alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
        32**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 
 
 Michael
        V. Shustek, as Chief Executive Officer of Vestin Realty Mortgage I, Inc.
        (successor to Vestin Fund I, LLC) (the “Registrant”) , and John Alderfer, as
        Chief Financial Officer of Vestin Realty Mortgage I, Inc. (successor to Vestin
        Fund I, LLC), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, that
 
 (1)  the
        Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the ten month transition period ended April
        30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
        hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the applicable requirements of
        Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
        and
 
 (2)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
 
 Dated:
        June 27, 2006
 
 
 
 /s/
        Michael V. Shustek
 Michael
        V. Shustek
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 of
        Vestin
        Realty Mortgage I, Inc. (successor to Vestin Fund I, LLC)
 
 
 Dated:
        June 27, 2006
 
 
 
 /s/
        John Alderfer
 John
        Alderfer
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 of
        Vestin
        Realty Mortgage I, Inc. (successor to Vestin Fund I,
        LLC)
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.967 Physical exertion requirements. To determine the physical exertion requirements of work in the national economy, we classify jobs as *sedentary, light, medium, heavy,* and *very heavy.* These terms have the same meaning as they have in the *Dictionary of Occupational Titles,* published by the Department of Labor. In making disability determinations under this subpart, we use the following definitions: ( a ) *Sedentary work.* Sedentary work involves lifting no more than 10 pounds at a time and occasionally lifting or carrying articles like docket files, ledgers, and small tools. Although a sedentary job is defined as one which involves sitting, a certain amount of walking and standing is often necessary in carrying out job duties. Jobs are sedentary if walking and standing are required occasionally and other sedentary criteria are met.
( b ) *Light work.* Light work involves lifting no more than 20 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects weighing up to 10 pounds. Even though the weight lifted may be very little, a job is in this category when it requires a good deal of walking or standing, or when it involves sitting most of the time with some pushing and pulling of arm or leg controls. To be considered capable of performing a full or wide range of light work, you must have the ability to do substantially all of these activities. If someone can do light work, we determine that he or she can also do sedentary work, unless there are additional limiting factors such as loss of fine dexterity or inability to sit for long periods of time.
( c ) *Medium work.* Medium work involves lifting no more than 50 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects weighing up to 25 pounds. If someone can do medium work, we determine that he or she can also do sedentary and light work.
( d ) *Heavy work.* Heavy work involves lifting no more than 100 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects weighing up to 50 pounds. If someone can do heavy work, we determine that he or she can also do medium, light, and sedentary work.
( e ) *Very heavy work.* Very heavy work involves lifting objects weighing more than 100 pounds at a time with frequent lifting or carrying of objects weighing 50 pounds or more. If someone can do very heavy work, we determine that he or she can also do heavy, medium, light, and sedentary work.
§ 667.720 How do we handle a recipient's request for waiver of liability under WIA section 184(d)(2)? ( a ) A recipient may request a waiver of liability, as described in WIA section 184(d)(2), and a Grant Officer may approve such a waiver under WIA section 184(d)(3).
( b ) ( 1 ) When the debt for which a waiver of liability is desired was established in a non-Federal resolution proceeding, the resolution report must accompany the waiver request.
( 2 ) When the waiver request is made during the ETA Grant Officer resolution process, the request must be made during the informal resolution period described in § 667.510(c).
( c ) A waiver of the recipient's liability shall be considered by the Grant Officer only when: ( 1 ) The misexpenditure of WIA funds occurred at a subrecipient's level;
( 2 ) The misexpenditure was not due to willful disregard of the requirements of title I of the Act, gross negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of administration, or did not constitute fraud;
( 3 ) If fraud did exist, it was perpetrated against the recipient/subrecipients; and ( i ) The recipient/subrecipients discovered, investigated, reported, and cooperated in any prosecution of the perpetrator of the fraud; and
( ii ) After aggressive debt collection action, it has been documented that further attempts at debt collection from the perpetrator of the fraud would be inappropriate or futile;
( 4 ) The recipient has issued a final determination which disallows the misexpenditure, the recipient's appeal process has been exhausted, and a debt has been established; and
( 5 ) The recipient requests such a waiver and provides documentation to demonstrate that it has substantially complied with the requirements of section 184(d)(2) of the Act, and this section.
( d ) The recipient will not be released from liability for misspent funds under the determination required by section 184(d) of the Act unless the Grant Officer determines that further collection action, either by the recipient or subrecipients, would be inappropriate or would prove futile.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.59

 243.36

 241.54

 240.40

 240.38

 239.30

 238.92

 238.46

 238.46

 238.46

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 240.17

 238.60

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 238.43

 308

 1,006

 692

 525

 522

 386

 342

 295

 295

 295

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 493

 309

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

 292

STORAGE

-23

+698

-314

-167

-3

-136

-44

-47

+0

+0

-3

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+201

-184

-17

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

+0

CHANGE

 99

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 158

 166

 149

 180

 117

 115

 117

 117

 119

 114

 111

 163

 171

 133

 166

 81

 83

 125

 123

 37

 73

 6,780

 25,100

 16,600

 12,800

 12,000

 8,890

 7,500

 6,860

 6,470

 6,130

 5,830

 5,630

 5,470

 5,360

 5,450

 7,590

 11,400

 7,210

 6,320

 5,990

 5,830

 5,790

 5,690

 5,490

 5,380

 5,280

 5,190

 5,230

 5,210

 5,190

 5,110

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -39 2,717 234,770

ACRE-FEET -39 5,389 465,666

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 471,128

 331

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 16

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 21

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 37

 73

CORNING CANAL 73

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 5,389

TO SACTO RIVER 465,666
**Exhibit
      31.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**




I,
      Nicholas Gerber, certify that:




1.
      I have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of United States Oil Fund, LP;
      and




2.
      Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report.






Dated
      this 20 th day of
      September, 2007.


By:
              /s/
                Nicholas D. Gerber**Nicholas
                  D. Gerber**
                **Chief
                  Executive Officer of Victoria Bay Asset Management,
                  LLC**
                **(Principal
                  executive officer)**
94°32' 94°31' 94°30' 94°29' 94°28' 

39°00' 

39°01' 

39°02' 

39°03' 

39°04' 

39°05' 

39°06' 

39°07' 

39°08' 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Prepared in cooperation with the 

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2006–5089

Blue Parkway gage, stage elevation of 770 feet—PLATE 4.11

Kelly, B.P., Rydlund, P.H., Jr., 2006

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

By

Brian P. Kelly and Paul H. Rydlund, Jr.

2006

* #

* #

* #

* #

* #

A B C D E F 

13 

12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003 

 and City of Kansas City, Missouri, digital data, 1:833, 2004

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

U.S. Geological Survey 

stage gage at 12th Street 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at Blue Parkway 

National Weather Service

flood-forecast location 

at Highway 40

U.S. Geological Survey streamflow 

gage at Stadium Drive 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at 63rd Street 

I - 435 

I-435 

Hawthorne Road 

 Trafficway 

Clary Boulevard 

I-70 

23rd Street 

U S Highway 40 

17th Street 

Road I - 435 

R

a

yto

wn

Coal Mine Road

Van Brunt 

Boulevard

Avenue 

Hard

esty

63rd Steet Brighton

L

e

wis

R

oad

67th

Street

Manchester

Gregory Boulevard

Drive Crest

A

venue

EXPLANATION

WATER DEPTH, IN FEET, AT STAGE ELEVATION 

 OF 770 FEET AT BLUE PARKWAY GAGE 

 >, greater than

 0 to 1

 >1 to 2

 >2 to 5

 >5 to 10

 >10

LAND SURFACE BELOW RIVER STAGE

 (levee protected or unconnected to river)

STUDY AREA

GAGE OR FLOOD-FORECAST LOCATION

 (ALERT, Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time)

# *

BLUE RIVER FLOOD INUNDATION

0 0.5 1 KILOMETER 

0 0.5 1 MILE 

FORECAST LOCATION STAGE STAGE ELEVATION 

12TH STREET 41.6 756.0

HIGHWAY 40 37.4 759.0

STADIUM DRIVE 42.7 761.0

BLUE PARKWAY 47.5 770.0 

63RD STREET 62.0 783.8
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  (1)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-128898) pertaining to the WebMD Health
Corp. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan,(2)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-145329) pertaining to the WebMD Health
Corp. Long-Term Incentive Plan for Employees of Subimo, LLC,(3)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-153187) pertaining to the WebMD Health
Corp. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan,(4)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333- 162651) pertaining to the stock option
plans of HLTH Corporation (HLTH) and certain predecessor companies that were assumed
by WebMD in connection with its merger with HLTH, and(5)
    
    Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333- 162653) pertaining to the WebMD Health
Corp. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan,
  Ernst & Young LLP
T he Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Arkansas.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-4218

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Louis Ray Jones, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 1, 1998 Filed: July 10, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD , Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Louis Ra y Jones appeals from the 41-month sentence imposed on him by th e district court after he pleaded guilty to possessing stolen property, in violation of 18

1 U.S.C. §§ 922(j) and 2313 (1994). In a brief filed pursuant to Anders v. California ,-2-

386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel argues that the district court abused its discretion i n imposing the sentence. We disagree and affirm. We conclude the argument advanced by counsel is unreviewable, because th e district court imposed a sentence within the applicable Guidelines imprisonment range of 33 to 41 months, and Jones does not contend, nor does it appear, that the range was improperly calculated or that the sentence was otherwise imposed in “ violation of law.” See 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (1994) (bases for appeal of sentence by defendant); United States v. Woodrum , 959 F.2d 100, 101 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (sentence no t reviewable merely because it is at top of properly calculated Guidelines range). Pursuantto Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we have conducted a d e novo review for any non-frivolous issues, and have found none. The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
§ 667.160 What reallocation procedures must the Governors use? ( a ) The Governor may reallocate youth, adult, and dislocated worker funds among local areas within the State in accordance with the provisions of sections 128(c) and 133(c) of the Act. If the Governor chooses to reallocate funds, the provisions in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section apply.
( b ) For the youth, adult and dislocated worker programs, the amount to be recaptured from each local area for purposes of reallocation, if any, must be based on the amount by which the prior year's unobligated balance of allocated funds exceeds 20 percent of that year's allocation for the program, less any amount reserved (up to 10 percent) for the costs of administration. Unobligated balances must be determined based on allocations adjusted for any allowable transfer between funding streams. This amount, if any, must be separately determined for each funding stream.
( c ) To be eligible to receive youth, adult or dislocated worker funds under the reallocation procedures, a local area must have obligated at least 80 percent of the prior program year's allocation, less any amount reserved (up to 10 percent) for the costs of administration, for youth, adult, or dislocated worker activities, as separately determined. A local area's eligibility to receive a reallocation must be separately determined for each funding stream.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Michael L. Paxton, ChiefFinancial Officer of Intrusion Inc., certify that:

 

(1)         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSBof Intrusion Inc.:

 

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

(4)         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

 

(a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

(5)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 10, 2005 | /s/  Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                               | Michael  L. Paxton       |
|                               | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
#### § 667.820 What authority does the Administrative Law Judge have in ordering relief as an outcome of an administrative hearing?

In ordering relief, the ALJ has the full authority of the Secretary under the Act.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Spotlight on Women in the United States, 1956-1957

              																	Beyer, Sylva S. (Sylva Sternoff)					 and 	United States. Women's Bureau. 						*Spotlight on Women in the United States, 1956-1957*,										1957,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/294,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,049.39

 1,049.84

 1,050.35

 1,050.80

 1,051.25

 1,052.12

 1,054.02

 1,055.53

 1,056.58

 1,057.45

 1,058.50

 1,059.63

 1,060.59

 1,061.12

 1,061.10

 1,061.06

 1,061.04

 1,061.06

 1,060.90

 1,060.48

 1,059.81

 1,059.08

 1,058.34

 1,057.76

 1,057.20

 1,056.87

 1,056.72

 1,056.75

 1,056.93

 1,057.09

 4,046.3

 4,058.7

 4,072.8

 4,085.3

 4,097.8

 4,122.1

 4,175.5

 4,218.3

 4,248.2

 4,273.2

 4,303.3

 4,336.0

 4,363.8

 4,379.1

 4,378.6

 4,377.4

 4,376.8

 4,377.4

 4,372.8

 4,360.6

 4,341.2

 4,320.1

 4,298.7

 4,282.0

 4,266.0

 4,256.5

 4,252.2

 4,253.1

 4,258.2

 4,262.8

STORAGE

+14.9

+12.4

+14.1

+12.5

+12.5

+24.3

+53.4

+42.8

+29.9

+24.9

+30.2

+32.7

+27.8

+15.4

-0.6

-1.2

-0.6

+0.6

-4.6

-12.2

-19.4

-21.1

-21.3

-16.7

-16.1

-9.5

-4.3

+0.9

+5.1

+4.6

CHANGE

 16,749

 15,332

 15,655

 15,423

 15,347

 20,847

 34,116

 30,341

 23,765

 21,499

 23,598

 27,688

 32,464

 29,318

 22,450

 22,337

 22,699

 24,966

 25,469

 22,612

 20,490

 19,606

 19,046

 21,999

 16,416

 15,982

 15,557

 14,267

 14,512

 13,131

INFLOW

 9,138

 8,916

 8,346

 8,960

 8,875

 8,577

 7,181

 8,741

 8,620

 8,816

 8,366

 10,318

 13,679

 13,615

 13,502

 13,779

 14,001

 13,659

 13,857

 14,202

 14,493

 15,458

 15,228

 16,893

 16,436

 17,351

 16,969

 12,334

 11,642

 10,678

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 880

 4,741

 7,911

 9,164

 9,041

 8,991

 10,997

 13,924

 14,512

 15,690

 14,695

 14,425

 13,325

 8,023

 3,354

 722

 1,409

 145

 0

OUTLET

 97

 147

 180

 164

 156

 25

 17

 25

 59

 126

 8

 26

 34

 51

 77

 103

 0

 17

 26

 26

 85

 110

 152

 194

 59

 42

 25

 92

 134

 143

C.F.S.

 .12

 .18

 .22

 .20

 .19

 .03

 .02

 .03

 .07

 .15

 .01

 .03

 .04

 .06

 .09

 .12

 .00

 .02

 .03

 .03

 .10

 .13

 .18

 .23

 .07

 .05

 .03

 .11

 .16

 .17

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.13

 2.35

 1.02

 .02

 .05

 .11

 .75

 .37

 .03

 .00

 .00

 1.02

 1.90

 .34

 .34

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .22

 .12

 .48

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2017 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: May 10, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +231.4 633,681 362,630 0 151,949 2,400 2.87 10.29

ACRE-FEET +231,400 1,256,906 719,277 0 301,391 4,760

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 719,277

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 301,391

 1,020,668

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 10.29

JULY 1, 2016 98.44

 4,031.3

Table 3

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 98.44
§ 609.21 Findings of Federal agency. ( a ) *Answering request.* Within four workdays after receipt from a State agency of a request for Federal findings on a form furnished by the State agency, and prescribed by the Department, a Federal agency shall make such Federal findings, complete all copies of the form, and transmit the completed copies to the State agency. If documents necessary for completion of the form have been assigned to an agency records center or the Federal Records Center in St. Louis, the Federal agency shall obtain the necessary information from the records center. Any records center shall give priority to such a request.
( b ) *Failure to meet time limit.* If a completed form containing the Federal agency's findings cannot be returned within four workdays of receipt, the Federal agency immediately shall inform the State agency, and shall include an estimated date by which the completed form will be returned.
( c ) *Administrative control.* Each Federal agency shall maintain a control of all requests for Federal findings received by it, and the Federal agency's response to each request. The records shall be maintained so as to enable the Federal agency to ascertain at any time the number of such forms that have not been returned to State agencies, and the dates of the Federal agency's receipt of such unreturned forms.