alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Shengkai Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wang
Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.





Dated:
      September 2,  2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Wang ChenWang
      Chen
                    Chief
      Executive Officer
                    (principal
      executive officer, principal financial officer,
                    and
      principal accounting officer
)
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart M of Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart M of part 655 appear at 75 FR 10403, Mar. 5, 2010.

#### § 655.1250 Who is the official record keeper for these administrative appeals?

The official record of every completed administrative hearing procedure provided by subparts L and M of this part shall be maintained and filed under the custody and control of the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Upon receipt of a complaint seeking review of the final agency action in a United States District Court, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall certify the official record and shall transmit such record to the clerk of the court.
CERTIFICATIONS                     Exhibit 31.1

I, Howard F. Hill, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of RF Industries, Ltd.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



Date: March 4, 2004



  /s/  Howard F. Hill
-----------------------------
Howard F. Hill
Chief Executive Officer
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

December-11

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Pumpin

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,360 1,868 8,228 2-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,608 4,030 10,637 3-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 5,965 4,058 10,023 4-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 5,965 4,026 9,991 5-Dec-11 0400 0 4 0 4030 0 0 3 0 3 5,965 4,031 9,995 6-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,697 4,022 10,719 7-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,691 4,020 10,711 8-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,405 4,014 10,418 9-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 4,008 10,348 

10-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 4,014 10,354 11-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 4,018 10,358 12-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 4,023 10,363 13-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 4,025 10,365 14-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 4,020 10,360 15-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 3,987 10,327 16-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 3,924 10,264 17-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 3,980 10,321 

18-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,340 4,026 10,366 19-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 6,335 4,000 10,335 20-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 4,836 4,009 8,844 21-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 4,114 4,021 8,136 22-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 4,110 4,028 8,138 23-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 2,615 4,021 6,636 24-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 2,605 3,998 6,603 25-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 2,605 4,007 6,613 26-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 2,605 4,010 6,616 27-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 2,605 3,996 6,601 28-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 2,413 3,999 6,413 29-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 3,707 4,004 7,710 30-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 4,081 4,002 8,083 31-Dec-11 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 3,800 2,541 6,342 

Total 0400 0 4 0 4030 00303 160,493 120,728 281,221 3

Banks Tracy Combined B
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Charles Miles, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 56807;

First District (5th Division) —

July 13, 1973.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Lee T. Hettinger, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel,) for appellant

PER CURIAM.

DRUCKER, J., took no part.

*454Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Elmer C. Kissane, Thomas Passarelli, and James Staruck, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.
### §811. Repealed. May 26, 1949, ch. 143, §5, 63 Stat. 111

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title X, §1041, 60 Stat. 1032, related to delegation of authority by Secretary and Director General.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of TechPrecision Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Molinaro, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 29, 2011
/s/ James S. MolinaroJames S. MolinaroDated: June 29, 2011
/s/ Richard F. FitzgeraldRichard F. Fitzgerald
### **CHAPTER 47—CONVEYANCE OF SUBMARGINAL LAND**

Sec.
5501.
Submarginal lands of United States held in trust for specified Indian tribes.
5502.
Designation of tribes.
5503.
Submarginal lands of United States held in trust for Stockbridge Munsee Indian Community.
5504.
Existing rights of possession, contract, interest, etc.
5505.
Gross receipts from conveyed lands.
5506.
Tax exemption for conveyed lands and gross receipts; distribution of gross receipts to tribal members.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 215

 212

 234

 248

 233

 214

 161

 155

 168

 199

 191

 193

 179

 223

 207

 174

 148

 162

 165

 167

 163

 176

 155

 161

 169

 169

 190

 205

 195

 194

 197

 207

 203

 162

 129

 131

 134

 148

 155

 162

 159

 170

 150

 125

 115

 108

 115

 130

 129

 133

 132

 139

 142

 142

 141

 135

 203

 204

 212

 218

 216

 188

 148

 140

 144

 160

 169

 171

 170

 190

 184

 147

 130

 124

 134

 138

 143

 147

 143

 150

 150

 153

 155

 163

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 1, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
#### De Lagotellerie, Respondent, v. Automobile Tire Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
§ 802.206 Effect of motion for reconsideration on time for appeal. ( a ) A timely motion for reconsideration of a decision or order of an administrative law judge or deputy commissioner shall suspend the running of the time for filing a notice of appeal.
( b ) ( 1 ) In a case involving a claim filed under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act or its extensions (see § 802.101(b)(1)-(5)), a timely motion for reconsideration for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is one which is filed not later than 10 days from the date the decision or order was filed in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner.
( 2 ) In a case involving a claim filed under title IV of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act, as amended (see § 802.101(b)(6)), a timely motion for reconsideration for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section is one which is filed not later than 30 days from the date the decision or order was served on all parties by the administrative law judge and considered filed in the Office of the Deputy Commissioner (see §§ 725.478 and 725.479(b), (c) of this title).
( c ) If the motion for reconsideration is sent by mail and the fixing of the date of delivery as the date of filing would result in a loss or impairment of reconsideration rights, it will be considered to have been filed as of the date of mailing. The date appearing on the U.S. Postal Service postmark (when available and legible) shall be prima facie evidence of the date of mailing. If there is no such postmark or it is not legible, other evidence such as, but not limited to, certified mail receipts, certificates of service and affidavits may also be used to establish the mailing date.
( d ) If a motion for reconsideration is granted, the full time for filing an appeal commences on the date the subsequent decision or order on reconsideration is filed as provided in § 802.205.
( e ) If a motion for reconsideration is denied, the full time for filing an appeal commences on the date the order denying reconsideration is filed as provided in § 802.205.
( f ) If a timely motion for reconsideration of a decision or order of an administrative law judge or deputy commissioner is filed, any appeal to the Board, whether filed prior to or subsequent to the filing of the timely motion for reconsideration, shall be dismissed without prejudice as premature. Following decision by the administrative law judge or deputy commissioner pursuant to either paragraph (d) or (e) of this section, a new notice of appeal shall be filed with the Clerk of the Board by any party who wishes to appeal. During the pendency of an appeal to the Board, any party having knowledge that a motion for reconsideration of a decision or order of an administrative law judge or deputy commissioner has been filed shall notify the Board of such filing.
§ 725.706 What reports must a medical provider give to OWCP? ( a ) Within 30 days following the first medical or surgical treatment provided under § 725.701, the provider must furnish to OWCP and the responsible operator or its insurance carrier, if any, a report of such treatment.
( b ) In order to permit continuing supervision of the medical care provided to the miner with respect to the necessity, character and sufficiency of any medical care furnished or to be furnished, the provider, operator or carrier must submit such reports in addition to those required by paragraph (a) of this section as OWCP may from time to time require. Within the discretion of OWCP, payment may be refused to any medical provider who fails to submit any report required by this section.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Waterstone Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas S. Gordon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Douglas S. Gordon


Douglas S. Gordon


Chief Executive Officer


March 16, 2010
§ 685.230 Can a grantee's designation be terminated? Yes, a grantee's designation may be terminated by the Department for cause: ( a ) In emergency circumstances when such action is necessary to protect the integrity of Federal funds or to ensure the proper operation of the program. Any grantee so terminated will be provided with written notice and an opportunity for a hearing within 30 days after the termination; or
( b ) By the Department's Grant Officer, if the recipient materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the award. In such a case, the Grant Officer will follow the administrative regulations at § 683.440 of this chapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.86

 130.75

 130.80

 130.81

 130.71

 130.88

 130.85

 130.86

 130.75

 130.84

 130.92

 130.92

 130.86

 130.83

 130.62

 130.84

 130.78

 130.81

 130.78

 130.72

 130.66

 130.70

 130.60

 130.90

 130.73

 130.73

 130.78

 130.99

 130.82

 130.69

 130.74

 674

 662

 667

 668

 657

 676

 673

 674

 662

 671

 680

 680

 674

 670

 646

 671

 665

 668

 665

 658

 651

 656

 644

 678

 659

 659

 665

 689

 669

 655

 660

STORAGE

+8

-12

+5

+1

-11

+19

-3

+1

-12

+9

+9

+0

-6

-4

-24

+25

-6

+3

-3

-7

-7

+5

-12

+34

-19

+0

+6

+24

-20

-14

+5

CHANGE

635

618

574

524

546

563

540

548

545

534

514

507

532

542

565

576

537

545

540

523

512

531

535

547

536

564

547

509

474

485

464

INFLOW

 68

 64

 63

 63

 63

 63

 63

 63

 63

 63

 60

 58

 56

 50

 45

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 561

 558

 507

 458

 488

 489

 478

 483

 487

 465

 448

 447

 478

 492

 530

 518

 496

 499

 498

 483

 472

 483

 497

 486

 501

 519

 499

 452

 439

 447

 416

PUTAH

 2

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .45

 .44

 .42

 .44

 .41

 .35

 .38

 .38

 .42

 .41

 .33

 .43

 .39

 .44

 .47

 .43

 .42

 .35

 .36

 .40

 .40

 .44

 .41

 .41

 .46

 .44

 .49

 .53

 .44

 .47

 .50

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 RUN DATE: 08/01/2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -6 16,712 15,074 1,593 46 13.11 .00

ACRE-FEET -6 33,148 29,899 3,160 91

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,160

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 29,899

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2016 .00

 666

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AME FOR THE NINE MONTHS 
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1995, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,261
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,191
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,948
<PP&E>                                         128,992
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,149
<BONDS>                                         64,038
<COMMON>                                        15,933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,782
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               144,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,061
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,164
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement and in the related prospectus of Apple REIT Seven, Inc., as listed below, of our reports dated March 3, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Apple REIT Seven, Inc.
and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Apple REIT Seven, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                           |  |                                                                                     
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Registration Statement No. |  | Description                                                                         
|333-144631                 |  | Form S-3D, pertaining to the Companys Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG
LLP

Richmond, Virginia

March 3, 2008
#### § 702.505 Vocational rehabilitation; referrals to other public and private agencies.

Referrals to such other public and private agencies providing assistance to disabled persons such as public welfare agencies, Public Health Services facilities, social services units of the Veterans Administration, the Social Security Administration, and other such agencies, shall be made by the vocational rehabilitation adviser, where appropriate, on an individual basis when requested by disabled employees. Such referrals do not provide for a service cost reimbursement by the Department of Labor.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO





In connection with the Annual Report of Zoro Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, Andrew Brodkey, President/Chief Executive Officer and Jas Butalia, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated: August 13, 2010                                                                                                                               
|   





|                                  |  |  |                         | 
|--------------------------------- |  |  | ----------------------- | 
|"Andrew Brodkey"                  |  |  | "Jas Butalia"           | 
|Andrew Brodkey                    |  |  | Jas Butalia             | 
|President/Chief Executive Officer |  |  | Chief Financial Officer |