alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Eric D. JOHNSON, Petitioner — Appellant, v. Dora B. SCHRIRO, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; Arizona Attorney General Respondents — Appellees.

No. 04-15559.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 15, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Eric D. Johnson, pro se.

Deborah M. Fine, AFPD, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Flagstaff, AZ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Kerri L. Chamberlin, Aaron Jay Moskowitz, Esq., Office of the Arizona Attorney General, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondents-Appellees.

Before: WALLACE, HAWKINS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner, Eric Johnson, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. We affirm.

Johnson failed fairly to present his federal claims before the Arizona court. Therefore, his claims are unexhausted and therefore not properly before this court.1

“An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody *833pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted unless it appears that the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the State.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1)(A). Therefore, a state prisoner “must properly exhaust his state remedies by fairly presenting his federal claim in the state courts and thereby giving those courts an opportunity to act on his claim.” *Peterson v. Lampert,*319 F.3d 1153, 1155-56 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc) *(citing O’Sullivan v. Boerckel,*526 U.S. 838, 844, 119 S.Ct. 1728, 144 L.Ed.2d 1 (1999)); *Duncan v. Henry,*513 U.S. 364, 365, 115 S.Ct. 887, 130 L.Ed.2d 865 (1995).

Johnson did not specifically present to the Arizona state courts the federal claims he now asserts. However, there are two situations when a state appeal that does not directly cite a federal right may still satisfy the requirement that the issue be presented for purposes of exhaustion: (1) when the state court pleadings cite federal cases, *Lyons v. Crawford,*232 F.3d 666, 668 (9th Cir.2000), *as modified by*247 F.3d 904 (9th Cir.2001); or (2) when the state court pleadings cite state court decisions interpreting a federal right under federal law, *Peterson,*319 F.3d at 1158.

Neither exception applies here. A careful review of the record indicates that Johnson did not distinctly raise a federal issue, cite to federal law in his state pleadings, or cite state court decisions that interpreted a federal right under federal law. Johnson did not exhaust his federal claims in state court and is therefore not entitled to federal habeas corpus relief.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Johnson also presents an uncertified issue with respect to testimony regarding his momentary silence after receiving the *Miranda*warning. We decline to expand the Certificate of Appealability ("COA”) to reach this question because Johnson has failed to make *833a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David Hottman, Chief Executive Officer of Portal Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 14, 2009





/s/  David Hottman

David Hottman,

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          40,277
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               703,310
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,804,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,961
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,922
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,587,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,804,860
<SALES>                                        182,153
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               182,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,561
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                168,742
<INCOME-TAX>                                   168,742
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   168,742
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1444 Administrative law judge hearing procedures—general.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 68363, Aug. 26, 2024.

A hearing is open to the parties and to other persons the administrative law judge considers necessary and proper. At the hearing, the administrative law judge looks fully into the issues, questions you and the other witnesses, and, subject to the provisions of § 416.1435: Accepts as evidence any documents that are material to the issues; may stop the hearing temporarily and continue it at a later date if he or she finds that there is material evidence missing at the hearing; and may reopen the hearing at any time before he or she mails a notice of the decision in order to receive new and material evidence. The administrative law judge may decide when the evidence will be presented and when the issues will be discussed.

[81 FR 90995, Dec. 16, 2016
Exhibit
32


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. 1350





In connection with the accompanying
Annual Report of InferX Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of
the Company, hereby certifies that to such officer’s knowledge:





(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and





(2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May  24,
      2010By:
              /s/ Vijay SuriVijay
      SuriChief
      Executive OfficerDated:  May
      24, 2010By:
              /s/ Vijay SuriVijay
      SuriChief
      Financial Officer





The above certification is furnished
solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
§1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document.
#### § 664.230 Are the eligibility barriers for eligible youth the same as the eligibility barriers for the five percent of youth participants who do not have to meet income eligibility requirements?

No, the barriers listed in §§ 664.200 and 664.220 are not the same. Both lists of eligibility barriers include school dropout, homeless or runaway, pregnant or parenting, and offender, but each list contains barriers not included on the other list.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KYLE LEE WILSON,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 428 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 2nd day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of Retek
Inc. of our report dated September 9, 1999, relating to the combined financial
statements of Retek Logistics, Inc. and Retek Information Systems, Inc., which
appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


San Diego, California
September 9, 1999
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 420.75

 421.68

 422.18

 422.65

 423.24

 423.70

 424.82

 425.34

 425.64

 426.76

 427.73

 428.39

 429.53

 430.87

 431.51

 432.24

 433.00

 433.76

 434.36

 435.09

 436.44

 436.85

 437.88

 438.95

 439.77

 440.16

 440.57

 441.17

 441.42

 697,356

 705,608

 710,060

 714,254

 719,532

 723,657

 733,738

 738,436

 741,152

 751,299

 760,130

 766,159

 776,611

 788,958

 794,879

 801,650

 808,721

 815,813

 821,426

 828,274

 840,988

 844,863

 854,623

 864,802

 872,630

 876,362

 880,291

 886,051

 888,455

STORAGE

+4,334

+8,252

+4,452

+4,194

+5,278

+4,125

+10,081

+4,698

+2,716

+10,147

+8,831

+6,029

+10,452

+12,347

+5,921

+6,771

+7,071

+7,092

+5,613

+6,848

+12,714

+3,875

+9,760

+10,179

+7,828

+3,732

+3,929

+5,760

+2,404

CHANGE

2,397

4,251

2,281

2,190

2,738

2,190

5,110

2,373

1,460

5,310

4,523

3,128

5,263

6,329

3,074

3,612

3,604

3,605

2,970

3,600

6,477

2,152

4,853

5,370

4,099

1,953

2,130

3,017

1,420

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 27

 26

 26

 27

 28

 28

 28

 27

 27

 27

 28

 28

 27

 45

 63

 63

 58

 27

 12

 43

 46

 45

 55

 55

 51

 51

 50

 48

 60

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-185

-65

-11

-49

-49

-83

+0

+23

-64

-167

-43

-60

+33

-59

-27

-136

+19

-3

-128

-104

-22

-154

+123

-184

-101

-21

-99

-65

-148

OR

 63

 43

 17

 14

 14

 29

 0

 29

 26

 21

 41

 15

 15

 45

 30

 30

 30

 51

 27

 30

 31

 34

 43

 40

 28

 34

 56

 28

 37

C.F.S.

 .22

 .15

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .10

 .00

 .10

 .09

 .07

 .14

 .05

 .05

 .15

 .10

 .10

 .10

 .17

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .11

 .14

 .13

 .09

 .11

 .18

 .09

 .12

INCHES

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR April 4, 2016

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2016 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +195,433 101,479 0 1,126 0 -1,829 901 3.01 .34

ACRE-FEET +195,433 201,284 0 2,233 0 -3,628 1,787

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 2,233 TOTAL 2,233

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2015 TO DATE = 8.43

 693,022

SPILL 0 .34

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24968-24969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The purpose of this meeting is to evaluate requests 
for preclinical development resources, biologics, clinical assays and 
other developmental programs for potential new therapeutics for the 
treatment of cancer. The outcome of the evaluation will provide 
information to internal NCI committees that will decide whether

[[Page 24969]]

NCI should support requests and make available contract resources for 
development of the potential therapeutic to improve the treatment of 
various forms of cancer. The research proposals and the discussions 
could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such 
as patentable material and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the proposed research projects, the disclosure of which 
would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Clinical Assay Development Program (CADP).
    Date: July 31, 2012.
    Time: 8 a.m.-3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review grant applications for the CADP.
    Place: National Cancer Institute, NIH, Executive Plaza North, 
6130 Executive Boulevard, Room J, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Tracy G. Lively, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, 
Cancer Diagnosis Program (CADP), National Cancer Institute, NIH, 
6130 Executive Boulevard, EPN/6035A, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-
8639, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5935302f3c35202d193438303577373031773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f29e9b84979e8b86b29f939b9edc9c9b9adc959d84">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 19, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-10083 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 831.54

 831.53

 831.50

 831.48

 831.46

 831.45

 831.43

 831.44

 831.47

 831.45

 831.28

 831.23

 830.87

 831.00

 831.06

 831.08

 831.10

 831.13

 831.15

 831.16

 831.18

 831.21

 831.23

 831.37

 831.58

 831.62

 831.35

 831.32

 831.46

 831.56

 831.62

 38.92

 38.91

 38.87

 38.85

 38.83

 38.82

 38.80

 38.81

 38.84

 38.82

 38.63

 38.57

 38.17

 38.31

 38.38

 38.40

 38.42

 38.46

 38.48

 38.49

 38.51

 38.55

 38.57

 38.73

 38.96

 39.01

 38.71

 38.67

 38.83

 38.94

 39.01

STORAGE

-0.01

-0.01

-0.03

-0.02

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

+0.01

+0.03

-0.02

-0.19

-0.06

-0.40

+0.14

+0.07

+0.02

+0.02

+0.03

+0.02

+0.01

+0.02

+0.03

+0.02

+0.16

+0.24

+0.05

-0.30

-0.03

+0.16

+0.11

+0.07

CHANGE

20

20

10

14

15

20

15

31

43

13

140

316

114

103

65

43

43

49

43

37

43

48

43

110

150

293

183

113

110

87

65

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 5

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 20

 5

 5

 5

 215

 323

 296

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 250

 315

 110

 10

 10

 10

OUTLET

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .02

 .07

 .03

 .06

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .05

 .22

 1.25

 1.39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .84

 .00

 1.02

 .23

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2001 RUN DATE: 01/28/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.09 2,399 1,724 605 28 .83 5.35

ACRE-FEET +90 4,758 3,420 1,200 56

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,200

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,420

 4,620

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.35

JULY 1, 2000 10.04

 38.93

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### § 15.14 Applicability of laws.

In areas to which this part pertains all Federal Acts shall be enforced insofar as they are applicable, and the laws and regulations of the State of Florida shall be invoked and enforced in accordance with the Act of June 25, 1948 (62 Stat. 686; 18 U.S.C. 13)
Exhibit 31

                          ACCREDITED HOME LENDERS, INC.
                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

I, James A. Konrath, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
     containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
     included in the year covered by this annual report, of Accredited Mortgage
     Loan Trust 2005-2;

2.   Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
     does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of
     the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
     to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and
     servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is
     included in these reports;

4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
     under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my
     knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
     and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
     obligations under that agreement; and

5.   The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
     servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
     report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
     review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
     Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and
     servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports;

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company, as Trustee.

Date: March 24, 2006

Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., as Servicer
of Accredited Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-2

/s/ James A. Konrath
--------------------
Name: James A. Konrath
Title: Chairman of the Board
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 3,521

 3,016

 3,510

 5,405

 5,030

 3,806

 3,318

 3,616

 3,030

 4,795

 3,738

 3,996

 4,977

 3,062

 2,965

 2,873

 3,762

 3,730

 3,287

 4,008

 3,859

 3,957

 3,841

 4,048

 3,284

 3,724

 3,868

 3,837

 3,353

 3,648

 3,922

 95,000

 93,595

 91,780

 90,526

 91,134

 91,356

 90,404

 89,036

 88,019

 86,497

 86,727

 85,942

 85,441

 85,897

 84,511

 83,102

 81,677

 81,167

 80,652

 79,742

 79,562

 79,250

 79,047

 78,744

 78,652

 77,839

 77,485

 77,285

 77,066

 76,398

 76,044

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2011 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: November 1, 2011

 98,521

 96,611

 95,290

 95,931

 96,164

 95,162

 93,722

 92,652

 91,049

 91,292

 90,465

 89,938

 90,418

 88,959

 87,476

 85,975

 85,439

 84,897

 83,939

 83,750

 83,421

 83,207

 82,888

 82,792

 81,936

 81,563

 81,353

 81,122

 80,419

 80,046

 79,966

 4,531,000

 4,509,000

 4,488,000

 4,467,000

 4,445,000

 4,424,000

 4,403,000

 4,382,000

 4,360,000

 4,339,000

 4,318,000

 4,296,000

 4,275,000

 4,254,000

 4,232,000

 4,211,000

 4,190,000

 4,168,000

 4,147,000

 4,126,000

 4,104,000

 4,083,000

 4,062,000

 4,041,000

 4,019,000

 3,998,000

 3,977,000

 3,955,000

 3,934,000

 3,913,000

 3,891,000

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 100,000