alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 98

 96

 98

 98

 100

 108

 111

 104

 101

 96

 97

 93

 99

 89

 91

 93

 90

 90

 88

 98

 108

 117

 111

 140

 129

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 92

 92

 92

 92

 92

 93

 90

 93

 92

 92

 88

 81

 83

 81

 81

 81

 77

 81

 81

 80

 80

 81

 84

 82

 80

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 93

 93

 94

 94

 95

 97

 97

 96

 95

 93

 92

 88

 86

 84

 83

 84

 83

 83

 83

 85

 87

 89

 91

 94

 90

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: July 9, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
#### Morton Brown, Appellant, v. Victor Brown et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present— Peck, P. J., Glennon, Cohn, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1014 Responsibilities for obtaining evidence to make disability determinations. ( a ) We or the State agency will secure from the claimant or other sources any evidence the State agency needs to make a disability determination. When we secure the evidence, we will furnish it to the State agency for use in making the disability determination.
( b ) At our request, the State agency will obtain and furnish medical or other evidence and provide assistance as may be necessary for us to carry out our responsibility for making disability determinations in those classes of cases described in the written guidelines for which the State agency does not make the determination.
[46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981, as amended at 79 FR 33683, June 12, 2014]
Order entered May 18, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01476-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF H.D.V.,JR. AND B.V., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 302nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-04711

ORDER

We GRANT the May 13, 2015 motion of Elizabeth Neve Griffin, Official Court 

Reporter for the 302nd Judicial District Court, for an extension of time to file the reporter’s 

record. The reporter’s record shall be filed by JUNE 15, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2477
TRUITT A. SEGERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-657-6) Submitted: October 3, 1995 Decided: March 21, 1996 Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Truitt A. Segers, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Segers v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affairs , No. CA-94-657-6 (M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
### §287h. Limitation on loan

The total amount of money that may be loaned to the United Nations pursuant to the authorization contained in section 287g of this title shall not exceed the aggregate amount of loans made by other nations.

(Pub. L. 87–731, §2, Oct. 2, 1962, 76 Stat. 695.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was not enacted as part of act Dec. 20, 1945, ch. 583, 59 Stat. 619, known as the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, which comprises this subchapter.
Exhibit 99.4 - Administrative Report of the Trust

                              Administrative Report
                                       for
            Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-059 (the "Trust")


                           Payment Date June 15, 2005
                             CUSIP Number 41659FDB7


(i)    the amount received by the Indenture Trustee from Hartford Life Insurance
       Company ("Hartford Life") as of the payment date in respect of the
       principal, interest and premium, if any, on Funding Agreement No. 405059
       (the "Funding Agreement") issued by Hartford Life Insurance Company
       ("Hartford Life").

                         Interest:         $3,724.33

                         Principal:        $0.00

(ii)   the amount of payment on such Payment Date to holders allocable to
       principal and interest on the notes of the Trust.

                         Interest:         $3,724.33

                         Principal:        $0.00

(iii)  the aggregate stated principal amount of the Funding Agreement, the
       current interest rate or rates thereon at the close of business on such
       Payment Date, and the current rating assigned to the Funding Agreement.

               Aggregate Principal Amount:         $934,015.00

               Interest Rate:                      4.71%

                               Ratings:

                                       Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                       Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

(iv)   the aggregate principal balance of the notes of the Trust at the close of
       business on such Payment Date and the current rating assigned to such
       notes.

                               Aggregate Principal Amount: $934,000.00

                               Ratings:

                                       Moody's Investor Services: Aa3
                                       Standard & Poors' Rating Service: AA-

AMACAR Pacific Corp., as administrator of Hartford Life Global Funding
Trust 2005-059

By:    /s/  Evelyn Echevarria
       --------------------------
       Name:    Evelyn Echevarria
       Title:   Vice President


                                       1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this is notice that on February 24, 2012, Rhodes Technologies, 498 Washington Street, Coventry, Rhode Island 02816, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IMethylphenidate (1724)
IICodeine (9050)
IIDihydrocodeine (9120)
IIOxycodone (9143)
IIHydromorphone (9150)
IIHydrocodone (9193)
IIOripavine (9330)
IIThebaine (9333)
IIOxymorphone (9652)
IINoroxymorphone (9668)
IIFentanyl (9801)
II
 The company plans to manufacture the listed controlled substances in bulk for conversion and sale to dosage form manufacturers. Any other such applicant, and any person who is presently registered with 
                    ( print page 24987)
                    DEA to manufacture such substances, may file comments or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). Any such written comments or objections should be addressed, in quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no later than June 25, 2012. Dated: April 17, 2012. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2012-10054 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
(No. 6991

#### Edward L. Jones, Robert Newell, John N. Jurgens, and Charles K. Dutch, Claimants, *vs.*State of Illinois, Cass County Educational Service Region, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December 26, 1972.*

Leland Schnake, Attorney for Claimants.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
94°32' 94°31' 94°30' 94°29' 94°28' 

39°00' 

39°01' 

39°02' 

39°03' 

39°04' 

39°05' 

39°06' 

39°07' 

39°08' 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Prepared in cooperation with the 

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2006–5089

Blue Parkway gage, stage elevation of 772 feet—PLATE 4.12

Kelly, B.P., Rydlund, P.H., Jr., 2006

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

By

Brian P. Kelly and Paul H. Rydlund, Jr.

2006

* #

* #

* #

* #

* #

A B C D E F 

13 

12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003 

 and City of Kansas City, Missouri, digital data, 1:833, 2004

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

U.S. Geological Survey 

stage gage at 12th Street 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at Blue Parkway 

National Weather Service

flood-forecast location 

at Highway 40

U.S. Geological Survey streamflow 

gage at Stadium Drive 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at 63rd Street 

I - 435 

I-435 

Hawthorne Road 

 Trafficway 

Clary Boulevard 

I-70 

23rd Street 

U S Highway 40 

17th Street 

Road I - 435 

R

a

yto

wn

Coal Mine Road

Van Brunt 

Boulevard

Avenue 

Hard

esty

63rd Steet Brighton

L

e

wis

R

oad

67th

Street

Manchester

Gregory Boulevard

Drive Crest

A

venue

EXPLANATION

WATER DEPTH, IN FEET, AT STAGE ELEVATION 

 OF 772 FEET AT BLUE PARKWAY GAGE 

 >, greater than

 0 to 1

 >1 to 2

 >2 to 5

 >5 to 10

 >10

LAND SURFACE BELOW RIVER STAGE

 (levee protected or unconnected to river)

STUDY AREA

GAGE OR FLOOD-FORECAST LOCATION

 (ALERT, Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time)

# *

BLUE RIVER FLOOD INUNDATION

0 0.5 1 KILOMETER 

0 0.5 1 MILE 

FORECAST LOCATION STAGE STAGE ELEVATION 

12TH STREET 43.9 758.3

HIGHWAY 40 39.9 761.6

STADIUM DRIVE 44.6 762.9

BLUE PARKWAY 49.5 772.0 

63RD STREET 64.0 785.8
#### § 404.425 Total amount of deductions where deduction events occur in more than 1 month.

If a deduction event described in §§ 404.415, 404.417, and 404.421 occurs in more than 1 month, the total amount deducted from an individual's benefits is equal to the sum of the deductions for all months in which any such event occurred.

[68 FR 40122, July 7, 2003]
#### Robert PUSTKA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PRINTPACK INC., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-40043.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 22, 2006.

*584Thomas N. Thurlow, Houston, TX, John Gerard Werner, Reaud, Morgan *&*Quinn, Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Patricia D. Chamblin, Michele Smith, Sean Stotsky, Mehaffy *&*Weber, Beaumont, TX, Darryl Jan Silvera, The Silvera Firm, Dallas, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before JOLLY, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Printpack asserts that Pustka admits the pallet in question arrived at his line with no instability; thus, Printpack concludes that any injury-causing instability was caused solely by Pustka’s actions. We have examined the transcript, and we are satisfied that there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict against Print-pack.

1) Although Pustka perceived no instability when the pallet was first delivered, there is testimony that the pallet held three rolls with a total weight of more than twice the average and with one of the rolls overhanging the edge of the pallet; that, after cutting the band that stabilized the rolls on the pallet and removing the largest of the three rolls, Pustka observed the remaining rolls leaning and attempted to correct the instability; and that the leaning was indicative of negligent loading of the pallet.

2) Pustka and his co-workers testified that rules prohibiting a worker from moving heavy loads without assistance from another worker or a mechanical device were frequently ignored, even in the presence of supervisors, and that no disciplinary action was ever taken. As the District Court noted, Printpack’s “only attempt to rebut this devastating testimony was to call a very low level supervisor,” whose testimony the jury could reasonably have discredited.

This case was fully tried to a jury and substantively reviewed by the District Court on a motion for directed verdict. Making all reasonable inferences in favor of Pustka, and refraining from re-weighing evidence and witness credibility, we find sufficient evidence in the record to allow a rational jury to conclude that Pustka’s injury was proximately caused either by negligence in loading the pallet or by negligent enforcement of the safety rule prohibiting solo manhandling of rolls. Under Texas law, this is sufficient to render judgment against Printpack, a non-subscriber *585to Texas’s worker’s compensation program. The judgment of the District Court is

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**** 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Annual Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: April 15, 2009

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| Avery Pack, President and           Chief Executive Officer           (Principal Executive Officer) and           Acting Chief Financial Officer           (Principal Financial Officer and           Principal Accounting Officer) |
#### § 404.1914 Certificate of coverage.

Under some agreements, proof of coverage under one social security system may be required before the individual may be exempt from coverage under the other system. Requests for certificates of coverage under the U.S. system may be submitted by the employer, employee, or self-employed individual to SSA.
(No. 7012

#### V. Kachgal, M.D., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed September 20, 1973.*

Dr. V. Kachgal, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; William E. Webber, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Final environmental impactstatement for the four-forest restoration initiative: Coconino and KaibabNational Forests, Coconino County, Arizona.**
 
Volumes: One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.105/2: MB-R 3-04-24
Item Number:0082-A-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000941618
 
April 23, 2018
#### In the Matter of Thomas MacCarrol, Appellant, against City of New York, Respondent.

On the facts of this case, we think that leave to serve a notice of claim should have been granted. Order denying petitioner’s [appellant’s] motion for leave unanimously reversed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant and the motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |   |                                                                                                                        |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  March      1, 2010 |   | /s/      John C. Wobensmith                      |   |
|                                |   | Name:      John C. Wobensmith                                                                                               |   |
|                                |   | Title:        Chief Financial Officer, Secretary & Treasurer                                                  |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REESTABLISHMENT OF THE

M AGISTERIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE

20 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :

:

:

: NO. 473

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

ORDER

P ER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11 th day of May 20 22 , upon consideration of the Petition to

Reestablish the Magisterial District s of the 20 th Judicial District ( Huntingdon County) of

the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the

Petition, which provides for the reestablishment of Magisterial District 20

- 3

- 04 within

Huntingdon County as it currently exist s , to be effective immediately, is grante d; and that

the Petition, which provides for the realignment of Magisterial Districts 20

- 3

- 01 and 20

- 3

-

02, within Hunting don County, to be effective October 4, 2022, is granted.

Said Magisterial Districts will be reestablished as follows :

Magisterial District 20

- 3

- 01

Magisterial District Judge Douglas L. Gummo Alexandria Borough

Birmingham Borough

Marklesburg Borough

Petersburg Borough

Barree Township

Franklin Township

Hopewell Township

Jackson Township

Lincoln Township

Logan Township

Miller Township

Morris Township

Oneida Township

Penn TownshipPorter Township

Spruce Creek Township

Walker Township

Warriors Mark Township

West Township

Magisterial District 20

- 3

- 02

Magisterial District Judge Rufus S. Brenneman Huntingdon Borough

Mapleton Borough

Mill Creek Borough

Brady Township

Henderson Township

Juniata Township

Smithfield Township

Union Township

Magisterial District 20

- 3

- 04

Magisterial District Judge Lisa M. Covert Broad Top City Borough

Cassville Borough

Coalmont Borough

Dudley Borough

Mount Union Borough

Orbisonia Borough

Rockhill Furnace Borough

Saltillo Borough

Shade Gap Borough

Shirleysburg Borough

Three Springs Borough

Carbon Township

Cass Township

Clay Township

Cromwell Township

Dublin Township

Shirley T ownship

Springfield Township

Tell Township

Todd Township

Wood Township
# C_2012304EN.01001201.xml

| 9.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/12

---

Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

Extension of the period

2012/C 304/10

On 17 August 2012, the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1). The first working day following receipt of the request is 20 August 2012.

1

The request, from Noble Energy International Ltd, concerns exploration for oil and gas in Cyprus. The request was the subject of a notice in OJ C 270, 7.9.2012, p. 4.

The initial period expires on 20 November 2012.

Given that the Commission needs to obtain and analyse additional information, and in compliance with the provisions laid down in the second sentence of Article 30(6), the period allowed to the Commission to take a decision on this request is extended by three months.

The final period therefore expires on 20 February 2013.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 620.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part implement 42 U.S.C. 503(l). 42 U.S.C. 503(l) permits States to enact legislation to provide for State-conducted testing of an unemployment compensation applicant for the unlawful use of controlled substances, as a condition of unemployment compensation eligibility, if the applicant was discharged for unlawful use of controlled substances by his or her most recent employer, or if suitable work (as defined under the State unemployment compensation law) is only available in an occupation for which drug testing is regularly conducted (as determined under this part). 42 U.S.C. 503(l)(1)(A)(ii) provides that the occupations that regularly conduct drug testing will be determined under regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor.