alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2123a. Research program

#### (a) In general

The Office of Travel and Tourism Industries shall expand and continue its research and development activities in connection with the promotion of international travel to the United States, including—

(1) expanding access to the official Mexican travel surveys data to provide the States with traveler characteristics and visitation estimates for targeted marketing programs;

(2) expanding the number of inbound air travelers sampled by the Commerce Department's Survey of International Travelers to reach a 1 percent sample size and revising the design and format of questionnaires to accommodate a new survey instrument, improve response rates to at least double the number of States and cities with reliable international visitor estimates and improve market coverage;

(3) developing estimates of international travel exports (expenditures) on a State-by-State basis to enable each State to compare its comparative position to national totals and other States;

(4) evaluate the success of the Corporation in achieving its objectives and carrying out the purposes of section 2131 of this title; and

(5) research to support the annual reports required by section 2123(d) of this title.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary of Commerce for fiscal years 2010 through 2014 such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

(Pub. L. 87–63, title II, §203, as added Pub. L. 111–145, §9(j), formerly §9(h), Mar. 4, 2010, 124 Stat. 64; renumbered 9(j), Pub. L. 113–235, div. B, title VI, §606(1), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2219.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 2123a, Pub. L. 87–63, title II, §203, as added Pub. L. 102–372, §8(a), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1177, provided for program of financial assistance to cooperative tourism marketing programs, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 104–288, §9(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3407.

Another prior section 2123a, Pub. L. 87–63, title II, §203, formerly §5, June 29, 1961, 75 Stat. 130; renumbered title II, §203, and amended Pub. L. 97–63, §3(e), Oct. 16, 1981, 95 Stat. 1013, directed Secretary to submit annual reports to President and Congress on activities under this chapter, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 102–372, §8(a), Sept. 30, 1992, 106 Stat. 1177. Section was formerly classified to section 2125 of this title prior to its renumbering by Pub. L. 97–63.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,039.33

 1,038.81

 1,038.35

 1,037.84

 1,037.37

 1,036.90

 1,036.45

 1,035.86

 1,035.37

 1,034.88

 1,034.35

 1,033.87

 1,033.34

 1,032.70

 1,032.07

 1,031.45

 1,030.83

 1,030.26

 1,029.72

 1,029.25

 1,028.75

 1,028.15

 1,027.42

 1,026.78

 1,026.17

 1,025.62

 1,025.16

 1,024.65

 1,024.08

 1,023.62

 1,023.12

 3,774.8

 3,761.1

 3,749.0

 3,735.5

 3,723.2

 3,710.9

 3,699.2

 3,683.8

 3,671.1

 3,658.3

 3,644.6

 3,632.3

 3,618.6

 3,602.2

 3,586.1

 3,570.3

 3,554.5

 3,540.1

 3,526.4

 3,514.6

 3,502.0

 3,486.9

 3,468.7

 3,452.7

 3,437.6

 3,424.0

 3,412.6

 3,400.0

 3,386.0

 3,374.8

 3,362.5

STORAGE

-13.5

-13.8

-12.1

-13.4

-12.3

-12.3

-11.7

-15.4

-12.7

-12.7

-13.7

-12.4

-13.6

-16.4

-16.1

-15.8

-15.8

-14.4

-13.6

-11.9

-12.6

-15.1

-18.2

-15.9

-15.2

-13.6

-11.4

-12.6

-14.0

-11.3

-12.2

CHANGE

 4,221

 3,904

 4,365

 3,654

 3,757

 4,520

 5,180

 3,842

 5,361

 5,393

 4,635

 4,478

 4,873

 3,033

 2,871

 2,937

 3,125

 3,756

 3,333

 4,387

 4,158

 3,339

 3,372

 3,772

 3,227

 3,666

 3,895

 3,958

 3,253

 3,430

 3,225

INFLOW

 10,745

 10,681

 10,245

 10,189

 9,710

 10,582

 11,064

 11,505

 11,716

 11,619

 11,344

 10,483

 11,497

 11,034

 10,715

 10,714

 11,052

 10,815

 9,991

 10,116

 10,233

 10,642

 12,312

 11,652

 10,705

 10,312

 9,591

 10,270

 10,226

 8,893

 9,177

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 287

 155

 232

 231

 262

 146

 38

 92

 61

 183

 197

 242

 249

 279

 285

 187

 22

 223

 223

 245

 266

 287

 257

 161

 161

 218

 36

 22

 94

 216

 216

C.F.S.

 .37

 .20

 .30

 .30

 .34

 .19

 .05

 .12

 .08

 .24

 .26

 .32

 .33

 .37

 .38

 .25

 .03

 .30

 .30

 .33

 .36

 .39

 .35

 .22

 .22

 .30

 .05

 .03

 .13

 .30

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .19

 .24

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2013 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 19, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -425.7 120,920 329,830 0 0 5,773 7.71 .56

ACRE-FEET -425,700 239,845 654,218 0 0 11,451

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 654,218

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 654,218

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .56

JULY 1, 2012 45.28

 3,788.4

Table 3
§ 422.903 Prohibited conduct. We will ban you from entering our offices if you: ( a ) Physically or verbally assault our personnel or a member of the public in our occupied space;
( b ) Use force or threats of force against our personnel or offices, including but not limited to communicating threats in person or by phone, facsimile, mail, or electronic mail;
( c ) Engage in disruptive conduct that impedes our personnel from performing their duties; or
( d ) Engage in disruptive conduct that impedes members of the public from obtaining services from our personnel.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 24 - 0014 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KENNETH WESLEY - HERBERT ROWE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 3 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 28 2024

08/28/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0014
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.1290 Purpose and scope of subpart B. This subpart sets out the procedures established by the Secretary of the United States Department of Labor (the Secretary) to acquire information sufficient to make factual determinations of: ( a ) Whether there are sufficient able, willing, and qualified U.S. workers available to perform the temporary and seasonal agricultural employment for which an employer desires to import nonimmigrant foreign workers (H-2A workers); and
( b ) Whether the employment of H-2A workers will adversely affect the wages and working conditions of workers in the U.S. similarly employed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”)
for the year ended December 31, 2014 of NanoVibronix, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Stephen Brown, the Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |        |                                                                               
|--------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  March 30, 2015 | By:    | /s/ Stephen Brown                                                             
|                      | Name:  | Stephen Brown                                                                 
|                      | Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer)



The foregoing certification is being furnished
as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly,
is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
EXHIBIT 99.1**Report of Independent Accountants**To the Board of Directors of Triad Financial Corporation:**Re: Sale and Servicing Agreement related to Triad Automobile Receivables Trust 2005-A**We have examined management’s assertion about Triad Financial Corporation’s (“Triad”) compliancewith the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America’s*Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*(“USAP”), to the extent such procedures areapplicable as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying managementassertion (Exhibit I). Management is responsible for Triad’s compliance with those minimumservicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion aboutTriad’s compliance based on our examination.Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the AmericanInstitute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about Triad’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination of Triad’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards.In our opinion, management’s assertion that Triad has complied with the aforementioned minimumservicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
§ 404.2020 Information considered in selecting a representative payee. In selecting a payee we try to select the person, agency, organization or institution that will best serve the interest of the beneficiary. In making our selection we consider— ( a ) The relationship of the person to the beneficiary;
( b ) The amount of interest that the person shows in the beneficiary;
( c ) Any legal authority the person, agency, organization or institution has to act on behalf of the beneficiary;
( d ) Whether the potential payee has custody of the beneficiary;
( e ) Whether the potential payee is in a position to know of and look after the needs of the beneficiary;
( f ) The potential payee's criminal history; and
( g ) Whether the beneficiary made an advance designation (see § 404.2018).
[47 FR 30472, July 14, 1982, as amended at 84 FR 4325, Feb. 15, 2019; 85 FR 7664, Feb. 11, 2020]
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 13-10367

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00023-SPM-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JONATHAN MATTHEW WOOD, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(August 9, 2013)

Before WILSON, MARTIN and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Chet Kaufman, counsel for Jonathan Matthew Wood in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that 

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because 

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, 

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Wood’s conviction and sentence 

are AFFIRMED.

Case: 13-10367 Date Filed: 08/09/2013 Page: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4332 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4332

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 20, 2016

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 
                          and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Small Business Act to clarify the duties of procurement 
 center representatives with respect to reviewing solicitations for a 
                    contract or task order contract.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maximizing Small Business 
Competition Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. DUTIES OF PROCUREMENT CENTER REPRESENTATIVES WITH RESPECT TO 
              REVIEWING SOLICITATIONS FOR A CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER 
              CONTRACT.

    Section 15(l)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(l)(2)(D)) 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) through (I) as 
        subparagraphs (F) through (J), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(E) review any solicitation for a contract or 
                task order without regard to whether the contract or 
                task order or part of the contract or task order is set 
                aside for small business concerns, whether one or more 
                contract or task order awards are reserved for small 
                business concerns under a multiple award contract, or 
                whether or not the solicitation would result in a 
                bundled or consolidated contract (as defined in 
                subsection (s)) or a bundled or consolidated task 
                order;''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York v. John N. Anhut.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
### §3202. Congressional statement of purpose

It is the purpose of this chapter to promote the policies set forth above by—

(a) establishing a more effective framework for international cooperation to meet the energy needs of all nations and to ensure that the worldwide development of peaceful nuclear activities and the export by any nation of nuclear materials and equipment and nuclear technology intended for use in peaceful nuclear activities do not contribute to proliferation;

(b) authorizing the United States to take such actions as are required to ensure that it will act reliably in meeting its commitment to supply nuclear reactors and fuel to nations which adhere to effective non-proliferation policies;

(c) providing incentives to the other nations of the world to join in such international cooperative efforts and to ratify the Treaty; and

(d) ensuring effective controls by the United States over its exports of nuclear materials and equipment and of nuclear technology.

(Pub. L. 95–242, §3, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 120.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 95–242, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 120, known as the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3201 of this title and Tables.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 10, 1978, except as otherwise provided and regardless of any requirements for the promulgation of implementing regulations, see section 603(c) of Pub. L. 95–242, set out as a note under section 3201 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                        1,829
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                  569
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,856
<PP&E>                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                8,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         110
<BONDS>                                       2,396
<COMMON>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                    5,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  8,614
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              922
<CGS>                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               59
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           59
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  59
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.52
        

</TABLE>
#### Blanche Marquis, Appellant, v. Leonard J. Marquis et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and deny the motion. [178 Misc. 702.]
<page> EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee
Horwitz, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.









By: /s/ Lee Horwitz

Name:	   Lee Horwitz
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
        the general partner of the Partnership

Date:	   August 14, 2007
October 2022

Day

Shasta 

Inflow

C.F.S.

1

Prev Day

F.C. Par

(Col. 3)

X .95

2

F.C

Param

(Cols. 1+2)

3

.0356*

X Days

12/23 Thru

3/20

4

530,000

Minus

F.C.

Param

(Col 3)

5

Cols

4x5

6

F.C.

Reserv

(1,300,000 - 

Col 6)

7

Minus 

14,943

Per Day

After

3/20

8

Adjusted

F.C.

Reserv

(7-8)

Perm

Storage

100,000

1 3,210 95,000 98,210 4,531,000

2 1,692 93,300 94,992 4,509,000

3 2,992 90,242 93,234 4,488,000

4 2,398 88,572 90,970 4,467,000

5 1,207 86,422 87,629 4,445,000

6 2,082 83,247 85,329 4,424,000

7 1,336 81,063 82,399 4,403,000

8 1,942 78,279 80,221 4,382,000

9 1,870 76,210 78,080 4,360,000

10 1,743 74,176 75,919 4,339,000

11 2,783 72,123 74,906 4,318,000

12 921 71,161 72,082 4,296,000

13 1,932 68,478 70,410 4,275,000

14 1,679 66,889 68,568 4,254,000

15 1,337 65,140 66,477 4,232,000

16 1,398 63,153 64,551 4,211,000

17 2,106 61,323 63,429 4,190,000

18 2,724 60,258 62,982 4,168,000

19 2,223 59,833 62,056 4,147,000

20 1,985 58,953 60,938 4,126,000

21 1,752 57,891 59,643 4,104,000

22 1,349 56,661 58,010 4,083,000

23 2,191 55,109 57,300 4,062,000

24 2,755 54,435 57,190 4,041,000

25 1,923 54,331 56,254 4,019,000

26 1,697 53,441 55,138 3,998,000

27 1,955 52,381 54,336 3,977,000

28 2,490 51,620 54,110 3,955,000

29 2,731 51,404 54,135 3,934,000

30 1,959 51,428 53,387 3,913,000

31 2,092 50,718 52,810 3,891,000

Comments: 

* LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) ) 

IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Shasta Flood Control Requirements

Run Date: 4/19/2023
Exhibit 23.4

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Chesapeake Funding LLC on Form S-3 of our report dated January 29, 2003 (which
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to Chesapeake Funding LLC if it had been operated as an unaffiliated
entity)appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chesapeake Funding LLC for
the year ended December 31, 2002, and to the use of such report dated January
29, 2003, incorporated by reference in the Prospectus, which is a part of this
Registration Statement.

We also consent to the use in this Registration Statement of D.L. Peterson Trust
on Form S-1 of our report dated January 29, 2003 (which expresses an unqualified
opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to D.L. Peterson Trust
if it had been operated as an unaffiliated entity) appearing in the Prospectus,
which is a part of this Registration Statement.

We also consent to the reference to us under the headings "Selected Financial
Data" and "Experts" in such Prospectus.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Baltimore, MD
August 1,  2003