alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 824.72

 824.88

 825.18

 825.34

 825.47

 825.55

 825.62

 825.69

 825.74

 825.78

 825.82

 825.90

 826.22

 827.01

 827.30

 827.47

 827.59

 827.70

 829.65

 831.00

 830.90

 831.63

 831.22

 830.70

 830.69

 831.32

 831.70

 831.42

 831.64

 831.65

 831.56

 31.66

 31.82

 32.12

 32.29

 32.42

 32.50

 32.57

 32.64

 32.69

 32.73

 32.78

 32.86

 33.19

 34.00

 34.31

 34.49

 34.61

 34.73

 36.82

 38.31

 38.20

 39.02

 38.56

 37.98

 37.97

 38.67

 39.10

 38.78

 39.03

 39.04

 38.94

STORAGE

+0.03

+0.16

+0.30

+0.16

+0.13

+0.08

+0.07

+0.07

+0.05

+0.04

+0.04

+0.08

+0.33

+0.82

+0.31

+0.18

+0.13

+0.12

+2.10

+1.49

-0.11

+0.82

-0.46

-0.58

-0.01

+0.70

+0.43

-0.32

+0.25

+0.01

-0.10

CHANGE

36

100

174

102

87

61

57

57

46

40

42

62

188

433

174

110

85

79

1,545

2,859

3,625

2,220

710

416

674

2,962

1,725

1,148

834

687

630

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 1,437

 3,110

 1,126

 260

 26

 20

 1,948

 848

 646

 48

 20

 20

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 469

 672

 571

 681

 681

 681

 660

 660

 660

 660

 660

 660

 660

OUTLET

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 2

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .04

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .03

INCHES

 .02

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .55

 .64

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .33

 1.35

 1.45

 1.65

 .64

 .07

 .00

 .76

 1.21

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .27

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2010 RUN DATE: 07/27/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +7.32 21,968 8,375 9,889 18 .53 9.26

ACRE-FEET +7,320 43,574 16,612 19,615 36

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 19,615

OUTLET

TOTAL

 16,612

 36,227

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 9.26

JULY 1, 2009 15.45

 31.63

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 OFFICERS CERTIFICATE  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
              By:
    /s/ Robert A. ZummoRobert A. ZummoChief Executive Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer 
 *
    
    The introductory portion of paragraph 4 of the Section 302 certification that refers to the
certifying officers responsibility for establishing and maintaining internal control over
financial reporting for the company, as well as paragraph 4(b), have been omitted in accordance
with Release Nos. 33-8618 and 34-52492 (September 22, 2005) because the compliance period has been
extended for small business issuers until the first fiscal year ending on or after July 15, 2007.
#### Novak & Wolf Company, Defendant in Error, v. Vicenzo Cutia, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 17,297.

Account, action *on*— sufficiency *of evidence.*In an action on account, evidence held not to sustain a judgment for the plaintiff.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. J. D. Tubnbaugh, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at' the March term, 1911.

Reversed.

Opinion filed October 1, 1912.

O’Donnell & O’Donnell, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

. A writ of error was taken out, bringing to this court for review a judgment entered against the plaintiff in error and in favor of the defendant in error in the *182sum of $200. No appearance was entered by the defendant in error in this court.

It seems that Cutia, the defendant, had been dealing with the Novak *&*Wolf Company for some time. On December 14, 1910, an account was rendered showing payments made October 18th and 28th and November 28th, the first two payments being for $26.50 each, and the third one for $50. These were all made to one Joseph Richardo, who had taken the orders from Cutia. The evidence further shows that the sum of $200 was paid to Richardo on December 3rd.

The contention of the defendant in error in the court below was that Richardo was unauthorized to collect money. It was admitted that he had been accustomed to collect money and had turned over the three payments mentioned to his employer. It was attempted to be shown that some sort of notice had been given to Cutia to the effect that Richardo was no longer the agent of the Novak & Wolf Company. This attempt, however, failed.

It is impossible to read the record without coming to the conclusion that the judgment entered was erroneous, and we presume for that reason the Novak & Wolf Company did not follow the case to this court.

The judgment must be reversed.

*Reversed.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,050.70

 1,051.70

 1,052.79

 1,053.91

 1,054.98

 1,056.05

 1,056.66

 1,057.14

 1,057.46

 1,057.75

 1,058.12

 1,058.55

 1,058.98

 1,059.47

 1,059.96

 1,060.44

 1,060.91

 1,061.28

 1,061.66

 1,062.16

 1,062.52

 1,062.96

 1,063.27

 1,063.64

 1,063.85

 1,063.98

 1,064.14

 1,064.24

 1,064.33

 1,064.29

 1,064.13

 4,082.5

 4,110.4

 4,140.9

 4,172.4

 4,202.7

 4,233.1

 4,250.5

 4,264.3

 4,273.4

 4,281.8

 4,292.4

 4,304.8

 4,317.2

 4,331.4

 4,345.6

 4,359.5

 4,373.1

 4,383.8

 4,394.8

 4,409.4

 4,419.9

 4,432.8

 4,441.9

 4,452.7

 4,458.9

 4,462.7

 4,467.4

 4,470.3

 4,473.0

 4,471.8

 4,467.1

STORAGE

+25.2

+27.9

+30.5

+31.5

+30.3

+30.4

+17.4

+13.7

+9.2

+8.3

+10.6

+12.4

+12.4

+14.2

+14.2

+13.9

+13.6

+10.7

+11.0

+14.6

+10.5

+12.9

+9.1

+10.9

+6.2

+3.8

+4.7

+2.9

+2.7

-1.2

-4.7

CHANGE

 20,989

 19,615

 18,953

 17,971

 17,796

 17,841

 17,161

 16,334

 15,424

 15,011

 15,389

 15,593

 14,926

 15,224

 15,400

 16,232

 15,989

 14,968

 17,353

 18,177

 16,456

 17,174

 16,023

 14,565

 12,719

 11,700

 11,936

 11,358

 11,184

 9,358

 8,324

INFLOW

 8,028

 5,299

 3,273

 1,877

 2,273

 2,294

 8,120

 9,221

 8,376

 8,927

 7,748

 9,090

 8,389

 7,834

 7,957

 8,972

 8,849

 9,294

 11,492

 10,761

 10,948

 10,601

 11,329

 9,014

 9,535

 9,517

 9,404

 9,638

 9,620

 9,726

 10,459

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,157

 1,618

 1,951

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 237

 271

 297

 207

 267

 209

 260

 193

 261

 270

 329

 254

 288

 238

 289

 256

 282

 257

 292

 77

 207

 95

 112

 78

 78

 260

 156

 234

 226

 226

 243

C.F.S.

 .29

 .33

 .36

 .25

 .32

 .25

 .31

 .23

 .31

 .32

 .39

 .30

 .34

 .28

 .34

 .30

 .33

 .30

 .34

 .09

 .24

 .11

 .13

 .09

 .09

 .30

 .18

 .27

 .26

 .26

 .28

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .46

 .21

 .48

 .11

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 10, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +409.8 477,143 257,865 0 5,726 6,949 8.19 1.30

ACRE-FEET +409,800 946,413 511,475 0 11,358 13,783

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 511,475

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 11,358

 522,833

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.30

JULY 1, 2005 87.29

 4,057.3

Table 3
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of Platinum Energy Resources,
Inc.  (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lisa
Meier, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and Director, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)
                The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
 
 (2)
                The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Dated:
      May 29, 2009
                /s/
      Lisa MeierLisa
      MeierChief
      Financial Officer and
Treasurer
  This
certification shall not be deemed to be “filed” for the purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not
be incorporated by reference into any registration statement filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as
being incorporated therein by reference.
#### Dorelia Carmilina Nova PLEITEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-76287.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Robert G. Berke, Esq., Berke Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, David V. Bernal, Regina Byrd, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Melvin Lublinski, U.S. Department of Justice, New York, NY, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Dorelia Carmilina Nova Pleitez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming an immigration judge’s order denying her motion to reopen her deportation proceedings conducted in absentia. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion, *Singh v. INS,*213 F.3d *7701050, 1052 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and remand for further proceedings.

The BIA correctly concluded that petitioner received sufficient notice of her hearing because it is undisputed that she was personally served with an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) that contained notice of her hearing and was written in both English and Spanish. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, there was no statutory requirement that the OSC be orally translated. *See*8 U.S.C. 1252b(a)(3) (repealed 1996). Accordingly, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in refusing to rescind petitioner’s deportation order.

Relying on the BIA’s decision *In re M-S-*22 I. & N. Dec. 349 (BIA 1998) (en banc), petitioner contends that even if her deportation order is not rescinded, her motion to reopen should nevertheless be granted to address her eligibility for adjustment of status. *Id.*at 353-55. (distinguishing motions to reopen for purposes of rescinding an in absentia deportation order from motions to reopen to apply for adjustment of status). As the BIA’s decision does not address petitioner’s motion to reopen insofar as she seeks to apply for adjustment of status, we remand for further proceedings. *See Yepes-Prado v. INS,*10 F.3d 1363, 1370 (9th Cir.1993) (“BIA acts arbitrarily when it disregards its own precedents and policies without giving a reasonable explanation for doing so”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part; REMANDED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 838.96

 839.03

 839.11

 839.23

 839.33

 838.77

 838.23

 837.73

 837.74

 838.11

 838.71

 839.20

 839.44

 838.76

 837.95

 838.15

 838.40

 838.63

 838.84

 839.06

 839.25

 839.44

 839.61

 839.78

 839.95

 840.12

 840.49

 840.67

 840.46

 840.33

 840.32

 47.77

 47.86

 47.96

 48.11

 48.24

 47.53

 46.86

 46.24

 46.25

 46.71

 47.46

 48.08

 48.38

 47.52

 46.51

 46.76

 47.07

 47.36

 47.62

 47.90

 48.14

 48.38

 48.60

 48.81

 49.03

 49.25

 49.72

 49.96

 49.69

 49.52

 49.51

STORAGE

+0.08

+0.09

+0.10

+0.15

+0.13

-0.71

-0.68

-0.62

+0.01

+0.46

+0.75

+0.62

+0.30

-0.86

-1.01

+0.25

+0.31

+0.29

+0.26

+0.28

+0.24

+0.24

+0.22

+0.22

+0.22

+0.22

+0.48

+0.23

-0.27

-0.17

-0.01

CHANGE

376

376

385

411

398

292

293

321

346

357

436

369

342

208

132

227

211

190

181

188

170

171

159

159

161

157

285

163

73

124

129

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 309

 302

 302

 302

 302

 617

 602

 602

 308

 94

 25

 25

 157

 613

 613

 70

 26

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 17

 15

 15

 15

 178

 178

 106

OUTLET

 9

 10

 12

 12

 12

 11

 12

 13

 11

 12

 12

 12

 12

 8

 10

 11

 8

 10

 13

 13

 14

 14

 15

 15

 15

 12

 11

 11

 12

 11

 9

C.F.S.

 .22

 .25

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .28

 .31

 .32

 .29

 .30

 .29

 .30

 .29

 .20

 .25

 .28

 .20

 .26

 .33

 .32

 .35

 .36

 .37

 .37

 .36

 .30

 .26

 .27

 .30

 .28

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 RUN DATE: 06/14/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.82 7,790 5,898 620 362 9.02 .01

ACRE-FEET +1,820 15,451 11,699 1,230 718

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,230

OUTLET

TOTAL

 11,699

 12,929

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2016 26.43

 47.70

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 26.43
Exhibit 99.3
                                                                  ------------

                      ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                    AAMES MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2005-2



The undersigned, Mark A. Bragg, Director of Aames Capital Corporation (the
"Servicer"), in its capacity as Servicer under that certain Transfer and
Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2005 (the "Agreement") does hereby
certify for the year ended December 31, 2005:

         (i)  a review of the activities of the Servicer for the year
              ended December 31, 2005 and of its performance under the
              Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

         (ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
              Servicer has fulfilled all of its material obligations under
              the Agreement throughout such year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereto signed my name as of this 23rd day of
March, 2006.

                                /s/ Mark A. Bragg
                                ---------------------
                                Mark A. Bragg
                                Director, National Loan Servicing
### §1015. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 88–464, §5, Aug. 20, 1964, 78 Stat. 563, which authorized the Secretary of the Interior to prescribe rules and regulations to carry out the provisions of this subchapter, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
<PAGE>

                             [Cover-All Letterhead]


                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, John W. Roblin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Registrant"), certify that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 of the
Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

/s/ John W. Roblin
------------------------------
Name:    John W. Roblin
Date:    August 14, 2002
### [§§410, 411. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, §31109(e), (f), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 757]

Section 410, added Pub. L. 100–690, title IX, §9002(a), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4521; amended Pub. L. 101–516, title III, §336, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2186; Pub. L. 102–240, title II, §2004(a), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 2073; Pub. L. 102–388, title VI, §§601–606, Oct. 6, 1992, 106 Stat. 1569, 1570; Pub. L. 104–59, title III, §324, Nov. 28, 1995, 109 Stat. 591; Pub. L. 105–18, title II, §8003, June 12, 1997, 111 Stat. 195; Pub. L. 105–130, §6(b), Dec. 1, 1997, 111 Stat. 2558; Pub. L. 105–178, title II, §2004(a), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 328; Pub. L. 108–88, §6(e)(1), Sept. 30, 2003, 117 Stat. 1120; Pub. L. 108–310, §6(e)(1), Sept. 30, 2004, 118 Stat. 1152; Pub. L. 109–59, title II, §2007(a), (b), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1529; Pub. L. 110–244, title III, §303(c)(2), (3), June 6, 2008, 122 Stat. 1619; Pub. L. 111–147, title IV, §421(f)(1), Mar. 18, 2010, 124 Stat. 85; Pub. L. 112–30, title I, §121(f)(1), Sept. 16, 2011, 125 Stat. 347, related to alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures.

Section 411, added Pub. L. 105–178, title II, §2005(a), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 332; amended Pub. L. 110–244, title III, §303(c)(4), June 6, 2008, 122 Stat. 1619, related to State highway safety data improvements.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.

#### Repeal of Programs

Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, §31109(a), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 756, provided that: "A repeal made by this section [repealing sections 406 to 408, 410, and 411 of this title and repealing provisions set out as notes under sections 402, 403, and 405 of this title] shall not affect amounts apportioned or allocated before the effective date of such repeal [Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title], provided that such apportioned or allocated funds continue to be subject to the requirements to which such funds were subject under the repealed section as in effect on the day before the date of the repeal."
EXHIBIT 32.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                MARWICH II, LTD.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Porath,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
-------------------------
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2006
### §3642. Appointment and compensation; duties

#### (a) Officers and employees

In accordance with this part, the Commission may appoint, fix the compensation of, and define the authority and duties of officers and employees (other than the Administrator and Deputy Administrator) necessary for the management, operation, and maintenance of the Panama Canal and its complementary works, installations, and equipment.

#### (b) Eligibility to serve as officer or employee of Commission

Individuals serving in any Executive agency (other than the Commission) or the Smithsonian Institution, including individuals in the uniformed services, may, if appointed under this section or section 3614 of this title, serve as officers or employees of the Commission.

#### (c) Salary protection

In the case of an individual who is an officer or employee of the Commission on November 17, 1997, and who has not had a break in service with the Commission since that date, the rate of basic pay for that officer or employee may not be less than the rate in effect for that officer or employee on that date except—

(1) as provided in a collective bargaining agreement;

(2) as a result of an adverse action against the officer or employee; or

(3) pursuant to a voluntary demotion.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1202, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 461; Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3526, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2861; Pub. L. 105–85, div. C, title XXXV, §3523(b), Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2065; Pub. L. 105–261, div. C, title XXXV, §3512(a)(1), Oct. 17, 1998, 112 Stat. 2271.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–261, §3512(a)(1)(C), which directed substitution of "that date" for "the day before the date of enactment", was executed by making the substitution for "the day before that date of enactment" before "except" in introductory provisions to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

Pub. L. 105–261, §3512(a)(1)(A), (B), in introductory provisions, substituted "November 17, 1997," for "the day before the date of the enactment of the Panama Canal Transition Facilitation Act of 1997" and struck out "on or after that date" after "pay for that officer or employee".

1997—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–85 added subsec. (c).

1996—Pub. L. 104–201 amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) In accordance with this part, the Panama Canal Commission may appoint without regard to the provisions of title 5, relating to appointments in the competitive service, fix the compensation of, and define the authority and duties of, officers, agents, attorneys, and employees (other than the Administrator, Deputy Administrator, and Chief Engineer) necessary for the management, operation, and maintenance of the Panama Canal and its complementary works, installations, and equipment.

"(b) Individuals serving in any Executive agency (other than the Commission) or the Smithsonian Institution, including individuals serving in the uniformed services, may, if appointed under this section or section 3613 or 3614 of this title, serve as officers or employees of the Commission."