alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 951.38

 951.08

 950.79

 950.42

 950.05

 949.78

 949.42

 948.94

 948.54

 948.15

 947.98

 947.58

 947.26

 946.98

 946.59

 946.16

 945.80

 945.38

 945.04

 944.72

 944.39

 944.16

 943.86

 943.54

 943.41

 943.18

 942.80

 942.57

 942.38

 942.07

 941.73

 1,899.8

 1,894.8

 1,890.0

 1,883.9

 1,877.8

 1,873.4

 1,867.5

 1,859.6

 1,853.1

 1,846.7

 1,843.9

 1,837.4

 1,832.2

 1,827.7

 1,821.4

 1,814.5

 1,808.7

 1,802.0

 1,796.5

 1,791.4

 1,786.2

 1,782.5

 1,777.7

 1,772.7

 1,770.6

 1,767.0

 1,761.0

 1,757.4

 1,754.4

 1,749.5

 1,744.2

STORAGE

-6.2

-5.0

-4.8

-6.1

-6.1

-4.4

-5.9

-7.9

-6.5

-6.4

-2.8

-6.5

-5.2

-4.5

-6.3

-6.9

-5.8

-6.7

-5.4

-5.1

-5.3

-3.7

-4.8

-5.1

-2.1

-3.6

-6.0

-3.6

-3.0

-4.9

-5.3

CHANGE

 2,572

 3,101

 2,916

 2,524

 2,267

 3,114

 2,548

 1,672

 2,871

 2,501

 4,068

 2,646

 2,791

 3,228

 2,560

 2,427

 2,586

 2,293

 2,509

 2,432

 2,883

 3,420

 3,227

 2,715

 3,982

 3,072

 2,031

 3,091

 3,068

 2,559

 2,365

INFLOW

 5,649

 5,514

 5,223

 5,533

 5,227

 5,255

 5,505

 5,572

 6,048

 5,630

 5,380

 5,869

 5,370

 5,483

 5,659

 5,747

 5,431

 5,611

 5,208

 4,947

 5,443

 5,172

 5,530

 5,207

 4,968

 4,879

 4,982

 4,855

 4,560

 4,961

 5,015

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 24

 102

 112

 73

 121

 97

 24

 72

 115

 81

 86

 48

 38

 33

 71

 175

 71

 75

 47

 56

 89

 94

 98

 61

 51

 28

 70

 60

 14

 56

 32

C.F.S.

 .05

 .21

 .23

 .15

 .25

 .20

 .05

 .15

 .24

 .17

 .18

 .10

 .08

 .07

 .15

 .37

 .15

 .16

 .10

 .12

 .19

 .20

 .21

 .13

 .11

 .06

 .15

 .13

 .03

 .12

 .07

INCHES

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2013 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: December 19, 2013

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -161.9 86,039 165,433 0 0 2,174 4.58 .03

ACRE-FEET -161,900 170,658 328,136 0 0 4,312

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 328,136

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 328,136

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .03

JULY 1, 2013 2.15

 1,906.0

Table 3
### §284s. Ninth replenishment

#### (a) In general

The United States Governor is hereby authorized to agree on behalf of the United States to pay to the Association $3,180,000,000 to the ninth replenishment of the resources of the Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations.

#### (b) Limitations on authorization of appropriations

In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, $3,180,000,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §21, as added Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(a)(1), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2032.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Subsequent Replenishments

Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(2) [title V, §594], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1535, 1501A–122, provided in part that the Secretary of the Treasury may contribute on behalf of the United States to the twelfth replenishment of the International Development Association, and authorized $2,410,000,000 to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation.

Pub. L. 105–118, title V, §560(a), Nov. 26, 1997, 111 Stat. 2425, provided in part that the Secretary of the Treasury may contribute on behalf of the United States to the eleventh replenishment of the resources of the International Development Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations, and authorized $1,600,000,000 to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation.

Pub. L. 103–87, title V, §526, Sept. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 952, provided in part that the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to agree on behalf of the United States to participate in the tenth replenishment of the resources of the International Development Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations, and pursuant to the tenth replenishment authorized $2,500,000,000 to be appropriated.
(No. 6419

#### Dortch The Mover, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 8, 1972.*

Dortch The Mover, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       ARTHUR ANDERSEN L.L.P. LETTERHEAD



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

       As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use our
reports (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made a part of this
registration statement in connection with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan.


Arthur Andersen LLP
Detroit, Michigan
December 17, 1999
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Gregory S. Collett, Principal Financial Officer of DB Commodity Services LLC, the Managing Owner of
PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund (the Trust), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Trusts Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Gregory S. Collett     
|Gregory S. Collett         
|Principal Financial Officer

Date: March 27, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4372 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.4372

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
           the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, as the Barry G. Miller Post 
                                 Office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. BARRY G. MILLER POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 15 Rochester Street, Bergen, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Barry G. Miller Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Barry G. 
Miller Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

**Estimated Costs:**

Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- hours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost (@$8 5 / h our) Parts Cost Total Costs (labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Pin programming 3.0 $ 255.00 $0 $ 255.00 

### 953 $ 243,015.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00


### The known number of products in co mpliance: 

### 0 Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 243,015 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### 0

**On**

**- Condition Co**  **sts:**
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- hours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product



### Replace FAC 3.0 $ 255.00 $ 

### 0 $ 255.00 

### Replace FWC 3.0 $ 255.00 $ 255.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:**
Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:**
Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO Explanation:

**Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:**
This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific r equirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,056.11

 1,056.06

 1,056.00

 1,055.94

 1,055.88

 1,055.85

 1,055.80

 1,055.76

 1,055.72

 1,055.61

 1,055.57

 1,055.44

 1,055.37

 1,055.35

 1,055.35

 1,055.28

 1,055.23

 1,055.01

 1,054.82

 1,054.68

 1,054.68

 1,054.76

 1,054.67

 1,054.50

 1,054.34

 1,054.34

 1,054.23

 1,054.13

 1,053.98

 1,053.91

 1,053.72

 4,234.8

 4,233.4

 4,231.7

 4,230.0

 4,228.3

 4,227.4

 4,226.0

 4,224.9

 4,223.7

 4,220.6

 4,219.5

 4,215.8

 4,213.8

 4,213.2

 4,213.2

 4,211.2

 4,209.8

 4,203.5

 4,198.2

 4,194.2

 4,194.2

 4,196.5

 4,193.9

 4,189.1

 4,184.6

 4,184.6

 4,181.5

 4,178.6

 4,174.4

 4,172.4

 4,167.1

STORAGE

+1.7

-1.4

-1.7

-1.7

-1.7

-0.9

-1.4

-1.1

-1.1

-3.1

-1.1

-3.7

-2.0

-0.6

+0.0

-2.0

-1.4

-6.3

-5.4

-4.0

+0.0

+2.3

-2.5

-4.8

-4.5

+0.0

-3.1

-2.8

-4.2

-2.0

-5.4

CHANGE

 6,273

 4,563

 4,812

 4,627

 4,809

 5,594

 5,146

 4,939

 5,080

 4,925

 5,573

 4,227

 4,959

 5,941

 5,850

 5,047

 5,798

 3,153

 4,039

 4,396

 5,996

 6,852

 4,893

 4,299

 3,604

 5,004

 4,944

 4,419

 4,463

 4,828

 4,120

INFLOW

 5,242

 5,090

 5,425

 5,403

 5,577

 5,974

 5,855

 5,462

 5,628

 6,251

 5,895

 5,890

 5,820

 5,853

 5,725

 5,800

 6,264

 6,124

 6,492

 6,069

 5,913

 5,653

 6,077

 6,475

 5,828

 4,796

 6,297

 5,571

 6,369

 5,548

 6,478

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 167

 193

 251

 84

 92

 50

 8

 50

 25

 251

 251

 200

 142

 375

 125

 250

 250

 183

 258

 324

 83

 58

 100

 249

 58

 208

 216

 274

 232

 274

 340

C.F.S.

 .20

 .23

 .30

 .10

 .11

 .06

 .01

 .06

 .03

 .30

 .30

 .24

 .17

 .45

 .15

 .30

 .30

 .22

 .31

 .39

 .10

 .07

 .12

 .30

 .07

 .25

 .26

 .33

 .28

 .33

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .17

 .45

 .51

 .13

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .78

 .02

 .00

 .22

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2016 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 19, 2016

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -65.9 153,173 180,844 0 0 5,621 6.75 2.37

ACRE-FEET -65,900 303,819 358,704 0 0 11,149

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 358,704

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 358,704

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.37

JULY 1, 2015 65.77

 4,233.1

Table 3
(No. 73—CC—32

#### Fehrenbach Chevrolet, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 16, 1973.*

Fehrenbach Chevrolet, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 667.650 What procedures apply to the appeals of the Governor's imposition of sanctions for substantial violations or performance failures by a local area? ( a ) A local area which has been found in substantial violation of WIA title I, and has received notice from the Governor that either all or part of the local plan will be revoked or that a reorganization will occur, may appeal such sanctions to the Secretary under WIA section 184(b). The sanctions do not become effective until: ( 1 ) The time for appeal has expired; or
( 2 ) The Secretary has issued a decision.
( b ) A local area which has failed to meet local performance measures for two consecutive years, and has received the Governor's notice of intent to impose a reorganization plan, may appeal such sanctions to the Secretary under WIA section 136(h)(1)(B).
( c ) Appeals made under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section must be filed no later than 30 days after receipt of written notification of the revoked plan or imposed reorganization, and must be submitted by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC 20210, Attention: ASET. A copy of the appeal must be simultaneously provided to the Governor.
( d ) The Secretary may consider any comments submitted in response by the Governor.
( e ) The Secretary will notify the Governor and the appellant in writing of the Secretary's decision under paragraph (a) of this section within 45 days after receipt of the appeal. The Secretary will notify the Governor and the appellant in writing of the Secretary's decision under paragraph (b) of this section within 30 days after receipt of the appeal.
Exhibit 10.16

[NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. LETTERHEAD]

[Grant Date]

[Grantee Name]

[Grantee Address]

Dear [Grantee Name]:

Pursuant to the NTELOS
Holdings Corp. Non-Employee Director Equity Plan (the Plan), the Board of Directors of NTELOS Holdings Corp. (the Board) hereby grants to you [            ] shares
of Restricted Stock, par value $.01 per share (the Award).

This Award is subject to the applicable terms and conditions of the
Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and in the event of any contradiction, distinction or difference between this letter and the terms of the Plan, the terms of the Plan will control. All capitalized terms used herein have the meanings
set forth herein or in the Plan, as applicable.

Subject to your continued service as a director on the Board, your Award will become 100%
fully vested on [            ]. Your Award shall be forfeitable until it vests and, unless otherwise provided by the Board, any portion of your Award that is not vested as of the date of
your termination of service as a director on the Board shall be forfeitable with no further compensation due to you.

Any portion of your
Award that is not then vested shall become 100% fully vested immediately before the consummation of a Change in Control provided you are still serving as a director on the Board at such time.

The Company may impose any additional conditions or restrictions on the Award as it deems necessary or advisable to ensure that all rights granted under the
Plan satisfy the requirements of applicable securities laws. The Company shall not be obligated to issue or deliver any shares if such action violates any provision of any law or regulation of any governmental authority or national securities
exchange.

The Board may amend the terms of this Award to the extent it deems appropriate to carry out the terms of the Plan. The construction
and interpretation of any provision of this Award or the Plan shall be final and conclusive when made by the Board.

Nothing in this letter
shall confer on you the right to continue as a director on the Board.



---

Please sign and return a copy of this agreement to
[            ], designating your approval of this letter. This acknowledgement must be returned within thirty (30) days; otherwise, the Award will lapse and become null and void. Your
signature will also acknowledge that you have received and reviewed the Plan and that you agree to be bound by the applicable terms of such document.



|                          |  | 
|------------------------- |  | 
|Very truly yours,        
|                         
|NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.    
|                          | 
|By:                       |  | 
|                         
|ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED
|                         
|                         
|                          | 
|Dated:                    |  | 

Enclosures        (Copy of Plan)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mariano DEL CID-MENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40177.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*581James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, FEderal Public Defender’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Mariano Del Cid-Mendez appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry. Del Cid challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), (2) and, additionally, the district court’s application of the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines.

Del Cid’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). Although Del Cid contends that *Almendarez-Torres*was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule *Almendarez-Torres*in light of *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that *Almendarez-Torres*remains binding. *See United States v. Garza-Lopez,*410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 126 S.Ct. 298, 163 L.Ed.2d 260 (2005). Del Cid properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of *Almendarez-Torres*and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Del Cid also contends that the district court erred in sentencing him pursuant to the mandatory Guidelines regime held unconstitutional in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764-65, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). The Government concedes that Del Cid has preserved this issue on appeal. The sentencing transcript is devoid of evidence that the district court would have imposed the same sentence under an advisory regime, and, therefore, the Government has not borne its burden of establishing beyond a reasonable doubt that the district court’s error was harmless. *See United States v. Walters,*418 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir.2005). Thus, Del *582Cid’s sentence is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. *See id.*at 466.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Great Hudson Fur Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Mayer Messinger et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Peek, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
<page> EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A. Rothman,
President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		August 15, 2005
### §1642h. Prohibition against payment of award to certain persons

No award shall be made on any claim under section 1642c of this title to or for the benefit of (1) any person who has been convicted of a violation of any provision of chapter 115 of title 18, or of any other crime involving disloyalty to the United States, or (2) any claimant whose claim under this subchapter is within the scope of subchapter III of this chapter.

(Mar. 10, 1950, ch. 54, title IV, §409, as added Pub. L. 85–604, §1, Aug. 8, 1958, 72 Stat. 529.)
### §4307. Preemption

Notwithstanding any other law, no act of any Federal agency shall be effective to confer or deny any benefit with respect to any foreign mission contrary to this chapter. Nothing in section 4302, 4303, 4304, or 4305 of this title may be construed to preempt any State or municipal law or governmental authority regarding zoning, land use, health, safety, or welfare, except that a denial by the Secretary involving a benefit for a foreign mission within the jurisdiction of a particular State or local government shall be controlling.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title II, §207, as added Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §202(b), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 288.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 204 of Pub. L. 97–241, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.