alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 618.715 Applications for Trade Readjustment Allowances and payment. ( a ) *Timing of applications.* ( 1 ) An initial application for TRA must be filed after certification of the appropriate worker group has been made.
( 2 ) An application for TRA must be filed within the time limit applicable to claims for regular compensation under the applicable State law.
( b ) *Applicable procedures.* Applications must be filed in accordance with this subpart and on forms furnished to AAWs by the State. The State's procedures for filing applications for TRA, and for reporting, must be consistent with this part and the Department's “Standard for Claim Filing, Claimant Reporting, Job Finding, and Employment Services,” Employment Security Manual, part V, sections 5000 through 5004 (appendix A to this part), except that such procedures may allow for the filing and processing of applications by paper, telephone, the internet, or other similar methods as provided for in paragraph (e)(2) of this section.
( c ) *Treatment of determinations.* Determinations on TRA applications are determinations to which §§ 618.820 (determinations of eligibility; notices to individuals), 618.824 (liable State and agent State responsibilities), and 618.828 (appeals and hearings) apply. Copies of such applications for TRA and all determinations by the State on such applications must be included in the AAW's case file.
( d ) *Payment of TRA.* ( 1 ) A State must not make any payment of TRA until a certification is issued and the State determines that the AAW is a member of a worker group covered under the specified certification.
( 2 ) An AAW, if he or she otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of this subpart, including exhaustion of UI, may be entitled to TRA for any week of unemployment that begins on or after the date of the applicable certification.
( 3 ) An AAW may receive only one form of TRA (Basic, Additional, or Completion) for any given week.
( e ) *Taking of applications.* ( 1 ) An initial application is required for TRA and a separate application is required for Completion TRA.
( 2 ) Applications may be filed and processed by any means allowed for UI claims in the State.
( 3 ) States must provide notice to the worker when a worker begins receipt of Additional TRA. That notice must include the eligibility requirements under which Additional TRA is payable.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 725.99

 726.14

 726.24

 726.36

 726.46

 726.56

 726.66

 726.76

 726.85

 726.94

 727.01

 727.09

 727.17

 727.26

 727.34

 727.42

 727.49

 727.56

 727.66

 727.70

 727.78

 727.86

 727.94

 728.02

 728.10

 728.17

 728.25

 728.33

 728.40

 728.48

 728.55

 1,412

 1,418

 1,422

 1,426

 1,430

 1,434

 1,438

 1,442

 1,446

 1,450

 1,452

 1,456

 1,459

 1,463

 1,466

 1,469

 1,472

 1,475

 1,479

 1,481

 1,484

 1,487

 1,491

 1,494

 1,497

 1,500

 1,503

 1,507

 1,509

 1,513

 1,516

STORAGE

+6

+6

+4

+4

+4

+4

+4

+4

+4

+4

+2

+4

+3

+4

+3

+3

+3

+3

+4

+2

+3

+3

+4

+3

+3

+3

+3

+4

+2

+4

+3

CHANGE

3

3

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2017 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 1, 2018

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +110 61 0 0

ACRE-FEET +110 121 0 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 0

 1,406

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
### §6040. Importation safeguard against certain Cuban products

#### (a) Prohibition on import of and dealings in Cuban products

The Congress notes that section 515.204 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, prohibits the entry of, and dealings outside the United States in, merchandise that—

(1) is of Cuban origin;

(2) is or has been located in or transported from or through Cuba; or

(3) is made or derived in whole or in part of any article which is the growth, produce, or manufacture of Cuba.

#### (b) Effect of NAFTA

The Congress notes that United States accession to the North American Free Trade Agreement does not modify or alter the United States sanctions against Cuba. The statement of administrative action accompanying that trade agreement specifically states the following:

(1) "The NAFTA rules of origin will not in any way diminish the Cuban sanctions program. . . . Nothing in the NAFTA would operate to override this prohibition.".

(2) "Article 309(3) [of the NAFTA] permits the United States to ensure that Cuban products or goods made from Cuban materials are not imported into the United States from Mexico or Canada and that United States products are not exported to Cuba through those countries.".

#### (c) Restriction of sugar imports

The Congress notes that section 902(c) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (Public Law 99–198) requires the President not to allocate any of the sugar import quota to a country that is a net importer of sugar unless appropriate officials of that country verify to the President that the country does not import for reexport to the United States any sugar produced in Cuba.

#### (d) Assurances regarding sugar products

Protection of essential security interests of the United States requires assurances that sugar products that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, into the customs territory of the United States are not products of Cuba.

(Pub. L. 104–114, title I, §110, Mar. 12, 1996, 110 Stat. 800.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 902(c) of the Food Security Act of 1985, referred to in subsec. (c), is section 902(c) of Pub. L. 99–198, which is set out as a note under section 1446g of Title 7, Agriculture.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 720.81

 720.69

 719.79

 718.81

 718.39

 728.18

 729.16

 728.87

 728.54

 729.04

 729.03

 729.44

 732.03

 738.03

 737.98

 736.47

 733.44

 729.50

 725.52

 721.55

 716.75

 712.50

 713.80

 730.20

 728.90

 725.44

 720.91

 717.08

 717.07

 715.00

 715.80

 1,215

 1,211

 1,178

 1,143

 1,129

 1,500

 1,541

 1,529

 1,515

 1,536

 1,535

 1,552

 1,662

 1,935

 1,933

 1,862

 1,724

 1,555

 1,393

 1,242

 1,073

 936

 977

 1,584

 1,530

 1,390

 1,219

 1,084

 1,083

 1,015

 1,041

STORAGE

+23

-4

-33

-35

-14

+371

+41

-12

-14

+21

-1

+17

+110

+273

-2

-71

-138

-169

-162

-151

-169

-137

+41

+607

-54

-140

-171

-135

-1

-68

+26

CHANGE

27

18

8

7

18

212

46

19

18

36

24

34

80

164

41

39

11

5

8

14

5

-2

61

384

73

29

14

8

49

16

63

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 15

 20

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 26

 42

 75

 81

 90

 90

 90

 90

 67

 40

 78

 100

 100

 100

 76

 50

 50

 50

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2003 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 2, 2004

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -151 1,529 0 1,605

ACRE-FEET -151 3,033 0 3,184

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 3,184

 3,184

 1,192

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
October 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. PUTAH 

SOUTH

PUTAH 

CREEK

C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

633

1 130.70 656 23 242 209 21 0 0.06 0.07

2 130.77 664 8 236 210 21 1 0.21 0.00

3 130.78 665 1 213 190 21 1 0.20 0.00

4 130.64 649 -16 225 211 21 1 0.27 0.00

5 130.45 628 -21 232 221 21 1 0.27 0.00

6 130.32 614 -14 225 210 21 1 0.26 0.00

7 130.42 625 11 227 199 21 1 0.27 0.00

8 130.63 648 23 226 192 21 1 0.22 0.00

9 130.73 659 11 234 206 21 1 0.25 0.00

10 130.78 665 6 230 206 21 0 0.09 0.00

11 130.76 663 -2 221 200 21 1 0.19 0.00

12 130.86 674 11 223 195 21 1 0.24 0.00

13 130.87 675 1 195 171 22 1 0.19 0.00

14 130.69 655 -20 177 163 23 1 0.15 0.00

15 130.65 650 -5 186 165 23 1 0.14 0.00

16 130.51 634 -16 215 199 23 1 0.18 0.00

17 130.74 660 26 245 208 23 1 0.14 0.00

18 130.62 646 -14 316 225 97 1 0.23 0.00

19 130.60 644 -2 388 250 138 1 0.21 0.00

20 130.51 634 -10 362 241 125 1 0.23 0.00

21 130.52 635 1 360 233 125 1 0.25 0.00

22 130.90 678 43 363 216 125 0 0.11 0.00

23 130.89 677 -1 336 224 113 0 0.02 0.41

24 130.73 659 -18 309 228 90 0 0.13 0.00

25 130.60 644 -15 192 141 58 1 0.15 0.00

26 130.19 600 -44 71 55 38 0 0.14 0.00

27 130.83 670 70 92 26 31 0 0.11 0.00

28 130.86 674 4 38 4 32 0 0.11 0.00

29 130.88 676 2 36 0 34 1 0.26 0.00

30 129.88 568 -108 -19 0 34 1 0.26 0.00

31 129.72 553 -15 35 11 32 0 0.09 0.00

TOTALS -80 6,631 5,209 1,438 22 5.63 0.48

ACRE-FEET -80 13,153 10,332 2,852 44

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Putah South Canal 10,332

Putah Creek 2,852

Total 13,184

Precipitation

This month = 0.48

October 01, 2023 To date = 0.48

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Solano Daily Operations

Run Date: 11/10/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.49

 130.58

 130.47

 130.61

 130.64

 130.55

 130.68

 130.66

 130.56

 130.56

 130.55

 130.64

 130.67

 130.64

 130.63

 130.74

 130.68

 130.71

 130.84

 130.86

 130.84

 130.70

 130.82

 130.74

 130.88

 130.62

 130.89

 130.80

 130.85

 130.86

 130.85

 632

 642

 630

 645

 649

 639

 654

 651

 640

 640

 639

 649

 652

 649

 648

 660

 654

 657

 671

 674

 671

 656

 669

 660

 676

 646

 677

 667

 673

 674

 673

STORAGE

-12

+10

-12

+15

+4

-10

+15

-3

-11

+0

-1

+10

+3

-3

-1

+12

-6

+3

+14

+3

-3

-15

+13

-9

+16

-30

+31

-10

+6

+1

-1

CHANGE

435

459

502

554

590

626

695

723

723

715

688

636

626

642

648

645

612

596

610

620

620

611

672

707

739

704

748

704

705

692

658

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 50

 53

 53

 49

 48

 44

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 397

 410

 464

 501

 544

 580

 633

 671

 679

 666

 644

 587

 580

 600

 605

 595

 571

 550

 559

 574

 578

 575

 621

 668

 687

 675

 688

 665

 658

 647

 615

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .24

 .32

 .31

 .46

 .36

 .39

 .33

 .36

 .36

 .34

 .39

 .27

 .40

 .29

 .27

 .29

 .34

 .35

 .36

 .25

 .33

 .37

 .35

 .36

 .34

 .34

 .26

 .32

 .36

 .38

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2011 RUN DATE: 09/06/2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +29 19,905 18,487 1,372 32 10.41 .00

ACRE-FEET +29 39,482 36,669 2,721 63

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,721

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 36,669

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2011 .00

 644

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Sputnik Enterprises Inc. (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Sputnik Enterprises
Inc.





Dated:
      March 24, 2010
              By:
              /s/David LaDukeDavid
      LaDuke, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Sputnik Enterprises Inc., and will be retained by Sputnik Enterprises Inc., and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 667.830 When will the Administrative Law Judge issue a decision? ( a ) The ALJ should render a written decision not later than 90 days after the closing of the record.
( b ) The decision of the ALJ constitutes final agency action unless, within 20 days of the decision, a party dissatisfied with the ALJ's decision has filed a petition for review with the Administrative Review Board (ARB) (established under Secretary's Order No. 01-2020), specifically identifying the procedure, fact, law, or policy to which exception is taken, in accordance with 29 CFR part 26. Any exception not specifically urged is deemed to have been waived. A copy of the petition for review must be sent to the opposing party at that time. Thereafter, the decision of the ALJ constitutes final agency action unless the ARB, within 30 days of the filing of the petition for review, notifies the parties that the case has been accepted for review. In any case accepted by the ARB, a decision must be issued by the ARB within 180 days of acceptance. If a decision is not so issued, the decision of the ALJ constitutes final agency action.
[65 FR 49421, Aug. 11, 2000, as amended at 85 FR 13030, Mar. 6, 2020; 85 FR 30615, May 20, 2020; 86 FR 1779, Jan. 11, 2021]
(No. 4204

#### Dominic Di Orio, et al, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 19, 1950.*

Gírese and Gíbese, Attorneys for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; 0. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

S CHUMAN, C. J.

The facts in this case show that Dominic Di Orio was the owner óf a 1946 Chrysler automobile, and that on June 14, 1948 he, together with his wife, Dorothy Di Orio, and his wife’s brother, a minor of the age of 4 years, were riding in said automobile at about 11:30 A.M. in the morning, and driving east on Grand Avenue. The claimant, Dominic Di Orio, was driving. Dorothy, his wife, was sitting in the front seat beside him, and her young brother was on her lap. The testimony showed that Dominic Di Orio came down a small hill, and saw a hole in the road when he was about 10 or 12 feet from it; that he was driving about 30 miles an hour, was unable to miss the hole, struck it, and turned his car over into a ditch.

The evidence showed that medical treatments were necessary, and, Dominic Di Orio, together with his wife, Dorothy, sustained loss of time from work as a result of injuries received in the accident.

At the place where the accident occurred, the high*54way had been designated as Illinois Federal Secondary Proj. No. S-167 (1) Section 35, located in DuPage County, Illinois. This road was originally constructed in cooperation with the Federal Government, and turned over to DuPage County to maintain. Because of the determination of the Court hereinafter set forth, it will not be necessary to discuss whether the State or the County would be liable to maintain this road. The Court feels that in order to hold the State for any liability for defects in roads that there must be competent evidence in the record to show that the State had either actual notice, or constructive notice of a defect in the road, and negligently failed to take steps to protect the traveling public.

It would establish a dangerous precedent for this Court to hold that the State would be liable for all defects on a highway, which it was under a duty to maintain. There is no evidence in this record of the nature of the hole, its size, how long it had been there, how it had been created, or of any notice to the State of its existence, either actual or constructive. There is, therefore, nothing in the record to show that the respondent was guilty of any negligence. To hold that the State would be liable without notice, actual or constructive, would be making the State an insurer.

This Court, by prior decision, is committed to the rule that the evidence must show that the State had actual or constructive notice of the defect, and negligently failed to take precaution to protect the traveling public. *(Dockery*v. *State,*18 C.C.R. 177.)

For the reasons assigned, claim is denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4515 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4515

To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the maximum penalty 
                            for mail theft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 10, 2016

 Mr. Calvert (for himself and Mr. Cook) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the maximum penalty 
                            for mail theft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring the Safety of Our Mail Act 
of 2016''.

SEC. 2. INCREASING THE MAXIMUM PENALTY FOR MAIL THEFT.

    Section 1708 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``not more than five years'' and inserting ``not more than 10 
years''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Application of Robert J. Derby for Admission to Practice as an Attorney. (From the State of Texas.)

Application granted. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
### §§281b–2 to 281j. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections 281b–2 to 281j of this title contained provisions relating to the Institute of Inter-American Affairs. The Institute was created pursuant to act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, 61 Stat. 780. Section 3 of such act, as amended, provided that the Institute was to have succession until June 30, 1960. See Codification note set out under section 281 of this title.

Section 281b–2, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §544(a), 68 Stat. 862; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §11(b)(1), 71 Stat. 365, authorized the Institute of Inter-American Affairs to make contracts for periods not to exceed five years, with the proviso that any contract extending beyond June 30, 1960, be made subject to termination by the Institute upon notice, and provided that the Institute, on and after July 1, 1954, be subject to the applicable provisions of the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921, as amended, in lieu of the provisions of the Government Corporation Control Act, as amended [31 U.S.C. 9101 et seq.].

Section 281c, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §4, 61 Stat. 782, provided for transfer of assets to United States Treasury upon termination of corporate life of Institute of Inter-American Affairs.

Section 281d, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §5, 61 Stat. 782, established a Board of Directors for Institute of Inter-American Affairs, and enumerated powers of Board.

Section 281e, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §6, 61 Stat. 782, provided that Institute of Inter-American Affairs be a nonprofit corporation, have no capital stock, and that no part of its revenue, earnings, or other income or property inure to benefit of its directors, officers, and employees.

Section 281f, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §7, 61 Stat. 782, authorized officers and employees of Institute of Inter-American Affairs to hold offices upon approval of Institute, with governments or governmental agencies of other American Republics.

Section 281g, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §8, 61 Stat. 782, authorized Secretary of State to detail employees of Department of State to Institute of Inter-American Affairs.

Section 281h, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §9, 61 Stat. 783, provided that principal office of Institute of Inter-American Affairs be located in District of Columbia, with branch offices any place in United States or other American Republics.

Section 281i, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §10, 61 Stat. 783, exempted Institute of Inter-American Affairs from taxation by any Federal, State, or local taxing authority.

Section 281j, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §11, 61 Stat. 783, reserved right to alter, amend or repeal provisions of sections 281 to 281b and 281c to 281l of this title, and set forth savings clause for such provisions.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24986]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10059]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application; 
Cambrex Charles City, Inc.

    Pursuant to Sec.  1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on November 30, 2011, Cambrex 
Charles City, Inc., 1205 11th Street, Charles City, Iowa 50616, made 
application by letter to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of 
controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cocaine (9041).............................  II
Opium tincture (9630)......................  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for sale to its customers.
    Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently 
registered with DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments 
or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 
21 CFR 1301.33(a).
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than June 25, 2012.

     Dated: April 17, 2012.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
 Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-10059 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P