alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

Editorial Note on Subpart M of Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart M of part 655 appear at 75 FR 10403, Mar. 5, 2010.

§ 655.1215 How are the Administrator's investigation findings issued? ( a ) The Administrator's determination, issued under § 655.1205(d), shall be served on the complainant, the facility, and other interested parties by personal service or by certified mail at the parties' last known addresses. Where service by certified mail is not accepted by the party, the Administrator may exercise discretion to serve the determination by regular mail. Where the complainant has requested confidentiality, the Administrator shall serve the determination in a manner which will not breach that confidentiality.
( b ) The Administrator's written determination required by § 655.1205(c) shall: ( 1 ) Set forth the determination of the Administrator and the reason or reasons therefore; prescribe any remedies or penalties including the amount of any unpaid wages due, the actions required for compliance with the facility Attestation, and the amount of any civil money penalty assessment and the reason or reasons therefore.
( 2 ) Inform the interested parties that they may request a hearing under § 655.1220.
( 3 ) Inform the interested parties that if a request for a hearing is not received by the Chief Administrative Law Judge within 15 days of the date of the determination, the determination of the Administrator shall become final and not appealable.
( 4 ) Set forth the procedure for requesting a hearing, and give the address of the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
( 5 ) Inform the parties that, under § 655.1255, the Administrator shall notify the Department of Homeland Security and ETA of the occurrence of a violation by the employer.
[75 FR 10406, Mar. 5, 2010]
§ 614.21 Findings of Federal military agency. ( a ) *Findings in military documents.* Information contained in a military document furnished to an ex-servicemember shall constitute findings to which § 614.23 applies as to: ( 1 ) Whether the individual has performed active service in the Armed Forces or the Commissioned Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration;
( 2 ) The beginning and ending dates of the period of active service and “days lost” during such period;
( 3 ) The type of discharge or release terminating the period of active service;
( 4 ) The individuals' pay grade at the time of discharge or release from active service; and
( 5 ) The narrative reason or other reason for separation from active service.
( b ) *Discharges not under honorable conditions.* A military document which shows that an individual's discharge or release was under other than honorable conditions shall also be a finding to which § 614.23 applies.
[53 FR 40555, Oct. 17, 1988]
(No. 73-CC-12

#### Jubal W. McKee, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 24, 1973.*

Juergensmeyer & Zimmerman, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Burks, J.

This matter is now before the court on claimant’s motion, filed April 27,1973, for judgment on the pleadings. *308Respondent has filed no objections to said motion and has, in fact, acknowledged that this is a justifiable claim for the stated amount by filing a letter dated February 16, 1973, from Joseph S. Coughlin, Acting Director of the Department of Corrections, stating that all of the allegations in the complaint are true to the best of his and that department’s knowledge and belief. The file contains other supporting documents.

In granting claimant’s motion, it is necessary to restate the facts on which this award is based, as required by §18 of the Court of Claims Act.

Complaint was filed herein on January 8, 1973, by Jubal W. McKee for payment of excessive deductions withdrawn from his payroll checks by the Department of Corrections for Blue Cross and Blue Shield Health Insurance benefits.

From November 1, 1970, through and including July 31,1971, Jubal W. McKee was employed at the Valley View Boys’ School, Valley View, Illinois, by the State of Illinois, Department of Corrections. During the above specified period, claimant was covered under a group Blue Cross and Blue Shield Health Insurance program, Insurance Certificate No. 22852-40200.

Premiums on the above specified insurance policy were paid in part by the claimant, and were effectuated by bi-monthly deductions from his payroll check.

The above specified deductions from claimant’s bimonthly check were made in accordance with and were equal to the amount established for family rates which would provide protection for an entire family. In fact, claimant was single during the entire above specified time, and the deductions which should have been made, should have been calculated on the basis of individual rates which would provide individual coverage.

*309As a result of the above miscalculations, excessive deductions were made during the entire period of time from November 1, 1970, through and including July 31, 1971, and claimant has suffered a loss thereby in the amount of Two Hundred Twelve and 40/100ths ($212.40) Dollars.

The Department of Corrections, after discussing the matter with its chief personnel officer, its legal advisor and others, concluded that this was a payroll error for which the department was responsible.

There being no issue of law or fact before us, we conclude that claimant is entitled to an award for the amount claimed.

Claimant, Jubal W. McKee, is hereby granted an award in the amount of $212.40.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4168 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 

1980 to require an annual review by the Securities and 

Exchange Commission of the annual government-business 

forum on capital formation that is held pursuant to 

such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4168 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Capital 

3 Formation Enhancement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT-BUSINESS 

5 FORUM ON CAPITAL FORMATION. 

6 Section 503 of the Small Business Investment Incen7 tive Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 80c–1) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(e) The Commission shall— 

10 ‘‘(1) review the findings and recommendations 

11 of the forum; and 

12 ‘‘(2) each time the forum submits a finding or 

13 recommendation to the Commission, promptly issue 

14 a public statement— 

15 ‘‘(A) assessing the finding or recommenda16 tion of the forum; and 

17 ‘‘(B) disclosing the action, if any, the Com18 mission intends to take with respect to the find19 ing or recommendation.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4168 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Investment Incentive 

mation that is held pursuant to such Act. nual government-business forum on capital forSecurities and Exchange Commission of the anAct of 1980 to require an annual review by the
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 26, 2012 

t0319 

Order 

 

March 26, 2012 

143236 

CROWN ENTERPRISES, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143236 

 COA: 286525 

 Wayne CC: 05-519614-CZ 

CITY OF ROMULUS, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

AMERICAN DIESEL TRUCK REPAIR INC., 

RUBEN CHACON, and JUAN MOLINA, 

Third Party Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                       Exhibit 8







October 18, 1999




Consumers Energy Company
212 West Michigan Avenue
Jackson, Michigan 49201

Ladies and Gentlemen:

I am tax counsel to Consumers Energy Company, Consumers Energy Company Financing
III and Consumers Energy Company Financing IV. Reference is made to the
prospectus, (the "Prospectus"), which constitutes part of the registration
statement on Form S-3 ("Registration Statement"), to be filed by Consumers
Energy Company, Consumers Energy Company Financing III and Consumers Energy
Company Financing IV with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof pursuant to the Securities Act of 1993, as amended, for the
registration of, among other things, Trust Originated Preferred Securities
("Preferred Securities") of Consumers Energy Company Financing III and Consumers
Energy Company Financing IV.

I am of the opinion that the statements set forth under the caption "Certain
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences" in the Prospectus constitute an
accurate description, in general terms, of certain United States federal income
tax considerations that may be relevant to the prospective purchasers of the
Preferred Securities.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Theodore J. Vogel
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Kevin E. BensonName:
    Kevin E. BensonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Jeffrey W. SandersName:
    Jeffrey W. SandersTitle:
    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
### §4132. Grievances concerning former members or their survivors

Within the time limitations of section 4134 of this title, a former member of the Service or the surviving spouse (or, if none, another member of the family) of a deceased member or former member of the Service may file a grievance under this subchapter only with respect to allegations described in section 4131(a)(1)(G) of this title.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §1102, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2143.)
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bruce Winfield, Chief Executive Officer of Portal Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 3, 2007





/s/  Bruce Winfield

Bruce Winfield,

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 3,839

 3,352

 3,181

 3,492

 3,407

 3,242

 3,370

 3,295

 3,085

 3,324

 3,454

 3,127

 3,184

 3,101

 3,354

 3,019

 3,671

 3,337

 2,948

 3,783

 3,179

 3,244

 3,337

-937

 2,993

 3,696

 3,375

 4,280

 3,641

 2,998

 63,893

 64,345

 64,312

 64,119

 64,230

 64,255

 64,123

 64,118

 64,042

 63,771

 63,740

 63,834

 63,613

 63,457

 63,231

 63,255

 62,961

 63,300

 63,305

 62,941

 63,387

 63,238

 63,158

 63,170

 59,122

 59,009

 59,570

 59,797

 60,873

 61,289

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2007 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: October 31, 2007

 67,732

 67,697

 67,493

 67,611

 67,637

 67,497

 67,493

 67,413

 67,127

 67,095

 67,194

 66,961

 66,797

 66,558

 66,585

 66,274

 66,632

 66,637

 66,253

 66,724

 66,566

 66,482

 66,495

 62,233

 62,115

 62,705

 62,945

 64,077

 64,514

 64,287

 5,170,000

 5,149,000

 5,127,000

 5,106,000

 5,085,000

 5,063,000

 5,042,000

 5,021,000

 5,000,000

 4,978,000

 4,957,000

 4,936,000

 4,914,000

 4,893,000

 4,872,000

 4,850,000

 4,829,000

 4,808,000

 4,786,000

 4,765,000

 4,744,000

 4,722,000

 4,701,000

 4,680,000

 4,659,000

 4,637,000

 4,616,000

 4,595,000

 4,573,000

 4,552,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 67,256
### §4806. Protection of foreign consulates

The Secretary of State shall take into account security considerations in making determinations with respect to accreditation of all foreign consular personnel in the United States.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title I, §107, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 858; Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §162(g)(5), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–236 substituted "The Secretary of State shall take into account security considerations" for "The Chief of Protocol of the Department of State shall consult with the Assistant Secretary of Diplomatic Security".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–236 applicable with respect to officials, offices, and bureaus of Department of State when executive orders, regulations, or departmental directives implementing the amendments by sections 161 and 162 of Pub. L. 103–236 become effective, or 90 days after Apr. 30, 1994, whichever comes earlier, see section 161(b) of Pub. L. 103–236, as amended, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.
# **Exhibit 31.1**

#  

# **Officer’sCertification**

#  

I, Chris A. Choate,Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AmeriCreditFinancial Services, Inc. (“AmeriCredit”), certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K,and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reportsfiled in respect of periods included in the year covered by this annual report,of AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust 2005-B-M;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, the information inthese reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the servicinginformation required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under thesale and servicing agreement for inclusion in these reports is included inthese reports;

 

4.               I am responsible for reviewing the activitiesperformed by the servicer under the sale and servicing agreement and based uponmy knowledge and the review required under the sale and servicing agreement,and except as disclosed in the report, the servicer has fulfilled itsobligations under the sale and servicing agreement; and

 

5.               The reports disclose all significantdeficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance with the minimum servicingstandards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant,after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform SingleAttestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth inthe sale and servicing agreement, that is included in these reports.

 
| Date:  | February 28, 2006                 |                |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|--------|
|   |                                   | /s/ Chris A. Choate |   |   |
|   | Chris  A. Choate                       |                |
|   | Executive  Vice President,             |                |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer |                |
|        |                                        |                     |        |        |  |  |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.69 Special document retention provisions for Fiscal Years 2022 through 2026 under Public Laws 116-260, 117-43, and 117-70. ( a ) An employer that files a petition with USCIS to employ H-2B workers in fiscal year 2022 under authority for the temporary increase in the numerical limitation provided by Public Law 117-43 and Public Law 117-70 on the same terms as section 105 of Division O, of Public Law 116-260, must maintain for a period of three (3) years from the date of certification, consistent with 20 CFR 655.56 and 29 CFR 503.17, the following: ( 1 ) A copy of the attestation filed pursuant to the regulations in 8 CFR 214.2 governing that temporary increase;
( 2 ) Evidence establishing, at the time of filing the I-129 petition, that the employer's business is suffering irreparable harm or will suffer impending irreparable harm (that is, permanent and severe financial loss) without the ability to employ all of the H-2B workers requested on the petition filed pursuant to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(xi);
( 3 ) Documentary evidence establishing that each of the workers the employer requested and/or instructed to apply for a visa, whether named or unnamed on a petition filed pursuant to 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(xi), have been issued an H-2B visa or otherwise granted H-2B status during one of the last three (3) fiscal years (fiscal year 2019, 2020, or 2021), unless the H-2B worker(s) is a national of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, or Haiti and is counted towards the 6,500 cap described in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(xi)(A)( 2 ). Alternatively, if applicable, employers must maintain documentary evidence that the workers the employer requested and/or instructed to apply for visas are eligible nationals of El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, or Haiti as defined in 8 CFR 214.2(h)(6)(xi)(A)( 2 ); and
( 4 ) If applicable, proof of recruitment efforts set forth in § 655.64(a)(5)(i) through (iv) and a recruitment report that meets the requirements set forth in § 655.48(a)(1) through (4) and (7), and maintained throughout the recruitment period set forth in § 655.64(a)(5)(v).
( b ) DOL or DHS may inspect the documents in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section upon request.
( c ) This section expires on October 1, 2025.
[87 FR 4762, Jan. 28, 2022] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 87 FR 4762, Jan. 28, 2022, § 655.69 was added, effective Jan. 28, 2022, until Sept. 30, 2025.
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      James
      G. Reindl, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2007,
      of Techprecision Corporation;




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.
      Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report;




4.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.
      The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
      directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Dated: August 31, 2007
            
            /s/ James G. ReindlJames
              G. ReindlChief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,369

 2,017

 3,739

 2,396

 2,773

 2,423

 2,378

 1,727

 1,993

 990

 687

 396

 304

 261

 248

 231

 232

 242

 244

 307

 288

 305

 253

 308

 358

 1,066

 2,237

 2,823

 4,319

 5,137

 258

 277

 381

 406

 401

 375

 350

 332

 290

 275

 248

 226

 212

 200

 191

 187

 180

 179

 180

 181

 184

 184

 182

 180

 179

 182

 190

 215

 250

 312

 577

 541

 959

 1,052

 894

 775

 736

 632

 565

 439

 360

 287

 247

 220

 206

 200

 194

 195

 200

 198

 207

 207

 199

 216

 227

 294

 611

 1,494

 1,693

 2,281

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 19, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER