alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §4011. Termination of limited appointments

Except as provided in section 4010(a)(2) of this title, the Secretary may terminate at any time the appointment of any member of the Service serving under a limited appointment who is in the Senior Foreign Service, who is assigned to a salary class in the Foreign Service Schedule or who is paid in accordance with section 3967 of this title or is a United States citizen paid under a compensation plan under section 3968 of this title.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §612, formerly §611, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2099; renumbered §612 and amended Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §§180(a)(7), 181(a)(1), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 416.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 612 of Pub. L. 96–465 was renumbered section 613 and is classified to section 4012 of this title.

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–236, §180(a)(7), substituted "or who is paid in accordance with section 3967 of this title or is a United States citizen paid under a compensation plan under section 3968 of this title." for ", or who is a family member of a Government employee serving under a local compensation plan established under section 3968 of this title."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999
     (Unaudited) AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE NINE
     MONTHS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,636,723
<SECURITIES>                                 1,305,717
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,847,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                   381,319
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,994,886
<PP&E>                                       2,615,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                 915,339
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,260,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,334,070
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,820
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,878,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,260,647
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,729,654
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,608,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               152,845
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,067,303
<INCOME-TAX>                                   423,672
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            643,631
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   643,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,053.49

 1,053.25

 1,052.98

 1,052.72

 1,052.35

 1,052.13

 1,051.84

 1,051.55

 1,051.28

 1,051.05

 1,050.64

 1,050.24

 1,049.99

 1,049.67

 1,049.42

 1,049.18

 1,048.98

 1,048.62

 1,048.22

 1,047.93

 1,047.62

 1,047.38

 1,047.11

 1,046.68

 1,046.23

 1,045.85

 1,045.60

 1,045.32

 1,045.07

 1,044.78

 4,160.6

 4,153.8

 4,146.2

 4,139.0

 4,128.6

 4,122.4

 4,114.3

 4,106.2

 4,098.7

 4,092.3

 4,080.9

 4,069.8

 4,062.8

 4,054.0

 4,047.1

 4,040.4

 4,034.9

 4,025.0

 4,014.0

 4,006.1

 3,997.6

 3,991.0

 3,983.6

 3,971.9

 3,959.6

 3,949.3

 3,942.5

 3,934.9

 3,928.1

 3,920.3

STORAGE

-6.5

-6.8

-7.6

-7.3

-10.4

-6.2

-8.1

-8.1

-7.5

-6.4

-11.4

-11.1

-6.9

-8.8

-6.9

-6.6

-5.5

-9.9

-11.0

-8.0

-8.5

-6.6

-7.4

-11.7

-12.3

-10.3

-6.8

-7.6

-6.8

-7.8

CHANGE

 3,922

 4,125

 3,745

 3,481

 2,521

 4,371

 3,720

 3,782

 3,937

 5,029

 2,200

 2,072

 3,907

 3,504

 4,145

 4,418

 4,854

 3,301

 3,062

 4,582

 4,595

 4,474

 4,364

 2,672

 2,345

 2,732

 4,477

 4,451

 4,172

 3,965

INFLOW

 6,889

 7,259

 7,288

 6,875

 7,503

 7,299

 7,479

 7,615

 7,472

 7,986

 7,633

 7,369

 7,145

 7,564

 7,299

 7,648

 7,501

 8,269

 8,341

 8,357

 8,510

 7,536

 7,810

 8,313

 8,238

 7,694

 7,575

 7,800

 7,311

 7,621

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 150

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 298

 273

 289

 280

 247

 181

 329

 246

 262

 278

 310

 302

 261

 399

 179

 114

 138

 24

 267

 242

 363

 250

 281

 273

 288

 248

 320

 479

 279

 294

C.F.S.

 .36

 .33

 .35

 .34

 .30

 .22

 .40

 .30

 .32

 .34

 .38

 .37

 .32

 .49

 .22

 .14

 .17

 .03

 .33

 .30

 .45

 .31

 .35

 .34

 .36

 .31

 .40

 .60

 .35

 .37

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .08

 1.35

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2016 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 19, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -246.8 112,925 229,199 0 150 7,994 9.85 1.46

ACRE-FEET -246,800 223,987 454,616 0 298 15,856

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 454,616

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 298

 454,914

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.46

JULY 1, 2015 67.23

 4,167.1

Table 3
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.701 Scope of subpart. ( a ) *Report provisions.* The Social Security Administration, to achieve efficient administration of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program for the Aged, Blind, and Disabled, requires that you (or your representative) must report certain events to us. It is important for us to know about these events because they may affect your continued eligibility for SSI benefits or the amount of your benefits. This subpart tells you what events you must report; what your reports must include; and when reports are due. The rules regarding reports are in §§ 416.704 through 416.714.
( b ) *Penalty deductions.* If you fail to make a required report when it is due, you may suffer a penalty. This subpart describes the penalties; discusses when we may impose them; and explains that we will not impose a penalty if you have good cause for failing to report timely. The rules regarding penalties are in §§ 416.722 through 416.732.
#### § 670.100 What is the scope of this part?

The regulations in this part are an outline of the requirements that apply to the Job Corps program. More detailed policies and procedures are contained in a Policy and Requirements Handbook issued by the Secretary. Throughout this part, phrases like “according to instructions (procedures) issued by the Secretary” refer to the Policy and Requirements Handbook and other Job Corps directives.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       15
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LUIS ODILON MOLINA-HERNANDEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10264

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00140-PGR-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010 ** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Luis Odilon Molina-Hernandez appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and

57-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

FILED

JUL 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10264

§ 1326(a). 

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Molina-Hernandez’s

counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion

to withdraw as counsel of record. The appellant has not filed a pro se supplemental

brief, but he has submitted a letter requesting appointment of new counsel. No

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and MolinaHernandez’s request for new counsel is DENIED.

DISMISSED.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT M IGUEL C ASTELLANOS M AR T INEZ, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 14-71384 Age n c y No. A205-714-528 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 24, 2016 * * B e fore : LEAVY, FER NANDEZ, a

nd R AW LINSON, C irc uit Judge s. M igue l C a ste lla

n os M a rtine z , a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o , pe t itions for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l and de ny i ng his motion to re m and. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. 

# FIL ED MAR 01 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).W e re vie wfor a buse of disc re tion the de n i a l of a m otion to re m and. Rome ro-Ruiz v . Muk ase y , 538 F.3d 1057, 1062 (9th C ir. 2008). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing C a s te lla nos M artine z ’ s m otion to re m and for fa ilure to e sta blish pre judic e , whe re C a ste l la

nos M artine z fa ile d to e xpla in wha

t e vide nc e prior c ounse l fa ile d to submit tha t m a y have a ffe c te d the outc om e of his proc e e dings. Martine z-He rnande

z v . Holde r, 778 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th C ir. 2015) (finding the pe t itione r c ould not e sta

blish pre judic e whe re he ha d

offe re d no a

rgum e nt or e vide nc e to ba c k up his c la im for re lie f); se e also Ortiz v. IN

S, 179 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th C i r. 1999) (de ny ing thepe t ition whe re pe titione rs re que ste d re m and to e xpla in e ligibility for a sy lum , but fa ile d to e sta blish wha t e vide nc e the y

would pre se nt on re m and). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 4 - 7 1 3 8 4 2
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-21-00016-CV

__________________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.D.

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 253rd District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CV2015473

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

C.G. appeals from an order terminating her parental rights to her minor child, 

K.D. The trial court found, by clear and convincing evidence, that statutory grounds 

exist for termination of C.G.’s parental rights and that termination of her parental 

rights would be in the best interest of K.D. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §

161.001(b)(1)(D), (E), (N), (O), (P), (2). 

C.G.’s appointed counsel submitted a brief in which counsel contends that 

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced on appeal. See Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967); In the Interest of L.D.T., 161 S.W.3d 728, 731 (Tex. App.—

Beaumont 2005, no pet.). The brief provides counsel’s professional evaluation of the 
2

record. Counsel served C.G. with a copy of the Anders brief filed on her behalf. This 

Court notified C.G. of her right to file a pro se response, as well as the deadline for 

doing so. This Court did not receive a pro se response. 

We have independently reviewed the appellate record and counsel’s brief, and 

we agree that any appeal would be frivolous. We find no arguable error requiring us 

to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief this appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s order 

terminating C.G.’s parental rights.

AFFIRMED.

_________________________

 W. SCOTT GOLEMON

 Chief Justice

Submitted on April 12, 2021

Opinion Delivered April 29, 2021

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
December 29, 2008





/s/
      Liu Yu ChuanLiu
      Yu ChuanChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
#### Frances B. Mendoza, Respondent, v. Armando E. Mendoza, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements, with leave to the defendant to answer within ten days after service of the order, with notice of entry thereof, on payment of said costs. No opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Van Voorhis, JJ.
#### § 661.320 Who must chair a Local Board?

The Local Board must elect a chairperson from among the business representatives on the board. (WIA sec. 117(b)(5).)
##### 



DAIMLERCHRYSLER AUTO TRUSTS
  1.
    
    DCFS is, as of the date hereof, the Administrator of the Issuers.2.
    
    The undersigned are Officers of the Administrator and are duly authorized
pursuant to the Agreements to execute and deliver this Certificate on behalf of the
Issuer to the Indenture Trustee.3.
    
    A review of the activities of the Issuer during the calendar year ended
December 31, 2005, and of their performance under the Agreements was conducted under
our supervision.4.
    
    Based on such review, the Issuer has, to the best of our knowledge, complied
in all material respects with all conditions and covenants under the Agreements and no
default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as
set forth in paragraph 5 below.5.
    
    There were no defaults made by the Issuers in the performance of all
conditions and covenants under the provisions of the Agreements during the year ended
December 31, 2005.
   /s/ Andree Ohmstedt
    
    /s/ Mark L. DavisAndree Ohmstedt
    
    Mark L. DavisVice President and
    
    Assistant ControllerController
    
    Financial Reporting and Policy




---



##### 



Issuer
    
    Indenture Dated
    
    Indenture Trustee
    
    Owner TrusteeDCAT 2001-B
    
    June 1, 2001
    
    Bank One, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2001-C
    
    September 1, 2001
    
    Citibank, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2001-D
    
    November 1, 2001
    
    Citibank, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2002-A
    
    April 1, 2002
    
    Bank One, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2002-B
    
    July 1, 2002
    
    Bank One, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2002-C
    
    October 1, 2002
    
    Citibank, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2003-A
    
    August 1, 2003
    
    Citibank, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2003-B
    
    December 1, 2003
    
    Deutsche Bank
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2004-A
    
    March 1, 2004
    
    Citibank, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2004-B
    
    July 1, 2004
    
    JPMorgan Chase Bank
    
    Deutsche Bank Trust Company DelawareDCAT 2004-C
    
    November 1, 2004
    
    Citibank, N.A.
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2005-A
    
    January 1, 2005
    
    Deutsche Bank
    
    Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National AssociationDCAT 2005-B
    
    May 1, 2005
    
    Citibank, N.A.
    
    Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,338

 3,498

 2,505

 2,593

 3,015

 3,154

 2,267

 1,995

 2,192

 3,099

 2,446

 3,926

 2,902

-728

 3,987

 2,916

 2,473

 1,629

 1,423

 3,890

 2,842

 2,421

 3,348

 2,178

 2,351

 2,162

 2,130

 2,242

 1,934

 3,085

 3,198

 57,222

 56,582

 57,076

 56,602

 56,236

 56,288

 56,470

 55,800

 54,905

 54,242

 54,474

 54,074

 55,100

 55,102

 51,656

 52,860

 52,988

 52,688

 51,601

 50,373

 51,549

 51,672

 51,388

 51,999

 51,469

 51,129

 50,626

 50,118

 49,742

 49,092

 49,569

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2020 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: November 4, 2020

 59,560

 60,080

 59,581

 59,195

 59,251

 59,442

 58,737

 57,795

 57,097

 57,341

 56,920

 58,000

 58,002

 54,374

 55,643

 55,776

 55,461

 54,317

 53,024

 54,263

 54,391

 54,093

 54,736

 54,177

 53,820

 53,291

 52,756

 52,360

 51,676

 52,177

 52,767

 5,831,000

 5,809,000

 5,788,000

 5,767,000

 5,745,000

 5,724,000

 5,703,000

 5,682,000

 5,660,000

 5,639,000

 5,618,000

 5,596,000

 5,575,000

 5,554,000

 5,532,000

 5,511,000

 5,490,000

 5,468,000

 5,447,000

 5,426,000

 5,404,000

 5,383,000

 5,362,000

 5,341,000

 5,319,000

 5,298,000

 5,277,000

 5,255,000

 5,234,000

 5,213,000

 5,191,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 60,234
#### § 661.355 When must a local plan be modified?

The Governor must establish procedures governing the modification of local plans. Situations in which modifications may be required by the Governor include significant changes in local economic conditions, changes in the financing available to support WIA title I and partner-provided WIA services, changes to the Local Board structure, or a need to revise strategies to meet performance goals.
§ 650.3 Secretary's interpretation of Federal law requirements. ( a ) The Secretary interprets sections 303(a)(1) and 303(a)(3) above to require that a State law include provision for— ( 1 ) Hearing and decision for claimants who are parties to an appeal from a benefit determination to an administrative tribunal with the greatest promptness that is administratively feasible, and
( 2 ) Such methods of administration of the appeals process as will reasonably assure hearing and decision with the greatest promptness that is administratively feasible.
( b ) The Secretary interprets section 303(b)(2) above to require a State to comply substantially with provisions specified in paragraph (a) of this section.