alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.3


 


INSTRUMENT
OF TRANSFER


 


 



 


PUYI
INC.


(Incorporated
in the Cayman Islands with limited liability)


 





 



 


	I/We,	Worldwide Success Group Limited




	of	OMC Chambers, Wickhams Cay 1, Road Town, Tortola, British
Virgin Islands




	in consideration of the sum of	Nil




	paid to me/us by (name)	Winter Dazzle Limited








	(occupation)	 




	of (address)	Vistra Corporate
    Services Centre Wickhams Cay II, Road Town Tortola, VG1110, British Virgin Islands







	(hereinafter “the said
    Transferee”) do hereby transfer to the
    said Transferee the	- 14,400,000 -




	share(s) numbered	




standing
in my/our name in the register of: -


 


PUYI
INC.


 


to hold unto the said Transferee
his Executors, Administrators or Assigns, subject to the several conditions upon which I/we hold the same at
the time of execution hereof. And I/we, the said Transferee do hereby agree to take the said share(s) subject
to the same conditions.


 


	Witness
    our hands the 31st day of August 2018.	


  


For
and on behalf of


WORLDWIDE
SUCCESS GROUP LIMITED


 


	By:	/s/
    Haifeng Yu	 


  





For
and on behalf of


WINTER
DAZZLE LIMITED 


   


	By:	/s/
    Longchang Liao
---

FAX (303) 623-4258621 SEVENTEENTH STREET
SUITE 1550
DENVER, COLORADO 80293
TELEPHONE (303) 623-9147








Exhibit No. 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





As independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the reference of our name in the Report on Form 10-K for the years ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 of PDC 2005B (the "Partnership"). We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in the Partnership, or in any affiliate. We have not been employed on a contingent basis, and we are not connected with the Partnership, or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, employee or affiliate.








/s/ Ryder Scott CompanyRYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP








Denver, Colorado


March 26, 2010








1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218
TEL (713)651-9191
FAX (713)651-08491200, 530-8TH AVENUE, S.W.
CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 3S8
TEL (403) 262-2799
FAX (403) 262-2790
§ 404.340 How do I become entitled to mother's or father's benefits as a surviving divorced spouse? You may be entitled to mother's or father's benefits as the surviving divorced wife or the surviving divorced husband on the earnings record of someone who was fully or currently insured when she or he died. You are entitled to these benefits if— ( a ) You were validly married to the insured under State law as described in § 404.345 or you were deemed to be validly married as described in § 404.346 but the marriage ended in a final divorce and— ( 1 ) You are the mother or father of the insured's child; or
( 2 ) You were married to the insured when either of you adopted the other's child or when both of you adopted a child and the child was then under 18 years old;
( b ) You apply for these benefits; or you were entitled to wife's or husband's benefits for the month before the insured died;
( c ) You are unmarried;
( d ) You are not entitled to widow's or widower's benefits, or to an old-age benefit that is equal to or larger than the full mother's or father's benefit; and
( e ) You have *in your care* the insured's child who is under age 16 or disabled, is your natural or adopted child, and is entitled to child's benefits on the insured person's record. Sections 404.348 and 404.349 describe when a child is *in your care.*
[44 FR 34481, June 15, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 68932, Oct. 17, 1980; 48 FR 21927, May 16, 1983; 58 FR 64891, Dec. 10, 1993; 73 FR 40967, July 17, 2008]
AMENDMENT OF SECURITY AGREEMENT


     This AMENDMENT OF SECURITY AGREEMENT {this "Agreement") is made and
entered into this 29th day of October, 1999, by and between MLFC Corporation, a
California corporation (hereinafter "Secured Party"), and SGI INTERNATIONAL, a
Utah corporation (hereinafter "SGI").

     A. SGI and Secured Party previously entered into a Security Agreement
dated January 14, 1999 (the "Security Agreement"), pursuant to which SGI granted
secured Party a security interest in the Collateral to secure payment and
performance of the Obligations (as such terms are defined in the Security
Agreement).

     B. The parties desire to terminate the Security Agreement as hereinafter
provided.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and of the
mutual premises herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

     1. Termination of Security Agreement The Security Agreement shall
terminate, and neither SGI nor Secured Party shall have any further rights or
obligations thereunder, upon completion of the First Transfer contemplated by
that certain Agreement and Assignment between SGI and LFC Technologies LLC
executed concurrently herewith.

     2. Effect of Amendment. Until the First Transfer has occurred, the
Security Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the day and year first above written.

SGI INTERNATIONAL, a Utah corporation

By  /S/ MICHAEL L. ROSE
Name: Michael L. Rose
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer


MLFC CORPORATION, a California corporation

By:   /S/ MASAHIDE KONISHI
Name: Masahide Konishi
Title: President
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JONATHAN PEAVY
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 2452

[ November 9, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; James W. McCann , Judge; L.T. Case No. 2014

- CF

- 002126

A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke R. Napodano, Assistant Attorney Ge neral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN
, C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 618.335 Initial assessment of trade-affected workers. ( a ) A State must carry out an initial assessment for each trade-affected worker as part of the intake process described in section 239(g) of the Act. When applicable, a State must use the results of an assessment developed by a partner program, supplemented if necessary, as described in § 618.330(e).
( b ) The results of the initial assessment will determine the best service strategy to assist the trade-affected worker in obtaining reemployment and provide insight into which benefits and services under the TAA Program and partner programs would be most beneficial to the worker. The initial assessment of the availability of suitable employment to the worker in the local labor market must take into consideration the following factors: ( 1 ) Prevailing local labor market conditions, including the unemployment rate, local employer skill demands and hiring prerequisites;
( 2 ) The worker's knowledge, skills, and abilities from his or her education and previous employment;
( 3 ) Transferable skills that the worker may possess that would be of interest to other local employers;
( 4 ) Evaluation of a worker's skill levels (including literacy, numeracy, and English language proficiency), aptitudes, abilities (including skills gaps), and supportive service needs; and
( 5 ) Any barriers to the worker's reemployment, such as: ( i ) Lack of applicability of skills from the worker's present occupation to other occupations;
( ii ) Skills that are in excess supply in the labor market area; or
( iii ) Other barriers as outlined in WIOA section 3(24).
( c ) Based upon the information gathered in the initial assessment, described in paragraph (a) of this section, the State may: ( 1 ) Determine that suitable employment is available to the trade-affected worker, and if so, the State must make available employment and case management services. If the worker disagrees with the determination, the State must make available to the worker a comprehensive and specialized assessment (under § 618.345) to obtain additional information to determine whether the initial assessment was correct.
( 2 ) Determine that no suitable employment is available to the worker and, if so, the State must make available services as described in § 618.310 (responsibilities for the delivery of employment and case management services) and a comprehensive and specialized assessment (as described in § 618.345) to develop a comprehensive service strategy for the trade-affected worker.
( d ) If the State determines under paragraph (c) of this section that suitable employment is not available to a trade-affected worker, even with additional employment and case management services, the State must advise the worker to apply for training under subpart F of this part.
## F - 20 Figure 28: 111624 Exhaust Temperatures Profile Application: Teichert Powerscreen Diesel Generator 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 

### Temperature o 

### CPercent Operation Duetz Model BF4M1012C 97 BHP 

### Figure 29: Cecert 14 Exhaust Temperature Profile Application: F.S.T. Sand and Gravel Screening Plant

Generator 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 

### Temperature Degree CPercent Operation Deutz Model BF4M1012C

## F - 21 Figure 30: 20004321 Exhaust Temperature Profile Application: Aggregate Recycler Generator 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 150 250 350 450 550 

### Temperature Degree CPercent Operation 1999 Caterpillar Model 3406 440 BHP 

### Figure 31: 20022977 Exhaust Temperature Profile Application: Radial Stacker Generator 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 

### Temperature Degree CPercent Operation 1999 Cummins Model 4B3.9 80 BHP

## F - 22 Figure 32: Cecert 43 Exhaust Temperature Profile Application: Rock Crusher Generator 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 150 250 350 450 550 650



### Temperature Degree CPercent Operation Caterpillar Model 3412 

### Figure 33: Powerscreen 1800 Exhaust Temperature Profile

Application: Screener Generator 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 Temperature Degree CPercent Operation 2001 Duetz Model BF4M-1012C 97 BHP

## F - 23 

## Figure 34: 108739 Engine Exhaust Temperature Application: Drilling Rig Generator

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 

## Temperature (C)Percent Operation 

### 2001 Caterpillar Model 3508 1480 BHP, Turbo, AC/AC 

## Figure 35: 7810876 Engine Exhaust Temperature Profile

Application: Generator Genrig 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 100 150 200 250 300 350 400



## Temperature (C)Percent Operation 2001 Caterpillar Model 3508 1480 BHP, Turbo, AC/AC
1

Vagenas, Ginger

From: Clover, Fletcher

Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 3:05 PM

To: Vagenas, Ginger

Subject: RE: 2013 Arizona Data Certification Letter

I checked, and there have been no changes to ozone data since ADEQ submitted their 2013 data certification 

package. Below is a screen shot showing data completeness levels near 100%: 

Hope that helps, 

Fletcher 

________________________________________ 

Fletcher Page Clover 

Air Quality Analysis Office 

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

Phone: 415.972.3991 

Email: clover.fletcher@epa.gov

mailing address: 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Air Quality Analysis Office (AIR-7) 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/maps

From: Vagenas, Ginger 

Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 2:25 PM 
2

To: Clover, Fletcher 

Subject: 2013 Arizona Data Certification Letter 

Hi Fletcher– 

I just wanted to confirm my understanding that the preliminary ozone data for 2013 that was submitted to AQS was not 

revised as a result of certification. It looks like there were a few things here and there, but nothing about ozone 

monitors. 

Thanks! 

Ginger L. Vagenas 

U.S. EPA, Region 9 | Air Planning Office (AIR-2) 

75 Hawthorne Street | San Francisco, CA 94105 

415.972.3964 | vagenas.ginger@epa.gov
#### John F. Brayer, Appellant, v. Lily B. M. Fenn, as Executrix, etc., Respondent, and Thirty-six Other Actions against the Same Defendant.

Order affirmed, "with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that even if the original papers were defective the supplemental affidavit supplied the defects and insufficiencies and should have been received and considered, as provided by section 768 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended in 1911.*

*

 See Laws of 1911, chap. 763.—[Rep
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4168 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4168

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 to require 
   an annual review by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the 
  annual government-business forum on capital formation that is held 
                         pursuant to such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Capital Formation 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENT-BUSINESS FORUM ON CAPITAL 
              FORMATION.

    Section 503 of the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 
(15 U.S.C. 80c-1) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) The Commission shall--
            ``(1) review the findings and recommendations of the forum; 
        and
            ``(2) each time the forum submits a finding or 
        recommendation to the Commission, promptly issue a public 
        statement--
                    ``(A) assessing the finding or recommendation of 
                the forum; and
                    ``(B) disclosing the action, if any, the Commission 
                intends to take with respect to the finding or 
                recommendation.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 1, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 4168

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend the Small Business Investment Incentive Act of 1980 to require 
   an annual review by the Securities and Exchange Commission of the 
  annual government-business forum on capital formation that is held 
                         pursuant to such Act.
```
PUBLIC LAW 113–233—DEC. 16, 2014 128 STAT. 2127 

Public Law 113–233 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To expand the program of priority review to encourage treatments for tropical 

diseases. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adding Ebola to the FDA Priority 

Review Voucher Program Act’’. 

SEC. 2. PRIORITY REVIEW TO ENCOURAGE TREATMENTS FOR TROPICAL DISEASES. 

Section 524 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 

U.S.C. 360n) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(3)— 

(A) by redesignating subparagraph (Q) as subparagraph (R); 

(B) by inserting after subparagraph (P) the following: 

‘‘(Q) Filoviruses.’’; and 

(C) in subparagraph (R), as so redesignated, by striking 

‘‘regulation by’’ and inserting ‘‘order of’’; and 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (2), by adding ‘‘There is no limit 

on the number of times a priority review voucher may 

be transferred before such voucher is used.’’ after the period 

at the end; and 

21 USC 301 note. 

Adding Ebola to 

the FDA Priority 

Review Voucher 

Program Act. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[S. 2917] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLAWLAW
128 STAT. 2128 PUBLIC LAW 113–233—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2917: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Dec. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(B) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘365 days’’ and 

inserting ‘‘90 days’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLAWLAW
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,022.20

 1,022.29

 1,022.67

 1,023.19

 1,023.76

 1,024.24

 1,024.52

 1,027.11

 1,030.61

 1,035.17

 1,038.57

 1,038.92

 1,038.53

 1,037.80

 1,036.71

 1,035.60

 1,034.20

 1,033.81

 1,033.84

 1,034.93

 1,035.68

 1,036.91

 1,037.03

 1,036.70

 1,035.91

 1,034.92

 1,033.93

 1,033.02

 1,032.19

 1,031.38

 1,030.50

 3,340.1

 3,342.3

 3,351.6

 3,364.2

 3,378.2

 3,390.0

 3,396.9

 3,461.0

 3,548.9

 3,665.9

 3,754.8

 3,764.0

 3,753.7

 3,734.5

 3,705.9

 3,677.0

 3,640.8

 3,630.7

 3,631.5

 3,659.6

 3,679.1

 3,711.2

 3,714.3

 3,705.7

 3,685.1

 3,659.4

 3,633.8

 3,610.4

 3,589.1

 3,568.5

 3,546.1

STORAGE

-1.5

+2.2

+9.3

+12.7

+13.9

+11.8

+6.9

+64.1

+88.0

+116.9

+88.9

+9.2

-10.3

-19.2

-28.6

-28.9

-36.3

-10.1

+0.8

+28.2

+19.5

+32.1

+3.1

-8.6

-20.6

-25.7

-25.6

-23.4

-21.2

-20.7

-22.3

CHANGE

 5,079

 6,622

 9,434

 9,838

 10,939

 10,243

 12,235

 43,844

 54,221

 68,120

 56,861

 37,431

 28,473

 23,682

 19,003

 18,111

 15,190

 23,939

 26,824

 38,801

 35,169

 40,933

 28,529

 20,434

 17,049

 14,933

 13,586

 11,159

 10,853

 10,830

 10,304

INFLOW

 5,765

 5,467

 4,764

 3,401

 3,865

 4,285

 8,401

 11,517

 9,821

 9,158

 12,026

 18,778

 17,022

 18,722

 18,490

 18,236

 18,215

 17,665

 17,799

 18,125

 18,065

 18,584

 18,517

 17,848

 18,354

 17,930

 18,390

 18,457

 18,487

 18,146

 18,566

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 2

 13,979

 16,571

 14,578

 14,847

 14,395

 15,142

 11,291

 8,613

 6,475

 7,280

 6,176

 8,423

 6,916

 9,062

 9,931

 8,061

 4,465

 3,023

 3,013

 2,997

OUTLET

 50

 50

 7

 43

 43

 22

 362

 7

 45

 15

 8

 23

 62

 69

 61

 61

 114

 53

 23

 8

 8

 8

 8

 15

 23

 30

 30

 38

 53

 82

 7

C.F.S.

 .07

 .07

 .01

 .06

 .06

 .03

 .50

 .01

 .06

 .02

 .01

 .03

 .08

 .09

 .08

 .08

 .15

 .07

 .03

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .03

 .04

 .04

 .05

 .07

 .11

 .01

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .05

 1.96

 .03

 .00

 .50

 1.85

 3.37

 .64

 3.13

 .03

 .08

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .32

 3.75

 2.45

 1.33

 2.64

 .13

 .22

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2017 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 6, 2017

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +204.6 732,669 442,866 0 185,240 1,428 1.92 22.50

ACRE-FEET +204,600 1,453,249 878,425 0 367,424 2,832

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 878,425

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 367,424

 1,245,849

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 22.50

JULY 1, 2016 54.34

 3,341.6

Table 3

OCT 1, 2016 TO DATE = 54.34
#### John F. Weinheimer, Appellant, v. Alexander J. Ross and Others, Respondents.

Order made by this court on March 11, 1914, amended so ¡is to provide that the judgment appealed from be modified by striking *934out the award of costs to the defendant (See *ante,*p. 926), and as so modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Held, that the trial court should, as a condition of awarding the equitable relief, have withheld costs from the defendant. All concurred.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                                 CERTIFICATION
I, James P. Wilson, certify that:

1.          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 of JK Acquisition Corp.;

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect,
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.          The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2008


                              /s/ James P. Wilson
                                James P. Wilson
                                ---------------
   Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
                   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# SWair PAH