57542 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

§ 703.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 703.1 as follows: 

■ a. In paragraph (b)(5) by removing the 

word ‘‘or’’; 

■ b. In paragraph (b)(6) by removing the 

period at the end of the paragraph and 

adding ‘‘; or’’ in its place; and 

■ c. By adding paragraph (b)(7). 

The addition reads as follows: 

§ 703.1 Purpose and scope. 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(7) Funding a Charitable Donation 

Account pursuant to § 721.3(b) of this 

chapter. 

* * * * * 

PART 721—INCIDENTAL POWERS 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 721 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1757(17), 1766, 1789. 

■ 4. In § 721.3, redesignate paragraph (b) 

as paragraph (b)(1) and add paragraph 

(b)(2) to read as follows: 

§ 721.3 What categories of activities are 

preapproved as incidental powers 

necessary or requisite to carry on a credit 

union’s business? 

* * * * * 

(b) * * * 

(2) Charitable Donation Accounts. A 

charitable income account (‘‘CDA’’) is a 

hybrid charitable and investment 

vehicle, satisfying the conditions in 

paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (vii) of this 

section, that you may fund as a means 

to provide charitable contributions and 

donations to qualified charities. If you 

fund a CDA that satisfies all of the 

following conditions, then you may do 

so free from the investment limitations 

of the Federal Credit Union Act and part 

703 of this chapter: 

(i) Maximum aggregate funding. The 

book value of your investments in all 

CDAs, in the aggregate, as carried on 

your statement of financial condition 

prepared in accordance with GAAP, 

must be limited to 3 percent of your net 

worth at all times for the duration of the 

accounts, as measured at least every 

quarterly call report cycle. This means 

that regardless of how many CDAs you 

invest in, the combined book value of 

all such investments must not exceed 3 

percent of your net worth. You must 

bring your aggregate accounts into 

compliance with the maximum 

aggregate funding limit within 30 days 

of any breach of this limit. 

(ii) Segregated account. The assets of 

a CDA must be held in a segregated 

custodial account or special purpose 

entity and must be specifically 

identified as a CDA; 

(iii) Regulatory oversight. If you 

choose to establish a CDA using a trust 

vehicle, the trustee must be regulated by 

the Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency, the U.S. Securities and 

Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’) or 

another federal regulatory agency. A 

regulated trustee or other person or 

entity that is authorized to make 

investment decisions for a CDA 

(‘‘manager’’), other than the credit union 

itself, must be a Registered Investment 

Advisor. 

(iv) Account documentation and other 

written requirements. The parties to the 

CDA, typically the funding credit union 

and trustee or other manager of the 

account, must document the terms and 

conditions controlling the account in a 

written trust agreement or other similar 

instrument. The terms of the agreement 

must be consistent with this section. 

Your board of directors must adopt 

written policies addressing this funding 

activity that are consistent with this 

section, must review the policies 

annually, and may amend them from 

time to time. 

(A) Your CDA agreement and policies 

must at a minimum: 

(1) Provide that the CDA will make 

charitable contributions and donations 

only to charities you name therein that 

are exempt from taxation under section 

501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code; 

(2) Document the investment 

strategies and risk tolerances the CDA 

trustee or other manager must follow in 

administering the account; 

(3) Provide that you will account for 

all aspects of the CDA, including 

distributions to charities and liquidation 

of the account, in accordance with 

generally accepted accounting 

principles; and (4) indicate the 

frequency with which the trustee or 

manager of the CDA will make 

distributions to qualified charities as 

provided in paragraph (b)(2)(v) of this 

section; 

(B) [Reserved] 

(v) Minimum distribution to charities. 

You are required to distribute to one or 

more qualified charities, no less 

frequently than every 5 years, or upon 

termination of a CDA in less than 5 

years, a minimum of 51 percent of the 

account’s total return on assets over the 

period of up to 5 years. You may choose 

how frequently distributions will be 

made during each period of up to 5 

years. For example, you may choose to 

make periodic distributions over a 

period of up to 5 years, or a single 

distribution at the end of that period. 

You may choose to donate in excess of 

the minimum distribution frequency 

and amount; 

(vi) Liquidation of assets upon CDA 

termination. Upon termination of the 

CDA, you may receive a distribution of 

the remaining account assets in cash or 

you may receive a distribution in kind 

of the remaining account assets but only 

if those assets are permissible 

investments for federal credit unions 

under the Federal Credit Union Act and 

part 703 of this chapter; and 

(vii) Definitions. For purposes of this 

section, the following definitions apply: 

(A) Distribution in kind is your 

acceptance of remaining CDA assets, 

upon termination of the account, in 

their original form instead of in cash 

resulting from the liquidation of the 

assets. 

(B) Qualified charity is a charitable 

organization or other non-profit entity 

recognized as exempt from taxation 

under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal 

Revenue Code. 

(C) Registered Investment Advisor is 

an investment advisor registered with 

the SEC pursuant to the Investment 

Advisers Act of 1940. 

(D) Total return is the actual rate of 

return on all investments in a CDA over 

a given period of up to 5 years, 

including realized interest, capital 

gains, dividends, and distributions. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–22734 Filed 9–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7535–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0789; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–127–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede 

airworthiness directive (AD) 2012–12– 

08, which applies to certain The Boeing 

Company Model 777–200 and –300 

series airplanes. AD 2012–12–08 

requires an inspection for the part 

number of the fuse pin, and replacement 

of the pin if necessary. Since we issued 

AD 2012–12–08, we have determined 

that additional airplanes may be subject 

to the identified unsafe condition. This 

proposed AD would retain the actions 

required by AD 2012–12–08 and add 

airplanes to the applicability. We are 

proposing this AD to prevent structural 

damage to the side and drag brace lock 

assemblies, which could result in 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 57543 

landing gear collapse during 

touchdown, rollout, or taxi. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by November 4, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 

11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail 

address above between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may 

review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue 

SW., Renton, Washington. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is in the 

ADDRESSES section. Comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melanie Violette, Aerospace Engineer, 

Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6422; fax: 

425–917–6590; email: 

melanie.violette@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2013–0789; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–127–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD because of those 

comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

On June 7, 2012, we issued AD 2012– 

12–08, Amendment 39–17088 (77 FR 

37781, June 25, 2012) (‘‘AD 2012–12– 

08’’), for certain The Boeing Company 

Model 777–200 and –300 series 

airplanes. (A correction of AD 2012–12– 

08 was published in the Federal 

Register on July 20, 2012 (77 FR 

42625)). AD 2012–12–08 requires an 

inspection for the part number of the 

fuse pin, and replacement of the pin if 

necessary. AD 2012–12–08 resulted 

from reports of cracked retract actuator 

fuse pins that could fail earlier than the 

previously determined safe life limit of 

the pins. A fractured retract actuator 

fuse pin can cause the main landing 

gear (MLG) to extend without restriction 

and attempt to lock into position under 

high dynamic loads. We issued AD 

2012–12–08 to prevent structural 

damage to the side and drag brace lock 

assemblies, which could result in 

landing gear collapse during 

touchdown, rollout, or taxi. 

Actions Since AD 2012–12–08 Was 

Issued 

Since we issued AD 2012–12–08, it 

was discovered that an 

interchangeability error in the Boeing 

777 Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC) 

permitted replacing the new pin (–3) 

with the old pin (–1). Therefore, we 

have determined that additional 

airplanes may be subject to the 

identified unsafe condition. 

Relevant Service Information 

We reviewed Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 777–32– 

0083, Revision 2, dated May 2, 2013. 

For information on the procedures and 

compliance times, see this service 

information at http:// 

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0789. 

FAA’s Determination 

We are proposing this AD because we 

evaluated all the relevant information 

and determined the unsafe condition 

described previously is likely to exist or 

develop in other products of these same 

type designs. 

Proposed AD Requirements 

Although this proposed AD does not 

explicitly restate the requirements of AD 

2012–12–08, this proposed AD would 

retain all requirements of AD 2012–12– 

08. Those requirements are referenced 

in the service information identified 

previously, which, in turn, is referenced 

in paragraph (g) of this proposed AD. 

This proposed AD would add airplanes 

to the applicability statement of AD 

2012–12–08. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 129 airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection ................................ 5 work-hours × $85 per hour = $425 ..................................... $0 $425 $54,825 

We estimate the following costs to do 

any necessary replacements that would 

be required based on the results of the 

proposed inspection. We have no way of 

determining the number of aircraft that 

might need these replacements: 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
57544 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

ON-CONDITION COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product 

Pin Replacement ................................................. 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = 

$85 per pin.

$700 per pin .......................... $785 per pin. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this 

proposed AD would not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This proposed AD would not 

have a substantial direct effect on the 

States, on the relationship between the 

national Government and the States, or 

on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that the proposed regulation: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

the DOT Regulatory Policies and 

Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 

1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing airworthiness directive (AD) 

2012–12–08, Amendment 39–17088 (77 

FR 37781, June 25, 2012; corrected July 

20, 2012 (77 FR 42625)), and adding the 

following new AD: 

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA– 

2013–0789; Directorate Identifier 2013– 

NM–127–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

The FAA must receive comments on this 

AD action by November 4, 2013. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD supersedes AD 2012–12–08, 

Amendment 39–17088 (77 FR 37781, June 

25, 2012; corrected July 20, 2012 (77 FR 

42625)). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 777–200 and –300 series airplanes, 

certificated in any category, as identified in 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

777–32–0083, Revision 2, dated May 2, 2013. 

(d) Subject 

Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/

Air Transport Association (ATA) of America 

Code 32, Landing Gear. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a determination 

that additional airplanes may be subject to 

the identified unsafe condition. We are 

issuing this AD to prevent structural damage 

to the side and drag brace lock assemblies, 

which could result in landing gear collapse 

during touchdown, rollout, or taxi. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Part Number Inspection and Replacement 

Except as required by paragraph (h) of this 

AD, at the applicable time specified in 

paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing 

Special Attention Service Bulletin 777–32– 

0083, Revision 2, dated May 2, 2013: Inspect 

the retract actuator fuse pin to determine the 

part number, and replace any retract actuator 

fuse pin having part number 112W1769–1, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 777–32–0083, Revision 2, 

dated May 2, 2013. A review of airplane 

maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of 

this inspection if the part number of the 

retract actuator fuse pin can be conclusively 

determined from that review. Do all 

applicable replacements at the applicable 

time specified in paragraph 1.E., 

‘‘Compliance,’’ of Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 777–32–0083, Revision 2, 

dated May 2, 2013. 

(h) Exception to Service Information 

Specifications 

Where Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 777–32–0083, Revision 2, dated May 

2, 2013, specifies a compliance time ‘‘after 

the Revision 2 date of this service bulletin,’’ 

this AD requires compliance within the 

specified compliance time after the effective 

date of this AD. 

(i) Parts Installation Prohibition 

(1) For airplanes identified in Group 1 of 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

777–32–0083, Revision 2, dated May 2, 2013: 

As of July 30, 2012 (the effective date of AD 

2012–12–08, Amendment 39–17088 (77 FR 

37781, June 25, 2012; corrected July 20, 2012 

(77 FR 42625)), no person may install a 

retract actuator fuse pin having part number 

112W1769–1 on any airplane. 

(2) For airplanes identified in Group 2 of 

Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 

777–32–0083, Revision 2, dated May 2, 2013: 

As of the effective date of this AD, no person 

may install a retract actuator fuse pin having 

part number 112W1769–1 on any airplane. 

(j) Credit for Previous Actions 

(1) This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of AD 2012–12–08, 

Amendment 39–17088 (77 FR 37781, June 

25, 2012; corrected July 20, 2012 (77 FR 

42625)) using Boeing Special Attention 

Service Bulletin 777–32–0083, dated 

February 5, 2009, which is not incorporated 

by reference in this AD. 

(2) This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using Boeing Special 

Attention Service Bulletin 777–32–0083, 

Revision 1, dated February 17, 2011, which 

is not incorporated by reference in this AD. 

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 182 / Thursday, September 19, 2013 / Proposed Rules 57545 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in the 

Related Information section of this AD. 

Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO–AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(l) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Melanie Violette, Aerospace 

Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, 

FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057– 

3356; phone: 425–917–6422; fax: 425–917– 

6590; email: melanie.violette@faa.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You 

may review copies of the referenced service 

information at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, 

Washington. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 13, 2013. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–22784 Filed 9–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2013–0749; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–ASW–16] 

Proposed Amendment of Class D 

Airspace; Dallas, Addison Airport, TX 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM), withdrawal. 

SUMMARY: A NPRM published in the 

Federal Register of September 6, 2013, 

to amend the Class D airspace ceiling at 

Addison Airport, Dallas, TX, is being 

withdrawn. Upon review, the FAA 

determined that the proposed 

rulemaking action is premature in that 

an existing Dallas/Fort Worth Class B 

airspace rulemaking action is pending. 

DATES: As of September 19, 2013, the 

proposed rule published September 6, 

2013, at 78 FR 54795, is withdrawn. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Scott Enander, Central Service Center, 

Operations Support Group, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort 

Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817–321– 

7716. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On September 6, 2013, a NPRM was 

published in the Federal Register 

proposing to amend the Addison 

Airport Class D airspace ceiling (78 FR 

54795). Subsequent to that publication, 

the FAA found that references 

addressing changes or adjustments to air 

traffic flows in the Dallas-Fort Worth 

metropolitan area are in error and that 

the proposed action is premature in that 

a Dallas/Fort Worth Class B airspace 

rulemaking action is pending. Upon 

completion of the Dallas/Fort Worth 

Class B airspace rulemaking action, the 

FAA will reconsider future action to 

modify Addison Airport Class D 

airspace, if warranted. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (air). 

The Withdrawal 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, the Notice of 

Proposed Rulemaking, as published in 

the Federal Register on September 6, 

2013 (78 FR 54795) (FR Doc. 2013– 

21751), is hereby withdrawn. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 

40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959– 

1963 Comp., p. 389. 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on September 11, 

2013. 

David P. Medina, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO 

Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2013–22852 Filed 9–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4901–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0659; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AWP–12 

Proposed Establishment of Class D 

Airspace and Class E Airspace; 

Laguna AAF, AZ 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: This action proposes to 

establish Class D airspace and Class E 

airspace at Laguna Army Air Field 

(AAF), (Yuma Proving Ground), Yuma, 

AZ. The establishment of an air traffic 

control tower has made this action 

necessary for the safety and 

management of Instrument Flight Rules 

(IFR) aircraft within this airspace. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before November 4, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this 

proposal to the U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 

366–9826. You must identify FAA 

Docket No. FAA–2013–0659; Airspace 

Docket No. 13–AWP–12, at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments through the 

Internet at 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4537. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

Interested parties are invited to 

participate in this proposed rulemaking 

by submitting such written data, views, 

or arguments, as they may desire. 

Comments that provide the factual basis 

supporting the views and suggestions 

presented are particularly helpful in 

developing reasoned regulatory 

decisions on the proposal. Comments 

are specifically invited on the overall 

regulatory, aeronautical, economic, 

environmental, and energy-related 

aspects of the proposal. 

Communications should identify both 

docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA 

2013–0659 and Airspace Docket No. 13– 

AWP–12) and be submitted in triplicate 

to the Docket Management System (see 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS