alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Figure 1.6. Two-dimensional model results depicting velocity magnitude and direction in the downstream vicinity of 63rd Street.

94°31'40" 94°31'30" 94°31'20" 94°31'10"

0

0 200 400 600 800 FEET

50 100 150 200 METERS

39°00'50"

39°01'10"

39°01'

Hardesty

Avenue

63rd Street

Base from Jackson County Management Information Systems digital data, 1:833, 2003

Universal Transverse Mercator projection

Zone 15

Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the 

North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83)

EXPLANATION

VELOCITY VECTOR—Indicates direction of flow and

 color represents magnitude, in feet per second

 >, greater than

0 to 2

>2 to 4

>4 to 6

>6 to 8

NOTE: Upstream boundary condition at 63rd Street Bridge: 

 discharge equals 29,970 cubic feet per second

 

 Downstream boundary condition at lower Blue Parkway Bridge:

 stage elevation equals 760 feet
#### Sally Kimmel, Appellant, v. Samuel Kimmel, Respondent.

No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
### §284f. Jurisdiction and venue of actions

For the purpose of any action which may be brought within the United States, its possessions, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, by or against the Association in accordance with the articles, the Association shall be deemed to be an inhabitant of the Federal Judicial district in which its principal office in the United States is located, and any such action at law or in equity to which the Association shall be a party shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States, and the district courts of the United States shall have original jurisdiction of any such action. When the Association is a defendant in any such action, it may, at any time before the trial thereof, remove such action from a State court into the district court of the United States for the proper district by following the procedure for removal of causes otherwise provided by law.

(Pub. L. 86–565, §8, June 30, 1960, 74 Stat. 294.)
### §1457. Rendition of technical and other services to foreign governments; limitations

A Government agency, at the request of the Secretary, may perform such technical or other services as such agency may be competent to render for the government of another country desirous of obtaining such services, upon terms and conditions which are satisfactory to the Secretary and to the head of the Government agency, when it is determined by the Secretary that such services will contribute to the purposes of this chapter. However, nothing in this chapter shall authorize the performance of services relating to the organization, training, operation, development, or combat equipment of the armed forces of a foreign government.

(Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title IV, §402, 62 Stat. 9.)
Editorial Note on Part 416
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

§ 416.1491 Late completion of timely investigation. We may revise a determination or decision after the applicable time period in § 416.1488(a) or § 416.1488(b) expires if we begin an investigation into whether to revise the determination or decision before the applicable time period expires. We may begin the investigation either based on a request by you or by an action on our part. The investigation is a process of gathering facts after a determination or decision has been reopened to determine if a revision of the determination or decision is applicable. ( a ) If we have diligently pursued the investigation to its conclusion, we may revise the determination or decision. The revision may be favorable or unfavorable to you. “Diligently pursued” means that in light of the facts and circumstances of a particular case, the necessary action was undertaken and carried out as promptly as the circumstances permitted. Diligent pursuit will be presumed to have been met if we conclude the investigation and if necessary, revise the determination or decision within 6 months from the date we began the investigation.
( b ) If we have not diligently pursued the investigation to its conclusion, we will revise the determination or decision if a revision is applicable and if it will be favorable to you. We will not revise the determination or decision if it will be unfavorable to you.
[49 FR 46370, Nov. 26, 1984; 49 FR 48036, Dec. 10, 1984]
(No. 6612

#### Maryville Academy, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Department of Children and Family Services, Respondent.

*Opinion filed January 9, 1973.*

M. I. McMahon, Jr., Attorney for Claimant.

William J. Scott, Attorney General; Saul R. Wexler, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.
#### § 654.7 Publication of area classifications.

The Assistant Secretary shall publish annually a list of labor surplus areas together with geographic descriptions thereof. The Assistant Secretary periodically may cause these lists to be published in the Federal Register.

[44 FR 1689, Jan. 5, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 15616, Apr. 12, 1983]
#### § 418.2322 How will a Medicare Part B income-related monthly adjustment amount determination for the effective year affect your Medicare prescription drug coverage?

If we make an income-related monthly adjustment amount determination for you for the effective year under subpart B of this part (Medicare Part B Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount), we will apply that income-related monthly adjustment amount determination under this subpart to determine your Part D income-related monthly adjustment amount for the same effective year. Therefore, if you obtain Medicare prescription drug coverage in the effective year after we make an income-related monthly adjustment amount determination about your Medicare Part B, the income-related monthly adjustment amount determination we made for your Medicare Part B will also apply to your Medicare prescription drug coverage. Any change in your net benefit due will be accompanied by a letter explaining the change in your net benefit and your right to appeal the change.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 214

 221

 228

 228

 243

 238

 238

 238

 237

 237

 238

 243

 243

 244

 244

 244

 243

 245

 248

 248

 249

 249

 250

 252

 252

 251

 247

 246

 244

 243

 239

 154

 157

 157

 152

 158

 186

 174

 180

 180

 187

 182

 176

 176

 166

 170

 176

 177

 180

 182

 188

 172

 174

 185

 200

 184

 170

 161

 169

 175

 162

 168

 199

 204

 209

 213

 221

 228

 225

 228

 227

 227

 227

 231

 225

 227

 227

 226

 229

 230

 233

 233

 235

 232

 234

 241

 238

 225

 215

 216

 220

 219

 222

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

MAY 2007 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: June 5, 2007

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
### §276o. United States Senate-Russia Interparliamentary Group

#### (a) Establishment and meetings

Not to exceed 12 Senators shall be appointed to meet annually with representatives of the Federation Council of Russia for discussion of common problems in the interest of relations between the United States and Russia. The Senators so appointed shall be referred to as the "United States group" of the United States Senate-Russia Interparliamentary Group.

#### (b) Appointment of Members

The majority and minority leaders of the Senate shall appoint the Senators of the United States group. The majority leader of the Senate shall designate 1 Senator as the Chair of the United States group.

#### (c) Funding

There is authorized to be appropriated $100,000 for each fiscal year to assist in meeting the expenses of the United States group for each fiscal year for which an appropriation is made. Appropriations shall be disbursed on vouchers to be approved by the Chair of the United States group.

#### (d) Certification of expenditures

The certificate of the Chair of the United States group shall be final and conclusive upon the accounting officers in the auditing of the accounts of the United States group.

#### (e) Fiscal year 2004 funding

There is authorized within the contingent fund of the Senate under the appropriation account "miscellaneous items" $75,000 for fiscal year 2004 to assist in meeting the official expenses of the United States Senate-Russia Interparliamentary Group including conference room expenses, hospitality expenses, and food and food-related expenses. Expenses shall be paid on vouchers to be approved by the Chair of the United States group. The Secretary of the Senate is authorized to advance such sums as necessary to carry out this subsection.

#### (f) Appropriations

There are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, $100,000 for the United States Senate-Russia Interparliamentary Group.

#### (g) Effective date

#### (1) In general

Subsections (a) though (d) shall apply to fiscal year 2004, and each fiscal year thereafter.

#### (2) Fiscal year 2004

Subsections (e) and (f) shall apply to fiscal year 2004.

(Pub. L. 108–199, div. H, §154, Jan. 23, 2004, 118 Stat. 449.)
EXHIBIT 99.1 - ANNUAL FUNDS APPLICATION STATEMENT




                              [LOGO] JPMORGAN


June 30, 2005

    Hartford Life Global Funding Trusts - Annual Funds Application Statement

I, Albert P. Mari, Jr., being a duly appointed officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. ("Indenture Trustee"), do hereby certify on behalf of the Indenture
Trustee, that, with respect to Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-057:





         1. I have reviewed and examined the application by the Indenture
Trustee, during the fiscal year ending June 15, 2005; of trust money collected
by the Indenture Trustee pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture, pursuant to
which the trust's notes (the "Notes") were issued; and

         2. Based upon my review and examination, to the best of my knowledge,
during such fiscal year, the trust money collected by the Indenture Trustee was
properly applied, pursuant to Section 5.02 of the Indenture.

         Nothing herein shall constitute a representation as to the proper
application by the registered holder of the Notes or the trust of the trust
monies received by it.



JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Indenture Trustee
Worldwide Securities Services
4 New York Plaza, 15th Floor
New York, NY 10004


/s/ Albert P. Mari, Jr.


Name:  Albert P. Mari, Jr.
Title: Vice President


<TABLE>
<S><C>
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK o Institutional Trust Services o 4 New York Plaza, Floor 15, New York, NY 10004
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TOSECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PACCAR Financial Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael A. Tembreull, Vice Chairman of the Company, certify,  pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 
| /s/ Michael A. Tembreull  |
|---------------------------|
| Michael A. Tembreull      |
| Vice Chairman             |
| PACCAR Financial Corp.    |
| (chief financial officer) |

 

 

November 8, 2002

 

 

----
- USGS Home
- Contact						   USGS
- Search 
USGS

- mobile menu barsUSGS Publications Warehouse
    Contact
    Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
    FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- USGS Publications Warehouse
- Contact
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series

- USGS Publications 
  Warehouse
- Explore					    
  Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
    Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Explore recent 
    publications by USGS Authors
- Browse all of Pubs 
    Warehouse by Publication type and year
- Documentation					    
  FAQS
    Web 
    Service Documentation
    Other 
    Resources
    Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- FAQS
- Web 
    Service Documentation
- Other 
    Resources
- Descriptions of US Geological Survey Report Series
- Contact

### Hydrology and geochemistry of Abert, Summer, and Goose 
lakes, and other closed basin lakes in south-central Oregon

#### Professional Paper 502-B

Tweet


#### Links

- More information: **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**     
                             (html)
- Document: **Document**                                
  (pdf)
- Plates:
- **Plate 1**                                
    (pdf)
- **Plate 2**                                
    (pdf)
- Paper 
  version: **USGS Store**
- Download citation as:  RIS

#### Abstract

#### Additional publication details

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable 
Document Format (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it 
is recommended that you download the documents to your computer and open them 
with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your browser may not display or 
print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe 
Reader, free of charge. More information about viewing, downloading, and 
printing report files can be found here.

Accessibility
				    FOIA				    Privacy				    Policies and 
Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior				    | 				    
U.S. Geological 
Survey				    				   URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/pp502B 
                   				    				   Page Contact Information: Pubs 
Warehouse Contact Page				    				   Page Last Modified: February 03, 
2017 13:21:23
### §3931. Board of Examiners

#### (a) Establishment; membership; chairman

The President shall establish a Board of Examiners for the Foreign Service to develop, and supervise the administration of, examinations prescribed under section 3941(b) of this title to be given to candidates for appointment in the Service. The Board shall consist of 15 members appointed by the President (no fewer than 5 of whom shall be appointed from among individuals who are not Government employees and who shall be qualified for service on the Board by virtue of their knowledge, experience, or training in the fields of testing or equal employment opportunity). The Board shall include representatives of agencies utilizing the Foreign Service personnel system and representatives of other agencies which have responsibility for employment testing. The Board shall be chaired by a member of the Board, designated by the President, who is a member of the Service.

#### (b) Review of examinations; report to Secretary of State

The Board of Examiners shall periodically review the examinations prescribed under section 3941(b) of this title in order to determine—

(1) whether any such examination has an adverse impact on the hiring, promotion, or other employment opportunity of members of any race, sex, or ethnic group;

(2) methods of minimizing any such adverse impact;

(3) alternatives to any examinations which have such an adverse impact; and

(4) whether such examinations are valid in relation to job performance.

The Board of Examiners shall annually report its findings under this subsection to the Secretary of State and shall furnish to the Secretary of State its recommendations for improvements in the development, use, and administration of the examinations prescribed under section 3941(b) of this title.

#### (c) Vacancies

Any vacancy or vacancies on the Board shall not impair the right of the remaining members to exercise the full powers of the Board.

(Pub. L. 96–465, title I, §211, Oct. 17, 1980, 94 Stat. 2083.)

#### **Executive Documents**

#### Establishment of Board of Examiners

For establishment of the Board of Examiners for the Foreign Service and appointment of its members, see section 6 of Ex. Ord. No. 12293, Feb. 23, 1981, 46 F.R. 13970, set out as note under section 3901 of this title.
#### § 219.62 When evidence of “good cause” is required.

The principle of “good cause”, as defined in part 217 of this chapter, is applied by the Board in determining whether to allow an application which is submitted more than two years after the employee's death as acceptable for the lump-sum death payment or for an annuity unpaid at death, or to accept the proof of support required for entitlement to a parent's annuity if such proof is filed more than two years after the employee's death.
§ 667.170 What responsibility review does the Department conduct for awards made under WIA title I, subtitle D? ( a ) Before final selection as a potential grantee, we conduct a review of the available records to assess the organization's overall responsibility to administer Federal funds. As part of this review, we may consider any information that has come to our attention and will consider the organization's history with regard to the management of other grants, including DOL grants. The failure to meet any one responsibility test, except for those listed in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, does not establish that the organization is not responsible unless the failure is substantial or persistent (for two or more consecutive years). The responsibility tests include: ( 1 ) The organization's efforts to recover debts (for which three demand letters have been sent) established by final agency action have been unsuccessful, or that there has been failure to comply with an approved repayment plan;
( 2 ) Established fraud or criminal activity of a significant nature within the organization.
( 3 ) Serious administrative deficiencies that we identify, such as failure to maintain a financial management system as required by Federal regulations;
( 4 ) Willful obstruction of the audit process;
( 5 ) Failure to provide services to applicants as agreed to in a current or recent grant or to meet applicable performance standards;
( 6 ) Failure to correct deficiencies brought to the grantee's attention in writing as a result of monitoring activities, reviews, assessments, or other activities;
( 7 ) Failure to return a grant closeout package or outstanding advances within 90 days of the grant expiration date or receipt of closeout package, whichever is later, unless an extension has been requested and granted; final billings reflecting serious cost category or total budget cost overrun;
( 8 ) Failure to submit required reports;
( 9 ) Failure to properly report and dispose of government property as instructed by DOL;
( 10 ) Failure to have maintained effective cash management or cost controls resulting in excess cash on hand;
( 11 ) Failure to ensure that a subrecipient complies with its OMB Circular A-133 audit requirements specified at § 667.200(b);
( 12 ) Failure to audit a subrecipient within the required period;
( 13 ) Final disallowed costs in excess of five percent of the grant or contract award if, in the judgement of the grant officer, the disallowances are egregious findings and;
( 14 ) Failure to establish a mechanism to resolve a subrecipient's audit in a timely fashion.
( b ) This responsibility review is independent of the competitive process. Applicants which are determined to be not responsible will not be selected as potential grantees irrespective of their standing in the competition.
#### The People of the State of New York v. Max Mahlsak.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.
(No. 4296

#### Quentin George Daiber, Claimant, *vs.*State of Illinois, Respondent.

*Opinion filed October 13, 1950.*

Eldon M. Durr, Attorney for Claimant.

Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General; C. Arthur Nebel, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Delaney, J.

On June 13, 1949, the claimant, Quentin George Daiber, was an employee of the respondent in the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways. While cleaning the sickle of a power mower, his hand slipped causing the left ring finger to be caught in the sickle, and the major portion of the distal phalanx was cut off. His foreman, Joseph E. Britt of Alhambra, was notified at. once of the accident, and took Mr. Daiber. to St. Joseph’s Hospital, Highland, where Dr. Ewald Hermann rendered first attention and amputated the finger at the distal joint.

Claimant was first employed by the Division on March 1, 1949, as a highway section man’s helper at a salary of $180.00. a month. Division employees in this classification ordinarily work continuously throughout the year. Claimant was 28 years of age, married,. and had three children under 16 years of age dependent upon him for support. His compensation rate, therefore, would be $18.00 per week. However, as the injury was incurred *144after July 1, 1947, this must be increased 30 per cent, making his compensation rate $23.40 per week.

At the time of the accident, the employer and employee were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State, and notice of the accident, and claim for compensation were made within the time provided by the Act. All medical services were paid by the respondent.

Claimant is entitled to an award for one-half the loss of his left ring finger. Under Section 8, Paragraphs (e), (4^, and (j) as increased by Paragraph (m), this would be 12% weeks at $23.40 per week, or $292.50. The claimant was temporarily totally disabled from June 14, 1949 to June 20, 1949. Respondent paid him full salary for a period amounting to $42.00. The sum of $18.60 must be deducted from the award for nonproductive time.

An award is, therefore, made in favor of the claimant, Quentin George Daiber, in the sum of $292.50, less the sum of $18.60 paid for non-productive time, or the sum of $273.90, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith.

Henry P. Keefe, Court Reporter, was employed to take and transcribe the testimony, for which he made a charge of $11.60. We find that this charge is fair, reasonable and customary.

An award is, therefore, entered in favor of Henry P. Keefe in the sum of $11.60.

This award is subject to the approval of the Governor as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees.”