25404 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 83 / Monday, April 30, 2012 / Notices 

5 In the initiation notice that published on March 

30, 2012 (77 FR 19179), covering cases with the 

February anniversary dates, the Department 

inadvertently stated that it had received a timely 

request to revoke in part the antidumping duty 

order on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

the PRC with respect to one exporter, however, the 

Department actually received timely requests with 

respect to two exporters. 

6 If one of the above-named companies does not 

qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 

Glycine from the PRC who have not qualified for 

a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this 

review as part of the single PRC entity of which the 

named exporters are a part. 

7 If the above-named company does not qualify 

for a separate rate, all other exporters of Sodium 

Hexametaphosphate from the PRC who have not 

qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be 

covered by this review as part of the single PRC 

entity of which the named exporters are a part. 

8 In the initiation notice that published on March 

30, 2012 (77 FR 19179), covering cases with 

February anniversary dates, the Department 

inadvertently did not note that it had received 

timely requests to revoke in part the antidumping 

duty order on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from Vietnam with respect to two exporters. 

During any administrative review 

covering all or part of a period falling 

between the first and second or third 

and fourth anniversary of the 

publication of an antidumping duty 

order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 

determination under 19 CFR 

351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 

suspended investigation (after sunset 

review), the Secretary, if requested by a 

domestic interested party within 30 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the review, will 

determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. 

United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 

2002), as appropriate, whether 

antidumping duties have been absorbed 

by an exporter or producer subject to the 

review if the subject merchandise is 

sold in the United States through an 

importer that is affiliated with such 

exporter or producer. The request must 

include the name(s) of the exporter or 

producer for which the inquiry is 

requested. 

For the first administrative review of 

any order, there will be no assessment 

of antidumping or countervailing duties 

on entries of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption during the relevant 

provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of 

the order, if such a gap period is 

applicable to the period of review. 

Interested parties must submit 

applications for disclosure under 

administrative protective orders in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 

January 22, 2008, the Department 

published Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Documents Submission Procedures; 

APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 

22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 

administrative reviews included in this 

notice of initiation. Parties wishing to 

participate in any of these 

administrative reviews should ensure 

that the meet the requirements of these 

procedures (e.g., the filing of separate 

letters of appearance as discussed at 19 

CFR 351.103(d)). 

Any party submitting factual 

information in an antidumping duty or 

countervailing duty proceeding must 

certify to the accuracy and completeness 

of that information. See section 782(b) 

of the Act. Parties are hereby reminded 

that revised certification requirements 

are in effect for company/government 

officials as well as their representatives 

in all segments of any antidumping duty 

or countervailing duty proceedings 

initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See 

Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 

7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim Final 

Rule’’), amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) 

and (2). The formats for the revised 

certifications are provided at the end of 

the Interim Final Rule. The Department 

intends to reject factual submissions in 

any proceeding segments initiated on or 

after March 14, 2011 if the submitting 

party does not comply with the revised 

certification requirements. 

These initiations and this notice are 

in accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: April 20, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10238 Filed 4–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–820] 

Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat 

Products From India: Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 30, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George McMahon or James Terpstra, 

AD/CVD Operations Office 3, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1167 and (202) 

482–3965, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2011, the Department 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice announcing the opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain hotrolled carbon steel flat products from 

India for the period December 1, 2010, 

through November 30, 2011. See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review, 76 FR 74773, 

74774 (December 1, 2011). 

On December 30, 2011, and January 3, 

2012, Nucor Corporation and U.S. Steel 

Corporation (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’) 

timely requested that the Department 

conduct an administrative review of 

Essar Steel Limited (‘‘Essar’’), Ispat 

Industries Limited (‘‘Ispat’’), JSW Steel 

Limited (‘‘JSW’’), and Tata Steel Limited 

(‘‘Tata’’). Pursuant to these requests and 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), the Department 

published a notice initiating the 

administrative review of Essar, Ispat, 

JSW, and Tata. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 77 FR 4759 

(January 31, 2012). 

On January 31, 2012, the Department 

placed on the record and invited 

interested parties to comment on U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

data, which the Department stated it 

would use for respondent selection in 

the instant review. See Memorandum to 

the File from George McMahon, Senior 

International Trade Analyst, through 

Melissa Skinner, Office Director, 

concerning ‘‘Certain Hot Rolled Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from India: Customs 

and Border Protection Data for Selection 

of Respondents for Individual Review,’’ 

dated January 31, 2012. We received no 

comments from interested parties on the 

CBP data. 

On February 1, 7, 14, and 15, 2012, 

JSW, Tata, Essar, and Ispat, respectively, 

submitted letters informing the 

Department that they did not make 

shipments of subject merchandise to the 

United States during the period of 

review. 

On March 7, 2012 and March 29, 

2012, respectively, Nucor Corporation 

and U.S. Steel Corporation timely 

withdrew their respective requests for 

review of Essar, Ispat, JSW, and Tata. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the parties 

that requested a review withdraw the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 83 / Monday, April 30, 2012 / Notices 25405 

1See, e.g., Certain Lined Paper Products From 

India: Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and Extension of Time 

Limit for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 21781, 21783 

(May 11, 2009). 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. As noted above, 

Petitioners withdrew their respective 

requests for review of Essar, Ispat, JSW, 

and Tata within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation. 

Moreover, no other interested party 

requested an administrative review of 

these respondents. Therefore, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) 

and consistent with our practice, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

Essar, Ispat, JSW, and Tata, and in its 

entirety.1

Assessment 

The Department will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. For Essar, Ispat, 

JSW, and Tata, antidumping duties shall 

be assessed at rates equal to the cash 

deposit of estimated antidumping duties 

required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

date of publication of this notice of 

rescission of administrative review. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent increase in antidumping 

duties by the amount of antidumping 

and/or countervailing duties 

reimbursed. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under an APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 24, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10351 Filed 4–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–816] 

Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat 

Products From the Republic of Korea: 

Extension of Time Limit for the 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cindy Robinson, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3797. 

Background 

On October 3, 2011, the U.S. 

Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) published a notice of 

initiation of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on 

corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat 

products from the Republic of Korea, 

covering the period August 1, 2010, to 

July 31, 2011. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests 

for Revocation in Part, 76 FR 61076 

(October 3, 2011). The preliminary 

results of this review are currently due 

no later than May 2, 2012. 

Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary 

Results 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), 

requires that the Department make a 

preliminary determination within 245 

days after the last day of the anniversary 

month of an order for which a review 

is requested. Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act further states that if it is not 

practicable to complete the review 

within the time period specified, the 

administering authority may extend the 

245-day period to issue its preliminary 

results to up to 365 days. 

We determine that completion of the 

preliminary results of this review within 

the 245-day period is not practicable. 

Additional time is needed to gather and 

analyze a significant amount of 

information pertaining to sales 

practices, manufacturing costs and 

corporate relationships pertaining to 

each company participating in the 

review. Given the number and 

complexity of issues in this case, in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act, we are fully extending by 120 

days the time period for issuing the 

preliminary results of review. Therefore, 

the preliminary results are now due no 

later than August 30, 2012. The final 

results continue to be due 120 days after 

publication of the preliminary results. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

sections 751(a)(3)(A) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: April 24, 2012. 

Gary Taverman, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10350 Filed 4–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Modification to Content Published by 

Import Administration in the Federal 

Register 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: Due to the mounting costs of 

publishing notices in the Federal 

Register and widespread access to the 

internet, Import Administration intends 

to modify the manner in which its 

determinations in antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings are 

made available to the public. The 

content of many of Import 

Administration’s Federal Register 

notices will be reduced, with much of 

the information previously included in 

our Federal Register notices being made 

available to the public in separate 

memoranda published on Import 

Administration’s Web site. Extension 

notices for preliminary and final results 

of reviews and certain other notices will 

no longer be published in the Federal 

Register. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 30, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dustin Ross, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

1, Import Administration, or Shana 

Hofstetter, Office of Chief Counsel for 

Import Administration, U.S. Department 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES