alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 720.19

 721.04

 721.09

 721.15

 721.20

 721.26

 721.53

 723.45

 721.99

 722.23

 722.62

 722.94

 724.08

 726.06

 734.84

 732.72

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,193

 1,223

 1,225

 1,228

 1,229

 1,232

 1,242

 1,313

 1,259

 1,268

 1,282

 1,294

 1,337

 1,414

 1,787

 1,693

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+30

+2

+3

+1

+3

+10

+71

-54

+9

+14

+12

+43

+77

+373

-94

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

15

1

2

1

2

5

36

-27

5

7

6

22

39

228

27

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 40

 74

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2018

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +500 369 0 114

ACRE-FEET +500 732 0 226

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 226

 226

 1,193

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
§ 686.800 How do Job Corps centers and service providers become involved in their local communities? ( a ) The director of each Job Corps center must ensure the establishment and development of mutually beneficial business and community relationships and networks. Establishing and developing networks includes relationships with: ( 1 ) Local and distant employers;
( 2 ) Applicable one-stop centers and Local WDBs:
( 3 ) Entities offering apprenticeship opportunities, including registered apprenticeships, and youth programs;
( 4 ) Labor-management organizations and local labor organizations;
( 5 ) Employers and contractors that support national training programs and initiatives; and
( 6 ) Community-based organizations, non-profit organizations, and intermediaries providing workforce development-related services.
( b ) Each Job Corps center also must establish and develop relationships with members of the community in which it is located. Members of the community must be informed of the projects of the Job Corps center and changes in the rules, procedures, or activities of the center that may affect the community. Events of mutual interest to the community and the Job Corps center must be planned to create and maintain community relations and community support.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

p1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

145441 & (70)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145441

COA: 302146 

Wayne CC: 10-007622-FC 

WILLIE BERNARD WRIGHT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 17, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED.
================================================================================


                                  Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Keith Smith, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Driftwood Ventures,  Inc., for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information  contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Driftwood Ventures, Inc.

Date:  March 27, 2007

                                               /s/ Keith Smith
                                               ---------------------------
                                               Keith Smith
                                               Treasurer and Director
                                               (Principal Financial Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer)
### [§214. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, §1119(b), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 491]

Section, added Pub. L. 87–866, §6(b), Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1147; amended Pub. L. 97–424, title I, §126(d), Jan. 6, 1983, 96 Stat. 2115, related to public lands development roads and trails.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 6,437

 5,749

 4,643

 4,058

 3,335

 4,521

 4,594

 4,054

 4,390

 4,784

 3,318

 4,588

 3,422

 3,824

 4,097

 3,684

 3,407

 4,134

 3,919

 3,958

 3,794

 3,400

 4,324

 4,269

 3,886

 3,653

 4,441

 3,283

 3,517

 4,644

 3,598

 105,078

 105,939

 106,104

 105,209

 103,804

 101,782

 100,988

 100,303

 99,139

 98,352

 97,980

 96,233

 95,780

 94,242

 93,162

 92,396

 91,276

 89,949

 89,379

 88,633

 87,962

 87,168

 86,039

 85,845

 85,608

 85,020

 84,239

 84,246

 83,153

 82,336

 82,631

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 14,952

 29,904

 44,856

 59,808

 74,760

 89,712

 104,664

 119,616

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2017 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: January 10, 2018

 111,515

 111,688

 110,747

 109,267

 107,139

 106,303

 105,582

 104,357

 103,529

 103,136

 101,298

 100,821

 99,202

 98,066

 97,259

 96,080

 94,683

 94,083

 93,298

 92,591

 91,756

 90,568

 90,363

 90,114

 89,494

 88,673

 88,680

 87,529

 86,670

 86,980

 86,229

 1,285,048

 1,270,096

 1,255,144

 1,240,192

 1,225,240

 1,210,288

 1,195,336

 1,180,384

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,267,000

 3,282,000

 3,297,000

 3,312,000

 3,327,000

 3,342,000

 3,357,000

 3,372,000

 0.0356

 0.0712

 0.1068

 0.1424

 0.1780

 0.2136

 0.2492

 0.2848

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 110,608
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 726.17

 726.23

 726.30

 726.36

 726.43

 726.48

 726.53

 726.52

 726.55

 726.65

 726.76

 726.86

 726.96

 727.06

 727.20

 727.35

 727.50

 727.65

 727.79

 727.93

 728.04

 728.11

 728.18

 728.24

 728.31

 728.36

 728.42

 728.45

 728.51

 728.59

 1,419

 1,421

 1,424

 1,426

 1,429

 1,431

 1,433

 1,433

 1,434

 1,438

 1,442

 1,446

 1,450

 1,454

 1,460

 1,466

 1,473

 1,479

 1,484

 1,490

 1,495

 1,498

 1,500

 1,503

 1,506

 1,508

 1,510

 1,511

 1,514

 1,517

STORAGE

+2

+2

+3

+2

+3

+2

+2

+0

+1

+4

+4

+4

+4

+4

+6

+6

+7

+6

+5

+6

+5

+3

+2

+3

+3

+2

+2

+1

+3

+3

CHANGE

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

0

1

2

2

2

2

2

3

3

4

3

3

3

3

2

1

2

2

1

1

1

2

2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2020

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +100 56 0 0

ACRE-FEET +100 111 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 1,417

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Know Your Rights

              																	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Know Your Rights : What a Working Wife Should Know About Her Legal Rights*,										1965,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/304,			accessed on September 5, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Koyukuk/Nowitna National Wildlife Refuge 

P.O. Box 287 

Galena, AK 99741 

Telephone: 907-656-1231 

Fax: 907-656-1708 

http://koyukuk.fws.gov 

http://nowitna.gov 

 

 

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

Region 7, Alaska 

1011 East Tudor Rd. MS-231 

Anchorage, AK 99503-6199 

Telephone: 907-786-3357 

Fax: 907-786-3965 

http://alaska.fws.gov 

 

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 

1-800-344-WILD 

http;//www.fws.gov 

 

July 2009
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3194

___________

Christopher Lee Prosser, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Mary Weeks; Arthur Sommer; Emile * Eastern District of Missouri.

Schneider; Unknown Golden; Unknown *

Rushing; Mark Houston; Dallas * [UNPUBLISHED]

McDowell; Michael Jones; Raymond *

Stock, *

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 11, 1997

Filed: March 25, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM. 

Missouri inmate Christopher L. Prosser was convicted of second-degree murder

for the death of his live-in girlfriend’s two year old daughter, Rockie Krieb. He now
The HONORABLE CATHERINE D. PERRY, United States District Judge for 1

the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

appeals various district court orders, primarily the court’s grant of summary judgment 1

dismissing Prosser’s § 1983 damage claims against St. Louis County police and animal

control officers and private citizens involved in the search and seizures accompanying

his arrest. After careful review of the record and the briefs, we affirm for the reasons

stated in the district court’s thorough Memorandum and Order dated July 11, 1996, its

earlier protective orders, and its Order taxing costs dated August 14, 1996. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B. 

We further conclude that Prosser and his attorney, Richard L. Beaver, have

pursued a vexatious and frivolous appeal. After the district court denied Prosser leave

to appeal in forma pauperis on the ground that “an appeal from this matter would not

be taken in good faith,” attorney Beaver filed a meritless fifty-page brief and twentyfive page reply brief. We therefore order Prosser and Beaver to show cause within

twenty days why we should not award against them, jointly and severally, double costs

together with appellees’ attorney’s fees on appeal. See Rule 38 of the Federal Rules

of Appellate Procedure; 28 U.S.C. §§ 1912, 1927; Slack v. St. Louis County Govt.,

919 F.2d 98, 100 (8th Cir. 1990); Anselmo v. Manufacturers Life Ins. Co., 771 F.2d

417, 421 (8th Cir. 1985). 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Eric MACIAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40051.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

John Eric Macias, Talladega, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Larry Chris lies, appointed to represent John Eric Macias, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Macias has not filed a response to the motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Agency Report Form Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC).

ACTION: Request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provision of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35), agencies are required to publish a Notice in the Federal 
Register notifying the public that the Agency is preparing an 
information collection request for OMB review and approval and to 
request public review and comment on the submission. Comments are being 
solicited on the need for the information; the accuracy of the Agency's 
burden estimate; the quality, practical utility and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and on ways to minimize the reporting 
burden, including automated collection techniques and uses of other 
forms of technology. The proposed form under review, OMB control number 
3420-0023, is summarized below.

DATES: Comments must be received within 60 calendar days of publication 
of this notice.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form and the request for review 
prepared for submission to OMB may be obtained from the Agency 
Submitting Officer. Comments on the form should be submitted to the 
Agency Submitting Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Bruce 
I. Campbell, Record Management Officer, Overseas Private Investment 
Corporation, 1100 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20527; (202) 
336-8563.

Summary Form Under Review

    Type of Request: Revised form.
    Title: Self Monitoring Questionnaire for Investment Funds' Sub-
Projects.
    Form Number: OPIC-217.
    Frequency of Use: Annually for duration of project.
    Type of Respondents: Business or other institution (except farms); 
individuals.
    Description of Affected Public: U.S. companies or citizens 
investing overseas.
    Reporting Hours: 8.5 hours per project.
    Number of Responses: 189 per year.
    Federal Cost: $12,916.
    Authority for Information Collection: Sections 231, 234(a), 239(d), 
and 240A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as amended.
    Abstract (Needs and Uses): The questionnaire is completed by OPIC-
assisted investors annually. The questionnaire allows OPIC's assessment 
of effects of OPIC-assisted projects on the U.S. economy and 
employment, as well as on the environment and economic development 
abroad.

    Dated: September 20, 2004.
Eli Landy,
Senior Counsel, Administrative Affairs, Department of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 04-21357 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25207]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10150]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 
as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following 
meeting:

    Name: Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral and Economic 
Sciences (<greek-i>1171).
    Date/Time: May 17, 2012; 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.; May 18, 2012; 
8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, 
Stafford I, Room 1235, Arlington, VA 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Ms. Lisa Jones, Office of the Assistant 
Director, Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Room 905, 
Arlington, Virginia 22230, 703-292-8700.
    Summary of Minutes: May be obtained from contact person listed 
above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation on major goals and policies pertaining 
to Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences Directorate programs and 
activities.
    Agenda: Agenda Topics (order of discussion is subject to 
change).
    Updates and discussions on continuing activities:

<bullet> Discussion with NSF Director and Deputy Director
<bullet> SBE Advisory Committee--Subcommittee activities
<bullet> SMA Committee of Visitors (COV) Report
<bullet> NSF INSPIRE and I-Corps Initiatives
<bullet> Government-wide Big Data Initiative
<bullet> SBE data-related initiatives
<bullet> Innovation in SBE/NCSES
<bullet> NSF Merit Review Criteria
<bullet> On the Horizon

     Dated: April 24, 2012.
 Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2012-10150 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Larry J. Matheson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Acorn Holding Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisannual report is being prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); andc. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the small business issuer’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financialreporting. 6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regardto significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.Date: October 31, 2005              /s/ Larry J. Matheson   The person performing the functions of   Chief Financial Officer