alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1



                     COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                            OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                   ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                 CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-25T1
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-25T1


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                     Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                     Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 25, 2018

Order 

Clerk

July 25, 2018

153696(54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 153696

v COA: 325449 ` Gratiot CC: 14-007061-FH

DAVID ALLEN SNYDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted 

for filing if submitted on or before September 25, 2018.
§ 686.340 How are entities selected to receive funding to provide outreach and admission, career transition and other operations support services? ( a ) The Secretary selects eligible entities to provide outreach and admission, career transition, and operational services on a competitive basis in accordance with applicable statutes and regulations. In selecting an entity, the Secretary issues requests for proposals (RFP) for operational support services according to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1) and Department of Labor Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 29). The Secretary develops RFPs for operational support services in consultation with the Governor, the center workforce council (if established), and the Local WDB for the workforce development area in which the center is located.
( b ) The RFP for each support service contract describes uniform specifications and standards, as well as specifications and requirements that are unique to the specific required operational support services.
( c ) The contracting officer selects and funds operational support service contracts on the basis of an evaluation of the proposals received using criteria established by the Secretary and set forth in the RFP. The criteria may include the following, as applicable: ( 1 ) The ability of the offeror to coordinate the activities carried out in relation to the Job Corps center with related activities carried out under the appropriate State Plan and local plans;
( 2 ) The ability of the entity to offer career technical training that has been proposed by the workforce council and the degree to which the training reflects employment opportunities in the local areas in which most of the students intend to seek employment;
( 3 ) The degree to which the offeror demonstrates relationships with the surrounding communities, including employers, labor organizations, State WDBs, Local WDBs, applicable one-stop centers, and the State and region in which the services are provided;
( 4 ) The offeror's past performance, if any, relating to providing services to a Job Corps center, including information regarding the offeror in any reports developed by the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Labor and the offeror's demonstrated effectiveness in assisting individuals in achieving the indicators of performance for eligible youth described in sec. 116(b)(2)(A)(ii) of WIOA, listed in § 686.1010;
( 5 ) The offeror's ability to demonstrate a record of successfully assisting at-risk youth to connect to the workforce; and
( 6 ) Any other information on additional selection factors required by the Secretary.
[81 FR 56443, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 84 FR 64740, Nov. 25, 2019]
§ 684.650 Can Indian and Native American grantees exclude segments of the eligible population? ( a ) No, INA program grantees cannot exclude segments of the eligible population except as otherwise provided in this part. INA program grantees must document in their 4-year plan that a system is in place to afford all members of the eligible population within the service area for which the grantee was designated an equitable opportunity to receive WIOA services and activities.
( b ) Nothing in this section restricts the ability of INA program grantees to target subgroups of the eligible population (for example, the disabled, substance abusers, TANF recipients, or similar categories), as outlined in an approved 4-year plan. However, it is unlawful to target services to subgroups on grounds prohibited by WIOA sec. 188 and 29 CFR part 38, including tribal affiliation (which is considered national origin). Outreach efforts, on the other hand, may be targeted to any subgroups.
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Catherine M. Mascher et al., as Trustees under the Will of John Ewald, Deceased, Respondents-Appellants. Grace E. Odom et al., Appellants; Charles Margett, as Special Guardian for Jane M. Odom, an Infant, Appellant-Respondent.

Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston and Lewis, JJ., concur; Adel, J., concurs except as to so much of the determination as surcharges the trustees, as to which he dissents and in that respect votes to affirm the decree, with the following memorandum: In my opinion, upon the proof contained in the record in this case it may not he held that the creation of the mortgage in the manner in which it was evolved, upon the only unencumbered real estate left by the decedent, is violative of the injunction against trustees purchasing securities from themselves.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.999 What is expedited reinstatement?

The expedited reinstatement provision provides you another option for regaining eligibility for benefits when we previously terminated your eligibility for disability benefits due to your work activity. The expedited reinstatement provision provides you the option of requesting that your prior eligibility for disability benefits be reinstated, rather than filing a new application for a new period of eligibility. Since January 1, 2001, you can request to be reinstated to benefits if you stop doing substantial gainful activity within 60 months of your prior termination. You must not be able to do substantial gainful activity because of your medical condition. Your current impairment must be the same as or related to your prior impairment and you must be disabled. To determine if you are disabled, we will use our medical improvement review standard that we use in our continuing disability review process. The advantage of using the medical improvement review standard is that we will generally find that you are disabled unless your impairment has improved so that you are able to work or unless an exception under the medical improvement review standard process applies. We explain the rules for expedited reinstatement in §§ 416.999a through 416.999d.

[70 FR 57144, Sept. 30, 2005]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               MARWICH II, LTD.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Schumacher, President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Daniel Charles Jackson, * From the 32nd District Court

of Nolan County,

Trial Court No. 12587.

Vs. No. 11-18-00310-CR * November 19, 2020

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, S.C.J. 

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
### §290l–8. Congressional consultations

During negotiations on the establishment of operational guidelines for the Bank, the Secretary of the Treasury shall—

(A) consult on a regular and timely basis with the Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;

(B) seek to ensure that procedures and mechanisms are established, including the creation of specific departments or staffs within the Bank, which will allow the Bank to assess the impact of any loans, guarantees, or other activities on the environment and on internationally recognized human rights in borrower countries; and

(C) report, through consultation within 90 days after November 5, 1990, to the Committees specified in subparagraph (A) on the progress of efforts to create such procedures and mechanisms.

(Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(c)(11), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2036.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs of House of Representatives treated as referring to Committee on Banking and Financial Services of House of Representatives by section 1(a) of Pub. L. 104–14, set out as a note preceding section 21 of Title 2, The Congress. Committee on Banking and Financial Services of House of Representatives abolished and replaced by Committee on Financial Services of House of Representatives, and jurisdiction over matters relating to securities and exchanges and insurance generally transferred from Committee on Energy and Commerce of House of Representatives by House Resolution No. 5, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Jan. 3, 2001.

#### Goals in Negotiations Concerning Structure, Bylaws, and Operating Procedures of Bank

Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §584, Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2046, provided that: "In all negotiations concerning the structure, bylaws, and operating procedures of the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), the Secretary of the Treasury shall vigorously seek—

"(1) establishment of procedures for environmental assessment of all proposed operations with potentially significant environmental impacts;

"(2) establishment of an environmental unit with sufficient staff to review proposed operations, monitor compliance with environmental provisions, and provide overall policy guidance;

"(3) establishment of procedures for systematic consultation with and involvement of the public and interested nongovernmental organizations, including an opportunity for comment by local communities which may be affected by EBRD operations and establishment of a system of public notification and comment during the development of EBRD policies and operating procedures; and

"(4) agreement that a significant portion of the EBRD's funds shall be devoted to projects focused on environmental restoration and protection."
### §3105. Enforcement

#### (a) Civil penalty for failure to furnish information

Whoever fails to furnish any information required under this chapter, whether required to be furnished in the form of a report or otherwise, or to comply with any rule, regulation, order, or instruction promulgated under this chapter, shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $2,500, and not more than $25,000, in a proceeding brought under subsection (b) of this section.

#### (b) Civil action for failure to furnish information

Whenever it appears that any person has failed to furnish any information required under this chapter, whether required to be furnished in the form of a report or otherwise, or has failed to comply with any rule, regulation, order, or instruction promulgated under this chapter, a civil action may be brought in an appropriate district court of the United States, or the appropriate United States court of any territory or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, and such court may enter a restraining order or a permanent or temporary injunction commanding such person to furnish such information or to comply with such rule, regulation, order, or instruction, as the case may be, or impose the civil penalty provided in subsection (a) of this section, or both.

#### (c) Criminal penalty for failure to submit information

Whoever willfully fails to submit any information required under this chapter, whether required to be furnished in the form of a report or otherwise, or willfully violates any rule, regulation, order, or instruction promulgated under this chapter, upon conviction, shall be fined not more than $10,000 and, if an individual, may be imprisoned for not more than one year, or both, and any officer, director, employee, or agent of any corporation who knowingly participates in such violation, upon conviction, may be punished by a like fine, imprisonment, or both.

(Pub. L. 94–472, §6, Oct. 11, 1976, 90 Stat. 2063; Pub. L. 101–533, §7(b), Nov. 7, 1990, 104 Stat. 2349.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–533 substituted "shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $2,500, and not more than $25,000," for "may be subject to a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000".
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the three months ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  November 14, 2005


BY: /s/ DUANE J. ROTH
    -------------------------------
        Duane J. Roth
        Chief Executive Officer



                                       25
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

Editorial Note on Subpart L of Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart L of part 655 appear at 75 FR 10403, Mar. 5, 2010.

§ 655.1113 Element III—What does “facility wage rate” mean? ( a ) The third attestation element requires that the facility employing or seeking to employ the alien must attest that “the alien employed by the facility will be paid the wage rate for registered nurses similarly employed by the facility.”
( b ) The facility must pay the higher of the wage required in this section (*i.e.* facility wage), or the wage required in § 655.1112 (*i.e.,* prevailing wage).
( c ) *Wage obligations for H-1C nurses in nonproductive status* — ( 1 ) *Circumstances where wages must be paid.* If the H-1C nurse is not performing work and is in a nonproductive status due to a decision by the facility (e.g., because of lack of assigned work), because the nurse has not yet received a license to work as a registered nurse, or any other reason except as specified in paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the facility is required to pay the salaried H-1C nurse the full amount of the weekly salary, or to pay the hourly-wage H-1C nurse for a full-time week (40 hours or such other number of hours as the facility can demonstrate to be full-time employment) at the applicable wage rate.
( 2 ) *Circumstances where wages need not be paid.* If an H-1C nurse experiences a period of nonproductive status due to conditions unrelated to employment which take the nurse away from his/her duties at his/her voluntary request and convenience (e.g., touring the U.S., caring for ill relative) or render the nonimmigrant unable to work (e.g., maternity leave, automobile accident which temporarily incapacitates the nonimmigrant), then the facility is not obligated to pay the required wage rate during that period, *provided that* such period is not subject to payment under the facility's benefit plan. Payment need not be made if there has been a *bona fide* termination of the employment relationship, as demonstrated by notification to USCIS that the employment relationship has been terminated and the petition should be canceled.
( d ) *Documentation.* The facility must maintain documentation substantiating compliance with this attestation element. The public access file shall contain the facility pay schedule for nurses or a description of the factors taken into consideration by the facility in making compensation decisions for nurses, if either of these documents exists. Categories of nursing positions not covered by the public access file documentation shall not be covered by the Attestation, and, therefore, such positions shall not be filled or held by H-1C nurses. The facility must maintain the payroll records, as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act at 29 CFR part 516, and make such records available to the Administrator in the event of an enforcement action pursuant to subpart M of this part.
#### Jack Donald BAXTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Cole JETER, Warden, Federal Medical Center Fort Worth, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-10140.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 23, 2006.

Jack Donald Baxter, Fort Worth, TX, pro se.

. Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jack Donald Baxter, federal prisoner # 03659-078, was convicted in 1992 of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute amphetamine and sentenced to 240 months in prison. He appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, arguing that his sentence was illegal because it was based on facts not submitted to the jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt in violation of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), and *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). He argues that his claims should be allowed to proceed under the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Baxter’s argument is unavailing in light of this court’s decision in *Padilla v. United States,*416 F.3d 424, 426-27 (5th Cir.2005).

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 658.703 Emergency corrective action.

In critical situations as determined by the Regional Administrator, where it is necessary to protect the integrity of the funds, or ensure the proper operation of the program, the Regional Administrator may impose immediate corrective action. Where immediate corrective action is imposed, the Regional Administrator must notify the SWA of the reason for imposing the emergency corrective action prior to providing the SWA an opportunity to comment.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEV

 968.29

 969.32

 970.32

 971.05

 971.63

 972.04

 972.47

 972.86

 973.23

 973.73

 974.16

 974.72

 975.28

 975.97

 976.48

 976.94

 977.43

 977.88

 978.39

 978.82

 979.62

 980.62

 981.68

 984.22

 986.40

 987.85

 989.04

 990.23

 991.18

 2,194.7

 2,213.6

 2,232.0

 2,245.5

 2,256.3

 2,264.0

 2,272.0

 2,279.3

 2,286.3

 2,295.7

 2,303.8

 2,314.4

 2,325.0

 2,338.2

 2,347.9

 2,356.8

 2,366.2

 2,374.9

 2,384.7

 2,393.0

 2,408.6

 2,428.1

 2,449.0

 2,499.3

 2,543.2

 2,572.6

 2,596.9

 2,621.4

 2,641.0

STORAGE

+15.7

+18.9

+18.4

+13.5

+10.8

+7.6

+8.1

+7.3

+7.0

+9.4

+8.1

+10.6

+10.6

+13.1

+9.8

+8.8

+9.4

+8.7

+9.9

+8.3

+15.6

+19.5

+20.8

+50.4

+43.8

+29.4

+24.3

+24.5

+19.7

CHANGE

 9,681

 11,598

 11,185

 8,855

 8,111

 6,506

 6,850

 6,623

 6,459

 7,457

 7,623

 7,935

 8,861

 9,384

 7,298

 7,537

 7,882

 7,337

 7,992

 7,136

 11,367

 12,055

 12,766

 26,567

 23,417

 16,418

 13,594

 13,325

 11,260

INFLOW

 1,741

 1,984

 1,815

 2,036

 2,652

 2,618

 2,764

 2,914

 2,915

 2,667

 3,510

 2,511

 3,410

 2,618

 2,336

 3,027

 3,093

 2,927

 3,011

 2,930

 3,462

 2,185

 2,268

 1,102

 1,263

 1,524

 1,301

 902

 1,268

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 38

 97

 76

 5

 16

 38

 28

 28

 39

 44

 22

 78

 89

 140

 39

 68

 34

 40

 6

 6

 57

 23

 6

 71

 48

 72

 36

 73

 79

C.F.S.

 .07

 .18

 .14

 .01

 .03

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .07

 .08

 .04

 .14

 .16

 .25

 .07

 .12

 .06

 .07

 .01

 .01

 .10

 .04

 .01

 .12

 .08

 .12

 .06

 .12

 .13

INCHES

 1.48

 .20

 2.38

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .02

 2.77

 .26

 2.06

 1.25

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2008 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 8, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +462.0 303,079 68,754 0 0 1,396 2.46 10.44

ACRE-FEET +462,000 601,157 136,374 0 0 2,769

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 136,374

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 136,374

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 10.44

JULY 1, 2007 44.20

 2,179.0

Table 3
#### Gaetano Sciacca, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the Hew York county clerk’s office on the 28th day of May, 1913, on verdict, and also from an order entered on the 27th day of May, 1913, denying a motion for a new trial.

Per Curiam :

The evidence does not sustain the finding that the defendant was negligent. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. •Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Order to be settled on notice.