[Cite as State v. Snelling , 2013-Ohio-2633.]

COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee

-vsREGINALD SNELLING Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. William B. Hoffman, P.J. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin, J. Case No. 12CA79

O P I N I O N

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 10-CR-43 D

JUDGMENT: Affirmed

DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: June 21, 2013

APPEARANCES:

For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant

JAMES J. MAYER, JR. JAMES L. BLUNT, II PROSECUTING ATTORNEY 445 West Longview Avenue RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO Mansfield, Ohio 44903 BY: JILL M. COCHRAN Assistant Richland County Prosecutor 38 South Park Street Mansfield, Ohio 44902Richland County, Case No. 12CA79 2

Hoffman, P.J.

{¶1} Defendant-appellant Reginald Snelling appeals his sentence entered by the Richland County Court of Common Pleas. Plaintiff-appellee is the state of Ohio. STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1 {¶2} On June 8, 2010, Appellant was found guilty by a jury of abduction, failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer and assault on a police officer. Via Sentencing Entry of June 15, 2010, Appellant was sentenced to seven years in prison and a mandatory three year term of post-release control. {¶3} On June 14, 2010, Appellant filed a direct appeal from his conviction with this Court in State v. Snelling , Fifth Dist. Case No. 10-CA-94. This Court affirmed Appellant’s conviction via Judgment Entry of June 22, 2011. See, State v. Snelling , 5th Dist. No. 10-CA-94, 2011-Ohio-3222. {¶4} On October 11, 2011, Appellant filed a pro se motion to vacate his sentence and for appointment of counsel. Via Judgment Entry of December 8, 2011, the trial court overruled Appellant’s motion. {¶5} On April 9, 2012, Appellant filed a pro se motion for sentencing. His motion was denied via Judgment Entry filed August 9, 2012. {¶6} It is from that entry, Appellant prosecutes this appeal, assigning as error: {¶7} “I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED BY FAILING TO ORALLY PRONOUNCE NOTIFICATION OF THE IMPOSITION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL AND THE

1 A rendition of the underlying facts is unnecessary for our resolution of the within appeal.Richland County, Case No. 12CA79 3

CONSEQUENCES OF A VIOLATION OF POST RELEASE CONTROL; THEREBY RENDERING THE SENTENCING VOID.” {¶8} In the sole assigned error, Appellant maintains the trial court erred during his sentencing in failing to orally pronounce the time period of post-release control and the consequences of violation as statutorily mandated by R.C. 2943.032. Appellant

maintains his sentence is therefore void. {¶9} R.C. 2943.032 reads, {¶10} “Prior to accepting a guilty plea or a plea of no contest to an indictment, information, or complaint that charges a felony, the court shall inform the defendant personally that, if the defendant pleads guilty or no contest to the felony so charged or any other felony, if the court imposes a prison term upon the defendant for the felony, and if the offender violates the conditions of a post-release control sanction imposed by the parole board upon the completion of the stated prison term, the parole board may impose upon the offender a residential sanction that includes a new prison term of up to

nine months.” {¶11} The statute pertains to the trial court’s acceptance of a guilty plea or of a plea of no contest. As set forth in the Statement of the Case, supra , Appellant was convicted of the charges following a jury trial. Therefore, Appellant’s reliance on R.C. 2943.032 is misplaced. For the same result see, State v. Reid , 2nd Dist. No. 24841, 2012-Ohio-2666 and State v. Panza, 8th Dist. No. 841777, 2005-Ohio-94. {¶12} The sole assignment of error is overruled.Richland County, Case No. 12CA79 4

{¶13} Appellant’s sentence in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas is

affirmed. By: Hoffman, P.J. Delaney, J. and Baldwin, J. concur s/ William B. Hoffman _________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN

s/ Patricia A. Delaney _________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

s/ Craig R. Baldwin ___________________ HON. CRAIG R. BALDWINRichland County, Case No. 12CA79 5

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-Appellee : : -vs- : JUDGMENT ENTRY : REGINALD SNELLING : : Defendant-Appellant : Case No. 12CA79

For the reason stated in our accompanying Opinion, Appellant’s sentence in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Costs to Appellant.

s/ William B. Hoffman _________________ HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN

s/ Patricia A. Delaney _________________ HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY

s/ Craig R. Baldwin ___________________ HON. CRAIG R. BALDWIN