alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 355.5 Review by the reviewing official. ( a ) If, based on the report of the investigating official under § 355.4(b), the reviewing official determines that there is adequate evidence to believe that a person is liable under § 355.3 of this part, the reviewing official shall transmit to the Attorney General a written notice of the reviewing official's intention to issue a complaint under § 355.7.
( b ) Such notice shall include— ( 1 ) A statement of the reviewing official's reasons for issuing a complaint;
( 2 ) A statement specifying the evidence that supports the allegations of liability;
( 3 ) A description of the claims or statements upon which the allegations of liability are based;
( 4 ) An estimate of the amount of money or the value of property, services, or other benefits requested or demanded in violation of § 355.3 this part;
( 5 ) A statement of any exculpatory or mitigating circumstances that may relate to the claims or statements known by the reviewing official or the investigating official; and
( 6 ) A statement that there is a reasonable prospect of collecting an appropriate amount of penalties and assessments. Such a statement may be based upon information then known or an absence of any information indicating that the person may be unable to pay such an amount.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 428.99

 427.52

 426.02

 424.29

 422.83

 421.36

 419.85

 418.40

 416.92

 415.42

 414.27

 412.84

 411.66

 410.28

 408.78

 407.59

 406.44

 404.95

 403.42

 401.86

 400.34

 398.58

 396.88

 395.15

 393.39

 391.94

 390.40

 389.19

 388.03

 387.19

 771,654

 758,215

 744,586

 728,961

 715,863

 702,764

 689,404

 676,665

 663,755

 650,765

 640,871

 628,648

 618,629

 606,987

 594,428

 584,534

 575,032

 562,808

 550,357

 537,770

 525,610

 511,661

 498,319

 484,878

 471,343

 460,300

 448,677

 439,622

 431,005

 424,805

STORAGE

-13,242

-13,439

-13,629

-15,625

-13,098

-13,099

-13,360

-12,739

-12,910

-12,990

-9,894

-12,223

-10,019

-11,642

-12,559

-9,894

-9,502

-12,224

-12,451

-12,587

-12,160

-13,949

-13,342

-13,441

-13,535

-11,043

-11,623

-9,055

-8,617

-6,200

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 6,777

 6,740

 6,672

 6,617

 6,562

 6,541

 6,520

 6,497

 6,452

 6,400

 6,377

 6,143

 4,744

 5,836

 6,272

 4,710

 4,685

 6,240

 6,220

 6,197

 6,180

 6,938

 6,832

 6,713

 6,793

 5,290

 5,845

 4,394

 4,124

 2,906

POWER

 243

 237

 245

 246

 258

 267

 275

 269

 252

 244

 248

 249

 271

 258

 253

 235

 227

 111

 188

 222

 235

 224

 191

 199

 206

 201

 262

 312

 321

 169

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+344

+202

+45

-1,015

+216

+205

+59

+343

+195

+95

+1,637

+229

-36

+224

+193

-43

+122

+189

+131

+73

+284

+130

+296

+136

+174

-77

+247

+140

+100

-50

OR

 178

 192

 176

 175

 145

 164

 165

 156

 169

 140

 108

 116

 181

 147

 162

 161

 160

 159

 141

 143

 141

 143

 164

 75

 74

 93

 109

 116

 129

 219

C.F.S.

 .60

 .65

 .60

 .60

 .50

 .57

 .58

 .55

 .60

 .50

 .39

 .42

 .66

 .54

 .60

 .60

 .60

 .60

 .54

 .55

 .55

 .56

 .65

 .30

 .30

 .38

 .45

 .48

 .54

 .92

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR August 29, 2013

DAILY OPERATIONS

JUNE 2013 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -360,091 0 179,217 7,118 0 +4,788 4,401 16.38 .00

ACRE-FEET -360,091 0 355,477 14,119 0 +9,497 8,729

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 355,477

PACHECO TUNNEL 14,119 TOTAL 369,596

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE = 6.11

 784,896

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
Leave No Trace Preservation through education: building awareness, appreciation, and most of all, respect for our public recreation places.

National Park Service Shenandoah National Park U.S. Department of the Interior

01/12

Park Emergency Number (800) 732-0911

Doyles

River Trail

Registration

Station

Loft Mountain

Wayside

Dundo Picnic

Grounds

Dundo Picnic

Grounds

Frazier Discovery Trail – 1.3-mile circuit from the trailhead. Moderate hike to beautiful 

views. Guidebook available at trailhead and wayside. Pets are not allowed on this trail.

Doyles River – 2.7 miles round trip to upper falls (28’); 3.2 to lower falls (63’). From 

parking area at mile 81.1, take blue-blazed Doyles River Trail. Moderately difficult.

Big Run Loop – 5.8-mile circuit from overlook along Big Run Loop Trail and 

Appalachian Trail; views and wildflowers. Moderate.

Browns Gap – 6.5-mile moderately difficult circuit. 3 waterfalls. From parking area cross 

Skyline Drive and take Browns Gap Fire Road. Go right on Doyles River Trail, connect 

with Jones Run, and turn right onto the Appalachian Trail to return. 

Jones Run Falls – 3.4 miles round trip. 42' falls. Moderate.

*

* Horses are only allowed on yellow-blazed fire roads and trails

Loft Mountain Area

Road and Trail Map

Park Information recording: (540) 999-3500 

www.nps.gov/shen

You’ll find these

trail markers at all 

trailheads and 

intersections. The 

metal bands are 

stamped with 

directional and 

mileage information.

You’ll find these

trail markers at all

trailheads and

intersections. The

metal bands are

stamped with

directional and 

mileage information.
### §§926 to 928. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 926, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §526, 60 Stat. 1010, related to benefits of Reserve officers.

Section 927, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §527, 60 Stat. 1010, related to reappointment or reassignment of Reserve officers.

Section 928, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §528, 60 Stat. 1010; Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §11, 74 Stat. 833, related to reinstatement of Reserve officers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22113]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9500]



[[Page 22113]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, Special Emphasis Panel, Research Infrastructure 
Program.
    Date: May 17, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Carla T. Walls, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Scientific Review, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6898, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f98e9895958a9ab994989095d7979091d79e968f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94e3f5f8f8e7f7d4f9f5fdf8bafafdfcbaf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 13, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9500 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAtomistic Simulations of Ti Additions to NiAlThe development of more efficient engines and power plants for future supersonic transports depends on the advancement of new high-temperature materials with temperature capabilities exceeding those of Ni-based superalloys. Having theoretical modelling techniques to aid in the design of these alloys would greatly facilitate this development. The present paper discusses a successful attempt to correlate theoretical predictions of alloy properties with experimental confirmation for ternary NiAl-Ti alloys. The B.F.S. (Bozzolo-Ferrante-Smith) method for alloys is used to predict the solubility limit and site preference energies for Ti additions of 1 to 25 at.% to NiAl. The results show the solubility limit to be around 5% Ti, above which the formation of Heusler precipitates is favored. These results were confirmed by transmission electron microscopy performed on a series of NiAl-Ti alloys.Document ID19980018499Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBozzolo, Guillermo*(Analex Corp. Brook Park, OH United States)*Noebe, Ronald D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Garg, Anita*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Ferrante, John*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Amador, Carlos*(Ciudad Univ. Mexico City,  Mexico)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Publication InformationPublication: Materials Research Society Symposium ProceedingsPublisher: Materials Research SocietyVolume: 460Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-97-207384NAS 1.15:207384Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980018499.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       16
§ 682.200 What are required statewide employment and training activities? Required statewide employment and training activities are: ( a ) Required rapid response activities, as described in § 682.310;
( b ) Disseminating by various means, as provided by WIOA sec. 134(a)(2)(B): ( 1 ) The State list of eligible training providers (including those providing non-traditional training services), for adults and dislocated workers and eligible training providers of registered apprenticeship programs;
( 2 ) Information identifying eligible providers of on-the-job training (OJT), customized training, incumbent worker training (see § 680.790 of this chapter), internships, paid or unpaid work experience opportunities (see § 680.180 of this chapter) and transitional jobs (see § 680.190 of this chapter);
( 3 ) Information on effective outreach and partnerships with business;
( 4 ) Information on effective service delivery strategies and promising practices to serve workers and job seekers;
( 5 ) Performance information and information on the cost of attendance, including tuition and fees, consistent with the requirements of §§ 680.490 and 680.530 of this chapter;
( 6 ) A list of eligible providers of youth activities as described in WIOA sec. 123; and
( 7 ) Information of physical and programmatic accessibility for individuals with disabilities;
( c ) States must assure that the information listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (7) of this section is widely available;
( d ) Conducting evaluations under WIOA sec. 116(e), consistent with the requirements found under § 682.220;
( e ) Providing technical assistance to State entities and agencies, local areas, and one-stop partners in carrying out activities described in the State Plan, including coordination and alignment of data systems used to carry out the requirements of this Act;
( f ) Assisting local areas, one-stop operators, one-stop partners, and eligible providers, including development of staff, including staff training to provide opportunities for individuals with barriers to employment to enter in-demand industry sectors or occupations and nontraditional occupations, and the development of exemplary program activities;
( g ) Assisting local areas for carrying out the regional planning and service delivery efforts required under WIOA sec. 106(c);
( h ) Assisting local areas by providing information on and support for the effective development, convening, and implementation of industry and sector partnerships;
( i ) Providing technical assistance to local areas that fail to meet the adjusted levels of performance agreed to under § 677.210 of this chapter;
( j ) Carrying out monitoring and oversight of activities for services to youth, adults, and dislocated workers under WIOA title I, and which may include a review comparing the services provided to male and female youth;
( k ) Providing additional assistance to local areas that have a high concentration of eligible youth; and
( l ) Operating a fiscal and management accountability information system, based on guidelines established by the Secretary.
§ 702.806 What weekly maximum rates apply to compensation for permanent total disability? ( a ) The maximum rate in effect on the date that the employee became totally and permanently disabled applies to all compensation payable for permanent total disability during that fiscal year.
( b ) For all periods the employee is permanently and totally disabled in subsequent fiscal years, the weekly compensation payable is subject to each subsequent year's maximum rate.
( c ) If a claimant is receiving compensation for permanent total disability at the maximum rate for the current fiscal year, but the next fiscal year's maximum rate will be higher than the claimant's calculated compensation rate, the claimant's compensation for the next fiscal year will increase by the amount of the 10(f) adjustment, subject to the maximum rate for the next fiscal year.
( d ) Examples: ( 1 ) Employee *A* suffers a covered workplace injury on April 1, 2000, and is permanently and totally disabled from that date forward. *A's* compensation for the period from April 1, 2000, until September 30, 2000, is subject to the FY 2000 maximum rate. Beginning October 1, 2000, *A's* compensation for FY 2001 is subject to the FY 2001 maximum rate, compensation for FY 2002 is subject to the FY 2002 maximum rate, *etc.*
( 2 ) Employee *B* suffers a covered workplace injury on April 1, 2000, is temporarily totally disabled from that day through June 3, 2002, and is thereafter permanently totally disabled. *B's* compensation for the period from April 1, 2000, through June 3, 2002, is subject to the FY 2000 maximum rate (*see* § 702.805(a)). *B's* compensation for the period from June 4, 2002, through September 30, 2002, is subject to the FY 2002 maximum rate. Beginning October 1, 2002, *B's* compensation for FY 2003 is subject to the FY 2003 maximum rate, compensation for FY 2004 is subject to the FY 2004 maximum rate, *etc.*
( 3 ) Employee *C* suffers a covered workplace injury in FY 2009 and is permanently totally disabled from that day forward. He was earning $1,950.00 a week when he was injured, making his calculated compensation rate $1,300.00 ($1,950.00 × 2 ÷ 3). His calculated compensation rate exceeds the maximum rate from FY 2009-2012; thus, his compensation is limited to each year's maximum rate. In FY 2013, *C's* calculated compensation rate of $1,300.00 is, for the first time, less than the FY 2013 maximum rate of $1,325.18. Applying the FY 2013 2.31% section 10(f) adjustment to *C's* FY 2012 compensation rate of $1,295.20 results in a compensation rate of $1,325.00 ($1,295.20 × .0231 = $29.92, rounded to the nearest cent; $1,295.20 + $29.92 = $1,325.12, rounded to the nearest dollar). This amount falls just below the FY 2013 maximum rate of $1,325.18. Thus, *C's* benefit rate for FY 2013 is $1,325.00, and is not limited by the maximum rate.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Eight Hours for Women Employed in District of Columbia

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Labor, 1883-1947					 and 	Sixty-Third Congress, 1913-1915. 						*Eight Hours for Women Employed in District of Columbia : Hearings Before the Committee on Labor of the House of Representatives, on the Bill H.R. 27281, January 30 and February 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12, 1913*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										January 30 and February 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12, 1913,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/291,			accessed on September 23, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       15
### §44. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–189, div. A, title III, §347(1), Nov. 29, 1989, 103 Stat. 1422

Section, R.S. §4818; Sept. 24, 1980, Pub. L. 96–357, §7(a), 94 Stat. 1183, related to funds for support of the Soldiers' and Airmen's Home. See section 2772 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: August 20, 2014

TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Region 7, EPA

SUBJECT: July 30, 2014, Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A conference call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on July 30, 2014

to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The majority of the 

discussion centered on how goals were established for the states in Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, 

Missouri, and Nebraska. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on 

June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

EPA Region 7:

Mark A. Smith

Ward Burns

Toni Gargas

Amy Bhesania

Kansas Department of Health and 

Environment

Rick Brunetti

Melissa Weide

Miles Stotts

Lynn Deahl

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

Mark Leath