alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


PRESS RELEASE                                      OCTOBER 29, 1999


              FOR RELEASE:  Immediately
     FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Kristin Uttech
                            Director of Marketing
                            Penda Corporation
                            (608) 742-5301 Ext. 7827

                                 PENDA ANNOUNCES
                         ACQUISITION OF GLASSTITE, INC.

PORTAGE, WIS. - Penda Corporation announced today that it has acquired the
assets of Glasstite, Inc. Glasstite, located in Dunnell, MN, is a leading
manufacturer of fiberglass camper shells and tonneau covers. Penda currently
owns Tri-Glas, Inc., a fiberglass plant in Dothan, AL.

              Jack Thompson, President and CEO of Penda Corporation, states,
"The planned acquisition of Glasstite allows Penda to further expand our
fiberglass presence. We have identified the fiberglass industry, especially
fiberglass tonneau covers, as an area with exceptional growth opportunities."

              Jeff Rastocan, Vice President of Sales and Marketing for Penda
explains, "Glasstite is the quality leader in fiberglass products, and Penda is
the quality leader in bedliners. Together we will have many market synergies.
Our well-known brand names along with our focus on providing our customers
premium products will allow us to capitalize on our mutual strengths to grow our
current market share."

              Penda, an affiliate of Trivest, Inc., is one of the largest
manufacturers and marketers of pick-up truck bedliners in the United States,
serving both the original equipment and automotive aftermarkets. Penda
manufactures the top brand bedliner, Pendaliner(R) SR(TM) and the officially
licensed products of NASCAR Trucks, the Pendaliner(R) SR PRO(TM) and Pendacover
PRO(TM), as well as the Pendatray SR(TM), Pendacover(TM), Hide-a-Hook(R) tie
downs, Tri-Step(TM) premium step boards and bed mats. Penda's subsidiary,
Tri-Glas Industries, manufacturers premium fiberglass truck accessories
including truck caps, running boards and tonneau.





                                       4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,224,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  315,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      27,864,279
<DEPRECIATION>                             (9,138,940)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,175,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      3,437,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  27,377,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,175,134
<SALES>                                      2,203,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,432,553
<CGS>                                        1,023,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,355,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               355,801
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              96,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                625,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            625,271
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   625,271
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136669 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136669 

 COA: 277020 

Wayne CC: 06-009681-01

GENE RODNEY KELLEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>


         <S>  <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,222,291
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  834,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     82,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,204,284
<PP&E>                                         298,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,563
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,580,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,493,670
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        862
<COMMON>                                    35,978,748
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,018,663
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,580,742
<SALES>                                      2,906,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,184,649
<CGS>                                        2,551,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,551,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,842,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             397,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,209,511)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,209,511)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,209,511)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

August 31, 2006

Mr. Randy Frazier

Metropolitan Transit Authority

P.O. Box 61429

Houston, TX 77208-1429

Mr. David Wayne Hodges

Kennedy Hodges, LLC

3701 Kirby Drive, Suite 400

Houston, TX 77098

RE:Case Number:  04-0757

Court of Appeals Number:  01-04-00022-CV

Trial Court Number:  2003-11948

Style:METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY

v.

M.E.B. ENGINEERING, INC.

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 59.1, after granting the petition for review and without hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals’ judgment and remands the case to the trial court.

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 04-0757Page 1**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DAY ELEV

 1,004.39

 1,005.62

 1,006.74

 1,007.89

 1,009.10

 1,009.95

 1,010.76

 1,011.36

 1,012.03

 1,012.52

 1,013.00

 1,013.64

 1,014.76

 1,016.98

 1,019.03

 1,020.68

 1,022.12

 1,023.35

 1,024.28

 1,025.21

 1,026.50

 1,027.18

 1,027.81

 1,028.53

 1,030.57

 1,036.17

 1,042.78

 1,045.79

 2,925.1

 2,952.5

 2,977.7

 3,003.7

 3,031.2

 3,050.6

 3,069.2

 3,083.0

 3,098.5

 3,109.9

 3,121.0

 3,136.0

 3,162.2

 3,214.6

 3,263.6

 3,303.3

 3,338.2

 3,368.2

 3,390.9

 3,413.8

 3,445.8

 3,462.7

 3,478.4

 3,496.5

 3,547.9

 3,691.9

 3,866.5

 3,947.7

STORAGE

+13.6

+27.5

+25.2

+26.0

+27.5

+19.4

+18.6

+13.8

+15.5

+11.4

+11.1

+14.9

+26.2

+52.4

+49.0

+39.7

+34.9

+30.0

+22.8

+22.9

+31.9

+16.9

+15.7

+18.0

+51.5

+143.9

+174.7

+81.1

CHANGE

 9,149

 15,951

 14,931

 15,175

 14,884

 11,819

 11,258

 9,223

 10,090

 7,756

 8,510

 9,261

 15,367

 27,243

 25,364

 22,060

 19,549

 16,560

 14,041

 13,447

 18,066

 10,822

 10,822

 11,265

 27,434

 72,597

 89,753

 51,034

INFLOW

 2,251

 2,097

 2,223

 2,039

 989

 1,978

 1,833

 2,217

 2,254

 1,987

 2,866

 1,718

 2,130

 802

 673

 2,022

 1,962

 1,428

 2,442

 1,867

 1,938

 2,245

 2,812

 2,125

 1,208

 25

 1,690

 7,726

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 279

 0

 0

 2,383

OUTLET

 65

 13

 27

 40

 27

 47

 47

 34

 34

 34

 27

 14

 14

 7

 7

 7

 14

 14

 109

 36

 22

 51

 81

 44

 7

 8

 8

 16

C.F.S.

 .10

 .02

 .04

 .06

 .04

 .07

 .07

 .05

 .05

 .05

 .04

 .02

 .02

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

 .02

 .15

 .05

 .03

 .07

 .11

 .06

 .01

 .01

 .01

 .02

INCHES

 .00

 2.05

 1.04

 .68

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .41

 .01

 .01

 3.36

 1.09

 .14

 .24

 .01

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .06

 .00

 .00

 .02

 1.46

 5.07

 7.20

 .61

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

FEBRUARY 2019 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 8, 2019

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +1,036.1 583,431 57,547 0 2,662 854 1.22 23.48

ACRE-FEET +1,036,100 1,157,235 114,144 0 5,280 1,694

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 114,144

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 5,280

 119,424

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 23.48

JULY 1, 2018 56.05

 2,911.5

Table 3

OCT 1, 2018 TO DATE = 55.79
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 18,647

 18,673

 19,318

 19,374

 20,256

 20,219

 20,674

 20,467

 20,984

 21,550

 21,322

 21,482

 19,890

 18,538

 16,939

 17,384

 18,820

 18,996

 19,604

 20,465

 21,797

 0

 19,945

 22,264

 20,449

 20,245

 18,559

 17,519

 18,111

 18,234

 18,205

 10,077

 9,777

 10,458

 10,167

 10,712

 10,370

 10,499

 10,094

 9,081

 9,835

 10,213

 10,115

 8,323

 9,039

 9,257

 7,742

 9,355

 9,724

 8,698

 9,003

 8,065

 0

 9,336

 9,449

 9,803

 9,520

 8,111

 8,545

 6,276

 9,265

 10,960

 14,196

 13,795

 14,264

 14,998

 15,194

 14,822

 14,713

 14,809

 14,818

 15,113

 15,723

 15,423

 14,557

 14,030

 13,650

 12,409

 13,134

 13,056

 13,512

 14,161

 14,435

 0

 13,904

 14,963

 14,600

 14,975

 13,680

 12,958

 12,266

 13,290

 13,743

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JULY 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG BOTTOM ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
Exhibit 23.2


CONSENT OF DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We hereby consent to the use of the name DeGolyer and MacNaughton, to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton as independent petroleum engineers, and to the inclusion of information taken from our “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2012 on Certain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC,” “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2011 on Certain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC” and “Appraisal Report as of December 31, 2010 on Certain Properties owned by Linn Energy, LLC” in the sections “Business,” “Risk Factors,” “Selected Financial Data,” “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Supplemental Oil and Gas Data (Unaudited)” in Amendment No. 1 to the Linn Energy, LLC Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2012, (the “10-K/A”) and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-131153 and 333-151610) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-146120, 333-148061, 333-148134, 333-162357, and 333-184647) on Form S-3.  We further consent to the inclusion of our Letter Report dated June 3, 2013 as Exhibit 99.1 in the 10-K/A.








Very truly yours,





/s/  DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON


Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716


Dallas, Texas November 5, 2013
128 STAT. 2114 PUBLIC LAW 113–227—DEC. 16, 2014 

Public Law 113–227 

113th Congress 

An Act 

To establish the Law School Clinic Certification Program of the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. USPTO LAW SCHOOL CLINIC CERTIFICATION PROGRAM. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Law School Clinic Certification Program of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, as implemented by the Office, is established as a program entitled the 

‘‘Law School Clinic Certification Program’’. The Program shall allow 

students enrolled in a participating law school’s clinic to practice 

patent and trademark law before the Office by drafting, filing, 

and prosecuting patent or trademark applications, or both, on a 

pro-bono basis for clients that qualify for assistance from the law 

school’s clinic. The Director shall establish regulations and procedures for application to and participation in the Program. All law 

schools accredited by the American Bar Association are eligible 

for participation in the Program, and shall be examined for acceptance using identical criteria established by the Director. The Program shall be in effect for the 10-year period beginning on the 

date of the enactment of this Act. 

(b) REPORT ON THE PROGRAM.—The Director shall, not later 

than the last day of the 2-year period beginning on the date of 

the enactment of this Act, submit to the Committees on the 

Judiciary of the House of Representatives and the Senate a report 

on the Program, describing the number of law schools and law 

students participating in the Program, the work done through the 

Program, the benefits of the Program, and any recommendations 

of the Director for modifications to the Program. 

(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

(1) OFFICE.—The term ‘‘Office’’ means the United States 

Patent and Trademark Office. 

(2) PROGRAM.—The term ‘‘Program’’ means the Law School 

Clinic Certification Program established in subsection (a). 

Effective date. 

Time period. 

Regulations. 

Procedures. 

35 USC 2 note. 

Dec. 16, 2014 

[H.R. 5108] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 113–227—DEC. 16, 2014 128 STAT. 2115 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5108: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 113–588 (Comm. on the Judiciary). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014): 

Sept. 15, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 4, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(3) DIRECTOR.—The term ‘‘Director’’ means the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 

the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 

Approved December 16, 2014. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130084 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130084 

 COA: 262021 

Wayne CC: 90-009382 

DESMOND ANDERE WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,058.03

 1,057.66

 1,057.21

 1,056.87

 1,056.59

 1,056.29

 1,056.12

 1,055.64

 1,055.20

 1,054.76

 1,054.42

 1,054.06

 1,053.53

 1,053.06

 1,052.54

 1,051.98

 1,051.41

 1,050.89

 1,050.38

 1,049.87

 1,049.30

 1,048.80

 1,048.20

 1,047.48

 1,046.79

 1,046.10

 1,045.44

 1,044.76

 1,044.04

 1,043.31

 4,289.8

 4,279.2

 4,266.3

 4,256.5

 4,248.5

 4,240.0

 4,235.1

 4,221.4

 4,208.9

 4,196.5

 4,186.8

 4,176.7

 4,161.7

 4,148.5

 4,133.9

 4,118.2

 4,102.3

 4,087.8

 4,073.7

 4,059.5

 4,043.8

 4,030.0

 4,013.5

 3,993.7

 3,974.9

 3,956.1

 3,938.2

 3,919.8

 3,900.3

 3,880.7

STORAGE

-9.5

-10.6

-12.9

-9.7

-8.0

-8.6

-4.9

-13.7

-12.5

-12.5

-9.6

-10.2

-14.9

-13.2

-14.6

-15.7

-15.9

-14.5

-14.2

-14.1

-15.8

-13.8

-16.5

-19.7

-18.9

-18.8

-17.9

-18.4

-19.4

-19.6

CHANGE

 4,647

 4,158

 3,519

 5,215

 5,856

 5,618

 7,691

 2,567

 3,045

 3,028

 4,599

 4,698

 2,285

 3,503

 3,019

 3,465

 3,028

 3,612

 3,773

 3,772

 3,306

 3,697

 2,794

 2,735

 3,514

 3,810

 4,095

 4,046

 3,151

 3,247

INFLOW

 9,181

 9,092

 9,676

 9,999

 9,828

 9,853

 9,945

 9,329

 9,077

 9,027

 9,133

 9,501

 9,450

 9,845

 9,959

 11,007

 10,586

 10,543

 10,545

 10,659

 10,938

 10,285

 10,993

 12,588

 12,814

 13,160

 12,932

 12,619

 12,748

 12,841

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 397

 0

 0

OUTLET

 262

 421

 353

 126

 59

 84

 193

 125

 275

 291

 316

 332

 364

 330

 412

 370

 459

 376

 367

 244

 309

 365

 121

 97

 209

 128

 192

 310

 198

 293

C.F.S.

 .31

 .50

 .42

 .15

 .07

 .10

 .23

 .15

 .33

 .35

 .38

 .40

 .44

 .40

 .50

 .45

 .56

 .46

 .45

 .30

 .38

 .45

 .15

 .12

 .26

 .16

 .24

 .39

 .25

 .37

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .02

 .40

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2012 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: July 20, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -418.6 115,493 318,153 0 397 7,981 9.72 .49

ACRE-FEET -418,600 229,080 631,056 0 787 15,830

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 631,056

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 787

 631,843

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .49

JULY 1, 2011 43.92

 4,299.3

Table 3
# C_2016075EN.01030001.xml

| 26.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/300 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/300

---

P7_TA(2013)0310

Timing of auctions of greenhouse gas allowances ***I

Amendment adopted by the European Parliament on 3 July 2013 on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/87/EC clarifying provisions on the timing of auctions of greenhouse gas allowances (COM(2012)0416 — C7-0203/2012 — 2012/0202(COD)) (1)

1

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

(2016/C 075/43)

Amendment 21

Amendment 21

Proposal for a decision

Proposal for a decision

Article 1

Article 1

Directive 2003/87/EC

Article 10 — paragraph 4 — subparagraph 1 — last sentence

| Text proposed by the Commission | Amendment |
| --- | --- |
| The Commission
  shall
  ,
  where appropriate,
  adapt the timetable for
  each period
  so as to ensure an orderly functioning of the market. | Where an assessment shows for the individual industrial sectors that no significant impact on sectors or subsectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage is to be expected,
  the Commission
  may, in exceptional circumstances
  , adapt the timetable for
  the period referred to in Article 13(1) beginning on 1 January 2013
  so as to ensure an orderly functioning of the market.
  The Commission shall make no more than one such adaptation for a maximum number of 900 million allowances. |

Text proposed by the Commission

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Amendment

The Commission
  shall
  ,
  where appropriate,
  adapt the timetable for
  each period
  so as to ensure an orderly functioning of the market.

shall

where appropriate,

each period

Where an assessment shows for the individual industrial sectors that no significant impact on sectors or subsectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage is to be expected,
  the Commission
  may, in exceptional circumstances
  , adapt the timetable for
  the period referred to in Article 13(1) beginning on 1 January 2013
  so as to ensure an orderly functioning of the market.
  The Commission shall make no more than one such adaptation for a maximum number of 900 million allowances.

Where an assessment shows for the individual industrial sectors that no significant impact on sectors or subsectors exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage is to be expected,

may, in exceptional circumstances

the period referred to in Article 13(1) beginning on 1 January 2013

The Commission shall make no more than one such adaptation for a maximum number of 900 million allowances.

---

(1)  The matter was referred back to the committee responsible for reconsideration pursuant to Rule 57(2), second subparagraph (A7-0046/2013).

1

---
### §10261. Sanctions exception relating to importation of goods

#### (a) In general

The authorities and requirements to impose sanctions under this chapter shall not include the authority or requirement to impose sanctions on the importation of goods.

#### (b) Good defined

In this section, the term "good" means any article, natural or man-made substance, material, supply, or manufactured product, including inspection and test equipment, and excluding technical data.

(Pub. L. 117–263, div. E, title LV, §5579, Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3370.)