alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| (1) | The      Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or      78o(d)); and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Michael V. Shustek         |
|-------------------------------------|
| Michael      V. Shustek             |
| Chief      Executive Officer        |
| Vestin      Realty Mortgage I, Inc. |

| /s/      Rocio Revollo             |
|------------------------------------|
| Rocio      Revollo                 |
| Chief      Financial Officer       |
| Vestin      Realty Mortgage I,Inc. |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,894

 2,143

 1,834

 2,144

 2,665

 2,817

 3,196

 3,895

 2,172

 1,899

 1,920

 2,627

 3,771

 3,328

 4,608

 1,615

 1,527

 3,201

 3,376

 3,797

 3,588

 3,071

 2,183

 2,222

 3,488

 3,443

 4,012

 3,708

 3,400

 2,196

 2,061

 81,170

 79,861

 77,904

 75,751

 74,000

 72,832

 71,867

 71,309

 71,444

 69,935

 68,243

 66,655

 65,817

 66,109

 65,965

 67,045

 65,227

 63,416

 63,286

 63,329

 63,770

 63,990

 63,708

 62,596

 61,577

 61,812

 61,992

 62,704

 63,091

 63,167

 62,095

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: August 1, 2016

 84,064

 82,004

 79,738

 77,895

 76,665

 75,649

 75,063

 75,204

 73,616

 71,834

 70,163

 69,282

 69,588

 69,437

 70,573

 68,660

 66,754

 66,617

 66,662

 67,126

 67,358

 67,061

 65,891

 64,818

 65,065

 65,255

 66,004

 66,412

 66,491

 65,363

 64,156

 6,491,000

 6,470,000

 6,449,000

 6,427,000

 6,406,000

 6,385,000

 6,363,000

 6,342,000

 6,321,000

 6,300,000

 6,278,000

 6,257,000

 6,236,000

 6,214,000

 6,193,000

 6,172,000

 6,150,000

 6,129,000

 6,108,000

 6,086,000

 6,065,000

 6,044,000

 6,022,000

 6,001,000

 5,980,000

 5,959,000

 5,937,000

 5,916,000

 5,895,000

 5,873,000

 5,852,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 85,442
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 130.40

 129.68

 129.39

 129.33

 130.18

 129.72

 130.27

 130.14

 130.28

 129.76

 129.98

 129.93

 129.72

 129.32

 128.81

 127.92

 129.07

 129.80

 129.89

 129.96

 129.41

 129.56

 128.39

 129.45

 130.14

 129.73

 129.77

 129.58

 623

 549

 521

 515

 599

 553

 609

 595

 610

 556

 579

 573

 553

 514

 468

 394

 491

 560

 569

 577

 523

 537

 432

 527

 595

 554

 557

 539

STORAGE

-11

-74

-28

-6

+84

-46

+56

-14

+15

-54

+23

-6

-20

-39

-46

-74

+97

+69

+9

+8

-54

+14

-105

+95

+68

-41

+3

-18

CHANGE

82

95

188

164

151

346

1,855

443

714

554

839

800

706

709

682

641

1,897

3,415

3,815

5,804

9,304

7,893

7,216

6,702

5,825

4,944

4,686

4,197

INFLOW

 29

 88

 158

 125

 73

 319

 1,801

 394

 665

 541

 782

 757

 660

 676

 655

 621

 1,800

 3,322

 3,759

 5,774

 9,295

 7,831

 7,214

 6,606

 5,746

 4,920

 4,632

 4,151

PUTAH

 59

 44

 44

 42

 36

 50

 26

 56

 41

 40

 45

 45

 56

 53

 50

 57

 48

 58

 51

 26

 36

 55

 55

 48

 45

 45

 52

 55

PUTAH

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

C.F.S.

 .04

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .05

 .00

 .08

 .01

 .04

 .12

 .21

 .14

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .05

 .00

 .07

 .00

 .02

 .05

 .10

 .07

 .08

 .08

 .12

 .07

INCHES

 .00

 .76

 .83

 .16

 .02

 .78

 2.32

 .38

 .09

 .92

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .24

 .47

 2.30

 .15

 1.17

 1.86

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2017 RUN DATE: 03/01/2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -95 74,667 1,318 73,394 1 1.65 12.56

ACRE-FEET -95 148,102 2,614 145,577 2

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 145,577

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 2,614

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 12.56

JULY 1, 2016 39.19

 634

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 39.19
(No. 74-CC-18

#### Volkswagon South Shore, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1973.*

Volkswagon South Shore, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 663.160 Are there particular core services an individual must receive before receiving intensive services under WIA section 134(d)(3)? ( a ) Yes, at a minimum, an individual must receive at least one core service, such as an initial assessment or job search and placement assistance, before receiving intensive services. The initial assessment provides preliminary information about the individual's skill levels, aptitudes, interests, and supportive services needs. The job search and placement assistance helps the individual determine whether he or she is unable to obtain employment, and thus requires more intensive services to obtain employment. The decision on which core services to provide, and the timing of their delivery, may be made on a case-by-case basis at the local level depending upon the needs of the participant.
( b ) A determination of the need for intensive services under § 663.220, as established by the initial assessment or the individual's inability to obtain employment through the core services provided, must be contained in the participant's case file.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

DAY

 17,308

 17,197

 16,987

 17,089

 16,987

 16,622

 16,289

 16,014

 15,776

 15,450

 15,158

 14,846

 14,548

 14,263

 13,962

 13,736

 13,482

 13,147

 12,877

 12,599

 12,322

 12,068

 11,912

 11,674

 11,433

 11,423

 11,433

 11,287

 11,217

 26,001

 25,764

 25,561

 25,393

 25,592

 26,024

 26,448

 26,833

 27,159

 27,562

 27,923

 28,318

 28,696

 29,071

 29,467

 29,816

 30,209

 30,665

 31,072

 31,467

 31,866

 32,268

 32,569

 32,969

 33,370

 33,586

 33,812

 34,211

 34,527

STORAGE - A.F. 

 43,309

 42,961

 42,548

 42,482

 42,579

 42,646

 42,737

 42,847

 42,935

 43,012

 43,081

 43,164

 43,244

 43,334

 43,429

 43,552

 43,691

 43,812

 43,949

 44,066

 44,188

 44,336

 44,481

 44,643

 44,803

 45,009

 45,245

 45,498

 45,744

707

793

638

420

495

510

414

488

422

530

430

345

527

459

335

477

497

437

421

597

472

344

510

419

489

387

571

508

326

517

618

430

387

544

544

460

543

466

569

465

387

567

504

383

539

567

498

490

656

534

419

583

501

570

491

690

636

450

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2020 FULL NATURAL FLOW AT NEW MELONES DAM RUN DATE: 03/01/2020

TOTALS +2,058 15,008

* October 1, 29,768

 151.6

 152.8

 153.7

 154.4

 155.5

 156.6

 157.5

 158.6

 159.5

 160.6

 161.6

 162.3

 163.4

 164.4

 165.2

 166.3

 167.4

 168.4

 169.4

 170.7

 171.7

 172.5

 173.7

 174.7

 175.8

 176.8

 178.2

 179.4

 180.3

DONNELLS

RES

BEARDSLEY

RES

2019 TO DATE

NEW

MELONES

INFLOW

C.F.S

NATURAL

RIVER

C.F.S

ACCUM *

FULL

NATURAL

1000 A.F.

RESERVOIR

TOTAL

-377

-348

-413

-66

+97

+67

+91

+110

+88

+77

+69

+83

+80

+90

+95

+123

+139

+121

+137

+117

+122

+148

+145

+162

+160

+206

+236

+253

+246

CHANGE

A.F. C.F.S.

-190

-175

-208

-33

+49

+34

+46

+55

+44

+39

+35

+42

+40

+45

+48

+62

+70

+61

+69

+59

+62

+75

+73

+82

+81

+104

+119

+128

+124
Exhibit 10.2

Amendment No. 1, dated October 9, 2008, to a certain Patent Assignment And License Agreement, dated May 21, 2008 (the
Agreement), by and between Ribotask ApS, having its offices at Søndre Boulevard 44, 3, 5000 Odense C, Denmark, being a corporation established under the laws of Denmark (Assignor), and MDRNA, Inc. (f/k/a Nastech
Pharmaceutical Company Inc.), having its offices at 3830 Monte Villa Pkwy, Bothell, WA 98021, being a corporation established under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America (Assignee).

WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify the schedule of payments to be made under Section 3.2.1 of the Agreement;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

1. The payment schedule set forth in Section 3.2.1 of the Agreement is hereby modified in its entirety as follows:



|                                  |  |        |         |       
|--------------------------------- |  | ------ | ------- | ------
|Date                              |  | Amount |        
|Execution of Definitive Agreement |  | $      | 50,000  | (paid)
|August 1, 2008                    |  | $      | 50,000  | (paid)
|Execution of Amendment No. 1      |  | $      | 100,000 |       
|December 30, 2008                 |  | $      | 100,000 |       
|February 1, 2009                  |  | $      | 200,000 |       

2. Except as
specifically modified by this Amendment No. 1, all provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties hereto has caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above
written.



|                             |  |                     |  |                        |  |     |  |              
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------
|ASSIGNOR: 
Ribotask ApS      |  |                     |  | ASSIGNEE: 
MDRNA, Inc.
|                             |  |                     |  |                       
|By:                          |  | /s/ Jesper Wengel   |  |                        |  | By: |  | Bruce R. York
|Name: Jesper Wengel, Ph.D.   |  | Name: Bruce R. York
|Title: Chairman of the Board |  | Title: CFO         
|                             |  |                     |  |                       
|By:                          |  | /s/ Suzy Lena       |  |                        |  |     |  |              
|Name: Suzy Lena              |  |                     |  |                        |  |    
|Title: CEO                   |  |                     |  |                        |  |
#### § 670.993 How does Job Corps ensure that contract disputes will be resolved?

A dispute between DOL and a Job Corps contractor will be handled according to the Contract Disputes Act and applicable regulations.
#### SEEMAN, Appellant, v. STRANSKY, Respondent.

(238 N. W. 341.)

(File No. 7236.

Opinion filed October 19, 1931.)

*128
      *Crawford & Crawford,*of Huron, for Appellant.

*M. C. Cunningham,*of Highmore, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In this case certified cop)' of the notice of appeal was filed in this court on the 26th day of March, 1931, and thereafter a stipulation entered into by the respective counsel for appellant and respondent was filed, extending the time within which to serve and file appellant’s brief to the 29th day of May, 1931. Said brief has not been filed, nor have any other steps or proceeding been taken in the prosecution of this appeal. Therefore the said appeal will be deemed to have been abandoned, and the order appealed from is affirmed.
### §4822. Director of Diplomatic Security Service

Any such Diplomatic Security Service should be headed by a Director designated by the Secretary of State. The Director should be a career member of the Senior Foreign Service or the Senior Executive Service and should be qualified for the position by virtue of demonstrated ability in the areas of security, law enforcement, management, and public administration. Experience in management or operations abroad should be considered an affirmative factor in the selection of the Director.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title II, §202, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 858; Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §162(g)(8), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–236 substituted "Any such" for "The" in first sentence, struck out last sentence which read as follows: "The Director shall act under the supervision and direction of the Assistant Secretary for Diplomatic Security.", and directed the substitution of "should" for "shall" in first, third, and fourth sentences, which was executed to first, second, and third sentences to reflect the probable intent of Congress and the striking out of last sentence which also was the fourth sentence. See H.Rept. 103–126, pp. 168, 169.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–236 applicable with respect to officials, offices, and bureaus of Department of State when executive orders, regulations, or departmental directives implementing the amendments by sections 161 and 162 of Pub. L. 103–236 become effective, or 90 days after Apr. 30, 1994, whichever comes earlier, see section 161(b) of Pub. L. 103–236, as amended, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.
### §8754. Comprehensive strategy to promote Internet freedom and access to information in Iran

Not later than 90 days after August 10, 2012, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the heads of other Federal agencies, as appropriate, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a comprehensive strategy to—

(1) assist the people of Iran to produce, access, and share information freely and safely via the Internet, including in Farsi and regional languages;

(2) support the development of counter-censorship technologies that enable the citizens of Iran to undertake Internet activities without interference from the Government of Iran;

(3) increase the capabilities and availability of secure mobile and other communications through connective technology among human rights and democracy activists in Iran;

(4) provide resources for digital safety training for media and academic and civil society organizations in Iran;

(5) provide accurate and substantive Internet content in local languages in Iran;

(6) increase emergency resources for the most vulnerable human rights advocates seeking to organize, share information, and support human rights in Iran;

(7) expand surrogate radio, television, live stream, and social network communications inside Iran, including—

(A) by expanding Voice of America's Persian News Network and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty's Radio Farda to provide hourly live news update programming and breaking news coverage capability 24 hours a day and 7 days a week; and

(B) by assisting telecommunications and software companies that are United States persons to comply with the export licensing requirements of the United States for the purpose of expanding such communications inside Iran;

(8) expand activities to safely assist and train human rights, civil society, and democracy activists in Iran to operate effectively and securely;

(9) identify and utilize all available resources to overcome attempts by the Government of Iran to jam or otherwise deny international satellite broadcasting signals;

(10) expand worldwide United States embassy and consulate programming for and outreach to Iranian dissident communities;

(11) expand access to proxy servers for democracy activists in Iran; and

(12) discourage telecommunications and software companies from facilitating Internet censorship by the Government of Iran.

(Pub. L. 112–158, title IV, §414, Aug. 10, 2012, 126 Stat. 1256.)
### §286ee. International cooperation

The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of the Fund to propose that the Fund adopt the following policies with respect to international lending:

(1) In its consultations with a member government on its economic policies pursuant to article IV of the Articles of Agreement of the Fund, the Fund should—

(A) intensify its examination of the trend and volume of external indebtedness of private and public borrowers in the member country and comment, as appropriate, in its report to the Executive Board from the viewpoint of the contribution of such borrowings to the economic stability of the borrower; and

(B) consider to what extent and in what form these comments might be made available to the international banking community and the public.

(2) As part of any Fund-approved stabilization program, the Fund should give consideration to placing limits on public sector external short- and long-term borrowing.

(3) As a part of its annual report, and at such times as it may consider desirable, the Fund should publish its evaluation of the trend and volume of international lending as it affects the economic situation of lenders, borrowers, and the smooth functioning of the international monetary system.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §47, as added Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title VIII, §809], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1274.)
#### Laura A. Goodrich *et al. v.*Martin B. Thompson, Admr.

*Practice—application to set aside sale*— *no evidence in the record.*In the . absence from the record of any evidence in support of an application to set aside a sale had under a decree of foreclosure, for certain alleged irregularities therein, the decision of the court below denying the application will be affirmed. In such case it will be presumed no testimony was heard.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Ford county.

On the 1st day of August, 1874, Martin B. Thompson, administrator, exhibited his bill in chancery in the court below, against Laura A. Goodrich, Robert Frew and Calvin H. Frew, for the foreclosure of a mortgage. At the April term, 1875, of that court, a decree *pro confesso*was entered against the defendants, and a sale of the mortgaged premises was ordered to be made by the master in chancery. The master sold the premises, in obedience to the decree. Subsequently, the defendants presented to the judge, in vacation, a petition, asking that the master be directed not to convey the premises to the purchaser, and that the sale be set aside, alleging that two of the defendants against whom the default had been taken in the foreclosure suit had never been served with process, nor entered any appearance therein. The petitioners also alleged various irregularities in the conduct of the sale by the master. The opinion discloses the result of the application.

Mr. Calvin H. Frew, for the appellants.

Mr. J. R. Kinnear, for the appellee.

Per Curiam :

Petitioners made an application to the judge of the circuit court, in vacation, to have set aside the sale of certain lands that had been made under a decree of foreclosure. On the hearing, at chambers, the judge denied the prayer of *548the petition, but continued the matter to the next succeeding term of court, when a formal order was entered of record dismissing the petition. There was no error in that decision.

It does not appear petitioners offered any evidence to sustain the allegations of their petition, nor did they ask any further time to present evidence. There was, therefore, nothing the court could do but to dismiss the petition, as was done. If any evidence was, in fact, offered to sustain the petition, it was the duty of petitioners to preserve it in the record; otherwise, this court will presume none was submitted.

In this view of the case, it is immaterial whether there is, or was, any certificate of evidence, or bill of exceptions preserving the affidavits it is alleged were submitted in opposition to the petition, and we need not remark upon the motion made in this court to strike out the amended record.

The decree will be affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 255

 249

 211

 210

 188

 196

 192

 198

 194

 222

 222

 247

 208

 186

 177

 279

 279

 226

 217

 203

 251

 248

 291

 340

 349

 257

 193

 194

 173

 173

 165

 179

 175

 173

 171

 169

 166

 163

 162

 161

 161

 161

 160

 159

 159

 158

 158

 154

 155

 155

 153

 152

 151

 151

 152

 147

 145

 149

 147

 146

 149

 151

 188

 181

 180

 180

 173

 174

 170

 169

 167

 170

 171

 174

 167

 164

 162

 170

 178

 163

 166

 161

 165

 167

 174

 188

 182

 165

 155

 154

 153

 153

 155

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 663.505 What are eligible providers of training services? ( a ) Eligible providers of training services are described in WIA section 122. They are those entities eligible to receive WIA title I-B funds to provide training services to eligible adult and dislocated worker customers.
( b ) In order to provide training services under WIA title I-B, a provider must meet the requirements of this subpart and WIA section 122. ( 1 ) These requirements apply to the use of WIA title I adult and dislocated worker funds to provide training: ( i ) To individuals using ITA's to access training through the eligible provider list; and
( ii ) To individuals for training provided through the exceptions to ITA's described at § 663.430 (a)(2) and (a)(3).
( 2 ) These requirements apply to all organizations providing training to adult and dislocated workers, including: ( i ) Postsecondary educational institutions providing a program described in WIA section 122(a)(2)(A)(ii);
( ii ) Entities that carry out programs under the National Apprenticeship Act (29 U.S.C. 50 *et seq.*);
( iii ) Other public or private providers of a program of training services described in WIA section 122(a)(2)(C);
( iv ) Local Boards, if they meet the conditions of WIA section 117(f)(1); and
( v ) Community-based organizations and other private organizations providing training under § 663.430.
( c ) Provider eligibility procedures must be established by the Governor, as required by this subpart. Different procedures are described in WIA for determinations of “initial” and “subsequent” eligibility. Because the processes are different, they are discussed separately.