alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 13, 2015

t1110 

# Order

Clerk November 13, 2015

149663

ROBERTO LANDIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149663

COA: 309258

Saginaw CC: 08

- 002400

- NZ

HEALTHSOURCE SAGINAW, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral

arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we VACATE our order of

April 3, 2015. The application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2014 judgment of the Court

of Appeals is DENIED, because we are no longer persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2012346EN.01000101.xml

| 14.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/1

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2013 under certain quotas opened by the Union for pigmeat products

2012/C 346/01

Commission Regulation (EC) No 442/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of pigmeat products. The import licence applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2012 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2012 are, for quotas 09.4038, 09.4170 and 09.4204, for quantities smaller than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 January to 31 March 2013; they are set out in the Annex to this communication.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 129, 28.5.2009, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2013
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4038 | 16 768 108 |
| 09.4170 | 2 361 000 |
| 09.4204 | 2 312 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2013

(in kg)

09.4038

16 768 108

09.4170

2 361 000

09.4204

2 312 000

---
EXHIBIT 21.1 

SUBSIDIARIES OF BLACKROCK CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION 

 

| Name                  |   | Jurisdiction   |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------|
| BKC ASW Blocker, Inc. |   | Delaware            |
| BCIC-MBS, LLC         |   | Delaware            |

 

In addition, we may be deemed to control certain portfolio companies identified as “Controlled Investments” in footnotes to the Consolidated Schedule of Investments at December 31, 2021 included in the Consolidated Financial Statements portion of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41078

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR BANOS AGUILAR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-42-38

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Oscar Banos Aguilar has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Banos Aguilar has filed a response. Our independent

review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Aguilar’s response discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 10, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-41078

2

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 32.2



March 21, 2006

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Michael J. Castellano
|Michael J. Castellano       
|Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

E NRIQ UE ANT H O NY G O D O Y ,

Pe t i tione r-Appe lla

nt,
v. M ARIO N SPE ARM AN ,

R e sponde nt-Appe lle e . No. 13-56024 D.C . No. 2:10-c v-07927-R -AGR C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia , Los Ange le s
O R DE R
T H O M A S , C hie f Judge : Upon thevote of a

m a jority of nonre c use d

a c tive judge s, it is ordere d tha t this c a s e be re he ard e n ba n c pursua nt to Fe de ra l R

ule of Appe lla

te Proc e dure 35(a )
and C irc u it R

ule 35-3. The thre e -judge pa ne l disposition in this ca s e sha ll not be
c ite d a s pre c e de nt by or to a ny c ourt of theNinth C irc uit. Judge Gra

be r did not pa

rtic ipate in thede l ibe rat ions or votein this c a se .



# F IL ED
M AR 2 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Managers

DB Commodity Services
LLC:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-158733) of PowerShares DB Commodity
Index Tracking Fund and Subsidiary of our reports dated February 24, 2010, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition, including the consolidated schedules of investments, of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and
Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income and expenses, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of PowerShares DB Commodity Index Tracking Fund and Subsidiary. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports dated June 18, 2010, with respect to the statements of financial condition, including the schedules of investments of DB Commodity Index Tracking Master Fund as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related
statements of income and expenses, changes in unitholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of DB Commodity Index TrackingMaster Fund.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP                    
|New York, New York June 18,
2010
1

The Honorable Charles B. Kornmann, United States District Judge for the

District of South Dakota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-3968

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of South Dakota.

Todd Brave Crow, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 19, 2006

Filed: October 20, 2006

___________

Before MURPHY, BYE, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Todd Brave Crow pleaded guilty to assault resulting in serious bodily injury,

and was sentenced to 33 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release. After

Brave Crow began serving his supervised release, the probation officer petitioned for

revocation, alleging that Brave Crow had violated his release conditions. Brave Crow

admitted violating the conditions of his supervised release as alleged. At a

subsequent revocation hearing, the district court1

 revoked supervised release and

imposed a new sentence of 24 months in prison, commenting on the Chapter 7
-2-

Guidelines recommended range, Brave Crow’s prior and current supervised release

violations, and his failure to pay restitution, and also noting that due to his record

leniency was not appropriate. Brave Crow appeals his revocation sentence.

The revocation sentence was within authorized limits, and the district court

considered appropriate factors in imposing it. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(a), 3583(e)(3).

We conclude that Brave Crow’s sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v.

Tyson, 413 F.3d 824, 825 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam) (revocation sentences are

reviewed for unreasonableness in accordance with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.

220 (2005)). 

Accordingly, we affirm. 

______________________________
# Appendix 1 v2

# Well log descriptors
**Exhibit 31.1: Sarbanes-Oxley Certification**I, Robert Perret, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10- K (the "Annual Report"), and all reports on Form 8- K containing distribution reports (collectively with this Annual Report, the "Reports") filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by this Annual Report, of the Trust; Based on my knowledge, the information in the Reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this Annual Report; Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement , for inclusion in the Reports is included in the Reports; Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included in this Annual Report and required to be delivered to the Trustee in accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and except as disclosed in the Reports, the Servicer has fulfilled its obligations under such agreement; and The Reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, that is included in such report. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  1.2.3.4.5.March 31, 2006                                             Date:Re: Wachovia Mortgage Loan Trust, LLC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 2005-ARobert PerretDirector/s/  Robert Perret                                            Wachovia Mortgage Loan Trust LLCNational City Mortgage Co., as ServicerWells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Servicer
EXHIBIT 31(a)CERTIFICATIONSCERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Michael J. Quillen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K (this“Report”) of Alpha NR Holding,Inc. (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this Report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 31, 2006    /s/Michael J. Quillen Michael J. Quillen  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 411.455 What is the purpose of an IWP?

The purpose of an IWP is to outline the specific employment services, vocational rehabilitation services and other support services that the EN and beneficiary have determined are necessary to achieve the beneficiary's stated employment goal. An IWP provides written documentation for both the EN and beneficiary. Both parties should develop and implement the IWP in partnership. The EN shall develop and implement the plan in a manner that gives the beneficiary the opportunity to exercise informed choice in selecting an employment goal. Specific services needed to achieve the designated employment goal are discussed and agreed to by both parties.
(No. 73-CC-108

#### Kenneth E. Wheeler, Et Al., Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 25, 1973.*

Henry W. Gauwitz, Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-4 (Reg. No. 333-81255) of Lear Corporation of our report
dated March 31, 1999 relating to the financial statements of UT Automotive, Inc.
(formerly a wholly-owned operating segment of United Technologies Corporation),
appearing in Lear Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 4, 1999. We
also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Registration Statement.

                                          /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Detroit, Michigan

October 15, 1999
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATION
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this annual report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;
 4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15-d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosures controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/
Ion G. VarouxakisIon G. VarouxakisChief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 110

 111

 109

 109

 108

 106

 106

 107

 104

 104

 104

 107

 108

 109

 112

 113

 113

 112

 111

 111

 111

 111

 112

 112

 112

 111

 111

 110

 109

 108

 91

 93

 95

 95

 89

 91

 91

 91

 92

 94

 96

 99

 103

 106

 108

 109

 110

 111

 110

 110

 110

 110

 109

 97

 95

 106

 107

 106

 105

 104

 105

 105

 104

 104

 102

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 101

 103

 105

 107

 109

 110

 111

 111

 111

 110

 110

 111

 111

 109

 107

 109

 110

 109

 107

 106

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 7, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
From: Blodgett, Terry L. [mailto:Terry.Blodgett@alcoa.com] 

Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 3:34 PM 

To: Putney, David 

Cc: Palazzolo, Michael A. 

Subject: RE: Alcoa - Rockdale actual emissions data 

Hi David, 

Let me ask this first to make sure we’re not missing an opportunity to keep things simple/straight 

forward. My guess is you’re already working with these numbers but I just want to double check. So 

Alcoa Rockdale does have four remaining potlines (5, 6, 7, and 8). Much work went into establishing 

production limits for NSR permitting: 

Potline Annual Production Limit in US Short Tons 

5 44,900 

6 44,900 

7 64,300 

8 64,300 

Thanks David, 

Terry 

From: Putney, David [mailto:putney.david@epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 2:17 PM 

To: Blodgett, Terry L. 

Cc: Palazzolo, Michael A. 

Subject: EXT: Alcoa - Rockdale actual emissions data 

Hello Terry, 

It is my understanding that the primary aluminum industry is “protective” of the actual 

production numbers for each individual facility. However, the draft risk assessment for your 

facility is showing higher than expected preliminary acute risk estimates due to nickel emissions. 

Note that the actual emissions estimates (which are used to estimate acute risks) included in the

input file to the risk model were based on the nominal production capacity of each facility. 

Therefore, it would be very helpful if I could, in some way, put an upper bound on the actual 

production (and the associated emissions) for your primary aluminum production facility. 

As I mentioned above, it is my understanding that the actual production data for your facility is 

sensitive. However, would it be possible for you to give me some kind of upper bound on your 

production during the most recent year of operation? Perhaps you could let me know that only 

X of the facility’s 4 potlines (I believe it is now 4 potlines for this facility) were operating or that 

the facility produced less than XX% of its capacity during the most recent year of operation? Any 

method of quantifying production so that I can more accurately and reasonably estimate the 

actual Ni emissions would be helpful. 

 p. 1 of 1
(No. 74-CC-26

#### Koeber’s Artificial Limb Company, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed February 14, 1974.*

Koeber’s Artificial Limb Company, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Martin A. Soll, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C. J.
#### § 641.500 Who is eligible to participate in the SCSEP?

Anyone who is at least 55 years old, unemployed (as defined in § 641.140), and who is a member of a family with an income that is not more than 125 percent of the family income levels prepared by the Department of Health and Human Services and approved by OMB (Federal poverty guidelines) is eligible to participate in the SCSEP. (OAA sec. 518(a)(3), (9).) A person with a disability may be treated as a “family of one” for income eligibility determination purposes at the option of the applicant.

[82 FR 56883, Dec. 17, 2017]
§ 404.1800 Introduction. After we have made a determination or decision that you are entitled to benefits under title II of the Act, we begin paying those benefits to you as soon as possible. This subpart explains— ( a ) What we must do so that your benefits begin promptly;
( b ) When and how you may request that payment of benefits be expedited;
( c ) When we may cause your benefits to be withheld;
( d ) Our obligation not to assign or transfer your benefits to someone; and
( e ) When we will use one check to pay benefits to two or more persons in a family.