alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 495.39

 494.48

 493.60

 492.80

 491.62

 490.46

 489.45

 488.41

 487.22

 486.03

 484.73

 483.57

 482.49

 481.53

 480.61

 479.70

 478.80

 477.42

 476.29

 474.83

 473.39

 471.94

 470.75

 469.61

 468.39

 467.51

 466.60

 465.57

 464.65

 463.79

 462.95

 1,455,110

 1,444,807

 1,434,868

 1,425,852

 1,412,590

 1,399,592

 1,388,309

 1,376,722

 1,363,505

 1,350,330

 1,335,987

 1,323,231

 1,311,392

 1,300,899

 1,290,869

 1,280,973

 1,271,211

 1,256,291

 1,244,118

 1,228,438

 1,213,059

 1,197,636

 1,185,025

 1,172,985

 1,160,143

 1,150,909

 1,141,384

 1,130,635

 1,121,062

 1,112,136

 1,103,441

STORAGE

-9,191

-10,303

-9,939

-9,016

-13,262

-12,998

-11,283

-11,587

-13,217

-13,175

-14,343

-12,756

-11,839

-10,493

-10,030

-9,896

-9,762

-14,920

-12,173

-15,680

-15,379

-15,423

-12,611

-12,040

-12,842

-9,234

-9,525

-10,749

-9,573

-8,926

-8,695

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 4,351

 4,995

 4,984

 4,002

 6,604

 4,923

 5,480

 5,683

 6,500

 6,475

 7,068

 6,254

 5,714

 5,151

 4,740

 4,747

 4,760

 7,608

 5,949

 7,679

 7,608

 7,556

 6,186

 5,837

 6,436

 4,387

 4,884

 5,013

 4,642

 4,397

 4,050

POWER

 287

 303

 288

 273

 287

 284

 278

 291

 284

 275

 280

 288

 286

 302

 327

 321

 319

 292

 308

 286

 287

 292

 298

 292

 275

 290

 293

 311

 288

 297

 282

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+5

+104

+261

-271

+205

-1,346

+69

+133

+120

+107

+116

+111

+32

+163

+10

+78

+157

+378

+119

+60

+142

+73

+126

+58

+237

+22

+376

-95

+104

+194

-52

OR

 205

 183

 139

 142

 149

 152

 173

 126

 125

 161

 160

 146

 166

 188

 148

 201

 263

 262

 226

 236

 214

 189

 206

 120

 75

 54

 139

 78

 138

 141

 160

C.F.S.

 .56

 .50

 .38

 .39

 .41

 .42

 .48

 .35

 .35

 .45

 .45

 .41

 .47

 .53

 .42

 .57

 .75

 .75

 .65

 .68

 .62

 .55

 .60

 .35

 .22

 .16

 .41

 .23

 .41

 .42

 .48

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .03

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR August 8, 2008

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2008 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -360,860 0 174,663 9,064 0 +1,796 5,065 14.42 .10

ACRE-FEET -360,860 0 346,444 17,978 0 +3,562 10,046

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 346,444

PACHECO TUNNEL 17,978 TOTAL 364,422

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2007 TO DATE = 7.82

 1,464,301

SPILL 0 .10

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
#### The St. Louis National Stock Yards *v.*Himrod & Co.

*Practice—time to object to report of referee.*Where no objection is taken in the court below to the report of a referee in allowing interest upon an account stated, an objection to such allowance can not be heard in this court.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Clair county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

Mr. J. B. Bowman, and Mr. R. F. Wingate, for the appellant.

Mr. R. A. Halbert, and Mr. M. Millard, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was an action of assumpsit, in the St. Clair circuit court, brought by Himrod *&*Co. against appellant. The declaration contained the common counts. The general issue was pleaded. The parties then stipulated, in writing, to refer the case to Alonzo Wilderman, as referee, to take the testimony and report his conclusion to the court. There was a stipulation that judgment should be rendered upon the report. Upon the coming in of the report, defendants excepted to the report, and moved to set it aside. This motion was overruled, and judgment rendered for the amount reported due. Before judgment, a motion for a new trial was made and overruled, *411and exception taken. The report of the referee contained a full statement of all the evidence taken before him.

Upon the examination of the report of the referee, we find nothing in the report to which exception could reasonably be taken upon the proof, unless it be an item allowing interest upon an account stated by the referee as of the year of 1872. Before the circuit court, no objection was taken to the report on that ground. An objection upon that ground in such case can not be heard in this court. Otherwise the report seems to be fully sustained by the evidence.

We find no reason in the record for reversing the judgment, and it must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,040.71

 1,040.13

 1,039.57

 1,038.76

 1,038.09

 1,037.50

 1,036.95

 1,036.21

 1,035.57

 1,035.03

 1,034.42

 1,033.90

 1,033.29

 1,032.71

 1,031.80

 1,030.92

 1,030.33

 1,029.75

 1,029.19

 1,028.58

 1,027.98

 1,027.19

 1,026.37

 1,025.67

 1,025.07

 1,024.45

 1,023.81

 1,023.12

 1,022.61

 1,021.95

 1,021.42

 3,811.4

 3,796.0

 3,781.2

 3,759.8

 3,742.1

 3,726.6

 3,712.2

 3,692.9

 3,676.2

 3,662.2

 3,646.5

 3,633.0

 3,617.3

 3,602.5

 3,579.2

 3,556.8

 3,541.8

 3,527.2

 3,513.1

 3,497.7

 3,482.7

 3,463.0

 3,442.6

 3,425.2

 3,410.4

 3,395.1

 3,379.4

 3,362.5

 3,350.1

 3,334.0

 3,321.2

STORAGE

-13.8

-15.4

-14.8

-21.4

-17.7

-15.5

-14.4

-19.3

-16.6

-14.0

-15.8

-13.4

-15.7

-14.9

-23.3

-22.4

-15.0

-14.7

-14.1

-15.3

-15.1

-19.7

-20.4

-17.3

-14.8

-15.3

-15.7

-16.9

-12.4

-16.1

-12.8

CHANGE

 5,535

 4,687

 4,447

 1,641

 3,789

 5,335

 5,300

 3,336

 4,438

 5,459

 4,611

 5,974

 5,441

 4,773

 2,199

 1,822

 5,200

 5,254

 5,567

 5,100

 4,953

 3,521

 3,125

 4,388

 5,079

 5,113

 4,656

 5,788

 5,822

 4,801

 6,344

INFLOW

 12,217

 12,092

 11,707

 12,210

 12,507

 13,034

 12,377

 12,898

 12,588

 12,210

 12,228

 12,402

 13,162

 12,004

 13,635

 12,809

 12,492

 12,439

 12,405

 12,533

 12,240

 13,141

 13,099

 12,871

 12,229

 12,507

 12,276

 13,982

 11,816

 12,569

 12,603

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 273

 335

 218

 232

 185

 108

 192

 176

 244

 320

 334

 341

 189

 271

 292

 306

 246

 208

 281

 295

 302

 323

 307

 262

 327

 297

 303

 317

 273

 329

 214

C.F.S.

 .35

 .43

 .28

 .30

 .24

 .14

 .25

 .23

 .32

 .42

 .44

 .45

 .25

 .36

 .39

 .41

 .33

 .28

 .38

 .40

 .41

 .44

 .42

 .36

 .45

 .41

 .42

 .44

 .38

 .46

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2000 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 21, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -504.0 143,498 389,282 0 0 8,300 11.14 .01

ACRE-FEET -504,000 284,628 772,141 0 0 16,463

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 772,141

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 772,141

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .01

JULY 1, 2000 .01

 3,825.2

Table 3
#### § 669.140 How does the Division of Seasonal Farmworker Programs (DSFP) assist the MSFW grantee organizations to serve farmworker customers?

We provide technical assistance and training to MSFW grantees for the purposes of program implementation and program performance management leading to enhancement of services to and continuous improvement in the employment outcomes of farmworkers.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 74

 64

 64

 70

 71

 65

 66

 72

 72

 70

 65

 65

 72

 68

 65

 65

 75

 72

 79

 66

 72

 76

 66

 64

 82

 80

 77

 75

 73

 81

 85

 64

 63

 62

 63

 65

 63

 64

 63

 65

 64

 63

 63

 65

 63

 62

 64

 65

 64

 64

 65

 64

 66

 63

 63

 65

 73

 71

 71

 71

 72

 78

 69

 63

 63

 65

 67

 64

 65

 65

 67

 65

 64

 64

 68

 64

 63

 65

 68

 68

 70

 65

 66

 69

 64

 63

 71

 76

 73

 73

 72

 74

 81

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2012

HIGH LOW MEAN

 74.3

 59.0

 58.8

 59.8

 59.5

 60.0

 60.6

 60.8

 60.9

 60.8

 60.6

 60.9

 61.1

 60.9

 60.6

 61.6

 61.3

 61.1

 64.6

 61.9

 61.7

 61.8

 61.7

 61.0

 60.3

 59.9

 61.3

 62.8

 63.7

 64.3

 66.0

 58.8

 57.0

 56.9

 57.3

 57.2

 57.4

 57.7

 58.1

 58.0

 58.4

 58.2

 58.3

 58.9

 58.8

 58.2

 58.5

 59.0

 58.4

 59.4

 58.7

 59.1

 59.3

 59.3

 58.6

 58.6

 56.8

 58.2

 59.4

 60.1

 60.7

 61.8

 65.2

 58.1

 57.8

 58.5

 58.4

 58.6

 59.1

 59.5

 59.5

 59.6

 59.4

 59.6

 60.0

 59.8

 59.4

 59.9

 60.2

 59.8

 61.1

 60.3

 60.4

 60.5

 60.4

 59.8

 59.4

 58.4

 59.6

 61.0

 61.8

 62.5

 63.8

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.5

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.1

 9.0

 9.0

 8.9

 8.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.2

 9.1

 9.1

 7.9

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 8.6

 8.8

 9.1

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.6

 9.3

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.2

 9.3

 9.0

 9.3

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 8.9

 9.1

 9.2

 9.0

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund II and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      21,234,248
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  164,412<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,202,699<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,202,699<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (453,114)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,890,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,343,214)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,343,214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,343,214)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $89,611 and due
from DWR of $74,801.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized loss on open contracts of $(195,961).
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $259,985, accrued
management fees of $70,251 and accrued administrative expenses
of $57,300.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $55,384, net
change in unrealized of $(1,352,376) and interest income of $843,878.
</FN>



</TABLE>
### §5464. Economic and commercial officers at United States embassies and missions in Poland and Hungary

It is the sense of the Congress that, to the extent practicable—

(1) the United States Embassy in Budapest, Hungary, should be assigned one additional economic and commercial officer;

(2) the United States Embassy in Warsaw, Poland, should be assigned one additional economic officer and one additional commercial officer;

(3) the United States Trade Center in Warsaw, Poland, should be assigned one additional economic and commercial officer; and

(4) the United States mission in Krakow, Poland, should be assigned one additional economic and commercial officer.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title VI, §604, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1320.)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 12, 2020

Order 

Clerk

February 12, 2020

160576(144)

MARY ANN LAMKIN and STEVE LAMKIN,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 160576

v COA: 326986

Livingston CC: 12-026600-NZ

EUGENE HARTMEIER, CYNTHIA 

HARTMEIER, KEVIN HARTMEIER, DENNIS 

MCCOMB, GLORIA MCCOMB, DANIEL 

ENGRAM, DANIELLE ENGRAM, JAMES 

BEAUDOIN, CECILE LAUDENSLAGER, 

ANGELA CHRISTIE, KIMBERLY KRASKA, 

JOAN BEAUDOIN, AARON KIRBY, DAMON 

HARTMEIER, DENISE ENGRAM, DEANN 

ENGRAM, DEREK ENGRAM, CATHERINE 

BARRETT,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

RONALD THYBAULT and the Estate of MARY 

WECKESER, 

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendants-appellees Engram and 

Kraska to extend the time for filing their answer to the application for leave to appeal is 

GRANTED. The answer submitted on February 7, 2020, is accepted as timely filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         102,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,894,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,084,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,443,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,132,000
<PP&E>                                       8,229,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,749,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,048,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,754,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,177,000
<COMMON>                                       167,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,592,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                38,048,000
<SALES>                                     18,117,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,117,000
<CGS>                                       12,789,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,135,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               674,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             479,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                308,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            288,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   288,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
#### City of New Rochelle, Respondent, v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Appellant.

Action to recover on an undertaking given by the defendant in connection with obtaining a stay of' execution of a judgment of foreclosure and sale of certain real property. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 247

 235

 257

 263

 241

 252

 281

 319

 358

 338

 304

 323

 320

 319

 322

 306

 325

 402

 444

 554

 586

 657

 581

 468

 430

 443

 400

 444

 408

 486

 172

 174

 180

 182

 179

 186

 192

 193

 193

 197

 202

 206

 198

 202

 198

 199

 200

 197

 201

 197

 201

 194

 174

 180

 178

 170

 184

 187

 171

 173

 202

 197

 206

 210

 200

 202

 215

 227

 237

 237

 236

 240

 238

 245

 244

 240

 240

 251

 272

 311

 376

 345

 299

 274

 263

 271

 280

 278

 270

 283

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 6, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.2140 Liability for erroneous Medicaid eligibility determinations.

If the State suffers any financial loss, directly or indirectly, through using any information we provide under an agreement described in this subpart, we will not be responsible for that loss. However, if we erroneously tell a State that a person is eligible for Medicaid and the State therefore makes erroneous Medicaid payments, the State will be paid the Federal share of those payments under the Medicaid program as if they were correct.
#### § 498.224 Harmless error.

No error in either the admission or the exclusion of evidence, and no error or defect in any ruling or order or in any act done or omitted by the ALJ or by any of the parties is ground for vacating, modifying or otherwise disturbing an otherwise appropriate ruling or order or act, unless refusal to take such action appears to the ALJ or the DAB to be inconsistent with substantial justice. The ALJ and the DAB at every stage of the proceeding will disregard any error or defect in the proceeding that does not affect the substantial rights of the parties.

[61 FR 65472, Dec. 13, 1996]
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J.
Schlanger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WebMD Health Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. [Intentionally omitted]*

4. [Intentionally omitted]*

5. [Intentionally omitted]*

Date: April 29, 2016



/s/ David J. SchlangerDavid J. SchlangerChief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)




|* | Paragraphs 3 through 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by WebMD Health Corp. on February 29, 2016.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Redpoint Bio Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-146295 on Form S-8 of Redpoint Bio Corporation of our report
dated March 26, 2009, with respect to the balance sheets of Redpoint Bio Corporation as of December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, redeemable convertible
preferred stock and stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and for the period from August 16,
1995 (inception) to December 31, 2008 which report appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Redpoint Bio Corporation.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
March 26, 2009

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 11


                              QuesTech, Inc.

               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (UNAUDITED)


                                                Three Months Ended March 31
                                                     1997          1996

<S>                                               <C>          <C>
Net earnings .................................    $  121,600   $  110,700

Primary earnings:

  Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding ..............     1,612,993    1,536,461
    Common stock equivalents .................        70,985      158,387
    SECT shares, weighted ....................      <176,131>    <178,141>

    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding as adjusted ..     1,507,847    1,516,707

Primary earnings per share ...................          $.08         $.07 

Fully Diluted earnings:

  Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding ..............     1,612,993    1,536,461
    Common stock equivalents .................        72,748      158,188
    SECT shares, weighted ....................      <176,131>    <178,141>

    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding as adjusted ..     1,509,610    1,516,508

Fully diluted earnings per share .............          $.08         $.07 
</TABLE>
(No. 73—CC—303

#### Frank Cankar, Sr., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 15, 1973.*

Frank Cankar, Sr., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### Paul Dickey, Appellant, v. Christopher A. Gortner, Respondent.

Motion denied, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas and Rich, JJ.; Carr, J., taking no part.