alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 507.92

 508.29

 508.65

 509.41

 509.83

 510.41

 510.93

 511.26

 511.67

 512.23

 512.92

 513.37

 513.77

 514.17

 515.25

 516.07

 516.62

 517.12

 517.71

 518.26

 518.71

 519.03

 519.49

 520.40

 521.55

 522.67

 523.39

 524.47

 1,599,469

 1,603,802

 1,608,022

 1,616,944

 1,621,881

 1,628,708

 1,634,837

 1,638,731

 1,643,573

 1,650,194

 1,658,365

 1,663,701

 1,668,450

 1,673,203

 1,686,059

 1,695,843

 1,702,417

 1,708,400

 1,715,470

 1,722,069

 1,727,475

 1,731,323

 1,736,859

 1,747,830

 1,761,727

 1,775,299

 1,784,043

 1,797,186

STORAGE

+3,510

+4,333

+4,220

+8,922

+4,937

+6,827

+6,129

+3,894

+4,842

+6,621

+8,171

+5,336

+4,749

+4,753

+12,856

+9,784

+6,574

+5,983

+7,070

+6,599

+5,406

+3,848

+5,536

+10,971

+13,897

+13,572

+8,744

+13,143

CHANGE

2,244

2,536

2,530

5,137

2,796

3,979

3,564

2,336

2,717

3,631

4,322

3,075

2,652

2,802

6,964

5,246

3,887

3,304

3,658

3,660

3,147

2,143

2,780

5,275

7,385

7,300

4,884

7,230

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 235

 246

 242

 256

 256

 198

 155

 157

 140

 133

 129

 126

 123

 136

 137

 136

 147

 155

 146

 143

 130

 105

 125

 116

 115

 122

 132

 254

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-239

-106

-160

-383

-51

-339

-319

-216

-136

-160

-73

-259

-135

-270

-346

-177

-425

-133

+52

-191

-292

-98

+136

+373

-264

-336

-343

-350

OR

 61

 19

 8

 30

 57

 53

 76

 80

 57

 23

 23

 35

 38

 35

 35

 15

 46

 35

 35

 39

 0

 66

 43

 0

 8

 63

 31

 55

C.F.S.

 .16

 .05

 .02

 .08

 .15

 .14

 .20

 .21

 .15

 .06

 .06

 .09

 .10

 .09

 .09

 .04

 .12

 .09

 .09

 .10

 .00

 .17

 .11

 .00

 .02

 .16

 .08

 .14

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .35

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .37

 .01

 .06

 .00

 .42

 .46

 .27

 .01

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR March 26, 2001

DAILY OPERATIONS

FEBRUARY 2001 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +201,227 111,184 0 4,495 0 -5,240 1,066 2.77 2.43

ACRE-FEET +201,227 220,533 0 8,916 0 -10,394 2,114

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 8,916 TOTAL 8,916

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2000 TO DATE = 7.67

 1,595,959

SPILL 0 2.43

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 4,205

 3,483

 5,629

 9,057

 10,188

 16,658

 9,009

 9,228

 8,708

 11,707

 66,542

 33,631

 18,589

 13,742

 10,751

 11,132

 18,171

 18,923

 29,322

 29,529

 25,372

 17,930

 15,285

 11,908

 11,429

 9,570

 9,209

 8,419

 7,635

 7,545

 6,962

 62,675

 63,536

 63,668

 65,832

 71,144

 77,266

 89,228

 93,325

 97,425

 100,826

 106,907

 164,776

 188,487

 196,722

 199,941

 200,157

 200,725

 207,951

 215,530

 232,610

 249,032

 260,684

 264,683

 265,970

 263,984

 261,642

 257,651

 253,517

 248,840

 243,651

 238,636

 252,122

 254,587

 258,788

 263,140

 268,064

 273,525

 278,804

 284,402

 8,976

 18,127

 27,639

 37,471

 47,715

 58,425

 69,478

 80,998

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: January 5, 2015

 66,880

 67,019

 69,297

 74,889

 81,332

 93,924

 98,237

 102,553

 106,133

 112,533

 173,449

 198,407

 207,076

 210,464

 210,692

 211,289

 218,896

 226,874

 244,852

 262,139

 274,404

 278,614

 279,968

 277,878

 275,413

 271,212

 266,860

 261,936

 256,475

 251,196

 245,598

 1,291,024

 1,281,873

 1,272,361

 1,262,529

 1,252,285

 1,241,575

 1,230,522

 1,219,002

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,261,000

 3,270,000

 3,280,000

 3,289,000

 3,300,000

 3,310,000

 3,321,000

 3,333,000

 0.0356

 0.0712

 0.1068

 0.1424

 0.1780

 0.2136

 0.2492

 0.2848

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 65,973
487 P.2d 923

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond A. MARTINEZ, DefendantAppellant.

No. 691.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

July 16, 1971.

Lowell E. McKim, Denny, Glascock & McKim, Gallup, for defendant-appellant.

David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., C. Emery Cuddy, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction of four counts of unlawfully selling marijuana. Section 54-5-14, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 8, pt. 2). The defendant claims he was entrapped as a matter of law and the trial court erred in submitting the issue of entrapment to the jury.

*14State v. Sanchez, *79*N.M. 701, 448 P.2d 807 (Ct.App.1968) states:

> "* * ***A defendant can be said to have been entrapped only when the officers or agents originate the criminal intent or design and use undue persuasion or enticement to induce defendant to commit the crime with which he is charged. He has not been entrapped if the officers or agents merely offer him an opportunity to commit an offense which he is ready and willing to commit. * * * *”*

Defendant testified that he never had anything to do with narcotics prior to the 'episodes involved in this case. He admitted the marijuana sales. In response to a question as to what conversations he had with Warren, the undercover agent, the defendant testified:

> "Yes, sir. He suggested that' — he kept asking me all the time about marijuana, or whether I could obtain any, and being that I had financial difficulties and my wife was expecting a baby and the daughter having problems, I gave it my most consideration for almost a month or two, and I finally told Mr. Warren that I could get marijuana so that we could make a profit from it.”

Defendant’s testimony raises a factual issue as to whether the agent used "undue persuasion or enticement to induce Defendant to commit the crime.” Entrapment did not occur merely because the undercover agent offered defendant an opportunity to involve himself in marijuana sales. In addition, there must be improper inducement. State v. Akin, 75 N.M. 308, 404 P.2d 134*(1965);*State v. Roybal, 65 N.M. 342, 337 P.2d 406 (1959). According to defendant, he was having “financial difficulties.” He gave the agent’s suggestion his “most consideration for almost a month or two” before deciding to obtain the marijuana and “finally” agreed' to involve himself in marijuana for a profit. This testimony raised a factual issue as to whether the criminal conduct was the product of the creative activity of the agent. State v. Sena, 82 N.M. 513, 484 P.2d 355 (Ct.App.1971). There being a factual issue, the trial court properly refused to find entrapment as a matter of law.

The judgment and sentence is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

HENDLEY and SUTIN, JJ., concur.
### §§7531 to 7538. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 7531 to 7538 of this title were omitted pursuant to section 7538 of this title, which provided that the authority of this subchapter expired after Sept. 30, 2006.

Section 7531, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §201, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2807, related to sense of Congress regarding United States support for security during transition in Afghanistan.

Section 7532, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §202, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2807; Pub. L. 108–106, title II, §2206, Nov. 6, 2003, 117 Stat. 1231; Pub. L. 108–287, title IX, §9008, Aug. 5, 2004, 118 Stat. 1008, provided authorization of drawdown assistance for Afghanistan and other eligible foreign countries and international organizations.

Section 7533, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §203, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2807, described eligibility criteria for foreign countries and international organizations to receive assistance under section 7532 of this title.

Section 7534, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §204, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2808, related to reimbursement to the Department of Defense for assistance.

Section 7535, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §205, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2808, required the President to notify certain congressional committees before providing assistance under this subchapter.

Section 7536, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §206, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2808; Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7104(h)(2), (i), (k)(1), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3786, 3788, related to promoting secure delivery of humanitarian and other assistance in Afghanistan and expansion of the International Security Assistance Force.

Section 7536a, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §207, as added Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7104(j)(2)(B), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3787, related to sense of Congress regarding counter-drug activities in Afghanistan and required the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to prepare a joint report regarding counter-drug efforts in Afghanistan.

Section 7537, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §208, formerly §207, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2811; renumbered §208, Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7104(j)(2)(A), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3787, related to relationship to other legal authority to provide assistance.

Section 7538, Pub. L. 107–327, title II, §209, formerly §208, Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2811; renumbered §209, Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7104(j)(2)(A), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3787, provided that the authority of this subchapter would expire after Sept. 30, 2006.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 442.72

 442.45

 442.60

 442.06

 441.66

 440.70

 440.10

 439.95

 439.22

 438.85

 438.53

 437.94

 437.90

 437.58

 437.10

 436.63

 436.15

 435.83

 435.49

 435.00

 434.50

 433.90

 433.47

 433.00

 432.68

 432.24

 431.71

 430.91

 430.50

 429.90

 429.34

 900,990

 898,382

 899,830

 894,619

 890,765

 881,538

 875,787

 874,352

 867,377

 863,849

 860,801

 855,192

 854,813

 851,776

 847,228

 842,783

 838,252

 835,235

 832,034

 827,429

 822,738

 817,121

 813,104

 808,721

 805,741

 801,650

 796,732

 789,328

 785,542

 780,013

 774,865

STORAGE

-2,611

-2,608

+1,448

-5,211

-3,854

-9,227

-5,751

-1,435

-6,975

-3,528

-3,048

-5,609

-379

-3,037

-4,548

-4,445

-4,531

-3,017

-3,201

-4,605

-4,691

-5,617

-4,017

-4,383

-2,980

-4,091

-4,918

-7,404

-3,786

-5,529

-5,148

CHANGE

2,599

3,155

3,781

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 3,234

 4,125

 2,508

 2,434

 1,566

 4,289

 3,160

 0

 3,293

 1,453

 1,173

 2,610

 0

 1,106

 1,991

 2,018

 2,018

 1,173

 1,320

 1,958

 1,958

 2,604

 1,932

 1,924

 1,154

 1,735

 2,295

 3,144

 1,705

 2,535

 2,535

POWER

 242

 269

 0

 547

 261

 246

 252

 221

 252

 244

 225

 232

 246

 247

 222

 252

 249

 255

 267

 266

 251

 209

 276

 283

 285

 272

 270

 265

 233

 257

 294

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-439

-76

-543

+353

-115

-117

+512

-503

+28

-82

-138

+14

+55

-178

-79

+29

-18

-93

-27

-98

-157

-19

+183

-3

-64

-56

+85

-324

+30

+4

+234

OR

 213

 203

 203

 168

 168

 171

 174

 171

 120

 139

 160

 138

 138

 129

 138

 153

 128

 159

 137

 137

 167

 136

 144

 135

 144

 255

 225

 152

 164

 89

 110

C.F.S.

 .68

 .65

 .65

 .54

 .54

 .55

 .56

 .55

 .39

 .45

 .52

 .45

 .45

 .42

 .45

 .50

 .42

 .52

 .45

 .45

 .55

 .45

 .48

 .45

 .48

 .85

 .75

 .51

 .55

 .30

 .37

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR October 8, 2010

DAILY OPERATIONS

AUGUST 2010 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -128,736 9,535 64,950 7,890 0 -1,602 4,868 15.93 .00

ACRE-FEET -128,736 18,913 128,828 15,650 0 -3,178 9,656

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 128,828

PACHECO TUNNEL 15,650 TOTAL 144,478

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2010 TO DATE = .00

 903,601

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.
(No. 74-CC-146

#### J. C. Penney Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 8, 1974.*

J. C. Penney Co., Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 707.84

 707.95

 708.06

 708.16

 708.28

 708.38

 708.47

 708.56

 708.66

 708.81

 708.96

 709.07

 709.18

 709.28

 709.38

 709.48

 709.58

 709.68

 709.85

 709.91

 709.99

 710.05

 710.12

 710.18

 710.24

 710.31

 709.17

 707.35

 707.45

 707.56

 801

 804

 807

 809

 813

 816

 818

 821

 823

 828

 832

 835

 838

 841

 844

 846

 849

 852

 857

 858

 861

 863

 865

 866

 868

 870

 838

 787

 790

 793

STORAGE

+4

+3

+3

+2

+4

+3

+2

+3

+2

+5

+4

+3

+3

+3

+3

+2

+3

+3

+5

+1

+3

+2

+2

+1

+2

+2

-32

-51

+3

+3

CHANGE

3

3

3

2

3

3

2

3

2

4

3

3

3

3

3

2

3

3

4

2

3

2

2

2

2

2

-7

-15

3

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 9

 11

 1

 1

 1000

 1010

 1020

 1000

TIME

 .21

 .22

 .22

 .22

COPPER

 .82

 .92

 .90

 .90

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2007 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 13, 2008

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -4 54 0 48

ACRE-FEET -4 107 0 95

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 95

 95

 797

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

 .001

 .001

 .001

 .001

Table 7
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 2011** 

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. ATTORNEY RICHARD DURHAM , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 5:11

- cv - 00036

- H )

Submitted : November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
William Scott Davis, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Scott Davis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s text order denying h is Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final jud gment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a ci vil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on May 5, 2016 . The notice of appeal was filed on August 30, 2016
. *
Because Davis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We deny all pending motions, including Davis’ motion s to consolidate and to appoint a guardian ad litem. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S . 266 (1988).3 l egal contentions are adequately presented in the m aterials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
### Fw: the 2/7 file transfer Paul Shriner to: Lisa Sutton 02/08/2013 02:28 PM ----- Forwarded by Paul Shriner/DC/USEPA/US on 02/08/2013 02:28 PM ----- From: Paul Shriner/DC/USEPA/US To: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan

_ J.

_ Frey@omb.eop.gov> Date: 02/07/2013 06:51 PM Subject: SSM SIP - proposal draft 

### 2/7/13 comparison draft, 323 pages EO12866_SSM Petition_2060-AR68_Proposal_FRN_20121126_compar as of 2-7-2013.docx 

### 2/7/13 clean draft EO12866_SSM Petition_2060-AR68_Proposal_FRN_20121126_as of 2-7-2013.docx 

### original file with comment bubbles Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_13563_SSM_Petition_2060-AR68_Proposedrule_acceptedAllChanges.docx
#### Starlight Fabrics, Inc., Respondent, v. Glens Falls Insurance Company, Appellant.

Determination of the Appellate Term affirmed, with costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Van Voorhis, JJ.; Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the determination of the Appellate Term and affirm the judgment of the City Court on the ground that at the time when the goods were stolen they were not in transit as required by the provisions of the policy. [189 Misc. 470.] [See *post,*p. 807.]
§ 685.470 How can grantees request a waiver? To request a waiver, a grantee must submit to the Department a waiver plan that: ( a ) Describes the goals of the waiver, the expected programmatic outcomes, and how the waiver will improve the provision of program activities;
( b ) Is consistent with any guidelines the Department establishes;
( c ) Describes the data that will be collected to track the impact of the waiver; and
( d ) Includes a modified program plan reflecting the effect of the requested waiver.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4372 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, as 

the Barry G. Miller Post Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4372 EH

1 SECTION 1. BARRY G. MILLER POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 15 Rochester Street, Bergen, 

4 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Barry 

5 G. Miller Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Barry G. Miller Post 

10 Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 21, 2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4372 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice. gen, New York, as the Barry G. Miller Post Of- al Service located at 15 Rochester Street, Ber-
§ 641.420 What are the eligibility criteria that each applicant must meet? To be eligible to receive SCSEP funds, each applicant must demonstrate: ( a ) An ability to administer a program that serves the greatest number of eligible participants, giving particular consideration to individuals with greatest economic need, individuals with greatest social need, and individuals described in § 641.570(b) or § 641.520(a)(2) through (a)(8).
( b ) An ability to administer a program that provides employment in community service assignments for eligible individuals in communities in which they reside, or in nearby communities, that will contribute to the general welfare of the community;
( c ) An ability to administer a program that moves eligible participants into unsubsidized employment;
( d ) Where the applicant has previously received a SCSEP grant, the applicant's prior performance in meeting SCSEP core measures of performance and addressing SCSEP additional measures of performance; and where the applicant has not received a SCSEP grant, the applicant's prior performance under other Federal or State programs; relevant past performance will also be used for scoring criterion and will be set forth more fully in the Solicitation for Grant Applications (see § 641.460);
( e ) An ability to move participants with multiple barriers to employment, including individuals described in § 641.570(b) or § 641.520(a)(2) through (9), into unsubsidized employment;
( f ) An ability to coordinate activities with other organizations at the State and local levels, including the One-Stop delivery system;
( g ) An ability to properly manage the program, as reflected in its plan for fiscal management of the SCSEP;
( h ) An ability to administer a project that provides community service;
( i ) An ability to minimize program disruption for current participants and in community services provided if there is a change in project sponsor and/or location, and its plan for minimizing disruptions;
( j ) Any additional criteria that the Department deems appropriate to minimize disruptions for current participants. (OAA § 514(c)).
[75 FR 53812, Sept. 1, 2010, as amended at 87 FR 8189, Feb. 14, 2022]