alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25226]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7858]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``1812: A Nation Emerges''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``1812: A Nation Emerges,'' imported from 
abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The National 
Portrait Gallery, Washington, DC from on or about June 15, 2012, until 
on or about January 27, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 19, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-10249 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 134

 133

 140

 142

 140

 140

 141

 142

 142

 143

 143

 142

 144

 141

 141

 142

 145

 150

 157

 156

 151

 157

 145

 144

 144

 142

 144

 151

 159

 180

 183

 127

 128

 128

 131

 130

 132

 136

 134

 136

 138

 136

 137

 135

 133

 129

 133

 133

 131

 128

 127

 127

 127

 124

 124

 128

 129

 125

 123

 131

 133

 133

 130

 131

 133

 136

 135

 137

 139

 139

 140

 140

 140

 140

 140

 137

 135

 137

 138

 137

 138

 136

 135

 137

 133

 133

 135

 135

 135

 136

 140

 144

 146

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 2, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 77 67 71 69.8 64.7 67.4 9.4 8.6 9.0

2 80 69 71 71.5 66.4 68.8 9.1 8.1 8.6

3 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

4 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

5 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

6 80 71 72 77.5 71.9 74.5 8.6 7.5 8.0

7 72 71 71 77.3 71.2 74.1 8.7 7.6 8.0

8 97 71 78 78.1 71.7 74.7 8.7 7.6 8.1

9 76 70 71 78.2 71.9 75.0 8.7 7.6 8.1

10 80 70 72 78.7 72.2 75.4 8.7 7.6 8.0

11 83 70 71 79.9 73.6 76.6 8.6 7.5 7.9

12 72 70 71 80.2 74.0 77.0 8.4 7.3 7.8

13 82 71 74 79.4 73.4 76.3 8.6 7.4 7.9

14 97 71 77 79.8 73.1 76.3 8.6 7.5 7.9

15 76 71 72 78.9 72.6 75.7 8.7 7.5 8.0

16 85 71 73 80.0 73.3 76.7 8.6 7.6 8.0

17 87 71 73 80.2 74.5 77.2 8.6 7.4 7.9

18 91 72 80 81.7 75.0 78.1 8.5 7.4 7.8

19 89 72 79 81.3 75.1 78.0 8.5 7.3 7.8

20 92 74 80 79.9 74.2 76.9 8.7 7.4 7.9

21 74 72 73 79.5 72.7 76.0 8.8 7.6 8.1

22 85 71 73 79.2 72.6 75.7 8.8 7.6 8.1

23 85 71 72 78.2 71.7 74.9 8.8 7.7 8.1

24 72 70 71 78.8 72.1 75.3 8.8 7.7 8.1

25 81 69 71 78.3 72.3 75.3 8.8 7.6 8.1

26 71 70 71 78.6 72.6 75.5 8.8 7.6 8.1

27 81 70 72 78.2 72.2 75.1 8.8 7.7 8.2

28 83 69 71 78.3 71.9 75.0 8.9 7.7 8.2

29 78 70 72 79.1 72.4 75.7 8.8 7.6 8.1

30 87 71 74 80.6 73.7 77.0 8.6 7.4 7.9

31 76 71 73 79.5 75.2 77.0 8.6 7.3 7.8

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: July 2022 Run Date: 11/22/2022
<PAGE>                      Exhibit 31.(b)
    I, Gregory D. Friedman, CPA, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Corporate Secretary of LNB Bancorp, Inc., certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LNB Bancorp,
Inc.;

    2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;

    3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

    4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

    b)  (THIS PARAGRAPH INTENTINNALY LEFT BLANK)

    c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

    5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

<PAGE>
    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date November 14, 2003
    ____________________________

By  /s/Gregory D. Friedman
    ____________________________
    Gregory D. Friedman, CPA
    Executive Vice President,
    Chief Financial Officer and
    Corporate Secretary
#### William E. FEIL, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. C. SULLIVAN; et al., Defendants— Appellees.

No. 05-35851.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

William E. Feil, Aberdeen, WA, pro se.

Ruth Ellen Ammons, Esq., Olympia, WA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM ***

William E. Feil, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging defendants violated his First Amendment rights by enforcing prison mail regulations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Jones v. Blanas,*393 F.3d 918, 926 (9th Cir.2004), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on the claim that defendants interfered with his access to courts. Feil cannot show he suffered an actual injury, because the record shows that he was able to present the merits of his habeas claim to the state court. *See Lewis v. Casey,*518 U.S. 343, 351-54, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996).

Moreover, summary judgment was appropriate on Feil’s claim that defendants refused to allow Feil to receive mail bearing no return address, because the evidence shows that defendants acted pursuant to a regulation passed in the legitimate *776penological interest of maintaining security. *See Morrison v. Hall,*261 F.3d 896, 907 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
#### John Garrison *alias*John Dimmick *v.*The People of the State of Illinois.

1. *Indictment—not found within period of limitation, bad.*A count in an indictment, found in September, 1876, charging a larceny to have been committed in January, 1866, without showing that the accused had, at any time, been a “person fleeing from justice,” is clearly bad, .as showing on its face that the offense was barred.

2. *Limitation—as to criminal prosecutions—effect of repeal.*Under the Rev. Stat. of 1874, the revision and repeal thereby of any statute of limitation does not stop the running of such statute as against offenses committed before such revision or repeal, but as to such offenses such statute is continued in force.

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of DuPage county; the Hon. H. H. Cody, Judge, presiding.

Mr. H. F. Vallette, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. Justice Dickey

delivered the opinion of the Court:

Plaintiff in error was convicted of larceny upon the second count of an indictment; the other counts were quashed by the court before trial. A motion to quash the second count was made before plea, and overruled, and this is assigned as error. That count charges the larceny to have been committed on January 21, 1866. The indictment was found at September term, 1876. The statute of limitations in force in 1866, provided that *97no person should be prosecuted or tried for larceny, “ unless the indictment for the same shall be found by a grand jury within three years next after the offense shall have been done or committed, provided that nothing herein contained shall extend to any person fleeing from justice.” This indictment, upon its face, shows it was not found until more than three years after the alleged commission of the offense, and this count does not contain a charge that the accused had, at any time, been a “person fleeing from justice.” Under that statute the count is clearly bad, and ought to have been quashed, unless that statute be rendered inoperative by subsequent legislation. In the Revised Statutes of 1874 there is a repealing statute covering the former criminal code and laws of limitation, and at the end thereof it is provided, “ When any limitation law has been revised by this or the 27th General Assembly, and the former limitation law repealed, such repeal shall not be construed so as to stop the running of any statute, but the time shall be construed as if such repeal had not been made.” The statute of limitation applicable to this case was revised, and the former limitation was repealed, and this statute had begun to run before the revision and repeal. Hence it did not cease to run. By this saving section, all the limitations, with all their provisos and exceptions, which were in force and had begun to run before the revision, are continued in force as to all offenses alleged to have been committed before the revision and repeal of the same. On the face of the count the prosecution was shown to have been barred, and the count ought to have been quashed. The judgment of conviction must be reversed and defendant discharged.

*Judgment reversed.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 129.48

 130.13

 130.35

 130.18

 129.90

 129.66

 129.44

 129.17

 129.16

 129.27

 129.33

 129.36

 129.32

 129.22

 129.13

 129.05

 129.35

 130.34

 130.79

 130.79

 130.66

 130.50

 130.36

 130.25

 130.11

 130.04

 129.88

 129.78

 129.66

 129.56

 129.44

 529

 594

 618

 599

 570

 547

 526

 500

 499

 509

 515

 518

 514

 505

 497

 490

 517

 616

 666

 666

 651

 633

 619

 607

 592

 585

 568

 558

 547

 537

 526

STORAGE

-45

+65

+24

-19

-29

-23

-21

-26

-1

+10

+6

+3

-4

-9

-8

-7

+27

+99

+50

+0

-15

-18

-14

-12

-15

-7

-17

-10

-11

-10

-11

CHANGE

443

117

64

51

50

53

54

59

74

80

78

77

80

80

81

81

99

135

103

75

74

76

78

79

77

81

76

80

79

80

79

INFLOW

 440

 64

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

 25

PUTAH

 26

 20

 27

 36

 40

 40

 40

 47

 50

 50

 50

 50

 57

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 53

 50

 57

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .00

 .05

 .03

 .02

 .04

 .04

 .04

 .01

 .00

 .01

 .06

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .05

 .01

 .02

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .05

 .05

 .03

 .04

 .02

 .06

 .03

 .00

 .01

 .05

 .08

INCHES

 1.10

 .79

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .20

 .08

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .07

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .28

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .15

 .00

 .07

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 RUN DATE: 02/12/2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -48 2,793 1,593 1,229 0 .91 2.97

ACRE-FEET -48 5,540 3,160 2,438 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,438

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 3,160

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.97

JULY 1, 2003 14.66

 574

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
#### § 639.8 How is the notice served?

Any reasonable method of delivery to the parties listed under § 639.6 of this part which is designed to ensure receipt of notice of least 60 days before separation is acceptable (e.g., first class mail, personal delivery with optional signed receipt). In the case of notification directly to affected employees, insertion of notice into pay envelopes is another viable option. A ticketed notice, *i.e.*, preprinted notice regularly included in each employee's pay check or pay envelope, does not meet the requirements of WARN.
§ 686.960 What procedures are available to resolve complaints and disputes? ( a ) Each Job Corps center operator and service provider must establish and maintain a grievance procedure for filing complaints and resolving disputes from applicants, students and/or other interested parties about its programs and activities. A hearing on each complaint or dispute must be conducted within 30 days of the filing of the complaint or dispute. A decision on the complaint must be made by the center operator or service provider, as appropriate, within 60 days after the filing of the complaint, and a copy of the decision must be immediately served, by first-class mail, on the complainant and any other party to the complaint. Except for complaints under § 686.470 or complaints alleging fraud or other criminal activity, complaints may be filed within 1 year of the occurrence that led to the complaint.
( b ) The procedure established under paragraph (a) of this section must include procedures to process complaints alleging violations of sec. 188 of WIOA, consistent with Department nondiscrimination regulations implementing sec. 188 of WIOA at 29 CFR part 38 and § 686.985.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.24

 130.06

 130.04

 130.04

 129.89

 129.87

 129.95

 130.35

 130.57

 130.07

 129.87

 130.12

 130.13

 130.58

 130.76

 130.58

 130.33

 130.14

 130.56

 130.56

 130.16

 129.80

 129.79

 130.21

 130.28

 129.83

 129.66

 129.95

 130.37

 130.63

 130.66

 605

 587

 585

 585

 569

 567

 576

 618

 641

 588

 567

 593

 594

 642

 663

 642

 615

 595

 640

 640

 597

 560

 559

 602

 610

 563

 547

 576

 620

 648

 651

STORAGE

-18

-18

-2

+0

-16

-2

+9

+42

+23

-53

-21

+26

+1

+48

+21

-21

-27

-20

+45

+0

-43

-37

-1

+43

+8

-47

-16

+29

+44

+28

+3

CHANGE

45

49

54

56

51

58

64

77

68

46

54

92

87

108

91

65

66

76

110

87

65

68

90

113

91

65

88

108

107

104

85

INFLOW

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 47

 57

 38

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 34

 33

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

 32

PUTAH

 20

 24

 21

 22

 25

 25

 25

 22

 9

 16

 27

 45

 52

 50

 46

 42

 46

 53

 55

 55

 55

 55

 59

 59

 55

 57

 64

 61

 53

 58

 51

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .02

 .09

 .02

 .01

 .10

 .06

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .04

 .01

 .09

 .05

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .06

 .04

 .04

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .46

 .02

 .08

 .00

 .53

 2.73

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .15

 .02

 .00

 .20

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

JANUARY 2018 RUN DATE: 02/01/2018

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +28 2,388 1,307 1,067 0 1.03 4.33

ACRE-FEET +28 4,737 2,592 2,116 0

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,116

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,592

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 4.33

JULY 1, 2017 6.44

 623

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2017 TO DATE = 6.44
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7858]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “1812: A Nation Emerges,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The National Portrait Gallery, Washington, DC from on or about June 15, 2012, until on or about January 27, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: April 19, 2012.

J. Adam Ereli,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2012-10249 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P