alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§133 to 135. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–857, §14(1), (10), (12), (50), (52), (64), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1268, 1269, 1271, 1272

Section 133, R.S. §4833; acts Aug. 23, 1894, ch. 316, §1, 28 Stat. 492; May 29, 1928, ch. 901, §1(123), 45 Stat. 995, authorized Board of Managers of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers to aid persons by outdoor relief, and provided for transfers from branch homes.

Section 134, acts Aug. 27, 1888, ch. 914, §1, 25 Stat. 450; Mar. 2, 1889, ch. 411, 25 Stat. 975; Jan. 27, 1920, ch. 56, 41 Stat. 399; Feb. 12, 1925, ch. 225, 43 Stat. 933; Apr. 15, 1926, ch. 146, 44 Stat. 294; Feb. 23, 1927, ch. 167, 44 Stat. 1145; Dec. 22, 1927, ch. 5, §1, 45 Stat. 39; Mar. 23, 1928, ch. 232, §1, 45 Stat. 363; Feb. 28, 1929, ch. 366, 45 Stat. 1385; May 28, 1930, ch. 348, 46 Stat. 466; July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §2, 46 Stat. 1016; Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 281, §1, 46 Stat. 1375; June 30, 1932, ch. 330, §1, 47 Stat. 472; Aug. 1, 1939, ch. 408, §1, 53 Stat. 1145; Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 347, §1, 57 Stat. 603; May 18, 1948, ch. 299, §1, 62 Stat. 237; Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1003, 64 Stat. 981; Aug. 21, 1954, ch. 782, §1, 68 Stat. 757, related to aid to State or Territorial homes for disabled soldiers and sailors of United States.

Acts Aug. 1, 1939, ch. 408, §2, 53 Stat. 1145; Dec. 17, 1943, ch. 347, §2, 57 Stat. 603; May 18, 1948, ch. 299, §2, 62 Stat. 237; Aug. 21, 1954, ch. 782, §2, 68 Stat. 757, which were set out in a note under section 134 of this title, were repealed by Pub. L. 85–857, §14(74), (85), (95), (106), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1272, 1273.

Section 135, act June 7, 1924, ch. 295, §2, 43 Stat. 534, enumerated persons entitled to admission to hospital erected at Pacific branch of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1959, see section 2 of Pub. L. 85–857, set out as a note preceding Part I of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits.
§ 2.41 What search fees will you have to pay? ( a ) The bureau will charge search fees for all requests, subject to the restrictions of §§ 2.37(f), 2.39, and 2.40(a) of this subpart. The bureau may charge you for time spent searching even if it does not locate any responsive records or if it determines that the records are entirely exempt from disclosure.
( b ) For each quarter hour spent by personnel searching for requested records, including electronic searches that do not require new programming, the fees will be the average hourly General Schedule (GS) base salary, plus the District of Columbia locality payment, plus 16 percent for benefits, of employees in the following three categories, as applicable: ( 1 ) Clerical—Based on GS-6, Step 5, pay (all employees at GS-7 and below are classified as clerical for this purpose);
( 2 ) Professional—Based on GS-11, Step 7, pay (all employees at GS-8 through GS-12 are classified as professional for this purpose); and
( 3 ) Managerial—Based on GS-14, Step 2, pay (all employees at GS-13 and above are classified as managerial for this purpose).
( c ) You can review the current fee schedule for the categories discussed above in paragraph (b) of this section at *http://www.doi.gov/foia/fees-waivers .*
( d ) Some requests may require retrieval of records stored at a Federal records center operated by the National Archives and Records Administration. For these requests, bureaus will charge additional costs in accordance with the Transactional Billing Rate Schedule established by the National Archives and Records Administration.
[77 FR 76906, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 11130, Mar. 3, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4380 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4380

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove limitations on 
  the ability of certain dual citizens from participating in the Visa 
                Waiver Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2016

  Mr. Amash (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mrs. Dingell, and Mr. Massie) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove limitations on 
  the ability of certain dual citizens from participating in the Visa 
                Waiver Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Protection in Travel Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITATIONS OF CERTAIN DUAL CITIZENS FROM 
              PARTICIPATING IN THE VISA WAIVER PROGRAM.

    Section 217(a)(12) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1187(a)(12)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking clause (ii);
                    (B) by striking ``(C)--'' and all that follows 
                through ``the alien has not been present'' and 
                inserting ``(C), the alien has not been present''; and
                    (C) by redesignating subclauses (I), (II), and 
                (III) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii); and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), in the matter preceding clause 
        (i), by striking ``(A)(i)'' and inserting ``(A)''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT RITTENHOUSE PLAZA, INC.

v. JOAN LICHTMAN

v. MARVIN LEVIN, MARY DUDEN, STANTON OSWALD, WILLIAM LEDERER, E. GERALD RIESENBACH, JON SIRLIN, DANA PLON AND PETER LESSER PETITION OF: JOAN LICHTMAN : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 313 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 7th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Lea ve to Supplement and the Petition for Allowance of Appeal are DENIED
.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 800.92

 800.11

 799.86

 799.88

 799.92

 799.98

 800.08

 800.14

 800.16

 800.21

 800.32

 800.38

 800.46

 800.54

 800.52

 800.62

 800.70

 800.74

 800.80

 800.88

 800.94

 801.00

 801.08

 801.14

 801.18

 801.25

 801.35

 801.39

 801.43

 801.51

 12.89

 12.42

 12.28

 12.29

 12.31

 12.35

 12.41

 12.44

 12.45

 12.48

 12.54

 12.58

 12.63

 12.67

 12.66

 12.72

 12.76

 12.79

 12.82

 12.87

 12.90

 12.94

 12.99

 13.02

 13.05

 13.09

 13.15

 13.17

 13.19

 13.24

STORAGE

-0.44

-0.47

-0.14

+0.01

+0.02

+0.03

+0.06

+0.04

+0.01

+0.03

+0.06

+0.04

+0.05

+0.05

-0.01

+0.06

+0.05

+0.02

+0.04

+0.05

+0.03

+0.04

+0.05

+0.04

+0.02

+0.04

+0.06

+0.02

+0.02

+0.05

CHANGE

-52

-49

14

32

32

37

48

38

25

34

50

37

42

43

13

47

42

31

36

43

37

37

43

37

32

40

49

32

32

42

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 167

 185

 84

 23

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

OUTLET

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 0

C.F.S.

 .08

 .11

 .11

 .14

 .09

 .09

 .08

 .09

 .05

 .08

 .00

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .02

 .04

 .11

 .06

 .07

 .04

 .11

 .05

 .05

 .08

 .08

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

NOVEMBER 2007 RUN DATE: 02/13/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.07 924 927 0 38 1.97 .12

ACRE-FEET -70 1,833 1,839 0 75

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,839

 1,839

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .12

JULY 1, 2007 1.30

 13.33

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60873 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EVAN DOSS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:98-CR-5-LS

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Evan Doss, Jr., appeals the revocation of his supervised release from his underlying conviction for conspiracy to commit bankruptcy fraud and fraudulent transfer of assets. He argues that the district court erroneously concluded that he failed to make genuine efforts to obtain employment and make restitution payments and that he failed to explain adequately his reported income of a $1,000 consultant fee. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the evidence was sufficient to show by a preponderance of the evidence that Doss violated his supervisedNo. 04-60783 -2- release, and the district court did not abuse its discretion.
See United States v. Grandlund , 71 F.3d 507, 509 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. McCormick , 54 F.3d 214, 219 (5th Cir. 1995). Doss also argues that his right to confrontation was violated by the admission of hearsay testimony from his probation officer. Because Doss did not object to the testimony in the district court, our review is for plain error. See United States v. Ferguson , 369 F.3d 847, 849 (5th Cir. 2004); see also United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993). Due process affords Doss the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses unless there is a specific finding of good cause for not allowing confrontation. Morrissey v. Brewer , 408 U.S. 471, 489 (1972); McCormick , 54 F.3d at 221. Because we conclude that the challenged hearsay testimony was not the only evidence supporting the revocation of Doss’s supervised release, Doss cannot show that the confrontation violations, if any, affected his substantial rights and constituted plain error. See Olano , 507 U.S. at 734; McBride v. Johnson , 118 F.3d 432, 438 (5th Cir. 1997). Finally, Doss argues that the district court erroneously prevented him from attacking the underlying restitution order during the revocation proceeding. The district court did not

err. See United States v. Holland , 850 F.2d 1048, 1050 (5th Cir. 1988); United States v. Irvin , 820 F.2d 110, 111 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1


  Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Frezer, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin R. Keating,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                  /s/ Kevin R. Keating
                  --------------------
                  Kevin R. Keating
                  Principal Executive Officer
                  Principal Financial Officer
                  February 5, 2009






                                       41
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Howard F. Hill, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of RF Industries,
Ltd. ("registrant");

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I are  responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

     a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal  quarter  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the  equivalent
function):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting; and

Date:  March 16, 2005                                    /s/ Howard F. Hill
                                                        ------------------------
                                                         Howard F. Hill
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
#### Raffaele Villano, as Administrator, etc., of Antonio Villano, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*New York Times Company, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 17th day of January, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury and also from an order entered on the 18th day of January, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

The verdict of the jury that the defendant was negligent and that plaintiff was free from contributory negligence was without competent evidence to support it. It is also clear that the declarations of the *843. deceased and Dunlap were incompetent, and were improperly received in evidence. The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                         For the month of December 2002

                         Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                            Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron
                       456 (1038) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                         Form 20-F  X    Form 40-F
                                   ---             ---

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes         No  X
                                  ---        ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________

<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

Month Disseminated     Event and Summary                             Exhibit No.

December 2002          Press release, dated December 30, 2002,       99.1
                       regarding the Registrant's reporting
                       of its financial results for its fiscal
                       quarter ended September 30, 2002.

<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                        GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.
                                        (Registrant)


Date:  January 6, 2002                  By:  /s/  Abel Ayerza
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Name:   Abel Ayerza
                                           Title:  Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.87

 130.78

 130.81

 130.77

 130.86

 130.64

 130.68

 130.90

 130.86

 130.88

 130.04

 130.81

 130.89

 130.95

 130.78

 130.72

 130.71

 130.68

 130.79

 130.76

 130.96

 130.89

 130.69

 130.75

 130.71

 130.89

 130.91

 130.93

 130.94

 130.89

 675

 665

 668

 664

 674

 649

 654

 678

 674

 676

 585

 668

 677

 684

 665

 658

 657

 654

 666

 663

 685

 677

 655

 662

 657

 677

 679

 682

 683

 677

STORAGE

+6

-10

+3

-4

+10

-25

+5

+24

-4

+2

-91

+83

+9

+7

-19

-7

-1

-3

+12

-3

+22

-8

-22

+7

-5

+20

+2

+3

+1

-6

CHANGE

509

498

499

516

532

516

559

580

614

631

532

626

588

542

513

531

545

572

594

586

576

575

580

647

678

696

691

680

644

632

INFLOW

 67

 67

 64

 66

 61

 60

 61

 61

 62

 64

 63

 62

 60

 59

 59

 59

 59

 59

 59

 59

 59

 59

 60

 62

 66

 68

 66

 64

 64

 67

PUTAH

 438

 435

 432

 451

 465

 468

 493

 506

 553

 564

 514

 521

 521

 477

 462

 475

 486

 514

 527

 528

 505

 518

 530

 580

 614

 616

 622

 613

 578

 567

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .25

 .29

 .36

 .27

 .29

 .35

 .41

 .38

 .32

 .41

 .24

 .30

 .40

 .41

 .45

 .38

 .30

 .40

 .43

 .30

 .38

 .49

 .34

 .35

 .33

 .45

 .46

 .31

 .36

 .29

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2015 RUN DATE: 07/01/2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +8 17,482 15,573 1,866 39 10.70 .01

ACRE-FEET +8 34,676 30,889 3,701 77

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,701

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 30,889

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2014 18.40

 669

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### SUBCHAPTER XXVI—SOUTHERN UTE INDIAN TRIBE OF COLORADO