alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.1333 Termination at the request of the recipient.

A recipient, his legal guardian, or his representative payee, may terminate his eligibility for benefits under this part by filing a written request for termination which shows an understanding that such termination may extend to other benefits resulting from eligibility under this part. In the case of a representative payee there must also be a showing which establishes that no hardship would result if an eligible recipient were not covered by the supplemental security income program. When such a request is filed, the recipient ceases to be an eligible individual, or eligible spouse, effective with the month following the month the request is filed with the Social Security Administration unless the recipient specifies some other month. However, the Social Security Administration will not effectuate the request for any month for which payment has been or will be made unless there is repayment, or assurance of repayment, of any amounts paid for those months (e.g., from special payments which would be payable for such months under section 228 of the Act). When the Social Security Administration effectuates a termination of eligibility at the request of the recipient, his legal guardian, or his representative payee, notice of the determination will be sent in accordance with § 416.1404, and eligibility, once terminated, can be reestablished, except as provided by § 416.1408, only upon the filing of a new application.

[42 FR 39100, Aug. 2, 1977]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis NAPOLES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-40256.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Feb. 23, 2006.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Everto A. Villarreal, Edinburg, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Luis Ñapóles is appealing his sentence imposed following his guilty plea convictions for conspiracy to money launder and possession with intent to distribute more than 500 grams of cocaine. Ñapóles was sentenced to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 240 months for the money laundering offense and 300 months for the drug-trafficking offense.

Ñapóles argues for the first time on appeal that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by enhancing his sentence based on facts that were not admitted by him or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He argues that this was constitutional error in light of the *636holding in *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

The Government argues that the appeal should be dismissed because, as part of his plea agreement, Ñapóles waived his right to appeal his sentence or the manner in which it was determined. Ñapóles did not address the waiver in his brief or in a reply brief.

The record reflects that Napoles knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his sentence. *See United States v. Burns,*433 F.3d 442, 450 (5th Cir.2005); *United States v. Bond,*414 F.3d 542, 545-46 (5th Cir.2005); *United States v. Cortez,*413 F.3d 502, 503 (5th Cir.), *cert. denied,*- U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 502, 163 L.Ed.2d 365 (2005). Because the waiver is valid, the appeal is dismissed as frivolous. *See*5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Counsel Everto A. Villarreal is warned that pursuing an appeal despite a valid appeal waiver provision in the plea agreement and failing to address the waiver in a reply brief after it was raised by the Government in its brief is a needless waste of judicial resources and will invite sanctions. *See United States v. Gaitan,*171 F.3d 222, 224 (5th Cir.1999).

APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
#### Manocraft Clothes, Inc., Appellant, v. Simon Gittelmacher, Respondent.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Do opinion. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Van Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See *post,*p. 958.]
### §81. Administration by Regents of Smithsonian Institution

The National Zoological Park is placed under the direction of the Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, who are authorized to transfer to it any living specimens, whether of animals or plants, in their charge, to accept gifts for the park at their discretion, in the name of the United States, to make exchanges of specimens, and to administer and improve the said Zoological Park for the advancement of science and the instruction and recreation of the people.

(Apr. 30, 1890, ch. 173, §2, 26 Stat. 78; Pub. L. 87–360, Oct. 4, 1961, 75 Stat. 779.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Amendments

1961—Pub. L. 87–360 inserted "and improve" after "administer".

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Central Parking Facility

Pub. L. 115–178, June 1, 2018, 132 Stat. 1379, provided that:

#### "SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

"This Act may be cited as the 'Smithsonian National Zoological Park Central Parking Facility Authorization Act'.

#### "SEC. 2. FACILITY FOR IMPROVED VISITOR EXPERIENCE AND ACCESS AT THE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK.

"(a) In General.—In order to improve visitor experience and multi-modal access to the Smithsonian National Zoological Park, the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to plan, design, and construct a central parking facility on National Zoological Park property in the District of Columbia.

"(b) Central Parking Facility.—The facility authorized under this section may include parking, transportation improvements, visitor amenities including restrooms, a pedestrian bridge to a midpoint entry of the National Zoological Park, and ancillary works to accommodate alternative uses of the facility.

"(c) Funding.—Construction of the facility described in this section shall be conducted with funds from nonappropriated sources."

#### Establishment of Parks

The National Zoological Park was established under provisions of the District of Columbia Appropriation Act for the Fiscal Year 1890, act Mar. 2, 1889, ch. 370, §4, 25 Stat. 808, which constituted a commission to select from a certain district along Rock Creek a tract of land, including a section of the creek, suitable for a zoological park, and to purchase the land so selected, or take proceedings for the condemnation thereof, the United States to have title to the land on payment therefor to the owners.

The Rock Creek Park was established by act Sept. 27, 1890, ch. 1001, 26 Stat. 492.

The Potomac Park was established by act Mar. 3, 1897, ch. 375, 29 Stat. 624.

#### Addition of Lands

Certain parcels of land were added to the National Zoological Park by acts June 5, 1920, ch. 235, §1, 41 Stat. 892; Mar. 4, 1921, ch. 161, §1, 41 Stat. 1384.

#### Connecting Parkway

Provisions for a parkway connecting Potomac Park with Zoological Park and Rock Creek Park were made by act Mar. 4, 1913, ch. 147, §27, 37 Stat. 885.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY ELEV

 1,048.48

 1,048.03

 1,047.49

 1,047.00

 1,046.46

 1,045.91

 1,045.38

 1,044.85

 1,044.37

 1,043.87

 1,043.40

 1,042.87

 1,042.40

 1,041.90

 1,041.38

 1,040.90

 1,040.40

 1,039.87

 1,039.42

 1,038.91

 1,038.38

 1,037.90

 1,037.44

 1,036.97

 1,036.47

 1,035.97

 1,035.45

 1,034.91

 1,034.39

 1,033.86

 1,033.36

 4,021.2

 4,008.8

 3,994.0

 3,980.6

 3,965.9

 3,950.9

 3,936.5

 3,922.2

 3,909.2

 3,895.8

 3,883.1

 3,868.9

 3,856.4

 3,843.0

 3,829.2

 3,816.4

 3,803.2

 3,789.1

 3,777.2

 3,763.7

 3,749.8

 3,737.1

 3,725.1

 3,712.7

 3,699.7

 3,686.6

 3,673.1

 3,659.1

 3,645.7

 3,632.0

 3,619.1

STORAGE

-13.8

-12.4

-14.8

-13.4

-14.7

-15.0

-14.4

-14.4

-13.0

-13.5

-12.6

-14.2

-12.6

-13.4

-13.8

-12.8

-13.2

-14.0

-11.9

-13.5

-14.0

-12.6

-12.1

-12.3

-13.1

-13.0

-13.5

-14.0

-13.4

-13.7

-12.9

CHANGE

 3,728

 3,574

 3,604

 4,185

 3,141

 3,258

 3,301

 3,280

 4,099

 3,982

 4,035

 3,573

 3,918

 3,300

 3,383

 3,756

 3,364

 3,446

 3,723

 3,512

 3,416

 3,537

 3,987

 3,691

 3,664

 3,681

 3,277

 2,967

 3,252

 3,441

 3,293

INFLOW

 10,337

 9,572

 10,736

 10,707

 10,270

 10,551

 10,259

 10,261

 10,391

 10,491

 10,098

 10,481

 9,968

 9,756

 10,068

 9,921

 9,780

 10,287

 9,539

 9,992

 10,172

 9,662

 9,830

 9,750

 9,876

 10,014

 9,880

 9,758

 9,838

 10,073

 9,534

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 9

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 324

 242

 322

 241

 289

 256

 287

 255

 238

 285

 301

 260

 283

 275

 290

 266

 257

 233

 194

 325

 278

 247

 239

 154

 368

 245

 206

 274

 190

 265

 242

C.F.S.

 .40

 .30

 .40

 .30

 .36

 .32

 .36

 .32

 .30

 .36

 .38

 .33

 .36

 .35

 .37

 .34

 .33

 .30

 .25

 .42

 .36

 .32

 .31

 .20

 .48

 .32

 .27

 .36

 .25

 .35

 .32

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

AUGUST 2011 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: September 1, 2011

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -416.0 110,368 311,852 0 9 8,131 10.39 .00

ACRE-FEET -416,000 218,915 618,558 0 18 16,128

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 618,558

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 18

 618,576

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .00

JULY 1, 2011 .28

 4,034.9
Exhibit 5.1
   
 Re:
    
    WPX Energy, Inc.Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-173808)
  Registration Statement Company Commission Securities Act Shares
-  Sea Level Rise 
        -  Confidence 
        -  Marsh 
        -     Vulnerability   
        -     Flood Frequency    

Sea Level Rise**

Current MHHWNOAA Digital Coast××**-  ** Imagery 
-  ** Streets 
** Share Map     ×			Share this map		********Share Url:   **×			Sea Level Rise and Coastal Flooding Impacts			v2.0Close
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY ELEV

 1,018.56

 1,018.44

 1,018.21

 1,018.06

 1,017.98

 1,017.82

 1,017.64

 1,017.56

 1,017.42

 1,017.31

 1,017.16

 1,016.99

 1,016.77

 1,016.50

 1,016.25

 1,016.17

 1,015.99

 1,015.88

 1,015.80

 1,015.68

 1,015.50

 1,015.39

 1,015.28

 1,015.16

 1,015.13

 1,015.02

 1,014.92

 1,014.79

 1,014.68

 1,014.64

 3,252.3

 3,249.5

 3,243.9

 3,240.4

 3,238.4

 3,234.6

 3,230.3

 3,228.4

 3,225.1

 3,222.5

 3,218.9

 3,214.9

 3,209.6

 3,203.2

 3,197.3

 3,195.4

 3,191.2

 3,188.6

 3,186.7

 3,183.9

 3,179.6

 3,177.0

 3,174.4

 3,171.6

 3,170.9

 3,168.3

 3,165.9

 3,162.9

 3,160.3

 3,159.4

STORAGE

-6.2

-2.9

-5.5

-3.6

-1.9

-3.8

-4.3

-1.9

-3.3

-2.6

-3.6

-4.0

-5.2

-6.4

-5.9

-1.9

-4.3

-2.6

-1.9

-2.8

-4.2

-2.6

-2.6

-2.8

-0.7

-2.6

-2.3

-3.1

-2.6

-0.9

CHANGE

 3,251

 4,731

 3,809

 3,887

 4,264

 3,130

 2,893

 3,504

 3,463

 3,142

 3,583

 3,918

 3,607

 3,253

 2,979

 3,881

 3,122

 3,439

 3,538

 3,143

 3,579

 3,469

 3,387

 3,622

 4,098

 3,524

 3,527

 3,200

 3,313

 3,672

INFLOW

 6,072

 5,955

 6,339

 5,536

 5,060

 4,765

 4,894

 4,304

 5,039

 4,414

 5,181

 5,687

 5,942

 6,228

 5,743

 4,670

 5,064

 4,532

 4,267

 4,390

 5,470

 4,555

 4,425

 4,814

 4,295

 4,625

 4,504

 4,552

 4,407

 3,966

POWER

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

SPILL

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

 0

OUTLET

 317

 225

 246

 161

 168

 287

 161

 161

 105

 49

 203

 272

 293

 251

 223

 167

 208

 215

 222

 180

 249

 222

 270

 235

 159

 207

 207

 186

 207

 179

C.F.S.

 .45

 .32

 .35

 .23

 .24

 .41

 .23

 .23

 .15

 .07

 .29

 .39

 .42

 .36

 .32

 .24

 .30

 .31

 .32

 .26

 .36

 .32

 .39

 .34

 .23

 .30

 .30

 .27

 .30

 .26

INCHES

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .12

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .03

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

 .00

PRECIP

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2003 SHASTA LAKE DAILY OPERATIONS RUN DATE: March 12, 2004

IN LAKE

EVAPORATION

INCHES

C.F.S.

COMPUTED*

1000 ACRE-FEET

RELEASE - C.F.S.

RIVER

TOTALS -99.0 105,928 149,695 0 0 6,235 8.96 .15

ACRE-FEET -99,000 210,108 296,920 0 0 12,367

COMMENTS:

* COMPUTED INFLOW IS THE SUM OF CHANGE IN STORAGE, RELEASES AND EVAPORATION.

SUMMARY

RELEASE (ACRE-FEET)

POWER 296,920

SPILL 0

OUTLET

TOTAL

 0

 296,920

PRECIPITATION

THIS MONTH =

TO DATE =

 .15

JULY 1, 2003 1.72

 3,258.6
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 8 0 4 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. E M E D E N L O P E Z

- S A E N Z , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 7 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 2 3

- 1

B e f o r e J O L L Y , S T E W A R T , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t E m e d e n L o p e z - S a e n z h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s

v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. L o p e z - S a e n z h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 22 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-40804 Document: 00511149647 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/22/2010
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.573 How much will we withhold from your title II and title VIII benefits to recover a title XVI overpayment? ( a ) If past-due benefits are payable to you, we will withhold the lesser of the entire overpayment balance or the entire amount of past-due benefits.
( b ) ( 1 ) We will collect the overpayment from current monthly benefits due in a month by withholding the lesser of the amount of the entire overpayment balance or 10 percent of the monthly title II benefits and monthly title VIII benefits payable to you in the month.
( 2 ) If we are already recovering a title II, title VIII or title XVI overpayment from your monthly title II benefit, we will figure your monthly withholding from title XVI payments (as described in § 416.571) without including your title II benefits in your total countable income.
( 3 ) Paragraph (b)(1) of this section does not apply if: ( i ) You request and we approve a different rate of withholding, or
( ii ) You or your spouse willfully misrepresented or concealed material information in connection with the overpayment.
( c ) In determining whether to grant your request that we withhold less than the amount described in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, we will use the criteria applied under § 416.571 to similar requests about withholding from title XVI benefits.
( d ) If you or your spouse willfully misrepresented or concealed material information in connection with the overpayment, we will collect the overpayment by withholding the lesser of the overpayment balance or the entire amount of title II benefits and title VIII benefits payable to you. We will not collect at a lesser rate. (See § 416.571 for what we mean by concealment of material information.)
[70 FR 16, Jan. 3, 2005]
## Draft Proposal CB-13

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Area-Weighted U-Factor Provisions (CB-13)

Objective: Clarify the provisions in the code related to area weighted U

‐ factor.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C402.3.4 as follows:

C402.3.4 Area weighted U-factor. An area-weighted average U-factor shall be permitted to satisfy the

U-factor requirements for each fenestration product category listed in Table C402.3 separately for fixed

fenestration, operable fenestration and entrance doors . Individual fenestration products from different

fenestration product categories listed in Table C402.3 sh all not be combined in calculating area-weighted

U-factor.

Reason: Clarification and to increase simplicity of the code.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.732 No penalty deduction if you have good cause for failure to report timely. ( a ) We will find that you have good cause for failure to report timely and we will not impose a penalty deduction, if— ( 1 ) You are “without fault” as defined in § 416.552; or
( 2 ) Your failure or delay in reporting is not willful. “Not willful” means that— ( i ) You did not have full knowledge of the existence of your obligation to make a required report; or
( ii ) You did not intentionally, knowingly, and purposely fail to make a required report. However, in either case we may require that you refund an overpayment caused by your failure to report. See subpart E of this part for waiver of recovery of overpayments.
( b ) In determining whether you have good cause for failure to report timely, we will take into account any physical, mental, educational, or linguistic limitations (including any lack of facility with the English language) you may have.
[59 FR 1636, Jan. 12, 1994]
§ 404.1519i Other sources for consultative examinations. We will use a different medical source than your medical source for a purchased examination or test in situations including, but not limited to, the following: ( a ) Your medical source prefers not to perform such an examination or does not have the equipment to provide the specific data needed;
( b ) There are conflicts or inconsistencies in your file that cannot be resolved by going back to your medical source;
( c ) You prefer a source other than your medical source and have a good reason for your preference;
( d ) We know from prior experience that your medical source may not be a productive source, such as when he or she has consistently failed to provide complete or timely reports; or
( e ) Your medical source is not a qualified medical source as defined in § 404.1519g.
[82 FR 5866, Jan. 18, 2017]
### §3927a. Review by chief of mission

#### (a) Review of staff element under chief of mission authority; approval; process

The Secretary of State shall require each chief of mission to review, not less than once every 5 years, every staff element under chief of mission authority, including staff from other departments or agencies of the United States, and recommend approval or disapproval of each staff element. Each such review shall be conducted pursuant to a process established by the President for determining appropriate staffing at diplomatic missions and overseas constituent posts (commonly referred to as the "NSDD–38 process").

#### (b) Actions by Secretary of State

The Secretary of State, as part of the process established by the President referred to in subsection (a), shall take actions to carry out the recommendations made in each such review.

(Pub. L. 108–447, div. B, title IV, §409, Dec. 8, 2004, 118 Stat. 2904; Pub. L. 112–74, div. I, title VII, §7034(n), Dec. 23, 2011, 125 Stat. 1217.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Departments of Commerce, Justice, and State, the Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2005, and also as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005, and not as part of the Foreign Service Act of 1980 which comprises this chapter.

#### Amendments

2011—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–74 struck out subsec. (c). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: "Not later than 1 year after December 8, 2004, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit a report on such reviews that occurred during the previous 12 months, together with the Secretary's recommendations regarding such reviews to the appropriate committees of Congress, the heads of all affected departments or agencies, and the Inspector General of the Department of State."
### subpart xii—famine prevention and freedom from hunger
Exhibit 12.2
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of JA Solar Holdings Co., Ltd. (the
Company), as amended by Amendment No. 1 on May 25, 2011, Amendment No. 2 on June 15, 2011
and Amendment No. 3 on the date hereof; and2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.
  By:
    
    /s/ Anthea ChungName:
    
    Anthea ChungTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4130 

To temporarily prohibit the importation of certain iron and steel articles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2015 

Mr. NOLAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To temporarily prohibit the importation of certain iron and 

steel articles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Support Our Steel5 workers Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF STEEL PROD7 UCTS. 

8 For the 5-year period beginning on the 15th day after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act, an article classified 

10 under chapter 72 or 73 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4130 IH

1 of the United States may not enter the customs territory 

2 of the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS