alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4284 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to issue 

regulations providing examples of a failure to comply in good faith 

with the requirements of prime contractors with respect to subcontracting 

plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. CURBELO of Florida (for himself, Ms. CLARKE of New York, and Mr. 

CHABOT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to issue regulations providing examples of a failure to comply in good faith with the requirements of 

prime contractors with respect to subcontracting plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Service Provider Op5 portunity Clarification Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4284 IH

1 SEC. 2. GOOD FAITH COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIRE2 MENTS OF PRIME CONTRACTORS WITH RE3 SPECT TO SUBCONTRACTING PLANS. 

4 Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Administrator of the Small Business Ad6 ministration shall issue regulations providing examples of 

7 activities that would be considered a failure to make a 

8 good faith effort to comply with the requirements imposed 

9 on an entity (other than a small business concern as de10 fined under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 

11 U.S.C. 632)) that is awarded a prime contract containing 

12 the clauses required under paragraphs (4) or (5) of section 

13 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 637(d)). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of NewPage Holding Corporation



|                                    |  |                                                            
|----------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or
Organization
|                                    | 
|NewPage Corporation                 |  | Delaware                                                   
|                                    | 
|Subsidiaries of NewPage Corporation |  |                                                            
|                                    | 
|Name of Subsidiary                  |  | State or Other Jurisdiction ofIncorporation or
Organization
|                                    | 
|Chillicothe Paper Inc.              |  | Delaware                                                   
|                                    | 
|Escanaba Paper Company              |  | Michigan                                                   
|                                    | 
|Luke Paper Company                  |  | Delaware                                                   
|                                    | 
|NewPage Energy Services LLC         |  | Delaware                                                   
|                                    | 
|Rumford Falls Power Company         |  | Maine                                                      
|                                    | 
|Rumford Cogeneration Inc.           |  | Delaware                                                   
|                                    | 
|Rumford Paper Company               |  | Delaware                                                   
|                                    | 
|Upland Resources Inc.               |  | West Virginia                                              
|                                    | 
|Wickliffe Paper Company LLC         |  | Delaware
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Eddie Junior Woods, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 55548;

First District (5th Division) —

July 13, 1973.

Gerald D. Mindell, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Elmer C. Kissane and Robert J. Cohen, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

Opinion by Mr.

PRESIDING JUSTICE DRUCKER.
§ 802.307 Notice of oral argument. ( a ) In cases where a request for oral argument has been approved or where oral argument has been ordered, the Board shall give all parties a minimum of 30 days' notice, in writing, by mail, of the scope of argument and of the time when, and place where, oral argument will be held.
( b ) Once oral argument has been scheduled by the Board, continuances shall not be granted except for good cause shown by a party, such as in cases of extreme hardship or where attendance of a party or his or her representative is mandated at a previously scheduled judicial proceeding. Unless the ground for the request arises thereafter, requests for continuances must be received by the Board at least 15 days before the scheduled date of oral argument, must be served upon the other parties and must specify good cause why the requesting party cannot be available for oral argument.
( c ) The Board may cancel or reschedule oral argument on its own motion at any time.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Carl Douglas Prater, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 73-228;

Second District

April 30, 1974.

George Pease, Public Defender, of Waukegan (Michael J. Boyd, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel), for appellant.

Jack Hoogasian, State’s Attorney, of Waukegan, for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE T. MORAN.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.93

 130.86

 130.94

 130.94

 130.79

 130.83

 130.94

 130.86

 130.78

 130.89

 130.91

 130.82

 130.63

 130.98

 130.74

 130.73

 130.76

 130.78

 130.78

 130.77

 130.83

 130.82

 130.79

 130.73

 130.69

 130.95

 130.92

 130.85

 130.90

 130.78

 130.82

 682

 674

 683

 683

 666

 670

 683

 674

 665

 677

 679

 669

 648

 688

 660

 659

 663

 665

 665

 664

 670

 669

 666

 659

 655

 684

 680

 673

 678

 665

 669

STORAGE

-7

-8

+9

+0

-17

+4

+13

-9

-9

+12

+2

-10

-21

+40

-28

-1

+4

+2

+0

-1

+6

-1

-3

-7

-4

+29

-4

-7

+5

-13

+4

CHANGE

629

618

600

567

558

577

600

546

523

515

502

483

504

540

492

512

520

523

525

514

497

497

499

477

467

467

434

409

408

392

400

INFLOW

 47

 47

 43

 41

 40

 39

 39

 39

 39

 41

 43

 43

 45

 46

 46

 46

 47

 47

 48

 49

 49

 48

 46

 46

 47

 47

 47

 47

 47

 47

 45

PUTAH

 585

 574

 551

 525

 526

 536

 553

 511

 488

 467

 457

 444

 469

 473

 459

 466

 470

 474

 476

 465

 444

 449

 454

 434

 421

 404

 388

 365

 357

 351

 351

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

C.F.S.

 .41

 .42

 .41

 .24

 .16

 .05

 .27

 .33

 .32

 .31

 .28

 .34

 .30

 .31

 .30

 .33

 .36

 .29

 .29

 .34

 .27

 .28

 .35

 .25

 .41

 .25

 .29

 .27

 .35

 .24

 .47

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 RUN DATE: 09/02/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -20 15,795 14,387 1,391 31 9.49 .02

ACRE-FEET -20 31,329 28,537 2,759 61

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,759

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 28,537

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .02

JULY 1, 2014 .02

 689

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §9530. Exceptions, waiver, and termination

#### (a) Exceptions

The provisions of this part and amendments made by this part shall not apply with respect to the following:

(1) Activities subject to the reporting requirements under title V of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3091 et seq.), or any authorized intelligence activities of the United States.

(2) The admission of an alien to the United States if such admission is necessary to comply with United States obligations under the Agreement between the United Nations and the United States of America regarding the Headquarters of the United Nations, signed at Lake Success June 26, 1947, and entered into force November 21, 1947, under the Convention on Consular Relations, done at Vienna April 24, 1963, and entered into force March 19, 1967, or under other international agreements.

#### (b) Waiver of sanctions that are imposed

Subject to section 9511 of this title, if the President imposes sanctions with respect to a person under this part or the amendments made by this part, the President may waive the application of those sanctions if the President determines that such a waiver is in the national security interest of the United States.

#### (c) Termination

Subject to section 9511 of this title, the President may terminate the application of sanctions under section 9524, 9525, 9526, 9527, or 9528 of this title with respect to a person if the President submits to the appropriate congressional committees—

(1) a notice of and justification for the termination; and

(2) a notice that—

(A) the person is not engaging in the activity that was the basis for the sanctions or has taken significant verifiable steps toward stopping the activity; and

(B) the President has received reliable assurances that the person will not knowingly engage in activity subject to sanctions under this part in the future.

(Pub. L. 115–44, title II, §236, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 921.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This part, referred to in text, is part 2 (§§221–238) of subtitle A of title II of Pub. L. 115–44, which enacted this part and sections 8909 and 8910 of this title and amended sections 8901, 8907, 8908, 8923, 8924 of this title. For complete classification of part 2 to the Code, see Tables.

The National Security Act of 1947, referred to in subsec. (a)(1), is act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, 61 Stat. 495. Title V of the Act is classified generally to subchapter III (§3091 et seq.) of chapter 44 of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.
§ 656.12 Improper commerce and payment. The following provision applies to applications filed under both this part and 20 CFR part 656 in effect prior to March 28, 2005, and to any certification resulting from those applications: ( a ) Applications for permanent labor certification and approved labor certifications are not articles of commerce. They shall not be offered for sale, barter or purchase by individuals or entities. Any evidence that an application for permanent labor certification or an approved labor certification has been sold, bartered, or purchased shall be grounds for investigation under this part and may be grounds for denial under § 656.24, revocation under § 656.32, debarment under § 656.31(f), or any combination thereof.
( b ) An employer must not seek or receive payment of any kind for any activity related to obtaining permanent labor certification, including payment of the employer's attorneys' fees, whether as an incentive or inducement to filing, or as a reimbursement for costs incurred in preparing or filing a permanent labor certification application, except when work to be performed by the alien in connection with the job opportunity would benefit or accrue to the person or entity making the payment, based on that person's or entity's established business relationship with the employer. An alien may pay his or her own costs in connection with a labor certification, including attorneys' fees for representation of the alien, except that where the same attorney represents both the alien and the employer, such costs shall be borne by the employer. For purposes of this paragraph (b), payment includes, but is not limited to, monetary payments; wage concessions, including deductions from wages, salary, or benefits; kickbacks, bribes, or tributes; in kind payments; and free labor.
( c ) Evidence that an employer has sought or received payment from any source in connection with an application for permanent labor certification or an approved labor certification, except for a third party to whose benefit work to be performed in connection with the job opportunity would accrue, based on that person's or entity's established business relationship with the employer, shall be grounds for investigation under this part or any appropriate Government agency's procedures, and may be grounds for denial under § 656.32, revocation under § 656.32, debarment under § 656.31(f), or any combination thereof.
[72 FR 27945, May 17, 2007]
### §9712. Support for efforts at the United Nations on the humanitarian crisis in Venezuela

#### (a) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that the United Nations humanitarian agencies should conduct and publish independent assessments of the humanitarian situation in Venezuela, including—

(1) the extent and impact of the shortages of food, medicine, and medical supplies in Venezuela;

(2) basic health indicators in Venezuela, such as maternal and child mortality rates and the prevalence and treatment of communicable diseases; and

(3) the efforts needed to resolve the shortages identified in paragraph (1) and to improve the health indicators referred to in paragraph (2).

#### (b) United Nations Resident Coordinator

The President should instruct the Permanent Representative to the United Nations to use the voice, vote, and influence of the United States at the United Nations to support the efforts of the Resident Coordinator for Venezuela in a manner that—

(1) contributes to Venezuela's long-term recovery; and

(2) advances humanitarian efforts in Venezuela and for Venezuelans residing in neighboring countries.

(Pub. L. 116–94, div. J, title I, §122, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 3033.)
Exhibit 4.2



360 Finance,   Inc. Number Share(s) Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands Share   capital is US$50,000 divided into (i) 4,900,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares   of a par value of US$0.00001 each, (ii) 50,000,000 Class B Ordinary Shares of   a par value of US$0.00001 each, and (iii) 50,000,000 Shares of a par value of   US$0.00001 each of such class or classes (however designated) as the Board   may determine in accordance with the articles of association of the Company.   THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT the registered holder of subject to the Memorandum   and Articles of Association thereof. is Share(s) in the above-named Company   EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the day of 2018 by: unm IN US.A, 0   GOES 740 All Rights Reserved
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 14, 2006

/s/  Ann F. Massey
---------------------------------------------
Name:    Ann F. Massey
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32.1**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                        |                                                                                                                   |                                |
|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Date:                    September 14, 2007 |                                                                                                                   | /s/                  Howard F. Hill |
|                                        | Howard                    F. Hill                    Chief                      Executive                      Officer |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,570

 3,228

 2,980

 3,996

 4,535

 3,198

 2,964

 3,489

 3,661

 2,509

 3,117

 2,677

 3,442

 3,685

 3,857

 3,744

 3,692

 4,138

 4,382

 3,742

 6,048

 4,327

 3,529

 6,024

 5,309

 3,076

 3,103

 5,309

 4,343

 4,978

 4,199

 70,738

 69,643

 69,227

 68,597

 68,963

 69,823

 69,370

 68,718

 68,596

 68,644

 67,596

 67,177

 66,361

 66,313

 66,498

 66,838

 67,052

 67,207

 67,778

 68,552

 68,679

 70,991

 71,552

 71,327

 73,483

 74,853

 74,032

 73,279

 74,658

 75,051

 76,028

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 14,952

 29,904

 44,856

 59,808

 74,760

 89,712

 104,664

 119,616

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2008 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: January 5, 2009

 73,308

 72,871

 72,207

 72,593

 73,498

 73,021

 72,334

 72,207

 72,257

 71,153

 70,713

 69,854

 69,803

 69,998

 70,355

 70,582

 70,744

 71,345

 72,160

 72,294

 74,727

 75,318

 75,081

 77,351

 78,792

 77,929

 77,135

 78,588

 79,001

 80,029

 80,227

 1,285,048

 1,270,096

 1,255,144

 1,240,192

 1,225,240

 1,210,288

 1,195,336

 1,180,384

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,267,000

 3,282,000

 3,297,000

 3,312,000

 3,327,000

 3,342,000

 3,357,000

 3,372,000

 0.0356

 0.0712

 0.1068

 0.1424

 0.1780

 0.2136

 0.2492

 0.2848

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 74,461
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Unitech Energy Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, James
Durward, in my capacity as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 30, 2005                            /s/ James Durward
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    James Durward
                                                    Principal Accounting Officer
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, William C. Yip, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the 'Managing General
Partner'), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the 'Partnership'),
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
       September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
       on the date hereof (the 'Quarterly Report'), fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Partnership.

/s/ William C. Yip
------------------------------------------------------
William C. Yip
Chief Financial Officer
 of the Managing General Partner
November 13, 2003
§ 667.705 Who is responsible for funds provided under title I of WIA? ( a ) The recipient is responsible for all funds under its grant(s).
( b ) The political jurisdiction(s) of the chief elected official(s) in a local workforce investment area is liable for any misuse of the WIA grant funds allocated to the local area under WIA sections 128 and 133, unless the chief elected official(s) reaches an agreement with the Governor to bear such liability.
( c ) When a local workforce area is composed of more than one unit of general local government, the liability of the individual jurisdictions must be specified in a written agreement between the chief elected officials.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 230

 222

 222

 222

 226

 228

 221

 234

 241

 242

 240

 276

 222

 227

 214

 208

 200

 215

 210

 213

 206

 191

 179

 165

 156

 145

 134

 139

 208

 196

 201

 201

 199

 199

 197

 197

 198

 191

 186

 194

 200

 189

 184

 177

 175

 175

 177

 180

 171

 160

 154

 151

 135

 126

 118

 127

 218

 211

 213

 212

 213

 211

 207

 210

 212

 211

 205

 212

 210

 207

 202

 194

 190

 191

 194

 193

 184

 170

 166

 155

 145

 134

 126

 133

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 11, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER