alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SUBCHAPTER L—TILLAMOOK AND NEHALEM BANDS OF THE TILLAMOOK INDIANS: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACKROCK KELSO CAPITAL CORPORATION



|                       |  |             
|---------------------- |  | ------------
|Name                   |  | Jurisdiction
|BKC ARS Blocker, Inc.  |  | Delaware    
|BKC ASW Blocker, Inc.  |  | Delaware    
|BKC CSP Blocker, Inc.  |  | Delaware    
|BKC DVSH Blocker, Inc. |  | Delaware    
|BKC MTCH Blocker, Inc. |  | Delaware    

In addition, we may be deemed to
control certain portfolio companies identified as Controlled Investments in footnote (g) to the Schedule of Investments at December 31, 2010 included in the Financial Statements portion of BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 708.48

 708.65

 708.86

 709.06

 709.22

 709.48

 709.64

 709.77

 710.02

 710.15

 710.04

 709.66

 709.25

 708.92

 708.54

 708.13

 707.72

 707.26

 707.16

 707.37

 707.56

 707.60

 707.60

 707.60

 708.04

 707.56

 707.06

 706.58

 707.00

 709.54

 710.15

 818

 823

 829

 835

 839

 846

 851

 855

 862

 866

 862

 851

 840

 831

 820

 809

 797

 784

 781

 787

 793

 794

 794

 794

 806

 793

 779

 766

 777

 848

 866

STORAGE

+7

+5

+6

+6

+4

+7

+5

+4

+7

+4

-4

-11

-11

-9

-11

-11

-12

-13

-3

+6

+6

+1

+0

+0

+12

-13

-14

-13

+11

+71

+18

CHANGE

4

3

3

3

2

4

3

2

4

2

1

-1

-1

0

-1

-1

-1

-2

1

3

3

1

0

0

8

-2

-2

-2

6

36

9

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 5

 5

 5

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 16, 2001

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +55 85 0 58

ACRE-FEET +55 169 0 115

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 115

 115

 811

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.144 Electronic job registry. ( a ) *Location of and placement in the electronic job registry.* Upon acceptance of the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* under § 655.143, the CO will promptly place for public examination a copy of the job order on an electronic job registry maintained by the Department, including any required modifications approved by the CO, as specified in § 655.142.
( b ) *Length of posting on electronic job registry.* Unless otherwise provided, the Department will keep the job order posted on the electronic job registry in active status until the end of the recruitment period, as set forth in § 655.135(d).
### §286e–8. Treatment of creditors in debt rescheduling

The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States executive director to seek to assure that no decision by the International Monetary Fund undermines or departs from United States policy regarding the comparability of treatment of public and private creditors in cases of debt rescheduling where official United States credits are involved.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §29, as added Pub. L. 95–435, §3, Oct. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 1052; amended Pub. L. 96–389, §5, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1554.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–389 struck out "on the use of the facility" after "Monetary Fund".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1980 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 96–389 effective Oct. 7, 1980, see section 12 of Pub. L. 96–389, set out as an Effective Date note under section 286s of this title.
§ 683.640 What procedures apply to the appeals of non-designation of local areas? ( a ) A unit of general local government (including a combination of such units) or grant recipient whose appeal of the denial of a request for initial or subsequent designation as a local area to the State WDB has not resulted in such designation, may appeal the State WDB's denial to the Secretary.
( b ) Appeals made under paragraph (a) of this section must be filed no later than 30 days after receipt of written notification of the denial from the State WDB, and must be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the State WDB.
( c ) The appellant must establish that it was not accorded procedural rights under the appeal process set forth in the State Plan, or establish that it meets the requirements for designation in WIOA sec. 106(b)(2) or 106(b)(3) and § 679.250 of this chapter.
( d ) If the Secretary determines that the appellant has met its burden of establishing that it was not accorded procedural rights under the appeal process set forth in the State Plan, or that it meets the requirements for designation in WIOA sec. 106(b)(2) or 106(b)(3) and § 679.250 of this chapter, the Secretary may require that the area be designated as a local area. In making this determination, the Secretary may consider any comments submitted by the State WDB in response to the appeal made under paragraph (a) of this section.
( e ) The Secretary must issue a written decision to the Governor and the appellant.
Exhibit 24.7

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and of
NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Jason W. Bixby, Douglas K. Cooper, and Mark A. Suwyn, and each of them, with full power to act without the others, as
my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in connection with the Form 10-K,
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue of this Power of
Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 17th day of March, 2008.



/s/ Michael S. WilliamsSignature


PrintName:

Michael S. Williams
§ 725.207 Determination of dependency; divorced spouse. For the purpose of augmenting benefits, an individual who is the miner's divorced spouse (§ 725.206) will be determined to be dependent upon the miner if: ( a ) The individual is receiving at least one-half of his or her support from the miner (see § 725.233(g)); or
( b ) The individual is receiving substantial contributions from the miner pursuant to a written agreement (see § 725.233(c) and (f)); or
( c ) A court order requires the miner to furnish substantial contributions to the individual's support (see § 725.233(c) and (e)).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 807.45

 807.50

 807.50

 807.51

 807.51

 807.52

 807.49

 807.47

 807.46

 807.45

 807.43

 807.41

 807.35

 807.34

 807.31

 807.28

 807.32

 807.33

 807.33

 807.33

 807.31

 807.30

 807.30

 807.30

 807.30

 807.31

 807.29

 807.29

 807.30

 807.30

 17.07

 17.10

 17.10

 17.11

 17.11

 17.11

 17.09

 17.08

 17.07

 17.07

 17.05

 17.04

 17.00

 16.99

 16.97

 16.95

 16.98

 16.98

 16.98

 16.98

 16.97

 16.96

 16.96

 16.96

 16.96

 16.97

 16.96

 16.96

 16.96

 16.96

STORAGE

-0.07

+0.04

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

+0.01

-0.02

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.04

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

+0.03

+0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

+0.00

+0.01

-0.01

+0.00

+0.01

+0.00

CHANGE

4

54

36

40

37

41

25

30

33

32

30

30

15

31

26

24

48

39

35

36

30

31

36

36

36

41

29

36

39

33

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 33

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

OUTLET

 6

 6

 6

 6

 7

 7

 6

 7

 7

 6

 7

 7

 6

 5

 6

 5

 4

 5

 5

 6

 7

 5

 6

 6

 6

 7

 6

 6

 5

 3

C.F.S.

 .25

 .27

 .29

 .29

 .32

 .32

 .28

 .33

 .32

 .29

 .30

 .33

 .25

 .23

 .25

 .23

 .20

 .23

 .22

 .26

 .30

 .24

 .25

 .26

 .29

 .30

 .27

 .26

 .24

 .14

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

SEPTEMBER 2018 RUN DATE: 10/04/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.14 993 903 0 177 8.01 .00

ACRE-FEET -140 1,970 1,791 0 351

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,791

 1,791

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2018 .00

 17.14

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 9.71
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel HERRERA-BARAJAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40387.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Paul G. Hajjar, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender representing Manuel Herrera-Barajas has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of Herrera-Barajas’s response, counsel’s brief, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### [§215. Repealed. Pub. L. 112–141, div. A, title I, §1114(b)(2)(A), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 468]

Section, added Pub. L. 109–59, title I, §1118(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1179, related to territorial highway program.

A prior section 215, added Pub. L. 91–605, title I, §112(a), Dec. 31, 1970, 84 Stat. 1720; amended Pub. L. 95–599, title I, §129(f), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2708; Pub. L. 96–106, §9, Nov. 9, 1979, 93 Stat. 798; Pub. L. 100–17, title I, §133(b)(16), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 172, related to territorial highway program, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 109–59, title I, §1118(a), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1179.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 2012, see section 3(a) of Pub. L. 112–141, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2012 Amendment note under section 101 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.46 Additional employer-conducted recruitment. ( a ) *Requirement to conduct additional recruitment.* The employer may be instructed by the CO to conduct additional reasonable recruitment. Such recruitment may be required at the discretion of the CO where the CO has determined that there is a likelihood that U.S. workers who are qualified and will be available for the work, including but not limited to where the job opportunity is located in an Area of Substantial Unemployment.
( b ) *Nature of the additional employer-conducted recruitment.* The CO will describe the precise number and nature of the additional recruitment efforts. Additional recruitment may include, but is not limited to, posting on the employer's Web site or another Web site, contact with additional community-based organizations, additional contact with State One-Stop Career Centers, and other print advertising, such as using a professional, trade or ethnic publication where such a publication is appropriate for the occupation and the workers likely to apply for the job opportunity. When assessing the appropriateness of a particular recruitment method, the CO will consider the cost of the additional recruitment and the likelihood that the additional recruitment method(s) will identify qualified and available U.S. workers.
( c ) *Proof of the additional employer-conducted recruitment.* The CO will specify the documentation or other supporting evidence that must be maintained by the employer as proof that the additional recruitment requirements were met. Documentation must be maintained as required in § 655.56.
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael Gilligan, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of DB Commodity Index
Tracking Master Fund (the Master Fund), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Master Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Master Fund.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                            
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Dated: June 18, 2010 |  | /s/ Michael Gilligan       
|                     |  | Michael Gilligan           
|                     |  | Principal Financial Officer
### SUBCHAPTER XII—TORRES-MARTINEZ DESERT CAHUILLA INDIANS CLAIMS SETTLEMENT
#### § 10010.50 Implementing the decision.

The terms “monitoring” and “conditions” in 40 CFR 1505.3 of the CEQ regulations will be interpreted as being relevant to factors affecting the quality of the human environment.
#### Ewan Justice, Appellant, *v.*Julia T. Justice, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, entered in the New York county clerk’s office on the 2d day of April, 1914, denying a motion for leave to serve an amended complaint.

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff, having been denied the right to frame issues because his complaint was not definite enough and was too general, should now be allowed to make his complaint more definite so that he may comply with the rule laid down by the judge at Special Term and have issues framed. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed and the motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, and motion granted.
#### § 684.950 Does the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act provide any additional assistance to unique populations in Alaska and Hawaii?

Yes. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary is authorized to award grants, on a competitive basis, to entities with demonstrated experience and expertise in developing and implementing programs for the unique populations who reside in Alaska or Hawaii, including public and private nonprofit organizations, tribal organizations, American Indian tribal colleges or universities, institutions of higher education, or consortia of such organizations or institutions, to improve job training and workforce investment activities for such unique populations.
### §968. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §578, as added Sept. 8, 1960, Pub. L. 86–723, §16, 74 Stat. 834, related to foreign language knowledge as condition for assignment.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**                     CERTIFICATION      OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO**

**                     18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**                             AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**                  SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|                                             | **China              YouTV              Corporation** |                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             |                                                  |                                                     |   |
| Date:                Oct 15,                2007 | By:                                                   | /s/ James              Wei                          |   |
|                                             |                                                  | Name:              James Wei                             |   |
|                                             |                                                  | Title:              Chief Executive              Officer |   |
|                                             |                                                  |                                                     |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted), James P. Wilson, Chief Executive Officer of JK Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Quarterly
Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of March 31,
2009.


/s/ James P. Wilson

James P. Wilson
Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
### §4711. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §139(13), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 398

Section, Pub. L. 99–93, title VI, §611, Aug. 16, 1985, 99 Stat. 443, required annual report to Congress on activities and expenditures pursuant to this chapter.
### §6324. Definitions

As used in this subchapter—

(1) the term "highly enriched uranium" means uranium enriched to 20 percent or more in the isotope U–235;

(2) the term "IAEA" means the International Atomic Energy Agency;

(3) the term "near real time material accountancy" means a method of accounting for the location, quantity, and disposition of special fissionable material at facilities that store or process such material, in which verification of peaceful use is continuously achieved by means of frequent physical inventories and the use of in-process instrumentation;

(4) the term "special fissionable material" has the meaning given that term by Article XX(1) of the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency, done at the Headquarters of the United Nations on October 26, 1956;

(5) the term "the Treaty" means the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, signed at Washington, London, and Moscow on July 1, 1968; and

(6) the terms "IAEA safeguards", "non-nuclear-weapon state", "nuclear explosive device", and "special nuclear material" have the meanings given those terms in section 6305 of this title.

(Pub. L. 103–236, title VIII, §844, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 524.)