alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 666.240 Under what circumstances may a sanction be applied to a State that fails to achieve negotiated levels of performance for title I? ( a ) If a State fails to meet the negotiated levels of performance agreed to under § 666.120 for core indicators of performance or customer satisfaction indicators for the adult, dislocated worker or youth programs under title I of WIA, the Secretary must, upon request, provide technical assistance, as authorized under WIA sections 136(g) and 170.
( b ) If a State fails to meet the negotiated levels of performance for core indicators of performance or customer satisfaction indicators for the same program in two successive years, the amount of the succeeding year's allocation for the applicable program may be reduced by up to five percent.
( c ) The exact amount of any allocation reduction will be based upon the degree of failure to meet the negotiated levels of performance for core indicators. In making a determination of the amount, if any, of such a sanction, we may consider factors such as: ( 1 ) The State's performance relative to other States;
( 2 ) Improvement efforts underway;
( 3 ) Incremental improvement on the performance measures;
( 4 ) Technical assistance previously provided;
( 5 ) Changes in economic conditions and program design;
( 6 ) The characteristics of participants served compared to the participant characteristics described in the State Plan; and
( 7 ) Performance on other core indicators of performance and customer satisfaction indicators for that program. (WIA sec. 136(g).)
( d ) Only performance that is less than 80 percent of the negotiated levels will be deemed to be a failure to achieve negotiated levels of performance.
( e ) In accordance with 20 CFR 667.300(e), a State grant may be reduced for failure to submit an annual performance progress report.
( f ) A State may request review of a sanction we impose in accordance with the provisions of 20 CFR 667.800.
0.8 0 0.8

Miles

1:50,000

Bureau of Land Management

Glenwood Springs Field Office

Top of Roan Plateau - State of Colorado Proposal

Areas Available for Oil & Gas Development

State's Proposed ACEC with Exceptions

Mechanized Roads

Areas Available for Oil & Gas Development

NO WARRANTY IS MADE BY THE BUREAU OF LAND

MANAGEMENT AS TO THE ACCURACY, RELIABILITY, OR

COMPLETENESS OF THESE DATA FOR INDIVIDUAL USE OR

AGGREGATE USE WITH OTHER DATA
#### § 680.160 How are career services delivered?

Career services must be provided through the one-stop delivery system. Career services may be provided directly by the one-stop operator or through contracts with service providers that are approved by the Local WDB. The Local WDB only may be a provider of career services when approved by the chief elected official and the Governor in accordance with the requirements of WIOA sec. 107(g)(2) and § 679.410 of this chapter.
##### 



1.
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2007
    /s/    RICHARD C.  ROCHONChief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.20

 130.04

 129.84

 129.83

 129.87

 129.91

 129.89

 129.88

 129.92

 130.01

 130.12

 130.24

 130.26

 130.36

 130.34

 130.14

 129.96

 129.75

 129.64

 129.55

 129.36

 129.48

 129.70

 129.90

 129.99

 130.26

 130.36

 130.37

 130.34

 130.39

 601

 585

 564

 563

 567

 571

 569

 568

 572

 582

 593

 605

 608

 619

 616

 595

 577

 556

 545

 536

 518

 529

 551

 570

 580

 608

 619

 620

 616

 622

STORAGE

+25

-16

-21

-1

+4

+4

-2

-1

+4

+10

+11

+12

+3

+11

-3

-21

-18

-21

-11

-9

-18

+11

+22

+19

+10

+28

+11

+1

-4

+6

CHANGE

112

105

108

118

121

132

133

133

134

133

133

126

119

112

95

86

88

86

89

90

97

116

114

114

121

123

111

111

126

156

INFLOW

 46

 48

 49

 49

 49

 49

 49

 49

 49

 48

 47

 47

 47

 47

 47

 47

 47

 47

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 45

 63

 90

PUTAH

 53

 65

 70

 70

 70

 81

 85

 85

 83

 80

 80

 73

 70

 59

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 50

 61

 65

 58

 59

 71

 64

 60

 65

 65

 63

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .03

 .07

 .11

 .09

 .11

 .07

 .08

 .10

 .11

 .11

 .09

 .08

 .07

 .01

 .07

 .11

 .10

 .09

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .11

 .09

 .07

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .00

INCHES

 .21

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .18

 .14

 .16

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .31

 .42

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 RUN DATE: 12/01/2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +46 3,442 1,955 1,464 0 2.06 1.62

ACRE-FEET +46 6,827 3,878 2,904 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,904

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,878

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.62

JULY 1, 2014 2.16

 576

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
#### John Hume, Respondent, v. Isbrandtsen Company, Inc., Appellant.

Order -unanimously modified as follows: (a) By striking out items eighth, tenth, eleventh and sixteenth to nineteenth, inclusive, of plaintiff's demand for bill of particulars; (b) as to item second (c), the word “exact” is struck and as to item *852second (d) the words “and to whom same was paid” are struck; (e) as to item third, it will suffice for defendant to state generally the other items of loss or damage claimed to have been suffered; (d) as to item twelfth, the words “in detail” are struck and “generally” substituted; the last sentence of that item is also struck; (e) as to item fourteenth, the words “the details as to” are struck; (f) as to item fifteenth, the words “each and every act of” are struck and “generally the acts” substituted in place thereof. The bill of particulars shall be served in accordance with the demand as herewith modified at such time as may be fixed in the order to be settled. As so modified the order is affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
### §287p. Citizenship of members

Each such member of the National Commission must be an American citizen.

(July 30, 1946, ch. 700, §4, 60 Stat. 713.)
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.141 Notice of deficiency. ( a ) *Notification timeline.* If the CO determines the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* or job order is incomplete, contains errors or inaccuracies, or does not meet the requirements set forth in this subpart, the CO will notify the employer within 7 calendar days of the CO's receipt of the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification.* A copy of this notification will be sent to the SWA serving the area of intended employment.
( b ) *Notice content.* The notice will: ( 1 ) State the reason(s) the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* or job order fails to meet the criteria for acceptance;
( 2 ) Offer the employer an opportunity to submit a modified *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* or job order within 5 business days from date of receipt stating the modification that is needed for the CO to issue the NOA;
( 3 ) State that the CO's determination on whether to grant or deny the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* will be made not later than 30 calendar days before the first date of need, provided that the employer submits the requested modification to the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* or job order within 5 business days and in a manner specified by the CO; and
( 4 ) State that if the employer does not comply with the requirements of § 655.142, the CO will deny the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 83

 84

 92

 85

 85

 86

 86

 86

 87

 91

 93

 97

 94

 86

 84

 84

 82

 80

 81

 84

 87

 81

 105

 97

 93

 101

 93

 90

 88

 89

 91

 79

 80

 81

 82

 82

 84

 83

 84

 84

 85

 77

 78

 82

 82

 79

 79

 77

 76

 76

 75

 77

 74

 82

 90

 89

 92

 89

 85

 84

 85

 86

 81

 82

 84

 84

 84

 85

 84

 85

 85

 88

 83

 86

 89

 84

 81

 82

 79

 78

 79

 79

 84

 78

 94

 92

 91

 96

 91

 87

 86

 87

 88

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 5, 2016

HIGH LOW MEAN

 48.7

 50.0

 51.9

 51.6

 51.1

 52.9

 54.2

 54.6

 56.8

 56.0

 55.5

 53.6

 53.4

 51.1

 48.9

 47.0

 47.3

 48.0

 50.7

 50.0

 51.7

 54.3

 53.7

 52.0

 49.9

 47.9

 46.0

 47.3

 46.2

 46.3

 46.5

 46.2

 47.6

 49.0

 49.1

 49.3

 50.4

 52.1

 52.8

 54.7

 55.2

 53.8

 51.6

 51.3

 49.1

 47.1

 45.2

 45.2

 45.6

 48.0

 48.6

 49.9

 51.3

 52.1

 50.1

 48.1

 45.9

 44.4

 45.8

 44.5

 43.9

 44.6

 47.5

 48.7

 49.9

 50.4

 50.3

 51.6

 53.0

 53.7

 55.7

 55.5

 54.7

 52.7

 52.5

 50.1

 48.0

 46.3

 46.3

 46.8

 49.6

 49.5

 50.5

 52.9

 53.2

 51.1

 48.8

 46.9

 45.5

 46.3

 45.5

 45.2

 45.6

HIGH LOW MEAN

 11.9

 11.8

 11.3

 11.1

 11.4

 11.2

 11.0

 10.8

 10.6

 10.0

 10.1

 10.5

 10.1

 10.6

 11.3

 11.8

 12.0

 11.9

 11.4

 11.4

 10.9

 10.8

 10.0

 9.8

 10.6

 11.2

 11.6

 11.5

 11.8

 11.7

 11.9

 11.5

 11.3

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.7

 10.5

 10.3

 10.0

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 10.0

 10.5

 11.1

 11.4

 11.3

 10.8

 10.7

 10.4

 10.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.8

 10.3

 11.1

 11.2

 11.2

 11.5

 11.5

 11.6

 11.5

 11.1

 10.9

 11.0

 10.9

 10.7

 10.5

 10.2

 9.7

 9.8

 10.0

 10.0

 10.3

 10.9

 11.4

 11.6

 11.6

 11.1

 10.9

 10.7

 10.4

 9.5

 9.5

 10.3

 10.8

 11.4

 11.3

 11.5

 11.6

 11.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
October 2023

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE - FEET INFLOW RIVER EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

3,332.3

1 1,021.57 3,324.8 -7.5 2,293 6,008 0 0 71 0.10 0.00

2 1,021.30 3,318.3 -6.5 2,271 5,412 0 0 157 0.22 0.00

3 1,021.06 3,312.5 -5.8 2,936 5,774 0 0 93 0.13 0.00

4 1,020.86 3,307.7 -4.8 3,598 5,897 0 0 135 0.19 0.00

5 1,020.69 3,303.6 -4.1 3,736 5,630 0 0 171 0.24 0.00

6 1,020.39 3,296.3 -7.2 2,523 6,026 0 0 142 0.20 0.00

7 1,020.24 3,292.7 -3.6 3,740 5,456 0 0 106 0.15 0.00

8 1,019.87 3,283.8 -8.9 1,296 5,655 0 0 135 0.19 0.00

9 1,019.60 3,277.3 -6.5 2,669 5,818 0 0 127 0.18 0.00

10 1,019.47 3,274.2 -3.1 5,775 5,372 0 1,960 21 0.03 0.05

11 1,019.22 3,268.2 -6.0 2,277 5,310 0 0 0 0.00 0.25

12 1,018.94 3,261.4 -6.7 2,703 5,695 0 339 63 0.09 0.00

13 1,018.68 3,255.2 -6.2 2,698 5,759 0 0 77 0.11 0.00

14 1,018.43 3,249.2 -6.0 2,497 5,459 0 0 56 0.08 0.00

15 1,018.16 3,242.8 -6.5 2,549 5,738 0 0 70 0.10 0.00

16 1,017.95 3,237.7 -5.0 2,534 5,017 0 0 49 0.07 0.00

17 1,017.67 3,231.1 -6.7 2,419 5,740 0 0 42 0.06 0.00

18 1,017.38 3,224.2 -6.9 2,338 5,709 0 0 112 0.16 0.00

19 1,017.07 3,216.8 -7.4 2,205 5,809 0 0 119 0.17 0.00

20 1,016.87 3,212.0 -4.7 3,831 6,113 0 0 112 0.16 0.00

21 1,016.64 3,206.6 -5.5 3,309 5,973 0 0 84 0.12 0.00

22 1,016.41 3,201.1 -5.4 3,378 6,077 0 0 49 0.07 0.05

23 1,016.15 3,195.0 -6.2 2,905 5,997 0 0 14 0.02 0.08

24 1,015.93 3,189.8 -5.2 3,073 5,621 0 0 76 0.11 0.00

25 1,015.79 3,186.4 -3.3 3,940 5,493 0 0 111 0.16 0.00

26 1,015.50 3,179.6 -6.8 2,254 5,611 0 0 90 0.13 0.00

27 1,015.26 3,174.0 -5.7 2,926 5,718 0 0 62 0.09 0.00

28 1,014.95 3,166.6 -7.3 2,285 5,829 0 0 138 0.20 0.00

29 1,014.61 3,158.7 -8.0 2,214 6,137 0 0 97 0.14 0.00

30 1,014.34 3,152.3 -6.3 2,842 5,897 0 0 138 0.20 0.00

31 1,014.09 3,146.5 -5.9 3,384 6,257 0 0 83 0.12 0.00

TOTALS -185.7 89,398 178,007 0 2,299 2,800 3.99 0.43

ACRE-FEET -185,700 177,321 353,077 0 4,560 5,554

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 353,077 Outlet 4,560

Spill 0 Total 357,637

Precipitation

This month = 0.43

October 01, 2023 To date = 0.43

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Shasta Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 11/15/2023
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.732 What is the second LCA requirement, regarding working conditions? An employer seeking to employ H-1B nonimmigrants in specialty occupations or as fashion models of distinguished merit and ability shall state on Form ETA 9035 or 9035E that the employment of H-1B nonimmigrants will not adversely affect the working conditions of workers similarly employed in the area of intended employment. For the purposes of this section, “H-1B” includes “E-3 and H-1B1” as well. ( a ) *Establishing the working conditions requirement.* The second LCA requirement shall be satisfied when the employer affords working conditions to its H-1B nonimmigrant employees on the same basis and in accordance with the same criteria as it affords to its U.S. worker employees who are similarly employed, and without adverse effect upon the working conditions of such U.S. worker employees. Working conditions include matters such as hours, shifts, vacation periods, and benefits such as seniority-based preferences for training programs and work schedules. The employer's obligation regarding working conditions shall extend for the longer of two periods: the validity period of the certified LCA, or the period during which the H-1B nonimmigrant(s) is(are) employed by the employer.
( b ) *Documentation of the working condition statement.* In the event of an enforcement action pursuant to subpart I of this part, the employer shall produce documentation to show that it has afforded its H-1B nonimmigrant employees working conditions on the same basis and in accordance with the same criteria as it affords its U.S. worker employees who are similarly employed.
[65 FR 80221, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 63302, Dec. 5, 2001; 73 FR 19949, Apr. 11, 2008]
(No. 73-CC-433

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 6, 1973.*

D. K. Me Intosh, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A2118. RICHARD BISHOP v. THE STATE.

A jury found RichardBishop guilty of operating a chop shop, theft by receiving

stolen property, and possession of tools for the commission of a crime, and his

convictions were affirmed on appeal in an unpublished opinion. See Bishop v. State,

Case No. A16A1486 (decided February 14, 2017). Bishop subsequently filed an

extraordinary motion for new trial, which the trial court denied. Bishop then filed

this direct appeal.

An order denying an extraordinary motion for a new trial must be appealed by

application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (7); Balkcom v. State,

227 Ga. App. 327, 329 (489 SE2d 129) (1997). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction

over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 10, 2017

08/10/2017
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Improved algorithms in theCE-QUAL-W2 water-quality model for blending dam releases to meet downstreamwater-temperature targets**
 
Report | Examples | Model Source
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2015-1027
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000942997
 
May 1, 2018
<PAGE>   1


Exhibit 11.1 - Computation of Earnings Per Common Share.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     Three Months Ended June 30,
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                        1998           1999
                                                    ------------    ------------
<S>                                                 <C>             <C>
 Numerator:
      Income (loss) from continuing
          operations                                $   (493,824)   $    118,960
      Discontinued operations                           (521,464)             --
                                                    ------------    ------------
      Net income (loss)                               (1,015,288)        118,960
      Preferred stock dividends and
          accretion                                     (603,034)             --
                                                    ------------    ------------
      Numerator for basic and diluted
          earnings per share - income (loss)
          attributable to common shareholders       $ (1,618,322)   $    118,960
                                                    ============    ============

Denominator:
      Denominator for basic earnings per
          share - weighted average shares              8,652,868      11,815,409
      Effect of dilutive securities:
          Employee stock options                              --         680,195
          Warrants                                            --         396,092
          Convertible preferred stock                         --          62,160
                                                    ------------    ------------
      Dilutive potential common shares                        --       1,138,447
      Denominator for diluted earnings per
          share - adjusted weighted average
          shares and assumed conversions               8,652,868      12,953,856
                                                    ============    ============

</TABLE>
Exhibit
                32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), does
      hereby certify, to the best of her knowledge, that:





1. 
      The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2007 (the
      “Report”) of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and





2. 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      India
      Creery.


India
      Creery, External Acting Chief Financial Officer





Date:
      January 24, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 130.63

 130.55

 130.51

 130.17

 129.91

 130.41

 130.53

 130.41

 130.32

 130.19

 130.19

 130.02

 130.14

 130.54

 130.20

 130.68

 129.76

 129.81

 129.82

 130.05

 130.27

 130.12

 130.03

 130.18

 130.26

 130.12

 128.39

 131.07

 648

 639

 634

 598

 571

 624

 636

 624

 614

 600

 600

 583

 595

 637

 601

 654

 556

 561

 562

 586

 609

 593

 584

 599

 608

 593

 432

 698

STORAGE

+11

-9

-5

-36

-27

+53

+12

-12

-10

-14

+0

-17

+12

+42

-36

+53

-98

+5

+1

+24

+23

-16

-9

+15

+9

-15

-161

+266

CHANGE

1,131

1,120

1,167

1,148

1,111

1,083

999

992

957

923

892

871

817

789

744

744

610

651

643

575

479

440

408

380

355

358

1,551

3,373

INFLOW

 1,066

 1,065

 1,110

 1,106

 1,065

 995

 926

 928

 892

 860

 822

 810

 741

 701

 696

 652

 594

 576

 567

 491

 404

 378

 343

 302

 286

 311

 1,573

 3,180

PUTAH

 59

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 67

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 70

 67

 65

 65

 65

 72

 75

 72

 63

 70

 70

 70

 64

 55

 59

 59

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .04

 .10

 .03

 .04

 .11

 .15

 .09

 .08

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .10

 .12

 .14

 .27

 .09

 .07

 .04

 .05

 .05

 .08

 .09

 .05

 .06

 .06

 .09

 .00

 .00

INCHES

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .42

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.95

 2.23

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

FEBRUARY 2006 RUN DATE: 07/17/2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +61 25,311 1,837 23,440 2 2.29 4.84

ACRE-FEET +61 50,204 3,644 46,493 4

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 46,493

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,644

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.84

JULY 1, 2005 24.63

 637

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK