alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 542.70

 542.61

 542.50

 541.70

 540.80

 540.00

 539.15

 538.36

 537.72

 536.99

 536.31

 535.24

 534.50

 533.50

 532.80

 532.00

 531.40

 531.10

 530.96

 530.29

 530.41

 530.40

 530.67

 531.10

 531.40

 531.64

 531.96

 532.20

 532.40

 532.50

 532.60

 2,024,025

 2,022,882

 2,021,486

 2,011,340

 1,999,948

 1,989,840

 1,979,120

 1,969,175

 1,961,131

 1,951,970

 1,943,449

 1,930,069

 1,920,833

 1,908,378

 1,899,676

 1,889,748

 1,882,313

 1,878,600

 1,876,868

 1,868,587

 1,870,069

 1,869,945

 1,873,282

 1,878,600

 1,882,313

 1,885,286

 1,889,252

 1,892,228

 1,894,710

 1,895,951

 1,897,192

STORAGE

+0

-1,143

-1,396

-10,146

-11,392

-10,108

-10,720

-9,945

-8,044

-9,161

-8,521

-13,380

-9,236

-12,455

-8,702

-9,928

-7,435

-3,713

-1,732

-8,281

+1,482

-124

+3,337

+5,318

+3,713

+2,973

+3,966

+2,976

+2,482

+1,241

+1,241

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

917

1,788

0

1,418

1,015

3,784

4,340

3,790

2,447

2,891

2,275

2,098

2,445

3,017

PUMPING

 0

 0

 875

 4,715

 5,588

 4,794

 5,572

 4,953

 3,295

 4,653

 4,310

 6,859

 4,467

 6,484

 4,193

 5,276

 3,929

 2,736

 2,386

 4,144

 771

 1,181

 1,184

 769

 1,357

 767

 510

 510

 0

 1,876

 1,800

POWER

 15

 47

 54

 38

 30

 45

 36

 36

 47

 47

 54

 57

 70

 71

 54

 66

 69

 72

 65

 62

 42

 29

 36

 39

 42

 17

 16

 73

 92

 93

 118

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+15

-529

+226

-362

-126

-257

+204

-25

-713

+82

+69

+170

-119

+275

-140

+336

+250

+19

-211

+30

+143

+133

-881

-851

-519

-163

-365

-192

-755

+150

-473

OR

 136

 164

 185

 152

 164

 122

 155

 175

 183

 154

 194

 250

 242

 242

 181

 205

 240

 240

 300

 203

 108

 4

 120

 120

 168

 209

 168

 152

 144

 157

 185

C.F.S.

 .33

 .40

 .45

 .37

 .40

 .30

 .38

 .43

 .45

 .38

 .48

 .62

 .60

 .60

 .45

 .51

 .60

 .60

 .75

 .51

 .27

 .01

 .30

 .30

 .42

 .52

 .42

 .38

 .36

 .39

 .46

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR August 10, 2006

DAILY OPERATIONS

MAY 2006 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -126,833 32,225 89,954 1,632 0 -4,579 5,422 13.44 1.09

ACRE-FEET -126,833 63,918 178,424 3,237 0 -9,082 10,755

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 178,424

PACHECO TUNNEL 3,237 TOTAL 181,661

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2005 TO DATE = 11.53

 2,024,025

SPILL 0 1.09

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of PowerShares
DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Kevin Rich         
|Kevin Rich             
|Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 27, 2007
Cobbler II Project Planning Area - Other Undeveloped Lands

Interactions between Other Undeveloped Lands and Alternative C Harvest Units and Prescribed Fire

138

45

241

207

5

127

201

28

129

119

110

243

128

151

190

233

194

213

40

150

239

136

200

108

135

180

130

212

7

225

240

196

8

67

108

4

175

235

40

161

87

222

46

170

185

141

168

125

55

58

121

100

206

75

114

167

108

56

159

178

64

124

92

42

139

242

73

148

145

115

209

205

152

181

220

203

133

17

201

112

215

235

68

131

123

39

142

183

146

235

6

160

13

134

195

91

234

15

216

59

23

163

41

105

166

34

204

172

155

157

118

83

210

90

29

116

202

10

217

37

60

228

22

19

62

171

57

177

211

0

72

197

230

199

165

107

27

98

154

43

82

156

2

147

76

188

54

11

158

25

14

218

173

48

89

30

227

33

189

36

95

169

31

193

106

153

182

174

38

223

49

61

109

20

93

79

104

21

80

101

208

113

164

179

187

176

47

69

126

66

122

86

70

231

143

51

184

63

140

137

Legend

Cobbler II Project Planning Area

District Boundary

Forest Roads

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Undeveloped Lands

Grande Ronde IRA

Alternative C Harvest Units

Non-Commercial Thinning Units

Prescribed Fire Depicts other undeveloped lands in relation to

Alt. C harvest units and prescribed burning.

All acres meeting Potential Wilderness

inventory criteria (FSH 1909.12 ch. 71) have been

removed from the map. Other undeveloped

lands that are intersected by harvest units have had

environmental effects disclosed in Ch. 3 of Cobbler II EIS.

2 1 0 2 Miles

 ́

H-11

99 Polygon identification number associated with Tables

H-1B and H-1C in Cobbler II EIS - Appendix H
### §3616. Joint Commission on the Environment

#### (a) Establishment; composition

The United States and the Republic of Panama, in accordance with the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977, shall establish a Joint Commission on the Environment (hereinafter in this section referred to as the "Joint Commission") to be composed of not more than three representatives of the United States and three representatives of the Republic of Panama, or such other equivalent numbers of representatives as may be agreed upon by the Governments of the two countries. The United States members of the Joint Commission shall periodically review the implementation of the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977 with respect to its impact on the environment and shall, jointly with the representatives of the Government of Panama, make recommendations to the United States Government and the Government of the Republic of Panama with respect to ways to avoid or mitigate adverse environmental impacts resulting from actions taken pursuant to such Treaty.

#### (b) Appointment; compensation and travel expenses

Representatives of the United States on the Joint Commission shall be appointed by the President and shall serve at the pleasure of the President. Such representatives shall serve without compensation but shall be allowed travel or transportation expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in accordance with section 3617 of this title.

#### (c) Protection of pay, seniority, or other rights or benefits of appointed or detailed Federal employees

Any Federal employee subject to the civil service laws and regulations who is detailed to serve with, or appointed by, the United States representatives on the Joint Commission shall not lose any pay, seniority, or other rights or benefits by reason of such detail or appointment.

#### (d) Compensation of necessary personnel

The United States representatives on the Joint Commission may, to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriation Acts, appoint and fix the compensation of such personnel as the representatives of the United States on the Joint Commission may consider necessary for the participation of the United States on the Joint Commission.

#### (e) Rules of procedure; establishment; approval

The United States representatives on the Joint Commission may, in cooperation with the representatives of the Republic of Panama on the Joint Commission, establish rules of procedure to be used by the Joint Commission in conducting its affairs, subject to the approval of such rules by the Governments of the United States and the Republic of Panama.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1106, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 457.)
# C_2016055EN.01013501.xml

| 12.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/135 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/135

---

P7_TA(2013)0207

Oral amendments and other oral modifications (interpretation of Rule 156(6) of the Rules of Procedure)

European Parliament decision of 21 May 2013 concerning oral amendments and other oral modifications (interpretation of Rule 156(6) of the Rules of Procedure)

(2016/C 055/26)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the letter of 24 April 2013 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 24 April 2013 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 156(6):
  ‘On a proposal from the President, an oral amendment, or any other oral modification, shall be treated in the same way as an amendment not distributed in all the official languages. If the President considers it admissible under Rule 157(3), and save in the case of objection under Rule 156(6), it shall be put to the vote in accordance with the order of voting established.
  In committee, the number of votes needed to object to such an amendment or such a modification is established on the basis of Rule 196 proportionally to that applicable in plenary, rounded up where necessary to the nearest complete number.’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 156(6):

‘On a proposal from the President, an oral amendment, or any other oral modification, shall be treated in the same way as an amendment not distributed in all the official languages. If the President considers it admissible under Rule 157(3), and save in the case of objection under Rule 156(6), it shall be put to the vote in accordance with the order of voting established.

In committee, the number of votes needed to object to such an amendment or such a modification is established on the basis of Rule 196 proportionally to that applicable in plenary, rounded up where necessary to the nearest complete number.’

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
#### § 422.501 Applications and other forms used in Social Security Administration programs.

This subpart lists the applications and some of the related forms prescribed by the Social Security Administration for use by the public in applying for benefits under titles II and XVIII of the Social Security Act and the black lung benefits program (Part B, title IV of the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, as amended).

[38 FR 11450, May 8, 1973]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 35,225

 35,410

 35,633

 35,680

 35,294

 35,294

 35,410

 35,481

 35,317

 35,387

 35,085

 34,796

 34,187

 35,201

 35,317

 34,935

 34,324

 34,073

 33,722

 33,699

 33,699

 33,835

 33,948

 33,902

 33,971

 33,744

 33,767

 33,767

 33,789

 33,789

 20,118

 20,107

 20,137

 20,183

 20,295

 20,466

 20,571

 20,657

 20,685

 20,677

 20,645

 20,645

 20,685

 20,696

 20,704

 20,677

 20,638

 20,571

 20,458

 20,334

 20,203

 20,107

 19,996

 19,866

 19,699

 19,552

 19,395

 19,268

 19,116

 18,935

STORAGE - A.F.

 14,071

 15,544

 15,784

 15,984

 15,912

 15,939

 16,160

 16,026

 15,709

 15,433

 15,664

 15,973

 16,110

 15,996

 15,871

 15,645

 15,444

 15,034

 14,661

 14,350

 14,508

 14,551

 14,512

 14,092

 13,807

 13,465

 13,512

 13,556

 13,298

 12,942

 14,283

 14,223

 13,812

 14,467

 14,467

 14,840

 14,223

 14,654

 14,422

 14,669

 14,685

 14,669

 14,575

 14,530

 14,639

 14,606

 14,902

 14,825

 14,591

 14,621

 14,362

 14,639

 13,768

 13,692

 13,707

 14,485

 14,193

 14,902

 14,621

 14,193

 115,978

 117,539

 117,477

 118,591

 118,092

 118,767

 118,511

 118,992

 117,958

 118,470

 118,298

 118,572

 117,771

 118,507

 118,705

 118,560

 118,115

 117,269

 115,207

 114,985

 114,690

 114,948

 114,156

 113,377

 112,879

 112,968

 112,866

 114,045

 113,304

 112,190

2,705

2,977

3,456

2,708

3,732

4,578

4,062

3,425

3,994

3,212

3,876

3,430

3,349

3,131

3,361

3,492

3,657

3,949

4,463

4,497

3,820

3,804

3,874

3,845

3,679

3,683

3,941

2,695

3,772

3,907

2,865

3,764

3,425

3,270

3,480

4,918

3,933

3,668

3,473

3,470

3,789

3,568

2,962

3,502

3,461

3,419

3,433

3,522

3,423

4,385

3,671

3,934

3,475

3,452

3,428

3,728

3,890

3,289

3,398

3,345

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2009 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT SHASTA DAM RUN DATE: December 1, 2009

TOTALS -3,470 107,340

* October 1, 212,909

 32,281

 32,255

 32,111

 32,277

 32,124

 32,228

 32,147

 32,174

 31,825

 32,304

 32,219

 32,489

 32,214

 32,084

 32,174

 32,697

 32,807

 32,766

 31,775

 31,981

 31,918

 31,816

 31,932

 31,825

 31,695

 31,722

 31,999

 32,552

 32,480

 32,331

269.8

277.2

284.0

290.5

297.4

307.2

315.0

322.2

329.1

336.0

343.5

350.6

356.5

363.4

370.3

377.1

383.9

390.9

397.7

406.4

413.6

421.4

428.3

435.2

442.0

449.4

457.1

463.6

470.4

477.0

LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV RES

IRON

CANYON

RES

PIT 6 PIT 7

2009 TO DATE

SHASTA

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

+318

+1,561

-62

+1,114

-499

+675

-256

+481

-1,034

+512

-172

+274

-801

+736

+198

-145

-445

-846

-2,062

-222

-295

+258

-792

-779

-498

+89

-102

+1,179

-741

-1,114

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

+160

+787

-31

+562

-252

+340

-129

+243

-521

+258

-87

+138

-404

+371

+100

-73

-224

-427

-1,040

-112

-149

+130

-399

-393

-251

+45

-51

+594

-374

-562
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6700

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

REGGIE ANDRE BECKTON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. W. Earl Britt, 

Senior District Judge. (7:11-cr-00061-BR-1; 7:15-cv-00068-BR)

Submitted: September 9, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reggie Andre Beckton, Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III, 

Dennis Michael Duffy, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United 

States Attorneys, S. Katherine Burnette, Tobin Webb Lathan, Seth 

Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Reggie Andre Beckton seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Beckton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny Beckton’s motions for a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §287d. Use of armed forces; limitations

The President is authorized to negotiate a special agreement or agreements with the Security Council which shall be subject to the approval of the Congress by appropriate Act or joint resolution, providing for the numbers and types of armed forces, their degree of readiness and general location, and the nature of facilities and assistance, including rights of passage, to be made available to the Security Council on its call for the purpose of maintaining international peace and security in accordance with article 43 of said Charter. The President shall not be deemed to require the authorization of the Congress to make available to the Security Council on its call in order to take action under article 42 of said Charter and pursuant to such special agreement or agreements the armed forces, facilities, or assistance provided for therein: Provided, That, except as authorized in section 287d–1 of this title, nothing herein contained shall be construed as an authorization to the President by the Congress to make available to the Security Council for such purpose armed forces, facilities, or assistance in addition to the forces, facilities, and assistance provided for in such special agreement or agreements.

(Dec. 20, 1945, ch. 583, §6, 59 Stat. 621; Oct. 10, 1949, ch. 660, §4, 63 Stat. 735.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Article 43 of said Charter and article 42 of said Charter, referred to in text, are articles of the United Nations Charter.

Herein, referred to in text, means act Dec. 20, 1945, ch. 583, 59 Stat. 619, known as the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, which is classified generally to this subchapter (§287 et seq.). For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 287 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1949—Act Oct. 10, 1949, inserted ", except as authorized in section 287d–1 of this title," in proviso.
Exhibit 32.2

Certifications Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. for the year ended December 25, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as the
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc., certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and will be retained by Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 27, 2006

/S/     THOMAS J. PENNISON,
JR.Thomas J. Pennison, Jr.Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officerand Secretary
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title, etc., for the Opening and Extending of Van Alst Avenue, etc.

Motion granted, without costs. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
§ 667.730 What is the procedure to handle a recipient's request for advance approval of contemplated corrective actions? ( a ) The recipient may request advance approval from the Grant Officer for contemplated corrective actions, including debt collection actions, which the recipient plans to initiate or to forego. The recipient's request must include a description and an assessment of all actions taken by the subrecipients to collect the misspent funds.
( b ) Based on the recipient's request, the Grant Officer may determine that the recipient may forego certain collection actions against a subrecipient when: ( 1 ) The subrecipient meets the criteria set forth in section 184(d)(2) of the Act;
( 2 ) The misexpenditure of funds: ( i ) Was not made by that subrecipient but by an entity that received WIA funds from that subrecipient;
( ii ) Was not a violation of section 184(d)(1) of the Act, and did not constitute fraud; or
( iii ) If fraud did exist, ( A ) It was perpetrated against the subrecipient; and:
( B ) The subrecipient discovered, investigated, reported, and cooperated in any prosecution of the perpetrator of the fraud; and
( C ) After aggressive debt collection action, it has been documented that further attempts at debt collection from the perpetrator of the fraud would be inappropriate or futile;
( 3 ) A final determination which disallows the misexpenditure and establishes a debt has been issued at the appropriate level;
( 4 ) Final action within the recipient's appeal system has been completed; and
( 5 ) Further debt collection action by that subrecipient or the recipient would be either inappropriate or futile.