alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7860] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition “The Wealth of a Nation: British Silver from the Museum's Collection,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about May 15, 2012, until on or about October 28, 2012, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505. 

Dated: April 18, 2012. 

J. Adam Ereli, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2012-10251 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Subsidiaries, incorporated in the British Virgin Islands:
 
    
    Golden Carriage International Limited
    
    Century Port Limited
    
    Peak Win Limited
    
    Aim Sky International Limited
    
    Goldwhite Limited
    
    Ahead Smart Holdings Limited
 Subsidiaries, incorporated in the PRC:
 
    
    China Digital Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd.
    
    Shenzhen Huachangshi Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Beijing Eastlong Technology Development Co., Ltd.
    
    Dienzhi Advertising (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
 Subsidiary, incorporated in Hong Kong:
 
    
    Win Prosper Development Limited
    
    DNG (HK) Co., Ltd.
 Consolidated entities, each of which is incorporated in the PRC:
 
    
    Beijing Hua Jingshi Media Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    Beijing Beiguang Media Mobile Television Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    Beijing Hua Meishi Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    Beijing Huaguangshi Co., Ltd.
    
    VisionChina Media Group Limited
    
    Nanjing Hua Meishi Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    Nanjing Media Culture Co., Ltd.
    
    Shenzhen HDTV Industrial Investment Co., Ltd.




---



##### 




    
    Shenzhen Hua Meishi Advertising Co., Ltd.
    
    Shenzhen Huashixin Culture Media Co., Ltd.
    
    Guangzhou Jiaojian Multimedia Information Technology Co. Ltd.
    
    Luzhou Huashi Digital Technology Co., Ltd.
    
    Beijing Eastlong Advertising Co., Ltd
    
    Chongqing Light Rail Information Service Co., Ltd.
    
    Nanjing Metro Operation Information Service Co., Ltd.
    
    Shenzhen Metro Operation Information Service Co., Ltd.
    
    Tianjin Metro Operation Information Service Co., Ltd.
    
    Dienzhi Advertising (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       7,367,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,538,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (137,113)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,856,833
<PP&E>                                      16,685,734
<DEPRECIATION>                             (4,676,356)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,244,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,049,683
<BONDS>                                     49,140,742
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       18,699,207
<PREFERRED>                                  3,000,000
<COMMON>                                        26,627
<OTHER-SE>                                (52,671,871)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,244,388
<SALES>                                          4,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,670,614
<CGS>                                            1,526
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,359,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               125,099
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,137,607
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,283,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,283,349)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,283,349)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (8.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.76)


</TABLE>
§ 685.370 What services may grantees provide to eligible migrant and seasonal farmworkers youth participants aged 14-24? ( a ) Based on an evaluation and assessment of the needs of eligible MSFW youth, grantees may provide activities and services that include but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Career services and training as described in §§ 685.340 and 685.350;
( 2 ) Youth workforce investment activities specified in WIOA sec. 129;
( 3 ) Life skills activities which may include self- and interpersonal skills development;
( 4 ) Community service projects; and
( 5 ) Other activities and services that conform to the use of funds for youth activities described in part 681 of this chapter.
( b ) Grantees may provide these services to any eligible MSFW youth, regardless of the participant's eligibility for WIOA title I youth activities as described in WIOA sec. 129(a).
### §1185. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 90–508, §5, Sept. 21, 1968, 82 Stat. 862, which exempted funds distributed under the provisions of this subchapter from Federal and State income taxes, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
#### § 686.640 Are students provided with clothing?

Yes, Job Corps students are provided cash clothing allowances and/or articles of clothing, including safety clothing, when needed for their participation in Job Corps and their successful entry into the work force. Center operators and other service providers must issue clothing and clothing assistance to students according to rates, criteria, and procedures issued by the Secretary.
#### Louise Guilden, Respondent, v. Ira Guilden, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 828.76

 828.75

 828.78

 828.79

 828.81

 828.82

 828.84

 828.86

 828.88

 828.88

 828.88

 828.85

 828.80

 828.74

 828.70

 828.69

 828.71

 828.72

 828.71

 828.70

 828.68

 828.66

 828.61

 828.55

 828.51

 828.54

 828.55

 828.58

 828.67

 828.76

 828.90

 35.86

 35.85

 35.88

 35.89

 35.91

 35.92

 35.94

 35.96

 35.99

 35.99

 35.99

 35.95

 35.90

 35.84

 35.79

 35.78

 35.80

 35.81

 35.80

 35.79

 35.77

 35.75

 35.70

 35.63

 35.59

 35.60

 35.63

 35.66

 35.76

 35.86

 36.01

STORAGE

-0.02

-0.01

+0.03

+0.01

+0.02

+0.01

+0.02

+0.02

+0.02

+0.00

+0.00

-0.03

-0.05

-0.07

-0.04

-0.01

+0.02

+0.01

-0.01

-0.01

-0.02

-0.02

-0.05

-0.06

-0.04

+0.01

+0.03

+0.03

+0.10

+0.10

+0.15

CHANGE

23

28

47

33

41

38

42

43

43

30

27

13

3

-2

7

23

40

34

24

23

18

18

2

-3

5

34

44

43

75

77

105

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 15

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

SPILL

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 16

 14

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

OUTLET

 8

 7

 5

 1

 4

 6

 5

 6

 6

 6

 6

 4

 4

 5

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 1

 1

 3

 1

 0

 3

 3

C.F.S.

 .23

 .19

 .14

 .02

 .12

 .17

 .15

 .16

 .17

 .17

 .16

 .13

 .12

 .15

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .08

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .03

 .03

 .08

 .03

 .01

 .08

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .19

 .32

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .22

 .04

 .16

 .09

 .01

 .13

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2016 RUN DATE: 01/10/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +.14 978 284 515 115 3.31 1.56

ACRE-FEET +140 1,940 563 1,022 228

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 1,022

OUTLET

TOTAL

 563

 1,585

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.56

JULY 1, 2016 1.56

 35.88

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 1.56
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION

I, Alexander Shen, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed
this Amendment No.1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of TechPrecision Corporation for the year ended March 31, 2018; and



2.    Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



|Dated: July 27, 2018 | /s/ Alexander Shen     
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Alexander Shen         
|                     | Chief Executive Officer
#### § 702.103 Effect of establishment of suboffices and jurisdictional areas.

Whenever the Director establishes a suboffice or jurisdictional area, those reports, records, or other documents with respect to processing of claims that are required to be filed with the district director of the compensation district in which the injury or death occurred, may instead be required to be filed with the suboffice, or office established for the jurisdictional area.

[80 FR 12928, Mar. 12, 2015
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.50 N 76.81 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
**[LETTERHEAD OF PENNSYLVANIA HIGHER EDUCATION ASSISTANCE AGENCY]**

Exhibit 99.1

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT FOR**

**THE NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-2**

 

September 23, 2005

The National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-2

c/o The Delaware Trust Company, National Association

300 Delaware Avenue, 9th Floor

Wilmington, DE 19801

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-2 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2005 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent as follows:

 
|   | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Alternative Servicing Agreement dated as of October 16, 2001, as amended, between the Servicer and The First Marblehead Corporation (the “Servicing Agreement”) for the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under the supervision of the undersigned; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 2. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report; and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | 3. | To the best knowledge of the undersigned, based on such review, there have been no failures to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7425

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILL ROGER JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(2:00-cr-00446-FBH; 2:03-cv-03861-DCN)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 21, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Will Roger Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Alston Calhoun Badger, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Will Roger Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jones has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 746.55

 746.73

 747.01

 747.17

 747.30

 747.55

 747.68

 747.80

 748.04

 748.14

 748.25

 748.46

 748.58

 748.71

 748.76

 748.90

 749.05

 749.11

 749.34

 749.75

 750.12

 750.31

 750.55

 750.67

 750.77

 750.98

 751.06

 751.18

 751.22

 751.21

 751.19

 2,370

 2,380

 2,396

 2,404

 2,412

 2,425

 2,432

 2,439

 2,452

 2,458

 2,464

 2,476

 2,483

 2,490

 2,493

 2,501

 2,510

 2,513

 2,527

 2,551

 2,572

 2,583

 2,597

 2,604

 2,610

 2,622

 2,627

 2,634

 2,636

 2,635

 2,634

STORAGE

+17

+10

+16

+8

+8

+13

+7

+7

+13

+6

+6

+12

+7

+7

+3

+8

+9

+3

+14

+24

+21

+11

+14

+7

+6

+12

+5

+7

+2

-1

-1

CHANGE

9

5

8

4

4

7

4

4

7

3

3

6

4

4

2

4

5

2

7

12

11

6

7

4

3

6

3

4

4

4

4

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 5

 5

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2002 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 18, 2002

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +281 160 0 13

ACRE-FEET +281 317 0 26

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 26

 26

 2,353

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 820.24

 818.87

 817.39

 815.89

 814.37

 812.83

 811.20

 809.54

 807.75

 805.91

 803.95

 801.92

 799.75

 797.38

 794.78

 792.78

 792.83

 793.03

 793.22

 793.43

 793.64

 793.85

 794.04

 794.21

 794.36

 794.50

 794.62

 794.58

 794.67

 794.72

 797.77

 27.35

 26.11

 24.81

 23.52

 22.27

 21.03

 19.78

 18.55

 17.27

 16.02

 14.72

 13.49

 12.22

 10.92

 9.61

 8.67

 8.69

 8.78

 8.87

 8.97

 9.06

 9.16

 9.25

 9.33

 9.40

 9.47

 9.53

 9.51

 9.55

 9.58

 11.13

STORAGE

-1.16

-1.24

-1.31

-1.28

-1.26

-1.23

-1.26

-1.23

-1.27

-1.26

-1.29

-1.24

-1.27

-1.30

-1.32

-0.94

+0.02

+0.09

+0.09

+0.10

+0.10

+0.10

+0.09

+0.08

+0.07

+0.07

+0.06

-0.02

+0.04

+0.03

+1.55

CHANGE

86

40

7

13

22

26

11

18

-10

-8

-34

-15

-37

-60

-79

-60

44

56

54

58

59

60

56

51

48

46

41

3

33

25

795

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 662

 659

 656

 652

 649

 643

 639

 632

 627

 619

 613

 605

 597

 589

 579

 407

 27

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

 6

OUTLET

 7

 8

 9

 7

 7

 4

 5

 6

 5

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 5

 4

 3

 4

 5

 5

 5

 6

 6

 6

 7

 5

 6

 7

C.F.S.

 .25

 .29

 .32

 .26

 .25

 .15

 .21

 .24

 .20

 .26

 .25

 .26

 .29

 .32

 .32

 .34

 .31

 .34

 .30

 .20

 .25

 .32

 .33

 .32

 .37

 .40

 .37

 .42

 .34

 .37

 .40

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .53

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2014 RUN DATE: 08/08/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -17.39 1,349 9,939 0 173 9.25 .78

ACRE-FEET -17,390 2,676 19,714 0 343

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 19,714

 19,714

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .78

JULY 1, 2013 10.98

 28.51

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
#### H. H. W. Construction Co., Inc., Respondent, *v.*H. Charles Daniels, Appellant.

First Department,

March 14, 1949.

*33
      *James C. Thomas*of counsel *(Herbert B. Codrington,*attorney), for appellant.

*Armende Lesser*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

After trial before the court without a jury, the trial court directed judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $1,750 as plaintiff’s loss of profit on an alteration contract plaintiff claims defendant made and breached.

Plaintiff, the contractor, drew the document in question in which there were blanks regarding both initial payments and payments as the work progressed. Plaintiff’s president testified that nothing was said about financing until the document had been *signed;*on rebuttal, however, in answer to the court’s inquiry, the same witness stated that the blanks were left in the contract *“*because I wanted to give him [defendant] a chance to raise the balance of the money for the job * * This vital admission tended to destroy plaintiff’s prior testimony and, considered with the uncontested fact that plaintiff did make efforts to secure financing for defendant, it also tended to support defendant’s testimony as to how the document came to be signed. Such testimony was properly admitted as the condition did not contradict the writing *(Saltzman*v. *Barson,*239 N. Y. 332, 337; Restatements, Contracts, § 241).

As to the claimed loss of profits, the trial court did not accept as true plaintiff’s testimony that the profit would have been $3,200, almost 40% of the total amount involved. But we find no basis in the record for the court’s finding of $1,750 as plaintiff’s loss of profit.

On the merits this judgment stands upon the inconsistent and contradictory testimony of plaintiff’s main witness and, while we are convinced the judgment in plaintiff’s favor should be reversed, we think we should not dismiss but should order a new trial.

The judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

Peck, P. J., Doee, Cohn, Van Vooehis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.