alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
69–008 

115TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 1st Session 115–252 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE JOINT RESOLUTION (H.J. RES. 

111) PROVIDING FOR CONGRESSIONAL DISAPPROVAL UNDER CHAPTER 

8 OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, OF THE RULE SUBMITTED BY BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION RELATING TO ‘‘ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS’’ 

JULY 24, 2017.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BUCK, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 468] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 468, by a record vote of 9 to 4, report the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.J. Res. 111, providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 

United States Code, of the rule submitted by Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection relating to ‘‘Arbitration Agreements’’’, under a 

closed rule. The resolution provides one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Financial Services. The resolution waives all 

points of order against consideration of the joint resolution. The 

resolution provides that the joint resolution shall be considered as 

read. The resolution waives all points of order against provisions 

in the joint resolution. The resolution provides one motion to recommit. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

Although the resolution waives all points of order against consideration of the joint resolution, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

Although the resolution waives all points of order against provisions in the joint resolution, the Committee is not aware of any 

points of order. The waiver is prophylactic in nature. 

2 

COMMITTEE VOTES

The results of each record vote on an amendment or motion to 

report, together with the names of those voting for and against, are 

printed below: 

Rules Committee record vote No. 80 

Motion by Mr. Cole to report the rule. Adopted: 9–4 

Majority Members Vote Minority Members Vote 

Mr. Cole ............................................................ Yea Ms. Slaughter .................................................. Nay 

Mr. Woodall ...................................................... Yea Mr. McGovern ................................................... Nay 

Mr. Burgess ...................................................... Yea Mr. Hastings of Florida ................................... Nay 

Mr. Collins ........................................................ Yea Mr. Polis ........................................................... Nay 

Mr. Byrne .......................................................... Yea 

Mr. Newhouse ................................................... Yea 

Mr. Buck ........................................................... Yea 

Ms. Cheney ....................................................... Yea 

Mr. Sessions, Chairman ................................... Yea 

Æ
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00206-CR

Eduardo Espinoza

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1267998R)

September 18, 2014

Opinion by Justice McCoy

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bob McCoy____________________

 Justice Bob McCoy
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 4,722

 4,315

 4,574

 3,825

 4,097

 3,709

 4,002

 3,722

 4,038

 3,627

 855

 4,420

 3,710

 2,922

 2,292

 3,391

 3,986

 3,449

 3,515

 2,845

 3,641

 3,258

 1,925

 3,704

 3,344

 3,725

 4,230

 3,416

 3,295

 3,070

 3,682

 89,989

 89,975

 89,576

 89,442

 88,604

 88,066

 87,186

 86,629

 85,833

 85,377

 84,554

 81,139

 81,281

 80,741

 79,480

 77,684

 77,021

 76,956

 76,385

 75,905

 74,813

 74,531

 73,900

 72,033

 71,950

 71,530

 71,492

 71,936

 71,584

 71,135

 70,495

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2017 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: September 8, 2017

 94,711

 94,290

 94,150

 93,267

 92,701

 91,775

 91,188

 90,351

 89,871

 89,004

 85,409

 85,559

 84,991

 83,663

 81,772

 81,075

 81,007

 80,405

 79,900

 78,750

 78,454

 77,789

 75,825

 75,737

 75,294

 75,255

 75,722

 75,352

 74,879

 74,205

 74,177

 5,831,000

 5,809,000

 5,788,000

 5,767,000

 5,745,000

 5,724,000

 5,703,000

 5,682,000

 5,660,000

 5,639,000

 5,618,000

 5,596,000

 5,575,000

 5,554,000

 5,532,000

 5,511,000

 5,490,000

 5,468,000

 5,447,000

 5,426,000

 5,404,000

 5,383,000

 5,362,000

 5,341,000

 5,319,000

 5,298,000

 5,277,000

 5,255,000

 5,234,000

 5,213,000

 5,191,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 94,725
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 25109]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10259]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 3

RIN 2900-AN46

Notice of Information and Evidence Necessary To Substantiate 
Claim

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In a document published in the Federal Register on December 
11, 2009, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to amend its 
regulations regarding VA's duty to notify a claimant of the information 
and evidence necessary to substantiate a claim. This document withdraws 
that proposed rule.

DATES: The proposed rule is withdrawn as of April 27, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah W. Fusina, Legal Consultant, 
Regulations Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans 
Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont 
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9700. (This is not a toll-
free number.)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On December 11, 2009, VA published a 
proposed rule in the Federal Register (74 FR 65702), notifying the 
public of VA's intent to amend its regulations regarding its duty to 
notify a claimant of information and evidence necessary to substantiate 
a claim. The purpose was to implement the Veterans' Benefits 
Improvement Act of 2008, which required the promulgation of regulations 
prescribing the requirements relating to the content of notice to be 
provided under 38 U.S.C. 5103(a). Public Law 110-389, 122 Stat. 4145, 
4147. VA received several comments raising concerns with the proposed 
rule, including concerns relating to the establishment of effective 
dates, the clarity of what types of evidence are accepted, the 
specificity of the contents for notice, and the general clarity and 
consistency of the text of the proposed rule. Based on consideration of 
comments received on the proposed rule and further evaluation of 
available options, VA intends to propose revised rules warranting a new 
notice of proposed rulemaking and public-comment period. Thus, VA is 
withdrawing the proposed rule.

    Approved: April 19, 2012.
John R. Gingrich,
 Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-10259 Filed 4-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### Benjamin D. Lucas *v.*Oliver Beebe.

*Appearance—waiver of right to have appeal dismissed.*Where a party, in attempting to appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace on the trial of the right of property, did not file his appeal bond until after the expiration of five days, and the appellee appeared in the circuit court, and moved the court to dismiss the appeal for want of an appeal bond, and after cross-motion for leave to amend the bond, moved to dismiss the appeal, it was *held,*that the right to have the appeal dismissed was not waived.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean county.

This was an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, by Benjamin D. Lucas. The defendant, Beebe, appeared and moved the court to dismiss the appeal for want of a sufficient appeal bond, whereupon the plaintiff entered a cross-motion for leave to amend the bond, and to dismiss the suit. The court then dismissed the appeal on defendant’s motion, because it had not been perfected in time.

Mr. Edmond O’Connell, for the appellant

Mr. Jesse Birch, for the appellee.

*368Per Curiam :

This was a proceeding before a justice of the peace, for the trial of the right of property, under our statute. Lucas attempted to appeal to the circuit court, but did not file his appeal bond until after the expiration of five days from the entry of judgment.

Beebe appeared in the circuit court, and moved to dismiss the appeal. The motion was sustained by the court and the appeal dismissed, and from this judgment Lucas appeals to this court.

The only point made by counsel for appellant is, that Beebe having entered his appearance, (counsel insists, a general appearance in the circuit court) could not be allowed to move to dismiss the appeal—that the appearance was such as waived all objections as to the mode of removing the cause to the circuit court.

In this position we can not concur. By a fair construction of the words of the record, we think Beebe had not waived his right to make this motion.

The judgment must be affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### § 73.10 What does subpart B cover?

This subpart provides the conditions under which TTB will allow you to use electronic signatures executed to electronic forms instead of traditional handwritten signatures executed on paper forms. Where electronic signatures and their associated electronic forms meet the requirements of this part, TTB will consider the electronic signatures to be the equivalent of full handwritten signatures, initials, and other general signings this chapter requires.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Constance Varrichio, Appellant, against John Bertanzel, Respondent.

In a filiation proceeding, final order of the Children’s Court of Nassau County dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Present — Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Johns ton, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
----

----

|   | (1) | The Registrant’s Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Michael V. Shustek          |
|---------------------------------|
| Michael V. Shustek              |
| Chief Executive Officer         |
| Vestin Realty Mortgage II, Inc. |

| /s/ Rocio Revollo               |
|---------------------------------|
| Rocio Revollo                   |
| Chief Financial Officer         |
| Vestin Realty Mortgage II, Inc. |
### §290o–3. Federal Reserve Banks as depositories

Any Federal Reserve Bank which is requested to do so by the Bank may act as its depository, or as its fiscal agent, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall exercise general supervision over the carrying out of these functions.

(Pub. L. 104–208, div. A, title I, §101(c) [title VII, §705], Sept. 30, 1996, 110 Stat. 3009–121, 3009–179.)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 958.14

 964.70

 969.21

 972.54

 975.02

 976.93

 978.60

 979.90

 981.10

 982.14

 982.96

 983.75

 984.35

 984.90

 985.70

 988.21

 990.33

 991.82

 992.94

 993.99

 995.28

 996.44

 997.23

 998.00

 998.87

 999.57

 1,000.18

 1,000.86

 1,001.46

 1,001.92

 1,002.38

 2,014.5

 2,129.8

 2,211.6

 2,273.3

 2,320.1

 2,356.6

 2,388.8

 2,414.1

 2,437.5

 2,458.0

 2,474.2

 2,490.0

 2,501.9

 2,512.9

 2,529.0

 2,579.9

 2,623.4

 2,654.3

 2,677.7

 2,699.8

 2,727.1

 2,751.8

 2,768.7

 2,785.2

 2,804.0

 2,819.2

 2,832.5

 2,847.3

 2,860.4

 2,870.5

 2,880.6

STORAGE

+54.0

+115.3

+81.8

+61.8

+46.8

+36.5

+32.2

+25.3

+23.5

+20.5

+16.2

+15.7

+12.0

+11.0

+16.1

+50.9

+43.5

+30.9

+23.4

+22.1

+27.3

+24.7

+16.9

+16.5

+18.8

+15.2

+13.3

+14.8

+13.1

+10.1

+10.1

CHANGE

 28,149

 58,721

 42,100

 31,947

 24,103

 18,881

 16,837

 13,263

 12,446

 12,034

 10,042

 11,004

 9,037

 8,501

 11,050

 28,353

 24,970

 18,236

 14,327

 13,294

 16,115

 14,904

 11,016

 11,468

 11,927

 10,923

 9,994

 10,422

 9,484

 8,329

 8,295

INFLOW

 916

 564

 860

 795

 519

 479

 498

 487

 565

 1,660

 1,818

 2,931

 2,929

 2,889

 2,932

 2,682

 2,987

 2,601

 2,203

 2,097

 2,236

 2,439

 2,431

 3,072

 2,379

 3,134

 3,195

 2,829

 2,788

 3,035

 3,094

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 201

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 5

 16

 16

 11

 11

 11

 91

 29

 46

 52

 47

 152

 71

 65

 12

 12

 30

 55

 129

 74

 119

 13

 63

 57

 76

 134

 115

 122

 77

 213

 97

C.F.S.

 .01

 .03

 .03

 .02

 .02

 .02

 .16

 .05

 .08

 .09

 .08

 .26

 .12

 .11

 .02

 .02

 .05

 .09

 .21

 .12

 .19

 .02

 .10

 .09

 .12

 .21

 .18

 .19

 .12

 .33

 .15

INCHES

 .60

 2.84

 .26

 .90

 .14

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .16

 1.62

 .20

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.71

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MARCH 2009 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: April 1, 2009

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +920.3 530,172 64,044 0 201 2,021 3.29 8.43

ACRE-FEET +920,300 1,051,596 127,031 0 399 4,009

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 127,031

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 399

 127,430

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 8.43

JULY 1, 2008 41.76

 1,960.5
Editorial Note on Part 602
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 602 appear at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006.

§ 602.11 Secretary's interpretation. ( a ) The Secretary interprets section 303(a)(1), SSA, to require that a State law provide for such methods of administration as will reasonably ensure the prompt and full payment of unemployment benefits to eligible claimants, and collection and handling of income for the State unemployment fund (particularly taxes and reimbursements), with the greatest accuracy feasible.
( b ) The Secretary interprets sections 303(a)(1) and 303(a)(6), SSA, to authorize the Department of Labor to prescribe standard definitions, methods and procedures, and reporting requirements for the QC program and to ensure accuracy and verification of QC findings.
( c ) The Secretary interprets section 303(b)(2), SSA to require that, in the administration of a State law, there shall be substantial compliance with the provisions required by sections 303(a) (1) and (6). Further, conformity of the State law with those requirements is required by section 303(a) and § 601.5(a) of this chapter.
( d ) To satisfy the requirements of sections 303(a) (1) and (6), a State law must contain a provision requiring, or which is construed to require, the establishment and maintenance of a QC program in accordance with the requirements of this part. The establishment and maintenance of such a QC program in accordance with this part shall not require any change in State law concerning authority to undertake redeterminations of claims or liabilities or the finality of any determination, redetermination or decision.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 74

 70

 82

 74

 69

 78

 68

 69

 70

 77

 71

 69

 66

 67

 85

 89

 96

 88

 89

 98

 86

 87

 96

 93

 98

 121

 104

 111

 95

 101

 118

 66

 66

 65

 60

 60

 61

 61

 62

 65

 66

 67

 63

 63

 64

 64

 81

 81

 80

 83

 80

 78

 79

 83

 84

 83

 81

 83

 82

 85

 88

 87

 69

 68

 68

 65

 62

 63

 63

 65

 67

 69

 69

 66

 64

 65

 74

 84

 86

 84

 85

 86

 82

 83

 87

 87

 85

 85

 86

 86

 88

 92

 90

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: September 2, 2008

HIGH LOW MEAN

 74.9

 75.6

 74.9

 74.7

 74.2

 74.4

 74.7

 74.4

 74.4

 74.7

 75.7

 76.0

 76.5

 77.4

 77.9

 78.4

 77.0

 75.7

 73.9

 74.5

 75.7

 76.3

 77.0

 77.2

 76.9

 75.8

 76.2

 77.0

 77.9

 77.7

 74.5

 69.5

 70.4

 69.8

 69.8

 70.0

 69.7

 69.9

 69.5

 69.0

 69.4

 71.0

 70.8

 71.2

 72.3

 72.4

 73.6

 72.2

 71.1

 70.0

 68.9

 70.9

 70.9

 71.5

 71.7

 72.0

 70.6

 70.7

 71.5

 72.5

 72.3

 70.1

 72.2

 72.9

 72.4

 72.2

 72.1

 72.1

 72.3

 71.9

 71.7

 72.0

 74.2

 73.4

 73.9

 74.9

 75.1

 75.8

 74.7

 73.6

 71.8

 71.6

 73.0

 73.5

 74.2

 74.4

 74.3

 73.2

 73.4

 74.1

 75.0

 74.9

 72.5

HIGH LOW MEAN

 7.4

 7.2

 7.1

 8.3

 8.5

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.4

 8.4

 8.3

 8.5

 8.6

 8.8

 8.9

 8.7

 8.7

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.5

 8.4

 8.7

 7.0

 6.7

 6.7

 6.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.2

 8.2

 8.2

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.6

 7.8

 7.9

 8.0

 7.9

 7.8

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.7

 7.8

 7.7

 7.6

 7.6

 7.2

 7.0

 6.9

 7.7

 8.2

 8.3

 8.3

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.4

 8.3

 8.3

 8.1

 8.1

 7.9

 8.0

 8.1

 8.3

 8.3

 8.2

 8.1

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.0

 8.1

 8.1

 8.0

 7.9

 8.1

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
#### § 418.1345 Is reopening of an initial or reconsidered determination made by us ever appropriate?

We may reopen an initial or reconsidered determination made by us when the conditions for reopening are met as described in § 404.988 of this chapter. We will use the rules in §§ 404.987 through 404.991a of this chapter when we reopen determinations made by us.
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Geology of the Iniskin-Tuxedni region, Alaska

#### Professional Paper 512

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 3**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 4**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 5**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 6**                                
    (pdf)
- Preceding Publications:
- Geologic 
    map and structure sections of the Iniskin Peninsula and adjacent area of 
    Alaska (1954)
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp512 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 02, 
2012 00:05:51