alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMeasurement of Xenon Viscosity as a Function of Low Temperature and PressureThe measurement of xenon gas viscosity at low temperatures (175-298 K) and low pressures (350 torr-760 torr) has been performed in support of Hall Thruster testing at NASA Lewis Research Center. The measurements were taken using the capillary flow technique. Viscosity measurements were repeatable to within 3%. The results in this paper are in agreement with data from Hanley and Childs and suggest that the data from Clarke and Smith is approximately 2% low. There are no noticeable pressure effects on xenon absolute viscosity for the pressure range from 350 torr to 760 torr.Document ID19980219329Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypePreprint (Draft being sent to journal)AuthorsGrisnik, Stanley P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1998Subject CategoryThermodynamics And Statistical PhysicsReport/Patent NumberE-11244AIAA Paper 98-3498NAS 1.15:208409NASA/TM-1998-208409Meeting InformationMeeting: PropulsionLocation: Cleveland, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 12, 1998End Date: July 15, 1998Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Society for Electrical Engineers,American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 632-1B-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980219329.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### SUBCHAPTER XLII—QUAPAW TRIBE: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
Kaz Norvaisas 333 Docket Number F AA 2015

- 0520 Aircraft #1 Quadcopter **PHANTOM 2 W**

**eight (w Battery)** 1000g **Hover A**  **ccuracy (Ready to Fly)**  Vertical : ± 0.8m ; Horizontal : ± 2.5m **Max Ya** **w Angular** 

**V elocity**  200°/s **Manufactur e**  DJI **Max Ascent / Descent Speed**  6m/ s **Max Flight Speed** 15m/s(Not Recommended) **Diagonal Length** 350mm **Useful Load** 300g **Flight Time** 25mins **Ta ke**  **- off**  **We ight**  1.3kg MAX **Operating Te**  **mperature**
- 10°C ~ 50°C **Supported Battery** DJIIntelligent Battery
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 330

 359

 357

 376

 359

 329

 324

 309

 309

 320

 335

 358

 405

 468

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 153

 161

 164

 165

 162

 159

 157

 158

 161

 171

 175

 164

 168

 180

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 211

 224

 227

 230

 226

 219

 219

 219

 214

 225

 236

 236

 240

 264

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStudy of a Simulation Tool to Determine Achievable Control Dynamics and Control Power Requirements with Perfect TrackingThis paper contains a study of two methods for use in a generic nonlinear simulation tool that could be used to determine achievable control dynamics and control power requirements while performing perfect tracking maneuvers over the entire flight envelope. The two methods are NDI (nonlinear dynamic inversion) and the SOFFT(Stochastic Optimal Feedforward and Feedback Technology) feedforward control structure. Equivalent discrete and continuous SOFFT feedforward controllers have been developed. These equivalent forms clearly show that the closed-loop plant model loop is a plant inversion and is the same as the NDI formulation. The main difference is that the NDI formulation has a closed-loop controller structure whereas SOFFT uses an open-loop command model. Continuous, discrete, and hybrid controller structures have been developed and integrated into the formulation. Linear simulation results show that seven different configurations all give essentially the same response, with the NDI hybrid being slightly different. The SOFFT controller gave better tracking performance compared to the NDI controller when a nonlinear saturation element was added. Future plans include evaluation using a nonlinear simulation.Document ID19980221026Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsOstroff, Aaron J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1998Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208699NASA/TM-1998-208699L-17767Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-21-61-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980221026.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
|   | 1. |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         |
|--------|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                     | India      Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
| Date:      July 14, 2009 | By:                                    | /s/Ram Mukunda                                                              |   |
|                     |                                   | Ram      Mukunda                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |
|                     |                                   | Chief      Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive    Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 714.11

 713.94

 713.73

 713.57

 713.41

 713.24

 713.09

 712.90

 712.71

 712.53

 712.24

 712.05

 711.74

 711.54

 711.23

 711.00

 710.67

 710.37

 710.05

 709.70

 709.32

 709.03

 708.61

 708.22

 707.86

 707.65

 707.78

 708.02

 708.14

 708.25

 708.47

 987

 981

 974

 969

 964

 959

 954

 948

 942

 937

 928

 923

 913

 907

 898

 891

 881

 872

 863

 853

 842

 834

 822

 811

 801

 795

 799

 806

 809

 812

 818

STORAGE

-4

-6

-7

-5

-5

-5

-5

-6

-6

-5

-9

-5

-10

-6

-9

-7

-10

-9

-9

-10

-11

-8

-12

-11

-10

-6

+4

+7

+3

+3

+6

CHANGE

3

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

0

2

0

2

0

1

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

2

4

2

2

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 5

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 5

 0

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 21, 2000

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -173 39 5 123

ACRE-FEET -173 77 10 244

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 10

OUTLET

TOTAL

 244

 254

 991

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
### **CHAPTER 9—ALLOTMENT OF INDIAN LANDS**

Sec.
331 to 333. Repealed.
334.
Allotments to Indians not residing on reservations.
335.
Extension of provisions as to allotments.
336.
Allotments to Indians making settlement.
337.
Allotments in national forests.
337a, 338.
Repealed.
339.
Tribes excepted from certain provisions.
340.
Extension of certain provisions.
341.
Power to grant rights-of-way not affected.
342.
Removal of Southern Utes to new reservation.
343.
Correction of errors in allotments and patents.
344.
Cancellation of allotment of unsuitable land.
344a.
Repealed.
345.
Actions for allotments.
346.
Proceedings in actions for allotments.
347.
Limitations of actions for lands patented in severalty under treaties.
348.
Patents to be held in trust; descent and partition.
348a.
Extension of trust period for Indians of Klamath River Reservation.
349.
Patents in fee to allottees.
350.
Surrender of patent, and selection of other land.
351.
Patents with restrictions for lots in villages in Washington.
352.
Cancellation of trust patents within power or reservoir sites.
352a.
Cancellation of patents in fee simple for allotments held in trust.
352b.
Partial cancellation; issuance of new trust patents.
352c.
Reimbursement of allottees or heirs for taxes paid on lands patented in fee before end of trust.
353.
Sections inapplicable to certain tribes.
354.
Lands not liable for debts prior to final patent.
355.
Laws applicable to lands of full-blooded members of Five Civilized Tribes.
356.
Allowance of undisputed claims of restricted allottees of Five Civilized Tribes.
357.
Condemnation of lands under laws of States.
358.
Repeal of statutory provisions relating to survey, classification, and allotments which provide for repayment out of Indian moneys.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 728.91

 731.16

 733.08

 734.98

 736.57

 738.06

 735.64

 733.25

 730.70

 727.94

 724.80

 726.10

 727.40

 728.60

 729.75

 730.76

 731.73

 731.53

 729.00

 727.36

 734.16

 738.40

 729.49

 727.08

 721.94

 722.60

 722.75

 721.64

 721.34

 720.52

 721.78

 1,530

 1,625

 1,709

 1,793

 1,866

 1,937

 1,823

 1,716

 1,605

 1,491

 1,365

 1,416

 1,468

 1,518

 1,566

 1,608

 1,649

 1,641

 1,534

 1,467

 1,756

 1,953

 1,555

 1,455

 1,257

 1,281

 1,287

 1,246

 1,235

 1,205

 1,251

STORAGE

+109

+95

+84

+84

+73

+71

-114

-107

-111

-114

-126

+51

+52

+50

+48

+42

+41

-8

-107

-67

+289

+197

-398

-100

-198

+24

+6

-41

-11

-30

+46

CHANGE

55

48

42

42

37

36

20

17

14

13

4

26

26

25

24

21

21

16

6

12

146

99

59

162

117

92

81

57

48

37

44

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 77

 71

 70

 70

 68

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 20

 60

 46

 0

 0

 260

 212

 217

 80

 78

 78

 54

 52

 21

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2017 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2017

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -170 1,447 0 1,534

ACRE-FEET -170 2,870 0 3,043

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,043

 3,043

 1,421

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
### SUBCHAPTER I—ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF RETIREMENT HOME
<PAGE>



                            LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                         Exhibit to Form 10 - Q

             (For the nine months ended September 30, 2003)

                        Exhibit Number (32.(a))

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary C. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gary C. Smith


Gary C. Smith
President and
Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003
### §1164. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–117, §4, Oct. 31, 1967, 81 Stat. 338, which related to claims by living enrollees or by the heirs or legatees of deceased enrollees for per capita shares, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of MagnaChip Semiconductor Corporation (the “**Company**”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “**Report**”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed inthe Report. 

Dated: March 18, 2011 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46178

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

THOMAS ROBERT PETERSEN ,
Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: January 16, 2019
Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Gooding County. Hon. John K. Butler , District Judge.
Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, affirmed

. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.
Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lo ri A. F l eming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge.

________________________________________________ PER CURIAM
Thomas Robert Petersen pleaded guilty to two counts of first degree murder , I.C. § 18

- 4003(d) . The district court imposed a determinate life sentence for each charge. Petersen filed
an Idaho Crimin al Rule 35 motion for correction of an illegal sentence, asserting that his sentence was illegal because he was denied the right to have counsel present at his pre

- sentence investigation interview ; his attorney did not tell him that he could refuse to part icipate in his pre

sentence investigation interview; significant changes occurred to his brain as he grew older,
whic h could be detected with an MRI; and his trial attorney told him that a life sentence meant a thirty

- year sentence. The district court den ied Petersen ’s motion, finding that Petersen ’s sentence was not illegal on the face of the record

. Petersen appeals.2 In State v. Clements , 148 Idaho 82, 87, 218 P.3d 1143, 1148 (2009), the Idaho Supreme Court held that the term “illegal sentence” un der Rule 35 is narrowly interpreted as a sentence that is illegal from the face of the record, i.e., does not involve significant questions of fact or require an evidentiary hearing. Rule 35 is a “narrow rule,” and because an illegal sentence may
be corre cted at any time, the authority conferred by Rule 35 should be limited to uphold the finality of judgments. State v. Farwell, 144 Idaho 732, 735, 170 P.3d 397, 400 (2007). Idaho Criminal Rule 35 is not a vehicle designed to reexamine the facts underlying the case to determine whether a sentence is illegal; rather, the rule only applies to a narrow category of cases in which the sentence imposes a penalty that is simply not authorized by law or where new evidence tends to show that the original sentence wa s excessive. Clements , 148 Idaho at 87, 218
P.3d at 1148. The record supports the district court’s finding that Petersen ’s sentence was not illegal. Therefore, the district court properly denied Petersen ’s motion. Accordingly, we conclude no abuse of discretion has been shown and the district court’s order denying Petersen ’s Rule 35
motion is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications.                    

*Date:*                         May 24, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         12:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3121, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Paul A. Amstad, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-7098,                         *pamstad@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 23, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-10335 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P