Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules 15281 

(b) The walking of more than three 

dogs, with a limit of six dogs, at one 

time by any one person for 

consideration (commercial dog walking) 

within the area administered by the 

Presidio Trust, where dog walking is 

otherwise allowed, is hereby authorized 

provided that: 

(1) That person has a valid 

commercial dog walking permit issued 

by Golden Gate National Recreation 

Area (GGNRA); 

(2) The walking of more than three 

dogs, with a limit of six dogs, is done 

pursuant to the conditions of that 

permit; and 

(3) The commercial dog walker badge 

issued to the permittee by the GGNRA 

shall be visibly displayed at all times as 

directed in the permit while the 

permittee is engaging in commercial dog 

walking activities, and shall be provided 

upon request to any person authorized 

to enforce this provision. 

Dated: March 13, 2014. 

Karen A. Cook, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2014–06032 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–4R–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0415; FRL 9908–15- 

Region 5] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Evansville Area; 1997 Annual Fine 

Particulate Matter Maintenance Plan 

Revision to Approved Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Budgets 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

request by Indiana to revise the 1997 

annual fine particulate matter 

maintenance air quality state 

implementation plan (SIP) for the 

Evansville/Southwestern, Indiana Area 

to replace onroad emissions inventories 

and motor vehicle emissions budgets 

(budgets) with inventories and budgets 

developed using EPA’s Motor Vehicle 

Emissions Simulator (MOVES) 

emissions model. Indiana submitted the 

SIP revision request for the Evansville, 

Indiana Area on July 2, 2013. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 18, 2014. Submit your 

comments, identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0415, by one of 

the following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Please see the direct final rule which is 

located in the Rules section of this 

Federal Register for detailed 

instructions on how to submit 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312)353–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the 

Final Rules section of this Federal 

Register, EPA is approving the state’s 

SIP submittal as a direct final rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. A detailed rationale for the 

approval is set forth in the direct final 

rule. If no adverse comments are 

received in response to this rule, no 

further activity is contemplated. If EPA 

receives adverse comments, the direct 

final rule will be withdrawn and all 

public comments received will be 

addressed in a subsequent final rule 

based on this proposed rule. EPA will 

not institute a second comment period. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

on this action should do so at this time. 

Please note that if EPA receives adverse 

comment on an amendment, paragraph, 

or section of this rule and if that 

provision may be severed from the 

remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt 

as final those provisions of the rule that 

are not the subject of an adverse 

comment. For additional information, 

see the direct final rule which is located 

in the Rules section of this Federal 

Register. 

Dated: March 4, 2014. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

[FR Doc. 2014–05904 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0657; FRL–9907–99– 

Region 9] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Arizona; Payson PM10 Air Quality 

Planning Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Clean Air Act 

(CAA), the Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

revision to the Payson portion of the 

Arizona State Implementation Plan 

submitted by the Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality on January 23, 

2012. This revision consists of the 

second ten-year maintenance plan for 

the Payson air quality planning area for 

the national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS) for particulate 

matter less than 10 microns in diameter 

(PM10). EPA is proposing to approve this 

plan based on the conclusion that the 

plan adequately provides for continued 

maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS in the 

Payson area through 2022. EPA is 

proposing this action pursuant to those 

provisions of the CAA that obligate the 

Agency to take action on submittals of 

revisions to SIPs. The effect of this 

action would be to make the State’s 

continuing commitments with respect to 

maintenance of the PM10 NAAQS in the 

Payson area federally enforceable for 

another ten years. 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by April 18, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2013–0657, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
15282 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 942– 

3848, levin.nancy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the Final Update of 

the Limited Maintenance Plan for the 

Payson PM 10 Maintenance Area 

(December 2011) (‘‘Second Ten-Year 

Limited Maintenance Plan’’) submitted 

as a revision to the Arizona State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) on January 

23, 2012 by the Arizona Department of 

Environmental Quality. In the Rules and 

Regulations section of this Federal 

Register, we are approving the Second 

Ten-Year Limited Maintenance Plan for 

the Payson area in a direct final action 

without prior proposal because we 

believe this SIP revision is not 

controversial. If we receive adverse 

comments, however, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal of the direct final 

rule and address the comments in 

subsequent action based on this 

proposed rule. Please note that if we 

receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: March 5, 2014. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2014–05667 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Office of the Secretary 

45 CFR Part 170 

RIN 0991–AB92 

Voluntary 2015 Edition Electronic 

Health Record (EHR) Certification 

Criteria; Interoperability Updates and 

Regulatory Improvements; Correction 

AGENCY: Office of the National 

Coordinator for Health Information 

Technology (ONC), Department of 

Health and Human Services. 

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This notice makes the 

following corrections to the proposed 

rule that appeared in the February 26, 

2014 Federal Register entitled 

‘‘Voluntary 2015 Edition Electronic 

Health Record (EHR) Certification 

Criteria; Interoperability Updates and 

Regulatory Improvements’’: Corrects the 

preamble text and gap certification table 

for four certification criteria that were 

omitted from the list of certification 

criteria eligible for gap certification for 

the 2015 Edition EHR certification 

criteria; and provides information on 

inactive web links that appear in the 

proposed rule. 

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule 

published February 26, 2014, at 79 FR 

10880, continue to be accepted until no 

later than 5 p.m. on April 28, 2014. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steven Posnack, Director, Federal Policy 

Division, Office of Policy and Planning, 

Office of the National Coordinator for 

Health Information Technology, 202– 

690–7151. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In FR Doc. 2014–03959, the proposed 

rule entitled ‘‘Voluntary 2015 Edition 

Electronic Health Record (EHR) 

Certification Criteria; Interoperability 

Updates and Regulatory Improvements’’ 

(79 FR 10880) (hereinafter referred to as 

the 2015 Edition proposed rule), four 

2015 Edition EHR certification criteria 

were omitted from the list of 

certification criteria eligible for gap 

certification. There are also inactive web 

links included in the preamble. These 

errors are identified and corrected in 

this correction notice. 

II. Summary of Errors 

We define ‘‘gap certification’’ at 45 

CFR 170.502 as ‘‘the certification of a 

previously certified Complete EHR or 

EHR Module(s) to: (1) [a]ll applicable 

new and/or revised certification criteria 

adopted by the Secretary at subpart C of 

[part 170] based on the test results of a 

NVLAP-accredited testing laboratory; 

and (2) [a]ll other applicable 

certification criteria adopted by the 

Secretary at subpart C of [part 170] 

based on the test results used to 

previously certify the Complete EHR or 

EHR Module(s)’’ (for further 

explanation, see 76 FR 1307–1308). Our 

gap certification policy focuses on the 

differences between certification criteria 

that are adopted through rulemaking at 

different points in time. This allows 

EHR technology to be certified to only 

the differences between certification 

criteria editions rather than requiring 

EHR technology to be fully retested and 

recertified to certification criteria that 

remain ‘‘unchanged’’ from one edition 

to the next and for which previously 

acquired test results are sufficient. 

Under our gap certification policy, 

‘‘unchanged’’ certification criteria (see 

77 FR 54248 for further explanation) are 

eligible for gap certification, and each 

ONC-Authorized Certification Body 

(ONC–ACB) has discretion over whether 

it will provide the option of gap 

certification. 

In the 2015 Edition proposed rule, we 

noted whether a proposed 2015 Edition 

EHR certification criterion was 

‘‘eligible’’ or ‘‘ineligible’’ for gap 

certification at the beginning of each 

section of the preamble that discussed 

each certification criterion. We also 

provided a table that cross-walked 

‘‘unchanged’’ 2015 Edition EHR 

certification criteria to the 

corresponding 2014 Edition EHR 

certification criteria (79 FR 10916, Table 

4). In the preamble section for each 

certification criterion and in the gap 

certification table (Table 4), we omitted 

four certification criteria that are eligible 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS