alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 129.57

 129.41

 129.36

 129.61

 129.90

 130.22

 130.48

 130.55

 130.58

 130.56

 130.54

 130.51

 130.43

 129.87

 129.67

 129.54

 129.50

 129.56

 129.69

 129.62

 130.03

 129.95

 129.92

 129.93

 129.99

 130.09

 130.53

 130.47

 538

 523

 518

 542

 570

 603

 631

 639

 642

 640

 637

 634

 626

 567

 548

 535

 531

 537

 550

 543

 584

 576

 572

 573

 580

 590

 636

 630

STORAGE

-23

-15

-5

+24

+28

+33

+28

+8

+3

-2

-3

-3

-8

-59

-19

-13

-4

+6

+13

-7

+41

-8

-4

+1

+7

+10

+46

-6

CHANGE

64

68

73

84

85

83

75

65

62

56

54

54

66

46

66

71

79

75

68

57

75

77

77

73

75

76

73

75

INFLOW

 19

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

PUTAH

 57

 60

 60

 56

 55

 50

 45

 45

 43

 40

 40

 40

 54

 60

 60

 62

 65

 56

 45

 45

 38

 65

 63

 56

 55

 55

 34

 61

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

C.F.S.

 .04

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .18

 .15

 .07

 .09

 .07

 .01

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .02

 .06

 .06

 .07

 .09

 .09

 .12

 .13

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .41

 .03

 .15

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2002 RUN DATE: 03/13/2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +69 1,952 1,465 451 3 2.02 1.23

ACRE-FEET +69 3,872 2,906 895 6

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 895

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,906

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.23

JULY 1, 2001 20.98

 561

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
First Department,

May, 1914.

#### The American Protective Tariff League, Appellant, *v.*Ohio C. Barber, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, made at Special Term and entered in the ¡New York county clerk’s office on the 23d day of March, 1914, directing the plaintiff to serve a reply to the first defense and the third partial defense in amended answer.

Per Curiam:

The order should be modified by inserting a provision that the service of the reply shall not affect the date of issue or the posi*874tion of the cause on the calendar, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order modified as directed in opinion, and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent. Order to be settled on notice.
*

The Honorable R. Leon Jordan, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District

of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 06a0353n.06

Filed: May 17, 2006

No. 04-5604

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MELINDA MORRIS, A.K.A. MELINDA

MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Before: SILER and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; JORDAN, District Judge.*

ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Melinda Morris appeals her sentence for conspiracy to

manufacture and distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The government

concedes that Morris is entitled to resentencing under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005),

because the district court treated the Sentencing Guidelines range as mandatory rather than advisory.

Accordingly, we vacate her sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with Booker. 

Morris’s additional argument—that the two-level enhancement to her sentence pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) was clearly erroneous because the presence of a firearm was not proven by
No. 04-5604

United States v. Morris

- 2 -

a preponderance of the evidence—is without merit. Based upon the Presentence Investigation

Report (PSR), the district court found that Morris had admitted to possessing a firearm on May 21,

2001, when she pleaded guilty to the state-law offense of trafficking in a controlled substance “while

being in possession of a .38-caliber handgun.” Morris argues that the possession of a firearm was

not an element of her state conviction, but she provides no evidence to refute the findings of the PSR

and district court. A defendant cannot show that a PSR is inaccurate simply by denying its truth,

but must show “some evidence beyond a bare denial that calls the reliability or correctness of the

alleged facts into question.” United States v. Lang, 333 F.3d 678, 681-82 (6th Cir. 2003).
### §317. Appropriation for highway purposes of lands or interests in lands owned by the United States

(a) If the Secretary determines that any part of the lands or interests in lands owned by the United States is reasonably necessary for the right-of-way of any highway, or as a source of materials for the construction or maintenance of any such highway adjacent to such lands or interests in lands, the Secretary shall file with the Secretary of the Department supervising the administration of such lands or interests in lands a map showing the portion of such lands or interests in lands which it is desired to appropriate.

(b) If within a period of four months after such filing, the Secretary of such Department shall not have certified to the Secretary that the proposed appropriation of such land or material is contrary to the public interest or inconsistent with the purposes for which such land or materials have been reserved, or shall have agreed to the appropriation and transfer under conditions which he deems necessary for the adequate protection and utilization of the reserve, then such land and materials may be appropriated and transferred to the State transportation department, or its nominee, for such purposes and subject to the conditions so specified.

(c) If at any time the need for any such lands or materials for such purposes shall no longer exist, notice of the fact shall be given by the State transportation department to the Secretary and such lands or materials shall immediately revert to the control of the Secretary of the Department from which they had been appropriated.

(d) The provisions of this section shall apply only to projects constructed on a Federal-aid highway or under the provisions of chapter 2 of this title.

(Pub. L. 85–767, Aug. 27, 1958, 72 Stat. 916; Pub. L. 105–178, title I, §1212(a)(2)(A)(i), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 193; Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, §1104(c)(6), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 427.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2012—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–141 substituted "highway" for "system".

1998—Subsecs. (b), (c). Pub. L. 105–178 substituted "State transportation department" for "State highway department".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2012 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 112–141 effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

January 2012

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily To

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CF

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 3,737 1,9

2-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 4,082 1,9

3-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 4,082 1,9

4-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 4000 0 0 0 0 3 4,082 1,9

5-Jan-12 0400 0 4 0 8030 0 0 3 0 5 4,081 1,9

6-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,082 1,9

7-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,080 1,9

8-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,331 1,9

9-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,331 1,9

10-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,331 1,9

11-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,331 1,9

12-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,080 1,9

13-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,082 1,9

14-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,437 1,9

15-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,433 1,9

16-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,707 1,9

17-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,550 1,9

18-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,562 1,9

19-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,866 1,9

20-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,053 1,9

21-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,191 1,9

22-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 4,921 2,4

23-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,287 2,7

24-Jan-12 0000 0 0 0 8000 0 0 0 0 5 3,716 2,7

25-Jan-12 0040 4 0 4 8003 0 3 0 3 5 3,707 3,0

26-Jan-12 0020 2 0 6 8001 0 1 0 4 5 2,605 3,1

27-Jan-12 4040 8 0 14 8 3 0 3 0 5 0 9 5 2,572 3,1

28-Jan-12 0000 0 0 14 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 3,331 3,1

29-Jan-12 0060 6 0 20 8 0 0 4 0 4 0 13 5 3,331 3,1

30-Jan-12 0000 0 0 20 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 5 3,331 3,1

31-Jan-12 0021 2 1 22 9 0 0 1 1 1 1 15 6 2,506 3,1

Total 4 4 18 1 22 5 22 9 3 3 12 1 15 3 15 6 114,820 70,6

Banks Tracy
Order entered January 30, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00571-CR

WINDELL STOKES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-50472-422-F

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s January 28, 2019 third motion for extension of time to file 

its brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the State’s brief filed on or before February 27, 

2019. The State is cautioned that this case may be set for submission at any time.

We DIRECT the Clerk to set this case at issue.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934




For the month of  November 2003

Commission File Number 333-7182-01


                                   CEZ, a. s.
      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)
                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic

      ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                    Form 20-F  X              Form 40-F
                              ---                       ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____ Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T
Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                      Yes                        No  X
                          ---                       ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________
<PAGE>
The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s. in Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:




                         Confirmation of interest in SE

In accordance with the requirements set forth in the advertisement for a
potential entry into the privatization process for Slovenske elektrarne, a.s.
[Slovak Power Company], CEZ, a.s., delivered to the Prague office of
PricewaterhouseCoopers Ltd a letter with an expression of interest containing
the required information regarding CEZ.
<PAGE>

                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                           CEZ, a. s.
                                                     ------------------------
                                                          (Registrant)
Date:  November 10, 2003

                                                  By: /s/ Libuse Latalova
                                                     ------------------------
                                                         Libuse Latalova
                                                  Head of Finance Administration
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
June 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET SAN LUIS RELEASE - C.F.S. GAIN(+) OR EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY

ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING 

C.F.S

POWER PACHECO

TUNNEL

SPILL LOSS(-) C.F.S. C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

2,018,313

1 542.41 2,020,343 2,030 1,730 0 0 0 -706 185 0.45 0.00

2 542.59 2,022,628 2,285 1,646 707 0 0 213 103 0.25 0.00

3 542.55 2,022,120 -508 1,640 1,749 0 0 -147 197 0.48 0.00

4 542.71 2,024,152 2,032 1,720 0 0 0 -695 210 0.51 0.00

5 542.89 2,026,438 2,286 1,146 0 0 0 6 284 0.69 0.00

6 542.77 2,024,914 -1,524 0 883 0 0 115 127 0.31 0.01

7 542.60 2,022,755 -2,159 0 1,060 0 0 -28 123 0.30 0.00

8 542.52 2,021,739 -1,016 717 1,060 0 0 -169 140 0.34 0.00

9 542.69 2,023,898 2,159 1,864 707 0 0 -68 185 0.45 0.00

10 542.90 2,026,565 2,667 2,428 707 0 0 -376 177 0.43 0.00

11 542.88 2,026,311 -254 1,219 707 90 0 -549 123 0.30 0.00

12 542.74 2,024,533 -1,778 0 618 143 0 -135 185 0.45 0.00

13 542.59 2,022,628 -1,905 0 618 179 0 -163 185 0.45 0.00

14 542.53 2,021,866 -762 0 618 181 0 415 173 0.42 0.00

15 542.38 2,019,963 -1,903 573 1,229 178 0 -125 180 0.44 0.00

16 542.24 2,018,186 -1,777 573 1,228 172 0 -70 185 0.45 0.00

17 542.40 2,020,216 2,030 1,867 610 158 0 -76 185 0.45 0.00

18 542.50 2,021,486 1,270 1,509 530 136 0 -202 230 0.56 0.00

19 542.64 2,023,263 1,777 2,293 1,045 152 0 -200 247 0.60 0.00

20 542.06 2,015,903 -7,360 0 3,482 155 0 -74 185 0.45 0.00

21 542.11 2,016,537 634 1,586 883 152 0 -231 230 0.56 0.00

22 542.09 2,016,284 -253 1,147 883 153 0 -238 185 0.45 0.00

23 542.04 2,015,650 -634 0 0 181 0 -138 107 0.26 0.00

24 542.15 2,017,045 1,395 2,140 883 186 0 -368 115 0.28 0.00

25 542.33 2,019,328 2,283 2,422 883 178 0 -210 238 0.58 0.00

26 542.45 2,020,851 1,523 2,280 1,055 184 0 -272 189 0.46 0.00

27 541.46 2,008,300 -12,551 0 6,186 191 0 49 184 0.45 0.00

28 540.20 1,992,365 -15,935 0 8,091 191 0 248 184 0.45 0.00

29 538.81 1,974,838 -17,527 0 8,920 196 0 280 184 0.45 0.00

30 537.73 1,961,256 -13,582 0 6,894 114 0 161 183 0.45 0.00

TOTALS -57,057 30,500 52,236 3,270 0 -3,753 5,408 13.17 0.01

ACRE-FEET -57,057 60,499 103,612 6,489 0 -7,455 10,727

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 103,612 Spill 0

Pacheco Tunnel 6,489

Total 110,101

Precipitation

This month = 0.01

October 01, 2022 To date = 17.08

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/30/2024
#### § 663.585 May individuals choose training providers located outside of the local area?

Yes, individuals may choose any of the eligible providers and programs on the State list. A State may also establish a reciprocal agreement with another State(s) to permit providers of eligible training programs in each State to accept individual training accounts provided by the other State. (WIA secs. 122(e)(4) and (e)(5).)
#### § 725.451 Request for hearing.

After the completion of proceedings before the district director, or as is otherwise indicated in this part, any party may in writing request a hearing on any contested issue of fact or law (see § 725.419). A district director may on his or her own initiative refer a case for hearing. If a hearing is requested, or if a district director determines that a hearing is necessary to the resolution of any issue, the claim shall be referred to the Chief Administrative Law Judge for a hearing under § 725.421.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of BEFUT International Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mei Yu, as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Mei YuMei YuChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)










This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4325 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4325

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2016

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 
                          and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Small Business Act to modify the anticipated value of 
  certain contracts reserved exclusively for small business concerns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Unifying Small Business Terminology 
Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE ANTICIPATED VALUE OF CERTAIN CONTRACTS 
              RESERVED EXCLUSIVELY FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS.

    (a) In General.--Section 15(j)(1) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) is amended by striking ``greater than $2,500 but not 
greater than $100,000'' and inserting ``greater than the micro-purchase 
threshold defined in section 1902(a) of title 41, United States Code, 
but not greater than the simplified acquisition threshold''.
    (b) Technical Amendment.--Section 3(m) of the Small Business Act 
(15 U.S.C. 632(m)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(m) Simplified Acquisition Threshold.--In this Act, the term 
`simplified acquisition threshold' has the meaning given such term in 
section 134 of title 41, United States Code.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25488]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10331]



[[Page 25488]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Ancillary Studies to 
major ongoing Clinical Research to advance areas of scientific 
interest in NIDDK.
    Date: May 22, 2012.
    Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6706 Democracy Blvd. 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Najma Begum, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 749, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8894, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9efcfbf9ebf3f0def0f7fafaf5b0f0f7f6b0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bddfd8dac8d0d3fdd3d4d9d9d693d3d4d593dad2cb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 24, 2012.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-10331 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>