alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
128 STAT. 2092 PUBLIC LAW 113–219—DEC. 16, 2014 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4189: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 8, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 113–219 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4000 Leap 

Road in Hilliard, Ohio, as the ‘‘Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master 

Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MASTER SERGEANT SHAWN T. HANNON, MASTER SERGEANT JEFFREY J. RIECK AND VETERANS MEMORIAL 

POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4000 Leap Road in Hilliard, Ohio, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master 

Sergeant Jeffrey J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Master Sergeant Shawn T. Hannon, Master Sergeant Jeffrey 

J. Rieck and Veterans Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 4189] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLAWLAW
§ 668.440 How is funding for supplemental youth services determined? ( a ) Beginning with PY 2000, supplemental youth funding will be allocated to eligible INA grantees on the basis of the relative number of Native American youth between the ages of 14 and 21, inclusive, in the grantee's designated INA service area as compared to the number of Native American youth in other eligible INA service areas. We reserve the right to redetermine this youth funding stream in future program years, in consultation with the Native American Employment and Training Council, as program experience warrants and as appropriate data become available.
( b ) The data used to implement this formula is provided by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
( c ) The hold harmless factor described in § 668.296(c) also applies to supplemental youth services funding. This factor also will be determined in consultation with the grantee community and the Native American Employment and Training Council.
( d ) The reallocation provisions of § 668.296(d) also apply to supplemental youth services funding.
( e ) Any supplemental youth services funds not allotted to a grantee or refused by a grantee may be used for the purposes outlined in § 668.296(e), as described in § 668.294. Any such funds are in addition to, and not subject to the limitations on, amounts reserved under § 668.296(e).
The Commodity Futures Trading 

Commission (CFTC) is the 

federal government agency 

that regulates the commodity 

futures, commodity options, 

and swaps trading markets. 

As part of that responsibility, 

the CFTC has instituted a 

Reparations Program.

File a Complaint

if you would like to file a reparations complaint, 

please visit www.cftc.gov/tiporComplaint.

reparations 

program

Commodity Futures trading Commission

1155 21st Street, NW

Washington, DC 20581

866.366.2382 (Consumer Hotline)

202.418.5514 (TTY)

www.cftc.gov/ConsumerProtection/ReparationsProgram 

Commodity Futures trading Commission 
Common reparations Claims

 Misrepresentation

 Breach of Fiduciary Duty

 Unauthorized Trading 

 Misappropriation

 Churning

 Wrongful Liquidation 

 Failure to Supervise 

 Nondisclosure

a Complete Complaint must inClude:

 CFTC Form 30

 Contact Information 

 Contact Information For Respondents

 Description of Complaint

 Damage Calculation

 Parallel Proceedings Statement 

 Bankruptcy or Receivership Statement 

 Verification Statement 

 “I hereby affirm (under penalty of law) 

that to the best of my knowledge the facts 

set forth in this complaint are known or 

believed to be true.” 

 Proceeding Selection 

 Appropriate Filing Fee Payment
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 106

 108

 86

 81

 79

 79

 78

 82

 107

 102

 93

 80

 80

 80

 83

 105

 108

 89

 87

 95

 97

 96

 83

 83

 82

 82

 104

 106

 94

 105

 77

 81

 77

 75

 75

 75

 74

 74

 75

 84

 78

 76

 76

 76

 79

 79

 84

 84

 83

 82

 88

 79

 80

 79

 78

 78

 79

 84

 84

 86

 85

 90

 82

 77

 76

 76

 76

 77

 86

 91

 81

 78

 77

 77

 80

 91

 92

 86

 84

 85

 92

 83

 81

 81

 80

 80

 90

 95

 88

 92

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 7, 2013

HIGH LOW MEAN

 61.8

 60.9

 60.0

 60.0

 60.1

 60.3

 60.1

 58.7

 57.1

 55.9

 53.9

 53.0

 53.0

 53.8

 54.3

 55.4

 59.4

 59.0

 58.9

 58.3

 58.8

 57.7

 56.2

 55.5

 54.8

 54.8

 55.0

 57.0

 56.7

 59.2

 59.9

 58.9

 57.8

 57.5

 57.5

 57.9

 57.7

 57.2

 55.8

 54.1

 52.1

 50.7

 50.6

 51.3

 51.7

 53.3

 55.2

 57.4

 57.2

 56.3

 57.7

 56.1

 54.4

 53.5

 52.7

 52.3

 53.2

 54.2

 55.1

 56.7

 60.6

 59.9

 59.0

 58.8

 58.9

 59.2

 59.0

 58.1

 56.6

 55.1

 53.1

 52.0

 52.0

 52.6

 53.1

 54.3

 56.8

 58.1

 58.0

 57.5

 58.2

 56.9

 55.4

 54.6

 53.9

 53.7

 54.1

 55.2

 55.8

 58.2

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.7

 8.9

 9.0

 9.2

 9.3

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.7

 10.1

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.1

 9.7

 9.2

 9.3

 9.5

 9.3

 9.5

 9.7

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 10.0

 9.6

 9.2

 8.8

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.8

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.3

 9.5

 10.0

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 9.6

 9.1

 8.9

 8.9

 9.0

 9.0

 9.0

 9.2

 9.4

 9.5

 9.6

 9.6

 9.2

 8.9

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.8

 9.0

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.5

 9.9

 10.2

 10.2

 10.1

 10.0

 9.8

 9.4

 9.1

 9.0

 9.2

 9.1

 9.2

 9.4

 9.6

 9.7

 9.7

 9.7

 9.5

 9.1

 8.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.13 Review of PWDs. ( a ) *Request for review of PWDs.* Any employer desiring review of a PWD must make a written request for such review to the NPWC Director within 7 business days from the date the PWD is issued. The request for review must clearly identify the PWD for which review is sought; set forth the particular grounds for the request; and include any materials submitted to the NPWC for purposes of securing the PWD.
( b ) *NPWC review.* Upon the receipt of the written request for review, the NPWC Director will review the employer's request and accompanying documentation, including any supplementary material submitted by the employer, and after review shall issue a Final Determination letter; that letter may: ( 1 ) Affirm the PWD issued by the NPWC; or
( 2 ) Modify the PWD.
( c ) *Request for review by BALCA.* Any employer desiring review of the NPWC Director's decision on a PWD must make a written request for review of the determination by BALCA within 10 business days from the date the Final Determination letter is issued. ( 1 ) The request for BALCA review must be in writing and addressed to the NPWC Director who made the final determinations. Upon receipt of a request for BALCA review, the NPWC will prepare an appeal file and submit it to BALCA.
( 2 ) The request for review, statements, briefs, and other submissions of the parties must contain only legal arguments and may refer to only the evidence that was within the record upon which the decision on the PWD was based.
( 3 ) BALCA will handle appeals in accordance with § 655.61.
# WEST VIRGINIA 

# I De44ot.Mat-kIn 

### This Box .* - 

# ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 

# DIVISION Form #I


## - - - ------ - ----- --- - ------ -- 

# SECRETARY OF 

# STATE Betty 

## Ireland

NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING ONA PROPOSED RULE 2C7? I! .' 

### . 

## -
~ I .: "J.J--"J 

# . , 

## .- % -



### AGENCY: WV Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality 

### TITLE NUMBER: 45 

### RULE 

### TYPE: Legislative 

### CITE AUTHORITY: A

### M 

### EN 

### D M E

### N 

### T T O AN 

### EX I S 

### T IN G 

### R

### U

### LE 

### : Y

### E S 

# J NO 

# EII IF YES, SERIES NUMBER OF RULE BEING AMENDED: 45CSR'4 Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major Stationary Sources of Air 

### TITLE OF RULE BEING AMENDED: Pollution for the Prevention of Sienificant Deterioration


### IF NO, SERIES NUMBER OF RULE BEING PROPOSED: TITLE OF RULE BEING PROPOSED:

DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: Monday, August 11,2008 

### TIME: 6:00 p.m. 

### LOCATION OF 

### PUBLIC HEARING: WV Department of Environmental Protection Coopers Rock Conference Room 601 57th Street, S.E.



### DATE WRITTEN COMMENT PERIOD ENDS: Monday$ August 2008 

### TIME: At close of hearing 

### WRITTEN COMMENTS MAY BE MAILED TO: The Department requests that persons wishing to make Ct? WV Department of Environmental Protection comments at the hearing make an effort to submit written 601 57th Street, S.E. comments in order to facilitate the review of these comments. Charleston. WV 25304 

# L%i~kLive Rule-Making The issues to be heard shall be limited to the prop e
ATTACH A 

### B R

### IEF S UMM A RY O F Y O UR PROP&~L--- 

# 9 

# ,m Review Cornmitt 

# ee
Notes on phone conversation between Matthew LaPenta (Abt Associates) and Kip Howlett, 

Hardwood Plywood and Veneer Association, November 29, 2010.

1. 250 is too large a number for the number of kitchen cabinet laminated

product manufacturers - it is fewer than a dozen. Said Dick Titus told him

this and I pointed out that he told me that was the case for KCMA members.

When I asked if smaller manufacturers not as well represented by KCMA might

do this he said they would. (However, that is not consistent with what CMA

said).

2. 250 residential and 500 office furniture manufacturers is about right

for furniture manufacturers who make laminated products

3. About 70% of EWF production is fully laid up (subject to CARB). There

are 26-28 EWF manufacturers. When I said that I thought there were 5-10 who

laid up the plywood themselves he said that was much too low. (This

implies that we were missing a significant number of EWF manufacturers from

our survey sample).

4. 100 is about right for the number of custom panel manufacturers making

laminated products

5. Imported Chinese EWF, furniture, and ready-to-assemble kitchen cabinets

represents $5 billion worth of HWPW compared to the domestic HWPW industry

which is $3-$4 billion.

6. North American HWPW production is: 33% EWF, 33% Canada/West of Rockies,

and 33% I5 Corridor

7. 60% of HWPW production is veneer core

8. 98% of EWF is veneer core

9. Cabinets are 100% veneer core

10. 40% of HWPW market is cut-to-size

11. Product lines for CARB can be represented by the product with the most

porous species of face veneer and thickest core of the same type (separate

testing for each face veneer type is not necessary)

12. Would not estimate share of HWPW production that is laminated products
### §62. Manufacture, shipment, or delivery for shipment in interstate or foreign commerce prohibited

It is declared that filled milk, as defined in section 61 of this title, is an adulterated article of food, injurious to the public health, and its sale constitutes a fraud upon the public. It shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture within any Territory or possession, or within the District of Columbia, or to ship or deliver for shipment in interstate or foreign commerce, any filled milk.

(Mar. 4, 1923, ch. 262, §2, 42 Stat. 1487.)
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22685-22686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy


Interagency Management Task Force Public Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of 
Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) will hold public 
meetings of the Interagency Energy Management Task Force (Task Force) 
in 2011. FEMP intends to hold recurring public meetings of the Task 
Force. Interested parties can check http://www.femp.energy.gov/news/events.html for the time, location, agenda, and related materials of 
the meetings. The purpose of the town hall meetings is to provide 
information on current Federal energy management activities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hayes Jones, Federal Energy Management 
Program; EE-2L; 1000 Independence Ave., SW.; Washington, DC 20585; 
(202) 586-8873. More information on DOE's Federal Energy Management 
Program can be found at http://www.femp.energy.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Energy Management Program 
(FEMP), within the Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency 
and Renewable Energy, facilitates the Federal Government's 
implementation of sound, cost-effective energy management and 
investment practices to enhance the nation's energy security and 
environmental stewardship. In support of this goal, the FEMP Program 
Manager chairs the Interagency Task Force (Task Force). The Task Force 
was created by the Federal Energy Management Improvement Act of 1988 
(Pub. L. 100-615) to coordinate the activities of the Federal 
Government in promoting energy conservation and the

[[Page 22686]]

efficient use of energy and in informing non-Federal entities of the 
Federal experience in energy conservation. The Task Force is composed 
of Federal energy managers. The purpose of these public Town Hall 
meetings is to present information related to Federal energy management 
and reporting requirements. The meetings may also present an 
opportunity for public comment on activities related to Federal energy 
management. The Task Force establishes working groups to address 
specific technical or programmatic issues and to develop new 
initiatives. It also serves as a forum for sharing lessons learned 
across Federal agencies.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2011.
Jerry Dion,
Supervisor, Federal Market Development, Federal Energy Management 
Program, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. 2011-9830 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
### §2211c. Poverty measurement methods

The Administrator of the Agency, in consultation with financial intermediaries and other appropriate organizations, should have in place at least 1 method for implementing partners to use to assess poverty levels of their current incoming or prospective clients.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §254, as added Pub. L. 108–484, §3, Dec. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 3926; amended Pub. L. 115–428, §4(d), Jan. 9, 2019, 132 Stat. 5514.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2019—Pub. L. 115–428 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to development of poverty measurement methods and application of methods.
### §5722. Presidential order

#### (a) Presidential determination

On or after July 1, 1997, whenever the President determines that Hong Kong is not sufficiently autonomous to justify treatment under a particular law of the United States, or any provision thereof, different from that accorded the People's Republic of China, the President may issue an Executive order suspending the application of section 5721(a) of this title to such law or provision of law.

#### (b) Factor for consideration

In making a determination under subsection (a) with respect to the application of a law of the United States, or any provision thereof, to Hong Kong, the President should consider the terms, obligations, and expectations expressed in the Joint Declaration with respect to Hong Kong.

#### (c) Publication in Federal Register

Any Executive order issued under subsection (a) shall be published in the Federal Register and shall specify the law or provision of law affected by the order.

#### (d) Termination of suspension

An Executive order issued under subsection (a) may be terminated by the President with respect to a particular law or provision of law whenever the President determines that Hong Kong has regained sufficient autonomy to justify different treatment under the law or provision of law in question. Notice of any such termination shall be published in the Federal Register.

(Pub. L. 102–383, title II, §202, Oct. 5, 1992, 106 Stat. 1453.)
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.12 Use of registration of H-2B employers. ( a ) Upon approval of the *H-2B Registration,* the employer is authorized for the specified period of up to 3 consecutive years from the date the *H-2B Registration* is approved to file an *Application for Temporary Employment Certification,* unless: ( 1 ) The number of workers to be employed has increased by more than 20 percent (or 50 percent for employers requesting fewer than 10 workers) from the initial year;
( 2 ) The dates of need for the job opportunity have changed by more than a total of 30 calendar days from the initial year for the entire period of need;
( 3 ) The nature of the job classification and/or duties has materially changed; or
( 4 ) The temporary nature of the employer's need for services or labor to be performed has materially changed.
( b ) If any of the changes in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section apply, the employer must file a new *H-2B Registration* in accordance with § 655.11.
( c ) The *H-2B Registration* may not be transferred from one employer to another unless the employer to which it is transferred is a successor in interest to the employer to which it was issued.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.808 Under what circumstances may random investigations be conducted? ( a ) The Administrator may conduct random investigations of an employer during a five-year period beginning with the date of any of the following findings, provided such date is on or after October 21, 1998: ( 1 ) A finding by the Secretary that the employer willfully violated any of the provisions described in § 655.805(a)(1) through (9);
( 2 ) A finding by the Secretary that the employer willfully misrepresented material fact(s) in a labor condition application filed pursuant to § 655.730; or
( 3 ) A finding by the Attorney General that the employer willfully failed to meet the condition of section 212(n)(1)(G)(i)(II) of the INA (pertaining to an offer of employment to an equally or better qualified U.S. worker).
( b ) A finding within the meaning of this section is a final, unappealed decision of the agency. See §§ 655.520(a), 655.845(c), and 655.855(b).
( c ) An investigation pursuant to this section may be made at any time the Administrator, in the exercise of discretion, considers appropriate, without regard to whether the Administrator has reason to believe a violation of the provisions of this subpart I and subpart H of this part has been committed. Following an investigation, the Administrator shall issue a determination in accordance with § 655.815.
[65 FR 80236, Dec. 20, 2000]
```

[113th Congress Public Law 228]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2116]]

Public Law 113-228
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for the approval of the Amendment to the Agreement Between 
the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the 
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland for Cooperation on 
the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual Defense Purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 
                         2014 -  [H.R. 5681]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE 
                              GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF 
                              AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE 
                              UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND 
                              NORTHERN IRELAND FOR COOPERATION ON 
                              THE USES OF ATOMIC ENERGY FOR MUTUAL 
                              DEFENSE PURPOSES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the provisions for congressional 
consideration of a proposed agreement for cooperation in subsection d. 
of section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2153), the 
amendments to the Agreement Between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 
Northern Ireland for Cooperation on the Uses of Atomic Energy for Mutual 
Defense Purposes, done at Washington, July 22, 2014, and transmitted to 
Congress on July 24, 2014, including all portions thereof (hereinafter 
in this section referred to as the ``Amendment''), may be brought into 
effect on or after the date of the enactment of this Act as if all the 
requirements in such section 123 for consideration of the Amendment had 
been satisfied, subject to subsection (b) of this section.
    (b) Applicability of Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and Other Provisions 
of Law.--Upon coming into effect, the Amendment shall be subject to the 
provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) and 
any other applicable United States law as if the Amendment had come into 
effect in accordance with the requirements of section 123 of the Atomic 
Energy Act of 1954.

    Approved December 16, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5681:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            Nov. 19, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
§ 658.710 Decision of the Administrative Law Judge. ( a ) The ALJ has jurisdiction to decide all issues of fact and related issues of law and to grant or deny appropriate motions, but does not have jurisdiction to decide upon the validity of Federal statutes or regulations.
( b ) The decision of the ALJ must be based on the hearing record, must be in writing, and must state the factual and legal basis of the decision. The ALJ's decision must be available for public inspection and copying.
( c ) Except when the case involves the decertification of a SWA, the decision of the ALJ will be considered the final decision of the Secretary.
( d ) If the case involves the decertification of an appeal to the SWA, the decision of the ALJ must contain a notice stating that, within 30 calendar days of the decision, the SWA or the Administrator may appeal to the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, by filing an appeal with the Administrative Review Board in accordance with 29 CFR part 26.
[81 FR 56352, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 86 FR 1778, Jan. 11, 2021]