alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4452 

To designate the area between the intersections of International Drive Northwest and Van Ness Street Northwest and International Drive Northwest 

and International Place Northwest in Washington, District of Columbia, 

as ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2016 

Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the area between the intersections of International Drive Northwest and Van Ness Street Northwest and International Drive Northwest and International Place Northwest in Washington, District of Columbia, as ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LIU XIAOBO PLAZA. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION OF PLAZA.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The area between the inter6 sections of International Drive Northwest and Van 

7 Ness Street Northwest and International Drive 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4452 IH

1 Northwest and International Place Northwest in 

2 Washington, District of Columbia, shall be known 

3 and designated as ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’. 

4 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

5 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

6 the area referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 

7 deemed to be a reference to Liu Xiaobo Plaza. 

8 (b) DESIGNATION OF ADDRESS.— 

9 (1) DESIGNATION.—The address of 3505 Inter10 national Place Northwest, Washington, District of 

11 Columbia, shall be redesignated as 1 Liu Xiaobo 

12 Plaza. 

13 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

14 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

15 the United States to the address referred to in para16 graph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 1 Liu 

17 Xiaobo Plaza. 

18 (c) SIGNS.—The Administrator of General Services 

19 shall construct street signs that shall— 

20 (1) contain the phrase ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’; 

21 (2) be similar in design to the signs used by 

22 Washington, District of Columbia, to designate the 

23 location of Metro stations; and 

24 (3) be placed on— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4452 IH

1 (A) the parcel of Federal property that is 

2 closest to 1 Liu Xiaobo Plaza (as redesignated 

3 by subsection (b)); and 

4 (B) the street corners of International 

5 Drive Northwest and Van Ness Street North6 west and International Drive Northwest and 

7 International Place Northwest, Washington, 

8 District of Columbia. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 686.320 What if a current center operator is deemed to be an operator of a high-performing center? ( a ) If an offeror meets the requirements as an operator of a high-performing center as applied to a particular Job Corps center, that operator will be allowed to compete in any competitive selection process carried out for an award to operate that center.
( b ) An offeror is considered to be an operator of a high-performing center if the Job Corps center operated by the offeror: ( 1 ) Is ranked among the top 20 percent of Job Corps centers for the most recent preceding program year according to the rankings calculated under § 686.1060; and
( 2 ) Meets the expected levels of performance established under § 686.1050 with respect to each of the primary indicators of performance for Job Corps centers: ( i ) For the period of the most recent preceding 3 program years for which information is available at the time the determination is made, achieved an average of 100 percent, or higher, of the expected level of performance for the indicator; and
( ii ) For the most recent preceding program year for which information is available at the time the determination is made, achieved 100 percent, or higher, of the expected level of performance established for the indicator.
( c ) If any of the program years described in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section precedes the implementation of the establishment of the expected levels of performance under § 686.1050 and the application of the primary indicators of performance for Job Corps centers identified in § 686.1010, an entity is considered an operator of a high-performing center during that period if the Job Corps center operated by the entity: ( 1 ) Meets the requirements of paragraph (b)(2) of this section with respect to such preceding program years using the performance of the Job Corps center regarding the national goals or targets established by the Office of the Job Corps under the previous performance accountability system for— ( i ) The 6-month follow-up placement rate of graduates in employment, the military, education, or training;
( ii ) The 12-month follow-up placement rate of graduates in employment, the military, education, or training;
( iii ) The 6-month follow-up average weekly earnings of graduates;
( iv ) The rate of attainment of secondary school diplomas or their recognized equivalent;
( v ) The rate of attainment of completion certificates for career technical training;
( vi ) Average literacy gains; and
( vii ) Average numeracy gains; or
( 2 ) Is ranked among the top five percent of Job Corps centers for the most recent preceding program year according to the rankings calculated under § 686.1060.
### §5502. Coordinator for Counterterrorism

The Coordinator for Counterterrorism shall be responsible for the coordination of international aviation security for the Department of State.

(Pub. L. 101–604, title II, §202, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3082.)
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-19-00222-CV 

SANJAY JOSHI, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

SOUTHLAKE AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Tarrant County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2016-006369-1, Honorable Don Pierson, Presiding 

 

June 21, 2019 

 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ. 

Appellant, Sanjay Joshi, appeals from a take-nothing judgment against both 

appellant and appellee, Southlake Automotive, LLC. Appellee has filed a cross-appeal. 

The judgment was originally appealed to the Second Court of Appeals. By letter of May 

21, 2019, the Second Court of Appeals advised the parties of its intent to refer the matter 

to mediation and directed the parties to select a mediator. On June 4, 2019, the parties 

notified the Second Court of Appeals that they had agreed upon a mediator. The appeal 
2

was subsequently transferred to this Court by order of the Texas Supreme Court. TEX.

GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013).

Accordingly, to expedite the possible disposition of this appeal and in the interest 

of conservation of judicial resources, we abate the appeal and suspend all appellate 

deadlines. This cause will be removed from our active docket and treated as a closed 

case until August 20, 2019, or until further order of this Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 43.6. 

The parties are directed to advise this Court of the status of the mediation by August 20, 

2019. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam
Table of Contents

EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS*

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, each of the undersignedofficers of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. (the‘‘Company’’) hereby certifies, to suchofficer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the period ended December  31,  2005 (the‘‘Report’’) fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934  and the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/    Terry R. McCormack         TerryR. McCormackChief Executive OfficerApril 13,  2006

/s/    Thomas H. Madden         ThomasH. MaddenChief Financial OfficerApril 13,  2006

*The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed as part ofthe Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

----
§ 681.520 What are leadership development opportunities? Leadership development opportunities are opportunities that encourage responsibility, confidence, employability, self-determination, and other positive social behaviors such as: ( a ) Exposure to postsecondary educational possibilities;
( b ) Community and service learning projects;
( c ) Peer-centered activities, including peer mentoring and tutoring;
( d ) Organizational and team work training, including team leadership training;
( e ) Training in decision-making, including determining priorities and problem solving;
( f ) Citizenship training, including life skills training such as parenting and work behavior training;
( g ) Civic engagement activities which promote the quality of life in a community; and
( h ) Other leadership activities that place youth in a leadership role such as serving on youth leadership committees, such as a Standing Youth Committee.
**Exhibit 24.5**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

As a director of NewPage HoldingCorporation, a Delaware corporation, and of NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the ***“Company”***), I hereby constitute and appoint Douglas K. Cooper, David J. Prystash, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each ofthem, with full power to act without the others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (***“Form 10-K”***), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all otherdocuments in connection with the Form 10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be donein and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or causeto be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 10th day ofFebruary, 2010.
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Gaurav Singh                                         Gaurav Singh,Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)July 7, 2010 |   |   |   |

----
### §3949. Limited appointments

(a) A limited appointment in the Service, including an appointment of an individual who is an employee of an agency, may not exceed 5 years in duration and, except as provided in subsections (b) and (c), may not be extended or renewed. A limited appointment in the Service which is limited by its terms to a period of one year or less is a temporary appointment.

(b) A limited appointment may be extended for continued service—

(1) as a consular agent;

(2) in accordance with section 3951(a) of this title;

(3) as a career candidate, if—

(A) continued service is determined appropriate to remedy a matter that would be cognizable as a grievance under subchapter XI; or

(B) the individual is serving in the uniformed services (as defined in section 4303 of title 38) and the limited appointment expires in the course of such service;

(4) as a career employee in another Federal personnel system serving in a Foreign Service position on detail from another agency;

(5) as a foreign national employee;

(6) in exceptional circumstances if the Secretary determines the needs of the Service require the extension of—

(A) a limited noncareer appointment for a period not to exceed 1 year; or

(B) a limited appointment of a career candidate for the minimum time needed to resolve a grievance, claim, investigation, or complaint not otherwise provided for in this section.

(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) noncareer employees who have served for 5 consecutive years under a limited appointment under this section may be reappointed to a subsequent noncareer limited appointment if there is at least a 1-year break in service before such new appointment.

(2) The Secretary may waive the 1-year break requirement under paragraph (1) in cases of special need.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §309, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2086; Pub. L. 100–204, title I, §176, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1361; Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §180(a)(1), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 415; Pub. L. 103–415, §1(hh), Oct. 25, 1994, 108 Stat. 4303; Pub. L. 114–323, title IV, §409, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1930.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 114–323, §409(1), substituted "subsections (b) and (c)" for "subsection (b)".

Subsec. (b)(3). Pub. L. 114–323, §409(2)(A), substituted "if—" for "if", inserted subpar. (A) designation before "continued service" and "or" after semicolon at end, and added subpar. (B).

Subsec. (b)(6). Pub. L. 114–323, §409(2)(B)–(D), added par. (6).

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–323, §409(3), added subsec. (c).

1994—Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 103–236, as amended by Pub. L. 103–415, added par. (5).

1987—Pub. L. 100–204 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), substituted "subsection (b)" for "section 3951(a) of this title", and added subsec. (b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          15,974
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         860,886
<DEPRECIATION>                                  90,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 900,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,000
<BONDS>                                        350,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     480,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   900,156
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,392
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,513
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.21


</TABLE>
No. 11,687.

#### Estate of Durant. Wilson *v.*Warner, Administrator.

Decided January 23, 1928.

Rehearing denied February 14, 1928.

On claim against the estate of a deceased person. Claim disallowed.

*Affirmed.*

1. *Witnesses*— Competency—Administrators. On trial of a claim against the estate of a deceased person, objection to the offer of claimant “to identify his book account which w© expect to offer in evidence, ’ ’ as incompetent, properly sustained under C. L. § 6556.

2. *Statutes*— Witnesses—Construction. C. L. § 6557, does not constitute an amendment of, nor exception to, C. L. § 6556, concerning witnesses.

*Error to the District Court of the City and County of*Denver, *Hon. J. C.*Starkweather, *Judge.*

Mr. Perry Behymer, Mr. Riley R. Cloud, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Golding Fairfield, for defendant in error.

*281
      *En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Burke

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, filed a claim against the estate of Durant. It was disallowed by the county court and on appeal a like judgment was entered by the district court. To review that judgment plaintiff sues out this writ.

Plaintiff’s counsel offered him as a witness “to identify his book account which we expect to offer in evidence.” This was objected to as incompetent and the objection was sustained. Error assigned on this ruling presents the only question here requiring consideration.

Assuming, but not deciding, that the offer was sufficient, the ruling was correct. “No party to any civil action, * * * shall be allowed to testify therein, of his own motion, or in his own behalf, * * * when any adverse party sues or defends as the * * * administrator * * * of any deceased person, * * * ” § 6556, C. L. 1921.

Plaintiff claims the right to introduce the evidence in question' under the following section: “When in any civil action, suit or proceeding, the claim or defense is founded on a book account, any party or interested person, * * * may testify to his or their account book and the items therein contained; that the same is a book of original entries, and that the entries therein were made by himself or his employe, and are true and just, * * * and were made * * * in the usual course of trade, * * * and thereupon the said account book and entries shall be admitted as prima facie evidence in the case upon the matters as shown by said account book. ’ ’ § 6557, C. L. 1921.

Plaintiff says the last section amends the first and constitutes an exception to it. With this we cannot agreé. These sections (so far as the language here in question is concerned) were first adopted in 1870 and are a part of *282the same act. L. 1870, p. 62. Neither amends the other. The first is section 2 of that act and the last is section 3. Following said provisions of section 2 are five of the seven exceptions which now form a part of said section 6556, each set out in a distinct paragraph. Had it been the intention of the legislature to make book accounts also an exception it would have included them among the others. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
§ 702.242 Information necessary for a complete settlement application. ( a ) The settlement application shall be a self-sufficient document which can be evaluated without further reference to the administrative file. The application shall be in the form of a stipulation signed by all parties and shall contain a brief summary of the facts of the case to include: a description of the incident, a description of the nature of the injury to include the degree of impairment and/or disability, a description of the medical care rendered to date of settlement, and a summary of compensation paid and the compensation rate or, where benefits have not been paid, the claimant's average weekly wage.
( b ) The settlement application shall contain the following: ( 1 ) A full description of the terms of the settlement which clearly indicates, where appropriate, the amounts to be paid for compensation, medical benefits, survivor benefits and representative's fees which shall be itemized as required by § 702.132.
( 2 ) The reason for the settlement, and the issues which are in dispute, if any.
( 3 ) The claimant's date of birth and, in death claims, the names and birth dates of all dependents.
( 4 ) Information on whether or not the claimant is working or is capable of working. This should include, but not be limited to, a description of the claimant's educational background and work history, as well as other factors which could impact, either favorably or unfavorably, on future employability.
( 5 ) A current medical report which fully describes any injury related impairment as well as any unrelated conditions. This report shall indicate whether maximum medical improvement has been reached and whether further disability or medical treatment is anticipated. If the claimant has already reached maximum medical improvement, a medical report prepared at the time the employee's condition stabilized will satisfy the requirement for a current medical report. A medical report need not be submitted with agreements to settle survivor benefits unless the circumstances warrant it.
( 6 ) A statement explaining how the settlement amount is considered adequate.
( 7 ) If the settlement application covers medical benefits an itemization of the amount paid for medical expenses by year for the three years prior to the date of the application. An estimate of the claimant's need for future medical treatment as well as an estimate of the cost of such medical treatment shall also be submitted which indicates the inflation factor and/or the discount rate used, if any. The adjudicator may waive these requirements for good cause.
( 8 ) Information on any collateral source available for the payment of medical expenses.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0160) [50 FR 399, Jan. 3, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 4284, Feb. 3, 1986]