alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdditive Manufacturing of NiTiHf High Temperature Shape Memory AlloyAdditive manufacturing of a NiTi-20Hf high temperature shape memory alloy (HTSMA) was investigated. A selective laser melting (SLM) process by Phenix3D Systems was used to develop components from NiTiHf powder (of approximately 25-75 m particle fractions), and the thermomechanical response was compared to the conventionally vacuum induction skull melted counterpart. Transformation temperatures of the SLM material were found to be slightly lower due to the additional oxygen pick up from the gas atomization and melting process. The shape memory response in compression was measured for stresses up to 500 MPa, and transformation strains were found to be very comparable (Up to 1.26 for the as-extruded; up to 1.52 for SLM).Document ID20170006032Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBenafan, Othmane*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Bigelow, Glen S.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Elahinia, Mohammad*(Toledo Univ. OH, United States)*Moghaddam, Narges Shayesteh*(Toledo Univ. OH, United States)*Amerinatanzi, Amirhesam*(Toledo Univ. OH, United States)*Saedi, Soheil*(Kentucky Univ. Lexington, KY, United States)*Toker, Guher Pelin*(Kentucky Univ. Lexington, KY, United States)*Karaca, Haluk*(Kentucky Univ. Lexington, KY, United States)*Date AcquiredJuly 3, 2017Publication DateJune 1, 2017Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2017-219523GRC-E-DAA-TN43084E-19382Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC16VA75PWBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsNiTiHf; High Temperature Shape Memory Alloys; Additive Manufacturing; ActuatorsAvailable DownloadsNameType20170006032.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §7501. Definition

In this chapter, the term "Government of Afghanistan" includes—

(1) the government of any political subdivision of Afghanistan; and

(2) any agency or instrumentality of the Government of Afghanistan.

(Pub. L. 107–327, §1(c), Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2797.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title of 2004 Amendment

Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7104(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3780, provided that: "This section [enacting sections 7536a and 7555 of this title, amending sections 7513, 7514, 7518, 7536, 7537, 7538, and 7554 of this title, repealing section 2374 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 7511, 7513, 7514, and 7536 of this title] may be cited as the 'Afghanistan Freedom Support Act Amendments of 2004'."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 107–327, §1(a), Dec. 4, 2002, 116 Stat. 2797, provided that: "This Act [enacting this chapter] may be cited as the 'Afghanistan Freedom Support Act of 2002'."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2000 and the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,703
<INVENTORY>                                     90,182
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               348,442
<PP&E>                                          67,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                  43,225
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 465,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          209,142
<BONDS>                                         34,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                           490
<OTHER-SE>                                     205,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   465,105
<SALES>                                      1,773,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,970,685
<CGS>                                        1,642,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,772,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               192,719
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,712)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,567)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No.
      333-139309) on Form S-8 of Neuro-Hitech, Inc. of our report dated March 28,
      2007
      relating to our audit of consolidated financial statements which appear in
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 and our report
      dated September 22, 2006 relating to the financial statements of Q-RNA Inc.,
      which appear on Form 8-K of Neuro-Hitech Inc. dated November 29,
      2006.










MOORE
                STEPHENS, P.C.Certified
                Public Accountants




New
      York,
      New York


April
      13,
      2007
#### § 686.700 What are a Job Corps center's responsibilities in preparing students for career transition services?

Job Corps centers must assess and counsel students to determine their competencies, capabilities, and readiness for career transition services.
#### Gregory L. THOMAS, Appellant, v. GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, Appellee.

No. 03-7173.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Sept. 19, 2005.

Sharon Marie Weathers, Law Office of Sharon M. Weathers, Silver Spring, MD, for Appellant.

Henry Morris, Jr., Arent Fox Kintner Plotkin & Kahn, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and TATEL and BROWN, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

*590We reject the appellant’s challenge to the district court’s rulings excluding certain evidence. Because Thomas never challenged the rulings at trial by making an offer of proof, as required by Federal Rule of Evidence 103(a)(2), he forfeited his right to challenge them on appeal. *United, States v. Thompson,*279 F.3d 1043, 1047-48 (D.C.Cir.2002) (failure to alert the district court to the substance of excluded evidence “substantially hinder[s]” appellate review); *United States v. Lavelle,*751 F.2d 1266, 1272 (D.C.Cir.1985) (failure to make known the substance of excluded evidence bars consideration on appeal). With the record thus settled, we affirm the district court’s entry of judgment as a matter of law for the reasons stated by the district court.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1361.1 CA 13-00041**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ.

FIVE STAR BANK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARK LEWANDOWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

WESTERN NEW YORK LAW CENTER, BUFFALO (KEISHA A. WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (F. MICHAEL OSTRANDER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered April 13, 2012. The order denied the application of defendant Mark Lewandowski for a residential foreclosure settlement conference and directed that plaintiff may proceed with this foreclosure action.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant Mark Lewandowski appeals from an order that denied his application for a residential foreclosure settlement conference pursuant to CPLR 3408 and allowed plaintiff to proceed with this foreclosure action. It is undisputed, however, that the mortgage has now been foreclosed and the property has since been sold to a third-party buyer. Thus, as a result of the sale, this appeal has been rendered moot inasmuch as no purpose would be served by a settlement conference at this time ( see generally Homeowners Assn. of Victoria Woods, III v Incarnato , 4 AD3d 814, 815).

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Motor vehicle travel map. PikeNational Forest. Leadville Ranger District, Colorado**
 
2012 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:P 63/10/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:001037473
 
December 14, 2017
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors and Stockholders


Boise Cascade Company:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-186871) on Form S-8 of Boise Cascade Company of our report dated March 7, 2013, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Boise Cascade Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, which report appears in the December 31, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K of Boise Cascade Company.


/s/ KPMG


Boise, Idaho


March 7, 2013
§ 683.750 What procedure must be used for administering the offset/deduction provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act? ( a ) ( 1 ) For misexpenditures by direct recipients of title I and Wagner-Peyser Act formula funds the Grant Officer may determine that a debt, or a portion thereof, may be offset against amounts that are allotted to the recipient. Recipients must submit a written request for an offset to the Grant Officer. Generally, the Grant Officer will apply the offset against amounts that are available at the recipient level for administrative costs.
( 2 ) The Grant Officer may approve an offset request, under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if the misexpenditures were not due to willful disregard of the requirements of WIOA and regulations, fraud, gross negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of administration or a pattern of misexpenditure.
( b ) For subrecipient misexpenditures that were not due to willful disregard of the requirements of WIOA and regulations, fraud, gross negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of administration or a pattern of misexpenditure, if the Grant Officer has required the State to repay or offset such amount, the State may deduct an amount equal to the misexpenditure from the subrecipient's allocation of the program year after the determination was made. Deductions are to be made from funds reserved for the administrative costs of the local programs involved, as appropriate.
( c ) If offset is granted, the debt will not be fully satisfied until the Grant Officer reduces amounts allotted to the recipient by the amount of the misexpenditure.
( d ) For recipients of funds under title I and Wagner-Peyser Act funds, a direct recipient may not make a deduction under paragraph (b) of this section until the State has taken appropriate corrective action to ensure full compliance within the local area with regard to appropriate expenditure of WIOA funds.
# Table G1. SynopticSedSites

# Sheet2

# Sheet3
#### § 404.112 When we consider certain employees of private nonprofit organizations to be fully insured.

If you are age 55 or over on January 1, 1984, and are on that date an employee of an organization described in § 404.1025(a) which does not have in effect a waiver certificate under section 3121(k) of the Code on that date and whose employees are mandatorily covered as a result of section 102 of Pub. L. 98-21, we consider you to be fully insured if you meet the following requirements:

| Your age on January 1, 1984 is— | QC's acquired after Dec. 31, 1983 |
| --- | --- |
| 60 or over | 6 |
| 59 or over but less than age 60 | 8 |
| 58 or over but less than age 59 | 12 |
| 57 or over but less than age 58 | 16 |
| 55 or over but less than age 57 | 20 |

[50 FR 36573, Sept. 9, 1985]
#### Louis D. Krasner, Appellant, v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to modify to the extent of granting plaintiff’s motion under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
================================================================================





                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                             CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
                          TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



       Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): October 13, 2000


                                 OMI CORPORATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 THE MARSHALL ISLANDS                  001-14135                  52-2098714
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction     (Commission File Number        (I.R.S. Employer
    of incorporation)                                        Identification No.)



                                ONE STATION PLACE
                               STAMFORD, CT 06902
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Address and zip code of principal executive offices)

                                 (203) 602-6700
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

                                 NOT APPLICABLE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

================================================================================


<PAGE>


Item 5.       Other Events.

         On October 13, 2000, OMI Corporation  issued a press release announcing
that market  reports that it was seeking to raise equity in a private  placement
were correct but that it had ceased the effort.  The Company also confirmed that
its  previously  announced bank  refinancing  closed as scheduled on October 12,
2000.  The full text of the press  release is set forth in  Exhibit  99.1 and is
incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.       Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Statements and Exhibits.

         (c)      Exhibits

         99.1     Press release of OMI Corporation dated October 13, 2000.



<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


Dated: November 1, 2000


                                 OMI CORPORATION



                                 By:    /s/Craig Stevenson, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------
                                 Name:  Craig H. Stevenson, Jr.
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer and President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 20, 2020

No. 04-19-00832-CV

Maryvel SUDAY, Independent Executor to Petitioner, Olga Tamez de Suday,

Appellant

v.

Jesus Lozano SUDAY,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 3,625 CCL

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant has filed a motion to stay this appeal, which is DENIED. In the alternative, 

appellant requests an extension of time in which to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion for 

extension of time is GRANTED IN PART. Appellant’s deadline for filing appellant’s brief is 

extended by sixty (60) days. Appellant’s brief is due on or before April 21, 2020. Further 

requests for an extension of time in which to file appellant’s brief will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 20th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
§ 664.200 Who is eligible for youth services? An eligible youth is defined, under WIA sec. 101(13), as an individual who: ( a ) Is age 14 through 21;
( b ) Is a low income individual, as defined in the WIA section 101(25); and
( c ) Is within one or more of the following categories: ( 1 ) Deficient in basic literacy skills;
( 2 ) School dropout;
( 3 ) Homeless, runaway, or foster child;
( 4 ) Pregnant or parenting;
( 5 ) Offender; or
( 6 ) Is an individual (including a youth with a disability) who requires additional assistance to complete an educational program, or to secure and hold employment. (WIA sec. 101(13).)
§ 682.340 May other activities be undertaken as part of rapid response? ( a ) Yes, in order to conduct layoff aversion activities, or to prepare for and respond to dislocation events, in addition to the activities required under § 682.330, a State or designated entity may devise rapid response strategies or conduct activities that are intended to minimize the negative impacts of dislocation on workers, businesses, and communities and ensure rapid reemployment for workers affected by layoffs.
( b ) When circumstances allow, rapid response may provide guidance and/or financial assistance to establish community transition teams to assist the impacted community in organizing support for dislocated workers and in meeting the basic needs of their families, including heat, shelter, food, clothing and other necessities and services that are beyond the resources and ability of the one-stop delivery system to provide.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

August 21, 2020

Order 

Clerk

August 21, 2020

161679(63)

TRACY LYNN SULLIVAN, 

Plaintiff, 

SC: 161679 

v COA: 348606

Wayne CC: 18-104696-DM 

BRIAN ROBERT SULLIVAN, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

TRISH OLEKSA HAAS, 

Petitioner-Appellant.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellee to extend the time 

for filing his answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer will 

be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before August 31, 2020.
#### In the Matter of Belmont Paper Box Co., Inc., Judgment Creditor, Respondent, v. John Stephen, Judgment Debtor, Appellant.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier GONZALEZ-MANZANO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-51213.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

*660Donna F. Coltharp, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Javier Gonzalez-Manzano raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §906. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title V, §511, 60 Stat. 1007, related to appointment by President to a class in Foreign Service.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Appointment of Additional Foreign Service Officers; Termination Date

Act July 3, 1946, ch. 539, §§1–4, 60 Stat. 426, which provided for appointment of 250 additional Foreign Service officers within 2 years after July 3, 1946, was repealed by Pub. L. 89–554, §8(a), Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 653.