alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 832.46

 832.43

 832.40

 832.35

 832.31

 832.27

 832.23

 832.43

 832.55

 832.59

 832.70

 832.90

 833.06

 833.24

 833.36

 833.49

 833.61

 833.72

 833.82

 833.91

 834.01

 834.09

 834.20

 834.26

 834.31

 834.37

 834.43

 834.50

 834.61

 39.96

 39.93

 39.89

 39.84

 39.79

 39.74

 39.70

 39.93

 40.06

 40.11

 40.24

 40.47

 40.65

 40.86

 41.00

 41.15

 41.29

 41.41

 41.53

 41.64

 41.75

 41.85

 41.98

 42.05

 42.11

 42.18

 42.25

 42.33

 42.46

STORAGE

+0.00

-0.03

-0.03

-0.06

-0.05

-0.05

-0.05

+0.23

+0.14

+0.05

+0.13

+0.23

+0.18

+0.21

+0.14

+0.15

+0.14

+0.13

+0.12

+0.11

+0.12

+0.09

+0.13

+0.07

+0.06

+0.07

+0.07

+0.08

+0.13

CHANGE

29

12

12

1

6

7

6

144

99

43

80

133

109

121

88

95

87

83

76

70

76

64

83

58

50

54

53

59

85

INFLOW

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

SPILL

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 13

 14

 4

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 3

 4

 2

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 7

 6

 3

 2

 3

 4

C.F.S.

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .04

 .07

 .10

 .05

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .05

 .08

 .18

 .15

 .09

 .04

 .09

 .11

INCHES

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .23

 .68

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .05

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 RUN DATE: 03/20/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +2.51 1,883 122 435 65 1.78 1.29

ACRE-FEET +2,510 3,735 242 863 129

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 863

OUTLET

TOTAL

 242

 1,105

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.29

JULY 1, 2011 8.09

 39.96

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
### §7904. Trade-related barriers to export of greenhouse gas intensity reducing technologies

#### (a) In general

Not later than 1 year after August 8, 2005, the United States Trade Representative shall (as appropriate and consistent with applicable bilateral, regional, and mutual trade agreements)—

(1) identify trade-relations barriers maintained by foreign countries to the export of greenhouse gas intensity reducing technologies and practices from the United States to the developing countries identified in the report submitted under section 7902(a)(2)(A) of this title; and

(2) negotiate with foreign countries for the removal of those barriers.

#### (b) Annual report

Not later than 1 year after the date on which a report is submitted under subsection (a)(1) and annually thereafter, the United States Trade Representative shall submit to Congress a report that describes any progress made with respect to removing the barriers identified by the United States Trade Representative under subsection (a)(1).

(Pub. L. 101–240, title VII, §734, as added Pub. L. 109–58, title XVI, §1611, Aug. 8, 2005, 119 Stat. 1115.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 2005, except as otherwise provided, see section 739 of Pub. L. 101–240, set out as a note under section 7901 of this title.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4549 

AN ACT 

To require the Transportation Security Administration to 

conduct security screening at certain airports, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4549 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Treating Small Air3 ports with Fairness Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. CONDUCT OF SECURITY SCREENING BY THE TRANS5 PORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AT 

6 CERTAIN AIRPORTS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Administrator of the Trans8 portation Security Administration shall provide for secu9 rity screening to be conducted by the Transportation Secu10 rity Administration at, and provide all necessary staff and 

11 equipment to, any airport— 

12 (1) that lost commercial air service on or after 

13 January 1, 2013; and 

14 (2) the operator of which, following the loss de15 scribed in paragraph (1), submits to the Adminis16 trator— 

17 (A) a request for security screening to be 

18 conducted at such airport by the Transpor19 tation Security Administration; and 

20 (B) written confirmation of a commitment 

21 from a commercial air carrier— 

22 (i) that such air carrier intends to re23 sume commercial air service at such air24 port; and 

25 (ii) to resume such service not later 

26 than the date that is one year after the 
3 

•HR 4549 EH

1 date of the submission of the request 

2 under subparagraph (A). 

3 (b) DEADLINE.—Subject to the one-year limitation 

4 described in subsection (a)(2)(B)(ii), the Administrator of 

5 the Transportation Security Administration shall ensure 

6 that the process of implementing security screening by the 

7 Transportation Security Administration at an airport de8 scribed in subsection (a) is complete not later than the 

9 later of— 

10 (1) the date that is 90 days after the date on 

11 which the operator of such airport submits to the 

12 Administrator a request for such screening under 

13 paragraph (2)(A) of such subsection; or 

14 (2) the date on which the commercial air car15 rier that is the subject of such a request intends to 

16 resume commercial air service at such airport. 

17 (c) EFFECTS ON OTHER AIRPORTS.—The Adminis18 trator of the Transportation Security Administration shall 

19 carry out this section in a manner that does not negatively 

20 affect operations at airports not described in this section 
4 

•HR 4549 EH

1 that are otherwise provided security screening conducted 

2 by the Transportation Security Administration. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 13, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4549 

AN ACT 

To require the Transportation Security Administraports, and for other purposes. tion to conduct security screening at certain air-
EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-11178 of Stolt Nielsen S.A. on Form S-8 of our report dated June 24, 2005,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Stolt-Nielsen Inc.
Retirement Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Stamford, Connecticut
June 24, 2005
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

February-10

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-10 14 2 4 0 18 2 325 41 9 1 3 0 12 1 215 27 3,731 

2-Feb-10 8880 16 8 341 49 5 5 5 0 11 5 225 32 3,883 

3-Feb-10 20 17 24 0 44 17 385 66 13 11 16 0 29 11 254 44 3,980 

4-Feb-10 10 4 4 16 14 20 399 86 7 3 3 11 9 13 263 57 4,157 

5-Feb-10 42 0 56 6 98 6 497 92 28 0 37 4 65 4 328 61 3,042 

6-Feb-10 28 5 156 24 184 29 681 121 18 3 103 16 121 19 449 80 2,905 

7-Feb-10 26 8 161 4 187 12 868 133 17 5 106 3 123 8 573 88 2,970 

8-Feb-10 44 10 92 32 136 42 1,004 175 29 7 61 21 90 28 663 116 2,530 

9-Feb-10 60 18 128 56 188 74 1,192 249 40 12 84 37 124 49 787 164 3,159 

10-Feb-10 109 35 126 23 235 58 1,427 307 72 23 83 15 155 38 942 203 3,436 11-Feb-10 22 6 195 35 217 41 1,644 348 15 4 129 23 143 27 1,085 230 2,800 12-Feb-10 32 4 203 46 235 50 1,879 398 21 3 134 30 155 33 1,240 263 2,466 13-Feb-10 10 8 104 20 114 28 1,993 426 7 5 69 13 75 18 1,315 281 2,594 14-Feb-10 28 2 146 18 174 20 2,167 446 18 1 96 12 115 13 1,430 294 2,539 15-Feb-10 12 6 72 6 84 12 2,251 458 8 4 48 4 55 8 1,486 302 2,461 16-Feb-10 10 4 36 4 46 8 2,297 466 7 3 24 3 30 5 1,516 308 2,448 17-Feb-10 6 4 24 11 30 15 2,327 481 4 3 16 7 20 10 1,536 317 2,660 

18-Feb-10 12 4 15 0 27 4 2,354 485 8 3 10 0 18 3 1,554 320 2,208 19-Feb-10 14 0 30 8 44 8 2,398 493 9 0 20 5 29 5 1,583 325 3,415 20-Feb-10 6 4 24 0 30 4 2,428 497 4 3 16 0 20 3 1,602 328 3,194 

21-Feb-10 10 0 32 0 42 0 2,470 497 7 0 21 0 28 0 1,630 328 2,974 

22-Feb-10 * 0* 4 #VALUE! 4 #VALUE! 501 ###### 0 ###### 3 #VALUE! 3 #VALUE! 331 3,429 

23-Feb-10 * 0* 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 501 ###### 0 ###### 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 331 3,021 

24-Feb-10 * 0* 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 501 ###### 0 ###### 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 331 2,958 

25-Feb-10 * 0* 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 501 ###### 0 ###### 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 331 2,956 

26-Feb-10 * 0 * 20 #VALUE! 20 #VALUE! 521 ###### 0 ###### 13 #VALUE! 13 #VALUE! 344 2,967 

27-Feb-10 * 0* 8 #VALUE! 8 #VALUE! 529 ###### 0 ###### 5 #VALUE! 5 #VALUE! 349 2,774 

28-Feb-10 * 0* 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 529 ###### 0 ###### 0 #VALUE! 0 #VALUE! 349 2,967 

Total 523 149 1,640 341 #VALUE! 490 #VALUE! 529 ###### 98 ###### 225 #VALUE! 323 #VALUE! 349 84,626 10

* Represents number to be reported upon verification

Banks Tr
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,014.24

 1,014.35

 1,014.40

 1,014.38

 1,014.30

 1,014.21

 1,014.09

 1,014.06

 1,014.02

 1,014.02

 1,014.01

 1,014.00

 1,013.94

 1,013.82

 1,013.73

 1,013.61

 1,013.50

 1,013.37

 1,013.21

 1,013.28

 1,013.41

 1,013.16

 1,012.94

 1,012.72

 1,012.59

 1,012.46

 1,012.46

 1,012.42

 1,012.20

 1,012.10

 1,011.86

 3,150.0

 3,152.6

 3,153.7

 3,153.3

 3,151.4

 3,149.3

 3,146.5

 3,145.8

 3,144.8

 3,144.8

 3,144.6

 3,144.4

 3,143.0

 3,140.2

 3,138.1

 3,135.3

 3,132.7

 3,129.7

 3,125.9

 3,127.6

 3,130.6

 3,124.8

 3,119.6

 3,114.5

 3,111.5

 3,108.5

 3,108.5

 3,107.6

 3,102.5

 3,100.1

 3,094.6

STORAGE

-0.2

+2.6

+1.2

-0.5

-1.9

-2.1

-2.8

-0.7

-0.9

+0.0

-0.2

-0.2

-1.4

-2.8

-2.1

-2.8

-2.6

-3.0

-3.7

+1.6

+3.0

-5.8

-5.1

-5.1

-3.0

-3.0

+0.0

-0.9

-5.1

-2.3

-5.6

CHANGE

 4,110

 5,271

 4,391

 3,698

 3,862

 3,599

 3,438

 3,567

 3,438

 3,679

 3,465

 4,173

 3,467

 3,175

 3,350

 2,887

 2,857

 3,044

 3,435

 6,018

 6,397

 1,947

 2,253

 2,492

 3,285

 3,477

 4,728

 4,350

 2,287

 3,786

 2,094

INFLOW

 4,125

 3,894

 3,745

 3,872

 4,718

 4,546

 4,788

 3,908

 3,808

 3,645

 3,569

 4,243

 4,104

 4,539

 4,368

 4,237

 4,048

 4,526

 5,243

 5,125

 4,793

 4,785

 4,797

 4,999

 4,745

 4,931

 4,667

 4,791

 4,813

 4,903

 4,867

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 103

 76

 55

 62

 90

 117

 69

 14

 103

 34

 14

 48

 69

 48

 41

 62

 103

 48

 75

 69

 75

 103

 41

 68

 61

 68

 61

 27

 48

 54

 27

C.F.S.

 .15

 .11

 .08

 .09

 .13

 .17

 .10

 .02

 .15

 .05

 .02

 .07

 .10

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .15

 .07

 .11

 .10

 .11

 .15

 .06

 .10

 .09

 .10

 .09

 .04

 .07

 .08

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .26

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .41

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2011 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 7, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -55.4 112,020 138,142 0 0 1,933 2.82 .69

ACRE-FEET -55,400 222,192 274,005 0 0 3,834

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 274,005

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 274,005

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .69

JULY 1, 2011 8.47

 3,150.2

Table 3
#### Borough of Stonington *vs.*Benjamin F. States and others.

The charter of the borough of Stonington confers upon the borough power to layout and construct new highways within its limits; but it imposes no obligation to do it and confers no authority upon the courts in respect to them.

No obligation rest upon any territorial or municipal corporation in this state to lay out, construct or repair highways, except where such obligation is imposed by statute. Since the repeal, in 1856, of the former statute imposing that duty upon boroughs, there has been no law requiring boroughs to lay out or maintain highways within their limits.

A judgment void by reason of want of jurisdiction in the court, may be reversed upon writ of error. The writ is given by statute in the case of every final judgment.

Writs of error in such cases have been sustained at common law, in this country and in England, and even where brought by the original plaintiff.

Writ of error from a decree of the 'superior court against *214the borough of Stonington, upon the petition of the defendants in error, laying out a highway within the borough and ordering its construction.

*Hovey,*for the plaintiffs in error.

*Lippett,*for the defendants in error.

Butler, J.

No obligation rest upon any territorial or municipal corporation in this state by the common law to lay out, construct or repair highways, and no application can be made to any court to enforce such obligation, unless it is imposed and the process is given by express statutory provision. The charter of the borough of Stonington confers power to lay out and construct new highways within its limits, but imposes no obligation to do it, and confers no authority upon the courts in respect to them. A provision in the general act relative to highways, which first appeared in the revision of 1821, did impose such an obligation upon all boroughs, and confer upon the county court the same power to enforce it which was applicable to towns. But that section of the law was repealed in 1856, and the obligation upon the borough and the jurisdiction of the court ceased upon such repeal. And no agreement or consent of parties could authorize the court to entertain the petition and render the judgment complained of, and it was *utterly*void.

And notwithstanding the judgment complained of was void, and not merely erroneous, we are satisfied that the plaintiffs in error were entitled to bring their writ to annul it. The statute (Rev. Stat., tit. 1, sec. 163,) gives in general terms a right to the writ, and we know of no reason why it should be construed to limit the right so as not to embrace cases where the judgment sought to be reversed is void for want of jurisdiction in the court. Such writs have been sustained at common law, by the courts of the United States, in the neighboring states, and in England, and even where brought by the original plaintiff in the void suit. *Jordan*v. *Dennis,*7 Met., 590.

*215There is manifest error, and judgment should be rendered for the plaintiffs in error.

In this opinion the other judges concurred.
#### John H. Meyers *et al. v.*Edgar E. Andrews.

1. *Continuance—affidavit must show diligence.*An affidavit for a continuance, which fails to show diligence in attempting to obtain the desired testimony, is insufficient.

2. *Error—should he assigned.*If a party desires to urge the refusal of the court to grant a continuance, he should assign the same for error.

*434Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Whiteside county; the Hon. W. W. Heaton, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Kilgour & Manahan, for the plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Bennett & Green, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was assumpsit, in the Whiteside circuit court, by John H. Meyers & Co., doing business as commission merchants and dealers in butter and eggs, in the city of Hew York, plaintiffs, and against Edgar E. Andrews, a dealer in the same articles in the city of Sterling, in this State, defendant. The claim of plaintiffs was for money overpaid defendant on consignments of butter and eggs. The plea was *non-assumpsit,*with a plea of set-off claiming as under the common counts, accompanied by a bill of particulars.

There was a trial by jury, and a verdict returned for the defendant, on which judgment was rendered, to reverse which plaintiffs sued out this writ of error.

The first point they make is that the court refused them a continuance on the affidavit of Charles H. Laur, who had acted as attorney of the plaintiffs.

On the record twelve errors are assigned, this not being one of them. But waiving that, we have examined the affidavits and fail to find any evidence of diligence on the part of the plaintiffs to obtain the desired testimony. They knew, by the papers on file, that defendant claimed there was a sale of the butter to them at twenty-two cents per pound and not a consignment, and they had time to prepare to contest such a claim. They can not justly claim they were surprised on the trial by the character of the defense.

Upon the merits, the contest was as to the nature of this transaction. Was it a sale of the butter at a specified price, or a consignment merely, to abide the state of the market? There is ground for controversy on this point. Witnesses have been *435fully heard on both sides, and we can not say the evidence does not sustain the verdict. We are inclined to hold, the butter was sold to plaintiffs in error for twenty-two cents per pound, at Sterling, to be paid on and after the sale. We think this is the weight of the testimony.

These are all the points which are argued. They are not sustained, and the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
### **CHAPTER 4—HIGHWAY SAFETY**

Sec.
401.
Authority of the Secretary.
402.
Highway safety programs.
403.
Highway safety research and development.
404.
High-visibility enforcement program.
405.
National priority safety programs.
406.
General requirements for Federal assistance.
407.
Discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and surveys.
408.
Agency accountability.
[409.
Renumbered.]
[410, 411. Repealed.]
[412.
Renumbered.]

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

**2021**—Pub. L. 117–58, div. B, title IV, §24101(d)(2), Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 785, which directed amendment of this analysis by striking out items 406 to 412 and adding new items 406 to 408, was executed by adding new items 406 to 408 and striking out items 409 "Discovery and admission as evidence of certain reports and surveys" and 412 "Agency accountability" to reflect the probable intent of Congress, as items 406 to 408, 410, and 411 had already been struck out by Pub. L. 112–141. See 2012 Amendment note below.

**2015**—Pub. L. 114–94, div. A, title IV, §4004(b), Dec. 4, 2015, 129 Stat. 1501, substituted "High-visibility enforcement program" for "National Highway Safety Advisory Committee" in item 404.

**2012**—Pub. L. 112–141, div. C, title I, §§31105(b), 31109(b)–(f), July 6, 2012, 126 Stat. 755–757, substituted "National priority safety programs" for "Occupant protection incentive grants" in item 405 and struck out items 406 "Safety belt performance grants", 407 "Innovative project grants", 408 "State traffic safety information system improvements", 410 "Alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures", and 411 "State highway safety data improvements".

**2005**—Pub. L. 109–59, title II, §§2005(b), 2006(b), 2008(b), Aug. 10, 2005, 119 Stat. 1527, 1529, 1535, substituted "Safety belt performance grants" for "School bus driver training" in item 406 and "State traffic safety information system improvements" for "Alcohol traffic safety programs" in item 408 and added item 412.

**1998**—Pub. L. 105–178, title II, §§2003(a)(2), 2005(b), June 9, 1998, 112 Stat. 327, 334, substituted "Occupant protection incentive grants" for "Repealed" in item 405 and added item 411.

**1991**—Pub. L. 102–240, title I, §1035(b), title II, §2004(c), Dec. 18, 1991, 105 Stat. 1978, 2079, substituted "Discovery and admission" for "Admission" in item 409 and "Alcohol-impaired driving countermeasures" for "Drunk driving prevention programs" in item 410.

**1988**—Pub. L. 100–690, title IX, §9002(b), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4525, added item 410.

**1987**—Pub. L. 100–17, title I, §132(b), Apr. 2, 1987, 101 Stat. 170, added item 409.

**1982**—Pub. L. 97–364, title I, §101(b), Oct. 25, 1982, 96 Stat. 1740, added item 408.

**1978**—Pub. L. 95–599, title II, §208(b), Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2732, added item 407.

**1976**—Pub. L. 94–280, title I, §135(d), May 5, 1976, 90 Stat. 442, substituted item 405 "Repealed" for "Federal-aid safer roads demonstration program".

**1975**—Pub. L. 93–643, §126(b), Jan. 4, 1975, 88 Stat. 2291, added item 406.

**1973**—Pub. L. 93–87, title II, §230(b), Aug. 13, 1973, 87 Stat. 294, added item 405.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549
                             ----------------------
                                    FORM 6-K

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



                             Date: February 9, 2005



                               Given Imaging Ltd.
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



                   13 Ha'Yetzira Street, Yoqneam 20692, Israel
                    (Address of principal executive offices)



     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                     Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                ---                       ---



         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the
information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to
the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

                     Yes                       No   X
                         ---                       ---

<PAGE>

                                EXPLANATORY NOTE


     On February 8, 2005, Given Imaging Ltd. issued a press release entitled
"Given Imaging Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results." A copy of the
press release is attached to this Form 6-K as Exhibit 99.1.


                                       2
<PAGE>



                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                        GIVEN IMAGING LTD.


Date: February 9, 2005                  By:  /s/ Zvi Ben David
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Zvi Ben David
                                           Title: Vice President and Chief
                                                  Financial Officer


                                       3
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX
                                  -------------

Exhibit    Description
-------    -----------
99.1       Press release dated February 8, 2005, entitled "Given Imaging Reports
           Fourth Quarter and Full Year Results."


                                       4