alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31

CERTIFICATION



I, Denise D. Smith, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: April 11, 2007



/s/  Denise D. Smith

Denise D. Smith

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
§ 411.515 Can the EN change its elected payment system? ( a ) Yes. Any change by an EN in its elected EN payment system will apply to beneficiaries who assign their ticket to the EN after the EN's change in election becomes effective. A change in the EN's election will become effective with the first day of the month following the month in which the EN notifies us of the change. For beneficiaries who already assigned their ticket to the EN under the EN's earlier elected payment system, the EN's earlier elected payment system will continue to apply. These rules also apply to a change by a State VR agency in its elected EN payment system for cases in which the State VR agency serves a beneficiary as an EN.
( b ) After an EN (or a State VR agency) first elects an EN payment system, the EN (or State VR agency) can choose to make one change in its elected payment system in each calendar year (January-December) thereafter. The first EN payment system election constitutes the only election an EN may make for that calendar year.
[66 FR 67420, Dec. 28, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 29346, May 20, 2008]
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25145]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA37


Marine Mammals; File No. 978-1857

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that Paul E. Nachtigall, Ph.D., Marine 
Mammal Research Program, Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology, P.O. Box 
1106, Kailua, Hawaii 96734 has been issued a minor amendment to 
Scientific Research Permit No. 978-1857.

ADDRESSES: These documents are also available upon written request or 
by appointment in the following offices:

Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 
1315 East-West Highway, Room 13705, Silver Spring, MD 20910; phone 
(301) 427-8401; fax (301) 713-0376; and
Pacific Islands Region, NMFS, 1601 Kapiolani Blvd., Room 1110, 
Honolulu, HI 96814-4700; phone (808) 944-2200; fax (808) 973-2941.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Skidmore or Amy Sloan, (301) 
427-8401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The requested amendment has been granted 
under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the regulations governing the 
taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
    The original permit, issued on May 17, 2007 (72 FR 29127) 
authorizes the permit holder to conduct acoustic studies on captive 
marine mammals at the Hawaii Institute of Marine Biology through May 
31, 2012. The minor amendment (No. 978-1857-01) extends the duration of 
the permit through May 31, 2013, but does not: Change the manner in 
which animals may be taken, increase the number of animals authorized 
to be taken, or add new species or geographic locations.

    Dated: April 23, 2012.
Tammy C. Adams,
Acting Chief, Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected 
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-10227 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

November-09

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG. Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 3,354 3,792 72-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 905 3,463 43-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 868 3,463 44-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 879 3,484 45-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 844 3,479 46-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 00 3,469 37-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 885 3,464 48-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 875 3,455 49-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 882 3,446 4

10-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 880 3,443 411-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 880 3,443 412-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 882 3,441 413-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,072 3,447 414-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,081 3,445 415-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,004 3,444 4

16-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,210 3,046 4

17-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,083 2,884 3

18-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,081 2,887 3

19-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,083 2,242 3

20-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,078 1,988 3

21-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,083 1,986 3

22-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,079 1,982 3

23-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,043 1,976 3

24-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 1,913 1,973 3

25-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 3,405 1,969 5

26-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 3,386 1,971 5

27-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 2,920 1,978 4

28-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 2,883 1,987 4

29-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 3,492 1,978 5

30-Nov-09 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 3,138 1,977 5

Total 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 45,172 85,004 130

Banks Tracy Comb
#### Sharon S. COX, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, Respondent.

No. 05-3072.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2006.

Before MAYER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM:

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
PAYNE FALKNER SMITH & JONES, P. C.
                       Certified Public Accountants





Report of Independent Auditors on Compliance with Requirements of the Uniform
                Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers


Board of Directors and Stockholder
of Colonial Savings, F.A.

We have examined management's assertion about Colonial Savings, F.A.
("Colonial") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as of and for the year ended September
30, 2005, included in the accompanying management's assertion about
Colonial's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about Colonial's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not
provide a legal determination on Colonial's compliance with the minimum
servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Colonial complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
September 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Payne Falkner Smith & Jones, P.C.
Payne Falkner Smith & Jones, P.C.

November 28, 2005
















COLONIAL SAVINGS

           Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance with
                   USAP Minimum Servicing Standards


November 28, 2005


As of and for the year ended September 30, 2005, Colonial Savings, F.A. has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set
forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of .America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers.

As of and for this same period, Colonial Savings, F.A. had in effect a
fidelity-bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $11,000,000.



/s/ Jim E. DuBose
Jim E. DuBose
President, Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Ben Dempsey
Ben Dempsey
Executive Vice President

       2626A WEST FREEWAY, FORT WORTH, TEXAS 76102 OFFICE: 817-390-0000
                           www.colonialsavings.com
#### § 726.6 The Office of Workers' Compensation Programs.

The Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (hereinafter the Office or OWCP) is that division of the U.S. Department of Labor which has been empowered by the Secretary of Labor to carry out his or her functions under section 415 and part C of title IV of the Act. As noted throughout this part 726 the Office shall perform a number of functions with respect to the regulation of both the self-insurance and commercial insurance programs. All correspondence with or submissions to the Office should be addressed as follows: Division of Coal Mine Workers' Compensation, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210.

[77 FR 37286, June 21, 2012]
§ 684.910 What information is required in a waiver request? ( a ) To request a waiver, an INA program grantee must submit a waiver request indicating how the waiver will improve the grantee's WIOA program activities. The waiver process will be generally consistent with, but not identical to, the waiver requirements under sec. 189(i)(3)(B) of WIOA. INA program grantees may submit a waiver request as part of the 4-year strategic plan.
( b ) A waiver may be requested at the beginning of a 4-year grant award cycle or anytime during a 4-year award cycle. However, all waivers expire at the end of the 4-year award cycle. INA program grantees seeking to continue an existing waiver in a new 4-year grant cycle must submit a new waiver request in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTensile Properties and Microstructural Characterization of Hi-Nicalon SiC/RBSN CompositesThe room temperature physical and mechanical properties of silicon carbide fiber-reinforced reaction-bonded silicon nitride matrix composites (SiC/RBSN) were measured, and the composite microstructure was analyzed. The composites consist of nearly 24 vol% of aligned Hi-Nicalon SiC fiber yarns in a approx. 30 vol% porous silicon nitride matrix. The fiber yarns were coated by chemical vapor deposition with a 0.8 mm layer of boron nitride (BN) followed by a 0.2 mm layer of SiC. In the as-fabricated condition, both 1-D and 2-D composites exhibited high strength and graceful failure, and showed improved properties w en compared with unreinforced matrix of comparable density. No indication of reaction between the SiC fiber and BN coating was noticed, but the outer SiC layer reacted locally with the nitridation enhancing additive in the RBSN matrix. A comparison is made between the predicted and measured values of matrix cracking strength.Document ID19980236874Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsBhatt, Ramakrishna T.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1998Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208657E-11379NAS 1.15:208657ARL-TR-1791Meeting InformationMeeting: CIMTEC ''98: Modern Materials and TechnologiesLocation: FlorenceCountry: ItalyStart Date: June 14, 1998End Date: June 19, 1998Sponsors:Gruppo Colorobbia,Commission of the European CommunitiesFunding Number(s)PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-62211-A4-7APROJECT: RTOP 505-63-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980236874.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the quarterly report of NVCN Corporation. ("Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 17, 2008                 By: /s/ Gary Borglund
                                          -----------------
                                      Gary Borglund, Principal Executive Officer
                                      and Principal Financial Officer

                                       17
§ 684.740 Under what circumstances can the Department or the Indian and Native American grantee modify the terms of the grantee's plan(s)? ( a ) The Department may unilaterally modify the INA program grantee's plan to add funds or, if required by Congressional action, to reduce the amount of funds available for expenditure.
( b ) The INA program grantee may request approval to modify its plan to add, expand, delete, or diminish any service allowable under the regulations in this part. The INA program grantee may modify its plan without our approval, unless the modification reduces the total number of participants to be served annually under the grantee's program by a number which exceeds 25 percent of the participants previously proposed to be served, or by 25 participants, whichever is larger.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000737210
<NAME> LNB BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          21,721
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,793
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     76,519
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          45,745
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            44,922
<LOANS>                                        395,237
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (3,483)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 560,613
<DEPOSITS>                                     452,846
<SHORT-TERM>                                    29,567
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,646
<LONG-TERM>                                     22,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,223
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 560,613
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,980
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,785
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    13
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,778
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,048           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,575
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,203
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,745
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,833
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.89
<LOANS-NON>                                        848
<LOANS-PAST>                                       479
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 2,922
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  7,459
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,483
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      270
<RECOVERIES>                                        70
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,483
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,549
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            934
                             

</TABLE>
§ 688.570 Does the Department allow incentive payments in the YouthBuild program? ( a ) Grantees are permitted to provide incentive payments to youth participants for recognition and achievement directly tied to training activities and work experiences. Grantees must tie the incentive payments to the goals of the specific grant program and outline such goals in writing prior to starting the program that makes incentive payments.
( b ) Prior to providing incentive payments, the organization must have written policies and procedures in place governing the awarding of incentives, and the incentives provided under the grant must align with these organizational policies.
( c ) All incentive payments must comply with the requirements in Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200.
§ 625.13 Restrictions on entitlement; disqualification. ( a ) *Income reductions.* The amount of DUA payable to an individual for a week of unemployment, as computed pursuant to § 625.6, shall be reduced by the amount of any of the following that an individual has received for the week or would receive for the week if the individual filed a claim or application therefor and took all procedural steps necessary under the appropriate law, contract, or policy to receive such payment: ( 1 ) Any benefits or insurance proceed from any source not defined as “compensation” under § 625.2(d) for loss of wages due to illness or disability;
( 2 ) A supplemental unemployment benefit pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement.
( 3 ) Private income protection insurance;
( 4 ) Any workers' compensation by virtue of the death of the head of the household as the result of the major disaster in the major disaster area, prorated by weeks, if the individual has become the head of the household and is seeking suitable work because the head of the household died as the result of the major disaster in the major disaster area; and
( 5 ) The prorated amount of a retirement pension or annuity under a public or private retirement plan or system, prorated, where necessary, by weeks, but only if, and to the extent that, such amount would be deducted from regular compensation payable under the applicable State law.
( 6 ) The prorated amount of primary benefits under title II of the Social Security Act, but only to the extent that such benefits would be deduced from regular compensation if payable to the individual under the applicable State law.
( b ) *Disqualification.* ( 1 ) An individual shall not be entitled to DUA for any week after the week in which the individual is reemployed in a suitable position.
( 2 ) An individual who refuses without good cause to accept a bona fide offer of reemployment in a position suitable to the individual, or to investigate or accept a referral to a position which is suitable to and available to the individual, shall not be entitled to DUA with respect to the week in which such refusal occurs or in any subsequent week in the Disaster Assistance Period. For the purposes of this paragraph, a position shall not be deemed to be suitable for an individual if the circumstances present any unusual risk to the health, safety, or morals of the individual, if it is impracticable for the individual to accept the position, or if acceptance for the position would, as to the individual, be inconsistent with any labor standard in section 3304(a)(5) of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 26 U.S.C. 3304(a)(5), or the comparable provisions of the applicable State law.
[42 FR 46712, Sept. 16, 1977, as amended at 55 FR 556, Jan. 5, 1990]