alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Francis A. Rebello, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Southern Sauce Company,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
     business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
     fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
     affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
     issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
     over financial reporting.

Date: February 10, 2006

/s/ Francis A. Rebello
----------------------
Francis A. Rebello
Treasurer
**Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-131647) pertaining to the Tronox Incorporated 2005 Long TermIncentive Plan of our reports dated March 15, 2007, with respect to the consolidated and combinedfinancial statements and schedule of Tronox Incorporated, Tronox Incorporated management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Tronox Incorporated, included in the Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ ERNST& YOUNG LLP  Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
### §128. Public hearings

(a) Any State transportation department which submits plans for a Federal-aid highway project involving the by passing of or, going through any city, town, or village, either incorporated or unincorporated, shall certify to the Secretary that it has had public hearings, or has afforded the opportunity for such hearings, and has considered the economic and social effects of such a location, its impact on the environment, and its consistency with the goals and objectives of such urban planning as has been promulgated by the community. Any State transportation department which submits plans for an Interstate System project shall certify to the Secretary that it has had public hearings at a convenient location, or has afforded the opportunity for such hearings for the purpose of enabling persons in rural areas through or contiguous to whose property the highway will pass to express any objections they may have to the proposed locations of such highway. Such certification shall be accompanied by a report which indicates the consideration given to the economic, social, environmental and other effects of the plan or highway location or design and various alternatives which were raised during the hearing or which were otherwise considered.

(b) When hearings have been held under subsection (a), the State transportation department shall submit a copy of the transcript of said hearings to the Secretary, together with the certification and report.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 902; Pub. L. 90–495, §24, Aug. 23, 1968, 82 Stat. 828; Pub. L. 91–605, title I, §135, Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1734; Pub. L. 105–178, title I, §1212(a)(2)(A)(i), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 193.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–178 substituted "State transportation department" for "State highway department" wherever appearing.

1970—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 91–605, §135(a), provided for submission of a report by the State highway department involved indicating consideration given to economic, social, environmental, and other effects of the plan or highway location or design plus the various alternatives which were considered.

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 91–605, §135(b), inserted reference to report to be submitted by the State highway department together with the certification of public hearings.

1968—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 90–495 inserted social effect of projects, the impact on environment, and their consistency with the goals and objectives of such urban planning as has been promulgated by the community to the list of factors to be considered by State highway departments in looking over projects involving the bypassing or passing through of municipalities.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1968 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 90–495 effective Aug. 23, 1968, see section 37 of Pub. L. 90–495, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 813.35

 812.90

 812.45

 811.98

 811.50

 811.04

 810.62

 810.15

 809.64

 809.10

 808.54

 807.98

 807.37

 806.83

 806.47

 806.10

 805.73

 805.36

 805.00

 804.65

 804.25

 803.84

 803.15

 802.10

 801.00

 799.90

 798.73

 797.45

 796.16

 795.30

 794.15

 21.45

 21.09

 20.74

 20.37

 20.01

 19.66

 19.34

 18.99

 18.62

 18.23

 17.83

 17.44

 17.01

 16.64

 16.40

 16.15

 15.90

 15.65

 15.42

 15.19

 14.93

 14.67

 14.24

 13.59

 12.94

 12.30

 11.65

 10.96

 10.29

 9.86

 9.30

STORAGE

-0.37

-0.36

-0.35

-0.36

-0.37

-0.35

-0.31

-0.35

-0.37

-0.39

-0.40

-0.40

-0.43

-0.37

-0.24

-0.25

-0.25

-0.24

-0.24

-0.23

-0.26

-0.26

-0.43

-0.65

-0.66

-0.64

-0.66

-0.69

-0.67

-0.43

-0.56

CHANGE

147

152

152

144

141

152

131

148

137

127

122

126

111

116

180

176

177

180

184

193

177

174

87

-24

-33

-31

-46

-68

-62

37

-162

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 323

 322

 320

 318

 318

 318

 282

 318

 318

 318

 318

 318

 318

 295

 295

 295

 295

 295

 295

 303

 300

 300

 298

 295

 293

 285

 280

 275

 270

 250

 113

OUTLET

 10

 9

 9

 10

 9

 9

 7

 6

 7

 6

 6

 7

 7

 8

 8

 7

 7

 8

 8

 5

 7

 6

 7

 6

 5

 5

 4

 5

 5

 4

 5

C.F.S.

 .39

 .34

 .34

 .40

 .36

 .39

 .28

 .27

 .29

 .25

 .27

 .32

 .32

 .35

 .36

 .34

 .33

 .36

 .38

 .22

 .32

 .29

 .33

 .30

 .27

 .28

 .24

 .30

 .29

 .28

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2013 RUN DATE: 10/11/2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -12.54 3,045 9,141 0 212 9.76 .00

ACRE-FEET -12,540 6,040 18,131 0 421

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 18,131

 18,131

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2013 .00

 21.81

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
June 29, 2015

Mr. Mike Harvey

1591 Tank Farm Road

Glenrock, WY 82637

Dear Mr. Harvey:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 13, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

0645), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
### §168. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(c), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3379

Section, acts Mar. 6, 1920, ch. 94, 41 Stat. 513; June 10, 1921, ch. 18, title III, §304, 42 Stat. 24; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §11(a), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2422, 54 Stat. 1236; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §5, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Oct. 17, 1979, Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), 93 Stat. 695, related to readjustment of salaries and credit to accounts of disbursing agent of Saint Elizabeths Hospital.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 709.18

 707.18

 711.58

 732.42

 732.07

 730.07

 727.15

 725.39

 723.21

 721.74

 719.24

 715.92

 711.69

 708.28

 707.43

 709.77

 709.47

 710.72

 711.68

 710.65

 708.63

 709.70

 710.49

 709.34

 712.19

 717.85

 718.90

 718.58

 716.10

 712.23

 712.67

 838

 782

 908

 1,679

 1,664

 1,579

 1,458

 1,388

 1,304

 1,249

 1,159

 1,045

 912

 813

 789

 855

 846

 883

 911

 881

 823

 853

 876

 843

 927

 1,110

 1,147

 1,135

 1,051

 928

 941

STORAGE

+10

-56

+126

+771

-15

-85

-121

-70

-84

-55

-90

-114

-133

-99

-24

+66

-9

+37

+28

-30

-58

+30

+23

-33

+84

+183

+37

-12

-84

-123

+13

CHANGE

6

-16

83

453

62

27

8

35

28

42

25

11

-1

-6

9

33

8

20

15

2

-8

16

13

1

43

157

91

66

27

6

73

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 12

 19

 64

 70

 70

 69

 70

 70

 70

 70

 68

 66

 44

 21

 0

 13

 1

 1

 17

 21

 1

 1

 18

 1

 65

 72

 72

 69

 68

 66

 1100

 1010

 0920

 1110

TIME

 .13

 .14

 .19

 .08

COPPER

 .26

 .32

 .48

 .24

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2008 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 8, 2008

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +113 1,329 0 1,270

ACRE-FEET +113 2,636 0 2,519

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,519

 2,519

 828

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .005

 .004

 .004

 .004

Table 7
§ 702.146 Source of the special fund. ( a ) All amounts collected as fines and penalties under the several provisions of the Act shall be paid into the special fund (33 U.S.C. 44(c)(3)).
( b ) Whenever an employee dies under circumstances creating a liability on an employer to pay death benefits to the employee's beneficiaries, and whenever there are no such beneficiaries entitled to such payments, the employer shall pay $5,000 into the special fund (Act, section 44(c)(1)). In such cases, the compensation order entered in the case shall specifically find that there is such liability and that there are no beneficiaries entitled to death benefits, and shall order payment by the employer into the fund. Compensation orders shall be made and filed in accordance with the regulations in subpart C of this part 702, except that for this purpose the district director settling the case under § 702.315 shall formalize the memorandum of conference in a compensation order, and shall file such order as provided for in § 702.349.
( c ) The Director annually shall assess an amount against insurance carriers and self-insured employers authorized under the Act and part 703 of this subchapter to replenish the fund. That total amount to be charged all carriers and self-insurers to be assessed shall be based upon an estimate of the probable expenses of the fund during the calendar year. The assessment against each carrier and self-insurer shall be based upon ( 1 ) the ratio of the amount each paid during the prior calendar year for compensation in relation to the amount all such carriers of self-insurers paid during that period for compensation, and
( 2 ) the ratio of the amount of payments made by the special fund for all cases being paid under section 8(f) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 908(f), during the preceding calendar year which are attributable to the carrier or self-insurer in relation to the total of such payments during such year attributable to all carriers and self-insurers. The resulting sum of the percentages from paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) of this section will be divided by two, and the resulting percentage multiplied by the probable expenses of the fund. The Director may, in his or her discretion, condition continuance or renewal of authorization under part 703 upon prompt payment of the assessment. However, no action suspending or revoking such authorization shall be taken without affording such carrier or self-insurer a hearing before the Director or his/her designee.
[38 FR 26861, Sept. 26, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 395, Jan. 3, 1985; 51 FR 4282, Feb. 3, 1986]
### §3357. Findings and statement of policy

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds the following:

(1) Advancing peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific has been a central element of United States foreign policy toward the region.

(2) The Government of the People's Republic of China (PRC), especially since the election of Tsai Ing-Wen in 2016, has conducted a coordinated campaign to weaken Taiwan diplomatically, economically, and militarily in a manner that threatens to erode United States policy and create a fait accompli on questions surrounding Taiwan's future.

(3) To secure United States interests and preserve the ability of the people of Taiwan to determine their own future, it is necessary to reinforce Taiwan's diplomatic, economic, and territorial space.

#### (b) Statement of policy

It is the policy of the United States to—

(1) maintain the position that peace and stability in the Western Pacific are in the political, security, and economic interests of the United States, and are matters of international concern; and

(2) work with allies and partners to promote peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific and deter military acts or other forms of coercive behavior that would undermine regional stability.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LV, §5511, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3308.)
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

May 7, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Toyota Meeting with EPA Regarding Proposal for 2017-2025 Light-Duty (LD) 

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Standards

FROM: Robin Moran, Senior Policy Advisor

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

This memo documents meetings held on January 6 and 12, 2012 between representatives of 

Toyota, EPA, and NHTSA to discuss Toyota’s comments on the LD GHG proposed rule. The 

meeting attendees included the following:

Toyota: Rick Gezelle and Matt Kevnick

EPA: Bill Charmley, Robin Moran, Arvon Mitcham, Christopher Lieske, Brian Nelson

NHTSA: Jim Tamm, Rebecca Yoon

The topics discussed included off-cycle credits, upstream emissions from electric vehicles, 

relative stringency between the EPA-NHTSA programs, mid-term review, air conditioning 

credits, and pickup truck hybrid credits.
Exhibit 32.2 

**Certification Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2005 (the“Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: 

   (1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

   (2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
#### § 402.25 Referral of requests outside of SSA.

If you request records that were created by, or provided to us by, another Federal agency, and if that agency asserts control over the records, we may refer the records and your request to that agency. We may likewise refer requests for classified records to the agency that classified them. In these cases, the other agency will process and respond to your request, to the extent it concerns those records, under that agency's regulation, and you need not make a separate request to that agency. We will notify you when we refer your request to another agency.
§ 702.203 Employer's report; how given. ( a ) The employer must file its report of injury with the district director.
( b ) If the employer sends its report of injury by U.S. postal mail or commercial delivery service, the report will be considered filed on the date that the employer mails the document or gives it to the commercial delivery service. If the employer sends its report of injury by a permissible electronic method, the report will be considered filed on the date that the employer completes all steps necessary for the transmission.
[80 FR 12929, Mar. 12, 2015]
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Shengkai Innovations, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Ming He, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





Dated: September 26, 2011
By:
/s/ David Ming HeDavid Ming He

Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial and accounting officer)
### §424. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–107, div. A, title XIV, §1410(a)(5), Dec. 28, 2001, 115 Stat. 1266

Section, Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XV, §1524, as added Pub. L. 106–398, §1 [[div. A], title IX, §915], Oct. 30, 2000, 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–231, related to conditional supervisory control of Retirement Home Board by Secretary of Defense.
Exhibit 24.5

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of
NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Jason W. Bixby, Douglas K. Cooper, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, with full power to act without the others, as
my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in connection with the Form 10-K,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of
Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 17th day of March, 2008.



/s/ Gerald Porter StrongSignature


PrintName:

Gerald Porter Strong