alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §887. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–723, §52(1), Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 847

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §442, 60 Stat. 1006, provided for establishment of new group of positions, known as subclasses, for officers and employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective the first day of first pay period which begins more than thirty days after Sept. 8, 1960, see Pub. L. 86–723, §56(a), Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 848.
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 835 194 460

2 635 211 418

3 765 262 457

4 908 238 488

5 1,032 242 513

6 986 217 524

7 937 204 494

8 854 216 471

9 960 189 480

10 1,148 198 571

11 910 239 521

12 627 209 435

13 493 198 376

14 427 176 335

15 410 179 323

16 428 184 329

17 548 188 339

18 575 188 344

19 556 188 328

20 586 204 359

21 614 206 382

22 669 216 403

23 681 220 428

24 658 237 417

25 639 215 397

26 680 224 411

27 785 218 442

28 543 210 378

29 452 200 325

30 450 187 276

31 537 175 280

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Andreas On The San Joaquin River 

Period: December 2022 Run Date: 1/4/2023
TSCA Section 5(e) Modified Consent Order for 

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) P-95-0169 

EPA Docket: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0669 

Effective May 9, 2006 

Contains No CBI Page 1 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 2 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 3 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 4 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 5 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 6 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 7 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 8 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 9 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 10 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 11 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 12 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 13 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 14 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 15 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 16 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 17 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 18 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 19 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 20 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 21 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 22 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 23 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 24 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 25 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 26 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 27 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 28 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 29 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 30 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 31 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 32 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 33 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 34 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 35 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 36 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 36 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 37 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 37 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 38 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 38 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 39 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 39 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 40 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 40 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 41 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 41 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 42 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 42 of 43
Contains No CBI Page 43 of 43 EPA SANITIZED Page 43 of 43
#### Jacob Rubin et al., Copartners Doing Business as Max Rubin & Sons, Respondents, v. 8008 Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously *882modified by denying the motion to consolidate unless plaintiffs consent to have the consolidated action placed on the nonjury calendar for an early date. In the • absence of such a consent, the order is reversed and the motion to consolidate denied. Settle order.on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., G-lennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See *post,*p. 1007.]
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Graeme McNeill, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of Wolf Resources, Inc for the year ended July 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Wolf Resources, Inc.

Date: July 28, 2009


/s/ Graeme McNeill
--------------------------------------
Graeme McNeill
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director
### §9261. Definitions

In this subtitle,1 the terms "applicable Executive order", "applicable United Nations Security Council resolution", "appropriate congressional committees", "Government of North Korea", "North Korea", "North Korean financial institution", and "North Korean person" have the meanings given those terms in section 9202 of this title.

(Pub. L. 116–92, div. F, title LXXI, §7112, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2244.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subtitle, referred to in text, is subtitle A of title LXXI of div. F of Pub. L. 116–92, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 2244, which enacted this subchapter and sections 262p–13, 286yy, 9221b, and 9221c of this title, amended sections 9202, 9212, 9214, 9223, 9224, 9228, 9241, and 9251 of this title, repealed sections 262p–13 and 286yy of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 262p–13 and 286yy of this title. For complete classification of this subtitle to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Otto Warmbier North Korea Nuclear Sanctions and Enforcement Act of 2019, and also as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, and not as part of the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act of 2016 which comprises this chapter.

1 See References in Text note below.
(GRAPHIC)
    
    SCOTIABANK (IRELAND) LIMITEDI.F.S.C. House, Custom House Quay, Dublin 1, Ireland. 
Telephone: Dublin 353-1-790 2000 Fax: 353-1-670-0684 
S.W.I.F.T. Address: NOSCIE 2X
  
 For the attention of Mr. Andrew Simmons
  AMENDMENT LETTER
 Stealthgas Inc. Facility Agreement For A USD46,875,000 Term Loan dated June 21 2007, as
amended by, among others, Supplemental Agreement dated 8 January 2008
   by deleting the definition of Margin and replacing it with:
 Margin
  by amending the definition of Required
Security Amount to read
 Required Security Amount
 by amending the definition of Security Value to read:
 Security Value
  Directors:   Registered In Ireland 30350, A wholly owned subsidiary of The Bank of Nova Scotia International Limited
Scotiabank (Ireland) Limited Is authorised and regulated by the Financial Regulator In Ireland




---



##### 



-2- 
  Yours sincerely/s/ Daniel Muldoon
Scotiabank (Ireland) Limited
STEALTHGAS INC
P.O. Box 1405, Majuro
Ajeltake Road, Ajeltake Island, Majuro
MH96960, Marshall Islands/s/ Andrew J. SimmonsName:
    Andrew J. SimmonsTitle:
    CFO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         102,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,894,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,084,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,443,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,132,000
<PP&E>                                       8,229,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,749,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,048,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,754,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,177,000
<COMMON>                                       167,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,592,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,048,000
<SALES>                                     18,117,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,117,000
<CGS>                                       12,789,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,135,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               674,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             479,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                308,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            288,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   288,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 398.70

 399.72

 400.63

 400.64

 400.64

 400.61

 400.58

 400.56

 400.53

 400.50

 400.47

 400.69

 401.28

 401.50

 402.08

 402.25

 402.55

 403.22

 403.76

 404.03

 404.26

 404.80

 404.95

 405.10

 405.64

 406.89

 407.48

 408.26

 409.60

 410.06

 512,607

 520,680

 527,922

 528,002

 528,002

 527,763

 527,523

 527,364

 527,125

 526,885

 526,646

 528,401

 533,118

 534,881

 539,538

 540,907

 543,324

 548,737

 553,115

 555,309

 557,180

 561,582

 562,808

 564,034

 568,456

 578,743

 583,623

 590,097

 601,282

 605,139

STORAGE

+10,377

+8,073

+7,242

+80

+0

-239

-240

-159

-239

-240

-239

+1,755

+4,717

+1,763

+4,657

+1,369

+2,417

+5,413

+4,378

+2,194

+1,871

+4,402

+1,226

+1,226

+4,422

+10,287

+4,880

+6,474

+11,185

+3,857

CHANGE

5,891

4,515

4,084

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,405

2,793

928

2,786

922

1,275

3,298

2,571

1,353

1,238

2,663

873

875

2,680

5,962

2,948

3,916

6,372

1,875

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 68

 72

 41

 71

 34

 24

 24

 25

 50

 60

 62

 60

 65

 23

 23

 26

 72

 73

 65

 74

 77

 70

 105

 115

 130

 137

 120

 114

 112

 153

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-591

-373

-391

+111

+34

-96

-97

-55

-71

-60

-58

-460

-350

-17

-415

-205

+15

-496

-298

-173

-218

-374

-150

-142

-321

-639

-368

-538

-620

+222

OR

 22

 21

 28

 28

 52

 39

 39

 47

 39

 23

 21

 16

 26

 29

 26

 39

 34

 26

 53

 24

 18

 21

 24

 19

 24

 19

 21

 30

 54

 54

C.F.S.

 .09

 .08

 .11

 .11

 .20

 .15

 .15

 .18

 .15

 .09

 .09

 .06

 .10

 .11

 .10

 .15

 .13

 .10

 .20

 .09

 .07

 .08

 .09

 .07

 .09

 .07

 .08

 .11

 .20

 .20

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR December 1, 2009

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2009 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +102,909 61,223 0 2,145 0 -7,194 916 3.50 .07

ACRE-FEET +102,909 121,436 0 4,255 0 -14,269 1,817

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 4,255 TOTAL 4,255

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2009 TO DATE = 2.02

 502,230

SPILL 0 .07

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.
#### Dorothy H. Golwynne, Respondent, v. Henry A. Golwynne, Appellant.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
(No. 74-CC-229

#### Humma’s Drug Store, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Humma’s Drug Store, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 684.250 Can an Indian and Native American grantee's grant award be terminated? ( a ) Yes, the Grant Officer can terminate a grantee's award for cause, or the Secretary or another Department of Labor official confirmed by the Senate can terminate a grantee's award in emergency circumstances where termination is necessary to protect the integrity of Federal funds or ensure the proper operation of the program under sec. 184(e) of WIOA.
( b ) The Grant Officer may terminate a grantee's award for cause only if there is a substantial or persistent violation of the requirements in WIOA or the WIOA regulations. The grantee must be provided with written notice 60 days before termination, stating the specific reasons why termination is proposed. The appeal procedures at § 683.800 of this chapter apply.
(No. 7059

#### Acan X-Ray—Michigan, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 2, 1973.*

Acan X-Ray—Michigan, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

*220William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §4835. Relation to other proceedings

#### (a) No effect on existing remedies or defenses

Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to create administrative or judicial review remedies or rights of action not otherwise available by law, nor shall any provision of this subchapter be construed to deprive any person of any right or legal defense which would otherwise be available to that person under any law, rule, or regulation.

#### (b) Future inquiries

Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to preclude the Secretary of State from convening a follow-up public board of inquiry to investigate any security incident if the incident was of such magnitude or significance that an internal process is deemed insufficient to understand and investigate the incident. All materials gathered during the procedures provided under this subchapter shall be provided to any related board of inquiry convened by the Secretary.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title III, §305, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 862; Pub. L. 117–263, div. I, title XCIII, §9302(h), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3888.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2022—Pub. L. 117–263 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted heading, and added subsec. (b).
§ 618.525 Determinations, redeterminations, and appeals. ( a ) *Determinations, redeterminations, and appeals.* States must apply the requirements of §§ 618.820 (determinations of eligibility; notices to individuals) and 618.828 (appeals and hearings), respectively, to all determinations, redeterminations, and appeals under this subpart. ( 1 ) Before issuing a determination or redetermination, the State must verify and document the AAW's age, reemployment, and wages in determining whether the worker has met eligibility requirements of § 618.505(a).
( 2 ) A determination of eligibility issued to an AAW must include a notice that the benefit amount will be regularly recomputed (as required by § 618.515(d)) and will change if the eligible AAW's reemployment wages change.
( 3 ) An AAW denied individual eligibility based on nonqualifying reemployment may file a new application for a subsequent reemployment.
( 4 ) A State may approve an RTAA payment retroactively if an AAW becomes reemployed before the Department issues a certification under subpart B of this part, provided that the AAW otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of § 618.505(a).
( b ) *Recordkeeping requirements.* The recordkeeping and disclosure of information requirements of § 618.852 apply to the State's administration of RTAA.
#### § 609.22 Correcting Federal findings.

If a Federal agency ascertains at any time within one year after it has returned a completed form reporting its findings, that any of its findings were erroneous, it shall promptly correct its error and forward its corrected findings to the State agency.
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3194

___________ Christopher Lee Prosser, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Mary Weeks; Arthur Sommer; Emile * Eastern District of Missouri. Schneider; Unknown Golden; Unknown * Rushing; Mark Houston; Dallas * [UNPUBLISHED] McDowell; Michael Jones; Raymond * Stock, * * Defendants - Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: December 11, 1997 Filed: March 25, 1998

___________ Before WOLLMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Christopher L. Prosser was convicted of second-degree murder for the death of his live-in girlfriend’s two year old daughter, Rockie Krieb. He nowThe HONORABLE CATHERINE D. PERRY, United States District Judge for 1 the Eastern District of Missouri. -2- appeals various district court orders , primarily the court’s grant of summary judgment 1 dismissing Prosser’s § 1983 damage claims against St. L ouis County police and animal control officers and private citizens involved in the search and seizures accompanying his arrest. A fter careful review of the record and the briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s thoroug h Memorandum and Order dated July 11, 1996, its earlier p rotective orders, and its Order taxing costs dated August 14, 1996. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
We further conclude that Prosser and his attorney, Richard L. Beaver, hav e pursued a vexatious and frivolous app eal. After the district court denied Prosser leave to appeal in forma pauperis on the ground that “an appeal from this matter would not b e taken in good faith,” attorney Beaver filed a meritless fifty-page brief and twentyfive page reply brief. We therefore order Prosser and Beaver to show cause withi n twenty days why we should not award against them, jointly and severally, double costs t o gether with appellees’ attorney’s fees on appeal. See Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appell ate Procedure; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1912, 1927; Slack v. St. Louis County Govt. , 919 F.2d 98, 100 (8th Cir. 1990); Anselmo v. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co. , 771 F.2d 417, 421 (8th Cir. 1985). A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdjusting Measured Weight Loss of Aged Graphite Fabric/PMR-15 CompositesThe purposes of this study were to evaluate the growth of the surface damage layer in polymer matrix composites (PMC's) fabricated with graphite fabric reinforcement and to determine the effects of the cut-surface degradation on the overall thermo-oxidative (TOS) stability of these materials. Four important conclusions were made about the TOS behavior of T650-35/PNIR- 15 fabric-reinforced composites: (1) Three stages of composite weight loss were seen on the plot of weight loss versus aging time; (2) the depth of the cut-edge damage is related to the composite thickness; (3) the actual weight loss realized by a mechanical test specimen that has had all the aging-induced cut-edge damage removed during the preparation process is significantly less than the weight loss measured using specimens with a high percentage of cut edges exposed to the damaging environment; and (4) an extrapolation of a section of the weight loss curve can be used to obtain a more correct estimate of the actual weight loss after extended periods of aging at elevated temperatures.Document ID19980073120Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBowles, Kenneth J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 1, 1998Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-113175E-10929NAS 1.15:113175Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-06-15Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980073120.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 670.470 May a person who is determined to be ineligible or an individual who is denied enrollment appeal that decision? ( a ) A person who is determined to be ineligible to participate in Job Corps under § 670.400 or a person who is not selected for enrollment under § 670.410 may appeal the determination to the outreach and admissions agency or to the center within 60 days of the determination. The appeal will be resolved according to the procedures in §§ 670.990 and 670.991. If the appeal is denied by the outreach/admissions contractor or the center, the person may appeal the decision in writing to the Regional Director within 60 days the date of the denial. The Regional Director will decide within 60 days whether to reverse or approve the appealed decision. The decision by the Regional Director is the Department's final decision.
( b ) If an applicant believes that he or she has been determined ineligible or not selected for enrollment based upon a factor prohibited by WIA section 188, the individual may proceed under the applicable DOL nondiscrimination regulations implementing WIA section 188. These regulations may be found at 29 CFR part 37.
( c ) An applicant who is determined to be ineligible or a person who is denied enrollment must be referred to the appropriate One-Stop Center or other local service provider.
§ 703.210 Increase or reduction in security deposit amount. ( a ) Whenever the Office considers the security deposited by an insurance carrier insufficient to fully secure the carrier's LHWCA obligations, the carrier must, upon demand by the Branch, deposit additional security in accordance with the regulations in this part in an amount fixed by the Branch. The Branch will issue its decision requiring additional security in accordance with § 703.204, and the procedures set forth at §§ 703.204(d) and 703.205 for requesting a hearing and complying with the Office's decision will apply as appropriate.
( b ) The Branch may reduce the required security at any time on its own initiative, or upon application of a carrier, when in the Branch's opinion the facts warrant a reduction. A carrier seeking a reduction must furnish any information the Office requests regarding its outstanding LHWCA obligations for any State in which it does business, its obligations not secured by a State guaranty fund in each of these States, and any other evidence as the Branch considers necessary.