alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                      62,373,497
<SECURITIES>                                23,057,950
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,334,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,549,000
<INVENTORY>                                 54,465,933
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           225,683,802
<PP&E>                                     103,431,515
<DEPRECIATION>                              37,297,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             311,071,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       48,246,239
<BONDS>                                     42,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   162,254,590
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,520,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               311,071,393
<SALES>                                    134,042,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           134,042,905
<CGS>                                       80,899,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,899,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               100,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,384,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,009,113)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,560,941)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,881,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,183,278)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,698,211)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)


</TABLE>
### §2679a. Procurement contracts

#### (a) Funding for periods not in excess of five years; conditions

Any contract for the procurement of property or services, or both, for the Department of State or the Foreign Service which is funded on the basis of annual appropriations may nevertheless be made for periods not in excess of 5 years when—

(1) appropriations are available and adequate for payment for the first fiscal year and for all potential cancellation costs; and

(2) the Secretary of State determines that—

(A) the need of the Government for the property or service being acquired over the period of the contract is reasonably firm and continuing;

(B) such a contract will serve the best interests of the United States by encouraging effective competition or promoting economies in performance and operation; and

(C) such a method of contracting will not inhibit small business participation.

#### (b) Cancellation of contracts

In the event that funds are not made available for the continuation of such a contract into a subsequent fiscal year, the contract shall be cancelled and any cancellation costs incurred shall be paid from appropriations originally available for the performance of the contract, appropriations currently available for the acquisition of similar property or services and not otherwise obligated, or appropriations made for such cancellation payments.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title I, §14, as added and renumbered title I, Pub. L. 97–241, title I, §121, title II, §202(a), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 280, 282.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2679a, acts Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, §14, as added Oct. 26, 1974, Pub. L. 93–475, §10(a)–(d), 88 Stat. 1441; amended Nov. 29, 1975, Pub. L. 94–141, title IV, §407(a), 89 Stat. 771; Aug. 17, 1977, Pub. L. 95–105, title IV, §410(a), 91 Stat. 854, set forth provisions respecting death guaranties for certain Foreign Service personnel, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(10), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2160. Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title. See section 3973 of this title.

Another prior section 14 of act Aug. 1, 1956, was classified to section 170s of former Title 5, Executive Departments and Government Officers and Employees, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 86–707, title V, §511(a)(2), Sept. 6, 1960, 74 Stat. 800. See section 5922(b) of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2293189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7139209
<ALLOWANCES>                                    207000
<INVENTORY>                                    3731079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              19649987
<PP&E>                                          483573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   66299
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                32891117
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         16155928
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      33589346
<OTHER-SE>                                  (17099484)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  32891117
<SALES>                                       17382763
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              17382763
<CGS>                                         16170002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 16170002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4213993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              178338
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (8448814)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (8448814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (8448814)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 615
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 615 appear at 81 FR 57778, Aug. 24, 2016.

§ 615.4 Eligibility requirements for Extended Benefits. ( a ) *General.* An individual is entitled to Extended Benefits for a week of unemployment which begins in the individual's eligibility period if, with respect to such week, the individual is an exhaustee as defined in § 615.5, files a timely claim for Extended Benefits, and satisfies the pertinent requirements of the applicable State law which are consistent with EUCA and this part.
( b ) *Qualifying for Extended Benefits.* The State law shall specify whether an individual qualifies for Extended Benefits by earnings and employment in the base period for the individual's applicable benefit year as required by section 202(a)(5) of EUCA, (and if it does not also apply this requirement to the payment of sharable regular benefits, the State will not be entitled to a payment under § 615.14), as follows: ( 1 ) One and one-half times the high quarter wages; or
( 2 ) Forty times the most recent weekly benefit amount, and if this alternative is adopted, it shall use the weekly benefit amount (including dependents' allowances) payable for a week of total unemployment (before any reduction because of earnings, pensions or other requirements) which applied to the most recent week of regular benefits; or
( 3 ) Twenty weeks of full-time insured employment, and if this alternative is adopted, the term “full-time” shall have the meaning provided by the State law.
### §290g–18. Eleventh replenishment

(a) The United States Governor of the African Development Fund is authorized to contribute on behalf of the United States $468,165,000 to the eleventh replenishment of the resources of the Fund, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $468,165,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 94–302, title II, §219, as added Pub. L. 111–32, title XI, §1109(b), June 24, 2009, 123 Stat. 1901.)
IMMUCOR, INC.

EXHIBITS

Exhibit 11.1  Statement re computation of per share earnings.

Primary income per share calculations:
                                Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended
                               Feb. 28,    Feb. 29,   Feb. 28,     Feb. 29,
                                 1997       1996       1997         1996


Net income                     $344,225   $788,156    $1,424,113  $2,334,116


Weighted average number of common
shares and common share
equivalents are as follows:
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                 8,075,767  7,907,620     8,061,960  7,830,203

Shares issued from assumed exercise of
  dilutive options and warrants 442,878    745,471       526,360    780,028

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (as adjusted)   8,518,645  8,653,091     8,588,320  8,610,231



Net income per common
  and common equivalent share     $0.04      $0.09      $0.17      $0.27



Fully diluted income per share calculations:
                              Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                              Feb. 28,   Feb. 29,     Feb. 28,   Feb. 29,
                                1997       1996         1997       1996


Net income                     $344,225   $788,156  $1,424,113  $2,334,116


Weighted average number of common
shares and common share
equivalents are as follows:
Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                 8,075,767  7,907,620    8,061,960  7,830,203

Shares issued from assumed exercise of
  dilutive options and warrants 442,878    976,944      537,223    971,085

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (as adjusted)   8,518,645  8,884,564    8,599,183  8,801,288

Net income per common
  and common equivalent share     $0.04      $0.09      $0.17      $0.27

Note:  shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the 
numberof incremental shares which result from applying the "treasury stock 
method" for options and warrants.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 8035** 

JAMES MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Ahmad Muhammad

- Ali , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS; CHIEF MCCLEASE , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken
. Mary G. Lewis , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cv - 04513

- MGL )

Submitted : March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. James Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Muhammad , a state pretrial detainee , seeks to appeal the district court’s order acc epting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ( 2012 ) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (20 12 ). A certif icate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that rea sonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently revi ewed the record and conclude that Muhammad has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Ultitek. Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Paul Freed, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
      and belief:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                April 15, 2008
            
            /s/ PAUL
                FREEDPaul
                FreedChief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,040

 2,699

 2,129

 3,153

 3,493

 2,435

 2,832

 2,477

 2,378

 2,295

 2,248

 2,313

 1,710

 1,760

 3,654

 3,240

 3,543

 2,783

 2,857

 1,730

 1,674

 2,383

 3,202

 2,763

 2,561

 3,540

 2,334

 2,077

 2,611

 3,692

 2,326

 60,948

 59,839

 59,411

 58,463

 58,535

 58,927

 58,293

 58,069

 57,519

 56,902

 56,237

 55,561

 54,980

 53,856

 52,835

 53,664

 54,059

 54,722

 54,630

 54,613

 53,525

 52,439

 52,081

 52,519

 52,518

 52,325

 53,072

 52,636

 51,977

 51,859

 52,773

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2016 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: September 7, 2016

 62,988

 62,538

 61,540

 61,616

 62,028

 61,362

 61,125

 60,546

 59,897

 59,197

 58,485

 57,874

 56,690

 55,616

 56,489

 56,904

 57,602

 57,505

 57,487

 56,343

 55,199

 54,822

 55,283

 55,282

 55,079

 55,865

 55,406

 54,713

 54,588

 55,551

 55,099

 5,831,000

 5,809,000

 5,788,000

 5,767,000

 5,745,000

 5,724,000

 5,703,000

 5,682,000

 5,660,000

 5,639,000

 5,618,000

 5,596,000

 5,575,000

 5,554,000

 5,532,000

 5,511,000

 5,490,000

 5,468,000

 5,447,000

 5,426,000

 5,404,000

 5,383,000

 5,362,000

 5,341,000

 5,319,000

 5,298,000

 5,277,000

 5,255,000

 5,234,000

 5,213,000

 5,191,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 64,156
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

STYLWAN IP HOLDING, LLC, STYLWAN, INC., 

STYLWAN IIT, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

STRESS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

______________________

2023-1269, 2023-1271

______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Texas in No. 4:20-cv-03297, Judge 

Keith P. Ellison.

______________________

Before DYK, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

STOLL, Circuit Judge.

O R D E R

In response to the court’s order to show cause in light 

of Stress Engineering Services, Inc.’s pending counterclaims, Stylwan Ip Holding, LLC; Stylwan, Inc.; and 

Stylwan IIT, LLC request dismissal of this appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. ECF No. 20 at 4. 

We agree the court currently lacks jurisdiction because 

of the absence of a final judgment, see Pandrol USA, LP v. 

Case: 23-1269 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 05/18/2023
 STYLWAN IP HOLDING, LLC v. 

STRESS ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.

2

Airboss Ry. Prods., Inc., 320 F.3d 1354, 1362 (Fed. Cir. 

2003); Pause Tech. LLC v. TiVo Inc., 401 F.3d 1290, 1293

(Fed. Cir. 2005), and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, subject 

to reinstatement under the same docket number(s) without 

the payment of an additional filing fee if, within 60 days of 

this order, either party appeals from the entry of a final 

judgment or obtains a certification for appeal pursuant to 

Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeals are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, 

subject to reinstatement under the same docket number(s)

without the payment of an additional filing fee if, within 60 

days of this order, either party appeals from the entry of a 

final judgment or obtains a certification for appeal pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

 May 18, 2023

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

cc: United States District Court for the Southern District 

of Texas

Case: 23-1269 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 05/18/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,768

 2,428

 1,913

 2,353

 2,430

 2,700

 2,591

 2,797

 1,572

 2,239

 1,647

 4,155

 3,431

 2,435

 3,045

 2,180

 1,337

 2,915

 3,496

 3,030

 1,970

 2,071

 1,911

 2,233

 2,552

 2,724

 2,179

 2,415

 1,755

 1,973

 2,293

 57,970

 57,701

 57,123

 56,084

 55,515

 55,048

 54,861

 54,579

 54,507

 53,275

 52,738

 51,666

 53,030

 53,638

 53,269

 53,499

 52,895

 51,520

 51,713

 52,449

 52,705

 51,941

 51,312

 50,562

 50,155

 50,071

 50,156

 49,718

 49,526

 48,717

 48,156

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2022 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: August 12, 2022

 60,738

 60,129

 59,036

 58,437

 57,945

 57,748

 57,452

 57,376

 56,079

 55,514

 54,385

 55,821

 56,461

 56,073

 56,314

 55,679

 54,232

 54,435

 55,209

 55,479

 54,675

 54,012

 53,223

 52,795

 52,707

 52,795

 52,335

 52,133

 51,281

 50,690

 50,449

 6,491,000

 6,470,000

 6,449,000

 6,427,000

 6,406,000

 6,385,000

 6,363,000

 6,342,000

 6,321,000

 6,300,000

 6,278,000

 6,257,000

 6,236,000

 6,214,000

 6,193,000

 6,172,000

 6,150,000

 6,129,000

 6,108,000

 6,086,000

 6,065,000

 6,044,000

 6,022,000

 6,001,000

 5,980,000

 5,959,000

 5,937,000

 5,916,000

 5,895,000

 5,873,000

 5,852,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 61,021
#### Miguel A. CONTRERAS, Jorge L. Balderrama, and Anita Trujillo, individually, and on behalf of, a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 05-5108.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 8, 2006.

Before MAYER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM:

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

*939
      *AFFIRMED. See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
Author: ICF Consulting, Inc; Abt Associates, Inc.

Source: Integrated Planning Model (IPM) Date Created: 6/18/2008 Date Modified: 3/31/2011 Purpose: Contains NERC region level electricity, coal, and gas prices for Option 1: IM Everywhere policy IPM run.

File Contents: Worksheet Contents ToAbt NERC region level electricity, coal, and gas prices for Option 1: IM Everywhere policy IPM run.

Input Files: External data used in calculations/analysis: None.

FileInfo 1 of 2NERC Level Prices - EPA302ABT_PC_3c
Capacity Price ($/kW-yr) Energy Price (mills/kWh) NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028 FRCC 10.80 17.65 39.36 57.92 61.63 60.36 52.12 53.17 MRO 0.00 54.10 62.28 77.39 35.46 38.43 38.64 40.23 NPCC 0.00 32.85 45.93 70.68 61.05 62.45 58.86 62.11 RFC 3.72 61.81 59.52 75.33 36.47 39.95 39.99 41.50 SERC 14.38 32.47 58.10 71.37 41.31 44.05 42.20 43.42 SPP 10.34 13.75 35.50 44.25 42.26 42.72 39.71 41.80 TRE 14.43 18.84 44.57 54.66 53.27 53.35 48.08 49.86 WECC 4.39 19.98 47.16 62.07 48.98 49.88 44.36 45.65

Natural Gas Price ($/MMBtu) Coal Price ($/MMBtu) NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028 FRCC 6.33 6.55 6.09 6.39 2.26 2.24 2.02 2.10 MRO 5.87 5.87 5.58 5.91 1.27 1.24 1.26 1.27 NPCC 6.74 6.99 6.54 6.87 2.04 2.03 2.04 2.10 RFC 6.48 6.62 6.16 6.50 1.53 1.53 1.55 1.61 SERC 6.02 6.07 5.83 6.15 1.74 1.72 1.70 1.73 SPP 5.71 5.68 5.41 5.72 1.18 1.14 1.17 1.19 TRE 5.72 5.82 5.50 5.84 1.61 1.55 1.57 1.63 WECC 5.93 6.21 5.73 6.05 1.29 1.29 1.35 1.37

ToAbt 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Robert J. Rubin, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, rendered on the 4th day of June, 1918, convicting the defendant of the crime of arson in the second degree.

Dowling, J.:

A careful examination of the record herein convinces us of the defendant’s guilt of the crime of which he was convicted, and that no other conclusion could properly have been arrived at by the jury. There was, in our opinion, sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice Stein by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime, and satisfying the requirements of section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. While we find some technical errors in the course of the trial presented for our consideration by exceptions properly taken, we do not believe that they affect the substantial rights of the defendant, and, therefore, we feel justified in disregarding them, pursuant to the provisions of section 543 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The judgment of conviction will, therefore, be affirmed. Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ., concurred. Judgment affirmed.