alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
April 2024

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE - FEET INFLOW RIVER EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

4,194.2

1 1,055.32 4,212.4 18.2 13,055 3,771 0 0 133 0.16 0.00

2 1,055.87 4,228.0 15.6 12,109 4,109 0 0 117 0.14 0.00

3 1,056.52 4,246.5 18.5 13,603 4,110 0 0 143 0.17 0.00

4 1,057.16 4,264.8 18.3 13,965 4,155 0 467 118 0.14 0.06

5 1,057.62 4,278.0 13.2 10,777 4,063 0 0 59 0.07 0.20

6 1,058.05 4,290.4 12.3 10,394 4,094 0 0 76 0.09 0.00

7 1,058.52 4,303.9 13.5 11,001 4,129 0 0 42 0.05 0.01

8 1,058.78 4,311.4 7.5 10,261 6,251 0 79 152 0.18 0.00

9 1,059.22 4,324.1 12.7 12,651 6,089 0 0 153 0.18 0.00

10 1,059.61 4,335.4 11.3 11,683 5,820 0 0 170 0.20 0.00

11 1,059.88 4,343.2 7.8 10,209 6,088 0 0 179 0.21 0.00

12 1,059.61 4,335.4 -7.8 4,845 8,591 0 0 196 0.23 0.00

13 1,059.73 4,338.9 3.5 10,167 8,415 0 0 0 0.00 0.38

14 1,059.93 4,344.7 5.8 11,261 8,332 0 0 9 0.01 1.19

15 1,060.19 4,352.2 7.5 11,604 7,784 0 0 26 0.03 0.04

16 1,060.32 4,356.0 3.8 10,235 8,219 0 0 119 0.14 0.00

17 1,060.51 4,361.5 5.5 11,463 8,512 0 0 179 0.21 0.00

18 1,060.75 4,368.4 6.9 12,044 8,337 0 0 205 0.24 0.00

19 1,060.87 4,371.9 3.5 10,566 8,610 0 0 205 0.24 0.00

20 1,060.91 4,373.1 1.2 9,191 7,611 0 809 188 0.22 0.00

21 1,060.97 4,374.8 1.7 9,439 7,612 0 712 239 0.28 0.00

22 1,061.16 4,380.3 5.5 11,087 8,082 0 0 223 0.26 0.00

23 1,061.06 4,377.4 -2.9 10,346 11,598 0 0 214 0.25 0.00

24 1,060.97 4,374.8 -2.6 9,679 10,842 0 0 154 0.18 0.00

25 1,060.80 4,369.9 -4.9 9,658 12,053 0 0 85 0.10 0.04

26 1,060.67 4,366.1 -3.8 9,553 11,348 0 0 102 0.12 0.00

27 1,060.49 4,360.9 -5.2 7,817 8,212 0 2,120 111 0.13 0.04

28 1,060.45 4,359.7 -1.2 8,199 8,383 0 229 171 0.20 0.00

29 1,060.49 4,360.9 1.2 8,247 7,398 0 0 265 0.31 0.00

30 1,060.60 4,364.1 3.2 8,827 6,966 0 0 256 0.30 0.00

TOTALS 169.8 313,936 219,584 0 4,416 4,289 5.04 1.96

ACRE-FEET 169,800 622,692 435,545 0 8,759 8,507

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 435,545 Outlet 8,759

Spill 0 Total 444,304

Precipitation

This month = 1.96

October 01, 2023 To date = 62.01

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Shasta Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 5/20/2024
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              MARWICH II, LTD.
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Porath,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
#### § 408.1205 How can a State have SSA administer its State recognition payment program?

A State (or political subdivision) may enter into a written agreement with SSA, under which SSA will make recognition payments on behalf of the State (or political subdivision). The regulations in effect for the SVB program also apply in the Federal administration of State recognition payments except as necessary for the effective and efficient administration of both the SVB program and the State's recognition payment program.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.68

 122.83

 123.06

 123.19

 123.53

 123.84

 123.67

 123.66

 123.86

 123.79

 123.73

 123.62

 123.97

 124.52

 125.09

 123.59

 124.59

 124.49

 124.21

 124.07

 124.21

 124.07

 123.66

 123.53

 123.68

 123.91

 123.80

 123.92

 123.50

 123.23

 7,647

 7,715

 7,819

 7,880

 8,040

 8,186

 8,106

 8,101

 8,195

 8,162

 8,134

 8,082

 8,247

 8,521

 8,810

 8,068

 8,556

 8,506

 8,366

 8,296

 8,366

 8,296

 8,101

 8,040

 8,111

 8,219

 8,167

 8,223

 8,026

 7,899

STORAGE

-72

+68

+104

+61

+160

+146

-80

-5

+94

-33

-28

-52

+165

+274

+289

-742

+488

-50

-140

-70

+70

-70

-195

-61

+71

+108

-52

+56

-197

-127

CHANGE

1,998

2,042

2,120

2,081

2,126

2,126

2,018

2,058

2,115

2,041

2,056

2,034

2,154

2,212

2,205

1,693

2,304

2,027

1,975

2,024

2,091

2,009

1,953

2,018

2,081

2,105

2,016

2,085

1,938

1,995

INFLOW

 1,913

 1,887

 1,948

 1,930

 1,924

 1,931

 1,937

 1,940

 1,948

 1,937

 1,949

 1,940

 1,951

 1,954

 1,939

 1,947

 1,938

 1,932

 1,926

 1,938

 1,936

 1,923

 1,930

 1,934

 1,931

 1,935

 1,924

 1,937

 1,917

 1,938

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +180 61,700 58,014 0 1,800 15

ACRE-FEET +180 122,382 115,071 0 3,570 30

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 115,071

SPILL 0

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 3,531

 3,570

 7,719

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 54

 53

 55

 58

 60

 60

 60

 1,780

 3,531

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET) 

TOTAL 122,172

Table 12
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 117

 115

 105

 147

 115

 109

 127

 106

 102

 82

 74

 69

 72

 71

 72

 76

 92

 90

 88

 101

 90

 88

 89

 91

 99

 110

 96

 111

 115

 122

 98

 93

 94

 94

 95

 93

 93

 94

 96

 83

 68

 66

 64

 65

 66

 67

 68

 74

 76

 78

 78

 78

 78

 78

 81

 89

 91

 91

 89

 89

 90

 88

 98

 97

 97

 110

 98

 98

 100

 99

 93

 74

 69

 67

 68

 67

 68

 71

 77

 79

 80

 81

 81

 81

 80

 84

 92

 94

 92

 92

 93

 96

 92

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 4, 2008

HIGH LOW MEAN

 71.7

 71.3

 68.8

 68.7

 67.1

 67.0

 67.9

 67.5

 65.3

 62.0

 57.5

 55.8

 56.3

 57.2

 58.1

 59.3

 59.7

 60.6

 60.7

 60.3

 60.1

 59.8

 59.8

 60.0

 60.4

 60.7

 60.1

 60.8

 60.4

 59.7

 60.5

 67.4

 68.0

 66.4

 66.1

 63.3

 63.1

 62.9

 63.7

 62.2

 57.7

 54.7

 53.5

 53.6

 54.5

 55.2

 56.4

 57.4

 58.9

 58.2

 58.0

 58.0

 57.2

 57.1

 57.0

 57.1

 57.1

 57.5

 57.3

 57.2

 58.1

 58.2

 69.6

 69.5

 67.8

 67.2

 65.3

 65.1

 65.1

 65.6

 63.9

 59.6

 55.9

 54.9

 55.1

 56.0

 56.8

 57.9

 58.7

 59.6

 59.5

 59.3

 59.1

 58.7

 58.6

 58.6

 58.8

 58.9

 58.9

 59.0

 58.9

 58.8

 59.2

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.9

 8.8

 8.9

 8.3

 8.8

 8.9

 8.9

 8.8

 9.1

 9.3

 9.9

 10.1

 10.2

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.6

 9.4

 9.5

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.8

 9.6

 9.5

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 7.7

 7.3

 8.2

 8.3

 8.2

 8.3

 8.7

 9.4

 9.8

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 8.9

 9.3

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 8.1

 9.4

 9.2

 9.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.1

 8.1

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.7

 9.1

 9.7

 10.0

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.6

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.4

 9.4

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
### §286d. Federal Reserve banks as depositories

Any Federal Reserve bank which is requested to do so by the Fund or the Bank shall act as its depository or as its fiscal agent, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall supervise and direct the carrying out of these functions by the Federal Reserve banks.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §6, 59 Stat. 514.)
### §3781. Assets and liabilities of Panama Canal Company

All property and other assets of the Panama Canal Company shall revert to the United States on October 1, 1979, and, except as otherwise provided by law, the United States shall assume the liabilities, including contractual obligations, of the Panama Canal Company then outstanding. The Commission may use such property, facilities, and records of the Panama Canal Company as are necessary to carry out its functions.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1501, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 487.)
FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the Boiler MACT and Definition of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rules

Higgins, Cortney 

to:

Nick Hilosky, RobertJ Wayland, Jim Eddinger, Mimi Guernica, Marc Thomas, George Faison, Thomas Gillis, David Cozzie, Amy 

Hambrick, Gerain Perry

05/25/2012 04:02 PM

Hi all,

Attached is the handout from this meeting.

Regards,

Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the Boiler MACT and Definition of Non-Hazardous Secondary Materials Rules

When: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 2:00 PM-2:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 233 Eisenhower Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by Paul Noe, AF&PA.

(See attached file: 2060-AR13_2012_5_23_AFPA_Handout.pdf)
§ 641.856 What functions and activities constitute administrative costs? ( a ) Administrative costs are that allocable portion of necessary and reasonable allowable costs of recipients and program operators that are associated with those specific functions identified in paragraph (b) of this section and that are not related to the direct provision of programmatic activities specified in § 641.864. These costs may be both personnel and non-personnel and both direct and indirect costs.
( b ) Administrative costs are the costs associated with: ( 1 ) Performing general administrative and coordination functions, including: ( i ) Accounting, budgeting, financial, and cash management functions;
( ii ) Procurement and purchasing functions;
( iii ) Property management functions;
( iv ) Personnel management functions;
( v ) Payroll functions;
( vi ) Coordinating the resolution of findings arising from audits, reviews, investigations, and incident reports;
( vii ) Audit functions;
( viii ) General legal services functions;
( ix ) Developing systems and procedures, including information systems, required for these administrative functions;
( x ) Preparing administrative reports; and
( xi ) Other activities necessary for general administration of government funds and associated programs.
( 2 ) Oversight and monitoring responsibilities related to administrative functions;
( 3 ) Costs of goods and services used for administrative functions of the program, including goods and services such as rental or purchase of equipment, utilities, office supplies, postage, and rental and maintenance of office space;
( 4 ) Travel costs incurred for official business in carrying out administrative activities or the overall management of the program;
( 5 ) Costs of information systems related to administrative functions (for example, personnel, procurement, purchasing, property management, accounting, and payroll systems) including the purchase, systems development, and operating costs of such systems and;
( 6 ) Costs of technical assistance, professional organization membership dues, and evaluating results obtained by the project involved against stated objectives. (OAA § 502(c)(4)).
Exhibit
23.2





Consent
of Independent Auditors








We as
auditors of Challenger Limited, Douglas, Isle of man “Private Company Limited by
shares” have issued our report dated 28 February 2010, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Challenger Limited, Douglas, Isle of man
“Private Company Limited by shares” for the year ended 31 December
2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the said
report included in this Amended Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
31 December 2009 in the Registration Statements of Bronco Drilling Company, Inc.
on Form S-3 (File No. 333-143152), on Form S-3/A (File No. 333-140472) and on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-136874).











/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers





30 April
2010
Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness

Hoodoo

Bighorn - Weitas

Mallard-Larkins

Lochsa Face

Rackliff - Gedney

Pot Mountain

Meadow Creek - Upper North Fork

North Lochsa Slope

Moose Mountain

Siwash

Weir - Post Office Creek

Rawhide

Sneakfoot Meadows

Eldorado Creek

North Fork Spruce - White Sand

Lolo Creek (LNF)

£¤12

¬«11

Pierce

Glenwood

Headquarters

Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Clearwater Existing Plan Management Themes

6 3 0 6 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
### §3922b. Public diplomacy training

#### (a) Statement of policy

The following should be the policy of the United States:

(1) The Foreign Service should recruit individuals with expertise and professional experience in public diplomacy.

(2) United States chiefs of mission should have a prominent role in the formulation of public diplomacy strategies for the countries and regions to which they are assigned and should be accountable for the operation and success of public diplomacy efforts at their posts.

(3) Initial and subsequent training of Foreign Service officers should be enhanced to include information and training on public diplomacy and the tools and technology of mass communication.

#### (b) Personnel

#### (1) Qualifications

In the recruitment, training, and assignment of members of the Foreign Service, the Secretary of State—

(A) should emphasize the importance of public diplomacy and applicable skills and techniques;

(B) should consider the priority recruitment into the Foreign Service, including at middle-level entry, of individuals with expertise and professional experience in public diplomacy, mass communications, or journalism; and

(C) shall give special consideration to individuals with language facility and experience in particular countries and regions.

#### (2) Languages of special interest

The Secretary of State shall seek to increase the number of Foreign Service officers proficient in languages spoken in countries with predominantly Muslim populations. Such increase should be accomplished through the recruitment of new officers and incentives for officers in service.

(Pub. L. 108–458, title VII, §7110, Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3793.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is comprised of section 7110 of Pub. L. 108–458. Subsec. (c) of section 7110 of Pub. L. 108–458 amended section 4003 of this title.

Section was enacted as part of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, and also as part of the 9/11 Commission Implementation Act of 2004, and not as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2047 Waiver of State supplementary payments. ( a ) *Waiver request in writing.* Any person who is eligible to receive State supplementary payments or who would be eligible to receive such State supplementary payments may waive his right to receive such payments if such person makes a written request for waiver of State supplementary payments. Any such request made at time of application for the Federal benefit shall be effective immediately. Any such request filed after the application is filed shall be effective the month the request is received in a social security office, or earlier if the recipient refunds to the Social Security Administration the amount of any supplementary payment(s) made to him for the subject period.
( b ) *Revocation of waiver.* Any individual who has waived State supplementary payments may revoke such waiver at any time by making a written request to any social security office. The revocation will be effective the month in which it is filed. The date such request is received in a social security office or the postmarked date, if the written request was mailed, will be the filing date, whichever is earlier.
### §3506. Deputy Director

#### (a) Appointment; compensation

A Deputy Director of the Institute shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Deputy Director shall receive compensation at the rate payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule under section 5315 of title 5.

#### (b) Duties and powers

The Deputy Director shall perform such duties and exercise such powers as the Director may prescribe.

#### (c) Additional positions; establishment by President; compensation

The President may establish up to two additional positions in the Institute to be compensated at the rate payable for level V of the Executive Schedule under section 5316 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 96–53, title IV, §406, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 374.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 512(a) of Pub. L. 96–53, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
### §130aa. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "endowment fund" means a fund, or a tax exempt foundation, established and maintained by Howard University for the purpose of generating income for its support, but which shall not include real estate;

(2) the term "endowment fund corpus" means an amount equal to the grants awarded under this subchapter plus an amount equal to such grants provided by Howard University;

(3) the term "endowment fund income" means an amount equal to the total value of the endowment fund established under this subchapter minus the endowment fund corpus;

(4) the term "Secretary" means the Secretary of Education; and

(5) the term "University" means the Howard University established by the Act of March 2, 1867.

(Pub. L. 98–480, title II, §202, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2245.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Act of March 2, 1867, referred to in par. (5), is act Mar. 2, 1867, ch. 162, 14 Stat. 438. Section 8 of this Act is classified to section 123 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Pub. L. 98–480, title II, §209, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2247, provided that: "This title [see Short Title note below] shall take effect on October 1, 1984."

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–480, title II, §201, Oct. 17, 1984, 98 Stat. 2245, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter, amending section 123 of this title, and enacting provisions set out as a note above] may be cited as the 'Howard University Endowment Act'."
#### § 669.210 How does an eligible entity become an NFJP grantee?

To become an NFJP grantee and receive a grant under this subpart, an applicant must respond to a Solicitation for Grant Applications (SGA). The SGA may contain additional requirements for the grant application or the grantee's two-year plan. Under the SGA, grantees will be selected using standard Federal Government competitive procedures. The entity's proposal must describe a two-year strategy for meeting the needs of eligible migrant and seasonal farmworkers in the geographic area the entity seeks to serve.
§ 641.930 Is there an alternative dispute resolution process that may be used in place of an OALJ hearing? ( a ) Parties to a complaint that has been filed according to the requirements of § 641.920 (a), (c), and (d) may choose to waive their rights to an administrative hearing before the OALJ. Instead, they may choose to transfer the settlement of their dispute to an individual acceptable to all parties who will conduct an informal review of the stipulated facts and render a decision in accordance with applicable law. A written decision must be issued within 60 days after submission of the matter for informal review.
( b ) Unless the parties agree in writing to extend the period, the waiver of the right to request a hearing before the OALJ will automatically be revoked if a settlement has not been reached or a decision has not been issued within the 60 days provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The decision rendered under this informal review process will be treated as the final agency decision.
### §3621. Security legislation

It is the sense of the Congress that the best interests of the United States require that the President enter into negotiations with the Republic of Panama for the purpose of arranging for the stationing of United States military forces, after the termination of the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977, in the area comprising the Canal Zone before October 1, 1979, and for the maintenance of installations and facilities, after the termination of such Treaty, for the use of United States military forces stationed in such area. The President shall report to the Congress in a timely manner the status of negotiations conducted pursuant to this section.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1111, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 459.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions vested in President by this section delegated to Secretary of State who shall perform such functions in coordination with Secretary of Defense, see section 1–401 of Ex. Ord. No. 12215, May 27, 1980, 45 F.R. 36044, set out as a note under section 3601 of this title.