alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

Bremen

Hamburg

Berlin

Sheffield

London

Leeds

Bremen

Hannover

Frankfurt

Paris

Stuttgart

Brussels

Amsterdam

Rotterdam

Hamburg

Prague

Berlin

Leipzig

Dresden

Copenhagen

Kaliningrad

Poznan

Wroclaw

Lodz

Warsaw

Krakow L'viv

Vilnius

NORDRHEINWESTFALEN

BADENWURTTEMBERG

HESSEN

BREMEN

NIEDERSACHSEN

THÜRINGEN

HAMBURG

SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIN

RHEINLANDPFALZ

SAARLAND

BAYERN

BERLIN

BRANDENBURG

SACHSENANHALT

SACHSEN

MECKLENBURGVORPOMMERN

NORTH SEA

BALTIC SEA

BELGIUM

BELARUS

LATVIA

RUSSIA

FRANCE

UNITED

KINGDOM

GERMANY

POLAND

DENMARK SWEDEN

LITHUANIA

UKRAINE

CZECH

REPUBLIC

NETHERLANDS

Konrad-Grodziec-Wartowice

Lena-Nowy Kosciól

Lubin-Sieroszowice

Richelsdorf

Tiefscholle Osterhausen

Graustein

Mansfeld Spremberg

Sangerhausen

Feld Heldrungen (Thuringen) Weisswasser

0° 10° E 20° E

55° N

50° N

0 100 200 300 400 KILOMETERS

0 100 200 MILES

EXPLANATION

Sediment-hosted stratabound copper 

 permissive tract

150rfCu0006 - Baltic Basin

150rfCu0004 - Dolny Slask (Lower Silesia)

150rfCu0001 - Hercynian-Thuringian Basin

150rfCu0002 - Hessian Depression

150rfCu0007 - Jutland Peninsula

150rfCu0003 - North Sea

150rfCu0005 - Spremberg-Wittenberg

Sediment-hosted stratabound copper deposit

Sediment-hosted stratabound copper prospect

AUSTRIA

SLOVAKIA

HUNGARY

RUSSIA

FRANCE

ITALY

GERMANY POLAND

CZECH

REPUBLIC

EAST

GERMANY

WEST

GERMANY

NORTH SEA

BALTIC

SEA

10° E 20° E

54° N

48° N

EXPLANATION

East Germany

West Germany

Silesia

Political boundaries from U.S. Department of State (2009).

WGS 1984 UTM Zone 33N Projection .

Central meridian, 17° E., latitude of origin, 0°.

Figure 12. Map showing final permissive tracts delineated for reduced-facies sediment-hosted stratabound copper deposits in 

the Southern Permian Basin, northern Europe. Inset shows the location of the former East Germany and West Germany, as well 

as the province of Silesia.
ex_130911.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


 


STEPHEN M. MERRICK


DEER PARK, ILLINOIS


 


 


 


November 27, 2018


 


Board of Directors of


CTI Industries Corporation


c/o Jeffrey S. Hyland, President


 


 


Gentlemen:


 


After 42 years of service to our Company, I have concluded that it is time for me to retire as Chief Executive Officer. Accordingly, I am tendering my resignation as Chief Executive Officer of CTI Industries Corporation to be effective as of the close of business November 30, 2018.


 


It is not my intention to resign as a member of the Board of Directors of CTI. Further, as we have discussed, I understand that the Board of Directors wishes for me to continue as General Counsel and Secretary for CTI and I am willing to continue in those capacities and to provide such service to our Company as may be requested from time to time.


 


With Best Regards,


 


/s/ Stephen M. Merrick


Stephen M. Merrick
§ 661.310 Under what limited conditions may a Local Board directly be a provider of core services, intensive services, or training services, or act as a One-Stop Operator? ( a ) A Local Board may not directly provide core services, or intensive services, or be designated or certified as a One-Stop operator, unless agreed to by the chief elected official and the Governor.
( b ) A Local Board is prohibited from providing training services, unless the Governor grants a waiver in accordance with the provisions in WIA section 117(f)(1). The waiver shall apply for not more than one year. The waiver may be renewed for additional periods, but for not more than one additional year at a time.
( c ) The restrictions on the provision of core, intensive, and training services by the Local Board, and designation or certification as One-Stop operator, also apply to staff of the Local Board. (WIA sec. 117(f)(1) and (f)(2).)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 79 (Monday, April 25, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22912-22913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9960]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs And Border Protection


Notice of Revocation of Customs Broker License

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.

ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection regulations 
(19 CFR 111.51(b)), the following Customs broker license and all 
associated permits are revoked with prejudice.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    License <greek-
               Name                       i>            Issuing port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.F.T.C., Inc.....................           11373  Miami
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 22913]]

    Dated: April 14, 2011.
Allen Gina,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2011-9960 Filed 4-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
### subpart i—multilateral and regional development programs
§ 702.131 Representation of parties in interest. ( a ) Claimants, employers and insurance carriers may be represented in any proceeding under the Act by an attorney or other person previously authorized in writing by such claimant, employer or carrier to so act.
( b ) The Secretary shall annually publish a list of individuals who are disqualified from representing claimants under the Act. Individuals on this list are not authorized to represent claimants under the Act subject to the provision of section 31(b)(2)(C) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 931(b)(2)(C), and they shall not have their representation fee approved as provided in section 28(e), 33 U.S.C. 928(e).
( c ) Individuals shall be included on the list mentioned in (b) if the Secretary determines, after proceedings under §§ 702.432(b) through 702.434, that such individual: ( 1 ) Has been convicted (without regard to pending appeal) of any crime in connection with the representation of a claimant under this Act or any workers' compensation statute;
( 2 ) Has engaged in fraud in connection with the presentation of a claim under this or any workers' compensation statute, including, but not limited to, knowingly making false representations, concealing or attempting to conceal material facts with respect to a claim, or soliciting or otherwise procuring false testimony;
( 3 ) Has been prohibited from representing claimants before any other workers' compensation agency for reasons of professional misconduct which are similar in nature to those which would be grounds for disqualification under this section; or
( 4 ) Has accepted fees for representing claimants under the Act which were not approved, or which were in excess of the amount approved pursuant to section 28 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 928.
[38 FR 26861, Sept. 26, 1973, as amended at 50 FR 394, Jan. 3, 1985]
§ 681.530 What are positive social and civic behaviors? Positive social and civic behaviors are outcomes of leadership opportunities, which are incorporated by local programs as part of their menu of services. Positive social and civic behaviors focus on areas that may include the following: ( a ) Positive attitudinal development;
( b ) Self-esteem building;
( c ) Openness to work with individuals from diverse backgrounds;
( d ) Maintaining healthy lifestyles, including being alcohol- and drug-free;
( e ) Maintaining positive social relationships with responsible adults and peers, and contributing to the well-being of one's community, including voting;
( f ) Maintaining a commitment to learning and academic success;
( g ) Avoiding delinquency; and
( h ) Positive job attitudes and work skills.
### §5911. Administration of demilitarization programs

#### (a) Funding

(1) In recognition of the direct contributions to the national security interests of the United States of the activities specified in section 5902 of this title, funds transferred under sections 108 and 109 of Public Law 102–229 (105 Stat. 1708) are authorized to be made available to carry out this chapter. Of the amount available to carry out this chapter—

(A) not more than $40,000,000 may be made available for programs referred to in section 5902(b)(4) of this title relating to demilitarization of defense industries;

(B) not more than $15,000,000 may be made available for programs referred to in section 5902(b)(6) of this title relating to military-to-military contacts;

(C) not more than $25,000,000 may be made available for joint research development programs pursuant to section 5931 of this title;

(D) not more than $10,000,000 may be made available for the study, assessment, and identification of nuclear waste disposal activities by the former Soviet Union in the Arctic region;

(E) not more than $25,000,000 may be made available for Project PEACE; and

(F) not more than $10,000,000 may be made available for the Volunteers Investing in Peace and Security (VIPS) program under chapter 89 1 of title 10.

(2), (3) Omitted.

#### (b) Omitted

(Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title XIV, §1421, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2564.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Sections 108 and 109 of Public Law 102–229 (105 Stat. 1708), referred to in subsec. (a)(1), are not classified to the Code.

Chapter 89 of title 10, referred to in subsec. (a)(1)(F), was repealed by Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1061(a)(1), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 442.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 1421 of Pub. L. 102–484. Subsec. (a)(2) and (3) of section 1421 of Pub. L. 102–484 amended section 221 of Pub. L. 102–228, which was set out in a note under section 2551 of this title and was repealed by Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title XIII, §1351(1), Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3606. Subsec. (b) of section 1421 of Pub. L. 102–484 amended sections 108 and 109 of Pub. L. 102–229, which are not classified to the Code.

1 See References in Text note below.
### §4860. Reimbursement of Department of the Treasury

The Secretary of State shall reimburse the appropriate appropriations account of the Department of the Treasury out of funds appropriated pursuant to section 4851(a)(1) of this title for the actual costs incurred by the United States Secret Service, as agreed to by the Secretary of the Treasury, for providing protection for the spouses of foreign heads of state during fiscal years 1986 and 1987.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title IV, §411, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 867.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of the functions, personnel, assets, and obligations of the United States Secret Service, including the functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 381, 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of November 25, 2002, as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the
Companies) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason W. Bixby, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Companies.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ Jason W. Bixby                                  
|Jason W. Bixby Chief Financial Officer March 1, 2007
### §10505. Designation of embassy anti-corruption points of contact

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of State shall annually designate an anti-corruption point of contact at the United States diplomatic post to each country identified pursuant to section 10502(b) of this title, or which the Secretary otherwise determines is in need of such a point of contact. The point of contact shall be the chief of mission or the chief of mission's designee.

#### (b) Responsibilities

Each anti-corruption point of contact designated under subsection (a) shall be responsible for enhancing coordination and promoting the implementation of a whole-of-government approach among the relevant Federal departments and agencies undertaking efforts to—

(1) promote good governance in foreign countries; and

(2) enhance the ability of such countries—

(A) to combat public corruption; and

(B) to develop and implement corruption risk assessment tools and mitigation strategies.

#### (c) Training

The Secretary of State shall implement appropriate training for anti-corruption points of contact designated under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. E, title LIV, §5406, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 947.)
#### In the Matter of Edgar H. Hazelwood, an Attorney.

The acceptance of a retainer, against the interests of the estate for which respondent was acting as attorney, was a grave breach of his professional obligations. Had not the executrix been restored to her original position by the repayment of all the estate funds, respondent would be subject to the penalty of suspension. However, in view of his deposit to the credit of the executrix of $1,207.60 — the full subject-matter distributed by respondent in the alleged settlement — a payment made with large loss to himself—showing respondent’s efforts in good faith to make full amends; and having regard also to the public criticism which he has received, and the warning for the future which this indiscretion will furnish, no further penalty or discipline will be imposed. Present—Jenks, P. J., Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.; Burr, J., taking no part.
EXHIBIT 99
----------




                       SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
                       -------------------------



     The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or any other securities law:

     Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of CARLYLE REAL ESTATE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP - XIV.




By: /s/  H. Rigel Barber                By: /s/  Gailen J. Hull
    ----------------------------            ---------------------------
    H. Rigel Barber                         Gailen J. Hull
    Principal Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer and
                                            Principal Accounting Officer
§ 702.315 Conclusion of conference; agreement on all matters with respect to the claim. ( a ) Following an informal conference at which agreement is reached on all issues, the district director must (within 10 days after conclusion of the conference), embody the agreement in a memorandum or within 30 days issue a formal compensation order, to be filed and served in accordance with § 702.349. If either party requests that a formal compensation order be issued, the district director must, within 30 days of such request, prepare, file, and serve such order in accordance with § 702.349. Where the problem was of such nature that it was resolved by telephone discussion or by exchange of written correspondence, the district director must prepare a memorandum or order setting forth the terms agreed upon and notify the parties either by telephone or in writing, as appropriate. In either instance, when the employer or carrier has agreed to pay, reinstate or increase monetary compensation benefits, or to restore or appropriately change medical care benefits, such action must be commenced immediately upon becoming aware of the agreement, and without awaiting receipt of the memorandum or the formal compensation order.
( b ) Where there are several conferences or discussions, the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section do not apply until the last conference. The district director must, however, prepare and place in his administrative file a short, succinct memorandum of each preceding conference or discussion.
[80 FR 12930, Mar. 12, 2015]
#### § 702.215 Notice; how given.

Notice must be effected by delivering it to the individual designated to receive such notices at the physical or electronic address designated by the employer. Notice may be given to the district director by submitting a copy of the form supplied by OWCP to the district director, or orally in person or by telephone.

[80 FR 12929, Mar. 12, 2015]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laidlaw International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officers knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. Date: January 10, 2005/s/ Kevin E. BensonName: Kevin E. BensonTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Douglas A. CartyName: Douglas A. CartyTitle: Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as a part of this report or on a separate disclosure document
### §1196. Repealed. June 28, 1955, ch. 196, 69 Stat. 187

Section, acts Apr. 5, 1906, ch. 1366, §10, 34 Stat. 102; May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §11, 43 Stat. 142, required consular officers to affix official fee stamps to documents in the performance of any consular or notarial act.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Michael C. Azar, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Oakmont Acquisition Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business
issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in
this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 14, 2007



/s/ Michael C. AzarMichael C. AzarPresident, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40641 Conference Calendar

__________________ CLEMMIE R. WICKWARE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JAMES A. COLLINS ET AL., Defendants, K. KUYKENDALL, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:92-CV-73

- - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Clemmie R. Wickware filed an appeal from the magistrate judge's denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction; nevertheless, he has failed to brief this issue. Issues which are not briefed are waived. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Wickware argues that the magistrate judge erred in dismissing his claims against the defendants other than Dr. Kuykendall. As these issues do not concern the denial of theNo. 95-40641 -2- preliminary injunction, we lack jurisdiction to consider them. Lakedreams v. Taylor , 932 F.2d 1103, 1107 (5th Cir. 1991); 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). This appeal is frivolous and is DISMISSED as such. 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. Wickware previously has been warned by this court that he may be sanctioned for filing further frivolous pleadings. Accordingly, Wickware is barred from filing any pro se , in forma pauperis , civil appeal in this court, or any pro se , in forma pauperis , initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court's jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court or of this court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to Wickware, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION IMPOSED.