alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,051.48

 1,051.30

 1,051.03

 1,050.82

 1,050.68

 1,050.34

 1,050.41

 1,050.32

 1,050.23

 1,050.06

 1,049.80

 1,049.46

 1,049.07

 1,048.70

 1,048.29

 1,047.82

 1,047.27

 1,046.89

 1,046.48

 1,046.04

 1,045.59

 1,045.10

 1,044.63

 1,044.03

 1,043.49

 1,043.06

 1,042.69

 1,042.20

 1,041.68

 1,041.23

 4,104.3

 4,099.2

 4,091.7

 4,085.9

 4,082.0

 4,072.5

 4,074.5

 4,072.0

 4,069.5

 4,064.8

 4,057.6

 4,048.2

 4,037.4

 4,027.2

 4,015.9

 4,003.0

 3,988.0

 3,977.6

 3,966.4

 3,954.4

 3,942.2

 3,928.9

 3,916.2

 3,900.1

 3,885.6

 3,874.0

 3,864.1

 3,851.0

 3,837.2

 3,825.2

STORAGE

-7.3

-5.0

-7.5

-5.8

-3.9

-9.4

+1.9

-2.5

-2.5

-4.7

-7.2

-9.4

-10.8

-10.2

-11.3

-12.9

-15.1

-10.4

-11.2

-12.0

-12.2

-13.3

-12.7

-16.2

-14.5

-11.5

-9.9

-13.1

-13.9

-12.0

CHANGE

 5,841

 6,953

 5,683

 5,856

 6,258

 3,943

 8,403

 6,132

 6,014

 4,999

 4,755

 5,979

 6,290

 6,903

 7,304

 7,287

 4,346

 6,204

 5,748

 6,191

 6,026

 4,960

 4,998

 3,648

 4,565

 6,457

 6,642

 5,945

 5,134

 6,840

INFLOW

 9,129

 9,002

 9,145

 8,479

 7,867

 8,393

 7,129

 7,204

 7,266

 7,338

 8,169

 10,521

 11,497

 11,665

 12,617

 13,332

 11,567

 11,112

 11,011

 11,843

 11,829

 11,323

 11,081

 11,485

 11,586

 11,980

 11,229

 12,178

 11,776

 12,554

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 369

 483

 336

 319

 351

 310

 294

 188

 8

 41

 212

 195

 227

 373

 372

 460

 370

 329

 369

 392

 351

 335

 318

 325

 293

 300

 402

 370

 345

 321

C.F.S.

 .45

 .59

 .41

 .39

 .43

 .38

 .36

 .23

 .01

 .05

 .26

 .24

 .28

 .46

 .46

 .57

 .46

 .41

 .46

 .49

 .44

 .42

 .40

 .41

 .37

 .38

 .51

 .47

 .44

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .62

 .45

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2000 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 3, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -286.5 176,304 311,307 0 0 9,358 11.64 1.15

ACRE-FEET -286,500 349,699 617,477 0 0 18,562

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 617,477

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 617,477

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.15

JULY 1, 1999 70.14

 4,111.5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 239.23

 239.44

 239.81

 240.10

 240.41

 240.44

 239.84

 239.49

 239.24

 239.22

 239.21

 239.17

 239.10

 239.03

 239.20

 239.32

 239.33

 239.27

 239.24

 239.19

 239.20

 239.17

 239.11

 239.11

 239.12

 239.13

 239.22

 239.18

 239.10

 239.08

 239.06

 378

 403

 447

 484

 527

 531

 451

 409

 379

 376

 375

 370

 362

 354

 374

 388

 390

 382

 379

 373

 374

 370

 363

 363

 364

 366

 376

 372

 362

 360

 357

STORAGE

+11

+25

+44

+37

+43

+4

-80

-42

-30

-3

-1

-5

-8

-8

+20

+14

+2

-8

-3

-6

+1

-4

-7

+0

+1

+2

+10

-4

-10

-2

-3

CHANGE

 398

 264

 36

 9

 9

 9

 376

 407

 516

 466

 213

 297

 452

 502

 581

 555

 555

 458

 504

 545

 505

 627

 616

 627

 630

 538

 411

 628

 706

 798

 840

 10,300

 10,900

 12,300

 13,000

 15,400

 14,500

 12,600

 11,100

 10,400

 10,100

 9,650

 9,670

 9,630

 9,650

 10,400

 10,700

 10,300

 10,500

 10,300

 9,490

 9,480

 9,410

 9,140

 9,160

 9,070

 9,140

 9,090

 9,390

 9,330

 9,250

 9,210

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2009 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2009

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -10 14,078 322,560

ACRE-FEET -10 27,924 639,798

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 669,122

 367

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 11

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 33

 40

 32

 13

 19

 22

 9

 18

 35

 23

 34

 32

 32

 44

 25

 24

 16

 28

 20

 10

 42

 50

 28

 37

 29

 706

 1,400

CORNING CANAL 1,400

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 27,924

TO SACTO RIVER 639,798
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25226-25227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10176]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[FMCSA-2012-0102]


Proposed Recommendations on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Withdrawal of Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA is withdrawing its proposed regulatory guidance for 
obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and request for comment as published on 
April 20, 2012. The Agency is still in the process of carefully 
reviewing the recommendations submitted by the Motor Carrier Safety 
Advisory Committee and Medical Review Board. The initial publication 
was a clerical error. We anticipate requesting public comment on the 
recommendations later this year.

DATES: This withdrawal is effective April 27, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Ward, Nurse Consultant Medical 
Programs, (202) 366-4001, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a2c2729392b272f2e23292b260a2e253e642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d2b202e3e2c202829242e2c210d292239632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>, FMCSA, Department of 
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224, Washington, 
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    A notice was published in the Federal Register on April 20, 2012 
(77 FR 23794) announcing proposed regulatory guidance on OSA and the 
medical certification of commercial motor vehicle drivers based on 
joint recommendations from the Agency's Motor Carrier Safety Advisory 
Committee and the Medical Review Board. Because there are a number of 
initiatives and programs for which the Agency is currently seeking 
public engagement and comment, however, the Agency defers until later 
this year, a request for public comment on the

[[Page 25227]]

regulatory guidance on OSA. This will enable interested parties a 
better opportunity to focus on and provide comments on this important 
safety issue.

    Issued on: April 20, 2012.
William Bronrott,
 Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2012-10176 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 684.400 What is the purpose of the supplemental youth services program?

The purpose of this program is to provide supplemental employment and training and related services to low-income INA youth on or near Indian reservations and in Oklahoma, Alaska, or Hawaii.
###### Editorial Note on Part 71

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 71 appear by T.D. ATF-414, 64 FR 49084, Sept. 10, 1999and T.D. ATF-463, 66 FR 42734, 42735, Aug. 15, 2001.

#### § 71.76 At hearing.

Motions at the hearing may be made in writing to the administrative law judge or stated orally on the record.
#### § 702.301 Scope of this subpart.

The regulations in this subpart govern the adjudication of claims in which the employer has filed a notice of controversion under § 702.251, or the employee has filed notice of contest under § 702.261. In the vast majority of cases, the problem giving rise to the controversy results from misunderstandings, clerical or mechanical errors, or mistakes of fact or law. Such problems seldom require resolution through formal hearings, with the attendant production of expert witnesses. Accordingly, by § 702.311 *et seq.,* the district directors are empowered to amicably and promptly resolve such problems by informal procedures. Where there is a genuine dispute of fact or law which cannot be so disposed of informally, resort must be had to the formal hearing procedures as set forth beginning at § 702.331. Supplementary compensation orders, modifications, and interlocutory matters are governed by regulations beginning with § 702.371. Thereafter, appeals from compensation orders are discussed beginning with § 702.391 (the regulations of the Benefits Review Board are set forth in full in part 802 of this title).
Exhibit 23.1
 
 
 
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board of Directors
 TechPrecision Corporation.:
 
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333 148152) on Form S-8,  of TechPrecision Corporation and subsidiaries of our report dated July 16, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of TechPrecision Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operation and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the March 31, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K of TechPrecision Corporation.
 
 
 
 /s/ KPMG LLP
 
 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 July 16, 2012
### §3961. Salaries of chiefs of mission

(a) Except as provided in section 3942(b) of this title, each chief of mission shall receive a salary, as determined by the President, at one of the annual rates payable for levels II through V of the Executive Schedule under sections 5313 through 5316 of title 5, except that the total compensation, exclusive of danger pay, for any chief of mission shall be subject to the limitation on certain payments under section 5307 of title 5 or the limitation under section 3962(a)(3) of this title, whichever is higher.

(b) The salary of a chief of mission shall commence upon the effective date of appointment to that position. The official services of a chief of mission are not terminated by the appointment of a successor, but shall continue for such additional period, not to exceed 50 days after relinquishment of charge of the mission, as the Secretary of State may determine. During that period, the Secretary of State may require the chief of mission to perform such functions as the Secretary of State deems necessary in the interest of the Government.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §401, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2087; Pub. L. 100–204, title I, §177(a), Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1362; Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §142(b), Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 668; Pub. L. 108–447, div. B, title IV, §412(c), Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2905.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2004—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–447, which directed the substitution of "shall be subject to the limitation on certain payments under section 5307 of title 5 or the limitation under section 3962(a)(3) of this title, whichever is higher" for "shall not exceed the annual rate of pay payable for level I of such Executive Schedule", was executed by making the substitution for "shall not exceed the annual rate payable for level I of such Executive Schedule" to reflect the probable intent of Congress.

1991—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 102–138 substituted "Except as provided in section 3942(b) of this title, each" for "Each" and "level I of such" for "level II of such".

1987—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–204 substituted "Each chief" for "Except as provided in section 3942(b) of this title, each chief", and inserted before period at end ", except that the total compensation, exclusive of danger pay, for any chief of mission shall not exceed the annual rate payable for level II of such Executive Schedule".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1987 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 100–204 not applicable to salary of any individual serving under Presidential appointment under section 3942 of this title immediately before Dec. 22, 1987, during the period such individual continues to serve in such position, see section 177(c) of Pub. L. 100–204, set out as a note under section 3942 of this title.
§ 686.950 What procedures apply to disclosure of information about Job Corps students and program activities? ( a ) The Secretary develops procedures to respond to requests for information or records or other necessary disclosures pertaining to students.
( b ) Department disclosure of Job Corps information must be handled according to the Freedom of Information Act and according to Department regulations at 29 CFR part 70.
( c ) Job Corps contractors are not “agencies” for Freedom of Information Act purposes. Therefore, their records are not subject to disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act or 29 CFR part 70.
( d ) The regulations at 29 CFR part 71 apply to a system of records covered by the Privacy Act of 1974 maintained by the Department or to a similar system maintained by a contractor, such as a screening agency, contract center operator, or career transition service provider on behalf of the Job Corps.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00304- CV

Jaim e Me ndez Cuellar, Appellant

v. Brad Livi ngston et al., Appellees

F ROM TH E UNITED STATES DI STRICT CO URT F OR THE NORTH ERN DISTRICT O F TEXAS, AM ARILLO DIVIS IO N NO. 2: 07- CV-00 1580 -J- B B , H ONO RAB LE MARY LO U ROB INSO N, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant filed a notice of appea l complaining of a dismiss al order signe d by the trial court judge in the United States District Court for t h e No rt h er n District of Texas. We may only exercise jurisdiction over cause s that arise out of the State-leve l district or county courts within our district and are without jurisdiction over the fede ral courts. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.220(a)
. We there fore dismiss the appe al for w ant of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(a)
.

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: Aug ust 22, 2013
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20

- 1527 V

UNPUBLISHED

DRU ELLIOTT

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: May 20, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Damages Decision Based on Proffer;

Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder

Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Howard Scott Gold, Gold Law Firm, LLC, Wellesley Hills, MA , for Petitioner.

Terrence Kevin Mangan, Jr. , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for

Respondent.

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1

On November 5, 2020

, Dru Elliott filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”) . Petitioner alleges that she suffered a sh ou lde r inj ury related to vaccine

administration ( “ SIRV A ” ) as a result of an influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccine that was administe red

on September 24, 2019

. Petition at 1

. The case was assigned to the Special Processing

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 20, 2022

, a ruling on entitlement was issued , finding P etitioner entitled to

compensation for SIRVA . On May 19, 2022

, R espondent filed a combined Rule 4

report/ p roffer on a ward of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating P etitioner should be

awarded $ 60,000.00

. R ule 4/ Proffer at 4

. In the Rule 4/ Proffer, R espondent represented

1 Because this unpublished D ecision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic

Government Services). This means the D ecision will be available to anyone with access to the

internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact

medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy.

If, upon review, I agree that the identified material f its within this definition, I will redact such material from

public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the p ertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2012).2

that P etitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the rec ord as a whole, I find

that P etitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Rule 4/ Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the Rule 4 / Proffer, I award P etitioner a lump sum

payment of $ 60,000.0 0 in the form of a check payable to P etitioner

. This amount

represents compensation for all damages that w ould be available under Section 15 (a)

.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Michael French, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of MDRNA, Inc. (MDRNA), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of MDRNA on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MDRNA.

Date: May 15, 2009



|    |  |                       |  |                                                
|--- |  | --------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ J. Michael French
|    |  | Name:                 |  | J. Michael French                              
|    |  | Title:                |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MDRNA and will be
retained by MDRNA and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by MDRNA for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
FORM 6-K
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                        REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

                    Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

                           For the month of June 2004

                        Commission File Number: 0-30852

                          GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.

                          Galicia Financial Group S.A.
                 (Translation of registrant's name into English)

                          Tte. Gral. Juan D. Peron 456
                       (C1038AAJ) Buenos Aires, Argentina
                    (Address of principal executive offices)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

                        Form 20-F X    Form 40-F
                                 ---            ---

Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this
Form, the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                              Yes       No X
                                 ---      ---

If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
                                   ---------------

<PAGE>
                                    FORM 6-K

                           Commission File No. 0-30852

   Month Filed                 Event and Summary                     Exhibit No.

   June 2004      Correspondence from Banco de Galicia y Buenos         99.1
                  Aires S.A. to the National Securities
                  Commission of Argentina, dated June 1, 2004,
                  regarding the establishment of a trust.

                  Correspondence  from Banco de Galicia y Buenos        99.2
                  Aires S.A to the Buenos Aires Stock
                  Exchange, dated June 1, 2004, regarding the
                  establishment of a trust.

                  Correspondence from Banco de Galicia y Buenos         99.3
                  Aires S.A to the Cordoba Stock Exchange,
                  dated June 1, 2004, regarding the establishment
                  of a trust.




<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                       GRUPO FINANCIERO GALICIA S.A.
                                       (Registrant)



Date:  June 9, 2004                    By:  /s/ Antonio Garces
                                          ------------------------------
                                          Name:  Antonio Garces
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
§ 680.920 Are there limits on the amount or duration of funds for supportive services? ( a ) Local WDBs may establish limits on the provision of supportive services or provide the one-stop center with the authority to establish such limits, including a maximum amount of funding and maximum length of time for supportive services to be available to participants.
( b ) Procedures also may be established to allow one-stop centers to grant exceptions to the limits established under paragraph (a) of this section.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Acorn Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thequarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Zummo, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.       /s/ Robert A. Zummo         Robert A. Zummo, Chairman,    President and Chief Executive    Officer  October 21, 2005