alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 19, 2011
 
 TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.
  Delaware
    
    1-10545
    
    13-3355897(State or Other 
Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 80 Pine Street, New York, New York
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    10005
(Zip Code)
   
   þ
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 8.01. Other Events.
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Exhibit No
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. dated as of July 19, 2011.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  TRANSATLANTIC HOLDINGS, INC.

(Registrant)By:
    /s/ Gary A. SchwartzGary A. SchwartzDate: July 19, 2011
    
    Senior Vice President and General Counsel




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit No

    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release of Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. dated as of July 19, 2011.
CENTRAL VALLEY OPERATIONS OFFICE

CHINOOK SALMON REPORT

October 2010

Note: Shaded area not verified with DFG data Preliminary Data - Subject to Change

Winter Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) Spring Run Chinook Salmon Estimated Loss (Incidental Take) 

Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Daily SWP Daily CVP Daily Combined Season Combined Da

Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged* No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag Tagged No Tag I

DATE Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated

Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss Loss

1-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,957 2-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,865 3-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,106 4-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,059 5-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 6,068 6-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,844 7-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,991 8-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,540 9-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,985 

10-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,985 11-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,976 12-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,012 13-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,660 

14-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,795 15-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,918 16-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,445 17-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,882 18-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,291 19-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,981 20-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,856 21-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,506 22-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,375 23-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,780 24-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 2,922 25-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 3,927 26-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 44,507 

27-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 4,969 

28-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,957 

29-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,912 

30-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,961 

31-Oct-10 0000 0000 0000 0000 5,962 

Total 0000 0 0 0 0000 00000 197,993 

Winter Run Incidental Take Levels (Oct 1 thru May 31) Spring Run Incidental Take Levels for Season Combined Total (Oct 1 thru Jun 30)

Banks T
#### § 418.2355 What are the rules for reopening a decision by an ALJ of the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA) or by the Medicare Appeals Council (MAC)?

The rules in 42 CFR 423.1980 through 423.1986 govern reopenings of decisions by an administrative law judge of the OMHA and decisions by the MAC. A decision by an administrative law judge of the OMHA may be reopened by the administrative law judge or the MAC. A decision by the MAC may be reopened only by the MAC.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Small Business Investment Act of 1958

              														Small Business Investment Act of 1958, August 21, 1958.						https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1081,			accessed on August 25, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
#### Charles W. Palmer, Respondent, v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc., Respondent, and Frank W. Kingsley, Appellant. Mary J. Palmer, Respondent, v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Company, Inc., Respondent, and Frank W. Kingsley, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Saratoga Special Term, denying defendant Kingsley’s motion for a separate trial of issues raised by a cross complaint contained in the answer of the defendant Socony-Vacuum Oil Company. The order appealed from was discretionary. The issues involved are not complicated and no clear legal right to a separate trial has been shown. Order affirmed, with $10 costs. Brewster, Foster, Russell and Deyo, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J„, dissents and votes to dismiss the appeal, in the following memorandum: Appeal *by*defendant Kingsley from an order denying a motion to try separately the issue of contract liability raised by» the codefendant oil company’s answer. The plaintiffs-respondents bring these actions for damages alleged to have been caused by the, combined negligence of both defendants. General denials have been pleaded. Defendant-respondent oil company sets up cross answers against the codefendant alleging contract liability on his part in the event of a recovery against the oil company by plaintiffs for negligence. A separate trial of the issues would seem required in the interests of clarity but, the determination of this issue is an incident of a trial and not appealable. Appellant, following a trial, may have a review if the discretion of the trial justice was unwisely exercised. For this reason I vote to dismiss the appeal.
EXHIBIT 12.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

I, Takyung (Sam) Tsang, Chief Financial Officer of China Medical Technologies Inc. (the Company), certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 28, 2007



|       |  |                           
|------ |  | --------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    TAKYUNG (SAM)
TSANG
|Name:  |  | Takyung (Sam) Tsang       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
### §4357. Definitions

For purposes of this chapter—

(1) the term "Advisory Committee" means the Advisory Committee on Historical Diplomatic Documentation for the Department of State;

(2) the term "Historian" means the Historian of the Department of State or any successor officer of the Department of State responsible for carrying out the functions of the Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, of the Department of State, as in effect on October 28, 1991;

(3) the term "originating agency" means, with respect to a record, the department, agency, or entity of the United States (or any officer or employee thereof of acting in his official capacity) that originates, develops, publishes, issues, or otherwise prepares that record or receives that record from outside the United States Government; and

(4) the term "record" includes any written material (including any document, memorandum, correspondence, statistical data, book, or other papers), map, photograph, machine readable material, or other documentary material, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by an agency of the United States Government under Federal law or in connection with the transaction of public business and preserved or appropriate for preservation by that agency or its legitimate successor as evidence of the organization, functions, policies, decisions, procedures, operations, or other activities of the Government or because of the informational value in them, and such term does not include library or museum material made or acquired and preserved solely for reference or exhibition purposes, any extra copy of a document preserved only for convenience of reference, or any stocks of publications or of processed documents.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title IV, §407, as added Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §198(a), Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 690.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Authority of Secretary of State

Except as otherwise provided, Secretary of State to have and exercise any authority vested by law in any official or office of Department of State and references to such officials or offices deemed to refer to Secretary of State or Department of State, as appropriate, see section 2651a of this title and section 161(d) of Pub. L. 103–236, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10188]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Federal Register CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 77, No. 77, 
Friday, April 20, 2012, page 23666.

ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF MEETING: Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 10 a.m.- 
11 a.m.

MEETING CANCELED. For a recorded message containing the latest agenda 
information, call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: April 24, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-10188 Filed 4-24-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
(No. 74-CC-374

#### Alfred W. Pflasterer, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 20, 1974.*

Alfred W. Pflasterer, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification**

 

In connection with Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s (the “Company”) Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  April 29,   2014 | /s/   John C. Wobensmith |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                   | Name:                    | John   C. Wobensmith |
|                                   | Title:                   | Chief   Financial Officer & Secretary |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY

 6,767

 8,115

 7,175

 6,492

 5,844

 5,499

 7,288

 7,058

 6,882

 7,695

 7,588

 4,780

 6,286

 6,401

 5,077

 6,228

 4,821

 5,040

 6,550

 5,249

 5,903

 5,990

 5,970

 6,587

 5,101

 6,405

 5,700

 4,965

 138,187

 137,706

 138,530

 138,420

 137,666

 136,335

 134,742

 134,928

 134,887

 134,681

 135,257

 135,703

 133,458

 132,757

 132,200

 130,413

 129,809

 127,899

 126,292

 126,200

 124,876

 124,240

 123,719

 123,204

 123,302

 121,983

 121,968

 121,285

 385,046

 384,179

 384,295

 385,088

 386,490

 388,166

 387,970

 388,014

 388,231

 387,624

 387,155

 389,517

 390,256

 390,842

 392,723

 393,359

 395,370

 397,061

 397,158

 398,551

 399,221

 399,770

 400,311

 400,209

 401,597

 401,612

 402,332

 403,750

 548,306

 560,748

 574,598

 589,493

 605,398

 621,843

 635,340

 649,224

 663,409

 676,172

 689,136

 707,208

 722,441

 737,440

 754,970

 770,196

 788,209

 805,717

 820,052

 837,117

 852,735

 868,140

 883,567

 897,588

 914,999

 929,331

 945,318

 963,025

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2013 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: March 14, 2013

 144,954

 145,821

 145,705

 144,912

 143,510

 141,834

 142,030

 141,986

 141,769

 142,376

 142,845

 140,483

 139,744

 139,158

 137,277

 136,641

 134,630

 132,939

 132,842

 131,449

 130,779

 130,230

 129,689

 129,791

 128,403

 128,388

 127,668

 126,250

 751,694

 739,252

 725,402

 710,507

 694,602

 678,157

 664,660

 650,776

 636,591

 623,828

 610,864

 592,792

 577,559

 562,560

 545,030

 529,804

 511,791

 494,283

 479,948

 462,883

 447,265

 431,860

 416,433

 402,412

 385,001

 370,669

 354,682

 336,975

 3,800,000

 3,813,000

 3,827,000

 3,841,000

 3,857,000

 3,874,000

 3,887,000

 3,901,000

 3,915,000

 3,928,000

 3,941,000

 3,959,000

 3,974,000

 3,989,000

 4,007,000

 4,022,000

 4,040,000

 4,058,000

 4,072,000

 4,089,000

 4,105,000

 4,120,000

 4,136,000

 4,150,000

 4,167,000

 4,181,000

 4,197,000

 4,215,000

 1.4240

 1.4596

 1.4952

 1.5308

 1.5664

 1.6020

 1.6376

 1.6732

 1.7088

 1.7444

 1.7800

 1.8156

 1.8512

 1.8868

 1.9224

 1.9580

 1.9936

 2.0292

 2.0648

 2.1004

 2.1360

 2.1716

 2.2072

 2.2428

 2.2784

 2.3140

 2.3496

 2.3852

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 145,460
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1080 Notice of right to hearing on proposed finding of substantial failure.

If, following the mandatory performance support period and the 3-month adjustment period, a State agency again falls below two of three threshold levels (one being performance accuracy) in two consecutive quarters in the succeeding 12 months, we will notify the State in writing that we will find that the State agency has substantially failed to meet our standards unless the State submits a written request for a hearing with the Department of Health and Human Services' Departmental Appeals Board within 30 days after receiving the notice. The notice will identify the threshold levels that were not met by the State agency, the period during which the thresholds were not met, and the accuracy and processing time levels attained by the State agency during this period. If a hearing is not requested, the State agency will be found to have substantially failed to meet our standards, and we will implement our plans to assume the disability determination function.

[56 FR 11024, Mar. 14, 1991]
(No. 74-CC-529

#### Gulf Oil Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 17, 1974.*

Gulf Oil Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
§ 404.1211 Interstate instrumentalities. For Social Security coverage purposes under section 218 of the Act, interstate instrumentalities are treated, to the extent practicable, as States, that is: ( a ) They must be legally authorized to enter into an agreement with the Commissioner;
( b ) They are subject to the same rules that are applied to the States;
( c ) They may divide retirement systems and cover only the positions of members who want coverage; and
( d ) They may provide coverage for firefighters and police officers in positions under a retirement system.
[53 FR 32976, Aug. 29, 1988, as amended at 61 FR 38368, July 24, 1996; 62 FR 38451, July 18, 1997]
### §2683. Assumption of obligations of operation of broadcasting facilities

The Department of State shall assume all obligations of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation covering operations of said facilities, equipment, and appurtenant property outstanding at the date of transfer.

(July 9, 1949, ch. 301, §3, 63 Stat. 408.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was formerly classified to section 170c of Title 5 prior to the general revision and enactment of Title 5, Government Organization and Employees, by Pub. L. 89–554, §1, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 378.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Abolition of Reconstruction Finance Corporation

Section 6(a) of Reorg. Plan No. 1 of 1957, eff. June 30, 1957, 22 F.R. 4633, 71 Stat. 647, set out as a note under section 601 of Title 15, Commerce and Trade, abolished the Reconstruction Finance Corporation.
§ 498.202 Hearing before an administrative law judge. ( a ) A party sanctioned under any criteria specified in §§ 498.100 through 498.132 may request a hearing before an ALJ.
( b ) In civil monetary penalty cases, the parties to a hearing will consist of the respondent and the Inspector General.
( c ) The request for a hearing must be: ( 1 ) In writing and signed by the respondent or by the respondent's attorney; and
( 2 ) Filed within 60 days after the notice, provided in accordance with § 498.109, is received by the respondent or upon a showing of good cause, the time permitted by an ALJ.
( d ) The request for a hearing shall contain a statement as to the: ( 1 ) Specific issues or findings of fact and conclusions of law in the notice letter with which the respondent disagrees; and
( 2 ) Basis for the respondent's contention that the specific issues or findings and conclusions were incorrect.
( e ) For purposes of this section, the date of receipt of the notice letter will be presumed to be five days after the date of such notice, unless there is a reasonable showing to the contrary.
( f ) The ALJ shall dismiss a hearing request where: ( 1 ) The respondent's hearing request is not filed in a timely manner and the respondent fails to demonstrate good cause for such failure;
( 2 ) The respondent withdraws or abandons respondent's request for a hearing; or
( 3 ) The respondent's hearing request fails to raise any issue which may properly be addressed in a hearing under this part.
[61 FR 65468, Dec. 13, 1996]