alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 88

 88

 106

 106

 83

 78

 95

 91

 76

 106

 116

 105

 106

 95

 94

 77

 73

 103

 98

 95

 79

 84

 89

 82

 102

 96

 106

 82

 76

 83

 81

 70

 70

 74

 74

 70

 70

 71

 72

 68

 68

 77

 78

 76

 72

 69

 66

 67

 68

 67

 68

 67

 71

 70

 68

 70

 71

 72

 69

 69

 70

 71

 78

 75

 87

 84

 75

 73

 78

 79

 72

 73

 87

 85

 90

 80

 81

 70

 69

 77

 79

 73

 72

 74

 80

 71

 77

 78

 82

 73

 73

 74

 73

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 8, 2014

HIGH LOW MEAN

 81.1

 79.8

 79.7

 79.8

 79.4

 78.8

 76.6

 77.5

 77.9

 78.9

 79.2

 79.1

 79.6

 80.3

 80.7

 79.6

 78.8

 78.3

 78.5

 78.3

 77.9

 77.7

 78.2

 79.2

 80.3

 80.7

 80.2

 79.0

 78.6

 79.4

 79.9

 75.6

 74.7

 74.2

 74.3

 73.9

 73.5

 74.0

 72.8

 71.9

 73.0

 73.6

 73.3

 73.4

 75.3

 76.2

 75.5

 73.7

 73.3

 73.3

 74.3

 73.5

 73.1

 72.8

 73.3

 74.2

 74.9

 75.9

 74.8

 73.8

 74.1

 74.5

 78.3

 77.3

 77.0

 77.0

 76.6

 76.2

 75.2

 75.0

 74.9

 75.8

 76.2

 76.1

 76.6

 77.8

 78.3

 77.4

 76.1

 75.8

 75.8

 76.3

 75.6

 75.2

 75.5

 76.2

 77.2

 77.7

 78.0

 76.9

 76.3

 76.5

 77.1

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.1

 8.2

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.8

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.1

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.3

 8.3

 8.2

 7.2

 7.3

 7.4

 7.3

 7.4

 7.5

 7.6

 7.7

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.4

 7.2

 6.9

 7.1

 7.3

 7.5

 7.5

 7.6

 7.5

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.4

 7.4

 7.3

 7.3

 7.4

 7.6

 7.7

 7.6

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.9

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 7.6

 7.5

 7.6

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 7.9

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.6

 7.7

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           9,682
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,709
<ALLOWANCES>                                       499
<INVENTORY>                                      6,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,549
<PP&E>                                          33,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,833
<BONDS>                                         79,838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,164
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,718
<SALES>                                         47,362
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,362
<CGS>                                           26,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,056
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,279
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,777
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.70


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1550** 

PHILLIP MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

**No. 16**  **- 1551** 

PHILLIP MIZRACH, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham I. Kurland, Deceased,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellee.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv
- 01153

- RDB; 1:08

- cv
- 02030

- AMD )

Submitted : March 1, 2017 Decided: March 9, 20172 Before TRAXLER and THACKER , Circuit Judg es , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Phillip Mizrach, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Phillip Mizrach appeals the district court’s orders denying
several postjudgment motions he filed following the dismissal of

two F ederal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671

- 2680 (2 012) complaints. We have reviewed the record included on appeal and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Mizrach v. United States , Nos. 1:11

-

cv
- 01153

- RDB; 1:08

- cv
- 02030

- AMD (D. Md. Nov. 12, 2015; Apr. 13,
2016) **.** We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §290j. Establishment of the Fund

#### (a) Agreement with Government of India; program purposes

The President is authorized to enter into an agreement with the Government of India for the establishment of a fund (hereafter in this subchapter referred to as the "Fund") which would provide grants and other assistance for cultural, educational, and scientific programs of mutual interest. Such programs may include exchanges of persons, exchanges of information, and other programs of study, research, and scholarly cooperation. The agreement may also provide for the establishment of an endowment, a foundation, or other means to carry out the purposes of the agreement.

#### (b) United States representatives

The United States representatives on any board or other entity created in accordance with the agreement to administer the Fund shall be designated by the President predominately from among representatives of United States Government agencies, including those administering programs which may be supported in whole or in part by the Fund.

#### (c) Funding of programs

United States Government agencies carrying out programs of the types specified in subsection (a) may receive amounts directly from the Fund for use in carrying out those programs.

(Pub. L. 98–164, title IX, §902, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1051.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 98–164, title IX, §901, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1051, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'United States-India Fund for Cultural, Educational, and Scientific Cooperation Act'."

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Ex. Ord. No. 12517. Delegation Concerning United States-India Fund for Cultural, Educational, and Scientific Cooperation

Ex. Ord. No. 12517, May 29, 1985, 50 F.R. 23105, provided:

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and statutes of the United States of America, including section 301 of Title 3 of the United States Code, and in order to delegate certain functions concerning the United States-India Fund for Cultural, Educational, and Scientific Cooperation to the Secretary of State, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. All functions vested in the President by the United States-India Fund for Cultural, Educational, and Scientific Cooperation Act (Title IX of Public Law 98–164, 97 Stat. 1051; "the Act") [22 U.S.C. 290j et seq.] are delegated to the Secretary of State.

Sec. 2. India rupees provided to the President for purposes of Title IX of the Act and under Title III of the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1985 (Public Law 98–411, 98 Stat. 1545) are allocated to the Secretary of the Treasury for investment to generate earnings for purposes of Title IX of the Act.

Ronald Reagan.
Maintenance
Project Contract (Translation)


 


	Contract
                                         Between
	Customer
	Reg.
    No.	609-83-00455	Contract
    Manager	Junhee
    Kim
	Name
	R.O.K.
Navy Logistic Command
	Project
Manager
	Ji
Soo Kim 

055-549-1642

	Company
	Reg.
    No.	314-81-38419	Company
    No.	1601110109715
	Name	e-Marine
    Co., Ltd.	CEO	Ung
        Gyu Kim

        (070-7204-9313)

	Address	4th
    Floor, 15-14, Samsan-ro 308beon-gil Nam-gu, Ulsan, 44715 South Korea
	Bank	Kookmin	Account
    No.	468250010871	Account
    Owner	e-Marine
	Contract
                                         Details
	Contract
    Name	Anti-Submarine
    War-Training Simulator (ASWTT) Maintenance
	Contract
        Amount

        (Advance
	General	603,680,000
    Won	 	 	 
	Treasury
    Bonds	None	 	 	 	 
	Total	603,680,000
    Won	 	 	 
	Contract
    Amount (Total)	754,600,000
    Won	 	 	 
	Contract
    Warranty	75,460,000
    Won	 	 	 
	Deliquency
    Rate	0.25%	 	 	 	 
	Price
    Fluctuation Contract	Accodring
    to Article 64 (1) Item 1 Adjustment rate
	Contract
    Period	2017.12.27
    - 2019.02.28
	Project
    Period	2017.12.27
    - 2019.02.28
	Delivery
    Place	Respective
    Unit	Stamp
    Tax	None
	Other
    Matters	Long-term
partial payments (50,306,680 won in ’17, 603,680,000 won in ’18,100,613,320 won in ’20)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at October 31, 1999 (Unaudited) and the Statement of Income for the Nine
Months Ended October 31, 1999 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,242,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               55,706,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,027,715
<INVENTORY>                                  7,724,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            67,070,697
<PP&E>                                      26,342,032
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,012,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             141,633,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       37,195,308
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       170,694
<OTHER-SE>                                  99,826,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               141,633,863
<SALES>                                     57,679,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,679,044
<CGS>                                       34,889,160
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,501,990
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (175,964)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             791,621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,758,998
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,067,970
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,691,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,691,028
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
(No. 6660

#### Herschel L. Sunley, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Departments of Public Health and General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December*8, *1972.*

Herschel L. Sunley, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Berlin, C.J.
EXHIBIT 11


                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

             For the Nine Month Period Ended September 30,
                            2001  and  2000

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(Dollars in Thousands)
                                                   2001            2000

                                         <c>              <c>
Primary
  Net Income                                $   3,854        $   3,844
    Shares
     Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding              2,833,727        2,833,727
     Adjustments - increases or
     decreases                              None             None
     Weighted average number of
     common shares outstanding
     as adjusted                            2,833,727        2,833,727

     Primary earnings per common
      share                                 $    1.36        $    1.36


  Assuming full dilution
   Net Income                               $   3,854        $   3,844
    Shares
    Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding               2,833,727        2,833,727
    Adjustments - increases or
    decreases                               None             None
    Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding
    as adjusted                             2,833,727        2,833,727

    Earnings per common share
     assuming full dilution                 $    1.36        $    1.36



</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 775 V

UNPUBLISHED

KELLY STEELE

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: October 29, 2021

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;
Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC , for P etitioner.

Kyle Edward Pozza , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for R espondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On June 25, 2020

, Kelly Steele filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) a s a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine ad ministered on October 2, 20 18 . Petition at 1

. Petitioner further alleges that the vaccine was

administered within the Unite d States, tha t she has suffered the res idual effects of her injury for more than six mont hs, an d that neither Petitioner, nor any other p arty, has ever

received compensation in the form of an award for her injury or filed a n action fo r her injury . Petition at 1, 3

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that

the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease
of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2 On October 26, 2021

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at

1. Specifically, R espondent has concluded that Petitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualification s and Aids to Interpretation

. Id. at 4

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
§ 681.120 What does a standing youth committee do? Under the direction of the Local WDB, a standing youth committee may: ( a ) Recommend policy direction to the Local WDB for the design, development, and implementation of programs that benefit all youth;
( b ) Recommend the design of a comprehensive community workforce development system to ensure a full range of services and opportunities for all youth, including disconnected youth;
( c ) Recommend ways to leverage resources and coordinate services among schools, public programs, and community-based organizations serving youth;
( d ) Recommend ways to coordinate youth services and recommend eligible youth service providers;
( e ) Provide on-going leadership and support for continuous quality improvement for local youth programs;
( f ) Assist with planning, operational, and other issues relating to the provision of services to youth; and
( g ) If so delegated by the Local WDB after consultation with the chief elected official (CEO), oversee eligible youth providers, as well as other youth program oversight responsibilities.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edwin H. Risley, Appellant.

Judgment of conviction and order affirmed. All concurred; Merrell, J., not sitting.
### §4857. Advisory Panel on Overseas Security

Not later than 90 days after August 27, 1986, the Secretary of State shall submit a report to the Congress on the implementation of the 91 recommendations contained in the final report of the Advisory Panel on Overseas Security. If any such recommendation has been rejected, the Secretary shall provide the reasons why that recommendation was rejected.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title IV, §407, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 866.)
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.310 What makes an application a claim for benefits. An application will be considered a claim for benefits, if the following requirements are met: ( a ) An application form prescribed by us must be filled out.
( b ) be filed at a social security office, at another Federal or State office we have designated to receive applications for us, or with a person we have authorized to receive applications for us. See § 416.325.
( c ) The claimant or someone who may sign an application for the claimant must sign the application. See §§ 416.315 and 416.320.
( d ) The claimant must be alive at the time the application is filed. See §§ 416.340, 416.345, and 416.351 for exceptions.
[45 FR 48120, July 18, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 44926, Aug. 31, 1994]
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Yearly Report of AISystems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1. Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of AISystems, Inc.
  Date: April 14, 2011
  AISYSTEMS INC.By:
/s/ Stephen C. JohnstonStephen C. JohnstonChief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

NOE MOMPOINT and PHO E BE MOMPOINT
, Appellant s ,

v.

MTGLQ INVESTORS, LP
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20 22

- 1502

[ November 16, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Christopher Pole , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE

- 18009624

.

Nicole R. Moskowitz of Neustein L aw Group, P.A., Aventura, for appellant s

.

Nicholas S. Agnello of Burr & Forman LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, G ERBER and C ONNER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### §53. Transferred

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, R.S. §1689, which related to various provisions applicable to particular classes of consular officers, was transferred to section 4191 of this title.
### §457. Appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated from time to time, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such amounts as may be necessary to carry out the provisions and accomplish the purposes of this subchapter.

(Nov. 4, 1939, ch. 2, §18, 54 Stat. 12.)