alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*William Swartz, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 72-13;

Fifth District —

August 24, 1973.

Robert E. Farrell, of Defender Project, of Mt. Vernon, (Richard E. Cunningham, Staff Attorney, and Luther Simmons, Senior Law Student, of counsel,) for appellant.

Robert H. Rice, State’s Attorney, of Belleville, (Philip G. Feder, of counsel,) for the People.

Mr. JUSTICE CREBS

delivered the opinion of the court:

William Swartz was convicted of the offense of burglary after a jury trial in the circuit court of St. Clair County. He was sentenced to a term of not less than fifteen nor more than twenty-five years in the Illinois State Penitentiary. Due to unusual circumstances the case is now here on direct appeal.

Appellant’s brief presents five issues for review. First, that defendant was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; second, the court erred in giving an instruction defining reasonable doubt; third, prejudicial error occurred when the State brought out the fact that defendant remained silent at the time of his arrest; fourth, that the closing arguments by the State constituted prejudicial error; and fifth, that the sentence imposed was excessive.

 There was positive eyewitness identification of the defendant together with numerous circumstances which indicated his guilt. We find *872no merit to the contention that defendant was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. As to the next three contentions, the objections now made were not made at the trial and would thus under ordinary circumstances be waived. After a review of the entire record we find no reason why the ordinary rule of waiver should not apply.

 As regards the contention that the sentence was excessive we note that defendant had two prior felony convictions. However under the circumstances of this case we do not need to pass on that question. During the pendency of this appeal the Uniform Code of Corrections (ch. 38, sec. 1001 *et seq.)*has become effective. Under the Uniform Code the maximum sentence for this offense is twenty years and the minimum cannot exceed one third of the maximum. Since this defendant has now served over seven years, we see no necessity to remand for resentencing. We therefore reduce the sentence to a minimum of six and two-thirds years.

Judgment affirmed and sentence reduced.

G. MORAN, P. J., and JONES, J., concur.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4325 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to modify the anticipated 

value of certain contracts reserved exclusively for small 

business concerns. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4325 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unifying Small Busi3 ness Terminology Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE ANTICIPATED VALUE OF 

5 CERTAIN CONTRACTS RESERVED EXCLU6 SIVELY FOR SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 15(j)(1) of the Small 

8 Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(j)(1)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘greater than $2,500 but not greater than $100,000’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘greater than the micro-purchase threshold de11 fined in section 1902(a) of title 41, United States Code, 

12 but not greater than the simplified acquisition threshold’’. 

13 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 3(m) of the 

14 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(m)) is amended to 

15 read as follows: 

16 ‘‘(m) SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD.—In 

17 this Act, the term ‘simplified acquisition threshold’ has the 

18 meaning given such term in section 134 of title 41, United 

19 States Code.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4325 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to modify the 

clusively for small business concerns. anticipated value of certain contracts reserved ex-
(No. 73-CC-417

#### Behavior Modification Technology, Inc., Columbus, Ohio, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1973.*

Behavior Modification Technology, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
(No. 6852

#### Marguerite Nicholson, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Labor, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 21, 1972.*

Marguerite Nicholson, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Draft Proposal CB-13 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Area-Weighted U-Factor Provisions (CB-13) 

Objective:  Clarify the provisions in the code related to area weighted U‐factor.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C402.3.4 as follows:  

C402.3.4 Area weighted U-factor. An area-weighted average U-factor shall be permitted to satisfy the 

U-factor requirements for each fenestration product category listed in Table C402.3 separately for fixed 

fenestration, operable fenestration and entrance doors. Individual fenestration products from different 

fenestration product categories listed in Table C402.3 shall not be combined in calculating area-weighted 

U-factor. 

Reason:  Clarification and to increase simplicity of the code.

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
### Part B—Reports
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Donald R. ChappelDonald R. ChappelChief Financial Officer of Williams Partners GP
LLC, general partner of Williams Partners L.P.
(Principal Financial Officer)
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-05-00391- CR NO. 03-05-00392- CR Do m ing o Es tr ada , A ppe lla nt

v. The State of Texas, App ellee F ROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY NOS . 29204 & 3134 3, HO NORAB LE EDWARD L. JARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDI NG

ME MO R

A ND UMO P I N I O N Appellant Doming o Estrada appea red w ith c ounsel at a hearing or dere d by this Court and announc ed that he no long er de sires t o p ro s ec u t e these appea ls. SeeTex. R. App. P . 38.8(b), 42.2(a) . The a

ppeals a re dismissed.

__________________________________________

Be a Ann Smith, J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P uryear and Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: F ebrua

ry 3, 2006 Do No t Pu

bli sh
### §6571. References

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, any reference in any statute, reorganization plan, Executive order, regulation, agreement, determination, or other official document or proceeding to the United States International Development Cooperation Agency (IDCA) or to the Director or any other officer or employee of IDCA—

(1) insofar as such reference relates to any function or authority transferred under section 6562(a) of this title, shall be deemed to refer to the Secretary of State;

(2) insofar as such reference relates to any function or authority transferred under section 6562(b) of this title, shall be deemed to refer to the Administrator of the Agency for International Development;

(3) insofar as such reference relates to any function or authority transferred under section 6562(c) of this title, shall be deemed to refer to the head of the agency to which such function or authority is transferred under such section; and

(4) insofar as such reference relates to any function or authority not transferred by this subchapter, shall be deemed to refer to the President or such agency or agencies as may be specified by Executive order.

(Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIV, §1421, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–791.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this subdivision", meaning subdiv. A of div. G of Pub. L. 105–277, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–765, known as the Foreign Affairs Agencies Consolidation Act of 1998. For complete classification of this subdivision to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6501 of this title and Tables.

This subchapter, referred to in par. (4), was in the original "this title", meaning title XIV of subdiv. A of div. G of Pub. L. 105–277, Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–790. For complete classification of title XIV to the Code, see Tables.
### §2673. International Civil Aviation Organization; availability of funds for participation

The provisions of section 287e of this title, and regulations thereunder, applicable to expenses incurred pursuant to sections 287 to 287e of this title, may be applicable to the obligation and expenditure of funds in connection with United States participation in the International Civil Aviation Organization.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §6, 70 Stat. 891; renumbered title I, Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §202(a), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 170k of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Annual Appropriations

Annual appropriations to meet the obligations of membership in various international organizations were contained in acts listed in a note set out under section 269a of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.440 Employer-conducted recruitment. ( a ) *Employer obligations.* Employers must conduct recruitment of U.S. workers to ensure that there are not qualified U.S. workers who will be available for the positions listed in the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.*
( b ) *Period to begin employer-conducted recruitment.* Unless otherwise instructed by the CO, the employer must begin the recruitment required in §§ 655.442 through 655.445 within 14 calendar days from the date the NOA is issued. All employer-conducted recruitment must be completed before the employer submits the recruitment report as required in § 655.446.
( c ) *Interviewing U.S. workers.* Employers that wish to require interviews must conduct those interviews by phone or provide a procedure for the interviews to be conducted in the location where the worker is being recruited so that the worker incurs little or no cost. Employers cannot provide potential CW-1 workers with more favorable treatment with respect to the requirement for, and conduct of, interviews.
( d ) *Qualified and available U.S. workers.* The employer must consider all U.S. applicants for the job opportunity and must hire all U.S. applicants who are qualified and who will be available for the job opportunity. U.S. applicants may be rejected only for lawful, job-related reasons, and those not rejected on this basis will be hired.
( e ) *Recruitment report.* The employer must prepare a recruitment report meeting the requirements of § 655.446, by the date specified by the CO in the NOA.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EARL EMANUEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-857

[October 20, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Gerald Joseph Curley, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502021CA012766XXXXMB.

Earl Emanuel, South Bay, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       16
|   | (i) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Form      10-K”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.      78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dated:      March 12, 2010 |
|--------|----------------------------|

|                         |
|------------------------------|
| /S/ D. FRANK HARRISON        |
| D.      Frank Harrison       |
| Chief      Executive Officer |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,048.37

 1,048.20

 1,048.12

 1,048.08

 1,047.94

 1,047.76

 1,047.62

 1,047.51

 1,047.42

 1,047.37

 1,047.16

 1,046.82

 1,046.54

 1,046.33

 1,046.02

 1,045.70

 1,045.46

 1,045.16

 1,044.74

 1,044.23

 1,043.88

 1,043.63

 1,043.33

 1,042.99

 1,042.71

 1,042.18

 1,041.56

 1,041.03

 1,040.60

 1,040.09

 1,039.62

 4,018.1

 4,013.5

 4,011.3

 4,010.2

 4,006.3

 4,001.4

 3,997.6

 3,994.6

 3,992.1

 3,990.7

 3,985.0

 3,975.7

 3,968.1

 3,962.3

 3,953.9

 3,945.2

 3,938.7

 3,930.6

 3,919.2

 3,905.5

 3,896.0

 3,889.3

 3,881.3

 3,872.1

 3,864.6

 3,850.5

 3,834.0

 3,819.9

 3,808.5

 3,795.0

 3,782.5

STORAGE

-1.9

-4.7

-2.2

-1.1

-3.8

-4.9

-3.8

-3.0

-2.5

-1.4

-5.7

-9.3

-7.6

-5.7

-8.4

-8.7

-6.5

-8.1

-11.4

-13.8

-9.4

-6.7

-8.1

-9.1

-7.5

-14.2

-16.5

-14.1

-11.4

-13.5

-12.4

CHANGE

 6,981

 5,875

 7,179

 7,623

 5,790

 5,472

 7,110

 6,816

 7,267

 7,809

 6,176

 4,469

 5,424

 6,799

 6,486

 6,334

 6,983

 6,755

 5,093

 4,069

 6,594

 6,740

 6,117

 5,814

 4,901

 3,267

 3,311

 3,518

 4,735

 4,982

 4,660

INFLOW

 7,726

 7,965

 8,047

 7,944

 7,436

 7,674

 8,800

 8,045

 8,259

 8,225

 8,809

 8,869

 8,910

 9,499

 10,745

 10,462

 10,001

 10,657

 10,459

 10,729

 10,999

 9,769

 9,943

 10,133

 8,414

 10,172

 11,324

 10,353

 10,249

 11,437

 10,594

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 226

 267

 242

 234

 291

 282

 242

 290

 250

 274

 265

 281

 361

 184

 0

 248

 263

 199

 358

 278

 349

 356

 237

 284

 260

 236

 314

 274

 226

 351

 342

C.F.S.

 .28

 .33

 .30

 .29

 .36

 .35

 .30

 .36

 .31

 .34

 .33

 .35

 .45

 .23

 .00

 .31

 .33

 .25

 .45

 .35

 .44

 .45

 .30

 .36

 .33

 .30

 .40

 .35

 .29

 .45

 .44

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .27

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2001 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 29, 2002

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -237.4 181,149 292,648 0 0 8,264 10.38 .29

ACRE-FEET -237,400 359,309 580,467 0 0 16,392

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 580,467

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 580,467

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .29

JULY 1, 2000 48.36

 4,020.1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

GUILLERMO ALMANZA-GONZALEZ, JR.,

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 419 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 18th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
(No. 73-CC-187

#### General Tire Service, Division of General Tire & Rubber Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Departments of Transportation and General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1973.*

General Tire Service, Division of General Tire & Rubber Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOUND
ON PAGES 3-5 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE YEAR TO DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,343
<SECURITIES>                                     8,960
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                       889
<INVENTORY>                                     16,217
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,628
<PP&E>                                          27,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,761
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           169
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,277
<SALES>                                         43,428
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,428
<CGS>                                           24,587
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,587
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,489
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,853)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,742)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,111)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)
        

</TABLE>