T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s tha tthi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f or ** d e c is io n w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). T L/ R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T D O RI S CA RD O ZA - FU EN TES, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 73151 A ge nc yN o. A 040- 006- 393 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D or i s C ar doz a - F ue nt e s , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her app ea l fr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s orderdenyi ng her app l i cat i on for r el i ef un der f orm er 

# FI LED JAN 21 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST L/ Res ea r ch 07- 73151 2 s e c t i o n 2 1 2 ( c ) , 8 U . S. C. § 1 1 8 2 ( c ) . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o q u e s tio n s o f law a n dc o n s titu tio n a l c la im s . V a s q u ez - Za v a la v . A s h c r o ft , 32 4 F . 3d 11 05 , 11 07 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). W e deny i n p art a n dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e g o v e rn m e n t d idn o t n e e dto c h ar g e C ar d o z a - F u e n te s a s r e m o v ab le pur s uantt o 8 U . S . C . § 1227( a ) ( 2) ( B ) ( i ) i n he rnot i c e t o appe ar( “N T A ” ) f orthe B I A to c o n c lu d e th a t s h e w a s in e lig ib le f o rr e lie f o n th is g r o u n d . See U

ni ted States v . G o n z a lez - V

a le r io , 34 2 F . 3d 10 51 , 10 54 -55 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). C ar do za -F uent es ’ equal prot ec t i on chal l enge fai l s bec ause she w as conv i ct ed bypl e aa gr e e m e nta f

t e rthe e f f e c t i ve da t e of

the A nt i - T e rr or i s m a nd E f f e c t i ve D eath P en al ty A ct(“ A E D P A ”) an di s th erefo re n o tsi m i l arl y si tu at edt o th o se perm anentre si dent s w ho coul d h ave r el i ed up on the avai l abi l i ty of 212 (c ) r el i ef b e c au s e th e ye n te r e dp le a s p r io rto A E D P A ’s p a s s a g e . Se e D i l l i n gh a m v . I NS , 267 F . 3d 996, 1007 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( t o s uc c e e d on an e qua l pr ot e c t i on c ha l l e nge , the pet i t i on erm ustes t abl i sh thathi s tre atm entdi ff er ed fr om thatof si m i l ar l y s i tuat ed p e r s o n s ) . W e n e e dn o t r e a c h C ar d o z a - F u e n te s ’ c o n te n tio n th a t s h e is n o t r e m o v ab le f o rh a v i n g b e e n c o n v i c t e do f a n a g g r a v a t e df

e l o n yu n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 2 7 ( a ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( i i i ) b e c au s e s h e c o n c e d e dr e mo v ab i l i tyu n d e r8 U . S. C.T L/ Res ea r ch 07- 73151 3 § 1 18 2(a) (2)( C ) and the B IA deni ed her appl i cat i on for a21 2(c) w ai ver und er8 U . S . C . § 1 22 7(a) (2)( B )( i ). W e la c kju r is d ic tio n to r e v ie w C ar d o z a - F u e n te s ’ c o n te n tio n th a t th e N T A is d e f i c i e n ta n dth a ts h e i s e l i g i b l e f o rc an c e l l a t i o n o f

r e mo v a l u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 2 9 b ( a ) b e c au s e s h e f a ile dto e x h au s t th e s e a r g u m e n ts b e f o r e th e B I A . See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o

ft , 35 8 F . 3d 67 4, 67 8 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.