alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4329 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4329

 To amend the Small Business Act to modify determinations of the total 
                       value of contract awards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2016

 Ms. Judy Chu of California (for herself and Mr. Kelly of Mississippi) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Small Business Act to modify determinations of the total 
                       value of contract awards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Small Business 
Goaling Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION TO DETERMINATIONS OF THE TOTAL VALUE OF CONTRACT 
              AWARDS.

    Section 15(g) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Determinations of the total value of contract 
        awards.--For purposes of the goals established under paragraphs 
        (1) and (2), the total value of contract awards for a fiscal 
        year may not be determined in a manner that excludes the value 
        of a contract based on--
                    ``(A) where the contract is awarded;
                    ``(B) where the contract is performed;
                    ``(C) whether the contract is mandated by Federal 
                law to be performed by an entity other than a small 
                business concern;
                    ``(D) whether funding for the contract is made 
                available in an appropriations Act, if the contract is 
                subject to the requirements of chapter 33 of title 41, 
                United States Code, or chapter 137 of title 10, United 
                States Code, and the Federal Acquisition Regulation; or
                    ``(E) whether the contract is otherwise subject to 
                the Federal Acquisition Regulation.''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.471 Assisted recruitment. ( a ) *Requirement of assisted recruitment.* If, as a result of audit or otherwise, the CO determines that a violation has occurred that does not warrant debarment, the CO may require the employer to engage in assisted recruitment for a defined period of time for any future *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification.*
( b ) *Notification of assisted recruitment.* The CO will notify the employer (and its attorney or agent, if applicable) in writing of the assisted recruitment that will be required of the employer for a period of up to 2 years from the date the notice is issued. The notification will state the reasons for the imposition of the additional requirements, state that the employer's agreement to accept the conditions will constitute their inclusion as bona fide conditions and terms of a *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* and offer the employer an opportunity to request an administrative review. If administrative review is requested, the procedures in § 655.461 apply.
( c ) *Assisted recruitment.* The assisted recruitment process will be in addition to any recruitment required of the employer by §§ 655.442 through 655.445 and may consist of, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Requiring the employer to submit a draft advertisement to the CO for review and approval at the time of filing the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification*;
( 2 ) Designating the sources where the employer must recruit for U.S. workers in the Commonwealth and directing the employer to place the advertisement(s) in such sources;
( 3 ) Extending the length of the placement of the advertisements;
( 4 ) Requiring the employer to notify the CO in writing when the advertisement(s) are placed;
( 5 ) Requiring an employer to perform any additional assisted recruitment directed by the CO;
( 6 ) Requiring the employer to provide proof of the publication of all advertisements as directed by the CO;
( 7 ) Requiring the employer to provide proof of all U.S. workers who applied (or on whose behalf an application is made) in response to the employer's recruitment efforts;
( 8 ) Requiring the employer to submit any proof of contact with all referrals and former U.S. workers; or
( 9 ) Requiring the employer to provide any additional documentation verifying it conducted the assisted recruitment as directed by the CO.
( d ) *Failure to comply.* If an employer materially fails to comply with requirements ordered by the CO under this section, the certification will be denied and the employer and its attorney or agent may be debarred under § 655.473.
#### Paul D’Andrea, Respondent, v. Ethel Wilson, Appellant.

Motion to dismiss defendant’s appeal from an order directing her examination before trial and granting other relief, denied, with $10 costs. Plaintiff’s right to a stay under section 1520 of the Civil Practice Act was waived .when he propelled the action onward by restoring it to the trial calendar and by applying for the defendant’s examination. *(Rollins*v. *Carib Syndicate, Ltd.,*172 Mise. 648, affd. 258 App. Div. 816.) Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,203,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  542,141
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,798,531
<PP&E>                                      15,383,499
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,182,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,647,155
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    27,289,432
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,754,557)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,182,030
<SALES>                                        819,525
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               819,525
<CGS>                                          128,613
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  769,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               962,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (518,659)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (518,659)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (518,659)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
### §3963. Foreign Service Schedule

The President shall establish a Foreign Service Schedule which shall consist of 9 salary classes and which shall apply to members of the Service who are citizens of the United States and for whom salary rates are not otherwise provided for by this subchapter. The maximum salary rate for the highest class established under this section, which shall be designated class 1, may not exceed the maximum rate of basic pay prescribed for GS–15 of the General Schedule under section 5332 of title 5. Salary rates established under this section shall be adjusted in accordance with section 5303 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §403, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2088; Pub. L. 101–509, title V, §529 [title I, §101(b)(1)], Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1427, 1439.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Pub. L. 101–509 substituted "section 5303" for "subchapter I of chapter 53".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1990 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 101–509 effective on such date as the President shall determine, but not earlier than 90 days, and not later than 180 days, after Nov. 5, 1990, see section 529 [title I, §305] of Pub. L. 101–509, set out as a note under section 5301 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Effective Date

Section effective Feb. 15, 1981, except that for purposes of implementing section 4151 of this title it is effective Oct. 17, 1980, see section 2403(a) and (d)(2) of Pub. L. 96–465, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3901 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Executive Order No. 12249

Ex. Ord. No. 12249, Oct. 25, 1980, 45 F.R. 71347, which provided for a Foreign Service Schedule, was superseded by Ex. Ord. No. 12330, Oct. 15, 1981, 46 F.R. 50921, formerly set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.

#### Adjustment of Foreign Service Schedule

For adjustment of Foreign Service Schedule pay rates under this section, see the executive order detailing the adjustment of certain rates of pay set out as a note under section 5332 of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.919q Conflict of interest.

All implications of possible conflict of interest between medical or psychological consultants and their medical or psychological practices will be avoided. Such consultants are not only those physicians and psychologists who work for us directly but are also those who do review and adjudication work in the State agencies. Physicians and psychologists who work for us directly as employees or under contract will not work concurrently for a State agency. Physicians and psychologists who do review work for us will not perform consultative examinations for us without our prior approval. In such situations, the physician or psychologist will disassociate himself or herself from further involvement in the case and will not participate in the evaluation, decision, or appeal actions. In addition, neither they, nor any member of their families, will acquire or maintain, either directly or indirectly, any financial interest in a medical partnership, corporation, or similar relationship in which consultative examinations are provided. Sometimes physicians and psychologists who do review work for us will have prior knowledge of a case; for example, when the claimant was a patient. Where this is so, the physician or psychologist will not participate in the review or determination of the case. This does not preclude the physician or psychologist from submitting medical evidence based on treatment or examination of the claimant.

[56 FR 36967, Aug. 1, 1991]
§ 1002.248 What constitutes cause for discharge under USERRA? The employee may be discharged for cause based either on conduct or, in some circumstances, because of the application of other legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons. ( a ) In a discharge action based on conduct, the employer bears the burden of proving that it is reasonable to discharge the employee for the conduct in question, and that he or she had notice, which was express or can be fairly implied, that the conduct would constitute cause for discharge.
( b ) If, based on the application of other legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons, the employee's job position is eliminated, or the employee is placed on layoff status, either of these situations would constitute cause for purposes of USERRA. The employer bears the burden of proving that the employee's job would have been eliminated or that he or she would have been laid off.
### §§1556 to 1556b. Repealed. Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title V, §542(a)(6), 68 Stat. 861

Sections, act June 5, 1950, ch. 220, title III, §§302–304, 64 Stat. 203, related to contributions to United Nations for assistance; authorization of appropriations and advances by R.F.C.; and nature of assistance. See section 2221 of this title.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 28, 2014

t0324 

# Order

Clerk March 28, 2014

148293

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148293

COA: 303248

Ionia CC: 2010

- 014870

- FH

LEON DUANE BRIDINGER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 17, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 949.96

 950.53

 950.88

 951.29

 951.59

 951.81

 952.07

 952.34

 952.55

 952.84

 953.06

 953.34

 953.29

 953.34

 953.52

 953.76

 954.09

 954.33

 954.40

 954.78

 955.06

 955.46

 955.68

 955.81

 956.17

 956.61

 956.67

 956.97

 957.52

 957.48

 957.35

 1,876.3

 1,885.8

 1,891.5

 1,898.3

 1,903.3

 1,907.0

 1,911.3

 1,915.8

 1,919.3

 1,924.2

 1,927.9

 1,932.6

 1,931.7

 1,932.6

 1,935.6

 1,939.7

 1,945.2

 1,949.3

 1,950.5

 1,956.9

 1,961.6

 1,968.5

 1,972.2

 1,974.4

 1,980.6

 1,988.1

 1,989.1

 1,994.3

 2,003.8

 2,003.1

 2,000.8

STORAGE

+9.0

+9.4

+5.8

+6.8

+5.0

+3.7

+4.3

+4.5

+3.5

+4.9

+3.7

+4.7

-0.8

+0.8

+3.0

+4.0

+5.6

+4.1

+1.2

+6.4

+4.7

+6.8

+3.7

+2.2

+6.1

+7.5

+1.0

+5.1

+9.5

-0.7

-2.2

CHANGE

 7,481

 6,854

 6,403

 6,074

 5,509

 4,054

 4,862

 5,125

 4,877

 5,508

 4,941

 5,455

 3,759

 3,973

 3,916

 4,756

 5,233

 4,739

 4,876

 6,286

 5,297

 5,245

 5,247

 4,733

 5,184

 6,086

 4,787

 4,733

 8,433

 3,192

 2,546

INFLOW

 2,892

 2,079

 3,469

 2,624

 2,979

 2,181

 2,654

 2,828

 3,081

 3,047

 3,068

 3,064

 4,159

 3,504

 2,374

 2,705

 2,413

 2,676

 4,264

 3,002

 2,849

 1,750

 3,308

 3,517

 1,984

 2,219

 4,244

 2,099

 3,614

 3,519

 3,610

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 22

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 34

 29

 19

 20

 15

 29

 25

 20

 25

 15

 15

 15

 25

 44

 15

 15

 15

 15

 15

 40

 55

 60

 50

 100

 100

 65

 25

 20

 40

 20

 66

C.F.S.

 .07

 .06

 .04

 .04

 .03

 .06

 .05

 .04

 .05

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .05

 .09

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .03

 .08

 .11

 .12

 .10

 .20

 .20

 .13

 .05

 .04

 .08

 .04

 .13

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .33

 .05

 .03

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2015 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 8, 2015

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +133.3 160,164 91,776 0 22 1,046 2.10 .58

ACRE-FEET +133,300 317,685 182,038 0 44 2,075

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 182,038

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 44

 182,082

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .58

JULY 1, 2014 36.42

 1,867.3

Table 3
#### § 668.380 What will we do to strengthen the capacity of INA grantees to deliver effective services?

We will provide appropriate TAT, as necessary, to INA grantees. This TAT will assist INA grantees to improve program performance and enhance services to the target population(s), as resources permit. (WIA sec. 166(h)(5).)
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.904 Decisions by other governmental agencies and nongovernmental entities.

Other governmental agencies and nongovernmental entities—such as the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, the Department of Labor, the Office of Personnel Management, State agencies, and private insurers—make disability, blindness, employability, Medicaid, workers' compensation, and other benefits decisions for their own programs using their own rules. Because a decision by any other governmental agency or a nongovernmental entity about whether you are disabled, blind, employable, or entitled to any benefits is based on its rules, it is not binding on us and is not our decision about whether you are disabled or blind under our rules. Therefore, in claims filed (see § 416.325) on or after March 27, 2017, we will not provide any analysis in our determination or decision about a decision made by any other governmental agency or a nongovernmental entity about whether you are disabled, blind, employable, or entitled to any benefits. However, we will consider all of the supporting evidence underlying the other governmental agency or nongovernmental entity's decision that we receive as evidence in your claim in accordance with § 416.913(a)(1) through (4).

[82 FR 5874, Jan. 18, 2017, as amended at 82 FR 15132, Mar. 27, 2017]
### §5825. Repealed. Pub. L. 104–66, title I, §1021(e), Dec. 21, 1995, 109 Stat. 713

Section, Pub. L. 102–511, title III, §305, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3335, directed Secretary of Commerce to submit to Congress annual reports describing implementation of business and commercial development provisions, analyzing programs of other industrialized countries, and examining trade practices of other Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development nations.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Travelers Insurance
Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), George
C. Kokulis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Glenn D. Lammey, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ George C. Kokulis
------------------------------------

George C. Kokulis
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004

/s/ Glenn D. Lammey
------------------------------------

Glenn D. Lammey
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       28
### §277d–8. Calexico Mexicali Sanitation Project; operation by Commission; division of costs; contribution by City of Calexico, California

The Secretary of State is authorized, subject to the conditions provided in this section and section 277d–9 of this title, to enter into an agreement with the appropriate official or officials of the United Mexican States for the construction, operation, and maintenance by the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, of a sanitation project for the cities of Calexico, California, and Mexicali, Lower California, Mexico, which agreement shall contain such provisions relating to a division between the two Governments of the cost of such construction and operation and maintenance, or of the work involved therein, as may be recommended by the said Commission and approved by the Government of Mexico and by the Secretary of State on behalf of the Government of the United States: Provided, That no such agreement shall be entered into until the governing body of the city of Calexico, California, has given assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of State that, so long as such agreement remains in force, the city of Calexico will contribute an equitable proportion as determined by the United States Section of said Commission, subject to the approval of the Secretary of State, of the costs of such construction, operation, and maintenance allocated to the United States.

(Sept. 13, 1950, ch. 948, title III, §301, 64 Stat. 848.)
(No. 7050

#### Central Office Equipment Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 9, 1973.*

Central Office Equipment Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 77.38 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■

■ ■

● ★

●

●

●

★

● ● ●

●
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No

. 22

- 1169

STEPHEN R. CROCKETT ,
Petitioner ,

v.

UNITED STATES RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD ,

Respondent

.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on February 28 , 2 0 2 3 , is amended as follows:
On page 13 , line 22 replace " duty to " with " duty

. "
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.184 Applications involving fraud or willful misrepresentation. ( a ) *Referral for investigation.* If the CO discovers possible fraud or willful misrepresentation involving an *Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* the CO may refer the matter to DHS and the Department's Office of the Inspector General for investigation.
( b ) *Sanctions.* If WHD, a court, or DHS determines that there was fraud or willful misrepresentation involving an *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and certification has been granted, a finding under this paragraph (b) will be cause to revoke the certification. The finding of fraud or willful misrepresentation may also constitute a debarrable violation under § 655.182.