alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 725.715 How do providers submit medical bills? ( a ) A provider must itemize charges on Form OWCP-1500 or CMS-1500 (for professional services, equipment or drugs dispensed in the office), Form OWCP-04 or UB-04 (for hospitals), an electronic or paper-based bill that includes required data elements (for pharmacies) or other form as designated by OWCP, and submit the form promptly to OWCP.
( b ) The provider must identify each medical service performed using the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) code, the National Drug Code (NDC) number, or the Revenue Center Code (RCC), as appropriate to the type of service. OWCP has discretion to determine which of these codes may be utilized in the billing process. OWCP also has the authority to create and supply codes for specific services or treatments. These OWCP-created codes will be issued to providers by OWCP as appropriate and may only be used as authorized by OWCP. A provider may not use an OWCP-created code for other types of medical examinations, services or treatments. ( 1 ) For professional medical services, the provider must list each diagnosed condition in order of priority and furnish the corresponding diagnostic code using the “International Classification of Disease, 10th Edition, Clinical Modification” (ICD-10-CM), or as revised.
( 2 ) For prescription drugs or supplies, the provider must include the NDC assigned to the product, and such other information as OWCP may require.
( 3 ) For outpatient medical services, the provider must use HCPCS codes and other coding schemes in accordance with the Outpatient Prospective Payment System.
( 4 ) For inpatient medical services, the provider must include admission and discharge summaries and an itemized statement of the charges.
( c ) ( 1 ) By submitting a bill or accepting payment, the provider signifies that the service for which reimbursement is sought was performed as described, necessary, appropriate, and properly billed in accordance with accepted industry standards. For example, accepted industry standards preclude upcoding billed services for extended medical appointments when the miner actually had a brief routine appointment, or charging for the services of a professional when a paraprofessional or aide performed the service; industry standards prohibit unbundling services to charge separately for services that should be billed as a single charge.
( 2 ) The provider agrees to comply with all regulations set forth in this subpart concerning the provision of medical services or treatments and/or the process for seeking reimbursement for medical services and treatments, including the limitation imposed on the amount to be paid.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA FOR THE THREE-MONTH
PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,448
<PP&E>                                         356,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 566,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,226
<BONDS>                                        189,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,945
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   566,917
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,838
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,903
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,908
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,995
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M IC HAEL B . SPARLIN; SHAR ON J. SPARLIN, Plaintiffs - Appe lla nts, v. C OUNTR

YW IDE HOM E LOANS INC ORPOR

ATED; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 11-17259 D.C . No. 4:11-c v-00371-DC B M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na David C . B ury , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 19, 2013 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, TR OTT, a nd THOM AS, C irc uit Judge s. M ic ha e l B . a

nd Sha ron J. Spa rlin a p pe a l pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing the ir a c tion a rising out of fore c losure proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo a dism i ssa l ba se d on 

# FIL ED D EC 10 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).pre c lusion princ iple s. W olfson v . Bramme r , 616 F.3d 1045, 1064 (9th C i r. 2010) (c olla t e ra l e stoppe l); Ste w art v . U.S. Banc orp , 297 F.3d 953, 956 (9th C i r. 2002) (re s judic ata ). W e m ay

a ffirm on a ny ground supporte d by

the re c ord, Thompson v . Paul , 547 F.3d 1055, 1058-59 (9th C ir. 2008), a nd we a ffirm . Dism issa l of the Sparlins’ a c tion a s ba rre d by the doc trine s of c olla

t e ra l e stoppe l a nd re s judic ata

wa s prope r be c a

use the Sparlins ha d

a full a nd fa ir opportunity

to litiga te the issue s a

nd c la im s a

rising out of the

fore c losure proc e e dings a

t issuein the ir prior a c tion a ga inst ne arly ide ntic a l de fe nda

nts, a nd that a c t ion wa s dismisse d with pre judic e for fa ilure to sta

te a c la im . Se eW

olfson , 616 F.3d a

t 1064 (discussing e le m e nts of c o lla t e ra l e stoppe l); Ste w art , 297 F.3d a t 956-57 (disc ussing e l e m e nt s of re s judic at a , a nd noting tha

t “ dism issa l for fa ilure to sta te a c l a im ” c onstitute s a

fina l judgm e nt on them e rits to which re s judic ata a pplie s). The Sparlins’ c onte ntions re ga rding thede nia l of disc ove ry and a lle g e d viola tions of the ir c i vil rights a re unpe rsua sive . W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f. Se ePadge tt v . W right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). AFFIRM E D. 1 1 - 1 7 2 5 9 2
### §2679d. Exemption from certain procurement protest procedures for noncompetitive contracting in emergency circumstances

A determination by the Department to use procedures other than competitive procedures under section 3304 of title 41 in order to meet emergency security requirements, as determined by the Secretary or the Secretary's designee, including physical security upgrades, protective equipment, and other immediate threat mitigation projects, shall not be subject to challenge by protest under either subchapter V of chapter 35 of title 31 or section 1491 of title 28.

(Pub. L. 114–323, title I, §115, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1911.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of "Department" and "Secretary" as used in this section, see section 2 of Pub. L. 114–323, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 2,423

 3,317

 2,911

 3,007

 2,935

 2,898

 2,387

 2,650

 2,730

 3,571

 2,647

 2,401

 2,400

 2,588

 2,436

 2,544

 2,640

 2,879

 2,688

 2,571

 3,052

 3,159

 2,423

 3,078

 2,834

 2,889

 2,987

 2,518

 2,588

 2,970

 58,420

 57,801

 58,062

 57,925

 57,885

 57,779

 57,643

 57,029

 56,695

 56,454

 57,023

 56,687

 56,133

 55,607

 55,285

 54,835

 54,510

 54,293

 54,313

 54,151

 53,886

 54,091

 54,387

 53,970

 54,195

 54,178

 54,214

 54,341

 54,016

 53,774

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2009 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: October 1, 2009

 60,843

 61,118

 60,973

 60,932

 60,820

 60,677

 60,030

 59,679

 59,425

 60,025

 59,670

 59,088

 58,533

 58,195

 57,721

 57,379

 57,150

 57,172

 57,001

 56,722

 56,938

 57,250

 56,810

 57,048

 57,029

 57,067

 57,201

 56,859

 56,604

 56,744

 5,170,000

 5,149,000

 5,127,000

 5,106,000

 5,085,000

 5,063,000

 5,042,000

 5,021,000

 5,000,000

 4,978,000

 4,957,000

 4,936,000

 4,914,000

 4,893,000

 4,872,000

 4,850,000

 4,829,000

 4,808,000

 4,786,000

 4,765,000

 4,744,000

 4,722,000

 4,701,000

 4,680,000

 4,659,000

 4,637,000

 4,616,000

 4,595,000

 4,573,000

 4,552,000

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 61,495
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Probe Manufacturing, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:  (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  November 19, 2010By: /s/ John BennettChief Financial OfficerDateJohn Bennett  The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period year ended December 31, 2009, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance
   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Des Moines,
IowaMarch 13, 2006




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; andv2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
#### Nellie Rubinstein et al., Appellants, v. 1900 Jerome Avenue Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Dore, J, P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 708.32

 708.62

 709.30

 707.38

 707.76

 709.17

 707.88

 707.31

 708.17

 707.33

 707.86

 707.14

 707.60

 707.10

 707.50

 707.83

 708.17

 707.34

 707.66

 707.90

 708.20

 708.46

 708.70

 707.16

 707.84

 708.19

 707.14

 707.33

 709.11

 709.88

 814

 822

 841

 788

 798

 838

 802

 786

 810

 786

 801

 781

 794

 780

 791

 800

 810

 787

 795

 802

 811

 818

 825

 781

 801

 810

 781

 786

 836

 858

STORAGE

+7

+8

+19

-53

+10

+40

-36

-16

+24

-24

+15

-20

+13

-14

+11

+9

+10

-23

+8

+7

+9

+7

+7

-44

+20

+9

-29

+5

+50

+22

CHANGE

5

4

10

-13

5

21

30

6

12

-4

8

-3

7

-2

6

5

5

-5

5

5

6

4

4

-11

10

5

-8

9

25

12

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 14

 0

 1

 48

 14

 0

 8

 0

 7

 0

 5

 0

 0

 0

 7

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 11

 0

 0

 7

 6

 0

 1

 0930

 1125

 1140

TIME

 .23

 .21

 .24

COPPER

 .95

 .86

 1.05

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2005 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2006

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +51 163 0 133

ACRE-FEET +51 323 0 264

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 264

 264

 807

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .003

Table 7
### §§2124a, 2124b. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–288, §§9(a), 11, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3407, 3408

Section 2124a, Pub. L. 87–63, title III, §302, as added Pub. L. 97–63, §4(c)(2), Oct. 16, 1981, 95 Stat. 1015; amended Pub. L. 102–372, §15, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1181, provided for establishment of Tourism Policy Council. See section 2124 of this title.

Section 2124b, Pub. L. 87–63, title III, §303, as added Pub. L. 97–63, §4(c)(2), Oct. 16, 1981, 95 Stat. 1017; amended Pub. L. 102–372, §16, Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1181, provided for establishment of Travel and Tourism Advisory Board.
#### § 702.503 Vocational rehabilitation; action by adviser.

The vocational rehabilitation adviser, upon receipt of the referral, shall promptly consider the feasibility of a vocational referral or request for cooperative services from available resources or facilities, to include counseling, vocational survey, selective job placement assistance, and retraining. Public or private agencies may be utilized in arranging necessary vocational rehabilitation services under the Federal Vocational Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. 31 *et seq.*
### **CHAPTER 5—COLUMBIA INSTITUTION FOR THE DEAF**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                        2,001
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 3,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                  982
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,048
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,140
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         32
<BONDS>                                       3,340
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    7,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11,140
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              765
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (82)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (82)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (2.12)
        

</TABLE>
(No. 4736

#### Cecil M. Sargeant, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January*8, *1957.*

John J. Blake, Attorney for Claimant.

Latham Castle, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*476Fearer, J.

Cecil M. Sargeant, claimant, filed Ms claim in tMs Court on August 2,1956, alleging:

> 1. That he was inducted into the Armed Services of the United States on September 4, 1942, and served until January 26, 1944;

> 2. That for more than six months prior to his induction into the Armed Forces he was a resident! of the State of Illinois;

> 3. That in March of 1951, as provided by the statute of this state, he made application to the Service Recognition Board for a veteran’s bonus; that his application was denied on the ground that he was discharged under the provisions of Section VIII, AR615360;

> 4. That application for a corrected discharge was made on December 12, 1955, and that the discharge was corrected showing claimant was entitled to an honorable discharge; that this honorable discharge was filed in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Recorder of Knox County on April 30, 1956.

On October 22, 1956, tMs Court granted leave to respondent, upon motion duly made, and upon giving notice to claimant, to file a motion to strike the claim. No objections were filed to the motion, so that tMs case now comes on for hearing upon the complaint and motion filed by respondent thereto.

. The question presented concerns Chap. 1261⁄2, Sec. 65, Par. 3, 1955 Ill. Rev. Stats., which is as follows:

> “Any person who had a claim, which would have been compensable by the Service Recognition Board except that during the period for filing claims such person was ineligible by reason of a dishonorable discharge from service, who prior to July 1, 1953, has or shall have such discharge reviewed and has obtained or shall obtain an honorable discharge, and any person who had an amended or supplemental claim pending before the Service Recognition Board on May 20, 1953, but had not by that date submitted sufficient evidence upon which the Service Recognition Board could pay the amended or supplemental claim, shall be entitled to have such claim considered by the Court of Claims, and to have an award on the same basis' as if his claim had been fully considered by the Service Recognition Board."

*477Inasmuch as the Service Recognition Board denied the claim, because of the dishonorable discharge, and inasmuch as claimant did not, prior to July 1, 1953, have such discharge reviewed, and obtain an honorable discharge, nor did he have on file an amended or supplemental claim pending before the Service Recognition Board on May 20, 1953, this Court would not have jurisdiction by reason of said statute to allow said claim.

It is, therefore, the opinion of this Court that the motion to strike the complaint filed herein should be, and the same is hereby allowed, and the complaint filed herein dismissed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4494 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a deduction for 

rent paid or accrued on the personal residence of the taxpayer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2016 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

deduction for rent paid or accrued on the personal residence of the taxpayer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renters Fairness and 

5 Equality Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR RENT PAID ON PERSONAL RESI7 DENCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part VI of subchapter B of chap9 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

10 by inserting after section 163 the following: 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4494 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 163A. RENT PAID ON PERSONAL RESIDENCE. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There shall be allowed as a de3 duction all rent paid or accrued within the taxable year 

4 on the principal residence (within the meaning of section 

5 121) of the taxpayer. 

6 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—No amount shall be allowed as a 

7 deduction under subsection (a) for the taxable year with 

8 respect to such principal residence if the assessed or ap9 praised value of such principal residence for the taxable 

10 year exceeds $1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a mar11 ried individual filing a separate return). 

12 ‘‘(c) COORDINATION.—No amount may be deducted 

13 under subsection (a) if a deduction is allowable under sec14 tion 163 for qualified residence interest (as defined in sec15 tion 163(h)(3)) or a deduction is allowable under section 

16 164(a)(1) for real property taxes paid or accrued for the 

17 taxable year with respect to such principal residence.’’. 

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

19 for part VI of subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code 

20 is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 

21 163 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 163A. Rent paid on personal residence.’’. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

23 this section shall apply to amounts paid or accrued after 

24 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS