alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(No. 4140

#### Claude Lavender, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 9, 1950.*

Thomas B. F. Smith, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Delaney, J.

Claimant, Claude Lavender, was employed on December 11, 1947, as a laborer by respondent in the Division of Highways. On that day while carrying a partially filled can of molten bituminous material claimant stepped on some freshly poured material, lost his balance and fell on the pavement, and the molten contents of the pouring can splashed on his hands, forearm and face. He was taken to Dr. Y. H. Burkhart at Hurst, Illinois. Dr. Burk-hart reported that he had received first degree burns of the face, second degree burns on his left forearm and hand, and third degree burns of the right forearm and hand.

On November 30, 1948, the claimant was examined by Dr. John S. Lewis, who stated claimant’s disability is due to disfigurement caused by the resultant scar from his burn.

*180No jurisdictional question is raised. Respondent and claimant were operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the accident in question arose out of and in the course of employment.

The record consists of the complaint and departmental report and statement, brief and waiver of claimant.

From the evidence in this case and an examination of the scars by Commissioner Summers, the claimant should receive from the respondent for disfigurement to right hand and face twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount paid, under Section 8, Paragraph C, Workmen’s Compensation Act. The Division of Highways has paid Mr. Lavender temporary disability at the rate of $18.00 a week from December 12, A.D., 1947, to February 15, A.D., 1948, inclusive, a total of $169.71. The bill of Dr. Burkhart for treating Mr. Lavender amounting to $72.00 was paid by the Division of Highways. Claimant is, therefore, entitled to an award computed under Section 8, Paragraph C, Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended, in the sum of $325.00, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith.

Genevieve Farmer, Court Reporter, has filed a bill for reporter services in this case in the sum of $15.25. The bill appears reasonable for the services rendered and is hereby allowed.

An award is hereby rendered in favor of Genevieve Farmer in the sum of $15.25.

Genevieve Farmer, Court Reporter, has filed on record a bill for reporter services at a hearing to take additional testimony in this cause, in the.sum of $22.58. The bill appears reasonable for the services rendered and is hereby allowed.

*181An award is hereby rendered in favor of Genevieve Farmer in the sum of $22.58.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Peter Anevski, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of WebMD Health Corp.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. [Intentionally omitted]*

4. [Intentionally omitted]*

5. [Intentionally omitted]*

Date: April 29, 2015



/s/ Peter AnevskiPeter AnevskiChief Financial Officer(Principal financial and accounting officer)




|* | Paragraphs 3 through 5, omitted here, are included in Exhibit 31.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed by WebMD Health Corp. on February 27, 2015.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit








BAR HARBOR BANKSHARES 
EXECUTIVE CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN
Participation Agreement


Participant Name:                     


This Participation Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between Bar Harbor Bankshares, a Maine corporation (the “Company”), and the undersigned individual (“you”), who is an employee of the Company and/or Bar Harbor Bank & Trust, a subsidiary of the Company.
The Company adopted the Bar Harbor Bankshares Executive Change in Control Severance Plan (the “Plan”).  Unless otherwise defined in this Agreement, any capitalized terms used in this Agreement will have the meanings set forth in the Plan. A copy of the Plan is attached as Annex A and is deemed to be part of this Agreement.
The Company has selected you to become a Participant in the Plan.  Under the Plan, you may become entitled to certain Severance Payments if you incur a Qualifying Termination within 12 months after a Change in Control, and you otherwise satisfy all of the terms and conditions of the Plan. 
By executing this Agreement, you acknowledge and agree that you are a Participant in the Plan, and that any Severance Payments that you may become entitled to receive under the Plan will be based on the following multipliers that have been established by the Company:
	
		
	Applicable Severance Multiplier
	Applicable Benefits Multiplier

	[___] months
	[___] months




Further, by executing this Agreement, you acknowledge and agree that your participation in the Plan is in consideration for your strict compliance with the restrictive covenants in Article VIII of the Plan, which include covenants for non-competition, non-solicitation, non-disparagement, and non-disclosure of Confidential Information, and that any Severance Payments that you may become entitled to receive under the Plan will be subject to your strict compliance with each restrictive covenant in Article VIII of the Plan for the duration of the Restrictive Period.
[You previously entered into a Change in Control Agreement with the Company dated [DATE] (the “CIC Agreement”).  By executing this Agreement and becoming a Participant in the Plan, you acknowledge and agree that the CIC Agreement is hereby terminated and you will have no further right, title or interest under the CIC Agreement.] [INCLUDE IF BEING USED TO REPLACE A CIC AGREEMENT]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Agreement by its duly authorized officer as of the date set forth below.  Please sign below and return this Agreement to the Company by no later than [DATE].


	
					
	[PARTICIPANT NAME]
	 
	  BAR HARBOR BANKSHARES

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Signed:    
	 
	 
	By:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date:
	 
	 
	Date:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Title:
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	Date:
	 




            











Annex A:
BAR HARBOR BANKSHARES
Executive Change in Control Severance Plan
PHANTOM 3

In the Box

PROFESSIONAL

© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

Check that all of the following items are in your package. If any items are missing, please 

contact DJI or your local dealer.

Intelligent Flight 

Battery ×1

Gimbal Clamp ×1

Aircraft Body ×1 Remote Controller ×1 Propeller Pairs ×4

16GB Micro-SD 

Card ×1

Manuals

Vibration Absorbers ×4

Power Cable ×1

Anti-drop Kit ×2

Micro-USB Cable ×1

Landing Pads ×4 Propeller Wrench ×1 Stickers ×5 (Gold, 

silver, red, blue, pink)

* Accessories are not covered by warranty.

In the Box

Phantom 3 Professional / Advanced Safety Guidelines and Disclaimer 

Phantom 3 Professional / Advanced Intelligent Flight Battery Safety Guidelines

Phantom 3 Professional Quick Start Guide

Accessories* 

Essentials

Battery Charger ×1
### §2363. Accounting, valuation, reporting, and administration of foreign currencies

#### (a) Responsibility of Secretary of the Treasury; regulations

Under the direction of the President, the Secretary of the Treasury shall have responsibility for valuation and central accounting with respect to foreign credits (including currencies) owed to or owned by the United States. In order to carry out such responsibility the Secretary shall issue regulations binding upon all agencies of the Government.

#### (b) Establishment of exchange rates

The Secretary of the Treasury shall have sole authority to establish for all foreign currencies or credits the exchange rates at which such currencies are to be reported by all agencies of the Government.

#### (c) Repealed. Pub. L. 97–113, title VII, §734(a)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1560

#### (d) Interest income on foreign currency proceeds; regulations; waiver; report to Congress

In cases where assistance is to be furnished to any recipient country in furtherance of the purposes of this chapter or any other Act on a basis which will result in the accrual of foreign currency proceeds to the United States, the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue regulations requiring that agreements, in respect of such assistance, include provisions for the receipt of interest income on the foreign currency proceeds deposited in authorized depositaries: Provided, That whenever the Secretary of State determines it not to be in the national interest to conclude arrangements for the receipt of interest income he may waive the requirement thereof: Provided further, That the Secretary of State, or his delegate, shall promptly make a complete report to the Congress on each such determination and the reasons therefor.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §613, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 443; Pub. L. 89–171, pt. III, §301(c), Sept. 6, 1965, 79 Stat. 659; Pub. L. 94–273, §46, Apr. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 382; Pub. L. 97–113, title VII, §734(a)(1), Dec. 29, 1981, 95 Stat. 1560.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This chapter, referred to in subsec. (d), was in the original "this Act", meaning Pub. L. 87–195, Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 424, known as the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 2151 of this title and Tables.

#### Amendments

1981—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 97–113 struck out subsec. (c) which provided for semi-annual reports on foreign currencies acquired without payment of dollars by the United States. See section 2394(a)(8) of this title.

1976—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 94–273 inserted provision relating to reports after Dec. 31, 1975.

1965—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 89–171 added subsec. (d).

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of President under this section, see Ex. Ord. No. 12163, Sept. 29, 1979, 44 F.R. 56673, as amended, set out as a note under section 2381 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2216 When claims for payment for VR services must be made (filing deadlines). The State VR agency must file a claim for payment in each individual case within the following time periods: ( a ) A claim for payment for VR services based on the completion of a continuous 9-month period of SGA must be filed within 12 months after the month in which the continuous 9-month period of SGA is completed.
( b ) A claim for payment for VR services provided to an individual whose disability or blindness benefits were continued after disability or blindness has ceased because of that individual's continued participation in a VR program must be filed as follows: ( 1 ) If a written notice requesting that a claim be filed was sent to the State VR agency, a claim must be filed within 90 days following the month in which VR services end, or if later, within 90 days after receipt of the notice.
( 2 ) If no written notice was sent to the State VR agency, a claim must be filed within 12 months after the month in which VR services end.
[55 FR 8457, Mar. 8, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 31026, June 19, 1996; 68 FR 40125, July 7, 2003; 83 FR 62461, Dec. 4, 2018]
§ 670.440 What are the responsibilities of outreach and admissions agencies? ( a ) Outreach and admissions agencies are responsible for: ( 1 ) Developing outreach and referral sources;
( 2 ) Actively seeking out potential applicants;
( 3 ) Conducting personal interviews with all applicants to identify their needs and eligibility status; and
( 4 ) Identifying youth who are interested and likely Job Corps participants.
( b ) Outreach and admissions agencies are responsible for completing all Job Corps application forms and determining whether applicants meet the eligibility and selection criteria for participation in Job Corps as provided in §§ 670.400 and 670.410.
( c ) The Secretary may decide that determinations with regard to one or more of the eligibility criteria will be made by the Regional Director.
#### Lena Ciaccio et al. v. Clyde A. Skinner.

Present •—■ Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Glennon, J., taking no part.
#### Edward Blake TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. John C. BURKE, Warden, Wisconsin State Prison, Defendant.

Misc. No. 102.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

Jan. 24, 1968.

Edward Blake Taylor, pro se.

Bronson C. La Follette, Atty. Gen., Madison, Wis., for defendant.

ORDER

MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.

Petitioner, an inmate of the Wisconsin State Prison, seeks to file this cause of action in forma pauperis. He alleges that the respondent has seized certain of his personal possessions.

The possessions allegedly seized fall into two categories: the first consists of articles which are clearly of a personal nature, such as a family photograph album; the second consists of legal papers (copies of legal documents and correspondence that petitioner claims to have sent to state and federal courts). Petitioner has characterized his complaint as one for a writ of prohibition, *869but it appears that he actually seeks a return of the articles or reimbursement for the original cost of those articles which are not returned.

 Petitioner lists three statutes as a basis upon which this court has jurisdiction. None is applicable. It is the general rule that only in exceptional circumstances will a federal court interfere with matters that involve the internal management of a state prison. United States ex rel. Knight v. Ragen, 337 F.2d 425 (7th Cir. 1964). It is clear that this general rule should be followed as applies to the first category of materials allegedly taken from the petitioner.

The second category of confiscated materials, however, presents a closer question. A federal court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to entertain a petition wherein it appears that a state prisoner is unreasonably deprived of a constitutional right to access to the courts. Hatfield v. Bailleaux, 290 F.2d 632 (9th Cir. 1961).

In Roberts v. Pepersack, 256 F.Supp. 415 (D.Md.1966), the petitioner complained that various personal copies of court petitions and court correspondence had been taken from him. The *Roberts*court stated that petitioner had failed to allege that such actions had deprived him of access to the courts, but the court observed that eleven years of receiving petitions from said prisoner established that he had not been deprived of his constitutional rights. With reference to the case at bar, this court has received six petitions from Taylor during the past year; it is obvious that he has not, in fact, been deprived of access to the courts.

Petitioner has not stated a meritorious cause of action. Despite his allegations, it is clear that he has not been deprived of access to the courts. Under the discretion granted this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915,

It is ordered that petitioner be and hereby is denied permission to file this action in forma pauperis.
Exhibit 10.1
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation


	Annual Cash Retainer Fee	     	$68,000
	 	 	 
	Lead Director Additional Annual Cash Retainer		$25,000
	 	 	 
	Annual Equity Retainer (in common stock equivalent)†		$110,000
			 
	Annual Retainer - Committee Member:		
	 	 	 
	Audit		$12,000
		 	
	Leadership Development and Compensation Committee		$6,000
	 	 	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee		$6,000
	 
	Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Chairs:		
	 	 	 
	Audit		$15,000
	 	 	 
	Executive		$15,000
	 	 	 
	Leadership Development and Compensation		$15,000
	 	 	 
	Nominating/Corporate Governance		$15,000
	 
	Subsidiary Board Retainers:*		
	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer- Subsidiary Board Member**		$9,000
	 	 	 
	Additional Annual Retainer- Subsidiary Board Lead Director***		$15,000




In the event of extraordinary circumstances resulting in an excessive number of Board or Committee meetings beyond the typical number of meetings of a Board or Committee in a given year, the Board retains discretion to pay an additional per meeting fee of $1,500 to each attending non-employee director that is a member of such Board or Committee.


† The number of shares to be based upon the closing price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.


* Subsidiary Boards include the Boards of Directors for New Jersey Natural Gas, NJR Energy Services, NJR Clean Energy Ventures and NJR Energy Investments.


**Subsidiary Board Member Annual Retainers and any additional meeting fees are based upon each member only being compensated for one meeting when joint Boards of Directors meetings occur.


***Lead Directors of more than one subsidiary Board will only be paid a single annual retainer fee of $15,000 for service as Lead Director on those Boards.
#### Rose Kepecs, Appellant, v. William J. Dowd et al., Respondents.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00305-CR

NO. 02-12-00306-CR

NO. 02-12-00307-CR

CHRISTOPHER KYLOUNCH

PAYNES

APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Christopher Kylounch Paynes attempts to appeal following his 

pleas of guilty in three cases, two for possession of more than one but less than 

four grams of cocaine and the third for unlawful possession of a firearm. 

Following the plea agreements, the trial court sentenced Appellant to twelve 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

years’ incarceration in each case, each sentence to run concurrently with the 

others.

The trial court’s certifications of Appellant’s right to appeal state in each 

case that this “is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). On July 13, 2012, we notified Appellant that 

these appeals could be dismissed unless he or any party desiring to continue the 

appeals filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeals. Appellant

filed a pro se response that does not present grounds for continuing the appeals.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure are clear that in a plea-bargain 

case, an appellant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written 

motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Because the trial court’s certifications

reflect that Appellant has no right of appeal, we dismiss these appeals for want of 

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 16, 2012
(No. 4318

#### County of Will, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 19, 1950.*

John Irving Peabce, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; William H. Sumptee, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Lansden, J.

A special statute, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, Chap. 65, Secs. 37-39, permits a county, within the borders of which is located a State penal or charitable institution, to bring an action in this Court to recover from respondent the necessary expenses incurred by it or its officers by reason of habeas corpus proceedings therein by or on behalf of inmates of such institution, who were not residents of the county at the time of commitment, and who were not committed by any court of such county.

Proceeding under such.statute, claimant, County of Will, State of Illinois, within the borders of which is located the Illinois State Penitentiary, seeks to recover from respondent the sum of $522.00.

Claimant has previously been granted two awards in similar cases under the same statute. *County of Will*v. *State,*18 C.C.R. 189, and No. 4218, opinion filed May 9, 1950. Those cases and *County of Randolph*v. *State,*
      *106No. 4157, opinion filed February 14, 1950, control this case, and are authorities for an award in this case.

A stipulation of facts has been filed herein, and is hereby approved.

The stipulation discloses that claimant has complied with all statutory prerequisites to recovery. From March 31, 1949, through October 27, 1949, sixty-seven petitions for Writs of Habeas Corpus were filed in the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, by inmates of the Illinois State Penitentiary, who were not residents of the County of Will, or committed by any court therein. In each case the Clerk of the Circuit Court would be entitled to a fee of $5.00, Ill. Rev. Stat. 1947, Chap. 53, Sec. 31, or a total of $335.00. In addition, in some of these cases the Clerk furnished photostatic copies of court records and documents to petitioners, and, in others, including six wherein petitioners paid the filing fee, a photo static copy of the petition was furnished to the Attorney General of the State of Illinois. The cost of such photostatic copies amounted to $187.00.

Claimant seeks no other reimbursable expenses, but is entitled to an award of the full amount sought.

An award is, therefore, entered in favor of the County of Will, State of Illinois, in the sum of $522.00.
§ 654.407 Housing. ( a ) Housing must be structurally sound, in good repair, in a sanitary condition and must provide protection to the occupants against the elements.
( b ) Housing must have flooring constructed of rigid materials, smooth finished, readily cleanable, and so located as to prevent the entrance of ground and surface water.
( c ) The following space requirements must be provided: ( 1 ) For sleeping purposes only in family units and in dormitory accommodations using single beds, not less than 50 square feet of floor space per occupant;
( 2 ) For sleeping purposes in dormitory accommodations using double bunk beds only, not less than 40 square feet per occupant; and
( 3 ) For combined cooking, eating, and sleeping purposes not less than 60 square feet of floor space per occupant.
( d ) Housing used for families with one or more children over 6 years of age must have a room or partitioned sleeping area for the husband and wife. The partition must be of rigid materials and installed so as to provide reasonable privacy.
( e ) Separate sleeping accommodations must be provided for each sex or each family.
( f ) Adequate and separate arrangements for hanging clothing and storing personal effects for each person or family must be provided.
( g ) At least one-half of the floor area in each living unit must have a minimum ceiling height of 7 feet. No floor space may be counted toward minimum requirements where the ceiling height is less than 5 feet.
( h ) Each habitable room (not including partitioned areas) must have at least one window or skylight opening directly to the out-of-doors. The minimum total window or skylight area, including windows in doors, must equal at least 10 percent of the usable floor area. The total openable area must equal at least 45 percent of the minimum window or skylight area required, except where comparably adequate ventilation is supplied by mechanical or some other method.