T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E D W I N P A S C U A C A R A A N G a nd E DN A G OR OS P E C AR AA NG , P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, v. P N C M O R T G A G E ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees, a nd N A T I O N A L C I T Y M O R T G A G E ; e t a l., D efen d an t s. N o. 11- 17027 D. C . No . 1 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 5 9 4 - L E KB MK ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

H a w a ii L e s l i e E . K oba y a s hi , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B efo re: W A R D L A W , C L IF T O N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED SEP 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 17027 2 E dw i n a nd E dnaC a r a a ng appe a l the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng thei r a ct i on al l egi ng fe dera l and st at e l aw cl ai m s c hal l engi ng a non -j ud i ci al fore cl osure. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew for an ab u s e o f d is c r e tio n ad is m is s a l f o rf a ilu r e to c o m p lyw ith ac o u rt o r d e r , Ferdi k v . B on ze let , 9 6 3 F. 2 d1 2 5 8 , 1 2 6 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 2 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T h e d i stri ctco u rtd i dn o tab u se i t s d i scret i o n b y d i sm i ssi n g th e C araan g s’ ac ti o n af ter th e C ar aa n g s f

ailedto co m p ly, all eg ed ly du e to th eir c o u n se l’ s c a l e nda r i ng e rr or s , w i th a n or de rr e qui r i ng the m t o f i l e a n a m e nde d c om pl a i ntor f a c e d is m is s a l. See F ed. R . C i v. P . 41 (b) ( al l ow i ng di sm i ss alof ac t i on for f ai l ure to c o m p lyw ith c o u rt o r d e r s ) ; Fe rd ik , 963 F . 2d a t1260- 61 ( l i s t i ng f a c t or s t o gui de di sm i ss alun der Rul e 41(b)); s e e al s o Cas e yv . A lbe r t

s on’s , I nc ., 362 F . 3d 1254, 1260 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( “ pa rt i e s a r e bound bythe a c t i ons of the i rl a w y e r s , a nd al l eged att orney m alprac t i ce do es no tusual l y provi de a bas i s t o setas i de a j u d g m en t ”). D i sm i ssal fo l l o w edth e co u rt ’ s p ri o r u se o f l ess d rast i c al t ern at i v es, a n d , u n d e rth e c ir c u m s tan c e s , s e rv e db o th th e p ub lic ’s in te r e s t in e x p e d itio u s ly r e s o lv in g litig a tio n a n dth e c o u rt’s in te r e s t in m a n a g in g its d o c k e t. Se e Fe rd ik , 963 F . 2d at12 62 -63 (di sm i ss alapprop ri at e w here three ou tof fi ve fa ct ors s up po rti t ). I s s ue s nots upport e d bya r gum e nt , i nc ludi ng thos e c onc e rni ng the m e r i t s of pr i orrul i ngs di s m i s s i ng the C a r a a ngs ’ s c l a i m s f orf a i l ur e t o s t a t e ac l a i m a nd11- 17027 3 s tr ik in g th e irf

ir s t a m e n d e dc o m p la in t, ar e d e e m e dab a n d o n e d . See A m . Int ’l E nter s. , Inc. v. F

D IC , 3 F . 3d 12 63 , 12 66 n. 5 (9th C i r. 19 93 ). AF F I RME D.