alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.620 Civil money penalties and other remedies. ( a ) The Administrator may assess a civil money penalty not to exceed $11,524 for each alien crewmember with respect to whom there has been a violation of the attestation or subpart F or G of this part. The Administrator may also impose appropriate remedy(ies).
( b ) In determining the amount of civil money penalty to be assessed, the Administrator shall consider the type of violation committed and other relevant factors. The factors which may be considered include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) Previous history of violation, or violations, by the employer under the Act and subpart F or G of this part;
( 2 ) The number of workers affected by the violation or violations;
( 3 ) The gravity of the violation or violations;
( 4 ) Efforts made by the violator in good faith to comply with the provisions of 8 U.S.C. 1288(c) and subparts F and G of this part;
( 5 ) The violator's explanation of the violation or violations;
( 6 ) The violator's commitment to future compliance; and/or
( 7 ) The extent to which the violator achieved a financial gain due to the violation, or the potential financial loss, potential injury or adverse effect with respect to other parties.
( c ) The civil money penalty, and any other remedy determined by the Administrator to be appropriate, are immediately due for payment or performance upon the assessment by the Administrator, or the decision by an administrative law judge where a hearing is requested, or the decision by the Secretary where review is granted. The employer shall remit the amount of the civil money penalty, by certified check or money order made payable to the order of “Wage and Hour Division, Labor.” The remittance shall be delivered or mailed to the Wage and Hour Division office for the area in which the violations occurred. The performance of any other remedy prescribed by the Administrator shall follow procedures established by the Administrator. The employer's failure to pay the civil money penalty, or to perform any other remedy prescribed by the Administrator, shall result in the rejection by ETA of any future attestation submitted by the employer, until such payment or performance is accomplished.
[60 FR 3969, 3977, Jan. 19, 1995, as amended at 81 FR 43448, July 1, 2016; 82 FR 5380, Jan. 18, 2017; 83 FR 11, Jan. 2, 2018; 84 FR 217, Jan. 23, 2019; 85 FR 2296, Jan. 15, 2020; 86 FR 2967, Jan. 14, 2021; 87 FR 2333, Jan. 14, 2022; 88 FR 2214, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 1814, Jan. 11, 2024]
§ 667.740 What procedure must be used for administering the offset/deduction provisions at section 184(c) of the Act? ( a ) ( 1 ) For recipient level misexpenditures, we may determine that a debt, or a portion thereof, may be offset against amounts that are allotted to the recipient. Recipients must submit a written request for an offset to the Grant Officer. Generally, we will apply the offset against amounts that are available at the recipient level for administrative costs.
( 2 ) The Grant Officer may approve an offset request, under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, if the misexpenditures were not due to willful disregard of the requirements of the Act and regulations, gross negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of administration or a pattern of misexpenditure.
( b ) For subrecipient level misexpenditures that were not due to willful disregard of the requirements of the Act and regulations, gross negligence, failure to observe accepted standards of administration or a pattern of misexpenditure, if we have required the State to repay such amount the State may deduct an amount equal to the misexpenditure from its subsequent year's allocations to the local area from funds available for the administrative costs of the local programs involved.
( c ) If offset is granted, the debt will not be fully satisfied until the Grant Officer reduces amounts allotted to the State by the amount of the misexpenditure.
( d ) A State may not make a deduction under paragraph (b) of this section until the State has taken appropriate corrective action to ensure full compliance within the local area with regard to appropriate expenditure of WIA funds.
### Appeal No. 2019AP9

- CR Cir. Ct. No. 2015CF3359



### STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT I

S TATE OF 

### W ISCONSIN



### ,

P LAINTIFF



### - R ESPONDENT



### ,

V



### .

M ARK 

### A NTHONY 

### C ULPEPPER



### ,

D EFENDANT



### - A PPELLANT



### . 

### FILED

September 13,

2021

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals



### ERRATA SHEET

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

P.O. Box 1688

Madison, WI 53701

- 1688

Court of Appeals District III

2100 Stewart Ave., Suite 310

Wausau, WI 54401

Christina Plum

, Sarah Motiff

Court of Appeals

2921 Landmark Place , Suite 415

Madison, WI 537 1 3

- 4248

Court of Appeals District II

2727 N. Grandview Blvd.

Waukesha, WI 53188

- 1672

Court of Appeals District IV

2921 Landmark Place, Suite 415

Madison, WI 537 1 3

- 4248

John D. Flynn

Electronic Notice Hon. Jeffrey A. Conen

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

Hon. Joseph R. Wall

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

Hon. Jonathan D. Watts

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

John Barrett

Clerk of Circuit Court

Milwaukee County

Electronic Notice

Joy Malby Bertrand

Electronic Notice

Sarah Burgundy

Assistant Attorney General

Electronic NoticeNo. 2019AP9

- CR

2 

### P LEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to paragraph 1

and 2 in the above

- captioned opinion which was released on June 2, 2021 . A

corrected electronic version in its ent irety is available on the court’ s website at

www.wicourts.gov.No. 2019AP9

- CR

3
AIR RESOURCES BOARD

VENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 1

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Ventura County APCD Rule No.: 74. 19 Date / Amended: J une 1 4 , 20 1 1

Rule Title: Graphic Arts

Date Submitted to ARB: June 30

, 20 1 1 If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended: November 1 1

, 200 3

Is the Rule Intended to be Se nt to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? (X) Yes ( ) No If NO, do not complete remainder of form.

District Contact: Stan Cowen Phone No.: 805 /645

- 1408

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: ( ) New Rule (X) Amended Rule 74. 2

Amended Rule 74. 19 incorporates new ROC limits for solvent cleaners and fountain solutions

. New solvent cleaning limits range from 25 to

100 grams per liter of material, and new fountain solution limits range from 16 to 100 grams per liter of material, as applie d.

Pollut ant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 PM10 CO TAC

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emission. Attach referen ce(s) for emission factor(s) and other

information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emissions information provided below was determined. See staff report Appendix A for emission calculations.

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase (X) Decrease ( ) N/A

Emission Reduction Commitmen t in SIP (Control Measure R

- 3 16 ) for this source category: To Be Determined

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: 200 2 Area Affected: County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate:

Year Tons/year

Reductions 200 2 Baseline

Tons/year

Su bject to Rule Control

Level Percent

Control Control

Level Control Factor

20 1 2 40 / 100

= 0. 4 * 100 = 40 % 1.00

- 0. 4

= 0. 6

The 200 2 baseline emissions were based on the 2007 Ventura County APCD Air Quality Management Plan

.AIR RESOURCES BOARD

VENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 2

III. SOURCES/ATTAI NMENT STATUS

District is: ( ) Attainment (X) Nonattainment ( ) Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: 32

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 100 %

Number of Large (>100 TPY) Sources Controlled: None Percent in Nona ttainment Area: Not Applicable

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes, the solvent cleaner and fountain solution limits are in the form of grams of

ROC per liter of material, as applied

.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): Section B Work Practice Standards: Section B

Recordkeeping Requirements: Section D Test Methods : Section E

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment

Discussion: Amendments to Rule 74. 19 will reduce emissions of reactive organic compounds for Ventura County’s efforts toward

achieving attainment of the ozone standard. Therefore, RFP will be furthered by amendments to Rule 74

. 19.
Order entered October 7, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00552
- CV
DIANE B. SANTIAGO , ET AL. , Appellant s V. CENTRAL MORTGAGE COM PANY, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 199
- 04179
- 2011 

### O RDER On July 2, 2014, the Court ordered that this appeal be submitted without the reporter’s record. Thereafter, appellants’ August 4, 2014 motion for an extension of time to file a brief was granted without a ddressing their request to allow briefing on the reporter’s record which was filed the same day as the motion. Accordingly, we VACATE this Court’s July 2, 2014 order. Appellants’ brief includes citations to the reporter’s record. Appellee filed a brief without citing to the reporter’s record in light of this Court’s July 2, 2014 order. Because this appeal will now be submitted with the reporter’s record, appellee may file an amended brief within thirty days of the date of this order.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.2218 [Reserved]
1 John T. B oyd, Ch ief Justice ( Ret.), Seventh Court o f Appeals , sitting by as sign ment. NO. 07-03-0371 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L E AUGUST 15 , 2003

______________________________ ALBERTO RENE PACHECO AKA A LBERTO ANTONIO SAUCEDO AKA ALBER

TO PACHECO AKA ALBERTO PACHECO S OLIS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 18 1ST DISTR ICT COURT OF POTT ER COUNTY; NO. 42,881-B; H ONORAB LE JOHN B OARD, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, S.J. 1 MEM ORAN DUM OP INI ON Following a ple a of

not guilt y, a ppe ll ant wasconvicted by a j ury of delivery of a controlled substance, enhanced, and punishm ent was assessed at 90 years confinem ent.2 The conviction appealed from was previously affirm ed b y this C ourt in an

unpubli shed opini on on December 17, 2002, in Cau se Number 07-02-0076-CR. 2 Proceeding pro se , appellant filed a notice of appeal in which he indicated he is indigent an d r eq ue st ed ap po in tmen t o f co un se l. Bas ed up on th e r at io na le exp re sse d h er ei n, we dismiss for w

ant of j urisdiction. Appe llan t’s sentence w as impose d on Decem ber 11, 2001. His notice of a ppea l bearsa file stam p date f romthe trial co urt clerk of May 14, 2003. A

def end ant m ust file a written notice of appeal with the trial court clerk within 30 days after the date sen tence is imposed. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c) & 26.2(a)(1). The Tex as Rules of Ap pellate Pro cedure provide for

a 15 -da y ex

ten sion in w hich to f

ile the notice of appeal if it is accom panied by a m otion for extens ion o f time. Tex. R. Ap p. P. 26.3. This Court is w ithout jurisdiction to address the m erits of

an appeal and can take no ac tion other than to dism iss the appeal if it is not timely perfected. SeeSlaton v . Sta te, 981 S.W.2d 208, 21 0 (Tex .Cr.A pp. 1998 ). Appella nt’s notice filed approximately 17 mont hs after s entence was im pos ed isunt im ely and does not invoke our j urisdiction. 2 Accordingly, the purported appeal is dism issed for want of jurisdiction. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish.
§ 663.515 What is the process for initial determination of provider eligibility? ( a ) To be eligible to receive adult or dislocated worker training funds under title I of WIA, all providers must submit applications to the Local Boards in the areas in which they wish to provide services. The application must describe each program of training services to be offered.
( b ) For programs eligible under title IV of the Higher Education Act and apprenticeship programs registered under the National Apprenticeship Act (NAA), and the providers or such programs, Local Boards determine the procedures to use in making an application. The procedures established by the Local Board must specify the timing, manner, and contents of the required application.
( c ) For programs not eligible under title IV of the HEA or registered under the NAA, and for providers not eligible under title IV of the HEA or carrying out apprenticeship programs under NAA: ( 1 ) The Governor must develop a procedure for use by Local Boards for determining the eligibility of other providers, after ( i ) Soliciting and taking into consideration recommendations from Local Boards and providers of training services within the State;
( ii ) Providing an opportunity for interested members of the public, including representatives of business and labor organizations, to submit comments on the procedure; and
( iii ) Designating a specific time period for soliciting and considering the recommendations of Local Boards and provider, and for providing an opportunity for public comment.
( 2 ) The procedure must be described in the State Plan.
( 3 ) ( i ) The procedure must require that the provider must submit an application to the Local Board at such time and in such manner as may be required, which contains a description of the program of training services;
( ii ) If the provider provides a program of training services on the date of application, the procedure must require that the application include an appropriate portion of the performance information and program cost information described in § 663.540, and that the program meet appropriate levels of performance;
( iii ) If the provider does not provide a program of training services on that date, the procedure must require that the provider meet appropriate requirements specified in the procedure. (WIA sec. 122(b)(2)(D).)
( d ) The Local Board must include providers that meet the requirements of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section on a local list and submit the list to the designated State agency. The State agency has 30 days to determine that the provider or its programs do not meet the requirements relating to the providers under paragraph (c) of this section. After the agency determines that the provider and its programs meet(s) the criteria for initial eligibility, or 30 days have elapsed, whichever occurs first, the provider and its programs are initially eligible. The programs and providers submitted under paragraph (b) of this section are initially eligible without State agency review. (WIA sec. 122(e).)
#### S. F. Sayrs, Defendant in Error, v. E. F. Thompson, Plaintiff in Error.

Gen. No. 17,221.

Landlord and *tenant*— reimbursement *of tenant for repairs.*Where a tenant liad no agreement either with his landlord or the latter’s grantor for reimbursement for sums spent in repairs he is not entitled to be repaid sums so spent during the term of the lease.

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Gillen, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1911.

Affirmed.

Opinion filed October 1, 1912.

Rehearing denied and opinion modified and refiled October 15, 1912.

Thompson *&*Clark, for plaintiff in error.

M. B. *Waltz,*for defendant in error.

*208Mr. Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was a suit in forcible detainer united with a claim for rent under Section 48 of the Municipal Court Act. A judgment was given for possession and $175 accrued rent.

Plaintiff in error claimed a set-off for the value of improvements made by him several years prior to the purchase of the premises by defendant in error, but. had paid the latter rent for nearly four years before the suit was brought.

It is well settled as a general rule that a landlord is under no obligation to pay the tenant for improvements made during the term of a lease in the absence of an agreement to that effect, and none was shown in this case, either with defendant in error or his grantor. Bedford v. Bedford, 136 Ill. 354; Diederich v. Rose, 228 Ill. 610.

The judgment will be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.460 Extensions. ( a ) *Basis for extension.* Under certain circumstances an employer may apply for extensions of the period of employment. A request for extension must be related to weather conditions or other factors beyond the control of the employer (which may include unforeseen changes in market conditions). Such requests must be supported in writing, with documentation showing that the extension is needed and that the need could not have been reasonably foreseen by the employer. The CO will not grant an extension where the total period of employment under that *CW-1 Application for Temporary Employment Certification* and the authorized extension would exceed the maximum applicable duration permitted under § 655.420(g).
( b ) *Decision by the CO.* The CO will notify the employer of the decision in writing. The employer may appeal a denial of a request for an extension by following the appeal procedures in § 655.461.
( c ) *Obligations during period of extension.* The CW-1 employer's assurances and obligations under the TLC will continue to apply during the extended period of employment. The employer must immediately provide to its CW-1 workers and workers in corresponding employment a copy of any approved extension.
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Carla Faucett, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Acorn Holding Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); andc. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.         February 15, 2006 By /s/ Carla Faucett               Carla Faucett        Principal Financial and        Accounting Officer  
23
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1082 Who conducts the hearings.

If a hearing is required, it will be conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services' Departmental Appeals Board (the Board).

[46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981, as amended at 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 8 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2010 Revision, published July 1, 2010, at 75 FR 38192.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given by the Treasury that the above-named companies formally changed their “Business Address” as follows:

American Economy Insurance Company (NAIC #19690). Business Address: 350 E. 96th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46240.

American States Insurance Company (NAIC #19704). Business Address: 350 E. 96th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46240.

SAFECO Insurance Company of Illinois (NAIC #39012). Business Address: 27201 Bella Vista Parkway, Suite 130, Warrenville, IL 60555.

Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2010 Revision, to reflect these changes.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: March 11, 2011.

Laura Carrico,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.

[FR Doc. 2011-9636 Filed 4-20-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M