alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 130.07

 130.11

 130.14

 130.16

 130.18

 130.20

 130.21

 130.22

 130.27

 130.31

 130.32

 130.27

 130.21

 130.17

 130.23

 130.19

 130.14

 130.09

 130.03

 130.05

 130.13

 130.38

 130.58

 130.61

 130.55

 130.43

 130.40

 130.53

 588

 592

 595

 597

 599

 601

 602

 603

 609

 613

 614

 609

 602

 598

 604

 600

 595

 590

 584

 586

 594

 621

 642

 645

 639

 626

 623

 636

STORAGE

+7

+4

+3

+2

+2

+2

+1

+1

+6

+4

+1

-5

-7

-4

+6

-4

-5

-5

-6

+2

+8

+27

+21

+3

-6

-13

-3

+13

CHANGE

91

91

91

90

90

90

90

89

90

89

90

87

86

89

89

87

87

92

92

94

92

95

90

87

87

83

91

105

INFLOW

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 36

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

PUTAH

 50

 52

 52

 52

 52

 52

 52

 52

 52

 52

 54

 55

 55

 55

 51

 54

 55

 59

 60

 58

 53

 45

 43

 49

 53

 55

 57

 62

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 2

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .06

 .12

 .08

 .14

 .12

 .10

 .08

 .06

 .07

 .06

 .11

 .07

 .11

 .21

 .04

 .11

 .08

 .20

 .08

 .07

 .12

 .23

 .21

 .37

 .44

 .13

 .23

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .01

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

FEBRUARY 2021 RUN DATE: 03/01/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +55 2,524 1,491 995 9 3.95 .71

ACRE-FEET +55 5,006 2,957 1,974 18

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,974

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,957

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .71

JULY 1, 2020 6.86

 581

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 6.86
### SUBCHAPTER III—RECORDKEEPING, INFORMATION AVAILABILITY, AND TIMETABLES
Exhibit 99.1

                                        Press Release

[Graphic omitted] Ahold

                                        Royal Ahold
                                        Public Relations

                                        Date:                  February 27, 2003
                                        For more information:  +31.75.659.5720

               Ahold investigation into Disco Argentina completed

o    No material impact on Ahold's financial results

o    New management appointed

Zaandam, The Netherlands, February 27, 2003 - Ahold announced on February 24
that it has been investigating, through forensic accountants, the legality of
certain transactions at Ahold's Argentine subsidiary, Disco, and the accounting
treatment thereof. While Ahold believed that there was no material impact upon
the company, it was unable to comment further until the investigation was
complete. This work has now been concluded and the investigation shows that
there will be no material impact on Ahold's financial results.

Ahold also announces that the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer along with two other directors have resigned.

Two new directors have been appointed by Ahold to the Disco Board. Alfredo
Garcia Pye, currently Country Manager of Ahold's Santa Isabel operation in Peru,
has been appointed Chief Executive Officer. Pieter de Nooij, currently member of
Ahold's Latin America Support Group, has been appointed Chief Financial Officer.
Both appointments are effective immediately.

An Ahold team from the Netherlands has been installed at Disco to offer active
support to the company, enforce controls and ensure compliance with the Ahold
Business Principles.

Ahold Corporate Communications:  +31.75.659.5720

                                                  Albert Heijnweg 1,Zaandam
                                                  P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                  The Netherlands
                                                  Phone:  +31 (0)75 659 5720
http://www.ahold.com                              Fax:    +31 (0)75 659 8302
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo GUEVARA-BETANCOURT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40321.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern Dis*206trict of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gustavo Guevara-Betancourt appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States, without permission, following removal. *See*8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b). Guevara-Betancourt argues that the sentencing provisions in § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. Guevara-Betancourt’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Guevara-Betancourt contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530*U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Guevara-Betancourt properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Guevara-Betancourt also argues that the district court erred by requiring, as a condition of supervised release, that he cooperate in the collection of his DNA as directed by his probation officer. Guevara-Betancourt’s complaint is not ripe for review, and we dismiss this part of the appeal. *See United States v. Riascos-Cuenu,*428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert, filed*(Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662).

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
491 P.2d 1079

#### STATE of New Mexico, Respondent, v. Warren GRUENDER, Petitioner.

No. 9364.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Dec. 9, 1971.

This cause coming on before the Court for consideration on petition for writ of certiorari directed to the Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico, and the Court having considered said petition and being sufficiently advised in the premises;

It is ordered that petition for writ of certiorari be and the same is hereby denied.

It is further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals, 83 N.M. 327, 491 P.2d 1082, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
### §1. Commissioner of Indian Affairs

There shall be in the Department of the Interior a Commissioner of Indian Affairs, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

(R.S. §462.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §462 derived from act July 9, 1832, ch. 174, §1, 4 Stat. 564.

Provisions of this section relating to compensation of the Commissioner were omitted as obsolete. The position is in level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions of other officers, employees, and agencies of Department of the Interior, with certain exceptions, to Secretary of the Interior, with power to delegate, see Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1950, §§1, 2, eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3174, 64 Stat. 1262, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DAVID JOEL UMPIERRE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D21-2686

LT Case No. 2021-101542-MMDL

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed August 9, 2022 

Appeal from the County Court 

for Volusia County, 

Christopher Kelly, Judge. 

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, 

and Victoria Rose Cordero, 

Assistant Public Defender, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, 

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20317

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WILLIAM GLENN CHUNN

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-153-1

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent William Glenn Chunn has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chunn has not filed a response. Our independent review

of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
### §255. Repealed. June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §21, 62 Stat. 862, eff. Sept. 1, 1948

Section, R.S. §4062, related to assaulting, etc., a foreign minister. See sections 112 and 1545 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure.
### SUBCHAPTER V–B—TELEVISION BROADCASTING TO CUBA

#### Repeal of Subchapter

Subchapter repealed upon transmittal of determination by President under section 6063(c)(3) of this title that democratically elected government in Cuba is in power, see section 6037(c) of this title.
#### § 685.320 Who is eligible to receive services under the National Farmworker Jobs Program?

Eligible migrant farmworkers (including eligible MSFW youth) and eligible seasonal farmworkers (including eligible MSFW youth) as defined in § 685.110 are eligible for services funded by the NFJP.
EXHIBIT 32

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NVCN Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") Gary Borglund, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

     Date:  February 8, 2011                     By: */s/ Gary Borglund*                                            

                                                                  Gary Borglund 

                                                                  Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer     

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50428 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JIMMY ARREOLA RAMOS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. MO-95-CR-64 (1)

- - - - - - - - - - December 16, 1996 Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jimmy Arreola Ramos appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute a quantity of cocaine and for possession with the intent to distribute cocaine. He argues that the district court clearly erred by refusing to apply the safety-valve provision, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) and U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, in order to sentence Ramos below the statutory mandatory minimum sentence.No. 96-50428 - 2 -

We have reviewed the appellate arguments and the record. We detect no clear error. See United States v. Edwards , 65 F.3d 430, 433 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1881 Deciding whether someone is your parent or stepparent. ( a ) We consider your parent to be— ( 1 ) Your natural mother or father; or
( 2 ) A person who legally adopted you.
( b ) We consider your stepparent to be the present husband or wife of your natural or adoptive parent. A person is not your stepparent if your natural or adoptive parent, to whom your stepparent was married, has died, or if your parent and stepparent have been divorced or their marriage has been annulled.
( c ) *Necessary evidence.* We will accept your statement on whether or not someone is your parent or stepparent unless we have information to the contrary. If we have contrary information, you must show us, if you can, one or more of the following kinds of evidence that would help to prove whether or not the person is your parent or stepparent: Certificate of birth, baptism, marriage, or death, or decree of adoption, divorce, or annulment. If you cannot, you must tell us why not and show us any other evidence that would help to show whether or not the person is your parent or stepparent.
Order entered June 17, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 15 - 00343 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N .T., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 04 - 10316 - Z 

### O RDE R This accelerated appeal from a decree terminating Mother’s parental rights was filed March 2, 2015. The clerk’s record was timely filed March 16, 2015. The twenty

- nine volume reporter’s record was filed May 27, 2015. Based on the filing date of the reporter’s record, Mother’s brief was due June 16, 2015. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.6(a). Asserting she has been working on another appellate brief and has not had adequate time to prepare a quality brief for Mother, appellate counsel seeks a thirty

- day exte nsion of time to file Mother’s brief. Although the record is voluminous, we are required in an appeal of a suit for termination of the parent

- child relationship to ensure the appeal is brought to final disposition , so far as reasonably possible, within 18 0 days of the filing of the notice of appeal. See T EX . R. J UD . A DMIN . 6.2(a), reprinted in T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . , tit. 2, subtit. F app (West 2013). Accordingly, to ensure we meet this deadline, we GRANT appellant’s motion foradditional time to the ext ent we ORDER the brief be filed no later than Ju ly 6 , 2015

. We caution counsel that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG PRESIDING JUSTICE
Order entered March 7, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01309-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.W.M., JR., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-07-04168-Z

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Brown, and Justice Whitehill

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration of issues raised by 

appellee in a motion for judgment. On November 16, 2017, we stayed “all trial court 

proceedings” relating to that motion as well as appellee’s application for turnover relief, 

appellee’s motion to compel production of documents, and any motions or requests of appellee 

seeking post-judgment remedies or post-judgment discovery from appellant or third parties, 

including but not limited to the hearings set for November 21, 2017 and December 14, 2017.”

Before the Court now are appellee’s motion for contempt, appellee’s motion to modify 

the November 16th stay order, and appellant’s response to the motion to modify. Appellee’s 

motions stem from an arbitration proceeding commenced at appellant’s request after we entered 

the stay order. The arbitration concerned issues separate from those raised in this appeal and 

resulted in an award rendered December 21, 2017. 
By the motion for contempt, appellee argues appellant should be held in contempt, and 

the arbitration award declared void, because the arbitration violated the stay order. Appellee 

further argues that a temporary injunction granted by the 14th Judicial District Court based on the 

arbitration award should also be declared void. In the event the Court does not grant the motion 

for contempt, appellee argues in her motion to modify that she should be relieved of the stay so 

she may file with the trial court below a motion to vacate the arbitration award.

Because our November 16th order stayed only trial court proceedings related to the 

identified motions, we DENY the motions for contempt and to modify.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology and petrography of volcanic rocks of the Truk 
Islands, East Caroline Islands

#### Professional Paper 409

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp409 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:06:03
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 143

 143

 141

 153

 159

 162

 165

 167

 167

 167

 169

 170

 175

 171

 175

 174

 175

 177

 179

 179

 173

 174

 179

 182

 177

 185

 178

 183

 183

 186

 193

 90

 110

 109

 124

 140

 136

 143

 142

 148

 141

 133

 139

 150

 131

 144

 144

 137

 134

 138

 138

 135

 134

 136

 141

 133

 122

 133

 134

 117

 125

 146

 125

 124

 127

 142

 152

 152

 156

 155

 158

 156

 153

 155

 163

 156

 166

 161

 163

 163

 165

 165

 155

 158

 163

 164

 159

 161

 155

 164

 159

 159

 169

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 8, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER