alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.7

                             COMSHARE, INCORPORATED

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned
constitutes and appoints Dennis G. Ganster, Kathryn A. Jehle and Michael S.
Khoury, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution, and resubstitution for him and in his name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign a certain Registration Statement
on Form S-8 to be filed by Comshare, Incorporated relating to the Comshare,
Incorporated 1998 Global Employee Stock Option Plan and any and all amendments
thereto, and to file the same with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto such attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power
and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that such attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


Dated: 12/14, 1999                               /s/ John F. Rockart
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 John F. Rockart, Director
Exhibit 31Certification of DisclosureI, Mike L. Wilhelms, Chief Financial Officer at Triad Financial Corporation, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods included in the year covered bythis annual report, of Triad Automobile Receivables Trust 2005-A; 2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing agreement for inclusion in thesereports is included in these reports; 4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer under the pooling andservicing agreement and based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review requiredunder the pooling and servicing agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, theservicer has fulfilled its obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement; and 5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer’s compliance withthe minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided by an independent publicaccountant, after conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicingagreement that is included in these reports.      Triad Financial Corporation
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,022.09

 1,022.14

 1,022.34

 1,022.56

 1,022.66

 1,022.78

 1,022.89

 1,023.02

 1,023.12

 1,023.18

 1,023.28

 1,023.31

 1,023.36

 1,023.45

 1,023.52

 1,023.65

 1,023.68

 1,023.71

 1,023.73

 1,023.73

 1,023.74

 1,023.77

 1,023.78

 1,023.79

 1,023.77

 1,023.70

 1,023.65

 1,023.65

 1,023.63

 1,023.63

 1,023.60

 3,337.4

 3,338.7

 3,343.5

 3,348.9

 3,351.3

 3,354.2

 3,356.9

 3,360.1

 3,362.5

 3,364.0

 3,366.4

 3,367.2

 3,368.4

 3,370.6

 3,372.3

 3,375.5

 3,376.2

 3,377.0

 3,377.5

 3,377.5

 3,377.7

 3,378.4

 3,378.7

 3,378.9

 3,378.4

 3,376.7

 3,375.5

 3,375.5

 3,375.0

 3,375.0

 3,374.3

STORAGE

+2.7

+1.2

+4.9

+5.4

+2.4

+2.9

+2.7

+3.2

+2.4

+1.5

+2.4

+0.7

+1.2

+2.2

+1.7

+3.2

+0.7

+0.7

+0.5

+0.0

+0.2

+0.7

+0.2

+0.2

-0.5

-1.7

-1.2

+0.0

-0.5

+0.0

-0.7

CHANGE

 6,033

 5,427

 6,952

 8,208

 6,155

 6,112

 5,826

 5,639

 5,615

 4,677

 5,283

 4,821

 5,041

 5,209

 5,071

 5,684

 4,646

 4,791

 4,964

 4,483

 4,475

 4,499

 4,882

 4,988

 4,467

 3,835

 3,953

 4,562

 4,349

 4,530

 4,099

INFLOW

 4,684

 4,763

 4,454

 5,472

 4,878

 4,589

 4,476

 3,984

 4,273

 3,915

 4,049

 4,437

 4,410

 4,077

 4,128

 3,986

 4,247

 4,291

 4,652

 4,454

 4,308

 4,057

 4,694

 4,792

 4,678

 4,648

 4,512

 4,512

 4,538

 4,415

 4,411

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 0

 50

 43

 36

 50

 50

 0

 58

 108

 22

 0

 14

 14

 22

 79

 94

 29

 130

 65

 29

 43

 72

 65

 72

 36

 51

 58

 50

 58

 115

 58

C.F.S.

 .00

 .07

 .06

 .05

 .07

 .07

 .00

 .08

 .15

 .03

 .00

 .02

 .02

 .03

 .11

 .13

 .04

 .18

 .09

 .04

 .06

 .10

 .09

 .10

 .05

 .07

 .08

 .07

 .08

 .16

 .08

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 1.25

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2007 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 9, 2007

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS +39.3 159,276 137,784 0 0 1,571 2.18 1.25

ACRE-FEET +39,300 315,924 273,295 0 0 3,116

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 273,295

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 273,295

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 1.25

JULY 1, 2006 20.14

 3,334.8
§ 618.440 Applying for a relocation allowance. ( a ) *Forms.* To receive a relocation allowance, an AAW must apply to the State using the State's process.
( b ) *Submittal.* An AAW must apply for a relocation allowance and the State must approve the worker for a relocation allowance before the relocation begins. The State must make a timely determination on a relocation application submitted to allow the worker to promptly begin the relocation.
#### § 61.103 Examination of records of carrier.

Whenever it is deemed necessary, the Office may request submission of case records or may inspect the records and accounts of a carrier for the purpose of verifying any allegation, fact or payment stated in the claim. The carrier shall furnish the records and permit or authorize their inspection as requested. The right of inspection shall also relate to records and data necessary for the determination of whether any premium or other charge was made with respect to the reimbursement claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



             CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10Q of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and CEO, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Corporation as of and for the period covered
        by the Report.



                                  /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                  J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                  President and CEO


May 8, 2009
### §4311. Enforcement

#### (a) Benefits to foreign missions contrary to this chapter; standing of United States to bring action for compliance

It shall be unlawful for any person to make available any benefits to a foreign mission contrary to this chapter. The United States, acting on its own behalf or on behalf of a foreign mission, has standing to bring or intervene in an action to obtain compliance with this chapter, including any action for injunctive or other equitable relief.

#### (b) Advice of Secretary concerning transactions with foreign missions

Upon the request of any Federal agency, any State or local government agency, or any business or other person that proposes to enter into a contract or other transaction with a foreign mission, the Secretary shall advise whether the proposed transaction is prohibited by any regulation or determination of the Secretary under this chapter.

(Aug. 1, 1956, ch. 841, title II, §211, as added Pub. L. 97–241, title II, §202(b), Aug. 24, 1982, 96 Stat. 290.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Effective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1982, see section 204 of Pub. L. 97–241, set out as a note under section 4301 of this title.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 163

 146

 180

 182

 169

 165

 159

 157

 162

 171

 173

 179

 185

 189

 185

 180

 174

 164

 157

 154

 152

 151

 151

 153

 155

 157

 162

 162

 160

 158

 159

 100

 96

 101

 121

 121

 125

 133

 142

 145

 149

 150

 156

 161

 146

 140

 131

 126

 118

 115

 119

 128

 136

 143

 144

 148

 143

 135

 136

 137

 138

 138

 125

 120

 127

 151

 147

 145

 145

 150

 153

 156

 158

 164

 168

 170

 165

 157

 149

 140

 134

 137

 141

 144

 147

 150

 152

 151

 149

 148

 147

 147

 147

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JANUARY 2003 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 10, 2003

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
Exhibit 32.1











Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2010 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







April 1, 2010


/s/ Dr. Gioacchino DeChirico


Dr. Gioacchino DeChirico


Chief Executive Officer
§ 641.861 Must SCSEP recipients provide funding for the administrative costs of sub-recipients? ( a ) Recipients and sub-recipients must obtain funding for administrative costs to the extent practicable from non-Federal sources. (OAA § 502(c)(5)).
( b ) SCSEP recipients must ensure that sufficient funding is provided for the administrative activities of sub-recipients that receive SCSEP funding through the recipient. Each SCSEP recipient must describe in its grant application the methodology used to ensure that sub-recipients receive sufficient funding for their administrative activities. (OAA § 502(b)(1)(R)).
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 119 (Tuesday, June 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 36095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-15331]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN COMMISSION

Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Delaware River Basin Commission (``DRBC'').

ACTION: Public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DRBC will hold a public meeting via teleconference for the 
purposes of adopting its annual Capital and Current Expense Budgets for 
the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012 and establishing a budget and 
finance committee. A public hearing on the fiscal year 2012 budgets was 
held previously, on March 2, 2011.

DATES: The public meeting via teleconference will take place on 
Tuesday, June 28, 2011 at 1 p.m. and is expected to last for less than 
one hour.

ADDRESSES: The DRBC will provide public access to the teleconference 
from the Goddard Room of the Commission's office building at 25 State 
Police Drive in West Trenton, New Jersey. Directions can be found on 
the Commission's Web site at http://www.drbc.net.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 13.3 of the Delaware River Basin 
Compact provides that the Commission shall annually adopt a capital 
budget and a current expense budget. Section 14.4(b) of the Compact 
requires that the Commission conduct a public hearing before adopting 
the annual budgets. The required public hearing took place on March 2, 
2011.
    The Commission also will establish a budget and finance committee 
consisting of representatives of each of the Commission's five 
signatories, to provide closer oversight of budget development at a 
time when the fiscal challenges facing the Commission and state 
agencies are particularly severe.
    The meeting via teleconference is open to the public but will not 
include a public hearing, since such a hearing already was conducted. 
At the discretion of the Chair (currently Governor Jack Markell of 
Delaware, or his alternate), the Commission may entertain questions 
from the public before or after the business at hand is completed.
    The proposed budget resolution and accompanying budget document are 
available on the Commission's Web site at http://www.drbc.net.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela M. Bush, Commission Secretary 
and Assistant General Counsel, DRBC, at pamela.bush@drbc.state.nj.us.

    Dated: June 14, 2011.
Pamela M. Bush,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-15331 Filed 6-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6360-01-P
```
§ 641.821 What audit requirements apply to the use of SCSEP funds? ( a ) Recipients and sub-recipients receiving Federal awards of SCSEP funds must follow the audit requirements in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section that apply to their type of organization. As used here, Federal awards of SCSEP funds include Federal financial assistance and Federal cost-reimbursement contracts received directly from the Department or indirectly under awards by SCSEP recipients or higher-tier sub-recipients. (OAA § 503(f)(2)).
( b ) All governmental and nonprofit organizations that are recipients or sub-recipients must follow the audit requirements of OMB Circular A-133. These requirements are codified at 29 CFR parts 96 and 99 and referenced in 29 CFR 97.26 for governmental organizations and in 29 CFR 95.26 for institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other nonprofit organizations.
( c ) ( 1 ) The Department is responsible for audits of SCSEP recipients that are commercial organizations.
( 2 ) Commercial organizations that are sub-recipients under the SCSEP and that expend more than the minimum level specified in OMB Circular A-133 ($500,000, for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2003) must have either an organization-wide audit or a program-specific financial and compliance audit conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A-133.
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.991 If your medical recovery was expected and you returned to work.

If your impairment was expected to improve and you returned to full-time work with no significant medical limitations and acknowledge that medical improvement has occurred, we may find that your disability ended in the month you returned to work. Unless there is evidence showing that your disability has not ended, we will use the medical and other evidence already in your file and the fact that you returned to full-time work without significant limitations to determine that you are no longer disabled.

# Example:

Evidence obtained during the processing of your claim showed that you had an impairment that was expected to improve about 18 months after your disability began. We, therefore, told you that your claim would be reviewed again at that time. However, before the time arrived for your scheduled medical re-examination, you told us that you had returned to work and your impairment had improved. We reviewed your claim immediately and found that, in the 16th month after your disability began, you returned to full-time work without any significant medical restrictions. Therefore, we would find that your disability ended in the first month you returned to full-time work.

[50 FR 50137, Dec. 6, 1985, as amended at 65 FR 42791, July 11, 2000]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: REESTABLISHMENT OF THE 

MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE 

20th JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

:

:

:

NO. 473 

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of May 2022, upon consideration of the Petition to 

Reestablish the Magisterial Districts of the 20th Judicial District (Huntingdon County) of 

the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED that the 

Petition, which provides for the reestablishment of Magisterial District 20-3-04 within 

Huntingdon County as it currently exists, to be effective immediately, is granted; and that 

the Petition, which provides for the realignment of Magisterial Districts 20-3-01 and 20-3-

02, within Huntingdon County, to be effective October 4, 2022, is granted. 

Said Magisterial Districts will be reestablished as follows:

Magisterial District 20-3-01

Magisterial District Judge Douglas L. Gummo

Alexandria Borough 

Birmingham Borough 

Marklesburg Borough 

Petersburg Borough 

Barree Township 

Franklin Township 

Hopewell Township

Jackson Township 

Lincoln Township 

Logan Township 

Miller Township 

Morris Township 

Oneida Township 

Penn Township 
Porter Township 

Spruce Creek Township 

Walker Township 

Warriors Mark Township 

West Township 

Magisterial District 20-3-02

Magisterial District Judge Rufus S. Brenneman

Huntingdon Borough 

Mapleton Borough 

Mill Creek Borough 

Brady Township 

Henderson Township 

Juniata Township 

Smithfield Township 

Union Township 

Magisterial District 20-3-04

Magisterial District Judge Lisa M. Covert

Broad Top City Borough 

Cassville Borough

Coalmont Borough 

Dudley Borough 

Mount Union Borough 

Orbisonia Borough 

Rockhill Furnace Borough 

Saltillo Borough 

Shade Gap Borough 

Shirleysburg Borough 

Three Springs Borough 

Carbon Township 

Cass Township 

Clay Township 

Cromwell Township 

Dublin Township 

Shirley Township 

Springfield Township 

Tell Township 

Todd Township 

Wood Township
### Request for Inform ation FAA-2015-8663 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) Dear Mr. Hilgenberg: This letter is in regards to youramendment to exemptio n request Federal Aviati on Regulatory Docket No. FAA ­ 2015 ­ 8663. The amendment requests to operat e the SHOTOVER U1. Wit h full payload, this unmanned aircraft (UA) has a maximum take ­ off weight of 66 lbs. If th e petitioner’s intent is to operate this UA above the weight of 55 lbs the Federal Aviation Administra tion (FAA) requires the additional information not addressed in the SHOTOVER manu al to process your petition.

x A detailed description of the aircraft design and configuration for the SHOTOVER U1 UAS focusing on the UAS features and flight ch aracteristics to include, but not limited to: o Detailed 3 view drawings with scale of the aircraft and any launch and recovery equipment if applicable o Operational history with suppo rting statistics; particularly where Austin Hilgenberg was the principal operator o Results of analysis and flight testing of UAS o Lessons learned from repairs and alterations performed dur ing operations to include design changes and fixes due to operational failure(s) o Details of any injuries or property dama ge resulting from f light/ground operations o Safety analysis of any failure modes such as lost link, fly ­ away, loss of control, etc. x Copies of manuals, photographs, videos/t elemetry may be provided as support x Any other information to support an analysis of operational safety with unmanned aircraft in excess of 55 lbs. Please submit the addi tional information (non ­ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information is submitte d, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking number along with the information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information electronically via e ­ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 12/05/2016 . If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket withou t notifying you further. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent : Monday, November 21, 2016 1:04 PM To: A ustin@atopshot.com Page 1 of 1 Request for Information FAA -201 5 -866 3

11 /21 /201 6 https://email.dot.gov/owa/9 -AWA -AV S -333Exemptions@faa.gov/? ae=Item&t=IPM.Not...
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 272

 289

 406

 630

 623

 705

 1,100

 1,033

 336

 196

 160

 160

 182

 159

 156

 153

 165

 164

 181

 202

 330

 508

 500

 319

 307

 429

 367

 362

 619

 926

 134

 135

 141

 141

 137

 136

 138

 150

 140

 144

 138

 144

 136

 147

 130

 124

 105

 125

 122

 114

 116

 120

 116

 122

 130

 107

 209

 209

 210

 213

 164

 164

 178

 213

 210

 235

 316

 273

 170

 155

 153

 153

 155

 153

 146

 144

 142

 142

 146

 147

 160

 201

 192

 157

 166

 204

 245

 236

 266

 283

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

NOVEMBER 2002 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: December 9, 2002

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER