alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
· . .,__: 

SERVED: August 13, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

BRAD GOODSPEED 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0549 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER ENTERING DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST RESPONDENT 

The Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter "FAA") filed a Complaint dated 

August 21, 2014. Brad Goodspeed (hereinafter "Respondent") filed a Request for 

Hearing on August 15,2014. 

We issued a Procedural Order on September 8, 2014. 

Complainant filed a Motion for Decision on October 17, 2014. 

Respondent has failed to file any pleadings subsequent to the filing ofthe Request 

for Hearing. Respondent has failed to fully answer the Complaint and has failed to 

respond to our Procedural Order, or Complainant's Motion. Under Rule 13.209(t), a 

failure to file an answer to a Complaint without good cause is deemed an admission of 

the truth of each allegation contained in the Complaint. 

WHEREFORE, the FAA's Motion for Decision having been read and considered, 

it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Request for Hearing be and is hereby DISMISSED _with 

prejudice; 

2. Respondent be and is hereby DEEMED to have admitted to all of the 

allegations in the FAA's Complaint; 

3. The FAA's Motion for Decision be and is hereby GRANTED; and 
4. Judgment be and is hereby ENTERED as civil penalty in the amount of 

$8,800 against Respondent as requested in the FAA's Complaint. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment-- Service List 

2 
SERVICE UST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Heating Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

Brad M. Goodspeed, Re.spondent 

2810 West Washington Avenue 

Yakima, W A 98903-1100 

Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Lavv Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S.E. (E 11-31 0) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0549 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W 1000, Washington. 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.99

 130.81

 130.90

 130.88

 130.90

 130.96

 130.86

 130.84

 130.97

 130.87

 130.82

 130.75

 130.90

 130.95

 130.89

 130.91

 130.81

 130.68

 130.78

 131.00

 130.98

 130.79

 130.70

 130.82

 130.89

 130.92

 130.89

 130.61

 130.70

 130.71

 130.69

 689

 668

 678

 676

 678

 685

 674

 671

 686

 675

 669

 662

 678

 684

 677

 679

 668

 654

 665

 690

 688

 666

 656

 669

 677

 680

 677

 645

 656

 657

 655

STORAGE

+22

-21

+10

-2

+2

+7

-11

-3

+15

-11

-6

-7

+16

+6

-7

+2

-11

-14

+11

+25

-2

-22

-10

+13

+8

+3

-3

-32

+11

+1

-2

CHANGE

547

560

616

638

645

549

492

445

494

516

542

564

510

447

432

472

487

496

501

435

418

409

426

434

439

453

456

445

434

450

459

INFLOW

 36

 35

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

PUTAH

 498

 535

 575

 603

 608

 510

 463

 412

 451

 487

 510

 532

 467

 409

 401

 436

 457

 468

 460

 387

 384

 385

 396

 392

 400

 416

 423

 426

 393

 414

 425

PUTAH

 2

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .49

 .41

 .43

 .44

 .43

 .35

 .28

 .25

 .36

 .40

 .38

 .50

 .37

 .41

 .35

 .37

 .52

 .30

 .37

 .28

 .26

 .29

 .26

 .30

 .36

 .32

 .37

 .37

 .35

 .42

 .43

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

AUGUST 2021 RUN DATE: 09/07/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -12 15,211 14,123 1,057 37 11.42 .00

ACRE-FEET -12 30,171 28,013 2,097 73

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,097

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 28,013

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2021 .00

 667

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 8.13
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 836.80

 836.78

 836.68

 836.66

 836.62

 836.64

 836.67

 836.73

 836.77

 836.77

 836.74

 836.74

 837.22

 837.86

 838.53

 839.02

 839.45

 839.88

 840.26

 840.62

 840.54

 840.45

 840.40

 840.32

 840.23

 840.12

 840.04

 839.97

 839.77

 839.61

 839.47

 45.09

 45.07

 44.95

 44.92

 44.87

 44.90

 44.94

 45.01

 45.06

 45.06

 45.02

 45.02

 45.61

 46.40

 47.23

 47.85

 48.40

 48.94

 49.43

 49.89

 49.79

 49.67

 49.61

 49.51

 49.39

 49.25

 49.15

 49.06

 48.80

 48.60

 48.42

STORAGE

+0.04

-0.03

-0.12

-0.02

-0.05

+0.02

+0.04

+0.07

+0.05

+0.00

-0.04

+0.00

+0.59

+0.79

+0.84

+0.61

+0.55

+0.55

+0.49

+0.46

-0.10

-0.12

-0.06

-0.10

-0.12

-0.14

-0.10

-0.09

-0.25

-0.20

-0.18

CHANGE

362

329

282

332

318

355

362

380

367

342

325

344

430

458

457

346

311

311

283

270

208

205

206

193

189

171

191

199

117

140

153

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 320

 321

 110

 34

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 235

 235

 212

 219

 219

 218

 218

 218

 218

 217

 217

OUTLET

 3

 2

 3

 4

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 3

 3

 4

 6

 5

 6

 5

 6

 7

 6

 5

 8

 6

 6

 8

 4

 5

 6

 7

 6

 6

C.F.S.

 .07

 .05

 .07

 .10

 .07

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .09

 .11

 .14

 .12

 .16

 .13

 .14

 .17

 .15

 .12

 .20

 .15

 .15

 .19

 .10

 .13

 .15

 .17

 .16

 .14

INCHES

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MARCH 2007 RUN DATE: 05/07/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +3.38 8,936 6,471 620 147 3.68 .11

ACRE-FEET +3,380 17,725 12,835 1,230 292

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,230

OUTLET

TOTAL

 12,835

 14,065

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .11

JULY 1, 2006 9.29

 45.06

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### § 226.50 General.

There is a monthly ceiling on total family benefits which limits the amount of certain portions of the employee and spouse annuity. This railroad retirement family maximum amount varies according to the employee's earnings in the ten-year period that ends with the year in which his or her annuity begins. If the employee and spouse annuity amounts described in § 226.52 of this part are higher than the maximum from § 226.51 of this part, first the spouse tier II, then the supplemental annuity and, finally, the employee tier II are reduced until the total annuity amount is equal to the maximum or until the spouse tier II and the employee supplemental annuity and tier II have been reduced to zero, whichever comes first. The reduction for the railroad retirement family maximum is first computed from the date the employee's annuity begins. It is recomputed if the employee's tier II rate is reduced for entitlement to a vested dual benefit. It is also recomputed if a workers' compensation or other disability benefit begins or ends, or the employee's tier I benefit or supplemental annuity begins after the beginning date of the regular employee annuity. Finally, it is recomputed if a spouse who was entitled to an annuity divorces the employee or the spouse annuity entitlement ends.
EXHIBIT 23-2

[MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. LETTERHEAD]

August 11, 1999

MCN Energy Group Inc.







| |     |                                                                 
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| | Re: | MCN Energy Group Inc. 
	 1999 Second Quarter Report on Form 10-Q

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd. consents to the use of its
name and the information contained in its report dated
January 4, 1999, regarding MCN Energy Group Inc.s oil
and gas reserve information as of December 31, 1998 in its
1999 Second Quarter Report on Form 10-Q.

In addition, Miller and Lents, Ltd. consents to the incorporation
 by reference of said material in Registration Statement
Nos. 333-02105 and 333-02107 on Form S-8, 333-47137,
333-47139, and 333-45281 on Form S-3, and Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement
No. 33-21930-99 on Form S-8 of MCN Energy Group Inc.

Miller and Lents, Ltd. has no interest in MCN Energy Group Inc.
or any affiliated companies or subsidiaries and is not to receive
 such interest as payment for such reports and has no director,
officer, or employee otherwise connected with MCN Energy Group
Inc. We are not employed by MCN Energy Group Inc. on a contingent
 basis.



| |                       
| | ----------------------
| | Yours very truly,     
|
| | MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.



| |    |                                                  
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------
| | By | JAMES C. PEARSON 
	 James C. Pearson 
	 President
§ 618.884 Special rule with respect to military service. ( a ) *In general.* Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, a State may waive any requirement of this part that the States determines is necessary to ensure that an AAW who is a member of a reserve component of the Armed Forces and serves a period of duty described in paragraph (b) of this section is eligible to receive a trade readjustment allowance, training, and other benefits under this part in the same manner and to the same extent as if the worker had not served the period of duty.
( b ) *Period of duty described.* An AAW serves a period of duty described in paragraph (a) of this section if, before completing training under section 236 of the Act, the worker: ( 1 ) Serves on active duty for a period of more than 30 days under a call or order to active duty of more than 30 days; or
( 2 ) In the case of a member of the Army National Guard of the United States or Air National Guard of the United States, performs full-time National Guard duty under 32 U.S.C. 502(f) for 30 consecutive days or more when authorized by the President or the Secretary of Defense for the purpose of responding to a national emergency declared by the President and supported by Federal funds.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS**I, Elissa J. Lindsoe, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Identix Incorporated (the“registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: December 6, 2005 By: /s/ Elissa J. Lindsoe       Elissa J. Lindsoe
# Concentrations
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 714.31

 708.51

 707.06

 707.94

 708.52

 708.99

 709.38

 709.73

 710.04

 710.31

 710.57

 710.80

 711.02

 711.22

 711.41

 711.60

 707.27

 707.74

 707.25

 707.61

 707.90

 707.36

 707.11

 707.46

 707.09

 707.42

 707.04

 707.35

 707.62

 707.02

 707.34

 993

 819

 779

 803

 820

 833

 844

 853

 862

 870

 878

 885

 892

 898

 903

 909

 785

 798

 784

 794

 802

 787

 780

 790

 780

 789

 778

 787

 794

 778

 787

STORAGE

-81

-174

-40

+24

+17

+13

+11

+9

+9

+8

+8

+7

+7

+6

+5

+6

-124

+13

-14

+10

+8

-15

-7

+10

-10

+9

-11

+9

+7

-16

+9

CHANGE

-8

-33

-9

13

10

8

7

6

6

5

5

5

5

4

4

4

-32

8

-2

6

5

-5

-1

6

-1

6

-3

6

5

-3

6

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 33

 55

 11

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 31

 1

 5

 1

 1

 3

 3

 1

 4

 1

 3

 1

 1

 5

 1

 1015

 1030

 1010

 1010

TIME

 .15

 .16

 .17

 .23

COPPER

 .49

 .52

 .55

 .65

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 26, 2007

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -287 33 0 174

ACRE-FEET -287 65 0 345

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 345

 345

 1,074

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .002

 .002

 .002

 .002

Table 7
§ 671.120 Who is eligible to apply for national emergency grants? ( a ) *For projects within a State.* A State, a Local Board or another entity determined to be appropriate by the Governor of the State in which the project is located may apply for a national emergency grant. Also, Indian tribes, tribal organizations, Alaska Native entities, Indian-controlled organizations serving Indians, or Native Hawaiian organizations which are recipients of funds under section 166 of the Act (Indian and Native American Programs) may apply for a national emergency grant.
( b ) *For inter-State projects.* Consortia of States and/or Local Boards may apply. Other private entities which can demonstrate, in the application for assistance, that they possess unique capabilities to effectively respond to the circumstances of the major economic dislocation(s) covered in the application may apply.
( c ) *Other entities.* The Secretary may consider applications from other entities, to ensure that appropriate assistance is provided in response to major economic dislocations.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       15
§ 683.275 What wage and labor standards apply to participants in activities under title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act? ( a ) Individuals in on-the-job training or individuals employed in activities under title I of WIOA must be compensated at the same rates, including periodic increases, as trainees or employees who are similarly situated in similar occupations by the same employer and who have similar training, experience, and skills. Such rates must be in accordance with applicable law, but may not be less than the higher of the rate specified in sec. 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) or the applicable State or local minimum wage law.
( b ) The reference in paragraph (a) of this section to sec. 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) is not applicable for individuals in territorial jurisdictions in which sec. 6(a)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 206(a)(1)) does not apply.
( c ) Individuals in on-the-job training or individuals employed in programs and activities under title I of WIOA must be provided benefits and working conditions at the same level and to the same extent as other trainees or employees working a similar length of time and doing the same type of work.
( d ) Allowances, earnings, and payments to individuals participating in programs under title I of WIOA are not considered as income for purposes of determining eligibility for and the amount of income transfer and in-kind aid furnished under any Federal or Federally-assisted program based on need, other than as provided under the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 301 *et seq.*).
Order entered January 28, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01008-CV

IN RE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 468th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 468-54807-2011

ORDER

Before Justices Pedersen, III, Carlyle, and Garcia

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus, and DENY the motion for temporary stay as moot.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III

JUSTICE
Abatement Order filed January 20, 2015 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00944-CR

____________

JORGE ALBERT PAVON-MALDONADO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 258th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 21793

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant challenges the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress. 

Although appellant requested findings of fact and conclusions of law, none have 

been filed. When the losing party on a motion to suppress requests findings of fact 

and conclusions of law, the trial court is required to make them. State v. Cullen,

195 S.W.3d 696, 698–99 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). 
Accordingly, the trial court is directed to reduce to writing its findings of 

fact and conclusions of law on the denial of appellant’s motion to suppress and 

have a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of 

this Court within thirty days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this Court. The Court will 

also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan.
### SUBCHAPTER V—ORGANIZATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

This subchapter was in the original title VI of Pub. L. 94–437. Titles IV and V of Pub. L. 94–437 are classified to subchapters III–A and IV of this chapter, respectively.
#### § 703.301 Employers who may be authorized as self-insurers.

The regulations in this subpart set forth procedures for authorizing employers to self-insure the payment of compensation under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act, or its extensions. The Office may authorize any employer to self-insure who, pursuant to the regulations in this part, furnishes to the Office satisfactory proof of its ability to pay compensation directly, and who agrees to immediately cancel any existing insurance policy covering its Longshore obligations (except for excess or catastrophic workers' compensation insurance, *see* §§ 703.302(a)(6), 703.304(a)(6)) when OWCP approves the employer's application to be self-insured. The regulations require self-insurers to deposit security in the form of an indemnity bond, letters of credit or negotiable securities (at the option of the employer) of a kind and in an amount determined by the Office, and prescribe the conditions under which such deposits shall be made. The term “self-insurer” as used in these regulations means any employer securing the payment of compensation under the LHWCA or its extensions in accordance with the provisions of 33 U.S.C. 932(a)(2) and these regulations.
§ 672.320 What timeframes must be devoted to education and workforce investment or other activities? YouthBuild grantees must structure programs so that participants in the program are offered: ( a ) Eligible education activities, as specified in § 672.310(a), during at least 50 percent of the time during which they participate in the program; and
( b ) Eligible workforce investment activities, as specified in § 672.310(b), during at least 40 percent of the time during which they participate in the program. Grantees must provide the eligible workforce investment activities described in § 672.310(b)(1) as part of their program of eligible workforce investment activities.
( c ) The remaining 10 percent of the time of participation can be used for the activities described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and/or for leadership development and community service activities.