alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 382.92

 382.91

 382.89

 383.28

 383.44

 383.70

 383.95

 384.21

 384.45

 384.57

 384.32

 384.76

 385.06

 385.71

 386.42

 386.80

 387.08

 387.34

 388.04

 388.66

 389.17

 389.42

 389.73

 389.96

 390.48

 391.01

 392.46

 393.85

 394.77

 395.62

 393,798

 393,727

 393,583

 396,379

 397,528

 399,398

 401,199

 403,075

 404,809

 405,678

 403,869

 407,054

 409,230

 413,960

 419,150

 421,937

 423,995

 425,909

 431,079

 435,677

 439,473

 441,338

 443,655

 445,376

 449,278

 453,268

 464,249

 474,867

 481,943

 488,516

STORAGE

+0

-71

-144

+2,796

+1,149

+1,870

+1,801

+1,876

+1,734

+869

-1,809

+3,185

+2,176

+4,730

+5,190

+2,787

+2,058

+1,914

+5,170

+4,598

+3,796

+1,865

+2,317

+1,721

+3,902

+3,990

+10,981

+10,618

+7,076

+6,573

CHANGE

0

0

0

1,791

805

1,063

1,060

1,055

1,038

1,035

1,170

1,823

1,238

2,621

2,902

1,601

1,165

1,165

2,953

2,844

2,746

1,242

1,242

2,507

3,500

3,495

5,972

5,868

3,828

3,682

PUMPING

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 480

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 490

 494

 0

 0

 1,204

 1,200

 1,201

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 13

 14

 14

 14

 15

 13

 9

 12

 12

 13

 15

 14

 9

 10

 12

 15

 13

 14

 15

 17

 16

 16

 17

 17

 17

 18

 19

 17

 17

 23

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+13

-22

-59

-368

-211

-107

-143

-97

-151

-104

-2,068

-203

-132

-226

-274

-180

-114

-187

-332

-19

-323

-286

-57

-418

-316

-265

-417

-498

-244

-346

OR

 26

 20

 39

 26

 23

 23

 19

 26

 16

 31

 33

 35

 33

 12

 28

 24

 24

 19

 14

 14

 10

 12

 17

 24

 19

 15

 22

 12

 15

 35

C.F.S.

 .11

 .09

 .17

 .11

 .10

 .10

 .08

 .11

 .07

 .13

 .14

 .15

 .14

 .05

 .12

 .10

 .10

 .08

 .06

 .06

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .10

 .08

 .06

 .09

 .05

 .06

 .14

INCHES

 .86

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .18

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .21

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR January 16, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2014 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +94,718 61,411 5,069 440 0 -8,154 666 2.81 1.34

ACRE-FEET +94,718 121,809 10,054 873 0 -16,173 1,321

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 10,054

PACHECO TUNNEL 873 TOTAL 10,927

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2014 TO DATE = 1.47

 393,798

SPILL 0 1.34

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,402

 1,604

 1,610

 1,892

 1,306

 1,555

 1,125

 1,095

 1,256

 1,878

 2,907

 5,896

 5,528

 4,720

 4,364

 2,285

 2,703

 1,728

 1,342

 1,232

 1,546

 593

 394

 470

 398

 356

 290

 307

 232

 216

 296

 360

 366

 357

 363

 332

 342

 304

 298

 319

 313

 581

 776

 711

 686

 482

 395

 373

 330

 300

 307

 361

 246

 261

 245

 227

 216

 210

 196

 178

 640

 664

 629

 687

 569

 627

 580

 551

 595

 886

 1,280

 2,365

 2,713

 1,920

 1,591

 1,017

 852

 654

 539

 504

 535

 423

 298

 345

 303

 268

 241

 230

 210

 194

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 8, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
**Exhibit 15.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

China Medical Technologies, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-139777) on Form F-3 and registration statement (No. 333-138954) on Form S-8 of China Medical Technologies, Inc. of our reports datedJune 27, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the China Medical Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2007 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income,shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2008 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008, which reportsappear in the March 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of China Medical Technologies, Inc.. 

Our report on the consolidated financialstatements refers to a change in the method of accounting for employee share-based arrangements as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, effective April 1, 2006.

Our report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Companyacquired Beijing Bio-Ekon Biotechnology Co., Ltd. during the year ended March 31, 2008 and management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2008,Beijing Bio-Ekon Biotechnology Co., Ltd.’s internal control over financial reporting associated with total assets of RMB233,408,000 and total revenues of RMB4,765,000 included in the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of andfor the year ended March 31, 2008, and our audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Beijing Bio-Ekon Biotechnology Co., Ltd..

/s/    KPMG 

Hong Kong, China 

June 27, 2008
#### § 234.60 Escheat.

Any payment under this part which would be payable to any state, political subdivision of a state, the U.S. government or a foreign government because of the lack of a legal heir, shall remain in the Railroad Retirement Account.
§ 418.3310 Whose income do we count? ( a ) We count your income. If you are married and live with your spouse in the month you file for a subsidy, or when we redetermine your eligibility for a subsidy as described in § 418.3125, we count your income and your spouse's income regardless of whether one or both of you apply or are eligible for the subsidy.
( b ) We will determine your eligibility based on your income alone if you are not married or if you are married but you are separated from your spouse (*i.e.*, you or your spouse move out of the household and you are no longer living with your spouse) at the time you apply for a subsidy or when we redetermine your eligibility for a subsidy as described in § 418.3125.
( c ) If your subsidy is based on your income and your spouse's income and we redetermine your subsidy as described in § 418.3120(b)(1), we will stop counting the income of your spouse in the month following the month that we receive a report that your marriage ended due to death, divorce, or annulment; or a report that you and your spouse stopped living together.
( d ) If your subsidy is based on your income and your spouse's income, we will continue counting the income of both you and your spouse if one of you is temporarily away from home as described in § 404.347 of this chapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 442.93

 442.48

 442.08

 441.73

 441.55

 441.47

 441.88

 442.10

 442.41

 442.63

 443.04

 443.37

 443.78

 444.24

 444.80

 445.05

 445.23

 445.62

 445.92

 446.21

 446.47

 446.72

 447.03

 447.37

 447.47

 447.69

 448.22

 448.74

 449.22

 449.42

 449.85

 903,021

 898,671

 894,811

 891,439

 889,706

 888,936

 892,884

 895,004

 897,996

 900,120

 904,085

 907,280

 911,255

 915,722

 921,169

 923,605

 925,360

 929,166

 932,097

 934,934

 937,479

 939,929

 942,970

 946,309

 947,292

 949,455

 954,673

 959,803

 964,545

 966,524

 970,782

STORAGE

-3,193

-4,350

-3,860

-3,372

-1,733

-770

+3,948

+2,120

+2,992

+2,124

+3,965

+3,195

+3,975

+4,467

+5,447

+2,436

+1,755

+3,806

+2,931

+2,837

+2,545

+2,450

+3,041

+3,339

+983

+2,163

+5,218

+5,130

+4,742

+1,979

+4,258

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

799

1,070

3,297

2,468

3,108

2,767

3,045

2,668

3,614

3,867

3,485

1,584

1,785

2,299

1,778

1,778

1,944

1,763

1,792

2,262

790

1,495

3,284

2,889

2,962

1,382

2,568

PUMPING

 1,335

 1,933

 1,557

 1,335

 1,335

 1,327

 668

 892

 1,339

 1,245

 595

 594

 1,190

 1,178

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 224

 218

 207

 213

 185

 210

 211

 208

 208

 220

 223

 201

 213

 219

 217

 212

 208

 201

 197

 204

 211

 208

 195

 184

 185

 175

 202

 191

 191

 193

 214

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-50

-42

-181

-152

-152

+79

-428

-300

-52

-231

-228

-261

-207

-218

-522

-143

-692

-179

-103

-144

-450

-320

-64

-395

-110

-230

-451

-112

-381

-192

-207

OR

 219

 240

 237

 190

 197

 233

 181

 197

 187

 188

 235

 197

 236

 204

 173

 158

 151

 199

 190

 205

 171

 137

 118

 143

 121

 105

 160

 131

 144

 128

 128

C.F.S.

 .70

 .77

 .76

 .61

 .63

 .75

 .58

 .63

 .60

 .60

 .75

 .63

 .75

 .65

 .55

 .50

 .48

 .63

 .60

 .65

 .54

 .43

 .37

 .45

 .38

 .33

 .50

 .41

 .45

 .40

 .40

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR September 14, 2018

DAILY OPERATIONS

AUGUST 2018 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +64,568 62,543 16,523 6,348 0 -7,118 5,503 17.48 .00

ACRE-FEET +64,568 124,054 32,773 12,591 0 -14,119 10,915

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 32,773

PACHECO TUNNEL 12,591 TOTAL 45,364

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2018 TO DATE = .00

 906,214

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 5.62
#### Elizabeth M. Nicholson, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Town of Stillwater, Appellant.

Judgment and order reversed on law and facts and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $15,000, in which case judgment may be so modified and as so modified judgment and order affirmed, without costs. All concurred, except Kellogg, J., who voted for reversal absolutely. The court finds that the damages to the plaintiff did not exceed the sum of $15,000, and disapproves of the finding of fact as to damages in excess thereof.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 6,615

 6,883

 7,237

 9,978

 9,273

 10,179

 11,294

 11,833

 12,919

 11,785

 12,435

 11,176

 10,540

 8,980

 7,184

 8,938

 8,321

 7,582

 8,829

 10,635

 11,218

 10,153

 9,681

 10,137

 9,470

 8,812

 7,064

 5,654

 4,314

 3,705

 3,572

 1,377

 1,335

 1,203

 2,316

 1,958

 1,776

 2,062

 2,504

 2,446

 2,240

 2,290

 2,308

 2,098

 2,287

 1,863

 1,895

 2,254

 1,677

 1,769

 1,933

 2,120

 1,833

 1,728

 1,863

 1,816

 1,942

 1,634

 1,356

 1,069

 872

 682

 4,105

 3,700

 3,817

 4,985

 4,560

 4,732

 5,472

 6,305

 6,729

 6,125

 6,213

 5,671

 5,518

 5,126

 4,488

 5,692

 4,141

 3,430

 3,904

 4,891

 5,586

 5,232

 4,857

 5,046

 4,964

 4,768

 3,713

 3,078

 2,344

 1,677

 1,376

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Warren S. Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Director of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties,
Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Warren S. Hoffman                                                                                    
|Warren S. Hoffman Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Managing General Partner August 14, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 11,668

 9,307

 10,328

 15,554

 32,788

 33,152

 23,917

 18,130

 15,231

 12,933

 13,820

 14,512

 16,281

 15,137

 13,479

 12,653

 12,345

 12,454

 11,051

 10,715

 9,658

 9,499

 10,884

 10,526

 10,337

 19,242

 21,682

 15,553

 270,855

 268,396

 263,818

 260,439

 262,193

 280,232

 297,715

 305,550

 307,496

 306,591

 303,548

 301,499

 300,211

 300,667

 300,014

 297,818

 294,948

 291,928

 289,163

 285,203

 281,122

 276,241

 271,453

 268,221

 264,809

 261,389

 266,599

 273,867

 247,477

 252,297

 255,854

 254,007

 235,019

 216,616

 208,368

 206,320

 207,273

 210,476

 212,632

 213,989

 213,508

 214,196

 216,507

 219,529

 222,707

 225,618

 229,786

 234,082

 239,220

 244,260

 247,663

 251,253

 254,854

 249,369

 241,719

 240,580

 352,408

 368,252

 382,553

 388,834

 368,133

 347,018

 341,223

 345,214

 354,187

 367,154

 378,485

 388,518

 395,246

 404,145

 416,213

 429,837

 443,989

 457,824

 474,462

 491,665

 510,973

 530,434

 546,641

 563,511

 580,659

 577,040

 567,942

 573,831

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2010 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: March 1, 2010

 282,523

 277,703

 274,146

 275,993

 294,981

 313,384

 321,632

 323,680

 322,727

 319,524

 317,368

 316,011

 316,492

 315,804

 313,493

 310,471

 307,293

 304,382

 300,214

 295,918

 290,780

 285,740

 282,337

 278,747

 275,146

 280,631

 288,281

 289,420

 947,592

 931,748

 917,447

 911,166

 931,867

 952,982

 958,777

 954,786

 945,813

 932,846

 921,515

 911,482

 904,754

 895,855

 883,787

 870,163

 856,011

 842,176

 825,538

 808,335

 789,027

 769,566

 753,359

 736,489

 719,341

 722,960

 732,058

 726,169

 3,604,000

 3,620,000

 3,635,000

 3,641,000

 3,620,000

 3,599,000

 3,593,000

 3,597,000

 3,606,000

 3,619,000

 3,630,000

 3,641,000

 3,647,000

 3,656,000

 3,668,000

 3,682,000

 3,696,000

 3,710,000

 3,726,000

 3,744,000

 3,763,000

 3,782,000

 3,799,000

 3,816,000

 3,833,000

 3,829,000

 3,820,000

 3,826,000

 1.4240

 1.4596

 1.4952

 1.5308

 1.5664

 1.6020

 1.6376

 1.6732

 1.7088

 1.7444

 1.7800

 1.8156

 1.8512

 1.8868

 1.9224

 1.9580

 1.9936

 2.0292

 2.0648

 2.1004

 2.1360

 2.1716

 2.2072

 2.2428

 2.2784

 2.3140

 2.3496

 2.3852

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 285,110
#### § 641.884 What are the grant closeout procedures?

SCSEP recipients must follow the grant closeout procedures at 29 CFR 97.50 (State and local governments) or 29 CFR 95.71 (non-profit and government organizations), as appropriate. The Department will issue supplementary closeout instructions to OAA title V recipients as necessary.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.432 Submission of modified applications. ( a ) *Review of a modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.* Upon receipt of a response to a NOD, including any modifications, the CO will review the response. The CO may issue one or more additional NODs before issuing a decision. The employer's failure to comply with a NOD, including not responding in a timely manner or not providing all required documentation, will result in a denial of the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.*
( b ) *Acceptance of a modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.* If the CO accepts the modification(s) to the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* the CO will issue a NOA to the employer and, if applicable, the employer's attorney or agent.
( c ) *Denial of modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.* If the modified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* does not cure the deficiencies cited in the NOD(s) or otherwise fails to satisfy the criteria required for certification, the CO will, at its discretion, either send a second NOD or deny the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* in accordance with the labor certification determination provisions in § 655.453.
( d ) *Appeal from denial of modified CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.* The procedures for appealing a denial of a modified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* are the same as for appealing the denial of a nonmodified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* outlined in § 655.461.
( e ) *Post acceptance modifications.* Notwithstanding the decision to accept the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* the CO may require modifications to the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* at any time before the final determination to grant or deny the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* if the CO determines that the job offer does not contain the minimum benefits, wages, and working conditions set forth in § 655.441. The employer must make such modifications, or the application will be denied under § 655.453. The employer must provide all workers recruited in connection with the job opportunity in the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* with a copy of the modified *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* as approved by the CO, no later than the date work commences.
§ 677.225 Under what circumstances may local areas appeal a reorganization plan? ( a ) The Local WDB and chief elected official for a local area that is subject to a reorganization plan under WIOA sec. 116(g)(2)(A) may appeal to the Governor to rescind or revise the reorganization plan not later than 30 days after receiving notice of the reorganization plan. The Governor must make a final decision within 30 days after receipt of the appeal.
( b ) The Local WDB and chief elected official may appeal the final decision of the Governor to the Secretary of Labor not later than 30 days after receiving the decision from the Governor. Any appeal of the Governor's final decision must be: ( 1 ) Appealed jointly by the Local WDB and chief elected official to the Secretary of Labor under § 683.650 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) Must be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary of Labor, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the Governor.
( c ) Upon receipt of the joint appeal from the Local WDB and chief elected official, the Secretary of Labor must make a final decision within 30 days. In making this determination the Secretary of Labor may consider any comments submitted by the Governor in response to the appeals.
( d ) The decision by the Governor on the appeal becomes effective at the time it is issued and remains effective unless the Secretary of Labor rescinds or revises the reorganization plan under WIOA sec. 116(g)(2)(C).
#### Richie Roneel SINGH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-71319.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Jagdip Singh Sekhon, Esq., Scott A. Mossman, Sekhon *&*Sekhon, PLC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Greg D. Mack, Esq., Stacy S. Paddack, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Richie Roneel Singh, a native and citizen of Fiji, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence, *see Kaiser v. Ashcroft,*390 F.3d 653, 657 (9th Cir.2004), and we deny the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Singh concedes that he did not suffer past persecution and argues that he has a well-founded fear of persecution based on his membership in a disfavored group. Substantial evidence supports the IJ’s determination that Singh failed to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution in that Singh did not establish a sufficiently individualized risk. *See Sael v. Gonzales,*386 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir.2004). Further, Singh’s claimed fear of persecution is undermined by the continued presence of his father, brother and sister in Fiji. *See Hakeem v. INS,*273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001).

Pursuant to *Elian v. Ashcroft,*370 F.3d 897 (9th Cir.2004), Singh’s voluntary departure period will begin to run upon issuance of this court’s mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.