alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental Performance of a Micromachined Heat Flux SensorSteady-state and frequency response calibration of a microfabricated heat-flux sensor have been completed. This sensor is batch fabricated using standard, micromachining techniques, allowing both miniaturization and the ability to create arrays of sensors and their corresponding interconnects. Both high-frequency and spatial response is desired, so the sensors are both thin and of small cross-sectional area. Thin-film, temperature-sensitive resistors are used as the active gauge elements. Two sensor configurations are investigated: (1) a Wheatstone-bridge using four resistors; and (2) a simple, two-resistor design. In each design, one resistor (or pair) is covered by a thin layer (5000 A) thermal barrier; the other resistor (or pair) is covered by a thick (5 microns) thermal barrier. The active area of a single resistor is 360 microns by 360 microns; the total gauge area is 1.5 mm square. The resistors are made of 2000 A-thick metal; and the entire gauge is fabricated on a 25 microns-thick flexible, polyimide substrate. Heat flux through the surface changes the temperature of the resistors and produces a corresponding change in resistance. Sensors were calibrated using two radiation heat sources: (1) a furnace for steady-state, and (2) a light and chopper for frequency response.Document ID19980206267Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsStefanescu, S.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*DeAnna, R. G.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Mehregany, M.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1998Subject CategoryThermodynamics And Statistical PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107517ARL-MR-363NAS 1.15:107517AD-A345439Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: sEATTLE, waCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 6, 1997End Date: July 9, 1997Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsTEMPERATURE SENSITIVE ELEMENTSHEAT FLUXTEMPERATURE MEASURING INSTRUMENTSAvailable DownloadsNameType19980206267.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Temperature and Release Summary for Shasta and Trinity - April 2010

Sacramento River Water Temperatures in Degrees F

Day Collected from CDEC (California Data Exchange Center) in CFS

Control

TCD SHD minus Point Shasta Spring Crk 

Wt. TCD 4/15 to 4/30 Generation Powerplant 

Avg. (Diff) Shd Spp Kwk Bsf Jlf Bnd Rdb Lws Ccr El 815 Release 

Mar Avg 48.5 47.7 48.6 49.0 50.9 51.7 51.6 52.4 47.8 49.9 2,257 703 

Apr

1 48.8 (0.6) 48.2 49.2 49.1 50.8 51.2 51.1 51.9 49.2 50.1 2,707 128 

2 49.3 (1.3) 48.0 49.4 48.9 50.1 50.8 51.0 51.3 ? 47.9 49.0 2,665 106 

3 49.8 (1.7) 48.1 49.5 48.8 48.4 48.7 48.6 49.6 48.2 49.1 2,380 50 

4 49.2 (1.0) 48.2 49.4 48.6 49.1 49.5 49.4 49.2 47.6 48.6 3,176 50 5 49.4 (1.1) 48.3 49.4 48.3 48.5 48.8 48.5 49.2 47.6 48.9 3,148 50 6 49.9 (1.6) 48.3 49.4 48.4 50.1 51.0 50.8 51.1 47.6 49.6 3,398 189 7 49.0 (0.5) 48.5 49.7 49.0 52.4 53.2 53.1 53.3 47.7 50.6 2,509 52 8 50.0 (1.3) 48.7 49.6 49.7 53.8 55.0 54.9 55.6 47.8 51.1 2,371 50 9 49.8 (0.8) 49.0 49.6 49.9 52.7 53.7 53.7 ND 48.0 51.1 2,712 50 

10 49.1 (0.5) 48.6 49.4 49.8 52.8 53.7 53.9 ND 48.0 50.7 2,834 189 11 49.2 (1.1) 48.1 49.1 49.8 51.4 51.8 51.8 ND 48.2 50.0 2,955 136 12 49.8 (0.9) 48.9 49.3 ? 49.5 50.4 50.1 49.9 ND 48.7 49.7 2,789 50 13 48.8 (0.3) 48.5 49.0 49.0 51.7 51.9 51.5 ND 49.0 50.5 2,528 892 14 48.2 (0.3) 47.9 49.0 49.4 52.2 52.7 53.0 53.6 48.4 50.1 671 1,680 

15 48.4 (0.4) 48.0 48.9 49.6 52.5 52.9 52.7 53.2 48.7 51.1 666 1,927 16 48.8 (0.7) 48.1 48.9 49.9 54.0 54.9 55.0 55.6 48.4 51.4 1,942 1,916 17 49.5 (1.2) 48.3 48.8 50.1 54.7 55.8 55.9 56.8 49.0 51.9 2,097 1,896 18 50.0 (1.7) 48.3 48.9 50.5 55.1 56.5 56.8 57.8 49.4 52.2 1,665 1,913 19 49.9 (1.6) 48.3 48.9 50.5 54.9 56.4 56.7 57.8 49.4 52.0 2,004 1,874 20 49.1 (0.7) 48.4 48.9 50.4 53.9 54.8 55.2 56.2 49.4 51.3 2,169 1,860 

21 49 0 48 4 49 1 50 5 53 2 53 6 53 7 54 4 49 6 51 6 3 170 775 

Mean Daily Releas

21 49.0 (0.6) 48.4 49.1 50.5 53.2 53.6 53.7 54.4 49.6 51.6 3,170 775 

22 49.9 (1.0) 48.9 49.4 50.3 53.9 54.5 54.5 55.0 50.2 51.8 4,255 446 23 50.1 (2.3) 47.8 49.0 50.0 54.6 55.9 56.0 56.9 50.9 51.8 5,327 434 24 48.8 (1.0) 47.8 49.3 50.7 55.1 56.7 57.0 58.1 51.0 52.1 5,755 472 25 48.7 (0.8) 47.9 49.3 50.4 55.0 56.6 56.9 58.2 51.2 52.3 5,522 490 26 48.7 (0.8) 47.9 49.3 49.6 53.6 55.3 55.8 57.2 51.2 50.6 5,075 495 27 49.5 (1.0) 48.5 49.3 49.4 53.1 54.3 54.4 55.2 51.9 50.8 5,798 480 28 49.7 (1.1) 48.6 49.8 49.2 52.0 52.5 52.9 54.2 51.2 50.1 5,713 473 29 50.6 (1.6) 49.0 49.7 49.6 51.6 52.0 52.0 52.5 49.5 50.4 5,163 491 30 50.9 (1.4) 49.5 49.8 49.9 52.5 53.1 53.2 53.8 48.9 51.0 5,862 338 

Avg 49.4 48.4 49.3 49.6 52.5 53.3 53.3 54.3 49.1 50.7 3,301 665 Tot cfs 99,026 19,952 Tot af 196,418 39,575 

# = Station out of service ^ - estimated (7 hours or less) ? = Avg. includes estimated data! = 17 hours or less of readings & = 18 to 23 hours of reading ND = No hourly readings or incorrect 

Control Point: Jellys Ferry 4/15/2010 to 4/30/2010.
#### STATE, Respondent, v. WAUL (PETERSON, intervenor, Appellant).

(241 N. W. 512.)

(File No. 7124.

Opinion filed March 15, 1932.)

For former opinion, see 59 S. D. 484, 240 N. W. 854.

*Parliamm &*Parliman, of Sioux Falls', for Appellant.

*Lu.cins*/. *Wall,*State’s Attorney, of Sioux Falls, for the State.

RUDOLPH, J.

The intervener and appellant, Peterson,' has filed a petition for rehearing. The ground upon which a rehearing is asked is that this court, in its opinion herein, 59 S. D. 484, 240 N. W. 854, overlooked the fact that, when the defendant, Waul, rented the car, he did not disclose that he was in fact Waul, but gave his name as “J. J. Miller,” and that his identity was not known to intervener or intervener’s employee who rented the car. This facts was not overlooked, but was attempted to be considered in the next to the last paragraph of the opinion. However, there 'being no specific reference in the opinion to the fact that when Waul rented the car he gave his name as “J. J. Miller,” we deem this supplemental statement of our views advisable.

Under the facts as presented in this case, we are of the opinion that it is immaterial that Waul gave his name as Miller. Our position is, that 'had appellant made an honest effort to determine who were the notorious liquor law offenders in his community, he might have discovered that Waul was such, and, because of making *534such investigation, might have been able to identify Waul. The appellant (as found by the trial court) made no effort to determine who were the notorious offenders. What the appellant would have discovered about Waul, or who Waul was, had he made such an honest effort, there is no way now to determine, because what constitutes an honest effort in this regard can only be determined when the facts are disclosed. Had the appellant made an honest effort to determine who were the notorious offenders in his community, and still not have been able to identify Waul (which we concede might be possible), an entirely different situation would be presented. But, having made no effort, the appellant is not in a position to complain.

The petition for a rehearing is denied.

CAMPBELL, P. J., and POLLEY and WARREN, JJ., concur.

ROBERTS, J., not sitting.
§ 668.250 What happens if two or more entities apply for the same area? ( a ) Every two years, unless there has been a waiver of competition for the area, we issue a Solicitation for Grant Application (SGA) seeking applicants for INA program grants.
( b ) If two or more entities apply for grants for the same service area, or for overlapping service areas, and a waiver of competition under WIA section 166(c)(2) is not granted to the incumbent grantee, the following additional procedures apply: ( 1 ) The Grant Officer will follow the regulations for priority designation at § 668.210.
( 2 ) If no applicant is entitled to priority designation, DINAP will inform each entity which submitted a NOI, including the incumbent grantee, in writing, of all the competing Notices of Intent no later than November 15 of the year the NOI's are received.
( 3 ) Each entity will have an opportunity to describe its service plan, and may submit additional information addressing the requirements of § 668.240(c) or such other information as the applicant determines is appropriate. Revised Notices must be received or contain an official U.S. Postal Service postmark, no later than January 5th (unless a later date is provided in DINAP's information notice).
( 4 ) The Grant Officer selects the entity that demonstrates the ability to produce the best outcomes for its customers.
#### § 663.830 May needs-related payments be paid while a participant is waiting to start training classes?

Yes, payments may be provided if the participant has been accepted in a training program that will begin within 30 calendar days. The Governor may authorize local areas to extend the 30 day period to address appropriate circumstances.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 414.17

 414.19

 414.05

 413.99

 413.91

 413.86

 413.96

 414.14

 414.48

 415.17

 415.74

 416.02

 416.23

 416.23

 416.23

 416.17

 416.48

 416.89

 416.78

 416.38

 415.94

 415.55

 415.30

 415.23

 415.35

 415.95

 416.82

 417.52

 417.72

 417.92

 418.14

 640,014

 640,185

 638,985

 638,471

 637,786

 637,358

 638,214

 639,757

 642,674

 648,609

 653,528

 655,949

 657,767

 657,767

 657,767

 657,248

 659,934

 663,494

 662,538

 659,067

 655,257

 651,887

 649,730

 649,126

 650,161

 655,344

 662,886

 668,977

 670,722

 672,468

 674,390

STORAGE

+0

+171

-1,200

-514

-685

-428

+856

+1,543

+2,917

+5,935

+4,919

+2,421

+1,818

+0

+0

-519

+2,686

+3,560

-956

-3,471

-3,810

-3,370

-2,157

-604

+1,035

+5,183

+7,542

+6,091

+1,745

+1,746

+1,922

CHANGE

600

300

0

0

0

0

1,240

1,254

1,931

3,630

2,947

1,650

1,200

0

0

0

2,340

2,319

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,225

3,058

4,180

3,497

1,180

1,180

1,165

PUMPING

 0

 0

 883

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 820

 1,634

 1,630

 1,626

 878

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 184

 187

 204

 199

 169

 159

 157

 162

 157

 145

 147

 145

 145

 140

 147

 146

 159

 160

 145

 141

 116

 129

 95

 118

 112

 106

 101

 109

 110

 99

 126

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-416

-27

+482

-60

-176

-57

-652

-315

-303

-493

-321

-284

-138

+140

+147

-116

-826

-365

+483

+25

-175

+56

-114

-186

-591

-339

-276

-318

-191

-201

-71

OR

 111

 97

 114

 125

 102

 53

 72

 83

 83

 64

 64

 34

 42

 42

 50

 62

 70

 79

 76

 42

 84

 106

 28

 39

 36

 31

 56

 48

 57

 57

 42

C.F.S.

 .40

 .35

 .41

 .45

 .37

 .19

 .26

 .30

 .30

 .23

 .23

 .12

 .15

 .15

 .18

 .22

 .25

 .28

 .27

 .15

 .30

 .38

 .10

 .14

 .13

 .11

 .20

 .17

 .20

 .20

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR December 20, 2012

DAILY OPERATIONS

OCTOBER 2012 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +34,376 34,896 7,471 4,419 0 -5,678 2,049 7.34 .14

ACRE-FEET +34,376 69,216 14,819 8,765 0 -11,262 4,064

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 14,819

PACHECO TUNNEL 8,765 TOTAL 23,584

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2012 TO DATE = .14

 640,014

SPILL 0 .14

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
December 2023

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. PUTAH 

SOUTH

PUTAH 

CREEK

C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

624

1 130.48 631 7 68 30 34 0 0.06 0.00

2 130.45 628 -3 62 30 34 0 0.08 0.02

3 130.30 612 -16 56 30 34 0 0.02 0.00

4 130.16 597 -15 56 30 34 0 0.05 0.00

5 129.95 576 -21 58 30 39 0 0.03 0.00

6 129.83 563 -13 70 33 44 0 0.02 0.00

7 129.75 556 -7 75 35 44 0 0.04 0.17

8 129.83 563 7 81 35 42 0 0.01 0.05

9 130.01 582 19 81 32 39 0 0.11 0.00

10 130.05 586 4 71 30 39 0 0.06 0.00

11 130.11 592 6 70 30 37 0 0.02 0.00

12 130.19 600 8 70 30 36 0 0.03 0.00

13 130.24 605 5 69 30 36 0 0.07 0.00

14 130.23 604 -1 68 34 35 0 0.06 0.00

15 130.11 592 -12 66 38 34 0 0.02 0.00

16 129.89 569 -23 72 51 33 0 0.05 0.00

17 129.99 580 11 92 53 33 0 0.07 0.00

18 129.87 567 -13 75 50 32 0 0.01 0.85

19 129.43 525 -42 60 50 31 0 0.00 1.07

20 129.42 524 -1 86 56 31 0 0.01 0.07

21 129.44 526 2 92 60 31 0 0.05 0.36

22 129.26 508 -18 84 62 31 0 0.01 0.00

23 129.33 515 7 95 60 31 0 0.05 0.00

24 129.39 521 6 93 59 31 0 0.03 0.00

25 129.42 524 3 93 60 31 0 0.03 0.00

26 129.43 525 1 92 60 31 0 0.04 0.00

27 129.55 536 11 95 58 31 0 0.01 0.00

28 129.74 555 19 94 55 29 0 0.00 0.48

29 129.76 556 1 79 51 27 0 0.01 0.03

30 129.65 546 -10 72 50 27 0 0.00 1.48

31 129.50 531 -15 70 51 27 0 0.02 0.03

TOTALS -93 2,365 1,363 1,048 0 1.07 4.61

ACRE-FEET -93 4,691 2,704 2,079 0

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Putah South Canal 2,704

Putah Creek 2,079

Total 4,782

Precipitation

This month = 4.61

October 01, 2023 To date = 6.37

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Solano Daily Operations

Run Date: 1/10/2024
### §§3851, 3852. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3546(a)(4), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2868

Section 3851, Pub. L. 96–70, title II, §2401, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 495, related to vesting of authority in the President during transition period.

Section 3852, Pub. L. 96–70, title II, §2402, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 495, related to commitment of prisoners to custody of Attorney General or Commission.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

May 2006

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Dail

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In 

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,583 0 434 0 30 0 464 7 9,910 4,401 

2-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,583 0 253 0 11 0 264 7 10,174 4,536 

3-May-06 0 27 0 0 0 27 197 2,610 51 0 21 22 72 22 79 10,196 637 

4-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 26 23 12 23 38 102 10,234 633 

5-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 26 10 0 10 26 112 10,260 628 

6-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 64 55 0 12 64 67 176 10,327 633 

7-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 27 0 0 0 27 0 203 10,327 633 

8-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 52 0 0 0 52 203 10,379 635 

9-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 27 0 0 0 27 203 10,406 649 

10-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0000 0 0 203 10,406 328 

11-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 0 12 0 12 203 10,418 408 

12-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 0 12 0 12 203 10,430 144 

13-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 0 12 0 12 203 10,442 141 

14-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0000 0 0 203 10,442 142 

15-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 12 20 12 20 215 10,462 190 

16-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 0 12 0 12 215 10,474 662 

17-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 12 12 12 12 227 10,486 249 

18-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 19 204 19 204 246 10,690 3,738 

19-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 3 177 3 177 249 10,867 4,083 

20-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 58 0 115 0 173 249 11,040 3,079 

21-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 10 57 10 57 259 11,097 2,868 

22-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 19 134 19 134 278 11,231 2,308 

23-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 29 134 29 134 307 11,365 3,414 

24-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 0 124 0 124 307 11,489 3,107 

25-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 10 191 10 191 317 11,680 3,134 

26-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 0 10 125 10 125 327 11,805 3,520 

27-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 32 64 19 48 51 112 378 11,917 3,450 

28-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 29 10 220 10 249 388 12,166 3,721 

29-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 29 58 19 115 48 173 436 12,339 3,557 

30-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 31 19 86 19 117 455 12,456 1,412 

31-May-06 0000 0 0 197 2,610 0 15 19 29 19 44 474 12,500 1,997 

Total 0 27 0 0 0 27 197 2,610 203 1128 264 1926 467 3,054 474 12,500 59,037 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)Tagged Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonTagged Red Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Yellow Light Level = ??? SeasonNo Tag Red Light Level = ??? Season* This number is determined by Winter Run Length only until the tags have been read. All tags from Winter Run Length Fish have been read and numbers are updated thru

Banks T
#### § 418.2240 Should you notify us if the information you gave us about your modified adjusted gross income for the more recent tax year changes?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1240, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
#### Alan G. SWANSTROM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, Defendant — Appellee.

No. 05-35782.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

Alan G. Swanstrom, Issaquah, WA, pro se.

Nancy Williams, Esq., Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Alan G. Swanstrom appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of his former employer, The Boeing Company (“Boeing”), in his Title VII action alleging discrimination on the basis of race. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *Vasquez v. County of Los*
      *796
      *Angeles,*349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

Prior to bringing a Title VII action in federal court, a plaintiff must exhaust his administrative remedies by timely filing a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or the appropriate state agency. *See*42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(l); *Vasquez,*349 F.3d at 644. Swanstrom’s discrimination claim fails because he never filed a charge of discrimination against Boeing with the EEOC or any other administrative agency. *See Vasquez,*349 F.3d at 644.

The district court properly denied Swanstrom’s motion to stay the proceedings based on equitable tolling because “equitable remedies are unavailable in federal court when the record shows that no administrative filing was ever made.” *Sommatino v. United States,*255 F.3d 704, 710 (9th Cir.2001) (rejecting an equitable tolling argument and affirming summary judgment on Title VII claim because the plaintiff never filed a charge of discrimination with an appropriate agency).

Swanstrom was not entitled to additional discovery because he failed to identify any evidence that would preclude summary judgment. *See Employers Teamsters Local Nos. 175 & 505 Pension Trust Fund v. Clorox Co.,*353 F.3d 1125, 1129-30 (9th Cir.2004).

AFFIRMED

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Table of Contents

Exhibit12.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Andrew J. Simmons,certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 20-F of StealthGas Inc.;

2.    Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of StealthGasInc. as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    StealthGas Inc.’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to StealthGas Inc., including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;

(b)    [Omitted];

(c)    evaluated the effectiveness of StealthGasInc.’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and presented in this annual reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

(d)    disclosed in this report any change in StealthGasInc.’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    StealthGas Inc.’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

(a)    all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectStealthGas Inc.’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)    any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in StealthGas Inc.’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

|                                         |  |  |
|-----------------------------------------|--|--|
| Date: April 19, 2006                    |
| /s/ Andrew J.Simmons                    |
| Andrew J. SimmonsChief FinancialOfficer |
|                                         |

----