alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 453.52

 453.77

 454.18

 454.50

 454.60

 454.69

 454.69

 454.25

 454.04

 454.04

 453.99

 454.04

 454.04

 455.10

 455.15

 455.07

 454.91

 454.90

 454.89

 454.34

 453.97

 453.74

 453.45

 453.24

 452.69

 451.45

 450.52

 449.85

 449.30

 448.68

 1,007,379

 1,009,888

 1,014,008

 1,017,227

 1,018,234

 1,019,140

 1,019,140

 1,014,712

 1,012,601

 1,012,601

 1,012,098

 1,012,601

 1,012,601

 1,023,273

 1,023,777

 1,022,970

 1,021,357

 1,021,256

 1,021,155

 1,015,617

 1,011,897

 1,009,587

 1,006,677

 1,004,571

 999,063

 986,682

 977,430

 970,782

 965,337

 959,210

STORAGE

+1,103

+2,509

+4,120

+3,219

+1,007

+906

+0

-4,428

-2,111

+0

-503

+503

+0

+10,672

+504

-807

-1,613

-101

-101

-5,538

-3,720

-2,310

-2,910

-2,106

-5,508

-12,381

-9,252

-6,648

-5,445

-6,127

CHANGE

687

1,275

2,461

1,617

587

587

0

0

0

0

0

2,666

2,117

1,617

490

1,617

260

0

0

0

0

517

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2,459

 1,082

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,234

 1,235

 0

 0

 2,689

 2,979

 1,538

 1,478

 925

 2,605

 6,263

 4,566

 2,975

 2,484

 2,930

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 6

 63

 125

 144

 174

 185

 99

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-131

-10

-384

+6

-80

-131

+0

+226

+18

+0

-254

-2,413

-2,117

+3,763

-235

-790

+162

-51

-51

-103

+1,104

-144

+12

-131

-109

+146

+45

-202

-76

-59

OR

 146

 130

 107

 108

 52

 114

 104

 36

 81

 42

 65

 91

 91

 98

 98

 108

 114

 98

 114

 107

 130

 130

 188

 136

 91

 49

 109

 112

 106

 96

C.F.S.

 .45

 .40

 .33

 .33

 .16

 .35

 .32

 .11

 .25

 .13

 .20

 .28

 .28

 .30

 .30

 .33

 .35

 .30

 .35

 .33

 .40

 .40

 .58

 .42

 .28

 .30

 .34

 .35

 .33

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR May 1, 2009

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2009 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -47,066 16,498 37,442 797 0 -1,989 3,051 9.55 .06

ACRE-FEET -47,066 32,724 74,266 1,581 0 -3,945 6,052

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 74,266

PACHECO TUNNEL 1,581 TOTAL 75,847

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2008 TO DATE = 6.26

 1,006,276

SPILL 0 .06

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.
### §6009. Enforcement

#### (a) Enforcement authority

The authority to enforce this chapter shall be carried out by the Secretary of the Treasury. The Secretary of the Treasury shall exercise the authorities of the Trading With the Enemy Act [50 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.] in enforcing this chapter. In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary of the Treasury shall take the necessary steps to ensure that activities permitted under section 6004 of this title are carried out for the purposes set forth in this chapter and not for purposes of the accumulation by the Cuban Government of excessive amounts of United States currency or the accumulation of excessive profits by any person or entity.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as may be necessary to carry out this chapter.

#### (c) Omitted

#### (d) Applicability of penalties

The penalties set forth in section 16 of the Trading With the Enemy Act [50 U.S.C. 4315] shall apply to violations of this chapter to the same extent as such penalties apply to violations under that Act [50 U.S.C. 4301 et seq.].

#### (e) Office of Foreign Assets Control

The Department of the Treasury shall establish and maintain a branch of the Office of Foreign Assets Control in Miami, Florida, in order to strengthen the enforcement of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 102–484, div. A, title XVII, §1710, Oct. 23, 1992, 106 Stat. 2580.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Trading With the Enemy Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (d), is act Oct. 6, 1917, ch. 106, 40 Stat. 411, which is classified to chapter 53 (§4301 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 1710 of Pub. L. 102–484. Subsec. (c) of section 1710 of Pub. L. 102–484 amended section 4315 of Title 50, War and National Defense.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Philip C. Ranker, VP Finance and Interim Chief Financial Officer of Nastech
Pharmaceutical Company Inc. ("Nastech"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Nastech.

Date: November 2, 2005

                                  By:     /s/ Philip C. Ranker
                                          --------------------------------------
                                  Name:   Philip C. Ranker
                                  Title:  VP Finance and Interim Chief Financial
                                          Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nastech and will be retained by Nastech and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Nastech for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       36
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 481.71

 482.26

 482.87

 483.83

 484.40

 484.95

 485.39

 486.31

 486.60

 486.86

 487.19

 487.46

 487.87

 488.29

 488.91

 488.94

 488.54

 488.52

 488.18

 487.93

 487.86

 487.64

 487.62

 487.59

 487.46

 487.35

 487.21

 487.08

 486.92

 486.35

 486.32

 1,302,864

 1,308,876

 1,315,554

 1,326,087

 1,332,354

 1,338,410

 1,343,262

 1,353,426

 1,356,635

 1,359,515

 1,363,172

 1,366,167

 1,370,719

 1,375,388

 1,382,289

 1,382,623

 1,378,169

 1,377,946

 1,374,164

 1,371,386

 1,370,608

 1,368,165

 1,367,943

 1,367,610

 1,366,167

 1,364,947

 1,363,394

 1,361,953

 1,360,179

 1,353,869

 1,353,537

STORAGE

+9,708

+6,012

+6,678

+10,533

+6,267

+6,056

+4,852

+10,164

+3,209

+2,880

+3,657

+2,995

+4,552

+4,669

+6,901

+334

-4,454

-223

-3,782

-2,778

-778

-2,443

-222

-333

-1,443

-1,220

-1,553

-1,441

-1,774

-6,310

-332

CHANGE

5,891

3,384

3,613

5,148

3,559

3,442

2,738

5,251

1,889

1,891

1,899

1,748

2,490

2,476

3,875

962

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1,224

 2,167

 0

 1,837

 1,360

 1,357

 0

 0

 0

 620

 620

 620

 623

 779

 3,079

 0

POWER

 87

 86

 72

 84

 74

 77

 77

 73

 80

 84

 68

 71

 69

 24

 22

 24

 22

 41

 52

 49

 53

 50

 46

 42

 44

 48

 54

 52

 52

 53

 36

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-909

-268

-175

+246

-326

-312

-215

-53

-192

-355

+13

-167

-127

-98

-374

+453

-57

-72

-18

+9

+1,018

-1,182

-66

-126

-63

+53

-108

-51

-64

-49

-132

OR

 50

 50

 46

 46

 43

 53

 50

 41

 90

 50

 61

 36

 61

 36

 79

 115

 65

 108

 108

 97

 97

 72

 97

 72

 79

 90

 93

 86

 129

 175

 161

C.F.S.

 .14

 .14

 .13

 .13

 .12

 .15

 .14

 .11

 .25

 .14

 .17

 .10

 .17

 .10

 .22

 .32

 .18

 .30

 .30

 .27

 .27

 .20

 .27

 .20

 .22

 .25

 .26

 .24

 .36

 .49

 .45

INCHES

 .72

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR June 10, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2015 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +60,381 50,256 14,286 1,766 0 -3,767 2,436 6.79 .86

ACRE-FEET +60,381 99,683 28,336 3,503 0 -7,472 4,832

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 28,336

PACHECO TUNNEL 3,503 TOTAL 31,839

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = 7.59

 1,293,156

SPILL 0 .86

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-286-CV

MELISSA DEANNE JETTON	APPELLANT

	V.

MARTHA HERNANDEZ AND 						APPELLEES

AN DEALERSHIP HOLDING CORP. 

D/B/A AUTONATION AND 

BANKSTON CHEVROLET	

	------------

	FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	Appellant Melissa Jetton is attempting to appeal from a trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees AN Dealership Holding Corp. d/b/a AutoNation and Bankston Chevrolet.  On August 23, 2007, we notified Appellant that we were concerned that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because the order granting summary judgment does not appear to dispose of all parties and issues in the case, nor does it appear to be an appealable interlocutory order.  See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 192-93 (Tex. 2001).  Additionally, we informed Appellant that the trial court had confirmed that no severance order had been signed severing Appellant’s claims against AN Dealership Holding Corp. and Bankston Chevrolet from Appellant’s claims against the other parties in the case.  We also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless Appellant or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response to the jurisdiction letter.

	Because there is no final judgment or appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this case for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a); 43.2(f).

							PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.

DELIVERED: September 27, 2007
(No. 74-CC-431

#### Sangamon County Sheriff’s Department, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Sangamon County Sheriff’s Department, Claimant, pro se.

*311William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.800 Who will enforce the LCAs and how will they be enforced? ( a ) *Authority of Administrator.* Except as provided in § 655.807, the Administrator shall perform all the Secretary's investigative and enforcement functions under sections 212(n) and (t) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1182(n) and (t)) and this subpart I and subpart H of this part.
( b ) *Conduct of investigations.* The Administrator, either pursuant to a complaint or otherwise, shall conduct such investigations as may be appropriate and, in connection therewith, enter and inspect such places and such records (and make transcriptions or copies thereof), question such persons and gather such information as deemed necessary by the Administrator to determine compliance regarding the matters which are the subject of the investigation.
( c ) *Employer cooperation/availability of records.* An employer shall at all times cooperate in administrative and enforcement proceedings. An employer being investigated shall make available to the Administrator such records, information, persons, and places as the Administrator deems appropriate to copy, transcribe, question, or inspect. No employer subject to the provisions of sections 212(n) or (t) of the INA and/or this subpart I or subpart H of this part shall interfere with any official of the Department of Labor performing an investigation, inspection or law enforcement function pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1182(n) or (t) or this subpart I or subpart H of this part. Any such interference shall be a violation of the labor condition application and this subpart I and subpart H of this part, and the Administrator may take such further actions as the Administrator considers appropriate. (Federal criminal statutes prohibit certain interference with a Federal officer in the performance of official duties. 18 U.S.C. 111 and 18 U.S.C. 1114.)
( d ) *Confidentiality.* The Administrator shall, to the extent possible under existing law, protect the confidentiality of any person who provides information to the Department in confidence in the course of an investigation or otherwise under this subpart I or subpart H of this part.
[65 FR 80233, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 69 FR 68228, Nov. 23, 2004]
§ 678.410 What other entities may serve as one-stop partners? ( a ) Other entities that carry out a workforce development program, including Federal, State, or local programs and programs in the private sector, may serve as additional partners in the one-stop delivery system if the Local WDB and chief elected official(s) approve the entity's participation.
( b ) Additional partners may include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Employment and training programs administered by the Social Security Administration, including the Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency Program established under sec. 1148 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-19);
( 2 ) Employment and training programs carried out by the Small Business Administration;
( 3 ) Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) employment and training programs, authorized under secs. 6(d)(4) and 6(o) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2015(d)(4));
( 4 ) Client Assistance Program authorized under sec. 112 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 732);
( 5 ) Programs authorized under the National and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12501 *et seq.*); and
( 6 ) Other appropriate Federal, State or local programs, including, but not limited to, employment, education, and training programs provided by public libraries or in the private sector.
#### UNITED PRODUCING COMPANY, Inc., a corporation, Appellant, v. PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.

No. 4703.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Sept. 8, 1954.

William J. Holloway, Jr., and Y. P. Crowe, Oklahoma City, Okl. (Embry, Johnson, Crowe, Tolbert & B oxley, Oklahoma City, Okl., H. W. Stubbs, and Stubbs & Wesley, Ulysses, Kan., on the brief), for appellant.

Mark H. Adams, Wichita, Kan., and William I. Robinson, Tulsa, Okl. (Edward H. Lange, Kansas City, Mo., and Adams, Jones, Robinson & Manka, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BRATTON, MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The case of Columbian Fuel Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 176 Kan. 433, 271 P.2d 773, was decided after entry of the judgment herein. On the authority of that case, the judgment is vacated and the cause is remanded.
Figure 2.7. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction between 63rd Street and Blue Parkway. 

94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

39°01'20"

39°01'30"

39°01'40"

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

Hardesty

Brighton

Avenue

Avenue

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 33,700 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 762 feet

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 838.39

 837.42

 836.96

 836.00

 835.90

 835.54

 835.67

 835.57

 835.38

 835.21

 835.30

 836.32

 834.80

 835.35

 835.96

 835.71

 835.44

 836.22

 837.21

 837.81

 838.28

 839.30

 839.74

 839.68

 839.60

 839.52

 839.49

 839.53

 839.67

 839.80

 47.06

 45.85

 45.29

 44.12

 44.00

 43.57

 43.72

 43.60

 43.38

 43.17

 43.28

 44.51

 42.69

 43.34

 44.07

 43.77

 43.45

 44.39

 45.60

 46.34

 46.92

 48.20

 48.76

 48.69

 48.59

 48.48

 48.45

 48.50

 48.68

 48.84

STORAGE

-0.60

-1.21

-0.57

-1.17

-0.12

-0.43

+0.16

-0.12

-0.23

-0.20

+0.11

+1.23

-1.82

+0.66

+0.73

-0.30

-0.32

+0.94

+1.21

+0.74

+0.59

+1.28

+0.56

-0.08

-0.10

-0.10

-0.04

+0.05

+0.18

+0.17

CHANGE

2,075

1,635

1,984

3,658

2,197

1,893

1,436

1,265

1,122

1,027

910

3,381

6,636

3,607

2,482

2,072

1,850

1,489

1,292

1,147

1,273

1,189

1,471

1,300

1,240

1,195

1,195

1,246

1,371

1,451

INFLOW

 1,774

 1,622

 1,646

 3,622

 1,622

 1,474

 714

 683

 596

 489

 214

 2,122

 6,920

 2,632

 1,467

 1,580

 1,369

 370

 51

 140

 360

 20

 593

 738

 695

 646

 612

 615

 677

 765

SPILL

 603

 619

 624

 622

 635

 635

 640

 640

 638

 638

 638

 640

 636

 639

 640

 639

 639

 641

 625

 626

 613

 516

 596

 596

 595

 595

 593

 594

 594

 595

OUTLET

 1

 2

 0

 2

 0

 2

 3

 2

 2

 3

 4

 0

 0

 5

 6

 4

 5

 5

 7

 7

 5

 6

 0

 5

 1

 5

 9

 11

 10

 8

C.F.S.

 .02

 .05

 .00

 .05

 .01

 .04

 .09

 .05

 .06

 .08

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .16

 .10

 .12

 .12

 .17

 .17

 .12

 .16

 .00

 .13

 .03

 .12

 .22

 .27

 .24

 .21

INCHES

 .44

 .13

 .93

 .03

 .14

 .02

 .00

 .11

 .02

 .03

 .08

 2.22

 .73

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .42

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

APRIL 2006 RUN DATE: 08/09/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +1.20 56,089 18,544 36,828 120 3.03 5.65

ACRE-FEET +1,200 111,253 36,782 73,048 238

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 73,048

OUTLET

TOTAL

 36,782

 109,830

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.65

JULY 1, 2005 28.28

 47.66

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Brian J. Martin,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                    
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Brian J. Martin                                                                                                              
|Brian J. Martin Chairman of the Board of Directors,President and Chief Executive Officerof the Managing General Partner May 17, 2004
#### In the Matter of the Application of Henry Cardos, Respondent, *v.*William H. Edwards, as Commissioner of the Department of Street Cleaning of the City of New York, Appellant.

Appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, as resettled by an order entered on the 4th day of June, 1913, directing the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus, and from an order entered on the 36th day of May, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam:

The verdict of the jury was clearly against the weight of evidence, and the order entered on the 36th day of May, 1913, denying the motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in answer to the questions submitted to them is reversed, the motion granted and a new trial ordered. The final order granting the mandamus entered on the 33d day of May, 1913, falls with the order setting aside the verdict, and that is also reversed, with costs to the defendant. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Final order reversed, with costs, order denying motion for new trial reversed and motion granted. Order to be settled on notice.
### §9004. Provisional remedies

#### (a) Authority of courts

In furtherance of the objectives of article 7(b) and other provisions of the Convention, and subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, any court exercising jurisdiction of an action brought under section 9003(b) of this title may take or cause to be taken measures under Federal or State law, as appropriate, to protect the well-being of the child involved or to prevent the child's further removal or concealment before the final disposition of the petition.

#### (b) Limitation on authority

No court exercising jurisdiction of an action brought under section 9003(b) of this title may, under subsection (a) of this section, order a child removed from a person having physical control of the child unless the applicable requirements of State law are satisfied.

(Pub. L. 100–300, §5, Apr. 29, 1988, 102 Stat. 439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 11604 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare.
§ 652.208 How are applicable career services related to the methods of service delivery described in in this part? Career services may be delivered through any of the applicable three methods of service delivery described in § 652.207(b)(2). These methods are: ( a ) Self-service, including virtual services;
( b ) Facilitated self-help service; and
( c ) Staff-assisted service.