alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5603. United States export controls

The President shall—

(1) use the authorities of the Arms Export Control Act [22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.] to control the export of those defense articles and defense services, and

(2) use the authorities of the Export Administration Act of 1979 to control the export of those goods and technology,

that the President determines would assist the government of any foreign country in acquiring the capability to develop, produce, stockpile, deliver, or use chemical or biological weapons.

(Pub. L. 102–182, title III, §304(a), Dec. 4, 1991, 105 Stat. 1246.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Arms Export Control Act, referred to in par. (1), is Pub. L. 90–629, Oct. 22, 1968, 82 Stat. 1320, which is classified principally to chapter 39 (§2751 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2751 of this title and Tables.

The Export Administration Act of 1979, referred to in par. (2), is Pub. L. 96–72, Sept. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 503, which was classified principally to chapter 56 (§4601 et seq.) of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 115–232, div. A, title XVII, §1766(a), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2232, except for sections 11A, 11B, and 11C thereof (50 U.S.C. 4611, 4612, 4613).
### SUBCHAPTER III—SPECIAL TRUSTEE FOR AMERICAN INDIANS
§ 661.410 What provisions of WIA and the Wagner-Peyser Act may be waived, and what provisions may not be waived? ( a ) The Secretary may waive any of the statutory or regulatory requirements of subtitles B and E of title I of WIA, except for requirements relating to: ( 1 ) Wage and labor standards;
( 2 ) Non-displacement protections;
( 3 ) Worker rights;
( 4 ) Participation and protection of workers and participants;
( 5 ) Grievance procedures and judicial review;
( 6 ) Nondiscrimination;
( 7 ) Allocation of funds to local areas;
( 8 ) Eligibility of providers or participants;
( 9 ) The establishment and functions of local areas and local boards;
( 10 ) Procedures for review and approval of State and Local plans; and
( b ) The Secretary may waive any of the statutory or regulatory requirements of sections 8 through 10 of the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49g-49i) except for requirements relating to: ( 1 ) The provision of services to unemployment insurance claimants and veterans; and
( 2 ) Universal access to the basic labor exchange services without cost to job seekers.
( c ) The Secretary does not intend to waive any of the statutory or regulatory provisions essential to the key reform principles embodied in the Workforce Investment Act, described in § 661.400, except in extremely unusual circumstances where the provision can be demonstrated as impeding reform. (WIA sec. 189(i).)
MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00329-CV

FARIHA ASHFAQ, Appellant

V.

MOHAMMAD ASHFAQ, Appellee

Appeal from the 246th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011-60365).

TO THE 246TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 28th day of April 2015, the case upon appeal to revise or 

to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed 

by the trial court on September 27, 2013. After submitting 

the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly 

raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s 

judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the 

Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below 

for observance.

Judgment rendered April 28, 2015.
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bland.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

July 13, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4195 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4195

    To repeal the authorizations for office space, office expenses, 
franking and printing privileges, and staff for former Speakers of the 
                       House of Representatives.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 9, 2015

   Mr. Jones (for himself, Mr. Massie, and Mr. Yoho) introduced the 
     following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To repeal the authorizations for office space, office expenses, 
franking and printing privileges, and staff for former Speakers of the 
                       House of Representatives.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FORMER SPEAKERS.

    (a) Repeal of Authorizations for Office Space, Office Expenses, 
Franking and Printing Privileges, and Staff.--The first section and 
sections 2, 4, 5, and 8 of House Resolution 1238, Ninety-first 
Congress, agreed to December 22, 1970 (as enacted into permanent law by 
chapter VIII of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1971) (2 U.S.C. 
5125(a), 5126, 5127, 5128, and 5129), are repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (b) of the first section of 
Public Law 93-532 (2 U.S.C. 5125(b)) is repealed.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to any individual who is a former Speaker of the House of 
Representatives at any time before, on, or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nicholaz URQUIZA, a.k.a. Nicholas Urquiza, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-13684

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 05-00024-CR-ORL-31-DAB.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 21, 2006.

Charles Leslie Handlin, III, Handlin & Hefferan, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

*360Sandra Woodall Deisler, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Before DUBINA, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Charles L. Handlin, appointed counsel for. Nicholaz Urquiza, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Urquiza’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 185 (Friday, September 24, 2004)]
[Notices]
[Page 57328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-21429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, ZAA1 HH (03)--Review of U18 
Applications.
    Date: October 13, 2004.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Fishers Building, 5635 
Fishers Lane, Room 3033, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone conference 
call).
    Contact Person: Jeffrey I. Toward, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on 
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Extramural Project Review Branch, OSA, 
5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304. (301) 435-5337. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#274d534850465543674a464e4b09494e4f09404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b9d3cdd6ced8cbddf9d4d8d0d597d7d0d197ded6cf">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 17, 2004.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 04-21429 Filed 9-23-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
###### Editorial Note on Part 602

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 602 appear at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006.

#### § 602.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to prescribe a Quality Control (QC) program for the Federal-State unemployment compensation (UC) system, which is applicable to the State UC programs and the Federal unemployment benefit and allowance programs administered by the State unemployment compensation agencies under agreements between the States and the Secretary of Labor (Secretary). QC will be a major tool to assess the timeliness and accuracy of State administration of the UC program. It is designed to identify errors in claims processes and revenue collections (including payments in lieu of contributions and Extended Unemployment Compensation Account collections), analyze causes, and support the initiation of corrective action.

[52 FR 33528, Sept. 3, 1987, as amended at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006]
#### Michael Henry SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 04-41210.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 1, 2006.

Michael Henry Smith, Yazoo City, MS, pro se.

Andrea Lynn Parker, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Texas, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

*387PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Henry Smith, federal prisoner #04325-003, appeals the dismissal of his Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) complaint. The district court dismissed Smith’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction after determining that the Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) staff members involved in the actions Smith challenged in his administrative grievances were sufficiently related to their official duties to entitle the United States to immunity under the FTCA,

Smith complains that the district court (1) failed to conduct a de novo review of the magistrate judge’s second report and recommendation; (2) erroneously changed its factfindings by adopting that second report after having accepted the magistrate judge’s first report and recommendation; and (3) erred in concluding that the complained-of acts of the BOP staff members were sufficiently related to their official duties to afford the United States immunity under to the FTCA’s waiver exception contained in 28 U.S.C. § 2860(c). We disagree that the district court failed to conduct a de novo review or to change any factfindings that were relevant to the dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Smith’s first two contentions are therefore without merit.

We further conclude that the acts of the BOP staff members in connection with the shipping of prisoners’ personal property and the receipt and forwarding of prisoners’ packages were at least remotely related to their official duties: That is sufficient for purposes of immunity. *See Capozzoli v. Tracey,*663 F.2d 654, 658 (5th Cir.1981). The district court did not err by dismissing Smith’s complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. *See Jeanmarie v. United States,*242 F.3d 600, 602 (5th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,695,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  232,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    637,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,648,719
<PP&E>                                         515,594
<DEPRECIATION>                                 115,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,077,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          239,578
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,092
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,787,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,077,904
<SALES>                                         71,498
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               162,780
<CGS>                                           17,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               813,982
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (668,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (668,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (668,735)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
A-AA+Skip to content

                  - Home
                  - Compendium Statistics
                  - Event
                  - Archives
                  - Glossary
                  - Help
                  - Contact
                  - Research on Disability

Annual Disability Statistics Compendium

              - Home /
              - Archives /
              - 2012 Compendium Statistics /
              - 2012 Population and Prevalence /
              - 2012 1.4 Civilians Aged Under 5 Years Living in the Community in the U.S.

## Table 1.4: Civilians Ages Under Five Years Living in the Community for the United States and States, by Disability Status: 2011

----

----

 

----

#### 2012 Disability Compendium

                        - Home
                        - Compendium Statistics                           - Population and Prevelance
                          - Employment
                          - Time Trend Population Statistics
                          - Poverty
                          - Earnings
                          - Veterans
                          - Health Insurance Coverage
                          - Health
                          - Social Security Administration Programs
                          - Medicaid and Medicare
                          - Special Education
                          - Vocational Rehabilitation
                          - Federal Government Spending and Employment
                          - International Disability Statistics
                          - Population Statistics: Disability Type
                        - Event
                        - Archives                           - 2012 Compendium Statistics
                        - Glossary
                        - Help
                        - Contact
                        - Research on Disability

#### Funding for this project is made possible by:

 The Research and Training Center on Disability Statistics and Demographics (StatsRRTC), which is funded by the U.S. Department of Education, National Institute for Disability and Rehabilitation Research, under cooperative agreements H133B080012.

#### Stay Connected

**Institute on Disability**10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101Durham, NH 03824603.862.4320 | relay: 711 | [email protected]www.iod.unh.edu

© 2013. Institute on Disability.University of New Hampshire.
### §1300b–13. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, Pub. L. 97–429, §4, Jan. 8, 1983, 96 Stat. 2269, which related to establishment of membership roll, was omitted from the Code as being of special and not general application.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 165

 164

 163

 163

 163

 162

 160

 159

 157

 157

 159

 157

 157

 159

 157

 162

 161

 159

 159

 158

 159

 160

 163

 168

 175

 202

 235

 232

 276

 241

 132

 128

 135

 136

 131

 132

 132

 132

 136

 139

 138

 139

 137

 137

 136

 135

 135

 142

 149

 152

 154

 152

 152

 155

 159

 160

 159

 157

 155

 156

 157

 155

 157

 157

 155

 154

 151

 150

 150

 151

 152

 151

 151

 151

 150

 150

 150

 152

 155

 156

 157

 157

 158

 160

 164

 168

 182

 183

 193

 182

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        Report of Foreign Private Issuer

                        Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of   March, 2003
Commission File Number 333-7182-01

                                   CEZ, a. s.
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                                c/o Duhova 2/1444
                                 140 53 Prague 4
                                 Czech Republic
                    ----------------------------------------
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                        Form 20-F  X       Form 40-F
                                  ---                ---

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ____

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as
permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ____

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                               Yes          No  X
                                   ---         ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________
<PAGE>

The following information was filed by CEZ, a. s. in Czech language with the
Prague Stock Exchange as required by its rules and regulations:

The board of directors of CEZ, a. s. elected not to avail itself of the
opportunity to file a motion against the "Decision of the Chairman of the Office
for Protection of Economic Competition of March 18, 2003" with the applicable
court with regard to the matter of an approval of a concentration between the
undertakings consisting of CEZ, a. s., and the regional power distribution
companies.

Changes in membership in bodies of the members of the supervisory board of CEZ,
a. s.
<PAGE>

                                   Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                                        CEZ, a. s.
                                                 ------------------------
                                                       (Registrant)
Date: April 1, 2003
                                              By:
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                       Libuse Latalova
                                                 Head of Finance Administration
### §283x. Subscription to additional shares; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is hereby authorized to vote for an additional increase of one hundred and eight thousand shares of $10,000 par value in the authorized callable capital stock of the Bank as recommended in the resolution of the Board of Governors entitled "Increase of US$4 Billion in the Authorized Capital Stock and Subscriptions Thereto." Upon adoption of a Board of Governors resolution increasing the authorized capital stock of the Bank by such amount, the United States Governor is authorized to agree on behalf of the United States to subscribe to thirty-seven thousand three hundred and three shares of $10,000 par value of such additional increase in callable capital in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of such resolution.

(b) In order to pay for the increase in the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in this section, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $450,002,218 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 86–147, §27, as added Pub. L. 94–302, title I, §101, May 31, 1976, 90 Stat. 591.)