alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       51
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    51
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      51
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               66
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                        (30)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        51
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        8
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  8
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         8
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.000


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.154 Additional positive recruitment. ( a ) *Where to conduct additional positive recruitment.* In addition to the CO's posting of the job opportunity on an electronic job registry in accordance with § 655.144, the employer must conduct positive recruitment as required by the OFLC Administrator's determination of traditional or expected labor supply States, which is published annually in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
( b ) *Additional requirements should be comparable to non-H-2A employers in the area.* The location(s) and method(s) of the positive recruitment required of the employer must be no less than the normal recruitment efforts of non-H-2A agricultural employers of comparable or smaller size in the area of intended employment, taking into consideration the kind and degree of recruitment efforts which the employer may make to obtain foreign workers.
( c ) *Nature of the additional positive recruitment.* The OFLC Administrator's labor supply State determination will identify areas of labor supply within a State, and the NOA issued under § 655.143 will describe the precise nature of the additional positive recruitment required of the employer, if any. The employer will not be required to conduct positive recruitment in more than three States for each area of intended employment listed on the employer's *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and job order.
( d ) *Determination of labor supply States.* ( 1 ) The OFLC Administrator will make an annual determination with respect to each State whether there are other traditional or expected labor supply States and, within a traditional or expected labor supply State, areas in which there are a significant number of qualified U.S. workers who, if recruited, would be willing to make themselves available for work in that State. The OFLC Administrator will publish the determination annually on OFLC's website.
( 2 ) The determination will become effective on the date of publication on OFLC's website for employers who have not commenced positive recruitment under this subpart and will remain valid until the OFLC Administrator publishes a new determination.
( 3 ) The determination as to whether any State is a source of traditional or expected labor supply to another State will be based primarily upon information provided by the SWAs to the OFLC Administrator within 120 calendar days preceding the determination.
Exhibit 32.1

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report), I, James S. Quarforth, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/S/    JAMES S. QUARFORTHJames S. QuarforthChief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors


March 13, 2007
### §5072a. Repealed. Pub. L. 103–359, title III, §304, Oct. 14, 1994, 108 Stat. 3426

Section, Pub. L. 99–569, title I, §107, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3191, restricted intelligence agencies from cooperating with Government of South Africa.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00510-CV

H & H Sand and Gravel, Inc., a Texas Corporation

v.

Suntide Sandpit, Inc., a Texas Corporation, Mike Hurst, Individually, Phil Hurst,

Individually, and Erma Stillwell, Deceased

On appeal from the

148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 02-3448-E

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 30, 2019
### §8161. Repealed. Pub. L. 107–110, title X, §1011(5)(A), Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1986

Section, Pub. L. 89–10, title X, §10701, as added Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3841, set forth findings.
#### § 654.3 Description of Executive Order 12073.

Executive Order 12073 requires executive agencies to emphasize procurement set-asides in labor surplus areas. The Secretary of Labor is responsible under this order for classifying and designating labor surplus areas.

[44 FR 1689, Jan. 5, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 15616, Apr. 12, 1983]
#### George Hess, appellant, v. Sidney Dodge et al., appellees.

Filed June 4, 1908.

No. 15,178.

1. Pleading: General Denial. A general denial puts in issue every material averment in the petition.

2. School Districts: Injunction: Pleading: Burden of Proof. Where, in an action against a school district to enjoin the changing of the site of the school house and the appropriation of the moneys of the district for the erection of a school house on the . new site, plaintiff alleges that “he is a resident taxpayer and qualified voter” of said district, such allegation is a material allegation, without which the petition would be demurrable; and, where such petition is met by a general denial, the burden is upon the plaintiff to prove such allegation.

Appeal from the district court for Red Willow county: Robert C. Orr, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*36*Morían, Ritchie & Wolf*and *Starr & Reeder,*for appellants.

*Boyle & Eldred, contra.*

Fawcett, C.

This is a suit for an injunction to restrain the defendants from changing the site of the school house in school district No. 4, Red Willow county, from appropriating the moneys of the district for the erection of a school house on said new site, and for other relief of a similar character. From a decree favorable to defendants, plaintiff appeals.

In paragraph 1 of his petition plaintiff alleges: “(1) That he is a resident taxpayer and qualified voter of school district No. 4 of Red Willow county, Nebraska.” This was a material allegation, without which the petition would have been demurrable. The answer of defendants is a general denial. So far as the record discloses, plaintiff did not attend upon the trial of the case, and there is an entire absence of proof even tending to show that he is a taxpayer or qualified voter, or even a resident, of the school district. Plaintiff having utterly failed to prove this material allegation of his petition, which stood denied by defendants’ answer, we must decline to examine further into the case.

We therefore recommend that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Calkins and Root, CC., concur.

By the Court: For the reasons stated in the foregoing opinion, the judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY QUICKLOOK CRITERIA PARAMETERS May. 8, 2012 Report Request ID: 990350 Report Code: AMP450

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: SKV

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 24 24 24 24 24 24 003

005 013 025 027 510 44201

44201 44201 44201 44201 44201 1 1 1 1 1 1 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

SELECTED OPTIONS EVENTS PROCESSING MERGE PDF FILES WORKFILE DELIMITER Option Type Option Value EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

YES , SORT ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

PARAMETER_CODE STATE_CODE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID POC DATES EDT_ID GLOBAL DATES 2011 Start Date End Date 2011 Tribal Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Standard Description Ozone 1-hour Daily 2005May. 8, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 1of 4 EXCEPTIONAL DATA TYPES EDT DESCRIPTION 0 1 2 5 NO EVENTS EVENTS EXCLUDED EVENTS INCLUDED EVENTS WITH CONCURRENCE EXCLUDEDMay. 8, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page2of 4 Ozone (44201) Maryland Parts per million (007) SITE ID P

O C PQAO CITY COUNTY ADDRESS YEAR METH VALID DAYS MEAS 1ST

MAX 1-HR CERTEDT 24-003-0014 24-005-1007 24-005-3001 24-013-0001 24-025-1001 24-025-9001 24-510-0054 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1002 1002 1002 1002 1002 1002 1002 Not in a city Cockeysville Essex Not in a city Edgewood Not in a city Baltimore Anne Arundel

Baltimore Baltimore Carroll Harford Harford Baltimore (City) Davidsonville Recreation Center, 3801 Queen Anne Bridge Road Padonia Elementary School, 9834 Greenside Drive 600 Dorsey Avenue 1300 W. Old Liberty Road Edgewood Chemical Biological Center (APG), Waehli Road 3560 Aldino Road Furley E.S. Recreational Center, 4633 Furley Avenue. 2011

2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 2011 047 091 047 047 091 047 091 208 195 203 210 209 201 203 .111

.113 .112 .099 .131 .114 .107 .110

.103 .109 .089 .121 .114 .106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2ND MAX 1-HR 1-HOUR NUM DAYS REQ 214 214 214 214 214 214 214 .102 .103 .106 .085 .118 .113 .094 3RD MAX 1-HR .098

.094 .103 .085 .118 .108 .092 4TH MAX 1-HR DAY MAX> STD 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 EST DAYS> STD 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 MISS DAYS< STD1 2 6 2 3 2 1May. 8, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page3of 4 44201 44201 047

091 INSTRUMENTAL

INSTRUMENTAL ULTRA VIOLET ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION ABSORBTN PARAMETER METHOD

CODE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS METHOD METHODS USED IN THIS REPORTMay. 8, 2012

Note: The * indicates that the mean does not satisfy summary criteria. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM QUICK LOOK REPORT (AMP450)



### Page 4of 4 PQAOS USED IN THIS REPORT PQAO AGENCY DESCRIPTION 1002 State Of Maryland Air Management Administration
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 183

 189

 194

 211

 249

 230

 165

 183

 187

 182

 231

 155

 110

 114

 125

 129

 135

 140

 159

 158

 173

 183

 176

 166

 165

 158

 160

 170

 179

 185

 193

 152

 156

 159

 162

 187

 158

 106

 97

 107

 79

 88

 108

 103

 103

 116

 117

 120

 114

 121

 103

 127

 145

 143

 147

 136

 133

 123

 124

 128

 132

 131

 162

 167

 171

 184

 215

 189

 138

 131

 152

 128

 173

 121

 107

 108

 120

 124

 130

 129

 140

 140

 154

 164

 163

 157

 154

 149

 145

 150

 160

 167

 171

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 1, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 968.33

 968.06

 967.83

 967.53

 967.47

 967.35

 967.27

 967.23

 967.22

 967.19

 967.15

 967.17

 967.25

 967.22

 967.27

 967.30

 967.32

 967.33

 967.28

 967.23

 967.15

 967.14

 967.15

 967.09

 967.05

 967.03

 966.99

 966.88

 966.81

 966.87

 966.77

 2,195.4

 2,190.5

 2,186.3

 2,180.9

 2,179.8

 2,177.6

 2,176.1

 2,175.4

 2,175.2

 2,174.7

 2,173.9

 2,174.3

 2,175.8

 2,175.2

 2,176.1

 2,176.7

 2,177.0

 2,177.2

 2,176.3

 2,175.4

 2,173.9

 2,173.8

 2,173.9

 2,172.8

 2,172.1

 2,171.8

 2,171.0

 2,169.0

 2,167.8

 2,168.9

 2,167.1

STORAGE

-4.2

-4.9

-4.2

-5.5

-1.1

-2.2

-1.5

-0.7

-0.2

-0.5

-0.7

+0.4

+1.5

-0.5

+0.9

+0.5

+0.4

+0.2

-0.9

-0.9

-1.5

-0.2

+0.2

-1.1

-0.7

-0.4

-0.7

-2.0

-1.3

+1.1

-1.8

CHANGE

 3,114

 2,189

 3,069

 2,350

 3,715

 2,858

 2,851

 3,110

 3,043

 3,530

 3,120

 3,412

 3,573

 2,731

 3,729

 3,091

 3,531

 3,614

 3,091

 2,967

 2,653

 3,402

 3,586

 3,306

 3,523

 3,595

 2,642

 2,406

 4,548

 5,880

 4,260

INFLOW

 5,074

 4,556

 5,015

 4,951

 4,115

 3,879

 3,505

 3,397

 2,974

 3,661

 3,407

 3,094

 2,759

 2,872

 3,100

 2,736

 3,257

 3,394

 3,383

 3,346

 3,307

 3,414

 3,414

 3,685

 3,794

 3,655

 2,918

 3,398

 5,181

 5,269

 5,113

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 161

 123

 166

 150

 150

 80

 80

 80

 160

 144

 80

 134

 80

 134

 171

 80

 91

 128

 166

 80

 80

 80

 80

 171

 96

 123

 91

 11

 5

 64

 59

C.F.S.

 .30

 .23

 .31

 .28

 .28

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .30

 .27

 .15

 .25

 .15

 .25

 .32

 .15

 .17

 .24

 .31

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .15

 .32

 .18

 .23

 .17

 .02

 .01

 .12

 .11

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .97

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2001 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 16, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -32.5 102,489 115,623 0 0 3,298 6.17 .97

ACRE-FEET -32,500 203,287 229,338 0 0 6,542

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 229,338

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 229,338

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .97

JULY 1, 2001 1.96

 2,199.6

Table 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,809
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (2,545)
<INVENTORY>                                     73,106
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,159
<PP&E>                                          48,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,395
<BONDS>                                        314,578
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,121
<OTHER-SE>                                    (136,415)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,210
<SALES>                                         88,411
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,411
<CGS>                                           55,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (1,049)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,323)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,506)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis, President,
Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President

Date:		May 15, 2006
Exhibit 32.2 

**Certification Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003 (the“Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: 

    (1)                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

    (2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

April 14, 2004 

/s/Steven C. Ramsey

StevenC. Ramsey
(No. 4343

#### Ted E. Davies, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February*9, *1951.*

Frank B. Deyo, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel and William H. Sumpter, Assistant Attorneys General, for Respondent.

• Lansden, J.

The facts in this case have been stipulated, and such stipulation is hereby approved.

Claimant, Ted E. Davies, was employed by respondent from September, 1946, until October 26, 1948, in the Division of Waterways of the Department of Public Works and Buildings. Claimant actually worked only through October 20, 1948, the remainder of his period of employment being used in annual leave.

During his period of employment claimant was paid a regular salary, and, in addition, while assigned to duty away from his official headquarters, he was entitled to reimbursement for actual expenses incurred, subject to a maximum limitation, and to the rules and regulations of the Department of Finance.

For the twenty-day period in October, 1948 that claimant actually worked, he was assigned to duty away from his official headquarters, working with a surveying party in the vicinity of LaGrange, Illinois.

Before the. end of October, 1948, and while using up his annual leave, claimant submitted an expense account for $110.00 covering the entire month. He was promptly informed that such amount could not be paid since he *229had actually worked only through October 20, 1948, and he was requested to revise his expense account downward to reflect this fact.

After considerable exchange of correspondence, claimant, who was none too prompt in acceding to requests therein, finally submitted a revised expense account, which was received by the Division of Waterways on December 1, 1949. He was then informed that the appropriation to pay such expenses had lapsed, and, therefore, payment could not be made.

From the stipulation, it is apparent that the Division of Waterways insisted that claimant’s expense account of $110.00 for the entire month of October, 1948 be reduced proportionally to reflect the fact that he actually worked only twenty of the thirty-one days in the month of October, 1948. Claimant finally did this in substance, and he is, therefore, entitled to an award of twenty thirty-firsts of $110.00 or the sum of $70.97.

An award is entered in favor of claimant, Ted E. Davies, for $70.97.