Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Notices 23327 

1Public Law 107–71, 115 Stat. 597 (November 19, 

2001). 

2See 49 U.S.C. 114(d). The TSA Assistant 

Secretary’s current authorities under ATSA have 

been delegated to him by the Secretary of Homeland 

Security. Section 403(2) of the Homeland Security 

Act (HSA) of 2002, Public Law 107–296, 116 Stat. 

2315 (2002), transferred all functions of TSA, 

including those of the Secretary of Transportation 

and the Under Secretary of Transportation of 

Security related to TSA, to the Secretary of 

Homeland Security. Pursuant to DHS Delegation 

Number 7060.2, the Secretary delegated to the 

Assistant Secretary (then referred to as the 

Administrator of TSA), subject to the Secretary’s 

guidance and control, the authority vested in the 

Secretary with respect to TSA, including that in sec. 

403(2) of the HSA. 

3 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(3). 

4 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(10). 

5 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(11). 

6 49 U.S.C. 114(f)(15). 

enrollment process. This optional 

survey is administered by a Trusted 

Agent (representative of the TWIC 

enrollment contractor, who performs 

enrollment functions) during the 

process to activate the TWIC. These 

surveys are collected at each enrollment 

center and compiled to produce reports 

that are reviewed by the contractor and 

TSA. The current estimated annualized 

reporting burden is 2,630,719 hours and 

the estimated annualized cost burden is 

$57,002,236. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on April 20, 

2011. 

Joanna Johnson, 

TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office 

of Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9982 Filed 4–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Transportation Security Administration 

Intent To Request Renewal From OMB 

of One Current Public Collection of 

Information: Highway Corporate 

Security Review 

AGENCY: Transportation Security 

Administration, DHS. 

ACTION: 60-day Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security 

Administration (TSA) invites public 

comment on one currently approved 

information collection requirement 

(ICR), Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number 1652–0036, 

abstracted below that we will submit to 

OMB for renewal in compliance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). 

The ICR describes the nature of the 

information collection and its expected 

burden. The ICR will assess the current 

security practices in the highway and 

motor carrier industry by way of its 

Highway Corporate Security Review 

(CSR) Program, which encompasesses 

site visits and interviews, and is part of 

the larger domain awareness, 

prevention, and protection program 

supporting TSA’s and the Department of 

Homeland Security’s missions. 

DATES: Send your comments by June 27, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be e-mailed 

to TSAPRA@dhs.gov or delivered to the 

TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information 

Technology (OIT), TSA–11, 

Transportation Security Administration, 

601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA 

20598–6011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Joanna Johnson at the above address, or 

by telephone (571) 227–3651. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

In accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 

et seq.), an agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless it displays a valid OMB control 

number. The ICR documentation is 

available at http://www.reginfo.gov. 

Therefore, in preparation for OMB 

review and approval of the following 

information collection, TSA is soliciting 

comments to— 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

information requirement is necessary for 

the proper performance of the functions 

of the agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including using 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

Information Collection Requirement 

OMB Control Number 1652–0036; 

Corporate Security Review. Under the 

Aviation and Transportation Security 

Act (ATSA) 1 and delegated authority 

from the Secretary of Homeland 

Security, TSA has broad responsibility 

and authority for ‘‘security in all modes 

of transportation * * * including 

security responsibilities * * * over 

modes of transportation that are 

exercised by the Department of 

Transportation.’’ 2 TSA has additional 

authorities as well. TSA is specifically 

empowered to develop policies, 

strategies, and plans for dealing with 

threats to transportation,3 ensure the 

adequacy of security measures for the 

transportation of cargo,4 oversee the 

implementation and ensure the 

adequacy of security measures at 

transportation facilities,5 and carry out 

other appropriate duties relating to 

transportation security.6

One way TSA carries out its surface 

transportation responsibilities is by 

assessing the current security practices 

in the trucking, school bus, and motor 

coach industries, as well as at State 

Departments of Transportation (DOTs), 

by way of its Corporate Security Review 

(CSR) program. The CSR program 

encompasses site visits and interviews, 

and is one piece of a much larger 

domain awareness, prevention, and 

protection program in support of TSA’s 

and the Department of Homeland 

Security’s missions. TSA is seeking to 

renew its OMB approval for this 

information collection so that TSA can 

continue to ascertain minimum security 

standards and identify coverage gaps, 

activities critical to carrying out its 

transportation security mission. 

The CSR is an ‘‘instructive’’ review 

that provides TSA with an 

understanding of certain surface 

transportation owner/operators’ security 

programs, if they have adopted such 

programs. In carrying out CSRs, 

Transportation Security Specialists 

(TSS) from TSA’s Highway and Motor 

Carrier Division (HMC) and 

Transportation Security InspectorsSurface (TSI–S) conduct site visits of 

trucking (excluding hazardous materials 

shippers and carriers), school bus, 

motor coach companies and State DOTs 

throughout the nation. The TSA 

representatives analyze the owner’s/ 

operator’s security plan, if the owner/ 

operator has adopted one, and 

determines if the mitigation measures 

included in the plan are being properly 

implemented. In addition to examining 

the security plan document, TSA 

reviews one or more assets of the 

owner/operator or State DOT. 

During the site visits, TSA completes 

a CSR form, which contains questions 

concerning ten topics: Management and 

oversight of the security plan, threat 

assessment, criticality assessment, 

vulnerability assessment, personnel 

security, training, physical security 

countermeasures, en route security, 

information technology security, and 

security exercises and drills. TSA 

conducts this collection through 

voluntary face-to-face visits at the 

headquarters of the surface 

transportation owners/operators. 

Typically, TSA sends one employee to 

conduct a two to three hour discussion/ 

interview with representatives from the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
23328 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 80 / Tuesday, April 26, 2011 / Notices 

owner/operator. TSA plans to collect 

information from businesses of all sizes 

in the course of conducting these 

surface mode CSRs. 

TSA conducts these interviews to 

ascertain information on security 

measures and to identify security gaps. 

The interviews also provide the TSA 

with a method to encourage the surface 

transportation owners/operators affected 

by the CSRs to be diligent in effecting 

and maintaining security-related 

improvements. This program provides 

TSA with real-time information on 

current security practices within the 

trucking, school bus, and motor coach 

modes of the surface transportation 

sector. This information allows TSA to 

adapt programs to the changing threat 

dynamically, while incorporating an 

understanding of the improvements 

owners/operators make in their security 

posture. Without this information, the 

ability of the TSA to perform its security 

mission would be severely hindered. 

Additionally, the relationships these 

face-to-face contacts foster are critical to 

the TSA’s ability to reach out to the 

surface transportation stakeholders 

affected by the CSRs. The relationships 

foster a sense of trust and a willingness 

to share information with the Federal 

Government. TSA assures respondents 

the portion of their responses deemed 

Sensitive Security Information (SSI) will 

be handled consistent with 49 CFR parts 

15 and 1520. 

The annual hour burden for this 

information collection is estimated to be 

1,500 hours. While TSA estimates a 

total of 500 potential respondents, this 

estimate is based on TSA conducting 

500 visits per year, each visit lasting two 

to three hours. TSA estimates no annual 

cost burden to respondents. 

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on April 20, 

2011. 

Joanna Johnson, 

Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office of 

Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9983 Filed 4–25–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–5487–N–12] 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection for Public Comment; Indian 

Community Development Block Grant 

Information Collection 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Public and Indian 

Housing, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The proposed information 

collection requirement described below 

will be submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The Department is 

soliciting public comments on the 

subject proposal. 

DATES: Comments due date: June 27, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name/or OMB Control 

number and should be sent to: Colette 

Pollard, Departmental Reports 

Management Officer, QDAM, 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street, SW., 

Room 4160, Washington, DC 20410– 

5000; telephone (202) 402–3400 (this is 

not a toll-free number) or by e-mail to 

Colette.Pollard@hud.gov. Persons with 

hearing or speech impairments may 

access this number through TTY by 

calling the toll-free Federal Information 

Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. (Other 

than the HUD USER information line 

and TTY numbers, telephone numbers 

are not toll-free.) 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Arlette Mussington, Office of Policy, 

Programs and Legislative Initiatives, 

PIH, Department of Housing and Urban 

Development, 451 7th Street, SW., 

(L’Enfant Plaza, Room 2206), 

Washington, DC 20410; telephone 202– 

402–4109, (this is not a toll-free 

number). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department will submit the proposed 

information collection to OMB for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35, as amended). This Notice is 

soliciting comments from members of 

the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information to (1) evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (3) enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

This Notice also lists the following 

information: 

Title of Proposal: Indian Community 

Development Block Grant Information 

Collection. 

OMB Control Number: 2577–0191. 

Description of the need for the 

information and proposed use: Title I of 

the Housing and Community 

Development Act of 1974, which 

authorizes Community Development 

Block Grants, requires that grants for 

Indian Tribes be awarded on a 

competitive basis. The purpose of the 

Indian Community Development Block 

Grant (ICDBG) program is to develop 

viable Indian and Alaska Native 

communities by creating decent 

housing, suitable living environments 

and economic opportunities primarily 

for low- and moderate-income persons. 

Consistent with this objective, not less 

than 70 percent of the expenditures are 

to benefit low and moderate-income 

persons. The law specifies four criteria 

or options that are considered to meet 

this objective. The four options or 

criteria are: Area benefit; limited 

clientele; housing; job creation/ 

retention. Eligible applicants include 

Federally recognized Tribes, which 

include Alaska Native communities, 

and Bureau of Indian Affairs or Indian 

Health Service determined Tribally 

authorized Tribal organizations. 

The ICDBG program regulations can 

be found at 24 CFR 1003. The ICDBG 

program for Indian Tribes and Alaska 

Native villages requires eligible 

applicants to submit information to 

enable HUD to select the best projects 

for funding during annual competitions. 

Additionally, the requirements are 

essential for HUD in monitoring grants 

to ensure that grantees are making 

proper use of Federal dollars. 

ICDBG applicants must submit a 

complete application package which 

includes an Application for Federal 

Assistance (SF–424), Supplement 

Survey on Ensuring Equal Opportunity 

for Applicants (SF–424 SUPP), 

Applicant/Recipient Disclosure/Update 

Report (HUD–2880), Implementation 

Schedule (HUD–4125), Cost Summary 

(HUD–4123) and a Program Outcome 

Logic Model (HUD–96010). If the 

applicant has a waiver of the electronic 

submission requirement and is 

submitting a paper application, an 

Acknowledgement of Application 

Receipt (HUD–2993) must also be 

submitted. If the applicant is a Tribal 

organization, a resolution from the Tribe 

stating that the Tribal organization is 

submitting an application on behalf of 

the Tribe must also be included in the 

application package. 

Section 105 of the 1974 Housing and 

Community Development Act (42 U.S.C. 

5305) was amended by section 588 of 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES