FORM 10-QSB--QUARTERLY OR TRANSITIONAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                     THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                        Quarterly or Transitional Report



                   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB

(Mark One)
[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002


[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


             For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-13408


                          CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX
      (Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)



         California                                              94-2930770
(State or other jurisdiction of                               (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                          55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089
                       Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                   (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)


Check  whether the issuer (1) filed all reports  required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X  No___

<PAGE>
                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

a)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX

                 STATEMENT OF NET LIABILITIES IN LIQUIDATION
                                   (unaudited)

                                 March 31, 2002



     Assets
        Cash and cash equivalents                                       $  251
        Receivables and deposits                                            13
        Debt trustee escrow                                                714

                                                                           978
     Liabilities
        Other liabilities                                                   81
        Non-recourse promissory notes (Note A)                           1,599
        Estimated costs during the period of liquidation                    39

                                                                         1,719

     Net liabilities in liquidation                                     $ (741)

                See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

<PAGE>

b)

                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX

            STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET LIABILITIES IN LIQUIDATION
                                   (Unaudited)
                                (in thousands)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              For the Three Months Ended
                                                                       March 31,
                                                                  2002           2001

<S>                                                              <C>           <C>
Net liabilities in liquidation at beginning of period            $ (775)       $(1,154)

Changes in net liabilities in liquidation attributed to:
   Decrease in cash and cash equivalents                           (429)          (730)
   Decrease in receivables and deposits                              --            (65)
   Increase in debt trustee escrow                                  384            747
   Increase in investment properties                                 --            671
   Decrease in accounts payable                                      --             50
   Increase in tenant security deposit payable                       --             (3)
   Decrease in accrued property taxes                                --             66
   Decrease (increase) in other liabilities                          10            (16)
   Increase in Nonrecourse Promissory Notes and interest            (18)           (97)
   Decrease (increase) in estimated costs during the
     period of liquidation                                           87            (86)

Net liabilities in liquidation at end of period                  $ (741)        $ (617)

                See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>
c)
                           CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX

                          NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)


Note A - Basis of Presentation

As of December  31,  1999,  Century  Properties  Fund XX (the  "Partnership"  or
"Registrant")  adopted the  liquidation  basis of accounting due to the imminent
loss of its remaining investment properties.

The Partnership's Nonrecourse Promissory Notes, which had a balance of principal
and accrued interest of approximately  $1,599,000 at March 31, 2002,  matured on
November  30,  1998.  The  Partnership  was in default due to  non-payment  upon
maturity.  Fox Capital Management  Corporation  ("FCMC" or the "Managing General
Partner"), the general partner of the Partnership's general partner,  previously
contacted the indenture  trustee for the Notes and certain  holders of the Notes
regarding  this  default.  On October 28, 1999 the  Partnership  entered  into a
forbearance  agreement  with the indenture  trustee for a period of 390 days. In
turn,  the  Partnership  agreed to (a) deliver to the indenture  trustee for the
benefit of the note holders all of the accumulated cash of the Partnership, less
certain  reserves  and  anticipated  operating  expenses,  (b) market all of its
properties  for  sale,  (c)  deliver  all cash  proceeds  from any  sales to the
indenture  trustee  until the notes are fully  satisfied and (d) comply with the
reporting requirements under the indenture. At the expiration of the forbearance
period,  the  Partnership  had not sold all of its  properties  or satisfied the
Nonrecourse  Promissory  Notes. With the consent of the indenture  trustee,  the
forbearance   period  was  extended  to  August  31,  2001.   The  sale  of  the
Partnership's  remaining  asset  in  October  2001 did not  generate  sufficient
proceeds  to pay off the  Nonrecourse  Promissory  Notes in full.  The  Managing
General  Partner is working with the debt trustee  regarding a final  payment to
the  noteholders.  Once this  payment is made,  the  Partnership  is expected to
terminate.  The Managing General Partner is a subsidiary of Apartment Investment
and  Management  Company  ("AIMCO"),  a publicly  traded real estate  investment
trust.

As a result of the  decision  to  liquidate  the  Partnership,  the  Partnership
changed its basis of  accounting  for its  financial  statements at December 31,
1999, to the  liquidation  basis of accounting.  Consequently,  assets have been
valued at estimated net realizable  value and liabilities are presented at their
estimated   settlement   amounts.   The  valuation  of  assets  and  liabilities
necessarily  requires many estimates and  assumptions  and there are substantial
uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation.  The actual realization of assets
and  settlement of liabilities  could be higher or lower than amounts  indicated
and is based upon the Managing General Partner's estimates as of the date of the
financial statements.

Included in liabilities in the statement of net liabilities in liquidation as of
March 31,  2002 is  approximately  $39,000  of costs,  net of  income,  that the
Managing  General  Partner  estimates  will be  incurred  during  the  period of
liquidation  based  on the  assumption  that  the  liquidation  process  will be
completed by June 30, 2002. Because the success in realization of assets and the
settlement  of  liabilities  is based on the  Managing  General  Partner's  best
estimates,  the  liquidation  period may be shorter than  projected or it may be
extended beyond the projected period.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments
to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

Affiliates of the Managing General Partner received reimbursement of accountable
administrative  expenses amounting to approximately  $20,000 and $25,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Beginning in 2001, the Partnership  began insuring its remaining  property up to
certain   limits  through   coverage   provided  by  AIMCO  which  is  generally
self-insured  for a  portion  of  losses  and  liabilities  related  to  workers
compensation,  property casualty and vehicle liability.  The Partnership insured
its property above the AIMCO limits through insurance policies obtained by AIMCO
from insurers  unaffiliated with the Managing General Partner.  During the three
months  ended  March 31,  2001,  the  Partnership  was  charged by AIMCO and its
affiliates  approximately $6,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated with
policy claims administration.

Note C - Sale of Investment Property

On October 23, 2001, the  Partnership  sold Highland Park Commerce  Center to an
unaffiliated third party for $5,553,000. The net sales proceeds of approximately
$5,339,000  were wired  directly  to the  indenture  trustee as  required by the
forbearance agreement.

Note D - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002, the Court heard argument on the
motion and ordered  further  briefing  after which time the matter will be taken
under submission. The Court has set the matter for trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership is unaware of any other pending or outstanding  litigation that
is not of a routine nature arising in the ordinary course of business.

<PAGE>
ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS

The  matters  discussed  in this Form  10-QSB  contain  certain  forward-looking
statements  and  involve  risks and  uncertainties  (including  changing  market
conditions,   competitive  and  regulatory   matters,   etc.)  detailed  in  the
disclosures  contained  in this  Form  10-QSB  and the  other  filings  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission made by the  Partnership  from time to time.
The  discussion  of  the  Partnership's  business  and  results  of  operations,
including  forward-looking  statements pertaining to such matters, does not take
into account the effects of any changes to the Registrant's business and results
of operations.  Accordingly,  actual results could differ  materially from those
projected in the forward-looking  statements as a result of a number of factors,
including those identified herein.

At March 31, 2002, the Partnership had no investment properties.

As of December  31,  1999,  Century  Properties  Fund XX (the  "Partnership"  or
"Registrant")  adopted the  liquidation  basis of accounting due to the imminent
loss of its  remaining  investment  properties.  The  Partnership's  Nonrecourse
Promissory  Notes,  which had a balance of  principal  and  accrued  interest of
approximately  $1,599,000 at March 31, 2002,  matured on November 30, 1998.  The
Partnership  was in default  due to  non-payment  upon  maturity.  The  Managing
General  Partner had  previously  contacted the indenture  trustee and entered a
forbearance  agreement on October 28, 1999. In turn, the  Partnership  agreed to
(a) deliver to the indenture  trustee for the benefit of the note holders all of
the accumulated cash of the  Partnership,  less certain reserves and anticipated
operating  expenses,  (b) market all of its properties for sale, (c) deliver all
cash proceeds from any sales to the indenture  trustee until the notes are fully
satisfied and (d) comply with the reporting requirements under the indenture. At
the expiration of the  forbearance  period,  the Partnership had not sold all of
its properties or satisfied the Nonrecourse  Promissory  Notes. With the consent
of the  indenture  trustee,  the  forbearance  period was extended to August 31,
2001.  The sale of the  Partnership's  remaining  asset in October  2001 did not
generate  sufficient  proceeds to pay off the  Nonrecourse  Promissory  Notes in
full. The Managing General Partner is working with the debt trustee  regarding a
final payment to the noteholders.  Once this payment is made, the Partnership is
expected to terminate.

As a result of the  decision  to  liquidate  the  Partnership,  the  Partnership
changed its basis of  accounting  for its  financial  statements at December 31,
1999 to the  liquidation  basis of  accounting.  Consequently,  assets have been
valued at estimated net realizable  value and liabilities are presented at their
estimated   settlement   amounts.   The  valuation  of  assets  and  liabilities
necessarily  requires many estimates and  assumptions  and there are substantial
uncertainties in carrying out the liquidation.  The actual realization of assets
and  settlement of liabilities  could be higher or lower than amounts  indicated
and is based upon the Managing General Partner's estimates as of the date of the
financial statements.

During the three  months  ended March 31,  2002,  net  liabilities  decreased by
approximately $34,000. This decrease is primarily due to an increase in the debt
trustee  escrow offset by decreases in cash and cash  equivalents  and estimated
costs during the period of liquidation.  The increase in the debt trustee escrow
as well as the decrease in cash and cash  equivalents  is  primarily  due to the
transfer of excess cash from the  Partnership to the debt trustee.  The decrease
in the  estimated  costs during the period of  liquidation  is primarily  due to
three less months until liquidation.

During the three  months  ended March 31,  2001,  net  liabilities  decreased by
approximately $537,000. This decrease was primarily due to increases in the debt
trustee escrow and investment  properties  offset by a decrease in cash and cash
equivalents. The increase in investment properties was due to an increase in the
estimated fair market value of the investment  property owned by the Partnership
at that time. The decrease in cash and cash  equivalents as well as the increase
in the debt trustee escrow was primarily due to the transfer of excess cash from
the Partnership to the debt trustee.

Included in liabilities in the statement of net liabilities in liquidation as of
March 31,  2002 is  approximately  $39,000  of costs,  net of  income,  that the
Managing  General  Partner  estimates  will be  incurred  during  the  period of
liquidation  based  on the  assumption  that  the  liquidation  process  will be
completed by June 30, 2002. Because the success in realization of assets and the
settlement  of  liabilities  is based on the  Managing  General  Partner's  best
estimates,  the  liquidation  period may be shorter than  projected or it may be
extended beyond the projected period.

In light of the maturity of the Notes, no distributions were made to the limited
partners for the three months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO and its affiliates owned 3,950 limited  partnership units in
the Partnership representing 6.39% of the outstanding units at March 31, 2002. A
number of these units were  acquired  pursuant to tender offers made by AIMCO or
its affiliates. Under the Partnership Agreement,  unitholders holding a majority
of the Units are  entitled to take  action with  respect to a variety of matters
which would include voting on certain  amendments to the  Partnership  Agreement
and voting to remove the Managing General Partner. When voting on matters, AIMCO
would in all likelihood vote the Units it acquired in a manner  favorable to the
interest of the Managing  General Partner  because of its  affiliation  with the
Managing General Partner.

<PAGE>
                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purports  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class  of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  which are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc. ("Insignia") and entities which were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged  into AIMCO.  The  plaintiffs  seek  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
On June 25, 1998, the Managing General Partner filed a motion seeking  dismissal
of the action.  In lieu of responding  to the motion,  the  plaintiffs  filed an
amended  complaint.  The Managing General Partner filed demurrers to the amended
complaint which were heard February 1999.

Pending the ruling on such  demurrers,  settlement  negotiations  commenced.  On
November 2, 1999,  the parties  executed and filed a Stipulation  of Settlement,
settling claims, subject to court approval, on behalf of the Partnership and all
limited partners who owned units as of November 3, 1999. Preliminary approval of
the  settlement  was obtained on November 3, 1999 from the Court,  at which time
the Court set a final  approval  hearing for  December  10,  1999.  Prior to the
December  10,  1999  hearing,  the  Court  received  various  objections  to the
settlement, including a challenge to the Court's preliminary approval based upon
the alleged lack of authority of prior lead counsel to enter the settlement.  On
December 14, 1999, the Managing  General  Partner and its affiliates  terminated
the  proposed  settlement.  In  February  2000,  counsel  for some of the  named
plaintiffs filed a motion to disqualify plaintiff's lead and liaison counsel who
negotiated  the  settlement.  On June  27,  2000,  the  Court  entered  an order
disqualifying  them  from the case and an  appeal  was  taken  from the order on
October 5, 2000. On December 4, 2000, the Court  appointed the law firm of Lieff
Cabraser  Heimann & Bernstein  LLP as new lead  counsel for  plaintiffs  and the
putative class.  Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on January 19, 2001.
On March 2, 2001,  the  Managing  General  Partner  and its  affiliates  filed a
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On May 14, 2001,  the Court heard the
demurrer to the third amended  complaint.  On July 10, 2001, the Court issued an
order  sustaining  defendants'  demurrer on certain  grounds.  On July 20, 2001,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's July 10, 2001 order
granting in part and denying in part defendants' demurrer. On September 7, 2001,
Plaintiffs  filed a fourth amended class and  derivative  action  complaint.  On
September 12, 2001, the Court denied Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration.  On
October 5, 2001, the Managing General Partner and affiliated  defendants filed a
demurrer to the fourth amended complaint,  which was heard on December 11, 2001.
On February 2, 2002,  the Court served its order  granting in part the demurrer.
The  Court has  dismissed  without  leave to amend  certain  of the  plaintiffs'
claims.  On February 11, 2002,  plaintiffs  filed a motion  seeking to certify a
putative  class  comprised of all  non-affiliated  persons who own or have owned
units  in  the  partnerships.   The  Managing  General  Partner  and  affiliated
defendants oppose the motion. On April 29, 2002, the Court heard argument on the
motion and ordered  further  briefing  after which time the matter will be taken
under submission. The Court has set the matter for trial in January 2003.

During the third  quarter of 2001, a complaint  (the "Heller  action") was filed
against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,  captioned
Heller v. Insignia Financial Group. On or about August 6, 2001, plaintiffs filed
a first amended  complaint.  The first amended complaint in the Heller action is
brought as a purported  derivative  action,  and asserts  claims for among other
things  breach  of  fiduciary  duty;  unfair  competition;   conversion,  unjust
enrichment;  and judicial  dissolution.  Plaintiffs in the Nuanes action filed a
motion to  consolidate  the Heller action with the Nuanes action and stated that
the Heller action was filed in order to preserve the derivative claims that were
dismissed  without  leave to amend in the Nuanes action by the Court order dated
July 10, 2001. On October 5, 2001, the Managing  General  Partner and affiliated
defendants  moved to strike the first  amended  complaint  in its  entirety  for
violating  the Court's July 10, 2001 order  granting in part and denying in part
defendants'  demurrer in the Nuanes action, or alternatively,  to strike certain
portions of the complaint based on the statute of limitations.  Other defendants
in the action  demurred to the fourth  amended  complaint,  and,  alternatively,
moved to strike the complaint. On December 11, 2001, the court heard argument on
the motions  and took the matters  under  submission.  On February 4, 2002,  the
Court  served  notice of its order  granting  defendants'  motion to strike  the
Heller complaint as a violation of its July 10, 2001 order in the Nuanes action.
On March 27, 2002,  the plaintiffs  filed a notice  appealing the order striking
the complaint.

The Managing  General Partner does not anticipate that any costs,  whether legal
or  settlement  costs,  associated  with  these  cases will be  material  to the
Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 6.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a)    Exhibits:

                  None.

            b)    Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended March 31, 2002.
<PAGE>
                                   SIGNATURES


In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS III
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Martha L. Long
                                          Martha L. Long
                                          Senior Vice President
                                          and Controller


                                    Date: