alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STORAGE - A.F. CHANGE SHASTA NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV

IRON

CANYON PIT 6 PIT 7

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S

RIVER 

C.F.S

NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 35,903 29,404 7,955 14,941 30,074 118,277 -495 -250 8,021 7,771 4,690.5

2 33,914 29,000 7,040 15,310 32,340 117,604 -673 -339 7,486 7,147 4,704.7

3 33,801 28,653 7,548 15,273 32,021 117,296 -308 -155 6,815 6,660 4,717.9

4 34,201 28,463 8,291 15,019 32,284 118,258 962 485 6,424 6,909 4,731.6

5 34,074 28,383 7,881 14,551 31,826 116,715 -1,543 -778 7,397 6,619 4,744.7

6 34,567 28,259 7,572 15,316 30,616 116,330 -385 -194 6,507 6,313 4,757.3

7 35,587 28,158 8,129 14,565 29,928 116,367 37 19 6,112 6,131 4,769.4

8 34,723 28,061 8,158 14,253 32,345 117,540 1,173 591 5,466 6,057 4,781.4

9 34,218 27,941 8,299 12,862 32,719 116,039 -1,501 -757 6,818 6,061 4,793.5

10 34,926 27,743 8,181 12,225 31,199 114,274 -1,765 -890 6,284 5,394 4,804.2

11 35,782 27,453 8,928 11,730 30,858 114,751 477 240 4,776 5,016 4,814.1

12 36,423 27,144 8,346 13,503 29,793 115,209 458 231 4,927 5,158 4,824.3

13 36,338 26,760 7,880 14,217 30,790 115,985 776 391 4,690 5,081 4,834.4

14 35,294 8,627 26,335 14,537 33,090 117,883 1,898 957 3,954 4,911 4,844.1

15 34,485 8,104 25,835 11,916 31,807 112,147 -5,736 -2,892 7,915 5,023 4,854.1

16 34,634 6,897 25,202 12,665 29,231 108,629 -3,518 -1,774 7,413 5,639 4,865.3

17 34,062 24,553 7,448 14,603 28,329 108,995 366 185 5,280 5,465 4,876.1

18 33,870 23,982 8,006 15,252 27,327 108,437 -558 -281 5,363 5,082 4,886.2

19 34,244 23,394 8,241 14,609 30,394 110,882 2,445 1,233 3,884 5,117 4,896.4

20 35,072 22,779 8,221 12,491 31,909 110,472 -410 -207 5,274 5,067 4,906.4

21 33,872 22,152 8,242 11,819 32,125 108,210 -2,262 -1,140 5,641 2,547 4,911.5

22 33,634 21,546 8,325 11,893 30,908 106,306 -1,904 -960 4,631 3,671 4,918.8

23 35,423 20,963 8,420 9,345 30,089 104,240 -2,066 -1,042 6,373 5,331 4,929.3

24 35,773 20,416 9,057 10,998 29,341 105,585 1,345 678 3,685 4,363 4,938.0

25 34,336 20,057 10,250 12,738 30,194 107,575 1,990 1,003 4,330 5,333 4,948.6

26 33,812 19,816 10,486 12,880 31,401 108,395 820 413 4,420 4,833 4,958.1

27 34,062 19,601 11,252 14,108 31,000 110,023 1,628 821 3,371 4,192 4,966.5

28 34,477 19,491 11,942 14,435 30,953 111,298 1,275 643 3,771 4,414 4,975.2

29 35,441 19,415 12,044 13,960 31,565 112,425 1,127 568 3,763 4,331 4,983.8

30 35,705 13,189 19,417 14,347 31,905 114,563 2,138 1,078 3,248 4,326 4,992.4

Totals -4,209 159,962

Acre - Feet 317,285

* October 1, 2022 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At Shasta Dam

Run Date: 7/18/2023

June 2023
§ 678.500 What is the Memorandum of Understanding for the one-stop delivery system and what must be included in the Memorandum of Understanding? ( a ) The MOU is the product of local discussion and negotiation, and is an agreement developed and executed between the Local WDB and the one-stop partners, with the agreement of the chief elected official and the one-stop partners, relating to the operation of the one-stop delivery system in the local area. Two or more local areas in a region may develop a single joint MOU, if they are in a region that has submitted a regional plan under sec. 106 of WIOA.
( b ) The MOU must include: ( 1 ) A description of services to be provided through the one-stop delivery system, including the manner in which the services will be coordinated and delivered through the system;
( 2 ) Agreement on funding the costs of the services and the operating costs of the system, including: ( i ) Funding of infrastructure costs of one-stop centers in accordance with §§ 678.700 through 678.755; and
( ii ) Funding of the shared services and operating costs of the one-stop delivery system described in § 678.760;
( 3 ) Methods for referring individuals between the one-stop operators and partners for appropriate services and activities;
( 4 ) Methods to ensure that the needs of workers, youth, and individuals with barriers to employment, including individuals with disabilities, are addressed in providing access to services, including access to technology and materials that are available through the one-stop delivery system;
( 5 ) The duration of the MOU and procedures for amending it; and
( 6 ) Assurances that each MOU will be reviewed, and if substantial changes have occurred, renewed, not less than once every 3-year period to ensure appropriate funding and delivery of services.
( c ) The MOU may contain any other provisions agreed to by the parties that are consistent with WIOA title I, the authorizing statutes and regulations of one-stop partner programs, and the WIOA regulations.
( d ) When fully executed, the MOU must contain the signatures of the Local WDB, one-stop partners, the chief elected official(s), and the time period in which the agreement is effective. The MOU must be updated not less than every 3 years to reflect any changes in the signatory official of the Board, one-stop partners, and chief elected officials, or one-stop infrastructure funding.
( e ) If a one-stop partner appeal to the State regarding infrastructure costs, using the process described in § 678.750, results in a change to the one-stop partner's infrastructure cost contributions, the MOU must be updated to reflect the final one-stop partner infrastructure cost contributions.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1111 How we count earned income. ( a ) *Wages.* We count wages at the earliest of the following points: when you receive them or when they are credited to your account or set aside for your use. We determine wages for each month. We count wages for services performed as a member of a uniformed service (as defined in § 404.1330 of this chapter) as received in the month in which they are earned.
( b ) *Net earnings from self-employment.* We count net earnings from self-employment on a taxable year basis. However, we divide the total of these earnings equally among the months in the taxable year to get your earnings for each month. For example, if your net earnings for a taxable year are $2,400, we consider that you received $200 in each month. If you have net losses from self-employment, we divide them over the taxable year in the same way, and we deduct them only from your other earned income.
( c ) *Payments for services in a sheltered workshop or activities center.* We count payments you receive for services performed in a sheltered workshop or work activities center when you receive them or when they are set aside for your use. We determine the amount of the payments for each calendar quarter.
( d ) *In-kind earned income.* We use the current market value of in-kind earned income for SSI purposes. (See § 416.1101 for a definition of current market value.) If you receive an item that is not fully paid for and are responsible for the unpaid balance, only the paid-up value is income to you. (See the example in § 416.1123(c)).
( e ) *Royalties and honoraria.* We count payments of royalties to you in connection with any publication of your work, and honoraria, to the extent received for services rendered, at the earliest of the following points: when you receive them, when they are credited to your account, or when they are set aside for your use. (See § 416.1111(b) if you receive royalties as part of your trade or business.)
[45 FR 65547, Oct. 3, 1980, as amended at 48 FR 23179, May 24, 1983; 48 FR 30357, July 1, 1983; 50 FR 48574, Nov. 26, 1985; 58 FR 63889, Dec. 3, 1993; 59 FR 43471, Aug. 24, 1994; 71 FR 45378, Aug. 9, 2006]
### §1631c. Filing of order of conveyance

Any vesting order, or other order or requirement issued pursuant to this subchapter, or a duly certified copy thereof, may be filed, registered, or recorded in any office for the filing, registering, or recording of conveyances, transfers, or assignments of such property as may be covered by such order or requirement; and if so filed, registered, or recorded shall impart the same notice and have the same force and effect as a duly executed conveyance, transfer, or assignment so filed, registered, or recorded.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title II, §204, as added Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 645, §3, 69 Stat. 563.)
### SUBCHAPTER I—IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ENHANCED DEFENSE PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND TAIWAN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ELVIS AARON RICCARDI,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 337 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 254

 308

 252

 238

 245

 313

 335

 373

 332

 279

 349

 258

 280

 308

 327

 283

 214

 199

 205

 205

 250

 339

 421

 437

 425

 446

 401

 330

 341

 269

 116

 126

 125

 127

 129

 134

 135

 136

 122

 133

 116

 122

 128

 117

 116

 126

 132

 132

 123

 121

 124

 137

 155

 135

 139

 131

 122

 131

 123

 133

 198

 202

 187

 183

 190

 211

 208

 223

 202

 192

 197

 180

 178

 192

 203

 198

 181

 173

 166

 162

 174

 195

 225

 235

 243

 234

 226

 217

 212

 203

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 4, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ROCK FINANCIAL CORPORATION AS OF, AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED, SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      37,091,876
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 41,277,617
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      14,045,323
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,405,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,251,941
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       148,535
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,103,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,251,941
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            48,996,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,083,086
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,401,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,506,446)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,210,264)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,152,121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,152,121)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.15)


</TABLE>
### Part 1—Purposes
CAUSE NO. WR-65,038-02 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN

__________________________________________________ CAUSE NO. W00-53218-M(C) EX PARTE § IN THE 194 TH JUDICIAL § § DISTRICT COURT § BRANDON WOODARD § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

________________________________________________ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

_________________________________________________ COMES NOW, Bruce Anton, acting as court appointed attorney in this cause, and moves this court to issue an extension of time to perfect h is claim, and in support thereof would show the court as follows: I. This writ of habeas corpus is currently pending in the194th Jud icial District Court of Dallas County, Texas. A n order was issued on October 1, 2014 ordering the trial court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law by January 29, 2015 in regard to Applicant’s claim th at he is actually innocent. A notice from the Court of Criminal Appeals was sent on July 30, 2015, notifying the court that to date, a

WR-65,038-02 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/12/2015 3:11:58 PM Accepted 8/12/2015 3:30:04 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERKsupplemental record including the finding of fact has not been filed. II. The undersigned attorney was appointed as his counsel at the re quest of the conviction integrity unit of the Dallas District Attorney’s of fice. The investigation of the claim involves locating a co-defendant who has been release d from prison. The witness’s residence has been l ocated, but counsel’s investigato r has been unable to contact the witness himself. III. Counsel requests that the court grant him an additional 90 days from this date to complete the investigation. VI. The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request for e xtension are recited above. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the undersigned attorney reques ts this court to grant an extension of time of 90 days to complet e the prosecution of this writ. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, /s/ Bruce Anton BRUCE ANTON State Bar No. 01274700 S ORRELS U DASHEN & ANTON2311 Cedar Springs, Suite 250 Dallas, Texas 75201 214/468-8100 214/468-8104 (fax)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that a true and correct copy of Appellant’s motion for extension was served to the Dallas County District Attorney’s O ffice, Appellate Division, via email through the e-filing.

/s/ Bruce Anton BRUCE ANTON
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 227

 223

 224

 241

 235

 238

 228

 240

 243

 252

 252

 243

 271

 248

 245

 256

 278

 291

 289

 284

 289

 296

 299

 276

 282

 279

 273

 281

 263

 263

 284

 154

 131

 132

 131

 125

 135

 146

 148

 156

 166

 150

 144

 138

 148

 152

 165

 183

 197

 206

 223

 222

 233

 226

 227

 225

 223

 224

 229

 222

 215

 204

 179

 186

 170

 171

 173

 174

 180

 190

 192

 201

 200

 195

 206

 206

 202

 204

 220

 237

 243

 247

 250

 254

 255

 248

 249

 251

 245

 250

 242

 238

 238

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 4, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,030.10

 1,030.30

 1,030.62

 1,030.79

 1,030.96

 1,031.31

 1,031.64

 1,032.03

 1,032.41

 1,032.61

 1,032.27

 1,031.95

 1,031.67

 1,031.40

 1,031.31

 1,031.58

 1,031.97

 1,032.19

 1,031.98

 1,031.88

 1,031.74

 1,031.65

 1,031.64

 1,031.66

 1,031.66

 1,031.72

 1,031.81

 1,032.00

 3,536.0

 3,541.1

 3,549.2

 3,553.5

 3,557.8

 3,566.7

 3,575.1

 3,585.1

 3,594.8

 3,599.9

 3,591.2

 3,583.0

 3,575.9

 3,569.0

 3,566.7

 3,573.6

 3,583.5

 3,589.1

 3,583.8

 3,581.2

 3,577.7

 3,575.4

 3,575.1

 3,575.6

 3,575.6

 3,577.2

 3,579.4

 3,584.3

STORAGE

-0.8

+5.1

+8.1

+4.3

+4.3

+8.9

+8.4

+9.9

+9.7

+5.1

-8.7

-8.2

-7.1

-6.9

-2.3

+6.9

+9.9

+5.6

-5.4

-2.5

-3.6

-2.3

-0.3

+0.5

+0.0

+1.5

+2.3

+4.8

CHANGE

 10,678

 11,060

 10,338

 8,454

 8,278

 9,061

 8,907

 9,963

 9,802

 7,462

 6,542

 6,690

 7,288

 6,671

 9,737

 12,611

 11,945

 10,556

 8,829

 9,773

 8,843

 7,365

 7,501

 8,929

 7,749

 8,138

 7,524

 6,813

INFLOW

 11,061

 8,475

 6,205

 6,170

 6,002

 4,383

 4,610

 4,879

 4,816

 4,822

 10,854

 10,726

 10,853

 10,131

 10,893

 9,144

 6,938

 7,667

 11,016

 11,057

 10,595

 8,484

 7,554

 8,575

 7,689

 7,233

 6,353

 4,306

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 513

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 30

 45

 112

 105

 187

 60

 75

 83

 60

 75

 90

 30

 7

 0

 0

 0

 53

 8

 0

 45

 37

 75

 97

 60

 135

 15

 68

C.F.S.

 .00

 .04

 .06

 .15

 .14

 .25

 .08

 .10

 .11

 .08

 .10

 .12

 .04

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .07

 .01

 .00

 .06

 .05

 .10

 .13

 .08

 .18

 .02

 .09

INCHES

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .37

 .11

 .01

 2.30

 .04

 .00

 .13

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2003 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +47.2 247,507 221,491 0 513 1,552 2.07 2.99

ACRE-FEET +47,200 490,930 439,327 0 1,018 3,078

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 439,327

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 1,018

 440,345

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.99

JULY 1, 2002 52.83

 3,536.8
§ 411.470 When does an IWP become effective? ( a ) An IWP becomes effective if the following requirements are met— ( 1 ) It has been signed by the beneficiary or the beneficiary's representative, and by a representative of the EN;
( 2 ) ( i ) The beneficiary is eligible to assign his or her ticket under § 411.140(a); or
( ii ) The beneficiary is eligible to reassign his or her ticket under § 411.150(a) and (b); and
( 3 ) A representative of the EN submits a copy of the signed IWP to the PM and the PM receives the copy of the IWP.
( b ) If all of the requirements in paragraph (a) of this section are met, the IWP will be effective on the first day on which the requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section are met.
### §282k. Securities issued by Corporation

#### (a) Exemption from securities laws; reports to Securities and Exchange Commission

Any securities issued by the Corporation (including any guaranty by the Corporation, whether or not limited in scope) and any securities guaranteed by the Corporation as to both principal and interest shall be deemed to be exempted securities within the meaning of section 77c(a)(2) of title 15 and section 78c(a)(12) of title 15. The Corporation shall file with the Securities and Exchange Commission such annual and other reports with regard to such securities as the Commission shall determine to be appropriate in view of the special character of the Corporation and its operations and necessary in the public interest or for the protection of investors.

#### (b) Authority of Securities and Exchange Commission to suspend exemption; reports to Congress

The Securities and Exchange Commission, acting in consultation with the National Advisory Council on International Monetary and Financial Problems, is authorized to suspend the provisions of subsection (a) at any time as to any or all securities issued or guaranteed by the Corporation during the period of such suspension. The Commission shall include in its annual reports to the Congress such information as it shall deem advisable with regard to the operations and effect of this section.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 788, §13, as added Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(e)(1)(A), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2037.)
#### STATE, Respondent, v. ELOE, Appellant.

(240 N. W. 486.)

(File No. 7114.

Opinion filed January 30, 1932.)

*P. A. Hosford,*of Winner, for Appellant.

*M. Q. Sharpe,*Attorney General, and' *Charles P. Warren,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of adultery, committed -by engaging in sexual intercourse with his own fifteen year old daughter. From the judgment and denial of his motion for new trial he has appealed.

We have examined the record in this case with care. It is not edifying and we see no need for discussing it in any detail in this opinion. The evidence introduced' by the state, which appears to have been believed by the jury indicates that defendant had sexual relations with his daughter with greater or lesser frequency during a period of some five years prior to the particular act charged in the information. The sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict is not challenged on this appeal.

Appellant predicates error upon four rulings of the trial court admitting certain testimony and exhibits. We seriously doubt whether any of the rulings complained of were erroneous, and' we are thoroughly persuaded that none of them were prejudicial.

Appellant urges as error that his counsel was unduly restricted in cross-examining one of the state’s witnesses. We think that counsel was permitted ample latitude in his interrogations, and that the scope of 'his cross-examination was not in any degree improperly limited.

*441Appellant complains of certain remarks- of the trial court addressed -to counsel. We -believe, under the circumstances shown by the record, the remarks of the court were entirely justified. We think no prejudice resulted therefrom, and', in any event, the remarks, even if improper, would constitute an irregularity under subdivision I, § 2555, R. C. 1919, and must be reviewed upon affidavits and not upon a settled record. Section 2556, R. C. 1919.

Appellant requested an instruction, going to the point that all evidence as- to other acts of sexual intercourse between appellant and his daughter was admitted as corroborative only, and that before conviction could be had the jury must believe, beyond -a reasonable doubt, that the defendant was guilty of the particular act 'charged in the information. -The learned trial judge refused the requested instruction, but gave an instruction of his own upon -the point, to which appellant excepted. We think that the instruction given by the trial court fully and adequately. covered the point involved and was in no manner misleading or confusing to the jury, and that the instructions as a whole submitted the cause fully, fairly and' properly.

A careful examination of all of appellant’s assignments fails to disclose any prejudicial error in the record.

The judgment and order appealed from are therefore affirmed.

All the Judges concur, excepting ROBERTS-, J., disqualified and not sitting.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports included in this registration statement and to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated January 29, 1999
(except with respect to the matter discussed in Note 17, as to which the date is
March 16, 1999) included in Lear Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998, and to all references to our firm included in this
registration statement.

                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Detroit, Michigan,

  October 14, 1999.
#### The Messiah Home for Children, etc., v. Henry H. Rogers, Jr., Individually, and Others.

Motion granted; question certified as stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ.