alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4217 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to determine eligibility for 

health insurance subsidies without regard to amounts included in income 

by reason of conversion to a Roth IRA. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 10, 2015 

Mr. BERA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to determine 

eligibility for health insurance subsidies without regard 

to amounts included in income by reason of conversion 

to a Roth IRA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH INSURANCE SUB4 SIDIES DETERMINED WITHOUT REGARD TO 

5 AMOUNTS INCLUDED IN INCOME BY REASON 

6 OF CONVERSION TO ROTH IRA. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 36B(d)(2)(B) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4217 IH

1 (1) by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) as 

2 subclauses (I), (II), and (III), respectively, and by 

3 adjusting the indentation of such subclauses accord4 ingly, 

5 (2) by striking ‘‘adjusted gross income in6 creased by—’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted gross in7 come— 

8 ‘‘(i) increased by—’’, 

9 (3) by striking the period at the end and insert10 ing ‘‘, and’’, and 

11 (4) by adding at the end the following new 

12 clause: 

13 ‘‘(ii) decreased by any amount in14 cluded in gross income to which section 

15 408A(d)(3)(A)(i) applies.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Stephen J. Burns *et al. v.*William Mays *et al.*

*Contract—sale of corn.*If a party buys corn under an agreement that, if it does not prove to be of grade No. 2 in the place to which it is to be shipped, the title is not to pass, but it shall be subject to the disposal of the vendor, and such purchaser, through his agent, sells the same after it is inspected and rejected as No. 2, he will be liable for the price received by him, to the vendor.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Edgar county; the Hon. Oliver L. Davis, Judge, presiding.

Messrs. Eads, Sellars & Dole, for the appellants.

Messrs. Bishop & McKinlay, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was *assumpsit,*in the county court of Edgar county, by William Mays and William J. Culbertson, plaintiffs, and against Stephen J. Burns and William J. Hunter, defendants, to recover the value of two car loads of corn alleged to have been sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendants at a stipulated price per bushel. There was a judgment for defendants in the county court, and an appeal taken to the circuit court, and there tried by a jury, who rendered a' verdict for the *234plaintiffs for four hundred eighty-three dollars and ninety-nine cents. A motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment. rendered on the verdict,- to reverse which defendants appeal.

It is claimed by appellants that, to complete the alleged sale to them of this corn, it was a part of the contract, and an essential part, that the corn should pass inspection at Indianapolis as No. 2 grade. In case it did so pass, then sixty-eight cents per bushel was to be paid for it. It was shipped to Indianapolis as per order of appellants, and was there rejected, and there sold by the agent of appellants for sixty-six cents per bushel, netting the sum of four hundred eighty-three dollars and ninety-nine cents, the precise amount found by the jury.

It is very clear, from the record, the appellants have received and disposed of property of appellees, of the value found by the jury, and there can be no reason urged why they should not pay for it. Admitting the contract was, the corn should pass inspection as No. 2 corn, otherwise it should be placed at the disposal of appellees, to be sold by them,—which is the substance of McMurchy’s testimony,—the corn was not so placed, but sold and disposed of by appellants. The right of appellees to recover sixty-six cents per bushel, the price for which it sold, is undeniable, and the verdict of the jury is right, and fully supported by the testimony, and the judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 11


                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

              For the Three Month Period Ended March 31,
                             2002 and 2001

(Dollars in Thousands)
                                                2002          2001

                                          <c>           <c>
Primary
  Net Income                                 $          1,672       $           1,203
  Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding                     2,833,727               2,833,727
    Adjustments - increases or
      decreases                                          None                    None
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      as adjusted                                   2,833,727               2,833,727

    Primary earnings per common
      share                                  $     .59     $     .42


Assuming full dilution
  Net Income                                 $          1,672       $           1,203
  Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding                     2,833,727               2,833,727
    Adjustments - increases or
      decreases                                          None                    None
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      as adjusted                                   2,833,727               2,833,727

    Earnings per common share                $     .59     $     .42
      assuming full dilution


</TABLE>

                                19
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsData Analysis of a Space Experiment: Common Software Tackles Uncommon TaskPresented here are the software adaptations developed by laboratory scientists to process the space experiment data products from three experiments on two International Microgravity Laboratory Missions (IML-1 and IML-2). The challenge was to accommodate interacting with many types of hardware and software developed by both European Space Agency (ESA) and NASA aerospace contractors, where data formats were neither commercial nor familiar to scientists. Some of the data had been corrupted by bit shifting of byte boundaries. Least-significant/most-significant byte swapping also occurred as might be expected for the various hardware platforms involved. The data consisted of 20 GBytes per experiment of both numerical and image data. A significant percentage of the bytes were consumed in NASA formatting with extra layers of packetizing structure. It was provided in various pieces to the scientists on magnetic tapes, Syquest cartridges, DAT tapes, CD-ROMS, analog video tapes, and by network FIP. In this paper I will provide some science background and present the software processing used to make the data useful in the months after the missions.Document ID19980169297Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWilkinson, R. Allen*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1998Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107520NASA-TM-107520E-10826Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 962-24-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980169297.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 320.30 Decision or report of hearings officer.

As soon as practicable after the completion of the record, the hearings officer shall render his decision, or submit his report to the Board, as may be appropriate in the case. The decision or report shall be based on the record and shall be in writing. Such decision shall contain a brief statement of (a) the issue or issues raised, (b) the evidence submitted, (c) findings of fact, (d) the decision made, and (e) the reasons therefor. Such report shall contain a statement of (1) the issue or issues raised, (2) the evidence submitted, (3) findings of fact, (4) conclusions of law, (5) recommendations as to the decision to be made by the Board, and (6) such discussion of the foregoing as the hearings officer may desire to present to the Board. Within 15 days after rendition of the decision or submission of the report, a copy of the decision or report shall be mailed to each party at the last address of record. In the case of a report, a copy of the transcript of the hearing, if any was held, shall also be mailed to each party.

[Board Order 66-84, 31 FR 10181, July 28, 1966, as amended at 56 FR 65681, Dec. 18, 1991]
### §286e–1h. Increase of subscription of stock; authority of United States Governor of Bank; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor of the Bank is authorized—

(1) to vote to increase by three hundred and sixty-five thousand shares the authorized capital stock of the Bank; and

(2) to subscribe on behalf of the United States to not more than seventy-three thousand and ten shares of the capital stock of the Bank: Provided, however, That not more than seven and one-half percent ($658,305,195) of the price of the shares subscribed may be paid in to the Bank on subscription, with the remainder of that price ($8,149,256,155) being subject to call only when a call on unpaid subscriptions is required to meet obligations of the Bank for funds borrowed or on loans guaranteed by it and not for use by the Bank in its lending activities or for administrative expenses: Provided further, That any subscription to such additional shares shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(b) In order to pay for the paid-in portion of the United States subscription to the Bank provided for in this section, there is authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $658,305,195 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury: Provided, however, That not more than $109,720,549 of such sum may be made available for each of the fiscal years 1982, 1983, and 1984.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §39, as added Pub. L. 97–35, title XIII, §1311, Aug. 13, 1981, 95 Stat. 740.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Aug. 13, 1981, except that any funds authorized to be appropriated shall not be available for use or obligation prior to Oct. 1, 1981, see section 1372 of Pub. L. 97–35, set out as a note under section 290i of this title.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-2328

JAMIE NEIL PARKER, 

Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

THOMAS H. LOCK, Judge; KRISTEN BALL; KARLA BETH DENNING, 

Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:20-cv-00359-FL) 

Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: February 25, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jamie Neil Parker, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Jamie Neil Parker seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment adopting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his civil action under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal 

was not timely filed. 

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court entered its order on September 15, 2020. Parker filed the notice 

of appeal on December 8, 2020. Because Parker failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We deny Parker’s motion to supplement the record and dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 490.99

 490.63

 490.42

 490.46

 490.21

 489.90

 489.76

 490.10

 490.40

 490.81

 491.11

 491.37

 491.37

 491.50

 491.72

 492.05

 492.50

 493.10

 493.65

 493.96

 494.41

 495.06

 495.48

 496.06

 496.58

 497.24

 498.01

 498.69

 499.12

 499.64

 500.32

 1,405,526

 1,401,495

 1,399,145

 1,399,592

 1,396,797

 1,393,332

 1,391,769

 1,395,567

 1,398,921

 1,403,510

 1,406,870

 1,409,785

 1,409,785

 1,411,243

 1,413,712

 1,417,418

 1,422,477

 1,429,231

 1,435,432

 1,438,931

 1,444,016

 1,451,371

 1,456,130

 1,462,711

 1,468,619

 1,476,130

 1,484,910

 1,492,678

 1,497,597

 1,503,553

 1,511,354

STORAGE

-6,503

-4,031

-2,350

+447

-2,795

-3,465

-1,563

+3,798

+3,354

+4,589

+3,360

+2,915

+0

+1,458

+2,469

+3,706

+5,059

+6,754

+6,201

+3,499

+5,085

+7,355

+4,759

+6,581

+5,908

+7,511

+8,780

+7,768

+4,919

+5,956

+7,801

CHANGE

0

0

0

913

0

0

0

2,743

1,851

2,007

2,041

1,677

0

953

1,453

1,784

2,582

3,954

3,314

2,015

2,878

3,876

2,723

3,799

3,262

4,131

4,901

4,052

2,685

3,347

4,307

PUMPING

 3,033

 1,853

 1,013

 0

 1,680

 1,700

 623

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

POWER

 204

 171

 141

 130

 128

 135

 140

 128

 135

 124

 135

 113

 129

 121

 108

 89

 86

 90

 94

 93

 93

 95

 125

 117

 103

 108

 109

 103

 104

 111

 175

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

TUNNEL

-42

-8

-31

-558

+399

+88

-25

-701

-26

+431

-212

-94

+129

-97

-100

+173

+54

-459

-94

-158

-221

-73

-200

-365

-180

-236

-366

-33

-101

-232

-199

OR

 101

 40

 76

 69

 65

 72

 97

 64

 0

 54

 22

 72

 109

 116

 18

 0

 7

 36

 55

 47

 37

 84

 0

 81

 59

 74

 74

 111

 7

 45

 82

C.F.S.

 .28

 .11

 .21

 .19

 .18

 .20

 .27

 .17

 .00

 .15

 .06

 .20

 .30

 .32

 .05

 .00

 .02

 .10

 .15

 .13

 .10

 .23

 .00

 .22

 .16

 .20

 .20

 .30

 .02

 .12

 .22

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .21

 .36

 .42

 .04

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .02

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION

CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT

CONSOLIDATED STATE-FEDERAL SAN LUIS RESERVOIR April 6, 2020

DAILY OPERATIONS

MARCH 2020 RUN DATE:

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S. LOSS(-)

SAN LUIS

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S. 

TOTALS +99,325 67,248 9,902 3,737 0 -3,537 1,774 4.86 1.20

ACRE-FEET +99,325 133,386 19,641 7,412 0 -7,016 3,519

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 19,641

PACHECO TUNNEL 7,412 TOTAL 27,053

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

JULY 1, 2019 TO DATE = 7.35

 1,412,029

SPILL 0 1.20

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE RESOURCES AGENCY

DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES

STATE WATER PROJECT

PACHECO

GAIN(+)

C.F.S.

OCT 1, 2019 TO DATE = 7.35
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001051818
<NAME> FLAGSTAR CAPITAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,596
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        113,603
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,017
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                690
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     57,500
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,827
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 130,017
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,974
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,974
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,880
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,880
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,880
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   6.804
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### I. B. Miller Contracting Corporation, Appellant, v. B. Turecamo Contracting Co., Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
### §3777. Investigation of accident or injury giving rise to claim

Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a claim may not be considered under this subpart, or an action for damages lie thereon, unless, prior to the departure from the Panama Canal of the vessel involved—

(1) an investigation of the accident or injury giving rise to the claim has been completed, which shall include a hearing by the Board of Local Inspectors of the Commission; and

(2) the basis for the claim has been laid before the Commission.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1417, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 487; Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3544, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2867.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Par. (1). Pub. L. 104–201 amended par. (1) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (1) read as follows: "an investigation by the competent authorities of the accident or injury giving rise to the claim has been completed; and".
#### § 654.14 Filing of complaints.

Complaints arising under subpart B of this part alleging that the Department of Labor has violated the labor surplus area regulations shall be made pursuant to the procedures set forth at § 654.9 of this part.

[48 FR 15616, Apr. 12, 1983]
### §7885. Prohibition against funds for religious worship or instruction

Nothing contained in this chapter shall be construed to authorize the making of any payment under this chapter for religious worship or instruction.

(Pub. L. 89–10, title VIII, §8505, formerly title IX, §9505, as added Pub. L. 107–110, title IX, §901, Jan. 8, 2002, 115 Stat. 1979; renumbered title VIII, §8505, Pub. L. 114–95, title VIII, §8001(a)(5), Dec. 10, 2015, 129 Stat. 2088, 2089.)
#### Abraham Laven, an Infant, etc., Respondent, v. New York Transportation Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §284x. Sixteenth replenishment

(a) The United States Governor of the International Development Association is authorized to contribute on behalf of the United States $4,075,500,000 to the sixteenth replenishment of the resources of the Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $4,075,500,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §26, as added Pub. L. 112–74, div. I, title VII, §7083(a), Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1262.)