alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1478. Reimbursement of program expenses from sources other than appropriations; disposition of receipts

The Secretary shall, when he finds it in the public interest, request and accept reimbursement from any cooperating governmental or private source in a foreign country, or from State or local governmental institutions or private sources in the United States, for all or part of the expenses of any portion of the program undertaken hereunder. The amounts so received shall be covered into the Treasury as miscellaneous receipts.

(Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title IX, §901, 62 Stat. 13.)
#### § 663.410 What is an Individual Training Account (ITA)?

The ITA is established on behalf of a participant. WIA title I adult and dislocated workers purchase training services from eligible providers they select in consultation with the case manager. Payments from ITA's may be made in a variety of ways, including the electronic transfer of funds through financial institutions, vouchers, or other appropriate methods. Payments may also be made incrementally; through payment of a portion of the costs at different points in the training course. (WIA sec. 134(d)(4)(G).)
### §290l–6. Effectiveness of Agreement

The Agreement shall have full force and effect in the United States, its territories and possessions, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, upon acceptance of membership by the United States in the Bank and the entry into force of the Agreement.

(Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(c)(8), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2035.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.463 Public disclosure.

The Department will maintain an electronic file accessible to the public with information on all employers applying for TLCs. The database will include such information as the number of workers requested, the date filed, the date decided, and the final disposition.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10145

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DONALD RAY MCCOWEN, also known as OU,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:14-CR-73-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Donald Ray 

McCowen has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). McCowen has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10145 Document: 00513382850 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
No. 15-10145

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10145 Document: 00513382850 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2016
### §286nn. Approval of contributions for debt reductions for the poorest countries

For the purpose of mobilizing the resources of the Fund in order to help reduce poverty and improve the lives of residents of poor countries and, in particular, to allow those poor countries with unsustainable debt burdens to receive deeper, broader, and faster debt relief, without allowing gold to reach the open market or otherwise adversely affecting the market price of gold, the Secretary of the Treasury is authorized to instruct the United States Executive Director of the Fund to vote—

(1) to approve an arrangement whereby the Fund—

(A) sells a quantity of its gold at prevailing market prices to a member or members in nonpublic transactions sufficient to generate 2.226 billion Special Drawing Rights in profits on such sales;

(B) immediately after, and in conjunction with each such sale, accepts payment by such member or members of such gold to satisfy existing repurchase obligations of such member or members so that the Fund retains ownership of the gold at the conclusion of such payment; and

(C) uses the earnings on the investment of the profits of such sales through a separate subaccount, only for the purpose of providing debt relief from the Fund under the modified Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative (as defined in section 262p–6 of this title); and

(2) to support a decision that shall terminate the Special Contingency Account 2 (SCA–2) of the Fund so that the funds in the SCA–2 shall be made available to the poorest countries. Any funds attributable to the United States participation in SCA–2 shall be used only for debt relief from the Fund under the modified HIPC Initiative.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §62, as added Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(5) [title V, §503(a)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–316; amended Pub. L. 106–429, §101(a) [title VIII, §801(a)], Nov. 6, 2000, 114 Stat. 1900, 1900A–64.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

2000—Par. (1)(B), (D). Pub. L. 106–429 inserted "and" at end of subpar. (B) and struck out subpar. (D) which read as follows: "shall not use more than 9/14 of the earnings on the investment of the profits of such sales; and".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Certification to Congress Relating To Use of Profits To Augment International Monetary Fund

Pub. L. 106–113, div. B, §1000(a)(5) [title V, §503(b)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A–316, provided that: "Within 15 days after the United States Executive Director casts the votes necessary to carry out the instruction described in section 62 of the Bretton Woods Agreements Act [22 U.S.C. 286nn], the Secretary of the Treasury shall certify to the Congress that neither the profits nor the earnings on the investment of profits from the gold sales made pursuant to the instruction or of the funds attributable to United States participation in SCA–2 will be used to augment the resources of any reserve account of the International Monetary Fund for the purpose of making loans."
```

[House Report 111-441]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

111th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     111-441

======================================================================

 
      PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES

                                _______
                                

   March 17, 2010.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                      [To accompany H. Res. 1190]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 1190, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution authorizes the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules at any time through the 
calendar day of March 21, 2010. The resolution also provides 
that the Speaker or her designee shall consult with the 
Minority Leader or his designee on the designation of any 
matter for consideration under suspension of the rules pursuant 
to the resolution.

                                  

```
§ 618.740 Evidence of qualification for Basic, Additional, and Completion Trade Readjustment Allowances. ( a ) *State action.* When an AAW applies for Basic, Additional, or Completion TRA, the State having jurisdiction under § 618.820 (determinations of eligibility; notices to individuals) must obtain information necessary to establish: ( 1 ) Whether the AAW meets the qualifying requirements in § 618.720 for Basic TRA, in § 618.760 for Additional TRA, or in § 618.765 for Completion TRA; and
( 2 ) For a partially separated AAW, the average weekly hours and average weekly wage in adversely affected employment.
( b ) *Insufficient data.* If information specified in paragraph (a) of this section is not available from State records or from any employer, the State must require the AAW to submit a signed statement setting forth such information as may be required for the State to make the determinations required by paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) *Verification.* A statement made under paragraph (b) of this section must be certified by the AAW to be true to the best of the worker's knowledge and belief and must be supported by evidence including W-2 forms, paycheck stubs, union records, income tax returns, or statements of fellow workers, and must, whenever possible, be verified by the employer.
( d ) *Determinations.* The State must make the necessary determinations on the basis of information obtained under this section, except that if, after reviewing information obtained under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section against other available data, including agency records, it concludes that such information is not reasonably accurate, it must make the determination on the basis of the best available information.
( e ) *Timing.* The State must follow the established method used for processing regular UI claims. If an employer does not respond within the timeframe established for UI claims, then the State must act on the best available information.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Humphreys, O’ Brien and Senior Judge Bumgardner

NESTLE USA, INC. AND ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0528-15-1 PER CURIAM JULY 14, 2015 KEITH P. ELLIS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Tenley Carroll Seli; Billy & Seli, PC, on brief), for appellants. (Adam B. Shall; Philip J. Geib , P.C., on brief), for appellee.

Nestle USA, Inc. and Ace American Insura nce Company (employer) a ppeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding bene fits for an injury to the left shoulder of Keith P. Ellis (claimant). Employer contends the commission erred in holding (1) claimant’s claim for medical and indemnity benefits for hi s left shoulder is not barred by the statute of limitations; (2) the exception addr essed in Corporate Res. Mgmt, Inc. v. Southers, 51 Va. App. 118, 655 S.E.2d 34 (2008) ( en banc ), was applicable to claima nt’s claim for medical and indemnity benefits for his left shoulder; and (3) there was credible evidence that claimant sustained a compensable injury by accident to his le ft shoulder on November 3, 2011. We have

reviewed the record and the comm ission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its fi nal opinion. See Ellis v. Nestle USA, Inc., VWC File No. VA00000538586 (M ar. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.UNPUBLISHED- 2 - in the materials before the Cour t and argument would not aid the de cisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                         199,409
<SECURITIES>                                   181,176
<RECEIVABLES>                                  355,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (24,326)
<INVENTORY>                                    194,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               998,266
<PP&E>                                         383,071
<DEPRECIATION>                               (187,570)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,254,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          330,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       492,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     296,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,254,180
<SALES>                                      1,060,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,060,833
<CGS>                                          502,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  723,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               211,930
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,885
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,475
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                120,143
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    73,766
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**GUILLERMO ALMANZA-GONZALEZ, JR.,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 419 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 18th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (No.’s
      333-139309 and 333-145241) on Form S-8 of Neuro-Hitech, Inc. of our report
      dated
      March 28, 2008 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements
      which, appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Neuro-Hitech, Inc. for
      the
      year ended December 31, 2007.








/s/
      Moore
      Stephens, P.C.


MOORE
      STEPHENS, P.C.


Certified
      Public Accountants





New
      York,
      New York


April
      9,
      2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                         311,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,295,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,315,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,551,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,804,000
<PP&E>                                       8,006,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,429,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,803,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,632,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  9,177,000
<COMMON>                                       168,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     221,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,803,000
<SALES>                                     17,185,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,185,000
<CGS>                                       13,250,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,466,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               531,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             426,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (812,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (812,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (812,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
|   | (i) | the      Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year ended      December 31, 2009 (the “Form      10-K/A”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C.      78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the      information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dated:      April 30, 2010 |
|--------|----------------------------|

|                            |
|---------------------------------|
| /S/ MATTHEW S.      PORTER |
| Matthew      S. Porter          |
| Chief      Financial Officer    |
#### D. Richard Statile, Respondent, v. Fawcett Publications, Inc., Appellant.

— Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Present — Glennon, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 312

 310

 314

 318

 308

 284

 273

 277

 289

 285

 291

 313

 303

 291

 292

 300

 305

 313

 314

 308

 315

 316

 298

 305

 312

 314

 325

 337

 338

 345

 236

 235

 204

 194

 186

 173

 184

 188

 199

 203

 204

 213

 211

 208

 216

 222

 226

 220

 218

 222

 215

 226

 213

 222

 236

 221

 211

 232

 246

 258

 277

 277

 272

 270

 258

 252

 247

 250

 255

 261

 262

 271

 265

 259

 263

 269

 272

 275

 274

 271

 274

 282

 275

 289

 293

 291

 298

 312

 318

 328

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

APRIL 2014 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 6, 2014

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 35 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-141758) and Amendment No. 356 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08441), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 2, 2018, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 12, 2018, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.


 


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




  


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


November 13, 2018
EXHIBIT 23.2


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


     We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of First  Advantage  Corporation of our report dated March
24, 2003, except for the subsequent events described in Note 16 to the financial
statements as to which the date is April 1, 2003,  relating to the  consolidated
financial  statements  of US  SEARCH.com  Inc.,  which  appears in  Registration
Statement No. 333-102565 on Form S-4.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Century City, California
June 4, 2003
###### Editorial Note on Part 601

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 601 appear at 71 FR 35512, June 21, 2006.

#### § 601.7 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.2030 Optional supplementation: Variations in payments. ( a ) *Payment level.* The level of State supplementary payments may vary for each category the State elects to include in its federally administered supplement. These categorical variations of payment levels must be specified in the agreement between the Commissioner and the State. If any State has in effect for July 1974 an agreement which provides for variations in addition to those specified in this section, the State may, at its option, continue such variations but only for periods ending before July 1, 1976. ( 1 ) *Geographical variations.* A State may elect to include two different geographical variations. A third may be elected if adequate justification, e.g., substantial differences in living costs, can be demonstrated. All such variations must be readily identifiable by county or ZIP code or other readily identifiable factor.
( 2 ) *Living arrangements.* In addition, a State may elect up to six variations in recognition of the different needs which result from various living arrangements. If a State elects six payment level variations based on differences in living arrangements, one of these six variations must apply only to individuals in Medicaid facilities, that is, facilities receiving title XIX payments with respect to such persons for the cost of their care (see § 416.211(b)(1)). In any event, States are limited to one payment level variation for residents of Medicaid facilities. Types of other living arrangements for which payment variations may be allowed include arrangements such as: ( i ) Living alone;
( ii ) Living with an ineligible spouse;
( iii ) Personal care facility; or,
( iv ) Domiciliary or congregate care facility.
( b ) *Relationship to actual cost differences.* Under the agreement, variations in State supplementary payment levels will be permitted for each living arrangement the State elects. These differences must be based on rational distinctions between both the types of living arrangements and the costs of those arrangements.
( c ) *Effective month of State supplementary payment category.* The State supplementary payment category which applies in the current month will be used to determine the State payment level in that month. This rule applies even if the countable income in a prior month is used to determine the amount of State supplementary payment.
[40 FR 7640, Feb. 21, 1975, as amended at 50 FR 48579, Nov. 26, 1985; 56 FR 41455, Aug. 21, 1991; 62 FR 38455, July 18, 1997]