alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §277d–34. American-Mexican Boundary Treaty, authorization for carrying out treaty provisions; investigations; land acquisition, purposes; damages, repair or compensation

In connection with the treaty between the United States of America and the United Mexican States to resolve pending boundary differences and maintain the Rio Grande and the Colorado River as the international boundary between the United States of America and the United Mexican States, signed November 23, 1970, (hereafter in this Act referred to as the "treaty"), the Secretary of State, acting through the United States Commissioner, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States, and Mexico (hereafter in this Act referred to as the "Commissioner"), is authorized—

(1) to conduct technical and other investigations relating to—

(A) the demarcation, mapping, monumentation, channel relocation, rectification, improvement, stabilization, and other matters relating to the preservation of the river boundaries between the United States and Mexico;

(B) the establishment and delimitation of the maritime boundaries in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Pacific Ocean;

(C) water resources; and

(D) the sanitation and the prevention of pollution;

(2) to acquire by donation, purchase, or condemnation, all lands or interests in lands required—

(A) for transfer to Mexico as provided in the treaty;

(B) for construction of that portion of new river channels and the adjoining levees in the territory of the United States;

(C) to preserve the Rio Grande and the Colorado River as the boundary by preventing the construction of works which may cause deflection or obstruction of the normal flow of the rivers or of their floodflows; and

(D) for relocation of any structure or facility, public or private, the relocation of which, in the judgment of the Commissioner, is necessitated by the project; and

(3) to remove, modify, or repair the damages caused to Mexico by works constructed in the United States which the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, as determined have an adverse effect on Mexico, or to compensate Mexico for such damages.

(Pub. L. 92–549, title I, §101, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1161.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, means Pub. L. 92–549, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1161, which enacted sections 277d–34 to 277d–42 of this title and amended section 1322 of Title 19, Customs Duties. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 92–549, §1, Oct. 25, 1972, 86 Stat. 1161, provided: "That this Act [enacting this section and sections 277d–35 to 277d–42 of this title and amending section 1322 of Title 19, Customs Duties] may be cited as the 'American-Mexican Boundary Treaty Act of 1972'."
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 17.280 Enforcement procedures.

The compliance and enforcement provisions applicable to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to this subpart. These procedures are found in 43 CFR part 17, subpart A, §§ 17.5-17.11 and 43 CFR part 4, subpart I.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.61

 130.64

 130.67

 130.69

 130.64

 130.57

 130.77

 130.71

 130.53

 130.68

 130.59

 130.52

 130.33

 130.45

 130.40

 130.32

 130.18

 130.10

 130.01

 129.89

 129.97

 129.65

 129.58

 130.78

 129.64

 130.10

 130.26

 130.47

 130.62

 130.55

 130.66

 645

 649

 652

 655

 649

 641

 664

 657

 636

 654

 643

 635

 615

 628

 623

 614

 599

 591

 582

 569

 578

 546

 539

 665

 545

 591

 608

 630

 646

 639

 651

STORAGE

-24

+4

+3

+3

-6

-8

+23

-7

-21

+18

-11

-8

-20

+13

-5

-9

-15

-8

-9

-13

+9

-32

-7

+126

-120

+46

+17

+22

+16

-7

+12

CHANGE

225

237

233

223

204

199

187

185

219

265

278

267

255

253

258

266

267

284

297

290

255

228

271

336

155

123

49

42

39

71

120

INFLOW

 27

 29

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 71

 88

PUTAH

 209

 205

 200

 190

 177

 172

 144

 157

 199

 225

 253

 240

 234

 215

 229

 240

 244

 257

 272

 266

 219

 214

 244

 242

 185

 69

 10

 0

 0

 3

 25

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .19

 .16

 .16

 .24

 .13

 .18

 .37

 .42

 .29

 .22

 .19

 .22

 .26

 .21

 .50

 .30

 .26

 .18

 .13

 .18

 .19

 .15

 .20

 .08

 .15

 .19

 .10

 .16

 .22

 .24

 .34

INCHES

 .00

 .05

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 RUN DATE: 11/05/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -18 6,581 5,539 1,025 27 6.81 .07

ACRE-FEET -18 13,053 10,987 2,033 54

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,033

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 10,987

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .07

JULY 1, 2018 .08

 669

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = .07
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

         I, Howard F. Hill, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of RF
Industries, Ltd. ("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date:   September 14, 2005                            /s/ Howard F. Hill
                                                      ------------------
                                                       Howard F. Hill
                                                       Acting Chief Financial
                                                       Officer
ex_130414.htm


Exhibit 4.15


 


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST


OF


AIR T FUNDING


 


 


This Certificate of Trust of AIR T FUNDING (the “Trust”), is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned trustees, to form a statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. Section 3801 et seq.) (the “Act”).


 


	
			1.

				
			NAME. The name of the trust formed hereby is Air T Funding.

			



 


	
			2.

				
			DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware is Delaware Trust Company, 251 Little Falls Dr., Wilmington, DE 19808, Attn: Corporate Trust.

			



 


	
			3.

				
			EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon its filing.

			



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being all of the trustees of the Trust, have executed this Certificate of Trust in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.


 


	
			 

				
			Delaware Trust Company, not in its individual


			capacity but solely as Property Trustee and


			Delaware Trustee

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			By: 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			Name:


			Title:

				
			 

			
	
			 

				
			 

				
			 

				
			 

			
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Mark Jundt, as Administrative Trustee	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Brett Reynolds, as Administrative Trustee
[slickrockagreement002.jpg]

[slickrockagreement004.jpg]

[slickrockagreement006.jpg]

[slickrockagreement008.jpg]

[slickrockagreement010.jpg]

[slickrockagreement012.jpg]

[slickrockagreement014.jpg]

[slickrockagreement016.jpg]

[slickrockagreement018.jpg]

[slickrockagreement020.jpg]

[slickrockagreement022.jpg]

[slickrockagreement024.jpg]

[slickrockagreement026.jpg]

[slickrockagreement028.jpg]

[slickrockagreement030.jpg]
#### Nathan Campbell, appellant, v. Peter J. Youngson et al., appellees.

Filed December 5, 1908.

No. 14,847.

Rehearing of case reported in 80 Neb. 322.

Barnes, C. J.

After a careful examination of our former opinion in this case (80 Neb. 322), the briefs and the arguments of counsel on the rehearing, and an extended review of the drainage law of 1881 (laws 1881, ch. 51), in the light of its provisions and subsequent legislation covering kindred subjects, we are of opinion that by the act of 1881 it was not intended to embrace the subject of overflowed lands; and especially is this so where the overflow is caused, as in the case at bar, by surface water. That this was the view taken by the legislature is made clear by the acts of 1905 *744and 1907, which fully provide for just such a situation as arises in the case at bar.

We can add nothing to the reasons given in our former opinion for enjoining the defendants from proceeding further under the present petition. The petitioner and other interested persons may, if they so desire, organize a .drainage district according to the provisions of chapter 153 of the laws of 1907, which are ample and in every way sufficient to enable them to change the channel of Dry creek and Whiskey slough, and divert the waters of those streams at the point in controversy by making a new outlet to the Platte river, and, if necessary, by damming up the old channel of Whiskey slough at and below (lie point of diversion.

For the foregoing reasons, we are of opinion that we should adhere to our former judgment.

Judgment accordingly.

Reese, J., dissents.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       15
### §8. Repealed. Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 645

Section, act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §7, 43 Stat. 141, related to recommissioning diplomatic and consular officers on July 1, 1924.
###### Editorial Note on Part 17

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

#### § 17.511 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the agency head finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
. ~ 

p 

SERVED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 

··;;:::).~r.rl·uEf11 T OF _ •.... r 1 ,l IV! .. \J . 

' ...... 1,"1)-\i\i,) ' ' l('POR1-ATIO~J . f' 

!•,(\k'C_:·r ()Dr/::lllf/Q(\1(' . _.;i,J; \L.I . I t: lJ \ I iV 

za1z I I t\ CJ: 31 

US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

'·· OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

·WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

.ICE COLD, INC. · .. ,~· .. 

·FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS No.FAA-2011-1288 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

i#·J' 

'• "· 

,: ... 

,. ~· "'•-"· 

.. ........... : ·~:--:,j 

... '.... J·::.: .~ 

...,. ' ,, 

¥' 

'·'· ·..,'!, .• 

.. .. . 

., 

.... 

" 

.. ,. .. 

.. .. 

' 

. ... 

... 

'-· ~.:' . On November 29; 2011, the Fed€ral Aviation Administration (hereinafter,re!erred to as 

"Complainant") filed a Complaint in this matter. Ice Cold, Inc. (hereinafter· referred to as 

. "Respondent'') had earlier filed a Request for Hearing. · • ~ · · '_, 

On September 7;2012, Complainant withdrew its Complaint, citing settiemen:t, and asked ., that the case be dismissed With prejudice. · ·· .... · 

.. 

14 C.P.R.§ 13.£15 ~ates: "At any time before or during a hearing, ali ~g~pcy attorney 

may withdraw a co.mplaint or party may.withdraw a request for a hearing-Without th€ 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws' the ..complaint or 

aparty,.'Y,ithgra.w~.tJi~ regtJe~>t forahearing.and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." "" 

, 

.... \ . .,· 

~-· 

.,. 

__ .~. 

·•. 
,.. 

2 "" 

1. Complainant's Withdrawal of Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard 

&-~Q-~ C. Goodwin · 

Attachment- Servi~e Ust 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

., 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC~430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Jim Wolgemuth, President 

Ice Cold, Inc., Respondent 

2020 Belmont 

Anchorage, AK 99517 

ONE COPY 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Alaskan Region, AAL~ 7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5269 

FAX: 907-271~2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S,E.(E.U:JlQ) 

Washington, DC 20590 . 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 bega1S.1fl:ff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-1288 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

.. 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.162 Approved certification.

If temporary agricultural labor certification is granted, the CO will send a Final Determination notice and a copy of the certified *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and job order to the employer and a copy, if applicable, to the employer's agent or attorney using an electronic method(s) designated by the OFLC Administrator. For employers permitted to file by mail as set forth in § 655.130(c), the CO will send the Final Determination notice and a copy of the certified *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and job order by means normally assuring next day delivery. The CO will send the certified *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and job order, including any approved modifications, directly to USCIS using an electronic method(s) designated by the OFLC Administrator.
#### § 1882.5-8 Additional terms and conditions.

The Director may impose any terms and conditions that he determines necessary to assure the achievement of the purpose of the loans made under this subsection.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4301 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to search all public records 

to determine if an alien is inadmissible to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. BUCHANAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to search 

all public records to determine if an alien is inadmissible 

to the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT TO SEARCH RECORDS OF 

4 ALIENS APPLYING FOR ADMISSION TO THE 

5 UNITED STATES. 

6 The Secretary of Homeland Security shall search all 

7 public records, including Internet sites and social media 

8 profiles, to determine if an alien applying for admission 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4301 IH

1 to the United States is inadmissible under section 212 of 

2 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182). 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Harriet E. Weinstein et al., Appellant, and John S. Kroese, Intervener, Appellant, v. Sosthenes Behn et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Settle order on notice. Present — Glennon, Dore, Callahan and Shientag, JJ. [See 272 App. Div. 1045.]
September 2023

STORAGE 

1000 ACRE-FEET COMPUTED*

RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

48.04

1 839.16 48.03 -0.01 35 0 30 12 0.31 0.00

2 839.18 48.05 0.03 46 0 30 3 0.07 0.45

3 839.19 48.06 0.01 41 0 30 5 0.13 0.00

4 839.21 48.09 0.03 49 0 30 6 0.14 0.00

5 839.23 48.11 0.03 51 0 30 8 0.21 0.00

6 838.74 47.50 -0.62 16 288 30 10 0.24 0.00

7 838.22 46.84 -0.65 26 315 30 10 0.26 0.00

8 837.69 46.19 -0.66 25 318 30 9 0.23 0.00

9 837.14 45.51 -0.68 16 318 30 10 0.26 0.00

10 836.59 44.84 -0.67 25 323 30 11 0.28 0.00

11 836.02 44.14 -0.69 22 330 30 10 0.26 0.00

12 835.45 43.46 -0.69 20 330 25 11 0.28 0.00

13 834.85 42.74 -0.72 17 342 25 10 0.26 0.00

14 834.28 42.07 -0.67 38 342 25 10 0.27 0.00

15 833.68 41.37 -0.70 25 342 25 12 0.32 0.00

16 833.06 40.65 -0.72 15 341 25 11 0.29 0.00

17 832.45 39.95 -0.70 22 341 25 9 0.24 0.00

18 831.82 39.23 -0.72 13 341 25 8 0.22 0.00

19 831.20 38.54 -0.70 22 341 25 8 0.21 0.00

20 831.11 38.43 -0.10 36 55 25 7 0.19 0.00

21 831.11 38.43 0.00 34 0 25 9 0.25 0.00

22 831.10 38.42 -0.01 29 0 25 10 0.27 0.00

23 831.10 38.42 0.00 33 0 25 8 0.22 0.00

24 831.10 38.42 0.00 30 0 25 5 0.15 0.00

25 831.11 38.43 0.01 36 0 25 5 0.15 0.00

26 831.11 38.43 0.00 29 0 25 4 0.11 0.00

27 831.12 38.45 0.01 37 0 25 6 0.16 0.00

28 831.13 38.46 0.01 37 0 25 6 0.17 0.00

29 831.14 38.47 0.01 38 0 25 7 0.19 0.00

30 831.14 38.47 0.00 30 0 25 5 0.13 0.00

TOTALS -9.57 893 4,667 805 245 6.47 0.45

ACRE-FEET -9,570 1,771 9,257 1,597 486

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 9,257

Spill 1,597

Total 10,854

Precipitation

This month = 0.45

October 01, 2022 

To date =

28.38

Historical Archive and Report Database

Stony Gorge Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 10/10/2023
July 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

1,632

1 731.46 1,638 6 3 0 0

2 731.60 1,644 6 3 0 0

3 731.69 1,648 4 2 0 0

4 731.80 1,652 4 2 0 0

5 731.91 1,657 5 3 0 0

6 732.01 1,661 4 2 0 0

7 732.12 1,666 5 3 0 0

8 732.23 1,671 5 3 0 0

9 732.40 1,679 8 4 0 0

10 732.63 1,689 10 5 0 0

11 732.84 1,698 9 5 0 0

12 733.02 1,706 8 4 0 0

13 733.17 1,712 6 3 0 0

14 733.34 1,720 8 4 0 0

15 733.47 1,726 6 3 0 0

16 733.60 1,731 5 3 0 0

17 733.66 1,734 3 2 0 0

18 733.73 1,737 3 2 0 0

19 733.83 1,742 5 3 0 0

20 733.93 1,746 4 2 0 0

21 734.02 1,750 4 2 0 0

22 734.07 1,752 2 1 0 0

23 734.13 1,755 3 2 0 0

24 734.21 1,758 3 2 0 0

25 734.28 1,762 4 2 0 0

26 734.35 1,765 3 2 0 0

27 734.48 1,771 6 3 0 0

28 734.58 1,775 4 2 0 0

29 734.62 1,777 2 1 0 0

30 734.66 1,779 2 1 0 0

31 734.70 1,781 2 1 0 0

TOTALS 149 80 0 0

ACRE-FEET 149 159 0 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 0

Spill 0

Total 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 8/10/2023