alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund II and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      29,205,910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,318<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,255,671<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,255,671<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,221,353<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,524,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                696,801
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            696,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   696,801
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $93,282 and due
from DWR of $59,036.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,897,443.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $461,143, accrued
management fees of $103,689, accrued administrative expenses
of $45,194 and accrued incentive fees of $26,402.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $1,835,037, net
change in unrealized of $(158,709) and interest income of $545,025.
</FN>


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 238.60

 238.60

 238.63

 238.82

 238.60

 240.63

 240.30

 239.43

 239.95

 240.00

 239.90

 239.84

 239.57

 239.61

 242.55

 241.68

 241.49

 241.71

 243.25

 243.01

 242.05

 242.23

 242.91

 242.04

 241.23

 243.90

 242.47

 241.20

 246.67

 242.82

 242.68

 309

 309

 312

 332

 309

 557

 511

 402

 464

 470

 458

 451

 418

 423

 858

 713

 684

 718

 985

 938

 772

 803

 920

 770

 644

 1,111

 844

 639

 1,758

 905

 881

STORAGE

-1

+0

+3

+20

-23

+248

-46

-109

+62

+6

-12

-7

-33

+5

+435

-145

-29

+34

+267

-47

-166

+31

+117

-150

-126

+467

-267

-205

+1,119

-853

-24

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 7,290

 7,310

 7,520

 8,090

 7,810

 14,800

 12,600

 9,730

 12,500

 12,100

 11,100

 11,200

 10,400

 11,000

 21,800

 19,100

 18,500

 20,700

 23,000

 23,200

 20,700

 20,800

 23,000

 20,100

 16,900

 27,100

 21,900

 17,200

 48,500

 23,100

 23,000

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2010 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: January 3, 2011

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS +571 0 532,050

ACRE-FEET +571 0 1,055,321

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 1,055,321

 310

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CORNING CANAL 0

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 0

TO SACTO RIVER 1,055,321
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)   In connection with the Annual Report of High Plains Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brandon Hargett, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:  1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/Brandon Hargett  Chief Financial Officer April 16, 2012
### §286w. Denial of membership or other status in Fund for Palestine Liberation Organization; United States participation in Fund if membership or other status granted; report by President to Congress

It is the policy of the United States that the Palestine Liberation Organization should not be given membership in the Fund or be given observer status or any other official status at any meeting sponsored by or associated with the Fund. The United States Executive Director of the Fund shall promptly notify the Fund of such policy.

In the event that the Fund provides either membership, observer status, or any other official status to the Palestine Liberation Organization, such action would result in a serious diminution of United States support. Upon review of such action, the President would be required to report his recommendations to the Congress with regard to any further United States participation in the Fund.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §37, as added Pub. L. 96–389, §7, Oct. 7, 1980, 94 Stat. 1554.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 7, 1980, see section 12 of Pub. L. 96–389, set out as a note under section 286s of this title.
Exhibit 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Enable IPC Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 30, 2008





/s/ David A. Walker

David A. Walker

Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and

Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





-41-
----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Annual Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 12, 2006
| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Avery Pack, President and        Chief Executive Officer        (Principal Executive Officer) and        Acting Chief Financial Officer        (Principal Financial Officer and        Principal Accounting Officer) |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4142 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4142

 To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to increase the authorization of funds 
               for trade adjustment assistance for firms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 1, 2015

 Mr. Aguilar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to increase the authorization of funds 
               for trade adjustment assistance for firms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Displaced Jobs Relief Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED AUTHORIZATION FOR TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR 
              FIRMS.

    Section 255(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2345(a)) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``$16,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$50,000,000''; and
            (2) by striking ``2015'' and inserting ``2016''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 411.120 What is a ticket under the Ticket to Work program? ( a ) A ticket under the Ticket to Work program is a document which provides evidence of the Commissioner's agreement to pay, under the rules in subpart H of this part, an employment network (EN) or a State VR agency to which a disabled beneficiary's ticket is assigned, for providing employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, and other support services to the beneficiary.
( b ) The left side of the ticket includes the beneficiary's name, ticket number, claim account number, and the date we issued the ticket. The ticket number is 12 characters and comprises the beneficiary's own social security number, the letters “TW,” and a number (1, 2, etc.) in the last position signifying that this is the first ticket, second ticket, etc., that the beneficiary has received.
( c ) The right side of the ticket includes the signature of the Commissioner of Social Security and provides a description of the Ticket to Work program. The description of the program will tell you how you may offer the ticket to an EN or State VR agency. The description will also tell you how the EN provides services to you.
[66 FR 67420, Dec. 28, 2001, as amended at 73 FR 29339, May 20, 2008]
#### Joseph Brinckle v. Nellie Stitts.

Filed December 9, 1897.

No. 7662.

1. Assignments of Error: Motion for New Trial. Errors in a petition in error must be assigned separately and this rule is not complied with by an assignment that there was error in overruling the motion for a new trial where such motion embraces several distinct complaints of errors.

*112. Instructions: Exceptions: Review. Where a party did not except to the refusal of the trial court to give an instruction requested by such party he cannot be heard to complain of the refusal in the supreme court.

3. Review: Exclusion oe Evidence: Bill oe Exceptions. Error alleged as to the exclusion from the jury of the whole or a part of an alleged book of original entries cannot be .considered in the supreme court when the book is not to be found in connection with the bill of exceptions.

4. Depositions: Oh.iection to Answer. An answer'to an interrogatory in a deposition contained both competent and incompetent testimony. *Held,*That an objection was properly sustained to the entire answer.

Error from tlie district court of Fillmore county. Tried below before Hastings, J.

*Affirmed.*

*J dim D. Carson,*for plaintiff in error.

*Charles H. Sloan, contra.*

Ryan, C.

This was an action for compensation for personal services rendered for plaintiff in error by the defendant in error. There was a verdict as prayed to the amount of $200, for which amount, with costs, a judgment was duly rendered by the district court of Fillmore county. In the petition in error there was no assignment as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. It is true this was made the ground of one of the several complaints urged in the motion for a new trial, and in the petition in error the overruling of the motion for a new trial in a general way was assigned as error. This, however, presented no question as to any one of the several errors alleged in the motion for a new trial. *(City of Chadron v. Glover,*43 Neb., 732; *Glaze v. Parcel,*40 Neb., 732; *Stein v. Vannice,*44 Neb., 132; *Sigler v. McConnell,*45 Neb., 598; *Conger v. Dodd,*45 Neb., 36.)

It is urged in argument that the district court erred in its refusal to give the fourth instruction asked by the *12plaintiff in error. There was no exception to this ruling; hence we cannot determine whether dr not there was error in such refusal. It is urged that an alleged book of original entries was improperly excluded from the consideration of the jury. Unfortunately, this book does not appear in connection with the bill of exceptions, and we therefore cannot determine whether or not there was error in excluding portions of it.

The final assignment is that there was error in excluding as evidence the answer to the fourth interrogatory in the deposition of J. F. Steenrod. In this answer there was some competent testimony, but this was in connection with testimony which was clearly incompetent. The district court therefore properly excluded the entire answer of the witness.

There was assigned no other error, and it follows that the judgment of the.district court is

Affirmed.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Company for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date:  May 15, 2006


By:   /S/ EDWARD C. HALL
    -----------------------------
          Edward C. Hall
          Chief Financial Officer



                                       26
Exhibit 11

                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                      Nine Month Period Ended,              Quarter Ended
                          September 30,                     September 30,
                        1997         1996                1997            1996
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                     <C>          <C>                 <C>          <C>
Earnings Per share:
  Primary               $1.50        $1.16               $0.57        $0.32
  Fully diluted         $1.50        $1.16               $0.57        $0.32

</TABLE>

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are calculated using the following
number of adjusted weighted average shares outstanding:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                       Nine Month Period Ended,            Quarter Ended
                           September 30,                   September 30, 
                        1997         1996              1997            1996
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                     <C>          <C>               <C>          <C>
Earnings Per share:
  Primary               $6,022,732   $6,001,333        $6,045,563   $5,988,740
  Fully diluted         $6,053,684   $6,001,240        $6,059,813   $5,994,730
</TABLE>

The weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted to recognize the
dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding employee stock options on both a
primary and fully diluted basis.

The calculations of earnings per share above are based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding, adjusted for the 5% stock dividend paid August 8, 
1997, including all common stock and common stock equivalents in conformity with
the instructions for Item 601 of Regulation S-K. The calculation of earnings per
share for financial reporting purposes is based on the weighted average number 
of shares outstanding of 5,977,814 and 5,953,513 at September 30, 1997 and 
September 30, 1996, respectively, without giving effect to the common stock 
equivalents resulting from the assumed exercise of stock options, which do not 
dilute earnings per share by more than 3 percent, in conformity with generally 
accepted accounting principles.
EXHIBIT 32.1



             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and CEO,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
        all material respects, the financial condition and results
        of operations of the Corporation as of and for the period
        covered by the Report.





                                  /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                  J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                  President and CEO


November 8, 2005


                                28
§ 411.655 How will the PM refer the dispute to us? The PM has 20 working days from the failure to come to a mutually agreeable solution with an EN to refer the dispute to us with all relevant information. The information should include: ( a ) A description of the disputed issue(s);
( b ) A summary of the EN's and PM's position related to each disputed issue; and
( c ) A description of any solutions proposed by the EN and PM when the EN sought resolution through the PM's grievance procedures, including the reasons each party rejected each proposed solution.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laidlaw International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officers knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. Date: April 11, 2005 /s/ Kevin E. BensonName:
    Kevin E. BensonTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Douglas A. CartyName:
    Douglas A. CartyTitle:  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as a part of this report or on a separate disclosure document.
### §1938. Repealed. July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §8(m), 70 Stat. 559

Section, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, title IV, §418, as added July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §8(j), 69 Stat. 287, authorized the establishment of President's Fund for Asian Economic Development.
§ 498.211 Form, filing and service of papers. ( a ) *Form.* ( 1 ) Unless the ALJ directs the parties to do otherwise, documents filed with the ALJ will include an original and two copies.
( 2 ) Every document filed in the proceeding will contain a caption setting forth the title of the action, the case number, and a designation of the pleading or paper.
( 3 ) Every document will be signed by, and will contain the address and telephone number of the party or the person on whose behalf the document was filed, or his or her representative.
( 4 ) Documents are considered filed when they are mailed.
( b ) *Service.* A party filing a document with the ALJ will, at the time of filing, serve a copy of such document on every other party. Service upon any party of any document will be made by delivering a copy, or placing a copy of the document in the United States mail, postage prepaid and addressed, or with a private delivery service, to the party's last known address. When a party is represented by an attorney, service will be made upon such attorney. Proof of service should accompany any document filed with the ALJ.
( c ) *Proof of service.* A certificate of the individual serving the document by personal delivery or by mail, setting forth the manner of service, will be proof of service.
[61 FR 65470, Dec. 13, 1996]
Exhibit 23.1


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in the
Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-XXXXX) and related Prospectus of Aphton
Corporation for the registration of 5,000,000 shares of its common stock and to
the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated March 21, 2002, with
respect to the financial statements of Aphton Corporation included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the eleven months ended December 31, 2001, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                                    /s/ Ernst & Young LLP



Miami, FL
July 5, 2002
(No. 6987

#### Wayne Davenport and Kenneth Davenport, d/b/a Davenport Builders, A Partnership, Claimants, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of General Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 26, 1972.*

Charles J. Gramlich, Attorney for Claimants.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.