alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


<PAGE>


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-21CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-21CB


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                         Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                         Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Treasury United States Mint
 AGENCY: United States Mint, Department of the Treasury.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The United States Mint is announcing 2012 pricing for annual sets and the America the Beautiful Quarters® Bags and Rolls. Please see the table below. Product
Retail Price2012 United States Mint Proof Set®
$31.952012 United States Mint Silver Proof Set®
67.952012 United States Mint Uncirculated Coin Set®
27.952012 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Proof SetTM
14.952012 United States Mint America the Beautiful Quarters Silver Proof SetTM
41.95America the Beautiful Quarters® Bags
34.95America the Beautiful Quarters® Rolls
32.95
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: B. B. Craig, Associate Director for Sales and Marketing; United States Mint; 801 9th Street NW., Washington, DC 20220; or call (202) 354-7500. Authority:
                        31 U.S.C. §§ 5111, 5112 & 9701. Dated: January 13, 2012. Richard A. Peterson, Deputy Director, United States Mint.


[FR Doc. 2012-1024 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
(No. 6855

#### James Mazzolini, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1972.*

Kleiman, Cornfield and Feldman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Richard E. Enright, Respondent, v. The New York Times Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
SCPW-19-0000827

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

DEMONT R. D. CONNER, Petitioner,

vs.

ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT,

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent Judge. 

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner DeMont R. D. Conner’s

petition for writ of mandamus, filed on November 25, 2019, and

the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that

he has a clear and indisputable right to the requested

extraordinary relief from this court and has alternative means to

seek relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982

P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary

remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a

clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative

means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the

requested action). Accordingly,

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-19-0000827

04-DEC-2019

02:25 PM
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the

appellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus

without payment of the filing fee. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 4, 2019. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Novis, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Northern Explorations Ltd., for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Northern Explorations Ltd.

Date: July 1, 2007

                                       /s/ Richard Novis
                                       ----------------------------------
                                       Richard Novis
                                       Secretary, Treasurer and Director
                                       (Principal Financial Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,021.77

 1,021.78

 1,021.73

 1,021.72

 1,021.74

 1,021.70

 1,021.70

 1,021.74

 1,021.82

 1,021.83

 1,021.86

 1,021.91

 1,021.97

 1,022.01

 1,021.99

 1,022.27

 1,022.36

 1,022.50

 1,022.66

 1,022.71

 1,022.94

 1,023.16

 1,023.41

 1,023.70

 1,024.28

 1,025.13

 1,025.86

 1,026.59

 1,027.08

 1,027.61

 1,027.96

 3,329.7

 3,329.9

 3,328.7

 3,328.5

 3,329.0

 3,328.0

 3,328.0

 3,329.0

 3,330.9

 3,331.1

 3,331.9

 3,333.1

 3,334.5

 3,335.5

 3,335.0

 3,341.8

 3,344.0

 3,347.4

 3,351.3

 3,352.5

 3,358.1

 3,363.5

 3,369.6

 3,376.7

 3,390.9

 3,411.9

 3,429.9

 3,448.0

 3,460.2

 3,473.4

 3,482.2

STORAGE

-0.2

+0.2

-1.2

-0.2

+0.5

-1.0

+0.0

+1.0

+1.9

+0.2

+0.7

+1.2

+1.5

+1.0

-0.5

+6.8

+2.2

+3.4

+3.9

+1.2

+5.6

+5.4

+6.1

+7.1

+14.2

+20.9

+18.0

+18.1

+12.2

+13.2

+8.7

CHANGE

 4,583

 5,055

 4,258

 4,646

 4,694

 4,093

 3,974

 4,413

 5,548

 4,607

 4,830

 5,071

 5,345

 5,235

 5,074

 8,216

 5,750

 6,241

 6,826

 5,514

 7,429

 7,403

 7,438

 8,161

 11,400

 14,629

 13,518

 13,235

 10,475

 11,514

 9,048

INFLOW

 4,627

 4,853

 4,862

 4,748

 4,428

 4,568

 3,924

 3,917

 4,557

 4,456

 4,442

 4,446

 4,598

 4,703

 5,283

 4,766

 4,595

 4,494

 4,848

 4,886

 4,577

 4,671

 4,297

 4,576

 4,214

 4,060

 4,355

 4,087

 3,951

 4,815

 4,599

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 361

 0

 0

OUTLET

 79

 79

 7

 21

 21

 14

 50

 7

 14

 29

 21

 14

 14

 43

 36

 14

 50

 29

 14

 14

 29

 22

 58

 7

 14

 22

 66

 15

 22

 29

 44

C.F.S.

 .11

 .11

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .07

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .06

 .05

 .02

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .04

 .03

 .08

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .09

 .02

 .03

 .04

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .13

 .52

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .01

 .91

 .58

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .29

 .58

 .06

 .53

 .14

 1.03

 .05

 .31

 .06

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2020 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 11, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +152.1 218,223 140,203 0 361 898 1.25 5.49

ACRE-FEET +152,100 432,845 278,093 0 716 1,781

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 278,093

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 716

 278,809

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 5.49

JULY 1, 2019 25.65

 3,329.9

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 24.31
Regulatory Revision discussion with Federal Water Quality Coalition

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

EPA Headquarters

Attendees:

EPA OW: Christina Christensen, Grace Robiou, Shari Barash, Manjali Vlcan, Fred Leutner, 

Heather Goss

EPA OGC: Peter Ford, Heidi Karp

Outside groups: C. Richard Bozek (EEI), Fred Andes (FWQC), Pat Casano (GE- Corp. Env. 

Programs), Jerry Schwartz (AF and PA).

Topics covered:

 FWQC asked EPA to summarize its rationale/process for selecting issues to be addressed 

through the proposed rulemaking.

 FWQC comments on analytical methods and their relationship to water quality standards 

enforcement (e.g., standards may not be enforceable if methods are not sensitive enough, 

or states could have ubiquitous attainment problem if methods are too sensitive).

 FWQC noted that some states are successfully implementing antidegradation and some 

states are not, and suggested that EPA not “mess with the good states to get back at the 

bad states.” Issues with antidegradation should not be a regulatory issue, but a 

management issue.

 FWQC suggests EPA encourage flexibility amongst states. 

 FWQC commented that EPA is lacking a single document with comprehensive 

discussion of antidegradation.

 FWQC thinks variances are a useful tool but clarification from EPA would be helpful, 

particularly on when a variance is appropriate and how to justify a variance.

 FWQC suggested that EPA signal to states that variances are okay (similar to the “UAAs 

are OK” memo). EPA’s communication of variances is important.

 FWQC stressed the importance of transparency from EPA.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Docket 48-2011]

The FTZ Board is inviting public comment on new evidence submitted on behalf of North American Tapes, LLC (NAT), in the applicant's rebuttal to comments submitted by interested parties on the amended application requesting authority on behalf of NAT to manufacture athletic tape under FTZ procedures within FTZ 109 (76 FR 43259-43260, 7-20-2011; Amendment—77 FR 13263-13264, 3-6-2012). The rebuttal comments submitted on April 18, 2012, on behalf of NAT contained new evidence on which there has not been a chance for public comment. The comment period on the new evidence is open through May 30, 2012 to allow interested parties to comment on the new evidence in the applicant's rebuttal submission. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary at the following address: Office of the Executive Secretary, Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230-0002.

                    For further information, contact Pierre Duy at                     *Pierre.Duy@trade.gov*                     or (202) 482-1378.                

Dated: April 24, 2012.

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2012-10353 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFrom the Chemistry Lab to LicensingThis is a story of technology maturation and transfer, and licensing. It traces the history of the recently patented ion- exchange material (IEM) from the accidental discovery that this polymer, a battery separator of marginal performance, picked up copper from distilled water passing through corroded copper tubing in the laboratory, to a point where five organizations and one individual have applied for licenses to manufacture and market it or to use it in a wide variety of applications. This story discusses in detail the problems of converting an immature technology into a mature and eventually commercialized technology, without dedicated resources. Readers will develop an appreciation for how the obstacles to maturation and licensing of the technology were faced and overcome. The lessons learned will be discussed, with the hope of enhancing the technology transfer process.Document ID19980233247Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSavino, Joseph M.*(Advanced Manufacturing Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Street, Kenneth W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Philipp, Warren H.*(Philipp Scientific, Inc. Olmsted Falls, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1998Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA/TM-1998-107200E-10185-1NAS 1.15:107200Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 282-10-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980233247.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0744 In the matter of B.A.F ., An Alleged Mentally Ill Person,

Respondent and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 30 , 202 4 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 25 2024

07/25/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0744
(No. 74-CC-297

#### Micro Design, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 28, 1974.*

Micro Design, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*259Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.830 What rules apply to service of pleadings? ( a ) Under this subpart, a party may serve any pleading or document by regular mail. Service on a party is complete upon mailing to the last known address. No additional time for filing or response is authorized where service is by mail. In the interest of expeditious proceedings, the administrative law judge may direct the parties to serve pleadings or documents by a method other than regular mail.
( b ) Two (2) copies of all pleadings and other documents in any administrative law judge proceeding shall be served on the attorneys for the Administrator. One copy shall be served on the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Room N-2716, Washington, DC 20210, and one copy shall be served on the attorney representing the Administrator in the proceeding.
( c ) Time will be computed beginning with the day following the action and includes the last day of the period unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or federally-observed holiday, in which case the time period includes the next business day.
p.1 

OAR Box 1415 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

7) IV-E-7 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/15/2008 9:38:25 AM Sheet 7 of 130 
P.2 

rFZB.Z7.2mal 1:13PM I iO. rc r 

CONTACT REPORT 

St.-

Person CallingPerson Called: 

Date of Contact; 

Keith Bamett 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

OAQPS/ESD/MICG 

919-541-5605 

919-541-3470 (Fax) 

Jeff Voras 

ITW Composites Equipment 

Kewwkum, Wl 

262-626-1914 

262-626-1915 (Fax) 

February 11,2002 

'• '-••'VI' ' 

:"-' • 

> 1 ' 

fe:-

& 

Contact Summaiy 

The purpose of tliis call was to follow up on the comments submitted by ITW on the proposed 

Reinforced Plastic! Composites l^ESHAP 

Mr. Voras stated that iTW considers non-atomized resin spray technology to be demonstrated for 

any filled resin application With the typical filler loadings used in the reinforced plastic composites 

industry. 

We also discussed the current non-atomized spray definition in the proposed rule Mr. Bamett 

stated that we would revise the definition to make it more generic. 

"1 

•I 'V^t 

• " ' *.' . 

Confiiwaucj^HaSpRrm that tJiGjaformaLion above is _£, correct correct tvith thb changes noted above. 

Signage: f^^fl^ * ^Z^^-**^?* 

m 

• ••:$ . 

«•.:> • • i !•
EXHIBIT 32.2



               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended June 30,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Diane C.A. Rosler, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Corporation as of and for the period covered
        by the Report.



                                  /s/ Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Chief Financial Officer


August 8, 2008
### §4505. Applications; payments to eligible institutions

(a) Any institution seeking funding under this chapter shall prepare and submit an application to the Secretary of State once each fiscal year. Each such application shall—

(1) provide a description of the purposes for which the payments will be used in accordance with section 4504 of this title; and

(2) provide such fiscal control and such accounting procedures as may be necessary (A) to ensure a proper accounting of Federal funds paid under this chapter, and (B) to ensure the verification of the costs of the continuing education and research programs conducted under this chapter.

(b) Payments under this chapter may be made in installments, in advance, or by way of reimbursement, with necessary adjustments on account of overpayments and underpayments.

(Pub. L. 98–164, title VIII, §806, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1050.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.52

 130.71

 130.55

 130.68

 130.76

 130.96

 130.52

 130.37

 130.54

 130.45

 130.34

 130.39

 130.46

 130.57

 130.68

 130.75

 130.58

 130.65

 130.80

 130.74

 130.77

 130.88

 130.44

 130.02

 130.56

 130.43

 130.50

 130.79

 130.93

 130.90

 130.92

 635

 657

 639

 654

 663

 685

 635

 620

 637

 628

 616

 622

 629

 641

 654

 662

 642

 650

 667

 660

 664

 676

 627

 583

 640

 626

 633

 666

 682

 678

 680

STORAGE

-8

+22

-18

+15

+9

+22

-50

-15

+17

-9

-12

+6

+7

+12

+13

+8

-20

+8

+17

-7

+4

+12

-49

-44

+57

-14

+7

+33

+16

-4

+2

CHANGE

310

295

266

267

243

254

221

238

234

211

224

236

235

240

247

215

192

195

170

152

147

140

101

81

129

147

176

190

180

162

159

INFLOW

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

PUTAH

 288

 258

 250

 234

 213

 217

 220

 220

 199

 190

 204

 207

 205

 208

 214

 185

 177

 166

 135

 130

 119

 108

 100

 77

 74

 128

 146

 148

 146

 138

 132

PUTAH

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .18

 .17

 .13

 .13

 .13

 .15

 .24

 .17

 .20

 .20

 .24

 .21

 .27

 .23

 .14

 .15

 .11

 .12

 .17

 .15

 .19

 .15

 .18

 .30

 .26

 .28

 .25

 .13

 .15

 .29

 .14

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2003 RUN DATE: 11/24/2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +37 6,257 5,436 775 25 5.81 .00

ACRE-FEET +37 12,411 10,782 1,537 50

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,537

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 10,782

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2003 .28

 643

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
### §4507. Federal control of education prohibited

Nothing contained in this chapter may be construed to authorize any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction or research, administration, or personnel of any educational institution.

(Pub. L. 98–164, title VIII, §808, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1050.)