November 17, 2015

Exemption No. 13319A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 3335

Mr. Josh May Autonomous Flight Technologies

827 Welton Ave nue Roanoke, VA 24015

Dear Mr. May:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment . It explains

the basis for our decision , describes its effect, and lists the revised conditions and limitations.

By letter dated June 19, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Autonomous Flight Technologies (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an

e xemption

. In the October 23, 2015 decision letter, the FAA granted Exemption No. 13319

. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection. At the time, the FAA was unable to approve the

Anaconda UAS

. The FAA is now prepared to act on that request.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

. T he

unmanned aircraft authorized in the original grant are compar able in type, size, weight, speed and operating capabilities to those in this petition

.

Airworthiness Certification

In accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of Public Law 112

− 95 in

reference to 49 U.S.C. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation

has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Sect ion 333. Therefore, the FAA

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products and parts,2

Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

Our De cision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 13319 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator

, the operator is granted an amendment to add new aircraft to its UAS operations.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 13319 remain in effect except as follows. Condition No. 1 has been updated to reflect the additional aircraft

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this ex emption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 3,

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus 1 , DJI Inspire 1, DJI Spreading Wings S

- 800, Robo Flight

RF

- 70 , and Anaconda UAS when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption.

This exemption terminates on October 31, 2017

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely

, /s/

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

1 In the October 23, 2015

, grant of exemption, the FAA granted the DJI Phantom 3 Plus. The FAA is clarifying the approved aircraft in this

amendment.