alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.7

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Douglas K. Cooper, David J. Prystash, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of
them, with full power to act without the others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other
documents in connection with the Form 10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 12th day of
February, 2010.



/s/ Alexander M. WolfSignaturePrintName:

Alexander M. Wolf
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and the consolidated statement of operations and is
qualified in its entirety by referene to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,102,698
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,736,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                   76,969
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,007,636
<PP&E>                                         2,625,678
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,701,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,248,842
<BONDS>                                        3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       173,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,278,778
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,701,183
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,279,120
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,579,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,536,388
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,836,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,836,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,826,336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.17)
        


</TABLE>
§ 686.1060 How are center rankings established? ( a ) The Secretary calculates annual rankings of center performance based on the performance management system described in § 686.1000 as part of the annual performance assessment described in § 686.1000(c).
( b ) The Secretary will issue annual guidance that communicates the methodology for calculating the performance rankings for the year.
§ 702.603 Determining the payrate for compensating occupational disease claims which become manifest after retirement. ( a ) If the time of injury occurs within the first year after the employee has retired, the payrate for compensation purposes shall be one fifty-second part of the employee's average annual earnings during the fifty-two week period preceding retirement.
( b ) If the time of injury occurs more than one year after the employee has retired the payrate for compensation purposes shall be the national average weekly wage, determined according to section 6(b)(3) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 906(b)(3), at the time of injury.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25441-25451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10245]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of revised non-foreign overseas per diem rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 281. This 
bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates prescribed for U.S. 
Government employees for official travel in Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto 
Rico, the Northern

[[Page 25442]]

Mariana Islands and Possessions of the United States. AEA changes 
announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain in effect. Bulletin Number 281 
is being published in the Federal Register to assure that travelers are 
paid per diem at the most current rates.

DATES: Effective Date: May 1, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Sonia Malik, 571-372-1276.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Transportation 
Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental 
United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin 
Number 280. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by 
mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the 
Federal Register now constitute the only notification of revisions in 
per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of 
Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please 
contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows: The 
changes in Civilian Bulletin 281 are updated rates for Hawaii and the 
Midway Islands.

    Dated: April 24, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 25443]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.000


[[Page 25444]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.001


[[Page 25445]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.002


[[Page 25446]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.003


[[Page 25447]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.004


[[Page 25448]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.005


[[Page 25449]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.006


[[Page 25450]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.007


[[Page 25451]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30AP12.008

[FR Doc. 2012-10245 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
### Paleotectonic investigations of the Permian system in the United States

By: Edwin Dinwiddie McKeeSteven S. OrielHenry L. Berryhill Jr.Eleanor J. CrosbyDonald A. MyersGeorge H. DixonMarjorie E. MacLachlanMelville R. MudgeEdwin K. MaughanRichard Porter SheldonEarl R. CressmanThomas M. CheneyVincent E. McKelveyWalter E. HallgarthKeith B. Ketner

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp515

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 6**                            (pdf) 
- Table:  **Table 1**                            (pdf)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.971 General.

The work, without regard to legality, that you have done during any period in which you believe you are disabled may show that you are able to work at the substantial gainful activity level. If you are able to engage in substantial gainful activity, we will find that you are not disabled. (We explain the rules for persons who are statutorily blind in § 416.984.) Even if the work you have done was not substantial gainful activity, it may show that you are able to do more work than you actually did. We will consider all of the medical and vocational evidence in your file to decide whether or not you have the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity.

[45 FR 55621, Aug. 20, 1980, as amended at 65 FR 42788, July 11, 2000]
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                        ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-J4
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-J4


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March [  ], 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                      Dated: March [  ], 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
#### In the Matter of Harry A. Mackler, Petitioner, against Mary Donlon et al., Constituting the Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondents.

Determination annulled, with $50 costs and disbursements to the petitioner, on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to sustain the same. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to confirm the determination. Settle order on notice. ,
#### Richard K. MURRAY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 06-3100.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2006.

Richard K. Murray, pro se.

*940ORDER

A petition for review of an initial decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board having been docketed in this court, and it appearing that the petitioner has also sought review before the board, and it appearing that the initial decision of the board will not become a final decision, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and it hereby is, DISMISSED, without prejudice to the subsequent filing of a petition for review after the board has again acted in the case.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

February 4, 2011

0201

Order 

February 4, 2011

140889

TIMOTHY JONES and CHRYSTAL JONES,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 140889

COA: 285099 

Macomb CC: 2007-001010-NO

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 7, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that portion of the Court of Appeals 

decision reinstating one aspect of the plaintiffs’ premises liability claim and we 

REINSTATE the summary disposition ruling of the Macomb Circuit Court. The 

defendant premises owner did not have a duty to protect the injured plaintiff, an 

employee of an independent contractor hired to perform construction work on the 

owner’s premises, from the hazardous condition that contributed to the plaintiff’s injury, 

where the defendant delegated to the contractor the task of performing the construction 

work. Banaszak v Northwest Airlines, Inc, 485 Mich 1034 (2010); Young v Delcor 

Assoc, 477 Mich 931 (2006). Moreover, even if premises liability had applied, the 

injured plaintiff could not have recovered where he was aware of the hazard, and indeed 

had ordered its creation. Riddle v McLouth Steel Products Corp, 440 Mich 86 (1992). 

The Court of Appeals theory of liability based on the presence, location and design of the 

hinged metal floor hatch lacks legal and factual merit. The plaintiff, who ordered the 

hatch to be opened, was not injured by the presence, location and design of the hatch, but 

rather by falling through the hole that was created when the hatch was opened. An owner 

of property cannot be held liable under premises liability law for a design of the property 

that permits an invitee or person in control of the property to create a hazardous condition 

where none existed before.

MARILYN KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.

HATHAWAY, J., would deny leave to appeal.
Exhibit
      32.2


Certification
      of Chief Financial
      Officer


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31,
      2007 (the “Report”) of United States Oil Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Howard Mah,
      the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best
      of my
      knowledge, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.






/s/
              Howard
              MahName:
            Howard
              MahDate:
            March
              17,
              2008
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Prehistoric near-surface subsidence cracks in western Fresno 
County, California

#### Professional Paper 437-C

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp437C 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 0

 128

 94

 104

 102

 101

 101

 100

 98

 97

 97

 94

 87

 84

 80

 76

 76

 76

 76

 80

 82

 81

 79

 78

 81

 85

 84

 85

 0

 80

 81

 96

 26

 96

 97

 96

 94

 87

 84

 79

 81

 78

 76

 74

 74

 73

 73

 73

 78

 78

 76

 74

 74

 80

 81

 80

 0

 93

 85

 102

 100

 98

 98

 98

 96

 92

 87

 85

 84

 82

 78

 75

 75

 75

 75

 75

 80

 79

 77

 76

 77

 83

 83

 82

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2021

HIGH LOW MEAN

 0.0

 54.9

 54.3

 53.3

 57.7

 52.9

 52.9

 53.2

 54.6

 56.1

 55.0

 55.4

 56.0

 53.8

 53.3

 53.2

 53.0

 52.3

 53.4

 53.8

 54.3

 54.9

 55.8

 55.4

 55.0

 55.6

 55.9

 56.1

 0.0

 53.3

 51.5

 50.5

 49.4

 49.2

 49.2

 49.8

 51.9

 52.6

 53.2

 52.6

 53.3

 52.4

 52.1

 51.5

 50.8

 49.8

 51.2

 51.6

 51.4

 51.4

 52.5

 52.5

 51.4

 51.2

 52.2

 51.6

 0.0

 54.0

 52.9

 51.9

 51.3

 51.0

 51.0

 51.5

 53.2

 54.3

 54.0

 54.0

 54.4

 53.0

 52.7

 52.3

 51.9

 51.3

 52.3

 52.8

 52.9

 53.2

 54.1

 53.9

 53.2

 53.4

 54.0

 53.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 0.0

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.6

 10.4

 10.3

 10.3

 10.1

 10.1

 10.5

 10.6

 10.7

 10.8

 11.0

 10.9

 10.8

 10.6

 10.7

 10.6

 10.5

 10.6

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 0.0

 9.1

 7.9

 7.2

 9.4

 10.1

 10.1

 10.1

 9.8

 9.8

 9.5

 9.7

 8.7

 9.7

 10.5

 10.5

 10.6

 10.8

 10.7

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.9

 0.0

 9.5

 9.5

 9.1

 10.1

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.1

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 9.5

 10.2

 10.5

 10.6

 10.7

 10.9

 10.8

 10.6

 10.4

 10.5

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.0

 10.0

 10.2

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Space station systemstechnology study, final report.**
 
Volumes: 1. Executive summary. | 2. Trade study and technology selection, technicalreport
 
Volume 3 is notcurrently available.
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:171014 | NAS 1.26:171015| NAS 1.26:171016
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000940422
 
April 17, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 75

 71

 74

 74

 74

 87

 99

 79

 75

 74

 76

 76

 77

 78

 106

 106

 76

 81

 75

 76

 81

 79

 82

 77

 112

 110

 75

 76

 74

 77

 73

 63

 64

 67

 66

 66

 65

 74

 69

 64

 64

 66

 68

 68

 69

 70

 71

 68

 69

 67

 68

 68

 70

 67

 67

 70

 68

 67

 65

 67

 67

 67

 68

 67

 69

 69

 68

 71

 78

 72

 69

 68

 69

 70

 70

 72

 77

 78

 71

 72

 70

 70

 74

 74

 72

 69

 80

 76

 70

 70

 70

 72

 69

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 25, 2013

HIGH LOW MEAN

 78.4

 78.6

 77.6

 78.7

 77.7

 76.4

 76.6

 76.9

 77.5

 76.5

 77.0

 76.9

 77.6

 78.0

 77.2

 76.1

 75.9

 76.9

 77.7

 78.1

 79.1

 76.8

 75.0

 76.3

 77.7

 78.7

 79.1

 78.4

 76.8

 75.7

 76.6

 74.6

 74.8

 74.3

 74.4

 73.8

 72.2

 71.8

 72.2

 72.1

 72.8

 71.5

 71.3

 71.8

 72.5

 72.1

 71.4

 70.3

 71.0

 71.8

 72.8

 73.6

 73.5

 72.7

 70.6

 71.8

 73.1

 73.4

 73.6

 72.6

 71.4

 71.1

 76.7

 76.9

 76.2

 76.5

 75.9

 74.4

 74.2

 74.4

 74.8

 74.8

 74.2

 74.0

 74.6

 75.1

 74.7

 73.7

 73.1

 73.9

 74.6

 75.4

 76.2

 75.3

 73.9

 73.3

 74.6

 75.9

 76.2

 76.0

 74.7

 73.3

 73.7

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.9

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 8.2

 8.2

 8.3

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.4

 8.5

 8.4

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 8.2

 8.4

 8.3

 7.8

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.1

 8.3

 8.3

 8.3

 7.8

 7.7

 7.8

 7.8

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.5

 7.5

 7.7

 7.9

 7.8

 7.5

 7.4

 7.3

 7.5

 7.7

 7.9

 8.1

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.6

 8.4

 7.9

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 7.9

 7.7

 7.8

 8.0

 8.2

 8.1

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.8

 8.0

 8.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM