alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 939

 1,012

 919

 1,005

 1,103

 1,074

 958

 836

 857

 910

 838

 1,019

 1,114

 1,204

 1,293

 1,239

 1,143

 1,024

 1,067

 955

 940

 814

 768

 806

 934

 1,034

 1,284

 1,203

 1,184

 1,044

 236

 275

 317

 289

 378

 310

 234

 234

 384

 264

 348

 317

 377

 321

 302

 320

 265

 250

 251

 246

 249

 224

 270

 365

 349

 367

 329

 215

 238

 227

 604

 603

 623

 631

 697

 688

 609

 574

 648

 582

 581

 597

 677

 714

 700

 689

 660

 616

 607

 598

 575

 516

 519

 572

 603

 649

 691

 669

 636

 599

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 1, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 66 64 65 62.3 58.0 60.3 10.0 9.5 9.8

2 67 66 66 63.3 59.2 61.3 9.7 9.3 9.6

3 69 66 67 64.3 59.4 62.0 9.6 9.2 9.4

4 68 67 68 66.2 61.4 63.7 9.4 8.9 9.2

5 70 68 69 65.1 62.8 64.1 9.4 9.0 9.3

6 79 67 69 63.8 61.0 62.5 9.3 9.0 9.2

7 66 21 63 62.1 59.5 61.1 10.2 9.1 9.7

8 69 64 66 60.7 57.8 59.2 10.2 10.0 10.1

9 67 65 66 59.6 56.3 58.0 10.3 10.1 10.2

10 71 65 67 60.4 56.1 58.1 10.2 9.8 10.0

11 70 68 69 61.9 57.0 59.4 10.2 9.8 9.9

12 68 17 64 62.4 58.1 60.4 10.2 9.8 10.0

13 66 64 65 62.7 58.6 60.8 10.1 10.0 10.1

14 67 64 65 65.5 60.1 62.8 10.1 9.4 9.8

15 69 65 67 68.2 63.1 65.6 9.4 8.9 9.2

16 72 66 68 68.7 64.3 66.5 9.3 8.8 9.0

17 70 66 68 68.4 63.7 66.2 9.4 8.8 9.0

18 70 66 68 69.2 64.2 66.8 9.4 8.7 9.0

19 70 67 68 70.5 66.0 68.2 9.2 8.6 8.8

20 72 67 69 68.4 64.5 66.7 9.3 8.5 8.9

21 73 66 69 68.1 63.3 65.8 9.5 8.7 9.1

22 73 67 69 68.2 63.4 65.9 9.5 8.9 9.1

23 76 67 70 69.1 64.3 66.9 9.5 8.7 9.0

24 84 68 75 70.6 65.8 68.2 9.3 8.5 8.8

25 75 68 70 70.0 66.7 68.4 9.2 8.4 8.8

26 69 67 68 67.6 64.7 66.4 9.4 8.8 9.1

27 70 67 68 65.5 62.6 64.2 9.7 9.2 9.4

28 69 67 68 65.6 62.0 63.7 9.8 9.4 9.5

29 71 68 69 65.5 61.7 63.8 9.7 9.4 9.5

30 69 68 69 65.1 61.5 63.4 9.7 9.4 9.5

31 70 68 69 65.2 61.0 63.2 9.8 9.4 9.6

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: May 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.728 Penalty period: Second failure to report. ( a ) *Second penalty period.* The second penalty period begins on the day after the first penalty period ends. The second penalty period ends on the day we first learn that you should have made a required report, but did not do so within 10 days after the close of the month in which the event happened. (The event may have happened during the first penalty period, with the reporting due date in the second penalty period. The due date and the failure to report on time are the important factors in establishing a penalty period.) There may be more than one required report overdue at the end of the second penalty period, but we will impose no more than one penalty deduction for the period.
( b ) *Extension of second penalty period.* If you have good cause for not making a report on time (see § 416.732), we will extend the second penalty period to the day when we learn that you should have made another required report, but did not do so within 10 days after the close of the month in which the event happened. There may be more than one required report overdue at the end of the extended second penalty period, but we will impose no more than one penalty deduction for the extended period.
[46 FR 5873, Jan. 21, 1981, as amended at 50 FR 48573, Nov. 26, 1985]
§ 652.215 What staffing models must be used to deliver services in the Employment Service? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary requires that States deliver the labor exchange services described in § 652.3 using State merit-staff employees employed according to the merit-system principles described in 5 CFR part 900, subpart F—Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration. This requirement also applies to the provision of services and activities under parts 653 and 658 of this chapter.
( b ) States authorized prior to February 5, 2020, to use a staffing model other than that described in paragraph (a) of this section to deliver ES services may use the staffing model consistent with the model previously authorized for the State. These States may use merit-staffing flexibility only to the same extent that the Department had authorized it prior to February 5, 2020.
( c ) States using staffing models under paragraph (b) of this section are required to participate in evaluations of their delivery of ES services conducted by the Department.
( d ) All States must comply with the requirements in this section no later than January 22, 2026.
[88 FR 82726, Nov. 24, 2023]
### §821. Repealed. Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159

Section, act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title II, §201, 60 Stat. 1000, set forth provisions relating to appointment and duties of Director General.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Feb. 15, 1981, except as otherwise provided, see section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
493 P.2d 958

#### Velda HOLCOMB et al., Petitioners, v. William POWER, Jr., Respondent.

No. 9414.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Feb. 9, 1972.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 734, 83 N.M. 496, 493 P.2d 981, be .and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.835 How will the administrative law judge conduct the proceeding? ( a ) Upon receipt of a timely request for a hearing filed pursuant to and in accordance with § 655.820 of this part, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall promptly appoint an administrative law judge to hear the case.
( b ) Within 7 calendar days following the assignment of the case, the administrative law judge shall notify all interested parties of the date, time and place of the hearing. All parties shall be given at least fourteen calendar days notice of such hearing.
( c ) The date of the hearing shall be not more than 60 calendar days from the date of the Administrator's determination. Because of the time constraints imposed by the INA, no request for postponement shall be granted except for compelling reasons. Even where such reasons are shown, no request for postponement of the hearing beyond the 60-day deadline shall be granted except by consent of all the parties to the proceeding.
( d ) The administrative law judge may prescribe a schedule by which the parties are permitted to file a prehearing brief or other written statement of fact or law. Any such brief or statement shall be served upon each other party in accordance with § 655.830 of this part. Posthearing briefs will not be permitted except at the request of the administrative law judge. When permitted, any such brief shall be limited to the issue or issues specified by the administrative law judge, shall be due within the time prescribed by the administrative law judge, and shall be served on each other party in accordance with § 655.830 of this part.
#### Rose Kaufman, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries. Judgment dismissing the complaint reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. The dismissal by the trial court “on the merits” before the close of plaintiff’s evidence was error (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482); and the judgment thereupon entered, incorrectly reciting that the motion to dismiss was granted “ at the close of the case ”, and not providing that the dismissal was “ without prejudice” must be reversed. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 482; *Hollenbeck*v. *Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.,*215 App. Div. 609, affd. 243 H. Y. 540; *Assalone*v. *Hazel,*243 App, Div. 176.) The judgment entered was not a default judgment. *(Citizens Trust Co.*v. *Prescott & Son, Inc.,*221 App. Div. 426.) Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.
# app1

# app2

# app3

# app4
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

            Dental/Medical Diagnostic Systems, Inc. and Subsidiaries
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 1997 and Thirteen Weeks Ended June 1, 1996



STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET INCOME PER SHARE WAS                            Three Months Ended  Thirteen Weeks Ended
CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS:                                March 31, 1997       June 1, 1996
                                                      --------------       ------------
<S>                                                    <C>                <C>         
Primary:

Net Income (loss)                                      $    47,150        $   (39,990)

Weighted average common shares outstanding               2,985,537          2,672,519

Incremental shares under stock options computed
  under the treasury stock method using the
  average market price of the issuer's commons
  stock during the period                                  460,342               --

Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares outstanding                                       3,445,879          2,672,519

Net income (loss) per share                            $       .01        $      (.01)

Fully diluted:

Net income (loss)                                      $    47,150        $   (39,990)

Weighted average common shares outstanding               2,985,537          2,672,519

Incremental shares under stock options computed
  under the treasury stock method using the
  market price of the issuer's common stock at
  the end of the period of higher than the
  average market price                                     465,820               --

Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares outstanding                                       3,451,357          2,672,519

Net Income (loss) per share                            $       .01        $      (.01)
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                         <C>                 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                       SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                              13,087,618
<SECURITIES>                                                           632,360
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       19,568,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           272,427
<INVENTORY>                                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    39,387,922
<PP&E>                                                              13,956,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       5,888,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      56,444,410
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                               25,684,729
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                89,385
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                          23,218,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        56,444,410
<SALES>                                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    74,663,459
<CGS>                                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       70,694,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        41,156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     151,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      5,399,288
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         1,964,973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  3,434,315
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         3,434,315
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                           .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                           .22
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-8035

JAMES MUHAMMAD, a/k/a Ahmad Muhammad-Ali,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS; CHIEF MCCLEASE,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-04513-MGL)

Submitted: March 17, 2016 Decided: March 22, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Muhammad, a state pretrial detainee, seeks to appeal 

the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the 

magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Muhammad has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 447.00

 446.27

 445.36

 444.83

 444.33

 443.59

 442.74

 441.89

 441.14

 440.63

 440.24

 439.61

 439.32

 439.46

 439.72

 440.14

 439.93

 439.13

 438.28

 437.44

 436.73

 436.94

 437.25

 437.35

 437.35

 437.54

 438.07

 438.65

 439.45

 440.25

 942,676

 935,521

 926,628

 921,461

 916,596

 909,412

 901,183

 892,980

 885,763

 880,866

 877,128

 871,101

 868,331

 869,668

 872,152

 876,170

 874,161

 866,518

 858,423

 850,449

 843,728

 845,714

 848,649

 849,596

 849,596

 851,397

 856,427

 861,944

 869,572

 877,224

STORAGE

-3,633

-7,155

-8,893

-5,167

-4,865

-7,184

-8,229

-8,203

-7,217

-4,897

-3,738

-6,027

-2,770

+1,337

+2,484

+4,018

-2,009

-7,643

-8,095

-7,974

-6,721

+1,986

+2,935

+947

+0

+1,801

+5,030

+5,517

+7,628

+7,652

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,195

1,520

2,390

0

0

0

0

0

1,593

1,593

717

20

0

2,651

3,197

4,092

3,824

PUMPING

 1,659

 3,620

 4,354

 2,400

 2,395

 3,518

 4,157

 4,079

 3,412

 2,374

 1,780

 1,475

 1,180

 0

 0

 0

 1,475

 3,589

 3,925

 4,008

 3,346

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 148

 173

 158

 158

 167

 160

 151

 156

 161

 155

 150

 160

 135

 151

 132

 133

 128

 113

 84

 98

 99

 104

 104

 102

 101

 97

 84

 83

 84

 158

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-25

+186

+29

-47

+109

+56

+159

+100

-66

+59

+46

-1,403

-82

-370

-136

-232

+590

-151

-72

+85

+56

-488

-9

-138

+81

+1,005

-31

-332

-163

+192

OR

 48

 51

 63

 47

 53

 57

 53

 47

 53

 40

 53

 47

 40

 43

 50

 53

 47

 9

 31

 46

 80

 31

 40

 24

 40

 92

 12

 9

 34

 9

C.F.S.

 .15

 .16

 .21

 .15

 .17

 .18

 .17

 .15

 .17

 .13

 .17

 .15

 .13

 .14

 .16

 .17

 .15

 .03

 .10

 .15

 .26

 .10

 .13

 .08

 .13

 .30

 .04

 .03

 .11

 .03

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .41

 .05

 .01

 .02

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR January 28, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

NOVEMBER 2019 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -69,085 22,792 52,746 3,887 0 -992 1,302 4.20 .49

ACRE-FEET -69,085 45,208 104,622 7,710 0 -1,968 2,583

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 104,622

PACHECO TUNNEL 7,710 TOTAL 112,332

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE = .49

 946,309

SPILL 0 .49

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = .49
§ 661.250 What are the requirements for designation of local workforce investment areas? ( a ) The Governor must designate local workforce investment areas in order for the State to receive funding under title I of WIA.
( b ) The Governor must take into consideration the factors described in WIA section 116(a)(1)(B) in making designations of local areas. Such designation must be made in consultation with the State Board, and after consultation with chief elected officials. The Governor must also consider comments received through the public comment process described in the State workforce investment plan under § 661.220(d).
( c ) The Governor may approve a request for designation as a workforce investment area from any unit of general local government, including a combination of such units, if the State Board determines that the area meets the requirements of WIA section 116(a)(1)(B) and recommends designation.
( d ) The Governor of any State that was a single service delivery area State under the Job Training Partnership Act as of July 1, 1998, and only those States, may designate the State as a single local workforce investment area State. (WIA sec.116.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <ARTICLE>  9
<CIK> 0000737210
<NAME> LNB BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          27,897
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,077
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     79,193
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          47,627
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            45,112
<LOANS>                                        449,977
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,184
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 625,987
<DEPOSITS>                                     500,320
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,540
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,138
<LONG-TERM>                                     32,345
<COMMON>                                         4,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,332
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 625,987
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 28,751
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,530
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   171
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                34,452
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,629
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,971
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,481
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,250
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,253
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,253
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,261
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.83
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,702
<LOANS-PAST>                                       197
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  4,241
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,667
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      895
<RECOVERIES>                                       162
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,184
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,066
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,118



</TABLE>
### §3312. Rules and regulations

The President is authorized to prescribe such rules and regulations as he may deem appropriate to carry out the purposes of this chapter. During the three-year period beginning on January 1, 1979, such rules and regulations shall be transmitted promptly to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate. Such action shall not, however, relieve the Institute of the responsibilities placed upon it by this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–8, §13, Apr. 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 20.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective as of January 1, 1979, see section 18 of Pub. L. 96–8, set out as a note under section 3301 of this title.
§ 411.330 How will SSA evaluate an EN's performance? ( a ) We will periodically review the results of the work of each EN to ensure effective quality assurance in the provision of services by ENs.
( b ) In conducting such a review, we will solicit and consider the views of the individuals the EN serves and the PM which monitors the EN.
( c ) ENs must make the results of these periodic reviews available to disabled beneficiaries to assist them in choosing among available ENs.