2,283

 2,136

 1,772

 1,642

 1,677

 1,735

 1,611

 1,411

STORAGE

-912

-943

-946

-905

-402

+798

-72

-272

-309

-185

+259

-19

-89

-79

-172

-85

-96

+75

-79

+200

+244

+188

+222

+188

-147

-364

-130

+35

+58

-124

-200

CHANGE

212

159

123

100

187

516

270

163

134

127

131

90

70

54

45

57

50

72

48

151

123

95

112

95

120

100

166

204

217

125

83

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 672

 634

 600

 556

 390

 114

 306

 300

 290

 220

 0

 100

 115

 94

 132

 100

 98

 34

 88

 50

 0

 0

 0

 0

 194

 284

 232

 186

 188

 188

 184

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2019 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2019

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4,263 4,199 0 6,349

ACRE-FEET -4,263 8,329 0 12,593

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 12,593

 12,593

 5,674

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
§ 725.465 Dismissals for cause. ( a ) The administrative law judge may, at the request of any party, or on his or her own motion, dismiss a claim: ( 1 ) Upon the failure of the claimant or his or her representative to attend a hearing without good cause;
( 2 ) Upon the failure of the claimant to comply with a lawful order of the administrative law judge; or
( 3 ) Where there has been a prior final adjudication of the claim or defense to the claim under the provisions of this subchapter and no new evidence is submitted (except as provided in part 727 of this subchapter; see § 725.4(d)).
( b ) A party who is not a proper party to the claim (see § 725.360) shall be dismissed by the administrative law judge. The administrative law judge shall not dismiss the operator designated as the responsible operator by the district director, except upon the motion or written agreement of the Director.
( c ) In any case where a dismissal of a claim, defense, or party is sought, the administrative law judge shall issue an order to show cause why the dismissal should not be granted and afford all parties a reasonable time to respond to such order. After the time for response has expired, the administrative law judge shall take such action as is appropriate to rule on the dismissal, which may include an order dismissing the claim, defense or party.
( d ) No claim shall be dismissed in a case with respect to which payments prior to final adjudication have been made to the claimant in accordance with § 725.522, except upon the motion or written agreement of the Director.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 186

 175

 173

 177

 179

 168

 183

 170

 174

 179

 187

 204

 214

 198

 191

 185

 181

 165

 169

 163

 152

 137

 156

 150

 149

 145

 162

 189

 150

 153

 154

 157

 157

 154

 156

 160

 159

 166

 173

 177

 178

 178

 173

 162

 154

 141

 131

 133

 129

 124

 131

 134

 133

 128

 143

 148

 163

 164

 164

 166

 165

 162

 164

 166

 168

 175

 181

 185

 186

 186

 184

 173

 168

 154

 146

 149

 141

 131

 143

 140

 142

 140

 150

 157

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 4, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### CMP-6

Revised: May 3, 2004 

## San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Supplemental Application Form



# Conservation Management Practices: GRAPES

Farm Name: CMP Plan Years: to

Table Grape Acreage: Wine Grape Acreage: Raisin Acreage:

Fallow Acreage Last Planted in Grapes:

Land Preparation/

Cultivation Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.

Alternate Till, ac Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements, ac Bed/Row Size or Spacing, ac Mulching, ac Chemigation/Fertigation, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category Combined Operations, ac Night Farming, ac Conservation Irrigation, ac Non-Tillage/Chemical Tillage, ac Conservation Tillage, ac Precision Farming (GPS), ac Cover Crop, ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac
Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Harvest Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.
Continuous Tray/DOV, ac Night Harvesting, ac Equipment Change/Tech. Improvements, ac No Burning (Paper Trays), ac Hand Harvesting, ac Shuttle System, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above:



### Other Select at least one of the following CMPs. Note: 100% of the total crop acreage must be covered by the selected CMPs.

Alternate Till, ac Multiple CMPs in Another Category

Bulk Materials Control No Burning, ac Grinding/Chipping/Shredding, ac Permanent Crop, ac Integrated Pest Management (IPM), ac Sulfur, Reduct. or Elimination of Dusting, ac Irrigation Power Units Surface Roughening, ac Mechanical Pruning, ac Other (approved on a case-by-case basis), ac Mulching, ac Please describe the specifics of the practice(s) chosen above: CMP

6
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Techprecision Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Reindl,
      the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Mary Desmond, the Chief Financial Officer,
      of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






June
      28,
      2007


/s/
              James G. ReindlJames
              G. ReindlChief
              Executive Officer




/s/
              Mary
              DesmondMary
              DesmondChief
              Financial Officer
Table 27

U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation

Central Valley Operations Office

Tehama-Colusa Canal

2014

Monthly Deliveries in AF

Water Users Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total

Colusa County WD 1306 2396 2201 2296 4565 5666 6717 4465 3166 3439 1454 18 37689

Cortina WD 12 6 7 7 29 24 79 41 40 48 47 0 340

Davis WD 106 43 138 131 532 541 492 343 272 307 167 0 3072

Dunnigan WD 33 560 485 458 359 399 576 521 196 213 31 0 3831

4-M Water District 85 14 41 127 184 102 183 71 59 52 34 0 952

Glenn-Colusa ID 0 1016 70 362 3130 3095 3945 3508 3005 3162 0 0 21293

Glenn Valley WD 18 16 20 60 93 123 126 43 78 65 19 0 661

Glide WD 238 143 47 58 270 452 574 357 183 94 6 0 2422

Holthouse WD 1 5 3 0 2 4 13 7 11 10 0 0 56

Kanawha WD 1499 918 173 389 1387 2168 2348 1861 1268 301 180 0 12492

Kirkwood WD 0 1 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14

La Grande WD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Myers-Marsh MWC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Orland-Artois WD 1843 666 182 243 437 1093 2050 1186 760 920 253 0 9633

Westside WD 1091 665 1425 1789 3696 4393 4641 3105 2657 1730 1270 0 26462

Total 6232 6449 4792 5933 14684 18060 21744 15508 11695 10341 3461 18 118917

* Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
### §1300b–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–467, §2, Oct. 6, 1972, 86 Stat. 781, which provided for distribution of per capita shares to tribal members and authorized the governing body of each tribal group to use the balance of funds for any purposes approved by the Secretary of the Interior, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
### §178. Repealed. Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 654, §1(46), 65 Stat. 703

Section, act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 79, 40 Stat. 373, related to revocable permit to hospital to use certain lands.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.31

 130.11

 130.11

 130.04

 129.97

 129.95

 129.94

 130.17

 130.29

 130.39

 130.47

 130.56

 130.40

 130.09

 130.03

 130.17

 130.13

 130.14

 130.14

 130.13

 130.12

 130.11

 130.24

 130.42

 130.33

 130.22

 130.13

 130.05

 129.97

 130.00

 613

 592

 592

 585

 578

 576

 574

 598

 611

 622

 630

 640

 623

 590

 584

 598

 594

 595

 595

 594

 593

 592

 605

 625

 615

 603

 594

 586

 578

 581

STORAGE

-2

-21

+0

-7

-7

-2

-2

+24

+13

+11

+8

+10

-17

-33

-6

+14

-4

+1

+0

-1

-1

-1

+13

+20

-10

-12

-9

-8

-8

+3

CHANGE

58

47

52

49

49

52

59

71

60

59

57

58

56

56

71

80

64

64

63

62

62

62

63

64

62

62

63

64

64

70

INFLOW

 34

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

PUTAH

 25

 25

 19

 20

 20

 20

 27

 26

 20

 20

 20

 20

 32

 40

 40

 40

 33

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 23

 21

 34

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .03

 .00

 .07

 .02

 .12

 .09

 .07

 .04

 .08

 .07

 .04

 .03

 .06

 .13

 .28

 .12

 .08

 .08

 .05

 .02

 .09

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .04

INCHES

 .30

 1.50

 .00

 .33

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

NOVEMBER 2008 RUN DATE: 12/01/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -34 1,823 850 991 1 1.86 2.27

ACRE-FEET -34 3,616 1,686 1,966 2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,966

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 1,686

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.27

JULY 1, 2008 2.94

 615

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §112. Persons present at delivery of goods and money

The superintendent, agent, or subagent, together with such military officer as the President may direct, shall be present, and certify to the delivery of all goods and money required to be paid or delivered to the Indians.

(R.S. §2088.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §2088 derived from act June 30, 1834, ch. 162, §13, 4 Stat. 737.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Indian Agents

The services of Indian agents have been dispensed with. See note set out under section 64 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

Independent Auditors’ Consent 

 

To the Members of Armkel, LLC 

Princeton, New Jersey 

 

Weconsent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-73160) on Form S-4 of Armkel, LLC of our report dated December 11, 2001, except as to the fifth paragraph of Note 1 which is as of February 20, 2003, with respect to thecombined statements of revenue and expenses, changes in net assets and comprehensive earnings, and cash flows of Carter-Wallace, Inc. Consumer Business-Excluding Antiperspirant/Deodorant Products in the United States and Canada and Pet Products forthe period from April 1, 2001 to September 28, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of Armkel, LLC. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

New York, New York 

March 11, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 160

 161

 162

 167

 166

 169

 177

 180

 175

 181

 185

 196

 194

 185

 185

 184

 190

 183

 185

 185

 178

 171

 166

 160

 159

 153

 162

 151

 142

 142

 153

 154

 156

 157

 158

 161

 169

 172

 163

 167

 173

 180

 184

 181

 180

 178

 179

 178

 175

 173

 168

 164

 158

 156

 153

 143

 140

 140

 139

 138

 157

 157

 158

 160

 161

 165

 171

 175

 171

 172

 177

 188

 189

 183

 181

 180

 181

 180

 178

 177

 172

 168

 164

 158

 156

 147

 146

 146

 140

 140

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 707.25

 707.50

 707.73

 707.92

 708.16

 708.33

 707.13

 707.31

 707.49

 707.65

 707.79

 706.90

 707.12

 707.21

 707.33

 707.49

 707.65

 707.75

 707.84

 707.13

 707.20

 707.32

 707.38

 707.66

 708.00

 707.17

 707.60

 707.14

 707.44

 707.79

 708.11

 784

 791

 797

 803

 809

 814

 781

 786

 791

 795

 799

 774

 780

 783

 786

 791

 795

 798

 801

 781

 783

 786

 788

 795

 805

 782

 794

 781

 789

 799

 808

STORAGE

+0

+7

+6

+6

+6

+5

-33

+5

+5

+4

+4

-25

+6

+3

+3

+5

+4

+3

+3

-20

+2

+3

+2

+7

+10

-23

+12

-13

+8

+10

+9

CHANGE

3

5

4

4

4

4

-9

4

4

3

3

-6

4

3

3

4

3

3

3

-5

2

2

1

4

5

-5

6

-2

4

5

5

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 8

 1

 1

 1

 1

 7

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 5

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7

 0

 5

 0

 0

 0

 1025

 1040

 1000

 1030

 1030

TIME

 .18

 .20

 .22

 .24

 .23

COPPER

 .63

 .70

 .74

 .76

 .78

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +24 68 0 52

ACRE-FEET +24 135 0 103

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 103

 103

 784

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .002

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

Table 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 3,960

 3,507

 3,920

 3,950

 3,842

 3,665

 3,549

 3,869

 4,066

 3,898

 3,588

 3,942

 3,276

 3,102

 3,713

 4,176

 3,695

 3,525

 3,274

 3,635

 3,381

 4,269

 3,406

 3,394

 3,487

 3,526

 2,727

 3,422

 3,771

 3,118

 3,256

 95,722

 94,698

 93,295

 92,354

 91,489

 90,564

 89,518

 88,414

 87,669

 87,148

 86,493

 85,577

 85,043

 83,903

 82,655

 82,050

 81,915

 81,329

 80,611

 79,691

 79,160

 78,414

 78,549

 77,857

 77,188

 76,642

 76,159

 74,942

 74,446

 74,306

 73,553

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2005 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

 99,682

 98,205

 97,215

 96,304

 95,331

 94,229

 93,067

 92,283

 91,735

 91,046

 90,081

 89,519

 88,319

 87,005

 86,368

 86,226

 85,610

 84,854

 83,885

 83,326

 82,541

 82,683

 81,955

 81,251

 80,675

 80,168

 78,886

 78,364

 78,217

 77,424

 76,809

 5,831,000

 5,809,000

 5,788,000

 5,767,000

 5,745,000

 5,724,000

 5,703,000

 5,682,000

 5,660,000

 5,639,000

 5,618,000

 5,596,000

 5,575,000

 5,554,000

 5,532,000

 5,511,000

 5,490,000

 5,468,000

 5,447,000

 5,426,000

 5,404,000

 5,383,000

 5,362,000

 5,341,000

 5,319,000

 5,298,000

 5,277,000

 5,255,000

 5,234,000

 5,213,000

 5,191,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 100,760