alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## NUMBER 13

- 2 0

- 00 176

- C V

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

EX PARTE A.G.

On appeal from the 107 th District Court

of Cameron C ounty, Texas.



## CONCURR ING MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides

, Hinojosa , and Silva

C oncurring Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Although I agree with the majority’s disposition of this appeal and their decision not

to address A.G.’s second issue

, I write separately to stress that an i n mate’s constitutional

right to access the courts cannot be abridged merely because of his status as an inmate.

In re Z.L.T. , 124 S.W.3d 163, 1 65 (Tex. 2003) (citing Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517,

523 (1984) ). A n inmate does not have an absolute right to appear in person in every court

proceeding because the inmate ’ s right to access the courts must be weighed against

penological interests

. Id. (cit ations omitted) . But where an inmate requests to appear by2

an effective alternative means, such as by tel ephone, those penolog ical interest s are no

longer imp licated. In re A.W. , 302 S.W.3d 925, 930 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2010, no pet.)

.

Courts should strive to ensure that all parties can exercise this fundamental right up to its

constitutional limit

.

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Delivered and filed on the

24th day of June , 202 1

.
EXHIBIT 32

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

      In connection with the quarterly report of NVCN Corporation. ("Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to his knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 17, 2008                 By: /s/ Gary Borglund
                                          -----------------
                                      Gary Borglund, Principal Executive Officer
                                      and Principal Financial Officer

                                       17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 129.63

 131.22

 129.46

 130.06

 130.15

 130.05

 129.84

 129.65

 129.55

 129.56

 129.51

 129.50

 129.50

 129.47

 129.33

 129.92

 130.64

 130.20

 129.96

 130.32

 130.59

 130.34

 129.85

 129.89

 130.28

 130.07

 129.97

 129.88

 130.15

 544

 716

 527

 587

 596

 586

 564

 546

 536

 537

 532

 531

 531

 528

 515

 572

 649

 601

 577

 614

 643

 616

 565

 569

 610

 588

 578

 568

 596

STORAGE

-72

+172

-189

+60

+9

-10

-22

-18

-10

+1

-5

-1

+0

-3

-13

+57

+77

-48

-24

+37

+29

-27

-51

+4

+41

-22

-10

-10

+28

CHANGE

123

183

220

115

86

79

73

76

83

86

82

80

80

79

78

118

134

71

87

115

106

76

64

66

101

79

85

85

103

INFLOW

 117

 25

 272

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

PUTAH

 42

 71

 43

 60

 55

 59

 59

 60

 63

 60

 60

 56

 55

 55

 59

 64

 70

 70

 74

 71

 66

 65

 65

 39

 55

 65

 65

 65

 64

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .11

 .18

 .10

 .00

 .05

 .08

 .10

 .03

 .09

 .06

 .29

 .19

 .09

 .08

 .05

 .09

 .02

 .05

 .01

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .09

 .07

 .07

 .11

INCHES

 .59

 .00

 .94

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .45

 .15

 1.10

 .60

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

FEBRUARY 2008 RUN DATE: 05/08/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -20 2,813 1,755 1,064 3 2.12 3.85

ACRE-FEET -20 5,580 3,481 2,110 6

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,110

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,481

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.85

JULY 1, 2007 25.32

 616

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 714.02

 714.19

 714.36

 714.53

 714.67

 714.83

 714.97

 715.12

 715.33

 715.43

 715.52

 715.58

 715.78

 715.87

 716.00

 716.08

 716.30

 716.36

 716.39

 716.45

 716.50

 716.54

 716.65

 716.70

 716.82

 716.85

 716.90

 716.94

 716.98

 717.01

 717.04

 984

 989

 995

 1,000

 1,004

 1,010

 1,014

 1,019

 1,026

 1,029

 1,032

 1,034

 1,041

 1,044

 1,048

 1,051

 1,058

 1,060

 1,061

 1,063

 1,065

 1,066

 1,069

 1,071

 1,075

 1,076

 1,078

 1,079

 1,080

 1,081

 1,082

STORAGE

+5

+5

+6

+5

+4

+6

+4

+5

+7

+3

+3

+2

+7

+3

+4

+3

+7

+2

+1

+2

+2

+1

+3

+2

+4

+1

+2

+1

+1

+1

+1

CHANGE

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

3

5

2

3

1

4

2

2

2

4

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1120

 1015

 0900

 0855

 0957

TIME

 .28

 .27

 .28

 .27

 .26

COPPER

 .87

 .83

 .76

 .75

 .78

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2004 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 30, 2004

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +103 65 0 4

ACRE-FEET +103 129 0 8

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 8

 8

 979

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .002

 .001

Table 7
### SUBCHAPTER IV—MONITORING, EVALUATION, AND REPORTING
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-458-CR

SAMUEL LLOYD UNDERWOOD A/K/A 	APPELLANT

SAMUEL LLOYD UNDERWOOD, III	

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	------------

	FROM THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Samuel Lloyd Underwood, a/k/a Samuel Lloyd Underwood, III is attempting to appeal his conviction and sentence for possession of a controlled substance.  We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

	Appellant’s sentence was imposed on August 10, 2006, and no motion for new trial was filed.  Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due September 11, 2006;2 however, the notice of appeal was not filed until December 14, 2006.  On January 3, 2007, we notified appellant by letter of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.  Although appellant filed a response, it does not state grounds for continuing the appeal.3  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  February 8, 2007
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20317 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. WILLIAM GLENN CHUNN Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-153-1 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent William Glenn Chunn has moved for leave towithdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chunn has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
### **CHAPTER 6—GOVERNMENT OF INDIAN COUNTRY AND RESERVATIONS**

#### SUBCHAPTER I—GENERALLY

Sec.
211.
Creation of Indian reservations.
212 to 228. Repealed.
229.
Injuries to property by Indians.
230.
Depositions by agents touching depredations.
231.
Enforcement of State laws affecting health and education; entry of State employees on Indian lands.
232.
Jurisdiction of New York State over offenses committed on reservations within State.
233.
Jurisdiction of New York State courts in civil actions.

#### SUBCHAPTER II—TRAFFIC IN INTOXICATING LIQUORS

241 to 252. Repealed.
253.
Wines for sacramental purposes.
254.
Repealed.

#### SUBCHAPTER III—TRADERS WITH INDIANS

261.
Power to appoint traders with Indians.
262.
Persons permitted to trade with Indians.
263.
Prohibition of trade by President.
264.
Trading without license; white persons as clerks.
265, 266.
Repealed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 701.86

 701.88

 701.89

 701.92

 701.91

 701.93

 700.37

 700.39

 700.42

 700.45

 700.46

 699.68

 699.14

 698.62

 698.24

 698.95

 699.37

 699.68

 701.23

 703.16

 704.84

 706.38

 709.17

 719.94

 721.42

 722.21

 722.84

 720.01

 721.03

 721.58

 722.31

 646

 646

 646

 647

 647

 647

 611

 611

 612

 612

 613

 595

 582

 571

 562

 578

 588

 595

 631

 677

 720

 760

 838

 1,184

 1,238

 1,267

 1,290

 1,186

 1,223

 1,243

 1,270

STORAGE

+1

+0

+0

+1

+0

+0

-36

+0

+1

+0

+1

-18

-13

-11

-9

+16

+10

+7

+36

+46

+43

+40

+78

+346

+54

+29

+23

-104

+37

+20

+27

CHANGE

44

43

43

44

83

151

131

149

150

149

150

139

139

140

141

154

152

152

104

24

23

21

39

174

27

15

12

8

19

10

15

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 43

 43

 43

 43

 83

 151

 149

 149

 149

 149

 149

 148

 146

 146

 146

 146

 147

 148

 86

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 60

 0

 0

 1

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2010

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +625 2,645 0 2,328

ACRE-FEET +625 5,246 0 4,618

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 4,618

 4,618

 645

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
H. R. 4618 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 121 

Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, as the ‘‘Sidney Oslin Smith, Jr. Federal 

Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SIDNEY OSLIN SMITH, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED 

STATES COURTHOUSE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building and United States 

courthouse located at 121 Spring Street SE in Gainesville, Georgia, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sidney Oslin Smith, Jr. 

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal 

building and United States courthouse referred to in subsection 

(a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sidney Oslin Smith, 

Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, et al., Petitioners v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent El Paso Natural Gas Company, et al., Intervenors.

No. 04-1123.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Oct. 20, 2005.

Janice M. Alward, Timothy James Sabo, Arizona Corporation Commission, Phoenix, AZ, John Postler Gregg, Miller, Balis & O’Neil, Richard M. Lorenzo, Harkins Cunningham LLP, Barbara Schneider Jost, Davis Wright Termaine LLP, James F. Moriarty, Fleischman & Walsh, Washington, DC, for Petitioners.

Cynthia Ann Marlette, Dennis Lane, Solicitor, Beth Guralnick Pacella, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Robert Phillip Charrow, Crowell & Moring, Kenneth M. Minesinger, Greenberg Traurig, Paul Brent Mohler, Heller Ehrman LLP, Douglas Lincoln Beresford, Kevin J. Lipson, Hogan & Hartson, Wash*448ington, DC, Harvey Y. Morris, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, San Francisco, CA, Frederick T. Kolb, Houston, TX, Katherine Bourke Edwards, John Paul Floom, Edwards & Associates, Alexandria, VA, John R. Ellis, Sempra Energy, Los Angeles, CA, Douglas Kent Porter, Southern California Edison Company, Rosemead, CA, for Intervenors.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and EDWARDS and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition be dismissed without prejudice to the ability of the petitioners to argue in El Paso Natural Gas Company’s pending rate proceeding, F.E.R.C. Docket No. RP05422-000, that neither the Commission’s orders in the Capacity Allocation Proceeding, *see El Paso Natural Gas Co.,*99 F.E.R.C. ¶61,244, 2002 WL 2013618 (2002) ; *El Paso Natural Gas Co.,*104 F.E.R.C. ¶61,045, 2003 WL 22222700 (2003) , nor the decision of this court in *Arizona Corp. Commission v. FERC,*397 F.3d 952 (D.C.Cir.2005), precludes the argument that El Paso caused the capacity shortfall in 2000-01 by exercising market power to withhold capacity.

Petitioners’ chief concern in bringing this case is that if they do not prevail here with respect to their non-preclusion argument, then they may be estopped from arguing in the subsequent rate proceeding that El Paso acted to withhold capacity on its pipeline. As a matter of prudence, this issue should not be resolved by the court unless it arises and is of consequence in the subsequent rate proceeding. To the extent the Commission later precludes petitioners from raising arguments they have raised in the proceeding under review, they may seek redress in this court at that time.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Exhibit 31.1

 

Rule 13a – 14(a)/15(d) – 14(a)

 

I, Gordon Samson, certify that:

 
|   | 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Primegen Energy Corp.; |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

Date:  September 30, 2006

/s/ Gordon Samson

Gordon Samson

Chief Financial Officer, Director

and Principal Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       16
#### § 726.206 Terms of policies.

A policy or contract of insurance shall be issued for the term of 1 year from the date that it becomes effective, but if such insurance be not needed except for a particular contract or operation, the term of the policy may be limited to the period of such contract or operation.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4412 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4412

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2016

 Mr. Griffith introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12740, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may reinstate the license for the project effective as of 
the date of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 
subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration.
                                 <all>
```
### §§2592a, 2592b. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–199, title IV, §403(a)(1), (b)(1), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2325

Section 2592a, Pub. L. 99–145, title X, §1002, Nov. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 705; Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title IX, §905(a), Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2032, related to submission by President of annual report to Congress on Soviet compliance with arms control commitments.

Section 2592b, Pub. L. 100–456, div. A, title IX, §906, Sept. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 2033, related to submission by President of annual report to Congress on arms control strategy of the United States.