alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 709.33

 709.56

 709.94

 710.19

 710.44

 710.67

 710.87

 711.04

 711.33

 711.85

 712.57

 713.03

 713.36

 713.56

 713.84

 714.02

 714.21

 714.39

 714.53

 714.70

 714.85

 714.98

 715.08

 715.32

 715.51

 715.70

 716.02

 716.20

 716.36

 716.50

 842

 849

 859

 867

 874

 881

 887

 892

 901

 917

 938

 952

 963

 969

 978

 984

 990

 995

 1,000

 1,005

 1,010

 1,014

 1,018

 1,026

 1,032

 1,038

 1,049

 1,055

 1,060

 1,065

STORAGE

+11

+7

+10

+8

+7

+7

+6

+5

+9

+16

+21

+14

+11

+6

+9

+6

+6

+5

+5

+5

+5

+4

+4

+8

+6

+6

+11

+6

+5

+5

CHANGE

7

5

6

5

4

4

4

3

5

8

11

7

6

3

5

4

4

3

3

3

3

2

2

4

3

3

6

3

4

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0950

 0940

 0935

 0920

 1005

TIME

 .31

 .28

 .28

 .28

 .27

COPPER

 1.14

 1.00

 .99

 .99

 .97

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 2, 2004

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +234 133 0 8

ACRE-FEET +234 264 0 16

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 16

 16

 831

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

Table 7
§ 725.548 Procedures applicable to overpayments and underpayments. ( a ) In any case involving either overpayments or underpayments, the Office may take any necessary action, and district directors may issue appropriate orders to protect the rights of the parties.
( b ) Disputes arising out of orders so issued shall be resolved by the procedures set out in subpart F of this part.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                             ----------------------

                                    FORM 6-K

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934


                           For the month of: May 2005
                                             --------


                               Given Imaging Ltd.
                               ------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


                   13 Ha'Yetzira Street, Yoqneam 20692, Israel
                   -------------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                         Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                    ---                       ---


     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes                       No   X
                                ---                      ---

<PAGE>
                                EXPLANATORY NOTE


     On May 2, 2005, Given Imaging Ltd. (the "Company") issued a press release
entitled "Given Imaging Announces First Quarter 2005 Results." Copies of the
press release and the Company's unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements as of March 31, 2005 are attached to this Form 6-K as Exhibit 1 and
Exhibit 2, respectively.

                                       2
<PAGE>
                                    SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                        GIVEN IMAGING LTD.


Date:  May 2, 2005                      By:  /s/ Zvi Ben David
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Name:  Zvi Ben David
                                           Title: Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

                                       3
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit        Description
-------        -----------

1.             Press Release dated May 2, 2005, entitled "Given Imaging
               Announces First Quarter 2005 Results."

2.             Unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Given
               Imaging Ltd. as of March 31, 2005.
#### § 686.720 Who provides career transition services?

The one-stop delivery system must be used to the maximum extent practicable in placing graduates and former enrollees in jobs. Multiple other resources also may provide post-program services, including but not limited to Job Corps career transition service providers under a contract or other agreement with the Department of Labor, and State vocational rehabilitation agencies for individuals with disabilities.
### SUBCHAPTER III—HEALTH FACILITIES
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

February-06

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily 

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In C

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Feb-06 0000 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51 2,633 2-Feb-06 0 0 12 0 12 0 12 78 0 0 8 0 8 0 8 51 4,270 

3-Feb-06 6000 6 0 18 78 4 0 0 0 4 0 12 51 3,963 4-Feb-06 0000 0 0 18 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 51 3,991 5-Feb-06 6000 6 0 24 78 4 0 0 0 4 0 16 51 4,649 6-Feb-06 0000 0 0 24 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 51 4,247 7-Feb-06 0000 0 0 24 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 51 3,098 8-Feb-06 0 0 12 0 12 0 36 78 0 0 8 0 8 0 24 51 4,213 

9-Feb-06 0000 0 0 36 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 51 4,213 

10-Feb-06 0 0 0 12 0 12 36 90 0 0 0 8 0 8 24 59 4,676 

11-Feb-06 0000 0 0 36 90 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 59 4,675 

12-Feb-06 6600 6 6 42 96 4 4 0 0 4 4 28 63 4,741 

13-Feb-06 0 0 12 0 12 0 54 96 0 0 8 0 8 0 36 63 3,983 

14-Feb-06 0 0 12 0 12 0 66 96 0 0 8 0 8 0 44 63 4,517 

15-Feb-06 0000 0 0 66 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 63 5,367 16-Feb-06 0000 0 0 66 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 63 7,206 17-Feb-06 0000 0 0 66 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 63 6,002 18-Feb-06 12 6 0 0 12 6 78 102 8 4 0 0 8 4 51 67 5,986 

19-Feb-06 12 9 0 12 12 21 90 123 8 6 0 8 8 14 59 81 5,986 

20-Feb-06 6 0 0 12 6 12 96 135 4 0 0 8 4 8 63 89 5,982 

21-Feb-06 12 6 0 0 12 6 108 141 8 4 0 0 8 4 71 93 6,029 

22-Feb-06 3 0 12 0 15 0 123 141 2 0 8 0 10 0 81 93 6,373 

23-Feb-06 6 12 12 0 18 12 141 153 4 8 8 0 12 8 93 101 5,525 

24-Feb-06 12 15 48 0 60 15 201 168 8 10 32 0 40 10 133 111 6,034 

25-Feb-06 6300 6 3 207 171 4 2 0 0 4 2 137 113 6,029 26-Feb-06 6300 6 3 213 174 4 2 0 0 4 2 141 115 5,797 27-Feb-06 24 21 36 24 60 45 273 219 16 14 24 16 40 30 180 145 3,922 28-Feb-06 0 0 84 24 84 24 357 243 0 0 55 16 55 16 236 160 1,213 

Total 117 81 240 84 357 165 357 243 77 53 158 55 236 109 236 160 135,318 12

Banks Tr
#### In the Matter of Sloppy Joe’s, Inc., Appellant. Broadway & 47th Street Corporation, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of WestCoast Golf Experiences, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger
Arnet, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
16th day of July, 2007.


/s/ Roger Arnet
---------------------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1










Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-167276 and File No. 333-171728) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-172922 and  File No. 333-165801) of Shengkai Innovations, Inc., of our report dated September 28, 2010  relating to the consolidated financial statements of Shengkai Innovations, Inc. as of June 30, 2010 and for the year then ended, which report appears in this annual report of Shengkai Innovations, Inc. on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended June 30, 2011.









/s/ BDO China Li Xin Da Hua CPA Co., Ltd.




BDO China Li Xin Da Hua CPA Co., Ltd.




Shenzhen, China




September 26, 2011
§ 718.103 Pulmonary function tests. ( a ) Any report of pulmonary function tests submitted in connection with a claim for benefits shall record the results of flow versus volume (flow-volume loop). The instrument shall simultaneously provide records of volume versus time (spirometric tracing). The report shall provide the results of the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and the forced vital capacity (FVC). The report shall also provide the FEV1/FVC ratio, expressed as a percentage. If the maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) is reported, the results of such test shall be obtained independently rather than calculated from the results of the FEV1.
( b ) All pulmonary function test results submitted in connection with a claim for benefits shall be accompanied by three tracings of the flow versus volume and the electronically derived volume versus time tracings. If the MVV is reported, two tracings of the MVV whose values are within 10% of each other shall be sufficient. Pulmonary function test results developed in connection with a claim for benefits shall also include a statement signed by the physician or technician conducting the test setting forth the following: ( 1 ) Date and time of test;
( 2 ) Name, DOL claim number, age, height, and weight of claimant at the time of the test;
( 3 ) Name of technician;
( 4 ) Name and signature of physician supervising the test;
( 5 ) Claimant's ability to understand the instructions, ability to follow directions and degree of cooperation in performing the tests. If the claimant is unable to complete the test, the person executing the report shall set forth the reasons for such failure;
( 6 ) Paper speed of the instrument used;
( 7 ) Name of the instrument used;
( 8 ) Whether a bronchodilator was administered. If a bronchodilator is administered, the physician's report must detail values obtained both before and after administration of the bronchodilator and explain the significance of the results obtained; and
( 9 ) That the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section have been complied with.
( c ) Except as provided in this paragraph, no results of a pulmonary function study shall constitute evidence of the presence or absence of a respiratory or pulmonary impairment unless it is conducted and reported in accordance with the requirements of this section and Appendix B to this part. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, compliance with the requirements of Appendix B shall be presumed. In the case of a deceased miner, where no pulmonary function tests are in substantial compliance with paragraphs (a) and (b) and Appendix B, noncomplying tests may form the basis for a finding if, in the opinion of the adjudication officer, the tests demonstrate technically valid results obtained with good cooperation of the miner.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUTM TCL2 Software RequirementsThe Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) Technical Capability Level (TCL) 2 software implements the UTM TCL 2 software requirements described herein. These software requirements are linked to the higher level UTM TCL 2 System Requirements. Each successive TCL implements additional UTM functionality, enabling additional use cases. TCL 2 demonstrated how to enable expanded multiple operations by implementing automation for beyond visual line-of-sight, tracking operations, and operations flying over sparsely populated areas.Document ID20170006027Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSmith, Irene S.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Rios, Joseph L.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*McGuirk, Patrick O.*(Millennium Engineering and Integration Co. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Mulfinger, Daniel G.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA United States)*Venkatesan, Priya*(ASRC Research and Technology Solutions, LLC Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Smith, David R.*(SGT, Inc. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Baskaran, Vijayakumar*(SGT, Inc. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Wang, Leo*(SGT, Inc. Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredJuly 3, 2017Publication DateApril 1, 2017Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219513ARC-E-DAA-TN42360Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNA13AB88CCONTRACT_GRANT: NNA14AA60CCONTRACT_GRANT: NNA13AC87CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170006027.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 726.313 Decision and order of Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The Administrative Law Judge shall render a decision on the issues referred by the Director.
( b ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall be limited to determining, where such issues are properly before him or her: ( 1 ) Whether the operator has violated section 423 of the Act and § 726.4;
( 2 ) Whether other persons identified by the Director as potentially severally liable for the penalty were the president, treasurer, or secretary of the corporation during the time period in question; and
( 3 ) The appropriateness of the penalty assessed by the Director in light of the factors set forth in § 726.302. The Administrative Law Judge shall not render determinations on the legality of a regulatory provision or the constitutionality of a statutory provision.
( c ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall include a statement of findings and conclusions, with reasons and bases therefor, upon each material issue presented on the record. The decision shall also include an appropriate order which may affirm, reverse, or modify, in whole or in part, the determination of the Director.
( d ) The Administrative Law Judge shall serve copies of the decision on each of the parties by certified mail.
( e ) The decision of the Administrative Law Judge shall be deemed to have been issued on the date that it is rendered, and shall constitute the final order of the Secretary unless there is a request for reconsideration by the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to paragraph (f) of this section or a petition for review filed pursuant to § 726.314.
( f ) Any party may request that the Administrative Law Judge reconsider his or her decision by filing a motion within 30 days of the date upon which the decision of the Administrative Law Judge is issued. A timely motion for reconsideration shall suspend the running of the time for any party to file a petition for review pursuant to § 726.314.
( g ) Following issuance of the decision and order, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall promptly forward the complete hearing record to the Director.
#### § 681.470 Does the Department require local programs to use Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act funds for each of the 14 program elements?

No. The Department does not require local programs to use WIOA youth funds for each of the program elements. Local programs may leverage partner resources to provide some of the readily available program elements. However, the local area must ensure that if a program element is not funded with WIOA title I youth funds, the local program has an agreement in place with a partner organization to ensure that the program element will be offered. The Local WDB must ensure that the program element is closely connected and coordinated with the WIOA youth program.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10(a)


                             AMENDED AND RESTATED
       FORMULA STOCK OPTION PLAN FOR NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF ALLIANCE
                             PHARMACEUTICAL CORP.


            AS APPROVED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS ON NOVEMBER 16, 1995

     Each person who is a nonemployee director of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp.
(the "Corporation") shall (i) upon his or her initial election to the Board of
Directors of the Corporation be granted an option for 25,000 shares of common
stock, $.01 par value, of the Corporation ("Common Stock"), which shall be
exercisable in four annual installments of 6,250 shares each with the first
installment being at his or her initial election and the remaining installments
becoming exercisable on the date of each annual meeting of the Corporation
("Annual Meeting"), thereafter that such person is a director, until fully
exercisable, and (ii) upon the third Annual Meeting following his or her initial
election and at each Annual Meeting thereafter that such person remains a
nonemployee director, automatically be granted an option to acquire 7,500 shares
of Common Stock. Except as otherwise described above, all options are
immediately exercisable in full on the date of grant. Options granted to
nonemployee directors shall have a term of ten (10) years from the date of
issuance, are granted at exercise prices equal to the fair market value on the
date of grant, and shall be granted under and subject to the Corporation's 1991
Stock Option Plan ("1991 Plan"), except that any provision which is in the
discretion of the Plan Administrator under the 1991 Plan shall not apply to
options granted to nonemployee directors pursuant to this plan.

     This plan shall not be amended more than once every six months, other than
to comport with changes in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, or the rules thereunder.
September 2022

STORAGE 1000 ACREFEET COMPUTED*

RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION

PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. OUTLET SPILL C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

1 788.31 6.81 -0.03 1 10 0 5 0.40 0.00

2 788.24 6.79 -0.03 1 10 0 5 0.44 0.00

3 788.15 6.75 -0.04 -2 10 0 6 0.52 0.00

4 788.07 6.72 -0.03 0 10 0 5 0.40 0.00

5 788.00 6.69 -0.03 1 10 0 5 0.43 0.00

6 787.94 6.67 -0.02 4 10 0 6 0.45 0.00

7 787.87 6.64 -0.03 3 10 0 6 0.49 0.00

8 787.80 6.62 -0.03 1 10 0 5 0.45 0.00

9 787.74 6.60 -0.02 5 10 0 6 0.51 0.00

10 787.66 6.56 -0.03 0 10 0 6 0.47 0.00

11 787.57 6.53 -0.03 -3 10 0 4 0.33 0.00

12 787.50 6.50 -0.03 -1 10 0 3 0.22 0.00

13 787.43 6.48 -0.03 2 10 0 5 0.39 0.00

14 787.36 6.45 -0.03 1 10 0 4 0.30 0.00

15 787.29 6.43 -0.03 0 10 0 3 0.23 0.00

16 787.21 6.40 -0.03 -2 10 0 3 0.23 0.00

17 787.14 6.37 -0.03 1 10 0 4 0.31 0.00

18 787.06 6.34 -0.03 -2 10 0 3 0.24 0.25

19 787.12 6.36 0.02 21 10 0 0 0.00 1.35

20 787.75 6.60 0.24 130 10 0 2 0.14 0.53

21 788.07 6.72 0.12 73 10 0 1 0.11 0.00

22 788.33 6.82 0.10 61 10 0 1 0.06 0.38

23 788.50 6.89 0.07 45 10 0 2 0.15 0.00

24 788.63 6.94 0.05 38 10 0 2 0.15 0.00

25 788.50 6.89 -0.05 -14 10 0 2 0.19 0.00

26 788.79 7.00 0.11 69 10 0 2 0.16 0.00

27 788.84 7.02 0.02 23 10 0 3 0.20 0.00

28 788.89 7.04 0.02 22 10 0 2 0.16 0.00

29 788.92 7.05 0.01 18 10 0 2 0.15 0.00

30 788.95 7.06 0.01 18 10 0 2 0.19 0.00

TOTALS 0.18 514 300 0 105 8.47 2.51

ACRE-FEET 180 1,020 595 0 208

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

SUMMARY

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Outlet 595

Spill 0

Total 595

Precipitation

This month 2.51

October 1, 2021 14.39

July 1, 2022 2.56

Historical Archive and Report Database

Stony Gorge Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 10/3/2022
#### § 668.270 What appeal rights are available to entities that are denied designation?

Any entity that is denied designation in whole or in part for the area or population that it requested may appeal the denial to the Office of the Administrative Law Judges using the procedures at 20 CFR 667.800 or the alternative dispute resolution procedures at 20 CFR 667.840. The Grant Officer will provide an entity whose request for designation was denied, in whole or in part, with a copy of the appeal procedures.
§ 725.204 Determination of relationship; spouse. ( a ) For the purpose of augmenting benefits, an individual will be considered to be the spouse of a miner if: ( 1 ) The courts of the State in which the miner is domiciled would find that such individual and the miner validly married; or
( 2 ) The courts of the State in which the miner is domiciled would find, under the law they would apply in determining the devolution of the miner's intestate personal property, that the individual is the miner's spouse; or
( 3 ) Under State law, such individual would have the right of a spouse to share in the miner's intestate personal property; or
( 4 ) Such individual went through a marriage ceremony with the miner resulting in a purported marriage between them and which, but for a legal impediment, would have been a valid marriage, unless the individual entered into the purported marriage with knowledge that it was not a valid marriage, or if such individual and the miner were not living in the same household in the month in which a request is filed that the miner's benefits be augmented because such individual qualifies as the miner's spouse.
( b ) The qualification of an individual for augmentation purposes under this section shall end with the month before the month in which: ( 1 ) The individual dies, or
( 2 ) The individual who previously qualified as a spouse for purposes of § 725.520(c), entered into a valid marriage without regard to this section, with a person other than the miner.