alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 441.15

 442.06

 443.00

 444.29

 446.04

 447.25

 448.45

 449.76

 450.87

 452.12

 453.34

 454.50

 455.67

 457.07

 458.72

 460.05

 461.41

 462.64

 463.97

 465.43

 466.78

 468.27

 469.51

 470.67

 471.84

 473.10

 474.37

 475.97

 477.40

 478.83

 480.24

 885,859

 894,619

 903,698

 916,208

 933,271

 945,130

 956,941

 969,890

 980,908

 993,365

 1,005,574

 1,017,227

 1,029,027

 1,043,204

 1,059,995

 1,073,594

 1,087,558

 1,100,238

 1,114,003

 1,129,176

 1,143,266

 1,158,882

 1,171,931

 1,184,179

 1,196,575

 1,209,969

 1,223,519

 1,240,656

 1,256,076

 1,271,536

 1,286,842

STORAGE

+8,635

+8,760

+9,079

+12,510

+17,063

+11,859

+11,811

+12,949

+11,018

+12,457

+12,209

+11,653

+11,800

+14,177

+16,791

+13,599

+13,964

+12,680

+13,765

+15,173

+14,090

+15,616

+13,049

+12,248

+12,396

+13,394

+13,550

+17,137

+15,420

+15,460

+15,306

CHANGE

3,723

3,807

4,594

5,975

9,050

5,476

6,185

6,732

5,425

6,652

6,320

6,293

6,131

7,695

9,030

7,064

7,060

6,213

7,524

8,048

7,559

8,255

7,010

6,531

6,520

7,257

7,235

9,331

8,274

8,230

8,184

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 103

 83

 85

 78

 76

 91

 91

 91

 96

 99

 96

 95

 98

 99

 101

 74

 48

 46

 46

 58

 81

 81

 84

 78

 73

 80

 85

 80

 76

 76

 69

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+734

+693

+68

+410

-371

+594

-139

-112

+226

-273

-69

-323

-84

-448

-464

-135

+28

+225

-538

-340

-375

-300

-347

-279

-198

-425

-319

-611

-425

-360

-398

OR

 28

 16

 0

 0

 0

 6

 51

 0

 23

 13

 6

 10

 13

 26

 59

 17

 17

 10

 13

 17

 14

 48

 0

 14

 31

 7

 31

 7

 35

 4

 28

C.F.S.

 .09

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .16

 .00

 .07

 .04

 .02

 .03

 .04

 .08

 .18

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .05

 .04

 .14

 .00

 .04

 .09

 .02

 .09

 .02

 .10

 .01

 .08

INCHES

 .84

 2.05

 .60

 .91

 .05

 .01

 .12

 .01

 .07

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .12

 .00

 .04

 .18

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR January 30, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

DECEMBER 2019 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +409,618 213,383 0 2,517 0 -4,355 544 1.63 5.23

ACRE-FEET +409,618 423,245 0 4,992 0 -8,638 1,079

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 4,992 TOTAL 4,992

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE = 5.72

 877,224

SPILL 0 5.23

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 5.72
#### In the Matter of Ervin Palmer, Respondent, against Alan A. Nickelsburg, as Vice-President of Morelite Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, and Sabine Zoltan, as Secretary of Morelite Co., Inc., Respondent.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7835

In Re: RODNEY H. WILLIAMS, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (CR-01-231) Submitted: January 13, 2005 Decided: January 21, 2005 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney H. Williams, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Rodney H. Williams petitions for writ of mandamus alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on motions filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) case. Williams seeks an order from this court d irecting the court to act. Although we find mandamus relief is not warranted because the district court has recently taken significant action in the case, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 681.230 What does “school” refer to in the “not attending or attending any school” in the out-of-school and in-school eligibility criteria?

In general, the applicable State law for secondary and postsecondary institutions defines “school.” However, for purposes of WIOA, the Department does not consider providers of adult education under title II of WIOA, YouthBuild programs, the Job Corps program, high school equivalency programs, or dropout re-engagement programs to be schools. Therefore, in all cases except the one provided below, WIOA youth programs may consider a youth to be an OSY for purposes of WIOA youth program eligibility if he or she attend adult education provided under title II of WIOA, YouthBuild, Job Corps, high school equivalency programs, or dropout re-engagement programs regardless of the funding source of those programs. Youth attending high school equivalency programs funded by the public K-12 school system who are classified by the school system as still enrolled in school are an exception; they are considered ISY.
94°32' 94°31' 94°30' 94°29' 94°28' 

39°01' 

39°02' 

39°03' 

39°04' 

39°05' 

39°06' 

39°07' 

39°08' 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Prepared in cooperation with the 

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2006–5089

Blue Parkway gage, stage elevation of 754 feet—PLATE 4.3

Kelly, B.P., Rydlund, P.H., Jr., 2006

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

By

Brian P. Kelly and Paul H. Rydlund, Jr.

2006

* #

* #

* #

* #

* #

A B C D E F 

13 

12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

39°00' 

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003 

 and City of Kansas City, Missouri, digital data, 1:833, 2004

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

EXPLANATION

WATER DEPTH, IN FEET, AT STAGE ELEVATION 

 OF 754 FEET AT BLUE PARKWAY GAGE 

 >, greater than

 0 to 1

 >1 to 2

 >2 to 5

 >5 to 10

 >10

LAND SURFACE BELOW RIVER STAGE

 (levee protected or unconnected to river)

STUDY AREA

GAGE OR FLOOD-FORECAST LOCATION

 (ALERT, Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time)

# *

BLUE RIVER FLOOD INUNDATION

0 0.5 1 KILOMETER 

0 0.5 1 MILE 

FORECAST LOCATION STAGE STAGE ELEVATION 

12TH STREET 25.7 740.1

HIGHWAY 40 21.7 743.3

STADIUM DRIVE 26.5 744.8

BLUE PARKWAY 31.5 754.0 

63RD STREET 46.0 767.8 

I - 435 

I-435 

Hawthorne Road 

 Trafficway 

Clary Boulevard 

I-70 

23rd Street 

U S Highway 40 

17th Street 

Road I - 435 

R

a

yto

wn

Coal Mine Road

Van Brunt 

Boulevard

Avenue 

Hard

esty

63rd Steet Brighton

L

ewis

R

oad

67th

Street

Manchester

Gregory Boulevard

Drive Crest

A

venue

U.S. Geological Survey 

stage gage at 12th Street 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at Blue Parkway 

National Weather Service

flood-forecast location 

at Highway 40

U.S. Geological Survey streamflow 

gage at Stadium Drive 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at 63rd Street
February 2022

Day

Shasta 

Inflow

C.F.S.

1

Prev Day

F.C. Par

(Col. 3)

X .95

2

F.C

Param

(Cols. 1+2)

3

.0356*

X Days

12/23 Thru

3/20

4

530,000

Minus

F.C.

Param

(Col 3)

5

Cols

4x5

6

F.C.

Reserv

(1,300,000 - 

Col 6)

7

Minus 

14,943

Per Day

After

3/20

8

Adjusted

F.C.

Reserv

(7-8)

Perm

Storage

130,811

1 4,161 124,270 128,431 1.4240 401,569 571,834 728,166 3,824,000

2 4,691 122,010 126,701 1.4596 403,300 588,656 711,344 3,841,000

3 4,750 120,366 125,116 1.4952 404,885 605,383 694,617 3,857,000

4 4,473 118,860 123,333 1.5308 406,667 622,526 677,474 3,875,000

5 4,559 117,166 121,725 1.5664 408,275 639,522 660,478 3,892,000

6 4,924 115,639 120,563 1.6020 409,437 655,918 644,082 3,908,000

7 4,292 114,535 118,827 1.6376 411,173 673,337 626,663 3,925,000

8 4,012 112,885 116,897 1.6732 413,103 691,203 608,797 3,943,000

9 4,245 111,053 115,298 1.7088 414,703 708,644 591,356 3,961,000

10 4,573 109,533 114,106 1.7444 415,894 725,486 574,514 3,977,000

11 4,731 108,400 113,131 1.7800 416,869 742,026 557,974 3,994,000

12 4,591 107,475 112,066 1.8156 417,934 758,802 541,198 4,011,000

13 4,359 106,462 110,821 1.8512 419,179 775,983 524,017 4,028,000

14 4,722 105,280 110,002 1.8868 419,998 792,452 507,548 4,044,000

15 5,491 104,502 109,993 1.9224 420,000 807,408 492,592 4,059,000

16 7,555 104,494 112,049 1.9580 417,952 818,349 481,651 4,070,000

17 5,394 106,446 111,840 1.9936 418,160 833,644 466,356 4,086,000

18 1,943 106,248 108,191 2.0292 420,000 852,264 447,736 4,104,000

19 3,021 102,782 105,803 2.0648 420,000 867,216 432,784 4,119,000

20 1,984 100,512 102,496 2.1004 420,000 882,168 417,832 4,134,000

21 3,578 97,372 100,950 2.1360 420,000 897,120 402,880 4,149,000

22 2,604 95,902 98,506 2.1716 420,000 912,072 387,928 4,164,000

23 3,973 93,581 97,554 2.2072 420,000 927,024 372,976 4,179,000

24 3,828 92,676 96,504 2.2428 420,000 941,976 358,024 4,194,000

25 3,565 91,679 95,244 2.2784 420,000 956,928 343,072 4,209,000

26 3,990 90,482 94,472 2.3140 420,000 971,880 328,120 4,224,000

27 3,614 89,748 93,362 2.3496 420,000 986,832 313,168 4,239,000

28 3,383 88,694 92,077 2.3852 420,000 1,001,784 298,216 4,254,000

Comments: 

* LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) ) 

IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Shasta Flood Control Requirements

Run Date: 4/19/2023
#### § 498.101 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Agency* means the Social Security Administration.

*Assessment* means the amount described in § 498.104, and includes the plural of that term.

*Commissioner* means the Commissioner of Social Security or his or her designees.

*Department* means the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

*General Counsel* means the General Counsel of the Social Security Administration or his or her designees.

*Inspector General* means the Inspector General of the Social Security Administration or his or her designees.

*Material fact* means a fact which the Commissioner of Social Security may consider in evaluating whether an applicant is entitled to benefits under title II or eligible for benefits or payments under title VIII or title XVI of the Social Security Act.

*Otherwise withhold disclosure* means the failure to come forward to notify the SSA of a material fact when such person knew or should have known that the withheld fact was material and that such withholding was misleading for purposes of determining eligibility or Social Security benefit amount for that person or another person.

*Penalty* means the amount described in § 498.103 and includes the plural of that term.

*Person* means an individual, organization, agency, or other entity.

*Respondent* means the person upon whom the Commissioner or the Inspector General has imposed, or intends to impose, a penalty and assessment, as applicable.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services or his or her designees.

*SSA* means the Social Security Administration.

*SSI* means Supplemental Security Income.

[60 FR 58226, Nov. 27, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 18079, Apr. 24, 1996; 71 FR 28580, May 17, 2006]
EXHIBIT 31.1
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Marwich II, Ltd.

2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.    The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: February 14, 2006


/s/ Peter Porath
----------------------------------------
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 55

 57

 60

 57

 54

 55

 55

 56

 56

 56

 58

 64

 65

 64

 64

 76

 65

 63

 62

 62

 61

 62

 62

 62

 62

 62

 0

 0

 0

 61

 54

 54

 57

 54

 53

 54

 54

 55

 54

 55

 55

 58

 63

 62

 62

 63

 62

 61

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 61

 61

 0

 0

 0

 59

 54

 56

 59

 55

 54

 54

 54

 55

 55

 55

 56

 61

 64

 63

 63

 65

 63

 62

 61

 61

 61

 61

 61

 61

 61

 61

 0

 0

 0

 59

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 5, 2017

HIGH LOW MEAN

 54.5

 54.0

 54.9

 54.9

 53.7

 53.0

 52.8

 53.0

 53.8

 53.8

 53.4

 53.5

 53.6

 54.9

 54.5

 55.2

 54.8

 53.5

 52.1

 53.2

 54.2

 54.3

 55.1

 56.0

 56.2

 55.7

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 52.1

 53.1

 53.2

 53.2

 53.7

 52.8

 52.1

 52.0

 52.2

 52.8

 52.9

 52.6

 52.2

 52.0

 53.5

 53.9

 54.1

 53.6

 52.2

 50.9

 51.9

 53.3

 53.0

 53.6

 54.8

 55.3

 55.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 50.9

 53.8

 53.6

 54.1

 54.2

 53.3

 52.5

 52.4

 52.5

 53.3

 53.4

 52.9

 52.8

 52.8

 54.2

 54.2

 54.4

 54.2

 52.8

 51.5

 52.5

 53.7

 53.7

 54.4

 55.4

 55.7

 55.5

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 51.5

HIGH LOW MEAN

 10.4

 10.3

 10.1

 10.5

 10.5

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.2

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 9.9

 9.9

 10.3

 10.5

 10.5

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 10.8

 10.2

 10.0

 9.9

 10.2

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.1

 9.4

 9.5

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 10.0

 10.3

 10.2

 10.1

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 10.1

 10.3

 10.2

 10.1

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.6

 10.5

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.8

 10.2

 10.5

 10.4

 10.2

 10.2

 10.2

 10.0

 9.9

 9.9

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 10.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
#### Albert J. Viele, Appellant, v. Rochester Transit Corporation, Respondent.

• Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment is for defendant for no cause of action in a bus line negligence action. The order denies plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.) Present — Taylor, P. J., Harris, McCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3134-3135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-995]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD; FRL-9254-6]

Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB) Meeting Dates and 
Agenda

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of teleconference and face-to-face meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency's Environmental Laboratory 
Advisory Board (ELAB), as previously announced, holds teleconference 
meetings the third Wednesday of each month at 1 p.m. ET and two face-
to-face meetings each calendar year. For 2011, teleconference only 
meetings will be February 16, 2011 at 1 p.m. ET; March 16, 2011 at 1 
p.m. ET; April 20, 2011 at 1 p.m. ET; May 18, 2011 at 1 p.m. ET; June 
15, 2011 at 1 p.m. ET; July 20, 2011 at 1 p.m. ET; September 21, 2011 
at 1 p.m. ET; October 19, 2011 at 1 p.m. ET; November 16, 2011 at 1 
p.m. ET; and December 21, 2011 at 1 p.m. ET to discuss the ideas and 
views presented at the previous ELAB meetings, as well as new business. 
Items to be discussed by ELAB over these coming meetings include: (1) 
Issues in continuing the

[[Page 3135]]

expansion of national environmental accreditation; (2) ELAB support to 
the Agency on issues relating to measurement and monitoring for all 
programs; and (3) follow-up on some of ELAB's past recommendations and 
issues. In addition to these teleconferences, ELAB will be hosting 
their two face-to-face meetings on January 31, 2011 at the Hyatt 
Regency Savannah in Savannah, GA at 1:30 p.m. (ET) and on August 15, 
2011 at the Hyatt Regency Bellevue in Bellevue, WA at 9 a.m. (PT). 
Teleconference lines will also be available for these meetings.
    Written comments on laboratory accreditation issues and/or 
environmental monitoring or measurement issues are encouraged and 
should be sent to Ms. Lara P. Autry, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. 
EPA (E243-05), 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, or e-mailed to [email protected]. Members of the public are 
invited to listen to the teleconference calls, and time permitting, 
will be allowed to comment on issues discussed during the ELAB 
meetings. Those persons interested in attending should call Lara P. 
Autry on (919) 541-5544 to obtain teleconference information. For 
information on access or services for individuals with disabilities or 
to request accommodation of a disability, please contact Lara P. Autry 
on the number above, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, 
to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: January 3, 2011.
Kevin Teichman,
Acting EPA Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2011-995 Filed 1-13-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### § 259.5 Appeals from decisions of the Board.

A party who claims to be aggrieved by a decision of the Board under this part may obtain review of such decision by filing a petition for review in the United States court of appeals for the circuit in which the party resides or has its principal place of business or principal executive office, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, or in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The petition for review must be filed within 90 days following the date on which the notice of the Board's decision was mailed to that party.

[43 FR 56889, Dec. 5, 1978. Redesignated at 57 FR 4366, Feb. 5, 1992]
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-171096) and Amendment No. 474 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 2, 2018, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2018, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.


 


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 13, 2018
NISTIR 6585

Input Data for Multizone Airflow and

IAQ Analysis

Andrew K. Persily

Elizabeth M. Ivy








































U.S. Department of Commerce

Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary

Technology Administration

Dr. Cheryl L. Shavers, Under Secretary of Commerce for Technology

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Dr. Karen H. Brown, Acting Director

NISTIR 6585

Input Data for Multizone Airflow and

IAQ Analysis

Andrew K. Persily

Elizabeth M. Ivy

Building Environment Division

Building and Fire Research Laboratory

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8633

January 2001
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7768
KENT D. TILLMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MERRY COPLIN, Warden, Maryland Reception, Diagnostic and Classification Center; PATRICIA GOINS, Officer; C. SIMMONS, CCMS II; G. JONES, Correctional Officer, III; WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; JAMES B. MURPHY, Security Chief; APRIL NORTH, Chief Psychiatrist; UNKNOWN INDIVIDUALMEMBERS OF M.R.D.C.C. AND M.H.C. ANNEX CLASSIFICATION TEAMS AND DEPARTMENTS, All Defendants in their official and individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-96- 938-PJM) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 29, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Kent D. Tillman, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Wendy Ann Kronmiller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.23 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tillman v. Coplin , No. CA-96-938-PJM (D. Md. Nov. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED