alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 684.320 Are there any restrictions on allowable activities? ( a ) Training services must be directly linked to an in-demand industry sector or occupation in the service area, or in another area to which a participant receiving such services is willing to relocate.
( b ) INA program grantees must provide on-the-job training (OJT) services consistent with the definition provided in WIOA sec. 3(44) and other limitations in WIOA. Individuals in OJT must: ( 1 ) Be compensated at the same rates, including periodic increases, as trainees or employees who are similarly situated in similar occupations by the same employer and who have similar training, experience, and skills; and
( 2 ) Be provided benefits and working conditions at the same level and to the same extent as other trainees or employees working a similar length of time and doing the same type of work.
( c ) In addition, OJT contracts under this title must not be entered into with employers who have: ( 1 ) Received payments under previous contracts under WIOA or the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 and have exhibited a pattern of failing to provide OJT participants with continued, long-term employment as regular employees with wages and employment benefits (including health benefits) and working conditions at the same level and to the same extent as other employees working a similar length of time and doing the same type of work; or
( 2 ) Have exhibited a pattern of violating paragraphs (b)(1) and/or (2) of this section.
( d ) INA program grantees are prohibited from using funds to encourage the relocation of a business, as described in WIOA sec. 181(d) and § 683.260 of this chapter.
( e ) INA program grantees must only use WIOA funds for activities that are in addition to those that would otherwise be available to the INA population in the area in the absence of such funds.
( f ) INA program grantees must not spend funds on activities that displace currently employed individuals, impair existing contracts for services, or in any way affect union organizing.
( g ) Under § 683.255 of this chapter, sectarian activities involving WIOA financial assistance or participants are limited in accordance with the provisions of sec. 188(a)(3) of WIOA.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10338]



[[Page 25487]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; MSM Program Review.
    Date: June 12, 2012.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Manana Sukhareva, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy 
Boulevard, Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-3397, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#582b2d3330392a3d35183539313476363130763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="86f5f3edeee7f4e3ebc6ebe7efeaa8e8efeea8e1e9f0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 23, 2012.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-10338 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# FILED

November 9, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk 

## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

SI J. WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Davidson Circuit ) No. 95-D-3793 VS. ) ) Appeal No. MARY C. WILLIAMS, ) 01A01-9709-CV-00522 ) Defendant/Appel

lant. )



### CONCURRING OP INION

I concur with the re sults of this opinion. H owever, I am

fil ing th is separate opinion to clarify m

y understanding of

the significance of

the portion of the dec

ision dealingwith the need of the parties’ daughter for continuing support past her eighteenth birth day.

Mr. Williams’ s cruel treatm ent of his daughter has left deep emotiona l scars. The evidence introduced

at trial, including

the evidence of

repeated hospitaliz

ations and continui ng outpat ient treat ment, leaves l ittle room fo r doubt th at the girl ’s prob lems are real and genui ne. However,

the tr i al court apparently declined to require Mr. Williams to support his daughter after her eightee nth birthday beca

use it gave little weight to the opinion offered by the psychological counselor who had been treating the girl fo

r four years.

The counselor’s opinion about the girl’s current socialization and her continuing

need for therapy is extremely equivocal, and for that reason, I agree that Ms. Williams did not carry her burden of proving that Mr. Willi ams should be required to continueto support his daughter. However, the

trial court’s ex

planation of its decision could also be interpreted to mean that the girl’s co

ndition is not

the sort of condition that warrants fur

ther therapy a

nd that the girl’s counselor is not qualified-2-

to render an opinion on the issue because he is a psychologist with a master’s degree rather than an psychiatr

ist with a medi

c al degree. Our opinion should not be construed as agreeing with eith er of these interpr

etations. Based on t

he facts in the record, the treating psy

chologist was qualif

ied under Tenn. R.

Evid. 702 to render an opinion concerning his patie

nt’s condition and shou

ld have been permitted under Tenn. R. Evid. 703 to use her me dical records as a

basis for his opinion.

_________________________________ WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 721.66

 721.66

 721.89

 721.92

 721.92

 722.03

 722.03

 722.03

 722.03

 722.19

 722.24

 722.24

 722.24

 722.24

 722.24

 722.36

 722.36

 722.36

 722.36

 722.36

 722.36

 722.36

 723.14

 723.14

 723.43

 723.52

 723.61

 723.69

 723.78

 723.87

 723.93

 1,246

 1,246

 1,255

 1,256

 1,256

 1,260

 1,260

 1,260

 1,260

 1,266

 1,268

 1,268

 1,268

 1,268

 1,268

 1,272

 1,272

 1,272

 1,272

 1,272

 1,272

 1,272

 1,301

 1,301

 1,312

 1,316

 1,319

 1,322

 1,326

 1,329

 1,331

STORAGE

+0

+0

+9

+1

+0

+4

+0

+0

+0

+6

+2

+0

+0

+0

+0

+4

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+29

+0

+11

+4

+3

+3

+4

+3

+2

CHANGE

0

0

5

1

0

2

0

0

0

3

1

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

15

0

6

2

2

2

2

2

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2017 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 1, 2017

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +85 46 0 0

ACRE-FEET +85 91 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 1,246

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
### §2686a. Appointment of Special Coordinator for water policy negotiations and water resources policy

#### (a) Designation

The Secretary of State shall designate a Special Coordinator—

(1) to coordinate the United States Government response to international water resource disputes and needs;

(2) to represent the United States Government, whenever appropriate, in multilateral fora in discussions concerning access to fresh water; and

(3) to formulate United States policy to assist in the resolution of international problems posed by the lack of fresh water supplies.

#### (b) Other responsibilities

The individual designated under subsection (a) may carry out the functions of subsection (a) in addition to other assigned responsibilities.

(Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §180, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 682.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authority of Secretary of State

Except as otherwise provided, Secretary of State to have and exercise any authority vested by law in any official or office of Department of State and references to such officials or offices deemed to refer to Secretary of State or Department of State, as appropriate, see section 2651a of this title and section 161(d) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.
#### § 702.318 The record; what constitutes; nontransferability of the administrative file.

For the purpose of any further proceedings under the Act, the formal record of proceedings shall consist of the hearing record made before the administrative law judge (see § 702.344). When transferring the case for hearing pursuant to § 702.317, the district director shall not transfer the administrative file under any circumstances.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 6

- 00 332

- C R



### ____________________

DAVID RICHARD SMOTHERS

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 359th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 12

- 04

- 03934

- CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

David Richard Smothers has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by the appellant

personally and joined by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is theref ore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

___________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on D ecember 27, 2016

Opinion Delivered D ecember 28, 2016

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
### §2349aa–4. Authorization of appropriations

(a) There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out this part $72,000,000 for fiscal year 2001, $73,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, and $64,200,000 for fiscal year 2003.

(b) Amounts appropriated under this section are authorized to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. II, §574, formerly §575, as added Pub. L. 98–151, §101(b)(2), Nov. 14, 1983, 97 Stat. 972; amended Pub. L. 99–83, title V, §501(a), Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 219; Pub. L. 99–399, title IV, §401(a)(2), Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 862; renumbered §574, Pub. L. 104–164, title I, §121(d), July 21, 1996, 110 Stat. 1428; Pub. L. 106–280, title IV, §401, Oct. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 854; Pub. L. 107–228, div. B, title XII, §1251, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1433.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 574 of Pub. L. 87–195 was classified to section 2349aa–3 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–164.

#### Amendments

2002—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 107–228 substituted ", $73,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, and $64,200,000 for fiscal year 2003" for "and $73,000,000 for fiscal year 2002".

2000—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 106–280 substituted "$72,000,000 for fiscal year 2001 and $73,000,000 for fiscal year 2002" for "$9,840,000 for fiscal year 1986 and $14,680,000 for fiscal year 1987".

1986—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 99–399 substituted "$14,680,000 for the fiscal year 1987" for "$9,840,000 for the fiscal year 1987".

1985—Pub. L. 99–83, in amending section generally, designated existing provisions as subsecs. (a) and (b), and in subsec. (a) as so designated, substituted provisions appropriating $9,840,000 for fiscal years 1986 and 1987 for provisions appropriating $5,000,000 for fiscal year 1984.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–83 effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 99–83, set out as a note under section 2151–1 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1167 Temporary absences and deeming rules. ( a ) *General.* During a temporary absence, we continue to consider the absent person a member of the household. A temporary absence occurs when— ( 1 ) You, your ineligible spouse, parent, or an ineligible child leaves the household but intends to and does return in the same month or the month immediately following; or
( 2 ) You enter a medical treatment facility and are eligible for either benefit payable under § 416.212. We consider your absence to be temporary through the last month benefits under § 416.212 were paid unless you were discharged from the facility in the following month. In that case, we consider your absence to be temporary through the date of discharge.
( b ) *Child away at school.* If you are an eligible child who is away at school but comes home on some weekends or lengthy holidays and if you are subject to the control of your parents, we consider you temporarily absent from your parents' household. However, if you are not subject to parental control, we do not consider your absence temporary and we do not deem parental income (or resources) to you. Being subject to parental control affects deeming to you only if you are away at school.
( c ) *Active duty military service.* If your ineligible spouse or parent is absent from the household due solely to a duty assignment as a member of the Armed Forces on active duty, we continue to consider that person to be living in the same household as you, absent evidence to the contrary. If we determine that during such an absence, evidence indicates that your spouse or parent should no longer be considered to be living in the same household as you, then deeming will cease. When such evidence exists, we determine the month in which your spouse or parent should no longer be considered to be living in the same household as you and stop deeming his or her income and resources beginning with the month following that month.
Example: Tom is a child who receives SSI. In January 1996, Tom's father leaves the household due solely to an active duty assignment as a member of the Armed Forces. Five months later in June 1996, while Tom's father is still on an active duty assignment, Tom's parents file for divorce. As a result, Tom's father will not be returning to live in Tom's household. Therefore, Tom's father should no longer be considered to be living in the same household with Tom. Beginning July 1, 1996, deeming from Tom's father will cease.
[50 FR 48579, Nov. 26, 1985, as amended at 61 FR 10280, Mar. 13, 1996; 62 FR 42411, Aug. 7, 1997; 72 FR 50874, Sept. 5, 2007]
EXHIBIT 99.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, John Roblin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Registrant"), certify that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 of the
Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


/s/ John Roblin
---------------
Name: John Roblin
Date: November 13, 2002
This .zip file contains graphic files (in .png format) of each chart and graph in the Economic Research Service report "Vietnam’s Agri-Food Sector and the Trans-Pacific Partnership" EIB-130, published in October 2014. The content and context of these files is as of the publication date of the report. After time, the material may not reflect the current ERS program of work, may be outdated, and/or superseded, so please visit the website to obtain the latest information: www.ers.usda.gov. Any reuse of these images should include attribution to "Economic Research Service/USDA."The following inventory lists each of the files in this folder.File name			Description       (Fig01.png)			Figure 1 - Vietnamese exports to the world, selected sectors, 2000-12   (Fig02.png)			Figure 2 - Vietnamese agricultural value-added as a share of GDP, 1985-2012(Fig03.png)			Figure 3 - Agricultural value-added as a share of GDP for selected countries, 2011   (Fig04.png)			Figure 4 - Vietnam real GDP per capita and real GDP, 1986-2013(Fig05.png)			Figure 5 - Vietnamese rice production and exports, 1960-2013(Fig06.png)			Figure 6 - Vietnam's production of selected export crops, 1961-2012(Fig07.png)			Figure 7 - Vietnamese caloric intake per day, 1961-2009(Fig08.png)			Figure 8 - Vietnamese agricultural trade and trade agreements, 1990-2011  (Fig09.png)			Figure 9 - Vietnamese agricultural imports by commodity class(Fig10.png)			Figure 10 - Vietnamese agricultural trade with potential TPP partners in 2012(BoxFig01.png)			Box figure 1 - Vietnamese fishery exports to United States, 1994-2012(BoxFig02.png)			Box figure 2 - Vietnamese fishery exports to the rest of the world (excluding the �United States), 1994-2012
<page>

	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund II (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A. Rothman,
President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.






By:  /s/Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:   Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:  President

Date:   August 15, 2005
### §7844. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees

#### (a) Actions in China

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the Government of China has obligated itself to provide the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) with unimpeded access to North Koreans inside its borders to enable the UNHCR to determine whether they are refugees and whether they require assistance, pursuant to the 1951 United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, and Article III, paragraph 5 of the 1995 Agreement on the Upgrading of the UNHCR Mission in the People's Republic of China to UNHCR Branch Office in the People's Republic of China (referred to in this section as the "UNHCR Mission Agreement");

(2) the United States, other UNHCR donor governments, and UNHCR should persistently and at the highest levels continue to urge the Government of China to abide by its previous commitments to allow UNHCR unimpeded access to North Korean refugees inside China;

(3) the UNHCR, in order to effectively carry out its mandate to protect refugees, should liberally employ as professionals or Experts on Mission persons with significant experience in humanitarian assistance work among displaced North Koreans in China;

(4) the UNHCR, in order to effectively carry out its mandate to protect refugees, should liberally contract with appropriate nongovernmental organizations that have a proven record of providing humanitarian assistance to displaced North Koreans in China;

(5) the UNHCR should pursue a multilateral agreement to adopt an effective "first asylum" policy that guarantees safe haven and assistance to North Korean refugees; and

(6) should the Government of China begin actively fulfilling its obligations toward North Korean refugees, all countries, including the United States, and relevant international organizations should increase levels of humanitarian assistance provided inside China to help defray costs associated with the North Korean refugee presence.

#### (b) Arbitration proceedings

It is further the sense of Congress that—

(1) if the Government of China continues to refuse to provide the UNHCR with access to North Koreans within its borders, the UNHCR should initiate arbitration proceedings pursuant to Article XVI of the UNHCR Mission Agreement and appoint an arbitrator for the UNHCR; and

(2) because access to refugees is essential to the UNHCR mandate and to the purpose of a UNHCR branch office, a failure to assert those arbitration rights in present circumstances would constitute a significant abdication by the UNHCR of one of its core responsibilities.

(Pub. L. 108–333, title III, §304, Oct. 18, 2004, 118 Stat. 1296.)
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### N OTICE OF 

### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 13

- 00547

- CV

Style: Jordan D. Houghtaling

v

. Nichol A. Houghtaling

Date motion filed * : July 23, 2013

Type of motion: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Parties' Notification to Court of Mediator

If motion to extend time:

Deadline to file document: July 22, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 0

Length of extension sought: 20 days

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: August 12, 2013

 The Clerk is instructed to file the document as of the date of this order

 Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend

time

 Denied

 Dis missed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

The parties shall conduct mediation by September 11, 2013. No later than two days from the

conclusion of the mediation, the parties and the mediator shall advise the Clerk of this Court in

writing whether t he parties did or did not settle the underlying dispute, and the mediator shall file

with the Clerk of this Court a completed “Appointment and Fee Report

– Mediation” form.

Judge's signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: July 26, 2013