alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11

                FINGERHUT COMPANIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                     Computation of Earnings Per Share
             (In thousands of dollars, except per share data)
                                 Unaudited



                              Thirteen Weeks Ended      Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
                              Sept. 27,    Sept. 29,    Sept. 27,    Sept. 29,
                                1996         1995         1996         1995
Primary

    Net earnings (a)         $    8,565   $    8,553   $    8,659   $   20,531

    Weighted average shares
     of common stock
     outstanding             46,181,050   45,897,854   46,224,968   45,798,385

    Common stock equivalents  2,442,968    2,903,193    2,455,177    2,682,917

    Weighted average shares of
     common stock and common
     stock equivalents       48,624,018   48,801,047   48,680,145   48,481,302

    Primary earnings per share
     of common stock and common
     stock equivalents (a/b) $      .18   $      .18   $      .18   $      .42

Fully diluted

    Net earnings (c)         $    8,565   $    8,553   $    8,659   $   20,531
    Weighted average shares
     of common stock
     outstanding             46,181,050   45,897,854   46,224,968   45,798,385
    Common stock
     equivalents              2,444,628    2,961,016    2,498,521    2,877,264

    Weighted average shares of
     common stock and common
     stock equivalents (d)   48,625,678   48,858,870   48,723,489   48,675,649
    Fully diluted earnings per
     share of common stock and
     common stock equivalents
     (c/d)                   $      .18   $      .18   $      .18   $      .42


Common stock equivalents for primary earnings per share are
computed by the treasury stock method using the average market
price.

Common stock equivalents for quarterly fully diluted earnings per
share are computed by the treasury stock method using the ending
market price, average market price for the last month or the average
of the fully diluted monthly amounts used in the quarter, whichever is
higher.

Common stock equivalents for year-to-date fully diluted earnings
per share are computed by the treasury stock method using the
ending market price or the average of the fully diluted monthly
amounts used in the period, whichever is higher.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Energy Resources,
Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Al Rahmani, Principal Accounting Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
      June 30, 2010
            /s/
      Al RahmaniAl
      RahmaniPrincipal
      Accounting Officer




This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not
be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.
§ 2.3 Where should you send a FOIA request? ( a ) The Department does not have a central location for submitting FOIA requests and it does not maintain a central index or database of records in its possession. Instead, the Department's records are decentralized and maintained by various bureaus and offices throughout the country.
( b ) To make a request for Department records, you must write directly to the bureau that you believe maintains those records by utilizing the written forms of submission listed on the Department's FOIA website, *https://www.doi.gov/foia*, or utilizing physical or facsimile addresses of an appropriate FOIA contact, located at *http://www.doi.gov/foia/contacts .*
( c ) Questions about where to send a FOIA request should be directed to the bureau that manages the underlying program or to the appropriate FOIA Requester Center, as discussed in § 2.66 of this part.
[77 FR 76902, Dec. 31, 2012, as amended at 81 FR 11127, Mar. 3, 2016; 84 FR 61826, Nov. 14, 2019]
### SUBCHAPTER XLVI–A—PONCA TRIBE OF NEBRASKA: RESTORATION OF RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DOMINGO ANTONIO LAGOS, a/k/a Mingo, a/k/a

Tony,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-88-138-G, CA-95-662-2)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 20, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Domingo Antonio Lagos, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Lagos, Nos. CR-88-138-G; CA-95-

662-2 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21, 1996). Appellant's motion for appointment

of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 61

 60

 66

 65

 74

 78

 80

 82

 81

 80

 80

 80

 99

 79

 76

 90

 94

 97

 100

 98

 97

 90

 93

 101

 101

 97

 96

 94

 83

 79

 81

 57

 57

 60

 64

 65

 74

 78

 80

 79

 77

 76

 78

 75

 74

 71

 77

 76

 75

 98

 91

 83

 82

 73

 93

 97

 94

 93

 80

 79

 77

 77

 59

 59

 64

 65

 70

 76

 79

 81

 80

 78

 78

 79

 80

 77

 73

 83

 86

 86

 99

 94

 91

 87

 84

 97

 99

 96

 94

 87

 80

 78

 78

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 3, 2018

HIGH LOW MEAN

 52.0

 52.0

 52.3

 52.6

 53.7

 55.1

 56.7

 59.1

 59.7

 58.3

 59.4

 61.5

 61.7

 59.5

 57.3

 57.0

 56.1

 55.1

 56.8

 56.6

 59.0

 60.2

 59.1

 58.7

 59.4

 59.9

 60.9

 63.5

 65.8

 66.8

 67.3

 51.0

 50.8

 50.8

 50.3

 50.5

 51.5

 53.2

 55.1

 56.9

 56.7

 55.2

 57.0

 59.6

 57.6

 55.4

 55.0

 53.6

 52.0

 52.4

 54.9

 54.5

 57.8

 55.7

 56.8

 55.2

 54.8

 55.6

 57.5

 60.0

 61.6

 62.5

 51.4

 51.4

 51.5

 51.4

 52.2

 53.3

 54.9

 57.0

 58.2

 57.7

 57.3

 59.2

 60.6

 58.6

 56.3

 55.8

 54.8

 53.6

 54.6

 55.5

 56.3

 59.0

 57.5

 57.6

 57.2

 57.2

 58.2

 60.4

 62.8

 64.1

 64.9

HIGH LOW MEAN

 11.1

 10.7

 10.5

 10.6

 10.3

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 10.0

 9.9

 9.3

 9.8

 10.3

 10.0

 10.6

 10.8

 10.7

 10.1

 10.3

 10.0

 10.1

 9.2

 9.7

 10.1

 10.2

 10.1

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 10.3

 10.4

 10.1

 10.2

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.2

 9.5

 9.3

 9.1

 9.1

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 10.2

 10.0

 9.6

 9.6

 9.2

 9.2

 8.8

 8.9

 9.2

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 8.8

 8.6

 10.6

 10.5

 10.2

 10.4

 10.0

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.4

 9.4

 9.7

 9.6

 9.2

 9.5

 10.0

 9.9

 10.2

 10.5

 10.3

 9.9

 9.8

 9.6

 9.8

 9.1

 9.3

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.4

 9.2

 9.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 682.305 How does the Department define the term “mass layoff” for the purposes of rapid response? For the purposes of rapid response, the term “mass layoff” used throughout this subpart will have occurred when at least one of the following conditions have been met: ( a ) A layoff meets the State's definition of mass layoff, as long as the definition does not exceed a minimum threshold of 50 affected workers;
( b ) Where a State has not defined a minimum threshold for mass layoff meeting the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, layoffs affecting 50 or more workers; or
( c ) When a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice has been filed, regardless of the number of workers affected by the layoff announced.
(March 19, 1948.)

#### In the Matter of Joseph A. Fogarty, Individually and as City Manager of the City of Newburgh, Appellant, against Herbert A. Warden, Individually and as Mayor of the City of Newburgh, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to review the determination of the Common Council of the City of Newburgh in removing the appellant from his position as City Manager, the petition was dismissed on respondents’ motion, under section 1293 of the Civil Practice Act. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeals is hereby granted. Pending the appeal and conditioned upon diligent prosecution thereof, a stay is granted to appellant. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 707.22

 706.69

 706.58

 708.72

 713.67

 716.08

 717.78

 726.33

 731.78

 728.20

 716.36

 708.56

 712.23

 714.32

 715.89

 717.81

 714.33

 713.83

 707.12

 707.71

 707.61

 707.51

 710.31

 707.36

 711.36

 707.61

 707.52

 707.79

 707.78

 707.87

 707.72

 783

 769

 766

 825

 972

 1,051

 1,108

 1,425

 1,652

 1,501

 1,060

 821

 928

 993

 1,044

 1,109

 994

 978

 780

 797

 794

 791

 870

 787

 902

 794

 792

 799

 799

 801

 797

STORAGE

-13

-14

-3

+59

+147

+79

+57

+317

+227

-151

-441

-239

+107

+65

+51

+65

-115

-16

-198

+17

-3

-3

+79

-83

+115

-108

-2

+7

+0

+2

-4

CHANGE

8

8

11

31

75

40

29

161

183

74

26

0

62

43

36

33

14

185

87

79

52

39

60

10

59

1

22

25

21

19

16

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 15

 15

 13

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 69

 150

 248

 120

 8

 10

 10

 0

 72

 193

 187

 70

 54

 41

 20

 52

 1

 55

 23

 21

 21

 18

 18

 1030

 1050

 1030

 1010

 1005

TIME

 .11

 .06

 .06

 .02

 .80

COPPER

 .45

 .22

 .32

 .24

 .35

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 26, 2005

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1 1,509 0 1,507

ACRE-FEET +1 2,993 0 2,989

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,989

 2,989

 796

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .003

 .004

 .003

 .003

 .002

Table 7
§ 686.760 What services are provided to former enrollees? ( a ) Up to 3 months of employment services, including career services offered through a one-stop center, may be provided to former enrollees.
( b ) According to procedures issued by the Secretary, other career transition services as determined appropriate may be provided to former enrollees.
### §1300f. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 95–375, §1, Sept. 18, 1978, 92 Stat. 712; Pub. L. 103–357, §1(a), Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3418, which related to eligibility of tribe members for services and assistance, administration of tribal lands, and exercise of criminal and civil jurisdiction over such lands, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
§ 725.540 Overpayments. ( a ) *General.* As used in this subpart, the term “overpayment” includes: ( 1 ) Payment where no amount is payable under this part;
( 2 ) Payment in excess of the amount payable under this part;
( 3 ) A payment under this part which has not been reduced by the amounts required by the Act (see § 725.533);
( 4 ) A payment under this part made to a resident of a State whose residents are not entitled to benefits (see §§ 725.402 and 725.403);
( 5 ) Payment resulting from failure to terminate benefits to an individual no longer entitled thereto;
( 6 ) Duplicate benefits paid to a claimant on account of concurrent eligibility under this part and parts 410 or 727 (see § 725.4(d)) of this title or as provided in § 725.309.
( b ) *Overpaid beneficiary is living.* If the beneficiary to whom an overpayment was made is living at the time of a determination of such overpayment, is entitled to benefits at the time of the overpayment, or at any time thereafter becomes so entitled, no benefit for any month is payable to such individual, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, until an amount equal to the amount of the overpayment has been withheld or refunded.
( c ) *Adjustment by withholding part of a monthly benefit.* Adjustment under paragraph (b) of this section may be effected by withholding a part of the monthly benefit payable to a beneficiary where it is determined that: ( 1 ) Withholding the full amount each month would deprive the beneficiary of income required for ordinary and necessary living expenses;
( 2 ) The overpayment was not caused by the beneficiary's intentionally false statement or representation, or willful concealment of, or deliberate failure to furnish, material information; and
( 3 ) Recoupment can be effected in an amount of not less than $ 10 a month and at a rate which would not unreasonably extend the period of adjustment.
( d ) *Overpaid beneficiary dies before adjustment.* If an overpaid beneficiary dies before adjustment is completed under the provisions of paragraph (b) of this section, recovery of the overpayment shall be effected through repayment by the estate of the deceased overpaid beneficiary, or by withholding of amounts due the estate of such deceased beneficiary, or both.