alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §2221. Food emergency response network

The Secretary, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and State, local, and tribal governments shall, not later than 180 days after January 4, 2011, and biennially thereafter, submit to the relevant committees of Congress, and make publicly available on the Internet Web site of the Department of Health and Human Services, a report on the progress in implementing a national food emergency response laboratory network that—

(1) provides ongoing surveillance, rapid detection, and surge capacity for large-scale food-related emergencies, including intentional adulteration of the food supply;

(2) coordinates the food laboratory capacities of State, local, and tribal food laboratories, including the adoption of novel surveillance and identification technologies and the sharing of data between Federal agencies and State laboratories to develop national situational awareness;

(3) provides accessible, timely, accurate, and consistent food laboratory services throughout the United States;

(4) develops and implements a methods repository for use by Federal, State, and local officials;

(5) responds to food-related emergencies; and

(6) is integrated with relevant laboratory networks administered by other Federal agencies.

(Pub. L. 111–353, title II, §202(b), Jan. 4, 2011, 124 Stat. 3929.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Secretary, referred to in text, probably means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Marwich II, Ltd.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 8, 2006


/s/ Michael Schumacher
----------------------------
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 95

 103

 106

 97

 98

 115

 116

 95

 89

 104

 104

 100

 114

 97

 117

 98

 197

 96

 134

 125

 109

 110

 127

 108

 112

 118

 129

 111

 108

 108

 85

 91

 93

 94

 94

 97

 76

 82

 73

 82

 88

 92

 94

 93

 93

 95

 94

 90

 89

 99

 98

 100

 98

 93

 90

 98

 106

 95

 95

 96

 89

 94

 96

 95

 95

 104

 99

 90

 86

 90

 93

 95

 98

 95

 104

 96

 103

 91

 100

 108

 102

 105

 105

 99

 97

 105

 114

 101

 99

 100

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2010 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 1, 2010

HIGH LOW MEAN

 59.5

 59.8

 60.4

 61.0

 61.9

 61.9

 60.6

 59.1

 57.6

 57.8

 56.1

 55.2

 54.8

 55.2

 56.5

 56.7

 56.0

 55.6

 55.1

 55.3

 57.4

 53.9

 54.1

 51.7

 48.4

 48.1

 49.4

 49.2

 48.6

 48.7

 57.1

 57.4

 58.1

 58.4

 59.5

 59.9

 59.0

 57.1

 55.4

 55.9

 54.2

 52.9

 52.7

 52.5

 54.0

 54.3

 53.7

 53.5

 53.8

 53.7

 53.1

 52.4

 52.0

 48.9

 46.6

 45.7

 47.1

 47.1

 46.6

 46.6

 58.3

 58.6

 59.1

 59.6

 60.5

 60.8

 60.1

 58.1

 56.6

 56.7

 55.2

 54.1

 53.8

 53.8

 55.0

 55.4

 55.0

 54.5

 54.4

 54.6

 54.6

 53.2

 53.0

 50.0

 47.6

 46.9

 48.2

 48.1

 47.7

 47.7

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.4

 9.6

 9.6

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.3

 9.8

 10.2

 10.2

 10.5

 10.9

 10.9

 10.9

 10.7

 10.6

 10.8

 10.9

 10.7

 10.0

 10.3

 10.7

 10.5

 11.1

 11.6

 11.6

 11.2

 11.1

 11.4

 11.8

 9.1

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.2

 9.1

 9.2

 9.3

 9.8

 9.9

 10.1

 10.4

 10.5

 10.4

 10.2

 10.1

 10.1

 10.4

 10.0

 9.1

 8.1

 10.1

 10.2

 10.4

 11.2

 11.1

 10.6

 10.6

 10.9

 11.2

 9.3

 9.4

 9.4

 9.4

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 9.6

 10.0

 10.1

 10.3

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.4

 10.3

 10.4

 10.6

 10.5

 9.7

 9.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.8

 11.4

 11.4

 10.9

 10.9

 11.1

 11.5

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** FAA- 20 12 - 0 592 DMS Docket Number 2011NM253 AD Directorate (Old) Docket Number, If Any SB 601R - 57 - 052 --- 7/28/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Bruce L. Claflin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of 3Com Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter endedAugust 29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of 3Com Corporation.

 

 
| Date:  | October 10, 2003 |   | By:                                   | /s/ BRUCE L. CLAFLIN |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   |             | Name:  | Bruce L. Claflin                      |
|   |             | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|        |                  |        |                                       |                      |        |  |

 

 

 

I, Mark Slaven, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the QuarterlyReport of 3Com Corporation on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year quarter endedAugust 29, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in suchQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of 3Com Corporation.

 

 
| Date:  | October 10, 2003 |                                                                      | By: |  /s/ MARK SLAVEN |   |
|--------|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Name:            |  Mark Slaven                                                         |
|   | Title:           |  Executive Vice President,  Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

244) ll-K- (I) -57 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:57 AM Sheet 244 of 325 
P.2 

ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS. 

DOE. 

<A 

H-K-(I)-57 

July 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-57
Arrs~liu 11. TEXAS

September 21, 1961

Honorable James A.. Doherty CpfnionNo. WW-1151 County Attorney San Augustine County Rez Whether a County CommisSan Augustine,Texas sioner 1s authorized to announce his candidacy or fn fact become a candida'tefor the office of County Judge without
Dear Mr. Doherty: first resigninghis present office as Commissioner.
Your request for an opinion states that Commfssloner E. H.~WarrS Frecinct 2, San Augustine County,wants to become a candidate for the office of County Judge fn the next Democratic party ,pr&nary which is to be held on the ffrst Saturday in May, 1962. You state further thathe was last electedas Commissioner in the November 1958 GeneralElection, and his present term expires on .December31, 1562. In view of the foregoing circumstancesyou ask:

Whether County CommissionerE. Hz. Warrp is authorized %o announce la33za,ndidacy or .Lr! fact become a caridida~te for the offlce of County .:udge without first resigninghis present office as Commissfoner. :The answer to th.isquestfon is I*esolved by a provision sn Sectfon 65 of Artfcle XVI of the Texas Conetitution, which was added by an amendment proposed by the Legislature in 1957a:33 adopted in 1.958. Thf8 pro~vlsion reads as 'follows: "Frovlie3,however,,if any of the ,3iiflcere

named here!.nSYiS.ll. announce 5f:ei.r cardidacy, or shall fn fact beco.me a candidate, in any Cener*al, Spec,ial OS'Erimary Election, for tc/yoffice of ~roflt,or tmat urder the laws of this jtate or ,the

United Sta.tes

other than theHonorable James A. Doherty, Page 2 (WW-1151)

ofFi@? +he? held

v -I > at any tim.e whe.nthe unexpired.

term of the office then held shall exceedme (1)year, such announeement or such candfaacs shall constitute an automatic resrgnation of the office then held, and the vacancy thereby cseated shallbe fflled pursuant to law In the camemanner as other vacancies for such offiw are f’iLle?.” (Emphasisadded) This amendment forbi5s certain named officials, including County Commissioners,from announcing OP becomfng a candl,date

in :>eneral,

Special, or Fri.mary elections, for any office of profit or trust at any timewhen the unexpired term exceeds one year. Such announcement or candfdacy constitutes an automatic resignation of the offMe then held.

therefore, should Mr. Warr aonounce or become such candidate befor::January 1, 

### 1362,he w0ll.M vacate his present office; such ast:lon afte:r January 1, would not encounter the c05s~tit~itlocal bagn. S U PI M A R Y .-- A cmnty Commissioner is authorized by Sec:t:i~r, 65, Article XVI of the TexaH ~onst-itution, as amen?ea 

### ig58, to a:nnounce

his canc?.idacy



### or in fagt become a cakidate for the office of County Judgewithout 

### rid retaignfng lire pPeseTYtOffir,'

~rcwided that a.t the 'dateof hlflancounaementhis urexplrec?term of offfce "oea not er.ceedone year. Youra very truly, WILL WILSCN Attorney General of Texas

1Rwjr:lgh:mmr ’

Honorable James A. Doherty, Page 

### 3 (WW-1151)

APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE: W. V, Geppert, Chairman Henry G. Braswell Joe B. McMaster H. Grady Chandler Wm. R. Hemphlll
REVIEWED FOR ?RE ATTORNEY GENERAL
BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 3,938

 4,785

 4,855

 4,300

 4,265

 4,022

 4,427

 4,901

 7,293

 7,649

 9,336

 12,742

 15,287

 16,569

 15,150

 9,625

 7,976

 6,938

 6,212

 5,324

 6,376

 5,497

 5,481

 6,050

 5,618

 13,562

 14,592

 9,196

 8,150

 7,630

 7,376

 93,531

 92,595

 92,511

 92,498

 91,958

 91,412

 90,662

 90,335

 90,474

 92,879

 95,501

 99,595

 106,721

 115,907

 125,852

 133,952

 136,398

 137,156

 136,889

 135,946

 134,206

 133,553

 132,098

 130,700

 129,912

 128,754

 135,200

 142,302

 143,924

 144,470

 144,495

 393,250

 394,470

 387,684

 380,208

 378,502

 377,926

 377,900

 378,129

 14,000

 28,086

 41,405

 54,142

 67,373

 80,725

 94,173

 107,691

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2006 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: April 11, 2007

 97,469

 97,380

 97,366

 96,798

 96,223

 95,434

 95,089

 95,236

 97,767

 100,528

 104,837

 112,337

 122,008

 132,476

 141,002

 143,577

 144,374

 144,094

 143,101

 141,270

 140,582

 139,050

 137,579

 136,750

 135,530

 142,316

 149,792

 151,498

 152,074

 152,100

 151,871

 1,286,000

 1,271,914

 1,258,595

 1,245,858

 1,232,627

 1,219,275

 1,205,827

 1,192,309

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,252,000

 3,266,000

 3,280,000

 3,293,000

 3,306,000

 3,319,000

 3,333,000

 3,346,000

 3,360,000

 0.0356

 0.0712

 0.1068

 0.1424

 0.1780

 0.2136

 0.2492

 0.2848

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 98,454
#### Lewis A. Dreyer, as Administrator of the Estate of Ballard Macdonald, Deceased, v. Shapiro-Bernstein & Co., Inc.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *ante,*p. 760.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 122.94

 122.71

 122.86

 123.70

 123.88

 123.58

 124.17

 124.02

 123.12

 123.69

 123.88

 124.22

 125.04

 124.36

 123.97

 123.62

 123.84

 123.82

 124.15

 123.86

 123.61

 123.62

 123.90

 123.60

 123.46

 123.33

 123.48

 123.61

 123.63

 123.16

 7,764

 7,661

 7,728

 8,120

 8,205

 8,064

 8,346

 8,271

 7,847

 8,115

 8,205

 8,371

 8,783

 8,441

 8,247

 8,082

 8,186

 8,176

 8,336

 8,195

 8,078

 8,082

 8,214

 8,073

 8,007

 7,946

 8,017

 8,078

 8,087

 7,866

STORAGE

-140

-103

+67

+392

+85

-141

+282

-75

-424

+268

+90

+166

+412

-342

-194

-165

+104

-10

+160

-141

-117

+4

+132

-141

-66

-61

+71

+61

+9

-221

CHANGE

2,453

3,062

3,084

3,236

3,075

2,977

3,203

3,012

2,854

2,794

2,152

2,131

2,193

1,837

1,955

1,968

2,184

2,019

2,132

2,116

2,539

2,639

2,712

2,553

2,705

2,610

2,783

2,684

2,660

2,167

INFLOW

 2,419

 3,006

 2,947

 2,943

 2,942

 2,965

 2,966

 2,951

 2,968

 2,561

 2,009

 1,949

 1,739

 1,901

 1,940

 1,942

 2,033

 1,925

 1,953

 2,097

 2,509

 2,548

 2,550

 2,521

 2,621

 2,530

 2,641

 2,546

 2,546

 2,170

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 142

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 59

 61

 60

 60

 60

 51

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

 60

HATCHERY

 4

 3

 3

 2

 2

 3

 4

 4

 5

 3

 3

 3

 4

 4

 3

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 4

 3

 3

 0

 1

 2

 4

 3

C.F.S.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2001 LAKE NATOMA DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 16, 2001

IN LAKE

EVAP

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

TOTALS -38 76,489 73,338 142 1,791 98

ACRE-FEET -38 151,716 145,466 282 3,552 194

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 145,466

SPILL 282

FOLSOM SOUTH CANAL

HATCHERY

 2,255

 3,552

 7,904

FOLSOM

SOUTH 

CANAL

 41

 45

 40

 33

 28

 20

 31

 35

 35

 35

 35

 35

 40

 45

 49

 45

 35

 35

 43

 26

 25

 25

 31

 40

 54

 51

 45

 45

 45

 45

 1,137

 2,255

(1)

(1) INCHES OF EVAPORATION TAKEN FROM FOLSOM PAN.

RELEASES (ACRE-FEET)

TOTAL 151,555

Table 12
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7360

BOBBY JUNIOR OLDHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RICKY ANDERSON; RICKY JORDAN; LONNIE BELL, Sergeant; M. SMITH, Sergeant; SHIRLEY LYNCH, Nurse; CONNIE BARROW, Nurse; W. MARROW, Sergeant; KENNETH LANIER; MR. LAWRENCE; MR. CLIFTON; SGT. JENKINS; SERGEANT MOSELEY; OFFICER LASSITER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-404-5-CT-F) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 23, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby Junior Oldham, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Oldham v. Anderson , No. CA-94-404-5-CT-F (E.D.N.C.Aug. 16, 1995). We note that Appellant has failed to show any significant injury resulting from the alleged deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs sufficient to rise to the level of a constitutional wrong. See Miltier v. Beorn , 896 F.2d 848 (4th Cir.1990). We also note that in light of the lack of merit of Appellant's complaint, the d istrict court did not abuse its broad discretion in declining to grant default judgment against Appellee Anderson. See Educational Servs., Inc. v. Maryland State Bd. for Higher Educ. , 710 F.2d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 1983). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §1741f. Rule of construction

Nothing in this subchapter may be construed to authorize a private right of action.

(Pub. L. 116–260, div. FF, title III, §308, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3099.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

This subchapter, referred to in text, was in the original "this Act" and was translated as reading "this subtitle", meaning subtitle A (§§301–308) of title III of div. FF of Pub. L. 116–260, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3091, known as the Robert Levinson Hostage Recovery and Hostage-Taking Accountability Act, which enacted this subchapter, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
#### Fred D. BROWN, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 12215.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 25, 1954.

Decided July 1, 1954.

Mr. William Beasley Harris, with whom Mr. Curtis P. Mitchell, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. Samuel J. L’Hommedieu, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and Lewis A. Carroll and Alfred Hant-man, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, WASHINGTON, and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, convicted of possessing numbers slips, contends the warrant for *34his arrest was issued without probable cause. We find no lack of probable cause and no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.
§ 219.35 Evidence that a marriage has ended. ( a ) *Preferred evidence.* Preferred evidence that a marriage has ended is— ( 1 ) A certified copy of the decree of divorce or annulment; or
( 2 ) Evidence of the death (See § 219.23) of a party to the marriage.
( b ) *Other evidence that a marriage has ended.* If preferred evidence that the marriage has ended cannot be obtained, the claimant must explain the reason therefor and submit other convincing evidence that the marriage has ended.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 3220-0021 and 3220-0140)
### §290g–23. Multilateral debt relief

(a) The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to contribute, on behalf of the United States, not more than $54,620,000 to the African Development Fund for the purpose of funding debt relief costs under the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative incurred in the period governed by the thirteenth replenishment of resources of the African Development Fund, subject to obtaining the necessary appropriations and without prejudice to any funding arrangements in existence on December 16, 2014.

(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution provided for in subsection (a), there are authorized to be appropriated, without fiscal year limitation, not more than $54,620,000 for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(c) In this section, the term "Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative" means the proposal set out in the G8 Finance Ministers' Communique entitled "Conclusions on Development," done at London, June 11, 2005, and reaffirmed by G8 Heads of State at the Gleneagles Summit on July 8, 2005.

(Pub. L. 94–302, title II, §224, as added Pub. L. 113–235, div. J, title VII, §7083(c), Dec. 16, 2014, 128 Stat. 2685.)
### §290d. Enactment of specific legislation by Congress

In adopting this subchapter, the Congress does so with the understanding that nothing in the Constitution of the World Health Organization in any manner commits the United States to enact any specific legislative program regarding any matters referred to in said Constitution.

(June 14, 1948, ch. 469, §5, 62 Stat. 442.)