alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §888. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–707, title V, §511(a)(1), Sept. 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 800

Section, acts Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title IV, §443, 60 Stat. 1006; Apr. 5, 1955, ch. 23, §3, 69 Stat. 24, related to salary differentials for Foreign Service officers, Reserve officers, and staff officers. See section 5921 et seq. of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Frederick Sanders, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58393;

First District (4th Division) —

July 11, 1973.

James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

*286Mr. JUSTICE ADESKO

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant, Frederick Sanders, was charged with the offenses of armed robbery and attempted robbery. He pleaded guilty to armed robbery and after a bench trial he was found guilty of attempted robbery and sentenced to concurrent terms of two to five years. Defendant, represented by the Public Defender, filed a consolidated notice of appeal. The Public Defender now seeks to withdraw as counsel in the armed robbery cause. He has filed a motion pursuant to *Anders v.*California, 386 U.S. 738, and states that, from a review of the record, the only basis for an appeal would be whether the plea of guilty was properly accepted by the trial court. The Public Defender concludes that in view of the trial court’s strict adherence to Supreme Corut Rule 402 in accepting the guilty plea, an appeal in this cause would be without merit and could not possibly be successful.

Defendant received a copy of the Public Defender’s motion to withdraw and a copy of the supporting brief. He was also sent a letter by this court notifying him of the motion and giving him an opportunity to file any points he might choose to support his appeal. Defendant failed to respond.

After examining the points raised by the Public Defender’s brief as well as the entire record before the court, we are compelled to conclude that this appeal would be wholly frivolous and without merit. The motion of the Public Defender to withdraw from the instant appeal is therefore allowed and the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County is hereby affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

BURMAN, P. J., and DIERINGER, J., concur.
Exhibit 13.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 20-F of eFuture Information Technology Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Adam Yan, certify that:


(1) This annual report containing the financial statements fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of eFuture Information Technology Inc.





Date: June 27, 2011/s/ Adam YanAdam YanChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Warren S. Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Director of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties,
Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Warren S. Hoffman                                                                                      
|Warren S. Hoffman Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Managing General Partner November 13, 2006
§ 670.991 How does Job Corps ensure that complaints or disputes are resolved in a timely fashion? ( a ) If a complaint is not resolved by the center operator or service provider in the time frames described in § 670.990, the person making the complaint may request that the Regional Director determine whether reasonable cause exists to believe that the Act or regulations for this part of the Act have been violated. The request must be filed with the Regional Director within 60 days from the date that the center operator or service provider should have issued the decision.
( b ) Following the receipt of a request for review under paragraph (a) of this section, the Regional Director must determine within 60 days whether there has been a violation of the Act or the WIA regulations. If the Regional Director determines that there has been a violation of the Act or Regulations, (s)he may direct the operator or service provider to remedy the violation or direct the service provider to issue a decision to resolve the dispute according to the service provider's grievance procedures. If the service provider does not comply with the Regional Director's decision within 30 days, the Regional Director may impose a sanction on the center operator or service provider for violating the Act or regulations, and/or for failing to issue a decision. Decisions imposing sanctions upon a center operator or service provider may be appealed to the DOL Office of Administrative Law Judges under 20 CFR 667.800 or 667.840.
### §290k. Acceptance of membership

The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Agency") provided for by the Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Convention") deposited in the archives of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (hereinafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Bank").

(Pub. L. 100–202, §101(e) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–131, 1329–134.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 403 of title IV of H.R. 3750, One Hundredth Congress, as introduced Dec. 11, 1987, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–202.

Section 402 of title IV of H.R. 3750, as introduced Dec. 11, 1987, and as enacted into law by section 101(e) [title I] of Pub. L. 100–202, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] shall be codified as subchapter XXVI of chapter 7 of title 22 of the United States Code."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Section 401 of title IV of H.R. 3750, as introduced Dec. 11, 1987, and as enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–202, §101(e) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–131, 1329–134, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency Act'."
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 152

 167

 170

 163

 147

 113

 109

 109

 117

 130

 142

 149

 169

 211

 199

 231

 235

 200

 207

 194

 140

 135

 121

 143

 173

 191

 210

 255

 395

 462

 391

 72

 80

 73

 72

 79

 79

 88

 78

 76

 78

 80

 79

 77

 79

 74

 77

 81

 75

 87

 83

 84

 87

 72

 83

 80

 80

 80

 82

 84

 88

 81

 94

 98

 100

 99

 99

 95

 96

 94

 94

 92

 97

 96

 100

 111

 108

 109

 109

 108

 115

 113

 103

 98

 95

 100

 103

 108

 110

 120

 148

 155

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 1, 2008

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
[Cite as State v. Sears , 2024

- Ohio

- 126.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

CLERMONT COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO

,

Appellee,

- vs

-

DAVID JAMES SEARS

,

Appell ant

. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA 2023

- 09

- 063

D E C I S I O N

1/16/2024

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLERMONT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

Case No. 2023 CR 000191

Mark J. Tekulve, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, and Nick Horton , Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

W. Stephen Haynes, Clermont County Public Defender, and Robe r t F. Benintendi, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant

.

Per Curiam

.

{¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, David James Sears , the transcript of the docke t and journal entries, the

tran script of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common

Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.Clermont CA20 2 3

- 09

- 0 63

- 2

- {¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967)

, which (1) indicates that a careful review

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated;

(2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders , at 744, 87

S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independent ly t o determine

whether the proceed ings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of

appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for

appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of

both the brief and motion to withdraw have been serve d upon appellant.

{¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel

for appella nt requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed

for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

S. POWELL , P.J., PIPER and BYRNE

, J J., concur.

NOTICE TO THE CLERK:

Serve a copy of this decision upon appellant at: David James Sears, # A818253

, London Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 69

, London, OH 43140[Cite as State v. Sears , 2024

- Ohio

- 126.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 722.48

 722.60

 722.76

 722.92

 720.34

 720.60

 720.76

 720.90

 721.02

 721.14

 721.24

 721.38

 721.50

 721.61

 721.80

 721.95

 722.09

 722.21

 722.36

 722.58

 722.74

 723.23

 720.23

 721.63

 722.04

 722.30

 722.50

 722.69

 722.87

 723.02

 1,277

 1,281

 1,287

 1,293

 1,198

 1,208

 1,213

 1,218

 1,223

 1,227

 1,231

 1,236

 1,241

 1,245

 1,252

 1,257

 1,262

 1,267

 1,272

 1,280

 1,286

 1,305

 1,194

 1,245

 1,260

 1,270

 1,278

 1,285

 1,291

 1,297

STORAGE

+6

+4

+6

+6

-95

+10

+5

+5

+5

+4

+4

+5

+5

+4

+7

+5

+5

+5

+5

+8

+6

+19

-111

+51

+15

+10

+8

+7

+6

+6

CHANGE

5

4

5

5

-5

7

5

5

5

4

4

5

6

5

7

6

6

5

5

6

5

12

0

29

11

8

7

7

6

6

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 2

 2

 2

 43

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 56

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2011 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 1, 2011

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +26 186 0 167

ACRE-FEET +26 369 0 331

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 331

 331

 1,271

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
#### Robert I. Buchholz, Appellant-Respondent, v. United States Fire Insurance Company, Respondent-Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ. [See post, p. 709.]
### §9531. Establishment

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Institute a National Center for Education Research (in this part referred to as the "Research Center").

#### (b) Mission

The mission of the Research Center is—

(1) to sponsor sustained research that will lead to the accumulation of knowledge and understanding of education, to—

(A) ensure that all children have access to a high-quality education;

(B) improve student academic achievement, including through the use of educational technology;

(C) close the achievement gap between high-performing and low-performing students through the improvement of teaching and learning of reading, writing, mathematics, science, and other academic subjects; and

(D) improve access to, and opportunity for, postsecondary education;

(2) to support the synthesis and, as appropriate, the integration of education research;

(3) to promote quality and integrity through the use of accepted practices of scientific inquiry to obtain knowledge and understanding of the validity of education theories, practices, or conditions; and

(4) to promote scientifically valid research findings that can provide the basis for improving academic instruction and lifelong learning.

(Pub. L. 107–279, title I, §131, Nov. 5, 2002, 116 Stat. 1954.)
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1






                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of California Beach Restaurants, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan Redhead, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                             /s/  Alan Redhead
         ------------------------------------------------------
         Alan Redhead
         Chief Executive Officer
         & Chief Financial Officer
         September 13, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**TERRENCE E. BABB, M.D.,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**CENTRE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL;**
**GEISINGER CLINIC; PENN STATE GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM; ROBIN**  **E. OLIVER, M.D.; AND MICHAEL**
**CHMIELEWSKI, M.D.,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 516 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

          - [CBP Dec. 12-09]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Announcement of the quota quantity of tuna in airtight containers for Calendar Year 2012; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of April 17, 2012, a document concerning tariff rates for tuna in airtight containers for Calendar Year 2012. Inadvertently, no CBP Decision Number was listed in the heading of that document. This document corrects the April 17, 2012 document to reflect that the CBP Decision Number is 12-09 as set forth above.                    

# DATES:

*Effective Dates:*                         This correction is effective May 1, 2012. The 2012 tariff- rate quota is applicable to tuna fish entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period January 1, through December 31, 2012.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ryan Olden, Regulations and Rulings, Office of International Trade, (202) 325-0009.

## Correction

In notice document, FR Doc. 2012-9131, beginning on page 22796 in the issue of Tuesday, April 17, 2012, make the following correction in the third column:

                        Insert “CBP Dec. 12-09” into the heading of the document between the                               ( print page 25733)                            agency name, “U.S. Customs and Border Protection,” and the title of the document, “Tuna—Tariff-Rate Quota; the Tariff-Rate Quota for Calendar Year 2012 Tuna Classifiable under Subheading 1604.14.22, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS).”                    

Dated: April 25, 2012.

Harold M. Singer,

Director, Regulations and Disclosure Law Division, U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

[FR Doc. 2012-10409 Filed 4-30-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
### §3791. Prescription of measurement rules and rates of tolls

The Commission may, subject to the provisions of this chapter, prescribe and from time to time change—

(1) the rules for the measurement of vessels for the Panama Canal; and

(2) the tolls that shall be levied for use of the Panama Canal.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1601, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 489; Pub. L. 104–106, div. C, title XXXV, §3527, Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 641.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–70, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 452, known as the Panama Canal Act of 1979, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3601 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1996—Pub. L. 104–106 reenacted section catchline without change and amended text generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

"(a) The President is authorized, subject to the provisions of this part, to prescribe and from time to time change—

"(1) the rules for the measurement of vessels for the Panama Canal; and

"(2) the tolls that shall be levied for the use of the Canal.

"(b) Such rules of measurement and tolls prevailing on October 1, 1979, shall continue in effect until changed as provided in this part."
Exhibit 13.1

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, the annual report on Form 20-F of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Silicon Motion Technology Corporation.

Date: April 30, 2013



/s/ Wallace C. KouWallace C. Kou, Chief Executive Officer/s/ Riyadh LaiRiyadh Lai, Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 838.85

 838.62

 838.46

 838.35

 838.34

 838.39

 838.51

 838.55

 838.61

 838.65

 838.69

 838.73

 838.76

 838.78

 838.80

 838.83

 838.85

 838.86

 838.87

 838.86

 838.86

 838.84

 838.85

 838.85

 838.84

 838.84

 838.83

 838.82

 838.81

 838.81

 838.80

 47.64

 47.35

 47.15

 47.01

 47.00

 47.06

 47.21

 47.26

 47.33

 47.38

 47.44

 47.49

 47.52

 47.55

 47.57

 47.61

 47.64

 47.65

 47.66

 47.65

 47.65

 47.62

 47.64

 47.64

 47.62

 47.62

 47.61

 47.60

 47.59

 47.59

 47.57

STORAGE

-0.25

-0.29

-0.20

-0.14

-0.01

+0.06

+0.15

+0.05

+0.08

+0.05

+0.05

+0.05

+0.04

+0.03

+0.03

+0.04

+0.03

+0.01

+0.01

-0.01

+0.00

-0.03

+0.01

+0.00

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

-0.01

-0.01

+0.00

-0.01

CHANGE

59

40

84

56

83

74

126

73

86

73

75

77

69

61

62

69

64

59

57

45

50

35

54

50

44

50

42

40

41

48

40

INFLOW

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

SPILL

 159

 159

 159

 98

 62

 15

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

 23

OUTLET

 17

 16

 16

 17

 18

 17

 17

 15

 15

 15

 16

 19

 17

 15

 16

 17

 18

 19

 18

 18

 17

 15

 15

 17

 17

 17

 16

 14

 14

 15

 14

C.F.S.

 .42

 .41

 .41

 .43

 .45

 .44

 .42

 .38

 .38

 .38

 .40

 .48

 .42

 .37

 .40

 .42

 .46

 .47

 .45

 .44

 .42

 .37

 .37

 .43

 .42

 .42

 .39

 .36

 .36

 .38

 .36

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-ORLAND PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2010 RUN DATE: 08/26/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -.29 1,886 1,227 310 507 12.71 .00

ACRE-FEET -290 3,741 2,434 615 1,006

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

DATA BASED ON 24 HOUR PERIOD ENDING 0800 HOURS.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 615

OUTLET

TOTAL

 2,434

 3,049

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2010 .00

 47.89

STONY GORGE RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS