alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012186EN.01000801.xml

| 26.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/8

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2012/C 186/06

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ferro-silicon | People's Republic of China, Egypt, Kazakhstan and Russia | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 (OJ L 55, 28.2.2008, p. 6) as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1297/2009 (OJ L 351, 30.12.2009, p. 1) | 1.3.2013 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Ferro-silicon

People's Republic of China, Egypt, Kazakhstan and Russia

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 172/2008 (OJ L 55, 28.2.2008, p. 6) as amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1297/2009 (OJ L 351, 30.12.2009, p. 1)

1.3.2013

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 1,402

 826

 817

 587

 607

 822

 986

 929

 1,178

 1,421

 1,308

 600

 374

 750

 502

 425

 396

 502

 1,149

 1,488

 1,699

 2,057

 1,717

 1,417

 1,226

 1,331

 1,110

 1,181

 1,948

 1,612

 197

 188

 186

 180

 182

 177

 181

 182

 184

 186

 189

 183

 179

 186

 186

 186

 186

 188

 189

 190

 190

 189

 193

 194

 194

 194

 195

 195

 197

 196

 439

 297

 286

 237

 238

 261

 286

 296

 338

 412

 409

 269

 231

 247

 223

 211

 210

 229

 307

 356

 412

 501

 404

 386

 341

 360

 383

 437

 431

 422

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2020 Federally administered supplementary payments. ( a ) *Payment procedures.* A federally administered State supplementary payment will be made on a monthly basis and will be included in the same check as a Federal benefit that is payable. A State supplementary payment shall be for the same month as the Federal benefit.
( b ) *Maximum amount.* There is no restriction on the amount of a State supplementary payment that the Federal Government will administer on behalf of a State.
( c ) *Minimum amount.* The Federal Government will not administer optional State supplementary payments in amounts less than $1 per month. Hence, optional supplementary payment amounts of less than $1 will be raised to a dollar.
( d ) *Optional supplementation: nine categories possible.* A State may elect Federal administration of its supplementary payments for up to nine categories, depending on the assistance titles in effect in that State in January 1972 (*i.e.*, title I, X, XIV, or XVI). It can have no more than two categories (one for individuals and one for couples) for each title in effect for January 1972: ( 1 ) Since a State with a title XVI program had just the one title in effect, it can supplement only to two categories, the individual (aged, blind, or disabled), the couple (both of whom are aged, blind, or disabled).
( 2 ) Other States could supplement up to nine categories, depending on the plans they had in effect. Six of these categories would be for: ( i ) Aged Individual,
( ii ) Aged Couple,
( iii ) Blind Individual,
( iv ) Blind Couple,
( v ) Disabled Individual,
( vi ) Disabled Couple.
( 3 ) In addition to those enumerated in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, there are three additional couple categories for which a State may elect to provide a federally administered supplement. These categories are created when one individual in the couple is: ( i ) Aged and the other blind, or
( ii ) Aged and the other disabled, or
( iii ) Blind and the other disabled.
[40 FR 7640, Feb. 21, 1975, as amended at 50 FR 48579, Nov. 26, 1985]
#### § 404.961 Prehearing and posthearing conferences.

The administrative law judge may decide on his or her own, or at the request of any party to the hearing, to hold a prehearing or posthearing conference to facilitate the hearing or the hearing decision. The administrative law judge shall tell the parties of the time, place and purpose of the conference at least seven days before the conference date, unless the parties have indicated in writing that they do not wish to receive a written notice of the conference. At the conference, the administrative law judge may consider matters in addition to those stated in the notice, if the parties consent in writing. A record of the conference will be made. The administrative law judge shall issue an order stating all agreements and actions resulting from the conference. If the parties do not object, the agreements and actions become part of the hearing record and are binding on all parties.
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements:




(1)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-146463),


(2)Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-155692),


(3)
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-156371) pertaining to the 2007
Long-Term Incentive Compensation Plan,


(4)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-156997),


(5)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-124712), and


(6)
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-161587),




of
PharmAthene, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated March 26,
2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PharmAthene,
Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K). for the year ended December
31, 2009.








/s/
      Ernst & Young LLP




McLean,
Virginia


March 26,
2010
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		May 17, 2004
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned, Ross A. Grieve, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gordon D. Maron, Vice President, Secretary/Treasurer, of PCL Employees Holdings Ltd. (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



|(i) | the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: January 25, 2008

/s/ ROSS A. GRIEVERoss A. GrievePresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ GORDON D. MARONGordon D. MaronVice President, Secretary/Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to PCL Employees Holdings Ltd. and will be retained by PCL Employees Holdings Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of John G. Best et al. against City of New York et al.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.
### SERVED: APRIL 15, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

In.The Matter Of: GLOBAL AIRCRAFT INTERIORS, INC. Respondent ) ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0324

CaseNo. 2013EA110043

NOTICE OF HEARING LOCATION OnNovember 24, 2014, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed, whichnoted that the location ofthe Hearing would be provided by separate Notice to theparties. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Hearing in this case, set to begin onJune 23, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., will be held at the following location: United States Tax Court Jacob K Javits Federal Building Courtroom 208 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278 The Hearingbegins at 9:00a.m. Eastern Standard Time. Please allow time to pass . through security. Briefcases, purses, packages, and the like will be x-rayed. All-individuals must present government issued identification to enter the courthouse.

Attachment: Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001

Mr. 

### Zachary M. Berman Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

### 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FPC(: 718-995-5699 Mr. 

### Sande E. Lichtenstein Respondent's Counsel 

### Lichtenstein & 

### Schindel 158 West Boston PostRoad P.O. Box 787 Mamaroneck, NY 10543 TEL: 914-698-3313 FAX: 914-698-3478 Judge J.E. Sullivan US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FPCX: 202-366-7536 ONE COPY 

### DocketNo. FAA-2014-0324 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building__.:Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin Perry, Chief Financial
Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		August 16, 2004
### SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL DEFENSE ACQUISITION FUND
**EXHIBIT      32.1 **

**OFFICER’S      SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

|   | (i) | The                Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the nine months ended                September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section                13(a)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,                and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | The                information contained in the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for                the nine months ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents in all                material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company, at and for the periods                indicated. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 14, 2005 | /s/                Steven A. Abney              |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Steven                A. Abney                                      |
|                                   | Executive                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                   | (Principal                Financial and Accounting Officer and      |
|                                   | Acting                Principal Executive Officer)                  |
#### § 411.380 What does a State VR agency do if the State VR agency wants to determine whether a person seeking services has a ticket?

A State VR agency can contact the Program Manager (PM) to determine if a person seeking VR services has a ticket and, if so, whether the ticket may be assigned to the State VR agency (see § 411.140) or reassigned to the State VR agency (see § 411.150). (See § 411.115(k) for a definition of the PM.)
CERTIFICATIONS



I, David Downes, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sure Trace Security Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and



6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: December 22, 2004

/s/ David Downes

David Downes

President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo RINCON-GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-41531.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided July 13, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Margaret Christina Ling, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Michael L. Herman, Federal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

*370PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Alfredo Rincon-Garza raises arguments that are foreclosed by *AlmendarezTorres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
### §276cc. Acceptance of funds and property from other sources; limitation; disbursement and investment

The board is also authorized to accept, receive, hold, and administer gifts, bequests and devises of money, securities, or other property, whether real or personal, from any source, for the benefit of the Kermit Roosevelt fund, but no such gift, bequest, or devise which entails any expenditure not to be met out of the gift, bequest, devise, or the income thereof shall be accepted without the consent of Congress. Such additional sums or property shall be receipted for by the Chief of Finance and may, at the discretion of the board and unless otherwise restricted by the terms of the gift, bequest, or devise, be administered and disbursed in the same manner as the original corpus of the fund and the income therefrom. The board may in its discretion sell or exchange securities or other property given, bequeathed, or devised to or for the benefit of the Kermit Roosevelt fund, and may invest and reinvest the proceeds thereof, together with any other moneys in the fund, in such investments as it may determine from time to time: Provided, however, That the board is not authorized to engage in any business, nor shall it make any investments for the account of the fund which could not lawfully be made by a trust company in the District of Columbia, except that it may make any investment directly authorized by the instrument of gift, bequest, or devise under which the funds to be invested are derived, and may retain any investments accepted by it.

(July 2, 1945, ch. 228, §3, 59 Stat. 317.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 226 of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.
#### § 404.420 Persons deemed entitled to benefits based on an individual's earnings record.

For purposes of imposing deductions under the annual earnings test (see § 404.415) and the foreign work test (see § 404.417), a person who is married to an old-age insurance beneficiary and who is entitled to a mother's or father's insurance benefit or a child's insurance benefit based on the child's disability (and all these benefits are based on the earnings record of some third person) is deemed entitled to such benefit based on the earnings record of the old-age insurance beneficiary to whom he or she is married. This section is effective for months in any taxable year of the old-age insurance beneficiary that begins after August 1958.

[49 FR 24117, June 12, 1984]
8 /08 MI

- 252 SC 

### REPUBLIC OF THE MARSHALL ISLANDS

Office of the Maritime Administrator



### TYPE APPROVAL CERTIFICATE OF

BALLAST WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

This is to certify that the Ballast Water Management System listed below has been examined and

tested in accordance w ith the requirements of the specifications contained in the Guidelines

contained in IMO resolution MEPC.125(53). This certificate is valid only for the Ballast Water

Management System referred to below.

Ballast Water Management System supplied by or unde r license from NEI Treatment Systems,

LLC

Under type and model designation VOS

- 2500

- 101 and incorporating:

Ballast Water Management System manufactured by or under license from NEI Treatment

Systems, LL C

To equi pment/assembly drawing No

. : 07

- 2500

- 101 Date: 29 August 2007

Equipment Serial Number (s) :

Other equipment manufactured by: N/A

To equipment/assembly drawing No

. : N/A Date: N/A

Equipment Serial Number (s) :

Treatment Rated Capacity: 2,500 m 3 /h

Installed Ab oard IMO Vessel Number:

A copy of this Type Approval Certificate should be carried on board a vessel fitted with this

Ballast Water Management System at all times. A reference to the test protocol and a copy of

the test results shoul d be available for inspection on board the vessel.

No limiting conditions are imposed.

Dated this 2nd of September

, 2008

.