alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

STEELHEAD REPORT

January-05

Note: Bold numbers are not verified by DFG.

Steelhead Estimated Salvage Steelhead Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily T

Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag In CF

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Salvage Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Jan-05 0000 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 7,132 4,32-Jan-05 0000 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 7,403 3,93-Jan-05 0000 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 6,986 3,84-Jan-05 0000 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,187 3,85-Jan-05 0000 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 7,981 3,76-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,369 3,8

7-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 6,646 4,2

8-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,179 4,2

9-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 6,416 4,2

10-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,247 4,2

11-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,592 4,2

12-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 7,390 4,2

13-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,402 4,2

14-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,338 4,

15-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,446 4,

16-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,423 4,

17-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 7,624 4,2

18-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,275 4,2

19-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 28 8,129 4,2

20-Jan-05 0 12 0 12 12 54 0 0 0 8 0 8 8 36 8,148 4,3

21-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 12 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 36 7,879 4,3

22-Jan-05 12 0 12 0 24 54 0 0 8 0 8 0 16 36 7,872 4,3

23-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 24 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 36 7,599 4,3

24-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 24 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 36 7,659 4,3

25-Jan-05 12 0 12 0 36 54 0 0 8 0 8 0 24 36 7,492 4,3

26-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 36 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 36 7,524 4,3

27-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 36 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 36 7,409 4,3

28-Jan-05 12 12 12 12 48 66 0 0 8 8 8 8 32 44 7,522 4,2

29-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 48 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 44 7,628 4,3

30-Jan-05 12 0 12 0 60 66 0 0 8 0 8 0 40 44 7,641 4,3

31-Jan-05 0 0 0 0 60 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 44 7,739 4,3

Total 0 0 48 24 48 24 60 66 0 0 32 16 32 16 40 44 241,277 130,7

Banks Tracy
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Baseline water-quality samplingto infer nutrient and contaminant sources at Kaloko-Honokōhau NationalPark, Island of Hawaiʻi**
 
Report | Table3 | Table 4
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.42/4-4:2014-5158
Item Number:0624-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000942685
 
April 24, 2018
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.6

                             COMSHARE, INCORPORATED

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
constitutes and appoints Dennis G. Ganster, Kathryn A. Jehle and Michael S.
Khoury, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution, and resubstitution for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign a certain Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to be filed by Comshare, Incorporated relating to the Comshare,
Incorporated 1998 Global Employee Stock Option Plan and any and all amendments
thereto, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that such attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Dated: Dec 17, 1999                            /s/ Alan G. Merten
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Alan G. Merten, Director
### §290o–2. Applicability of certain provisions of Bretton Woods Agreements Act

Section 286b of this title shall apply to the Bank in the same manner in which such section applies to the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the International Monetary Fund.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title VII, §704], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–179.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Bretton Woods Agreements Act, referred to in section catchline, is act July 31, 1945, ch. 339, 59 Stat. 512, which is classified principally to subchapter XV (§286 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 286 of this title and Tables.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          36,487
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,758
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                33,405
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    322,412
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         104,680
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           104,440
<LOANS>                                        897,857
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,462,335
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,160,144
<SHORT-TERM>                                    59,840
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             13,627
<LONG-TERM>                                     98,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,778
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,462,335
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 37,172
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               11,741
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   758
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                49,671
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,393
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,278
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      850
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 23,068
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,970
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,970
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.17
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,751
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,504
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 19,364
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,817
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,206
<RECOVERIES>                                       996
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,457
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             9,136
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,321


</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4528 

To preempt State data security vulnerability mandates and decryption 

requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2016 

Mr. TED LIEU of California (for himself, Mr. FARENTHOLD, Ms. DELBENE, 

and Mr. BISHOP of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To preempt State data security vulnerability mandates and 

decryption requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring National 

5 Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommuni6 cations Act of 2016’’ or the ‘‘ENCRYPT Act of 2016’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4528 IH

1 SEC. 2. PREEMPTION OF STATE DATA SECURITY VULNER2 ABILITY MANDATES AND DECRYPTION RE3 QUIREMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—A State or political subdivision of 

5 a State may not— 

6 (1) mandate or request that a manufacturer, 

7 developer, seller, or provider of covered products or 

8 services— 

9 (A) design or alter the security functions 

10 in its product or service to allow the surveil11 lance of any user of such product or service, or 

12 to allow the physical search of such product, by 

13 any agency or instrumentality of a State, a po14 litical subdivision of a State, or the United 

15 States; or 

16 (B) have the ability to decrypt or otherwise 

17 render intelligible information that is encrypted 

18 or otherwise rendered unintelligible using its 

19 product or service; or 

20 (2) prohibit the manufacture, sale or lease, of21 fering for sale or lease, or provision to the general 

22 public of a covered product or service because such 

23 product or service uses encryption or a similar secu24 rity function. 

25 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4528 IH

1 (1) COVERED PRODUCT OR SERVICE.—The 

2 term ‘‘covered product or service’’ means any com3 puter hardware, computer software, electronic de4 vice, or online service that— 

5 (A) has traveled in interstate or foreign 

6 commerce or otherwise affects interstate or for7 eign commerce; and 

8 (B) is made available to the general public. 

9 (2) ONLINE SERVICE.—The term ‘‘online serv10 ice’’ means a service provided over the Internet that 

11 makes available to users— 

12 (A) the ability to send or receive commu13 nications, such as emails, text messages, 

14 photos, and audio and video communications; 

15 (B) the ability to share data files with 

16 other users; or 

17 (C) remote computer processing or storage. 

18 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

19 the several States, the District of Columbia, each 

20 commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United 

21 States, and each federally recognized Indian tribe. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40194

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERTO MALDONADO-CARMONA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:12-CR-806-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Roberto MaldonadoCarmona has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Maldonado-Carmona has not filed a response. We

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 25, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 13-40194 Document: 00512419854 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 13-40194

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40194 Document: 00512419854 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
§ 683.800 What actions of the Department may be appealed to the Office of Administrative Law Judges? ( a ) An applicant for financial assistance under title I of WIOA who is dissatisfied by a determination not to award Federal financial assistance, in whole or in part, to such applicant; or a recipient, subrecipient, or a contractor against which the Grant Officer has directly imposed a sanction or corrective action under sec. 184 of WIOA, including a sanction against a State under part 677 of this chapter, may appeal to the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ) within 21 days of receipt of the final determination.
( b ) Failure to request a hearing within 21 days of receipt of the final determination constitutes a waiver of the right to a hearing.
( c ) A request for a hearing under this subpart must specifically state those issues or findings in the final determination upon which review is requested. Issues or findings in the final determination not specified for review, or the entire final determination when no hearing has been requested within the 21 days, are considered resolved and not subject to further review. Only alleged violations of WIOA, its regulations, the grant or other agreement under WIOA raised in the final determination and the request for hearing are subject to review.
( d ) A request for a hearing must be filed with the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Department of Labor, in accordance with 29 CFR part 18, with one copy to the Departmental official who issued the determination.
( e ) The procedures in this subpart apply in the case of a complainant who has engaged in the alternative dispute resolution process set forth in § 683.840, if neither a settlement was reached nor a decision issued within the 60 days, except that the request for hearing before the OALJ must be filed within 15 days of the conclusion of the 60-day period provided in § 683.840. In addition to including the final determination upon which review is requested, the complainant must include a copy of any Stipulation of Facts and a brief summary of proceedings.
[81 FR 56410, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 1779, Jan. 11, 2021]
#### § 641.577 Is there a limit on community service assignment hours?

While there is no specific limit on the number of hours that may be worked in a community service assignment, a community service assignment must be a part-time position. However, the Department strongly encourages grantees to use 1,300 hours as a benchmark and good practice for monitoring community service hours.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWIN PASCUA CARAANG and

EDNA GOROSPE CARAANG,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

PNC MORTGAGE; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees,

 and

NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE; et al.,

 Defendants.

No. 11-17027

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00594-LEKBMK

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Leslie E. Kobayashi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2012** 

Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

FILED

SEP 21 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-17027

Edwin and Edna Caraang appeal the district court’s judgment dismissing

their action alleging federal and state law claims challenging a non-judicial

foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an

abuse of discretion a dismissal for failure to comply with a court order, Ferdik v.

Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir. 1992), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the Caraangs’

action after the Caraangs failed to comply, allegedly due to their counsel’s

calendaring errors, with an order requiring them to file an amended complaint or

face dismissal. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) (allowing dismissal of action for failure

to comply with court orders); Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1260-61 (listing factors to guide

dismissal under Rule 41(b)); see also Casey v. Albertson’s, Inc., 362 F.3d 1254,

1260 (9th Cir. 2004) (“parties are bound by the actions of their lawyers, and

alleged attorney malpractice does not usually provide a basis to set aside a

judgment”). Dismissal followed the court’s prior use of less drastic alternatives,

and, under the circumstances, served both the public’s interest in expeditiously

resolving litigation and the court’s interest in managing its docket. See Ferdik, 963

F.2d at 1262-63 (dismissal appropriate where three out of five factors support it).

Issues not supported by argument, including those concerning the merits of

prior rulings dismissing the Caraangs’s claims for failure to state a claim and
3 11-17027

striking their first amended complaint, are deemed abandoned. See Am. Int’l

Enters., Inc. v. FDIC, 3 F.3d 1263, 1266 n.5 (9th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe GEOS-iODAS: Description and EvaluationThis report documents the GMAO's Goddard Earth Observing System sea ice and ocean data assimilation systems (GEOS iODAS) and their evolution from the first reanalysis test, through the implementation that was used to initialize the GMAO decadal forecasts, and to the current system that is used to initialize the GMAO seasonal forecasts. The iODAS assimilates a wide range of observations into the ocean and sea ice components: in-situ temperature and salinity profiles, sea level anomalies from satellite altimetry, analyzed SST, and sea-ice concentration. The climatological sea surface salinity is used to constrain the surface salinity prior to the Argo years. Climatological temperature and salinity gridded data sets from the 2009 version of the World Ocean Atlas (WOA09) are used to help constrain the analysis in data sparse areas. The latest analysis, GEOS ODAS5.2, is diagnosed through detailed studies of the statistics of the innovations and analysis departures, comparisons with independent data, and integrated values such as volume transport. Finally, the climatologies of temperature and salinity fields from the Argo era, 2002-2011, are presented and compared with the WOA09.Document ID20140011278Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsVernieres, Guillaume*(Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Rienecker, Michele M.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Kovach, Robin*(Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Keppenne, Christian L.*(Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 2, 2014Publication DateDecember 1, 2012Subject CategoryGeosciences (General)Earth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2012-104606/VOL30GSFC-E-DAA-TN8300Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNG12HP06CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsClimateOcean Data AssimilationReanalysisAvailable DownloadsNameType20140011278.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Techprecision Corporation
(the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Louis A. Winoski,
the Interim Chief Executive Officer, and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      February 26, 2010
            /s/
      Louis A. WinoskiLouis
      A. WinoskiInterim
      Chief Executive OfficerDated:
      February 26, 2010
            /s/
      Richard F. FitzgeraldRichard
      F. FitzgeraldChief
      Financial Officer
§ 702.435 Effects of debarment. ( a ) The Director shall give notice of the debarment of a physician, hospital, or provider of medical support services or supplies to: ( 1 ) All OWCP district offices;
( 2 ) The Health Care Financing Administration;
( 3 ) The State or Local authority responsible for licensing or certifying the debarred party;
( 4 ) The employers and authorized insurers under the Act by means of an annual bulletin sent to them by the Director; and
( 5 ) The general public by posting in the district office in the jurisdiction where the debarred party maintains a place of business. If a claims representative is debarred, the Director shall give notice to those groups listed in paragraphs (a) (1), (3), (4), and (5) of this section.
( b ) Notwithstanding any debarment under this subpart, the Director shall not refuse a claimant reimbursement for any otherwise reimbursable medical expense if the treatment, service or supply was rendered by debarred provider in an emergency situation. However, such claimant will be directed by the Director to select a duly qualified provider upon the earliest opportunity.
[50 FR 405, Jan. 3, 1985]