alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

214 

KA 11-02372 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JEROME A. THAGARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL J. HILLERY

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Richard

C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.), rendered April 12, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of murder in the second degree and

criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed.

Memorandum: We are advised that, by order dated December 9,

2013, Supreme Court granted defendant’s motion to vacate the judgment

of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10. Thus, defendant’s direct appeal

from the judgment of conviction must be dismissed as moot (see People

v Mills, 5 AD3d 1051, 1051; see also People v James, 212 AD2d 822,

822; People v Pimental, 189 AD2d 788, 788).

Entered: March 28, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

WARWICK TOWNSHIP,

Respondent

v.

JAIME WINTERS AND JASON WINTERS,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 567 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of January, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4523 

To repeal the Military Selective Service Act, and thereby terminate the registration requirements of such Act and eliminate civilian local boards, 

civilian appeal boards, and similar local agencies of the Selective Service 

System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2016 

Mr. COFFMAN (for himself, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. POLIS, and Mr. ROHRABACHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the Military Selective Service Act, and thereby 

terminate the registration requirements of such Act and 

eliminate civilian local boards, civilian appeal boards, and 

similar local agencies of the Selective Service System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF MILITARY SELECTIVE SERVICE 

4 ACT. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—The Military Selective Service Act (50 

6 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.) is repealed. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4523 IH

1 (b) TRANSFERS IN CONNECTION WITH REPEAL.— 

2 Notwithstanding the proviso in section 10(a)(4) of the 

3 Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 3809(a)(4)), the 

4 Office of Selective Service Records shall not be reestab5 lished upon the repeal of the Act. Not later than 180 days 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the assets, 

7 contracts, property, and records held by the Selective 

8 Service System, and the unexpended balances of any ap9 propriations available to the Selective Service System, 

10 shall be transferred to the Administrator of General Serv11 ices upon the repeal of the Act. The Director of the Office 

12 of Personnel Management shall assist officers and employ13 ees of the Selective Service System to transfer to other 

14 positions in the executive branch. 

15 (c) EFFECT ON EXISTING SANCTIONS.—Notwith16 standing any other provision of law, a person may not be 

17 denied a right, privilege, benefit, or employment position 

18 under Federal law on the grounds that the person failed 

19 to present himself for and submit to registration under 

20 section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 

21 3802), before the repeal of that Act by subsection (a). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10395]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DOD-2010-HA-0132]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by May 31, 
2012.
    Title and OMB Number: TRICARE Retiree Dental Program Enrollment 
Application; OMB Control Number 0720-0015.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement.
    Number of Respondents: 64,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 64,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 16,000.
    Needs and Uses: The information is necessary to enable the DoD-
contracted third party administrator of the program to identify the 
program's applicants, determine their eligibility for TRICARE Retiree 
Dental Program enrollment, establish the premium payment amount, and to 
verify by the applicant's signature that the applicant understands the 
benefits and rules of the program. The information is provided by 
Uniformed Services members entitled to retired pay and their eligible 
family members who are seeking enrollment in the TRICARE Retiree Dental 
Program.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Mr. Kraemer at the Office of Management 
and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 4800 Mark Center Drive, East Tower, Suite 02G09, Alexandria, 
VA 22350-3100.

    Dated: February 15, 2012.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2012-10395 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bruce R. York, Chief Financial Officer of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. (Nastech), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Nastech on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nastech.

Date: May 8, 2008



|    |  |                               
|--- |  | ------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Bruce R. York             
|    |  | Name: Bruce R. York           
|    |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Nastech and will be
retained by Nastech and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Nastech for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 795.91

 793.72

 790.67

 788.05

 785.15

 782.22

 780.48

 779.08

 777.23

 776.28

 775.61

 781.06

 784.21

 782.24

 779.40

 776.77

 773.63

 770.05

 766.07

 761.74

 756.89

 751.51

 745.86

 739.36

 731.88

 723.12

 713.66

 709.53

 708.23

 711.53

 713.88

 5,957

 5,758

 5,487

 5,260

 5,016

 4,777

 4,637

 4,526

 4,384

 4,311

 4,260

 4,683

 4,938

 4,778

 4,552

 4,349

 4,113

 3,853

 3,576

 3,287

 2,978

 2,653

 2,332

 1,999

 1,656

 1,301

 972

 848

 811

 907

 979

STORAGE

-123

-199

-271

-227

-244

-239

-140

-111

-142

-73

-51

+423

+255

-160

-226

-203

-236

-260

-277

-289

-309

-325

-321

-333

-343

-355

-329

-124

-37

+96

+72

CHANGE

166

94

63

51

42

45

36

31

28

63

74

313

284

169

114

73

56

44

35

29

26

36

38

32

27

21

-2

2

16

48

36

INFLOW

 189

 20

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 39

 174

 200

 165

 165

 165

 107

 87

 100

 100

 100

 100

 155

 250

 228

 175

 175

 175

 175

 175

 182

 200

 200

 200

 200

 200

 164

 65

 35

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 25, 2003

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -5,101 2,090 209 4,456

ACRE-FEET -5,101 4,146 415 8,838

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 415

OUTLET

TOTAL

 8,838

 9,253

 6,080

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
#### Isidore Shlemansky et al., Respondents, v. Henry Lapidus et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Henry’s Luncheonette, Defendants, and Leon Lapidus, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Yoorhis, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Nathan A. McDonald, the Principal Accounting Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Report on Form 10-KSB of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation.

Date:    April 11, 2008.

| | /s/ "Nathan McDonald"                       
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Nathan McDonald
Principal Accounting Officer

__________
EXHIBIT 99.1



                                                                      [LOGO UPC]




Please find below UPC's reaction to the press release issued by UGC yesterday
("UGC and Bondholder Committee Reach Agreement in Principle on Recapitalisation
of United Pan-Europe Communications").





STATEMENT

Amsterdam, July 25, 2002 -- "This announcement by UGC is an important and
welcome next step in the recapitalisation of UPC's balance sheet. Although UPC
is not a party to the arrangement, it is looking forward to participating in the
negotiations for a definitive agreement. This will be subject to approval in
accordance with usual corporate governance rules, including board approvals. It
is expected that this recapitalisation will lead to a substantial dilution of
the existing UPC ordinary A shareholders."











For further information, please contact:

Claire Appleby                      Bert Holtkamp
Director of Investor Relations      Director of Corporate Communications
+ 44 (0) 207 647 8233               + 31 (0) 20 778 9447 or + 31 (0) 655 38 0594
Email: ir@upccorp.com               Email: corpcomms@upccorp.com

Lazard                              Citigate First Financial
Richard Stables                     Carina Hamaker
+ 44 (0) 20 7588 2721               + 31 (0) 20 575 40 10

Jim Millstein                       Citigate Dewe Rogerson
+ 1 212 632 6000                    Toby Moore
                                    + 44 (0) 20 7638 9571
JP Morgan Chase
Doug McRae
+ 1 415 371 4352

Andrea Salvato
+ 44 (0) 20 7325 6460


Also, please visit www.upccorp.com for further information about UPC.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          364000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 10119100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2014200
<INVENTORY>                                      60400
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              10014500
<PP&E>                                        12154300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7132500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                19669600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8294600
<BONDS>                                        1583700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         82700
<OTHER-SE>                                     6084800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  19669600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              19812700
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 19462200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              139500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 211000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     89400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             121600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    121600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Kenney, James (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 3:11 PM

To: dursitti@buildimagery.com

Cc: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Subject: RE: Section 333 Exemption Request

Dear Mr. Ursitt,

Thanks for the reply.  You can send the larger files to:  333exemptions@faa.gov.  Please note any files which contain

confidential material and reference your  company name and docket number (FAA‐2014‐0886).  We will begin

processing your application as soon as we have the additional information.

Best regards,

Jim Kenney

From: dursitti@buildimagery.com [mailto:dursitti@buildimagery.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 1:24 PM 

To: Kenney, James (FAA) 

Subject: RE: Section 333 Exemption Request 

Mr Kenny 

Mr Kenny 

Thank you for getting in touch with us in regards to completing our petition packet. We have evaluated 

our prime usage scope and see our main focus in and around the AEC community. For this reason we will 

use our 'Build Imagery UAS Operations Manual' as our standard operations and flight guideline for all 

types of flight. For this we will not be including a separate Motion Picture Operational Manuel. We will 

always look to the FAA as well as local and national groups to understand better practices and advances in

operational safety. 

I have also included letters from various project executives from the different projects we are working 

with currently. We pride ourselves on safety in the work place and the UAS usage is considered 

exponentially. I request from your group any guidance or assistance on improving our procedures and 

understand to create the best circumstances and conditions fro UAS usage.

I am trying to send you the additional information but my emails are getting sent back undelivered due to 

maximum message size was exceeded. Can you please give me an alternate deliver method. 

Best regards, 

Daniel Ursitt 

Dursitti@buildimagery.com 

WWW.BUILDIMAGERY.COM 

C:310-467-6006 

-------- Original Message -------- 

Subject: Section 333 Exemption Request 

From: <James.Kenney@faa.gov> 
2

Date: Tue, February 24, 2015 5:41 am 

To: <Dursitti@Buildimagery.com> 

Dear Mr. Ursitti, 

 

We are currently evaluating your petition and would like you to address the 

following issues: 

 

1. Your petition references a Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM). We have received a 

Build Imagery UAS Operations Manual. Please verify that this is the same manual or kindly 

provide a copy of the missing manual. 

2. Your petition also references a Motion Picture Television Operations Manual. Please provide a 

copy of this manual. 

3. Please provide copies of operators manuals or flight manuals for the Iris+ and Inspire 1. 

 

We are obligated to complete our evaluation of your petition next week, therefore 

kindly provide any additional materials which you would like us to consider by 

close of business on February 27. Thank you for your assistance. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

James Kenney 

Aviation Safety Inspector
#### § 802.207 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Redpoint Bio Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, F. Raymond Salemme, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|Dated: March 14, 2008 |  | /s/F. RAYMOND SALEMME, PH.D.*F. Raymond Salemme, Ph.D.* President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 10(ee)

                           COVER-ALL TECHNOLOGIES INC.
                               18-01 Pollitt Drive
                           FAIR LAWN, NEW JERSEY 07410


                                                     September 29, 1999


Care Corporation Limited
c/o Gardere & Wynne, L.L.P.
1601 Elm Street, Suite 3000
Dallas, Texas 75201
Attention:  Alan J. Perkins, Esq.

         Re:   Secured Promissory Note of Care Corporation Limited
               ("Care"), dated as of March 31, 1998 (the "Note")

Dear Sir:

     Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Note, a Semi-Annual Payment of
$500,000 of principal is due and payable on September 30, 1999 (the "Autumn 1999
Payment"). By this letter, Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), as Holder, hereby agrees that the date of the Autumn 1999
Payment and the recalculation of the required Pledged Collateral pursuant to the
Pledge Agreement, dated as of March 31, 1998, by and between Care and the
Company (the "Pledge Agreement"), shall be extended from September 30, 1999 to
November 15, 1999.

     Except as amended in this letter, the terms and conditions of the Note and
the Pledge Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Capitalized terms
used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Note or Pledge Agreement, as applicable.

                                                  Very truly yours,


                                                  COVER-ALL TECHNOLOGIES INC.


                                                  By: /s/ Brian Magowan
                                                      --------------------------
                                                        Name: Brian Magowan
                                                        Title: Chairman and CEO
§ 702.225 Withdrawal of a claim. ( a ) *Before adjudication of claim.* A claimant (or an individual who is authorized to execute a claim on his behalf) may withdraw his previously filed claim: *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) He files with the district director with whom the claim was filed a written request stating the reasons for withdrawal;
( 2 ) The claimant is alive at the time his request for withdrawal is filed;
( 3 ) The district director approves the request for withdrawal as being for a proper purpose and in the claimant's best interest; and
( 4 ) The request for withdrawal is filed, on or before the date the OWCP makes a determination on the claim.
( b ) *After adjudication of claim.* A claim for benefits may be withdrawn by a written request filed after the date the OWCP makes a determination on the claim: *Provided,* That: ( 1 ) The conditions enumerated in paragraphs (a) (1) through (3) of this section are met; and
( 2 ) There is repayment of the amount of benefits previously paid because of the claim that is being withdrawn or it can be established to the satisfaction of the Office that repayment of any such amount is assured.
( c ) *Effect of withdrawal of claim.* Where a request for withdrawal of a claim is filed and such request for withdrawal is approved, such withdrawal shall be without prejudice to the filing of another claim, subject to the time limitation provisions of section 13 of the Act and of the regulations in this part.
[38 FR 26861, Sept. 26, 1973. Redesignated at 50 FR 397, Jan. 3, 1985]
§ 704.101 Administration; compensation districts. For the purpose of administration of this Act areas assigned to the compensation districts established for administration of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act as set forth in part 702 of this subchapter shall be extended in the following manner to include: ( a ) Canada, east of the 75th degree west longitude, Newfoundland, and Greenland are assigned to District No. 1.
( b ) Canada, west of the 75th degree and east of the 110th degree west longitude, is assigned to District No. 10.
( c ) Canada, west of the 110th degree west longitude, and all areas in the Pacific Ocean north of the 45th degree north latitude are assigned to District No. 14.
( d ) All areas west of the continents of North and South America (except coastal islands) to the 60th degree east longitude, except for Iran, are assigned to District No. 15.
( e ) Mexico, Central and South America (including coastal islands); areas east of the continents of North and South America to the 60th degree east longitude, including Iran, and any other areas or locations not covered under any other district office, are assigned to District No. 2.