alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 11:48 AM

To: cwhiteman@icac.com

Cc: Laney, Michael N.

Subject:Portland Cement NESHAP and NSPS

Dear Chad:

I think a covered some of the areas of specific EPA concern about control

performance when I did the presentation on the proposed Portland Cement

NESHAP. However, I wanted to add some additional information, share some

areas of additional concerns for both the NESHAP and NSPS, and ask for some

contact information.

1. Do you have some contacts for companies that manufacture and install total

hydrocarbon monitors and VOC monitors?

2. I heard somewhere that ICAC was preparing or had prepared a white paper on

SNCR vs. SCR for NOx control. Is that correct, and if so could I get a copy?

3. I had one conversation with a wet scrubber vendor on the use of water

scrubbers vs. caustic scrubbers for HCl control. Based on that conversation,

it would appear that to get the HCl emission numbers we are proposing, you

would need caustic and potentially to use a packed bed rather than a spray

tower scrubber. I hope that while you and/or your members are preparing your

comments you are able to thoroughly address this issue.

4. We did not propose that kilns that use wet scrubbers for HCl control in

the NESHAP monitor for HCl. However, scrubber parameter monitoring, or

monitoring SO2 as a surrogate, would probably be necessary. We are hoping

your comments will address the issue of what operating parameters do you need

to monitor when using a wet scrubber for HCl control and/or

SO2 control to insure the device is performing properly. My guess would be

liquid flow rate, pH, and solids content of the scrubber liquid.

5. Currently all cement kilns that have wet scrubbers produce gypsum

that is fed to the finish mill with the clinker to produce cement. In

all of these cases, all of the gypsum produced by the scrubber can be used in

the grinding process. But what about the situation where a facility has to

install wet scrubber for HCl control, but they have low

SO2 emissions. In that case they would not produce as much gypsum. Does this

present a problem? Or would the facility simply have less gypsum available to

add to the finish mill.

6. I was told that when an ESP is used for particulate matter control, some

facilities add ammonia as a conditioning agent. Is this ever done in the

cement industry? If so, does anyone know where?Please contact me if you have questions.

Keith W. Barnett

USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

Mail Code D243

‐ 02

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

919

‐ 541

‐ 5605

barnett.keith@epa.gov
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,736-01 & -02
EX P ARTE MATTHEW MASON MCK NIG HT, App licant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 30056A & 30056B IN THE 3 JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT R D F ROM AND ERSON COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code o f C ri m i n al Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App
. 1 9 6 7 ). Applicant was convicted of two counts of possession of a controlled subs t an ce with intent to deliver and sentenc ed to thirty year s’ imprisonment f

or count one and twenty year s’ imprisonment f or count two. The Twelfth Court of Appea ls aff

irmed Applicant’s convictions in McKnight v. State , No. 12-11-00365 -C R (Tex
. App.—Tyler July

31, 2013)(not designated f or publication). Applicant’s claim conce rning pre- sentenc e jail time cre dit is dismiss ed. Ex parte Florence ,2

319 S.W .3d 695 (Te x . C ri m . Ap p . 2010); Ex parte Y barra , 149 S.W .3d 147 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). Ba sed on this Court’s independe nt revie w of the rec ord, we find that Applicant’s rema ining claims are without merit. There fore , we de ny relief
. Filed: May

13, 2015 Do not publish
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 454.88

 453.77

 452.46

 451.15

 449.79

 448.68

 447.61

 446.75

 445.77

 445.04

 444.61

 443.77

 443.15

 442.73

 442.93

 442.26

 441.73

 441.33

 441.05

 440.59

 440.27

 439.99

 439.46

 439.13

 438.47

 437.92

 437.06

 436.27

 436.16

 435.64

 435.25

 1,021,055

 1,009,888

 996,763

 983,694

 970,188

 959,210

 948,668

 940,223

 930,631

 923,507

 919,320

 911,158

 905,149

 901,087

 903,021

 896,548

 891,439

 887,589

 884,898

 880,483

 877,415

 874,735

 869,668

 866,518

 860,230

 855,003

 846,850

 839,384

 838,346

 833,446

 829,778

STORAGE

-12,016

-11,167

-13,125

-13,069

-13,506

-10,978

-10,542

-8,445

-9,592

-7,124

-4,187

-8,162

-6,009

-4,062

+1,934

-6,473

-5,109

-3,850

-2,691

-4,415

-3,068

-2,680

-5,067

-3,150

-6,288

-5,227

-8,153

-7,466

-1,038

-4,900

-3,668

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,864

532

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

358

PUMPING

 5,989

 5,360

 6,373

 6,123

 6,403

 5,172

 5,136

 3,945

 4,677

 3,145

 1,500

 3,727

 2,669

 1,623

 0

 3,723

 2,077

 1,483

 1,039

 1,779

 1,039

 1,044

 2,230

 1,187

 2,811

 2,293

 3,977

 3,439

 0

 2,133

 1,980

POWER

 360

 398

 385

 339

 387

 393

 377

 367

 383

 381

 386

 377

 454

 374

 358

 365

 363

 352

 351

 349

 344

 337

 341

 463

 89

 324

 320

 316

 310

 306

 260

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+292

+129

+141

-128

-19

+30

+198

+54

+223

-66

-225

-11

+94

-51

-531

+292

-136

-106

+33

-97

-164

+30

+17

+62

-270

-18

+186

-9

-213

-32

+32

OR

 228

 172

 191

 274

 177

 230

 163

 210

 186

 192

 164

 160

 141

 163

 172

 168

 134

 162

 174

 180

 158

 140

 160

 216

 190

 193

 174

 220

 229

 214

 140

C.F.S.

 .70

 .53

 .59

 .85

 .55

 .72

 .51

 .66

 .59

 .61

 .52

 .51

 .45

 .52

 .55

 .54

 .43

 .52

 .56

 .58

 .51

 .45

 .52

 .70

 .62

 .63

 .57

 .72

 .75

 .70

 .46

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR August 17, 2001

DAILY OPERATIONS

JULY 2001 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -203,293 2,754 94,076 10,909 0 -263 5,675 18.12 .00

ACRE-FEET -203,293 5,463 186,600 21,638 0 -522 11,256

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 186,600

PACHECO TUNNEL 21,638 TOTAL 208,238

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2001 TO DATE = .00

 1,033,071

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
SERVED: OCTOBER31, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF JETBLUEAIRWAYS CORPORATION DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0813 (Civil Penalty Action) NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING .)

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012EA150022) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding thisproceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment
- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1



### Michael Carbone, Respondent's Counsel 

### JetBlue
- Associate General Counsel 27-01 Queens PlazaNorth
, .Long Island City, NY 11101 TEL: 718-709-2276 ONE COPY



### Christian Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofRegional Counsel, Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3273 FAX: 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0813 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
§ 670.800 How do Job Corps centers and service providers become involved in their local communities? ( a ) Job Corps representatives serve on Youth Councils operating under applicable Local Boards wherever geographically feasible.
( b ) Each Job Corps center must have a Business and Community Liaison designated by the director of the center to establish relationships with local and distant employers, applicable One-Stop centers and local boards, and members of the community according to procedures established by the Secretary. (WIA sec. 153(a).)
( c ) Each Job Corps center must implement an active community relations program.
( d ) Each Job Corps center must establish an industry advisory council, according to procedures established by the Secretary. The industry advisory council must include: ( 1 ) Distant and local employers;
( 2 ) Representatives of labor organizations (where present) and employees; and
( 3 ) Job Corps students and graduates.
( e ) A majority of the council members must be local and distant business owners, chief executives or chief operating officers of nongovernmental employers or other private sector employers, who have substantial management, hiring or policy responsibility and who represent businesses with employment opportunities in the local area and the areas to which students will return.
( f ) The council must work with Local Boards and must review labor market information to provide recommendations to the Secretary regarding the center's vocational training offerings, including identification of emerging occupations suitable for training. (WIA sec.154(b)(1).)
( g ) Job Corps is identified as a required One-Stop partner. Wherever practicable, Job Corps centers and operational support contractors must establish cooperative relationships and partnerships with One-Stop centers and other One-Stop partners, Local Boards, and other programs for youth.
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                            REPORT OF FOREIGN ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                           For the month of June 2003

                         Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                            Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron
                            456 (1038) Buenos Aires,
                                    Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                      Form 20-F  X           Form 40-F
                                ---                    ---

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                             Yes              No  X
                                 ---             ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82- ________
<PAGE>

                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

Month Filed                    Event and Summary                     Exhibit No.

 June 2003      Press release, dated June 3, 2003, regarding the       99.1
                Registrant's reporting of its  financial results
                for its first quarter ended March 31, 2003.
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                       GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.
                                       (Registrant)

Date:  June 6, 2003                    By: /s/ Antonio Garces
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Name:   Antonio Garces
                                          Title:  Chief Executive Officer
### §286e–1e. Equivalent increase in quota of United States

The United States Governor of the Fund is authorized to consent to an increase in the quota of the United States in the Fund equivalent to 1,705 million Special Drawing Rights.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §25, as added Pub. L. 94–564, §1, Oct. 19, 1976, 90 Stat. 2660.)
Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Hans Ephraimson, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of DB Commodity Index Tracking
Master Fund (the Master Fund), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Master Funds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Master Fund.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 18, 2010 |  | /s/ Hans Ephraimson    
|                     |  | Hans Ephraimson        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
### §3928. Director General of Foreign Service

The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a Director General of the Foreign Service, who shall be a current or former career member of the Foreign Service. The Director General should assist the Secretary of State in the management of the Service and perform such functions as the Secretary of State may prescribe.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §208, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2080; Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §163, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 411.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–236 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There shall be a Director General of the Foreign Service, who shall be appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, from among the career members of the Senior Foreign Service. The Director General shall assist the Secretary of State in the management of the Service and shall perform such functions as the Secretary of State may prescribe."
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1455 The effect of a hearing decision. The decision of the administrative law judge is binding on all parties to the hearing unless— ( a ) You or another party request a review of the decision by the Appeals Council within the stated time period, and the Appeals Council reviews your case;
( b ) You or another party requests a review of the decision by the Appeals Council within the stated time period, the Appeals Council denies your request for review, and you seek judicial review of your case by filing an action in a Federal district court;
( c ) The Appeals Council decides on its own motion to review the decision under the procedures in § 416.1469;
( d ) The decision is revised by an administrative law judge or the Appeals Council under the procedures explained in § 416.1487;
( e ) The expedited appeals process is used;
( f ) The decision is a recommended decision directed to the Appeals Council; or
( g ) In a case remanded by a Federal court, the Appeals Council assumes jurisdiction under the procedures in § 416.1484.
[45 FR 52096, Aug. 5, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 308, Jan. 3, 1986; 54 FR 37793, Sept. 13, 1989; 85 FR 73159, Nov. 16, 2020]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 961.79

 961.58

 961.30

 961.13

 960.93

 960.72

 960.51

 960.38

 960.24

 960.03

 959.84

 959.76

 959.81

 959.69

 959.49

 959.29

 959.10

 959.28

 959.28

 959.30

 959.34

 959.44

 959.51

 959.34

 959.22

 959.07

 958.99

 958.90

 958.74

 958.61

 2,078.2

 2,074.5

 2,069.6

 2,066.6

 2,063.1

 2,059.4

 2,055.7

 2,053.5

 2,051.0

 2,047.4

 2,044.0

 2,042.6

 2,043.5

 2,041.4

 2,037.9

 2,034.4

 2,031.1

 2,034.3

 2,034.3

 2,034.6

 2,035.3

 2,037.1

 2,038.3

 2,035.3

 2,033.2

 2,030.6

 2,029.2

 2,027.6

 2,024.9

 2,022.6

STORAGE

-3.7

-3.7

-4.9

-3.0

-3.5

-3.7

-3.7

-2.3

-2.4

-3.7

-3.3

-1.4

+0.9

-2.1

-3.5

-3.5

-3.3

+3.1

+0.0

+0.3

+0.7

+1.7

+1.2

-3.0

-2.1

-2.6

-1.4

-1.6

-2.8

-2.3

CHANGE

 2,460

 2,998

 2,054

 3,203

 2,653

 2,142

 2,321

 3,785

 3,845

 3,118

 3,016

 3,786

 4,542

 3,376

 2,663

 3,011

 3,620

 5,658

 4,128

 4,192

 3,942

 4,751

 4,249

 2,335

 2,795

 2,574

 3,413

 2,619

 2,267

 2,834

INFLOW

 4,246

 4,816

 4,455

 4,646

 4,374

 3,913

 4,138

 4,867

 5,010

 4,961

 4,621

 4,485

 4,102

 4,376

 4,412

 4,766

 5,271

 4,055

 4,123

 4,006

 3,513

 3,799

 3,628

 3,794

 3,814

 3,868

 4,060

 3,350

 3,651

 3,910

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 73

 41

 78

 62

 46

 77

 31

 62

 67

 5

 67

 5

 0

 56

 10

 5

 20

 20

 5

 10

 77

 72

 5

 36

 36

 26

 56

 56

 15

 61

C.F.S.

 .14

 .08

 .15

 .12

 .09

 .15

 .06

 .12

 .13

 .01

 .13

 .01

 .00

 .11

 .02

 .01

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .02

 .15

 .14

 .01

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .11

 .11

 .03

 .12

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .68

 .05

 .01

 .00

 1.37

 .03

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2020 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 7, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -59.6 98,350 127,030 0 0 1,180 2.30 2.30

ACRE-FEET -59,600 195,077 251,964 0 0 2,341

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 251,964

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 251,964

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.30

JULY 1, 2020 2.53

 2,081.8

Table 3

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 2.50
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew J. Ashton, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



Date:  April 14, 2009

/s/ Andrew J. Ashton

Andrew J. Ashton

Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
§ 702.222 Claims; exceptions to time limitations. ( a ) Where a person entitled to compensation under the Act is mentally incompetent or a minor, the time limitation provision of § 702.221 shall not apply to a mentally incompetent person so long as such person has no guardian or other authorized representative, but § 702.221 shall be applicable from the date of appointment of such guardian or other representative. In the case of minor who has no guardian before he or she becomes of age, time begins to run from the date he or she becomes of age.
( b ) Where a person brings a suit at law or in admiralty to recover damages in respect of an injury or death, or files a claim under a State workers' compensation act because such person is excluded from this Act's coverage by reason of section 2(3) or 3(d) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 902(3) or 903(d)), and recovery is denied because the person was an employee and defendant was an employer within the meaning of the Act, and such employer had secured compensation to such employee under the Act, the time limitation in § 702.221 shall not begin to run until the date of termination of such suit or proceeding.
( c ) Notwithstanding the provisions in paragraph (a) of this section, where the claim is one based on disability or death due to an occupational disease which does not immediately result in death or disability, it must be filed within two years after the employee or claimant becomes aware, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence or by reason of medical advice, should have been aware of the relationship between the employment, the disease and the death or disability, or within one year of the date of last payment of compensation, whichever is later. For purposes of occupational disease, therefore, the time limitation for filing a claim does not begin to run until the employee is disabled, or in the case of a retired employee, where a permanent impairment exists.
( d ) The time limitations set forth above do not apply to claims filed under section 49 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. 949.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1215-0160) [50 FR 398, Jan. 3, 1985]