alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 668.210 What priority for designation is given to eligible organizations? ( a ) Federally-recognized Indian tribes, Alaska Native entities, or consortia that include a tribe or entity will have the highest priority for designation. To be designated, the organizations must meet the requirements in this subpart. These organizations will be designated for those geographic areas and/or populations over which they have legal jurisdiction. (WIA sec. 166(c)(1).)
( b ) If we decide not to designate Indian tribes or Alaska Native entities to serve their service areas, we will enter into arrangements to provide services with entities which the tribes or Alaska Native entities involved approve.
( c ) In geographic areas not served by Indian tribes or Alaska Native entities, entities with a Native American-controlled governing body and which are representative of the Native American community or communities involved will have priority for designation.
Meeting Note to Docket

Summary of Tasks and Next Steps 

For Tribal Environmental Professionals Workgroup

March 3, 2009

Discussion Topics

On March 3, 2009, a representative from the US Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) updated interested tribal environmental professionals on the status of the 

workgroup efforts regarding the rule titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications 

in Indian country.” The update included general concerns and issues related to this 

action, including: 

• Tribes participating in this workgroup would like that all enforcement authority 

related to this rule be delegated to them.

• Tribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA regional offices to develop 

general permits for gas stations, boilers, emergency generators, co-generators and 

oil and gas compressor stations.

• How tribes can collect fees for permitting. The workgroup had discussed that 

tribes can collect permit fees under an EPA-approved TIP. For those tribes who 

desire to administer a delegated New Source Review (NSR) program, these tribes 

can collect fees under their own authority not under federal authority.

• Developing a model delegation package. This package will include model 

regulatory language that tribes can use to request delegation of the federal NSR 

program. 

• Sources to permit first. Tribes participating in this workgroup are interested in 

permitting new sources first, particularly synthetic minors.

• Tribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to consider protecting 

cultural resources in permitting. 

• Tribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to register all existing 

sources on Indian country to help with the development of emissions inventories

• Tribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to explore how the Federal 

Air Rule for Reservations overlaps with this rule.

• Tribes participating in this workgroup would like EPA to explore how this rule 

will impact Tribes in the State of Oklahoma.
(No. 74-CC-476

#### Premium Instruments Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 2, 1974.*

Premium Instruments Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Edward L. S. Arkema, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
### §§255a, 255b. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections, act Feb. 15, 1938, ch. 29, §§1, 2, 52 Stat. 30, which related to protection for officers and buildings, jurisdiction of offenses and penalties, and permitted picketing, are of particular application to the District of Columbia.
September 2022

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE - FEET INFLOW RIVER EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

1,590.2

1 931.32 1,585.6 -4.6 1,781 3,958 0 0 130 0.30 0.00

2 931.09 1,582.2 -3.4 2,576 4,141 0 0 147 0.34 0.00

3 930.87 1,579.0 -3.2 2,206 3,647 0 0 190 0.44 0.00

4 930.67 1,576.1 -2.9 2,374 3,706 0 0 147 0.34 0.00

5 930.38 1,571.8 -4.3 1,946 3,939 0 0 151 0.35 0.00

6 929.99 1,566.1 -5.7 1,289 4,030 0 0 142 0.33 0.00

7 929.93 1,565.2 -0.9 2,601 2,913 0 0 129 0.30 0.00

8 929.80 1,563.3 -1.9 2,482 3,373 0 0 64 0.15 0.00

9 929.53 1,559.4 -3.9 2,061 3,873 0 0 171 0.40 0.00

10 929.35 1,556.8 -2.6 2,483 3,651 0 0 154 0.36 0.00

11 929.10 1,553.1 -3.6 2,470 4,187 0 0 120 0.28 0.00

12 928.88 1,549.9 -3.2 2,036 3,582 0 0 64 0.15 0.00

13 928.87 1,549.8 -0.1 3,139 3,084 0 0 128 0.30 0.00

14 928.63 1,546.3 -3.5 1,872 3,512 0 0 111 0.26 0.00

15 928.34 1,542.1 -4.2 1,666 3,697 0 0 85 0.20 0.00

16 928.10 1,538.6 -3.5 2,148 3,797 0 0 102 0.24 0.00

17 927.97 1,536.8 -1.9 3,009 3,863 0 0 93 0.22 0.00

18 927.79 1,534.2 -2.6 2,499 3,749 0 0 55 0.13 0.61

19 927.67 1,532.4 -1.7 2,794 3,651 0 0 13 0.03 0.60

20 927.51 1,530.1 -2.3 2,338 3,481 0 0 17 0.04 0.01

21 927.29 1,527.0 -3.2 2,228 3,760 0 0 63 0.15 0.00

22 927.10 1,524.3 -2.7 2,170 3,530 0 0 17 0.04 0.01

23 926.86 1,520.8 -3.4 1,698 3,414 0 0 17 0.04 0.00

24 926.89 1,521.2 0.4 3,636 3,264 0 0 156 0.37 0.00

25 926.83 1,520.4 -0.9 3,063 3,377 0 0 118 0.28 0.00

26 926.70 1,518.5 -1.9 3,368 4,216 0 0 88 0.21 0.00

27 926.69 1,518.4 -0.1 3,838 3,830 0 0 80 0.19 0.00

28 926.65 1,517.8 -0.6 3,573 3,760 0 0 101 0.24 0.00

29 926.50 1,515.7 -2.1 2,703 3,703 0 0 80 0.19 0.00

30 926.46 1,515.1 -0.6 3,616 3,841 0 0 63 0.15 0.00

TOTALS -75.1 75,663 110,529 0 0 2,996 7.02 1.23

ACRE-FEET -75,100 150,078 219,234 0 0 5,943

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 219,234 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total 219,234

Precipitation

This month = 1.23

October 01, 2021 To date = 42.58

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Shasta Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/19/2023
### §§264, 265. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 264, act Aug. 18, 1894, ch. 301, 28 Stat. 418, which related to Pan American Union, was superseded by Convention of 1928, ratified by the United States and providing that the government of Pan American Union should be vested in a governing board.

Section 265, act Jan. 25, 1929, ch. 102, title I, 45 Stat. 1102, which was from an appropriation act, related to disposition of receipts of Pan American Union, and was not repeated in subsequent appropriation acts.
- Page 1
- Page 2
- Page 3
- Page 4
- Page 5
- Page 6
- Page 7
- Page 8
- Page 9
- Page 10
- Page 11
- Page 12
- Page 13
- Page 14
- Page 15
- Page 16
- Page 17
- Page 18
- Page 19
- Page 20
- Page 21
- Page 22
- Page 23
- Page 24
- Page 25
- Page 26
- Page 27
- Page 28
- Page 29
- Page 30
- Page 31
- Page 32
- Page 33
- Page 34
- Page 35
- Page 36
- Page 37
- Page 38
- Page 39
- Page 40
- Page 41
- Page 42
- Page 43

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T07:05:23-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### Helen J. Kass et al., Individually and as Stockholders of Park Avenue Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, v. Park Avenue Improvement Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Doré and Callahan, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.1311 Required departure. ( a ) *Limit to worker's stay.* As defined further in DHS regulations, a temporary labor certification limits the authorized period of stay for an H-2A worker. *See* 8 CFR 214.2(h). A foreign worker may not remain beyond his or her authorized period of stay, as established by DHS, which is based upon the validity period of the labor certification under which the H-2A worker is employed, nor beyond separation from employment prior to completion of the H-2A contract, absent an extension or change of such worker's status under DHS regulations.
( b ) *Notice to worker.* Upon establishment of a program by DHS for registration of departure, an employer must notify any H-2A worker that when the worker departs the U.S. by land at the conclusion of employment as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the worker must register such departure at the place and in the manner prescribed by DHS.
### §4191. General application of provisions to consular officers

The various provisions of title 18 of the Revised Statutes which are expressed in terms of general application to any particular classes of consular officers, shall be deemed to apply as well to all other classes of such officers and to such other United States citizen employees of the Department of State as may be designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe, so far as may be consistent with the subject matter of the same and with the treaties of the United States.

(R.S. §1689; Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. B, title XXII, §2222(b), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–818.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Title 18 of the Revised Statutes, referred to in text, was in the original "this Title", meaning title 18 of the Revised Statutes, consisting of R.S. §§1674 to 1752, and insofar as classified to the Code, is classified to sections 4191, 4193 to 4197, 4200, 4202, 4204, 4205, 4207 to 4214, and 4216 to 4221 of this title. For complete classification of R.S. §§1674 to 1752 to the Code, see Tables.

#### Codification

R.S. §1689 derived from act Aug. 18, 1856, ch. 127, §31, 11 Stat. 64.

Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 1171 of this title, and prior thereto to section 53 of this title.

#### Amendments

1998—Pub. L. 105–277 inserted "and to such other United States citizen employees of the Department of State as may be designated by the Secretary of State pursuant to such regulations as the Secretary may prescribe" after "such officers".
#### § 670.994 How does Job Corps resolve disputes between DOL and other Federal Agencies?

Disputes between DOL and a Federal Agency operating a center will be handled according to the interagency agreement with the agency which is operating the center.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7220

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DENNIS LEE ROSE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-89-70-B, CA-94-648-R)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 17, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennis Lee Rose, Appellant Pro Se. Julie Marie Campbell, Assistant

United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* In denying relief on Appellant's motion, the district court

granted Appellee's motion to dismiss filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12(b)(6). Where, as in this case, the district court considered

matters outside the pleadings, it should have treated the Rule

12(b)(6) motion as a motion for summary judgment. See Gay v. Wall, 761 F.2d 175, 177 (4th Cir. 1985). Any error was harmless because

Appellant received the necessary notice pursuant to Roseboro v.

Garrison, 528 F.2d 309, 310 (4th Cir. 1975).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v.

Rose, Nos. CR-89-70-B; CA-94-648-R (W.D. Va. May 5, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE TRUST 2005-B-SS**

March 15, 2006

 
| Capital  One Auto Finance Trust 2005-B-SSc/o Wilmington Trust Company1100 North Market StreetRodney Square North, Wilmington, Delaware 19890 |   | Standard &  Poor’s Ratings Services55 Water StreetNew York, New York 10041 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| JPMorgan  Chase Bank, N.A.4 New York Plaza, 6th FloorNew York, New York 10004-2477                                                           |   | Moody’s  Investors Service, Inc.99 Church StreetNew York, New York 10007       |
| Fitch, Inc.One State Street Plaza, 32nd FloorNew York, New York 10004                                                                   |   |                                                                                     |

 

This Officer’s Certificate is being issued inaccordance with Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated asof June 2, 2005 as amended or supplemented (the “Agreement”) by and among CapitalOne Auto Finance Trust 2005-B-SS, as Issuer, Capital One Auto Receivables, LLC,as Seller, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank) asIndenture Trustee and Capital One Auto Finance, Inc., as Servicer (the “Servicer”).Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed thereto inthe Agreement.

 

Byhis or her signature below, the undersigned officer of the Servicer, certifiesthat effective as of December 31, 2005:

 

(a)                      a review of the activities of the Servicerduring the calendar year ended on December 31, 2005 (or such shorterperiod as may be applicable) and of performance under the Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

(b)                     to the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Servicer has performed in all material respects its obligationsunder the Agreement throughout the calendar year ended on December 31, 2005(or such shorter period as may be applicable).

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I haveexecuted this Officer’s Certificate as of the date first above written.

 
|   | CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE, INC.,  as Servicer |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                              |
|   | By:                                               | /s/ Steve Richter |   |
|   | Name:                                             | Steve Richter |
|   | Title:                                            | Assistant Vice President |

 

----
### §3871. Annual report

Until the termination of the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977, the President shall report annually on the status of the exercise of the rights and responsibilities of the United States under that Treaty. Such report shall include a discussion of the following:

(1) The actions taken by the Government of the Republic of Panama with respect to the living conditions of persons who resided in the Canal Zone before October 1, 1979, and who continue to reside in those areas made available to the United States under the Agreement in Implementation of Article III of the Panama Canal Treaty.

(2) The terms, conditions, and charges for land-use licenses within the canal operating areas specified in the Agreement in Implementation of Article III of the Panama Canal Treaty.

(3) The condition of former employees (and their dependents) of the Panama Canal Company and the Canal Zone Government who reside in the Republic of Panama on or after October 1, 1979.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title III, §3301, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 497.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Report to Congress on Condition of Panama Canal and Canal Operations

Pub. L. 100–203, title V, §5418, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1330–271, provided that out of the funds authorized to be appropriated by part 1 (§§5411 to 5418) of subtitle E of title V of Pub. L. 100–203, the Panama Canal Commission was to prepare and submit to Congress a report on the condition of the Panama Canal and potential adverse effects on United States shipping and commerce and report on the effect on canal operations of certain Panamanian Government and military actions.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions vested in President by this section delegated to Secretary of State who shall perform such function in coordination with Secretary of Defense pursuant to section 1–401 of Ex. Ord. No. 12215, May 27, 1980, 45 F.R. 36044, set out as a note under section 3601 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 904.36

 903.87

 903.33

 902.80

 902.23

 901.51

 900.99

 900.55

 900.13

 899.64

 899.30

 898.92

 898.75

 898.33

 897.93

 897.53

 897.18

 896.63

 896.09

 895.60

 895.20

 894.96

 894.65

 894.28

 894.02

 893.58

 893.20

 892.66

 892.23

 892.01

 1,220.9

 1,214.8

 1,208.2

 1,201.7

 1,194.8

 1,186.1

 1,179.8

 1,174.5

 1,169.4

 1,163.6

 1,159.5

 1,154.9

 1,152.9

 1,147.9

 1,143.1

 1,138.4

 1,134.3

 1,127.8

 1,121.4

 1,115.7

 1,111.1

 1,108.3

 1,104.7

 1,100.4

 1,097.4

 1,092.3

 1,088.0

 1,081.8

 1,076.9

 1,074.4

STORAGE

-5.8

-6.0

-6.6

-6.5

-6.9

-8.7

-6.3

-5.3

-5.0

-5.9

-4.1

-4.6

-2.0

-5.0

-4.8

-4.7

-4.1

-6.5

-6.3

-5.7

-4.7

-2.8

-3.6

-4.3

-3.0

-5.1

-4.4

-6.2

-4.9

-2.5

CHANGE

 1,968

 2,183

 2,364

 2,163

 2,287

 1,405

 2,587

 3,147

 2,595

 2,276

 3,328

 2,516

 3,712

 2,405

 2,640

 2,316

 2,620

 1,999

 2,006

 1,680

 2,529

 2,851

 2,823

 2,879

 2,930

 1,527

 2,400

 1,918

 2,592

 3,169

INFLOW

 4,786

 5,123

 5,609

 5,348

 5,686

 5,683

 5,635

 5,686

 5,058

 5,186

 5,311

 4,718

 4,632

 4,821

 4,925

 4,605

 4,614

 5,157

 5,204

 4,561

 4,743

 4,151

 4,574

 4,933

 4,345

 4,002

 4,537

 5,024

 4,980

 4,353

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 109

 105

 94

 83

 100

 121

 121

 124

 78

 56

 74

 94

 101

 108

 115

 97

 93

 107

 0

 3

 137

 109

 58

 105

 102

 74

 64

 7

 84

 80

C.F.S.

 .30

 .29

 .26

 .23

 .28

 .34

 .34

 .35

 .22

 .16

 .21

 .27

 .29

 .31

 .33

 .28

 .27

 .31

 .00

 .01

 .40

 .32

 .17

 .31

 .30

 .22

 .19

 .02

 .25

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2021 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 8, 2021

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -152.3 73,815 147,990 0 0 2,603 7.47 .61

ACRE-FEET -152,300 146,412 293,538 0 0 5,163

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 293,538

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 293,538

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .61

JULY 1, 2021 .74

 1,226.7

Table 3

OCT 1, 2020 TO DATE = 24.27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-3-1999
<CASH>                                             941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,158
<INVENTORY>                                     17,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,965
<PP&E>                                          12,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  58,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,347
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           157
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    58,341
<SALES>                                         16,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,502
<CGS>                                           13,838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   439
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,211)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (813)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,398)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,398)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEvaluation parameters for the alkaline fuel cell oxygen electrodeStudies were made of Pt- and Au-catalyzed porous electrodes, designed for the cathode of the alkaline H2/O2 fuel cell, employing cyclic voltammetry and the floating half-cell method. The purpose was to obtain parameters from the cyclic voltammograms which could predict performance in the fuel cell. It was found that a satisfactory relationship between these two types of measurement could not be established; however, useful observations were made of relative performance of several types of carbon used as supports for noble metal catalysts and of some Au catalysts. The best half-cell performance with H2/O2 in a 35 percent KOH electrolyte at 80 C was given by unsupported fine particle Au on Teflon; this electrode is used in the Orbiter fuel cell.Document ID19860002801Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSinger, J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Srinivasan, V.*(Bowling Green State Univ. Ohio, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1985Subject CategoryInorganic And Physical ChemistryReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:87155E-2669NASA-TM-87155Accession Number86N12268Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-41-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19860002801.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024