alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of Algorithms and Error Analyses for the Short Baseline Lightning Detection and Ranging SystemNASA, at the John F. Kennedy Space Center (KSC), developed and operates a unique high-precision lightning location system to provide lightning-related weather warnings. These warnings are used to stop lightning- sensitive operations such as space vehicle launches and ground operations where equipment and personnel are at risk. The data is provided to the Range Weather Operations (45th Weather Squadron, U.S. Air Force) where it is used with other meteorological data to issue weather advisories and warnings for Cape Canaveral Air Station and KSC operations. This system, called Lightning Detection and Ranging (LDAR), provides users with a graphical display in three dimensions of 66 megahertz radio frequency events generated by lightning processes. The locations of these events provide a sound basis for the prediction of lightning hazards. This document provides the basis for the design approach and data analysis for a system of radio frequency receivers to provide azimuth and elevation data for lightning pulses detected simultaneously by the LDAR system. The intent is for this direction-finding system to correct and augment the data provided by LDAR and, thereby, increase the rate of valid data and to correct or discard any invalid data. This document develops the necessary equations and algorithms, identifies sources of systematic errors and means to correct them, and analyzes the algorithms for random error. This data analysis approach is not found in the existing literature and was developed to facilitate the operation of this Short Baseline LDAR (SBLDAR). These algorithms may also be useful for other direction-finding systems using radio pulses or ultrasonic pulse data.Document ID19980219352Acquisition SourceKennedy Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsStarr, Stanley O.*(Dynacs Engineering Co., Inc. Cocoa Beach, FL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1998Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-207913NAS 1.15:207913Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS10-98001Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980219352.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>   1


                               [ FSI Letterhead ]

For additional information contact:    Laurie Walker-Trade Media (612) 448-8066
                                       Benno Sand-Investor and Financial Media
                                       (612) 448-8936

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

FSI INTERNATIONAL COMPLETES THE SALE OF ITS CHEMICAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION

     MINNEAPOLIS (Aug. 2, 1999) -- FSI International announced today that it has
completed the sale of its Chemical Management Division (CMD) for approximately
$38 million ((pound)23 million), subject to certain post-closing adjustments.
The company had entered into a formal agreement for the sale of the division on
June 9. It is anticipated the pre-tax gain on the sale of the division will be
approximately $25.0 million. FSI expects to use the net proceeds from the
transaction for working capital and to fund future investments in complementary
businesses, products or technologies.

     The CMD Division, which includes operations in Chaska, Minn., Hollister,
Calif., Newhaven, England, and Kyungui-do, Korea, was sold to The BOC Group, a
U.K.-based global company. CMD will become part of BOC Edwards, a BOC business
unit that supplies a broad range of products for the semiconductor industry,
including bulk and process gases, vacuum and abatement systems, slurry systems,
gas cabinets, nitrogen generators and design and site management services.

     "The divestiture of CMD allows FSI to move forward with its strategy to
focus on microlithography and surface conditioning process technology products,
programs and services," stated Joel Elftmann, FSI chairman and chief executive
officer.

     To support this strategy, the Company's Microlithography Division recently
introduced its entry into the emerging low-k, spin-on dielectric segment of the
semiconductor equipment market with the new CALYPSOTM system. In addition, the
Company recently announced its intent to expand into immersion cleaning,
utilizing the technology received from the pending acquisition of YieldUP


<PAGE>   2


FSI International Inc.
August 2, 1999
Page 2


International. This will provide the Surface Conditioning Division with
the capability to deliver total cleaning solutions to customers.

     FSI International, Inc. is a leading global supplier of processing
equipment used at key production steps to manufacture microelectronics. The
company develops, manufactures, markets and supports products used in technology
areas of surface conditioning, microlithography and the spin-on dielectric
market. FSI International's customers include microelectronics manufactures
located throughout North America, Europe, Japan and the Asia-Pacific region.

     Additional information on FSI International can be obtained by accessing
its homepage at http://www.fsi-intl.com.

                                      # # #
#### Jacob Harris, as Administrator, etc., Appellant, v. Ella S. Reed, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 15th day of January, 1914, dismissing complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case upon a trial at Trial Term, and also from an order entered on the lGth day of January, 1914, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

We think that the evidence in this case presented a question for the jury as to defendant’s negligence and the freedom of the deceased from contributory negligence. The judgment and order-appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with, costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order-reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.531 Who may submit attestations for locations in Alaska?

In order to use alien crewmembers to perform longshore activities at a particular location in the State of Alaska an employer shall submit an attestation on Form ETA 9033-A. As noted at § 655.502, “Definitions,” for purposes of §§ 655.530 through 655.541, which govern the performance of longshore activities by alien crewmembers under the Alaska exception, “employer” includes any agent or representative designated by the employer. An employer may file a single attestation for multiple locations in the State of Alaska.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 6,363

 5,357

 6,053

 5,836

 5,089

 4,812

 5,166

 4,670

 4,024

 4,505

 4,987

 4,693

 5,074

 4,870

 5,225

 3,763

 4,502

 3,907

 4,325

 4,364

 3,664

 3,965

 3,942

 3,597

 1,176

 2,816

 3,602

 3,890

 3,822

 3,614

 3,633

 170,082

 167,622

 164,330

 161,864

 159,315

 156,184

 152,946

 150,207

 147,133

 143,599

 140,699

 138,401

 135,940

 133,963

 131,891

 130,261

 127,322

 125,233

 122,683

 120,658

 118,771

 116,313

 114,264

 112,296

 110,098

 105,710

 103,100

 101,367

 99,994

 98,625

 97,127

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: March 6, 2006

 176,445

 172,979

 170,383

 167,700

 164,404

 160,996

 158,112

 154,877

 151,157

 148,104

 145,686

 143,094

 141,014

 138,833

 137,116

 134,024

 131,824

 129,140

 127,008

 125,022

 122,435

 120,278

 118,206

 115,893

 111,274

 108,526

 106,702

 105,257

 103,816

 102,239

 100,760

 6,491,000

 6,470,000

 6,449,000

 6,427,000

 6,406,000

 6,385,000

 6,363,000

 6,342,000

 6,321,000

 6,300,000

 6,278,000

 6,257,000

 6,236,000

 6,214,000

 6,193,000

 6,172,000

 6,150,000

 6,129,000

 6,108,000

 6,086,000

 6,065,000

 6,044,000

 6,022,000

 6,001,000

 5,980,000

 5,959,000

 5,937,000

 5,916,000

 5,895,000

 5,873,000

 5,852,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 179,033
USGS-Florida Water Science Center

DATE OF INITIAL LOGGING

ELEVATION 197 ft NGDV 29 (estimated)

DATE OF COMPLETION 21 October 2013

LOCATION 30–34–08.2 N (NAD 83) GPS

2 December 2013

PROJECT City of Tallahassee test well 32

WELL DEPTH 440 ft TD (logged to 412 ft)

084–15–23.4 W

WELL City of Tallahasse test well 32

Temperature

 ̊C

 ̊C  ̊C

Fluid resistivity

Ohm-m

Fluid conductivity

μS/cm

Specific conductance(25  ̊C)

μS/cm

Ambient fluid probe

Fluid temperature

Fluid conductivity

μS/cm

pH

Dissolved oxygen Dissolved oxygen

%

Redox

mV

Ambient before pumping

Fluid temperature

Fluid conductivity

μS/cm

pH

%

Redox

mV

Ambient after pumping

Water quality tool

SFM ambient down

0 cps

SFM ambient up

0

0° 90° 180° 270° 0° 0° 90° 180° 270° 0° 0

cps

Ambient before pumping

SFM pump down

0 cps

SFM pump up

0 cps

Pumping from well

Spinner flowmeter

Mean Vp

0 Feet/second

Raymer-Hunt sonic porosity

0 % 100

Reciever 1

0 μs

15 KHz signal

Reciever 1

0 μs

Mean Vst

0 Feet/second

Stoneley amplitude

100

4,392 20,000 4,288 20,000

120

40

21.2

330

9

60

32

20

290

7

0

–16

21

330

9

4

15

20

230

7

70

70

8

8

0

21

60

28

300

400

20

20

200

200

–400

80

0 %

1 KHz signal

Full waveform sonic logs Depth

1 ft:96 ft

Optical borehole image Acoustic borehole image-amplitude Caliper

Inches

Natural gamma

0 cps

Induction conductivity

0 mS/m

Induction resistivity

0 Ohm-m

Test well 32

300

305

310

315

320

325

330

335

340

345

350

355

360

365

370

375

380

385

390

395

400

405

410

295

Appendix 1. Comparison of borehole image, geophysical, water quality, flowmeter, and sonic logs showing evidence of three productive intervals in the City of Tallahassee test well 32 at Leon County, Florida, December 2013. Only the data collected in the open interval of the test well are displayed at 1 to 96 scale.

[N, north; NAD 83, North American Datum of 1983; GPS, Global Positioning System; ft, feet; NGVD 29, National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929; TD, total depth; W, west; °C, degree Celsius; m, meter; μs/cm, microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius; SFM, spinner flowmeter; cps, counts per second; 

%, percent; mv, millivolt; mS/m, millisiemensz per meter; μs, microseconds; KHz, kilohertz; Vst, Stoneley wave velocity; Vp, compressional wave velocity]

307–311 ft productive interval

387–390 ft productive interval

339–350 ft productive interval
### §286k–2. Suspension of right of International Bank to issue securities under section 286k–1; report of Securities and Exchange Commission

The Securities and Exchange Commission acting in consultation with the National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Financial Problems is authorized to suspend the provisions of section 286k–1 (a) of this title at any time as to any or all securities issued or guaranteed by the bank during the period of such suspension. The Commission shall include in its annual reports to Congress such information as it shall deem advisable with regard to the operations and effect of this section, and section 286k–1 of this title and section 24 of title 12 and in connection therewith shall include any views submitted for such purpose by any association of dealers registered with the Commission.

(June 29, 1949, ch. 276, §3, 63 Stat. 299.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act July 31, 1945, ch. 339, 59 Stat. 512, known as the Bretton Woods Agreements Act, which comprises this subchapter.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Financial Problems delegated to National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Financial Policies, see section 2(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 11269, Feb. 14, 1966, 31 F.R. 2813, set out as a note under section 286b of this title.
§ 418.1110 What is the effective date of our initial determination about your income-related monthly adjustment amount? ( a ) Generally, an income-related monthly adjustment amount will be effective for all months that you are enrolled in Medicare Part B during the year for which we determine you must pay an income-related monthly adjustment amount. We will follow the rules in 42 CFR part 408, subpart C, regarding premium collections to withhold your income-related monthly adjustment amount from a benefit payment or to determine if you will be billed directly.
( b ) When we have used modified adjusted gross income information from IRS for the tax year 3 years prior to the effective year to determine your income-related monthly adjustment amount and modified adjusted gross income information for the tax year 2 years prior later becomes available from IRS, we will review the new information to determine if we should revise our initial determination. If we revise our initial determination, the effective date of the new initial determination will be January 1 of the effective year, or the first month you were enrolled or re-enrolled in Medicare Part B if later than January.
( c ) When we use your amended tax return, as described in § 418.1150, the effective date will be January 1 of the year(s) that is affected, or the first month in that year that you were enrolled or reenrolled in Medicare Part B if later than January. Example: You are enrolled in Medicare Part B throughout 2011. We use your 2009 modified adjusted gross income as reported to us by IRS to determine your 2011 income-related monthly adjustment amount. In 2012 you submit to us a copy of your 2009 amended tax return that you filed with IRS. The modified adjusted gross income reported on your 2009 amended tax return is significantly less than originally reported to IRS. We use the modified adjusted gross income that was reported on your 2009 amended tax return to determine your income-related monthly adjustment amount. That income-related monthly adjustment amount is effective January 1, 2011. We will retroactively adjust for any differences between the amount paid in 2011 and the amount that should have been paid based on the amended tax return.
( d ) When we use evidence that you provide which proves that the IRS modified adjusted gross income information we used is incorrect, as described in § 418.1335, the effective date will be January of the year(s) that is affected or the first month in that year that you were enrolled or reenrolled in Medicare Part B if later than January.
( e ) When we use information from a more recent tax year that you provide due to a major life-changing event, as described in § 418.1201, the effective date is described in § 418.1230.
### SUBCHAPTER I—TRIBALLY CONTROLLED COLLEGES OR UNIVERSITIES GRANT PROGRAM
### Re:OZONE NAAQS RIA for OPEI / OMB review Kathy Kaufman to: Mary Henigin 10/19/2009 03:26 PM

Cc: Amy Lamson, Brian Heninger, Charles Fulcher, Charlotte Bertrand, Darryl Weatherhead, David Misenheimer, James Hemby, Joseph-J Dougherty, Lydia Wegman, Nathalie Simon, Neal Fann, Patricia Grim, Ron Evans, Rosalina Rodriguez, "Alan Rush", Tricia Crabtree oops, meant to change the title to Ozone, not SO2. Hazard of cutting and pasting messages... Kathy Kaufman EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C439-02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone 919 541 0102 Fax 919 541 5489

Kathy Kaufman 10/19/2009 03:24:12 PM Mary -- By this email OAQPS is transmitting to y...
From: Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US To: Mary Henigin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Amy Lamson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Brian Heninger/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Darryl Weatherhead/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, David Misenheimer/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nathalie Simon/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Neal Fann/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Rosalina Rodriguez/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Alan Rush" <Rush.alan@epa.gov>, Tricia Crabtree/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Patricia Grim/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Charles Fulcher/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 10/19/2009 03:24 PM Subject: Re: SO2 NAAQS RIA for OPEI / OMB review Mary -- By this email OAQPS is transmitting to you Sections 1 through 4 of the Ozone Reconsideration NAAQS RIA Supplemental Analysis, to transmit to OPEI for OMB review.
The sections are attached below.
Thanks! -- Kathy [attachment "S4-Supplemental Analysis- Secondary Standard 10.15.09.docx" deleted by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US] [attachment "S2-Suppmental Analysis - 060 & 055 10-19-09.docx" deleted by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US] [attachment "S3-Supplemental Analysis- Updated Benefits 10.19.09.docx" deleted by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US] [attachment "S1-Supplemental Analysis Summary 10-19-09.docx" deleted by Kathy Kaufman/RTP/USEPA/US] Kathy Kaufman EPA/OAQPS Mail Code C439-02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone 919 541 0102 Fax 919 541 5489
### §§55, 56. Repealed. Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1131(7), (51), 60 Stat. 1036

Section 55, R.S. §1695, related to limits of consulates.

Section 56, acts Feb. 27, 1925, ch. 364, 43 Stat. 1017; Apr. 29, 1926, ch. 195, title I, 44 Stat. 333; Feb. 24, 1927, ch. 189, title I, 44 Stat. 1182, related to appointment of consular clerks.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective three months after Aug. 13, 1946, see act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1141, 60 Stat. 1040.
### **CHAPTER 19—INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENTS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—RHODE ISLAND INDIAN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

Sec.
1701 to 1716. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—MAINE INDIAN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1721 to 1735. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—FLORIDA INDIAN (MICCOSUKEE) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1741 to 1750e. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER IV—CONNECTICUT INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1751 to 1760. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER V—MASSACHUSETTS INDIAN LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1771 to 1771i. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER VI—FLORIDA INDIAN (SEMINOLE) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1772 to 1772g. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER VII—WASHINGTON INDIAN (PUYALLUP) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1773 to 1773j. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER VIII—SENECA NATION (NEW YORK) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1774 to 1774h. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER IX—MOHEGAN NATION (CONNECTICUT) LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1775 to 1775h. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER X—CROW LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1776 to 1776k. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER XI—SANTO DOMINGO PUEBLO LAND CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1777 to 1777e. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER XII—TORRES-MARTINEZ DESERT CAHUILLA INDIANS CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1778 to 1778h. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER XIII—CHEROKEE, CHOCTAW, AND CHICKASAW NATIONS CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1779 to 1779g. Omitted.

#### SUBCHAPTER XIV—PUEBLO DE SAN ILDEFONSO CLAIMS SETTLEMENT

1780 to 1780p. Omitted.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This chapter, comprised of sections 1701 to 1780p of this title, relating to settlement of the land claims of certain Indian tribes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 702.214 Notice; form and content.

Notice shall be in writing on a form prescribed by the Director for this purpose; such form shall be made available to the employee or beneficiary by the employer. The notice shall be signed by the person authorized to give notice, and shall contain the name, address and Social Security Number (SSN) of the employee and, in death cases, also the SSN of the person seeking survivor benefits, and a statement of the time, place, nature and cause of the injury or death.

[58 FR 68032, Dec. 23, 1993]
#### Charles M. FOOSHEE, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12440.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 9, 1955.

*262John M. O’Mara, Cincinnati, Ohio (Charles M. Fooshee, Jr., Springfield, Mo., pro se on the brief), for appellant.

Robert E. Joyner, Memphis, Tenn. (Millsaps Fitzhugh, Edward N. Vaden, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for appellee.

Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MCALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case comes on appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate sentence of ten years’ imprisonment and a fine of $1,000 imposed by Judge Boyd in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee for violation of the anti-narcotic laws of the United States.

In effect, the points raised on this appeal are that a physician’s prescription for narcotics which contains on the direction of the defendant to whom the prescription was issued a false name and address, and the furnishing of a false name and address when the defendant applied for the prescription for narcotics, are not criminal acts violative of Title 18, section 494, U.S.C.A. We think the argument is not well made. A prescription for narcotics comes within the meaning of the phrase “other writings” as used in the above cited Code section. United States v. Tommasello, 9 Cir., 160 F.2d 348, affirming D.C., 64 F.Supp. 467. Cf. Hart v. Squier, 9 Cir., 159 F.2d 639; Johnson v. Warden, 9 Cir., 134 F.2d 166, certiorari denied 319 U.S. 763, 63 S.Ct. 1320, 87 L.Ed. 1714; Prussian v. United States, 282 U.S. 67551 S.Ct. 223, 75 L.Ed. 610. See also Lewis v. United States, 9 Cir., 170 F.2d 43.

Moreover, inasmuch as the appellant here did not appeal from his conviction, the motion to dismiss his present appeal is well taken for the reason that the question now raised should have been raised on a direct appeal from his conviction. See Sunal v. Large, 332 U.S. 174, 67 S.Ct. 1588, 91 L.Ed. 1982; Goto v. Lane, 265 U.S. 393, 44 S.Ct. 525, 68 L.Ed. 1070.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed; and the motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained.
### Part A—Indian Self-Determination
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard Carr, Appellant, against William Hunt, as Warden of Attica State Prison, Respondent.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, DowEng, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
#### § 703.110 Other forms of endorsements and policies.

Where the form of endorsement prescribed by § 703.109 is not appropriate when used in conjunction with a form of policy approved for use by the Office no modification thereof shall be used unless specifically approved by the Office. Where the form of policy is designed to include therein the obligations of the insurer under said Act without the use of the appropriate endorsements, the policy shall contain the provisions required to be included in any of the endorsements. Such a policy, however, shall not be used until expressly approved by the Office.