alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 418.1105 What is the threshold? ( a ) The threshold is a level of modified adjusted gross income above which the beneficiary will have to pay the income-related monthly adjustment amount.
( b ) From January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2019, the modified adjusted gross income threshold is $170,000 for individuals with a Federal income tax filing status of married filing jointly. The threshold is $85,000 for individuals with any other filing status.
( c ) Starting on January 1, 2020, the threshold amounts will resume adjustment for inflation as required by section 1839(i)(5) of the Act. In each year thereafter, CMS will set all modified adjusted gross income threshold amounts for the following year by increasing the preceding year's threshold amounts by any percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index rounded to the nearest $1,000. CMS will publish the amounts in the Federal Register in September of each year. Published threshold amounts will be effective January 1 of the next calendar year, for the full calendar year.
[71 FR 62931, Oct. 27, 2006, as amended at 78 FR 57259, Sept. 18, 2013]
(May 10, 1948.)

#### In the Matter of Preferred Accident Insurance Company of New York et al., Respondents. Jos. L. Roesch, Appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

When the policyholders were sued because of liability for automobile accidents or other form of casualty, they delivered the summonses which had been served upon them to their insurance carriers, calling upon the carriers to provide for the defense of the actions in accordance with the obligation to do so contained in the policies. The policyholders thereby impliedly authorized the insurance companies to act as their agents in obtaining a lawyer or lawyers for them as attorney or attorneys of record in the litigations. Such implied authority included the power to change lawyers for the policyholders, and, in the absence of revocation of the authority to retain or change their attorneys, the respondent insurance companies were empowered to maintain legal proceedings for removal and substitution of attorneys without additional formal or specific consent of the policyholders to the substitution.

It is expressly conceded that termination of the retainer was due to managerial reorganization and does not in any way reflect upon the ability, honesty and reputation of the attorney in question.

On reargument Special Term modified and enlarged the scope of its original order so as to make it applicable to actions pending in all courts where the appellant appeared as attorney of record. That order should be affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. In view of such affirmance, the appeal from the original order under the circumstances here presented is dismissed as academic.

Shientag, J.

(dissenting). I dissent and vote to modify the order entered July 2, 1947. While I concur in the *Per Curiam*opinion as far as it goes, I believe that the order of substitution should contain a provision requiring that a copy thereof be sent by mail within a specified time to all of the insured. The order entered July 2, 1947, should be modified to contain such a requirement.

Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore and Van Voorhis, JJ., concur in *Per Curiam*opinion; Shientag, J., dissents and votes to modify with memorandum.

Order entered July 2, 1947, affirmed with $20 costs and disbursements. Appeal from order entered June 26, 1947, unanimously dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,011.66

 1,011.52

 1,011.22

 1,011.07

 1,010.91

 1,010.74

 1,010.62

 1,010.57

 1,010.40

 1,010.31

 1,010.15

 1,010.04

 1,009.96

 1,009.92

 1,009.86

 1,009.79

 1,009.70

 1,009.72

 1,009.92

 1,010.43

 1,010.76

 1,011.16

 1,011.58

 1,011.85

 1,011.96

 1,012.13

 1,012.26

 1,012.27

 1,012.33

 1,012.35

 1,012.41

 3,090.0

 3,086.7

 3,079.8

 3,076.3

 3,072.7

 3,068.8

 3,066.0

 3,064.8

 3,060.9

 3,058.9

 3,055.2

 3,052.7

 3,050.8

 3,049.9

 3,048.6

 3,047.0

 3,044.9

 3,045.4

 3,049.9

 3,061.6

 3,069.2

 3,078.4

 3,088.1

 3,094.4

 3,096.9

 3,100.8

 3,103.9

 3,104.1

 3,105.5

 3,105.9

 3,107.3

STORAGE

-4.6

-3.2

-6.9

-3.5

-3.7

-3.9

-2.8

-1.1

-3.9

-2.1

-3.7

-2.5

-1.8

-0.9

-1.4

-1.6

-2.1

+0.5

+4.6

+11.7

+7.6

+9.2

+9.7

+6.2

+2.5

+3.9

+3.0

+0.2

+1.4

+0.5

+1.4

CHANGE

 2,317

 3,053

 1,585

 3,479

 3,367

 3,422

 3,310

 4,012

 2,999

 3,656

 3,152

 3,546

 3,822

 3,804

 3,581

 3,455

 3,376

 4,400

 6,468

 9,140

 7,412

 8,302

 8,730

 6,772

 4,948

 6,083

 5,491

 3,739

 4,489

 4,195

 4,528

INFLOW

 4,578

 4,615

 5,051

 5,178

 5,178

 5,132

 4,639

 4,517

 4,833

 4,664

 4,938

 4,719

 4,726

 4,225

 4,185

 4,242

 4,400

 4,143

 4,096

 3,204

 3,556

 3,557

 3,826

 3,588

 3,647

 4,062

 3,929

 3,540

 3,644

 3,900

 3,785

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 218

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 68

 68

 27

 47

 47

 41

 61

 74

 135

 34

 67

 101

 20

 40

 88

 20

 13

 27

 67

 34

 34

 102

 14

 41

 20

 34

 41

 82

 143

 61

 41

C.F.S.

 .10

 .10

 .04

 .07

 .07

 .06

 .09

 .11

 .20

 .05

 .10

 .15

 .03

 .06

 .13

 .03

 .02

 .04

 .10

 .05

 .05

 .15

 .02

 .06

 .03

 .05

 .06

 .12

 .21

 .09

 .06

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .85

 1.77

 2.25

 .02

 2.13

 .00

 .31

 .25

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2012 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 9, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +12.7 140,633 132,297 0 218 1,692 2.50 7.60

ACRE-FEET +12,700 278,946 262,411 0 432 3,356

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 262,411

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 432

 262,843

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 7.60

JULY 1, 2011 16.07

 3,094.6

Table 3
Exhibit 23.7

                                  ERNST & YOUNG

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



         We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" and
to the use of our report dated March 22, 1999, with respect to the  consolidated
financial statements of Fitch plc included in the Report of Foreign Issuer (Form
6-K) of Cordiant  Communications  Group plc dated  September 25, 2000 filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission  and  incorporated  by reference in the
Registration   Statement   (Form  F-3)  and  related   Prospectus   of  Cordiant
Communications  Group plc for the  registration  of  73,412,623  of its Ordinary
Shares, 50p par value.


ERNST & YOUNG



London, England

September 25, 2000
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.4

                             COMSHARE, INCORPORATED

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
constitutes and appoints Dennis G. Ganster, Kathryn A. Jehle and Michael S.
Khoury, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution, and resubstitution for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign a certain Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to be filed by Comshare, Incorporated relating to the Comshare,
Incorporated Employee Stock Purchase Plan and any and all amendments thereto,
and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto
such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done
in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that such
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Dated: 12-14, 1999                           /s/ Geoffrey B. Bloom
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Geoffrey B. Bloom, Director
### §5425. Use of Polish currency generated by agricultural assistance

#### (a) Additional assistance for Poland

A portion of the agricultural commodities described in subsection (c) may be made available and sold or bartered in Poland to generate local currencies to be used—

(1) to complement the assistance for Poland authorized by sections 5413(b), 5421, and 5423 of this title, and

(2) to support the activities of the joint commission established pursuant to section 2226 of the American Aid to Poland Act of 1988 (7 U.S.C. 1431 note),

notwithstanding section 1431(b)(7) of title 7 or any other provision of law.

#### (b) Emphasis on agricultural development

The uses of local currencies generated under this section should emphasize the development of agricultural infrastructure, agriculture-related training, and other aspects of agricultural development in Poland.

#### (c) Commodities subject to requirements

Subsection (a) applies with respect to agricultural commodities made available for Poland for fiscal years 1990, 1991, and 1992 under section 1431(b) of title 7, the Food for Peace Act (7 U.S.C. 1691 and following), and section 1736o of title 7.

#### (d) Other uses not precluded

The uses of agricultural commodities and local currencies specified in subsection (a) are in addition to other uses authorized by law.

(Pub. L. 101–179, title II, §205, Nov. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 1310; Pub. L. 110–246, title III, §3001(b)(1)(A), (2)(U), June 18, 2008, 122 Stat. 1820, 1821.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

Section 2226 of the American Aid to Poland Act of 1988, referred to in subsec. (a)(2), is section 2226 of Pub. L. 100–418, which is set out as a note under section 1431 of Title 7, Agriculture.

The Food for Peace Act, referred to in subsec. (c), is act July 10, 1954, ch. 469, 68 Stat. 454, which is classified generally to chapter 41 (§1691 et seq.) of Title 7. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 1691 of Title 7 and Tables.

#### Amendments

2008—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 110–246 substituted "Food for Peace Act" for "Agricultural Trade Development and Assistance Act of 1954".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 2008 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, see section 4(b) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of Title 7, Agriculture.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4311 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from modifying or amending the 

standards and regulations governing the substantiation of charitable contributions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. SALMON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from modifying 

or amending the standards and regulations governing 

the substantiation of charitable contributions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Charitable 

5 Contributions Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4311 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF IRS MODIFICATION OF STAND2 ARDS AND REGULATIONS FOR SUBSTAN3 TIATION OF CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The definitions and regulations in 

5 effect on January 1, 2015, under section 170(f)(8) of the 

6 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to the substan7 tiation of charitable contributions in excess of $250) shall 

8 apply on and after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

9 (b) PROHIBITION OF ANY MODIFICATION.—The Sec10 retary of the Treasury shall not issue, revise, or finalize 

11 any regulation (including the proposed regulations pub12 lished in the Federal Register on September 17, 2015 (80 

13 Fed. Reg. 55802)), revenue ruling, or other guidance not 

14 limited to a particular taxpayer relating to the definitions 

15 and regulations specified in subsection (a). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Concrete Delivery Company, Inc., et al., Respondents, against Anthony S. Strychalski et al., Constituting the Board of Assessors of the City of Dunkirk, et al., Appellants.

Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1




Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)




In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward
H. Bersoff, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      March 24, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Edward H.
  BersoffEdward
      H. Bersoff
                Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 2,361

 4,959

 3,634

 3,404

 2,987

 3,070

 4,471

 7,099

 8,041

 4,835

 4,252

 4,056

 3,626

 5,188

 7,089

 5,228

 4,686

 4,136

 5,343

 3,952

 4,020

 3,667

 3,109

 3,704

 3,868

 4,091

 4,691

 3,694

 5,003

 4,438

 70,958

 69,653

 70,881

 70,790

 70,484

 69,797

 69,224

 70,010

 73,254

 77,230

 77,962

 78,103

 78,051

 77,593

 78,642

 81,445

 82,339

 82,674

 82,469

 83,422

 83,005

 82,674

 82,024

 80,876

 80,351

 80,008

 79,894

 80,356

 79,847

 80,608

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: December 23, 2003

 73,319

 74,612

 74,515

 74,194

 73,471

 72,867

 73,695

 77,109

 81,295

 82,065

 82,214

 82,159

 81,677

 82,781

 85,731

 86,673

 87,025

 86,810

 87,812

 87,374

 87,025

 86,341

 85,133

 84,580

 84,219

 84,099

 84,585

 84,050

 84,850

 85,046

 3,870,000

 3,849,000

 3,827,000

 3,806,000

 3,785,000

 3,763,000

 3,742,000

 3,721,000

 3,700,000

 3,678,000

 3,657,000

 3,636,000

 3,614,000

 3,593,000

 3,572,000

 3,550,000

 3,529,000

 3,508,000

 3,486,000

 3,465,000

 3,444,000

 3,422,000

 3,401,000

 3,380,000

 3,359,000

 3,337,000

 3,316,000

 3,295,000

 3,273,000

 3,252,000

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 74,693
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report of Robcor  Properties,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael Heitz,  acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive  Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                       /s/ Michael Heitz
                       ---------------------------
                       Michael Heitz
                       CEO and CFO


                                       34
Exhibit10.13

 SUMMARY OF OFFER LETTER BETWEEN THECOMPANY AND MICHAEL E. CROW 

The Companyextended an offer letter to Michael E. Crow, our Senior Vice President— Finance and Chief Accounting Officer, in April  2003,which was subsequently amended in March  2004. Pursuant to theoffer letter, Mr.  Crow is an at-will employee, is paid a basesalary and is eligible to receive discretionary bonuses as the Board ofDirectors may determine. Mr.  Crow may also participate inbenefit plans generally available to our executiveemployees.

In the event that Mr.  Crow’semployment is terminated by the Company for a reason other than cause(as defined in the offer letter), Mr.  Crow will be entitled tohis base salary for one year, to be paid in accordance with theCompany's standard payroll practices at the time. If Mr.Crow finds other employment during that one-year severance period,however, the amount of severance pay will be reduced by the amount ofhis new salary (and any deferred compensation) earned from the newemployment during the severance period. Mr.  Crow is also subjectto confidentiality and non-competitioncovenants.

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Southern Sauce Company Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      John Vogel, President & Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and
      for
      the periods presented in the Report.




Date:
                May 1, 2008
            By:
                /s/
            John VogelName:
            John VogelTitle:
            Chief Executive Officer, President, Directorand Principal Accounting Officer
#### § 609.24 Reconsideration of Federal findings.

On receipt of a request for reconsideration of Federal findings from a State agency, the Federal agency shall consider the initial information supplied in connection with such request and shall review its findings. The Federal agency shall correct any errors or omissions in its findings and shall affirm, modify, or reverse any or all of its findings in writing. The Federal agency promptly shall forward its reconsidered findings to the requesting authority. The Federal agency shall, if possible, respond within four workdays after the receipt of a request under this section.
Exhibit 10.17


 


First Amendment to Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement


 


This First Amendment to Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement (this “First Amendment”) is entered into as of this 29th day of October 2018 and is effective
as of May 1, 2018, by and between Hilla Eisenberg, an individual residing in Haifa, Israel (the “Executive”),
and ORAMED Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel, with an address at Hi-Tech Park 2/4 Givat
Ram, Jerusalem, Israel 91390 (the “Company”).


 


WHEREAS, the
Company and the Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2017 (the “Original
Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Company
and the Executive desire to amend the terms and conditions of the Original Agreement to increase the Executive’s salary.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1. In
Section 2.1(a) - Salary of the Original Agreement, the following paragraph is hereby added:


 


As of May 1, 2018, the Executive
shall be entitled to a gross monthly salary of NIS 35,700 (the “Salary”).


 


2. Except for the
changes and/or additions stated herein, all the other terms of the Original Agreement shall remain valid and bind the parties
without any change. In the case of a contradiction between the provisions of this First Amendment and the provisions of the
Original Agreement, the provisions of this First Amendment shall prevail. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
the term “Agreement” as used in the Original Agreement shall be deemed to be the Original Agreement as amended by
this First Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed
this First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as of October 29, 2018.


 


	 	Oramed Ltd.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Nadav Kidron
	 	Nadav Kidron, CEO
	 	 
	 	/s/ Hilla Eisenberg
	 	Hilla Eisenberg