```

[Senate Report 115-132]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                                      Calendar No. 178
115th Congress     }                                     {      Report
                                 SENATE
 1st Session       }                                     {     115-132

======================================================================

 
         ENERGY AND WATER DEVELOPMENT APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2018

                                _______
                                

                 July 20, 2017.--Ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

  Mr. Alexander, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the 
                               following

                                 REPORT

                         [To accompany S. 1609]

    The Committee on Appropriations reports the bill (S. 1609) 
making appropriations for energy and water development and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, 
and for other purposes, reports favorably thereon and 
recommends that the bill do pass.

New obligational authority

Total of bill as reported to the Senate................. $39,267,376,000
Amount of 2017 appropriations...........................  38,450,000,000
Amount of 2018 budget estimate..........................  34,188,515,000
Bill as recommended to Senate compared to--
    2017 appropriations.................................    +817,376,000
    2018 budget estimate................................  +5,078,861,000

                                CONTENTS

                              ----------                              
                                                                   Page

Purpose..........................................................     4
Summary of Estimates and Recommendations.........................     4
Introduction.....................................................     4
Title I:
    Department of Defense--Civil: Department of the Army:
        Corps of Engineers--Civil:
            Investigations.......................................    10
            Construction.........................................    16
            Mississippi River and Tributaries....................    23
            Operations and Maintenance...........................    24
            Regulatory Program...................................    44
            Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program......    44
            Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies................    44
            Expenses.............................................    44
            Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil 
              Works).............................................    45
        General Provisions--Corps of Engineers--Civil............    45
Title II:
    Department of the Interior:
        Central Utah Project Completion Account..................    46
        Bureau of Reclamation:
            Water and Related Resources..........................    48
            Central Valley Project Restoration Fund..............    55
            California Bay-Delta Restoration.....................    56
            Policy and Administration............................    56
        General Provisions--Department of the Interior...........    56
Title III:
    Department of Energy:
        Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy...................    61
        Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability..............    71
        Nuclear Energy...........................................    74
        Fossil Energy Research and Development...................    77
        Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves...................    83
        Strategic Petroleum Reserve..............................    83
        Energy Security and Infrastructure Modernization Fund....    83
        Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve.......................    84
        Energy Information Administration........................    84
        Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup........................    84
        Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning 
          Fund...................................................    85
        Science..................................................    85
        Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy................    91
        Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs..............    91
        Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program.....................    92
        Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program.............    92
        Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program..    92
        Departmental Administration..............................    93
        Office of the Inspector General..........................    94
        Weapons Activities.......................................    96
        Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.........................    98
        Naval Reactors...........................................   100
        Federal Salaries and Expenses............................   101
        Defense Environmental Cleanup............................   101
        Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning 
          Federal Contribution...................................   104
        Other Defense Activities.................................   104
        Power Marketing Administrations:
            Operations and Maintenance, Southeastern Power 
              Administration.....................................   105
            Construction, Rehabilitation, Operations and 
              Maintenance, Western Area Power Administration.....   105
            Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund....   105
        Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: Salaries and 
          Expenses...............................................   105
        General Provisions--Department of Energy.................   130
Title IV:
    Independent Agencies:
        Appalachian Regional Commission..........................   131
        Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board..................   132
        Delta Regional Authority.................................   132
        Denali Commission........................................   132
        Northern Border Regional Commission......................   132
        Nuclear Regulatory Commission............................   133
            Office of Inspector General..........................   135
        Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board.....................   136
    General Provisions...........................................   136
Title V: General Provisions......................................   137
Compliance With Paragraph 7, Rule XVI, of the Standing Rules of 
  the 
  Senate.........................................................   137
Compliance With Paragraph 7(c), Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules 
  of the 
  Senate.........................................................   139
Compliance With Paragraph 12, Rule XXVI, of the Standing Rules of 
  the 
  Senate.........................................................   140
Budgetary Impact of Bill.........................................   141
Comparative Statement of Budget Authority........................   142

                                PURPOSE

    The purpose of this bill is to provide appropriations for 
fiscal year 2018, beginning October 1, 2017, and ending 
September 30, 2018, for energy and water development, and for 
other related purposes. It supplies funds for water resources 
development programs and related activities of the Corps of 
Engineers' civil works program in title I; for the Department 
of the Interior's Bureau of Reclamation and Central Utah 
Project in title II; for the Department of Energy's energy 
research and development activities, including environmental 
restoration and waste management, and atomic energy defense 
activities of the National Nuclear Security Administration in 
title III; and for independent agencies and commissions, 
including the Appalachian Regional Commission, Delta Regional 
Authority, Denali Commission, Northern Border Regional 
Commission, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in title IV.

                SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    The fiscal year 2018 budget estimates for the bill total 
$34,188,515,000 in new budget (obligational) authority. The 
recommendation of the Committee totals $39,267,376,000. This is 
$5,078,861,000 above the budget estimates and $817,376,000 
above the enacted appropriation for the current fiscal year.

                         Subcommittee Hearings

    The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water 
Development held four sessions in connection with the fiscal 
year 2018 appropriations bill. Witnesses included officials and 
representatives of the Federal agencies under the 
subcommittee's jurisdiction.
    The recommendations for fiscal year 2018, therefore, have 
been developed after careful consideration of available data.

                              INTRODUCTION

    The Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water 
Development's allocation totals $38,400,000,000 of net budget 
authority for fiscal year 2018, including adjustments, which 
represents an increase of $629,000,000 over fiscal year 2017. 
Within the amount recommended, $21,000,000,000 is classified as 
defense (050) spending and $17,400,000,000 is classified as 
non-defense (non-050) spending.
    The Committee's constitutional responsibility to oversee 
the Federal Government's expenditure of taxpayer dollars 
requires setting priorities and ensuring these funds are 
executed as Congress has directed. To develop this 
recommendation, the Committee held four budget hearings in June 
2017 to examine the budget requests for the Corps of Engineers, 
Bureau of Reclamation, Department of Energy, National Nuclear 
Security Administration, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 
The hearings provided officials from the agencies with an 
opportunity to present the administration's most pressing 
priorities to the Committee. The Committee also invited and 
received recommendations from Senators and outside witnesses.
    The Committee's recommendation reflects that process and 
includes funding for the highest priority activities across the 
agencies funded in the bill. The recommendation includes funds 
for critical water infrastructure, including our Nation's 
inland waterways, ports, and harbors; agricultural water supply 
and drought relief in the West; groundbreaking scientific 
research and development, including world-class supercomputing; 
support for the Nation's nuclear weapons, non-proliferation, 
and nuclear Navy programs; and critical economic development. 
The Committee did not recommend funding for low-priority 
programs, and rescinded unused funds from prior years.
    Oroville Dam and Dam Safety Evaluations.--The Committee is 
concerned that the failure of the auxiliary and emergency 
spillways at Oroville Dam in California may be indicative of a 
broader flaw in Federal and state evaluations of dam safety. 
The Committee understands that the Oroville Dam Spillway 
Incident Forensic Investigation Team report is expected to be 
released this fall. Within 90 days of the release of this 
report, the Army Corps of Engineers, the Bureau of Reclamation, 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission shall jointly 
brief the Committee on efforts to incorporate lessons learned 
from Oroville into dam inspection protocols across all three 
agencies and their state partners, including an analysis of: 
the Forensic Investigation Team report examining the causes of 
the Oroville Dam spillway failures; the utility of a subsequent 
independent panel to evaluate whether the Corps, the Bureau and 
the Commission should revise their dam safety procedures in 
light of lessons learned from the Oroville incident; whether 
additional safety inspections should be required after large 
storms; whether the projected effects of climate change and 
atmospheric rivers are appropriately considered in safety 
requirements and testing protocols; whether new non-invasive 
structural health monitoring technologies have the potential to 
improve safety inspections; and whether additional actions 
should be taken to ensure the safety of dams without emergency 
spillways, such as Trinity Dam in California.

                                TITLE I

                       CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL

                         DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

                       Corps of Engineers--Civil

                       OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDATION

    The Committee recommends $6,166,400,000 for the Corps of 
Engineer [Corps], an increase of $1,164,400,000 from the budget 
request.
    The Committee recommendation sets priorities by supporting 
our Nation's water infrastructure. Specifically, the Committee 
recommendation provides adequate appropriations to utilize all 
of the estimated fiscal year 2018 revenues from the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund and meets the target prescribed in the 
Water Resources Reform and Development Act [WRRDA] of 2014, as 
amended, for the Corps projects eligible for Harbor Maintenance 
Trust Funds.

                              INTRODUCTION

    The Corps' civil works mission is to provide quality, 
responsive engineering services to the Nation in peace and war. 
Approximately 23,000 civilians and about 290 military officers 
are responsible for executing the civil works mission. This 
bill only funds the civil works functions of the Corps.
    The Corps maintains our inland waterways, keeps our ports 
open, manages a portion of our drinking water supply, provides 
emission free electricity from dams, looks after many of our 
recreational waters, helps manage the river levels during 
flooding, provides environmental stewardship, and provides 
emergency response to natural disasters. The annual net 
economic benefit generated by the Corps' civil works mission is 
estimated to be $109,830,000,000, which equates to a return of 
about $16.60 for every $1 expended.
    The Corps' responsibilities include:
  --navigation systems, including 13,000 miles of deep draft 
        channels, 12,000 miles of inland waterways, 239 lock 
        chambers, and 1,067 harbors which handle over 2.3 
        billion tons of cargo annually;
  --flood risk management infrastructure, including 709 dams, 
        14,700 miles of levees, and multiple hurricane and 
        storm damage risk reduction projects along the coast;
  --municipal and industrial water supply storage at 136 
        projects spread across 25 States;
  --environmental stewardship, infrastructure, and ecosystem 
        restoration;
  --recreation for approximately 370 million recreation visits 
        per year to Corps' projects;
  --regulation of waters under Federal statutes; and
  --maintaining hydropower capacity of nearly 24,000 megawatts 
        at 75 projects.

                         DEEP DRAFT NAVIGATION

    The budget request this year fails to adequately fund our 
Nation's harbors. The Committee is disappointed the 
administration's budget only proposes to spend $965,000,000 
from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund [HMTF], $375,000,000 
below the spending target established by the WRRDA 2014, as 
amended.
    For fiscal year 2018, the Committee recommends an estimated 
$1,340,000,000 for HMTF-related activities meeting the spending 
target established by WRRDA 2014, as amended, which is 
$375,000,000 above the budget request.

                        INLAND WATERWAYS SYSTEM

    The Committee notes that the budget request only proposed 
to spend $26,250,000 of the $105,000,000 estimated to be 
deposited in fiscal year 2018 into the Inland Waterways Trust 
Fund [IWTF]. This would leave an estimated $78,750,000 of 
fiscal year 2018 deposits unspent. The budget request also only 
proposes to fund a single project, Olmsted Lock, and eliminates 
funding for the other three ongoing projects that are already 
under construction and received funding last year. The 
Committee does not support the administration's proposal to 
reform inland waterways financing by increasing the amount paid 
by commercial navigation users of inland waterways, 
particularly when the administration does not propose to spend 
the funding already collected.

                           ADDITIONAL FUNDING

    The Committee has recommended funding above the budget 
request for Investigations, Construction, Operations and 
Maintenance, and Mississippi River and Tributaries. Except for 
funds proposed for new starts, this funding is for additional 
work that either was not included in the administration's 
request or was inadequately budgeted. A study or project may 
not be excluded from evaluation for being ``inconsistent with 
administration policy.''
    The administration is reminded these funds are in addition 
to its budget request, and administration budget metrics shall 
not be a reason to disqualify a study or project from being 
funded. The focus of the allocation process shall favor the 
obligation, rather than the expenditure, of funds for work in 
fiscal year 2018.
    Funding associated with each category may be allocated to 
any eligible study or project, as appropriate, within that 
category; funding associated with each subcategory may be 
allocated only to eligible studies or projects, as appropriate, 
within that subcategory.
    Work Plan.--Not later than 60 days after the date of 
enactment of this act, the Corps shall provide to the 
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress a work 
plan consistent with the following general guidance, as well as 
the specific direction the Committee provides within each 
account: (1) a detailed description of the rating system(s) 
developed and used to evaluate studies and projects; (2) 
delineation of how these funds are to be allocated; (3) a 
summary of the work to be accomplished with each allocation, 
including phase of work; and (4) a list of all studies and 
projects that were considered eligible for funding but did not 
receive funding, including an explanation of whether the study 
or project could have used funds in fiscal year 2018 and the 
specific reasons each study or project was considered as being 
less competitive for an allocation of funds. The Corps is 
directed not to obligate any funding above the budget request 
for studies or projects until the Committees have approved the 
work plan for fiscal year 2018.
    The work plan shall include a single group of new starts 
for Investigations and Construction. None of the funds may be 
used for any item for which the Committee has specifically 
denied funding.
    New Starts.--The recommendation includes six new study 
starts and five new construction starts to be distributed 
across the three main mission areas of the Corps. Of the new 
study starts, two shall be for navigation studies, two shall be 
for flood and storm damage reduction studies, one shall be for 
an additional navigation or flood and storm damage reduction 
study, and one shall be for an environmental restoration study. 
Of the new study starts for navigation, one shall be for a 
Small, Remote, or Subsistence Harbor. Of the new construction 
starts, two shall be for navigation projects, one shall be for 
a flood and storm damage reduction project, one shall be for a 
coastal storm damage reduction project, and one shall be for an 
environmental restoration project.
    Consideration of studies and projects for selection as new 
starts shall not be limited to only those proposed in the 
administration's budget request. As all new starts are to be 
chosen by the Corps, all shall be considered of equal 
importance, and the expectation is that future budget 
submissions will include appropriate funding for all new starts 
selected.
    The Corps shall consider preconstruction engineering and 
design [PED] phase work as a continuation of the investigations 
and by definition, a study is not completed until PED is 
completed. No new start or new investment decision shall be 
required when moving from feasibility to PED. When evaluating 
proposals for new feasibility studies, the Corps is encouraged 
to give priority to those studies with executed Feasibility 
Cost Sharing Agreements and a sponsor with the ability to 
provide any necessary cost share for the study phase. The Corps 
is encouraged to support opportunities to restore critical 
habitat and enhance the Nation's economic development, job 
growth, and international competitiveness.
    A new construction start shall not be required for work 
undertaken to correct a design deficiency on an existing 
Federal project; it shall be considered ongoing work.

                               ASIAN CARP

    The Corps is directed to provide quarterly updates to the 
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on the 
progress and status of efforts to prevent the further spread of 
Asian carp as well as the location and density of carp 
populations, including the use of emergency procedures.
    The Corps shall collaborate with the U.S. Coast Guard, the 
State of Illinois, and members of the Asian Carp Regional 
Coordinating Committee to institute navigation protocols 
identified by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reduce the 
risk of vessels inadvertently carrying aquatic invasive 
species, including Asian carp, through the Electric Dispersal 
Barrier near Romeoville, Illinois and locks and dams in the 
Illinois River. The Committee directs the Corps to institute 
these navigation protocols within a year of enactment of this 
act. The Committee is aware that the Corps and other Federal 
and State agencies are conducting ongoing research on potential 
solutions.

                             REPROGRAMMING

    The Committee is retaining the reprogramming legislation 
provided in the Energy and Water Development and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017.

                          SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE

    Savings and slippage [S&S] is a budgetary term that 
recognizes that nothing ever goes completely as planned. The 
Committee recognizes that many changes may occur between the 
Corps' budget formulation--beginning 22 months before it is 
submitted to the Committee--and when funds are actually 
appropriated. Although the Committee has attempted to identify 
and address changes through coordination with the Corps, the 
Committee realizes that actual appropriations may not be 
enacted until later in the year. Accordingly, the Committee has 
included, as in prior years, a reasonable percentage of S&S 
within Investigations, Construction, and Operations and 
Maintenance as a way to accommodate additional project needs, 
even if funding is insufficient. Upon applying the S&S amounts, 
normal reprogramming procedures shall be undertaken to account 
for schedule slippages, accelerations, or other unforeseen 
conditions.

                   CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING

    The Committee did not accept or include congressionally 
directed spending, as defined in section 5(a) of rule XLIV of 
the Standing Rules of the Senate. However, the Committee has 
recommended additional programmatic funds for Investigations, 
Construction, Operations and Maintenance, and Mississippi River 
and Tributaries to address deficiencies in the budget request. 
In some cases, these additional funds have been included within 
defined categories, as in prior years, and are described in 
more detail in their respective sections below.

                         REPORTING REQUIREMENT

    The Corps shall provide a monthly report to the Committees 
on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress, which includes 
the total budget authority and unobligated balances by year for 
each program, project, or activity, including any prior year 
appropriations.
    The Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) shall 
provide a monthly report to the Committees on Appropriations of 
both Houses of Congress, which includes the total budget 
authority and unobligated balances by year for each activity 
funded in the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army 
(Civil Works) account, including any prior year appropriations.

                             INVESTIGATIONS

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $121,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      86,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     113,465,000

    The Committee recommends $113,465,000 for Investigations, 
an increase of $27,465,000 from the budget request. The 
Committee's recommendation allows the Corps to begin six new 
feasibility study starts.

                              INTRODUCTION

    Funding in this account is used to develop feasibility and 
PED studies to address the Nation's water infrastructure needs, 
in support of project authorization. The Committee recognizes 
that the administration's budget does not provide adequate 
funding for Investigations, and specifically PED funding to 
allow many of America's most important waterways to move 
efficiently from planning to construction. The Committee 
therefore recommends additional funding to be used to 
seamlessly continue feasibility studies into the PED study 
phase.

                               NEW STARTS

    The Corps is directed to designate new starts in accordance 
with the direction in the front matter under the heading 
``Additional Funding''. The Committee is disappointed the 
fiscal year 2017 work plan only utilized one of the six new 
study starts provided in the Energy and Water Development and 
Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017. Because the 
administration's budget request includes funding to complete 26 
studies in fiscal year 2018--15 more than was recommended in 
the fiscal year 2017 budget request--the Committee directs the 
Corps to utilize all of the new starts provided by Congress in 
fiscal year 2018.

                        COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

    The table below displays the budget request and the 
Committee's recommendation for Investigations. Funding is 
classified as either for feasibility or PED studies, as 
indicated in the columns, to provide greater transparency in 
the study phases.

                   CORPS OF ENGINEERS--INVESTIGATIONS
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Budget  estimate          Committee
                             ----------------------    recommendation
        Project title                              ---------------------
                                 FEAS       PED        FEAS       PED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           ALABAMA
 
VILLAGE CREEK, AL...........        288  .........        288  .........
 
           ALASKA
 
KOTZEBUE SMALL BOAT HARBOR,         370  .........        370  .........
 AK.........................
LOWELL CREEK TUNNEL FLOOD           950  .........        950  .........
 DIVERSION, AK..............
SAINT GEORGE HARBOR                 362  .........        362  .........
 IMPROVEMENT, AK............
UNALASKA (DUTCH) HARBOR, AK.        950  .........        950  .........
 
           ARIZONA
 
LITTLE COLORADO RIVER               414  .........        414  .........
 (WINSLOW), AZ..............
LOWER SANTA CRUZ RIVER, AZ..        250  .........        250  .........
 
          ARKANSAS
 
THREE RIVERS, AR............        270  .........        270  .........
 
         CALIFORNIA
 
ALISO CREEK MAINSTEM, CA....        100  .........        100  .........
CORTE MADERA CREEK, CA......        682  .........        682  .........
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS)            260  .........        260  .........
 RESTORATION, CA............
EAST SAN PEDRO BAY ECOSYSTEM        194  .........        194  .........
 RESTORATION, CA............
PORT OF LONG BEACH NAV IMP,         327  .........        327  .........
 CA.........................
SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK               482  .........        482  .........
 PROTECTION (PHASE 3) (GRR),
 CA.........................
YUBA RIVER FISH PASSAGE, CA         819  .........        819  .........
 (ENGLEBRIGHT & DAGUERRE
 POINT DAMS)................
 
    COMMONWEALTH NORTHERN
          MARIANAS
 
ROTA HARBOR MODIFICATIONS,          513  .........        513  .........
 CNMI.......................
TINIAN HARBOR MODIFICATIONS,        514  .........        514  .........
 CNMI.......................
 
          DELAWARE
 
DELAWARE INLAND BAYS AND            700  .........        700  .........
 DELAWARE BAY COAST, DE.....
 
           GEORGIA
 
PROCTOR CREEK WATERSHED,            450  .........        450  .........
 FULTON COUNTY, GA..........
SWEETWATER CREEK, GA........        750  .........        750  .........
 
          ILLINOIS
 
DU PAGE RIVER, IL...........        300  .........        300  .........
 
INTERBASIN CONTROL OF GREAT       1,850  .........      1,850  .........
 LAKES- MISSISSIPPI RIVER
 AQUATIC NUISANCE SPECIES,
 IL, IN, OH & WI (BRANDON
 ROAD)......................
 
            IOWA
 
GRAND RIVER BASIN, IA & MO..      1,000  .........      1,000  .........
 
          MARYLAND
 
CITY OF BALTIMORE, MD.......        200  .........        200  .........
 
         NEW JERSEY
 
NEW JERSEY BACKBAYS, NJ.....        448  .........        448  .........
 
         NEW MEXICO
 
ESPANOLA VALLEY, RIO GRANDE          65  .........         65  .........
 AND TRIBUTARIES, NM........
 
          NEW YORK
 
HUDSON RIVER HABITAT                800  .........        800  .........
 RESTORATION, NY............
 
        NORTH DAKOTA
 
SOURIS RIVER, ND............        400  .........        400  .........
 
          OKLAHOMA
 
ARKANSAS RIVER CORRIDOR, OK.        235  .........        235  .........
 
           OREGON
 
COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY 2024        9,500  .........      9,500  .........
 IMPLEMENTATION.............
 
         PUERTO RICO
 
SAN JUAN HARBOR CHANNEL             400  .........        400  .........
 IMPROVEMENT, PR............
 
        RHODE ISLAND
 
RHODE ISLAND COASTLINE, RI..        300  .........        300  .........
 
            TEXAS
 
COASTAL TEXAS PROTECTION AND      2,175  .........      2,175  .........
 RESTORATION STUDY, TX......
GIWW- BRAZOS RIVER                  900  .........        900  .........
 FLOODGATES & COLORADO RIVER
 LOCK, TX...................
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX....      1,500  .........      1,500  .........
JEFFERSON COUNTY SHORE              516  .........        516  .........
 PROTECTION, TX.............
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX..        800  .........        800  .........
RESACAS AT BROWNSVILLE, TX..        251  .........        251  .........
 
          VIRGINIA
 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL               600  .........        600  .........
 WATERWAY BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
 AT NORTH LANDING, VA.......
CITY OF NORFOLK, VA.........        700  .........        700  .........
                             -------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, ITEMS UNDER      32,585  .........     32,585  .........
       STATES...............
                             ===========================================
 
       REMAINING ITEMS
 
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR
 ONGOING WORK:
    FLOOD AND STORM DAMAGE    .........  .........      3,545  .........
     REDUCTION..............
        FLOOD CONTROL.......  .........  .........      2,500  .........
        SHORE PROTECTION....  .........  .........      1,500  .........
    NAVIGATION..............  .........  .........      5,000  .........
        COASTAL AND DEEP-     .........  .........      5,000  .........
         DRAFT..............
        INLAND..............  .........  .........      1,500  .........
    OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT  .........  .........      1,000  .........
     PURPOSES...............
    ENVIRONMENTAL             .........  .........      2,000  .........
     RESTORATION OR
     COMPLIANCE.............
COORDINATION STUDIES WITH
 OTHER AGENCIES:
    ACCESS TO WATER DATA....        360  .........        360  .........
    COMMITTEE ON MARINE              50  .........         50  .........
     TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS.
    OTHER COORDINATION
     PROGRAMS:
        COORDINATION WITH           400  .........        400  .........
         OTHER WATER
         RESOURCE AGENCIES..
        INTERAGENCY AND             400  .........        400  .........
         INTERNATIONAL
         SUPPORT............
        INTERAGENCY WATER           100  .........        100  .........
         RESOURCE
         DEVELOPMENT........
        INVENTORY OF DAMS...        400  .........        400  .........
        SPECIAL                   1,000  .........      1,000  .........
         INVESTIGATIONS.....
        FERC LICENSING......        100  .........        100  .........
        PLANNING ASSISTANCE       5,000  .........      5,000  .........
         TO STATES..........
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF
 BASIC DATA:
    AUTOMATED INFORMATION           250  .........        250  .........
     SYSTEMS SUPPORT TRI-
     CADD...................
    COASTAL FIELD DATA            1,000  .........      1,000  .........
     COLLECTION.............
    ENVIRONMENTAL DATA               80  .........         80  .........
     STUDIES................
    FLOOD DAMAGE DATA.......        230  .........        230  .........
    FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT       15,000  .........     15,000  .........
     SERVICES...............
    HYDROLOGIC STUDIES......        500  .........        500  .........
    INTERNATIONAL WATER             125  .........        125  .........
     STUDIES................
    PRECIPITATION STUDIES...        200  .........        200  .........
    REMOTE SENSING/                  75  .........         75  .........
     GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
     SYSTEM SUPPORT.........
    SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL         50  .........         50  .........
     INFORMATION CENTERS....
    STREAM GAGING...........        550  .........        550  .........
    TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS..      1,000  .........      1,000  .........
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT....     16,145  .........     23,000  .........
OTHER-MISCELLANEOUS:
    DISPOSITION OF COMPLETED      1,000  .........      1,000  .........
     PROJECTS...............
    NATIONAL FLOOD RISK           5,000  .........      5,000  .........
     MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.....
    NATIONAL SHORELINE              400  .........        400  .........
     MANAGEMENT STUDY.......
    PLANNING SUPPORT PROGRAM      3,500  .........      3,500  .........
    TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP              500  .........      1,500  .........
     PROGRAM................
                             -------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, REMAINING        53,415  .........     83,315  .........
       ITEMS................
 
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE........  .........  .........     -2,435  .........
                             -------------------------------------------
      TOTAL.................     86,000  .........    113,465  .........
                             ===========================================
      GRAND TOTAL...........  .........     86,000  .........    113,465
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Arctic Deep Draft Port Study.--The Committee encourages the 
Corps to continue to thoroughly evaluate the proposed deep 
draft port in Nome, taking into account the wide range of 
economic benefits the project would bring to the region, the 
expansion of search and rescue capabilities it would provide, 
and the national security reasons for its construction. The 
Committee supports the creation of an Arctic port network north 
of Dutch Harbor.
    Aquatic Invasive Species Dispersal Barrier.--The Corps is 
encouraged to consider the feasibility of a dispersal barrier 
to mitigate Champlain Canal as a vector for invasive species, 
as authorized in section 5146 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114).
    Central Everglades Planning Project Validation Study.--The 
Committee recognizes the importance of restoring America's 
Everglades, and urges the Corps to expedite the required 
validation report for the Central Everglades Planning Project.
    Disposition of Completed Projects.--The Committee 
recommendation includes funding for Disposition of Completed 
Projects and intends that these funds be used for the studies 
already underway or in the budget request. The Corps shall 
notify the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress before it deviates from this direction. The Committee 
understands the Corps will be making a ``no action'' 
recommendation for the Upper Monongahela and Allegheny River 
studies. No funds provided may be used to take any action on 
the recommendations from the Upper Monongahela and Allegheny 
River studies.
    Economic Impact Studies.--The Committee recognizes there 
are authorized unfunded projects in need of an updated economic 
impact study. In order to properly show the economic benefits 
of such authorized projects, the Committee recommendation 
includes additional funding in this account to update economic 
impact studies where appropriate.
    Planning Assistance to States.--The Committee encourages 
the Corps to prioritize ongoing studies which consist of master 
plan development to address city water, sanitary sewer, and 
stormwater infrastructure needs.
    North Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study.--The Corps is 
encouraged to fund the nine focus areas identified in the North 
Atlantic Coast Comprehensive Study.
    Optimal Dredge Fleet Scheduling.--The Committee applauds 
the research efforts by the Corps' Engineer Research and 
Development Center to support a dredge fleet scheduling 
optimization approach. With limited Federal resources to 
perform the extensive maintenance dredging needs across the 
Nation, it is imperative the Corps considers contracting 
methods that are regional or system-wide. This approach can 
achieve efficiencies that could be realized by sequencing the 
work such that mobilization costs are minimized between jobs 
while also observing the various environmental work windows. 
Along with the Regional Sediment Management Program in the 
Operation and Maintenance account, which utilizes strategies 
that link sediment management actions across multiple 
authorized Corps projects, costs may be significantly reduced 
allowing limited funding to reach more projects in need. Within 
120 days of enactment of this act, the Corps shall brief the 
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on the 
status of ongoing demonstration projects, the development of 
long-term strategies to implement these approaches nationally, 
and any policy or operational challenges associated with 
carrying out such efforts.
    Research and Development.--The Committee recommends 
additional funding for increasing collaboration research 
partnerships to advance the capacity to evaluate methods for 
restoring ecosystem conservation.
    Research and Development, Additional Topic--Urban Flood 
Damage Reduction and Stream Restoration in Arid Regions.--The 
Committee recommendation includes $1,500,000 for the Corps' 
research and development [R&D] program to continue its focus on 
the management of water resources projects that promote public 
safety, reduce risk, improve operational efficiencies, reduce 
flood damage in arid and semi-arid regions, sustain the 
environment, and position our water resource systems to be 
managed as systems and adaptable due to the implications of a 
changing climate. The R&D program should also continue its 
focus on science and technology efforts to address needs for 
resilient water resources infrastructure.
    Salton Sea.--The Committee urges the Corps to expedite 
completion of the feasibility analysis for the Salton Sea 
Restoration Program and to closely coordinate its planning 
efforts with the Natural Resources Conservation Service.
    South Atlantic Coastal Study.--The Committee encourages the 
Corps to conduct, at full Federal expense, a study of the 
coastal areas in the South Atlantic Division to identify the 
risks and vulnerabilities of those areas to increased hurricane 
and storm damage as authorized in section 1204 of the Water 
Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation [WIIN] Act.
    Upper Connecticut River Basin.--The Corps is encouraged to 
work with interested local sponsors to identify wetland and 
ecosystem restoration projects in the Upper Connecticut River 
Basin for the purposes of habitat protection restoration, 
streambank stabilization, fish passage, water quality 
improvement, and restoration of stream stability through 
structural and non-structural work.
    Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway System.--
Unfortunately, the bipartisan support for the Navigation and 
Ecosystem Sustainability Program [NESP], spanning almost a 
decade, has not resulted in NESP's implementation. Last year, 
the Corps provided Congress with a report concluding that an 
updated economic analysis of the project is necessary before it 
can be considered as part of the Civil Works budget. While the 
Committee disagrees with this conclusion, if the Secretary 
determines it is necessary, the Corps is encouraged to fund an 
economic re-evaluation that will provide a benefit cost ratio 
and inform how to move forward with the project. Such a re-
evaluation should include a multi-modal transportation 
evaluation and consideration of the ecological benefits.
    Water Quality and Salinity Impacts on Oyster Reefs.--The 
Committee encourages the Corps, when conducting or reviewing 
environmental assessments or environmental impact statements 
for navigation or coastal restoration projects in areas where 
oyster reefs exist, to consider water quality and salinity 
impacts on those reefs and, when appropriate, to mitigate any 
negative impacts. The Committee also looks forward to the 
Corps' completion of the congressionally required assessment 
and report on the beneficial use of dredged material as 
substrate for oyster reef development.
    Additional Funding for Ongoing Work.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $27,465,000 in additional funds for 
Investigations. From these additional funds, the Corps is 
authorized to begin six new feasibility studies. The Corps is 
directed to allocate these additional funds in accordance with 
the direction in the front matter under the heading 
``Additional Funding''. Of the additional funds provided in 
this account, the Committee encourages the Corps to allocate 
$1,000,000 for the development of a hydraulic model that will 
assist no fewer than five States along a major navigable 
waterway with making regional strategic flood risk management 
decisions at 100 percent Federal cost. Of the additional 
funding recommended in this account for Coastal and Deep Draft 
Navigation, the Corps shall allocate not less than $2,194,000 
for the continuation of ongoing General Reevaluation Reports. 
Additionally, the Corps shall comply with the following 
direction in allocating funds made available for 
Investigations:
  --When evaluating ongoing studies for funding, the Corps 
        shall consider completing or accelerating ongoing 
        studies which will enhance the Nation's economic 
        development, job growth, and international 
        competitiveness; studies located in areas that have 
        suffered recent natural disasters; or studies for areas 
        where revisions to flood frequency flow lines may 
        result in existing infrastructure failing to meet the 
        requirements under the National Flood Insurance 
        Program.
  --The Corps shall include appropriate requests for funding in 
        future budget submissions for PED and new feasibility 
        studies initiated in fiscal year 2018. The Corps shall 
        prepare the budget to reflect study completions, as 
        defined as completion of PED.
  --Funding shall be available for existing studies, including 
        studies in the PED phase, and the updating of economic 
        analyses and cost estimates for studies that have 
        received appropriations for PED that were either not 
        included in the budget request or for which the 
        recommendation in the budget request was inadequate. 
        Ongoing studies that are actively progressing and can 
        utilize the funding in a timely manner are eligible for 
        these additional funds.

                              CONSTRUCTION

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $1,876,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................   1,020,000,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,703,150,000

    The Committee recommends $1,703,150,000 for Construction, 
an increase of $683,150,000 from the budget request. The 
recommendation includes a rescission of $35,000,000 of 
unobligated balances from fiscal year 2011 and prior resulting 
in a net appropriation of $1,668,150,000. The Committee's 
recommendation allows the Corps to select five new construction 
starts to begin in fiscal year 2018.

                              INTRODUCTION

    Funding in this account is used for construction, major 
rehabilitation, and related activities for water resources 
development projects having navigation, flood and storm damage 
reduction, water supply, hydroelectric, environmental 
restoration, and other attendant benefits to the Nation. Funds 
to be derived from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund will be 
applied to cover the Federal share of the Dredged Material 
Disposal Facilities Program.
    The Committee is concerned that the budget request is 
inadequate to meet the needs of projects that depend on funding 
from this account. Consequently, the recommendation includes 
$648,150,000 in additional funding for ongoing work.

                               NEW STARTS

    The Corps is directed to designate new starts in accordance 
with the direction in the front matter under the heading 
``Additional Funding''.

                        COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

    The table below displays the budget request and Committee's 
recommendation for Construction:

                    CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CONSTRUCTION
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Budget         Committee
                  Item                       estimate     recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
               CALIFORNIA
 
AMERICAN RIVER COMMON FEATURES, NATOMAS           20,550          20,550
 BASIN, CA..............................
AMERICAN RIVER WATERSHED (FOLSOM DAM               5,775           5,775
 RAISE), CA.............................
HAMILTON CITY, CA.......................           8,325           8,325
ISABELLA LAKE, CA (DAM SAFETY)..........          58,000          58,000
SACRAMENTO RIVER BANK PROTECTION                   2,780           2,780
 PROJECT, CA............................
SANTA ANA RIVER MAINSTEM, CA............          40,000          40,000
YUBA RIVER BASIN, CA....................          12,400          12,400
 
                 FLORIDA
 
HERBERT HOOVER DIKE, FL (SEEPAGE                  82,000          82,000
 CONTROL)...............................
SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION               76,500          76,500
 (EVERGLADES), FL.......................
 
                 GEORGIA
 
SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION, GA...........          50,060          50,060
 
                ILLINOIS
 
OLMSTED LOCKS AND DAM, OHIO RIVER, IL &          175,000         175,000
 KY.....................................
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION, IL,          33,170          33,170
 IA, MN, MO & WI........................
 
                  IOWA
 
MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE                  30,000          30,000
 RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD..
 
                KENTUCKY
 
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY....................          25,000          25,000
 
                MARYLAND
 
POPLAR ISLAND, MD.......................          36,250          36,250
 
              MASSACHUSETTS
 
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENTS,            58,000          58,000
 MA.....................................
 
               NEW JERSEY
 
RARITAN RIVER BASIN, GREEN BROOK SUB-             20,000          20,000
 BASIN, NJ..............................
 
                 OREGON
 
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA....          22,000          22,000
 
              PENNSYLVANIA
 
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA......          50,100          50,100
 
                TENNESSEE
 
CENTER HILL LAKE, TN....................          28,930          28,930
 
                  TEXAS
 
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.......          16,500          16,500
 
               WASHINGTON
 
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR &          70,000          70,000
 ID (CRFM)..............................
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA....................          33,600          33,600
 
              WEST VIRGINIA
 
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV......................           4,425           4,425
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, ITEMS UNDER STATES......         959,365         959,365
                                         ===============================
             REMAINING ITEMS
ADDITIONAL FUNDING:
    FLOOD AND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION....  ..............         150,000
        FLOOD CONTROL...................  ..............         125,000
        SHORE PROTECTION................  ..............          50,000
    NAVIGATION..........................  ..............         211,200
    INLAND WATERWAYS TRUST FUND REVENUES  ..............         111,750
    OTHER AUTHORIZED PROJECT PURPOSES...  ..............          10,000
        ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION OR      ..............          40,000
         COMPLIANCE.....................
        ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE....  ..............          60,000
AQUATIC PLANT CONTROL PROGRAM...........  ..............          11,000
CONTINUING AUTHORITIES PROGRAM:
    AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION                  6,500           9,000
     (SECTION 206)......................
    BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL              500           1,000
     (SECTION 204)......................
    EMERGENCY STREAMBANK AND SHORELINE    ..............           5,000
     PROTECTION (SECTION 14)............
    FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS (SECTION 205)           1,000           1,000
    MITIGATION OF SHORE DAMAGES (SECTION  ..............             500
     111)...............................
    NAVIGATION PROGRAM (SECTION 107)....  ..............           7,200
    PROJECT MODIFICATIONS FOR                      1,000           3,000
     IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
     (SECTION 1135).....................
    SHORE PROTECTION (SECTION 103)......  ..............             500
DAM SAFETY AND SEEPAGE/STABILITY                  34,300          34,300
 CORRECTION PROGRAM.....................
EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION..................          17,000          17,000
INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--BOARD                   60              60
 EXPENSE................................
INLAND WATERWAYS USERS BOARD--CORPS                  275             275
 EXPENSE................................
RESTORATION OF ABANDONED MINES..........  ..............           2,000
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL..........................          60,635         849,785
 
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE....................  ..............        -106,000
RESCISSION..............................  ..............         -35,000
                                         -------------------------------
      TOTAL.............................       1,020,000       1,668,150
 
          APPROPRIATIONS................       1,020,000       1,703,150
          RESCISSIONS...................  ..............         -35,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Advanced Project Partnership Agreements.--The Committee 
notes the importance of partnerships with local sponsors who 
advance money beyond their non-Federal share in an effort to 
reduce the overall cost of construction for deep-draft 
navigation projects. Keeping projects on schedule to meet 
increasing demands for larger ships calling U.S. ports is 
critical. Therefore, the Committee directs the Corps to allow 
local sponsors who have signed Advanced Project Partnership 
Agreements to receive construction funds in Work Plans 
submitted by the Corps to Congress.
    Alternative Financing.--The Committee directs the Assistant 
Secretary of the Army (Civil Works) to report, within 180 days 
of the date of enactment of this act, on how to calculate the 
total return on Federal investment for projects that use 
alternative financing such as public-private partnerships. The 
report shall identify the viability of using total return on 
Federal investment as a metric for analyzing projects with 
alternative financing.
    Aquatic Plant Control Program.--Of the funding recommended 
for the Aquatic Plant Control Program, $5,000,000 shall be for 
nationwide research and development to address invasive aquatic 
plants. The Committee encourages the Corps to support cost-
shared aquatic plant management programs. The funding 
recommendation includes $6,000,000 for watercraft inspection 
stations, early detection monitoring, and rapid response as 
authorized by section 1178(b) of the WIIN Act. Within this 
amount, the Corps is also directed to undertake control of the 
flowering rush.
    Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal Dispersal Barrier, 
Illinois.--The issue of hydrologic separation should be fully 
studied by the Corps and vetted by the appropriate 
congressional authorizing committees and specifically enacted 
into law. No funds provided in this act may be used for 
construction of hydrologic separation measures.
    Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan [CERP]--Indian 
River Lagoon-South.--The Committee recognizes the importance of 
restoring America's Everglades, and eliminating discharges from 
Lake Okeechobee that help fuel harmful algal blooms in the St. 
Lucie River and Indian River Lagoon. The Committee urges the 
Corps to expedite preparations for design work on the C-23 and 
C-24 South Reservoirs that, along with the C-44 Reservoir, will 
serve as crucial elements of the Indian River Lagoon-South CERP 
project to collect and clean discharges before they enter the 
Lagoon.
    Continuing Authorities Program.--The Committee recommends 
$27,200,000 for the Continuing Authorities Program [CAP], an 
increase of $18,200,000 from the budget request. CAP is a 
useful tool for the Corps to undertake small localized projects 
without being encumbered by the lengthy study and authorization 
phases typical of most Corps projects. The standing CAP 
authorities are: flood control (section 205), emergency 
streambank and shoreline protection (section 14), beach erosion 
control (section 103), mitigation of shore damages (section 
111), navigation projects (section 107), snagging and clearing 
(section 208), aquatic ecosystem restoration (section 206), 
beneficial uses of dredged material (section 204), and project 
modifications for improvement of the environment (section 
1135). The Committee recommends funding eight of the nine 
sections rather than only the four sections proposed in the 
budget request. The Committee does not recommend funding for 
section 208, as these projects can be accommodated under the 
authority of section 205. Within the CAP and to the extent 
already authorized by law, the Corps is encouraged to consider 
projects that enhance coastal and ocean ecosystem resiliency. 
The management of CAP should continue consistent with direction 
provided in previous fiscal years.
    The Committee urges the administration to execute CAP as 
laid out by the Committee and include sufficient funding for 
this program in future budget requests. The Corps shall 
continue the ongoing processes for initiating, suspending, and 
terminating projects. Suspended projects shall not be 
reactivated or funded unless the sponsor reaffirms in writing 
its support for the project and establishes its willingness and 
capability to execute its project responsibilities. The Corps 
shall provide an annual report within 60 days of the end of 
each fiscal year detailing the progress made on the backlog of 
projects. The report shall include the completions and 
terminations as well as progress of ongoing work.
    Dalles Dam.--The Committee is aware of the Corps' legal 
analysis, which finds that a new tribal village can be 
constructed pursuant to section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950, which authorized construction of The Dalles Dam. A 
January 3, 2017 memorandum directed the Corps to create a 
Village Development Plan which would be eligible for 
construction funding upon completion. The Corps is encouraged 
to complete the Village Development Plan in consultation with 
affected Columbia River tribes and the Bureau of Indian 
Affairs. The Committee further urges the Corps to issue 
implementation guidance for section 1178(c) of the WIIN Act.
    Enhanced Options for Sand Acquisition for Beach 
Renourishment Projects.--The Committee urges the Corps to 
provide states with guidance and recommendations to implement 
cost effective measures and planning for sand management.
    Environmental Infrastructure.--The Committee recommends an 
additional $60,000,000 in the Construction account for 
environmental infrastructure. The Corps is encouraged to give 
priority to projects in rural areas, projects with greater 
economic impact, projects in counties or parishes with high 
poverty rates, projects owed past reimbursements, and projects 
that will provide substantial benefits to water quality 
improvement. The Committee encourages the Corps to evaluate 
projects under section 592 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1999 and section 5113 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 2007 and allocate resources made available by Congress 
to meet the needs and projects identified under those sections.
    Levee Safety Program.--The Committee is concerned that the 
Corps has not taken steps to implement the levee safety 
initiatives required under WRRDA 2014. The Committee directs 
the Corps, after consulting with the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency, to develop a plan of action within 90 days 
of the date of enactment of this act that includes tangible 
milestones for how the Corps will meet the requirements under 
Public Law 113-121, section 3016.
    McCook and Thornton Reservoirs, Illinois.--The Committee is 
again disappointed by the Corps' failure to provide funding for 
McCook Reservoir in the budget and deeply concerned by the 
Corps' decision to reject congressional intent and its own 
history on this project. Congressional intent has been clear 
since its authorization in 1988, and in subsequent 
modification. Congress recently reiterated its support for the 
project when it ordered the Corps to expedite the project's 
completion in the WIIN Act. The project is 91 percent complete, 
and the Committee strongly urges the Corps to complete the 
project. The McCook Reservoir was authorized for flood risk 
management and constructed to help alleviate flooding problems 
in the Metropolitan area of Chicago, Illinois.
    Metro East Saint Louis, Illinois.--The Committee is 
disappointed by the lack of funding provided to the Metro East 
levee system. This levee rehabilitation project will help 
protect communities in the Metro East region from rising waters 
on the Mississippi River. The Committee urges the Corps to 
include funding for the Metro East levee system in the Corps' 
Fiscal Year 2018 Work Plan.
    Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island.--The Committee understands that 
the Corps must complete and approve its Baltimore Harbor and 
Channels Dredged Material Management Plan Update prior to 
budgeting for the Mid-Chesapeake Bay Island Project (James and 
Barren Islands). When the Dredged Material Management Plan is 
approved, the Committee encourages the Corps to provide funding 
for PED for this project through the annual budget process or 
from undesignated funds.
    Monitoring and Adaptive Management.--The Committee commends 
the Corps for completion of and progress on a number of large 
scale ecosystem restoration projects, which have produced 
significant wetland and habitat restoration, beneficial reuse 
of dredged material, and additional public access. Many of 
these restoration projects provide multiple benefits to 
wildlife and surrounding communities, yet are not adequately 
studied for quantifiable benefits. Additionally, where the 
Corps performs mitigation measures, success rates are not 
adequately monitored to ensure replication and use of best 
practices. The Committee encourages the Corps to expand 
monitoring and adaptive management efforts in order to better 
measure the return on investment of large scale ecosystem 
restoration projects and mitigation project performance.
    Mud Mountain Dam.--The Committee commends the Corps for 
initiating construction to support the October 2014 Mud 
Mountain Biological Opinion (BiOp) and mitigate the impact of 
the ongoing operation of Mud Mountain Dam on species listed 
under the Endangered Species Act [ESA] by replacing the barrier 
structure and building a new fish passage facility. The 
Committee encourages the Corps to uphold the agency's ESA and 
tribal treaty responsibilities by requesting sufficient funding 
in future budgets to implement the BiOp requirements and 
complete construction by 2020.
    Murrieta Creek California.--The Committee is aware that the 
Corps has been working on a Limited Reevaluation Report [LRR] 
to detail a re-scoped project for a more cost-effective 
solution while it proceeds with construction. The Committee 
urges the Corps to complete and approve the LRR and move into 
the next phase of construction.
    Oyster Restoration.--The Committee supports the Chesapeake 
Bay Oyster Restoration Project and encourages the Corps to 
provide sufficient funding in future budget submissions or the 
fiscal year 2018 work plan.
    Prioritization of the Corps Projects in Drought Stricken 
Areas.--The Committee urges the Corps to prioritize any 
authorized projects that would alleviate water supply issues in 
areas that have been afflicted by severe droughts in the last 3 
fiscal years, to include projects focused on the treatment of 
brackish water.
    Puget Sound.--The Committee encourages the Corps to proceed 
with the tiered implementation strategy using all existing 
authorities as outlined in the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem 
Restoration Project Feasibility Study, Completion Strategy 
Guidance dated June 2015. The Corps is directed to recognize 
the Puget Sound Nearshore Study as the feasibility component 
for the purposes of section 544 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000. The Committee notes the WIIN Act 
authorized construction of the Puget Sound Nearshore Ecosystem 
Restoration Project, and the Committee encourages the Corps to 
initiate PED.
    South San Francisco Bay Shoreline.--The Committee was 
deeply disappointed by the lack of a new construction start in 
the fiscal year 2018 budget for the first phase of the South 
San Francisco Bay Shoreline Project or funding for the 
feasibility study for the next phase of the project. This 
project provides critical flood protection to communities, 
businesses, and municipal structures in Santa Clara County, 
California. In addition, this project will restore 
approximately 2,900 acres of former salt production ponds to 
tidal marsh habitat and improve recreational access to 
surrounding communities. The Committee strongly urges the Corps 
to prioritize progress on this project.
    South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Comprehensive Federal-
State Cost-Share Transparency.--The Committee recognizes the 
importance of the 50/50 partnership between the State of 
Florida and the Federal Government in efforts to restore 
America's Everglades. Key to this partnership is an accurate 
and transparent accounting of all spending for all South 
Florida Ecosystem Restoration [SFER] projects, including CERP 
projects, associated with the Federal-State cost-share. The 
Committee directs the Corps to make publicly available a 
comprehensive snapshot of all SFER cost-share accounting down 
to the project level for fiscal year 2018 by September 30, 
2018.
    Additional Funding for Ongoing Work.--The Committee 
recommendation includes $648,150,000 in additional funds for 
Construction above the budget request. The Corps shall allocate 
these additional funds in accordance with the direction in the 
front matter under the heading ``Additional Funding''. Of the 
additional funds provided in this account for flood and storm 
damage reduction, flood control, and environmental restoration 
or compliance, the Corps shall allocate not less than 
$15,400,000 for hurricane and storm damage risk reduction and 
environmental restoration projects as authorized in section 
7002 of Public Law 113-121 with both structural and 
nonstructural project elements. Of the additional funds 
recommended in this account for flood and storm damage 
reduction and flood control, the Corps shall allocate not less 
than $20,000,000 to continue construction of projects which 
principally include improvements to rainfall drainage systems 
that address flood damages. Of the additional funds recommended 
in this account for flood and storm damage reduction, 
navigation, and other authorized project purposes (excluding 
environmental infrastructure), the Corps shall allocate not 
less than $15,000,000 to authorized reimbursements for projects 
with executed project partnership agreements and that have 
completed construction or where non-Federal sponsors intend to 
use the funds for additional water resource development 
activities. Of the additional funds recommended in this account 
for CAP Flood Control Projects (section 205), the Corps is 
encouraged to give priority to projects that have been impacted 
by flood events in 2017, which resulted in legal action against 
the local sponsor. Of the additional funds recommended in this 
account for CAP Emergency Streambank and Shoreline Protection 
(section 14), the Corps shall allocate not less than $600,000 
to complete ongoing feasibility studies and initiate 
construction on projects that address erosion problems 
jeopardizing box culvert crossings on public roadways. 
Additionally, the Corps shall comply with the following 
direction in allocating funds recommended for Construction:
  --For Flood Risk Management and Flood Control projects, the 
        Corps is strongly urged to prioritize funding for dam 
        safety projects where progression toward failure is 
        confirmed to be taking place under normal operations, 
        and the dam is almost certain to fail under normal 
        operations within a few years without intervention.
  --Additional considerations include whether the project is 
        positioned to permit award of funding for significant 
        items of construction, achieve necessary milestones, or 
        otherwise realize notable construction progress in 
        fiscal year 2018; and the project sponsor expended 
        funds under an existing project partnership agreement 
        for creditable work, including acquisition of rights-
        of-way.
  --None of these funds shall be used for CAP projects.
  --Funding may be for all categories including periodic beach 
        renourishments and reimbursements.
  --Funding may be made available to projects for which the 
        sponsor is awaiting reimbursement from the Federal 
        Government to continue with construction of remaining 
        authorized project features.

                   MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $362,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     253,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     375,000,000

    The Committee recommends $375,000,000 for Mississippi River 
and Tributaries, an increase of $122,000,000 over the budget 
request. Funds recommended in this account are for planning, 
construction, and operations and maintenance activities 
associated with water resource projects located in the lower 
Mississippi River Valley from Cape Girardeau, Missouri to the 
Gulf of Mexico.
    The table below displays the budget request and Committee's 
recommendation:

                    MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Budget         Committee
                  Item                       estimate     recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              CONSTRUCTION
 
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, REVETMENTS, AR, IL,          65,501          65,501
 KY, LA, MS, MO & TN....................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY,             25,750          25,750
 LA, MS, MO &TN.........................
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, DIKES, AR, IL, KY,           14,610          14,610
 LA, MS, MO &TN.........................
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................           1,500           1,500
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA...             650             650
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION............         108,011         108,011
                                         ===============================
        OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
 
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, REVETMENTS, AR, IL,          41,371          41,371
 KY, LA, MS, MO & TN....................
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, DREDGING, AR, IL,            14,923          14,923
 KY, LA, MS, MO & TN....................
CHANNEL IMPROVEMENT, DIKES, AR, IL, KY,            2,600           2,600
 LA, MS, MO & TN........................
MISSISSIPPI RIVER LEVEES, AR, IL, KY,              9,917           9,917
 LA, MS, MO &TN.........................
HELENA HARBOR, PHILLIPS COUNTY, AR......             915             915
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......             421             421
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, NORTH BANK, AR....             235             235
LOWER ARKANSAS RIVER, SOUTH BANK, AR....             158             158
ST FRANCIS BASIN, AR & MO...............           5,900           5,900
TENSAS BASIN, BOEUF AND TENSAS RIVERS,             1,987           1,987
 AR & LA................................
WHITE RIVER BACKWATER, AR...............             900             900
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......              27              27
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......              20              20
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LA...................          13,639          13,639
ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LA...           1,807           1,807
BATON ROUGE HARBOR, DEVIL SWAMP, LA.....             543             543
BAYOU COCODRIE AND TRIBUTARIES, LA......              36              36
BONNET CARRE, LA........................           1,960           1,960
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......             725             725
LOWER RED RIVER, SOUTH BANK LEVEES, LA..             398             398
MISSISSIPPI DELTA REGION, LA............             381             381
OLD RIVER, LA...........................           6,384           6,384
TENSAS BASIN, RED RIVER BACKWATER, LA...           2,608           2,608
GREENVILLE HARBOR, MS...................           1,000           1,000
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......             180             180
VICKSBURG HARBOR, MS....................             750             750
YAZOO BASIN, ARKABUTLA LAKE, MS.........           5,610           5,610
YAZOO BASIN, BIG SUNFLOWER RIVER, MS....             135             135
YAZOO BASIN, ENID LAKE, MS..............           5,145           5,145
YAZOO BASIN, GREENWOOD, MS..............             644             644
YAZOO BASIN, GRENADA LAKE, MS...........           4,794           4,794
YAZOO BASIN, MAIN STEM, MS..............             943             943
YAZOO BASIN, SARDIS LAKE, MS............           5,901           5,901
YAZOO BASIN, TRIBUTARIES, MS............             773             773
YAZOO BASIN, WILL M WHITTINGTON AUX                  307             307
 CHAN, MS...............................
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO BACKWATER AREA, MS...             369             369
YAZOO BASIN, YAZOO CITY, MS.............             584             584
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......             165             165
WAPPAPELLO LAKE, MO.....................           4,206           4,206
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......              33              33
MEMPHIS HARBOR, MCKELLAR LAKE, TN.......           1,666           1,666
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, OPERATION AND                    141,060         141,060
       MAINTENANCE......................
                                         ===============================
             REMAINING ITEMS
 
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK       ..............           5,000
 DREDGING...............................
    FLOOD CONTROL.......................  ..............          67,000
    OTHER AUTHORIZED PURPOSES...........  ..............          50,000
COLLECTION AND STUDY OF BASIC DATA......           2,700           2,700
MAPPING.................................           1,139           1,139
MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION............              90              90
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS.........           3,929         125,929
                                         ===============================
REDUCTION FOR SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE......  ..............  ..............
                                         -------------------------------
      TOTAL, MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND               253,000         375,000
       TRIBUTARIES......................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional Funding for Ongoing Work.--When allocating the 
additional funding recommended in this account, the Corps shall 
consider giving priority to completing or accelerating ongoing 
work that will enhance the Nation's economic development, job 
growth, and international competitiveness, or to studies or 
projects located in areas that have suffered recent natural 
disasters. While this funding is shown under remaining items, 
the Corps shall use these funds in investigations, 
construction, and operation and maintenance, as applicable. 
When allocating the additional funding recommended in this 
account, the Corps shall allocate not less than $30,000,000 for 
additional flood control construction projects outside of the 
Lower Mississippi River Main Stem. Of the additional funds 
recommended in this account for other authorized project 
purposes, the Corps shall allocate not less than $2,000,000 for 
operation and maintenance of facilities that are educational or 
to continue land management of mitigation features. Of the 
additional funds recommended in this account, the Corps shall 
allocate not less than $5,000,000 for dredging of ports and 
harbors. Of the additional funds recommended in this account 
for flood control and other authorized project purposes, the 
Corps shall allocate not less than $300,000 to initiate a 
feasibility study to evaluate the need for improvements for 
flood control, ecosystem restoration, water quality and related 
purposes associated with storm water runoff and management.

                       OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $3,149,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................   3,100,000,000
Committee recommendation................................   3,481,475,000

    The Committee recommends $3,481,475,000 for Operation and 
Maintenance, an increase of $381,475,000 over the budget 
request.

                              INTRODUCTION

    Funding in this account is used to fund operations, 
maintenance, and related activities at water resource projects 
that the Corps operates and maintains. These activities include 
dredging, repair, and operation of structures and other 
facilities, as authorized in the various river and harbor, 
flood control, and water resources development acts. Related 
activities include aquatic plant control, monitoring of 
completed projects where appropriate, removal of sunken 
vessels, and the collection of domestic waterborne commerce 
statistics.

                        COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

    The table below displays the budget request and Committee's 
recommendation for Operation and Maintenance.

              CORPS OF ENGINEERS--OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Budget         Committee
                  Item                       estimate     recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 ALABAMA
 
ALABAMA RIVER LAKES, AL.................          15,392          15,392
BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, AL..          27,217          27,217
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, AL..........           6,534           6,534
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AL.......             210             210
MOBILE HARBOR, AL.......................          24,450          24,450
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AL...........             149             149
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AL.....              83              83
TENNESSEE--TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE             1,751           1,751
 MITIGATION, AL & MS....................
TENNESSEE--TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY, AL & MS..          29,499          29,499
WALTER F GEORGE LOCK AND DAM, AL & GA...           9,653           9,653
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, AL...              80              80
 
                 ALASKA
 
ANCHORAGE HARBOR, AK....................          10,260          10,260
CHENA RIVER LAKES, AK...................           8,038           8,038
CHIGNIK HARBOR, AK......................             150             150
DILLINGHAM HARBOR, AK...................             850             850
DOUGLAS HARBOR, AK......................             300             300
HOMER HARBOR, AK........................             600             600
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AK.......             200             200
NINILCHIK HARBOR, AK....................             550             550
NOME HARBOR, AK.........................           2,365           2,365
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AK...........             750             750
 
                 ARIZONA
 
ALAMO LAKE, AZ..........................           2,027           2,027
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AZ.......              85              85
PAINTED ROCK DAM, AZ....................           1,139           1,139
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, AZ.....             102             102
WHITLOW RANCH DAM, AZ...................             784             784
 
                ARKANSAS
 
BEAVER LAKE, AR.........................           8,907           8,907
BLAKELY MT DAM, LAKE OUACHITA, AR.......           7,803           7,803
BLUE MOUNTAIN LAKE, AR..................           1,883           1,883
BULL SHOALS LAKE, AR....................          11,427          11,427
DEGRAY LAKE, AR.........................           7,060           7,060
DEQUEEN LAKE, AR........................           1,708           1,708
DIERKS LAKE, AR.........................           1,778           1,778
GILLHAM LAKE, AR........................           1,527           1,527
GREERS FERRY LAKE, AR...................           8,016           8,016
HELENA HARBOR, AR.......................              15              15
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, AR.......             458             458
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION          47,467          47,467
 SYSTEM, AR.............................
MILLWOOD LAKE, AR.......................           7,362           7,362
NARROWS DAM, LAKE GREESON, AR...........           5,908           5,908
NIMROD LAKE, AR.........................           2,068           2,068
NORFORK LAKE, AR........................           9,549           9,549
OSCEOLA HARBOR, AR......................             515             515
OUACHITA AND BLACK RIVERS, AR & LA......          10,548          10,548
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, AR...........               1               1
WHITE RIVER, AR.........................              25              25
YELLOW BEND PORT, AR....................             115             115
 
               CALIFORNIA
 
BLACK BUTTE LAKE, CA....................           2,905           2,905
BUCHANAN DAM, HV EASTMAN LAKE, CA.......           2,318           2,318
CHANNEL ISLANDS HARBOR, CA..............           6,400           6,400
COYOTE VALLEY DAM, LAKE MENDOCINO, CA...           3,841           3,841
DRY CREEK (WARM SPRINGS) LAKE AND                  6,470           6,470
 CHANNEL, CA............................
FARMINGTON DAM, CA......................             617             617
HIDDEN DAM, HENSLEY LAKE, CA............           2,518           2,518
HUMBOLDT HARBOR AND BAY, CA.............           5,500           5,500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CA.......           3,962           3,962
ISABELLA LAKE, CA.......................           3,538           3,538
LOS ANGELES- LONG BEACH HARBORS, CA.....           4,470           4,470
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DRAINAGE AREA, CA....          17,982          17,982
MERCED COUNTY STREAMS, CA...............             810             810
MOJAVE RIVER DAM, CA....................           1,305           1,305
MORRO BAY HARBOR, CA....................           2,200           2,200
NEW HOGAN LAKE, CA......................           3,262           3,262
NEW MELONES LAKE, DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL, CA           2,517           2,517
OAKLAND HARBOR (50 FOOT PROJECT), CA....          17,993          17,993
OCEANSIDE HARBOR, CA....................           2,350           2,350
PINE FLAT LAKE, CA......................          10,075          10,075
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CA...........           1,433           1,433
RICHMOND HARBOR, CA.....................          10,800          10,800
SACRAMENTO RIVER (30 FOOT PROJECT), CA..           1,200           1,200
SACRAMENTO RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES (DEBRIS           1,725           1,725
 CONTROL), CA...........................
SACRAMENTO RIVER SHALLOW DRAFT CHANNEL,              175             175
 CA.....................................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY DELTA MODEL STRUCTURE,           1,565           1,565
 CA.....................................
SAN FRANCISCO BAY LONG TERM MANAGEMENT               600             600
 STRATEGY, CA...........................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR AND BAY, CA (DRIFT            3,500           3,500
 REMOVAL)...............................
SAN FRANCISCO HARBOR, CA................           3,700           3,700
SAN JOAQUIN RIVER, PORT OF STOCKTON, CA.           3,225           3,225
SAN PABLO BAY AND MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CA           5,075           5,075
SANTA ANA RIVER BASIN, CA...............           5,579           5,579
SANTA BARBARA HARBOR, CA................           3,080           3,080
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CA.....           1,391           1,391
SUCCESS LAKE, CA........................           3,454           3,454
SUISUN BAY CHANNEL, CA..................           7,800           7,800
TERMINUS DAM, LAKE KAWEAH, CA (DAM                 5,950           5,950
 SAFETY)................................
VENTURA HARBOR, CA......................           5,163           5,163
YUBA RIVER, CA..........................           1,519           1,519
 
                COLORADO
 
BEAR CREEK LAKE, CO.....................             476             476
CHATFIELD LAKE, CO......................           2,105           2,105
CHERRY CREEK LAKE, CO...................           1,155           1,155
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CO.......             352             352
JOHN MARTIN RESERVOIR, CO...............           9,216           9,216
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, CO.....             646             646
TRINIDAD LAKE, CO.......................           5,155           5,155
 
               CONNECTICUT
 
BLACK ROCK LAKE, CT.....................             815             815
COLEBROOK RIVER LAKE, CT................           1,237           1,237
GREENWICH HARBOR, CT....................             300             300
HANCOCK BROOK LAKE, CT..................             731             731
HOP BROOK LAKE, CT......................           1,562           1,562
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 10              10
 PROJECTS, CT...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, CT.......             461             461
MANSFIELD HOLLOW LAKE, CT...............           1,461           1,461
NORTHFIELD BROOK LAKE, CT...............             730             730
PATCHOGUE RIVER, CT.....................             400             400
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, CT...........             850             850
STAMFORD HURRICANE BARRIER, CT..........             784             784
THOMASTON DAM, CT.......................           1,892           1,892
WEST THOMPSON LAKE, CT..................           1,033           1,033
 
                DELAWARE
 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DE.......              65              65
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, DELAWARE RIVER TO          15,585          15,585
 CHESAPEAKE BAY, DE & MD................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DE...........             200             200
WILMINGTON HARBOR, DE...................           8,085           8,085
 
          DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, DC.......              76              76
POTOMAC AND ANACOSTIA RIVERS, DC (DRIFT              875             875
 REMOVAL)...............................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, DC...........              25              25
WASHINGTON HARBOR, DC...................              25              25
 
                 FLORIDA
 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (AIWW),             2,224           2,224
 FL.....................................
CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER TO ANCLOTE, FL.....              52              52
CANAVERAL HARBOR, FL....................           1,470           1,470
CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA, FL........          24,858          24,858
ESCAMBIA AND CONECUH RIVERS, FL & AL....              55              55
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, FL.......             958             958
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, CALOOSAHATCHEE R               50              50
 TO ANCLOTE R, FL.......................
INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, JACKSONVILLE TO             3,560           3,560
 MIAMI, FL..............................
JACKSONVILLE HARBOR, FL.................           7,690           7,690
JIM WOODRUFF LOCK AND DAM, LAKE                    6,874           6,874
 SEMINOLE, FL, AL & GA..................
MANATEE HARBOR, FL......................             900             900
MIAMI HARBOR, FL........................             100             100
OKEECHOBEE WATERWAY, FL.................           2,692           2,692
PALM BEACH HARBOR, FL...................           4,000           4,000
PANAMA CITY HARBOR, FL..................           1,890           1,890
PENSACOLA HARBOR, FL....................              34              34
PORT EVERGLADES HARBOR, FL..............             420             420
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, FL...........           1,375           1,375
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, FL...........           3,259           3,259
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, FL.....              99              99
TAMPA HARBOR, FL........................           8,290           8,290
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, FL...             170             170
 
                 GEORGIA
 
ALLATOONA LAKE, GA......................          10,463          10,463
APALACHICOLA, CHATTAHOOCHEE AND FLINT              1,845           1,845
 RIVERS, GA, AL & FL....................
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, GA......             181             181
BRUNSWICK HARBOR, GA....................           4,528           4,528
BUFORD DAM AND LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GA...          11,164          11,164
CARTERS DAM AND LAKE, GA................           8,587           8,587
HARTWELL LAKE, GA & SC..................          12,752          12,752
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 15              15
 PROJECTS, GA...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, GA.......             277             277
J STROM THURMOND LAKE, GA & SC..........          12,001          12,001
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, GA...........             100             100
RICHARD B RUSSELL DAM AND LAKE, GA & SC.           9,003           9,003
SAVANNAH HARBOR, GA.....................          33,436          33,436
SAVANNAH RIVER BELOW AUGUSTA, GA........             137             137
WEST POINT DAM AND LAKE, GA & AL........          12,147          12,147
 
                 HAWAII
 
BARBERS POINT HARBOR, HI................             269             269
HILO HARBOR, HI.........................             551             551
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, HI.......             698             698
NAWILIWILI HARBOR, HI...................           4,815           4,815
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, HI...........             752             752
 
                  IDAHO
 
ALBENI FALLS DAM, ID....................           1,459           1,459
DWORSHAK DAM AND RESERVOIR, ID..........           4,795           4,795
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ID.......             337             337
LUCKY PEAK LAKE, ID.....................           3,698           3,698
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ID.....             627             627
 
                ILLINOIS
 
CALUMET HARBOR AND RIVER, IL & IN.......           3,808           3,808
CARLYLE LAKE, IL........................           6,748           6,748
CHICAGO HARBOR, IL......................           3,020           3,020
CHICAGO RIVER, IL.......................             593             593
CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL                   16,700          16,700
 DISPERSAL BARRIER, IL..................
FARM CREEK RESERVOIRS, IL...............             529             529
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVR PORTION), IL & IN          48,384          48,384
ILLINOIS WATERWAY (MVS PORTION), IL & IN           1,958           1,958
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 55              55
 PROJECTS, IL...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IL.......           1,654           1,654
KASKASKIA RIVER NAVIGATION, IL..........           4,889           4,889
LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, IL.............           1,100           1,100
LAKE SHELBYVILLE, IL....................           8,835           8,835
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER          93,953          93,953
 AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVR PORTION), IL......
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER          43,900          43,900
 AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVS PORTION), IL......
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IL...........             104             104
REND LAKE, IL...........................           7,593           7,593
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    738             738
 WATERS, IL.............................
WAUKEGAN HARBOR, IL.....................           2,000           2,000
 
                 INDIANA
 
BROOKVILLE LAKE, IN.....................           1,216           1,216
BURNS WATERWAY HARBOR, IN...............           3,649           3,649
CAGLES MILL LAKE, IN....................           1,089           1,089
CECIL M HARDEN LAKE, IN.................           1,047           1,047
INDIANA HARBOR, IN......................          11,564          11,564
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IN.......           1,187           1,187
J EDWARD ROUSH LAKE, IN.................           1,084           1,084
MISSISSINEWA LAKE, IN...................           1,110           1,110
MONROE LAKE, IN.........................           1,144           1,144
PATOKA LAKE, IN.........................           1,153           1,153
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, IN...........             185             185
SALAMONIE LAKE, IN......................           1,091           1,091
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    149             149
 WATERS, IN.............................
 
                  IOWA
 
CORALVILLE LAKE, IA.....................           9,915           9,915
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                  6               6
 PROJECTS, IA...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, IA.......             868             868
MISSOURI RIVER--SIOUX CITY TO THE MOUTH,           8,964           8,964
 IA, KS, MO & NE........................
MISSOURI RIVER FISH AND WILDLIFE                   2,547           2,547
 RECOVERY, IA, KS, MO, MT, NE, ND & SD..
RATHBUN LAKE, IA........................           2,788           2,788
RED ROCK DAM AND LAKE RED ROCK, IA......           7,095           7,095
SAYLORVILLE LAKE, IA....................          19,223          19,223
 
                 KANSAS
 
CLINTON LAKE, KS........................           3,662           3,662
COUNCIL GROVE LAKE, KS..................           1,743           1,743
EL DORADO LAKE, KS......................             981             981
ELK CITY LAKE, KS.......................           1,547           1,547
FALL RIVER LAKE, KS.....................           1,619           1,619
HILLSDALE LAKE, KS......................           1,076           1,076
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 11              11
 PROJECTS, KS...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KS.......           1,218           1,218
JOHN REDMOND DAM AND RESERVOIR, KS......           1,890           1,890
KANOPOLIS LAKE, KS......................           3,185           3,185
MARION LAKE, KS.........................           2,251           2,251
MELVERN LAKE, KS........................           2,714           2,714
MILFORD LAKE, KS........................           2,367           2,367
PEARSON--SKUBITZ BIG HILL LAKE, KS......           3,799           3,799
PERRY LAKE, KS..........................           3,227           3,227
POMONA LAKE, KS.........................           2,871           2,871
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, KS.....             369             369
TORONTO LAKE, KS........................             926             926
TUTTLE CREEK LAKE, KS...................           3,975           3,975
WILSON LAKE, KS.........................           1,766           1,766
 
                KENTUCKY
 
BARKLEY DAM AND LAKE BARKLEY, KY & TN...          12,247          12,247
BARREN RIVER LAKE, KY...................           3,233           3,233
BIG SANDY HARBOR, KY....................           1,865           1,865
BUCKHORN LAKE, KY.......................           1,820           1,820
CARR CREEK LAKE, KY.....................           1,850           1,850
CAVE RUN LAKE, KY.......................             962             962
DEWEY LAKE, KY..........................           1,920           1,920
ELVIS STAHR (HICKMAN) HARBOR, KY........             915             915
FALLS OF THE OHIO NATIONAL WILDLIFE, KY               43              43
 & IN...................................
FISHTRAP LAKE, KY.......................           2,190           2,190
GRAYSON LAKE, KY........................           1,972           1,972
GREEN AND BARREN RIVERS, KY.............           3,420           3,420
GREEN RIVER LAKE, KY....................           2,917           2,917
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, KY.......           1,271           1,271
KENTUCKY RIVER, KY......................              10              10
LAUREL RIVER LAKE, KY...................           2,698           2,698
MARTINS FORK LAKE, KY...................           1,496           1,496
MIDDLESBORO CUMBERLAND RIVER BASIN, KY..             264             264
NOLIN LAKE, KY..........................           2,880           2,880
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, KY, IL, IN &           47,331          47,331
 OH.....................................
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, KY, IL,              5,800           5,800
 IN, OH, PA & WV........................
PAINTSVILLE LAKE, KY....................           1,382           1,382
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, KY...........               1               1
ROUGH RIVER LAKE, KY....................           4,300           4,300
TAYLORSVILLE LAKE, KY...................           1,099           1,099
WOLF CREEK DAM, LAKE CUMBERLAND, KY.....          11,613          11,613
YATESVILLE LAKE, KY.....................           1,574           1,574
 
                LOUISIANA
 
ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE,                6,645           6,645
 BOEUF & BLACK, LA......................
BARATARIA BAY WATERWAY, LA..............             100             100
BAYOU BODCAU RESERVOIR, LA..............           1,512           1,512
BAYOU LAFOURCHE AND LAFOURCHE JUMP                   769             769
 WATERWAY, LA...........................
BAYOU PIERRE, LA........................              42              42
BAYOU SEGNETTE WATERWAY, LA.............              20              20
BAYOU TECHE AND VERMILION RIVER, LA.....              12              12
BAYOU TECHE, LA.........................              50              50
CADDO LAKE, LA..........................             198             198
CALCASIEU RIVER AND PASS, LA............          20,759          20,759
FRESHWATER BAYOU, LA....................           1,424           1,424
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, LA..........          26,871          26,871
HOUMA NAVIGATION CANAL, LA..............             979             979
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, LA.......             866             866
J BENNETT JOHNSTON WATERWAY, LA.........          12,288          12,288
LAKE PROVIDENCE HARBOR, LA..............              12              12
MADISON PARISH PORT, LA.................             150             150
MERMENTAU RIVER, LA.....................           1,246           1,246
MISSISSIPPI RIVER OUTLETS AT VENICE, LA.           1,449           1,449
MISSISSIPPI RIVER, BATON ROUGE TO THE             83,846          83,846
 GULF OF MEXICO, LA.....................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, LA...........              54              54
REMOVAL OF AQUATIC GROWTH, LA...........             200             200
WALLACE LAKE, LA........................             213             213
WATERWAY FROM EMPIRE TO THE GULF, LA....               8               8
WATERWAY FROM INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY TO                22              22
 BAYOU DULAC, LA........................
 
                  MAINE
 
DISPOSAL AREA MONITORING, ME............           1,050           1,050
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                  5               5
 PROJECTS, ME...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ME.......              95              95
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, ME...........           1,000           1,000
SACO RIVER, ME..........................           4,200           4,200
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                     30              30
 WATERS, ME.............................
WELLS HARBOR, ME........................             400             400
YORK HARBOR, ME.........................           2,500           2,500
 
                MARYLAND
 
BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS (50 FOOT),          25,557          25,557
 MD.....................................
BALTIMORE HARBOR, MD (DRIFT REMOVAL)....             325             325
CUMBERLAND, MD AND RIDGELEY, WV.........             171             171
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MD.......             196             196
JENNINGS RANDOLPH LAKE, MD & WV.........           3,700           3,700
KNAPPS NARROWS, MD......................           2,300           2,300
OCEAN CITY HARBOR AND INLET AND                      250             250
 SINEPUXENT BAY, MD.....................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MD...........             450             450
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MD.....              78              78
WICOMICO RIVER, MD......................           2,000           2,000
 
              MASSACHUSETTS
 
BARRE FALLS DAM, MA.....................             579             579
BIRCH HILL DAM, MA......................             841             841
BUFFUMVILLE LAKE, MA....................             933             933
CAPE COD CANAL, MA......................          13,753          13,753
CHARLES RIVER NATURAL VALLEY STORAGE                 353             353
 AREA, MA...............................
CONANT BROOK LAKE, MA...................             495             495
EAST BRIMFIELD LAKE, MA.................             986             986
HODGES VILLAGE DAM, MA..................             845             845
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 20              20
 PROJECTS, MA...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MA.......             307             307
KNIGHTVILLE DAM, MA.....................           1,054           1,054
LITTLEVILLE LAKE, MA....................             991             991
NEW BEDFORD FAIRHAVEN AND ACUSHNET                 1,302           1,302
 HURRICANE BARRIER, MA..................
NEWBURYPORT HARBOR, MA..................             200             200
PLYMOUTH HARBOR, MA.....................             500             500
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MA...........           1,000           1,000
TULLY LAKE, MA..........................           1,145           1,145
WEST HILL DAM, MA.......................             781             781
WESTVILLE LAKE, MA......................           1,070           1,070
 
                MICHIGAN
 
CHANNELS IN LAKE ST CLAIR, MI...........             185             185
DETROIT RIVER, MI.......................           5,344           5,344
GRAND HAVEN HARBOR, MI..................           1,112           1,112
HOLLAND HARBOR, MI......................           1,600           1,600
INLAND ROUTE, MI........................              50              50
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MI.......             222             222
KEWEENAW WATERWAY, MI...................              12              12
MANISTEE HARBOR, MI.....................             663             663
MONROE HARBOR, MI.......................             650             650
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MI...........             746             746
SAGINAW RIVER, MI.......................           4,044           4,044
SEBEWAING RIVER, MI.....................              54              54
ST CLAIR RIVER, MI......................             699             699
ST JOSEPH HARBOR, MI....................             765             765
ST MARYS RIVER, MI......................          38,440          38,440
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                  2,912           2,912
 WATERS, MI.............................
 
                MINNESOTA
 
BIGSTONE LAKE--WHETSTONE RIVER, MN & SD.             290             290
DULUTH--SUPERIOR HARBOR, MN & WI........           7,594           7,594
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MN.......             401             401
LAC QUI PARLE LAKES, MINNESOTA RIVER, MN           1,115           1,115
MINNESOTA RIVER, MN.....................             263             263
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN MISSOURI RIVER          84,535          84,535
 AND MINNEAPOLIS (MVP PORTION), MN......
ORWELL LAKE, MN.........................             592             592
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MN...........              96              96
RED LAKE RESERVOIR, MN..................             181             181
RESERVOIRS AT HEADWATERS OF MISSISSIPPI            4,924           4,924
 RIVER, MN..............................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    509             509
 WATERS, MN.............................
 
               MISSISSIPPI
 
CLAIBORNE COUNTY PORT, MS...............               1               1
EAST FORK, TOMBIGBEE RIVER, MS..........             285             285
GULFPORT HARBOR, MS.....................           6,350           6,350
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MS.......              86              86
MOUTH OF YAZOO RIVER, MS................              30              30
OKATIBBEE LAKE, MS......................           2,095           2,095
PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MS...................           5,116           5,116
PEARL RIVER, MS & LA....................             150             150
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MS...........             151             151
ROSEDALE HARBOR, MS.....................               8               8
WATER/ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION, MS...              40              40
YAZOO RIVER, MS.........................              19              19
 
                MISSOURI
 
CARUTHERSVILLE HARBOR, MO...............             815             815
CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE,           6,994           6,994
 MO.....................................
CLEARWATER LAKE, MO.....................           4,348           4,348
HARRY S TRUMAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, MO....          19,617          19,617
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                  2               2
 PROJECTS, MO...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MO.......           1,305           1,305
LITTLE BLUE RIVER LAKES, MO.............           1,114           1,114
LONG BRANCH LAKE, MO....................           1,443           1,443
MISSISSIPPI RIVER BETWEEN THE OHIO AND            29,948          29,948
 MISSOURI RIVERS (REG WORKS), MO & IL...
NEW MADRID COUNTY HARBOR, MO............              10              10
NEW MADRID HARBOR, MO (MILE 889)........              15              15
POMME DE TERRE LAKE, MO.................           3,406           3,406
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, MO...........               1               1
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MO.....             169             169
SMITHVILLE LAKE, MO.....................           1,799           1,799
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI PORT, MISSISSIPPI                   9               9
 RIVER, MO..............................
STOCKTON LAKE, MO.......................           5,754           5,754
TABLE ROCK LAKE, MO & AR................          10,354          10,354
 
                 MONTANA
 
FT PECK DAM AND LAKE, MT................           6,035           6,035
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, MT.......             232             232
LIBBY DAM, MT...........................           2,726           2,726
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, MT.....             121             121
 
                NEBRASKA
 
GAVINS POINT DAM, LEWIS AND CLARK LAKE,           11,311          11,311
 NE & SD................................
HARLAN COUNTY LAKE, NE..................           2,483           2,483
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                  3               3
 PROJECTS, NE...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NE.......             932             932
MISSOURI RIVER--KENSLERS BEND, NE TO                  96              96
 SIOUX CITY, IA.........................
PAPILLION CREEK, NE.....................           1,000           1,000
SALT CREEKS AND TRIBUTARIES, NE.........           1,546           1,546
 
                 NEVADA
 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NV.......              68              68
MARTIS CREEK LAKE, NV & CA..............           1,342           1,342
PINE AND MATHEWS CANYONS LAKES, NV......             387             387
 
              NEW HAMPSHIRE
 
BLACKWATER DAM, NH......................             935             935
EDWARD MACDOWELL LAKE, NH...............             846             846
FRANKLIN FALLS DAM, NH..................           1,664           1,664
HOPKINTON--EVERETT LAKES, NH............           2,149           2,149
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NH.......              60              60
OTTER BROOK LAKE, NH....................           1,689           1,689
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NH...........             300             300
SURRY MOUNTAIN LAKE, NH.................           1,191           1,191
 
               NEW JERSEY
 
ABSECON INLET, NJ.......................             175             175
BARNEGAT INLET, NJ......................             450             450
CAPE MAY INLET, NJ......................             200             200
COLD SPRING INLET, NJ...................             380             380
DELAWARE RIVER AT CAMDEN, NJ............              15              15
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA TO THE SEA,          27,370          27,370
 NJ, PA & DE............................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 15              15
 PROJECTS, NJ...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NJ.......             427             427
MANASQUAN RIVER, NJ.....................             435             435
NEW JERSEY INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NJ....             980             980
NEWARK BAY, HACKENSACK AND PASSAIC                25,300          25,300
 RIVERS, NJ.............................
PASSAIC RIVER FLOOD WARNING SYSTEMS, NJ.             605             605
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NJ...........           2,017           2,017
RARITAN RIVER TO ARTHUR KILL CUT-OFF, NJ             100             100
RARITAN RIVER, NJ.......................             220             220
SANDY HOOK BAY AT LEONARD, NJ...........              10              10
SHARK RIVER, NJ.........................             990             990
SHOAL HARBOR AND COMPTON CREEK, NJ......              10              10
SHREWSBURY RIVER, MAIN CHANNEL, NJ......              10              10
 
               NEW MEXICO
 
ABIQUIU DAM, NM.........................           3,437           3,437
COCHITI LAKE, NM........................           3,178           3,178
CONCHAS LAKE, NM........................           5,769           5,769
GALISTEO DAM, NM........................             900             900
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NM.......             652             652
JEMEZ CANYON DAM, NM....................             753             753
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ENDANGERED SPECIES               2,500           2,500
 COLLABORATIVE PROGRAM, NM..............
SANTA ROSA DAM AND LAKE, NM.............           1,583           1,583
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, NM.....             383             383
TWO RIVERS DAM, NM......................             592             592
UPPER RIO GRANDE WATER OPERATIONS MODEL            1,300           1,300
 STUDY, NM..............................
 
                NEW YORK
 
ALMOND LAKE, NY.........................             488             488
ARKPORT DAM, NY.........................             345             345
BAY RIDGE AND RED HOOK CHANNELS, NY.....              50              50
BLACK ROCK CHANNEL AND TONAWANDA HARBOR,           1,834           1,834
 NY.....................................
BRONX RIVER, NY.........................             100             100
BROWNS CREEK, NY........................              30              30
BUFFALO HARBOR, NY......................           2,500           2,500
BUTTERMILK CHANNEL, NY..................              50              50
EAST RIVER, NY..........................             100             100
EAST ROCKAWAY INLET, NY.................             100             100
EAST SIDNEY LAKE, NY....................             797             797
EASTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................              10              10
FIRE ISLAND INLET TO JONES INLET, NY....              50              50
GLEN COVE CREEK, NY.....................              20              20
GREAT KILLS HARBOR, NY..................              50              50
GREAT SOUTH BAY, NY.....................              50              50
HUDSON RIVER CHANNEL, NY................             250             250
HUDSON RIVER, NY (MAINT)................           6,900           6,900
HUDSON RIVER, NY (O & C)................           2,450           2,450
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NY.......           1,351           1,351
JAMAICA BAY, NY.........................             250             250
JONES INLET, NY.........................             420             420
LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR, NY.................             250             250
LONG ISLAND INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NY...             270             270
MATTITUCK HARBOR, NY....................              20              20
MORICHES INLET, NY......................             150             150
MOUNT MORRIS DAM, NY....................           3,892           3,892
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY CHANNELS, NY &               400             400
 NJ.....................................
NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NY & NJ.             760             760
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY.....................           7,743           7,743
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY & NJ (DRIFT REMOVAL)           9,850           9,850
NEW YORK HARBOR, NY (PREVENTION OF                 1,300           1,300
 OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)..................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NY...........           2,323           2,323
SHINNECOCK INLET, NY....................             150             150
SOUTHERN NEW YORK FLOOD CONTROL                      726             726
 PROJECTS, NY...........................
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    610             610
 WATERS, NY.............................
WESTCHESTER CREEK, NY...................              10              10
WHITNEY POINT LAKE, NY..................             960             960
 
             NORTH CAROLINA
 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, NC......           2,812           2,812
B EVERETT JORDAN DAM AND LAKE, NC.......           2,385           2,385
CAPE FEAR RIVER ABOVE WILMINGTON, NC....             462             462
FALLS LAKE, NC..........................           2,494           2,494
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, NC.......             205             205
MANTEO (SHALLOWBAG) BAY, NC.............           4,790           4,790
MASONBORO INLET AND CONNECTING CHANNELS,              50              50
 NC.....................................
MOREHEAD CITY HARBOR, NC................           5,570           5,570
NEW RIVER INLET, NC.....................             250             250
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, NC...........             700             700
ROLLINSON CHANNEL, NC...................           1,000           1,000
SILVER LAKE HARBOR, NC..................             500             500
W KERR SCOTT DAM AND RESERVOIR, NC......           3,363           3,363
WILMINGTON HARBOR, NC...................          14,739          14,739
 
              NORTH DAKOTA
 
BOWMAN HALEY, ND........................             249             249
GARRISON DAM, LAKE SAKAKAWEA, ND........          19,938          19,938
HOMME LAKE, ND..........................             338             338
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, ND.......             374             374
LAKE ASHTABULA AND BALDHILL DAM, ND.....           1,747           1,747
PIPESTEM LAKE, ND.......................             716             716
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, ND.....             121             121
SOURIS RIVER, ND........................           1,584           1,584
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                     82              82
 WATERS, ND.............................
 
                  OHIO
 
ALUM CREEK LAKE, OH.....................           1,592           1,592
BERLIN LAKE, OH.........................           3,093           3,093
CAESAR CREEK LAKE, OH...................           2,315           2,315
CLARENCE J BROWN DAM, OH................           1,324           1,324
CLEVELAND HARBOR, OH....................           6,200           6,200
CONNEAUT HARBOR, OH.....................           2,800           2,800
DEER CREEK LAKE, OH.....................           2,231           2,231
DELAWARE LAKE, OH.......................           1,535           1,535
DILLON LAKE, OH.........................           1,489           1,489
FAIRPORT HARBOR, OH.....................           1,150           1,150
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OH.......             874             874
MASSILLON LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH..              89              89
MICHAEL J KIRWAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, OH..           2,243           2,243
MOSQUITO CREEK LAKE, OH.................           1,216           1,216
MUSKINGUM RIVER LAKES, OH...............          11,836          11,836
NORTH BRANCH KOKOSING RIVER LAKE, OH....             705             705
OHIO-MISSISSIPPI FLOOD CONTROL, OH......           1,818           1,818
PAINT CREEK LAKE, OH....................           1,459           1,459
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OH...........             305             305
ROSEVILLE LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT, OH..              35              35
SANDUSKY HARBOR, OH.....................           1,650           1,650
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    255             255
 WATERS, OH.............................
TOLEDO HARBOR, OH.......................           6,102           6,102
TOM JENKINS DAM, OH.....................             798             798
WEST FORK OF MILL CREEK LAKE, OH........             770             770
WILLIAM H HARSHA LAKE, OH...............           1,281           1,281
 
                OKLAHOMA
 
ARCADIA LAKE, OK........................             724             724
BIRCH LAKE, OK..........................           3,450           3,450
BROKEN BOW LAKE, OK.....................           7,427           7,427
CANTON LAKE, OK.........................           2,148           2,148
COPAN LAKE, OK..........................           2,556           2,556
EUFAULA LAKE, OK........................          18,621          18,621
FORT GIBSON LAKE, OK....................           5,974           5,974
FORT SUPPLY LAKE, OK....................           1,306           1,306
GREAT SALT PLAINS LAKE, OK..............             360             360
HEYBURN LAKE, OK........................             747             747
HUGO LAKE, OK...........................           1,622           1,622
HULAH LAKE, OK..........................             907             907
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OK.......             239             239
KAW LAKE, OK............................           2,398           2,398
KEYSTONE LAKE, OK.......................           5,073           5,073
MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION          29,364          29,364
 SYSTEM, OK.............................
OOLOGAH LAKE, OK........................           2,811           2,811
OPTIMA LAKE, OK.........................              61              61
PENSACOLA RESERVOIR, LAKE OF THE                     165             165
 CHEROKEES, OK..........................
PINE CREEK LAKE, OK.....................           1,439           1,439
SARDIS LAKE, OK.........................           2,245           2,245
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OK.....           1,200           1,200
SKIATOOK LAKE, OK.......................           1,999           1,999
TENKILLER FERRY LAKE, OK................           4,881           4,881
WAURIKA LAKE, OK........................           1,630           1,630
WISTER LAKE, OK.........................             781             781
 
                 OREGON
 
APPLEGATE LAKE, OR......................           1,058           1,058
BLUE RIVER LAKE, OR.....................           1,152           1,152
BONNEVILLE LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA........          10,041          10,041
CHETCO RIVER, OR........................             809             809
COLUMBIA RIVER AT THE MOUTH, OR & WA....          24,131          24,131
COOS BAY, OR............................           7,655           7,655
COTTAGE GROVE LAKE, OR..................           2,247           2,247
COUGAR LAKE, OR.........................           2,160           2,160
DETROIT LAKE, OR........................           5,510           5,510
DORENA LAKE, OR.........................           2,337           2,337
ELK CREEK LAKE, OR......................             359             359
FALL CREEK LAKE, OR.....................           1,527           1,527
FERN RIDGE LAKE, OR.....................           2,231           2,231
GREEN PETER--FOSTER LAKES, OR...........           2,115           2,115
HILLS CREEK LAKE, OR....................           1,177           1,177
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 60              60
 PROJECTS, OR...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, OR.......           1,082           1,082
JOHN DAY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA..........           5,262           5,262
LOOKOUT POINT LAKE, OR..................           1,842           1,842
LOST CREEK LAKE, OR.....................           3,695           3,695
MCNARY LOCK AND DAM, OR & WA............          13,042          13,042
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, OR...........             400             400
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, OR.....              98              98
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    525             525
 WATERS, OR.............................
UMPQUA RIVER, OR........................             921             921
WILLAMETTE RIVER AT WILLAMETTE FALLS, OR              64              64
WILLAMETTE RIVER BANK PROTECTION, OR....             200             200
WILLOW CREEK LAKE, OR...................           1,299           1,299
YAQUINA BAY AND HARBOR, OR..............           3,096           3,096
 
              PENNSYLVANIA
 
ALLEGHENY RIVER, PA.....................          12,043          12,043
ALVIN R BUSH DAM, PA....................             970             970
AYLESWORTH CREEK LAKE, PA...............             624             624
BELTZVILLE LAKE, PA.....................           1,305           1,305
BLUE MARSH LAKE, PA.....................           3,090           3,090
CONEMAUGH RIVER LAKE, PA................           1,345           1,345
COWANESQUE LAKE, PA.....................           2,956           2,956
CROOKED CREEK LAKE, PA..................           1,777           1,777
CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PA...................             900             900
DELAWARE RIVER, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO                4,980           4,980
 TRENTON, NJ............................
EAST BRANCH CLARION RIVER LAKE, PA......           1,399           1,399
FOSTER JOSEPH SAYERS DAM, PA............           2,537           2,537
FRANCIS E WALTER DAM, PA................             875             875
GENERAL EDGAR JADWIN DAM AND RESERVOIR,              395             395
 PA.....................................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 10              10
 PROJECTS, PA...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PA.......           1,117           1,117
JOHNSTOWN, PA...........................              46              46
KINZUA DAM AND ALLEGHENY RESERVOIR, PA..           1,770           1,770
LOYALHANNA LAKE, PA.....................           4,649           4,649
MAHONING CREEK LAKE, PA.................           1,291           1,291
MONONGAHELA RIVER, PA...................          16,759          16,759
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, PA, OH & WV..          39,511          39,511
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, PA, OH &               800             800
 WV.....................................
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PA...........             170             170
PROMPTON LAKE, PA.......................             985             985
PUNXSUTAWNEY, PA........................              15              15
RAYSTOWN LAKE, PA.......................          22,030          22,030
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, PA.....              37              37
SHENANGO RIVER LAKE, PA.................           2,464           2,464
STILLWATER LAKE, PA.....................             843             843
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    105             105
 WATERS, PA.............................
TIOGA--HAMMOND LAKES, PA................           3,084           3,084
TIONESTA LAKE, PA.......................           2,398           2,398
UNION CITY LAKE, PA.....................             471             471
WOODCOCK CREEK LAKE, PA.................           1,015           1,015
YORK INDIAN ROCK DAM, PA................          16,952          16,952
YOUGHIOGHENY RIVER LAKE, PA & MD........           2,708           2,708
 
               PUERTO RICO
 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, PR.......             228             228
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, PR...........             150             150
SAN JUAN HARBOR, PR.....................             100             100
 
              RHODE ISLAND
 
FOX POINT BARRIER, NARRANGANSETT BAY, RI           2,816           2,816
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 25              25
 PROJECTS, RI...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, RI.......              45              45
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, RI...........             300             300
WOONSOCKET, RI..........................             402             402
 
             SOUTH CAROLINA
 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, SC......             199             199
CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC...................          16,109          16,109
COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SC.....           5,007           5,007
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SC.......              65              65
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, SC...........             875             875
 
              SOUTH DAKOTA
 
BIG BEND DAM, LAKE SHARPE, SD...........          10,467          10,467
COLD BROOK LAKE, SD.....................             370             370
COTTONWOOD SPRINGS LAKE, SD.............             226             226
FORT RANDALL DAM, LAKE FRANCIS CASE, SD.          12,576          12,576
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, SD.......             279             279
LAKE TRAVERSE, SD & MN..................             693             693
OAHE DAM, LAKE OAHE, SD & ND............          13,829          13,829
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, SD.....             102             102
 
                TENNESSEE
 
CENTER HILL LAKE, TN....................          10,347          10,347
CHEATHAM LOCK AND DAM, TN...............           8,243           8,243
CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, TENNESSEE RIVER, TN...           6,067           6,067
CORDELL HULL DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN......           7,702           7,702
DALE HOLLOW LAKE, TN....................           9,071           9,071
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TN.......             334             334
J PERCY PRIEST DAM AND RESERVOIR, TN....           5,592           5,592
NORTHWEST TENNESSEE REGIONAL HARBOR,                  10              10
 LAKE COUNTY, TN........................
OLD HICKORY LOCK AND DAM, TN............          10,326          10,326
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TN...........               1               1
TENNESSEE RIVER, TN.....................          22,578          22,578
WOLF RIVER HARBOR, TN...................           1,385           1,385
 
                  TEXAS
 
AQUILLA LAKE, TX........................           1,080           1,080
ARKANSAS--RED RIVER BASINS CHLORIDE                1,794           1,794
 CONTROL--AREA VIII, TX.................
BARDWELL LAKE, TX.......................           3,236           3,236
BELTON LAKE, TX.........................           4,655           4,655
BENBROOK LAKE, TX.......................           3,368           3,368
BRAZOS ISLAND HARBOR, TX................           2,700           2,700
BUFFALO BAYOU AND TRIBUTARIES, TX.......           2,818           2,818
CANYON LAKE, TX.........................           3,449           3,449
CHANNEL TO HARLINGEN, TX................           2,400           2,400
CHANNEL TO PORT BOLIVAR, TX.............              50              50
CORPUS CHRISTI SHIP CHANNEL, TX.........          10,800          10,800
DENISON DAM, LAKE TEXOMA, TX............           8,581           8,581
ESTELLINE SPRINGS EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT,               35              35
 TX.....................................
FERRELLS BRIDGE DAM, LAKE O' THE PINES,            4,041           4,041
 TX.....................................
FREEPORT HARBOR, TX.....................           5,600           5,600
GALVESTON HARBOR AND CHANNEL, TX........           5,000           5,000
GIWW, CHANNEL TO VICTORIA, TX...........           3,500           3,500
GRANGER DAM AND LAKE, TX................           2,311           2,311
GRAPEVINE LAKE, TX......................           4,294           4,294
GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY, TX..........          34,094          34,094
HORDS CREEK LAKE, TX....................           2,036           2,036
HOUSTON SHIP CHANNEL, TX................          31,300          31,300
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, TX.......           1,587           1,587
JIM CHAPMAN LAKE, TX....................           1,975           1,975
JOE POOL LAKE, TX.......................           2,248           2,248
LAKE KEMP, TX...........................             291             291
LAVON LAKE, TX..........................           3,766           3,766
LEWISVILLE DAM, TX......................           4,614           4,614
MATAGORDA SHIP CHANNEL, TX..............           5,900           5,900
NAVARRO MILLS LAKE, TX..................           2,546           2,546
NORTH SAN GABRIEL DAM AND LAKE                     2,558           2,558
 GEORGETOWN, TX.........................
O C FISHER DAM AND LAKE, TX.............           1,091           1,091
PAT MAYSE LAKE, TX......................           1,234           1,234
PROCTOR LAKE, TX........................           2,392           2,392
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, TX...........             323             323
RAY ROBERTS LAKE, TX....................           2,091           2,091
SABINE--NECHES WATERWAY, TX.............           7,725           7,725
SAM RAYBURN DAM AND RESERVOIR, TX.......           7,415           7,415
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, TX.....             332             332
SOMERVILLE LAKE, TX.....................           4,159           4,159
STILLHOUSE HOLLOW DAM, TX...............           5,068           5,068
TEXAS CITY SHIP CHANNEL, TX.............              50              50
TOWN BLUFF DAM, B A STEINHAGEN LAKE, TX.           4,754           4,754
WACO LAKE, TX...........................           6,956           6,956
WALLISVILLE LAKE, TX....................           2,806           2,806
WHITNEY LAKE, TX........................           5,722           5,722
WRIGHT PATMAN DAM AND LAKE, TX..........           3,958           3,958
 
                  UTAH
 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, UT.......              24              24
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, UT.....             554             554
 
                 VERMONT
 
BALL MOUNTAIN, VT.......................           1,019           1,019
GORDONS LANDING, VT.....................             250             250
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VT.......             172             172
NARROWS OF LAKE CHAMPLAIN, VT & NY......              50              50
NORTH HARTLAND LAKE, VT.................           1,311           1,311
NORTH SPRINGFIELD LAKE, VT..............             936             936
TOWNSHEND LAKE, VT......................           1,900           1,900
UNION VILLAGE DAM, VT...................           1,495           1,495
 
             VIRGIN ISLANDS
 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VI.......              24              24
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VI...........             100             100
 
                VIRGINIA
 
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--ACC, VA.           3,627           3,627
ATLANTIC INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY--DSC, VA.           1,852           1,852
CHINCOTEAGUE HARBOR OF REFUGE, VA.......              65              65
CHINCOTEAGUE INLET, VA..................             566             566
GATHRIGHT DAM AND LAKE MOOMAW, VA.......           2,347           2,347
HAMPTON ROADS, NORFOLK & NEWPORT NEWS              1,470           1,470
 HARBOR, VA (DRIFT REMOVAL).............
HAMPTON ROADS, VA (PREVENTION OF                     170             170
 OBSTRUCTIVE DEPOSITS)..................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, VA.......             364             364
JAMES RIVER CHANNEL, VA.................           2,729           2,729
JOHN H KERR LAKE, VA & NC...............          16,229          16,229
JOHN W FLANNAGAN DAM AND RESERVOIR, VA..           3,443           3,443
LYNNHAVEN INLET, VA.....................             600             600
NORFOLK HARBOR, VA......................           9,420           9,420
NORTH FORK OF POUND RIVER LAKE, VA......             590             590
PHILPOTT LAKE, VA.......................           4,871           4,871
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, VA...........           1,195           1,195
RUDEE INLET, VA.........................             520             520
 
               WASHINGTON
 
CHIEF JOSEPH DAM, WA....................             636             636
COLUMBIA AND LOWER WILLAMETTE RIVERS              46,767          46,767
 BELOW VANCOUVER, WA & PORTLAND, OR.....
COLUMBIA RIVER AT BAKER BAY, WA & OR....           1,809           1,809
COLUMBIA RIVER BETWEEN VANCOUVER, WA AND           1,246           1,246
 THE DALLES, OR.........................
COLUMBIA RIVER FISH MITIGATION, WA, OR &           1,907           1,907
 ID.....................................
EVERETT HARBOR AND SNOHOMISH RIVER, WA..           2,281           2,281
GRAYS HARBOR, WA........................          11,710          11,710
HOWARD HANSON DAM, WA...................           3,819           3,819
ICE HARBOR LOCK AND DAM, WA.............           5,510           5,510
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 70              70
 PROJECTS, WA...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WA.......           1,057           1,057
LAKE WASHINGTON SHIP CANAL, WA..........           9,870           9,870
LITTLE GOOSE LOCK AND DAM, WA...........           2,836           2,836
LOWER GRANITE LOCK AND DAM, WA..........           4,532           4,532
LOWER MONUMENTAL LOCK AND DAM, WA.......           3,636           3,636
MILL CREEK LAKE, WA.....................           4,492           4,492
MOUNT SAINT HELENS SEDIMENT CONTROL, WA.             268             268
MUD MOUNTAIN DAM, WA....................           4,962           4,962
PORT TOWNSEND, WA.......................               3               3
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WA...........             779             779
PUGET SOUND AND TRIBUTARY WATERS, WA....           1,913           1,913
QUILLAYUTE RIVER, WA....................             283             283
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WA.....             425             425
SEATTLE HARBOR, WA......................             389             389
STILLAGUAMISH RIVER, WA.................             303             303
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                     64              64
 WATERS, WA.............................
SWINOMISH CHANNEL, WA...................           1,528           1,528
TACOMA HARBOR, WA.......................               5               5
TACOMA, PUYALLUP RIVER, WA..............             226             226
THE DALLES LOCK AND DAM, WA & OR........           3,776           3,776
 
              WEST VIRGINIA
 
BEECH FORK LAKE, WV.....................           1,846           1,846
BLUESTONE LAKE, WV......................           2,283           2,283
BURNSVILLE LAKE, WV.....................           2,495           2,495
EAST LYNN LAKE, WV......................           2,347           2,347
ELKINS, WV..............................              15              15
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WV.......             463             463
KANAWHA RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV........          13,249          13,249
OHIO RIVER LOCKS AND DAMS, WV, KY & OH..          26,835          26,835
OHIO RIVER OPEN CHANNEL WORK, WV, KY &             2,724           2,724
 OH.....................................
R D BAILEY LAKE, WV.....................           2,636           2,636
STONEWALL JACKSON LAKE, WV..............           1,265           1,265
SUMMERSVILLE LAKE, WV...................           2,453           2,453
SUTTON LAKE, WV.........................           2,440           2,440
TYGART LAKE, WV.........................           3,283           3,283
 
                WISCONSIN
 
EAU GALLE RIVER LAKE, WI................           2,199           2,199
FOX RIVER, WI...........................           5,758           5,758
GREEN BAY HARBOR, WI....................           3,911           3,911
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WI.......              55              55
KEWAUNEE HARBOR, WI.....................              12              12
MILWAUKEE HARBOR, WI....................           1,280           1,280
PROJECT CONDITION SURVEYS, WI...........             321             321
SURVEILLANCE OF NORTHERN BOUNDARY                    596             596
 WATERS, WI.............................
 
                 WYOMING
 
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED ENVIRONMENTAL                 10              10
 PROJECTS, WY...........................
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED WORKS, WY.......              80              80
JACKSON HOLE LEVEES, WY.................           1,814           1,814
SCHEDULING RESERVOIR OPERATIONS, WY.....              80              80
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, PROJECTS LISTED UNDER          2,936,254       2,936,254
       STATES...........................
 
             REMAINING ITEMS
 
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK:
    NAVIGATION MAINTENANCE..............  ..............          23,000
        DEEP-DRAFT HARBOR AND CHANNEL...  ..............         287,000
        DONOR AND ENERGY TRANSFER PORTS.  ..............          50,000
        INLAND WATERWAYS................  ..............          13,500
        SMALL, REMOTE, OR SUBSISTENCE     ..............          51,000
         NAVIGATION.....................
    OTHER AUTHORIZED PURPOSES...........  ..............           2,500
AQUATIC NUISANCE CONTROL RESEARCH.......             675             675
ASSET MANAGEMENT/FACILITIES AND EQUIP              3,650           3,650
 MAINT (FEM)............................
 
BUDGET/MANAGEMENT SUPPORT FOR O&M
 BUSINESS PROGRAMS:
    STEWARDSHIP SUPPORT PROGRAM.........             900             900
    PERFORMANCE-BASED BUDGETING SUPPORT            4,200           4,200
     PROGRAM............................
    RECREATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT                  1,550           1,550
     PROGRAM............................
    OPTIMIZATION TOOLS FOR NAVIGATION...             322             322
CIVIL WORKS WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM               10,000          10,000
 (CWWMS)................................
COASTAL INLET RESEARCH PROGRAM..........           2,700           2,975
COASTAL OCEAN DATA SYSTEM (CODS)........           2,500           6,000
CULTURAL RESOURCES (NAGPRA/CURATION)....           1,000           1,000
DREDGE MCFARLAND READY RESERVE..........          11,690          11,690
DREDGE WHEELER READY RESERVE............          15,000          15,000
DREDGING DATA AND LOCK PERFORMANCE                 1,120           1,120
 MONITORING SYSTEM......................
DREDGING OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL              6,450           6,450
 RESEARCH (DOER)........................
DREDGING OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT              2,820           2,820
 PROGRAM (DOTS).........................
EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM....             300             300
FACILITY PROTECTION.....................           4,500           4,500
FISH & WILDLIFE OPERATING FISH HATCHERY            5,400           5,400
 REIMBURSEMENT..........................
HARBOR MAINTENANCE FEE DATA COLLECTION..             795             795
INLAND WATERWAY NAVIGATION CHARTS.......           4,500           4,500
INSPECTION OF COMPLETED FEDERAL FLOOD             20,000          20,000
 CONTROL PROJECTS.......................
MONITORING OF COMPLETED NAVIGATION                 3,300           8,000
 PROJECTS...............................
NATIONAL COASTAL MAPPING PROGRAM........           6,300           6,300
NATIONAL DAM SAFETY PROGRAM (PORTFOLIO            10,000          10,000
 RISK ASSESSMENT).......................
NATIONAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROGRAM            5,500           5,500
 (NEPP).................................
NATIONAL (LEVEE) FLOOD INVENTORY........          10,000          10,000
NATIONAL (MULTIPLE PROJECT) NATURAL                3,700           3,700
 RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES........
NATIONAL PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT FOR                    800             800
 REALLOCATIONS..........................
REGIONAL SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM....           3,500           3,500
REVIEW OF NON-FEDERAL ALTERATIONS OF               8,500           8,500
 CIVIL WORKS PROJECTS (SECTION 408).....
SUSTAINABLE RIVERS PROGRAM (SRP)........             400             400
VETERAN'S CURATION PROGRAM AND                     6,500           6,500
 COLLECTIONS MANAGEMENT.................
WATERBORNE COMMERCE STATISTICS..........           4,670           4,670
WATER OPERATIONS TECHNICAL SUPPORT                   500           5,500
 (WOTS).................................
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS.........         163,742         604,217
 
ACCOUNTING ADJUSTMENT...................               4               4
SAVINGS AND SLIPPAGE....................  ..............         -59,000
                                         -------------------------------
      TOTAL, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE..       3,100,000       3,481,475
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Beneficial Use of Dredged Materials.--The Committee directs 
the Corps to complete its Implementation Guidance for the 
Beneficial Use of Dredged Material program authorized in 
section 1122 of the WIIN Act and move into timely 
implementation, including selection of pilot projects. The 
Committee supports the Corps' efforts to proceed with 
beneficial use as a regular part of its dredging activities in 
order to achieve efficiencies and cost reductions.
    Coastal Inlets Research Program.--Additional funding is 
recommended in the Coastal Inlets Research Program for the 
Corps to work with the National Ocean and Atmospheric 
Administration's National Water Center on protecting the 
Nation's water resources.
    Dam Optimization.--The Corps is urged not to carry out any 
reservoir reoperation or reallocation for authorized purposes 
at any Corps facilities with funds from any non-Federal entity 
other than the non-Federal sponsor until the Corps has 
completed all public outreach and coordination and submitted to 
the relevant authorizing and appropriations Committees and the 
congressional delegation representing such facility, a detailed 
analysis of the change in operations of the reservoir, and 
specific information on whether the activities would alter 
availability of water for existing authorized purposes at such 
facility, as well as compensation for lost water that would be 
necessary to make users whole if such activities were carried 
out.
    Donor Ports and Energy Transfer Ports.--The additional 
funding recommended in this account for donor and energy 
transfer ports shall be allocated in accordance with 33 U.S.C. 
2238c.
    Isle of Shoals North and Cape Arundel Dredged Material 
Placement Site.--The Cape Arundel Disposal Site in the State of 
Maine selected by the Department of the Army as an alternative 
dredged material disposal site under section 103(b) of the 
Marine Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, shall 
remain open until April 15, 2024, until the remaining disposal 
capacity of the site has been utilized, or until final 
designation of an Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site for 
southern Maine under section 102(c) of the Marine Protection 
Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972, whichever first occurs, 
provided that the site conditions remain suitable for such 
purpose and that the site may not be used for disposal of more 
than 80,000 cubic yards from any single dredging project.
    Kennebec River Federal Navigation Channel.--The Committee 
is concerned that the Kennebec River Federal Navigation Channel 
required emergency dredging in 2017 to allow the safe passage 
of a newly constructed Navy guided missile destroyer to the 
Atlantic Ocean. The Committee believes the development of a 
long-term, resourced plan for the periodic sounding and 
dredging of the Kennebec River is necessary to prevent 
potential future impacts to the fleet and national security. 
Accordingly, the Committee directs the Assistant Secretary of 
the Army (Civil Works), in consultation with the Navy, to 
submit a report within 270 days after the date of enactment of 
this act to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress, proposing a long-term plan for regular maintenance 
dredging of the Kennebec River. This report shall include 
detailed information on funding requirements and sources, as 
well as any legislative proposals for new authorities necessary 
to implement the proposed plan.
    Medium Size Ports.--The Committee emphasizes the importance 
of ensuring the continued development and maintenance of our 
country's medium size ports. The Committee urges the Corps to 
consider projects proposed at medium size ports relative to the 
needs and potential impact of their surrounding communities in 
the fiscal year 2018 Work Plan.
    Monitoring of Completed Navigation Projects.--The Committee 
supports the Corps' efforts to significantly improve the 
safety, efficiency, reliability and cost of performing 
inspections of critical and aging infrastructure. To accelerate 
the delivery and deployment of innovative technologies for 
infrastructure inspection on the national level, the Committee 
urges the Corps to continue to prioritize funding for the 
validation of proven innovative practices and technologies.
    Of the funding provided, $3,700,000 shall be for the 
Structural Health Monitoring Program to facilitate research and 
maximize operations, efficiency, and to protect asset life 
through catastrophic failure mitigation.
    The Committee is concerned that a reduction in or 
elimination of navigational lock operations on the Nation's 
inland waterways is having a negative impact on river 
ecosystems, particularly the ability of a number of endangered, 
threatened and game fish species to migrate through waterways, 
particularly during critical spawning periods. The Committee is 
aware of preliminary research that indicates reduced lock 
operations on certain Corps designated low-use waterways is 
directly impacting migration, and that there are effective 
means to mitigate the impacts. The Committee believes 
maximizing the ability of fish to use these locks to move past 
the dams has the potential to restore natural and historic 
long-distance river migrations that may well be critical to 
species survival. In fiscal year 2017, Congress provided 
funding to continue preliminary research on the impact of 
reduced lock operations on riverine fish. The Committee 
understands the research underway is proving valuable and, 
within available funds for ongoing work, recommends $2,000,000 
for the Corps to continue this research. The goal of the 
continued funding is to support the continuing research and, 
where appropriate, expand the work to look at ecosystem level 
impacts and additional waterways, lock structures, lock 
operation methods, and fish species that will more fully inform 
Corps operations.
    Section 408 Reviews.--The Committee directs the Corps to 
complete section 408 reviews as expeditiously as possible, in a 
transparent manner, and in a reasonable timeframe. In 
recognition of the current, significant backlog in this program 
and the lag in review times, the Committee recommends 
$8,500,000, the same as the budget request and $5,200,000 above 
fiscal year 2017 enacted levels for section 408 reviews. Not 
later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this act, the 
Corps shall submit a report to the Committees on Appropriations 
of both Houses of Congress on the number of non-Federal 
projects in each Corps district that requested approval to 
alter existing Civil Works projects in fiscal years 2016 and 
2017, and the average review time for such requests for each 
District.
    The Committee is concerned that the Corps exhausted its 
fiscal year 2017 funds used to review section 408 packages, but 
the administration failed to identify additional funds for this 
purpose in its fiscal year 2017 work plan. As a result, the 
Corps halted section 408 reviews, leaving several projects in 
limbo at least until the start of fiscal year 2018. The Corps 
shall expedite the review of section 408 submissions wherever 
possible, including using the WRDA 2000 section 214 process 
where available. The Committee also directs the Corps to 
consider policies that would free up Corps resources to review 
section 408 submissions more expeditiously in the future, such 
as accepting certifications from private engineers and land 
surveyors, similar to processes used by the Federal Highway 
Administration, and to approve section 408 requests at the 
division level rather than the headquarters level wherever 
possible.
    Lower Yellowstone Intake Project.--The Committee is 
concerned regarding continued delays in resolving issues 
surrounding the Lower Yellowstone Intake Project. The Committee 
strongly encourages the Corps and Bureau of Reclamation to 
assure the community and stakeholders of the agencies' 
continued support for resolving issues impacting local 
agriculture producers and fisheries. Further, the Committee 
directs the Corps and Bureau of Reclamation to refrain from 
reallocating funding from the proposed fish passage project 
until judicial challenges to the project are resolved.
    Water Operations Technical Support.--Funding in addition to 
the budget request is recommended to continue research into 
atmospheric rivers first funded in fiscal year 2015.
    WRRDA Section 4001.--Congress has made clear its intent 
that the Susquehanna, Delaware, and Potomac River Basin 
Commissions be supported, and the Corps is encouraged to budget 
accordingly.
    WRRDA Section 6002.--The Committee supports the Corps' 
performing a review of its inventory, in accordance with 
section 6002 of the WRRDA 2014, not later than 1 year after the 
date of enactment of this act.
    Additional Funding for Ongoing Work.--The Committee cannot 
support a level of funding that does not fund operation and 
maintenance of our Nation's aging infrastructure sufficiently 
to ensure continued competitiveness in a global marketplace. 
Federal navigation channels maintained at only a fraction of 
authorized dimensions and navigation locks and hydropower 
facilities well beyond their design life result in economic 
inefficiencies and risk infrastructure failure, which can cause 
substantial economic losses. The Committee is disappointed the 
fiscal year 2018 budget request does not adequately fund 
operation and maintenance of our Nation's ports. WRRDA 2014, as 
amended by the WIIN Act, included an annual appropriation 
target for use of the HMTF. Despite providing a budget request 
that was near the fiscal year 2017 enacted levels, the 
administration failed to include projects in the budget request 
that are HMTF reimbursable commensurate with the targets 
established by law. Additional funding is recommended for 
dredging activities to restore navigation channels as 
determined by river stages.
    The Committee is concerned that the administration's 
criteria for navigation maintenance disadvantage small, remote, 
or subsistence harbors and waterways from competing for scarce 
navigation maintenance funds. Accordingly, the Committee 
directs the Corps to revise the criteria used for determining 
which navigation maintenance projects are funded to develop a 
reasonable and equitable allocation under the Operation and 
Maintenance account. The Committee supports including criteria 
to evaluate economic impact that these projects provide to 
local and regional economies.
    The Committee recommendation includes additional funds for 
projects and activities to enhance the Nation's economic growth 
and international competitiveness. When allocating the 
additional funding recommended in this account, the Corps shall 
consider giving priority to the following:
  --ability to complete ongoing work maintaining authorized 
        depths and widths of harbors and shipping channels 
        (including small, remote, or subsistence harbors), 
        including where contaminated sediments are present;
  --ability to address critical maintenance backlog;
  --presence of the U.S. Coast Guard;
  --extent to which the work will enhance national, regional, 
        or local economic development;
  --extent to which the work will promote job growth or 
        international competitiveness;
  --number of jobs created directly by the funded activity;
  --ability to obligate the funds allocated within the calendar 
        year;
  --ability to complete the project, separable element, project 
        phase, or useful increment of work within the funds 
        allocated;
  --for harbor maintenance activities:
    --total tonnage handled,
    --total exports,
    --total imports,
    --dollar value of cargo handled,
    --energy infrastructure and national security needs served,
    --designation as strategic seaports,
    --lack of alternative means of freight movement, and
    --savings over alternative means of freight movement.
    For deep-draft harbor and channel maintenance, the Corps 
shall give priority to funding strategic commercial seaports, 
as designated by the Department of Defense, in the fiscal year 
2018 work plan.

                           REGULATORY PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $200,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     200,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     200,000,000

    The Committee recommends $200,000,000 for the Regulatory 
Program, the same as the budget request.
    Aquaculture Activities.--The Committee is encouraged by the 
progress the Corps has made to process permit requests from 
shellfish growers in the State of Washington to initiate or 
expand aquaculture activities. The Committee is aware that the 
Corps initiated a process through which permits recently issued 
under the 2012 Nationwide Permit 48 can be verified under the 
2017 Nationwide Permit 48 that went into effect on March 19, 
2017. The Corps is directed to expeditiously process these 
requests using the final Biological Opinion and in accordance 
with the 2017 Nationwide Permit 48. The Corps is encouraged to 
communicate directly with the regulated industry and other 
interested stakeholders to ensure all have clarity on 
permitting requirements.

            FORMERLY UTILIZED SITES REMEDIAL ACTION PROGRAM

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $112,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     118,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     117,000,000

    The Committee recommends $117,000,000 for the Formerly 
Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program, $1,000,000 below the 
budget request.

                 FLOOD CONTROL AND COASTAL EMERGENCIES

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $32,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      35,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      21,904,000

    The Committee recommends $21,904,000 for Flood Control and 
Coastal Emergencies a decrease of $13,096,000 from the budget 
request. The Corps is directed to use $10,096,000 from prior 
year balances.

                                EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $181,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     185,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     185,000,000

    The Committee recommends $185,000,000 for Expenses, the 
same as the budget request. This appropriation finances the 
expenses for the Office of the Chief of Engineers, the Division 
Offices, and certain research and statistical functions of the 
Corps. No funding is recommended for creation of an Office of 
Congressional Affairs.

     OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY FOR CIVIL WORKS

Appropriations, 2017....................................      $4,764,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       5,000,000
Committee recommendation................................       4,406,000

    The Committee recommends $4,406,000 for the Office of the 
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), $594,000 below 
the budget request.
    The Committee counts on a timely and accessible executive 
branch in the course of fulfilling its constitutional role in 
the appropriations process. The requesting and receiving of 
basic, factual information is vital to maintain a transparent 
and open governing process. The Committee recognizes that some 
discussions internal to the executive branch are pre-decisional 
in nature and, therefore, not subject to disclosure. However, 
the access to facts, figures, and statistics that inform these 
decisions are not subject to the same sensitivity and are 
critical to the budget process. The administration needs to do 
more to ensure timely and complete responses to these 
inquiries.

             GENERAL PROVISIONS--CORPS OF ENGINEERS--CIVIL

    Section 101. The bill includes language concerning 
reprogramming guidelines.
    Section 102. The bill includes language concerning 
execution of funds.
    Section 103. The bill includes language concerning award or 
modifications of funding.
    Section 104. The bill includes language concerning funding 
transfers related to fish hatcheries.
    Section 105. The bill includes language concerning the open 
lake placement of dredged material.
    Section 106. The bill includes language concerning 
acquisitions consistent with the Code of Federal Regulations.
    Section 107. The bill includes language regarding Wolf 
Creek Dam, Lake Cumberland, KY.
    Section 108. The bill includes language regarding 
submission of an interim report.
    Section 109. The bill includes language regarding Rough 
River Lake.
    Section 110. The bill includes language regarding cost-
sharing of projects.

                                TITLE II

                       DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

                          CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT

                CENTRAL UTAH PROJECT COMPLETION ACCOUNT

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $10,500,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       8,983,000
Committee recommendation................................      10,500,000

    The Committee recommends $10,500,000 for the Central Utah 
Project Completion Account, which includes $8,152,000 for 
Central Utah Project construction, $898,000 for transfer to the 
Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Account for use by 
the Utah Reclamation Mitigation and Conservation Commission, 
$1,450,000 for necessary expenses of the Secretary of the 
Interior, and up to $1,500,000 for the Commission's 
administrative expenses. This program allows the Department of 
the Interior to develop water supply facilities that will 
continue to sustain economic growth and an enhanced quality of 
life in the western States, the fastest growing region in the 
United States. The Committee remains committed to completing 
the Central Utah Project, which would enable the project to 
initiate repayment to the Federal Government.

                         Bureau of Reclamation

                       OVERVIEW OF RECOMMENDATION

    The Committee recommends $1,287,725,000 for the Bureau of 
Reclamation [Reclamation], an increase of $190,332,000 from the 
budget request. The Committee recommendation sets priorities by 
supporting our Nation's water infrastructure.

                              INTRODUCTION

    In addition to the traditional missions of bringing water 
and power to the West, Reclamation continues to develop 
programs, initiatives, and activities that will help meet new 
water needs and balance the multitude of competing uses of 
water in the West. Reclamation is the largest wholesaler of 
water in the country, operating 348 reservoirs with a total 
storage capacity of 245 million acre-feet. Reclamation projects 
deliver 10 trillion gallons of water to more than 31 million 
people each year, and provide 1 out of 5 western farmers with 
irrigation water for 10 million acres of farmland that produce 
60 percent of the Nation's vegetables and 25 percent of its 
fruits and nuts. Reclamation manages, with partners, 289 
recreation sites that have 90 million visits annually.

                       FISCAL YEAR 2018 WORK PLAN

    The Committee has recommended funding above the budget 
request for Water and Related Resources. Reclamation is 
directed to submit a work plan, not later than 60 days after 
the date of enactment of this act, to the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress proposing its 
allocation of these additional funds. Reclamation is directed 
not to obligate any funding above the budget request for 
studies or projects until the Committees have approved the work 
plan for fiscal year 2018. The work plan shall be consistent 
with the following general guidance:
  --None of the funds may be used for any item for which the 
        Committee has specifically denied funding.
  --The additional funds are provided for ongoing studies or 
        projects that were either not included in the budget 
        request or for which the budget request was inadequate.
  --Funding associated with a category may be allocated to 
        eligible studies or projects within that category.
  --Reclamation may not withhold funding from a study or 
        project because it is inconsistent with administration 
        policy. The Committee notes that these funds are in 
        excess of the administration's budget request, and that 
        administration budget metrics should not disqualify a 
        study or project from being funded.

                             REPROGRAMMING

    The Committee is retaining the reprogramming legislation 
provided in the Energy and Water Development and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017.

                           DROUGHT RESILIENCY

    The Committee has invested approximately $300,000,000 over 
the past 3 years in drought and water supply-related 
activities. The Committee remains intently focused on the need 
for substantially increased investment in improving drought 
resiliency as well as in finding opportunities for agencies to 
combine water supply benefits with other mission priorities. In 
the fiscal year 2017 Energy and Water Appropriations bill, the 
Committee began the transition from mitigating an ongoing 
drought in the West to preparing for the next one. The 
Committee continues that approach in this year's bill by 
recommending another $98,000,000 for the drought resiliency 
programs authorized in the WIIN Act.
    The Committee directs Reclamation to continue working with 
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Marine 
Fisheries Service, and relevant state agencies to undertake 
comprehensive, around the clock, real-time monitoring of water 
supply conditions and their impact on endangered species during 
critical periods in the winter and spring.
    The Committee believes that the only answer to these 
chronic droughts is a combination of additional storage, 
substantial investments in desalination and recycling, improved 
conveyance, and increased efficiencies in the uses of water 
both for agriculture and potable purposes. As the West has 
consistently been the fastest growing part of the country, it 
is incumbent on Reclamation to lead the way in increasing the 
water that is available from year to year and to incentivize 
more efficient use of the water that is available.

                   CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING

    The Committee did not accept or include congressionally 
directed spending, as defined in section 5(a) of rule XLIV of 
the Standing Rules of the Senate. However, the Committee has 
recommended additional programmatic funds above the budget 
request for the Water and Related Resources account. In some 
cases, these additional funds have been included within defined 
categories, as in prior years, and are described in more detail 
in their respective sections below.

                      WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $1,155,894,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     960,017,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,150,349,000

    The Committee recommends $1,150,349,000 for Water and 
Related Resources, an increase of $190,332,000 above the budget 
request.

                              INTRODUCTION

    The Water and Related Resources account supports the 
development, management, and restoration of water and related 
natural resources in the 17 western States. The account 
includes funds for operating and maintaining existing 
facilities to obtain the greatest overall level of benefits, to 
protect public safety, and to conduct studies on ways to 
improve the use of water and related natural resources. Work 
will be done in partnership and cooperation with non-Federal 
entities and other Federal agencies.
    The Committee has recommended increased funding in the 
Water and Related Resources account on a number of line items 
to better allow Reclamation to address the immediate impacts of 
the drought.

                               BUREAU OF RECLAMATION--WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Budget estimate            Committee recommendation
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
                  Project title                      Resources      Facilities       Resources      Facilities
                                                    management         OM&R         management         OM&R
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                     ARIZONA
 
AK CHIN INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENT ACT        ..............          16,200  ..............          16,200
 PROJECT........................................
COLORADO RIVER BASIN--CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT...           6,272             648           6,272             648
COLORADO RIVER FRONT WORK AND LEVEE SYSTEM......           2,303  ..............           2,303  ..............
SALT RIVER PROJECT..............................             649             250             649             250
SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE WATER SETTLEMENT ACT               1,550  ..............           1,550  ..............
 PROJECT........................................
YUMA AREA PROJECTS..............................           1,332          23,032           1,332          23,032
 
                   CALIFORNIA
 
CACHUMA PROJECT.................................             747             874             747             874
CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECTS:........................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............
    AMERICAN RIVER DIVISION, FOLSOM DAM UNIT/              1,577           9,138           1,577           9,138
     MORMON ISLAND..............................
    AUBURN-FOLSOM SOUTH UNIT....................              35           2,184              35           2,184
    DELTA DIVISION..............................           6,308           6,520           6,308           6,520
    EAST SIDE DIVISION..........................           1,290           2,772           1,290           2,772
    FRIANT DIVISION.............................           1,649           3,301           1,649           3,301
    SAN JOAQUIN RIVER RESTORATION...............          34,000  ..............          34,000  ..............
    MISCELLANEOUS PROJECT PROGRAMS..............           8,771             400           8,771             400
    REPLACEMENTS, ADDITIONS, AND EXTRAORDINARY    ..............          17,444  ..............          17,444
     MAINT. PROGRAM.............................
    SACRAMENTO RIVER DIVISION...................           1,307             595           1,307             595
    SAN FELIPE DIVISION.........................             232              75             232              75
    SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION........................              52  ..............              52  ..............
    SHASTA DIVISION.............................             720           9,007             720           9,007
    TRINITY RIVER DIVISION......................          12,309           5,177          12,309           5,177
    WATER AND POWER OPERATIONS..................           5,989          10,793           5,989          10,793
    WEST SAN JOAQUIN DIVISION, SAN LUIS UNIT....           3,357           6,026           3,357           6,026
ORLAND PROJECT..................................  ..............             930  ..............             930
SALTON SEA RESEARCH PROJECT.....................             300  ..............             300  ..............
SOLANO PROJECT..................................           1,329           2,367           1,329           2,367
VENTURA RIVER PROJECT...........................             313              33             313              33
 
                    COLORADO
 
ANIMAS-LA PLATA PROJECT.........................             941           3,004             941           3,004
ARMEL UNIT, P-SMBP..............................               5           1,738               5           1,738
COLLBRAN PROJECT................................             247           1,984             247           1,984
COLORADO-BIG THOMPSON PROJECT...................             726          13,372             726          13,372
FRUITGROWERS DAM PROJECT........................              93             131              93             131
FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT......................             167          10,091             167          10,091
FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT--ARKANSAS VALLEY                3,000  ..............           3,000  ..............
 CONDUIT........................................
GRAND VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II.............             486           1,809             486           1,809
LEADVILLE/ARKANSAS RIVER RECOVERY PROJECT.......  ..............           1,935  ..............           1,935
MANCOS PROJECT..................................              76             240              76             240
NARROWS UNIT, P-SMBP............................  ..............              38  ..............              38
PARADOX VALLEY UNIT, CRBSCP, TITLE II...........             389           3,003             389           3,003
PINE RIVER PROJECT..............................             141             432             141             432
SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CLOSED BASIN...........             301           3,219             301           3,219
SAN LUIS VALLEY PROJECT, CONEJOS DIVISION.......              16              34              16              34
UNCOMPAHGRE PROJECT.............................             728             163             728             163
UPPER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM.........           1,570  ..............           1,570  ..............
 
                      IDAHO
 
BOISE AREA PROJECTS.............................           3,383           4,522           3,383           4,522
COLUMBIA AND SNAKE RIVER SALMON RECOVERY PROJECT          19,000  ..............          19,000  ..............
LEWISTON ORCHARDS PROJECTS......................           1,400              27           1,400              27
MINIDOKA AREA PROJECTS..........................           2,442           2,438           2,442           2,438
PRESTON BENCH PROJECT...........................              17               8              17               8
 
                     KANSAS
 
ALMENA UNIT, P-SMBP.............................              43             480              43             480
BOSTWICK UNIT, P-SMBP...........................             370             884             370             884
CEDAR BLUFF UNIT, P-SMBP........................              40             552              40             552
GLEN ELDER UNIT, P-SMBP.........................              65           2,581              65           2,581
KANSAS RIVER UNIT, P-SMBP.......................  ..............             102  ..............             102
KIRWIN UNIT, P-SMBP.............................              37             461              37             461
WEBSTER UNIT, P-SMBP............................              15             500              15             500
WICHITA PROJECT--CHENEY DIVISION................              98             391              98             391
 
                     MONTANA
 
BLACKFEET IWRS..................................          10,000  ..............  ..............  ..............
CANYON FERRY UNIT, P-SMBP.......................             249           5,047             249           5,047
CROW TRIBE WATER RIGHTS.........................          12,772  ..............  ..............  ..............
EAST BENCH UNIT, P-SMBP.........................             205             675             205             675
FORT PECK RESERVATION/DRY PRAIRIE RURAL WATER              6,000  ..............           6,000  ..............
 SYSTEM.........................................
HELENA VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP......................              19             165              19             165
HUNGRY HORSE PROJECT............................  ..............             453  ..............             453
HUNTLEY PROJECT.................................              12              46              12              46
LOWER MARIAS UNIT, P-SMBP.......................             103           1,507             103           1,507
LOWER YELLOWSTONE PROJECT.......................             716              16             716              16
MILK RIVER PROJECT..............................             553           2,951             553           2,951
MISSOURI BASIN O&M, P-SMBP......................           1,045             167           1,045             167
ROCKY BOYS/NORTH CENTRAL MT RURAL WATER SYSTEM..           4,850  ..............           4,850  ..............
SUN RIVER PROJECT...............................             154             283             154             283
YELLOWTAIL UNIT, P-SMBP.........................              22           8,021              22           8,021
 
                    NEBRASKA
 
AINSWORTH UNIT, P-SMBP..........................              71              98              71              98
FRENCHMAN-CAMBRIDGE UNIT, P-SMBP................             326           1,860             326           1,860
MIRAGE FLATS PROJECT............................              13              93              13              93
NORTH LOUP UNIT, P-SMBP.........................              90             124              90             124
 
                     NEVADA
 
LAHONTAN BASIN PROJECT..........................           4,992           4,859           4,992           4,859
LAKE TAHOE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.........             115  ..............             115  ..............
LAKE MEAD/LAS VEGAS WASH PROGRAM................             700  ..............             700  ..............
 
                   NEW MEXICO
 
AAMODT LITIGATION SETTLEMENT....................           8,000  ..............  ..............  ..............
CARLSBAD PROJECT................................           2,790           1,339           2,790           1,339
EASTERN NEW MEXICO RURAL WATER SUPPLY...........           1,875  ..............           1,875  ..............
MIDDLE RIO GRANDE PROJECT.......................          12,682          11,836          12,682          11,836
NAVAJO GALLUP WATER SUPPLY......................          67,772              25  ..............  ..............
RIO GRANDE PROJECT..............................           1,906           4,750           1,906           4,750
RIO GRANDE PEUBLOS PROJECT......................           1,000  ..............           1,000  ..............
TUCUMCARI PROJECT...............................              15              16              15              16
 
                  NORTH DAKOTA
 
DICKINSON UNIT, P-SMBP..........................             214             435             214             435
GARRISON DIVERSION UNIT, P-SMBP.................          13,235          12,934          13,235          12,934
HEART BUTTE UNIT, P-SMBP........................              82           1,322              82           1,322
 
                    OKLAHOMA
 
ARBUCKLE PROJECT................................              67             174              67             174
MCGEE CREEK PROJECT.............................             188             802             188             802
MOUNTAIN PARK PROJECT...........................              53             617              53             617
NORMAN PROJECT..................................              71             301              71             301
WASHITA BASIN PROJECT...........................              58             554              58             554
W.C. AUSTIN PROJECT.............................             242           1,091             242           1,091
 
                     OREGON
 
CROOKED RIVER PROJECT...........................             403             533             403             533
DESCHUTES PROJECT...............................             384             230             384             230
EASTERN OREGON PROJECTS.........................             533             213             533             213
KLAMATH PROJECT.................................          13,514           4,486          13,514           4,486
ROGUE RIVER BASIN PROJECT, TALENT DIVISION......           2,072             686           2,072             686
TUALATIN PROJECT................................             201             218             201             218
UMATILLA PROJECT................................             556           2,931             556           2,931
 
                  SOUTH DAKOTA
 
ANGOSTURA UNIT, P-SMBP..........................             249             694             249             694
BELLE FOURCHE UNIT, P-SMBP......................             271             730             271             730
KEYHOLE UNIT, P-SMBP............................             198             610             198             610
LEWIS AND CLARK RURAL WATER SYSTEM..............           3,650  ..............           3,650  ..............
MID-DAKOTA RURAL WATER PROJECT..................  ..............              15  ..............              15
MNI WICONI PROJECT..............................  ..............          13,475  ..............          13,475
OAHE UNIT, P-SMBP...............................              37              73              37              73
RAPID VALLEY PROJECT............................  ..............              71  ..............              71
RAPID VALLEY UNIT, P-SMBP.......................  ..............             200  ..............             200
SHADEHILL UNIT, P-SMBP..........................              75             466              75             466
 
                      TEXAS
 
BALMORHEA PROJECT...............................              37              13              37              13
CANADIAN RIVER PROJECT..........................              58             108              58             108
LOWER RIO GRANDE WATER RESOURCES CONSERVATION                 50  ..............              50  ..............
 PROGRAM........................................
NUECES RIVER PROJECT............................             107             803             107             803
SAN ANGELO PROJECT..............................              38             596              38             596
 
                      UTAH
 
HYRUM PROJECT...................................             183             158             183             158
MOON LAKE PROJECT...............................              28              92              28              92
NEWTON PROJECT..................................              67             103              67             103
OGDEN RIVER PROJECT.............................             242             233             242             233
PROVO RIVER PROJECT.............................           1,224             718           1,224             718
SANPETE PROJECT.................................              73              10              73              10
SCOFIELD PROJECT................................             304              81             304              81
STRAWBERRY VALLEY PROJECT.......................             433             100             433             100
WEBER BASIN PROJECT.............................           1,047             860           1,047             860
WEBER RIVER PROJECT.............................             131             102             131             102
 
                   WASHINGTON
 
COLUMBIA BASIN PROJECT..........................           3,961           9,414           3,961           9,414
WASHINGTON AREA PROJECTS........................             445              63             445              63
YAKIMA PROJECT..................................             744           6,083             744           6,083
YAKIMA RIVER BASIN WATER ENHANCEMENT PROJECT....          17,136  ..............          17,136  ..............
 
                     WYOMING
 
BOYSEN UNIT, P-SMBP.............................             232           1,875             232           1,875
BUFFALO BILL DAM, DAM MODIFICATION, P-SMBP......              32           2,731              32           2,731
KENDRICK PROJECT................................              78           5,626              78           5,626
NORTH PLATTE PROJECT............................             178           1,197             178           1,197
NORTH PLATTE AREA, P-SMBP.......................              97           5,266              97           5,266
OWL CREEK UNIT, P-SMBP..........................               6              93               6              93
RIVERTON UNIT, P-SMBP...........................               8             572               8             572
SHOSHONE PROJECT................................              77             746              77             746
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, ITEMS UNDER STATES..............         330,603         297,740         232,059         297,715
                                                 ===============================================================
                 REMAINING ITEMS
 
ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ONGOING WORK:
 
    RURAL WATER.................................  ..............  ..............          48,000  ..............
    FISH PASSAGE AND FISH SCREENS...............  ..............  ..............           5,000  ..............
    WATER CONSERVATION AND DELIVERY.............  ..............  ..............          84,000  ..............
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND COMPLIANCE....  ..............  ..............          15,000  ..............
    FACILITIES OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND        ..............  ..............  ..............           1,800
     REHABILITATION.............................
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT,               250          15,203             250          15,203
 TITLE I........................................
COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROJECT,             8,374  ..............           8,374  ..............
 TITLE II.......................................
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP), SECTION 5           4,153           6,485           4,153           6,485
COLORADO RIVER STORAGE PROJECT (CRSP), SECTION 8           2,770  ..............           2,770  ..............
COLORADO RIVER WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT             640  ..............             640  ..............
 
DAM SAFETY PROGRAM:
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DAM SAFETY         ..............           1,300  ..............           1,300
     PROGRAM....................................
    INITIATE SAFETY OF DAMS CORRECTIVE ACTION...  ..............          66,500  ..............          66,500
    SAFETY EVALUATION OF EXISTING DAMS..........  ..............          20,284  ..............          20,284
EMERGENCY PLANNING & DISASTER RESPONSE PROGRAM..  ..............           1,250  ..............           1,250
ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY IMPLEMENTATION                19,645  ..............          19,645  ..............
 PROGRAM........................................
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION............           1,844  ..............           1,844  ..............
EXAMINATION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES..............  ..............           8,873  ..............           8,873
GENERAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES.....................           2,124  ..............           2,124  ..............
 
INDIAN WATER RIGHTS SETTLEMENTS:
    AAMODT LITIGATION SETTLEMENT................  ..............  ..............           8,000  ..............
    BLACKFEET...................................  ..............  ..............          10,000  ..............
    CROW TRIBE RIGHTS...........................  ..............  ..............          12,772  ..............
    NAVAJO-GALLUP...............................  ..............  ..............          67,772              25
LAND RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM...............           9,996  ..............           9,996  ..............
LOWER COLORADO RIVER OPERATIONS PROGRAM.........          33,433  ..............          33,433  ..............
MISCELLANEOUS FLOOD CONTROL OPERATIONS..........  ..............             927  ..............             927
NATIVE AMERICAN AFFAIRS PROGRAM.................          10,425  ..............          11,425  ..............
NEGOTIATION & ADMINISTRATION OF WATER MARKETING.           1,981  ..............           1,981  ..............
OPERATION & PROGRAM MANAGEMENT..................             901           2,764             901           2,764
POWER PROGRAM SERVICES..........................           2,391             307           2,391             307
PUBLIC ACCESS AND SAFETY PROGRAM................             597             206             597             206
RECLAMATION LAW ADMINISTRATION..................           2,173  ..............           2,173  ..............
RECREATION & FISH & WILDLIFE PROGRAM                       6,497  ..............           6,497  ..............
 ADMINISTRATION.................................
 
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT:
    DESALINATION AND WATER PURIFICATION PROGRAM.           1,753           1,150          10,653           1,150
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM..............          11,065  ..............          22,765  ..............
SITE SECURITY ACTIVITIES........................  ..............          26,220  ..............          26,220
UNITED STATES/MEXICO BORDER ISSUES--TECHNICAL                 90  ..............              90  ..............
 SUPPORT........................................
 
WATERSMART PROGRAM:
    WATERSMART GRANTS...........................          23,365  ..............          24,000  ..............
    WATER CONSERVATION FIELD SERVICES PROGRAM...           4,038  ..............           4,179  ..............
    COOPERATIVE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT............           1,750  ..............           2,250  ..............
    BASIN STUDIES...............................           5,200  ..............           5,200  ..............
    DROUGHT RESPONSE & COMPREHENSIVE DROUGHT               3,250  ..............           4,000  ..............
     PLANS......................................
    TITLE XVI WATER RECLAMATION & REUSE PROGRAM.          21,500  ..............          34,406  ..............
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, REMAINING ITEMS.................         180,205         151,469         467,281         153,294
                                                 ===============================================================
UNDERFINANCING..................................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............
                                                 ---------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL.....................................         510,808         449,209         699,340         451,009
                                                 ===============================================================
      GRAND TOTAL, WATER AND RELATED RESOURCES..  ..............         960,017  ..............       1,150,349
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Indian Water Settlements.--The Committee notes that funding 
is recommended for Indian water rights settlements, which meet 
trust and treaty obligations to tribes and resolve significant 
tribal water-related claims against the Federal government. In 
December 2016, Congress authorized a number of important Indian 
water settlements as part of the WIIN Act, including the 
Blackfeet Water Rights Settlement Act. To meet the Blackfeet 
settlement's enforcement date of January 21, 2025, significant 
additional funding will be required after fiscal year 2018. The 
Committee therefore encourages Reclamation to budget 
accordingly for Indian water rights settlements in its budget 
request for fiscal year 2019.
    San Joaquin River Restoration Program.--The Committee is 
deeply concerned by the lack of tangible progress in river 
channel reconstruction despite Federal expenditures of 
$172,000,000 through September 30, 2016, and an anticipated 
additional $390,000,000 to $700,000,000 necessary to complete 
the program. The Committee directs Reclamation to work with the 
settling parties and the Exchange Contractors to develop a plan 
to successfully implement the program, which shall identify 
funding sources to match projected program expenditures; ensure 
that the program is on track to achieve goals that are 
technically, scientifically, and financially achievable; 
reevaluate the program's 2025 reopener date, given extensive 
delays in river project implementation; and improve the 
program's relationship with third parties, while working within 
projected budgets and timelines. The Committee directs 
Reclamation to achieve substantial progress toward developing 
the plan by November 15, 2017, and to brief the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on the progress 
achieved by that date.
    Salton Sea.--Pursuant to recent agreements between the 
Department of the Interior and the State of California, the 
Committee encourages the Department to prioritize 
implementation of the Salton Sea Memorandum of Understanding 
[MOU]. The Committee urges the Department to include specific 
funding requests for implementation of the MOU in future budget 
submissions and directs the Department to provide semiannual 
briefings to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress regarding Federal efforts to implement the MOU and 
other Salton Sea mitigation efforts.
    Scoggins Dam, Tualatin Project, Oregon.--The Committee 
supports the administration's budget request for 
preconstruction activities at Scoggins Dam under the Safety of 
Dams program. Consistent with the Tualatin Project Water Supply 
Feasibility Study authorized in Public Law 108-137 and 
statutory authority granted by Public Law 114-113 allowing for 
additional benefits to be conducted concurrently with dam 
safety improvements, the Committee directs Reclamation to 
evaluate alternatives, including new or supplementary works, 
provided that safety remains the paramount consideration, to 
address dam safety modifications and increased storage 
capacity. Considering the high risk associated with Scoggins 
Dam, the Committee urges Reclamation to work with local 
stakeholders and repayment contractors to prioritize this joint 
project including feasibility and environmental review of the 
preferred alternative in fiscal year 2018. The Committee 
understands that a replacement structure downstream could 
significantly reduce project costs for both the Federal 
Government and local stakeholders. Reclamation may accept 
contributed funds from non-Federal contractors to expedite 
completion of any level of review.
    Rural Water Projects.--Voluntary funding in excess of 
legally required cost shares for rural water projects is 
acceptable but shall not be used by Reclamation as a criterion 
for allocating additional funding recommended by the Committee 
or for budgeting in future years.
    WaterSMART Program.--The Committee encourages Reclamation 
to prioritize eligible water conservation projects that will 
provide water supplies to meet the needs of threatened and 
endangered species.
    Research and Development: Desalination and Water 
Purification Program.--Of the funding recommended for this 
program, $6,000,000 shall be for desalination projects as 
authorized in section 4009(a) of Public Law 114-322.
    Research and Development, Science and Technology Program.--
The Committee is aware that the Reclamation Science and 
Technology Office has been investing in efforts under the Open 
Water Data Initiative to integrate currently fragmented water 
supply data from several Federal agencies into a connected, 
national water data framework. Furthermore, the Committee 
understands that the Science and Technology Office has a future 
goal to develop web-based decision support tools. The Committee 
urges Reclamation to expedite the development and testing of a 
web-based Water Supply Decision Support System that will help 
Federal, State, municipal, Tribal and private water managers 
and users make better water-use decisions to support water 
conservation and drought resilience in the western States. Such 
a system will allow a diverse group of water managers and users 
to better leverage the Federal Government's investment in 
producing water supply data on river levels, snow pack, 
weather, and climate.
    WaterSMART Program: Title XVI Water Reclamation & Reuse 
Program.--Of the funding recommended for this program, 
$10,000,000 shall be for water recycling and reuse projects as 
authorized in section 4009(c) of Public Law 114-322.
    Additional Funding for Water and Related Resources Work.--
The Committee recommendation includes an additional 
$190,332,000 above the budget request for Water and Related 
Resources studies, projects, and activities. Priority in 
allocating these funds should be given to advance and complete 
ongoing work; improve water supply reliability; improve water 
deliveries; enhance national, regional, or local economic 
development; promote job growth; advance Tribal and nontribal 
water settlement studies and activities; or address critical 
backlog maintenance and rehabilitation activities. Funding 
recommended under the heading Additional Funding for Ongoing 
Work may be utilized for ongoing work, including pre-
construction activities, on projects which provide new or 
existing water supplies through additional infrastructure. 
Reclamation shall give priority in allocating funds to ongoing 
work on authorized projects for which environmental compliance 
has been completed. Reclamation is encouraged to allocate 
additional funding for aquifer recharging efforts to address 
the ongoing backlog of related projects. Of the funds 
recommended under the heading ``Water Conservation and 
Delivery'', $5,000,000 is allocated to fund Colorado River 
water conservation, including the Pilot System Conservation 
Program as authorized in section 206 of Energy and Water 
Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015. Of 
the additional funding recommended under the heading ``Water 
Conservation and Delivery'', $67,000,000 shall be for water 
storage projects as authorized in section 4007 of Public Law 
114-322. Of the additional funding recommended under the 
heading ``Environmental Restoration or Compliance'', 
$15,000,000 shall be for activities authorized under sections 
4001 and 4010 of Public Law 114-322 or as set forth in Federal-
State plans for restoring threatened and endangered fish 
species affected by the operation of Reclamation's water 
projects.
    The Committee is concerned that Reclamation's criteria for 
allocating funding have not adequately accounted for projects 
that would directly benefit military base operations and 
national security facilities in the past. The Committee directs 
the Department of the Interior to consult with the Department 
of Defense to develop a plan to adequately allocate Water and 
Related Resources funding that directly benefits military base 
operations and national security facilities.
    Reclamation is encouraged to prioritize funding to help 
irrigation districts with junior water rights to plan and 
develop water conservation plans to comply with ESA 
requirements.
    Buried Metallic Water Pipe.--Reclamation shall continue 
following its temporary design guidance.

                CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT RESTORATION FUND

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $55,606,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      41,376,000
Committee recommendation................................      41,376,000

    The Committee recommends $41,376,000 for the Central Valley 
Project Restoration Fund, the same as the budget request. This 
appropriation is fully offset by a scorekeeping adjustment from 
revenues.
    The Central Valley Project Restoration Fund was authorized 
in the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, title 34 of 
Public Law 102-575. This fund uses revenues from payments by 
project beneficiaries and donations for habitat restoration, 
improvement and acquisition, and other fish and wildlife 
restoration activities in the Central Valley project area of 
California. Payments from project beneficiaries include several 
required by the act (Friant Division surcharges, higher charges 
on water transferred to non-Central Valley Project users, and 
tiered water prices) and, to the extent required in 
appropriations acts, additional annual mitigation and 
restoration payments.

                    CALIFORNIA BAY-DELTA RESTORATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $36,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      37,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      37,000,000

    The Committee recommends $37,000,000 for California Bay-
Delta Restoration, the same as the budget request.
    This account funds activities that are consistent with the 
CALFED Bay-Delta Program, a collaborative effort involving 18 
State and Federal agencies and representatives of California's 
urban, agricultural, and environmental communities. The goals 
of the program are to improve fish and wildlife habitat, water 
supply reliability, and water quality in the San Francisco Bay-
San Joaquin River Delta, the principle hub of California's 
water distribution system.

                       POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $59,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      59,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      59,000,000

    The Committee recommends $59,000,000 for Policy and 
Administration, the same as the budget request.
    This account funds the executive direction and management 
of all Reclamation activities, as performed by the 
Commissioner's offices in Washington, DC; Denver, Colorado; and 
five regional offices. The Denver office and regional offices 
charge individual projects or activities for direct beneficial 
services and related administrative and technical costs. These 
charges are covered under other appropriations.

             GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

    Section 201. The bill includes language concerning 
reprogramming.
    Section 202. The bill includes language concerning the San 
Luis Unit.
    Section 203. The bill includes language concerning the 
Reclamation States Emerging Drought Relief Act of 1991.
    Section 204. The bill includes language concerning 
industrial hemp.

                               TITLE III

                          DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

                       Overview of Recommendation

    The Committee recommends $31,967,986,000 for the Department 
of Energy, an increase of $3,587,029,000 above the budget 
request. The recommendation includes recessions of $510,360,000 
of unobligated prior year balances, resulting in a net 
appropriation of $31,457,626,000.
    The Committee recommendation sets priorities by supporting 
the Office of Science and ARPA-E, leading the world in 
scientific computing, addressing the Federal Government's 
responsibility for environmental cleanup and disposal of used 
nuclear fuel, keeping large construction projects on time and 
on budget, effectively maintaining our nuclear weapons 
stockpile, and supporting our nuclear Navy.

                              Introduction

    The mission of the Department of Energy [Department] is to 
ensure America's security and prosperity by addressing its 
energy, environmental, and nuclear challenges through 
transformative science and technology solutions. To accomplish 
this mission, the Secretary of Energy [Secretary] relies on a 
world-class network of national laboratories, private industry, 
universities, States, and Federal agencies, which allows our 
brightest minds to solve our Nation's most important 
challenges.
    The Committee's recommendation for the Department includes 
funding in both defense and non-defense budget categories. 
Defense funding is recommended for atomic energy defense 
activities, including the National Nuclear Security 
Administration, which manages our Nation's stockpile of nuclear 
weapons, prevents proliferation of dangerous nuclear materials, 
and supports the Navy's nuclear fleet; defense environmental 
cleanup to remediate the former nuclear weapons complex; and 
safeguards and security for Idaho National Laboratory. Non-
defense funding is recommended for the Department's energy 
research and development programs (including nuclear, fossil, 
and renewable energy, energy efficiency, grid modernization and 
resiliency, and the Office of Science), power marketing 
administrations, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and 
administrative expenses.

                        Reprogramming Guidelines

    The Committee's recommendation includes control points to 
ensure that the Secretary spends taxpayer funds in accordance 
with congressional direction. The Committee's recommendation 
also includes reprogramming guidelines to allow the Secretary 
to request permission from the Committee for certain 
expenditures, as defined below, which would not otherwise be 
permissible. The Secretary's execution of appropriated funds 
shall be fully consistent with the direction provided under 
this heading and in section 301 of the bill, unless the 
Committee includes separate guidelines for specific actions in 
the bill or report.
    Prior to obligating any funds for an action defined below 
as a reprogramming, the Secretary shall notify and obtain 
approval of the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress. The Secretary shall submit a detailed reprogramming 
request in accordance with section 301 of the bill, which 
shall, at a minimum, justify the deviation from prior 
congressional direction and describe the proposed funding 
adjustments with specificity. The Secretary shall not, pending 
approval from the Committee, obligate any funds for the action 
described in the reprogramming proposal.
    The Secretary is also directed to inform the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress promptly and fully 
when a change in program execution and funding is required 
during the fiscal year.
    Definition.--A reprogramming includes:
  --the reallocation of funds from one activity to another 
        within an appropriation;
  --any significant departure from a program, project, 
        activity, or organization described in the agency's 
        budget justification as presented to and approved by 
        Congress;
  --for construction projects, the reallocation of funds from 
        one construction project identified in the agency's 
        budget justification to another project or a 
        significant change in the scope of an approved project;
  --adoption of any reorganization proposal which includes 
        moving prior appropriations between appropriations 
        accounts; and
  --any reallocation of new or prior year budget authority, or 
        prior year deobligations.

                        Crosscutting Initiatives

    The recommendation supports several crosscutting 
initiatives funded in prior years that reach outside of 
individual program offices to draw on the diverse disciplines 
within the agency as a whole. These initiatives, which address 
the Energy-Water Nexus; grid modernization; subsurface science, 
technology and engineering research, development, and 
deployment; cybersecurity; and advanced materials, have allowed 
for a more comprehensive review of complex issues.
    Grid Modernization.--The Department is directed to continue 
to support ongoing work between the national laboratories, 
industry, and universities to improve grid reliability and 
resiliency. Given that much of the Nation's grid is privately 
owned, there are significant challenges to modernizing the 
grid, which make it difficult to develop, test, and deploy new 
technologies. To address these challenges, Congress has 
provided funding for the Grid Modernization Initiative [GMI] 
over the past 2 fiscal years. The budget request does not 
address the GMI comprehensively even though in January 2016, 
the Department announced up to $220,000,000 for the GMI over 3 
years, subject to appropriations from Congress. Within the GMI, 
the Committee supports the Grid Modernization Laboratory 
Consortium's [GMLC] leadership of a comprehensive, 
multidisciplinary research and development program managed 
through a consortium of the national laboratories, leveraging 
national laboratory assets and partnering with non-Federal 
entities. The Committee is pleased that the Department has 
recently undertaken peer review processes to evaluate the 
GMLC's progress. The Committee supports the strategic goals of 
the Grid Modernization Multi-Year Program Plan [MYPP], which 
reflects a 5-year integrated strategy across the Department to 
guide investment and leverage the expertise of our national 
laboratories, while working with industry and States. The 
Committee directs the Department to continue implementation of 
the MYPP, as in previous years.
    The Committee recognizes the opportunities and challenges 
associated with grid modernization, as well as the gaps in our 
current understanding not addressed by existing studies, and 
accordingly directs the National Academies of Sciences, 
Engineering, and Medicine to conduct an evaluation of the 
expected medium- and long-term evolution of the grid. This 
evaluation shall focus on developments that include the 
emergence of new technologies, planning and operating 
techniques, grid architecture, and business models. This study 
will provide critical insight into the future of the grid, 
particularly with respect to the distribution network and its 
interface with the rest of the grid, and will inform decisions 
regarding strategic investment of Federal funds and other 
policies, including ensuring proper steps are taken to address 
cybersecurity.
    Subsurface Crosscut.--The Committee supports the ongoing 
Subsurface Technology and Engineering Research [SubTER] 
Initiative, which is focused on revolutionizing sustainable 
subsurface energy production and storage through 
transformational improvements in the ability to access, 
characterize, predict, and adaptively manipulate subsurface 
fracture and flow processes. SubTER aims to double reservoir 
recovery, decrease the environmental footprint, and enhance 
energy security and public safety. The Committee supports the 
SubTER program's approach to increasing domestic supply of oil, 
gas, and geothermal energy resources by manipulating the 
permeability of subsurface rock formations to injection fluids. 
To validate methods which enhance oil and gas recovery from 
fracking wells, the Committee encourages the Department to 
conduct pilot field tests of promising technologies with 
university and industry partners to reduce permeability and 
control the flow of fluids in the subsurface with targets of 
blocking highly permeable pathways that reduce sweep efficiency 
in porous rock and plugging fractures in shales.
    Energy-Water Nexus.--The Committee recognizes water and 
energy are critical resources that are reciprocally linked. The 
Energy-Water Nexus crosscut consists of a collaboration of 
agencies, national laboratories, State and local governments, 
utilities, industry, and the science community working 
collectively to address energy and water resource challenges, 
specifically as they relate to energy security and energy 
sector water needs.
    Advanced Materials.--The Committee supports the Department-
wide crosscut on advanced materials, which focuses on 
lightweight materials and composites and corrosion and 
materials under extremes. The Committee understands in previous 
years, other program offices independently had standalone 
existing materials programs, and continues to support formal 
coordination across offices through the Materials Working 
Group. This is an unprecedented opportunity to impact the 
materials development cycle from scientific discovery to 
technological innovation and deployment.
    Cybersecurity Crosscut.--Cybersecurity activities within 
the Department cover a broad scope ranging from the protection 
of Department assets against cybersecurity threats to improving 
cybersecurity in the electric power and oil and natural gas 
sectors to other areas in the national security portfolio. As 
cybersecurity threats become more complex, and the Department 
increases its focus on cybersecurity research and development, 
it is vital that there be clear crosscutting objectives and 
coordination across the Department. The budget proposes to 
develop a Multi-Year Program Plan for the Energy Sector, which 
will complement the energy sector-developed Roadmap to Achieve 
Energy Delivery Systems Cybersecurity. While that effort is 
important, it is not sufficient. The Committee directs the 
Department to develop a plan that integrates all of the 
Department's cybersecurity investments, and brief the 
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress on that 
plan before delivery of the fiscal year 2019 budget request.
    Arctic Energy Office.--The Committee supports the promotion 
of research, development, and deployment of electric power 
technology that is cost-effective and well-suited to meet the 
needs of rural and remote regions of the United States, 
especially where permafrost is present or located nearby. In 
addition, the Committee further supports research, development 
and deployment in such regions of enhanced oil recovery 
technology, including heavy oil recovery, reinjection of 
carbon, and extended reach drilling technologies; gas-to-
liquids technology and liquefied natural gas, including 
associated transportation systems; small hydroelectric 
facilities, river turbines, and tidal power; natural gas 
hydrates, coal bed methane, and shallow bed natural gas; and 
alternative energy, including wind, geothermal, and fuel cells. 
The Department is encouraged to support a renewed focus on the 
Arctic region, and as a cross-cutting activity, use the Arctic 
Energy Office as a centralized area to support the use of 
energy resources, but also innovative activities, including 
microgrids and integrated energy systems.
    Regional Initiatives.--The Committee urges the Department 
to utilize investments through existing regional capabilities 
that include industry, universities, and State and regional 
economic development assets. The Committee further encourages 
the national laboratories to expand their geographic outreach 
through people and access to specialized equipment and user 
facilities in order to contribute to the success of these 
regional initiatives.

                        COMMONLY RECYCLED PAPER

    The Secretary shall not expend funds for projects that 
knowingly use as a feedstock commonly recycled paper that is 
segregated from municipal solid waste or collected as part of a 
collection system that commingles commonly recycled paper with 
other solid waste at any point from the time of collection 
through materials recovery.

                             FIVE-YEAR PLAN

    The Secretary is required by 42 U.S.C. 7279a, enacted by 
the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012, to include in the 
Department's annual budget request proposed funding levels for 
the request year and 4 subsequent years, at a level of detail 
commensurate with the current budget justification documents. 
This requirement is to ensure that the Secretary is proposing a 
current budget that takes into account realistic budget 
constraints in future years, and that Congress has full 
visibility into the future implications of current budget 
decisions across the Department's energy programs.
    The Committee directs the Secretary to submit a report, not 
later than September 30, 2018, to the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress, on a plan to comply 
with 42 U.S.C. 7279a. Failure to provide this report may result 
in more directive measures to ensure the Secretary complies 
with the law and engages in practices that safeguard taxpayer 
dollars.

                            ENERGY PROGRAMS

                 Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $2,090,200,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     636,149,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,936,988,000

    The Committee recommends $1,936,988,000 for Energy 
Efficiency and Renewable Energy [EERE], an increase of 
$1,300,839,000 above the budget request. Within available 
funds, the Committee recommends $153,500,000 for program 
direction.
    The Committee recognizes the importance of the development 
and deployment of energy efficiency and renewable energy 
technologies, which are critical to expanding U.S. energy 
security and global leadership. The Committee directs that 
within available funding, the Department shall support the 
reduction of costs for consumers, while also improving grid 
reliability.
    Early-Stage Research and Development.--The President's 
budget request proposes a shift away from later stage research 
and development activities to refocus the Department on an 
early-stage research and development mission. The Committee 
believes that such an approach will not successfully integrate 
the results of early-stage research and development into the 
U.S. energy system and thus will not adequately deliver 
innovative energy technologies, practices, and information to 
American consumers and companies. Notably, this is the case 
with complex systems and structures such as America's homes, 
offices and other buildings. The Committee provides funding to 
support a comprehensive and real-world strategy that includes 
medium- and later-stage research and development; deployment 
and demonstration activities; and other approaches that are 
designed to utilize the most effective means to increase 
buildings' energy efficiency in order to promote their 
affordability, sustainability, resilience, and productivity.
    Workforce Development.--The development of a skilled 
workforce is critical to the successful deployment and long-
term sustainability of energy efficient and renewable energy 
technologies. The Committee encourages funding within EERE 
programs to be allocated to training and workforce development 
programs that assist and support workers in trades and 
activities required for the continued growth of the U.S. energy 
efficiency and clean energy sectors. Furthermore, the Committee 
encourages the Department to work with 2-year, public 
community, and technical colleges for job training programs 
that lead to an industry-recognized credential in the energy 
workforce.
    Energy Star.--In 2009, the Department and the Environmental 
Protection Agency [EPA] signed a Memorandum of Understanding 
[MOU] related to the Energy Star Program, which shifted some 
functions related to home appliance products from the 
Department to the EPA. The Department shall work with the EPA 
to review the 2009 MOU and report to the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress within 90 days after 
enactment of this Act on whether the expected efficiencies for 
home appliance products have been achieved.
    Sustainable Transportation Initiative.--The Committee 
encourages the Department to continue the Sustainable 
Transportation (Mobility) Initiative, including the Co-Optima 
and SMART Mobility Initiatives. These investments are critical 
to expanding U.S. energy security. Therefore, the Committee 
supports continued funding for research that allows the U.S. to 
continue its leadership in advancing state-of-the-art 
transportation infrastructure, which is vital to economic 
development.

                          VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee recommends $277,988,000 for Vehicle 
Technologies.
    Within this amount, the Committee recommends not less than 
$140,000,000 for Electric Drive Technologies Research and 
Development, $42,988,000 for Advanced Combustion Engine 
Research and Development, $25,000,000 for Materials Technology, 
and $16,000,000 for Vehicle Systems.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends not less 
than $10,000,000 for continued funding of section 131 of the 
2007 Energy Independence and Security Act for transportation 
electrification. The Committee encourages the Department, when 
making grants through the Vehicle Technologies Program, to 
expand opportunities for the demonstration of zero-emissions 
technologies that will be of practical use in areas of extreme 
non-attainment with national ambient air quality standards. The 
Committee also supports early stage research to lower the cost 
of batteries for electric vehicles through battery processing 
science, materials research, and modeling and simulation of 
battery performance, including research on extreme fast and 
wireless charging, and using high performance computing for 
electric motor multi-physics discovery for electric drive 
technologies.
    The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for the SuperTruck II 
program to further improve the efficiency of heavy-duty class 8 
long- and regional-haul vehicles and continue support of the 
fiscal year 2016 SuperTruck II awards. The Department is 
directed to make five awards using the multi-year allocation 
process that was used successfully by the SuperTruck I program.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$34,000,000 for Outreach, Deployment, and Analysis to support 
the Clean Cities Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Deployment 
Program. Within this amount, $28,000,000 is provided for 
deployment through the Clean Cities Program, of which not less 
than $24,000,000 shall be for funding opportunity awards to 
Clean Cities Coalitions and Alternative Fuel Vehicle Community 
Partner projects. The Department is encouraged to ensure 
balance in the award of funds to achieve varied aims in 
fostering broader adoption of clean vehicles and installation 
of supporting infrastructure. The Committee further encourages 
the Department to prioritize projects in States where the 
transportation sector is responsible for a higher percentage of 
the State's total energy consumption and is their largest 
source of greenhouse gases.
    The Committee supports the EcoCAR 3 competition, which 
provides hands-on, real-world experience to demonstrate a 
variety of advanced technologies and designs, and supports 
development of a workforce trained in advanced vehicles. The 
Committee recommends $2,500,000 for the third year of a 4-year 
collegiate engineering competition, EcoCAR 3.
    The Committee recognizes that the commercial off-road 
vehicle sector, including industrial, mining, and farm 
equipment, consumes over 2 Quads of energy per year and directs 
the Department to continue activities to reduce the energy 
consumption of commercial off-road vehicles. The Committee 
recommends $5,000,000 to continue improving the energy 
efficiency of fluid power systems for commercial off-road 
vehicles.
    The Committee encourages the Department to support research 
on natural gas storage, natural gas engines, and fueling 
infrastructure optimization. The Committee is also supportive 
of efforts to address technical barriers to the increased use 
of natural gas vehicles, including the development of novel 
compression and liquefaction technologies, advanced materials, 
and improvements in processes for conditioning, storing, and 
dispensing natural gas.

                         BIOENERGY TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee recommends $190,000,000 for Bioenergy 
Technologies.
    Within available funds, the Committee directs the Secretary 
to provide a total of $30,000,000 for algal biofuels, and 
expects the Department to sustain the investment in development 
of algal biofuels. When awarding grants and cooperative 
agreements for algal biofuels research and development, not 
less than 50 percent of the dollar value of awards shall be for 
university- or industry-led consortia. The Committee further 
recommends $20,000,000 for Feedstock Supply and Logistics, 
$50,000,000 for Demonstration and Market Transformation, and 
$5,000,000 for Strategic Analysis and Cross-cutting 
Sustainability.
    The Committee further recommends $85,000,000 for Conversion 
Technologies. Within this amount, $20,000,000 is recommended to 
continue activities of the Agile Biology Foundry intended to 
achieve substantial improvements in conversion efficiencies and 
the scale-up of biological processes with lower development 
costs and lead times.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends $5,000,000 
within Conversion Technologies to continue the research, 
biopower program, which makes full and innovative use of 
biomass, municipally-derived biosolids, and municipal solid 
waste.
    The Committee recognizes that biomethane or anaerobic 
digesters can provide important solutions to meet renewable 
energy goals, as well as address environmental and economic 
challenges and divert organic waste from landfills. Research, 
development, and demonstration activities are needed to help 
lower upfront development costs and promote smaller-scale, 
community digesters. Within available funds for Conversion 
Technologies, the Committee recommends $5,000,000 to improve 
the efficiency of community and smaller digesters that accept 
both farm and food wastes.
    The Committee continues to support the Secretary's 
participation in the Farm to Fly 2 Initiative with the Federal 
Aviation Administration's Center of Excellence for Alternative 
Jet Fuels and the Environment. The Committee reiterates to the 
Federal entities involved that this is a cost-sharing research 
partnership among academia, industry, and the Federal 
Government, and urges full collaboration between the 
Departments of Energy and Agriculture and other Federal 
agencies in the Initiative.
    The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and 
Medicine has recognized that bioenergy with carbon capture 
sequestration [BECCS] has technical potential to provide a 
significant portion of the world's energy supply by the end of 
the century. If commercialized further, BECCS could be a 
baseload electricity resource with a net-negative carbon 
emission profile. The Committee encourages the Bioenergy 
Technologies Office to continue its collaboration with the 
Office of Fossil Energy on BECCS research, as well as research 
to advance net carbon-negative transportation fuels.

                  HYDROGEN AND FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee recommends $85,000,000 for Hydrogen and Fuel 
Cell Technologies.
    The Committee recognizes the progress of the program and 
continues to support stationary, vehicle, motive, and portable 
power applications. Within the amounts recommended, $27,000,000 
is for Fuel Cell Research and Development, $36,000,000 is for 
Hydrogen Research and Development and $1,000,000 is for systems 
analysis activities. The Committee recommends $14,000,000 for 
Technology Acceleration activities, including $3,000,000 for 
manufacturing research and development, and $7,000,000 for 
industry-led efforts to demonstrate a hydrogen-focused 
integrated renewable energy production, storage, and 
transportation fuel distribution/retailing system. The 
Committee further recommends $7,000,000 for Safety, Codes, and 
Standards.
    The Committee encourages the Secretary to work with the 
Secretary of Transportation and industry on coordinating 
efforts to deploy hydrogen fueling infrastructure. The 
Department is further encouraged to identify competitive 
opportunities to help develop affordable hydrogen 
infrastructure components. The Department is directed to use 
funds to improve hydrogen measurement devices for retail 
fueling stations and work to reduce costs for hydrogen 
compressors and carbon fiber tanks.

                              SOLAR ENERGY

    The Committee recommends $167,500,000 for Solar Energy.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$48,000,000 for Concentrating Solar Power research, 
development, and demonstration of technologies that reduce 
overall system costs, better integrate subsystem components, 
develop higher-temperature receivers, and improve the design of 
solar collection and thermal energy storage. Within this amount 
$12,000,000 is recommended for competitively selected projects 
focused on advanced thermal desalination techniques.
    The Committee recommends $48,000,000 for Photovoltaic 
Research and Development. Research programs for high efficiency 
thin-film photovoltaics and processes are encouraged to include 
cooperation between industry and academia, and to include 
advanced optical characterization that enables development of 
strong correlations between materials and cell optical 
properties, and the photovoltaic power performance of the 
working solar cells.
    Further, the Committee recommends $45,000,000 for Systems 
Integration, $10,500,000 for Balance of System Soft Cost 
Reduction, and $16,000,000 for Innovations in Manufacturing 
Competitiveness.
    The Committee recognizes that solar energy is one of the 
fastest growing industries in the United States, and employs 
over 260,000 workers today. Within available funds, the 
Committee recommends $1,000,000 for the Secretary's 
contribution to the joint Solar Ready Vets program within the 
Department of Defense as a way to train America's veterans to 
fill this growing skill need.

                              WIND ENERGY

    The Committee recommends $72,500,000 for Wind Energy.
    The Committee supports research using high-performance 
computing, modeling and simulation--including the Atmosphere to 
Electrons initiative program--and reliability and grid 
integration efforts. Further, the Department is directed to 
give priority to stewarding the assets and optimizing the 
operations of the Department-owned wind research and testing 
facilities and provides not less than $30,000,000 for the 
National Wind Technology Center.
    The Committee notes that, despite the rapid growth of the 
wind power industry, the distributed wind segment has remained 
limited in its applications in the United States. The Committee 
encourages the Department to prioritize work on distributed 
wind technologies that reduce costs and improve performance, 
and to work with industry to invest in the development and 
demonstration of technologies and practices that advance 
distributed wind. Within available funds, the Committee 
recommends not less than $2,500,000 for distributed wind.
    The Committee directs the Department to support the 
advancement of innovative technologies for offshore wind 
development, including freshwater, deepwater, shallow water, 
and transitional depth installations. The Committee directs the 
Department to continue to support the previously awarded 
innovative Offshore Wind Advanced Technology Demonstration 
Projects, funded by previous appropriations bills, and further 
supports efforts to optimize their design, construction 
methods, testing plans, and economic value proposition. The 
Committee expects project development and other funds for the 
offshore wind demonstration projects to be allocated equitably 
between the approved projects. The Committee further directs 
the Department to support the deployment and testing of scale 
floating wind turbines designed to reduce energy costs.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends not less 
than $15,000,000 for the Department to prioritize early stage 
research on materials and manufacturing methods and advanced 
components that will enable accessing high-quality wind 
resources, on development that will enable these technologies 
to compete in the marketplace without the need for subsidies, 
and on activities that will accelerate fundamental offshore-
specific research and development, such as those that target 
technology and deployment challenges unique to U.S. waters.

                              WATER POWER

    The Committee recommends $82,000,000 for Water Power.
    Hydropower Technologies.--Within available funds, the 
Committee recommends $25,000,000 for conventional hydropower 
and pumped storage activities, including up to $6,600,000 for 
the purposes of section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. 
Within available funds, $10,000,000 is recommended for a 
competitive funding opportunity for multiple awardees to test 
the commercial viability of new use cases for pumped storage 
hydropower at locations to enhance grid reliability and manage 
variable generation.
    Marine and Hydrokinetic Technology Research, Development, 
and Deployment.--The Committee recommends $57,000,000 for 
marine and hydrokinetic technology research, development, and 
deployment activities, including research into mitigation of 
marine ecosystem impacts of these technologies.
    Within available funds, not less than $5,000,000 and not 
more than $10,000,000 is recommended to continue construction 
of the previously awarded open-water wave energy test facility. 
The Committee is concerned that the Secretary is not utilizing 
a 20 percent cost share, as previously directed. Given the 
importance of this facility in testing and advancing early-
stage marine and hydrokinetic technologies and the tremendous 
potential these technologies have to provide long-term clean 
energy, the Department is again directed to ensure that the 
cooperative agreement reflects the appropriate cost share of 20 
percent.
    Within available funds, the Department is directed to 
continue competitive solicitations to increase energy capture, 
reliability, and survivability at lower costs for a balanced 
portfolio of wave and current (ocean, river, tidal) energy 
conversion systems and components. Therefore, the Committee 
recommends $30,000,000 for industry and university led basic 
and applied research, development, and validation projects 
encompassing a pipeline of higher and lower technology 
readiness levels. The funds shall be used for new awards or to 
bring existing test and validation awards toward completion. 
Given the early stage nature of marine energy technologies, the 
Committee encourages the Department to consider reducing and/or 
waiving cost share requirements for small businesses.
    The Committee recommends not less than $4,000,000 to 
support collaborations between the previously designated 
university-based Marine Renewable Energy Centers and the 
national laboratories, including personnel exchanges, to 
support industry by conducting research, development and 
deployment of marine energy components and systems. In 
addition, the Department is directed to continue its 
coordination with the U.S. Navy on marine energy technology 
development for national security applications at the Wave 
Energy Test Site and other locations.
    Within available funds, the Department is directed to 
prioritize the necessary infrastructure upgrades at marine 
industry testing sites operated by the national laboratories or 
the National Marine Renewable Energy Centers. Within available 
funds, not less than $1,000,000 is provided for these projects 
in fiscal year 2018.
    The Committee encourages close coordination between the 
Department and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the 
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, other relevant agencies and 
industry to reduce the amount of time to permit marine energy 
test and validation projects.

                        GEOTHERMAL TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee recommends $67,500,000 for Geothermal 
Technologies.
    Within available funds, $43,000,000 shall be for Enhanced 
Geothermal Systems, $14,000,000 shall be for Hydrothermal, 
$8,000,000 for Low-Temperature and Coproduced Resources, and 
$2,500,000 for Systems Analysis.
    To facilitate necessary technology development and expand 
understanding of subsurface dynamics, the Committee recommends 
$30,000,000 for the continuation of activities of the Frontier 
Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy [FORGE], with 
activities to include ongoing novel subsurface 
characterization, full-scale well drilling, and technology 
research and development to accelerate the commercial pathway 
to large-scale enhanced geothermal systems power generation.
    The Committee recognizes that enhanced geothermal systems 
are versatile, inherently modular, and scalable from 
residential utilization to district heating opportunities and 
large power parks that can provide base-load capacity. The 
Committee encourages the Department to support enhanced 
geothermal system applications for industrial and residential 
uses.
    The Committee directs the Department to continue its 
efforts to identify prospective geothermal resources in areas 
with no obvious surface expressions.

                         ADVANCED MANUFACTURING

    The Committee recommends $252,000,000 for Advanced 
Manufacturing.
    The Committee recommends $80,500,000 for the Advanced 
Manufacturing Research and Development Projects, $145,000,000 
for Advanced Manufacturing Research and Development Facilities, 
and $26,500,000 for Industrial Technical Assistance.
    Within available funds for Advanced Manufacturing Research 
and Development Facilities, the Committee recommends 
$20,000,000 for the Manufacturing Demonstration Facility [MDF], 
which supports the development of additive manufacturing 
processes, low-cost carbon fiber, and other manufacturing 
technologies to reduce the energy intensity and life-cycle 
energy consumption of domestic manufactured products, thereby 
increasing the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing 
industries. The Committee notes the ongoing emphasis on 
assisting small- and medium-sized businesses to overcome the 
risks and challenges of investing in specialized, high-
technology equipment at the MDF. The Department is directed to 
continue this emphasis in the coming year.
    The Committee supports the development of additive 
manufacturing involving nanocellulose feedstock materials made 
from forest products, and encourages the Department to leverage 
expertise and capabilities for large scale additive 
manufacturing.
    The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for the second year of 
research and development efforts to lower the cost and energy 
intensity of technologies to provide clean, safe water through 
the Energy-Water Desalination Hub.
    The Committee recommends $70,000,000 to support five Clean 
Energy Manufacturing Institutes [CEMIs], including $14,000,000 
each for the Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation 
Institute, the Smart Manufacturing Innovation Institute, the 
Reducing Embodied-energy and Decreasing Emissions [REMADE] 
Institute, and the Rapid Advancement in Process Intensification 
Deployment [RAPID] Institute, and a CEMI selection to be 
announced. The Committee notes the PowerAmerica Next Generation 
Power Electronics Manufacturing Innovation Institute has 
received $70,000,000 over the past 5 years to stand up a 
sustainable effort, and encourages the Department to work with 
one or more national laboratories and universities to build a 
sustainable plan. The Committee is pleased with the ongoing 
work of the innovative advanced manufacturing opportunities 
through the CEMIs, and directs the Department to continue 
funding and support for the institutes.
    The Committee recommends $25,000,000 to continue for the 
Critical Materials Hub. The Committee supports the Hub's 
continued focus on technologies that will enable domestic 
manufacturers to make better use of the critical materials to 
which they have access, as well as to reduce or eliminate the 
need for materials that are subject to supply disruptions. The 
Committee notes that the Hub has focused on high-priority 
problems and has developed strong milestones. The Committee 
supports the Hub's goal of developing at least one technology 
adopted by U.S. companies within each of its three focus areas: 
diversifying and expanding production; reducing wastes; and 
developing substitutes.
    The Committee recognizes the important role additive 
manufacturing can play in helping to advance the deployment of 
clean energy technologies. The Committee directs the Department 
to further foster the partnership between the national 
laboratories, universities, and industry to use thermoplastics 
composites and 3-D printing for renewable energy to overcome 
challenges to the development and implementation of innovative 
offshore wind technologies.
    Within available funds for the Industrial Technical 
Assistance program, the Committee recommends $12,000,000 to 
provide ongoing support for the Combined Heat and Power [CHP] 
Technical Assistance Partnerships [TAPs] and related CHP 
Technical Partnership activities at the Department, including 
$5,000,000 for the TAPs and $7,000,000 for related CHP 
activities. The Committee recognizes the great potential for 
energy savings in municipal, industrial, and agricultural 
wastewater treatment systems and encourages the Secretary to 
expand on the technical assistance provided by the Industrial 
Assessment Centers to address these needs by equipping the 
directors of the Industrial Assessment Centers with the 
training and tools necessary to provide technical assistance on 
energy savings to those facilities. Within the funds provided 
for the Industrial Assessment Centers, the Committee recommends 
not less than $1,500,000 for wastewater treatment technical 
assistance. The Committee encourages the Department to 
prioritize research, development, and demonstration of district 
energy systems, and work to accelerate greater deployment of 
district energy systems in communities, campuses, industries, 
and cities nationwide by supporting adaptive regional and local 
technology, and market opportunities.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$10,000,000 for district heating. The Committee further directs 
the Secretary to collaborate with industry to submit a report 
to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress 
no later than 90 days after enactment that assesses the 
potential energy efficiency and energy security gains to be 
realized with district energy systems.
    The Committee supports research and development on 
improving foundational materials and processes applicable to 
aluminum and other primary metal industries.

                         BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee recommends $195,000,000 for Building 
Technologies.
    The Committee supports ongoing efforts to work with State 
and local agencies to incorporate the latest technical 
knowledge and best practices into construction requirements.
    The Committee recommends $23,000,000 for the Residential 
Building Integration Program. Within this amount, the Committee 
encourages funding to be concentrated on industry teams to 
facilitate research, demonstrate and test new systems, and 
facilitate widespread deployment through direct engagement with 
builders, the construction trades, equipment manufacturers, 
smart grid technology and systems suppliers, integrators, and 
State and local governments.
    The Committee recommends $32,000,000 for Commercial 
Buildings Integration. The Committee encourages a program of 
core research and development of more cost-effective 
integration techniques and technologies that could help the 
transition towards deep retrofits. In addition, the Committee 
encourages that the Department increase engagement with private 
sector stakeholders to develop market transforming policies and 
investments in commercial building retrofits.
    The Committee recommends $90,000,000 for the Emerging 
Technologies subprogram. Within available funds, the Committee 
recommends not less than $23,000,000 for transactive controls 
research and development, within which $5,000,000 is to 
continue promoting regional demonstrations of new, utility-led, 
residential Connected Communities advancing smart grid systems. 
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $25,000,000 
for research, development, demonstration, and commercial 
application activities related to advanced solid-state lighting 
technology development. If the Secretary finds solid-state 
lighting technology eligible for the Twenty-First Century Lamp 
prize, specified under section 655 of the Energy Independence 
and Security Act of 2007, $5,000,000 shall be made available to 
fund the prize or additional projects for solid-state lighting 
research and development. Within available funds, the Committee 
recommends $10,000,000 for research and development for energy 
efficiency efforts related to the direct use of natural gas in 
residential applications, including gas heat pump heating and 
water heating, onsite combined heat and power, and natural gas 
appliance venting. Within available funds for heating, 
ventilation, air conditioning, and refrigeration research and 
development, the Committee is supportive of early-stage 
research in thermodynamic processes and cycles, materials 
research, component development, and systems and manufacturing 
techniques that enable performance advances in building 
equipment technologies.
    The Committee recommends $50,000,000 for Equipment and 
Buildings Standards.
    Energy efficiency is a critical component of infrastructure 
development strategy. The Committee recognizes the importance 
of the Transformation in Cities initiative for local government 
planning and directs the Department to continue to support the 
goals of the initiative.

              WEATHERIZATION AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL PROGRAM

    The Committee recommends $265,000,000 for the 
Weatherization and Intergovernmental Program.
    Within this amount, $215,000,000 is for the Weatherization 
Assistance Program [WAP], including $212,000,000 for 
Weatherization Assistance Grants and $3,000,000 for Training 
and Technical Assistance; and $50,000,000 is for State Energy 
Program grants.
    WAP grant funds are to be allocated on a statutory formula 
basis.
    The Committee recognizes the importance of providing 
Federal funds under the Weatherization and Intergovernmental 
Program to States and tribes in a timely manner in order to 
avoid any undue delay of services to eligible low-income 
households, and to encourage local high-impact energy 
efficiency and renewable energy initiatives and energy 
emergency preparedness. Therefore, the full amount of the funds 
appropriated for WAP and the State Energy Program shall be 
obligated to States, tribes, and other direct grantees no later 
than 60 days after enactment of this act.
    The Committee recognizes WAP as a critical program for 
creating jobs and addressing energy and environmental 
challenges of low-income households. Furthermore, the Committee 
notes the health risks posed by the presence of vermiculite in 
home insulation and the thousands of households unable to 
access WAP services as a result of the high cost of the 
remediation of vermiculite. The Committee directs the 
Department to make $500,000 available to current WAP grant 
recipients via the Weatherization Innovation Pilot Program to 
develop and implement strategies to treat harmful substances, 
including vermiculite.

                       CORPORATE SUPPORT PROGRAMS

    Within amounts recommended for Corporate Support, 
$6,000,000 is for the U.S.-Israel energy cooperative agreement, 
of which $4,000,000 is provided to establish the U.S.-Israel 
Center of Excellence in Energy Engineering and Water Technology 
as authorized by the United States-Israel Strategic Partnership 
Act (Public Law 113-296), and $2,000,000 is recommended to 
continue cooperative and collaborative work with the Israel-
U.S. Binational Industrial Research and Development Foundation. 
This joint research and development center between the U.S. and 
Israel shall focus on collaborative research initiatives among 
universities, research institutions, and industry partners that 
could include hydrocarbon extraction and processing, energy 
infrastructure and policies, process water treatment, 
alternative energy sources, and impacts on coastal communities. 
Funding provided shall be matched with Israeli government and 
industry funding.

              Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $230,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     120,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     213,141,000

    The Committee recommends $213,141,000 for Electricity 
Delivery and Energy Reliability, an increase of $93,141,000 
from the budget request. Within available funds, the Committee 
recommends $27,000,000 for program direction.
    Early-Stage Research, Electricity Sector.--The Committee 
rejects the budget's sole focus on early-stage research. Most 
utilities have limited research and development budgets, 
primarily due to regulatory constraints designed to keep 
electricity costs low for consumers. Additionally, utilities 
are unlikely to implement new concepts because most utilities 
would need to use their own systems for testing and evaluation, 
which could impact consumers. State public utility commissions 
also have limited budgets that do not support research and 
development. The States rely heavily on the Department's 
technical assistance on assessments of data and tools to help 
them evaluate grid modernization alternatives. The Department 
plays a vital role, not only in early-stage research, but also 
in deployment, field testing, and evaluation.

                        TRANSMISSION RELIABILITY

    The Committee recommends $36,000,000 for Transmission 
Reliability.
    The Committee encourages the Department to prioritize the 
development of computer simulation tools that can predict the 
behavior of new technologies, such as variable generation and 
electronic controls, on the grid. The Committee supports 
continued investment in advanced grid modeling algorithms and 
tool development to ensure resilient grid controls and 
protection systems that meet the challenges of the emerging 
smart grid.

                     RESILIENT DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS

    The Committee recommends $35,000,000 for Resilient 
Distribution Systems.
    Within available funding, $5,000,000 is recommended for 
field validation of sensors using data analytics for utilities 
to improve operations in steady-state and under extreme 
conditions, and to continue early-stage research to develop 
low-cost, printable sensors that can predict the health of 
critical equipment in the electric delivery system.
    The Committee supports the promotion of regional 
demonstrations of new, utility-led, residential Connected 
Communities advancing smart grid systems.
    The Committee recommends that funds provided for the 
Advanced Grid Integration Division shall focus on identifying 
and addressing technical and regulatory barriers impeding grid 
integration of distributed energy systems to reduce energy 
costs and improve the resiliency and reliability of the 
electric grid.
    The Committee supports advanced control concepts and open 
test beds for new distribution control tools for enhanced 
distribution system resilience.

               CYBERSECURITY FOR ENERGY DELIVERY SYSTEMS

    The Committee recommends $53,000,000 for Cybersecurity for 
Energy Delivery Systems.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends not less 
than $5,000,000 to develop cyber and cyber-physical solutions 
for advanced control concepts for distribution and municipal 
utility companies. The Committee encourages the Department to 
explore ways to get the Nation's critical infrastructure off 
the Internet to shield the Nation's electricity infrastructure 
from disruptive cyber penetration. Within available funds, the 
Department is directed to fund the third and final year of the 
Department of Energy Cooperative Agreement Projects DE-OE-
00000807, ``Improving the Cyber and Physical Security Posture 
of the Electric Sector'', and DE-OE-0000811, ``Improving the 
Cyber Resiliency and Security Posture of Public Power''.
    The Committee supports extension of cyber risk information 
sharing tools to close remaining vulnerabilities in the 
distribution and transmission system. The Committee encourages 
the Department to continue existing work within ongoing 
programs and encourages the Department to invest in research 
addressing power system vulnerabilities in supply chain and 
life cycle management for critical power system components and 
advanced adaptive defensive methods for grid control systems.

                             ENERGY STORAGE

    The Committee recommends $37,141,000 for Energy Storage.
    Within available funds, the Committee supports developing 
an operational energy storage test facility capable of 
performance-driven data in a utility environment.
    Within available funding, the Committee encourages the 
Department to further the development and demonstration of non-
battery advanced storage components, including compressed air 
energy storage development and demonstration to enable 
efficiency improvements for utility-scale, bulk energy storage 
solutions.
    The Committee notes that innovation and advancement in 
distributed energy resources is helping the Nation's power grid 
to better address reliability, resiliency, safety, and 
accessibility. This enhances our Nation's energy security and 
global leadership. The Committee encourages the Department to 
further advance the development and demonstration of innovative 
battery and non-battery energy storage components. Energy 
storage is needed to better enable distributed energy 
resources; integrate intermittent uses such as water heaters, 
electric vehicle chargers, battery storage systems, and pumps; 
help balance supply and demand in the power grid to aid 
consumers to better manage their energy costs; protect 
residential and commercial customers and public services from 
power interruptions; and improve grid security and reliability.
    The Committee supports grid-scale field demonstrations of 
energy storage projects, either as single facilities or as 
aggregations of units, with a focus on new use cases rather 
than new battery chemistry. The Committee encourages the 
Department to support State energy offices with energy storage 
planning and deployment, as well universities and to 
participate in industry-led safety codes and standards 
development. The Committee also supports funding for 
development of analytical methods for including energy storage 
in electric system planning, as well as for development of 
software tools to better value energy storage technologies. The 
Committee encourages the Department to consider expanding 
research and development partnerships related to the 
development and deployment of energy storage with stakeholders 
in diverse geographic regions with unique market dynamics and 
policy challenges that can help to inform nationwide efforts to 
improve grid resiliency, reliability, and security, empower 
consumers, and increase integration of a broad range of 
generation sources.
    The Committee is supportive of research for novel materials 
and system components to resolve key cost and performance 
challenges for electrochemical energy storage systems based on 
earth abundant advanced chemistries. In addition, the Committee 
supports continued materials research that will improve the 
understanding and predictability of energy storage systems and 
components, as well as enable safer and more reliable materials 
and systems to be developed.

             TRANSFORMER RESILIENCE AND ADVANCED COMPONENTS

    The Committee recommends $7,000,000 for Transformer 
Resilience and Advanced Components.
    Within available funds, the Committee directs the 
Department to continue to support research and development for 
advanced components and grid materials for low-cost, power flow 
control devices, including both solid state and hybrid concepts 
that use power electronics to control electromagnetic devices 
and enable improved controllability, flexibility, and 
resiliency.

             INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY AND ENERGY RESTORATION

    The Committee recommends $12,000,000 for Infrastructure 
Security and Energy Restoration. The Committee recommends an 
additional $3,000,000 above the request in recognition of the 
importance of the security of the energy sector.
    The Committee supports further development of energy sector 
situational awareness capabilities through Eagle-I, the Federal 
Government's situational awareness tool for national power 
outages. The Committee encourages the Department to further 
illustrate how to benefit from increased access to more varied 
sources of data.
    The Committee encourages the Department to continue to 
develop implementation strategies and analysis in partnership 
with industry, universities, and laboratories to address 
potential impacts to the electric grid from cyber-attacks, 
geomagnetic disturbances, and electromagnetic pulse threats. 
The Committee directs the Department to provide within 90 days 
of enactment of this act a report identifying strategic 
laboratory, university, and industry partnerships that would 
enhance national security and assist industry in addressing 
critical threats, including electromagnetic pulse, geomagnetic 
disturbances, cyber-attacks, and supply chain disruptions. The 
Committee encourages the Department to consider existing assets 
that can be used for testing to support operational awareness, 
situational security, and recovery of the Nation's critical 
grid infrastructure.

                             Nuclear Energy

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $1,016,616,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     703,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     917,020,000

    The Committee recommends $917,020,000 for Nuclear Energy, 
an increase of $214,020,000 from the budget request. The 
Committee's recommendation for nuclear power prioritizes 
funding for programs, projects and activities that will ensure 
a strong future for nuclear power in the United States.
    Nuclear power provides more than 20 percent of our Nation's 
electricity and nearly 60 percent of our emissions-free 
electricity. Electricity generation from our Nation's 99 
operating nuclear power plants is critical to our national 
security, economy, and way of life.

                        Research and Development

                     INTEGRATED UNIVERSITY PROGRAM

    The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for the Integrated 
University Program. The Committee notes the administration 
repeatedly attempts to defund this program, despite continued 
success in developing highly qualified nuclear specialists to 
meet national needs.

                   NUCLEAR ENERGY ENABLING TECHNOLOGY

    The Committee recommends $120,600,000 for Nuclear Energy 
Enabling Technology. Within this amount, the Committee 
recommends $37,000,000 for Crosscutting Technology Development, 
$28,200,000 for Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and 
Simulation, $31,100,000 for National Scientific User 
Facilities, and $24,300,000 for the Energy Innovation Hub for 
Modeling and Simulation. Funding for nuclear cybersecurity and 
hybrid electric systems is recommended only within Crosscutting 
Technology Development, as in previous years. Further, the 
Committee notes that the budget request made the short-sighted 
recommendation to cancel the Energy Innovation Hub for Modeling 
and Simulation, despite the important contributions it 
continues to make to improving operations and safety of 
operating nuclear reactors, and its likely application in 
licensing accident tolerant fuels and other advanced 
technologies.

       REACTOR CONCEPTS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, AND DEMONSTRATION

    The Committee recommends $132,000,000 for Reactor Concepts 
Research, Development, and Demonstration. Advanced nuclear 
technologies hold great promise for reliable, safe, emission-
free energy and should be a priority for the Department. Absent 
a clear set of goals for completing a program that demonstrates 
new technology can be deployed, the Department will continue to 
research concepts that never make it to the marketplace. The 
Committee directs the Department to provide a report to 
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress within 
180 days of the date of enactment of this act that sets 
aggressive, but achievable goals to demonstrate a variety of 
private-sector advanced reactor designs and fuel types by the 
late 2020s. The report shall include anticipated costs, both 
Federal and private, needed to achieve the goals. The 
Department shall collaborate with national laboratories, 
nuclear vendors, utilities, potential end users (such as 
petrochemical companies), and other stakeholders to identify 
subprogram priorities necessary to meet the identified goals.
    Advanced Reactor Technology.--Within available funds, the 
Committee recommends $92,000,000, including $18,000,000 for the 
third year of the advanced reactor concepts program and 
$3,000,000 for testing and development of dynamic convection 
technology. No funds are provided for engineering, design, or 
regulatory development for next generation light water reactor 
technologies.
    Versatile Fast Reactor.--The Committee recommends no 
funding for the Versatile Fast Reactor. The Department 
continues to recommend new programs or projects without showing 
any commitment to follow through with existing programs, 
especially key programs that show promise, or providing a 
detailed rationale for canceling those programs or projects. 
Accordingly, the Committee is reluctant to support a new multi-
billion dollar project. The Committee directs the Department to 
provide a report to the Committees on Appropriations of both 
Houses of Congress within 90 days after the date of enactment 
of this act that details all current programs and projects 
within the Office of Nuclear Energy, whether the Department 
plans to continue to support each program or project, and the 
expected out-year funding through completion of the program or 
project.
    Light Water Reactor Sustainability.--Within available 
funds, the Committee recommends $40,000,000. The most cost-
effective way for the United States to maintain low-cost, 
carbon-free electricity is to safely extend the lives of our 
Nation's existing nuclear reactors from 60 to 80 years. 
Therefore, the Committee recommends additional funding above 
the budget request for this activity as a priority. The 
Committee directs the Secretary to use funding in this activity 
to continue research and development work on the technical 
basis for subsequent license renewal. The Secretary shall focus 
funding in this program on materials aging and degradation, 
advanced instrumentation and control technologies, and 
component aging modeling and simulation. The Secretary shall 
also coordinate with industry to determine other areas of high-
priority research and development in this area.

                  FUEL CYCLE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

    The Committee recommends $213,500,000 for Fuel Cycle 
Research and Development. No defense function funds are 
provided. Within available funds, $14,000,000 is for Material 
Recovery and Waste Form Development, $6,000,000 is for 
Materials Protection, Accountancy, and Controls for 
Transmutation, and $8,500,000 is for Systems Analysis and 
Integration.
    The Committee continues to strongly support the 
recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Commission on America's 
Nuclear Future and believes that near-term action is needed to 
address the accumulating inventory of spent nuclear fuel. The 
Committee recommends $35,000,000 for Integrated Waste 
Management System activities. Funding should be used to 
implement plans to consolidate spent nuclear fuel from around 
the United States to one or more private or government interim 
central storage facilities. Priority shall be given to 
accepting spent nuclear fuel from shutdown reactors, and to 
accelerating the development of a transportation capability to 
move spent fuel from its current storage locations. Within 
funds provided, the Committee recommends up to $10,000,000 for 
the Secretary, within existing authorities, to contract for the 
management of spent nuclear fuel to which the Secretary holds 
the title or has a contract to accept title, which includes 
contracting with a private company for consolidated interim 
storage of spent nuclear fuel.
    The Committee does not adopt the budget proposal to 
eliminate research and development activities previously funded 
in this account. The Committee recommends $65,000,000 to 
continue research and development activities on behavior of 
spent fuel in long-term storage, under transportation 
conditions, and in various geologic media, which will continue 
to be important to developing a new solution to the waste 
problem. Priority shall be placed on the ongoing study of the 
performance of high-burnup fuel in dry storage and on the 
potential for direct disposal of existing spent fuel dry 
storage canister technologies.
    The Committee continues to place a high priority on the 
development of nuclear fuels with enhanced accident-tolerant 
characteristics in order to significantly mitigate the 
potential consequences of a nuclear accident. The Committee 
urges the Secretary to maintain focus and priority on achieving 
results in these efforts. The Committee recommends $85,000,000 
for the Advanced Fuels program. The Department is directed to 
continue implementation of the accident tolerant fuels 
development program, the goal of which remains development of 
accident tolerant nuclear fuels leading to commercial reactor 
fuel assembly testing by 2022. Within this amount not less than 
$55,600,000 is recommended to continue the participation of 
three industry-led teams in Phase 2 of the cost-shared research 
and development program. Further the Committee recommends not 
less than $20,000,000 to support accident tolerant fuels 
development at the national laboratories and other facilities, 
including at the Advanced Test Reactor, the Transient Reactor 
Test Facility, and the Halden reactor. In addition to amounts 
awarded through the Small Business Innovation Research and 
Small Business Technology Transfer programs, $3,000,000 is to 
continue of the previously awarded small business projects to 
develop ceramic cladding for accident tolerant fuels.

                             Infrastructure

                   RADIOLOGICAL FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

    The Committee recommends $24,000,000 for Radiological 
Facilities Management, including $15,000,000 for continued safe 
operations and maintenance of Oak Ridge National Laboratory hot 
cells.

                      IDAHO FACILITIES MANAGEMENT

    The Committee recommends $216,202,000 for Idaho Facilities 
Management, which includes $12,000,000 above the requested 
level for operations and maintenance of the Advanced Test 
Reactor. The Advanced Test Reactor [ATR] is a vital asset that 
provides research capability across the Department. The 
Committee does not agree with the Department's proposal to 
shift additional costs for ATR operations to Defense function 
funds, particularly without any justification for the change. 
The Committee directs the Department to provide a report to the 
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress not 
later than December 31, 2017, that lists all current and 
planned users for the ATR for the next 3 years, the operating 
cost attributed to each user, and the source of funds that will 
be applied to cover the costs for each user. Further, the 
Committee encourages the Department to fully fund ATR 
operations within the budget request for the Office of Nuclear 
Energy, including both Defense and non-Defense function 
funding.

                 Fossil Energy Research and Development

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $668,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     280,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     572,701,000

    The Committee recommends $572,701,000 for Fossil Energy 
Research and Development, an increase of $292,701,000 above the 
budget request. Within available funds, the Committee 
recommends $57,000,000 for program direction. The Committee 
directs the use of $29,236,000 from prior year balances.
    Early-Stage Research and Development.--The Fossil Energy 
Research and Development program advances transformative 
scientific research, development, and deployment of 
technologies that enable the reliable, efficient, affordable, 
and environmentally sound use of fossil fuels. Fossil energy is 
an essential part of the United States' energy future, and the 
National Energy Technology Laboratory [NETL] supports the 
Office of Fossil Energy in this critical national priority. The 
Committee rejects the approach to only provide funds for early-
stage research. Such restrictions would cripple innovation and 
development, and would reduce the number of energy technologies 
adopted in the marketplace.
    Fossil Energy Roadmap.--The Committee directs the 
Department to develop a cohesive policy strategy and supporting 
roadmap or long term plan for its Fossil Energy Research and 
Development portfolio and supporting infrastructure to guide 
the discovery or advancement of technological solutions that 
incorporate lessons learned for the future of research, 
development, and demonstration efforts on advanced carbon 
capture and storage [CCS] technologies, advanced fossil energy 
systems, and crosscutting fossil energy research, as well as 
guide the discovery or advancement of technological solutions 
for the prudent and sustainable development of unconventional 
oil and gas. The Department is directed to deliver the ``Fossil 
Energy Roadmap'' to the Committees on Appropriations of both 
Houses of Congress within 1 year of enactment of this act.
    NETL.--No funds provided in by this Act shall be used for 
the closure of NETL sites. The Committee is supportive of 
NETL's mission to discover, develop, and deploy new 
technologies to support a strong domestic fossil energy path. 
The Committee directs the Department to conduct a comprehensive 
assessment of Fossil Energy writ large to include the Fossil 
Energy Headquarters programs, NETL, and relevant competencies 
of other national laboratories which support the mission of the 
Office of Fossil Energy. The assessment will include an 
examination of the roles and responsibilities of staff within 
the Headquarters program, operations offices, and NETL to 
ensure the fossil energy research and development portfolio and 
supporting infrastructure are responsive to a cohesive policy 
strategy.
    National Carbon Capture Center.--The Committee recommends 
funding for the Department's National Carbon Capture Center 
consistent with the cooperative agreement and fiscal year 2017. 
The Committee continues to encourage the Department to 
establish university partnerships to support ongoing fossil 
energy programs, to promote broader research into CCS 
technologies, and to expand its technology transfer efforts. 
The Department has previously funded several university-based 
CCS projects and is encouraged to build on an established 
research base to support ongoing research and to address the 
wider implementation of CCS technologies.
    The Committee reiterates the importance of adequate Federal 
support to promote design-related work and testing for a 
commercial-scale, post-combustion carbon dioxide capture 
project on an existing coal-fueled generating unit as well as 
fossil energy research, development, and deployment of 
breakthrough technologies.

                       COAL CCS AND POWER SYSTEMS

    The Committee recommends $342,054,000 for Coal CCS and 
Power Systems.
    The Committee supports the Department's Cooperative 
Agreements to develop cost sharing partnerships to conduct 
basic, fundamental, and applied research that assist industry 
in developing, deploying, and commercializing efficient, low-
carbon, nonpolluting energy technologies that could compete 
effectively in meeting requirements for clean fuels, chemical 
feedstocks, electricity, and water resources. The Committee 
encourages the Department to fund activities that promote the 
reuse of captured carbon dioxide from coal, natural gas, 
industrial facilities, and other sources for the production of 
fuels and other valuable products. Within the ongoing CCS 
Program, the Department is encouraged to pursue an aggressive 
timeline to develop advanced carbon storage and utilization 
technologies and enhanced oil recovery that will improve the 
economics associated with domestic energy production.
    Carbon Storage.--Within available funds for Carbon Storage, 
the Committee recommends $10,000,000 for Carbon Use and Reuse 
to continue research and development activities to support 
valuable and innovative uses for carbon. The Committee believes 
the potential for carbon dioxide utilization technologies to 
become economically viable has improved in recent years and 
these technologies should continue to receive attention from 
the Department. The Committee urges the Department to support 
carbon dioxide utilization technologies and direct air capture 
technologies, including using carbon dioxide to produce algae. 
The Committee encourages the Office of Fossil Energy to 
collaborate with the Bioenergy Technologies program within EERE 
to support projects that utilize carbon dioxide in the 
production of algae and other potentially marketable products. 
Within the Storage Infrastructure subprogram, the Committee 
recemmends not less than $40,000,000 and directs the Department 
to issue a new solicitation for the Regional Carbon 
Sequestration Partnerships and CarbonSAFE. The Committee 
encourages the Department to focus on value-added business case 
opportunities and to address potential changing markets related 
to natural gas power generation and emissions from industrial 
sources. Further, the Committee supports the Regional Carbon 
Sequestration Partnerships' focus on infrastructure development 
strategies for regional and national carbon dioxide 
transportation and distribution systems that will be the 
catalyst for commercial ventures in carbon storage and 
utilization.
    Advanced Energy Systems.--Within funds available for 
Advanced Energy Systems, the Committee recommends not less than 
$30,000,000 for solid oxide fuel cell systems, which support 
research and development to enable efficient, cost-effective 
electricity generation with minimal use of water. The Committee 
recommends $23,250,000 for Gasification Systems, of which 
$7,440,000 is for the Advanced Air Separation Program to 
continue activities improving advanced air separation 
technologies. The Committee encourages the Department to 
support research and development efforts for new, higher 
efficiency gas turbines used in power generation systems to 
upgrade and increase the resiliency of the Nation's electrical 
grid system, while reducing the cost of electricity and 
emissions. This should include partnerships with industry, 
small businesses, universities, and other appropriate parties. 
The Committee supports advancing the maturity of affordable 
clean energy technology for new plants and upgrading existing 
plants. The Committee is concerned with the lack of funding for 
wastewater treatment at existing power plants and supports 
conducting techno-economic studies and pilot tests of 
combustion technology to treat coal plant wastewater while 
generating excess electricity to offset the water treatment 
costs.
    Crosscutting Research.--The Committee supports Advanced 
Ultrasupercritical Materials research and development to 
identify, test, qualify, and develop a domestic supply chain 
capable of producing components from high temperature steam 
materials.

                        NATURAL GAS TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee recommends $45,018,000 for Natural Gas 
Technologies. The Committee encourages the Department to 
support the research and demonstration of natural gas 
conversion technologies, which include waste-gas heat-to-
electricity applications to create energy self-sufficient, 
high-efficiency, low-emission, oil and gas production sites on 
Federal and tribal lands. The Department is encouraged to 
address technical challenges to offshore oil and gas 
exploration and production, focusing on the development of 
technologies that enhance safe drilling operations, improving 
well integrity, improving riser designs and integrity, and 
safely extending the life and productivity of aging offshore 
oil and gas infrastructure. The Committee encourages the 
Department to support work related to blowout prevention.
    Risk-Based Data Management System.--Within available funds, 
the Committee recommends $5,200,000 to continue the Risk Based 
Data Management System [RBDMS] to support a cloud-based 
application and necessary cybersecurity initiatives. In 
addition, funding shall support the continued integration of 
FracFocus and RBDMS for improved public access to State oil and 
gas related data, as well as for State regulatory agencies to 
support electronic permitting for operators, eForms for 
improved processing time for new permits, operator training 
from the improved FracFocus 3.2 after enhancements are 
implemented, and miscellaneous reports, such as ``Produced 
Water Report: Current and Future Beneficial Uses Report.'' The 
Committee supports the continued efforts to provide public 
transparency, while protecting proprietary information.
    Methane Hydrate Activities.--The Committee recommends 
$19,800,000 for methane hydrates, and notes that the request 
includes no money for actual research into the methods for 
producing methane hydrates. The Committee recommendation 
encourages the Secretary to perform a long-term methane hydrate 
production test in the Arctic, as proposed in the Methane 
Hydrate Advisory Committee's May 21, 2014, recommendations to 
the Secretary.
    Ethane Storage Hub.--The Committee understands the 
Department is conducting a study on the feasibility of 
establishing an ethane storage and distribution hub in central 
Appalachia. The Department is further directed to identify the 
Federal agencies with jurisdictional oversight of such a 
project and to coordinate with the liaisons of those agencies 
to streamline the permitting application and approval process 
for a central Appalachian ethane storage and distribution hub.
    Environmentally Prudent Development.--The Committee 
recommends $7,000,000 for the Environmentally Prudent 
Development subprogram.
    Emissions Mitigation from Midstream Infrastructure.--The 
Committee recommends $9,000,000 for the Emissions Mitigation 
from Midstream Infrastructure subprogram. The Committee 
believes that the development, production, and transportation 
of natural gas should be done safely, without contamination, 
and in a way that reduces fugitive methane emissions. These 
practices are essential for mitigating environmental harms from 
shale gas development and reducing waste contamination. The 
Committee encourages the Department to continue developing 
advanced pipeline inspection technologies to aid in cleaner and 
safer oil and gas development. The Committee recommends funds 
for natural gas infrastructure research, including advanced 
materials and novel sensor technologies. The Department is 
directed to incorporate this research into its ongoing work in 
this field, so that it shall complement the Emissions 
Mitigation from Midstream Infrastructure subprogram.
    Emissions Quantification from Natural Gas Infrastructure.--
The Committee recommends $4,018,000 for the Emissions 
Quantification from Natural Gas Infrastructure research 
subprogram.

               UNCONVENTIONAL FOSSIL ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES

    The Committee recommends $26,319,000 for Unconventional 
Fossil Energy Technologies. The Committee notes the importance 
of providing research support that will assure sustainable, 
reliable, affordable, and environmentally sound supplies of 
domestic unconventional fossil energy resources.
    The Secretary is encouraged to fund high-priority research, 
development, and deployment activities for unconventional oil, 
gas, and coal resources, including oil shale, as outlined in 
the September 2011 Domestic Unconventional Fossil Energy 
Resource Opportunities and Technology Applications report.
    The Committee recommends $7,660,000 for research to better 
understand reservoirs and to improve low recovery factors from 
unconventional natural gas and oil wells through more efficient 
well completion methods. An additional $7,659,000 is provided 
to continue research toward enhanced recovery technologies in 
shale oil, low permeability reservoirs, residual oil zone 
reservoirs and technology transfer methods. These efforts 
should be coordinated by the Department on a nationwide basis 
through a consortium of researchers and industry. Funds shall 
be awarded to a not-for-profit or university consortium 
comprised of multidisciplinary teams from industry, academia, 
and stakeholder groups that may also include State 
organizations. The projects will include research projects to 
improve environmental mitigation, water quality and treatment, 
infrastructure technology as well as the societal impacts of 
unconventional shale plays. These awards shall identify ways to 
improve existing technologies, encourage prudent development, 
provide cost effective solutions, and develop a better 
understanding of these reservoirs' resource potential.
    The Committee directs the Department, in consultation with 
the Department of Transportation, to complete the crude oil 
characterization study to improve the safety of crude oil 
transported by rail. The Committee recommends up to $1,000,000 
for completion of the study.
    The Committee recommends not less than $10,000,000 for the 
Unconventional Field Test Sites.
    The Committee supports research and development for 
drilling technologies that use little to no water. Further, the 
Committee supports research on multipronged approaches for 
characterizing the constituents of and managing the cleaning of 
water produced during the extraction of oil and natural gas, 
and encourages the Department to partner with research 
universities engaged in the study of characterizing, cleaning, 
treating, and managing produced water and industry partners to 
develop and assess commercially viable technology to achieve 
the same. The Committee encourages the Department to work with 
industry to identify and develop technologies that can 
characterize, clean, and effectively treat produced water to 
have beneficial reuse.
    The Committee recognizes that the United States possesses 
vast domestic coal reserves that cannot be mined economically 
at current prices. Although some natural gas is absorbed by 
coal and can be economically recovered through methane 
extraction, more efficient recovery mechanisms are feasible. To 
validate methods for recovering a greater fraction of energy 
contained in deep coal deposits, the Committee encourages the 
Department to conduct pilot field tests of technologies for in-
situ biological conversion of coal to natural gas with 
university participants, and evaluate the feasibility of 
converting coal deposits in both the Western and Eastern United 
States into natural gas.

                 NATIONAL ENERGY TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY

    The Committee recommends $72,663,000 for NETL Research and 
Development and $58,683,000 for NETL Infrastructure and 
Operations.
    The Committee remains supportive of the reorganization and 
budget restructuring of NETL, as it increases consistency with 
other national laboratories. The structure highlights research 
and development, as well as infrastructure and operational 
funding requirements, reflects increased transparency in how 
funds are utilized, and promotes enhanced visibility and 
oversight into cost drivers and more efficient resource 
allocation decisions.
    Within NETL Research and Development, the Committee 
commends the Department for including in their request support 
for the Feasibility of Recovering Rare Earth Elements. The 
Committee recommends $15,000,000 for the Department to expand 
its external agency activities to develop and test commercially 
viable advanced separation technologies at proof-of-concept or 
pilot scale that can be deployed near term for the extraction 
and recovery of rare earth elements and minerals from U.S. coal 
and coal byproduct sources having the highest potential for 
success. The Committee encourages the Department to leverage 
the capabilities of outside applied researchers in implementing 
these activities. The Committee directs the Department to 
establish university partnerships to support efforts to 
increase production of unconventional fossil fuels through 
innovative seismic research, including optimizing high 
resolution and time-lapse geophysical methods for improved 
resource detection and better rock characterization. The 
objective of this research is to facilitate necessary 
technology development, expand understanding of subsurface 
dynamics, encourage prudent development and develop best 
practices and tools.
    Within NETL Infrastructure and Operations, the Committee 
directs the Department to prioritize funds to provide site-wide 
upgrades for safety, avoid an increase in deferred maintenance, 
and provide for the continued update and refresh of Joule 
through the second year of a 3-year lease.

                 Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $14,950,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       4,900,000
Committee recommendation................................       4,900,000

    The Committee recommends $4,900,000 for Naval Petroleum and 
Oil Shale Reserves, the same as the budget request. The 
Committee directs the use of $15,300,000 from prior year 
balances.

                      Strategic Petroleum Reserve

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $223,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     180,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     180,000,000

    The Committee recommends $180,000,000 for the Strategic 
Petroleum Reserve, the same as the budget request.
    The Committee understands the importance of the major 
maintenance projects and preventive/corrective maintenance 
activities needed at the Strategic Petroleum Reserve storage 
facilities and related facilities, and encourages the 
Department, when carrying out these maintenance and other 
construction projects to use as much American-made iron, steel, 
and other manufactured goods as possible.

         Energy Security and Infrastructure Modernization Fund

                           SALE OF CRUDE OIL

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $340,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     350,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     350,000,000

                          USE OF SALE PROCEEDS

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $340,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     350,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     350,000,000

    The Committee's recommendation includes direction to the 
Department to draw down and sell not more than $350,000,000 of 
crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in fiscal year 
2018. The proceeds from such drawdown shall be deposited in the 
Energy Security and Infrastructure Modernization Fund during 
fiscal year 2018, and shall be available until expended.

                   Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve

Appropriations, 2017....................................      $6,500,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       6,500,000
Committee recommendation................................       6,500,000

    The Committee recommends $6,500,000 for the Northeast Home 
Heating Oil Reserve, the same as the request.

                   Energy Information Administration

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $122,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     118,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     122,000,000

    The Committee recommends $122,000,000 for the Energy 
Information Administration [EIA], an increase of $4,000,000 
above the budget request.
    The Committee supports the EIA's efforts to expand its 
monthly State-level estimates of generation and capacity of 
small-scale distributed generation systems.
    The Committee recognizes the importance of building energy 
information and the opportunity for better data collection 
presented by new technologies. The Department is encouraged to 
upgrade the Commercial Buildings Energy Consumption Surveys to 
a real-time data collection system with rapid reporting of 
results, without compromising statistical validity or data 
security.

                   Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $247,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     218,400,000
Committee recommendation................................     266,000,000

    The Committee recommends $266,000,000 for Non-Defense 
Environmental Cleanup, an increase of $47,600,000 above the 
budget request.
    Small Sites.--The Committee recommends $87,456,000 for 
Small Sites. Within the available funds, the Committee 
recommends $8,000,000 for work required pursuant to the 
agreement reached in 2012 between the Department of Energy, the 
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, and State and local 
governments to complete the demolition of K-25 in exchange for 
preserving the historic contributions made by the K-25 site to 
the Manhattan Project. The Manhattan Project National 
Historical Park tells an important story in our Nation's 
history: the development and production of the technology and 
materials necessary to create the world's first atomic bomb. 
The new park has locations in Hanford, Washington, Los Alamos, 
New Mexico, and Oak Ridge, Tennessee. It is administered and 
operated by the National Park Service in conjunction with the 
Department of Energy, which is working towards cleanup of these 
nuclear waste sites.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$21,000,000 to continue to deactivate, decommission, and 
demolish facilities at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 
and $38,456,000 for Moab.

      Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $768,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     752,749,000
Committee recommendation................................     788,000,000

    The Committee recommends $788,000,000 for Uranium 
Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning [UED&D] 
activities, an increase of $35,251,000 above the budget 
request.
    The Committee recommendation includes $194,673,000 for East 
Tennessee Technology Park, $205,530,000 for Paducah, and 
$351,271,000 for Portsmouth.
    The Committee recommends $13,732,000 for the Title X 
Uranium and Thorium Reimbursement Program. Title X of the 
Energy Policy Act of 1992 authorizes the Secretary to reimburse 
eligible licensees for the Federal Government's share of the 
cost associated with cleaning up former uranium and thorium 
processing sites across the country.

                                Science

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $5,392,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................   4,472,516,000
Committee recommendation................................   5,550,000,000

    The Committee recommends $5,550,000,000 for Science, an 
increase of $1,077,484,000 above the budget request.
    Distinguished Scientist Program.--The Committee recommends 
$2,000,000 to support the Department's Distinguished Scientist 
Program, as authorized in section 5011 of Public Law 110-69 to 
promote scientific and academic excellence through 
collaborations between institutions of higher education and 
national laboratories to be funded from across all Office of 
Science programs.
    Interagency Collaborations.--The Committee continues to 
support the Department's partnerships with the National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Medicare 
and Medicaid Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, 
Department of Homeland Security, and national security 
agencies.
    The Committee supports the Department's contributions to 
the BRAIN initiative through the development of imaging and 
sensing tools and technologies at x-ray light sources and 
nanoscale research centers, as well as computational expertise, 
high performance computing, and data management. This 
complementary, multi-agency initiative is encouraged to take 
advantage of existing Department investments and infrastructure 
while engaging closely with the neuroscience community to 
accelerate our understanding of the brain.
    The Committee also encourages and supports the use of 
national laboratory user facilities for the National Cancer 
Moonshot Initiative.

                 ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING RESEARCH

    The Committee recommends $763,000,000 for Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research.
    The Committee is supportive of the plan to accelerate 
delivery of at least one exascale-capable system in 2021, 
reasserting U.S. leadership in this critical area.
    The Committee recommends $184,000,000 for the Exascale 
Computing Project. In addition, the Committee recommends 
$150,000,000 for the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, 
$100,000,000 for the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, 
$94,000,000 for the National Energy Research Scientific 
Computing Center, and $79,000,000 for ESnet. Further, the 
Committee recommends $10,000,000 for the Computational Sciences 
Graduate Program. The Committee recommends $24,559,000 for 
Research and Evaluation Prototypes. The Committee recommends 
not less than $117,392,000 for Mathematical, Computational, and 
Computer Sciences Research.

                         BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES

    The Committee recommends $1,980,300,000 for Basic Energy 
Sciences [BES], and includes an accompanying table regarding 
control points, which the Department shall follow in expending 
these funds.

                          BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES
                        [In thousands of dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Budget         Committee
                  Item                       estimate     recommendation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
MATERIALS SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING:
    EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM TO STIMULATE     ..............          20,000
     COMPETITIVE RESEARCH...............
    ENERGY FRONTIER RESEARCH CENTERS....          50,809          55,800
    ENERGY INNOVATION HUB, BATTERIES AND  ..............          24,088
     ENERGY STORAGE.....................
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCES....  ..............          12,000
    OTHER MATERIALS SCIENCES AND                 255,828         254,857
     ENGINEERING........................
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, MATERIALS SCIENCES AND           306,637         366,745
       ENGINEERING......................
 
CHEMICAL SCIENCES, GEOSCIENCES, AND
 BIOSCIENCES:
    ENERGY FRONTIER RESEARCH CENTERS....          48,065          54,200
    ENERGY INNOVATION HUB, FUELS FROM     ..............          15,000
     SUNLIGHT...........................
    COMPUTATIONAL CHEMICAL SCIENCES.....  ..............          13,489
    OTHER CHEMICAL SCIENCES,                     217,550         247,995
     GEOSCIENCES, AND BIOSCIENCES.......
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, CHEMICAL SCIENCES,               265,615         330,684
       GEOSCIENCES, AND BIOSCIENCES.....
 
SCIENTIFIC USER FACILITIES:
    SYNCHROTRON RADIATION LIGHT SOURCES:
        ADVANCED LIGHT SOURCE...........          59,010          65,950
        ADVANCED PHOTON SOURCE..........         122,075         133,995
        NATIONAL SYNCHROTRON LIGHT               102,952         111,834
         SOURCE-II......................
        STANFORD SYNCHROTRON RADIATION            20,000          41,986
         LIGHTSOURCE....................
        LINAC COHERENT LIGHT SOURCE.....         124,169         142,294
                                         -------------------------------
          SUBTOTAL, SYNCHROTRON                  428,206         496,059
           RADIATION LIGHT SOURCES......
 
    HIGH-FLUX NEUTRON SOURCES:
        SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCE.......         168,847         193,200
        HIGH FLUX ISOTOPE REACTOR.......          56,773          65,000
                                         -------------------------------
          SUBTOTAL, HIGH-FLUX NEUTRON            225,620         258,200
           SOURCES......................
 
    NANOSCALE SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTERS:
        CENTER FOR NANOSCALE MATERIALS..          22,913          25,205
        CENTER FOR FUNCTIONAL             ..............          21,418
         NANOMATERIALS..................
        MOLECULAR FOUNDRY...............          25,823          31,500
        CENTER FOR NANOPHASE MATERIALS            22,399          24,638
         SCIENCES.......................
        CENTER FOR INTEGRATED             ..............          22,605
         NANOTECHNOLOGIES...............
                                         -------------------------------
          SUBTOTAL, NANOSCALE SCIENCE             71,135         125,366
           RESEARCH CENTERS.............
 
    OTHER PROJECT COSTS:
        LINAC COHERENT LIGHT SOURCE II..           7,900  ..............
    RESEARCH:
        ACCELERATOR AND DETECTOR                  19,724          23,517
         RESEARCH.......................
        LONG TERM SURVEILLANCE AND        ..............           7,000
         MAINTENANCE....................
                                         -------------------------------
          SUBTOTAL, RESEARCH............          19,724          30,517
 
    SBIR/STTR...........................          27,563          33,729
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, SCIENTIFIC USER                  780,148         943,871
       FACILITIES.......................
 
CONSTRUCTION:
    13-SC-10 LINAC COHERENT LIGHT SOURCE         182,100         200,000
     II (LCLS-II), SLAC.................
    18-SC-10 ADVANCED PHOTON SOURCE               20,000          93,000
     UPGRADE (APS-U), ANL...............
    18-SC-11 SPALLATION NEUTRON SOURCE    ..............          26,000
     PROTON POWER UPGRADE (PPU), ORNL...
    18-SC-12 ADVANCED LIGHT SOURCE        ..............          20,000
     UPGRADE (ALS-U), LBNL..............
                                         -------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL, CONSTRUCTION............         202,100         339,000
                                         -------------------------------
      TOTAL, BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES......       1,554,500       1,980,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Committee recommends not less than $110,000,000 for the 
Energy Frontier Research Centers to continue multi-
disciplinary, fundamental research needed to address scientific 
grand challenges. The Committee recommends $20,000,000 for the 
Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research 
[EPSCoR], and rejects the proposed termination of the program. 
The Committee understands the Department has either delayed or 
does not intend to initiate a renewal for the Batteries and 
Energy Storage Hub, the Joint Center for Energy Storage 
Research [JCESR]. The Committee directs the Department to move 
forward with the review and renewal process to support the next 
5-year charter for next-generation battery and storage 
technologies. Recognizing the critical role battery and energy 
storage technologies play in both the transportation and 
electricity sectors, the Committee recommends not less than 
$24,088,000 for JCESR. In addition, the Committee recommends 
not less than $15,000,000 for the Fuels from Sunlight Hub, the 
Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis [JCAP] to continue 
to perform research on the fundamental science of carbon 
dioxide reduction needed to enable efficient, sustainable 
solar-driven production of liquid transportation fuels. The 
Committee recommends not less than $125,366,000 to continue the 
five existing Nanoscale Science Research Centers, and rejects 
the proposed termination of both the Center for Functional 
Nanomaterials and the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies.
    The Committee recommends $496,059,000 for the five BES 
light sources to fully support research and allow the 
facilities to proceed with necessary maintenance, routine 
accelerator and instrumentation improvements, and crucial staff 
hires or replacements. The Committee recognizes the critical 
role that light sources play in the Nation's innovation 
ecosystem, and the growing support for them by U.S. researchers 
and industry. In light of increased international investment in 
these unique scientific resources and the consequences for U.S. 
innovation leadership, the Committee continues to support 
efforts to upgrade and renew these facilities across the full 
spectrum of x-ray capabilities. In support of the priority 
recommendations from recent Basic Energy Sciences Advisory 
Committee reports, the Committee recommends $6,000,000 for the 
High Energy Upgrade at LCLS II. In addition, the Committee 
recommends $93,000,000 for the Advanced Photon Source Upgrade.
    The Committee recommends $258,200,000 for high-flux neutron 
sources, which will allow for both Spallation Neutron Source 
[SNS] and High Flux Isotope Reactor [HFIR] to proceed with the 
most critical deferred repairs, replace outdated instruments, 
and make essential machine improvements. The Committee does not 
recommend funding for the Lujan Neutron Scattering Center.
    Construction.--The Committee recommends funding for two new 
projects as shown in the table below. Within the amounts 
recommended for construction, the Committee recommends 
$26,000,000 for preliminary engineering and design of the 
Proton Power Upgrade project at SNS, and to continue work 
towards a project baseline. In addition, the Committee 
recommends $20,000,000 for the Advanced Light Source Upgrade.
    The Committee recommends $7,000,000 for ongoing 
surveillance and monitoring activities designed to detect 
groundwater contamination at or near Brookhaven National 
Laboratory from the legacy High Flux Beam Reactor. The 
Committee recommends $26,000,000 for exascale systems.
    The Committee supports funding for energy research 
activities related to enhanced efficiency in energy conversion 
and utilization, including emergent polymer optoelectronic 
technologies, to ensure continued competitiveness in a global 
marketplace. The Department is directed to continue its 
partnership with qualified institutions of higher education in 
this effort. The Committee encourages the Secretary to continue 
funding to support research and development needs of graduate 
and post-graduate science programs at Historically Black 
Colleges and Universities.

                 BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

    The Committee recommends $633,000,000 for Biological and 
Environmental Research. The Committee rejects the short-sighted 
reductions proposed in the budget request. The Committee 
recognizes the unique and beneficial role that the Department 
plays for the Nation in the advancement of biosciences to 
address core departmental missions in energy and the 
environment. The Department is directed to give priority to 
optimizing the operation of Biological and Environmental 
Research User Facilities.
    The Committee recommends $321,721,000 for Biological 
Systems Science, including not less than $90,000,000 for the 
four recently-selected Bioenergy Research Centers for the first 
year of their renewal funding period, including $25,000,000 for 
the three existing centers and $15,000,000 for the new awardee. 
The Committee directs the Department to maintain Genomic 
Science as a top priority, and continues to support the 
Mesoscale to Molecules activity. The Committee recommends 
$69,300,000 for the Joint Genome Institute, an essential 
component for genomic research.
    The Committee recommends $311,279,000 for Earth and 
Environmental Systems Sciences. Within available funds, the 
Committee recommends not less than $43,200,000 for the 
Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, not less than 
$65,400,000 for the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement User 
Facility, not less than $10,000,000 for NGEE-Arctic, and not 
less than $8,300,000 for the SPRUCE field site. The Committee 
also recommends $3,000,000 to support ongoing research and 
discovery related to mercury biogeochemical transformations in 
the environment. The Committee recommends $10,000,000 to 
support the exascale computing initiative. The Committee 
directs the Department to expend appropriated funds for 
critical research on environmental science. In addition, the 
Committee remains concerned about the delay in the current 
review process, and directs the Department to continue to move 
forward in awarding grants.
    The Committee encourages the Department to increase funding 
for academia to perform climate model studies that include the 
collection and evaluation of atmospheric data sets from 
satellite observations obtained in cooperation with NASA. 
Satellite observations of the atmosphere, within the context of 
the Earth as a global system, provide information that is 
critical in the interpretation of Earth-based observations.

                         FUSION ENERGY SCIENCES

    The Committee recommends $232,000,000 for Fusion Energy 
Sciences.
    U.S. Contribution to ITER.--The Committee recommends no 
funding for the International Thermonuclear Experimental 
Reactor [ITER] project, as this funding would come at the 
expense of other Office of Science priorities.
    The Committee recommends the Department prioritize 
operations and research for DIII-D tokomak facility.
    The Committee remains concerned about the timeline of 
facility repair and recovery actions for the National Spherical 
Torus Experiment Upgrade [NSTX-U], as operations have ceased 
through at least fiscal year 2019. The Committee directs the 
Department to assess science drivers for the NSTX-U to support 
future planning and reconfiguration for the Fusion Energy 
Sciences program, and provide a briefing to the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress upon completion.
    The Committee supports continued research in the Fusion 
Energy Sciences Program on High Energy Density Plasmas and 
recognizes the partnerships between the laboratories and 
research universities to address the critical need for skilled 
graduates to replace an aging workforce.

                          HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS

    The Committee recommends $860,000,000 for High Energy 
Physics. The Committee strongly supports the Secretary's 
efforts to advance the recommendations of the Particle Physics 
Project Prioritization Panel Report, which established clear 
priorities for the domestic particle physics program.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$82,000,000 for the Long Baseline Neutrino Facility/Deep 
Underground Neutrino Experiment. The Committee recommends 
funding for the Muon to Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) 
consistent with the approved baseline funding profile and 
$5,000,000 to continue the upgrade of the Facility for Advanced 
Accelerator Experimental Tests II. In addition, the Committee 
continues to strongly support U.S. participation in the Large 
Hadron Collider [LHC] at CERN, and directs the Department to 
prioritize and provide optimal funding for the LHC accelerator 
upgrades and the LHC CMS and ATLAS collaboration activities.
    Within Cosmic Frontier Experimental Physics, the Committee 
recommends $17,500,000 for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic 
Instrument and $14,100,000 for the G2 Dark Matter Experiment 
LUX ZEPLIN. The Committee recommends $9,800,000 for the Large 
Synoptic Survey Telescope Camera. The Committee recommends 
$24,100,000 for the Proton Improvement Project II at Fermi 
National Laboratory. This funding will advance design work for 
accelerator upgrades that will support the LBNF project. The 
Committee also recommends $7,400,000 for SuperCDMS-SnoLab.

                            NUCLEAR PHYSICS

    The Committee recommends $639,200,000 for Nuclear Physics, 
and strongly supports the 2015 Long Range Plan for Nuclear 
Science released in October 2015 to address important 
scientific questions with modest or constrained growth in the 
nuclear science budgets, while still maintaining a strong, 
vital and world leading program.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$97,200,000 for the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams [FRIB], and 
encourages the Department to work with Michigan State 
University to commence early operations at FRIB. The Committee 
also recommends $5,000,000 for the Stable Isotope Production 
Facility to provide increased domestic capacity for production 
of critically needed enriched stable isotopes for research, 
defense, and industry, and reduce the Nation's dependence on 
foreign supplies. The Committee also recommends $3,200,000 for 
the Gamma-Ray Energy Tracking Array [GRETA], which will enable 
advanced, high resolution gamma ray detection capabilities for 
FRIB.
    The Committee further recommends $174,600,000 for 
operations at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, and optimal 
operations for the Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator 
Facility, the Argonne Tandem Linac Accelerator System, and the 
Brookhaven Linac Isotope Producer Facility.

           WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT FOR TEACHERS AND SCIENTISTS

    The Committee recommends $19,500,000 for Workforce 
Development for Teachers and Scientists.
    Within available funds, $8,300,000 is for the Science 
Undergraduate Laboratory Internship; $1,000,000 is for the 
Community College Institute of Science and Technology; 
$2,500,000 is for the Graduate Student Research Program; 
$1,700,000 is for the Visiting Faculty Program; $1,200,000 is 
for the Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship; 
$2,900,000 is for the National Science Bowl; $750,000 is for 
Technology Development and Online Application; $600,000 is for 
Evaluation Studies; $500,000 is for Outreach; and $50,000 is 
for the Laboratory Equipment Donation Program.

                  SCIENCE LABORATORIES INFRASTRUCTURE

    The Committee recommends $143,000,000 for Science 
Laboratories Infrastructure.
    Within these funds, the Committee recommends $26,000,000 
for nuclear operations at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. In 
future budget requests, the Committee directs the Office of 
Science to work with the Office of Nuclear Energy to 
demonstrate a commitment to operations and maintenance of 
nuclear facilities at Oak Ridge National Laboratory that 
support multiple critical missions.

               Advanced Research Projects Agency--Energy

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $306,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     -26,367,000
Committee recommendation................................     330,000,000

    The Committee recommends $330,000,000 for the Advanced 
Research Projects Agency--Energy [ARPA-E], an increase of 
$356,367,000 above the budget request. Within available funds, 
the Committee recommends $29,250,000 for program direction.
    ARPA-E was established by the America COMPETES Act of 2007 
following a recommendation by the National Academies of 
Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine in the ``Rising Above the 
Gathering Storm'' report. Since receiving its first funding in 
fiscal year 2009, ARPA-E continues to catalyze and support the 
development of transformational, high-impact energy 
technologies to ensure the Nation's economic and energy 
security and technological leadership. Project sponsors 
continue to form strategic partnerships and new companies, as 
well as secure private sector funding to help move ARPA-E 
technologies closer to the market.
    The budget request proposes to terminate ARPA-E and use 
funds appropriated in fiscal year 2017 for oversight and 
management. The Committee definitively rejects this short-
sighted proposal, and instead increases investment in this 
transformational program and directs the Department to continue 
to spend funds provided on research and development and program 
direction. The Department shall not use any appropriated funds 
to plan or execute the termination of ARPA-E. In addition, the 
Committee remains concerned about the timeliness of the current 
review process, and directs the Department to continue to move 
forward on approving Funding Opportunity Announcements.

              Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs

Appropriations, 2017....................................................
Budget estimate, 2018...................................................
Committee recommendation................................     $16,000,000

    The Committee recommends $16,000,000 for the Office of 
Indian Energy Policy and Programs. The activities of this 
office have previously been funded through Departmental 
Administration. The Committee encourages the Office of Indian 
Energy Policy and Programs to facilitate better communication 
among different Federal agencies regarding rules, regulations 
issued, and actions taken by other Federal agencies impacting 
energy development on Indian lands.

                  Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program

Appropriations, 2017....................................      $9,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................................
Committee recommendation................................       1,000,000

    The Committee recommends $1,000,000 for the Tribal Energy 
Loan Guarantee Program.

              Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program

                        ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

                          GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $37,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       2,000,000
Committee recommendation................................       2,000,000

                          OFFSETTING RECEIPTS

Appropriations, 2017....................................    -$30,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      -2,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      -2,000,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................      $7,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................................
Committee recommendation................................................

    The Committee recommends $2,000,000 in funding for the Loan 
Guarantee Program, the same as the request. This funding is 
offset by $2,000,000 in receipts from loan guarantee 
applicants, for a net appropriation of $0. An additional 
$15,000,000 in prior receipts from loan guarantee applicants is 
credited to the bill as a scorekeeping adjustment. Section 309 
of the General Provisions rescinds all remaining loan authority 
and subsidy cost except for $2,000,000,000 in fossil loan 
authority to accommodate the current conditional commitment.

        Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program

Appropriations, 2017....................................      $5,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       2,000,000
Committee recommendation................................       5,000,000

    The Committee recommends $5,000,000 for the Advanced 
Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program, an increase of 
$3,000,000 above the budget request.

                      Departmental Administration

                                (GROSS)

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $246,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     241,652,000
Committee recommendation................................     238,736,000

                        (MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES)

Appropriations, 2017....................................   -$103,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     -96,000,000
Committee recommendation................................     -96,000,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $143,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     145,652,000
Committee recommendation................................     142,736,000

    The Committee recommends $238,736,000 in funding for 
Departmental Administration including the Department's 
activities related to implementation of the Digital 
Accountability and Transparency Act. This funding is offset by 
$96,000,000 in revenue for a net appropriation of $142,736,000.
    The Committee has reduced the number of control points in 
this account in order to provide flexibility to the Department 
in its management and funding of its support functions. The 
Department is directed to continue to submit its budget request 
for this account in its current structure. The Other 
Departmental Administration activity includes Management, Chief 
Human Capital Officer, Chief Information Officer, Office of 
Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, General Counsel, 
Energy Policy and Systems Analysis, Technology Transitions 
International Affairs, Public Affairs, Economic Impact and 
Diversity, and Office of Energy Jobs Development. The Office of 
Indian Energy Programs is funded in a separate account.
    Compliance with State Laws.--The Committee directs the 
Department to submit a report, no later than 30 days after 
enactment of this act, detailing projects approved under 42 
U.S.C. 16421 and the Department's efforts to ensure compliance 
with State laws, as applicable under 42 U.S.C. 16421(d)(2).
    Nonprofit Cost Share.--The Committee notes that the 
Secretary may reduce or eliminate the research and development 
match requirement established in section 988 of the Energy 
Policy Act of 2005, where necessary and appropriate. The 
Committee encourages the Secretary to consider the use of this 
discretion if the research goals of the Department would be 
advanced by reducing or eliminating the match requirement for 
nonprofit organizations and institutions.
    Small Refinery Exemption.--Under section 211(o)(9)(B) of 
the Clean Air Act, a small refinery may petition the EPA 
Administrator for an exemption from the Renewable Fuel Standard 
[RFS] on the basis that the refinery experiences a 
disproportionate economic hardship under the RFS. When 
evaluating a petition, the Administrator consults with the 
Secretary of Energy to determine whether disproportionate 
economic hardship exists. According to the Department's March 
2011 Small Refinery Exemption Study, disproportionate economic 
hardship must encompass two broad components: a high cost of 
compliance relative to the industry average disproportionate 
impacts, and an effect sufficient to cause a significant 
impairment of the refinery operations' viability. If the 
Secretary finds that either of these two components exists, the 
Committee directs the Secretary to recommend to the EPA 
Administrator at least a 50-percent waiver of RFS requirements 
for the petitioner. The Committee also directs the Secretary to 
score all of the metrics in the study and to score the metrics 
according to the 2011 study scoring criteria and not any later 
addendum to the study. The Secretary is directed to seek small 
refinery comment before making changes to its scoring metrics 
for small refinery petitions for RFS waivers, and to notify the 
Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress prior 
to making any final changes to scoring metrics. Only the impact 
on the small refinery's transportation fuel margins is 
pertinent to measuring RFS impacts on relative refining 
margins. The Committee notes that the conference report 
accompanying the Energy and Water Development and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010, addressed similar issues and 
directed the Secretary to redo an earlier study done to 
evaluate whether the RFS program imposes a disproportionate 
economic hardship on small refineries. In calling for the 
Secretary to redo the study, the conference report cited the 
lack of small refinery input into the earlier study, concerns 
about regional RFS compliance cost disparities, small refinery 
dependence on the purchase of renewable fuel credits [RINs], 
and increasing RIN costs. Since then, the dramatic rise in RIN 
prices has amplified RFS compliance and competitive 
disparities, especially where unique regional factors exist, 
including high diesel demand production, no export access, and 
limited biodiesel infrastructure and production. In response to 
recent petitions in prior years, the Secretary determined that 
the RFS program would impose a disproportionate economic and 
structural impact on several small refineries. Despite this 
determination, the Secretary did not recommend, and EPA did not 
provide, any RFS relief because it determined the refineries 
were profitable enough to afford the cost of RFS compliance 
without substantially impacting their viability. The Committee 
reminds the Secretary that the RFS program may impose a 
disproportionate economic hardship on a small refinery even if 
the refinery makes enough profit to cover the cost of complying 
with the program. Small refinery profitability does not justify 
a disproportionate regulatory burden where Congress has 
explicitly given EPA authority, in consultation with the 
Secretary, to reduce or eliminate this burden.

                    Office of the Inspector General

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $44,424,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      49,000,000
Committee recommendation................................      49,000,000

    The Committee recommends $49,000,000 for the Office of the 
Inspector General, the same as the request.

                    ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES

                NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

    The Committee recommendation for the National Nuclear 
Security Administration [NNSA] continues funding for 
recapitalization of our nuclear weapons infrastructure, while 
modernizing and maintaining a safe, secure, and credible 
nuclear deterrent without testing. This is among our most 
important national security priorities.
    At the same time, the Committee supports continuing 
important efforts to secure and permanently eliminate remaining 
stockpiles of nuclear and radiological materials overseas and 
in the United States that can be used for nuclear or 
radiological weapons. In addition, the Committee supports Naval 
Reactors and the important role they play in enabling the 
Navy's nuclear fleet.

                     INTEGRATED UNIVERSITY PROGRAM

    The Committee directs the Secretary to carry out the 
requirements of 42 U.S.C. 16274a in support of university 
research and development in areas relevant to the NNSA's 
mission. Within available funds, the Committee recommends not 
less than $5,000,000 for the Integrated University Program to 
cultivate the next generation of leaders in nonproliferation, 
nuclear security, and international security. Together with 
funds from the Office of Nuclear Energy and the Nuclear 
Regulatory Commission, this program ensures highly qualified 
nuclear specialists will be available to meet national needs. 
The Committee directs the Secretary to request funding for this 
program in future budget years, and specifically highlight the 
source of funds within the budget request. Further, funding for 
this program shall not come from prior year funds.
    In addition to the Integrated University Program within 
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation, NNSA manages several 
university-related programs, ranging from fellowships and 
scholarships to university research. NNSA has not been able to 
provide a clear accounting of these various programs, and is 
directed to provide a report annually with the budget request 
that lists all of the university programs requested, the 
recommended funding level, and the value that program provides 
the NNSA.

                           PROJECT MANAGEMENT

    The Committee is concerned about NNSA's ability to properly 
estimate costs and timelines for large projects. The NNSA is 
encouraged to assess current performance on projects costing 
more than $750,000,000, and make appropriate project management 
changes. The Committee encourages the NNSA to identify problems 
in cost and schedule estimates early, and provide updated 
information to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses 
of Congress in a timely manner.

                           Weapons Activities

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $9,245,567,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................  10,239,344,000
Committee recommendation................................  10,000,071,000

    The Committee recommends $10,000,071,000 for Weapons 
Activities, a decrease of $239,273,000 below the budget 
request, to ensure the safety, security, reliability, and 
effectiveness of the Nation's nuclear weapons stockpile without 
the need for nuclear testing.

                        Directed Stockpile Work

    The Committee recommends $3,912,617,000 for Directed 
Stockpile Work.
    Life Extension Programs.--The Committee recommends 
$1,744,088,000 for Life Extension Programs [LEPs] and Major 
Alterations, which fully funds all LEPs and major alterations 
in the budget request, consistent with the plan of record 
approved by the Nuclear Weapons Council. NNSA needs to ensure 
that LEPs are completed on time and on budget to prevent impact 
on other high priorities, such as modernizing aging 
infrastructure, critical nonproliferation activities to combat 
nuclear terrorism, and naval nuclear propulsion.
    W76 Life Extension Program.--The Committee recommends 
$224,134,000 for the W76 LEP. Completing the W76 LEP, which 
makes up the largest share of the country's nuclear weapon 
deterrent on the most survivable leg of the Triad, is this 
Committee's highest priority for LEPs.
    B61 Life Extension Program.--The Committee recommends 
$788,572,000 for the B61 LEP. The Committee supports the 
Nuclear Weapons Council plan to retire the B83, the last 
megaton class weapon in the stockpile, by 2025.
    W88 Alt 370.--The Committee recommends $332,292,000 for the 
W88 Alt 370.
    W80-4 Life Extension Program.--The Committee recommends 
$399,090,000 for the W80-4 LEP.
    Weapons Dismantlement and Disposition.--The Committee 
recommends $56,000,000 for the dismantlement of retired nuclear 
weapons removed from the stockpile. Further, the Committee 
supports accelerated dismantlements now as a way of preparing 
its workforce for necessary stockpile production work beginning 
later this decade.
    Stockpile Systems.--The Committee recommends $475,000,000 
for stockpile systems. Funds are no longer controlled at the 
system level, but should continue to be reflected in the future 
budget requests at the system level.

           RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TECHNOLOGY, AND ENGINEERING

    The Committee recommends $1,963,962,000 for Research, 
Development, Technology, and Engineering.
    Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High-Yield 
Campaign.--The Committee recommends $544,934,000 for the 
inertial confinement fusion ignition and high-yield campaign. 
Within the amount provided, $344,000,000 shall be for inertial 
confinement fusion activities at the National Ignition 
Facility, $61,600,000 shall be for Sandia National Laboratory's 
Z facility, and $75,000,000 shall be for the University of 
Rochester's Omega facility.
    Within the Inertial Confinement Fusion program, the 
Committee is concerned that NNSA's contracting practices are 
leading to instability in the target design and fabrication 
vendor base. The Committee encourages NNSA to review all 
current and planned target supply contracts to ensure its 
actions support a robust, innovative and cost-effective target 
design and fabrication capability from multiple vendors, 
including small businesses.
    Advanced Simulation and Computing.--The Committee 
recommends $734,244,000 for advanced simulation and computing. 
Within these funds, the Committee recommends no less than 
$161,000,000 for activities associated with the exascale 
initiative, such as advanced system architecture design 
contracts with vendors and advanced weapons code development to 
effectively use new high performance computing platforms.
    Advanced Manufacturing Development.--The Committee 
recommends $85,540,000 for Advanced Manufacturing Development. 
Within the amount provided, $34,896,000 is recommended for 
Process Technology Development, including $5,000,000 above the 
budget request to modernize and upgrade legacy applications at 
weapons production facilities in order to improve manufacturing 
and safety.
    Stockpile Responsiveness Program.--The Committee 
recommendation supports the important goals of the Stockpile 
Responsiveness Program. The bill includes a provision that 
provides special reprogramming authority of up to $40,000,000 
for the Stockpile Responsiveness Program, subject to the 
Committee's normal notification guidelines.
    Engineering.--The Committee supports the request to begin 
recapitalization of the NNSA's trusted strategic 
microelectronics capability. However, the Committee urges NNSA 
to maintain focus on developing a cross-government approach to 
ensure that both NNSA and multiple customer needs are 
satisfied. No later than 90 after the date of enactment of this 
act, NNSA is directed to submit a report to the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress detailing the 
technical requirements for trusted microelectronics, an 
analysis of alternatives for meeting those requirements among 
public and private sector entities, and preliminary cost and 
schedule estimates for the various alternatives.
    Academic Alliances and Partnerships.--Within available 
funds, not less than $2,000,000 shall be for Tribal Colleges 
and Universities.

                     INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS

    The Committee recommends $2,722,137,000 for Infrastructure 
and Operations.
    Project 06-D-141, Uranium Processing Facility, Y-12, Oak 
Ridge, Tennessee.--The Committee recommends $663,000,000 to 
continue design and engineering work as well as site readiness 
and site preparation projects for the Uranium Processing 
Facility.
    The Committee supports efforts to replace existing enriched 
uranium capabilities currently residing in Building 9212 by 
2025 for not more than $6,500,000,000. The Committee supports 
the strategy of breaking the project into more manageable sub-
projects. This practice is specifically permitted by DOE Order 
413.3B, and is a practical approach for any project of this 
magnitude. The Committee expects the Secretary to ensure full 
compliance with the Department's requirement to have a design 
that is at least 90 percent complete before approving the start 
of construction for the nuclear facilities. The Committee 
understands that the NNSA must complete enough design work 
before it can set a performance baseline for each subproject, 
which includes an accurate cost and schedule for completion.

                        DEFENSE NUCLEAR SECURITY

    The Committee recommends $691,977,000 for Defense Nuclear 
Security, within which $5,000,000 is recommended to continue 
the design work for the West End Protected Area Reduction at Y-
12.

                    Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $1,902,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................   1,842,310,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,852,310,000

    The Committee recommends $1,852,310,000 for Defense Nuclear 
Nonproliferation, an increase of $10,000,000 above the budget 
request. To preserve and advance uranium and engineering 
expertise for purposes of national security and 
nonproliferation, the Committee encourages the ongoing 
collaboration between the Department's Office of Intelligence 
and the Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation program.
    Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation provides a vitally 
important component of our national security--preventing 
nuclear materials and weapons from falling into the wrong 
hands, including non-weapons nations, terrorist organizations 
and other non-state entities. This mission is challenged by an 
increasingly dangerous world with emerging and evolving 
threats, in addition to the proliferation of technologies that 
simplify production, manufacturing, and design of nuclear 
materials and weapons. The Committee recognizes the importance 
of bilateral and multilateral agreements and organizations in 
detecting, intercepting, and deterring nuclear and radiological 
threats. The Committee urges the full use of these partnerships 
to further strengthen U.S. and global security.
    Global Material Security.--The Committee recommends 
$357,108,000 for Global Material Security to increase the 
security of vulnerable stockpiles of nuclear weapons, weapons-
usable nuclear materials, and radiological materials and to 
improve partner countries' abilities to deter, detect, and 
interdict illicit trafficking.
    The Committee finds that unlike the materials needed for a 
nuclear weapon, which are located in fewer than 25 countries, 
the materials needed to build a dirty bomb can be found in 
thousands of hospitals, medical centers, research labs, and 
businesses in more than 150 countries. The most effective way 
to significantly reduce the threat of a radiological dispersal 
device, or dirty bomb, is, where feasible, to replace the 
radiological sources with safe, effective alternative 
technologies. For example, alternative x-ray technologies to 
replace cesium-137 blood irradiators are commercially 
available, offer equivalent medical outcomes, and have been 
approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. There are 
approximately 850 cesium blood and research irradiators in the 
United States, with over 500 being cesium blood irradiators. 
Therefore, within the funds provided, the Committee recommends 
not less than $20,000,000 for the Cesium Irradiator Replacement 
Program. Furthermore, the Secretary is directed to submit to 
the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of Congress no 
later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this act a 
report on the Cesium Irradiator Replacement Program, including 
a description of progress to date in reducing the use of 
cesium-137 based irradiation devices; identification of the 
universe of cesium-137 devices, including the number, general 
location, and user type; a prioritization scheme for 
replacement of devices; and estimated annual funding needs to 
replace all devices within 10 years through the existing 
voluntary, cost-shared program with devices users.
    Materials Management and Minimization.--Within Materials 
Management and Minimization, the Committee recommends 
$130,500,000 for Conversion, of which no less than $40,000,000 
shall be for the Molybdenum-99 [Moly-99] program. The Committee 
continues to place a high priority on the development of 
domestic supplies of the medical isotope Moly-99 on a schedule 
adequate to meet public health needs. The Committee notes the 
need for ongoing encouragement of private sector production of 
Moly-99 without the use of highly enriched uranium. New 
entrants to the program, particularly those utilizing existing 
infrastructure at the national laboratories or other 
facilities, should be encouraged. In addition, the Committee 
has followed closely the progress of current cooperative 
agreement awardees and notes that a number of first-of-a-kind 
regulatory and technological issues have delayed and increased 
the cost of these projects. Therefore, the Secretary is 
directed to provide up to $35,000,000 or 50 percent of total 
project cost, consistent with American Medical Isotope 
Production Act provisions, whichever is less, in cost sharing 
funds for cooperative agreement awardees or award new 
cooperative agreements that leverage existing resources within 
the Department. Lastly, the NNSA shall ensure that its 
financial contributions to projects are made on a timely basis 
commensurate with the private parties' expenditures. NNSA shall 
not delay payment of matching contributions simply to remain 
involved in the projects through completion.
    Nonproliferation and Arms Control.--The Committee 
recommends $124,703,000 for Nonproliferation and Arms Control 
activities. Within available amounts, the Committee recommends 
not less than $3,000,000 for international cooperation between 
governmental and non-governmental organizations at the national 
and sub-national levels to implement robust export control 
protocols.
    Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and 
Development.--The Committee recommends $436,095,000 for Defense 
Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development. The 
Committee supports a robust research and development capability 
to support nonproliferation initiatives. Proliferation of 
illicit nuclear materials and weapons continues to be a high-
consequence threat, and our ability to detect the production 
and movement of these materials is vitally important. Research 
and development in this area is especially important. The 
Committee recommendation also supports continued research and 
development of novel enrichment technologies to support 
nonproliferation goals, and recommends $2,000,000 for this 
purpose.
    MOX Construction.--The Committee recommends $270,000,000, 
and supports the budget request proposal to terminate the 
construction of the MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility as early as 
practicable. No funds are provided to continue construction of 
the MOX Fuel Fabrication facility.

                             Naval Reactors

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $1,419,813,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................   1,479,751,000
Committee recommendation................................   1,436,651,000

    The Committee recommends $1,436,651,000 for Naval Reactors, 
a decrease of $43,100,000 below the budget request. The 
Committee's recommendation fully funds important national 
priorities, including the Columbia-class replacement submarine 
design and the prototype refueling. Naval Reactors relies on 
high-enriched uranium from weapons that have been removed from 
the stockpile to fuel the Navy's aircraft carriers and 
submarines. The Committee directs Naval Reactors to provide a 
report to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress on the long-term sustainability of high-enriched 
uranium for Naval Reactor Propulsion for the Navy. The report 
shall include any impacts that may arise from changes to the 
shipbuilding plan under consideration and any outcomes of the 
Nuclear Posture Review. The report shall be provided within 60 
days after completion of the Nuclear Posture Review.

               COLUMBIA-CLASS REACTOR SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT

    The Committee recommends $156,700,000 for Columbia-Class 
Reactor Systems Development. Funds for this program were 
included last year as Ohio-Class Replacement Reactor Systems 
Development. Columbia-class submarines must be delivered on 
time to maintain our survivable deterrent. The Committee 
directs Naval Reactors to provide a report to the Committees on 
Appropriations of both Houses of Congress by February 1, 2018, 
that outlines key technical risks to delivering the lead 
submarine on time, and mitigation strategies for those risks. 
At a minimum, the report shall include qualification of the 
fuel design and any major components in the propulsion plant.

                       NAVAL REACTORS DEVELOPMENT

    The Committee recommends $461,267,000 for Naval Reactors 
Development. Within the funds provided, the Committee 
recommends $70,000,000 for the Advanced Test Reactor.
    Future Fuel Systems.--The Committee directs Naval Reactors 
to provide a report to the Committees on Appropriations of both 
Houses of Congress by June 1, 2018, on its plans to design 
improved fuel systems. The report shall include any planned 
efforts to design a low enriched uranium fuel system, including 
the linkage between any planned future fuel system and a Navy 
fleet requirement. The report shall also discuss planned needs 
and schedule for irradiation testing and post irradiation 
examination.

                              CONSTRUCTION

    The Committee recommends $117,700,000 for Construction. 
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $102,000,000 
for the Spent Fuel Handling Facility in Idaho and $15,000,000 
for the Fire System Upgrade at KAPL.

                     Federal Salaries And Expenses

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $390,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     418,595,000
Committee recommendation................................     396,000,000

    The Committee recommends $396,000,000, a decrease of 
$22,595,000 below the budget request.

                     Defense Environmental Cleanup

Appropriations, 2017....................................  $5,405,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................   5,537,186,000
Committee recommendation................................   5,579,968,000

    The Committee recommendation for Defense Environmental 
Cleanup is $5,579,968,000, an increase of $42,782,000 above the 
budget request. Within available funds, the Department is 
directed to fund the Hazardous Waste Worker Training Program.
    Future Budget Requests.--The Committee directs the 
Department to include out-year funding projections in the 
annual budget request for Environmental Management, and an 
estimate of the total cost and time to complete each site.
    Richland.--The Committee recognizes that significant 
progress has been made at the Hanford Site, including 984 
contaminated waste sites remediated, 18 million tons of 
contaminated soil and debris removed, 2,300 tons of spent 
nuclear fuel removed and placed in dry storage, 16 billion 
gallons of contaminated groundwater remediated, and 428 
facilities demolished. The Committee recommends $826,192,000 
for Richland Operations to continue critical cleanup work and 
ensure compliance with Tri-Party Agreement milestones. 
Additional funding is provided for cleanup of the 300-296 waste 
site, risk-reduction activities associated with legacy waste 
sites, K-West facility cleanup and deactivation, and community 
and regulatory support. Within available funds in the River 
Corridor control point, the Department is directed to carry out 
maintenance and public safety efforts at the B Reactor, the 
Manhattan Project National Historical Park, and the Hazardous 
Materials Management and Emergency Response facilities. 
Further, within available funds the Department is directed to 
work with contractors, labor, and the State of Washington to 
establish a resource center to provide education and advocacy 
to current and former Hanford employees on all available 
Federal and State compensation programs.
    NNSA Sites.--The Committee recommends $283,240,000 for NNSA 
sites. Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$217,529,000 for cleanup at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
    Oak Ridge Reservation.--The Committee recommends 
$275,219,000 for the Oak Ridge Reservation, including 
$10,000,000 to support preliminary design of a new landfill for 
the Oak Ridge Reservation. The existing on-site disposal 
facility is expected to reach capacity before all cleanup 
activities are completed. Planning for a new landfill is 
necessary to ensure that there is no interruption of cleanup 
activities. Within funds available for Cleanup and Waste 
Disposition, the Committee recommends $52,000,000 for 
continuing transuranic waste processing and storage to meet 
contractual and regulatory commitments.
    U-233 Disposition Program.--The Committee recommends 
$50,311,000 for the cleanup of Building 3019. Removal of legacy 
material from this building, an aging facility in the heart of 
the Oak Ridge National Laboratory central campus, must remain a 
high priority for the Department. Removal of the Uranium 233 
will enable the overall security posture at the laboratory to 
be relaxed, which will reduce costs and eliminate nuclear 
safety issues, and make the campus more conducive to 
collaborative science. The Committee encourages the Department 
to seek opportunities to expedite cleanup of Building 3019, 
including public private partnerships that may reduce the 
overall cost of cleanup.
    Mercury Treatment Facility.--The Committee recommends 
$17,100,000 for the Outfall 200 Mercury Treatment Facility. 
Remediation of mercury contamination at the Oak Ridge 
Reservation is an important precursor to full site remediation. 
Reducing the mercury being released into the East Fork of 
Poplar Creek continues to be a high priority for the 
Environmental Management program.
    Office of River Protection.--The Committee recommends 
$1,590,000,000 for the Office of River Protection. Funds above 
the budget request are provided to resume full engineering, 
procurement, and construction work on the High-Level Waste 
Treatment facility, to resolve the five remaining technical 
issues on the Pre-Treatment facility, to ensure compliance with 
the 2016 Consent Decree and Tri-Party Agreement milestones, and 
to continue tank waste retrievals.
    The Committee recognizes the Department's efforts to 
improve working conditions in the tank farms and address 
chemical vapor exposures by implementing recommendations from 
the 2014 Hanford Tank Vapor Assessment Report. The Committee is 
aware of three subsequent reviews conducted by the Department's 
Office of the Inspector General and Office of Enterprise 
Assessments, and the National Institute for Occupational Safety 
and Health. Within available funds in the Tank Farms Activities 
control point, the Department is directed to continue ongoing 
work to address chemical vapor exposures, implement 
recommendations from the three additional reviews, and maintain 
a safe work environment for Hanford employees.
    Savannah River Site.--The Committee recommends 
$1,260,000,000 for the Savannah River site. Within available 
funds, $3,000,000 is for disposition of spent fuel from the 
High Flux Isotope Reactor. The Committee is concerned there is 
a lack of coordination and consistency among the Office of 
Environmental Management, NNSA, and the Office of Management 
and Budget when planning for retiree pension payments at the 
Savannah River Site. The Department is directed to provide a 
report to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress with the fiscal year 2019 budget request that 
describes the assumptions made in determining the anticipated 
retiree pension payments, including the anticipated out-year 
costs for retiree pension payments. The report shall also 
include the Department's plan for ensuring the Savannah River 
Site out-year retiree pension obligations are met, including 
any proposed changes in the manner funding is projected or 
requested.
    Idaho.--The Committee recommends $350,226,000 for cleanup 
of Idaho National Laboratory. The Committee remains concerned 
about the lack of progress in starting operations at the 
Integrated Waste Treatment Unit. Completed in 2012 at a cost of 
$571,000,000, the facility is intended to treat 900,000 gallons 
of sodium-bearing radioactive waste. Unfortunately, design 
flaws and other problems have led to another $281,000,000 being 
spent without startup of the facility. Treating this waste is 
necessary for cleanup of the Idaho site and to meet regulatory 
commitments to the State.
    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.--The Committee recommends 
$300,971,000 for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant [WIPP]. Worker 
safety must continue to be a priority for the Department and 
its contractors, and the Committee encourages the Secretary to 
not prioritize waste emplacement schedules over safe operations 
and infrastructure improvements at the facility. The Committee 
recommends $10,000,000 above the budget request to address 
maintenance backlog issues. The restart of limited operations 
and the ongoing improvements to site infrastructure at the WIPP 
facility provide an opportunity to assess the status of current 
and future disposal requirements. The Committee directs the 
Secretary to submit to the Committees on Appropriations of both 
Houses of Congress not later than 90 days after the date of 
enactment of this act a long-term, consolidated plan for 
disposing of waste at WIPP. The plan shall include an analysis 
of the remaining capacity of WIPP under volumetric and 
radionuclide caps authorized under the Land Withdrawal Act. The 
plan shall also include an analysis of current and future waste 
streams that are eligible for disposal in WIPP and shall 
include steps to be taken to involve the state of New Mexico in 
any recommended changes.
    Excess Facilities.--The Committee supports efforts to 
address the backlog of excess, high-risk facilities in the 
nuclear weapons complex. The Committee recommends $55,000,000 
for this effort. Within available funds, $15,000,000 shall be 
for planning and permitting for cleanup of facilities at 
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and $40,000,000 shall be 
for cleanup of facilities at the Y-12 National Security 
Complex.
    Safeguards and Security.--The Committee recommends 
$304,102,000 for safeguards and security activities at cleanup 
sites, within which $43,342,000 is for cybersecurity 
activities.
    Technology Development and Demonstration.--The Committee 
recommends $25,000,000 for Technology Development and 
Demonstration. The Committee supports the Department's efforts 
to expand technology development and demonstration to address 
its long-term and technically complex cleanup challenges. 
Further, the Committee supports the Department's efforts to 
award merit-based research at the national laboratories to 
address long-term cleanup mission needs. The Committee believes 
it is in the best interest of all sites that these funds are 
competitively awarded and managed by Department of Energy 
Headquarters. Within the amount provided, no less than 
$5,000,000 shall be made available for work on qualification, 
testing and research to advance the state of the art on 
containment ventilation systems. Further, the Department is 
directed to take the necessary steps to implement and 
competitively award a cooperative university affiliated 
research center for that purpose. No new funds are provided for 
the National Spent Fuel Database. This effort should be funded 
within the Office of Nuclear Energy.

     Defense Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $563,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................................
Committee recommendation................................     788,000,000

    The Committee recommends $788,000,000 to fully offset the 
fiscal year 2018 appropriation for the Uranium Enrichment 
Decontamination and Decommissioning account.

                        Other Defense Activities

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $784,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     815,512,000
Committee recommendation................................     784,000,000

    The Committee recommends $784,000,000 for Other Defense 
Activities, a decrease of $31,512,000 from the budget request. 
Within available funds, the Committee recommends $238,170,000 
for Specialized Security Activities. Within the funds available 
for Environment, Health and Safety, the Committee recommends 
not less than $1,000,000 for the Epidemiologic Study of One 
Million U.S. Radiation Workers and Veterans, which was 
originally approved by the Office of Science in 2012.

                    POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS

    The Committee recognizes the important role the Power 
Marketing Administrations play in delivering affordable power, 
maintaining grid reliability, and supporting the Nation's 
Federal multipurpose water projects. The Department's proposal 
to divest the transmission assets of the Bonneville Power 
Administration, Southwestern Power Administration, and Western 
Area Power Administration could increase costs for millions of 
consumers, decrease grid reliability, and reduce services to 
rural communities. Further, the Committee notes the 
Department's proposal violates the Urgent Supplemental 
Appropriations Act, 1986 (Public Law 99-349) which prevents the 
use of any Federal funding by the executive branch to solicit 
proposals, prepare or review studies, or draft proposals 
designed to ``transfer out of Federal ownership, management or 
control in whole or in part the facilities and functions of the 
Federal power marketing administrations located within the 
contiguous 48 States, and the Tennessee Valley Authority'' 
unless explicitly authorized by an Act of Congress. Therefore, 
the Committee rejects the Department's proposal and directs the 
Department to fully comply with existing Federal law.
    In addition, there have been questions raised by the 
Congressional Budget Office and others as to whether the Power 
Marketing Administrations have the legal authority to execute 
the current receipt authority provided in this and prior year 
appropriations acts to create carryover of unobligated balances 
for purchase power and wheeling expenditures. The Committee 
includes a general provision requiring a report, using specific 
receipts data and legal authorities, to provide a detailed 
response to those questions. The Committee would like to 
provide the full budget request for purchase power and wheeling 
expenditures, but until the Committee receives information 
confirming these funds are being properly executed, the 
Committee will continue to be unable to do so.

     Operations and Maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $11,057,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      11,400,000
Committee recommendation................................      11,400,000

    The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $11,400,000 
for the Southwestern Power Administration.

Construction, Rehabilitation, Operations and Maintenance, Western Area 
                          Power Administration

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $95,581,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      93,372,000
Committee recommendation................................      93,372,000

    The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $93,372,000 
for the Western Area Power Administration.

           Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund

Appropriations, 2017....................................        $232,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................         228,000
Committee recommendation................................         228,000

    The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $228,000 
for the Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund.

                  Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $346,800,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     367,600,000
Committee recommendation................................     367,600,000

                            REVENUES APPLIED

Appropriations, 2017....................................   -$346,800,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................    -367,600,000
Committee recommendation................................    -367,600,000

    The Committee recommends a net appropriation of $0 for the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [FERC]. The Committee 
encourages FERC to prioritize meaningful opportunities for 
public engagement and coordination with State and local 
governments in the Federal permitting and review processes of 
energy infrastructure proposals. Specifically, FERC is 
encouraged to remain transparent and consistent, and ensure the 
health, safety, and security of the environment of each 
affected community.

                                                                  DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
                                                                [In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Committee recommendation
                                                                                                          Committee               compared to--
                                                                         Enacted      Budget estimate   recommendation ---------------------------------
                                                                                                                            Enacted      Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          ENERGY PROGRAMS
 
               ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
 
Sustainable Transportation:
    Vehicle technologies...........................................         306,959           82,000          277,988          -28,971         +195,988
    Bioenergy technologies.........................................         205,000           56,600          190,000          -15,000         +133,400
    Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies............................         101,000           45,000           85,000          -16,000          +40,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Sustainable Transportation.........................         612,959          183,600          552,988          -59,971         +369,388
 
Renewable Energy:
    Solar energy...................................................         207,600           69,700          167,500          -40,100          +97,800
    Wind energy....................................................          90,000           31,700           72,500          -17,500          +40,800
    Water power....................................................          84,000           20,400           82,000           -2,000          +61,600
    Geothermal technologies........................................          69,500           12,500           67,500           -2,000          +55,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Renewable Energy...................................         451,100          134,300          389,500          -61,600         +255,200
 
Energy Efficiency:
    Advanced manufacturing.........................................         257,500           82,000          252,000           -5,500         +170,000
    Building technologies..........................................         199,141           67,500          195,000           -4,141         +127,500
    Federal energy management program..............................          27,000           10,000           25,000           -2,000          +15,000
    Weatherization and intergovernmental:
        Weatherization:
            Weatherization assistance grants.......................         225,000   ...............         212,000          -13,000         +212,000
            Training and technical assistance......................           3,000   ...............           3,000   ...............          +3,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Weatherization assistance program..........         228,000   ...............         215,000          -13,000         +215,000
 
    State energy program grants....................................          50,000   ...............          50,000   ...............         +50,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Weatherization and intergovernmental program.......         278,000   ...............         265,000          -13,000         +265,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Energy Efficiency..................................         761,641          159,500          737,000          -24,641         +577,500
 
Corporate Support:
    Facilities and infrastructure:
        National Renewable Energy Laboratory [NREL]................          92,000           92,000           92,000   ...............  ...............
    Program direction..............................................         153,500          125,849          153,500   ...............         +27,651
    Strategic programs.............................................          19,000   ...............          12,000           -7,000          +12,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Corporate Support..................................         264,500          217,849          257,500           -7,000          +39,651
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Energy efficiency and renewable energy.............       2,090,200          695,249        1,936,988         -153,212       +1,241,739
 
Use of Prior Year Balances.........................................  ...............         -59,100   ...............  ...............         +59,100
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, ENERGY EFFICENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY.................       2,090,200          636,149        1,936,988         -153,212       +1,300,839
                                                                    ====================================================================================
            ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY
 
Research and development:
    Transmission Reliability.......................................          36,000           13,000           36,000   ...............         +23,000
    Resilient Distribution Systems.................................          50,000           10,000           35,000          -15,000          +25,000
    Cyber security for energy delivery systems.....................          62,000           42,000           53,000           -9,000          +11,000
    Energy storage.................................................          31,000            8,000           37,141           +6,141          +29,141
    Transformer resilience and advanced components.................           6,000            5,000            7,000           +1,000           +2,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................         185,000           78,000          168,141          -16,859          +90,141
 
Transmission Permitting and Technical Assistance...................           7,500            6,000            6,000           -1,500   ...............
Infrastructure security and energy restoration.....................           9,000            9,000           12,000           +3,000           +3,000
Program direction..................................................          28,500           27,000           27,000           -1,500   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability........         230,000          120,000          213,141          -16,859          +93,141
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, ELECTRICITY DELIVERY AND ENERGY RELIABILITY...........         230,000          120,000          213,141          -16,859          +93,141
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                           NUCLEAR ENERGY
 
Research and development:
    Integrated university program..................................           5,000   ...............           5,000   ...............          +5,000
    STEP R&D.......................................................           5,000   ...............  ...............          -5,000   ...............
    Small modular reactor licensing technical support..............          95,000   ...............  ...............         -95,000   ...............
    Nuclear energy enabling technologies...........................         115,100          105,360          120,600           +5,500          +15,240
    Reactor concepts RD&D..........................................         132,000           94,000          132,000   ...............         +38,000
    Fuel cycle research and development............................         207,500           88,500          213,500           +6,000         +125,000
    International nuclear energy cooperation.......................           3,000            2,500            2,500             -500   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................         562,600          290,360          473,600          -89,000         +183,240
 
Infrastructure:
    Radiological facilities management:
        Space and defense infrastructure...........................          10,000   ...............          15,000           +5,000          +15,000
        Research reactor infrastructure............................           7,000            9,000            9,000           +2,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal.................................................          17,000            9,000           24,000           +7,000          +15,000
 
    INL facilities management:
        INL operations and infrastructure..........................         231,713          198,140          210,202          -21,511          +12,062
        Construction:
            16-E-200 Sample preparation laboratory.................           6,000            6,000            6,000   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, INL facilities management..................         237,713          204,140          216,202          -21,511          +12,062
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Subtotal, Infrastructure.............................         254,713          213,140          240,202          -14,511          +27,062
 
Idaho sitewide safeguards and security.............................         129,303          133,000          129,000             -303           -4,000
Program direction..................................................          80,000           66,500           74,218           -5,782           +7,718
Use of prior year balances.........................................         -10,000   ...............  ...............         +10,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NUCLEAR ENERGY........................................       1,016,616          703,000          917,020          -99,596         +214,020
                                                                    ====================================================================================
               FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
 
Coal CCS and power systems:
    Carbon capture.................................................         101,000           16,000           93,930           -7,070          +77,930
    Carbon storage.................................................          95,300           15,000           88,629           -6,671          +73,629
    Advanced energy systems........................................         105,000           46,000           97,650           -7,350          +51,650
    Cross cutting research.........................................          45,500           37,800           42,315           -3,185           +4,515
    NETL coal research and development.............................          53,000           50,000   ...............         -53,000          -50,000
    STEP (Supercritical CO2).......................................          24,000   ...............          19,530           -4,470          +19,530
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Coal CCS and power systems.........................         423,800          164,800          342,054          -81,746         +177,254
 
Natural Gas Technologies:
    Research.......................................................          43,000            5,500           45,018           +2,018          +39,518
Unconventional fossil energy technologies from petroleum--oil                21,000           15,000           26,319           +5,319          +11,319
 technologies......................................................
Program direction..................................................          60,000           65,205           57,000           -3,000           -8,205
Special recruitment programs.......................................             700              200              200             -500   ...............
NETL Research and Development......................................          43,000           44,577           72,663          +29,663          +28,086
NETL Infrastructure and Operations.................................          40,500           39,896           58,683          +18,183          +18,787
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Fossil Energy Research and Development.............         632,000          335,178          601,937          -30,063         +266,759
 
Fossil proviso.....................................................          50,000   ...............  ...............         -50,000   ...............
Use of prior year balances.........................................         -14,000          -55,178          -29,236          -15,236          +25,942
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, FOSSIL ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT................         668,000          280,000          572,701          -95,299         +292,701
                                                                    ====================================================================================
NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES.............................          14,950           20,200           20,200           +5,250   ...............
Use of prior year balances.........................................  ...............         -15,300          -15,300          -15,300   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NAVAL PETROLEUM AND OIL SHALE RESERVES................          14,950            4,900            4,900          -10,050   ...............
 
                    STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE
 
STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE........................................         223,000          180,000          180,000          -43,000   ...............
Sale of crude oil..................................................        -340,000         -350,000         -350,000          -10,000   ...............
Use of sale proceeds...............................................         340,000          350,000          350,000          +10,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE...........................         223,000          180,000          180,000          -43,000   ...............
 
                       SPR PETROLEUM ACCOUNT
 
SPR Petroleum Account..............................................  ...............          11,400   ...............  ...............         -11,400
Use of prior year balances.........................................  ...............          -3,000   ...............  ...............          +3,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SPR PETROLEUM ACCOUNT.................................  ...............           8,400   ...............  ...............          -8,400
 
                 NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE
 
NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE.................................          10,500           10,000           10,000             -500   ...............
Use of prior year balances.........................................          -4,000           -3,500           -3,500             +500   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NORTHEAST HOME HEATING OIL RESERVE....................           6,500            6,500            6,500   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION..................................         122,000          118,000          122,000   ...............          +4,000
 
                 NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
 
Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (WA)...............................           2,240            2,240            2,240   ...............  ...............
Gaseous Diffusion Plants...........................................         101,304          100,575          101,304   ...............            +729
Small sites........................................................          77,043           55,000           87,456          +10,413          +32,456
West Valley Demonstration Project..................................          66,413           60,585           75,000           +8,587          +14,415
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NON-DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.....................         247,000          218,400          266,000          +19,000          +47,600
                                                                    ====================================================================================
     URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATIONAND DECOMMISSIONING FUND
 
Oak Ridge..........................................................         194,673          145,726          194,673   ...............         +48,947
 
Paducah:
    Nuclear facility D&D, Paducah..................................         205,530          202,958          205,530   ...............          +2,572
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Paducah...............................................         205,530          202,958          205,530   ...............          +2,572
 
Portsmouth:
    Nuclear facility D&D, Portsmouth...............................         274,000          312,389          312,389          +38,389   ...............
    Construction:
        15-U-408 On-site waste disposal facility, Portsmouth.......          41,168           38,882           38,882           -2,286   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Portsmouth............................................         315,168          351,271          351,271          +36,103   ...............
 
Pension and community and regulatory support.......................          22,953           22,794           22,794             -159   ...............
Title X uranium/thorium reimbursement program......................          30,000           30,000           13,732          -16,268          -16,268
Use of prior year balances.........................................            -324   ...............  ...............            +324   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, UED&D FUND............................................         768,000          752,749          788,000          +20,000          +35,251
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                              SCIENCE
 
Advanced scientific computing research.............................         483,000          525,430          579,000          +96,000          +53,570
    Construction:
    17-SC-20 SC Exascale Computing Project.........................         164,000          196,580          184,000          +20,000          -12,580
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Advanced scientific computing research.............         647,000          722,010          763,000         +116,000          +40,990
 
Basic energy sciences:
    Research.......................................................       1,681,500        1,352,400        1,641,300          -40,200         +288,900
    Construction:
        13-SC-10 LINAC coherent light source II, SLAC..............         190,000          182,100          200,000          +10,000          +17,900
        18-SC-10 APS Upgrade, ANL..................................  ...............          20,000           93,000          +93,000          +73,000
        18-SC-11 Spallation Newtron Source Proton Power Upgrade      ...............  ...............          26,000          +26,000          +26,000
         (PPU), ORNL...............................................
        18-SC-12 Advanced Light Soures Upgrade (ALS-U), LBNL.......  ...............  ...............          20,000          +20,000          +20,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction...................................         190,000          202,100          339,000         +149,000         +136,900
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Basic energy sciences..........................       1,871,500        1,554,500        1,980,300         +108,800         +425,800
 
Biological and environmental research..............................         612,000          348,950          633,000          +21,000         +284,050
 
Fusion energy sciences:
    Research.......................................................         330,000          246,940          232,000          -98,000          -14,940
    Construction:
        14-SC-60 ITER..............................................          50,000           63,000   ...............         -50,000          -63,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Fusion energy sciences.............................         380,000          309,940          232,000         -148,000          -77,940
 
High energy physics:
    Research.......................................................         731,500          573,400          733,600           +2,100         +160,200
    Construction:
        11-SC-40 Long baseline neutrino facility / deep underground          50,000           54,900           82,000          +32,000          +27,100
         neutrino experiment, FNAL.................................
        11-SC-41 Muon to electron conversion experiment, FNAL......          43,500           44,400           44,400             +900   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction...................................          93,500           99,300          126,400          +32,900          +27,100
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, High energy physics............................         825,000          672,700          860,000          +35,000         +187,300
 
Nuclear physics:
    Operations and maintenance.....................................         522,000          422,700          542,000          +20,000         +119,300
    Construction:
        14-SC-50 Facility for rare isotope beams, Michigan State            100,000           80,000           97,200           -2,800          +17,200
         University................................................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Nuclear physics................................         622,000          502,700          639,200          +17,200         +136,500
 
Workforce development for teachers and scientists..................          19,500           14,000           19,500   ...............          +5,500
 
Science laboratories infrastructure:
    Infrastructure support:
        Payment in lieu of taxes...................................           1,764            1,713            1,713              -51   ...............
        Oak Ridge landlord.........................................           6,182            6,082            6,082             -100   ...............
        Facilities and infrastructure..............................          32,603            5,105           32,855             +252          +27,750
        Oak Ridge nuclear operations...............................          26,000           10,000           26,000   ...............         +16,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Infrastructure support.........................          66,549           22,900           66,650             +101          +43,750
 
    Construction:
        18-SC-71 Energy Science Capability, PNNL...................  ...............           1,000            6,000           +6,000           +5,000
        17-SC-71 Integrated Engineering Research Center, FNAL......           2,500            1,500            2,500   ...............          +1,000
        17 SC-73 Core Facility Revitalization, BNL.................           1,800            1,500            5,000           +3,200           +3,500
        15-SC-78 Integrative genomics building, LBNL...............          19,561           24,800           38,350          +18,789          +13,550
        15-SC-77 Photon science laboratory building, SLAC..........          20,000   ...............  ...............         -20,000   ...............
        15-SC-76 Materials design laboratory, ANL..................          19,590           24,500           24,500           +4,910   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal.................................................          63,451           53,300           76,350          +12,899          +23,050
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Science laboratories infrastructure............         130,000           76,200          143,000          +13,000          +66,800
 
Safeguards and security............................................         103,000          103,000          103,000   ...............  ...............
Science program direction..........................................         182,000          168,516          177,000           -5,000           +8,484
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Science............................................       5,392,000        4,472,516        5,550,000         +158,000       +1,077,484
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SCIENCE...............................................       5,392,000        4,472,516        5,550,000         +158,000       +1,077,484
                                                                    ====================================================================================
NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL.............................................  ...............          90,000   ...............  ...............         -90,000
 
              ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY-ENERGY
 
ARPA-E projects....................................................         276,750   ...............         300,750          +24,000         +300,750
Program direction..................................................          29,250           65,000           29,250   ...............         -35,750
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, ARPA-E.............................................         306,000           65,000          330,000          +24,000         +265,000
 
Use of prior year balances.........................................  ...............         -45,000   ...............  ...............         +45,000
Rescission.........................................................  ...............         -46,367   ...............  ...............         +46,367
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, ARPA-E................................................         306,000          -26,367          330,000          +24,000         +356,367
 
            OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS
 
Program direction..................................................  ...............  ...............           4,800           +4,800           +4,800
Indian energy policy and programs..................................  ...............  ...............          11,200          +11,200          +11,200
      TOTAL, OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY POLICY AND PROGRAMS...........  ...............  ...............          16,000          +16,000          +16,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
         TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE PGM
 
Administrative expenses............................................          37,000            2,000            2,000          -35,000   ...............
Offsetting collection..............................................         -30,000           -2,000           -2,000          +28,000   ...............
Rescission.........................................................  ...............        -250,000   ...............  ...............        +250,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, TITLE 17--INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM           7,000         -250,000   ...............          -7,000         +250,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
        ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN PGM
 
Administrative expenses............................................           5,000            2,000            5,000   ...............          +3,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY VEHICLES MANUFACTURING LOAN                  5,000            2,000            5,000   ...............          +3,000
       PROGRAM.....................................................
 
TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM...............................           9,000   ...............           1,000           -8,000           +1,000
Rescission.........................................................          -9,000   ...............  ...............          +9,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, TRIBAL ENERGY LOAN GUARANTEE PROGRAM..................  ...............  ...............           1,000           +1,000           +1,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                    DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION
 
Administrative operations:
    Salaries and expenses:
        Office of the Secretary:
        Program direction..........................................           5,089            5,300            5,300             +211   ...............
        Chief Financial Officer....................................          49,242           48,484           48,484             -758   ...............
        Chief Information Officer..................................          74,492           91,443   ...............         -74,492          -91,443
        Office of Indian energy policy and programs................          16,000           10,000   ...............         -16,000          -10,000
        Congressional and intergovernmental affairs................           6,200            6,200            6,200   ...............  ...............
        Economic impact and diversity..............................          10,169           10,000   ...............         -10,169          -10,000
        Other Departmental Administration..........................         185,134          173,225          258,468          +73,334          +85,243
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Salaries and expenses..........................         346,326          344,652          318,452          -27,874          -26,200
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Administrative operations......................         346,326          344,652          318,452          -27,874          -26,200
 
    Strategic partnership projects.................................          40,000           40,000           40,000   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Departmental administration........................         386,326          384,652          358,452          -27,874          -26,200
 
Use of prior-year balances.........................................         -20,610   ...............  ...............         +20,610   ...............
Funding from other defense activities..............................        -119,716         -143,000         -119,716   ...............         +23,284
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Departmental administration (gross)...................         246,000          241,652          238,736           -7,264           -2,916
 
Miscellaneous revenues.............................................        -103,000          -96,000          -96,000           +7,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, DEPARTMENTAL ADMINISTRATION (net).....................         143,000          145,652          142,736             -264           -2,916
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                  OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
 
Office of the inspector general....................................          44,424           49,000           49,000           +4,576   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.......................          44,424           49,000           49,000           +4,576   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, ENERGY PROGRAMS.......................................      11,283,690        7,510,899       11,100,986         -182,704       +3,590,087
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                  ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
 
              NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
 
                         WEAPONS ACTIVITIES
 
Directed stockpile work:
    B61 Life extension program.....................................         616,079          788,572          788,572         +172,493   ...............
    W76 Life extension program.....................................         222,880          224,134          224,134           +1,254   ...............
    W88 Alteration program.........................................         281,129          332,292          332,292          +51,163   ...............
    W80-4 Life extension program...................................         220,253          399,090          399,090         +178,837   ...............
    Stockpile systems..............................................  ...............  ...............         475,000         +475,000         +475,000
        B61 Stockpile systems......................................          57,313           59,729   ...............         -57,313          -59,729
        W76 Stockpile systems......................................          38,604           51,400   ...............         -38,604          -51,400
        W78 Stockpile systems......................................          56,413           60,100   ...............         -56,413          -60,100
        W80 Stockpile systems......................................          64,631           80,087   ...............         -64,631          -80,087
        B83 Stockpile systems......................................          41,659           35,762   ...............         -41,659          -35,762
        W87 Stockpile systems......................................          81,982           83,200   ...............         -81,982          -83,200
        W88 Stockpile systems......................................         103,074          131,576   ...............        -103,074         -131,576
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal.................................................         443,676          501,854          475,000          +31,324          -26,854
 
    Weapons dismantlement and disposition..........................          56,000           52,000           56,000   ...............          +4,000
    Stockpile services:
        Production support.........................................         447,527          470,400          470,400          +22,873   ...............
        Research and Development support...........................          34,187           31,150           31,150           -3,037   ...............
        R and D certification and safety...........................         156,481          196,840          180,000          +23,519          -16,840
        Management, technology, and production.....................         251,978          285,400          285,400          +33,422   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal.................................................         890,173          983,790          966,950          +76,777          -16,840
 
    Strategic materials:
        Uranium sustainment........................................          20,988           20,579           20,579             -409   ...............
        Plutonium sustainment......................................         184,970          210,367          200,000          +15,030          -10,367
        Tritium sustainment........................................         109,787          198,152          190,000          +80,213           -8,152
        Domestic uranium enrichment................................          50,000           60,000           60,000          +10,000   ...............
        Strategic materials sustainment............................         212,092          206,196          200,000          -12,092           -6,196
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................         577,837          695,294          670,579          +92,742          -24,715
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Directed stockpile work............................       3,308,027        3,977,026        3,912,617         +604,590          -64,409
 
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E):
    Science:
        Advanced certification.....................................          60,000           57,710           57,710           -2,290   ...............
        Primary assessment technologies............................          99,000           89,313           89,313           -9,687   ...............
        Dynamic materials properties...............................         106,000          122,347          110,000           +4,000          -12,347
        Advanced radiography.......................................          45,700           37,600           37,600           -8,100   ...............
        Secondary assessment technologies..........................          76,000           76,833           76,833             +833   ...............
        Academic alliances and partnerships........................          49,800           52,963           40,000           -9,800          -12,963
        Enhanced capabilities for subcritical experiments..........  ...............          50,755           40,105          +40,105          -10,650
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal.................................................         436,500          487,521          451,561          +15,061          -35,960
 
    Engineering:
        Enhanced surety............................................          37,196           39,717           37,196   ...............          -2,521
        Weapons system engineering assessment technology...........          16,958           23,029           23,029           +6,071   ...............
        Nuclear survivability......................................          36,100           45,230           45,230           +9,130   ...............
        Enhanced surveillance......................................          42,228           45,147           42,228   ...............          -2,919
        Stockpile responsiveness...................................  ...............          40,000   ...............  ...............         -40,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal.................................................         132,482          193,123          147,683          +15,201          -45,440
 
    Inertial confinement fusion ignition and high yield:
        Ignition...................................................          77,932           79,575           79,575           +1,643   ...............
        Support of other stockpile programs........................          23,363           23,565           23,565             +202   ...............
        Diagnostics, cryogenics and experimental support...........          64,196           77,915           77,915          +13,719   ...............
        Pulsed power inertial confinement fusion...................           5,616            7,596            7,596           +1,980   ...............
        Joint program in high energy density laboratory plasmas....           9,492            9,492            9,492   ...............  ...............
        Facility operations and target production..................         342,360          334,791          346,791           +4,431          +12,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal.................................................         522,959          532,934          544,934          +21,975          +12,000
 
    Advanced simulation and computing..............................         663,184          709,244          709,244          +46,060   ...............
 
Construction:
    18-D-670 Exascale class computer cooling equipment, LLNL.......  ...............          22,000           22,000          +22,000   ...............
    18-D-620 Exascale computing facility modernization project.....  ...............           3,000            3,000           +3,000   ...............
 
Advanced manufacturing development:
    Additive manfacturing..........................................          12,000           12,000           12,000   ...............  ...............
    Component manufacturing development............................          46,583           38,644           38,644           -7,939   ...............
    Process technology development.................................          28,522           29,896           34,896           +6,374           +5,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................          87,105           80,540           85,540           -1,565           +5,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, RDT&E..............................................       1,842,230        2,028,362        1,963,962         +121,732          -64,400
 
Infrastructure and Operations (formerly RTBF):
    Operations of facilities.......................................         824,000          868,000          824,000   ...............         -44,000
    Safety and environmental operations............................         110,000          116,000          110,000   ...............          -6,000
    Maintenance and repair of facilities...........................         324,000          360,000          324,000   ...............         -36,000
 
Recapitalization:
    Infrastructure and safety......................................         430,509          312,492          312,492         -118,017   ...............
    Capability based investments...................................         112,639          114,850          114,850           +2,211   ...............
    Bannister federal complex disposition..........................         200,000   ...............  ...............        -200,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Recapitalization...................................         743,148          427,342          427,342         -315,806   ...............
 
    Construction:
        18-D-650 Material staging facility, PX.....................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
        18-D-660 Fire station, Y-12................................  ...............          28,000           28,000          +28,000   ...............
        18-D-620 Lithium production capability.....................  ...............  ...............           5,000           +5,000           +5,000
        18-D-650 Tritium production capability, SRS................  ...............           6,800            6,800           +6,800   ...............
        17-D-125 RLUOB reconfiguration project, LANL...............           1,000   ...............  ...............          -1,000   ...............
        17-D-126 PF-4 reconfiguration project, LANL................           8,000   ...............  ...............          -8,000   ...............
        17-D-640 U1a complex enhancements project, NNSA............          11,500           22,100           22,100          +10,600   ...............
        17-D-630 Electrical distribution system, LLNL..............          25,000            6,000            6,000          -19,000   ...............
        16-D-515 Albuquerque Complex project.......................          15,047           98,000           98,000          +82,953   ...............
        15-D-613 Emergency Operations Center, Y-12.................           2,000            7,000            7,000           +5,000   ...............
        15-D-302 TA-55 Reinvestment project III, LANL..............           2,000   ...............  ...............          -2,000   ...............
        07-D-220 Radioactive liquid waste treatment facility, LANL.  ...............           2,100            2,100           +2,100   ...............
        07-O-220-04 TRU liquid waste facility, LANL................          17,053           17,895           17,895             +842   ...............
        06-D-141 Uranium Processing Facility, Y-12.................         575,000          663,000          663,000          +88,000   ...............
    Chemistry and metallurgy replacement (CMRR):
        04-D-125 Chemistry and metallurgy replacement project, LANL  ...............         180,900          180,900         +180,900   ...............
        04-D-125-04 RLUOB equipment installation, phase 2..........          75,000   ...............  ...............         -75,000   ...............
        04-D-125-05 PF-4 equipment installation....................          75,615   ...............  ...............         -75,615   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, CMRR...........................................         150,615          180,900          180,900          +30,285   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction...................................         807,215        1,031,795        1,036,795         +229,580           +5,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Infrastructure and Operations......................       2,808,363        2,803,137        2,722,137          -86,226          -81,000
 
Secure transportation asset:
    Operations and equipment.......................................         151,771          219,464          185,000          +33,229          -34,464
    Program direction..............................................          97,118          105,600          105,600           +8,482   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Secure transportation asset........................         248,889          325,064          290,600          +41,711          -34,464
 
Defense nuclear security:
    Defense nuclear security.......................................         670,000          686,977          686,977          +16,977   ...............
    Security improvements program..................................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
    Construction:
        17-D-710 West end protected area reduction project, Y-12...           2,500   ...............           5,000           +2,500           +5,000
        14-D-710 Device assembly facility argus installation                 13,000   ...............  ...............         -13,000   ...............
         project, NV...............................................
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Defense nuclear security.......................         685,500          686,977          691,977           +6,477           +5,000
 
Information technology and cyber security..........................         176,592          186,728          186,728          +10,136   ...............
Legacy contractor pensions.........................................         248,492          232,050          232,050          -16,442   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Weapons Activities.................................       9,318,093       10,239,344       10,000,071         +681,978         -239,273
 
Rescission.........................................................         -64,126   ...............  ...............         +64,126   ...............
Budget amendment rescission........................................          -8,400   ...............  ...............          +8,400   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, WEAPONS ACTIVITIES....................................       9,245,567       10,239,344       10,000,071         +754,504         -239,273
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                  DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION
 
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Programs:
 
Global material security:
    International nuclear security.................................          66,027           46,339           46,339          -19,688   ...............
    Domestic radiologic security...................................          87,199           85,764           97,433          +10,234          +11,669
    International radiologic security..............................          68,907           60,576           68,907   ...............          +8,331
    Nuclear smuggling detection....................................         144,975          144,429          144,429             -546   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Global material security...........................         367,108          337,108          357,108          -10,000          +20,000
 
Material management and minimization:
    Conversion.....................................................          75,615          125,500          130,500          +54,885           +5,000
    Nuclear material removal.......................................          68,902           32,925           32,925          -35,977   ...............
    Material disposition...........................................         143,833          173,669          173,669          +29,836   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Material management and minimization...............         288,350          332,094          337,094          +48,744           +5,000
 
Nonproliferation and arms control..................................         124,703          129,703          124,703   ...............          -5,000
 
Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D:
    Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D...........................         469,750          446,095          436,095          -33,655          -10,000
    Proliferation detection........................................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
    Nuclear detonation detection...................................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
    LEU fuels development..........................................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Defense nuclear nonproliferation R&D...............         469,750          446,095          436,095          -33,655          -10,000
 
Nonproliferation construction:
        99-D-143 Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility, SRS..         335,000          270,000          270,000          -65,000   ...............
        18-D-150 Surplus plutonium disposition project, SRS........  ...............           9,000            9,000           +9,000   ...............
        18-D-150 Plutonium removal project, SRS....................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Nonproliferation construction..................         335,000          279,000          279,000          -56,000   ...............
 
Legacy contractor pensions.........................................          83,208           40,950           40,950          -42,258   ...............
Nuclear counterterrorism and incident response.....................         271,881          277,360          277,360           +5,479   ...............
Use of prior-year balances.........................................         -38,000   ...............  ...............         +38,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation...................       1,902,000        1,842,310        1,852,310          -49,690          +10,000
 
Rescission.........................................................         -19,128          -49,000   ...............         +19,128          +49,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, DEFENSE NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION......................       1,882,872        1,793,310        1,852,310          -30,562          +59,000
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                           NAVAL REACTORS
 
Naval reactors development.........................................         440,338          473,267          461,267          +20,929          -12,000
Columbia-class reactor systems development.........................         213,700          156,700          156,700          -57,000   ...............
S8G Prototype refueling............................................         124,000          190,000          190,000          +66,000   ...............
Naval reactors operations and infrastructure.......................         449,682          466,884          466,884          +17,202   ...............
 
Construction:
    17-D-911 BL Fire System Upgrade................................           1,400   ...............  ...............          -1,400   ...............
    15-D-904 NRF Overpack Storage Expansion 3......................             700           13,700              700   ...............         -13,000
    15-D-903 KL Fire System Upgrade................................  ...............          15,000           15,000          +15,000   ...............
    15-D-902 KS Engineroom team trainer facility...................          33,300   ...............  ...............         -33,300   ...............
    14-D-901 Spent fuel handling recapitalization project, NRF.....         100,000          116,000          102,000           +2,000          -14,000
    10-D-903 Security upgrades, KAPL...............................          12,900   ...............  ...............         -12,900   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Construction.......................................         148,300          144,700          117,700          -30,600          -27,000
 
Program direction..................................................          44,100           48,200           44,100   ...............          -4,100
Rescission.........................................................            -307   ...............  ...............            +307   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NAVAL REACTORS........................................       1,419,813        1,479,751        1,436,651          +16,838          -43,100
                                                                    ====================================================================================
FEDERAL SALARIES AND EXPENSES......................................         390,000          418,595          396,000           +6,000          -22,595
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, FEDERAL SALARIES AND EXPENSES.........................         390,000          418,595          396,000           +6,000          -22,595
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, NATIONAL NUCLEAR SECURITY ADMINISTRATION..............      12,938,252       13,931,000       13,685,032         +746,780         -245,968
                                                                    ====================================================================================
 
                   DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP
 
Closure sites administration.......................................           9,389            4,889            4,889           -4,500   ...............
 
Richland:
    River corridor and other cleanup operations....................         143,755           58,692          163,692          +19,937         +105,000
    Central plateau remediation....................................         659,818          637,879          637,879          -21,939   ...............
    RL Community and regulatory support............................          24,701            5,121           10,121          -14,580           +5,000
    RL Safeguards and security.....................................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
    Construction:
        18-D-404 WESF Modifications and capsule storage............  ...............           6,500            6,500           +6,500   ...............
        15-D-401 Containerized sludge removal annex, RL............          11,486            8,000            8,000           -3,486   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Richland.......................................         839,760          716,192          826,192          -13,568         +110,000
 
Office of River Protection:
    Waste treatment and immobilization plant commissioning.........           3,000            8,000            8,000           +5,000   ...............
    Rad liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition............         733,965          713,311          719,000          -14,965           +5,689
    Construction:
        15-D-409 Low activity waste pretreatment system............          73,000           93,000           93,000          +20,000   ...............
        01-D-16 A-D, Waste treatment and immobilization plant......         593,000          655,000          680,000          +87,000          +25,000
        18-D-16 Waste treatment and immobilization plant--LBL/       ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
         Direct feed LAW...........................................
        01-D-16 D High-level waste facility........................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
        01-D-16 E, Pretreatment facility...........................          97,000           35,000           90,000           -7,000          +55,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Construction......................................         763,000          783,000          863,000         +100,000          +80,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Office of river protection.....................       1,499,965        1,504,311        1,590,000          +90,035          +85,689
 
Idaho National Laboratory:
    Idaho cleanup and waste disposition............................         379,088          346,155          346,155          -32,933   ...............
    Idaho community and regulatory support.........................           3,000            4,071            4,071           +1,071   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Idaho National Laboratory.............................         382,088          350,226          350,226          -31,862   ...............
 
NNSA sites and Nevada offsites:
    Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.........................           1,396            1,175            1,175             -221   ...............
    Separations Process Research Unit..............................           3,685            1,800            1,800           -1,885   ...............
    Nevada.........................................................          62,176           60,136           60,136           -2,040   ...............
    Sandia National Laboratory.....................................           4,130            2,600            2,600           -1,530   ...............
    Los Alamos National Laboratory.................................         194,000          191,629          217,529          +23,529          +25,900
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, NNSA sites and Nevada off-sites.......................         265,387          257,340          283,240          +17,853          +25,900
 
Oak Ridge Reservation:
    OR Nuclear facility D&D........................................         131,851           77,479          118,203          -13,648          +40,724
    U233 disposition program.......................................          43,311           33,784           50,311           +7,000          +16,527
    OR Cleanup and waste disposition...............................          68,457           66,632           71,000           +2,543           +4,368
    Construction:
        17-D-401 On-site waste disposal facility...................           6,000            5,000           10,000           +4,000           +5,000
        14-D-403 Outfall 200 mercury treatment facility............           5,100           17,100           17,100          +12,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, Construction...................................          11,100           22,100           27,100          +16,000           +5,000
 
    OR Community & regulatory support..............................           5,500            4,605            5,605             +105           +1,000
    OR Technology development and deployment.......................           3,000            3,000            3,000   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Oak Ridge Reservation.................................         263,219          207,600          275,219          +12,000          +67,619
 
Savannah River Site:
    SR Site risk management operations.............................         448,980   ...............  ...............        -448,980   ...............
    Nuclear Material Management....................................  ...............         323,482          311,015         +311,015          -12,467
    Environmental Cleanup..........................................  ...............         159,478          159,478         +159,478   ...............
    SR Community and regulatory support............................          11,249           11,249           11,249   ...............  ...............
    SR Radioactive liquid tank waste stabilization and disposition.         600,123          597,258          597,258           -2,865   ...............
    Construction:
        18-D-401 Saltstone disposal unit #8/9......................  ...............             500              500             +500   ...............
        18-D-402 Energency Operations Center Replacement, SR.......  ...............             500              500             +500   ...............
        17-D-402 Saltstone disposal Unit #7, SRS...................           5,500           40,000           30,000          +24,500          -10,000
        15-D-402 Saltstone disposal Unit #6, SRS...................           7,577   ...............  ...............          -7,577   ...............
        05-D-405 Salt waste processing facility, SRS...............         160,000          150,000          150,000          -10,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Savannah River Site...............................       1,233,429        1,282,467        1,260,000          +26,571          -22,467
 
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant:
    Waste Isolation Pilot Plant....................................         260,188          250,971          260,971             +783          +10,000
    Construction:
        15-D-411 Safety significant confinement ventilation system,           2,532           46,000           20,000          +17,468          -26,000
         WIPP......................................................
        15-D-412 Exhaust shaft, WIPP...............................          30,000           19,600           20,000          -10,000             +400
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Total, Waste isolation pilot plant.......................         292,720          316,571          300,971           +8,251          -15,600
 
Program direction..................................................         290,050          300,000          290,150             +100           -9,850
Program support....................................................          14,979           35,088           14,979   ...............         -20,109
Safeguards and Security............................................         262,189          269,160          304,102          +41,913          +34,942
Technology development.............................................          25,025           25,000           25,000              -25   ...............
CB-0101 Economic assistance to the state of NM.....................          26,800   ...............  ...............         -26,800   ...............
Cyber security.....................................................  ...............          43,342   ...............  ...............         -43,342
Excess facilities..................................................  ...............         225,000           55,000          +55,000         -170,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Defense Environmental Cleanup......................       5,405,000        5,537,186        5,579,968         +174,968          +42,782
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, DEFENSE ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN UP........................       5,405,000        5,537,186        5,579,968         +174,968          +42,782
                                                                    ====================================================================================
DEFENSE URANIUM ENRICHMENT DECONTAMINATION AND DECOMMISSIONING.....         563,000   ...............         788,000         +225,000         +788,000
 
                      OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES
 
Environment, health, safety and security:
    Environment, health, safety and security.......................         126,972          130,693          126,972   ...............          -3,721
    Program direction..............................................          64,000           68,765           64,000   ...............          -4,765
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Environment, Health, safety and security...........         190,972          199,458          190,972   ...............          -8,486
 
Independent enterprise assessments:
    Independent enterprise assessments.............................          24,580           24,068           24,068             -512   ...............
    Program direction..............................................          51,000           50,863           50,863             -137   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Independent enterprise assessments.................          75,580           74,931           74,931             -649   ...............
 
Specialized security activities....................................         237,912          237,912          238,170             +258             +258
 
Office of Legacy Management:
    Legacy management..............................................         140,306          137,674          137,674           -2,632   ...............
    Program direction..............................................          14,014           16,932           16,932           +2,918   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Office of Legacy Management........................         154,320          154,606          154,606             +286   ...............
 
Defense related administrative support.............................         119,716          143,000          119,716   ...............         -23,284
Office of hearings and appeals.....................................           5,500            5,605            5,605             +105   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, OTHER DEFENSE ACTIVITIES..............................         784,000          815,512          784,000   ...............         -31,512
                                                                    ====================================================================================
DEFENSE NUCLEAR WASTE DISPOSAL.....................................  ...............          30,000   ...............  ...............         -30,000
      TOTAL, ATOMIC ENERGY DEFENSE ACTIVITIES......................      19,690,252       20,313,698       20,837,000       +1,146,748         +523,302
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                 POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS\1\
 
                 SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
 
Operation and maintenance:
    Purchase power and wheeling....................................          78,929           75,055           75,055           -3,874   ...............
    Program direction..............................................           6,000            6,379            6,379             +379   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Operation and maintenance..........................          84,929           81,434           81,434           -3,495   ...............
 
Less alternative financing [PPW]...................................         -18,169          -15,070          -15,070           +3,099   ...............
Offsetting collections (for PPW)...................................         -60,760          -59,985          -59,985             +775   ...............
Offsetting collections (PD)........................................          -1,000           -6,379           -6,379           -5,379   ...............
Use of prior-year balances.........................................          -5,000   ...............  ...............          +5,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SOUTHEASTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION.....................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                 SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION
 
Operation and maintenance:
    Operating expenses.............................................          13,896           16,680           16,680           +2,784   ...............
    Purchase power and wheeling....................................          83,000           93,000           93,000          +10,000   ...............
    Program direction..............................................          31,516           31,335           31,335             -181   ...............
    Construction...................................................          12,486           14,932           14,932           +2,446   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Operation and maintenance..........................         140,898          155,947          155,947          +15,049   ...............
 
Less alternative financing (for O&M)...............................          -6,269           -9,042           -9,042           -2,773   ...............
Less alternative financing (for PPW)...............................         -10,000          -10,000          -10,000   ...............  ...............
Less alternative financing (Const).................................          -5,986           -9,417           -9,417           -3,431   ...............
Offsetting collections (PD)........................................         -29,271          -16,035          -16,035          +13,236   ...............
Offsetting collections (for O&M)...................................          -5,315           -2,853           -2,853           +2,462   ...............
Offsetting collections (for PPW)...................................         -73,000          -83,000          -83,000          -10,000   ...............
Use of prior year balances.........................................  ...............         -14,200          -14,200          -14,200   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, SOUTHWESTERN POWER ADMINISTRATION.....................          11,057           11,400           11,400             +343   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                 WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
 
Operation and maintenance:
    Construction and rehabilitation................................          62,442           52,272           52,272          -10,170   ...............
    Operation and maintenance......................................          76,697           72,407           72,407           -4,290   ...............
    Purchase power and wheeling....................................         581,634          597,997          597,997          +16,363   ...............
    Program direction..............................................         226,497          235,722          235,722           +9,225   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal, Operation and maintenance..........................         947,270          958,398          958,398          +11,128   ...............
 
Less alternative financing (for O&M)...............................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
Less alternative financing (for Construction)......................         -43,884          -40,500          -40,500           +3,384   ...............
Less alternative financing (for Program Dir.)......................          -6,343           -8,056           -8,056           -1,713   ...............
Less alternative financing (for PPW)...............................        -214,625         -289,072         -289,072          -74,447   ...............
Offsetting collections (for program direction).....................        -150,441         -150,392         -150,392              +49   ...............
Offsetting collections (for O&M)...................................         -27,122          -23,922          -23,922           +3,200   ...............
Offsetting collections (Public Law 108-477, Public Law 109-103)....        -367,009         -308,925         -308,925          +58,084   ...............
Offsetting collections (Public Law 98-381).........................          -8,265           -9,306           -9,306           -1,041   ...............
Use of prior-year balances.........................................         -34,000          -34,853          -34,853             -853   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION.....................          95,581           93,372           93,372           -2,209   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
         FALCON AND AMISTAD OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE FUND
 
Operation and maintenance..........................................           4,393            5,048            5,048             +655   ...............
Offsetting collections.............................................          -3,838           -3,948           -3,948             -110   ...............
Less alternative financing.........................................            -323             -872             -872             -549   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, FALCON AND AMISTAD O&M FUND...........................             232              228              228               -4   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      TOTAL, POWER MARKETING ADMINISTRATIONS.......................         106,870          105,000          105,000           -1,870   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...............................         346,800          367,600          367,600          +20,800   ...............
FERC revenues......................................................        -346,800         -367,600         -367,600          -20,800   ...............
 
                         General Provisions
 
Title III Rescissions:
    Fossil Energy Research and Development.........................        -240,000   ...............  ...............        +240,000   ...............
    Energy Programs and PMAs.......................................         -81,063   ...............  ...............         +81,063   ...............
    Atomic Energy Defense Activities...............................         -13,740   ...............  ...............         +13,740   ...............
 
Uranium lease and take-back revolving fund.........................  ...............          10,000   ...............  ...............         -10,000
Uranium lease and take-back revolving fund initial capitalization..  ...............           1,000            1,000           +1,000   ...............
Northeast gasoline supply reserve sale.............................  ...............         -70,000          -70,000          -70,000   ...............
Weapons activities (rescission)....................................  ...............  ...............         -64,000          -64,000          -64,000
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (rescission)......................  ...............  ...............         -49,000          -49,000          -49,000
Sec. 309(a) (rescission)...........................................  ...............  ...............        -236,700         -236,700         -236,700
Sec. 309(b) (rescission)...........................................  ...............  ...............        -160,660         -160,660         -160,660
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, General Provisions....................................        -334,803          -59,000         -579,360         -244,557         -520,360
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      GRAND TOTAL, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY............................      30,746,009       27,870,597       31,463,626         +717,617       +3,593,029
          (Total amount appropriated)..............................     (31,181,773)     (28,215,964)     (31,973,986)       (+792,213)     (+3,758,022)
          (Rescissions)............................................       (-435,764)       (-345,367)       (-510,360)        (-74,596)       (-164,993)
                                                                    ====================================================================================
 
                        SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTS
 
Energy efficiency and renewable energy.............................       2,090,200          636,149        1,936,988         -153,212       +1,300,839
Electricity delivery and energy reliability........................         230,000          120,000          213,141          -16,859          +93,141
Nuclear energy.....................................................       1,016,616          703,000          917,020          -99,596         +214,020
Fossil Energy Research and Development.............................         668,000          280,000          572,701          -95,299         +292,701
Naval Petroleum & Oil Shale Reserves...............................          14,950            4,900            4,900          -10,050   ...............
Strategic petroleum reserve........................................         223,000          180,000          180,000          -43,000   ...............
SPR Petroleum Account..............................................  ...............           8,400   ...............  ...............          -8,400
Northeast home heating oil reserve.................................           6,500            6,500            6,500   ...............  ...............
Energy Information Administration..................................         122,000          118,000          122,000   ...............          +4,000
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup..................................         247,000          218,400          266,000          +19,000          +47,600
Uranium enrichment D&D fund........................................         768,000          752,749          788,000          +20,000          +35,251
Nuclear Waste Disposal.............................................  ...............          90,000   ...............  ...............         -90,000
Science............................................................       5,392,000        4,472,516        5,550,000         +158,000       +1,077,484
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy...........................         306,000          -26,367          330,000          +24,000         +356,367
Departmental administration........................................         143,000          145,652          142,736             -264           -2,916
Office of the Inspector General....................................          44,424           49,000           49,000           +4,576   ...............
Title 17 Innovative technology loan guarantee program..............           7,000         -250,000   ...............          -7,000         +250,000
Advanced technology vehicles manufacturing loan pgm................           5,000            2,000            5,000   ...............          +3,000
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee program...............................  ...............  ...............           1,000           +1,000           +1,000
 
Atomic energy defense activities:
    National Nuclear Security Administration:
        Weapons activities.........................................       9,245,567       10,239,344       10,000,071         +754,504         -239,273
        Defense nuclear nonproliferation...........................       1,882,872        1,793,310        1,852,310          -30,562          +59,000
        Naval reactors.............................................       1,419,813        1,479,751        1,436,651          +16,838          -43,100
        Federal Salaries and Expenses..............................         390,000          418,595          396,000           +6,000          -22,595
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Subtotal, National Nuclear Security Admin................      12,938,252       13,931,000       13,685,032         +746,780         -245,968
 
    Defense environmental cleanup..................................       5,405,000        5,537,186        5,579,968         +174,968          +42,782
    Defense uranium enrichment decontamination and decommissioning.         563,000   ...............         788,000         +225,000         +788,000
    Other defense activities.......................................         784,000          815,512          784,000   ...............         -31,512
    Defense nuclear waste disposal.................................  ...............          30,000   ...............  ...............         -30,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities......................      19,690,252       20,313,698       20,837,000       +1,146,748         +523,302
 
Power marketing administrations (1):
    Southeastern Power Administration..............................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
    Southwestern Power Administration..............................          11,057           11,400           11,400             +343   ...............
    Western Area Power Administration..............................          95,581           93,372           93,372           -2,209   ...............
    Falcon and Amistad operating and maintenance fund..............             232              228              228               -4   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Power Marketing Administrations.......................         106,870          105,000          105,000           -1,870   ...............
 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission:
    Salaries and expenses..........................................         346,800          367,600          367,600          +20,800   ...............
    Revenues.......................................................        -346,800         -367,600         -367,600          -20,800   ...............
General Provisions.................................................        -334,803          -59,000         -579,360         -244,557         -520,360
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total Summary of Accounts, Department of Energy..............      30,746,009       27,870,597       31,463,626         +717,617       +3,593,029
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Totals include alternative financing costs, reimbursable agreement funding, and power purchase and wheeling expenditures. Offsetting collection
  totals reflect funds collected for annual expenses, including power purchase and wheeling.

                GENERAL PROVISIONS--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

    Section 301. Language is included on the execution of 
appropriations, including reprogramming, and congressional 
notification.
    Section 302. Language is included specifically authorizing 
intelligence activities pending enactment of the fiscal year 
2018 Intelligence Authorization Act.
    Section 303. The bill includes a provision related to 
nuclear safety requirements.
    Section 304. The bill includes language related to 
independent cost estimates.
    Section 305. The bill includes language concerning full 
funding of awards.
    Section 306. The bill includes language concerning Uranium 
Lease and Take-Back Fund.
    Section 307. The bill includes language concerning a pilot 
program related to consolidated storage of spent nuclear fuel.
    Section 308. The bill includes language regarding 
reprogramming authority.
    Section 309. The bill includes a rescission.
    Section 310. The bill includes a rescission.
    Section 311. The bill includes a rescission.
    Section 312. The bill includes language concerning the 
Strategic Petroleum Reserve.
    Section 313. The bill includes language concerning a report 
by the Secretary of Energy.

                                TITLE IV

                          INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

    The budget request proposes to eliminate several 
independent agencies, including the Appalachian Regional 
Commission, Delta Regional Authority, Denali Commission, and 
Northern Border Regional Commission. The budget requests 
funding to conduct closeout of the agencies in fiscal year 
2018. The Committee strongly opposes the termination of these 
agencies, and recommends funding to continue their activities. 
The Administration shall continue all activities funded by this 
Act, as well as follow directive language included in this 
report. No funds shall be used for the planning of or 
implementation of termination of these agencies.

                    Appalachian Regional Commission

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $152,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      26,700,000
Committee recommendation................................     142,000,000

    The Committee recommends $142,000,000 for the Appalachian 
Regional Commission [ARC]. Established in 1965, the Appalachian 
Regional Commission is an economic development agency composed 
of 13 Appalachian States and a Federal co-chair appointed by 
the President. Within available funding, $70,000,000 is 
provided for base funds.
    Further, not less than $16,000,000 shall be for a program 
of industrial site and workforce development in Southern and 
South Central Appalachia, focused primarily on the automotive 
supplier sector and the aviation sector. Up to $13,500,000 of 
that amount is recommended for activities in Southern 
Appalachia. The funds shall be distributed according to the 
Commission's Distressed Counties Formula, which is comprised of 
land area, population estimates, and a proportion of the number 
of distressed counties.
    Within available funding, the Committee recommends 
$6,000,000 for a program of basic infrastructure improvements 
in distressed counties in Central Appalachia. Funds shall be 
distributed according to ARC's distressed counties formula and 
shall be in addition to the regular allocation to distressed 
counties.
    Within available funds, the Committee recommends 
$50,000,000 for the POWER Initiative to support communities, 
primarily in Appalachia, that have been adversely impacted by 
the closure of coal-powered generating plants and a declining 
coal industry by providing resources for economic 
diversification, job creation, job training, and other 
employment services.

                Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $30,872,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      30,600,000
Committee recommendation................................      30,000,000

    The Committee recommends $30,000,000 for the Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Congress permanently 
authorized the Inspector General for the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission to serve as the Inspector General for the Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. The Committee recommendation 
includes $1,131,000 within the Office of Inspector General of 
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to perform these services.

                        Delta Regional Authority

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $25,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       2,500,000
Committee recommendation................................      25,000,000

    The Committee recommends $25,000,000 for the Delta Regional 
Authority [DRA]. The DRA is a Federal-State partnership that is 
designed to assist the eight-State Mississippi Delta Region in 
developing basic infrastructure, transportation, skill 
training, and opportunities for economic development for 
distressed counties and parishes. Within available funds, not 
less than $10,000,000 shall be used for flood control, basic 
public infrastructure development and transportation 
improvements, which shall be allocated separate from the State 
formula funding method. The Committee does not include a 
statutory waiver with regard to DRA's priority of funding, and 
directs DRA to focus on activities relating to basic public 
infrastructure and transportation infrastructure before 
allocating funding toward other priority areas.

                           Denali Commission

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $15,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       7,300,000
Committee recommendation................................      15,000,000

    The Committee recommends $15,000,000 for the Denali 
Commission. The Denali Commission is a Federal-State 
partnership responsible for promoting infrastructure 
development, job training, and other economic support services 
in rural areas throughout Alaska.

                  Northern Border Regional Commission

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $10,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................         850,000
Committee recommendation................................      15,000,000

    The Committee recommends $15,000,000 for the Northern 
Border Regional Commission. Within available funds, no less 
than $3,000,000 is for initiatives that seek to address the 
decline in forest-based economies throughout the region.

                     Nuclear Regulatory Commission

                         SALARIES AND EXPENSES

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $905,000,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     939,137,000
Committee recommendation................................     914,137,000

                                REVENUES

Appropriations, 2017....................................   -$794,580,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................    -803,409,000
Committee recommendation................................    -807,848,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................    $110,420,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................     135,728,000
Committee recommendation................................     106,221,000

    The Commission's mission is to ensure the safety and 
security of the nation's use of nuclear power and nuclear 
materials and protect the workers and public who use and 
benefit from these materials and facilities. The Committee 
recommends $914,137,000 for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 
[Commission], a decrease of $25,000,000 from the budget 
request. The Committee's recommendation requires the use of 
$10,000,000 of unobligated balances from prior appropriations. 
This amount is offset by estimated revenues of $807,848,000, 
resulting in a net appropriation of $106,221,000. In developing 
this recommendation, the Committee has consulted with the 
Commission to ensure it maintains its gold-standard health and 
safety mission while reducing low-priority work. The Committee 
recommends that the unobligated balance of $68,076.04 provided 
to the Commission from the United States Agency for 
International Development in 1994 pursuant to section 632(a) of 
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, for which there is no 
currently authorized use, be rescinded.
    Budget Execution Plan.--The Commission is directed to 
provide the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress with a specific budget execution plan no later than 30 
days after the date of enactment of this act. This plan shall 
provide details at the product line level within each of the 
control points, as applicable, included in the table after the 
Office of Inspector General heading below.
    Budget Control Points.--The recommendation includes budget 
control points for fiscal year 2018 to ensure the Commission's 
budget execution follows congressional intent. These budget 
control points are included in the table following the heading 
of Office of Inspector General. As it did for fiscal year 2017, 
the Committee includes statutory language incorporating the new 
control points by reference into law, and notes that any 
breaches are now subject to the reporting requirements and 
remedies of the Antideficiency Act contained in title 31 of the 
United States Code.
    Reprogramming Authority.--Section 402 continues 
reprogramming authority included in the Energy and Water 
Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2017, for 
the Commission between the budget control points, subject to 
prior congressional approval, with a provision made for 
emergency circumstances. This reprogramming authority 
supersedes the Commission's existing guidance on internal 
reprogrammings.
    Unobligated Balances from Prior Appropriations.--The 
Committee notes that the Commission carries unobligated 
balances from appropriations received prior to fiscal year 
2018. The Committee's recommendation requires the use of 
$10,000,000 of these balances, derived from fee-based 
activities. Because the Commission has already collected fees 
corresponding to these activities in prior years, the Committee 
does not include these funds within the fee base calculation 
for determining authorized revenues, and does not provide 
authority to collect additional offsetting receipts for their 
use. The Committee notes that any remaining unobligated 
balances carried forward from prior years are subject to the 
reprogramming guidelines in section 402, and shall only be used 
to supplement appropriations consistent with those guidelines.
    Reductions from Efficiencies.--In the past few years, the 
Commission's budget has included potential savings identified 
by the Commission's staff based on discontinuation, de-
prioritization, or incremental reductions of activities. 
According to the Commission's staff, including these savings 
has not adversely affected the Commission's safety mission. The 
Committee applauds the Commission's reviews of its programs to 
find these efficiencies, and urges the Commission to continue 
to identify additional efficiencies in management practices, 
work control processes, and staffing.
    Integrated University Program.--The Committee recommends 
$15,000,000 for the Integrated University Program, of which not 
less than $5,000,000 is for grants to support research projects 
that do not align with programmatic missions but are critical 
to maintaining the discipline of nuclear science.
    Rulemaking.--The Committee directs the Commission to 
provide to the Committees on Appropriations of both Houses of 
Congress within 90 days after the date of enactment of this 
act, and quarterly thereafter, an update of appendix G of the 
budget request regarding planned rulemakings.
    Reporting Requirement.--The Committee directs the 
Commission to continue the reporting required in the 
explanatory statement for the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 2017, relating to progress against the 
Commission's licensing goals and right-sizing commitments.
    Modeling and Simulation Tools.--The continued operation of 
the nation's current fleet of nuclear power reactors is vitally 
important to our energy infrastructure. The Consortium for 
Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors [CASL] has 
developed modeling and simulation tools, including for the use 
of accident tolerant fuels, which can result in more efficient 
and cost-effective plant operations. Not later than 180 days 
after the date of enactment of this act, the Commission is 
directed to report to the Committees on Appropriations of both 
Houses of Congress the Commission's potential uses of CASL's 
tools in its licensing process and safety reviews.

                      OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL

                          GROSS APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $12,129,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      12,859,000
Committee recommendation................................      12,859,000

                                REVENUES

Appropriations, 2017....................................     $10,044,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................      10,555,000
Committee recommendation................................      10,555,000

                           NET APPROPRIATION

Appropriations, 2017....................................      $2,085,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       2,304,000
Committee recommendation................................       2,304,000

    The Committee recommends $12,859,000 for the Office of 
Inspector General, the same as the budget request, which is 
offset by revenues estimated at $10,555,000, for a net 
appropriation of $2,304,000. The Office of Inspector General 
serves both the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Defense 
Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, and the recommendation 
includes $1,131,000 for that purpose that is not available from 
fee revenues.
    In line with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's recent 
Project Aim activities, the Committee encourages the Office of 
Inspector General to examine its own program to identify 
savings and efficiencies that could be realized within the 
Office of Inspector General without negatively impacting its 
mission.

                                          NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
                                            [In thousands of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                     Committee
                                                                                                  recommendation
                              Item                                    Budget         Committee      compared to
                                                                     estimate     recommendation      budget
                                                                                                     estimate
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SALARIES AND EXPENSES...........................................         939,137  ..............        -939,137
    NUCLEAR REACTOR SAFETY......................................  ..............         466,655        +466,655
    NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND WASTE SAFETY..........................  ..............         113,145        +113,145
    DECOMMISSIONING AND LOW-LEVEL WASTE.........................  ..............          27,980         +27,980
    CORPORATE SUPPORT...........................................  ..............         301,357        +301,357
    INTEGRATED UNIVERSITY PROGRAM...............................  ..............          15,000         +15,000
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL..................................................         939,137         924,137         -15,000
 
          USE OF PRIOR YEAR BALANCES............................  ..............         -10,000         -10,000
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
            TOTAL, SALARIES AND EXPENSES........................         939,137         914,137         -25,000
                                                                 ===============================================
RESCISSION......................................................  ..............             -68             -68
    REVENUES....................................................        -803,409        -807,848          -4,439
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL..................................................         135,728         106,221         -29,507
 
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL:
    OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.................................          12,859          12,859  ..............
    REVENUES....................................................         -10,555         -10,555  ..............
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
      SUBTOTAL..................................................           2,304           2,304  ..............
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
      TOTAL, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION......................         138,032         108,525         -29,507
          APPROPRIATIONS........................................       (138,032)       (108,593)       (-29,439)
          RECISSIONS............................................  ..............           (-68)           (-68)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board

Appropriations, 2017....................................      $3,600,000
Budget estimate, 2018...................................       3,600,000
Committee recommendation................................       3,600,000

    The Committee recommends $3,600,000 for the Nuclear Waste 
Technical Review Board to be derived from the Nuclear Waste 
Fund, the same as the budget request.

                           GENERAL PROVISIONS

    Section 401. The Committee includes language regarding 
Congressional requests for information.
    Section 402. The Committee includes reprogramming language 
for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

                                TITLE V

                           GENERAL PROVISIONS

    The following list of general provisions is recommended by 
the Committee:
    Section 501. The provision prohibits the use of any funds 
provided in this bill from being used to influence 
congressional action.
    Section 502. The provision addresses transfer authority 
under this act.

                     Program, Project, and Activity

    In fiscal year 2018, for purposes of the Balanced Budget 
and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Public Law 99-177), 
as amended, the following information provides the definition 
of the term ``program, project or activity'' for departments 
and agencies under the jurisdiction of the Energy and Water 
Development and Related Agencies Appropriation Act. The term 
``program, project or activity'' shall include the most 
specific level of budget items identified in the Energy and 
Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill, 
2018 and the report accompanying the bill.
    If a sequestration order is necessary, in implementing the 
Presidential order, departments and agencies shall apply any 
percentage reduction required for fiscal year 2018 pursuant to 
the provisions of Public Law 99-177 to all items specified in 
the report accompanying the bill by the Senate Committee on 
Appropriations in support of the fiscal year 2018 budget 
estimates as modified by congressional action.

  COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7, RULE XVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 7 of rule XVI requires Committee reports on 
general appropriations bills to identify each Committee 
amendment to the House bill ``which proposes an item of 
appropriation which is not made to carry out the provisions of 
an existing law, a treaty stipulation, or an act or resolution 
previously passed by the Senate during that session.''
    The Committee is filing an original bill, which is not 
covered under this rule, but reports this information in the 
spirit of full disclosure.
    The Committee recommends funding for the following programs 
or activities which currently lack authorization for fiscal 
year 2018:

                             APPROPRIATIONS NOT AUTHORIZED BY LAW--FISCAL YEAR 2018
                                             [Dollars in thousands]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                   Appropriation
                                                      Last Year of  Authorization   in Last Year        Net
                   Agency/Program                    Authorization      Level            of        Appropriation
                                                                                   Authorization   in this Bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Corps FUSRAP.......................................  .............          \(1)\  .............         117,000
EERE Program Direction.............................           2006        110,500        164,198         153,500
EERE Weatherization Activities.....................           2012      1,400,000         68,000         215,000
EERE State Energy Programs.........................           2012        125,000         50,000          50,000
EERE Marine and Hydrokinetic R&D...................           2012         50,000         34,000          57,000
Nuclear Energy.....................................           2009        495,000        792,000         788,020
Nuclear Energy Infrastructure and Facilities.......           2009        145,000        245,000         240,202
Fossil Energy......................................           2009        641,000        727,320         572,701
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves.............           2014         20,000         20,000           4,900
Strategic Petroleum Reserve........................           2003  not specified        172,856         180,000
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve.................           2003  not specified          6,000           6,500
Energy Information Administration..................           1984  not specified         55,870         122,000
Office of Science..................................           2013      6,007,000      4,876,000       5,550,000
Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program..           2012  not specified          6,000           5,000
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy...........           2013        312,000        265,000         330,000
 
Non-Defense Environmental Cleanup:
    West Valley Demonstration......................           1981          5,000          5,000          75,000
Departmental Administration........................           1984        246,963        185,682         142,736
 
Atomic Energy Defense Activities:
    National Nuclear Security Administration:
        Weapons Activities.........................           2017      9,429,029      9,245,567      10,000,071
        Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation...........           2017      1,886,916      1,882,872       1,852,310
        Naval Reactors.............................           2017      1,417,620      1,419,813       1,436,651
        Federal Salaries and Expenses..............           2017        395,517        390,000         396,000
Defense Environmental Cleanup......................           2017      5,273,558      5,405,000       5,579,968
Other Defense Activities...........................           2017        789,552        784,000         784,000
 
Power Marketing Administrations:
    Southwestern...................................           1984         40,254         36,229          11,400
    Western Area...................................           1984        259,700        194,630          93,372
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission...............           1984  not specified         29,582  ..............
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............           2017         31,000         30,872          30,000
Nuclear Regulatory Commission......................           1985        460,000        448,200         108,525
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Program was initiated in 1972 and has never received a separate authorization.

COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7(c), RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Pursuant to paragraph 7(c) of rule XXVI, on July 20, 2017, 
the Committee ordered favorably reported a bill (S. 1609) 
making appropriations for energy and water development and 
related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2018, 
and for other purposes, provided, that the bill be subject to 
amendment and that the bill be consistent with the subcommittee 
funding guidance, and provided that the Chairman of the 
Committee or his designee be authorized to offer the substance 
of the original bill as a Committee amendment in the nature of 
a substitute to the House companion measure, by a recorded vote 
of 30-1, a quorum being present. The vote was as follows:
        Yeas                          Nays
Chairman Cochran                    Mr. Graham
Mr. McConnell
Mr. Shelby
Mr. Alexander
Ms. Collins
Ms. Murkowski
Mr. Blunt
Mr. Moran
Mr. Hoeven
Mr. Boozman
Mrs. Capito
Mr. Lankford
Mr. Daines
Mr. Kennedy
Mr. Rubio
Mr. Leahy
Mrs. Murray
Mrs. Feinstein
Mr. Durbin
Mr. Reed
Mr. Tester
Mr. Udall
Mrs. Shaheen
Mr. Merkley
Mr. Coons
Mr. Schatz
Ms. Baldwin
Mr. Murphy
Mr. Manchin
Mr. Van Hollen

 COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 12, RULE XXVI, OF THE STANDING RULES OF THE 
                                 SENATE

    Paragraph 12 of rule XXVI requires that Committee reports 
on a bill or joint resolution repealing or amending any statute 
or part of any statute include ``(a) the text of the statute or 
part thereof which is proposed to be repealed; and (b) a 
comparative print of that part of the bill or joint resolution 
making the amendment and of the statute or part thereof 
proposed to be amended, showing by stricken-through type and 
italics, parallel columns, or other appropriate typographical 
devices the omissions and insertions which would be made by the 
bill or joint resolution if enacted in the form recommended by 
the Committee.''

               TITLE 33--NAVIGATION AND NAVIGABLE WATERS

                Chapter 36--Water Resources Development

                    Subchapter V--General Provisions

Sec. 2340. Revision of project partnership agreement; cost sharing

(a) Federal allocation

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

[(c) Cost estimates

    The estimated Federal and non-Federal costs of water 
resources projects authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary before, on, or after November 8, 2007, are for 
informational purposes only and shall not be interpreted as 
affecting the cost-sharing responsibilities established by 
law.]
                                ------                                

                         TITLE 43--PUBLIC LANDS

        Chapter 40--Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief

                     Subchapter I--Drought Program

Sec. 2214. Applicable period of drought program

(a) In general

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

(c) Termination of authority

    The authorities established under this subchapter shall 
terminate on September 30, [2017] 2022.

           *       *       *       *       *       *       *

          Subchapter III--General and Miscellaneous Provisions

Sec. 2241. Authorization of appropriations

    Except as otherwise provided in section 2243 of this title 
(relating to temperature control devices at Shasta Dam, 
California), there is authorized to be appropriated not more 
than [$90,000,000] $120,000,000 in total for the period of 
fiscal years 2006 through [2017] 2022.
                                ------                                

                        BUDGETARY IMPACT OF BILL

  PREPARED IN CONSULTATION WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE PURSUANT TO SEC. 308(A), PUBLIC LAW 93-344, AS
                                                     AMENDED
                                            [In millions of dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Budget authority               Outlays
                                                           -----------------------------------------------------
                                                              Committee    Amount  in    Committee    Amount  in
                                                             guidance\1\      bill      guidance\1\      bill
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comparison of amounts in the bill with Committee guidance
 to its subcommittees of amounts for 2018: Subcommittee on
 Energy and Water Development:
    Mandatory.............................................  ............  ...........  ............  ...........
    Discretionary.........................................        38,400       38,400        38,860    \2\38,860
        Security..........................................        21,000       21,000            NA           NA
        Nonsecurity.......................................        17,400       17,400            NA           NA
Projections of outlays associated with the recommendation:
    2018..................................................  ............  ...........  ............    \3\22,776
    2019..................................................  ............  ...........  ............       10,968
    2020..................................................  ............  ...........  ............        3,658
    2021..................................................  ............  ...........  ............          799
    2022 and future years.................................  ............  ...........  ............          515
Financial assistance to State and local governments for               NA          168            NA  ...........
 2018.....................................................                                            .......\3\
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There is no section 302(a) allocation to the Committee on Appropriations for fiscal year 2018.
\2\Includes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
\3\Excludes outlays from prior-year budget authority.
 
NA: Not applicable.

  COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF NEW BUDGET (OBLIGATIONAL) AUTHORITY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017 AND BUDGET ESTIMATES AND AMOUNTS RECOMMENDED IN THE BILL FOR FISCAL
                                                                        YEAR 2018
                                                                [In thousands of dollars]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                         Senate Committee recommendation
                                                                                                                             compared with (+ or -)
                                Item                                       2017       Budget estimate     Committee    ---------------------------------
                                                                      appropriation                     recommendation        2017
                                                                                                                         appropriation   Budget estimate
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               TITLE I--DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE--CIVIL
 
                       DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
 
                     Corps of Engineers--Civil
 
Investigations.....................................................         121,000           86,000          113,465           -7,535          +27,465
Construction.......................................................       1,876,000        1,020,000        1,703,150         -172,850         +683,150
    Rescission.....................................................  ...............  ...............         -35,000          -35,000          -35,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................       1,876,000        1,020,000        1,668,150         -207,850         +648,150
 
Mississippi River and Tributaries..................................         362,000          253,000          375,000          +13,000         +122,000
Operation and Maintenance..........................................       3,149,000        3,100,000        3,481,475         +332,475         +381,475
Regulatory Program.................................................         200,000          200,000          200,000   ...............  ...............
Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP)...........         112,000          118,000          117,000           +5,000           -1,000
Flood Control and Coastal Emergencies..............................          32,000           35,000           21,904          -10,096          -13,096
Expenses...........................................................         181,000          185,000          185,000           +4,000   ...............
Office of Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works)............           4,764            5,000            4,406             -358             -594
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title I, Department of Defense--Civil.................       6,037,764        5,002,000        6,166,400         +128,636       +1,164,400
          Appropriations...........................................      (6,037,764)      (5,002,000)      (6,201,400)       (+163,636)     (+1,199,400)
          Rescissions..............................................  ...............  ...............        (-35,000)        (-35,000)        (-35,000)
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                TITLE II--DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 
                        Central Utah Project
 
Central Utah Project Completion Account............................          10,500            8,983           10,500   ...............          +1,517
 
                       Bureau of Reclamation
 
Water and Related Resources........................................       1,155,894          960,017        1,150,349           -5,545         +190,332
Central Valley Project Restoration Fund............................          55,606           41,376           41,376          -14,230   ...............
California Bay-Delta Restoration...................................          36,000           37,000           37,000           +1,000   ...............
Policy and Administration..........................................          59,000           59,000           59,000   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Bureau of Reclamation.................................       1,306,500        1,097,393        1,287,725          -18,775         +190,332
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title II, Department of the Interior..................       1,317,000        1,106,376        1,298,225          -18,775         +191,849
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                  TITLE III--DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
 
                          Energy Programs
 
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.............................       2,090,200          636,149        1,936,988         -153,212       +1,300,839
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability........................         230,000          120,000          213,141          -16,859          +93,141
Nuclear Energy.....................................................         880,000          570,000          788,020          -91,980         +218,020
    Defense function...............................................         136,616          133,000          129,000           -7,616           -4,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................       1,016,616          703,000          917,020          -99,596         +214,020
 
Fossil Energy Research and Development.............................         618,000          280,000          572,701          -45,299         +292,701
    Fossil proviso.................................................          50,000   ...............  ...............         -50,000   ...............
Naval Petroleum and Oil Shale Reserves.............................          14,950            4,900            4,900          -10,050   ...............
Strategic Petroleum Reserve........................................         223,000          180,000          180,000          -43,000   ...............
    Sale of crude oil..............................................        -340,000         -350,000         -350,000          -10,000   ...............
    Use of sale proceeds...........................................         340,000          350,000          350,000          +10,000   ...............
SPR petroleum account..............................................  ...............           8,400   ...............  ...............          -8,400
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................  ...............           8,400   ...............  ...............          -8,400
 
Northeast Home Heating Oil Reserve.................................           6,500            6,500            6,500   ...............  ...............
Energy Information Administration..................................         122,000          118,000          122,000   ...............          +4,000
Non-defense Environmental Cleanup..................................         247,000          218,400          266,000          +19,000          +47,600
Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund........         768,000          752,749          788,000          +20,000          +35,251
Science............................................................       5,392,000        4,472,516        5,550,000         +158,000       +1,077,484
Nuclear Waste Disposal.............................................  ...............          90,000   ...............  ...............         -90,000
 
Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy...........................         306,000           20,000          330,000          +24,000         +310,000
    Rescission.....................................................  ...............         -46,367   ...............  ...............         +46,367
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................         306,000          -26,367          330,000          +24,000         +356,367
 
Title 17 Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program..............          37,000            2,000            2,000          -35,000   ...............
    Offsetting collection..........................................         -30,000           -2,000           -2,000          +28,000   ...............
    Rescission.....................................................  ...............        -250,000   ...............  ...............        +250,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................           7,000         -250,000   ...............          -7,000         +250,000
 
Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loans program...........           5,000            2,000            5,000   ...............          +3,000
Tribal Energy Loan Guarantee Program...............................           9,000   ...............           1,000           -8,000           +1,000
    Rescission.....................................................          -9,000   ...............  ...............          +9,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................  ...............  ...............           1,000           +1,000           +1,000
 
Office of Indian Energy Policy and Programs........................  ...............  ...............          16,000          +16,000          +16,000
Departmental Administration........................................         246,000          241,652          238,736           -7,264           -2,916
    Miscellaneous revenues.........................................        -103,000          -96,000          -96,000           +7,000   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Net appropriation..........................................         143,000          145,652          142,736             -264           -2,916
Office of the Inspector General....................................          44,424           49,000           49,000           +4,576   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Energy programs.......................................      11,283,690        7,510,899       11,100,986         -182,704       +3,590,087
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                  Atomic Energy Defense Activities
 
              National Nuclear Security Administration
 
Weapons Activities.................................................       9,318,093       10,239,344       10,000,071         +681,978         -239,273
    Rescission.....................................................         -64,126   ...............  ...............         +64,126   ...............
    Budget amendment rescission....................................          -8,400   ...............  ...............          +8,400   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................       9,245,567       10,239,344       10,000,071         +754,504         -239,273
 
Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation...................................       1,902,000        1,842,310        1,852,310          -49,690          +10,000
    Rescission.....................................................         -19,128          -49,000   ...............         +19,128          +49,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................       1,882,872        1,793,310        1,852,310          -30,562          +59,000
 
Naval Reactors.....................................................       1,420,120        1,479,751        1,436,651          +16,531          -43,100
    Rescission.....................................................            -307   ...............  ...............            +307   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................       1,419,813        1,479,751        1,436,651          +16,838          -43,100
 
                                                                    ====================================================================================
Federal Salaries and Expenses......................................         390,000          418,595          396,000           +6,000          -22,595
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, National Nuclear Security Administration..............      12,938,252       13,931,000       13,685,032         +746,780         -245,968
                                                                    ====================================================================================
             Environmental and Other Defense Activities
 
Defense Environmental Cleanup......................................       5,405,000        5,537,186        5,579,968         +174,968          +42,782
Defense Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning.....         563,000   ...............         788,000         +225,000         +788,000
Other Defense Activities...........................................         784,000          815,512          784,000   ...............         -31,512
Defense nuclear waste disposal.....................................  ...............          30,000   ...............  ...............         -30,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Environmental and Other Defense Activities............       6,752,000        6,382,698        7,151,968         +399,968         +769,270
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, Atomic Energy Defense Activities......................      19,690,252       20,313,698       20,837,000       +1,146,748         +523,302
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                 Power Marketing Administrations\1\
 
Operation and maintenance, Southeastern Power Administration.......           1,000            6,379            6,379           +5,379   ...............
    Offsetting collections.........................................          -1,000           -6,379           -6,379           -5,379   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
 
Operation and maintenance, Southwestern Power Administration.......          45,643           30,288           30,288          -15,355   ...............
    Offsetting collections.........................................         -34,586          -18,888          -18,888          +15,698   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................          11,057           11,400           11,400             +343   ...............
 
Construction, Rehabilitation, Operation and Maintenance, Western            273,144          267,686          232,276          -40,868          -35,410
 Area Power Administration.........................................
    Offsetting collections.........................................        -177,563         -174,314         -138,904          +38,659          +35,410
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................          95,581           93,372           93,372           -2,209   ...............
 
Falcon and Amistad Operating and Maintenance Fund..................           4,070            4,176            4,176             +106   ...............
    Offsetting collections.........................................          -3,838           -3,948           -3,948             -110   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................             232              228              228               -4   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Power Marketing Administrations.......................         106,870          105,000          105,000           -1,870   ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 
Salaries and expenses..............................................         346,800          367,600          367,600          +20,800   ...............
Revenues applied...................................................        -346,800         -367,600         -367,600          -20,800   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission..................  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............  ...............
 
                         General Provisions
 
Title III Rescissions:
    Department of Energy:
    Energy Programs and PMAs.......................................         -81,063   ...............  ...............         +81,063   ...............
    Atomic Energy Defense Activities (050).........................         -13,740   ...............  ...............         +13,740   ...............
    Fossil Energy Research and Development.........................        -240,000   ...............  ...............        +240,000   ...............
    Weapons activities (rescission)................................  ...............  ...............         -64,000          -64,000          -64,000
    Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (rescission)..................  ...............  ...............         -49,000          -49,000          -49,000
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................        -334,803   ...............        -113,000         +221,803         -113,000
 
Uranium lease and take-back revolving fund.........................  ...............          10,000   ...............  ...............         -10,000
Uranium lease and take-back revolving fund initial capitalization..  ...............           1,000            1,000           +1,000   ...............
Northeast gasoline supply reserve sale.............................  ...............         -70,000          -70,000          -70,000   ...............
Sec. 309(a) (rescission)...........................................  ...............  ...............        -236,700         -236,700         -236,700
Sec. 309(b) (rescission)...........................................  ...............  ...............        -160,660         -160,660         -160,660
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title III, Department of Energy.......................      30,746,009       27,870,597       31,463,626         +717,617       +3,593,029
          Appropriations...........................................     (31,181,773)     (28,215,964)     (31,973,986)       (+792,213)     (+3,758,022)
          Rescissions..............................................       (-435,764)       (-345,367)       (-510,360)        (-74,596)       (-164,993)
                                                                    ====================================================================================
                   TITLE IV--INDEPENDENT AGENCIES
 
Appalachian Regional Commission....................................         152,000           26,660          142,000          -10,000         +115,340
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board............................          30,872           30,600           30,000             -872             -600
Delta Regional Authority...........................................          25,000            2,500           25,000   ...............         +22,500
Denali Commission..................................................          15,000            7,300           15,000   ...............          +7,700
Northern Border Regional Commission................................          10,000              850           15,000           +5,000          +14,150
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission.............................             250   ...............  ...............            -250   ...............
 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission:
    Salaries and expenses..........................................         905,000          939,137          914,137           +9,137          -25,000
    Revenues.......................................................        -794,580         -803,409         -807,848          -13,268           -4,439
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................         110,420          135,728          106,289           -4,131          -29,439
 
    (Rescission)...................................................  ...............  ...............             -68              -68              -68
    Office of Inspector General....................................          12,129           12,859           12,859             +730   ...............
    Revenues.......................................................         -10,044          -10,555          -10,555             -511   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Subtotal.....................................................           2,085            2,304            2,304             +219   ...............
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Total, Nuclear Regulatory Commission.........................         112,505          138,032          108,525           -3,980          -29,507
          Appropriations...........................................        (112,505)        (138,032)        (108,593)         (-3,912)        (-29,439)
          Rescissions..............................................  ...............  ...............            (-68)            (-68)            (-68)
Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board...............................           3,600            3,600            3,600   ...............  ...............
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Total, title IV, Independent agencies........................         349,227          209,542          339,125          -10,102         +129,583
                                                                    ====================================================================================
      Grand total..................................................      38,450,000       34,188,515       39,267,376         +817,376       +5,078,861
          Appropriations...........................................     (38,885,764)     (34,533,882)     (39,812,804)       (+927,040)     (+5,278,922)
          Rescissions..............................................       (-435,764)       (-345,367)       (-545,428)       (-109,664)       (-200,061)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\Totals adjusted to net out alternative financing costs, reimbursable agreement funding, and power purchase and wheeling expenditures. Offsetting
  collection totals only reflect funds collected for annual expenses, excluding power purchase wheeling.
 

                                                                      [all]
```