alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### §1435. Delegation of authority by Secretary

The Secretary may delegate, to such officers of the Government as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, any of the powers conferred upon him by this chapter to the extent that he finds such delegation to be in the interest of the purposes expressed in this chapter and the efficient administration of the programs undertaken pursuant to this chapter.

(Jan. 27, 1948, ch. 36, title X, §1002, 62 Stat. 13.)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jorge MARTINEZ-ALVARADO, a.k.a. Saul Sandoval Lopez, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-50886.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 17, 2006.*

Decided July 21, 2006.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Mark Childs, AUSA, USLA-Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Gail Ivens, Esq., FPDCA-Federal Public Defender’s Office (Los Angeles), Glendale, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before: B. FLETCHER, HAWKINS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and the opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. *See United States v. Hooton,*693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th *568Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Supreme Court’s decision in *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding on this court until the Supreme Court overrules it. *See United States v. Weiland,*420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that this court remains bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in *Almendarez-Torres*that a district court judge may enhance a sentence on the basis of prior convictions, even if the fact of those convictions was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt). Further, we upheld the identical condition of supervised release challenged here in *United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez,*441 F.3d 767 (9th Cir.2006).

Accordingly, we grant the government’s motion for summary affirmance of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1997, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         903,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  233,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    47,700
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      13,372,400
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,220,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,517,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,871,200
<BONDS>                                        542,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,517,900
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,368,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  967,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (11,600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                41,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                384,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            384,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   384,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### §3357b. Establishment of training, advising, and institutional capacity-building program for military forces of Taiwan

Consistent with the Taiwan Relations Act (22 U.S.C. 3301 et seq.) and pursuant to section 3353 of this title, the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with appropriate officials of Taiwan, shall establish a comprehensive training, advising, and institutional capacity-building program for the military forces of Taiwan using the authorities provided in chapter 16 of title 10 and other applicable statutory authorities available to the Secretary of Defense.

(Pub. L. 118–31, div. A, title XIII, §1309(a), Dec. 22, 2023, 137 Stat. 494.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### References in Text

The Taiwan Relations Act, referred to in text, is Pub. L. 96–8, Apr. 10, 1979, 93 Stat. 14, which is classified generally to chapter 48 (§3301 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3301 of this title and Tables.

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, and not as part of the Taiwan Enhanced Resilience Act which comprises this chapter.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Generic environmental impactstatement for continued storage of spent nuclear fuel: final report.**
 
Volumes:One | Two
Appendices:A: Part 1 | A: Part 2 andB-F
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:10/2157
Item Number:1051-H-48 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000938068
 
April 19, 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 119

 118

 116

 109

 108

 106

 105

 102

 100

 100

 98

 102

 103

 103

 105

 107

 106

 105

 105

 108

 110

 110

 107

 106

 103

 105

 107

 107

 106

 108

 108

 109

 107

 104

 99

 98

 98

 97

 96

 94

 92

 92

 92

 93

 96

 100

 102

 103

 100

 98

 98

 102

 105

 104

 101

 100

 99

 100

 101

 103

 104

 102

 112

 111

 108

 103

 101

 101

 100

 98

 97

 95

 94

 95

 97

 100

 103

 104

 104

 102

 100

 102

 106

 107

 105

 103

 101

 102

 103

 103

 104

 105

 105

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

OCTOBER 2019 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 13, 2019

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

RIO VISTA ON THE SACRAMENTO RIVER
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

DAY HIGH

 534

 475

 593

 608

 716

 817

 820

 928

 981

 993

 981

 983

 911

 898

 837

 683

 717

 599

 648

 665

 634

 600

 649

 647

 552

 573

 537

 508

 456

 424

 177

 178

 173

 183

 197

 187

 194

 184

 198

 185

 200

 223

 217

 207

 202

 196

 191

 183

 184

 180

 180

 180

 193

 203

 199

 176

 180

 219

 195

 172

 326

 311

 327

 349

 374

 390

 408

 417

 432

 442

 488

 481

 455

 450

 438

 398

 391

 365

 342

 331

 329

 314

 320

 341

 330

 335

 329

 339

 313

 277

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

SEPTEMBER 2012 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: November 15, 2012

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

SAN ANDREAS ON THE SAN JOAQUIN RIVER
##### 



Exhibit 14.1
 SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES (WWH), INC.
 Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
  1. Introduction
 Code
   2. Compliance with Laws, Rules and Regulations
   3. Trading on Inside Information




---



##### 



4. Protection of Confidential Proprietary Information
     5. Conflicts of Interest
    
    
    Working, in any capacity, for a competitor, customer or supplier while employed by
the Company.
 2




---



##### 




    
    Accepting gifts of more than modest value or receiving personal discounts or other
benefits as a result of your position in the Company from a competitor, customer or
supplier.
    
    Competing with the Company for the purchase or sale of property, services or other
interests.
    
    Having an interest in a transaction involving the Company, a customer or supplier
(other than as an employee, officer or director of the Company and not including
routine investments in publicly traded companies).
    
    Receiving a loan or guarantee of an obligation as a result of your position with
the Company.
    
    Directing business to a supplier owned or managed by, or which employs, a relative
or friend.
   6. Protection and Proper Use of Company Assets
   7. Corporate Opportunities
  3




---



##### 



8. Fair Dealing
    FCPA
 9. Quality of Public Disclosures
  10. Compliance with This Code and Reporting of Any Illegal or Unethical Behavior
   4




---



##### 



11. Waivers and Amendments
  12. Equal Opportunity, Non-Discrimination and Fair Employment
  5




---



##### 



13. Compliance with Antitrust Laws
  14. Political Contributions and Activities
  15. Environment, Health and Safety
  6
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
“Form 10-K”) for the year ended December 31, 2014 of NanoVibronix, Inc. (the “Company”).  I,
William Stern, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |        |                                                      
|-------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2015 | By:    | /s/ William Stern                                    
|                     | Name:  | William Stern                                        
|                     | Title: | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



The foregoing certification is being furnished
as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly,
is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00306-CR

Luann Meyer Penny, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 44,271, HONORABLE J. ALLAN GARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

In the above cause, appellant’s brief was first due on July 25, 2016. Appellant’s

counsel has now filed her fourth and “final” motion for extension of time to file appellant’s

brief, seeking an extension until November 23, 2016, for a total extension of 120 days. We grant

the motion and ORDER counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than the following Monday,

November 28, 2016. No further extensions will be granted. If counsel fails to file a brief by the

deadline, a hearing before the district court will be ordered.1

It is ordered on November 3, 2016.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Do Not Publish

 See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2477

TRUITT A. SEGERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-94-657-6)

Submitted: October 3, 1995 Decided: March 21, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Truitt A. Segers, Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his action for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Segers v. United States Dep't of Veterans Affairs, No. CA-94-657-6

(M.D.N.C. July 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.1






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







The Board of Directors


Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp.:





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-148645), of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp. of  our report dated April 15, 2011, relating to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.







By:
/s/ Rothstein Kass & Company, P.C.Rothstein Kass & Company, P.C.Roseland, New JerseyApril 15, 2011
### §287b–1. Additional report on other United States contributions to the United Nations

#### (a) In general

Not later than 90 days after December 16, 2016, and annually thereafter, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall submit to Congress a report on all assessed and voluntary contributions with a value greater than $100,000, including in-kind, of the United States Government to the United Nations and its affiliated agencies and related bodies during the previous fiscal year.

#### (b) Content

The report required under subsection (a) shall include the following elements:

(1) The total amount of all assessed and voluntary contributions, including in-kind, of the United States Government to the United Nations and its affiliated agencies and related bodies during the previous fiscal year.

(2) The approximate percentage of United States Government contributions to each United Nations affiliated agency or body in such fiscal year when compared with all contributions to each such agency or body from any source in such fiscal year.

(3) For each such United States Government contribution—

(A) the amount of each such contribution;

(B) a description of each such contribution (including whether assessed or voluntary);

(C) the department or agency of the United States Government responsible for each such contribution;

(D) the purpose of each such contribution; and

(E) the United Nations or its affiliated agency or related body receiving the contribution.

#### (c) Scope of initial report

The first report required under subsection (a) shall include the information required under this section for the previous 3 fiscal years.

#### (d) Public availability of information

Not later than 14 days after submitting a report required under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall post a public version of such report on a text-based, searchable, and publicly available Internet Web site.

(Pub. L. 114–323, title III, §312, Dec. 16, 2016, 130 Stat. 1925.)

#### **Editorial Notes**

#### Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Department of State Authorities Act, Fiscal Year 2017, and not as part of act Dec. 20, 1945, ch. 583, 59 Stat. 619, known as the United Nations Participation Act of 1945, which comprises this subchapter.
## **EXHIBIT 32.2**

## ** **

## **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

## ** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/Aof 155 East Tropicana, LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, and 155 EastTropicana Finance Corp., a Nevada corporation (collectively, the “Company”),for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Neil G.Kiefer, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Neil G. Kiefer                     |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Neil G. Kiefer,                        |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| April 23, 2008                    |   |

 

The foregoing certifications are being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and are not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the quarter  ended June 30, 1998 for May Limited  Partnership  1983-2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000735552
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1983-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         186
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  193
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               379
<PP&E>                                         16,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,216
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          16
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   832
<SALES>                                        418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               423
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                268
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            268
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  13.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  13.45
        


</TABLE>
April 15 , 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JOHN M. PERONE , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 00969

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

___________ _____________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decisi on certified below for observance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

DAY HIGH

 0

 23,629

 22,937

 23,822

 22,737

 22,221

 20,678

 22,132

 22,585

 25,028

 25,032

 24,622

 25,542

 25,685

 24,300

 23,229

 24,403

 21,977

 19,767

 19,585

 19,722

 20,410

 20,476

 22,016

 23,115

 25,678

 26,206

 25,513

 25,605

 24,543

 24,853

 0

 14,075

 13,855

 12,970

 13,425

 13,536

 12,325

 13,052

 13,239

 14,927

 14,922

 14,108

 14,296

 13,266

 12,269

 12,544

 12,401

 12,171

 9,469

 10,688

 10,307

 10,624

 11,180

 12,215

 14,894

 15,005

 15,217

 15,219

 13,874

 14,041

 13,906

 0

 19,757

 19,387

 19,369

 19,302

 18,997

 17,510

 17,953

 18,070

 19,330

 19,558

 19,243

 19,900

 19,774

 19,021

 18,400

 19,483

 18,005

 15,434

 15,559

 15,555

 15,896

 15,397

 16,343

 18,832

 20,641

 20,846

 21,232

 20,815

 19,980

 20,108

LOW MEAN

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION-CENTRAL VALLEY PROJECT-CALIFORNIA

DECEMBER 2020 WATER QUALITY REPORT RUN DATE: February 2, 2021

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY, UMHOS 

Comments:

0 reading indicates that the station was out of service.

PORT CHICAGO TOP IN SUISUN BAY