alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs Capital I Securities, Series 2005-1 10-K

Exhibit 99.2

 

**IndependentAccountant’s Report **

 

Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (as Depositor)

One Wells Fargo Center 

301 South College Street 

Charlotte, NC 28288

 

U.S. Bank Trust National Association (as Trustee)

Corporate Trust Department 

100 Wall Street 

New York, NY 10005

 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We have examined assertions of Synthetic Fixed-Income Securities, Inc. (the “Depositor”) andU.S. Bank Trust National Association, (the “Trustee” and together with the Depositor, the “Management”)that the Depositor and the Trustee have complied, in all material respects, with the provisions of the Base Trust Agreement datedas of September 26, 2003, as supplemented by a series supplement dated as of June 13, 2005 (together, the “Trust Agreement”),in respect of the STRATS Trust For Goldman Sachs CapitalI Securities, Series 2005-1 (the “Trust”), during the period covered by the annual report on Form 10-K filed by theDepositor on behalf of the Trust for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Annual Report”). Management is responsiblefor compliance with the Trust Agreement. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management’s assertions based onour examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,on a test basis, evidence about the Depositor’s and the Trustee’s compliance with the Trust Agreement and performingsuch other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the Depositor and the Trusteehave complied, in all material respects, with the Trust Agreement during the period covered by the Annual Report and Management’sassertions with respect to such compliance are fairly stated, in all material respects, for the year ended December 31, 2016. 

 

/s/ Aston Bell, CPA 

 

New York, New York

March 17, 2017
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 17, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, January 17, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0148. SENZO MBATHA v. DIONNE CUTTING .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

19CV0149
### §7816. Establishment of regional framework

#### (a) Findings

The Congress finds that human rights initiatives can be undertaken on a multilateral basis, such as the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), which established a regional framework for discussing human rights, scientific and educational cooperation, and economic and trade issues.

#### (b) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that the United Sates 1 should explore the possibility of a regional human rights dialogue with North Korea that is modeled on the Helsinki process, engaging all countries in the region in a common commitment to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms.

(Pub. L. 108–333, title I, §106, Oct. 18, 2004, 118 Stat. 1292.)

1 So in original. Probably should be "States".
PUBLIC LAW 113–230—DEC. 16, 2014 128 STAT. 2119 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 229: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 8, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–230 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs located 

at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Corporal Michael 

J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. Crescenz 

Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. CORPORAL MICHAEL J. CRESCENZ DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The medical center of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs located at 3900 Woodland Avenue in Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Michael J. Crescenz 

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the medical 

center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 

reference to the Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Corporal Michael 

J. Crescenz Act 

of 2013. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[S. 229] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 666.230 How does the Department determine the amounts for Incentive Grant awards? ( a ) We determine the total amount to be allocated from funds available under WIA section 174(b) for Incentive Grants taking into consideration such factors as: ( 1 ) The availability of funds under section 174(b) for technical assistance, demonstration and pilot projects, evaluations, and Incentive Grants and the needs for these activities;
( 2 ) The number of States that are eligible for Incentive Grants and their relative program formula allocations under title I;
( 3 ) The availability of funds under WIA section 136(g)(2) resulting from funds withheld for poor performance by States; and
( 4 ) The range of awards established in WIA section 503(c).
( b ) We will publish the award amount for eligible States, after consultation with the Secretary of Education, within 90 days after the due date, established under § 666.205(a), for the latest State performance progress report providing the annual information needed to determine State eligibility.
( c ) In determining the amount available to an eligible State, the Secretary, with the Secretary of Education, may consider such factors as: ( 1 ) The relative allocations of the eligible State compared to other States;
( 2 ) The extent to which the negotiated levels of performance were exceeded;
( 3 ) Performance improvement relative to previous years;
( 4 ) Changes in economic conditions, participant characteristics and proposed service design since the negotiated levels of performance were agreed to;
( 5 ) The eligible State's relative performance for each of the indicators compared to other States; and
( 6 ) The performance on those indicators considered most important in terms of accomplishing national goals established by each of the respective Secretaries.
#### MALONEY, et al, Appellants, v. MALONEY, Respondent.

(238 N. W. 338.)

(File No. 6969.

Opinion filed October 19, 1931.)

*T. H. Luby*and *Irwin A. Churchill,*both of Huron, for Appellants.

*Kirby, Kirby & Kirby,*of Sioux Falls, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding, the certified copy of the notice of appeal was filed in this court on the 5th day of October, 1929. • The original notice of appeal and undertaking on appeal were filed herein on the 6th day of November, 1929, Thereafter, by numerous stipulations, the time for filing appellants’ brief herein was extended, to and including the 5th day of February, 1931. Since said date no further stipulations have been filed nor has appellants' brief been filed herein. Therefore, the appeal is deemed to have been abandoned, and the judgment and order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial are affirmed.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Techprecision Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Reindl,
      the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Mary Desmond, the Chief Financial Officer,
      of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief that:




(1) the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                September
                20, 2007/s/ James G. ReindlJames
                G. ReindlChief Executive Officer


/s/ Mary DesmondMary
                  DesmondChief Financial Officer
### §1248. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 92–59, §8, July 29, 1971, 85 Stat. 159, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to prescribe rules and regulations to effect the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### In the Matter of Lawyers Mortgage Company. William E. Russell et al., as Reorganization Managers of Lawyers Mortgage Company; Louis H. Pink, as Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as Liquidator.

Present—Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 2, 2012

Order 

October 2, 2012

143824(84)

STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 143824

v COA: 301951

Isabella CC: 2010-008488-CZ

BRANDON McQUEEN and MATTHEW

TAYLOR, d/b/a COMPASSIONATE

APOTHECARY, LLC,

Defendants-Appellants. 

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by the Attorney general for leave to file a 

brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is granted.
§ 901.31 Grounds for suspension or termination of enrollment. ( a ) *Failure to satisfy requirements for enrollment.* The enrollment of an actuary may be terminated if it is found that the actuary did not satisfy the eligibility requirements set forth in § 901.11 or § 901.12.
( b ) *Failure to discharge duties.* The enrollment of an actuary may be suspended or terminated if it is found that the actuary, following enrollment, failed to discharge his/her duties under ERISA. Such duties include those set forth in § 901.20.
( c ) *Disreputable conduct.* The enrollment of an actuary may be suspended or terminated if it is found that the actuary has, at any time after he/she applied for enrollment, engaged in any conduct set forth in § 901.12(f) or other conduct evidencing fraud, dishonesty, or breach of trust. Such other conduct includes, but is not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Conviction of any criminal offense under the laws of the United States (including section 411 of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. 1111), any State thereof, the District of Columbia, or any territory or possession of the United States, which evidences fraud, dishonesty, or breach of trust.
( 2 ) Knowingly filing false or altered documents, affidavits, financial statements or other papers on matters relating to employee benefit plans or actuarial services.
( 3 ) Knowingly making false or misleading representations, either orally or in writing, on matters relating to employee benefit plans or actuarial services, or knowingly failing to disclose information relative to such matters.
( 4 ) The use of false or misleading representations with intent to deceive a client or prospective client, or of intimations that the actuary is able to obtain special consideration or action from an officer or employee of any agency or court authorized to determine the validity of pension plans under ERISA.
( 5 ) Willful violation of any of the regulations contained in this part.
[43 FR 39757, Sept. 7, 1978, as amended at 76 FR 17776, Mar. 31, 2011]
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4511 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 

Administration 

AN ACT 

To amend the Veterans’ Oral History Project Act to allow 

the collection of video and audio recordings of biographical histories by immediate family members of members 

of the Armed Forces who died as a result of their service 

during a period of war. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4511 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Families 

3 Voices Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF VIDEO AND AUDIO RECORDINGS 

5 OF BIOGRAPHICAL HISTORIES BY IMME6 DIATE FAMILY MEMBERS OF MEMBERS OF 

7 THE ARMED FORCES WHO DIED AS A RESULT 

8 OF THEIR SERVICE DURING A PERIOD OF 

9 WAR. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 3(a) of 

11 the Veterans’ Oral History Project Act (20 U.S.C. 

12 2142(a)(1)) is amended to read as follows: 

13 ‘‘(1) to collect video and audio recordings of— 

14 ‘‘(A) personal histories and testimonials of 

15 veterans of the Armed Forces who served dur16 ing a period of war; and 

17 ‘‘(B) biographical histories by immediate 

18 family members of members of the Armed 

19 Forces who became missing in action or died as 

20 a result of their service during a period of 

21 war;’’. 

22 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3 of the 

23 Veterans’ Oral History Project Act (20 U.S.C. 2142) is 

24 further amended by adding at the end the following new 

25 subsection: 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4511 RFS 

1 ‘‘(d) DEFINITION OF IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEM2 BER.—For purposes of subsection (a), the term ‘imme3 diate family member’ means a parent, spouse, sibling, or 

4 child.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 6, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 24.4

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of
NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Jason W. Bixby, Douglas K. Cooper, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, with full power to act without the others, as
my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in connection with the Form 10-K,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of
Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 24th day of March, 2008.



/s/ John W. SheridanSignature


PrintName:

John W. Sheridan
§ 10010.3 General responsibilities. The following responsibilities reflect the Commission's decision that the officials responsible for making program decisions are also responsible for taking the requirements of NEPA into account in those decisions and will be held accountable for that responsibility: ( a ) Executive Director. ( 1 ) Is the Commission's focal point on NEPA matters and is responsible for overseeing the Commission's implementation of NEPA.
( 2 ) Serves as the Commission's principle contact with the CEQ.
( 3 ) Assigns to Commission staff the responsibilities outlined in this part.
( 4 ) Must comply with the provisions of NEPA, E.O. 11514 as amended, the CEQ regulations, and this part.
( 5 ) Will interpret and administer, to the fullest extent possible, the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States administered under the Commission's jurisdiction in accordance with the policies of NEPA.
( 6 ) Will continue to review the Commission's statutory authorities, administrative regulations, policies, programs, and procedures, in order to identify any deficiencies or inconsistencies therein which prohibit or limit full compliance with the intent, purpose, and provisions of NEPA and, in consultation with the Department of the Interior Office of the Solicitor, shall take or recommend, as appropriate, corrective actions as may be necessary to bring these authorities and policies into conformance with the intent, purpose, and procedures of NEPA.
( 7 ) Will monitor, evaluate, and control on a continuing basis the Commission's activities so as to protect and enhance the quality of the environment. Such activities will include those directed to conserving and enhancing the environment and designed to accomplish other program objectives which may affect the quality of the environment. The Executive Director will develop programs and measures to protect and enhance environmental quality and assess progress in meeting the specific objectives of such activities as they affect the quality of the environment.
( b ) *Members of the Commission.* ( 1 ) Are responsible for compliance with NEPA, E.O. 11514, as amended, the CEQ regulations, and this part.
( 2 ) Will insure that, to the fullest extent possible, the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States administered under the Commission's jurisdiction are interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies of NEPA.
( c ) Department of the Interior Office of the Solicitor. Is responsible for providing legal advice to the Commission regarding compliance with NEPA.
### SUBCHAPTER XLI—MENOMINEE TRIBE OF WISCONSIN: RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


          As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement No. 333-86288 of Stolt
Offshore S.A. on Form F-3 of our Report dated April 2, 2002, with respect to the
financial statements of Mar Profundo Girassol for the year ended December 31,
2001, appearing in the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Stolt Offshore S.A. for
the year ended November 30, 2001.

          We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts."


                                       BARBIER FRINAULT & ASSOCIES
                                       Member of Andersen Worldwide Organization




Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
July 31, 2002

/s/ FRANCIS SCHEIDECKER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.06

 130.25

 130.30

 130.09

 129.94

 130.06

 130.12

 129.56

 129.87

 129.81

 129.84

 129.79

 129.80

 129.69

 129.43

 130.15

 130.05

 129.90

 129.84

 129.69

 129.64

 129.88

 129.92

 130.45

 130.17

 130.06

 130.19

 130.01

 129.92

 129.65

 129.62

 587

 607

 612

 590

 574

 587

 593

 537

 567

 561

 564

 559

 560

 550

 525

 596

 586

 570

 564

 550

 545

 568

 572

 628

 598

 587

 600

 582

 572

 546

 543

STORAGE

+48

+20

+5

-22

-16

+13

+6

-56

+30

-6

+3

-5

+1

-10

-25

+71

-10

-16

-6

-14

-5

+23

+4

+56

-30

-11

+13

-18

-10

-26

-3

CHANGE

3,777

3,394

2,935

2,452

2,234

1,769

1,690

1,656

1,592

1,507

1,441

1,365

1,285

1,244

1,178

1,135

1,044

975

922

883

1,020

1,219

1,091

1,165

1,340

1,332

1,325

1,287

1,233

1,161

1,075

INFLOW

 3,693

 3,328

 2,884

 2,418

 2,197

 1,713

 1,630

 1,620

 1,510

 1,456

 1,389

 1,317

 1,233

 1,187

 1,125

 1,034

 991

 927

 870

 830

 956

 1,143

 1,037

 1,082

 1,300

 1,280

 1,258

 1,235

 1,181

 1,111

 1,015

PUTAH

 60

 56

 48

 45

 45

 49

 57

 64

 67

 54

 50

 50

 50

 61

 65

 65

 58

 55

 55

 59

 67

 63

 51

 54

 55

 58

 60

 60

 56

 62

 61

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .14

 .13

 .11

 .12

 .06

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .11

 .12

 .13

 .15

 .19

 .20

 .17

 .13

 .14

 .16

 .03

 .15

 .00

 .16

 .18

 .14

 .05

 .09

 .09

 .20

 .27

 .25

 .40

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.74

 .76

 .00

 .10

 .56

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 RUN DATE: 04/03/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4 47,726 1,760 45,950 13 4.29 3.61

ACRE-FEET +4 94,665 3,491 91,142 26

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 91,142

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,491

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.61

JULY 1, 2016 42.80

 539

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 42.80
### §321. Definitions

For the purposes of this chapter except as the context may otherwise require—

(a) The term "Department" means the Department of Health and Human Services.

(b) The term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

(c) The term "State" means a State or Territory of the United States, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia.

(d) The term "eligible person" means an individual with respect to whom the following certificates are furnished to the Secretary:

(1) A certificate of the Secretary of State that such individual is a national of the United States; and

(2) Either (A) a certificate obtained or transmitted by the Secretary of State that such individual has been legally adjudged insane in a named foreign country, or (B) a certificate of an appropriate authority or person (as determined in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services) stating that at the time of such certification such individual was in a named foreign country and was in need of care and treatment in a mental hospital.

(e) The term "residence" means residence as determined under the applicable law or regulations of a State or political subdivision for the purpose of determining the eligibility of an individual for hospitalization in a public mental hospital.

(Pub. L. 86–571, §1, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 308; Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), Oct. 17, 1979, 93 Stat. 695.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

"Department of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Department of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsec. (a) and "Secretary of Health and Human Services" substituted for "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" in subsecs. (b) and (d)(2), pursuant to section 509(b) of Pub. L. 96–88 which is classified to section 3508(b) of Title 20, Education.

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 86–571, §11, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 310, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter and repealing sections 191a and 196a of this title] shall, except as otherwise specified, take effect on the date of its enactment [July 5, 1960]."