alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 5, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-2807

Lower Tribunal No. 16-21953

________________

Patrick G. Foster,

Appellant,

vs.

Monique S. Chong,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Abby Cynamon,

Judge.

Cain & Snihur, LLP, and May L. Cain, for appellant.

Law Offices of Kenneth M. Kaplan, and Kenneth M. Kaplan, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and LUCK, JJ.

SCALES, J.

Appellant Patrick G. Foster, the petitioner below, appeals a “Final Judgment

of Paternity, Time Sharing/Paternity Plan.” Specifically, Foster challenges the
Final Judgment on five grounds. Because (i) we are unable to conclude that the

trial court’s computation of Foster’s child support obligation is supported by

competent substantial evidence; and (ii) the Final Judgment neglects to order

shared parental responsibility, we reverse and remand for further proceedings on

these two issues, but otherwise affirm the Final Judgment.

Appellee Monique S. Chong, the respondent below, and Foster are the

parents of a daughter born in 2011. After Chong and Foster separated in late 2012,

Foster voluntarily paid $500 per month in child support, not pursuant to a court

order. Foster ceased these monthly payments when Chong left Florida with their

daughter and moved to Georgia without notifying Foster. In 2016, Foster filed the

instant petition seeking a determination of paternity, timesharing and child support.

After conducting a trial on the petition, the trial court entered a Final

Judgment that: (i) determined it was in the best interests of the child to reside with

Chong; (ii) outlined the parties’ timesharing of the child; and (iii) required Foster

to pay $1286 per month for child support. Foster appealed the Final Judgment.

The trial court made no written or oral findings to describe how it arrived at

Foster’s child support obligation, and therefore, the record is unclear as to whether

this amount comports with the allocation requirements of chapter 61 of the Florida

Statutes. As a result, we are unable to conclude that the child support award of

$1268 is supported by competent substantial evidence and are compelled to

2
reverse. See Van Exter v. Diodonet-Molina, 152 So. 3d 699, 701 (Fla. 3d DCA

2014); see also Ondrejack v. Ondrejack, 839 So. 2d 867, 871-72 (Fla. 4th DCA

2003) (holding that trial court must consider all appropriate statutory factors in

determining child support and make specific findings therefor).

Additionally, the Final Judgment suggests, but does not establish with the

necessary precision, that Chong and Foster will share parental responsibility. The

trial court is required to order shared parental responsibility unless it finds that

shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child. § 61.13(2)(c)2.,

Fla. Stat. (2017); Aranda v. Padilla, 216 So. 3d 652, 653 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part and remanded for further proceedings

consistent with this opinion.

3
### §6106. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "agency of the United States Government" includes any agency of the legislative branch and any court of the judicial branch as well as any agency of the executive branch;

(2) the term "agency head" means—

(A) in the case of the executive branch of Government or an agency of the legislative branch other than the House of Representatives or the Senate, the head of the respective agency;

(B) in the case of the judicial branch of Government, the chief judge of the respective court;

(C) in the case of the Senate, the President pro tempore, in consultation with the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the Senate; and

(D) in the case of the House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House, in consultation with the Majority Leader and Minority Leader of the House;

(3) the term "Center" means the Mansfield Center for Pacific Affairs; and

(4) the term "detailee" means an employee of an agency of the United States Government on assignment or loan to the Mansfield Center for Pacific Affairs without a change of position from the agency by which he or she is employed.

(Pub. L. 103–236, title II, §257, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 432.)
§ 680.200 What are training services for adults and dislocated workers? Types of training services are listed in WIOA sec. 134(c)(3)(D) and in paragraphs (a) through (k) of this section. This list is not all-inclusive and additional training services may be provided. ( a ) Occupational skills training, including training for nontraditional employment;
( b ) On-the-job training (OJT) (*see* §§ 680.700, 680.710, 680.720, and 680.730);
( c ) Incumbent worker training, in accordance with WIOA sec. 134(d)(4) and §§ 680.780, 680.790, 680.800, 680.810, and 680.820;
( d ) Programs that combine workplace training with related instruction, which may include cooperative education programs;
( e ) Training programs operated by the private sector;
( f ) Skills upgrading and retraining;
( g ) Entrepreneurial training;
( h ) Transitional jobs in accordance with WIOA sec 134(d)(5) and §§ 680.190 and 680.195;
( i ) Job readiness training provided in combination with services listed in paragraphs (a) through (h) of this section;
( j ) Adult education and literacy activities, including activities of English language acquisition and integrated education and training programs, provided concurrently or in combination with training services listed in paragraphs (a) through (g) of this section; and
( k ) Customized training conducted with a commitment by an employer or group of employers to employ an individual upon successful completion of the training (*see* §§ 680.760 and 680.770).
|   | (i) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Form      10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.      78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dated:      March 12, 2010 |
|--------|----------------------------|

|                         |
|------------------------------|
| /S/ Matthew S.      Porter   |
| Matthew      S. Porter       |
| Chief      Financial Officer |
October 3, 2012

Mr. Steve Page Director Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

### Re: VOC Petition for 2·Amino·2·methyl-1-propanol (AMP) Dear Mr. Page: The Dow Chemical Company 1500 E . Lake Cook Road Buffalo Grove. IL 60089 Un1tod States of America

The Dow Chemical Company submits the enclosed petition to request that EPA exempt 2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) from regulation as a volatile organic compound (VOC) by excluding it from the definition of VOC found at 40 CFR 51.1OO(s). AMP meets the criteria that have been used to grant prior VOC petitions. Specifically, the current maximum incremental reactivity (MIR) value for AMP is below the MIR value of the benchmark chemical ethane. The MIR value, in fact, is negative under many conditions, meaning that the presence of AMP inhibits ozone formation under those conditions . AMP also has very low volatility, such that less than 100 percent of emitted AMP is available to contribute to ozone formation. AMP is used to disperse pigments in water-based coatings and has significant performance advantages compared to available substitute materials. AMP is not a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) under Title III of the Clean Air Act and is not listed as a toxic chemical under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-toKnow Act (EPCRA) . Dow Chemical respectfully requests prompt action on this petition. Manufacturers and formulators of water-based coatings need access to AMP to meet VOC limits on their products without impairing the performance of their products. Thank you for your consideration of this petition . Questions may be directed to me via e-mail at: jfedders@dow .com or by phone at 215-592-3103 . Sincerely,

# ~~~ Jon Fedders North American Industrial Commercial Director cc: Dave Sanders
### §3222. Uranium enrichment capacity

The Secretary of Energy is directed to initiate construction planning and design, construction, and operation activities for expansion of uranium enrichment capacity, as elsewhere provided by law. Further the Secretary as well as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Secretary of State are directed to establish and implement procedures which will ensure to the maximum extent feasible, consistent with this chapter, orderly processing of subsequent arrangements and export licenses with minimum time delay.

(Pub. L. 95–242, title I, §102, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 122; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1225(e)(2), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–775.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–242, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 120, known as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3201 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–277 substituted "and the Secretary of State" for ", the Secretary of State, and the Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 10, 1978, except as otherwise provided and regardless of any requirements for the promulgation of implementing regulations, see section 603(c) of Pub. L. 95–242, set out as a note under section 3201 of this title.
### §6942. Purpose

The purpose of this part is to authorize additional resources for the agencies and departments engaged in monitoring and enforcement of United States trade agreements and trade laws with respect to the People's Republic of China.

(Pub. L. 106–286, div. B, title IV, §412, Oct. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 901.)
§ 681.220 Who is an “in-school youth”? An ISY is an individual who is: ( a ) Attending school (as defined by State law), including secondary and postsecondary school;
( b ) Not younger than age 14 or (unless an individual with a disability who is attending school under State law) older than age 21 at time of enrollment. Because age eligibility is based on age at enrollment, participants may continue to receive services beyond the age of 21 once they are enrolled in the program;
( c ) A low-income individual; and
( d ) One or more of the following: ( 1 ) Basic skills deficient;
( 2 ) An English language learner;
( 3 ) An offender;
( 4 ) A homeless individual aged 14 to 21 who meets the criteria defined in sec. 41403(6) of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14043e-2(6)), a homeless child or youth aged 14 to 21 who meets the criteria defined in sec. 725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)), or a runaway;
( 5 ) An individual in foster care or who has aged out of the foster care system or who has attained 16 years of age and left foster care for kinship guardianship or adoption, a child eligible for assistance under sec. 477 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 677), or in an out-of-home placement;
( 6 ) An individual who is pregnant or parenting;
( 7 ) An individual with a disability; or
( 8 ) An individual who requires additional assistance to complete an educational program or to secure or hold employment.
November 2022

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE - FEET INFLOW RIVER EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

1,414.2

1 919.02 1,411.3 -2.9 2,216 3,639 0 0 28 0.07 0.01

2 918.95 1,410.4 -1.0 3,091 3,564 0 0 8 0.02 0.45

3 918.85 1,409.0 -1.4 2,720 3,390 0 0 16 0.04 0.00

4 918.63 1,406.0 -3.0 2,446 3,936 0 0 20 0.05 0.00

5 918.38 1,402.6 -3.4 1,998 3,714 0 0 0 0.00 0.15

6 918.22 1,400.5 -2.2 2,512 3,610 0 0 0 0.00 0.10

7 918.15 1,399.5 -1.0 2,906 3,374 0 0 12 0.03 0.66

8 918.24 1,400.7 1.2 4,380 3,746 0 0 16 0.04 1.20

9 918.29 1,401.4 0.7 4,032 3,681 0 0 8 0.02 0.40

10 918.17 1,399.8 -1.6 2,713 3,537 0 0 0 0.00 0.40

11 918.06 1,398.3 -1.5 2,309 3,040 0 0 24 0.06 0.00

12 917.97 1,397.1 -1.2 2,402 2,995 0 0 24 0.06 0.11

13 917.93 1,396.5 -0.5 3,294 3,550 0 0 16 0.04 0.00

14 917.93 1,396.5 0.0 3,258 3,222 0 0 36 0.09 0.00

15 917.92 1,396.4 -0.1 3,175 3,228 0 0 16 0.04 0.00

16 917.82 1,395.0 -1.4 2,370 3,012 0 0 40 0.10 0.00

17 918.01 1,397.6 2.6 4,372 3,016 0 0 60 0.15 0.00

18 917.94 1,396.7 -0.9 2,275 2,728 0 0 24 0.06 0.00

19 917.93 1,396.5 -0.1 2,950 2,926 0 0 92 0.23 0.00

20 918.10 1,398.8 2.3 4,149 2,942 0 0 44 0.11 0.00

21 918.18 1,399.9 1.1 3,557 2,968 0 0 40 0.10 0.00

22 918.23 1,400.6 0.7 3,410 3,039 0 0 28 0.07 0.00

23 918.37 1,402.5 1.9 3,855 2,870 0 0 24 0.06 0.00

24 918.48 1,404.0 1.5 3,756 2,953 0 0 48 0.12 0.00

25 918.62 1,405.9 1.9 4,044 3,027 0 0 56 0.14 0.00

26 918.53 1,404.7 -1.2 2,429 3,003 0 0 44 0.11 0.00

27 918.48 1,404.0 -0.7 2,770 3,109 0 0 4 0.01 0.00

28 918.57 1,405.2 1.2 3,190 2,544 0 0 28 0.07 0.00

29 918.33 1,402.0 -3.3 1,229 2,848 0 0 28 0.07 0.00

30 918.10 1,398.8 -3.1 1,222 2,773 0 0 28 0.07 0.00

TOTALS -15.4 89,030 95,984 0 0 812 2.03 3.48

ACRE-FEET -15,400 176,591 190,384 0 0 1,611

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 190,384 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total 190,384

Precipitation

This month = 3.48

October 01, 2022 To date = 3.48

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Shasta Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/19/2023
§ 679.230 What are the general procedural requirements for designation of local areas? As part of the process of designating or redesignating a local area, the Governor must develop a policy for designation of local areas that must include: ( a ) Consultation with the State WDB;
( b ) Consultation with the chief elected officials and affected Local WDBs; and
( c ) Consideration of comments received through a public comment process which must: ( 1 ) Offer adequate time for public comment prior to designation of the local area; and
( 2 ) Provide an opportunity for comment by representatives of Local WDBs, chief elected officials, businesses, institutions of higher education, labor organizations, other primary stakeholders, and the general public regarding the designation of the local area.
### §4715. Compliance with Congressional Budget Act

Any authority provided by this chapter to enter into contracts shall be effective only—

(1) to the extent that the budget authority for the obligation to make outlays, which is created by the contract, has been provided in advance by an appropriation Act; or

(2) to the extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts.

(Pub. L. 99–93, title VI, §615, Aug. 16, 1985, 99 Stat. 444.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Congressional Budget Act, referred to in section catchline, probably means the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, titles I through IX of Pub. L. 93–344, July 12, 1974, 88 Stat. 297. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 621 of Title 2, The Congress, and Tables.
§ 30.301 May subpoenas be issued for witnesses and documents in connection with a claim under Part B of EEOICPA? ( a ) In connection with the adjudication of a claim under Part B of EEOICPA, an OWCP district office and/or a FAB reviewer may, at their own initiative, issue subpoenas for the attendance and testimony of witnesses, and for the production of books, electronic records, correspondence, papers or other relevant documents. Subpoenas will only be issued for documents if they are relevant and cannot be obtained by other means, and for witnesses only where oral testimony is the best way to ascertain the facts.
( b ) A claimant may also request a subpoena in connection with his or her claim under Part B of the Act, but such request may only be made to a FAB reviewer. No subpoenas will be issued at the request of the claimant under any other portion of the claims process. The decision to grant or deny such request is within the discretion of the FAB reviewer. To request a subpoena under this section, the requestor must: ( 1 ) Submit the request in writing and send it to the FAB reviewer as early as possible, but no later than 30 days (as evidenced by postmark or other carrier's date marking) after the date of the original hearing request;
( 2 ) Explain why the testimony or evidence is directly relevant and material to the issues in the case; and
( 3 ) Establish that a subpoena is the best method or opportunity to obtain such evidence because there are no other means by which the documents or testimony could have been obtained.
( c ) No subpoena will be issued for attendance of employees or contractors of OWCP or NIOSH acting in their official capacities as decision-makers or policy administrators. For hearings taking the form of a review of the written record, no subpoena for the appearance of witnesses will be considered.
( d ) The FAB reviewer will issue the subpoena under his or her own name. It may be served in person or by certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the person to be served at his or her last known principal place of business or residence. A decision to deny a subpoena requested by a claimant can only be challenged as part of a request for reconsideration of any adverse decision of the FAB which results from the hearing.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006, as amended at 84 FR 3050, Feb. 8, 2019]
#### § 422.401 What is the scope of this subpart?

This subpart describes the procedures relating to our use of administrative wage garnishment under 31 U.S.C. 3720D to recover past due debts that you owe.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.53

 130.72

 130.37

 130.29

 130.38

 130.30

 130.46

 130.36

 130.44

 130.32

 130.33

 130.46

 130.33

 130.24

 130.46

 130.55

 130.29

 130.30

 130.43

 130.59

 130.76

 130.68

 130.77

 130.77

 130.75

 130.70

 130.53

 130.53

 130.61

 130.54

 130.54

 636

 658

 620

 611

 621

 612

 629

 619

 627

 614

 615

 629

 615

 605

 629

 639

 611

 612

 626

 643

 663

 654

 664

 664

 662

 656

 636

 636

 645

 637

 637

STORAGE

+17

+22

-38

-9

+10

-9

+17

-10

+8

-13

+1

+14

-14

-10

+24

+10

-28

+1

+14

+17

+20

-9

+10

+0

-2

-6

-20

+0

+9

-8

+0

CHANGE

507

478

420

436

363

346

342

305

315

340

379

393

382

399

433

446

466

475

464

467

457

441

458

457

467

459

478

504

509

471

446

INFLOW

 360

 296

 250

 228

 147

 133

 125

 75

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 137

 169

 187

 212

 210

 217

 207

 234

 267

 303

 334

 342

 344

 360

 377

 397

 436

 430

 412

 413

 402

 401

 408

 412

 424

 418

 444

 460

 460

 431

 402

PUTAH

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .28

 .53

 .45

 .18

 .37

 .38

 .32

 .27

 .36

 .35

 .30

 .30

 .40

 .25

 .30

 .28

 .22

 .34

 .41

 .39

 .43

 .39

 .44

 .42

 .30

 .28

 .26

 .28

 .34

 .27

 .21

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 RUN DATE: 06/01/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +18 13,303 10,650 2,603 40 10.30 .01

ACRE-FEET +18 26,387 21,124 5,163 79

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 5,163

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 21,124

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2016 45.53

 619

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 45.53
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 23272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9997]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 23272]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


FY 2011 Emergency Food Assistance Annual Program Statement

    Pursuant to the Food for Peace Act of 2008 and the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), notice is hereby given that the FY 2011 
Emergency Food Assistance Annual Program Statement is available to 
interested parties for general viewing.
    For individuals who wish to review, the FY 2011 Emergency Food 
Assistance Annual Program Statement is available via the Food for Peace 
Web site: http://www.usaid.gov/our_work/humanitarian_assistance/ffp/emergency.html on or about April 18, 2011. Interested parties can also 
receive a copy of the FY 2011 Emergency Food Assistance Annual Program 
Statement by contacting the Office of Food for Peace, U.S. Agency for 
International Development, RRB 7.06-152, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20523-7600.

Juli Majernik,
Grants Manager, Policy and Technical Division, Office of Food for 
Peace, Bureau for Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2011-9997 Filed 4-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 619.3 Data exchange standardization for SIDES. ( a ) XML is the data exchange standard for SIDES.
( b ) This standard applies to any Federally-funded SIDES consortium, and any future agents of the Department providing vendor services for the development, maintenance, support, and operations of the SIDES, and for any State that adopts SIDES. A SIDES consortium involves a group of two or more States jointly establishing a project team to oversee the design, development, and implementation of a new SIDES data exchange module. As States implement SIDES or new data exchange modules of SIDES, they must conform to this data exchange standard by application design.
( c ) XML is designated as the data exchange standard to govern the reporting of information through SIDES data exchange modules. The regulation applies to current SIDES data exchange modules and any future SIDES data exchange modules developed with Federal funds.
( d ) The standard designated in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section is effective March 21, 2014.