alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
MOSS ADAMS LLP
--------------
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS                                        EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of Geographics, Inc. of our report dated May 7, 1999 incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10K of Geographics, Inc. for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1999.


/s/ Moss Adams LLP

Bellingham, Washington
June 28, 1999
#### LAKE COUNTY, Respondent, v. ORLAND TOWNSHIP, et al, Appellants.

(240 N. W. 861.)

(File No. 7038.

Opinion filed February 17, 1932.)

For former opinion, see 59 S. D. 340, 239 N. W. 852.

*Jones, Matthews & Fitzpatrick,*of Sioux Falls, for Appellants.

*Ira F. Blewitt,*of Madison, for Respondent.

*C. H. McCay,*of Salem, and *Alan Bogue,*of Parkers, for Ramsey Township.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause was orally argued October 3, 1931, and an opinion filed December 19, 1931, reported in 59 S. D. 340, 239 N. W. 852. Thereafter a rehearing was granted because by inadvertence some of the counsel entitled to notice of *500oral argument had failed to receive the same. The case was again presented on oral argument on rehearing on Friday, February 5, 1932-

FIaving carefully considered the further arguments of counsel as advanced on the rehearing, we are not disposed to recede from the views announced in the former opinion. That opinion is therefore adhered to, and the orders appealed from are reversed.

All the Judges concur.
(No. 74-CC-436

#### Metrogas, Inc., Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Conservation, Respondent.

*Opinion filed March 20, 1974.*

Metrogas, Inc., Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Howard W. Feldman, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

TRI QUOC DU, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF LAW 

EXAMINERS, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 152 MM 2014 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2015, the Petition for Review is DENIED.
STORAGE - A.F. CHANGE SHASTA NATURAL ACCUM * FULL

Day LAKE

BRITTON

MCCLOUD

DIV

IRON

CANYON PIT 6 PIT 7

RESERVOIR

TOTAL A.F. C.F.S. INFLOW C.F.S

RIVER 

C.F.S

NATURAL 

1000 A.F.

1 35,050 19,359 10,511 14,691 30,913 110,524 1,781 898 13,055 13,953 3,760.2

2 34,508 19,646 11,195 14,080 32,638 112,067 1,543 778 12,109 12,887 3,785.7

3 33,871 19,931 10,018 14,483 31,986 110,289 -1,778 -896 13,603 12,707 3,810.9

4 33,880 20,253 10,230 13,981 30,289 108,633 -1,656 -835 13,965 13,130 3,837.0

5 34,217 20,482 10,428 14,931 31,327 111,385 2,752 1,387 10,777 12,164 3,861.1

6 34,108 20,591 10,268 14,568 33,570 113,105 1,720 867 10,394 11,261 3,883.4

7 34,075 20,617 10,534 13,966 32,787 111,979 -1,126 -568 11,001 10,433 3,904.1

8 33,946 20,653 10,912 14,351 31,440 111,302 -677 -341 10,261 9,920 3,923.8

9 33,927 20,653 10,753 13,645 26,444 105,422 -5,880 -2,964 12,651 9,687 3,943.0

10 33,631 20,622 10,202 14,189 23,064 101,708 -3,714 -1,872 11,683 9,811 3,962.5

11 33,797 20,639 11,288 11,019 23,624 100,367 -1,341 -676 10,200 9,524 3,981.4

12 33,967 20,967 13,092 14,662 28,513 111,201 10,834 5,462 4,845 10,307 4,001.8

13 33,667 21,375 11,850 14,430 31,363 112,685 1,484 748 10,167 10,915 4,023.5

14 33,767 21,749 11,252 14,657 33,518 114,943 2,258 1,138 11,261 12,399 4,048.1

15 33,710 21,924 11,252 14,573 31,615 113,074 -1,869 -942 11,587 10,645 4,069.2

16 33,834 21,960 11,252 14,125 33,486 114,657 1,583 798 10,235 11,033 4,091.1

17 34,234 21,871 9,007 14,803 32,403 112,318 -2,339 -1,179 11,463 10,284 4,111.5

18 34,301 21,616 6,992 14,856 30,722 108,487 -3,831 -1,931 12,044 10,113 4,131.5

19 33,973 21,362 8,008 14,678 30,294 108,315 -172 -87 10,566 10,479 4,152.3

20 33,981 21,257 8,629 14,075 32,654 110,596 2,281 1,150 9,191 10,341 4,172.8

21 33,903 21,387 9,776 15,057 32,293 112,416 1,820 918 9,439 10,357 4,193.4

22 33,686 21,597 10,171 14,562 30,373 110,389 -2,027 -1,022 11,087 10,065 4,213.3

23 33,642 21,891 10,910 15,262 27,580 109,285 -1,104 -557 10,346 9,789 4,232.7

24 33,917 22,323 11,576 14,330 28,440 110,586 1,301 656 9,679 10,335 4,253.2

25 34,258 22,785 12,006 14,934 27,785 111,768 1,182 596 9,658 10,254 4,273.6

26 33,971 23,223 12,618 15,215 27,341 112,368 600 302 9,553 9,855 4,293.1

27 34,352 23,597 13,122 14,822 29,861 115,754 3,386 1,707 7,817 9,524 4,312.0

28 35,212 23,889 13,696 14,238 31,133 118,168 2,414 1,217 8,199 9,416 4,330.7

29 35,239 24,182 13,246 14,058 33,268 119,993 1,825 920 8,247 9,167 4,348.9

30 35,667 24,488 14,068 13,623 32,053 119,899 -94 -47 8,827 8,780 4,366.3

Totals 11,156 319,535

Acre - Feet 633,798

* October 1, 2023 to date

Historical Archive and Report Database

Full Natural Flow At Shasta Dam

Run Date: 5/10/2024

April 2024
§ 658.604 Assessment and evaluation of program performance data. ( a ) State Workforce Agencies must compile program performance data required by the Department, including statistical information on program operations.
( b ) The Department must use the program performance data in assessing and evaluating whether each SWA has complied with ES regulations and its State Plan.
( c ) In assessing and evaluating program performance data, the Department must act in accordance with the following general principles: ( 1 ) The fact that the program performance data from a SWA, whether overall or relative to a particular program activity, indicate poor program performance does not by itself constitute a violation of ES regulations or of the State Workforce Agency's responsibilities under its State Plan;
( 2 ) Program performance data, however, may so strongly indicate that a SWA's performance is so poor that the data may raise a presumption (*prima facie* case) that a SWA is violating ES regulations or the State Plan. A SWA's failure to meet the operational objectives set forth in the State Plan raises a presumption that the agency is violating ES regulations and/or obligations under its State Plan. In such cases, the Department must afford the SWA an opportunity to rebut the presumption of a violation pursuant to the procedures at subpart H of this part.
( 3 ) The Department must take into account that certain program performance data may measure items over which SWAs have direct or substantial control while other data may measure items over which the SWA has indirect or minimal control. ( i ) Generally, for example, a SWA has direct and substantial control over the delivery of ES services such as referrals to jobs, job development contacts, counseling, referrals to career and supportive services, and the conduct of field checks.
( ii ) State Workforce Agencies, however, have only indirect control over the outcome of services. For example, SWAs cannot guarantee that an employer will hire a referred applicant, nor can they guarantee that the terms and conditions of employment will be as stated on a job order.
( iii ) Outside forces, such as a sudden heavy increase in unemployment rates, a strike by SWA employees, or a severe drought or flood, may skew the results measured by program performance data.
( 4 ) The Department must consider a SWA's failure to keep accurate and complete program performance data required by ES regulations as a violation of the ES regulations.
[81 FR 56352, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 82736, Nov. 24, 2023]
#### Thomas Lyman *v.*John J. Smilie *et al.*

*Limitation—payment of taxes.*It is not sufficient, to create a har under the first section of the act of 1839, that the defendant has paid taxes for seven successive years under color of title, where the first payment of the taxes is not seven years before the commencement of the suit. v

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Will *county;*the Hon, Josiah McRoberts, Judge, presiding.

Mr. Edmund S. Holbrook, for the appellant.

Mr. G. D. A. Parks, for the appellees.

Mr. Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This was ejectment, in the Will circuit court, originally brought by Walter Wright, plaintiff, and against John J. Smilie and Patrick Richards, defendants, to recover possession of a certain tract of land, described in the declaration. The plaintiff having died, Thomas Lyman, as his devisee, was permitted to prosecute as plaintiff. There ivas a trial by jury, and a verdict for the plaintiff as to one-fifth of the premises, and as to four-fifths the jury found the defendants not guilty. A motion for a new trial was denied, and judgment was rendered on the verdict, to reverse which plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff made out a clear title from the government, and rested.

*260The defendant claimed to defend under the first section of the Limitation act of 1839. He succeeded in showing color of title and payment of taxes for seven successive years, and possession taken. . The infirmity of his case rests in this, that his first payment of taxes, to make seven years, was not seven years before suit was brought. Suit was brought December 18, 1875; taxes were first paid by defendant February 1, 1869,—not seven years before suit brought.

In *Clark*v. *Lyon,*45 Ill. 388, it was held, under the Limitation act, that concurrence of three things was required before the limitation is complete, namely: color of title, possession, and payment of taxes; and further, that the payment of taxes for seven years, coupled with color of title and possession, was not, alone, sufficient to create the bar; a period of seven years must have intervened the day when the first payment of taxes was made and the day of the commencement of the suit. To the same effect is *McConnel*v. *Konepel,*46 Ill. 519.

There not being the requisite concurrence to support defendant’s claim, judgment should have been rendered for the plaintiff for the land.

It was error to refuse a new trial, and for the error the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion*.*

*Judgment reversed.*
§ 609.13 Recordkeeping; disclosure of information. ( a ) *Recordkeeping.* Each State agency will make and maintain records pertaining to the administration of the UCFE Program as the Department requires, and will make all such records available for inspection, examination, and audit by such Federal officials or employees as the Department may designate or as may be required by law.
( b ) *Disclosure of Information.* Information in records maintained by a State agency in administering the UCFE Program shall be kept confidential, and information in such records may be disclosed only in the same manner and to the same extent as information with respect to State unemployment compensation and the entitlement of individuals thereto may be disclosed under the applicable State law. This provision on the confidentiality of information maintained in the administration of the UCFE Program shall not apply, however, to the Department or for the purposes of §§ 609.11 or 609.13, or in the case of information, reports and studies required pursuant to §§ 609.17 or 609.25, or where the result would be inconsistent with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act of 1974, as amended (5 U.S.C. 552a), or regulations of the Department promulgated thereunder.
[47 FR 54687, Dec. 3, 1982, as amended at 71 FR 35514, June 21, 2006]
§ 653.109 Data collection and performance accountability measures. SWAs must: ( a ) Collect career service indicator data for the career services specified in WIOA sec. 134(c)(2)(A)(xii).
( b ) Collect data, in accordance with applicable ETA Reports and Guidance, on: ( 1 ) The number of MSFWs contacted through outreach activities;
( 2 ) The number of MSFWs and non-MSFWs registered for career services;
( 3 ) The number of MSFWs referred to and placed in agricultural jobs;
( 4 ) The number of MSFWs referred to and placed in non-agricultural jobs;
( 5 ) The percentage of MSFW program participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit from the program;
( 6 ) The median earnings of MSFW program participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit from the program;
( 7 ) The percentage of MSFW program participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the fourth quarter after exit from the program;
( 8 ) The number of MSFWs served who identified themselves as male, female, Hispanic or Latino, Black or African-American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, or White;
( 9 ) Agricultural clearance orders (including field checks), MSFW complaints and apparent violations, and monitoring activities;
( 10 ) The number of reportable individuals and participants who are MSFWs; and
( 11 ) Any other data required by the Department.
( c ) Provide necessary training to ES staff on techniques for accurately reporting data.
( d ) Collect and submit data on MSFWs required by the Unified or Combined State Plan, as directed by the Department.
( e ) Periodically verify data required to be collected under this section, take necessary steps to ensure its validity, and submit the data for verification to the Department, as directed by the Department.
( f ) Submit additional reports to the Department as directed.
( g ) Meet equity indicators that address ES controllable services and include, at a minimum, individuals referred to a job, receiving job development, and referred to supportive or career services.
( h ) Meet minimum levels of service in significant MSFW States. That is, only significant MSFW States will be required to meet minimum levels of service to MSFWs. Minimum level of service indicators must include, at a minimum, individuals placed in a job, individuals placed long-term (150 days or more) in a non-agricultural job, a review of significant MSFW one-stop centers, field checks conducted, outreach contacts per quarter, and processing of complaints. The determination of the minimum service levels required of significant MSFW States must be based on the following: ( 1 ) Past SWA performance in serving MSFWs, as reflected in on-site reviews and data collected under paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) The need for services to MSFWs in the upcoming year, comparing prior and projected levels of MSFW activity.
[81 FR 56341, Aug. 19, 2016, as amended at 85 FR 628, Jan. 6, 2020; 88 FR 82729, Nov. 24, 2023]
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-144992 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-155288 on Form S-8 of our report dated August 31, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of SoleraHoldings, Inc., (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—aninterpretation of FASB Statement No. 109*, and our report dated August 31, 2009 related to the effectiveness of Solera Holdings Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofSolera Holdings, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2009. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

San Jose, California 

August 31, 2009
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of TechPrecision Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Molinaro, the Chief Executive Officer, and I, Richard F. Fitzgerald, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: July 16, 2012
/s/ James S. MolinaroJames S. MolinaroDated: July 16, 2012
/s/ Richard F. FitzgeraldRichard F. Fitzgerald
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Northern Explorations Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 26, 2008


By: /s/ Ralph Claussner
   ----------------------------------
   Ralph Claussner
   President/Chief Executive Officer


By: /s/ David Naylor
   ----------------------------------
   David Naylor
   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<NAME> Lear Corporation
<CIK> 0000842162
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                              32
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                        15
<INVENTORY>                                        481
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,202
<PP&E>                                           2,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                     656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,527
<BONDS>                                          3,273
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,703
<SALES>                                          5,921
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,921
<CGS>                                            5,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,363
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    15
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  90
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    206
<INCOME-TAX>                                        81
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                125
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       125
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.85


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

      ( print page 22171)    

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, June 2, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notice Improvement Project Committee will be held Thursday, June 2, 2011 2 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ms. Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: April 15, 2011.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2011-9601 Filed 4-19-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P