alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 725.233 Support and contributions. ( a ) *Support* defined. The term “support” includes food, shelter, clothing, ordinary medical expenses, and other ordinary and customary items for the maintenance of the person supported.
( b ) *Contributions* defined. The term “contributions” refers to contributions actually provided by the contributor from such individual's property, or the use thereof, or by the use of such individual's own credit.
( c ) *Regular contributions* and *substantial contributions* defined. The terms “regular contributions” and “substantial contributions” mean contributions that are customary and sufficient to constitute a material factor in the cost of the individual's support.
( d ) *Contributions and community property.* When a spouse receives and uses for his or her support income from services or property, and such income, under applicable State law, is the community property of the wife and her husband, no part of such income is a “contribution” by one spouse to the other's support regardless of the legal interest of the donor. However, when a spouse receives and uses for support, income from the services and the property of the other spouse and, under applicable State law, such income is community property, all of such income is considered to be a contribution by the donor to the spouse's support.
( e ) *Court order for support* defined. References to a support order in this subpart means any court order, judgment, or decree of a court of competent jurisdiction which requires regular contributions that are a material factor in the cost of the individual's support and which is in effect at the applicable time. If such contributions are required by a court order, this condition is met whether or not the contributions were actually made.
( f ) *Written agreement* defined. The term “written agreement” in the phrase “substantial contributions pursuant to a written agreement”, as used in this subpart means an agreement signed by the miner providing for substantial contributions by the miner for the individual's support. It must be in effect at the applicable time but it need not be legally enforceable.
( g ) *One-half support* defined. The term “one-half support” means that the miner made regular contributions, in cash or in kind, to the support of a divorced spouse at the specified time or for the specified period, and that the amount of such contributions equalled or exceeded one-half the total cost of such individual's support at such time or during such period.
( h ) *Totally dependent for support* defined. The term “totally dependent for support” as used in § 725.225(b) means that the miner made regular contributions to the support of the miner's parents, brother, or sister, as the case may be, and that the amount of such contributions at least equalled the total cost of such individual's support.
#### § 901.47 Transcript.

In cases where the hearing is stenographically reported by a Government contract reporter, copies of the transcript may be obtained from the reporter at rates not to exceed the maximum rates fixed by contract between the Government and the reporter. Where the hearing is stenographically reported by a regular employee of the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Labor, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, or the Joint Board, a copy thereof will be supplied to the respondent either without charge or upon the payment of a reasonable fee. Copies of exhibits introduced at the hearing or at the taking of depositions will be supplied to parties upon the payment of a reasonable fee (31 U.S.C. 9701).

[43 FR 39757, Sept. 7, 1978, as amended at 76 FR 17776, Mar. 31, 2011]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 836.78

 836.72

 836.66

 836.60

 836.52

 836.44

 836.35

 836.27

 836.19

 836.14

 836.05

 835.96

 835.87

 835.78

 835.69

 835.60

 835.52

 835.44

 835.31

 835.21

 835.11

 834.98

 834.87

 834.75

 834.64

 834.58

 834.48

 834.32

 834.20

 833.97

 45.07

 45.00

 44.92

 44.85

 44.75

 44.66

 44.55

 44.45

 44.35

 44.29

 44.18

 44.07

 43.96

 43.86

 43.75

 43.64

 43.54

 43.45

 43.29

 43.17

 43.05

 42.90

 42.77

 42.63

 42.50

 42.43

 42.31

 42.12

 41.98

 41.71

STORAGE

-0.07

-0.07

-0.07

-0.07

-0.10

-0.10

-0.11

-0.10

-0.10

-0.06

-0.11

-0.11

-0.11

-0.11

-0.11

-0.11

-0.10

-0.10

-0.16

-0.12

-0.12

-0.16

-0.13

-0.14

-0.13

-0.07

-0.12

-0.19

-0.14

-0.27

CHANGE

202

203

202

201

188

190

181

188

189

204

183

185

186

188

188

188

191

194

161

181

177

161

173

166

172

167

178

169

190

121

INFLOW

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

SPILL

 210

 210

 210

 210

 210

 210

 210

 210

 210

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 209

 208

 208

 208

 208

 207

 171

 205

 231

 230

 228

OUTLET

 14

 14

 14

 13

 12

 14

 11

 12

 13

 11

 14

 16

 16

 18

 18

 18

 15

 18

 16

 17

 14

 17

 15

 15

 15

 17

 17

 18

 16

 15

C.F.S.

 .35

 .37

 .37

 .34

 .30

 .36

 .29

 .30

 .35

 .29

 .36

 .42

 .41

 .46

 .46

 .48

 .39

 .48

 .43

 .46

 .37

 .44

 .39

 .40

 .40

 .45

 .44

 .49

 .43

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JUNE 2007 RUN DATE: 07/02/2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -3.46 5,467 6,293 450 453 11.89 .00

ACRE-FEET -3,460 10,844 12,482 893 899

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 893

OUTLET

TOTAL

 12,482

 13,375

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2006 10.64

 45.14

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00590-CV

In re Candyce Zook

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial 

court’s temporary orders finding no prima facie showing of an informal marriage in Relator’s 

suit for divorce. To be entitled to a writ of mandamus in Texas, a relator must establish that 

the ruling of the trial court constitutes a clear abuse of discretion. In re Frank Kent Motor Co., 

361 S.W.3d 628, 630 (Tex. 2012). When a marriage is put in issue, the burden is on the party 

seeking support under an informal-marriage theory to establish at least a prima facie case of 

marriage. Ex parte Threet, 333 S.W.2d 361, 364 (1960). In Texas, an informal marriage may 

be proved by evidence establishing three elements: (1) an agreement to be married; (2) living 

together as spouses; and (3) representing to others that the couple are married. Tex. Fam. Code 

§ 2.401(a)(2). Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we find the record 

evidence in conflict as to the first of these three elements, and inconclusive as to the third. 

Accordingly, the trial court was within its discretion to find no prima facie showing of an 

informal marriage, and we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
2

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

Filed: October 7, 2022
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCarbon Dioxide Adsorption on a 5A Zeolite Designed for CO2 Removal in Spacecraft CabinsCarbon dioxide adsorption data were obtained for a 5A zeolite manufactured by AlliedSignal Inc. (Des Plaines, Illinois). The material is planned for use in the Carbon Dioxide Removal Assembly (CDRA) for U.S. elements of the International Space Station. The family of adsorption isotherms covers a temperature range of O to 250 C, and a pressure range of 0.001 to 800 torr. Coefficients of the Toth equation are fit to the data. Isosteric heats of adsorption are derived from the equilibrium loading data.Document ID19980237902Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMulloth, Lila M.*(Lockheed Martin Engineering and Sciences Co. Moffett Field, CA United States)*Finn, John E.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1998Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208752NAS 1.15:208752Rept-A9800125Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980237902.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §285n. Authorization of appropriations to provide United States Special Resources

For the purpose of providing United States Special Resources to the Bank there is hereby authorized to be appropriated $100,000,000, all of which shall remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §17, as added Pub. L. 92–245, §1, Mar. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 58; amended Pub. L. 93–189, §28, Dec. 17, 1973, 87 Stat. 732.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1973—Pub. L. 93–189 substituted "$100,000,000" for "$60,000,000 for the fiscal year 1972 and $40,000,000 for the fiscal year 1973".
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Addison Warren PAYNE, III, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-30418.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

William P. Gibbens, William J. Quinlan, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Roma A. Kent, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Robin Elise Schulberg, Federal Public Defender’s Office Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans, LA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*643PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Addison Warren Payne, III, challenges his sentence for bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d) and for brandishing a firearm under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). Citing *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), Payne asserts that the district court erred by increasing his sentence based upon facts that were neither proven to a jury nor admitted by Payne. Because he did not raise a Sixth Amendment objection below, we review this issue for plain error. *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005). Payne must demonstrate (1) an error, (2) that is plain, and (3) that affects his substantial rights. *Id.*If these conditions are satisfied, we may exercise our discretion to correct the error *if*it “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.” *Id.*

To the extent that Payne argues that any error should be considered presumptively prejudicial, this argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent. *United States v. Malveaux,*411 F.3d 558, 561 n. 9 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 194, 163 L.Ed.2d 209 (2005).

Payne correctly asserts that the district court increased his sentence for both the bank robbery and firearm convictions based upon factual findings made by the judge. Because the judge sentenced Payne under the belief that the Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory, we find that the court committed error that was plain. *See Mares,*402 F.3d at 520-21. However, Payne cannot demonstrate that the error affected his substantial rights under this court’s precedent. *See id.*

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
§ 725.218 Conditions of entitlement; child. ( a ) An individual is entitled to benefits where he or she meets the required standards of relationship and dependency under this subpart (see § 725.220 and § 725.221) and is the child of a deceased miner who: ( 1 ) Is determined to have died due to pneumoconiosis; or
( 2 ) Filed a claim for benefits on or after January 1, 1982, which results or resulted in a final award of benefits, and the surviving child filed a claim for benefits after January 1, 2005 which was pending on or after March 23, 2010.
( b ) A child is not entitled to benefits for any month for which a miner, or the surviving spouse or surviving divorced spouse of a miner, establishes entitlement to benefits.
[65 FR 80054, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 59117, Sept. 25, 2013]
#### The People *ex rel.*Louis C. Huck *v.*John S. Quick *et al.*

*Taxes—who may object to judgment.*Unless a party’s interest in the lands, against which judgment is sought for taxes, is made to appear, no objection in his behalf to the rendition of judgment can be entertained. If the land is not taxed in his name, he must show his interest.

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Martin R. M. Wallace, Judge, presiding.

This was an application by Louis C. Huck, as collector of Cook county, for judgment against certain lands. The court below sustained certain objections made by the appellees. Evidence was heard by the court below in support of the objections, and it does not appear that any question was made in the court below as to the objector’s right to resist the application.

Mr. Francis Adams, for the appellants.

Mr. John P. Wilson, for the appellees.

Per Curiam :

It is sufficient for the disposal of this case to say, that it does not appear from the record that appellees had any interest in any of the lands in question. No evidence *436was offered to that effect. The lands are not taxed in the names of appellees as owners.

Unless such interest is made to appear, no objections will be entertained which may be made by a person against a judgment for the sale of delinquent lands for taxes, as this court has heretofore decided.

The judgment will be reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
Figure 3.12. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the upstream vicinity of Blue Parkway.

94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20"

9°01'40"

9°01'50"

39°02'

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

Blue Parkway Brighton Avenue

 Hardesty Avenue

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 71,690 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 772 feet

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

>8 to 10

>10 to 12

>12 to 14

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

3

3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsInitial Flight Test of the Production Support Flight Control Computers at NASA Dryden Flight Research CenterThe NASA Dryden Flight Research Center has completed the initial flight test of a modified set of F/A-18 flight control computers that gives the aircraft a research control law capability. The production support flight control computers (PSFCC) provide an increased capability for flight research in the control law, handling qualities, and flight systems areas. The PSFCC feature a research flight control processor that is "piggybacked" onto the baseline F/A-18 flight control system. This research processor allows for pilot selection of research control law operation in flight. To validate flight operation, a replication of a standard F/A-18 control law was programmed into the research processor and flight-tested over a limited envelope. This paper provides a brief description of the system, summarizes the initial flight test of the PSFCC, and describes future experiments for the PSFCC.Document ID19990060322Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCarter, John*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards,CA United States)*Stephenson, Mark*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards,CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1999Publication InformationPublisher: American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsSubject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberAIAA Paper 99-4203NASA/TM-1999-206581H-2343NAS 1.15:206581Meeting InformationMeeting: Guidance, Navigation, and ControlLocation: Portland, ORCountry: United StatesStart Date: August 9, 1999End Date: August 11, 1999Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 529-30-24Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19990060322.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                             128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,071
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,194
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,213
<OTHER-SE>                                    (64,336)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   720
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (2)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Atmospheric Atomic Oxygen Source for Cleaning Smoke Damaged Art ObjectsSoot and other carbonaceous combustion products deposited on the surfaces of porous ceramic, stone, ivory and paper can be difficult to remove and can have potentially unsatisfactory results using wet chemical and/or abrasive cleaning techniques. An atomic oxygen source which operates in air at atmospheric pressure, using a mixture of oxygen and helium, has been developed to produce an atomic oxygen beam which is highly effective in oxidizing soot deposited on surfaces by burning candles made of paraffin, oil or rendered animal fat. Atomic oxygen source operating conditions and the results of cleaning soot from paper, gesso, ivory, limestone and water color-painted limestone are presented,Document ID19980227138Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsBanks, Bruce A.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Rutledge, Sharon K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Norris, Mary Jo*(Cleveland State Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1998Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberE-11343NASA/TM-1998-208506NAS 1.15:208506Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-23-2CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980227138.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §§986, 987. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section 986, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title VI, §611, 60 Stat. 1013, related to responsibility of Director General for efficiency records.

Section 987, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title VI, §612, 60 Stat. 1014, related to availability of records.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
### SUBCHAPTER X—LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS