alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §281l. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act Aug. 5, 1947, ch. 498, §13, 61 Stat. 783, provided that Institute of Inter-American Affairs be subject to provisions of the Government Corporation Control Act. See Codification note set out under section 281 of this title.
#### UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Appellant, v. Robert *W.*TARKINGTON et al.

No. 15101.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1954.

Robert S. Lindsey and Wright, Harrison, Lindsey & Upton, Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

Joseph Morrison, Stuttgart, Ark., Joe P. Melton, Lenoke, Ark., J. Phillip Carroll, Little Rock, Ark., Rose, Meek, House, Barron & Nash, Little Rock, Ark., J. B. Reed, Lenoke, Ark., and Lawrence B. Burrow, Jr., Little Rock, Ark., for ap-pellees.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on dismissal of appeal filed by appellant.
§ 408.802 When will we suspend your SVB payments? ( a ) *When suspension is proper.* Suspension of SVB payments is required when you no longer meet the SVB qualification requirements (*see* subpart B of this part) and termination in accordance with §§ 408.814 through 408.818 does not apply. (This subpart does not cover suspension of payments for administrative reasons, as, for example, when mail is returned as undeliverable by the Postal Service and we do not have a valid mailing address for you or when your representative payee dies and a search is underway for a substitute representative payee.)
( b ) *Effect of suspension.* When we correctly suspend your SVB payments, we will not resume them until you again meet all qualification requirements except the filing of a new application. If you request reinstatement, you are required to submit the evidence necessary to establish that you again meet all requirements for eligibility under this part. Your SVB payments will be reinstated effective with the first month in which you meet all requirements for eligibility except the filing of a new application.
----

----

| (1)   | The      Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the      “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or      78o(d)); and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Michael V. Shustek          |
|--------------------------------------|
| Michael      V. Shustek              |
| Chief      Executive Officer         |
| Vestin      Realty Mortgage II, Inc. |

| /s/      Rocio Revollo               |
|--------------------------------------|
| Rocio      Revollo                   |
| Chief      Financial Officer         |
| Vestin      Realty Mortgage II, Inc. |
### §3721. Accounting policies

#### (a) Establishment and maintenance of accounts; specifications

The Commission shall establish and maintain its accounts pursuant to chapter 91 of title 31 and the provisions of this part. Such accounts shall specify all revenues received by the Commission, including tolls for the use of the Panama Canal, expenditures for capital replacement, expansion, and improvement, and all costs of maintenance and operation of the Panama Canal and of its complementary works, installations, and equipment, including depreciation, payments to the Republic of Panama under the Panama Canal Treaty of 1977, and interest on the investment of the United States calculated in accordance with section 3793 of this title.

#### (b) Regulations establishing the basis of accounting for assets

The Commission may issue regulations establishing the basis of accounting for the assets which are made available for the use of the Commission. Such regulations may provide for depreciation of the net replacement value of the assets which will ultimately require replacement to maintain the service capacity of the Panama Canal. Such regulations may also provide that depreciation of such assets be recorded ratably over their service lives.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1311, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 479; Pub. L. 104–201, div. C, title XXXV, §3541(a), Sept. 23, 1996, 110 Stat. 2866.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1996—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 104–201 substituted "chapter 91 of title 31" for "the Accounting and Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U.S.C. 65 et seq.)".
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Cherokee 8A Group, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63237

)

Under Contract No. W912DS-16-C-0005 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: John Manfredonia, Esq.

 Manfredonia Law Offices, LLC

 Cresskill, NJ

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Rita Fang, Esq.

Lorraine C. Lee, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer District, New York

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 20, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63237, Appeal of Cherokee 8A 

Group, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: September 20, 2022

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### § 418.2301 What is an initial determination regarding your income-related monthly adjustment amount?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1301, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
### **CHAPTER 41—NATIONAL READING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM**
Editorial Note on Part 606
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 606 appear at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006.

§ 606.21 Criteria for cap. ( a ) *Reduction in unemployment tax effort.* ( 1 ) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of § 606.20, a reduction in a State's unemployment tax effort will have occurred with respect to a taxable year if any action is or was taken (legislative, judicial, or administrative,) that is effective during the 12-month period ending on September 30 of such taxable year, which has resulted in or will result in a reduction of the amount of contributions paid or payable or the amounts that were or would have been paid or payable but for such action.
( 2 ) Actions that will result in a reduction in tax effort include, but are not limited to, a reduction in the taxable wage base, the tax rate schedule, tax rates, or taxes payable (including surtaxes) that would not have gone into effect but for the legislative, judicial, or administrative action taken. Notwithstanding the foregoing criterion, a reduction in unemployment tax effort resulting from any provision of the State law enacted prior to August 13, 1981, will not be taken into account as a reduction in the State's unemployment tax effort for the purposes of this section.
( b ) *Net decrease in solvency.* For purposes of paragraph (a)(2) of § 606.20, a net decrease in the solvency of the State's unemployment compensation system will have occurred with respect to a taxable year if any action is or was taken (legislative, judicial, or administrative), that is effective during the 12-month period ending on September 30 of such taxable year, which has resulted in or will result in an increase in benefits without at least an equal increase in taxes, or a decrease in taxes without at least an equal decrease in benefits. Notwithstanding the foregoing criterion, a decrease in solvency resulting from any provision of the State law enacted prior to August 13, 1981, will not be taken into account as a reduction in solvency of the State's unemployment compensation system for the purposes of this section.
( c ) *State unemployment tax rate.* For purposes of paragraph (a)(3) of § 606.20, the State unemployment tax rate is defined in § 606.3. If such percentage is not a multiple of 0.1 percent, the percentage shall remain unrounded.
( d ) *State five-year average benefit cost ratio.* The average benefit-cost ratio for the 5 preceding calendar years is the percentage determined by dividing the sum of the benefit-cost ratios for the 5 years by five. If such percentage is not a multiple of 0.1 percent, the percentage shall remain unrounded.
[53 FR 37429, Sept. 26, 1988, as amended at 75 FR 57156, Sept. 17, 2010]
I N THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**KAITLYN JOANNE MANGONE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 233 MAL 2016** 

**P etition for Allowance of Appeal from**  **the Order of the Superior Court**

ORDER

P ER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 28th day of September, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of**

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 15-0322V

Filed: July 6, 2015

Unpublished

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

BEATRICE THOMURE, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

* Influenza (“flu”) vaccine; Shoulder Injury

v. * Related to Vaccine Administration

* (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit

* (“SPU”)

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Lauren Faga, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner.

Alexis Babcock, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

On March 30, 2015, Beatrice Thomure filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq,

2 [the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. The petition alleges that as a result of an influenza (“flu”) 

vaccination on October 1, 2013, petitioner suffered a brachial plexus injury. Petition at 

1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) of the Office of 

Special Masters.

On July 6, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) Report [“Res. Report”], in which 

she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Resp. Report at 3. 

Respondent disagrees that petitioner suffered a vaccine-related “brachial plexus” injury; 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, it will be 

posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2006).

 
however, she has concluded, based on the preponderance of the medical evidence,

that petitioner suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration [“SIRVA”]

and should receive compensation for that injury. Id. Respondent’s concession is 

limited to SIRVA and appropriate sequelae. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation.

s/Denise K. Vowell

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master

2
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Gordon Laschinger, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the Registrant or the Company);  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:  a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedure to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant (including its consolidated subsidiaries), is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b.Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluations;  c.Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reportings; and        5.The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the Audit Committee of the Registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a.All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b.Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Dated:  April 27, 2007
        s/Gordon Laschinger
Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.2203 Definitions.

For purposes of this subpart:

*Accept the recipient as a client for VR services* means that the State VR agency determines that the individual is eligible for VR services and places the individual into an active caseload status for development of an individualized written rehabilitation program.

*Act* means the Social Security Act, as amended.

*Blindness* means “blindness” as defined in section 1614(a)(2) of the Act.

*Commissioner* means the Commissioner of Social Security or the Commissioner's designee.

*Disability* means “disability” as defined in section 1614(a)(3) of the Act.

*Disability or blindness benefits,* as defined for this subpart only, refers to regular SSI benefits under section 1611 of the Act (see § 416.202), special SSI cash benefits under section 1619(a) of the Act (see § 416.261), special SSI eligibility status under section 1619(b) of the Act (see § 416.264), and/or a federally administered State supplementary payment under section 1616 of the Act or section 212(b) of Public Law 93-66 (see § 416.2001), for which an individual is eligible based on disability or blindness, as appropriate.

*Medical recovery* for purposes of this subpart is established when a disabled or blind recipient's eligibility ceases for any medical reason (other than death). The determination of medical recovery is made by the Commissioner in deciding a recipient's continuing eligibility for benefits.

*Place the recipient into an extended evaluation process* means that the State VR agency determines that an extended evaluation of the individual's VR potential is necessary to determine whether the individual is eligible for VR services and places the individual into an extended evaluation status.

*SGA* means substantial gainful activity performed by an individual as defined in §§ 416.971 through 416.975 of this subpart or § 404.1584 of this chapter.

*Special SSI eligibility status* refers to the special status described in §§ 416.264 through 416.269 relating to eligibility for Medicaid.

*State* means any of the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, or the Northern Mariana Islands. It includes the State VR agency.

*Vocational rehabilitation services* has the meaning assigned to it under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

*VR agency* means an agency of the State which has been designated by the State to provide vocational rehabilitation services under title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

*We, us,* and *our* refer to the Social Security Administration (SSA).

[48 FR 6297, Feb. 10, 1983, as amended at 55 FR 8456, Mar. 8, 1990; 55 FR 19423, May 9, 1990; 59 FR 1637, Jan. 12, 1994; 59 FR 11916, Mar. 15, 1994; 61 FR 31026, June 19, 1996; 62 FR 38456, July 18, 1997; 68 FR 40125, July 7, 2003; 83 FR 62460, Dec. 4, 2018]
### §1759a. Repealed. Pub. L. 86–108, ch. IV, §401(l), July 24, 1959, 73 Stat. 255

Section, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. IV, §549, as added July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §1(d), 70 Stat. 565; amended Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §11(e), 71 Stat. 365; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. V, §501(34), 72 Stat. 272, authorized an amount equal to 25 per centum of funds authorized to be appropriated for any fiscal year for purposes of sections 1891 to 1896, 1897, 1898, or 1923 of this title to be continued available for three months beyond end of fiscal year for which appropriated.
November 2021

Day

Shasta 

Inflow

C.F.S.

1

Prev Day

F.C. Par

(Col. 3)

X .95

2

F.C

Param

(Cols. 1+2)

3

.0356*

X Days

12/23 Thru

3/20

4

530,000

Minus

F.C.

Param

(Col 3)

5

Cols

4x5

6

F.C.

Reserv

(1,300,000 - 

Col 6)

7

Minus 

14,943

Per Day

After

3/20

8

Adjusted

F.C.

Reserv

(7-8)

Perm

Storage

90,883

1 5,363 86,339 91,702 3,870,000

2 6,529 87,117 93,646 3,849,000

3 4,535 88,963 93,498 3,827,000

4 7,506 88,824 96,330 3,806,000

5 6,216 91,513 97,729 3,785,000

6 6,257 92,843 99,100 3,763,000

7 4,841 94,145 98,986 3,742,000

8 7,237 94,036 101,273 3,721,000

9 8,807 96,210 105,017 3,700,000

10 8,095 99,766 107,861 3,678,000

11 6,054 102,468 108,522 3,657,000

12 6,322 103,096 109,418 3,636,000

13 4,942 103,947 108,889 3,614,000

14 5,214 103,444 108,658 3,593,000

15 4,556 103,226 107,782 3,572,000

16 5,132 102,392 107,524 3,550,000

17 4,701 102,148 106,849 3,529,000

18 5,149 101,507 106,656 3,508,000

19 4,284 101,323 105,607 3,486,000

20 4,273 100,327 104,600 3,465,000

21 4,161 99,370 103,531 3,444,000

22 4,106 98,354 102,460 3,422,000

23 976 97,337 98,313 3,401,000

24 2,994 93,397 96,391 3,380,000

25 4,034 91,572 95,606 3,359,000

26 4,013 90,826 94,839 3,337,000

27 3,453 90,097 93,550 3,316,000

28 3,191 88,872 92,063 3,295,000

29 3,531 87,460 90,991 3,273,000

30 3,087 86,441 89,528 3,252,000

Comments: 

* LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) ) 

IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE

Historical Archive and Report Database

Lake Shasta Flood Control Requirements

Run Date: 4/19/2023
### §290h–2. Congressional declaration of purposes

#### (a) Purposes of Foundation

In order to enable the people of African countries to develop their potential, fulfill their aspirations, and enjoy better, more productive lives, the purposes of the Foundation shall be—

(1) to strengthen the bonds of friendship and understanding between the people of Africa and the United States;

(2) to support self-help activities at the local level designed to enlarge opportunities for community development;

(3) to stimulate and assist effective and expanding participation of Africans in their development process; and

(4) to encourage the establishment and growth of development institutions which are indigenous to particular countries in Africa and which can respond to the requirements of the poor in those countries.

#### (b) Implementation

The Foundation shall carry out the purposes specified in subsection (a) in cooperation with, and in response to, organizations indigenous to Africa which are representative of the needs and aspirations of the poor in Africa and, in carrying out such purposes, the Foundation shall, to the extent possible, coordinate its development assistance activities with the activities of the United States Government and private, regional, and international organizations.

(Pub. L. 96–533, title V, §504, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3152.)