alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Neil I. Salmon, certify that:

1. the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: March 8, 2010



/S/ NEIL I. SALMONNeil I. SalmonVice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



Page 94 of 94
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE * IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

COMMISSION OF MARYLAND

* OF MARYLAND

v. * Misc. Docket AG No. 39,

FREDERICK ARTHUR LOVEJOY * September Term, 2019 

O R D E R

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Amended Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial 

Action filed by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland filed pursuant to 

Maryland Rule 19-737 and 19-721, the Show Cause Order, Petitioner’s Response to Show 

Cause Order, Respondent’s Response to Show Cause Order, and the record herein, it is this 

23rd day of January, 2020,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Frederick 

Arthur Lovejoy, be and he hereby is, REPRIMANDED for violating Rules 3.4 (c) and 4.4 

(a) of the Maryland Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct. 

 

 /s/ Mary Ellen Barbera

 Chief Judge
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.503 Minimum monthly benefit amount.

If you receive an SSI benefit that does not include a State supplement the minimum monthly SSI benefit amount payable is $1. When an SSI benefit amount of less than $1 is payable, the benefit amount will be increased to $1. If you receive an SSI benefit that does include a State supplement and the SSI benefit amount is less than $1 but when added to the State supplement exceeds $1, the SSI benefit amount will not be increased to $1. Rather, we pay the actual amount of the SSI benefit plus the State supplement.

[50 FR 48572, Nov. 26, 1985]
#### § 618.400 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the conditions under which an AAW may apply for and receive a job search allowance to help the worker secure suitable employment outside the commuting area but within the United States. This subpart also sets forth the conditions under which an AAW may apply for and receive a relocation allowance to help the worker relocate to suitable employment secured outside the commuting area but within the United States.
IMMUCOR, INC.
 
 EXHIBITS


 Exhibit 11.1  Statement re: computation of per share earnings.



 Primary income per share calculations:
                       Three Month                   Six Months Ended
                 November 30    November 30     November 30    November 30,
                    1997           1996            1997           1996


 Net income       $546,407       $482,720        $1,104,062     $1,079,888


 Weighted average number of common
 shares and common share
 equivalents are as follows:
 Weighted average common shares
  outstanding 
                  8,098,797       8,055,077      8,089,561       8,055,056

 Shares issued from assumed exercise of
  dilutive options and warrant
                    469,934         564,879        395,168         568,101

 Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (as adjusted) 
                  8,568,731       8,619,956      8,484,729       8,623,157


 Net income per common
  and common equivalent share 
                      $0.06           $0.06          $0.13           $0.13



 Note:  shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the
 numberof incremental shares which result from applying the "treasury stock
 method" for options and warrants.





                                    IMMUCOR, INC.

 EXHIBITS


 Exhibit 11.1  Statement re: computation of per share earnings.
 (continued)


 Fully diluted income per share calculations:
                         Three Month                    Six Months Ended
                  November 30    November 30       November 30    November 30,
                    1997           1996              1997           1996


 Net income       $546,407       $482,720         1,104,062      1,079,088


 Weighted average number of common
 shares and common share
 equivalents are as follows:
 Weighted average common shares
  outstanding                
                 8,098,797      8,055,077         8,089,651      8,055,056

Shares issued from assumed exercise of
  dilutive options and warrant
                   469,934        564,879           395,168        584,396

Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding (as adjusted)
                 8,568,731      8,619,956         8,484,819      8,639,452

Net income per common
  and common equivalent share  
                     $0.06          $0.06             $0.13          $0.13




 Note:  shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the
 number of incremental shares which result from applying the "treasury stock
 method" for options and warrants.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, *v.*Earlie Mae Perkins, Defendant-Appellant.

(No. 11742;

Fourth District —

August 9, 1973.

Linda West Conley, Assistant Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Basil G. Greanias, State’s Attorney, of Decatur, (Scott B. Diamond, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel,) for the People.

Opinion by

Mr. JUSTICE TRAPP.
```

[113th Congress Public Law 215]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 128 STAT. 2088]]

Public Law 113-215
113th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
    Veterans Affairs to be constructed at 3141 Centennial Boulevard, 
 Colorado Springs, Colorado, as the ``PFC Floyd K. Lindstrom Department 
  of Veterans Affairs Clinic''. <<NOTE: Dec. 16, 2014 -  [H.R. 3375]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PFC FLOYD K. LINDSTROM DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
                              CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs to be constructed at 3141 Centennial 
Boulevard, Colorado Springs, Colorado, shall be known and designated as 
the ``PFC Floyd K. Lindstrom Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the building referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``PFC Floyd 
K. Lindstrom Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic''.

    Approved December 16, 2014.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3375:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 160 (2014):
            June 17, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 3, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lawrence William CLEARY, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 80-1557.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 26, 1982.

Marc B. Geller, San Diego, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

George D. Hardy, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., argued for plaintiff-appellee; M. James Lorenz, U. S. Atty., George D. Hardy, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., on brief.

Before WRIGHT and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.

*

 Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

Following our opinion of May 18,1981, as corrected on September 8, 1981 (656 F.2d 1302), the government petitioned for a writ of certiorari. The writ was granted by the Supreme Court of the United States.

On June 14, 1982, that Court vacated the judgment of this court and remanded for further consideration in light of *United States v. Ross,*456 U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982).

*314Having considered that opinion, we conclude that *Ross*controls. This court’s opinion is vacated, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, and the mandate of this court shall issue now.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 9:15 AM 

To: Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: 

Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary 

Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 

Hi, 

Attached are the handouts from this meeting. 

Regards, 

Cortney 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_01_GHGExisitng_WM_Handout1.pdf >> 

<< 2060AR33_2014_05_01_GHGExisitng_WM_Handout2.pdf >> 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission 

Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility 

Generating Units 

When: Thursday, May 01, 2014 3:00 PM-3:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: Wilson Room, White House Conference Center, 726 Jackson Place, NW 

This meeting was requested by Greg Carnrick, former Congressman Dick Gephardt’s office on 

behalf of Waste Management.
### §144. Unlawful receiving of imported milk or cream

It shall be unlawful for any person in the United States to receive milk or cream imported into the United States unless the importation is in accordance with the provisions of this subchapter.

(Feb. 15, 1927, ch. 155, §4, 44 Stat. 1103.)
Exhibit 32

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersignedcertify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Steven R. Williams                                                                                                   | Ma | September 7, 2006 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|-------------------|
| Steven R. Williams, 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                                                               |    |
| Petroleum Development Corporation, 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant                                          |    |
|                                                                                                                          |    |
|                                                                                                                          |    |
| /s/ Darwin L. Stump                                                                                                      |    | September 7, 2006 |
| Darwin L. Stump                                                                                                          |    |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer 

Petroleum Development Corporation, 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant |    |

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 3,714

 3,853

 4,351

 4,209

 5,434

 6,582

 7,141

 8,982

 9,912

 11,207

 10,593

 10,245

 8,689

 8,324

 8,078

 7,916

 8,767

 9,452

 8,804

 8,896

 7,152

 8,353

 7,817

 8,310

 8,605

 9,396

 8,330

 8,296

 7,888

 7,727

 6,962

 726

 752

 858

 922

 1,064

 1,144

 1,166

 1,466

 1,769

 2,082

 2,068

 2,010

 1,619

 1,356

 1,594

 2,124

 2,943

 3,114

 2,134

 1,700

 1,441

 1,369

 1,182

 1,142

 1,095

 1,064

 1,306

 1,481

 1,669

 1,282

 1,459

 2,130

 2,214

 2,117

 2,184

 2,617

 2,807

 3,066

 4,187

 5,293

 5,961

 5,850

 5,711

 5,168

 4,828

 4,744

 4,872

 5,345

 5,504

 4,704

 4,070

 3,813

 3,923

 3,668

 3,731

 3,854

 4,093

 4,198

 4,555

 4,955

 4,408

 4,089

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 2, 2020

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PITTSBURG TOP ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
<page>
EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley
Cornerstone Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		May 15, 2007
### §3617. Travel expenses

While away from their homes, regular places of business, or official stations in performance of services under this part, members of the Board of the Commission and the representatives of the United States on the Consultative Committee referred to in section 3615 of this title and on the Joint Commission on the Environment referred to in section 3616 of this title shall be allowed travel or transportation expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, in the same manner as persons employed intermittently in Government service are allowed expenses under section 5703 of title 5.

(Pub. L. 96–70, title I, §1107, Sept. 27, 1979, 93 Stat. 458.)
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bruce Winfield, Chief Executive Officer of Portal Resources Ltd. (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: January 15, 2008





/s/ Bruce Winfield

Bruce Winfield,

President and Chief Executive Officer













#
# A-1. All Individuals

# A-2. Low-income

# A-3. Children 

# A-4. Working age 

# A-5. Elderly

# A-6. HH no vehicle
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
§ 418.1255 What kind of major life-changing event evidence will you need to support your request for us to use a more recent tax year? ( a ) If your spouse died and we do not have evidence of the death in our records, we will require proof of death as described in § 404.720(b) or (c) or § 404.721 of this chapter.
( b ) If you marry and we do not have evidence of the marriage in our records, we will require proof of marriage as described in §§ 404.725 through 404.727 of this chapter.
( c ) If your marriage ends and we do not have evidence that the marriage has ended in our records, we will require proof that the marriage has ended as described in § 404.728(b) or (c) of this chapter.
( d ) If you or your spouse stop working or reduce your work hours, we will require evidence documenting the change in work activity. Examples of acceptable documentation include, but are not limited to, documents we can corroborate such as a signed statement from your employer, proof of the transfer of your business, or your signed statement under penalty of perjury, describing your work separation or a reduction in hours.
( e ) If you or your spouse experiences a loss of income-producing property, we will require evidence documenting the loss. Examples of acceptable evidence include, but are not limited to, insurance claims or an insurance adjuster's statement. If the claim of loss is due to criminal fraud or theft by a third party, we will also require proof of conviction for the fraud or theft, such as a court document.
( f ) If you or your spouse experiences a scheduled cessation, termination, or reorganization of an employer's pension plan, we will require evidence documenting the change in or loss of the pension. An example of acceptable evidence includes, but is not limited to, a statement from your pension fund administrator explaining the reduction or termination of your benefits.
( g ) If you or your spouse receives a settlement from an employer or former employer because of the employer's closure, bankruptcy, or reorganization, we will require evidence documenting the settlement and the reason(s) for the settlement. An example of acceptable evidence includes, but is not limited to, a letter from the former employer stating the settlement terms and how they affect you or your spouse.
[71 FR 62931, Oct. 27, 2006, as amended at 75 FR 41086, July 15, 2010]
#### Michael W. Flynn, Respondent, v. New York, Westchester and Boston Railway Company, Appellant, and Another, Defendant.

Motion granted on condition that within twenty days appellant give a bond in the sum of $5,000 for the payment of the costs already taxed, and the usual costs on appeal, as weE as the sum alternatively directed to be paid for the purposes of the conveyance. If appellant shaE neglect to give such bond, the motion is denied, with ten doEars costs. Present—Jenks, P. J., Burr, Thomas, Carr and Rich, JJ.
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>

                                    COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                                  (In thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months Ended   Nine Months Ended 
                                                     September 30,       September 30,  
Basic Per Share Earnings (Loss)                     1998      1997      1998      1997 


<S>                                               <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Average shares outstanding during period           21,559    20,850    21,457    20,247
                                                  =======   =======   =======   =======




Net loss                                          $  (561)  $  (124)  $(2,218)  $(1,522)

Undeclared cumulative dividends on Series B
  and Series C Senior Preferred Stock                 (50)     ( 50)     (150)     (150)
                                                  -------   -------   -------   -------
Net loss applicable to common shares              $  (611)  $  (174)  $(2,368)  $(1,672)
                                                  =======   =======   =======   =======
Basic loss per common share                       $  (.03)  $  (.01)  $  (.11)  $  (.08)
                                                  =======   =======   =======   =======

</TABLE>

















                                             -18-
<PAGE>
                                          EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
                          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (Cont'd)
                            (In thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>
                                                  Three Months Ended  Nine Months Ended 
                                                     September 30,       September 30,  
Diluted Per Share Earnings (Loss)                   1998      1997      1998      1997 


<S>                                               <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Average shares outstanding during period           21,559    20,850    21,457    20,247

Employee stock options assumed exercised                -         -       206         -

Dilutive effect of convertible securities
  computed by the "if converted" method:

  Series A preferred stock                             95        95        95        95
  Series B & C preferred stock                      1,986     1,986     1,986     1,986
                                                  -------   -------   -------   -------
                                                   23,640    22,931    23,744    22,328
                                                  =======   =======   =======   =======




Net loss applicable to common shares              $  (561)  $  (124)  $(2,218)  $(1,522)
                                                  =======   =======   =======   =======




Diluted loss per common share                     $  (.02)  $  (.01)  $  (.09)  $  (.07)
                                                  =======   =======   =======   =======



</TABLE>


                                             -19-