alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMARRY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         134,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   82,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,657
<PP&E>                                         266,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 618,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           79,502
<BONDS>                                         77,887
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,150
<OTHER-SE>                                     249,111
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   618,710
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               325,931
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  265,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (273)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,548
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,276
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Alan RAZSI, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40433.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 27, 2006.

David Haskell Henderson, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Frank Warren Henderson, Amy R. Blalock, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tyler, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*361Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

James Alan Razsi (Razsi), a federal inmate, appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for assaulting Elmer Sorrell (Sorrell), another inmate, with a dangerous weapon with intent to do bodily harm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(3). Razsi asserts that the district court erred when it increased his base offense level by five levels under U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(3)(B) after finding that Sorrell had sustained serious bodily injury.

Section 2A2.2(b)(3)(B) of the Sentencing Guidelines requires a five-level increase to a base offense level if the victim of the offense sustained serious bodily injury. “ ‘Serious bodily injury’ means injury involving extreme physical pain or the protracted impairment of a function of a bodily member, organ, or mental faculty; or requiring medical intervention such as surgery, hospitalization, or physical rehabilitation.” U.S.S.G. § 1B1.1 cmt. n. 1(L) (2004); *see*U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2 cmt. n. 1 (2004).

The record indicates that Sorrell was treated, hospitalized, and given pain medication for multiple lacerations, depressed fractures in his frontal sinus cavity, bleeding from his left ear, swelling of his right cheek, and other scratches and abrasions. As a result of his injuries and pain, Sorrell received medical treatment, was hospitalized, was on a liquid diet, was unable to retrieve his own pain medication, and was only able to take the pain medication after it was crushed. Because of these facts, the district court’s application of the five-level increase to Razsi’s base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2A2.2(b)(3)(B) because Sorrell did sustain serious bodily injury was not clearly erroneous.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 702.231 Noncontroverted claims; payment of compensation without an award.

Unless the employer controverts its liability to pay compensation under this Act, the employer or insurance carrier shall pay periodically, promptly and directly to the person entitled thereto benefits prescribed by the Act. For this purpose, where the employer furnishes to an employee a copy of an audiogram with a report thereon, which indicates the employee has sustained a hearing loss causally related to factors of that employment, the employer or insurance carrier shall pay appropriate compensation or at that time controvert the liability to pay compensation under this Act.

[50 FR 399, Jan. 3, 1985]
### §1300n–1. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 106–568, title XIV, §1403, Dec. 27, 2000, 114 Stat. 2939, which set out definitions, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4286 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to eliminate the 

thresholds for reporting the identification of persons making contributions to political committees with respect to elections for Federal office. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. KIND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to 

eliminate the thresholds for reporting the identification 

of persons making contributions to political committees 

with respect to elections for Federal office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Campaign Trans5 parency Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4286 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF THRESHOLDS FOR REPORTING 

2 IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS MAKING CON3 TRIBUTIONS TO POLITICAL COMMITTEES IN 

4 FEDERAL ELECTIONS. 

5 (a) IDENTIFICATION OF PERSONS MAKING CON6 TRIBUTIONS.—Section 304(b)(3) of the Federal Election 

7 Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30104(b)(3)) is amend8 ed— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘whose 

10 contribution or contributions have an aggregate 

11 amount or value in excess of $200 within the cal12 endar year (or election cycle, in the case of an au13 thorized committee of a candidate for Federal of14 fice), or in any lesser amount if the reporting com15 mittee should so elect,’’; 

16 (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking ‘‘in an ag17 gregate amount or value in excess of $200 within 

18 the calendar year (or election cycle, in the case of 

19 an authorized committee of a candidate for Federal 

20 office)’’; and 

21 (3) in subparagraph (G), by striking ‘‘in an ag22 gregate value or amount in excess of $200 within 

23 the calendar year (or election cycle, in the case of 

24 an authorized committee of a candidate for Federal 

25 office)’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4286 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this Act shall apply with respect to reports required to 

3 be filed under section 304 of the Federal Election Cam4 paign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30104) on or after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Ogulei, DavidFrom: Nancy L Paddock <nancy.paddock@veoliaes.com>

Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 9:19 AMTo: Ogulei, DavidCc: Dennis J WarcholSubject: RE: PTE and Actual EmissionsAttachments: A5 Form PTE Summary%282 of 2%29rev5 (1).pdf

Thank you, David. I will take care of updating the table you sent ASAP. The revised PTE table is attached to this message; the HA

reflect a total of 29.44 TPY. The HAP PTE value in the August addendum was inaccurate due to a simple tabulation error. Is this a 

change? 

Thank you. 

Nancy Paddock Environmental Engineering Specialist 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201 618.271.2804 (x-115) 618.271.2128 (fax) 

Nancy.Paddock@VeoliaES.comwww.VeoliaES.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain con

information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please coreply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message and delete it from all computers. 

From: Ogulei, David [Ogulei.David@epa.gov] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 9:01 AM To: Nancy L Paddock Cc: Dennis J Warchol Subject: PTE and Actual Emissions

Hi Nancy,

Below is the table we discussed today. As we discussed, could you provide me with the data that’s missing from this table? Ycurrently have on page 18 of the addendum with this table. Also, please update the total HAPs value as we discussed, and inupdate. Thanks!
2

Pollutant Potential to 

Emit (PTE)

2012 Actual Emissions

2011 Actual Emissions

2010 Actual Emissions

2009 Actual Emissions

200Em

PM 13.93 1.12 1.1 1.07 PM10 12.55PM2.5SO2 66.19 0.49 0.49 0.52 

NOx 74.11 58.16 57.1 55.23 

VOM 15.63 1.51 1.62 1.74 CO 30.85 1.21 1.41 1.67 Lead 0.0968Total HAPs 21.41

Antimony (Sb)Arsenic (As) < 0.10Benzene < 0.40Beryllium (Be) < 0.05Cadmium (Cd)Chromium (Cr)Dioxins/FuransHydrogen Chloride (HCl) 1.89 2.03 2.09 LeadMercury (Hg) 0.055

Nickel (Ni)

Selenium (Se)Organic HAPs
3

David OguleiU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyRegion 5 | Air & Radiation Division | A-18J 77 West Jackson Blvd. | Chicago, Illinois 60604 Phone: (312) 353-0987 | Fax: (312) 692-2080Ogulei.David@epa.gov
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 830.17

 830.71

 831.45

 832.87

 833.12

 833.94

 834.74

 834.28

 835.00

 835.95

 835.97

 835.96

 836.37

 836.81

 836.98

 837.38

 837.74

 838.07

 838.32

 838.57

 839.05

 839.10

 839.43

 838.86

 838.34

 839.06

 839.45

 839.68

 839.20

 838.72

 838.55

 37.39

 37.99

 38.82

 40.43

 40.72

 41.67

 42.61

 42.07

 42.92

 44.06

 44.08

 44.07

 44.57

 45.10

 45.31

 45.80

 46.25

 46.66

 46.97

 47.28

 47.86

 47.95

 48.37

 47.65

 46.99

 47.90

 48.39

 48.69

 48.08

 47.47

 47.26

STORAGE

-0.30

+0.60

+0.83

+1.62

+0.29

+0.95

+0.94

-0.54

+0.85

+1.14

+0.02

-0.01

+0.50

+0.54

+0.21

+0.49

+0.45

+0.41

+0.31

+0.31

+0.58

+0.09

+0.42

-0.72

-0.65

+0.91

+0.49

+0.29

-0.61

-0.61

-0.21

CHANGE

3,674

2,634

2,468

1,967

1,835

2,484

4,093

2,528

1,809

2,538

2,469

1,923

1,761

1,086

1,048

941

906

886

839

837

1,168

1,070

1,344

1,341

990

1,198

1,373

2,387

1,829

1,400

1,163

INFLOW

 3,140

 1,650

 1,367

 470

 1,005

 1,321

 2,935

 2,119

 695

 1,292

 1,791

 1,260

 837

 145

 280

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 235

 380

 493

 1,061

 678

 741

 1,118

 2,228

 2,128

 1,697

 1,057

SPILL

 682

 682

 683

 683

 683

 683

 683

 683

 683

 671

 666

 666

 666

 666

 659

 659

 647

 647

 647

 647

 640

 640

 640

 640

 640

 0

 6

 6

 6

 6

 207

OUTLET

 2

 1

 1

 0

 2

 0

 0

 0

 2

 1

 0

 3

 7

 5

 4

 4

 5

 3

 5

 2

 2

 5

 0

 3

 1

 1

 0

 6

 2

 2

 7

C.F.S.

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .08

 .17

 .12

 .10

 .09

 .12

 .08

 .13

 .06

 .06

 .13

 .00

 .07

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .14

 .05

 .05

 .18

INCHES

 .00

 .26

 .15

 .04

 .00

 1.08

 .30

 .03

 .00

 1.14

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .24

 .38

 .00

 .47

 .22

 .04

 .20

 .99

 .18

 .05

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

MARCH 2019 RUN DATE: 06/06/2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +9.59 53,989 16,817 32,273 76 1.93 5.97

ACRE-FEET +9,590 107,087 33,357 64,013 151

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 64,013

OUTLET

TOTAL

 33,357

 97,370

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.97

JULY 1, 2018 29.98

 37.69

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 29.98
#### Max Herman, Defendant in Error, v. Wolf Herman, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 17,235.

Bills and *notes*— sufficiency *of evidence in action oil.*In an action on a collateral promissory note tried by a court without a jury, evidence held to sustain a finding for plaintiff.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William W. Maxwell, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1911.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 1, 1912.

Samuel J. Richman, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

*175Mr. Presiding Justice Clark

delivered the opinion, of the court.

Suit was brought upon a collateral promissory note. After a default was claimed to have been made in the payment of instalments due upon the note in accordance with its terms, the collateral was sold or alleged to have been' sold by the plaintiff. A claim of set-off was interposed by the defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $50.

From the record it would appear that the note was for the sum of $435; that $10 was paid upon it soon after its date; that the court allowed the defendant $300 as for the amount received on the sale of collateral, and also allowed $75 upon the claim of set-off. The argument presented rests entirely upon the questions of fact.

We have carefully examined the record, and are unable to say that the conclusion reached by the trial court was against the weight of the evidence, and the judgment will therefore be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
### §6592. Administrator of AID reporting to Secretary of State

The Administrator of the Agency for International Development, appointed pursuant to section 2384(a) of this title, shall report to and be under the direct authority and foreign policy guidance of the Secretary of State.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XV, §1522, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–794.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 709.30

 709.56

 709.80

 710.02

 710.25

 710.47

 710.66

 710.86

 711.04

 711.22

 711.39

 711.58

 719.12

 747.07

 742.62

 734.80

 725.06

 721.72

 725.92

 728.93

 731.20

 733.06

 734.66

 735.96

 735.19

 730.09

 725.92

 721.27

 715.74

 714.31

 716.33

 841

 849

 855

 862

 869

 875

 881

 887

 892

 898

 903

 908

 1,154

 2,399

 2,162

 1,785

 1,375

 1,249

 1,409

 1,531

 1,627

 1,708

 1,779

 1,838

 1,803

 1,580

 1,409

 1,232

 1,039

 993

 1,059

STORAGE

+7

+8

+6

+7

+7

+6

+6

+6

+5

+6

+5

+5

+246

+1,245

-237

-377

-410

-126

+160

+122

+96

+81

+71

+59

-35

-223

-171

-177

-193

-46

+66

CHANGE

5

5

4

5

5

4

4

4

4

4

4

4

124

762

135

57

36

49

82

63

49

42

37

31

19

12

11

8

1

18

34

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 134

 254

 247

 243

 113

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 37

 124

 97

 97

 98

 41

 1

 0850

 1000

 0933

 1055

 0935

TIME

 .09

 .25

 .03

 .06

 .03

COPPER

 .49

 1.14

 .44

 .21

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2009 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2009

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +225 1,622 0 1,504

ACRE-FEET +225 3,217 0 2,983

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,983

 2,983

 834

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .005

 .002

 .002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE THIRD
QUARTER 10-Q OF IOWA FIRST BANCSHARES CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN TIS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          12,465
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,075
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     19,232
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          44,829
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            44,994
<LOANS>                                        172,590
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 261,207
<DEPOSITS>                                     230,705
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,532
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,170
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 261,207
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,828
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,828
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   300
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,956
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,604
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,604
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,352
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (3)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,346
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,300
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,300
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,160
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,121
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
### §4114. Resolution of implementation disputes

#### (a) Grievance procedure

Any dispute between the Department and the exclusive representative concerning the effect, interpretation, or a claim of breach of a collective bargaining agreement shall be resolved through procedures negotiated by the Department and the exclusive representative. Any procedures negotiated under this section shall—

(1) be fair and simple,

(2) provide for expeditious processing, and

(3) include provision for appeal to the Foreign Service Grievance Board by either party of any dispute not satisfactorily settled.

#### (b) Review by Foreign Service Labor Relations Board

Either party to an appeal under subsection (a)(3) may file with the Board an exception to the action of the Foreign Service Grievance Board in resolving the implementation dispute. If, upon review, the Board finds that the action is deficient—

(1) because it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or

(2) on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations;

the Board may take such action and make such recommendations concerning the Foreign Service Grievance Board action as it considers necessary, consistent with applicable laws, rules, and regulations.

#### (c) Time of filing exceptions; finality and binding nature of action

If no exception to a Foreign Service Grievance Board action is filed under subsection (b) within 30 days after such action is communicated to the parties, such action shall become final and binding and shall be implemented by the parties.

#### (d) Judicial review

Resolutions of disputes under this section shall not be subject to judicial review.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §1014, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2137.)
#### § 702.332 Formal hearings; how conducted.

Formal hearings shall be conducted by the administrative law judge assigned the case by the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 554 *et seq.* All hearings shall be transcribed.
Exhibit 24.6

POWER OF ATTORNEY

As a director of NewPage Holding Corporation, a
Delaware corporation, and of NewPage Corporation, a Delaware corporation (collectively, the Company), I hereby constitute and appoint Douglas K. Cooper, David J. Prystash, and George F. Martin, and each of them, with full
power to act without the others, as my true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and re-substitution, for me and in my name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (Form 10-K), including all amendments and supplements to the Form 10-K, and to file the Form 10-K with all its exhibits and schedules and with all other documents in
connection with the Form 10-K, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto my attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about
the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as I might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that my attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue of this Power of Attorney.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Power of Attorney this 15th day of
February, 2011.



/s/ Lenard B. TesslerSignaturePrintName:

Lenard B. Tessler
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### §§ 655.36-655.39 [Reserved]