alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 667.272 What wage and labor standards apply to participants in activities under title I of WIA? ( a ) Individuals in on-the-job training or individuals employed in activities under title I of WIA must be compensated at the same rates, including periodic increases, as trainees or employees who are similarly situated in similar occupations by the same employer and who have similar training, experience and skills. Such rates must be in accordance with applicable law, but may not be less than the higher of the rate specified in section 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) or the applicable State or local minimum wage law.
( b ) Individuals in on-the-job training or individuals employed in programs and activities under Title I of WIA must be provided benefits and working conditions at the same level and to the same extent as other trainees or employees working a similar length of time and doing the same type of work.
( c ) Allowances, earnings, and payments to individuals participating in programs under Title I of WIA are not considered as income for purposes of determining eligibility for and the amount of income transfer and in-kind aid furnished under any Federal or Federally assisted program based on need other than as provided under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*). (WIA sec. 181(a)(2).)
#### Lucio A. BARROGA, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 05-55232.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*778Lucio A. Barroga, Glendora, CA, Pro Se.

Kyungah Suk, Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Lucio A. Barroga appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his request that a three-judge panel of the district court consider whether he properly served the summons and complaint. Barroga’s request for a three-judge panel followed the district judge’s denial of Barroga’s motion for entry of default judgment. As the district court’s order did not end the proceedings, and is not an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
### §288i. Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China; extension of privileges and immunities to members

Under such terms and conditions as he shall determine and consonant with the purposes of this section, the President is authorized to extend to the Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China in Washington and to the members thereof the same privileges and immunities subject to corresponding conditions and obligations as are enjoyed by diplomatic missions accredited to the United States and by members thereof.

(Pub. L. 93–22, Apr. 20, 1973, 87 Stat. 24.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the International Organizations Immunities Act which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 11771

Ex. Ord. No. 11771, Mar. 18, 1974, 39 F.R. 10415, which extended diplomatic privileges and immunities to the Liaison Office of the People's Republic of China in Washington, D.C., was revoked by Ex. Ord. No. 12553, Feb. 25, 1986, 51 F.R. 7237.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         140,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  902,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    447,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,763,245
<PP&E>                                         198,479
<DEPRECIATION>                                  99,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,751,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,220,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,694,525
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,065
<OTHER-SE>                                     107,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,751,128
<SALES>                                      2,580,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,580,507
<CGS>                                        1,428,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,428,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,228,128
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (32,452)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,994)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,994)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.12)


</TABLE>
### §9532. Rule of construction

Nothing in this part or the amendments made by this part shall be construed—

(1) to supersede the limitations or exceptions on the use of rocket engines for national security purposes under section 1608 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. "Buck" McKeon National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291; 128 Stat. 3626; 10 U.S.C. 2271 note), as amended by section 1607 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 (Public Law 114–92; 129 Stat. 1100) and section 1602 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Public Law 114–328; 130 Stat. 2582); or

(2) to prohibit a contractor or subcontractor of the Department of Defense from acquiring components referred to in such section 1608.

(Pub. L. 115–44, title II, §238, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 922.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, is part 2 (§§221–238) of subtitle A of title II of Pub. L. 115–44, which enacted this part and sections 8909 and 8910 of this title and amended sections 8901, 8907, 8908, 8923, 8924 of this title. For complete classification of part 2 to the Code, see Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 729.45

 729.44

 729.43

 729.42

 729.41

 729.40

 729.48

 729.55

 729.59

 729.62

 729.64

 729.65

 729.67

 729.70

 729.73

 729.75

 729.76

 729.78

 729.79

 729.81

 729.82

 729.84

 729.85

 729.86

 729.87

 729.88

 729.88

 729.89

 729.91

 729.92

 729.95

 1,553

 1,552

 1,552

 1,552

 1,551

 1,551

 1,554

 1,557

 1,559

 1,560

 1,561

 1,561

 1,562

 1,563

 1,565

 1,566

 1,566

 1,567

 1,567

 1,568

 1,568

 1,569

 1,570

 1,570

 1,571

 1,571

 1,571

 1,571

 1,572

 1,573

 1,574

STORAGE

+0

-1

+0

+0

-1

+0

+3

+3

+2

+1

+1

+0

+1

+1

+2

+1

+0

+1

+0

+1

+0

+1

+1

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+1

+1

+1

CHANGE

0

-1

0

0

-1

0

2

2

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2016

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +21 17 0 0

ACRE-FEET +21 34 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 1,553

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
November 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

1,890

1 737.15 1,893 3 2 0 0

2 737.22 1,897 4 2 0 0

3 737.31 1,901 4 2 0 0

4 737.40 1,905 4 2 0 0

5 737.51 1,910 5 3 0 0

6 737.65 1,917 7 4 0 0

7 737.73 1,921 4 2 0 0

8 737.81 1,925 4 2 0 0

9 734.50 1,772 -153 3 80 0

10 734.56 1,774 2 1 0 0

11 734.62 1,777 3 2 0 0

12 734.67 1,779 2 1 0 0

13 731.81 1,653 -126 -4 60 0

14 728.45 1,511 -142 -8 64 0

15 728.55 1,516 5 3 0 0

16 728.68 1,521 5 3 0 0

17 728.79 1,525 4 2 0 0

18 731.60 1,644 119 60 0 0

19 731.98 1,660 16 8 0 0

20 732.15 1,668 8 4 0 0

21 732.29 1,674 6 3 0 0

22 732.41 1,679 5 3 0 0

23 732.52 1,684 5 3 0 0

24 732.62 1,688 4 2 0 0

25 732.70 1,692 4 2 0 0

26 732.79 1,696 4 2 0 0

27 732.87 1,699 3 2 0 0

28 732.96 1,703 4 2 0 0

29 733.09 1,709 6 3 0 0

30 733.21 1,714 5 3 0 0

TOTALS -176 119 204 0

ACRE-FEET -176 236 405 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 405

Spill 0

Total 405

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 12/10/2023
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4466 

To exempt the Lower Bois d’Arc Creek Reservoir Project from the Federal 

Water Pollution Control Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2016 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. SESSIONS, and Mr. RATCLIFFE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To exempt the Lower Bois d’Arc Creek Reservoir Project 

from the Federal Water Pollution Control Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Texas Reservoir 

5 Approval Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOWER BOIS D’ARC CREEK RESERVOIR PROJECT, 

7 FANNIN COUNTY, TEXAS. 

8 The Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 

9 1251 et seq.) shall not apply with respect to the construc10 tion of, impoundment of water in, and operation of, the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4466 IH

1 Lower Bois d’Arc Creek Reservoir Project, including any 

2 associated water transmission facilities, by the North 

3 Texas Municipal Water District in Fannin County, Texas. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4437 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4437

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To extend the deadline for the submittal of the final report required 
                       by the Commission on Care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL OF FINAL REPORT BY 
              COMMISSION ON CARE.

    Section 202(b)(3)(B) of the Veterans Access, Choice, and 
Accountability Act of 2014 (Public Law 113-146; 128 Stat. 1773) is 
amended by striking ``Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
initial meeting of the Commission'' and inserting ``Not later than June 
30, 2016''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 9, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4437

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To extend the deadline for the submittal of the final report required 
                       by the Commission on Care.
```
#### Louis P. Roberts, Appellant, Respondent, v. James C. Spencer, Respondent, Appellant, Impleaded with Otto E. Gearing, Respondent.

As to defendant Spencer, judgment and order affirmed, with costs. As to defendant Gearing, judgment and order reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. No opinion. Order to be settled on notice. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4411 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2016 

Mr. GRIFFITH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12737, the 

8 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

9 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

10 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requireVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:02 Feb 02, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4411.IH H4411

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4411 IH

1 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

2 under that section, extend the time period during which 

3 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

4 the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 

5 the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued 

6 by the Commission. 

7 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

8 period required for commencement of construction of the 

9 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

11 reinstate the license for the project effective as of the date 

12 of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expira14 tion. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEVATION

 252.50

 252.51

 252.50

 252.52

 252.56

 252.45

 252.50

 252.54

 252.50

 252.52

 252.60

 252.51

 252.52

 252.50

 252.50

 252.51

 252.50

 252.51

 252.49

 251.51

 252.46

 252.59

 252.52

 252.46

 252.50

 252.52

 252.53

 252.51

 252.50

 252.54

 3,924

 3,928

 3,924

 3,933

 3,953

 3,899

 3,924

 3,943

 3,924

 3,933

 3,973

 3,928

 3,933

 3,924

 3,924

 3,928

 3,924

 3,928

 3,919

 3,454

 3,904

 3,968

 3,933

 3,904

 3,924

 3,933

 3,938

 3,928

 3,924

 3,943

STORAGE

-34

+4

-4

+9

+20

-54

+25

+19

-19

+9

+40

-45

+5

-9

+0

+4

-4

+4

-9

-465

+450

+64

-35

-29

+20

+9

+5

-10

-4

+19

CHANGE

 1,013

 1,138

 1,169

 1,208

 1,216

 1,240

 1,245

 1,110

 1,102

 1,245

 1,228

 1,225

 1,212

 1,144

 1,013

 1,070

 1,065

 1,112

 1,131

 1,185

 1,362

 1,384

 1,352

 1,343

 1,275

 1,183

 1,193

 653

 614

 928

 9,990

 10,230

 10,590

 10,110

 9,990

 10,930

 12,150

 12,150

 12,390

 12,510

 14,310

 13,950

 13,590

 13,230

 9,990

 13,470

 14,670

 14,670

 14,530

 14,430

 13,230

 14,670

 14,670

 12,990

 14,070

 14,190

 14,430

 15,030

 15,030

 14,790

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 16, 2001

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -15 34,358 390,980

ACRE-FEET -15 68,149 775,509

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 847,131

 3,958

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 70

 68

 57

 53

 69

 68

 68

 58

 70

 62

 37

 39

 60

 48

 70

 76

 61

 43

 61

 75

 76

 74

 104

 80

 45

 47

 45

 27

 13

 27

 1,751

 3,473

CORNING CANAL 3,473

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 68,149

TO SACTO RIVER 775,509

Table 9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         300,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               300,088
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,476,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,522
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,442,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,476,299
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,731
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                57,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,611)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.005)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.005)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.140 Review of applications. ( a ) *NPC review.* The CO will promptly review the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and job order for compliance with all applicable program requirements, including compliance with the requirements set forth in this subpart, and make a decision to issue a NOD under § 655.141, a Notice of Acceptance (NOA) under § 655.143, or a Final Determination under § 655.160.
( b ) *Mailing and postmark requirements.* Any notice or request sent by the CO(s) to an employer requiring a response will be sent electronically or via traditional methods to assure next day delivery using the address, including electronic mail address, provided on the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification.* The employer's response to such a notice or request must be filed electronically or via traditional methods to assure next day delivery. The employer's response must be sent by the date due or the next business day if the due date falls on a Sunday or Federal holiday.
#### § 641.305 Who is responsible for developing and submitting the State Plan?

The Governor, or the highest governmental official, of each State is responsible for developing and submitting the State Plan to the Department.
### §8515. Prohibition on procurement contracts with persons that export sensitive technology to Iran

#### (a) In general

Except as provided in subsection (b), and pursuant to such regulations as the President may prescribe, the head of an executive agency may not enter into or renew a contract, on or after the date that is 90 days after July 1, 2010, for the procurement of goods or services with a person that exports sensitive technology to Iran.

#### (b) Authorization to exempt certain products

The President is authorized to exempt from the prohibition under subsection (a) only eligible products, as defined in section 2518(4) of title 19, of any foreign country or instrumentality designated under section 2511(b) of title 19.

#### (c) Sensitive technology defined

#### (1) In general

The term "sensitive technology" means hardware, software, telecommunications equipment, or any other technology, that the President determines is to be used specifically—

(A) to restrict the free flow of unbiased information in Iran; or

(B) to disrupt, monitor, or otherwise restrict speech of the people of Iran.

#### (2) Exception

The term "sensitive technology" does not include information or informational materials the exportation of which the President does not have the authority to regulate or prohibit pursuant to section 1702(b)(3) of title 50.

#### (d) Government Accountability Office report on effect of procurement prohibition

Not later than 1 year after July 1, 2010, the Comptroller General of the United States shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees, the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate, and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives, a report assessing the extent to which executive agencies would have entered into or renewed contracts for the procurement of goods or services with persons that export sensitive technology to Iran if the prohibition under subsection (a) were not in effect.

(Pub. L. 111–195, title I, §106, July 1, 2010, 124 Stat. 1336.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 8551(a) of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Memorandum of President of the United States, Sept. 23, 2010, 75 F.R. 67025, set out as a note under section 8501 of this title.
### §1037. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–457, §7, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 556, which provided for payment of costs incurred in the preparation of the roll and in the payment of the per capita shares by withdrawals from the judgment fund of the appropriate band, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
(No. 74-CC-508

#### London Suburan Service, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 17, 1974.*

*363London Suburban Service, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.