alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 438.600 Semi-annual compilation. ( a ) The Commissioner of Social Security will collect and compile the disclosure reports (see appendix B to this part) and, on May 31 and November 30 of each year, submit to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives a report containing a compilation of the information contained in the disclosure reports received during the 6-month period ending on March 31 or September 30, respectively, of that year.
( b ) The report, including the compilation, will be available for public inspection 30 days after receipt of the report by the Secretary and the Clerk.
( c ) Information that involves intelligence matters will be reported only to the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information will not be available for public inspection.
( d ) Information that is classified under Executive Order 12356 or any successor order will be reported only to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives (whichever such committees have jurisdiction of matters involving such information) and to the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives in accordance with procedures agreed to by such committees. Such information will not be available for public inspection.
( e ) The first semi-annual compilation was submitted on May 31, 1990, and contains a compilation of the disclosure reports received from December 23, 1989 to March 31, 1990.
( f ) Major agencies designated by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) were required to provide machine-readable compilations to the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House of Representatives by May 31, 1991. OMB provided detailed specifications in a memorandum to these agencies.
( g ) SSA will keep the originals of all disclosure reports in our official files.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio , Texas** 

May 15, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00075

- CR

Humberto RAMIREZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR11790

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief is hereby GRANTED.

Time is extended to July 8, 2019. Further requests for extensions of time in which to file

appellant’s briefs will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 232

 230

 232

 237

 255

 248

 228

 215

 194

 176

 165

 162

 156

 153

 159

 161

 146

 145

 145

 149

 151

 151

 154

 153

 153

 153

 153

 151

 150

 150

 150

 171

 176

 176

 184

 175

 183

 181

 133

 103

 104

 114

 118

 119

 115

 109

 102

 100

 105

 113

 121

 129

 128

 127

 127

 128

 128

 126

 127

 127

 128

 132

 210

 211

 213

 216

 218

 219

 208

 185

 155

 146

 151

 144

 141

 134

 133

 126

 123

 128

 132

 138

 143

 142

 142

 144

 144

 145

 144

 143

 142

 143

 145

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2016 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: April 12, 2016

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
#### Kathryn F. Crespi, Appellant, v. Albert V. Crespi, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
AFS-14-506-E

July 13, 2015

 Exemption No. 12085

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0659

Mr. Jeff Mallory

Director, Training Operations & Curriculum 

IASCO Flight Training

6460 Lockheed Drive

Redding, CA 96002

Dear Mr. Mallory:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 1, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of IASCO Flight Training (IFT) for an exemption from §§ 61.35(a)(2) 

and 61.156(b)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to 

enable Chinese national citizens enrolled in its approved part 141 pilot school program to 

apply for the FAA airline transport pilot (ATP) multiengine airplane knowledge test, without 

completing the flight simulation training device (FSTD) requirements prescribed in 

§ 61.156(b).

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 11196 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that exempting pilots from the training requirements of § 61.156 would not provide an 

equivalent level of safety. The FAA noted that, as of August 1, 2014, completion of the ATP 

certification training program (CTP) is required to be eligible to take the ATP multiengine 

airplane knowledge test. The FAA found that, although the petitioner’s part 141 approved 

training program contains many of the elements required by § 61.156, it is not an approved 

course of training for the ATP CTP. The FAA has determined that the additional training 
2

required for the multiengine airplane ATP certificate will better prepare a pilot for flying in 

the airline environment and will improve safety and that exempting pilots from training that 

improves safety is not in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that —

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed 

denial of exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, the petition of IASCO Flight Training (IFT) for an 

exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.35(a)(2) and 61.156(b)(1) is hereby denied.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
(No. 74-CC-334

#### Mansion View Lodge, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 8, 1974.*

Mansion View Lodge, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 61.206 Reports by employees and dependents.

The Office may require a claimant to submit reports of facts materially affecting the claimant's entitlement to compensation under the Act. These may include reports of recurrence or termination of disability, of employment and earnings, or of a change in the marital or dependency status of a beneficiary.
### §2595c. Definitions

As used in this subchapter—

(1) the term "INF Treaty" means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (signed at Washington, December 8, 1987);

(2) the term "OSIA" means the On-Site Inspection Agency established by the President, or such other agency as may be designated by the President to carry out the on-site inspection provisions of the INF Treaty;

(3) the term "Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty" means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Underground Nuclear Explosions for Peaceful Purposes (signed at Washington and Moscow, May 28, 1976); and

(4) the term "Threshold Test Ban Treaty" means the Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Limitation of Underground Nuclear Weapons Tests (signed at Moscow, July 3, 1974).

(Pub. L. 87–297, title V, §504, formerly §64, as added Pub. L. 101–216, title II, §201, Dec. 11, 1989, 103 Stat. 1856; renumbered §65 and amended Pub. L. 102–228, title IV, §402(a)(2), (b)(1), Dec. 12, 1991, 105 Stat. 1699; renumbered §504 and amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1223(20), (21), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–772.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Par. (1). Pub. L. 105–277, §1223(20), inserted "of America" after "United States".

1991—Pars. (3), (4). Pub. L. 102–228, §402(a)(2), added pars. (3) and (4).

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
### §3423. United States contributions to costs

#### (a) United States share of the costs

In accordance with the agreement set forth in the exchanges of letters between the United States and Egypt and between the United States and Israel which were signed on August 3, 1981, the United States share of the costs of the Multinational Force and Observers—

(1) shall not exceed 60 per centum of the budget for the expenses connected with the establishment and initial operation of the Multinational Force and Observers during the period ending September 30, 1982; and

(2) shall not exceed 331/3 per centum of the budget for the annual operating expenses of the Multinational Force and Observers for each financial year beginning after that date.

#### (b) Authorization of appropriations

(1) There are authorized to be appropriated to the President to carry out chapter 6 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 [22 U.S.C. 2348 et seq.], in addition to amounts otherwise available to carry out that chapter, $125,000,000 for the fiscal year 1982 for use in paying the United States contribution to the budget of the Multinational Force and Observers. Amounts appropriated under this subsection are authorized to remain available until expended.

(2) Expenditures made pursuant to section 138 of the joint resolution entitled "Joint resolution making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1982, and for other purposes", approved October 1, 1981 (Public Law 97–51), or pursuant to any subsequent corresponding provision applicable to the fiscal year 1982, shall be charged to the appropriation authorized by this subsection.

#### (c) Reimbursements to the United States

Unless required by law, reimbursements to the United States by the Multinational Force and Observers shall be on the basis of identifiable costs actually incurred as a result of requirements imposed by the Multinational Force and Observers, and shall not include administrative surcharges.

(Pub. L. 97–132, §4, Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1694.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, referred to in subsec. (b)(1), is Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424. Chapter 6 of part II of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 is classified to part VI (§2348 et seq.) of subchapter II of chapter 32 of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

Section 138 of the joint resolution entitled "Joint resolution making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1982, and for other purposes", approved October 1, 1981 (Public Law 97–51), referred to in subsec. (b)(2), is section 138 of Pub. L. 97–51, Oct. 1, 1981, 95 Stat. 967, which is not classified to the Code.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4361 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4361

 To amend section 3554 of title 44, United States Code, to provide for 
    enhanced security of Federal information systems, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2016

  Mr. Palmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 3554 of title 44, United States Code, to provide for 
    enhanced security of Federal information systems, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Federal Information Systems 
Safeguards Act of 2016''.

SEC. 2. AGENCY DISCRETION TO SECURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND 
              INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

    Section 3554 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Agency Discretion.--The head of each agency has the sole and 
exclusive authority, with respect to any information technology or 
information system under the control of such agency--
            ``(1) to take any action the agency determines to be 
        necessary to reduce or eliminate security weakness and risk, 
        including to protect the information contained in the 
        information technology or information system; and
            ``(2) to take any action the agency determines to be 
        necessary to reduce or eliminate future security weakness and 
        risk, including to protect the information contained in the 
        information technology or information system.''.
                                 <all>
```
### §§1311 to 1313. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section 1311, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title III, §321, 60 Stat. 150, which related to equality in internal taxes for United States products coming into the Philippines, was omitted on authority of section 1291(b)(1) of this title which provided that this subchapter be effective until the expiration of the revised agreement between the United States and the Republic of the Philippines which occurred on July 4, 1974.

Section 1312, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title III, §322, 60 Stat. 150, prohibited export taxes by the Philippines on articles exported to the United States. See note above for section 1311 of this title.

Section 1313, act Apr. 30, 1946, ch. 244, title III, §323, 60 Stat. 150, provided an exemption from taxes for articles for official use of the United States Government. See note above for section 1311 of this title.
### §3774. Delays for which no responsibility is assumed

The Commission is not responsible, and may not consider any claim, for demurrage or delays caused by—

(1) landslides or other natural causes;

(2) necessary construction or maintenance work on Canal locks, terminals, or equipment;

(3) obstruction arising from accidents;

(4) time necessary for admeasurement;

(5) congestion of traffic;

(6) investigation of a marine accident that is conducted within 24 hours after the accident occurs, except that any liability of the Commission beyond that 24-hour period shall be limited to the extent to which the accident was caused, or contributed to, by the negligence of an employee of the Commission acting within the scope of the employee's official duties; or

(7) except as specially set forth in this subpart, any other cause.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1414, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 486; Pub. L. 99–209, §3, Dec. 23, 1985, 99 Stat. 1717.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1985—Par. (6). Pub. L. 99–209 amended par. (6) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (6) read as follows: "time necessary for investigation of marine accidents; or".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1985 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 99–209 applicable to any claim arising on or after Dec. 23, 1985, see section 7(b)(1) of Pub. L. 99–209, set out as a note under section 3771 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 176

 176

 176

 201

 242

 187

 168

 168

 168

 175

 171

 163

 167

 180

 194

 193

 247

 229

 214

 203

 217

 177

 216

 189

 188

 187

 199

 181

 220

 203

 226

 173

 173

 171

 163

 150

 161

 161

 162

 162

 160

 158

 157

 156

 156

 156

 157

 158

 159

 159

 160

 163

 162

 162

 161

 161

 161

 162

 161

 161

 161

 161

 174

 174

 173

 172

 178

 165

 163

 164

 163

 163

 161

 159

 158

 159

 162

 163

 177

 168

 169

 167

 171

 166

 169

 165

 164

 164

 165

 164

 169

 168

 173

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 4, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 18, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31175 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDWARD D. MITCHELL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CR-30026-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * James H. Looney, court-appointed counsel for Edward D. Mitchell, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mitchell has filed a response arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue at sentencing that Mitchell was not a leader or organizer under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a). Our review of the briefs and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leaveNo. 01-31175 -2- to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Rochelle: 

Thank you for providing the revised 114 survey form for our review. I have attached 

for your consideration the draft survey form with a few further comments included in 

Red Text under the relevant questions. In summary the comments include: 

- The need to add "plant manager" to list of responsible officials (page 1 

footnote) 

- For Part F, EPA should clarify that this section applies only to collocated 

HAP sources (and not all collocated sources). (Pages 19, 20 and 22) 

- Under 43(e), EPA should clarify that they are requesting HF emission data 

specifically from furnaces. (page 27) 

- The request for startup and shutdown requests is still way too broad (see 

comment page 28) 

- Tables 36 (b) and 36 (c) (page 18) appear repetitive of Tables 35 (b) and 

(c) (pages 15 an 16) 

- There is concern that listing the numerous individual gas-fired HAP emitting 

non-subpart RRR sources in the Tables for 35 & 36 (b & c) would add considerable 

effort to the survey. We request that this section be modified by either (a) 

setting a HAP reporting threshold emission rate of 0.1 tons per year per source for 

gas-fired equipment, or (b) allowing a single reporting for all other gas-fired 

sources combined that are not under subpart RRR. 

Please let me know if there are any questions. 

Regards, 

Bob Strieter 

VP - EHS 

The Aluminum Association 

bstriete@aluminum.org

703 358-2980 

cell 571 224-6598 

1525 Wilson Blvd 

From: Robert Strieter <rstrieter@aluminum.org> 

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: mikepalazzolo <michael.palazzolo@alcoa.com>, "jason Perdion (jperdion@bakerlaw.com)" <jperdion@bakerlaw.com> 

Date: 06/29/2010 02:34 PM 

Subject: RE: Revised 114 Request

Page 1 of 2

mhtml:file://\\rtifile02.rcc_nt.rti.org\ehe\Projects\0210426-EPA_SPPD_(Opt4)\0210426.00... 1/10/2012
Suite 600 

Arlington, VA 22209 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:00 PM 

To: Robert Strieter 

Cc: Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com 

Subject: Revised 114 Request 

This is our recent version of the 114. If you plan to comment, we need to have the 

comments no later than next Tuesday by C.O.B. 

Thanks 

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 

Mail Drop D243-02 

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207 

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov

Page 2 of 2

mhtml:file://\\rtifile02.rcc_nt.rti.org\ehe\Projects\0210426-EPA_SPPD_(Opt4)\0210426.00... 1/10/2012
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.400 Scope and purpose of this subpart. ( a ) *Purpose.* ( 1 ) A temporary labor certification (TLC) issued under this subpart reflects a determination by the Secretary of Labor (Secretary), pursuant to 48 U.S.C. 1806(d)(2)(A), that: ( i ) There are not sufficient U.S. workers in the Commonwealth who are able, willing, and qualified and who will be available at the time and place needed to perform the services or labor for which an employer desires to hire foreign workers; and
( ii ) The employment of the CNMI-Only Transitional Worker visa program (CW-1) nonimmigrant worker(s) will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of U.S. workers similarly employed.
( 2 ) This subpart describes the process by which the Department of Labor (Department or DOL) makes such a determination and certifies its determination to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart sets forth the procedures governing the labor certification process for the employment of foreign workers in the CW-1 nonimmigrant classification, as defined in 48 U.S.C. 1806(d). It also establishes standards and obligations with respect to the terms and conditions of the temporary labor certification (TLC) with which CW-1 employers must comply, as well as the rights and obligations of CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding employment. Additionally, this subpart sets forth integrity measures for ensuring employers' continued compliance with the terms and conditions of the TLC.