alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cheryl Pyrch, 7256 Devon Street, Philadelphia, PA 19119. cpyrchksummitpres.net

My name is Cheryl Pyrch. I'm the pastor at Summit Presbyterian Church in Philadelphia, and serve on the Board of the Pennsylvania Chapter of Interfaith Power and Light, people of faith responding to climate change as a moral issue. Thank you for this opportunity to testify in support of the Clean Power Plan.

At IPL and in my congregation we're concerned about climate change for the reasons of justice, compassion and gratitude for God's creation that others have spoken about.

But I'd like to tell a parable about timing. It's a true story.

Our church was built over 100 years ago. It's a massive structure made from Wissahickon Schist, built for a congregation of a thousand; for decades Summit has been a congregation of one to two hundred. The leadership has cared for the building responsibly, with limited resources, and dozens of community groups use it. But over the years, certain projects had to be deferred. One of them was the tower. For a while, folks had noticed signs of trouble: small cracks, a disturbing bulge. Six years ago the trustees acted. They called in a top drawer engineering firm. The engineers proposed a$56,000 solution, and encouraged us to begin sooner rather than later, although there was no immediate danger. So we got into gear, raised four hundred thousand dollars in a capital campaign, and got quotes from different contractors. But just before the work was to begin, a large stone fell from the tower in the middle of the night. A much smaller stone fell on the head of a deacon who was peering at one of the new cracks. On closer inspection, we realized that in the two years it had taken to get ready, the situation had changed. Two harsh winters, two freeze and thaw cycles, had pushed the tower to a tipping point, and it was now beginning to collapse. So the engineers came up with a new plan, and $180,000 later we thought we were done. But almost immediately an ominous crack appeared in a different part of the tower. More engineers, another plan, the assurance that taking it down would be just as expensive, and $320,000 later (total), our tower is now secure. You can worship safely at Summit. But the survival of the tower came at a much greater cost than if we had known, or been able, to act earlier. Hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent that could have been used for other projects or ministries.

After this up close and personal experience with tipping points, we hear the scientists when they warn us of tipping points in the climate. We hear them when they tell of cascading extinctions and possible eco-system collapse. We understand the fierce urgency of now, in both a moral and practical sense. I can't speak for everyone in the congregation, but I'm glad the EPA is acting, even in the face of heated political opposition. There are costs to limiting carbon emissions, and those who face loss in the transition to a new economy must be supported. But the costs of delay are so much greater. And the stakes are so much higher than with our tower.

You are doing holy work! Thank you.
Exhibit 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 159

 149

 158

 141

 147

 156

 156

 157

 162

 163

 151

 152

 165

 145

 152

 149

 144

 142

 138

 137

 139

 137

 139

 139

 140

 140

 135

 138

 143

 146

 145

 142

 126

 124

 124

 139

 149

 153

 150

 149

 151

 138

 146

 145

 144

 144

 141

 141

 138

 133

 134

 136

 133

 134

 136

 129

 133

 133

 135

 136

 140

 140

 147

 137

 140

 136

 143

 152

 155

 154

 155

 155

 149

 149

 147

 145

 145

 144

 142

 140

 135

 135

 138

 135

 137

 137

 137

 138

 134

 136

 139

 144

 142

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 12, 2002

HIGH LOW MEAN

 56.3

 56.5

 56.3

 55.0

 53.6

 53.7

 53.1

 53.3

 55.0

 54.4

 53.8

 52.9

 52.8

 51.1

 50.0

 49.1

 48.7

 48.8

 49.2

 49.1

 49.7

 49.6

 49.0

 48.9

 49.2

 49.8

 50.5

 49.8

 49.5

 48.6

 48.6

 55.3

 56.2

 54.9

 53.6

 52.9

 53.0

 52.5

 52.0

 53.3

 53.0

 52.9

 52.4

 51.3

 49.3

 48.0

 47.3

 46.9

 46.6

 46.9

 46.7

 47.2

 47.6

 46.6

 46.2

 46.5

 48.7

 48.4

 47.8

 48.0

 46.1

 45.7

 55.8

 56.4

 55.4

 54.1

 53.3

 53.3

 52.8

 52.7

 54.0

 53.7

 53.2

 52.6

 52.2

 50.1

 49.0

 48.3

 47.9

 47.8

 48.1

 48.0

 48.5

 48.7

 47.9

 47.6

 48.1

 49.1

 49.4

 48.9

 48.8

 47.4

 47.3

HIGH LOW MEAN

 7.8

 7.6

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 8.4

 8.6

 8.7

 8.6

 8.5

 8.7

 8.8

 9.0

 9.2

 9.5

 9.7

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.9

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.0

 9.7

 9.6

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 7.2

 7.3

 7.6

 7.1

 7.9

 8.2

 8.4

 8.5

 8.2

 8.2

 8.4

 8.6

 8.8

 9.0

 9.2

 9.3

 9.6

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.6

 9.8

 9.7

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.4

 9.7

 7.6

 7.5

 7.9

 7.7

 8.1

 8.3

 8.5

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.6

 8.7

 8.9

 9.1

 9.4

 9.6

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.8

 9.7

 9.6

 9.8

 10.0

 9.9

 9.5

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.7

 9.9

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
Exhibit 31.4


CERTIFICATION


I, David B. Rottino, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Linn Energy, Inc.; and


2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date:  April 18, 2018


/s/  David B. RottinoDavid B. RottinoExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# sample list

U.S. Geological Survey	Data Series 895 	 du Bray and others

Page &P	&F
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Zhang Fan, Vice President of Accounting/ Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date:  August 29, 2013





/s/ Fan ZhangFan ZhangVice President of Accounting /Acting Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of St. Lawrence Life Association, Petitioner, against Joseph D. McGoldrick, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Townley and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote to annul the determination.
(No. 6707

#### St. Joseph Hospital, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 5, 1972.*

St. Joseph Hospital, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
#### § 422.906 Periodic request for review of ban decision.

You may request review of our ban decision every three years. The three-year cycle to request review will begin on the date we issued notice of the ban, or if you appealed, the date of our appeal decision. You must submit your request for review of a ban decision in writing to the address identified in the original notice of the ban. Your request for review should identify your name, address, Social Security number, and office that issued the notice of the ban. Your request should clearly state why we should lift the ban and provide relevant documentation that supports removal of the restriction, including medical documentation, applicable psychiatric evaluations, work history, and any criminal record. You must prove by a preponderance of the evidence (meaning that it is more likely than not) that you no longer pose a threat to the safety of our personnel or visitors or the operational effectiveness of the agency. We will notify you of our decision in writing.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdaptive Variable Bias Magnetic Bearing ControlMost magnetic bearing control schemes use a bias current with a superimposed control current to linearize the relationship between the control current and the force it delivers. With the existence of the bias current, even in no load conditions, there is always some power consumption. In aerospace applications, power consumption becomes an important concern. In response to this concern, an alternative magnetic bearing control method, called Adaptive Variable Bias Control (AVBC), has been developed and its performance examined. The AVBC operates primarily as a proportional-derivative controller with a relatively slow, bias current dependent, time-varying gain. The AVBC is shown to reduce electrical power loss, be nominally stable, and provide control performance similar to conventional bias control. Analytical, computer simulation, and experimental results are presented in this paper.Document ID19980197314Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsJohnson, Dexter*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Brown, Gerald V.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Inman, Daniel J.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ. Blacksburg, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1998Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberE-11127NASA/TM-1998-206975NAS 1.15:206975Meeting InformationMeeting: 1998 American Controls ConferenceLocation: Philadelphia, PACountry: United StatesStart Date: June 24, 1998End Date: June 26, 1998Sponsors:American Automatic Control CouncilFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 523-22-13Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980197314.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 404.820 Filing a request for correction of the record of your earnings. ( a ) *When to file a request for correction.* You or your survivor must file a request for correction of the record of your earnings within the time limit for the year being questioned unless one of the exceptions in § 404.822 applies.
( b ) *Contents of a request.* ( 1 ) A request for correction of an earnings record must be in writing and must state that the record is incorrect.
( 2 ) A request must be signed by you or your survivor or by a person who may sign an application for benefits for you or for your survivor as described in § 404.612.
( 3 ) A request should state the period being questioned.
( 4 ) A request should describe, or have attached to it, any available evidence which shows that the record of earnings is incorrect.
( c ) *Where to file a request.* A request may be filed with an SSA employee at one of our offices or with an SSA employee who is authorized to receive a request at a place other than one of our offices. A request may be filed with the Veterans Administration Regional Office in the Philippines or with any U.S. Foreign Service Office.
( d ) *When a request is considered filed.* A request is considered filed on the day it is received by any of our offices, by an authorized SSA employee, by the Veterans Administration Regional Office in the Philippines, or by any U.S. Foreign Service Office. If using the date we receive a mailed request disadvantages the requester, we will use the date the request was mailed to us as shown by a U.S. postmark. If the postmark is unreadable or there is no postmark, we will consider other evidence of the date when the request was mailed.
( e ) *Withdrawal of a request for correction.* A request for correction of SSA records of your earnings may be withdrawn as described in § 404.640.
( f ) *Cancellation of a request to withdraw.* A request to withdraw a request for correction of SSA records of your earnings may be cancelled as described in § 404.641.
( g ) *Determinations on requests.* When we receive a request described in this section, we will make a determination to grant or deny the request. If we deny the request, this determination may be appealed under the provisions of subpart J of this part.
§ 663.820 What are the eligibility requirements for adults to receive needs-related payments? Adults must: ( a ) Be unemployed,
( b ) Not qualify for, or have ceased qualifying for, unemployment compensation; and
( c ) Be enrolled in a program of training services under WIA section 134(d)(4).
### §5302. Findings

The Congress finds that—

(1) the macroeconomic policies, including the exchange rate policies, of the leading industrialized nations require improved coordination and are not consistent with long-term economic growth and financial stability;

(2) currency values have a major role in determining the patterns of production and trade in the world economy;

(3) the rise in the value of the dollar in the early 1980's contributed substantially to our current trade deficit;

(4) exchange rates among major trading nations have become increasingly volatile and a pattern of exchange rates has at times developed which contribute to substantial and persistent imbalances in the flow of goods and services between nations, imposing serious strains on the world trading system and frustrating both business and government planning;

(5) capital flows between nations have become very large compared to trade flows, respond at times quickly and dramatically to policy and economic changes, and, for these reasons, contribute significantly to uncertainty in financial markets, the volatility of exchange rates, and the development of exchange rates which produce imbalances in the flow of goods and services between nations;

(6) policy initiatives by some major trading nations that manipulate the value of their currencies in relation to the United States dollar to gain competitive advantage continue to create serious competitive problems for United States industries;

(7) a more stable exchange rate for the dollar at a level consistent with a more appropriate and sustainable balance in the United States current account should be a major focus of national economic policy;

(8) procedures for improving the coordination of macroeconomic policy need to be strengthened considerably; and

(9) under appropriate circumstances, intervention by the United States in foreign exchange markets as part of a coordinated international strategic intervention effort could produce more orderly adjustment of foreign exchange markets and, in combination with necessary macroeconomic policy changes, assist adjustment toward a more appropriate and sustainable balance in current accounts.

(Pub. L. 100–418, title III, §3002, Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1372.)
June 1, 2015

Mr. Matt Anderson

Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548

Dear Mr. Anderson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t process your 

request, gives you some important information about how we have handled similar requests, 

and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your May 11, 2015, exemption request into the public docket No. FAA-2015-

1309, but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t 

comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 Your full mailing address.

 The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would 

provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an 

exemption.

 Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 The specific reasons you need to exercise the privileges of your exemption outside the 

United States, if applicable.

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will close the docket 

without further contact.
2

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty

Manager, Aircraft and Airports Rules Division

Enclosure

§ 11.81
3

Project No.: AXX-xx-xxx-E

Project Officer: _______________

ARM-207:FShaver:xx/xx/xx:Doc#xxxx

ARM-1/200/207:Program Office [or specific OPR routing symbol]

[Insert Stylewriter Score Here]

[INSERT ENVELOPE ADDRESS HERE]
#### § 641.130 What is the scope of this part?

The regulations in this part address the requirements that apply to the SCSEP. More detailed policies and procedures are contained in administrative guidelines issued by the Department. Throughout this part, phrases such as, “according to instructions (procedures) issued by the Department” or “additional guidance will be provided through administrative issuance” refer to the documents issued under the Secretary's authority to administer the SCSEP, such as Training and Employment Guidance Letters (TEGLs), Training and Employment Notices (TENs), previously issued SCSEP Older Worker Bulletins that are still in effect, technical assistance guides, and other SCSEP guidance.
§ 408.1235 How does the State transfer funds to SSA to administer its recognition payment program? ( a ) *Payment transfer and adjustment.* ( 1 ) Any State that has entered into an agreement with SSA which provides for Federal administration of such State's recognition payments will transfer to SSA: ( i ) An amount of funds equal to SSA's estimate of State recognition payments for any month which will be made by SSA on behalf of such State; and
( ii ) An amount of funds equal to SSA's estimate of administration fees for any such month determined in the manner described in § 408.1210(b).
( 3 ) In order for SSA to make State recognition payments on behalf of a State for any month as provided by the agreement, the estimated amount of State funds referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section together with the estimated amount of administration fees referred to in paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, for that month, must be on deposit with SSA on the State recognition payment transfer date, which is: ( i ) the business day preceding the date that the Commissioner pays such monthly recognition payments; or
( ii ) with respect to such monthly payments paid for the month that is the last month of the State's fiscal year, the fifth business day following such date.
( b ) *Accounting of State funds.* ( 1 ) As soon as feasible after the end of each calendar month, SSA will provide the State with a statement showing, cumulatively, the total amounts paid by SSA on behalf of the State during the current Federal fiscal year; the fees charged by SSA to administer such recognition payments; the State's total liability; and the end-of-month balance of the State's cash on deposit with SSA.
( 2 ) SSA will provide the State with an accounting of State funds received as State recognition payments and administration fees within three calendar months following the termination of an agreement under § 408.1210(d).
( 3 ) Adjustments will be made because of State funds due and payable or amounts of State funds recovered for calendar months for which the agreement was in effect. Interest will be incurred by SSA and the States with respect to the adjustment and accounting of State recognition payments funds in accordance with applicable laws and regulations of the United States Department of the Treasury.
( c ) *State audit.* Any State entering into an agreement with SSA which provides for Federal administration of the State's recognition payments has the right to an audit (at State expense) of the payments made by SSA on behalf of such State. The Commissioner and the State shall mutually agree upon a satisfactory audit arrangement to verify that recognition payments paid by SSA on behalf of the State were made in accordance with the terms of the administration agreement under § 408.1205. Audit findings will be resolved in accordance with the provisions of the State's agreement with SSA.
§ 667.274 What health and safety standards apply to the working conditions of participants in activities under title I of WIA? ( a ) Health and safety standards established under Federal and State law otherwise applicable to working conditions of employees are equally applicable to working conditions of participants engaged in programs and activities under Title I of WIA.
( b ) ( 1 ) To the extent that a State workers' compensation law applies, workers' compensation must be provided to participants in programs and activities under Title I of WIA on the same basis as the compensation is provided to other individuals in the State in similar employment.
( 2 ) If a State workers' compensation law applies to a participant in work experience, workers' compensation benefits must be available for injuries suffered by the participant in such work experience. If a State workers' compensation law does not apply to a participant in work experience, insurance coverage must be secured for injuries suffered by the participant in the course of such work experience.
(No. 6278

#### Cargill, Incorporated, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September*8, *1972.*

Cargill, Incorporated, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
(No. 74-CC-706

#### Tazewell Publishing Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed June 27, 1974.*

Tazewell Publishing Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*508Per Curiam.