alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         770,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    21,600
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,538,200
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,344,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,378,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,012,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,378,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,700,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,999,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (19,100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               133,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                645,800
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            645,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   645,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    21.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT OCTOBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                         349,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    212,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               939,000
<PP&E>                                       6,484,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,342,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,653,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,584,000
<BONDS>                                      2,697,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (206,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,653,000
<SALES>                                      6,663,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,663,000
<CGS>                                        5,837,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,987,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               782,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             170,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (276,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (276,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)


</TABLE>
<page> 		 		  EXHIBIT 31.01


CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:


1.		I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the
registrant;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of Demeter's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.






Date:  May 17, 2004        /s/	 Jeffrey A. Rothman
                       	 Jeffrey A. Rothman
                            	 President,
                             	 Demeter Management Corporation,
                             	 general partner of the registrant
#### § 429.211 Are there any penalties for filing false claims?

A person who files a false claim or makes a false or fraudulent statement in a claim against the United States may be imprisoned for not more than 5 years (18 U.S.C. 287, 1001). In addition, that person may be liable for a civil penalty of not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000 and damages of triple the loss or damage sustained by the United States, as well as the costs of a civil action brought to recover any penalty or damages (31 U.S.C. 3729).
### §283z. Proposal of light-capital or intermediate technologies as part of Bank's development strategy

#### (a) Contents of proposed resolution

The United States Executive Director of the Bank shall propose to the Board of Executive Directors of the Bank the adoption of a resolution providing (1) that the development and utilization of light-capital or intermediate technologies should be accepted as major facets of the Bank's development strategy, and (2) that such light-capital or intermediate technologies should be developed and utilized as soon as possible in all Bank activities. Such resolution shall further provide that, by the close of the calendar year 1977, some projects that employ primarily such light-capital or intermediate technologies shall be designed and approved.

#### (b) Progress report to Congress

The United States Governor of the Bank shall report to the Congress no later than six months after May 31, 1976, on the proposal made under subsection (a), and no later than twelve months after such date on the progress that has been made with respect to such proposal.

(Pub. L. 86–147, §28, formerly §29, as added Pub. L. 94–302, title I, §104, May 31, 1976, 90 Stat. 593; renumbered §28, Pub. L. 96–259, title I, §101(1), June 3, 1980, 94 Stat. 429.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Prior Provisions

A prior section 28 of Pub. L. 86–147, as added by section 103(a)(1) of Pub. L. 94–302, was classified to section 283y of this title prior to repeal by Pub. L. 95–118, title VII, §702, Oct. 3, 1977, 91 Stat. 1070.
§ 603.7 What requirements apply to subpoenas, other compulsory processes, and disclosure to officials with subpoena authority? ( a ) *In general.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, when a subpoena or other compulsory process is served upon a State UC agency or the State, any official or employee thereof, or any recipient of confidential UC information, which requires the production of confidential UC information or appearance for testimony upon any matter concerning such information, the State or State UC agency or recipient must file and diligently pursue a motion to quash the subpoena or other compulsory process if other means of avoiding the disclosure of confidential UC information are not successful or if the court has not already ruled on the disclosure. Only if such motion is denied by the court or other forum may the requested confidential UC information be disclosed, and only upon such terms as the court or forum may order, such as that the recipient protect the disclosed information and pay the State's or State UC agency's costs of disclosure.
( b ) *Exceptions.* The requirement of paragraph (a) of this section to move to quash subpoenas shall not be applicable, so that disclosure is permissible, where— ( 1 ) *Court Decision* —a subpoena or other compulsory legal process has been served and a court has previously issued a binding precedential decision that requires disclosures of this type, or a well-established pattern of prior court decisions have required disclosures of this type, or
( 2 ) *Official with subpoena authority* —Confidential UC information has been subpoenaed, by a local, State or Federal governmental official, other than a clerk of court on behalf of a litigant, with authority to obtain such information by subpoena under State or Federal law. The State or State UC agency may choose to disclose such confidential UC information to these officials without the actual issuance of a subpoena.
#### § 418.1325 When may you request a reconsideration?

If you are dissatisfied with our initial determination about your income-related monthly adjustment amount, you may request that we reconsider it. In addition, a person who shows that his or her rights may be adversely affected by the initial determination may request a reconsideration. We may accept requests for reconsideration that are filed by electronic or other means that we determine to be appropriate. Subject to the provisions of this section and § 418.1330, when you request a reconsideration, we will use the rules in §§ 404.907 through 404.922 of this chapter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 77

 86

 75

 73

 77

 52

 43

 36

 33

 32

 33

 31

 28

 27

 26

 23

 23

 25

 25

 25

 27

 24

 25

 25

 24

 24

 23

 25

 24

 25

 72

 74

 73

 72

 22

 42

 36

 33

 31

 31

 30

 29

 27

 25

 24

 21

 21

 22

 24

 23

 24

 22

 22

 24

 24

 23

 23

 22

 22

 22

 75

 78

 74

 73

 61

 48

 40

 35

 32

 31

 32

 30

 28

 27

 25

 22

 22

 23

 24

 24

 25

 23

 23

 25

 24

 24

 23

 24

 23

 23

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

JUNE 2021 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: January 27, 2022

HIGH LOW MEAN

 71.6

 71.6

 70.4

 69.6

 77.0

 68.4

 67.1

 64.9

 62.2

 61.8

 62.3

 63.4

 64.5

 64.6

 63.6

 62.9

 63.3

 64.4

 64.8

 64.8

 64.5

 64.2

 64.3

 64.1

 64.4

 64.6

 65.0

 65.1

 65.2

 64.9

 67.3

 67.7

 67.1

 65.5

 65.4

 64.5

 63.7

 60.8

 59.4

 58.9

 59.2

 60.0

 61.6

 61.7

 61.3

 60.6

 60.1

 60.9

 61.7

 61.9

 61.9

 61.4

 61.5

 61.4

 61.4

 61.7

 62.0

 62.0

 62.1

 62.0

 69.5

 69.9

 68.9

 67.7

 67.7

 66.6

 65.6

 62.7

 60.7

 60.4

 60.7

 61.8

 62.9

 63.1

 62.4

 61.7

 61.7

 62.6

 63.3

 63.3

 63.2

 62.8

 62.8

 62.8

 63.0

 63.2

 63.5

 63.5

 63.7

 63.4

HIGH LOW MEAN

 9.1

 9.1

 9.1

 9.2

 9.5

 9.8

 9.9

 10.4

 10.6

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.6

 10.6

 10.7

 10.8

 10.9

 10.8

 10.7

 10.7

 10.7

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.9

 10.9

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 10.8

 8.4

 8.4

 8.4

 8.7

 8.2

 9.2

 9.3

 9.6

 10.4

 10.5

 10.4

 10.3

 10.2

 10.3

 10.5

 10.6

 10.5

 10.4

 10.3

 10.3

 10.4

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 10.4

 8.8

 8.7

 8.8

 9.0

 9.1

 9.5

 9.7

 10.1

 10.5

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.4

 10.4

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.6

 10.5

 10.5

 10.5

 10.6

 10.6

 10.7

 10.7

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

 10.6

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIPON ON THE STANISLAUS RIVER

 ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS WATER TEMPERATURE, DEG DISSOLVED OXYZEN, PPM
### §3001. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe; establishment

There is established the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe (hereafter in this chapter referred to as the "Commission").

(Pub. L. 94–304, §1, June 3, 1976, 90 Stat. 661.)
#### THOMAS, Respondent, vs. CITY OF FORT PIERRE, Appellant.

(241 N. W. 327.)

(File No. 7077.

Opinion filed March 7, 1932.)

*Martens &*Goldsmith, of Pierre, for Appellant.

*O’Keeffe & Stephens,*of Pierre, and *F. W. Lambert,*of Ft. Pierre, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The city of Ft. Pierre maintains a municipal system for the sale and distribution of natural gas to its inhabitants. A building in said city belonging to the Thomas Estate served by municipal gas was damaged by explosion of gas, and *520plaintiff instituted this action against the city to recover the amount of such damage. Plaintiff prevailed below, was awarded a verdict of approximately $800, and, from judgment entered! thereon and denial of its motion for new trial, defendant city appealed.

 The facts, though somewhat lengthy and complicated', are. not seriously in dispute, and the ultimate question in the case is whether or not actionable wrong or negligence, properly chargeable to the city, is established. Two of the judges of this court believe the facts insufficient to make out liability, and therefore think the judgment and order appealed from ought to be reversed. A majority of the judges, however, believe the liability of the municipality sufficiently appears, and that the judgment ought to be affirmed, but they are not able to come to agreement as to what specific acts or omissions shown by the record constitute, as a matter of law, the particular actionable wrong or negligence whence the liability of the city arises. Under these circumstances, a majority failing to find prejudicial error,.and believing the result arrived at correct, it is apparent that the judgment must be affirmed. It is equally apparent that it is impossible for any of the judges to write an opinion setting forth in detail his views of the law, and secure the concurrence of a majority therein save only as to the pronouncement of the affirmance.

Inasmuch as only such views as are shared by a majority of the judges can constitute the views of this court as a court, such opinion, if written, would establish no law, and would constitute no precedent beyond the mere result arrived at.

All the judges deem it proper, therefore, to hand down this opinion, announcing as the decision of the court that the judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

CAMPBELL, P. J„ and ROBERTS, J, dissenting.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPreconditioning the Helmholtz Equation for Rigid DuctsAn innovative hyperbolic preconditioning technique is developed for the numerical solution of the Helmholtz equation which governs acoustic propagation in ducts. Two pseudo-time parameters are used to produce an explicit iterative finite difference scheme. This scheme eliminates the large matrix storage requirements normally associated with numerical solutions to the Helmholtz equation. The solution procedure is very fast when compared to other transient and steady methods. Optimization and an error analysis of the preconditioning factors are present. For validation, the method is applied to sound propagation in a 2D semi-infinite hard wall duct.Document ID19980041420Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBaumeister, Kenneth J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Kreider, Kevin L.*(Akron Univ. Akron, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1998Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberE-10501NASA/TM-107349NAS 1.15:107349Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52-00Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980041420.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### §§2441 to 2443. Repealed. Pub. L. 95–384, §12(c)(4), Sept. 26, 1978, 92 Stat. 737

Section 2441, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. VI, §901, as added Pub. L. 93–559, §42, Dec. 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 1812; amended Pub. L. 94–329, title IV, §401, June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 756, related to Congressional statement of policy with regard to Middle East assistance.

Section 2442, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. VI, §902, as added Pub. L. 93–559, §42, Dec. 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 1812, related to allocations of funds with regard to Middle East assistance.

Section 2443, Pub. L. 87–195, pt. VI, §903, as added Pub. L. 93–559, §42, Dec. 30, 1974, 88 Stat. 1812; amended Pub. L. 94–329, title V, §502, June 30, 1976, 90 Stat. 763; Pub. L. 95–92, §13, Aug. 4, 1977, 91 Stat. 621, related to a special requirements fund with regard to Middle East assistance.
§ 609.16 Administration in absence of an Agreement. ( a ) *Administering Program.* The Department shall administer the UCFE Program through personnel of the Department or through other arrangements under procedures prescribed by the Department, in the case of any State which does not have an Agreement with the Secretary as provided for in 5 U.S.C. 8502. The procedures prescribed by the Department under this section shall be consistent with the Act and this part.
( b ) *Applicable State law.* On the filing by an individual of a claim for UCFE in accordance with arrangements under this section, UCFE shall be paid to the individual, if eligible, in the same amount, on the same terms, and subject to the same conditions as would be paid to the individual under the applicable State law if the individual's Federal civilian service and Federal wages had been included as employment and wages under the State law. Any such claim shall include the individual's Federal civilian service and Federal wages, combined with any service and wages covered by State law. However, if the individual, without regard to his or her Federal civilian service and Federal wages, has employment or wages sufficient to qualify for compensation during the benefit year under that State law, then payments of UCFE under this section may be made only on the basis of the individual's Federal civilian service and Federal wages.
( c ) *Fair hearing.* An individual whose claim for UCFE is denied under this section is entitled to a fair hearing under rules of procedure prescribed by the Department. A final determination by the Department with respect to entitlement to UCFE under this section is subject to review by the courts in the same manner and to the same extent as is provided by section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
###### Editorial Note on Part 416

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 416 appear at 68 FR 53509, Sept. 11, 2003.

#### § 416.412 Amount of benefits; eligible couple.

The benefit under this part for an eligible couple (including couples where one or both members of the couple are receiving benefits payable under the § 416.212 provisions), neither of whom is subject to suspension of benefits based on § 416.1325 or reduction of benefits based on § 416.414 nor is a qualified individual (as defined in § 416.221) shall be payable at the rate of $8,460 per year ($705 per month), effective for the period beginning January 1, 1996. This rate is the result of a 2.6 percent cost-of-living adjustment (see § 416.405) to the December 1995 rate. For the period January 1, through December 31, 1995, the rate payable, as increased by the 2.8 percent cost-of-living adjustment, was $8,224 per year ($687 per month). For the period January 1, through December 31, 1994, the rate payable, as increased by the 2.6 percent cost-of-living adjustment, was $8,028 per year ($669 per month). The monthly rate is reduced by the amount of the couple's income which is not excluded pursuant to subpart K of this part.

[61 FR 10278, Mar. 13, 1996]