alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 7/29/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

REGINALD KEITH LONG, Petitioner - Appellant, vs. RONALD CHAMPION, and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Respondents - Appellees. No. 95-5234 (D.C. No. 94-C-170-BU) (N.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, KELLY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges. **
Mr. Long, an inmate appearing pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a certificate of probable cause and to appeal the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition. Although he raised fourteen grounds in his petition, on appeal he raises two grounds-- that he was denied due process and equal protection because his sentence of life without- 2 -

parole was imposed without conducting a sentencing proceeding as required by Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, §§ 701.7 and 701.10, and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to advise him that he was supposed to have a sentencing proceeding. See Aplt. Br. at 2 (Form A-11); R. doc. 1 at 10-C & 10-E. These grounds were included in a second state post-conviction application and were denied by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals based upon the failure to raise them in the first state post-conviction proceeding. R. doc. 12 ex. B (citing Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 1991). We construe Mr. Long’s application for a certificate of probable cause as an application for a certificate of appealability now required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). See
Lennox v. Evans , No. 96-6041, 1996 WL 343632 at *4 (10th Cir. June 24, 1996). The Application is DENIED for want of “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addition to the problem of procedural bar and lack of a showing of cause and prejudice, or factual innocence, Mr. Long has not overcome the transcript of the plea hearing that reflects a knowing and voluntary plea to life without parole based upon competent advice. See R. doc. 9 ex. B. APPEAL DISMISSED. Entered for the Court
Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*William E. Locke, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 71-296;

Fifth District —

October 1, 1973.

Robert E. Farrell, Deputy Defender, of Mt. Vernon, (Michael Q. Jones, Senior Law Student, of counsel,) for appellant.

Robert J. Hawkins, State’s Attorney, of Fairfield, for the People.

PER CURIAM.
§ 662.250 Where and to what extent must required One-Stop partners make core services available? ( a ) At a minimum, the core services that are applicable to the program of the partner under § 662.220, and that are in addition to the basic labor exchange services traditionally provided in the local area under the Wagner-Peyser program, must be made available at the comprehensive One-Stop center. These services must be made available to individuals attributable to the partner's program who seek assistance at the center. The adult and dislocated worker program partners are required to make all of the core services listed in § 662.240 available at the center in accordance with 20 CFR 663.100(b)(1).
( b ) The applicable core services may be made available by the provision of appropriate technology at the comprehensive One-Stop center, by co-locating personnel at the center, cross-training of staff, or through a cost reimbursement or other agreement between service providers at the comprehensive One-Stop center and the partner, as described in the MOU.
( c ) The responsibility of the partner for the provision of core services must be proportionate to the use of the services at the comprehensive One-Stop center by the individuals attributable to the partner's program. The specific method of determining each partner's proportionate responsibility must be described in the MOU.
( d ) For purposes of this part, individuals attributable to the partner's program may include individuals who are referred through the comprehensive One-Stop center and enrolled in the partner's program after the receipt of core services, who have been enrolled in the partner's program prior to receipt of the applicable core services at the center, who meet the eligibility criteria for the partner's program and who receive an applicable core service, or who meet an alternative definition described in the MOU.
( e ) Under the MOU, the provision of applicable core services at the center by the One-Stop partner may be supplemented by the provision of such services through the networks of affiliated sites and networks of One-Stop partners described in WIA section 134(c)(2).
### SUBCHAPTER XIV–A—KLAMATH TRIBE: RESTORATION OF FEDERAL SUPERVISION
### §925. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–723, §52(2), Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 847

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §525, 60 Stat. 1010, authorized Secretary to define active duty period of Reserve officers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal by Pub. L. 86–723 effective first day of first pay period which begins more than thirty days after Sept. 8, 1960, see Pub. L. 86–723, §56(a), Sept. 8, 1960, 74 Stat. 848.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 1,036.22

 1,036.37

 1,036.64

 1,036.78

 1,037.50

 1,038.72

 1,039.43

 1,039.79

 1,039.64

 1,039.75

 1,040.36

 1,041.75

 1,044.29

 1,048.49

 1,048.93

 1,048.53

 1,047.61

 1,046.39

 1,044.60

 1,043.18

 1,041.80

 1,041.60

 1,041.69

 1,040.98

 1,039.72

 1,040.27

 1,042.00

 1,042.32

 1,042.44

 3,693.2

 3,697.1

 3,704.1

 3,707.8

 3,726.6

 3,758.7

 3,777.5

 3,787.0

 3,783.1

 3,786.0

 3,802.1

 3,839.0

 3,907.1

 4,021.4

 4,033.5

 4,022.5

 3,997.3

 3,964.0

 3,915.4

 3,877.2

 3,840.3

 3,835.0

 3,837.4

 3,818.5

 3,785.2

 3,799.7

 3,845.7

 3,854.2

 3,857.4

STORAGE

-3.9

+3.9

+7.0

+3.7

+18.9

+32.1

+18.8

+9.5

-4.0

+2.9

+16.2

+36.9

+68.1

+114.4

+12.1

-11.0

-25.3

-33.3

-48.5

-38.2

-36.9

-5.3

+2.4

-18.9

-33.4

+14.6

+45.9

+8.6

+3.2

CHANGE

 13,958

 14,114

 13,247

 12,562

 19,268

 22,696

 16,890

 15,113

 12,650

 14,694

 22,723

 35,195

 49,763

 73,332

 39,925

 29,786

 23,499

 20,717

 16,402

 16,939

 17,016

 29,161

 32,418

 24,172

 20,947

 37,116

 54,464

 40,057

 40,882

INFLOW

 8,559

 11,556

 9,663

 8,981

 9,205

 6,487

 7,395

 10,243

 10,137

 10,014

 10,437

 11,481

 11,452

 8,899

 10,986

 11,201

 11,227

 11,331

 11,242

 11,283

 11,281

 10,982

 11,287

 11,459

 11,669

 11,610

 11,477

 11,496

 11,605

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 7,273

 584

 0

 1,723

 511

 0

 0

 0

 4,500

 3,164

 3,925

 5,051

 3,735

 6,771

 22,814

 24,132

 24,972

 26,113

 29,534

 24,914

 24,196

 20,312

 19,759

 22,218

 25,987

 17,851

 19,660

 24,155

 27,660

OUTLET

 100

 0

 31

 15

 46

 31

 31

 62

 16

 47

 218

 63

 262

 0

 24

 0

 32

 72

 95

 8

 133

 549

 165

 16

 109

 312

 173

 94

 0

C.F.S.

 .13

 .00

 .04

 .02

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .08

 .02

 .06

 .28

 .08

 .33

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .04

 .09

 .12

 .01

 .17

 .70

 .21

 .02

 .14

 .40

 .22

 .12

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .71

 .82

 1.14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .96

 1.33

 3.30

 3.18

 3.44

 .10

 .10

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .03

 1.07

 .67

 2.01

 .00

 .35

 2.03

 1.80

 .72

 2.11

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2000 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 14, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +160.5 779,706 304,645 0 391,514 2,704 3.45 25.96

ACRE-FEET +160,500 1,546,547 604,263 0 776,568 5,363

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 604,263

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 776,568

 1,380,831

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 25.96

JULY 1, 1999 54.68

 3,697.1

Table 3
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Carla Faucett, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Acorn Holding Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures asof a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the“Evaluation Date”); andc. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknessesin internal controls; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.February 9, 2006         By:       /s/ Carla Faucett Carla Faucett
### §6984. Authorization of appropriations

#### (a) Commercial law program

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Commerce to carry out the program described in section 6981(a) of this title such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2001, and each fiscal year thereafter.

#### (b) Labor law program

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Labor to carry out the program described in section 6981(b) of this title such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2001, and each fiscal year thereafter.

#### (c) Legal system and civil society rule of law program

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of State to carry out the program described in section 6981(c) of this title such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2001, and each fiscal year thereafter.

#### (d) Construction with other laws

Except as provided in this chapter, funds may be made available to carry out the purposes of this part notwithstanding any other provision of law.

(Pub. L. 106–286, div. B, title V, §514, Oct. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 906.)
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-200169) pertaining to the Foster Wheeler AG Omnibus Incentive Plan, AMEC Savings Related Share Option Scheme 2005, AMEC Restricted Share Plan and AMEC Performance Share Plan Amec Foster Wheeler plc of our report dated 26 March 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Amec Foster Wheeler plc, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Amec Foster Wheeler plc for the year ended 31 December 2014.

 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

London, England

14 April 2015

 

----
### §§212 to 214. Repealed. Pub. L. 98–621, §10(q), Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3381

Section 212, acts June 23, 1874, ch. 465, §1, 18 Stat. 251; Aug. 7, 1882, ch. 433, 22 Stat. 330; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309; 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §11(a), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2422, 54 Stat. 1236; 1953 Reorg. Plan No. 1, §5, eff. Apr. 11, 1953, 18 F.R. 2053, 67 Stat. 631; Oct. 17, 1979, Pub. L. 96–88, title V, §509(b), 93 Stat. 695, related to transfer to Saint Elizabeths Hospital of insane prisoners.

Section 213, acts June 23, 1874, ch. 465, §2, 18 Stat. 251; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309, related to accommodation of insane convicts in State asylums and compensation therefor.

Section 214, act June 23, 1874, ch. 465, §3, 18 Stat. 252, related to return of transferred insane convicts and prisoners to prison on restoration of their sanity.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1987, see section 12(b) of Pub. L. 98–621, set out as an Effective Date note under section 225 of this title.
#### Locust Farms Company, Appellant, v. Mary E. St. John, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. •
[Graphic omitted] Ahold

                                                      Press Release

                                                      Royal Ahold
                                                      Corporate Communications


                                               Date:  November 5, 2004
                                For more information: +31 75 659 57 20



Ahold closes transaction of Canica's stake in
ICA AB; extraordinary dividend of ICA AB paid

Zaandam, The Netherlands, November 5, 2004 -- Ahold today announced that it has
closed the transaction relating to the purchase of the 20% interest of Canica AS
in the Scandinavian joint venture ICA AB. Simultaneously, the sale of half of
this stake to ICA Forbundet Invest AB, the other joint venture partner, has been
completed. On October 25, 2004, Ahold had already announced that it had reached
agreement on the purchase of Canica's stake.

Furthermore, Ahold today announced that, in line with the announcement of
October 25, 2004, ICA AB has paid an extraordinary dividend of SEK 5.5 billion
(approximately EUR 606 million). This dividend was paid to Ahold and ICA
Forbundet in proportion to their final stake in ICA AB, respectively 60% and
40%.


Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.5720




                                                 Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                 P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                 The Netherlands
                                                 Phone:  +31 (0)75 659 5720
                                                 Fax:    +31 (0)75 659 8302
http://www.ahold.com
#### Emanuel Bloomfield, by Charles Bloomfield, His Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. The Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
<PAGE>32
                            LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                         Exhibit to Form 10 - Q

                 (For the six months ended June 30, 2002)

                        Exhibit Number (99.2)

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory D.
Friedman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gregory D. Friedman


Gregory D. Friedman
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              MARWICH II, LTD.
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2000, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Porath,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
Exhibit



Exhibit 10(b)






To: [PARTICIPANT NAME]


PARKER-HANNIFIN CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT (RSU-027DIBOD)


The Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of Parker-Hannifin Corporation (the “Company”) has awarded to you the following number of Restricted Stock Units under the Parker-Hannifin Corporation 2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and subject to the Parker-Hannifin Corporation Restricted Stock Unit Terms and Conditions (RSU-REC0818) (the “Terms and Conditions”):


Grant Date [Grant Date]
Number of RSUs [Number Granted]


Vesting Dates.  Except as otherwise provided in the Terms and Conditions, while you are an active full-time employee, units will vest in full on August 5, 2022.  The scheduled vesting date and amounts for this award are viewable by clicking on the Grant Date hyperlink on your Restricted Stock Unit Grant Information page on the Stock Incentive Plan Administrator’s web site.


Payment Dates.  The Restricted Stock Units will be paid to you in shares of Parker common stock on the vesting dates, except as otherwise provided in the Terms and Conditions.


Your Action Items.  Please take the following actions:


Before you accept your grant, click on the links below to review the Terms and Conditions, the Prospectus and the Plan Document.  This Award is subject to the terms of the Plan and administrative procedures the Committee may promulgate under it from time to time.  In the event of a conflict between this document, the Prospectus, and the Plan, the Plan document as well as any determinations made by the Committee, as authorized by the Plan document, shall govern.
Accept the Terms and Conditions and execute this Agreement by clicking on the “Accept” button below.  If you do not accept this Award Agreement prior to the initial vesting date, your Award will be forfeited, except in the event of your permanent disability or death prior to the initial vesting date.
Inform the Company of any changes in address or contact information, as necessary.  Refer to the section of the Terms and Conditions titled “Notification of Change in Personal Data” for instructions on how to provide notification to the Company.


Restricted Stock Unit Terms and Conditions (RSU-REC0818)
2016 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan


To view the most recent Annual Report, please click here.
To view the most recent Proxy Statement, please click here
To view the Prospectus, please click here.
U27
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Ore deposits of the Antler Peak quadrangle, Humboldt and 
Lander Counties, Nevada

#### Professional Paper 459-B

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 7**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 8**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 9**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 10**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 14**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 17**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 19**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Study Area



#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp459B 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: August 01, 2013 
15:06:28
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72
36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 09/06 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 06 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL