alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5332. Actions to facilitate creation of Authority

#### (a) In general

No funds, appropriations, contributions, callable capital, financial guarantee, or any other financial support or obligation or contingent support or obligation on the part of the United States Government may be used for the creation, operation, or support of the International Debt Management Authority specified in section 5331 of this title, without the express approval of the Congress through subsequent law, nor shall any expenses associated with such authority, either directly or indirectly, accrue to any United States person without the consent of such person. Except as restricted in the preceding sentence, the Secretary of the Treasury shall review all potential resources available to the multilateral financial institutions which could be used to support the creation of the International Debt Management Authority. In the course of this review, the Secretary shall direct—

(1) the United States Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund to determine the amount of, and alternative methods by which, gold stock of the Fund which, subject to action by its Board of Governors, could be pledged as collateral to obtain financing for the activities of the authority specified in section 5331 of this title; and

(2) the United States Executive Director to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development to determine the amount of, and alternative methods by which, liquid assets controlled by such Bank and not currently committed to any loan program which, subject to action by its Board of Governors, could be pledged as collateral for obtaining financing for the activities of the authority specified in section 5331 of this title.

The Secretary of the Treasury shall include a report on the results of the review in the first report submitted under section 5331(c) of this title.

#### (b) Construction of section

Subsection (a) shall not be construed to affect any provision of the Articles of Agreement of the International Monetary Fund or of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development or any agreement entered into under either of such Agreements.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3112, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1378.)
#### § 404.390 General.

If a person is fully or currently insured when he or she dies, a lump-sum death payment of $255 may be paid to the widow or widower of the deceased if he or she was living in the same household with the deceased at the time of his or her death. If the insured is not survived by a widow(er) who meets this requirement, all or part of the $255 payment may be made to someone else as described in § 404.392.

[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 21929, May 16, 1983; 61 FR 41330, Aug. 8, 1996]
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.445 Additional employer-conducted recruitment. ( a ) *Requirement to conduct additional recruitment.* The employer may be instructed by the CO to conduct additional reasonable recruitment. Such recruitment may be required at the discretion of the CO where the CO has determined that there is a likelihood that U.S. workers who are qualified will be available for the work.
( b ) *Nature of the additional employer-conducted recruitment.* The CO will describe the precise number and nature of the additional recruitment efforts. Additional recruitment may include, but is not limited to, advertising the job offer on the employer's website or another electronic job search website; advertising with community-based organizations, local unions, or trade unions; or other advertising using a professional, trade, or other publication where such a publication is appropriate for the workers likely to apply for the job opportunity. When assessing the appropriateness of a particular recruitment method, the CO will consider the cost of the additional recruitment and the likelihood that the additional recruitment method(s) will identify qualified and available U.S. workers.
( c ) *Proof of the additional employer-conducted recruitment.* The CO will specify the documentation or other supporting evidence that must be retained by the employer as proof that the additional recruitment requirements were met. Documentation must be retained as required in § 655.456.
### §951. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §551, 60 Stat. 1011, related to appointment of consular agents.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

TERRENCE E. BABB, M.D., 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

CENTRE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; 

GEISINGER CLINIC; PENN STATE 

GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM; ROBIN 

E. OLIVER, M.D.; AND MICHAEL 

CHMIELEWSKI, M.D., 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 516 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED. 

Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### § 10.521 If an employee elects to receive retirement benefits instead of FECA benefits, what effect may such an election have on that employee's entitlement to FECA compensation?

Where an employee is undergoing vocational rehabilitation, or where OWCP is attempting to otherwise place that employee in a suitable job, and that employee elects to receive retirement benefits from the Office of Personnel Management instead of benefits under the FECA, the OWCP may proceed with a loss of wage-earning capacity determination which may reduce FECA entitlement as long as the determination is based on the evidence of record at the time of such election.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.35

 130.93

 130.93

 130.89

 130.91

 130.82

 130.73

 130.60

 130.82

 130.73

 130.78

 130.87

 130.75

 130.80

 130.55

 130.73

 130.59

 130.42

 130.51

 130.46

 130.35

 130.25

 130.57

 130.55

 130.13

 129.94

 130.24

 129.88

 129.56

 129.82

 130.16

 618

 682

 682

 677

 679

 669

 659

 644

 669

 659

 665

 675

 662

 667

 639

 659

 643

 625

 634

 629

 618

 607

 641

 639

 594

 574

 605

 568

 537

 562

 597

STORAGE

-10

+64

+0

-5

+2

-10

-10

-15

+25

-10

+6

+10

-13

+5

-28

+20

-16

-18

+9

-5

-11

-11

+34

-2

-45

-20

+31

-37

-31

+25

+35

CHANGE

284

276

231

241

261

264

256

257

239

212

240

250

249

260

222

212

208

221

253

226

198

173

137

631

131

78

106

49

39

46

44

INFLOW

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 600

 135

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

 26

PUTAH

 262

 217

 204

 217

 233

 242

 234

 238

 199

 190

 210

 218

 229

 230

 209

 175

 189

 203

 222

 202

 178

 153

 94

 32

 19

 62

 64

 42

 29

 7

 0

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .25

 .26

 .22

 .19

 .25

 .28

 .17

 .19

 .20

 .17

 .27

 .40

 .21

 .24

 .26

 .22

 .22

 .17

 .14

 .16

 .03

 .07

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .05

 .08

 .11

 .14

 .10

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .10

 .30

 .26

 .00

 2.76

 4.48

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

OCTOBER 2021 RUN DATE: 11/18/2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -31 6,494 5,003 1,489 19 5.23 7.93

ACRE-FEET -31 12,881 9,923 2,953 38

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,953

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 9,923

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 7.93

JULY 1, 2021 7.96

 628

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2021 TO DATE = 7.93
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LOT$OFF
STORES CORPORATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED
AUGUST 1, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1997
<CASH>                                             453
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      616
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,694
<PP&E>                                           7,442
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,197
<BONDS>                                          4,485
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,271
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,380)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,942
<SALES>                                         22,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,300
<CGS>                                           14,934
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,543)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.49)
        

</TABLE>
(No. 6876

#### Estate of Helen L. Kaiser, Deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Corrections, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 20, 1972.*

Redman, Shearer, O’Brien and Blood, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for. Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4436 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4436

  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to provide for 
    expedited project implementation relating to the comprehensive 
                      Everglades restoration plan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2016

Mr. Hastings (for himself, Mr. Diaz-Balart, and Mr. Clawson of Florida) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to provide for 
    expedited project implementation relating to the comprehensive 
                      Everglades restoration plan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Everglades for the Next Generation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN.

    Section 601(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 
(Public Law 106-541; 114 Stat. 2684) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting ``and subject to 
        paragraph (3)'' after ``subsection (b) or (c)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Expedited project implementation.--After completing a 
        project implementation report prepared in accordance with 
        subsections (f) and (h), the Secretary may carry out, without 
        any further congressional authorization--
                    ``(A) any project identified in the Plan for which 
                a project implementation report is completed that is in 
                accordance with an integrated delivery schedule 
                approved by the Chief of Engineers and the South 
                Florida Water Management District, in consultation with 
                the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, 
                subject to the condition that the report is completed 
                not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of 
                this paragraph; and
                    ``(B) any group of projects under the Plan that the 
                Secretary determines will provide regional or watershed 
                ecosystem or water supply benefits if the group of 
                projects is constructed in accordance with a project 
                implementation report approved by the Chief of 
                Engineers and the South Florida Water Management 
                District, in consultation with the South Florida 
                Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, not later than 5 
                years after the date of enactment of this paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 81

 80

 85

 85

 86

 78

 88

 88

 77

 72

 72

 94

 92

 93

 109

 103

 102

 94

 99

 111

 97

 101

 97

 107

 106

 105

 98

 106

 106

 108

 101

 78

 77

 79

 82

 77

 77

 75

 74

 71

 70

 70

 69

 77

 75

 80

 76

 76

 75

 77

 84

 82

 82

 80

 80

 89

 89

 87

 86

 88

 86

 84

 79

 78

 82

 83

 82

 77

 77

 80

 73

 71

 71

 77

 83

 78

 90

 85

 82

 80

 87

 95

 87

 85

 84

 87

 92

 94

 91

 91

 93

 91

 89

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 19, 2007

HIGH LOW MEAN

 52.2

 53.1

 53.9

 54.3

 55.5

 55.7

 55.9

 55.9

 55.0

 55.2

 56.0

 57.6

 59.4

 59.3

 59.2

 59.8

 61.2

 60.5

 59.9

 59.3

 59.7

 59.2

 60.6

 61.7

 62.0

 61.5

 59.6

 59.7

 61.5

 62.4

 64.3

 50.8

 51.2

 51.8

 52.6

 53.5

 53.8

 54.1

 54.3

 53.8

 53.1

 53.7

 54.9

 56.0

 56.4

 56.0

 57.1

 57.4

 58.0

 57.2

 57.8

 56.4

 55.8

 56.8

 58.2

 59.3

 59.4

 57.6

 55.7

 56.6

 57.8

 59.6

 51.6

 52.0

 52.7

 53.3

 54.3

 54.6

 54.8

 55.0

 54.4

 54.1

 54.8

 56.1

 57.5

 57.8

 57.7

 58.4

 59.1

 59.2

 58.6

 58.7

 58.0

 57.6

 58.7

 60.1

 60.8

 60.5

 58.7

 57.7

 58.9

 59.9

 61.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.9

 10.0

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.5

 9.4

 8.8

 8.7

 8.7

 10.5

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.3

 9.4

 9.7

 9.5

 9.1

 8.9

 8.8

 8.9

 9.4

 9.2

 9.0

 8.5

 9.7

 9.7

 9.5

 9.5

 9.2

 9.6

 9.4

 9.4

 9.5

 9.4

 9.2

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.2

 8.3

 8.9

 9.1

 9.0

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.0

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.6

 8.9

 8.6

 8.3

 8.1

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.4

 9.0

 8.6

 8.6

 8.5

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.2

 9.1

 9.2

 9.4

 9.2

 8.9

 8.7

 8.5

 8.8

 9.1

 8.9

 8.7

 8.3

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
Exhibit
31.2



MARINA
BIOTECH, INC.

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Amit Shah, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Marina Biotech, Inc.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report.



|By:    | /s/
    Amit Shah                    | 
|------ | ------------------------------------ | 
|Name:  | Amit
    Shah                        | 
|Title: | Chief
    Financial Officer          | 
|       | (Principal
    Financial Officer and | 
|       | Principal
    Accounting Officer)    | 
|Date:  | February
    9, 2018                 |
### §8413. Auditing

#### (a) Assistance authorized

The Inspector General of the Department of State, the Inspector General of the United States Agency for International Development, and the inspectors general of other Federal departments and agencies (other than the Inspector General of the Department of Defense) carrying out programs, projects, and activities using amounts appropriated to carry out this subchapter shall audit, investigate, and oversee the obligation and expenditure of such amounts.

#### (b) Authorization for in-country presence

The Inspector General of the Department of State and the Inspector General of the United States Agency for International Development, after consultation with the Secretary of State and the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, are authorized to establish field offices in Pakistan with sufficient staff from each of the Offices of the Inspector General, respectively, to carry out subsection (a).

#### (c) Authorization of appropriations

#### (1) In general

Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated under section 8412 of this title for each of the fiscal years 2010 through 2014, up to $30,000,000 for each fiscal year is authorized to be made available to carry out this section.

#### (2) Relation to other available funds

Amounts made available under paragraph (1) are in addition to amounts otherwise available for such purposes.

(Pub. L. 111–73, title I, §103, Oct. 15, 2009, 123 Stat. 2069.)
Fourth Meeting of the MV Transformer Working Group

November 20, 2011

Hosted by APPA

Draft Agenda

9:00    Welcome and Introductions

9:15 Discussion of Latest Liquid‐Immersed Analysis Results  

9:45 “Clearing the Air” Conceptual Dicussion

 Relationship between LCC and Dollars/Watt metrics

 Loading assumptions

 Sources of assumptions about energy prices, energy demand, load growth, discount

rates  

 Poles vs pads

 

10:45 Break

11:00 Network/vault definition

11:30 BIL rating proposal

12:30   Lunch ‐ Caucuses

2:00   Either MVDT or Liquid Immersed – Proposals/Negotiation

5:00 Adjourn
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSynergistic Airframe-Propulsion Interactions and Integrations: A White Paper Prepared by the 1996-1997 Langley Aeronautics Technical CommitteeThis white paper addresses the subject of Synergistic Airframe-Propulsion interactions and integrations (SnAPII). The benefits of SnAPII have not been as extensively explored. This is due primarily to the separateness of design process for airframes and propulsion systems, with only unfavorable interactions addressed. The question 'How to design these two systems in such a way that the airframe needs the propulsion and the propulsion needs the airframe?' is the fundamental issue addressed in this paper. Successful solutions to this issue depend on appropriate technology ideas. This paper first details some ten technologies that have yet to make it to commercial products (with limited exceptions) and that could be utilized in a synergistic manner. Then these technologies, either alone or in combination, are applied to both a conventional twin-engine transonic transport and to an unconventional transport, the Blended Wing Body. Lastly, combinations of these technologies are applied to configuration concepts to assess the possibilities of success relative to five of the ten NASA aeronautics goals. These assessments are subjective, but they point the way in which the applied technologies could work together for some break-through benefits.Document ID19980055126Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsYaros, Steven F.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Sexstone, Matthew G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Huebner, Lawrence D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Lamar, John E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*McKinley, Robert E., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Torres, Abel O.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Burley, Casey L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Scott, Robert C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Small, William J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1998Subject CategoryAeronautics (General)Report/Patent NumberL-17723NASA/TM-1998-207644NAS 1.15:207644Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 282-10-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980055126.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024