alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2772. Repealed. Pub. L. 102–429, title I, §112(e), Oct. 21, 1992, 106 Stat. 2195

Section, Pub. L. 90–629, ch. 3, §32, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1325, prohibited certain military export financing by Export-Import Bank.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 103

 110

 100

 101

 112

 112

 113

 121

 115

 113

 107

 108

 110

 107

 111

 109

 115

 112

 115

 117

 96

 98

 107

 103

 97

 97

 102

 100

 99

 104

 84

 93

 86

 91

 95

 101

 103

 103

 98

 103

 98

 97

 98

 99

 94

 94

 102

 97

 99

 87

 86

 89

 89

 92

 89

 88

 87

 83

 87

 79

 97

 102

 95

 96

 102

 106

 108

 113

 109

 109

 104

 102

 105

 103

 102

 103

 109

 107

 108

 96

 90

 93

 96

 97

 94

 93

 93

 92

 91

 91

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 11, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
### §1300l–6. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–434, title II, §208, Oct. 31, 1994, 108 Stat. 4535, which set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
March 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

1,874

1 738.05 1,936 62 31 0 0

2 739.19 1,991 55 28 0 0

3 740.34 2,047 56 28 0 0

4 741.48 2,104 57 29 0 0

5 742.66 2,164 60 30 0 0

6 740.03 2,032 -132 27 94 0

7 732.72 1,693 -339 17 188 0

8 728.84 1,527 -166 34 118 0

9 731.58 1,643 116 58 0 0

10 734.24 1,760 117 141 82 0

11 731.15 1,624 -136 79 148 0

12 727.29 1,464 -160 65 146 0

13 739.49 2,006 542 319 46 0

14 761.40 3,265 1,259 854 219 0

15 758.29 3,066 -199 341 441 0

16 748.52 2,480 -586 181 476 0

17 740.24 2,042 -438 129 350 0

18 737.97 1,933 -109 97 152 0

19 739.25 1,994 61 181 150 0

20 740.44 2,052 58 181 152 0

21 739.38 2,000 -52 126 152 0

22 737.19 1,895 -105 97 150 0

23 733.90 1,745 -150 72 148 0

24 730.97 1,617 -128 58 123 0

25 729.81 1,568 -49 50 75 0

26 728.36 1,508 -60 44 74 0

27 729.13 1,539 31 43 27 0

28 732.55 1,685 146 74 0 0

29 737.90 1,929 244 123 0 0

30 739.40 2,001 72 96 60 0

31 738.52 1,959 -42 81 102 0

TOTALS 85 3,714 3,673 0

ACRE-FEET 85 7,367 7,285 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 7,285

Spill 0

Total 7,285

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 4/1/2023
#### The People of the State of New York v. Phocion M. Daniel, Jr.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION





I, B.K.
Gogia, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the registrant, certify
that:





1.           
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of InferX
Corporation;





2.           
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.           
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.           
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)           [this
paragraph has been omitted]





(c)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





(d)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.           
The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  April
15, 2009


By:
              /s/ B.K. GogiaB.K.
      GogiaPrincipal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer
§ 702.337 Formal hearings; change of time or place for hearings; postponements. ( a ) Except for good cause shown, hearings shall be held at convenient locations not more than 75 miles from the claimant's residence.
( b ) Once a formal hearing has been scheduled, continuances shall not be granted except in cases of extreme hardship or where attendance of a party or his or her representative is mandated at a previously scheduled judicial proceeding. Unless the ground for the request arises thereafter, requests for continuances must be received by the Chief Administrative Law Judge at least 10 days before the scheduled hearing date, must be served upon the other parties and must specify the extreme hardship or previously scheduled judicial proceeding claimed.
( c ) The Chief Administrative Law Judge or the administrative law judge assigned to the case may change the time and place of the hearing, or temporarily adjourn a hearing, on his own motion or for good cause shown by a party. The parties shall be given not less than 10 days' notice of the new time and place of the hearing, unless they agree to such change without notice.
[42 FR 42552, Aug. 23, 1977]
§ 20.102 Definitions. ( a ) The following terms are used throughout this part and have the following meanings: ( 1 ) *Department* means the U.S. Department of the Interior and any of its components.
( 2 ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of the Interior.
( 3 ) *Bureau* means each major program operating component of the Department, the Office of the Secretary, the Office of the Solicitor, and the Office of the Inspector General.
( 4 ) *Employee* means a regular employee, a special Government employee, and a contract education employee in the Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs or the Bureau of Indian Affairs, unless the text of a particular subpart, section, or paragraph indicates that either regular employees or special Government employees are not intended to be covered by that subpart, section or paragraph. Volunteers in National Parks whose services are accepted pursuant to 16 U.S.C. 18g are not employees.
( b ) *Specific definitions.* Additional definitions of terms specifically associated with a particular subpart, section, or paragraph are found in that subpart, section, or paragraph.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 821.30

 821.28

 821.23

 821.21

 821.23

 821.25

 821.27

 821.28

 821.29

 820.92

 820.36

 819.81

 819.24

 818.66

 818.07

 817.47

 816.85

 816.22

 815.62

 814.99

 814.36

 813.72

 813.00

 812.33

 811.62

 811.14

 810.70

 810.28

 809.87

 809.42

 809.10

 28.34

 28.32

 28.28

 28.26

 28.28

 28.30

 28.31

 28.32

 28.33

 27.99

 27.47

 26.96

 26.45

 25.93

 25.40

 24.88

 24.34

 23.80

 23.30

 22.77

 22.26

 21.74

 21.17

 20.65

 20.10

 19.73

 19.40

 19.09

 18.79

 18.46

 18.23

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.02

-0.05

-0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.01

+0.01

-0.35

-0.52

-0.51

-0.52

-0.52

-0.53

-0.52

-0.54

-0.54

-0.50

-0.53

-0.51

-0.52

-0.58

-0.52

-0.55

-0.37

-0.33

-0.31

-0.30

-0.33

-0.23

CHANGE

12

14

2

11

32

33

36

28

28

0

-106

-13

-17

-19

-16

-17

-26

-27

-12

-23

-19

-19

-49

-22

-36

-1

-13

-4

5

-9

-4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 15

 15

 18

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 169

 150

 236

 238

 237

 243

 242

 240

 240

 238

 239

 237

 237

 236

 240

 238

 180

 150

 150

 154

 153

 110

OUTLET

 7

 9

 8

 6

 7

 8

 11

 8

 8

 6

 5

 6

 6

 6

 6

 5

 5

 4

 4

 3

 3

 4

 5

 2

 1

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .23

 .29

 .27

 .20

 .22

 .25

 .35

 .26

 .26

 .20

 .18

 .22

 .21

 .20

 .22

 .19

 .17

 .14

 .13

 .12

 .13

 .15

 .18

 .09

 .06

 .11

 .12

 .12

 .14

 .14

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 RUN DATE: 03/11/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -10.16 -251 4,695 0 161 5.68 .00

ACRE-FEET -10,160 -498 9,313 0 319

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 9,313

 9,313

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2002 .02

 28.36

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### §1300m–2. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 103–454, title III, §304, Nov. 2, 1994, 108 Stat. 4794, which related to establishment of a plan for economic development for the tribe, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7985

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ADDO JAYSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CR-92-261-WMN, CA-01-1822-WMN)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: April 2, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Addo Jayson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Addo Jayson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Jayson’s notice

of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded sixty days after entry of the district

court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and

jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June

28, 2001. Jayson’s notice of appeal was filed at the earliest on

November 11, 2001. Because Jayson failed to file a timely notice

of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal

period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 832.00

 831.68

 832.23

 831.97

 831.87

 831.57

 831.14

 830.59

 830.64

 830.63

 830.56

 830.49

 830.46

 830.80

 831.24

 831.60

 831.42

 831.37

 831.10

 830.70

 830.78

 830.85

 830.82

 830.78

 830.69

 830.55

 830.44

 830.20

 830.03

 829.83

 829.65

 39.44

 39.08

 39.70

 39.40

 39.29

 38.95

 38.47

 37.86

 37.91

 37.90

 37.82

 37.75

 37.71

 38.09

 38.58

 38.99

 38.78

 38.73

 38.42

 37.98

 38.07

 38.15

 38.11

 38.07

 37.97

 37.81

 37.69

 37.43

 37.24

 37.02

 36.82

STORAGE

-0.71

-0.36

+0.62

-0.30

-0.11

-0.34

-0.48

-0.61

+0.06

-0.01

-0.08

-0.08

-0.03

+0.38

+0.49

+0.41

-0.20

-0.06

-0.30

-0.45

+0.09

+0.08

-0.03

-0.05

-0.10

-0.16

-0.12

-0.27

-0.19

-0.22

-0.20

CHANGE

813

753

1,315

915

665

526

452

387

382

347

317

316

336

543

601

558

594

667

543

473

399

394

339

331

304

277

293

220

259

243

254

INFLOW

 489

 254

 318

 383

 39

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

SPILL

 681

 680

 681

 681

 681

 681

 680

 679

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 680

 680

 680

 680

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

 338

OUTLET

 0

 0

 2

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 1

 0

 3

 2

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 3

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .07

 .02

 .00

 .08

 .05

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .06

 .05

 .06

 .09

 .04

 .03

 .07

 .05

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .01

INCHES

 .41

 .34

 .27

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .26

 .00

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .05

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2011 RUN DATE: 02/01/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -3.33 14,816 14,586 1,873 34 1.01 1.69

ACRE-FEET -3,330 29,388 28,931 3,715 67

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 3,715

OUTLET

TOTAL

 28,931

 32,646

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.69

JULY 1, 2010 12.07

 40.15

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         155,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,172,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,268,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,137,224
<PP&E>                                       7,322,963
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,133,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,586,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,312,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,525
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,807,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,586,616
<SALES>                                     22,351,818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,351,818
<CGS>                                       18,628,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,949,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               273,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                221,417
<INCOME-TAX>                                    88,567
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            132,850
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   132,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of
Waterstone Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Richard C.
Larson


Richard
C. Larson


Chief
Financial Officer


March 11,
2009
### §§21a to 25. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XV, §1532(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1732

Section 21a, act Aug. 2, 1946, ch. 756, §11, 60 Stat. 854, related to maintenance and operation of Naval Home.

Section 21b, act June 26, 1934, ch. 756, §9, 48 Stat. 1229, abolished Navy Pension Fund and authorized appropriations for maintenance, operation, and improvement of Naval Home.

Section 22, act June 30, 1914, ch. 130, 38 Stat. 398, related to disposition of moneys of deceased inmates of Naval Home.

Section 23, act June 30, 1914, ch. 130, 38 Stat. 398, related to disposition of pensions of beneficiaries in Naval Home.

Section 24, act Mar. 4, 1917, ch. 180, 39 Stat. 1175, provided that moneys derived from certain sales and rentals be turned into naval pension fund.

Section 25, act Aug. 22, 1912, ch. 335, 37 Stat. 334, related to employment of beneficiaries in service of Naval Home.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective one year after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 1541(a) of Pub. L. 101–510, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 401 of this title.
Table 23
                                   U. S. Department of Interior - Bureau of Reclamation
                                           Central Valley Operations Office

                                        Madera Canal and Millerton Lake
                                                     2010
Monthly Deliveries in AF

    Water Users        Jan     Feb     Mar     Apr     May     Jun     Jul     Aug     Sep     Oct     Nov     Dec   Total

MADERA CANAL

Chowchilla WD             0       0       0   19391   34074   31090   28033   29057    8766       0       0       0  150411
Madera ID                 0       0    1249   18060   20815   25470   26956   45805   16682   15214       0       0  170251
Soquel (Madera non-       0       0       4       4       4       4       4       4       8       8       7       6      53

Total                     0       0    1253   37455   54893   56564   54993   74866   25456   15222       7       6  320715


MILLERTON LAKE

County of Madera          2       1       1       1       2       3       4       6       4       2       1       1      28
Fresno County # 18        8       5       6       7      10      16      19      18      14      10       7       5     125
Gravelly Ford WD          0       0       0     910    2146    2871     351     250       0     282       0       0    6810
                                 .
Total                    10       6       7     918    2158    2890     374     274      18     294       8       6    6963


*  Delivery data is based on District turn-out readings and may include water in addition to water service contract deliveries.
#### Scott PROCTER et al., Appellants, v. John BAIRD, et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky.

June 1, 1943.

Oscar M. Smith for appellants.

I. G. Mason for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal denied; judgment affirmed.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Case Studies in Equal Pay for Women

              																	United States. Women's Bureau					 and 	Brilla, Mary H. (Mary Hellen). 						*Case Studies in Equal Pay for Women*,										September 1951,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/252,			accessed on September 11, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER