Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2012 / Notices 3017 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

(a) Estimated number of Applicants/ 

physicians—352/352 

(b) Frequency of response—one time 

(c) Estimated average burden per 

response—75–105 minutes/30 

minutes 

(d) Estimated total reporting burden— 

440–616 hours/176 hours 

(e) Estimated annual cost to 

respondents—Indeterminate 

General description of collection: The 

Reactive Tuberculin Test Evaluation 

Form is used when an Applicant, who 

has received an invitation to serve as 

Volunteer, reports a history of reactivity 

to tuberculosis skin testing or a history 

of BCG vaccination in the Health 

History Form or if a reactivity is 

discovered as part of the Applicant’s 

physical examination. In these cases, 

the Applicant is provided a Reactive 

Tuberculin Test Evaluation Form for the 

treating physician to complete. The 

treating physician is asked to document 

the type and date of a current TB test, 

TB test history, diagnostic tests if 

indicated, treatment history, risk 

assessment for developing active TB, 

current TB symptoms, and 

recommendations for further evaluation 

and treatment. In the case of a positive 

result on the TB test, a chest x-ray is 

also required, along with treatment for 

latent TB. 

• Insulin Dependent Supplemental 

Documentation Form 

(a) Estimated number of Applicants/ 

physicians—8/8 

(b) Frequency of response—one time 

(c) Estimated average burden per 

response—70 minutes/60 minutes 

(d) Estimated total reporting burden— 

9.3 hours/8 hours 

(e) Estimated annual cost to 

respondents—Indeterminate 

General description of collection: The 

Insulin Dependent Supplemental 

Documentation Form is used with 

Applicants, who have received 

invitations to serve as Volunteers, and 

who have reported on the Health 

History Form that they have insulin 

dependent diabetes. In these cases, the 

Applicant is provided an Insulin 

Dependent Supplemental 

Documentation Form for the treating 

physician to complete. The Insulin 

Dependent Supplemental 

Documentation Form asks the treating 

physician to document that he or she 

has discussed with the Applicant 

medication (insulin) management, 

including whether an insulin pump is 

required, as well as the care and 

maintenance of all required diabetes 

related monitors and equipment. This 

form assists the Peace Corps in 

determining whether the Applicant will 

be in need of insulin storage while in 

service and, if so, will assist the Peace 

Corps in determining an appropriate 

placement for the Applicant. 

• Prescription for Eyeglasses Form 

(a) Estimated number of Applicants/ 

physicians—2,432/2,432 

(b) Frequency of response—one time 

(c) Estimated average burden per 

response—105 minutes/15 minutes 

(d) Estimated total reporting burden— 

4,256 hours/608 hours 

(e) Estimated annual cost to 

respondents—Indeterminate 

General description of collection: The 

Prescription for Eyeglasses Form is used 

with Applicants, who have received 

invitations to serve as Volunteers, and 

who have reported on the Health 

History Form that they use corrective 

lenses or otherwise have uncorrected 

vision that is worse than 20/40. In these 

cases, Applicants are provided a 

Prescription for Eyeglasses Form for 

their prescriber to indicate eyeglasses 

frame measurements, lens instructions, 

type of lens, gross vision and any 

special instructions. This form is used 

in order to enable the Peace Corps to 

obtain replacement eyeglasses for a 

Volunteer during service. 

Request for Comment: Peace Corps 

invites comments on whether the 

proposed collections of information are 

necessary for proper performance of the 

functions of the Peace Corps, including 

whether the information will have 

practical use; the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the information 

to be collected; and, ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

automated collection techniques, when 

appropriate, and other forms of 

information technology. 

This notice is issued in Washington, DC, 

on January 13, 2012. 

Garry W. Stanberry, 

Acting Associate Director, Management. 

[FR Doc. 2012–1040 Filed 1–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6051–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–66148; File No. SR–C2– 

2012–001] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 

Options Exchange, Incorporated; 

Notice of Filing and Immediate 

Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule 

Change To Amend the Fees Schedule 

January 13, 2012. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on January 5, 

2012, the C2 Options Exchange, 

Incorporated (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) 

filed with the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I, II, and III below, which Items 

have been prepared by the Exchange. 

The Commission is publishing this 

notice to solicit comments on the 

proposed rule change from interested 

persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend the 

Fees Schedule. The text of the proposed 

rule change is available on the 

Exchange’s Web site (http:// 

www.cboe.org/legal), at the Exchange’s 

Office of the Secretary, and at the 

Commission. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of 

and basis for the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to amend its 

Fees Schedule to state that CMI and FIX 

connectivity charges will be charged on 

a per-Login ID basis. Firms may access 

C2 via either a CMI Client Application 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
3018 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2012 / Notices 

3See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66082 

(January 3, 2012) (SR–C2–2011–041). 

4See CBOE Fees Schedule, Section 16. 

5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 

7See CBOE Fees Schedule, Section 16. 

8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

9 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

Server or a FIX Port, depending on how 

their systems are configured. Currently, 

the Exchange assesses a fee for each CMI 

Client Application Server or FIX Port. 

However, a firm may have many users, 

using different Login IDs, accessing the 

same CMI Client Application Server or 

FIX Port, allowing the firm to only pay 

the monthly fee once. Alternatively, a 

firm may use the same Login ID to 

access different CMI Client Application 

Servers or FIX Ports, thereby paying 

multiple times for the same Login ID. 

On December 20, 2011, the Exchange 

filed to amend its connectivity fees 

(among other fees) in order to recoup 

some of the costs from recent 

investments made to upgrade the CMI 

Client Application Servers and FIX 

Ports.3 In that filing, the Exchange 

amended such connectivity fees to 

amounts that kept them equivalent to 

those offered on the Chicago Board 

Options Exchange, Incorporated 

(‘‘CBOE’’). CBOE, however, assesses 

CMI and FIX fees on a per-Login ID 

basis.4 The Exchange had intended to 

ensure that C2’s CMI and FIX fees were 

to be assessed on a per-Login ID basis 

as well, but inadvertently failed to make 

such modifications. Without assessing 

such fees on a per-Login ID basis, the 

situations described above, wherein a 

firm may have many users, using 

different Login IDs, accessing the same 

CMI Client Application Server or FIX 

Port, allowing the firm to only pay the 

monthly fee once, and another firm may 

use the same Login ID to access different 

CMI Client Application Servers or FIX 

Ports, thereby paying multiple times for 

the same Login ID, may occur. Further, 

without assessing such fees on a perLogin ID basis, the Exchange will not be 

able to recoup the costs of the 

investments to upgrade the CMI Client 

Application Servers and FIX Ports. As 

such, the Exchange now proposes to 

assess CMI Client Application Server 

and FIX Port costs on a per-Login ID 

basis. 

2. Statutory Basis 

The proposed rule change is 

consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,5

in general, and furthers the objectives of 

Section 6(b)(4) 6 of the Act in particular, 

in that it is designed to provide for the 

equitable allocation of reasonable dues, 

fees, and other charges among C2 

Trading Permit Holders and other 

persons using Exchange facilities. 

Amending the connectivity fees so that 

they are assessed on a per-Login ID basis 

is reasonable because this will allow the 

Exchange to recoup expenditures to 

upgrade the connectivity equipment, 

and because this eliminates 

circumstances wherein a firm may have 

many users, using different Login IDs, 

accessing the same CMI Client 

Application Server or FIX Port, allowing 

the firm to only pay the monthly fee 

once, and another firm may use the 

same Login ID to access different CMI 

Client Application Servers or FIX Ports, 

thereby paying multiple times for the 

same Login ID. Amending the 

connectivity fees so that they are 

assessed on a per-Login ID basis is 

equitable and not unfairly 

discriminatory because such fees will be 

assessed equally to all who use the CMI 

Client Application Servers or FIX Ports, 

and because CBOE currently assesses 

such connectivity fees on a per-Login ID 

basis, and in the same amounts as the 

C2 connectivity fees.7

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

C2 does not believe that the proposed 

rule change will impose any burden on 

competition not necessary or 

appropriate in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The proposed rule change is 

designated by the Exchange as 

establishing or changing a due, fee, or 

other charge, thereby qualifying for 

effectiveness on filing pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 8 and 

subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 9

thereunder. At any time within 60 days 

of the filing of the proposed rule change, 

the Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

C2–2012–001 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–C2–2012–001. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20549, on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also 

will be available for inspection and 

copying at the principal office of the 

Exchange. All comments received will 

be posted without change; the 

Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR–C2– 

2012–001 and should be submitted on 

or before February 10, 2012. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.10

Kevin M. O’Neill, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–1025 Filed 1–19–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES