alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         570,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  364,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               650,253
<PP&E>                                      23,947,063
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,450,768)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,952,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,341,293
<BONDS>                                      6,010,017
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,601,637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,952,947
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,362,477
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,518,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             787,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (943,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (943,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (943,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 3,475

 4,460

 5,000

 7,053

 7,439

 23,597

 42,253

 34,271

 48,717

 27,181

 21,359

 16,528

 13,674

 9,735

 9,484

 8,482

 8,784

 8,843

 7,167

 7,893

 7,953

 6,596

 7,754

 5,004

 4,715

 4,823

 5,076

 6,009

 123,820

 120,930

 119,121

 117,915

 118,720

 119,851

 136,275

 169,602

 193,679

 230,276

 244,584

 252,646

 255,716

 255,920

 252,372

 248,764

 244,383

 240,509

 236,884

 231,849

 227,755

 223,922

 218,992

 215,409

 209,392

 203,402

 197,814

 192,745

 402,705

 404,610

 405,879

 405,032

 403,841

 386,552

 351,472

 326,127

 287,604

 272,543

 264,057

 260,826

 260,610

 264,345

 268,144

 272,754

 276,833

 280,648

 285,949

 290,258

 294,292

 299,482

 303,254

 309,587

 315,893

 321,775

 327,110

 331,246

 573,452

 590,568

 606,870

 620,023

 632,577

 619,257

 575,570

 545,676

 491,457

 475,423

 470,021

 473,555

 482,442

 498,766

 515,479

 534,053

 551,894

 569,491

 590,427

 609,658

 628,608

 650,355

 669,341

 694,342

 719,730

 744,587

 768,578

 790,087

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2015 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: April 8, 2015

 127,295

 125,390

 124,121

 124,968

 126,159

 143,448

 178,528

 203,873

 242,396

 257,457

 265,943

 269,174

 269,390

 265,655

 261,856

 257,246

 253,167

 249,352

 244,051

 239,742

 235,708

 230,518

 226,746

 220,413

 214,107

 208,225

 202,890

 198,754

 726,548

 709,432

 693,130

 679,977

 667,423

 680,743

 724,430

 754,324

 808,543

 824,577

 829,979

 826,445

 817,558

 801,234

 784,521

 765,947

 748,106

 730,509

 709,573

 690,342

 671,392

 649,645

 630,659

 605,658

 580,270

 555,413

 531,422

 509,913

 3,825,000

 3,843,000

 3,859,000

 3,872,000

 3,885,000

 3,871,000

 3,828,000

 3,798,000

 3,743,000

 3,727,000

 3,722,000

 3,726,000

 3,734,000

 3,751,000

 3,767,000

 3,786,000

 3,804,000

 3,821,000

 3,842,000

 3,862,000

 3,881,000

 3,902,000

 3,921,000

 3,946,000

 3,972,000

 3,997,000

 4,021,000

 4,042,000

 1.4240

 1.4596

 1.4952

 1.5308

 1.5664

 1.6020

 1.6376

 1.6732

 1.7088

 1.7444

 1.7800

 1.8156

 1.8512

 1.8868

 1.9224

 1.9580

 1.9936

 2.0292

 2.0648

 2.1004

 2.1360

 2.1716

 2.2072

 2.2428

 2.2784

 2.3140

 2.3496

 2.3852

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 130,337
#### § 681.300 How does the Department define the “requires additional assistance to enter or complete an educational program, or to secure and hold employment” criterion in this part for OSY?

Either the State or the local level may establish definitions and eligibility documentation requirements for the “requires additional assistance to enter or complete an educational program, or to secure and hold employment” criterion of § 681.210(c)(9). In cases where the State WDB establishes State policy on this criterion, the State WDB must include the definition in the State Plan. In cases where the State WDB does not establish a policy, the Local WDB must establish a policy in its local plan if using this criterion.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

AUBERINO L. WILSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 848

[ February 15, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Dan L. Vaughn , Judge; L.T. Case No. 562011CF003690A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Jessica A. De Vera, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

W ARNER

, L EVINE and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 222.12

 222.79

 222.58

 223.37

 222.49

 222.43

 222.93

 223.14

 222.98

 223.12

 222.61

 221.50

 221.96

 221.62

 222.50

 222.94

 221.96

 221.54

 221.78

 223.28

 222.88

 223.41

 223.68

 222.91

 222.55

 223.00

 222.64

 223.41

 222.85

 222.91

 222.24

 48,703

 50,486

 49,926

 52,035

 49,687

 49,527

 50,859

 51,420

 50,993

 51,367

 50,006

 47,073

 48,282

 47,388

 49,713

 50,886

 48,282

 47,178

 47,809

 51,794

 50,726

 52,142

 52,866

 50,806

 49,847

 51,046

 50,086

 52,142

 50,646

 50,806

 49,022

STORAGE

+711

+1,783

-560

+2,109

-2,348

-160

+1,332

+561

-427

+374

-1,361

-2,933

+1,209

-894

+2,325

+1,173

-2,604

-1,104

+631

+3,985

-1,068

+1,416

+724

-2,060

-959

+1,199

-960

+2,056

-1,496

+160

-1,784

CHANGE

1,136

892

918

1,231

1,297

1,350

1,530

1,590

1,619

1,856

1,961

1,999

2,082

2,123

2,165

2,096

1,981

1,901

2,159

2,269

2,396

2,399

2,249

1,913

2,132

2,142

2,338

2,415

2,321

1,945

1,895

PUMPING

 4,377

 1,903

 4,842

 4,322

 4,106

 3,663

 3,148

 3,954

 4,090

 4,235

 4,263

 4,700

 4,293

 3,319

 3,203

 3,648

 3,978

 4,093

 4,365

 4,092

 3,602

 1,288

 3,388

 2,748

 4,520

 3,623

 4,032

 3,236

 3,536

 3,989

 4,240

PUMPING

 3,486

 4,830

 3,812

 2,210

 3,898

 3,770

 3,470

 2,698

 2,695

 1,155

 962

 1,376

 1,549

 1,533

 2,301

 960

 1,920

 1,917

 1,146

 0

 3,259

 4,602

 2,877

 3,502

 763

 763

 2,767

 2,004

 1,145

 763

 763

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

GEN.

*

+33

+379

+442

+287

+30

+4

+209

+43

-20

+82

-58

-164

+64

-804

+881

+165

-188

+34

-171

+393

-73

+188

+166

-6

-73

+51

-73

-19

-108

-29

+119

OR

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL O'NEILL FOREBAY December 7, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2018 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE GEN.

ACRE-FEET O'NEILL

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +1,030 58,300 0 68,896 116,796 +1,784

ACRE-FEET +1,030 115,638 0 136,655 231,665

SUMMARY

 465

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

O'NEILL GEN. 0

SAN LUIS PUMP 136,655 465

 47,992

DOS AMIGOS PUMP 231,665

DELIVERIES 

S. LUIS O'NEILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,180

 739

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 577

 2,496

 4,951

CALIF. DOS AMIGOS

AQUEDUCT

7,052

6,360

7,012

6,077

5,492

5,999

5,551

5,303

4,971

3,642

2,636

2,762

4,306

3,083

3,630

2,938

2,791

2,338

3,103

3,439

4,001

4,018

4,215

3,304

2,741

2,798

4,050

3,880

1,714

2,917

1,747

 123,870

 245,696

S. LUIS

DELIV.

GAINS(+)

LOSS(-)

C.F.S.

INFLOW - C.F.S.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

TOTAL 368,785

 3,539

* DAILY DEL. FIGURES UNAVAILABLE. TOT. DEL. IS INCLUDED IN COMPUTING MONTHLY TOTALS 

Table 18
(No. 5948

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Various Agencies, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 15, 1972.*

Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §702. Arrest of offenders

Upon a specific or general request of the officer commanding any friendly foreign force, having service courts of appropriate jurisdiction within the United States, it shall be lawful for any person in the civil, military, or naval establishments of the United States having authority to arrest, summarily to arrest any member of such force designated in such request and to deliver him to the custody of any officer of such force or to the custody of the military or naval authorities of the United States who shall deliver him forthwith to the custody of an officer of such force, for trial in such service courts within the United States for such offenses as shall lie within the jurisdiction of the service courts of such friendly foreign force: Provided, That the trial of any member of such friendly foreign force for an offense against a member of the civilian population shall be in open court (except where security consideration forbids), shall take place promptly in the United States and within a reasonable distance from the place where the offense is alleged to have been committed, for the convenience of witnesses.

(June 30, 1944, ch. 326, §2, 58 Stat. 643.)
### §§93 to 96. Repealed. Pub. L. 85–857, §14(16), (23), (25), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1269, 1270

Section 93, act Aug. 18, 1894, ch. 301, §1, 28 Stat. 412, required classification and provided for compensation of officers and employees of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers.

Section 94, act Aug. 18, 1894, ch. 301, §1, 28 Stat. 412, related to bonds of general treasurer and treasurers of branch homes.

Section 95, act June 6, 1900, ch. 791, §1, 31 Stat. 636, related to performance of duties of general treasurer by assistant general treasurer and assistant inspector general.

Act July 1, 1898, ch. 546, 30 Stat. 597, which was set out as a note under section 95 of this title, authorized appointment of a clerk to perform duties of general treasurer in his absence, and was repealed by Pub. L. 85–857, §14(20), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1270.

Section 96, act Mar. 3, 1901, ch. 853, §1, 31 Stat. 1178, provided for designation of an officer to act in absence of treasurer or quartermaster at any of branch homes of National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Jan. 1, 1959, see section 2 of Pub. L. 85–857, set out as a note preceding Part I of Title 38, Veterans' Benefits.
§ 677.205 What performance indicators apply to local areas and what information must be included in local area performance reports? ( a ) Each local area in a State under WIOA title I is subject to the same primary indicators of performance for the core programs for WIOA title I under § 677.155(a)(1) and (c) that apply to the State.
( b ) In addition to the indicators described in paragraph (a) of this section, under § 677.165, the Governor may apply additional indicators of performance to local areas in the State.
( c ) States must annually make local area performance reports available to the public using a template that the Departments of Labor and Education will disseminate in guidance, including by electronic means. The State must provide electronic access to the public local area performance report in its annual State performance report.
( d ) The local area performance report must include: ( 1 ) The actual results achieved under § 677.155 and the information required under § 677.160(a);
( 2 ) The percentage of a local area's allotment under WIOA secs. 128(b) and 133(b) that the local area spent on administrative costs; and
( 3 ) Other information that facilitates comparisons of programs with programs in other local areas (or planning regions if the local area is part of a planning region).
( e ) The disaggregation of data for the local area performance report must be done in compliance with WIOA sec. 116(d)(6)(C).
( f ) States must comply with any requirements from sec. 116(d)(3) of WIOA as explained in guidance, including the use of the performance reporting template, issued by DOL.
§ 355.32 Location of hearing. ( a ) The hearing may be held— ( 1 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the defendant resides or transacts business;
( 2 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the claim or statement in issue was made; or
( 3 ) In such other place as may be agreed upon by the defendant and the ALJ.
( b ) Each party shall have the opportunity to present argument with respect to the location of the hearing.
( c ) The hearing shall be held at the place and at the time ordered by the ALJ.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4367 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to end the increased Federal 

funding for Medicaid expansion with respect to inmates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2016 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to end the 

increased Federal funding for Medicaid expansion with 

respect to inmates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATING PPACA ENHANCED MEDICAID 

4 FMAP FOR PRISONERS. 

5 Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1396d) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (y)(2)(A), by adding at the 

8 end the following: ‘‘For items and services furnished 

9 on or after January 1, 2020, such term does not in10 clude an individual described in such subparagraph 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4367 IH

1 during the period in which the individual is an in2 mate in a public institution and is a patient in a 

3 medical institution.’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (z)(2)(A), by adding at the 

5 end the following: ‘‘For calendar quarters beginning 

6 on or after January 1, 2020, the preceding sentence 

7 shall not apply with respect to medical assistance for 

8 individuals who are inmates in a public institution 

9 and patients in a medical institution.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §6415. Programs and allocations of funds by United States missions abroad

It is the sense of the Congress that—

(1) United States diplomatic missions in countries the governments of which engage in or tolerate violations of the internationally recognized right to freedom of religion should develop, as part of annual program planning, a strategy to promote respect for the internationally recognized right to freedom of religion; and

(2) in allocating or recommending the allocation of funds or the recommendation of candidates for programs and grants funded by the United States Government, United States diplomatic missions should give particular consideration to those programs and candidates deemed to assist in the promotion of the right to religious freedom.

(Pub. L. 105–292, title I, §106, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2796.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.65

 130.76

 130.87

 130.83

 130.85

 130.76

 130.62

 130.76

 130.70

 130.82

 130.75

 130.89

 130.92

 130.75

 130.81

 130.72

 130.58

 130.45

 130.69

 130.78

 130.73

 130.72

 130.84

 130.88

 130.82

 130.91

 130.89

 130.76

 130.83

 130.76

 130.75

 650

 663

 675

 670

 673

 663

 646

 663

 656

 669

 662

 677

 680

 662

 668

 658

 642

 628

 655

 665

 659

 658

 671

 676

 669

 679

 677

 663

 670

 663

 662

STORAGE

+19

+13

+12

-5

+3

-10

-17

+17

-7

+13

-7

+15

+3

-18

+6

-10

-16

-14

+27

+10

-6

-1

+13

+5

-7

+10

-2

-14

+7

-7

-1

CHANGE

653

652

633

629

631

631

638

646

651

657

674

696

711

714

736

747

737

679

629

638

652

643

664

689

666

635

620

625

628

631

664

INFLOW

 56

 54

 52

 50

 50

 52

 55

 55

 62

 63

 63

 63

 58

 50

 45

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 586

 590

 574

 581

 578

 583

 591

 580

 591

 586

 614

 624

 650

 672

 687

 708

 701

 642

 571

 589

 611

 600

 612

 642

 626

 586

 577

 588

 580

 591

 621

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .39

 .28

 .40

 .30

 .37

 .31

 .30

 .43

 .45

 .42

 .37

 .39

 .41

 .37

 .29

 .36

 .31

 .25

 .30

 .31

 .32

 .28

 .56

 .39

 .32

 .35

 .34

 .32

 .31

 .29

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2012 RUN DATE: 08/02/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +31 20,499 18,932 1,516 34 10.73 .00

ACRE-FEET +31 40,660 37,552 3,007 67

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,007

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 37,552

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2012 .00

 631

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LAMONT J. DAVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2240

[October 11, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Gary L. Sweet, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562010CF000850A.

Lamont J. Davis, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20652

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CHARLES WILLIE WILLIAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-90-CR-330-3

- - - - - - - - - -

July 16, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Willie William appeals the denial of his § 2255 motion

to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence. William argues that his

indictment was defective because it lacked the phrase “in relation

to” and that his factual basis was insufficient to support his

guilty plea. William did not raise these issues in the district

court and, hence, they are reviewed only for plain error. See

United States v. Spires, 79 F.3d 464, 465-66 (5th Cir. 1996);

United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en

banc). 

William’s indictment was sufficient because the indictment
No. 98-20652

-2-

referenced the statute to increase clarity. See United States v.

Hernandez, 891 F.2d 521, 523-25 (5th Cir. 1989). William’s next

argument was raised in a prior § 2255 and is barred by the doctrine

of law of the case. See United States v. McClain, 593 F.2d 658,

664 (5th Cir. 1979).

AFFIRMED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 22, 2020. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 22, 2020 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0357. ACCELERATED CLAIMS, INC. v. HOWELL & JOHNSON, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: SU17CV0737
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-7157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KIERON MATTHEW WILLIAMS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cr-00596-GLR-1)

Submitted: February 8, 2024 Decided: April 8, 2024

Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kieron Matthew Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7157 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/08/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Kieron Matthew Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A).* Upon review of the record, we 

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Williams’ motion. 

See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order. United States v. Williams, No. 1:14-cr-00596-

GLR-1 (D. Md. Sept. 13, 2022). We deny Williams’ motions for summary disposition. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

* This court vacated the district court’s prior order denying Williams’ motion for 

compassionate release and remanded for further proceedings to ensure that the court’s 

explanation of its decision “‘allow[ed] for meaningful appellate review’ in light of the 

particular circumstances of the case.” United States v. Williams, No. 21-7124, 2022 WL 

3543326, at *1 (4th Cir. Aug. 18, 2022) (quoting United States v. High, 997 F.3d 181, 188

(4th Cir. 2021)).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7157 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/08/2024 Pg: 2 of 2