Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 83 / Monday, April 30, 2012 / Notices 25503 

collected; and (4) Minimize the burden 

of the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including through 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

Agency: National Endowment for the 

Humanities. 

Title of Proposal: Generic Clearance 

Authority for the National Endowment 

for the Humanities. 

OMB Number: 3136–0134. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion. 

Affected Public: Applicants to NEH 

grant programs, reviewers of NEH grant 

applications, and NEH grantees. 

Total Respondents: 6,978. 

Average Time per Response: varied 

according to type of information 

collection. 

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 68,375 

hours. 

Total Annualized capital/startup 

costs: 0. 

Total annual costs (operating/ 

maintaining systems or purchasing 

services): 0. 

Description: This submission requests 

approval from OMB for a three year 

extension of NEH’s currently approved 

generic clearance authority for all NEH 

information collections other than onetime evaluations, questionnaires and 

surveys. Generic clearance authority 

would include approval of forms and 

instructions for application to NEH 

grant programs, reporting forms for NEH 

grantees, panelists and reviewers and 

for program evaluation purposes. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Susan G. Daisey, Director, Office of 

Grant Management, National 

Endowment for the Humanities, 1100 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 311, 

Washington, DC 20506, or by email to: 

sdaisey@neh.gov. Telephone: 202–606– 

8494. 

Carole Watson, 

Deputy Chairman, National Endowment for 

the Humanities. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10196 Filed 4–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7536–01–P 

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 

Proposal Review Panel for Materials 

Research; Notice of Meeting 

In accordance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92– 

463 as amended), the National Science 

Foundation announces the following 

meeting: 

Name: Site visit review of the Materials 

Research Science and Engineering Center 

(MRSEC) at the University of Nebraska 

Lincoln by the Division of Materials Research 

(DMR) #1203. 

Dates & Times: May 21, 2012; 7:15 a.m.– 

8:30 p.m., May 22, 2012; 7:15 a.m.–3:00 p.m. 

Place: University of Nebraska Lincoln, 

Lincoln, NE. 

Type of Meeting: Part open. 

Contact Person for More Information: Dr. 

Sean L. Jones, Program Director, Materials 

Research Science and Engineering Centers 

Program, Division of Materials Research, 

Room 1065, National Science Foundation, 

4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 

22230, Telephone (703) 292–2986. 

Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and 

recommendations concerning further support 

of the MRSEC at the University of Nebraska. 

Agenda 

Monday, May 21, 2012 

7:15 a.m.–4:30 p.m. Open—Review of the 

MRSEC 

5 p.m.–6:45 p.m. Closed—Executive 

Session 

6:45 p.m.–8:30 p.m. Open—Dinner 

Tuesday, May 22, 2012 

7:15 a.m.–9:50 a.m. Closed—Executive 

Session 

9:50 a.m.–3 p.m. Closed—Executive 

Session, Draft and Review Report 

Reason for Closing: The work being 

reviewed may include information of a 

proprietary or confidential nature, including 

technical information; financial data, such as 

salaries and personal information concerning 

individuals associated with the MRSEC. 

These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 

552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the 

Sunshine Act. 

Dated: April 24, 2012. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10273 Filed 4–27–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket No. NRC–2012–0081] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of pending NRC action to 

submit an information collection 

request to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) and solicitation of public 

comment. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) invites public 

comment about our intention to request 

the OMB’s approval for renewal of an 

existing information collection that is 

summarized below. We are required to 

publish this notice in the Federal 

Register under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. Chapter 35). 

Information pertaining to the 

requirement to be submitted: 

1. The title of the information 

collection: Request for Information 

Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.54(f), 

Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3 

and 9.3, of the Near-Term Task Force 

Review of Insights from the Fukushima 

Dai-ichi Event. 

2. Current OMB approval number: 

3150–0211. 

3. How often the collection is 

required: Once. 

4. Who is required or asked to report: 

104 power reactor licensees, 2 reactors 

in the process of resuming licensing, 

and 2 Combined License applicants 

(with 2 units each). 

5. The number of annual respondents: 

110. 

6. The number of hours needed 

annually to complete the requirement or 

request: 369,960 hours. 

7. Abstract: Following events at the 

Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant 

resulting from the March 11, 2011, 

earthquake and subsequent tsunami, 

and in response to requirements 

contained in Section 402 of the 

Consolidated Appropriations Act (Pub. 

L. 112–074), the NRC sought an 

expedited clearance from OMB to allow 

the collection of information from 

power reactor licensees pursuant to 10 

CFR 50.54(f). OMB approved this 

clearance, which will expire on 

September 30, 2012. The NRC is 

currently preparing to resubmit the 

collection to OMB under normal 

clearance processes. The information 

requested includes seismic and flooding 

hazard reevaluations to determine if 

further regulatory action is necessary, 

walkdowns to confirm compliance with 

the current licensing basis and provide 

input to the hazard reevaluations, and 

analysis of the Emergency Preparedness 

capability with respect to staffing and 

communication ability during a 

prolonged multiunit event. 

Submit, by June 29, 2012, comments 

that address the following questions: 

1. Is the proposed collection of 

information necessary for the NRC to 

properly perform its functions? Does the 

information have practical utility? 

2. Is the burden estimate accurate? 

3. Is there a way to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected? 

4. How can the burden of the 

information collection be minimized, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology? 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES