alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4596 

AN ACT 

To ensure that small business providers of broadband Internet access service can devote resources to broadband 

deployment rather than compliance with cumbersome 

regulatory requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4596 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business 

3 Broadband Deployment Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO ENHANCEMENT TO TRANSPARENCY 

5 REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The enhancements to the trans7 parency rule of the Federal Communications Commission 

8 under section 8.3 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, 

9 as described in paragraphs 162 through 184 of the Report 

10 and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order of 

11 the Federal Communications Commission with regard to 

12 protecting and promoting the open Internet (adopted Feb13 ruary 26, 2015) (FCC 15–24), shall not apply to any 

14 small business. 

15 (b) SUNSET.—Subsection (a) shall not have any force 

16 or effect after the date that is 5 years after the date of 

17 the enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) REPORT BY FCC.—Not later than 180 days after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Commu20 nications Commission shall submit to the Committee on 

21 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 

22 and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transpor23 tation of the Senate a report that contains the rec24 ommendations of the Commission (and data supporting 

25 such recommendations) regarding— 
3 

•HR 4596 EH

1 (1) whether the exception provided by sub2 section (a) should be made permanent; and 

3 (2) whether the definition of the term ‘‘small 

4 business’’ for purposes of such exception should be 

5 modified from the definition in subsection (d)(2). 

6 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.— 

8 The term ‘‘broadband Internet access service’’ has 

9 the meaning given such term in section 8.2 of title 

10 47, Code of Federal Regulations. 

11 (2) SMALL BUSINESS.—The term ‘‘small busi12 ness’’ means any provider of broadband Internet ac13 cess service that has not more than 250,000 sub14 scribers. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4596 

AN ACT 

To ensure that small business providers of 

ments. compliance with cumbersome regulatory requiresources to broadband deployment rather than broadband Internet access service can devote re-
§ 666.140 Which individuals receiving services are included in the core indicators of performance? ( a ) ( 1 ) The core indicators of performance apply to all individuals who are registered under 20 CFR 663.105 and 664.215 for the adult, dislocated worker and youth programs, except for those adults and dislocated workers who participate exclusively in self-service or informational activities. (WIA sec. 136(b)(2)(A).)
( 2 ) Self-service and informational activities are those core services that are made available and accessible to the general public, that are designed to inform and educate individuals about the labor market and their employment strengths, weaknesses, and the range of services appropriate to their situation, and that do not require significant staff involvement with the individual in terms of resources or time.
( b ) For registered participants, a standardized record that includes appropriate performance information must be maintained in accordance with WIA section 185(a)(3).
( c ) Performance will be measured on the basis of results achieved by registered participants, and will reflect services provided under WIA title I, subtitle B programs for adults, dislocated workers and youth. Performance may also take into account services provided to participants by other One-Stop partner programs and activities, to the extent that the local MOU provides for the sharing of participant information.
#### § 641.505 When is eligibility determined?

Initial eligibility is determined at the time individuals apply to participate in the SCSEP. Once individuals become SCSEP participants, the grantee or sub-recipient is responsible for verifying their continued eligibility at least once every 12 months. Grantees and sub-recipients may also verify an individual's eligibility as circumstances require, including instances when enrollment is delayed.
§ 704.001 Extensions covered by this part. ( a ) Defense Base Act (DBA).
( b ) District of Columbia Workmen's Compensation Act (DCCA).
( c ) Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA).
( d ) Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities Act (NFIA).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 7 , 2018

Order 

Clerk

March 7, 2018

153829(53)

DAVID J. MCQUEER,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 153829

v COA: 325619

Grand Traverse CC: 2014-030287-NO

PERFECT FENCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief submitted on 

February 28, 2018, is accepted for filing.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 184 (Thursday, September 23, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21365]



[[Page 57005]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Request for Public Review and Comment of Changes to the Navstar 
GPS Space Segment/User Segment L5 Interface Specification (IS)

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Notice and request for review/comment of changes to IS-GPS-705.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice informs the public that the Global Positioning 
System (GPS) Joint Program Office (JPO) proposes to revise IS-GPS-705, 
Navstar GPS Space Segment/User Segment L5 Interfaces. This proposal is 
designated as PIRN-705-001. One of the main subjects of this revision 
effort is an introduction of new Improved Clock & Ephemeris (ICE) 
navigation message that will be broadcast with L5 signal. The proposal 
can be viewed and downloaded at the following Web site: http://gps.losangeles.af.mil. Click on ``System Engineering'', then ``Public 
Interface Control Working Group (ICWG)''. Reviewers should save the 
document to a local memory location prior to opening and performing the 
review.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments to SMC/GPERC, 2420 Vela Way, Suite 1467, El 
Segundo CA 90245-4659. A comment matrix is provided for your 
convenience at the web site and is the preferred method of comment 
submittal. Comments may be submitted to the following Internet address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c6b5aba5e8a1b6a3b4a586aaa9b5a7a8a1a3aaa3b5e8a7a0e8abafaa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6c5dbd598d1c6d3c4d5f6dad9c5d7d8d1d3dad3c598d7d098dbdfda">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments may also be sent by fax to 1-310-
363-6387.

DATES: The suspense date for comment submittal is 15 September 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: GPERC at 1-310-363-2883, GPS JPO 
System Engineering Division, or write to the address above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The civilian and military communities use 
the Global Positioning System, which employs a constellation of 24 
satellites to provide continuously transmitted signals to enable 
appropriately configured GPS user equipment to produce accurate 
position, navigation, and time information.

Pamela D. Fitzgerald,
Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 04-21365 Filed 9-22-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,600
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,213
<OTHER-SE>                                    (65,997)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                              IDENTIX INCORPORATED
                 STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Three Months Ended
                                                                    September 30,
                                                                1996              1995
                                                            -----------       -----------
<S>                                                         <C>               <C>
Net income                                                  $   160,000       $   127,000
                                                            ===========       ===========

Number of shares used in computing per share amounts:

     Weighted average common shares outstanding              24,322,000        22,813,000

     Common equivalent shares attributable to
       stock options and warrants                               800,000         1,358,000
                                                            -----------       -----------
     Total weighted average common and common
       equivalent shares outstanding                         25,122,000        24,171,000
                                                            ===========       ===========

Net income per share                                        $      0.01       $      0.01
                                                            ===========       ===========
</TABLE>
### §179. Repealed. Aug. 7, 1946, ch. 770, §1(59), 60 Stat. 871

Section, acts June 4, 1880, ch. 121, 21 Stat. 156; July 1, 1916, ch. 209, 39 Stat. 309, related to annual report of Superintendent to Congress.

Prior to this repeal, 1940 Reorg. Plan No. IV, §11(a), eff. June 30, 1940, 5 F.R. 2422, 54 Stat. 1236, set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, directed that the annual report required by this section be submitted through the Federal Security Administrator.
Exhibit
3.2




State
of West Virginia










Certificate





I,
Joe Manchin III, Secretary of State of the


State
of West Virginia, hereby certify that





PDC
2005-A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP


Control Number:71741





has filed
its application for "Certificate of Limited Partnership" in my office according
to the provisions of the West Virginia Code. I hereby declare the organization
to be registered as a limited partnership from its effective date of November
30, 2004 until a certificate of cancellation has been filed with Secretary of
State.





Therefore,
I hereby issue this





CERTIFICATE
OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP





Given
      under my hand and the
              Great
      Seal of the State of
              West
      Virginia on this day of
              November
      30, 2004
              
              /s/JoeManchinIII
              
              Secretary
      of State
#### § 802.411 Certification of record for judicial review.

The record of a case including the record of proceedings before the Board shall be transmitted to the appropriate court pursuant to the rules of such court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 727.28

 728.40

 729.47

 730.46

 731.43

 732.32

 733.18

 733.99

 734.75

 735.49

 736.19

 736.88

 732.34

 726.24

 724.46

 730.62

 726.72

 727.25

 732.15

 726.69

 722.49

 721.81

 724.80

 727.14

 729.10

 730.76

 732.24

 733.56

 734.76

 734.33

 732.74

 1,463

 1,509

 1,554

 1,595

 1,636

 1,675

 1,713

 1,749

 1,783

 1,817

 1,849

 1,880

 1,676

 1,422

 1,352

 1,602

 1,441

 1,462

 1,668

 1,440

 1,277

 1,252

 1,365

 1,458

 1,538

 1,608

 1,672

 1,730

 1,783

 1,764

 1,694

STORAGE

+48

+46

+45

+41

+41

+39

+38

+36

+34

+34

+32

+31

-204

-254

-70

+250

-161

+21

+206

-228

-163

-25

+113

+93

+80

+70

+64

+58

+53

-19

-70

CHANGE

24

23

23

21

21

20

19

18

17

17

16

16

7

-6

47

205

64

111

208

84

52

16

57

47

40

35

32

29

27

20

14

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 110

 122

 82

 79

 145

 100

 104

 199

 134

 29

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 30

 49

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2019 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2019

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +279 1,324 0 1,183

ACRE-FEET +279 2,626 0 2,346

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,346

 2,346

 1,415

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for P-B Watson & Taylor Ltd.-2
                    and is qualified in its entirety by
                    reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>

<CIK>                           0000737296
<NAME>                          P-B Watson & Taylor Ltd.-2
<MULTIPLIER>                    1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          1,098,872

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                370,361

<PP&E>                          2,018,521

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  3,487,754

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           837,904

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      2,649,850

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    3,487,754

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0<F1>

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0<F1>

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0<F1>

<EPS-BASIC>                   0<F1>

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
<FN>
<F1>
Registrant adopted the liquidation basis of accounting
on October 1, 1996, and, accordingly, does not reflect
operations subsequent to October 1, 1996. See Note A
to the financial statements for further details.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### John F. Devine, Administrator, Appellant, v. The Aurora, Elgin *&*Chicago Railway Company, Appellee.

Gen. No. 16,444.

1. Intebtjrbaw. *railroads*— care *required to avoid injuring trespassers.*As soon as a motorman of an interurban railroad becomes aware of the presence of a trespasser on tracks on a bridge it becomes bis duty to use reasonable care to avoid injury, and unless there is some evidence tending to show a failure of such duty it is proper to direct a verdict.

2. Interurban *railroads'*— -when *evidence shows due care to avoid injuring trespassers. A*motorman of an interurban train going forty-five miles an hour, when from 125 to 300 feet distant, saw a trespasser on her bands and knees between the rails on a bridge, and the trespasser remained in such position until struck. The motorman reversed bis motor, put on bis brake, and did everything in bis power to stop the train but was unable to do so until it bad passed over the trespasser. *Held,*a peremptory instruction for defendant was properly granted.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1910.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed August 12, 1912.

Benjamin C. Bachrach and Arthur C. Bachrach, for appellant.

Hopkins, Peppers & Hopkins, for appellee.

*133Mr. Justice Graves

delivered the opinion of the court.

Mrs. Martha "WAlff was run over and killed hy a train of two cars, owned and operated by appellee, while she was on the tracks of appellee on the bridge over the Desplaines river. Just how she came to be there is left to conjecture, but that she was a trespasser there is not questioned. On the trial the court, at the close of the plaintiff’s ease, instructed the jury to find the defendant not guilty. Appellant claims that was error.

As soon as the servants of appellee became aware of the presence of the deceased on the track, it became their duty to exercise all reasonable care to avoid injuring her. Unless there is some evidence in the record fairly tending to show the failure of those servants to perform that duty, the instruction was properly given. The evidence tends to show that the bridge over the Desplaines river is about 200 feet long; that when the motorman first saw the deceased she was on her hands and knees between the rails of the road; that she remained in about the same position until the train struck her; that when the motorman first saw her, the train was from 125 to 300 feet west of the bridge, and going at the rate of forty-five miles per hour; that as soon as he saw her, the motorman reversed his motor, put on his brake and did everything in his power to stop the train, but was unable to do so until the train had passed over the deceased. There is no evidence tending to show that he omitted to do anything he could have done to stop the train sooner, or that the killing of the deceased was the result of any misconduct or negligence on the part of the servants of appellee.

There is no error in giving the peremptory instruction. The judgment of the Superior Court is, therefore, affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1145 How the presumed value rule applies in a nonmedical for-profit institution.

If you live in a nonmedical for-profit institution, we consider the amount accepted by that institution as payment in full to be the current market value of whatever food or shelter the institution provides. If you are paying or are legally indebted for that amount, you are not receiving in-kind support and maintenance. We do not use the presumed value rule unless someone else pays for you.

[45 FR 65547, Oct. 3, 1980, as amended at 70 FR 6345, Feb. 7, 2005]
### §5412. Stabilization assistance for Poland

#### (a) Immediate emergency assistance

To the extent that the ongoing International Monetary Fund review of the Polish economy projects a probable balance of payments shortage for the fourth quarter of 1989, the United States Government, in carrying out paragraph (1) of section 5411(b) of this title—

(1) should work closely with the European Community and international financial institutions to determine the extent of emergency assistance required by Poland for the fourth quarter of 1989, and

(2) should consider extending a bridge loan to relieve immediate and urgent balance of payments requirements using the Exchange Stabilization Fund in accordance with paragraph (1)(A) of section 5411(b) of this title.

#### (b) Immediate, multilateral response to Poland's economic stabilization needs

In furtherance of section 5411(b)(1) of this title, the President, acting in coordination with the European Community, should seek to ensure that the industrialized democracies undertake an immediate, multilateral effort to respond to Poland's request for $1,000,000,000 to support its economic stabilization program.

#### (c) Additional authority to provide stabilization assistance

#### (1) Authority

In order to carry out paragraph (1) of section 5411(b) of this title, the President is authorized to furnish assistance for Poland, notwithstanding any other provision of law, to assist in the urgent stabilization of the Polish economy and ultimately to promote longer-term economic growth and stability, based on movement toward free market principles. Such assistance may be provided for balance of payments support (including commodity import programs), support for private sector development, or for other activities to further efforts to develop a free market-oriented economy in Poland.

#### (2) Authorization of appropriations

For purposes of providing the assistance authorized by this subsection, there are authorized to be appropriated $200,000,000 for fiscal year 1990 to carry out chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2346 and following; relating to the economic support fund), in addition to amounts otherwise available for such purposes.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title I, §102, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1303.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Chapter 4 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is classified to part IV (§2346 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 32 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.