alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5715. Cultural and educational exchanges

It is the sense of the Congress that the following, which are based in part on the relevant provisions of the Joint Declaration, are and should continue after June 30, 1997, to be the policy of the United States with respect to cultural and educational exchanges with Hong Kong:

(1) The United States should seek to maintain and expand United States-Hong Kong relations and exchanges in culture, education, science, and academic research. The United States should encourage American participation in bilateral exchanges with Hong Kong, both official and unofficial.

(2) The United States should actively seek to further United States-Hong Kong cultural relations and promote bilateral exchanges, including the negotiating and concluding of appropriate agreements in these matters.

(3) Hong Kong should be accorded separate status as a full partner under the Fulbright Academic Exchange Program (apart from the United Kingdom before July 1, 1997, and apart from the People's Republic of China thereafter), with the continuation or establishment of a Fulbright Commission or functionally equivalent mechanism.

(4) The United States should actively encourage Hong Kong residents to visit the United States on nonimmigrant visas for such purposes as business, tourism, education, and scientific and academic research, in accordance with applicable United States and Hong Kong laws.

(5) Upon the request of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong, the Librarian of Congress, acting through the Congressional Research Service, should seek to expand educational and informational ties with the Council.

(Pub. L. 102–383, title I, §105, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1452.)
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications (CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in theevent that publications are no longer available from the original publishingagency site. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  One hundred eighty landings of UnitedStates Marines, 1800-1934

PDF(pt1),PDF(pt2),PDF(complete),EPUB,KINDLE(MOBI)

 
SuDoc:D 214.13:L 23
Item Number:0383 (online)
CGP system Number:001024988
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 967.55

 967.28

 966.94

 966.80

 966.74

 966.54

 966.42

 966.24

 966.07

 966.04

 966.05

 965.95

 965.84

 965.72

 965.66

 965.71

 965.56

 965.54

 965.45

 965.40

 965.46

 965.78

 966.09

 966.10

 966.26

 966.04

 966.15

 966.19

 967.04

 967.32

 2,181.2

 2,176.3

 2,170.1

 2,167.6

 2,166.5

 2,162.9

 2,160.7

 2,157.5

 2,154.4

 2,153.9

 2,154.0

 2,152.2

 2,150.3

 2,148.1

 2,147.0

 2,147.9

 2,145.2

 2,144.9

 2,143.2

 2,142.3

 2,143.4

 2,149.2

 2,154.8

 2,154.9

 2,157.8

 2,153.9

 2,155.8

 2,156.6

 2,171.9

 2,177.0

STORAGE

-9.8

-4.9

-6.2

-2.5

-1.1

-3.6

-2.2

-3.3

-3.1

-0.5

+0.2

-1.8

-2.0

-2.2

-1.1

+0.9

-2.7

-0.4

-1.6

-0.9

+1.1

+5.8

+5.6

+0.2

+2.9

-4.0

+2.0

+0.7

+15.4

+5.1

CHANGE

 1,516

 3,109

 1,982

 3,641

 3,904

 2,282

 2,950

 2,887

 2,975

 3,490

 3,916

 2,809

 2,786

 2,676

 3,272

 3,470

 2,548

 3,736

 3,017

 3,542

 4,456

 6,091

 6,887

 3,993

 5,384

 1,889

 4,684

 4,090

 9,013

 5,183

INFLOW

 6,418

 5,532

 5,038

 4,859

 4,430

 3,999

 3,991

 4,475

 4,472

 3,722

 3,751

 3,649

 3,714

 3,722

 3,773

 2,975

 3,871

 3,880

 3,812

 3,953

 3,897

 3,175

 4,062

 3,891

 3,898

 3,863

 3,660

 3,714

 1,251

 2,605

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 54

 53

 59

 59

 21

 106

 53

 53

 53

 42

 74

 69

 69

 42

 42

 42

 37

 37

 21

 42

 16

 16

 11

 11

 27

 32

 21

 11

 11

 11

C.F.S.

 .10

 .10

 .11

 .11

 .04

 .20

 .10

 .10

 .10

 .08

 .14

 .13

 .13

 .08

 .08

 .08

 .07

 .07

 .04

 .08

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .06

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .05

 4.03

 1.62

 .00

 .00

 .31

 1.33

 2.02

 1.40

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 12, 2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -14.0 112,178 118,052 0 0 1,195 2.25 10.81

ACRE-FEET -14,000 222,505 234,156 0 0 2,370

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 234,156

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 234,156

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 10.81

JULY 1, 2018 13.39

 2,191.0

Table 3

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 13.13
### §7431. Nondelegation

The authorities vested in the President by sections 7422 and 7430(a) of this title may not be delegated by the President pursuant to section 301 of title 3 or any other provision of law. The authority vested in the President by section 7424(c)(3) of this title may not be delegated by the President pursuant to section 301 of title 3 or any other provision of law to any official other than the Secretary of Defense, and if so delegated may not be subdelegated.

(Pub. L. 107–206, title II, §2012, Aug. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 907.)
#### § 901.48 Proposed findings and conclusions.

Except in cases where the respondent has failed to answer the complaint or where a party has failed to appear at the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge, before making his/her decision, shall give the parties a reasonable opportunity to submit proposed findings and conclusions and supporting reasons therefor.
#### Lena R. McCauley*
      *v.*The People *ex rel.*Louis C. Huck.

Special *assessments—notice of application for judgment need not include taxes.*Notice of an application for judgment against lands for unpaid special assessments, separate and distinct from the notice of application for judgment for *124unpaid taxes, although judgment is asked as to both at the same time, is not invalid. The application may be made for judgment for both special assessments and taxes together, but the law does not make this imperative.

Appeals from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Martin R. M. Wallace, Judge, presiding.

These several cases arise under an application by Louis C. Huck, collector of Cook county, for judgment against certain lands and lots, for unpaid special assessments and taxes. The county court overruled the objections made, and rendered judgment against the lands.

Mr. Edward Roby, for the appellants.

Mr. Francis Adams, Mr. Elliott Anthony, and Mr. W. H. Holden, for the appellee.

The cases of *Race*v. *The People ex rel. Huck,*and *Walker*v. *The Same,*are also considered in this opinion.

Per Curiam :

But one and the same question is presented, in each of these cases, by the appellant. These are appeals from the judgment of the county court, against certain lands, for certain special assessments. At the same term, the same collector made his application for judgment against delinquent lands for taxes; but the notice of the application for judgment for taxes, and the notice for the application for judgment for unpaid special assessments, were not one single notice, embracing both matters in one notice, but the notice under which each of these judgments was rendered was a notice separate from the general notice for judgment for unpaid taxes. Appellant, in each of these cases, insists that this is unlawful, and his counsel has made a very elaborate argument to support the proposition that, by law, judgment for unpaid special assessments can only be rendered where the application for judgment rests upon a notice included in the notice given of the application for judgment for unpaid taxes, and constituting a part of such notice. He insists that such collector can not publish several and separate notices of the respective applications.

*125This question was before this court in the case of *The People*v. *Sherman,*83 Ill. 168, and it was there expressly declared that notice in such case can not be held invalid upon the mere ground that it is a notice and application of the county collector, separate and distinct from his application for judgment for State and county taxes. It is there said: “ It may be it would be better, and, no doubt, less expensive, that applications for judgments against delinquent lands for special assessments, and for State and county taxes, should be by one notice, but we do not understand any provision of law has made it imperative.”

Seeing no reason to change our views, these judgments must be affirmed.

*Judgments affirmed.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 699.71

 699.78

 699.78

 700.30

 700.94

 701.01

 700.74

 699.75

 700.10

 700.17

 699.82

 699.80

 699.70

 700.53

 701.26

 701.78

 702.27

 703.08

 703.52

 704.19

 704.84

 705.46

 705.93

 706.22

 706.52

 706.83

 707.13

 707.39

 707.54

 707.68

 595

 597

 597

 609

 624

 625

 619

 596

 604

 606

 598

 597

 595

 614

 631

 644

 655

 675

 686

 703

 720

 736

 748

 756

 764

 772

 781

 788

 792

 796

STORAGE

+5

+2

+0

+12

+15

+1

-6

-23

+8

+2

-8

-1

-2

+19

+17

+13

+11

+20

+11

+17

+17

+16

+12

+8

+8

+8

+9

+7

+4

+4

CHANGE

264

5

4

10

12

5

1

-8

8

5

0

3

3

13

11

9

8

12

14

10

9

8

6

4

4

4

5

4

2

2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 261

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 8

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2012

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +206 437 0 329

ACRE-FEET +206 867 0 653

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 653

 653

 590

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
FILED

November 9, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

SI J. WILLIAMS, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Davidson Circuit

) No. 95-D-3793

VS. )

) Appeal No.

MARY C. WILLIAMS, ) 01A01-9709-CV-00522

)

Defendant/Appellant. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the results of this opinion. However, I am filing this separate

opinion to clarify my understanding of the significance of the portion of the decision

dealing with the need of the parties’ daughter for continuing support past her

eighteenth birthday. 

Mr. Williams’s cruel treatment of his daughter has left deep emotional scars.

The evidence introduced at trial, including the evidence of repeated hospitalizations

and continuing outpatient treatment, leaves little room for doubt that the girl’s

problems are real and genuine. However, the trial court apparently declined to

require Mr. Williams to support his daughter after her eighteenth birthday because it

gave little weight to the opinion offered by the psychological counselor who had been

treating the girl for four years.

The counselor’s opinion about the girl’s current socialization and her

continuing need for therapy is extremely equivocal, and for that reason, I agree that

Ms. Williams did not carry her burden of proving that Mr. Williams should be

required to continue to support his daughter. However, the trial court’s explanation

of its decision could also be interpreted to mean that the girl’s condition is not the sort

of condition that warrants further therapy and that the girl’s counselor is not qualified
-2-

to render an opinion on the issue because he is a psychologist with a master’s degree

rather than an psychiatrist with a medical degree. Our opinion should not be

construed as agreeing with either of these interpretations. Based on the facts in the

record, the treating psychologist was qualified under Tenn. R. Evid. 702 to render an

opinion concerning his patient’s condition and should have been permitted under

Tenn. R. Evid. 703 to use her medical records as a basis for his opinion.

_________________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       15
房屋租赁合同


 


LEASE
AGREEMENT (English Translation)


 


出租方:
衡阳市雁峰区岳屏敬老院 (夕阳红公寓)
(以下简称甲方)


 


Lesser:
Golden Sunset Community, Yanfeng District, Hengyang, Hunan (hereinafter referred to as Party A)


 


承租方:
湖南孝德天下养老产业管理有限公司
(以下简称乙方)


 


Lessee:
Hunan Xiao De Tian Xia Senior Care Industry Management Co. Ltd (hereinafter referred to as Party B)


 


	1、	甲方自愿将衡阳市雁峰区岳屏乡文昌村王家组夕阳红办公楼3楼2间、2楼4间共6间办公用房(包括但不限于办公用房内原有的办公家俱、电脑、打印机、复印机、空调、风扇以及电信宽带)租赁给乙方, 特订此合同。



 


Party
A agrees to lease a total of 6 office rooms (two offices located at the third floor and four offices located at the second floor),
including but not limited to the existing office furniture, computers, printers, copiers, air conditioners, electronic fans and
telecom broadband to Party B.


 


	2、	房屋面积约为
    100 M2, 年租金为12000 元,分月付款, 每月付租金1000
    元。房屋押金10000 元, 租期自2017年5 月1日至2022年4月30日。


 


The
area of the premises is approximately 100 square meters; the annual rent is 12,000 yuan, payable monthly at 1000 yuan. The deposit
is 10,000 yuan, and the lease term is from May 1, 2017 to April 30, 2022.


 


	3、	租赁期间因水电无法单独计费, 双方协商每月固定收取水费50元, 电费6月、7月、8月、12月和1月用电高峰期每月1000元, 其他各月每月500元, 由乙方交纳给甲方。


 


During
the lease term, because water and electricity may not be charged separately, the parties agree that Party B shall pay Party A
water fee of 50 yuan each month. Party B shall also pay Party A 500 yuan each month for electricity, except that for each of June,
July, August, December and January, Party B shall pay 1,000 yuan to Party B.


 




    	 	 	 



    	 	 	 



    

 


	4、	租赁期间, 若甲方要收回房屋, 必须提前一个月书面通知乙方。同时退还房屋押金; 若乙方需要退租, 也必须提前一个月书面通知甲方。


 


During
the lease term, if Party A decides to terminate the lease, it shall give a one-month written notice to Party B as well as refund
the deposit. If Party B decides to terminate the lease, is shall give a one-month written notice to Party A.


 


	5、	租赁期间, 乙方未经甲方同意, 不得将房屋转租给第三方。租赁期满或解除合同时, 乙方需结清费用后退还房屋给甲方; 如需续租须提前一个月与甲方协商, 若逾期不还又未续租, 甲方有权收回房屋。


 


During
the lease term, Party B shall not sublease the premises to a third party without Party A’s consent. Upon expiration of the
lease or termination of the contract, Party B shall settle the fees and return the premises to Party A. If any extension of lease
term is required, Party B shall negotiate with Party B one month in advance. Party A shall have the right to repossess the premises
if the lease is not extended.


 


	6、	本合同经签字后即时生效, 一式二份, 甲乙双方各执一份, 之前租赁合同如与本合同有冲突, 以本合同为准, 如有未尽事宜, 可经双方协商作出补充规定, 均具同等法律效力。


 


This
agreement shall come into effect immediately after being signed by both parties in duplicate, with each party holding one copy.
In case of any conflict between any prior contract and this contract, this contract shall prevail. Parties hereto may revise or
supplement through negotiation matters not mentioned herein, which amendment or supplement shall have the equal binding force.


 


Party
A: /s/ Xinhui Li (Contract Stamp of Party A)


 


Party
B: /s/ Ling Zhou (Contract Stamp of Party B)
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge, that:  1.     The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 (the "Report") of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ T. Scott Conley T. Scott Conley, Chief Executive Officer  Date: December 19, 2006   /s/ India Creery India Creery, Interim Chief Financial Officer  Date: December 19, 2006   {A0036420.DOC}
§ 1.5 Signature to constitute certificate. When an individual who appears in a representative capacity signs a paper in practice before the Department, his signature shall constitute his certificate: ( a ) That under the provisions of this part and the law, he is authorized and qualified to represent the particular party in the matter;
( b ) That, if he is the partner of a present or former officer or employee, including a special Government employee, the matter in respect of which he intends to practice is not a matter in which such officer or employee of the Government or special Government employee participates or has participated personally and substantially as a Government employee through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation or otherwise and that the matter is not the subject of such partner's official Government responsibility;
( c ) That, if he is a former officer or employee, including a special Government employee, the matter in respect of which he intends to practice is not a matter in which he participated personally and substantially as a Government employee through decision, approval, disapproval, recommendation, the rendering of advice, investigation, or otherwise, while so employed and, if a period of one year has not passed since the termination of his employment with the Government, that the matter was not under his official responsibility as an officer or employee of the Government; and
( d ) That he has read the paper; that to the best of his knowledge, information, and belief there is good ground to support its contents; that it contains no scandalous or indecent matter; and that it is not interposed for delay.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       [ARTHUR ANDERSEN L.L.P. LETTERHEAD]



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

       As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
registration statement in connection with the Directors Stock Option Plan.




Arthur Andersen LLP
Detroit, Michigan
December 17, 1999
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
KIERON MATTHEW WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr - 00596

- GLR

- 1 )

Submitted : February 8, 2024 Decided: April 8, 2024

Before GREGORY and AGEE , Circuit Judge s , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Kieron Matthew Williams , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7157 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/08/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Kieron Matthew Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). * Upon review of the record, we
conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Williams’ motion.
See United States v. Malone , 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the court’s order. United States v. Williams , No. 1:14

- cr - 00596

- GLR

- 1 (D. Md. Sept. 13, 2022). W e deny Williams’ motions for summary disposition.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

* This court vacated the district court’s prior order denying Williams’ motion for compassionate release and remanded for further proceedings to ensure that the court’s explanation of its decision “‘allow[ed] for meaningful appellate review’ in light of the particular circumstances of the case.” United States v. Williams , No. 21

- 7124, 2022 WL 3543326, at *1 (4th Cir. Aug. 18, 2022) (quoting United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 18 8 (4th Cir. 2021)). USCA4 Appeal: 22-7157 Doc: 9 Filed: 04/08/2024 Pg: 2 of 2