alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 716.34

 714.87

 713.27

 711.43

 708.93

 707.83

 709.94

 711.07

 712.04

 712.92

 713.69

 714.39

 715.08

 715.84

 716.43

 716.52

 716.35

 716.35

 718.30

 720.73

 721.55

 722.01

 722.32

 722.41

 722.48

 722.48

 722.43

 722.34

 722.20

 722.04

 1,059

 1,011

 960

 904

 831

 800

 859

 893

 922

 949

 973

 995

 1,018

 1,043

 1,062

 1,065

 1,060

 1,060

 1,126

 1,212

 1,242

 1,259

 1,271

 1,274

 1,277

 1,277

 1,275

 1,272

 1,266

 1,260

STORAGE

-44

-48

-51

-56

-73

-31

+59

+34

+29

+27

+24

+22

+23

+25

+19

+3

-5

+0

+66

+86

+30

+17

+12

+3

+3

+0

-2

-3

-6

-6

CHANGE

8

6

4

2

-7

1

30

17

15

14

12

11

12

13

10

8

7

10

43

53

25

20

17

13

14

12

11

10

7

7

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 30

 30

 30

 30

 30

 17

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 6

 10

 10

 10

 10

 10

 11

 11

 11

 12

 12

 12

 12

 10

 10

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2004 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 20, 2004

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +157 405 0 324

ACRE-FEET +157 803 0 643

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 643

 643

 1,103

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L

Table 7
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 876

 914

 1,037

 839

 970

 862

 637

 591

 532

 551

 509

 475

 530

 554

 641

 647

 637

 554

 404

 415

 414

 458

 467

 456

 459

 486

 485

 597

 571

 528

 528

 188

 183

 196

 180

 181

 186

 204

 199

 182

 263

 180

 216

 184

 203

 183

 191

 181

 176

 163

 175

 167

 175

 215

 188

 241

 254

 249

 230

 236

 264

 213

 465

 482

 502

 486

 454

 434

 405

 389

 380

 391

 360

 349

 344

 366

 379

 403

 400

 364

 310

 322

 338

 340

 362

 356

 378

 390

 382

 414

 417

 428

 423

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2015 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 2, 2015

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
(No. 00016

#### Nancy E. Wheeler, as widow and beneficiary of Frederick Leland Wheeler, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed November 13, 1973.*

Nancy E. Wheeler, Claimant, by Thomas Carmody, her attorney.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, and Vincent Biskupic, Special Assistant Attorney, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

This action is brought by Nancy E. Wheeler, as widow and designated beneficiary of Frederick Leland Wheeler, deceased, pursuant to the "Law Enforcement *532Officers and Firemen Compensation Act”, [hereafter, "the Act”] *Ch. 48, Sec. 281, et. seq., Ill.Rev.Stat., 1971.*

Claimant filed an application for benefits, narrative report prepared by her attorney, and coroner’s certificate of death. The Attorney General’s office investigated the claim, pursuant to Section 4 of the Act, received investigative reports from the Illinois State Police, and Edwardsville Police Department, and recommended that the case be set for hearing. The court, sitting *en banc,*heard the case on May 8, 1973.

The relevant facts, briefly, are as follows: the decedent, was a corporal employed by the Illinois State Police. He began his duties with the Illinois State Police at 8:00 a.m. on November 15, 1971. His activities on said date included a search for a stolen vehicle in East St. Louis, Illinois, a trip to the place of a homicide in Washington Park, Illinois, a drive to Maryville, Illinois, District 11 Headquarters, and a trip to Edwardsville, Illinois. He arrived at Edwardsville, at approximately 6:25 p.m. It is here that his duties as a state policeman ended, according to the testimony elicited from Corporal Wheeler’s supervisors. Thereafter, his activities were of a social, personal nature. At approximately 11:00 p.m., the application recites that his death occurred when his service pistol discharged, as it was being transferred, apparently from one hand to another in his car.

The dispositive issue for the Court’s determination is whether Corporal Wheeler was on duty at the time of his death at 11:00 p.m.

The Court finds from the testimony and evidence presented that Corporal Wheeler was not on duty at the time of his death and therefore, denies the claim presented herein.
(No. 74-CC-427

#### Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 8, 1974.*

Desaulniers and Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 687.130 When must applications for National Dislocated Worker Grants be submitted to the Department? ( a ) Applications for Employment Recovery DWGs may be submitted at any time during the year and must be submitted to respond to eligible events as soon as possible when: ( 1 ) The applicant receives a notification of a mass layoff or a closure as a result of a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice, a general announcement, or some other means, or in the case of applications to address situations described in § 687.110(a)(4), when higher-than-average demand for employment and training activities for those members of the Armed Forces and military spouses exceeds State and local resources for providing such activities;
( 2 ) Worker need and interest in services has been determined through Rapid Response, or other means, and is sufficient to justify the need for a DWG; and
( 3 ) A determination has been made, in collaboration with the applicable local area, that State and local formula funds are inadequate to provide the level of services needed by the affected workers.
( b ) Applications for Disaster Recovery DWGs to respond to an emergency or major disaster must be submitted as soon as possible when: ( 1 ) As described in § 687.110(b)(1), FEMA has declared that the affected area is eligible for public assistance;
( 2 ) A situation as described in § 687.110(b)(2) occurs. The applications must indicate the applicable Federal agency declaration, describe the impact on the local and/or State economy, and describe the proposed activities; or
( 3 ) A situation as described in § 687.110(b)(3) occurs, and interest in services has been determined and is sufficient to justify the need for a DWG.
### Part 5—Public Property
### §3510. Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out this chapter, in addition to funds otherwise available for such purpose, $12,000,000 for the fiscal year 1981. Funds appropriated under this section are authorized to remain available until expended.

(Pub. L. 96–53, title IV, §410, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 376; amended Pub. L. 96–533, title III, §312, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3148.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title IV of Pub. L. 96–53, Aug. 14, 1979, 93 Stat. 371, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of title IV to the Code, see Tables.

#### Amendments

1980—Pub. L. 96–533 substituted appropriations authorization of $12,000,000 for fiscal year 1981 for such authorization of $23,750,000 for fiscal year 1980.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1979, see section 512(a) of Pub. L. 96–53, set out as an Effective Date of 1979 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
#### Jean F. Eisenberg et al., Appellants, v. Charlotta F. Palmer et al., as Executrices of Elizabeth Fischer, Deceased, Respondents.

Ro opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
§ 686.965 How does Job Corps ensure that complaints or disputes are resolved in a timely fashion? ( a ) If a complaint is not resolved by the center operator or service provider in the time frames described in § 686.960, the person making the complaint may request that the Regional Director determine whether reasonable cause exists to believe that WIOA or regulations for this part of WIOA have been violated. The request must be filed with the Regional Director within 60 days from the date that the center operator or service provider should have issued the decision.
( b ) Following the receipt of a request for review under paragraph (a) of this section, the Regional Director must determine within 60 days whether there has been a violation of WIOA or the WIOA regulations. If the Regional Director determines that there has been a violation of WIOA or WIOA regulations, (s)he may direct the operator or service provider to remedy the violation or direct the service provider to issue a decision to resolve the dispute according to the service provider's grievance procedures. If the service provider does not comply with the Regional Director's decision within 30 days, the Regional Director may impose a sanction on the center operator or service provider for violating WIOA or WIOA regulations, and/or for failing to issue a decision. Decisions imposing sanctions upon a center operator or service provider may be appealed to the Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges under § 683.800 or § 683.840 of this chapter.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of NewPage Holding Corporation and NewPage Corporation (the
Companies) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Prystash, Chief Financial Officer of the Companies,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Companies.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ David J. Prystash  
|David J. Prystash      
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 2, 2009
### §299. Short title

This chapter may be cited as the "Foreign Service Buildings Act, 1926."

(May 7, 1926, ch. 250, §8, 44 Stat. 405.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0033]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of March 2, 2011 (76 FR 11490), providing notice of the voluntary withdrawal of approval of eight new animal drug applications (NADAs). That document contained an error in the preamble. FDA is correcting the name and address for the sponsor of five of the NADAs. This correction is being made to improve the accuracy of the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        George K. Haibel, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-6), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240-276-9019, e-mail:                         *george.haibel@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 2, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-4545, on page 11490, in the first column, correct the Truow Nutrition, Inc., name and address to read: Trouw Nutrition USA LLC, P.O. Box 219, 115 Executive Dr., Highland, IL 62249.                

Dated: April 15, 2011.

Bernadette Dunham,

Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.

[FR Doc. 2011-9778 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
§ 618.705 Definitions. ( a ) For purposes of TRA, an AAW is “participating in approved training” if: ( 1 ) The worker is either attending and taking part in all scheduled classes, required activities, and required events in a given week, or the training provider has excused the worker's absence or failure to take part in accordance with its written policies.
( 2 ) In the case of distance learning, the worker is either meeting all the requirements of the training provider in a given week in accordance with its rules, regulations, and standards, or the training provider has excused the worker's failure to meet those requirements in accordance with its written policies.
( b ) For purposes of TRA, the term “training allowance” means any assistance or payment, excluding Federal student financial assistance, that can be used for the same purpose as funds for the costs of training covered by the TAA Program, and that is given or paid directly to the AAW.
( c ) For purposes of TRA, the term “adversely affected employment” includes employment at a successor-in-interest, and such wages reported to the State or received by an AAW from a successor-in-interest are included as wages under § 618.720(c).
# Cit p o

f llUisicl e ^Iioal ^
DAV. , H ^ 8R*DF0R D Februar y 22,201 2 ''°"''S,f„TM' S JEPR'" ' K> J OH T ALLE N NOLE S .JG E F A M PI N T O L - L L R *•

/ i r' : L.\': > L i R E R S 4 p^ ^ ^ ^A^' I ]____ , 5 RICK Y WIUJAM S Mr . Denni s DeVany Chief , EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Department

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 - J t' C ,'-1- 1 C O

. J. - 

## u -J^ J

•-j j RE : Northwes t

Alabam aRegiona

l Airpor t (MSL ) Docket DOT-OST-2008-020 9 Mr . DeVany : We hav e reviewe dth e EA S proposal s submitte d under Docke t DOT-OST-2008-020 , an d hav e determine dtha

t th e curren t

bid s d o no t

meet th e DOT' s statutor

y requirements . Th e propose dleve l o f

servic e wil l b e a

t agrea t disadvantag e fo

r any airline , an d th e Northwes t Alabam aRegiona

l Airpor t (MSL ) withou t

accompanyin g suppor

t fro mDelt aAirlines . If

Delt a Airline s ca

n provid e some for

mo f codeshare and join t

ticke t pricing , thi s wil l allo w our passenger s t o easil y flo w throug h th e nationa l airport s system . W e appreciate th e interes t

o f thes e airline s i n our

Airport , bu t

d o no t endors e o r

suppor t thes e proposal s fo

r subsidize dessential air

servic e to th e communit

y o f Muscl e Shoals , Alabama . We reques t

that th e hold-i n order

tha t prohibite d Mesab a& Pinnacl e Airline s db aDelt a Connectio n fromterminatin g schedule d airlin e servic e t o Muscl e Shoals , Alabam aremai n i n effect unti l furthe

r notice , or

unti l suc h tim e a s asuitabl e replacemen t whic h satisfie s th e community' s need s ca

n b e found . We woul dlike t o thank

yo u i n advanc e fo

r your cooperatio n an d assistanc e i n thi s matter . Respectfully , Davi d H . Bradf^ d Mayor Cc : Northwes

t Alabam aRegiona l Airpor t Authorit y Barr y Griffith , A.A.E. , Manager/Airpor t Directo r
P'.JS T OFFIC E BO X 2-32 4 • MUSCL E SHOALS , ALABAM A :i5t;6 2 • (256 ) 383-t67 5 • FA X (256 ) 385-920 1
### §3644. Compensation of individuals in uniformed services

#### (a) Individual serving in a position in Commission

Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, any individual who is serving in a position in the Commission and who is a member of a uniformed service shall continue to be paid basic pay by such uniformed service and shall not be paid by the Commission for the period of the service in the uniformed service involved.

#### (b) Individual appointed as Administrator, Deputy Administrator, or Chief Engineer

If the individual appointed as Administrator, Deputy Administrator, or Chief Engineer of the Commission is a member of a uniformed service, the amount of basic pay otherwise payable to the individual for service in that position shall be reduced, up to the amount of that basic pay, by the amount of the basic pay payable to the individual as a member of a uniformed service.

#### (c) Reimbursement to uniformed service

The Commission shall annually pay to each uniformed service amounts sufficient to reimburse that uniformed service for any basic pay paid by that uniformed service to any member of that service during any period of service in the Commission by the member.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1204, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 461.)
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-063;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
[No. 8402.

Department Two.

January 14, 1910.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Charles Gunderson, *Appellant.*
      *1*

Burglary — Entry—Time—Evidence—Sufficiency. The evidence is insufficient to warrant a conviction for entering a ship in the nighttime with intent to commit a misdemeanor, where no breaking was alleged and it devolved upon the state to prove entry in the nighttime, and from the evidence the property was not missed until more than two hours after daylight.

Evidence — Judicial Notice. The courts take judicial notice that in this latitude in August it is daylight in the morning at 5:30-o’clock.

*673Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Jefferson county, Still, J., entered October 24, 1908, upon a trial and conviction of burglary.

Reversed.

*Allan Trumbull,*for appellant.

*Jas. W. B. Scott*and *U. D. Gnagey,*for respondent.

Reported in 106 Pac. 194.

Croav, J.

The defendant Charles Gunderson, having been adjudged guilty of burglary, has appealed to this court.

The information which was filed against the appellant and one Fred Hansen, under Bal. Code, § 7104, charges:

“That the said Fred Hansen and Charles Gunderson, then and there being, did on August 11th, 1908, *m the nighttime,*in Jefferson county, Washington, unlawfully and burglariously enter the ship Robert R. Hind, with intent then and there to commit a misdemeanor or felony, . . ..”

Appellant has made several assignments of error, but we only find it necessary to consider his contention that his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal should have been sustained. He was charged with entering the ship in the nighttime. No breaking was alleged. It therefore devolved upon the state to show by competent evidence that the alleged entry did occur in the nighttime. The ship was in the sole charge of one John E. Nelson, its master. He testified that certain property had been taken therefrom; that on August 11, he had been ashore from early morning until late in the evening, when he returned to the ship; that he got up about seven-thirty o’clock the next morning to take in the side lights; and that he then found some one had taken the property from the ship. He did not testify that he missed the property, or that he knew it had been taken at any prior time. He was the only person on the ship and the only one who testified to the fact of its having been entered or that the property had been taken. Judicial notice will be taken of the fact that in this latitude during the month of August, it is daylight in the morning for more than two hours before *674seven-thirty. There is nothing to show that the entry may not have been made, and the property taken, within those two hours, or during the daytime. The jury were not warranted in finding that the entry had been made in the nighttime.

The appellant’s motion for a directed verdict should have been sustained. The judgment is reversed, and the case remanded with instructions to dismiss the action and discharge the appellant.

Rudkin, C. J., Mount, Parked., and Dunbar, JJ., concur.