alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Site visit review of the Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) at the University of Nebraska Lincoln by the Division of Materials Research (DMR) #1203.                    

*Dates & Times:*                         May 21, 2012; 7:15 a.m.-8:30 p.m., May 22, 2012; 7:15 a.m.-3:00 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Part open.                    

*Contact Person for More Information:*                         Dr. Sean L. Jones, Program Director, Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers Program, Division of Materials Research, Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-2986.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide advice and recommendations concerning further support of the MRSEC at the University of Nebraska.                    

## Agenda

## Monday, May 21, 2012

7:15 a.m.-4:30 p.m. Open—Review of the MRSEC

5 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Closed—Executive Session

6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open—Dinner

## Tuesday, May 22, 2012

7:15 a.m.-9:50 a.m. Closed—Executive Session

9:50 a.m.-3 p.m. Closed—Executive Session, Draft and Review Report

*Reason for Closing:*                         The work being reviewed may include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated with the MRSEC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: April 24, 2012.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-10273 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
§ 10010.19 Format. ( a ) An EA may be prepared in any format useful to facilitate planning and decision making.
( b ) An EA may be combined with any other planning or decision making document; however, that portion which analyzes the environmental impacts of the proposal and alternatives will be clearly and separately identified and not spread throughout or interwoven into other sections of the document.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Pamphlets of the Women's Bureau

              																			United States. Women's Bureau.				"Minimum Wage and the Woman Worker, Pamphlet 8,"		*Pamphlets of the Women's Bureau*		(1960).				https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/266/item/5918, accessed on September 6, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Presidential Documents

56925

Federal Register 

Vol. 69, No. 184

Thursday, September 23, 2004

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7818 of September 20, 2004

National Farm Safety and Health Week, 2004

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation

America’s farm economy is strong and growing. Farm income is strong, 

farm exports are at a record high, and my Administration is working to 

ensure that American farm products are sold all over the world. During 

National Farm Safety and Health Week, we reflect on the contributions 

of America’s farm and ranch families and underscore our commitment to 

making our farms safer and to protecting our farm and ranch land. 

The safety and health of our farm and ranch families are of critical importance. These Americans perform tasks that contain risks—they operate farm 

machinery, apply agricultural chemicals and fertilizers, handle large and 

unpredictable livestock, and work in places where dusts and toxins can 

contaminate the air. We must continue to raise awareness of dangers and 

proper safety precautions and equipment, particularly among our young 

people involved in agriculture. Through education and training, we can 

help save lives and improve the well-being of our Nation’s farmers and 

ranchers. 

Our Nation’s farmers and ranchers help feed and clothe people around 

the world, and they are now helping provide more energy for the American 

people. By promoting a safer farm and ranch environment, we can strengthen 

our agricultural economy and build a more prosperous future for all our 

citizens. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim September 19 through 

September 25, 2004, as National Farm Safety and Health Week. I call upon 

the agencies, organizations, and businesses that serve America’s agricultural 

workers to strengthen their commitment to promoting farm safety and health 

programs. I also urge all Americans to honor our agricultural heritage and 

to recognize our farmers and ranchers for their remarkable contributions 

to our Nation’s vitality and prosperity. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twentieth day 

of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand four, and of the IndependVerDate jul<14>2003 09:16 Sep 22, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4705 Sfmt 4790 E:\FR\FM\23SED0.SGM 23SED0

[FR Doc. 04–21506

Filed 9–22–04; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 

ence of the United States of America the two hundred and twenty-ninth.

W
### §8783. Applicability to certain natural gas projects

#### (a) Exception for certain natural gas projects

Nothing in this Act or the amendments made by this Act shall apply to any activity relating to a project—

(1) for the development of natural gas and the construction and operation of a pipeline to transport natural gas from Azerbaijan to Turkey and Europe;

(2) that provides to Turkey and countries in Europe energy security and energy independence from the Government of the Russian Federation and other governments with jurisdiction over persons subject to sanctions imposed under this Act or amendments made by this Act; and

(3) that was initiated before August 10, 2012, pursuant to a production-sharing agreement, or an ancillary agreement necessary to further a production-sharing agreement, entered into with, or a license granted by, the government of a country other than Iran before August 10, 2012.

#### (b) Termination of exception

#### (1) In general

The exception under subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to a project described in that subsection on or after the date on which the President certifies to the appropriate congressional committees that—

(A) the percentage of the equity interest in the project held by or on behalf of an entity described in paragraph (2) has increased relative to the percentage of the equity interest in the project held by or on behalf of such an entity on January 1, 2002; or

(B) an entity described in paragraph (2) has assumed an operational role in the project.

#### (2) Entity described

An entity described in this paragraph is—

(A) an entity—

(i) owned or controlled by the Government of Iran or identified under section 560.304 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations (relating to the definition of the Government of Iran); or

(ii) organized under the laws of Iran or with the participation or approval of the Government of Iran;

(B) an entity owned or controlled by an entity described in subparagraph (A); or

(C) a successor entity to an entity described in subparagraph (A).

(Pub. L. 112–158, title VI, §603, Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1264.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 112–158, Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1214, known as the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 8701 of this title and Tables.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Lesloyd Realty Corporation, Respondent, and Charles Wahl et al., as Copartners Doing Business as Ardor of Paris, Appellants.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.
§ 667.825 What special rules apply to reviews of NFJP and WIA INA grant selections? ( a ) An applicant whose application for funding as a WIA INA grantee under 20 CFR part 668 or as an NFJP grantee under 20 CFR part 669 is denied in whole or in part may request an administrative review under § 667.800(a) with to determine whether there is a basis in the record to support the decision. This appeal will not in any way interfere with the designation and funding of another organization to serve the area in question during the appeal period. The available remedy in such an appeal is the right to be designated in the future as the WIA INA or NFJP grantee for the remainder of the current grant cycle. Neither retroactive nor immediately effective selection status may be awarded as relief in a non-selection appeal under this section.
( b ) If the ALJ rules that the organization should have been selected and the organization continues to meet the requirements of 20 CFR part 668 or part 669, we will select and fund the organization within 90 days of the ALJ's decision unless the end of the 90-day period is within six (6) months of the end of the funding period. An applicant so selected is not entitled to the full grant amount, but will only receive the funds remaining in the grant that have not been expended by the current grantee through its operation of the grant and its subsequent closeout.
( c ) Any organization selected and/or funded as a WIA INA or NFJP grantee is subject to being removed as grantee in the event an ALJ decision so orders. The Grant Officer provides instructions on transition and close-out to a grantee which is removed. All parties must agree to the provisions of this paragraph as a condition for WIA INA or NFJP funding.
( d ) A successful appellant which has not been awarded relief because of the application of paragraph (b) of this section is eligible to compete for funds in the immediately subsequent two-year grant cycle. In such a situation, we will not issue a waiver of competition and for the area and will select a grantee through the normal competitive process.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSimulator Evaluation of Simplified Propulsion-Only Emergency Flight Control Systems on Transport AircraftWith the advent of digital engine control systems, considering the use of engine thrust for emergency flight control has become feasible. Many incidents have occurred in which engine thrust supplemented or replaced normal aircraft flight controls. In most of these cases, a crash has resulted, and more than 1100 lives have been lost. The NASA Dryden Flight Research Center has developed a propulsion-controlled aircraft (PCA) system in which computer-controlled engine thrust provides emergency flight control capability. Using this PCA system, an F-15 and an MD-11 airplane have been landed without using any flight controls. In simulations, C-17, B-757, and B-747 PCA systems have also been evaluated successfully. These tests used full-authority digital electronic control systems on the engines. Developing simpler PCA systems that can operate without full-authority engine control, thus allowing PCA technology to be installed on less capable airplanes or at lower cost, is also a desire. Studies have examined simplified ?PCA Ultralite? concepts in which thrust control is provided using an autothrottle system supplemented by manual differential throttle control. Some of these concepts have worked well. The PCA Ultralite study results are presented for simulation tests of MD-11, B-757, C-17, and B-747 aircraft.Document ID19990046435Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBurcham, Frank W., Jr.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Kaneshige, John*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Bull, John*(Caelum Research Corp. Moffett Field, CA United States)*Maine, Trindel A.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1999Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberH-2331NASA/TM-1999-206578NAS 1.15:206578Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-35-14Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990046435.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §1055. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–506, §5, Aug. 30, 1964, 78 Stat. 639, which authorized prescription of rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1 The Honorable Dean Whipple, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3809

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Lynda J. Craig, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: January 6, 2009 Filed: January 16, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Lynda Craig appeals the se ntence the district court 1 imposed after she pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute meth amphetamine and possessing a firearm in furtherance of the conspiracy. Craig’s c ounsel has moved to w ithdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Craig pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement containing a waiver of any right to appeal unless her sentence exceededthe statutory maximum or was an illegal-2- sentence. We now enforce the appeal waiv er because the record establishes Craig knowingly and voluntarily entered into the pl ea agreement and waiver; the appeal falls within the scope of the waiver; and no miscarriage of justice would result from enforcing the waiver. See United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); United States v. EstradaBahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Having reviewed the record i ndependently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal beyond the scope of the waiver. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
Exhibit 99.2









Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Management of Protective Life Insurance Company and The Bank of New York, as Indenture Trustee of Protective
Life Secured Trust 2005-14, (collectively the "Management")
and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee of Protective Life Secured Trust 2005-14 (the "Trust"):

We have examined Management's assertion, included in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)," that the collection of payments on the funding agreements and distribution of payments to the noteholders has occurred as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee during the year ended December 31, 2005.  Management is responsible for the assertion.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting management's assertion and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, Management's assertion referred to above is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria defined in the accompanying "Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)."



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Birmingham, AlabamaMarch 31, 2006











Management Assertion Regarding the Collection and Distribution of Trust
Money by The Bank of New York (Indenture Trustee)





Management of the Trust asserts that it has collected payments on the funding agreements and distributed payments to the noteholders as required by Section 5.02 of the Indenture agreement dated November 7, 2003 between the Trust and the Indenture Trustee for the year ended December 31, 2005.  This assertion is based on the following criteria:

1. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2005, are included in Protective Life's Secured Trusts P & I Payments: 1/1/05 through 12/31/05 (P & I Payments report).
2. The payments made by Protective Life on the funding agreements that secured the Notes, for the year ended December 31, 2005, are included in the Indenture Trustee's History of Transactions List.
3. The amounts due on the Notes are reported as a component of the charges from Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company, on the Indenture Trustee's Payment Obligation Report System (PORS Report).
4. Charges from Cede & Co. are included in the Indenture Trustee's screen prints titled The Depository Trust Company Activity History Details, which represent the charge confirmations to Cede & Co., the nominee of the Depository Trust Company.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Kevin Ericksteen, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2001 of
Power Professionals, Inc.

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented   in  this   annual   report  our   conclusions   about  the
          effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 31, 2003
/s/ Kevin Ericksteen
------------------------
By: Kevin Ericksteen, CEO