alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 929.88

 929.51

 928.98

 928.27

 927.63

 926.75

 925.97

 925.37

 924.81

 924.32

 923.96

 923.56

 923.12

 922.71

 922.22

 921.78

 921.33

 920.90

 920.41

 919.95

 919.56

 919.08

 918.64

 918.06

 917.57

 917.08

 916.66

 915.94

 915.22

 914.55

 913.86

 1,564.5

 1,559.1

 1,551.4

 1,541.1

 1,531.9

 1,519.2

 1,508.1

 1,499.6

 1,491.7

 1,484.8

 1,479.7

 1,474.1

 1,467.9

 1,462.2

 1,455.4

 1,449.3

 1,443.1

 1,437.1

 1,430.4

 1,424.1

 1,418.7

 1,412.2

 1,406.2

 1,398.3

 1,391.6

 1,385.0

 1,379.4

 1,369.7

 1,360.1

 1,351.2

 1,342.1

STORAGE

-10.5

-5.4

-7.7

-10.3

-9.2

-12.6

-11.1

-8.5

-7.9

-6.9

-5.1

-5.6

-6.2

-5.7

-6.8

-6.1

-6.2

-5.9

-6.7

-6.3

-5.3

-6.6

-6.0

-7.9

-6.6

-6.6

-5.6

-9.7

-9.6

-8.9

-9.1

CHANGE

 2,082

 3,823

 2,779

 2,523

 1,518

 1,341

 1,998

 2,043

 2,270

 2,452

 3,187

 2,585

 2,588

 2,501

 2,479

 2,395

 2,263

 2,235

 1,933

 2,414

 2,766

 2,238

 2,234

 2,338

 2,481

 3,247

 3,709

 2,267

 1,593

 2,213

 2,316

INFLOW

 7,207

 6,374

 6,479

 7,530

 6,086

 7,684

 7,513

 6,211

 6,080

 5,768

 5,620

 5,277

 5,567

 5,259

 5,773

 5,331

 5,251

 5,064

 5,161

 5,440

 5,340

 5,415

 5,097

 6,171

 5,669

 6,452

 6,414

 7,041

 6,297

 6,530

 6,781

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 193

 167

 192

 174

 85

 25

 101

 125

 187

 166

 124

 132

 128

 123

 143

 139

 147

 162

 162

 157

 121

 140

 160

 147

 155

 135

 142

 98

 137

 167

 136

C.F.S.

 .45

 .39

 .45

 .41

 .20

 .06

 .24

 .30

 .45

 .40

 .30

 .32

 .31

 .30

 .35

 .34

 .36

 .40

 .40

 .39

 .30

 .35

 .40

 .37

 .39

 .34

 .36

 .25

 .35

 .43

 .35

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .08

 .37

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2014 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 8, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -232.6 74,811 187,882 0 0 4,370 10.71 .45

ACRE-FEET -232,600 148,388 372,664 0 0 8,668

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 372,664

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 372,664

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .45

JULY 1, 2014 .47

 1,575.0

Table 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 517

 550

 602

 653

 714

 589

 678

 602

 549

 566

 506

 507

 571

 449

 464

 398

 411

 440

 364

 283

 262

 253

 226

 213

 221

 223

 220

 219

 222

 217

 216

 222

 228

 255

 246

 232

 237

 230

 220

 208

 193

 174

 172

 172

 199

 195

 205

 206

 192

 166

 149

 141

 138

 138

 135

 150

 166

 160

 153

 155

 160

 172

 369

 367

 402

 429

 442

 400

 424

 392

 348

 350

 337

 331

 340

 328

 326

 298

 294

 287

 248

 207

 205

 194

 182

 177

 188

 197

 192

 188

 195

 193

 195

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 17, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM

Day High Low Mean High Low Mean High Low Mean

1 98 69 78 59.8 57.6 58.5 9.6 8.5 9.3

2 83 74 77 58.2 57.0 57.6 9.4 8.7 9.2

3 79 75 77 57.7 55.6 56.6 9.9 8.9 9.5

4 75 74 75 57.0 54.3 55.6 10.5 9.8 10.1

5 76 74 75 57.1 54.9 56.1 10.4 10.0 10.2

6 75 73 74 59.3 57.2 58.2 10.2 9.7 9.9

7 84 72 75 59.2 57.4 58.4 10.0 8.9 9.6

8 87 73 79 58.2 56.1 57.3 9.6 9.0 9.4

9 76 73 74 56.5 54.7 55.7 10.1 9.4 9.8

10 77 73 75 55.7 53.5 54.5 10.4 10.0 10.2

11 77 75 75 54.9 52.4 53.6 10.8 10.4 10.6

12 77 75 75 54.5 52.1 53.3 10.8 10.5 10.7

13 76 75 75 54.1 52.0 53.0 10.9 10.6 10.7

14 75 73 74 53.6 51.0 52.3 11.1 10.6 10.8

15 74 73 73 53.3 50.9 52.1 11.1 10.7 10.9

16 77 72 74 52.7 50.1 51.5 11.3 10.8 11.0

17 73 73 73 52.3 49.9 51.1 11.4 11.0 11.1

18 73 72 73 52.5 49.9 51.1 11.3 10.9 11.0

19 77 72 73 51.9 49.7 50.7 11.4 10.8 11.1

20 74 74 74 51.4 49.0 50.2 11.5 11.1 11.3

21 74 72 73 50.9 48.4 49.6 11.6 11.2 11.3

22 73 72 73 50.8 48.1 49.5 11.6 11.2 11.4

23 77 72 73 51.3 48.5 50.0 11.5 11.1 11.3

24 74 72 73 51.8 49.2 50.3 11.4 11.1 11.2

25 73 72 73 51.9 49.3 50.6 11.4 11.1 11.2

26 76 72 73 52.7 50.2 51.4 11.2 10.8 11.0

27 74 73 74 52.1 49.9 51.0 11.1 10.8 10.9

28 74 73 73 52.0 49.5 50.7 11.2 10.8 11.0

29 76 73 74 51.0 49.0 50.0 11.1 10.7 10.9

30 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Ripon on the Stanislaus River Water Quality

Period: November 2022 Run Date: 12/8/2022
§ 658.500 Scope and purpose of subpart. ( a ) This subpart contains the regulations governing the discontinuation of services provided by the ES to employers pursuant to parts 652 and 653 of this chapter.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart only, where the term “employer” is used, it refers to employers, agents, farm labor contractors, joint employers, and successors in interest to any employer, agent, farm labor contractor, or joint employer, as defined at § 651.10 of this chapter. A successor in interest to an employer, agent, or farm labor contractor may be held liable for the duties and obligations of that employer, agent, or farm labor contractor for purposes of recruitment of workers through the ES clearance system or enforcement of ES regulations, regardless of whether such successor in interest has succeeded to all the rights and liabilities of the predecessor entity.
[89 FR 34065, Apr. 29, 2024]
### §58. Repealed. Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1131(8), 60 Stat. 1036

Section, R.S. §1696, related to expenses of vice consulate or consular agency.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective three months after Aug. 13, 1946, see act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, title XI, §1141, 60 Stat. 1040.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4284 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4284

 To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
  issue regulations providing examples of a failure to comply in good 
   faith with the requirements of prime contractors with respect to 
                         subcontracting plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2015

 Mr. Curbelo of Florida (for himself, Ms. Clarke of New York, and Mr. 
   Chabot) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Administrator of the Small Business Administration to 
  issue regulations providing examples of a failure to comply in good 
   faith with the requirements of prime contractors with respect to 
                         subcontracting plans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Service Provider Opportunity 
Clarification Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. GOOD FAITH COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF PRIME 
              CONTRACTORS WITH RESPECT TO SUBCONTRACTING PLANS.

    Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Administrator of the Small Business Administration shall issue 
regulations providing examples of activities that would be considered a 
failure to make a good faith effort to comply with the requirements 
imposed on an entity (other than a small business concern as defined 
under section 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)) that is 
awarded a prime contract containing the clauses required under 
paragraphs (4) or (5) of section 8(d) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 637(d)).
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose DE JESUS BAENA-AGUILAR, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40976.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*638Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose De Jesus Baena-Aguilar (Baena) appeals his illegal reentry conviction, challenging the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), (2). Baena’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Baena contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *AlmendarezTorres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert, denied,*— U.S. - — ■, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Baena properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### § 641.350 How should public comments be solicited and collected?

The Governor, or the highest government official, should follow established State procedures to solicit and collect public comments. The State Plan must include a description of the State's procedures and schedule for ensuring an open and inclusive planning process that provides meaningful opportunity for public comment.
EXHIBIT 10.23

AMENDMENT

TO THE

AFFINIA GROUP HOLDINGS INC.

2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

(Effective December 2, 2010)

THIS AMENDMENT to the Affinia Group Holdings Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the
Plan), is hereby adopted and approved by the Board of Directors of Affinia Group Holdings Inc. (the Company) as of December 2, 2010.

R E C I T A L S

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in
accordance under Section 15(a) of the Plan;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of December 2,
2010, as set forth below:

A M E N D M E N T



| | 1. | Shares Subject to the Plan. The first sentence of Section 3 of the Plan is hereby deleted and the following sentence shall be inserted in amended to read in
its entirety as follows:
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The total number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is 350,000.



| | 2. | The Plan shall in all other respects remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this amendment as of the 2ndday of December, 2010.



AFFINIA GROUP HOLDINGS INC.By

: /s/ Thomas H. Madden


Name:

Thomas H. MaddenTitle:

Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Cellcom I Corp.
Las Vegas, Nevada

We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of Cellcom I Corp. as of
December 31, 2005, the related statements of operations, and cash flows for the
three-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related statement
of changes in stockholders' equity for the three-month period ended December 31,
2005. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the
financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying financial statements referred to above for them to
be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.


/s/ PIERCY BOWLER TAYLOR & KERN

Las Vegas, Nevada
March 8, 2006


                                       13
#### Nicholas Monte, an Infant, by Anthony Monte, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. Abraham Straus, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
(April 28, 1948.)

#### Middletown Manufacturing Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Electronic Corporation of America, Respondent.

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. ■
#### Marisa Morel et al., Respondents, v. Elisha Hanson et al., Appellants.

Ho opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 130.85

 130.90

 130.83

 130.77

 130.83

 130.84

 130.81

 130.52

 130.89

 130.81

 130.80

 130.86

 130.85

 130.85

 130.92

 130.78

 130.75

 130.79

 130.78

 130.76

 130.66

 130.71

 130.56

 130.83

 130.88

 130.83

 130.78

 130.71

 130.74

 130.79

 130.83

 673

 678

 670

 664

 670

 671

 668

 635

 677

 668

 667

 674

 673

 673

 680

 665

 662

 666

 665

 663

 651

 657

 640

 670

 676

 670

 665

 657

 660

 666

 670

STORAGE

+11

+5

-8

-6

+6

+1

-3

-33

+42

-9

-1

+7

-1

+0

+7

-15

-3

+4

-1

-2

-12

+6

-17

+30

+6

-6

-5

-8

+3

+6

+4

CHANGE

670

640

688

669

634

608

597

599

612

591

601

608

596

573

575

579

648

654

635

609

596

584

576

591

554

513

500

516

529

509

498

INFLOW

 41

 40

 40

 40

 40

 40

 39

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 37

 35

PUTAH

 622

 596

 651

 631

 590

 566

 559

 578

 553

 558

 564

 566

 559

 536

 533

 549

 612

 614

 597

 572

 564

 543

 547

 538

 513

 478

 465

 482

 489

 468

 460

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 0

 1

 1

 1

 1

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .32

 .25

 .30

 .32

 .21

 .31

 .32

 .38

 .29

 .30

 .32

 .28

 .40

 .03

 .34

 .38

 .34

 .35

 .44

 .31

 .39

 .27

 .27

 .26

 .29

 .29

 .28

 .26

 .29

 .26

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2012 RUN DATE: 09/04/2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +8 18,352 17,153 1,166 31 9.35 .00

ACRE-FEET +8 36,401 34,023 2,313 61

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,313

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 34,023

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2012 .00

 662

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4395 

To repeal the provision permitting the use of rocket engines from the Russian 

Federation for the evolved expendable launch vehicle program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2016 

Mr. MCCARTHY (for himself and Mr. HUNTER) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the provision permitting the use of rocket engines 

from the Russian Federation for the evolved expendable 

launch vehicle program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROVISION PERMITTING THE USE 

4 OF ROCKET ENGINES FROM THE RUSSIAN 

5 FEDERATION FOR THE EVOLVED EXPEND6 ABLE LAUNCH VEHICLE PROGRAM. 

7 Section 8048 of the Department of Defense Appro8 priations Act, 2016 (division C of Public Law 114–113) 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4395 IH

1 is repealed and shall be deemed never to have been en2 acted. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Morrill Goddard, Appellant, v. Charles T. Yerkes and Others, Defendants. Louis S. Owsley, as Executor, etc., Respondent.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dolce Ventures,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Carl E. Worboys,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/S/ CARL E. WORBOYS
----------------
CARL E. WORBOYS
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL
OFFICER, DOLCE VENTURES, INC.
DATE


















                                  END OF FILING
§ 641.853 How are costs classified? ( a ) All costs must be classified as “administrative costs” or “programmatic activity costs.” (OAA § 502(c)(6)).
( b ) Recipients and sub-recipients must assign participants' wage and benefit costs and other participant (enrollee) costs such as supportive services to the programmatic activity cost category. (See § 641.864). When a participant's community service assignment involves functions whose costs are normally classified as administrative costs, compensation provided to the participants must be charged as programmatic activity costs instead of administrative costs, since participant wage and benefit costs are always charged to the programmatic activity cost category.
#### § 668.840 What cost principles apply to INA funds?

The cost principles described in OMB Circulars A-87 (for tribal governments), A-122 (for private non-profits), and A-21 (for educational institutions), and the regulations at 20 CFR 667.200(c), apply to INA grantees, depending on the nature of the grantee organization.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.71 CO-ordered assisted recruitment. ( a ) *Requirement of assisted recruitment.* If, as a result of audit or otherwise, the CO determines that a violation has occurred that does not warrant debarment, the CO may require the employer to engage in assisted recruitment for a defined period of time for any future *Application for Temporary Employment Certification.*
( b ) *Notification of assisted recruitment.* The CO will notify the employer (and its attorney or agent, if applicable) in writing of the assisted recruitment that will be required of the employer for a period of up to 2 years from the date the notice is issued. The notification will state the reasons for the imposition of the additional requirements, state that the employer's agreement to accept the conditions will constitute their inclusion as bona fide conditions and terms of an application for temporary employment certification, and offer the employer an opportunity to request an administrative review. If administrative review is requested, the procedures in § 655.61 apply.
( c ) *Assisted recruitment.* The assisted recruitment process will be in addition to any recruitment required of the employer by §§ 655.41 through 655.46 and may consist of, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Requiring the employer to submit a draft advertisement to the CO for review and approval at the time of filing the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification;*
( 2 ) Designating the sources where the employer must recruit for U.S. workers and directing the employer to place the advertisement(s) in such sources;
( 3 ) Extending the length of the placement of the advertisement and/or job order;
( 4 ) Requiring the employer to notify the CO and the SWA in writing when the advertisement(s) are placed;
( 5 ) Requiring an employer to perform any additional assisted recruitment directed by the CO;
( 6 ) Requiring the employer to provide proof of the publication of all advertisements as directed by the CO, in addition to providing a copy of the job order;
( 7 ) Requiring the employer to provide proof of all SWA referrals made in response to the job order;
( 8 ) Requiring the employer to submit any proof of contact with all referrals and past U.S. workers; and/or
( 9 ) Requiring the employer to provide any additional documentation verifying it conducted the assisted recruitment as directed by the CO.
( d ) *Failure to comply.* If an employer materially fails to comply with requirements ordered by the CO under this section, the certification will be denied and the employer and/or its attorney or agent may be debarred under § 655.73.
[42 FR 45899, Sept. 13, 1977, as amended at 84 FR 62447, Nov. 15, 2019]
### §7714. Coordination with United States Agency for International Development

#### (a) Requirement for coordination

The Chief Executive Officer shall consult with the Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development in order to coordinate the activities of the Corporation with the activities of the Agency.

#### (b) USAID programs

The Administrator of the United States Agency for International Development shall seek to ensure that appropriate programs of the Agency play a primary role in preparing candidate countries to become eligible countries.

(Pub. L. 108–199, div. D, title VI, §615, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 224.)