alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

DAY

 5,841

 6,953

 5,683

 5,856

 6,258

 3,943

 8,403

 6,132

 6,088

 5,072

 4,755

 5,979

 6,290

 6,903

 7,304

 172,567

 169,487

 167,618

 164,636

 161,968

 159,814

 155,569

 155,774

 153,810

 151,904

 149,127

 146,188

 144,558

 143,306

 142,698

 351,592

 353,560

 356,699

 359,508

 361,774

 366,243

 366,028

 368,094

 370,102

 373,024

 376,118

 377,833

 379,152

 379,791

 379,998

 1,089,093

 1,095,187

 1,104,910

 1,113,612

 1,120,633

 1,134,474

 1,133,807

 1,140,209

 1,146,426

 1,155,481

 1,165,064

 1,170,376

 1,174,460

 1,176,441

 1,177,080

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: July 27, 2000

 178,408

 176,440

 173,301

 170,492

 168,226

 163,757

 163,972

 161,906

 159,898

 156,976

 153,882

 152,167

 150,848

 150,209

 150,002

 210,907

 204,813

 195,090

 186,388

 179,367

 165,526

 166,193

 159,791

 153,574

 144,519

 134,936

 129,624

 125,540

 123,559

 122,920

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 1,090,839

 1,105,782

 1,120,725

 1,135,668

 1,150,611

 1,165,554

 1,180,497

 1,195,440

 1,210,383

 1,225,326

 1,240,269

 1,255,212

 1,270,155

 1,285,098

 1,300,041

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE.

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 181,649
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group, Subcommittee G-Education, Review of K01, K05, K07, K22, K23 and K24 Applications.                    

*Date:*                         October 26-27, 2004.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Sheraton Suites Alexandria, 601 North Saint Asaph Street, Alexandria, VA 22314.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ilda M. McKenna, Scientific Review Administrator, Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8111, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-7481,                         *mckennai@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 16, 2004.

LaVerne Y. Stringfield,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 04-21439 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
§ 2.19 When may the bureau extend the basic time limit? ( a ) The bureau may extend the basic time limit, if unusual circumstances exist, by notifying you in writing of: ( 1 ) The unusual circumstances involved; and
( 2 ) The date by which it expects to complete processing the request.
( b ) If the processing time will extend beyond a total of 30 workdays, the bureau will: ( 1 ) Give you an opportunity to limit the scope of the request or agree to an alternative time period for processing; and
( 2 ) Make available the FOIA Public Liaison (see § 2.66 of this part) to assist in resolving any disputes between you and the bureau, and notify you of your right to seek dispute resolution from the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS).
( c ) If the bureau extends the time limit under this section and you do not receive a response in accordance with § 2.16(a) in that time period, you may consider the request denied and file an appeal in accordance with the procedures in § 2.59.
( d ) Your refusal to reasonably modify the scope of a request or arrange an alternative time frame for processing a request after being given the opportunity to do so may be considered for litigation purposes as a factor when determining whether exceptional circumstances exist.
[77 FR 76902, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 11128, Mar. 3, 2016; 81 FR 92694, Dec. 20, 2016; 84 FR 61827, Nov. 14, 2019]
#### Edith M. BELKNAP and Kentucky Trust Company, Executor of the Estate of William B. Belknap, Deceased, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

Civ. A. No. 5189.

United States District Court W. D. Kentucky, at Louisville.

June 28, 1967.

*338William D. Grubbs, Woodward, Hob-son & Fulton, Louisville, Ky., for plaintiffs.

Ernest W. Rivers, U. S. Atty., for defendant.

BROOKS, Chief Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This matter having come on for trial before the Court on May 2, 1967 and the Court, having heard the evidence and considered the pleadings, stipulation and authorities submitted by the parties, finds the facts and states the conclusions of law as follows:

1. All of the jurisdictional prerequisites have been met and the Court has jurisdiction of the parties and of this action.

2. The Kentucky Trust Company is the duly appointed, qualified and acting executor of the Estate of William B. Belknap, Deceased.

3. The limestone in question was a capital asset in the hands of the Belknaps and held for more than six months prior to the agreement in question, the actual removal of the limestone in question and the taxable years in controversy.

4. The Belknaps, in disposing of the limestone in question, did not intend to, or in fact, retain an economic interest in the limestone removed by Derby Construction Company under the agreement dated February 1, 1956, the subsequent modifications, and dealings thereunder. The Belknaps were paid a fixed price per unit removed and did not share in any profit or income derived by Derby Construction Company from the resale of the limestone. The true substance of the transaction, and not the form, is determinative. Linehan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 297 F.2d 276 (CA 1); Crowell Land & Mineral Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 242 F.2d 864 (CA 5); Gowans v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 246 F.2d 448 (CA 9); Barker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 250 F.2d 195 (CA 2); United States v. White, 311 F.2d 399 (CA 10); Turner v. United States, 226 F.Supp. 970 (D.C.S.D., Me.); Peeler v. United States, 238 F.Supp. 640 (D.C.M.D., Ga.); Brown v. United States, 66-1 USTC § 9153 (D.C.E.D. Ark.); Green v. United States, 65-2 USTC § 9460 (D.C.M.D., Fla.); and Gitzinger v. United States, 267 F.Supp. 944 (D.C.S.D., Ohio).

5. Since no economic interest was retained, under the authorities referred to above, the payments received by the Belknaps during the taxable years in controversy were long term capital gains and not ordinary income.

6. The Belknaps thus erroneously over paid the taxes in question, and plaintiffs are entitled to recover back the sum of $33,108.01 together with *339statutory interest thereon from the dates of payment and plaintiffs’ complaint shall be considered as so amended as to the amount.

It is so ordered and counsel for plaintiff will submit appropriate judgment in accordance herewith.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              sep-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 oct-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                         384,613
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,697,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,003,568
<INVENTORY>                                    490,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,086,792
<PP&E>                                         5,055,773
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,029,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,451,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,321,606
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       337,456
<OTHER-SE>                                     902,734
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,240,190
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               9,681,398
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,950,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               498,330
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               387,237
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             368,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                476,727
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            476,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   476,727
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .07
        


</TABLE>
§ 2.281 What is the Department's policy on granting requests for employee testimony or Department records? ( a ) Except for proceedings covered by § 2.80(c) and (d), it is the Department's general policy not to allow its employees to testify or to produce Department records either upon request or by subpoena. However, if you request in writing, the Department will consider whether to allow testimony or production of records under this subpart. The Department's policy ensures the orderly execution of its mission and programs while not impeding any proceeding inappropriately.
( b ) No Department employee may testify or produce records in any proceeding to which this subpart applies unless authorized by the Department under §§ 2.80 through 2.90 *United States ex rel. Touhy* v. *Ragen,* 340 U.S. 462 (1951).
### §116. Indians 18 years of age to have right to receipt for annuity

All Indians, when they shall arrive at the age of eighteen years, shall have the right to receive and receipt for all annuity money that may be due or become due to them, if not otherwise incapacitated under the regulations of the Indian Office.

(Mar. 1, 1899, ch. 324, §8, 30 Stat. 947.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 2.280 What does this subpart cover? ( a ) This subpart describes how the Department of the Interior (including all its bureaus and offices) responds to requests or subpoenas for: ( 1 ) Testimony by employees in State, territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings concerning information acquired while performing official duties or because of an employee's official status;
( 2 ) Testimony by employees in Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States is not a party concerning information acquired while performing official duties or because of an employee's official status;
( 3 ) Testimony by employees in any judicial or administrative proceeding in which the United States, while not a party, has a direct and substantial interest;
( 4 ) Official records or certification of such records for use in Federal, State, territorial or Tribal judicial, legislative or administrative proceedings.
( b ) In this subpart, “employee” means a current or former Department employee, including a contract or special government employee.
( c ) This subpart does not apply to: ( 1 ) Congressional requests or subpoenas for testimony or records;
( 2 ) Federal court civil proceedings in which the United States is a party;
( 3 ) Federal administrative proceedings;
( 4 ) Federal, State and Tribal criminal court proceedings;
( 5 ) Employees who voluntarily testify, while on their own time or in approved leave status, as private citizens as to facts or events that are not related to the official business of the Department. The employee must state for the record that the testimony represents the employee's own views and is not necessarily the official position of the Department. *See* 5 CFR §§ 2635.702(b), 2635.807 (b).
( 6 ) Testimony by employees as expert witnesses on subjects outside their official duties, except that they must obtain prior approval if required by § 2.90.
( d ) This subpart does not affect the rights of any individual or the procedures for obtaining records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), Privacy Act, or statutes governing the certification of official records. The Department FOIA and Privacy Act regulations are found at 43 CFR part 2, subparts B and D.
( e ) Nothing in this subpart is intended to impede the appropriate disclosure under applicable laws of Department information to Federal, State, territorial, Tribal, or foreign law enforcement, prosecutorial, or regulatory agencies.
( f ) This subpart only provides guidance for the internal operations of the Department, and neither creates nor is intended to create any enforceable right or benefit against the United States.
### §6991. Accession of Taiwan to the WTO

It is the sense of the Congress that—

(1) immediately upon approval by the General Council of the WTO of the terms and conditions of the accession of the People's Republic of China to the WTO, the United States representative to the WTO should request that the General Council of the WTO consider Taiwan's accession to the WTO as the next order of business of the Council during the same session; and

(2) the United States should be prepared to aggressively counter any effort by any WTO member, upon the approval of the General Council of the WTO of the terms and conditions of the accession of the People's Republic of China to the WTO, to block the accession of Taiwan to the WTO.

(Pub. L. 106–286, div. B, title VI, §601, Oct. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 906.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 824.99

 824.91

 824.87

 824.84

 824.77

 824.70

 824.63

 824.55

 824.50

 824.44

 824.36

 834.30

 824.24

 824.17

 824.12

 824.06

 824.01

 823.95

 823.90

 823.23

 823.75

 823.68

 823.62

 823.57

 823.53

 823.50

 823.56

 823.62

 823.69

 823.91

 823.66

 31.93

 31.85

 31.81

 31.78

 31.71

 31.64

 31.57

 31.49

 31.44

 31.38

 31.30

 42.09

 31.18

 31.11

 31.06

 31.00

 30.95

 30.89

 30.85

 30.19

 30.70

 30.63

 30.57

 30.52

 30.48

 30.45

 30.51

 30.57

 30.64

 30.86

 30.61

STORAGE

-0.06

-0.08

-0.04

-0.03

-0.07

-0.07

-0.07

-0.08

-0.05

-0.06

-0.08

+10.79

-10.91

-0.07

-0.05

-0.06

-0.05

-0.06

-0.05

-0.66

+0.51

-0.07

-0.06

-0.05

-0.04

-0.03

+0.06

+0.06

+0.07

+0.22

-0.25

CHANGE

26

17

38

40

25

23

25

18

34

29

20

5,501

-5,442

24

34

28

21

15

21

-330

303

12

18

-20

27

33

77

75

78

155

250

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 42

 42

 42

SPILL

 55

 55

 55

 55

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 42

 42

 42

 0

 42

 42

 42

 0

 42

 42

 42

 42

 0

 0

 330

OUTLET

 2

 2

 3

 0

 6

 3

 5

 3

 4

 4

 5

 5

 5

 4

 4

 3

 4

 3

 4

 1

 4

 5

 6

 5

 5

 6

 5

 3

 1

 4

 3

C.F.S.

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .01

 .18

 .08

 .16

 .10

 .12

 .14

 .17

 .13

 .16

 .13

 .13

 .10

 .13

 .10

 .13

 .04

 .14

 .16

 .20

 .15

 .15

 .18

 .16

 .11

 .04

 .12

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .34

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .22

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MARCH 2022 RUN DATE: 04/13/2022

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.39 1,175 970 786 117 3.72 .71

ACRE-FEET -1,390 2,331 1,924 1,559 232

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,559

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,924

 3,483

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .71

JULY 1, 2021 10.93

 31.99

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 10.65
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Annual Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David J. Prystash, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of
the Companies.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David J. Prystash  
|David J. Prystash      
|Chief Financial Officer
|February 17, 2011
San Luis Obispo County APCD 214-1 8/10/93

RULE 214. NOTIFICATION (Adopted 11/5/91; Revised 8/10/93)

A. APPLICABILITY

This Rule specifies the cases in which notification shall be provided of the Air Pollution Control Officer's preliminary decision to grant or deny an Authority to Construct, or issue

a Certificate of Emission Reduction Credit. In add ition, this Rule specifies the process by

which such notification shall be made.

B. REQUIREMENTS

1. The Air Pollution Control Officer (APCO) shall publ ish a notice, as specified in subsection B.3, of any preliminary decision to gran t or deny an Authority to Construct for any new, replacement, modified, or re located emissions unit where the increase in the potential to emit would exceed the limits in Table B-1.

Table B-1.

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) 100.0 lb/day Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) 100.0 lb/day Sulfur Oxides (SOx) 100.0 lb/day Particulate Matter (PM-10) 80.0 lb/day Carbon Monoxide 550.0 lb/day

2. The APCO shall publish a notice, as specified in su bsection B.3, of any preliminary decision to certify emission reduction credits where the amount of such credit would exceed any of the limits specifie d in Table B-1.

3. Any notice of a preliminary decision required to be published pursuant to

subsections B.1 or B.2 shall:

a. Be published in at least one newspaper of general c irculation in San Luis Obispo County, by no later than 10 days after such preliminary decision.

b. Include the location where the public may inspect t he information required to be made available pursuant to subsection B.4.

c. Provide at least 30 days from the date of publicati on for the public to submit written comments regarding such preliminary decision.

4. The APCO shall, by no later than the date of public ation, make available for public inspection at the District office the inform ation submitted by the applicant and the APCO's supporting analysis for any prelimin ary decision subject to theSan Luis Obispo County APCD 214-2 8/10/93 notification requirements of subsections B.1 or B.2 . Information which contains

trade secrets shall be handled in accordance with R ule 112 of these Rules.

5. The APCO shall, by no later than the date of public ation, provide to the California Air Resources Board (ARB) and the U.S. Environmenta l Protection Agency (EPA) a copy of any notification made pursuant to s ubsections B.1 or B.2, and the supporting data and analysis relating to any such p reliminary decision.

6. The APCO shall consider any comments received durin g the 30 day comment period. If during the 30 day comment period the AP CO receives a written request

from either ARB or EPA to defer the APCO's final de cision pending the requesting agency's review of the application, then the APCO shall defer the final decision for a period of 30 days from the date of s uch request.

7. The APCO shall provide written notification of the final decision to grant or deny any such Authority to Construct or Certificate of E mission Reduction Credits to any person and/or agency which submitted comments d uring the comment period.
EXHIBIT 32.2
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                MARWICH II, LTD.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Schumacher, President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
----------------------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
May 8, 2006