alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STORAGE - A.F. CHANGE SHASTA NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV

IRON

CANYON PIT 6 PIT 7

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S

RIVER 

C.F.S

NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 33,994 15,924 11,890 8,460 30,921 101,189 -629 -317 3,367 3,050 398.4

2 34,176 12,645 15,924 8,208 30,246 101,199 10 5 3,867 3,872 406.1

3 33,922 16,040 13,300 8,264 31,824 103,350 2,151 1,084 2,897 3,981 414.0

4 34,569 16,175 12,869 8,468 29,291 101,372 -1,978 -997 4,614 3,617 421.2

5 34,116 16,188 12,631 8,367 31,005 102,307 935 471 2,765 3,236 427.6

6 34,165 16,165 12,057 7,929 31,519 101,835 -472 -238 4,367 4,129 435.8

7 33,883 12,058 16,127 8,357 31,082 101,507 -328 -165 4,531 4,366 444.5

8 34,452 12,137 16,105 8,417 32,275 103,386 1,879 947 2,870 3,817 452.0

9 33,671 11,966 16,065 8,569 33,627 103,898 512 258 3,257 0 452.0

10 33,978 16,049 12,815 8,194 33,392 104,428 530 267 3,043 3,310 458.6

11 34,073 16,104 12,568 8,179 32,866 103,790 -638 -322 3,635 3,313 465.2

12 34,187 16,078 12,603 8,135 32,281 103,284 -506 -255 3,363 3,108 471.3

13 33,907 16,088 12,438 8,553 32,174 103,160 -124 -63 3,547 3,484 478.3

14 33,811 16,085 12,298 8,631 31,084 101,909 -1,251 -631 3,960 3,329 484.9

15 34,425 16,062 12,248 8,574 29,960 101,269 -640 -323 3,495 3,172 491.1

16 34,341 16,146 12,554 8,398 32,179 103,618 2,349 1,184 2,218 3,402 497.9

17 34,201 16,244 11,989 8,739 33,536 104,709 1,091 550 2,166 2,716 503.3

18 34,140 16,312 11,444 8,650 32,713 103,259 -1,450 -731 7,821 7,090 517.3

19 34,094 16,782 11,757 8,636 33,606 104,875 1,616 815 12,407 13,222 543.6

20 34,104 17,167 10,904 8,405 33,389 103,969 -906 -457 9,999 9,542 562.5

21 34,216 17,091 9,848 8,748 32,656 102,559 -1,410 -711 6,675 5,964 574.3

22 34,307 16,740 8,125 8,793 31,738 99,703 -2,856 -1,440 6,168 4,728 583.7

23 34,097 16,316 9,104 8,384 27,676 95,577 -4,126 -2,080 6,536 4,456 592.5

24 33,983 16,043 9,851 8,517 30,248 98,642 3,065 1,545 2,713 4,258 601.0

25 34,108 15,842 10,359 8,273 32,424 101,006 2,364 1,192 2,834 4,026 609.0

26 34,189 15,736 10,377 8,732 31,714 100,748 -258 -130 3,875 3,745 616.4

27 34,336 15,680 10,980 8,302 32,317 101,615 867 437 4,765 5,202 626.7

28 34,462 15,696 10,541 8,515 33,532 102,746 1,131 570 4,996 5,566 637.8

29 34,393 15,857 10,081 8,765 30,855 99,951 -2,795 -1,409 12,125 10,716 659.0

30 34,233 16,072 10,332 8,443 31,901 100,981 1,030 519 13,357 13,876 686.5

31 34,301 16,159 9,945 8,813 31,777 100,995 14 7 9,179 9,186 704.8

Totals -823 157,479

Acre - Feet 312,360

* October 1, 2023 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At Shasta Dam

Run Date: 1/10/2024

December 2023
#### Richard A. Challenger et al., Appellants, v. Household Finance *845Corporation, Respondent.

No opinion. Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ. [179 Misc. 966.]
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
      of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino
      Gas
      International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
       The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
      December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
        Dec. 7, 2007





/s/
      Liu
      Yu Chuan





Liu
      Yu
      Chuan


Chief
      Executive Officer








/s/
      Vincent Hu





Vincent
      Hu


Chief
      Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### §3353. International military education and training cooperation with Taiwan

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense shall establish or expand a comprehensive training program with Taiwan designed to—

(1) enhance interoperability and capabilities for joint operations between the United States and Taiwan;

(2) enhance rapport and deepen partnership between the militaries of the United States and Taiwan, and foster understanding of the United States among individuals in Taiwan;

(3) improve Taiwan's defense capabilities; and

(4) train future leaders of Taiwan, promote professional military education, civilian control of the military, and protection of human rights.

#### (b) Elements

The training program required by subsection (a) should prioritize relevant and realistic training, including as necessary joint United States-Taiwan contingency tabletop exercises, war games, full-scale military exercises, and an enduring rotational United States military presence that assists Taiwan in maintaining force readiness and utilizing United States defense articles and services transferred from the United States to Taiwan.

#### (c) Authorization of participation of Taiwan in the International Military Education and Training program

The Secretary of State is authorized to provide training and education to relevant entities in Taiwan through the International Military Education and Training program authorized under chapter 5 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2347 et seq).1

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LV, §5504, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3298.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsec. (c), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Chapter 5 of part II of the Act is classified generally to part V (§2347 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 32 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

1 So in original. Probably should be "seq.)."
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1171 When the alternative rules apply. ( a ) *Eligibility for the alternative.* We use the alternative income counting rules for you if you meet all the following conditions: ( 1 ) You were eligible for, and received, assistance for December 1973 under a State plan for October 1972;
( 2 ) You have continued to live in that same State since December 1973;
( 3 ) You were transferred to the SSI rolls and received a benefit for January 1974; and
( 4 ) You have not been ineligible for an SSI benefit for any period of more than 6 consecutive months. (For purposes of this section, an SSI benefit means a Federal benefit; it does not include any State supplementation.)
( b ) *Living in the same State.* For purposes of this section, you have continued to live in the same State since December 1973 unless you have left it at any time with the intention of moving to another State. If there is no evidence to the contrary, we assume that— ( 1 ) If you leave the State for 90 calendar days or less, the absence is temporary and you still live in that State; and
( 2 ) If you leave the State for more than 90 calendar days, you are no longer living there.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

TERRY LIPINSKI,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 224 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of December, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 99.2
                                                                       Exhibit 1

[GMAC Mortgage LOGO]

                  Management's Assertion Concerning Compliance
                      with USAP Minimum Servicing Standards

March 21, 2006


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, GMAC Mortgage Corporation and
its subsidiaries (the "Company") have complied in all material respects with the
minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers ("USAP").

As of and for this same period, the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and
errors and omissions policy in the amounts of $350,000,000 and $100,000,000
respectively.


/s/ Jim Hillsman
-------------------------------------
Jim Hillsman
Chief Operating Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Dave Bricker
-------------------------------------
Dave Bricker
Chief Financial Officer
GMAC Residential Holding Corp


/s/ Tony Renzi
-------------------------------------
Executive Vice President,
National Servicing Administration
GMAC Residential Holding Corp
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Affinia Group Intermediate Holdings Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Terry R. McCormack, as
Chief Executive Officer and Thomas H. Madden, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Terry R. McCormack                           
|Terry R. McCormack                               
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director 
|(Principal Executive Officer)                    
|                                                 
|March 11, 2011                                   
|                                                 
|/s/ Thomas H. Madden                             
|Thomas H. Madden                                 
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                    
|                                                 
|March 11, 2011
#### § 625.17 Announcement of the beginning of a Disaster Assistance Period.

Whenever a major disaster is declared in a State, the State agency shall promptly announce throughout the major disaster area by all appropriate news media that individuals who are unemployed as the result of the major disaster may be entitled to DUA; that they should file initial applications for DUA as soon as possible, but not later than the 30th day after the announcement date; the beginning date of the Disaster Assistance Period; and where individuals may obtain further information and file applications for DUA.
(No. 73-CC-180

#### American Petroleum Institute, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June*28, *1973.*

American Petroleum Institute, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. *391Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.625 Written notice, service and Federal Register publication of Administrator's determination. ( a ) The Administrator's determination, issued pursuant to § 655.605 of this part, shall be served on the complainant, the employer, and other known interested parties by personal service or by certified mail at the parties' last known addresses. Where service by certified mail is not accepted by the party, the Administrator may exercise discretion to serve the determination by regular mail.
( b ) Where the Administrator determines the prevailing practice regarding the use of alien crewmember(s) to perform longshore activity(ies) in a U.S. port (whether the Administrator's investigation involves an employer operating under an attestation, or under the automated vessel exception), the Administrator shall, simultaneously with issuance of the determination, publish in the Federal Register a notice of the determination. The notice shall identify the activity(ies), the U.S. port, and the prevailing practice regarding the use of alien crewmembers. The notice shall also inform interested parties that they may request a hearing pursuant to § 655.630 of this part, within 15 days of the date of the determination.
( c ) The Administrator shall file with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor, a copy of the complaint and the Administrator's determination.
( d ) The Administrator's written determination required by § 655.605 of this part shall: ( 1 ) Set forth the determination of the Administrator and the reason or reasons therefor, and in the case of a finding of violation(s) by an attesting employer, prescribe any remedies, including the amount of any civil money penalties assessed and the reason therefor, and/or any other remedies required for compliance with the employer's attestation.
( 2 ) Inform the interested parties that they may request a hearing pursuant to § 655.625 of this part.
( 3 ) Inform the interested parties that in the absence of a timely request for a hearing, received by the Chief Administrative Law Judge within 15 calendar days of the date of the determination, the determination of the Administrator shall become final and not appealable.
( 4 ) Set forth the procedure for requesting a hearing, and give the address of the Chief Administrative Law Judge (with whom the request must be filed) and the representative(s) of the Solicitor of Labor (upon whom copies of the request must be served).
( 5 ) Inform the parties that, pursuant to § 655.665, the Administrator shall notify ETA and the DHS of the occurrence of a violation by the attesting employer or of the non-attesting employer's ineligibility for the automated vessel exception.
#### LOCKMON, Respondent, v. EVANS, et al, Appellants.

(238 N. W. 341.)

(File No. 7029.

Opinion filed October 19, 1931.)

*P. F. Ward*and *W. P. Rooney,*both of Hot Springs, for Appellants.

*Chas. S. Easpman,*of Flot Springs, for Respondent.

CAMPBELL, J.

Plaintiff instituted his action in the court below seeking to recover of the defendants the sum of $210 as damages resulting from trespass of live stock. The matter duly came on for trial before a jury who returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on all the issues, and assessed his damages at $100. Thereafter defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, which motion was denied, and judgment was entered upon the verdict in favor of plaintiff, and defendants have now sought to appeal.

*129The brief of appellants manifests an entire disregard of the rules of this court. The defects therein were specifically brought to the attention of appellants and challeng'ed in respondent’s brief which was filed some months past. Appellants have made no effort whatever to improve their situation by correcting or amending their brief or supplying the deficiencies therein. It may well be doubted whether there is anything whatever before this court. We rest our decision, however, upon the following proposition. The sole object of the attempted appeal is to review in this court the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict of the jury. Nowhere in appellants’ brief is it made affirmatively to appear (as required by rule 4 of this court and section 3149, Rev. Code 1919) that the brief contains a statement of all the material evidence received upon the trial. According to the uniform course of our decisions, it follows that the sufficiency of the evidence is not reviewable. Denton v. Butler, 37 S. D. 444, 158 N. W. 1017; Felix v. Apartment Homes Co., 46 S. D. 4, 190 N. W. 78; Hilton v. Cramer, 50 S. D. 274, 209 N. W. 543; Hanson v. Lambert, 53 S. D. 34, 219 N. W. 892.

Appellants having failed to preserve and present to this court, in the manner required by law and the rules of this court, any claim of error, the judgment and order attempted to be appealed from are affirmed.

POLLEY, P. J., and ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 10,243

 10,731

 9,944

 9,370

 8,464

 6,350

 5,241

 5,339

 5,983

 6,900

 8,639

 10,330

 10,957

 12,664

 13,902

 14,083

 13,492

 11,563

 10,643

 8,023

 7,223

 6,666

 8,089

 8,677

 10,065

 11,337

 11,634

 12,111

 12,426

 11,933

 1,499

 1,583

 1,450

 1,225

 1,372

 1,130

 927

 803

 1,041

 1,313

 1,399

 1,255

 1,342

 1,602

 1,897

 2,121

 1,847

 2,170

 2,466

 1,622

 1,467

 1,698

 2,041

 2,231

 1,780

 1,810

 2,026

 1,869

 1,893

 1,566

 4,890

 4,826

 4,552

 4,128

 4,004

 3,487

 2,732

 2,684

 2,737

 2,898

 3,464

 3,953

 4,515

 5,521

 6,626

 6,934

 6,120

 5,753

 6,136

 4,773

 4,066

 3,866

 3,989

 4,239

 4,363

 5,262

 5,666

 5,768

 5,791

 5,461

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

November 2004

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,035 2-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,203 3-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,042 4-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,728 5-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,427 6-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,113 7-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,764 8-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,124 9-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,109 

10-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,910 11-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,548 12-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,458 13-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,465 14-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,473 15-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,788 16-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,732 17-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,684 

18-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,519 19-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,368 20-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,913 21-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,607 22-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,913 23-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,439 24-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,359 25-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,240 26-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,507 27-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,530 28-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 1,513 29-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,594 30-Nov-04 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,676 

Total 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 114,779 1

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. No tagged Winter Run Length Fish were observed in November.

Banks T
(No. 3025

#### Elva Jennings Penwell, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 22, 1974.*

Gosnell, Benecki and Quindry, Attorneys for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Claimant filed her Petition for reimbursement for moneys expended for nursing care and help, medical services, and expenses from January 1, 1972, to December 31, 1972, praying for an award in the sum of $9,078.58.

Claimant was seriously injured in an accident on the second day of February, 1936, while employed as a Su*210pervisor at the Illinois Soldier’s and Sailor’s Children’s School at Normal, Illinois. The complete details of this injury can be found in the original cause of action, *Penwell*vs. *State of Illinois,*11 C.C.R. 365, in which an initial award was made, and at which time jurisdiction was retained to make successive awards in the future, and this Court has periodically made supplemental awards to Claimant to cover expenses incurred by her, the last award covering the time period from January 1, 1971 to December 31, 1971.

A joint motion of Claimant and Respondent was filed herein requesting leave to waive the filing of briefs and arguments. In addition, Claimant filed a corrected Exhibit "1”. The corrected Exhibit "1” sets out those items upon which agreement has been had with Claimant and Respondent in the above cause. This motion was granted, and no further pleadings have been filed herein.

The Attorney General does not contest the veracity nor the propriety of the items and amounts set forth in Claimant’s corrected Exhibit "1”.

The Court, therefore, enters an award in favor of the Claimant in the sum of Five Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-Three and 92/100 Dollars ($5,933.92. The matter of Claimant’s need for additional care is reserved by this Court for future determination.