alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 678.605 How is the one-stop operator selected? ( a ) Consistent with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Local WDB must select the one-stop operator through a competitive process, as required by sec. 121(d)(2)(A) of WIOA, at least once every 4 years. A State may require, or a Local WDB may choose to implement, a competitive selection process more than once every 4 years.
( b ) In instances in which a State is conducting the competitive process described in paragraph (a) of this section, the State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurement with non-Federal funds.
( c ) All other non-Federal entities, including subrecipients of a State (such as local areas), must use a competitive process based on local procurement policies and procedures and the principles of competitive procurement in the Uniform Guidance set out at 2 CFR 200.318 through 200.326. All references to “noncompetitive proposals” in the Uniform Guidance at 2 CFR 200.320(f) will be read as “sole source procurement” for the purposes of implementing this section.
( d ) Entities must prepare written documentation explaining the determination concerning the nature of the competitive process to be followed in selecting a one-stop operator.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 190

 190

 198

 289

 278

 339

 1,158

 1,274

 1,524

 1,516

 1,425

 657

 478

 358

 307

 294

 298

 674

 1,165

 2,159

 2,720

 3,299

 2,456

 2,233

 1,632

 1,003

 1,131

 879

 925

 1,157

 176

 177

 179

 185

 204

 208

 212

 257

 257

 269

 255

 245

 232

 227

 234

 232

 224

 225

 234

 265

 317

 401

 365

 340

 329

 294

 309

 287

 283

 265

 179

 181

 185

 206

 230

 247

 471

 459

 492

 488

 437

 335

 295

 277

 254

 258

 248

 306

 433

 654

 817

 1,096

 778

 772

 656

 521

 569

 519

 497

 467

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 11, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §5827. Technical assistance for Russian Far East

#### (a) Authorization

The President is authorized to provide technical assistance, through an American university in a region which received nonstop air service to and from the Russian Far East as of July 1, 1992, to facilitate the development of United States business opportunities, free markets, and democratic institutions in the Russian Far East.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated $2,000,000 to carry out subsection (a).

(Pub. L. 102–511, title III, §307, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3335.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of certain functions of President under this section, see section 3(a) of Ex. Ord. No. 12884, Dec. 1, 1993, 58 F.R. 64099, as amended, set out as a note under section 5812 of this title.
### §3784. Transfer of property to Republic of Panama

#### (a) Conveyance of Panama Railroad

(1) On October 1, 1979, the Secretary of State may convey to the Republic of Panama the Panama Railroad and such property located in the area which, immediately before such date, comprised the Canal Zone and which is not within the land and water areas the use of which is made available to the United States pursuant to the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 and related agreements.

(2) Property transferred pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subsection may not include buildings and other facilities, except housing, located outside such areas, the use of which is retained by the United States pursuant to the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 and related agreements.

#### (b) Transfer of certain property pursuant to Panama Canal Treaty of 1977; report to Congress

With respect to the transfer of all other property (not described in subsection (a)(1) of this section) to be transferred in accordance with the terms of the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 and related agreements, the Secretary of State may convey such property from time to time in accordance with the terms of such Treaty and related agreements. Before the transfer of any such property, the President must submit a written report to the Congress—

(1) precisely identifying and describing the particular property to be transferred;

(2) certifying the state of compliance by the Republic of Panama with such Treaty and related agreements; and

(3) setting forth the reasons for the conveyance being made at the particular time.

#### (c) Restriction on transfer of Panama Canal and certain other property

The Panama Canal, and such other property referred to in paragraph 2(d) of Article XIII of the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 that has not been previously transferred in accordance with paragraphs 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) of such Article, shall not be transferred to the Republic of Panama prior to December 31, 1999.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1504, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 488; Pub. L. 99–223, §7, Dec. 28, 1985, 99 Stat. 1740.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–223 substituted "Before" for "At least 180 days before".

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions vested in President by subsec. (b) delegated to Secretary of State, see section 1–402 of Ex. Ord. No. 12215, May 27, 1980, 45 F.R. 36044, set out as a note under section 3601 of this title.
#### In the Matter of the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of Henry C. Valentine, Deceased. Grace C. Valentine, as Executrix, etc., Appellant; The Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Hew York, entered on the 19th day of December, 1913, which affirmed an order fixing a transfer tax on the estate.

Per Curiam:

We disagree with the learned surrogate in sustaining the objections to the first appraiser’s report, as we think the amount found *844by the appraiser was a fair estimate of the value of the stock in question. The decree of the surrogate should, therefore, be reversed, with costs to the appellant, and the first appraiser’s report fixing the value of the stock at $125.72 per share affirmed, and the appraisal of the property fixed at that sum. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Decree reversed, with costs to appellant, first appraiser’s report fixing value of stock at $125.72 per share affirmed, and appraisal of property fixed at that sum. Order to be settled on notice.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DAVON R. JOHNSON

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Plaintiff Below

, Appellee. §

§ No. 38, 2015

§

§

§ Court Below : Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware,

§ in and for New Castle County

§ Cr. ID No. 0704013046

§

§

§

Submitted: March 10 , 201 5

Decided: March 12 , 2015

ORDER

This 12th day of March 2015 , it appears to the Court that , on February 23

,

2015 , the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice directing the appellant to show cause

why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to file a notice of appeal

within thirty days after entry on the docket of the November 20 , 2014 Superior

Court order dismissing his second motion for postconviction relief . The appellant

has not responded to the notice to show cause within the required ten

- day period

and therefore dismissal of this appeal is deemed to be unopp o sed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule s

3(b)(2) and 29 (b) , that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
### §6481. Business codes of conduct

#### (a) Congressional finding

Congress recognizes the increasing importance of transnational corporations as global actors, and their potential for providing positive leadership in their host countries in the area of human rights.

#### (b) Sense of Congress

It is the sense of the Congress that transnational corporations operating overseas, particularly those corporations operating in countries the governments of which have engaged in or tolerated violations of religious freedom, as identified in the Annual Report, should adopt codes of conduct—

(1) upholding the right to freedom of religion of their employees; and

(2) ensuring that a worker's religious views and peaceful practices of belief in no way affect, or be allowed to affect, the status or terms of his or her employment.

(Pub. L. 105–292, title VII, §701, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2815.)
#### § 686.100 What is the scope of this part?

The regulations in this part outline the requirements that apply to the Job Corps program. More detailed policies and procedures are contained in a Policy and Requirements Handbook issued by the Secretary. Throughout this part, “instructions (procedures) issued by the Secretary” and similar references refer to the Policy and Requirements Handbook and other Job Corps directives.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       15
#### § 702.344 Formal hearings; record of hearing.

All formal hearings shall be open to the public and shall be stenographically reported. All evidence upon which the administrative law judge relies for his final decision shall be contained in the transcript of testimony either directly or by appropriate reference. All medical reports, exhibits, and any other pertinent document or record, in whole or in material part, shall be incorporated into the record either by reference or as an appendix.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 42 (Friday, March 2, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 12760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5132]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0369; Airspace Docket No. 11-AEA-07]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Wilkes-Barre, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal 
Register on July 1, 2011, establishing Class E airspace at Wilkes-
Barre/Wyoming Valley Airport, Wilkes-Barre, PA, is being withdrawn. 
Controlled airspace already exists for area airports under this city 
designator. A new proposal amending the existing airspace will be 
submitted under a separate rulemaking.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC March 2, 2012, the proposed rule published 
July 1, 2011 (76 FR 38585), is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Horrocks, Operations Support 
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O. 
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 305-5588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On July 1, 2011, a NPRM was published in the Federal Register 
establishing Class E airspace at Wilkes-Barre, PA, to accommodate new 
standard instrument approach procedures for Wilkes-Barre/Wyoming Valley 
Airport, Wilkes-Barre, PA (76 FR 38585). Subsequent to publication the 
FAA found that Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above 
the surface currently exists for Wilkes-Barre, PA, with the primary 
airport being Wilkes-Barre/Scranton International Airport. To avoid 
confusion this proposed rule is being withdrawn and another rulemaking 
will be forthcoming adding Wilkes-Barre/Wyoming Valley Airport to the 
current city designator, Wilkes-Barre, PA.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical 
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance 
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and 
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to 
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no 
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an 
environmental assessment

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Withdrawal

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Notice 
of Proposed Rulemaking, as published in the Federal Register of July, 
1, 2011 (76 FR 38585) (FR Doc. 2011-16664), is hereby withdrawn.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on February 15, 2012.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic 
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2012-5132 Filed 3-1-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY ELEVATION

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 238.65

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

 314

STORAGE

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 66

 191

 198

 87

 183

 179

 178

 86

 267

 400

 396

 417

 417

 310

 562

 569

 5,760

 5,660

 5,370

 5,210

 5,080

 4,910

 4,770

 4,750

 5,390

 5,370

 5,410

 5,440

 5,930

 6,020

 5,660

 5,520

 5,410

 5,390

 5,210

 5,280

 5,260

 5,460

 6,160

 6,160

 6,140

 6,160

 5,890

 5,870

 5,950

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 20, 2012

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +0 4,506 160,590

ACRE-FEET +0 8,938 318,530

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 327,639

 314

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 29

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 57

 0

 0

 86

 171

CORNING CANAL 171

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 8,938

TO SACTO RIVER 318,530

Table 9
### §4712. Funding of scholarships for fiscal year 1986 and fiscal year 1987

#### (a) Central American undergraduate scholarship program

The undergraduate scholarship program financed by the United States Information Agency for students from Central America for fiscal year 1986 and fiscal year 1987 shall be conducted in accordance with this chapter.

#### (b) Scholarships for students from other developing countries

Any funds appropriated to the United States Information Agency for fiscal year 1986 or fiscal year 1987 for any purpose (other than funds appropriated for educational exchange programs under section 2452(a)(1) of this title 1 may be used to carry out this chapter with respect to students from developing countries outside Central America.

(Pub. L. 99–93, title VI, §612, Aug. 16, 1985, 99 Stat. 443.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

United States Information Agency (other than Broadcasting Board of Governors and International Broadcasting Bureau) abolished and functions transferred to Secretary of State, see sections 6531 and 6532 of this title.

1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a closing parenthesis.
#### § 618.868 Unemployment Insurance.

UI payable to an AAW shall not be denied or reduced for any week by reason of any right to a payment of TAA under the Act and this part.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Richard F. Welch,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Richard F. Welch                                                                                                                 
|Richard F. Welch Chairman of the Board of Directors, Presidentand Chief Executive Officerof the Managing General Partner August 12, 2005
(No. 3975

#### Merna Mae Archer, widow, et al, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February*9, *1951.*

Nobel G. Johnson, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Merna Mae Archer, widow, and Judith Mae Archer, minor child of Marvin C. Archer, were granted an award in Case No. 3975, 16 C.C.R. 93.

Merna Mae Archer remarried on September 30, 1950, and her name is now Merna Mae Sauer. The minor child of the parties is still living, and the balance of said award is due and owing her.

The award heretofore entered in this cause on November 14, 1946 is hereby modified to the effect that the unpaid balance of $1,308.00 is payable as follows to Merna Mae Sauer, mother, next friend and natural guardian of Judith Mae Sauer, formerly Judith Mae Archer, minor:

The sum of $306.00 to February 6, 1951, which is due and payable forthwith;

The balance of $1,002.00 is payable to Merna Mae Sauer, mother, next friend and natural guardian of Judith Mae Sauer, formerly Judith Mae Archer, minor, in weekly installments of $18.00 each, commencing on February 13, 1951 for a period of 55 weeks with one final payment of $12.00.
#### Dorothea R. Turpin, as Administratrix, etc., v. William A. Turpin Company and Others.

Motion granted on condition stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
#### § 684.720 When must the 4-year plan be submitted?

The 4-year plans will be submitted as part of the competitive FOA process described at § 684.220. Accordingly, the due date for the submission of the 4-year plan will be specified in the FOA.
§ 408.1220 How do we pay Federally administered State recognition payments? ( a ) *Payment procedures.* We make Federally administered State recognition payments on a monthly basis and we include them in the same check as your SVB payment. The State recognition payment is for the same month as your SVB payment.
( b ) *Maximum amount.* Except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, there is no restriction on the amount of a State recognition payment that SSA will administer on behalf of a State.
( c ) *Minimum amount.* SSA will not administer State recognition payments in amounts less than $1 per month. Hence, recognition payment amounts of less than $1 will be raised to a dollar.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,022.34

 1,021.62

 1,020.76

 1,020.10

 1,019.39

 1,018.72

 1,017.94

 1,017.17

 1,016.44

 1,015.62

 1,014.84

 1,014.11

 1,013.29

 1,012.49

 1,011.63

 1,010.86

 1,010.10

 1,009.28

 1,008.46

 1,007.66

 1,006.73

 1,005.76

 1,004.77

 1,003.78

 1,002.86

 1,001.91

 1,001.04

 1,000.22

 999.54

 998.79

 997.99

 3,343.5

 3,326.0

 3,305.2

 3,289.3

 3,272.2

 3,256.2

 3,237.5

 3,219.1

 3,201.8

 3,182.4

 3,164.1

 3,146.9

 3,127.8

 3,109.2

 3,089.3

 3,071.5

 3,054.0

 3,035.3

 3,016.6

 2,998.5

 2,977.5

 2,955.7

 2,933.6

 2,911.5

 2,891.2

 2,870.3

 2,851.2

 2,833.3

 2,818.6

 2,802.3

 2,785.0

STORAGE

-17.3

-17.5

-20.8

-15.9

-17.1

-16.1

-18.7

-18.3

-17.3

-19.4

-18.4

-17.1

-19.1

-18.6

-19.9

-17.8

-17.5

-18.8

-18.7

-18.1

-21.0

-21.8

-22.1

-22.0

-20.4

-20.9

-19.1

-17.9

-14.8

-16.3

-17.3

CHANGE

 4,655

 4,972

 2,496

 5,091

 4,469

 4,557

 3,957

 3,785

 4,226

 3,535

 3,780

 4,249

 3,448

 3,727

 3,412

 4,371

 3,872

 3,847

 3,139

 4,411

 3,364

 3,507

 3,460

 2,762

 3,741

 3,232

 3,146

 4,077

 4,673

 3,722

 3,226

INFLOW

 13,107

 13,543

 12,707

 12,840

 12,796

 12,401

 13,129

 12,746

 12,679

 13,052

 12,815

 12,626

 12,896

 12,868

 13,182

 13,056

 12,399

 13,006

 12,340

 13,359

 13,726

 14,231

 14,314

 13,553

 13,755

 13,511

 12,486

 12,800

 11,882

 11,677

 11,694

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 265

 243

 277

 269

 290

 268

 239

 287

 279

 257

 228

 255

 206

 239

 272

 271

 276

 295

 214

 200

 225

 264

 302

 307

 247

 265

 270

 288

 243

 242

 241

C.F.S.

 .37

 .34

 .39

 .38

 .41

 .38

 .34

 .41

 .40

 .37

 .33

 .37

 .30

 .35

 .40

 .40

 .41

 .44

 .32

 .30

 .34

 .40

 .46

 .47

 .38

 .41

 .42

 .45

 .38

 .38

 .38

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2004 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 23, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -576.0 118,909 401,176 0 0 8,024 11.88 .00

ACRE-FEET -576,000 235,856 795,733 0 0 15,916

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 795,733

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 795,733

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2004 .00

 3,360.8

Table 3