alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Southern Sauce Company, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wang
      Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.





Dated:
                September 26, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Wang ChenWang
                Chen
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (principal
                executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting
                officer )
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00072-CV

Cal-Tex Protective Coatings, Inc., Appellant

v.

Grounds Control of Texas, L.P., Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. C2002-0453C, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Cal-Tex Protective Coatings filed an unopposed motion to dismiss its

appeal advising that the parties have settled the only claim involved in the appeal. The appeal is

dismissed and costs are assessed against the party incurring them.

 

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: March 29, 2005
2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,044.34

 1,043.86

 1,043.40

 1,042.93

 1,042.50

 1,042.12

 1,041.71

 1,041.33

 1,040.85

 1,040.30

 1,039.73

 1,039.25

 1,038.85

 1,038.47

 1,038.13

 1,037.60

 1,037.06

 1,036.63

 1,036.21

 1,035.82

 1,035.38

 1,034.89

 1,034.33

 1,033.80

 1,033.35

 1,032.88

 1,032.45

 1,032.00

 1,031.52

 1,030.98

 1,030.43

 3,908.4

 3,895.5

 3,883.1

 3,870.5

 3,859.0

 3,848.9

 3,837.9

 3,827.8

 3,815.1

 3,800.5

 3,785.4

 3,772.7

 3,762.1

 3,752.1

 3,743.2

 3,729.3

 3,715.1

 3,703.9

 3,692.9

 3,682.7

 3,671.3

 3,658.6

 3,644.1

 3,630.5

 3,618.9

 3,606.8

 3,595.8

 3,584.3

 3,572.1

 3,558.3

 3,544.4

STORAGE

-11.9

-12.9

-12.4

-12.6

-11.5

-10.2

-10.9

-10.1

-12.7

-14.6

-15.1

-12.7

-10.6

-10.0

-9.0

-13.9

-14.2

-11.2

-11.0

-10.2

-11.4

-12.7

-14.5

-13.7

-11.6

-12.1

-11.0

-11.5

-12.2

-13.7

-13.9

CHANGE

 2,894

 2,143

 1,834

 2,144

 2,665

 2,817

 3,196

 3,895

 2,172

 1,899

 1,920

 2,627

 3,771

 3,328

 4,608

 1,615

 1,527

 3,201

 3,376

 3,797

 3,588

 3,071

 2,183

 2,222

 3,488

 3,443

 4,012

 3,708

 3,400

 2,196

 2,061

INFLOW

 8,578

 8,355

 7,731

 8,211

 8,097

 7,702

 8,396

 8,733

 8,365

 8,989

 9,366

 8,688

 8,832

 8,100

 8,817

 8,277

 8,298

 8,565

 8,559

 8,650

 9,106

 9,221

 9,207

 8,812

 8,931

 9,191

 9,222

 9,184

 9,232

 8,896

 8,789

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 302

 309

 332

 292

 362

 236

 306

 259

 235

 250

 163

 349

 271

 278

 309

 354

 369

 299

 344

 267

 244

 259

 273

 303

 393

 339

 338

 330

 330

 232

 298

C.F.S.

 .38

 .39

 .42

 .37

 .46

 .30

 .39

 .33

 .30

 .32

 .21

 .45

 .35

 .36

 .40

 .46

 .48

 .39

 .45

 .35

 .32

 .34

 .36

 .40

 .52

 .45

 .45

 .44

 .44

 .31

 .40

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2016 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 1, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -376.0 88,801 269,100 0 0 9,225 11.99 .00

ACRE-FEET -376,000 176,137 533,760 0 0 18,298

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 533,760

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 533,760

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2016 .00

 3,920.3

Table 3
#### Irene Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Dennis J. Murphy, Deceased, Respondent, v. Long Island Rail Road Company, Appellant.

Action to recover damages for the death of plaintiff's intestate in a grade crossing accident. Judgment in favor of plaintiff reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. A new trial is required because of the erroneous admission of. testimony that operators of *914automobiles were accustomed to cross the tracks at the intersection involved herein despite the fact that the warning signal lights were flashing. Carswell, Johnston and Sneed, JJ., concur; Lewis, P. J., and Adel, J., concur for reversal of the judgment hut as to granting a new trial they dissent and vote to dismiss the complaint with the following memorandum: The proof conclusively established that the decedent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. *(Wadsworth*v. *Delaware, L. & W. R. R. Co.,*296 N. Y. 206, and cases cited therein.)
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION**

     In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, I, Duane J. Roth,the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:

|        |                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                               |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and the results of operations ofthe Company. |

Date:  May 15, 2003

|            |                                                        |            |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|
| By:        | /s/ DUANE J. ROTH                                      |       |
|       |                                                        | ** ** |
| ** ** | **Duane J. Roth**                                      | ** ** |
| ** ** | **Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer** |       |

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

21
§ 408.1201 What are State recognition payments? ( a ) *State recognition payments; defined.* State recognition payments are any payments made by a State or one of its political subdivisions to an individual who is entitled to SVB, if the payments are made: ( 1 ) As a supplement to monthly SVB payments; and
( 2 ) Regularly, on a periodic recurring, or routine basis of at least once a quarter; and
( 3 ) In cash, which may be actual currency, or any negotiable instrument convertible into cash upon demand.
( b ) *State; defined.* For purposes of this subpart, State means a State of the United States or the District of Columbia.
§ 683.100 When do Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act grant funds become available for obligation? ( a ) WIOA *title I.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section or in the applicable fiscal year appropriation, fiscal year appropriations for programs and activities carried out under title I are available for obligation on the basis of a program year. A program year begins on July 1 in the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made and ends on June 30 of the following year.
( b ) *Youth funds.* Fiscal year appropriations for a program year's youth activities, authorized under chapter 2, subtitle B, title I of WIOA may be made available for obligation beginning on April 1 of the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made.
( c ) *Wagner-Peyser Act employment service.* Fiscal year appropriations for activities authorized under sec. 6 of the Wagner-Peyser Act, 29 U.S.C. 49e, are available for obligation on the basis of a program year. A program year begins July 1 in the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made and ends on June 30 of the following year.
( d ) *Discretionary grants.* Discretionary grant funds are available for obligation in accordance with the fiscal year appropriation.
#### § 641.824 What lobbying requirements apply to the use of SCSEP funds?

SCSEP recipients and sub-recipients must comply with the restrictions on lobbying codified in the Department's regulations at 29 CFR part 93. (Also refer to § 641.850(c), “Lobbying costs.”)
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David J. Schlanger, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WebMD Health Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. [Intentionally omitted]*

4. [Intentionally omitted]*

5. [Intentionally omitted]*

Date: April 29, 2015



/s/ David J. SchlangerDavid J. SchlangerChief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)




|* | Paragraphs 3 through 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by WebMD Health Corp. on February 27, 2015.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 126

 131

 121

 123

 141

 135

 124

 138

 130

 135

 132

 129

 136

 136

 138

 140

 143

 139

 139

 145

 144

 146

 179

 198

 196

 155

 158

 152

 155

 156

 185

 94

 96

 91

 99

 100

 104

 102

 105

 109

 107

 105

 98

 99

 110

 110

 112

 114

 126

 119

 117

 134

 133

 134

 144

 151

 139

 144

 135

 134

 130

 146

 111

 111

 109

 111

 113

 116

 113

 116

 119

 120

 119

 116

 119

 125

 125

 130

 130

 133

 131

 136

 140

 141

 145

 156

 161

 151

 150

 145

 148

 149

 157

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 11, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
E.L. Reid, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

Gov. Rick Perry et al., 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FILED 

JUN 2 2 2012 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

Civil Action No. 12 1028 

Respondents. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Petitioner, proceedingpra se, has submitted a "Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a 

Person in State Custody," along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court 

will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis and will dismiss the case for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

Petitioner is a Texas state prisoner incarcerated in Rosharon, Texas. He is challenging 

his conviction entered by a court in Galveston, Texas, following a jury trial. Pet. at 2. Federal 

court review of state convictions is available under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 only after the exhaustion of 

available state remedies. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(l). Thereafter, "an application for a writ of 

habeas corpus [] made by a person in custody under the judgment and sentence of a State court .. 

. may be filed in the district court for the district wherein such person is in custody or in the 

district court for the district within which the State court was held which convicted and sentenced 

[petitioner] and each of such district courts shall have concurrent jurisdiction to entertain the 

application." 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Because petitioner has no recourse in the District of 

Columbia, this action will be dismissed. A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum 

Opinion. r_;&- s 17~ United States District Judge 

Date: June')U , 2012
§ 668.510 What services may INA grantees provide to the community at large under section 166? ( a ) INA grantees may provide services to the Native American communities in their designated service areas by engaging in program development and service delivery activities which: ( 1 ) Strengthen the capacity of Native American-controlled institutions to provide education and work-based learning services to Native American youth and adults, whether directly or through other Native American institutions such as tribal colleges;
( 2 ) Increase the community's capacity to deliver supportive services, such as child care, transportation, housing, health, and similar services needed by clients to obtain and retain employment;
( 3 ) Use program participants engaged in education, training, work experience, or similar activities to further the economic and social development of Native American communities in accordance with the goals and values of those communities; and
( 4 ) Engage in other community-building activities described in the INA grantee's Two Year Plan.
( b ) INA grantees should develop their Two Year Plan in conjunction with, and in support of, strategic tribal planning and community development goals.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

           CERTIFICATION PROVIDED BY THE ADMINISTRATOR WITH FORM 10-K

Re:  Origen Manufactured Housing Contract Trust 2005-A (the "Trust" or
     the "Issuer"), Origen Manufactured Housing Contract Trust Collateralized
     Notes, Series 2005-A

I, W. Anderson Geater, Jr., the senior officer of Origen Servicing, Inc., the
Administrator for Origen Manufactured Housing Contract Trust 2005-A (the
"Registrant"), certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of Registrant;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution information required to be provided
by the Indenture Trustee under the Indenture, and the servicing information
required to be provided to the Indenture Trustee by the Servicer under the
Servicing Agreement for inclusion in these reports, is included in these
reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statements included in
the report and required to be delivered to the indenture trustee in accordance
with the terms of the Servicing Agreement, and except as disclosed in the
reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing
Agreement, and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the servicing, or similar, agreement, that is
included in these reports.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the Indenture Trustee and the Servicer.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
the Indenture, dated May 1, 2005 (the "Indenture"), among Origen Manufactured
Housing Contract Trust 2005-A as issuer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as
indenture trustee.

                                        Origen Servicing, Inc


                                        By: /s/ W. Anderson Geater, Jr.
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name: W. Anderson Geater, Jr.
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                        Date: March 16, 2006
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark T. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of Portal Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 24, 2010





/s/"Mark T. Brown"

Mark T. Brown,

Chief Financial Officer













#
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF INNOPHOS, INC.

SUBSIDIARIES OF INNOPHOS, INC.



| |  |  | INNOPHOS CANADA, INC.
| | - |  | ---------------------



| |  |  | INNOPHOS MEXICO HOLDINGS, LLC
| | - |  | -----------------------------

SUBSIDIARY OF
INNOPHOS MEXICO HOLDINGS, LLC



| |  |  | INNOPHOS MEXICANA S.A. DE C.V.
| | - |  | ------------------------------

SUBSIDIARIES OF
INNOPHOS MEXICANA S.A. DE C.V.



| |  |  | INNOPHOS TGI, S. R.L. DE C.V.
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | INNOPHOS SERVICIOS DE MEXICO, S. DE. R.L. DE C.V.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------

SUBSIDIARIES OF INNOPHOS TGI, S. R.L. DE C.V.



| |  |  | INNOPHOS DICAL, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | INNOPHOS FOSFATADOS DE MEXICO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------
§ 678.750 When and how can a one-stop partner appeal a one-stop infrastructure amount designated by the State under the State infrastructure funding mechanism? ( a ) The Governor must establish a process, described under sec. 121(h)(2)(E) of WIOA, for a one-stop partner administering a program described in §§ 678.400 through 678.410 to appeal the Governor's determination regarding the one-stop partner's portion of funds to be provided for one-stop infrastructure costs. This appeal process must be described in the Unified State Plan.
( b ) The appeal may be made on the ground that the Governor's determination is inconsistent with proportionate share requirements in § 678.735(a), the cost contribution limitations in § 678.735(b), the cost contribution caps in § 678.738, consistent with the process described in the State Plan.
( c ) The process must ensure prompt resolution of the appeal in order to ensure the funds are distributed in a timely manner, consistent with the requirements of § 683.630 of this chapter.
( d ) The one-stop partner must submit an appeal in accordance with State's deadlines for appeals specified in the guidance issued under § 678.705(b)(3), or if the State has not set a deadline, within 21 days from the Governor's determination.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

Les Oakes King & Spalding LLP 1180 Peachtree Street N.E. Atlanta, GA 30309-3521 Dear Mr. Oakes : 

# NlV -5 201't OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE

I am writing in response to your October 29, 2014 letter requesting an extension of the comment period for the 35 1h A venue site in Birmingham, AL. This site was proposed for listing on the National Priorities List (NPL) on September 22,2014 with a 60-day comment per iod that was scheduled to end on November 21, 2014. Your letter indicated that a 60-day extension of the comment period is needed in order to allow your client sufficient time to analyze the extensive set of data and historical documents on which EPA is relying for this proposed listing. EPA is giving you, and all other interested parties , an additional 60 days to submit comments related to the 35th Avenue site. All commenters have until January 20 , 20 15 to s ubmit comments. EPA w ill co nsider all comments received by January 20,2015. Please use Docket ID Number EPA-HQ - SFUND-2014-0623 for submittal of your comments via http: //www.regulations.gov. You may verify receipt ofcomments by checking back on ww w.regulations . gov (please a ll ow a day or two fo r web posting). 

# S g:_iyW?j£
James E . Woolford, Director Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation

Internet Address (URL) • http://www. epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100"k Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### §§ 655.424-655.429 [Reserved]