alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §5510. United States Government compensation for victims of terrorism

#### (a) Compensation

The President shall submit to the Congress, not later than one year after November 16, 1990, recommendations on whether or not legislation should be enacted to authorize the United States to provide monetary and tax relief as compensation to United States citizens who are victims of terrorism.

#### (b) Board

The President may establish a board to develop criteria for compensation and to recommend changes to existing laws to establish a single comprehensive approach to victim compensation for terrorist acts.

#### (c) Income tax benefit for victims of Lockerbie terrorism

#### (1) In general

Subject to paragraph (2), in the case of any individual whose death was a direct result of the Pan American Airways Flight 103 terrorist disaster over Lockerbie, Scotland, on December 21, 1988, any tax imposed by subtitle A of title 26 shall not apply—

(A) with respect to the taxable year which includes December 21, 1988, and

(B) with respect to the prior taxable year.

#### (2) Limitation

In no case may the tax benefit pursuant to paragraph (1) for any taxable year, for any individual, exceed an amount equal to 28 percent of the annual rate of basic pay at Level V of the Executive Schedule of the United States as of December 21, 1988.

(Pub. L. 101–604, title II, §211, Nov. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 3085.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Level V of the Executive Schedule, referred to in subsec. (c)(2), is set out in section 5316 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
### §277d–28. Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State for use of the United States Section, International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, not in excess of $300,000 for the initial cost of the work authorized in sections 277d–26 to 277d–28 of this title, and not to exceed $30,000 based on December 1975 prices, plus or minus such amounts as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in operation and maintenance costs involved therein, annually thereafter for necessary maintenance.

(Pub. L. 88–411, §3, Aug. 10, 1964, 78 Stat. 386; Pub. L. 93–126, §7(b), Oct. 18, 1973, 87 Stat. 452; Pub. L. 95–105, title V, §514(b), Aug. 17, 1977, 91 Stat. 862.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1977—Pub. L. 95–105 inserted "based on December 1975 prices, plus or minus such amounts as may be justified by reason of ordinary fluctuations in operation and maintenance costs involved therein," after "$30,000".

1973—Pub. L. 93–126 substituted "$30,000" for "$20,000".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1977 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–105 effective Oct. 1, 1977, see section 514(d) of Pub. L. 95–105, set out as a note under section 277d–3 of this title.
# MD- E MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT .1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230 410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101 • www.mde.maryland.gdv Larry Hogan Governor BoydRutherford Lieutenant Governor Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator I {)CJ 

## l 926f5

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street (3RAOO) Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 

## "Sh4l-"'f\**DearMr.~:** RECEIVED 

## OCT 26 

## 2015 Ben Grumbles Secretary

EPA,REGION Ill oFPtCBOPREOIONALAl>MINISTRATOR

On July 22, 2013, Maryland submitted the Baltimore Serious NonattainmentArea (BNAA) 0.08 ppm 8-Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan ("2013 Ozone SIP"). The 2013 Ozone SIP for the Baltimore Nonattainment Area includes the following parts thatEPA expects to act on this year, (i) the updates to the 2002 base year emissions inventory, (ii) the updates to reasonable further progress (RFP) plan up to 2008, (iii) the RFP for 2011 and for 2012, (iv) the RFP contingency measures, and (v) the 2012 Transportation Conformity Budgets. Since the BNAA did not achieve the ozone standard by its attainment date EPA would not approve the portions ofthe SIP relating to the attainment demonstration. The purpose ofthis letter is to withdraw the remaining portions ofthe July 22, 2013 submittal related to the attainment demonstration. Specifically, the State ofMaryland hereby withdraws (i) the Attainment Demonstration (including modeling and weight ofevidence), (ii) contingency measures for attainment, and (iii) the reasonably available control measure (RACM) analysis, all ofwhich were submitted onJuly 22, 2013. Ifyou have any questions regarding this letter, please contactTad Aburn, Air Director at410-537- 3255. Sincerely,

Ben Grumbles Secretary

## ~ Recycled Paper www.mde.maryland.gov

### ~ECEIVED 

## OCT 2**~** 

## 2015 IDivisi0nnirector (3AP00)

TIY Users l-800-735-2258 Via Maryland Relay Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE INTERIM
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DENTAL/MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC
SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTH PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1997 INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       6,082,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,869,654
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,975
<INVENTORY>                                  2,489,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,865,552
<PP&E>                                         579,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                 151,869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,437,456
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,925,246
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,106
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,307,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,437,456
<SALES>                                     11,688,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,688,838
<CGS>                                        7,384,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,541,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             136,774
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (311,215)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,042)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (300,173)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (234,149)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (534,322)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
#### Francis J. J. De Raismes v. United States Lithograph Company and Others. (2 cases.)

Motions granted; questions certified. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4510 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 617
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4510

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2016

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To insure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts Ditch headgate 
  and ditch segment within the Holy Cross Wilderness in Eagle County, 
                   Colorado, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bolts Ditch Access and Use Act''.

SEC. 2. BOLTS DITCH ACCESS.

    (a) Access Granted.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall permit by 
special use authorization nonmotorized access and use, in accordance 
with section 293.6 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, of the 
Bolts Ditch headgate and the Bolts Ditch within the Holy Cross 
Wilderness, Colorado, as designated by Public Law 96-560, for the 
purposes of the diversion of water and use, maintenance, and repair of 
such ditch and headgate by the Town of Minturn, Colorado, a Colorado 
Home Rule Municipality.
    (b) Location of Facilities.--The Bolts Ditch headgate and ditch 
segment referenced in subsection (a) are as generally depicted on the 
map entitled ``Bolts Ditch headgate and Ditch Segment'', dated November 
2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 6, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 617

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4510

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To insure adequate use and access to the existing Bolts Ditch headgate 
  and ditch segment within the Holy Cross Wilderness in Eagle County, 
                   Colorado, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 7, 2016

            Received; read twice and placed on the calendar
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 976.30

 976.03

 975.75

 975.45

 974.98

 974.64

 974.33

 973.93

 973.81

 973.51

 973.20

 972.91

 972.62

 972.27

 971.90

 971.65

 971.45

 971.28

 971.05

 970.80

 970.65

 970.52

 970.30

 970.02

 969.86

 969.58

 969.28

 969.06

 968.82

 968.60

 2,344.5

 2,339.3

 2,334.0

 2,328.3

 2,319.3

 2,312.9

 2,307.0

 2,299.4

 2,297.2

 2,291.5

 2,285.7

 2,280.3

 2,274.8

 2,268.3

 2,261.4

 2,256.7

 2,253.0

 2,249.8

 2,245.5

 2,240.9

 2,238.1

 2,235.7

 2,231.6

 2,226.5

 2,223.5

 2,218.4

 2,212.8

 2,208.8

 2,204.4

 2,200.4

STORAGE

-6.7

-5.2

-5.3

-5.7

-9.0

-6.4

-5.9

-7.6

-2.3

-5.6

-5.8

-5.5

-5.4

-6.6

-6.9

-4.7

-3.7

-3.2

-4.3

-4.6

-2.8

-2.4

-4.1

-5.2

-2.9

-5.2

-5.5

-4.0

-4.4

-4.0

CHANGE

 2,353

 3,495

 3,020

 3,307

 2,185

 2,646

 2,985

 2,074

 4,350

 2,366

 2,178

 2,251

 2,693

 2,423

 2,333

 2,852

 2,957

 3,063

 2,840

 2,023

 3,007

 2,973

 3,083

 2,718

 2,934

 2,314

 2,239

 2,836

 2,182

 2,317

INFLOW

 5,501

 5,894

 5,576

 5,975

 6,530

 5,797

 5,788

 5,639

 5,239

 5,130

 5,010

 4,894

 5,320

 5,606

 5,699

 5,067

 4,714

 4,532

 4,856

 4,293

 4,265

 4,104

 5,054

 5,217

 4,321

 4,803

 4,892

 4,704

 4,259

 4,217

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 231

 208

 135

 213

 167

 95

 156

 250

 250

 83

 111

 105

 110

 121

 121

 131

 120

 126

 142

 65

 142

 82

 82

 114

 98

 108

 130

 173

 140

 129

C.F.S.

 .41

 .37

 .24

 .38

 .30

 .17

 .28

 .45

 .45

 .15

 .20

 .19

 .20

 .22

 .22

 .24

 .22

 .23

 .26

 .12

 .26

 .15

 .15

 .21

 .18

 .20

 .24

 .32

 .26

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2020 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 4, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -150.9 80,997 152,896 0 0 4,138 7.51 .00

ACRE-FEET -150,900 160,658 303,269 0 0 8,208

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 303,269

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 303,269

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2020 .03

 2,351.2

Table 3

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 34.44
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 129.67

 129.80

 129.89

 129.93

 129.97

 129.98

 129.92

 129.72

 129.74

 129.77

 129.95

 130.22

 130.44

 129.73

 129.67

 129.98

 129.61

 130.09

 130.09

 130.13

 130.01

 129.95

 130.18

 130.08

 130.40

 130.25

 130.71

 130.43

 130.62

 130.22

 548

 560

 569

 573

 578

 579

 572

 553

 555

 557

 576

 603

 627

 554

 548

 579

 542

 590

 590

 594

 582

 576

 599

 589

 623

 607

 657

 626

 646

 603

STORAGE

-3

+12

+9

+4

+5

+1

-7

-19

+2

+2

+19

+27

+24

-73

-6

+31

-37

+48

+0

+4

-12

-6

+23

-10

+34

-16

+50

-31

+20

-43

CHANGE

1,994

1,918

1,802

1,700

1,612

1,562

1,611

1,482

1,436

1,446

1,361

1,152

1,112

1,052

1,011

968

921

880

816

747

694

653

600

550

524

467

442

414

431

402

INFLOW

 1,916

 1,828

 1,716

 1,609

 1,509

 1,455

 1,497

 1,371

 1,324

 1,354

 1,261

 1,036

 983

 968

 895

 828

 821

 720

 667

 596

 552

 497

 407

 358

 304

 246

 151

 148

 133

 136

PUTAH

 79

 84

 81

 89

 99

 106

 118

 120

 111

 90

 89

 101

 116

 120

 118

 124

 119

 135

 148

 148

 147

 158

 180

 196

 202

 228

 265

 281

 287

 287

PUTAH

 1

 0

 0

 0

 1

 0

 0

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .20

 .08

 .09

 .05

 .15

 .10

 .10

 .19

 .10

 .30

 .35

 .29

 .26

 .22

 .32

 .08

 .14

 .26

 .23

 .28

 .27

 .29

 .43

 .38

 .38

 .31

 .28

 .29

 .22

 .35

INCHES

 .00

 .09

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

APRIL 2019 RUN DATE: 05/01/2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +52 31,760 4,426 27,286 22 6.99 .15

ACRE-FEET +52 62,996 8,779 54,122 44

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 54,122

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 8,779

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .15

JULY 1, 2018 37.99

 551

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 37.98
### §280j. Representation in Congress; appointment of delegates and alternates

The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the Government of the United States in, and to appoint the United States delegates and their alternates to, the Pan American Railway Congress, the constitution and bylaws of which were approved in Montevideo, Uruguay, April 1946, and deposited in the archives of the Pan American Union in Washington.

(June 28, 1948, ch. 686, §1, 62 Stat. 1060.)
#### Richard S. Lilienthal, Inc., Respondent, v. Union Underwear Co., Inc., Appellant.

Present •—• Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 730.00

 730.01

 730.01

 730.01

 730.02

 730.03

 730.04

 730.05

 730.06

 730.06

 730.06

 730.06

 730.07

 730.11

 730.16

 722.62

 720.29

 720.34

 720.36

 720.39

 720.38

 720.36

 720.39

 720.42

 720.44

 720.46

 720.47

 720.48

 720.50

 720.56

 1,576

 1,576

 1,576

 1,576

 1,577

 1,577

 1,578

 1,578

 1,579

 1,579

 1,579

 1,579

 1,579

 1,581

 1,583

 1,282

 1,196

 1,198

 1,199

 1,200

 1,200

 1,199

 1,200

 1,201

 1,202

 1,203

 1,203

 1,203

 1,204

 1,206

STORAGE

+2

+0

+0

+0

+1

+0

+1

+0

+1

+0

+0

+0

+0

+2

+2

-301

-86

+2

+1

+1

+0

-1

+1

+1

+1

+1

+0

+0

+1

+2

CHANGE

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

0

1

0

0

0

2

1

1

-17

-9

1

1

1

0

-1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

1

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 0

 0

 135

 34

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2016 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2016

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -368 -10 0 171

ACRE-FEET -368 -20 0 339

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 339

 339

 1,574

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
#### City of Bloomington v. Ann Goodrich.

Pleading and *evidence—what will amount to a variance.*In an action on the case, against a municipal corporation, it was alleged in the declaration that the plaintiff had received injuries in consequence of a portion of the sidetvalk being out of repair, “to-wit, by some of the planks being broken, so that large and deep holes were in said walk, and the surface of the same became, and was, very rough, irregular and uneven,” etc. The proof failed to show that any of the planks in the sidewalk were broken, but, on the contrary, it showed that the only defect in the sidewalk was that two of the planks were removed therefrom: *Held,*there was a fatal variance between the allegation and proofs.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county.

This was an action on the case, by Ann Goodrich, against the city of Bloomington, for an injury alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff on account of the defective condition of a sidewalk. Upon trial, the jury returned a verdict for $4500. Judgment was rendered accordingly. The defendant appealed.

Mr. B. D. Lucas, for the appellant.

Messrs. Weldon & McNulta, and Messrs. Hamilton & Spencer, for the appellee.

Per Curiam :

The doctrine is laid down by Chitty (1 Pleadings, 7 Am. ed. 427,) that *“*if the pleader, though needlessly, describe the tort, and the means adopted in effecting it, with minuteness and particularity, and the proof substantially vary from the statement, there will be a fatal- variance^ which will occasion a non-suit.”

*559It is alleged in the declaration in this case that appellee received the injury complained of in consequence of a portion of the sidewalk being out of repair, “ to-wit, by some of the planks being broken, so that large and deep holes were in said walk, and the surface of the same became, and was, very rough, irregular and uneven,” etc. The proof entirely fails to show that any of the planks in the sidewalk were broken, but, on the contrary, it shows that the only defect in the sidewalk was, that two of the planks were removed therefrom.

This was a fatal variance between the allegation and proofs. Hilliard’s Remedies for Torts, p. 159, §§ 9, 10, *et seq.; Moss et al.*v. *Johnson,*22 Ill. 633; *Illinois Central Railroad Co.*v. *McKee,*43 id. 120.

We are not satisfied, from the evidence in this record, with the amount of the damages assessed. They seem to be excessive. There is evidence showing that appellee was, prior to receiving the injury complained of, affected by a disease, which is not satisfactorily shown to have been permanently cured prior to that time, and from which, we are inclined to believe, she has since suffered,- in all probability, quite as much as from the injury by reason of the fall on the sidewalk. For such suffering, appellant can not, of course, be held responsible.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

*Judgment reversed.*
§ 654.409 Heating. ( a ) All living quarters and service rooms must be provided with properly installed, operable heating equipment capable of maintaining a temperature of at least 68 degrees Fahrenheit ( °F) if during the period of normal occupancy the temperature in such quarters falls below 68 °F.
( b ) Any stoves or other sources of heat utilizing combustible fuel must be installed and vented in such a manner as to prevent fire hazards and a dangerous concentration of gases. No portable heaters other than those operated by electricity may be provided. If a solid or liquid fuel stove is used in a room with wooden or other combustible flooring, there must be a concrete slab, insulated metal sheet, or other fireproof material on the floor under each stove, extending at least 18 inches beyond the perimeter of the base of the stove.
( c ) Any wall or ceiling within 18 inches of a solid or liquid fuel stove or a stovepipe must be of fireproof material. A vented metal collar must be installed around a stovepipe, or vent passing through a wall, ceiling, floor, or roof.
( d ) When a heating system has automatic controls, the controls must be of the type which cut off the fuel supply upon the failure or interruption of the flame or ignition, or whenever a predetermined safe temperature or pressure is exceeded.
§ 418.1005 Purpose and administration. ( a ) The purpose of the income-related monthly adjustment amount is to reduce the Federal subsidy of the Medicare Part B program for beneficiaries with modified adjusted gross income above an established threshold. These beneficiaries will pay a greater share of actual program costs. Medicare Part B premiums paid by beneficiaries cover approximately 25 percent of total Medicare Part B program costs and the remaining 75 percent of program costs are subsidized by the Federal Government's contributions to the Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund. The reduction in the Medicare Part B premium subsidy results in an increase in the total amount that affected beneficiaries pay for Medicare Part B coverage. A beneficiary with modified adjusted gross income above the threshold amount will pay: ( 1 ) The Medicare Part B standard monthly premium; plus
( 2 ) Any applicable increase in the standard monthly premium for late enrollment or reenrollment; plus
( 3 ) An income-related monthly adjustment amount.
( b ) The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) publishes the Medicare Part B standard monthly premium each year. CMS also establishes rules for entitlement to a nonstandard premium, as well as premium penalties for late enrollment or reenrollment (42 CFR 408.20 through 408.27).
( c ) We use information that we get from IRS to determine if beneficiaries who are enrolled in Medicare Part B are required to pay an income-related monthly adjustment amount. We also change income-related monthly adjustment amount determinations using information provided by a beneficiary under certain circumstances. In addition, we notify beneficiaries when the social security benefit amounts they receive will change based on our income-related monthly adjustment amount determination.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. STEPHANIE ANN BUDIHAS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 838 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 2nd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### Franc N. Way, Respondent, v. Broadway Sightseeing, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.