alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         352,529
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               429,463
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,564,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        80,922
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,530,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,564,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,516
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                87,519
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (31,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.004)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.004)
        

</TABLE>
§ 725.201 Who is entitled to benefits; contents of this subpart. ( a ) Part C of the Act provides for the payment of periodic benefits in accordance with this part to: ( 1 ) A miner who meets the conditions of entitlement set forth in § 725.202(d); or
( 2 ) The surviving spouse or surviving divorced spouse of a deceased miner who meets the conditions of entitlement set forth in § 725.212; or,
( 3 ) Where neither exists, the child of a deceased miner who meets the conditions of entitlement set forth in § 725.218; or
( 4 ) The surviving dependent parents, where there is no surviving spouse or child, or the surviving dependent brothers or sisters, where there is no surviving spouse, child, or parent, of a miner, who meet the conditions of entitlement set forth in § 725.222; or
( 5 ) The child of a miner's surviving spouse who was receiving benefits under Part C of the Act at the time of such spouse's death.
( b ) The provisions contained in this subpart describe the conditions of entitlement to benefits applicable to a miner, or a surviving spouse, child, parent, brother, or sister, and the events which establish or terminate entitlement to benefits.
( c ) In order for an entitled miner or surviving spouse to qualify for augmented benefits because of one or more dependents, such dependents must meet relationship and dependency requirements with respect to such beneficiary prescribed by or pursuant to the Act. Such requirements are also set forth in this subpart.
[65 FR 80054, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 59117, Sept. 25, 2013]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arturo DE LA GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40971.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Kathlyn Giannaula Snyder, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Brent Evan Newton, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*648Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Arturo De La Garza was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea of inducing an alien to enter the United States, bringing an alien into the United States, and transporting an alien within the United States. He argues that the sentences imposed in his case are unconstitutional and should be vacated because they were imposed under the mandatory United States Sentencing Guidelines held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

By sentencing De La Garza under a mandatory sentencing guidelines regime, the district court committed what this court refers to as *Fanfan*error. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir.2005). The Government concedes that De La Garza preserved his *Fanfan*claim for appellate review. A *Fanfan*error is not structural error. Thus, this court reviews the district court’s actions for harmless error. *See id.*

At De La Garza’s sentencing hearing, the district court noted that if the United States Sentencing Guidelines were held unconstitutional it would impose the same term of imprisonment it had previously imposed. In light of that statement, the Government has carried its burden of establishing that the district court’s sentencing error was harmless. *See id.*at 464; *United States v. Saldana,*427 F.3d 298, 314-15 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 810, 163 L.Ed.2d 637 (2005), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 1097, 163 L.Ed.2d 911 (2006).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §6035. United States opposition to termination of suspension of Cuban Government from participation in Organization of American States

The President should instruct the United States Permanent Representative to the Organization of American States to oppose and vote against any termination of the suspension of the Cuban Government from participation in the Organization until the President determines under section 6063(c)(3) of this title that a democratically elected government in Cuba is in power.

(Pub. L. 104–114, title I, §105, Mar. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 795.)
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Waterstone Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard C. Larson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













/s/ Richard C. Larson


Richard C. Larson


Chief Financial Officer


March 16, 2010
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle travel map. PikeNational Forest. San Carlos Ranger District, Colorado**
 
2012:Front | Back
2016:Front | Back
2017:Front | Back
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:P 63/11/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:001037488
 
December 14, 2017
§ 1784.0-5 Definitions. As used in this subpart, the term: ( a ) *Advisory committee* means any committee, council, or board established or utilized for purposes of obtaining advice or recommendations.
( b ) *Secretary* means Secretary of the Interior.
( c ) *Director* means the Director of the Bureau of Land Management.
( d ) *Designated Federal officer* means the Federal officer or employee designated by an advisory committee charter who approves meeting agendas and attends all meetings of the committee and its subcommittees, if any.
( e ) *Public lands* means any lands and interest in lands owned by the United States administered by the Secretary of the Interior through the Bureau of Land Management, except: ( 1 ) Lands located on the Outer Continental Shelf; and
( 2 ) Lands held for the benefit of Indians, Aleuts, and Eskimos.
[45 FR 8177, Feb. 6, 1980, as amended at 60 FR 9958, Feb. 22, 1995]
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### §§ 655.21-655.29 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-29-1999
<CASH>                                         166,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,788,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   782,000
<INVENTORY>                                 10,290,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,574,000
<PP&E>                                       7,708,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,983,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,892,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,536,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          168,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,970,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,660,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,892,000
<SALES>                                     13,436,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,436,000
<CGS>                                        9,706,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,195,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             273,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (24,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.1



November 30, 2018


Mr. Robert Iger
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
The Walt Disney Company
500 S. Buena Vista Avenue
Burbank, CA


Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
Dated as of October 6, 2011, as amended 


This letter amends your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated October 6, 2011, as amended by letters dated July 1, 2013, October 2, 2014, March 22, 2017 and December 13, 2017 (as amended, the “Agreement”), to modify the performance conditions applicable to certain performance stock unit awards in the manner specified below. 
1.  The terms and conditions of the Extension PSUs as originally set forth in Section 5 of the letter dated December 13, 2017 shall be as set forth in the attached Performance-Based Stock Unit Award Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2017 and as amended and restated as of the date hereof (the “Restated 2017 Award Agreement”). 
2.  As to any annual performance stock unit awards to be issued in accordance with Section 3 of the letter dated December 13, 2017 at or following the Transaction Closing Date, notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 3(c)(ii)(A) and 3(c)(ii)(E) of the Agreement, if the Total Shareholder Return (as such term is defined in the Restated 2017 Award Agreement) of the Company with respect to the applicable performance period is negative, not more that 100% of the units subject to such award shall be earned and payable. 
3.  Except as specified above, the Agreement shall otherwise continue in accordance with its terms and, in the event of any conflict between the terms contained 























herein and the Agreement, the terms contained herein shall govern.  Defined terms used, but not defined, in this letter have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Agreement. 


If you agree that the foregoing sets forth our full understanding regarding the amendment of the Agreement, please evidence your agreement and acceptance by counter-signing two copies of this letter where indicated below, returning one executed copy to me.


THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY


/s/ Alan N. Braverman                
 By: Alan N. Braverman 
 Senior Executive Vice President,
 General Counsel and Secretary




AGREED AND ACEPTED:


/s/ Robert A. Iger                      
Robert A. Iger 


Dated: November  30, 2018




2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 839.68

 839.55

 839.50

 839.53

 839.39

 839.14

 840.05

 840.43

 839.88

 839.43

 839.12

 839.03

 839.03

 838.94

 839.03

 839.11

 839.06

 838.75

 838.80

 838.87

 838.93

 838.96

 838.95

 838.95

 838.95

 838.92

 838.88

 838.74

 838.72

 838.78

 48.69

 48.52

 48.46

 48.49

 48.32

 48.00

 49.16

 49.65

 48.94

 48.37

 47.98

 47.86

 47.86

 47.75

 47.86

 47.96

 47.90

 47.51

 47.57

 47.66

 47.74

 47.77

 47.76

 47.76

 47.76

 47.72

 47.67

 47.50

 47.47

 47.55

STORAGE

-0.17

-0.17

-0.06

+0.04

-0.18

-0.32

+1.16

+0.49

-0.71

-0.57

-0.39

-0.11

+0.00

-0.11

+0.11

+0.10

-0.06

-0.39

+0.06

+0.09

+0.08

+0.04

-0.01

+0.00

+0.00

-0.04

-0.05

-0.18

-0.03

+0.08

CHANGE

259

261

314

362

254

177

1,242

1,789

1,332

461

465

354

345

289

405

404

311

148

120

97

76

57

31

40

39

22

15

-50

26

70

INFLOW

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 906

 1,053

 117

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

SPILL

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 307

 628

 628

 628

 628

 628

 376

 310

 310

 310

 310

 310

 310

 53

 15

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 6

 7

 8

 7

 6

 0

 0

 9

 6

 5

 5

 5

 5

 6

 8

 13

 3

 5

 5

 8

 8

 8

 8

 10

 9

 11

 10

 9

 9

 2

C.F.S.

 .14

 .18

 .20

 .18

 .15

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .15

 .12

 .13

 .12

 .12

 .14

 .20

 .32

 .07

 .12

 .12

 .21

 .19

 .21

 .20

 .25

 .23

 .28

 .25

 .23

 .22

 .05

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .60

 1.77

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

APRIL 2018 RUN DATE: 05/07/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -1.30 9,715 7,286 2,886 201 4.99 2.37

ACRE-FEET -1,300 19,270 14,452 5,724 399

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 5,724

OUTLET

TOTAL

 14,452

 20,176

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.37

JULY 1, 2017 9.58

 48.85

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 9.50
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rodolfo Martinez VALDEZ, also known as Mario Estrada, also known as Hector A. Martinez, also known as Flabiano Ortiz-Valdez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50767.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western *670District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rodolfo Martinez Valdez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47:5.4.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Tyrick PATTERSON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-4992.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 27, 2006.

Decided March 6, 2006.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank DeArmon Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tyrick Patterson pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000). Initially, the district court overruled Patterson’s objections to the guideline calculation based on *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and sentenced him to a term of twenty-one months imprisonment. On appeal, Patterson argued that, the district court erred in imposing sentence under a mandatory guideline scheme. Without filing a brief, the government moved to vacate the sentence and remand the case to the district court for resentencing in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). We granted the motion and Patterson was resentenced to a term of nineteen months imprisonment. Patterson has not identified any error in the sentence imposed on remand.

We therefore affirm the sentence imposed by the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 538.62

 539.10

 539.61

 540.11

 540.60

 541.08

 541.56

 542.08

 542.56

 543.02

 543.04

 543.04

 543.04

 543.04

 543.02

 542.99

 542.98

 542.97

 542.97

 542.97

 542.98

 543.14

 543.24

 543.27

 543.28

 543.26

 543.22

 543.21

 543.18

 543.15

 543.14

 1,972,446

 1,978,490

 1,984,919

 1,991,229

 1,997,419

 2,003,489

 2,009,566

 2,016,157

 2,022,247

 2,028,090

 2,028,344

 2,028,344

 2,028,344

 2,028,344

 2,028,090

 2,027,708

 2,027,581

 2,027,454

 2,027,454

 2,027,454

 2,027,581

 2,029,615

 2,030,886

 2,031,267

 2,031,395

 2,031,140

 2,030,632

 2,030,505

 2,030,123

 2,029,742

 2,029,615

STORAGE

+4,152

+6,044

+6,429

+6,310

+6,190

+6,070

+6,077

+6,591

+6,090

+5,843

+254

+0

+0

+0

-254

-382

-127

-127

+0

+0

+127

+2,034

+1,271

+381

+128

-255

-508

-127

-382

-381

-127

CHANGE

3,228

3,508

3,484

3,474

3,460

3,460

3,467

3,470

3,452

3,419

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

870

580

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

PUMPING

 690

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 7

 5

 6

 4

 6

 10

 17

 20

 12

 21

 25

 23

 21

 23

 25

 23

 10

 7

 8

 6

 7

 5

 62

 127

 135

 144

 136

 130

 124

 84

 31

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-438

-457

-237

-289

-333

-390

-386

-128

-370

-453

+153

+23

+21

+23

-103

-170

-54

-57

+8

+6

+71

+1,030

-167

-261

+200

+15

-120

+62

-69

-108

-33

OR

 45

 33

 61

 37

 20

 53

 25

 45

 49

 53

 74

 66

 78

 107

 107

 78

 111

 62

 25

 29

 58

 33

 70

 62

 62

 62

 62

 58

 99

 53

 95

C.F.S.

 .11

 .08

 .15

 .09

 .05

 .13

 .06

 .11

 .12

 .13

 .18

 .16

 .19

 .26

 .26

 .19

 .27

 .15

 .06

 .07

 .14

 .08

 .17

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .14

 .24

 .13

 .23

INCHES

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .42

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .06

 .22

 .62

 .69

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR May 12, 2005

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2005 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +61,321 35,876 690 1,264 0 -3,011 1,872 4.55 2.13

ACRE-FEET +61,321 71,160 1,369 2,507 0 -5,972 3,713

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 1,369

PACHECO TUNNEL 2,507 TOTAL 3,876

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2004 TO DATE = 12.67

 1,968,294

SPILL 0 2.13

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
### §9531. Exception relating to activities of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration

#### (a) In general

This chapter and the amendments made by this Act shall not apply with respect to activities of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

#### (b) Rule of construction

Nothing in this chapter or the amendments made by this Act shall be construed to authorize the imposition of any sanction or other condition, limitation, restriction, or prohibition, that directly or indirectly impedes the supply by any entity of the Russian Federation of any product or service, or the procurement of such product or service by any contractor or subcontractor of the United States or any other entity, relating to or in connection with any space launch conducted for—

(1) the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; or

(2) any other non-Department of Defense customer.

(Pub. L. 115–44, title II, §237, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 922.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "This Act" and was translated as reading "This title", meaning title II of Pub. L. 115–44, Aug. 2, 2017, 131 Stat. 898, known as the Countering Russian Influence in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title II to the Code, see section 201 of Pub. L. 115–44, set out as a Short Title note under section 9501 of this title and Tables.