alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      26,242,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,504,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                   444,815
<INVENTORY>                                    287,572
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,599,395
<PP&E>                                       1,922,761
<DEPRECIATION>                                 668,014
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,936,446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,561,144
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       145,987
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,182,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,936,446
<SALES>                                      3,503,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,503,077
<CGS>                                          662,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  662,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,789,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (68,071)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                118,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            118,960
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   118,960
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 80 (Tuesday, April 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 23276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
in Weaverville, California. The committee is authorized under the 
Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-
343) (the Act) and operates in compliance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act. The purpose of the committee is to improve collaborative 
relationships and to provide advice and recommendations to the Forest 
Service concerning projects and funding consistent with Title II of the 
Act. The meeting is open to the public. The purpose of the meeting is 
to review and consider a YCC project from Six Rivers National Forest 
that missed the submission deadline last year. The RAC committee will 
also be establishing a timeline for the upcoming year.

DATES: The meeting will be held Monday, May 16 at 6:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Trinity County Office of 
Education, 201 Memorial Drive, Weaverville, California 96093. Written 
comments may be submitted as described under Supplementary Information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Harmon, Designated Federal 
Official, at (530) 226-2595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b4d0dcd5c6d9dbdaf4d2c79ad2d1d09ac1c7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92f6faf3e0fffdfcd2f4e1bcf4f7f6bce7e1">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) 
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through 
Friday. Requests for reasonable accomodation for access to the facility 
or procedings may be made by contacting the person listed For Further 
Information.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Public 
input sessions will be provided and individuals will have the 
opportunity to address the Trinity County Resource Advisory Committee.

    Dated: April 14, 2011.
J. Sharon Heywood,
Forest Supervisor, Shasta-Trinity National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2011-9999 Filed 4-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David VEGA-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41151.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided July 13, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, and Michael L. Herman, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District *390of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David Vega-Hernandez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez*Torres *v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §3952. Diplomatic and consular missions

#### (a) Recommendations by Secretary of State; appointment by President; vice consul; performance of official functions under commission

The Secretary of State may recommend to the President that a member of the Service who is a citizen of the United States be commissioned as a diplomatic or consular officer or both. The President may, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, commission such member of the Service as a diplomatic or consular officer or both. The Secretary of State may commission as a vice consul a member of the Service who is a citizen of the United States. All official functions performed by a diplomatic or consular officer, including a vice consul, shall be performed under such a commission.

#### (b) Function of commissioned Service members

Members of the Service commissioned under this section may, in accordance with their commissions, perform any function which any category of diplomatic officer (other than a chief of mission) or consular officer is authorized by law to perform.

#### (c) Limits of consular districts

The Secretary of State shall define the limits of consular districts.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §312, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2087.)
----

----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Sanjay Sabnani                         Sanjay SabnaniChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)July 7, 2010 |   |   |   |

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Kevin E. BensonName:
    Kevin E. BensonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Jeffrey W. SandersName:
    Jeffrey W. SandersTitle:
    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                      Edudata Corporation and Subsidiaries
     For the Thirteen Week and Twenty Six Week Periods Ended August 31, 1996




                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NET INCOME PER SHARE WAS                                     Thirteen Weeks  Twenty Six Weeks
CALCULATED AS FOLLOWS:                                       --------------  ----------------
<S>                                                            <C>              <C>       
Primary:

Net Income (loss)                                              $   75,723       $   35,733

Weighted average common shares outstanding                      8,746,900        8,288,479

Incremental shares under stock options computed
 under the treasury stock method using the average
 market price of the issuer's commons stock during
 the period                                                       302,821          276,058

Net income (loss) per share                                    $      .01       $      .00

Fully diluted:

Net income (loss)                                              $   75,723       $   35,733

Weighted average common shares outstanding                      9,049,721        8,564,536

Incremental shares under stock options computed under
the treasury stock method using the market price of the
issuer's common stock at the end of the period of higher
than the average market price                                     307,407          307,407

Weighted average common and common equivalent
shares outstanding                                              9,054,307        8,595,886

Net Income (loss) per share                                    $      .01       $      .00
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.32


                     TRISTAR CORPORATION STOCK OPTION PLAN
                                   INCENTIVE
                             STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

         Under the terms and conditions of the Amended and Restated Stock
Option Plan (the "Plan") of TRISTAR CORPORATION (the "Company"), a copy of
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, the company
hereby grants to Peter L. Liman an option to purchase up to 75,000 shares of
Common Stock, $.01 par value ("Common Stock"), of the Company at an exercise
price equal to $6.875 per share of Common Stock, subject to adjustment as
provided in the Plan.

         This option shall be for a term commencing on the date hereof and
ending ten (10) years from the date hereof. This option is also subject to
termination as provided in the Plan. This option shall be exercisable at the
rate and in the following manner:

              One-third of the shares of Common Stock covered by this option
              shall vest and become exercisable on January 8, 1997, January 8,
              1998 and January 8, 1999.

         This option is an incentive stock option which is intended to be
governed by Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In
accepting this option, the undersigned optionee accepts and agrees to be bound
by all the terms and conditions of the Plan.

         Dated the 27th day of January, 1997.



                                        TRISTAR CORPORATION
                                      
                                      
                                      
                                        By:
                                           --------------------------
                                           Viren S. Sheth
                                           President & Chief Executive Officer


ACCEPTED:



------------------------------
         Peter L. Liman

------------------------------
         Date
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 76 (Wednesday, April 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 22171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, June 14, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, June 14, 2011, at 
2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Ms. Knispel. For more information please contact Ms. 
Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write TAP Office, 10 
MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post 
comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: April 15, 2011.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2011-9602 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.582 Review within SSA that an overpayment is past due and legally enforceable. ( a ) *Notification by overpaid individual.* An overpaid individual who receives a notice as described in § 416.581 of this subpart has the right to present evidence that all or part of the overpayment is not past due or not legally enforceable. To exercise this right, the individual must notify us and present evidence regarding the overpayment within 60 calendar days from the date of our notice.
( b ) *Submission of evidence.* The overpaid individual may submit evidence showing that all or part of the debt is not past due or not legally enforceable as provided in paragraph (a) of this section. Failure to submit the notification and evidence within 60 calendar days will result in referral of the overpayment to the Department of the Treasury, unless the overpaid individual, within this 60-day time period, has asked us to waive collection of the overpayment under section 1631(b)(1)(B) of the Act and we have not yet determined whether we can grant the waiver request. If the overpaid individual asks us to waive collection of the overpayment, we may ask that evidence to support the request be submitted to us.
( c ) *Review of the evidence.* After a timely submission of evidence by the overpaid individual, we will consider all available evidence related to the overpayment. We will make findings based on a review of the written record, unless we determine that the question of indebtedness cannot be resolved by a review of the documentary evidence.
[62 FR 49439, Sept. 22, 1997]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Number DA 19-0731

State of Montana,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

-vsTravis Michael Staker,

Defendant and Appellant.

Order – Granting Leave for MTACDL to Participate as Amicus Curiae

The Montana Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

(MTACDL) has filed an unopposed motion for leave to participate and

file an amicus brief in this Matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED that MTACDL’s request for leave to file an

amicus brief is GRANTED. MTACDL is directed to file and serve its

amicus brief within 2 days of the issuance of this Order.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 7 2020

05/07/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0731
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kevin Rich, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC,
the Managing Owner of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                        
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 29, 2008 |  | /s/ Kevin Rich                                         
|                        |  | Kevin Rich                                             
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
§ 641.365 How must the equitable distribution provisions be reconciled with the provision that disruptions to current participants should be avoided? ( a ) Governors, or highest government officials, must describe in the State Plan the steps that are being taken to comply with the statutory requirement to avoid disruptions in the provision of services for participants. (OAA sec. 503(a)(7).)
( b ) When there is new Census or other reliable data indicating that there has been a shift in the location of the eligible population or when there is over-enrollment for any other reason, the Department recommends a gradual shift in positions as they become vacant to areas where there has been an increase in the eligible population.
( c ) The Department does not define disruptions to mean that participants are entitled to remain in a subsidized community service assignment indefinitely. As discussed in § 641.570, there is a time limit on SCSEP participation, thus permitting positions to be transferred over time.
( d ) Grantees and sub-recipients must not transfer positions from one geographic area to another without first notifying the State agency responsible for preparing the State Plan and equitable distribution report.
( e ) Grantees must submit, in writing, any proposed changes in distribution that occur after submission of the equitable distribution report to the Department for approval.
( f ) All grantees are required to coordinate any proposed changes in position distribution with the other grantees in the State, including the State project director, before submitting the proposed changes to the Department for approval. The request for the Department's approval must include the comments of the State project director, which the Department will consider in making its decision.
[75 FR 53812, Sept. 1, 2010, as amended at 82 FR 56882, Dec. 1, 2017]
### §290o. Acceptance of membership

The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the Bank for Economic Cooperation and Development in the Middle East and North Africa (in this subchapter referred to as the "Bank") provided for by the agreement establishing the Bank (in this subchapter referred to as the "Agreement"), signed on May 31, 1996.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title VII, §702], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–179.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this title", meaning title I, §101(c) [title VII], of div. A of Pub. L. 104–208, Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–179, which is classified principally to this subchapter. For complete classification of title I, §101(c) [title VII], to the Code, see Short Title note below and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title VII, §701], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 2009–179, provided that: "This title [enacting this subchapter and amending sections 262r and 276c–2 of this title and section 24 of Title 12, Banks and Banking] may be cited as the 'Bank for Economic Cooperation and Development in the Middle East and North Africa Act'."
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2035 Optional supplementation: Additional State options. ( a ) *Residency requirement.* A State or political subdivision may impose, as a condition of eligibility, a residency requirement which excludes from eligibility for State supplementary payment any individual who has resided in such State (or political subdivision thereof) for less than a minimum period prescribed by the State. Any such residency requirement will be specified in the agreement.
( b ) *Lien and relative responsibility.* A State which elects Federal administration of its supplementary payments may place a lien upon property of an individual as a consequence of the receipt of such payments or may require that a relative of the individual contribute to a reasonable extent to the support of the individual, providing it is stated in the agreement that: ( 1 ) The Commissioner has determined that the specific State laws and their enforcement are consistent with the supplemental security income program purpose of providing unencumbered cash payments to recipients; and
( 2 ) The Federal Government is not involved in the administration of such laws and will not vary the State supplementary payment amount it makes to comply with such laws; and
( 3 ) Neither the basic Federal benefit nor any part of the State supplementary payment financed by Federal funds will be subject to the liens or encumbrances of such laws.
[40 FR 7640, Feb. 21, 1975, as amended at 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997]