alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 109

 103

 138

 140

 120

 113

 109

 124

 107

 135

 110

 114

 114

 113

 113

 112

 119

 113

 109

 113

 125

 135

 134

 127

 131

 132

 131

 127

 160

 163

 170

 100

 96

 98

 114

 112

 104

 104

 105

 105

 107

 108

 108

 109

 105

 105

 109

 108

 109

 106

 104

 103

 116

 126

 125

 127

 122

 120

 113

 102

 138

 139

 104

 100

 117

 126

 116

 110

 108

 107

 106

 110

 109

 110

 111

 109

 109

 110

 111

 111

 108

 108

 111

 123

 129

 126

 128

 125

 122

 119

 127

 144

 151

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2001 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 14, 2002

HIGH LOW MEAN

 53.9

 55.0

 54.9

 53.4

 51.9

 53.8

 55.2

 54.8

 53.3

 51.7

 50.8

 51.7

 51.7

 52.0

 50.8

 49.8

 50.7

 52.1

 51.6

 52.3

 52.1

 51.9

 52.5

 51.5

 51.9

 52.6

 53.0

 52.9

 53.6

 54.9

 56.1

 53.1

 53.2

 53.1

 51.1

 51.3

 51.9

 53.5

 53.1

 51.7

 50.3

 49.4

 50.0

 50.0

 50.8

 49.3

 48.3

 49.5

 50.2

 51.1

 51.2

 51.0

 51.3

 51.3

 50.3

 50.6

 51.7

 51.8

 52.3

 52.7

 53.4

 54.8

 53.5

 53.9

 53.9

 52.3

 51.7

 52.8

 54.3

 53.9

 52.5

 51.1

 50.3

 50.9

 50.9

 51.4

 50.0

 49.2

 50.0

 51.3

 51.4

 51.6

 51.6

 51.4

 51.8

 51.0

 51.3

 52.1

 52.3

 52.7

 53.1

 54.0

 55.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.6

 8.3

 0.0

 9.6

 9.7

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.4

 10.4

 10.5

 10.2

 10.3

 10.6

 10.4

 10.3

 10.0

 9.9

 9.8

 9.5

 9.3

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.2

 8.9

 8.9

 8.1

 8.3

 7.4

 0.0

 9.4

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.8

 10.0

 10.1

 10.1

 9.8

 9.8

 10.2

 10.1

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.4

 9.1

 9.1

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.1

 8.9

 8.7

 8.2

 7.6

 8.5

 8.0

 0.0

 9.6

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.8

 10.0

 10.1

 10.2

 10.2

 10.0

 10.1

 10.4

 10.3

 10.1

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.3

 9.2

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 9.1

 8.8

 8.6

 7.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4416 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2016 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself and Mr. DELANEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12715, the 

8 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

9 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

10 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requireVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:20 Feb 02, 2016 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4416.IH H4416

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4416 IH

1 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

2 under that section, extend the time period during which 

3 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

4 the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 

5 the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued 

6 by the Commission. Any obligation of the licensee for the 

7 payment of annual charges under section 10(e) of the Fed8 eral Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence upon 

9 conclusion of the time period to commence construction 

10 of the project, as extended by the Commission under this 

11 subsection. 

12 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

13 period required for commencement of construction of the 

14 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

15 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall 

16 reinstate the license effective as of the date of its expira17 tion and the first extension authorized under subsection 

18 (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 124

 103

 90

 120

 124

 90

 138

 109

 94

 89

 121

 98

 92

 68

 67

 64

 69

 67

 65

 69

 68

 65

 69

 69

 66

 68

 66

 66

 69

 69

 90

 86

 82

 83

 82

 80

 84

 85

 84

 82

 89

 84

 66

 63

 64

 63

 63

 65

 64

 64

 64

 64

 64

 66

 65

 65

 65

 65

 66

 66

 100

 90

 86

 94

 88

 84

 97

 90

 86

 84

 98

 86

 78

 65

 65

 64

 66

 65

 65

 66

 65

 65

 67

 67

 65

 67

 66

 65

 68

 67

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 19, 2011

HIGH LOW MEAN

 67.1

 67.4

 68.1

 68.1

 68.1

 67.9

 68.1

 67.9

 68.0

 68.7

 68.5

 68.9

 66.7

 62.2

 61.4

 60.4

 60.1

 60.2

 60.7

 60.6

 60.4

 60.2

 60.1

 60.7

 60.0

 59.2

 59.8

 59.6

 59.8

 59.8

 64.7

 64.9

 65.5

 65.9

 65.5

 65.3

 65.2

 65.0

 65.8

 66.1

 66.1

 65.5

 60.4

 59.5

 59.4

 58.6

 58.1

 58.3

 58.3

 58.7

 58.6

 58.3

 58.0

 59.2

 58.9

 58.1

 58.6

 58.5

 58.3

 58.4

 65.8

 66.0

 66.7

 67.0

 67.0

 66.7

 66.6

 66.5

 66.8

 67.4

 67.4

 67.0

 65.0

 60.7

 60.3

 59.5

 59.0

 59.3

 59.5

 59.6

 59.4

 59.1

 59.1

 59.9

 59.3

 58.7

 59.2

 59.1

 59.0

 59.0

HIGH LOW MEAN

 7.8

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 9.0

 9.3

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.5

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 7.3

 7.5

 7.6

 7.6

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.2

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 7.5

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

 7.8

 7.9

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 7.9

 7.9

 8.0

 8.3

 9.0

 9.1

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 4,404

 5,004

 6,083

 4,587

 5,807

 5,299

 4,545

 5,003

 4,789

 4,660

 5,231

 5,357

 7,581

 5,878

 5,429

 6,221

 5,278

 4,996

 4,761

 5,299

 5,027

 6,113

 5,523

 4,734

 4,674

 7,001

 4,863

 4,123

 3,829

 4,331

 78,012

 78,295

 79,134

 80,956

 81,266

 82,720

 83,618

 83,755

 84,320

 84,653

 84,848

 85,575

 86,385

 89,268

 90,388

 91,027

 92,385

 92,780

 92,887

 92,766

 93,162

 93,279

 94,423

 94,948

 94,698

 94,404

 96,334

 96,137

 95,247

 94,123

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2006 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

 82,416

 83,299

 85,217

 85,543

 87,073

 88,019

 88,163

 88,758

 89,109

 89,313

 90,079

 90,932

 93,966

 95,146

 95,817

 97,248

 97,663

 97,776

 97,648

 98,065

 98,189

 99,392

 99,946

 99,682

 99,372

 101,405

 101,197

 100,260

 99,076

 98,454

 3,870,000

 3,849,000

 3,827,000

 3,806,000

 3,785,000

 3,763,000

 3,742,000

 3,721,000

 3,700,000

 3,678,000

 3,657,000

 3,636,000

 3,614,000

 3,593,000

 3,572,000

 3,550,000

 3,529,000

 3,508,000

 3,486,000

 3,465,000

 3,444,000

 3,422,000

 3,401,000

 3,380,000

 3,359,000

 3,337,000

 3,316,000

 3,295,000

 3,273,000

 3,252,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 82,118
#### § 653.102 Job information.

All SWAs must make job order information conspicuous and available to MSFWs by all reasonable means. Such information must, at minimum, be available through internet labor exchange systems and through the one-stop centers. SWAs must ensure ES staff at one-stop centers provide assistance to MSFWs to access job order information easily and efficiently.

[81 FR 56341, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 626, Jan. 6, 2020; 88 FR 82726, Nov. 24, 2023]
Respondent Mary E. Bochiardy filed a document entitled

“ U.S. Department of Transportation Request for Supplemental Material ”

on June 20, 2014. This document was received by the

FAA Hearing Docket on June 24, 2014.

The document is located at the

FAA Hearing Docket, 600 Independence Avenue, SW, Suite 2W1000

Washington, DC 20591

.

Vicki S. Leemon , AGC

- 430
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 252

 257

 250

 255

 246

 206

 204

 202

 215

 225

 256

 277

 293

 307

 297

 284

 283

 256

 250

 239

 208

 217

 221

 254

 248

 255

 268

 282

 283

 273

 276

 122

 120

 118

 125

 122

 138

 148

 153

 167

 163

 171

 176

 191

 146

 147

 129

 124

 114

 119

 133

 140

 148

 156

 158

 153

 144

 136

 136

 136

 138

 144

 180

 179

 179

 185

 192

 177

 177

 183

 195

 201

 219

 222

 226

 224

 213

 203

 187

 171

 178

 184

 176

 183

 197

 212

 211

 201

 192

 201

 207

 210

 210

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,050.69

 1,050.57

 1,050.49

 1,050.37

 1,050.30

 1,050.25

 1,050.14

 1,050.06

 1,049.93

 1,049.75

 1,049.54

 1,049.29

 1,049.17

 1,049.18

 1,049.28

 1,049.47

 1,049.46

 1,049.37

 1,049.39

 1,049.40

 1,049.31

 1,049.22

 1,049.12

 1,048.92

 1,048.77

 1,048.70

 1,048.62

 1,048.48

 1,048.51

 1,048.40

 1,982.6

 1,981.3

 1,980.4

 1,979.1

 1,978.3

 1,977.7

 1,976.5

 1,975.7

 1,974.2

 1,972.3

 1,969.9

 1,967.2

 1,965.9

 1,966.0

 1,967.1

 1,969.2

 1,969.1

 1,968.1

 1,968.3

 1,968.4

 1,967.4

 1,966.4

 1,965.3

 1,963.2

 1,961.5

 1,960.8

 1,959.9

 1,958.3

 1,958.7

 1,957.5

STORAGE

-1.2

-1.3

-0.9

-1.3

-0.8

-0.6

-1.2

-0.9

-1.4

-2.0

-2.3

-2.7

-1.3

+0.1

+1.1

+2.1

-0.1

-1.0

+0.2

+0.1

-1.0

-1.0

-1.1

-2.2

-1.6

-0.8

-0.9

-1.5

+0.3

-1.2

CHANGE

2,473

2,296

2,351

2,205

2,725

2,811

2,451

2,549

2,385

1,916

1,661

1,525

2,141

2,931

2,793

3,012

2,276

1,797

1,783

1,891

1,542

1,416

1,530

995

1,220

1,782

1,739

950

2,326

1,725

INFLOW

 2,958

 2,833

 2,667

 2,742

 2,992

 2,981

 2,954

 2,886

 3,061

 2,826

 2,730

 2,800

 2,698

 2,738

 2,116

 1,792

 2,189

 2,167

 1,567

 1,715

 1,898

 1,771

 1,938

 1,961

 1,919

 2,023

 2,053

 1,583

 2,016

 2,190

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 125

 128

 128

 128

 121

 107

 107

 107

 43

 85

 92

 106

 106

 138

 124

 170

 142

 128

 106

 121

 142

 142

 145

 138

 127

 145

 127

 138

 145

 141

C.F.S.

 .35

 .36

 .36

 .36

 .34

 .30

 .30

 .30

 .12

 .24

 .26

 .30

 .30

 .39

 .35

 .48

 .40

 .36

 .30

 .34

 .40

 .40

 .41

 .39

 .36

 .41

 .36

 .39

 .41

 .40

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 3, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -26.4 61,197 70,764 0 0 3,702 10.44 .17

ACRE-FEET -26,400 121,384 140,360 0 0 7,343

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 140,360

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 140,360

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .17

JULY 1, 1999 31.53

 1,983.8
Deny and Opinion Filed July 30, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00890-CV IN RE BOBBY DUNCAN, Relator Original Proceeding from the 296th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 296-53157-2014



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justi ce Bridges, and Justice Stoddart Opinion by Justice Bridges Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus raising various complaints regarding the actions of the trial court in the suit affecting th e parent-child relationship. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief, a relator must show both that th e trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). We conclude relator has failed to es tablish his right to mandamus relief. We deny the petition.

150890F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      17,691,000
<SECURITIES>                                43,152,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            68,285,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,225,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,431,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000
<COMMON>                                       320,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  84,760,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,225,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,144,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            43,203,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (23,975,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (23,975,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (23,975,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4291 

To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian and Iraqi refugees, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. CALVERT (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. KNIGHT, and Mr. ROHRABACHER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide for additional security requirements for Syrian 

and Iraqi refugees, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Accountability 

5 for Emigres and Refugees Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘SAFER 

6 Act of 2015’’. 

7 SEC. 2. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR SYRIAN AND IRAQI 

8 REFUGEES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Prior to admitting to the United 

10 States as a refugee under section 207 of the Immigration 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 4291 IH

1 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157) a covered alien, the 

2 Secretary of Homeland Security, in coordination with the 

3 Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the 

4 Director of National Intelligence, shall ensure that the 

5 covered alien— 

6 (1) has taken and passed a lie detector test, as 

7 determined by the Secretary; 

8 (2) has submitted to the Secretary biometric 

9 identification information, including DNA, which the 

10 Secretary has compared against all relevant data11 bases and determined that the covered alien has no 

12 known history of engaging in terrorist activity (as 

13 such term is defined in section 212(a)(3)(B)(iv) of 

14 the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

15 1182(a)(3)(B)(iv))); and 

16 (3) does not pose a threat to the national secu17 rity of the United States based on a background 

18 check that the Secretary conducts, which includes a 

19 review of the covered alien’s interactions on and 

20 posting of material to the Internet (including social 

21 media services), and for purposes of which, the alien 

22 has submitted to the Secretary such information as 

23 the Secretary determines necessary. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 4291 IH

1 (b) COVERED ALIEN.—The term ‘‘covered alien’’ 

2 means an alien applying for admission to the United 

3 States as a refugee who— 

4 (1) is a national of Iraq or Syria; 

5 (2) has no nationality and whose last habitual 

6 residence was in Iraq or Syria; or 

7 (3) has been present in Iraq or Syria at any 

8 time on or after March 1, 2011. 

9 (c) SUNSET.—This Act shall cease to have effect on 

10 the date that is 10 years after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 669.230 Can an NFJP grantee's designation be terminated? Yes, a grantee's designation may be terminated for cause: ( a ) By the Secretary, in emergency circumstances when such action is necessary to protect the integrity of Federal funds or ensure the proper operation of the program. Any grantee so terminated will be provided with written notice and an opportunity for a hearing within 30 days after the termination (WIA sec. 184(e)); or
( b ) By the Grant Officer, if there is a substantial or persistent violation of the requirements in the Act or the WIA regulations. In such a case, the Grant Officer must provide the grantee with 60 days prior written notice, stating the reasons why termination is proposed, and the applicable appeal procedures.
<page>
	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.






By: /s/ Walter Davis

Name:   Walter Davis
Title:  President of Demeter Management Corporation,
		   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 13, 2007
#### W. W. House v. W. F. Wren et al.

Filed January 3, 1898.

No. 7738.

Review: Sufficiency of Evidence. The judgment in this case, being sustained by sufficient evidence, is affirmed.

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Tibbets, J.

*Affirmed.*

*J. L. Galdwell,*for plaintiff in error.

*William G. Glark, contra.*

Ryan, C.

This was an action of replevin by plaintiff in error as owner, for the possession of a horse, against the defendants in error holding possession by virtue of a chattel mortgage made by one R. D. Plowman to W. F. Wren. There ivas a conflict in the evidence as to the correctness of the respective theories advanced by the parties. By the plaintiffs evidence it was made to appear that, accompanied by Mr. Plowman, plaintiff had purchased the horse and given his note therefor. It was rather unfortunate for this theory that Plowman’s name was affixed to this note before that of House. It was testified by House, however, that this signature of his was merely as surety, and that the possession of the horse taken and held by Plowman was solely as his bailee. Opposed to this there was evidence which justified the conclusion that the purchase was by Plowman and that the horse, therefore, was his to mortgage and dispose of as he saw fit. The trial was to the court. The judgment was adverse to House, and as it did not lack the support of sufficient evidence it must be, and accordingly is,

Affirmed.