alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
94°31'50" 94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

39 °01'20"

39 °01'30"

39 °01'40"

Figure 2.1. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction between 63rd Street and Blue Parkway.

0 50 100 150 200 METERS

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 13,930 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 750 feet

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

Hardesty

Brighton

Avenue

Avenue

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.630 How will we notify you when we decide you need a representative payee? ( a ) We notify you in writing of our determination to make representative payment. This advance notice explains that we have determined that representative payment is in your interest, and it provides the name of the representative payee we have selected. We provide this notice before we actually appoint the payee. If you are under age 15, an unemancipated minor under the age of 18, or legally incompetent, our written notice goes to your legal guardian or legal representative. The advance notice: ( 1 ) Contains language that is easily understandable to the reader.
( 2 ) Identifies the person designated as your representative payee.
( 3 ) Explains that you, your legal guardian, or your legal representative can appeal our determination that you need a representative payee.
( 4 ) Explains that you, your legal guardian, or your legal representative can appeal our designation of a particular person to serve as your representative payee.
( 5 ) Explains that you, your legal guardian, or your legal representative can review the evidence upon which our designation of a particular representative payee is based and submit additional evidence.
( b ) If you, your legal guardian, or your legal representative objects to representative payment or to the designated payee, we will handle the objection as follows: ( 1 ) If you disagree with the decision and wish to file an appeal, we will process it under subpart N of this part.
( 2 ) If you received your advance notice by mail and you protest or file your appeal within 10 days after you receive the notice, we will delay the action until we make a decision on your protest or appeal. (If you received and signed your notice while you were in the local field office, our decision will be effective immediately.)
[69 FR 60238, Oct. 7, 2004]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,009.83

 1,009.83

 1,009.93

 1,009.95

 1,009.98

 1,010.03

 1,010.12

 1,010.03

 1,009.76

 1,009.52

 1,009.34

 1,009.24

 1,009.28

 1,009.18

 1,009.20

 1,009.02

 1,008.71

 1,008.58

 1,008.42

 1,008.11

 1,007.91

 1,007.84

 1,007.69

 1,007.50

 1,007.31

 1,007.16

 1,007.18

 1,007.19

 1,007.16

 1,007.07

 3,047.9

 3,047.9

 3,050.2

 3,050.6

 3,051.3

 3,052.4

 3,054.5

 3,052.4

 3,046.3

 3,040.8

 3,036.7

 3,034.4

 3,035.3

 3,033.0

 3,033.5

 3,029.4

 3,022.3

 3,019.3

 3,015.7

 3,008.7

 3,004.1

 3,002.5

 2,999.2

 2,994.9

 2,990.6

 2,987.2

 2,987.6

 2,987.8

 2,987.2

 2,985.1

STORAGE

+4.3

+0.0

+2.3

+0.5

+0.7

+1.1

+2.1

-2.1

-6.2

-5.5

-4.1

-2.3

+0.9

-2.3

+0.5

-4.1

-7.1

-3.0

-3.6

-7.0

-4.5

-1.6

-3.4

-4.3

-4.3

-3.4

+0.5

+0.2

-0.7

-2.0

CHANGE

 7,023

 4,201

 4,472

 4,809

 5,010

 5,449

 5,820

 5,317

 2,316

 2,755

 3,044

 4,105

 6,162

 4,959

 4,919

 3,506

 2,206

 5,278

 5,453

 4,696

 4,547

 5,563

 4,277

 4,552

 4,231

 3,693

 3,712

 3,509

 4,503

 4,402

INFLOW

 4,833

 4,201

 3,280

 4,464

 4,549

 4,777

 4,602

 6,158

 5,261

 5,352

 4,970

 5,063

 5,520

 5,963

 4,642

 5,446

 5,559

 6,567

 7,073

 7,989

 6,621

 6,161

 5,960

 6,565

 6,284

 5,244

 3,351

 3,236

 4,686

 5,295

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 0

 40

 115

 115

 94

 175

 202

 168

 168

 148

 195

 181

 148

 47

 134

 201

 201

 214

 260

 213

 200

 27

 153

 113

 159

 133

 159

 159

 133

C.F.S.

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .17

 .17

 .14

 .26

 .30

 .25

 .25

 .22

 .29

 .27

 .22

 .07

 .20

 .30

 .30

 .32

 .39

 .32

 .30

 .04

 .23

 .17

 .24

 .20

 .24

 .24

 .20

INCHES

 1.28

 1.52

 .14

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .50

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2000 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 2, 2000

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -58.4 134,489 159,672 0 0 4,255 6.36 3.62

ACRE-FEET -58,400 266,759 316,709 0 0 8,440

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 316,709

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 316,709

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 3.62

JULY 1, 2000 3.63

 3,043.5

Table 3
Exhibit 99.1
 For Immediate Release
 Globecomm Enters Into a New Credit Facility with Citibank
 Increase in Facility from $65 Million to $ 72.5 Million
 HAUPPAUGE, N.Y., July 19, 2011 /BusinessWire/ Globecomm Systems Inc. (NASDAQ:
GCOM)
   About Globecomm Systems
   This press release contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions
of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward looking statements are based
on managements current expectations and observations. You should not place undue reliance on our
forward-looking statements because the matters they describe are subject to certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Our forward-looking statements are
based on the information currently available to us and speak only as of the date of this press
release. Over time, our actual results, performance or achievements may differ from those expressed
or implied by our forward-looking statements, and such differences might be significant and
materially adverse to our security holders.
 We have identified some of the important factors that could cause future events to differ from our
current expectations and they are described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and most
recent Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q, including without limitation under the captions Risk
Factors and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, and in other documents that we may file with the SEC, all of which you should review
carefully. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light




---



##### 



of those risks as you read this press release.
 For Globecomm Investor Relations information, please contact:     ir@globecommsystems.com
 Company Information:      http://www.globecommsystems.com
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersignedcertify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Steven R. Williams                                                                                                   | Ma | September 7, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-------------------|
| Steven R. Williams, 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                                               |    |
| Petroleum Development Corporation, 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant                                          |    |
|                                                                                                                          |    |
|                                                                                                                          |    |
| /s/ Darwin L. Stump                                                                                                      |    | September 7, 2006 |
| Darwin L. Stump                                                                                                          |    |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer 

Petroleum Development Corporation, 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant |    |

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided theRegistrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(No. 74-CC-686

#### W. W. Davidson, M.D., S.C., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 13, 1974.*

W. W. Davidson, M.D., S.C., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

          - [Docket Number NIOSH-033]

# AGENCY:

                        National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),                               ( print page 22107)                            Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).                    

# ACTION:

Notice of issuance of final guidance publication.

# SUMMARY:

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the availability of the following publication: NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide.

# ADDRESSES:

This document may be obtained by the following methods:

*Mail:*                         NIOSH, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS-C19, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226.                    

*E-mail: pubstaft@cdc.gov.*

*Web site: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/​pubs/​niosh.aspx.*

*Facsimile:*                         (513) 533-8285.                    

*Telephone:*                         (513) 533-8471.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Faye Rice, NIOSH, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS-C32, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226, telephone (513) 533-8335.

Dated: April 11, 2011.

John M. Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2011-9426 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
### **CHAPTER 22—NATIONAL DRUG CONTROL POLICY**

Sec.
1701.
Definitions.
1702.
Office of National Drug Control Policy.
1703.
Appointment and duties of Director and Deputy Directors.
1704.
Coordination with National Drug Control Program agencies in demand reduction, supply reduction, and State and local affairs.
1705.
Development, submission, implementation, and assessment of National Drug Control Strategy.
1706.
High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Program.
1707.
Repealed.
1708.
Emerging Threats Committee, plan, and media campaign.
1708a.
Repealed.
1709.
Repealed.
1710.
Drug Interdiction Coordinator and Committee.
1710a.
Requirement for disclosure of Federal sponsorship of all Federal advertising or other communication materials.
1711.
Authorization of appropriations.
1712.
Repealed.
1713.
Authorization of use of environmentally-approved herbicides to eliminate illicit narcotics crops.
1714.
Awards for demonstration programs by local partnerships to coerce abstinence in chronic hard-drug users under community supervision through the use of drug testing and sanctions.
1715.
GAO audit.
§ 258.3 Application for witnesses. ( a ) Any person or persons conducting a hearing pursuant to the provisions of this part or part 260 of this chapter may, upon such person's or persons' own motion or upon application of any party to such hearing, issue a subpoena for a witness or witnesses. An application for a subpoena shall be by affidavit filed with the person or persons conducting the hearing within such period of time as will permit service and return of a subpoena prior to the date set for the hearing at which the witness is to appear, but in no case shall such application be filed later than 10 days prior to the date of hearing. The application shall set forth: ( 1 ) The name and address of the witness;
( 2 ) The title of the matter to be heard, i.e., names of parties;
( 3 ) The issue to which the testimony of the witness will be directed;
( 4 ) The substance of the testimony which such witness is expected to give or the facts to which such witness will testify; and
( 5 ) The specific books, papers or documents which are requested, if a subpoena duces tecum is applied for.
( b ) In addition to the above, the party filing such application shall, at the time of filing, deposit therewith a sum of money sufficient to cover the fees and transportation allowance of the witness, or, in lieu thereof, shall state in the application that satisfactory arrangements have been made with the witness for the direct payment of his or her fees and transportation allowance and any other allowable expense.
## THEA'I[ToRNEy GENERAL

GERXD C. MANN ATIy)RNEy GNCNR**Ausxmv 11.**  **TEXAS**

Honorable Qeo. Comptrolle~:~of Austin, Texas Dear Sir.: B

. Sheppard

Pub1ic Accounts

OpinioneNo

’

. 0%49, Re: Whether ,under’ -facts given” the El Paso ’ Nbwspaper Quild:-,iti -~ liable fol? 20$. ‘tax as provided by Article 7047f, R.C.S. ,,

.,, ,~, We are in’re6eipt of yam letter of June 15;1939, ‘ ~ln connection with which ~JTOU ~6ubml.t

,to us:.~the,,following faots: ,._~, -. ’ ~. ,, . . :, ,; ._ ;:- _: ,1 / 1:.~~ :< c,!<; VTK4El, Past &&&& ~G&;iT-& :.the.;,l&8i ‘ bf: taco ., ’ .;,: ;.,, American Newspaper ,Guild. It ‘a membars ar’e ‘ cotipOii&-- of HlitOrial department work&s ,ti~~El, 

### Pasb's‘dailg~ri&?s~ papers, & laboa’uM.& o?ganieeiJ ln an6ffort t6 bettq working condltlpns’ ,and titiandatids. of, Jocal:.e<brial, .,. ‘ ~ department employes, r6port*e, copg readers, etc. “ ~. ~,..:

. . -.

“ ‘The Guild on Nay ’ 6~ held 8 &avlr&on whic’K.it.~bo~~ tlclc6tb .at tie ,dolltir~ each. P&$&e ‘ .6Y the’ :drawing was to raltie funds’ to send our-local ,delegate to the ~.-- AmeCicati News@ag6r Guild conventloti. ’ Th6 Guild deducted 20 Peru cent, of, total roceeds fbr ita .tr’ &asurg aiia’ - . ’ distributed the b&lance in prizes: The) ’drawing Wtis held In the usual- manner, ’ 10 stubs being drawn ~from” all ‘ those ~aold, and the holders ,of these tickets receiving the prices

. ” YOUrequest our opinion. as to whether or not ’under the above circumstances the awards or prlses given ln~connectlon ulth the drawingV ’mentloned are taxable under Article 7047f, Revised Cfvll Statutes.

Article 7047r, Section (a) and the first Section (b) read as follows: sentence in

“ ‘ (a) Every pereon, firm, or corporation conducting a theatre,? place of amusement, or any businees enterprise in ccinnectlon with the operation- of whlch’a. ‘pFl.ze In thb form of money’ or something of Va1u.e ‘Ts i5ffeMd or gfven to one OF more’ patrons of ‘such theatre, ‘Dlace of amusement, or business enterprise, and not, given toRon. Geo. H. Sheppard, page 3 o-849

Yours very truly ATTORNEYGENERAL

OF TEXAS Bg s/Glenn R. Lewis Glenn R. Lewis Assistant GRL:N:uc APPROTW)

JUN -.24, 1939 s/Gerald C. Mann ATTORNRXGENRRALOF TEXAS

. Approved Opinion Committee By s/BW Chairman
### §284w. Multilateral debt relief

#### (a) Authorization of contribution

The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to contribute, on behalf of the United States, not more than $356,000,000 to the International Development Association for the purpose of funding debt relief under the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative in the period governed by the fifteenth replenishment of resources of the International Development Association, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations and without prejudice to any funding arrangements in existence on June 24, 2009.

#### (b) Appropriations

In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, not more than $356,000,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

#### (c) Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative

In this section, the term "Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative" means the proposal set out in the G8 Finance Ministers' Communique entitled "Conclusions on Development," done at London, June 11, 2005, and reaffirmed by G8 Heads of State at the Gleneagles Summit on July 8, 2005.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §25, as added Pub. L. 111–32, title XI, §1109(a), June 24, 2009, 123 Stat. 1901.)
From: Gormas, Michael (OST) 

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 8:50 PM

To: 'cityoffalsepass@ak.net'; 'falsepasstribe@gmail.com'; 'abailey@aeboro.org'; 'Larue, Troy E (DOT)'; 

'Bruce McGlasson'; 'cityofclarkspoint@gci.net'

Cc: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST); 'Rich.Sewell@alaska.gov'; 

'Verne.skagerberg@alaska.gov'

Subject: Essential Air Service at Clark’s Point-False Pass-South Naknek, Alaska

Hello everyone,

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Clark’s Point, False Pass, and 

South Naknek, AK, as well as give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we 

submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. 

We issued Order 2015-4-14 (April 17, 2015), requesting proposals from airlines interested in providing 

EAS. In response to our request, we received one proposal from Grant Aviation.

I have attached the proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov

soon. I request that you review the proposal and submit any comments you may have as soon as 

possible, but no later than Thursday, June 18, 2015. Please send your comments directly via e-mail to 

michael.gormas@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on 

the distribution list. 

Please direct all questions regarding this proposal to Michael Gormas at michael.gormas@dot.gov.

Best Regards,

Michael D. Gormas

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

202.366.1853
Exhibit 32.2 

**Certification Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2003 (the“Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of myknowledge, that: 

    (1)                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

    (2)                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

October 15, 2003 

/s/Steven C. Ramsey

StevenC. Ramsey
#### § 614.23 Finality of findings.

The findings of a Federal military agency referred to in §§ 614.21 and 614.22, and the Schedules of Remuneration issued by the Department pursuant to the Act and § 614.12, shall be final and conclusive for all purposes of the UCX Program, including appeal and review pursuant to § 614.7 or § 614.17.

[53 FR 40555, Oct. 17, 1988]
#### Marvellous A. GREENE, Sr., Plaintiff — Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; et al., Defendants — Appellees.

No. 05-56051.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 2006.*

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*782Marvellous A. Greene, Sr., HDSP— High Desert State Prison, Susanville, CA, pro se.

Before: FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Marvellous A. Greene, Sr. (referring to himself as Marvellous Asha Xwah), a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that prison officials interfered with his right to access the courts. The district court terminated this action after it denied Greene IFP status on the grounds that he had accrued “three strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s interpretation of section 1915(g) and related legal conclusions, *Andrews v. King,*398 F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir.2005), and we affirm.

The district court properly denied Greene leave to proceed IFP because at the time he sought IFP status, he had filed three actions that qualified as “strikes,” and he did not allege he was in imminent danger of serious physical harm. *See*28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); *Tierney v. Kupers,*128 F.3d 1310, 1311-12 (9th Cir.1997).

We construe the district court’s termination of the action as a dismissal without prejudice to Greene’s filing a new action upon payment of the filing fees.

The remaining contentions lack merit.

Greene’s December 14, 2005 motion to remand this action to the district court is denied.

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.984 If you are statutorily blind and still working.

There is no requirement that you be unable to work in order for us to find that you are blind. However, if you are working, your earnings will be considered under the income and resources rules in subparts K and L of this part. This means that if your income or resources exceed the limitations, you will not be eligible for benefits, even though you are blind.