alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.1316 Job Service Complaint System; enforcement of work contracts. ( a ) Complaints arising under this subpart may be filed through the Job Service Complaint System, as described in 20 CFR part 658, Subpart E. Complaints which involve worker contracts must be referred by the SWA to ESA for appropriate handling and resolution, as described in 29 CFR part 501. As part of this process, ESA may report the results of its investigation to the Administrator, OFLC for consideration of employer penalties or such other action as may be appropriate.
( b ) Complaints alleging that an employer discouraged an eligible U.S. worker from applying, failed to hire, discharged, or otherwise discriminated against an eligible U.S. worker, or discovered violations involving the same, may be referred to the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Office of Special Counsel for Unfair Immigration Related Employment Practices (OSC), in addition to any activity, investigation, and/or enforcement action taken by ETA or an SWA. Likewise, if OSC becomes aware of a violation of these regulations, it may provide such information to the appropriate SWA and the CO.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6548

MICHAEL BURNS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GARY MAYNARD, Director South Carolina

Department of Corrections; CHARLES CONDON,

Attorney General of the State of South

Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.

(CA-02-1263)

Submitted: July 18, 2003 Decided: August 18, 2003

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Burns, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Burns, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find both that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.), cert. denied,

534 U.S. 941 (2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Burns has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bruce Winfield, Chief Executive Officer of Portal Resources Ltd.. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: December 23, 2006





/s/  Bruce Winfield

Bruce Winfield, Chief Executive Officer













#
§ 404.373 Parent's benefit amounts. Your parent's monthly benefit before any reduction that may be made as explained in § 404.304, is figured in one of the following ways: ( a ) *One parent entitled.* Your parent's monthly benefit is equal to 821 ⁄ 2 percent of the insured person's primary insurance amount if you are the only parent entitled to benefits on his or her earnings record.
( b ) *More than one parent entitled.* Your parent's monthly benefit is equal to 75 percent of the insured person's primary insurance amount if there is another parent entitled to benefits on his or her earnings record.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY HIGH

 378

 350

 333

 331

 313

 310

 312

 323

 338

 326

 346

 320

 294

 255

 224

 221

 217

 214

 209

 208

 213

 224

 217

 220

 227

 223

 220

 209

 184

 188

 200

 202

 209

 193

 209

 192

 195

 189

 193

 181

 133

 114

 121

 117

 128

 140

 158

 164

 165

 176

 172

 172

 177

 166

 144

 126

 291

 281

 275

 273

 276

 272

 263

 259

 260

 259

 271

 249

 226

 192

 181

 182

 185

 188

 193

 192

 195

 200

 199

 200

 208

 204

 197

 183

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: March 8, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### In the Matter of Lawyers Title and Guaranty Company (20-24 Van Dam St. and 233-245 Spring St., New York City- Mortgage No. 408,119, Certificate No. 447). Alfred J. Callahan, as Trustee, et al., Respondents; Anton Gronich, as Trustee under the Will of Benjamin Hirsch, Deceased, Appellant.

Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each undersigned officer of NYSE Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that, to such officer's knowledge,
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|Date: March 31, 2006 | /s/JOHN A. THAINJohn A. Thain Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2006 | /s/NELSON CHAINelson Chai Chief Financial Officer    

The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
### §4201. Fees for certification of invoices

Fees for the consular certification of invoices shall be, and they are, included with the fees for official services for which the President is authorized by section 4219 of this title to prescribe rates or tariffs.

(Apr. 5, 1906, ch. 1366, §9, 34 Stat. 101.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

A further provision of section 9 of act Apr. 5, 1906, repealed R.S. §2851, which provided for certification of invoices of imported merchandise by the collector of the post, and R.S. §1721, which prescribed a fee of one dollar to be charged by the consul-general for the British North American provinces, for certifying invoices of goods not exceeding $100 in value.

Section was formerly classified to section 1181 of this title, and prior thereto to section 84 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 956.40

 956.06

 955.70

 955.34

 954.91

 954.45

 953.96

 953.56

 953.12

 952.78

 952.40

 951.86

 951.50

 950.96

 950.48

 950.11

 949.91

 949.64

 949.26

 948.84

 948.42

 947.97

 947.64

 947.15

 946.75

 946.41

 946.03

 945.66

 945.27

 944.96

 944.54

 1,984.5

 1,978.7

 1,972.5

 1,966.4

 1,959.1

 1,951.3

 1,943.0

 1,936.3

 1,928.9

 1,923.2

 1,916.8

 1,907.8

 1,901.8

 1,892.9

 1,884.9

 1,878.8

 1,875.5

 1,871.1

 1,864.8

 1,858.0

 1,851.1

 1,843.8

 1,838.4

 1,830.5

 1,824.0

 1,818.5

 1,812.4

 1,806.5

 1,800.2

 1,795.2

 1,788.6

STORAGE

-5.8

-5.8

-6.1

-6.1

-7.3

-7.8

-8.3

-6.7

-7.4

-5.7

-6.4

-9.0

-6.0

-9.0

-7.9

-6.1

-3.3

-4.4

-6.2

-6.9

-6.9

-7.3

-5.4

-7.9

-6.5

-5.5

-6.1

-5.9

-6.2

-5.0

-6.7

CHANGE

 2,547

 2,700

 2,693

 2,311

 1,839

 1,597

 1,356

 2,202

 1,748

 2,301

 2,271

 720

 2,499

 2,030

 2,073

 2,347

 3,945

 2,560

 2,405

 1,819

 2,308

 2,093

 2,140

 2,172

 2,289

 2,645

 1,733

 2,620

 2,485

 2,534

 2,098

INFLOW

 5,313

 5,472

 5,693

 5,187

 5,313

 5,409

 5,397

 5,423

 5,333

 5,031

 5,347

 5,104

 5,350

 6,369

 5,953

 5,259

 5,388

 4,632

 5,368

 5,149

 5,635

 5,648

 4,695

 5,993

 5,381

 5,276

 4,655

 5,445

 5,494

 4,918

 5,343

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 171

 166

 95

 215

 214

 114

 139

 173

 148

 143

 128

 162

 166

 185

 117

 170

 218

 164

 183

 140

 130

 148

 143

 186

 166

 133

 166

 165

 141

 118

 127

C.F.S.

 .34

 .33

 .19

 .43

 .43

 .23

 .28

 .35

 .30

 .29

 .26

 .33

 .34

 .38

 .24

 .35

 .45

 .34

 .38

 .29

 .27

 .31

 .30

 .39

 .35

 .28

 .35

 .35

 .30

 .25

 .27

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .50

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2015 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 10, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -201.6 69,080 165,973 0 0 4,834 9.95 .52

ACRE-FEET -201,600 137,020 329,207 0 0 9,588

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 329,207

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 329,207

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .52

JULY 1, 2015 .93

 1,990.3

Table 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 129

 136

 131

 142

 120

 122

 120

 132

 139

 140

 113

 120

 144

 145

 188

 223

 233

 223

 215

 202

 219

 234

 263

 298

 289

 249

 285

 309

 311

 272

 268

 96

 97

 94

 96

 91

 100

 93

 97

 95

 94

 91

 93

 98

 95

 84

 155

 158

 158

 155

 155

 157

 160

 164

 168

 168

 170

 171

 176

 171

 174

 173

 111

 109

 110

 110

 107

 108

 106

 108

 107

 106

 102

 108

 112

 113

 129

 175

 178

 182

 179

 175

 178

 188

 193

 200

 198

 201

 210

 218

 213

 211

 208

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-062:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey D. Hahn,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:	  /s/	Jeffrey D. Hahn

Name:		Jeffrey D. Hahn
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		November 14, 2003
### Part X—Development Fund for Africa

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior part X, consisting of sections 2293 and 2294, related to assistance to Portugal and Portuguese colonies in Africa gaining independence, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 99–83, title XII, §1211(a)(4), Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 279.
Bear Creek

Caribou City

Toponce

Stump Creek

Meade Peak

Oxford Mountain

Worm Creek

Elkhorn Mountain

Mount Naomi

Soda Point

Paris Peak

Liberty Creek

Gibson

Dry Ridge

Sage Creek

Mink Creek

West Mink

Bonneville Peak

Red Mountain

Hell Hole

Station Creek

Sherman Peak

Deep Creek

Stauffer Creek

Gannett-Spring Creek

Huckleberry Basin

Scout Mountain

North Pebble

Schmid Peak

Clarkston Mountain

Pole Creek

Swan Creek Mountain

W Telephone Draw illiams Creek

§ ̈¦15

§ ̈¦86

£¤30

£¤91

£¤26

£¤89

£¤191

£¤20

£¤61

£¤30

£¤26

£¤91

£¤26

£¤91

£¤89

£¤191

¬«37

¬«34

¬«36

¬«39

¬«31

¬«89

¬«40

¬«34

¬«34

¬«36

¬«36

¬«34

Ovid

Gray

Bone

Lund

Paris

Niter

Grace

Conda

Henry

Wayan

Irwin

Tyhee

Firth

Ammon

Arimo

Robin

Hatch

Inkom

Arbon

Geneva

Dingle

Sharon

Nounan

Banida

Oxford

Downey

Turner

Pegram

Weston

Dayton

Raymond

Freedom

Shelley

Lincoln

Daniels

Crystal

Whitney

Preston

Clifton

Samaria

Thatcher

Chubbuck

Swanlake

McCammon

Bancroft

Fairview Franklin Woodruff

Gwenford

Rockford

Cleveland

Palisades

Fort Hall

Blackfoot

Pocatello

Mink Creek

Bennington

Georgetown

Malad City

Fish Haven

Bloomington

Swan Valley

Idaho Falls

Chesterfield

Saint Charles

Lava Hot Springs

Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Caribou Existing Plan Management Themes

8 4 0 8 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
#### Margaret Schultz, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas Corkery, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Scott and Dowling, JJ.
#### Franklin Barry, as Limited Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Barry, Deceased, Respondent, v. Darwin J. Waterstraw, Appellant.

■ Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Harris, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a new trial on the ground that the verdict is against the weight of evidence. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Ricardo TORRES-ACOSTA, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 04-10487.

D.C. No. CR-03-02048-RCC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 22, 2006.

Bruce M. Ferg, Esq., Anne E. Mosher, Esq., USTU — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Evo A. Deconcini, U.S. Courthouse, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff — Appellee.

Brian I. Rademacher, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant — Appellant.

*538Before: D.W. NELSON, RAWLINSON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER *

The memorandum disposition filed on November 14, 2005 is amended to add the following numbered paragraph on page 3:

6. The record does not reflect that the district court was of the view that it lacked authority to grant a downward departure. In such a circumstance, we lack jurisdiction to review the denial of a downward departure. *See United, States v. Govan,*152 F.3d 1088,1095 (9th Cir.1998).

With this amendment, Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing filed on December 9, 2005, is DENIED.

No further filings will be accepted in this case.

*

 This order is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4288 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4288

To establish a multi-agency Federal team to improve and reform Federal 
                          disaster assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2015

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish a multi-agency Federal team to improve and reform Federal 
                          disaster assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FEMA Help and Education for Local 
Partners Act (FEMA HELP Act)''.

SEC. 2. MULTI-AGENCY FEDERAL DISASTER TEAM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 
Agency shall establish and convene a multi-agency Federal disaster 
assistance team to work and coordinate with State, local, tribal, and 
territorial leaders to develop a comprehensive approach to disaster 
recovery by using a full range of Federal program funding resources 
through collaboration between the Federal agencies referred to in 
subsection (b), including through program requirements, release of 
funds, and multi-agency funding opportunities.
    (b) Team Members.--The multi-agency Federal team referred to in 
subsection (a) shall be composed of representatives of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Housing and Urban 
Development, the Federal Highway Administration, the Small Business 
Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, the Department of 
Defense, and the Army Corps of Engineers, and State, local, tribal, and 
territorial governments and any other agency the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency Administrator thinks appropriate.
    (c) Coordinating Officers.--Not later than 60 days after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall ensure that every 
coordinating officer of the Federal Emergency Management Agency is 
trained in a range of applicable disaster recovery funding programs 
across the team members.
    (d) Guidelines.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Emergency 
Management Agency shall establish and publish guidelines and criteria 
for making and communicating decisions regarding funding eligibility 
and requirements for disaster recovery personnel across the team 
members.
    (e) Staff Transitions.--To the extent practicable, the Federal team 
shall minimize staff transitions and ensure that there is adequate 
information transfer if staff transitions do occur.
                                 <all>
```