alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 726.315 Contents. Any petition or cross-petition for review shall: ( a ) Be dated;
( b ) Be typewritten or legibly written;
( c ) State the specific reason or reasons why the party petitioning for review believes the Administrative Law Judge's decision is in error;
( d ) Be signed by the party filing the petition or an authorized representative of such party; and
( e ) Attach copies of the Administrative Law Judge's decision and any other documents admitted into the record by the Administrative Law Judge which would assist the Secretary in determining whether review is warranted.
#### § 702.251 Employer's controversion of the right to compensation.

Where the employer controverts the right to compensation after notice or knowledge of the injury or death, or after receipt of a written claim, he must give notice thereof, stating the reasons for controverting the right to compensation, using the form prescribed by the Director. Such notice, or answer to the claim, must be filed with the district director within 14 days from the date the employer receives notice or has knowledge of the injury or death. A copy of the notice must also be given to the claimant.

[80 FR 12929, Mar. 12, 2015]
#### § 664.510 Are Individual Training Accounts allowed for youth participants?

No, however, individuals age 18 and above, who are eligible for training services under the adult and dislocated worker programs, may receive Individual Training Accounts through those programs. Requirements for concurrent participation requirements are set forth in § 664.500. To the extent possible, in order to enhance youth participant choice, youth participants should be involved in the selection of educational and training activities.
### §286p. Issuance, purpose, and redemption of Special Drawing Rights certificates

(a) The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to issue to the Federal Reserve banks, and such banks shall purchase, Special Drawing Right certificates in such form and in such denominations as he may determine, against any Special Drawing Rights held to the credit of the Exchange Stabilization Fund. Such certificates shall be issued and remain outstanding only for the purpose of financing the acquisition of Special Drawing Rights or for financing exchange stabilization operations. The amount of Special Drawing Right certificates issued and outstanding shall at no time exceed the value of the Special Drawing Rights held against the Special Drawing Right certificates. The proceeds resulting from the issuance of Special Drawing Right certificates shall be covered into the Exchange Stabilization Fund.

(b) Special Drawing Right certificates owned by the Federal Reserve banks shall be redeemed from the resources of the Exchange Stabilization Fund at such times and in such amounts as the Secretary of the Treasury may determine.

(Pub. L. 90–349, §4, June 19, 1968, 82 Stat. 188.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act July 31, 1945, ch. 339, 59 Stat. 512, known as the Bretton Woods Agreement Act, which comprises this subchapter.
#### President and Directors of Manhattan Company, Respondent, v. Louis Friedman Realty Co., Inc., et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present ■—Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
### §7811. Sense of Congress regarding negotiations with North Korea

It is the sense of Congress that the human rights of North Koreans should remain a key element in future negotiations between the United States, North Korea, and other concerned parties in Northeast Asia.

(Pub. L. 108–333, title I, §101, Oct. 18, 2004, 118 Stat. 1290.)
#### § 652.203 Who is responsible for funds authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act in the workforce development system?

The SWA retains responsibility for all funds authorized under the Wagner-Peyser Act, including those funds authorized under sec. 7(a) required for providing the services and activities delivered as part of the one-stop delivery system.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.02

 129.95

 129.96

 130.29

 130.93

 130.49

 130.15

 130.18

 130.42

 130.36

 130.27

 130.51

 130.55

 130.49

 130.45

 130.38

 130.35

 130.43

 130.58

 130.47

 130.37

 130.23

 129.82

 129.88

 129.75

 128.97

 128.97

 129.56

 129.89

 130.01

 583

 576

 577

 611

 682

 632

 596

 599

 625

 619

 609

 634

 639

 632

 628

 621

 618

 626

 642

 630

 620

 604

 562

 568

 556

 482

 482

 537

 569

 582

STORAGE

-29

-7

+1

+34

+71

-50

-36

+3

+26

-6

-10

+25

+5

-7

-4

-7

-3

+8

+16

-12

-10

-16

-42

+6

-12

-74

+0

+55

+32

+13

CHANGE

85

88

89

90

80

62

69

89

86

69

63

59

30

39

67

66

68

67

62

51

55

52

69

120

109

78

115

117

71

58

INFLOW

 30

 29

 28

 28

 28

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 26

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 55

 85

 85

 85

 85

 59

 25

 28

PUTAH

 70

 63

 60

 45

 16

 60

 60

 60

 46

 45

 41

 19

 0

 17

 44

 45

 45

 38

 29

 32

 35

 35

 35

 32

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 23

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .04

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .09

 .07

 .09

 .14

 .13

 .09

 .09

 .07

 .00

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .05

 .09

 .14

 .09

 .07

 .08

 .06

 .00

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .63

 .21

 1.30

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .32

 .00

 1.46

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.31

 .02

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2001 RUN DATE: 12/20/2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -30 2,223 1,145 1,092 0 1.95 5.32

ACRE-FEET -30 4,409 2,271 2,166 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,166

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,271

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.32

JULY 1, 2001 6.26

 612

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §9804. Selection of priority countries and regions

#### (a) In general

The President, in coordination with the Secretary of State, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, and the Secretary of Defense, and in consultation with the appropriate congressional committees specified in subsection (b), shall select certain countries as "priority countries" and certain regions as "priority regions" for the purpose of implementing the Global Fragility Strategy required under section 9803 of this title—

(1) on the basis of—

(A) the national security interests of the United States;

(B) clearly defined indicators of the levels of violence or fragility in such country or region, such as the country's or region's—

(i) ranking on recognized global fragility lists, such as the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development States of Fragility report, the Fund for Peace Fragile States Index, the World Bank Harmonized List of Fragile Situations, the Institute for Economics and Peace Global Peace Index, and the Holocaust Museum Early Warning Project Risk Assessment;

(ii) ranking on select United States Government conflict and atrocity early warning watch lists;

(iii) levels of violence, including violence committed by armed groups, state actors, and violent extremist organizations, gender-based violence, and violence against children and youth; and

(iv) vulnerability to rising sea levels, flooding, drought, wildfires, desertification, deforestation, food insecurity, and human displacement; and

(C) an assessment of—

(i) the commitment and capacity of national and sub-national government entities and civil society partners in such country or region to work with relevant Federal departments and agencies on the Global Fragility Strategy, including by demonstrating commitment to—

(I) improving inclusive, transparent, and accountable power structures, including effective, legitimate, and resilient national and sub-national institutions; and

(II) ensuring strong foundations for human rights, rule of law, and equal access to justice; and

(ii) the likelihood that United States assistance under the Global Fragility Strategy would measurably help to reduce fragility, prevent the spread of extremism and violence, and stabilize conflict-affected areas in each such country or region; and

(2) in a manner that ensures that not fewer than five countries or regions are selected, including not fewer than two in which the priority will be preventing violent conflict and fragility, rather than stabilizing ongoing conflicts.

#### (b) Consultation with Congress

Prior to finalization of the selection of priority countries and regions under subsection (a), representatives from the Department of State, USAID, the Department of Defense, and other relevant Federal departments and agencies, as necessary and appropriate, shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on the countries and regions being considered and shall consider congressional input on such prioritization.

(Pub. L. 116–94, div. J, title V, §505, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3063.)
EXHIBIT
13.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Rob Sandhu, Director, Chairman, President, Chief Executive and
Operating Officer and Secretary of Giant Oil & Gas Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and  results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
May 21, 2008











By:
            /s/ Rob SandhuName:
            Rob
      SandhuTitle:
            Director,
      Chairman, President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer and
      Secretary








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. PRAY, Appellant.

(241 N. W. 745.)

(File No. 7253.

Opinion filed March 29, 1932.)

*628
      *M. M. McKee,'oí*Rapid 'City, for Appellant.

*Turner M. Rudesill,*of Rapid City, *M. Q. Sharpe,*Attorney Gem al, and *Frank W. Mitchell,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered upon a verdict finding him guilty of grand larceny, and purports to appeal also from a denial of his motion for new trial.

Application for new trial upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence must be made either upon settled record or the minutes of the court. Section 2556, Rev. Code 1919. In the instant case motion for new trial was made on January 5 and denied on January 24, but specifications of error as to the insufficiency of the evidence were not filed or served until April 30, and the record was not settled uptil May 16. There was nothing upon which the trial court could act at the time the motion .for new trial was made, so far as concerns any question of the sufficiency f the evidence. The matter stands, therefore, as though no motion or new trial had been made, and the sufficiency of the evidence is ot subject to review 'by this court.

Certain errors in excluding testimony are urged, and, .nasmuch as a settled record is in fact before this court, the pro*629priety of such ruling is probably for consideration upon appeal from the judgment only. Fuller v. Harms Supply Co., 54 S. D. 492, 223 N. W. 713. It appears from the record, however that the same witness was subsequently permitted to answer in effect the questions which appellant claims it was error to refuse to permit him to answer. It follows, therefore, that the error, if any, was without prejudice. Territory v. Collins, 6 Dak. 234, 50 N. W. 122.

The sufficiency of the evidence not being reviewable upon this record, and the other assignments showing no prejudicial error, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

CAMPBELL, P. J., and POLLEY, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. POND, et al, Appellants.

(240 N. W. 486.)

(File No. 7056.

Opinion filed January 30, 1932.)

/. *L. Meighen*and *Ernest A. Crockett,*both of Yankton, for Appellants.

*M. Q. Sharpe,*Attorney General, *Erank W. Mitchell,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Lee H. Cope,*State’s Attorney, of Yankton, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The brief of appellants filed herein exhibits a complete disregard of the rules of this court, and is insufficient to present any question whatever for our consideration.

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

All the Judges concur, excepting ROBERTS, J., disqualified and not sitting.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.85

 130.81

 130.83

 130.83

 130.87

 130.89

 130.80

 130.83

 130.79

 130.70

 130.78

 130.77

 130.78

 130.70

 130.83

 130.66

 130.79

 130.86

 130.80

 130.72

 130.73

 130.83

 130.74

 130.80

 130.90

 130.72

 130.51

 130.64

 130.67

 130.64

 130.55

 673

 668

 670

 670

 675

 677

 667

 670

 666

 656

 665

 664

 665

 656

 670

 651

 666

 674

 667

 658

 659

 670

 660

 667

 678

 658

 634

 649

 652

 649

 639

STORAGE

-1

-5

+2

+0

+5

+2

-10

+3

-4

-10

+9

-1

+1

-9

+14

-19

+15

+8

-7

-9

+1

+11

-10

+7

+11

-20

-24

+15

+3

-3

-10

CHANGE

656

657

646

628

615

635

653

662

690

681

651

640

640

652

644

600

595

586

606

618

646

665

680

671

640

631

656

648

635

616

595

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 613

 616

 601

 584

 568

 590

 614

 616

 648

 642

 602

 597

 595

 613

 593

 566

 542

 537

 565

 578

 601

 615

 641

 623

 590

 597

 624

 596

 589

 574

 556

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .34

 .30

 .37

 .30

 .35

 .38

 .42

 .35

 .38

 .27

 .30

 .36

 .40

 .38

 .38

 .38

 .45

 .45

 .46

 .44

 .39

 .33

 .35

 .35

 .34

 .35

 .41

 .36

 .36

 .31

 .31

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 RUN DATE: 08/23/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -35 19,838 18,486 1,333 35 11.32 .00

ACRE-FEET -35 39,349 36,667 2,644 69

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,644

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 36,667

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2004 .00

 674

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §§2141a to 2141d. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–288, §7(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3407

Section 2141a, Pub. L. 104–288, §3, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3403, related to establishment of United States National Tourism Organization.

Section 2141b, Pub. L. 104–288, §4, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3404, related to establishment of United States National Tourism Organization Board.

Section 2141c, Pub. L. 104–288, §5, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3406, related to design and use by Organization of symbols, emblems, trademarks, and names.

Section 2141d, Pub. L. 104–288, §6, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3406; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIII, §1335(o), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–789, related to United States Government cooperation.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective 2 years after Oct. 11, 1996, see section 7 of Pub. L. 104–288, as described in the Codification note under former section 2141e of this title.
§ 802.104 Consolidation; severance. ( a ) Cases may, in the sole discretion of the Board, be consolidated for purposes of an appeal upon the motion of any party or upon the Board's own motion where there exist common parties, common questions of law or fact or both, or in such other circumstances as justice and the administration of the Acts require.
( b ) Upon its own motion, or upon motion of any party, the Board may, for good cause, order any proceeding severed with respect to some or all issues or parties.
<PAGE>

                            LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                         Exhibit to Form 10 - Q

              (For the nine months ended September 30, 2003)

                        Exhibit Number (32.(b))

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gregory D. Friedman, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gregory D. Friedman


Gregory D. Friedman, CPA
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary
November 14, 2003
### §3509. Conflict of interest; personnel and activities covered

Members of the Council and Institute Fellows shall avoid any action, in their activities with respect to the Institute, which might result in, or create the appearance of, a conflict of interest, including but not limited to—

(1) using their office or position for private gain;

(2) giving preferential treatment to any person;

(3) making recommendations or decisions relating to any activity authorized by this chapter in other than an impartial and independent manner;

(4) misusing Government property or official information obtained through their office or position which has not been made available to the general public; or

(5) affecting adversely the confidence of the public in the integrity of the Institute.

(Pub. L. 96–53, title IV, §409, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 376.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in par. (3), was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 96–53, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 371, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 512(a) of Pub. L. 96–53, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
### §501. Utilization of services of Government agencies to promote inter-American relations

In order to render closer and more effective the relationship between the American republics the President of the United States is authorized, subject to such appropriations as are made available for the purpose, to utilize the services of the departments, agencies, and independent establishments of the Government in carrying out the reciprocal undertakings and cooperative purposes enunciated in the treaties, resolutions, declarations, and recommendations signed by all of the twenty-one American republics at the Inter-American Conference for the Maintenance of Peace held at Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1936, and at the Eighth International Conference of American States held at Lima, Peru, in 1938.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 616, §1, 53 Stat. 1290.)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
**1129 KA 11-01031**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JASON LAWSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

LINDA M. CAMPBELL, SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (VICTORIA M. WHITE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Jeffrey R. Merrill, A.J.), rendered October 5, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Same Memorandum as in People v Lawson ([appeal No. 7] ___ AD3d ___ [Jan. 2, 2015]).

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.1


                           ANNUAL COMPLIANCE REPORT

I, Janet P. O'Hara, being an officer of U.S. Bank Trust National Association,
the Trustee in respect of the STRATS(SM) Trust For Goldman Sachs Capital I
Securities, Series 2005-1 (the "Trust"), certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K in respect of the
            Trust, and all reports on Form 8-K filed by the Trustee in respect
            of the Trust and all distribution or servicing reports filed in
            respect of the Trust during the 2006 calendar year;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as
            a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
            or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
            made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
            were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered
            by this annual report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be
            provided to the certificateholders by the Trustee under the trust
            agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in these
            reports;

      4.    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
            Trustee, under the trust agreement and based on my knowledge,
            except as disclosed in this annual report, the Trustee has
            fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

      5.    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
            Trustee's compliance with the minimum servicing or similar
            standards based upon the report provided by an independent public
            accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
            Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
            procedure, as set forth in the trust agreement, that is included
            in these reports.

Date: March 30, 2007

By:    /s/ Janet P. O'Hara
     ------------------------------------
Janet P. O'Hara, Assistant Vice President