alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57342]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21452]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1544-DR]


Virginia; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and 
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-1544-DR), dated September 3, 
2004, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  September 19, 2004.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Virginia is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President 
in his declaration of September 3, 2004:

    King William and New Kent Counties for Public Assistance.
    King William, New Kent, and Charles City Counties for Individual 
Assistance.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, 
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management 
Assistance; 97.048, Individual and Household Housing; 97.049, 
Individual and Household Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 
Individual and Household Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public 
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program)

Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of 
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 04-21452 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
### §302. Change of name as affecting various rights; records, maps, and public documents

The change in the name of said hospital shall in no wise affect the rights of the Federal Government, or any municipality, corporation, association, or person; and all records, maps, and public documents of the United States in which said hospital is mentioned or referred to under the name of the Ancon Hospital or otherwise shall be held to refer to the said hospital under and by the name of the Gorgas Hospital.

(Mar. 24, 1928, ch. 240, §2, 45 Stat. 366.)
§ 702.414 Fees for medical services; unresolved disputes on prevailing charges. ( a ) The Director may, upon written complaint of an interested party, or upon the Director's own initiative, investigate any medical care provider or any fee for medical treatment, services, or supplies that appears to exceed prevailing community charges for similar treatment, services or supplies or the provider's customary charges. The OWCP medical fee schedule (see section 702.413) shall be used by the Director, where appropriate, to determine the prevailing community charges for a medical procedure by a physician or hospital (to the extent such procedure is covered by the OWCP fee schedule). The Director's investigation may initially be conducted informally through contact of the medical care provider by the district director. If this informal investigation is unsuccessful further proceedings may be undertaken. These proceedings may include, but not be limited to: an informal conference involving all interested parties; agency interrogatories to the pertinent medical care provider; and issuance of subpoenas duces tecum for documents having a bearing on the dispute. ( 1 ) A claim by the provider that the OWCP fee schedule does not represent the prevailing community rate will be considered only where the following circumstances are presented: ( i ) where the actual procedure performed was incorrectly identified by medical procedure code;
( ii ) that the presence of a severe or concomitant medical condition made treatment especially difficult;
( iii ) the provider possessed unusual qualifications (board certification in a specialty is not sufficient evidence in itself of unusual qualifications); or
( iv ) the provider or service is not one covered by the OWCP fee schedule as described by 20 CFR 10.805 *through 10.810.*
( 2 ) The circumstances listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section are the only ones which will justify reevaluation of the amount calculated under the OWCP fee schedule.
( b ) The failure of any medical care provider to present any evidence required by the Director pursuant to this section without good cause shall not prevent the Director from making findings of fact.
( c ) After any proceeding under this section the Director shall make specific findings on whether the fee exceeded the prevailing community charges (as established by the OWCP fee schedule, where appropriate) or the provider's customary charges and provide notice of these findings to the affected parties.
( d ) The Director may suspend any such proceedings if after receipt of the written complaint the affected parties agree to withdraw the controversy from agency consideration on the basis that such controversy has been resolved by the affected parties. Such suspension, however, shall be at the discretion of the Director.
[51 FR 4286, Feb. 3, 1986, as amended at 60 FR 51348, Oct. 2, 1995; 77 FR 37286, June 21, 2012]
### §6745. Recordkeeping violations

It shall be unlawful for any person willfully to fail or refuse—

(1) to establish or maintain any record required by this chapter or any regulation prescribed under this chapter;

(2) to submit any report, notice, or other information to the United States Government in accordance with this chapter or any regulation prescribed under this chapter; or

(3) to permit access to or copying of any record that is exempt from disclosure under this chapter or any regulation prescribed under this chapter.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. I, title IV, §405, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–883.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" and was translated as reading "this division", meaning div. I of Pub. L. 105–277, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–856, known as the Chemical Weapons Convention Implementation Act of 1998, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. For complete classification of division I to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6701 of this title and Tables.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Kevin E. Benson

Name: Kevin E. Benson
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Jeffrey W. Sanders

Name: Jeffrey W. Sanders
Title: Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 17
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 17 appear at 68 FR 51376, Aug. 26, 2003.

§ 17.211 Reasonable accommodation. ( a ) A recipient shall make reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified handicapped applicant or employee unless the recipient can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of its program or activity.
( b ) Reasonable accommodation may include but is not limited to: ( 1 ) Making facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons, and
( 2 ) job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, the provision of readers or interpreters, and other similar actions. This list is neither all inclusive nor meant to suggest that employers must follow all the actions listed.
( c ) In determining pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section whether an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of a recipient's program or activity, factors to be considered include: ( 1 ) The overall size of the recipient's program or activity with respect to number of employees, number and type of facilities, and size of budget;
( 2 ) The type of the recipient's operations, including the composition and structure of the recipient's workforce; and
( 3 ) The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
( d ) A recipient may not deny any employment opportunity to a handicapped employee or applicant if the basis for denial is the need to make reasonable accommodation to the physical or mental limitations of the employee or applicant.
§ 668.296 How are WIA funds allocated to INA grantees? ( a ) Except for reserved funds described in paragraph (e) of this section and funds used for program purposes under § 668.294, all funds available for WIA section 166(d)(2)(A)(i) comprehensive workforce investment services program at the beginning of a Program Year will be allocated to Native American grantees for their designated geographic service areas.
( b ) Each INA grantee will receive the sum of the funds calculated under the following formula: ( 1 ) One-quarter of the funds available will be allocated on the basis of the number of unemployed Native American persons in the grantee's designated INA service area(s) compared to all such persons in all such areas in the United States.
( 2 ) Three-quarters of the funds available will be allocated on the basis of the number of Native American persons in poverty in the grantee's designated INA service area(s) as compared to all such persons in all such areas in the United States.
( 3 ) The data and definitions used to implement these formulas is provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
( c ) In years immediately following the use of new data in the formula described in paragraph (b) of this section, based upon criteria to be described in the SGA, we may utilize a hold harmless factor to reduce the disruption in grantee services which would otherwise result from changes in funding levels. This factor will be determined in consultation with the grantee community and the Native American Employment and Training Council.
( d ) We may reallocate funds from one INA grantee to another if a grantee is unable to serve its area for any reason, such as audit or debt problems, criminal activity, internal (political) strife, or lack of ability or interest. Funds may also be reallocated if a grantee has carry-in excess of 20 percent of the total funds available to it. Carry-in amounts greater than 20 percent but less than 25 percent of total funds available may be allowed under an approved waiver issued by DINAP.
( e ) We may reserve up to one percent (1 percent) of the funds appropriated under WIA section 166(d)(2)(A)(i) for any Program Year for TAT purposes. Technical assistance will be provided in consultation with the Native American Employment and Training Council.
### §2349b. Waiver authorities

#### (a) Efficient and timely completion of authorized construction

It is the sense of the Congress that the President should take all necessary measures consistent with law to insure the efficient and timely completion of the construction authorized by this part, including the exercise of authority vested in him by section 2393(a) of this title.

#### (b) Use of funds to pay for personal services abroad

The provisions of paragraph (3) of section 2396(a) of this title shall be applicable to the use of funds available to carry out this part, except that no more than sixty persons may be engaged at any one time under that paragraph for purposes of this part.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §563, as added Pub. L. 96–35, §3, July 20, 1979, 93 Stat. 90.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Detail

# International Trade and Deforestation: Potential Policy Effects via a Global Economic Model

Economic Research Report No. (ERR-229) 71 pp, April 2017

by Jayson  Beckman, Ron  Sands, Anne  Riddle, Tani  Lee, and Jacob M. Walloga

Increasing global population and demand for food have placed rising pressures on tropical forests as agricultural land expands at their expense. ERS researchers employ a global economic model to assess the effects of two potential policies—(1) removing tariffs on forest-risk products and (2) prohibiting export of illegally logged wood—that could affect tropical forest loss.

**Keywords:** Deforestation, forest-risk products, palm oil, soybean, beef, wood products, Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia, Indonesia, Malaysia, tropical forest, selective logging

**In this publication...**

-  Entire Report 
-  Download Zip file ERR-229 
-  Report summary 

-  Cattle & Beef 
-  Crops 
-  Soybeans & Oil Crops 
-  International Markets & Trade 
-  Countries & Regions 
-  Trade Policy & World Trade Organization (WTO) 
-  U.S. Agricultural Trade 
-  Natural Resources & Environment 

-  Livestock and Meat International Trade Data 

**Last updated:** Thursday, April 27, 2017

**For more information contact:**Jayson  Beckman, Ron  Sands, Anne  Riddle, Tani  Lee, and Jacob M. Walloga
### §7812. Support for human rights and democracy programs

#### (a) Support

The President is authorized to provide grants to private, nonprofit organizations to support programs that promote human rights, democracy, rule of law, and the development of a market economy in North Korea. Such programs may include appropriate educational and cultural exchange programs with North Korean participants, to the extent not otherwise prohibited by law. The President is also authorized to provide grants to entities to undertake research on North Korea's denial of human rights, including on the political and military chains of command responsible for authorizing and implementing systemic human rights abuses, including at prison camps and detention facilities where political prisoners are held.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

There are authorized to be appropriated to the President $2,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2005 through 2008 and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2022 to carry out this section.

#### (2) Availability

Amounts appropriated pursuant to the authorization of appropriations under paragraph (1) are authorized to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 108–333, title I, §102, Oct. 18, 2004, 118 Stat. 1290; Pub. L. 110–346, §5, Oct. 7, 2008, 122 Stat. 3941; Pub. L. 112–172, §4, Aug. 16, 2012, 126 Stat. 1308; Pub. L. 115–198, §7(a), July 20, 2018, 132 Stat. 1523.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–198, §7(a)(1), inserted at end "The President is also authorized to provide grants to entities to undertake research on North Korea's denial of human rights, including on the political and military chains of command responsible for authorizing and implementing systemic human rights abuses, including at prison camps and detention facilities where political prisoners are held."

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 115–198, §7(a)(2), substituted "2022" for "2017".

2012—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 112–172 substituted "2017" for "2012".

2008—Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 110–346 inserted "and $2,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2009 through 2012" after "2008".
§ 10005.16 Plan content. ( a ) *Minimum requirements.* At a minimum, the plan will include: ( 1 ) A summary of basic information from the planning rule, including project evaluation procedures and plan amendment procedures,
( 2 ) The identification of measurable objectives for the term of the plan,
( 3 ) A list, and description, of the projects selected for implementation during the term of the plan—with particular emphasis on projects to be implemented early in the planning cycle,
( 4 ) A description of the relationship between the projects to be included in the plan and the Commission's mitigation obligations,
( 5 ) A preliminary determination regarding environmental review requirements for each project,
( 6 ) A preliminary determination of management and operation requirements and how these will be met,
( 7 ) A budget, both for the next fiscal year and for the entire five-year period,
( 8 ) A project phasing plan spanning the term of the plan, and
( 9 ) A strategy for monitoring progress and evaluating accomplishments, and
( b ) *Potential additions.* At the Commission's discretion, the plan may also include: ( 1 ) A discussion of the relationship of the plan to other activities affecting fish, wildlife, and recreation resources within the State of Utah, and/or
( 2 ) Discussions of, or information on, other topics that the Commission determines to be relevant. For example, the Commission may wish to identify mitigation and/or conservation measures that the Commission may wish to consider in later years of the five-year plan or in subsequent five-year plans.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 707.48

 707.46

 707.45

 707.47

 707.49

 707.51

 707.52

 707.51

 707.51

 707.55

 707.59

 707.63

 707.65

 707.64

 707.63

 707.61

 707.63

 707.70

 707.78

 707.82

 707.83

 707.84

 707.91

 708.00

 706.92

 707.09

 707.28

 707.49

 707.66

 707.78

 790

 790

 790

 790

 791

 791

 792

 791

 791

 792

 794

 795

 795

 795

 795

 794

 795

 797

 799

 800

 800

 801

 802

 805

 775

 780

 785

 791

 795

 799

STORAGE

-1

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+1

-1

+0

+1

+2

+1

+0

+0

+0

-1

+1

+2

+2

+1

+0

+1

+1

+3

-30

+5

+5

+6

+4

+4

CHANGE

0

1

1

1

2

1

2

0

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

0

2

2

1

1

1

2

2

2

-8

4

4

4

3

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 7

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0950

 1000

 0945

TIME

 .16

 .15

 .14

COPPER

 .63

 .62

 .63

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2008

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +8 41 0 33

ACRE-FEET +8 81 0 65

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 65

 65

 791

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .001
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 191

 172

 173

 180

 161

 167

 160

 144

 169

 159

 146

 153

 154

 160

 149

 162

 175

 167

 153

 155

 149

 154

 173

 157

 158

 164

 172

 184

 176

 175

 150

 148

 145

 142

 141

 146

 137

 128

 132

 130

 130

 136

 138

 137

 136

 136

 138

 135

 129

 128

 132

 139

 147

 146

 148

 156

 159

 157

 156

 157

 163

 159

 157

 157

 151

 156

 147

 135

 144

 142

 138

 142

 146

 143

 142

 145

 153

 150

 142

 143

 142

 149

 154

 152

 153

 159

 164

 165

 167

 167

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2013 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 25, 2013

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

STATEN ISLAND ON THE SOUTH FORK MOKELUMNE RIVER
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Probe Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:  The Amended Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Form 10-K/A") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  August 1, 2008   /s/  Reza Zarif ---------------------- Reza Zarif Chief  Executive  Officer Director   Date:  August 1, 2008   /s/  John Bennett ------------------------ John Bennett Chief  Financial  Officer
### SUBCHAPTER II—INDIAN TRUST FUND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4596 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

and Transportation 

AN ACT 

To ensure that small business providers of broadband Internet access service can devote resources to broadband 

deployment rather than compliance with cumbersome 

regulatory requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4596 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business 

3 Broadband Deployment Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO ENHANCEMENT TO TRANSPARENCY 

5 REQUIREMENTS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The enhancements to the trans7 parency rule of the Federal Communications Commission 

8 under section 8.3 of title 47, Code of Federal Regulations, 

9 as described in paragraphs 162 through 184 of the Report 

10 and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order of 

11 the Federal Communications Commission with regard to 

12 protecting and promoting the open Internet (adopted Feb13 ruary 26, 2015) (FCC 15–24), shall not apply to any 

14 small business. 

15 (b) SUNSET.—Subsection (a) shall not have any force 

16 or effect after the date that is 5 years after the date of 

17 the enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) REPORT BY FCC.—Not later than 180 days after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Federal Commu20 nications Commission shall submit to the Committee on 

21 Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives 

22 and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transpor23 tation of the Senate a report that contains the rec24 ommendations of the Commission (and data supporting 

25 such recommendations) regarding— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4596 RFS 

1 (1) whether the exception provided by sub2 section (a) should be made permanent; and 

3 (2) whether the definition of the term ‘‘small 

4 business’’ for purposes of such exception should be 

5 modified from the definition in subsection (d)(2). 

6 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) BROADBAND INTERNET ACCESS SERVICE.— 

8 The term ‘‘broadband Internet access service’’ has 

9 the meaning given such term in section 8.2 of title 

10 47, Code of Federal Regulations. 

11 (2) SMALL BUSINESS.—The term ‘‘small busi12 ness’’ means any provider of broadband Internet ac13 cess service that has not more than 250,000 sub14 scribers. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS