alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6198

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL ANTHONY CHERRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00040-RLV-DSC-1; 5:10-cv00103-RLV)

Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 27, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Anthony Cherry, Appellant Pro Se. Steven R. Kaufman, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Cherry seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Cherry has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,259

 704

 2,533

 1,229

 1,382

 2,954

 2,092

 2,843

 2,982

 1,833

 2,258

 1,803

 2,247

 2,607

 2,642

 1,997

 2,216

 3,347

 2,904

 2,815

 2,240

 1,255

 3,141

 1,708

 1,869

 1,698

 3,838

 2,406

 2,796

 1,942

 3,789

 45,874

 45,727

 44,109

 44,310

 43,262

 42,412

 43,098

 42,930

 43,485

 44,143

 43,677

 43,639

 43,170

 43,146

 43,465

 43,802

 43,509

 43,439

 44,446

 44,983

 45,408

 45,265

 44,194

 44,969

 44,343

 43,901

 43,319

 44,799

 44,845

 45,259

 44,841

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2021 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: September 16, 2021

 48,133

 46,431

 46,642

 45,539

 44,644

 45,366

 45,190

 45,773

 46,467

 45,976

 45,935

 45,442

 45,417

 45,753

 46,107

 45,799

 45,725

 46,786

 47,350

 47,798

 47,648

 46,520

 47,335

 46,677

 46,212

 45,599

 47,157

 47,205

 47,641

 47,201

 48,630

 5,831,000

 5,809,000

 5,788,000

 5,767,000

 5,745,000

 5,724,000

 5,703,000

 5,682,000

 5,660,000

 5,639,000

 5,618,000

 5,596,000

 5,575,000

 5,554,000

 5,532,000

 5,511,000

 5,490,000

 5,468,000

 5,447,000

 5,426,000

 5,404,000

 5,383,000

 5,362,000

 5,341,000

 5,319,000

 5,298,000

 5,277,000

 5,255,000

 5,234,000

 5,213,000

 5,191,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 48,289
### §8131. Protection of confidentiality of information

Information reported to, or otherwise acquired by, the United States Government under this chapter or under the Additional Protocol shall be exempt from disclosure under section 552 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 109–401, title II, §231, Dec. 18, 2006, 120 Stat. 2747.)
#### § 670.530 Are Job Corps centers required to maintain a student accountability system?

Yes, each Job Corps center must establish and operate an effective system to account for and document the whereabouts, participation, and status of students during their Job Corps enrollment. The system must enable center staff to detect and respond to instances of unauthorized or unexplained student absence. Each center must operate its student accountability system according to requirements and procedures issued by the Secretary.
June 29 , 2015

Mr. Mike Harvey

1591 Tank Farm Road

Glenrock, WY 82637

Dear Mr. Harvey :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to proces s your request for an exemption. It

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do i n the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your March 13 , 2015

, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

- 2015

-

0645 ), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does

no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request

any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at le ast equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the informat ion described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you wi thin 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 543.56

 543.56

 543.56

 543.56

 543.55

 543.54

 543.51

 543.50

 543.47

 543.46

 543.45

 543.44

 543.40

 543.39

 543.38

 543.38

 543.37

 543.36

 543.35

 543.33

 543.33

 543.30

 543.29

 543.27

 543.26

 543.25

 543.22

 543.19

 543.15

 542.88

 2,034,956

 2,034,956

 2,034,956

 2,034,956

 2,034,828

 2,034,701

 2,034,320

 2,034,192

 2,033,811

 2,033,684

 2,033,556

 2,033,429

 2,032,920

 2,032,793

 2,032,666

 2,032,666

 2,032,539

 2,032,412

 2,032,285

 2,032,030

 2,032,030

 2,031,649

 2,031,522

 2,031,267

 2,031,140

 2,031,013

 2,030,632

 2,030,250

 2,029,742

 2,026,311

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

-128

-127

-381

-128

-381

-127

-128

-127

-509

-127

-127

+0

-127

-127

-127

-255

+0

-381

-127

-255

-127

-127

-381

-382

-508

-3,431

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,592

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 13

 12

 9

 8

 10

 1

 1

 5

 6

 10

 10

 8

 9

 10

 10

 21

 91

 92

 53

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+0

+0

+0

+0

-65

-63

-192

-64

-191

-63

-64

-51

-245

-55

-56

+10

-64

-63

-59

-123

+10

-183

-56

-119

-54

-54

-171

-101

-164

-85

OR

 91

 115

 62

 132

 103

 132

 144

 70

 49

 115

 115

 95

 123

 62

 82

 123

 95

 144

 115

 115

 107

 132

 62

 181

 86

 123

 144

 144

 164

 169

C.F.S.

 .22

 .28

 .15

 .32

 .25

 .32

 .35

 .17

 .12

 .28

 .28

 .23

 .30

 .15

 .20

 .30

 .23

 .35

 .28

 .28

 .26

 .32

 .15

 .44

 .21

 .30

 .35

 .35

 .40

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR June 2, 2011

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2011 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -8,645 0 1,592 385 0 -2,385 3,394 8.25 .05

ACRE-FEET -8,645 0 3,158 764 0 -4,731 6,732

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 3,158

PACHECO TUNNEL 764 TOTAL 3,922

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = 10.47

 2,034,956

SPILL 0 .05

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.
GENERAL 

EXAS 

Honorable J. D, Crow 

County Attorney 

.Hemphill County 

Box 216 

Canadian, Texas 79014 

Opinion No. C-616 

Ret Authority of county attorney 

to bring removal proceedings 

against the city attorney of 

Dear Mr. Crow: a general law city. 

You have requested our opinion concerning your au-. 

thority to bring removal proceedings against a city attorney 

of a city incorporated under the general laws of the State 

of Texas. 

Article 1006, Vernon's Civil Statutes, applicable to 

general law cities, provides as follows: 

"The city council shall have power to 

remove any officer for incompetency, corruption, misconduct or malfeasance in office, after due notice and an opportunity 

to be heard in his defense. The city council shall also have power at any time to 

remove any officer of the corporation elected by them, by resolution declaratory of its 

want of confidence in said officer; provided 

that two-thirds of the aldermen elected vote 

in favor of said resolution." 

In Attorney General's Opinion m-1398 (1962), it was 

held that it was not the duty of the county attorney or distrlct attorney to institute a suit for removal of an official 

of the governing body of a city incorporated under the general 

laws of Texas, We are not aware of any constitutional or statutory provision authorizing either the county attorney, district 

attorney or Attorney General to bring removal proceedings against 

an official of a city incorporated under the general laws of the 

State of Texas. Therefore, it is our opinion that the provisiosns 

-2992- 
Hon. J. D. Crow, page 2 (C-616) 

of Article 1006, Vernon's Civil Statutes, is the exclusive 

removal statute for city officials of general law cities. 

You are therefore advised that you do not have authority to bring removal proceedings against a city attorney of 

a general law city. For a discussion of the powers of the 

county attorney and Attorney General to institute ouster proceedings, see Garcia v. Laughlin, 1 5 Tex. 261, 28 

;z; (1956), and State v. .Harney, 16 2 .? 

S.W.2d 

S.W.2d 55 (19 2), error 

., w.0.m. 

In view of our answer, we are not authorized to advise you as to whether a city attorney appointed pursuant 

to the provisions of Article 977, Vernon's Civil Statutes, 

is an officer within the meaning of Article 988, Vernon's 

Civil~Statutes, nor other related questions, in view of the 

provisions of Article 4399, Vernon's Civil Statutes. 

SUMMARY 

A county attorney is not authorized to bring 

ouster proceedings against a city attorney of 

a city incorporated under the general laws of 

the State of Texas. 

Very truly yours, 

WAGGONER CARR 

Attorney General 

Assistant 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Malcolm Quick 

Phillip Crawford 

Gordon Houser 

Pat Bailey 

APPROVED FOR TBE ATTORREY GENERAL 

By: T. B Wright 

-2993-
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4367 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4367

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to end the increased 
    Federal funding for Medicaid expansion with respect to inmates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 12, 2016

  Mr. Pitts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to end the increased 
    Federal funding for Medicaid expansion with respect to inmates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATING PPACA ENHANCED MEDICAID FMAP FOR PRISONERS.

    Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (y)(2)(A), by adding at the end the 
        following: ``For items and services furnished on or after 
        January 1, 2020, such term does not include an individual 
        described in such subparagraph during the period in which the 
        individual is an inmate in a public institution and is a 
        patient in a medical institution.''; and
            (2) in subsection (z)(2)(A), by adding at the end the 
        following: ``For calendar quarters beginning on or after 
        January 1, 2020, the preceding sentence shall not apply with 
        respect to medical assistance for individuals who are inmates 
        in a public institution and patients in a medical 
        institution.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31



                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWALT, Inc.,
Alternative Loan Trust 2005-25T1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 27, 2006


                                    /s/ Steve Bailey
                                    ---------------------------------
                                    Steve Bailey
                                    Senior Managing Director
### §1642b. Claims against United States; jurisdiction; limitation; preference; reserve fund

No judicial relief or remedy shall be available to any person asserting a claim against the United States or any officer or agent thereof with respect to any action taken under this subchapter, or any other claim for or on account of the property or proceeds described in section 1642a of this title, or for any other action taken with respect thereto except to the extent that the action complained of constitutes a taking of private property without just compensation, and to such extent the sole judicial relief and remedy available shall be an action brought against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims which action must be brought within one year of August 8, 1958, or it shall be forever barred; and any action so brought shall receive a preference over all actions which themselves are not given preference by statute. No other court shall have original jurisdiction to consider any such claim by mandamus or otherwise. If any action is brought pursuant to this section the Secretary of the Treasury shall set aside an appropriate reserve in the account containing the moneys held pursuant to subsection (a) of section 1642a of this title. Such reserve shall be retained pending a final determination of all issues raised in the action and recovery in any such action shall be limited to and paid out of the moneys so reserved. After a final determination of all issues raised in the action and payment of any judgment against the United States entered pursuant thereto, any balance no longer required to be held in reserve shall be disposed of in accordance with the provisions of subsection (d) of section 1642a of this title. Nothing in this section shall be construed to create (1) any liability against the United States for any action taken pursuant to section 1642c of this title, (2) any liability against the United States in favor of the Government of Czechoslovakia, any agency or instrumentality thereof or any person who is an assignee or successor in interest thereto, or (3) any other liability against the United States.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title IV, §403, as added Pub. L. 85–604, §1, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 528; amended Pub. L. 97–164, title I, §161(3), Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 49; Pub. L. 102–572, title IX, §902(b)(1), Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4516.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1992—Pub. L. 102–572 substituted "United States Court of Federal Claims" for "United States Claims Court".

1982—Pub. L. 97–164 substituted "Claims Court" for "Court of Claims".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1992 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 102–572 effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 of Pub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.

#### Effective Date of 1982 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 97–164 effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 402 of Pub. L. 97–164, set out as a note under section 171 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
### subpart i—general provisions
#### § 718.4 Definitions and use of terms.

Except as is otherwise provided by this part, the definitions and usages of terms contained in § 725.101 of subpart A of part 725 of this title shall be applicable to this part.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 129.97

 130.14

 130.15

 130.22

 130.68

 130.59

 130.41

 130.34

 130.54

 130.50

 130.13

 130.50

 130.57

 130.56

 130.35

 130.60

 129.86

 130.49

 130.90

 131.09

 131.04

 130.94

 130.53

 130.29

 130.46

 130.45

 130.58

 130.45

 130.72

 130.88

 130.44

 578

 595

 596

 603

 654

 643

 624

 616

 637

 633

 594

 633

 641

 640

 618

 644

 566

 632

 678

 701

 695

 683

 636

 611

 629

 628

 642

 628

 658

 676

 627

STORAGE

-13

+17

+1

+7

+51

-11

-19

-8

+21

-4

-39

+39

+8

-1

-22

+26

-78

+66

+46

+23

-6

-12

-47

-25

+18

-1

+14

-14

+30

+18

-49

CHANGE

429

466

486

526

517

426

389

384

377

312

253

285

293

324

330

361

310

397

657

754

759

744

717

689

686

637

609

577

536

505

497

INFLOW

 44

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 63

 70

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 327

 443

 461

 458

 448

 378

 341

 278

 208

 183

 88

 43

 43

PUTAH

 391

 413

 441

 478

 448

 388

 355

 344

 303

 243

 229

 221

 245

 281

 297

 304

 305

 321

 307

 299

 300

 291

 291

 323

 335

 359

 393

 400

 432

 452

 478

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .17

 .23

 .25

 .23

 .08

 .15

 .18

 .22

 .05

 .18

 .18

 .24

 .24

 .28

 .30

 .14

 .28

 .06

 .04

 .10

 .29

 .32

 .39

 .35

 .37

 .32

 .32

 .31

 .25

 .19

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .33

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .70

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .07

 .60

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MAY 2005 RUN DATE: 10/26/2005

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +36 15,232 10,667 4,521 27 7.01 1.90

ACRE-FEET +36 30,213 21,158 8,967 54

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 8,967

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 21,158

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.90

JULY 1, 2004 30.49

 591

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK