alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,013.48

 1,012.85

 1,012.15

 1,011.44

 1,010.67

 1,010.03

 1,009.30

 1,008.58

 1,007.92

 1,007.27

 1,006.60

 1,005.93

 1,005.21

 1,004.56

 1,003.75

 1,002.95

 1,002.22

 1,001.57

 1,000.85

 1,000.24

 999.55

 998.80

 998.05

 997.46

 996.74

 996.05

 995.34

 994.73

 994.12

 993.56

 992.95

 3,132.2

 3,117.5

 3,101.3

 3,084.9

 3,067.1

 3,052.4

 3,035.8

 3,019.3

 3,004.4

 2,989.7

 2,974.5

 2,959.5

 2,943.4

 2,928.9

 2,910.9

 2,893.2

 2,877.1

 2,862.8

 2,847.1

 2,833.8

 2,818.8

 2,802.5

 2,786.3

 2,773.6

 2,758.2

 2,743.5

 2,728.4

 2,715.4

 2,702.5

 2,690.8

 2,677.9

STORAGE

-14.9

-14.7

-16.2

-16.4

-17.7

-14.7

-16.7

-16.4

-15.0

-14.7

-15.1

-15.1

-16.1

-14.5

-18.0

-17.7

-16.1

-14.3

-15.8

-13.3

-15.0

-16.3

-16.2

-12.7

-15.4

-14.7

-15.1

-12.9

-12.9

-11.8

-12.8

CHANGE

 3,206

 3,321

 2,430

 2,667

 2,023

 2,791

 3,301

 2,648

 3,318

 3,359

 3,094

 2,561

 3,152

 3,370

 1,917

 2,410

 3,016

 3,480

 2,744

 3,794

 3,105

 2,438

 2,086

 3,083

 2,254

 2,089

 2,533

 3,454

 2,471

 3,247

 2,726

INFLOW

 10,503

 10,416

 10,356

 10,719

 10,691

 9,934

 11,412

 10,658

 10,630

 10,504

 10,458

 9,872

 10,979

 10,395

 10,712

 11,064

 10,863

 10,383

 10,482

 10,226

 10,405

 10,401

 9,998

 9,254

 9,778

 9,251

 9,886

 9,743

 8,734

 8,928

 8,934

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 240

 308

 266

 224

 277

 270

 302

 261

 247

 266

 252

 284

 296

 282

 281

 273

 259

 290

 206

 269

 262

 235

 253

 221

 258

 269

 256

 230

 236

 260

 253

C.F.S.

 .35

 .45

 .39

 .33

 .41

 .40

 .45

 .39

 .37

 .40

 .38

 .43

 .45

 .43

 .43

 .42

 .40

 .45

 .32

 .42

 .41

 .37

 .40

 .35

 .41

 .43

 .41

 .37

 .38

 .42

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2020 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 4, 2020

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -469.2 88,088 316,569 0 0 8,086 12.43 .03

ACRE-FEET -469,200 174,723 627,915 0 0 16,039

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 627,915

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 627,915

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .03

JULY 1, 2020 .03

 3,147.2

Table 3

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 34.44
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Letter providing additional information concerning the ownership of Whitejets Transportes A?reos Ltda.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 2909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1031]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2012 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 2909]]



COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 43

RIN 3038-AD08


Real-Time Public Reporting of Swap Transaction Data

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects language in the final rule published in 
the Federal Register of Monday, January 9, 2012, regarding the Real-
Time Public Reporting of Swap Transaction Data. The Commission adopted 
rules to implement a framework for the real-time public reporting of 
swap transaction and pricing data for all swap transactions.

DATES: Effective March 9, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey L. Steiner, Special Counsel, 
Division of Market Oversight (``DMO''), at (202) 418-5482 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de7fef9e8e4e3e8ffcdeeebf9eea3eae2fb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e243d3a2b27202b3c0e2d283a2d60292138">[email protected]</span></a>; or Susan Nathan, Senior Special Counsel, DMO, at 
(202) 418-5133 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfbca1aebba7aea18faca9bbace1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4c3f222d38242d220c2f2a382f622b233a">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the final rule, FR Doc. 2011-33173, on page 1228 in the issue of 
Monday, January 9, 2012, the following correction is made:
    On page 1228 in the middle column, beginning on the twelfth line 
from the top, the text ``(1) July 16, 2012 of this Adopting Release in 
the Federal Register,'' is corrected to read ``(1) July 16, 2012,''.

    Dated: January 13, 2012.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-1031 Filed 1-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### E. L. Sweet *v.*L. C. Garwood.

Party *plaintiff—right of payee of note to erase indorsement.*If the payee of a negotiable instrument has actually parted with the same, and transferred the title by indorsement, but, subsequently, becomes its owner, he will have the right to erase his indorsement, and reinvest himself with the legal title, and he may do this at any time, if the owner at the time the suit is brought, and he may do the same where he has never, in fact, parted with the title.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Champaign county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Sweet & Day, for the appellant.

Mr. Thomas J. Smith, for the appellee.

Mr. Justice Sheldon

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was a suit upon a due-bill in favor of the appellee, against the appellant, where the former recovered. The only question presented is, whether the suit was properly brought in the name of the appellee.

On the back of the due-bill there was the indorsement, in blank, of the name of the payee, the appellee.

At the trial below, the justice of the peace before whom the suit was originally brought testified, on behalf of the defendant, that the due-bill was left with him, for collection, by Mr. Sherfy, a member of the firm of D. Gardner & Co.; that he did not know who was the real owner at that time.

The plaintiff then testified, in his own behalf, that he was *408the owner of the due-bill; that he left it with D. Gardner *&*Co., for collection, in the spring when he went to Colorado; that they never had any interest in it; that it had been his all the time. This was all the evidence.

Thereupon, on leave granted by the court, on motion of the plaintiff, he erased his indorsement in blank on the due-bill, to which the defendant excepted.

Even where the payee of a negotiable instrument has actually parted with the same, and transferred the title by indorsement, if he subsequently becomes the owner of the instrument, his right to erase his own indorsement, and thereby reinvest himself with the legal title to the instrument, and the right to maintain a suit in his own name, is too well settled by authority to be questioned, and he may do this at the trial, if he was the owner at the time the suit was commenced.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
### §6982. Administrative authorities

In carrying out the programs authorized by section 6981 of this title, the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of Labor (in consultation with the Secretary of State) may utilize any of the authorities contained in the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2151 et seq.] and the Foreign Service Act of 1980 [22 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.].

(Pub. L. 106–286, div. B, title V, §512, Oct. 10, 2000, 114 Stat. 906.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424, which is classified principally to chapter 32 (§2151 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

The Foreign Service Act of 1980, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–465, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2071, which is classified principally to chapter 52 (§3901 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3901 of this title and Tables.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 536.55

 536.32

 536.37

 536.56

 536.80

 537.28

 537.43

 537.73

 538.01

 538.33

 538.46

 538.67

 539.12

 538.65

 538.07

 537.45

 536.59

 535.68

 534.82

 534.68

 533.96

 533.29

 532.68

 531.86

 531.13

 529.99

 528.79

 527.70

 526.78

 526.23

 1,946,455

 1,943,574

 1,944,201

 1,946,580

 1,949,588

 1,955,607

 1,957,490

 1,961,256

 1,964,774

 1,968,798

 1,970,433

 1,973,075

 1,978,742

 1,972,824

 1,965,528

 1,957,741

 1,946,956

 1,935,567

 1,924,825

 1,923,078

 1,914,104

 1,905,766

 1,898,186

 1,888,012

 1,878,971

 1,864,883

 1,850,092

 1,836,693

 1,825,410

 1,818,676

STORAGE

-7,396

-2,881

+627

+2,379

+3,008

+6,019

+1,883

+3,766

+3,518

+4,024

+1,635

+2,642

+5,667

-5,918

-7,296

-7,787

-10,785

-11,389

-10,742

-1,747

-8,974

-8,338

-7,580

-10,174

-9,041

-14,088

-14,791

-13,399

-11,283

-6,734

CHANGE

1,394

661

1,111

1,445

1,734

3,309

1,426

2,307

2,224

2,603

2,846

1,571

3,140

0

175

0

0

0

0

298

491

34

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1,176

PUMPING

 4,936

 1,916

 436

 0

 0

 0

 250

 149

 163

 246

 1,928

 0

 0

 3,280

 3,644

 3,828

 5,274

 5,670

 5,314

 944

 4,465

 4,292

 3,558

 4,835

 4,336

 6,954

 7,382

 6,699

 5,670

 3,746

POWER

 175

 150

 169

 144

 144

 173

 165

 165

 169

 206

 228

 228

 193

 178

 164

 165

 159

 154

 167

 176

 187

 195

 183

 166

 162

 73

 146

 147

 152

 156

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-11

-48

-190

-102

-73

-101

-61

-94

-118

-122

+134

-12

-90

+475

-45

+68

-5

+82

+66

-59

-363

+250

-80

-128

-60

-76

+71

+91

+134

-669

OR

 138

 32

 73

 102

 73

 106

 65

 94

 118

 122

 94

 90

 90

 118

 102

 93

 45

 89

 105

 129

 93

 125

 80

 128

 60

 76

 92

 131

 99

 99

C.F.S.

 .34

 .08

 .18

 .25

 .18

 .25

 .16

 .23

 .29

 .30

 .23

 .22

 .22

 .29

 .25

 .23

 .11

 .22

 .26

 .32

 .23

 .31

 .20

 .32

 .15

 .19

 .23

 .33

 .25

 .25

INCHES

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .10

 .11

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .10

 .10

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .04

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR June 11, 2003

DAILY OPERATIONS

APRIL 2003 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -135,175 27,945 89,915 5,039 0 -1,136 2,861 7.07 .58

ACRE-FEET -135,175 55,429 178,346 9,995 0 -2,253 5,675

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 178,346

PACHECO TUNNEL 9,995 TOTAL 188,341

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2002 TO DATE = 8.63

 1,953,851

SPILL 0 .58

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 150

 155

 153

 153

 153

 155

 155

 155

 155

 154

 154

 156

 160

 162

 160

 157

 156

 154

 154

 155

 156

 157

 160

 159

 159

 158

 157

 159

 158

 156

 155

 137

 144

 147

 146

 150

 150

 148

 147

 147

 147

 147

 148

 149

 151

 155

 154

 152

 150

 149

 150

 151

 151

 152

 152

 152

 151

 151

 151

 152

 152

 150

 144

 148

 150

 151

 151

 152

 151

 150

 150

 149

 150

 151

 153

 157

 157

 155

 154

 152

 151

 152

 153

 153

 154

 154

 154

 153

 153

 153

 155

 154

 152

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 22, 2011

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### N. N. Brumback et al. v. American Bank of Beatrice.

Filed February 17, 1898.

No. 7865.

Trial: Opening and Closing. The party to an action upon whom rests the burden of the issues is entitled, on the trial of the cause, to open and close the evidence; also the arguments to the jury. *Hickman v. La une,*47 Neb. 177, followed.

Error from the district court of Gage,county. Tried below before Bush, J.

*lierersed.*

*J. E. Gobbey*and *G. M. Johnston,*for plaintiffs in error.

(7. *E. White, contra.*

Harrison, C. J.

This action was instituted by the defendant in error in the district court of Gage county to recover of plaintiffs *715in error the amount alleged to be due defendant in error on a promissory note. Issues were joined, and as a result of a trial the bank received a verdict and judgment, and the opposite parties have presented the cause here for review in error proceeding.

At the inception of the trial a motion or claim was made for plaintiffs in error that they be allowed the opening and closing in the introduction of testimony and argument of the cause to the jury. This was overruled,' to which action an exception was noted for the movers and it is of the errors assigned and argued. An examination of the pleadings discloses that if there had been no evidence introduced the plaintiff in the action would have been entitled to a judgment. The issues being thus joined the motion for plaintiffs in error should have been allowed and the action thereon was an error for which the judgment must' be reversed. It is provided in section 283 of the Code of Civil Procedure: “When the jury has been sworn the trial shall proceed in the following order, unless the court for special reasons otherwise direct: * * Third — The party who would be defeated, if no evidence were given on either side, must first produce his evidence. * * The parties may then submit or argue the case to the jury. In the argument, the party required first to produce his evidence shall have the opening and conclusion.” (See *Vifquain v. Finch,*15 Neb. 505; *Rolfe v. Pilloud,*16 Neb. 21; *Omaha & R. V. R. Co. v. Walker,*17 Neb. 432; *Osborne v. Kline,*18 Neb. 344; *Rea v. Bishop,*41 Neb. 202;, *Hickman v. Layne,*47 Neb. 177.)

There is but one brief filed, it being that which contains the argument on behalf of plaintiffs in error, and as the case must be remanded supposably for another trial, we do not deem it necessary at this time to discuss the other matters presented.

Reversed and remanded.
### §3662. Appeals to Board; procedures

#### (a) Persons entitled to appeal; form; time

An employee may appeal to the Panama Canal Board of Appeals from an adverse determination made by an agency under section 3660 of this title. The appeal shall be made in writing within a reasonable time (as specified in regulations prescribed by, or under the authority of, the Commission) after the date of the transmittal by the agency to the employee of written notice of the adverse determination.

#### (b) Personal appearance

The Board may authorize, in connection with an appeal pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, a personal appearance before the Board by the employee, or by a representative of the employee designated for that purpose.

#### (c) Consideration of evidence; decision

After investigation and consideration of the evidence submitted, the Board shall—

(1) prepare a written decision on the appeal;

(2) transmit its decision to the agency concerned; and

(3) transmit copies of the decision to the employee concerned or to the designated representative.

#### (d) Finality of decision

The decision of the Board on any question or other matter relating to an appeal is final and conclusive. The agency concerned shall take action in accordance with the decision of the Board.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1222, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 467; Pub. L. 105–85, div. C, title XXXV, §3548, Nov. 18, 1997, 111 Stat. 2073.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1997—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 105–85 substituted "Commission" for "President".
#### § 418.2265 What kind of evidence of a significant modified adjusted gross income reduction will you need to support your request?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1265, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1525 Request for approval of a fee. ( a ) *Filing a request.* In order for your representative to obtain approval of a fee for services he or she performed in dealings with us, he or she shall file a written request with one of our offices. This should be done after the proceedings in which he or she was a representative are completed. The request must contain— ( 1 ) The dates the representative's services began and ended;
( 2 ) A list of the services he or she gave and the amount of time he or she spent on each type of service;
( 3 ) The amount of the fee he or she wants to charge for the services;
( 4 ) The amount of fee the representative wants to request or charge for his or her services in the same matter before any State or Federal court;
( 5 ) The amount of and a list of any expenses the representative incurred for which he or she has been paid or expects to be paid;
( 6 ) A description of the special qualifications which enabled the representative, if he or she is not an attorney, to give valuable help to you in connection with your claim; and
( 7 ) A statement showing that the representative sent a copy of the request for approval of a fee to you.
( b ) *Evaluating a request for approval of a fee.* ( 1 ) When we evaluate a representative's request for approval of a fee, we consider the purpose of the supplemental security income program, which is to assure a minimum level of income for the beneficiaries of the program, together with— ( i ) The extent and type of services the representative performed;
( ii ) The complexity of the case;
( iii ) The level of skill and competence required of the representative in giving the services;
( iv ) The amount of time the representative spent on the case;
( v ) The results the representative achieved;
( vi ) The level of review to which the claim was taken and the level of the review at which the representative became your representative; and
( vii ) The amount of fee the representative requests for his or her services, including any amount authorized or requested before, but not including the amount of any expenses he or she incurred.
( 2 ) Although we consider the amount of benefits, if any, that are payable, we do not base the amount of fee we authorize on the amount of the benefit alone, but on a consideration of all the factors listed in this section. The benefits payable in any claim are determined by specific provisions of law and are unrelated to the efforts of the representative. We may authorize a fee even if no benefits are payable.
Exhibit 31
                                  ----------


                                 CERTIFICATION
                                 -------------


I, Steve Bailey, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form
8-K containing distribution and servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of CWALT, Inc.,
Alternative Loan Trust 2005-22T1;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required
to be provided to the trustee by the master servicer under the pooling and
servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included
in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the master
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon
my knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement,
and except as disclosed in the reports, the master servicer has fulfilled its
obligations under that agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the master
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review
in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar,
agreement, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York, as
Trustee.


             Date: March 29, 2006


                                    /s/ Steve Bailey
                                    ----------------------------------
                                    Steve Bailey
                                    Senior Managing Director
### §282n. Authority to agree to amendments to Articles of Agreement

The United States Governor of the Corporation is authorized to agree to amendments to the Articles of Agreement of the Corporation that would—

(1) amend Article II, Section 2(c)(ii), to increase the vote by which the Board of Governors of the Corporation may increase the capital stock of the Corporation from a three-fourths majority to a four-fifths majority; and

(2) amend Article VII(a) to increase the vote by which the Board of Governors of the Corporation may amend the Articles of Agreement of the Corporation from a four-fifths majority to an eighty-five percent majority.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 788, §16, as added Pub. L. 102–511, title X, §1006, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3361.)