alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>				       EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS


I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluations; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and




<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:  August 14, 2003     /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman
		Jeffrey A. Rothman
	President,
	Demeter Management Corporation,
	general partner of the registrant
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Raul GARCIA-SOLIS, Defendant-Appellant, *353UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raul Carlos Garcia-Solis, also known as Raul Carlos Villasi, also known as Carlos Rual Solis-Garcia, also known as Candelario Trujeque-Novelo, also known as Carlos Raul Garcia-Solis, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 05-50724, 05-50750.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 24, 2006.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for United States of America.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Carlos Raul Garcia-Solis.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Carlos Raul Garcia-Solis raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §262p–12. Cancellation of Haiti's debts to international financial institutions

#### (a) In general

The Secretary of the Treasury should direct the United States Executive Director at the International Monetary Fund, the International Development Association, the Inter-American Development Bank, the International Fund for Agricultural Development, and other multilateral development institutions (as defined in section 262r(c)(3) of this title) to use the voice, vote and influence of the United States at each such institution to seek to achieve—

(1) the immediate and complete cancellation of any and all remaining debts owed by Haiti to such institutions;

(2) the suspension of Haiti's debt service payments to such institutions until such time as the debts are canceled completely; and

(3) the provision, before February 1, 2015, of emergency, humanitarian and reconstruction assistance from such institutions to Haiti in the form of grants or other assistance such that Haiti does not accumulate debt.

#### (b) Use of certain funds for assistance to Haiti

The Secretary of the Treasury should instruct the United States Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund to advocate the use of some of the realized windfall profits that exceed the required contribution to the Poverty Reduction and Growth Trust (as referenced in the IMF Reforms Financial Facilities for Low-Income Countries Public Information Notice (PIN) No. 09/94) from the ongoing sale of 12,965,649 ounces of gold acquired since the second Amendment of the Fund's Article of Agreement, to provide debt stock relief and debt service relief for Haiti and, before February 1, 2015, to provide grants for Haiti.

#### (c) Securing other relief for Haiti

The Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of State should use all appropriate diplomatic influence to secure cancellation of any and all remaining bilateral, multilateral and private creditor debt owed by Haiti.

(Pub. L. 95–118, title XVI, §1628, as added Pub. L. 111–158, §2, Apr. 26, 2010, 124 Stat. 1121.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 262p–5 of this title apply to this section.
#### John J. Darraugh et al., as Stockholders of Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc., Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of Stockholders Similarly Situated, Respondents, and Charles A. Crownshield et al., Interveners, Respondents, v. International Paper Company, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00106-CV

PETER G. MILNE, P.C., PETER G. MILNE, 

INDIVIDUALLY, AND HEALY, MILNE & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Appellants

V.

VAL RYAN AND JOY RYAN, Appellees

On Appeal from the 4th District Court

Rusk County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-243

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that certain of the documents 

collectively marked as Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 11contain “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined 

in Rule 9.9 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9(a). Sensitive data 

includes “a bank account number, credit card number, or other financial account number.” TEX.

R. APP. P. 9.9(a)(2). Certain of the documents included in Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 1 contain bank 

account numbers. Rule 9.9(b) states, “Unless the inclusion of sensitive data is specifically required 

by a statute, court rule, or administrative regulation, an electronic or paper document containing 

sensitive data may not be filed with a court unless the sensitive data is redacted.” TEX. R. APP. P. 

9.9(b).

Because we are aware of no statute, court rule, or administrative regulation requiring 

inclusion of these bank account numbers in this record and because the reporter’s record failed to 

protect this sensitive data through redaction, we order the Clerk of this Court, or her appointee, 

pursuant to the inherent power of this Court, to seal the volume of the reporter’s record containing 

Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 1.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 22, 2015

 

1Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 1 contains 2,081 pages and was filed as a separate volume of the reporter’s record.
### §6914. Votes of the Commission

Decisions of the Commission, including adoption of reports and recommendations to the executive branch or to the Congress, shall be made by a majority vote of the members of the Commission present and voting. Two-thirds of the Members 1 of the Commission shall constitute a quorum for purposes of conducting business.

(Pub. L. 106–286, div. B, title III, §304, Oct. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 899.)

1 So in original. Probably should not be capitalized.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-95,232-01

EX PARTE ANDREUS GIOVAN BARKLEY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. DC30-CR2021-0739 IN THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WICHITA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Applicant was convicted of Assault Family/Household Member with Previous Conviction

and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment as a habitual felon. The Second Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Barkley v. State, No. 02-22-00081-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 16,

2023) (not designated for publication). Applicant, through habeas counsel, filed this application for

a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. 

SeeTEX.CODECRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Trial counsel, appellate counsel, and habeas counsel are all

the same lawyer. 

Applicant contends that, through no fault of his own, he was denied his right to pursue in this

Court a petition for discretionary review of the appellate decision affirming his conviction. He asks
2

for a late PDR. This Court has made an independent review of the record, and it supports

Applicant’s claim and request for a late PDR. 

Relief is granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow,

180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for

discretionary review of the judgment of the Second Court of Appeals in cause number 02-22-00081-

CR. Should Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionary review, he must file it with this

Court within thirty days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: NOVEMBER 22, 2023

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Acorn Holding Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30,  2002 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Larry  V.
Unterbrink,  Treasurer  (Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer)  of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (3)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (4)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/ Larry V. Unterbrink
-------------------------------------
Larry V. Unterbrink
Treasurer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
August 14, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 193

 214

 348

 256

 191

 185

 219

 187

 172

 167

 166

 168

 182

 180

 176

 166

 167

 171

 180

 200

 236

 1,619

 3,218

 3,224

 3,109

 2,980

 2,959

 1,278

 188

 185

 177

 178

 173

 171

 171

 163

 157

 156

 153

 151

 156

 156

 158

 159

 161

 162

 165

 159

 179

 194

 202

 233

 271

 277

 288

 324

 190

 190

 221

 198

 183

 177

 183

 176

 167

 162

 161

 159

 164

 162

 163

 162

 163

 165

 170

 176

 192

 364

 614

 686

 739

 711

 888

 665

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2006 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 7, 2006

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RY. CO., Respondent, v. WIENAND, Co. Treasurer, et al, Appellants. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RY. CO., Respondent, v. WIENAND, Co. Treasurer, et al, Appellants.

(238 N. W. 304.)

(File Nos. 7132, 7149.

Opinion filed October 19, 1931.)

*Caldmell & Burns,*of Sioux Falls, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

*H. Van Ruschen,*of Salem, for Impleaded Defendant and Appellant.

*R. M. Sheild,*of Salem, for Principal Defendants and Appellants.

PER CURIAM.

This action was -commenced to recover taxes paid under protest by the defendant, and was by agreement not determined until after the decision by this court of the case of Simmons v. Ericson, 54 S. D. 429, 223 N. W. 342. After the decision in that case, the trial court upon stipulated facts made conclusions of law and entered judgment against the defendants. *120The defendants have appealed. The contentions of the defendant upon this appeal are without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.

POLLEY, P. J, and' CAMPBELL, ROBERTS, WARREN, and RUDOLPH, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.54

 130.40

 130.25

 130.32

 130.38

 130.46

 130.43

 130.22

 130.43

 130.64

 130.63

 130.32

 130.31

 130.36

 130.33

 130.35

 130.27

 130.39

 130.47

 130.52

 130.59

 130.59

 130.60

 130.74

 130.75

 130.83

 130.41

 130.30

 130.06

 127.79

 129.91

 637

 623

 607

 614

 621

 629

 626

 603

 626

 649

 648

 614

 613

 619

 615

 618

 609

 622

 630

 635

 643

 643

 644

 660

 662

 670

 624

 612

 587

 384

 571

STORAGE

-17

-14

-16

+7

+7

+8

-3

-23

+23

+23

-34

+6

-4

+3

-9

+13

+8

+5

+8

+0

+1

+16

+2

+8

-46

-12

-25

-203

+187

CHANGE

230

240

248

260

257

249

223

204

205

188

157

133

142

139

133

126

123

137

134

133

134

123

122

129

115

94

42

54

68

-12

180

INFLOW

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

 20

PUTAH

 218

 226

 235

 236

 233

 225

 204

 195

 173

 156

 138

 130

 123

 116

 115

 104

 108

 110

 110

 110

 110

 102

 100

 100

 94

 70

 45

 40

 61

 70

 66

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .16

 .16

 .17

 .14

 .14

 .07

 .17

 .15

 .10

 .09

 .05

 .02

 .06

 .06

 .10

 .06

 .10

 .09

 .10

 .10

 .14

 .42

 .39

 .19

 .13

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .06

 .05

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .37

 .45

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.03

 .33

 .00

 .78

 .06

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2000 RUN DATE: 11/29/2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -81 4,710 4,123 620 8 3.64 3.06

ACRE-FEET -81 9,342 8,178 1,230 16

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,230

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 8,178

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.06

JULY 1, 2000 3.06

 654

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Michael V. Lewis, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of RealD Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2011;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Dated:
June 9, 2011

/s/ MICHAEL V. LEWIS Michael V. Lewis Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of Directors


---



QuickLinks
### §2507c. Office of Victim Advocacy

#### (a) Establishment of Office of Victims 1 Advocacy

#### (1) In general

The President shall establish an Office of Victim Advocacy in Peace Corps headquarters headed by a full-time Victim's Advocate who shall report directly to the Director. The Office of Victim Advocacy may deploy personnel abroad when necessary to help assist victims.

#### (2) Prohibition

Peace Corps Medical Officers, Safety and Security Officers, and program staff may not serve as Victim's Advocates. The Victim's Advocate referred to in paragraph (1) may not have any other duties in the Peace Corps that are not reasonably connected to victim advocacy.

#### (3) Exemption

The Victim's Advocate and any additional Victim's Advocates shall be exempt from the limitations specified in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) under section 2506(a) of this title.

#### (b) Responsibilities

#### (1) Victims of sexual assault

The Office of Victim Advocacy shall help develop and update the sexual assault risk-reduction and response training described in section 2507a of this title and the sexual assault policy described in section 2507b of this title, ensure that volunteers who are victims of sexual assault receive services specified in section 2507b(c) of this title, and facilitate their access to such services.

#### (2) Other crimes

In addition to assisting victims of sexual assault in accordance with paragraph (1), the Office of Victim Advocacy shall assist volunteers who are victims of crime by making such victims aware of the services available to them and facilitating their access to such services.

#### (3) Priority

The Office of Victim Advocacy shall give priority to cases involving serious crimes, including sexual assault and stalking.

#### (c) Status updates

The Office of Victim Advocacy shall provide to volunteers who are victims regular updates on the status of their cases if such volunteers have opted to pursue prosecution.

#### (d) Transition

The Office of Victim Advocacy shall assist volunteers who are victims of crime and whose service has terminated in receiving the services specified in section 2507b(c) of this title requested by such volunteer.

#### (e) Policymaking

The Director of the Peace Corps shall include the head of the Office of Victim Advocacy in agency-wide policymaking processes in the same manner and to the same extent as the directors or associate directors of other offices within the Peace Corps.

(Pub. L. 87–293, title I, §8C, as added Pub. L. 112–57, §2, Nov. 21, 2011, 125 Stat. 739; amended Pub. L. 115–256, title III, §304, Oct. 9, 2018, 132 Stat. 3658.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2018—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 115–256, §304(1), (2), substituted "Victim's Advocate" for "victim advocate" and "Victim's Advocates" for "victim advocates" wherever appearing.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 115–256, §304(3), amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "This section shall cease to be effective on October 1, 2018."

1 So in original. Probably should be "Victim".
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY

PRODUCTION COMPANY

 v.

FOREST RESOURCES, LLC,

KOCJANCIC FAMILY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, HAROLD H.

WOLFINGER, JR., ULTRA

RESOURCES, INC., JACKSON

CORNERS SPORTSMEN, INC.,

NORTHERN FORESTS II, INC., WEVCO

PRODUCTION, INC. AND ANADARKO

PETROLEUM CORPORATION, LP A/K/A

ANADARKO PETROLEUM

CORPORATION 

 v.

FOREST RESOURCES, LLC,

KOCJANCIC FAMILY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, HAROLD H.

WOLFINGER, JR., ULTRA

RESOURCES, INC., JACKSON

CORNERS SPORTSMEN, INC.,

NORTHERN FORESTS II, INC., AND

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION, 

 v.

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY

PRODUCTION COMPANY AND

LANCASTER EXPLORATION &

DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC,

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 141 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION AND TRUSTEES OF THE 

THOMAS E. PROCTOR HEIRS TRUST DATED 

OCTOBER 28, 1980

TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS E. PROCTOR 

HEIRS TRUST

TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS E. PROCTOR 

HEIRS TRUST
[141 MAL 2014 and 142 MAL 2014] - 2

 v.

TRUSTEES OF THE MARGARET O. F.

PROCTOR TRUST

PETITION OF: LANCASTER

EXPLORATION & DEVELOPMENT CO.,

LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY

PRODUCTION COMPANY

 v.

FOREST RESOURCES, LLC,

KOCJANCIC FAMILY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, HAROLD H.

WOLFINGER, JR., ULTRA

RESOURCES, INC., JACKSON

CORNERS SPORTSMEN, INC.,

NORTHERN FORESTS II, INC., WEVCO

PRODUCTION, INC. AND ANADARKO

PETROLEUM CORPORATION, LP A/K/A

ANADARKO PETROLEUM

CORPORATION 

 v.

FOREST RESOURCES, LLC,

KOCJANCIC FAMILY LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP, HAROLD H.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 142 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION AND TRUSTEES OF THE 

THOMAS E. PROCTOR HEIRS TRUST DATED 

OCTOBER 28, 1980

TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS E. PROCTOR 

HEIRS TRUST
[141 MAL 2014 and 142 MAL 2014] - 3

WOLFINGER, JR., ULTRA

RESOURCES, INC., JACKSON

CORNERS SPORTSMEN, INC.,

NORTHERN FORESTS II, INC., AND

INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION

 v.

SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY

PRODUCTION COMPANY AND

LANCASTER EXPLORATION &

DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC,

 v.

TRUSTEES OF THE MARGARET O. F.

PROCTOR TRUST

PETITION OF: LANCASTER

EXPLORATION & DEVELOPMENT CO.,

LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

TRUSTEES OF THE THOMAS E. PROCTOR 

HEIRS TRUST