alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §6533. Abolition of Office of Inspector General of United States Information Agency and transfer of functions

#### (a) Abolition of Office

The Office of Inspector General of the United States Information Agency is abolished.

#### (b) to (d) Omitted

#### (e) Transfer of functions

There are transferred to the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of State and the Foreign Service the functions that the Office of Inspector General of the United States Information Agency exercised before the effective date of this subchapter (including all related functions of the Inspector General of the United States Information Agency).

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIII, §1314, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–776.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

For the effective date of this subchapter, referred to in subsec. (e), meaning the effective date of title XIII of subdiv. A of div. G of Pub. L. 105–277, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as a note under section 6531 of this title.

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 1314 of Pub. L. 105–277. Subsec. (b) of section 1314 of Pub. L. 105–277 amended section 11 of the Inspector General Act of 1978, formerly set out in the Appendix to Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and subsecs. (c) and (d) of section 1314 of Pub. L. 105–277 amended section 5315 of Title 5 and section 6207 of this title, respectively.
### §277d–15. Integration of operation of dam with other United States water conservation activities

If a dam is constructed pursuant to an agreement concluded under the authorization granted by section 277d–13 of this title, its operation for conservation and release of United States share of waters shall be integrated with other United States water conservation activities on the Rio Grande below Fort Quitman, Texas, in such manner as to provide the maximum feasible amount of water for beneficial use in the United States with the understandings that (a) releases of United States share of waters from said dam for domestic, municipal, industrial, and irrigation uses in the United States shall be made pursuant to order by the appropriate authority or authorities of the State of Texas, and (b) the State of Texas having stipulated that the amount of water that will be available for use in the United States below Falcon Dam after the proposed dam is placed in operation will be not less than the amount available under existing conditions of river development, and to carry out such understandings and said stipulation the conservation storage of said dam shall be used, and it shall be the exclusive responsibility of the appropriate authority or authorities of said State to distribute available United States share of waters of the Rio Grande in such manner as will comply with said stipulation.

(Pub. L. 86–605, §3, July 7, 1960, 74 Stat. 360.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.21

 130.20

 130.16

 130.10

 130.12

 130.08

 130.05

 130.11

 130.07

 130.10

 130.12

 130.15

 129.99

 129.81

 131.19

 130.35

 129.69

 129.68

 129.48

 129.29

 129.26

 129.40

 129.43

 129.09

 129.11

 129.25

 129.16

 129.22

 129.17

 129.31

 129.41

 602

 601

 597

 591

 593

 589

 586

 592

 588

 591

 593

 596

 580

 561

 713

 618

 550

 549

 529

 511

 508

 522

 525

 493

 495

 508

 499

 505

 500

 513

 523

STORAGE

+0

-1

-4

-6

+2

-4

-3

+6

-4

+3

+2

+3

-16

-19

+152

-95

-68

-1

-20

-18

-3

+14

+3

-32

+2

+13

-9

+6

-5

+13

+10

CHANGE

80

81

79

78

80

78

79

84

79

82

79

79

76

78

192

89

61

98

96

102

107

112

98

77

94

100

99

107

105

104

98

INFLOW

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 46

 45

 43

 43

 70

 106

 43

 40

 39

 39

 39

 39

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

 38

PUTAH

 34

 35

 35

 35

 33

 34

 35

 35

 35

 34

 32

 32

 41

 45

 45

 31

 52

 59

 67

 72

 70

 66

 58

 55

 55

 55

 66

 66

 70

 59

 55

PUTAH

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .01

 .28

 .14

 .04

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .06

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .68

 .41

 .27

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .04

 2.20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .35

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2016 RUN DATE: 01/03/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -79 2,851 1,496 1,394 1 1.21 4.35

ACRE-FEET -79 5,655 2,967 2,765 2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,765

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,967

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.35

JULY 1, 2016 8.15

 602

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 8.15
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 517.52

 518.57

 519.66

 520.62

 521.70

 522.75

 524.16

 525.28

 526.24

 527.11

 528.17

 529.20

 530.25

 531.38

 532.49

 533.45

 534.06

 534.60

 535.13

 535.87

 536.53

 537.07

 537.58

 538.09

 538.60

 539.10

 539.60

 540.13

 1,713,192

 1,725,793

 1,738,907

 1,750,485

 1,763,543

 1,776,270

 1,793,410

 1,807,066

 1,818,799

 1,829,455

 1,842,467

 1,855,141

 1,868,093

 1,882,066

 1,895,827

 1,907,756

 1,915,350

 1,922,081

 1,928,695

 1,937,943

 1,946,204

 1,952,973

 1,959,373

 1,965,780

 1,972,194

 1,978,490

 1,984,793

 1,991,481

STORAGE

+13,406

+12,601

+13,114

+11,578

+13,058

+12,727

+17,140

+13,656

+11,733

+10,656

+13,012

+12,674

+12,952

+13,973

+13,761

+11,929

+7,594

+6,731

+6,614

+9,248

+8,261

+6,769

+6,400

+6,407

+6,414

+6,296

+6,303

+6,688

CHANGE

7,025

6,484

6,637

5,870

6,717

6,527

7,286

6,894

5,777

5,880

6,870

6,755

7,063

7,560

7,560

6,590

3,877

3,622

3,603

3,600

3,583

3,580

3,567

3,544

3,540

3,540

3,520

3,520

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 86

 124

 173

 154

 178

 172

 180

 173

 168

 177

 178

 174

 113

 140

 102

 68

 87

 96

 102

 94

 109

 103

 104

 104

 111

 102

 96

 150

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-180

-8

+148

+122

+44

+62

+1,536

+163

+307

-331

-131

-191

-420

-376

-520

-508

+38

-133

-166

+1,156

+691

-65

-237

-210

-196

-264

-247

+2

OR

 16

 16

 27

 90

 51

 31

 8

 47

 28

 16

 28

 40

 40

 24

 36

 32

 56

 8

 53

 0

 61

 37

 85

 20

 57

 12

 69

 61

C.F.S.

 .04

 .04

 .07

 .23

 .13

 .08

 .02

 .12

 .07

 .04

 .07

 .10

 .10

 .06

 .09

 .08

 .14

 .02

 .13

 .00

 .15

 .09

 .21

 .05

 .14

 .03

 .17

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .32

 .01

 .25

 .01

 .08

 .31

 .46

 .01

 .43

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .44

 .11

 .13

 .63

 .54

 .16

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR March 31, 2017

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2017 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +291,695 150,591 0 3,618 0 +86 1,049 2.62 3.92

ACRE-FEET +291,695 298,697 0 7,176 0 +171 2,081

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 7,176 TOTAL 7,176

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2016 TO DATE = 13.96

 1,699,786

SPILL 0 3.92

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 13.96
#### § 422.527 Private printing and modification of prescribed applications, forms, and other publications.

Any person, institution, or organization wishing to reproduce, reprint, or distribute any application, form, or publication prescribed by the Administration must obtain prior approval if he or she intends to charge a fee. Requests for approval must be in writing and include the reason or need for the reproduction, reprinting, or distribution; the intended users of the application, form, or publication; the fee to be charged; any proposed modification; the proposed format; the type of machinery (e.g., printer, burster, mail handling), if any, for which the application, form, or publication is being designed; estimated printing quantity; estimated printing cost per thousand; estimated annual usage; and any other pertinent information required by the Administration. Forward all requests for prior approval to: Office of Publications Management, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401.

[72 FR 73261, Dec. 27, 2007]
[No. 8301.

Department Two.

November 24, 1909.]

#### W. F. Hays, *Appellant,*v. Terrence O’Brien, *as Administrator of the Estate of John Sullivan, Deceased,*and Marie Carrau *et al., Respondents.*
      *1*

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Yakey, J., entered March 11, 1909, refusing to vacate a Judgment, after a hearing before the court.

Appeal dismissed.

*Henry St. Rayner*and W. *E. Hays,*for appellant.

*E. M. Carr*and *Corwin S. Shante,*for respondents.

Reported in 105 Pac. 162.

Pee Curiam.

This is another appeal from the same case which, we were discussing in No. 8302, *Hays v. O’Brien, ante*p. 67, 105 Pac.. 162. Por the reason that the order complained of is not a determination by the lower court from which an appeal will lie to this court, the motion to dismiss this case will be sustained.
### §2680–1. Deadline for responses to questions from congressional committees

#### (a) In general

An officer or employee of the Department of State to whom a written or oral question is addressed by any member of a committee specified in subsection (b), acting within his official capacity, shall respond to such question within 21 days unless the Secretary of State submits a letter to such member explaining why a timely response cannot be made.

#### (b) Specified committees

The committees referred to in subsection (a) are the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §196, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 684.)
### §283j. Increased United States participation in Bank activities

The United States Governor of the Bank is hereby authorized (1) to vote (A) for the increases in the authorized capital stock of the Bank under article II, Section 2, of the agreement, and (B) for an increase in the resources of the Fund for Special Operations under article IV, section 3, of the agreement, all as recommended by the Executive Directors in a report dated March 18, 1963, to the Board of Governors of the Bank; (2) to agree on behalf of the United States to subscribe to its proportionate share of the $1,000,000,000 increase in the authorized callable capital stock of the Bank; and (3) to vote for an amendment to article VIII, section 3, of the agreement to provide that the Board of Governors may, upon certain conditions, increase by one the number of Executive Directors.

(Pub. L. 86–147, §13, as added Pub. L. 88–259, §1, Jan. 22, 1964, 78 Stat. 3.)
§ 680.480 May an eligible training provider lose its eligibility? ( a ) Yes. A training provider must meet the Governors requirements for eligibility and provide accurate information in order to retain its status as an eligible training provider.
( b ) Providers determined to have intentionally supplied inaccurate information or to have substantially violated any provision of title I of WIOA or the WIOA regulations, including 29 CFR part 38, must be removed from the State list of eligible training providers and programs in accordance with the enforcement provisions of WIOA sec. 122(f). A provider whose eligibility is terminated under these conditions must be terminated for not less than 2 years and is liable to repay all youth, adult, and dislocated worker training funds it received during the period of noncompliance. The Governor must specify in the procedures which individual or entity is responsible for making these determinations and the process by which the determination will be made, which must include an opportunity for a hearing that meets the requirements of § 683.630(b) of this chapter.
( c ) As a part of the biennial review of eligibility established by the Governor, the State must remove programs of training services that fail to meet criteria established by the Governor to remain eligible, which may include failure to meet established minimum performance levels. Registered apprenticeship programs only may be removed for the reasons set forth in § 680.470.
( d ) The Governor must establish an appeals procedure for providers of training services to appeal a denial of eligibility under this subpart that meets the requirements of § 683.630(b) of this chapter, which explains the appeals process for denial or termination of eligibility of a provider of training services.
( e ) Where a Local WDB has established higher minimum performance standards, according to § 680.430(e), the Local WDB may remove a program of training services from the eligible programs in that local area for failure to meet those higher performance standards. Training providers may appeal a denial of eligibility under § 683.630(b) of this chapter.
### §9112. Standards and assistance

The Secretary of State shall—

(1) ensure that United States diplomatic and consular missions abroad—

(A) maintain a consistent reporting standard with respect to abduction and access cases;

(B) designate at least 1 senior official in each such mission, at the discretion of the Chief of Mission, to assist left-behind parents from the United States who are visiting such country or otherwise seeking to resolve abduction or access cases; and

(C) monitor developments in abduction and access cases; and

(2) develop and implement written strategic plans for engagement with any Convention or non-Convention country in which there are 5 or more cases of international child abduction.

(Pub. L. 113–150, title I, §102, Aug. 8, 2014, 128 Stat. 1815.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000737210
<NAME> LNB BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          19,369
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             105
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,077
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          89,158
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            89,029
<LOANS>                                        305,786
<ALLOWANCE>                                     (4,089)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 445,448
<DEPOSITS>                                     371,004
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,346
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,974
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,138
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 445,448
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,655
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,593
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     8
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,256
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,730
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,999
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,257
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      125
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,312
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,525
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,525
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.19
<LOANS-NON>                                        597
<LOANS-PAST>                                       180
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,207
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,116
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      174
<RECOVERIES>                                        22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,089
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,010
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,079

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos LOERA-CENTENO, also known as J. Felix Loera-Centeno, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40007

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 8, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KING, DeMOSS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Carlos Loera-Centeno appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found in the United States after having been previously deported. He was sentenced to 55 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Loera-Centeno asserts that his sentence is invalid in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Because the district court sentenced Loera-Centeno under a mandatory guidelines regime, it committed a Fanfan error. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005). Because the Government concedes that Loera-Centeno preserved his Fanfan claim, this court reviews for harmless error. *Id.; United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 43, 163 L.Ed.2d 76 (2005). Under this standard of review, the Government bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the district court would not have sentenced Lo-era-Centeno differently under an advisory guidelines sentencing regime. *Walters,*418 F.3d at 464. The record contains no indication that the district court would have imposed the same sentence absent the error. The Government thus cannot meet its burden. Accordingly, Loera-Centeno’s sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for resentencing.

Loera-Centeno’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Loera-Centeno contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Loera-Centeno properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez*
      *552
      *Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.65

 130.65

 130.56

 130.63

 130.77

 130.73

 130.65

 130.64

 130.76

 130.64

 130.47

 130.66

 130.79

 130.76

 130.87

 130.80

 130.70

 130.79

 130.66

 130.46

 130.56

 130.58

 130.40

 130.36

 130.34

 130.21

 130.57

 130.66

 130.50

 130.39

 650

 650

 640

 648

 664

 659

 650

 649

 663

 649

 630

 651

 666

 663

 675

 667

 656

 666

 651

 629

 640

 642

 623

 619

 616

 602

 641

 651

 633

 622

STORAGE

+7

+0

-10

+8

+16

-5

-9

-1

+14

-14

-19

+21

+15

-3

+12

-8

-11

+10

-15

-22

+11

+2

-19

-4

-3

-14

+39

+10

-18

-11

CHANGE

490

485

487

461

443

424

430

428

403

387

406

430

409

408

417

416

432

429

375

342

387

392

332

326

316

298

302

272

257

256

INFLOW

 31

 30

 30

 27

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 30

 35

 30

 30

 30

 28

 28

 27

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 24

 22

 20

 20

 20

PUTAH

 454

 454

 461

 429

 409

 401

 409

 403

 370

 368

 385

 383

 370

 379

 380

 391

 409

 397

 358

 327

 355

 365

 317

 302

 293

 281

 259

 246

 245

 241

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .18

 .18

 .29

 .27

 .28

 .25

 .34

 .24

 .21

 .20

 .19

 .17

 .21

 .15

 .32

 .18

 .15

 .14

 .14

 .17

 .19

 .15

 .14

 .16

 .11

 .13

 .15

 .25

 .15

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .39

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2001 RUN DATE: 10/26/2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -21 11,640 10,841 787 25 5.90 .39

ACRE-FEET -21 23,088 21,503 1,561 50

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,561

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 21,503

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .39

JULY 1, 2001 .39

 643

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
#### Latin-American Contracting and Improvement Company, Respondent, v. David F. Broderick, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on *Dwelle*v. *Allen*(151 App. Div. 717). Present—Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
(June 18, 1943.)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Aaron Janowitz, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., TJntermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.