alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.919m Diagnostic tests or procedures.

We will request the results of any diagnostic tests or procedures that have been performed as part of a workup by your treating source or other medical source and will use the results to help us evaluate impairment severity or prognosis. However, we will not order diagnostic tests or procedures that involve significant risk to you, such as myelograms, arteriograms, or cardiac catheterizations for the evaluation of disability under the Supplemental Security Income program. A State agency medical consultant must approve the ordering of any diagnostic test or procedure when there is a chance it may involve significant risk. The responsibility for deciding whether to perform the examination rests with the medical source designated to perform the consultative examination.

[56 FR 36966, Aug. 1, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 11879, Mar. 7, 2000; 71 FR 16459, Mar. 31, 2006; 76 FR 24810, May 3, 2011]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 523.68

 523.40

 522.71

 522.60

 522.30

 521.80

 521.50

 520.84

 520.27

 519.60

 518.87

 517.95

 517.20

 516.46

 516.20

 515.44

 515.10

 515.10

 514.80

 514.50

 513.90

 513.00

 512.20

 511.20

 510.27

 509.63

 508.58

 507.31

 506.20

 505.10

 1,787,569

 1,784,164

 1,775,785

 1,774,450

 1,770,812

 1,764,754

 1,761,122

 1,753,143

 1,746,261

 1,738,184

 1,729,399

 1,718,348

 1,709,358

 1,700,503

 1,697,396

 1,688,325

 1,684,272

 1,684,272

 1,680,698

 1,677,128

 1,669,994

 1,659,313

 1,649,839

 1,638,022

 1,627,059

 1,619,529

 1,607,201

 1,592,334

 1,579,378

 1,566,575

STORAGE

-4,867

-3,405

-8,379

-1,335

-3,638

-6,058

-3,632

-7,979

-6,882

-8,077

-8,785

-11,051

-8,990

-8,855

-3,107

-9,071

-4,053

+0

-3,574

-3,570

-7,134

-10,681

-9,474

-11,817

-10,963

-7,530

-12,328

-14,867

-12,956

-12,803

CHANGE

971

935

940

945

1,378

1,240

1,290

0

1,303

477

1,296

0

965

949

0

0

985

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

501

503

0

0

0

0

PUMPING

 3,060

 2,720

 4,151

 1,516

 2,264

 4,356

 2,199

 3,865

 4,285

 4,208

 5,330

 5,307

 5,125

 5,107

 1,732

 3,925

 2,538

 0

 1,326

 1,161

 3,207

 5,225

 5,205

 5,187

 5,828

 4,061

 6,093

 7,336

 6,443

 6,427

POWER

 299

 333

 325

 328

 322

 321

 322

 300

 323

 322

 315

 298

 314

 279

 254

 258

 241

 293

 293

 264

 266

 243

 263

 280

 295

 304

 315

 325

 310

 288

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-65

+401

-688

+226

-627

+383

-600

+142

-165

-19

-80

+34

-58

-28

+419

-390

-249

+293

-182

-375

-124

+83

+691

-490

+95

+65

+193

+165

+221

+260

OR

 158

 181

 126

 134

 94

 110

 169

 121

 156

 152

 171

 116

 174

 193

 23

 139

 146

 158

 112

 73

 58

 61

 100

 107

 171

 171

 118

 144

 204

 199

C.F.S.

 .40

 .46

 .32

 .34

 .24

 .28

 .43

 .31

 .40

 .39

 .44

 .30

 .45

 .50

 .06

 .36

 .38

 .41

 .29

 .19

 .15

 .16

 .26

 .28

 .45

 .45

 .31

 .38

 .54

 .53

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR June 18, 2007

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2007 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -225,861 14,678 119,187 8,893 0 -469 4,039 10.46 .32

ACRE-FEET -225,861 29,114 236,407 17,639 0 -930 8,011

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 236,407

PACHECO TUNNEL 17,639 TOTAL 254,046

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2006 TO DATE = 4.79

 1,792,436

SPILL 0 .32

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
#### § 618.600 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the conditions and procedures under which a trade-affected worker may apply for and receive training to help secure reemployment. Training provided under this subpart must, at a reasonable cost and as quickly as possible, assist a trade-affected worker in obtaining the necessary skills to have a reasonable expectation of reemployment. All else being equal, States should prefer training that replaces 100 percent or more of a trade-affected worker's wages in adversely affected employment or that qualifies as suitable employment.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: 

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m., Friday, May 18, 2012.

# PLACE: 

1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        Surveillance, Enforcement Matters and a Rule Enforcement Review. In the event that the times or dates of these or any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.cftc.gov.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2012-10326 Filed 4-25-12; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration

                    By Notice dated October 8, 2010, and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on October 20, 2010, 75 FR 64743, ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals, 238 South Main Street, Assonet, Massachusetts 02702, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Phenylacetone (8501), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                

The company plans to import the controlled substance to manufacture amphetamine.

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a), and determined that the registration of ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest, and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated ISP Freetown Fine Chemicals to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

      ( print page 24986)    
Dated: April 17, 2012.

Joseph T. Rannazzisi,

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

[FR Doc. 2012-10052 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
### §6812. African crisis response initiative and HIV/AIDS training

#### (a) Findings

Congress finds that—

(1) the spread of HIV/AIDS constitutes a threat to security in Africa;

(2) civil unrest and war may contribute to the spread of the disease to different parts of the continent;

(3) the percentage of soldiers in African militaries who are infected with HIV/AIDS is unknown, but estimates range in some countries as high as 40 percent; and

(4) it is in the interests of the United States to assist the countries of Africa in combating the spread of HIV/AIDS.

#### (b) Education on the prevention of the spread of AIDS

In undertaking education and training programs for military establishments in African countries, the United States shall ensure that classroom training under the African Crisis Response Initiative includes military-based education on the prevention of the spread of AIDS.

(Pub. L. 106–264, title I, §114, Aug. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 754.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6843

ROBERT A. REED,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THE STATE OF MARYLAND; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR.,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA01-600-PJM)

Submitted: August 9, 2001 Decided: August 17, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert A. Reed, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert A. Reed seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000) as untimely. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Reed v. Maryland, No.

CA-01-600-PJM (D. Md. Apr. 11, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-061;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard F. Gavino, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Warrantech Corporation;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  Quarterly  Report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this Quarterly
Report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this Quarterly  Report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Quarterly Report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

         (a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this Quarterly Report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         (c)  presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         (b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and


Date:  November 7, 2003                 /s/ Richard F. Gavino
                                        ---------------------
                                        Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer



                                       45
#### Tammy Po Wah LAU, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-73293.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

Robert G. Ryan, Esq., Law Offices of Eugene C. Wong, PC, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Linda S. Wendtland, Esq., Elizabeth J. Stevens, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Tammy Po Wah Lau is a native and citizen of China. Lau petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her application for asylum as time-barred, and denying her claims for withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Lau only contests the denial of withholding of removal and CAT relief. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.

‘Where, as here, the BIA adopts the IJ’s decision while adding its own reasons, we review both decisions.” *See Kataria v. INS,*232 F.3d 1107, 1112 (9th Cir.2000).

Substantial evidence supports the IJ and BIA’s denial of withholding of removal because Lau failed to establish that it is more likely than not that she will be persecuted if returned to China. *See Ramadan v. Gonzales,*427 F.3d 1218, 1222-23 (9th Cir .2005).

Substantial evidence also supports the IJ’s denial of CAT relief. *See Malhi v. INS,*336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir.2003).

The voluntary departure period was stayed, and that stay will expire upon issuance of the mandate. *See Desta v. Ashcroft,*365 F.3d 741, 750 (9th Cir.2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7266

RAYMOND BRADLEY MCCARTER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF WATEREE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee, and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Rock Hill

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 0:15

- cv - 02697

- BHH )

Submitted : March 30 , 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN , Circu it Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Raymond Bradley McCarter, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Raymond Bradley McCarter seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a c onstitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional cl aims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedur al ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McCarter has not made the requisite showing. Accordin gly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument w ould not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
### §6473a. Designated persons list for particularly severe violations of religious freedom

#### (a) List

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of State, in coordination with the Ambassador at Large and in consultation with relevant government and nongovernment experts, shall establish and maintain a list of foreign individuals to whom a consular post has denied a visa on the grounds of particularly severe violations of religious freedom under section 1182(a)(2)(G) of title 8, or who are subject to financial sanctions or other measures for particularly severe violations of freedom religion.

#### (2) Reference

The list required under paragraph (1) shall be known as the "Designated Persons List for Particularly Severe Violations of Religious Freedom".

#### (b) Report

#### (1) In general

The Secretary of State shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees that contains the list required under subsection (a), including, with respect to each foreign individual on the list—

(A) the name of the individual and a description of the particularly severe violation of religious freedom committed by the individual;

(B) the name of the country or other location in which such violation took place; and

(C) a description of the actions taken pursuant to this chapter or any other Act or Executive order in response to such violation.

#### (2) Submission and updates

The Secretary of State shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees—

(A) the initial report required under paragraph (1) not later than 180 days after December 16, 2016; and

(B) updates to the report every 180 days thereafter and as new information becomes available.

#### (3) Form

The report required under paragraph (1) should be submitted in unclassified form but may contain a classified annex.

#### (4) Definition

In this subsection, the term "appropriate congressional committees" means—

(A) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate;

(B) the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate;

(C) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate;

(D) the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives;

(E) the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives; and

(F) the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives.

(Pub. L. 105–292, title VI, §605, as added Pub. L. 114–281, title V, §501(2), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1437.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (b)(1)(C), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 105–292, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2787, known as the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 6401 of this title and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 605 of Pub. L. 105–292 was renumbered section 606 and is classified to section 6474 of this title.