alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsField Guide for Designing Human Interaction with Intelligent SystemsThe characteristics of this Field Guide approach address the problems of designing innovative software to support user tasks. The requirements for novel software are difficult to specify a priori, because there is not sufficient understanding of how the users' tasks should be supported, and there are not obvious pre-existing design solutions. When the design team is in unfamiliar territory, care must be taken to avoid rushing into detailed design, requirements specification, or implementation of the wrong product. The challenge is to get the right design and requirements in an efficient, cost-effective manner. This document's purpose is to describe the methods we are using to design human interactions with intelligent systems which support Space Shuttle flight controllers in the Mission Control Center at NASA/Johnson Space Center. Although these software systems usually have some intelligent features, the design challenges arise primarily from the innovation needed in the software design. While these methods are tailored to our specific context, they should be extensible, and helpful to designers of human interaction with other types of automated systems. We review the unique features of this context so that you can determine how to apply these methods to your project Throughout this Field Guide, goals of the design methods are discussed. This should help designers understand how a specific method might need to be adapted to the project at hand.Document ID19980210012Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMalin, Jane T.*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Thronesbery, Carroll G.*(Metrica, Inc. Houston, TX United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1998Subject CategorySystems AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-208470S-841NAS 1.15:208470Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980210012.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         516,507
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               649,091
<PP&E>                                       5,416,801
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,540,132
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,633,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          193,743
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,439,849
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,633,592
<SALES>                                      1,504,173
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,538,407
<CGS>                                        1,099,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,099,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               330,072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            108,768
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   108,768
<EPS-BASIC>                                    11.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.94




</TABLE>
(No. 73—CC—149

#### Clarence O. Scott, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1973.*

Clarence O. Scott, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated November 21, 2011, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on November 29, 2011, 76 FR 73679, Johnson Matthey Inc., Pharmaceuticals Materials, 900 River Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleDiphenoxylate (9170)
IIMeperidine (9230)
IIMethadone (9250)
IIMethadone Intermediate (9254)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for distribution and sale to its customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: April 17, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-10050 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Mineralogy and origin of sediments from drill holes on the 
continental margin off Florida

#### Professional Paper 581-E

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plate: **Plate 1**                                
  (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp581E 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:54
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23(c)






                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in this registration statement of our reports dated
January 26, 1999 included or incorporated by reference in Consumers Energy
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 and to all references
to our Firm included in this registration statement.



/s/ Arthur Andersen LLC

Detroit, Michigan,
   October 15, 1999.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Northern Explorations Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: June 28, 2009


By: /s/ Mark Schaftlein
   ----------------------------------
   Mark Schaftlein
   President/Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ David Naylor
   ----------------------------------
   David Naylor
   Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan Alberto GARCIA-MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40948.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, H. Michael Sokolow, Laura Fletcher Leavitt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ivan Alberto Garcia-Mendoza raises arguments that" are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. *289§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit 10.22


 


Power
of Attorney


 


I, Yuanfen Yang, a Chinese citizen with Chinese Identification Card No.: 510107197408210928, and a holder of 0.96%
of the entire registered capital in Chengdu Puyi Bohui Information Technology Co., Ltd., (the “Company”) (the “My
Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize Puyi Enterprises Management Consulting Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”) to
exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the term of this Power of Attorney:


 


	1.	The WFOE is hereby authorized to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive
agent and attorney with respect to all matters concerning My Shareholding, including without limitation to: 1) attend shareholders'
meetings of the Company; 2) exercise all the shareholder's rights and shareholder's voting rights I am entitled to under the laws
of China and the Company’s Articles of Association, including but not limited to the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition
of My Shareholding in part or in whole; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself the legal representative, the executive
director and/or director, supervisor, the chief executive officer and other senior management members of the Company.
	 	 
	2.	Without limiting the generality of the powers granted hereunder, the WFOE
shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to execute the Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option
Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to effect the terms of the Share Pledge Agreement and
Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to which I am a party.
	 	 
	3.	All the actions associated with My Shareholding conducted by the WFOE shall
be deemed as my own actions, and all the documents related to My Shareholding executed by the WFOE shall be deemed to be executed
by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by the WFOE.
	 	 
	4.	The WFOE is entitled to re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any
other person or entity at its own discretion and without giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent.



 


This Power of Attorney
is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney,
so long as I am a shareholder of the Company.


 


During the term of this Power of Attorney,
I hereby waive all the rights associated with My Shareholding, which have been authorized to WFOE through this Power of Attorney,
and shall not exercise such rights by myself.


  


This Power of Attorney is written in Chinese
and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail.


 


	By:	/s/ Yuanfen Yang	 	By:	/s/ Jianhua Feng
	 	 	 	 	 
	Signatory: Yuanfen Yang	 	Witness: Jianhua Feng
	Date: September 6, 2018	 	Date: September 6, 2018


 


Strictly Confidential
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.532 Where and when should attestations be submitted for locations in Alaska? ( a ) Attestations shall be submitted, by U.S. mail, private carrier, or facsimile transmission to the U.S. Department of Labor regional office of the Employment and Training Administration in Seattle, Washington. Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, attestations shall be received and date-stamped by the Department at least 30 calendar days prior to the date of the first performance of the longshore activity. The attestation shall be accepted for filing or returned by ETA in accordance with § 655.538 within 14 calendar days of the date received by ETA. An attestation which is accepted by ETA solely because it was not reviewed within 14 days is subject to subsequent invalidation pursuant to § 655.540 of this part. An employer filing an attestation shall have an agent or representative with a United States address. Such address shall be clearly indicated on the Form ETA 9033-A. In order to ensure that an attestation has been accepted for filing prior to the date of the first performance of the longshore activity, employers are advised to take mailing time into account to make sure that ETA receives the attestation at least 30 days prior to the first performance of the longshore activity.
( b ) *Late filings.* ETA may accept for filing attestations received after the 30-day deadline where the employer could not have reasonably anticipated the need to file an attestation for the particular location at that time. When an employer states that it could not have reasonably anticipated the need to file the attestation at that time, it shall submit documentation to ETA to support such a claim. ETA shall then make a determination on the validity of the claim and shall accept the attestation for filing or return it in accordance with § 655.538 of this part. ETA in no case shall accept an attestation received less than 24 hours prior to the first performance of the activity.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6647

ERIC D. HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUFUS FLEMING, et als,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-95-273-R)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: June 18, 1996

Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric D. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,

1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be

final if "no amendment [to the complaint] could cure defects in the

plaintiff's case." Id. at 1067. In ascertaining whether a dismissal

without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must

determine "whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely

amending the complaint." Id. at 1066-67.

Since Appellant could have amended his complaint to assert

some claims, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because

we find the order is not appealable. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §9688. Incidental transfers

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget, in consultation with the Corporation, is authorized and directed to make such additional incidental dispositions of personnel, assets, and liabilities held, used, arising from, available, or to be made available, in connection with the functions transferred by this subchapter, as the Director may determine necessary to accomplish the purposes of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 115–254, div. F, title VI, §1468, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3515.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title VI (§§1461–1470) of div. F of Pub. L. 115–254, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3510, which is classified principally to this subchapter and which repealed title IV of chapter 2 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2191 et seq.), other than subsections (g), (l), (m), and (n) of section 237 thereof (22 U.S.C. 2197(g), (l), (m), (n)), among other amendments. For complete classification of title VI to the Code, see Tables.

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this division", meaning division F of Pub. L. 115–254, Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3485, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of division F to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 9601 of this title and Tables.
§ 614.8 The applicable State for an individual. ( a ) *The applicable State.* The applicable State for an individual shall be the State to which the individual's Federal military service and Federal military wages are assigned or transferred under this section. The applicable State law for the individual shall be the State law of such State.
( b ) *Assignment of service and wages.* ( 1 ) When an individual files a first claim, all of the individual's Federal military service and Federal military wages shall be deemed to be assigned to the State in which such claim is filed, which shall be the “Paying State” in the case of a combined-wage claim. (§ 616.6(e) of this chapter.)
( 2 ) Federal military service and Federal military wages assigned to a State in error shall be reassigned for use by the proper State agency. An appropriate record of the reassignment shall be made by the State agency which makes the reassignment.
( c ) *Assignment deemed complete.* All of an individual's Federal military service and Federal military wages shall be deemed to have been assigned to a State upon the filing of a first claim. Federal military service and Federal military wages shall be assigned to a State only in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Use of assigned service and wages.* All assigned Federal military service and Federal military wages shall be used only by the State to which assigned in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, except that any Federal military service and Federal military wages which are not within the base period of the State to which they were assigned shall be subject to transfer in accordance with part 616 of this chapter for the purposes of any subsequent Combined-Wage Claim filed by the individual.