alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
94°32' 94°31' 94°30' 94°29' 94°28' 

39°00' 

39°01' 

39°02' 

39°03' 

39°04' 

39°05' 

39°06' 

39°07' 

39°08' 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Prepared in cooperation with the 

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2006–5089

Blue Parkway gage, stage elevation of 752 feet—PLATE 4.2

Kelly, B.P., Rydlund, P.H., Jr., 2006

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

By

Brian P. Kelly and Paul H. Rydlund, Jr.

2006

* #

* #

* #

* #

* #

A B C D E F 

13 

12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003 

 and City of Kansas City, Missouri, digital data, 1:833, 2004

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

I - 435 

I-435 

Hawthorne Road 

 Trafficway 

Clary Boulevard 

I-70 

23rd Street 

U S Highway 40 

17th Street 

Road I - 435 

R

a

yto

wn

Coal Mine Road

Van Brunt 

Boulevard

Avenue 

Hard

esty

63rd Steet Brighton

L

ewis

R

oad

67th

Street

Manchester

Gregory Boulevard

Drive Crest

A

venue

EXPLANATION

WATER DEPTH, IN FEET, AT STAGE ELEVATION 

 OF 752 FEET AT BLUE PARKWAY GAGE 

 >, greater than

 0 to 1

 >1 to 2

 >2 to 5

 >5 to 10

 >10

LAND SURFACE BELOW RIVER STAGE

 (levee protected or unconnected to river)

STUDY AREA

GAGE OR FLOOD-FORECAST LOCATION

 (ALERT, Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time)

# *

BLUE RIVER FLOOD INUNDATION

FORECAST LOCATION STAGE STAGE ELEVATION 

12TH STREET 23.5 737.9

HIGHWAY 40 19.4 741.1

STADIUM DRIVE 24.4 742.7

BLUE PARKWAY 29.5 752.0 

63RD STREET 44.0 765.8 

0 0.5 1 KILOMETER 

0 0.5 1 MILE 

U.S. Geological Survey 

stage gage at 12th Street 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at Blue Parkway 

National Weather Service

flood-forecast location 

at Highway 40

U.S. Geological Survey streamflow 

gage at Stadium Drive 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at 63rd Street
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.536 The third attestation element for locations in Alaska: No intention or design to influence bargaining representative election. ( a ) The employer shall attest that use of alien crewmembers to perform the longshore activity specified on the Form ETA 9033-A is not intended or designed to influence an election of a bargaining representative for workers in the State of Alaska.
( b ) *Documentation.* The employer need not develop nor maintain documentation to substantiate the statement referenced in paragraph (a) of this section. In the case of an investigation, however, the employer has the burden of proof to show that the use of alien crewmembers to perform the longshore activity specified on the Form ETA 9033-A was not intended nor designed to influence an election of a bargaining representative for workers in the State of Alaska.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(c)

                                 PROMISSORY NOTE

$125,000.00                                                      March 3, 1999
                                                          San Diego, California

1.    FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned maker promises to pay Alliance 
Pharmaceutical Corp. ("Alliance"), at 3040 Science Park Road, San Diego, 
California, the principal sum of One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars 
($125,000) with interest on the unpaid principal at the rate of seven and 
three-quarters percent (7.75%) per annum during the time such principal 
remains outstanding.

2.    Provided maker remains employed with Alliance, on each of March 15, 
2000 and March 15, 2001, Alliance shall forgive $41,000 of outstanding 
principal and all accrued interest under this Note, and all remaining 
principal and accrued interest shall be forgiven on March 15, 2002. 
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event the undersigned's employment with 
Alliance is terminated for any reason, the entire outstanding balance of 
principal and interest at the time of termination shall be paid in full 
within ninety (90) days of such termination. Maker hereby authorizes Alliance 
to deduct any payments on this Note, scheduled or otherwise, from maker's 
earnings from Alliance at any time.

3.    This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without 
penalty or premium, provided that each such prepayment shall be applied first 
to accrued interest.

4.    Maker's spouse hereby acknowledges that she will benefit from the 
proceeds of this loan, and agrees to the terms of this Note.

5.    The maker of this Note and maker's spouse hereby waive presentment, 
demand, protest or notice of any kind, and agree to reimburse Alliance for 
any costs or expenses of collection or enforcement (including attorney's 
fees) of this Note.

6.    Maker and maker's spouse hereby agree to execute and deliver a deed of 
trust on any real property of maker, including maker's residence, granting a 
lien on such property to secure the repayment of this Note at any time.

7.    This Note shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws
of the State of California.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Note to be duly 
executed and delivered as of the date set forth above.

                                            Maker's Spouse


/s/ DR. ARTEMIOS B. VASSOS                  /s/ KATHLEEN FRAZIER             
-----------------------------------         ---------------------------------
Dr. Artemios B. Vassos                      Kathleen Frazier
§ 702.406 Change of physicians; non-emergencies. ( a ) Whenever the employee has made his initial, free choice of an attending physician, he may not thereafter change physicians without the prior written consent of the employer (or carrier) or the district director. Such consent shall be given in cases where an employee's initial choice was not of a specialist whose services are necessary for, and appropriate to, the proper care and treatment of the compensable injury or disease. In all other cases, consent may be given upon a showing of good cause for change.
( b ) The district director for the appropriate compensation district may order a change of physicians or hospitals when such a change is found to be necessary or desirable or where the fees charged exceed those prevailing within the community for the same or similar services or exceed the provider's customary charges.
[38 FR 26861, Sept. 26, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 402, Jan. 3, 1985]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.34

 129.82

 129.80

 129.83

 129.66

 129.47

 129.67

 129.93

 130.25

 130.13

 129.70

 129.41

 130.05

 130.70

 130.22

 130.27

 130.06

 130.50

 130.15

 129.74

 129.82

 130.10

 130.18

 130.31

 130.57

 129.80

 130.08

 130.78

 130.39

 129.75

 129.24

 616

 562

 560

 563

 547

 528

 548

 573

 607

 594

 551

 523

 586

 656

 603

 609

 587

 633

 596

 555

 562

 591

 599

 613

 641

 560

 589

 665

 622

 556

 507

STORAGE

+17

-54

-2

+3

-16

-19

+20

+25

+34

-13

-43

-28

+63

+70

-53

+6

-22

+46

-37

-41

+7

+29

+8

+14

+28

-81

+29

+76

-43

-66

-49

CHANGE

126

98

119

120

122

145

215

254

291

286

268

234

225

340

186

267

232

173

132

130

148

157

153

153

156

103

272

259

120

104

117

INFLOW

 33

 33

 33

 33

 33

 35

 38

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 39

 204

 119

 168

 157

 70

 70

 67

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 65

 176

 141

 65

 65

 65

PUTAH

 84

 91

 86

 85

 96

 119

 166

 201

 234

 253

 250

 209

 153

 101

 94

 96

 86

 80

 80

 84

 79

 77

 83

 80

 77

 79

 80

 80

 76

 72

 77

PUTAH

 0

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .09

 .15

 .17

 .12

 .18

 .26

 .29

 .24

 .15

 .15

 .17

 .14

 .15

 .07

 .01

 .09

 .07

 .09

 .19

 .10

 .10

 .12

 .23

 .14

 .00

 .08

 .15

 .07

 .16

 .08

 .11

INCHES

 .15

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .34

 1.42

 .51

 .08

 .76

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.41

 .04

 .10

 1.46

 .01

 .02

 .11

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2012 RUN DATE: 05/03/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -92 5,705 3,508 2,229 15 4.12 6.50

ACRE-FEET -92 11,316 6,958 4,421 30

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 4,421

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 6,958

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 6.50

JULY 1, 2011 15.42

 599

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 556 489 516

2 504 452 486

3 521 466 494

4 550 485 525

5 557 492 522

6 522 467 498

7 505 442 468

8 502 447 483

9 512 468 483

10 593 520 554

11 605 546 586

12 569 546 554

13 550 520 529

14 522 446 487

15 497 470 482

16 484 461 470

17 591 464 542

18 617 588 599

19 617 540 567

20 536 468 490

21 482 458 472

22 482 454 472

23 495 453 474

24 512 456 487

25 542 496 525

26 525 477 501

27 508 448 474

28 505 452 476

29 536 454 482

30 530 494 504

31 498 484 492

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Delta Mendota Canal At Check 13 O'Neill

Period: May 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
§ 667.645 What procedures apply to the appeals of non-designation of local areas? ( a ) A unit or combination of units of general local government or rural concentrated employment program grant recipient (as described in WIA section 116(a)(2)(B)) whose appeal of the denial of a request for automatic or temporary and subsequent designation as a local workforce investment area to the State Board has not resulted in designation may appeal the denial of local area designation to the Secretary.
( b ) Appeals made under paragraph (a) of this section must be filed no later than 30 days after receipt of written notification of the denial from the State Board, and must be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the State Board.
( c ) The appellant must establish that it was not accorded procedural rights under the appeal process set forth in the State Plan, or establish that it meets the requirements for designation in WIA section 116(a)(2) or (a)(3). The Secretary may consider any comments submitted in response by the State Board.
( d ) If the Secretary determines that the appellant has met its burden of establishing that it was not accorded procedural rights under the appeal process set forth in the State Plan, or that it meets the requirements for designation in WIA section 116(a)(2) or (a)(3), the Secretary may require that the area be designated as a local workforce investment area.
( e ) The Secretary must issue a written decision to the Governor and the appellant.
#### § 663.110 What are the eligibility criteria for core services for adults in the adult and dislocated worker programs?

To be eligible to receive core services as an adult in the adult and dislocated worker programs, an individual must be 18 years of age or older. To be eligible for the dislocated worker programs, an eligible adult must meet the criteria of § 663.115. Eligibility criteria for intensive and training services are found at §§ 663.220 and 663.310.
### §290h–6. Government corporation control provisions applicable

The Foundation shall be subject to the provisions of chapter 91 of title 31 applicable to wholly owned Government corporations.

(Pub. L. 96–533, title V, §508, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3155.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

"The provisions of chapter 91 of title 31 applicable to wholly owned Government corporations" substituted in text for "title I of the Government Corporation Control Act [31 U.S.C. 846 et seq.]" on authority of Pub. L. 97–258, §4(b), Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 1067, the first section of which enacted Title 31, Money and Finance.
§ 678.730 What is the State one-stop infrastructure funding mechanism? ( a ) Consistent with sec. 121(h)(1)(A)(i)(II) of WIOA, if the Local WDB, chief elected official, and one-stop partners in a local area do not reach consensus agreement on methods of sufficiently funding the costs of infrastructure of one-stop centers for a program year, the State funding mechanism is applicable to the local area for that program year.
( b ) In the State funding mechanism, the Governor, subject to the limitations in paragraph (c) of this section, determines one-stop partner contributions after consultation with the chief elected officials, Local WDBs, and the State WDB. This determination involves: ( 1 ) The application of a budget for one-stop infrastructure costs as described in § 678.735, based on either agreement reached in the local area negotiations or the State WDB formula outlined in § 678.745;
( 2 ) The determination of each local one-stop partner program's proportionate use of the one-stop delivery system and relative benefit received, consistent with the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR part 200, including the Federal cost principles, the partner programs' authorizing laws and regulations, and other applicable legal requirements described in § 678.736; and
( 3 ) The calculation of required statewide program caps on contributions to infrastructure costs from one-stop partner programs in areas operating under the State funding mechanism as described in § 678.738.
( c ) In certain situations, the Governor does not determine the infrastructure cost contributions for some one-stop partner programs under the State funding mechanism. ( 1 ) The Governor will not determine the contribution amounts for infrastructure funds for Native American program grantees described in part 684 of this chapter. The appropriate portion of funds to be provided by Native American program grantees to pay for one-stop infrastructure must be determined as part of the development of the MOU described in § 678.500 and specified in that MOU.
( 2 ) In States in which the policy-making authority is placed in an entity or official that is independent of the authority of the Governor with respect to the funds provided for adult education and literacy activities authorized under title II of WIOA, postsecondary career and technical education activities authorized under the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006, or VR services authorized under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (other than sec. 112 or part C), as amended by WIOA title IV, the determination of the amount each of the applicable partners must contribute to assist in paying the infrastructure costs of one-stop centers must be made by the official or chief officer of the entity with such authority, in consultation with the Governor.
( d ) Any duty, ability, choice, responsibility, or other action otherwise related to the determination of infrastructure costs contributions that is assigned to the Governor in §§ 678.730 through 678.745 also applies to this decision-making process performed by the official or chief officer described in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 428.61

 429.28

 429.83

 430.25

 430.82

 431.34

 431.76

 432.40

 432.62

 432.52

 433.80

 434.52

 434.60

 435.08

 436.07

 436.91

 437.58

 439.40

 440.18

 441.17

 442.03

 443.18

 443.86

 444.57

 445.77

 446.28

 446.70

 448.26

 449.38

 449.21

 768,172

 774,315

 779,369

 783,237

 788,496

 793,304

 797,195

 803,137

 805,183

 804,253

 816,187

 822,926

 823,676

 828,180

 837,497

 845,430

 851,776

 869,095

 876,553

 886,051

 894,329

 905,440

 912,031

 918,931

 930,631

 935,619

 939,733

 955,068

 966,128

 964,447

STORAGE

+4,116

+6,143

+5,054

+3,868

+5,259

+4,808

+3,891

+5,942

+2,046

-930

+11,934

+6,739

+750

+4,504

+9,317

+7,933

+6,346

+17,319

+7,458

+9,498

+8,278

+11,111

+6,591

+6,900

+11,700

+4,988

+4,114

+15,335

+11,060

-1,681

CHANGE

3,262

3,255

2,710

2,180

2,993

4,400

3,576

3,120

2,075

814

6,226

3,370

1,170

2,430

5,117

6,381

6,032

9,078

5,562

4,984

4,835

6,100

3,857

3,250

6,556

2,975

5,144

8,056

5,785

803

PUMPING

 854

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,730

 1,514

 0

 870

 1,084

 0

 0

 436

 0

 293

 1,757

 2,636

 0

 1,478

 0

 149

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,560

 0

 0

 1,527

POWER

 137

 146

 152

 149

 164

 138

 146

 149

 121

 120

 113

 105

 102

 103

 145

 232

 245

 137

 267

 241

 252

 248

 245

 222

 215

 200

 220

 211

 188

 151

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-197

-12

-10

-81

-177

-108

+46

+25

-52

-78

-96

+132

-254

-56

+19

-392

+48

-210

-57

+45

-261

-250

-290

+451

-442

-260

-290

-114

-22

+27

OR

 36

 33

 30

 42

 60

 69

 45

 45

 45

 39

 12

 40

 21

 27

 24

 21

 18

 9

 16

 34

 28

 0

 0

 0

 79

 38

 22

 16

 3

 6

C.F.S.

 .12

 .11

 .10

 .14

 .20

 .23

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .13

 .04

 .13

 .07

 .09

 .08

 .07

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .11

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .12

 .07

 .05

 .01

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .01

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .05

 .30

 .39

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .43

 .19

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR December 20, 2001

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2001 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +200,391 126,096 16,888 5,264 0 -2,916 858 2.82 1.97

ACRE-FEET +200,391 250,111 33,497 10,441 0 -5,784 1,702

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 33,497

PACHECO TUNNEL 10,441 TOTAL 43,938

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = 2.16

 764,056

SPILL 0 1.97

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.
June 24, 2015 

Mr. John Massey 

5080 Batavia Road 

Cincinnati, OH 45244 

Dear Mr. Massey: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 5, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2133), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply 

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 31.1



FORM 10-KSB CERTIFICATION





I, David R. Koos, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this  Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 of Frezer, Inc.





2.

Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does not  contain  any untrue statement of material  fact or omit to state a material  fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of Frezer Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

I  am  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure controls  and  procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(e)  and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for Frezer Inc. and have:



A.

Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that material  information  relating to  Frezer Inc.,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



B.

Designed such internal controls over financial  reporting to provide reasonable  assurance  regarding the reliability of financial  reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





C.

Evaluated  the   effectiveness  of  Frezer, Inc.'s disclosure  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



D.

Disclosed in this report any change in  Frezer, Inc. s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during Frezer Inc.s  most  recent  fiscal  quarter  that has  materially  affected or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  Frezer, inc.s internal control over financial reporting.





5.

I have  disclosed,  based on my most recent  evaluation  of internal control over financial  reporting,  to  Frezer, Inc.s auditors and  Frezer Inc.s board of directors:



A.

All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  Frezer Inc.s  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





B.

Any fraud, whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or other  employees who have a significant  role in  Frezer, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   March 30, 2006

/s/ DAVID  R. KOOS





David R. Koos

President & Chief Executive Officer