alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07 -018 5-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A MA Y19, 2008

_________

_________

_________

___ ORLIN ANARIBA , APPE LLA NT

V. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 29 9 T H DI ST RI CTCOU RTOF T RAVI S CO UNT Y; NO . D -1 -D C- 06- 301571; H ON ORABLE CH AR LES F . BA IR D, JU DG E

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Appel lan t appeal s his conv icti on for ag g ra v ated ass aul t, enhanc ed by on e prior ag g ra v ated ass aul t, and s ubseq uent sent ence of eig ht y e a rs confine ment i n the In s ti tu ti on al D i v i s i on , TexasD ep ar tm en t of C r i mi na l J us ti c e. W e affi r m. A p p e ll a n t ’s a tt o rn e y h a s f il e d a n A n d e rs b ri e f a n d a m o t io n t o wit h d ra w. An d e rs v. Cal ifor nia , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct . 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967)
. In suppor t of his moti on to w it hdraw , couns el cer ti fies that he hasdi li g entl y rev iewed th e record, an d i n hi s o pin ion , the record reflects n o rev ersi ble er ro r upon w hic h an appeal ca n be predi cat ed. Id. at 74 4-2

45. In c ompli ance w it h H ig h v . Stat e, 573 S.W .2d 807, 813 ( Tex .C ri m.App. 1978) , c ounse l has candi dly

disc uss ed w hy , under the cont ro ll ing authori ti es, there isno er ro r in the t ri al cour t’ s j udg ment. Addi ti onal ly , c ounse l has cer ti fied th at he has prov ide d appell ant a co py of the And ers b ri ef and moti on tow it hdraw and appropr iat ely adv is ed appe ll ant o f his r ig ht to fil e a pro serespon se in t h is m a tt er . Stafford v . St ate, 813 S. W .2d 5 03, 5 10 (Tex .C ri m.App. 1991)
. The cour t hasal so a d vise d appel lan t of hi s r ig ht t o fil e a pro se re spons e. Appel lan t hasnot filed a respon se. By his And ers brief , coun sel raises groun ds tha t could p ossibly sup port an app eal, but concl udes the a ppeal i s fr ivolo us. W e have rev iewe d t h e se g ro unds and made an inde pe nd en t rev i ew

o f t he e nt i re rec ord tod et er mi ne w he th er t he re are an y

a rg uable g ro unds w hic h mig ht s uppor t an appeal
. See P enson v . O hio , 488 U .S. 75, 1 09 S. Ct . 346 , 1 0 2 L
. E d
. 2 d 3 0 0 ( 1 9 8 8 ) ; B l e d s o e v . S t a t e , 1 7 8 S
. W. 3 d 8 2 4 ( T e x . C r i m . A p p . 2 0 0 5 )
. W e have foun d no such arguable groun ds and agree w ith coun sel tha t the app eal is f rivolou s. Accordin gly , coun sel’s mot ion to w ithdra w is hereby g rante d an d t he trial cou rt’s jud g ment i s a ff ir med.
Mackey K. Hancock Justice
Do not p ubl is h.
§ 640.2 Federal law requirements. ( a ) *Conformity.* Section 303(a)(1) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 503(a)(1), requires that a State law include provision for: Such methods of administration * * * as are found by the Secretary of Labor to be reasonably calculated to insure full payment of unemployment compensation when due.
( b ) *Compliance.* Section 303(b)(2) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 503(b)(2), provides in part that:
Whenever the Secretary of Labor, after reasonable notice and opportunity for hearing to the State agency charged with the administration of the State law, finds that in the administration of the law there is: (1) * * * (2) a failure to comply substantially with any provision specified in subsection (a) of this section; the Secretary of Labor shall notify such State agency that further payments will not be made to the State until the Secretary of Labor is satisfied that there is no longer any such * * * failure to comply. Until he is so satisfied, he shall make no further certification to the Secretary of the Treasury with respect to such State * * *.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Detailed stratigraphic description of the JOIDES cores on 
the continental margin off Florida

#### Professional Paper 581-D

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp581D 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:54
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4427 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4427

             To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2016

  Mr. Pompeo (for himself, Mr. Hudson, and Mr. Mullin) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To amend section 203 of the Federal Power Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF FACILITY MERGER AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 203(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 
824b(a)(1)(B)) is amended by striking ``such facilities or any part 
thereof'' and inserting ``such facilities, or any part thereof, of a 
value in excess of $10,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 484.09

 484.91

 485.99

 487.50

 488.23

 489.44

 490.74

 492.08

 493.03

 494.33

 495.63

 496.53

 497.72

 498.47

 499.30

 500.38

 501.47

 502.58

 503.14

 503.98

 504.87

 506.01

 506.68

 507.37

 508.35

 509.08

 510.02

 510.96

 511.96

 512.67

 513.43

 1,328,944

 1,337,970

 1,349,888

 1,366,611

 1,374,720

 1,388,197

 1,402,726

 1,417,755

 1,428,442

 1,443,111

 1,457,831

 1,468,051

 1,481,601

 1,490,163

 1,499,658

 1,512,043

 1,524,577

 1,537,378

 1,543,850

 1,553,575

 1,563,902

 1,577,164

 1,584,976

 1,593,035

 1,604,505

 1,613,068

 1,624,116

 1,635,191

 1,647,000

 1,655,403

 1,664,413

STORAGE

+12,404

+9,026

+11,918

+16,723

+8,109

+13,477

+14,529

+15,029

+10,687

+14,669

+14,720

+10,220

+13,550

+8,562

+9,495

+12,385

+12,534

+12,801

+6,472

+9,725

+10,327

+13,262

+7,812

+8,059

+11,470

+8,563

+11,048

+11,075

+11,809

+8,403

+9,010

CHANGE

6,455

4,865

6,412

8,921

4,559

7,370

7,969

8,232

5,840

7,883

7,878

5,629

7,044

4,765

5,284

6,596

6,535

6,977

3,603

5,466

5,546

7,277

4,365

4,242

6,498

4,866

6,120

6,183

6,499

5,076

4,941

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 137

 153

 181

 181

 184

 182

 185

 186

 198

 205

 206

 196

 193

 171

 158

 150

 149

 150

 149

 151

 151

 156

 160

 158

 168

 205

 223

 231

 234

 231

 200

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-65

-161

-222

-309

-286

-393

-459

-469

-255

-282

-251

-281

-20

-277

-338

-203

-67

-373

-191

-412

-189

-435

-266

-21

-548

-344

-327

-368

-311

-608

-199

OR

 0

 0

 0

 36

 14

 14

 7

 7

 22

 18

 15

 11

 7

 4

 4

 4

 7

 7

 7

 8

 0

 19

 15

 11

 15

 30

 23

 0

 19

 19

 38

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .00

 .08

 .06

 .00

 .05

 .05

 .10

INCHES

 .20

 .26

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR February 12, 2004

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2004 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +347,873 189,896 0 5,582 0 -8,930 381 .95 .82

ACRE-FEET +347,873 376,659 0 11,072 0 -17,713 756

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 11,072 TOTAL 11,072

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2003 TO DATE = 5.25

 1,316,540

SPILL 0 .82

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 14,063

 13,161

 12,032

 12,841

 14,464

 15,226

 14,936

 14,663

 14,407

 15,270

 15,245

 13,610

 12,958

 14,606

 15,599

 17,037

 18,169

 16,881

 16,646

 16,283

 16,828

 16,837

 16,366

 15,860

 15,193

 12,297

 9,159

 8,086

 8,569

 8,820

 8,622

 6,351

 5,551

 4,413

 4,671

 5,115

 5,482

 5,310

 5,234

 5,048

 5,256

 5,566

 5,759

 4,976

 5,542

 7,075

 8,142

 9,827

 8,711

 7,291

 6,350

 5,830

 5,614

 5,378

 5,300

 5,556

 4,611

 3,514

 2,655

 2,469

 2,499

 2,531

 10,015

 8,700

 7,558

 7,793

 8,843

 9,772

 9,831

 9,519

 9,596

 10,160

 10,540

 10,178

 9,827

 11,216

 11,717

 13,066

 13,251

 12,186

 11,402

 10,714

 10,627

 10,467

 10,047

 10,079

 9,568

 7,958

 6,250

 5,217

 4,952

 4,851

 4,734

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 3, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas Sammons, certify that:



1.    I have reviewed this
Amendment No. 1 to annual report on Form 10-K/A of TechPrecision Corporation for the year ended March 31, 2017;



2.    Based on my knowledge,
this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;



|Dated: July 28, 2017 | /s/ Thomas Sammons     
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Thomas Sammons         
|                     | Chief Financial Officer
#### § 680.180 What is an internship or work experience for adults and dislocated workers?

For the purposes of WIOA sec. 134(c)(2)(A)(xii)(VII), an internship or work experience is a planned, structured learning experience that takes place in a workplace for a limited period of time. Internships and other work experience may be paid or unpaid, as appropriate and consistent with other laws, such as the Fair Labor Standards Act. An internship or other work experience may be arranged within the private for profit sector, the non-profit sector, or the public sector. Labor standards apply in any work experience setting where an employee/employer relationship, as defined by the Fair Labor Standards Act, exists. Transitional jobs are a type of work experience, as described in §§ 680.190 and 680.195.
### §§3801, 3802. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3546(a)(2), (3), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2867

Section 3801, Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1701, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 492, related to authority of President to prescribe regulations applicable within areas and installations made available for operation and protection of Panama Canal.

Section 3802, Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1702, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 492, related to authority of Commission to prescribe regulations applicable within areas and installations made available for operation and protection of Panama Canal.
§ 670.955 Are center operators and service providers subject to Federal audits? ( a ) Yes, Center operators and service providers are subject to Federal audits.
( b ) The Secretary arranges for the survey, audit, or evaluation of each Job Corps center and service provider at least once every three years, by Federal auditors or independent public accountants. The Secretary may arrange for more frequent audits. (WIA sec. 159(b)(2).)
( c ) Center operators and other service providers are responsible for giving full cooperation and access to books, documents, papers and records to duly appointed Federal auditors and evaluators. (WIA sec. 159(b)(1).)
### §525. Appropriations and disposition of receipts

(a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from time to time, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the provisions and accomplish the purposes of this subchapter.

(b) All moneys which may be received from the government of any American republic, in payment for any article delivered or service rendered in compliance with the provisions of this subchapter, shall revert to the respective appropriation or appropriations out of which funds were expended in carrying out the transaction for which money is received, and such moneys shall be available for expenditure for the purpose for which such expended funds were appropriated by law, during the fiscal year in which such funds are received and the ensuing fiscal year.

(June 15, 1940, ch. 365, §5, 54 Stat. 397.)
1The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-1695

___________

Marie Grace Gordon, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Eastern

 * District of Missouri. 

Phar-Mor, Inc., *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: January 27, 2000

 Filed: February 1, 2000

___________

Before McMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Marie Grace Gordon appeals from the district court’s1 adverse grant of judgment

as a matter of law in her diversity personal injury action against Phar-Mor, Inc. Ms.

Gordon alleged that she slipped and fell in the checkout lane at a Phar-Mor pharmacy

store after a bottle of liquid dishwashing detergent leaked onto the floor. We affirm.
-2-

Upon de novo review, see Sip-Top, Inc. v. Ekco Group, Inc., 86 F.3d 827, 830

(8th Cir. 1996), we conclude the district court properly granted judgment as a matter

of law to Phar-Mor. We agree with the district court that Ms. Gordon presented

insufficient proof from which a reasonable jury could conclude as required under

Missouri law that Phar-Mor had either actual or constructive notice that the detergent

had leaked onto the floor. See Scheerer v. Hardee’s Food Sys., Inc., 92 F.3d 702, 709

(8th Cir. 1996) (actual notice); Elmore v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 812 S.W.2d 178, 180

(Mo. Ct. App. 1991) (constructive notice). 

We also find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in quashing the

subpoena served on Phar-Mor’s attorney, whose testimony would have been irrelevant

to Phar-Mor’s liability or Ms. Gordon’s damages. Cf. United States v. Jackson, 67

F.3d 1359, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995) (trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting

motion to quash subpoena where testimony would have been irrelevant to defendant’s

factual guilt or innocence), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1192 (1996). Last, we conclude that

the court did not abuse its discretion in excluding proof which Ms. Gordon had not

listed in her pretrial materials, see Radecki v. Joura, 177 F.3d 694, 696 (8th Cir. 1999)

(trial court did not clearly abuse its discretion in granting motion in limine to exclude

expert witness who was not listed prior to pretrial conference), and that Ms. Gordon’s

remaining arguments are meritless. 

Accordingly, we affirm.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Figure 1.3. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the downstream vicinity of 63rd Street.

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 20,110 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 754 feet

94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

0

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

50 100 150 200 METERS

39°00'50"

39°01'10"

39°01'

Hardesty

Avenue

63rd Street

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
Exhibit 10.19


 


Spousal Consent


 


I, Qi Xiao (ID number: 510213198205042044), am the legal spouse
of Haifeng YU (ID number: 410103197407181353) (“My Spouse”). I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree My Spouse
to sign the following documents (the “Transaction Documents”) on September 6, 2018, and agree to dispose of the equity
interest in Chengdu Puyi Bohui Information Technology Co., Ltd. (the “Company”) held by and registered under the name
of My Spouse in accordance with the provisions of the following documents:


 


		(1)	The Equity Pledge Agreement entered into by My Spouse, Puyi Enterprises Management Consulting Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”),
the Company, and other related party;



 


		(2)	The Exclusive Option Agreement entered into by My Spouse, WFOE, the Company, and other related party; and



 


		(3)	The Power of Attorney executed by My Spouse authorizing WFOE to enjoy and exercise his/her rights and obligations raising from
the shareholding of equity interests in the Company.



 


I hereby confirm that I am not entitled to any right with respect
to the equity interest in the Company, and undertake not to raise any claim on the equity interest in the Company. I further confirm
that My Spouse’s performance of the Transaction Documents and further modification or termination of the Transaction Documents
will not require my separate authorization or consent.


 


I hereby undertake to sign all necessary documents and take
all necessary actions to ensure the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) to be properly performed.


 


I hereby agree and undertake that if I obtain any equity interest
in the Company for any reason, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) and abide by the obligations
of the shareholders of the Company under the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time), and for such purpose, once requested
by WFOE or its appointed third party, I shall sign a series of written documents with substantially the same form and content as
the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).


 





	By:	/s/ Qi Xiao	 	By:	/s/ Jianhua Feng
	 	 	 	 	 
	Signatory: Qi Xiao	 	Witness: Jianhua Feng
	Date: September 6, 2018	 	Date: September 6, 2018


 


 


Strictly Confidential
#### Adam Frank v. Rowland & Shafto, Incorporated, and Others.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A1737. MARCUS TUMLINSON v. DARYL DIX, IN HIS OFFICIAL

CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF SPALDING COUNTY, GEORGIA.

Marcus Tumlinson appeals from the trial court’s order dismissing his petition

for a writ of habeas corpus. Although Tumlinson filed his appeal in this Court, he has

moved to transfer the appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court.

Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has exclusive appellate jurisdiction

over all cases involving habeas corpus. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par.

III (4). Tumlinson’s motion to transfer is GRANTED, and this appeal is therefore

TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

May 04, 2020

05/04/2020
§ 668.920 What provisions of law or regulations may not be waived? Requirements relating to: ( a ) Wage and labor standards;
( b ) Worker rights;
( c ) Participation and protection of workers and participants;
( d ) Grievance procedures;
( e ) Judicial review; and
( f ) Non-discrimination may not be waived. (WIA sec. 166(h)(3)(A).)
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Respondent-Appellee, *v.*Bruce Santoro, Petitioner-Appellant.

(No. 57310;

First District (2nd Division) —

June 5, 1973.

*Supplemental opinion upon denial of rehearing August 28,1973.*

Paul Bradley, of Defender Project, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Jones, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (James Veldman and Douglas Cannon, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

PER CURIAM.

DOWNING, J., took no part.