alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 678.420 What are the roles and responsibilities of the required one-stop partners? Each required partner must: ( a ) Provide access to its programs or activities through the one-stop delivery system, in addition to any other appropriate locations;
( b ) Use a portion of funds made available to the partner's program, to the extent consistent with the Federal law authorizing the partner's program and with Federal cost principles in 2 CFR parts 200 and 2900 (requiring, among other things, that costs are allowable, reasonable, necessary, and allocable), to: ( 1 ) Provide applicable career services; and
( 2 ) Work collaboratively with the State and Local WDBs to establish and maintain the one-stop delivery system. This includes jointly funding the one-stop infrastructure through partner contributions that are based upon: ( i ) A reasonable cost allocation methodology by which infrastructure costs are charged to each partner based on proportionate use and relative benefit received;
( ii ) Federal cost principles; and
( iii ) Any local administrative cost requirements in the Federal law authorizing the partner's program. (This is further described in § 678.700.)
( c ) Enter into an MOU with the Local WDB relating to the operation of the one-stop delivery system that meets the requirements of § 678.500(b);
( d ) Participate in the operation of the one-stop delivery system consistent with the terms of the MOU, requirements of authorizing laws, the Federal cost principles, and all other applicable legal requirements; and
( e ) Provide representation on the State and Local WDBs as required and participate in Board committees as needed.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

May-07

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Pumpin

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-May-07 4400 4 4 2,816 2,739 3 3 0 0 3 3 1,859 1,808 531 849 1,380 2-May-07 0000 0 0 2,816 2,739 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,859 1,808 872 560 1,432 3-May-07 0000 0 0 2,816 2,739 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,859 1,808 677 848 1,525 4-May-07 0000 0 0 2,816 2,739 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,859 1,808 676 846 1,522 5-May-07 0000 0 0 2,816 2,739 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,859 1,808 675 844 1,519 6-May-07 0000 0 0 2,816 2,739 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,859 1,808 673 855 1,528 7-May-07 4 2 12 0 16 2 2,832 2,741 3 1 8 0 11 1 1,869 1,809 679 693 1,372 8-May-07 0000 0 0 2,832 2,741 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,869 1,809 578 852 1,429 9-May-07 0000 0 0 2,832 2,741 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,869 1,809 652 853 1,504 

10-May-07 0031 3 1 2,835 2,742 0 0 2 1 2 1 1,871 1,810 532 853 1,385 

11-May-07 0000 0 0 2,835 2,742 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,871 1,810 538 849 1,387 

12-May-07 0000 0 0 2,835 2,742 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,871 1,810 530 849 1,379 

13-May-07 0000 0 0 2,835 2,742 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,871 1,810 786 850 1,637 

14-May-07 0200 0 2 2,835 2,744 0 1 0 0 0 1 1,871 1,811 661 844 1,505 

15-May-07 0141 4 2 2,839 2,746 0 1 3 1 3 1 1,874 1,812 521 853 1,374 

16-May-07 0000 0 0 2,839 2,746 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,874 1,812 302 852 1,154 

17-May-07 0000 0 0 2,839 2,746 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,874 1,812 275 855 1,130 

18-May-07 0000 0 0 2,839 2,746 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,874 1,812 317 852 1,169 

19-May-07 0000 0 0 2,839 2,746 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,874 1,812 273 855 1,127 20-May-07 0200 0 2 2,839 2,748 0 1 0 0 0 1 1,874 1,814 272 850 1,122 

21-May-07 0000 0 0 2,839 2,748 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,874 1,814 271 856 1,127 

22-May-07 0000 0 0 2,839 2,748 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,874 1,814 273 852 1,125 

23-May-07 0 0 2 13 2 13 2,841 2,761 0 0 1 9 1 9 1,875 1,822 798 848 1,646 

24-May-07 0000 0 0 2,841 2,761 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,875 1,822 359 849 1,208 25-May-07 0000 0 0 2,841 2,761 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,875 1,822 358 851 1,209 

26-May-07 0000 0 0 2,841 2,761 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,875 1,822 358 845 1,203 

27-May-07 0000 0 0 2,841 2,761 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,875 1,822 260 854 1,114 28-May-07 0000 0 0 2,841 2,761 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,875 1,822 321 853 1,173 

29-May-07 0000 0 0 2,841 2,761 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,875 1,822 315 853 1,167 

30-May-07 0100 0 1 2,841 2,762 0 1 0 0 0 1 1,875 1,823 315 854 1,169 

31-May-07 0 0 12 0 12 0 2,853 2,762 0 0 8 0 8 0 1,883 1,823 261 856 1,116 

Total 8 12 33 15 41 27 2,853 2,762 5 8 22 10 27 18 1,883 1,823 14,911 25,927 40,838 

Season Total 612 947 2,241 1,815

Banks Tracy Combined B
### §8151. Notification to Congress of IAEA Board approval of wide-area environmental sampling

#### (a) In general

Not later than 30 days after the date on which the Board of Governors of the IAEA approves wide-area environmental sampling for use as a safeguards verification tool, the President shall notify the appropriate congressional committees.

#### (b) Content

The notification under subsection (a) shall contain—

(1) a description of the specific methods and sampling techniques approved by the Board of Governors that are to be employed for purposes of wide-area sampling;

(2) a statement as to whether or not such sampling may be conducted in the United States under the Additional Protocol; and

(3) an assessment of the ability of the approved methods and sampling techniques to detect, identify, and determine the conduct, type, and nature of nuclear activities.

(Pub. L. 109–401, title II, §251, Dec. 18, 2006, 120 Stat. 2749.)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Militaryand security developments involving the Democratic People�s Republic of Korea:annual report to Congress**
 
2012 | 2013-2014 | 2015 | 2017
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.1/22:
Item Number:0306-A-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000949454
 
May 29, 2018
#### § 641.815 May the period of availability be extended?

SCSEP recipients may request in writing, and the Department may grant, an extension of the period during which SCSEP funds may be obligated or expended. SCSEP recipients requesting an extension must justify that an extension is necessary. (OAA § 517(b)). The Department will notify recipients in writing of the approval or disapproval of any such requests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 128.98

 129.45

 129.83

 129.65

 129.42

 129.46

 129.37

 129.27

 129.22

 129.31

 129.43

 129.57

 129.68

 129.78

 129.89

 130.00

 130.10

 130.19

 130.28

 130.31

 130.18

 130.08

 129.99

 129.84

 129.60

 129.34

 129.24

 129.31

 129.51

 129.61

 129.91

 483

 527

 563

 546

 524

 527

 519

 509

 505

 513

 525

 538

 549

 558

 569

 581

 591

 600

 610

 613

 599

 589

 580

 564

 541

 516

 507

 513

 532

 542

 571

STORAGE

+33

+44

+36

-17

-22

+3

-8

-10

-4

+8

+12

+13

+11

+9

+11

+12

+10

+9

+10

+3

-14

-10

-9

-16

-23

-25

-9

+6

+19

+10

+29

CHANGE

82

80

73

46

49

63

62

65

72

72

71

72

71

70

71

71

70

71

70

67

59

61

68

67

67

72

80

81

81

75

82

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

PUTAH

 40

 33

 30

 30

 34

 35

 41

 45

 49

 43

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 48

 50

 54

 60

 60

 53

 46

 45

 42

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .02

 .10

 .02

 .04

 .16

 .15

 .08

 .06

 .01

 .03

 .08

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .07

 .18

 .08

 .08

 .20

 .26

 .12

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .07

 .02

 .08

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JANUARY 2007 RUN DATE: 05/16/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +121 2,161 1,318 775 5 2.36 .08

ACRE-FEET +121 4,286 2,614 1,537 10

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,537

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,614

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .08

JULY 1, 2006 8.15

 450

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
#### Robert Mayer, as President of Local Union No. 2090 of United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, et al., Appellants, v. William L. Hutcheson, as General President of United Brotherhood of Carpenters *&*Joiners of America, et al., Defendants. Louis F. Semon et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present —- Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
February 2024

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. PUTAH 

SOUTH

PUTAH 

CREEK

C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

515

1 129.67 548 33 122 43 62 0 0.00 2.04

2 129.21 504 -44 78 69 31 0 0.00 0.02

3 128.97 482 -22 86 66 31 0 0.12 0.16

4 128.77 464 -18 1,595 23 1,581 0 0.00 3.11

5 129.34 516 52 536 41 469 0 0.00 1.26

6 129.71 552 36 223 65 140 0 0.08 0.04

7 130.02 583 31 112 65 31 0 0.07 0.00

8 130.06 587 4 90 60 28 0 0.02 0.17

9 129.90 570 -17 77 60 26 0 0.02 0.00

10 129.86 566 -4 80 56 26 0 0.08 0.00

11 129.94 574 8 85 55 26 0 0.10 0.00

12 129.91 571 -3 81 57 26 0 0.09 0.00

13 129.77 557 -14 79 60 26 0 0.04 0.00

14 129.69 550 -7 74 62 16 0 0.06 0.00

15 129.42 524 -26 79 65 27 0 0.04 0.14

16 129.29 511 -13 85 65 27 0 0.10 0.00

17 130.06 587 76 126 61 27 0 0.05 0.02

18 128.93 479 -108 191 52 193 0 0.00 0.91

19 129.95 576 97 274 53 172 0 0.01 0.84

20 129.76 556 -20 221 55 176 0 0.03 0.54

21 129.78 558 2 162 55 106 0 0.02 0.10

22 130.01 582 24 149 57 80 0 0.04 0.00

23 130.51 634 52 113 60 27 0 0.08 0.00

24 130.68 654 20 87 60 17 0 0.11 0.00

25 130.63 648 -6 86 62 27 0 0.11 0.00

26 130.40 623 -25 84 70 27 0 0.12 0.00

27 130.09 590 -33 115 66 66 0 0.14 0.00

28 129.70 551 -39 122 65 76 1 0.17 0.00

29 129.40 522 -29 149 64 100 0 0.14 0.00

TOTALS 7 5,361 1,692 3,667 1 1.84 9.35

ACRE-FEET 7 10,634 3,356 7,273 2

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Putah South Canal 3,356

Putah Creek 7,273

Total 10,630

Precipitation

This month = 9.35

October 01, 2023 To date = 19.64

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Solano Daily Operations

Run Date: 3/16/2024
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)



OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



In connection with the Annual Report of Amec
Foster Wheeler plc (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended 31 December 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Ian McHoul, Chief Financial Officer and interim CEO of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



1)  The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the
Company.



|Date: 23 March 2016 | /s/ IAN MCHOUL                         
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                    | Ian McHoul                             
|                    | Chief Financial Officer and interim CEO
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.156 Recruitment report. ( a ) *Requirements of a recruitment report.* The employer must prepare, sign, and date a written recruitment report. The recruitment report must be submitted on a date specified by the CO in the NOA set forth in § 655.143 and contain the following information: ( 1 ) Identify the name of each recruitment source and date(s) of advertisement;
( 2 ) State the name and contact information of each U.S. worker who applied or was referred to the job opportunity up to the date of the preparation of the recruitment report, and the disposition of each worker;
( 3 ) Confirm that former U.S. workers were contacted, with a description by what means they were contacted and the date(s) of such contact, or state there are no former U.S. workers to contact; and
( 4 ) If applicable, for each U.S. worker who applied for the position but was not hired, explain the lawful job-related reason(s) for not hiring the U.S. worker.
( b ) *Duty to update recruitment report.* The employer must continue to update the recruitment report until the end of the recruitment period, as set forth in § 655.135(d). The updated report must be made available in the event of a post-certification audit or upon request by the Department. The Department may share recruitment report information with any other Federal agency, as set forth in § 655.130(f).
1



### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA OP 24
- 0061

_________________ SOUTHWEST DISTRIBUTING CO., d/b/a SWD URETHANE,

Petitioner,
v. MONTANA NINETEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LINCOLN COUNTY, HON. MATTHEW J. CUFFE, Presiding Judge,

Respondent. O R D E R

_________________ Petitioner Southwest Distributing Co., d/b/a SWD Urethane (Southwest) seeks a writ of supervisory control over the Montana Nineteenth Judicial District Court in Cause No. DV
22
- 72 to reverse that court’s November 21, 2023 Opinion and Order Re: Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction that denied Southwest’s motion to dismiss. Southwest maintains the District Court erred in concluding it could exercise personal jurisdiction over Southwest pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 4(b)(1). At our invitation, North Idaho Insulation, LLC (NII), one of the defendants and third
-party plaintiffs in the case below, responded in opposition to Southwest’s petition. M. R. App. P. 14(7)(b) allows this Court to order more extensive briefing. Under M. R. App. P. 14(7) (a), the petitioner may not file a response brief except on order of this Court. In this case, the Court has determined that a reply brief is warranted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner Southwest Distributing Co. shall have to and including May 8 , 2024, to prepare, file, and serve a reply brief. The text of the reply brief shall not exceed 2,000 words
. The Clerk is directed to provide immediate notice of this Order to counsel for Petitioner, all counsel of record in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court Cause No. DV
-22
- 72 , and to the Honorable Matthew J. Cuffe , presiding District Judge. Electronically signed by: Laurie McKinnon Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 24 2024

04/24/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0061
### §8564. Report and imposition of sanctions with respect to foreign financial institutions conducting significant transactions with persons responsible for or complicit in abuses toward dissidents on behalf of the Government of Iran

#### (a) Report required

Not earlier than 30 days and not later than 60 days after the Secretary of State submits to the appropriate congressional committees a report required by section 8563(a) of this title, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that identifies any foreign financial institution that knowingly conducts a significant transaction with a foreign person identified in the report submitted under section 8563(a) of this title on or after the date on which the foreign person is identified in that report.

#### (b) Imposition of sanctions

The Secretary of the Treasury may prohibit the opening, or prohibit or impose strict conditions on the maintaining, in the United States of a correspondent account or a payable-through account by a foreign financial institution identified under subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 117–328, div. AA, title II, §205, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5535.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Masih Alinejad Harassment and Unlawful Targeting Act of 2022, also known as the Masih Alinejad HUNT Act of 2022, and not as part of the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability, and Divestment Act of 2010 which comprises this chapter.
§ 666.400 Under what circumstances are local areas eligible for State Incentive Grants? ( a ) States must use a portion of the funds reserved for Statewide workforce investment activities under WIA sections 128(a) and 133(a)(1) to provide Incentive Grants to local areas for regional cooperation among local boards (including local boards for a designated region, as described in WIA section 116(c)), for local coordination of activities carried out under this Act, and for exemplary performance on the local performance measures established under subpart C of this part.
( b ) The amount of funds used for Incentive Grants under paragraph (a) of this section and the criteria used for determining exemplary local performance levels to qualify for the incentive grants are determined by the Governor. (WIA sec. 134(a)(2)(B)(iii).)
§ 498.106 Determinations regarding the amount or scope of penalties and assessments. ( a ) In determining the amount or scope of any penalty and assessment, as applicable, in accordance with § 498.103(a) and (b) and 498.104, the Office of the Inspector General will take into account: ( 1 ) The nature of the statements, representations, or actions referred to in § 498.102(a) and (b) and the circumstances under which they occurred;
( 2 ) The degree of culpability of the person committing the offense;
( 3 ) The history of prior offenses of the person committing the offense;
( 4 ) The financial condition of the person committing the offense; and
( 5 ) Such other matters as justice may require.
( b ) In determining the amount of any penalty in accordance with § 498.103(c) and (d), the Office of the Inspector General will take into account— ( 1 ) The nature and objective of the advertisement, solicitation, or other communication, and the circumstances under which they were presented;
( 2 ) The frequency and scope of the violation, and whether a specific segment of the population was targeted;
( 3 ) The prior history of the individual, organization, or entity in their willingness or refusal to comply with informal requests to correct violations;
( 4 ) The history of prior offenses of the individual, organization, or entity in their misuse of program words, letters, symbols, and emblems;
( 5 ) The financial condition of the individual or entity; and
( 6 ) Such other matters as justice may require.
( c ) In cases brought under section 1140 of the Social Security Act, the use of a disclaimer of affiliation with the United States Government, the Social Security Administration or its programs will not be considered as a mitigating factor in determining the amount of a penalty in accordance with § 498.106.
[60 FR 58226, Nov. 27, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 18080, Apr. 24, 1996; 71 FR 28581, May 17, 2006]
EXHIBIT 32.2


                             CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.1350,
as  adopted), Steven Gidumal, Chief Financial Officer of Golden Gate Homes, Inc.
(the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that,  to  the  best  of  his  knowledge:

     1.  The  Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31,  2010,  to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Annual
Report")  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and

     2.  The  information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

      IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of April
14,  2011.

                    /s/  Steven  Gidumal
                    ---------------
                    Steven  Gidumal
     Chairman  of  the  Board  of  Directors
  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
               (Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 241

 231

 229

 233

 258

 276

 280

 244

 233

 221

 205

 206

 200

 188

 187

 192

 192

 182

 189

 192

 202

 204

 225

 198

 195

 185

 186

 187

 182

 181

 185

 174

 179

 175

 174

 175

 177

 181

 159

 159

 154

 149

 155

 150

 144

 144

 143

 137

 144

 147

 150

 153

 154

 154

 152

 148

 145

 149

 151

 151

 152

 154

 217

 209

 203

 205

 216

 223

 225

 205

 196

 189

 183

 185

 180

 171

 172

 173

 167

 164

 165

 170

 179

 184

 186

 179

 173

 167

 167

 169

 170

 170

 172

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 10, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Felipe CRUZ RANGEL; Esther Sanchez-Chavez, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-70775.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Dominic E. Capeci, Esq., Law Offices of Kaiser & Capeci, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jennifer A. Parker, Anthony W. Norwood, Esq., Jennifer Levings, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Felipe Cruz Rangel and his wife, Esther Sanchez-Chavez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *see Iturribarria v. INS,*321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the petitioners’ contention that the BIA should have exercised its sua sponte power to reopen their case. *See Ekimian v. INS,*303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir.2002).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion when it denied the petitioners’ motion to reopen as untimely where they filed the motion to reopen more than one year after the BIA’s final order of removal and did not show they were entitled to equitable tolling. *See Iturribarria,*321 F.3d at 897 (equitable tolling applies “when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception, fraud or error, as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence in discovering” the misconduct).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited *to or by the*courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.