alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 218.9 When an employee annuity begins. ( a ) *Full-age annuity* —employee has completed 10 years but less than 30 years of service. An employee full-age annuity begins on the later of either the date chosen by the applicant or the earliest date permitted by law. The earliest date permitted by law is the latest of— ( 1 ) The day after the day the claimant last worked for a railroad employer;
( 2 ) The first day of the month in which the claimant attains full retirement age; or
( 3 ) The first day of the sixth month before the month in which the application is filed.
( b ) *Reduced-age annuity* —employee has completed 10 years but less than 30 years of service. An employee reduced-age annuity begins on the later of either the date chosen by the applicant, or the earliest date permitted by law. The earliest date permitted by law is the latest of— ( 1 ) The day after the day the claimant last worked for a railroad employer;
( 2 ) The first day of the first full month in which the claimant is age 62; or
( 3 ) The first day of the month in which the application is filed if the claimant does not have a spouse (or divorced spouse) who would be entitled to a retroactive unreduced spouse (or divorced spouse) annuity. If the claimant has such a spouse (or divorced spouse) the claimant's annuity can begin on the first day of the month in which the spouse (or divorced spouse) annuity begins.
( c ) *Disability annuity.* An employee disability annuity begins on the later of either the date chosen by the applicant or the earliest date permitted by law. The earliest date permitted by law is the latest of— ( 1 ) The day after the day the claimant last worked for a railroad employer;
( 2 ) The first day of the twelfth month before the month in which the application is filed;
( 3 ) The first day of the sixth month after the month of disability onset; or
( 4 ) The first day of the month of disability onset if the claimant was previously entitled to an employee disability annuity which ended within five years of the current disability onset month.
( d ) *Annuity based on at least 30 years of service.* An employee annuity based on at least 30 years of service begins on the later of either the date chosen by the applicant or the earliest date permitted by law. The earliest date permitted by law is the latest of— ( 1 ) The day after the day the claimant last worked for a railroad employer;
( 2 ) The first day of the first full month in which the claimant is age 60 and will accept a reduced annuity;
( 3 ) The first day of the month in which the claimant attains age 62; or
( 4 ) The first day of the sixth month before the month in which the application is filed.
[54 FR 30725, July 24, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 39010, July 1, 2003]
EXHIBIT 11



                      FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION
               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

               For the Three Month Period Ended June 30,
                             2003 and 2002

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

(Dollars in Thousands)
                                               2003             2002

                                          <c>              <c>
Primary
  Net Income                                 $        3,635   $        3,391
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                 2,956,433        2,975,180
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                      None             None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                               2,956,433        2,975,180

      Primary earnings per
        common share                         $    1.23        $    1.14


Assuming full dilution
  Net Income                                 $        3,635   $        3,391
    Shares
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding                 2,964,592        2,978,542
      Adjustments - increases or
        decreases                                      None             None
      Weighted average number of
        common shares outstanding
        as adjusted                               2,964,592        2,978,542

      Earnings per common share
        assuming full dilution               $    1.23        $    1.14

</TABLE>


                                   25
In The Matter Of: JETTECH, LLC Respondent 

### SERVED: October 14, 2016 

## U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

**TRANSPORT ~~A~E**  **N1** 

## Of OFFICE OF HEARINGS



## ~R~ **SPOR1'~iiON** WASHINGTON, DC 

## p

**~~** 

## 28
) ) ) ) ) 

### 16\~ 

## OCl \U 

## oocKEi OPERt-. 1\0NS DocketNo. FAA-2013-1079 Case No. 2012NM030058

DISMISSAL ORDER



# . (

# .. _ On October 13, 2016, the parties submitted a Stipulated Motionto Withdraw Request for Hearing and Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice, stating that the parties had reached a settlement in this matter. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.215, a party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case with prejudice.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. These proceedings are dismissed with prejudice. 2. The hearing scheduled to begin on May 16, 2017 is cancelled.



# -:k:/~=-----

**~DOUGLAS** M. RAW ALD Administrative LawJudge
Attachment: Service ListDocketNo. FAA-2013-1079 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001

### ONE COPY Michael L. Poindexter, Respondent's Counsel Law Offices ofMichael L. Poindexter · 2132 Montane Drive E. Golden, CO 80401 TEL: 303-526-1980 FAJ(: 303-526-1981 Kyle E. Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel Office ofRegional Counsel, Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAJ(: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (£11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
### §3241. Congressional declaration of policy

The United States is committed to continued strong support for the principles of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, to a strengthened and more effective International Atomic Energy Agency and to a comprehensive safeguards system administered by the Agency to deter proliferation. Accordingly, the United States shall seek to act with other nations to—

(a) continue to strengthen the safeguards program of the IAEA and, in order to implement this section, contribute funds, technical resources, and other support to assist the IAEA in effectively implementing safeguards;

(b) ensure that the IAEA has the resources to carry out the provisions of Article XII of the Statute of the IAEA;

(c) improve the IAEA safeguards system (including accountability) to ensure—

(1) the timely detection of a possible diversion of source or special nuclear materials which could be used for nuclear explosive devices;

(2) the timely dissemination of information regarding such diversion; and

(3) the timely implementation of internationally agreed procedures in the event of such diversion;

(d) ensure that the IAEA receives on a timely basis the data needed for it to administer an effective and comprehensive international safeguards program and that the IAEA provides timely notice to the world community of any evidence of a violation of any safeguards agreement to which it is a party; and

(e) encourage the IAEA, to the maximum degree consistent with the Statute, to provide nations which supply nuclear materials and equipment with the data needed to assure such nations of adherence to bilateral commitments applicable to such supply.

(Pub. L. 95–242, title II, §201, Mar. 10, 1978, 92 Stat. 124.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Mar. 10, 1978, except as otherwise provided and regardless of any requirements for the promulgation of implementing regulations, see section 603(c) of Pub. L. 95–242, set out as a note under section 3201 of this title.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         299,236
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               374,360
<PP&E>                                       5,411,378
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,121,078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,696,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          235,661
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,461,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,696,954
<SALES>                                      2,469,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,507,417
<CGS>                                        2,040,731
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,040,731
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               387,170
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 79,516
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             79,516
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    79,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.73
        



</TABLE>
#### § 662.280 Does title I require One-Stop partners to use their funds for individuals who are not eligible for the partner's program or for services that are not authorized under the partner's program?

No, the requirements of the partner's program continue to apply. The Act intends to create a seamless service delivery system for individuals seeking workforce development services by linking the One-Stop partners in the One-Stop delivery system. While the overall effect is to provide universal access to core services, the resources of each partner may only be used to provide services that are authorized and provided under the partner's program to individuals who are eligible under such program. (WIA sec. 121(b)(1).)
Order entered February 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01166-CV

JOHN GLAD, Appellant

V.

JAMES PATTERSON RAMSEUR AS GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE AND

PERSON OF JULIA DIXON RAMSEUR, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-02022-1

ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

The reporter’s record is overdue in this appeal. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS court 

reporter Ann Brockington to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either: (1) 

written verification no hearings were recorded; (2) written verification appellant has not 

requested or paid for the reporter’s record; or (3) the complete reporter’s record, including 

exhibits. We notify appellant that if we receive verification of non-payment, we will order the 

appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Ann 

Brockington, official court reporter of the Probate Court No. 1, and to counsel for all parties

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.








/s/Richard
      W. McCullough
              
              February
      25, 2009Richard
      W. McCulloughChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
                Petroleum
      Development Corporation
                Managing
      General Partner





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.345 Use of date of oral inquiry as application filing date. We will use the date of an oral inquiry about SSI benefits as the filing date of an application for benefits only if the use of that date will result in your eligibility for additional benefits and the following requirements are met: ( a ) The inquiry asks about the claimant's eligibility for SSI benefits.
( b ) The inquiry is made by the claimant, the claimant's spouse, or a person who may sign an application on the claimant's behalf as described in § 416.315.
( c ) The inquiry, whether in person or by telephone, is directed to an office or an official described in § 416.310(b).
( d ) The claimant or a person on his or her behalf as described in § 416.315 files an application on a prescribed form within 60 days after the date of the notice we will send telling of the need to file an application. The notice will say that we will make an initial determination of eligibility for SSI benefits if an application form is filed within 60 days after the date of the notice. (We will send the notice to the claimant or, where he or she is a minor or incompetent, to the person who made the inquiry.)
( e ) ( 1 ) The claimant is alive when the application is filed on a prescribed form, or
( 2 ) If the claimant dies after the oral inquiry is made, the deceased claimant's surviving spouse or parent(s) who could be paid the claimant's benefits under § 416.542(b), or someone on behalf of the surviving spouse or parent(s) files an application form. If we learn that the claimant has died before the notice is sent or within 60 days after the notice but before an application form is filed, we will send a notice to such a survivor. The notice will say that we will make an initial determination of eligibility for SSI benefits only if an application form is filed on behalf of the deceased within 60 days after the date of the notice to the survivor.
[45 FR 48120, July 18, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 13493, Apr. 21, 1986; 58 FR 52912, Oct. 13, 1993]
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-2805

___________ Daniel J. Dykema, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * Tax Court. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: January 27, 2012 Filed: January 31, 2012

___________ Before MURPHY, ARNOLD and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Daniel Dykema appeals a decision of the tax court 1 which dismissed his petition challenging a notice of deficiency issuedby the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, upheld the assessments set forth in the notice of deficiency, and imposed sanctions against him for asserting frivolous argum ents. The Commissioner urges affirmance and has moved for sanctions on appeal. After careful review, we conclude th at dismissal of Dykema’s petition was appropriate for the reasons explained by the tax court. We also agree with the tax

1 The Honorable Mark V. Holmes, United States Tax Court Judge.court that Dykema’s arguments below were frivolous, and we find no abuse of discretion in the court’s imposition of sanctions.
As to the Commissioner’s motion for sanc tions on appeal, we may award “just damages” and single or double co sts if we determine that an appeal is frivolous. See Fed. R. App. P. 38; 28 U.S.C . § 1912. In the present appeal, Dykema has raised the same tax-protestor arguments he asserted below, all of which have been repeatedly rejected by the courts as frivolous. Cf. United States v. Gerads , 999 F.2d 1255, 1256 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (in government ’s action to recover back taxes from tax protestor defendants, noting th at appellate court had previ ously held wages are within Code’s definition of income, and rejecti ng defendants’ argument that they were not citizens of United States but rather werecitizens of “Republic of Minnesota” who were not subject to income tax); see also United States v. Clayton , 506 F.3d 405, 412 (5th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (noting that court previously had rejected as “patently frivolous” and “absurd” argument that inco me derived from sources within United States is non-taxable). In these circum stances, we conclude that sanctions are appropriate. See Gerads , 999 F.2d at 1256-57 (granting government’s request that court impose sanctions against appellant s for bringing frivolous appeal based on discredited, tax-protestor arguments). Accordingly, we affirm th e tax court’s judgment, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we grant the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions in the amount of $5,000.

_____________________

-2-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 167

 173

 180

 180

 169

 148

 129

 128

 132

 155

 164

 180

 181

 169

 153

 164

 178

 175

 178

 185

 193

 192

 191

 189

 181

 181

 185

 190

 188

 187

 139

 139

 141

 136

 128

 107

 90

 89

 77

 92

 101

 112

 128

 121

 123

 126

 131

 135

 140

 145

 149

 157

 158

 163

 165

 163

 163

 167

 172

 173

 150

 152

 155

 157

 149

 129

 112

 108

 103

 113

 126

 145

 152

 146

 136

 141

 149

 153

 154

 157

 162

 169

 169

 170

 170

 168

 171

 176

 177

 177

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2018 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: May 1, 2018

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
§ 662.310 Is there a single MOU for the local area or are there to be separate MOU's between the Local Board and each partner? ( a ) A single “umbrella” MOU may be developed that addresses the issues relating to the local One-Stop delivery system for the Local Board, chief elected official and all partners, or the Local Board, chief elected official and the partners may decide to enter into separate agreements between the Local Board (with the agreement of the chief elected official) and one or more partners. Under either approach, the requirements described in this subpart apply. Since funds are generally appropriated annually, financial agreements may be negotiated with each partner annually to clarify funding of services and operating costs of the system under the MOU.
( b ) WIA emphasizes full and effective partnerships between Local Boards, chief elected officials and One-Stop partners. Local Boards and partners must enter into good-faith negotiations. Local Boards, chief elected officials and partners may request assistance from a State agency responsible for administering the partner program, the Governor, State Board, or other appropriate parties. The State agencies, the State Board, and the Governor may also consult with the appropriate Federal agencies to address impasse situations after exhausting other alternatives. The Local Board and partners must document the negotiations and efforts that have taken place. Any failure to execute an MOU between a Local Board and a required partner must be reported by the Local Board and the required partner to the Governor or State Board, and the State agency responsible for administering the partner's program, and by the Governor or the State Board and the responsible State agency to the Secretary of Labor and to the head of any other Federal agency with responsibility for oversight of a partner's program. (WIA sec. 121(c).)
( c ) If an impasse has not been resolved through the alternatives available under this section any partner that fails to execute an MOU may not be permitted to serve on the Local Board. In addition, any local area in which a Local Board has failed to execute an MOU with all of the required partners is not eligible for State incentive grants awarded on the basis of local coordination of activities under 20 CFR 665.200(d)(2). These sanctions are in addition to, not in lieu of, any other remedies that may be applicable to the Local Board or to each partner for failure to comply with the statutory requirement.