alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert B. Kegerreis, Appellant, v. Joseph Sirotkin et al., Defendants. Richard M. Cantor, Original Attorney for Plaintiff, Respondent.

• Order of March 11, 1946, as resettled by order of July 30, 1946, granting motion for substitution of an attorney, modified on the law and the facts by striking out the last two ordering paragraphs and by substituting in lieu thereof the last ordering paragraph in the original order of March 11, 1946. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. Order of August 7, 1946, as resettled by order of September 16, 1946, fixing amount of compensation and disbursements and providing for payment, modified on the law and the facts by striking out the last ordering paragraph, hy reducing the compensation and disbursements of the original attorney from $766.40 to $366.40, and by providing for payment of the reduced amount in accordance with the resettled order made March 11, 1946, as modified. As so modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. There could be no material change in the order of March 11, 1946, under the guise of resettlement and after the time to appeal therefrom had expired. *(Buland*V. *Tuthill,*187 App. Div. 314, 315.) In any event, we are of opinion that in this negligence action compensation of the original attorney, who had been retained on a contingent basis, should be made payable out of the proceeds of the action. In the light of all the proof, we are of opinion that the allowance was excessive. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1043 Performance accuracy standard. ( a ) *General.* Performance accuracy refers to the percentage of cases that do not have to be returned to State agencies for further development or correction of decisions based on evidence in the files and as such represents the reliability of State agency adjudication. The definition of performance accuracy includes the measurement of factors that have a potential for affecting a decision, as well as the correctness of the decision. For example, if a particular item of medical evidence should have been in the file but was not included, even though its inclusion does not change the result in the case, that is a performance error. Performance accuracy, therefore, is a higher standard than decisional accuracy. As a result, the percentage of correct decisions is significantly higher than what is reflected in the error rate established by SSA's quality assurance system.
( b ) *Target level.* The State agency initial performance accuracy target level for combined title II and title XVI cases is 97 percent with a corresponding decision accuracy rate of 99 percent.
( c ) *Intermediate goals.* These goals will be established annually by SSA's regional commissioner after negotiation with the State and should be used as stepping stones to progress towards our targeted level of performance.
( d ) *Threshold levels.* The State agency initial performance accuracy threshold level for combined title II and title XVI cases is 90.6 percent.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Redpoint Bio Corporation:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-146295 on Form S-8 of Redpoint Bio Corporation of our reports
dated March 14, 2008, with respect to the balance sheets of Redpoint Bio Corporation as of December 31, 2006 and 2007, and the related statements of operations, redeemable convertible
preferred stock and stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and for the period from August 16,
1995 (inception) to December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007
annual report on Form 10-K of Redpoint Bio Corporation.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania
March 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.433 Notice of Acceptance. ( a ) *Notification.* When the CO determines the *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* contains no errors or inaccuracies, and meets the requirements set forth in this subpart, the CO will issue a NOA to the employer and, if applicable, the employer's attorney or agent.
( b ) *Notice content.* The NOA must: ( 1 ) Direct the employer to engage in recruitment of U.S. workers as provided in §§ 655.442 through 655.444, including any additional recruitment ordered by the CO under § 655.445;
( 2 ) State that such employer-conducted recruitment must begin within 14 calendar days from the date the NOA is issued, consistent with § 655.440(b);
( 3 ) Require the employer to submit a report of its recruitment efforts, by the date required by the CO in the NOA, as specified in § 655.446; and
( 4 ) Advise the employer that failure to submit a complete recruitment report by the deadline will lead to denial of the application.
#### Joseph Sullivan v. Wilhelm Knauth and Others.

Motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
#### Michael Anzaldo, Respondent, v. Mariantonia Rini, Appellant.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
ACCEPTED

06-15-00051-CV

SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS

TEXARKANA, TEXAS

12/4/2015 3:45:05 PM

DEBBIE AUTREY

CLERK

 FILED IN 6th COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 12/4/2015 3:45:05 PM DEBBIE AUTREY Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SGI
International's Form 10-QSB for the nine month period ended September 30, 1999,
and is qualified in its entirely by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000737955
<NAME>                        SGI International
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    0


<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.000
<CASH>                                          212,002
<SECURITIES>                                    402,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                   730,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                     79,460
<INVENTORY>                                      65,120
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              1,364,624
<PP&E>                                        1,721,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,234,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,158,962
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,764,168
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           196,672
<PREFERRED>                                         604
<COMMON>                                     49,216,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  (53,289,368)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,158,962
<SALES>                                       2,790,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,943,608
<CGS>                                         1,710,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,710,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              4,061,787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              474,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4,078,633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4,078,633)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,078,633)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.12)





</TABLE>
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4245 

AN ACT 

To exempt exportation of certain echinoderms and mollusks 

from licensing requirements under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 4245 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF EXPORTATION OF CERTAIN 

2 ECHINODERMS AND MOLLUSKS FROM PER3 MISSION AND LICENSING REQUIREMENTS. 

4 (a) EXEMPTION.—Not later than 30 days after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the 

6 United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall amend sec7 tion 14.92 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, to 

8 clarify that— 

9 (1) fish or wildlife described in subsection (b) 

10 are fishery products exempt from the export permis11 sion requirements of section 9(d)(1) of the Endan12 gered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1538(d)(1)); 

13 and 

14 (2) any person may engage in business as an 

15 exporter of such fish or wildlife without procuring 

16 permission under such section of that Act or an ex17 port license under subpart I of part 14 of such title. 

18 (b) COVERED FISH OR WILDLIFE.—The fish or wild19 life referred to in subsection (a) are members of the phy20 lum Echinodermata that are commonly known as sea ur21 chins and sea cucumbers, and members of the phylum 

22 Mollusca that are commonly known as squid, octopus, and 

23 cuttlefish, including products thereof, that— 

24 (1) do not require a permit under part 16, 17, 

25 or 23 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations; 
3 

•HR 4245 EH

1 (2) are harvested in waters under the jurisdic2 tion of the United States or are processed in the 

3 United States; and 

4 (3) are— 

5 (A) exported for purposes of human or ani6 mal consumption; or 

7 (B) taken in waters under the jurisdiction 

8 of the United States or on the high seas for 

9 recreational purposes. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 6, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4245 

AN ACT 

To exempt exportation of certain echinoderms and 

Endangered Species Act of 1973. mollusks from licensing requirements under the
§ 618.898 Applicable State law. ( a ) The applicable State law for an AAW remains the applicable State law for such worker until such worker becomes entitled to UI under the State law of another State (whether or not such worker files a UI claim in that other State).
( b ) For purposes of determining the applicable State law for UI entitlement: ( 1 ) A worker is deemed entitled to UI under a State law if such worker satisfies the base period employment and wage qualifying requirements of such State law;
( 2 ) In the case of a combined-wage claim, UI entitlement must be determined under the law of the paying State; and
( 3 ) In case of a Federal UI claim, or a joint State and Federal UI claim, UI entitlement must be determined under the law of the applicable State for such claims.
#### § 404.995 Finality of findings when later claim is filed on same earnings record.

If two claims for benefits are filed on the same earnings records, findings of fact made in a determination on the first claim may be revised in determining or deciding the second claim, even though the time limit for revising the findings made in the first claim has passed. However, a finding in connection with a claim that a person was fully or currently insured at the time of filing an application, at the time of death, or any other pertinent time, may be revised only under the conditions stated in § 404.988.
Oe/29/201 0 15:5 2 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS ElOOI/OOl 

Stuart S. MacPherson ' ''' ^ ^'OCKBT 

P.O. Box 807 

Cardi/r, Calif. 92007 

June 18, 2007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Dcpt. of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. x 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 , ,^ . /^/ly/ l /l<"-? ^ 

Washington, B.C. 20590 [iP/DUJPO ^ ^ / d-O/U'OS> ^56 

Dear Judge Goodwin, 

1 am in receipt of a Notice of Assignment of Proceeding for Case No. 2009WP910116 

which informs mc that you will be the presiding Judge in this hearing. As you are based 

in Washington D.C. I must assume that the hearing will be taking place in that city. As 

travel to Washington, D.C. and time away from my home in San Diego will present an 

undue hardship I respectfiilly request, as did Laura Ponto, Complainant's Counsel, that 

the hearing for the above-referenced proceeding be held in San Diego. 

Ihank you lor your consideration in this matter. 

lart S. MacPherson
#### § 418.2310 When may you request that we make a new initial determination?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1310, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
### subpart iv—retirement
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 979.40

 979.00

 978.56

 978.14

 977.72

 977.40

 977.07

 976.58

 976.12

 975.58

 975.13

 974.64

 974.21

 973.67

 973.17

 972.66

 971.99

 971.30

 970.85

 970.42

 970.04

 969.62

 969.28

 968.99

 968.72

 968.39

 968.16

 967.99

 967.79

 967.64

 2,404.3

 2,396.5

 2,388.0

 2,379.9

 2,371.8

 2,365.6

 2,359.2

 2,349.9

 2,341.0

 2,330.7

 2,322.2

 2,312.9

 2,304.7

 2,294.6

 2,285.1

 2,275.6

 2,263.0

 2,250.2

 2,241.8

 2,233.9

 2,226.8

 2,219.1

 2,212.8

 2,207.5

 2,202.6

 2,196.5

 2,192.3

 2,189.2

 2,185.6

 2,182.9

STORAGE

-6.0

-7.8

-8.5

-8.1

-8.1

-6.2

-6.4

-9.4

-8.8

-10.3

-8.6

-9.3

-8.1

-10.2

-9.4

-9.6

-12.5

-12.8

-8.4

-8.0

-7.0

-7.7

-6.3

-5.3

-4.9

-6.0

-4.2

-3.1

-3.6

-2.7

CHANGE

 3,541

 3,001

 3,776

 4,095

 4,009

 4,823

 4,478

 3,442

 3,222

 3,042

 3,000

 3,418

 3,331

 3,044

 2,622

 3,270

 1,878

 1,541

 2,970

 3,354

 2,999

 3,033

 3,959

 3,750

 3,336

 2,865

 2,709

 2,235

 2,359

 2,908

INFLOW

 6,369

 6,759

 7,862

 8,055

 7,920

 7,761

 7,093

 7,980

 7,479

 8,055

 7,148

 7,936

 7,269

 8,037

 7,213

 7,928

 8,065

 7,841

 7,114

 7,333

 6,464

 6,779

 6,990

 6,305

 5,707

 5,796

 4,706

 3,679

 4,070

 4,203

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 404

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 217

 171

 211

 142

 176

 170

 186

 197

 185

 179

 173

 167

 167

 144

 155

 165

 137

 175

 71

 33

 81

 152

 124

 135

 119

 113

 124

 123

 123

 80

C.F.S.

 .38

 .30

 .37

 .25

 .31

 .30

 .33

 .35

 .33

 .32

 .31

 .30

 .30

 .26

 .28

 .30

 .25

 .32

 .13

 .06

 .15

 .28

 .23

 .25

 .22

 .21

 .23

 .23

 .23

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2004 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 22, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -227.3 96,010 205,916 0 404 4,395 7.93 .02

ACRE-FEET -227,300 190,436 408,434 0 801 8,717

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 408,434

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 801

 409,235

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .02

JULY 1, 2004 .02

 2,410.4

Table 3
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACKROCK KELSO CAPITAL CORPORATION



|                       |  |              |          | 
|---------------------- |  | ------------ | -------- | 
|Name                   |  | Jurisdiction |         
|BKC ARS Blocker, Inc.  |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC ASW Blocker, Inc.  |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC CSP Blocker, Inc.  |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC DVSH Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC MTCH Blocker, Inc. |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC Sentry LLC.        |  |              | Delaware | 
|BKC WBS, LLC.          |  |              | Delaware | 

In addition, we may be deemed to control certain portfolio companies identified as Controlled
Investments in footnotes to the Consolidated Schedule of Investments at December 31, 2014 included in the Consolidated Financial Statements portion of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2014.
EXHIBIT 32.2



               CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended June 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Diane C.A. Rosler, Chief Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Corporation as of and for the period covered
        by the Report.



                                  /s/ Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Diane C.A. Rosler
                                  Senior Vice President and
                                  Chief Financial Officer


August 7, 2009
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fay Siegel, Appellant.

Carswell, Johnston, Adel, Taylor and Lewis, JJ., concur.
#### § 404.972 Effect of dismissal of request for Appeals Council review.

The dismissal of a request for Appeals Council review is binding and not subject to further review.
### §286xx. Quota increase

#### (a) In general

The United States Governor of the Fund may consent to an increase in the quota of the United States in the Fund equivalent to 40,871,800,000 Special Drawing Rights.

#### (b) Subject to appropriations

The authority provided by subsection (a) shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §72, as added Pub. L. 114–113, div. K, title IX, §9002, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2830.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001011451
<NAME> MECHANICAL DYNAMICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          17,122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (324)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,682
<PP&E>                                           7,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (4,180)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,186
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,142
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,535
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,186
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,253
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (415)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    150
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (459)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                611
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       611
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10


</TABLE>
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0798

SAT Date: 8/16/2013

Print Date: 9/30/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: Analogs: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: No exposures needed

Ecotox:

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0798

FATE: 

log Koc = 1.84 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.09 (E)

log Fish BAF = 0.53 (E) 
POTW removal (%) = 0 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate

PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Not absorbed through the skin as the neat material; poor

absorption through the skin if in solution; moderate absorption from the lung and GI tract 

(pchem). No significant health concerns.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 2.4

fish _ chronic value 0.17

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

2.4

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for ; SAR chemical class = 

; MW 

; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

14

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 537

 535

 554

 560

 542

 540

 541

 540

 553

 554

 572

 581

 581

 596

 590

 619

 590

 601

 527

 551

 646

 730

 791

 601

 615

 767

 753

 810

 951

 959

 423

 414

 424

 439

 396

 410

 427

 430

 445

 416

 405

 443

 470

 464

 483

 450

 424

 340

 360

 361

 367

 370

 349

 376

 386

 399

 466

 555

 558

 700

 480

 467

 477

 484

 473

 471

 481

 497

 501

 479

 496

 512

 523

 534

 534

 532

 489

 478

 451

 443

 500

 500

 499

 491

 507

 551

 585

 661

 760

 830

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 5, 2000

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

FARRAR PARK AT DUTCH SLOUGH