alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!_~!~J\~.~-::I P 12:0ci

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL

AND SCOT SPENCER

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC.

AND RICHARD BERNARD

Unauthorized Air Transportation,

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules

Enforcement Proceeding

STATUS REPORT

DOT-OST-1995-272

formerly Docket 49233

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and

settlement negotiations.

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST -2004-

17486.
,

2

There have been no further settlement discussions.

In addition, due to the retirement of Mr. Samuel Podberesky, Ms. Blane Workie

will serve as the Acting Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and

Proceedings until further notice.

Date: January 31, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

7f!.l1uane Workie

1f' Acting Assistant General Counsel for

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

Vinh Q. Nguyen

Senior Trial Attorney

United States Department of Transportation

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Room 96-429

Washington, D.C. 20590

TEL: 202-366-9342

FAX: 202-366-7152
3

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272

I hereby certify that on this 31st day ofJanuary, 2014, a true and correct copy of the

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following:

Original

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

By First Class Mail

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder

Chief Administrative Law Judge

Office of Hearings, M-20

U.S. Department of Transportation

Washington, D.C. 20590

TEL: (202) 366-2142

FAX: (202) 366-7536

By First Class Mail

Scot Spencer

SBD Aircraft Services

255 S Leland Norton Way

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408

Scot Spencer

22604 Esplanada Circle

Boca Raton, Florida 33433
EXHIBIT
13.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Rob Sandhu, Director, Chairman, President, Chief Executive and
Operating Officer and Secretary of Giant Oil & Gas Inc. (the “Company”),
certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and  results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
June 29, 2010











By:              /s/ Rob
Sandhu


Name:               Rob
Sandhu


Title:                 Director,
Chairman, President, Chief Executive and Operating Officer and
Secretary


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  
    
    Our report dated March 2, 2011 related to the financial statements as of December 31,
2010 and 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2010 and the period from September 3,
2009 through December 2009, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010, and
    
    Our report dated January 22, 2010 related to the financial statements for the period
from January 1, 2009 through September 2, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports included in this registration statement and to the incorporation by
reference in this registration statement of our report dated January 29, 1999
(except with respect to the matter discussed in Note 17, as to which the date is
March 16, 1999) included in Lear Corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998, and to all references to our firm included in this
registration statement.

                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Detroit, Michigan,

  September 7, 1999.
##### 



1.
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period
ended December 31, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2007
    /s/   ROBERT C.  FARENHEMChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.65



|     |                    |                  
|---- | ------------------ | -----------------
|LOGO |                    | 111 Eighth Avenue
|     | 7th Floor         
|     | New York, NY 10011
|     | 212.624.3700      

As of November 14, 2012

Michael Glick

c/o WebMD Health Corp.

111 Eighth Avenue

New York, NY 10011-5201

Dear Mike:

Reference is made to the grant of a
nonqualified option to purchase 50,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock made to you on November 14, 2012 (the 2012 Option) as evidenced by the Option Agreement dated November 14, 2012 (the Option
Agreement). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Option Agreement, in the event of the termination of your employment by the Company without Cause or by you for Good Reason (as such terms are defined in your Letter
Agreement with the Company dated as of February 11, 2011), in either case within twelve (12) months following a Change of Control of WebMD (as defined in the WebMD Amended and Restated 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan), the 2012 Option, to
the extent unvested, shall remain outstanding and continue to vest as if you remained in the employ of the Company until the first anniversary of such date of termination, subject to a release of claims (as described your Letter Agreement) being
executed by you and becoming effective and your continued compliance with the restrictive covenant agreements you have signed in connection with your employment.

Except as set forth herein, the Option Agreement remains in full force and effect.



|                      
|----------------------
|Sincerely,            
|                      
|/s/ Douglas W. Wamsley
|Douglas W. Wamsley    
|EVP-General Counsel   
|                      
|Agreed to:            
|                      
|/s/ Michael Glick     
|Michael Glick
### §284i. Third replenishment; authorization of appropriations

The United States Governor is hereby authorized to agree on behalf of the United States to contribute to the Association three annual installments of $320,000,000 each as recommended in the "Report of the Executive Directors to the Board of Governors on Additions to IDA Resources: Third Replenishment," dated July 21, 1970. There is hereby authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, the amounts necessary for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury of three annual installments of $320,000,000 each for the United States share of the increase in the resources of the Association.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §11, as added Pub. L. 92–247, §1, Mar. 10, 1972, 86 Stat. 60.)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #13044 and #13045]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION: 

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of West Virginia (FEMA-4059-DR), dated 03/16/2012.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Tornadoes, Flooding, Mudslides, and Landslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         02/29/2012 through 03/05/2012.                    

*Effective Date:*                         04/18/2012.                    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         05/15/2012.                    

*Eidl Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/17/2012.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business                               ( print page 25225)                            Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Presidential disaster declaration for the State of WEST VIRGINIA, dated 03/16/2012 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

Primary Counties: (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans) Harrison, Preston, Taylor.

Contiguous Counties: (Economic Injury Loans Only)

West Virginia: Barbour, Doddridge, Grant, Lewis, Tucker, Upshur.

Maryland: Garrett.

Pennsylvania: Fayette.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

Joseph P. Loddo,

Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2012-10116 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.165 Partial certification. The CO may issue a partial certification, reducing either the period of employment or the number of H-2A workers being requested or both for certification, based upon information the CO receives during the course of processing the *Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* an audit, or otherwise. The number of workers certified will be reduced by one for each U.S. worker who is able, willing, and qualified, and who will be available at the time and place needed and has not been rejected for lawful, job-related reasons, to perform the labor or services. If a partial labor certification is issued, the CO will send the Final Determination notice approving partial certification using the procedures at § 655.162. The Final Determination notice will: ( a ) State the reason(s) the period of employment and/or the number of H-2A workers requested has been reduced, citing the relevant regulatory standards;
( b ) Offer the employer an opportunity to request an expedited administrative review or a de novo administrative hearing before an ALJ of the partial certification under § 655.171; and
( c ) State that if the employer does not request an expedited administrative judicial review or a de novo hearing before an ALJ in accordance with § 655.171, the partial certification is final, and the Department will not accept any appeal on that *Application for Temporary Employment Certification*.
#### H. Gund & Company v. William Horrigan et al.

Filed February 17, 1898.

No. 7848.

Judgments: Entry Nuno Pro Tunc. If a judgment was in fact rendered and such judgment was not recorded, the court at any time afterward, in a proper proceeding, and upon a proper showing, may render such judgment *nuno pro tuno.*Following *Tan Hiten v. Test,*49 Neb. 725.

Error from the district court of Adams county. Tried below before Beall, J.

*Affirmed.*

*B. F. Smith,*for plaintiffs in error.

*T. J. Doyle, contra.*

Ryan, C.

This action was begun in the district court of Adams county to subject to the payment of a judgment certain real property claimed by William and Catherine Horrigan as a homestead. On January 19, 1893, there was a trial, resulting in findings of certain facts, among which were the findings that William and Catherine Horrigan had a homes! ead interest in the real property, subject and second to a mortgage of $1,400 and accrued interest thereon; that a conveyance of William and Catherine Horrigan to their co-defendant, Peter Horrigan, was in fact and law a mortgage, which Avas subject and inferior to tlie claim of plaintiff, H. Gund *&*Co., and not a lien upon the premises. While these findings were folloAAred by an order directing that- judgment be entered upon them, there seems to have been no sucli judgment rendered at that time. On May l(i, 1894, there was filed in this ease a paper, which, though, more pretentious in its designation and scope, may be treated as a motion for an entry of judgment *nunc pro tunc.*Notice of ihe pend-ency of this application Avas' served on the attorneys for Gund & Go., by whom a special appearance Avas filed July *7952, 1894, objecting to the jurisdiction of the court for the reason that no summons had been served on their client, and for the further reason that the court had lost jurisdiction of this case. On July 3, 1894, the record discloses that the cause was submitted to the court upon the evidence, oral, written, and documentary, which had been under consideration originally, and that the court thereon made a finding that the property was of the value of $3,400, and that because of the mortgage thereon of $1,400 there was no balance above the homestead exemption subject to the judgment in favor of H. Gund & Co. There was thereupon entered a decree that the judgment in favor of H. Gund & Co. was not a lien on the premises, and the homestead rights of William and Catherine Horrigan were quieted against said judgment. In *Van Etten*v. *Test,*49 Neb. 725, it has been held that where, in fact, a judgment was rendered but not recorded, the court, at any time afterward, had power, independently of statutory authority, *nunc pro tunc,*to enter a proper judgment against the defendant upon due showing in a proper proceeding. The facts in this case justified the entry of a judgment *mino pro tunc,*and in legal effect there was but the entry of such a judgment'. There has been pointed out no irregularity in the exercise of this power, and we therefore conclude that no such irregularity exists. The judgment of the district court is accordingly

APFIltMED.
U

.S

. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 

## OCT 2 2 2015 In Reply Refer To: ANM-116-16-017 Mr. RickVisser Manager, Office ofAirworthiness Fokker Services B.V. P.O. Box 1357 2130 EL Hoofddorp The Netherlands Dear Mr. Visser: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton , WA 98057-3356

Subject: Method ofCompliance for Airworthiness Directive 2015-21-04 This letterprovides a Method ofCompliance (MOC) to AD 2015-21-04. This MOC is applicable to Fokker Services B.V. Models F27 Mark 200, Mark 300, Mark 400, Mark 500, Mark 600, and Mark 700 airplanes. AD 2015-21-04 was prompted by a design reviewthatrevealed that no controlled bonding provisions are present on a number ofcritical locations, inside the fuel tank or connected to the fuel tank wall, and no anti-spray cover is installed onthe Fuelling Shut-OffValve (FSOV) in both wings. Paragraph (g) ofAD 2015-21-04 requires the installation ofadditional bondingprovisions and an anti-spray cover. The current requirement ofparagraph (g) states: "Atthe next scheduled opening ofthe fuel tanks afterthe effective date ofthis AD, butno later than 84 months after the effective date ofthis AD: Install additional bondingprovisions at the applicable locations, and install an anti-spray cover onthe FSOV in both wings, using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, TransportAirplane Directorate, FAA This letter approves installing the additional bondingprovisions and anti-spray cover inaccordance with Fokker Services B.V. Service Bulletin SBF27-28-071 , Revision 2, dated April20, 2015 as a method ofcompliance (MOC) to paragraph (g) ofAD 2015-21-04. In accordance with FAA Order 8110.103, the following conditions apply to this method of compliance approval: 1. All provisions ofAD 2015-21-04 that are not specifically referenced above remain fully applicable and must be complied with accordingly.ANM-116-16-0 17


### 2. This approval is applicable only to Fokker Services B.V. Models F27 Mark 200, Mark 300, Mark 400, Mark 500, Mark 600, and Mark 700 airplanes. 3. This approval is transferable with airplane(s) to other operators. 2

4. Before using this MOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager ofthe local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. 5. The Transport Airplane Directorate will revoke this MOC ifthe Transport Directorate later determines that this MOC does notprovide an acceptable level ofsafety. This MOC approval only applies to the FAA AD listed above. The FAA does not have the authority to approve this as a MOC to any AD issued by another civil aviation authority (CAA). Approval ofa MOC to another CAA's AD must come from that CAA. Should you have any questions, please contactthis office or Tom Rodriguez at telephone number (425)227-1137, fax (425)227-1149, or electronic mail attom.rodriguez@faa.gov.

reneman Manager, International Branch

cc: Ludovic Aron, EASA PCM EASAADs Rose Opland, ANM-114
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 212

 215

 219

 220

 222

 221

 225

 229

 228

 228

 232

 230

 232

 233

 232

 233

 233

 232

 231

 231

 230

 230

 229

 226

 226

 227

 227

 227

 224

 220

 217

 153

 161

 171

 169

 170

 156

 150

 156

 164

 161

 158

 147

 150

 176

 183

 182

 181

 181

 159

 172

 181

 181

 180

 175

 183

 175

 183

 182

 147

 130

 158

 201

 202

 207

 208

 207

 207

 209

 212

 215

 209

 212

 210

 210

 216

 222

 222

 222

 218

 215

 213

 216

 215

 211

 208

 209

 209

 211

 211

 196

 180

 189

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2004 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 8, 2004

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 845

 840

 859

 906

 721

 763

 627

 593

 533

 581

 701

 880

 816

 879

 977

 779

 736

 855

 833

 803

 757

 681

 586

 577

 656

 795

 779

 700

 800

 761

 191

 191

 191

 200

 187

 199

 199

 201

 190

 187

 182

 198

 193

 175

 182

 178

 165

 172

 185

 186

 181

 172

 169

 189

 165

 159

 182

 156

 147

 173

 421

 454

 491

 463

 423

 402

 361

 333

 316

 323

 345

 394

 397

 393

 435

 369

 372

 385

 393

 404

 383

 363

 333

 318

 320

 389

 377

 344

 349

 348

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: October 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §286i. Stabilization loans by Bank; amendment to Articles of Agreement

The governor and executive director of the Bank appointed by the United States are directed to obtain promptly an official interpretation by the Bank as to its authority to make or guarantee loans for programs of economic reconstruction and the reconstruction of monetary systems, including long-term stabilization loans. If the Bank does not interpret its powers to include the making or guaranteeing of such loans, the governor of the Bank representing the United States is directed to propose promptly and support an amendment to the Articles of Agreement for the purpose of explicitly authorizing the Bank, after consultation with the Fund, to make or guarantee such loans. The President is authorized and directed to accept an amendment to that effect on behalf of the United States.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §12, 59 Stat. 516.)