alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549



                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
                       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



                                 April 2, 2003
                Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)

                        ASSOCIATED MATERIALS INCORPORATED
             (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

                                                                75-1872487
          Delaware                     000-24956               (IRS Employer
(State or Other Jurisdiction    (Commission File Number)     Identification No.)
       of Incorporation)
                                 3773 State Road
                           Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223
                    (Address of Principal Executive Offices)

                                 (330) 929-1811
              (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

<PAGE>
Item 8.   CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR

          By unanimous written consent dated April 2, 2003, the Board of
Directors of Associated Materials Incorporated (the "Company") has changed the
Company's fiscal year from a calendar year to a 52/53 week retail fiscal year
ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. This change will be effective for
fiscal year 2003, which will end on January 3, 2004. The Company's first fiscal
quarter in 2003 will end on March 28, 2003; thereafter each quarter will consist
of a 13-week period ending on a Saturday. In fiscal years consisting of 53
weeks, the final quarter will consist of 14 weeks. There will be no transition
period for such change in fiscal year end.

<PAGE>
                                    SIGNATURE

          Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                        ASSOCIATED MATERIALS INCORPORATED


DATE:  April 2, 2003                   By:   /s/ D. Keith LaVanway
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           D. Keith LaVanway
                                           Vice President, Chief Financial
                                           Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

                                      -3-
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4499 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove consideration 

of certain pain-related issues from calculations under the Medicare hospital value-based purchasing program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 9, 2016 

Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia (for himself, Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky, Ms. 

KUSTER, Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. GUINTA, and Mr. 

LYNCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to remove 

consideration of certain pain-related issues from calculations under the Medicare hospital value-based purchasing 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Responsible 

5 Opioid Prescribing Act of 2016’’ and as the ‘‘PROP Act 

6 of 2016’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4499 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVING CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PAIN-RE2 LATED ISSUES FROM CALCULATIONS UNDER 

3 THE MEDICARE HOSPITAL VALUE-BASED 

4 PURCHASING PROGRAM. 

5 Section 1886(o)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1395ww(o)(2)(B)) is amended— 

7 (1) in clause (i)(II), by inserting ‘‘, subject to 

8 clause (iii),’’ after ‘‘shall’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

10 clause: 

11 ‘‘(iii) EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN PAIN12 RELATED MEASURES.—For value-based in13 centive payments made with respect to dis14 charges occurring during fiscal year 2016 

15 or a subsequent fiscal year, the Secretary 

16 shall ensure that measures selected under 

17 subparagraph (A) do not include measures 

18 based on any assessments by patients, with 

19 respect to hospital stays of such patients, 

20 of— 

21 ‘‘(I) the need of such patients, 

22 during such stay, for medicine for 

23 pain; 

24 ‘‘(II) how often, during such 

25 stay, the pain of such patients was 

26 well controlled; or 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4499 IH

1 ‘‘(III) how often, during such 

2 stay, the staff of the hospital in which 

3 such stay occurred did everything they 

4 could to help the patient with the pain 

5 experienced by the patient.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 677.240 What are the requirements for data validation of State annual performance reports? ( a ) States must establish procedures, consistent with guidelines issued by the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, to ensure that they submit complete annual performance reports that contain information that is valid and reliable, as required by WIOA sec. 116(d)(5).
( b ) If a State fails to meet standards in paragraph (a) of this section as determined by the Secretary of Labor or the Secretary of Education, the appropriate Secretary will provide technical assistance and may require the State to develop and implement corrective actions, which may require the State to provide training for its subrecipients.
( c ) The Secretaries of Labor and Education will provide training and technical assistance to States in order to implement this section. States must comply with the requirements of sec. 116(d)(5) of WIOA as explained in guidance.
### §276c–4. Employment of United States citizens by certain international organizations

Not later than 180 days after December 16, 2016, and annually thereafter for 3 years, the Secretary of State shall submit to Congress a report that provides—

(1) for each international organization that had a geographic distribution formula in effect on January 1, 1991, an assessment of whether that organization—

(A) is taking good faith steps to increase the staffing of United States citizens, including, as appropriate, as assessment of any additional steps the organization could be taking to increase such staffing; and

(B) has met the requirements of its geographic distribution formula; and

(2) an assessment of United States representation among professional and senior-level positions at the United Nations, including—

(A) an assessment of the proportion of United States citizens employed at the United Nations Secretariat and at all United Nations specialized agencies, funds, and programs relative to the total employment at the United Nations Secretariat and at all such agencies, funds, and programs;

(B) an assessment of compliance by the United Nations Secretariat and such agencies, funds, and programs with any applicable geographic distribution formula; and

(C) a description of any steps taken or planned to be taken by the United States to increase the staffing of United States citizens at the United Nations Secretariat and such agencies, funds and programs.

(Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §181, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 682; Pub. L. 114–323, title III, §308, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1923.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2016—Pub. L. 114–323 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Not less than 180 days after October 28, 1991, and each year thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit a report to the Congress concerning each international organization which had a geographic distribution formula in effect on January 1, 1991, of whether each such organization—

"(1) is taking good faith steps to increase the staffing of United States citizens; and

"(2) has met its geographic distribution formula."
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 24


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                       DIRECTORS OF CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.


         Know all men by these presents that each person whose name is signed
below has made, constituted and appointed, and by this instrument does make,
constitute and appoint John S. Szuch his true and lawful attorney with full
power of substitution and resubstitution to affix for him and in his name, place
and stead, as attorney-in-fact, his signature as director or officer, or both,
of Capital Holdings, Inc., an Ohio corporation (the "Company"), to a
Registration Statement on Form S-8 registering under the Securities Act of 1933,
common stock to be sold under the Capital Holdings, Inc. Amended and Restated
Director and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and to any and all amendments,
post-effective amendments and exhibits to that Registration Statement, and to
any and all applications and other documents pertaining thereto, giving and
granting to such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform
every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done in the premises, as fully as
he might or could do if personally present, and hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorney-in-fact or any such substitute shall lawfully do or cause
to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed at Sylvania,
Ohio, this 9th day of November, 1999.

/s/ James M. Appold
------------------------------      Director
James M. Appold

/s/ David P. Bennett
------------------------------      Director
David P. Bennett

/s/ Yale M. Feniger
------------------------------      Director
Yale M. Feniger

/s/ George A. Isaac, III
------------------------------      Director
George A. Isaac, III

/s/ Harley J. Kripke
------------------------------      Director
Harley J. Kripke

/s/ Michael C. Landin
------------------------------      Director
Michael C. Landin

/s/ Ronald R. Langenderfer
------------------------------      Director
Ronald R. Langenderfer

------------------------------      Director
Joel A. Levine

/s/ W. G. Lyden, III
------------------------------      Director
W. G. Lyden, III

/s/ Thomas W. Noe
------------------------------      Director
Thomas W. Noe

/s/ Noel S. Romanoff
------------------------------      Director
Noel S. Romanoff

/s/ Scott J. Savage
------------------------------      Director
Scott J. Savage

/s/ James D. Sayre
------------------------------      Director
James D. Sayre
### SUBCHAPTER I—WAR MATERIALS
§ 609.10 Restrictions on entitlement. ( a ) *Disqualification.* If the week of unemployment for which an individual claims UCFE is a week to which a disqualification for State unemployment compensation applies under the applicable State law, or would apply but for the fact that the individual has no right to such compensation, the individual shall not be entitled to a payment of UCFE for that week.
( b ) *Allocation of terminal annual leave payments.* Lump-sum terminal annual leave payments shall not be allocated by a Federal agency and shall be allocated by a State agency in the same manner as similar payments to individuals employed by private employers are allocated under the applicable State law. In a State in which a private employer has an option as to the period to which such payments shall be allocated, such payments shall be allocated to the date of separation from employment.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Herman Weed, Respondent, against Pekin Stone Products Co. et al., Appellants, and Special Disability Fund, Respondent, Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur. [See 272 App. Div. 1082.]
§ 681.640 Are incentive payments to youth participants permitted? Yes, incentive payments to youth participants are permitted for recognition and achievement directly tied to training activities and work experiences. The local program must have written policies and procedures in place governing the award of incentives and must ensure that such incentive payments are: ( a ) Tied to the goals of the specific program;
( b ) Outlined in writing before the commencement of the program that may provide incentive payments;
( c ) Align with the local program's organizational policies; and
( d ) Are in accordance with the requirements contained in 2 CFR part 200.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 730.60

 730.80

 730.99

 731.17

 731.37

 728.11

 725.70

 725.91

 726.09

 726.29

 726.44

 726.58

 726.73

 726.89

 727.06

 727.26

 727.44

 727.58

 727.72

 727.85

 727.98

 728.18

 728.49

 728.62

 729.07

 729.43

 729.63

 729.78

 729.89

 730.04

 730.20

 1,601

 1,610

 1,618

 1,625

 1,634

 1,498

 1,400

 1,408

 1,416

 1,424

 1,430

 1,435

 1,441

 1,448

 1,454

 1,463

 1,470

 1,476

 1,482

 1,487

 1,492

 1,500

 1,513

 1,518

 1,537

 1,552

 1,560

 1,567

 1,571

 1,578

 1,584

STORAGE

+8

+9

+8

+7

+9

-136

-98

+8

+8

+8

+6

+5

+6

+7

+6

+9

+7

+6

+6

+5

+5

+8

+13

+5

+19

+15

+8

+7

+4

+7

+6

CHANGE

4

5

4

4

5

-8

-7

4

4

4

3

3

3

4

3

5

4

3

3

3

3

4

7

3

10

8

4

4

2

4

3

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 61

 42

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2018 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2018

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -9 105 0 103

ACRE-FEET -9 208 0 204

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 204

 204

 1,593

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4411 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4411

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12737, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to three consecutive 2-year periods 
from the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by 
the Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may reinstate the license for the project effective as of 
the date of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 
subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4411

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.
```
J. 

J. 

MEM 'i-42111151OMMki 

judgment of conviction or sentence. NRS 34.320; NRS 34.330; NRS 

34.724(2)(b). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

Gibbons 

J. 

Douglas 

Saitta 

cc: Hon. Steven P. Elliott, District Judge 

Ferri11 Joseph Volpicelli 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PHILLIP FRIAS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00325

- C R

Appeal from the

171 st District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20130D03266 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’s third motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until July 2 , 201 7

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Robin Norris

, Appellant’ s attorney, prepare the

Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 2 , 201 7

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 th day of June , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3615

_____________________________

CHRISTOPHER D. POWELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

April 9, 2019

LONG, JR., ROBERT E., ASSOCIATE JUDGE.

Christopher Powell appeals his convictions for the firstdegree murder of one woman and the attempted first-degree 

murder of another woman, both committed on February 20, 2016. 

Because the evidentiary errors he asserts on appeal were 

unpreserved at trial, reversal is available only if Powell shows 

that the errors were fundamental. Williams v. State, 209 So. 3d 

543, 557 (Fla. 2017). 

Powell contends that the trial court committed fundamental 

error by allowing testimony from a co-defendant regarding the 

events leading up to the charged incidents – that a BOLO (be on 

lookout) had been issued for Powell, a warrant had been issued 

for Powell’s arrest, and that Powell “beat [his wife] up.” 
2

However, our review of the trial transcript reveals that the 

co-defendant’s comments were isolated, passing references to 

explain some of Powell’s actions being related by the witness.

The State never mentioned these portions of the co-defendant’s 

testimony in any argument, and, taken in context of the entire 

trial, these references did not become a feature of the trial. The

admission of these statements was not fundamental error. See 

Calloway v. State, 210 So. 3d 1160, 1191 (Fla. 2017) (unpreserved 

error “so fundamental as to require reversal ‘must reach down 

into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of 

guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the 

alleged error.’”). 

Powell also argues that the trial court fundamentally erred 

by allowing two sheriff’s deputies to testify regarding out of court 

statements made by the surviving victim during the investigation 

of the case. The surviving victim testified at trial prior to the

testimony of these officers. The record shows that even if 

contemporaneous objections had been raised, the testimony of 

these officers did not improperly bolster the witness’ credibility in 

a simple swearing match between witnesses. The surviving 

victim was not the only witness to Appellant’s acts and the record 

of the entire trial demonstrates overwhelming evidence to 

support the jury’s verdict. Any error in admitting hearsay 

evidence from these witnesses was harmless and, in the context 

of the entire trial, certainly not fundamental error. See Floyd v. 

State, 850 So. 2d 383, 400 (Fla. 2002). 

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and JAY, J., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
3

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Anne C. Conley, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>          JUN-30-1998

<CASH>                      27,265,218 
<SECURITIES>                      0    
<RECEIVABLES>                  568,391 
<ALLOWANCES>                      0    
<INVENTORY>                       0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>            27,833,609 
<PP&E>                      34,025,945 
<DEPRECIATION>                    0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>              67,560,589 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        3,516,665 
<BONDS>                     53,447,914 
<COMMON>                          0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0    
<PREFERRED>                       0    
<OTHER-SE>                  (3,338,388)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>67,560,589 
<SALES>                      4,493,410 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             5,250,254 
<CGS>                             0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                2,210,903 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               659,100 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           2,936,588 
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (556,337)
<INCOME-TAX>                      0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (238,574)
<DISCONTINUED>               2,633,169 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0    
<CHANGES>                         0    
<NET-INCOME>                 2,394,595 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     5.93 
<EPS-DILUTED>                     5.93 

        

</TABLE>