alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 90

 96

 100

 96

 97

 97

 105

 95

 100

 87

 86

 91

 95

 95

 100

 97

 98

 98

 98

 97

 98

 98

 98

 98

 98

 97

 100

 99

 99

 99

 78

 90

 90

 91

 92

 93

 91

 88

 77

 80

 81

 86

 91

 91

 92

 92

 94

 93

 94

 93

 94

 93

 94

 94

 94

 93

 94

 95

 95

 95

 86

 93

 93

 93

 94

 94

 94

 92

 87

 83

 84

 89

 92

 93

 94

 95

 95

 94

 95

 94

 95

 95

 95

 95

 95

 95

 96

 96

 96

 97

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 11, 2003

HIGH LOW MEAN

 57.0

 55.5

 56.1

 55.0

 55.7

 56.3

 58.1

 58.1

 58.8

 58.8

 57.6

 56.4

 57.0

 56.8

 56.9

 56.3

 57.6

 56.6

 56.3

 56.4

 55.3

 53.1

 50.8

 50.0

 49.7

 50.3

 50.6

 51.9

 52.4

 52.9

 55.1

 53.7

 54.2

 52.7

 53.1

 54.0

 55.5

 56.2

 57.4

 56.7

 55.8

 54.0

 54.6

 55.0

 55.5

 54.3

 55.4

 54.8

 54.6

 54.0

 53.3

 51.0

 48.5

 47.9

 47.4

 47.7

 48.1

 50.0

 50.8

 52.3

 55.9

 54.8

 55.1

 54.0

 54.5

 55.2

 56.6

 57.2

 58.1

 57.6

 56.7

 55.4

 55.9

 56.1

 56.0

 55.2

 56.4

 55.9

 55.5

 55.2

 54.3

 52.0

 49.8

 49.0

 48.6

 49.1

 49.5

 51.0

 51.7

 52.6

HIGH LOW MEAN

 8.5

 8.7

 8.7

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.5

 8.2

 7.7

 9.2

 9.4

 9.6

 9.5

 9.5

 9.1

 9.2

 9.2

 9.2

 9.0

 9.0

 8.9

 9.2

 9.4

 9.5

 9.5

 9.4

 9.2

 8.9

 8.8

 8.5

 8.2

 8.2

 8.4

 8.4

 8.5

 8.3

 8.0

 7.6

 7.0

 7.0

 9.1

 9.0

 9.1

 9.0

 8.5

 8.6

 8.7

 8.7

 8.7

 8.4

 8.5

 8.6

 8.8

 9.2

 9.2

 9.0

 8.9

 8.6

 8.4

 8.2

 8.3

 8.5

 8.5

 8.7

 8.7

 8.5

 8.2

 8.0

 7.3

 7.5

 9.2

 9.3

 9.3

 9.3

 8.8

 8.8

 8.9

 9.0

 8.8

 8.8

 8.7

 8.9

 9.2

 9.4

 9.4

 9.2

 9.0

 8.8

 8.6

 8.3

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.266 Continuation of SSI status for Medicaid

If we stop your benefits because of your earnings and you are potentially eligible for the special SSI eligibility status you will continue to be considered an SSI recipient for purposes of eligibility for Medicaid during the time it takes us to determine whether the special eligibility status applies to you.

[47 FR 15324, Apr. 9, 1982]
<PAGE>
 
                    COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                Exhibit 11 - Computation of Per Share Earnings

                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                       Three months ended      Six months ended
                                             June 30,              June 30,
                                       -------------------     ---------------- 
                                         1997       1996         1997    1996
                                       --------- ---------     ------- --------
<S>                                    <C>       <C>           <C>      <C> 
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
---------------------------------

Net earnings                              $ 7,980   $12,334   $12,852   $18,096
Preferred dividend                           (225)     (225)     (450)     (450)
                                          -------   -------   -------   -------
                                          $ 7,755   $12,109   $12,402   $17,646
                                          =======   =======   =======   =======

Average common shares outstanding          45,554    44,604    45,441    44,439
Average common share equivalents            1,517     2,893     1,677     2,811
                                          -------   -------   -------   -------
Average number of common shares and
  common share equivalents outstanding     47,071    47,497    47,118    47,250
                                          =======   =======   =======   =======

Primary earnings per common share         $   .16   $   .25   $   .26   $   .37
                                          =======   =======   =======   =======

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
---------------------------------------

Primary net earnings                      $ 7,980   $12,334   $12,852   $18,096
Interest expense, net of income tax 
  expense                                      23        23        46        46
                                          -------   -------   -------   ------- 
                                          $ 8,003   $12,357   $12,898   $18,142

Average common shares outstanding          45,554    44,604    45,441    44,439
Average common share equivalents            1,555     2,892     1,678     3,019
Additional shares issuable                  2,603     2,603     2,603     2,603
                                          -------   -------   -------   -------
Average number of common shares
  assuming full dilution                   49,712    50,099    49,722    50,061
                                          =======   =======   =======   ======= 

Fully diluted earnings per common share   $   .16   $   .25   $   .26   $   .36
                                          =======   =======   =======   =======
</TABLE>
#### § 411.400 Can an EN to which a beneficiary's ticket is assigned refer the beneficiary to a State VR agency for services?

Yes. An EN may refer a beneficiary it is serving under the Ticket to Work program to a State VR agency for services. However, a referral can be made only if the State VR agency and the EN have an agreement that specifies the conditions under which services will be provided by the State VR agency. This agreement must be in writing and signed by the State VR agency and the EN prior to the EN referring any beneficiary to the State VR agency for services.
No. 11,877.

#### Coursey *v.*Industrial Commission of Colorado.

Decided September 19, 1927.

Action in mandamus. Judgment of dismissal.

*Reversed.*

1. Workmen’s *Compensation*— Enforcement *of Award.*A claimant under the workmen’s compensation aet is as much entitled to the enforcement of his award as a judgment creditor is to an execution.

*3122. *Enforcement of Award.*The industrial commission has no discretion to deny enforcement of an award under the workmen’s compensation act.

3. *Mandamus*— Industrial *Commission.*In an action in mandamus against the industrial commission to compel enforcement of an award under the workmen’s compensation act, if there'are facts whieh relieve the commission of its duty to enforce the award, they should be made to appear in the return.

*Error to the District Court of Fremont County, Mon. James L. Cooper, Judge.*

Mr. V. N. Stinson, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. William L. Boatright, Attorney General, Mr. Jean S. Breitenstein, Assistant, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Denison

.delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was mandamus to compel the Industrial Commission to enforce an award in favor of Coursey against the Victor American Fuel Company. A demurrer to the alternative writ was sustained and the cause dismissed. The petitioner brings error.

The alternative writ stated that an award had been made; that the employer, a self-insurer, refuses to comply; yet the commission refused to enforce it. It is conceded that the claimant has no lawful way to enforce his award except by action of the commission. He is as much entitled to the enforcement of his award as a judgment creditor is to an execution. The commission cannot deny him.

It is claimed that the commission has discretion to deny enforcement. The statement is self-contradictory. It is that they may lawfully deny him that which is lawfully his.

Two methods are given to enforce an award: one by application to the district court, C. L. § 4410, another by *313penalty for delay, C. L. § 4491. Perhaps the commission may, in its discretion, choose between them.

It is said that there are other facts which relieve the commission from its duty to enforce the award. If so, they should be made to appear in the return.

The judgment is reversed with directions to overrule the demurrer and proceed with the case.

Mr. Chief Justice Burke, Mr. Justice Whitford and Mr. Justice Sheafor Concur.
EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Current Report
on Form 8-K of First Advantage Corporation of our report dated March 24, 2003,
except for the subsequent events described in Note 16 to the financial
statements as to which the date is April 1, 2003, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of US SEARCH.com Inc., which appears in Registration
Statement No. 333-102565 on Form S-4.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Century City, California
June 6, 2003
#### Frank H. Bachman and Others, Composing the Firm of H. F. Bachman & Company, Respondents, v. Nathaniel G. Pendleton, Appellant.

Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Ro opinion. Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., taking no part.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.982 Blindness under a State plan. We shall also consider you blind for the purposes of payment of supplemental security income benefits if— ( a ) You were found to be blind as defined under a State plan approved under title X or title XVI of the Social Security Act, as in effect for October 1972;
( b ) You received aid under the State plan because of your blindness for the month of December 1973; and
( c ) You continue to be blind as defined under the State plan.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,063.47

 1,063.70

 1,063.99

 1,064.14

 1,064.34

 1,064.55

 1,064.67

 1,064.54

 1,064.39

 1,064.29

 1,064.15

 1,063.99

 1,063.81

 1,063.71

 1,063.58

 1,063.41

 1,063.08

 1,062.84

 1,062.51

 1,062.19

 1,061.94

 1,061.62

 1,061.35

 1,060.90

 1,060.49

 1,060.10

 1,059.70

 1,059.33

 1,059.02

 1,058.71

 1,058.36

 4,447.7

 4,454.5

 4,463.0

 4,467.4

 4,473.3

 4,479.5

 4,483.0

 4,479.2

 4,474.8

 4,471.8

 4,467.7

 4,463.0

 4,457.7

 4,454.8

 4,450.9

 4,446.0

 4,436.3

 4,429.3

 4,419.6

 4,410.3

 4,403.0

 4,393.7

 4,385.8

 4,372.8

 4,360.9

 4,349.6

 4,338.0

 4,327.3

 4,318.3

 4,309.4

 4,299.3

STORAGE

+7.6

+6.7

+8.5

+4.4

+5.9

+6.2

+3.5

-3.8

-4.4

-2.9

-4.1

-4.7

-5.3

-2.9

-3.8

-5.0

-9.7

-7.0

-9.6

-9.3

-7.3

-9.3

-7.8

-13.1

-11.9

-11.3

-11.6

-10.7

-9.0

-8.9

-10.1

CHANGE

 8,744

 8,477

 9,081

 7,637

 9,165

 9,313

 9,281

 6,002

 6,146

 7,226

 7,339

 7,052

 6,245

 7,691

 7,141

 6,499

 5,249

 6,559

 5,225

 5,409

 6,021

 5,017

 5,930

 3,774

 4,136

 3,707

 3,475

 3,705

 4,618

 4,508

 4,163

INFLOW

 4,657

 4,772

 4,714

 5,392

 5,933

 6,036

 7,203

 7,646

 8,071

 8,374

 9,107

 9,169

 8,647

 8,867

 8,865

 8,797

 9,828

 9,969

 9,748

 9,863

 9,380

 9,441

 9,613

 10,235

 9,777

 9,269

 9,186

 8,929

 8,873

 8,785

 8,995

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 242

 303

 78

 17

 260

 156

 295

 287

 304

 338

 312

 260

 260

 303

 199

 216

 302

 129

 336

 258

 318

 266

 274

 128

 341

 128

 128

 178

 271

 229

 254

C.F.S.

 .28

 .35

 .09

 .02

 .30

 .18

 .34

 .33

 .35

 .39

 .36

 .30

 .30

 .35

 .23

 .25

 .35

 .15

 .39

 .30

 .37

 .31

 .32

 .15

 .40

 .15

 .15

 .21

 .32

 .27

 .30

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2012 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: June 15, 2012

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -140.7 194,535 258,141 0 0 7,370 8.56 .00

ACRE-FEET -140,700 385,860 512,023 0 0 14,618

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 512,023

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 512,023

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2011 43.43

 4,440.1

Table 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY

 2,965

 2,240

 2,754

 2,340

 2,799

 2,636

 2,380

 2,480

 2,159

 2,412

 2,589

 2,646

 3,010

 3,591

 3,446

 2,247

 2,651

 2,179

 2,724

 2,878

 3,075

 2,960

 2,819

 2,090

 2,936

 2,722

 3,016

 3,120

 3,953

 4,999

 4,051

 61,276

 61,029

 60,105

 59,716

 58,953

 58,665

 58,236

 57,585

 57,062

 56,260

 55,738

 55,411

 55,154

 55,256

 55,904

 56,383

 55,698

 55,432

 54,730

 54,582

 54,587

 54,779

 54,852

 54,787

 54,033

 54,121

 54,001

 54,166

 54,422

 55,456

 57,432

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2008 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: September 1, 2008

 64,241

 63,269

 62,859

 62,056

 61,752

 61,301

 60,616

 60,065

 59,221

 58,672

 58,327

 58,057

 58,164

 58,847

 59,350

 58,630

 58,349

 57,611

 57,454

 57,460

 57,662

 57,739

 57,671

 56,877

 56,969

 56,843

 57,017

 57,286

 58,375

 60,455

 61,483

 5,831,000

 5,809,000

 5,788,000

 5,767,000

 5,745,000

 5,724,000

 5,703,000

 5,682,000

 5,660,000

 5,639,000

 5,618,000

 5,596,000

 5,575,000

 5,554,000

 5,532,000

 5,511,000

 5,490,000

 5,468,000

 5,447,000

 5,426,000

 5,404,000

 5,383,000

 5,362,000

 5,341,000

 5,319,000

 5,298,000

 5,277,000

 5,255,000

 5,234,000

 5,213,000

 5,191,000

 SHASTA

 INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 COLS 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY 

 AFTER 

 ADJUSTED 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 64,501
Electrical Conductivity, UMHOS

Day High Low Mean

1 159 146 155

2 158 135 148

3 150 136 143

4 148 135 141

5 149 138 145

6 153 140 147

7 152 140 148

8 150 141 146

9 152 138 145

10 150 137 145

11 152 139 146

12 153 133 146

13 146 133 141

14 152 130 143

15 146 133 142

16 143 123 136

17 140 126 136

18 140 125 135

19 135 126 130

20 132 121 128

21 129 121 126

22 127 118 124

23 127 118 124

24 128 119 125

25 127 112 122

26 126 107 119

27 126 111 119

28 122 114 118

29 123 116 118

30 124 115 121

COMMENT(S):

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

Historical Archive and Report Database

San Andreas On The San Joaquin River 

Period: April 2023 Run Date: 5/9/2023
(No. 4152

#### Robert B. Radford, Claimant, vs. State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed December*15, *1950.*

Robert H. Allison and Herbert N. Tragethon, Attorneys for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

SCHUMAN, C. J.

Claimant, Robert B. Radford, 62 years of age, was employed on June 17, 1948 by the Department of Public Welfare, State of Illinois, at Peoria State Hospital, and was working the shift from 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. in Ward Z-3, called the receiving ward. Claimant was married, but there is no proof of any children under 16 years of age.

No jurisdictional questions are raised, and injuries *176of claimant were sustained in the course of his employment.

Claimant’s earnings for the year preceding his injury were $1,997.00.

At about 7:45 P,M. on June 17, 1948 an altercation ensued between claimant and a patient by the name of Lester Moomaw. Claimant received very painful injuries, consisting of fractured ribs, and a later diagnosis confirmed a diaphragmatic hernia for which he underwent surgery. After the operation claimant suffered weakness and numbness of both feet and lower extremities, and complained of pain in left shoulder. Claimant has a persistent foot drop of his left foot, and it is necessary for him to wear a brace to correct this. Dr. Lloyd Finley Teter’s report admitted, without objection, that claimant had 25 to 50% total and permanent loss of the use of his left leg. It is apparent that the condition of claimant’s leg resulted from his injuries, and the treatment therefor.

All hospital and medical expenses have been paid by respondent. Claimant expended the sum of $195.60 for expenses to and from various doctors and hospitals authorized by respondent, for this claimant should be reimbursed.

On the basis of this record the Court concludes claimant has sustained a 35% permanent specific loss of use of the left leg. Claimant was temporarily permanently disabled for 47 6/7 weeks for which he is entitled to compensation at the rate of $19.50 per week, or $933.21. During his temporary disability claimant was paid by the department the sum of $878.67. This deducted from $933.21 leaves a balance due of $54.54.

Stenographic services at the hearing were furnished and reported by Johnson Fleming, for which he has sub*177mitted a statement in the amount of $65.70, which the Court finds to be reasonable.

On the basis of the record the Court makes the following award:

For temporary total disability to claimant balance due $54.54, which.has accrued and is payable forthwith.

For 35% specific loss of use of left leg of claimant, 66% weeks at $19.50 per week for a total of $1,296.75, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith.

The sum of $195.60 to claimant for money necessarily expended by him to receive treatment for his said injuries.

The sum of $65.70 for stenographic services, payable to Johnson Fleming.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor, as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the. payment of compensation awards to State employees.”
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129097 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129097 COA: 259199 Monroe CC: 96-027383-FC LUIS ANGEL PESQUERA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
#### § 431.122 Use of Federal funds.

Federal funds administered by a Federal department or agency may not be expended for research involving human subjects unless the requirements of this policy have been satisfied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               MARWICH II, LTD.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Schumacher, President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
D E P AR T M E N T O F T H E AI R F O R C E

HEADQUARTERS AIR FOR CE FLIGHT STANDARDS AGENCY (AFFSA)

14 June 2016

MEMORANDUM FOR HQ FAA/A RM

- 10 0

FROM: HQ AFFSA/ XOF

6500 South MacArthur Blvd

Building 4, Room 117

Oklahoma City, OK 73169

SUBJECT: 14 CFR Exemption 4633 (Regulatory Docket FAA

- 2002

- 12189)

1. Title 14 CFR Exemption 4633 was granted to the United States Air Force o n 6 Jun 86 and

was renewed as 4633 O on 18 Apr 2014 . The exemption expires 30 Sep 2016 . Exemption

4633 O relieves USAF aircraft from the provisions of Section 91.215 (b) and (c).

2. Under this exemption, the USAF conducts military training flight operations in designated

airspace above 10,000 feet MSL without operating aircraft transponders, subject to provisions

established by the FAA. The provisions of 4633 , as amended in 4633 O

, will remain a part of

this renewal, if approved. The requirement for the USAF to conduct these operations remains

unchanged. Extension of the exemption is essential for USAF aircrews to accomplis h

transponder

- off operations and training. These procedures are critical to continuation training

for wartime scenarios and training operations. The procedures, affected areas, and operations

constraints outlined in Exemption 4633 (as amended in 2006) h a ve provided invaluable training

to USAF aircrews

. We hereby request a n extension IAW Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations,

Part 11.

2. As operations under this exemption have been safely conducted for the past t hirty years, the

Air Force requests your consideration in approving the renewal of this exemption through 30 Sep

2019 . Please contact me with any questions at ( 405 ) 73 4

- 6950 or e

- mail: hqaffsa.xof@us.af.mil

.

MATTHEW J. NIENDORF, Major, USAF

Chief, Flight Standards Division