Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2012 / Notices 25683 

1We note that there are additional companies for 

which review requests were withdrawn within the 

90 day period. See Letter to the Department from 

Petitioners, ‘‘Honey from the People’s Republic of 

China: Petitioners’ Partial Withdrawal of Request 

for Tenth Administrative Review’’ (April 16, 2012). 

However, because these companies do not have a 

separate rate from a prior segment of this 

proceeding, we intend to address the disposition of 

these withdrawal requests in the preliminary results 

of this review. 

Background 

On January 24, 2012, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

initiation of an administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on Honey 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(‘‘PRC’’) covering the period December 

1, 2010, through November 30, 2011. 

See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 77 FR 4759 (January 24, 2012). 

On April 16, 2012, the American 

Honey Producers Association and Sioux 

Honey Association (collectively 

‘‘Petitioners’’) withdrew their request 

for an administrative review for the 

following companies: Anhui Honghui 

Foodstuff (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 

Bloom International Trading Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Taiside Trading Co., Ltd., 

Tianjin Eulia Honey Co., Ltd., and 

Wuhan Bee Healthy Co., Ltd. Petitioners 

were the only party to request a review 

of these companies. 

Partial Rescission 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if a party 

who requested the review withdraws 

the request within 90 days of the date 

of publication of notice of initiation of 

the requested review. Petitioners’ 

request was submitted within the 90 day 

period and, thus, is timely. Because 

Petitioners’ withdrawal of requests for 

review is timely and because no other 

party requested a review of the 

aforementioned companies, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

we are partially rescinding this review 

with respect to Anhui Honghui 

Foodstuff (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 

Bloom International Trading Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Taiside Trading Co., Ltd., 

Tianjin Eulia Honey Co., Ltd., and 

Wuhan Bee Healthy Co., Ltd.1

Assessment Rates 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Anhui Honghui 

Foodstuff (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 

Bloom International Trading Co., Ltd., 

Shanghai Taiside Trading Co., Ltd., 

Tianjin Eulia Honey Co., Ltd., and 

Wuhan Bee Healthy Co., Ltd., all have 

separate rates from a prior segment of 

this proceeding; therefore, antidumping 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the cash deposit of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(2). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers for whom this review is 

being rescinded, as of the publication 

date of this notice, of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: April 25, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10450 Filed 4–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is 

automatically initiating a five-year 

review (‘‘Sunset Review’’) of the 

antidumping duty order listed below. 

The International Trade Commission 

(‘‘the Commission’’) is publishing 

concurrently with this notice its notice 

of Institution of Five-Year Review which 

covers the same orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The 

Department official identified in the 

Initiation of Review section below at 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

For information from the Commission 

contact Mary Messer, Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission at (202) 205–3193. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department’s procedures for the 

conduct of Sunset Reviews are set forth 

in its Procedures for Conducting FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Orders, 63 FR 13516 (March 20, 1998) 

and 70 FR 62061 (October 28, 2005). 

Guidance on methodological or 

analytical issues relevant to the 

Department’s conduct of Sunset 

Reviews is set forth in the Department’s 

Policy Bulletin 98.3—Policies Regarding 

the Conduct of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Policy 

Bulletin, 63 FR 18871 (April 16, 1998), 

and in Antidumping Proceedings: 

Calculation of the Weighted-Average 

Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate 

in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 

8101 (February 14, 2012). 

Initiation of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(c), we are initiating the Sunset 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

25684 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 1, 2012 / Notices 

1 In comments made on the interim final sunset 

regulations, a number of parties stated that the 

proposed five-day period for rebuttals to 

substantive responses to a notice of initiation was 

insufficient. This requirement was retained in the 

final sunset regulations at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(4). As 

provided in 19 CFR 351.302(b), however, the 

Department will consider individual requests to 

extend that five-day deadline based upon a showing 

of good cause. 

Review of the following antidumping 

duty order: 

DOC Case No. ITC Case No. Country Product Department contact 

A–570–1104 ...... 731–TA–1103 ... China ...................... Activated Cabron (1st Review) ............... Jennifer Moats, (202) 482–5047. 

Filing Information 

As a courtesy, we are making 

information related to Sunset 

proceedings, including copies of the 

pertinent statue and Department’s 

regulations, the Department schedule 

for Sunset Reviews, a listing of past 

revocations and continuations, and 

current service lists, available to the 

public on the Department’s Internet 

Web site at the following address: 

‘‘http://ia.ita.doc.gov/sunset/.’’ All 

submissions in these Sunset Reviews 

must be filed in accordance with the 

Department’s regulations regarding 

format, translation, and service of 

documents. These rules can be found at 

19 CFR 351.303. 

This notice serves as a reminder that 

any party submitting factual information 

in an AD/CVD proceeding must certify 

to the accuracy and completeness of that 

information. See section 782(b) of the 

Act. Parties are hereby reminded that 

revised certification requirements are in 

effect for company/government officials 

as well as their representatives in all 

AD/CVD investigations or proceedings 

initiated on or after March 14, 2011. See 

Certification of Factual Information to 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Interim Final Rule, 76 FR 

7491 (February 10, 2011) (‘‘Interim Final 

Rule’’) amending 19 CFR 351.303(g)(1) 

and (2) and supplemented by 

Certification of Factual Information To 

Import Administration During 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Supplemental Interim 

Final Rule, 76 FR 54697 (September 2, 

2011). The formats for the revised 

certifications are provided at the end of 

the Interim Final Rule. The Department 

intends to reject factual submissions if 

the submitting party does not comply 

with the revised certification 

requirements. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.103(d), the 

Department will maintain and make 

available a service list for these 

proceedings. To facilitate the timely 

preparation of the service list(s), it is 

requested that those seeking recognition 

as interested parties to a proceeding 

contact the Department in writing 

within 10 days of the publication of the 

Notice of Initiation. 

Because deadlines in Sunset Reviews 

can be very short, we urge interested 

parties to apply for access to proprietary 

information under administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) immediately 

following publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The Department’s regulations on 

submission of proprietary information 

and eligibility to receive access to 

business proprietary information under 

APO can be found at 19 CFR 351.304– 

306. 

Information Required From Interested 

Parties 

Domestic interested parties defined in 

section 771(9)(C), (D), (E), (F), and (G) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b) wishing 

to participate in a Sunset Review must 

respond not later than 15 days after the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation by 

filing a notice of intent to participate. 

The required contents of the notice of 

intent to participate are set forth at 19 

CFR 351.218(d)(1)(ii). In accordance 

with the Department’s regulations, if we 

do not receive a notice of intent to 

participate from at least one domestic 

interested party by the 15-day deadline, 

the Department will automatically 

revoke the order without further review. 

See 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(iii). 

If we receive an order-specific notice 

of intent to participate from a domestic 

interested party, the Department’s 

regulations provide that all parties 

wishing to participate in the Sunset 

Review must file complete substantive 

responses not later than 30 days after 

the date of publication in the Federal 

Register of this notice of initiation. The 

required contents of a substantive 

response, on an order-specific basis, are 

set forth at 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3). Note 

that certain information requirements 

differ for respondent and domestic 

parties. Also, note that the Department’s 

information requirements are distinct 

from the Commission’s information 

requirements. Please consult the 

Department’s regulations for 

information regarding the Department’s 

conduct of Sunset Reviews.1 Please 

consult the Department’s regulations at 

19 CFR part 351 for definitions of terms 

and for other general information 

concerning antidumping and 

countervailing duty proceedings at the 

Department. 

This notice of initiation is being 

published in accordance with section 

751(c) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c). 

Dated: April 11, 2012. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10446 Filed 4–30–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–549–821] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags From 

Thailand: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request from 

an interested party, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on 

polyethylene retail carrier bags from 

Thailand. The period of review is 

August 1, 2010, through July 31, 2011. 

As a result of the withdrawal of the 

request for review, the Department is 

rescinding this review. 

DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2012. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1757 or (202) 482– 

1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 3, 2011, the Department 

published a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES