alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §283o. Increase in authorized capital stock and additional subscriptions of members thereto; increase in resources of Fund for Special Operations and contributions thereto; United States share; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is hereby authorized to vote in favor of the two resolutions proposed by the Governors at their annual meeting in April 1970 and now pending before the Board of Governors of the Bank, which provide for (1) an increase in the authorized capital stock to the Bank and additional subscriptions of members thereto and (2) an increase in the resources of the Fund for Special Operations and contributions thereto. Upon adoption of such resolutions the United States Governor is authorized to agree on behalf of the United States (1) to subscribe to eighty-two thousand three hundred and fifty-two shares of $10,000 par value of the increase in the authorized capital stock of the Bank of which sixty-seven thousand three hundred and fifty-two shall be callable shares and fifteen thousand shall be paid in and (2) to pay to the Fund for Special Operations an initial annual installment of $100,000,000 and, upon further authorization by the Congress two subsequent annual installments of $450,000,000 each, in accordance with and subject to the terms and conditions of such resolutions.

(b) There are hereby authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, the amounts necessary for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury of (1) three annual installments of $50,000,000 each for the United States subscription to paid-in capital stock of the Bank; (2) two installments of $336,760,000 each for the United States subscription to the callable capital stock of the Bank; and (3) one installment of $100,000,000 for the United States share of the increase in the resources of the Fund for Special Operations of the Bank.

(Pub. L. 86–147, §18, as added Pub. L. 91–599, ch. 2, §21(a), Dec. 30, 1970, 84 Stat. 1658.)
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.32 Submission of a modified application or job order. ( a ) *Review of a modified Application for Temporary Employment Certification or job order.* Upon receipt of a response to a Notice of Deficiency, including any modifications, the CO will review the response. The CO may issue one or more additional Notices of Deficiency before issuing a decision. The employer's failure to comply with a Notice of Deficiency, including not responding in a timely manner or not providing all required documentation, will result in a denial of the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification.*
( b ) *Acceptance of a modified Application for Temporary Employment Certification or job order.* If the CO accepts the modification(s) to the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and/or job order, the CO will issue a Notice of Acceptance to the employer. The CO will send a copy of the Notice of Acceptance to the SWA instructing it to make any necessary modifications to the not yet posted job order and, if applicable, to the employer's attorney or agent, and follow the procedure set forth in § 655.33.
( c ) *Denial of a modified Application for Temporary Employment Certification or job order.* If the CO finds the response to Notice of Deficiency unacceptable, the CO will deny the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* in accordance with the labor certification determination provisions in § 655.51.
( d ) *Appeal from denial of a modified Application for Temporary Employment Certification or job order.* The procedures for appealing a denial of a modified *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and/or job order are the same as for appealing the denial of a non-modified *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* outlined in § 655.61.
( e ) *Post acceptance modifications.* Irrespective of the decision to accept the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* the CO may require modifications to the job order at any time before the final determination to grant or deny the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* if the CO determines that the offer of employment does not contain all the minimum benefits, wages, and working condition provisions as set forth in § 655.18. The employer must make such modification, or certification will be denied under § 655.53. The employer must provide all workers recruited in connection with the job opportunity in the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* with a copy of the modified job order no later than the date work commences, as approved by the CO.
TS-EMLA10/20/30 

Attachment #3

Pt. 1, Sec. B 

CAS Inventory Expert Service Reports and Chemical Structures of the New Chemical 

Substances 

The following page gives the CAS Inventory Expert Service (IES) Reports on the new 

chemical substances. The chemical structures of the compounds are also provided.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1101 Definition of terms.

As used in this subpart—

*Calendar quarter* means a period of three full calendar months beginning with January, April, July, or October.

*Child* means someone who is not married, is not the head of a household, and is either under age 18 or is under age 22 and a student. (See § 416.1856)

*Couple* means an eligible individual and his or her eligible spouse.

*Current market value* means the price of an item on the open market in your locality.

*Federal benefit rate* means the monthly payment rate for an eligible individual or couple. It is the figure from which we subtract countable income to find out how much your Federal SSI benefit should be. The Federal benefit rate does not include the rate for any State supplement paid by us on behalf of a State.

*Institution* means an establishment which makes available some treatment or services beyond food and shelter to four or more persons who are not related to the proprietor. (See § 416.201)

*Spouse* means someone who lives with another person as that person's husband or wife. (See § 416.1806)

*We, Us,* or *Our* means the Social Security Administration.

*You* or *Your* means a person who is applying for, or already receiving, SSI benefits.

[45 FR 65547, Oct. 3, 1980, as amended at 50 FR 48573, Nov. 26, 1985; 51 FR 10616, Mar. 28, 1986; 60 FR 16375, Mar. 30, 1995]
§ 404.1530 Need to follow prescribed treatment. ( a ) *What treatment you must follow.* In order to get benefits, you must follow treatment prescribed by your medical source(s) if this treatment is expected to restore your ability to work.
( b ) *When you do not follow prescribed treatment.* If you do not follow the prescribed treatment without a good reason, we will not find you disabled or, if you are already receiving benefits, we will stop paying you benefits.
( c ) *Acceptable reasons for failure to follow prescribed treatment.* We will consider your physical, mental, educational, and linguistic limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) when determining if you have an acceptable reason for failure to follow prescribed treatment. The following are examples of a good reason for not following treatment: ( 1 ) The specific medical treatment is contrary to the established teaching and tenets of your religion.
( 2 ) The prescribed treatment would be cataract surgery for one eye, when there is an impairment of the other eye resulting in a severe loss of vision and is not subject to improvement through treatment.
( 3 ) Surgery was previously performed with unsuccessful results and the same surgery is again being recommended for the same impairment.
( 4 ) The treatment because of its magnitude (e.g., open heart surgery), unusual nature (e.g., organ transplant), or other reason is very risky for you; or
( 5 ) The treatment involves amputation of an extremity, or a major part of an extremity.
[45 FR 55584, Aug. 20, 1980, as amended at 59 FR 1635, Jan. 12, 1994; 82 FR 5871, Jan. 18, 2017]
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10046]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application; 
Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc.

    Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a 
regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a) authorizing the importation of such a 
substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the bulk 
manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice 
that on January 5, 2012, Catalent Pharma Solutions, Inc., 10381 Decatur 
Road, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19114, made application to the Drug 
Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of 
Noroxymorphone (9668), a basic class of controlled substance listed in 
schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance in 
finished dosage form for clinical trials.
    The import of the above listed basic class of controlled substance 
would be granted only for analytical testing and clinical trials. This 
authorization does not extend to the import of a finished FDA approved 
or non-approved dosage form for commercial distribution in the United 
States.
    Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled 
substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the 
proposed registration and may, at the same time, file a written request 
for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43, and in 
such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than May 29, 2012.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
Federal Register on September 23, 1975, 40 FR 43745-46, all applicants 
for registration to import a basic class of any controlled substance in 
schedules I or II are, and will continue to be, required to demonstrate 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, 
Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for such 
registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 21 CFR 
1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

     Dated: April 17, 2012.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-10046 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
No. 11,589.

#### City and County of Denver *v.*Murry.

Decided June 20, 1927.

Action, to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff.

*Reversed.*

1. Taxes and *Taxation*— Tax *Deed*— Validity. A tax deed issued under a sate held at a date later than that fixed *by*statute, no cause appearing therefor, is void.

2. ' *Tax Deed^-City not Estopped to Deny Validity.*The City and County of Denver held not estopped to deny the validity of a tax deed to property upon which it asserts iirior tax liens.

*Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. George F. Dunhlee, Judge.*

Mr. Henry E. May, Mr. Frank L. Hays, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George A. Chase, for defendant in error.

*En Banc.*

Mr. Justice Sheaeor

delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, brought this suit against plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as the defendant, to quiet plaintiff’s title to certain real estate in the City and County of Denver. The complaint wks in the usual form. The answer of defendant denied ownership of plaintiff and his right to possession, and set forth the interest claimed by defendant in the property as consisting of thirteen items of tax liens on account of certain unpaid general and *129special taxes, and asked that these liens he declared to he prior to the interest of plaintiff. Plaintiff claimed under a tax deed and averred that the liens, claimed by defendant, which attached to the property prior to the tax sale pursuant to which plaintiff’s tax deed issued, were invalid. Plaintiff also claims that defendant is estopped to deny plaintiff’s title. Trial to the court, findings and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant prosecutes error.

The plaintiff admits that if his tax deed is inoperative, the taxes, which became a lien prior to the sale pursuant to which his deed was issued, have not been extinguished.

The notice of sale and of application for plaintiff’s deed, shows that the time for redemption of the property from the sale for taxes “Will expire on October 31,1924,” while the fact was that the redemption period expired three years from November 25, 1914. Furthermore, plaintiff’s deed showed on its face that the sale was held on November 23, which was not the second Monday in November, 1914.

Plaintiff’s tax deed in this case, as in *Hamer v. Glenn,*75 Colo. 423, 226 Pac. 299; *Young v. Rohan,*77 Colo. 70, 234 Pac. 694; *Chase v. Bogardus,*78 Colo. 573, 243 Pac. 546; *City and County of Denver v. Bullock,*80 Colo. 9, 249 Pac. 498; *Wenig v. Lyons,*81 Colo. 6, 252 Pac. 889; and *Howe v.*Bennett, 81 Colo. 20, 253 Pac. 29 shows no cause, nor does the record contain any evidence of cause, for the postponement of the sale, and his deed is therefore void under the authority of those cases.

The defendant is not estopped to deny the validity of plaintiff’s deed. The *City and County of Denver v. Bullock, supra.*

The latter case is decisive of the questions raised in the instant case, and the judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed, with instructions to enter judgment for defendant.

Mr. Justice Denison not participating.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 18

- 00182

- CR

WADE HODGES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 147th District Court Travis County, Texas

Trial Court No. D

- 1

- DC

- 16

- 100356

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Wade Hodges has filed a motion to dismiss th is appeal. 1 As authorized by Rule

42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure , we grant the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: May 7, 2019

Date Decided: May 8, 2019

Do Not Publish

1 Originally appealed to the T hird Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Third Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 41.3

. Defense counsel filed an Anders brief in this matter. See Ander s v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 743

– 44 (1967). In conjunction with that brief, counsel filed a motion to withdraw. In light of appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal, we grant counsel’s request to withdraw from further representation of appellant in th is case

.
## Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re : Alexi Hinojosa Matos

No. 06

- 18

- 00195

- CR Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Therefore, we deny the petition

.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 9, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 1997, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         482,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  119,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,777,900
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,461,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,234,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,308,800
<BONDS>                                        250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,234,700
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,040,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,033,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (28,800)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               197,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                956,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            956,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   956,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    31.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: April 23, 2012. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10433
Fort Lee Federal Savings Bank, FSB
Fort Lee
NJ
4/20/2012


[FR Doc. 2012-10330 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
EX-10.1





 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDMENT TO THE 

ENERGEN CORPORATION 

STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 THIS
AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the Energen Corporation Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), is dated as of November 27, 2018. 

1.    Effective Time. This Amendment shall become effective as of the “Effective Time” (as defined in the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Diamondback Energy, Inc., Sidewinder Merger Sub Inc. and Energen Corporation, dated as of August 14, 2018). If the Effective Time does not occur, this Amendment shall be null and void ab initio.
Except as expressly set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. 

2.    Definitions. Terms that are capitalized but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.

 3.    Amendment to Definition of “Change in Control Termination”. With respect to Awards that
were outstanding as of August 14, 2018 and that remain outstanding as of immediately prior to the Effective Time, subsection (2) of the definition of “Change in Control Termination” in the Plan shall be amended and restated as
follows: 
 (2)    a voluntary termination for “good reason” (within the meaning of any change in control
severance plan for which the Participant is eligible or agreement applicable to the Participant on the date on which a Change in Control occurs) during the good reason termination protection period following a Change in Control as specified in the
applicable plan or agreement. 
 4.    Amendment to Sections 7.2 and 8.4. Notwithstanding any provision of
Sections 7.2 or 8.4 of the Plan to the contrary, Awards that were outstanding as of August 14, 2018 and that remain outstanding as of immediately prior to the Effective Time (a) shall be subject to full vesting (i.e., without
proration) upon a Qualified Termination due to Retirement occurring following the Effective Time and (b) to the extent vested, shall be settled on the earliest date permitted by Section 409A of the Code.
#### § 672.215 How are eligible entities notified of approval for grant funds?

The Secretary will, to the extent practicable, notify each eligible entity applying for funds no later than 5 months from the date the application is received, whether the application is approved or disapproved. In the event additional funds become available, ETA reserves the right to use such funds to select additional grantees from applications submitted in response to an SGA.