alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1321 Suspension for not giving us permission to contact financial institutions. ( a ) If you don't give us permission to contact any financial institution and request any financial records about you when we think it is necessary to determine your SSI eligibility or payment amount, or if you cancel the permission, you cannot be eligible for SSI payments (*see* § 416.207) and we will stop your payments. Also, if anyone whose income and resources we consider as being available to you (see §§ 416.1160, 416.1202, 416.1203 and 416.1204) doesn't give us permission to contact any financial institution and request any financial records about that person when we think it is necessary to determine your SSI eligibility or payment amount, or that person cancels the permission, you cannot be eligible for SSI payments and we will stop your payments. We will not find you ineligible and/or stop your payments if the person whose income and resources we consider as being available to you fails to give or continue permission and good cause, as discussed in § 416.207(h), exists.
( b ) We will suspend your payments starting with the month after the month in which we notify you in writing that: ( 1 ) You failed to give us permission to contact any financial institution and request any financial records about you, or
( 2 ) The person(s) whose income and resources we consider as being available to you failed to give us such permission.
( c ) If you are otherwise eligible, we will start your benefits in the month following the month in which: ( 1 ) You give us permission to contact any financial institution and request any financial records about you, or
( 2 ) The person(s) whose income and resources we consider as being available to you gives us such permission.
[68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003]
<PAGE>




                                                               Exhibit 99-B


                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of  Warrantech  Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  December 31, 2002,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Richard F. Gavino,  Executive Vice  President,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Chief
Accounting Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                             /s/  Richard F. Gavino
                             ---------------------------------------
                             Richard F. Gavino
                             Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
                             Chief Accounting Officer and Treasurer

February 11, 2003




                                       25
<PAGE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-50917 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LORENZO MARTINEZ-MIJAREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-00-CR-243-1-FB

- - - - - - - - - - June 15, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lorenzo Martinez-Mijarez appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Martinez argues that his sentence should not have exceeded the two-year maximum sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Martinez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000).No. 00-50917 - 2 - Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Martinez’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is granted.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
§ 667.800 What actions of the Department may be appealed to the Office of Administrative Law Judges? ( a ) An applicant for financial assistance under title I of WIA which is dissatisfied because we have issued a determination not to award financial assistance, in whole or in part, to such applicant; or a recipient, subrecipient, or a vendor against which the Grant Officer has directly imposed a sanction or corrective action, including a sanction against a State under 20 CFR part 666, may appeal to the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ) within 21 days of receipt of the final determination.
( b ) Failure to request a hearing within 21 days of receipt of the final determination constitutes a waiver of the right to a hearing.
( c ) A request for a hearing under this subpart must state specifically those issues in the final determination upon which review is requested. Those provisions of the final determination not specified for review, or the entire final determination when no hearing has been requested within the 21 days, are considered resolved and not subject to further review. Only alleged violations of the Act, its regulations, grant or other agreement under the Act fairly raised in the determination, and the request for hearing are subject to review.
( d ) A request for a hearing must be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor, in accordance with 29 CFR part 18, with one copy to the Departmental official who issued the determination.
( e ) The procedures in this subpart apply in the case of a complainant who has not had a dispute adjudicated under the alternative dispute resolution process set forth in § 667.840 within the 60 days, except that the request for hearing before the OALJ must be filed within 15 days of the conclusion of the 60-day period provided in § 667.840. In addition to including the final determination upon which review is requested, the complainant must include a copy of any Stipulation of Facts and a brief summary of proceedings.
[65 FR 49421, Aug. 11, 2000, as amended at 86 FR 1779, Jan. 11, 2021]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,924

 2,288

 2,235

 2,097

 2,097

 1,949

 1,622

 2,715

 3,508

 2,781

 2,577

 2,065

 2,075

 2,977

 2,294

 1,567

 2,132

 1,821

 1,903

 2,583

 2,657

 2,537

 2,657

 2,096

 1,612

 2,133

 2,730

 2,628

 2,149

 2,475

 3,134

 48,787

 49,126

 48,843

 48,524

 48,090

 47,678

 47,145

 46,329

 46,592

 47,595

 47,857

 47,912

 47,478

 47,076

 47,550

 47,352

 46,473

 46,175

 45,596

 45,124

 45,322

 45,580

 45,711

 45,949

 45,643

 44,892

 44,674

 45,034

 45,279

 45,056

 45,155

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: September 16, 2021

 51,711

 51,414

 51,078

 50,621

 50,187

 49,627

 48,767

 49,044

 50,100

 50,376

 50,434

 49,977

 49,553

 50,053

 49,844

 48,919

 48,605

 47,996

 47,499

 47,707

 47,979

 48,117

 48,368

 48,045

 47,255

 47,025

 47,404

 47,662

 47,428

 47,531

 48,289

 6,491,000

 6,470,000

 6,449,000

 6,427,000

 6,406,000

 6,385,000

 6,363,000

 6,342,000

 6,321,000

 6,300,000

 6,278,000

 6,257,000

 6,236,000

 6,214,000

 6,193,000

 6,172,000

 6,150,000

 6,129,000

 6,108,000

 6,086,000

 6,065,000

 6,044,000

 6,022,000

 6,001,000

 5,980,000

 5,959,000

 5,937,000

 5,916,000

 5,895,000

 5,873,000

 5,852,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 51,355
496 P.2d 1094

#### Hallie C. SANDERS et al., Petitioners, v. Don RUPERT et al., Respondents.

No. 9456.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 2, 1972.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 704, 83 N.M. 706, 496 P.2d 1102, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.81

 130.64

 130.69

 130.52

 130.66

 130.69

 130.76

 130.90

 130.66

 130.71

 130.74

 130.82

 130.79

 130.82

 130.68

 130.71

 130.79

 130.75

 130.77

 130.69

 130.74

 130.85

 130.78

 130.84

 130.76

 130.72

 130.78

 130.88

 130.76

 130.55

 130.84

 668

 649

 655

 635

 651

 655

 663

 678

 651

 657

 660

 669

 666

 669

 654

 657

 666

 662

 664

 655

 660

 673

 665

 671

 663

 658

 665

 676

 663

 639

 671

STORAGE

+3

-19

+6

-20

+16

+4

+8

+15

-27

+6

+3

+9

-3

+3

-15

+3

+9

-4

+2

-9

+5

+13

-8

+6

-8

-5

+7

+11

-13

-24

+32

CHANGE

698

687

639

598

615

631

675

693

649

631

621

604

625

667

647

649

584

542

528

558

605

609

626

583

536

543

594

627

635

605

552

INFLOW

 64

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 68

 54

 48

 45

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 631

 627

 567

 539

 537

 559

 601

 616

 594

 558

 549

 529

 557

 596

 600

 597

 533

 500

 483

 518

 558

 558

 586

 536

 496

 502

 545

 576

 597

 572

 491

PUTAH

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 2

 2

 2

 2

C.F.S.

 .40

 .44

 .37

 .36

 .45

 .57

 .48

 .40

 .41

 .50

 .45

 .48

 .52

 .42

 .37

 .44

 .42

 .42

 .42

 .47

 .41

 .36

 .40

 .40

 .40

 .39

 .43

 .54

 .44

 .44

 .45

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JULY 2020 RUN DATE: 08/06/2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +6 19,056 17,308 1,697 46 13.45 .00

ACRE-FEET +6 37,798 34,330 3,366 91

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 3,366

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 34,330

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2020 .00

 665

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 13.83
Docket No: FAA-2016-3699 Dir ID: 2015-NM-109-AD
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

DC01PD GP 585G82 Part II: Human Exposure and Environmental RAttachment # 003 Section A: Industrial Sites Controlled by GP

Operation Description - SANITIZED

KG TOTAL CHARGE

REFLUX CONDENSER

REACTOR

NeSuW
### §3929b. Cooperation with Office of the Inspector General

#### (a) Administrative discipline

Not later than 30 days after December 27, 2021, the Secretary of State shall make explicit in writing to all Department of State personnel, including the Secretary of State, Department employees, contractors, and political appointees, and shall consider updating the Foreign Affairs Manual and the Foreign Affairs Handbook to explicitly specify, that if any of such personnel does not comply within 60 days with a request for an interview or access to documents from the Office of the Inspector General of the Department, such personnel may be subject to appropriate administrative discipline including, when circumstances warrant, suspension without pay or removal.

#### (b) Report

#### (1) In general

Not later than 180 days after December 27, 2021 and on a quarterly basis thereafter, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of State and the United States Agency for Global Media shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees and the Secretary of State a report in unclassified form detailing the following:

(A) The number of individuals who have failed to comply within 60 days with a request for an interview or access to documents from the Office of the Inspector General pertaining to a noncriminal matter.

(B) The date on which such requests were initially made.

(C) Any extension of time that was voluntarily granted to such individual by the Office of the Inspector General.

(D) The general subject matters regarding which the Office of the Inspector General has requested of such individuals.

#### (2) Form

Additional information pertaining solely to the subject matter of a request described in paragraph (1) may be provided in a supplemental classified annex, if necessary, but all other information required by the reports required under such paragraph shall be provided in unclassified form.

(Pub. L. 117–81, div. E, title LIII, §5323, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2369.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2021 and also as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, and not as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "appropriate congressional committees" as used in this section, see section 5002 of Pub. L. 117–81, set out as a note under section 263c of this title.
### §502. Creation of advisory committees

The President is authorized to create such advisory committees as in his judgment may be of assistance in carrying out the undertakings of this Government under the treaties, resolutions, declarations, and recommendations referred to, but no committee or member thereof shall be allowed any salary or other compensation for services: Provided, however, That they may, within the limits of appropriations made available therefor by the Congress, which appropriations are authorized, be paid their actual transportation expenses and not to exceed $10 per diem in lieu of subsistence and other expenses while away from their homes in attendance upon meetings within the United States under instructions from the Secretary of State.

(Aug. 9, 1939, ch. 616, §2, 53 Stat. 1290.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Termination of Advisory Committees

Advisory committees in existence on Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period following Jan. 5, 1973, and advisory committees established after Jan. 5, 1973, to terminate not later than the expiration of the 2-year period beginning on the date of their establishment, unless in the case of a committee established by the President or an officer of the Federal Government, such committee is renewed by appropriate action prior to the expiration of such 2-year period, or in the case of a committee established by Congress, its duration is otherwise provided by law. See section 1013 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
§ 680.420 What is a “program of training services”? A program of training services is one or more courses or classes, or a structured regimen, that provides the services in § 680.200 and leads to: ( a ) An industry-recognized certificate or certification, a certificate of completion of a registered apprenticeship, a license recognized by the State involved or the Federal government, an associate or baccalaureate degree;
( b ) Consistent with § 680.350, a secondary school diploma or its equivalent;
( c ) Employment; or
( d ) Measurable skill gains toward a credential described in paragraph (a) or (b) of this section or employment.
### §3261. Congressional declaration of policy; Presidential report to Congress

The United States shall endeavor to cooperate with other nations, international institutions, and private organizations in establishing programs to assist in the development of non-nuclear energy resources, to cooperate with both developing and industrialized nations in protecting the international environment from contamination arising from both nuclear and non-nuclear energy activities, and shall seek to cooperate with and aid developing countries in meeting their energy needs through the development of such resources and the application of non-nuclear technologies consistent with the economic factors, the material resources of those countries, and environmental protection. The United States shall additionally seek to encourage other industrialized nations and groups of nations to make commitments for similar cooperation and aid to developing countries. The President shall report annually to Congress on the level of other nations' and groups of nations' commitments under such program and the relation of any such commitments to United States efforts under this title. In cooperating with and providing such assistance to developing countries, the United States shall give priority to parties to the Treaty.

(Pub. L. 95–242, title V, §501, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 148.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 10, 1978, except as otherwise provided and regardless of any requirements for the promulgation of implementing regulations, see section 603(c) of Pub. L. 95–242, set out as a note under section 3201 of this title.

#### Termination of Reporting Requirements

For termination, effective May 15, 2000, of provisions in this section requiring the President to report annually to Congress, see section 3003 of Pub. L. 104–66, as amended, set out as a note under section 1113 of Title 31, Money and Finance, and page 126 of House Document No. 103–7.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Secretary of State responsible for performing functions vested in President under this section, see section 2(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 12058, May 11, 1978, 43 F.R. 20947, set out as a note under section 3201 of this title.
#### LOEW’S INCORPORATED, Appellants, v. Erich WOLFF and Victoria Wolff, Appellees.

No. 13453.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 14, 1954.

Herman F. Selvin, Allen E. Susman, Loeb & Loeb, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Morris E. Cohn, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Erich Wolff.

Harold A. Fendler, Robert W. Lerner, Beverly Hills, Cal., for appellee Victoria Wolff.

Before STEPHENS and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges, and CLARK, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal in an action by Loew’s Incorporated against Erich Wolff and Victoria Wolff.

*652On the grounds and for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion in 101 F.Supp. 981, wherein it is held that “assignment of all rights” in a story-transferring “complete, unconditional and unencumbered title” was not a marketable and perfect title free from reasonable doubt, and that a warranty of marketable title in a sale of literary property will not be applied, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.
### §6961. Establishment of Task Force

There is hereby established a task force on prohibition of importation of products of forced or prison labor from the People's Republic of China (hereafter in this part referred to as the "Task Force").

(Pub. L. 106–286, div. B, title V, §501, Oct. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 903.)