alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  April      3, 2008 | /s/      William C. Morro                                                |
|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 | Name:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               | William      C. Morro |
|                                 | Title:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | Chairman,      Chief Executiveand      Chief Financial Officer |
|                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |
#### Paul Darnell TAYLOR, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Director, sued in individual & official capacity; et al., Defendants — Appellees.

No. 03-16793.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Paul Darnell Taylor, Florence, AZ, pro se.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Paul Darnell Taylor, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 1915A, his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against various prison officials alleging denial of due process in disciplinary proceedings. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, *Resnick v. Hayes,*213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir.2000), we affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

The district court properly dismissed Taylor’s due process claims because his challenge to the procedures used in disci*219plinary proceedings that resulted in the loss of good-time credits necessarily implied the invalidity of the punishment imposed. *See Edwards v. Balisok,*520 U.S. 641, 644-48, 117 S.Ct. 1584, 137 L.Ed.2d 906 (1997). We vacate the judgment to the extent it dismisses Taylor’s action with prejudice, and we remand for entry of judgment dismissing the action without prejudice as to the claims barred under *Balisok. See Blueford v. Prunty,*108 F.3d 251, 255 (9th Cir.1997).

To the extent Taylor’s section 1983 claims were also based on the alleged deprivation of his property, the district court properly dismissed them because Taylor had an adequate post-deprivation remedy under Arizona law. *See Barnett v. Centoni,*31 F.3d 813, 815-16 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam); *Howland v. State,*169 Ariz. 293, 818 P.2d 1169, 1172-73 (1991).

Taylor’s remaining contentions lack merit.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1619 When you cannot be considered permanently residing in the United States under color of law.

We will not consider you to be permanently residing in the United States under color of law and you are not eligible for SSI benefits during a period in which you have been granted temporary protected status by the Immigration and Naturalization Service under section 244A of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

[58 FR 41182, Aug. 3, 1993]
(No. 6700

#### Curtis Anderson, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 3, 1972.*

Curtis Anderson, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 663.440 What are the requirements for consumer choice? ( a ) Training services, whether under ITA's or under contract, must be provided in a manner that maximizes informed consumer choice in selecting an eligible provider.
( b ) Each Local Board, through the One-Stop center, must make available to customers the State list of eligible providers required in WIA section 122(e). The list includes a description of the programs through which the providers may offer the training services, the information identifying eligible providers of on-the-job training and customized training required under WIA section 122(h) (where applicable), and the performance and cost information about eligible providers of training services described in WIA sections 122 (e) and (h).
( c ) An individual who has been determined eligible for training services under § 663.310 may select a provider described in paragraph (b) of this section after consultation with a case manager. Unless the program has exhausted training funds for the program year, the operator must refer the individual to the selected provider, and establish an ITA for the individual to pay for training. For purposes of this paragraph, a referral may be carried out by providing a voucher or certificate to the individual to obtain the training.
( d ) The cost of referral of an individual with an ITA to a training provider is paid by the applicable adult or dislocated worker program under title I of WIA.
September 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL

1,664

1 733.12 1,710 46 23 0 0

2 733.33 1,720 10 5 0 0

3 733.45 1,725 5 3 0 0

4 733.56 1,730 5 3 0 0

5 733.65 1,734 4 2 0 0

6 733.74 1,738 4 2 0 0

7 733.81 1,741 3 2 0 0

8 733.87 1,743 2 1 0 0

9 733.93 1,746 3 2 0 0

10 733.98 1,748 2 1 0 0

11 734.03 1,750 2 1 0 0

12 734.09 1,753 3 2 0 0

13 734.15 1,756 3 2 0 0

14 734.21 1,758 2 1 0 0

15 734.25 1,760 2 1 0 0

16 734.28 1,762 2 1 0 0

17 734.31 1,763 1 1 0 0

18 734.37 1,766 3 2 0 0

19 734.44 1,769 3 2 0 0

20 734.50 1,772 3 2 0 0

21 734.53 1,773 1 1 0 0

22 734.56 1,774 1 1 0 0

23 734.61 1,776 2 1 0 0

24 734.66 1,779 3 2 0 0

25 734.71 1,781 2 1 0 0

26 734.77 1,784 3 2 0 0

27 734.81 1,785 1 1 0 0

28 734.87 1,788 3 2 0 0

29 734.91 1,790 2 1 0 0

30 734.98 1,793 3 2 0 0

TOTALS 129 73 0 0

ACRE-FEET 129 145 0 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 0

Spill 0

Total 0

Historical Archive and Report Database

Spring Creek Debris Reservoir Daily 

Operations

Run Date: 10/10/2023
#### § 669.650 How are MSFW youth funds allocated to section 167 youth grantees?

The allocation of funds among entities designated as WIA section 167 MSFW Youth Program grantees is based on the comparative merits of the applications, in accordance with criteria set forth in the SGA. However, we may include criteria in the SGA that promote a geographical distribution of funds and that encourages both large- and small-scale programs.
### §5203. Enforcement

#### (a) Attorney General

The Attorney General shall take the necessary steps and institute the necessary legal action to effectuate the policies and provisions of this chapter.

#### (b) Relief

Any district court of the United States for a district in which a violation of this chapter occurs shall have authority, upon petition of relief by the Attorney General, to grant injunctive and such other equitable relief as it shall deem necessary to enforce the provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 100–204, title X, §1004, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1407.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000

<CASH>                                         345,136
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,519,869
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,628,149
<INVENTORY>                                    623,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,531,020
<PP&E>                                         4,198,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,311,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 18,262,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,508,369
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      482,526
<OTHER-SE>                                     (143,473)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,923,909
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              9,441,662
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,250,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               389,696
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              371,750
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             361,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                68,051
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   68,051
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .01



</TABLE>
#### § 10000.1 Purpose.

This part describes the general organization of the agency and the major functions of the operating units established within it.
§ 725.607 Payments of additional compensation. ( a ) If any benefits payable under the terms of an award by a district director (§ 725.419(d)), a decision and order filed and served by an administrative law judge (§ 725.478), or a decision filed by the Board or a U.S. court of appeals, are not paid by an operator or other employer ordered to make such payments within 10 days after such payments become due, there will be added to such unpaid benefits an amount equal to 20 percent thereof, which must be paid to the claimant at the same time as, but in addition to, such benefits, unless review of the order making such award is sought as provided in section 21 of the LHWCA and an order staying payments has been issued.
( b ) If, on account of an operator's or other employer's failure to pay benefits as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, benefit payments are made by the fund, the eligible claimant will nevertheless be entitled to receive such additional compensation to which he or she may be eligible under paragraph (a), with respect to all amounts paid by the fund on behalf of such operator or other employer.
( c ) The fund may not be held liable for payments of additional compensation under any circumstances.
[81 FR 24482, Apr. 26, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-19-1998
<CASH>                                       1,740,000
<SECURITIES>                                11,095,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,255,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,309,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,717,000
<PP&E>                                      10,366,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,972,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,081,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,911,000
<BONDS>                                      1,607,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,422,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,081,000
<SALES>                                      4,446,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,696,000
<CGS>                                        3,507,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,515,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,437,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (172,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (84,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (90,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (90,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 418.2225 Which more recent tax year will we use?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1225, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
#### Thomas J. COX, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Respondent.

No. 05-3171.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 9, 2006.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

This CAUSE having been heard and considered it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
#### Fiscal Court of Bell County v. Howard (four cases).

May 18, 1943.

Martin R. Wilson and 'Cleon K. Calvert for appellant.

E. B. Wilson for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Pulton

Reversing.

The appellee, John J. Howard, was clerk of the Bell County Court for the four-year term beginning January *1,*1937. He presented four claims to the fiscal court for making lists of registered voters for the use of election •officers at various elections held during his term. The lists were made pursuant to section 1486bb-7 of the Kentucky Statutes (now KRS 117.110). Each claim embraced a charge of two cents for each five names listed ■on the original, duplicate and triplicate lists. The fiscal court, being of the opinion that the compensation provided by section 1486bb-22 of the Kentucky Statutes (now KRS 117.140) was limited to two cents for each five names on the original list, allowed his claim accordingly.

Appellee filed four separate appeals to the circuit •court from the respective orders of the fiscal court allowing one-third of each of his claims and disallowing the remaining two-thirds. The circuit court rendered .judgment for the full amount of the claims. One claim was for more than $500 and from the judgment on this •claim an appeal was granted to this court. Each of the other three claims was for more than $200 and less than *351$500 and motions for appeals have been made in each of those cases. The four cases were ordered to be heard together and are disposed of in this opinion.

There is considerable argument in the briefs on the question whether the fiscal court was before the circuit court on the appeals (the appearance of the fiscal court was entered by the county attorney), but, since the judgments must be reversed, it is unnecessary to decide the question.

In Smothers v. Washington County Fiscal Court, 294 Ky. 35, 170 S. W. (2d) 867, the identical question here involved was before us and we held that the county clerk is entitled to be paid only two cents for each five names on the original list of registered voters and no more. That case is conclusive of the question before us.

The motions for appeals in cases Nos. 20,861, 20,865 and 20,867 are sustained and the appeals are granted. The judgments in the four eases are reversed with directions to enter judgments in conformity with this opinion.
### §8604. Reports required

#### (a) Report on Israel's qualitative military edge (QME)

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after July 27, 2012, the President shall submit to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on the status of Israel's qualitative military edge in light of current trends and instability in the region.

#### (2) Substitution for quadrennial report

If submitted within one year of the date that the first quadrennial report required by section 201(c)(2) of the Naval Vessel Transfer Act of 2008 (Public Law 110–429; 22 U.S.C. 2776 note) is due to be submitted, the report required by paragraph (1) may substitute for such quadrennial report.

#### (b) Reports on other matters

Not later than 180 days after July 27, 2012, the President shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on each of the following matters:

(1) Taking into account the Government of Israel's urgent requirement for F–35 aircraft, actions to improve the process relating to its purchase of F–35 aircraft, particularly with respect to cost efficiency and timely delivery.

(2) Efforts to expand cooperation between the United States and Israel in homeland security, counter-terrorism, maritime security, energy, cyber-security, and other related areas.

(3) Actions to integrate Israel into the defense of the Eastern Mediterranean.

(Pub. L. 112–150, §6, July 27, 2012, 126 Stat. 1148.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Certain Functions Under Section 6 of Public Law 112–150

Memorandum of President of the United States, Jan. 15, 2013, 78 F.R. 5705, provided that:

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to you all functions conferred upon the President by subsections (a) and (b) of section 6 of Public Law 112–150. You will exercise these functions in coordination with the Secretary of Defense.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

Barack Obama.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21407]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than October 18, 2004.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Lindoe, Inc., Ordway, Colorado; to acquire up to 14.99 percent 
of the voting shares of Southern Colorado National Bancorp, Inc., and 
thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Southern Colorado National 
Bank, both of Pueblo, Colorado.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, September 20, 
2004.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 04-21407 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S