alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 724.28

 724.66

 724.66

 724.66

 734.70

 732.62

 726.37

 724.82

 728.82

 737.68

 748.52

 753.98

 764.01

 764.85

 760.10

 753.35

 745.39

 735.88

 724.63

 720.32

 724.46

 727.50

 730.03

 732.13

 734.00

 734.54

 730.74

 726.58

 725.72

 727.20

 728.49

 1,345

 1,360

 1,360

 1,360

 1,781

 1,688

 1,427

 1,366

 1,527

 1,919

 2,480

 2,800

 3,437

 3,493

 3,181

 2,762

 2,307

 1,834

 1,359

 1,198

 1,352

 1,473

 1,577

 1,667

 1,749

 1,773

 1,607

 1,435

 1,401

 1,460

 1,513

STORAGE

+23

+15

+0

+0

+421

-93

-261

-61

+161

+392

+561

+320

+637

+56

-312

-419

-455

-473

-475

-161

+154

+121

+104

+90

+82

+24

-166

-172

-34

+59

+53

CHANGE

12

8

0

0

300

253

153

77

81

198

492

469

637

345

154

95

70

62

62

59

78

61

52

45

41

33

16

10

21

30

27

INFLOW

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 88

 300

 285

 108

 0

 0

 209

 308

 316

 317

 311

 306

 299

 300

 301

 140

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 100

 97

 38

 0

 0

TIME COPPER

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 SPRING CREEK DEBRIS RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 7, 2016

IN LAKE

SPRING CR DEBRIS DAM

ZINC

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +191 3,941 0 3,844

ACRE-FEET +191 7,817 0 7,625

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 7,625

 7,625

 1,322

SPILL OUTLET

**KES

COPPER

MG/L
September 2022

STORAGE ACRE-FEET COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S. EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE INFLOW C.F.S. PUTAH 

SOUTH

PUTAH 

CREEK

C.F.S. INCHES INCHES

658

1 130.70 656 -2 540 504 36 1 0.39 0.00

2 130.92 680 24 519 469 36 2 0.43 0.00

3 130.59 643 -37 434 414 37 2 0.44 0.00

4 130.65 650 7 454 412 37 1 0.37 0.00

5 130.80 667 17 477 430 37 1 0.39 0.00

6 130.71 657 -10 495 461 37 2 0.46 0.00

7 130.77 664 7 487 444 37 2 0.51 0.00

8 130.81 668 4 476 435 37 2 0.57 0.00

9 130.84 671 3 442 401 37 2 0.45 0.00

10 130.81 668 -3 405 369 37 1 0.39 0.00

11 130.84 671 3 421 381 37 1 0.27 0.00

12 130.80 667 -4 466 430 37 1 0.27 0.00

13 130.90 678 11 480 436 37 1 0.33 0.00

14 130.89 677 -1 476 440 36 1 0.31 0.00

15 130.79 666 -11 466 437 34 1 0.30 0.00

16 130.85 673 7 416 377 34 1 0.24 0.00

17 130.68 654 -19 353 326 36 1 0.20 0.00

18 130.61 645 -9 350 317 37 1 0.21 0.03

19 130.81 668 23 343 296 35 0 0.09 0.35

20 130.63 648 -20 254 234 30 0 0.09 0.19

21 130.52 635 -13 199 178 28 0 0.14 0.06

22 130.64 649 14 212 173 31 1 0.15 0.00

23 130.62 646 -3 199 168 32 1 0.26 0.00

24 130.54 637 -9 205 177 32 1 0.25 0.00

25 130.78 665 28 216 169 32 1 0.25 0.00

26 130.74 660 -5 252 222 32 1 0.27 0.00

27 130.72 658 -2 285 253 32 1 0.15 0.00

28 130.66 651 -7 299 270 32 1 0.26 0.00

29 130.55 639 -12 292 265 32 1 0.26 0.00

30 130.59 643 4 276 241 32 1 0.26 0.00

TOTALS -15 11,189 10,129 1,036 33 8.96 0.63

ACRE-FEET -15 22,193 20,091 2,055 65

Comments: *Computed inflow is the sum of change in storage, releases and evaporation.

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Putah South Canal 20,091

Putah Creek 2,055

Total 22,146

Precipitation

This month = 0.63

October 01, 2021 To date = 20.54

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Solano Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/17/2023
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0071. ACTAVO ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC v. INSIGHT

GLOBAL, LLC.

Insight Global, LLC, filed a breach of contract action against Actavo

Engineering Services, LLC, which failed to file a timely answer. The trial court

entered default judgment, and Actavo Engineering filed a motion to set aside under

OCGA § 9-11-60 (d). The trial court denied the motion, and Actavo Engineering

appeals. We lack jurisdiction.

“[T]he denial of a motion to set aside a final judgment under OCGA § 9-11-60

is not directly appealable and instead requires the filing of an application for

discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (b).” Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson,

283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). “Compliance with the discretionary

appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga.

App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Actavo Engineering’s failure to follow the

required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 31, 2021

08/31/2021
### §2734g. Promoting transparency and accountability in the Department of State workforce

#### (a) In general

The Secretary should establish a mechanism to ensure that appointments or details of Department career employees to staff positions in the Office of the Secretary, the Office of the Deputy Secretary of State, the Office of the Counselor of the Department, any office of the Secretary's Policy Planning Staff, and any office of an Under Secretary of State, and details to the National Security Council, are transparent, competitive, inclusive, and merit-based.

#### (b) Report

Not later than 90 days after December 23, 2022, the Secretary shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees regarding the mechanism established pursuant to subsection (a).

#### (c) Availability

The Secretary shall—

(1) use transparent, competitive, inclusive, and merit-based processes for appointments and details to the staff positions specified in subsection (a); and

(2) ensure that such positions are equally available to all employees of the Civil Service and the Foreign Service of the Department.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. I, title XCIV, §9404, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3896.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Rule of Construction

Pub. L. 117–263, div. I, title XCIV, §9405, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3897, provided that: "Nothing in this title [enacting this section] may be construed as altering existing law regarding merit system principles."

#### Definitions

For definitions of "Secretary", "Department", and "appropriate congressional committees" as used in this section, see section 9002 of Pub. L. 117–263, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.
#### § 702.204 Employer's report; penalty for failure to furnish and or falsifying.

Any employer, insurance carrier, or self-insured employer who knowingly and willfully fails or refuses to send any report required by § 702.201, or who knowingly or willfully makes a false statement or misrepresentation in any report, shall be subject to a civil penalty not to exceed $29,221 for each such failure, refusal, false statement, or misrepresentation for which penalties are assessed after January 15, 2024. The district director has the authority and responsibility for assessing a civil penalty under this section.

[81 FR 43449, July 1, 2016, as amended at 82 FR 5380, Jan. 18, 2017; 83 FR 11, Jan. 2, 2018; 84 FR 217, Jan. 23, 2019; 85 FR 2296, Jan. 15, 2020; 86 FR 2967, Jan. 14, 2021; 87 FR 2333, Jan. 14, 2022; 88 FR 2215, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 1814, Jan. 11, 2023]
### §290k–5. Applicability of Bretton Woods Agreements Act

The provisions of section 286b of this title shall apply with respect to the Agency to the same extent as with respect to the Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

(Pub. L. 100–202, §101(e) [title I], Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1329–131, 1329–134; Pub. L. 101–240, title V, §541(e)(5), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2518.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Bretton Woods Agreements Act, referred to in section catchline, is act July 31, 1945, ch. 339, 59 Stat. 512, which is classified principally to subchapter XV (§286 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 286 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section is based on section 408 of title IV of H.R. 3750, One Hundredth Congress, as introduced Dec. 11, 1987, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 100–202.

#### Amendments

1989—Pub. L. 101–240 struck out at end "Reports with respect to the Agency under paragraphs (5) and (6) of section 286b(b) of this title shall be included in the reports made thereunder after the United States accepts membership in the Agency."
### §9123. Consultations with foreign governments

As soon as practicable after the Secretary of State makes a determination under section 9121 of this title in response to a failure to resolve unresolved abduction cases or the Secretary takes an action under subsection (d) or (e) of section 9122 of this title, based on a pattern of noncompliance, the Secretary shall request consultations with the government of such country regarding the situation giving rise to such determination.

(Pub. L. 113–150, title II, §203, Aug. 8, 2014, 128 Stat. 1820.)
Exhibit 10.1


 


BRAINSTORM CELL
THERAPEUTICS INC.


  


AMENDMENT NO. 2



TO 


2014 STOCK INCENTIVE
PLAN


  


The 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (the
 “Plan”) of Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is hereby amended
by this AMENDMENT NO. 2 as follows:


 


Section 4(a)(1) of the Plan is hereby
deleted in its entirety and a new Section 4(a)(1) is inserted in lieu thereof which shall read as follows:


 


“(1). Authorized
Number of Shares. Subject to adjustment under Section 7, Awards may be made under the Plan for up to 4,000,000 shares (which
number reflects any stock split or reverse stock split prior to the date of its adoption, and which number shall be automatically
adjusted after the date of its adoption in accordance with Section 7(a) below) of common stock, $0.00005 par value per share, of
the Company (the “Common Stock”), any or all of which Awards may be in the form of Incentive Stock Options (as defined
in Section 5(b)). Shares issued under the Plan may consist in whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares.”


 


Except as set forth above, the remainder
of the Plan remains in full force and effect.


  


**********


  


Adopted by the Board of Directors of
the Company: October 3, 2018.


 


Adopted by the Stockholders of the Company:
November 29, 2018.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Techprecision Corporation
      (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Reindl,
      the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Mary Desmond, the Chief Financial Officer,
      of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
      and belief that:




(1)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






June
      23,
      2008




/s/
      James
      G. Reindl


James
      G.
      Reindl


Chief
      Executive Officer






/s/
      Mary
      Desmond


Mary
      Desmond


Chief
      Financial Officer
#### Azucena Daza LUNTAO; Eduardo Daniel Luntao, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-75559.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*235Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 21, 2006.

Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Offices Of Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Michael S. Lahr, Esq., Helena, MT, David Y. Bernal, Attorney, Anthony C. Payne, Esq., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Azucena Daza Luntao and her husband Eduardo Daniel Luntao, natives and citizens of the Philippines, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of the Immigration Judge’s denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of deportation, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Reviewing legal questions de novo and factual findings under the substantial evidence standard, *see Cruz-Navarro v. INS,*232 F.3d 1024, 1028 (9th Cir.2000), we deny the petition.

The record does not compel a finding of past persecution, or a well-founded fear of future persecution, on account of an enumerated ground. Therefore, substantial evidence supports the IJ’s denial of the Luntaos’ asylum and withholding of deportation claims. *Id.*at 1029-31.

Nor does the record compel the conclusion that it is more likely than not that the Luntaos would be tortured if returned to the Philippines, and they are therefore ineligible for CAT relief. *See Singh v. Ashcroft,*351 F.3d 435, 443 (9th Cir .2003).

Pursuant to *Elian v. Ashcroft,*370 F.3d 897 (9th Cir.2004), the Luntaos’ voluntary *236departure period will recommence upon issuance of this court’s mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, M. Kirk Scott, as Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, as amended, for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 21, 2013



/s/ M. KIRK SCOTTName:

M. Kirk ScottTitle:

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       17
<page>

	EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund II L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.






By: /s/ Walter Davis

Name:   Walter Davis
Title:  President of Demeter Management Corporation,
		   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   August 14, 2008
<Page>

                                   Exhibit 99.2

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intrusion Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay R. Widdig, Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



/s/ Jay R. Widdig
-----------------
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
August 2, 2002
















                                       27
### §3822. Foreign vessels

With respect to a foreign vessel of a country which has inspection laws approximating those of the United States, any such vessel having an unexpired certificate of inspection duly issued by the authorities of such country shall not be subject to an inspection other than that necessary to determine whether the vessel, its boilers, and its lifesaving equipment are as stated in the certificate of inspection. A certificate of inspection may not be accepted as evidence of lawful inspection under this section unless similar privileges are granted to vessels of the United States under the laws of the country to which the vessel belongs.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1812, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 493.)
#### Zoha Douglass, Doing Business as Stephen A. Douglass Company, v. Pedro J. Smith et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       16
# Table F1
§ 664.460 What are work experiences for youth? ( a ) Work experiences are planned, structured learning experiences that take place in a workplace for a limited period of time. As provided in WIA section 129(c)(2)(D) and § 664.470, work experiences may be paid or unpaid.
( b ) Work experience workplaces may be in the private, for-profit sector; the non-profit sector; or the public sector.
( c ) Work experiences are designed to enable youth to gain exposure to the working world and its requirements. Work experiences are appropriate and desirable activities for many youth throughout the year. Work experiences should help youth acquire the personal attributes, knowledge, and skills needed to obtain a job and advance in employment. The purpose is to provide the youth participant with the opportunities for career exploration and skill development and is not to benefit the employer, although the employer may, in fact, benefit from the activities performed by the youth. Work experiences may be subsidized or unsubsidized and may include the following elements: ( 1 ) Instruction in employability skills or generic workplace skills such as those identified by the Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS);
( 2 ) Exposure to various aspects of an industry;
( 3 ) Progressively more complex tasks;
( 4 ) Internships and job shadowing;
( 5 ) The integration of basic academic skills into work activities;
( 6 ) Supported work, work adjustment, and other transition activities;
( 7 ) Entrepreneurship;
( 8 ) Service learning;
( 9 ) Paid and unpaid community service; and
( 10 ) Other elements designed to achieve the goals of work experiences.
( d ) In most cases, on-the-job training is not an appropriate work experiences activity for youth participants under age 18. Local program operators may choose, however, to use this service strategy for eligible youth when it is appropriate based on the needs identified by the objective assessment of an individual youth participant. (WIA sec. 129(c)(2)(D).)
ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 05-14-01546-CR OFFENSE: 29.03

Troy Lee Perkins v. The State of

STYLE: Texas COUNTY: Dallas

VWI5

COA DISPOSITION: DISMISSED TRIAL COURT: 282nd Judicial District Court

DATE: 12/10/2014 Publish: NO TC CASE #: F-0771970-S

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Troy Lee Perkins v. The State of

STYLE: Texas CCA#:

oe*> -is

obi*/*

PRO SE. Petition CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: DATE:

%&&#*!> . JUDGE:

DATE: O^f^sl^tr SIGNED: PC:

JUDGE: f[e^ UasU^-~ PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
### §283ee. Federal Reserve banks as depositories

Any Federal Reserve bank which is requested to do so by the Corporation shall act as its depository or as its fiscal agent, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall supervise and direct the carrying out of these functions by the Federal Reserve banks.

(Pub. L. 98–473, title I, §101(1) [title I], Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 1884, 1885.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section is based on section 206 of title II of S. 2416, Ninety-eighth Congress, as introduced Mar. 13, 1984, and enacted into law by Pub. L. 98–473.