alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed January 26, 2018.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-00641-CR

BRUCE EDWARD BINGHAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court

Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2-16-057

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck

A jury convicted Bruce Edward Bingham of intoxication manslaughter with a deadly 

weapon, a motor vehicle. During the punishment phase, appellant pleaded true to one 

enhancement paragraph. The jury found the enhancement paragraph true and assessed punishment 

at sixty years’ imprisonment and a $2,000 fine. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in 

which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional 

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether 

brief meets requirements of Anders). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. See Kelly 
–2–

v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting appellant has right to file pro se 

response to Anders brief filed by counsel).

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues. After reviewing counsel’s brief, 

appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. 

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate 

court’s duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the 

appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

170641F.U05

/David J. Schenck/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

BRUCE EDWARD BINGHAM, Appellant

No. 05-17-00641-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District 

Court, Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2-16-057.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck. 

Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered this 26th day of January, 2018.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3842 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                       December 10 (legislative day, December 9), 2016.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
3842) entitled ``An Act to improve homeland security, including 
domestic preparedness and response to terrorism, by reforming Federal 
Law Enforcement Training Centers to provide training to first 
responders, and for other purposes.'', do pass with the following

                              AMENDMENTS:

(1)On page 3, line 19, insert ``delegated'' after ``carry out''.

(2)On page 4, strike lines 5 through 12 and insert the following:
                    ``(B) maximizes opportunities for small business 
                participation;

(3)On page 11, beginning on line 25, strike ``and to compensate such 
employees for time spent traveling from their homes to work sites''.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 3842

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENTS
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Southern Sauce Company Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Robert Jordan, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and
      for
      the periods presented in the Report.




Date:
                March 18, 2008
            By:
                /s/
            Robert
                JordanName:
            Robert
                JordanTitle:
            Chief Executive Officer, President, Directorand Principal Accounting Officer
Order entered December 8 , 2016

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00667

- CV

JOSEPH ABUZAID, Appellant

V.

ANANI, LLC, BIG D CO NCRETE, INC., MUAMAR ANANI AND HANADI ANANI,

Appellee s

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 15

- 06938



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellees’ December 6, 2016 unopposed second mot ion to extend the

time to file appellees’ brief. Appellees ’ motion is GRANTED

. Appellees’ brief shall be filed by

December 20, 2016. We caution appellees that further extensions may not be granted.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
Press Release
[Graphic omitted] Ahold
                                                  Royal Ahold
                                                  Public Relations


                                          Date:   May 13, 2003
                          For more information:   +31 75 659 57 20

Ahold's U.S. Foodservice CEO resigns

Zaandam, The Netherlands, May 13, 2003 - The Supervisory Board of Ahold today
announced that it has accepted the resignation of Jim Miller, President and
Chief Executive Officer of U.S. Foodservice and a member of the Corporate
Executive Board of Ahold.

Mr. Miller has served as President and CEO of U.S. Foodservice since 1997, and
was appointed to the Ahold Corporate Executive Board in 2001. Until a new CEO
for U.S. Foodservice is named, Robert G. Tobin will serve as interim Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Tobin is a member of the Ahold Supervisory Board since
2001. He is the former Chairman and CEO of Stop & Shop, which he joined in 1960.
In 1998 he was appointed President and CEO of Ahold USA as well as to the Ahold
Corporate Executive Board from which he retired in 2001. Mr. Miller has agreed
to assist Mr. Tobin in the transition.

The Supervisory Board has taken this decision in light of the results of the
forensic accounting work conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers, announced by Ahold
on May 8, 2003, which had identified total overstatements of pre-tax earnings of
approximately USD 880 million for the period April 1, 2000 (the date of the
acquisition of U.S. Foodservice) to December 28, 2002 (the end of Ahold's 2002
fiscal year). The internal legal investigation into accounting irregularities at
U.S. Foodservice and the possible involvement of U.S. Foodservice personnel
continues in close cooperation with the PricewaterhouseCoopers' forensic
accounting work.


Ahold Corporate Communications: +31.75.659.57.20


                                                  Albert Heijnweg 1, Zaandam
                                                  P.O. Box 3050, 1500 HB Zaandam
                                                  The Netherlands
                                                  Phone:  +31 (0)75 659 5720
http://www.ahold.com                              Fax:    +31 (0)75 659 8302
### §4902. Fellowship Board

#### (a) Establishment and function

There is hereby established a Fellowship Board (hereafter in this chapter referred to as the "Board"), which shall select the individuals who will be eligible to serve as Fellows.

#### (b) Membership

The Board shall consist of 7 members as follows:

(1) A senior official of the Department of State (who shall be the chair of the Board), designated by the Secretary of State.

(2) An officer or employee of the Department of Commerce, designated by the Secretary of Commerce.

(3) Five academic specialists in international affairs or foreign languages, appointed by the Secretary of State (in consultation with the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives and the chairman and ranking minority 1 of the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate).

#### (c) Meetings

The Board shall meet at least once each year to select the individuals who will be eligible to serve as Fellows.

#### (d) Compensation and per diem

Members of the Board shall receive no compensation on account of their service on the Board, but while away from their homes or regular places of business in the performance of their duties under this chapter, may be allowed travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in the same manner as persons employed intermittently in the Government service are allowed expenses under section 5703 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title X, §1003, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 893; Pub. L. 101–454, §9(c)(1), Oct. 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 1066; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIII, §1335(f), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–788.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 105–277, §1335(f)(1), substituted "7 members" for "9 members" in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (b)(3), (4). Pub. L. 105–277, §1335(f)(2)–(4), redesignated par. (4) as (3), substituted "Five" for "Six", and struck out former par. (3) which read as follows: "An officer or employee of the United States Information Agency, designated by the Director of that Agency."

1990—Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 101–454 substituted "international affairs or foreign languages," for "Soviet or Eastern European area studies or languages,".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–277 effective Oct. 1, 1999, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6531 of this title.

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Pub. L. 101–454, §9(c)(2), Oct. 24, 1990, 104 Stat. 1066, provided that: "The amendment made by paragraph (1) [amending this section] shall apply only to appointments to the Fascell Fellowship Board after the date of the enactment of this section [Oct. 24, 1990] and shall not affect the service of members of such board on the date of the enactment of this section."

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by "member".
### §4193. Protests

Consuls and vice consuls shall have the right, in the ports or places to which they are severally appointed, of receiving the protests or declarations which captains, masters, crews, passengers, or merchants, who are citizens of the United States, may respectively choose to make there; and also such as any foreigner may choose to make before them relative to the personal interest of any citizen of the United States.

(R.S. §1707; June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §39, 62 Stat. 992.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §1707 derived from act Apr. 14, 1792, ch. 24, §2, 1 Stat. 255.

Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 1173 of this title, and prior thereto to section 73 of this title.

#### Amendments

1948—Act June 25, 1948, repealed second sentence relating to authenticated copies of consular acts received as evidence.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1948 Amendment

Act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, §38, 62 Stat. 992, provided that the amendment made by that act is effective Sept. 1, 1948.
# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-7002 September Term, 2020 1: 20-c v -028 83-UNA Filed O n: April 9, 202 1 Huguette Nicole Youn g,

App ellant
v . Muriel Bowser,

App ellee ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Rogers and W ilkins, Circuit Jud ges, an d S ent elle, S enio r Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l was co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief an d a ppe ndix f iled b y

ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P . 34 (a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 3 4(j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s o rder f iled Dece mb er 22 , 202 0, b e a f

f irmed . A ppe llant d oes notdispu te t hatshe failed to co mp ly w ith th e d istrict court’s o rder direct ing her to pa y the f iling fe e o r to su bm it a co mp leted m otion for lea v e to p rocee d in forma pa upe ris (IFP). On app eal, she has prese nte d n o valid argume nts dem onst rating tha t th e requirem enttha t she pa y the f ull district co urt f iling fe e o r f ile a prop erly-supp orted IFP m otion vi olate s he r const itution al rights. Se e 2 8 U.S .C. § 1 915 (a)(1); cf . Ib rahim v. Distr ict of Colum bia, 208 F.3d 10 32, 10 36 (D.C. Cir. 2000 ) (“Leave to f ile a cla im in forma pa upe ris has a lways been a m atte r of grace, a priv ilege grant ed in th e co urt’s discretio n.”). A ccordingly , th e d istrict court a ppro priate ly de nied the m otion for recon siderat ion a nd dism issed t he case.

# U n i ted S t a te s C ou r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 21-7002 September Term, 2020
Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
### §262p–10. Enhancing the transparency and effectiveness of the Inspection Panel process of the World Bank

#### (a) Enhancing transparency in implementation of Management Action Plans

The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Directors at the World Bank to seek to ensure that World Bank Procedure 17.55, which establishes the operating procedures of Management with regard to the Inspection Panel, provides that Management prepare and make available to the public semiannual progress reports describing implementation of Action Plans considered by the Board; allow and receive comments from Requesters and other Affected Parties for two months after the date of disclosure of the progress reports; post these comments on World Bank and Inspection Panel websites (after receiving permission from the requestors to post with or without attribution); submit the reports to the Board with any comments received; and make public the substance of any actions taken by the Board after Board consideration of the reports.

#### (b) Safeguarding the independence and effectiveness of the Inspection Panel

The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Directors at the World Bank to continue to promote the independence and effectiveness of the Inspection Panel, including by seeking to ensure the availability of, and access by claimants to, the Inspection Panel for projects supported by World Bank resources.

#### (c) Evaluation of country systems

The Secretary of the Treasury shall direct the United States Executive Directors at the World Bank to request an evaluation by the Independent Evaluation Group on the use of country environmental and social safeguard systems to determine the degree to which, in practice, the use of such systems provides the same level of protection at the project level as do the policies and procedures of the World Bank.

#### (d) World Bank defined

In this section, the term "World Bank" means the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Development Association.

(Pub. L. 95–118, title XVI, §1627, as added Pub. L. 111–32, title XI, §1110, June 24, 2009, 123 Stat. 1902.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 262p–5 of this title apply to this section.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 252.55

 252.50

 252.54

 252.51

 252.55

 252.54

 252.51

 252.53

 252.50

 252.51

 252.49

 252.55

 252.60

 252.57

 252.51

 252.53

 252.50

 252.52

 252.51

 252.55

 252.53

 252.50

 252.54

 252.51

 252.52

 252.54

 252.57

 252.60

 252.49

 252.52

 252.49

 3,948

 3,924

 3,943

 3,928

 3,948

 3,943

 3,928

 3,938

 3,924

 3,928

 3,919

 3,948

 3,973

 3,958

 3,928

 3,938

 3,924

 3,933

 3,928

 3,948

 3,938

 3,924

 3,943

 3,928

 3,933

 3,943

 3,958

 3,973

 3,919

 3,933

 3,919

STORAGE

+20

-24

+19

-15

+20

-5

-15

+10

-14

+4

-9

+29

+25

-15

-30

+10

-14

+9

-5

+20

-10

-14

+19

-15

+5

+10

+15

+15

-54

+14

-14

CHANGE

 758

 776

 878

 1,000

 1,112

 1,112

 930

 1,299

 859

 778

 1,019

 997

 993

 925

 960

 656

 519

 1,109

 1,146

 818

 1,033

 718

 861

 801

 803

 889

 823

 894

 647

 913

 956

 13,230

 12,870

 12,870

 12,750

 12,990

 12,990

 12,750

 12,990

 13,350

 13,590

 13,230

 13,230

 13,950

 13,830

 13,830

 13,950

 13,710

 13,590

 14,070

 13,950

 14,190

 14,070

 14,190

 13,830

 14,190

 14,070

 13,470

 13,470

 13,470

 12,870

 12,750

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2002 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 20, 2002

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -9 27,982 418,290

ACRE-FEET -9 55,502 829,678

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 889,097

 3,928

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 41

 85

 78

 65

 57

 66

 59

 48

 79

 81

 69

 67

 93

 62

 35

 63

 67

 66

 80

 77

 56

 32

 74

 65

 63

 61

 46

 50

 48

 75

 67

 1,975

 3,917

CORNING CANAL 3,917

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 55,502

TO SACTO RIVER 829,678

Table 9
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the three-month period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                           The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 13, 2004 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|--------------|-------------------------|--------|
|         | **Michael L. Paxton**   |
|         | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.20

 129.99

 129.96

 129.93

 129.73

 129.53

 129.66

 129.76

 129.75

 130.27

 130.71

 130.48

 130.27

 130.21

 130.21

 130.36

 130.39

 130.44

 130.35

 130.19

 130.16

 130.14

 130.20

 130.29

 130.34

 130.37

 130.43

 130.21

 130.01

 129.82

 601

 580

 577

 573

 554

 534

 547

 556

 556

 609

 657

 631

 609

 602

 602

 619

 622

 627

 618

 600

 597

 595

 601

 611

 616

 620

 626

 602

 582

 562

STORAGE

+0

-21

-3

-4

-19

-20

+13

+9

+0

+53

+48

-26

-22

-7

+0

+17

+3

+5

-9

-18

-3

-2

+6

+10

+5

+4

+6

-24

-20

-20

CHANGE

49

54

58

54

40

46

67

65

56

67

99

83

79

71

73

65

52

53

45

48

59

60

60

60

58

54

53

39

40

40

INFLOW

 23

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 60

 75

 65

 50

 50

 36

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

PUTAH

 25

 40

 35

 31

 25

 31

 35

 35

 31

 15

 15

 21

 25

 25

 23

 20

 20

 20

 20

 26

 30

 30

 27

 25

 25

 22

 20

 20

 20

 20

PUTAH

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .24

 .10

 .07

 .09

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .01

 .04

 .10

 .06

 .09

 .05

 .01

 .04

 .03

 .01

 .19

 .24

 .19

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .02

 .07

 .20

 .12

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .62

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .31

 .55

 1.28

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .61

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2004 RUN DATE: 12/02/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -39 1,747 757 1,004 5 2.35 3.46

ACRE-FEET -39 3,465 1,502 1,991 10

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,991

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 1,502

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.46

JULY 1, 2004 6.77

 601

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK