alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 11.35 How does the authorized official decide whether to use type A or type B procedures? ( a ) If the authorized official determines under § 11.34 that a type A procedure is available, the authorized official must then decide whether to use that procedure or use type B procedures. The authorized official must make this decision by weighing the difficulty of collecting site-specific data against the suitability of the averaged data and simplifying assumptions in the type A procedure for the release being assessed. The authorized official may use type B procedures if they can be performed at a reasonable cost and if the increase in accuracy provided by those procedures outweighs the increase in assessment costs. Section 1, Volume I of the NRDAM/CME technical document (incorporated by reference, see § 11.18) lists the simplifying assumptions made in the NRDAM/CME. Volumes III through IV of the NRDAM/CME technical document list the data in the NRDAM/CME. Section 1, Volume I of the NRDAM/GLE technical document (incorporated by reference, see § 11.18) lists the simplifying assumptions made in the NRDAM/GLE. Volume III of the NRDAM/GLE technical document lists the data in the NRDAM/GLE.
( b ) The authorized official must use type B procedures rather than a type A procedure whenever a potentially responsible party: ( 1 ) Submits a written request for use of type B procedures along with documentation of the reasons supporting the request; and
( 2 ) Advances all reasonable costs of using type B procedures within a time frame acceptable to the authorized official.
( c ) If there is no available type A procedure, the authorized official must use type B procedures to calculate all damages.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the authorized official may change the type of procedure used in light of comments received on the Assessment Plan. [See § 11.32(e)(2) to determine if the authorized official must provide for additional public review.] However, if the authorized official decides to use type B procedures in lieu of a type A procedure, and cannot confirm exposure under § 11.37, the authorized official may not then use a type A procedure.
[61 FR 20610, May 7, 1996]
### §4805. Cooperation of other Federal agencies

#### (a) Assistance

In order to facilitate fulfillment of the responsibilities described in section 4802(a) of this title, other Federal agencies shall cooperate (through agreements) to the maximum extent possible with the Secretary of State. Such agencies may, with or without reimbursement, provide assistance to the Secretary, perform security inspections, provide logistical support relating to the differing missions and facilities of other Federal agencies, and perform other overseas security functions as may be authorized by the Secretary. Specifically, the Secretary may agree to delegate operational control of overseas security functions of other Federal agencies to the heads of such agencies, subject to the Secretary's authority as set forth in section 4802(a) of this title. The agency head receiving such delegated authority shall be responsible to the Secretary in the exercise of the delegated operational control.

#### (b) Other agencies

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to limit or impair the authority or responsibility of any other Federal, State, or local agency with respect to law enforcement, domestic security operations, or intelligence activities as defined in Executive Order 12333.

#### (c) Certain lease arrangements

The Administrator of General Services is authorized to lease (to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in appropriation Acts) such amount of space in the United States as may be necessary for the Department of State to accommodate the personnel required to carry out this subchapter. The Department of State shall pay for such space at the rate established by the Administrator of General Services for space and related services.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title I, §106, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 857.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b), was in the original "titles I through IV", meaning titles I through IV of Pub. L. 99–399, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 855, known as the Diplomatic Security Act, which are classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of titles I through IV of Pub. L. 99–399 to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4801 of this title and Tables.

Executive Order 12333, referred to in subsec. (b), is Ex. Ord. No. 12333, Dec. 4, 1981, 46 F.R. 59941, which is set out as a note under section 3001 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Todd Woods, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 12016;

Fourth District —

July 25, 1973.

John F. McNichols, Deputy Defender, of Springfield, (J. Daniel Stewart, Assistant Defender, of counsel,) for appellant.

No appearance for the People.

Opinion by Mr.

PRESIDING JUSTICE CRAVEN.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                   MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED          NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                   SEPTEMBER 30,              SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                          ---------------------------------------------------------
   in thousands, except share and per share data                1999         1998          1999           1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>             <C>          <C>
   BASIC NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
     Net income (loss)                                     $      640         ($586)    $      611         ($466)

     Weighted average common shares outstanding             6,260,443     6,213,082      6,247,778     6,173,224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic net income (loss) per common share                   $0.10        ($0.09)    $     0.10        ($0.08)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   DILUTED NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:
     Net income (loss)                                     $      640         ($586)    $      611         ($466)

     Weighted average common shares outstanding             6,260,443     6,213,082      6,247,778     6,173,224
     Effect of stock options                                     -           -              -             -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Adjusted shares outstanding                          6,260,443     6,213,082      6,247,778     6,173,224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Diluted net income (loss) per common share            $     0.10        ($0.09)    $     0.10        ($0.08)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


































                                       19
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.510 Self-evaluation. ( a ) The agency shall, within one year of the effective date of this part, evaluate, with the assistance of interested persons, including handicapped persons or organizations representing handicapped persons, its current policies and practices, and the effects thereof, that do not or may not meet the requirements of this part, and, to the extent modification of any such policies and practices is required, the agency shall proceed to make the necessary modifications.
( b ) The agency shall, for at least three years following completion of the evaluation required under paragraph (a) of this section, maintain on file and make available for public inspection— ( 1 ) A list of the interested persons consulted;
( 2 ) A description of areas examined and any problems identified; and
( 3 ) A description of any modifications made.
#### In the Matter of Louis W. Kaplan, an Attorney, Admitted under the Name of Louis Kaplan, Respondent. Brooklyn Bar Association, Petitioner.

Present—Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-K of Redpoint Bio Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, F. Raymond Salemme, Ph.D., President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



Dated: March 29, 2010

/s/ F. RAYMOND SALEMME, PH.D.* F. Raymond Salemme, Ph.D.* President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


*A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redpoint Bio Corporation and will be retained by Redpoint Bio
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---



QuickLinks
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):

                                  May 15, 2003

                                    Dice Inc.
             ------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)




      Delaware                    0-25107                    13-3899472
     ----------------       -------------------        ----------------------
     (State or Other         (Commission File            (I.R.S. Employer
     Jurisdiction of              Number)              Identification Number)
     Incorporation)


                     3 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10016
               ---------------------------------------------------
               (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)


                                 (212) 725-6550
              ----------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

<PAGE>

ITEM 5. Other Events


On May 15, 2003, Dice Inc. (the "Company"), issued a press release relating to
the approval of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
of its Disclosure Statement filed in connection with its Joint Plan of
Reorganization. A copy of the release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

         (c) Exhibits

Exhibit
Number            Description
--------          -----------

99.1              Press Release dated May 15, 2003.

<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the
Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.



                                    DICE INC.



                                    By: /s/ Brian P. Campbell
                                       -------------------------------------
                                       Name:   Brian P. Campbell
                                       Title:  Vice President and General
                                               Counsel



Dated:  May 15, 2003
§ 686.220 Who is responsible for the protection and maintenance of center facilities? ( a ) The Secretary establishes procedures for the protection and maintenance of contract center facilities owned or leased by the Department of Labor, that are consistent with the current Federal Property Management Regulations.
( b ) The U.S. Department of Agriculture, when operating Civilian Conservation Centers (CCC) on public land, is responsible for the protection and maintenance of CCC facilities.
( c ) The Secretary issues procedures for conducting periodic facility surveys of centers to determine their condition and to identify needs such as correction of safety and health deficiencies, rehabilitation, and/or new construction.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 807.94

 807.80

 806.72

 805.72

 804.72

 804.60

 804.60

 804.60

 803.70

 802.69

 801.71

 800.46

 800.31

 800.28

 800.34

 800.42

 800.50

 800.58

 800.65

 800.74

 800.82

 800.98

 801.08

 801.16

 801.23

 801.24

 801.32

 801.48

 801.55

 801.60

 801.66

 17.41

 17.31

 16.57

 15.89

 15.24

 15.16

 15.16

 15.16

 14.59

 13.96

 13.36

 12.63

 12.54

 12.52

 12.56

 12.60

 12.65

 12.70

 12.74

 12.79

 12.83

 12.93

 12.99

 13.03

 13.08

 13.08

 13.13

 13.22

 13.27

 13.30

 13.33

STORAGE

-0.03

-0.10

-0.75

-0.67

-0.66

-0.08

+0.00

+0.00

-0.58

-0.63

-0.60

-0.74

-0.09

-0.02

+0.04

+0.05

+0.05

+0.05

+0.04

+0.05

+0.05

+0.09

+0.06

+0.05

+0.04

+0.01

+0.05

+0.10

+0.04

+0.03

+0.04

CHANGE

8

-6

-85

-50

-44

0

29

29

2

-14

2

-72

37

21

46

46

42

43

41

44

44

67

51

44

41

23

44

69

41

35

37

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 15

 39

 287

 285

 283

 35

 25

 25

 288

 300

 300

 298

 80

 28

 26

 21

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

 18

OUTLET

 7

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 0

 2

 3

 0

 2

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 2

 2

 1

C.F.S.

 .33

 .19

 .18

 .18

 .20

 .18

 .19

 .21

 .18

 .17

 .10

 .04

 .03

 .10

 .09

 .09

 .01

 .12

 .15

 .01

 .09

 .18

 .14

 .12

 .11

 .10

 .10

 .14

 .09

 .09

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .02

 .06

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

OCTOBER 2007 RUN DATE: 02/07/2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -4.11 615 2,605 0 81 3.97 .71

ACRE-FEET -4,110 1,220 5,167 0 161

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 5,167

 5,167

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .71

JULY 1, 2007 1.18

 17.44

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
Exhibit
10.1


 


SUBLEASE
AGREEMENT


This
is an agreement to sublet office space located at 4700 Spring Street, Suite 304, La Mesa, California 91942 according to the terms
specified below.


 


The
sublessor agrees to sublet and the subtenant agrees to take the premises described below. Both parties agree to keep, perform
and fulfill the promises, conditions and agreements below:


 


1.
The sublessor is: BST Partners


 


2.
The subtenant is: Zander Therapeutics, Inc.


 


3.
The term of this sublease is month to month beginning November 5, 2018.


 


4.
The rent payable to the sublessor by the subtenant is equal to Six Thousand Dollars per month ($6,000) and is to be paid at such
time as specified in accordance with the original lease agreement between the sublessor and the lessor. Rent includes the use
of computer equipment, furnishings and supplies.


 


5.
All charges for utilities connected with premises are to be paid by the sublessor.


 


6.
Subtenant agrees to surrender and deliver to the sublessor the premises, computer equipment and all furniture and decorations
within the premises in as good a condition as they were at the beginning of the term, reasonable wear and tear excepted. The subtenant
will be liable to the sublessor for any damages occurring to the premises or the contents thereof or to the building which are
done by the subtenant.


 


7.
This agreement may be terminated at any time by either party by five days written notice from the terminating party to the other.
In the event that this agreement is terminated prior to the conclusion of a 30 day rental period (“Rent Month”) rent
due by the subtenant to the sublessor for that period shall be prorated for that Rent Month .


 


8.
In the event of any legal action concerning this sublease, the losing party shall pay to the prevailing party reasonable attorney’s
fees and court costs to be fixed by the court wherein such judgment shall be entered.


 


The
parties hereby bind themselves to this agreement by their signatures affixed below on this 16th day of November, 2018.


 


 


	BST
    Partners	 
	By:	/s/David
    R. Koos	 
	 	Its: Chairman and
    CEO	 
	 	 	 
	Zander
    Therapeutics, Inc.	 
	By:	/s/David
    R. Koos	 
	 	Its:Chairman and CEO
#### § 666.110 May a Governor require additional indicators of performance?

Yes, Governors may develop additional indicators of performance for adults, youth and dislocated worker activities. These indicators must be included in the State Plan. (WIA sec. 136(b)(2)(C).)
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 244 150 197

2 179 131 150

3 143 128 133

4 149 127 140

5 148 118 131

6 137 115 121

7 130 115 122

8 131 110 120

9 117 108 112

10 116 111 113

11 118 112 115

12 118 113 114

13 117 112 114

14 121 113 116

15 120 113 115

16 118 113 115

17 124 113 118

18 121 113 117

19 123 114 118

20 126 114 120

21 124 112 117

22 121 112 115

23 118 113 116

24 119 111 115

25 119 113 116

26 119 113 116

27 118 112 114

28 117 112 114

29 118 112 115

30 117 112 114

31 118 112 114

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Staten Island On The South Fork 

Mokelumne River 

Period: July 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
#### Attilio Felci, Appellant, v. Robinson-Lloyds, Ltd., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### § 1882.0-3 Authority.

Section 317(c) of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, as amended (43 U.S.C. 1744), authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to make loans to States and their political subdivisions to relieve social or economic impacts resulting from the development of Federal minerals leased under the Act of February 25, 1920 (30 U.S.C. 181 *et seq.*).
EXHIBIT 12.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

I, Adam Yan, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer of e-Future Information Technology Inc.
(the Company), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company, and I have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the periods covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit
committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                    |  |                                     
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: June 30, 2006
|                    | 
|By:                 |  | /s/ Adam Yan                        
|Name:               |  | Adam Yan                            
|Title:              |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
§ 11.30 What does the authorized official do if an assessment is warranted? ( a ) If the authorized official determines during the Preassessment Phase that an assessment is warranted, the authorized official must develop a plan for the assessment of natural resource damages.
( b ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the Assessment Plan is to ensure that the assessment is performed in a planned and systematic manner and that methodologies selected from subpart D for a type A assessment or from subpart E for a type B assessment, including the Injury Determination, Quantification, and Damage Determination phases, can be conducted at a reasonable cost, as that phrase is used in this part.
( c ) *Assessment Plan phase costs.* ( 1 ) The following categories of reasonable and necessary costs may be incurred in the Assessment Plan phase of the damage assessment: ( i ) Methodology identification and screening costs;
( ii ) Potentially responsible party notification costs;
( iii ) Public participation costs;
( iv ) Exposure confirmation analysis costs;
( v ) Preliminary estimate of damages costs; and
( vi ) Any other Assessment Plan costs for activities authorized by §§ 11.30 through 11.38.
( 2 ) The reasonable and necessary costs for these categories shall be limited to those costs incurred or anticipated by the authorized official for, and specifically allocable to, site specific efforts taken in the development of an Assessment Plan for a resource for which the agency or Indian tribe is acting as trustee. Such costs shall be supported by appropriate records and documentation, and shall not reflect regular activities performed by the agency or tribe in management of the natural resource. Activities undertaken as part of the Assessment Plan phase shall be taken in a manner that is cost-effective, as that phrase is used in this part.
[51 FR 27725, Aug. 1, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 5174, Feb. 22, 1988; 59 FR 14281, Mar. 25, 1994; 61 FR 20609, May 7, 1996]