alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 498.206 Prehearing conferences. ( a ) The ALJ will schedule at least one prehearing conference, and may schedule additional prehearing conferences as appropriate, upon reasonable notice to the parties.
( b ) The ALJ may use prehearing conferences to address the following: ( 1 ) Simplification of the issues;
( 2 ) The necessity or desirability of amendments to the pleadings, including the need for a more definite statement;
( 3 ) Stipulations and admissions of fact as to the contents and authenticity of documents and deadlines for challenges, if any, to the authenticity of documents;
( 4 ) Whether the parties can agree to submission of the case on a stipulated record;
( 5 ) Whether a party chooses to waive appearance at a hearing and to submit only documentary evidence (subject to the objection of other parties) and written argument;
( 6 ) Limitation of the number of witnesses;
( 7 ) The time and place for the hearing and dates for the exchange of witness lists and of proposed exhibits;
( 8 ) Discovery of documents as permitted by this part;
( 9 ) Such other matters as may tend to encourage the fair, just, and expeditious disposition of the proceedings; and
( 10 ) Potential settlement of the case.
( c ) The ALJ shall issue an order containing the matters agreed upon by the parties or ordered by the ALJ at a prehearing conference.
[61 FR 65469, Dec. 13, 1996]
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the amended Annual Report of Linn Energy, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kolja Rockov, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  November 5, 2013/s/  Kolja RockovKolja RockovExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 418.3415 How do we determine countable resources? ( a ) *General rule.* Your countable resources are determined as of the first moment of the month for which we determine your eligibility based on your application for a subsidy or for which we redetermine your eligibility for a subsidy. A resource determination is based on what assets you (and your living-with spouse, if any) have, what their values are, and whether they are excluded as of the first moment of the month. We will use this amount as your countable resources at the point when we determine your eligibility for the subsidy unless you report to us that the value of your resources has changed as described in § 418.3120.
( b ) *Equity value.* Resources, other than cash, are evaluated according to your (and your spouse's, if any) equity in the resources. For purposes of this subpart, the equity value of an item is defined as the price for which that item, minus any encumbrances, can reasonably be expected to sell on the open market in the particular geographic area involved.
( c ) *Relationship of income to resources.* Cash you receive during a month is evaluated under the rules for counting income during the month of receipt. If you retain the cash until the first moment of the following month, the cash is countable as a resource unless it is otherwise excludable.
§ 663.220 Who may receive intensive services? There are two categories of adults and dislocated workers who may receive intensive services: ( a ) Adults and dislocated workers who are unemployed, have received at least one core service and are unable to obtain employment through core services, and are determined by a One-Stop operator to be in need of more intensive services to obtain employment; and
( b ) Adults and dislocated workers who are employed, have received at least one core service, and are determined by a One-Stop operator to be in need of intensive services to obtain or retain employment that leads to self-sufficiency, as described in § 663.230.
§ 661.230 What are the requirements for modification of the State Workforce Investment Plan? ( a ) The State may submit a modification of its workforce investment plan at any time during the five-year life of the plan.
( b ) Modifications are required when: ( 1 ) Changes in Federal or State law or policy substantially change the assumptions upon which the plan is based.
( 2 ) There are changes in the Statewide vision, strategies, policies, performance indicators, the methodology used to determine local allocation of funds, reorganizations which change the working relationship with system employees, changes in organizational responsibilities, changes to the membership structure of the State Board or alternative entity and similar substantial changes to the State's workforce investment system.
( 3 ) The State has failed to meet performance goals, and must adjust service strategies.
( c ) Modifications are required in accordance with the Wagner-Peyser provisions at 20 CFR 652.212.
( d ) Modifications to the State Plan are subject to the same public review and comment requirements that apply to the development of the original State Plan.
( e ) State Plan modifications will be approved by the Secretary based on the approval standard applicable to the original State Plan under § 661.220(e).
### §4603. United States Institute of Peace

#### (a) Establishment

There is hereby established the United States Institute of Peace.

#### (b) Status; restrictions

The Institute is an independent nonprofit corporation and an organization described in section 170(c)(2)(B) of title 26. The Institute does not have the power to issue any shares of stock or to declare or pay any dividends.

#### (c) Establishment and functions of an "Endowment of the United States Institute for Peace"

As determined by the Board, the Institute may establish, under the laws of the District of Columbia, a legal entity which is capable of receiving, holding, and investing public funds for purposes in furtherance of the Institute under this chapter. The Institute may designate such legal entity as the "Endowment of the United States Institute for Peace".

#### (d) Liability for acts within scope of authority

The Institute is liable for the acts of its directors, officers, employees, and agents when acting within the scope of their authority.

#### (e) Trade name and trademark rights; vested rights protected; condition for use of Federal identity

(1) The Institute has the sole and exclusive right to use and to allow or refuse others the use of the terms "United States Institute of Peace", "Jennings Randolph Program for International Peace", "Spark M. Matsunaga Medal of Peace", and "Endowment of the United States Institute of Peace" and the use of any official United States Institute of Peace emblem, badge, seal, and other mark of recognition or any colorable simulation thereof. No powers or privileges hereby granted shall interfere or conflict with established or vested rights secured as of September 1, 1981.

(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the Institute may use "United States" or "U.S." or any other reference to the United States Government or Nation in its title or in its corporate seal, emblem, badge, or other mark of recognition or colorable simulation thereof in any fiscal year only if there is an authorization of appropriations for the Institute for such fiscal year provided by law.

(Pub. L. 98–525, title XVII, §1704, Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2651; Pub. L. 99–514, §2, Oct. 22, 1986, 100 Stat. 2095; Pub. L. 101–520, title III, §319(b), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2285.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1990—Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 101–520 inserted reference to Spark M. Matsunaga Medal of Peace.

1986—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted "Internal Revenue Code of 1986" for "Internal Revenue Code of 1954", which for purposes of codification was translated as "title 26" thus requiring no change in text.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of TWC HoldingLLC (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Brian A. Lutes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  March 31, 2006

 

 
|   | By:                     | /s/ Brian A. Lutes |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | Brian A. Lutes          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### §§ 365.161-365.169 [Reserved]
STORAGE - A.F. CHANGE SHASTA NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV

IRON

CANYON PIT 6 PIT 7

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S

RIVER 

C.F.S

NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 35,715 18,963 7,458 10,606 31,069 103,811 297 150 4,941 5,091 4,830.9

2 35,163 18,646 7,465 12,463 29,779 103,516 -295 -149 5,208 5,059 4,840.9

Totals 2 10,150

Acre - Feet 20,133

* October 1, 2023 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At Shasta Dam

Run Date: 6/3/2024

June 2024
#### Leo Smith, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. General Schuyler Fire Insurance Company et al., Appellants.

Present—Crosby, P. J., Cur gingham, Taylor, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,716
<ALLOWANCES>                                       369
<INVENTORY>                                      2,153
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,109
<PP&E>                                           1,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                     823
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,670
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,089
<BONDS>                                          1,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,336
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,491)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,670
<SALES>                                          5,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,740
<CGS>                                            5,284
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 185
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,427)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,427)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
<FN>
<F1>Bad debt expense of 0 is included in the 338 reported as General and
Administrative expenses.
</FN>


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 615

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 615 appear at 81 FR 57778, Aug. 24, 2016.

#### § 615.3 Effective period of the program.

An Extended Benefit Program conforming with EUCA and this part shall be a requirement for a State law effective on and after January 1, 1972, pursuant to section 3304(a)(11) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, (26 U.S.C. 3304(a)(11)). Continuation of the program by a State in conformity and substantial compliance with EUCA and this part, throughout any 12-month period ending on October 31 of a year subsequent to 1972, shall be a condition of the certification of the State with respect to such 12-month period under section 3304(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 3304(c)). Conformity with EUCA and this part in the payment of regular compensation, regular extended compensation, and high unemployment extended compensation (if State law so provides) to any individual is a continuing requirement, applicable to every week as a condition of a State's entitlement to payment for any compensation as provided in EUCA and this part.

[53 FR 27937, July 25, 1988, as amended at 81 FR 57781, Aug. 24, 2016]
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Cretaceous and early Tertiary depositional and tectonic 
history of the Livingston area, southwestern Montana

#### Professional Paper 526-C

Tweet


#### Links

- Document: **Document**                                 
  (22046 pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                 
    (5290 pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                 
    (2548 pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                 
    (14585 pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp526C 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:10:19
Rory A. McMahon Commissioner ofAviation

DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION Stephanie A. Miner, Mayor

The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE**~---Washington,** DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: On behalfofSyracuse Hancock International Airport, I am writing to express our strong support for the Delta Air Lines application for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many corporations have a strong trade and market presence with Japan. With 5 daily

.flights between Syracuse and DetroitMetro Airport, our businesses would benefit from convenient connections to Tokyo's Haneda airport. Our community, too, would ertioy the enhanced relationship building benefit that would result should this application be granted. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia. This summerDeltais adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Delta made to DTW to make it the airlines gateway to Asia. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit ourbusiness travelers. Thank youforconsideration ofthis request Sincerely,

# ~!.~~ Commissioner ofAviation

HANCOCK INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT. SYRACUSE, N.Y. 13212 • (315) 454-3263 • FAX: (315) 454·8757 • www.syrairport.org
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              MARWICH II, LTD.
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2001, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Porath,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  01/1/99 to
Return on Equity and Assets                   Annualized           9/30/99
                                             --------------    ----------------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>
Return on average total assets                   (3.02)%             (4.02)%
Return on average equity                        (11.76)             (15.68)
Dividend payout ratio                                                  N/A
Average equity to average assets                                     25.65

Statement of Per Share Earnings

Net Loss                                                       $(1,416,846)
                                                               ============

Average shares outstanding                                       1,164,872

Basic and diluted loss per share                               $     (1.22)
                                                               ------------
</TABLE>
(No. 4260

#### Enoch Dutton, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 19, 1950.*

Roy A. Ptacin, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; William H. Sumpter, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*78Lawdsen, J.

Claimant, Enoch Dutton, seeks to recover from respondent under the Workmen’s Compensation Act for a percentage loss of use of his right hand by reason of an injury that resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment as an attendant at the Chicago State Hospital, operated by the Department of Public Welfare.

No jurisdictional questions are involved, and respondent has furnished all medical treatment required in this case.

On November 25,1949, claimant, while working some patients, slipped on an- icy pavement, fell, and injured his right hand. The fifth metacarpal sustained a compound fracture.

At the time of the hearing in this case the distal ends of the fourth and fifth metacarpals were enlarged. The fourth finger was held in fixed deformity. Limitation of motion was present to a marked degree in the fourth finger, and claimant has suffered considerable loss of grip. Callous formation in the metacarpals hampered claimant’s use of his hand.

From the foregoing we conclude that claimant has sustained a twenty-five per cent loss of use of his right hand. *Gray Attorney’s Textbook of Medicine*(1949) Vol. 2 pars. 185.02-.05.

On the date of his accident, claimant was 41 years of age, married, but had no children under 18 years of age dependent upon him for support. Claimant had *79worked for respondent only since August 1, 1949,' but employees in his same category customarily earn in excess of $1,560.00 per year. His rate of compensation is, therefore, $22.50 per week.

William J. Cleary *&*Co., Chicago, Illinois, was employed to take and transcribe the testimony before Commissioner Tearney. Charges in the amount of $37.15 were incurred, which charges are customary and reasonable; An award is entered in favor of William J. Cleary & Co. for $37.15.

Claimant was paid full salary for three days’ work he lost as a result of his accident, or the sum of $13.50. This payment for non-productive time will have to be deducted from his award.

An award is entered in favor of claimant, Enoch Dutton, under Section 8 (e) (12) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act for twenty-five per cent loss of use of his right hand, or 42% weeks at $22.50 per week, or the sum of $956.25, less overpayment of $13.50, leaving a net award of $942.75, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”
§ 669.420 What must be included in an on-the-job training contract? At a minimum, an on-the-job training contract must comply with the requirements of WIA sections 195(4) and 101(31) and must include: ( a ) The occupation(s) for which training is to be provided;
( b ) The duration of training;
( c ) The wage rate to be paid to the trainee;
( d ) The rate of reimbursement;
( e ) The maximum amount of reimbursement;
( f ) A training outline that reflects the work skills required for the position;
( g ) An outline of any other separate classroom training that may be provided by the employer; and
( h ) The employer's agreement to maintain and make available time and attendance, payroll and other records to support amounts claimed by the employer for reimbursement under the OJT contract.