alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4338 

To provide that the authority to grant clemency for offenses against the 

District of Columbia shall be exercised in accordance with law enacted 

by the District of Columbia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2016 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide that the authority to grant clemency for offenses 

against the District of Columbia shall be exercised in 

accordance with law enacted by the District of Columbia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘District of Columbia 

5 Home Rule Clemency Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4338 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO GRANT CLEMENCY IN ACCORDANCE 

2 WITH DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAW FOR OF3 FENSES AGAINST DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY DESCRIBED.—The authority to grant 

5 clemency for offenses against the District of Columbia 

6 shall be exercised by such person or persons, and under 

7 such terms and conditions, as may be provided under law 

8 enacted by the District of Columbia. 

9 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

10 may be construed to affect any authority exercised by the 

11 President or the Mayor of the District of Columbia prior 

12 to the effective date of any law enacted by the District 

13 of Columbia pursuant to this Act with respect to the au14 thority to grant clemency for offenses against the District 

15 of Columbia. 

16 (c) CLEMENCY DEFINED.—In this Act, the term 

17 ‘‘clemency’’ means a pardon, reprieve, or commutation of 

18 sentence, or a remission of a fine or other financial pen19 alty. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
November 2021

STORAGE ACRE-FEET SAN LUIS RELEASE - C.F.S. GAIN(+) OR EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY

ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE PUMPING 

C.F.S

POWER PACHECO

TUNNEL

SPILL LOSS(-) C.F.S. C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

286,786

1 369.50 302,242 15,456 8,469 0 82 0 -595 53 0.25 0.00

2 371.54 315,501 13,259 7,174 0 129 0 -360 9 0.04 0.01

3 372.25 320,164 4,663 2,589 0 134 0 -104 9 0.04 0.00

4 373.18 326,308 6,144 3,571 0 140 0 -333 22 0.10 0.00

5 374.55 335,434 9,126 5,006 0 137 0 -268 44 0.20 0.00

6 375.93 344,715 9,281 5,228 0 137 0 -412 29 0.13 0.00

7 377.99 359,076 14,361 7,718 0 140 0 -337 34 0.15 0.00

8 379.69 370,918 11,842 6,418 0 153 0 -295 34 0.15 0.00

9 382.07 387,729 16,811 5,907 0 101 0 2,667 16 0.07 0.32

10 383.30 396,523 8,794 4,847 0 109 0 -304 14 0.06 0.01

11 384.04 401,848 5,325 6,849 0 113 0 -4,046 14 0.06 0.00

12 386.96 423,113 21,265 7,499 0 122 0 3,341 7 0.03 0.00

13 388.41 433,821 10,708 5,664 0 117 0 -148 29 0.12 0.02

14 389.16 439,398 5,577 3,004 0 118 0 -74 5 0.02 0.00

15 390.07 446,201 6,803 3,770 0 116 0 -224 7 0.03 0.00

16 391.16 454,399 8,198 4,490 0 132 0 -225 5 0.02 0.00

17 391.75 458,860 4,461 2,418 0 131 0 -38 5 0.02 0.00

18 392.05 461,134 2,274 1,480 0 125 0 -209 12 0.05 0.00

19 392.41 463,869 2,735 1,480 0 122 0 20 12 0.05 0.00

20 392.74 466,381 2,512 1,480 0 114 0 -99 12 0.05 0.00

21 393.05 468,745 2,364 1,480 0 116 0 -172 37 0.15 0.00

22 393.37 471,190 2,445 1,480 0 109 0 -138 12 0.05 0.00

23 393.44 471,726 536 1,480 0 95 0 -1,114 15 0.06 0.00

24 393.65 473,334 1,608 1,480 0 109 0 -560 20 0.08 0.00

25 394.04 476,325 2,991 1,474 0 94 0 128 25 0.10 0.00

26 394.43 479,324 2,999 1,465 0 90 0 137 22 0.09 0.00

27 394.64 480,941 1,617 972 0 90 0 -67 15 0.06 0.00

28 394.67 481,172 231 968 0 71 0 -781 13 0.05 0.00

29 394.94 483,255 2,083 484 0 49 0 614 25 0.10 0.00

30 394.57 480,402 -2,853 487 0 18 0 -1,905 20 0.08 0.00

TOTALS 193,616 106,831 0 3,313 0 -5,901 576 2.46 0.36

ACRE-FEET 193,616 211,903 0 6,575 0 -11,712 1,142

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 0 Spill 0

Pacheco Tunnel 6,575

Total 6,575

Precipitation

This month = 0.36

October 01, 2021 To date = 1.23

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Luis Reservoir Daily Operations

Run Date: 9/26/2023
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 77 (Thursday, April 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9710]

[[Page 22407]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research 
Advisory Committee.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and 
Translational Research Advisory Committee.
    Date: July 13, 2011.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: Strategic Discussion of NCI's Clinical and Translational 
Research Programs.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, C-Wing, 6th 
Floor, 31 Center Drive, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Sheila A. Prindiville, MD, MPH, Director, 
Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Office of the Director, 
National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6120 
Executive Blvd., 3rd Floor Suite, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-5048, 
[email protected].

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 14, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9710 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
(No. 73—CC—132

#### Singer Business Machines, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Singer Business Machines, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 678.610 When is the sole-source selection of one-stop operators appropriate, and how is it conducted? ( a ) States may select a one-stop operator through sole source selection when allowed under the same policies and procedures used for competitive procurement with non-Federal funds, while other non-Federal entities including subrecipients of a State (such as local areas) may select a one-stop operator through sole selection when consistent with local procurement policies and procedures and the Uniform Guidance set out at 2 CFR 200.320.
( b ) In the event that sole source procurement is determined necessary and reasonable, in accordance with § 678.605(c), written documentation must be prepared and maintained concerning the entire process of making such a selection.
( c ) Such sole source procurement must include appropriate conflict of interest policies and procedures. These policies and procedures must conform to the specifications in § 679.430 of this chapter for demonstrating internal controls and preventing conflict of interest.
( d ) A Local WDB may be selected as a one-stop operator through sole source procurement only with agreement of the chief elected official in the local area and the Governor. The Local WDB must establish sufficient conflict of interest policies and procedures and these policies and procedures must be approved by the Governor.
§ 663.150 What core services must be provided to adults and dislocated workers? ( a ) At a minimum, all of the core services described in WIA section 134(d)(2) and 20 CFR 662.240 must be provided in each local area through the One-Stop delivery system.
( b ) Followup services must be made available, as appropriate, for a minimum of 12 months following the first day of employment, to registered participants who are placed in unsubsidized employment.
#### William Gorman, Appellant, v. Andrew J. Gillegan, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 709.37

 708.74

 707.82

 708.06

 709.25

 710.06

 710.24

 708.81

 708.09

 710.21

 707.95

 709.04

 710.80

 710.08

 708.25

 710.08

 711.08

 710.37

 709.75

 709.24

 708.51

 708.48

 707.60

 708.18

 707.40

 708.82

 707.05

 707.17

 707.11

 708.35

 707.76

 843

 826

 800

 807

 840

 863

 868

 828

 808

 867

 804

 834

 885

 863

 812

 863

 893

 872

 854

 840

 819

 818

 794

 810

 788

 828

 778

 782

 780

 815

 798

STORAGE

-11

-17

-26

+7

+33

+23

+5

-40

-20

+59

-63

+30

+51

-22

-51

+51

+30

-21

-18

-14

-21

-1

-24

+16

-22

+40

-50

+4

-2

+35

-17

CHANGE

24

21

17

27

32

27

22

10

13

32

-2

25

26

7

0

26

18

9

11

13

9

19

8

18

3

23

-7

10

9

21

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 30

 30

 30

 23

 15

 15

 19

 30

 23

 2

 30

 10

 0

 18

 26

 0

 3

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 10

 14

 3

 18

 8

 10

 3

 12

 0930

 1030

 1020

 0930

 1045

TIME

 .07

 .09

 .10

 .12

 .12

COPPER

 .28

 .30

 .33

 .45

 .45

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2006 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 10, 2006

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -56 474 0 502

ACRE-FEET -56 940 0 996

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 996

 996

 854

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .002

 .003

 .003

 .002

 .002

Table 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 713.74

 715.06

 717.08

 718.31

 718.90

 718.76

 717.96

 716.88

 715.54

 713.92

 711.95

 709.38

 709.23

 711.24

 713.80

 736.04

 770.39

 772.49

 762.20

 750.98

 738.36

 720.65

 710.04

 710.98

 725.43

 735.85

 728.53

 722.04

 716.03

 975

 1,017

 1,084

 1,126

 1,147

 1,142

 1,114

 1,077

 1,033

 980

 920

 844

 839

 898

 977

 1,842

 3,877

 4,029

 3,317

 2,622

 1,951

 1,209

 862

 890

 1,390

 1,833

 1,515

 1,260

 1,049

STORAGE

-31

+42

+67

+42

+21

-5

-28

-37

-44

-53

-60

-76

-5

+59

+79

+865

+2,035

+152

-712

-695

-671

-742

-347

+28

+500

+443

-318

-255

-211

CHANGE

12

51

65

52

41

32

26

21

17

11

8

-1

17

30

40

436

1,110

405

121

150

162

126

63

64

410

551

298

121

83

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 28

 30

 31

 31

 30

 35

 40

 40

 39

 38

 38

 37

 20

 0

 0

 0

 84

 328

 480

 500

 500

 500

 238

 50

 158

 328

 458

 250

 189

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2004 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 29, 2004

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +43 4,522 0 4,500

ACRE-FEET +43 8,969 0 8,926

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 8,926

 8,926

 1,006

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
### THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590
August 22, 2013

The Honorable Cedric B. Glover**~ayorofShreveport** P.O. Box 31109 Shreveport, LA 71130 Dear**~ayor** Glover: 

### -- :2

Thank you for your letter supportingthe application submitted by the ShreveportAirport Autho_rity for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program. The Small Community Air Service Development Program was established to help smaller communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, althot1gh no more than four awards maybe to communities in the same State. In order to provide communities with latitude indeveloping solutions to theirair service deficiencies, the statuteprovides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. OnJune 24, the Departmentissued an order setting adeadline ofJuly 26 for applications. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany particularproposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and this response inDocket DOT-OST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in this program. Sincerely,

Anthony R. FoxxC£0RIC**~-** Gt.OV£R**~·\'OR**

July24, 2013 OFFICE OF THE MA'(OR SHREVEPORT. LOUISIANA.

The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secre\(\ry; U.S.Depanment ofTransponation 1200 NewJersey Ave,, SE Washington, District ofColumbia 20590 Deat Secretary Pol\'X, I'OST Oftl<:S I!OX 31 f.09 $l!!lt;VO'Qll'f, IJ\ 7u**~0** 13\&)**lfi~®!SO** Ita\!>) 67:}-'il099 If loll)

Thank you for yourconsideration ofthe Shreveport Ail:port Authority's request to expand airline service through a new route 10 the Midwest or Atlantic region. The creation of this r()utc is essential for the region served by Shreveport Regional Ail)1ort. The growing economy of Northwest Louisiana,**Ees~** Texas and Southwest Arkansas depends upon Shreveport Regional Ail}1orl to provide airline connections to the United States and to the world. We fully support the Shreveport Airport Authority's eiforts to**crea~** additional airline**~rvice** on a new route. The approval of Shreveport's Small CQmmunity Ait Service Development grant request wilt help U1e region meel its emerging needs for inereas(ld airline service. Thank. you again for your cousideratioo.

# ~1! f:z_
MAYOR

# ~-

22
#### § 685.130 How does the Department assist grantees to serve eligible migrant and seasonal farmworkers?

The Department provides guidance, administrative support, technical assistance, and training to grantees for the purposes of program implementation, and program performance management to enhance services and promote continuous improvement in the employment outcomes of eligible MSFWs.
494 P.2d 983

#### Gregorio VALDEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GLOVER PACKING COMPANY and John Doe Workmen’s Compensation Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 773

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Feb. 25, 1972.

Albert J. Rivera, Alamogordo, for plaintiff-appellant.

John P. Cusack, Frazier, Cusack & Schnedar, Roswell, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

COWAN, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a workmen’s compensation case.

We affirm.

The trial court found that the injury to' plaintiff was the result of personal animosity between the plaintiff and one Robert Brown; that it was not reasonably incident to plaintiff’s employment; and that it did not arise out of his employment. Plaintiff’s points relied upon for reversal raise the *571question of sufficiency of the evidence to support the findings.

We view the evidence in the light most favorable to support the findings, disregarding all evidence unfavorable thereto. Lopez v. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Company, 79 N.M. 485, 444 P.2d 996 (Ct.App.1968).

The ^plaintiff and Robert Brown were employed by Glover Packing Company in Roswell, working on the kill floor. Just prior to the incident in which plaintiff was injured, he had twice squirted Brown with hot water from a cleaning hose. Brown then started toward the plaintiff, who picked up a meat hook. Brown had some tools in his hands, including a butcher knife. As they came together, a foreman moved in and shoved them 10 to 15 feet apart. The plaintiff “started hollering” and threw the meat hook at Brown, hitting him on the side of the head. Brown, either voluntarily or by reflex action, then threw his tools at the plaintiff. Plaintiff’s left arm was cut, resulting in a total loss of use of the arm at the elbow.

The evidence was conflicting and it was for the trial court to determine the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony. Lopez v. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Company, supra. The court resolved the conflict by its findings and such findings were supported by the evidence. Since the injury to plaintiff did not arise out of his employment, it was not compensable. Perez v. Fred Harvey, Inc., 54 N.M. 339, 224 P.2d 524 (1950).

Plaintiff contends that the injury necessarily arose out of the employment, arguing that the question as to who might be the aggressor has no place in workmen’s compensation law. *Perez,*supra, answers this contention, pointing out that it is a question of fact whether the injury results from '“purely personal motives” or “arises out of the employee’s work.” The trial court’s finding was that the injury in this case was the result of personal animosity. There being substantial evidence to support this finding, no discussion is required as to which of the two men may have been the aggressor.

Plaintiff also contends that his injury cannot be considered to have been “wilfully suffered” under § 59-10-8, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 9, pt. 1). This was never an issue in the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and SUTIN, J., concur.
<PAGE>   1







                                   EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                      Computation of Net Earnings per Share


Net earnings for earnings per share are computed by subtracting from the
applicable earnings the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
earnings available to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of common stock outstanding during the period.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   For the            For the         For the Six          For the
                                                   Quarter            Quarter            Months            Period
                                                    ended              ended             ended              ended
                                                   June 30,           June 30,          June 30,           June 30,
                                                    1999                1998              1999               1998
                                                --------------     --------------    ---------------    --------------

<S>                                              <C>                <C>                <C>                <C>
Net Earnings                                     $    1,626         $    1,750         $    3,404         $    2,433
Less: preferred stock dividends                       1,222              1,222              2,444              1,705
                                                 ----------         ----------         ----------         ----------
Net income available to common stock             $      404         $      528         $      960         $      728
                                                 ==========         ==========         ==========         ==========

Average common shares outstanding                 1,000,000            719,780          1,000,000            642,226

Net earnings per share - basic                   $     0.40         $     0.73         $     0.96         $     1.13

Net earnings per share - diluted                 $     0.40         $     0.73         $     0.96         $     1.13
</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 394.43

 395.10

 396.00

 396.46

 397.00

 397.57

 398.30

 398.88

 399.80

 400.28

 401.28

 402.11

 402.67

 403.30

 403.84

 404.40

 404.67

 405.21

 405.70

 406.21

 406.60

 407.10

 407.81

 408.51

 409.43

 410.40

 411.44

 412.32

 413.15

 414.10

 479,324

 484,491

 491,465

 495,043

 499,257

 503,718

 509,454

 514,028

 521,315

 525,132

 533,118

 539,780

 544,292

 549,385

 553,764

 558,320

 560,521

 564,934

 568,949

 573,139

 576,351

 580,478

 586,359

 592,178

 599,858

 607,996

 616,767

 624,226

 631,291

 639,414

STORAGE

+2,538

+5,167

+6,974

+3,578

+4,214

+4,461

+5,736

+4,574

+7,287

+3,817

+7,986

+6,662

+4,512

+5,093

+4,379

+4,556

+2,201

+4,413

+4,015

+4,190

+3,212

+4,127

+5,881

+5,819

+7,680

+8,138

+8,771

+7,459

+7,065

+8,123

CHANGE

1,796

3,134

4,489

2,323

2,729

2,832

3,783

2,587

4,625

2,342

4,733

3,972

2,903

3,257

2,660

2,660

1,795

2,698

2,680

2,680

2,223

2,819

3,165

3,440

4,480

4,820

5,046

4,331

4,189

4,817

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 293

 268

 289

 269

 254

 265

 272

 273

 243

 253

 233

 248

 242

 255

 240

 234

 275

 281

 241

 223

 244

 203

 171

 195

 200

 219

 194

 166

 169

 206

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-223

-262

-683

-250

-350

-319

-616

-9

-708

-165

-473

-366

-387

-434

-212

-129

-410

-193

-415

-345

-360

-535

-29

-311

-408

-498

-430

-404

-458

-515

OR

 136

 213

 151

 151

 96

 127

 97

 269

 149

 116

 117

 59

 79

 102

 79

 100

 80

 80

 80

 80

 80

 125

 48

 49

 38

 82

 74

 107

 102

 83

C.F.S.

 .55

 .85

 .60

 .60

 .38

 .50

 .38

 1.05

 .58

 .45

 .45

 .45

 .30

 .39

 .30

 .38

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .00

 .47

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .30

 .27

 .39

 .00

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR October 24, 2007

DAILY OPERATIONS

SEPTEMBER 2007 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +162,628 100,008 3 7,118 0 -10,897 3,149 11.32 .65

ACRE-FEET +162,628 198,366 6 14,119 0 -21,614 6,246

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 6

PACHECO TUNNEL 14,119 TOTAL 14,125

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2007 TO DATE = .65

 476,786

SPILL 0 .65

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.