alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 3,291

 3,501

 3,191

 3,762

 4,229

 4,433

 9,385

 5,794

 4,416

 3,655

 3,735

 3,938

 3,879

 4,305

 3,712

 3,694

 3,647

 3,712

 3,542

 3,706

 3,078

 2,500

 2,908

 3,844

 3,639

 3,255

 3,198

 3,049

 3,052

 3,619

 65,175

 65,043

 65,116

 64,892

 65,221

 65,978

 66,890

 72,461

 74,343

 74,821

 74,552

 74,373

 74,395

 74,360

 74,732

 74,522

 74,305

 74,055

 73,878

 73,549

 73,392

 72,647

 71,390

 70,583

 70,705

 70,627

 70,188

 69,717

 69,127

 68,570

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: December 19, 2002

 68,466

 68,544

 68,307

 68,654

 69,450

 70,411

 76,275

 78,255

 78,759

 78,476

 78,287

 78,311

 78,274

 78,665

 78,444

 78,216

 77,952

 77,767

 77,420

 77,255

 76,470

 75,147

 74,298

 74,427

 74,344

 73,882

 73,386

 72,766

 72,179

 72,189

 3,870,000

 3,849,000

 3,827,000

 3,806,000

 3,785,000

 3,763,000

 3,742,000

 3,721,000

 3,700,000

 3,678,000

 3,657,000

 3,636,000

 3,614,000

 3,593,000

 3,572,000

 3,550,000

 3,529,000

 3,508,000

 3,486,000

 3,465,000

 3,444,000

 3,422,000

 3,401,000

 3,380,000

 3,359,000

 3,337,000

 3,316,000

 3,295,000

 3,273,000

 3,252,000

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 68,605
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

         Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the nine months ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  May 15, 2009





By: /s/ Duane J. Roth
    ----------------------------------
        Duane J. Roth
        Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ROBERT G. HOULE,

 

 Appellant,

v.

CASCO INVESTMENTS, INC. AND 

JOSE LUIS CASILLAS: JLC 

VENTURES,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00189-CV

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2011-2614)

O R D E R

The court has this day filed the Supplemental Clerk’s Record containing the Trial Court’s 

Order Denying Challenge to Statement of Inability to Pay Costs pursuant to this Court’s order 

dated September 15, 2017. Therefore, Appellant will be allowed to proceed without paying for 

the costs of appeal, including the fee for the reporter’s record.

Further, the appellate timetable suspension is lifted and the Reporter’s Record shall be filed 

with this Court on or before November 12, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 13

th day of October, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### Phillip IGBINADOLOR, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant, v. SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., Sony Corporation of America, and Tivo, Inc., Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees, and Clarion Corporation of America, Defendant-Appellee, and JVC Americas Corp., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee, and Philips Consumer Electronics Company and Philips Magnavox, Defendants.

No. 05-1554.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Feb. 10, 2006.

Before RADER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

*944
      *ORDER*

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Phillip Igbinadolor responds to the court’s order directing him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as premature.

Igbinadolor brought suit against Sony Electronics, Inc. and Sony Corporation of America (Sony), TiVo, Inc., Clarion Corporation of America, and JVC Americas Corp. for patent and trademark infringement. Sony, TiVo, and JVC filed counterclaims. The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted Sony, TiVo, Clarion, and JVC’s motions for summary judgment of noninfringement, and Igbinadolor appealed. Because it appeared that the district court had not yet entered final judgment and invalidity counterclaims were pending before the district court, we directed Igbinadolor to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as premature.

In response, Igbinadolor argues that the court should not dismiss because the district court’s order granting summary judgment did not “mention any schedule of hearings contemplated by the Court” and that “[i]t can reasonably be concluded that the decision was accepted as final by all parties.”

“A ‘final decision’ generally is one which ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.” *Catlin v. United States,*324 U.S. 229, 65 S.Ct. 631, 633, 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945). Because counterclaims remain pending, the district court’s decision is not final and Igbinadolor’s appeal is premature. *See Pause Technology, LLC v. TiVo Inc.,*401 F.3d 1290, 1294 (Fed.Cir.2005) (stating that “a pending counterclaim precludes jurisdiction absent certification under Rule 54(b)”).

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Dennis Szudy, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 58433;

First District (4th Division) —

July 25, 1973.

John J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, (Lee T. Hettinger, Assistant Public Defender, of counsel,) for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State’s Attorney, of Chicago, (Kenneth L. Gillis and Patrick Delphino, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel,) for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE BURMAN.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



                                  CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth McCullum, certify that:


1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of the periods included in the year covered by this annual report of
         Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-059;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the depositor by the trustee under the
         pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, for inclusion in these
         reports is included in these reports;

4.       I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
         depositor and the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreement, and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review
         required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports,
         the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under
         that agreement; and

5.       The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         trustee's or depositor's compliance with the minimum servicing or
         similar standards based upon the report provided by an independent
         public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the
         Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
         procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar
         agreements, that is included in these reports.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

                  JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents



Date: August 9, 2005

/s/ Kenneth McCullum

Kenneth McCullum
Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Exhibit 3.3



              Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Formation

                                       of

                             CHESAPEAKE FUNDING LLC

          It is hereby certified that:

          1. The name of the limited liability company  (hereinafter  called the
"limited liability company") is:

                             CHESAPEAKE FUNDING LLC

          2. The  certificate of formation of the limited  liability  company is
hereby amended by striking out the statement  relating to the limited  liability
company's  registered  agent and registered  office and by  substituting in lieu
thereof the following new statement:

                    "The address of the registered office and the name
                    and the  address  of the  registered  agent of the
                    limited   liability   company   required   to   be
                    maintained  by  Section  18-104  of  the  Delaware
                    Limited  Liability  Company  Act  are  Corporation
                    Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400,
                    Wilmington, Delaware 19808."



Executed on June 24, 2002




                                                /s/ LYNN FELDMAN
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Lynn Feldman
                                                Authorized Person
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration; 
Johnson Matthey Inc.

    By Notice dated November 21, 2011, and published in the Federal 
Register on November 29, 2011, 76 FR 73679, Johnson Matthey Inc., 
Pharmaceuticals Materials, 900 River Road, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 
19428, made application by letter to the Drug Enforcement 
Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the 
following basic classes of controlled substances:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    Drug                               Schedule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diphenoxylate (9170).......................  II
Meperidine (9230)..........................  II
Methadone (9250)...........................  II
Methadone Intermediate (9254)..............  II
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances 
in bulk for distribution and sale to its customers.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Johnson Matthey Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of 
controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Johnson Matthey Inc. to ensure that the 
company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance 
with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as 
a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances 
listed.

     Dated: April 17, 2012.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-10050 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.00 Authority of the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) Administrator under subparts A, B, and C.

Pursuant to the regulations under this part, temporary labor certification determinations under subparts A, B, and C of this part are ordinarily made by the Office of Foreign Labor Certification (OFLC) Administrator (OFLC Administrator) of the Employment and Training Administration. The OFLC Administrator will informally advise the employer or agent of the name of the official who will make determinations with respect to the application.

[71 FR 35518, June 21, 2006]

###### Editorial Note on Subpart L of Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart L of part 655 appear at 75 FR 10403, Mar. 5, 2010.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart M of Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart M of part 655 appear at 75 FR 10403, Mar. 5, 2010.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 2,396

 2,793

 3,178

 3,931

 2,812

 4,338

 4,158

 4,125

 5,507

 2,686

 1,901

 743

 369

 195

 406

 820

 1,710

 2,018

 2,946

 2,506

 705

 283

 122

 118

 113

 113

 112

 117

 110

 110

 226

 240

 256

 229

 247

 335

 315

 247

 238

 271

 218

 190

 144

 155

 124

 119

 115

 110

 131

 117

 111

 104

 102

 94

 95

 95

 97

 95

 99

 98

 100

 98

 1,409

 1,428

 1,397

 1,404

 1,397

 1,642

 1,541

 1,595

 1,822

 965

 914

 258

 233

 145

 180

 263

 365

 463

 548

 471

 173

 122

 106

 104

 103

 104

 103

 105

 103

 105

 113

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2005 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 22, 2005

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY
### §3778. Board of local inspectors

(a) The President shall provide for the establishment of a Board of Local Inspectors of the Panama Canal Commission which shall perform, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the President—

(1) the investigations required by section 3777 of this title; and

(2) such other duties with respect to marine matters as may be assigned by the President.

(b) In conducting any investigation pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Board of Local Inspectors established pursuant to such subsection may summon witnesses, administer oaths, and require the production of books and papers necessary for such investigation.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1418, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 487.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Functions vested in President by this section delegated to Secretary of Defense, see section 1–303 of Ex. Ord. No. 12215, May 27, 1980, 45 F.R. 36044, set out as a note under section 3601 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,021.65

 1,021.99

 1,022.63

 1,022.94

 1,023.19

 1,023.44

 1,023.53

 1,023.67

 1,023.94

 1,023.99

 1,024.40

 1,024.66

 1,025.00

 1,025.09

 1,025.29

 1,025.34

 1,025.34

 1,025.34

 1,025.36

 1,025.43

 1,025.55

 1,025.61

 1,025.80

 1,026.00

 1,026.19

 1,026.49

 1,026.79

 1,026.97

 1,027.17

 1,027.39

 1,027.62

 3,326.8

 3,335.0

 3,350.6

 3,358.1

 3,364.2

 3,370.4

 3,372.6

 3,376.0

 3,382.6

 3,383.8

 3,393.9

 3,400.3

 3,408.7

 3,410.9

 3,415.8

 3,417.1

 3,417.1

 3,417.1

 3,417.6

 3,419.3

 3,422.2

 3,423.7

 3,428.4

 3,433.4

 3,438.1

 3,445.5

 3,453.0

 3,457.5

 3,462.5

 3,467.9

 3,473.7

STORAGE

+8.7

+8.2

+15.6

+7.5

+6.1

+6.1

+2.2

+3.4

+6.6

+1.2

+10.1

+6.4

+8.4

+2.2

+4.9

+1.2

+0.0

+0.0

+0.5

+1.7

+3.0

+1.5

+4.7

+4.9

+4.7

+7.5

+7.5

+4.5

+5.0

+5.5

+5.7

CHANGE

 6,360

 6,701

 9,881

 6,379

 5,849

 5,711

 4,739

 4,846

 6,517

 6,332

 9,233

 6,514

 7,689

 5,115

 5,990

 5,134

 4,476

 4,679

 4,459

 4,351

 4,476

 5,717

 6,323

 6,820

 5,984

 7,411

 7,618

 6,818

 6,411

 6,311

 7,063

INFLOW

 1,942

 2,470

 2,013

 2,568

 2,762

 2,606

 3,614

 3,090

 3,129

 5,621

 4,070

 3,254

 3,422

 3,929

 3,424

 4,416

 4,367

 4,570

 4,122

 3,428

 2,901

 4,867

 3,933

 4,321

 3,495

 3,544

 3,707

 4,461

 3,830

 3,461

 4,059

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 21

 79

 14

 7

 7

 22

 14

 29

 58

 94

 80

 36

 51

 65

 73

 95

 109

 109

 87

 51

 80

 102

 22

 7

 110

 110

 154

 103

 66

 81

 110

C.F.S.

 .03

 .11

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .03

 .02

 .04

 .08

 .13

 .11

 .05

 .07

 .09

 .10

 .13

 .15

 .15

 .12

 .07

 .11

 .14

 .03

 .01

 .15

 .15

 .21

 .14

 .09

 .11

 .15

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .05

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .81

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2013 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 8, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +155.5 191,907 111,396 0 0 2,046 2.81 .88

ACRE-FEET +155,500 380,648 220,954 0 0 4,058

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 220,954

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 220,954

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .88

JULY 1, 2012 37.78

 3,318.1

Table 3
Exhibit 23.2




                   [LETTERHEAD OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP]


                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Form S-3 of Newmont Mining
Corporation filed on April 26, 2002, of our report dated April 30, 2001, related
to Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation Limited's financial statements for the year
ended March 31, 2001. We also consent to the references to us under the headings
"Experts" in this Form S-3.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Toronto, Canada
April 26, 2002
§ 220.141 Substantial gainful activity, defined. Substantial gainful activity is work activity that is both substantial and gainful. ( a ) *Substantial work activity.* Substantial work activity is work activity that involves doing significant physical or mental activities. The claimant's work may be substantial even if it is done on a part-time basis or if the claimant does less, gets paid less, or has less responsibility than when the claimant worked before.
( b ) *Gainful work activity.* Gainful work activity is work activity that the claimant does for pay or profit. Work activity is gainful if it is the kind of work usually done for pay or profit, whether or not a profit is realized.
( c ) *Some other activities.* Generally, the Board does not consider activities like taking care of one's self, household tasks, hobbies, therapy, school attendance, club activities, or social programs to be substantial gainful activity.
§ 30.422 If an employee is only partially reimbursed for a medical expense, must the provider refund the balance of the amount paid to the employee? ( a ) The OWCP fee schedule sets maximum limits on the amounts payable for many services. The employee may be only partially reimbursed for out-of-pocket medical expenses because the amount he or she paid to the medical provider for a service exceeds the maximum allowable charge set by the OWCP fee schedule.
( b ) If this happens, the employee will be advised of the maximum allowable charge for the service in question and of his or her responsibility to ask the provider to refund to the employee, or credit to the employee's account, the amount he or she paid that exceeds the maximum allowable charge. The provider that the employee paid, but not the employee, may request reconsideration of the fee determination as set forth in § 30.712.
( c ) If the provider does not refund to the employee or credit to his or her account the amount of money paid in excess of the charge that OWCP allows, the employee should submit documentation of the attempt to obtain such refund or credit to OWCP. OWCP may authorize reasonable reimbursement to the employee after reviewing the facts and circumstances of the case.
128 STAT. 2090 PUBLIC LAW 113–217—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3682: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

June 17, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–217 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the community based outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs located at 1961 Premier Drive in Mankato, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Lyle C. 

Pearson Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LYLE C. PEARSON COMMUNITY BASED OUTPATIENT 

CLINIC. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The community based outpatient clinic of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs located at 1961 Premier Drive 

in Mankato, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as the 

‘‘Lyle C. Pearson Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the clinic 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lyle C. Pearson Community Based Outpatient Clinic’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 3682] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
§ 418.3665 Can your request for a hearing or case review be dismissed? We will dismiss your request for a hearing or case review under any of the following conditions: ( a ) At any time before notice of the decision is mailed, you ask that your request for administrative review be withdrawn; or
( b ) You failed to request administrative review timely and did not have good cause for missing the deadline for requesting review.