alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification
I, Bryan Calder, Executive Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, certify that:
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of:
MASTR Asset Backed Securities Trust 2005-WMC1Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2005-WMC1 ;
Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading, as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;
Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;
Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in the report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and
The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.
In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
Title:
U.S. Bank National Association
By:           /s/ Bryan Calder
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Name:
Bryan Calder
Executive Vice President
Date:         March 22, 2006


Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC as successor in interest to Ocwen Federal Bank FSB, as Servicer
#### Juan Carlos NORDETTUR; Maria Cristia Iban Baron, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75322.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Elsa I. Martinez, Esq., Martinez Golds-by & Associates, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Esq., DOJ — U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Juan Carlos Nordettur and Maria Cristia Iban Baron, natives and citizens of Cuba, petition for review of the Board of *785Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying their motion to reopen proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, *Singh v. INS,*213 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny the petition for review.

Petitioners’ contention that their reliance on the fraudulent advice of a notary caused them to miss their hearing was not properly presented to the IJ or to the BIA. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider the issue.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID** 

### 07267 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### x 07267\07267_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

07267\07267_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 07267\07267_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 07267\07267_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 07267\Re Plant 07267.rtf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response

07267\07267_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
### §3618. Defense of Panama Canal

In the event of an armed attack against the Panama Canal, or when, in the opinion of the President, conditions exist which threaten the security of the Canal, the Administrator of the Commission shall, upon the order of the President, comply with such directives as the United States military officer charged with the protection and defense of the Panama Canal may consider necessary in the exercise of his duties.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1108, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 458.)
J. 

J. 

his plea canvass, noted that McGee stated that he felt "clear-headed" and 

was properly medicated at the time, and recalled that "we proceeded to 

talk about your case and your constitutional rights." The district court 

stated that it accepted McGee's guilty plea after he answered in the 

affirmative to the question of whether he was pleading guilty because he 

was, in fact, guilty of the charged offense. At that point, the district court 

announced, "And so today is the date and time set for sentencing in this 

matter, And I'm prepared to go forward with the sentencing." 

We conclude that the district court's announcement amounts 

to a denial of the oral motion. McGee offers no relevant authority to 

support his claim that the district court was obligated to explore his 

request "more fully." Our review of the record reveals that McGee failed 

to either provide a substantial, fair, and just reason which required the 

withdrawal of his plea, see Crawford, 117 Nev. at 721, 30 P.3d at 1125, or 

satisfy his burden and prove that his plea was invalid, see Molina v. State, 

120 Nev. 185, 190, 87 P.3d 533,537 (2004). We conclude that the district 

court did not abuse its discretion by denying McGee's motion, see Johnson 

v. State, 123 Nev. 139, 144, 159 P.3d 1096, 1098 (2007), and we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Pickering 

\ jt.A.GL—C , J. 

Parraguirre 

Saitta 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A e 
cc: Hon. Lidia Stiglich, District Judge 

Washoe County Public Defender 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) I947A
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4440 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4440

 To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the construction of 
 the Cheney division, Wichita Federal reclamation project, Kansas, and 
 for other purposes'' to extend the authority of the Secretary of the 
 Interior to carry out the Equus Beds Division of the Wichita Project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2016

  Mr. Pompeo introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the construction of 
 the Cheney division, Wichita Federal reclamation project, Kansas, and 
 for other purposes'' to extend the authority of the Secretary of the 
 Interior to carry out the Equus Beds Division of the Wichita Project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EQUUS BEDS DIVISION.

    Section 10(h) of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
construction of the Cheney division, Wichita Federal reclamation 
project, Kansas, and for other purposes'' (Public Law 86-787; 74 Stat. 
1026; 120 Stat. 1473) is amended by striking ``10 years'' and inserting 
``20 years''.
                                 <all>
```
[No. 8118.

Department One.

November 30, 1909.]

#### L. M. Dennis, *Appellant,*v. Nelson Gary, Respondent.1

Highways — Prescription—Permissive Use — Evidence — Sufficiency. A public road by prescriptive use is not shown where it appears that the road was constructed and used almost exclusively as a logging road under written leases, and no public money was spent on it.

Same — Evidence—Issues and Proof. In an action to declare a road a public highway by prescriptive use, it is admissible, under a general denial, to show that the use was only permissive under a lease.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Cowlitz county, McCredie, J., entered February 2, 1909, upon dismissing an action for an injunction, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury.

Affirmed.

*Imus &; Stone*,and *Jeffers Lenon,*for appellant.

*O’Neill*& *Leonard,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 105 Pac. 172.

Gose, J.

This action was instituted for the purpose of having a certain roadway or logging road declared to be a *113public highway, and to enjoin the respondent from obstructing it. There was a decree for the respondent denying the relief sought, from which the appeal is prosecuted.

The evidence shows conclusively that the construction of the roadway commenced in 1896, and that it was completed in 1897; that it was built as. a logging road by placing poles parallel five or six feet apart so that cars could be hauled over them, first by horse power and later by means of an engine; that the parties who constructed and used the road for the conveyance of logs, and their successors in interest in the logging business other than the appellant, used it by permission under written leases until 1907; that it has been used almost exclusively as a logging road in the manner stated; that no public money has been expended upon it; and that it has never been treated or.used as a public highway. The evidence does not show any use of the road of any magnitude other than by the parties who constructed it, their successors in interest and employees. The complaint alleged that the road was üsed hy the public for thirteen years. This was denied by the answer. The court permitted the respondent to introduce certain leases in evidence, showing a permissive use of the road. It is contended that the leases were not admissible as evidence under a general denial. The theory of the appellant was that the road had become a public highway by prescription. Upon a general denial it was therefore competent to show that the use had been permissive and not adverse. *Penter v. Staight,*1 Wash. 365, 25 Pac. 469; *Scheller v. Pierce County,*55 Wash. 298, 104 Pac. 277. Moreover a permissive use was abundantly established by competent parol testimony to which no exception was reserved.

Finding no error in the record, the decree will be affirmed.

Rudkin, C. J., Fullerton, Chadwick, and Morris, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 595

 587

 584

 573

 570

 559

 529

 507

 468

 382

 377

 378

 386

 403

 416

 409

 373

 378

 405

 388

 408

 429

 420

 418

 446

 467

 494

 496

 511

 513

 423

 469

 474

 465

 445

 407

 383

 361

 318

 308

 317

 348

 368

 382

 394

 356

 338

 353

 367

 359

 393

 411

 382

 367

 397

 419

 446

 476

 485

 473

 492

 525

 544

 513

 518

 497

 435

 406

 384

 337

 353

 358

 377

 391

 405

 383

 354

 370

 382

 371

 406

 420

 404

 390

 412

 437

 463

 487

 499

 496

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

DELTA MENDOTA CANAL AT CHECK 13 (O'NEILL)
### §9226. Travel sanctions

The Secretary of State may deny a visa to, and the Secretary of Homeland Security may deny entry into the United States of, any alien who is—

(1) a designated person;

(2) a corporate officer of a designated person; or

(3) a principal shareholder with a controlling interest in a designated person.

(Pub. L. 114–122, title II, §206, Feb. 18, 2016, 130 Stat. 108.)
### SUBCHAPTER IV—EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN ALIENS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.12

 130.19

 130.15

 130.10

 130.08

 129.75

 129.74

 129.92

 130.17

 130.26

 130.20

 130.10

 129.82

 129.71

 129.70

 129.68

 129.73

 129.91

 130.14

 130.30

 130.23

 130.16

 130.19

 130.24

 130.30

 130.34

 130.38

 130.34

 130.37

 130.42

 130.45

 593

 600

 596

 591

 589

 556

 555

 572

 598

 608

 601

 591

 562

 552

 551

 549

 554

 571

 595

 612

 604

 597

 600

 605

 612

 616

 621

 616

 620

 625

 628

STORAGE

+17

+7

-4

-5

-2

-33

-1

+17

+26

+10

-7

-10

-29

-10

-1

-2

+5

+17

+24

+17

-8

-7

+3

+5

+7

+4

+5

-5

+4

+5

+3

CHANGE

133

134

133

132

102

73

93

94

89

81

70

87

84

91

93

91

92

91

91

82

65

65

67

67

68

66

67

66

67

67

66

INFLOW

 88

 86

 84

 84

 53

 34

 34

 32

 31

 31

 31

 30

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

PUTAH

 35

 43

 50

 50

 50

 56

 60

 53

 45

 45

 43

 62

 70

 67

 65

 63

 60

 53

 50

 43

 40

 40

 36

 35

 35

 35

 35

 40

 36

 35

 35

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .22

 .38

 .36

 .21

 .14

 .15

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .02

 .04

 .12

 .12

 .05

 .05

 .15

 .06

 .13

 .08

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .41

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2011 RUN DATE: 02/07/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +52 2,667 1,465 1,169 5 2.87 .43

ACRE-FEET +52 5,290 2,906 2,319 10

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,319

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,906

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .43

JULY 1, 2011 3.01

 576

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of BEFUT International Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year
ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), Mei Yu, as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
      September 28, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Mei YuMei
      YuChief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal financial officer and
      principal accounting officer)







This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316] 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

Mr. Robert Schaaf, License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 20555-0001. Mr. Schaaf may be contacted at the aforementioned telephone number or e-mail address. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 8th day of September, 2004.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Pao-Tsin Kuo, 

Program Director, License Renewal and Environmental Impacts Program, Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 04-21342 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
This report is not available for the months of 

July, August, and September.
#### § 681.510 What is comprehensive guidance and counseling?

Comprehensive guidance and counseling provides individualized counseling to participants. This includes drug and alcohol abuse counseling, mental health counseling, and referral to partner programs, as appropriate. When referring participants to necessary counseling that cannot be provided by the local youth program or its service providers, the local youth program must coordinate with the organization it refers to in order to ensure continuity of service.
To
        the
        Board of Directors
 China
        Medicine Corporation
 
 Consent
        of Independent Accountants China Medicine Corporation Audited Financial
        Statements December 31, 2006, and 2005.
 
 We
        consent to the incorporation in the Annual Report of China Medicine Corporation
        on Form 10-KSB of our report dated March 28, 2007 on our audits of the financial
        statements of China Medicine Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December
        31,
        2006, and 2005 and for the years then ended, which our reports are incorporated
        in the Form 10-KSB.
 
 /s/
        Moore
        Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP
  Walnut,
        California
 April
        2,
        2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.68

 130.60

 130.53

 130.61

 130.62

 130.72

 130.60

 130.52

 130.35

 130.50

 130.61

 130.71

 130.86

 130.65

 130.52

 130.80

 130.52

 130.87

 130.84

 130.85

 130.66

 130.77

 130.65

 130.70

 130.76

 130.54

 130.60

 130.55

 130.44

 130.48

 654

 644

 636

 645

 646

 658

 644

 635

 618

 633

 645

 657

 674

 650

 635

 667

 635

 675

 671

 673

 651

 664

 650

 656

 663

 637

 644

 639

 627

 631

STORAGE

+6

-10

-8

+9

+1

+12

-14

-9

-17

+15

+12

+12

+17

-24

-15

+32

-32

+40

-4

+2

-22

+13

-14

+6

+7

-26

+7

-5

-12

+4

CHANGE

561

556

541

555

564

564

552

626

658

655

630

588

595

591

635

714

682

737

743

760

731

733

680

669

682

630

642

582

594

621

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 44

 45

 44

 51

 57

 57

 57

 54

 50

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 48

 46

 43

 43

 43

 45

 46

 46

 52

 56

 56

PUTAH

 514

 516

 501

 505

 517

 513

 506

 572

 608

 588

 568

 531

 536

 553

 593

 648

 648

 667

 696

 709

 695

 681

 643

 622

 632

 596

 591

 532

 543

 562

PUTAH

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .30

 .45

 .33

 .34

 .32

 .26

 .43

 .44

 .47

 .58

 .44

 .36

 .45

 .45

 .44

 .46

 .45

 .52

 .33

 .44

 .34

 .42

 .26

 .26

 .28

 .37

 .25

 .37

 .38

 .37

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2012 RUN DATE: 07/02/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -17 19,071 17,586 1,448 44 11.56 .03

ACRE-FEET -17 37,827 34,882 2,872 87

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,872

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 34,882

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .03

JULY 1, 2011 17.67

 648

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment no. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Techprecision Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Molinaro, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: July 29, 2011
/s/ James MolinaroJames MolinaroChief Executive OfficerDated: July 29, 2011
/s/ Richard F. FitzgeraldRichard F. FitzgeraldChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert Roth, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Cantop Ventures, Inc. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Cantop Ventures, Inc.

Date: October 12, 2007


/s/ Robert Roth
-------------------------------
Robert Roth
Director