alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2.250 Petitions for amendment: Action on appeals. ( a ) *Authority.* Appeals from decisions on initial petitions for amendment shall be decided for the Department by the Assistant Secretary—Policy, Budget and Administration or an official designated by the Assistant Secretary, after consultation with the Solicitor.
( b ) *Time limit.* ( 1 ) A final determination on any appeal shall be made within thirty (30) working days after receipt of the appeal.
( 2 ) The thirty (30) day period for decision on an appeal may be extended, for good cause shown, by the Secretary of the Interior. If the thirty (30) day period is extended, the individual submitting the appeal shall be notified of the extension and of the date on which a determination on the appeal is expected to be dispatched.
( c ) *Form of decision.* ( 1 ) The final determination on an appeal shall be in writing and shall state the basis for the determination.
( 2 ) If the determination upholds, in whole or part, the initial decision rejecting the petition for amendment, the determination shall also advise the individual submitting the appeal: ( i ) Of his or her right to file a concise statement of the reasons for disagreeing with the decision of the agency;
( ii ) Of the procedure established by § 2.77 for the filing of the statement of disagreement;
( iii ) That the statement which is filed will be made available to anyone to whom the record is subsequently disclosed together with, at the discretion of the Department, a brief statement by the Department summarizing its reasons for refusing to amend the record;
( iv ) That prior recipients of the challenged record will be provided a copy of any statement of dispute to the extent that an accounting of disclosure was maintained; and
( v ) Of his or her right to seek judicial review of the Department's refusal to amend the record.
( 3 ) If the determination reverses, in whole or in part, the initial decision rejecting the petition for amendment, the system manager responsible for the system containing the challenged record shall be directed to: ( i ) Amend the challenged record accordingly; and
( ii ) If an accounting of disclosures has been made, advise all previous recipients of the record of the amendment and its substance.
[40 FR 44505, Sept. 26, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 56586, Dec. 22, 1983; 53 FR 3750, Feb. 9, 1988]
#### Rose Quaytman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mark Quaytman, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Long Island Rail Road Company, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Lewis, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Alberto RODRIGUEZ-RESENDIZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40864.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mario Alberto Rodriguez-Resendiz appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after a previous deportation. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Rodriguez-Resendiz’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Rodriguez-Resendiz contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *AlmendarezTorres*in light of *Apprendi*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Rodriguez-Resendiz properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              69
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                      4,316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,037
<PP&E>                                          19,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,045
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,320
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,045
<SALES>                                         19,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,625
<CGS>                                            8,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     7
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,306
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49


</TABLE>
#### § 668.820 What rules apply to administrative costs under the INA program?

The definition and treatment of administrative costs are covered in 20 CFR 667.210(b) and 667.220.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 791.93

 791.89

 791.87

 791.83

 791.78

 791.74

 791.70

 791.63

 791.61

 791.58

 791.55

 791.50

 791.42

 791.36

 791.30

 791.27

 791.23

 791.19

 791.17

 791.16

 791.24

 791.34

 791.44

 791.92

 802.94

 807.32

 808.85

 809.85

 810.85

 811.68

 812.41

 8.29

 8.27

 8.27

 8.25

 8.23

 8.21

 8.19

 8.16

 8.15

 8.14

 8.13

 8.11

 8.07

 8.05

 8.02

 8.01

 7.99

 7.97

 7.96

 7.96

 7.99

 8.04

 8.08

 8.29

 14.11

 16.98

 18.05

 18.77

 19.51

 20.14

 20.71

STORAGE

-0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.02

-0.03

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.03

-0.03

-0.03

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

-0.01

+0.00

+0.03

+0.04

+0.04

+0.21

+5.82

+2.87

+1.08

+0.72

+0.74

+0.63

+0.56

CHANGE

1

-1

2

-1

-4

-1

-3

-12

2

-1

0

-3

-9

-5

-6

-1

-3

-3

1

3

21

27

27

109

2,939

1,450

546

369

379

320

289

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 2

 4

 4

 4

 4

 5

 6

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

OUTLET

 4

 4

 3

 4

 3

 4

 2

 1

 2

 2

 3

 4

 3

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 0

 1

 2

 0

 0

 2

 1

 1

 3

 1

 2

C.F.S.

 .28

 .26

 .24

 .27

 .24

 .27

 .15

 .10

 .15

 .16

 .19

 .28

 .21

 .16

 .24

 .18

 .17

 .15

 .11

 .10

 .00

 .04

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .03

 .04

 .12

 .03

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .24

 .47

 .13

 1.55

 2.65

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

OCTOBER 2021 RUN DATE: 11/18/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +12.39 6,432 118 0 66 4.44 5.11

ACRE-FEET +12,390 12,758 234 0 131

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 234

 234

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.11

JULY 1, 2021 5.39

 8.31

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 5.11
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May
9, 2008


/s/ Ann F.
Massey
 Name: Ann
F. Massey
 Title:
Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.80

 130.92

 130.89

 130.81

 130.81

 130.83

 130.81

 130.80

 130.67

 130.65

 130.75

 130.77

 130.60

 130.49

 130.46

 130.54

 130.36

 130.48

 130.44

 130.07

 129.87

 130.34

 130.42

 130.42

 130.19

 130.18

 129.77

 129.46

 129.49

 129.76

 130.20

 667

 680

 677

 668

 668

 670

 668

 667

 652

 650

 662

 664

 644

 632

 629

 637

 619

 631

 627

 588

 567

 616

 625

 625

 600

 599

 557

 527

 530

 556

 601

STORAGE

+11

+13

-3

-9

+0

+2

-2

-1

-15

-2

+12

+2

-20

-12

-3

+8

-18

+12

-4

-39

-21

+49

+9

+0

-25

-1

-42

-30

+3

+26

+45

CHANGE

268

269

252

231

221

214

205

195

187

189

192

207

229

255

280

245

191

182

86

20

15

45

44

50

37

49

41

46

47

45

43

INFLOW

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 30

 20

 20

 20

 39

 50

 50

 50

 31

 20

 20

 20

 20

PUTAH

 228

 228

 220

 201

 186

 178

 171

 161

 160

 155

 150

 171

 204

 226

 248

 207

 166

 142

 58

 20

 6

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 31

 41

 25

 12

 0

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .11

 .12

 .13

 .19

 .14

 .15

 .18

 .14

 .17

 .30

 .42

 .38

 .28

 .25

 .08

 .10

 .13

 .11

 .08

 .07

 .07

 .06

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .10

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .08

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .69

 1.18

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .00

 .94

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2004 RUN DATE: 11/16/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -55 4,580 3,595 1,002 12 4.25 3.19

ACRE-FEET -55 9,084 7,131 1,987 24

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,987

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 7,131

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.19

JULY 1, 2004 3.31

 656

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.39

 129.62

 129.82

 130.31

 130.00

 129.75

 129.83

 129.95

 129.79

 129.63

 129.61

 129.60

 129.59

 129.98

 130.21

 130.47

 130.55

 130.63

 130.64

 130.58

 130.39

 130.28

 130.22

 130.11

 129.62

 129.52

 129.51

 129.50

 129.38

 129.89

 129.94

 622

 543

 562

 613

 581

 556

 563

 576

 559

 544

 542

 541

 540

 579

 602

 630

 639

 648

 649

 642

 622

 610

 603

 592

 543

 533

 532

 531

 520

 569

 574

STORAGE

-8

-79

+19

+51

-32

-25

+7

+13

-17

-15

-2

-1

-1

+39

+23

+28

+9

+9

+1

-7

-20

-12

-7

-11

-49

-10

-1

-1

-11

+49

+5

CHANGE

101

65

115

131

70

59

56

56

46

54

64

64

64

71

50

47

50

50

53

51

45

44

41

52

30

43

44

44

497

130

111

INFLOW

 85

 85

 85

 85

 66

 52

 32

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 31

 25

 25

 25

 25

 483

 78

 78

PUTAH

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 24

 30

 37

 40

 40

 40

 26

 13

 8

 20

 20

 27

 30

 30

 25

 20

 27

 30

 23

 20

 20

 20

 27

 30

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .07

 .06

 .10

 .08

 .02

 .02

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .00

 .07

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .02

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .02

INCHES

 .44

 .83

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .60

 .18

 .00

 .10

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .57

 .26

 .00

 .35

 1.45

 .29

 .13

 .00

 .00

 .73

 2.77

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 RUN DATE: 01/02/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -56 2,398 767 1,660 0 .99 9.49

ACRE-FEET -56 4,756 1,521 3,293 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,293

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 1,521

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 9.49

JULY 1, 2003 11.69

 630

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martin Kremenstein, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: March 29, 2013 |  |  |  | /s/ Martin Kremenstein 
|                      |  |  |  | Martin Kremenstein     
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### John P. McGrath, Respondent, v. Carl Johnson et al., Copartners under the Name of Johnson & Olsen, Appellants.

Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Close, P. J., and Lewis, J., dissent and vote to affirm, with the following memorandum: The failure of defendants to appear on the closing day and their neglect to exercise the option within a reasonable time thereafter, as found by the Trial Judge, justify the judgment for plaintiff.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

      ( print page 24946)    
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that members of the Commission and/or Commission staff may attend the following meetings:

North American Electric Reliability Corporation, Member Representatives Committee and Board of Trustees Meetings.

Westin Arlington Gateway, 801 North Glebe Road, Arlington, Virginia 22203.

## May 8 (1 p.m.-5 p.m.) and 9 (8 a.m.-1 p.m.), 2012

                    Further information regarding these meetings may be found at:                     *http://www.nerc.com/​calendar.php*.                

The discussions at the meetings, which are open to the public, may address matters at issue in the following Commission proceedings:

Docket No. RC08-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RC11-1, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RC11-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RC11-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RC11-6, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RR08-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RR12-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RR12-4, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RR12-5, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RD09-11, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RD10-2, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RD11-3, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RD11-10, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. RD12-1, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

Docket No. NP11-238, North American Electric Reliability Corporation.

                    For further information, please contact Jonathan First, 202-502-8529, or                     *jonathan.first@ferc.gov*.                

Dated: April 19, 2012.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-10074 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### §4853. Security requirements for contractors

Not later than 90 days after August 27, 1986, the Secretary of State shall issue regulations to—

(1) strengthen the security procedures applicable to contractors and subcontractors involved in any way with any diplomatic construction or design project; and

(2) permit a contractor or subcontractor to have access to any design or blueprint relating to such a project only in accordance with those procedures.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title IV, §403, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 865.)
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 7, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

 [DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-12575 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00305-VMC-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERT EUGENE MARTIN, 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(June 7, 2012)

Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Robert Eugene Martin in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because an

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Martin’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.16

 130.28

 130.10

 129.62

 129.55

 130.12

 130.15

 130.10

 130.10

 130.33

 130.37

 130.46

 130.11

 129.87

 129.69

 129.67

 129.75

 129.58

 129.11

 128.80

 128.76

 128.80

 128.82

 128.87

 128.95

 128.99

 129.03

 129.10

 129.24

 129.49

 129.71

 597

 610

 591

 543

 536

 593

 596

 591

 591

 615

 620

 629

 592

 567

 550

 548

 556

 539

 495

 467

 463

 467

 469

 473

 481

 484

 488

 494

 507

 530

 552

STORAGE

+26

+13

-19

-48

-7

+57

+3

-5

+0

+24

+5

+9

-37

-25

-17

-2

+8

-17

-44

-28

-4

+4

+2

+4

+8

+3

+4

+6

+13

+23

+22

CHANGE

81

80

108

141

154

162

127

100

78

77

79

75

64

81

86

87

89

76

56

61

78

87

86

87

89

87

87

88

88

87

84

INFLOW

 25

 25

 54

 80

 85

 80

 75

 53

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

PUTAH

 43

 48

 64

 85

 73

 53

 50

 50

 47

 35

 46

 40

 53

 64

 65

 58

 55

 55

 48

 45

 50

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 55

 51

 45

 43

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .06

 .06

 .09

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .07

 .11

 .15

 .14

 .14

 .08

 .05

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .00

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .05

 .03

 .13

 .09

 .12

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .04

 .03

 1.69

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .40

 .55

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .18

 .02

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

DECEMBER 2007 RUN DATE: 02/14/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -19 2,810 1,651 1,167 1 1.92 3.78

ACRE-FEET -19 5,574 3,275 2,315 2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,315

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,275

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.78

JULY 1, 2007 7.11

 571

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK