alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# RECEIVED FEB 282017 

## u.s. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION

## HEARING**DOr~** 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS lJ 

### WASHINGTON, DC 

### ***************************** In the Matter of: 

### * MACH ONE AIRCHARTERS, INC. 

### * Docket No. FAA-2015-0643 

## * Case No. 2014WP210018 

### * ALJ-RAWALD 

### * 

### ***************************** TO: The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge, and Respondent, through counsel: 

### COMPLAINANT'S OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS COMES NOW, Complainant, by and through counsel, objects onthe following grounds to certain ofRespondent's proposed exhibits, which were received by the undersigned on February 22, 2017. Complainant objects to Respondent's 5 videos, identified as 009.mpg, 01 O.mpg, Oll.mpg, and 013.mpg and Respondent's 5 photographs identified as OOl.jpg, 002.jpg, 003.jpg, 004.jpg, and 008.jpg. Theseproposed exhibits are inadmissible, and no evidence can be producedto satisfY the requirement ofauthentication. Respectfully submitted, Naomi Tsuda

Assistant ChiefCounsel For Enforcement

# By:~

LisaToscano, Attorney Enforcement Division, Western Team email: 

### Lisa.M.Toscano(illfaa.gov Telephone: (310) 725-7100 (main)· (310) 725-7110 (direct) (310) 725-6816 (fax)
Dated: February 24, 2017DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-0643 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this date I have sent a copy ofthe foregoing COMPLAINANT'S OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS by U.S. Certified Mail- return receipt requested and by either facsimile transmission or electronic mail, as indicated, to the following: The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 US Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 Fax: (202) 366-7536 Steven L. Graff, Esq. Steven L. Graff, Inc. 43399 Calle DeVelardo Temecula, CA 92592 Email: aviationcounsel!lilaol.com I further certify that onthis date I have served the original and one copy ofthe foregoing COMPLAINANT'S OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENT'S PROPOSED EXHIBITS by U.S. Certified Mail- return receipt requested and facsimile, addressed as follows: Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 Fax: (202) 267-1293

Dated: February 24, 2017 /1

**~** '

**~I**



# /~nt-· J /I I '. 

# L'>-f/

**z__~ P""L.c/~** 

Antonia Garcia, Program Analyst Enforcement Division, WesternTeam Lawndale, CA 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.3 Territory of Guam.

This subpart does not apply to temporary employment in the Territory of Guam, except that an employer who applies for a temporary labor certification for a job opportunity on Guam will need to obtain a prevailing wage from the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) in accordance with § 655.10, subject to the transfer of authority to set the prevailing wage for a job opportunity on Guam to DOL in title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations. DOL does not certify to DHS the temporary employment of H-2B nonimmigrant foreign workers, or enforce compliance with the provisions of the H-2B visa program, in the Territory of Guam.
M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW of SAN PATRICIO COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 26th day of 

February, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

Gumaro Rosales & Velma Rosales 

and All Occupants,

Appellant,

v.

Green Tree Servicing LLC. Appellee.

CAUSE NO. 13-15-00032-CV (Tr.Ct.No. 10372)

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION in accordance with its opinion. Costs of 

the appeal are adjudged against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 26, 2015.



WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Thirteenth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Hon. Rogelio Valdez, Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals, with the seal 

thereof affixed, at the City of Edinburg, Texas this 12th day of May, 2015.

Dorian E. Ramirez, CLERK
§ 618.305 The Trade Adjustment Assistance Program as a one-stop partner. ( a ) As provided by WIOA section 121(b)(1)(B)(vii), the TAA Program is a required one-stop partner under WIOA.
( b ) The State must ensure that the TAA Program complies with WIOA's one-stop partnership requirements at WIOA section 121(b)(1)(A)(i) through (v). This includes, among the other requirements, paying infrastructure costs where the TAA Program is being carried out.
( c ) The TAA Program must also comply with, and be a party to, the memorandum of understanding required under the regulations implementing WIOA at § 678.500 of this chapter, where the TAA Program is being carried out.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 915.52

 915.73

 915.93

 916.35

 916.53

 916.50

 916.52

 916.57

 916.72

 916.85

 916.92

 917.03

 917.18

 917.38

 917.52

 917.59

 917.64

 917.73

 917.78

 917.95

 917.90

 917.96

 918.02

 918.20

 918.44

 918.50

 918.69

 918.86

 919.14

 919.32

 919.37

 1,364.1

 1,366.9

 1,369.6

 1,375.2

 1,377.6

 1,377.2

 1,377.5

 1,378.2

 1,380.2

 1,381.9

 1,382.9

 1,384.3

 1,386.4

 1,389.1

 1,391.0

 1,391.9

 1,392.6

 1,393.8

 1,394.5

 1,396.8

 1,396.1

 1,396.9

 1,397.7

 1,400.2

 1,403.5

 1,404.3

 1,406.9

 1,409.2

 1,413.0

 1,415.5

 1,416.1

STORAGE

+2.1

+2.8

+2.7

+5.6

+2.4

-0.4

+0.3

+0.7

+2.0

+1.7

+0.9

+1.5

+2.0

+2.7

+1.9

+0.9

+0.7

+1.2

+0.7

+2.3

-0.7

+0.8

+0.8

+2.5

+3.3

+0.8

+2.6

+2.3

+3.8

+2.5

+0.7

CHANGE

 4,360

 4,453

 4,336

 5,785

 4,241

 2,731

 3,343

 3,323

 3,644

 3,371

 3,497

 3,745

 4,079

 3,953

 4,083

 3,568

 3,538

 3,727

 3,555

 4,350

 2,919

 3,857

 3,544

 4,483

 5,007

 3,818

 4,130

 4,082

 4,792

 4,328

 3,457

INFLOW

 3,276

 3,029

 2,987

 2,925

 3,006

 2,926

 3,204

 2,984

 2,613

 2,451

 2,979

 2,955

 2,994

 2,499

 3,069

 3,031

 3,117

 3,069

 3,158

 3,131

 3,212

 3,436

 3,130

 3,235

 3,344

 3,394

 2,790

 2,907

 2,824

 3,052

 3,060

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 8

 12

 4

 20

 16

 8

 4

 0

 16

 40

 44

 44

 63

 91

 60

 60

 80

 44

 56

 60

 48

 12

 4

 12

 16

 12

 36

 8

 40

 32

 52

C.F.S.

 .02

 .03

 .01

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .04

 .10

 .11

 .11

 .16

 .23

 .15

 .15

 .20

 .11

 .14

 .15

 .12

 .03

 .01

 .03

 .04

 .03

 .09

 .02

 .10

 .08

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .22

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2009 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 2, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +54.1 122,099 93,787 0 0 1,002 2.51 .51

ACRE-FEET +54,100 242,183 186,027 0 0 1,987

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 186,027

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 186,027

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .51

JULY 1, 2008 12.05

 1,362.0
#### § 422.420 May you inspect and copy our records related to the debt?

You may inspect and copy our records related to the debt. You must notify us of your intention to review our records. After you notify us, we will arrange with you the place and time the records will be available to you. At our discretion, we may send copies of the records to you.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPrototype Conflict Alerting Logic for Free FlightThis paper discusses the development of a prototype alerting system for a conceptual Free Flight environment. The concept assumes that datalink between aircraft is available and that conflicts are primarily resolved on the flight deck. Four alert stages are generated depending on the likelihood of a conflict. If the conflict is not resolved by the flight crews, Air Traffic Control is notified to take over separation authority. The alerting logic is based on probabilistic analysis through modeling of aircraft sensor and trajectory uncertainties. Monte Carlo simulations were used over a range of encounter situations to determine conflict probability. The four alert stages were then defined based on probability of conflict and on the number of avoidance maneuvers available to the flight crew. Preliminary results from numerical evaluations and from a piloted simulator study at NASA Ames Research Center are summarized.Document ID19980019279Acquisition SourceAmes Research CenterDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsYang, Lee C.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA United States)*Kuchar, James K.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1997Publication InformationPublisher: American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsSubject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberAIAA Paper 97-0220NASA/TM-97-207326NAS 1.15:207326Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace Sciences Meeting and ExhibitLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 6, 1997End Date: January 10, 1997Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980019279.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §3512. Repealed. Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XIV, §1422(b)(5), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–793

Section, Pub. L. 96–53, title IV, §413, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 377, related to establishment of Institute within International Development Cooperation Agency.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1401 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6561 of this title.
**Exhibit 10.34****Amendment to Executive/Management Employment Agreement**This Amendment is made as of May 1, 2005 by and among Alon USA GP, LLC (“Employer”) and YosefIsrael (“Executive”).Whereas, the Employer and Executive entered into that certain Executive/Management EmploymentAgreement dated as of September 1, 2000 (the “Employment Agreement”); andWhereas, it is necessary to amend the Employment Agreement to extend the term of the EmploymentAgreement and provide for additional provisions related to the title and capacity of the Executive.Now therefore, the parties agree as follows:1. In addition to capacity and title set forth in Section 1(b) of the Employment Agreement,Executive shall serve as Vice President of Mergers and Acquisitions of Alon USA Energy, Inc.,a Delaware corporation, the indirect parent of the Company.2. Notwithstanding Section 1(c) of the Employment Agreement, the initial term of employmentshall end on April 30, 2010; thereafter, the term shall renew automatically as provided inSection 1(c) of the Agreement.3. Except as set forth in this Amendment, nothing contained herein is intended to modify orotherwise affect the terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement which shall remain infull force and effect.In witness whereof, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered as of thedate first written above.Alon USA GP, LLC       By:  /s/ David Wiessman   Name: David Wiessman         Executive: /s/ Yosef Israel
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                     111,837,895
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,118,744
<ALLOWANCES>                                   174,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           137,913,254
<PP&E>                                      62,226,300
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,232,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             263,680,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,896,183
<BONDS>                                    203,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    60,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (20,215,266)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               263,680,917
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,984,403
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,814,960
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             630,196
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,249,088)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (14,249,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (14,249,088)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Leah Goldberg et al., Appellants, *v.*P. Ballantine & Sons, Respondent.

First Department,

February 2, 1948.

*218*Jeremiah A. O’Leary*of counsel *(David Lieberman,*attorney), for appellants.

*Arnold LaGuardia*of counsel *(Nicholas J. Ferri*with him on the brief; *Grant, Clark & Fox,*attorneys), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendant delivered to plaintiff wife, a delicatessen store owner, several cases of beer. Her testimony is that four days later when she removed a bottle from one of the cases it exploded in her hand; that up to that time neither the case nor any of the bottles in the case had been disturbed. Plaintiff husband testified that immediately after the accident he examined the eleven remaining bottles in the case and found two broken and that about a quarter of the contents had seeped out of another bottle. Defendant’s superintendent in charge of the brewery, called as a witness by the plaintiffs, testified to the defendant’s bottling process, including the fact that the bottles were dropped into the cases, the drop being fourteen inches, and that sometimes bottles are thereby broken. No inspection of the bottles was made after the drop.

Dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiffs’ case was error. The evidence submitted by plaintiffs would entitle them to go to the jury. The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.

Peck, P. J., G-lennon, Dobe, Van Voobhis and Shientag, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.
§ 680.910 When may supportive services be provided to participants? ( a ) Supportive services may only be provided to individuals who are: ( 1 ) Participating in career or training services as defined in WIOA secs. 134(c)(2) and (3); and
( 2 ) Unable to obtain supportive services through other programs providing such services.
( b ) Supportive services only may be provided when they are necessary to enable individuals to participate in career service or training activities.
(No. 4265

#### Roscoe A. Hopkins, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 13, 1950.*

Stone and Fowler, and Omer W. Jones, Jr., Attorneys for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney- General, for Respondent.

SCHUMAN, C. J.

The claimant, Roscoe A. Hopkins, was on February 4, 1949, employed by the respondent as a guard at the Illinois State Penitentiary, Menard, Illinois. On February 4, 1949, while sorting hogs on the farm of the respondent at Menard, the claimant slipped and fell -on *134ice covered ground. As a result of this fall, the claimant fractured his left wrist.

The claim was filed within the time provided by law and notice of the injury was immediate. The only question raised by the respondent was whether or not the accidental injury arose out of and in the course of the employment of the claimant.

The evidence discloses that the accidental injury did arise out of the course of employment of the claimant, so there are no jurisdictional questions to be considered by the court.

The evidence further showed claimant’s yearly wage, preceding the accident, was $2,580.00.

Respondent furnished all. medical and hospital services.

The evidence discloses that it was necessary to operate on the left arm of claimant after it was set by Dr. Garris. The operation was performed by Dr. James A. Weatherly at St. Andrew’s Hospital, Murphysboro, Illinois. The X-Rays showed a fracture of the left radius of the distal end in the wrist. Claimant sustained permanent partial disability to the left hand as a result of the injury, and the estimate was fixed at about 50%. This conclusion being drawn from the testimony of Dr. Weatherly, and the examination by the Commissioner.

Dr. Weatherly testified that the condition found, with reference to the disability mentioned, would be permanent.

The claimant, although off some time, was paid full salary, and there was no claim made for temporary total disability.

The testimony at the hearing was taken and tran- ■ scribed by Imogene Ward Steph, and she has submitted *135a statement for $54.93, which the Court finds to be reasonable.

On the basis of the record, we make the following award:

> For 50 per cent permanent partial specific loss of the use of the left hand for a period of 85 weeks at $19.50 per week or a total of $1,657.50. Claimant was overpaid for non-productive time the sum of $480.92, which deducted from the award leaves a balance of $1,176.58, all of which is accrued and is payable forthwith.

An award is entered in favor of Imogene Ward Steph for stenographic services in the amount of $54.93, which is payable forthwith.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

The undersigned, Robert Coale, President and Chief Executive Officer of Giant Oil & Gas Inc. (the “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: June 26, 2006

 

 

| By: | /s/ Robert Coale |  
Name:

Robert Coale

 
Title:

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

(Principal Executive Officer

 
 

and Principal Financial Officer)

 
 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

  |
|-----|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
### SERVED : DECEMBE R16 , 201 ] U.S . DEPARTMEN T OFTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASFirNGTON , DC I N THE MATTEROF TIFFIN AIRE l"NC. FA A DOCKE T NO . |T 0 B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) FDMSNO . rAA-2011-100 7 

### .V.^RARTMEN TO F -'••^•KEiOFERATiCN S 20i l OEi : i q An : ij b



### NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2010-GL-70-0256 ) ha s been assigne dto Administrativ e La w Judg e J.E . Sullivan . All futur e pleading s an

dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n the Judge , the FA A Hearin g Docket , andth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

lie A . Yode

r Chie f Administrativ e La'

^ Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFDMSNo . FAA-2011-100 7 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention ; Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Bradle y W . Newman , Presiden t Tiffi n .'Xir

e Inc. . Responden I Senec aCount y Airpor t 177 8 Wes t

Stat e Rout e 22 4 Tiffin , O H 4488 3 TEL : 419-447-426 3 FAX : 419-447-404 2 Kat e Barber , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AGL- 7 Grea t Lake s Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t

Devo n Avenu e DcsPlaines,l L6001 8 TEL : 847-294-786 2 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Adminisirativ e la w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

Service wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier, use th

e followin g address : l-edcra

l Aviatio n Administration , 60

0 Independence Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , ID C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .



### - 2 -
§ 664.320 Does the requirement that at least 30 percent of youth funds be used to provide activities to out-of-school youth apply to all youth funds? ( a ) Yes, the 30 percent requirement applies to the total amount of all funds allocated to a local area under WIA section 128(b)(2)(A) or (b)(3), except for local area expenditures for administrative purposes under 20 CFR 667.210(a)(2).
( b ) Although it is not necessary to ensure that 30 percent of such funds spent on summer employment opportunities (or any other particular element of the youth program) are spent on out-of-school youth, the funds spent on these activities are included in the total to which the 30 percent requirement applies.
( c ) There is a limited exception, at WIA section 129(c)(4)(B), under which certain small States may apply to the Secretary to reduce the minimum amount that must be spent on out-of-school youth. (WIA sec. 129(c)(4).)