Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d and is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 30838 C onfer enc e C al endar DON NA OSB ORNE M CKENZI E Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant
v. E O G R E S O U R C E S IN C; M AR KB PA PA , i n hi s c ap ac i t y as CE O a nd Ch a i r ma n o f

t h e B o a r do f

E O G; J OHNNYOS BO RNE ; A L VE RNE OS BO RNE BA RNE S ; L I NDAOS BO RNE W OOD S D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 3: 08- C V

- 308 B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * D o n n aO s b o r n e M c K e n z ie , p r o c e e d in gp r o s e , a p p e a ls t h e d is t r ic tc o u r t ’s d i s m i s s a lo f

h e rc o m p l a i n ta g a i n s tEOG Re s o u r c e s , I n c . a n dM a r kB. P a p a , CEO and C hai r m an of

t he B oar d, f

orpr oduc t i on paym ent s orr oyalt i es on o i land gas w el l s i n L ou i si an a. Thedi s t r i c tc o urtdi sm i ssed M cK en zi e’ s c l ai m s agai n stM ark B . P a p a fo rla c ko f p e r s o n a l ju r is d ic tio n . T h e d is tr ic t c o u r t s u b s e q u e n tly United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 30838

2 di sm i ssed her com pl ai n tf or fai l u re to com pl y w i t h t h e court ’ s or der t o j oi n her sibl i n gs as r equ i red pa rt i es pu rsuan tt o F ED . R. C IV . P . 19 du e t o l i t i gati on p e n d in gin L o u is ia n as ta te co u r t c o n c e r n i n go w n e r s h ip o f th e p r o p e r tyin que s t i o n. M c K e nz i e a r gue s t hatt he di s t r i c tc o ur te r r e d a s am at t e ro f l aw i n fail i ng t o f o l l o w pr o c e dur aldu e p ro c e s s . Al t ho ught hi s c o ur tl ibe r all y c o ns t r ue s t he b r ie fs o f p r o s e litig a n ts , p r o s e p a r tie s m u s t s till b r ie f th e is s u e s a n dco m p ly w i t h t he s t and ar ds o f Rul e 2 8 o f

t he Fe de r alRul e s o f Appe l l at e Pr o c e dur e. G r ant v . C ue l lar , 59 F . 3d 523 , 524 ( 5th C i r. 199 5) . Th e F ederalR u l es of A ppel l at e Pr oc edur e r equi r e t he par t i es t o pr ovi de r ef er en ces t o the page n u m b e ro f th e r e c o r dt o s u p p o r t s ta te m e n ts o f fa c t. F ED . R. A PP . P. 2 8( a) ( 7) a nd (9 )(A); 5 T H C IR . R . 2 8 .2 .2 . R u le 2 8 (a )(9 )(A) a ls o re q u ir e s th e a r g u m e n t t o co n ta in ci t ati on s t o t h e au t h ori t i es on w h i ch the ap pel l an treli es. M cK en zi e’ s bri ef c ont ai ns no r ec or d c i t at i ons a n d n o c i t at i on t o r el evantl egalaut hor i t y. M c K e nz i e ha s no tb r i e fe d a ny ar gum e ntr e l at i ng t o t he di s t r i c tc o ur t ’ s r e as o ns fo rd is m is s a l. F a il u r e b yth e a p p e ll a n tto id e n t if ya n ye r r o rin th e d is t r ic tc o u r t ’s anal ys i s or appl i c at i on t o t he fac t s of t he c as e i s t he s am e a s i f t he appell anthad n o t a p p e a le d th a t ju d g m e n t. B ri n km an n v. D allas Cou n ty D epu ty S h erif f A bn er , 8 1 3 F .2d 7 4 4 , 7 4 8 (5t h C ir. 1 9 8 7 ). M c K e nz i e ’ s a ppe ali s i n ad e qua t e l y br i e fe d, a nd we t hus D I SM I SS t he a p p e a la s f

r iv o l o u s . 5 t h C i r . R . 4 2 . 2 . T h e mo t i o n f o rd i s c o v e r yi s DE NI ED .