Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Notices 22147 

No comments or objections have been 

received. DEA has considered the 

factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 

determined that the registration of Lin 

Zhi International Inc., to manufacture 

the listed basic classes of controlled 

substances is consistent with the public 

interest at this time. DEA has 

investigated Lin Zhi International Inc., 

to ensure that the company’s 

registration is consistent with the public 

interest. The investigation has included 

inspection and testing of the company’s 

physical security systems, verification 

of the company’s compliance with State 

and local laws, and a review of the 

company’s background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, 

and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 

the above named company is granted 

registration as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic classes of controlled 

substances listed. 

Dated: April 13, 2011. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9611 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances Notice of Registration 

By Notice dated August 2, 2010, and 

published in the Federal Register on 

September 1, 2010, (75 FR 53721), 

Chattem Chemicals Inc., 3801 St. Elmo 

Avenue, Building 18, Chattanooga, 

Tennessee 37409, made application by 

renewal to the Drug Enforcement 

Administration (DEA) to be registered as 

a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes 

of controlled substances listed in 

schedules I and II: 

Drug Schedule 

4–Methoxyamphetamine (7411) ... I 

Dihydromorphine (9145) ............... I 

Amphetamine (1100) .................... II 

Methamphetamine (1105) ............ II 

Lisdexamfetamine (1205) ............. II 

Methylphenidate (1724) ................ II 

Pentobarbital (2270) ..................... II 

Codeine (9050) ............................. II 

Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. II 

Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II 

Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II 

Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II 

Meperidine (9230) ........................ II 

Methadone (9250) ........................ II 

Methadone intermediate (9254) ... II 

Morphine (9300) ........................... II 

Oripavine (9330) ........................... II 

Thebaine (9333) ........................... II 

Drug Schedule 

Oxymorphone (9652) ................... II 

Noroxymorphone (9668) .............. II 

Alfentanil (9737) ........................... II 

Reminfentanil (9739) .................... II 

Sufentanil (9740) .......................... II 

Fentanyl (9801) ............................ II 

The company plans to manufacture 

the listed controlled substances in bulk 

for distribution to its customers. 

No comments or objections have been 

received. DEA has considered the 

factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 

determined that the registration of 

Chattem Chemicals Inc. to manufacture 

the listed basic classes of controlled 

substances is consistent with the public 

interest at this time. DEA has 

investigated Chattem Chemicals Inc. to 

ensure that the company’s registration is 

consistent with the public interest. The 

investigation has included inspection 

and testing of the company’s physical 

security systems, verification of the 

company’s compliance with state and 

local laws, and a review of the 

company’s background and history. 

Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823, 

and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, 

the above named company is granted 

registration as a bulk manufacturer of 

the basic classes of controlled 

substances listed. 

Dated: April 13, 2011. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9620 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

FOREIGN CLAIMS SETTLEMENT 

COMMISSION 

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 2–11] 

Sunshine Act Meeting 

The Foreign Claims Settlement 

Commission, pursuant to its regulations 

(45 CFR part 504) and the Government 

in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), 

hereby gives notice in regard to the 

scheduling of meetings for the 

transaction of Commission business and 

other matters specified, as follows: 

Date and Time: Tuesday, May 10, 

2011, at 10 a.m. 

Subject Matter: Issuance of Proposed 

Decisions in claims against Albania and 

Libya. 

Status: Open. 

All meetings are held at the Foreign 

Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 

Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests 

for information, or advance notices of 

intention to observe an open meeting, 

may be directed to: Executive Officer, 

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 

600 E Street, NW., Room 6002, 

Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: 

(202) 616–6975. 

Judith H. Lock, 

Executive Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9682 Filed 4–18–11; 4:15 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6770–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment & Training Administration 

[SGA–DFA–PY–10–03] 

Solicitation for Grant Applications 

(SGA); Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Community College and Career 

Training Grants Program; Amendment 

Three 

AGENCY: Employment and Training 

Administration (ETA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice: Amendment to SGA/ 

DFA PY 10–03. 

SUMMARY: The Employment and 

Training Administration published a 

notice in the Federal Register on 

January 21, 2011, announcing the 

availability of funds and Solicitation for 

Grant Applications (SGA) for the Trade 

Adjustment Assistance Community 

College and Career Training grant 

program (TAACCCT) to be awarded 

through a competitive process. This 

amendment to the SGA clarifies items 

related to making portions of grant 

applications publicly available. The 

document is hereby amended. 

In Section IIIG3, of the solicitation 

(http://www.doleta.gov/grants/pdf/

SGA–DFA–PY–10–03.pdf), the following 

text should be replaced: 

Old Text—‘‘The Department is 

committed to conducting a transparent 

grant award process and publicizing 

information about program outcomes. 

Applicants are advised their application 

and information related to its review 

and evaluation (whether or not the 

application is successful) may be made 

publicly available, either fully or 

partially. In addition, information about 

grant progress and results may also be 

made publicly available.’’ 

New Text—‘‘The Department is 

committed to conducting a transparent 

grant application and award process. 

Among other things, posting grant 

applications on public Web sites is a 

means of promoting and sharing 

innovative ideas. For this grant 

competition, we will publish the 

Technical Proposal required by Section 

IVB, Part II for all those applications 

that are awarded grants, on the 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
22148 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 76 / Wednesday, April 20, 2011 / Notices 

Department’s Web site or a similar 

location. Additionally, in accordance 

with Section IVB, Part IIIa, of the SGA, 

which states that the Abstracts will be 

shared publicly, we will publish the 

Abstracts for all applications on the 

Department’s Web site or similar 

location. No other attachments to the 

application will be published. The 

Technical Proposals and Abstracts will 

not be published until after grants are 

awarded.’’ 

DOL recognizes that grant 

applications sometimes contain 

information that an applicant may 

consider proprietary or business 

confidential, or they may contain 

personally identifiable information. 

Information is considered proprietary or 

confidential commercial/business 

information when it is not usually 

disclosed outside your organization, and 

when its disclosure is likely to cause 

you substantial competitive harm. 

Personally identifiable information is 

information that can be used to 

distinguish or trace an individual’s 

identity, such as a name, social security 

number, date and place of birth, 

mother’s maiden name, or biometric 

records, or any other information that is 

linked or linkable to an individual, such 

as medical, educational, financial, and 

employment information. 

In order to ensure that such 

information is properly protected from 

disclosure when DOL posts the winning 

Technical Proposals, applicants whose 

technical proposals will be posted will 

be asked to submit a second redacted 

version of their Technical Proposal, 

with proprietary, confidential 

commercial/business, and personally 

identifiable information redacted. All 

non-public information about the 

applicant’s and consortium members’ 

staff (if applicable) should be removed 

as well. The Department will contact the 

applicants whose technical proposals 

will be published by letter or email, and 

provide further directions about how 

and when to submit the redacted 

version of the Technical Proposal. 

Submission of a redacted version of the 

Technical Proposal will constitute 

permission by the applicant, and 

anyone identified in the application, for 

DOL to post that redacted version. If an 

applicant fails to provide a redacted 

version of the Technical Proposal, DOL 

will publish the original Technical 

Proposal in full, after redacting 

personally identifiable information. 

(Note that the original, unredacted 

version of the Technical Proposal will 

remain part of the complete application 

package, including an applicant’s 

proprietary and confidential 

information and any personally 

identifiable information.) 

Applicants are encouraged to 

maximize the grant application 

information that will be publicly 

disclosed, and to exercise restraint and 

redact only information that truly is 

proprietary, confidential commercial/ 

business information, or capable of 

identifying a person. The redaction of 

entire pages or sections of the Technical 

Proposal is not appropriate, and will not 

be allowed, unless the entire portion 

merits such protection. Should a 

dispute arise about whether redactions 

are appropriate, DOL will follow the 

procedures outlined in the Department’s 

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) 

regulations (29 CFR part 70). 

Redacted information in grant 

applications will be protected by DOL 

from public disclosure in accordance 

with Federal law, including the Trade 

Secrets Act (18 U.S.C. 1905), FOIA, and 

the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a). If DOL 

receives a FOIA request for your 

application, the procedures in DOL’s 

FOIA regulations for responding to 

requests for commercial/business 

information submitted to the 

government will be followed, as well as 

all FOIA exemptions and procedures. 29 

CFR 70.26. Consequently, it is possible 

that application of FOIA rules may 

result in release of information in 

response to a FOIA request that an 

applicant redacted in its ‘‘redacted 

copy.’’ 

The Department is working with OMB 

to meet the requirements of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1965 

(PRA), and will not require any 

applicants to submit any redactions 

until the PRA process has been 

completed. The public reporting burden 

for this collection of information is 

tentatively estimated at six hours per 

response.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Melissa Abdullah, Grants Management 

Specialist, Division of Federal 

Assistance, at (202) 693–3346. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 14th day of 

April 2011. 

Donna Kelly, 

Grant Officer, Employment & Training 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2011–9514 Filed 4–19–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Petitions for Modification of 

Application of Existing Mandatory 

Safety Standards 

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Section 101(c) of the Federal 

Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and 

30 CFR part 44 govern the application, 

processing, and disposition of petitions 

for modification. This notice is a 

summary of petitions for modification 

filed by the parties listed below to 

modify the application of existing 

mandatory safety standards published 

in Title 30 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations. 

DATES: All comments on the petitions 

must be received by the Office of 

Standards, Regulations and Variances 

on or before May 20, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit your 

comments, identified by ‘‘docket 

number’’ on the subject line, by any of 

the following methods: 

1. Electronic Mail: zzMSHAcomments@dol.gov. Include the docket 

number of the petition in the subject 

line of the message. 

2. Facsimile: 1–202–693–9441. 

3. Regular Mail: MSHA, Office of 

Standards, Regulations and Variances, 

1100 Wilson Boulevard, Room 2350, 

Arlington, Virginia 22209–3939, 

Attention: Roslyn B. Fontaine, Acting 

Director, Office of Standards, 

Regulations and Variances. 

4. Hand-Delivery or Courier: MSHA, 

Office of Standards, Regulations and 

Variances, 1100 Wilson Boulevard, 

Room 2350, Arlington, Virginia 22209– 

3939, Attention: Roslyn B. Fontaine, 

Acting Director, Office of Standards, 

Regulations and Variances. 

MSHA will consider only comments 

postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or 

proof of delivery from another delivery 

service such as UPS or Federal Express 

on or before the deadline for comments. 

Individuals who submit comments by 

hand-delivery are required to check in 

at the receptionist desk on the 21st 

floor. 

Individuals may inspect copies of the 

petitions and comments during normal 

business hours at the address listed 

above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Barbara Barron, Office of Standards, 

Regulations and Variances at 202–693– 

9447 (Voice), barron.barbara@dol.gov 

(E-mail), or 202–693–9441 (Telefax). 

[These are not toll-free numbers.] 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES