alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David LUGO-VALOIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41459.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided March 8, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Kathlyn Giannaula Snyder, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Philip G. Gallagher, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

David Lugo-Valois (Lugo) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry following deportation. Lugo argues that the district court committed reversible error under *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), by sentencing him pursuant to a mandatory application of the Sentencing Guidelines. The Government concedes that Lugo has preserved this issue for appeal. The Government, however, has not shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless. See *United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir.2005). Accordingly, Lugo’s sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded for resentencing.

He also argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Lugo’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Lugo contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi,*we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Lugo properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7533

MIKE BAILEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JASPER CLAY, JR., Vice Chairman; JOHN DOE, National Appeals Board, United States ParoleCommission; CAROL PAVILACK GETTY, Commissioner; G. MILLS, Examiner; R. WAGNER, Examiner; C. YOUNG, Examiner, North Central Region, United St ates Parole Commission; J. HAGEN, Probation Officer, District of South Dakota; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 1674-L) Submitted: March 19, 1996 Decided: March 29, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mike Bailey, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing this civil action without requiring service of process pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1985). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Bailey v. Clay , No. CA-95-1674-L (D. Md. Aug. 31, 1995). We note that because Appellant has alleged mere negligence on the part of the Defendants, he has not stated a claim under the Privacy Act. 5 U.S.C.A. § 552a(g) (West 1977 & Supp. 1995); see Edison v. Department of the Army , 672 F.2d 840, 842-46 (11th Cir. 1982). We deny Appellant's motions for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §4030. Suitability reviews for Foreign Service Institute instructors

The Secretary shall take reasonable steps to ensure that all instructors at the Foreign Service Institute, including direct hires and contractors, who provide language instruction are—

(1) subject to suitability reviews and background investigations; and

(2) subject to periodic background checks or reinvestigations to the extent consistent with Department and Executive policy for other Department personnel.

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. F, title LXI, §6116, Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 970.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of State Authorization Act of 2023, and also as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, and not as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of "Secretary" and "Department" as used in this section, see section 6002 of Pub. L. 118–31, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

EDWARD ECKER 

 v. 

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER 

CORPORATION A/K/A AMTRAK 

 v. 

CONTROLLED F.O.R.C.E., INC. 

PETITION OF: CONTROLLED 

F.O.R.C.E., INC 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 626 EAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of April, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED. 

Justices Donohue and Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision 

of this matter.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Graeme McNeill, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Wolf Resources, Inc for the year ended July 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Wolf Resources, Inc.

Date: November 13, 2008


/s/ Graeme McNeill
--------------------------------------
Graeme McNeill
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director
E0 ='A 7 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY f REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

JamesN. Goldstene Executive Officer California Air Resources Board 1001 

### I Street P. 0. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 958 12 Dear Mr. Goldstene: On September 10,2010,the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the SouthCoast Air Quality Management District CPV Sentinel Power Plant and found that it fulfills the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 

### 11O(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G Allen at (4 15) 947-4120. Sincere1 

### y, 

# &a- Deborah Jordan Director, Air Division
cc: Dr. Barry Wallerstein Executive Officer SouthCoast AQMD Mr. Richard Corey, Chief Stationary Source Division

Printed on Krryclrd Paper
### Purpose:To investigate the emissions (CO, HC, NOx, PM, N2O, CH4, CO2), J1939 broadcast signal, and mass fuel consumption of an SCR-equpped engine which will be used for Power Pack testing. (A) Obtain engine torque curve and record all engine specs (rated rpm/torque, displacement, model year, EGR type, etc.) (B) 28 steady-state modes and idle (C) Triplicate runs of both cold/hot FTP and WHTC transient cycles

-Run ULSD fuel (~10 ppm sulfur) -Take PM filters for transient cycle(s)

**Denormalization:**

Per Part 1065 (for HD GHG purposes) and Part 86 (for compliance and comparison purposes)

**Plan: Test Sequence:** 

a) Daily sequence (cold FTP - soak - hot transient cycles in triplicates [refer to c and d below]) b) Manually run 29 modes [Idle + 28 modes] and log data: emissions and fuel mass rate (including pertinent engine paramters shown) c) Transient Cycle FTP (in triplicates) (emissions and fuel mass rate) d) Transient Cycle WHTC (in triplicates) (emissions and fuel mass rate)

Day 1 run torque curve and then prep engine/ aftertreatement with an FTP 

### Day 2 Cold FTP-soak-hot FTP (triplicate runs) + steady-state modes, prep with FTP at end of day 

### Day 3Cold FTP-soak-hot FTP (triplicate runs) + finish steady-state modes



### Instrument:(1) INSITE for monitoring any non-proprietary signal across J1939

**Engine Parameters:** Speed (RPM) Torque Fuel Flow Rate (mass/time) A/F (if feasible)

**Emissions:**NOx

NMHC CO2 

### CO CH4 Smoke Fuel mass consumption and BSFC

### To investigate the emissions (CO, HC, NOx, PM, N2O, CH4, CO2), J1939 broadcast signal, and mass fuel consumption of an SCR-equpped engine which will be used for Power Pack testing. (A) Obtain engine torque curve and record all engine specs (rated rpm/torque, displacement, model year, EGR type, etc.)

Per Part 1065 (for HD GHG purposes) and Part 86 (for compliance and comparison purposes)

a) Daily sequence (cold FTP - soak - hot transient cycles in triplicates [refer to c and d below]) b) Manually run 29 modes [Idle + 28 modes] and log data: emissions and fuel mass rate (including pertinent engine paramters shown)

Cold FTP-soak-hot FTP (triplicate runs) + steady-state modes, prep with FTP at end of day

### To investigate the emissions (CO, HC, NOx, PM, N2O, CH4, CO2), J1939 broadcast signal, and mass fuel consumption of an SCR-equpped engine which will be used for Power Pack testing.Mode RPM N-m lb-ft (%) (%) (%) 1 Idle 0 0 2 A 25 25 3 A 50 50 4 A 75 75 5 A 100 100 6 B 25 25 7 B 50 50 8 B 75 75 9 B 100 100 10 C 25 25 11 C 50 50 12 C 75 75 13 C 100 100 14 A 12 12 15 B 12 12 16 C 12 12 17 1/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 25 25 18 1/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 50 50 19 1/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 75 75 20 1/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 100 100 21 2/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 20 20 22 2/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 40 40 23 2/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 60 60 24 2/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 80 80 25 2/3 * (Idle - A) + idle 100 100 26 1/2 * (Vmax - C) + Cspeed 25 25 271/2 * (Vmax - C) + Cspeed + Cspeed 50 50 28 1/2 * (Vmax - C) + Cspeed 75 75 29 1/2 * (Vmax - C) + Cspeed 100 100
### §5473. Report on environmental problems in Poland and Hungary

The first report submitted pursuant to section 5474 of this title shall include the following:

#### (1) Assessment of problems

An overall assessment of the environmental problems facing Poland and Hungary, including—

(A) a relative ranking of the severity of the problems and their effects on both human health and the general environment;

(B) a listing of the geographical areas of each country that have suffered the heaviest environmental damage, and a description of the source and scope of the damage; and

(C) an assessment of the environmental performance of leading industrial polluters in those countries and the expected effect on pollution levels of industrial modernization.

#### (2) Priorities and costs for action

An analysis of the priorities that Poland and Hungary should each assign in addressing its environmental problems, and an estimate of the capital and human resources required to undertake a comprehensive program of environmental protection in that country.

#### (3) Role of United States and multilateral assistance

A statement of strategy for United States assistance for the next 5 years to address environmental problems in Poland and Hungary, including—

(A) recommendations for appropriate levels and forms of bilateral financial and technical assistance;

(B) recommendations concerning United States participation in cooperative multilateral undertakings;

(C) an assessment of the feasibility of debt-for-nature swaps as a technique of environmental protection in each country; and

(D) recommendations for minimizing further environmental damage to Krakow, and for the protection and restoration of historic sites in that city.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title VII, §703, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1321.)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4458 

To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Unit M13. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2016 

Mr. SANFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System Unit M13. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map included in the set of 

6 maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ re7 ferred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 

8 Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to Unit M13 in 

9 South Carolina is hereby replaced by another map relating 

10 to the same unit entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4458 IH

1 Resources System Corrected Unit M13’’ and dated 

2 lllll. 

3 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

4 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

5 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

6 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

7 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


Emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §3925. Compatibility between Foreign Service and other Government personnel systems

The Service shall be administered to the extent practicable in conformity with general policies and regulations of the Government. The Secretary shall consult with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the heads of such other agencies as the President shall determine, in order to assure compatibility of the Foreign Service personnel system with other Government personnel systems to the extent practicable.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §205, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2079.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions of President under this section delegated to Secretary of State, see section 1 of Ex. Ord. No. 12293, Feb. 23, 1981, 46 F.R. 13969, set out as a note under section 3901 of this title.

#### Consultation With Other Federal Departments and Agencies

For authority for the Secretary of State to consult with the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Commerce, the Director of the United States Information Agency, the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development, the Director of the Office of Personnel Management, and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to ensure compatibility between the Foreign Service personnel system and other government personnel systems, see section 2 of Ex. Ord. No. 12293, Feb. 23, 1981, 46 F.R. 13969, as amended, set out as note under section 3901 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY

 4,393

 4,467

 4,389

 3,877

 4,036

 4,172

 3,998

 4,768

 4,639

 4,573

 5,173

 5,302

 5,447

 4,522

 4,465

 4,346

 4,335

 4,329

 4,175

 4,600

 3,905

 3,764

 4,015

 4,456

 3,741

 4,063

 4,289

 2,748

 6,959

 88,940

 88,667

 88,477

 88,223

 87,495

 86,954

 86,570

 86,039

 86,267

 86,361

 86,387

 86,982

 87,670

 88,461

 88,334

 88,159

 87,880

 87,604

 87,336

 86,936

 86,959

 86,321

 85,581

 85,116

 85,093

 84,392

 84,033

 83,906

 82,321

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 591,360

 606,144

 620,928

 635,712

 650,496

 665,280

 680,064

 694,848

 709,632

 724,416

 739,200

 753,984

 768,768

 783,552

 798,336

 813,120

 827,904

 842,688

 857,472

 872,256

 887,040

 901,824

 916,608

 931,392

 946,176

 960,960

 975,744

 990,528

 1,005,312

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2012 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: August 23, 2012

 93,333

 93,134

 92,866

 92,100

 91,531

 91,126

 90,568

 90,807

 90,906

 90,934

 91,560

 92,284

 93,117

 92,983

 92,799

 92,505

 92,215

 91,933

 91,511

 91,536

 90,864

 90,085

 89,596

 89,572

 88,834

 88,455

 88,322

 86,654

 89,280

 708,640

 693,856

 679,072

 664,288

 649,504

 634,720

 619,936

 605,152

 590,368

 575,584

 560,800

 546,016

 531,232

 516,448

 501,664

 486,880

 472,096

 457,312

 442,528

 427,744

 412,960

 398,176

 383,392

 368,608

 353,824

 339,040

 324,256

 309,472

 294,688

 3,843,000

 3,858,000

 3,873,000

 3,888,000

 3,902,000

 3,917,000

 3,932,000

 3,947,000

 3,962,000

 3,976,000

 3,991,000

 4,006,000

 4,021,000

 4,036,000

 4,050,000

 4,065,000

 4,080,000

 4,095,000

 4,109,000

 4,124,000

 4,139,000

 4,154,000

 4,169,000

 4,183,000

 4,198,000

 4,213,000

 4,228,000

 4,243,000

 4,257,000

 1.4080

 1.4432

 1.4784

 1.5136

 1.5488

 1.5840

 1.6192

 1.6544

 1.6896

 1.7248

 1.7600

 1.7952

 1.8304

 1.8656

 1.9008

 1.9360

 1.9712

 2.0064

 2.0416

 2.0768

 2.1120

 2.1472

 2.1824

 2.2176

 2.2528

 2.2880

 2.3232

 2.3584

 2.3936

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 93,621
Exhibit 32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  November 12, 2010

/s/ Ann F. Massey
Name:  Ann F. Massey
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 723.10

 721.56

 722.18

 722.76

 723.30

 723.82

 724.32

 724.79

 725.24

 725.67

 726.10

 726.53

 726.94

 721.52

 728.33

 723.54

 720.20

 720.40

 721.96

 722.37

 723.08

 725.69

 720.52

 722.83

 724.83

 726.48

 720.06

 721.61

 1,300

 1,243

 1,266

 1,287

 1,307

 1,327

 1,346

 1,365

 1,382

 1,399

 1,416

 1,433

 1,450

 1,241

 1,507

 1,317

 1,193

 1,200

 1,258

 1,273

 1,299

 1,400

 1,205

 1,290

 1,366

 1,431

 1,188

 1,245

STORAGE

+24

-57

+23

+21

+20

+20

+19

+19

+17

+17

+17

+17

+17

-209

+266

-190

-124

+7

+58

+15

+26

+101

-195

+85

+76

+65

-243

+57

CHANGE

15

10

15

14

13

13

13

13

12

12

12

12

12

45

136

100

56

55

66

50

52

53

27

46

41

36

12

31

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 3

 39

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 3

 150

 2

 196

 119

 51

 37

 42

 39

 2

 125

 3

 3

 3

 135

 2

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2011 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 1, 2011

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -31 972 0 984

ACRE-FEET -31 1,928 0 1,952

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,952

 1,952

 1,276

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### §§ 655.435-655.439 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 120

 111

 118

 108

 118

 108

 107

 103

 105

 104

 105

 101

 99

 103

 104

 101

 100

 102

 101

 100

 96

 100

 91

 101

 87

 101

 80

 75

 94

 89

 104

 102

 102

 99

 100

 91

 91

 90

 91

 90

 87

 86

 85

 86

 87

 86

 84

 85

 88

 85

 85

 83

 84

 85

 84

 80

 71

 72

 73

 76

 110

 106

 109

 103

 108

 98

 96

 93

 95

 94

 92

 90

 89

 92

 93

 89

 89

 90

 93

 90

 88

 89

 87

 91

 85

 91

 74

 74

 79

 83

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 2, 2010

HIGH LOW MEAN

 74.2

 74.6

 76.5

 77.7

 78.6

 78.0

 76.8

 75.6

 74.3

 72.6

 72.4

 73.5

 75.4

 76.7

 75.7

 74.1

 74.1

 73.7

 72.7

 72.9

 73.8

 75.7

 78.0

 77.2

 76.3

 76.0

 73.5

 74.1

 74.2

 76.7

 68.4

 68.7

 70.5

 72.1

 72.9

 73.2

 71.8

 71.0

 69.7

 67.9

 67.0

 67.6

 69.5

 71.0

 70.6

 69.3

 68.5

 68.5

 67.4

 67.0

 68.5

 68.9

 71.2

 71.9

 70.5

 71.1

 69.7

 69.9

 69.9

 70.7

 70.8

 71.4

 73.1

 74.4

 75.5

 75.4

 74.2

 73.1

 71.7

 70.1

 69.7

 70.4

 72.2

 73.6

 73.0

 71.6

 71.1

 70.9

 69.9

 69.8

 70.8

 71.9

 74.2

 74.2

 73.2

 73.5

 71.9

 72.0

 72.0

 73.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.1

 8.1

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 8.0

 8.1

 8.4

 8.6

 8.6

 8.5

 8.3

 8.2

 8.1

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.6

 8.5

 8.5

 8.2

 8.1

 8.3

 8.2

 8.6

 8.5

 8.5

 8.0

 7.4

 7.5

 7.4

 7.2

 7.1

 7.1

 7.2

 7.3

 7.5

 7.7

 7.9

 7.8

 7.6

 7.5

 7.4

 7.5

 7.7

 7.6

 7.7

 7.9

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.5

 7.5

 7.3

 7.8

 8.0

 7.8

 7.5

 7.7

 7.7

 7.6

 7.5

 7.4

 7.4

 7.5

 7.7

 7.9

 8.1

 8.2

 8.1

 7.9

 7.8

 7.7

 7.8

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.1

 8.0

 7.9

 7.8

 7.9

 7.8

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 7.7

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM