alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4046 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 220 East Oak Street, Glenwood City, Wisconsin, as the Second Lt. Ellen Ainsworth Memorial 

Post Office. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4046 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SECOND LT. ELLEN AINSWORTH MEMORIAL 

2 POST OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 220 East Oak Street, Glenwood 

5 City, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Second Lt. Ellen Ainsworth Memorial Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Second Lt. Ellen 

11 Ainsworth Memorial Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 1, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10266]



[[Page 25181]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Research Technical Assistance 
To The Ministry Of Public Health Of Haiti To Support Post Earthquake 
Reconstruction, Cholera And HIV/AIDS Response, GH12-003, initial 
review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 11:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m., May 22, 2012 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Research Technical Assistance To The Ministry Of 
Public Health Of Haiti To Support Post Earthquake Reconstruction, 
Cholera And HIV/AIDS Response, GH12-003''.
    Contact Person for More Information: Hylan D. Shoob, Ph.D., 
M.S.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., 
Mailstop D72, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 639-4796.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: April 23, 2012.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2012-10266 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
#### § 408.645 What must your representative payee do with unused benefits?

If your representative payee has accumulated benefits for you, he or she must conserve or invest them as provided in § 404.2045 of this chapter.
§ 422.104 Who can be assigned a social security number. ( a ) *Persons eligible for SSN assignment.* We can assign you a social security number if you meet the evidence requirements in § 422.107 and you are: ( 1 ) A United States citizen; or
( 2 ) An alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence or under other authority of law permitting you to work in the United States (§ 422.105 describes how we determine if a nonimmigrant alien is permitted to work in the United States); or
( 3 ) An alien who cannot provide evidence of alien status showing lawful admission to the U.S., or an alien with evidence of lawful admission but without authority to work in the U.S., if the evidence described in § 422.107(e) does not exist, but only for a valid nonwork reason. We consider you to have a valid nonwork reason if: ( i ) You need a social security number to satisfy a Federal statute or regulation that requires you to have a social security number in order to receive a Federally-funded benefit to which you have otherwise established entitlement and you reside either in or outside the U.S.; or
( ii ) You need a social security number to satisfy a State or local law that requires you to have a social security number in order to receive public assistance benefits to which you have otherwise established entitlement, and you are legally in the United States.
( b ) *Annotation for a nonwork purpose.* If we assign you a social security number as an alien for a nonwork purpose, we will indicate in our records that you are not authorized to work. We will also mark your social security card with a legend such as “NOT VALID FOR EMPLOYMENT.” If earnings are reported to us on your number, we will inform the Department of Homeland Security of the reported earnings.
[68 FR 55308, Sept. 25, 2003]
This report is not available for the months of July, August, and September.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

DAY

 10,378

 9,308

 9,054

 7,484

 9,028

 7,998

 7,590

 8,156

 7,483

 6,634

 6,283

 6,375

 6,030

 6,112

 5,460

 303,014

 297,723

 291,679

 285,697

 278,521

 273,172

 267,112

 260,966

 255,666

 249,992

 243,795

 237,574

 231,751

 225,892

 220,404

 216,608

 222,969

 229,267

 236,819

 242,451

 248,830

 255,298

 260,878

 266,851

 273,374

 279,922

 286,051

 292,219

 297,996

 304,136

 670,877

 690,580

 710,085

 733,477

 750,918

 770,676

 790,710

 807,990

 826,490

 846,694

 866,976

 885,958

 905,060

 922,953

 941,970

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2005 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: October 26, 2005

 313,392

 307,031

 300,733

 293,181

 287,549

 281,170

 274,702

 269,122

 263,149

 256,626

 250,078

 243,949

 237,781

 232,004

 225,864

 629,123

 609,420

 589,915

 566,523

 549,082

 529,324

 509,290

 492,010

 473,510

 453,306

 433,024

 414,042

 394,940

 377,047

 358,030

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 1,090,839

 1,105,782

 1,120,725

 1,135,668

 1,150,611

 1,165,554

 1,180,497

 1,195,440

 1,210,383

 1,225,326

 1,240,269

 1,255,212

 1,270,155

 1,285,098

 1,300,041

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 318,962
### §290g–4. Authorization of appropriations; repayments and distributions from Fund to Treasury

(a) There is hereby authorized to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation, as the United States subscription, $25,000,000 to be paid by the Secretary of the Treasury to the Fund in three annual installments of $9,000,000, $8,000,000, and $8,000,000.

(b) Any repayment or distribution of moneys from the Fund to the United States shall be covered into the Treasury as a miscellaneous receipt.

(Pub. L. 94–302, title II, §206, May 31, 1976, 90 Stat. 594.)
- 796 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

296 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. SCHIESSER

Cite as 296 Neb. 796

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Michael R. Schiesser, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed June 2, 2017. No. S-16-115.

Petition for further review from the Court of Appeals, 

Inbody, Riedmann, and Bishop, Judges, on appeal thereto from 

the District Court for Lancaster County, Lori A. Maret, Judge. 

Judgment of Court of Appeals affirmed.

John S. Berry, of Berry Law Firm, for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, Melissa R. Vincent, 

and, on brief, George R. Love for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, 

Kelch, and Funke, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the briefs and record and having heard 

oral arguments, we conclude on further review that the decision of the Nebraska Court of Appeals in State v. Schiesser, 24 

Neb. App. 407, 888 N.W.2d 736 (2016), is correct, and accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals which 

affirmed the judgment of the district court.

Affirmed.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

08/11/2017 09:07 AM CDT
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1172

DARRYL ALLMOND,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; EDWARD J.

PROKOP, Chief Deputy; JOHN KAPETANIS,

Sergeant; GEORGE GRAY, Deputy; DARREN HINZMAN,

Deputy,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-02-309-A)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darryl Allmond, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Kearney Saba, SHUFORD,

RUBIN & GIBNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Darryl Allmond appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for reconsideration in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Allmond v. Alexandria Sheriff’s Dep’t, No. CA-02-309-A

(E.D. Va. filed Jan. 22, 2003 & entered Jan. 23, 2003; Jan. 29,

2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §6413. Establishment of religious freedom Internet site

In order to facilitate access by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and by the public around the world to international documents on the protection of religious freedom, the Secretary of State, with the assistance of the Ambassador at Large, shall establish and maintain an Internet site containing major international documents relating to religious freedom, the Annual Report, the Executive Summary, and any other documentation or references to other sites as deemed appropriate or relevant by the Ambassador at Large.

(Pub. L. 105–292, title I, §103, Oct. 27, 1998, 112 Stat. 2795.)
FAX
(303) 623-4258
 R
                    RYDER
      SCOTT COMPANYS
                    PETROLEUM
      CONSULTANTS
 
 621
      SEVENTEENTH STREET
                SUITE
      15S0
                DENVER,
      COLORADO 80293
                TElEPHONE
      (303) 623-9147
 
  Exhibit
No. 23.1
 
  CONSENT
OF SNDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
  As
independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the
reference of our name in the Report on Form 10 for the years ending December 31,
2007 and December 31, 2006 of PDC 2005A (the "Partnership"). We have no interest
of a substantial or material nature in the Partnership, or in any affiliate. We
have not been employed on a contingent basis, and we are not connected with the
Partnership, or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee,
director, officer, employee or affiliate.
   /s/
      Ryder Scott Company, L.P.RYDER
      SCOTT COMPANY, L P
 
  Denver,
Colorado
 November
14, 2008
   1100
      LOUISIANA. SUITE 3800
                  HOUSTON,
      TEXAS 77002-5218
                  TEL
      (713) 651-9191
                  FAX(713)
      651-08491100,
      530-8TH STREET, S.W
                  CALGARY,
      ALBERTA T2P 2W2
                  TEL
      (403) 262-2799
                  FAX
      (403) 262-2790
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       17
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7804

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY MAURICE YOUNG-BEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-95-148, CA-97-2027-A)

Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Maurice Young-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. Justin Michael Dempsey, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although two of the district court’s orders are marked as

“filed” on November 24 and November 30, 1998, the district court’s

records show that they were entered on the docket sheet on November

25 and December 1, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the orders

were entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date

of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d

1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Maurice Young-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998), and his motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Young-Bey, Nos. CR-95-148; CA-97-2027-

A (E.D. Va. Nov. 12, Nov. 25 & Dec. 1, 1998).* We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §2323. Transfer of defense articles or services

#### (a) Notice to Congress

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds available to the Department of Defense for the current fiscal year and hereafter may be obligated or expended to transfer to another nation or an international organization any defense articles or services (other than intelligence services) for use in the activities described in subsection (b) unless the congressional defense committees, the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate are notified 15 days in advance of such transfer.

#### (b) Activities affected

This section applies to—

(1) any international peacekeeping or peace-enforcement operation under the authority of chapter VI or chapter VII of the United Nations Charter under the authority of a United Nations Security Council resolution; and

(2) any other international peacekeeping, peace-enforcement, or humanitarian assistance operation.

#### (c) Contents of notice

A notice under subsection (a) shall include the following:

(1) A description of the equipment, supplies, or services to be transferred.

(2) A statement of the value of the equipment, supplies, or services to be transferred.

(3) In the case of a proposed transfer of equipment or supplies—

(A) a statement of whether the inventory requirements of all elements of the Armed Forces (including the reserve components) for the type of equipment or supplies to be transferred have been met; and

(B) a statement of whether the items proposed to be transferred will have to be replaced and, if so, how the President proposes to provide funds for such replacement.

(Pub. L. 113–235, div. C, title VIII, §8050, Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2264.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2015, and also as part of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, and not as part of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 which comprises this chapter.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### "Congressional Defense Committees" Defined

For definition of "congressional defense committees" as the Armed Services Committees and the Subcommittees on Defense of the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives, see section 8026 of div. C of Pub. L. 113–235, formerly set out as a note under section 2731 of Title 10, Armed Forces.
#### § 663.610 Does the statutory priority for use of adult funds also apply to dislocated worker funds?

No, the statutory priority applies to adult funds for intensive and training services only. Funds allocated for dislocated workers are not subject to this requirement.
(No. 00012

#### Virginia Polimeni, as wife of John Polimeni, deceased, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 13, 1972.*

Virginia Polimeni, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.

This claim was filed pursuant to *Ch. 48, Sec. 281 et seq., Ill.Rev.Stat., 1971,*“Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act.” The Court is in receipt of the Application for Benefits and Statement of Supervising Officer, as well as an investigative report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office. Based upon these documents the Court finds as follows:

That the claimant, Virginia Polimeni, is the wife of the decedent and is the named beneficiary under the Application for Benefits. That the decedent, John Polimeni, was a volunteer fireman for the Vernon Fire *396Protection District, engaged in the scope of duty on June 21, 1971, within the meaning of Section 282 of the aforecited act. On said date he suffered extreme traumatic injuries resulting in his death when the fire department pumper truck he was driving failed to complete a s-shaped curve, overturned and went into a ditch. The Court further finds that the Attorney General’s office in its investigation has determined that this claim is within the scope of the above cited statutes:

> “Section 282 (e) ‘killed in the line of duty’ means losing one’s life as a result of injury received in the active performance of duties as a law enforcement officer or fireman if the death occurs within one year from the date the injury was received and if that injury arose from violence or other accidental cause. . . .”

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sum of $10,000.00 (TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS) be, and the same hereby is, granted to Virginia Polimeni, as wife and next of kin of the decedent, John Polimeni.
§ 641.870 Under what circumstances may the administrative cost limitation be increased? ( a ) SCSEP recipients may request that the Department increase the amount available for administrative costs. The Department may honor the request if: ( 1 ) The Department determines that it is necessary to carry out the project; and
( 2 ) The recipient demonstrates that: ( i ) Major administrative cost increases are being incurred in necessary program components, such as liability insurance, payments for workers' compensation for staff, costs associated with achieving unsubsidized placement goals, and other operation requirements imposed by the Department;
( ii ) The number of community service assignment positions in the project or the number of minority eligible individuals participating in the project will decline if the amount available for paying the cost of administration is not increased; or
( iii ) The size of the project is so small that the amount of administrative costs incurred to carry out the project necessarily exceeds 13.5 percent of the grant amount. (OAA § 502(c)(3)).
( b ) A request by a recipient or prospective recipient for an increase in the amount available for administrative costs may be submitted as part of the grant application or as a separate submission at any time after the grant award.
Author: ICF Consulting, Inc; Abt Associates, Inc.

Source: Integrated Planning Model (IPM)

Date Created: 6/18/2008

Date Modified: 3/31/2011

Purpose: Contains NERC region level electricity, coal, and gas prices for Option 1: IM Everywhere policy IPM run.

File Contents:

Worksheet Contents

ToAbt NERC region level electricity, coal, and gas prices for Option 1: IM Everywhere policy IPM run.

Input Files:

External data used in calculations/analysis:

None.

FileInfo 1 of 2
NERC Level Prices - EPA302ABT_PC_3c

Capacity Price ($/kW-yr) Energy Price (mills/kWh)

NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028

FRCC 10.80 17.65 39.36 57.92 61.63 60.36 52.12 53.17

MRO 0.00 54.10 62.28 77.39 35.46 38.43 38.64 40.23

NPCC 0.00 32.85 45.93 70.68 61.05 62.45 58.86 62.11

RFC 3.72 61.81 59.52 75.33 36.47 39.95 39.99 41.50

SERC 14.38 32.47 58.10 71.37 41.31 44.05 42.20 43.42

SPP 10.34 13.75 35.50 44.25 42.26 42.72 39.71 41.80

TRE 14.43 18.84 44.57 54.66 53.27 53.35 48.08 49.86

WECC 4.39 19.98 47.16 62.07 48.98 49.88 44.36 45.65

Natural Gas Price ($/MMBtu) Coal Price ($/MMBtu)

NERC Region 2015 2020 2025 2028 2015 2020 2025 2028

FRCC 6.33 6.55 6.09 6.39 2.26 2.24 2.02 2.10

MRO 5.87 5.87 5.58 5.91 1.27 1.24 1.26 1.27

NPCC 6.74 6.99 6.54 6.87 2.04 2.03 2.04 2.10

RFC 6.48 6.62 6.16 6.50 1.53 1.53 1.55 1.61

SERC 6.02 6.07 5.83 6.15 1.74 1.72 1.70 1.73

SPP 5.71 5.68 5.41 5.72 1.18 1.14 1.17 1.19

TRE 5.72 5.82 5.50 5.84 1.61 1.55 1.57 1.63

WECC 5.93 6.21 5.73 6.05 1.29 1.29 1.35 1.37

ToAbt 2 of 2