alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 183 (Wednesday, September 22, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 56801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21336]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Date: Weeks of September 20, 27, October 4, 11, 18, 25, 2004.

Place:  Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, Maryland.

Status: Public and closed.

Matters To Be Considered: 

Week of September 20, 2004

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of September 20, 2004.

Week of September 27, 2004--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of September 27, 2004.

Week of October 4, 2004--Tentative

Thursday, October 7, 2004

10:30 a.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed--Ex. 1).
1 p.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed--Ex. 1).

Week of October 11, 2004--Tentative

Wednesday, October 13, 2004

9:30 a.m. Briefing on Decommissioning Activities and Status (Public 
Meeting) (Contact: Claudia Craig, (301) 415-7276).

    This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address--http://www.nrc.gov.
1:30 p.m. Discussion of Intragovernmental Issues (Closed--Ex. 1 & 9).

Week of October 18, 2004--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of October 18, 2004.

Week of October 25, 2004--Tentative

    There are no meetings scheduled for the week of October 25, 2004.

    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on 
short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--
(301) 415-1292. Contact person for more information: Dave Gamberoni, 
(301) 415-1651.

* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, August Spector, at (301) 415-7080, TDD: (301) 415-
2100, or by e-mail at [email protected]. Determinations on requests for 
reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301) 415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to [email protected].

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
Dave Gamberoni,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 04-21336 Filed 9-20-04; 9:34 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,025.49

 1,025.22

 1,025.04

 1,024.94

 1,024.73

 1,024.46

 1,024.36

 1,024.26

 1,024.25

 1,024.17

 1,024.14

 1,023.97

 1,023.80

 1,023.63

 1,023.43

 1,023.14

 1,022.84

 1,022.53

 1,022.31

 1,022.08

 1,021.93

 1,021.58

 1,021.24

 1,020.96

 1,020.81

 1,020.57

 1,020.13

 1,019.91

 1,019.88

 1,019.64

 1,019.34

 3,420.8

 3,414.1

 3,409.6

 3,407.2

 3,402.0

 3,395.4

 3,392.9

 3,390.5

 3,390.2

 3,388.2

 3,387.5

 3,383.3

 3,379.2

 3,375.0

 3,370.1

 3,363.0

 3,355.7

 3,348.2

 3,342.8

 3,337.2

 3,333.6

 3,325.1

 3,316.8

 3,310.1

 3,306.4

 3,300.7

 3,290.1

 3,284.8

 3,284.0

 3,278.3

 3,271.0

STORAGE

-4.7

-6.7

-4.4

-2.5

-5.2

-6.6

-2.5

-2.5

-0.2

-2.0

-0.7

-4.2

-4.2

-4.2

-4.9

-7.1

-7.3

-7.5

-5.4

-5.6

-3.6

-8.5

-8.2

-6.8

-3.6

-5.8

-10.6

-5.3

-0.7

-5.8

-7.2

CHANGE

 4,158

 2,301

 2,589

 3,276

 2,476

 2,603

 4,399

 3,476

 4,607

 3,922

 4,369

 2,430

 2,593

 4,636

 3,859

 4,716

 4,947

 6,930

 7,790

 6,037

 3,404

 2,048

 2,695

 3,434

 4,154

 4,248

 1,725

 3,710

 4,797

 3,749

 2,303

INFLOW

 6,511

 5,534

 4,709

 4,410

 4,963

 5,763

 5,494

 4,607

 4,572

 4,704

 4,625

 4,392

 4,589

 6,625

 6,203

 8,186

 8,608

 10,627

 10,447

 8,788

 5,169

 6,222

 6,719

 6,666

 5,870

 7,050

 6,922

 6,219

 5,055

 6,555

 5,851

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 15

 131

 123

 109

 116

 188

 145

 109

 159

 210

 116

 144

 101

 108

 123

 108

 29

 108

 43

 72

 72

 100

 128

 185

 107

 114

 149

 163

 106

 106

 92

C.F.S.

 .02

 .18

 .17

 .15

 .16

 .26

 .20

 .15

 .22

 .29

 .16

 .20

 .14

 .15

 .17

 .15

 .04

 .15

 .06

 .10

 .10

 .14

 .18

 .26

 .15

 .16

 .21

 .23

 .15

 .15

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .00

 .13

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2019 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 20, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -154.5 118,381 192,655 0 0 3,579 4.98 .25

ACRE-FEET -154,500 234,809 382,131 0 0 7,099

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 382,131

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 382,131

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .25

JULY 1, 2019 1.59

 3,425.5

Table 3

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = .25
Exhibit 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Chesapeake Funding LLC on Form S-3 of our report dated January 29, 2003 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to Chesapeake Funding LLC if it had been operated as an unaffiliated entity)
appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chesapeake Funding LLC for the
year ended December 31, 2002, and to the use of such report dated January 29,
2003, incorporated by reference in the Prospectus, which is a part of this
Registration Statement.

We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement of D.L. Peterson Trust
on Form S-1 of our report dated January 29, 2003 (which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to D.L Peterson Trust if
it had been operated as an unaffiliated entity) appearing in the Prospectus,
which is a part of this Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectus.




/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
September 22, 2003
### §8421. Purposes of assistance

The purposes of assistance under this subchapter are—

(1) to support Pakistan's paramount national security need to fight and win the ongoing counterinsurgency within its borders in accordance with its national security interests;

(2) to work with the Government of Pakistan to improve Pakistan's border security and control and help prevent any Pakistani territory from being used as a base or conduit for terrorist attacks in Pakistan, or elsewhere;

(3) to work in close cooperation with the Government of Pakistan to coordinate action against extremist and terrorist targets; and

(4) to help strengthen the institutions of democratic governance and promote control of military institutions by a democratically elected civilian government.

(Pub. L. 111–73, title II, §201, Oct. 15, 2009, 123 Stat. 2069.)
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-055;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.00

 129.33

 129.31

 129.58

 129.89

 130.24

 130.54

 130.78

 130.54

 130.27

 129.99

 129.49

 128.96

 129.55

 129.73

 129.67

 129.64

 129.75

 129.77

 129.54

 129.73

 129.84

 130.07

 130.23

 130.19

 130.24

 130.03

 129.70

 129.86

 129.91

 581

 515

 513

 539

 569

 605

 637

 665

 637

 609

 580

 530

 481

 536

 554

 548

 545

 556

 557

 535

 554

 564

 588

 604

 600

 605

 584

 551

 566

 571

STORAGE

-35

-66

-2

+26

+30

+36

+32

+28

-28

-28

-29

-50

-49

+55

+18

-6

-3

+11

+1

-22

+19

+10

+24

+16

-4

+5

-21

-33

+15

+5

CHANGE

37

37

57

53

65

63

61

59

35

41

40

39

50

92

58

52

53

54

54

54

72

63

68

63

46

48

48

53

83

78

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 30

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

PUTAH

 35

 50

 38

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 24

 30

 30

 39

 50

 39

 24

 30

 30

 23

 28

 40

 37

 33

 30

 30

 23

 20

 34

 45

 50

 50

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .11

 .07

 .12

 .13

 .15

 .11

 .12

 .07

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .15

 .03

 .00

 .07

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .15

 .13

 .19

 .14

 .10

 .07

 .00

 .15

 .15

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .57

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

NOVEMBER 2007 RUN DATE: 12/07/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -45 1,676 962 735 1 2.57 .63

ACRE-FEET -45 3,324 1,908 1,458 2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,458

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 1,908

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .63

JULY 1, 2007 3.39

 616

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §§131a, 131b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 131a, act Feb. 20, 1929, ch. 272, §2, 45 Stat. 1248, related to persons entitled to benefits of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers at Dayton, Ohio. See act July 3, 1939, ch. 863, §§1, 2, 5, 46 Stat. 1016, which dissolved the Home.

Section 131b, act Mar. 4, 1927, ch. 504, §2, 44 Stat. 1421, related to persons entitled to benefits of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers at Marion, Indiana.
§ 683.270 What safeguards are there to ensure that participants in Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act employment and training activities do not displace other employees? ( a ) A participant in a program or activity authorized under title I of WIOA must not displace (including a partial displacement, such as a reduction in the hours of non-overtime work, wages, or employment benefits) any currently employed employee (as of the date of the participation).
( b ) A program or activity authorized under title I of WIOA must not impair existing contracts for services or collective bargaining agreements. When a program or activity authorized under title I of WIOA would be inconsistent with a collective bargaining agreement, the appropriate labor organization and employer must provide written concurrence before the program or activity begins.
( c ) A participant in a program or activity under title I of WIOA may not be employed in or assigned to a job if: ( 1 ) Any other individual is on layoff from the same or any substantially equivalent job;
( 2 ) The employer has terminated the employment of any regular, unsubsidized employee or otherwise caused an involuntary reduction in its workforce with the intention of filling the vacancy so created with the WIOA participant; or
( 3 ) The job is created in a promotional line that infringes in any way on the promotional opportunities of currently employed workers as of the date of the participation.
( d ) Regular employees and program participants alleging displacement may file a complaint under the applicable grievance procedures found at § 683.600.
§ 680.660 Are separating military service members eligible for dislocated worker activities under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act? If the separating service member is separating from the Armed Forces with a discharge that is anything other than dishonorable, the separating service member qualifies for dislocated worker activities based on the following criteria: ( a ) The separating service member has received a notice of separation, a DD-214 from the Department of Defense, or other documentation showing a separation or imminent separation from the Armed Forces to satisfy the termination or layoff part of the dislocated worker eligibility criteria in WIOA sec. 3(15)(A)(i);
( b ) The separating service member qualifies for the dislocated worker eligibility criteria on eligibility for or exhaustion of unemployment compensation in WIOA sec. 3(15)(A)(ii)(I) or (II); and,
( c ) As a separating service member, the individual meets the dislocated worker eligibility criteria that the individual is unlikely to return to a previous industry or occupation in WIOA sec. 3(15)(A)(iii).
#### § 685.100 What is the purpose of the National Farmworker Jobs Program and the other services and activities established under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act?

The purpose of the NFJP and the other services and activities established under WIOA sec. 167 is to strengthen the ability of eligible migrant and seasonal farmworkers (MSFWs) and their dependents to obtain or retain unsubsidized employment, stabilize their unsubsidized employment and achieve economic self-sufficiency, including upgraded employment in agriculture. This part provides the regulatory requirements applicable to the expenditure of WIOA secs. 167 and 127(a)(1) funds for such programs, services, and activities.
### §310. Civil defense

In order to assure that adequate consideration is given to civil defense aspects in the planning and construction of highways constructed or reconstructed with the aid of Federal funds, the Secretary of Transportation is authorized and directed to consult, from time to time, with the Federal Civil Defense Administrator relative to the civil defense aspects of highways so constructed or reconstructed.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 914; Pub. L. 93–87, title I, §152(3), Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 276.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Pub. L. 93–87 substituted "Secretary of Transportation" for "Secretary of Commerce".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Transfer of Functions

Office of Federal Civil Defense Administrator, referred to in text, abolished and functions thereof transferred to President by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1958, set out as a note under section 5195 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare. The Plan also established a new agency in the Executive Office of the President, known as the Office of Defense and Civilian Mobilization to be headed by a Director. Office redesignated as the Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization by act Aug. 26, 1958 (72 Stat. 861; 42 U.S.C. 5195 note). Civil defense functions transferred to Secretary of Defense by Executive Order No. 10952 of July 20, 1961, formerly set out as a note under section 2271 of the former Appendix to Title 50, War and National Defense, and remaining functions redesignated Office of Emergency Planning by act Sept. 22, 1961 (75 Stat. 630; 42 U.S.C. 5195 note). Office redesignated Office of Emergency Preparedness by act Oct. 21, 1968 (82 Stat. 1194; 42 U.S.C. 5195 note). Office of Emergency Preparedness including office of Director abolished and functions thereof transferred to President by Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1973, set out as a note under section 5195 of Title 42.
### §3823. Regulations governing inspection

The Commission shall prescribe, and from time to time may amend, regulations concerning the inspection of vessels conforming as nearly as practicable to the laws and regulations governing marine inspection by the United States Coast Guard.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1813, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 493.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of authorities, functions, personnel, and assets of the Coast Guard, including the authorities and functions of the Secretary of Transportation relating thereto, to the Department of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 468(b), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
(No. 73-CC-279

#### Edwin L. Esser, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 22, 1974.*

Edwin L. Esser, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Martin A. Soll, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

A claim in this matter was filed in the Court of Claims on April 16, 1973, alleging that claimant’s car, while parked at the Illinois Department of Mental Health, Chicago Reed Health Center, was damaged by a projectile thrown from a lawn mower operated by James R. Harris, an employee of the Department of Mental Health.

From the testimony of claimant, it appears that Edwin L. Esser, an electrician employed by the State of Illinois, for a period of over thirty years, parked his automobile in the parking lot of the Reed Zone Medical Center, 6500 West Irving Park Road, Chicago, Illinois, where he was employed. From the police report of the Chicago Police Department, a statement from Peter Bertuccio, the Building and Grounds Supervisor of the *208Chicago Reed Mental Health Center, and from various other statements submitted at the hearing, it appears that an employee of respondent, James R. Harris, was driving a tractor with an attached law mower and while Harris was cutting the grass in the area north of the Power House with his rotary blade tractor, the blade threw an eighteen-inch length, two-by-four board, into the left fender of the claimant’s 1971 Lincoln automobile, denting the fender. Claimant had the automobile repaired and submitted a paid bill in the amount of $142.00.

From the evidence introduced at this hearing, the Court finds respondent was negligent, which negligence caused property damage to the claimant in the amount of $142.00.

An award is, therefore, made to claimant in the sum of $142.00.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1129 

KA 11-01031 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JASON LAWSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

LINDA M. CAMPBELL, SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (VICTORIA M. WHITE

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (Jeffrey R.

Merrill, A.J.), rendered October 5, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Lawson ([appeal No. 7] ___ AD3d

___ [Jan. 2, 2015]).

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
§ 10010.18 Content. ( a ) At a minimum, an EA will include brief discussions of the need for the proposal, of alternatives as required by section 102(2)(E) of NEPA, of the environmental impacts of the proposed action and such alternatives, and a listing of agencies and persons consulted (40 CFR 1508.9(b)).
( b ) In addition, an EA may be expanded to more fully describe the proposal and a broader range of alternatives if this facilitates planning and decision making.
( c ) The level of detail and depth of impact analysis should normally be limited to that needed to determine whether there are significant environmental effects.
( d ) An EA will contain objective and credible analyses which support its environmental impact conclusions. It will not, in and of itself, conclude whether or not an EIS will be prepared. This conclusion will be made upon review of the EA by the responsible official and documented in either a NOI or FONSI.