alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Dara Khosrowshahi,
Chief Executive Officer of Expedia, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the Amendment) to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (together with the Amendment, the
Report); and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 29, 2016



/s/ DARA KHOSROWSHAHIDara Khosrowshahi Chief Executive
Officer
# Table 1

# missing stats

# Sheet1
#### Frank Nappa, Respondent, v. The Erie Railroad Company, Appellant.

—Judgment affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Kruse, J., on former appeal in same case, reported at 155 Appellate Division, 9. All concurred, except Foote, J., who dissented.
(No. 73-CC-55

#### Dictaphone Corporation, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Governor’s Office of Human Resources, Respondent.

*Opinion filed July 26, 1973.*

Dictaphone Corporation, Claimant, pro se.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricky COOPER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-3107.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 7, 2006.

Robyn Jones Hahnert, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Ohio, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Suzanna Kostovski, Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before KENNEDY, COOK, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying his demand for discovery and motion for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33. After hearing oral argument and reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this Court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

The Court also declines to review Cooper’s claim that he is entitled to re-sentencing in light of *United States v. Booker,*543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), as he failed to raise the claim in the motion that is the subject of this appeal. Had Cooper raised the claim before the district court, it would have been foreclosed by *Humphress v. United States,*398 F.3d 855, 860 (6th Cir.2005), because *“Booker’s*rule does not apply retroactively in collateral proceedings.”
### §4192. Repealed. Pub. L. 101–246, title I, §123, Feb. 16, 1990, 104 Stat. 27

Section, R.S. §4082, related to solemnization of marriages by consular officers of the United States in a foreign country.

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Pub. L. 101–246, §123, which directed the repeal of section 31 of the Act of June 22, 1860 (12 Stat. 79; 22 U.S.C. 4192), was executed as though repealing section 4082 of the Revised Statutes, which is classified to this section, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. Section 31 of the Act of June 22, 1860, was restated in section 4082 of the Revised Statutes and repealed by section 5596 of the Revised Statutes.
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1002 Definitions. For purposes of this subpart: *Act* means the Social Security Act, as amended.
*Class or classes of cases* means the categories into which disability claims are divided according to their characteristics.
*Commissioner* means the Commissioner of Social Security or his or her authorized designee.
*Compassionate allowance* means a determination or decision we make under a process that identifies for expedited handling claims that involve impairments that invariably qualify under the Listing of Impairments in appendix 1 to subpart P of part 404 of this chapter based on minimal, but sufficient, objective medical evidence.
Determination of disability or disability determination means one or more of the following decisions: ( a ) Whether or not a person is under a disability;
( b ) The date a person's disability began; or
( c ) The date a person's disability ended.
*Disability* means *disability* or *blindness* as defined in sections 1614(a) (2) and (3) of the Act.
*Disability determination function* means making determinations as to disability or blindness and carrying out related administrative and other responsibilities.
*Disability program* means the Federal program for providing supplemental security income benefits for the blind and disabled under title XVI of the Act, as amended.
*Initial* means the first level of disability or blindness adjudication.
*Other written guidelines* means written issuances such as Social Security Rulings and memoranda by the Commissioner of Social Security, the Deputy Commissioner for Programs and Policy, or the Associate Commissioner for Disability and the procedures, guides, and operating instructions in the Disability Insurance sections of the Program Operations Manual System that are instructive, interpretive, clarifying, and/or administrative and not designated as advisory or discretionary. The purpose of including the foregoing material in the definition is to assure uniform national application of program standards and service delivery to the public.
*Quick disability determination* means an initial determination on a claim that we have identified as one that reflects a high degree of probability that you will be found disabled and where we expect that your allegations will be easily and quickly verified.
*Regulations* means regulations in this subpart issued under sections 1102, 1631(c) and 1633(a) of the Act, unless otherwise indicated.
*State* means any of the 50 States of the United States and the District of Columbia. It includes the State agency.
*State agency* means that agency of a State which has been designated by the State to carry out the disability determination function.
*We, us,* and *our* refers to the Social Security Administration (SSA).
[46 FR 29211, May 29, 1981, as amended at 56 FR 11021, Mar. 14, 1991; 62 FR 38454, July 18, 1997; 72 FR 51178, Sept. 6, 2007; 75 FR 62683, Oct. 13, 2010]
### §282d. Federal Reserve banks as depositories

Any Federal Reserve bank which is requested to do so by the Corporation shall act as its depository or as its fiscal agent, and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System shall supervise and direct the carrying out of these functions by the Federal Reserve banks.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 788, §6, 69 Stat. 669.)
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K (amendment no. 1) for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
April 21, 2010





/s/
      Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 655
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 655 appear at 71 FR 35521, 35522, June 21, 2006.

§ 655.550 Public access. ( a ) *Public examination at ETA.* ETA shall make available for public examination in Washington, DC, a list of employers which have filed attestations under this subpart, and for each such employer, a copy of the employer's attestation and accompanying documentation it has received.
( b ) *Notice to public.* ETA periodically shall publish a list in the Federal Register identifying under this subpart employers which have submitted attestations; employers which have attestations on file; and employers which have submitted attestations which have been found unacceptable for filing.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under Control No. 1205-0309)
<page>   EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		November 14, 2005
#### Annie Feldman and Others, Respondents, v. Alexander Dickstein and Others, Appellants.

Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4345 

To expand the eligibility of individuals from Micronesia, the Marshall Islands, 

and Palau for participation in National Service Programs, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 7, 2016 

Ms. BORDALLO (for herself, Ms. GABBARD, and Mr. SABLAN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To expand the eligibility of individuals from Micronesia, the 

Marshall Islands, and Palau for participation in National 

Service Programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Community 

5 Service Improvement Act of 2015’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4345 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR NA2 TIONAL SERVICE PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS. 

3 Section 137(a)(5) of the National and Community 

4 Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12591(a)(5)) is amended 

5 to read as follows: 

6 ‘‘(5) is a citizen or national of the United 

7 States or lawful permanent resident alien of the 

8 United States, or is a citizen of the Federated 

9 States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall 

10 Islands, or Palau and admitted to the United States 

11 as a nonimmigrant under the terms of the applicable 

12 nation’s Compact of Free Association with the 

13 United States.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

15 The amendment made by this Act shall be effective 

16 for any participant in a program under the National and 

17 Community Service Act of 1990 selected after the date 

18 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00301-CV

HWAT, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND 

D/B/A HOME WARRANTY 

ADMINISTRATORS, Appellant

V.

EDDIE AGNEW, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at 

Law No. 2

of Tarrant County (2019-006741-2)

April 1, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is reversed, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with this opinion.

It is further ordered that Eddie Agnew shall pay all of the costs of this appeal, 

for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
#### Citizens National Bank, appellant, v. Isaac D. Gregg, appellee.

Filed February 17, 1898.

No. 7748.

1. Costs: Taxation: Review. Where costs have been illegally taxed, the EppioDriate remedy is by a motion to retáis-made to the court where the alleged mistake occurred.

2.--: Fee Bill: Injunction. A court of equity will not enjoin the collection of a fee bill where all the legal costs therein taxed have not been paid or tendered.

Appeal from, the district court of Howard county. Heard below before Thompson, J.

*Affirmed.*

*T. T. Bell,*for appellant.

*Paul & Templin, contra.*

Norval, J.

This is an appeal from a decree refusing to enjoin the collection of a fee bill issued out of the district court of Howard county, in a replevin shit determined therein in which the Citizens National Bank was plaintiff and one William W. Kendall, sheriff, ivas defendant. The writ of replevin was executed by Noah Baxter, the county coroner, who returned the process into court with an itemized statement of his fees, amounting to $15.50. The replevin suit was decided against the plaintiff, and judgment was rendered against it for all costs. The fee bill was issued under section 3, chapter 28, Compiled Statutes, for the said sum claimed to be due the coroner, with seventy-five cents additional for issuing the fee bill. The contention of plaintiff is that the costs have never been taxed in the replevin suit, and furthermore that the total amount of costs was not inserted in the judgment at.the time it ivas journalized. The record shows the rendition of a judgment against the plaintiff for the costs of suit; that the costs, including the amount due the *761coroner, liad been taxed by the clerk of the district court and itemized upon the fee book prior to the issuance of the fee bill. This was sufficient. If a mistake was malde in the taxation of the costs by the clerk, the appropriate remedy for correcting the error was by motion to retax. *(Woods v. Colfax County,*10 Neb. 552; *Cozine v. Hatch,*17 Neb. 694; *Whitall v. Cressman, 18*Neb. 508; *Wilkinson v. Carter,*22 Neb. 186; *Hoagland v. Van Etten,*31 Neb. 293.) In no event could plaintiff enjoin the enforcement of the fee bill until it had first paid, or tendered, all the legal costs chargeable against it. Unquestionably the sum of $3.75 was due from plaintiff as legal costs, of which amount $3 belonged to the coroner for serving the writ, and the remainder to the clerk for issuing the fee bill. Plaintiff paid all except seventy-five cents of said sum after the fee bill was in the hands of the coroner, but the bank could not invoke the aid of a court of equity, at least until it had paid all costs legally taxed against the bank. The decree is right and is

• Affirmed.
### §284l. Fourth replenishment; authorization of appropriations

(a) The United States Governor is hereby authorized to agree on behalf of the United States to pay to the Association four annual installments of $375,000,000 each as the United States contribution to the Fourth Replenishment of the Resources of the Association.

(b) In order to pay for the United States contribution, there is hereby authorized to be appropriated without fiscal year limitation four annual installments of $375,000,000 each for payment by the Secretary of the Treasury.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §14, as added Pub. L. 93–373, §1, Aug. 14, 1974, 88 Stat. 445.)
### §282. Acceptance of membership by United States in International Finance Corporation

The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the United States in the International Finance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation"), provided for by the Articles of Agreement of the Corporation deposited in the archives of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

(Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 788, §2, 69 Stat. 669.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Short Title

Act Aug. 11, 1955, ch. 788, §1, 69 Stat. 669, provided that: "This Act [enacting this subchapter] may be cited as the 'International Finance Corporation Act'."
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4275 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate a provision 

under the Medicare Advantage program that inadvertently penalizes 

Medicare Advantage plans for providing high quality care to Medicare 

beneficiaries. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2015 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. KIND, Mr. GUTHRIE, and Mr. 

MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to 

the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

a provision under the Medicare Advantage program that 

inadvertently penalizes Medicare Advantage plans for 

providing high quality care to Medicare beneficiaries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Advantage 

5 Quality Payment Relief Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 4275 IH

1 SEC. 2. RELIEF FROM QUALITY BONUS PENALTY IN CAL2 CULATION OF THE MEDICARE ADVANTAGE 

3 BLENDED BENCHMARK CAP. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1853(n)(4) of the Social 

5 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(n)(4)) is amended by 

6 striking ‘‘determined taking into account’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘determined without regard to’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) shall apply to plan years beginning on or 

10 after January 1, 2017. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.908 [Reserved]
### §423. Omitted

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section, act June 14, 1943, ch. 122, §2, 57 Stat. 152, related to retention for defense of United States of certain articles, information or service procured for foreign governments from funds appropriated by act June 14, 1943 or prior acts appropriating funds to the President for such purposes.
§ 422.803 Collection activities. ( a ) We will collect all administrative debts arising out of our activities or that are referred or transferred to us, the Social Security Administration, for collection actions. We will send an initial written demand for payment no later than 30 days after an appropriate official determines that a debt exists.
( b ) In accordance with 31 CFR 285.12(c) and (g), we transfer legally enforceable administrative debts that are 120 calendar days or more delinquent to Treasury for debt collection services (*i.e.,* cross-servicing). This requirement does not apply to any debt that: ( 1 ) Is in litigation or foreclosure;
( 2 ) Will be disposed of under an approved asset sale program within one year of becoming eligible for sale;
( 3 ) Has been referred to a private collection contractor for a period acceptable to the Secretary of the Treasury;
( 4 ) Is at a debt collection center for a period of time acceptable to Treasury (see paragraph (c) of this section);
( 5 ) Will be collected under internal offset procedures within three years after the debt first became delinquent; or
( 6 ) Is exempt from this requirement based on a determination by Treasury that exemption for a certain class of debt is in the best interest of the United States.
( c ) Pursuant to 31 CFR 285.12(h), we may refer debts less than 120 calendar days delinquent to Treasury or, with the consent of Treasury, to a Treasury-designated debt collection center to accomplish efficient, cost effective debt collection. Referrals to debt collection centers will be at the discretion of, and for a period acceptable to, the Secretary of the Treasury. Referrals may be for servicing, collection, compromise, suspension, or termination of collection action.
( d ) We may refer delinquent administrative debts to Treasury for offset through the Treasury Offset Program (TOP). Administered by Treasury, TOP's centralized offset process permits Treasury to withhold funds payable by the United States to a person to collect and satisfy delinquent debts the person owes Federal agencies and States.
( e ) We may collect an administrative debt by using Administrative Wage Garnishment.
( f ) We may collect an administrative debt by using Federal Salary Offset.
### §262p–4m. Population, health, and nutrition programs

The Secretary of the Treasury shall instruct the United States Executive Director of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development to urge the bank to support an increase in the amount the bank lends annually to support population, health, and nutrition programs of the borrower countries.

(Pub. L. 95–118, title XVI, §1618, as added Pub. L. 101–513, title V, §562(a)(2), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 2033.)

#### **Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries**

#### Definitions

The definitions in section 262p–5 of this title apply to this section.
QuesTech Inc. and Subsidiaries

       Exhibit (11) - Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share
<TABLE>
                                                                             
                   
                                 Three Months Ended      Nine Months Ended
                                    September 30          September 30    
                                   1997       1996        1997       1996 
   
Primary:
<S>                            <C>        <C>          <C>        <C>
Average Shares Outstanding     1,434,726  1,347,722    1,434,726  1,351,274
Net effect of dilutive stock
  options-based on the
  treasury stock method using
  average market price            83,152     91,329       76,214    132,847
Increase in outstanding
  shares                           4,913     75,702        3,609     32,125
Weighted Average Number of
  Shares                       1,522,791  1,514,753    1,514,549  1,516,246
Net Income                      $119,200   $114,000     $410,900   $392,600
Earnings per share, primary        $0.08      $0.08        $0.27      $0.26

Fully diluted:
Average Shares Outstanding     1,434,726  1,347,722    1,434,726  1,351,274
Net effect of dilutive stock
  options-based on the
  treasury stock method
  using average market price      83,152     94,322       98,026    136,143
Increase in outstanding
  shares                           4,913     75,702        3,609     32,125
Totals                         1,522,791  1,517,746    1,536,361  1,519,542
Net Income                      $119,200   $114,000     $121,600   $392,600
Earnings per share,
  fully diluted                    $0.08      $0.08        $0.27      $0.26
    
</TABLE>