alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, James P. Wilson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006 of JK Acquisition Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: March 30, 2007     /s/ James P. Wilson   James P. Wilson  *Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer)*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6647
ERIC D. HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RUFUS FLEMING, et als, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-273-R) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: June 18, 1996 Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric D. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissingwithout prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court's dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers' Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice could be final if "no amendment [to the complaint] could cure defects in the plaintiff's case." Id. at 1067. In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine "whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending the complaint." Id. at 1066-67. Since Appellant could have amended his complaint to assert some claims, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because we find the order is not appealable. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Pincus Fingerhut v. Louis Hirsch et al. and David L. Davidoff et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 902

 1,067

 1,072

 1,017

 1,112

 975

 1,020

 1,077

 1,151

 1,176

 1,110

 1,236

 1,181

 1,328

 1,170

 1,099

 952

 1,163

 1,143

 1,248

 1,203

 1,398

 1,435

 1,135

 1,052

 1,094

 1,025

 1,046

 1,105

 873

 262

 274

 274

 262

 241

 241

 228

 250

 232

 268

 178

 308

 277

 282

 249

 249

 218

 228

 227

 240

 202

 267

 250

 250

 263

 266

 296

 238

 220

 188

 536

 545

 541

 536

 523

 523

 535

 548

 580

 607

 571

 650

 645

 739

 678

 570

 565

 551

 585

 591

 614

 701

 646

 564

 560

 573

 563

 552

 544

 477

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 679.640 What limitations apply to the State's workforce flexibility plan authority under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act? ( a ) ( 1 ) Under work-flex waiver authority a State must not waive the WIOA, Wagner-Peyser Act or OAA requirements which are excepted from the work-flex waiver authority and described in § 679.630(a).
( 2 ) Requests to waive statutory and regulatory requirements of title I of WIOA applicable at the State level may not be granted under work-flex waiver authority granted to a State. Such requests only may be granted by the Secretary under the general waiver authority described at §§ 679.610 through 679.620.
( b ) As required in § 679.630(b)(6), States must address the outcomes to result from work-flex waivers as part of its workforce flexibility plan. The Secretary may terminate a State's work-flex designation if the State fails to meet agreed-upon outcomes or other terms and conditions contained in its workforce flexibility plan.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,074

 18,876

 21,231

 20,109

 18,330

 14,278

 12,091

 10,872

 9,517

 9,488

 10,659

 9,326

 7,429

 4,062

 3,429

 4,495

 1,630

 1,001

 785

 682

 704

 631

 568

 502

 462

 433

 428

 361

 348

 389

 419

 9,076

 9,905

 10,238

 8,554

 7,742

 6,517

 4,199

 3,042

 2,888

 2,277

 3,095

 2,835

 1,582

 783

 705

 360

 519

 440

 386

 419

 488

 432

 423

 349

 316

 298

 305

 300

 285

 289

 293

 13,221

 13,575

 15,119

 13,971

 12,143

 10,405

 7,101

 6,814

 5,931

 5,675

 7,307

 5,935

 3,362

 1,876

 1,449

 1,325

 908

 710

 628

 565

 550

 505

 480

 440

 383

 352

 356

 330

 315

 314

 321

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 6, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
### §4224. Fees; accounting; stamps

The provisions of sections 1196 1 and 4223 of this title, relative to official fees and the method of accounting therefor shall apply to diplomatic officers below the grade of minister and to consular officers.

(May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §18, formerly §11, 43 Stat. 142, renumbered and amended Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1209.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 1196 of this title, referred to in text, was repealed by act June 28, 1955, ch. 196, 69 Stat. 187.

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

Section was formerly classified to section 812 of this title, and prior thereto to section 13 of this title.

#### Amendments

1931—Act Feb. 23, 1931, substituted "shall apply to diplomatic officers below the grade of minister and to consular officers" for "shall include both branches of the Foreign Service".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1931 Amendment

Act May 24, 1924, ch. 182, §37, as added act Feb. 23, 1931, ch. 276, §7, 46 Stat. 1217, provided: "That this Act [see Tables for classification] shall take effect on July 1, 1931."

1 See References in Text note below.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 180

 188

 196

 226

 242

 235

 234

 225

 244

 260

 230

 207

 189

 234

 297

 337

 353

 437

 475

 496

 494

 463

 532

 541

 466

 438

 456

 525

 571

 658

 755

 135

 134

 125

 126

 130

 126

 119

 119

 121

 123

 120

 120

 118

 120

 123

 136

 141

 128

 131

 147

 155

 141

 138

 141

 133

 136

 139

 141

 136

 139

 138

 161

 161

 157

 162

 168

 164

 159

 159

 158

 163

 160

 161

 151

 157

 179

 202

 217

 241

 263

 283

 273

 259

 272

 277

 260

 249

 249

 268

 307

 333

 348

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2009 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: August 4, 2009

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

DAY

 5,837

 5,449

 6,767

 6,136

 1,910

 3,247

 4,369

 4,151

 5,167

 3,426

 4,011

 4,303

 4,020

 3,233

 3,040

 126,426

 125,650

 124,544

 124,745

 124,337

 119,935

 117,023

 115,322

 113,499

 112,733

 110,351

 108,644

 107,300

 105,754

 103,537

 397,737

 398,901

 398,689

 399,119

 403,753

 406,818

 408,608

 410,527

 411,334

 413,841

 415,638

 417,053

 418,680

 420,000

 420,000

 1,232,031

 1,235,637

 1,234,980

 1,236,310

 1,250,665

 1,260,160

 1,265,705

 1,271,648

 1,274,147

 1,281,913

 1,287,480

 1,291,863

 1,296,904

 1,300,000

 1,300,000

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2008 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: August 8, 2008

 132,263

 131,099

 131,311

 130,881

 126,247

 123,182

 121,392

 119,473

 118,666

 116,159

 114,362

 112,947

 111,320

 108,987

 106,577

 67,969

 64,363

 65,020

 63,690

 49,335

 39,840

 34,295

 28,352

 25,853

 18,087

 12,520

 8,137

 3,096

 0

 0

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 1,090,839

 1,105,782

 1,120,725

 1,135,668

 1,150,611

 1,165,554

 1,180,497

 1,195,440

 1,210,383

 1,225,326

 1,240,269

 1,255,212

 1,270,155

 1,285,098

 1,300,041

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 3.0976

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 133,080
<page>  EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		August 14, 2008
#### § 618.856 Information, reports, and studies.

A State must furnish to the Department such information and reports and conduct such studies as the Department determines are necessary or appropriate for carrying out the purposes of the Act and this part.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 4,636

 4,756

 4,854

 4,405

 4,466

 5,089

 6,497

 7,867

 9,927

 21,986

 26,383

 15,471

 11,434

 9,365

 8,850

 8,907

 8,643

 8,235

 6,825

 7,828

 13,818

 25,584

 16,145

 14,879

 18,738

 15,435

 14,741

 11,914

 102,620

 101,893

 101,316

 100,862

 100,004

 99,246

 99,118

 100,335

 102,791

 107,083

 122,615

 141,548

 149,168

 152,572

 153,840

 154,556

 155,290

 155,736

 155,772

 154,468

 154,181

 159,599

 175,924

 182,465

 187,477

 195,904

 200,772

 204,738

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 420,000

 417,282

 400,931

 381,002

 372,981

 369,398

 368,063

 367,310

 366,537

 366,067

 366,029

 367,403

 367,704

 362,001

 344,817

 337,931

 332,656

 323,785

 318,661

 314,487

 313,348

 598,080

 613,032

 627,984

 642,936

 657,888

 672,840

 687,792

 702,744

 713,051

 699,385

 678,183

 677,184

 683,829

 694,461

 706,116

 717,680

 729,792

 742,746

 758,613

 772,326

 773,235

 748,805

 745,882

 746,080

 737,712

 737,381

 738,918

 747,398

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: May 16, 2007

 107,256

 106,649

 106,170

 105,267

 104,470

 104,335

 105,615

 108,202

 112,718

 129,069

 148,998

 157,019

 160,602

 161,937

 162,690

 163,463

 163,933

 163,971

 162,597

 162,296

 167,999

 185,183

 192,069

 197,344

 206,215

 211,339

 215,513

 216,652

 701,920

 686,968

 672,016

 657,064

 642,112

 627,160

 612,208

 597,256

 586,949

 600,615

 621,817

 622,816

 616,171

 605,539

 593,884

 582,320

 570,208

 557,254

 541,387

 527,674

 526,765

 551,195

 554,118

 553,920

 562,288

 562,619

 561,082

 552,602

 3,850,000

 3,865,000

 3,880,000

 3,895,000

 3,910,000

 3,925,000

 3,940,000

 3,955,000

 3,965,000

 3,951,000

 3,930,000

 3,929,000

 3,936,000

 3,946,000

 3,958,000

 3,970,000

 3,982,000

 3,995,000

 4,011,000

 4,024,000

 4,025,000

 4,001,000

 3,998,000

 3,998,000

 3,990,000

 3,989,000

 3,991,000

 3,999,000

 1.4240

 1.4596

 1.4952

 1.5308

 1.5664

 1.6020

 1.6376

 1.6732

 1.7088

 1.7444

 1.7800

 1.8156

 1.8512

 1.8868

 1.9224

 1.9580

 1.9936

 2.0292

 2.0648

 2.1004

 2.1360

 2.1716

 2.2072

 2.2428

 2.2784

 2.3140

 2.3496

 2.3852

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 108,021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27.1   FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the interim
condensed consolidated financial statements of Dental/Medical Diagnostic
Systems, Inc. as of and for the nine-month period ended September 30, 1999
included in this report on Form 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                   U.S.-DOLLARS

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1.6457
<CASH>                                       4,780,324
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,461,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                  9,214,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             23,207,678
<PP&E>                                       2,050,119
<DEPRECIATION>                               696,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               27,126,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        12,912,140
<BONDS>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     63,949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                   14,025,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 27,126,629
<SALES>                                      27,626,340
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             27,626,340
<CGS>                                        14,471,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                13,270,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           733,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (736,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (756,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                (756,931)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.13)


</TABLE>
#### § 669.555 Do the WIA administrative cost limits for States and local areas apply to NFJP grants?

No, under 20 CFR 667.210(b), limits on administrative costs for NFJP grants will be negotiated with the grantee and identified in the grant award document.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Changes in the saltwaterinterface corresponding to the installation of a seepage barrier near LakeOkeechobee, Florida**
 
Report
Appendices: One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.76:2014-1256
Item Number:0624-H (online)
CGP systemNumber:000943056
 
May 1, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 130.94

 131.01

 130.96

 130.94

 130.85

 130.85

 130.85

 130.82

 130.85

 131.00

 131.03

 131.01

 130.03

 131.26

 131.25

 130.98

 130.87

 130.89

 131.15

 131.06

 131.04

 131.11

 131.06

 130.87

 130.90

 130.94

 130.96

 131.09

 131.08

 131.09

 683

 691

 685

 683

 673

 673

 673

 669

 673

 690

 694

 691

 584

 721

 720

 688

 675

 677

 708

 697

 695

 703

 697

 675

 678

 683

 685

 701

 700

 701

STORAGE

+0

+8

-6

-2

-10

+0

+0

-4

+4

+17

+4

-3

-107

+137

-32

-13

+2

+31

-11

-2

+8

-6

-22

+3

+5

+2

+16

+1

CHANGE

670

670

689

682

685

692

701

706

682

653

621

635

613

476

747

779

785

772

791

792

828

829

794

728

715

712

725

716

707

726

INFLOW

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

 43

PUTAH

 626

 622

 648

 639

 646

 648

 657

 664

 636

 600

 575

 593

 623

 361

 703

 750

 747

 726

 731

 754

 784

 780

 753

 695

 669

 665

 680

 664

 664

 681

PUTAH

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 3

 2

 2

 2

 2

 1

 1

 2

 2

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

 1

C.F.S.

 .32

 .31

 .31

 .25

 .32

 .30

 .29

 .23

 .16

 .27

 .27

 .29

 .34

 .71

 .61

 .47

 .55

 .44

 .31

 .34

 .42

 .39

 .27

 .30

 .30

 .37

 .33

 .33

 .35

 .33

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-SOLANO PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 RUN DATE: 07/03/2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +20 21,321 19,984 1,290 38 10.48 .34

ACRE-FEET +20 42,290 39,638 2,559 75

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

PUTAH CREEK 2,559

PUTAH SOUTH CANAL 39,638

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .34

JULY 1, 1999 24.83

 683

LAKE SOLANO DAILY OPERATIONS

SOUTH CREEK
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 13, 2015

t1110

Order 

Clerk

November 13, 2015

149663

ROBERTO LANDIN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149663

COA: 309258 

Saginaw CC: 08-002400-NZ

HEALTHSOURCE SAGINAW, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral 

arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we VACATE our order of 

April 3, 2015. The application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2014 judgment of the Court 

of Appeals is DENIED, because we are no longer persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.