alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10445]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Correction of Revoked Customs Broker Licenses

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Reinstatement of Licenses.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
(19 U.S.C. 1641) and Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations at 
section 111.30(d), the following Customs broker licenses were 
inadvertently revoked without prejudice on November 18, 2011. See 
Notice of Revocation of Customs Broker License, dated November 18, 2011 
(76 FR 71584). The below identified licenses are active.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Name                    License         Port name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aldo Neyra, Jr.......................      17367  Los Angeles.
Samantha Woo.........................      17389  New York.
Gloria S. Oh.........................      04973  New York.
Kenneth Carlstedt....................      13049  New York.
Michael Bonvissuto...................      04793  New York.
John G. Duffield.....................      05829  New York.
Michael Russell......................      22702  New York.
Anthony J. Raffin....................      24103  Detroit.
Jeramy Caudill.......................      23068  St. Louis.
Susan K. Richards....................      10847  Philadelphia.
Catherine Finn.......................      12339  New Orleans.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: April 23, 2012.
Richard DiNucci,
Deputy Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
[FR Doc. 2012-10445 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
#### § 404.1060 [Reserved]
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Pamphlets of the Women's Bureau

              																			United States. Women's Bureau.				"Help for Handicapped Women, Pamphlet 5,"		*Pamphlets of the Women's Bureau*		(1958).				https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/266/item/5914, accessed on September 22, 2024.	    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
### SUBCHAPTER XLV—OMAHA TRIBE: DISTRIBUTION OF JUDGMENT FUND
### §7204. Termination of sanctions

Any unilateral agricultural sanction or unilateral medical sanction that is imposed pursuant to the procedures described in section 7202(a) of this title shall terminate not later than 2 years after the date on which the sanction became effective unless—

(1) not later than 60 days before the date of termination of the sanction, the President submits to Congress a report containing—

(A) the recommendation of the President for the continuation of the sanction for an additional period of not to exceed 2 years; and

(B) the request of the President for approval by Congress of the recommendation; and

(2) there is enacted into law a joint resolution stating the approval of Congress for the report submitted under paragraph (1).

(Pub. L. 106–387, §1(a) [title IX, §905], Oct. 28, 2000, 114 Stat. 1549, 1549A–69.)
§ 667.610 What processes do we use to review State and local grievances and complaints? ( a ) We investigate allegations arising through the grievance procedures described in § 667.600 when: ( 1 ) A decision on a grievance or complaint under § 667.600(d) has not been reached within 60 days of receipt of the grievance or complaint or within 60 days of receipt of the request for appeal of a local level grievance and either party appeals to the Secretary; or
( 2 ) A decision on a grievance or complaint under § 667.600(d) has been reached and the party to which such decision is adverse appeals to the Secretary.
( b ) We must make a final decision on an appeal under paragraph (a) of this section no later than 120 days after receiving the appeal.
( c ) Appeals made under paragraph (a)(2) of this section must be filed within 60 days of the receipt of the decision being appealed. Appeals made under paragraph (a)(1) of this section must be filed within 120 days of the filing of the grievance with the State, or the filing of the appeal of a local grievance with the State. All appeals must be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the appropriate ETA Regional Administrator and the opposing party.
( d ) Except for complaints arising under WIA section 184(f) or section 188, grievances or complaints made directly to the Secretary will be referred to the appropriate State or local area for resolution in accordance with this section, unless we notify the parties that the Department of Labor will investigate the grievance under the procedures at § 667.505. Discrimination complaints brought under WIA section 188 or 29 CFR part 37 will be referred to the Director of the Civil Rights Center.
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------





                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWALT, Inc.,
Alternative Loan Trust 2005-29CB;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


Date: March 27, 2006


                                        /s/ Steve Bailey
                                        ----------------
                                        Steve Bailey
                                        Senior Managing Director
#### § 901.71 Special orders.

The Joint Board reserves the power to issue such special orders as it may deem proper in any case within the purview of this part.
§ 663.720 What are the requirements for customized training for employed workers? Customized training of an eligible employed individual may be provided for an employer or a group of employers when: ( a ) The employee is not earning a self-sufficient wage as determined by Local Board policy;
( b ) The requirements in § 663.715 are met; and
( c ) The customized training relates to the purposes described in § 663.705(c) or other appropriate purposes identified by the Local Board.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

May 2013

Note: Shaded area not verified with CDFW data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 142 0 3 0 145 12 1,965 3,279 

2-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 33 2 44 2 77 14 2,042 1,123 

3-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 9 0 43 0 52 14 2,094 1,034 

4-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 60 0 8 0 68 14 2,162 1,654 

5-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,162 2,095 

6-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0003 0 3 14 2,165 596 

7-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0003 0 3 14 2,168 0 

8-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 0 0 10 0 10 14 2,178 0 

9-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0003 0 3 14 2,181 138 

10-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 53 0 0 0 53 14 2,234 1,101 

11-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 17 0 0 0 17 14 2,251 1,101 

12-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 34 0 0 0 34 14 2,285 1,101 

13-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 35 0 0 0 35 14 2,320 1,101 

14-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 17 0 0 0 17 14 2,337 1,015 

15-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 22 0 4 0 26 14 2,363 1,101 

16-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,363 930 

17-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0007 0 7 14 2,370 732 

18-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 21 0 0 0 21 14 2,391 732 

19-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 21 0 0 0 21 14 2,412 732 

20-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 63 0 0 0 63 14 2,475 732 

21-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,475 732 

22-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,475 696 

23-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,475 375 

24-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,475 375 

25-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0 21 0 0 0 21 14 2,496 696 

26-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 742 

27-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 742 

28-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 742 

29-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 742 

30-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 742 

31-May-13 0000 0 0 595 727 0000 0 0 14 2,496 742 

Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 595 727 0 548 2 128 2 676 14 2,496 27,624 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)

Preliminary

Banks T
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 129.94

 130.03

 129.94

 129.92

 129.26

 130.41

 130.43

 130.31

 130.31

 130.12

 129.98

 130.06

 130.18

 130.29

 130.32

 129.93

 129.56

 129.67

 129.82

 129.71

 129.77

 129.68

 129.62

 129.74

 129.75

 129.89

 129.96

 130.04

 130.07

 130.14

 130.33

 574

 584

 574

 572

 508

 624

 626

 613

 613

 593

 579

 587

 599

 611

 614

 573

 537

 548

 562

 552

 557

 549

 543

 555

 556

 569

 577

 585

 588

 595

 615

STORAGE

-7

+10

-10

-2

-64

+116

+2

-13

+0

-20

-14

+8

+12

+12

+3

-41

-36

+11

+14

-10

+5

-8

-6

+12

+1

+13

+8

+8

+3

+7

+20

CHANGE

97

120

118

132

99

168

86

86

85

70

73

84

86

86

77

62

67

91

86

70

71

61

62

71

66

83

84

84

82

82

87

INFLOW

 70

 85

 85

 85

 85

 68

 40

 40

 37

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 33

 32

PUTAH

 31

 30

 38

 48

 46

 42

 45

 53

 48

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 40

 48

 50

 50

 44

 40

 33

 30

 30

 30

 30

 41

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .03

 .00

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .06

 .08

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .00

 .04

 .09

 .06

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .75

 .03

 .04

 .00

 .42

 .00

 .04

 .31

 .00

 .52

 .65

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

DECEMBER 2008 RUN DATE: 01/05/2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +34 2,676 1,297 1,360 0 .90 2.76

ACRE-FEET +34 5,308 2,573 2,698 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,698

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,573

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.76

JULY 1, 2008 5.70

 581

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 714.16

 714.18

 714.19

 714.22

 714.26

 714.32

 714.40

 714.50

 714.54

 714.56

 714.58

 714.61

 714.63

 714.64

 714.68

 714.72

 714.72

 714.72

 714.72

 714.71

 714.69

 714.68

 714.68

 714.67

 714.66

 714.64

 714.71

 714.86

 714.68

 714.24

 713.81

 988

 989

 989

 990

 991

 993

 996

 999

 1,000

 1,001

 1,002

 1,003

 1,003

 1,003

 1,005

 1,006

 1,006

 1,006

 1,006

 1,006

 1,005

 1,005

 1,005

 1,004

 1,004

 1,003

 1,006

 1,011

 1,005

 991

 977

STORAGE

+1

+1

+0

+1

+1

+2

+3

+3

+1

+1

+1

+1

+0

+0

+2

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

-1

+0

+0

-1

+0

-1

+3

+5

-6

-14

-14

CHANGE

1

1

0

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

-1

0

0

-1

0

-1

2

3

-1

-2

-2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 5

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 5

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2001 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 20, 2001

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -10 12 5 7

ACRE-FEET -10 24 10 14

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 10

OUTLET

TOTAL

 14

 24

 987

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
[Letterhead of PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS]                  Exhibit 99.2c


                         Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors and Stockholder
of GMAC Mortgage Corporation:


We have examined management's assertion about GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP") as
of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying
management assertion (See Exhibit I). Management is responsible for the
Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's
compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was performed in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSE COOPERS LLP

March 21, 2006



[Letterhead of GMAC Mortgage]
                                                              Exhibit 1

                          Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                            with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 21, 2006


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects with
the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $350,000,000 and
$100,000,000, respectively.


/s/ Jim Hillsman
---------------------------
Chief Operating Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Dave Bricker
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Tony Renzi
---------------------------
Executive Vice President,
National Servicing Administration
GMAC Residential Holding Corp
§ 726.104 Action by the Office upon application of operator. ( a ) Upon receipt of a completed application for authorization to self-insure, the Office shall, after examination of the information contained in the application, either deny the request or determine the amount of security which must be given by the applicant to guarantee the payment of benefits and the discharge of all other obligations which may be required of such applicant under the Act.
( b ) The applicant shall thereafter be notified that he may give security in the amount fixed by the Office (see § 726.105): ( 1 ) In the form of an indemnity bond with sureties satisfactory to the Office;
( 2 ) By a deposit of negotiable securities with a Federal Reserve Bank in compliance with §§ 726.106(c) and 726.107;
( 3 ) In the form of a letter of credit issued by a financial institution satisfactory to the Office (except that a letter of credit shall not be sufficient by itself to satisfy a self-insurer's obligations under this part); or
( 4 ) By funding a trust pursuant to section 501(c)(21) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C.).
( c ) Any applicant who cannot meet the security deposit requirements imposed by the Office should proceed to obtain a commercial policy or contract of insurance. Any applicant for authorization to self-insure whose application has been rejected or who believes that the security deposit requirements imposed by the Office are excessive may, in writing, request that the Office review its determination. A request for review should contain such information as may be necessary to support the request that the amount of security required be reduced.
( d ) Upon receipt of any such request, the Office shall review its previous determination in light of any new or additional information submitted and inform the applicant whether or not a reduction in the amount of security initially required is warranted.
§ 718.105 Arterial blood-gas studies. ( a ) Blood-gas studies are performed to detect an impairment in the process of alveolar gas exchange. This defect will manifest itself primarily as a fall in arterial oxygen tension either at rest or during exercise. No blood-gas study shall be performed if medically contraindicated.
( b ) A blood-gas study shall initially be administered at rest and in a sitting position. If the results of the blood-gas test at rest do not satisfy the requirements of Appendix C to this part, an exercise blood-gas test shall be offered to the miner unless medically contraindicated. If an exercise blood-gas test is administered, blood shall be drawn during exercise.
( c ) Any report of a blood-gas study submitted in connection with a claim shall specify: ( 1 ) Date and time of test;
( 2 ) Altitude and barometric pressure at which the test was conducted;
( 3 ) Name and DOL claim number of the claimant;
( 4 ) Name of technician;
( 5 ) Name and signature of physician supervising the study;
( 6 ) The recorded values for PC02, P02, and PH, which have been collected simultaneously (specify values at rest and, if performed, during exercise);
( 7 ) Duration and type of exercise;
( 8 ) Pulse rate at the time the blood sample was drawn;
( 9 ) Time between drawing of sample and analysis of sample; and
( 10 ) Whether equipment was calibrated before and after each test.
( d ) If one or more blood-gas studies producing results which meet the appropriate table in Appendix C is administered during a hospitalization which ends in the miner's death, then any such study must be accompanied by a physician's report establishing that the test results were produced by a chronic respiratory or pulmonary condition. Failure to produce such a report will prevent reliance on the blood-gas study as evidence that the miner was totally disabled at death.
( e ) In the case of a deceased miner, where no blood gas tests are in substantial compliance with paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), noncomplying tests may form the basis for a finding if, in the opinion of the adjudication officer, the only available tests demonstrate technically valid results. This provision shall not excuse compliance with the requirements in paragraph (d) for any blood gas study administered during a hospitalization which ends in the miner's death.