alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§1981 to 1985. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–861, §36A, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1569

Section 1981, acts July 1, 1947, ch. 203, §1, 61 Stat. 243; Mar. 14, 1955, ch. 11, 69 Stat. 11, defined terms used in sections 1981 to 1985 of this title. See section 716 of Title 10, Armed Forces.

Section 1982, act July 1, 1947, ch. 203, §2, as added Mar. 14, 1955, ch. 11, 69 Stat. 11, related to training, attendance, and participation, report to Congress, and to funds and equipment. See section 716 of Title 10.

Section 1983, act July 1, 1947, ch. 203, §3, as added Mar. 14, 1955, ch. 11, 69 Stat. 11, prescribed limitations on expenditure of funds, and related to use of appropriations. See section 716 of Title 10.

Sections 1984, 1985, act July 1, 1947, ch. 203, §§4, 5, as added Mar. 14, 1955, ch. 11, 69 Stat. 11, authorized payment of allowances, travel and transportation, and subsistence and quarters. See section 419 of Title 37, Pay and Allowances of the Uniformed Services.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Note About HARP's State Trimming MethodThis short note provides some additional insight into how the HARP program works. In some cases, it is possible for HARP to tdm away too many states and obtain an optimistic result. The HARP Version 7.0 manual warns the user that 'Unlike the ALL model, the SAME model can automatically drop failure modes for certain system models. The user is cautioned to insure that no important failure modes are dropped; otherwise, a non-conservative result can be given.' This note provides an example of where this occurs and a pointer to further documentation that gives a means of bounding the error associated with trimming these states.Document ID19980201051Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsButler, Ricky W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Hayhurst, Kelly J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Johnson, Sally C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1998Subject CategoryStatistics And ProbabilityReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208427NAS 1.15:208427L-17684Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-33-31-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980201051.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 24-1642

___________________________ 

Eulalia Lourdes Tino-De La Cruz; P.M.Z.T.

 Petitioners 

v.

Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States

 Respondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ 

Submitted: September 10, 2024

Filed: September 13, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRASZ, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Eulalia Lourdes Tino-De La Cruz, on behalf of herself and her child, see 8 

U.S.C. § 1158(b)(3)(A)–(B), challenges the denial of asylum and withholding of 

removal. We have already rejected the argument that a deficient notice to appear 

deprives the immigration court of jurisdiction. See Tino v. Garland, 13 F.4th 708, 

709 (8th Cir. 2021) (per curiam); see also id. at 709 n.2 (concluding that Niz-Chavez 
-2- 

v. Garland, 593 U.S. 155 (2021), “d[id] not . . . disturb[] our jurisdiction-related 

precedent”). And substantial evidence supports the conclusion that any persecution 

she suffered or fears is not “on account of [her] membership in a particular social 

group.”1

 Martinez-Galarza v. Holder, 782 F.3d 990, 993 (8th Cir. 2015) (explaining 

the standard of review and what sorts of persecution qualify). We accordingly deny 

the petition for review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1

Given this conclusion, it is unnecessary to address the other arguments she 

raises. See Tino, 13 F.4th at 710; see also Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 

751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (discussing waiver).
### §§946, 947. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 946, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §541, 60 Stat. 1011, related to appointment of alien clerks and employees.

Section 947, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §542, 60 Stat. 1011, related to assignments and transfers of alien clerks and employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
#### § 726.103 Application for authority to self-insure; effect of regulations contained in this part.

As appropriate, each of the regulations, interpretations and requirements contained in this part 726 including those described in subpart C of this part shall be binding upon each applicant under this subpart, and the applicant's consent to be bound by all requirements of the said regulations shall be deemed to be included in and a part of the application, as fully as though written therein.
#### Moore & Evans, Appellant, v. John Van Praag, an Individual Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Van Praag & Co., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4400 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4400

To expand the tropical disease product priority review voucher program 
                to encourage treatments for Zika virus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2016

Mr. Butterfield (for himself and Mrs. Brooks of Indiana) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To expand the tropical disease product priority review voucher program 
                to encourage treatments for Zika virus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adding Zika Virus to the FDA 
Priority Review Voucher Program Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING TROPICAL DISEASE PRODUCT PRIORITY REVIEW VOUCHER 
              PROGRAM TO ENCOURAGE TREATMENTS FOR ZIKA VIRUS.

    Section 524(a)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 360n) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (R) as subparagraph (S); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (Q) the following:
                    ``(R) Zika virus.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                            LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                         Exhibit to Form 10 - Q

              (For the three months ended March 31, 2003)

                        Exhibit Number (99.2)

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory D. Friedman, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gregory D. Friedman


Gregory D. Friedman, CPA
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary
May 15, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                    ----------------------------------------
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            ---------------------------------------------------------

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  May 16, 2005



BY: /s/ DUANE J. ROTH
    -----------------------
    Duane J. Roth
    Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 24, 2009 

jm 

Order 

 

April 24, 2009 

138643 (18) 

EMMANUEL PALMER, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138643 

 COA: 288473 

PAROLE BOARD, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

 Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $20.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court. 

 If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$355.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court. 

 Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in this 

Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

 The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
#### Joseph P. Day et al., as Trustees, Respondents, v. Morris Walzer et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Bassil I. Dahiyat, Ph.D., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 of Xencor, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
Company's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:



5.     The
Company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



/s/ BASSIL I. DAHIYAT Bassil I. Dahiyat, Ph.D. President & Chief Executive Officer


Date:
March 31, 2014

---



QuickLinks
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 840.59

 840.60

 840.56

 840.47

 840.32

 840.15

 840.00

 839.80

 839.57

 839.35

 839.14

 838.88

 839.22

 839.22

 839.54

 839.74

 839.93

 840.12

 840.29

 840.48

 840.53

 840.58

 840.31

 840.03

 839.92

 840.11

 840.29

 840.48

 840.68

 840.86

 49.86

 49.87

 49.82

 49.70

 49.51

 49.29

 49.09

 48.84

 48.55

 48.27

 48.00

 47.67

 48.10

 48.10

 48.51

 48.76

 49.01

 49.25

 49.47

 49.71

 49.78

 49.84

 49.49

 49.13

 48.99

 49.24

 49.47

 49.71

 49.97

 50.20

STORAGE

+0.07

+0.01

-0.05

-0.12

-0.19

-0.22

-0.19

-0.25

-0.29

-0.28

-0.27

-0.33

+0.43

+0.00

+0.41

+0.26

+0.24

+0.24

+0.22

+0.25

+0.06

+0.07

-0.35

-0.36

-0.14

+0.24

+0.23

+0.25

+0.26

+0.23

CHANGE

340

318

283

247

208

198

206

180

158

178

162

144

228

10

215

141

134

137

122

132

40

269

136

130

110

137

132

141

145

131

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

SPILL

 290

 290

 290

 290

 290

 290

 290

 293

 292

 301

 280

 292

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 225

 300

 300

 167

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 7

 12

 9

 5

 6

 8

 3

 5

 4

 8

 7

 7

 6

 5

 5

 7

 7

 9

 7

 3

 3

 6

 6

 7

 9

 9

 10

 12

 10

 9

C.F.S.

 .17

 .30

 .22

 .12

 .14

 .20

 .08

 .12

 .11

 .19

 .17

 .17

 .15

 .13

 .13

 .17

 .18

 .21

 .16

 .07

 .07

 .14

 .15

 .18

 .23

 .23

 .25

 .29

 .25

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .05

 .62

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2001 RUN DATE: 01/28/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.43 5,112 4,480 210 211 5.21 .73

ACRE-FEET +430 10,140 8,886 417 419

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 417

OUTLET

TOTAL

 8,886

 9,303

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .73

JULY 1, 2000 17.67

 49.79

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
(No. 4310

#### Harvey L. House, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 14, 1950.*

Boy A. Ptacin, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; William H. Sumpter, Assistant Attorney General, for Bespondent.

SOHUMAN, C. J.

Claimant, Harvey L. House, was employed by the Department of Public Welfare at the Chicago State Hospital, Chicago, Hlinois. On the 15th day of April, 1950 he suffered an injury to his right hand by reason of his hand being caught between a table and bench, caused by the patients shoving a table against the bench. There are no jurisdictional questions involved, and it was stipulated and agreed that the injury which the claimant received was in the course of his employment; and, that immediate notice was given, and claim was filed at the proper time. The claimant’s earnings for the year preceding his injury were $1,775.50. The claimant was 38 years of age, and had no children.

Claimant was treated by Dr. Cisman. X-Bays were taken, but were not. introduced in evidence. Claimant *164was also seen by Dr. Albert C. Field, who was the only doctor to testify in the case. Dr. Albert C. Field said that he had examined the claimant on May 24, 1950, and took an X-Ray of his right hand. The X-Ray showed a comminuted fracture of the fifth metacarpal, proximal third, with considerable deformity; that the fragments were not healed, and that the fracture extended into the wrist joint. Dr. Field further stated that the significance of such fracture caused irregularity in the articulating surface, causing an arthritic condition; that the ring finger of the right hand had a limitation in the extension ■ of 30 degrees in the metacarpal and distal phalanges; that the little fipger of the right hand had a limitation of extension of 30 degrees, and that, in his opinion, the condition was permanent. The doctor testified that the man, in his opinion, had a 25 per cent total disability of the right hand. This testimony was not objected to, and, as far as the record is concerned, stands conclusive.

William J. Cleary & Co. filed a claim for stenographic services in the amount of $41.05. The Court finds that this claim is reasonable.

On the basis of this record, we make the following award:

Twenty-five per cent permanent specific loss of the right hand in the sum of $956.25, payable in weekly installments of $22.50; commencing on April 22, 1950. Thirty weeks of said compensation has accrued to November 11, 1950 in the amount of $675.00, and is payable forthwith, the balance of $281.25 is payable at the rate of $22.50 per week, commencing November 18, 1950 for a period of 12 weeks with one final payment of $11.25.

An award is also entered in favor of William J. Cleary & Co. for stenographic services in the amount of'$41.05, which is payable forthwith.

*165This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# Food Insecurity, Chronic Disease, and Health Among Working-Age Adults

Economic Research Report No. (ERR-235) 31 pp, July 2017

by Christian A. Gregory and Alisha  Coleman-Jensen

ERS documents the strong correlation between food security status and chronic health conditions among working age adults living at or below 200 percent of the Federal poverty line.

**Keywords:** Health, chronic disease, food insecurity, self-assessed health, working-age adults, low-income

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Report summary 
-  Download Zip file for ERR-235 

-  Food & Nutrition Assistance 
-  Food & Nutrition Assistance Research 
-  Food Security in the U.S. 
-  Food Choices & Health 
-  Diet Quality & Nutrition 

**Last updated:** Monday, July 31, 2017

**For more information contact:**Christian A. Gregory and Alisha  Coleman-Jensen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999  (Unaudited)  AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS
</LEGEND>

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,541,141
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,689,377
<ALLOWANCES>                                      445,619
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,308,746
<PP&E>                                          2,655,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,002,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,260,423
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             636,760
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           90,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      5,533,472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    6,260,423
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                3,243,056
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                2,400,264
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  135,838
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  1,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   929,186
<INCOME-TAX>                                      362,786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               566,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      566,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .06


</TABLE>