alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.76

 130.98

 130.78

 130.71

 130.80

 130.77

 130.86

 130.72

 130.84

 130.76

 130.71

 130.94

 130.84

 130.88

 130.70

 130.76

 130.90

 130.64

 130.67

 130.65

 130.72

 130.80

 130.72

 130.77

 130.71

 130.98

 131.00

 130.82

 130.85

 130.84

 130.81

 663

 688

 665

 657

 667

 664

 674

 658

 671

 663

 657

 683

 671

 676

 656

 663

 678

 649

 652

 650

 658

 667

 658

 664

 657

 688

 690

 669

 673

 671

 668

STORAGE

+38

+25

-23

-8

+10

-3

+10

-16

+13

-8

-6

+26

-12

+5

-20

+7

+15

-29

+3

-2

+8

+9

-9

+6

-7

+31

+2

-21

+4

-2

-3

CHANGE

630

569

489

507

539

543

557

584

582

537

528

513

477

496

532

552

531

514

537

555

575

516

440

419

419

440

434

440

458

445

430

INFLOW

 37

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

PUTAH

 573

 521

 466

 476

 499

 510

 517

 557

 540

 506

 496

 464

 448

 458

 506

 513

 488

 494

 500

 521

 536

 476

 410

 381

 388

 389

 398

 416

 421

 411

 397

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .28

 .41

 .33

 .40

 .42

 .30

 .33

 .33

 .38

 .43

 .38

 .45

 .34

 .30

 .44

 .28

 .35

 .34

 .35

 .30

 .43

 .21

 .28

 .25

 .32

 .38

 .33

 .29

 .29

 .23

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2003 RUN DATE: 09/25/2003

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +43 15,788 14,676 1,057 33 10.41 .28

ACRE-FEET +43 31,315 29,110 2,097 65

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,097

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 29,110

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .28

JULY 1, 2003 .28

 625

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 of Champion Enterprises, Inc. of our report dated February
5, 1999 relating to the financial statements, which appears in Champion
Enterprises, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2,
1999. We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts" and
"Selected Financial Data" in such Registration Statement.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Detroit, Michigan

July 28, 1999
### §3974. Border equalization pay adjustment

#### (a) In general

An employee who regularly commutes from the employee's place of residence in the continental United States to an official duty station in Canada or Mexico shall receive a border equalization pay adjustment equal to the amount of comparability payments under section 5304 of title 5 that the employee would receive if the employee were assigned to an official duty station within the United States locality pay area closest to the employee's official duty station.

#### (b) Employee defined

For purposes of this section, the term "employee" means a person who—

(1) is an "employee" as defined under section 2105 of title 5; and

(2) is employed by the Department of State, the United States Agency for International Development, or the International Joint Commission of the United States and Canada (established under Article VII of the treaty signed January 11, 1909) (36 Stat. 2448), except that the term shall not include members of the Service (as specified in section 3903 of this title).

#### (c) Treatment as basic pay

An equalization pay adjustment paid under this section shall be considered to be part of basic pay for the same purposes for which comparability payments are considered to be part of basic pay under section 5304 of title 5.

#### (d) Regulations

The heads of the agencies referred to in subsection (b)(2) may prescribe regulations to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §414, as added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(7) [div. A, title III, §333(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–439.)
§ 683.730 When can the Secretary waive the imposition of sanctions? ( a ) ( 1 ) A recipient of title I funds may request that the Secretary waive the imposition of sanctions authorized under WIOA sec. 184.
( 2 ) A Grant officer may approve the waiver described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section if the grant officer finds that the recipient has demonstrated substantial compliance with the requirements of WIOA sec. 184(d)(2).
( b ) ( 1 ) When the debt for which a waiver request was established in a non-Federal resolution proceeding, the resolution report must accompany the waiver request.
( 2 ) When the waiver request is made during the ETA Grant Officer resolution process, the request must be made during the informal resolution period described in § 683.440(c).
( c ) A waiver of the recipient's liability must be considered by the Grant Officer only when: ( 1 ) The misexpenditure of WIOA funds occurred at a subrecipient's level;
( 2 ) The misexpenditure was not due to willful disregard of the requirements of title I of WIOA, gross negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of administration, and did not constitute fraud or failure to make the required disclosures in accordance with 2 CFR 200.113 addressing all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery or gratuity violations (2 CFR part 180 and 31 U.S.C. 3321)
( 3 ) If fraud did exist, was perpetrated against the recipient/subrecipients, and: ( i ) The recipient/subrecipients discovered, investigated, reported, and cooperated in any prosecution of the perpetrator of the fraud; and
( ii ) After aggressive debt collection action, it has been documented that further attempts at debt collection from the perpetrator of the fraud would be inappropriate or futile;
( 4 ) The recipient has issued a final determination which disallows the misexpenditure, the recipient's appeal process has been exhausted, and a debt has been established; and
( 5 ) The recipient provides documentation to demonstrate that it has substantially complied with the requirements of WIOA sec. 184(d)(2) and this section.
( d ) The recipient will not be released from liability for misspent funds under the determination required by WIOA sec. 184(d) unless the Grant Officer determines that further collection action, either by the recipient or subrecipient(s), would be inappropriate or would prove futile.
STORAGE - A.F. CHANGE SHASTA NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV

IRON

CANYON PIT 6 PIT 7

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S

RIVER 

C.F.S

NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 34,057 14,284 10,736 9,807 22,845 91,728 2,107 1,062 5,465 6,527 2,031.1

2 33,779 14,329 10,963 13,411 23,041 95,523 3,795 1,913 3,768 5,681 2,042.4

3 34,368 14,471 11,805 13,192 27,670 101,507 5,984 3,017 2,540 5,557 2,053.4

4 34,529 14,750 12,250 12,223 31,537 105,289 3,782 1,907 3,881 5,788 2,064.9

5 34,119 14,988 11,671 15,000 32,048 107,826 2,537 1,279 6,075 7,354 2,079.5

6 33,733 15,039 11,474 14,578 31,713 106,537 -1,289 -650 7,376 6,726 2,092.8

7 34,358 15,087 11,416 11,995 31,061 103,917 -2,620 -1,321 8,467 7,146 2,107.0

8 34,267 14,949 10,109 14,558 31,517 105,400 1,483 748 7,906 8,654 2,124.2

9 33,930 14,690 9,335 14,045 30,879 102,879 -2,521 -1,271 11,151 9,880 2,143.8

10 33,642 14,324 8,291 13,058 29,097 98,412 -4,467 -2,252 14,530 12,278 2,168.1

11 33,798 14,010 9,637 12,769 29,539 99,753 1,341 676 10,280 10,956 2,189.9

12 34,094 14,044 10,612 13,017 30,247 102,014 2,261 1,140 10,887 12,027 2,213.7

13 34,467 14,556 11,327 14,502 32,535 107,387 5,373 2,709 36,187 38,896 2,290.9

14 36,866 16,541 12,086 14,157 32,462 112,113 4,726 2,383 73,762 76,145 2,441.9

15 38,479 18,139 10,853 14,381 29,757 111,608 -505 -255 48,729 48,474 2,538.1

16 39,069 18,861 9,370 13,481 32,183 112,964 1,356 684 29,768 30,452 2,598.5

17 39,108 19,098 7,959 14,161 32,210 112,537 -427 -215 25,240 25,025 2,648.1

18 38,449 18,899 6,475 14,497 28,690 107,010 -5,527 -2,786 24,797 22,011 2,691.8

19 37,917 18,510 5,201 15,245 26,971 103,844 -3,166 -1,596 28,900 27,304 2,745.9

20 37,502 18,012 4,094 15,263 28,507 103,378 -466 -235 30,879 30,644 2,806.7

21 36,911 17,398 3,984 14,809 25,833 98,935 -4,443 -2,240 25,424 23,184 2,852.7

22 36,435 16,849 5,680 14,843 26,858 100,665 1,730 872 18,854 19,726 2,891.8

23 36,459 16,499 7,457 14,517 29,843 104,775 4,110 2,072 16,352 18,424 2,928.3

24 36,127 16,364 8,970 14,173 28,773 104,407 -368 -186 16,703 16,517 2,961.1

25 35,687 16,261 8,768 14,686 27,713 103,115 -1,292 -651 15,076 14,425 2,989.7

26 35,434 16,104 8,686 14,188 28,274 102,686 -429 -216 13,527 13,311 3,016.1

27 35,272 15,887 8,347 13,614 29,156 102,276 -410 -207 12,880 12,673 3,041.3

28 35,262 15,730 8,997 14,812 27,731 102,532 256 129 16,903 17,032 3,075.0

29 3,499 15,730 10,465 14,735 29,090 73,518 -29,014 -14,628 15,127 499 3,076.0

30 34,608 15,727 10,040 13,338 31,025 104,738 31,220 15,740 14,428 30,168 3,135.9

31 34,840 9,490 15,687 13,255 29,667 102,939 -1,799 -907 15,125 14,218 3,164.1

Totals 13,318 577,702

Acre - Feet 1,145,872

* October 1, 2022 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At Shasta Dam

Run Date: 4/19/2023

March 2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 7,072

 7,287

 6,994

 6,757

 5,901

 5,458

 5,559

 5,413

 5,414

 5,356

 4,588

 4,869

 4,726

 4,407

 4,698

 4,403

 4,432

 4,229

 4,430

 3,911

 3,839

 3,678

 3,779

 3,745

 3,764

 3,669

 3,632

 4,558

 3,450

 3,493

 3,555

 184,961

 182,432

 180,233

 177,865

 175,391

 172,228

 168,801

 165,642

 162,502

 159,521

 156,633

 153,160

 150,127

 147,111

 143,942

 141,208

 138,330

 135,624

 132,860

 130,426

 127,620

 124,886

 122,136

 119,619

 117,196

 114,912

 112,652

 110,470

 109,276

 107,090

 105,054

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: August 3, 2011

 192,033

 189,719

 187,227

 184,622

 181,292

 177,686

 174,360

 171,055

 167,916

 164,877

 161,221

 158,029

 154,853

 151,518

 148,640

 145,611

 142,762

 139,853

 137,290

 134,337

 131,459

 128,564

 125,915

 123,364

 120,960

 118,581

 116,284

 115,028

 112,726

 110,583

 108,609

 6,491,000

 6,470,000

 6,449,000

 6,427,000

 6,406,000

 6,385,000

 6,363,000

 6,342,000

 6,321,000

 6,300,000

 6,278,000

 6,257,000

 6,236,000

 6,214,000

 6,193,000

 6,172,000

 6,150,000

 6,129,000

 6,108,000

 6,086,000

 6,065,000

 6,044,000

 6,022,000

 6,001,000

 5,980,000

 5,959,000

 5,937,000

 5,916,000

 5,895,000

 5,873,000

 5,852,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 194,696
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsApplication of the Brinkley Dynamic Response Criterion to Spacecraft Transient Dynamic EventsNo abstract availableDocument ID20170005913Acquisition SourceJohnson Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSomers, Jeffrey T.*(Wyle Science, Technology and Engineering Group Houston, TX, United States)*Gohmert, Dustin*(NASA Headquarters Washington, DC United States)*Brinkley, James W.*(Brinkley (James W.) Independent Consultant United States)*Date AcquiredJune 29, 2017Publication DateMarch 1, 2017Subject CategorySpace Transportation And SafetyAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberJSC-CN-39266NASA/TM-2013-217380-REV1Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20170005913.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(No. 74-CC-468

#### Huston-Patterson Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Illinois State Museum, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 25, 1974.*

Huston-Patterson Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1361.1 

CA 13-00041 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

FIVE STAR BANK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARK LEWANDOWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

WESTERN NEW YORK LAW CENTER, BUFFALO (KEISHA A. WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WOODS OVIATT GILMAN LLP, ROCHESTER (F. MICHAEL OSTRANDER OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M.

Curran, J.), entered April 13, 2012. The order denied the application

of defendant Mark Lewandowski for a residential foreclosure settlement

conference and directed that plaintiff may proceed with this

foreclosure action. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant Mark Lewandowski appeals from an order

that denied his application for a residential foreclosure settlement

conference pursuant to CPLR 3408 and allowed plaintiff to proceed with

this foreclosure action. It is undisputed, however, that the mortgage

has now been foreclosed and the property has since been sold to a

third-party buyer. Thus, as a result of the sale, this appeal has

been rendered moot inasmuch as no purpose would be served by a

settlement conference at this time (see generally Homeowners Assn. of

Victoria Woods, III v Incarnato, 4 AD3d 814, 815). 

Entered: February 14, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
§ 681.430 May youth participate in both the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) youth and adult programs concurrently, and how do local program operators track concurrent enrollment in the WIOA youth and adult programs? ( a ) Yes, individuals who meet the respective program eligibility requirements may participate in adult and youth programs concurrently. Such individuals must be eligible under the youth or adult eligibility criteria applicable to the services received. Local program operators may determine, for these individuals, the appropriate level and balance of services under the youth and adult programs.
( b ) Local program operators must identify and track the funding streams which pay the costs of services provided to individuals who are participating in youth and adult programs concurrently, and ensure no duplication of services.
( c ) Individuals who meet the respective program eligibility requirements for WIOA youth title I and title II may participate in title I youth and title II concurrently.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 731.95

 732.02

 732.05

 732.09

 732.26

 732.33

 732.45

 732.55

 732.67

 732.70

 732.71

 732.76

 732.75

 732.81

 732.92

 732.91

 732.90

 732.93

 732.95

 732.98

 733.00

 733.02

 733.02

 733.02

 733.01

 732.99

 732.96

 732.96

 732.96

 732.98

 1,659

 1,662

 1,663

 1,665

 1,672

 1,676

 1,681

 1,685

 1,690

 1,692

 1,692

 1,694

 1,694

 1,697

 1,701

 1,701

 1,701

 1,702

 1,703

 1,704

 1,705

 1,706

 1,706

 1,706

 1,705

 1,705

 1,703

 1,703

 1,703

 1,704

STORAGE

+3

+3

+1

+2

+7

+4

+5

+4

+5

+2

+0

+2

+0

+3

+4

+0

+0

+1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+0

+0

-1

+0

-2

+0

+0

+1

CHANGE

2

2

1

1

4

2

3

2

3

1

0

1

0

2

2

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

-1

0

-1

0

0

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2022 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 1, 2022

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +48 30 0 0

ACRE-FEET +48 60 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 1,656

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
_______________________________________ __ _____________ _______________ _____________

_____________ _______________ _____________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 3, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 133429(143) Maura D. Corrigan 133554 Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., et al, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC: 133429 v COA: 265870 Ingham CC: 05-000368-CZ GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant, and

CITY OF KALAMAZOO, Defendant-Appellee, and

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Intervening D efendant-Appellee.

NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK, INC., a nonprofit organization on beha lf of its Michigan Members, et al

., Plaintiffs-Appellants, SC: 133554 v COA: 265870 Ingham CC: 05-000368-CZ GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN and CITY OF KALAMAZOO, Defendants-Appellees, and

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Intervening D efendant-Appellee.

On order of the Chi ef Justice, motion by the Michigan State Medical Society for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 3, 2007

Clerk
### §6305. Definitions

For purposes of this subchapter—

(1) the term "foreign person" means—

(A) an individual who is not a citizen of the United States or an alien admitted for permanent residence to the United States; or

(B) a corporation, partnership, or other nongovernment entity which is created or organized under the laws of a foreign country or which has its principal place of business outside the United States;

(2) the term "goods or technology" means—

(A) nuclear materials and equipment and sensitive nuclear technology (as such terms are defined in section 3203 of this title), all export items designated by the President pursuant to section 2139a(c) of title 42, and all technical assistance requiring authorization under section 2077(b) of title 42, and

(B) in the case of exports from a country other than the United States, any goods or technology that, if exported from the United States, would be goods or technology described in subparagraph (A);

(3) the term "IAEA safeguards" means the safeguards set forth in an agreement between a country and the International Atomic Energy Agency, as authorized by Article III(A)(5) of the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency;

(4) the term "nuclear explosive device" means any device, whether assembled or disassembled, that is designed to produce an instantaneous release of an amount of nuclear energy from special nuclear material that is greater than the amount of energy that would be released from the detonation of one pound of trinitrotoluene (TNT);

(5) the term "non-nuclear-weapon state" means any country which is not a nuclear-weapon state, as defined by Article IX (3) of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, signed at Washington, London, and Moscow on July 1, 1968;

(6) the term "special nuclear material" has the meaning given that term in section 2014(aa) of title 42;

(7) the term "United States person" means—

(A) an individual who is a citizen of the United States or an alien admitted for permanent residence to the United States; or

(B) a corporation, partnership, or other nongovernment entity which is not a foreign person; and

(8) the term "unsafeguarded special nuclear material" means special nuclear material which is held in violation of IAEA safeguards or not subject to IAEA safeguards (excluding any quantity of material that could, if it were exported from the United States, be exported under a general license issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission).

(Pub. L. 103–236, title VIII, §830, Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 521.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original a reference to this part, meaning part B of title VIII of Pub. L. 103–236, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of part B to the Code, see Effective Date note set out under section 6301 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective 60 days after Apr. 30, 1994, see section 831 of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 6301 of this title.