Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Notices 25199 

emergency is not possible. See 30 CFR 

75.1506(c)(2), 75–1507, and 75–1508(a) 

and (b). This ICR covers the refuge 

alternatives portion of emergency 

response plans and records for training, 

examination, maintenance, and repair of 

refuge alternatives and components. 

This ICR has been classified as a 

revision under the PRA merely to 

acknowledge administrative decisions 

to transfer burden for some information 

collection requirements to other OMB 

Control Numbers. The agency has made 

no changes to the actual requirements. 

This information collection is subject 

to the PRA. A Federal agency generally 

cannot conduct or sponsor a collection 

of information, and the public is 

generally not required to respond to an 

information collection, unless it is 

approved by the OMB under the PRA 

and displays a currently valid OMB 

Control Number. In addition, 

notwithstanding any other provisions of 

law, no person shall generally be subject 

to penalty for failing to comply with a 

collection of information if the 

collection of information does not 

display a valid OMB Control Number. 

See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. The 

DOL obtains OMB approval for this 

information collection under Control 

Number 1219–0146. The current OMB 

approval is scheduled to expire on April 

30, 2012; however, it should be noted 

that existing information collection 

requirements submitted to the OMB 

receive a month-to-month extension 

while they undergo review. For 

additional information, see the related 

notice published in the Federal Register 

on January 31, 2012 (77 FR 4834). 

Interested parties are encouraged to 

send comments to the OMB, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs at 

the address shown in the ADDRESSES

section within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register. In 

order to help ensure appropriate 

consideration, comments should 

reference OMB Control Number 1219– 

0146. The OMB is particularly 

interested in comments that: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: DOL–MSHA. 

Title of Collection: Refuge 

Alternatives for Underground Coal 

Mines. 

OMB Control Number: 1219–0146. 

Affected Public: Private Sector— 

Businesses or Other For-Profits. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Respondents: 55. 

Total Estimated Number of 

Responses: 127. 

Total Estimated Annual Burden 

Hours: 951. 

Total Estimated Annual Other Costs 

Burden: $218. 

Dated: April 23, 2012. 

Michel Smyth, 

Departmental Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10164 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–43–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of April 9, 2012 

through April 13, 2012. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

25200 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Notices 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 

1-year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,206 ............... Stern-Leach, Cookson Precious Metals, Cookson America, 

Adecco Staffing, Qualified, etc.

Attleboro, MA .............................. February 10, 2011. 

81,206A ............ Hallmark Sweet, Cookson Precious Metals, Cookson America, 

Adecco Staffing, Qualified, etc.

Attleboro, MA .............................. February 10, 2011. 

81,206B ............ Stern Metals, Cookson Precious Metals, Cookson America, 

Adecco Staffing, Qualified, etc.

Attleboro, MA .............................. February 10, 2011. 

81,283 ............... SolarWorld Industries America LP, ProHire and Kelly Services .... Camarillo, CA ............................. February 13, 2010. 

81,293 ............... NCO Financial Systems, Inc., Innosource ...................................... Canonsburg, PA ......................... February 2, 2011. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,274 ............... Aosom LLC, Ningbo MH Industry Co., NW Staffing, Begin Right, 

Office Team, etc.

Lake Oswego, OR ...................... January 26, 2011. 

81,358 ............... Clipper Windpower, LLC, Accounts Payable Department, On-Site 

Workers of Appleone and Accountemps.

Carpinteria, CA ........................... February 21, 2011. 

81,367 ............... Infinite Convergence Solutions, Inc., Messaging Software Division, Infinite Computer Solutions, Inc.Arlington Heights, IL ................... February 27, 2011. 

81,408 ............... Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Including On Site Leased Workers of Olsten, Adecco and HR Group.Greensboro, NC ......................... March 12, 2011. 

81,415 ............... Covidien, Medical Devices Sector, Vascular Therapies Division, 

Kelly Services.

Mansfield, MA ............................. March 13, 2011. 

81,417 ............... Nilfisk-Advance Incorporated, On Site: E-Technical, Apple One, 

Ware Technology Services and Staffing.

Plymouth, MN ............................. October 1, 2011. 

81,419 ............... Panduit Corporation, Tinley Park Manufacturing Division, On-Site 

Workers from Aerotek, Inc.

Tinley Park, IL ............................ November 25, 2011. 

81,419A ............ Panduit Corporation, New Lenox Production Division, Cable Tie 

Division, Areotek, Inc.

New Lenox, IL ............................ November 25, 2011. 

81,425 ............... Becromal of America, Inc., Resource MFG .................................... Clinton, TN ................................. March 15, 2011. 

81,430 ............... Vectron International ....................................................................... Hudson, NH ................................ March 19, 2011. 

81,435 ............... Albany International, Corrugated Belts Division ............................. Albany, NY ................................. May 22, 2012. 

81,440 ............... KRACO Enterprises, LLC, A Subsidiary of Sun Capital Partners, 

Inc.

Compton, CA .............................. March 21, 2011. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 82 / Friday, April 27, 2012 / Notices 25201 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,446 ............... WellPoint, Inc., NE Enrollment and Billing Division, Aerotek, Kelly 

and Populus Group.

North Haven, CT ........................ March 22, 2011. 

81,456 ............... Siltronic Corporation, FAB1 Plant, Express Temporaries and 

Aerotek Commercial, etc.

Portland, OR ............................... March 28, 2011. 

81,465 ............... Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, Wellpoint, Inc., Service Operations, Blue Cross and Blue Shield in Georgia.Richmond, VA ............................ April 29, 2011. 

81,470 ............... Capewell Horsenails, Inc., Mustad USA, Premiere Staffing, Kelly 

Staffing, Lauren Staffing, etc.

Bloomfield, CT ............................ March 27, 2011. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,427 ............... Bremner Food Group Inc ................................................................ Fort Smith, AR.

81,433 ............... Afni, Inc., Experis ............................................................................ San Antonio, TX.

Determinations Terminating 

Investigations of Petitions for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

After notice of the petitions was 

published in the Federal Register and 

on the Department’s Web site, as 

required by Section 221 of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 2271), the Department initiated 

investigations of these petitions. 

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitioner has requested 

that the petition be withdrawn. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,391 ............... Shape Corporation .......................................................................... Grand Haven, MI.

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

in cases where these petitions were not 

filed in accordance with the 

requirements of 29 CFR 90.11. Every 

petition filed by workers must be signed 

by at least three individuals of the 

petitioning worker group. Petitioners 

separated more than one year prior to 

the date of the petition cannot be 

covered under a certification of a 

petition under Section 223(b), and 

therefore, may not be part of a 

petitioning worker group. For one or 

more of these reasons, these petitions 

were deemed invalid. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,371 ............... Flo-Pro, Inc., A Division of Introcan, Motor Parts of America, Inc .. Bedford, NH.

The following determinations 

terminating investigations were issued 

because the petitions are the subject of 

ongoing investigations under petitions 

filed earlier covering the same 

petitioners. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

81,485 ............... Convergys Corporation, Microsoft Answer Desk Project ................ Ogden, UT.

I hereby certify that the aforementioned 

determinations were issued during the period 

of April 9, 2012 through April 13, 2012. 

These determinations are available on the 

Department’s Web site tradeact/taa/taa 

search form.cfm. under the searchable listing 

of determinations or by calling the Office of 

Trade Adjustment Assistance toll free at 888– 

365–6822. 

Dated: April 18, 2012. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10165 Filed 4–26–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Eligibility To 

Apply for Worker Adjustment 

Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES