alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

October-11

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to change

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily Total 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CFS 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 7,095 4,013 

2-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,719 4,172 

3-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,253 4,164 

4-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,691 4,159 

5-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,691 4,006 

6-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,691 4,045 

7-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 5,590 4,095 

8-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 5,208 4,106 

9-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,725 4,109 

10-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,662 4,037 11-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,662 3,999 12-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,663 3,990 13-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,594 4,052 14-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,710 4,074 15-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,757 4,046 16-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 7,038 4,037 17-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,663 4,029 

18-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,663 4,027 19-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,066 4,044 

20-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,090 4,032 

21-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 5,590 4,019 

22-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 7,368 4,005 23-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 8,083 3,820 

24-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,692 4,019 

25-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,340 4,102 

26-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,344 4,110 27-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,340 4,079 

28-Oct-11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 489 4 114 

Banks Tracy C

28 Oct 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6,489 4,114 29-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,719 4,095 30-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,719 4,110 31-Oct-11 0000 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 6,652 1,994 

Total 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 203,569 123,703
EXHIBIT 11


                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

                 Nine Month Period Ended September 30,
                             2002 and 2001
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(Dollars in Thousands)

                                               2002          2001

 <c>                                        <c>
Primary
    Net Income                                 $        4,939         $         3,854
    Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding                     2,974,288               2,975,180
    Adjustments - increases or
       decreases                                         None                    None
    Weighted average number of
       common shares outstanding
       as adjusted                                  2,974,288               2,975,180

    Primary earnings per common
     share                                   $         1.66      $        1.30


Assuming full dilution
    Net Income                                 $        4,939         $         3,854
    Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding                     2,974,288               2,975,180
   Adjustments - increases or
      decreases                                          None                    None
   Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      as adjusted                                   2,974,288               2,975,180

   Earnings per common share
      assuming full dilution                 $         1.66      $        1.30

45:   </TABLE>

                                 23
(No. 73-CC-169

#### Root Brothers Manufacturing and Supply Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 27, 1973.*

Korshak, Rothman, Oppenheim and Finnegan, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 680.330 How can Individual Training Accounts, supportive services, and needs-related payments be used to support placing participating adults and dislocated workers into a registered apprenticeship program and support participants once they are in a registered apprenticeship program? Registered apprenticeships automatically qualify to be a on a State's eligible training provider list (ETPL) as described in § 680.470. ( a ) ITAs can be used to support placing participants in registered apprenticeship through: ( 1 ) Pre-apprenticeship training, as defined in § 681.480 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Training services provided under a registered apprenticeship program.
( b ) Supportive services may be provided as described in §§ 680.900 and 680.910.
( c ) Needs-related payments may be provided as described in §§ 680.930, 680.940, 680.950, 680.960, and 680.970.
( d ) Work-based training options also may be used to support participants in registered apprenticeship programs (*see* §§ 680.740 and 680.750).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 415.07

 415.07

 416.18

 416.55

 416.60

 416.31

 416.33

 417.35

 416.20

 416.15

 416.64

 417.22

 418.03

 419.17

 420.51

 421.88

 423.60

 424.65

 425.30

 426.11

 427.19

 427.94

 428.13

 428.53

 428.43

 428.80

 429.46

 430.07

 430.39

 430.72

 647,748

 647,748

 657,334

 660,542

 660,975

 658,461

 658,634

 667,496

 657,508

 657,075

 661,323

 666,364

 673,429

 683,419

 695,232

 707,387

 722,760

 732,205

 738,075

 745,402

 755,210

 762,047

 763,782

 767,440

 766,525

 769,912

 775,968

 781,579

 784,527

 787,573

STORAGE

-1,982

+0

+9,586

+3,208

+433

-2,514

+173

+8,862

-9,988

-433

+4,248

+5,041

+7,065

+9,990

+11,813

+12,155

+15,373

+9,445

+5,870

+7,327

+9,808

+6,837

+1,735

+3,658

-915

+3,387

+6,056

+5,611

+2,948

+3,046

CHANGE

2,324

3,082

5,570

2,383

2,544

2,543

2,544

4,304

0

0

2,546

2,635

3,826

5,285

6,107

6,211

8,039

5,009

3,170

3,924

5,428

3,325

2,803

2,400

3,346

3,354

3,353

3,693

2,527

2,166

PUMPING

 2,887

 2,413

 0

 0

 2,193

 3,615

 3,064

 0

 5,728

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,938

 0

 3,582

 1,358

 0

 577

 720

 507

POWER

 268

 269

 252

 247

 214

 186

 140

 132

 114

 109

 116

 134

 124

 134

 124

 128

 134

 197

 238

 223

 235

 230

 223

 226

 232

 245

 232

 240

 236

 424

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-167

-400

-486

-519

+82

-10

+747

+296

+807

-109

-288

+40

-140

-114

-28

+45

-155

-50

+28

-7

-249

+352

+234

-330

+8

-43

-67

-47

-85

+300

OR

 53

 42

 50

 48

 51

 45

 20

 81

 0

 42

 17

 34

 20

 17

 29

 20

 20

 15

 18

 21

 12

 18

 27

 33

 6

 21

 21

 18

 15

 6

C.F.S.

 .19

 .15

 .18

 .17

 .18

 .16

 .07

 .29

 .00

 .15

 .06

 .12

 .07

 .06

 .10

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .06

 .07

 .04

 .06

 .09

 .11

 .02

 .07

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 1.35

 .46

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR December 19, 2002

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2002 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +137,843 104,441 28,582 6,006 0 -355 820 2.86 2.04

ACRE-FEET +137,843 207,159 56,692 11,913 0 -704 1,626

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 56,692

PACHECO TUNNEL 11,913 TOTAL 68,605

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 2.04

 649,730

SPILL 0 2.04

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
### §9547. Termination

The provisions of this subchapter shall terminate on the date that is 5 years after August 2, 2017.

(Pub. L. 115–44, title II, §258, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 934.)
495 P.2d 379

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John A. SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 834.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

March 10, 1972.

Dennis R. Francish, Albuquerque, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., James PI. Russell, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

*600OPINION

HENDLEY, Judge,

Convicted of burglary, contrary to § 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol.1964), defendant appeals. Pie asserts the trial court erred in failing to direct a verdict of acquittal at the close of the State’s case.

We affirm.

This case involves the burglary of an automobile. Defendant’s witness Montano testified that defendant was unaware that he (Montano) was removing a stereo tape deck from the automobile. State witnesses testified that defendant and Montano looked into another car before Montano broke into the burglarized car; that defendant leaned on the door of the burglarized car and was “looking both ways as if observing for something.” This evidence is sufficient to sustain defendant’s conviction as an aider and abettor. State v. Atwood, 83 N.M. 416, 492 P.2d 1279 (Ct.App.1971).

Defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of the State’s case was denied. He then proceeded with his case in chief. After defendant closed he failed to renew his motion for a directed verdict. If there was error in the denial of the motion at the close of the State’s case in chief it was waived by the subsequent introduction of evidence and failure to renew the motion. State v. Phipps, 47 N.M. 316, 142 P.2d 550 (1943); State v. Hunt, (Ct.App.) 83 N.M. 546, 494 P.2d 624, 1972.

Defendant’s implied contention of fundamental error is without merit. The innocence of defendant is not indisputable and it does not shock the conscience to permit the conviction to stand. State v. Torres, 78 N.M. 597, 435 P.2d 216 (Ct.App.1967).

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and SUTIN, J., concur.
§ 682.320 What is layoff aversion, and what are appropriate layoff aversion strategies and activities? ( a ) Layoff aversion consists of strategies and activities, including those provided in paragraph (b) of this section and §§ 682.330 and 682.340, to prevent or minimize the duration of unemployment resulting from layoffs.
( b ) Layoff aversion activities may include: ( 1 ) Providing assistance to employers in managing reductions in force, which may include early identification of firms at risk of layoffs, assessment of the needs of and options for at-risk firms, and the delivery of services to address these needs, as provided by WIOA sec. 134(d)(1)(A)(ix)(II)(cc);
( 2 ) Ongoing engagement, partnership, and relationship-building activities with businesses in the community, in order to create an environment for successful layoff aversion efforts and to enable the provision of assistance to dislocated workers in obtaining reemployment as soon as possible;
( 3 ) Funding feasibility studies to determine if a company's operations may be sustained through a buyout or other means to avoid or minimize layoffs;
( 4 ) Developing, funding, and managing incumbent worker training programs or other worker upskilling approaches as part of a layoff aversion strategy or activity;
( 5 ) Connecting companies to: ( i ) Short-time compensation or other programs designed to prevent layoffs or to reemploy dislocated workers quickly, available under Unemployment Insurance programs;
( ii ) Employer loan programs for employee skill upgrading; and
( iii ) Other Federal, State, and local resources as necessary to address other business needs that cannot be funded with resources provided under this title;
( 6 ) Establishing linkages with economic development activities at the Federal, State, and local levels, including Federal Department of Commerce programs and available State and local business retention and expansion activities;
( 7 ) Partnering or contracting with business-focused organizations to assess risks to companies, propose strategies to address those risks, implement services, and measure impacts of services delivered;
( 8 ) Conducting analyses of the suppliers of an affected company to assess their risks and vulnerabilities from a potential closing or shift in production of their major customer;
( 9 ) Engaging in proactive measures to identify opportunities for potential economic transition and training needs in growing industry sectors or expanding businesses; and
( 10 ) Connecting businesses and workers to short-term, on-the-job, or customized training programs and registered apprenticeships before or after layoff to help facilitate rapid reemployment.
#### Kathryn F. Crespi, Appellant, v. Albert V. Crespi, Respondent.

No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                     258,958,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         402,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           263,932,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             7,434,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                469,532,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     665,963,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       669,718,000
<LOANS>                                  1,497,147,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 20,272,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,832,082,000
<DEPOSITS>                               2,352,005,000
<SHORT-TERM>                               161,236,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         35,572,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        96,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 283,173,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           2,832,082,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             32,292,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           12,292,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             2,733,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            47,317,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          19,926,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          22,529,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       24,788,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                2,300,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             942,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             28,406,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,181,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   7,863,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,863,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.27
<LOANS-NON>                                  8,356,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,031,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               840,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            19,779,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                2,056,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   249,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           20,272,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        20,272,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        


</TABLE>
### SUBCHAPTER II—WORLD BANK AIDS TRUST FUND
#### In the Matter of Whitmel H. Smith, an Attorney.

Motion granted. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
### §2729. State Department records of overseas deaths of United States citizens from nonnatural causes

#### (a) Collection of information

The Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable, collect, with respect to each foreign country, the following information with respect to each United States citizen who dies in that country from a nonnatural cause on or after September 30, 2002:

(1) The date of death.

(2) The locality where the death occurred (including the state or province and municipality, if available).

(3) The cause of death, including information on the circumstances of the death, and including, if the death resulted from an act of terrorism, a statement disclosing that information.

(4) Such other information as the Secretary shall prescribe.

#### (b) Database

The Secretary shall establish and maintain a database containing the information collected under subsection (a).

#### (c) Public availability of information

Beginning three months after September 30, 2002, the Secretary, shall make available, on a country-by-country basis, on the Internet website of the Department's Bureau of Consular Affairs, the information from the database described in subsection (b) with respect to deaths occurring since September 30, 2002, or occurring during the preceding three calendar years, whichever period is shorter. The information shall be updated at least every six months.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §57, as added Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title II, §204, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1363.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,024

 2,086

 2,205

 2,387

 2,464

 2,608

 2,850

 2,932

 2,703

 3,399

 3,352

 3,035

 2,374

 2,081

 1,733

 1,788

 2,069

 1,754

 2,270

 2,560

 2,843

 0

 2,227

 3,074

 3,128

 2,556

 1,722

 1,852

 1,970

 2,082

 1,702

 214

 193

 214

 218

 217

 210

 209

 201

 200

 216

 229

 223

 218

 212

 204

 195

 199

 211

 212

 212

 213

 0

 217

 228

 238

 234

 204

 205

 217

 229

 240

 596

 519

 579

 673

 738

 788

 835

 863

 891

 1,075

 1,084

 999

 857

 786

 678

 530

 509

 520

 622

 741

 836

 0

 642

 977

 989

 896

 613

 608

 594

 555

 510

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 725.477 Form and contents of decision and order. ( a ) Orders adjudicating claims for benefits shall be designated by the term “decision and order” or “supplemental decision and order” as appropriate, followed by a descriptive phrase designating the particular type of order, such as “award of benefits,” “rejection of claim,” “suspension of benefits,” “modification of award.”
( b ) A decision and order shall contain a statement of the basis of the order, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and an award, rejection or other appropriate paragraph containing the action of the administrative law judge, his or her signature and the date of issuance. A decision and order shall be based upon the record made before the administrative law judge.
[65 FR 80054, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 72 FR 4205, Jan. 30, 2007]
§ 683.700 When can the Secretary impose sanctions and corrective actions on recipients and subrecipients of title I Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act funds? ( a ) *Applicability.* ( 1 ) Except for actions under WIOA secs. 116 and 188(a) or 29 CFR parts 31, 32, 35, and 38 and 49 CFR part 25, the Grant Officer must use the procedures outlined in § 683.440 before imposing a sanction on, or requiring corrective action by, recipients of funds under title I of WIOA.
( 2 ) To impose a sanction or corrective action for a violation of WIOA sec. 188(a) the Department will use the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 38.
( 3 ) To impose a sanction or corrective action for a violation of WIOA sec. 116 the Department will use the procedures set forth in part 677 of this chapter.
( b ) *States.* When a Grant Officer determines that the Governor has not fulfilled its requirements under 2 CFR part 200, an audit, or a monitoring compliance review set forth at sec. 184(a)(4) of WIOA and § 683.410, or has not taken corrective action to remedy a violation as required by WIOA secs. 184(a)(5) and 184(b)(1), the Grant Officer must require the Governor to impose the necessary corrective actions set forth at WIOA secs. 184(a)(5) and 184(b)(1), or may require repayment of funds under WIOA sec. 184(c). If the Secretary determines it is necessary to protect the funds or ensure the proper operation of a program or activity, the Secretary may immediately suspend or terminate financial assistance in accordance with WIOA sec. 184(e).
( c ) *Local areas.* If the Governor fails to promptly take the actions specified in WIOA sec. 184(b)(1) when it determines that a local area has failed to comply with the requirements described in § 683.720(a), and that the local area has not taken the necessary corrective action, the Grant Officer may impose such actions directly against the local area.
( d ) *Direct grant recipients.* When the Grant Officer determines that a direct grant recipient of subtitle D of title I of WIOA has not taken corrective action to remedy a substantial violation as the result of noncompliance with 2 CFR part 200, the Grant Officer may impose sanctions against the grant recipient.
( e ) *Subrecipients.* The Grant Officer may impose a sanction directly against a subrecipient, as authorized in WIOA sec. 184(d)(3) and 2 CFR 200.338. In such a case, the Grant Officer will inform the direct grant recipient of the action.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 165

 162

 164

 163

 165

 164

 163

 168

 165

 163

 160

 153

 149

 143

 140

 139

 138

 140

 147

 145

 150

 155

 170

 175

 182

 188

 197

 197

 197

 209

 146

 146

 148

 149

 149

 144

 138

 125

 117

 112

 116

 115

 116

 115

 117

 121

 124

 118

 119

 121

 124

 124

 132

 142

 144

 150

 148

 164

 163

 153

 155

 155

 157

 157

 157

 155

 152

 149

 145

 140

 140

 139

 137

 136

 134

 134

 135

 134

 136

 138

 142

 145

 153

 162

 167

 174

 181

 186

 188

 198

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER