alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Israel VALENCIA-ESPINDOLA, Defendant — Appellant.

No. 04-30293.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 16, 2005.

Decided Oct. 19, 2005.

*145Gregory M. Shogren, Esq., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Yakima, WA, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Anne Walstrom, Esq., K. Elizabeth Dahlstrom, Esq., Federal Defenders of Eastern Washington & Idaho, Yakima, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge, ALARCON and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Israel Valencia-Espindola appeals the 57-month sentence imposed after pleading guilty to unlawful re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742.

Valencia-Espindola first contends that when the district court increased his sentence beyond the two-year maximum in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines on the basis of a prior felony conviction, the district court should have required proof beyond a reasonable doubt of the nature and fact of the prior conviction. This contention lacks merit because the fact of the prior conviction may be found by a judge alone. *See United, States v. Von Brown,*417 F.3d 1077, 1079-80 (9th Cir.2005); *United States v. Quintana-Quintana,*383 F.3d 1052, 1053 (9th Cir.2004). We have considered and reject Valencia-Espindola’s argument that *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998) has been overruled by *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), or subsequent Supreme Court precedent. *See Quintana-Quintana,*383 F.3d at 1053 (‘We have repeatedly acknowledged that *Apprendi*carves out an exception for the fact of a prior conviction.”).

Valencia-Espindola next contends that the district court miscalculated his criminal history score by improperly determining that his two prior misdemeanor *146convictions for driving without a valid operator’s license added two criminal history points pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c). The district court did not err in including these prior convictions in calculating the criminal history score because the definition of “prior sentence” in the Guidelines include suspended sentences. U.S.S.G. §§ 4Al.l(c), 4A1.2(a)(3); *United States v. Williams,*291 F.3d 1180, 1194-95 (9th Cir. 2002) (explaining that suspended sentences count for criminal history purposes pursuant to § 4A1.2(a)(3)). Our decision in *Williams*is binding.

We have held that “where the district court did not treat the sentencing guidelines as advisory but the defendants’s sentence was not enhanced by extra-verdict findings,” a nonconstitutional sentencing error has occurred. *See United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1084 n. 8 (9th Cir.2005). We therefore remand to the district court so that the parties may notify it whether it should resentence Valencia-Espindola pursuant to the procedures set forth in *Ameline. Id.*at 1084-85.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REMANDED IN PART.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### [§§181 to 190. Renumbered §§601 to 610]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Subchapter II heading "INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE" was struck out and sections 181 to 190, which comprised subchapter II of this chapter, were renumbered sections 601 to 610, respectively, and transferred to follow the analysis of chapter 6 of this title, by Pub. L. 109–59, title I, §1602(b)(6)(B), (d), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1247, as amended by Pub. L. 110–244, title I, §101(f), June 6, 2008, 122 Stat. 1574.
#### § 703.106 Certificate of authority to write insurance.

No corporation, company, association, person, or fund shall write insurance under this Act without first having received from the OWCP a certificate of authority to write such insurance. Any such certificate issued by the Office, after application therefor in accordance with these regulations, may authorize the applicant to write such insurance in a limited territory as determined by the Office. Any such certificate may be suspended or revoked by the Office prior to its expiration for good cause shown, but no suspension or revocation shall affect the liability of any carrier already incurred. Good cause shall include, without limitation, the failure to maintain in such limited territory a regular business office with full authority to act on all matters falling within the Act, and the failure to promptly and properly perform the carrier's responsibilities under the Act and these regulations, with special emphasis upon lack of promptness in making payments when due, upon failure to furnish appropriate medical care, and upon attempts to offer to, or urge upon, claimants inequitable settlements. A hearing may be requested by the aggrieved party and shall be held before the Director or his representative prior to the taking of any adverse action under this section.
•

'.

Dale Morris

Regional Vice presIdent, Government Affairs

Amerlcan Eagle & Regional Communitles

AmericanAirlines ,~ .

June 6, 2013

Brooke Chapman

Associate Director

Small Community Air Service Development

Office of Aviatibn Analysis

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Room W86-307

Dear Ms. Chapman,

»'

.f?

N

.c:

On behalf of American Airlines, I am pleased to provide this letter in support of the Del Rio

International Airport (ORT) Small Community Air Service Development Grant Application.

The,Del Rio International Airport, the only airport serving the Border Region in Southwest Texas

between Laredo and El Paso has applied for a SCASD grant with the funds primarily intended to

establish a new air service route with the focus being on a Dallas Fort Worth International

connection. -

As a Regional International Airport along the TexaslMexico border, representatives from the City of

Del Rio and their neighboring City of Ciudad Acuna Mexico approached American Airlines recently

to discuss the possibility of establishing a new air service route with a focus on a DFW connection.

American Airlines is committed to providing access to more choices aild increased service across the

company's larger worldwide network. As part of our plan to expand service from our hubs to offer

increased service to existing markets and service new cities we continually seek opportunities to

provide-our-customers the most connected, comfortable travel experience-evailable.

Although we are in the preliminary stages of analyzing the Del Rio market area and have made no

commitment at this time to provide service, there are clear indic~torsthat this region may be better

served by focusing on a Dallas Fort Worth connection.

[t is evident that this region has developed a strong PubliclPrivate Partnership that is far reaching to

include International, Regional and Local Community support of this new air service,route.

4333 Amon Carter Blvd

MO 5673

Fort Worth. Texas

817 967 0175 Office

dale,mortiS@aa.com .;".'::'4t
".

It is evident, that the growing international industrial base coupled with the Air Force's largest

training base, Laughlin A.F.B. along with this regions flourishing tourism industry would be well

served through the receipt of the Department of Transportation Small Community Air Service

Development Grant.

We believe that DRT meets the criteria established by the Department of Transportation for

consideration to receive a grant award; therefore we would ask that you give the Del Rio

International Aizport SmalJ Community Air Service Development Grant Application your highest

consideration for funding.

Sincerely,

•

Dale Morris

Regional Vice President, Government Affairs

American Eagle and Regional Communities

2
#### Hector GUZMAN-GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 04-71657, 04-75325.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Dec. 5, 2005.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Jennifer Rotman, Immigrant Law Group LLP, Portland, OR, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Joan E. Smiley, Esq., David V. Bernal, Attorney, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Barry J. Pettinato, Esq., U.S. Department of *841Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: BROWNING, D.W. NELSON, and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Hector Guzman-Gutierrez is a Mexican national who has accrued more than a year of unlawful presence in the United States. Although inadmissible under § 212(a)(9)(C)(i)(I) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(C)(i)(I), Guzman-Gutierrez argued that he was eligible for penalty-fee adjustment of status under INA § 245(i). An Immigration Judge found him to be ineligible and granted him voluntary departure with an alternate order of removal. The Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissed his appeal.

Although Guzman-Gutierrez filed a timely petition for review of the BIA’s decision, he also filed a motion to reopen in which he contended that he was eligible for the extreme hardship waiver of INA § 212(a)(9)(B)(v). The BIA treated this motion as a motion for reconsideration and denied it as untimely.

For the reasons set forth in *Acosta v. Gonzales,*439 F.3d 550 (2006), we reverse the BIA decision on the merits and conclude that Guzman-Gutierrez is eligible for penalty-fee adjustment of status under INA § 245(i).

Since we reverse on the merits, we ordinarily need not reach the issue of denial of his motion for reconsideration. However, to the extent that he raises the extreme hardship waiver issue, it is foreclosed; it was first raised in such motion which was untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after the BIA’s decision. We therefore affirm the BIA’s dismissal of the motion for reconsideration.

REVERSED and REMANDED in part, AFFIRMED in part.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
#### § 802.220 Party not represented by an attorney; informal procedure.

A party to an appeal who is not represented by an attorney shall comply with the procedural requirements contained in this part, except as otherwise specifically provided in § 802.211(e). In its discretion, the Board may prescribe additional informal procedures to be followed by such party.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 56995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21468]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


President's Export Council: Meeting of the President's Export 
Council

AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of an open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Export Council (PEC) will hold a full Council 
meeting to discuss topics related to export expansion. The meeting will 
include discussion of trade priorities and initiatives, the World Trade 
Organization, PEC subcommittee activity and proposed letters of 
recommendation. The PEC was established on December 20, 1973, and 
reconstituted May 4, 1979, to advise the President on matters relating 
to U.S. trade. It was most recently renewed by Executive Order 13316.

DATES: September 29, 2004.

TIME: 9 a.m. to 11 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Room 2237, Rayburn House Office Building, Washington, DC 
20515. This program is physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be submitted no later than September 20, 2004, to 
J. Marc Chittum, President's Export Council, Room 4043, Washington, DC 
20230 (Telephone: 202-482-1124). Seating is limited and will be on a 
first come, first served basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: J. Marc Chittum, President's Export 
Council, Room 4043, Washington, DC 20230 (Phone: 202-482-1124), or 
visit the PEC Web site, http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/pec.

    Dated: September 20, 2004.
J. Marc Chittum,
Staff Director and Executive Secretary, President's Export Council.
[FR Doc. 04-21468 Filed 9-21-04; 12:05 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4618 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4618

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, as the ``Sidney Oslin 
      Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SIDNEY OSLIN SMITH, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES 
              COURTHOUSE.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sidney Oslin Smith, Jr. Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``Sidney Oslin Smith, Jr. Federal Building and 
United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 18, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4618

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, as the ``Sidney Oslin 
      Smith, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
```
§ 684.800 What systems must an Indian and Native American program grantee have in place to administer an Indian and Native American program? ( a ) Each INA program grantee must have a written system describing the procedures the grantee uses for: ( 1 ) The hiring and management of personnel paid with program funds;
( 2 ) The acquisition and management of property purchased with program funds;
( 3 ) Financial management practices;
( 4 ) A participant grievance system which meets the requirements in sec. 181(c) of WIOA and § 683.600 of this chapter; and
( 5 ) A participant records system.
( b ) Participant records systems must include: ( 1 ) A written or computerized record containing all the information used to determine the person's eligibility to receive program services;
( 2 ) The participant's signature certifying that all the eligibility information he or she provided is true to the best of his/her knowledge; and
( 3 ) The information necessary to comply with all program reporting requirements.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 708.65

 709.96

 710.88

 708.07

 709.40

 710.36

 711.14

 711.82

 712.42

 713.01

 708.37

 708.95

 710.29

 710.84

 711.42

 708.19

 709.15

 708.20

 709.05

 709.72

 710.22

 710.72

 711.15

 707.74

 708.68

 709.33

 709.88

 710.36

 710.80

 711.19

 711.55

 823

 860

 887

 807

 844

 872

 895

 916

 934

 951

 815

 832

 870

 886

 904

 810

 837

 811

 834

 853

 868

 883

 896

 798

 824

 842

 858

 872

 885

 897

 908

STORAGE

-61

+37

+27

-80

+37

+28

+23

+21

+18

+17

-136

+17

+38

+16

+18

-94

+27

-26

+23

+19

+15

+15

+13

-98

+26

+18

+16

+14

+13

+12

+11

CHANGE

-10

20

14

-17

19

15

13

12

10

10

-22

16

20

9

10

-22

15

-2

13

11

9

9

8

-22

14

10

9

8

8

7

7

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 1

 0

 23

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 47

 7

 1

 1

 1

 25

 1

 11

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 27

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0935

 0930

 0925

 1030

TIME

 .06

 .05

 .06

 .09

COPPER

 .32

 .32

 .33

 .40

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 2, 2010

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +24 201 0 183

ACRE-FEET +24 399 0 363

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 363

 363

 884

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .002

 .002

 .002

 .002

 .001

 .001

 .002
================================================================================



                                  Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Theodore Tsagkaris.,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report on Form  10-KSB of Tari Inc.,  for the fiscal  year ended  March 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Tari Inc.

Date:  March 13, 2007


/s/ Theodore Tsagkaris

------------------------------
Theodore Tsagkaris
Secretary, Treasurer & C.F.O.
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
#### In the Matter of the Claim of J. Nelson Abrams, Appellant, against County of Albany et al., Respondents. State Industrial Board, Respondent.

*886Hill, P. J., Crapser, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., taking no part.
October 2022

STORAGE ACRE-FEET SAN LUIS RELEASE - C.F.S. GAIN(+) OR EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY

ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING 

C.F.S

POWER PACHECO

TUNNEL

SPILL LOSS(-) C.F.S. C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

585,114

1 407.64 584,949 -165 0 0 161 0 78 108 0.40 0.00

2 407.46 583,457 -1,492 0 530 161 0 -61 80 0.30 0.00

3 407.27 581,884 -1,573 0 528 167 0 -97 75 0.28 0.00

4 406.97 579,404 -2,480 0 1,054 186 0 -10 75 0.28 0.00

5 406.69 577,093 -2,311 0 922 166 0 -78 53 0.20 0.00

6 406.30 573,879 -3,214 0 1,585 156 0 121 77 0.29 0.00

7 405.74 569,277 -4,602 0 2,102 160 0 -58 112 0.42 0.00

8 405.08 563,870 -5,407 0 2,617 163 0 53 85 0.32 0.00

9 404.61 560,032 -3,838 0 1,953 154 0 172 87 0.33 0.00

10 404.21 556,773 -3,259 0 1,560 159 0 76 87 0.33 0.00

11 403.63 552,060 -4,713 0 1,540 158 0 -677 92 0.35 0.00

12 403.23 548,818 -3,242 0 1,732 159 0 256 86 0.33 0.00

13 403.03 547,200 -1,618 0 520 144 0 -152 84 0.32 0.00

14 402.62 543,889 -3,311 0 1,559 154 0 44 66 0.25 0.00

15 402.07 539,458 -4,431 0 2,072 147 0 -15 65 0.25 0.00

16 401.48 534,720 -4,738 0 2,177 144 0 -67 62 0.24 0.00

17 401.07 531,437 -3,283 0 1,543 145 0 33 70 0.27 0.00

18 400.65 528,082 -3,355 0 1,540 130 0 -22 39 0.15 0.00

19 400.03 523,143 -4,939 0 2,540 141 0 191 46 0.18 0.00

20 399.33 517,588 -5,555 0 2,676 140 0 15 74 0.29 0.00

21 399.07 515,530 -2,058 0 950 141 0 53 77 0.30 0.00

22 399.07 515,530 0 0 0 113 0 113 82 0.32 0.00

23 398.93 514,423 -1,107 0 383 102 0 -74 74 0.29 0.00

24 398.49 510,951 -3,472 0 1,651 103 0 4 76 0.30 0.00

25 398.19 508,588 -2,363 0 1,013 114 0 -64 53 0.21 0.00

26 398.14 508,195 -393 0 0 106 0 -92 56 0.22 0.00

27 397.94 506,623 -1,572 0 510 111 0 -171 61 0.24 0.00

28 397.65 504,346 -2,277 0 1,000 128 0 -20 51 0.20 0.00

29 397.36 502,073 -2,273 0 1,020 111 0 -15 56 0.22 0.00

30 397.33 501,838 -235 532 507 111 0 -32 71 0.28 0.00

31 397.24 501,134 -704 719 1,014 172 0 113 73 0.29 0.00

TOTALS -83,980 1,251 38,798 4,407 0 -383 2,253 8.65 0.00

ACRE-FEET -83,980 2,482 76,958 8,742 0 -762 4,469

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 76,958 Spill 0

Pacheco Tunnel 8,742

Total 85,700

Precipitation

This month = 0.00

October 01, 2022 To date = 0.00

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/5/2024
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 737.09

 737.56

 739.78

 741.00

 733.23

 727.90

 721.96

 720.83

 721.78

 722.58

 723.25

 723.87

 724.40

 724.88

 725.34

 725.73

 726.10

 726.46

 726.77

 727.05

 727.35

 727.57

 727.80

 728.04

 728.30

 728.50

 728.67

 728.82

 728.96

 729.08

 1,890

 1,913

 2,019

 2,080

 1,715

 1,489

 1,258

 1,216

 1,251

 1,280

 1,306

 1,329

 1,350

 1,368

 1,386

 1,401

 1,416

 1,430

 1,443

 1,454

 1,466

 1,475

 1,485

 1,495

 1,505

 1,514

 1,520

 1,527

 1,532

 1,537

STORAGE

-85

+23

+106

+61

-365

-226

-231

-42

+35

+29

+26

+23

+21

+18

+18

+15

+15

+14

+13

+11

+12

+9

+10

+10

+10

+9

+6

+7

+5

+5

CHANGE

82

75

53

41

11

10

2

11

18

15

13

12

11

9

9

8

8

7

7

6

6

5

5

5

5

5

3

4

3

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 125

 63

 0

 10

 195

 124

 118

 32

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 1, 2014

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -438 452 0 667

ACRE-FEET -438 897 0 1,323

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,323

 1,323

 1,975

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
June 2024

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

2,107

1 737.83 1,926 -181 7 98 0

2 733.90 1,745 -181 5 96 0

TOTALS -362 12 194 0

ACRE-FEET -362 24 385 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 385

Spill 0

Total 385

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 6/3/2024