alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §706. Operative effect dependent upon Presidential finding

This chapter shall be operative with respect to the military, naval, or air forces of any foreign state only after a finding and declaration by the President that the powers and privileges provided herein are necessary for the maintenance of discipline. The President may at any time revoke such finding and declaration.

(June 30, 1944, ch. 326, §6, 58 Stat. 645.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Proclamation No. 2626

Proc. No. 2626, Oct. 12, 1944, 9 F.R. 12403, respecting activation by President, was revoked by Proc. No. 3107, Aug. 9, 1955, 20 F.R. 5805.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

### ******************************************* 

## * * In the matter of 

# RECEIVED SEP

**~** 

## 9Z015 HEARING DOCKET

SCHUMAN AVIATION COMPANY, LTD. 

## * * FDMS No. FAA 2013-0180 

### * * NOTICE OF APPEAL 

### * * 

## * ******************************************* Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, Federal Aviation Administration

COMES NOW, the Team Manager for the Western Enforcement Team, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and files his Notice ofAppeal inthe above-captioned Matter, pursuant to Rule 13.233 ofthe Rules ofPractice for FAA Civil Penalty Actions.
Respectfully submitted,



### ~?



# Ca~aki, Team Manager EnforcementDivision, Western Enforcement Team P. 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-20007 email: Carey.Terasaki@faa.gov Telephone: (310) 725-7100 (main) (310) 725-7108 (direct) (310) 725-6816 (fax) Dated: September 2, 2015Certificate ofService I hereby certifY that onthis date I haveplaced inthe United States mail, postage prepaid, the executed original and one copy ofthe NOTICE OF APPEAL, addressed as follows:

and a copy to: Federal Aviation Administration Attn: Appellate Docket Clerk, Adjudication Branch, AGC-430 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Also via facsimile to: 202-267-1293

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20, Room Ell-310 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Also via e-mail to: Richard.Goodwin@dot.gov Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov
I further certifY that on this date I have placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail-return receipt requested, a true copy ofthe above, addressed as follows:

Dated: September 2, 2015 Christopher D. Ferrara, Esq. 3555 Harding Avenue, Suite 2F Honolulu, HI 96816 Also via e-mail to: chris@ferraralawhawaii.com

# a~.~a~~ Agnes b!lane Legal Technician Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Western-Pacific Region Lawndale, California
<page>
			EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund II (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry, Chief
Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.







By: /s/ Kevin Perry

Name:	   Kevin Perry
Title:  Chief Financial Officer

Date:	May 15, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 802.89

 802.96

 803.03

 803.10

 803.17

 803.27

 803.37

 803.46

 804.27

 806.16

 807.27

 807.57

 807.67

 807.76

 807.80

 807.83

 807.84

 807.87

 807.91

 807.91

 807.93

 807.95

 807.96

 808.00

 808.02

 808.03

 808.77

 810.12

 14.08

 14.12

 14.16

 14.21

 14.25

 14.31

 14.38

 14.43

 14.95

 16.19

 16.94

 17.15

 17.22

 17.28

 17.31

 17.33

 17.34

 17.36

 17.39

 17.39

 17.40

 17.41

 17.42

 17.45

 17.46

 17.47

 17.99

 18.97

STORAGE

+0.04

+0.04

+0.04

+0.04

+0.04

+0.06

+0.06

+0.06

+0.51

+1.24

+0.76

+0.21

+0.07

+0.06

+0.03

+0.02

+0.01

+0.02

+0.03

+0.00

+0.01

+0.01

+0.01

+0.03

+0.01

+0.01

+0.52

+0.98

CHANGE

30

33

33

33

33

42

42

38

269

635

392

116

46

43

24

22

15

22

26

12

19

19

16

26

19

16

274

503

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

OUTLET

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .05

 .06

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .07

 .10

 .08

 .10

 .07

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 .08

 .18

 .64

 .35

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 2.60

 .24

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2014 RUN DATE: 05/02/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +4.92 2,798 280 0 29 1.24 4.46

ACRE-FEET +4,920 5,550 555 0 58

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 555

 555

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.46

JULY 1, 2013 5.23

 14.04

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             165
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                       212
<INVENTORY>                                        472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,921
<PP&E>                                           5,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,226
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           384
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,060
<SALES>                                            765
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,328
<CGS>                                              670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    239
<INCOME-TAX>                                        96
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                144
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       144
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04


</TABLE>
#### Revelone, Inc., Appellant, v. Arlind Realty Corporation et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

On the present state of the record, summary judgment dismissing the complaint should not have been granted. We do not determine the sufficiency of the writings now in the record to satisfy the requirements of section 259 of the Real Property Law. Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the motion denied. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 958.]
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.70 Audits. The CO may conduct audits of adjudicated temporary employment certification applications. ( a ) *Discretion.* The CO has the sole discretion to choose the applications selected for audit.
( b ) *Audit letter.* Where an application is selected for audit, the CO will send an audit letter to the employer and a copy, if appropriate, to the employer's attorney or agent. The audit letter will: ( 1 ) Specify the documentation that must be submitted by the employer;
( 2 ) Specify a date, no more than 30 calendar days from the date the audit letter is issued, by which the required documentation must be sent to the CO; and
( 3 ) Advise that failure to fully comply with the audit process may result: ( i ) In the requirement that the employer undergo the assisted recruitment procedures in § 655.71 in future filings of H-2B temporary employment certification applications for a period of up to 2 years, or
( ii ) In a revocation of the certification and/or debarment from the H-2B program and any other foreign labor certification program administered by the Department Labor.
( c ) *Supplemental information request.* During the course of the audit examination, the CO may request supplemental information and/or documentation from the employer in order to complete the audit. If circumstances warrant, the CO can issue one or more requests for supplemental information.
( d ) *Potential referrals.* In addition to measures in this subpart, the CO may decide to provide the audit findings and underlying documentation to DHS, WHD, or other appropriate enforcement agencies. The CO may refer any findings that an employer discouraged a qualified U.S. worker from applying, or failed to hire, discharged, or otherwise discriminated against a qualified U.S. worker to the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Office of Special Counsel for Unfair Immigration Related Employment Practices.
### §9806. Implementation

The President, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, the Secretary of Defense, the heads of other relevant Federal departments and agencies, relevant United States ambassadors, USAID mission directors, geographic combatant commanders, and other relevant individuals with responsibility over activities in each priority country or region selected pursuant to section 9804 of this title, shall ensure that—

(1) the Global Fragility Strategy required under section 9803 of this title, including each of the country plans developed under section 9805 of this title, is implemented, updated, and coordinated on a regular basis; and

(2) the strategy is used to guide United States Government policy at a senior level and incorporated into relevant strategies and plans across the United States Government such that the activities of all relevant Federal departments and agencies are consistent with the strategy.

(Pub. L. 116–94, div. J, title V, §507, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3065.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 HAS BEEN RESTATED TO REFLECT THE MERGER WITH M-R
GROUP PLC, ACCOUNTED FOR AS A POOLING-OF-INTERESTS.  SEE PART I, ITEM 1, NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - NOTE 2. AMOUNTS ARE UNAUDITED.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,530
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,649
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               150,866
<PP&E>                                         133,157
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 506,789
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,441
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           176
<OTHER-SE>                                     326,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   506,789
<SALES>                                        362,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,367
<CGS>                                          227,304
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,605
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,535
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,422
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,422
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48


</TABLE>
#### Jacob H. Weisz, Appellant, v. R. M. K. Realty Corp. et al., Respondents.

Order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, affirmed,, with $10 costs and disbursements, and without prejudice *782to the prosecution in the proper court of an action at law for the recovery of the $200 deposit. No opinion. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adél and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Officer's
        Certificate
 
 BSABS
        2005-HE4, BSABS 2005-HE5, BSABS 2005-HE6
 
 I,
        Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President of EMC Mortgage Corporation, do hereby
        certify to the designated Master Servicer that in respect to the period ending
        November 30, 2005, a review of the activities of EMC Mortgage Corporation
        ("EMC") during the preceding fiscal year or applicable portion thereof and
        it's
        performance under the above referenced Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
        been
        made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based
        on
        such review, EMC has fulfilled **** all
        of
        its obligations under this Agreement
        throughout such year, or, if there has been a default in the fulfillment
        of any
        such obligation, specifying each such default known to such Servicing Officer
        and the nature and status thereof except for such defaults as such officer
        in
        its good faith judgment believe to be immaterial.
 
 
 /s/
        Sue Stepanek
 Sue
        Stepanek, Executive Vice President
 
 2/14/06
 Date
 
 
 
 
 
 Two
                  MacArthur Ridge 909 Hidden Ridge Drive, Suite 200 Irving, Texas
                  75038Mailing
                  Address: P.O. Box 141358, Irving, Texas
                  75014-1358
### §44b. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XV, §1532(b)(4), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1733

Section, Pub. L. 94–454, §1, Oct. 2, 1976, 90 Stat. 1518, related to collection of fees from members of Soldiers' Home.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective one year after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 1541(a) of Pub. L. 101–510, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 401 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



I, Paul E. Martin, the Principal Financial Officer of Enstar Income Program 1984-1, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission:

- fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/  Paul E. MartinPaul E. MartinPrincipal Financial OfficerMay 17, 2004
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUsing Neural Networks for Sensor ValidationThis paper presents the results of applying two different types of neural networks in two different approaches to the sensor validation problem. The first approach uses a functional approximation neural network as part of a nonlinear observer in a model-based approach to analytical redundancy. The second approach uses an auto-associative neural network to perform nonlinear principal component analysis on a set of redundant sensors to provide an estimate for a single failed sensor. The approaches are demonstrated using a nonlinear simulation of a turbofan engine. The fault detection and sensor estimation results are presented and the training of the auto-associative neural network to provide sensor estimates is discussed.Document ID19980209658Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMattern, Duane L.*(Scientific Monitoring, Inc. Tempe, AZ United States)*Jaw, Link C.*(Scientific Monitoring, Inc. Tempe, AZ United States)*Guo, Ten-Huei*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Graham, Ronald*(Allison Engine Co. Indianapolis, IN United States)*McCoy, William*(Allison Engine Co. Indianapolis, IN United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1998Subject CategoryAircraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberAIAA Paper 98-3547E-11258NASA/TM-1998-208483NAS 1.15:208483Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Cleveland, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 12, 1998End Date: July 15, 1998Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Society for Electrical Engineers,American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 519-30-53Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980209658.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Northern Explorations Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: June 23, 2008


/s/ Richard Novis
-----------------------------------
Richard Novis, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 26,348 14,969 22,123

2 23,547 14,687 20,343

3 23,194 14,130 18,967

4 21,959 13,508 18,115

5 23,765 13,832 18,814

6 25,308 15,400 19,781

7 25,477 15,153 20,502

8 27,942 15,342 21,211

9 24,904 13,207 20,168

10 23,966 12,812 18,939

11 24,408 12,622 19,337

12 24,585 12,857 19,868

13 23,816 12,824 19,339

14 23,859 12,327 19,140

15 23,631 11,502 18,711

16 22,886 11,718 18,274

17 21,781 12,666 18,533

18 23,623 14,063 18,922

19 23,635 14,914 19,006

20 24,511 15,959 19,596

21 25,524 16,048 20,295

22 26,632 15,848 21,114

23 27,549 15,864 21,730

24 28,003 15,470 21,894

25 28,170 15,677 22,307

26 28,624 15,509 22,740

27 28,426 15,814 22,737

28 27,459 15,777 22,762

29 25,212 16,382 21,535

30 23,773 15,423 20,704

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Port Chicago Bottom In Suisun Bay

Period: November 2022 Run Date: 12/8/2022
### §2778a. Exportation of uranium depleted in the isotope 235

Upon a finding that an export of uranium depleted in the isotope 235 is incorporated in defense articles or commodities solely to take advantage of high density or pyrophoric characteristics unrelated to its radioactivity, such exports shall be exempt from the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.] and of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978 [22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.] when such exports are subject to the controls established under the Arms Export Control Act [22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.] or the Export Administration Act of 1979.

(Pub. L. 96–533, title I, §110, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3138.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, referred to in text, is act Aug. 1, 1946, ch. 724, as added by act Aug. 30, 1954, ch. 1073, §1, 68 Stat. 919, which is classified principally to chapter 23 (§2011 et seq.) of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2011 of Title 42 and Tables.

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–242, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 120, which is classified principally to chapter 47 (§3201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3201 of this title and Tables.

The Arms Export Control Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 90–629, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1320, which is classified principally to this chapter (§2751 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2751 of this title and Tables.

The Export Administration Act of 1979, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–72, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 503, which was classified principally to chapter 56 (§4601 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1766(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232, except for sections 11A, 11B, and 11C thereof (50 U.S.C. 4611, 4612, 4613).

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the International Security and Development Cooperation Act of 1980, and not as part of the Arms Export Control Act which comprises this chapter.