alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Joseph QUETEL, Plaintiff, v. Joseph QUERRARD, Defendant.

Civ. No. 257-1966.

District Court, Virgin Islands, D. St. Thomas & St. John.

Jan. 17, 1968.

*342Daniel W. Ambrose, St. Thomas, V. I., for plaintiff.

William A. Pallme, St. Thomas, V. I., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WALTER A. GORDON, District Judge.

This action to determine a boundary line was tried to the Court without a jury. By findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment dated December 8, 1967, the Court held in favor of the defendant on his counterclaim.

Defendant has since submitted a bill for costs in the amount of $1,435.50. A portion of this total must be disallowed.

I

 Included in the total bill is an item of $600.00 representing the fee paid to one N. O. Wells, a surveyor, who did certain work for defendant and testified in Court as to his findings. It is eminently clear that under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the fees charged by expert witnesses are not taxable as an item of costs to the prevailing party, at least in the absence of prior Court approval. Green v. American Tobacco Co., 5 Cir., 304 F.2d 70; Euler v. Waller, 10 Cir., 295 F.2d 765; Kirby Lumber Corp. v. State of Louisiana, 5 Cir., 293 F.2d 82. See also, Annot. 97 A.L.R.2d 138 (1964). 3 Barron & Holtzhoff, 1195.

Our local rule, 5 V.I.C. § 541, provides that fees of officers, witnesses and jurors may be allowed as costs in a civil action. However, absent prior approval of the Court, or at least evidence as to the value and reasonableness of the fee charged by the expert. The Court will not summarily tax against a losing litigant the expenditures of prevailing counsel for expert testimony. Tebbs v. Alcoa S.S. Co., D.C., 139 F.Supp. 56, 3 V.I. 186, affd., 3 Cir., 241 F.2d 276, 3 V.I. 592.

The Court feels that the better practice, when counsel anticipates large items of cost, would be to petition the Court in advance for permission to tax the items as cost, should counsel prevail. See Annot. 97 A.L.R.2d 138 (1964). While the successful litigant’s items of cost would still fall under the supervision of the Court as to their reasonableness and necessity, many of the difficulties arising from extended litigation or involving experts or counsel might in this way be avoided. See, for instance, the Court’s opinion in Skeoch v. Ottley, D.C., 278 F.Supp. 314, 6 V.I. - (1968).

II

Counsel’s remaining $835.50 of which $826.25 represents attorney’s fees will *343be allowed. The Court’s responsibility in assessing a reasonable attorney’s fee has been much facilitated by counsel’s inclusion in his cost bill copies of his day-today diary notes concerning the services rendered to his client in conjunction with this lawsuit.

Let judgment be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-26CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-26CB


         The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
(a "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.16
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned Series (the
"Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

(ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                    Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

CRAIG BAINGO
EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT



/s/ Kevin Meyers                                    Dated: March 27, 2006
----------------

KEVIN MEYERS
MANAGING DIRECTOR, CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER, LOAN ADMINISTRATION
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-60615

Summary Calendar

AGRIPINA GIRON-GONZALEZ,

Petitioner

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A097 834 203

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Agripina Giron-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of her motion to reopen and rescind her in

absentia removal order. Giron contends the BIA erred by denying her motion to

reopen because the notice of her hearing before the IJ was returned as

undeliverable and, therefore, she did not receive notice of it.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 3, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-60615 Document: 00511400617 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2011
No. 10-60615

The denial of a motion to reopen is reviewed under a “highly deferential

abuse-of-discretion standard”. Gomez-Palacios v. Holder, 560 F.3d 354, 358 (5th

Cir. 2009). That denial must be affirmed as long as it is not “capricious, without

foundation in the evidence, or otherwise so irrational that it is arbitrary rather

than the result of any perceptible rational approach”. Id. Because the BIA

affirmed, without opinion, the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s factual findings

and legal conclusions. Eduard v. Ashcroft, 379 F.3d 182, 186 (5th Cir. 2004).

Those fact-findings are upheld unless “not supported by substantial evidence in

the record”. Id.

The IJ’s findings, that Giron failed to provide authorities with a current

mailing address and was admonished concerning the consequences of failing to

appear at hearings, are supported by substantial evidence in the record. See,

e.g., Gomez-Palacios, 560 F.3d at 359-61. Her failure to provide the address

supports the BIA’s decision. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii) (“an order may be

rescinded only . . . [where] alien demonstrates . . . failure to appear was through

no fault of the alien”); Gomez-Palacios, 560 F.3d at 360-61 (holding alien’s not

receiving actual notice due to his failure to keep court apprised of his mailing

address does not mean he did not receive notice). Giron’s assertions are

insufficient to show the BIA abused its discretion in denying her motion to

reopen. See, e.g., Gomez-Palacios, 560 F.3d at 360-61.

Insofar as Giron maintains she was unable to file a change of address form

with the immigration court because her notice to appear was not yet filed with

that court, we decline to consider this claim because she failed to exhaust her

administrative remedies. Roy v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 132, 137 (5th Cir. 2004).

DENIED.

2

Case: 10-60615 Document: 00511400617 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2011
### §4502. "Institution of higher education" and "Advisory Committee" defined

As used in this chapter—

(1) the term "institution of higher education" has the same meaning given such term in section 1001 of title 20; and

(2) the term "Advisory Committee" means the Advisory Committee for Studies of Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union established by section 4503(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–164, title VIII, §803, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1048; Pub. L. 103–199, title III, §302(4), Dec. 17, 1993, 107 Stat. 2322; Pub. L. 105–244, title I, §102(a)(7)(C), Oct. 7, 1998, 112 Stat. 1619.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Par. (1). Pub. L. 105–244, which directed substitution of "section 1001" for "section 1141(a)" in section 803(1) of the Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983, was executed to this section, which is section 803 of the Research and Training for Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union Act of 1983, to reflect the probable intent of Congress, and the change in the short title of that Act. See section 801 of Pub. L. 98–164, set out as a Short Title note under section 4501 of this title.

1993—Par. (2). Pub. L. 103–199 substituted "Advisory Committee for Studies of Eastern Europe and the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union" for "Soviet-Eastern European Studies Advisory Committee".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–244 effective Oct. 1, 1998, except as otherwise provided in Pub. L. 105–244, see section 3 of Pub. L. 105–244, set out as a note under section 1001 of Title 20, Education.
#### Pauline W. Berwin, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Newman et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
STORAGE - A.F. CHANGE SHASTA NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV

IRON

CANYON PIT 6 PIT 7

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S

RIVER 

C.F.S

NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 34,353 20,575 17,945 13,217 32,956 119,046 598 301 1,781 2,082 2,800.8

2 34,701 20,574 18,105 13,557 31,123 118,060 -986 -497 2,576 2,079 2,805.0

3 34,569 20,616 18,341 14,169 30,453 118,148 88 44 2,206 2,250 2,809.4

4 34,807 31,197 24,241 15,619 34,142 140,006 21,858 11,020 2,374 13,394 2,836.0

5 34,807 31,197 24,241 15,619 34,142 140,006 0 0 1,946 1,946 2,839.8

6 35,294 20,513 17,318 14,454 32,775 120,354 -19,652 -9,908 1,289 -8,619 2,822.7

7 35,076 20,435 17,651 14,508 33,081 120,751 397 200 2,601 2,801 2,828.3

8 34,884 20,396 17,570 14,760 32,670 120,280 -471 -237 2,482 2,245 2,832.8

9 35,256 16,483 17,558 15,093 32,689 117,079 -3,201 -1,614 2,061 447 2,833.6

10 34,667 20,342 17,324 14,577 32,572 119,482 2,403 1,211 2,483 3,694 2,841.0

11 33,978 20,303 17,838 14,552 32,596 119,267 -215 -108 2,470 2,362 2,845.7

12 33,896 20,287 17,074 15,141 33,403 119,801 534 269 2,036 2,305 2,850.2

13 33,766 20,229 17,608 13,911 32,536 118,050 -1,751 -883 3,139 2,192 2,854.6

14 34,075 20,226 17,412 15,135 32,576 119,424 1,374 693 1,872 2,565 2,859.7

15 34,626 20,212 17,608 14,354 33,183 119,983 559 282 1,666 1,944 2,863.5

16 34,693 20,221 17,431 14,240 33,625 120,210 227 114 2,148 2,262 2,868.0

17 34,696 20,260 18,005 13,069 33,218 119,248 -962 -485 3,009 2,524 2,873.0

18 35,656 20,361 17,966 13,269 32,399 119,651 403 203 2,499 2,702 2,878.4

19 35,644 20,384 17,058 14,517 32,300 119,903 252 127 2,794 3,035 2,884.4

20 35,481 20,315 17,170 14,677 32,385 120,028 125 63 2,338 2,511 2,889.4

21 35,676 20,276 17,590 13,924 32,855 120,321 293 148 2,228 2,376 2,894.1

22 35,939 20,295 17,601 13,456 33,509 120,800 479 241 2,170 2,457 2,899.0

23 36,591 20,318 17,782 14,109 33,218 122,018 1,218 614 1,698 2,312 2,903.5

24 36,733 20,106 15,049 14,193 32,697 118,778 -3,240 -1,633 3,636 1,864 2,907.2

25 37,222 19,807 14,602 13,952 32,742 118,325 -453 -228 3,063 2,835 2,912.9

26 37,401 19,343 13,228 12,679 33,420 116,071 -2,254 -1,136 3,368 2,232 2,917.3

27 37,095 18,736 11,369 13,267 33,065 113,532 -2,539 -1,280 3,838 2,614 2,922.5

28 36,252 17,997 9,991 14,617 32,366 111,223 -2,309 -1,164 3,573 2,409 2,927.3

29 36,074 17,200 9,088 14,524 33,035 109,921 -1,302 -656 2,703 2,068 2,931.4

30 36,020 16,287 7,443 14,901 32,710 107,361 -2,560 -1,291 3,616 2,325 2,936.0

Totals -11,087 70,213

Acre - Feet 139,267

* October 1, 2021 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At Shasta Dam

Run Date: 4/19/2023

September 2022
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.421 Determination of benefits; computation of prorated benefits. ( a ) In the month that you reacquire eligibility after a month or more of ineligibility (see § 416.1320(b)), your benefit will be prorated according to the number of days in the month that you are eligible beginning with the date on which you meet all eligibility requirements.
( b ) In determining the amount of your benefit for a month in which benefits are to be prorated, we first compute the amount of the benefit that you would receive for the month as if proration did not apply. We then determine the date on which you meet all factors of eligibility. (The income limits must be met based on the entire month and the resource limit must be as of the first day of the month.) We then count the number of days in the month beginning with the day on which you first meet all factors of eligibility through the end of the month. We then multiply the amount of your unprorated benefit for the month by the number of days for which you are eligible for benefits and divide that figure by the number of days in the month for which your benefit is being determined. The result is the amount of the benefit that you are due for the month in which benefits are to be prorated.
[51 FR 13493, Apr. 14, 1986, as amended at 64 FR 31973, June 15, 1999]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.22

 130.30

 130.30

 130.41

 130.46

 130.31

 130.21

 130.02

 129.80

 129.59

 129.66

 129.73

 129.78

 129.83

 129.77

 129.76

 129.65

 129.54

 129.59

 129.64

 129.53

 129.48

 129.26

 129.21

 129.26

 129.23

 129.20

 129.18

 129.36

 129.65

 603

 612

 612

 624

 629

 613

 602

 583

 560

 540

 547

 554

 558

 563

 557

 556

 546

 535

 540

 545

 534

 529

 508

 504

 508

 506

 503

 501

 518

 546

STORAGE

+22

+9

+0

+12

+5

-16

-11

-19

-23

-20

+7

+7

+4

+5

-6

-1

-10

-11

+5

+5

-11

-5

-21

-4

+4

-2

-3

-2

+17

+28

CHANGE

61

54

49

55

52

44

48

44

44

49

63

63

61

63

59

64

59

58

64

66

49

49

44

55

59

59

60

61

71

74

INFLOW

 28

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 29

 28

 33

 28

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

 27

PUTAH

 22

 20

 20

 20

 20

 23

 25

 25

 27

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 32

 35

 35

 35

 33

 30

 27

 25

 28

 30

 30

 33

 35

 35

 35

 33

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .05

 .09

 .12

 .10

 .08

 .09

 .11

 .04

 .07

 .10

 .14

 .10

 .13

 .28

 .32

 .25

 .13

 .08

 .08

 .06

 .02

 .05

 .04

 .14

 .12

 .07

 .02

 .04

 .01

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .17

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .42

 .82

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .25

 .03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2010 RUN DATE: 12/07/2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -35 1,701 863 853 3 2.94 2.00

ACRE-FEET -35 3,374 1,712 1,692 6

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 1,692

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 1,712

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.00

JULY 1, 2010 3.77

 581

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,055.03

 1,054.45

 1,053.92

 1,053.32

 1,052.72

 1,052.10

 1,051.50

 1,050.72

 1,050.06

 1,049.35

 1,048.70

 1,047.94

 1,047.24

 1,046.48

 1,045.82

 1,044.97

 1,044.17

 1,043.39

 1,042.64

 1,041.91

 1,041.10

 1,040.34

 1,039.61

 1,038.91

 1,038.11

 1,037.43

 1,036.73

 1,036.07

 1,035.45

 1,034.81

 1,034.14

 4,204.1

 4,187.7

 4,172.7

 4,155.8

 4,139.0

 4,121.6

 4,104.8

 4,083.1

 4,064.8

 4,045.1

 4,027.2

 4,006.3

 3,987.2

 3,966.4

 3,948.5

 3,925.4

 3,903.8

 3,882.9

 3,862.8

 3,843.3

 3,821.7

 3,801.6

 3,782.3

 3,763.7

 3,742.6

 3,724.8

 3,706.5

 3,689.2

 3,673.1

 3,656.5

 3,639.2

STORAGE

-13.1

-16.4

-15.0

-16.9

-16.9

-17.4

-16.8

-21.7

-18.3

-19.6

-17.9

-20.9

-19.2

-20.7

-18.0

-23.0

-21.6

-21.0

-20.1

-19.5

-21.5

-20.1

-19.3

-18.5

-21.1

-17.8

-18.3

-17.2

-16.1

-16.6

-17.3

CHANGE

 6,363

 5,357

 6,053

 5,836

 5,089

 4,812

 5,166

 4,670

 4,024

 4,505

 4,987

 4,693

 5,074

 4,870

 5,225

 3,763

 4,502

 3,907

 4,325

 4,364

 3,664

 3,965

 3,942

 3,597

 1,176

 2,816

 3,602

 3,890

 3,822

 3,614

 3,633

INFLOW

 12,673

 13,275

 13,293

 14,048

 13,259

 13,252

 13,309

 15,287

 12,961

 14,157

 13,731

 14,969

 14,361

 14,940

 13,960

 15,078

 15,091

 14,194

 14,134

 13,841

 14,293

 13,919

 13,385

 12,646

 11,474

 11,483

 12,503

 12,254

 11,663

 11,694

 12,091

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 68

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 283

 357

 315

 306

 330

 321

 303

 335

 302

 244

 292

 258

 306

 385

 320

 303

 294

 285

 323

 354

 235

 195

 303

 294

 332

 331

 338

 321

 282

 289

 273

C.F.S.

 .34

 .43

 .38

 .37

 .40

 .39

 .37

 .41

 .37

 .30

 .36

 .32

 .38

 .48

 .40

 .38

 .37

 .36

 .41

 .45

 .30

 .25

 .39

 .38

 .43

 .43

 .44

 .42

 .37

 .38

 .36

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 6, 2006

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -577.8 135,306 417,218 0 68 9,409 11.82 .00

ACRE-FEET -577,800 268,379 827,552 0 135 18,663

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 827,552

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 135

 827,687

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2005 .00

 4,217.2

Table 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 432.19

 430.90

 429.36

 427.97

 426.70

 425.76

 424.30

 423.60

 422.48

 421.27

 419.91

 418.55

 417.19

 416.21

 415.05

 414.15

 412.79

 411.51

 410.46

 409.59

 408.46

 407.94

 407.21

 406.05

 405.09

 404.38

 403.50

 402.41

 401.73

 400.84

 399.99

 801,186

 789,235

 775,049

 762,321

 750,754

 742,239

 729,051

 722,760

 712,736

 701,965

 689,933

 677,979

 666,103

 657,594

 647,576

 639,842

 628,223

 617,359

 608,501

 601,198

 591,761

 587,438

 581,388

 571,823

 563,952

 558,157

 551,006

 542,195

 536,726

 529,599

 522,825

STORAGE

-11,918

-11,951

-14,186

-12,728

-11,567

-8,515

-13,188

-6,291

-10,024

-10,771

-12,032

-11,954

-11,876

-8,509

-10,018

-7,734

-11,619

-10,864

-8,858

-7,303

-9,437

-4,323

-6,050

-9,565

-7,871

-5,795

-7,151

-8,811

-5,469

-7,127

-6,774

CHANGE

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 6,013

 6,055

 6,164

 6,340

 5,886

 4,210

 6,802

 3,025

 4,978

 5,636

 6,046

 6,036

 6,100

 4,244

 4,973

 3,807

 5,854

 5,492

 4,592

 3,618

 4,808

 1,950

 2,930

 4,854

 3,888

 2,820

 3,526

 4,383

 2,622

 3,546

 3,220

POWER

 125

 111

 106

 98

 90

 108

 119

 105

 100

 102

 109

 103

 106

 109

 108

 123

 116

 114

 107

 74

 120

 115

 127

 137

 131

 119

 132

 137

 121

 119

 157

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

+130

+141

-882

+21

+144

+25

+272

-41

+24

+308

+89

+112

+219

+63

+30

+31

+113

+129

+234

+11

+170

-114

+7

+169

+50

+18

+53

+78

-14

+72

-38

OR

 225

 209

 202

 201

 206

 170

 166

 154

 138

 129

 111

 128

 141

 146

 145

 125

 146

 162

 131

 103

 156

 175

 147

 146

 151

 137

 158

 148

 174

 194

 172

C.F.S.

 .75

 .70

 .68

 .68

 .70

 .58

 .57

 .53

 .48

 .45

 .39

 .45

 .50

 .52

 .52

 .45

 .53

 .59

 .48

 .38

 .58

 .65

 .55

 .55

 .57

 .52

 .60

 .57

 .67

 .75

 .67

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR September 18, 2015

DAILY OPERATIONS

JULY 2015 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -290,279 0 144,418 3,548 0 +1,624 4,896 17.61 .00

ACRE-FEET -290,279 0 286,453 7,037 0 +3,221 9,711

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 286,453

PACHECO TUNNEL 7,037 TOTAL 293,490

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2015 TO DATE = .00

 813,104

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
### §5495. Certain uses of excess foreign currencies

#### (a) Authority to use

During fiscal year 1990, the Administrator of the Agency for International Development may use, for the purposes described in subsection (b), such sums of foreign currencies described in subsection (c) as the Administrator may determine, subject to subsection (f).

#### (b) Purposes for which currency may be used

Foreign currencies may be used under this section—

(1) for the same purposes for which assistance may be provided under part I of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151 and following; relating to economic assistance), and

(2) for the support of any institution providing education for a significant number of United States nationals (who may include members of the United States Armed Forces or the Foreign Service or dependents of such members).

#### (c) Currencies which may be used

The foreign currencies which may be used under this section are United States-owned excess foreign currencies that are in excess of amounts necessary for satisfaction of preexisting commitments to use such currencies for other purposes specified by law.

#### (d) Where currencies may be used

Foreign currencies may be used under this section in the country where such currencies are held or in other foreign countries.

#### (e) Nonapplicability of other provisions of law

Foreign currencies may be used under this section notwithstanding section 1306 of title 31 or any other provision of law.

#### (f) Requirement for appropriations action

The authority of this section may be exercised only to such extent or in such amount as may be provided in advance in an appropriation Act.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title VIII, §805, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1323.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Part I of the Act is classified generally to subchapter I (§2151 et seq.) of chapter 32 of this title. For provisions deeming references to subchapter I to include parts IV (§2346 et seq.), VI (§2348 et seq.), and VIII (§2349aa et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 32, see section 202(b) of Pub. L. 92–226, set out as a note under section 2346 of this title, and sections 2348c and 2349aa–5 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.