alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4195 

To repeal the authorizations for office space, office expenses, franking and 

printing privileges, and staff for former Speakers of the House of Representatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 9, 2015 

Mr. JONES (for himself, Mr. MASSIE, and Mr. YOHO) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To repeal the authorizations for office space, office expenses, 

franking and printing privileges, and staff for former 

Speakers of the House of Representatives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR FORMER 

4 SPEAKERS. 

5 (a) REPEAL OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR OFFICE

6 SPACE, OFFICE EXPENSES, FRANKING AND PRINTING

7 PRIVILEGES, AND STAFF.—The first section and sections 

8 2, 4, 5, and 8 of House Resolution 1238, Ninety-first Con9 gress, agreed to December 22, 1970 (as enacted into perVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:37 Dec 10, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4195.IH H4195

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4195 IH

1 manent law by chapter VIII of the Supplemental Appro2 priations Act, 1971) (2 U.S.C. 5125(a), 5126, 5127, 

3 5128, and 5129), are repealed. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Subsection (b) of 

5 the first section of Public Law 93–532 (2 U.S.C. 5125(b)) 

6 is repealed. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this Act shall apply with respect to any individual who 

9 is a former Speaker of the House of Representatives at 

10 any time before, on, or after the date of the enactment 

11 of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,947,990
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,577,368
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,605,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (22,222,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (22,222,439)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (22,222,439)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
(No. 6563

#### Chicago Housing Authority, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 14, 1972.*

Calvin H. Hall, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Berlin, C.J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.94

 239.91

 238.65

 238.61

 238.51

 238.51

 238.51

 238.56

 238.54

 238.50

 238.60

 238.63

 238.82

 238.85

 238.86

 238.87

 238.89

 238.90

 238.89

 238.96

 239.16

 239.17

 239.17

 239.23

 239.24

 239.23

 239.22

 239.23

 239.22

 239.21

 239.23

 344

 459

 314

 310

 300

 300

 300

 305

 303

 299

 309

 312

 332

 335

 336

 337

 339

 340

 339

 346

 369

 370

 370

 378

 379

 378

 376

 378

 376

 375

 378

STORAGE

+0

+115

-145

-4

-10

+0

+0

+5

-2

-4

+10

+3

+20

+3

+1

+1

+2

+1

-1

+7

+23

+1

+0

+8

+1

-1

-2

+2

-2

-1

+3

CHANGE

 277

 153

 107

 202

 255

 260

 269

 177

 244

 308

 274

 149

 125

 191

 284

 196

 306

 184

 197

 195

 138

 141

 81

 80

 125

 96

 106

 96

 92

 113

 58

 5,775

 6,200

 5,100

 4,800

 4,700

 4,700

 4,700

 4,750

 4,700

 4,650

 4,800

 4,950

 5,900

 6,000

 5,950

 5,975

 6,192

 6,190

 6,216

 6,784

 6,816

 6,712

 6,829

 7,119

 7,344

 7,452

 7,310

 7,351

 7,450

 7,454

 7,364

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: November 14, 2002

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +34 5,479 188,233

ACRE-FEET +34 10,868 373,360

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 386,055

 344

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 25

 41

 56

 31

 40

 40

 25

 39

 44

 58

 22

 30

 29

 17

 19

 32

 44

 39

 24

 30

 17

 13

 30

 31

 23

 17

 11

 20

 20

 0

 54

 921

 1,827

CORNING CANAL 1,827

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 10,868

TO SACTO RIVER 373,360

Table 9
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Patrick T. Flynn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Oakmont Acquisition Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors:

a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2006



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Patrick T. Flynn                 
|Patrick T. Flynn                     
|Chief Financial Officer and Principal
|Accounting Officer                   



39
94°32' 94°31' 94°30' 94°29' 94°28' 

39°00' 

39°01' 

39°02' 

39°03' 

39°04' 

39°05' 

39°06' 

39°07' 

39°08' 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Prepared in cooperation with the 

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2006–5089

Missouri River backwater inundation of 740.9 feet—PLATE 5.6

Kelly, B.P., Rydlund, P.H., Jr., 2006

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

By

Brian P. Kelly and Paul H. Rydlund, Jr.

2006

* #

* #

* #

* #

A B C D E F 

13 

12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003 

 and City of Kansas City, Missouri, digital data, 1:833, 2004

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

* #

U.S. Geological Survey 

stage gage at 12th Street 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at Blue Parkway 

National Weather Service

flood-forecast location 

at Highway 40

U.S. Geological Survey streamflow 

gage at Stadium Drive 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at 63rd Street 

I - 435 

I-435 

Hawthorne Road 

 Trafficway 

Clary Boulevard 

I-70 

23rd Street 

U S Highway 40 

17th Street 

Road I - 435 

R

a

yto

wn

Coal Mine Road

Van Brunt 

Boulevard

Avenue 

Hard

esty

63rd Steet Brighton

L

e

wis

R

oad

67th

Street

Manchester

Gregory Boulevard

Drive Crest

A

venue

0 0.5 1 KILOMETER 

0 0.5 1 MILE 

FORECAST LOCATION STAGE STAGE ELEVATION

12TH STREET 26.5 740.9

HIGHWAY 40 19.3 740.9

STADIUM DRIVE 22.6 740.9

BLUE PARKWAY 18.4 740.9

63RD STREET 19.1 740.9

MISSOURI RIVER AT KANSAS CITY 46.1 752.5

MISSOURI RIVER BACKWATER INUNDATION 

WATER DEPTH, IN FEET, AT STAGE ELEVATION 

 OF 740.9 FEET AT THE BLUE RIVER GAGES

 >, greater than

 0 to 1

 >1 to 2

 >2 to 5

 >5 to 10

 >10

LAND SURFACE BELOW RIVER STAGE

 (levee protected or unconnected to river)

STUDY AREA

GAGE OR FLOOD-FORECAST LOCATION

 (ALERT, Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time)

# *

EXPLANATION
#### Puro Filter Corporation of America, Appellant, v. Blanche Trembley, Respondent.

Present — Close, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Johnston, JJ.; Lewis, J., not voting.
No. 11,509.

#### Fleming *v.*Breitner.

Decided January 10, 1927.

Action to set aside judgment. Bill dismissed.

*Affirmed.*

1. *Judgment*— Fraud. An action to set aside a judgment of a justice of the peace on the ground that it was procured by fraud, held properly dismissed, no fraud appearing from the evidence.

*Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Henley A. Calvert, Judge.*

Mr. Harry C. Green, for plaintiff in error.

No appearance for defendant in error.

*En banc.*

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the .court.

Fleming brought an action against Breitner to set aside a judgment of a justice of the peace, in unlawful detainer, ousting him from the possession, of a rooming house. His bill was dismissed and he brings error..

The ground of his action was that the justice judgment was procured by fraud, but his evidence shows no fraud *429in procuring the judgment (he was served and appeared), hut only in procuring a certain chattel mortgage which figured in the detainer case. It need not he said that the district court could not set aside a judgment on such ground.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Allen not participating.
FILED: May 9 , 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________ No. 2 2

- 1440 ( 3:17

- cv
- 00011

- MOC

- DCK )

___________________ LONNIE BILLARD , P laintiff

– Appell ee ,

v.
CHARLOTTE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL; MECKLENBURG AREA CATHOLIC SCHOOLS; ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF CHARLOTTE , Defen d a nt s

– Appell ants

.

___________________ O R D E R

___________________ The court amends its opinion filed May 8 , 2024, as follows:

On page 16, line 3, the citation to Lee is changed to “3d Cir. 2018.” On page 18, in the first full paragraph, line 5, the citation is corrected to read, “ Lebron v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. ”
For the Court

— By Direction /s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk USCA4 Appeal: 22-1440 Doc: 125 Filed: 05/09/2024 Pg: 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.580 Referral of overpayments to the Department of the Treasury for tax refund offset—General. ( a ) The standards we will apply and the procedures we will follow before requesting the Department of the Treasury to offset income tax refunds due taxpayers who have an outstanding overpayment are set forth in §§ 416.580 through 416.586 of this subpart. These standards and procedures are authorized by the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 [31 U.S.C. § 3720A], as implemented through Department of the Treasury regulations at 31 CFR 285.2.
( b ) We will use the Department of the Treasury tax refund offset procedure to collect overpayments that are certain in amount, past due and legally enforceable, and eligible for tax refund offset under regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury. We will use these procedures to collect overpayments only from persons who are not currently entitled to monthly supplemental security income benefits under title XVI of the Act. We refer overpayments to the Department of the Treasury for offset against Federal tax refunds regardless of the amount of time the debts have been outstanding.
[62 FR 49439, Sept. 22, 1997, as amended at 76 FR 65108, Oct. 20, 2011]
Date: October 16, 2015 

Subject: 

From: 

To: Docket: EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505 

On September 18, 2015, the EPA published in the Federal Register a proposed rule 

issued under the Clean Air Act entitled "Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for 

New and Modified Sources." 80 Fed. Reg. 56,593 (September 18, 2015). The EPA recently 

discovered that the following documents were not placed in the docket for this action: 

1. Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Proposed Emission Standards for New and Modified 

Sources in the Oil and Natural Gas Sector (August 2015). 

2. Summary ofE012866/13563 Interagency Review. 

3. Redline/Strikeout of Changes - Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Reconsideration of Certain 

Provisions of New Source Performance Standards; Proposed Rule; Subpart 0000. 

The first document, while not placed in the docket, has been posted on the EPA's website 

since the publication of the proposed rule on August 18, 2015 at EPA's Oil and Natural Gas Air 

Pollution Standards - Regulatory Actions website: 

http://www3.epa.gov/airquality/oilandgas/actions.html. The second record contains the exchange 

with the Office of Management and Budget during the E012866/13563 Interagency review 

process. The third document is a copy of Subpart 0000 regulatory text with red line strike out 

text showing amendatory language. 

The absences of these documents in the docket is an error. The EPA is therefore adding 

these documents to the docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505 as part of the record for this 

proposed action.
#### Lucile Pugh, Appellant, v. Juan D. Almonte, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
#### William S. Sussman et al., Respondents, v. Samuel Kronsky et al., Appellants.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
(No. 73-CC-224

#### Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 12, 1973.*

Atlantic Richfield Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*7Per Curiam.
AMENDMENT TO THE BELLSOUTH PERSONAL
                         RETIREMENT ACCOUNT PENSION PLAN


         WHEREAS,  BellSouth  Corporation (the "Company") sponsors the BellSouth
Personal  Retirement  Account  Pension Plan (the "Plan"),  which was amended and
restated effective January 1, 1998; and

     WHEREAS,  L.M.  Berry and  Company  adopted  the Plan  subject  to  certain
modifications described in Schedule 2 of the Plan; and

         WHEREAS,  the Executive  Nominating  and  Compensation  Committee  (the
"Committee") of the Board of Directors of BellSouth Corporation, at its February
23, 1998, meeting adopted a resolution  amending the Plan to provide an interest
credit rate for 1998 of 6.11% for all Plan participants; and

         WHEREAS, the Committee  authorized  appropriate officers of the Company
to do such  further  acts and to execute  such  documents as may be necessary or
advisable to effectuate the purposes of such resolution; and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  now  desires  to revise  Schedule  2 of the Plan to
reflect such amendment;

         NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority delegated by the Committee as
referred to above,  the  undersigned  officer  approves the following to reflect
such amendment of the Plan:

     Amend  Schedule 2 of the Plan for L.M.  Berry and  Company by adding at the
end of Paragraph 4(f) the following:

                  As of the last day of the Plan Year 1998,  each  Participant's
                  account  shall be credited with interest at the rate of 6.11%,
                  under the terms of the Plan.

         This Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 1998.


                          By:      /s/ Richard D. Sibbernsen
                                   Richard D. Sibbernsen
                                   Vice President - Human Resources
                                   Date:    5/6/99
### §4867. Security management training for officials assigned to a high risk, high threat post

#### (a) In general

Officials described in subsection (c) who are assigned to a high risk, high threat post shall receive security training described in subsection (b) on a mandatory basis in order to improve the ability of such officials to make security-related management decisions.

#### (b) Security training described

Security training referred to in subsection (a) may include—

(1) development of skills to better evaluate threats;

(2) effective use of security resources to mitigate such threats; and

(3) improved familiarity of available security resources.

#### (c) Officials described

Officials referred to in subsection (a) are the following:

(1) Members of the Senior Foreign Service appointed under section 3942(a)(1) or 3943 of this title or members of the Senior Executive Service (as such term is described in section 3132(a)(2) of title 5).

(2) Foreign Service officers appointed under section 3942(a)(1) of this title holding a position in classes FS–1 or FS–2.

(3) Foreign Service Specialists appointed by the Secretary under section 3943 of this title holding a position in classes FS–1 or FS–2.

(4) Individuals holding a position in grades GS–14 or GS–15.

(5) Personal services contractors and other contractors serving in positions or capacities similar to the officials described in paragraphs (1) through (4).

#### (d) Effective date

The requirements of this section shall take effect beginning on the date that is 1 year after December 16, 2016.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title IV, §417, as added Pub. L. 114–323, title I, §121(a), Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1913.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

GS–14 and GS–15, referred to in subsec. (c)(4), are contained in the General Schedule, which is set out under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definition of "high risk, high threat post" as used in this section, see section 4866(d)(2) of this title.
### **CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL YOUTH ANTI-DRUG MEDIA CAMPAIGN**
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated December 5, 2011, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on December 12, 2011, 76 FR 77257, Johnson Matthey Pharma Services, 70 Flagship Drive, North Andover, Massachusetts 01845, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleAmphetamine (1100)
IIMethylphenidate (1724)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
II
 The company plans to utilize this facility to manufacture small quantities of the listed controlled substances in bulk and to conduct analytical testing in support of the company's primary manufacturing facility in West Deptford, New Jersey. The controlled substances manufactured in bulk at this facility will be distributed to the company's customers. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Johnson Matthey Pharma Services to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Pharma Services to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: April 17, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-10051 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P