alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 929.98

 929.45

 928.99

 928.47

 927.66

 926.95

 926.37

 925.72

 924.49

 924.04

 923.66

 923.24

 922.74

 922.35

 921.91

 921.55

 921.15

 920.81

 920.61

 920.12

 919.77

 919.36

 919.08

 918.77

 918.45

 918.19

 917.86

 917.58

 917.28

 917.04

 1,565.9

 1,558.2

 1,551.5

 1,544.0

 1,532.3

 1,522.1

 1,513.8

 1,504.6

 1,487.1

 1,480.8

 1,475.5

 1,469.6

 1,462.6

 1,457.2

 1,451.1

 1,446.1

 1,440.6

 1,435.9

 1,433.2

 1,426.4

 1,421.6

 1,416.0

 1,412.2

 1,407.9

 1,403.6

 1,400.0

 1,395.6

 1,391.8

 1,387.7

 1,384.5

STORAGE

-4.8

-7.7

-6.7

-7.5

-11.7

-10.2

-8.3

-9.3

-17.4

-6.3

-5.3

-5.9

-7.0

-5.4

-6.1

-5.0

-5.5

-4.7

-2.7

-6.7

-4.8

-5.6

-3.8

-4.2

-4.4

-3.5

-4.5

-3.8

-4.1

-3.2

CHANGE

 3,879

 2,847

 3,445

 2,684

 955

 1,234

 1,885

 1,256

-2,928

 2,349

 2,756

 2,802

 2,165

 2,817

 2,467

 2,894

 2,716

 2,832

 3,575

 2,023

 2,428

 2,568

 2,856

 2,610

 2,453

 2,708

 2,672

 2,798

 2,711

 3,144

INFLOW

 6,125

 6,612

 6,679

 6,350

 6,706

 6,252

 5,873

 5,761

 5,703

 5,385

 5,391

 5,590

 5,560

 5,437

 5,439

 5,296

 5,372

 5,082

 4,882

 5,317

 4,787

 5,321

 4,691

 4,641

 4,569

 4,393

 4,834

 4,612

 4,657

 4,685

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 193

 129

 145

 128

 144

 127

 189

 163

 145

 162

 50

 177

 123

 115

 110

 106

 130

 110

 77

 97

 60

 80

 100

 100

 80

 100

 96

 95

 99

 95

C.F.S.

 .45

 .30

 .34

 .30

 .34

 .30

 .45

 .39

 .35

 .39

 .12

 .43

 .30

 .28

 .27

 .26

 .32

 .27

 .19

 .24

 .15

 .20

 .25

 .25

 .20

 .25

 .24

 .24

 .25

 .24

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2008 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: October 1, 2008

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -186.1 71,601 162,002 0 0 3,525 8.56 .00

ACRE-FEET -186,100 142,021 321,331 0 0 6,992

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 321,331

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 321,331

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2008 .00

 1,570.8
Exhibt 10.25 SECONDAMENDMENTTO THENEW YORKSTOCK EXCHANGE, INC.SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN WHEREAS, New York
Stock Exchange, Inc. (the Exchange) maintains the New York Stock Exchange,
Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated effective as
of June 1, 1999 and as thereafter amended (the Plan); WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 22 of the Plan, the Exchange reserves the right to amend the Plan upon
the terms and conditions therein set forth; and WHEREAS, the Exchange
desires to amend the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
amended, effective April 1, 2004, as follows: 1.The word Chairman in Section 1.12 and 2(d) of the Plan is
replaced with the words Chairman or the Chief Executive Officer. 2.Section 4(b) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read
as follows: (b)           The Chairman or the Chief Executive
Officer of the NYSE may waive any of the requirements enumerated under
paragraph (a) above with respect to any Participant who incurs a Termination of
NYSE Employment at the initiation of the NYSE, as determined in the sole
discretion of the Chairman or Chief Executive Officer, provided, however, that
any such waiver with respect to the Chairman or the Chief Executive Officer of
the NYSE may only be made by the Human Resources Policy and Compensation Committee
of the Board and any waiver made by the Chairman or the Chief Executive Officer
of the NYSE must be promptly communicated to the Human Resources Policy and
Compensation Committee of the Board.  Any
waiver pursuant to this paragraph shall only be effective if made in writing. IN WITNESS
WHEREOF,the Exchange has caused this
Amendment to be executed this 2nd
day of April, 2004. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.By
  /s/Dale B. Bernstein  ATTEST: /s/Darla C. Stuckey
### §290h–9. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–167, title II, Nov. 21, 1989, 103 Stat. 1209

Section, Pub. L. 96–533, title V, §511, Dec. 16, 1980, 94 Stat. 3155; Pub. L. 99–83, title VIII, §810(b), Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 264, related to expiration of authority of Foundation.
Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness

Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness

Gospel-Hump Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Rackliff - Gedney

East Meadow Creek

Rapid River

Gospel Hump

West Meadow Creek

Mallard

Big Canyon Idaho

Klopton Creek - Corral Creek

Clear Creek

Silver Creek - Pilot Knob

Little Slate Creek

O'Hara - Falls Creek

John Day

Salmon Face

Lick Point

New - West Fork Crooked River

Dixie Summit - Nut Hill North Fork Slate Creek

Little Slate Creek North

Selway Bitterroot

Adjacent to Gospel Hump Wilderness

£¤12

£¤95

¬«14

¬«62

¬«3

¬«11

¬«13

¬«55

¬«8

¬«7

¬«64

¬«8

Fenn

Peck

Lardo

Dixie

Greer

McCall

Cuprum

Warren

Lucile

Stites

Kamiah

Weippe

Pierce Lenore

Helmer

Meadows

Pollock

Riggins

Kooskia

Reubens

Orofino

Gifford

Burgdorf

Elk City

Harpster

Glenwood

Culdesac

Kendrick

Lake Fork

Fruitvale

Big Creek

Ferdinand

Craigmont

Elk River

White Bird

Cottonwood

Winchester

Grangeville

Headquarters

Red River Hot Springs

Management Themes Applied to Idaho Roadless Areas

Wild Land Recreation

Primitive

Backcountry/Restoration

General Forest , Rangeland and Grassland

Forest Plan Special Areas

Wilderness

National Forest System Lands

(Other ownership is not displayed)

Nez Perce/Wallowa-Whitman Existing Plan Management Themes

10 5 0 10 I Miles

The USDA Forest Service uses the most current and complete

data available. GIS Data and product accuracy may vary.

Using GIS products for puposes other than those for which they

were intended may yield inaccurate or misleading results.

The USDA Forest Service reserves the right to correct, update,

modify, or replace GIS products without notification.
§ 404.1593 Medical evidence in continuing disability review cases. ( a ) *General.* If you are entitled to benefits or if a period of disability has been established for you because you are disabled, we will have your case file with the supporting medical evidence previously used to establish or continue your entitlement. Generally, therefore, the medical evidence we will need for a continuing disability review will be that required to make a current determination or decision as to whether you are still disabled, as defined under the medical improvement review standard. See §§ 404.1579 and 404.1594.
( b ) *Obtaining evidence from your medical sources.* You must provide us with reports from your physician, psychologist, or others who have treated or evaluated you, as well as any other evidence that will help us determine if you are still disabled. See § 404.1512. You must have a good reason for not giving us this information or we may find that your disability has ended. See § 404.1594(e)(2). If we ask you, you must contact your medical sources to help us get the medical reports. We will make every reasonable effort to help you in getting medical reports when you give us permission to request them from your physician, psychologist, or other medical sources. See § 404.1512(d)(1) concerning what we mean by every reasonable effort. In some instances, such as when a source is known to be unable to provide certain tests or procedures or is known to be nonproductive or uncooperative, we may order a consultative examination while awaiting receipt of medical source evidence. Before deciding that your disability has ended, we will develop a complete medical history covering at least the 12 months preceding the date you sign a report about your continuing disability status. See § 404.1512(c).
( c ) *When we will purchase a consultative examination.* A consultative examination may be purchased when we need additional evidence to determine whether or not your disability continues. As a result, we may ask you, upon our request and reasonable notice, to undergo consultative examinations and tests to help us determine if you are still disabled. See § 404.1517. We will decide whether or not to purchase a consultative examination in accordance with the standards in §§ 404.1519a through 404.1519b.
[56 FR 36962, Aug. 1, 1991]
### §2273. Peace process in Central America

The Congress—

(1) strongly supports the initiatives taken by the Contadora group and the resulting Document of Objectives which has been agreed to by Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua and which sets forth a framework for negotiating a peaceful settlement to the conflict and turmoil in the region; and

(2) finds that the United States should provide such assistance and support as may be appropriate in helping to reach comprehensive and verifiable final agreements, based on the Document of Objectives, which will ensure peaceful and enduring solutions to the Central American conflicts.

(Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §463, as added Pub. L. 99–83, title VII, §701, Aug. 8, 1985, 99 Stat. 235.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Another section 463 of Pub. L. 87–195 is classified to section 2283 of this title.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.225 Post-acceptance requirements for herding and range livestock. ( a ) Unless otherwise specified in this section, the requirements for recruiting U.S. workers by the employer and SWA must be satisfied, as specified in §§ 655.150 through 655.158.
( b ) Pursuant to § 655.150(b), where a single job order is approved for an agricultural association filing as a joint employer on behalf of its employer-members with different first dates of need, each of the SWAs to which the job order was transmitted by the CO or the SWA having jurisdiction over the location of the agricultural association must keep the job order on its active file the end of the recruitment period, as set forth in § 655.135(d), has elapsed for all employer-members identified on the job order, and must refer to the agricultural association each qualified U.S. worker who applies (or on whose behalf an application is made) for the job opportunity.
( c ) Any eligible U.S. worker who applies (or on whose behalf an application is made) for the job opportunity and is hired will be placed at the location nearest to them absent a request for a different location by the U.S. worker. Employers must make reasonable efforts to accommodate such placement requests by the U.S. worker.
( d ) An agricultural association that fulfills the recruitment requirements for its employer-members is required to maintain a written recruitment report containing the information required by § 655.156 for each individual employer-member identified in the application or job order, including any approved modifications.
#### Hyman Marklowitch, Respondent, v. Braine Goodfriend, Appellant.

Motion denied. Present — Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,781,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,398,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   306,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,363,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,570,000
<PP&E>                                     113,090,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,519,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             121,158,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,128,000
<BONDS>                                     67,594,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,979,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               121,158,000
<SALES>                                      9,995,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,812,000
<CGS>                                        7,021,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,502,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,268,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,030,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   403,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            411,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                153,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
#### Wilford Standiford, Sheriff, v. M. H. Green & Company.

Filed February 17, 1898.

No. 7774.

Trial: Jury: Violation oe Instructions. It is the duty of the jury to find a verdict according to the law as given in the instructions of the court. When they clearly violate this duty, the court should set aside the verdict. *(Aultmcm v. Reams,*9 Neb. 487.)

Error from the district court of Antelope, county. Tried below before Robinson, J.

*Reversed.*

*R. R. Dickson*and *N. D. Jackson,*for plaintiff in error.

*M. F. Harrington*and *John H. Mosier, contra.*

Irvine, C.

One W. A. Westfall was formerly engaged in the mercantile business at Butte, in Boyd county, and being indebted to M. H. Green & Co., he executed to them a chattel mortgage on his stock of goods, ostensibly made to secure notes evidencing that indebtedness. The goods were then attached by Standiford, who was sheriff, at the suit of other creditors of Westfall, and Green & Co. replevied. By agreement of the parties the cause was transferred to Antelope county for trial. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

Among the instructions was one given at the request of the defendant, to the effect that if at the time the mortgage was given the plaintiffs and Westfall secretly agreed that possession was to be taken of the goods, that plaintiffs should sell sufficient to satisfy their own claim, and thereafter continue to sell and apply the proceeds to the payment of other debts of Westfall; or if there was a secret agreement that the property left after paying plaintiffs’ claim was to be held by them for the benefit of Westfall’s creditors, then the mortgage was void and the jury should find for the defendant. No exception lyas *11taken to the instruction. Westfall and his wife both testified that the mortgage was given in pursuance of such an agreement as was outlined in the instruction, and their testimony on this subject is not contradicted. We need not inquire whether the instruction was correct in law. It was given, and it was the duty of the jury to obey it. The verdict was renden d in manifest disregard of the instruction, and is for that reason contrary to law. In *Aultman v. Reams,*9 Neb. 487, the court said: “Whether right or wrong, it was the duty of the jury to respect and obey the instructions of the court, and for their failure to do so the verdict should have been set aside; and it was error for the district court to refuse to do so.” And in *Omaha & R. V. R. Co. v. Hall,*33 Neb. 229, the following language was used: “It is not necessary to decide, nor do I, whether the law is correctly given in said instructions. It is the duty of the jury in all cases to follow the instructions given them in charge by the court, and if they do not do so, the verdict should be set aside and a new-trial ordered.”

Reversed and remanded.
### §3968a. Locally-employed staff wages

#### (a) Market-responsive staff wages

Not later than 180 days after December 16, 2016, and every 3 years thereafter, the Secretary shall establish and implement a prevailing wage rates goal for positions in the local compensation plan, as described in section 3968 of this title, at each diplomatic post that—

(1) is based on the specific recruiting and retention needs of each such post and local labor market conditions, as determined annually; and

(2) is not less than the 50th percentile of the prevailing wage for comparable employment in the labor market surrounding each such post.

#### (b) Exception

The prevailing wage rate goal established under subsection (a) shall not apply if compliance with such subsection would be inconsistent with applicable United States law, the law in the locality of employment, or the public interest.

#### (c) Recordkeeping requirement

The analytical assumptions underlying the calculation of wage levels at each diplomatic post under subsection (a), and the data upon which such calculation is based—

(1) shall be filed electronically and retained for not less than 5 years; and

(2) shall be made available to the appropriate congressional committees upon request.

(Pub. L. 114–323, title IV, §401, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1926; Pub. L. 118–31, div. F, title LXII, §6226(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 980.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of State Authorities Act, Fiscal Year 2017, and not as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2023—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 118–31 substituted "every 3 years" for "periodically" in introductory provisions.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

For definitions of "Secretary" and "appropriate congressional committees" as used in this section, see section 2 of Pub. L. 114–323, set out as a note under section 2651 of this title.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 (the
Report) of Immucor, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|                |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                         
|--------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|                |  |  |  | 
|                |  |  | 
|January 8, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Richard A. Flynt
|                |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Richard A. Flynt Chief Financial
Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 15,329

 15,486

 15,508

 15,217

 13,990

 11,982

 11,070

 9,667

 11,095

 12,775

 12,630

 10,708

 12,251

 11,578

 13,423

 10,091

 0

 0

 12,745

 13,320

 9,733

 11,565

 12,230

 13,832

 15,393

 16,480

 17,539

 17,480

 17,409

 16,197

 13,428

 5,463

 4,244

 4,736

 5,190

 4,278

 4,410

 2,993

 3,440

 5,133

 5,307

 5,367

 4,860

 4,600

 3,910

 4,303

 1,982

 0

 0

 10,104

 4,967

 4,007

 4,146

 5,041

 5,782

 6,069

 6,391

 6,533

 5,845

 5,574

 6,099

 5,626

 8,992

 8,684

 9,280

 9,274

 8,468

 7,094

 5,809

 6,512

 7,844

 8,204

 8,008

 7,810

 7,509

 7,562

 8,493

 7,283

 0

 0

 11,228

 8,551

 7,111

 7,414

 8,021

 8,783

 9,752

 10,659

 11,015

 10,427

 10,804

 10,833

 9,621

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 23.2





ALBERT WONG & CO.


CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


7th Floor, Nan Dao Commercial Building


359-361 Queen’s Road Central


Hong Kong


Tel : 2851 7954


Fax: 2545 4086





ALBERT WONG


B. Soc., Sc., LL.B., P.C.LL., Barrister-at-law, C.P.A. (Practising).





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-167276 and File No. 333-171728) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-172922 and File No. 333-165801) of Shengkai Innovations, Inc., of our report dated September 26, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Shengkai Innovations, Inc., as of June 30, 2011 and for the year then ended, which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K.





Respectfully submitted,





/s/ Albert Wong & Co.





ALBERT WONG & CO.


Certified Public Accountants





Hong Kong


September 26, 2011
**Exhibit
      32**





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Star Maritime Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Prokopios (Akis) Tsirigakis, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer) and I, George Syllantavos, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
      Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      our knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.






Signed
      on
      this 14thday of March, 2007






/s/
      Prokopios (Akis) Tsirigakis   Prokopios
      (Akis) Tsirigakis






/s/
      George Syllantavos


George
      Syllantavos





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form
      10-K
      or as a separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 420

 388

 339

 353

 328

 283

 328

 538

 772

 931

 707

 672

 562

 568

 579

 505

 347

 271

 241

 285

 305

 387

 376

 446

 525

 763

 647

 431

 380

 286

 338

 158

 158

 160

 161

 161

 162

 163

 164

 164

 166

 170

 162

 161

 162

 159

 159

 155

 152

 149

 148

 145

 147

 144

 143

 138

 140

 141

 138

 136

 136

 137

 201

 192

 204

 199

 199

 185

 195

 216

 273

 307

 254

 236

 216

 221

 256

 248

 203

 174

 164

 173

 176

 201

 184

 190

 206

 260

 221

 203

 187

 169

 163

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 14, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER