alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-4812

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY RANDALL BREEDEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.

(CR-00-70020)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 4, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Woodford, Colorado Springs, Colorado, for Appellant.

Eileen J. O’Connor, Assistant Attorney General, Robert E. Lindsay,

Alan Hechtkopf, S. Robert Lyons, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey R. Breeden was convicted by a jury of two counts of

attempted income tax evasion, 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (1994), and two

counts of willful failure to file tax returns, 26 U.S.C. § 7203

(1994), for which he was sentenced to thirty-six months imprisonment. Breeden appeals, claiming that the district court erred in

refusing to give two proffered jury instructions. We review the

district court’s refusal to give a requested jury instruction for

abuse of discretion. United States v. Russell, 971 F.2d 1098, 1107

(4th Cir. 1992); United States v. Lozano, 839 F.2d 1020, 1024 (4th

Cir. 1988). A district court has discretion to choose among proposed instructions and to determine the content of its charge to

the jury, Russell, 971 F.2d at 1107, as long as, when “viewed as a

whole in the context of the trial, the charge was not misleading

and contained an adequate statement of the law to guide the jury’s

determination,” United States v. Park, 421 U.S. 658, 675 (1975).

Viewing the jury instructions in the context of the entire

trial, we conclude that they were proper in all respects. We

therefore find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §2768. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–106, div. A, title X, §1064(a), Feb. 10, 1996, 110 Stat. 445

Section, Pub. L. 90–629, ch. 2, §28, as added Pub. L. 96–92, §16(a), Oct. 29, 1979, 93 Stat. 708; amended Pub. L. 97–113, title I, §101(b), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1520; Pub. L. 100–461, title V, §588(a), Oct. 1, 1988, 102 Stat. 2268–51, related to reports on price and availability estimates.
#### § 663.155 How are core services delivered?

Core services must be provided through the One-Stop delivery system. Core services may be provided directly by the One-Stop operator or through contracts with service providers that are approved by the Local Board. The Local Board may only be a provider of core services when approved by the chief elected official and the Governor in accordance with the requirements of WIA section 117(f)(2) and 20 CFR 661.310.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 739

 745

 664

 657

 583

 701

 636

 765

 739

 743

 800

 696

 829

 949

 869

 831

 717

 634

 452

 545

 728

 662

 717

 648

 882

 812

 910

 920

 1,163

 817

 187

 172

 204

 189

 189

 203

 181

 186

 182

 181

 192

 195

 190

 186

 175

 197

 206

 190

 172

 179

 178

 175

 172

 174

 173

 176

 178

 180

 178

 203

 360

 387

 385

 399

 393

 441

 389

 366

 400

 378

 384

 350

 374

 418

 407

 402

 371

 328

 312

 311

 351

 347

 334

 314

 350

 357

 363

 374

 496

 443

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
(No. 74-CC-258

#### Public Electric Construction Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Capital Development Board, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Landesman & Schwartz, Attorneys for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Martin A. Soll, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4434 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 17, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4434 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

3 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En5 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 13287, the 

6 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

7 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

8 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest require9 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

10 under that section, extend the time period during which 

11 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

12 the project for up to four consecutive 2-year periods from 

13 the date of the expiration of the time period required for 

14 commencement of construction prescribed in the license. 

15 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

16 period required for commencement of construction of the 

17 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

19 reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4434 RFS 

1 expiration and the first extension authorized under sub2 section (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 16, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of John S. Shields against Harry W. Marsh et al., Constituting the Municipal Civil Service Commission of the City of New York, et al.

Present—Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Glennon, J., taking no part.
RECEIVED 

FEB 2 8 2017 

u.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HEARING DOr~ 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS lJ 

WASHINGTON, DC 

***************************** 

In the Matter of: * 

MACH ONE AIR CHARTERS, INC. * Docket No. FAA-2015-0643 

* Case No. 2014WP210018 

* ALJ-RAWALD 

* 

***************************** 

TO: The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge, and Respondent, through 

counsel: 

COMPLAINANT'S OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS 

COMES NOW, Complainant, by and through counsel, objects on the following grounds 

to certain of Respondent's proposed exhibits, which were received by the undersigned on 

February 22, 2017. 

Complainant objects to Respondent's 5 videos, identified as 009.mpg, 01 O.mpg, 

Oll.mpg, and 013.mpg and Respondent's 5 photographs identified as OOl.jpg, 002.jpg, 003.jpg, 

004.jpg, and 008.jpg. These proposed exhibits are inadmissible, and no evidence can be 

produced to satisfY the requirement of authentication. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Naomi Tsuda 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

For Enforcement 

By:~ Lisa Toscano, Attorney 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

email: Lisa.M.Toscano(illfaa.gov 

Telephone: (310) 725-7100 (main)· 

(310) 725-7110 (direct) 

(31 0) 725-6816 (fax) 

Dated: February 24, 2017 
DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-0643 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this date I have sent a copy of the foregoing COMPLAINANT'S 

OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS by U.S. Certified Mail- return 

receipt requested and by either facsimile transmission or electronic mail, as indicated, to the 

following: 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

Steven L. Graff, Esq. 

Steven L. Graff, Inc. 

43399 Calle De Velardo 

Temecula, CA 92592 

Email: aviationcounsel!lilaol.com 

I further certify that on this date I have served the original and one copy of the foregoing 

COMPLAINANT'S OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS by U.S. 

Certified Mail- return receipt requested and facsimile, addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Fax: (202) 267-1293 

Dated: February 24, 2017 

/1 

~ ' ~I 

/~nt-· J /I I '. L'>-f/ z__~ P""L.c/~ Antonia Garcia, Program Analyst 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Lawndale, CA 

2
### §5402. Scope of authority

#### (a) General authorization

The President is authorized to conduct activities for any East European country that are similar to any activity authorized by this chapter to be conducted in Poland or Hungary (excluding those authorized by section 5412 of this title or the amendments made by sections 301 and 304) if such similar activities would effectively promote a transition to market-oriented democracy.

#### (b) Administration of justice programs

In order to strengthen the administration of justice in East European countries, the President may exercise the same authorities with respect to those countries as are available under section 2346c of this title, subject to the limitations and requirements of that section, other than subsection (c) and the last two sentences of subsection (e).

#### (c) "East European country" defined

For purposes of this chapter, the term "East European country" includes Albania, Bulgaria, the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, and states that were part of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

(Pub. L. 101–179, §3, as added Pub. L. 102–511, title IX, §903(a), Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3355.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 101–179, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1298, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5401 of this title and Tables.

Sections 301 and 304, referred to in subsec. (a), are sections 301 and 304 of Pub. L. 101–179, title III, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1311, 1312. Section 301 amended section 2462 of Title 19, Customs Duties. Section 304 enacted section 2185 of this title, amended section 2184 of this title, and enacted provisions set out as a note under section 2185 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PROFESSIONALS GROUP,
INC. AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED.
</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           751,669
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       4,326
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      405
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 777,562
<CASH>                                          13,509
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               4,695
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,271
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,105,178
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                655,541
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             98,000
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  27,424
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           10,094
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 17,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,267
<OTHER-SE>                                     208,585
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,105,178
<PREMIUMS>                                     136,605
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             30,108
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,588
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,014
<BENEFITS>                                     110,432
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            33,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,322
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,556
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.31
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 540,583
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            140,428
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (30,746)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              25,581
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                86,751
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                655,541
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
### §522. Transmission of information pertaining to implements of war, vessels, etc.

In carrying out transactions authorized by section 521 of this title, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary of the Navy are authorized, in their discretion and provided that it be not inconsistent with any defense requirements of the United States or of its possessions, to communicate or transmit to the government of any American republic or to any duly authorized person for the use of such government information pertaining to the arms, ammunition, or implements of war sold under the terms of that section or to any vessels of war constructed within the jurisdiction of any such government, and to export for the use of any such government coast defense and antiaircraft matériel and ammunition therefor, and vessels of war and their armament and equipment involving such information: Provided, That any information thus communicated or transmitted or involved in any such arms, ammunition, implements of war, or equipment when exported shall cease to be considered restricted after one year from the date that such communication or transmission has been authorized or such exportation made.

(June 15, 1940, ch. 365, §2, 54 Stat. 396; July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, §205(a), 61 Stat. 501.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Change of Name

Department of War designated Department of the Army and title of Secretary of War changed to Secretary of the Army by section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, ch. 343, title II, 61 Stat. 510. Section 205(a) of act July 26, 1947, was repealed by section 53 of act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 641. Section 1 of act Aug. 10, 1956, enacted "Title 10, Armed Forces" which in sections 3010 to 3013 continued Department of the Army under administrative supervision of Secretary of the Army.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Secretary of the Air Force

For transfer of certain procurement and related functions and property, insofar as they pertain to Air Force, from Secretary of the Army and Department of the Army to Secretary of the Air Force and Department of the Air Force, see Secretary of Defense Transfer Order Nos. 6 [§1(a)(41)], eff. Jan. 15, 1948, 39 [§2zz], May 18, 1949.
### §4012a. Foreign national employees separation pay

#### (a) Establishment

There is established in the Treasury of the United States a fund to provide separation pay for foreign national employees of agencies of the United States Government, other than the Department of Defense.

#### (b) Funding

There shall be deposited in such account—

(1) all amounts previously obligated for accrued separation pay of foreign national employees of such agencies of the United States Government; and

(2) amounts obligated for fiscal years after 1991 by such agencies for the current and future costs of separation pay of foreign national employees.

#### (c) Availability

Amounts shall be deposited in the fund annually and are authorized to be available until expended.

#### (d) Expenditures from fund

Amounts deposited in the fund shall be available for expenditure to make separation payments to foreign national employees in countries in which such pay is legally authorized.

(Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §151, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 672.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1992 and 1993, and not as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 129

 123

 126

 129

 131

 131

 129

 129

 130

 130

 131

 132

 132

 133

 133

 133

 132

 133

 137

 140

 144

 148

 148

 158

 164

 176

 171

 174

 175

 159

 156

 99

 103

 116

 122

 118

 122

 124

 124

 124

 126

 123

 126

 129

 127

 126

 123

 122

 122

 124

 122

 125

 126

 126

 123

 125

 128

 128

 129

 130

 131

 128

 119

 117

 123

 125

 126

 126

 126

 126

 127

 128

 128

 130

 131

 131

 130

 129

 128

 129

 130

 130

 131

 133

 134

 134

 138

 142

 142

 142

 144

 141

 138

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 3, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### The Alicia Realty Company, Respondent, v. John L. Miller, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §4081a. Exception for Government-financed air transportation; reducing hardship for transportation of domestic animals

#### (1) In general

Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (c) of section 40118 of title 49, the Department is authorized to pay for the transportation by a foreign air carrier of Department personnel and any in-cabin or accompanying checked baggage or cargo if—

(A) no air carrier holding a certificate under section 41102 of such title is willing and able to transport up to 3 domestic animals accompanying such Federal personnel; and

(B) the transportation is from a place—

(i) outside the United States to a place in the United States;

(ii) in the United States to a place outside the United States; or

(iii) outside the United States to another place outside the United States.

#### (2) Limitation

An amount paid pursuant to paragraph (1) for transportation by a foreign carrier may not be greater than the amount that would otherwise have been paid had the transportation been on an air carrier holding a certificate under section 41102 had that carrier been willing and able to provide such transportation. If the amount that would otherwise have been paid to such an air carrier is less than the cost of transportation on the applicable foreign carrier, the Department personnel may pay the difference of such amount.

#### (3) Domestic animal defined

In this subsection, the term "domestic animal" means a dog or a cat.

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. F, title LXII, §6224(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 979.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subsection, referred to in par. (3), means subsec. (a) of section 6224 of Pub. L. 118–31, which is classified to this section.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2023, and also as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, and not as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definition

For definition of "Department" as used in this section, see section 6002 of Pub. L. 118–31, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph R. Sawyer, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Stephen E. Anbinder, certify that: l.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K/A of The National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2005-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports); 2.          Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.          Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 4.          Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement included as an exhibit to this annual report, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and 5.          The Exchange Act periodic reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standard based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants that is included as an exhibit to this annual report.      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

U.S. Bank National Association, as Indenture Trustee

Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency


Date: September 29, 2005/s/ Stephen E. AnbinderStephen E. AnbinderPresidentNational Collegiate Funding LLC
Exhibit 99.4
Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions toCertificateholders as of December 31,2005
STRUCTURED ASSET SECURITIES CORPORATIONMORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATESSERIES 2005-GEL2
Original
Beginning
Ending
Class
Balance
Balance
Principal
Interest
Loss
Balance
A
152,044,000.00
152,044,000.00
47,335,495.43
3,378,818.27
0.00
104,708,504.57
M1
6,692,000.00
6,692,000.00
0.00
185,245.07
0.00
6,692,000.00
M2
5,748,000.00
5,748,000.00
0.00
170,111.52
0.00
5,748,000.00
M3
3,603,000.00
3,603,000.00
0.00
122,633.77
0.00
3,603,000.00
M4
1,372,000.00
1,372,000.00
0.00
52,323.37
0.00
1,372,000.00
B
1,716,000.00
1,716,000.00
0.00
71,305.35
0.00
1,716,000.00
P
100.00
100.00
0.00
226,846.64
0.00
100.00
X
433,214.36
433,114.36
0.00
1,582,497.07
0.00
1,109,271.34
R
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00