alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                    ----------------------------------------
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            ---------------------------------------------------------

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  May 16, 2005



By: /S/ EDWARD C. HALL
    -----------------------
    Edward C. Hall
    Chief Financial Officer
492 P.2d 1008

#### STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alfredo VALENZUELA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 791.

Court of Appeals of New Mexico.

Dec. 22, 1971.

Walter R. Parr, Las Cruces, New Mexico, for defendant-appellant.

*392David L. Norvell, Atty. Gen., Ronald Van Amberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Santa Fe, for plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Defendant was convicted and sentenced for burglary. Section 40A-16-3, N.M.S.A. 1953 (Repl.Vol. 6). Defendant claims he did not voluntarily and understanding^ waive his constitutional right to remain silent; consequently his admissions were inadmissible at trial.

There is evidence that on arrest, the police officer read to defendant the “Miranda warnings” and the defendant stated that he understood them. His constitutional right to remain silent was not violated. His admissions could properly be found to be voluntary and were admissible at trial. State v. Pace, 80 N.M. 364, 456 P.2d 197 (1969).

Affirmed.

It is so ordered.

WOOD, C. J., and PIENDLEY, J., concur.

COWAN, J., not participating.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Space station systemstechnology study, (add-on task) final report.**
 
Volumes: One | Two | Three
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.26:171415 | NAS 1.26:171416| NAS 1.26:171417
Item Number:0830-H-14 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000940421
 
April 18, 2018
Order entered May 18, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01476 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF H .D.V.,JR. AND B.V., CHILDREN On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10 - 0 4711



### O RDER We GRANT the May 13, 2015 motion of Elizabeth Neve Griffin, Official Court Reporter for the 302nd Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be filed by JUNE 15, 2015
. /s/ ELIZ ABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Farnsworth, Appellant, against John F. Foster, as Warden of Auburn State Prison, Respondent.

— Order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur. (The order dismisses a writ of habeas corpus and remands relator to the custody of respondent.) Present— Taylor, P. J., Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
#### § 404.505 Relationship to provisions requiring deductions.

Adjustments required by any of the provisions in this subpart F are made in addition to, but after, any deductions required by section 202(t), 203(b), 203(c), 203(d), and 222(b) of the Act, or section 907 of the Social Security Act Amendments of 1939, and before any deductions required by section 203(g) or 203(h)(2) of the Act.

[34 FR 14888, Sept. 27, 1969]
#### § 408.330 How long will your application remain in effect?

Your application for SVB will remain in effect from the date it is filed until we make a final determination on it, unless there is a hearing decision on your application. If there is a hearing decision, your application will remain in effect until the hearing decision is issued.
(No. 74-CC-428

#### West Publishing Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Secretary of State, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 8, 1974.*

West Publishing Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4326 

To amend the Small Business Act to expand the duties of the Office of 

Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2016 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself and Mr. HARDY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to expand the duties 

of the Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small and Disadvan5 taged Business Enhancement Act of 2016’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANDING DUTIES OF THE OFFICE OF SMALL AND 

7 DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS UTILIZATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 15(k) of the Small Busi9 ness Act (15 U.S.C. 644(k)), as amended by section 870 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4326 IH

1 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2 2016 (Public Law 114–92), is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘section 8, 15 or 44’’ and in4 serting ‘‘section 8, 15, 31, 36, or 44’’; 

5 (2) by striking ‘‘sections 8 and 15’’ each place 

6 such term appears and inserting ‘‘sections 8, 15, 31, 

7 36, and 44’’; 

8 (3) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘section 

9 8(a)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 8, 15, 31, or 36’’; 

10 (4) by redesignating paragraphs (15), (16), and 

11 (17) as paragraphs (16), (17), and (18), respec12 tively; 

13 (5) by inserting after paragraph (14) the fol14 lowing new paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(15) shall review purchases made by the agen16 cy greater than the micro-purchase threshold defined 

17 in section 1902(a) of title 41, United States Code, 

18 and less than the simplified acquisition threshold to 

19 ensure that the purchases have been made in compli20 ance with the provisions of this Act and have been 

21 properly recorded in the Federal Procurement Data 

22 System, if the method of payment is a purchase card 

23 issued by the Department of Defense pursuant to 

24 section 2784 of title 10, United States Code, or by 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4326 IH

1 the head of an executive agency pursuant to section 

2 1909 of title 41, United States Code;’’; and 

3 (6) in paragraph (17) (as so redesignated)— 

4 (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

5 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

6 (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking the 

7 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

8 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

9 subparagraph: 

10 ‘‘(D) any failure of the agency to comply 

11 with section 8, 15, 31, or 36.’’. 

12 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 3(m) of the 

13 Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(m)) is amended to 

14 read as follows: 

15 ‘‘(m) SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD.—In 

16 this Act, the term ‘simplified acquisition threshold’ has the 

17 meaning given such term in section 134 of title 41, United 

18 States Code.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
### §2665a. Foreign Service fellowships

The Secretary of State is authorized to establish a Foreign Service fellowship program at the Department of State. The Foreign Service fellowship program shall provide a fellowship, for not less than 4 months, for academics in the area of international affairs who are members of the faculty of institutions of higher education. Such program shall give priority consideration in the award of fellowships to individuals teaching in programs in international affairs which serve significant numbers of students who are from cultural and ethnic groups which are underrepresented in the Foreign Service.

(Pub. L. 101–246, title I, §153(h), Feb. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 44.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Chester Bancorp, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,207
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           2,509
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,603
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,850
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,521
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            59,819
<LOANS>                                         47,348
<ALLOWANCE>                                        422
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,395
<DEPOSITS>                                      95,630
<SHORT-TERM>                                    14,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,020
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 131,395
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,931
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,985
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   578
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,194
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,061
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,404
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,700
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    600
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        44
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                         58
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    449
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    40
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        3
<RECOVERIES>                                       412
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Benedict Roache, Complainant, v. Harry A. Hanbury, Accused.

Motion to resettle order of March 37, 1914, granted to the extent of inserting therein, in lieu of the words “April Term, 1914,” the words “April 30th, 1914;” otherwise, motion denied. Present—Burr, Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 004

Attachment Name

DMVPCAS Client ServicesCAS Number

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 1c.

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

DMP_101 122926607598
Z9 ~~~~~ /~ 4 Or A044tJ4 ~ W 

CM ~ClienatOerv Cleis

A &Axioni of t~iAmueican Chewr"w 5ode hIaty-1-8 1473

June 24, 2010 Fi 14734

Sc~rpa conultants

ATT2I Mr. Ni~zholas SosrxVA

8 Troon DriVe

Newton, NJ 07860

Dear Mzr, scea"

Tbanik you for your client Services Search request of June 24, 2010. The CA

Index Nfames that you requested are provided on the following print*.

Please review this informationi to confirm that the substance data associated

with thee CAS Registry Iuwberv accurately reprefents your substances.

An invoice will be issued to cover the cost of the process~ing of your oider.

Thank you for the opportunity to pravIde this service. If you have apy:

questions, Please do not hesitate to contact asm at 624-"47-3870 or 800-$31-1884

between the hours of 8:00 &.M. and 4:00 P.m. Mo-ri.

Sincerely,

Debby Van'Moos.

CAS Client Services

Enclosure(IF)

1Wfl OWOWWuV Fft d Roa 5e0IN no n*.t Cef* 412104334 I'mS

SU4447 3747

Paoo2
Uf//UW 19 Od PAX b1S 44t 1(41 L;~ US *Uvu/v

14l ANSWE 2 OF 2 EBisIRY coPYRxw 2010 ACS on STSI

RN 2120-37-3 RGISTRY RHOrSTRY COPYRIGHT 2010 ACS On STU

RN 2020-37-3 REGISTRY

ED Entered STU: 16 Nov 1904

CM lE-pyratole. 3, 4-dilnethyl- (CA INDEX NAM)

OMBER CA THOE IES: cN Pyrn~ole, 3,4(or 4,5)-diuethyi- (7CI) aN Pyrazole, 3,4-dimetbyl- ('CI SCI)

CM 3, 4-flimetiwl-IE-vyrazole CN 3 ,4-DihethylPyrazole

Mr' C5SeS02

CI COlt

LC S7N Fleuis AORICOLA, EuILSTMflt. 810518, CA, CAPLtJS, CASREACT, CHSWCAT$. CKEI$T, SPECINFO, TOXCENTER, USPATI, USPATFULL

(*File contains nuerically searchable property data)

H

Me Me

"PROPERTY DATA AVAILABLE IN '751 'PRO#' FORNAT*

85 REFERECES IN FILE CA (1907 TO DATE)

I. REP'&*RNCES TO NO-SPECIFIC DERIVATIVES IN FILE CA

85 REFERENCES IN FILE CAPWUS 11901 TO DATE)

Paw~s*
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2015 11 233

2015 21 2424

2015 31 1766

2015 32 589

2015 41 4

2015 42 2

2015 43 29

2015 51 4

2015 52 132

2015 53 18

2015 54 34

2015 61 63

2015 62 78
### §4006. Other bases for promoting or increasing pay

(a) The Secretary may pursuant to a recommendation of the Foreign Service Grievance Board, an equal employment opportunity appeals examiner, or the Special Counsel of the Merit Systems Protection Board, and shall pursuant to a decision or order of the Merit Systems Protection Board—

(1) recommend to the President a promotion of a member of the Service under section 3942(a) of this title;

(2) promote a member of the Service under section 3943 of this title;

(3) grant performance pay to a member of the Senior Foreign Service under section 3965(c) of this title; or

(4) grant a within-class salary increase under section 3966 of this title to a member of the Service who is assigned to a salary class in the Foreign Service Schedule.

(b) In implementing subsection (a) of this section and in cases in which the Secretary has exercised the authority of section 4005(b) of this title, the Secretary may, in special circumstances set forth by regulation, make retroactive promotions, grant performance pay, make retroactive within-class salary increases, and recommend retroactive promotions by the President.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §606, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2096.)
§ 656.20 Audit procedures. ( a ) Review of the labor certification application may lead to an audit of the application. Additionally, certain applications may be selected randomly for audit and quality control purposes. If an application is selected for audit, the Certifying Officer shall issue an audit letter. The audit letter will: ( 1 ) State the documentation that must be submitted by the employer;
( 2 ) Specify a date, 30 days from the date of the audit letter, by which the required documentation must be submitted; and
( 3 ) Advise that if the required documentation has not been sent by the date specified the application will be denied. ( i ) Failure to provide documentation in a timely manner constitutes a refusal to exhaust available administrative remedies; and
( ii ) The administrative-judicial review procedure provided in § 656.26 is not available.
( b ) A substantial failure by the employer to provide required documentation will result in that application being denied under § 656.24 and may result in a determination by the Certifying Officer pursuant to § 656.24 to require the employer to conduct supervised recruitment under § 656.21 in future filings of labor certification applications for up to 2 years.
( c ) The Certifying Officer may in his or her discretion provide one extension, of up to 30 days, to the 30 days specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( d ) Before making a final determination in accordance with the standards in § 656.24, whether in course of an audit or otherwise, the Certifying Officer may: ( 1 ) Request supplemental information and/or documentation; or
( 2 ) Require the employer to conduct supervised recruitment under § 656.21.
[69 FR 77386, Dec. 27, 2004, as amended at 71 FR 35523, June 21, 2006]
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Annual Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2011

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Avery Pack, President and         Chief Executive Officer         (Principal Executive Officer) and         Acting Chief Financial Officer         (Principal Financial Officer and         Principal Accounting Officer) |
§ 604.6 Conformity and substantial compliance. ( a ) *In general.* A State's UC law must conform with, and the administration of its law must substantially comply with, the requirements of this regulation for purposes of certification under: ( 1 ) Section 3304(c) of the FUTA (26 U.S.C. 3304(c)), with respect to whether employers are eligible to receive credit against the Federal unemployment tax established by section 3301 of the FUTA (26 U.S.C. 3301), and
( 2 ) Section 302 of the SSA (42 U.S.C. 502), with respect to whether a State is eligible to receive Federal grants for the administration of its UC program.
( b ) *Resolving Issues of Conformity and Substantial Compliance.* For the purposes of resolving issues of conformity and substantial compliance with the requirements of this regulation, the following provisions of 20 CFR 601.5 apply: ( 1 ) Paragraph (b) of this section, pertaining to informal discussions with the Department of Labor to resolve conformity and substantial compliance issues, and
( 2 ) Paragraph (d) of this section, pertaining to the Secretary of Labor's hearing and decision on conformity and substantial compliance.
( c ) *Result of failure to conform or substantially comply* — ( 1 ) *FUTA requirements.* Whenever the Secretary of Labor, after reasonable notice and opportunity for a hearing to the State UC agency, finds that the State UC law fails to conform, or that the State or State UC agency fails to comply substantially, with the requirements of the FUTA, as implemented in this regulation, then the Secretary of Labor shall make no certification under such act to the Secretary of the Treasury for such State as of October 31 of the 12-month period for which such finding is made. Further, the Secretary of Labor must notify the Governor of the State and such State UC agency that further payments for the administration of the State UC law will not be made to the State.
( 2 ) *SSA requirements.* Whenever the Secretary of Labor, after reasonable notice and opportunity for a hearing to the State UC agency, finds that the State UC law fails to conform, or that the State or State UC agency fails to comply substantially, with the requirements of title III, SSA (42 U.S.C. 501-504), as implemented in this regulation, then the Secretary of Labor must notify the Governor of the State and such State UC agency that further payments for the administration of the State UC law will not be made to the State until the Secretary of Labor is satisfied that there is no longer any such failure. Until the Secretary of Labor is so satisfied, the Department of Labor will not make further payments to such State.