alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION  1350 AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of UCI
Medical Affiliates, Inc. ("UCI"), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report
of UCI on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI. This written
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided
to UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

August 7, 2007            /s/ D.  Michael Stout, M.D.
                          --------------------------------------------
                          D.  Michael Stout, M.D.
                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                          /s/ Jerry F.  Wells, Jr., CPA
                          --------------------------------------------
                          Jerry F.  Wells, Jr., CPA
                          Executive Vice President,  Chief  Financial  Officer,
                          and Principal Accounting Officer
### §445. Travel on vessels of belligerent states

#### (a) Proscription by Presidential proclamation

Whenever the President shall have issued a proclamation under the authority of section 441(a) of this title it shall thereafter be unlawful for any citizen of the United States to travel on any vessel of any state named in such proclamation, except in accordance with such rules and regulations as may be prescribed.

#### (b) Revocation of proclamation; effect

Whenever any proclamation issued under the authority of section 441(a) of this title shall have been revoked with respect to any state the provisions of this section shall thereupon cease to apply with respect to such state, except as to offenses committed prior to such revocation.

(Nov. 4, 1939, ch. 2, §5, 54 Stat. 7.)
Exhibit 24.4

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of New Page Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of
NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint David J. Prystash, Douglas K. Cooper, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, with full power to act without the
others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in connection with the Form
10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of
Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 23rd day of February, 2009.



/s/ John W. SheridanSignaturePrint Name:

John W. Sheridan
EXHIBIT 15.1

Consent of Independent RegisteredPublic Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in thefollowing Registration Statements:

(1) Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-200169) pertaining to the Foster Wheeler AG Omnibus Incentive Plan, AMEC Savings Related Share Option Scheme 2005,AMEC Restricted Share Plan and AMEC Performance Share Plan of Amec Foster Wheeler plc; and

(2) Registration Statement (FormS-8 No. 333-204356) pertaining to the Amec Foster Wheeler plc Long-term Incentive Plan 2015 and Amec Foster Wheeler InternationalSavings Related Share Option Scheme of Amec Foster Wheeler plc;

of our reports dated 10 March 2016, with respect tothe consolidated financial statements and schedules of Amec Foster Wheeler plc and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Amec Foster Wheeler plc included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Amec Foster Wheeler plc for the year ended 31December 2015.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

London, England

23 March 2016
§ 10010.23 Timing. ( a ) The feasibility analysis (go/no-go) stage, at which time an EIS is to be completed, is to be interpreted as the stage prior to the first point of major commitment to the proposal.
( b ) An EIS need not be commenced until an application is essentially complete; e.g., any required environmental information is submitted, any consultation required with other agencies has been conducted, and any required advance funding is paid by the applicant or other appropriate party.
### §407. Discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and surveys

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data compiled or collected for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, or planning the safety enhancement of potential accident sites, hazardous roadway conditions, or railway-highway crossings, pursuant to sections 130, 144, and 148 of this title or for the purpose of developing any highway safety construction improvement project which may be implemented utilizing Federal-aid highway funds shall not be subject to discovery or admitted into evidence in a Federal or State court proceeding or considered for other purposes in any action for damages arising from any occurrence at a location mentioned or addressed in such reports, surveys, schedules, lists, or data.

(Added Pub. L. 100–17, title I, §132(a), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 170, §409; amended Pub. L. 102–240, title I, §1035(a), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1978; Pub. L. 104–59, title III, §323, Nov. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 591; Pub. L. 109–59, title I, §1401(a)(3)(C), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1225; renumbered §407, Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title IV, §24101(d)(1)(A), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 784.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 407, added Pub. L. 95–599, title II, §208(a), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2732, related to innovative project grants, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 112–141, §3(a), div. C, title I, §31109(c), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 413, 756, effective Oct. 1, 2012.

#### Amendments

2021—Pub. L. 117–58, which directed the amendment of this chapter by renumbering section 409 "and" section 407, was executed by renumbering section 409 as this section as if "and" had read "as", to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
### SUBCHAPTER XI—KLAMATH TRIBE: PAYMENTS IN LIEU OF ALLOTMENTS; INHERITANCE OF RESTRICTED PROPERTY
#### § 672.605 What are the reporting requirements for youth safety?

YouthBuild grantees must ensure that YouthBuild program sites comply with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) reporting requirements in 29 CFR part 1904. A YouthBuild grantee is responsible for sending a copy of OSHA's injury incident report form, to U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration within 7 days of any reportable injury suffered by a YouthBuild participant. The injury incident report form is available from OSHA and can be downloaded at *http://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/RKforms.html.* Reportable injuries include those that result in death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness.
### §192. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(k), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3380

Section, acts July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309; Aug. 29, 1916, ch. 417, 39 Stat. 558; Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 79, 40 Stat. 373, related to admission to Saint Elizabeths Hospital of insane prisoners of war and interned persons.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
### §8771. Exclusion of citizens of Iran seeking education relating to the nuclear and energy sectors of Iran

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of State shall deny a visa to, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall exclude from the United States, any alien who is a citizen of Iran that the Secretary of State determines seeks to enter the United States to participate in coursework at an institution of higher education (as defined in section 1001(a) of title 20) to prepare the alien for a career in the energy sector of Iran or in nuclear science or nuclear engineering or a related field in Iran.

#### (b) Applicability

Subsection (a) applies with respect to visa applications filed on or after August 10, 2012.

(Pub. L. 112–158, title V, §501, Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1258.)

#### Termination of Section

For termination of section, see section 8785(a) of this title.
### §3715. Establishment of Compensation Fund

There is established in the Treasury of the United States the Panama Canal Commission Compensation Fund (hereafter in this Act referred to as the "Fund").

(Pub. L. 100–705, §2, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4685.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 100–705, Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4685, known as the Panama Canal Commission Compensation Fund Act of 1988, which enacted sections 3715 to 3715d of this title, amended sections 3612, 3712, and 3731 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as notes under sections 3601 and 3612 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title of 1988 Amendment note set out under section 3601 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Panama Canal Commission Compensation Fund Act of 1988, and not as part of the Panama Canal Act of 1979 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1988, see section 10 of Pub. L. 100–705, set out as an Effective Date of 1988 Amendment note under section 3612 of this title.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4325 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to modify the anticipated 

value of certain contracts reserved exclusively for small 

business concerns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4325 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unifying Small Busi3 ness Terminology Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE ANTICIPATED VALUE OF 

5 CERTAIN CONTRACTS RESERVED EXCLU6 SIVELY FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 15(j)(1) of the Small 

8 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘greater than $2,500 but not greater than $100,000’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘greater than the micro-purchase threshold de11 fined in section 1902(a) of title 41, United States Code, 

12 but not greater than the simplified acquisition threshold’’. 

13 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 3(m) of the 

14 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(m)) is amended to 

15 read as follows: 

16 ‘‘(m) SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD.—In 

17 this Act, the term ‘simplified acquisition threshold’ has the 

18 meaning given such term in section 134 of title 41, United 

19 States Code.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndium Tin Oxide-Magnesium Fluoride Co-Deposited Films for Spacecraft ApplicationsHighly transparent coatings with a maximum sheet resistivity between 10(exp 8) and 10(exp 9) ohms/square are desired to prevent charging of solar arrays for low Earth polar orbit and geosynchronous orbit missions. Indium tin oxide (ITO) and magnesium fluoride (MgF2) were ion beam sputter co-deposited onto fused silica substrates and were evaluated for transmittance, sheet resistivity and the effects of simulated space environments including atomic oxygen (AO) and vacuum ultraviolet (VUV) radiation. Optical properties and sheet resistivity as a function of MgF2 content in the films will be presented. Films containing 8.4 wt.% MgF2 were found to be highly transparent and provided sheet resistivity in the required range. These films maintained a high transmittance upon exposure to AO and to VUV radiation, although exposure to AO in the presence of charged species and intense electromagnetic radiation caused significant degradation in film transmittance. Sheet resistivity of the as-fabricated films increased with time in ambient conditions. Vacuum beat treatment following film deposition caused a reduction in sheet resistivity. However, following vacuum heat treatment, sheet resistivity values remained stable during storage in ambient conditions.Document ID19980235566Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsDever, Joycer A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Rutledge, Sharon K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Hambourger, Paul D.*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Bruckner, Eric*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Ferrante, Rhea*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Pal, Anna Marie*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Mayer, Karen*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Pietromica, Anthony J.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Brook Park, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1998Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208499NAS 1.15:208499E-11297Meeting InformationMeeting: Metallurgical Coatings and Thin FilmsLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 24, 1996End Date: April 26, 1996Sponsors:American Vacuum SocietyFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 632-1A-1EDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980235566.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Alois Bay and Another, Respondents, v. Maria A. O’Brien, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                              66
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,716
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,716
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,116
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,213
<OTHER-SE>                                    (65,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,716
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of CrowdGather, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Sanjay
Sabnani, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
CrowdGather, Inc., and will be retained by CrowdGather, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  /s/
      Sanjay SabnaniSanjay
      Sabnani
                  Chief Financial Officer
                  July  29,
      2008
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*John Clark, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58453;

First District (5th Division) —

July 13, 1973.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Lee T. Hettinger, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis, Mariann Twist, and Nicholas P. Lavarone, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

SULLIVAN, J., took no part.
§ 726.312 Burdens of proof. ( a ) The Director shall bear the burden of proving the existence of a violation, and the time period for which the violation occurred. To prove a violation, the Director must establish: ( 1 ) That the person against whom the penalty is assessed is an operator, or is the president, secretary, or treasurer of an operator, if such operator is a corporation.
( 2 ) That the operator violated section 423 of the Act and § 726.4. The filing of a complaint shall be considered *prima facie* evidence that the Director has searched the records maintained by OWCP and has determined that the operator was not authorized to self-insure its liability under the Act for the time period in question, and that no insurance carrier reported coverage of the operator for the time period in question.
( b ) The Director need not produce further evidence in support of his burden of proof with respect to the issues set forth in paragraph (a) if no party contested them pursuant to § 726.307(b)(3).
( c ) The Director shall bear the burden of proving the size of the operator as required by § 726.302, except that if the Director has requested the operator to supply information with respect to its size under § 726.303 and the operator has not fully complied with that request, it shall be presumed that the operator has more than 100 employees engaged in coal mine employment. The person or persons liable for the assessment shall thereafter bear the burden of proving the actual number of employees engaged in coal mine employment.
( d ) The Director shall bear the burden of proving the operator's receipt of the notification required by § 726.303, the operator's prior notice of the applicability of the Black Lung Benefits Act to its operations, and the existence of any previous assessment against the operator, the operator's principals, or the operator's officers.
( e ) The person or persons liable for an assessment shall bear the burden of proving the applicability of the mitigating factors listed in § 726.302(d).
§ 683.205 What administrative cost limitations apply to Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act title I grants? ( a ) *State formula grants.* ( 1 ) As part of the 15 percent that a State may reserve for statewide activities, the State may spend up to 5 percent of the amount allotted under secs. 127(b)(1), 132(b)(1), and 132(b)(2) of WIOA for the administrative costs of statewide activities.
( 2 ) Local area expenditures for administrative purposes under WIOA formula grants are limited to no more than 10 percent of the amount allocated to the local area under secs. 128(b) and 133(b) of WIOA.
( 3 ) The 5 percent reserved for statewide administrative costs and the 10 percent reserved for local administrative costs may be used for administrative costs for any of the statewide youth workforce investment activities or statewide employment and training activities under secs. 127(b)(1), 128(b), 132(b), and 133(b) of WIOA.
( 4 ) In a one-stop environment, administrative costs borne by other sources of funds, such as the Wagner-Peyser Act, are not included in the administrative cost limit calculation. Each program's administrative activities are chargeable to its own grant and subject to its own administrative cost limitations.
( 5 ) Costs of negotiating a MOU or infrastructure funding agreement under title I of WIOA are excluded from the administrative cost limitations.
( b ) *Discretionary grants.* Limits on administrative costs, if any, for programs operated under subtitle D of title I of WIOA will be identified in the grant or cooperative agreement.