alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §§2180, 2180a. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–424, title I, §102(g)(1)(A), Oct. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 942

Section 2180, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §220, as added Pub. L. 91–175, pt. I, §104, Dec. 30, 1969, 83 Stat. 807, related to programs for peaceful communications using television, etc., for educational, health, etc., purposes.

Section 2180a, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. I, §220A, as added Pub. L. 92–226, pt. I, §102(c), Feb. 7, 1972, 86 Stat. 22, related to assistance in the reopening of the Suez Canal.

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of Repeal

Repeal effective Oct. 1, 1978, see section 605 of Pub. L. 95–424, set out as an Effective Date of 1978 Amendment note under section 2151 of this title.
**Exhibit 10.44**

 

BONUS AGREEMENT

 

155East Tropicana LLC, dba Hooters Casino Hotel and Deborah J. Pierce, CFO herebyagree to a one time bonus in connection with the Purchase Agreement betweenHedwigs Las Vegas Top Tier, LLC (“Hedwigs”) and 155 East Tropicana, LLC.  This agreement does not modify, amend orsupersede the Change of Control Agreement dated March 23, 2007 or theemployment agreement dated January 2005 between the same parties.

 

Inrecognition of the additional work involved with assisting with the duediligence, negotiation of the casino lease agreement, and other dutiesconnected with the Purchase Agreement, the Company agrees to award Deborah J.Pierce a bonus of $40,000 at the time that the land, building, and non-gamingassets of the Company are transferred to Hedwigs or its affiliates.  If the Purchase Agreement is cancelled andthe aforementioned transaction is not consummated, Deborah Pierce will beawarded a reduced bonus of $20,000 in compensation for her efforts.

 

TheCompany may terminate this agreement and all of its obligations hereunder uponoccurrence of any of the following events: Deborah Pierce’s (a) materialbreach of this Agreement; (b) failure or inability to perform her dutieswithin expectations oh the company; (c) conviction of a felony or anyother crime involving moral turpitude or dishonesty which, in the good opinionof the Company, would impair her ability to perform her duties or the businessreputation of the Company; her failure or refusal to comply with the policies,standards or regulations of the Company; her unauthorized disclosure of tradesecrets and/or other confidential business information  of the Company; (f) breach of her dutyof loyalty; (g) act of fraud, misrepresentation, theft or embezzlement ormisappropriation of assets of the Company; or (h) failure to secure and/ormaintain her required licenses by governmental agencies with jurisdiction overthe business of the Company.

 
| Deborah  J. Pierce             |                   |   | 155  East Tropicana LLC        |
|--------------------------------|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                           |                   |   |                           |
| By:                            | /s/  Deborah J. Pierce |   |                           | By: | /s/  Michael J. Hessling |
|                           |                   |   |                           |
| Dated:  November 19, 2007 |                   |   | Title:  President              |
|                           |                   |   | Dated:  November 19, 2007 |
|                                |                        |        |                                |  |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-14-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-04-1998
<CASH>                                         665,000
<SECURITIES>                                12,489,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,681,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,442,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               865,000
<PP&E>                                      11,155,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (6,509,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,079,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,188,000
<BONDS>                                      1,577,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,938,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,079,000
<SALES>                                      4,204,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,204,000
<CGS>                                        3,443,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,443,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,867,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             305,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (889,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (889,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (889,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
### §4312. Presidential guidelines

The authorities granted to the Secretary pursuant to the provisions of this chapter shall be exercised in accordance with procedures and guidelines approved by the President.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title II, §212, as added Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §202(b), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 290.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 204 of Pub. L. 97–241, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
### §4821. Diplomatic Security Service

The Secretary of State may establish a Diplomatic Security Service, which shall perform such functions as the Secretary may determine.

(Pub. L. 99–399, title II, §201, Aug. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 858; Pub. L. 103–236, title I, §162(g)(7), Apr. 30, 1994, 108 Stat. 407.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–236 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows: "There shall be, within the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, the Diplomatic Security Service. The Diplomatic Security Service shall perform such functions as may be assigned to it by the Secretary of State."

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–236 applicable with respect to officials, offices, and bureaus of Department of State when executive orders, regulations, or departmental directives implementing the amendments by sections 161 and 162 of Pub. L. 103–236 become effective, or 90 days after Apr. 30, 1994, whichever comes earlier, see section 161(b) of Pub. L. 103–236, as amended, set out as a note under section 2651a of this title.

#### Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Victim Advocates

Pub. L. 117–263, div. I, title XCII, §9202(c), Dec. 23, 2022, 136 Stat. 3864, provided that: "The Secretary [of State] shall ensure that the Diplomatic Security Service's Victims' Resource Advocacy Program—

"(1) is appropriately staffed by advocates who are physically present at—

"(A) the headquarters of the Department [of State]; and

"(B) major domestic and international facilities and embassies, as determined by the Secretary;

"(2) considers the logistics that are necessary to allow for the expedient travel of victims from Department facilities that do not have advocates; and

"(3) uses funds available to the Department to provide emergency food, shelter, clothing, and transportation for victims involved in matters being investigated by the Diplomatic Security Service."
#### § 418.2201 When will we determine your income-related monthly adjustment amount based on the modified adjusted gross income information that you provide for a more recent tax year?

We will follow the rules in § 418.1201, except that any references in that section to regulations in subpart B of this part shall be treated as references to the corresponding regulation in this subpart.
### §286e–1m. Quota increase to 10,622,500,000 Special Drawing Rights

#### (a) In general

The United States Governor of the Fund may consent to an increase in the quota of the United States in the Fund equivalent to 10,622,500,000 Special Drawing Rights.

#### (b) Subject to appropriations

The authority provided by subsection (a) shall be effective only to such extent or in such amounts as are provided in advance in appropriations Acts.

(July 31, 1945, ch. 339, §61, as added Pub. L. 105–277, div. A, §101(d) [title VI, §608], Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–150, 2681–224.)
#### Ronald HICKMAN, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. Tracey A. JACKSON, Lieutenant; Carolyn Burrell, Sergeant; Virgil Haydon, Captain, Chief of Inmate Services; Edward Hull, Major; Herbert L. Wright, Lieutenant, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-7688.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 20, 2006.

Decided: July 24, 2006.

R. Johan Conrod, Jr., Kaufman & Cañóles, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Jeff W. Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, Pender & Coward, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Hickman appeals from the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and entering judgment in favor of Defendants in Hickman’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. Because neither party moved for a jury trial, the magistrate judge held a hearing on Hickman’s claim that his right to privacy was violated when he was seen naked by female correctional officers. The magistrate judge made detailed findings of fact that were adopted by the district court.

On appeal, Hickman challenges the district court’s credibility findings, asserting that Defendants’ witnesses’ testimony was “replete with contradictions and provable falsity.” Our review of the record does not support Hickman’s characterization. Instead, we find that Hickman’s allegations involve either non-material facts or are not supported by the record. In addition, we give great deference to the magis*242trate judge’s credibility determinations, because the magistrate judge heard the actual testimony. *See United States v. D’Anjou,*16 F.3d 604, 614 (4th Cir.1994). Thus, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
(No. 73—CC—125

#### Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Law Enforcement, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 11, 1973.*

Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Douglas G. Olson, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

*268Per Curiam.
### §641. Prohibition of subchapter I inspection of articles not intended for use as human food; denaturation or other identification prior to distribution in commerce; inedible articles

Inspection shall not be provided under subchapter I of this chapter at any establishment for the slaughter of cattle, sheep, swine, goats, horses, mules, or other equines, or the preparation of any carcasses or parts or products of such animals, which are not intended for use as human food, but such articles shall, prior to their offer for sale or transportation in commerce, unless naturally inedible by humans, be denatured or otherwise identified as prescribed by regulations of the Secretary to deter their use for human food. No person, firm, or corporation shall buy, sell, transport, or offer for sale or transportation, or receive for transportation, in commerce, or import, any carcasses, parts thereof, meat or meat food products of any such animals, which are not intended for use as human food unless they are denatured or otherwise identified as required by the regulations of the Secretary or are naturally inedible by humans.

(Mar. 4, 1907, ch. 2907, title II, §201, as added Pub. L. 90–201, §14, Dec. 15, 1967, 81 Stat. 593.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Subchapter effective Dec. 15, 1967, see section 20 of Pub. L. 90–201, set out as a note under section 601 of this title.
Exhibit 23.6

                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



         As   independent   public   accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation  by reference in this  Registration  Statement of our report dated
March 17, 2000 (except  with respect to the matters  discussed in Note 12, as to
which the date is September 6, 2000) with regard to the financial  statements of
Lighthouse  Global  Network,  Inc. and  subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and
1998,  and for the  year  ended  December  31,  1999,  and for the  period  from
September  4, 1998  (commencement  of  operations)  through  December  31, 1998,
included in the Form 6-K filed by Cordiant  Communication Group plc on September
25,  2000,  and to all  references  to our Firm  included  in this  Registration
Statement.



Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
September 25, 2000
Exhibit 99.1

                            [Letterhead of Dice Inc.]





November 12, 2001


Mr. Norbert Lou
Elliott Management Corporation
712 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY  10019-4108

Dear Mr. Lou:

Dice Inc. (the "Company") is in receipt of your letters dated October 11, 2001
and November 6, 2001 setting forth a proposal regarding the restructuring of the
Company's 7% Convertible Subordinated Notes. The Company's Board of Directors
has discussed and evaluated your proposal, and does not believe taking the
action suggested in your letters is in the best interest of the Company or its
shareholders.

Best regards,

/s/ Scot W. Melland
President and C.E.O.




cc:  Dice Inc. Board of Directors
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

Editorial Note on Subpart M of Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart M of part 655 appear at 75 FR 10403, Mar. 5, 2010.

§ 655.1235 What are the ALJ proceedings? ( a ) Upon receipt of a timely request for a hearing filed in accordance with § 655.1220, the Chief Administrative Law Judge shall appoint an administrative law judge to hear the case.
( b ) Within seven (7) days following the assignment of the case, the administrative law judge shall notify all interested parties of the date, time, and place of the hearing. All parties shall be given at least five (5) days notice of such hearing.
( c ) The date of the hearing shall be not more than 60 days from the date of the Administrator's determination. Because of the time constraints imposed by the Act, no requests for postponement shall be granted except for compelling reasons and by consent of all the parties to the proceeding.
( d ) The administrative law judge may prescribe a schedule by which the parties are permitted to file a pre-hearing brief or other written statement of fact or law. Any such brief or statement shall be served upon each other party in accordance with § 655.1230. Posthearing briefs will not be permitted except at the request of the administrative law judge. When permitted, any such brief shall be limited to the issue or issues specified by the administrative law judge, shall be due within the time prescribed by the administrative law judge, and shall be served on each other party in accordance with § 655.1230.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3
 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance
 
 Report of
Management on Compliance Report of Management on Compliance
  
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP Des Moines, IowaMarch 13, 2006




---



##### 



Report of Management on Compliance
  /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale




---



##### 



Exhibit A
Specified Standards
 I. Funding Agreement Payments
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and
 2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 II. Guarantee Payments in Support of the Payment of Amounts Due on the Funding Agreement
  1.
    
    calculated according to the terms of the Funding Agreement; and
 2.
    
    promptly paid, within two business days of the due date, to the Indenture
Trustee at the direction of the appropriate Principal Life Income Fundings Trust.
 III. Payments Under Indenture
### §2595a. Policy coordination concerning implementation of on-site inspection provisions

#### (a) Interagency coordination

OSIA should receive policy guidance which is formulated through an interagency mechanism established by the President.

#### (b) Role of Secretary of Defense

The Secretary of Defense should provide to OSIA appropriate policy guidance formulated through the interagency mechanism described in subsection (a) and operational direction, consistent with section 113(b) of title 10.

#### (c) Role of Secretary of State

The Secretary of State should provide to the interagency mechanism described in subsection (a) appropriate recommendations for policy guidance to OSIA consistent with sections 2551(3) and 2574(b) of this title.

(Pub. L. 87–297, title V, §502, formerly §62, as added Pub. L. 101–216, title II, §201, Dec. 11, 1989, 103 Stat. 1855; renumbered §502 and amended Pub. L. 105–277, div. G, subdiv. A, title XII, §1223(18), (21), Oct. 21, 1998, 112 Stat. 2681–772.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1998—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 105–277, §1223(18), in heading substituted "Secretary of State" for "Director" and in text substituted "Secretary of State" for "Director" and "2551(3) and 2574(b)" for "2551(d), 2562, and 2574(c)".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date of 1998 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 105–277 effective Apr. 1, 1999, see section 1201 of Pub. L. 105–277, set out as an Effective Date note under section 6511 of this title.
(No. 4266

#### Socony Vacuum Oil Company, Incorporated, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed May 9, 1950.*

W. W. Sleater, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Delaney, J.

The claimant, Socony Vacuum Oil Company, Incorporated, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of petroleum and petroleum products. During the years 1948 and 1949, claimant supplied gasoline, oil and grease to the various departments of the respondent.

*206From the report of the Division of Highways, which forms a part of the record, it appears that the claimant furnished gasoline, oil and grease to the various departments of the State of Illinois. The departmental report also shows that the sales tickets of claimant were not presented for payment by claimant before the appropriations and funds from which these invoices were payable had lapsed, but that sufficient unexpended balance remained had claim been filed in reasonable time.

Claimant furnished properly and duly authorized materials to the respondent, for which it has not received payment. This Court has repeatedly held that where materials or supplies have been properly furnished to the State, and a bill therefor has been submitted within a reasonable time, but the same was not approved and vouchered for payment before the lapse of the appropriation from which it is payable, an award for the reasonable value of the supplies will be made, where, at the time the expenses were incurred, there were sufficient funds ' remaining unexpended in the appropriation to pay for the same.

*Carl S. Johnson*v. *State,*16 C.C.R. 96; *Rock Island Sand and Gravel Co.*v. *State,*8 C.C.R. 165; *Oak Park Hospital*v. *State,*11 C.C.R. 219; *Yourtee-Roberts Sand Co.*v. *State,*14 C.C.R. 124.

The departmental report shows that the two purchases for oil and gasoline in the amount of $4.33, made by the employees of the Secretary of State, were paid by the employees at the time the materials were received, and the amount as set forth in claimant’s complaint will be reduced accordingly.

An award is, therefore, entered in favor of claimant for the sum of $77.77.
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.710 What is the procedure for filing a complaint? ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, complaints concerning misrepresentation in the labor condition application or failure of the employer to meet a condition specified in the application shall be filed with the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division (Administrator), ESA, according to the procedures set forth in subpart I of this part. The Administrator shall investigate where appropriate, and after an opportunity for a hearing, assess appropriate sanctions and penalties, as described in subpart I of this part.
( b ) Complaints arising under section 212(n)(1)(G)(i)(II) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(n)(1)(G)(i)(II), alleging failure of the employer to offer employment to an equally or better qualified U.S. applicant, or an employer's misrepresentation regarding such offer(s) of employment, may be filed with the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20530, Telephone: 1-800-255-8155 (employers), 1-800-255-7688 (employees); Web address: *http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/osc .* The Department of Justice shall investigate where appropriate, and take action as appropriate under that Department's regulations and procedures.
[65 FR 80210, Dec. 20, 2000, as amended at 70 FR 72561, Dec. 5, 2005]