Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 28503 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by July 15, 2013. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Sulfur oxides. 

Dated: April 29, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. In § 52.1220, the table in paragraph 

(d) is amended by revising the entry for 

‘‘Flint Hills Resources, L.P. (formerly 

Koch Petroleum)’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.1220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(d) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MINNESOTA SOURCE-SPECIFIC PERMITS

Name of source Permit No. 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Comments 

*******

Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, 

LLC.

08/29/11 05/15/13, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT BEGINS].Amendment Nine to Findings and 

Order. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–11477 Filed 5–14–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2013–0021 and EPA–R05– 

OAR–2013–0022: FRL–9812–4] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; 

Lake and Porter Counties, Indiana, 

1997 8-Hour Ozone Maintenance Plan 

and 1997 Annual Fine Particulate 

Matter Maintenance Plan Revision to 

Approved Motor Vehicle Emissions 

Budgets 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving Indiana’s 

request to revise the Lake and Porter 

Counties State Implementation Plans 

(SIPs) for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

standard, and the 1997 annual fine 

particulate matter (PM2.5) standard to 

replace the previously approved motor 

vehicle emissions budgets (budgets) 

with budgets developed using EPA’s 

Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator 

(MOVES) 2010a emissions model. The 

Indiana Department of Environmental 

Management (IDEM) submitted these 

requests to EPA with submittal letters 

dated February 1, 2013. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective July 15, 2013, unless EPA 

receives adverse comments by June 14, 

2013. If adverse comments are received, 

EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 

the direct final rule in the Federal 

Register informing the public that the 

rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2013–0021 and EPA–R05–OAR– 

0022, by one of the following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2450. 

4. Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, 

Control Strategies Section, Air Programs 

Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson 

Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, 

Chief, Control Strategies Section, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2013– 

0021 for ozone or EPA–R05–OAR–0022 

for PM2.5. EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
28504 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We 

recommend that you telephone Anthony 

Maietta, Environmental Protection 

Specialist, at (312) 353–8777 before 

visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anthony Maietta, Environmental 

Protection Specialist, Control Strategies 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353–8777, 

maietta.anthony@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This supplementary information 

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What is EPA approving? 

II. What is the background for this action? 

a. SIP Budgets and Transportation 

Conformity 

b. Prior Approval of Budgets 

c. The MOVES Emissions Model 

d. Submission of New Budgets Based on 

MOVES2010a 

III. What are the criteria for approval? 

IV. What is EPA’s analysis of the State’s 

submittal? 

a. The Revised Inventories 

b. Approvability of the MOVES2010aBased Budgets 

c. Applicability of MOBILE6.2-Based 

Budgets 

V. What action is EPA taking? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What is EPA approving? 

EPA is approving new MOVES2010abased budgets for the Lake and Porter 

County, Indiana 1997 8-hour ozone 

maintenance area and the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 maintenance area that will replace 

MOBILE-based budgets in the SIP. The 

Lake and Porter County, Indiana area 

was redesignated to attainment of the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard effective 

May 11, 2010 (75 FR 26113). The Lake 

and Porter County, Indiana area was 

redesignated to attainment of the 1997 

annual PM2.5 standard effective 

February 6, 2012 (76 FR 76302). 

MOBILE6.2-based budgets were 

approved in those actions. Upon the 

effective date of approval of the 

MOVES-based budgets, they must then 

be used in future transportation 

conformity analyses for the area as 

required by section 176(c) of the CAA. 

See the official release of the 

MOVES2010 emissions model (75 FR 

9411–9414) for background and section 

II.(c) below for details. 

II. What is the Background for this 

action? 

a. SIP Budgets and Transportation 

Conformity 

Under the CAA, states are required to 

submit, at various times, control strategy 

SIP revisions and maintenance plans for 

nonattainment and maintenance areas 

for a given National Ambient Air 

Quality Standard (NAAQS). These SIP 

revisions and maintenance plans 

include budgets of on-road mobile 

source emissions for criteria pollutants 

and/or their precursors. Transportation 

plans and projects ‘‘conform’’ to (i.e., 

are consistent with) the SIP when they 

will not cause or contribute to air 

quality violations, delay timely 

attainment of the NAAQS, or delay an 

interim milestone. 

b. Prior Approval of Budgets 

EPA previously approved 

MOBILE6.2-based volatile organic 

compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides 

(NOX) budgets for the Lake and Porter 

County 8-hour ozone maintenance area, 

as well as NOX and direct PM budgets 

for the Lake and Porter County 1997 

annual PM2.5 nonattainment area. The 

ozone maintenance plan established 

2010 and 2020 budgets for the area that 

demonstrated a reduction in emissions 

from the monitored attainment year and 

included a margin of safety. The PM2.5

maintenance plan established budgets 

for 2025 for the area. 

c. The MOVES Emissions Model 

The MOVES model is EPA’s state-ofthe-art tool for estimating highway 

emissions. EPA announced the release 

of MOVES2010 in March 2010 (75 FR 

9411). Use of the MOVES model is 

required for regional emissions analyses 

for transportation conformity 

determinations outside of California that 

begin after March 2, 2013. 

MOVES2010a was used to estimate 

emissions in the same milestone years 

as the original budgets in the SIP. IDEM 

is revising the budgets using the latest 

planning assumptions including 

population and employment updates. In 

addition, newer vehicle registration data 

has been used to update the age 

distribution of the vehicle fleet. 

Updating the budgets with 

MOVES2010a allows the area to 

continue to show conformity to the SIP 

in plans, transportation improvement 

programs, and projects. The interagency 

consultation group has had extensive 

consultation on the requirements and 

need for new budgets. 

d. Submission of New Budgets Based on 

MOVES2010a 

On February 1, 2013, IDEM submitted 

replacement budgets based on 

MOVES2010a for the Lake and Porter 

County area. IDEM provided public 

review and comment for these budgets, 

which ended on January 25, 2013. There 

were no comments. 

IDEM has also provided total 

emissions, including mobile emissions 

based on MOVES2010a, for the 

attainment year of 2006, the interim 

year 2010 and the 2020 maintenance 

year (as shown in table 1). The 

combined emissions reduction for each 

pollutant is the reduction in emissions 

from the base year (in this case the 2006 

attainment year) to the final year of the 

maintenance plan (in this case the 2020 

year). The total emissions include point, 

area, non-road and on-road mobile 

sources. 

TABLE 1—OZONE—TOTAL EMISSIONS WITH MOVES2010A MOBILE EMISSIONS

[Tons per day] 

Year 2006 2010 2020 

Combined 

emissions 

reduction 

(2006–2020) 

VOC ................................................................................................................. 85.90 75.08 69.70 16.20 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 28505 

TABLE 1—OZONE—TOTAL EMISSIONS WITH MOVES2010A MOBILE EMISSIONS—Continued 

[Tons per day] 

Year 2006 2010 2020 

Combined 

emissions 

reduction 

(2006–2020) 

NOX .................................................................................................................. 213.41 192.84 159.58 53.83 

IDEM has added only a small portion 

of the combined emissions reduction 

available for use in NOX and VOC 

budgets for 2010 and 2020. As shown in 

table 1, the submittal demonstrates that 

the area’s emissions decline from the 

attainment year of 2006 to maintain the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard. 

No additional control measures were 

needed to maintain the 1997 ozone 

standard in the Lake and Porter County 

area. An appropriate safety margin for 

NOX and VOCs was selected by the 

interagency consultation group, which 

consists of representatives from the 

Federal Highway Administration, the 

Indiana Department of Transportation, 

IDEM, and EPA. The on-road 

MOVES2010a based budgets for ozone 

are listed in table 2. 

TABLE 2—OZONE—MOTOR VEHICLE

EMISSION BUDGETS (MOVES) FOR

THE LAKE AND PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA, AREA IN TONS PER DAY

Year 2010 2020 

VOC .......... 13.99 5.99 

NOX .......... 47.26 16.69 

IDEM has also provided total 

emissions, including mobile emissions 

based on MOVES2010a, for the 

attainment year of 2008, the interim 

year 2015 and the 2025 maintenance 

year, as shown in table 3. 

TABLE 3—FINE PARTICULATE MATTER—TOTAL EMISSIONS WITH MOVES2010A MOBILE EMISSIONS

[Tons per year] 

Year 2008 2015 2020 2025 

Combined 

emissions reduction (2008– 

2025) 

PM2.5 .................................................................................... 9,052.67 7,246.52 7,074.03 6,810.83 2241.84

NOX ...................................................................................... 64,053.36 45,189.97 42,528.83 37,237.39 26,815.97 

Indiana has added only a small 

portion of the combined emissions 

reduction available for use in NOX and 

PM2.5 budgets for 2015 and 2025. As 

shown in table 3, the reduction in 

emissions between 2008 and 2025 

demonstrates that the area will continue 

to maintain the 1997 annual PM2.5

standard. 

No additional control measures were 

needed to maintain the 1997 annual 

PM2.5 standard in the Lake and Porter 

County area. An appropriate safety 

margin for NOX and PM2.5 was decided 

by the interagency consultation group. 

The on-road MOVES2010a based 

budgets are shown in table 4. 

TABLE 4—PM2.5—MOTOR VEHICLE

EMISSION BUDGETS (MOVES) FOR

LAKE AND PORTER COUNTY, INDIANA

IN TONS PER YEAR

Year 2015 2025 

PM2.5 ......... 374.30 188.73 

NOX .......... 10,486.08 5,472.34 

III. What are the Criteria for approval? 

EPA requires that revisions to existing 

SIPs and budgets continue to meet 

applicable requirements (e.g., RFP, 

attainment, or maintenance). The SIP 

must also meet any applicable SIP 

requirements under CAA section 110. In 

addition, adequacy criteria found at 40 

CFR 93.118(e)(4) must be satisfied 

before EPA can find submitted budgets 

adequate and approve them for 

conformity purposes. 

Areas can revise their budgets and 

inventories using MOVES without 

revising their entire SIP if: (1) The SIP 

continues to meet applicable 

requirements when the previous motor 

vehicle emissions inventories are 

replaced with MOVES base year and 

milestone, attainment, or maintenance 

year inventories; and (2) the state can 

document that growth and control 

strategy assumptions for non-motor 

vehicle sources continue to be valid and 

any minor updates do not change the 

overall conclusions underlying the SIP. 

The Indiana submittals meet this 

requirement as described below in the 

next section. 

For more information, see EPA’s latest 

‘‘Policy Guidance on the Use of 

MOVES2010 for SIP Development, 

Transportation Conformity, and Other 

Purposes’’ (April 2012), available online 

at: www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/ 

transconf/policy.htm#models. 

IV. What Is EPA’s analysis of the State’s 

submittal? 

a. The Revised Inventories 

The February 1, 2013, SIP revision 

requests for the Lake and Porter County 

1997 ozone maintenance area and the 

1997 annual PM2.5 area seek to revise 

only the on-road mobile source 

inventories. IDEM has certified that the 

control strategies remain the same as in 

the original SIP, and that no other 

control strategies are necessary. IDEM 

also finds that growth and control 

strategy assumptions for sources other 

than on-road have not changed 

significantly from the original submittal. 

This is confirmed by the monitoring 

data for the Lake and Porter County 

area, which continues to monitor 

attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
28506 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

standard and the 1997 annual PM2.5

standard. 

b. Approvability of the MOVES2010aBased Budgets 

EPA evaluated the MOVES-based 

budgets submitted on February 1, 2013, 

using the adequacy criteria found in 40 

CFR 93.118(e)(4) and our in-depth 

evaluation of the state’s submittal and 

SIP requirements. Before submitting the 

revised budgets, Indiana followed all 

necessary conformity procedures. The 

budgets are clearly identified and 

precisely quantified in the submittal. 

The budgets, when considered with 

other emissions sources, are consistent 

with continued maintenance of the 1997 

ozone standard. The budgets are clearly 

related to the emissions inventory and 

control measures in the SIP. The 

changes from the previous budgets are 

clearly explained with the change in the 

model from MOBILE6.2 to 

MOVES2010a and the revised and 

updated planning assumptions. The 

inputs to the model are detailed in the 

Appendix to the submittal. EPA has 

reviewed the inputs to the 

MOVES2010a modeling and 

participated in the consultation process. 

The Federal Highway Administration— 

Indiana Division and the Indiana 

Department of Transportation have 

taken a lead role in working with the 

Northwestern Indiana Regional 

Planning Commission to provide 

accurate, timely information and inputs 

to the MOVES2010a model runs. The 

state has documented that growth and 

control strategy assumptions for nonmotor vehicle sources (i.e. area, nonroad, and point) continue to be valid 

and any minor updates do not change 

the overall conclusions of the SIP. 

IDEM’s submission confirms that the 

SIP continues to demonstrate 

maintenance of the 1997 ozone standard 

and annual PM2.5 standard because the 

total emissions in the revised SIP 

(including MOVES2010a emissions for 

mobile sources) decrease from the 

attainment year to the last year of the 

maintenance plan, as shown in tables 1 

and 3. The budgets include an 

appropriate margin of safety while still 

maintaining total emissions below the 

attainment level. 

Based on our review of the February 

1, 2013, submittal, EPA has determined 

that the SIP will continue to meet its 

requirements if the revised motor 

vehicle emissions inventories are 

replaced with MOVES2010a 

inventories. 

c. Applicability of MOBILE6.2-Based 

Budgets 

When we finalize the approval of the 

revised budgets, the state’s existing 

MOBILE6.2-based budgets will no 

longer be applicable for transportation 

conformity purposes. 

V. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving MOVES2010a-based 

budgets for the Lake and Porter County, 

Indiana 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance 

area and 1997 annual PM2.5

maintenance area as submitted on 

February 1, 2013. We are publishing this 

action without prior proposal because 

we view this as a noncontroversial 

amendment and anticipate no adverse 

comments. However, in the proposed 

rules section of this Federal Register 

publication, we are publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve the state plan if 

relevant adverse written comments are 

filed. This rule will be effective July 15, 

2013 without further notice unless we 

receive relevant adverse written 

comments by June 14, 2013. If we 

receive such comments, we will 

withdraw this action before the effective 

date by publishing a subsequent 

document that will withdraw the final 

action. All public comments received 

will then be addressed in a subsequent 

final rule based on the proposed action. 

EPA will not institute a second 

comment period. Any parties interested 

in commenting on this action should do 

so at this time. Please note that if EPA 

receives adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. If we do not receive 

any comments, this action will be 

effective July 15, 2013. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 15, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 28507 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by July 15, 2013. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: April 30, 2013. 

Susan Hedman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 5. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

■ 2. The table in § 52.770 paragraph (e) 

is amended by adding entries in 

alphabetical order for ‘‘Lake and Porter 

Counties 1997 8-hour ozone 

maintenance plan’’ and ‘‘Lake and 

Porter Counties 1997 annual PM2.5

maintenance plan’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.770 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED INDIANA NONREGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Title Indiana date EPA approval Explanation 

*******

Lake and Porter Counties 1997 8-hour 

ozone maintenance plan.

February 1, 2013 ....... May 15, 2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT 

BEGINS].

Revision to motor vehicle emission 

budgets. 

Lake and Porter Counties 1997 annual 

PM2.5 maintenance plan.

February 1, 2013 ....... May 15, 2013, [INSERT PAGE NUMBER WHERE THE DOCUMENT 

BEGINS].

Revision to motor vehicle emission 

budgets. 

* * * * * * * 

■ 3. In § 52.776, revise paragraph (v)(4) 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.776 Control strategy: Particulate atter. 

* * * * * 

(v) * * * 

(4) Approval—On February 1, 2013, 

Indiana submitted a request to revise the 

motor vehicle emission budgets 

(budgets) in the 1997 annual PM2.5

maintenance plan for the Lake and 

Porter County, Indiana maintenance 

area. The budgets are being revised with 

budgets developed with the 

MOVES2010a model. The 2015 motor 

vehicle emissions budgets for Lake and 

Porter County, Indiana are 347.30 tpy 

PM2.5 and 10,486.08 tpy NOX. The 2025 

motor vehicle emissions budgets for the 

Lake and Porter County area are 188.73 

tpy PM2.5 and 5,472.34 tpy for NOX. 

* * * * * 

■ 4. In § 52.777, paragraph (pp) is 

amended by redesignating the existing 

text as paragraph (pp)(1) and by adding 

paragraph (pp)(2) to read as follows: 

§ 52.777 Control Strategy: photochemical 

oxidants. (hydrocarbons). 

* * * * * 

(pp)(1) * * * 

(2) Approval—On February 1, 2013, 

Indiana submitted a request to revise the 

motor vehicle emission budgets 

(budgets) in the 1997 8-hour ozone 

maintenance plan for the Lake and 

Porter County, Indiana maintenance 

area. The budgets are being revised with 

budgets developed with the 

MOVES2010a model. The 2010 motor 

vehicle emissions budgets for Lake and 

Porter County, Indiana are 13.99 tpd 

VOC and 47.26 tpd NOX. The 2020 

motor vehicle emissions budgets for the 

Lake and Porter County area are 5.99 

tpd VOC and 16.69 tpd for NOX. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–11456 Filed 5–14–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0107; FRL–9382–8] 

Spirotetramat; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of spirotetramat 

in or on multiple commodities which 

are identified and discussed later in this 

document. This regulation additionally 

removes several permanent and timelimited tolerances, because they are 

superseded by new tolerances 

established by this document. 

Interregional Research Project Number 4 

(IR–4) requested these tolerances under 

the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act (FFDCA). 

DATES: This regulation is effective May 

15, 2013. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

July 15, 2013, and must be filed in 

accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0107, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West 

Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. The 

Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES