alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Delegation of Functions and Authority Under Sections 315 and 325 of Title 32, United States Code

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby delegate to you: (a) the functions and authority of the President contained in section 315 of title 32, United States Code, to permit a commissioned officer of the Regular Army or Regular Air Force to accept a commission in the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard, as the case may be, terminable at your discretion, without prejudicing his or her rank and without vacating his or her regular appointment; and (b) the functions and authority of the President contained in section 325 of title 32, United States Code, to authorize the service of an officer of the Army National Guard or the Air National Guard on active duty without relieving that officer from duty in the National Guard of his or her State, or of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, or the United States Virgin Islands, or the District of Columbia and to give such authorization in advance for the purpose of establishing the succession of command of a unit. 

This delegation of functions and authority supersedes and replaces the July 23, 2004, delegation to the Secretary of Defense of the functions and authority of the President contained in section 325 of title 32, United States Code.

                    You are further authorized and directed to make necessary arrangements to fund the exercise of these functions and authority from the proper appropriation, prescribe regulations to implement these functions and authority, and to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register*.                 

[FR Doc. 2011-9729

Billing code 5000-04-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 98

 113

 114

 88

 106

 96

 98

 125

 109

 91

 95

 88

 115

 119

 100

 90

 102

 92

 116

 98

 99

 89

 116

 115

 105

 116

 120

 113

 104

 110

 78

 81

 83

 83

 83

 81

 80

 76

 82

 80

 82

 81

 80

 81

 76

 82

 83

 83

 83

 81

 81

 82

 81

 82

 85

 87

 86

 81

 81

 80

 83

 85

 87

 85

 88

 83

 84

 82

 85

 83

 85

 84

 85

 85

 82

 84

 86

 85

 89

 85

 86

 87

 87

 86

 89

 90

 92

 87

 86

 87

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 8, 2003

HIGH LOW MEAN

 75.2

 75.6

 76.5

 76.3

 75.2

 73.9

 72.3

 72.0

 69.8

 71.2

 71.4

 72.6

 72.6

 72.6

 71.6

 70.7

 69.9

 69.3

 71.4

 73.1

 80.8

 80.5

 71.4

 70.2

 69.7

 69.7

 70.2

 70.1

 69.8

 69.6

 69.8

 70.7

 71.8

 72.0

 70.9

 69.3

 68.3

 68.1

 67.1

 66.9

 66.7

 67.6

 68.2

 68.1

 67.9

 66.7

 66.0

 64.7

 65.1

 67.7

 66.9

 68.5

 67.2

 66.8

 65.6

 65.7

 65.8

 65.9

 65.8

 65.7

 72.5

 73.2

 74.2

 74.4

 73.1

 71.7

 70.5

 70.1

 68.7

 68.9

 69.9

 70.2

 70.7

 70.5

 69.7

 69.1

 68.1

 67.2

 67.9

 70.5

 72.7

 74.3

 69.4

 68.7

 67.9

 67.8

 68.0

 68.1

 67.9

 67.7

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.6

 8.4

 8.1

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.9

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 8.5

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 8.6

 8.5

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.4

 8.1

 8.0

 8.4

 7.7

 7.4

 7.2

 7.1

 7.5

 7.6

 7.6

 7.6

 7.5

 7.5

 8.4

 8.2

 8.0

 7.9

 8.0

 8.0

 7.6

 8.0

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 8.3

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 7.9

 7.6

 7.6

 7.5

 8.0

 7.8

 7.6

 7.6

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.9

 7.8

 7.8

 8.7

 8.4

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.3

 8.1

 8.2

 0.0

 0.0

 0.0

 8.5

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.2

 7.8

 7.8

 7.8

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 532.40

 531.80

 532.00

 531.90

 531.29

 531.32

 531.11

 530.32

 529.52

 528.83

 528.35

 527.63

 527.17

 526.30

 525.60

 525.00

 524.50

 523.97

 523.00

 521.99

 520.74

 520.59

 520.08

 519.45

 519.28

 518.56

 518.04

 517.70

 517.30

 516.10

 1,894,710

 1,887,268

 1,889,748

 1,888,508

 1,880,951

 1,881,323

 1,878,724

 1,868,957

 1,859,085

 1,850,585

 1,844,679

 1,835,834

 1,830,190

 1,819,533

 1,810,974

 1,803,648

 1,797,552

 1,791,097

 1,779,305

 1,767,055

 1,751,935

 1,750,123

 1,743,969

 1,736,378

 1,734,331

 1,725,672

 1,719,428

 1,715,350

 1,710,556

 1,696,202

STORAGE

-2,482

-7,442

+2,480

-1,240

-7,557

+372

-2,599

-9,767

-9,872

-8,500

-5,906

-8,845

-5,644

-10,657

-8,559

-7,326

-6,096

-6,455

-11,792

-12,250

-15,120

-1,812

-6,154

-7,591

-2,047

-8,659

-6,244

-4,078

-4,794

-14,354

CHANGE

1,359

1,122

2,296

0

675

4,337

3,072

0

0

915

1,073

457

2,085

810

1,030

1,966

1,761

1,440

1,031

768

0

1,085

1,284

1,888

2,093

1,723

1,991

2,830

2,304

0

PUMPING

 2,047

 4,445

 863

 0

 3,918

 2,899

 4,091

 5,081

 4,846

 4,914

 3,734

 4,892

 4,730

 6,480

 4,727

 5,734

 4,882

 4,220

 6,554

 6,864

 7,992

 1,838

 3,502

 5,240

 2,659

 6,052

 4,853

 3,786

 4,626

 7,549

POWER

 113

 109

 105

 86

 103

 110

 109

 111

 108

 105

 74

 102

 110

 111

 107

 103

 110

 90

 145

 161

 174

 193

 213

 215

 203

 202

 202

 202

 151

 99

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-450

-320

-78

-539

-463

-1,140

-183

+269

-22

-181

-243

+78

-91

+408

-511

+178

+158

-384

-278

+81

+543

+32

-671

-260

-264

+166

-85

-898

+56

+411

OR

 188

 217

 132

 269

 216

 228

 268

 239

 239

 179

 159

 199

 119

 178

 190

 189

 355

 296

 279

 161

 235

 262

 281

 292

 268

 284

 291

 272

 244

 243

C.F.S.

 .47

 .54

 .33

 .67

 .54

 .57

 .67

 .60

 .60

 .45

 .40

 .50

 .30

 .45

 .48

 .48

 .90

 .75

 .71

 .41

 .60

 .67

 .72

 .75

 .69

 .73

 .75

 .70

 .63

 .63

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR August 15, 2006

DAILY OPERATIONS

JUNE 2006 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS -200,990 41,395 134,018 4,026 0 -4,681 6,972 17.69 .00

ACRE-FEET -200,990 82,107 265,825 7,986 0 -9,285 13,829

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 265,825

PACHECO TUNNEL 7,986 TOTAL 273,811

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2005 TO DATE = 11.53

 1,897,192

SPILL 0 .00

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

Table 17
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNASA Standing Review Board HandbookNo abstract availableDocument ID20140008530Acquisition SourceHeadquartersDocument TypeSpecial Publication (SP)AuthorsAmer, Tahani R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Ortiz, James N.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Calloway, Michelle A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Greathouse, Richard M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Polen, Charles A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Baker, Ronald L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Borchardt, Heidemarie E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Chromik, Christopher C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Moran, Erin*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Paraska, Michael W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Moore, Deborah A.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Chung, Simon*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredJune 27, 2014Publication DateApril 7, 2014Subject CategoryAdministration And ManagementDocumentation And Information ScienceReport/Patent NumberNASA/SP-2014-3706/REVADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20140008530.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20170000280See AlsoNASA Standing Review Board Handbook: Revision Bvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
MEMBER INTEREST PURCHASE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2  This AMENDMENT NO. 2 dated November 18, 2011 is to that certain MEMBER INTEREST PURCHASE AGREEMENT made as of October 1, 2011, as previously amended, by and between Ty Miller, Levi Miller, and Eric Jessen ("Sellers") of membership interests of Miller Fabrication, L.L.C., a Wyoming limited liability company ("Miller, or the Company"), and High Plains Gas, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("Buyer").  1. Conflict.In the event there is a conflict between the terms of the original Member Interest Purchase Agreement, the terms of this Amendment shall control any interpretation. Unless this Amendment expressly amends or supplements the language of the Member Interest Purchase Agreement, the original terms of the Member Interest Purchase Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Unless otherwise defined in this Amendment, terms defined in the Lease Agreement shall be similarly defined herein.   2. Section 2.2 (a) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:  (a)     In consideration of Seller's sale, conveyance, transfer, delivery and assignment to Buyer of the Seller Member Interest, Buyer shall, no later than December 31, 2011, pay to Sellers the sum of Eight Hundred Forty Five Thousand ($845,000) in cash by immediately available funds (the "Initial Cash Consideration").  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party hereto has caused this Purchase Agreement to be executed in its name by a duly authorized officer as of the day and year first above written.  HIGH PLAINS GAS, INC.By:\s\ Brandon W. HargettBrandon W. Hargett, Chief Executive OfficerMiller Fabrication LLCBy:\s\ Ty MillerTy Miller, Managing MemberMiller PrincipalsBy:\s\ Ty MillerTy Miller, As IndividualsBy:\s\ Levi MillerLevi Miller, As IndividualsBy:\s\ Eric JessenEric Jessen, As Individuals
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SASHA BOWEN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 2312

[ April 8, 2021 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marina Garcia

- Wood

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 08

- 10785CF10A.

Sasha Bowen

, Miami , pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, K UNTZ and A RTAU

, JJ. , concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search USGS
-     - USGS Publications Warehouse
  - Contact
  - 							   Explore recent     publications by USGS Authors						    
  - 							   Browse all of Pubs     Warehouse by Publication type and year						    
  - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - 							       Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series 
- USGS Publications   Warehouse
- Explore    - 							   Explore recent     publications by USGS Authors						    
  - 							   Browse all of Pubs     Warehouse by Publication type and year 
- Documentation    - FAQS
  - Web     Service Documentation
  - Other     Resources
  - 							       Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series 
- Contact
Search:					    				    			                                             Water resources of the Mississippi embayment; Low-flow characteristics of streams in the Mississippi embayment in Mississippi and Alabama, with a section on quality of the waterProfessional Paper 448-I- By:
- P.R.   Speer,                           H.G. Golden,                           J.F. Patterson,                             W.J.   Welborne,                          and and others                         
TweetLinks- Document:  Document                                  (pdf)
- Plates:
Plate 1                                    (pdf)
Plate 2                                    (pdf)
Plate 3                                    (pdf)

- Paper   version: In   stock and available from the  USGS Store
- Download citation as:   RIS
AbstractAdditional publication details- Publication type:
- Report
- Publication Subtype:
- USGS Numbered Series
- Title:
- Water resources of the Mississippi embayment; Low-flow characteristics of   streams in the Mississippi embayment in Mississippi and Alabama, with a   section on quality of the water
- Series title:
- Professional Paper
- Series number:
- 448
- Chapter:
- I
- Edition:
- -
- Year Published:
- 1964
- Language:
- ENGLISH
- Description:
- p. I1-I47
- Larger Work Type:
- Report
- Larger Work Subtype:
- USGS Numbered Series
- Larger Work Title:
- Water resources of the Mississippi embayment

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found here.

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacy					   Policies and Notices				    

					   U.S. Department of the Interior				    				    | 				    U.S. Geological Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp448I                    				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 2012 00:09:25
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph Simmons, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Ho opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §290g–10. Additional authorization for contribution to African Development Fund

#### (a) Payment of United States contribution; review of payment and voting structure with other donor nations

The United States Governor is authorized to contribute on behalf of the United States $50,000,000 to the African Development Fund, which would represent an additional United States contribution to the first replenishment. The Secretary of the Treasury is directed to begin discussions with other donor nations to the African Development Fund for the purpose of setting amounts and of reviewing and possibly changing the voting structure within the Fund: Provided, however, That any commitment to make such contribution shall be made subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

In order to pay for the United States contribution to the African Development Fund provided for in this section there are authorized to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation $50,000,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 94–302, title II, §211, formerly §212, as added Pub. L. 95–118, title VI, §601, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1069; renumbered §211, Pub. L. 96–259, title III, §301(1), June 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 430.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 211 of Pub. L. 94–302 was classified to section 290g–9 of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–118, title VII, §702, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1070.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 3, 1977, except that no funds authorized to be appropriated by this section may be available for use or obligation prior to Oct. 1, 1977, see section 1001 of Pub. L. 95–118, set out as a note under section 282i of this title.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20178 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JASON MICHAEL CARPENTER Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:03-CR-90-1 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Jason Michael Carpenter has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Carpenter has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32b LNB Bancorp, Inc. Exhibit to Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 (For the three months ended March 31, 2004) Exhibit Number (32(b)) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
Corporation) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Terry M. White, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate
Secretary of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Terry M. White Terry M. White
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary
May 11, 2004
#### Respondent.

Appeal by the administratrix of the estate of Cosmos Caloro from a verdict of no cause of action in a death case, and from an order denying a new trial. Appeal by the defendant from a verdict of $10,000 in favor of the infant plaintiff Donald Caloro, and from an order denying a new trial. Both cases were tried before a jury at a term of the Supreme Court for Rensselaer County. The accident, out of which the eases arose, happened on a State highway, known as Route 9, between the city of Albany and the hamlet of East Greenbush. The jury apparently found that the decedent and the infant plaintiff, who were father and son, were walking in the direction of traffic, This was in violation of the statutory rule that pedestrians should walk facing traffic (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 85, subd. 6). The trial court submitted to the jury the question of whether the decedent’s violation of the statutory rule amounted to contributory negligence as a matter of fact. This was proper *(Tedia*v. *Ellman,*280 27. Y. 124). As to the infant plaintiff the trial court charged that he was obliged to exercise only that degree of care that a boy of his age would ordinarily exercise under the circumstances. This was also proper *(Locklin*v. *Fisher,*264 App. Div. 452). There was evidence from which the jury could find that the defendant was negligent. Judgments and orders affirmed, in the death case with no costs, and in the infant’s ease, with costs to respondent. Hill, P. J., Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., concurs in the infant’s case, and dissents in the action brought by the administratrix upon the ground that the finding, implicit in the no cause verdict, that deceased was guilty of contributory negligence, is against the weight of evidence; Deyo, J., concurs for affirmance in the death action but dissents in the infant’s action on the ground that the Trial Judge charged that the statute (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 85, subd. 6) requiring pedestrians to walk on the left side of the highway facing traffic did not apply because of the child’s age, or in other words, that he was *non sui juris*so far as the statute was concerned. An infant is *non sui juris*only up to the age of three or four years *(Verni*v. *Johnson,*295 N. Y. 436). After that he becomes *sui juris*and whether or not his conduct constitutes negligence becomes a question of fact to be determined by the jury in the light of what would be considered reasonable or prudent in the case of a child of the same age, capacity and experience under similar circumstances *(Gloshinsky*v. *Bergen Milk Transportation Co.,*279 N. Y. 54; *Camardo*v. *New York State Railways,*247 N. Y. 111). In the instant case the boy was eight years old, and his violation of the statute, although not constituting contributory negligence as a matter of law *(Tedia*v. *Ellman,*280 N. Y. 124), was evidence of negligence which the jury had a right to consider, bearing in mind his age, intelligence *928and experience *(Locklin*v. *Fisher,*264 App. Div. 452). The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
(No. 5862

#### Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 3, 1972.*

Garfield Park Moving and Storage Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
### §5721. Continued application of United States law

#### (a) In general

Notwithstanding any change in the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong, the laws of the United States shall continue to apply with respect to Hong Kong, on and after July 1, 1997, in the same manner as the laws of the United States were applied with respect to Hong Kong before such date unless otherwise expressly provided by law or by Executive order under section 5722 of this title.

#### (b) International agreements

For all purposes, including actions in any court in the United States, the Congress approves the continuation in force on and after July 1, 1997, of all treaties and other international agreements, including multilateral conventions, entered into before November 27, 2019, between the United States and Hong Kong, or entered into before November 27, 2019, between the United States and the United Kingdom and applied to Hong Kong, unless or until terminated in accordance with law. If in carrying out this subchapter, the President determines that Hong Kong is not legally competent to carry out its obligations under any such treaty or other international agreement, or that the continuation of Hong Kong's obligations or rights under any such treaty or other international agreement is not appropriate under the circumstances, such determination shall be reported to the Congress in accordance with section 5731 of this title.

(Pub. L. 102–383, title II, §201, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1452; Pub. L. 116–76, §4(a)(1), Nov. 27, 2019, 133 Stat. 1163.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 116–76 substituted "November 27, 2019" for "such date" in two places.