alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 2022

STORAGE COMPUTED* RELEASE - C.F.S.

 1000 ACRE - FEET INFLOW RIVER EVAPORATION PRECIP

DAY ELEV IN LAKE CHANGE C.F.S. POWER SPILL OUTLET C. F. S. INCHES INCHES

1,808.2

1 945.84 1,809.3 1.1 3,282 2,589 0 0 128 0.27 0.00

2 945.85 1,809.5 0.2 3,160 2,937 0 0 142 0.30 0.00

3 945.92 1,810.6 1.1 3,370 2,663 0 0 142 0.30 0.00

4 946.03 1,812.4 1.8 3,774 2,742 0 0 142 0.30 0.00

5 946.44 1,819.0 6.6 7,008 3,505 0 0 171 0.36 0.00

6 946.34 1,817.4 -1.6 2,362 3,175 0 0 0 0.00 0.02

7 946.28 1,816.4 -1.0 2,454 2,828 0 0 114 0.24 0.01

8 946.26 1,816.1 -0.3 2,939 2,997 0 0 104 0.22 0.00

9 946.57 1,821.1 5.0 5,477 2,862 0 0 95 0.20 0.00

10 946.58 1,821.3 0.2 3,200 3,095 0 0 24 0.05 0.00

11 946.53 1,820.5 -0.8 3,012 3,390 0 0 28 0.06 0.15

12 946.57 1,821.1 0.6 3,133 2,737 0 0 71 0.15 0.00

13 946.65 1,822.4 1.3 3,988 3,186 0 0 152 0.32 0.00

14 946.78 1,824.5 2.1 4,470 3,304 0 0 109 0.23 0.00

15 946.75 1,824.0 -0.5 3,151 3,276 0 0 119 0.25 0.00

16 946.70 1,823.2 -0.8 3,105 3,346 0 0 166 0.35 0.00

17 946.67 1,822.7 -0.5 3,153 3,245 0 0 152 0.32 0.00

18 946.66 1,822.5 -0.2 3,088 3,012 0 0 157 0.33 0.00

19 946.63 1,822.1 -0.5 3,134 3,188 0 0 190 0.40 0.00

20 946.95 1,827.2 5.2 5,475 2,698 0 0 176 0.37 0.00

21 946.95 1,827.2 0.0 3,635 3,478 0 0 157 0.33 0.00

22 946.85 1,825.6 -1.6 2,332 3,007 0 0 138 0.29 0.00

23 946.67 1,822.7 -2.9 2,195 3,515 0 0 143 0.30 0.00

24 946.56 1,820.9 -1.8 3,153 3,904 0 0 143 0.30 0.00

25 946.45 1,819.2 -1.8 3,068 3,820 0 0 142 0.30 0.00

26 946.47 1,819.5 0.3 3,078 2,702 0 0 214 0.45 0.00

27 946.39 1,818.2 -1.3 3,010 3,518 0 0 142 0.30 0.00

28 946.40 1,818.4 0.2 3,217 3,055 0 0 81 0.17 0.00

29 946.25 1,815.9 -2.4 2,941 4,098 0 0 62 0.13 0.12

30 946.20 1,815.1 -0.8 2,607 2,853 0 0 161 0.34 0.00

31 946.20 1,815.1 0.0 3,759 3,598 0 0 161 0.34 0.00

TOTALS 6.9 105,730 98,323 0 0 3,926 8.27 0.30

ACRE-FEET 6,900 209,715 195,024 0 0 7,787

Comments: * COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES, PUMPING AND EVAPORATION

Release (ACRE-FEET)

Power 195,024 Outlet 0

Spill 0 Total 195,024

Precipitation

This month = 0.30

October 01, 2021 To date = 40.22

SUMMARY

Historical Archive and Report Database

Shasta Lake Daily Operations

Run Date: 4/19/2023
[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 24976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs


Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed Wheatgrass Ridge 
Wind Project, Fort Hall Indian Reservation, Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) 
intends to cancel all work on the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 
for the proposed Wheatgrass Ridge Wind Project on the Fort Hall Indian 
Reservation, Idaho.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. B. J. Howerton, Environmental 
Services Manager, telephone (503) 231-6749.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The BIA is canceling work on this EIS 
because the proponent of the Wheatgrass Ridge Wind Project, the 
Wheatgrass Ridge Wind, LLC., has formally withdrawn the proposal. The 
notice of intent to prepare the EIS, which included a description of 
the proposed action, was published in the Federal Register on June 2, 
2011 (76 FR 31975). The Draft EIS had not been published.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Donald E. Laverdure,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-10080 Filed 4-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-W7-P
### §256. Jurisdiction of consular officers in disputes between seamen

Whenever it is stipulated by treaty or convention between the United States and any foreign nation that the consul general, consuls, vice consuls, or consular or commercial agents of each nation, shall have exclusive jurisdiction of controversies, difficulties, or disorders arising at sea or in the waters or ports of the other nation, between the master or officers and any of the crew, or between any of the crew themselves, of any vessel belonging to the nation represented by such consular officer, such stipulations shall be executed and enforced within the jurisdiction of the United States as declared in sections 257 and 258 of this title. But before this section shall take effect as to the vessels of any particular nation having such treaty with the United States, the President shall be satisfied that similar provisions have been made for the execution of such treaty by the other contracting party, and shall issue his proclamation to that effect, declaring this section to be in force as to such nation.

(R.S. §4079.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

R.S. §4079 derived from act June 11, 1864, ch. 116, §1, 13 Stat. 121.
(No. 6471

#### Merck, Sharp and Dohme, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Mental Health, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 3, 1973.*

Merck, Sharp and Dohme, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund III and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      33,783,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  190,750<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,819,218<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,819,218<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             (277,923)<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,890,526
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,168,449)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,168,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,168,449)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $112,952 and due from
DWR of $77,798.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $984,033 and net option
premiums of $(139,169).
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $277,651, accrued management
fees of $115,137 and accrued administrative expenses of $162,942.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $(183,542), net
change in unrealized of $(1,118,777) and interest income of $1,024,396.
</FN>


</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

General Dynamics ) 

) 

Under Contract No. N00024-98-C-8503 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60679 

D. Joe Smith, Esq. 

Matthew L. Haws, Esq. 

Edward Jackson, Esq. 

Grant B. Schweikert, Esq. 

Jenner & Block LLP 

Washington, DC 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Robyn L. Hamady, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 25 April 2017 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60679, Appeal of General Dynamics, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 31

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Tommy Harris, Senior Vice President of CitiMortgage Inc., certify that:


1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
 Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of
periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of Citigroup
Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc., Series 2005-HE1

2.      Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3.      Based upon my knowledge, the servicing information required to be
provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement is included in these reports;

4.      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the pooling and
servicing agreements, and except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and

5.      The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the
report provided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a
review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement that is included in these reports;

6.      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Countrywide
Home Loans, Inc. and Homeq Servicing Corporation.



Date: March 22, 2006


_______/S/_________
Name:  Tommy Harris

Title:  Master Servicing Division
          Senior Vice President
#### § 375.4 Mailing instructions.

In a national emergency as defined in § 375.2, all mail shall be directed to Board offices at their normal locations.

[40 FR 52844, Nov. 13, 1975]
###### Editorial Note on Part 602

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 602 appear at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006.

#### § 602.20 Organization.

Each State shall establish a QC unit independent of, and not accountable to, any unit performing functions subject to evaluation by the QC unit. The organizational location of this unit shall be positioned to maximize its objectivity, to facilitate its access to information necessary to carry out its responsibilities, and to minimize organizational conflict of interest.
§ 404.1662 What support we will provide. Performance support may include, but is not limited to, any or all of the following: ( a ) An onsite review of cases processed by the State agency emphasizing adherence to written guidelines.
( b ) A request that necessary administrative measures be implemented (e.g., filling staffing vacancies, using overtime, assisting with training activities, etc.).
( c ) Provisions for Federal personnel to perform onsite reviews, conduct training, or perform other functions needed to improve performance.
( d ) Provisions for fiscal aid to allow for overtime, temporary hiring of additional staff, etc., above the authorized budget.
[56 FR 11020, Mar. 14, 1991]
#### William Emett, Appellant, v. Inter-City Garage, Inc., Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-15660

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:09-cv-00261-CEH-DNF

JAMES D. SELELYO ,

STEPHANIE P. SELELYO,

Plaintiffs–Appellants,

versus

ALFREDO J. SARARO, III, 

SARARO HOLDINGS, LLC,

ALANA SARARO,

FIFTH THIRD BANK,

Defendants–Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(November 21, 2012)

Before BARKETT and JORDAN, Circuit Judges, and HALL,* District Judge.

 

* Honorable James Randal Hall, United States District Judge for the Southern District of 

Georgia, sitting by designation. 

Case: 11-15660 Date Filed: 11/21/2012 Page: 1 of 2 
2

PER CURIAM:

James and Stephanie Selelyo appeal a district court order dismissing their 

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) claim against Alfredo

J. Sararo, III, Sararo Holdings, LLC, Alana Sararo, and Fifth Third Bank.1

 Having 

reviewed the record and considered the oral argument of counsel, the district 

court’s dismissal of the Selelyos’ RICO claim is AFFIRMED.

 1 The Selelyos waived any appeal of their pendent state law claims by failing to raise those 

claims in their brief. See Hamilton v. Southland Christian School, Inc., 680 F.3d 1316, 1319 

(11th Cir. 2012). 

Case: 11-15660 Date Filed: 11/21/2012 Page: 2 of 2
#### Roger Heggblom, an Infant, by Arthur F. Roach, His Guardian ad Litem, et al., Appellants, v. John Wanamaker New York, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [178 Misc. 792.]
Figure 1.2. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the downstream vicinity of 63rd Street.

94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8 NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 16,740 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 752 feet

0

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

50 100 150 200 METERS

39°00'50"

39°01'10"

39°01'

Hardesty

Avenue

63rd Street

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF J. BAKER, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 30, 1999 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,679,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,932,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,000
<INVENTORY>                                164,057,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           188,615,715
<PP&E>                                     122,604,736
<DEPRECIATION>                              54,109,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             324,034,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,526,928
<BONDS>                                    174,582,825
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,032,263
<OTHER-SE>                                  71,151,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               324,034,659
<SALES>                                    584,276,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           584,276,206
<CGS>                                      324,359,899
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              324,359,899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          14,531,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,177,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,144,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,033,518
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,033,518
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
        

</TABLE>
489 P.2d 659

#### The MESCALERO APACHE TRIBE, Petitioner, v. Franklin JONES, Commissioner of the Bureau of Revenue of the State of New Mexico, and the Bureau of Revenue of the State of New Mexico, Respondents.

No. 9331.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

Oct. 6, 1971.

Further ordered that the record in Court of Appeals Cause No. 653, 83 N.M. 158, 489 P.2d 666, be and the same is hereby returned to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals.
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22704-22705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9788]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: April 18, 2011.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         FDIC Ref. No.                  Bank name                 City                State         Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10353..........................  Bartow County Bank....  Cartersville.........  GA                    04/15/2011
10354..........................  Heritage Banking Group  Carthage.............  MS                    04/15/2011
10355..........................  New Horizons Bank.....  East Ellijay.........  GA                    04/15/2011

[[Page 22705]]

 
10356..........................  Nexity Bank...........  Birmingham...........  AL                    04/15/2011
10357..........................  Rosemount National      Rosemount............  MN                    04/15/2011
                                  Bank.
10358..........................  Superior Bank.........  Birmingham...........  AL                    04/15/2011
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2011-9788 Filed 4-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 0 0 0

2 0 0 0

3 0 0 0

4 0 0 0

5 0 0 0

6 0 0 0

7 0 0 0

8 0 0 0

9 0 0 0

10 0 0 0

11 0 0 0

12 0 0 0

13 0 0 0

14 0 0 0

15 0 0 0

16 0 0 0

17 0 0 0

18 0 0 0

19 0 0 0

20 0 0 0

21 0 0 0

22 0 0 0

23 0 0 0

24 0 0 0

25 0 0 0

26 0 0 0

27 0 0 0

28 0 0 0

29 0 0 0

30 0 0 0

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

Pittsburg Bottom On The Sacramento River

Period: April 2023 Run Date: 11/27/2023
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1825** 

CAROLYN DE GUZMAN , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. NIH FEDERAL CREDIT UNION , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 8:08

- cv - 03213

- PJM )

Submitted : October 19, 2010 Decided: October 25, 2010

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Caro lyn de Guzman, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey William Larroca, ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Carolyn de Guzman appeals the district cour t ’ s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on her employment discrimination and retaliation claims . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Guzman v. NIH Fed
. Credit Union , No. 8:08

- cv - 03213

- PJM (D. Md. July 14, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIR MED
### -78 -77 -76 -75 -74
38 39 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/24 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 24 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●