alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 430.101 Policy. ( a ) The Social Security Administration (SSA) may indemnify, in whole or in part, its employees (which for the purpose of this regulation includes former employees) for any verdict, judgment or other monetary award which is rendered against any such employee, provided that the conduct giving rise to the verdict, judgment or award was taken within the scope of his or her employment with SSA and that such indemnification is in the interest of the United States, as determined by the Commissioner, or his or her designee, in his or her discretion.
( b ) SSA may settle or compromise a personal damage claim against its employee by the payment of available funds, at any time, provided the alleged conduct giving rise to the personal damage claim was taken within the scope of employment and that such settlement or compromise is in the interest of the United States, as determined by the Commissioner, or his or her designee, in his or her discretion.
( c ) Absent exceptional circumstances, as determined by the Commissioner or his or her designee, SSA will not entertain a request either to agree to indemnify or to settle a personal damage claim before entry of an adverse verdict, judgment or monetary award.
( d ) When an employee of SSA becomes aware that an action has been filed against the employee in his or her individual capacity as a result of conduct taken within the scope of his or her employment, the employee should immediately notify SSA that such an action is pending.
( e ) The employee may, thereafter, request either: ( 1 ) Indemnification to satisfy a verdict, judgment or award entered against the employee; or
( 2 ) Payment to satisfy the requirements of a settlement proposal. The employee shall submit a written request, with documentation including copies of the verdict, judgment, award or settlement proposal, as appropriate, to the Deputy Commissioner or other designated official, who shall thereupon submit to the General Counsel, in a timely manner, a recommended disposition of the request. The General Counsel shall also seek the views of the Department of Justice. The General Counsel shall forward the request, the Deputy Commissioner's or other designated official's recommended disposition, and the General Counsel's recommendation to the Commissioner or his or her designee for decision.
( f ) Any payment under this section either to indemnify an SSA employee or to settle a personal damage claim shall be contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds.
[62 FR 39935, July 25, 1997]
### §2656e. Terrorism-related travel advisories

The Secretary of State shall promptly advise the Congress whenever the Department of State issues a travel advisory, or other public warning notice for United States citizens traveling abroad, because of a terrorist threat or other security concern.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title V, §505, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 871.)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Smith Barney Bristol Energy Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry Pascucci

|
|
|
|

Jerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director

March 31, 2008

|
|
|
|

Date

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 (the Report) of Immucor, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



|                |  |                        
|--------------- |  | -----------------------
|October 2, 2009 |  | /s/ Richard A. Flynt   
|                |  | Richard A. Flynt       
|                |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1
------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Annual Report of High Plains Gas, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent M. Cook, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


     /s/ Brent M. Cook
     -----------------
Brent M. Cook
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
     April 15, 2011
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

(LAIDLAW LETTERHEAD)


July 15, 2003


Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.   20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q of
Laidlaw International, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended May 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2003 (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, that, to
such officer's knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




/s/ Kevin E. Benson
----------------------------------------------------------
Name:    Kevin E. Benson
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



/s/ Douglas A. Carty
----------------------------------------------------------
Name:    Douglas A. Carty
Title:   Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 620.5 Conformity and substantial compliance. ( a ) *In general.* A State law implementing the drug testing of applicants for unemployment compensation must conform with—and the law's administration must substantially comply with—the requirements of this part 620 for purposes of certification under 42 U.S.C. 502(a), governing State eligibility to receive Federal grants for the administration of its UC program.
( b ) *Resolving issues of conformity and substantial compliance.* For the purposes of resolving issues of conformity and substantial compliance with the requirements of this part 620, the provisions of 20 CFR 601.5 apply.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.133 Requirements for agents. ( a ) An agent filing an *Application for Temporary Employment Certification* on behalf of an employer must provide a copy of the agent agreement or other document demonstrating the agent's authority to represent the employer.
( b ) In addition the agent must provide a copy of the MSPA FLC Certificate of Registration, if required under MSPA at 29 U.S.C. 1801 *et seq.,* identifying the specific farm labor contracting activities the agent is authorized to perform.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 105

 113

 109

 105

 105

 106

 105

 103

 104

 105

 105

 104

 102

 98

 97

 99

 104

 106

 105

 102

 101

 108

 107

 109

 114

 114

 113

 112

 111

 110

 110

 80

 81

 83

 92

 96

 93

 92

 93

 93

 97

 99

 93

 81

 80

 84

 84

 84

 87

 89

 86

 85

 88

 90

 92

 91

 90

 90

 89

 90

 93

 92

 92

 95

 98

 101

 102

 103

 101

 100

 100

 102

 103

 101

 95

 93

 92

 93

 94

 97

 98

 96

 95

 98

 101

 103

 106

 106

 105

 104

 104

 104

 104

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2017

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
§ 641.540 What types of training may grantees and sub-recipients provide to SCSEP participants in addition to the training received at a community service assignment? ( a ) In addition to the training provided in a community service assignment, grantees and sub-recipients may arrange skill training provided that it: ( 1 ) Is realistic and consistent with the participants' IEP;
( 2 ) Makes the most effective use of the participant's skills and talents; and
( 3 ) Prepares the participant for unsubsidized employment.
( b ) Training may be provided before or during a community service assignment.
( c ) Training may be in the form of lectures, seminars, classroom instruction, individual instruction, online instruction, and on-the-job experiences. Training may be provided by the grantee or through other arrangements, including but not limited to, arrangements with other workforce development programs such as WIOA. (OAA sec. 502(c)(6)(A)(ii).)
( d ) Grantees and sub-recipients are encouraged to obtain training through locally available resources, including host agencies, at no cost or reduced cost to the SCSEP.
( e ) Grantees and sub-recipients may pay for participant training, including the payment of reasonable costs of instructors, classroom rental, training supplies, materials, equipment, and tuition. (OAA § 502(c)(6)(A)(ii)).
( f ) Participants must be paid wages while in training, as described in § 641.565(a). (OAA § 502(b)(1)(I)).
( g ) As provided in § 641.545, grantees and sub-recipients may pay for costs associated with supportive services, such as transportation, necessary to participate in training. (OAA § 502(b)(1)(L)).
( h ) Nothing in this section prevents or limits participants from engaging in self-development training available through other sources, at their own expense, during hours when not performing their community service assignments.
[75 FR 53812, Sept. 1, 2010, as amended at 82 FR 56883, Dec. 1, 2017]
# C_2012325EN.01001201.xml

| 26.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/12

---

The following information is brought to the attention of ABDOLLAHI Hamed (a.k.a Mustafa Abdullahi), ARBABSIAR Manssor (a.k.a. Mansour Arbabsiar), SHAKURI Ali Gholam and SOLEIMANI Qasem (a.k.a Ghasem Soleymani, a.k.a Qasmi Sulayman, a.k.a Qasem Soleymani, a.k.a Qasem Solaimani, a.k.a Qasem Salimani, a.k.a Qasem Solemani, a.k.a Qasem Sulaimani, a.k.a Qasem Sulemani), included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism listed in Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 542/2012 (1)

1

2012/C 325/03

Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 provides for a freezing of all funds, other financial assets and economic resources belonging to the persons, groups and entities concerned and that no funds, other financial assets and economic resources may be made available to them, whether directly or indirectly.

The Council has been provided with new information relevant to the listing of the abovementioned persons. Having considered this new information, the Council has amended the statements of reasons accordingly.

The persons and groups concerned may submit a request to obtain the updated Council's statement of reasons for maintaining them on the abovementioned list to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| (Attn: CP 931 designations) |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

(Attn: CP 931 designations)

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

Such a request should be submitted within three weeks from the date of publication of this notice.

The persons concerned may submit at any time a request to the Council, together with any supporting documentation, that the decision to include and maintain them on the list should be reconsidered, to the address provided above. Such requests will be considered when they are received. In this respect, the attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the regular review by the Council of the list according to Article 1(6) of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP. In order for requests to be considered at the next review, it should be submitted within three weeks from the date of notification of this notice.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as listed in the Annex to the Regulation in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for essential needs or specific payments in accordance with Article 5(2) of that Regulation. An updated list of competent authorities is available on the web at the following address:

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/external_relations/cfsp/sanctions/measures.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 165, 26.6.2012, p. 12.

1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 966.78

 966.23

 965.65

 965.15

 964.60

 964.10

 963.56

 963.05

 962.59

 962.11

 961.58

 961.05

 960.42

 959.83

 959.29

 958.65

 958.08

 957.49

 956.90

 956.25

 955.47

 954.64

 953.87

 953.04

 952.28

 951.48

 950.70

 949.92

 949.13

 948.43

 2,167.2

 2,157.3

 2,146.8

 2,137.8

 2,128.0

 2,119.1

 2,109.5

 2,100.4

 2,092.3

 2,083.8

 2,074.5

 2,065.2

 2,054.2

 2,043.9

 2,034.4

 2,023.3

 2,013.4

 2,003.2

 1,993.1

 1,981.9

 1,968.6

 1,954.5

 1,941.5

 1,927.5

 1,914.8

 1,901.5

 1,888.6

 1,875.7

 1,862.7

 1,851.3

STORAGE

-10.0

-9.9

-10.5

-9.0

-9.8

-8.9

-9.6

-9.1

-8.1

-8.5

-9.3

-9.3

-11.0

-10.3

-9.4

-11.1

-9.9

-10.2

-10.2

-11.1

-13.3

-14.1

-13.0

-14.0

-12.7

-13.3

-12.9

-12.9

-13.0

-11.4

CHANGE

 2,916

 2,996

 2,503

 2,671

 2,711

 2,784

 2,450

 2,383

 3,002

 1,853

 3,179

 2,695

 2,571

 2,384

 2,398

 2,055

 2,488

 2,581

 2,551

 3,061

 2,731

 2,280

 2,596

 2,805

 3,401

 2,449

 2,378

 2,119

 2,358

 2,987

INFLOW

 7,767

 7,819

 7,571

 7,012

 7,401

 7,105

 7,056

 6,764

 6,914

 5,646

 7,654

 7,160

 7,887

 7,325

 6,964

 7,473

 7,350

 7,557

 7,503

 8,526

 9,192

 9,190

 8,969

 9,665

 9,621

 9,080

 8,739

 8,447

 8,731

 8,558

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 290

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 181

 191

 201

 190

 274

 184

 236

 188

 187

 192

 223

 227

 231

 251

 184

 193

 122

 157

 171

 151

 250

 199

 193

 182

 191

 88

 161

 165

 169

 197

C.F.S.

 .34

 .36

 .38

 .36

 .52

 .35

 .45

 .36

 .36

 .37

 .43

 .44

 .45

 .49

 .36

 .38

 .24

 .31

 .34

 .30

 .50

 .40

 .39

 .37

 .39

 .18

 .33

 .34

 .35

 .41

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2014 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: August 15, 2014

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -325.8 78,336 236,646 0 290 5,729 11.25 .00

ACRE-FEET -325,800 155,379 469,387 0 575 11,363

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 469,387

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 575

 469,962

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2013 32.12

 2,177.2

Table 3
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6190** 

ANTONIO ROMYA BEALE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. MARIE VARGO, Warden, Sussex II State Prison , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00674

- LMB

- JFA )

Submitted : March 26, 2014 Decided: April 4, 2014

Before DIAZ and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Antonio Romya Beale, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Romya Beale seeks to appeal the district
court ’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue ab sent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the dist rict court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner mus t demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Beale has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argu ment would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### §3005. Repealed. Pub. L. 117–81, div. E, title LI, §5114(b)(5), Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 2352

Section, Pub. L. 94–304, §5, June 3, 1976, 90 Stat. 661; Pub. L. 102–138, title I, §171, Oct. 28, 1991, 105 Stat. 679; Pub. L. 107–228, div. A, title II, §226, Sept. 30, 2002, 116 Stat. 1369, required Secretary of State to submit annual report relating to Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Delegation of Functions

Memorandum of President of the United States, Feb. 10, 1992, 57 F.R. 5367, provided:

Memorandum for the Honorable James A. Baker, III, the Secretary of State

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions vested in me by section 5 of Public Law 94–304 (22 U.S.C. 3005). The authority delegated by this memorandum may be further delegated within the Department of State.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

George Bush.
(No. 6675

#### A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed August 10, 1972.*

A-1 Ambulance Service, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Perlin, C.J.
Exhibit 23.5

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



         As   independent   public   accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference in this  Registration  Statement of our report dated
June 13, 2000 with respect to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  Healthworld
Corporation  and  Subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related
consolidated  statements  of  income,  stockholders'  equity  and  comprehensive
income, and cash flows for the three years in the period then ended December 31,
1999, which report is included in the Form 6-K filed by Cordiant  Communications
Group plc on September 25, 2000,  and to all  references to our Firm included in
this Registration Statement.



Arthur Andersen LLP





Melville, New York

September 25, 2000
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis Loffredo, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Kings County, convicting the appellant of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the first degree and assault in the second degree, and imposing sentence, unanimously affirmed. Ho opinion. Present — ■ Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
### §276c–3. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–240, title V, §541(d)(7), Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2518

Section, Pub. L. 98–181, title I [title X, §1006], Nov. 30, 1983, 97 Stat. 1287, related to personnel practices at the Inter-American Development Bank, Asian Development Bank, and African Development Bank.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 52-027 and 52-028; NRC-2008-0441]

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Patricia Vokoun, Environmental Projects Branch 2, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Mail Stop T7-E30, Washington, DC 20555-0001. Ms. Vokoun may be contacted by telephone at 301-415-3470 or via e-mail to                         *Patricia.Vokoun@nrc.gov.*

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 15th day of April 2011.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Gregory Hatchett,

Acting Deputy Director, Division of Site and Environmental Reviews, Office of New Reactors.

[FR Doc. 2011-9834 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P