alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 20, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60568

Summary Calendar

 

ELISA SARA MENDES,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A79 478 339

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lisa Sara Mendes, a native and citizen of Angola, has

petitioned for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s

(“IJ”) decision denying her applications for asylum and

withholding of removal and for relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). In rejecting Mendes’ applications, the IJ

found that Mendes lacked credibility. 

Generally, we review the decision of the BIA and will

consider the underlying decision of the IJ only if it influenced
No. 04-60568

-2-

the BIA’s determination. Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 302 (5th

Cir. 1997). When, as in this case, the BIA adopts the IJ’s

decision without a written opinion, we review the IJ’s decision. 

Id. 

The IJ articulated cogent reasons, supported by substantial

evidence in the record, for rejecting Mendes’ testimony as

incredible. See Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 79 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Absent credible testimony by Mendes, substantial evidence

supports the IJ’s determination that Mendes failed to establish

that she was eligible for asylum and withholding of removal. See

id. Because Mendes makes only a conclusory statement that she is

entitled to relief under the CAT, she has shown no error in the

IJ’s denial of relief under the CAT. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293

F.3d 899, 907 (5th Cir. 2002).

Accordingly, her petition for review is DENIED.
§ 901.34 Conferences. ( a ) *In general.* The Executive Director may confer with an enrolled actuary concerning allegations of his/her misconduct whether or not a proceeding for suspension or termination has been initiated against him/her. If the conference results in agreement as to certain facts or other matters in connection with such a proceeding, such agreement may be entered in the record at the request of the actuary or the Executive Director.
( b ) *Voluntary suspension or termination of enrollment.* An enrolled actuary, in order to avoid the initiation or conclusion of a suspension or termination proceeding, may offer his/her consent to suspension or termination of enrollment or may offer his/her resignation. The Executive Director may accept the offered resignation or may suspend or terminate enrollment in accordance with the consent offered.
### §9005. Admissibility of documents

With respect to any application to the United States Central Authority, or any petition to a court under section 9003 of this title, which seeks relief under the Convention, or any other documents or information included with such application or petition or provided after such submission which relates to the application or petition, as the case may be, no authentication of such application, petition, document, or information shall be required in order for the application, petition, document, or information to be admissible in court.

(Pub. L. 100–300, §6, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 11605 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications.                    

*Date:*                         May 16, 2012.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maja Maric, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, DHHS/NIH/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3266, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2634,                         *maja.maric@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: April 19, 2012.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2012-10089 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
L. Preston Bryant, Jr. 

Secretary of Natural Resources 

COMMONWEALTH a/VIRGINIA 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 

TDD (804) 698-4021 

www.deq.virginia.gov 

Ms. Judith M. Katz, Director 

Air Protection Division (3APOO) 

MAR 0 6 '::[YJ9 I t . .. , , 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

David K. Paylor 

Director 

(804) 698-4000 

1-800-592-5482 

Reference: SIP Revision for 

MeadWestvaco Packaging 

Resource Group 

Dear Ms. Katz: 

Pursuant to the requirements of § 110 of the Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting 

approval of a revision to the Commonwealth of Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

approved on February 23,2009 under the authority of § 10.1-1185 ofthe Code of Virginia and 

submitted in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, 

Adoption, and Submittal ofImplementation Plans). The plan revision is effective upon the date 

of this letter. 

The revision consists of the control of visibility-impairing emissions from MeadWestvaco 

Packaging Resource Group located in Alleghany County, Virginia through the application of 

Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART). 

Enclosed are the following: 

1. SIP Revision, including the following: 

A. Federally enforceable state operating permit. 

B. Statement of basis, including federal land manager comment. 
2. Public participation certification. 

3. Summary of testimony and responses thereto. 

If you have any questions or need additional information, please let us know. 

DKP\kgs 

TEMPLATES\SOURCE-SPECIFIC\PLNOO 

SRCESPEC\MEADWESTVACO\MW-SIP.DOC 

Enclosures
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports dated August 10, 1999, included in and incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1999, into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-56929, 33-99210, and 333-3262) and
Form S-8 (Nos. 33-88714 and 333-24263).



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
September 28, 1999
Order entered July 12 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01137
- CR
NICHOLAS RYAN NADEAU , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 296th J udicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296
- 83228
- 2018

O RDER
We REINST ATE this appeal.
On June 30 , 2021 , we abated this appeal and ordered the trial court to appoint new counsel. On July 1, 2021, a supplemental clerk ’ s record w a s filed

cont aining the a ppoint ment of Maria Tu.
We DIRECT the Clerk to list M aria Tu as counsel in the above appeal. All
f u ture notices shall be sent to M s. Tu at the address o n file with the Court.On the Court ’ s own motion, we ORDER appellant ’ s brief du e by Septe mber

10 , 2021.
W e DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable John
Roach , Jr. , Presidi ng Judge, 296 th Judicial Dis trict Court ; to M aria Tu ; to the
Collin County District Attorney ; and to Nicholas Ryan Nadeau , TDCJ #0 2283434 , Co l e Unit , 3801 Silo Road , Bonham, TX 75418

. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Table of Contents

Exhibit13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-Fof StealthGas Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) for thefiscal year ending December  31,  2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), the undersigned officer of theCompany hereby certifies to the undersigned’s knowledge,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C.  Section  1350), that:

|  |          |                                                                                                                     |
|--|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 1.  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|  |          |                                                                                                                                                    |
|--|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | 2.  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

Dated: April 19, 2006

|                                         |  |  |
|-----------------------------------------|--|--|
| /s/ Andrew J.Simmons                    |
| Andrew J. SimmonsChief FinancialOfficer |
|                                         |

----
§ 683.830 When will the Administrative Law Judge issue a decision? ( a ) The ALJ should render a written decision not later than 90 days after the closing of the record.
( b ) The decision of the ALJ constitutes final agency action unless, within 20 days of the decision, a party dissatisfied with the ALJ's decision has filed a petition for review with the Administrative Review Board (ARB) (established under Secretary's Order No. 01-2020), specifically identifying the procedure, fact, law, or policy to which exception is taken, in accordance with 29 CFR part 26. Any exception not specifically raised in the petition is deemed to have been waived. A copy of the petition for review also must be sent to the opposing party and if an applicant or recipient, to the Grant Officer and the Grant Officer's Counsel at the time of filing. Unless the ARB, within 30 days of the filing of the petition for review, notifies the parties that the case has been accepted for review, the decision of the ALJ constitutes final agency action. In any case accepted by the ARB, a decision must be issued by the ARB within 180 days of acceptance. If a decision is not so issued, the decision of the ALJ constitutes final agency action.
[81 FR 56410, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 13030, Mar. 6, 2020; 85 FR 30616, May 20, 2020; 86 FR 1779, Jan. 11, 2021]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 25 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk July 25 , 2018

153696(54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 153696

v COA: 325449

` Gratiot CC: 14

- 007061

- FH

DAVID ALLEN SNYDER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the time

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted

for filing if submitted on or before September 25, 2018

.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony
Vuolo, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WebMD Health Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. [Intentionally omitted]*

4. [Intentionally omitted]*

5. [Intentionally omitted]*

Date: April 30, 2012



/s/ Anthony VuoloAnthony VuoloInterim Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)






|* | Paragraphs 3 through 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by WebMD Health Corp. on February 29, 2012.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  November
      10, 2008
              
              /s/ Ann F.
      Massey
              Name: 
      Ann F. Massey
              Title:   
      Chief Financial Officer
[Letterhead of KPMG LLP]                Exhibit 99.2b


                         Independent Accountants' Report


The Boards of Directors
Countrywide Financial Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management Assertion, that Countrywide Financial Corporation and subsidiaries,
including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"),
and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL,
(collectively, the "Company") complied with the minimum servicing standards set
forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards specified above and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Countrywide Financial Corporation
and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Countrywide Home
Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing, L.P., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL, complied with the aforementioned minimum
servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.

                               /s/ KPMG LLP


March 3, 2006



                                [Letterhead of Countrywide Home Loans]


                                Management Assertion


March 3, 2006


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, Countrywide Financial
Corporation and subsidiaries, including its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. ("CHL"), and Countrywide Home Loans Servicing,
L.P., a wholly-owned subsidiary of CHL, (collectively, the "Company") have
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set
forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period, the Company
had in effect a mortgage bankers' (fidelity) bond in the amount of $200
million and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $100 million
and $130 million for the period January 1, 2005 to August 1, 2005 and for the
period from August 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005, respectively.



/s/ Steve Bailey
---------------------------
Senior Managing Director and
Chief Executive Officer, Loan Administration


/s/ Kevin Meyers
---------------------------
Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer,
Loan Administration
### §137. Repealed. July 3, 1930, ch. 863, §7, 46 Stat. 1018

Section, R.S. §4835, related to application of Articles of War to inmates of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Redpoint Bio Corporation (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Scott Horvitz, Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



Dated: May 12, 2011

/s/ SCOTT HORVITZ Scott Horvitz Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


*A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redpoint Bio Corporation and will be retained by Redpoint Bio
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---



QuickLinks
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe 'CommTech' Methodology: A Demand-Driven Approach to Efficient, Productive and Measurable Technology TransferMarket research sources were used to initially gather primary technological problems and needs data from non-aerospace companies in targeted industry sectors. The company-supplied information served as input data to activate or start-up an internal, phased match-making process. This process was based on technical-level relationship exploration followed by business-level agreement negotiations, and culminated with project management and execution. Space Act Agreements represented near-term outputs. Company product or process commercialization derived from Lewis support and measurable economic effects represented far-term outputs.Document ID19980234241Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHorsham, Gray A. P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1998Subject CategoryUrban Technology And TransportationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:208496NASA/TM-1998-208496E-11291Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 251-30-07Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980234241.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 99.3 - Annual Statement of Compliance for the year
	       ended December 31, 2005


	OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER
         RE: ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Irwin Union Bank and
Trust Company as Servicer ("Servicer") pursuant to the Servicing Agreement
dated as of May 1, 2005, by and among Irwin Union Bank and Trust
Company as Servicer, Irwin Whole Loan Home Equity Trust 2005-B as Issuer,
and U.S. Bank National Association as Indenture Trustee (as such agreement
may be amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the
"Servicing Agreement"), does hereby certify as follows:

A.    	Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective
	meanings set forth in the Servicing Agreement. References
	herein to certain Sections and Subsections are references to the
	respective Sections and Subsections of the Servicing Agreement.

B.	This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to Section 3.10 of the
	Servicing Agreement.

C.	The Servicer is the Servicer under the Servicing Agreement.

D.	The undersigned is a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

E.	A review of the activities of the Servicer during the 2005 fiscal
	year and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has
	been made under my supervision.

F.	To the best of my knowledge, based on the above-mentioned review,
	the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
	Servicing Agreement and any applicable Supplements throughout
	the 2005 fiscal year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Servicer has caused this Certificate to be
executed and delivered on its behalf by its duly authorized officer on
this 7th day of March 2006.

				IRWIN UNION BANK AND TRUST COMPANY



Attest: /s/ Suzanne Mercier		    By: /s/ Jocelyn Martin-Leano
	Suzanne Mercier			Jocelyn Martin-Leano
	Assistant Secretary -		Senior Vice President -
	Home Equity Lending		Home Equity Lending