alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4298 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to place in Arlington National Cemetery 

a memorial honoring the helicopter pilots and crew members of the 

Vietnam era, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. AMODEI (for himself and Mr. CARTER of Texas) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in 

addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Army to place in Arlington 

National Cemetery a memorial honoring the helicopter 

pilots and crew members of the Vietnam era, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vietnam Helicopter 

5 Crew Memorial Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4298 IH

1 SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF MEMORIAL HONORING HELI2 COPTER PILOTS DURING THE VIETNAM WAR. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of 

4 section (c), the Secretary of the Army shall place in Ar5 lington National Cemetery a memorial honoring helicopter 

6 pilots and crew members who served on active duty in the 

7 Armed Forces during the Vietnam era. 

8 (b) DESIGN.—The memorial placed under subsection 

9 (a) shall measure 4 feet in height, 5 feet in width, and 

10 1 foot in depth, and shall be based on a design approved 

11 by the Secretary of the Army and the Vietnam Helicopter 

12 Pilots Association. 

13 (c) AGREEMENT FOR UPKEEP AND MAINTENANCE.— 

14 The Secretary of the Army may only place a memorial 

15 under subsection (a) if the Secretary enters into an agree16 ment with the Vietnam Helicopter Pilots Association 

17 under which the Association agrees to pay all costs nec18 essary to construct, install, and maintain the memorial, 

19 and to such other provisions as the Secretary may require. 

20 (d) APPROVAL OF SITE.—The Secretary of the Army 

21 shall approve an appropriate site within Arlington Na22 tional Cemetery for the memorial under subsection (a) to 

23 be placed. 

24 (e) WAIVER OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.— 

25 Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 4298 IH

1 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332) shall not apply with respect to the 

2 memorial placed under subsection (a). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 362.12 Computation of amount of reimbursement. ( a ) The amount awarded with regard to any item of personal property will not exceed its depreciated replacement cost at the time of loss. Unless proven to be otherwise, replacement cost will be based on the price paid in cash for the property or, if not acquired by purchase or exchange, the value at the time of acquisition. The amount normally payable on property damaged beyond economical repair is found by determining its depreciated value immediately before it was damaged or lost, less any salvage value. If the cost of repair is less than the depreciated value of the property, then it is economically repairable, and the cost of repair is the amount payable.
( b ) Depreciation in value of an item of personal property is determined by considering the type of article involved, its cost, condition when lost or damaged beyond economical repair, and the time elapsed between the date of acquisition and the date of accrual of the claim.
( c ) Allowance for articles acquired by barter will not exceed the cost of the articles tendered in barter.
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-204490) pertaining to the Sundance Employee Option Plan and Sundance Energy Australia Limited Long Term Incentive Plan of Sundance Energy Australia Limited of our report dated May 2, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Sundance Energy Australia Limited, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 
| /s/ Ernst & Young     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| 680 George Street         |
| Sydney NSW 2000 Australia |
|                      |
| May 2, 2016          |

 

----
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Coconut Palm Acquisition Corp.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ ROBERT C. FARENHEMName:
    
    Robert C. FarenhemTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Linn Energy, LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, KoljaRockov, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/  KOLJA ROCKOV                                |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Kolja Rockov                                          |
|   | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

Date: February 28,2008

 

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY

 1,516

 3,109

 1,982

 3,641

 3,904

 2,282

 2,950

 2,887

 2,975

 3,490

 3,916

 2,809

 2,786

 2,676

 3,272

 3,470

 2,548

 3,736

 3,017

 3,542

 4,456

 6,091

 6,887

 3,993

 5,384

 1,889

 4,684

 4,090

 9,013

 5,183

 63,983

 62,224

 62,067

 60,846

 61,263

 61,909

 60,981

 60,735

 60,440

 60,245

 60,548

 61,241

 60,847

 60,452

 59,971

 60,081

 60,374

 59,775

 60,336

 60,185

 60,541

 61,747

 64,446

 67,766

 68,171

 69,878

 68,178

 69,219

 69,644

 74,724

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2018 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: December 12, 2018

 65,499

 65,333

 64,049

 64,487

 65,167

 64,191

 63,931

 63,622

 63,415

 63,735

 64,464

 64,050

 63,633

 63,128

 63,243

 63,551

 62,922

 63,511

 63,353

 63,727

 64,997

 67,838

 71,333

 71,759

 73,555

 71,767

 72,862

 73,309

 78,657

 79,907

 3,870,000

 3,849,000

 3,827,000

 3,806,000

 3,785,000

 3,763,000

 3,742,000

 3,721,000

 3,700,000

 3,678,000

 3,657,000

 3,636,000

 3,614,000

 3,593,000

 3,572,000

 3,550,000

 3,529,000

 3,508,000

 3,486,000

 3,465,000

 3,444,000

 3,422,000

 3,401,000

 3,380,000

 3,359,000

 3,337,000

 3,316,000

 3,295,000

 3,273,000

 3,252,000

 SHASTA 

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 67,351
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130084 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130084 COA: 262021 Wayne CC: 90-009382 DESMOND ANDERE WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to a ppeal the October 20, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.428 Eligible individual without an eligible spouse has an essential person in his home.

When an eligible individual without an eligible spouse has an essential person (as defined in § 416.222 of this part) in his home, the amount by which his rate of payment is increased is determined in accordance with §§ 416.220 through 416.223 and with 416.413 of this part. The essential person's income is deemed to be that of the eligible individual, and the provisions of §§ 416.401 through 416.426 will apply in determining the benefit of such eligible individual.

[39 FR 23053, June 26, 1974, as amended at 51 FR 10616, Mar. 28, 1986; 65 FR 16814, Mar. 30, 2000]
(No. 73-CC-370

#### Glenn Walker, J., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Public Aid, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 25, 1974.*

Glenn Walker, Jr., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7406** 

ROSS E. TURNER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; HAROLD CLARKE, or successor (Director Dept. of Corrections); R.C. MATHENA, or successor (Warden, Red Onion State Prison) , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Arenda L. Wright Allen , District Judge. ( 2:12

- cv - 00680

- AWA

- DEM )

Submitted : January 23, 2014 Decided: January 27, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Ross E. Turner , Appellant Pro Se. Aaron Jennings Campbell , OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA , Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ross E. Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying reli ef on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (20 12 ) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (20 12 ) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showin g of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 )
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that th e dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Turner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 10.324 May an employer require an employee to undergo a physical examination in connection with a work-related injury?

The employer may have authority independent of the FECA to require the employee to undergo a medical examination to determine whether he or she meets the medical requirements of the position held or can perform the duties of that position. Nothing in the FECA or in this part affects such authority. However, no agency-required examination or related activity shall interfere with the employee's initial choice of physician or the provision of any authorized examination or treatment, including the issuance of Form CA-16.
###### Editorial Note on Part 606

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 606 appear at 71 FR 35513, June 21, 2006.

#### § 606.34 Reports of interest payable. [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           4,104
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  227,695
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,244
<INVENTORY>                                    171,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               400,891
<PP&E>                                          27,764
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,568
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 434,774
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,940
<BONDS>                                        101,508
<COMMON>                                           346
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      92,162
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   434,774
<SALES>                                      1,022,096
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,022,096
<CGS>                                          861,136
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  861,136
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,494
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,460
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,984
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,476
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15





                    [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU]




April 26, 2002



The Directors
Newmont Mining Corporation
1700 Lincoln Street
Denver, Colorado 80203
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Dear Sirs

We have made a review, in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards
applicable to review engagements, of the unaudited interim financial information
of Normandy Mining Limited as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for the six
month periods then ended, as indicated in our report dated February 5, 2002;
because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which was incorporated by
reference in your Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 1, 2002, is being
incorporated by reference in this Registration Statement.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

Yours faithfully
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU


/s/Timothy Biggs
--------------------
  Timothy Biggs
  Partner
Exhibit 23.3

                                    KPMG LLP

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



         We hereby give our consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in this
Registration  Statement  on  Form  F-3  of  Cordiant  Communications  Group  plc
("Cordiant")  of  our  report  dated  September  6,  2000  with  respect  to the
consolidated balance sheet of Morgen-Walke Associates,  Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December  31, 1999 and the related  consolidated  statements  of  operations,
stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then ended,  which report is
included in the Form 6-K of Cordiant dated September 25, 2000.

Yours faithfully

KPMG LLP



New York, USA

September 25, 2000
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4332 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 20, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and 

Entrepreneurship 

AN ACT 

To amend the Small Business Act to clarify the duties of 

procurement center representatives with respect to reviewing solicitations for a contract or task order contract. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 4332 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maximizing Small 

3 Business Competition Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DUTIES OF PROCUREMENT CENTER REPRESENTA5 TIVES WITH RESPECT TO REVIEWING SOLICI6 TATIONS FOR A CONTRACT OR TASK ORDER 

7 CONTRACT. 

8 Section 15(l)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 

9 U.S.C. 644(l)(2)(D)) is amended— 

10 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (E) 

11 through (I) as subparagraphs (F) through (J), re12 spectively; and 

13 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol14 lowing new subparagraph: 

15 ‘‘(E) review any solicitation for a contract 

16 or task order without regard to whether the 

17 contract or task order or part of the contract 

18 or task order is set aside for small business 

19 concerns, whether one or more contract or task 

20 order awards are reserved for small business 

21 concerns under a multiple award contract, or 

22 whether or not the solicitation would result in 

23 a bundled or consolidated contract (as defined 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 4332 RFS 

1 in subsection (s)) or a bundled or consolidated 

2 task order;’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 19, 2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


Linn Energy, LLC:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333‐131153 and 333-151610) on Form S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-146120, 333-148061, 333-148134, 333-162357, and 333-184647) on Form S-3 of Linn Energy, LLC of our reports dated February 21, 2013, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Linn Energy, LLC as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, unitholders' capital, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, which reports appear in the December 31, 2012 annual report on Form 10‐K/A of Linn Energy, LLC.








/s/ KPMG LLP


Houston, Texas


November 5, 2013
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




/s/
      Gysle R. Shellum
              
              April
      27, 2009Gysle
      R. ShellumChief
      Financial Officer
                Petroleum
      Development Corporation
                Managing
      General Partner




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.