alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §9527. Sanctions with respect to investment in or facilitation of privatization of State-owned assets by the Russian Federation

#### (a) In general

The President shall impose five or more of the sanctions described in section 9529 of this title if the President determines that a person, with actual knowledge, on or after August 2, 2017, makes an investment of $10,000,000 or more (or any combination of investments of not less than $1,000,000 each, which in the aggregate equals or exceeds $10,000,000 in any 12-month period), or facilitates such an investment, if the investment directly and significantly contributes to the ability of the Russian Federation to privatize state-owned assets in a manner that unjustly benefits—

(1) officials of the Government of the Russian Federation; or

(2) close associates or family members of those officials.

#### (b) Application of new sanctions

The President may waive the initial application of sanctions under subsection (a) with respect to a person only if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees—

(1) a written determination that the waiver—

(A) is in the vital national security interests of the United States; or

(B) will further the enforcement of this chapter; and

(2) a certification that the Government of the Russian Federation is taking steps to implement the Minsk Agreement to address the ongoing conflict in eastern Ukraine, signed in Minsk, Belarus, on February 11, 2015, by the leaders of Ukraine, Russia, France, and Germany, the Minsk Protocol, which was agreed to on September 5, 2014, and any successor agreements that are agreed to by the Government of Ukraine.

(Pub. L. 115–44, title II, §233, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 917.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(B), was in the original "this title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 115–44, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 898, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see section 201 of Pub. L. 115–44, set out as a Short Title note under section 9501 of this title and Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 721.84

 722.11

 722.38

 722.68

 722.98

 722.98

 723.47

 723.67

 723.85

 720.46

 720.70

 720.90

 723.15

 723.79

 735.42

 737.30

 731.02

 723.94

 720.32

 721.92

 723.16

 724.26

 721.52

 722.82

 724.60

 722.15

 733.10

 737.67

 738.72

 737.81

 737.23

 1,253

 1,263

 1,273

 1,284

 1,295

 1,295

 1,314

 1,321

 1,328

 1,203

 1,211

 1,218

 1,302

 1,326

 1,813

 1,900

 1,619

 1,332

 1,198

 1,256

 1,302

 1,344

 1,241

 1,289

 1,357

 1,265

 1,709

 1,918

 1,969

 1,925

 1,897

STORAGE

-92

+10

+10

+11

+11

+0

+19

+7

+7

-125

+8

+7

+84

+24

+487

+87

-281

-287

-134

+58

+46

+42

-103

+48

+68

-92

+444

+209

+51

-44

-28

CHANGE

-2

7

8

9

9

3

13

7

7

-9

7

7

44

32

278

235

100

39

21

31

25

23

9

28

36

27

369

349

151

260

200

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 44

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 54

 3

 3

 2

 20

 32

 191

 242

 184

 89

 2

 2

 2

 61

 4

 2

 73

 145

 244

 125

 282

 214

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 6, 2012

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +552 2,323 0 2,043

ACRE-FEET +552 4,608 0 4,052

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 4,052

 4,052

 1,345

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
### §9614. Independent accountability mechanism

#### (a) In general

The Board shall establish a transparent and independent accountability mechanism.

#### (b) Functions

The independent accountability mechanism established pursuant to subsection (a) shall—

(1) annually evaluate and report to the Board and Congress regarding compliance with environmental, social, labor, human rights, and transparency standards, consistent with Corporation statutory mandates;

(2) provide a forum for resolving concerns regarding the impacts of specific Corporation-supported projects with respect to such standards; and

(3) provide advice regarding Corporation projects, policies, and practices.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. F, title I, §1415, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3492.)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of RealD Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 25, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael V. Lewis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ MICHAEL V. LEWIS Michael V. Lewis Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
(Principal Executive Officer)June 9, 2011


*This
certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the registrant, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation
language in such filing.


---



QuickLinks
STORAGE - A.F. CHANGE SHASTA NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV

IRON

CANYON PIT 6 PIT 7

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S

RIVER 

C.F.S

NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 36,745 16,765 12,897 13,148 32,725 112,280 180 91 4,161 4,252 1,403.8

2 36,745 16,665 11,828 13,350 33,154 111,742 -538 -271 4,691 4,420 1,412.6

3 36,673 16,483 11,302 14,374 32,201 111,033 -709 -357 4,750 4,393 1,421.3

4 36,673 16,483 11,302 14,374 32,201 111,033 0 0 4,473 5,231 1,431.7

5 36,673 16,483 11,302 14,374 32,201 111,033 0 0 4,559 4,559 1,440.7

6 36,590 16,040 12,201 15,013 28,669 108,513 -2,520 -1,270 4,924 3,654 1,448.0

7 36,637 16,004 11,831 15,018 28,669 108,159 -354 -178 4,292 4,114 1,456.1

8 36,673 15,953 11,924 13,229 30,380 108,159 0 0 4,012 4,012 1,464.1

9 36,709 15,921 12,189 11,727 31,388 107,934 -225 -113 4,245 4,132 1,472.3

10 36,649 15,822 10,785 12,009 31,994 107,259 -675 -340 4,573 3,921 1,480.1

11 36,649 15,621 10,343 10,870 33,472 106,955 -304 -153 4,731 4,578 1,489.2

12 36,602 15,416 10,045 11,483 33,320 106,866 -89 -45 4,591 3,825 1,496.7

13 36,578 15,208 10,360 9,511 33,296 104,953 -1,913 -964 4,359 3,395 1,503.5

14 36,590 15,141 11,177 9,115 32,939 104,962 9 5 4,722 4,727 1,512.8

15 36,637 15,217 11,763 7,859 30,307 101,783 -3,179 -1,603 5,491 3,888 1,520.6

16 36,661 15,339 11,992 8,162 23,801 95,955 -5,828 -2,938 7,555 4,617 1,529.7

17 36,637 15,422 11,437 11,267 19,833 94,596 -1,359 -685 5,394 4,709 1,539.1

18 36,614 15,342 10,321 12,383 24,907 99,567 4,971 2,506 1,943 4,449 1,547.9

19 36,566 15,235 11,127 11,752 26,409 101,089 1,522 767 3,021 3,788 1,555.4

20 36,578 15,241 11,422 13,079 28,694 105,014 3,925 1,979 1,984 3,963 1,563.3

21 36,590 15,266 10,965 13,129 30,506 106,456 1,442 727 3,578 4,305 1,571.8

22 36,614 15,278 11,711 13,186 31,437 108,226 1,770 892 2,604 3,618 1,579.0

23 36,602 15,370 11,662 13,050 31,220 107,904 -322 -162 3,973 3,811 1,586.5

24 36,614 15,382 11,453 13,331 31,070 107,850 -54 -27 3,828 3,569 1,593.6

25 36,625 15,391 11,495 12,695 31,994 108,200 350 176 3,565 3,741 1,601.0

26 36,566 15,425 11,763 13,209 31,543 108,506 306 154 3,990 4,144 1,609.3

27 36,673 16,483 11,302 14,374 32,201 111,033 2,527 1,274 3,614 4,928 1,619.0

28 36,673 16,483 11,302 14,374 32,201 111,033 0 0 3,383 3,383 1,625.7

Totals -1,067 116,126

Acre - Feet 230,336

* October 1, 2021 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At Shasta Dam

Run Date: 4/19/2023

February 2022
§ 234.15 When an employee's estate is entitled. ( a ) The employee's estate is considered an equitably entitled person if the funds used to pay burial expenses consisted of: ( 1 ) Money in the employee's single-ownership bank account;
( 2 ) Money paid directly to the funeral home by the employee before death;
( 3 ) Money paid by the employee under a contract, plan, system or general practice where no beneficiary was named to receive the money;
( 4 ) Money found among the employee's effects;
( 5 ) Unpaid salary due the employee by the employee's employer;
( 6 ) Money obtained by selling the employee's real or personal property; or
( 7 ) Money from a trust fund.
( b ) If the employee's estate is the equitably entitled person, the Board will pay the LSDP to the legal representative of the employee's estate. When no legal representative of the employee's estate has been or is expected to be appointed, the Board will pay the LSDP according to state statutory procedures applicable when no formal probate or administration occurs.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 840.30

 840.29

 840.27

 840.23

 840.19

 840.14

 840.07

 840.01

 839.96

 839.91

 839.84

 839.70

 839.63

 839.58

 839.51

 839.41

 839.23

 839.14

 839.12

 839.00

 838.90

 838.76

 838.60

 838.46

 838.31

 838.17

 838.02

 837.87

 837.71

 837.56

 49.48

 49.47

 49.44

 49.39

 49.34

 49.27

 49.18

 49.11

 49.04

 48.98

 48.89

 48.71

 48.62

 48.56

 48.47

 48.34

 48.11

 48.00

 47.98

 47.82

 47.70

 47.52

 47.32

 47.14

 46.96

 46.78

 46.60

 46.41

 46.21

 46.03

STORAGE

-0.03

-0.01

-0.03

-0.05

-0.05

-0.07

-0.09

-0.08

-0.06

-0.06

-0.09

-0.18

-0.09

-0.06

-0.09

-0.13

-0.23

-0.11

-0.03

-0.15

-0.13

-0.18

-0.20

-0.18

-0.19

-0.18

-0.19

-0.19

-0.20

-0.19

CHANGE

122

131

127

112

114

107

96

99

98

107

94

45

89

106

96

76

28

87

132

67

78

59

48

56

50

55

48

47

41

47

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

 106

OUTLET

 9

 12

 14

 12

 14

 14

 15

 12

 4

 13

 13

 9

 8

 12

 15

 14

 17

 18

 19

 18

 16

 22

 23

 19

 18

 17

 16

 15

 15

 15

C.F.S.

 .22

 .30

 .35

 .30

 .34

 .35

 .36

 .30

 .09

 .31

 .32

 .23

 .20

 .29

 .37

 .36

 .42

 .44

 .47

 .44

 .41

 .55

 .57

 .47

 .45

 .43

 .40

 .38

 .37

 .38

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JUNE 2017 RUN DATE: 12/06/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -3.52 2,462 3,180 600 438 10.87 .03

ACRE-FEET -3,520 4,883 6,308 1,190 869

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,190

OUTLET

TOTAL

 6,308

 7,498

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .03

JULY 1, 2016 26.46

 49.51

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 26.46
### §6823. Administration

#### (a) Appointment of an Administrator

The Board of Trustees, in consultation with the appropriate officials of the Bank, should appoint an Administrator who should be responsible for managing the day-to-day operations of the Trust Fund.

#### (b) Authority to solicit and accept contributions

The Trust Fund should be authorized to solicit and accept contributions from governments, the private sector, and nongovernmental entities of all kinds.

#### (c) Accountability of funds and criteria for programs

As part of the negotiations described in section 6821(a) of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury shall, consistent with subsection (d)—

(1) take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the Bank or the Association will have in effect adequate procedures and standards to account for and monitor the use of funds contributed to the Trust Fund, including the cost of administering the Trust Fund; and

(2) seek agreement on the criteria that should be used to determine the programs and activities that should be assisted by the Trust Fund.

#### (d) Selection of projects and recipients

The Board of Trustees should establish—

(1) criteria for the selection of projects to receive support from the Trust Fund;

(2) standards and criteria regarding qualifications of recipients of such support;

(3) such rules and procedures as may be necessary for cost-effective management of the Trust Fund; and

(4) such rules and procedures as may be necessary to ensure transparency and accountability in the grant-making process.

#### (e) Transparency of operations

The Board of Trustees should ensure full and prompt public disclosure of the proposed objectives, financial organization, and operations of the Trust Fund.

(Pub. L. 106–264, title I, §123, Aug. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 756.)
AMENDMENT
TO


EXECUTIVE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) dated February 1, 2018, is by and between MGT
Capital Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), and Stephen Schaeffer (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Executive Employment Agreement, dated August 15, 2017 (the “Executive
Employment Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to the terms of the Executive Employment Agreement, the Executive has served as the President of the Company’s
Cryptocurreny Operations from the date of execution of the Executive Employment Agreement; 


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 1.4 (Base Salary and Compensation) and Section 1.5 (Incentive Compensation) of the Executive Employment Agreement,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Executive Employment Agreement as set forth below:


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises of the parties, and other good and valuable consideration,
the undersigned agree as follows:


 


1.
The Executive Employment Agreement shall be amended as follows:




 


	 	 	In
    Section 1.4, the dollar amount “$200,000” shall be replaced with “$250,000.”
	 	 	 
	 	 	In
    Section 1.5(a)(ii), the dollar amount “$200,000” shall be replaced with “$300,000.”


 


2.
Except as herein provided, the terms of the Executive Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.
Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Executive Employment
Agreement.


 


4.
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts (including by facsimile or pdf signature pages or other means of electronic
transmission) each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same
instrument.


 


5.
Should any provision of this Amendment be declared illegal, invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction, then such provision
shall be deemed to be severable from this Amendment as to such jurisdiction (but, to the extent permitted by law, not
elsewhere) and in any event such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remainder hereof.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.


 


	 	 	MGT
    CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.
	EXECUTIVE	 	 	 
	 	 	By:
    	/s/
    H. Robert Holmes
	/s/
    Stephen Schaeffer	 	Name:
    	H.
    Robert Holmes
	Stephen
    Schaeffer	 	Title:
    	Director,
    Chairman of the Nomination and Compensation Committee
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 509

 491

 455

 447

 459

 448

 471

 534

 605

 467

 461

 466

 690

 826

 1,229

 536

 469

 458

 494

 625

 683

 868

 977

 1,175

 1,153

 1,070

 1,043

 1,127

 1,083

 818

 216

 195

 221

 235

 225

 243

 261

 262

 242

 224

 193

 206

 238

 212

 248

 270

 208

 207

 233

 256

 247

 231

 223

 264

 257

 238

 238

 198

 227

 233

 430

 403

 388

 379

 377

 381

 386

 400

 430

 380

 359

 370

 418

 450

 583

 442

 391

 375

 388

 422

 420

 452

 497

 566

 551

 527

 527

 535

 538

 504

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Ventura HERNANDEZ-MARQUINA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-74144.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*212Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Antonio Reyna Salazar, Esq., Salazar Law Offices, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner,

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, WWS-Distriet Counsel, Immigration and Naturalization Service Office Of The District Counsel, Seattle, WA, Norah Ascoli Schwarz, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Ventura Hernandez-Marquina, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal after his attorney conceded that he had voluntarily departed in 1999 and therefore could not establish ten years of continuous physical presence in the United States, as required under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(A). *See Vasquez-Lopez v. Ashcroft,*343 F.3d 961, 974 (9th Cir.2003) (per curiam). Hernandez-Marquina contends that the Board and the immigration judge denied him due process in failing further to consider his application. This contention lacks merit because the burden of proving his eligibility for cancellation of removal was on Hernandez-Marquina. *See Ramirez-Perez v. Ashcroft,*336 F.3d 1001, 1003 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 7,230

 7,460

 6,312

 5,714

 6,411

 6,313

 6,177

 6,028

 6,312

 4,863

 5,359

 5,119

 5,877

 5,747

 5,781

 5,319

 5,790

 5,052

 4,201

 4,717

 4,823

 4,597

 4,281

 4,625

 4,236

 5,011

 4,695

 5,328

 4,422

 3,822

 3,830

 106,899

 108,423

 110,089

 110,581

 110,480

 111,046

 111,491

 111,785

 111,922

 112,323

 111,326

 110,851

 110,172

 110,246

 110,193

 110,176

 109,720

 109,735

 109,047

 107,586

 106,688

 105,935

 105,006

 103,822

 103,025

 101,898

 101,563

 100,945

 100,960

 100,113

 98,738

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 14,784

 29,568

 44,352

 59,136

 73,920

 88,704

 103,488

 118,272

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 1999 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: January 25, 2000

 114,129

 115,883

 116,401

 116,295

 116,891

 117,359

 117,668

 117,813

 118,234

 117,186

 116,685

 115,970

 116,049

 115,993

 115,974

 115,495

 115,510

 114,787

 113,248

 112,303

 111,511

 110,532

 109,287

 108,447

 107,261

 106,909

 106,258

 106,273

 105,382

 103,935

 102,568

 1,285,216

 1,270,432

 1,255,648

 1,240,864

 1,226,080

 1,211,296

 1,196,512

 1,181,728

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,267,000

 3,282,000

 3,296,000

 3,311,000

 3,326,000

 3,341,000

 3,355,000

 3,370,000

 0.0352

 0.0704

 0.1056

 0.1408

 0.1760

 0.2112

 0.2464

 0.2816

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VAL

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 112,526
### **CHAPTER 10—ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME**

Sec.
401.
Definitions.

#### SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF RETIREMENT HOME

411.
Establishment of the Armed Forces Retirement Home.
412.
Residents of Retirement Home.
413.
Services provided to residents.
413a.
Oversight of health care provided to residents.
414.
Fees paid by residents.
415.
Chief Operating Officer.
416.
Advisory Council.
416a.
Resident Advisory Committees.
417.
Administrators, Ombudsmen, and staff of facilities.
418.
Periodic inspection of retirement home facilities.
419.
Armed Forces Retirement Home Trust Fund.
420.
Disposition of effects of deceased persons; unclaimed property.
421.
Payment of residents for services.
422.
Authority to accept certain uncompensated services.
423.
Preservation of historic buildings and grounds at the Armed Forces Retirement Home—Washington.
424.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS

431 to 433. Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

441.
Repealed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 213

 186

 160

 157

 161

 169

 166

 163

 166

 169

 169

 185

 184

 198

 173

 159

 156

 152

 163

 152

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 99

 116

 113

 104

 97

 105

 111

 117

 121

 124

 122

 124

 121

 115

 97

 99

 96

 104

 106

 124

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 143

 154

 139

 131

 133

 136

 137

 137

 137

 139

 140

 146

 150

 156

 146

 132

 129

 130

 133

 136

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER