alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 500.16

 500.88

 501.36

 501.85

 502.34

 502.90

 503.35

 503.84

 504.52

 505.05

 505.58

 506.34

 507.19

 507.98

 508.82

 509.77

 510.55

 511.29

 512.16

 513.08

 513.98

 514.76

 515.49

 516.13

 516.80

 517.52

 518.34

 518.93

 519.49

 520.20

 520.55

 1,509,517

 1,517,788

 1,523,311

 1,528,955

 1,534,607

 1,541,075

 1,546,280

 1,551,953

 1,559,838

 1,565,994

 1,572,157

 1,581,010

 1,590,932

 1,600,172

 1,610,016

 1,621,175

 1,630,357

 1,639,085

 1,649,366

 1,660,262

 1,670,945

 1,680,222

 1,688,921

 1,696,560

 1,704,570

 1,713,192

 1,723,030

 1,730,120

 1,736,859

 1,745,417

 1,749,640

STORAGE

+6,996

+8,271

+5,523

+5,644

+5,652

+6,468

+5,205

+5,673

+7,885

+6,156

+6,163

+8,853

+9,922

+9,240

+9,844

+11,159

+9,182

+8,728

+10,281

+10,896

+10,683

+9,277

+8,699

+7,639

+8,010

+8,622

+9,838

+7,090

+6,739

+8,558

+4,223

CHANGE

3,770

4,729

3,121

3,190

3,188

3,172

3,165

3,143

4,406

3,358

3,632

4,884

5,622

4,988

5,092

5,573

5,022

4,734

5,519

5,816

5,759

5,253

4,752

4,331

4,560

4,594

5,284

3,930

3,528

4,568

1,909

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 115

 121

 118

 136

 136

 131

 138

 125

 128

 129

 126

 131

 139

 109

 75

 72

 75

 83

 84

 98

 0

 0

 0

 120

 119

 121

 120

 71

 50

 51

 440

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-128

-438

-218

-209

-202

+219

-403

-158

-303

-126

-399

-289

-481

-220

-54

+124

-318

-251

-252

-225

-373

-576

-366

-360

-403

-126

-203

-285

-80

-203

+660

OR

 70

 0

 7

 34

 19

 15

 19

 0

 23

 23

 4

 19

 8

 11

 0

 23

 111

 19

 27

 27

 38

 15

 58

 4

 19

 27

 19

 31

 8

 16

 27

C.F.S.

 .19

 .00

 .02

 .09

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .00

 .06

 .06

 .01

 .05

 .02

 .03

 .00

 .06

 .29

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .10

 .04

 .15

 .01

 .05

 .07

 .05

 .08

 .02

 .04

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .58

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .00

 .05

 .19

 .49

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR February 28, 2019

DAILY OPERATIONS

JANUARY 2019 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +247,119 134,592 0 3,361 0 -6,646 721 1.89 1.77

ACRE-FEET +247,119 266,963 0 6,667 0 -13,182 1,430

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 0

PACHECO TUNNEL 6,667 TOTAL 6,667

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2018 TO DATE = 4.65

 1,502,521

SPILL 0 1.77

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 4.65
§ 404.1401 What is the interrelationship between the Railroad Retirement Act and the Old-Age, Survivors and Disability Insurance Program of the Social Security Act? ( a ) *Background.* The Railroad Retirement Act provides a system of benefits for railroad employees, their dependents and survivors, and is integrated with the Social Security Act to provide a coordinated system of retirement, survivor, dependent and disability benefits payable on the basis of an individual's work in the railroad industry and in employment and self-employment covered by the Social Security Act. With respect to the coordination between the two programs, the Railroad Retirement Act distinguishes between “career” or “vested” railroad workers and those individuals who may be considered “casual” or “non-vested” railroad workers based on the total amount of railroad service credited to the worker, as explained in paragraph (b) of this section. The Railroad Retirement Board transfers to the Social Security Administration (SSA) the compensation records of workers who at the time of retirement, onset of disability or death, are non-vested and meet certain other requirements. Any compensation paid to non-vested workers for service after 1936 becomes wages under the Social Security Act (to the extent they do not exceed the annual wage limitations described in § 404.1047). Any benefits payable to non-vested workers, their dependents, and their survivors, are computed on the basis of the combined compensation and social security covered earnings creditable to the workers' records. Once a railroad worker meets the vesting requirements, the record of the worker's railroad service and compensation generally may not be used for benefit purposes under the Social Security Act, but under certain circumstances may be transferred after the worker's death to SSA for use in determining social security benefit entitlement for the railroad worker's survivors (*see* § 404.1407). Under certain circumstances (*see* § 404.1413), certification of benefits payable under the provisions of the Social Security Act will be made to the Railroad Retirement Board. The Railroad Retirement Board will certify such benefits to the Secretary of the Treasury.
( b ) *Who is a vested railroad worker?* You are a vested railroad worker if you have: ( 1 ) Ten years or more of service in the railroad industry, or
( 2 ) Effective January 1, 2002, you have at least 5 years of service in the railroad industry, all of which accrue after December 31, 1995.
( c ) *Definition of years of service.* As used in paragraph (b) of this section, the term *years of service* has the same meaning as assigned to it by section 1(f) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, as amended, (45 U.S.C. 231(f)).
[69 FR 5692, Feb. 6, 2004]
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4380 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove limitations on 

the ability of certain dual citizens from participating in the Visa Waiver 

Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2016 

Mr. AMASH (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. DINGELL, and Mr. MASSIE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to remove 

limitations on the ability of certain dual citizens from 

participating in the Visa Waiver Program, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Protection in 

5 Travel Act of 2016’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4380 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF LIMITATIONS OF CERTAIN DUAL CITI2 ZENS FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE VISA 

3 WAIVER PROGRAM. 

4 Section 217(a)(12) of the Immigration and Nation5 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (A)— 

7 (A) by striking clause (ii); 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘(C)—’’ and all that fol9 lows through ‘‘the alien has not been present’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘(C), the alien has not been 

11 present’’; and 

12 (C) by redesignating subclauses (I), (II), 

13 and (III) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii); and 

14 (2) in subparagraph (B), in the matter pre15 ceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘(A)(i)’’ and inserting 

16 ‘‘(A)’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF ACORN  HOLDING CORP.  FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000737243
<NAME>                    ACORN HOLDING CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         863,229
<SECURITIES>                                   265,781
<RECEIVABLES>                                  416,017
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1,865,528
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,939,867
<PP&E>                                         1,918,488
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,424,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,549,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          625,122
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       40,684
<OTHER-SE>                                     7,508,861
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,549,545
<SALES>                                        1,980,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,980,924
<CGS>                                          1,693,988
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,463,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (420,352)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   75,994
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (496,346)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.305)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.305)



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 73 (Friday, April 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21385-21386]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, Member Conflict: Musculoskeletal, Oral and Skin Sciences.
    Date: May 13, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville Hotel, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Rajiv Kumar, PhD, Chief, MOSS IRG, Center for 
Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 4216, MSC 7802, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-1212, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#701b051d11020211301303025e1e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f544a525e4d4d5e7f5c4c4d1151565711585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Integrative, Functional and Cognitive 
Neuroscience

[[Page 21386]]

Integrated Review Group, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory Study 
Section.
    Date: May 26, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: One Washington Circle Hotel, One Washington Circle, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: John Bishop, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5182, MSC 7844, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 408-
9664, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04666d776c6b746e446777762a6a6d6c2a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="75171c061d1a051f351606075b1b1c1d5b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: April 8, 2011.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9132 Filed 4-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 662.300 What is the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)? ( a ) The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is an agreement developed and executed between the Local Board, with the agreement of the chief elected official, and the One-Stop partners relating to the operation of the One-Stop delivery system in the local area.
( b ) The MOU must contain the provisions required by WIA section 121(c)(2). These provisions cover services to be provided through the One-Stop delivery system; the funding of the services and operating costs of the system; and methods for referring individuals between the One-Stop operators and partners. The MOU's provisions also must determine the duration and procedures for amending the MOU, and may contain any other provisions that are consistent with WIA title I and the WIA regulations agreed to by the parties. (WIA sec. 121(c).)
§ 663.420 Can the duration and amount of ITA's be limited? ( a ) Yes, the State or Local Board may impose limits on ITA's, such as limitations on the dollar amount and/or duration.
( b ) Limits to ITA's may be established in different ways: ( 1 ) There may be a limit for an individual participant that is based on the needs identified in the individual employment plan; or
( 2 ) There may be a policy decision by the State Board or Local Board to establish a range of amounts and/or a maximum amount applicable to all ITA's.
( c ) Limitations established by State or Local Board policies must be described in the State or Local Plan, respectively, but should not be implemented in a manner that undermines the Act's requirement that training services are provided in a manner that maximizes customer choice in the selection of an eligible training provider. ITA limitations may provide for exceptions to the limitations in individual cases.
( d ) An individual may select training that costs more than the maximum amount available for ITAs under a State or local policy when other sources of funds are available to supplement the ITA. These other sources may include: Pell Grants; scholarships; severance pay; and other sources.
### §5828. Funding for OPIC programs

#### (a) Authority to make additional funds available

Funds authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1993 to carry out chapter 11 of part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2295 et seq.] may be made available to cover costs incurred by the Overseas Private Investment Corporation in carrying out programs with respect to the independent states of the former Soviet Union under title IV of chapter 2 of part I of that Act (22 U.S.C. 2191 and following),1 in addition to amounts otherwise available for that purpose.

#### (b) Enactment of OPIC Authorization Act

The authority of subsection (a) shall cease to be effective upon the enactment of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation Act Amendments Act of 1992.

(Pub. L. 102–511, title III, §308, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3335.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsec. (a), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Chapter 11 of part I of the Act is classified generally to part II (§2295 et seq.) of subchapter I of chapter 32 of this title. Title IV of chapter 2 of part I of the Act, which was classified generally to subpart IV (§2191 et seq.) of part II of subchapter I of chapter 32 of this title, was repealed, except for subsections (g), (l), (m), and (n) of section 2197 of this title, by Pub. L. 115–254, div. F, title VI, §1464(2), Oct. 5, 2018, 132 Stat. 3513, effective at the end of the transition period, as defined in section 9681 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

The Overseas Private Investment Corporation Act Amendments Act of 1992, referred to in subsec. (b), probably means the Overseas Private Investment Corporation Amendments Act of 1992, which was title I of H.R. 4996, 102d Congress, as passed by the House of Representatives. H.R. 4996 was enacted into law as Pub. L. 102–549 and title I was significantly revised and no longer contained provisions designating it as the Overseas Private Investment Corporation Amendments Act of 1992.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Transfer of Functions

For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the Overseas Private Investment Corporation to the United States International Development Finance Corporation and treatment of related references, see sections 9683 and 9686(d) of this title.

1 See References in Text note below.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7727

CHARLES HATFIELD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-247-JFM) Submitted: April 20, 1999 Decided: May 21, 1999Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Charles Hatfield, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles Hatfield seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Hatfield v. Beshears , No. CA-98- 247-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered December 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00774-CV

ROHRMOOS VENTURE, ET AL., Appellants

V.

UTSW DVA HEALTHCARE, LLP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-15959

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ December 5, 2014 unopposed motion for leave to file a 

corrected appellants’ brief. Appellants shall file an amended brief correcting the citations to the 

reporter’s record by DECEMBER 22, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
### §5322. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the international debt problem threatens the safety and soundness of the international financial system, the stability of the international trading system, and the economic development of the debtor countries;

(2) orderly reduction of international trade imbalances requires very substantial growth in all parts of the world economy, particularly in the developing countries;

(3) growth in developing countries with substantial external debts has been significantly constrained over the last several years by a combination of high debt service obligations and insufficient new flows of financial resources to these countries;

(4) substantial interest payment outflows from debtor countries, combined with inadequate net new capital inflows, have produced a significant net transfer of financial resources from debtor to creditor countries;

(5) negative resource transfers at present levels severely depress both investment and growth in the debtor countries, and force debtor countries to reduce imports and expand exports in order to meet their debt service obligations;

(6) current adjustment policies in debtor countries, which depress domestic demand and increase production for export, help to depress world commodity prices and limit the growth of export markets for United States industries;

(7) the United States has borne a disproportionate share of the burden of absorbing increased exports from debtor countries, while other industrialized countries have increased their imports from developing countries only slightly;

(8) current approaches to the debt problem should not rely solely on new lending as a solution to the debt problem, and should focus on other financing alternatives including a reduction in current debt service obligations;

(9) new international mechanisms to improve the management of the debt problem and to expand the range of financing options available to developing countries should be explored; and

(10) industrial countries with strong current account surpluses have a disproportionate share of the world's capital resources, and bear an additional responsibility for contributing to a viable long-term solution to the debt problem.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3102, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1375.)
§ 664.410 Must local programs include each of the ten program elements listed in WIA section 129(c)(2) as options available to youth participants? ( a ) Yes, local programs must make the following services available to youth participants: ( 1 ) Tutoring, study skills training, and instruction leading to secondary school completion, including dropout prevention strategies;
( 2 ) Alternative secondary school offerings;
( 3 ) Summer employment opportunities directly linked to academic and occupational learning;
( 4 ) Paid and unpaid work experiences, including internships and job shadowing, as provided in §§ 664.460 and 664.470;
( 5 ) Occupational skill training;
( 6 ) Leadership development opportunities, which include community service and peer-centered activities encouraging responsibility and other positive social behaviors;
( 7 ) Supportive services, which may include the services listed in § 664.440;
( 8 ) Adult mentoring for a duration of at least twelve (12) months, that may occur both during and after program participation;
( 9 ) Followup services, as provided in § 664.450; and
( 10 ) Comprehensive guidance and counseling, including drug and alcohol abuse counseling, as well as referrals to counseling, as appropriate to the needs of the individual youth.
( b ) Local programs have the discretion to determine what specific program services will be provided to a youth participant, based on each participant's objective assessment and individual service strategy. (WIA sec. 129(c)(2).)