alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James
R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Corinne Pankovcin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ James R. Maher   
|Name:                 |  | James R. Maher                       
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|Date:                 |  | March 1, 2012                        
|                     
|/s/ Corinne Pankovcin
|Name:                 |  | Corinne Pankovcin                    
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|Date:                 |  | March 1, 2012
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 6-K

       REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16
                    UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                             Date: February 11, 2004

                        Commission File Number 001-12510
                                              -----------

                                  ROYAL AHOLD
                 -----------------------------------------------
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

               Albert Heijnweg 1, 1507 EH Zaandam, The Netherlands
               ---------------------------------------------------
                     (Address of principal executive office)





     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual
reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                           Form 20-F   X             Form 40-F
                                      ---                       -----

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                           Yes                       No    X
                                 ---                      ---

     If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the
registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-________.

<PAGE>


     On February 11, 2004, Koninklijke Ahold N.V. ("Royal Ahold" or the
"Company") issued a press release announcing the Company's intention to divest
its BI-LO and Bruno's subsidiaries. A copy of the press release is attached
hereto as Exhibit 99.1.



<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


                                      KONINKLIJKE AHOLD N.V.

                                      /s/ H.R. Ryopponen
                                      --------------------------------------
Date:  February 12, 2004              By:     H.R. Ryopponen
                                      Title:  Executive Vice President and CFO


<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT INDEX


The following exhibit has been filed as part of this Form 6-K:


Exhibit   Description
-------   -----------

99.1      Royal Ahold press release, dated February 11, 2004, announcing the
          Company's intention to divest its BI-LO and Bruno's subsidiaries
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA Standing Review Board Handbook: Revision BThis SRB Handbook provides review guidance for the program and project communities and for the SRBs regarding the expectations, processes, products, timelines, and working interfaces with review organizations, Centers, Mission Directorates, Mission Support Organizations, and Management Councils. It provides guidelines for membership selection, review implementation, review products, and reporting of results. The SRB Handbook guidance may be tailored, with the Convening Authorities' approval, to meet the needs of the Agency, Mission Directorates, Centers, and the programs and projects being reviewed. The final review agreement of the SRB, program and project, and Convening Authorities for program and project Life-Cycle Reviews (LCRs) is documented in the terms of reference, as described in Section 4.1 and Appendix H.Document ID20170000280Acquisition SourceHeadquartersDocument TypeSpecial Publication (SP)AuthorsTahani R Amer*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*James N Ortiz*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Michelle Colloway*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Richard M Greathouse*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Charles A Polen*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Ronald L Baker*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Heidemarie E Borchardt*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Christopher C Chromik*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Erin Moran*(TEAMS3)*Michael W Paraska*(TEAMS3)*Deborah A Moore*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Simon S Chung*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Date AcquiredJanuary 5, 2017Publication DateDecember 1, 2016Subject CategoryAdministration And ManagementDocumentation And Information ScienceReport/Patent NumberNASA/SP-2016-3706/REV BFunding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NASADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameTypeSRB Handbook Rev B corrected-5-21-2021.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20230001306See AlsoNASA Standing Review Board Handbook20140008530See AlsoNASA Standing Review Board Handbookvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §279a. Authorization of appropriations for payment of United States expenses in Organization; limitation of contributions

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums as may be required for expenditure under the direction of the Secretary of State, for the payment by the United States of its proportionate share in the expenses of the Organization: Provided, That the percentage contribution of the United States to the total annual budget of the Organization shall not exceed 33.33 per centum.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 342, §2, 59 Stat. 529; Sept. 21, 1950, ch. 976, §1(b), 64 Stat. 902; Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title IV, §421, as added July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §8(n), 70 Stat. 559; Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §544(b), as added Pub. L. 85–141, §11(b)(2), Aug. 14, 1957, 71 Stat. 365; Pub. L. 87–195, pt. IV, §709, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 465.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1961—Pub. L. 87–195 struck out provisions which limited the annual appropriations to not more than $3,000,000.

1957—Pub. L. 85–141, §11(b)(2), added section 544(b) to act August 26, 1954, which section 544(b) amended this section by increasing the maximum percentage contribution from 31.5 to 33.33 per centum.

1956—Act July 18, 1956, increased authorized annual appropriation from $2,000,000, to $3,000,000, and inserted provisions limiting percentage contribution of United States to total annual budget to not more than 31.5 per centum.

1950—Joint Res. Sept. 21, 1950, increased authorized annual appropriation from $1,250,000 to $2,000,000.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Repeals

Section 709 of Pub. L. 87–195, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed by section 401 of Pub. L. 87–565, pt. IV, Aug. 1, 1962, 76 Stat. 263, except insofar as section 709 affected this section.

Section 544(b) of act Aug. 26, 1954, cited as a credit to this section, was repealed by Pub. L. 85–477, ch. IV, §401(h), June 30, 1958, 72 Stat. 270, except insofar as such section 544(b) affected this section.

Section 421 of act August 26, 1954, cited as a credit to this section was repealed by section 8(n) of Pub. L. 85–141, except insofar as section 421 affected this section.

#### Similar Provisions

Similar provisions were contained in the Department of State Appropriation Act, 1946, act July 5, 1946, ch. 541, title I, 60 Stat. 453.

#### Annual Appropriations

Annual appropriations to meet the obligations of membership in various international organizations were contained in acts listed in a note set out under section 269a of this title.

#### Limitation of Contributions

Contributions by United States, except for special projects, limited to amount provided by Joint Res. Sept. 21, 1950, consent by State Department and reports to Congress, see section 262a of this title.
From: Klara Zimmerman [mailto:Klara_Zimmerman@abtassoc.com]

Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 11:43 AM

To: [Addressees] Cc: Wen, Chen <Wen.Chen@epa.gov> Subject: Request for feedback on Safer Choice Product Recognition Program

[Salutation],

I’m writing from Abt Associates on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Safer Choice Program. We're currently supporting Safer Choice in conducting research on the burden associated with its Product Recognition Program. The Paperwork Redu ction Act requires that federal agencies re

- evaluate every three years the recordkeeping and reporting burden associated with information collection requests of this nature.

As a potential respondent, we would value your feedback about the burden associ ated with the Safer Choice Product Recognition Program to ensure that our estimates are reasonable.

Attached is a copy of the Information Collection Request (ICR) for the Safer Choice Product Recognition Program. For your reference, here is a link to t he federal register notice: https://federalregister.gov/a/2016

- 05175

Please give particular attention to Section 6 of the ICR, which includes burden estimates associated with the Product Recognition Program. When reviewing, please consider the

followi ng questions: (i) is the proposed collection of information necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility?; (ii) are the Agency's estimates of the burden of th e proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used, reasonable and accurate?; (iii) could the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected be improved?

We would greatly appreciate your feedback on the above items and also value your suggestions for future improvements to the Product Recognition Program. Please send me any comments or feedback by May 9, 2016.

Thanks in advance for your time and assistance!

Sincerely,

Klara Zimm erman Environment & Natural Resources Division | Abt Associates 4550 Montgomery Avenue Suite 800 North | Bethesda, MD 20814 301·634·1722 | www.abtassociates.com
Figure 3.11. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the upstream vicinity of Blue Parkway.

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 56,670 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 770 feet

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

>8 to 10

94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20"

39°01'40"

39°01'50"

39°02'

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

Blue Parkway Brighton Avenue

 Hardesty Avenue

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
### §5958. Authorization for additional fiscal year 1993 assistance to independent states of the former Soviet Union

#### (a) Authorization of appropriations

There is hereby authorized to be appropriated for fiscal year 1993 for "Operation and Maintenance, Defense Agencies" the additional sum of $979,000,000, to be available for the purposes of providing assistance to the independent states of the former Soviet Union.

#### (b) Authorization of transfer of funds

The Secretary of Defense may, to the extent provided in appropriations Acts, transfer from the account "Operation and Maintenance, Defense Agencies" for fiscal year 1993 a sum not to exceed the amount appropriated pursuant to the authorization in subsection (a) to—

(1) other accounts of the Department of Defense for the purpose of providing assistance to the independent states of the former Soviet Union; or

(2) appropriations available to the Department of State and other agencies of the United States Government for the purpose of providing assistance to the independent states of the former Soviet Union for programs that the President determines will increase the national security of the United States.

#### (c) Administrative provisions

(1) Amounts transferred under subsection (b) shall be available subject to the same terms and conditions as the appropriations to which transferred.

(2) The authority to make transfers pursuant to this section is in addition to any other transfer authority of the Department of Defense.

#### (d) Coordination of programs

The President shall coordinate the programs described in subsection (b) with those authorized in the other provisions of this chapter and in the provisions of the Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992 (Public Law 102–511) so as to optimize the contribution such programs make to the national interests of the United States.

(Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title XII, §1209, Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1782.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Freedom for Russia and Emerging Eurasian Democracies and Open Markets Support Act of 1992, referred to in subsec. (d), is Pub. L. 102–511, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3320. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5801 of this title and Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 752.56

 759.26

 761.39

 761.93

 762.74

 764.26

 764.88

 765.02

 765.01

 764.76

 764.37

 763.88

 763.87

 764.58

 764.61

 764.48

 764.56

 764.58

 765.69

 770.23

 772.16

 777.20

 779.86

 780.95

 781.43

 781.60

 781.70

 781.98

 783.30

 784.91

 787.05

 2,715

 3,127

 3,264

 3,299

 3,353

 3,453

 3,495

 3,504

 3,504

 3,487

 3,461

 3,428

 3,427

 3,475

 3,477

 3,468

 3,474

 3,475

 3,550

 3,866

 4,005

 4,381

 4,588

 4,674

 4,713

 4,727

 4,735

 4,757

 4,864

 4,997

 5,175

STORAGE

+640

+412

+137

+35

+54

+100

+42

+9

+0

-17

-26

-33

-1

+48

+2

-9

+6

+1

+75

+316

+139

+376

+207

+86

+39

+14

+8

+22

+107

+133

+178

CHANGE

353

238

99

48

57

80

51

35

30

21

17

13

29

54

31

25

33

31

68

189

100

220

134

73

50

37

34

41

84

97

120

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 24, 2002

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +3,100 2,492 0 930

ACRE-FEET +3,100 4,943 0 1,845

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,845

 1,845

 2,075

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
§ 678.740 What funds are used to pay for infrastructure costs in the State one-stop infrastructure funding mechanism? ( a ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for WIOA title I programs, including Native American Programs described in part 684 of this chapter, may be paid using program funds, administrative funds, or both. Infrastructure costs for the Senior Community Service Employment Program under title V of the Older Americans Act (42 U.S.C. 3056 *et seq.*) may also be paid using program funds, administrative funds, or both.
( b ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for other required one-stop partner programs (listed in §§ 678.400 through 678.410) are limited to the program's administrative funds, as appropriate.
( c ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for the adult education program authorized by title II of WIOA must be paid from the funds that are available for local administration and may be paid from funds made available by the State or non-Federal resources that are cash, in-kind, or third-party contributions.
( d ) In the State funding mechanism, infrastructure costs for the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 must be paid from funds available for local administration of postsecondary level programs and activities to eligible recipients or consortia of eligible recipients and may be paid from funds made available by the State or non-Federal resources that are cash, in-kind, or third-party contributions.
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**I**, Michael L.Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of Intrusion Inc., certify that:

(1)         Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Intrusion Inc.:

(2)         Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)         Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

(4)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)    Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  November 13, 2006 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                          | Michael L. Paxton       |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Michael French, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of MDRNA, Inc. (MDRNA), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of MDRNA on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MDRNA.

Date: July 30, 2009



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    J. Michael French             
|Name:  |  | J. Michael French                    
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MDRNA and will be
retained by MDRNA and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by MDRNA for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
(No. 74-CC-126

#### Aero Mayflower Transit Co., Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Bureau of the Budget, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 17, 1973.*

Aero Mayflower Transit Co., Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR


We  hereby  consent  to  the  use  in  this  Pre-Effective  Amendment  No.  4 to
Registration  Statement  on Form S-1 of our reports  dated April 6, 1999 (except
for Note 13,  which is as of June 4,  1999),  April 1,  1998 and July 23,  1999,
relating  to the  financial  statements  of  Bostek,  Inc.  for the years  ended
December  31,  1998,  1997  and  1996,   respectively,   which  appear  in  such
Registration  Statement.  We also  consent  to the  references  to us under  the
heading "Experts" in such Registration Statement.


/s/ Di Pesa & Company

DI PESA & COMPANY
Certified Public Accountants
December 30, 1999