alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>                                         EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey D. Hahn, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation ("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant,
certify that:


1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.







Date:  May 17, 2004          /s/ Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Jeffrey D. Hahn
                                 Chief Financial Officer,
                                 Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 general partner of the registrant
Exhibit 99.4


                     INTERSTAR WHOLESALE FINANCE PTY LIMITED
                  SERVICER OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Interstar Wholesale Finance
Pty Limited,  (the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the  agreement  between  Perpetual
Trustees Victoria Limited,  Interstar Wholesale Finance Pty Limited, dated as of
December 3, 1999 (the "Agreement"), does hereby certify that:

1.   Capitalized  terms used but not defined in this Officer's  Certificate have
     their  respective  meanings set forth in the Agreement,  unless the context
     requires   otherwise  or  unless   otherwise   defined  in  the   Officer's
     Certificate.

2.   As of the date  hereof,  Interstar  Wholesale  Finance  Pty  Limited is the
     Servicer of Interstar Millennium Series 2005-1G Trust.

3.   This officer's certificate is delivered pursuant to the Agreement.

4.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period May 4, 2005 to
     June 30,  2005 and of its  performance  under  the  pooling  and  servicing
     agreement or similar agreements was made under my supervision.

5.   Based on such review,  to my  knowledge,  the Servicer  has  fulfilled  its
     obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement or similar agreements
     relating to the Trust  (including  the Master Trust Deed dated  December 2,
     1999 and the  Investment  Management  Agreement  dated  December  3, 1999),
     throughout the period May 4, 2005 to June 30, 2005 and, except as set forth
     in paragraph 6 below.

6.   The following is a description of any  exceptions to paragraph 5 above:  No
     significant deficiencies were detected.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned,  a duly authorized officer of the Servicer,
has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 23rd day of September, 2005.

INTERSTAR WHOLESALE FINANCE PTY LIMITED, as servicer


 /s/  Brian Benari
--------------------------------------
Name:    Brian Benari
Title:   Chief Executive Officer
#### Daniel ROSS, Appellant, v. James C. WOODARD, Chairman, N. C. Parole Comm.; Jane G. Greenlee, Commissioner; Joy J. Johnson, Commissioner; Rae H. McNamara, Commissioner; Commissioner Oxendine; Sam Boyd, Case Analyst, in their individual and official capacities, Appellees.

No. 82-6134.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1982.

Decided July 16, 1982.

*847Thomas F. Loflin, III, Shirley L. Fulton, Durham, N. C., for appellant.

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Jacob L. Safron, Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N. C., on brief, for appellees.

Before BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.

ALBERT V. BRYAN, Senior Circuit Judge:

Presently serving a life sentence in North Carolina for first degree murder and failing in his continuing endeavors to have the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment construed as requiring a prisoner’s access to his files when he is considered for parole, Daniel Ross again appeals. Assuming *arguendo*that our latest pronouncement on this point does not bar the instant action by the doctrine of *res judicata, see Ross v. Byrd,*No. 78-6449 (4th Cir. July 24, 1980) (unpublished), we state unequivocally that *Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex,*442 U.S. 1, 99 S.Ct. 2100, 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979), does not require the State to provide a potential parolee with access to his prison files. *Franklin v. Shields,*569 F.2d 784, 800 (4th Cir.) (en banc), *cert. denied,*435 U.S. 1003, 98 S.Ct. 1659, 56 L.Ed.2d 92 (1978).

The judgment of the District Court is

*Affirmed.*

BUTZNER, Circuit Judge,

concurring:

In *Franklin v. Shields,*569 F.2d 784, 800 (4th Cir. 1978) (en banc), the court held— contrary to the conclusion reached by the panel, 569 F.2d at 794-95—that a prisoner was not entitled to have access to his files. In *Greenholtz v. Nebraska,*442 U.S. 1, 15 n.7, 99 S.Ct. 2100, 2108 n.7, 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979), the Court noted that the question of access to files had not been raised. Consequently, I conclude that the en banc decision of *Franklin v. Shields*dictates affirmance of this appeal.
#### § 652.1 Introduction.

These regulations implement the provisions of the Wagner-Peyser Act, known hereafter as the Wagner-Peyser Act, as amended by title III of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA), Public Law 113-128. The Wagner-Peyser Act Employment Service (ES) is a core program under the WIOA, and an integral component of the one-stop delivery system. Congress intended that the States exercise broad authority in implementing provisions of the Wagner-Peyser Act.
### §1641h. Funds for payment of claims

All payments authorized under this subchapter shall be disbursed exclusively from the claims fund attributable to the country with respect to which the claims are allowed pursuant to this subchapter. All amounts covered into the Treasury to the credit of the claims funds created by section 1641a of this title are hereby permanently appropriated for the making of the payments authorized under this subchapter.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title III, §309, as added Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 645, §3, 69 Stat. 573.)
#### Joseph Rinaudo, Respondent, v. Anna Erichsen, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from a judgment against her and in favor of plaintiff entered upon a jury verdict after a trial in the Ulster County Court. The action was for a balance alleged to be due for the reasonable value of work and material in plaintiff’s oral undertaking to install a hot air furnace in defendant’s house. Defendant denied there was anything due plaintiff and counterclaimed for damages alleged by reason of a fire which partially burned the house and which she alleged was due to plaintiff’s failure to perform his contract, and his negligence and poor workmanship. There was a conflict in the evidence whether the fault and negligence of one party or both caused the .fire. During the trial, over defendant’s objection and exception, plaintiff was allowed to plead and prove defendant’s recovery of fire insurance on account of the fire, and the jury was in effect told that the amount thereof was to be deducted from any damages it found for defendant. This was prejudicial error. *(Merrick*v. *Bramará,*38 Barb. 574, affd. *sub norm. Merrick*v. *Van Santvoord,*34 N. Y. 208; *Bridges*v. *New York Central & H. R. R. R. Co.,*72 N. Y. 26; *Collins*v. *New York Central é H. R. R. R. Co.,*5 Hun 503, affd. 71 N. Y. 609; *Drmkwater*v. *Dins-more,*80 N. Y. 390; *Gusikoff*v. *Republic Storage Co.,*241 App. Div. 889; 25 C. J. S., Damages, § 99.) Judgment and order reversed on the law and a new trial ordered, with costs to. appellant to abide the event. Hill, P. J., Brewster, Poster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur.
### §4172. Savings provisions

#### (a) Determinations, authorizations, etc., under authority of Foreign Service Act of 1946 and grievances, claims, or appeals filed and pending on effective date of this chapter

All determinations, authorizations, regulations, orders, agreements, exclusive recognition of an organization or other actions made, issued, undertaken, entered into, or taken under the authority of the Foreign Service Act of 1946 or any other law repealed, modified, or affected by this chapter shall continue in full force and effect until modified, revoked, or superseded by appropriate authority. Any grievances, claims, or appeals which were filed or made under any such law and are pending resolution on February 15, 1981, shall continue to be governed by the provisions repealed, modified, or affected by this chapter.

#### (b) Increase in annuity or other right to benefits

This chapter shall not affect any increase in annuity or other right to benefits, which was provided by any provision amended or repealed by this chapter, with respect to any individual who became entitled to such benefit prior to February 15, 1981.

#### (c) Cross references

References in law to provisions of the Foreign Service Act of 1946 or other law superseded by this chapter shall be deemed to include reference to the corresponding provisions of this chapter.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2401, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2168.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Service Act of 1946, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (c), is act Aug. 13, 1946, ch. 957, titles I to X, 60 Stat. 999, which was classified principally to chapter 14 (§801 et seq.) of this title, and was repealed by Pub. L. 96–465, title II, §2205(1), Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2159.

This chapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 96–465, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2071, known as the Foreign Service Act of 1980, which is classified principally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3901 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

In subsecs. (a) and (b), "February 15, 1981" substituted for "the effective date of this Act" pursuant to section 2403 of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GLORIA V. SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

INNOVA INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, and MONSANT, LLC,

Appellees.

No. 4D15-4727

[July 6, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Janis Brustares Keyser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

501999CA007242.

Gloria V. Smith, West Palm Beach, pro se.

F. Lee Morrison of South Milhausen, P.A., Orlando, for appellees, 

Innova Investment Group, LLC and Monsant, LLC.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

     Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-054:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the reference to our firm and to the use of our reports dated February 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Archipelago Holdings, Inc., Archipelago Holdings, Inc., management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting of Archipelago Holdings, Inc., included in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of NYSE Group, Inc. dated March 31, 2006.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP
New York, NY
March 31, 2006

---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.640 Service and computation of time. ( a ) Under this subpart, a party may serve any pleading or document by regular mail. Service on a party is complete upon mailing to the last known address or, in the case of the attesting employer, to the employer's designated representative in the U.S. No additional time for filing or response is authorized where service is by mail. In the interest of expeditious proceedings, the administrative law judge may direct the parties to serve pleadings or documents by a method other than regular mail.
( b ) Two (2) copies of all pleadings and other documents in any administrative law judge proceeding shall be served on the attorneys for the Administrator. One copy shall be served on the Associate Solicitor, Division of Fair Labor Standards, Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210, and one copy on the attorney representing the Administrator in the proceeding.
( c ) Time will be computed beginning with the day following the action and includes the last day of the period unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or federally-observed holiday, in which case the time period includes the next business day.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below is assigned to the United States Government as represented by the Secretary of the Navy. The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Sean Linehan a revocable, nonassignable, partially exclusive license to practice in the United States, the Government-owned invention described in U.S. Patent 7,222,525 (Navy Case 84945): Issued May 29, 2007, entitled “SKIN AND TISSUE SIMULANT FOR MUNITIONS TESTING”.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than May 11, 2011.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Christopher Monsey, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Crane Division, Code OOL, Bldg 2, 300 Highway 361, Crane, IN 47522-5001, telephone 812-854-4100.

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: April 19, 2011.

D.J. Werner

Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2011-9993 Filed 4-25-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
### §285v. Sense of Congress respecting membership of Taiwan in Bank

It is the sense of the Congress that it is the policy of the United States that Taiwan (before January 1, 1979, known as the Republic of China) shall be permitted to retain membership in the Asian Development Bank and that the United States Executive Director of the Bank shall notify the Bank that a serious review of future United States participation, including any future payments to the Asian Development Fund, would ensue if Taiwan were expelled from the Bank.

(Pub. L. 89–369, §25, as added Pub. L. 96–259, title II, §201, June 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 430.)
§ 658.711 Decision of the Administrative Review Board. ( a ) Upon the receipt of an appeal to the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, the ALJ must certify the record in the case to the Administrative Review Board, which must make a decision to decertify or not on the basis of the hearing record.
( b ) The decision of the Administrative Review Board must be in writing, and must set forth the factual and legal basis for the decision. After the Board's decision becomes final, notice of the decision must be published in the Federal Register, and copies must be made available for public inspection and copying.
[81 FR 56352, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 13030, Mar. 6, 2020; 85 FR 30615, May 20, 2020]
#### James J. McMahon, Respondent, v. Jerome B. Maltby, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Merrell, J., who dissented.
#### In the Matter of the Application of John J. Cummins, in Behalf of Himself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, etc., Appellant, v. Albert E. Larkin and Others, Respondents, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus to Examine Cards Containing Names and Addresses of Parents and Guardians of Students in the High Schools of the City of Syracuse, etc.

Order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Merrell, J., who dissented.
### §3408. Non-proliferation of nuclear weapons

In accordance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978 [22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.], the Congress strongly encourages all countries in the Middle East which are not parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons to become parties to that Treaty.

(Pub. L. 96–35, §10, July 20, 1979, 93 Stat. 93.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 95–242, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 120, which is classified principally to chapter 47 (§3201 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3201 of this title and Tables.
### §3873. Exemption from Metric Conversion Act of 1975

The Commission is exempt from the provisions of the Metric Conversion Act of 1975 (15 U.S.C. 205a et seq.).

(Pub. L. 96–70, title III, §3302, as added Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3547, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2868.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Metric Conversion Act of 1975, referred to in section catchline and text, is Pub. L. 94–168, Dec. 23, 1975, 89 Stat. 1007, which is classified generally to subchapter II (§205a et seq.) of chapter 6 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 205a of Title 15 and Tables.

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 3302 of Pub. L. 96–70, title III, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 498, amended sections 305, 5102, 5316, 5342, 5343, 5348, 5373, 5504, 5533, 5541, 5583, 6301, 6323, 8146, and 8335 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, and sections 191, 195, and 196 of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to general amendment by Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3547, Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2868.
§ 30.308 To whom is the recommended decision sent? ( a ) A copy of the recommended decision will be mailed to the claimant's last known address and to the claimant's designated representative before OWCP, if any. Notification to either the claimant or the representative will be considered notification to both parties.
( b ) At the same time it issues a recommended decision on a claim, the OWCP district office will forward the record of such claim to the FAB. Any new evidence submitted to the district office following the issuance of the recommended decision will also be forwarded to the FAB for consideration.
[71 FR 78534, Dec. 29, 2006. Redesignated at 84 FR 3050, Feb. 8, 2019]