alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 5

September 22, 2003

Chesapeake Funding LLC
307 International Circle
Hunt Valley, MD 21030


Dear Sirs:

     We have examined the Registration Statement on Forms S-3 and S-1 (the
"Registration Statement" filed by Chesapeake Funding LLC, formerly known as
Greyhound Funding LLC (the "Company") and D.L. Peterson Trust with the
Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, for the
registration of up to $500,000,000 principal amount of the Company's Series
2003-2 Floating Rate Callable Asset Backed Notes (the "Notes"), to be issued
pursuant to the Base Indenture dated as of June 30, 1999, as supplemented by
Supplemental Indenture No. 1 thereto, dated as of October 28, 1999, Supplemental
Indenture No. 2 thereto, dated as of May 27, 2003, Supplemental Indenture No. 3
thereto, dated as of June 18, 2003, and Supplemental Indenture No. 4 thereto,
dated as of July 31, 2003 (the "Base Indenture"), between the Company and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank (the "Trustee")
and a Series 2003-2 Indenture Supplement to the Base Indenture to be entered
into between the Company and the Trustee (the "Indenture Supplement").

     In our opinion, when the Notes have been duly executed, authenticated and
delivered against payment therefor and the Indenture Supplement, under which the
Notes are to be issued, has been executed and delivered, the Notes will be
validly issued and binding obligations of the Company and will be entitled to
the benefits provided by the Base Indenture and the Indenture Supplement, in
each case except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by bankruptcy,
insolvency or similar laws affecting the enforcement of the rights of creditors
generally and by general principles of equity (regardless of whether enforcement
is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law).

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm under the caption "Legal
Matters" in the Registration Statement.

                                                     Very truly yours,



                                                    /s/  White & Case LLP
### §283z–7. Limitations on policy based lending

The Secretary of the Treasury shall—

(1) take all necessary steps to encourage the Bank to limit the aggregate value of the policy based loans made by the Bank (other than policy based loans made to any country which the Bank has determined is economically less developed or has a limited market economy, which are used to purchase sovereign debt of such country or to reduce the debt or debt service burden of such country) during the 4-year period beginning on January 1, 1990, to 25 percent of the aggregate value of all loans made by the Bank during such 4-year period;

(2) take all necessary steps to encourage the Bank to limit the aggregate value of the policy based loans made by the Bank to the government of a particular country during such 4-year period, to 50 percent of the aggregate value of all loans made by the Bank to such government during such 4-year period;

(3) instruct the United States Executive Director of the Bank to explore with the other Executive Directors of the Bank ways to use a portion of the resources made available to the Bank by reason of the subscription and contribution described in section 283z–5(a)(2) of this title for debt reduction and debt service reduction for countries described in paragraph (1); and

(4) before the end of the 12-month period beginning on December 19, 1989, report to the Congress on the matters described in paragraph (3).

(Pub. L. 86–147, §35, as added Pub. L. 101–240, title II, §203, Dec. 19, 1989, 103 Stat. 2498.)
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

#### § 655.14 [Reserved]
(No. 74-CC-534

#### Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

*Opinion filed April 8, 1974.*

Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 97-30111

____________________

STEELE CONTRACTORS, INCORPORATED; ET AL PLAINTIFFS

STEELE CONTRACTORS, INC. PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT

versus

UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS;

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana, New Orleans

(95-CV-2520-E)

___________________________________________________

September 8, 1997

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

AFFIRMED for the reasons stated in the comprehensive and wellreasoned opinion by the Administrative Law Judge for the Corps of

Engineers Board of Contract Appeals and adopted by the United

States District Court.
#### Charles Lader, Appellant, v. Margaret Conklin et al., Respondents. Claire Waxberg et al., Respondents, v. Charles Lader, Appellant. Margaret Conklin, Plaintiff, v. Charles Lader, Defendant.

Appeal from an order made and entered by the Special Term of the Supreme Court held in and for the county of Sullivan, which order consqlidated two Bronx County Supreme Court actions with the Sullivan County action and changed the venue of the Bronx County actions to Sullivan County. Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Brewster, Poster, Russell and Deyo, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 26, 2013

jam

Order 

Clerk

November 26, 2013

147955 (30)

RANDY BERKSHIRE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 147955

CoA: 314467

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the 

order of November 5, 2013 is denied because it does not appear that it was entered 

erroneously.
### §§1891 to 1896. Repealed. Pub. L. 87–195, pt. III, §642(a)(2), Sept. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 460

Section 1891, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §301, 68 Stat. 841, stated Congressional declaration of policy and purpose for technical cooperation.

Section 1892, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §302, 68 Stat. 841, related to authority of President and defined technical cooperation programs. See section 2171 of this title.

Section 1893, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §303, 68 Stat. 841, enumerated prerequisites to assistance. See section 2171 of this title.

Section 1894, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II. §304, 68 Stat. 842; July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §7(a), 69 Stat. 285; July 18, 1956, ch. 627; §7(a), 70 Stat. 557; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §7(a), 71 Stat. 359; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. II, §204(a), 72 Stat. 265; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. II, §204(a), 73 Stat. 249; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. II, §203(a), 74 Stat. 136, authorized appropriations for technical cooperation programs. See section 2172 of this title.

Section 1895, act Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §305, 68 Stat. 842, related to limitation on use of funds.

Section 1896, acts Aug. 26, 1954, ch. 937, ch. II, §306, 68 Stat. 842; July 8, 1955, ch. 301, §7(b), 69 Stat. 285; July 18, 1956, ch. 627, §7(b), 70 Stat. 557; Aug. 14, 1957, Pub. L. 85–141, §7(b), 71 Stat. 359; June 30, 1958, Pub. L. 85–477, ch. II, §204(b), 72 Stat. 265; July 24, 1959, Pub. L. 86–108, ch. II, §204(b), 73 Stat. 249; May 14, 1960, Pub. L. 86–472, ch. II, §203(b), 74 Stat. 136, authorized appropriations for multilateral technical cooperation and related programs.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00159-CR

SCOTT ELDRED COALWELL,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-937-C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Scott Eldred Coalwell’s pro se May 5, 2016 letter is sufficient to serve as 

his notice of appeal;1 it was filed on May 20, 2016. The order of deferred adjudication 

being appealed is dated August 31, 2015. Coalwell’s notice of appeal is untimely, and we 

have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1); Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of 

 

1 A defendant’s letter that demonstrates a desire to appeal is sufficient to serve as a notice of appeal. See 

Palma v. State, 76 S.W.3d 638, 641-42 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002, pet. ref’d); see also Pharris v. State,

196 S.W.3d 369, 372 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).
Coalwell v. State Page 2

appeal is untimely).

Also, Coalwell signed a waiver of his right to appeal, and the trial court’s 

certification of defendant’s right to appeal in this case states that Coalwell waived his 

right to appeal. This appeal is therefore dismissed.2 See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. 

State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals ... must dismiss a 

prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”); Davis 

v. State, 205 S.W.3d 606, 607 (Tex. App.—Waco 2006, no pet.). 

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 26, 2016

Do not publish

[CR25]

 

2 A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the judgment or order of this Court is rendered. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1. If the appellant desires to have the decision of this Court reviewed by filing a 

petition for discretionary review, that petition must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals within 30 

days after either the day the court of appeals’ judgment was rendered or the day the last timely motion for 

rehearing was overruled by the court of appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a).
### §290j–1. Use of United States owned rupees to capitalize the Fund

(a) Subject to applicable requirements concerning reimbursement to the Treasury for United States owned foreign currencies, the President may make available to the Fund, for use in carrying out the agreement authorized by section 290j of this title, up to the equivalent of $200,000,000 in foreign currencies owned by the United States in India or owed to the United States by the Government of India. Such use may include investment in order to generate interest which would be retained in the Fund and used to support programs pursuant to that agreement.

(b) In accordance with the agreement negotiated pursuant to section 290j(a) of this title, sums made available for investment for the United States-India Fund for Cultural, Educational, and Scientific Cooperation under the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, and the Judiciary and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1985, and any earnings on such sums shall be available for the purposes of section 290j(a) of this title.

(Pub. L. 98–164, title IX, §903, Nov. 22, 1983, 97 Stat. 1051; Pub. L. 99–93, title VIII, §808, Aug. 16, 1985, 99 Stat. 452; Pub. L. 100–204, title III, §305, Dec. 22, 1987, 101 Stat. 1379.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1985, referred to in subsec. (b), is Pub. L. 98–411, Aug. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 1545. For provisions relating to contribution to the United States-India Fund for Cultural, Educational, and Scientific Cooperation, see 98 Stat. 1567.

#### Amendments

1987—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–204 amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: "Pending completion of the negotiation of an agreement with the Government of India, the annual earnings generated by the moneys appropriated by the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriation Act, 1985, may be used for the purposes set out in section 290j(a) of this title."

1985—Pub. L. 99–93 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
94°32' 94°31' 94°30' 94°29' 94°28' 

39°00' 

39°01' 

39°02' 

39°03' 

39°04' 

39°05' 

39°06' 

39°07' 

39°08' 

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

Prepared in cooperation with the 

CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI 

SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS REPORT 2006–5089

Blue Parkway gage, stage elevation of 758 feet—PLATE 4.5

Kelly, B.P., Rydlund, P.H., Jr., 2006

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

Estimated Flood-Inundation Mapping for the Lower Blue River in Kansas City, Missouri, 2003–05

By

Brian P. Kelly and Paul H. Rydlund, Jr.

2006

* #

* #

* #

* #

* #

A B C D E F 

13 

12 

11 

10 

9 

8 

7 

6 

5 

4 

3 

2 

1 

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003 

 and City of Kansas City, Missouri, digital data, 1:833, 2004

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

U.S. Geological Survey 

stage gage at 12th Street 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at Blue Parkway 

National Weather Service

flood-forecast location 

at Highway 40

U.S. Geological Survey streamflow 

gage at Stadium Drive 

Kansas City, Missouri, 

ALERT gage at 63rd Street 

EXPLANATION

WATER DEPTH, IN FEET, AT STAGE ELEVATION 

 OF 758 FEET AT BLUE PARKWAY GAGE 

 >, greater than

 0 to 1

 >1 to 2

 >2 to 5

 >5 to 10

 >10

LAND SURFACE BELOW RIVER STAGE

 (levee protected or unconnected to river)

STUDY AREA

GAGE OR FLOOD-FORECAST LOCATION

 (ALERT, Automated Local Evaluation in Real Time)

# *

BLUE RIVER FLOOD INUNDATION

0 0.5 1 KILOMETER 

0 0.5 1 MILE 

FORECAST LOCATION STAGE STAGE ELEVATION 

12TH STREET 29.5 744.0

HIGHWAY 40 25.5 747.1

STADIUM DRIVE 30.2 748.5

BLUE PARKWAY 35.5 758.0 

63RD STREET 50.0 771.8 

I - 435 

I-435 

Hawthorne Road 

 Trafficway 

Clary Boulevard 

I-70 

23rd Street 

U S Highway 40 

17th Street 

Road I - 435 

R

a

yto

wn

Coal Mine Road

Van Brunt 

Boulevard

Avenue 

Hard

esty

63rd Steet Brighton

L

e

wis

R

oad

67th

Street

Manchester

Gregory Boulevard

Drive Crest

A

venue
###### Editorial Note on Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart M of Part 655

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart M of part 655 appear at 75 FR 10403, Mar. 5, 2010.

#### § 655.1260 Can Equal Access to Justice Act attorney fees be awarded?

A proceeding under subpart L or M of this part is not subject to the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 504. In such a proceeding, the administrative law judge shall have no authority to award attorney fees and/or other litigation expenses under the provisions of the Equal Access to Justice Act.
<PAGE>   1
Three Months Ended Sept. 18, 1999 and Sept. 19, 1998:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            SEPT. 18,           SEPT. 19,
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE COMPUTATION:                                     1999               1998
--------------------------------------------                                     ----               ----
<S>                                                                          <C>                <C>
Numerator:

Net loss                                                                        $15,000           ($90,000)

Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares                                               13,822,543         13,822,543

Basic loss per share                                                              $0.00             ($0.01)

DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE COMPUTATION:
-----------------------------------------------
Numerator:
Net loss                                                                        $15,000           ($90,000)

Denominator:
Weighted-average common shares                                               13,495,838         13,822,543

Diluted loss per share                                                            $0.00             ($0.01)
</TABLE>
§ 404.811 The statement of earnings and benefit estimates you requested. ( a ) *General.* After receiving a request for a statement of earnings and the information we need to comply with the request, we will provide you or your authorized representative a statement of the earnings we have credited to your record at the time of your request. With the statement of earnings, we will include estimates of the benefits potentially payable on your record, unless you do not have the required credits (quarters of coverage) for any kind of benefit(s). (However, see paragraph (b)(3) of this section regarding the possibility of our estimating up to eight additional credits on your record.) If we do not provide a statement of earnings and an estimate of all the benefits potentially payable, or any other information you requested, we will explain why.
( b ) *Contents of statement of earnings and benefit estimates.* The statement of your earnings and benefit estimates will contain the following information: ( 1 ) Your social security taxed earnings as shown by our records as of the date of your request;
( 2 ) An estimate of the social security and medicare hospital insurance taxes paid on your earnings (although we do not maintain such tax information);
( 3 ) The number of credits, *i.e.*, quarters of coverage, not exceeding 40, you have for both social security and medicare hospital insurance purposes, and the number you need to be eligible for social security and also for medicare hospital insurance coverage. If you do not already have the required credits (quarters of coverage) to be eligible to receive social security benefits and medicare hospital insurance coverage, we may include up to eight additional estimated credits (four per year) based on the earnings you told us you had for last year and this year that we have not yet entered on your record;
( 4 ) A statement as to whether you meet the credits (quarters of coverage) requirements, as described in subpart B of this part, for each type of social security benefit when we prepare the benefit estimates, and also whether you are eligible for medicare hospital insurance coverage;
( 5 ) Estimates of the monthly retirement (old-age), disability, dependents' and survivors' insurance benefits potentially payable on your record if you meet the credits (quarters of coverage) requirements. The benefit estimates we send you will be based partly on your stated earnings for last year (if not yet on your record), your estimate of your earnings for the current year and for future years before you plan to retire, and on the age at which you plan to retire. The estimate will include the retirement (old-age) insurance benefits you could receive at age 62 (or your current age if you are already over age 62), at full retirement age (currently age 65 to 67, depending on your year of birth) or at your current age if you are already over full retirement age, and at age 70;
( 6 ) A description of the coverage under the medicare program;
( 7 ) A reminder of your right to request a correction of your earnings record; and
( 8 ) A remark that an annually updated statement is available on request.
[61 FR 18076, Apr. 24, 1996]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

DAY

 11,651

 11,081

 11,210

 10,066

 10,856

 10,556

 10,120

 8,790

 10,825

 11,313

 10,310

 11,959

 9,883

 10,563

 9,619

 241,317

 240,320

 238,831

 237,538

 235,224

 233,776

 232,116

 230,124

 226,968

 225,904

 225,356

 223,882

 224,049

 222,236

 221,159

 277,032

 278,599

 279,959

 282,396

 283,920

 285,668

 287,764

 291,086

 292,207

 292,783

 294,334

 294,159

 296,068

 297,201

 299,222

 858,024

 862,878

 867,090

 874,635

 879,356

 884,770

 891,264

 901,552

 905,023

 906,809

 911,612

 911,068

 916,981

 920,492

 926,751

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2011 SHASTA LAKE FLOOD CONTROL REQUIREMENTS RUN DATE: July 1, 2011

 252,968

 251,401

 250,041

 247,604

 246,080

 244,332

 242,236

 238,914

 237,793

 237,217

 235,666

 235,841

 233,932

 232,799

 230,778

 441,976

 437,122

 432,910

 425,365

 420,644

 415,230

 408,736

 398,448

 394,977

 393,191

 388,388

 388,932

 383,019

 379,508

 373,249

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 4,552,000

 1,090,839

 1,105,782

 1,120,725

 1,135,668

 1,150,611

 1,165,554

 1,180,497

 1,195,440

 1,210,383

 1,225,326

 1,240,269

 1,255,212

 1,270,155

 1,285,098

 1,300,041

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 3.0972

 SHASTA

INFLOW 

C. F. S. 

 PREV DAY

 F. C. PAR 

 (COL 3) 

 X .95 

 F. C. 

 PARAM 

 (COLS. 

 1 + 2 ) 

 .0356* 

 X DAYS 

 12/23 THRU

3/20 

 530,000

 MINUS 

 F. C. 

 PARAM

 (COL 3)

 COLS 

 4 X 5 

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (1,300,000 

 - COL 6 ) 

 MINUS 

 14,943 

 PER DAY

 AFTER 

 3/20 

 ADJUSTED

 F. C. 

 RESERV 

 (7-8) 

 PERM 

 STORAGE 

 COMMENTS:

 * LEAP YEAR CONSTANT = .0352 

 CONSTANT .0356 = 1,300,000 / (TOTAL DAYS X (530,000 - 110,000 ) )

 IF COL 3 IS GREATER THAN 530,000 OR LESS THAN 110,000 USE THOSE VALUES FOR COL 3 INSTEAD OF THE COMPUTED VALUE. 

 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 

 254,018
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****A model for evaluating streamtemperature response to climate change in Wisconsin**
 
Document
Appendices:One | Two
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.42/4-4:2014-5186
Item Number:0624-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000942871
 
April 26, 2018