Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Notices 2511 

For Further Information or To Submit 

Comments Contact: Barry S. Lineback, 

Telephone: (703) 603–7740, Fax: (703) 

603–0655, or e-mail 

CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov. 

Barry S. Lineback, 

Director, Business Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–644 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket No. DoD–2009–HA–0137 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

ACTION: Notice. 

The Department of Defense has 

submitted to OMB for clearance, the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by February 16, 

2010. 

Title and OMB Number: An Outcome 

Evaluation of the SOS Suicide 

Prevention Program; OMB Control 

Number 0720–TBD. 

Type of Request: New. 

Number of respondents: 399. 

Responses Per Respondent: 2. 

Annual Responses: 798. 

Average Burden Per Response: 1 

Hour. 

Annual Burden Hours: 798 hours. 

Needs and Uses: The information 

collection requirement is necessary to 

evaluate the effectiveness of the SOS 

Suicide Prevention Program which is 

used as suicide prevention 

programming in middle and high 

schools throughout the country. The 

surveys are completed in school and 

then returned to the University of 

Connecticut’s Institute for Public Health 

Research for analysis. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Frequency: Semi-annually. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer. 

Written comments and 

recommendations on the proposed 

information collection should be sent to 

Mr. Kraemer at the Office of 

Management and Budget, Desk Officer 

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

You may also submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by the following method: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, docket 

number and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia 

Toppings. 

Written requests for copies of the 

information collection proposal should 

be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ 

Information Management Division, 1777 

North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, 

Arlington, VA 22209–2133. 

Dated: January 6, 2010. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2010–596 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket No. DoD–2008–HA–0019] 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

ACTION: Notice. 

The Department of Defense has 

submitted to OMB for clearance, the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). 

DATES: Consideration will be given to all 

comments received by February 16, 

2010. 

Title and OMB Number: TRICARE 

Dual Eligible Fiscal Intermediary 

(TDEFIC) Provider Satisfaction Survey, 

OMB Control Number 0720–TBD. 

Type of Request: New. 

Number of Respondents: 46,800. 

Responses Per Respondent: 1. 

Annual Responses: 46,800. 

Average Burden Per Response: 15 

minutes. 

Annual Burden Hours: 11,700 hours. 

Needs and Uses: The survey 

Wisconsin Physician Services (WPS) is 

to administer is a contract requirement 

that the Government has accepted and 

paid for as part of the contract award. 

This survey is conducted on a monthly 

basis, and the sample will be drawn 

from all providers that have had a claim 

processed in the previous week and 

therefore is not limited to just Network 

Providers. WPS will use the survey to 

assess provider satisfaction, attitudes, 

and perceptions regarding the claims 

processing and customer services 

provided by WPS for the TDEFIC in 

order to improve internal operations 

and customer services to increase 

provider satisfaction. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households; Business or other for profit; 

Federal government. 

Frequency: Monthly. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Mr. John Kraemer. 

Written comments and 

recommendations on the proposed 

information collection should be sent to 

Mr. Kraemer at the Office of 

Management and Budget, Desk Officer 

for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive 

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. 

You may also submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by the following method: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name, docket 

number and title for this Federal 

Register document. The general policy 

for comments and other submissions 

from members of the public is to make 

these submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia 

Toppings. 

Written requests for copies of the 

information collection proposal should 

be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/ 

Information Management Division, 1777 

North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, 

Arlington, VA 22209–2133. 

Dated: January 6, 2010. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2010–597 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Manual for Courts-Martial; Proposed 

Amendments 

AGENCY: Joint Service Committee on 

Military Justice (JSC). 

ACTION: Notice of Public Response to 

Proposed Amendments to the Manual 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2512 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Notices 

for Courts-Martial, United States (2008 

ed.) (MCM). 

SUMMARY: The JSC is forwarding final 

proposed amendments to the MCM to 

the Department of Defense. The 

proposed changes constitute the 2009 

annual review required by the MCM and 

DoD Directive 5500.17, ‘‘Role and 

Responsibilities of the Joint Service 

Committee (JSC) on Military Justice,’’ 

May 3, 2003. The proposed changes 

concern the rules of procedure and 

evidence and the punitive articles 

applicable in trials by courts-martial. 

These proposed changes have not been 

coordinated within the Department of 

Defense under DoD Directive 5500.1, 

‘‘Preparation, Processing and 

Coordinating Legislation, Executive 

Orders, Proclamations, Views Letters 

Testimony,’’ June 15, 2007, and do not 

constitute the official position of the 

Department of Defense, the Military 

Departments, or any other Government 

agency. 

ADDRESSES: Comments and materials 

received from the public are available 

for inspection or copying at the Office 

of the Judge Advocate General, Criminal 

Law Division (Code 20), 1254 Charles 

Morris Street, SE., Suite B01, 

Washington Navy Yard, District of 

Columbia between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

Holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lieutenant Commander Stacia 

Gawronski, Executive Secretary, Joint 

Service Committee on Military Justice, 

1254 Charles Morris Street, SE., Suite 

B01, Washington Navy Yard, District of 

Columbia 20374, (202) 685–7683, (202) 

685–7084 fax. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On 17 September 2009, the JSC 

published a notice of Proposed 

Amendments to the Manual for CourtsMartial and a Notice of Public Meeting 

to receive comments on these proposals. 

The public meeting was held on 29 

October 2009. One individual 

representing an organization spoke at 

the public meeting to announce that the 

organization would be submitting 

written comments. One individual and 

one organization submitted comments 

through the Federal Register electronic 

bulletin board. 

Discussion of Comments and Changes 

The JSC considered the public 

comments and decided to modify the 

proposed addition of a paragraph 

addressing child pornography under 

Article 134 in Part IV of the MCM. The 

JSC is satisfied the other proposed 

amendments are appropriate to 

implement without modification. The 

JSC will forward the public comments 

and proposed amendments to the 

Department of Defense. 

The public comments regarding the 

proposed changes follow: 

a. Recommended that the proposed 

‘Child pornography’ addition to Article 

134, UCMJ, should be broadened to 

include the female breast. The JSC 

considered that broadening the 

definition in this way would be over 

inclusive and did not want to 

unintentionally criminalize conduct or 

depictions not sexual in nature (for 

example, a picture of a baby in the 

bath). 

b. Opined the proposed change to 

Military Rule of Evidence (M.R.E.) 504 

regarding spousal privilege does not 

seem to limit the privilege in a logical 

manner. For example, if a husband and 

wife both provided illegal drugs to a 12- 

year-old, the spouses would not be 

allowed to invoke their privilege against 

testifying against each other. However, 

if the wife was engaged in a sexual 

relationship with the same non-relative, 

12-year-old (and not acting in loco 

parentis), and the wife told the husband 

about the relationship, the marital 

privilege would remain intact. The JSC 

considered that adultery is a crime 

against the person of the other spouse 

for purposes of M.R.E. 504(c)(2)(A) 

under U.S. v. Taylor, 64 M.J. 416 

(C.A.A.F. 2007), and therefore, the 

marital privilege would not remain 

intact in the second example given. 

c. Raised several concerns regarding 

the adequacy of the rule-making process 

itself. The JSC considered these 

concerns and determined that the 

rulemaking process is adequate, satisfies 

statutory requirements, and provides 

meaningful opportunity for public 

participation. 

Proposed Amendments After Period for 

Public Comment 

The proposed recommended 

amendments to the Manual for CourtsMartial to be forwarded through the 

DoD for action by Executive Order of the 

President of the United States are as 

follows: 

Section 1. Part III of the Manual for 

Courts-Martial, United States, is 

amended as follows: 

(a) M.R.E. 504 (c)(2)(D) is added to 

read as follows: 

‘‘(D) Where both parties have been 

substantial participants in illegal 

activity, those communications between 

the spouses during the marriage 

regarding the illegal activity in which 

they have jointly participated are not 

marital communications for purposes of 

the privilege in subdivision (b), and are 

not entitled to protection under the 

privilege in subdivision (b).’’ 

(b) The following amendments 

conform M.R.E. 609 to F.R.E. 609: 

(1) M.R.E. 609 (a) is amended to 

substitute the words ‘‘character for 

truthfulness’’ for the word ‘‘credibility.’’ 

(2) M.R.E. 609 (a)(2) is amended to 

substitute the words ‘‘regardless of the 

punishment, if it readily can be 

determined that establishing the 

elements of the crime required proof or 

admission of an act of dishonesty or 

false statement by the witness’’ for the 

words ‘‘if it involved dishonesty or false 

statement, regardless of the 

punishment.’’ 

(3) M.R.E. 609 (c) is amended to 

substitute the words ‘‘a subsequent 

crime that was punishable by death, 

dishonorable discharge, or 

imprisonment in excess of one year’’ for 

the words ‘‘a subsequent crime which 

was punishable by death, dishonorable 

discharge, or imprisonment in excess of 

one year.’’ 

Section 2. Part IV of the Manual for 

Courts-Martial, United States, is 

amended as follows: 

(a) Paragraph 13, Article 89, 

Disrespect toward a superior 

commissioned officer, paragraph c.(1) is 

amended to substitute the words 

‘‘uniformed service’’ for ‘‘armed forces’’ 

everywhere the words ‘‘armed forces’’ 

appear in that paragraph. This change is 

made to clarify that the uniformed 

officers of the Public Health Service and 

the National Oceanographic and 

Atmospheric Administration, when 

assigned to and serving with the armed 

forces, are included in the definition of 

a superior commissioned officer. 

(b) A clerical amendment is made to 

Paragraph 35, Article 111, Drunken or 

reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft or 

vessel, paragraph f to read as follows: 

‘‘(f) Sample Specification. 

In that ____ (personal jurisdiction 

data), did (at/on board—location) 

(subject matter jurisdiction data, if 

required), on or about ____, 20__, (in the 

motor pool area) (near the Officer’s 

Club) (at the intersection of ____ and 

____) (while in the Gulf of Mexico) 

(while in flight over North America) 

physically control [a vehicle, to wit: (a 

truck) (a passenger car) (____)] [an 

aircraft, to wit: (an AH–64 helicopter) 

(an F–14A fighter) (a KC–135 tanker) 

(____)] [a vessel, to wit: (the aircraft 

carrier USS ____ (the Coast Guard Cutter 

____) (____)], [while drunk] [while 

impaired by ____] [while the alcohol 

concentration in his (blood or breath) 

equaled or exceeded the applicable limit 

under subparagraph (b) of the text of the 

statute in paragraph 35 as shown by 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Notices 2513 

chemical analysis] [in a (reckless) 

(wanton) manner by (attempting to pass 

another vehicle on a sharp curve) (by 

ordering that the aircraft be flown below 

the authorized altitude)] [and did 

thereby cause said (vehicle) (aircraft) 

(vessel) to (strike and) (injure____)].’’ 

(c) A clerical amendment is made to 

Paragraph 48, Article 123, Forgery, 

paragraph c.(4) to add the word ‘‘to’’ 

after the word ‘‘liability’’ the second time 

it appears in the fifth sentence. 

(d) Paragraph 68b. is added as 

follows: 

‘‘68b. Article 134—(Child 

pornography) 

a. Text. See paragraph 60. 

b. Elements. 

(1) Possessing, receiving, or viewing 

child pornography. 

(a) That the accused knowingly and 

wrongfully possessed, received or 

viewed child pornography; and 

(b) That under the circumstances, the 

conduct of the accused was to the 

prejudice of good order and discipline 

in the armed forces or was of a nature 

to bring discredit upon the armed 

forces. 

(2) Possessing child pornography with 

intent to distribute. 

(a) That the accused knowingly and 

wrongfully possessed child 

pornography; 

(b) That the possession was with the 

intent to distribute; and 

(c) That under the circumstances, the 

conduct of the accused was to the 

prejudice of good order and discipline 

in the armed forces or was of a nature 

to bring discredit upon the armed 

forces. 

(3) Distributing child pornography. 

(a) That the accused knowingly and 

wrongfully distributed child 

pornography to another; and 

(b) That under the circumstances, the 

conduct of the accused was to the 

prejudice of good order and discipline 

in the armed forces or was of a nature 

to bring discredit upon the armed 

forces. 

(4) Producing child pornography. 

(a) That the accused knowingly and 

wrongfully produced child 

pornography; and 

(b) That under the circumstances, the 

conduct of the accused was to the 

prejudice of good order and discipline 

in the armed forces or was of a nature 

to bring discredit upon the armed 

forces. 

c. Explanation. 

(1) ‘‘Child Pornography’’ means any 

visual depiction of a minor, or what 

appears to be a minor, engaging in 

sexually explicit conduct, even if the 

minor depicted was not an actual 

person or did not actually exist. 

(2) An accused may not be convicted 

of possessing, receiving, viewing, 

distributing, or producing child 

pornography, if he was not aware that 

the images were of minors, or what 

appeared to be minors, engaged in 

sexually explicit conduct. Awareness 

may be inferred from circumstantial 

evidence such as the name of a 

computer file or folder, the name of the 

host Web site from which a visual 

depiction was viewed or received, 

search terms used, and the number of 

images possessed. 

(3) ‘‘Distributing’’ means delivering to 

the actual or constructive possession of 

another. 

(4) ‘‘Minor’’ means any person under 

the age of 18 years; 

(5) ‘‘Possessing’’ means exercising 

control of something. Possession may be 

direct physical custody like holding an 

item in one’s hand, or it may be 

constructive, as in the case of a person 

who hides something in a locker or a car 

to which that person may return to 

retrieve it. Possession must be knowing 

and conscious. Possession inherently 

includes the power or authority to 

preclude control by others. It is possible 

for more than one person to possess an 

item simultaneously, as when several 

people share control over an item. 

(6) ‘‘Producing’’ means creating or 

manufacturing. As used in this 

paragraph, it refers to making child 

pornography that did not previously 

exist. It does not include reproducing or 

copying. 

(7) ‘‘Sexually explicit conduct’’ means 

actual or simulated: 

(a) Sexual intercourse or sodomy, 

including genital-genital, oral-genital, 

anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether 

between persons of the same or opposite 

sex; 

(b) Bestiality; 

(c) Masturbation; 

(d) Sadistic or masochistic abuse; or 

(e) Lascivious exhibition of the 

genitals or pubic area of any person. 

(8) ‘‘Visual depiction’’ includes any 

developed or undeveloped photograph, 

picture, film or video; any digital or 

computer image, picture, film or video 

made by any means, including those 

transmitted by any means including 

streaming media, even if not stored in 

a permanent format; or any digital or 

electronic data capable of conversion 

into a visual image. 

(9) ‘‘Wrongfulness.’’ Any facts or 

circumstances which show that a visual 

depiction of child pornography was 

unintentionally or inadvertently 

acquired are relevant to wrongfulness, 

including, but not limited to, the 

method by which the visual depiction 

was acquired, the length of time the 

visual depiction was maintained, and 

whether the visual depiction was 

promptly, and in good faith, destroyed 

or reported to law enforcement. 

(10) On motion of the government, in 

any prosecution under this paragraph, 

except for good cause shown, the name, 

address, social security number, or other 

nonphysical identifying information, 

other than the age or approximate age, 

of any minor who is depicted in any 

child pornography or visual depiction 

or copy thereof shall not be admissible 

and may be redacted from any otherwise 

admissible evidence, and the panel shall 

be instructed, upon request of the 

Government, that it can draw no 

inference from the absence of such 

evidence. 

d. Lesser included offenses. 

(1) Possessing, receiving, or viewing 

child pornography 

Article 80—attempts 

(2) Possessing child pornography with 

intent to distribute 

Article 80—attempts 

Article 134—possessing child 

pornography 

(3) Distributing child pornography 

Article 80—attempts 

Article 134—possessing child 

pornography 

Article 134—possessing child 

pornography with intent to 

distribute 

(4) Producing child pornography 

Article 80—attempts 

Article 134—possessing child 

pornography 

e. Maximum punishment. 

(1) Possessing, receiving or viewing 

child pornography. Dishonorable 

discharge, forfeiture of all pay and 

allowances, and confinement for 10 

years. 

(2) Possessing child pornography with 

intent to distribute. Dishonorable 

discharge, forfeiture of all pay and 

allowances, and confinement for 15 

years. 

(3) Distributing child pornography. 

Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all 

pay and allowances, and confinement 

for 20 years. 

(4) Producing child pornography. 

Dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all 

pay and allowances, and confinement 

for 30 years. 

f. Sample specification. Possessing, 

receiving, viewing, possessing with 

intent to distribute, distributing or 

producing child pornography. 

In that ___ (personal jurisdiction 

data), did, at ___, on or about ___ 

knowingly and wrongfully (possess) 

(receive) (view) (distribute) (produce) 

child pornography, to wit: a 

(photograph) (picture) (film) (video) 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
2514 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 10 / Friday, January 15, 2010 / Notices 

(digital image) (computer image) of a 

minor, or what appears to be a minor, 

engaging in sexually explicit conduct(, 

with intent to distribute the said child 

pornography).’’ 

Section 3. These amendments shall 

take effect 30 days from the date of this 

order. 

(a) Nothing in these amendments 

shall be construed to make punishable 

any act done or omitted prior to the 

effective date of this order that was not 

punishable when done or omitted. 

(b) Nothing in these amendments 

shall be construed to invalidate any 

nonjudicial punishment proceedings, 

restraint, investigation, referral of 

charges, trial in which arraignment 

occurred, or other action begun prior to 

the effective date of this order, and any 

such nonjudicial punishment, restraint, 

investigation, referral of charges, trial, or 

other action may proceed in the same 

manner and with the same effect as if 

these amendments had not been 

prescribed. 

The White House 

Changes to the Discussion 

Accompanying the Manual for Courts 

Martial, United States 

(a) A clerical amendment is made to 

the first paragraph of the Discussion 

following R.C.M. 1107(d)(1) to correctly 

reference R.C.M. 1003(b)(5) and (6) 

instead of R.C.M. 1003(b)(6) and (7). 

Dated: December 18, 2009. 

Patricia L. Toppings, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2010–600 Filed 1–14–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket ID: DOD–2010–OS–0003] 

Privacy Act of 1974; System of 

Records 

AGENCY: National Security Agency/ 

Central Security Service, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice to amend a system of 

records. 

SUMMARY: The National Security 

Agency/Central Security Service is 

proposing to amend a system of records 

notice in its existing inventory of record 

systems subject to the Privacy Act of 

1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

DATES: This proposed action will be 

effective without further notice on 

February 16, 2010 unless comments are 

received which result in a contrary 

determination. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by docket number and title, 

by any of the following methods: 

* Federal Rulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

* Mail: Federal Docket Management 

System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon, 

Washington, DC 20301–1160. 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

docket number for this Federal Register 

document. The general policy for 

comments and other submissions from 

members of the public is to make these 

submissions available for public 

viewing on the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov as they are 

received without change, including any 

personal identifiers or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Anne Hill at (301) 688–6527. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

National Security Agency/Central 

Security Service systems of records 

notices subject to the Privacy Act of 

1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have 

been published in the Federal Register 

and are available from the contact above 

(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). 

The specific change to the records 

system being amended is set forth below 

followed by the notice, as amended, 

published in its entirety. The proposed 

amendment is not within the purview of 

subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 

(5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which 

requires the submission of a new or 

altered system report. 

Dated: January 12, 2010. 

Mitchell S. Bryman, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

GNSA 09 

SYSTEM NAME: 

NSA/CSS Personnel File (January 7, 

2009; 74 FR 698). 

CHANGES: 

* * * * * 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

Delete entry and replace with 

‘‘National Security Agency Act of 1959, 

Public Law 86–36, (codified at 50 U.S.C. 

402); 5 U.S.C. and certain implementing 

Office of Personnel Management 

regulations contained within 5 CFR part 

293, Personnel Records; 10 U.S.C. 1124, 

Cash awards for disclosures, 

suggestions, inventions, and scientific 

achievements; 44 U.S.C. 3101, Records 

management by agency heads; general 

duties and E.O. 9397 (SSN), as 

amended.’’ 

* * * * * 

GNSA 09 

SYSTEM NAME: 

NSA/CSS Personnel File. 

SYSTEM LOCATION: 

Primary location: National Security 

Agency/Central Security Service, Ft. 

George G. Meade, MD 20755–6000. 

Decentralized segments: Each staff, 

line, contract and field element and 

supervisor as authorized and 

appropriate. 

CATEGORIES OF INDIVIDUALS COVERED BY THE

SYSTEM: 

Civilian employees, personnel under 

contract, military assignees, dependents 

of NSA/CSS personnel assigned to field 

elements, individuals integrated into the 

cryptologic reserve program, custodial 

and commercial services personnel. 

CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM: 

File contains personnel papers and 

forms including but not limited to 

applications, transcripts, 

correspondence, notices of personnel 

action, performance appraisals, internal 

staffing resume, professionalization 

documentation and correspondence, 

training forms, temporary duty, letters 

of reprimand, special assignment 

documentation, letters of 

commendation, promotion 

documentation, field assignment 

preference, requests for transfers, 

permanent change of station, passport, 

transportation, official orders, awards, 

suggestions, pictures, complaints, 

separation, retirement, time utilization, 

scholarship/fellowship or other school 

appointments, military service, reserve 

status, military check in/out sheets, 

military orders, security appraisal, 

career battery and other test results, 

language capability, military personnel 

utilization survey, work experience, 

notes and memoranda on individual 

aspects of performance, productivity 

and suitability, information on 

individual eligibility to serve on various 

boards and committees, emergency loan 

records, other information relevant to 

personnel management, housing 

information where required. 

AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE SYSTEM: 

National Security Agency Act of 1959, 

Public Law 86–36, (codified at 50 U.S.C. 

402); 5 U.S.C. and certain implementing 

Office of Personnel Management 

regulations contained within 5 CFR part 

293, Personnel Records; 10 U.S.C. 1124, 

Cash awards for disclosures, 

suggestions, inventions, and scientific 

achievements; 44 U.S.C. 3101, Records 

management by agency heads; general 

duties and E.O. 9397 (SSN), as 

amended. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES