alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 116

 117

 140

 142

 144

 154

 158

 165

 165

 161

 178

 158

 186

 159

 159

 170

 170

 164

 163

 163

 163

 162

 163

 160

 157

 160

 161

 161

 170

 229

 158

 108

 109

 119

 133

 139

 144

 148

 156

 151

 149

 148

 148

 150

 149

 151

 154

 156

 155

 153

 152

 152

 152

 152

 151

 151

 152

 145

 145

 154

 144

 146

 112

 112

 127

 138

 142

 149

 153

 160

 159

 155

 153

 153

 155

 152

 155

 160

 162

 159

 157

 158

 156

 157

 158

 155

 154

 156

 153

 153

 160

 159

 152

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2011 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2011

HIGH LOW MEAN

 51.1

 51.8

 51.7

 50.4

 49.3

 48.9

 48.6

 48.3

 48.1

 47.2

 48.0

 49.4

 50.1

 52.0

 51.5

 52.1

 52.4

 53.9

 52.6

 51.7

 51.9

 52.2

 52.1

 52.2

 52.1

 52.0

 51.6

 50.6

 51.9

 52.6

 52.4

 50.2

 51.2

 50.4

 49.4

 48.7

 48.6

 48.1

 47.7

 46.8

 45.5

 46.4

 47.3

 48.3

 50.1

 50.1

 51.0

 51.8

 52.1

 50.8

 49.3

 49.5

 50.1

 50.5

 50.4

 51.1

 51.1

 50.5

 50.2

 50.0

 51.0

 49.8

 50.6

 51.6

 50.9

 49.8

 48.9

 48.7

 48.3

 48.0

 47.7

 46.4

 47.0

 48.2

 49.2

 51.0

 50.8

 51.5

 52.1

 52.8

 51.9

 50.5

 50.6

 51.0

 51.1

 51.2

 51.5

 51.4

 50.9

 50.4

 50.9

 51.6

 51.1

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.7

 9.6

 9.5

 8.7

 9.0

 9.1

 9.3

 9.5

 9.7

 10.1

 10.1

 10.1

 10.0

 9.7

 9.9

 9.6

 9.4

 9.5

 9.7

 10.2

 10.2

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.7

 10.6

 10.6

 10.5

 10.9

 9.6

 9.2

 8.8

 8.5

 8.6

 9.0

 9.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 9.7

 9.6

 9.6

 8.8

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.6

 9.8

 9.8

 9.9

 10.0

 9.9

 9.9

 10.1

 10.1

 10.1

 9.9

 10.0

 9.7

 9.4

 9.3

 8.5

 8.8

 9.1

 9.3

 9.4

 9.6

 10.0

 10.1

 10.0

 9.9

 9.7

 9.7

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.5

 9.9

 10.0

 10.0

 10.1

 10.2

 10.1

 10.1

 10.3

 10.3

 10.3

 10.1

 10.4

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
§ 669.550 How are costs classified under the NFJP? ( a ) Costs are classified as follows: ( 1 ) Administrative costs, as defined in 20 CFR 667.220; and
( 2 ) Program costs, which are all other costs not defined as administrative.
( b ) Program costs must be classified and reported in the following categories: ( 1 ) Related assistance, including emergency assistance and supportive services, including allocated staff costs; and
( 2 ) All other program services, including allocated staff costs.
(No. 74-CC-271

#### Science Kit, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Superintendent of Public Instruction, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 31, 1974.*

Science Kit, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
Exhibit 32.1

NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of NTELOS HOLDINGS CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, James A. Hyde, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:

/s/ James A. HydeJames A. HydeChief Executive Officer and President


February 26, 2010
#### Irvinq S. Whiting et al., Respondents, v. Tower’s Stores, Incorporated, Appellant.

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present— Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 782.]
#### New York Central Railroad Company et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Richard F. Harrison et al., Respondents-Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Motion (1) for an order,correcting the order of reversal entered herein October 3, 1947 (272 App. Div. 531), to conform it to the decision of the court; (2) for an order permitting the defendants to appeal to the Court of Appeals upon certified questions; (3) if such motions be denied, for an order granting a reargument of the appeal taken herein by the plaintiff; (4) if such motions be denied, for directions for the guidance of the Special Term and the Commission on the rehearing directed to be had by this court. Motions denied in all respects, without costs. All concur, except MeCurn, J., who dissents and votes to amend the order of reversal so as to read “on the law” and to certify to the Court of Appeals the question as to the correct rule for ascertaining the damages. Present — Harris, MeCurn, Larkin and Love, JJ.
§ 658.400 Purpose and scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the regulations governing the Complaint System for the Wagner-Peyser Act Employment Service (ES) at the State and Federal levels. Specifically, the Complaint System processes complaints against an employer about the specific job to which the applicant was referred through the ES and complaints involving the failure to comply with the ES regulations under parts 651, 652, 653, and 654 of this chapter and this part. As noted in § 658.411(d)(6), this subpart only covers ES-related complaints made within 2 years of the alleged violation.
( b ) Any complaints alleging violations under the Unemployment Insurance program, under Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) title I programs, or complaints by veterans alleging employer violations of the mandatory listing requirements under 38 U.S.C. 4212 are not covered by this subpart and must be referred to the appropriate administering agency which would follow the procedures set forth in the respective regulations.
( c ) The Complaint System also accepts, refers, and, under certain circumstances, tracks complaints involving employment-related laws as defined in § 651.10 of this chapter.
( d ) A complainant may designate an individual to act as their representative.
[81 FR 56352, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 82731, Nov. 24, 2023]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 978.01

 978.04

 978.15

 978.19

 978.20

 978.22

 978.19

 978.23

 978.37

 978.35

 978.28

 978.23

 978.35

 978.33

 978.41

 978.42

 978.35

 978.23

 978.37

 978.51

 978.50

 978.57

 978.58

 978.46

 978.54

 978.77

 978.92

 979.10

 979.15

 979.37

 979.53

 1,277.7

 1,278.0

 1,278.9

 1,279.2

 1,279.3

 1,279.5

 1,279.2

 1,279.6

 1,280.8

 1,280.6

 1,280.0

 1,279.6

 1,280.6

 1,280.4

 1,281.1

 1,281.2

 1,280.6

 1,279.6

 1,280.8

 1,281.9

 1,281.9

 1,282.4

 1,282.5

 1,281.5

 1,282.2

 1,284.1

 1,285.4

 1,286.9

 1,287.3

 1,289.2

 1,290.6

STORAGE

+1.0

+0.3

+0.9

+0.3

+0.1

+0.2

-0.3

+0.3

+1.2

-0.2

-0.6

-0.4

+1.0

-0.2

+0.7

+0.1

-0.6

-1.0

+1.2

+1.2

-0.1

+0.6

+0.1

-1.0

+0.7

+1.9

+1.3

+1.5

+0.4

+1.9

+1.4

CHANGE

2,240

2,252

2,295

2,239

2,399

2,374

2,489

2,262

2,396

2,341

2,227

2,062

2,304

2,372

2,325

2,451

2,608

2,556

2,361

2,140

2,570

2,271

1,909

1,833

1,773

2,027

2,314

2,330

2,107

2,200

2,405

INFLOW

 1,672

 2,102

 1,700

 2,015

 2,319

 2,235

 2,513

 2,054

 1,714

 2,418

 2,508

 2,230

 1,718

 2,392

 1,947

 2,344

 2,850

 3,055

 1,701

 1,512

 2,541

 1,941

 1,818

 2,269

 1,398

 1,006

 1,632

 1,538

 1,853

 1,179

 1,648

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 60

 22

 128

 54

 38

 54

 103

 38

 87

 8

 16

 44

 76

 65

 38

 65

 55

 11

 65

 33

 71

 33

 49

 74

 35

 44

 44

 25

 41

 82

 74

C.F.S.

 .22

 .08

 .47

 .20

 .14

 .20

 .38

 .14

 .32

 .03

 .06

 .16

 .28

 .24

 .14

 .24

 .20

 .04

 .24

 .12

 .26

 .12

 .18

 .27

 .13

 .16

 .16

 .09

 .15

 .30

 .27

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .73

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .17

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .24

 .46

 .56

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2010 NEW MELONES LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 1, 2010

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS +13.9 70,432 61,822 0 0 1,632 5.99 2.19

ACRE-FEET +13,900 139,702 122,624 0 0 3,237

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 122,624

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 122,624

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 2.19

JULY 1, 2009 36.69

 1,276.7
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.923 Multiple impairments. ( a ) *Unrelated severe impairments.* We cannot combine two or more unrelated severe impairments to meet the 12-month duration test. If you have a severe impairment(s) and then develop another unrelated severe impairment(s) but neither one is expected to last for 12 months, we cannot find you disabled, even though the two impairments in combination last for 12 months.
( b ) *Concurrent impairments.* If you have two or more concurrent impairments that, when considered in combination, are severe, we must determine whether the combined effect of your impairments can be expected to continue to be severe for 12 months. If one or more of your impairments improves or is expected to improve within 12 months, so that the combined effect of your remaining impairments is no longer severe, we will find that you do not meet the 12-month duration test.
( c ) *Combined effect.* In determining whether your physical or mental impairment or impairments are of a sufficient medical severity that such impairment or impairments could be the basis of eligibility under the law, we will consider the combined effect of all of your impairments without regard to whether any such impairment, if considered separately, would be of sufficient severity. If we do find a medically severe combination of impairments, we will consider the combined impact of the impairments throughout the disability determination process. If we do not find that you have a medically severe combination of impairments, we will determine that you are not disabled (see §§ 416.920 and 416.924).
[82 FR 5879, Jan. 18, 2017]
101 - First Amendment to US ESPP



		

			Exhibit 10.1

		


		

			 

		




		
			NCS MULTISTAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
		

		
			EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
		

		
			FOR US EMPLOYEES
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT
		

		
			NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), having reserved to the Company’s Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee (the “Committee”) the right under Section 18.8 of the NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan for US Employees, as effective as of August 3, 2017 (the “Plan”), to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan as follows:
		

		
			Effective as of December 31, 2018, Section 5 and Section 6.4 are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:
		

		
			“5.Offering Periods. The Plan shall be implemented by a series of Offering Periods. Unless otherwise provided by the Committee, Offering Periods shall run from January 1st through June 30th and July 1st through December 31st. The Committee shall have the authority to change the duration, frequency, start and end dates of Offering Periods prior to their date of commencement (up to a maximum Offering Period of 27 months).”
		

		
			“6.4Grant of Option. On each Offering Date, each Participant in the applicable Offering Period shall be granted an option to purchase, on the Purchase Date, a number of shares of Common Stock determined by dividing the Participant's accumulated payroll deductions by the applicable Purchase Price; provided, however, that in no event shall any Participant purchase more than 1,041 shares of Common Stock per Offering Period (or such other number as the Committee may establish from time to time before an Offering Period begins).  Any amount remaining in the Participant’s notional account as of the Purchase Date in excess of the amount that may be applied to purchase shares as a result of the limitations set forth herein (or as designated by the administrator of the Plan) shall be carried over to the next Offering Period, unless the Committee establishes otherwise.”
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			EXECUTED this 14th day of November, 2018, but effective as of the date set forth above.
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ John Deane

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						John Deane, Chairman

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee of NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

				



		
			﻿
#### § 640.5 Criteria for compliance.

The criteria in the schedule below shall apply in determining whether, in the administration of a State law, there has been substantial compliance with the provision required by section 303(a)(1) in the issuance of benefit payments to eligible claimants for the first compensable weeks of unemployment in their benefit years:

| | Percentage of first payments issued—days following end of first compensable week | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14 days, waiting week States | 21 days, nonwaiting week States1 | 35 days, all States |
| **Intrastate Claims** | | | |
| Performance to be achieved for the 12-mo. period ending on March 31 of each year | 87 | 87 | 93 |
| **Interstate Claims** | | | |
| Performance to be achieved for the 12-mo. period ending on March 31 of each year | 70 | 70 | 78 |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 A nonwaiting week State is any State whose law does not require that a non-compensable period of unemployment be served before the payment of benefits commences. | | | |

A State will be deemed to comply substantially, as set out in [§§ 640.2(b)](/on/2024-09-03/title-20/section-640.2#p-640.2(b)) and [640.3(b)](/on/2024-09-03/title-20/section-640.3#p-640.3(b)), if its average performance, for the period of review, meets or exceeds the applicable criteria set forth above.

[[43 FR 33225](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/43-FR-33225), July 28, 1978, as amended at [71 FR 35516](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-35516), June 21, 2006]
him. Lash asserts he was entitled to this instruction because police failed 

to gather evidence of the threat that was available at the scene. An 

evidentiary presumption is warranted where police demonstrate gross 

negligence by failing to gather material evidence. Daniels v. State, 114 

Nev. 261, 267-68, 956 P.2d 111, 115 (1998). Here there was no 

demonstration that the police acted with gross negligence. Therefore, the 

district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Lash's motion. See 

Ouanbengboune, 125 Nev. at 774, 220 P.3d at 1129. 

Finally, Lash contends that cumulative error deprived him of 

a fair trial. Because he demonstrates only one possible error, we conclude 

that Lash is not entitled to relief on this claim. See U.S. v. Sager, 227 

F.3d 1138, 1149 (9th Cir. 2000) ("One error is not cumulative error."). 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. 

Hardesty 

l Parrag

erry 

cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge 

State Public Defender/Carson City 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Carson City District Attorney 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

MHO OEM gilZW:MEATS
### §§3181, 3182. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Sections were omitted in the general amendment of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. 89–10, by Pub. L. 103–382, title I, §101, Oct. 20, 1994, 108 Stat. 3519.

Section 3181, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §5111, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 253; amended Pub. L. 100–690, title III, §§3301, 3308(b), Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4247, 4251; Pub. L. 101–226, §2, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1928; Pub. L. 101–647, title XV, §§1506(b), 1509(a), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4841, 4842, authorized appropriations.

Section 3182, Pub. L. 89–10, title V, §5112, as added Pub. L. 100–297, title I, §1001, Apr. 28, 1988, 102 Stat. 253; amended Pub. L. 101–226, §3, Dec. 12, 1989, 103 Stat. 1928; Pub. L. 101–647, title XV, §1509(b), Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4842, related to reservations and State allotments of funds.
### §2770a. Exchange of training and related support

#### (a) Authorization; eligibility; scope

Subject to subsection (b), the President may provide training and related support to military and civilian defense personnel of a friendly foreign country or an international organization. Such training and related support shall be provided by a Secretary of a military department and may include the provision of transportation, food services, health services, and logistics and the use of facilities and equipment.

#### (b) Reciprocal arrangements; reimbursement

Training and related support may be provided under this section only pursuant to an agreement or other arrangement providing for the provision by the recipient foreign country or international organization, on a reciprocal basis, of comparable training and related support to military and civilian personnel under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of the military department providing the training and related support under this section. Such reciprocal training and related support must be provided within a reasonable period of time (which may not be more than one year) of the provision of training and related support by the United States. To the extent that a foreign country or international organization to which training and related support is provided under this section does not provide such comparable training and related support to the United States within a reasonable period of time, that country or international organization shall be required to reimburse the United States for the full costs of the training and related support provided by the United States.

#### (c) Regulations

Training and related support under this section shall be provided under regulations prescribed by the President.

#### (d) Report to Congress

Not later than February 1 of each year, the President shall submit to the Congress a report on the activities conducted pursuant to this section during the preceding fiscal year, including the estimated full costs of the training and related support provided by the United States to each country and international organization and the estimated value of the training and related support provided to the United States by that country or international organization.

(Pub. L. 90–629, ch. 2C, §30A, as added Pub. L. 99–83, title I, §116, Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 201.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1985, see section 1301 of Pub. L. 99–83, set out as an Effective Date of 1985 Amendment note under section 2151–1 of this title.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

For delegation of functions of the President under this section, see section 1(d) of Ex. Ord. No. 13637, Mar. 8, 2013, 78 F.R. 16129, set out as a note under section 2751 of this title. Functions were previously delegated by Ex. Ord. No. 11958, which was formerly set out as a note under section 2751 of this title and was revoked, subject to a savings provision, by section 4 of Ex. Ord. No. 13637.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEVATION

 240.01

 240.31

 240.43

 239.68

 238.97

 238.70

 238.55

 242.28

 239.62

 239.25

 239.15

 240.85

 239.17

 238.80

 238.84

 238.75

 238.62

 238.55

 239.09

 239.15

 239.08

 239.08

 239.04

 239.03

 238.99

 238.98

 239.10

 240.10

 240.93

 240.14

 239.59

 471

 513

 529

 432

 347

 319

 304

 811

 424

 380

 368

 587

 370

 330

 334

 325

 311

 304

 361

 368

 360

 360

 355

 354

 349

 348

 362

 484

 598

 489

 421

STORAGE

-87

+42

+16

-97

-85

-28

-15

+507

-387

-44

-12

+219

-217

-40

+4

-9

-14

-7

+57

+7

-8

+0

-5

-1

-5

-1

+14

+122

+114

-109

-68

CHANGE

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 8,861

 9,115

 10,200

 8,400

 7,270

 6,930

 6,530

 12,600

 9,170

 8,040

 15,800

 9,520

 7,940

 6,310

 7,030

 6,140

 6,680

 6,530

 6,640

 6,800

 6,700

 6,620

 6,370

 6,450

 6,390

 6,530

 16,800

 10,800

 12,200

 9,320

 7,920

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2005 RED BLUFF DIVERSION RESERVOIR DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: February 22, 2005

IN LAKE

CANAL

 ACRE-FEET

TOTALS -137 0 262,606

ACRE-FEET -137 0 520,879

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 520,879

 558

RELEASE

RIVER

CORNING TO SACTO

CANAL

RELEASE C.F.S

TEHAMA

COLUSA

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

CORNING CANAL 0

TEHAMA-COLUSA CANAL 0

TO SACTO RIVER 520,879

Table 9