alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 4241

#### O. R. Willey, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 19, 1950.*

Robert H. Allison and Herbert N. Tbagethon, Attorneys for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Abthub Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Delaney, J.

Claimant, O. R. Willey, was employed on February 14, 1949, in the Division of Highways, Department of Public Works and Buildings. On that day, while using an electric drill to cut holes in a metal truck bed preliminary to the construction of a shield over the truck cab, the bit stuck. This caused the drill to twist in claimant’s hand before the power could be shut off. The index finger of claimant’s left hand was injured.

The claimant received no medical attention until March 8, 1949, at which time he was treated by Dr. Charles W. Harrison of the Olney Sanitarium Clinic. Dr. Harrison’s final report of April 29,1949 indicated a frac*70ture and slight stiffness of index finger. Dr. F. E, Fleischli in his report of May 8, 1950 stated claimant had a flexor tendon injury, which is permanent. An examination by Frank M. Summers, a Commissioner of this Court, showed that claimant sustained a 10 per cent loss of use of the index finger of his left hand as a result of the injury.

No jurisdictional question is raised. Respondent and claimant were operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the accident in question arose out of and in the course of the employment.

The record consists of the complaint, departmental report, waiver of briefs of respondent and claimant, and transcript of the testimony.

The claimant at the time of the injury had no children under the age of sixteen years. Claimant received earnings from respondent in the amount of $2,820.00 in the year preceding his injury. Mr. Willey did not lose any time, and was paid full salary throughout his period of disability.

For a 10 per cent loss of use of the index finger of his left hand, under Section 8, Paragraph (e) 2, the claimant should receive from the respondent, the compensation rate, $19.50 per week for 4 weeks.

An award is, therefore, made to claimant, O. R. Willey, in the sum of $78.00, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith.

Johnson Fleming was employed to take and transcribe the evidence at the hearing before Commissioner Summers. Charges in the amount of $13.75 were incurred for these services, which charges are fair, reasonable and customary. An award is, therefore, entered in favor of Johnson Fleming in the amount of $13.75, payable forthwith.

*71This award is subject to the approval of the Governor as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1550 Notice of charges against a representative. ( a ) The General Counsel or other delegated official will prepare a notice containing a statement of charges that constitutes the basis for the proceeding against the representative.
( b ) We will send this notice to the representative either by certified or registered mail, to his or her last known address, or by personal delivery.
( c ) We will advise the representative to file an answer, within 14 business days from the date of the notice, or from the date the notice was delivered personally, stating why he or she should not be suspended or disqualified from acting as a representative in dealings with us.
( d ) The General Counsel or other delegated official may extend the 14-day period specified in paragraph (c) of this section for good cause in accordance with § 416.1411.
( e ) The representative must— ( 1 ) Answer the notice in writing under oath (or affirmation); and
( 2 ) File the answer with the Social Security Administration, at the address specified on the notice, within the 14-day time period specified in paragraph (c) of this section.
( f ) If the representative does not file an answer within the 14-day time period specified in paragraph (c) of this section (or the period extended in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section), he or she does not have the right to present evidence, except as may be provided in § 416.1565(g).
[45 FR 52106, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 56 FR 24132, May 29, 1991; 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997; 63 FR 41418, Aug. 4, 1998; 71 FR 2878, Jan. 18, 2006; 76 FR 80247, Dec. 23, 2011; 83 FR 30858, July 2, 2018]
EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the quarterly report of NVCN Corporation.
("Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to his
knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 19, 2008                       By: /s/ Gary Borglund
                                                -----------------
                                                Gary Borglund,
                                                Principal Executive Officer
                                                and Principal Financial Officer
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 124 114 118

2 126 116 120

3 128 118 123

4 128 121 125

5 127 123 125

6 126 123 125

7 127 123 125

8 129 121 126

9 129 122 127

10 130 127 129

11 131 126 129

12 130 125 129

13 130 122 127

14 130 117 126

15 130 117 124

16 130 116 123

17 130 113 122

18 129 111 120

19 125 113 119

20 124 116 120

21 124 118 121

22 124 118 121

23 123 117 121

24 124 118 121

25 121 115 118

26 125 113 118

27 128 116 119

28 133 118 121

29 136 120 124

30 140 119 126

31 142 117 127

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Andreas On The San Joaquin River 

Period: July 2023 Run Date: 8/15/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 710.05

 710.03

 709.89

 709.10

 708.54

 707.80

 707.67

 707.77

 708.54

 708.87

 709.20

 709.52

 709.72

 710.04

 710.22

 710.52

 710.56

 710.87

 711.06

 711.22

 711.37

 711.56

 711.70

 711.83

 712.04

 712.14

 712.25

 711.86

 711.09

 710.33

 709.54

 862

 862

 858

 836

 820

 799

 796

 799

 820

 829

 839

 848

 853

 862

 868

 877

 878

 887

 893

 898

 902

 908

 912

 916

 922

 925

 929

 917

 894

 871

 848

STORAGE

+15

-1

-4

-22

-16

-21

-4

+3

+22

+9

+9

+9

+6

+9

+6

+9

+1

+9

+6

+5

+4

+6

+4

+4

+6

+3

+4

-12

-23

-23

-23

CHANGE

17

10

8

-1

2

0

3

1

11

5

5

5

3

5

3

5

1

5

3

3

2

3

2

2

3

2

2

1

-2

-2

-2

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 5

 7

 10

 10

 10

 0850

TIME

 .75

COPPER

 1.53

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 1999 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 25, 2000

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +0 105 0 102

ACRE-FEET +0 208 0 202

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 202

 202

 848

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  annual  report of  Frezer, inc. (the "Company")  on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report")  the undersigned  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 20, 2006

/s/ David R. Koos



David R. Koos

Chief Executive Officer
### §8928. Support for Russian democracy and civil society organizations

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of State shall, directly or through nongovernmental or international organizations, such as the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the National Endowment for Democracy, and related organizations—

(1) improve democratic governance, transparency, accountability, rule of law, and anti-corruption efforts in the Russian Federation;

(2) strengthen democratic institutions and political and civil society organizations in the Russian Federation;

(3) expand uncensored Internet access in the Russian Federation; and

(4) expand free and unfettered access to independent media of all kinds in the Russian Federation, including through increasing United States Government-supported broadcasting activities, and assist with the protection of journalists and civil society activists who have been targeted for free speech activities.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of State $20,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 through 2018 to carry out the activities set forth in subsection (a).

#### (c) Strategy requirement

Not later than 60 days after December 18, 2014, the President shall submit a strategy to carry out the activities set forth in subsection (a) to—

(1) the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and

(2) the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.

#### (d) Transparency requirements

Any assistance provided pursuant to this section shall be conducted in as transparent of a manner as possible, consistent with the nature and goals of this section. The President shall provide a briefing on the activities funded by this section at the request of the committees specified in subsection (c).

(Pub. L. 113–272, §9, Dec. 18, 2014, 128 Stat. 2964.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under subsec. (c) of this section delegated to Secretary of State by Memorandum of President of the United States, Feb. 19, 2015, 80 F.R. 12071, set out as a note under section 8925 of this title.
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Techprecision Corporation (the
“Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis A. Winoski, the
Interim Chief Executive Officer, and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:






(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and






(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated:
      June 24, 2009
            /s/ Louis A.
      WinoskiLouis
      A. WinoskiInterim
      Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      June 24, 2009
            /s/ Richard F.
FitzgeraldRichard
      F. FitzgeraldChief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Richard F. Welch, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing general partner,
Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Richard F. Welch                                                                                                                 
|Richard F. Welch Chairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officerof the Managing General Partner August 14,
2007
### §6964. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 2001, and each fiscal year thereafter, such sums as may be necessary for the Task Force to carry out the functions described in section 6962 of this title.

(Pub. L. 106–286, div. B, title V, §504, Oct. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 904.)
#### § 418.2332 Can you request a reconsideration when you believe that the CMS information we used is incorrect?

If you request a reconsideration solely because you believe that the information that CMS gave us about your participation in a Medicare prescription drug coverage plan is incorrect, we will dismiss your request for a reconsideration and notify you that you must contact CMS to get your records corrected. Our dismissal of your request for reconsideration is not an initial determination subject to further administrative or judicial review.
#### In the Matter of Elmer Haslett against G. Joseph Minetti, as Commissioner of the Department of Marine and Aviation of The City of New York.

Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 519.]
#### Jacob Greenberg, Respondent, v. Lena Schwartz, Appellant.

In an action to remove a cloud on title, defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The fact that plaintiff executed the mortgage which he now seeks to remove as a cloud on title does not deprive him of the right to maintain the action. *(Stokes*v. *Houghton,*16 App. Div. 381.) Although this action was commenced eleven years after the execution and delivery of the mortgage, it is not barred by the Statute of Limitations. Where the action is brought by an owner in possession, the right is a continuing one which may be asserted at any time during the existence of the cloud. A different rule applies where the action is by an owner not in possession. *(Ford*v. *Glendenin,*215 N. Y. 10.) Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21409]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on Homeless Veterans will be held from Monday, 
October 25, 2004, through Wednesday, October 27, 2004, in Room 427 at 
the Doubletree Hotel, 3203 Quebec Street, Denver, CO 80207. On October 
25, the session will convene at 1 p.m. and end at 4:30 p.m. On October 
26-27, the sessions will convene at 8 a.m. The session will end at 4 
p.m. on October 26 and at 12 noon on October 27. The meeting is open to 
the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs with an ongoing assessment of the effectiveness of the 
policies, organizational structures, and services of the Department in 
assisting homeless veterans. The Committee shall assemble and review 
information relating to the needs of homeless veterans and provide 
ongoing advice on the most appropriate means of providing assistance to 
homeless veterans. The Committee will make recommendations to the 
Secretary regarding such activities.
    In the morning of October 25, the Committee will tour Chronic 
Homeless Initiative and Homeless Grant and Per Diem Programs in Denver, 
Colorado. In the afternoon, the Committee will receive follow-up 
information about improving access to mental health and substance abuse 
services, review of initiatives for veterans who have been 
incarcerated, and review VA's Compensated Work Therapy Program. On 
October 26, the Committee will receive reports and follow-up 
information in response to its 2004 Annual Report to the Secretary. On 
October 27, the Committee will continue to receive reports and hold 
discussions on issues of housing, employment, healthcare and overall 
coordination of services for homeless veterans.
    Those wishing to attend the meeting should contact Mr. Pete 
Dougherty, Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 273-5764. No time will 
be allocated for receiving oral presentations during the public 
meeting. However, the Committee will accept written comments from 
interested parties on issues affecting homeless veterans. Such comments 
should be referred to the Committee at the following address: Advisory 
Committee on Homeless Veterans, Homeless Veterans Programs Office 
(075D), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: September 13, 2004.

    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-21409 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
#### Thomas Potts, Respondent, v. Georgie Pardee, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that the evidence is insufficient to show that the defendant was responsible for the chauffeur’s negligence.
#### § 620.2 Definitions.

As used in this part—

*Applicant* means an individual who files an initial claim for unemployment compensation under State law. Applicant excludes an individual already found initially eligible and filing a continued claim.

*Controlled substance* means a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in schedule I, II, III, IV, or V of part B of 21 U.S.C. 801 *et seq.,* as defined in Sec. 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802). The term does not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, or tobacco, as those terms are defined or used in subtitle E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

*Occupation* means a position or class of positions with similar functions and duties. Federal and State laws governing drug testing refer to classes of positions that are required to be drug tested. Other taxonomies of occupations, such as those in the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) system, may be used by States in determining the boundaries of a position or class of positions with similar functions and duties under § 620.3. Use of the SOC codes, however, is not required, and States may use other taxonomies to identify a position or class of positions with similar functions and duties.

*Suitable work* means suitable work as defined by the unemployment compensation law of a State against which the claim is filed. It must be the same definition the State law otherwise uses for determining the type of work an individual must seek, given the individual's education, experience, and previous level of remuneration.

*Unemployment compensation* means any cash benefits payable to an individual with respect to the individual's unemployment under the State law (including amounts payable under an agreement under a Federal unemployment compensation law).
June 1, 2015

Mr. Matt Anderson Fort Walton Beach , FL 32548 Dear Mr. Anderson : This letter is to inform y ou that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). I t explains why we can’t pr ocess y our request, gives y ou some important information about how we have handled similar requests, and tells y ou what y ou should do in the next 30 day s. **Why We Can’t Process Your Request** We entered y our May

11 , 2015, exemption request i nto the public do cket No. FAA - 2015 - 1309 , but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any

further, y ou must send us all of the followin g:  Your full mailing address .  The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.  The reasons the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety

or how the exemption would provide a level of safety

at least equal to that provided by the rule from which y ou seek an exemption.  Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request.  The specific reasons y ou need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the Unit ed States, if applicable. **If We Don’t Hear From You** If we don’t hear from you within 30 day s from the date of this letter , we will clos e the docket without further contact .2

If y ou have any

questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267 - 9677. Sincer ely , /s/ James M. Crotty Manager, Aircraft and Airports Rules Division Enclosure § 11.813

Project No.: AXX - xx - xxx - E Project Officer: _______________ ARM - 207:FShaver:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx ARM - 1/200/207:Program Office [or specific OPR routing sy mbo l] [ Insert Stylewriter Score Here ] [I NSERT ENVEL OPE ADDRESS HERE]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 211

 186

 194

 195

 182

 179

 162

 160

 142

 150

 155

 192

 224

 251

 230

 241

 256

 225

 224

 214

 197

 181

 194

 181

 200

 186

 230

 243

 200

 213

 230

 125

 118

 120

 107

 109

 97

 92

 89

 91

 76

 83

 74

 85

 88

 94

 105

 82

 94

 83

 89

 94

 93

 97

 83

 76

 72

 79

 86

 74

 82

 86

 156

 148

 146

 146

 141

 127

 119

 118

 117

 115

 115

 126

 141

 148

 150

 162

 154

 140

 141

 136

 135

 138

 146

 141

 128

 120

 129

 137

 127

 136

 140

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER