alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4383 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to enhance Department of 

Homeland Security coordination on how to identify and record information regarding individuals suspected or convicted of human trafficking, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2016 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California (for herself and Ms. MCSALLY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a 

period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to enhance 

Department of Homeland Security coordination on how 

to identify and record information regarding individuals 

suspected or convicted of human trafficking, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘DHS Human Traf5 ficking Prevention Act of 2016’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4383 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCED DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

2 COORDINATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home5 land Security shall issue Department of Homeland Secu6 rity-wide directive to Department personnel concerning— 

7 (1) how to identify and record information re8 garding individuals suspected or convicted of human 

9 trafficking that, in addition to including the names 

10 of such individuals, may include other personally 

11 identifiable information; and 

12 (2) practices to enhance collaboration within 

13 the Department for the systematic and routine shar14 ing of information on individuals suspected or con15 victed of human trafficking. 

16 (b) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS.—Not 

17 later than one year after the date of the enactment of this 

18 Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall ensure that, 

19 consistent with the Department of Homeland Security20 wide directive required under subsection (a), information 

21 technology systems utilized within the Department to 

22 record and track information regarding individuals sus23 pected or convicted of human trafficking are integrated 

24 with each other. 

25 (c) OVERSIGHT.—Not later than 18 months after the 

26 date of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4383 IH

1 of the Department of Homeland Security shall report to 

2 the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 

3 Representatives and the Committee on Homeland Security 

4 and Governmental Affairs of the Senate on the status of 

5 implementation of this section. 

6 (d) HUMAN TRAFFICKING DEFINED.—The term 

7 ‘‘human trafficking’’ means an act or practice described 

8 in paragraph (9) or (10) of section 103 of the Trafficking 

9 Victims Protection Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 422.701 Scope and purpose.

The regulations in this subpart describe the limited circumstances under which SSA is authorized to listen-in to or record telephone conversations. The purpose of this subpart is to inform the public and SSA employees of those circumstances and the procedures that SSA will follow when conducting telephone service observation activities.
(June 22, 1943.)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joan P. Gaines, Respondent, against Henry T. Luria, Appellant.

Per *Curiam.*

On the merits, under all the facts and circumstances disclosed in this record, we think the custody by the father should not be changed. The order entered April 15, 1942, appealed from should be reversed, the writ dismissed and the infant child of the parties should remain in the custody of the father Henry E. Luria with the right of the mother to visit the child while in the father’s custody at all reasonable times and with the further right of either party to apply to the court for further directions on the showing of a change of circumstances affecting the welfare of the infant.

In view of our disposition of the appeal from the order entered in the habeas corpus proceeding, the appeal from the order denying the stay should be dismissed as academic.

Martin, P. J., Townley and Dore, JJ., concur; Untermyer and Cohn, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.

Order entered April 15, 1942, reversed, the writ dismissed, and the infant child of the parties shall remain in the custody of the father Henry E. Luria with the right of the mother to visit the child while in the father’s custody at all reasonable times and with the further right of either party to apply to the court for further directions on the showing of a change of circumstances affecting the welfare of the infant. Appeal from order entered April 9, 1942, denying motion for a stay dismissed. Settle order on notice.
#### Truman H. Miner, Defendant in Error, v. George V. McIntyre, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 17,348.

1. Assumpsit, action *op*— when *action for money had and received will not lie.*When an attorney receives less than his agreed fee on compromising a suit therefor against his client, the client claiming to be liable to another attorney for the balance of the agreed fee, the money is paid and received as money of the first attorney and the other cannot recover from him as for money had and received for such other’s use.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert N. Scott, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

Reversed with finding of fact.

Opinion filed October 1, 1912.

John A. McKeown, for plaintiff in error.

James E. Gillis, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice F. A. Smith

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error sued plaintiff in error, claiming that money was due him under a written contract which he set out in his original statement of claim. The contract was not offered in evidence. At the conclusion of the testimony, defendant in error filed an amended statement of claim, averring that plaintiff in error was indebted to him for money had and received for the use of defendant in error.

Judgment for $37.50 was entered against the plaintiff in error on a finding by the court.

Upon consideration of the evidence, we do not think that it justified a recovery on the ground of money had and received. The evidence does not make out a case against the plaintiff in error, showing that the money he collected from Eobertson in settlement of *283his suit against Robertson for fee, or any part of it, was due to defendant in error. The evidence does not prove that Robertson paid the money to plaintiff in error for the use of defendant in error. The evidence shows that Robertson retained the plaintiff in error to conduct a case against one Graves for personal injuries, and that Robertson agreed to pay plaintiff in error $100 fee for his services in the case. It became necessary for plaintiff in error to sue Robertson to recover for his fee. The suit was compromised without a trial and the plaintiff in error was paid $62.50 for his claim of $100; the difference of $37.50 was deducted by agreement between Robertson and the plaintiff in error upon the contention of Robertson that he expected to have to pay defendant in error $37.50. There can be no recovery on the ground of money had and received for use of another when the money was paid and received as money of the one receiving it. The judgment is reversed with a finding of fact.

*Reversed with a, finding of fact.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 722.22

 722.34

 722.43

 722.53

 722.61

 722.68

 722.75

 722.83

 722.92

 722.97

 723.02

 723.10

 723.20

 723.29

 723.34

 723.39

 723.43

 723.48

 723.63

 723.80

 723.98

 725.13

 725.41

 725.57

 725.68

 725.80

 725.91

 726.04

 720.60

 721.11

 1,267

 1,272

 1,275

 1,279

 1,282

 1,284

 1,287

 1,290

 1,293

 1,295

 1,297

 1,300

 1,304

 1,307

 1,309

 1,311

 1,312

 1,314

 1,320

 1,326

 1,333

 1,378

 1,389

 1,395

 1,400

 1,404

 1,408

 1,414

 1,208

 1,226

STORAGE

+5

+5

+3

+4

+3

+2

+3

+3

+3

+2

+2

+3

+4

+3

+2

+2

+1

+2

+6

+6

+7

+45

+11

+6

+5

+4

+4

+6

-206

+18

CHANGE

3

3

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

3

3

4

23

6

3

3

2

2

3

-16

9

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 88

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2014

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -36 76 0 88

ACRE-FEET -36 151 0 175

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 175

 175

 1,262

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of RF Industries,  Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended July 31, 2003, as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Terrie A. Gross,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


   /s/ Terrie A. Gross
-------------------------
Terrie A. Gross
Chief Financial Officer
September 10, 2003
#### The State Bank, Appellant, v. Jacob Jacobowitz and Others, Defendants. Archibald H. Whan, as Receiver, etc., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
### §327. Notification to committing court of discharge or conditional release

In the case of any person hospitalized under section 324 of this title who has been judicially committed to the Secretary's custody, the Secretary shall, upon the discharge or conditional release of such person, or upon such person's transfer and release under section 323 of this title, notify the committing court of such discharge or conditional release or such transfer and release.

(Pub. L. 86–571, §7, July 5, 1960, 74 Stat. 310.)
Exhibit 23.4
                                                                    ------------

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement No. 333-99153 of Chesapeake
Funding LLC (formerly known as Greyhound Funding LLC) on Form S-3 of our report
dated January 21, 2002 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
explanatory paragraphs relating to Chesapeake Funding LLC as if it had been
operated as an unaffiliated entity and the adoption of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Chesapeake Funding LLC for the year ended December 31, 2001, and to the use of
such report dated January 21, 2002, incorporated by reference in the Prospectus,
which is a part of this Registration Statement.

         We also consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
the Registration Statement No. 333-99153-01 of D.L. Peterson Trust on Form S-1
of our report dated January 21, 2002 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and
includes an explanatory paragraph relating to D.L. Peterson Trust as if it had
been operated as an unaffiliated entity) appearing in the Prospectus, which is a
part of this Registration Statement.

         We also consent to the reference to us under the headings "Selected
Financial Data" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP





Baltimore, Maryland
December 2, 2002
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4372 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, as the Barry G. Miller Post Office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2016 

Mr. COLLINS of New York (for himself, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. 

DONOVAN, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. REED, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. KING of New 

York, Ms. MENG, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. JEFFRIES, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mrs. 

CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. NADLER, Mr. TONKO, Ms. 

CLARKE of New York, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. 

ISRAEL, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. SERRANO, Miss RICE of New 

York, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. HANNA, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. KATKO, and Ms. 

STEFANIK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, as 

the Barry G. Miller Post Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BARRY G. MILLER POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 15 Rochester Street, Bergen, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4372 IH

1 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Barry 

2 G. Miller Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Barry G. Miller Post 

7 Office’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Brenda Modes, Inc., Respondent, and Arcola Fabrics Corp., Appellant. (Special Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of the Arbitration between Arcola Fabrics Corp., Appellant, and Brenda Modes, Inc., Respondent. (Special Proceeding No. 2.)

—An arbitration award, determining that appellant completed deliveries of merchandise under contracts of purchase and sale, has been vacated. Appellant took the position before the arbitrators that, to the extent that it did not forward the full quantity specified, the nondelivery thereof was expressly waived or acceptance refused after tender. These were questions that were properly within the submission for the arbitrators to decide. The objections to the award are based rather upon the theory that it was contrary to the evidence before the arbitrators, a question on which the court cannot pass, than on the ground "that a mutual, final and definite award upon the subject-matter submitted was not made.” (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462, subd. 4.) The order appealed from vacating the award and the order denying appellant’s cross motion to confirm the award are unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the award confirmed. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J,, Dore, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of cancellation.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) intends to cancel all work on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed Wheatgrass Ridge Wind Project on the Fort Hall Indian Reservation, Idaho.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. B. J. Howerton, Environmental Services Manager, telephone (503) 231-6749.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The BIA is canceling work on this EIS because the proponent of the Wheatgrass Ridge Wind Project, the Wheatgrass Ridge Wind, LLC., has formally withdrawn the proposal. The notice of intent to prepare the EIS, which included a description of the proposed action, was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on June 2, 2011 (76 FR 31975). The Draft EIS had not been published.                

Dated: April 3, 2012.

Donald E. Laverdure,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2012-10080 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P
#### John Spry *Lumber*Company, Appellee, v. Patrick K. Hardin et al., on appeal of Patrick K. Hardin, Appellant.

Gen. No. 18,651.

*Reoeivebs*— necessity *of bond.*A court of chancery is powerless to appoint a receiver without first requiring the complainant to give a bond as required by statute, unless the order of appointment discloses that for good cause shown, upon notice and full hearing, the chancellor is of opinion that the giving of such bond should be dispensed with.

Interlocutory appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Chaeles A. McDonald, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1912.

Reversed.

Opinion filed August 12, 1912.

*87William A. Rogan, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Mr. Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver, entered in the. Superior Court in a proceeding in equity instituted by appellee against the appellant, Patrick K. Hardin, and others, to set aside certain alleged fraudulent conveyances and transfers of property, and for discovery, injunction and the appointment of a receiver. The order appointing a receiver on April 22, 1912, is, as follows:

> “On motion of solicitors for complainant herein and on verified bill of complaint herein, it is ordered by the court that John R. Owen be and hereby is appointed receiver for the property, assets and effects of whatsoever kind or nature there may be, belonging to said Patrick K. Hardin, upon said receiver filing bond in the sum of Five Hundred ($500.00) Dollars, with surety to be approved by the Court.”

Section 1 of an act concerning the appointment and discharge of receivers provides, as follows:

> “That before any receiver shall be appointed the party making the application shall give bond to the adverse party in such penalty as the court or judge may order and with security to be approved by the court or judge conditioned to pay all damages including reasonable attorney’s fees sustained by reason of the appointment and acts of such receiver, in case the appointment of such receiver is revoked or set aside; *pro*vided, that bond need not be required, when for good cause shown, and upon notice and full hearing, the court is of opinion that a receiver ought to be appointed without such bond.” Rev. Stat., 1911, 167.

It has been repeatedly held that a court of chancery presuming to act upon the authority of this section of the statute is powerless to appoint a receiver without first requiring the complainant to give a bond as re*88quired by said section of tbe statute, unless tbe order of appointment discloses tbat for good cause shown, upon notice and full bearing, tbe chancellor is of opinion tbat tbe giving of such bond should be dispensed with. Watson v. Cudney, 144 Ill. App. 624; Staar v. Koon, 145 Ill. App. 341; Ayres v. The Graham Steamship Coal & Lumber Co., 150 Ill. App. 137; Aevermann v. Rizek, 160 Ill. App. 648.

It follows tbat tbe receiver was improvidently appointed and tbat tbe order appealed from must be and is reversed.

*Order reversed.*
Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Pumping

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total Daily Total

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS In Acre Feet

Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss (4.33) Loss (4.33) Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-18 0 4 0 0 0 4 13 4 0 17 0 0 0 17 9 17 3,025 2,705 5,731 6,001 5,366 11,367

2-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 17 3,480 2,724 6,204 6,902 5,404 12,306

3-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 17 3,188 2,720 5,908 6,324 5,395 11,719

4-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 17 3,630 2,721 6,351 7,200 5,397 12,597

5-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 17 3,095 2,710 5,805 6,139 5,375 11,514

6-Feb-18 0 0 4 0 4 0 17 4 0 0 3 0 3 0 11 17 3,176 2,728 5,904 6,299 5,411 11,710

7-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 17 3,763 2,731 6,494 7,464 5,417 12,881

8-Feb-18 0 4 4 0 4 4 21 8 0 17 3 0 3 17 14 35 3,486 2,722 6,208 6,915 5,399 12,314

9-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 35 3,592 2,717 6,310 7,125 5,390 12,515

10-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 35 3,239 2,725 5,964 6,424 5,405 11,829

11-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 35 3,170 2,726 5,896 6,287 5,407 11,694

12-Feb-18 0 0 8 0 8 0 29 8 0 0 5 0 5 0 19 35 1,737 2,726 4,464 3,446 5,408 8,854

13-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 35 238 879 1,117 473 1,743 2,216

14-Feb-18 0 4 0 0 0 4 29 12 0 17 0 0 0 17 19 52 1,826 1,813 3,639 3,622 3,596 7,218

15-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 52 1,561 1,804 3,365 3,097 3,578 6,675

16-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 52 1,397 1,811 3,208 2,770 3,593 6,363

17-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 52 1,138 1,821 2,959 2,257 3,612 5,869

18-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 52 923 1,824 2,747 1,830 3,618 5,448

19-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 52 198 879 1,077 392 1,744 2,136

20-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 52 0 871 871 0 1,728 1,728

21-Feb-18 0 0 0 4 0 4 29 16 0 0 0 3 0 3 19 55 408 871 1,279 809 1,727 2,536

22-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 55 618 873 1,491 1,226 1,731 2,957

23-Feb-18 0 0 1 0 1 0 30 16 0 0 1 0 1 0 20 55 1,062 872 1,934 2,106 1,730 3,836

24-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 55 1,049 872 1,921 2,081 1,730 3,811

25-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 55 623 872 1,495 1,235 1,730 2,965

26-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 55 782 875 1,657 1,551 1,736 3,287

27-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 55 2,778 876 3,655 5,511 1,738 7,249

28-Feb-18 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 55 4,349 873 5,222 8,626 1,731 10,357

Total 0 12 17 4 17 16 0 0 0 52 11 3 11 55 20 55 57,531 51,343 108,874 114,112 101,839 215,951

CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

FEBRUARY 2018

DATE

Banks Tracy Combined Banks Tracy Combined