alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6833

WILLIAM HENRY FIELDS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN OF THE STAUNTON CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-94-825-R)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 23, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Henry Fields, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Fields v. Warden, Staunton Correctional Ctr., No. CA-94-825-R (W.D.

Va. Apr. 28, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
PROMISSORY NOTE

$ 50,000                                                        April 14, 1999
---------                                                       --------------

SECTION ONE
TERMS OF NOTE

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, SGI INTERNATIONAL, a Utah Corporation (the "Debtor"),
located at 1200 Prospect Street, Suite 325, La Jolla, CA 92037 promises to pay
to the order of A.H. Kerr Foundation (hereinafter "Kerr") of 16183 Royal Oak
Road, Encino, CA 91436 the principal sum of Fifty Thousand ($50,000) Dollars
with interest thereon at the rate of twelve(12%) percent per annum, payable on
November 15, 1999, in cash. The original loan that is the subject of this
Promissory Note was made on April 14, 1999.

SECTION TWO
PREPAYMENT OF NOTE

Prepayment of the full principal balance, along with all unpaid interest, or
any portion of the principal balance, along with any portion thereof of unpaid
interest, is permitted at any time without penalty.

SECTION THREE
EFFECT OF WAIVER OF RIGHTS BY KERR

Kerr is not under any obligation to exercise any of its rights under this
note, and failure to exercise its rights under this note or to delay in
exercising any of its rights shall not be deemed a waiver of or in any manner
impair any of the rights of Kerr.

SECTION FOUR
CUMULATIVE RIGHTS AND REMEDIES

The rights and remedies of Kerr specified in this note are cumulative
and do not exclude any other rights or remedies it may otherwise have.

SECTION FIVE
ACCELERATION ON INSOLVENCY OF DEBTOR

If Debtor shall be adjudged bankrupt, or file a petition in bankruptcy, or have
a petition in bankruptcy filed against him, this note shall become due
and payable immediately without demand or notice.

SECTION SIX
WAIVER OF PRESENTMENT, PROTEST, AND NOTICE OF DISHONOR

Debtor hereby waives all acts on the part of Kerr required in fixing the
liability of the party, including among other things presentment, demand,
notice of dishonor, protest, notice of protest, notice of nonpayment, and any
other notice.

SECTION SEVEN
CHOICE OF LAWS

This note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of
California in all respects, including matters of construction, validity and
performance.

SECTION EIGHT
COSTS OF COLLECTION

Debtor shall pay on demand all costs of collection, including legal expenses
and attorney fees, incurred by Kerr in enforcing this note on default.

SECTION NINE
INTEREST CHARGES

If a law, which applies to this note and which sets the maximum interest
amount, is finally interpreted so that the interest in connection with this
note exceed the permitted limits, then: (1) any such interest shall be reduced
by the amount necessary to reduce the interest to the permitted limit; and (2)
any sums already collected (if any) from the Debtor which exceed the permitted
limits will be refunded to the Debtor. The note holder may choose to make this
refund by reducing the principal Debtor owes under this note or by making a
direct payment to the Debtor. If a refund reduces the principal, the reduction
will be treated as a partial payment.

Dated: April 14, 1999

SGI INTERNATIONAL


/s/ JOSEPH SAVOCA
-----------------------
Authorized Signatory
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of the Grandfather Mountain window and vicinity, 
North Carolina and Tennessee

#### Professional Paper 615

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 7**                                
    (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp615 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:06:02
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          401293
<SECURITIES>                                      5000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   697574
<ALLOWANCES>                                      9000
<INVENTORY>                                     985167
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2153799
<PP&E>                                          485816
<DEPRECIATION>                                  386644
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5018749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           272801
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         15760
<OTHER-SE>                                     4730188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5018749
<SALES>                                        3390514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3390514
<CGS>                                          1270184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1270184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1378072
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 985577
<INCOME-TAX>                                    335000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             650577
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    650577
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
 ALON USA ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(dollars in thousands)
 Fiscal Year Ended December 31,2010
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:Earnings:Income (loss) before income tax
expense (benefit), non-controlling
interest in income (loss) of
subsidiaries, accumulated dividends
on preferred stock of subsidiary
and income (loss) from equity
earnings (losses) of investees
    
    $
    (228,524
    )
    
    $
    (191,642
    )
    
    $
    157,427
    
    
    $
    144,937
    
    
    $
    256,416Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    110,197
    
    
    
    127,123
    
    
    
    89,450
    
    
    
    57,925
    
    
    
    35,832Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    469
    
    
    
    425
    
    
    
    344
    
    
    
    394
    
    
    
    441Distributions from equity investees
    
    
    6,681
    
    
    
    19,167
    
    
    
    2,774
    
    
    
    9,301
    
    
    
    2,422Less:Interest capitalized
    
    
    (1,004
    )
    
    
    (1,692
    )
    
    
    (3,417
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total earnings
    
    $
    (112,181
    )
    
    $
    (46,619
    )
    
    $
    246,578
    
    
    $
    212,557
    
    
    $
    295,111Fixed charges:Interest expense, net
    
    $
    94,939
    
    
    $
    111,137
    
    
    $
    67,550
    
    
    $
    47,747
    
    
    $
    30,658Interest capitalized
    
    
    1,004
    
    
    
    1,692
    
    
    
    3,417
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Rental expense interest factor (A)
    
    
    14,254
    
    
    
    14,294
    
    
    
    18,483
    
    
    
    10,178
    
    
    
    5,174Total fixed charges
    
    $
    110,197
    
    
    $
    127,123
    
    
    $
    89,450
    
    
    $
    57,925
    
    
    $
    35,832Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    (B
    )
    
    
    (B
    )
    
    
    2.8x
    
    
    
    3.7x
    
    
    
    8.2x
 
 (A)
    
    The interest portion of rental expense represents one-third of rents, which
is deemed representative of the interest portion of rental expense.(B)
    
    For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, our ratio of earnings to fixed charges was less
than one-to-one, and our coverage deficiency was approximately $222.4 million and $173.7 million,
respectively.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4416 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4416

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2016

  Mr. McKinley (for himself and Mr. Delaney) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12715, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission. Any obligation of the licensee for the payment of annual 
charges under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803(e)) 
shall commence upon conclusion of the time period to commence 
construction of the project, as extended by the Commission under this 
subsection.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 
expiration and the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
shall take effect on the date of such expiration.
                                 <all>
```
**PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP**


PricewaterhouseCoopers
      Center


300
      Madison
      Avenue


New
      York NY
      10017


Telephone
      (646) 471
      3000


www.pwc.com




Report
      of Independent Accountants




To
      the
      Board of Directors and Shareholder of


GMAC
      Commercial Mortgage Corporation:




We
      have
      examined management's assertion, dated February 27, 2006, about GMAC Commercial
      Mortgage Corporation's (the "Company's") compliance with its established
      minimum master servicing policy ("Master Servicing Policy"), which management
      derived from the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
      Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP),
      as of and for the year ended
      December 31, 2005 included in the accompanying management assertion (see Exhibit
      I). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the Master
      Servicing Policy. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
      assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.




Our
      examination was made in accordance with the standards established by the
      American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining,
      on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the Master
      Servicing Policy and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
      in the
      circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
      for our
      opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination of the Company's
      compliance with the Master Servicing Policy.




In
      our
      opinion, management's assertion that, except for instances of noncompliance, the
      Company complied with the aforementioned Master Servicing Policy as of and
      for the
      year
      ended December 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects.






**/s/
      PricewaterhouseCoopers
      LLP**




February
      27, 2006
Exhibit 11

                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Nine Month Period Ended,           Quarter Ending
                           September 30,                   September 30,
                        1996           1995            1996            1995
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                     <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings Per share:

Primary                 $1.41          $1.29          $ .47          $ .46

Fully diluted           $1.41          $1.29          $ .47          $ .46
</TABLE>

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are calculated using the following
number of adjusted weighted average shares outstanding:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                      Nine Month Period Ended,            Quarter Ending
                           September 30,                   September 30,
                       1996            1995            1996            1995
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                  <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Primary              4,457,158       4,451,522       4,448,152       4,451,621

Fully diluted        4,457,067       4,451,538       4,452,708       4,451,733
</TABLE>


The weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted to recognize the
dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding employee stock options on both a
primary and fully diluted basis.

The calculations of earnings per share above are based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding including all common stock and common stock
equivalents in conformity with the instructions for Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
The calculation of earnings per share for financial reporting purposes is based
on the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 4,422,912 and 4,407,840
at September 30, 1996 and September 30, 1995, respectively, without giving
effect to the common stock equivalents resulting from the assumed exercise of
stock options, which do not dilute earnings per share by more than 3 percent, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
#### UNDERWRITERS, Inc., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 11200.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Oct. 7, 1954.

Decided Oct. 13, 1954.

J. Webster Jones, Philadelphia, Pa., for petitioner.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Hilbert P. Zarky, C. Guy *954Tadlock, Sp. Assts. to the Atty. Gen., on the brief for respondent.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and STALEY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks to review an order of the Tax Court dismissing its petition for lack of jurisdiction. It appears that the notice of deficiency was mailed on December 12, 1952 and that the petition was filed with the Tax Court on March 13, 1953, which was 91 days thereafter. It was, therefore, filed out of time and conferred no jurisdiction on the court. The order of the Tax Court will accordingly be affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 10,594

 11,557

 8,976

 9,640

 8,751

 9,614

 8,194

 6,236

 6,502

 8,226

 10,581

 10,509

 9,881

 10,309

 11,256

 10,572

 10,066

 10,647

 10,653

 9,807

 11,730

 9,934

 11,053

 14,381

 14,477

 13,469

 13,512

 11,011

 10,419

 10,919

 11,165

 3,678

 3,145

 2,838

 2,990

 2,362

 2,592

 2,822

 2,285

 2,082

 2,206

 2,222

 3,175

 2,527

 2,905

 3,541

 4,745

 3,173

 3,493

 4,049

 4,835

 4,476

 4,089

 5,524

 5,494

 5,302

 4,488

 3,142

 3,293

 3,060

 3,556

 3,397

 7,692

 6,359

 5,927

 6,070

 5,423

 5,745

 5,185

 4,132

 4,229

 4,730

 5,070

 6,146

 5,636

 6,483

 6,035

 7,418

 6,795

 7,364

 7,447

 6,704

 7,602

 6,893

 7,704

 9,350

 8,210

 7,966

 6,322

 5,837

 6,529

 7,034

 6,726

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 16, 2010

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
EXHIBIT 32.2



February 28, 2007

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Michael J. Castellano
|Michael J. Castellano       
|Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 641.847 What uniform allowable cost requirements apply to the use of SCSEP funds? ( a ) *General.* Unless specified otherwise in this part or the grant agreement, recipients and sub-recipients must follow the uniform allowable cost requirements that apply to their type of organization. For example, a local government sub-recipient receiving SCSEP funds from a nonprofit organization must use the allowable cost requirements for governmental organizations in OMB Circular A-87. The Department's regulations at 29 CFR 95.27 (non-profit and commercial organizations) and 29 CFR 97.22 (State and local governments) identify the Federal principles for determining allowable costs that each kind of organization must follow. The applicable Federal principles for each kind of organization are described in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(5) of this section. (OAA § 503(f)(2)).
( b ) *Allowable costs/cost principles.* ( 1 ) Allowable costs for State, local, and Indian tribal government organizations must be determined under OMB Circular A-87, “Cost Principles for State, Local and Indian Tribal Governments.”
( 2 ) Allowable costs for nonprofit organizations must be determined under OMB Circular A-122, “Cost Principles for Non-Profit Organizations.”
( 3 ) Allowable costs for institutions of higher education must be determined under OMB Circular A-21, “Cost Principles for Educational Institutions.”
( 4 ) Allowable costs for hospitals must be determined in accordance with appendix E of 45 CFR part 74, “Principles for Determining Costs Applicable to Research and Development Under Grants and Contracts with Hospitals.”
( 5 ) Allowable costs for commercial organizations and those nonprofit organizations listed in Attachment C to OMB Circular A-122 must be determined under the provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), at 48 CFR part 31.