alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 712.26

 712.42

 712.57

 712.70

 712.77

 712.90

 713.03

 713.09

 713.18

 713.24

 713.30

 713.42

 713.53

 713.57

 713.61

 713.68

 713.73

 713.76

 713.86

 713.90

 713.96

 714.00

 714.03

 714.04

 714.05

 714.07

 714.08

 714.10

 714.12

 714.12

 714.12

 929

 934

 938

 942

 944

 948

 952

 954

 957

 959

 961

 964

 968

 969

 971

 973

 974

 975

 979

 980

 982

 983

 984

 984

 985

 985

 986

 986

 987

 987

 987

STORAGE

+4

+5

+4

+4

+2

+4

+4

+2

+3

+2

+2

+3

+4

+1

+2

+2

+1

+1

+4

+1

+2

+1

+1

+0

+1

+0

+1

+0

+1

+0

+0

CHANGE

2

3

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2001 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 17, 2001

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +62 37 0 0

ACRE-FEET +62 73 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 925

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

________________________

No. ACM S32525

________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Romel A. ALBERSON

Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________

Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 22 January 2019

________________________

Military Judge: Christina M. Jimenez.

Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 15 days, and

reduction to E-1. Sentence adjudged 23 April 2018 by SpCM convened 

at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. 

For Appellant: Major Meghan R. Glines-Barney, USAF.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen Payne, 

Esquire.

Before JOHNSON, DENNIS, and LEWIS, Appellate Military Judges.

________________________

This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as 

precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

________________________

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 
United States v. Alberson, No. ACM S32525

2

59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE

Clerk of the Court
#### Dell Publishing Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Ned L. Pines et al., Doing Business under the Name of Nedor Publishing Company, Appellants.

Ro opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Martin, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint. Settle order on notice.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40254

Conference Calendar

 

MANLEY CARGILL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

MARVIN D. MORRISON,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:02-CV-794

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Manley Cargill, federal prisoner # 41436-004, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in

which he challenged his convictions for a continuing criminal

enterprise and drug conspiracies pursuant to Rutledge v. United

States, 517 U.S. 292 (1996). Cargill cannot establish that he

meets the standard for filing a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition under

the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 because Rutledge was

available at the time Cargill filed his first 28 U.S.C. § 2255
No. 03-40254

-2-

motion. See Reyes-Requena v. United States, 243 F.3d 893, 904

(5th Cir. 2001). Cargill is incorrect in his assertion that

Rutledge was unavailable at the time he filed his first 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 motion because such a claim would have been untimely. See

28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 6; United States v. Flores, 135 F.3d 1000,

1005-06 (5th Cir. 1998). The “savings clause” does not violate

the Suspension Clause of the Constitution. Reyes-Requena, 243

F.3d at 901 n.19. Consequently, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**DateI, E. Todd Whittemore, Executive Vice President of Aurora Loan Services LLC., certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, ofStructured Asset Securities CorporationMortgage Pass-Through Certificates2005-GEL2;Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a  whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and  based on upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; andThe reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:TitleU.S. Bank National Association, as TrusteeSignature1.2.3.4.5. 3/29/06                                                                                                            /s/ E. Todd Whittemore                                                                                                 Executive Vice PresidentColonial Savings, F.A., as ServicerOcwen Loan Servicing, LLC as successor in interest to Ocwen Federal Bank FSB, as ServicerWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer
#### § 702.143 Establishment of special fund.

Congress, by section 44 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 944, established in the U.S. Treasury a special fund, to be administered by the Secretary. The Treasurer of the United States is the custodian of such fund, and all monies and securities in such fund shall be held in trust by the Treasurer and shall not be money or property of the United States. The Treasurer shall make disbursements from such funds only upon the order of the Director, OWCP, as delegatee of the Secretary. The Act requires that the Treasurer give bond, in an amount to be fixed and with securities to be approved by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Comptroller General of the United States, conditioned upon the faithful performance of his duty as custodian of such fund.
§ 404.1519a When we will purchase a consultative examination and how we will use it. ( a ) *General.* If we cannot get the information we need from your medical sources, we may decide to purchase a consultative examination. See § 404.1512 for the procedures we will follow to obtain evidence from your medical sources and § 404.1520b for how we consider evidence. Before purchasing a consultative examination, we will consider not only existing medical reports, but also the disability interview form containing your allegations as well as other pertinent evidence in your file.
( b ) *Situations that may require a consultative examination.* We may purchase a consultative examination to try to resolve an inconsistency in the evidence, or when the evidence as a whole is insufficient to allow us to make a determination or decision on your claim. Some examples of when we might purchase a consultative examination to secure needed medical evidence, such as clinical findings, laboratory tests, a diagnosis, or prognosis, include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) The additional evidence needed is not contained in the records of your medical sources;
( 2 ) The evidence that may have been available from your treating or other medical sources cannot be obtained for reasons beyond your control, such as death or noncooperation of a medical source;
( 3 ) Highly technical or specialized medical evidence that we need is not available from your treating or other medical sources; or
( 4 ) There is an indication of a change in your condition that is likely to affect your ability to work, but the current severity of your impairment is not established.
[56 FR 36956, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended at 77 FR 10655, Feb. 23, 2012]
§ 422.605 Request for review. We will review an assignment if you request review and show that there is a prima facie case of error regarding the assignment. This review is a review on the record and will not entail a face-to-face hearing. We will review an assignment if: ( a ) You are an assigned operator (or related person);
( b ) Your request is in writing and states your reasons for believing the assignment is erroneous;
( c ) Your request is filed with us no later than 30 days from the date you received the detailed information described in § 422.604, or no later than 30 days from the date you received the notice of assignment if you choose not to request detailed information. Unless you submit evidence showing a later receipt of the notice, we will assume you received the detailed information or the notice of assignment within 5 days of the date shown thereon. We will consider the request to be filed as of the date we receive it. However, if we receive the request after the 30-day period, the postmark date on the envelope may be used as the filing date. If there is no postmark or the postmark is illegible, the filing date will be deemed to be the fifth day prior to the day we received the request; and
( d ) Your request is accompanied by evidence establishing a prima facie case of error regarding the assignment. If your request for review includes a request for additional time to submit such evidence, we will give you an additional 90 days from the date of your request for review to submit such evidence to us.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4240 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4240

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To require an independent review of the operation and administration of 
   the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB) maintained by the Federal 
    Bureau of Investigation and subsets of the TSDB, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Fly for Foreign Fighters Act''.

SEC. 2. GAO STUDY ON THE TERRORIST SCREENING DATABASE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States shall conduct 
a study and submit, to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate, a 
report on--
            (1) whether past weaknesses in the operation and 
        administration of the Terrorist Screening Database (hereinafter 
        referred to as the ``TSDB'') and subsets of the TSDB have been 
        addressed; and
            (2) the extent to which existing vulnerabilities to the 
        United States may be addressed or mitigated through additional 
        changes to the TSDB and subsets of the TSDB, thereby enhancing 
        America's security and defenses.
    (b) Required Information.--The study and report under subsection 
(a) shall include information on the extent to which--
            (1) information is being integrated into the TSDB from all 
        relevant sources across the government in a timely manner;
            (2) agencies are able to comply with increased demands for 
        information to improve the TSDB;
            (3) the TSDB, and relevant subsets of the TSDB, are 
        accessible to agencies, authorities, and other entities, as 
        appropriate; and
            (4) the TSDB is capable of enabling users to identify known 
        or suspected terrorists in the most timely and comprehensive 
        manner possible.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 27, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4240

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To require an independent review of the operation and administration of 
   the Terrorist Screening Database (TSDB) maintained by the Federal 
    Bureau of Investigation and subsets of the TSDB, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
§ 702.431 Grounds for debarment. A physician or health care provider shall be debarred if it is found, after appropriate investigation as described in § 702.414 and proceedings under §§ 702.432 and 702.433, that such physician or health care provider has: ( a ) Knowingly and willfully made, or caused to be made, any false statement or misrepresentation of a material fact for use in a claim for compensation or claim for reimbursement of medical expenses under this Act;
( b ) Knowingly and willfully submitted, or caused to be submitted, a bill or request for payment under this Act containing a charge which the Director finds to be substantially in excess of the charge for the service, appliance, or supply prevailing within the community or in excess of the provider's customary charges, unless the Director finds there is good cause for the bill or request containing the charge;
( c ) Knowingly and willfully furnished a service, appliance, or supply which is determined by the Director to be substantially in excess of the need of the recipient thereof or to be of a quality which substantially fails to meet professionally recognized standards;
( d ) Been convicted under any criminal statute, without regard to pending appeal thereof, for fraudulent activities in connection with federal or state program for which payments are made to physicians or providers of similar services, appliances, or supplies; or has otherwise been excluded from participation in such program.
( e ) The fact that a physician or health care provider has been convicted of a crime previously described in (d), or excluded or suspended, or has resigned in lieu of exclusion or suspension, from participation in any program as described in (d), shall be a prima facie finding of fact for purposes of section 7(j)(2) of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 907(j)(2).
[50 FR 404, Jan. 3, 1985]
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.2055 Mandatory minimum supplementation reduced.

If for any month after December 1973 there is a change with respect to any special need or special circumstance which, if such change had existed in December 1973, would have caused a reduction in the amount of such individual's aid or assistance payment, then, for such month and for each month thereafter, the amount of the mandatory minimum supplement payable to such individual may, at the option of the State, be reduced in accordance with the terms and conditions of the State's plan approved under title I, X, XIV, or XVI of the Act in effect for the month of June 1973.
94°32' 94°31' 94°30' 94°29' 94°28' 

39°00' 

39°01' 

39°02' 

39°03' 

39°04' 

39°05' 

39°06' 

39°07' 

39°08' 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Prepared in cooperation with the 

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2006–5089

Missouri River backwater inundation of 738.9 feet—PLATE 5.5

Kelly, B.P., Rydlund, P.H., Jr., 2006

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

By

Brian P. Kelly and Paul H. Rydlund, Jr.

2006

* #

* #

* #

* #

A B C D E F 

13 

12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003 

 and City of Kansas City, Missouri, digital data, 1:833, 2004

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

* #

U.S. Geological Survey 

stage gage at 12th Street 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at Blue Parkway 

National Weather Service

flood-forecast location 

at Highway 40

U.S. Geological Survey streamflow 

gage at Stadium Drive 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at 63rd Street 

I - 435 

I-435 

Hawthorne Road 

 Trafficway 

Clary Boulevard 

I-70 

23rd Street 

U S Highway 40 

17th Street 

Road I - 435 

R

a

yto

wn

Coal Mine Road

Van Brunt 

Boulevard

Avenue 

Hard

esty

63rd Steet Brighton

L

e

wis

R

oad

67th

Street

Manchester

Gregory Boulevard

Drive Crest

A

venue

0 0.5 1 KILOMETER 

0 0.5 1 MILE 

FORECAST LOCATION STAGE STAGE ELEVATION 

12TH STREET 24.5 738.9

HIGHWAY 40 17.3 738.9

STADIUM DRIVE 20.6 738.9

BLUE PARKWAY 16.4 738.9

63RD STREET 17.1 738.9

MISSOURI RIVER AT KANSAS CITY 42.6 749.0

MISSOURI RIVER BACKWATER INUNDATION 

WATER DEPTH, IN FEET, AT STAGE ELEVATION 

 OF 738.9 FEET AT THE BLUE RIVER GAGES

 >, greater than

 0 to 1

 >1 to 2

 >2 to 5

 >5 to 10

 >10

LAND SURFACE BELOW RIVER STAGE

 (levee protected or unconnected to river)

STUDY AREA

GAGE OR FLOOD-FORECAST LOCATION

 (ALERT, Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time)

# *

EXPLANATION
### SUBCHAPTER IV—BENEFICIARIES AND PENSIONS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7371

PETER K. MUKURIA , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE, Head Director of VDOC; RANDALL MATHENA, Warden; Red Onion State Prison; DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operation; GERALD KEITH WASHINGTON, Regional Operations Chief; JEFFREY ARTRIP, EBP Manager Red Onion State Prison; DUAL TREATMENT TEAM, Red Onion State Prison , Defendants

- Appellees

.
Appeal from th e United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. James P. Jones , District Judge. ( 7:15

- cv
- 00172

- JPJ

- RSB )

Submitted : November 30, 2017 Decided: December 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Peter K. Mukuria, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Peter K. Mukuria appeals the district court ’ s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm f or the reasons stated by the district

court. Mukuria v. Clarke , No. 7:15

- cv
- 00172

- JPJ

- RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2016)

. We deny Mukuria’s motions to appoint counsel and to file an exhibit. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contenti ons are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 667

 689

 733

 734

 636

 512

 491

 456

 0

 0

 0

 575

 0

 0

 0

 0

 439

 447

 386

 415

 456

 430

 398

 389

 362

 465

 538

 587

 490

 550

 412

 154

 153

 162

 158

 155

 158

 155

 161

 0

 0

 0

 184

 0

 0

 0

 0

 146

 152

 149

 153

 162

 173

 171

 177

 165

 150

 143

 155

 154

 154

 151

 332

 341

 364

 362

 329

 317

 310

 305

 0

 0

 0

 322

 0

 0

 0

 0

 297

 295

 279

 281

 298

 301

 295

 278

 257

 262

 285

 313

 281

 290

 283

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §6a. Disposition of amounts deducted from pensions

Pensions of inmates of a naval hospital, required by law prior to July 1, 1943, to be deducted from the account of the pensioner and applied for the benefit of the fund from which such home or 1 hospital is maintained, shall be deposited into the Treasury of the United States as miscellaneous receipts.

(June 15, 1943, ch. 125, §3, 57 Stat. 153; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title XV, §1533(c)(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1736.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–510 struck out "naval home or" before "naval hospital".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–510 effective one year after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 1541(a) of Pub. L. 101–510, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under section 401 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Act June 15, 1943, ch. 125, §3, 57 Stat. 153, provided that this section is effective July 1, 1943.

1 So in original. The words "home or" probably should not appear after amendment by Pub. L. 101–510, see 1990 Amendment note below.